XML 36 R23.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.8.0.1
Significant Accounting Policies (Policies)
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2017
Accounting Policies [Abstract]  
Basis of Presentation and Use of Estimates

Basis of Presentation and Use of Estimates. The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of hopTo Inc. and its subsidiaries (collectively, “we”, “us”, “our”, or “Company”); significant intercompany accounts and transactions are eliminated upon consolidation. The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”) requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. These estimates include: the amount of stock-based compensation expense; the allowance for doubtful accounts; the estimated lives of property of equipment, valuation and amortization of intangible assets (including capitalized software); depreciation of long-lived assets; valuation of warrants; post-employment benefits; and accruals for liabilities and taxes. While the Company believes that such estimates are fair, actual results could differ materially from those estimates.

Property and Equipment

Property and Equipment. Property and equipment are stated at cost. Depreciation is calculated using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the respective assets, between three and seven years. Amortization of leasehold improvements is calculated using the straight-line method over the lesser of the lease term or useful lives of the respective assets, between three and seven years.

Shipping and Handling

Shipping and Handling. Shipping and handling costs are included in cost of revenue for all periods presented.

Software Development Costs

Software Development Costs. Under the criteria set forth in Financial Accounting Standards Board’s (FASB) Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 985-20, “Costs of Software to be Sold, Leased or Marketed,” development costs incurred in the research and development of new software products are expensed as incurred until technological feasibility, in the form of a working model, has been established, at which time such costs are capitalized until the product is available for general release to customers. The Company did not capitalize any software development costs during 2017 or 2016. The Company makes ongoing evaluations of the recoverability of its capitalized software projects by comparing the net amount capitalized for each product to the estimated net realizable value of the product. If such evaluations indicate that the unamortized software development costs exceed the net realizable value, the Company writes off the amount by which the unamortized software development costs exceed net realizable value (see Note 3).

Revenue Recognition

Revenue Recognition. The Company markets and licenses products indirectly through channel distributors, independent software vendors (“ISVs”), value-added resellers (“VARs”) (collectively “resellers”) and directly to corporate enterprises, governmental and educational institutions and others. Its product licenses are perpetual. The Company also separately sells intellectual property licenses, maintenance contracts (which are comprised of license updates and customer service access), and other products and services.

 

For the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2017, software license revenues were recognized when:

 

  Persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists (i.e., when the Company signs a non-cancelable license agreement wherein the customer acknowledges an unconditional obligation to pay, or upon receipt of the customer’s purchase order), and
     
  Delivery has occurred or services have been rendered and there are no uncertainties surrounding product acceptance (i.e., when title and risk of loss have been transferred to the customer, which generally occurs when the media containing the licensed program(s) is provided to a common carrier or, in the case of electronic delivery, when the customer is given access to the licensed programs), and
     
  The price to the customer is fixed or determinable, as typically evidenced in a signed non-cancelable contract, or a customer’s purchase order, and
     
  Collectability is probable. If collectability is not considered probable, revenue is recognized when the fee is collected.

 

Revenue recognized on software arrangements involving multiple deliverables is allocated to each deliverable based on vendor-specific objective evidence (“VSOE”) or third party evidence of the fair values of each deliverable; such deliverables include licenses for software products, maintenance, private labeling fees, or customer training. The Company limits its assessment of VSOE for each deliverable to either the price charged when the same deliverable is sold separately or the price established by management having the relevant authority to do so, for a deliverable not yet sold separately.

 

If sufficient VSOE of fair value does not exist, so as to permit the allocation of revenue to the various elements of the arrangement, all revenue from the arrangement is deferred until such evidence exists or until all elements are delivered. If VSOE of the fair value does not exist and the only undelivered element is maintenance, then we recognize revenue on a ratable basis. If VSOE of the fair value of all undelivered elements exists but evidence does not exist for one or more delivered elements, then revenue is recognized using the residual method. Under the residual method, the fair value of the undelivered elements is deferred and the remaining portion of the arrangement fee is recognized as revenue.

 

Certain resellers (“stocking resellers”) purchase product licenses that they hold in inventory until they are resold to the ultimate end-user (an “inventory stocking order”). At the time that a stocking reseller places an inventory stocking order, no product licenses are shipped by the Company to the stocking reseller rather, the stocking reseller’s inventory is credited with the number of licenses purchased and the stocking reseller can resell (issue) any number of licenses from their inventory at any time. Upon receipt of an order to issue one or more licenses from a stocking reseller’s inventory (a “draw down order”), the Company will ship the licenses(s) in accordance with the draw down order’s instructions. The Company defers recognition of revenue from inventory stocking orders until the underlying licenses are sold and shipped to the end user, as evidenced by the receipt and fulfillment of the stocking reseller’s draw down order, assuming all other revenue recognition criteria have been met.

 

There are no rights of return granted to purchasers of the Company’s software products.

 

Effective January 1, 2018, ASC 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, changed the recognition of revenue standards for reporting periods beginning after December 31, 2017.

 

In May 2014, FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2014-09 “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606)” (“ASU 2014-09”). Subsequently FASB has released several updates to ASU 2014-09 including ASU 2016- 20, ASU 2016-12, ASU-2016-10, ASU-2016-08, and ASU-2015-14. The effective date for ASU 2014-09 is January 1, 2018. The new standard supersedes nearly all existing revenue recognition standards. The Company expects to adopt this standard using the modified retrospective approach. The Company has substantially completed its assessment of the new standard, but is continuing to assess potential impacts primarily related to upgrade rights held by a limited number of customers. We believe the most significant change to the timing and amount of revenue recognition under the new standard is related to our stocking orders. Under the current standard, we defer substantially all of the licensing revenue associated with stocking orders until delivery to the end user. Under the new standard, substantially all licensing revenue from stocking orders will be recognized at the time the licenses are delivered to our customers, who are generally resellers or distributors. Based upon our agreements with our customers, we believe that under the new standard, the ownership rights and rewards of the software licenses have been transferred. Due to this change, we anticipate that we will record substantially all of our deferred licensing revenue to retained earnings under the modified retrospective approach in Q1 2018.

 

As a result of the adoption of ASU NO. 2014-09 we expect our annual and quarterly revenues to be subject to greater variability.

 

Revenue is recognized from maintenance contracts ratably over the related contract period, which generally ranges from one to five years.

 

All of the Company’s software licenses are denominated in U.S. dollars.

Deferred Rent

Deferred Rent. The leases for both of the Company’s subleased former offices in Campbell, California contain free rent and predetermined fixed escalations in our minimum rent payments (See Notes 7 and 12). Rent expense related to these leases is recognized on a straight-line basis over the terms of the leases. Any difference between the straight-line rent amounts and amounts payable under the leases is recorded as part of deferred rent in current or long-term liabilities, as appropriate. The monthly rent payments due to the Company for the sublease of the office at 1919 S. Bascom Avenue fully offsets the rent payments due under the Company’s lease for that space.

 

Incentives received upon entering into the lease agreement are recognized on a straight-line basis as a reduction to rent over the term of the lease. The unamortized portion of these incentives are recorded as a part of deferred rent in current or long-term liabilities, as appropriate.

Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

Allowance for Doubtful Accounts. The Company maintains an allowance for doubtful accounts that reflects our best estimate of potentially uncollectible trade receivables. Such allowance is based on assessments of the collectability of specific customer accounts and the general aging and size of the accounts receivable. We regularly review the adequacy of our allowance for doubtful accounts by considering such factors as historical experience, credit worthiness, and current economic conditions that may affect a customer’s ability to pay. We specifically reserve for those accounts deemed uncollectible. We also establish, and adjust, a general allowance for doubtful accounts based on our review of the aging and size of our accounts receivable. The following table illustrates the details of the Allowance for Doubtful Accounts for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016:

 

    Beginning
Balance
    Charge Offs     Recoveries     Provision     Ending
Balance
 
2017   $ 7,700     $     $     $ 100     $ 7,800  
2016   $ 17,300     $ (3,700 )   $     $ (5,900 )   $ 7,700  

Income Taxes

Income Taxes. In accordance with FASB ASC 740-10-05, “Income Taxes,” the Company performed a comprehensive review of uncertain tax positions as of December 31, 2017. In this regard, an uncertain tax position represents the expected treatment of a tax position taken in a filed tax return, or planned to be taken in a future tax return, that has not been reflected in measuring income tax expense for financial reporting purposes.

 

The Company and one or more of its subsidiaries are subject to United States federal income taxes, as well as income taxes of multiple state and foreign jurisdictions. The Company and its subsidiaries are no longer subject to U.S. federal, state and local, or non-U.S. income tax examinations by tax authorities for years prior to 2011. There are no tax examinations currently underway for any of the Company’s or its subsidiaries’ tax returns for years subsequent to 2010.

 

The Company’s policy for deducting interest and penalties is to treat interest as interest expense and penalties as taxes. The Company had not accrued any amount for the payment of interest or penalties related to any uncertain tax positions at either December 31, 2017 or 2016, as its review of such positions indicated that such potential positions were minimal.

 

Under FASB ASC 740-10-05, “Income Taxes,” deferred income taxes are recognized for the tax consequences of temporary differences between the financial statement and income tax bases of assets, liabilities and net loss carryforwards using enacted tax rates. Valuation allowances are established, when necessary, to reduce deferred tax assets to the amount that is more likely than not expected to be realized. Realization is dependent upon future pre-tax earnings, the reversal of temporary differences between book and tax income, and the expected tax rates in effect in future periods.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

Fair Value of Financial Instruments. The fair value of the Company’s accounts receivable, accounts payable and other current liabilities approximate their carrying amounts due to the relative short maturities of these items.

 

The fair value of the Company’s warrants are determined in accordance with FASB ASC 820, “Fair Value Measurement,” which establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the assumptions (inputs) to valuation techniques used to price assets or liabilities that are measured at fair value. The hierarchy, as defined below, gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs. The guidance for fair value measurements requires that assets and liabilities measured at fair value be classified and disclosed in one of the following categories:

 

  Level 1: Defined as observable inputs, such as quoted (unadjusted) prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.

 

  Level 2: Defined as observable inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1. This includes quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar assets and liabilities in markets that are not active, or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities.
     
  Level 3: Defined as unobservable inputs to the valuation methodology that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the measurement of the fair value of the assets or liabilities. Level 3 assets and liabilities include those whose fair value measurements are determined using pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies or similar valuation techniques, as well as significant management judgment or estimation.

 

As of December 31, 2017 and 2016, the Company did not have any Warrants Liability reported.

Derivative Financial Instruments

Derivative Financial Instruments. The Company currently does not have a material exposure to either commodity prices or interest rates; accordingly, it does not currently use derivative instruments to manage such risks. The Company evaluates all of its financial instruments to determine if such instruments are derivatives or contain features that qualify as embedded derivatives. All derivative financial instruments are recognized in the balance sheet at fair value. Changes in fair value are recognized in earnings if they are not eligible for hedge accounting or in other comprehensive income if they qualify for cash flow hedge accounting.

Long-Lived Assets

Long-Lived Assets. Long-lived assets are assessed for possible impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amounts may not be recoverable, whenever the Company has committed to a plan to dispose of the assets or, at a minimum, annually. Typically, for long-lived assets to be held and used, measurement of an impairment loss is based on the fair value of such assets, with fair value being determined based on appraisals, current market value, comparable sales value, and undiscounted future cash flows, among other variables, as appropriate. Assets to be held and used affected by an impairment loss are depreciated or amortized at their new carrying amount over their remaining estimated life; assets to be sold or otherwise disposed of are not subject to further depreciation or amortization. During 2017 and 2016, we determined that there was an impairment of $0 and $15,500, respectively, associated with certain capitalized software development expense (see Note 3).

Loss Contingencies

Loss Contingencies. The Company is subject to the possibility of various loss contingencies arising in the ordinary course of business. The Company considers the likelihood of the loss or impairment of an asset or the incurrence of a liability as well as its ability to reasonably estimate the amount of loss in determining loss contingencies. An estimated loss contingency is accrued when it is probable that a liability has been incurred or an asset has been impaired and the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated. The Company regularly evaluates current information available to it to determine whether such accruals should be adjusted. No such loss contingency was recorded during the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016.

Stock-Based Compensation

Stock-Based Compensation. The Company applies the fair value recognition provisions of FASB ASC 718-10, “Compensation – Stock Compensation.

 

Valuation and Expense Information Under FASB ASC 718-10

 

The Company recorded stock-based compensation expense of $13,400 and $324,400 in the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively. No expense was capitalized related to software development. As required by FASB ASC 718-10, the Company estimates forfeitures of employee stock-based awards and recognizes compensation cost only for those awards expected to vest. Forfeiture rates are estimated based on an analysis of historical experience and are adjusted to actual forfeiture experience as needed.

 

During 2016, we awarded 35,000 shares of restricted common stock to seven members of our board of advisors. The valuation of the restricted common stock awards was based on the closing fair market value of our common stock on the grant date. For these awards, such fair market value was $1.65 per share. These shares were canceled in the three month period ended September 2016.

 

For stock options granted, the Company set the exercise price equal to the closing fair market value of the Company’s common stock as of the grant date. No options were issued during the years ended December 31 2017 and 2016.

 

The following table illustrates the non-cash stock-based compensation expense recorded during the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 by income statement classification:

 

    2017     2016  
Cost of revenue   $ 100     $ 5,600  
Selling and marketing expense     200       69,200  
General and administrative expense     13,000       156,000  
Research and development expense     100       93,600  
    $ 13,400     $ 324,400  

 

Estimated compensation expense is based on the estimated fair value of each option granted on the date of grant using a binomial model, using the estimated annualized forfeiture rate based on an analysis of historical data and considered the impact of events such as work force reductions we carried out in previous years. The expected term of our stock-based awards was based on historical award holder exercise patterns and considered the market performance of our common stock and other items. The estimated exercise factor was based on an analysis of historical data; historical exercise patterns; and a comparison of historical and current share prices. The approximate risk free interest rate was based on the implied yield available on U.S. Treasury issues with remaining terms equivalent to our expected term on our stock-based awards.

 

The Company used the average historical volatility of its daily closing price for a period of time equal in length to the expected option term for the option being issued. The period of time over which historical volatility was measured ended on the last day of the quarterly reporting period during which the stock-based award was made.

 

The Company does not anticipate paying dividends on its common stock for the foreseeable future.

Earnings Per Share of Common Stock

Earnings Per Share of Common Stock. FASB ASC 260-10, “Earnings Per Share,” provides for the calculation of basic and diluted earnings per share. Basic earnings per share includes no dilution and is computed by dividing net income or loss attributable to common shareholders by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted earnings per share reflects the potential dilution of securities by adding other common stock equivalents, including common stock options, warrants, and unreleased (unvested) restricted stock awards in the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for a period, if dilutive. Potentially dilutive securities are excluded from the computation if their effect is antidilutive. For the year ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, 1,153,287 and 1,382,841, respectively, common shares equivalents were excluded in the computation of diluted earnings per share since its effect would be antidilutive.

Comprehensive Loss

Comprehensive Loss. FASB ASC 220-10, “Reporting Comprehensive Income,” establishes standards for reporting comprehensive income and its components in a financial statement that is displayed with the same prominence as other financial statements. Comprehensive income, as defined, includes all changes in equity (net assets) during the period from non-owner sources. Examples of items to be included in comprehensive income, which are excluded from net income, include foreign currency translation adjustments and unrealized gain/loss of available-for-sale securities. The individual components of comprehensive income (loss) are reflected in the consolidated statement of operations. For the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, there were no changes in equity (net assets) from non-owner sources.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

Recent Accounting Pronouncements.

 

In May 2014, FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2014-09 “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606)” (“ASU 2014-09”). Subsequently FASB has released several updates to ASU 2014-09 including ASU 2017-17, ASU 2017-13, ASU 2016- 20, ASU 2016-12, ASU-2016-10, ASU-2016-08, and ASU-2015-14. The effective date for ASU 2014-09 is January 1, 2018. See discussion of the impact of this new standard in the Revenue Recognition section of this note above.