Commitments and Contingencies

Loan commitments are made to accommodate the financial needs of the Bank’s customers. The Bank offers commercial, mortgage, and consumer credit products to its customers in the normal course of business, which are detailed in Note 5. These products represent a diversified credit portfolio and are generally issued to borrowers within the Bank’s locations in Southeastern Pennsylvania. The ability of the customers to repay their credit is, to some extent, dependent upon the economy in the Bank’s market areas. Collateral is obtained based on management’s credit assessment of the customer.

Standby letters of credit commit the Bank to make payments on behalf of customers when certain specified future events occur. They are primarily issued to support commercial paper, medium and long-term notes and debentures, including industrial revenue obligations. The approximate term is usually one year but some can be up to five years. Historically, substantially all standby letters of credit expire unfunded. If funded, the majority of the letters of credit carry current market interest rates if converted to loans. Because letters of credit are generally un-assignable by either the Bank or the borrower, they only have value to the Bank and the borrower. The carrying amount is recorded as unamortized deferred fees and the exposure is considered in the reserve for credit risk. At December 31, 2014, the maximum potential amount of future payments under letters of credit is $46.9 million. The current carrying amount of the contingent obligation is $441 thousand. This arrangement has credit risk essentially the same as that involved in extending loans to customers and is subject to the Bank’s normal credit policies. Collateral is obtained based on management’s credit assessment of the customer.

The Bank maintains a reserve in other liabilities for estimated losses associated with sold mortgages that may be repurchased. At December 31, 2014, the reserve for sold mortgages was $264 thousand.

The Corporation entered into risk participation agreements (RPAs) as a guarantor to other financial institutions, in order to mitigate those institutions’ credit risk associated with interest rate swaps with third parties. The RPA stipulates that, in the event of default by the third party on the interest rate swap, the Corporation will reimburse a portion of the loss borne by the financial institution. The third parties usually have other borrowing relationships with the Corporation. The Corporation monitors overall borrower collateral and performance, and at the end of December 31, 2014, believes sufficient collateral is available to cover potential swap losses. The Corporation pledges cash or securities to cover a portion of the negative fair value of the RPAs, as measured by the participant financial institution. The terms of the RPAs, which correspond to the terms of the underlying swaps, range from 10 to 13 years. At December 31, 2014, the notional amount of the RPAs was $19.4 million, with a negative fair value of $1.2 million, of which $370 thousand was pledged to the participant financial institutions as collateral. The maximum potential future payment guaranteed by the Corporation cannot be readily estimated, but is dependent upon the fair value of the interest rate swaps at the time of default. If an event of default on all contracts had occurred at December 31, 2014, the Corporation would have been required to make payments of approximately $1.2 million. The RPA requires the Corporation to reimburse the institution in proportion to the pro rata share of the third party transactions, in the event the third party fails to make a payment to the institution. In exchange, the Corporation receives an agreed-upon fee from the institution for taking this risk. The fee is paid upfront to the Corporation and the Corporation recognizes the fee over the term of the loan(s). The fair value of the guarantee was $74 thousand at December 31, 2014.

Based on consultation with the Corporation’s legal counsel, management is not aware of any litigation that would be probable of occurring or probable of having a material adverse effect on the Corporation’s consolidated balance sheet or statement of income. There are no proceedings pending other than the ordinary routine litigation incident to the business of the Corporation. In addition, there are no material proceedings pending or known to be threatened or contemplated against the Corporation or the Bank by government authorities.

The following schedule summarizes the Corporation’s off-balance sheet financial instruments at December 31, 2014:



(Dollars in thousands)	Contract/Notional Amount
Financial instruments representing credit risk:
Commitments to extend credit	$	538,488
Performance letters of credit	19,240
Financial standby letters of credit	27,526
Other letters of credit	101

At December 31, 2014, the Corporation and its subsidiaries were obligated under non-cancelable leases for various premises and equipment. Portions of certain properties are subleased. A summary of the future minimum rental commitments under non-cancelable operating leases with original or remaining terms greater than one year is as follows:



(Dollars in thousands)
Year	Amount
2015	$	2,297
2016	2,269
2017	2,080
2018	2,096
2019	1,705
Thereafter	23,092
Total	$	33,539

The following table summarizes rental expense charged to operations for the periods indicated:



	For the Years Ended December 31,
(Dollars in thousands)	2014			2013			2012
Rental expense	$	2,732		$	2,304		$	2,250
Sublease rental income	(238		)	(278		)	(396		)
Net rental expense	$	2,494		$	2,026		$	1,854

Minimum future rental income receivable under subleases from non-cancelable operating leases was $183 thousand at December 31, 2014.