Explanatory Statement to Form 8-K Amendment
The purpose of this Form 8-K/A is to amend and restate in its entirety the Form 8-K which we filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 24, 2012 (the “Original Filing”) to provide that there have been neither disagreements with our former accountants nor reportable events of the type required to be disclosed through the interim period from the date of our last audited financial statements through April 24, 2012, the date of dismissal. The Original Filing is amended and restated as follows:
Item 4.01 Changes in Registrant’s Certifying Accountant.
On April 24, 2012, Roomlinx, Inc. (the “Company”) dismissed StarkSchenkein LLP (“Stark”) as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm.
The decision to terminate Stark was recommended and approved by the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company.
Stark’s audit report on the financial statements of the Company as of and for the two most recent years ended December 31, 2011 contained no adverse opinion or disclaimer of opinion and was not qualified or modified as to uncertainty, audit scope, or accounting principles.
During the Company’s two most recent fiscal years (ended December 31, 2010 and December 31, 2011) and for the interim period of January 1, 2012 through April 24, 2012, there were no disagreements with Stark on any matter of accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure, or auditing scope or procedure, which disagreement(s) if not resolved to the satisfaction of Stark, would have caused Stark to make reference to the subject matter of the disagreement(s) in connection with its report.
During the Company’s two most recent fiscal years (ended December 31, 2010 and December 31, 2011) and for the interim period of January 1, 2012 through April 24, 2012, there have been no reportable events of the type required to be disclosed by Item 304(a)(1)(v) of Regulation S-K.
The Company has provided Stark with a copy of the disclosures it is making in response to Item 304(a) of Regulation S-K. The Company has requested that Stark review the disclosure and furnish the Company with a letter addressed to the Commission stating whether it agrees with the statements made by the Company in response to Item 304(a) of Regulation S-K and, if not, stating the respects in which it does not agree. Such letter is filed as an exhibit to this Report.