Fair Value Measurements

3 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2020

Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract]

Fair Value Measurements

FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

Universal measures certain financial and nonfinancial assets and liabilities at fair value based on applicable accounting guidance. The financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value include money market funds, trading securities associated with deferred compensation plans, interest rate swap agreements, forward foreign currency exchange contracts, and guarantees of bank loans to tobacco growers. The application of the fair value guidance to nonfinancial assets and liabilities primarily includes the determination of fair values for goodwill and long-lived assets when indicators of potential impairment are present.

Under the accounting guidance, fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The framework for measuring fair value is based on a fair value hierarchy that distinguishes between observable inputs and unobservable inputs. Observable inputs are based on market data obtained from independent sources. Unobservable inputs require the Company to make its own assumptions about the value placed on an asset or liability by market participants because little or no market data exists.

There are three levels within the fair value hierarchy:

Level	Description
1	quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the Company has the ability to access as of the reporting date;
2	quoted prices in active markets for similar assets or liabilities, or quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active, or inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability; and
3	unobservable inputs for the asset or liability.

As permitted under the accounting guidance, the Company uses net asset value per share ("NAV") as a practical expedient to measure the fair value of its money market funds. The fair values for those funds are presented under the heading "NAV" in the tables that follow in this disclosure. In measuring the fair value of liabilities, the Company considers the risk of non-performance in determining fair value. Universal has not elected to report at fair value any financial instruments or any other assets or liabilities that are not required to be reported at fair value under current accounting guidance.

Recurring Fair Value Measurements

At June 30, 2020 and 2019, and at March 31, 2020, the Company had certain financial assets and financial liabilities that were required to be measured and reported at fair value on a recurring basis. These assets and liabilities are listed in the tables below and are classified based on how their values were determined under the fair value hierarchy or the NAV practical expedient:

	June 30, 2020
			Fair Value Hierarchy
(in thousands of dollars)	NAV		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total
Assets
Money market funds	$	4,013	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	4,013
Trading securities associated with deferred compensation plans	—		13,963		—		—		13,963
Foreign currency exchange contracts	—		—		720		—		720
Total financial assets measured and reported at fair value	$	4,013	$	13,963	$	720	$	—	$	18,696
Liabilities
Guarantees of bank loans to tobacco growers	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	100	$	100
Acquisition-related contingent consideration obligations - short term	—		—		—		—		—
Acquisition-related contingent consideration obligations - long term	—		—		—		2,532		2,532
Interest rate swap agreements	—		—		39,022		—		39,022
Foreign currency exchange contracts	—		—		2,092		—		2,092
Total financial liabilities measured and reported at fair value	$	—	$	—	$	41,114	$	2,632	$	43,746

	June 30, 2019
			Fair Value Hierarchy
(in thousands of dollars)	NAV		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total
Assets
Money market funds	$	77,229	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	77,229
Trading securities associated with deferred compensation plans	—		16,356		—		—		16,356
Foreign currency exchange contracts	—		—		2,864		—		2,864
Total financial assets measured and reported at fair value	$	77,229	$	16,356	$	2,864	$	—	$	96,449
Liabilities
Guarantees of bank loans to tobacco growers	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	785	$	785
Interest rate swap agreements	—		—		16,158		—		16,158
Foreign currency exchange contracts	—		—		65		—		65
Total financial liabilities measured and reported at fair value	$	—	$	—	$	16,223	$	785	$	17,008

	March 31, 2020
			Fair Value Hierarchy
(in thousands of dollars)	NAV		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total
Assets
Money market funds	$	4,011	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	4,011
Trading securities associated with deferred compensation plans	—		12,635		—		—		12,635
Foreign currency exchange contracts	—		—		314		—		314
Total financial assets measured and reported at fair value	$	4,011	$	12,635	$	314	$	—	$	16,960
Liabilities
Guarantees of bank loans to tobacco growers	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	103	$	103
Acquisition-related contingent consideration obligations - short-term	—		—		—		4,173		4,173
Acquisition-related contingent consideration obligations - long-term	—		—		—		2,532		2,532
Interest rate swap agreements	—		—		37,163		—		37,163
Foreign currency exchange contracts	—		—		15,842		—		15,842
Total financial liabilities measured and reported at fair value	$	—	$	—	$	53,005	$	6,808	$	59,813

Money market funds

The fair value of money market funds, which are reported in cash and cash equivalents in the consolidated balance sheets, is based on NAV, which is the amount at which the funds are redeemable and is used as a practical expedient for fair value. These funds are not classified in the fair value hierarchy, but are disclosed as part of the fair value table above.

Trading securities associated with deferred compensation plans

Trading securities represent mutual fund investments that are matched to employee deferred compensation obligations. These investments are bought and sold as employees defer compensation, receive distributions, or make changes in the funds underlying their accounts. Quoted market prices (Level 1) are used to determine the fair values of the mutual funds.

Interest rate swap agreements

The fair values of interest rate swap agreements are determined based on dealer quotes using a discounted cash flow model matched to the contractual terms of each instrument. Since inputs to the model are observable and significant judgment is not required in determining the fair values, interest rate swaps are classified within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.

Foreign currency exchange contracts

The fair values of forward and option foreign currency exchange contracts are also determined based on dealer quotes using a discounted cash flow model matched to the contractual terms of each instrument. Since inputs to the model are observable and significant judgment is not required in determining the fair values, forward and option foreign currency exchange contracts are classified within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.

Acquisition-related contingent consideration obligations

The Company estimates the fair value of acquisition-related contingent consideration obligations by applying an income approach model that utilizes probability-weighted discounted cash flows. The Company acquired FruitSmart, Inc. in fiscal year 2020 and recognized a contingent consideration liability of $6.7 million on the date of acquisition. Each period the Company evaluates the fair value of the acquisition-related contingent consideration obligations. For the three months ended June 30, 2020, the evaluation resulted in the reduction of $4.2 million of contingent consideration of the original $6.7 million liability recorded. Significant judgment is applied to this model and therefore the acquisition-related contingent consideration obligation is classified within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy.

A reconciliation of the change in the balance of the acquisition-related contingent consideration obligation (Level 3) for the three months ended June 30, 2020 and 2019 is provided below.

	Three Months Ended June 30,
	2020			2019
Balance beginning of year	$	6,705		$	—
Change in fair value of contingent consideration liability	(4,173		)	—
Balance at end of period	$	2,532		$	—

Guarantees of bank loans to tobacco growers

The Company guarantees bank loans to tobacco growers in Brazil for crop financing. In the event that the farmers default on their payments to the banks, the Company would be required to perform under the guarantees. The Company regularly evaluates the likelihood of farmer defaults based on an expected loss analysis and records the fair value of its guarantees as an obligation in its consolidated financial statements. The fair value of the guarantees is determined using the expected loss data for all loans outstanding at each measurement date. The present value of the cash flows associated with the estimated losses is then calculated at a risk-adjusted interest rate that is aligned with the expected duration of the liability and includes an adjustment for nonperformance risk. This approach is sometimes referred to as the “contingent claims valuation method.” Although historical loss data is an observable input, significant judgment is required in applying this information to the portfolio of guaranteed loans outstanding at each measurement date and in selecting a risk-adjusted interest rate. Significant increases or decreases in the risk-adjusted interest rate may result in a significantly higher or lower fair value measurement. The guarantees of bank loans to tobacco growers are therefore classified within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy.

A reconciliation of the change in the balance of the financial liability for guarantees of bank loans to tobacco growers (Level 3) for the three months ended June 30, 2020 and 2019 is provided below.

	Three Months Ended June 30,
	2020			2019
Balance at beginning of year	$	103		$	803
Payments under the guarantees and transfers to allowance for loss on direct loans to farmers (removal of prior crop year loans from the portfolio)	3			58
Provision for loss or transfers from allowance for loss on direct loans to farmers (addition of current crop year loans)	—			(79		)
Change in discount rate and estimated collection period	(2		)	(5		)
Currency remeasurement	(5		)	8
Balance at end of year	$	99		$	785

Long-term Debt

The fair value of the Company’s long-term debt, including the current portion, was approximately $370 million at each of the balance sheet dates June 30, 2020, June 30, 2019, and March 31, 2020. The Company estimates the fair value of its long-term debt using Level 2 inputs which are based upon quoted market prices for the same or similar obligations or on calculations that are based on the current interest rates available to the Company for debt of similar terms and maturities.

Nonrecurring Fair Value Measurements

Assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis primarily relate to long-lived assets, right-of-use operating lease assets and liabilities, goodwill and intangibles, and other noncurrent assets. These assets and liabilities fair values are evaluated for impairment when potential indicators of impairment exist. Accordingly, the nonrecurring measurement of the fair value of theses assets and liabilities are classified within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy.

Long-Lived Assets

The Company reviews long-lived assets for impairment whenever events, changes in business conditions, or other circumstances provide an indication that such assets may be impaired. Due to business changes that affected the leaf tobacco market in Tanzania and the Company's operations there, an impairment charge of the long-lived assets in Tanzania was recorded in fiscal year 2019 to reduce their carrying value to fair value at March 31, 2019. The long-lived assets consist principally of the Company's processing facility and equipment, storage facilities, tobacco buying and receiving stations, employee housing, and vehicles and transportation equipment. The aggregate fair value and carrying value of those assets following the impairment adjustments was approximately $17 million. The fair values of the property, plant and equipment were determined based principally on a probability-weighting of the discounted cash flows expected under multiple operating and disposition scenarios. Significant judgment was required in estimating the amount and timing of the future cash flows associated with the use and disposition of the assets, as well as the probabilities associated with the respective operating and disposition scenarios.