XML 40 R8.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.1.9
SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
12 Months Ended
Aug. 02, 2014
Organization, Consolidation and Presentation of Financial Statements [Abstract]  
SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
(a)
Nature of Business
United Natural Foods, Inc. and subsidiaries (the "Company") is a leading distributor and retailer of natural, organic and specialty products. The Company sells its products primarily throughout the United States and Canada.
(b)
Basis of Presentation
The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries. All significant intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation. Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current year's presentation.
The fiscal year of the Company ends on the Saturday closest to July 31. Fiscal 2014, 2013 and 2012 ended on August 2, 2014, August 3, 2013 and July 28, 2012, respectively. Fiscal 2014 and 2012 contained 52 weeks and fiscal 2013 contained 53 weeks. Each of the Company's interim quarters consisted of 13 weeks except for the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2013 which contained 14 weeks.
Net sales consists primarily of sales of natural, organic and specialty products to retailers, adjusted for customer volume discounts, returns and allowances. Net sales also includes amounts charged by the Company to customers for shipping and handling, and fuel surcharges. The principal components of cost of sales include the amount paid to manufacturers and growers for product sold, plus the cost of transportation necessary to bring the product to the Company's distribution centers, offset by consideration received from suppliers in connection with the purchase of the suppliers' products. Cost of sales also includes amounts incurred by the Company's manufacturing subsidiary, Woodstock Farms Manufacturing, for inbound transportation costs and depreciation for manufacturing equipment, offset by consideration received from suppliers in connection with the purchase or promotion of the suppliers' products. Operating expenses include salaries and wages, employee benefits (including payments under the Company's Employee Stock Ownership Plan), warehousing and delivery, selling, occupancy, insurance, administrative, share-based compensation and amortization expense. Operating expenses also include depreciation expense related to the wholesale and retail divisions. Other expense (income) includes interest on outstanding indebtedness, interest income and miscellaneous income and expenses. The consolidated statements of cash flows for the fiscal year ended August 3, 2013 and July 28, 2012 have been adjusted to properly present a change in the presentation of operating activities. The revisions were not material to the Company's consolidated financial statements as a whole.
(c)
Cash Equivalents
Cash equivalents consist of highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less.
(d)
Inventories and Cost of Sales
Inventories consist primarily of finished goods and are stated at the lower of cost or market, with cost being determined using the first-in, first-out (FIFO) method. Allowances received from suppliers are recorded as reductions in cost of sales upon the sale of the related products.
(e)
Property and Equipment
Property and equipment are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation and amortization. Equipment under capital leases is stated at the lower of the present value of minimum lease payments at the inception of the lease or the fair value of the asset. As of August 2, 2014 and August 3, 2013, property and equipment includes the Company's non-cash capital expenditures made by the landlord for our Aurora, Colorado distribution center and related accumulated depreciation. Refer to Note 7, Long-Term Debt, for additional information regarding this transaction. Depreciation and amortization of property and equipment is computed on a straight-line basis, over the estimated useful lives of the assets or, when applicable, the life of the lease, whichever is shorter.
Applicable interest charges incurred during the construction of new facilities may be capitalized as one of the elements of cost and amortized over the assets' estimated useful lives. The Company capitalized $0.9 million of interest during the fiscal year ended August 2, 2014 related to the construction of new distribution centers in Sturtevant, Wisconsin and Montgomery, New York. There was no interest capitalized during the fiscal years ended August 3, 2013 or July 28, 2012.
Property and equipment consisted of the following at August 2, 2014 and August 3, 2013:

 
Original
Estimated
Useful Lives
(Years)
 
2014
 
2013
 
(In thousands, except years)
Land
 
 
$
31,324

 
$
12,950

Buildings and improvements
20-40
 
215,172

 
192,837

Leasehold improvements
5-20
 
130,739

 
97,749

Warehouse equipment
3-30
 
128,121

 
117,999

Office equipment
3-10
 
71,524

 
74,003

Computer software
3-7
 
97,196

 
63,333

Motor vehicles
3-7
 
4,520

 
4,461

Construction in progress
 
 
79,002

 
23,298

 
 
 
757,598

 
586,630

Less accumulated depreciation and amortization
 
 
273,638

 
248,036

Net property and equipment
 
 
$
483,960

 
$
338,594


Depreciation expense amounted to $42.9 million, $37.6 million and $35.2 million for the fiscal years ended August 2, 2014, August 3, 2013 and July 28, 2012, respectively.
(f)
Income Taxes
The Company accounts for income taxes under the asset and liability method. Under the asset and liability method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date.
(g)
Long-Lived Assets
Management reviews long-lived assets, including definite-lived intangible assets, for indicators of impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of the assets may not be recoverable. Cash flows expected to be generated by the related assets are estimated over the assets' useful lives based on updated projections. If the evaluation indicates that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable, the potential impairment is measured based on a projected discounted cash flow model.
(h)
Goodwill and Intangible Assets
Goodwill represents the excess of cost over the fair value of net assets acquired in a business combination. Goodwill and other intangible assets with indefinite lives are not amortized. Intangible assets with definite lives are amortized on a straight-line basis over the following lives:
Customer relationships
 
7-20 years
Non-competition agreements
 
1-10 years
Trademarks and tradenames
 
4-10 years

Goodwill is assigned to the reporting units that are expected to benefit from the synergies of the business combination. The Company is required to test goodwill for impairment at least annually, and between annual tests if events occur or circumstances change that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of a reporting unit below its carrying amount. The Company has elected to perform its annual tests for indications of goodwill impairment during the fourth quarter of each fiscal year.
The Company's reporting units are at or one level below the operating segment level. Approximately 93.5% of the Company's goodwill is within its wholesale reporting unit. In accordance with Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") No. 2011-08, Intangibles- Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Testing Goodwill for Impairment ("ASU 2011-08"), the Company is allowed to perform a qualitative assessment for goodwill impairment unless it believes it is more likely than not that a reporting unit's fair value is less than the carrying value. The thresholds used by the Company for this determination in fiscal 2014 were for any reporting units that (1) have passed their previous two-step test with a margin of calculated fair value versus carrying value of at least 20%, (2) have had no significant changes to their working capital structure, and (3) have current year income which is at least 85% of prior year amounts. Based on the qualitative assessment performed for fiscal 2014, all of the Company's four reporting units met these thresholds. As each reporting unit has passed its previous two-step test, no reporting unit's net income has decreased more than 15% and their working capital requirements have not increased significantly, no quantitative testing was performed in fiscal 2014.
If a reporting unit did not meet the thresholds above, the Company would have performed a two-step goodwill impairment analysis. The first step to identify potential impairment involves comparing each reporting unit's estimated fair value to its carrying value, including goodwill. Each reporting unit regularly prepares discrete operating forecasts and uses these forecasts as the basis for the assumptions used in the discounted cash flow analysis. If the estimated fair value of a reporting unit exceeds its carrying value, goodwill is considered not to be impaired. If the carrying value exceeds estimated fair value, there is an indication of potential impairment and the second step is performed to measure the amount of impairment. If required, the second step involves calculating an implied fair value of goodwill for each reporting unit for which the first step indicated potential impairment. The implied fair value of goodwill is determined in a manner similar to the amount of goodwill calculated in a business combination, by measuring the excess of the estimated fair value of the reporting unit, as determined in the first step, over the aggregate estimated fair values of the individual assets, liabilities and identifiable intangible assets. If the implied fair value of goodwill exceeds the carrying value of goodwill assigned to the reporting unit, there is no impairment. If the carrying value of goodwill assigned to a reporting unit exceeds the implied fair value of the goodwill, an impairment charge is recorded for the excess.
Intangible assets with indefinite lives are tested for impairment at least annually during the fourth fiscal quarter and if events occur or circumstances change that would indicate that the value of the asset may be impaired. Impairment is measured as the difference between the fair value of the asset and its carrying value. In the first quarter of fiscal 2013, the Company entered into an agreement to terminate its licensing agreement with the former owners of an acquired business.  In connection with this termination agreement, during the three months ended October 27, 2012, the Company recognized an impairment of $1.6 million representing the remaining unamortized balance of the intangible asset. In accordance with ASU No. 2012-02, Intangibles- Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Testing Indefinite Lived Intangible Assets for Impairment ("ASU 2012-02"), the Company is allowed to perform a qualitative assessment for intangible asset impairment unless it believes it is more likely than not that an intangible asset's fair value is less than the carrying value. The thresholds used by the Company for this determination in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2014 were for any intangible assets (or groups of assets) that (1) have passed their previous two-step test with a margin of calculated fair value versus carrying value of at least 20% and (2) have current year income which is at least 85% of prior year amounts. The Company's only indefinite lived intangible assets are the branded product line asset group. During fiscal 2014, the Company's annual qualitative assessment of its indefinite lived intangible assets indicated that no impairment existed.
The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill and the amount allocated by reportable segment for the years presented are as follows (in thousands):
 
Wholesale
 
Other
 
Total
Goodwill as of July 28, 2012
$
176,210

 
$
17,531

 
$
193,741

Goodwill adjustment for prior year business combinations
8,979

 

 
8,979

Contingent consideration for prior year business combinations

 
200

 
200

Change in foreign exchange rates
(1,046
)
 

 
(1,046
)
Goodwill as of August 3, 2013
$
184,143

 
$
17,731

 
$
201,874

Goodwill from current year business combinations
73,966

 

 
73,966

Contingent consideration for prior year business combinations
62

 

 
62

Change in foreign exchange rates
(1,354
)
 

 
(1,354
)
Goodwill as of August 2, 2014
$
256,817

 
$
17,731

 
$
274,548


The following table presents the detail of the Company's other intangible assets (in thousands):
 
August 2, 2014
 
August 3, 2013
 
Gross Carrying
Amount
 
Accumulated
Amortization
 
Net
 
Gross Carrying
Amount
 
Accumulated
Amortization
 
Net
Amortizing intangible assets:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Customer relationships
$
98,928

 
$
18,901

 
$
80,027

 
$
34,704

 
$
14,136

 
$
20,568

Non-compete agreements
800

 
13

 
787

 

 

 

Trademarks and tradenames
678

 
88

 
590

 
771

 
78

 
693

Total amortizing intangible assets
100,406

 
19,002

 
81,404

 
35,475

 
14,214

 
21,261

Indefinite lived intangible assets:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Trademarks and tradenames
53,585

 

 
53,585

 
28,279

 

 
28,279

Total
$
153,991

 
$
19,002

 
$
134,989

 
$
63,754

 
$
14,214

 
$
49,540


Amortization expense was $5.1 million, $4.1 million and $3.3 million for the fiscal years ended August 2, 2014, August 3, 2013 and July 28, 2012, respectively. The estimated future amortization expense for each of the next five fiscal years and thereafter on definite lived intangible assets existing as of August 2, 2014 is shown below:
Fiscal Year:
(In thousands)
2015
$
7,880

2016
6,755

2017
6,525

2018
5,836

2019
5,821

2020 and thereafter
48,587

 
$
81,404



(i)
Revenue Recognition and Concentration of Credit Risk
The Company records revenue upon delivery of products. Revenues are recorded net of applicable sales discounts and estimated sales returns. Sales incentives provided to customers are accounted for as reductions in revenue as the related revenue is recorded. The Company's sales are primarily to customers located throughout the United States and Canada.
Whole Foods Market, Inc. was the Company's largest customer in each fiscal year presented. Whole Foods Market, Inc. accounted for approximately 36% of the Company's net sales for the years ended August 2, 2014, August 3, 2013 and July 28, 2012. There were no other customers that individually generated 10% or more of the Company's net sales.
The Company analyzes customer creditworthiness, accounts receivable balances, payment history, payment terms and historical bad debt levels when evaluating the adequacy of its allowance for doubtful accounts. In instances where a reserve has been recorded for a particular customer, future sales to the customer are conducted using either cash-on-delivery terms, or the account is closely monitored so that as agreed upon payments are received, orders are released; a failure to pay results in held or cancelled orders.
(j)
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The carrying amounts of the Company's financial instruments including cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable and certain accrued expenses approximate fair value due to the short-term nature of these instruments.
The following estimated fair value amounts have been determined by the Company using available market information and appropriate valuation methodologies. Refer to Note 8, Fair Value Measurements, for additional information regarding the fair value hierarchy. The fair value of notes payable and long-term debt are based on the instruments' interest rate, terms, maturity date and collateral, if any, in comparison to the Company's incremental borrowing rate for similar financial instruments. However, considerable judgment is required in interpreting market data to develop the estimates of fair value. Accordingly, the estimates presented herein are not necessarily indicative of the amounts that the Company could realize in a current market exchange.

 
August 2, 2014
 
August 3, 2013
 
Carrying Value
 
Fair Value
 
Carrying Value
 
Fair Value
 
(In thousands)
Assets:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Cash and cash equivalents
$
16,116

 
$
16,116

 
$
11,111

 
$
11,111

Accounts receivable
449,870

 
449,870

 
339,590

 
339,590

Notes receivable
5,936

 
5,936

 
3,315

 
3,315

Liabilities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Accounts payable
385,890

 
385,890

 
283,851

 
283,851

Notes payable
415,660

 
415,660

 
130,594

 
130,594

Long-term debt, including current portion
33,500

 
36,386

 
34,110

 
36,230



(k)
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect amounts reported therein. Due to the inherent uncertainty involved in making estimates, actual results reported in future periods may be based on amounts that differ from those estimates.
(l)
Notes Receivable, Trade
The Company issues trade notes receivable to certain customers under two basic circumstances; inventory purchases for initial store openings and overdue accounts receivable. Notes issued in connection with store openings are generally receivable over a period not to exceed thirty-six months. Notes issued in connection with overdue accounts receivable may extend for periods greater than one year. All notes are issued at a market interest rate and contain certain guarantees and collateral assignments in favor of the Company.
(m)
Share-Based Compensation
The Company accounts for its share-based compensation in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") Accounting Standards Codification ("ASC") 718, Stock Compensation ("ASC 718"). ASC 718 requires the recognition of the fair value of share-based compensation in net income. The Company has four share-based employee compensation plans, which are described more fully in Note 3. Share-based compensation consists of stock options, restricted stock awards, restricted stock units, performance shares and performance units. Stock options are granted to employees and directors at exercise prices equal to the fair market value of the Company's stock at the dates of grant. Generally, stock options, restricted stock awards and restricted stock units granted to employees vest ratably over 4 years from the grant date and grants to members of the Company's Board of Directors vest ratably over 2 years with one third vesting immediately. Beginning in fiscal 2008, the Company's President and Chief Executive Officer has been granted performance shares and performance units which have vested in accordance with the terms of the related Performance Share and Performance Unit agreements. During fiscal 2014 and fiscal 2013, the Company granted performance-based stock units to its executive officers that will vest if the Company achieves certain performance metrics as of and for the years ended August 1, 2015 and August 2, 2014, respectively. The Company recognizes share-based compensation expense on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period of the individual grants, which generally equals the vesting period.
ASC 718 also requires that compensation expense be recognized for only the portion of share-based awards that are expected to vest. Therefore, we apply estimated forfeiture rates that are derived from historical employee and director termination activity to reduce the amount of compensation expense recognized. If the actual forfeitures differ from the estimate, additional adjustments to compensation expense may be required in future periods.
The Company receives an income tax deduction for restricted stock awards and restricted stock units when they vest and for non-qualified stock options exercised by employees equal to the excess of the fair market value of its common stock on the vesting or exercise date over the exercised price. Excess tax benefits (tax benefits resulting from tax deductions in excess of compensation cost recognized) are presented as a cash inflow provided by financing activities in the accompanying consolidated statement of cash flows.
(n)
Earnings Per Share
Basic earnings per share is calculated by dividing net income by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per share is calculated by adding the dilutive potential common shares to the weighted average number of common shares that were outstanding during the period. For purposes of the diluted earnings per share calculation, outstanding stock options, restricted stock awards, restricted stock units and performance-based awards, if applicable, are considered common stock equivalents, using the treasury stock method. A reconciliation of the weighted average number of shares outstanding used in the computation of the basic and diluted earnings per share for all periods presented follows:
 
Fiscal year ended
 
August 2,
2014
 
August 3,
2013
 
July 28,
2012
 
(In thousands)
Basic weighted average shares outstanding
49,602

 
49,217

 
48,766

Net effect of dilutive common stock equivalents based upon the treasury stock method
286

 
292

 
334

Diluted weighted average shares outstanding
49,888

 
49,509

 
49,100

Potential anti-dilutive share-based payment awards excluded from the computation above
6

 
121

 
88



(o)
Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Comprehensive income (loss) is reported in accordance with ASU No. 2013-02, and includes net income and the change in other comprehensive income (loss). Other comprehensive income (loss) is comprised of the net change in fair value of derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges, as well as foreign currency translation related to the translation of UNFI Canada, Inc. ("UNFI Canada") from the functional currency of Canadian dollars to U.S. dollar reporting currency. For all periods presented, the Company displays comprehensive income (loss) and its components in the consolidated statements of comprehensive income.
(p)
Derivative Financial Instruments
The Company is exposed to market risks arising from changes in interest rates, fuel costs, and with the operation of UNFI Canada, foreign currency exchange rates. The Company uses derivatives principally in the management of interest rate and fuel price exposure. From time to time the Company may use foreign contracts to hedge transactions in foreign currency. The Company does not utilize derivatives that contain leverage features. For derivative transactions accounted for as hedges, on the date the Company enters into the derivative transaction, the exposure is identified. The Company formally documents all relationships between hedging instruments and hedged items, as well as its risk-management objective and strategy for undertaking the hedge transaction. In this documentation, the Company specifically identifies the asset, liability, firm commitment, forecasted transaction, or net investment that has been designated as the hedged item and states how the hedging instrument is expected to reduce the risks related to the hedged item. The Company measures effectiveness of its hedging relationships both at hedge inception and on an ongoing basis as needed. As of August 2, 2014, the Company was not a party to any material derivative financial instruments.
(q)
Shipping and Handling Fees and Costs
The Company includes shipping and handling fees billed to customers in net sales. Shipping and handling costs associated with inbound freight are generally recorded in cost of sales, whereas shipping and handling costs for selecting, quality assurance, and outbound transportation are recorded in operating expenses. Outbound shipping and handling costs, totaled $397.7 million, $358.8 million and $295.5 million for the fiscal years ended August 2, 2014, August 3, 2013 and July 28, 2012, respectively. The Company began allocating employee benefit expenses to shipping and handling fees and costs in fiscal 2013. Outbound shipping and handling costs for fiscal 2012 exclude employee benefit expenses.
(r)
Reserves for Self-Insurance
The Company is primarily self-insured for workers' compensation, and general and automobile liability insurance. It is the Company's policy to record the self-insured portion of workers' compensation and automobile liabilities based upon actuarial methods to estimate the future cost of claims and related expenses that have been reported but not settled, and that have been incurred but not yet reported. Any projection of losses concerning workers' compensation and automobile liability is subject to a considerable degree of variability. Among the causes of this variability are unpredictable external factors affecting litigation trends, benefit level changes and claim settlement patterns.
(s)
Operating Lease Expenses
The Company records lease expense via the straight-line method. For leases with step rent provisions whereby the rental payments increase over the life of the lease, and for leases where the Company receives rent-free periods, the Company recognizes expense based on a straight-line basis based on the total minimum lease payments to be made over the expected lease term.
(t)
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements    
In May 2014, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, (Topic 606) ("ASU 2014-09"). The core principle of the new guidance is that an entity will recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. The new pronouncement is effective for public companies with annual periods, and interim periods within those periods, beginning after December 15, 2016, which will be the first quarter of the fiscal year ended July 28, 2018. We are in the process of evaluating the impact that this new guidance will have on the Company's consolidated financial statements.
In April 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-08, Presentation of Financial Statements (Topic 2015) and Property Plant, and Equipment (Topic 360): Reporting Discontinued Operations and Disclosures of Disposals of Components of an entity. The new guidance raises the threshold for disposals that would qualify as discontinued operations and also requires additional disclosures regarding discontinued operations, as well as material disposals that do not meet the definition of discontinued operations. The amendments are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning on or after December 15, 2014, which would be the Company's first quarter of the fiscal year ended July 30, 2016, and should be applied on prospective basis. We do not expect the adoption of these provisions to have a significant impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
In February 2013, the FASB issued ASU No. 2013-02, Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Reporting of Amounts Reclassified Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income. This update supersedes the presentation requirements for reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income in ASU No. 2011-05, Presentation of Comprehensive Income, and ASU No. 2011-12, Deferral of the Effective Date for Amendments to the Presentation of Reclassification of Items Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income in Accounting Standards Update No. 2011-05. ASU 2013-02 requires an entity to provide information about amounts reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income by component and to present, either on the face of the financial statements or in a single note, any significant amount reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income in its entirety in the period, and the income statement line item affected by the reclassification. For other amounts that are not required under U.S. GAAP to be reclassified in their entirety to net income, an entity is required to cross-reference to other disclosures required under U.S. GAAP that provide additional detail about those amounts. ASU 2013-02 is effective for annual reporting periods that begin after December 15, 2012 and was adopted by the Company in the first quarter of the fiscal year ending August 2, 2014. The adoption of ASU 2013-02 did not have an impact on the presentation of the Company's consolidated financial statements.