10-Q 1 t1300625_10q.htm FORM 10-Q

 

 

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

Form 10-Q

 

(Mark One)

x Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2013

 

¨ Transition Report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

For the transition period from______________ to _______________

 

Commission File Number: 000-26213

 

ROOMLINX, INC.

 

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 

Nevada  83-0401552
(State or other jurisdiction of  (I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization) Identification No.)

 

11101 W. 120th Ave., Suite 200, Broomfield, Colorado 80021

(Address of principal executive offices)

 

(303) 544-1111

(Issuer's telephone number)

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes x No ¨

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).

 

Yes x No ¨

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

 

  Large accelerated filer ¨ Accelerated filer ¨
  Non-accelerated filer ¨ Smaller reporting company x

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

Yes ¨ No x

 

The number of shares outstanding of the Issuer's common stock as of November 12, 2013, was 6,411,413.

 

 
 

 

ROOMLINX, INC.

 

INDEX

 

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION  
   
Item 1. Financial Statements 3
   

Consolidated Balance Sheets as of September 30, 2013 (unaudited) and December 31, 2012

3
   

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Loss for the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2013 and 2012 (unaudited)

4
   
Consolidated Statement of Changes in Deficit as of September 30, 2013 (unaudited) 5
   

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2013 and 2012 (unaudited)

6
   

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)

7
   

Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

17
   
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk 28
   

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

28
   
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION  
   
Item 1. Legal Proceedings 31
   
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds 31
   
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities 31
   
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures 31
   
Item 5. Other Information 31
   
Item 6. Exhibits 31
   

Signatures

32

 

2

 

Roomlinx, Inc.

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

 

   September 30   December 31, 
   2013   2012 
   (unaudited)     
ASSETS        
Current assets:          
Cash and cash equivalents  $1,788,309   $3,211,182 
Accounts receivable, net   1,856,489    1,761,503 
Leases receivable, current portion   857,405    995,220 
Prepaid and other current assets   146,091    115,902 
Inventory, net   2,659,378    3,308,792 
Total current assets   7,307,672    9,392,599 
           
Property and equipment, net   521,067    790,873 
Leases receivable, non-current   1,024,065    1,672,245 
Total assets  $8,852,804   $11,855,717 
           
LIABILITIES AND DEFICIT          
           
Current liabilities:          
Line of credit, net of discount, current portion  $340,000   $- 
Accounts payable   4,255,286    5,079,204 
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities   422,031    668,012 
Customer deposits   1,123,448    1,125,248 
Notes payable and other obligations, current portion   21,414    21,884 
Unearned income, current portion   119,766    187,540 
Deferred revenue, current portion   731,287    609,988 
Total current liabilities   7,013,232    7,691,876 
           
Deferred revenue, less current portion   270,238    294,963 
Notes payable and other obligations, less current portion   30,899    47,691 
Unearned income, less current portion   91,768    198,404 
Line of credit, net of discount, less current portion   3,923,696    4,007,177 
           
Total liabilities   11,329,833    12,240,111 
           
Deficit:          
Preferred stock - $0.20 par value, 5,000,000 shares authorized:          
Class A - 720,000 shares authorized, issued and outstanding (liquidation preference of $144,000)   144,000    144,000 
Common stock - $0.001 par value, 200,000,000 shares authorized:          
6,411,413 and 6,405,413 shares issued and outstanding at September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively   6,411    6,405 
Additional paid-in capital   37,352,957    36,971,369 
Accumulated deficit   (40,029,283)   (37,571,896)
Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income   (849)   7,684 
Total Roomlinx, Inc. shareholders' deficit   (2,526,764)   (442,438)
Non-controlling interest   49,735    58,044 
Total deficit   (2,477,029)   (384,394)
Total liabilities and deficit  $8,852,804   $11,855,717 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

 

3

  

Roomlinx, Inc.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE LOSS

for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012

(unaudited)

 

   Three Months Ended September 30,   Nine Months Ended September 30, 
   2013   2012   2013   2012 
Revenues:                
Hospitality:                    
Product and installation  $1,404,535   $1,254,998   $2,879,357   $2,954,406 
Services   1,359,827    910,601    4,020,554    2,414,351 
Residential:                    
Services   223,868    221,615    659,185    691,384 
Total   2,988,230    2,387,214    7,559,096    6,060,141 
                     
Direct costs and operating expenses:                    
Direct costs (exclusive of operating expenses and depreciation shown seperately below):                    
Hospitality   1,948,081    1,918,368    5,209,077    4,862,279 
Residential   151,909    145,675    486,189    485,237 
Operating expenses:                    
Operations   256,269    628,638    1,052,499    1,550,403 
Product development   163,137    312,076    636,686    837,586 
Selling, general and administrative   600,270    737,066    2,042,856    1,995,343 
Depreciation   92,519    191,389    276,715    559,364 
Loss on asset impairment   -    1,112,470    -    1,112,470 
    3,212,185    5,045,682    9,704,022    11,402,682 
Operating loss   (223,955)   (2,658,468)   (2,144,926)   (5,342,541)
                     
Non-operating income (expense):                    
Interest expense   (168,190)   (157,259)   (465,947)   (450,455)
Interest income   44,217    86,279    145,177    224,188 
Other income   -    181,962    -    181,962 
    (123,973)   110,982    (320,770)   (44,305)
                     
Net loss   (347,928)   (2,547,486)   (2,465,696)   (5,386,846)
                     
Less: net (income) loss attributable to the non-controlling interest   2,875    (7,850)   8,309    (4,790)
                     
Net loss attributable to the Company   (345,053)   (2,555,336)   (2,457,387)   (5,391,636)
                     
Other comprehensive (loss) income:                    
Currency translation (loss) gain   (21,283)   29,766    (8,533)   22,375 
                     
Comprehensive loss   (366,336)   (2,525,570)   (2,465,920)   (5,369,261)
                     
Comprehensive loss attributable to the non-controlling interest   -    -    -    - 
                     
Comprehensive loss attributable to the Company   $(366,336)  (2,525,570)  $ (2,465,920)  $(5,369,261)
                     
Net loss per common share:                    
Basic and diluted  $(0.05)  $(0.40)  $(0.38)  $(0.93)
                     
Weighted average shares outstanding:                    
Basic and diluted   6,407,630    6,404,631    6,406,160    5,803,265 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

 

4

  

Roomlinx, Inc.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN DEFICIT

for the nine months ended September 30, 2013

(unaudited)

 

   Roomlinx, Inc. Shareholders         
                       Accumulated             
   Preferred Stock A   Common Stock   Additional   Other           Total 
   Number of   Par Value   Number of   Par Value   Paid - in   Comprehensive   Accumulated   Non-Contolling   Stockholders' 
   Shares   $0.20   Shares   $0.001   Capital   Income (Loss)   (Deficit)   Interest   (Deficit) Equity 
Balances, January 1, 2013   720,000   $144,000    6,405,413   $6,405   $36,971,369   $7,684   $(37,571,896)  $58,044   $(384,394)
                                              
Restricted shares of common stock vested             6,000    6    11,994                   12,000 
Stock based compensation                       369,594                   369,594 
Comprehensive income (loss):                                             
Net loss                                 (2,457,387)   (8,309)   (2,465,696)
Translation loss                            (8,533)             (8,533)
                                              
Balances, September 30, 2013   720,000   $144,000    6,411,413   $6,411   $37,352,957   $(849)  $(40,029,283)  $49,735   $(2,477,029)

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

 

5

 

Roomlinx, Inc.

CONSOLIDATED CASH FLOW STATEMENTS

for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012

(unaudited)

 

   2013   2012 
Cash flows from operating activities:        
Net loss  $(2,465,696)  $(5,386,846)
           
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:          
Depreciation   276,715    559,364 
Amortization of debt discount   256,519    246,614 
Stock-based compensation   369,594    420,679 
Compensation cost related to restricted stock issuances   13,118    - 
Settlement of royalty payable   -    (179,834)
Provision for uncollectable accounts and leases receivable   107,218    100,211 
Reserve for inventory obsolescence   -    22,500 
Asset impairment   -    1,112,470 
Change in operating assets and liabilities:          
Accounts receivable   (119,435)   (592,176)
Prepaid and other current assets   (30,189)   (400,782)
Inventory   649,414    (2,348,144)
Accounts payable and other liabilities   (1,071,018)   2,375,361 
Customer deposits   (1,800)   - 
Unearned income   (174,410)   (161,803)
Deferred revenue   96,574    2,408,709 
Total adjustments   372,300    3,563,169 
Net cash used in operating activities:   (2,093,396)   (1,823,677)
           
Cash flows from investing activities:          
Lease financing provided to customers   -    (142,879)
Payments received on leases receivable   703,226    721,739 
Purchase of property and equipment   (16,540)   (183,789)
Net cash provided by investing activities:   686,686    395,071 
           
Cash flows from financing activities:          
Proceeds from sale of common stock, net   -    2,993,311 
Proceeds from the line of credit   -    1,000,000 
Proceeds from notes payable   -    45,000 
Payments on capital lease   (8,344)   (9,700)
Payments on notes payable   (8,918)   (47,824)
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities   (17,262)   3,980,787 
           
Effects of foreign currency translation   1,099    17,584 
           
Net (decrease) increase in cash and equivalents   (1,422,873)   2,569,765 
Cash and equivalents at beginning of period   3,211,182    361,228 
Cash and equivalents at end of period  $1,788,309   $2,930,993 
           
Supplemental cash flow information:          
Cash paid for interest  $213,201   $202,231 
           
Non-cash investing and financing activities:          
Restricted stock vested  $12,000   $- 
Assets acquired under capital lease  $-   $34,617 
Warants isssed in connection with line of credit  $-   $350,167 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

 

6

 

Roomlinx, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

September 30, 2013

(Unaudited)

 

1.     Organization and Significant Accounting Policies

 

Description of Business:    Roomlinx, Inc. (“Roomlinx” or the “Company”) is incorporated under the laws of the state of Nevada. The Company sells, installs, and services in-room media and entertainment solutions for hotels, resorts, and time share properties; including its proprietary Interactive TV platform, internet, and free to guest and video on demand programming. Roomlinx also sells, installs and services telephone, internet, and television services for residential consumers. The Company develops software and integrates hardware to facilitate the distribution of Hollywood, adult, and specialty content, business applications, national and local advertising, and concierge services. The Company also sells, installs and services hardware for wired networking solutions and wireless fidelity networking solutions, also known as Wi-Fi, for high-speed internet access to hotels, resorts, and time share locations. The Company installs and creates services that address the productivity and communications needs of hotel, resort and time share guests, as well as residential consumers.

 

Basis of Consolidation:    The consolidated financial statements include Roomlinx, Inc. and its wholly-owned subsidiaries, Canadian Communications LLC, Cardinal Connect, LLC, Cardinal Broadband, LLC, and Arista Communications, LLC, a 50% subsidiary, controlled by the Company. Canadian Communications and Cardinal Connect, LLC, are non-operating entities. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

 

Basis of Presentation: The accompanying consolidated unaudited financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for interim financial information.  They do not include all of the information and footnotes required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for complete financial statements.  In the opinion of management, all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments considered necessary for a fair presentation, have been included in the accompanying unaudited financial statements.  Operating results for the periods presented are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the full year.  For further information, refer to the financial statements and notes thereto, included in the Company's Form 10-K as of and for the year ended December 31, 2012.

 

Reclassification: Certain amounts in the 2012 financial statements have been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation.

 

Going Concern and Management Plans: The Company has experienced recurring losses and negative cash flows from operations. At September 30, 2013, the Company had approximate balances of cash and cash equivalents of $1,790,000, working capital of $290,000, total deficit of $2,480,000 and accumulated deficit of $40,000,000. To date the Company has in large part relied on debt and equity financing to fund its shortfall in cash generated from operations. As of September 30, 2013, the Company has available approximately $19,800,000 under its line of credit, however, as described below, any borrowings under the line of credit could be limited.

 

As described in Note 7, on May 4, 2013, the Company executed a Fourth Amendment to the Revolving Credit, Security and Warrant Purchase Agreement previously entered into by them on June 5, 2009 (the “Original Agreement”). Pursuant to the Amendment, the Original Agreement has been amended to provide that the making of any and all Revolving Loans (as defined in the Original Agreement) shall be at the sole and absolute discretion of Cenfin. Accordingly, the Company’s ability to borrow under the line of credit is at the discretion of the lender, and there are no assurances that the lender will permit the Company to borrow under the line of credit. Management is closely monitoring the cash balances, cash needs and expense levels and has implemented a cost reduction plan. Accordingly, the Company’s cash balance has remained relatively constant through the three months ended September 30, 2013. If the Company is unable to borrow additional funds under the line of credit or obtain financing from alternative sources, the Company estimates its current cash and cash equivalents are sufficient to fund operations for at least the next twelve months. These factors raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. The accompanying financial statements do not include any adjustments to reflect the possible future effects on the recoverability and classification of assets or the amounts and classification of liabilities that might result should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern.

 

7

  

Accounts Receivable:    Accounts receivables are uncollateralized customer obligations due under normal trade terms requiring payment within 30 days from the invoice date. Accounts receivable are stated at the amount billed to the customer. Accounts receivable in excess of 30 days old are considered delinquent. Outstanding customer invoices are periodically assessed for collectability. The assessment and related estimate are based on current credit-worthiness and payment history. As of September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, the Company recorded an allowance of approximately $253,000 and $229,000, respectively.

 

Revenue Recognition:    Revenue is derived from the installation and ongoing services of in-room media, entertainment, and HD television programming solutions in addition to wired networking solutions and Wireless Fidelity networking solutions. Revenue is recognized when all applicable recognition criteria have been met, which generally include a) persuasive evidence of an existing arrangement; b) fixed or determinable price; c) delivery has occurred or service has been rendered; d) collectability of the sales price is reasonably assured.

 

Installations and service arrangements are contractually predetermined and such contractual arrangements may provide for multiple deliverables, revenue is recognized in accordance with ASC Topic 605, Multiple Deliverable Revenue. The application of ASC Topic 605 may result in the deferral of revenue recognition for installations across the service period of the contract and the re-allocation and/or deferral of revenue recognition across various service arrangements. Below is a summary of such application of the revenue recognition policy as it relates to installation and service arrangements the Company has with its customers.

 

The Company enters into contractual arrangements to provide multiple deliverables which may include some or all of the following - systems installations and a variety of services related to high speed internet access, free-to-guest, video on demand and iTV systems as well as residential phone, internet and television. Each of these elements must be identified and individually evaluated for separation. The term “element” is used interchangeably with the term “deliverable” and the Company considers the facts and circumstances as it relates to its performance obligations in the arrangement and includes product and service elements, a license or right to use an asset, and other obligations negotiated for and assumed in the agreement. Analyzing an arrangement to identify all of the elements requires the use of judgment. In the determination of the elements included in Roomlinx agreements, embedded software and inconsequential or perfunctory activities were taken into consideration.

 

Once the Deliverables have been identified, the Relative Fair Value of each Element was determined under the concept of Relative Selling Price (RSP) for which the Company applied the hierarchy of selling price under ASC Topic 605 as follows:

 

VSOE - Vendor specific objective evidence is still the most preferred criteria with which to establish fair value of a deliverable. VSOE is the price of a deliverable when a company sells it on an open market separately from a bundled transaction.

TPE - Third party evidence is the second most preferred criteria with which to establish fair value of a deliverable. The measure for the pricing of this criterion is the price that a competitor or other third party sells a similar deliverable in a similar transaction or situation.

RSP - Relative selling price is the price that management would use for a deliverable if the item were sold separately on a regular basis which is consistent with company selling practices. The clear distinction between RSP and VSOE is that under VSOE, management must sell or intend to sell the deliverable separately from the bundle, or has sold the deliverable separately from the bundle already. With RSP, a company may have no plan to sell the deliverable on a stand-alone basis.

 

Hospitality Installation Revenues

 

Hospitality installations include High Speed Internet Access (HSIA), Interactive Television (iTV), Free to Guest (FTG) and Video on Demand (VOD). Under the terms of these typical product sales and equipment installation contracts, a 50% deposit is due at the time of contract execution and is recorded as deferred revenue. Upon the completion of the installation process, deferred revenue is realized. However, in some cases related to VOD installations or upgrades, the Company extends credit to customers and records a receivable against the revenue recognized at the completion of the installation.

 

Additionally, the Company may provide the customer with a lease financing arrangement provided the customer has demonstrated its credit worthiness to the satisfaction of the Company. Under the terms and conditions of the lease arrangements, these leases have been classified and recorded as Sale-Type Leases under ASC Topic 840-30 and accordingly, revenue is recognized upon completion and customer acceptance of the installation which gives rise to a lease receivable and unearned income.

 

8

 

Hospitality Service, Content and Usage Revenues

 

The Company provides ongoing 24x7 support to both its hotel customers and their guests, content and maintenance as applicable to those products purchased, installed and serviced under contract. Generally, support is invoiced in arrears on a monthly basis with content and usage, which are dependent on guest take rates and buying habits. Service maintenance and usage revenue also includes revenue from meeting room services, which are billed as the events occur.

 

Residential Revenues

 

Residential revenues consist of equipment sales and installation charges, support and maintenance of voice, internet, and television services, and content provider residuals, installation commissions, and management fees. Installations charges are added to the monthly service fee for voice, internet, and television, which is invoiced in advance creating deferred revenue to be realized in the appropriate period. The Company’s policy prohibits the issuance of customer credits during the month of cancelation. The Company earns residuals as a percentage of monthly customer service charges and a flat rate for each new customer sign up. Residuals are recorded monthly. Commissions and management fees are variable and therefore revenue is recognized at the time of payment.

 

Concentrations

 

Credit Risk:    The Company's operating cash balances are maintained in financial institutions and periodically exceed federally insured limits. The Company believes that the financial strength of these institutions mitigates the underlying risk of loss. To date, these concentrations of credit risk have not had a significant impact on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.

 

Accounts Receivable: At September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, Hyatt Corporation-controlled properties represented 42% and 49%, respectively of accounts receivable, and other Hyatt properties in the aggregate represented 33% and 29%, respectively, of accounts receivable.

 

Revenue:  During the three months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, Hyatt Corporation-controlled properties contributed 29% and 28%, respectively, and other Hyatt properties in the aggregate contributed 56% and 43%, respectively, of Roomlinx’s US Hospitality revenue.  Additionally, one customer contributed 54% to Roomlinx’s Canadian hospitality revenue in 2013 versus contributing 55% in 2012.

 

During the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, Hyatt Corporation-controlled properties contributed 25% and 38%, respectively, and other Hyatt properties in the aggregate contributed 55% and 29%, respectively, of Roomlinx’s US Hospitality revenue.  Additionally, one customer contributed 53% to Roomlinx’s Canadian hospitality revenue in 2013 versus contributing 54% in 2012.

 

Fair Value Measurement:   The Company discloses fair value information about financial instruments based on a framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting principles, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. Fair value estimates discussed herein are based upon certain market assumptions and pertinent information available to management as of September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012.

 

The respective carrying value of certain financial instruments approximate their fair values. These financial instruments include cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, leases receivable, accounts payable, capital lease obligations, notes payable and the line of credit. The carrying value of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, leases receivable, and accounts payable approximate fair value due to their short term nature. The carrying amount of capital lease obligations and notes payable approximates their fair values as the pricing and terms of these liabilities approximate market rates. The fair value of the line of credit is not practicable to estimate because of the related party nature of the underlying transactions. The Company has no financial instruments with the exception of cash and cash equivalents (level 1) valued on a recurring basis.

 

Long-Lived Assets: The Company reviews the carrying value of long-lived assets, such as property and equipment, whenever events or circumstances indicate the carrying value of an asset may not be recoverable from the estimated future cash flows expected to result from its use and eventual disposition. In cases where undiscounted expected future cash flows are less than the carrying value, an impairment loss is recognized to reduce the carrying value of the asset to its estimated fair value.

 

9

 

Segments: We operate and prepare our financial reports based on two segments; Hospitality and Residential. We have determined these segments based on the location, design, and end users of our products.

 

Hospitality: Our Hospitality segment includes hotels, resorts, and timeshare properties in the United States, Canada, and Other Foreign. As of September 30, 2013 and 2012, Other Foreign included Mexico and Aruba. The products offered under our hospitality segment include the installation of, and the support and service of, high-speed internet access networks, proprietary Interactive TV platform, free to guest programming, and on-demand movie programming, as well as advertising and e-commerce products.

 

Residential: Our residential segment includes multi-dwelling unit customers and business customers (non-hospitality) in the United States. The products offered include the installation of, and the support and service of, telephone, internet, and television services.

 

Foreign Currency Translation:    The US Dollar is the functional currency of the Company. Assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are re-measured into US Dollars and the resulting gains and losses are included in the consolidated statements of comprehensive loss as a component of other income (expense).

 

Earnings (Loss) Per Share:    The Company computes earnings (loss) per share by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted average number of shares of common stock and dilutive common stock equivalents outstanding during the period. Dilutive common stock equivalents consist of shares issuable upon the exercise of the Company's stock options and warrants. Potentially dilutive securities, purchase stock options and warrants, are excluded from the calculation when their inclusion would be anti-dilutive, such as periods when a net loss is reported or when the exercise price of the instrument exceeds the fair market value. Accordingly, the weighted average shares outstanding have not been adjusted for dilutive shares. Outstanding stock options and warrants are not considered in the calculation as the impact of the potential common shares (totaling approximately 2,440,720 and 2,477,541 shares as of September 30, 2013 and September 30, 2012, respectively) would be to decrease the net loss per share.

 

Use of Estimates: The preparation of the Company’s consolidated financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires the Company’s management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

 

2.    Leases Receivable

 

As of September 30, 2013, the Company had $1,881,470 in leases receivables compared to $2,802,465 at December 31, 2012, less a reserve for uncollectible accounts of $0 and $135,000, respectively. During the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012 the Company received payments of $703,226 and $721,739, respectively. The Company did not enter into any new leases in the nine months ended September 30, 2013; and during the nine months ended September 30, 2012, the Company entered into one lease receivable in the amount of $142,879. These leases have terms of 60 months and an average interest rate of 9.5%. In addition, during the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, the Company recorded a loss of $82,768 and $60,211 respectively, related to the early termination of lease receivable contracts. These amounts are net of the return of equipment to inventory and are included in direct costs in the consolidated statements of comprehensive loss.

 

Future minimum receipts on lease receivables are as follows:

 

Twelve Months ended
September 30,
  Minimum Receipts 
2014  $857,405 
2015   650,661 
2016   307,957 
2017   65,447 
   $1,881,470 

 

10

 

3.    Inventory

 

Inventory, principally large order quantity items which are required for the Company’s media and entertainment installations, is stated at the lower of cost (first-in, first-out) basis or market. The Company generally maintains only the inventory necessary for contemplated installations. Work in progress represents the cost of equipment and third party installation related to installations which were not yet completed.

 

The Company performs an analysis of slow-moving or obsolete inventory periodically and any necessary valuation reserves, which could potentially be significant, are included in the period in which the evaluations are completed. As of September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, the inventory obsolescence reserve was mainly related to raw materials and results in a new cost basis for accounting purposes.

 

Inventory balances as of September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012 are as follows:

 

   2013   2012 
Raw materials  $2,381,470   $2,546,441 
Work in process   397,908    882,351 
    2,779,378    3,428,792 
Reserve for obsolescence   (120,000)   (120,000)
Inventory, net  $2,659,378   $3,308,792 

 

4.    Asset Impairment

 

The Company’s wholly-owned subsidiary, Cardinal Hospitality, Ltd. (“CHL”) provides video-on-demand (“VOD”) utilizing proprietary technology to approximately 130 hotel properties in Canada (“the CHL properties”). The CHL properties are primarily economy-class hotels.

 

During the three months ended September 30, 2012, the Company determined that it would no longer utilize its proprietary VOD system in future VOD service installations. Rather than invest in upgrading or refreshing its proprietary technology, the Company determined it would purchase a third-party platform for all future VOD installations. In addition, it concluded that its primary business strategy and technology development efforts will be focused on its proprietary interactive TV platform. Due to the economy class nature of the CHL properties, management determined that the interactive TV platform is not appropriate for deployment at those properties. Consequently, while services provided to the CHL properties will continue, no significant new business development will be pursued.

 

As a result of this strategic change we performed an evaluation as of September 30, 2012 of our long-lived assets associated with the CHL properties consisting primarily of property, plant, and equipment and property receivables. In assessing impairment for long-lived assets we followed the provisions of ASC 360. We performed our testing of the asset group at the individual property level, and our assessment included contractual terms and identifiable cash flows associated with providing on-going service.

 

In performing the test, we determined that the total of the expected future undiscounted cash flows directly related to services provided at the CHL properties was less than the carrying value of the asset group. Therefore, an impairment charge was required. An impairment charge of approximately $920,000 and $47,000 related to PP&E and property receivables, respectively, represented the difference between the fair values of the asset group and its carrying values and is reflected as Loss on asset impairment in the consolidated statements of comprehensive loss for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012. The impairment charges resulted from the excess of the carrying value of the asset group over the fair value (calculated based on the discounted expected future cash flows associated with VOD and free to guest services during the underlying contractual period).

 

In addition, we performed an analysis of the value of inventory held by CHL to determine the impact of the change in business strategy, as of September 30, 2012. We determined that a write off of approximately $146,000 was required to reflect the obsolete nature of the inventory associated with VOD service. The charge is included in the Loss on asset impairment in the consolidated statements of comprehensive loss for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012.

 

11

 

5.    Settlement of Royalty Payable

 

In November 2011, the Company entered into a revised license agreement for studio films. Under the terms of the agreement, the Company was required to pay $105,000 in four equal quarterly payments to settle all previous amounts due to a studio. In August 2012, the Company made the final payment resulting in a gain on the settlement of royalty payable in the amount of $179,834, such amount representing the excess of the accrued liability less the agreed upon settlement of $105,000. The settlement of royalty payable is included in other income on the consolidated statements of comprehensive loss for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012.

 

6.     Notes Payable

 

The Company has a note payable with a principal balance of $33,843 at September 30, 2013 versus three notes payable with an aggregate principal balance of $42,761 at December 31, 2012. This note bears interest at 11%, and expires August 1, 2016. Monthly principal and interest payments total $1,163.

 

7.     Line of Credit

 

On June 5, 2009, the Company entered into a Revolving Credit, Security and Warrant Purchase Agreement (the “Credit Agreement”) with Cenfin LLC, an entity principally owned by significant shareholders of the Company. The Credit Agreement permits us to borrow up to $25 million until June 5, 2017. On May 3, 2013, the Company and Cenfin executed a fourth amendment to the Credit Agreement which provided Cenfin sole and absolute discretion related to funding any advance requested by Roomlinx. Advances must be repaid at the earlier of 5 years from the date of borrowing or at the expiration of the Credit Agreement. The principal balance may be repaid at any time without penalty. Borrowings accrue interest, payable quarterly on the unpaid principal and interest at a rate equal to the Federal Funds Rate at July 15 of each year plus 5% (approximately 5.19% at September 30, 2013). The Credit Agreement is collateralized by substantially all of our assets, and requires the Company to maintain a total outstanding indebtedness to total assets ratio of less than 3 to 1.

 

Amounts outstanding under the Credit Agreement were $5,176,000 at September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012. These advances will be repaid at various dates between 2014 and 2017. A total of $19,824,000 is available for future borrowings, subject to the terms of the amended agreement. Interest expense of $190,252 and $196,846, exclusive of accretion of the debt discount of $256,519 and $246,614, was recorded for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. The unamortized balance of the debt discount was $912,304 and $1,168,823 at September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively.

 

The Credit Agreement requires that, in conjunction with each advance, we issue Cenfin warrants to purchase shares of Roomlinx common stock equal to 50% of the principal amount funded divided by (i) $2.00 on the first $5,000,000 of borrowings on or after July 15, 2010 ($4,712,000 as of September 30, 2013) or (ii) thereafter the fair market value of the Company’s common stock on the date of such draw for advances in excess of $5,000,000. The exercise price of the warrants is $2.00 for the warrants issued on the first $5,000,000 of borrowings made after July 15, 2010 and, thereafter, the average of the high and low market price for the Company’s common stock on the date of issuance. The exercise period of these warrants expire three years from the date of issuance.

 

Future minimum payments against the line of credit are as follows:

 

Twelve Months ended
September 30,
  Minimum
Payments
 
2014  $340,000 
2015   1,106,000 
2016   2,130,000 
2017   1,600,000 
   $5,176,000 

 

12

 

8.     Commitments and Contingencies

 

Operating Leases:    On April 10, 2012 the Company executed a lease agreement for office space with an effective date of May 1, 2012. Terms of the lease established a base rent per square foot plus operating expenses throughout the term of the lease which expires September 30, 2015, and which includes the lessor waiving several months of base rent and pre-defined annual escalation of the base rent per square foot. The Company had a deferred rent liability of $52,259 and $55,025 included in other liabilities as of September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively. The Company has future minimum lease payments of $137,764 and $152,085 during the twelve months ended September 30, 2014 and 2015, respectively.

 

Capital Lease Obligations:  The Company has a capital lease arrangement related to the acquisition of software. These arrangements are collateralized by the software and expire in March 2015 with future minimum lease payments as follows: $12,036 and $6,434 for the twelve month periods ended September 30, 2014 and 2015, respectively.

 

9.     Equity

 

Preferred Stock:    The Company has authorized 5,000,000 preferred shares with a $0.20 par value, of which 720,000 shares have been designated as Class A Preferred Stock. The Class A Preferred stock has a liquidation preference of $0.20 per share and is entitled to receive cumulative annual dividends at the rate of 9%, payable in either cash or additional shares of Class A Preferred Stock, at the option of the Company. As of September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012 there were 720,000 shares of Class A Preferred Stock issued and outstanding. Undeclared Class A dividends accumulated and unpaid as of September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, were $194,880 and $185,160, respectively; these dividends are not included in accrued expenses.

 

Common Stock:    The Company has authorized 200,000,000 shares of $0.001 par value common stock. As of September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, there were 6,411,413 and 6,405,413 shares of common stock issued and outstanding, respectively.

 

During the nine months ended September 30, 2013, the Company granted 24,000 restricted shares of common stock at a fair market value of $2.00 per share (equal to the closing price of the Company’s common stock quoted on the NASDAQ Bulletin Board Service as of the grant date) to three non-employee directors of the Company. The shares vest in equal annual installments beginning on August 27, 2013 through 2015.

 

As of July 31, 2013, one of the non-employee directors resigned resulting in the forfeiture of 6,000 restricted shares of common stock. During the nine months ended September 30, 2013, the Company recognized non-employee director compensation cost of $13,118 recorded in selling, general and administrative expenses in the consolidated statement of comprehensive loss and in accrued expenses in the accompanying balance sheet.

 

Warrants: 

 

As of September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, the Company had 1,542,800 warrants outstanding of which, 902,800 warrants were issued in connection with the line of credit (see Note 7).

 

During the nine months ended September 30, 2012, 250,000 warrants were granted pursuant to clauses in the Cenfin Credit Agreement. The warrants were issued at an exercise price of $2.00 per share, vested immediately and expire three years from the date of grant. In addition, 640,000 warrants were issued pursuant to clauses in the Stock Purchase Agreement dated May 4, 2012, between the Company and certain investors. These warrants were issued at an exercise price of $3.75 per share, vested immediately and expire three years from the date of grant. No warrants were issued in the nine month period ended September 30, 2013.

 

The following are assumptions utilized in estimation of the fair value of the warrants issued during the nine month period ended September 30, 2012:

 

    2012  
Term   3 years  
Expected volatility   108% - 148%  
Risk free interest rate   0.35% - 0.57%  
Dividend yield   0%  

 

13

 

The following is a summary of such outstanding warrants for the nine month period ended September 30, 2013:

 

Warrants  Shares
Underlying
Warrants
   Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
   Weighted
Remaining
Contractual
Life (in years)
   Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
 
Outstanding at January 1, 2013   1,542,800   $2.84       
Granted and Issued   -    -           
Expired/Cancelled   -    -           
Outstanding and exercisable at September 30, 2013   1,542,800   $2.84    1.22   $- 

 

Options:

 

In 2004, the Company adopted a long term incentive stock option plan (the “Stock Option Plan”) which covers key employees, officers, directors and other individuals providing bona fide services to the Company. On December 27, 2012, subject to stockholder approval, the board of directors voted to amend the Stock Option Plan to (i) adjust the maximum allowable shares of common stock upon exercise of options which may be granted from 1,200,000 to 2,000,000 shares of common stock and (ii) remove the provision from the Stock Option Plan which provided that any shares that are surrendered to or withheld by the Company in connection with any award or that are otherwise forfeited after issuance shall not be available for purchase pursuant to incentive stock options intended to qualify under Section 422 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. As of September 30, 2013, options to purchase 897,920 shares were outstanding. The options vest as determined by the Board of Directors and are exercisable for a period of no more than 10 years.

 

On January 11, 2013, the board of directors approved the grant of 30,000 Incentive Stock Options at an exercise price of $2.06 per share. These options vest ratably on the anniversary date over a three year period and expire 7 years from the grant date. The weighted average grant date fair value of such options was $1.68.

 

Pursuant to the execution of the Hyatt MSA, on March 14, 2012 the board of directors approved the grant of 500,000 stock options (“Hyatt options”) at a strike price of $4.00 per share vesting on a pro rata basis over three years or the acceleration of such vesting rights relative to installation performance metrics at the Hyatt properties as defined by the board of directors, whichever is greater, and expiring 7 years from the date of grant. On December 27, 2012, the board of directors approved re-pricing the Hyatt options from the exercise price of $4.00 per share to $2.10 per share ($0.10 above the closing price per the NASDAQ OTC Bulletin as of that date), resulting in a change to the expected volatility and risk free interest rate as previously reported.

 

On June 14, 2013, the Company had outstanding options to purchase an aggregate of 925,027 shares of common stock, of which options to purchase 300,833 shares of common stock were Hyatt Options, when the Board determined to reduce the exercise price of a total of 354,445 of the non-Hyatt Options to $0.60 per share (the closing price of the common stock on June 14, 2013 was $0.60 per share). None of the Options subject to the exercise price reduction are Hyatt Options.

 

The following are the assumptions utilized in the estimation of stock-based compensation related to the stock option grants for the nine month periods ended September 30, 2013 and September 30, 2012:

 

    2013   2012  
Expected term   7 years   7 years  
Expected volatility   213%   218% - 225%  
Risk free interest rate   1.28%   1.11% - 1.69%  
Dividend yield   0%   0%  

 

A summary of stock option activity under the Stock Option Plan is presented below:

 

   Number of
Shares
   Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
   Remaining
Contractual 
Life (in
years)
   Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
 
Outstanding at January 1, 2013   1,086,074   $2.74           
Granted   30,000    0.60           
Forfeited   (218,154)   2.27           
Outstanding at September 30, 2013   897,920   $1.60    4.90   $- 
Exercisable at September 30, 2013   428,314   $1.78    3.78   $- 

 

14

 

The Company recorded stock-based compensation expense of $369,594 and $420,679 for the nine month periods ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. The amounts are recorded in selling, general and administrative expense in the consolidated statements of comprehensive loss. The fair value of stock options that vested and became exercisable during the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012 was $334,618 and $24,620 respectively. At September 30, 2013, there was approximately $1,100,000 in unrecognized compensation cost related to stock options that will be recorded over a weighted average future period of approximately 3 years.

 

A summary of the activity of non-vested options under the Company’s plan for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 is presented below:

 

   Non-vested
Shares
Underlying
Options
   Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
   Weighted
Average
Grant Date
Fair Value
 
Non-vested at January 1, 2013   763,363   $2.16   $1.95 
Granted   30,000    0.60    0.60 
Vested   (151,683)   1.91    1.82 
Forfeited   (172,074)   2.20    1.96 
Non-vested at September 30, 2013   469,606   $1.43   $1.33 

 

10.      Segment Information

 

Financial information for our segment as of and for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, is as follows:

 

   Hospitality   Residential   Corporate   Totals 
Three months ended September 30, 2013                    
Revenue  $2,764,362   $223,868   $-   $2,988,230 
Operating income (loss)  $153,921   $(41,477)  $(336,399)  $(223,955)
Net income (loss)  $29,948   $(41,477)  $(336,399)  $(347,928)
                     
Three months ended September 30, 2012                    
Revenue  $2,165,599   $221,615   $-   $2,387,214 
Operating loss  $(2,181,514)  $(45,306)  $(431,648)  $(2,658,468)
Net loss  $(1,985,025)  $(45,306)  $(517,155)  $(2,547,486)
                     
Nine months ended September 30, 2013                    
Revenue  $6,899,911   $659,185   $-   $7,559,096 
Operating loss  $(717,272)  $(242,943)  $(1,184,711)  $(2,144,926)
Net loss  $(1,038,042)  $(242,943)  $(1,184,711)  $(2,465,696)
                     
Nine months ended September 30, 2012                    
Revenue  $5,368,757   $691,384   $-   $6,060,141 
Operating loss  $(4,114,148)  $(111,821)  $(1,116,572)  $(5,342,541)
Net loss  $(3,909,414)  $(111,821)  $(1,365,611)  $(5,386,846)
                     
As of September 30, 2013                    
Total assets  $8,563,448   $206,717   $82,639   $8,852,804 

 

15

 

Financial information of geographical data by segment as of and for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, is as follows:

 

   United States   Canada   Other Foreign   Totals 
Three months ended September 30, 2013                    
Hospitality:                    
Product and installation  $1,404,535   $-   $-   $1,404,535 
Services   1,234,474    115,081    10,272   $1,359,827 
Residential:                    
Services   223,868    -    -   $223,868 
Totals  $2,862,877   $115,081   $10,272   $2,988,230 
                     
Three months ended September 30, 2012                    
Hospitality:                    
Product and installation  $1,254,998   $-   $-   $1,254,998 
Services   695,502    189,334    25,765   $910,601 
Residential:                    
Services   221,615    -    -   $221,615 
Totals  $2,172,115   $189,334   $25,765   $2,387,214 
                     
Nine months ended September 30, 2013                    
Hospitality:                    
Product and installation  $2,879,357   $-   $-   $2,879,357 
Services   3,476,251    369,187    175,116   $4,020,554 
Residential:                    
Services   659,185    -    -   $659,185 
Totals  $7,014,793   $369,187   $175,116   $7,559,096 
                     
Nine months ended September 30, 2012                    
Hospitality:                    
Product and installation  $2,954,406   $-   $-   $2,954,406 
Services   1,816,736    494,204    103,411   $2,414,351 
Residential:                    
Services   691,384    -    -   $691,384 
Totals  $5,462,526   $494,204   $103,411   $6,060,141 
                     
As of September 30, 2013                    
Total assets  $8,150,455   $477,861   $224,488   $8,852,804 

 

16

 

11.Contingent Liabilities

 

The Company is in receipt of a District Court Civil Summons, dated May 29, 2012, in the matter of “CLC Networks, Inc. and Skada Capital, LLC v. Roomlinx, Inc.”, commenced in the District Court of Boulder County, Colorado (the “Action”). The plaintiffs in the Action claim that the Company owes them certain unpaid sales commissions, including with respect to Hyatt Corporation in connection with that certain Master Services and Equipment Purchase Agreement, as described in the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 13, 2012. The Company believes the plaintiffs’ claims are without merit. The Action is currently pending.

 

The Company is in receipt of a letter from Technology Integration Group ("TIG") demanding payment of approximately $2,430,000 with respect to inventory and services which the Company purchased from TIG. The amount (net of payments made in 2013) is recorded in accounts payable in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets as of September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012. TIG subsequently filed an action in California State Court although the Company has not yet been served in such action. The Company believes that it has meritorious defenses and counterclaims in respect of TIG's claim. The Company intends to pursue a settlement of all claims with TIG and is in discussions with TIG in respect thereof.

 

The Company is in receipt of a request for indemnification from Hyatt in connection with a case brought in US Federal Court in California by Ameranth, Inc., against, among others, Hyatt. In connection with such case, the plaintiffs have identified the Company’s e-concierge software as allegedly infringing Ameranth’s patents. The Company licenses the e-concierge software from a third party and accordingly has made a corresponding indemnification request to such third party. The Company believes that any such claim may also be covered by the Company’s liability insurance coverage and accordingly the Company does not expect that this matter will result in any material liability to the Company.

 

The Company is in receipt of a District Court Civil Summons, dated August 23, 2013, in the matter of “ScanSource v. Roomlinx, Inc.”, commenced in the District Court of Greenville County, South Carolina (the “Action”). The plaintiffs in the Action claim that the Company owes them approximately $473,000 with respect to inventory which the Company purchased. The amount is recorded in accounts payable in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets as of September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012. The Company intends to pursue a settlement of all claims.

 

The Company is in receipt of a letter from the BSA Software Alliance (“BSA”) in connection with copyright infringement of computer software products alleging the unauthorized duplication of various computer software products. BSA has threatened to file an action against the Company if it does not timely respond to its request for an internal audit. The Company intends to review BSA’s claims and respond appropriately.

 

Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

 

The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” section and the consolidated financial statements and related notes thereto included in our December 31, 2012 Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed with the SEC and with the unaudited interim financial statements and related notes thereto presented in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, as well as our reports on Form 8-K and other SEC filings.

 

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

 

This report contains or incorporates forward-looking statements within the meaning of the federal securities laws that involve risks and uncertainties. Statements regarding future events, developments, the Company’s future performance, as well as management’s expectations, beliefs, intentions, plans, estimates or projections relating to the future are forward-looking statements within the meaning of these laws. We develop forward-looking statements by combining currently available information with our beliefs and assumptions. These statements relate to future events, including our future performance, and management’s expectations, beliefs, intentions, plans or projections relating to the future and some of these statements can be identified by the use of forward-looking terminology such as “believes,” “expects,” “anticipates,” “estimates,” “projects,” “intends,” “seeks,” “future,” “continue,” “contemplate,” “would,” “will,” “may,” “should,” and the negative or other variations of those terms or comparable terminology or by discussion of strategy, plans, opportunities or intentions. As a result, actual results, performance or achievements may vary materially from those anticipated by the forward-looking statements. These statements include, among others:

 

- statements concerning the benefits that we expect will result from our business activities and results of exploration that we contemplate or have completed, such as increased revenues; and

- statements of our expectations, beliefs, future plans and strategies, anticipated developments and other matters that are not historical facts.

 

17

 

Among the factors that could cause actual results, performance or achievements to differ materially from those indicated by such forward-looking statements are:

 

the inability of the Company to obtain financing in order for the Company to maintain operations;

the continued suspension of certain obligations of the Company and Hyatt pursuant to the Master Service Agreement with Hyatt (“MSA”) or the removal of such obligations from the MSA;
the Company’s successful implementation of new products and services (either generally or with specific key customers);
the Company’s ability to satisfy the contractual terms of key customer contracts;
demand for the new products and services, the volume and timing of systems sales and installations, the length of sales cycles and the installation process and the possibility that our products will not achieve or sustain market acceptance;
un-expected changes in technologies and technological advances and ability to commercialize and manufacture products;
the timing, cost and success or failure of new product and service introductions, development and product upgrade releases;
the Company’s ability to successfully compete against competitors offering similar products and services;
the Company’s ability to establish and maintain strategic relationships, including the risk that key customer contracts may be terminated before their full term;
general economic and business conditions;
errors or similar problems in our products, including product liabilities;
the outcome of any legal proceeding that has been or may be instituted against us and others and changes in, or failure to comply with, governmental regulations;
our ability to attract and retain qualified personnel;
maintaining our intellectual property rights and litigation involving intellectual property rights;
legislative, regulatory and economic developments;
risks related to third-party suppliers and our ability to obtain, use or successfully integrate third-party licensed technology;
breach of our security by third parties; and
those factors discussed in “Risk Factors” in our periodic filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”).

 

We make these statements under the protection afforded by Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Because forward-looking statements are subject to assumptions and uncertainties, actual results, performance or achievements may differ materially from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Stockholders are cautioned not to place undue reliance on such statements, which speak only as of the date such statements are made. Except to the extent required by applicable law or regulation, Roomlinx undertakes no obligation to revise or update any forward-looking statement, or to make any other forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

 

GENERAL

 

Currently we offer the following services to our customers:

 

vSite-specific determination of needs and requirements;
vDesign and installation of the wireless or wired network;
vCustomized development, design and installation of a media and entertainment system;
vIP-based delivery of on-demand high-definition and standard-definition programming including Hollywood, Adult, and specialty content;
vDelivery of free-to-guest (“FTG”) television programming via satellite;
vDelivery of an interactive (“click and go”) programming guide;
vFull maintenance and support of the network and Interactive TV product;
vTechnical support to assist guests, hotel staff, and residential and business customers, 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, 365 days a year;
vDelivery of an advertising and E-commerce platform through iTV.

 

18

 

Overview

 

Roomlinx, Inc., a Nevada corporation ("we," "us" or the "Company"), provides four core products and services:

 

In-room media and entertainment

 

Roomlinx provides a suite of in-room media and entertainment products and services for hotels, resorts, and time share properties. Products and services included within our in-room media and entertainment offering include our proprietary Interactive TV platform (“iTV”) and on-demand movies.

 

The Company develops proprietary software and integrates hardware to facilitate the distribution of its Interactive TV platform. With Roomlinx, iTV guests will have access to a robust feature set through the HDTV such as:

 

Internet Apps including Netflix, Pandora, Hulu, YouTube, Facebook, and many more
International and U.S. television programming on demand
Click and Go TV program guide or Interactive Program Guide (“IPG”)
Web Games
MP3 player and thumb drive access
Ability to send directions from the iTV system to a mobile device

 

Hotel guests can also easily order room service, interact with hotel associates, make restaurant reservations, edit and print documents as well as gain direct access to local dining, shopping, nightlife, cultural events or attractions all through a dynamic user interface on the TV. The Interactive TV platform integrates the TV and Internet experience.

 

The Company provides proprietary software, a media console and an extended USB port for the hotel guest, a proprietary wireless keyboard with built-in mouse, and a proprietary remote control with a built in mouse. The Company installs and supports these components.

 

The Company also supplies video-on-demand services to the hospitality industry. Roomlinx offers a full selection of video-on-demand services and technology; including first non-theatrical release Hollywood motion pictures, adult, and specialty content.

 

Hotel customers sign long-term service agreements, where we provide the maintenance for the networks, as well as the right to provide value added services over the network.

 

The Company generates revenue through:

 

Ongoing connectivity service and support contracts
Network design and installation services
Delivery of content and advertising
Delivery of business and entertainment applications
E-commerce
The customization of its software
Software licensing
Delivery of pay-per-view content
Sale of video-on-demand systems

 

Free-To-Guest Television Programming (“FTG”).

 

Our hotel satellite television programming services provide for delivery and viewing of high definition and standard definition television programming for hotels, resorts, and time share properties. The Company installs and provides services that address the entertainment and information needs of hotel guests and resort guests. We specialize in providing advanced high definition equipment for delivering digital television programming such as ESPN, HBO, Starz, and other specialty and local channels.

 

The Company generates revenue through:

 

The design and installation of FTG systems
Delivery of television programming fees and/or commissions

 

Customers typically pay a one-time fee for the installation of the equipment and then pay monthly programming fees for delivery of a specific TV channel lineup.

 

19

 

Wired Networking Solutions and Wireless Fidelity Networking Solutions.

 

We provide wired networking solutions and wireless fidelity networking solutions, also known as Wi-Fi, for high speed internet access at hotels, resorts, and timeshare locations. The Company installs and creates services that address the productivity and communications needs of hotel, resort, and timeshare guests. We specialize in providing advanced Wi-Fi wireless services such as the wireless standards known as 802.11a/b/g/n/i.

 

Hotel customers sign long-term service agreements, where we provide the maintenance for the networks, as well as the right to provide value added services over the network.

 

The Company generates revenue through:

 

Ongoing connectivity service and support contracts
Network design and installation services

 

Customers typically pay a one-time fee for the installation of the network and then pay monthly maintenance fees for the upkeep and support of the network.

 

Residential Media and Communications

 

We provide residential and business customers telecommunication services including telephone, satellite television, and wired and wireless internet access. Telephone service is provided through traditional, analog “twisted pair” lines, as well as digital voice over internet protocol (“VoIP”) Analog phone service is typically provided via an interconnection agreement with CenturyLink, Inc. (formerly Qwest Communications), which allows the Company to resell CenturyLink service through their wholesale and retail accounts with CenturyLink. VoIP service is provided at properties where the Company maintains a broadband internet service to the end customer, allowing the Company to provide digital phone service (VoIP) over the same lines as their internet service.

 

Television service is typically provided via the Company’s agreements with DISH Network and DirecTV. Most television service to customers is provided via a head-end distribution system, or an L-Band digital distribution system. Television service is offered in high definition whenever possible.

 

Internet service is provided via both wired and wireless network design. The Company provisions and manages broadband access to the residential customers through both wholesale and resale methods. Wholesale methods exist when the Company owns and controls the internet circuit and resale methods exist when the Company uses an affiliated third party to provide the internet circuit.

 

The Company generates revenue through:

 

Network design and installation services
Delivery of telephone service (billed monthly)
Delivery of Internet service (billed monthly)
Delivery of television service (billed by the satellite provider with monthly commissions paid to the Company)
Management fees for the management of affiliated communication systems

 

Recent Financial Developments

 

On March 12, 2012, Roomlinx and Hyatt Corporation entered into a Master Services and Equipment Purchase Agreement (the “MSA”) pursuant to which Roomlinx has agreed to provide in-room media and entertainment solutions, including its proprietary Interactive TV (or iTV) platform, high speed internet, free-to-guest, on-demand programming and related support services, to Hyatt-owned, managed or franchised hotels that are located in the United States, Canada and the Caribbean. Roomlinx’s media and entertainment solutions may be provided in the “full option” (Interactive TV) or the “lite option” (Video on Demand).

 

Pursuant to the MSA, we have agreed to make financing available to hotels that exceed certain minimum credit criteria for the purchase of equipment necessary for the provision of the Services at annual interest rates of no greater than 11.5% per annum and subject to certain restrictions and limitations. The amount of financing that Roomlinx is required to provide will not exceed the lesser of (i) the amount of installation fees that are payable by Hyatt-owned hotels under Hotel Service Agreements that have not elected to receive equipment financing or (ii) $11 million. To date, no financing has been requested by Hyatt properties.

 

The MSA terminates on the later of (i) 60 days following the five year anniversary of the effective date or (ii) if any Hotel Services Agreement is in effect on such five year anniversary, then the MSA will continue to apply to such Hotel Services Agreement until it expires. The MSA may be terminated by Hyatt in the event (i) Roomlinx is in breach of certain obligations under the MSA, (ii) Roomlinx is subject to bankruptcy, assignment for the benefit of its creditors, is in receivership or similar proceeding or (iii) in the event of a delegation, transfer, assignment, change of control or ownership by Roomlinx or the sale of all or substantially all of its assets.

 

20

 

In March 2012, Roomlinx and Hyatt entered into the MSA which provided for, among other things, the obligation of Hyatt to order and to use its commercially reasonable efforts to cause its managed hotels to order the installation of the Company’s iTV product in a minimum number of rooms in Hyatt hotels within certain time frames measured from March 2012, subject to Roomlinx’s satisfaction of certain other conditions of the MSA.

 

In December of 2012, Hyatt had met certain obligations to place orders with Roomlinx for its systems and services. In December 2012, Roomlinx and Hyatt mutually agreed to suspend certain Hyatt obligations under the MSA that had not been met, including the suspension of the obligations of Hyatt to cause a certain number of rooms in both Hyatt owned and managed properties to place orders for Roomlinx’s iTV products within certain time frames measured from the original execution of the MSA. At the time of the December 2012 suspension of these Hyatt obligations, the Company had installed certain services and products in approximately 19,000 rooms (including approximately 9,000 installs of its iTV product) in Hyatt hotels and by the end of January 2013, had executed Statements of Work with other Hyatt hotels to install its iTV product in approximately an additional 4,600 rooms, and in connection with such Statements of Work, had received deposits from such hotels in the aggregate amount of approximately $1.3 million.  As of September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, such deposits are recorded as customer deposits in the accompanying balance sheet in the amount of approximately $1,123,000 and $1,125,000, respectively.

 

The Company and Hyatt continue to hold discussions regarding the treatment of the additional 4,600 rooms and related deposits. The Company recently completed installation of approximately 1,000 of these rooms. Moreover, Hyatt Hotels continues to place orders for certain Roomlinx products and services.

 

Trends and Business Outlook

 

Our goal is to be the leading provider of all facets of in-room entertainment, programming and internet connectivity. We believe that we are developing the scale, capacity, and reach to respond to customers’ needs quickly and that our product offerings differentiate us from other market participants in terms of usability, technical innovation and breadth of offerings.  Over the past year, we have taken significant steps towards these goals and in the first quarter of 2012 we signed a master services agreement with Hyatt Corporation. We believe there has been a fundamental shift in the way people communicate and from where they get their content.  This shift is affecting guest habits within the hotel room. Hotel guests are getting their content from the internet or alternative mobile sources, such as laptops and smartphones.  Roomlinx developed the Interactive TV platform to embrace these changing habits and allow guests easy access to their content, work, and the internet via the in-room flat panel LCD.  We have seen strong usage of the Interactive TV platform at our current hotel installations and we believe there is even greater ability to monetize our Interactive TV platform as we increase hotel penetration and usage.  We believe our Interactive TV platform creates a true differentiation for Roomlinx and we will continue to invest in product enhancements and Interactive TV sales and marketing efforts.  These investments and enhancements will be focused on meeting the desires of hotel guests in a manner consistent with hotel needs.

 

To this end, our sales and product initiatives are aimed at accelerating market penetration by significantly reducing the cost of installation while still meeting the needs of hotel guests and generating an attractive gross margin.  Roomlinx continues development of its iTV Mobile product and believes it is the next progression in the Roomlinx product offerings.  Roomlinx iTV brings the internet, content and guest services to the hotel room TV, Roomlinx iTV Mobile expands the benefits of iTV to guests’ personal devices.  We believe iTV Mobile will accelerate market penetration by allowing properties to choose between full iTV integration or a more cost effective iTV mobile option.

 

The Company believes the benefits of iTV Mobile include:

Low cost installation option for hotels, which allows for a disruptive business model.
Significantly lower cost for Roomlinx to service and support.
Expanded market opportunity to attract limited service hotels with a lower cost installation
Rapid installation ensures less ‘down time’ for hotel rooms to be offline
Opportunity to license software allowing for accelerated market penetration
Guest will appreciate multiple options to access media and entertainment through personal devices
Strong recurring revenue model for Roomlinx – targeted at $3-$4 per room per month with approximately a 90% gross margin.
Provides for a new service offering and revenue stream for hotels.

 

21

 

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES  

 

Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations discuss our financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. The preparation of these financial statements requires management to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and the related disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities. On an on-going basis, management evaluates its estimates and judgments, including those related to revenue recognition, allowance for doubtful accounts and property and equipment valuation. Management bases its estimates and judgments on historical experience and on various other factors that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions and conditions.

 

Management believes the following critical accounting policies, among others, affect its more significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of its consolidated financial statements.

 

The Company enters into contractual arrangements to provide multiple deliverables which may include some or all of the following - systems installations and a variety of services related to high speed internet access, free-to-guest programming, video on demand, and iTV as well as residential phone, internet and television. Each of these elements must be identified and individually evaluated for separation. The term “element” is used interchangeably with the term “deliverable” and the Company considers the facts and circumstances as it relates to its performance obligations in the arrangement and includes product and service elements, a license or right to use an asset, and other obligations negotiated for and assumed in the agreement. Analyzing an arrangement to identify all of the elements requires the use of judgment, however, once the deliverables have been identified, the Relative Fair Value of each Element was determined under the concept of Relative Selling Price (RSP) for which the Company applied the hierarchy of selling price under ASU Topic 650.

 

The effect of application of this standard may be to defer revenue recognition for installations across the service period of the contract and to re-allocate and/or defer revenue recognition across various service arrangements.

 

In order to promote the Interactive TV platform, Roomlinx has agreed to provide certain customers with direct sales-type lease financing to cover the cost of installation. These transactions result in the recognition of revenue and associated costs in full upon the customer’s acceptance of the installation project and give rise to a lease receivable and unearned income.

 

We estimate the collectability of our trade receivables. A considerable amount of judgment is required in assessing the ultimate realization of these receivables, including analysis of historical collection rates and the current credit-worthiness of significant customers.

 

Inventory includes materials on-hand at our warehouses as well as the cost of hardware, software, and labor which has been incurred by us for installation at our customer’s property, but has not been accepted by the customer.

 

Since inception, we have accumulated substantial net operating loss carry forwards for tax purposes. There are statutory limitations on our ability to realize any future benefit from these potential tax assets and we are uncertain as to whether we will ever utilize the tax loss carry forwards. Accordingly, we have recorded a valuation allowance to offset the deferred tax asset.

 

The Company provides compensation costs for our stock option plans determined in accordance with the fair value based method to estimate the fair value of each stock option at the grant date by using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model and provide for expense recognition over the service period, if any, of the stock option.

 

In connection with the sale of debt or equity instruments, we may sell options or warrants to purchase our common stock. In certain circumstances, these options or warrants may be classified as derivative liabilities, rather than as equity. Additionally, the debt or equity instruments may contain embedded derivative instruments, such as conversion options, which in certain circumstances may be required to be bifurcated from the associated host instrument and accounted for separately as a derivative instrument liability.

 

22

  

ASU No 2013-02, which became effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2012, provided guidance on the disclosure of significant amounts of components of accumulated other comprehensive income. The Company adopted this ASU effective January 1, 2013. The adoption of this ASU did not have a material impact on our consolidated results of operations or footnote disclosure.

 

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

 

The Company measures its performance and recurring revenue trend based on the number of revenue generating units (“RGUs”) in service. Regarding the hospitality sector, a hotel room may have one or more RGUs. An RGU is defined as a product or service for which we invoice the hotel monthly, including interactive television, video on demand, free to guest programming, and high speed internet access. Residential properties may also have more than one RGU, which includes telephone, internet and television. As of September 30, 2013 the Company was servicing approximately 86,000 RGUs within the hospitality sector representing a net increase of 34,000 RGUs or 65%, within the hospitality sector over the twelve months ended September 30, 2012, and 16 residential communities and small businesses, representing an additional 2,500 RGUs.

 

THREE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2013 COMPARED TO THREE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2012

 

Our revenues for the three months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012 were $2,988,230 and $2,387,214 respectively, an increase of $601,016 or 25%, reflecting an increase in hospitality recurring service revenue of approximately $449,000, or 49%, and an increase in product and installation revenue of approximately $150,000, or 12%. The increase in our recurring revenue is the result of a net addition of approximately 34,000 RGUs placed into service during the twelve months ended September 30, 2013.

 

Direct costs exclusive of operating expenses and depreciation (“direct costs”) for the three months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012 were $2,099,990 and $2,064,043 respectively, an increase of $35,947 or 2%. Direct costs of hospitality installations increased approximately $98,000. Direct costs of recurring services decreased approximately $133,000, or 12%; the result is primarily related to the release of system patches to our hotels reducing the need for hotel site visits by contractors, complemented by the conversion of call center contractors to full time employees.

 

Hospitality 

 

The hospitality segment includes hotel and meeting rooms in the following geographic segments: United States, Canada, and Other Foreign. As of September 30, 2013 and 2012, Other Foreign included Mexico and Aruba. The products offered under our hospitality segment include the installation of, and the support and service of, high-speed internet access, interactive TV services, free to guest programming, and on-demand programming, as well as advertising and e-commerce products.

 

United States: US hospitality revenue for the three months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012 was $2,639,009 and $1,950,500 respectively, an increase of $688,509 or 35%. This increase is attributable to an increase in recurring service revenue of approximately $539,000 or 77%, the result of a net increase of approximately 33,000 RGUs to 69,000 RGUs in service at September 30, 2013, and an increase in product and installation revenue of approximately $150,000 or 12%.

 

Canada: Canadian hospitality revenue for the three months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012 was $115,081 and $189,334 respectively, a decrease of $74,253 or 39%. In part due to management’s decision not to invest in a declining business segment through funding hotel upgrades of their video on demand systems, nor the hotel’s willingness to finance such upgrades, several Canadian properties have either terminated or decided not to renew their contract with the Company. Also contributing to the decrease in revenue is the hotel guests seeking alternative technologies in viewing content in lieu of purchasing video on demand films.

 

23

  

Other Foreign: Other foreign hospitality revenue for the three months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012 was $10,272 and $25,765, respectively, a decrease of $15,493. This decrease is primarily the result of the loss of a resort hotel.

 

Residential

 

Our residential segment includes multi-dwelling unit and business customers in the United States. The products offered include the installation of, and the support and service of, telephone, internet, and television services.

 

Residential revenue for the three months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012 was $223,868 and $221,615 respectively, an increase of $2,253, or 1%.

 

Operational Expenses

 

Total operating expense for the three months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012 was $1,112,195 and $2,981,639, a decrease of $1,869,444, or 63%. This decrease is primarily due to a cost reduction and containment program wherein the Company realized a 39% decrease in personnel, reducing payroll and related costs approximately $623,000, and a decline of approximately $99,000 of depreciation expense related to the impaired assets pursuant to the recognition of a $1,112,470 impairment charge in 2012.

 

Our operations department expense decreased $372,369 to $256,269 in the three months ended September 30, 2013 compared to the same period in 2012. This decrease is primarily due to a decrease in personnel, reducing payroll and related costs approximately $303,000.

 

Our product development department expense decreased $148,939 to $163,137 in the three months ended September 30, 2013 compared to same period in 2012. This decrease is primarily due to a decrease in personnel, reducing payroll and related costs approximately $144,000.

 

Our selling, general and administrative expenses decreased $136,796 to $600,270 in the three months ended September 30, 2013 compared to the same period in 2012. This decrease is primarily attributable to approximate fluctuations as follows: (i) payroll and related costs, including stock based compensation decreased $176,000, (ii) professional fees decreased $26,000, offset by an increase in bad debt expense of $70,000.

 

Depreciation expense for the three months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012 was $92,519 and $191,389 respectively, a decrease of $98,870 or 52%. This decrease reflects the reduction in depreciation attributable to the impairment recorded at September 30, 2012.

 

During the three months ended September 30, 2012 the Company recognized a $1,112,470 loss on the impairment of assets due to circumstances (see note 4) indicating the carrying value of Cardinal Hospitality, Ltd. (“CHL”) assets would not be recoverable from the estimated future cash flows expected to result from their use and eventual disposition. This loss resulted in the write-down of approximately $920,000 of property and equipment, $146,000 of inventory and $46,000 of property receivables.

 

Our operating loss for the three months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012 was $223,955 and $2,658,468 respectively, a decrease of $2,434,513 or 92%. This decrease is primarily attributable to the cost savings achieved through the Company’s 2013 cost reduction and containment program, as described above, and the 2012 recognition of a $1,112,470 impairment charge. For the three months ended September 31, 2013 and 2012, continuing operational expenses, which consist of operating, product development, and selling, general and administrative costs were, as a percentage of recurring revenue, 64% and 148%, respectively, or a decline of 84% of recurring revenue.

 

Non-Operating

 

For the three months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, our non-operating income was $44,217 and $268,241 respectively. The decrease of $224,024 is primarily due the recognition of a $179,834 gain realized in 2012 on the settlement of a royalty payable and a decrease of $42,062 in interest income earned on lease receivables as a result of (i) three less properties under lease as of September 30, 2013 as compared to September 30, 2012 and (ii) under the imputed interest method, the recognition of interest income declines over time.

 

24

 

Our non-operating expenses for the three months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012 were $168,190 and $157,259 respectively, an increase of $10,931. Non-operating expenses are primarily interest expense and the fluctuation is attributable to an adjustment to the Federal Funds Rate applied to the Cenfin line of credit in 2012.

 

For the three months ended September 30, 2013, we reported a net loss of $347,928, compared to a net loss of $2,547,486 for the three months ended September 30, 2012, a reduction of net loss of $2,199,558, or 86%. This decrease is primarily attributable to the cost savings achieved through the Company’s 2013 cost reduction and containment program, as described above, and the 2012 recognition of a $1,112,470 impairment charge.

 

NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2013 COMPARED TO NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2012

 

Our revenues for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012 were $7,559,096 and $6,060,141 respectively, an increase of $1,498,955 or 25%, reflecting an increase in hospitality recurring service revenue of approximately $1,606,000, or 67%, offset by a decrease in product and installation revenue of approximately $75,000, or 3%. The increase in our recurring revenue is the result of a net addition of approximately 34,000 RGUs placed into service over the twelve months ended September 30, 2013.

 

Direct costs exclusive of operating expenses and depreciation for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012 were $5,695,266 and $5,347,516 respectively, an increase of $347,750 or 7%. Direct costs of hospitality installations decreased approximately $599,000, or 20%, primarily related to the product mix of installations in 2013 versus 2012. Direct costs of recurring services increased approximately $947,000, or 49%, the result of having placed into service approximately 34,000 RGUs during the twelve months ended September 30, 2013.

 

Hospitality

 

The hospitality segment includes hotel and meeting rooms in the following geographic segments: United States, Canada, and Other Foreign. As of September 30, 2013 and 2012, Other Foreign included Mexico and Aruba. The products offered under our hospitality segment include the installation of, and the support and service of, high-speed internet access, interactive TV services, free to guest programming, and on-demand programming, as well as advertising and e-commerce products.

 

United States:   US hospitality revenue for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012 was $6,355,608 and $4,771,142 respectively, an increase of $1,584,466 or 33%. This increase consists of an increase in recurring service revenue of approximately $1,660,000 or 91%, the result of a net increase of approximately 33,000 RGUs to 69,000 RGUs in service at September 30, 2013, and a decrease in product and installation revenue of approximately $75,000 or 3%.

 

Canada:   Canadian hospitality revenue for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012 was $369,187 and $494,204 respectively, a decrease of $125,017 or 25%. In part due to management’s decision not to invest in a declining business segment through funding hotel upgrades of their video on demand systems, nor the hotel’s willingness to finance such upgrades, several Canadian properties have either terminated or decided not to renew their contract with the Company. Also contributing to the decrease in revenue is the hotel guests seeking alternative technologies in viewing content in lieu of purchasing video on demand films.

 

Other Foreign:   Other foreign hospitality revenue for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012 was $175,116 and $103,411 respectively, an increase of $71,705 or 69%. This increase consists of approximately $137,000 of installation revenue and a decrease in recurring service revenue of approximately $34,000, primarily the result of a loss a resort hotel.

 

Residential

 

Our residential segment includes multi-dwelling unit and business customers in the United States. The products offered include the installation of, and the support and service of, telephone, internet, and television services.

 

25

 

Residential revenue for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012 was $659,185 and $691,384 respectively, and decrease of $32,199 or 5%.

 

Operational Expenses

 

Total operating expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012 was $4,008,756 and $6,055,166, a decrease of $2,046,410, or 34%. This decrease is primarily due to a cost reduction and containment program wherein the Company realized a 39% decrease in personnel reducing payroll and related costs approximately $648,000, and a decline of approximately $283,000 of depreciation expense related to the impaired assets pursuant to the recognition of a $1,112,470 impairment charge in 2012.

 

Our operations department expense decreased $497,904 to $1,052,499 in the nine months ended September 30, 2013 compared to the same period in 2012. This decrease is primarily due to a decrease in personnel, reducing payroll and related costs approximately $517,000.

 

Our product development department expense decreased $200,900 to $636,686 in the nine months ended September 30, 2013 compared to same period in 2012. This decrease is primarily due to a decrease in personnel, reducing payroll and related costs approximately $187,000.

 

Our selling, general and administrative expenses increased $47,513 to $2,042,856 in the nine months ended September 30, 2013 compared to the same period in 2012. This increase is primarily attributable to approximate fluctuations as follows: (i) payroll and related costs, including stock based compensation increased $56,000 and (ii) professional fees increased of $123,000. These increases were offset by expense reductions of $68,000 in marketing, $36,000 of bad debt expense and $35,000 in various other general and administrative operating accounts.

 

Depreciation expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012 was $276,715 and $559,364 respectively, a decrease of $282,649 or 51%. This decrease reflects the reduction in depreciation expense attributable to the impairment recorded at September 30, 2012.

 

On September 30, 2012 the Company recognized a $1,112,470 loss on the impairment of assets due to circumstances (see note 4) indicating the carrying value of Cardinal Hospitality, Ltd. (“CHL”) assets would not be recoverable from the estimated future cash flows expected to result from their use and eventual disposition. This loss resulted in the write-down of approximately $920,000 of property and equipment, $146,000 of inventory and $46,000 of property receivables.

 

Our operating loss for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012 was $2,144,926 and $5,342,541 respectively, a decrease of $3,197,615 or 60%. This decrease is primarily attributable to the cost savings achieved through the Company’s 2013 cost reduction and containment program, as described above, and the 2012 recognition of a $1,112,470 impairment charge. For the nine months ended September 31, 2013 and 2012, continuing operational expenses, which consist of operating, product development, and selling, general and administrative costs were, as a percentage of recurring revenue, 80% and 141%, respectively, or a decline of 61% of recurring revenue.

 

Non-Operating

 

For the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, our non-operating income was $145,177 and $406,150 respectively. Non-operating income is primarily interest income earned on lease receivables. The decrease of $260,973 of interest income is the result of (i) there were four less properties under lease as of September 30, 2013 as compared to September 30, 2012 and (ii) under the imputed interest method, the recognition of interest income declines over time.

 

Our non-operating expenses for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012 were $465,947 and $450,455 respectively, an increase of $15,492. Non-operating expenses are primarily interest expense attributable to the Cenfin line of credit.

 

For the nine months ended September 30, 2013, we reported a net loss of $2,465,696, compared to a net loss of $5,386,846 for the nine months ended September 30, 2012, a reduction of net loss of $2,921,150, or 54%. This decrease is primarily attributable to the cost savings achieved through the Company’s 2013 cost reduction and containment program, as described above, and the 2012 recognition of a $1,112,470 impairment charge.

 

26

 

FINANCIAL CONDITION

 

LIQUIDITY & CAPITAL RESOURCES

 

As of September 30, 2013 we had $1,788,309 in cash and cash equivalent, which is sufficient to continue business operations for at least the next twelve months. During the nine months ended September 30, 2013, the Company executed against a phased reduction of 39% of its personnel to mitigate its fixed cost base, substantially contributing to the reduction of operational expenses, which consist of operations, product development and selling, general and administrative costs as a percentage of recurring revenue to 80%, as compared to 141% for the same period in 2012. In addition, the Company has developed an effective vendor management program to reduce its outstanding payables and extend payment terms. Working capital at September 30, 2013 was $294,440.

 

The Company is in receipt of a letter from Technology Integration Group ("TIG") demanding payment of approximately $2,430,000 with respect to inventory and services which the Company purchased from TIG. The amount is recorded (net of payments made in 2013) in accounts payable in the accompanying balance sheets as of September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012. TIG subsequently filed an action in California State Court although the Company has not yet been served in such action. The Company believes that it has meritorious defenses and counterclaims in respect of TIG's claim. The Company intends to pursue a settlement of all claims with TIG and is in discussions with TIG in respect thereof.

 

The Company is in receipt of a District Court Civil Summons, dated August 23, 2013, in the matter of “ScanSource v. Roomlinx, Inc.”, commenced in the District Court of Greenville County, South Carolina (the “Action”). The plaintiffs in the Action claim that the Company owes them approximately $473,000 with respect to inventory which the Company purchased. The amount is recorded in accounts payable in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets as of September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012. The Company intends to pursue a settlement of all claims.

 

As described above the Company is pursuing settlements with these vendors. In the event the parties cannot agree to such terms, the Company believes such civil actions will not be settled prior to September 30, 2014. Accordingly, the Company believes these claims and their settlements will result in the Company’s ability to continue operations for at least the next twelve months. However, in the event there is unfavorable judgment against the Company within the next 12 months the Company may not be able to continue as a going concern.

 

As of September 30, 2013, the Company has $2,659,378 in inventory, net of the reserve for obsolescence. Management is currently focused on turning this inventory through its sales efforts. Proceeds received from the sale of this inventory will enhance our ability to settle the outstanding payables.

 

As discussed in Note 7 to our interim financial statements, the Company’s Credit Agreement with Cenfin LLC (“Cenfin”) was recently amended to provide that the determination as to whether Cenfin will advance funds under the Credit Agreement shall be made solely by Cenfin. Accordingly, there are no guarantees that Cenfin will make any additional advances under the Credit Agreement. If the Company is unable to borrow additional funds under the line of credit or obtain financing from alternative sources, the Company estimates its current cash and cash equivalents are sufficient to fund operations for at least the next twelve months.

 

Operating Activities

 

Net cash used by operating activities increased to $2,093,396 for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 from $1,823,677 for the nine months ended September 30, 2012, an increase of $269,719, attributable to a decrease in net loss of $2,921,150 adjusted by (i) a decrease of $1,258,840 in the change from non-cash expenses and (ii) the change in operating assets and liabilities primarily represent current assets and liabilities, or working capital, which increased the use of cash by $1,932,029. Significant declines in non-cash expenses included depreciation and bad debt expense. The change in operating assets and liabilities is primarily due to the timing of the customer’s acceptance of installations resulting in the expensing of inventory and the corresponding revenue recognition of deposits previously classified as deferred revenue and the payment of vendor invoices.

 

Investing Activities

 

Net cash provided by investing activities was $686,686 for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 compared to $395,071 provided by investing activities during the same period in 2012. The increase in cash provided by investing activities of $291,615 was attributable to a savings of $142,879 resulting from a decrease in financing customer installation, and a savings of $167,249 resulting from a decline in capital expenditures 2013 versus 2012, offset by a decrease in 2013 cash receipts against leases receivable totaling $18,513.

 

Financing Activities

 

Net cash used in financing activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 was $17,262 compared to net cash provided by financing activities of $3,980,787 for the nine months ended September 30, 2012. The decrease in cash of $3,998,049 in financing activities is primarily attributable to 2012 activities that included (i) the sale of common stock which resulted in proceeds of $2,933,311 and (ii) the receipt of an advance against its line of credit in the amount of $1,000,000.

 

27

  

Contractual Obligations

 

We have operating and capital lease commitments, note payable commitments, and a line of credit commitment. The following table summarizes these commitments at September 30, 2013:

 

Twelve months  Line of   Notes   Lease Obligations   Minimum 
ended September 30,  Credit   Payable   Capital   Operating   Payments 
2014  $340,000   $10,766   $12,036   $137,764   $500,566 
2015   1,106,000    12,012    6,434    152,085    1,276,531 
2016   2,130,000    11,065    -    -    2,141,065 
2017   1,600,000    -    -    -    1,600,000 
   $5,176,000   $33,843   $18,470   $289,849   $5,518,162 

 

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

 

We are exposed to risk from potential changes in the U.S./Canadian currency exchange rates as they relate to our services and purchases for our Canadian customers.

 

Foreign exchange gain / (loss)

 

Transactions denominated in a foreign currency give rise to a gain (loss) which is included in selling, general and administrative expenses in the consolidated statement of comprehensive income (loss). For the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, transaction losses were not material.

 

Translation of Financial Results


Because we translate a portion of our financial results from Canadian dollars to U.S. dollars, fluctuations in the value of the Canadian dollar directly effect on our reported consolidated results. We do not hedge against the possible impact of this risk. A ten percent adverse change in the foreign currency exchange rate would not have a significant impact on our consolidated results of operations or financial position.

 

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

 

Management’s Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

 

Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, we conducted an evaluation of our disclosure controls and procedures, as such term is defined under Rule 13a-15(e) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). Based on this evaluation, our principal executive officer and our principal financial officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were inadequate as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report.

 

Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

 

Our Company’s management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act.

 

Management assessed the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over its financial reporting as of September 30, 2013. In undertaking this assessment, management used the criteria established by the Committee of the Sponsoring Organizations (COSO) of the Treadway Commission contained in the Internal Control—Integrated Framework.

 

As of September 30, 2013, based on management’s assessment as described above, the Company had determined that it did not maintain effective controls over financial reporting. Specifically, due to the limited number of individuals within our accounting and finance department and department turn-over, we had a lack of adequate resources, including headcount, to ensure timely identification, resolution and recording of accounting matters. Since these controls have a pervasive effect across the organization, management has determined that these circumstances constitute a material weakness in internal control over financial reporting. As of September 30, 2013, the Company has implemented certain internal control procedures related to the purchase order cycle and review procedures to address timely identification of accounting matters. We will continue to implement further, appropriate processes and measures to remediate this material weakness.

 

28

  

This quarterly report does not include an attestation report of the Company’s registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. Management’s report was not subject to attestation by the Company’s registered public accounting firm pursuant to temporary rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission that permit the Company to provide only management’s report in this annual report.

 

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

 

There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during our fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2013 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

 

29

 

PART II - OTHER INFORMATION

 

30

 

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

 

For information on legal proceedings, refer to Note 11, “Contingent Liabilities” in the notes to the unaudited consolidated financial statements.

 

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

 

None

 

Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities

 

None.

 

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures

 

Not applicable

 

Item 5. Other Information

 

None

 

Item 6. Exhibits

 

10.1 Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, dated as of August 29, 2013, between Roomlinx, Inc. and Michael S. Wasik, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on September 4, 2013.
   
10.2 Employment Agreement, dated as of August 29, 2013, between Roomlinx, Inc. and Jason Andrew Baxter, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on September 4, 2013.
   
*10.3 Employment Agreement, dated as of August 29, 2013, between Roomlinx, Inc. and Robert Wagener.
   
*10.4 Form of Indemnification Agreement between Roomlinx, Inc. and each of Alan Fine, Jason Andrew Baxter and Robert Wagener.
   
*31.1 Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
   
*31.2 Certification of the Interim Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
   
*32.1 Certification pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 for the Chief Executive and Chief Financial Officers.
   
*101 Interactive data files pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T: (i) the Consolidated Balance Sheets as of September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, (ii) the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Loss for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, (iii) the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, (iv) the Consolidated Statements of Changes in Deficit for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, and (vi) the notes to the Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements.
   
* Filed herewith.

 

31

  

Signatures

 

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

 

    Roomlinx, Inc.
     
  By: /s/ Michael S. Wasik
    Michael S. Wasik
    Chief Executive Officer
     
  Date: November 14, 2013

 

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

 

  By: /s/ Michael S. Wasik
    Michael S. Wasik
    Chief Executive Officer
    (Principal Executive Officer)
     
  By: /s/ Alan Fine
    Alan Fine
    Interim Chief Financial Officer
    and Interim Principal Accounting Officer
     
  Date: November 14, 2013

 

32