EX-31.1

Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a) OR RULE 15d-14(a)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Dean L. Cash, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of ATEL Capital Equipment Fund VII, L.P.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: August 12, 2011
/s/ Dean L. Cash Dean L. Cash President and Chief Executive Officer of ATEL Financial Services, LLC (General Partner)

EX-31.2

Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a) OR RULE 15d-14(a)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Paritosh K. Choksi, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of ATEL Capital Equipment Fund VII, L.P.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: August 12, 2011
/s/ Paritosh K. Choksi Paritosh K. Choksi Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer and Chief Operating Officer of ATEL Financial Services, LLC (General Partner)

EX-32.1

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. §1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
§906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of ATEL Capital Equipment Fund VII, L.P. (the “Partnership”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Dean L. Cash, President and Chief Executive Officer of ATEL Financial Services, LLC, General Partner of the Partnership, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.

Date: August 12, 2011
/s/ Dean L. Cash Dean L. Cash President and Chief Executive Officer of ATEL Financial Services, LLC (General Partner)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Partnership and will be retained by the Partnership and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

EX-32.2

Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. §1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
§906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of ATEL Capital Equipment Fund VII, L.P. (the “Partnership”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Paritosh K. Choksi, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer and Chief Operating Officer of ATEL Financial Services, LLC, General Partner of the Partnership, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.

Date: August 12, 2011
/s/ Paritosh K. Choksi Paritosh K. Choksi Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer and Chief Operating Officer of ATEL Financial Services, LLC (General Partner)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Partnership and will be retained by the Partnership and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

XML



BALANCE SHEETS (Parenthetical) (USD $) In Thousands	Jun. 30, 2011	Dec. 31, 2010
Accounts receivable, allowance for doubtful accounts	$ 54	$ 11
Investments in equipment and leases, accumulated depreciation	$ 40,472	$ 41,618

XML



STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (USD $) In Thousands, except Share data, unless otherwise specified	3 Months Ended		6 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2011	Jun. 30, 2010	Jun. 30, 2011	Jun. 30, 2010
Leasing activities:
Operating leases	$ 1,196	$ 674	$ 1,951	$ 1,299
Direct financing leases	70	83	145	171
Gain on sales of assets	51	57	79	123
Other	1		11	6
Total revenues	1,318	814	2,186	1,599
Expenses:
Depreciation of operating lease assets	223	411	609	823
Marine vessel maintenance and other operating costs	153	48	159	103
Cost reimbursements to General Partner			750	750
Equipment and incentive management fees to General Partner	32	16	62	37
Railcar and equipment maintenance	137	110	280	218
Professional fees	7	44	64	139
Insurance	(23)	24	(18)	71
Outside services	14	20	25	36
Other management fees	37	77	51	151
Equipment storage	16	50	53	76
Franchise fees and state taxes	23		42	(10)
Freight and shipping	10	1	244	3
Provision (reversal of provision) for doubtful accounts	43	(1)	43	11
Property taxes	27	3	56	42
Other	42	42	76	74
Total operating expenses	741	845	2,496	2,524
Income (loss) from operations	577	(31)	(310)	(925)
Other loss, net		(2)	(7)	(10)
Net income (loss)	577	(33)	(317)	(935)
Net income (loss):
General Partner				182
Limited Partners	577	(33)	(317)	(1,117)
Net income (loss)	$ 577	$ (33)	$ (317)	$ (935)
Net income (loss) per Limited Partnership Unit	0.04	0.00	(0.02)	(0.07)
Weighted average number of Units outstanding	14,985,550	14,985,550	14,985,550	14,985,550

XML



Document and Entity Information	6 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2011	Jul. 31, 2011
Document Information [Line Items]
Document Type	10-Q
Amendment Flag	false
Document Period End Date	Jun. 30, 2011
Document Fiscal Year Focus	2011
Document Fiscal Period Focus	Q2
Trading Symbol	ZZHJA
Entity Registrant Name	ATEL CAPITAL EQUIPMENT FUND VII LP
Entity Central Index Key	0001019542
Current Fiscal Year End Date	--12-31
Entity Filer Category	Smaller Reporting Company
Entity Units Outstanding		14,985,550

XML



Related party transactions

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2011

Related party transactions

5. Related party transactions:

The terms of the Partnership Agreement provide that AFS and/or affiliates are entitled to receive certain fees for equipment management and resale and for management of the Partnership.

The Partnership Agreement allows for the reimbursement of costs incurred by AFS in providing administrative services to the Partnership. Administrative services provided include Partnership accounting, investor relations, legal counsel and lease and equipment documentation. AFS is not reimbursed for services whereby it is entitled to receive a separate fee as compensation for such services, such as disposition of equipment. The Partnership would be liable for certain future costs to be incurred by AFS to manage the administrative services provided to the Partnership.

Each of ATEL Leasing Corporation (“ALC”) and AFS is a wholly-owned subsidiary of ATEL Capital Group and performs services for the Partnership. Acquisition services, equipment management, lease administration and asset disposition services are performed by ALC; investor relations, communications services and general administrative services are performed by AFS.

Cost reimbursements to the General Partner are based on its costs incurred in performing administrative services for the Partnership. These costs are allocated to each managed entity based on certain criteria such as managed assets, number of investors or contributed capital based upon the type of cost incurred, subject to limitations as described below.

Incentive management fees are computed as 4.0% of distributions of cash from operations, as defined in the Partnership Agreement and equipment management fees are computed as 3.5% of gross revenues from operating leases, as defined in the Partnership Agreement plus 2.0% of gross revenues from full payout leases, as defined in the Partnership Agreement.

During the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, AFS and/or affiliates earned fees and commissions, and billed for reimbursements, pursuant to the Partnership Agreement as follows (in thousands):

	Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
	2011		2010		2011		2010
Equipment and incentive management fees to General Partner	$	32	$	16	$	62	$	37
Cost reimbursements to General Partner and/or affiliates		—		—		750		750
	$	32	$	16	$	812	$	787

The Fund’s Limited Partnership Agreement places an annual and cumulative limit for cost reimbursements to AFS and/or its affiliates. Any reimbursable costs incurred by AFS and/or affiliates during the year exceeding the annual and/or cumulative limits cannot be reimbursed in the current year, though such costs may be reimbursable in future years to the extent such amounts may be payable if within the annual and cumulative limits in such future years. The Fund is a finite life and self liquidating entity, and AFS and its affiliates have no recourse against the Fund for the amount of any unpaid excess reimbursable administrative expenses. The Fund will continue to require administrative services from AFS and its affiliates through the end of its term, and will therefore continue to incur reimbursable administrative expenses in each year. The Fund has determined that payment of any amounts in excess of the annual and cumulative limits is not probable, and the date any portion of such amount may be paid, if ever, is uncertain. When the Fund completes its liquidation stage and terminates, any unpaid amount will expire unpaid, with no claim by AFS or its affiliates against any liquidation proceeds or any party for the unpaid balance. Accordingly, the Partnership has recorded neither an obligation nor an expense for such contingent reimbursement of the approximate $248 thousand and $560 thousand excess reimbursable administrative expenses at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively.

XML



Organization and Limited Partnership matters

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2011

Organization and Limited Partnership matters

1. Organization and Limited Partnership matters:

ATEL Capital Equipment Fund VII, L.P. (the “Partnership” or the “Fund”) was formed under the laws of the State of California on May 17, 1996 for the purpose of acquiring equipment to engage in equipment leasing and sales activities, primarily in the United States. The Partnership may continue until December 31, 2017. The General Partner of the Partnership is ATEL Financial Services, LLC (“AFS”), a California limited liability company. Prior to converting to a limited liability company structure, AFS was formerly known as ATEL Financial Corporation.

The Partnership conducted a public offering of 15,000,000 Units of Limited Partnership Interest (“Units”), at a price of $10 per Unit. On January 7, 1997, subscriptions for the minimum number of Units (120,000, $1.2 million) had been received (excluding subscriptions from Pennsylvania investors) and AFS requested that the subscriptions be released to the Partnership. On that date, the Partnership commenced operations in its primary business. Gross contributions in the amount of $150 million (15,000,000 units) were received as of November 27, 1998, exclusive of $500 of Initial Partners’ capital investment and $100 of AFS’ capital investment. The offering was terminated on November 27, 1998. As of June 30, 2011, 14,985,550 Units remain issued and outstanding.

The Partnership’s principal objectives have been to invest in a diversified portfolio of equipment that (i) preserves, protects and returns the Partnership’s invested capital; (ii) generates regular distributions to the partners of cash from operations and cash from sales or refinancing, with any balance remaining after certain minimum distributions to be used to purchase additional equipment during the reinvestment period (“Reinvestment Period”) (defined as six full years following the year the offering was terminated), which ended December 31, 2004 and (iii) provides additional distributions following the Reinvestment Period and until all equipment has been sold. The Partnership is governed by its Limited Partnership Agreement (“Partnership Agreement”).

Pursuant to the Partnership Agreement, AFS receives compensation for services rendered and reimbursements for costs incurred on behalf of the Partnership (Note 5). The Partnership is required to maintain reasonable cash reserves for working capital, the repurchase of Units and contingencies. The repurchase of Units is solely at the discretion of AFS.

As of June 30, 2011, the Partnership continues to be in the liquidation phase of its life cycle as defined in the Partnership Agreement.

These unaudited interim financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes thereto contained in the report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

XML



Guarantees

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2011

Guarantees

7. Guarantees:

The Partnership enters into contracts that contain a variety of indemnifications. The Partnership’s maximum exposure under these arrangements is unknown. However, the Partnership has not had prior claims or losses pursuant to these contracts and expects the risk of loss to be remote.

The General Partner knows of no facts or circumstances that would make the Partnership’s contractual commitments outside standard mutual covenants applicable to commercial transactions between businesses. Accordingly, the Partnership believes that these indemnification obligations are made in the ordinary course of business as part of standard commercial and industry practice, and that any potential liability under the Partnership’s similar commitments is remote. Should any such indemnification obligation become payable, the Partnership would separately record and/or disclose such liability in accordance with GAAP.

XML



Partners' capital

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2011

Partners' capital

8. Partners’ capital:

As of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, 14,985,550 Units were issued and outstanding. The Partnership had been authorized to issue up to 15,000,050 Units, including the 50 Units issued to the Initial Limited Partners, as defined.

The Partnership has the right, exercisable at the General Partner’s discretion, but not the obligation, to repurchase Units of a Unitholder who ceases to be a U.S. Citizen, for a price equal to 100% of the holder’s capital account. The Partnership is otherwise permitted, but not required, to repurchase Units upon a holder’s request. The repurchase of Fund Units is made in accordance with Section 13 of the Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership. The repurchase would be at the discretion of the General Partner on terms it determines to be appropriate under given circumstances, in the event that the General Partner deems such repurchase to be in the best interest of the Partnership; provided, the Partnership is never required to repurchase any Units. Upon the repurchase of any Units by the Fund, the tendered Units are cancelled. Units repurchased in prior periods were repurchased at amounts representing the original investment less cumulative distributions made to the Unitholder with respect to the Units. All Units repurchased during a quarter are deemed to be repurchased effective the last day of the preceding quarter, and are not deemed to be outstanding during, or entitled to allocations of net income, net loss or distributions for the quarter in which such repurchase occurs.

As defined in the Partnership Agreement, the Partnership’s Net Income, Net Losses, and Distributions are to be allocated 92.5% to the Limited Partners and 7.5% to AFS.

As defined in the Partnership Agreement, available Cash from Operations shall be distributed as follows:

First, Distributions of Cash from Operations shall be 88.5% to the Limited Partners, 7.5% to AFS and 4% to AFS or its affiliate designated as the recipient of the Incentive Management Fee, until the Limited Partners have received Aggregate Distributions in an amount equal to their Original Invested Capital, as defined, plus a 10% per annum cumulative (compounded daily) return on their Adjusted Invested Capital, as defined in the Partnership Agreement.

Second, 85% to the Limited Partners, 7.5% to AFS and 7.5% to AFS or its affiliate designated as the recipient of the Incentive Management Fee.

As defined in the Partnership Agreement, available Cash from Sales or Refinancing are to be distributed as follows:

First, Distributions of Sales or Refinancing shall be 92.5% to the Limited Partners and 7.5% to AFS, until the Limited Partners have received Aggregate Distributions in an amount equal to their Original Invested Capital, as defined, plus a 10% per annum cumulative (compounded daily) return on their Adjusted Invested Capital.

Second, 85% to the Limited Partners, 7.5% to AFS and 7.5% to AFS or its affiliate designated as the recipient of the Incentive Management Fee.

Distributions to Limited Partners were as follows (in thousands, except per Unit data):

	Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
	2011		2010		2011		2010
Distributions declared	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	2,248
Weighted average number of Units outstanding		14,985,550		14,985,550		14,985,550		14,985,550
Weighted average distributions per Unit	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	0.15

XML



Gain contingencies

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2011

Gain contingencies

6. Gain contingencies:

The Partnership’s vessel activity in the Gulf of Mexico was severely impacted by the British Petroleum (“BP”) “Deep Water Horizon” oil spill of 2010 which severely adversely impacted charter activity in the Gulf region. BP established a program to compensate those businesses and individuals suffering economic hardship and loss as a result of the Deep Water Horizon oil spill. The Partnership has submitted a claim to the BP program administrator seeking an approximate $2.8 million for loss of revenues during the period of the vessel’s diminished activity commencing at the time of the oil spill and continuing through 2010. While BP’s claim administrator reviews the Partnership’s claim, and the Partnership believes such claim to be of merit, the amount of any compensation or award from BP is currently extremely difficult to determine. As such, the potential for compensation or award has not been recorded on the Partnership’s books and records.

ATEL has chosen to litigate a claim on behalf of certain of its Funds for the under-reporting of revenue by a previous fleet manager of its marine vessels. Litigation continues relative to ATEL’s plaintiff position, seeking to recover an estimated total of $2.8 million, of which the Partnership’s portion approximates $1.4 million, of under-remitted revenues from marine vessel leasing covering years 2005 – 2007. Such amounts are not considered material to any of the Funds in any given year. While the Funds’ recovery with respect to this matter may be substantial, there is no assurance that judgment will be rendered in favor of the Funds. Originally scheduled to begin in March 2011, court proceedings have been re-scheduled to commence in September 2011. However, the outcome, either via negotiation or court mandate, is currently indeterminable.

XML



STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN PARTNERS' CAPITAL (Parenthetical) (USD $)	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2010
Distributions to Limited Partners, per Unit	$ 0.25

XML



Summary of significant accounting policies

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2011

Summary of significant accounting policies

2. Summary of significant accounting policies:

Basis of presentation:

The accompanying unaudited financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”) for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q as mandated by the Securities and Exchange Commission. The unaudited interim financial statements reflect all adjustments which are, in the opinion of the General Partner, necessary for a fair statement of financial position and results of operations for the interim periods presented. All such adjustments are of a normal recurring nature. Operating results for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year.

Certain prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation. These reclassifications had no effect on the reported financial position or results from operations.

Footnote and tabular amounts are presented in thousands, except as to Units and per Unit data.

In preparing the accompanying unaudited financial statements, the General Partner has reviewed events that have occurred after June 30, 2011, up until the issuance of the financial statements. No events were noted which would require disclosure in the footnotes to the financial statements, or adjustments thereto.

Use of estimates:

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Such estimates primarily relate to the determination of residual values at the end of the lease term, expected future cash flows used for impairment analysis purposes, and determination of the allowance for doubtful accounts.

Segment reporting:

The Partnership is not organized by multiple operating segments for the purpose of making operating decisions or assessing performance. Accordingly the Partnership operates in one reportable operating segment in the United States.

However, certain of the Partnership’s lessee customers may have international operations. In these instances, the Partnership is aware that certain equipment, primarily rail and transportation, may periodically exit the country. However, these lessee customers are US-based, and it is impractical for the Partnership to track, on an asset-by-asset and day-by-day basis, where these assets are deployed. The primary geographic regions in which the Partnership sought leasing opportunities were North America and Europe. The table below summarizes geographic information relating to the sources, by nation, of the Partnership’s total revenues for six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 and long-lived tangible assets as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 (dollars in thousands):

	For The Six Months Ended June 30,
	2011		% of Total			2010		% of Total
Revenue
United States	$	2,036		93	%	$	1,583		99	%
United Kingdom		16		1	%		16		1	%
Canada		134		6	%		—		0	%
Total International		150		7	%		16		1	%
Total	$	2,186		100	%	$	1,599		100	%

	As of June 30,					As of December 31,
	2011		% of Total			2010		% of Total
Long-lived assets
United States	$	7,904		97	%	$	8,727		100	%
United Kingdom		—		0	%		33		0	%
Canada		240		3	%		—		0	%
Total International		240		3	%		33		0	%
Total	$	8,144		100	%	$	8,760		100	%

Other loss, net:

Other loss, net consists of losses on foreign currency transactions. The table below details the Partnership’s other loss, net for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 (in thousands):

	Three Months Ended June 30,					Six Months Ended June 30,
	2011		2010			2011			2010
Foreign currency loss	$	—	$	(2	)	$	(7	)	$	(10	)

Per Unit data:

Net income (loss) and distributions per Unit are based upon the weighted average number of Limited Partnership Units outstanding during the period.

Recent accounting pronouncements:

In April 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2011-02, “A Creditor’s Determination of Whether a Restructuring Is a Troubled Debt Restructuring.” ASU 2011-02 clarifies guidance on a creditor’s evaluation of whether it has granted a concession to a borrower and a creditor’s evaluation of whether a borrower is experiencing financial difficulties. The amendments in this update are effective for the first interim or annual period beginning on or after June 15, 2011, and should be applied retrospectively to the beginning of the annual period of adoption. As a result of applying these amendments, an entity may identify receivables that are newly considered impaired. For purposes of measuring impairment of those receivables, an entity should apply the amendments prospectively for the first interim or annual period beginning on or after June 15, 2011. In addition, an entity should disclose the information required by Accounting Standards Codification paragraphs 310-10-50-33 through 50-34, which was deferred by ASU 2011-01, for interim and annual periods beginning on or after June 15, 2011. The Partnership anticipates that adoption of this update will not have a material impact on its financial position or results of operations.

In January 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-01, “Deferral of the Effective Date of Disclosures about Troubled Debt Restructurings in Update No. 2010-20.” ASU 2011-01 temporarily delays the effective date of the disclosures about troubled debt restructurings in Update 2010-20 for public entities. The delay is intended to allow the Board time to complete its deliberations on what constitutes a troubled debt restructuring. The effective date of the new disclosures about troubled debt restructurings for public entities and the guidance for determining what constitutes a troubled debt restructuring will then be coordinated. The guidance will be effective for the first interim or annual period beginning on or after June 15, 2011, and should be applied retrospectively to the beginning of the annual period of adoption. The Partnership anticipates that adoption of these additional disclosures will not have a material effect on its financial position or results of operations.

XML



Provision for credit losses

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2011

Provision for credit losses

3. Provision for credit losses:

Activity in the allowance for doubtful accounts consists of the following (in thousands):

	Accounts Receivable Allowance for Doubtful Accounts				Valuation Adjustments on Financing Receivables		Total Allowance for Credit Losses
	Finance Leases		Operating Leases		Finance Leases
Balance December 31, 2009	$	1	$	—	$	—	$	1
Provision for credit losses		9		1		—		10
Balance December 31, 2010		10		1		—		11
Provision for credit losses		—		43		—		43
Balance June 30, 2011	$	10	$	44	$	—	$	54

Accounts Receivable

Accounts receivable represent the amounts billed under operating and direct financing lease contracts which are currently due to the Partnership.

Allowances for doubtful accounts are typically established based upon their aging and historical charge off and collection experience and the creditworthiness of specifically identified lessees, and invoiced amounts. Accounts receivable deemed uncollectible are generally charged off against the allowance on a specific identification basis. Recoveries of amounts that were previously written-off are recorded as other income in the period received.

Accounts receivable are generally placed in a non-accrual status (i.e., no revenue is recognized) when payments are more than 90 days past due. Additionally, management periodically reviews the creditworthiness of companies with lease payments outstanding less than 90 days. Based upon management’s judgment, such leases may be placed in non-accrual status. Leases placed on non-accrual status are only returned to an accrual status when the account has been brought current and management believes recovery of the remaining unpaid receivable is probable. Until such time, all payments received are applied only against outstanding principal balances.

Financing Receivables

In addition to the allowance established for delinquent accounts receivable, the total allowance related solely to financing receivables also includes anticipated impairment charges on direct financing leases.

The asset underlying a direct financing lease contract is considered impaired if the estimated undiscounted future cash flows of the asset are less than its net book value. The estimated undiscounted future cash flows are the sum of the estimated residual value of the asset at the end of the asset’s expected holding period and estimates of undiscounted future rents. The residual value assumes, among other things, that the asset is utilized normally in an open, unrestricted and stable market. Short-term fluctuations in the market place are disregarded and it is assumed that there is no necessity either to dispose of a significant number of the assets, if held in quantity, simultaneously or to dispose of the asset quickly.

As of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the Partnership did not record an allowance for credit losses related to its financing receivables. The Partnership’s recorded net investment in financing receivables at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 are as follows (in thousands):

June 30, 2011	Finance Leases		Total
Allowance for credit losses:
Ending balance	$	—	$	—
Ending balance: individually evaluated for impairment	$	—	$	—
Ending balance: collectively evaluated for impairment	$	—	$	—
Ending balance: loans acquired with deteriorated credit quality	$	—	$	—
Financing receivables, net:
Ending balance	$	473	$	473
Ending balance: individually evaluated for impairment	$	473	$	473
Ending balance: collectively evaluated for impairment	$	—	$	—
Ending balance: loans acquired with deteriorated credit quality	$	—	$	—

December 31, 2010	Finance Leases		Total
Allowance for credit losses:
Ending balance	$	—	$	—
Ending balance: individually evaluated for impairment	$	—	$	—
Ending balance: collectively evaluated for impairment	$	—	$	—
Ending balance: loans acquired with deteriorated credit quality	$	—	$	—
Financing receivables, net:
Ending balance	$	522	$	522
Ending balance: individually evaluated for impairment	$	522	$	522
Ending balance: collectively evaluated for impairment	$	—	$	—
Ending balance: loans acquired with deteriorated credit quality	$	—	$	—

The Partnership evaluates the credit quality of its financing receivables on a scale equivalent to the following quality indicators related to corporate risk profiles:

Pass – Any account whose lessee/debtor, co-lessee/debtor or any guarantor has a credit rating on publicly traded or privately placed debt issues as rated by Moody’s or S&P for either Senior Unsecured debt, Long Term Issuer rating or Issuer rating that are in the tiers of ratings generally recognized by the investment community as constituting an Investment Grade credit rating; or, has been determined by the General Partner to be an Investment Grade Equivalent or High Quality Corporate Credit per its Credit Policy or has a Not Rated internal rating by the General Partner and the account is not considered by the Chief Credit Officer of the General Partner to fall into one of the three risk profiles below.

Special Mention – Any traditional corporate type account with potential weaknesses (e.g. large net losses or major industry downturns) or, any growth capital account that has less than three months of cash as of the end of the calendar quarter to fund their continuing operations. These accounts deserve management’s close attention. If left uncorrected, those potential weaknesses may result in deterioration of the Fund’s receivable at some future date.

Substandard – Any account that is inadequately protected by the current worth and paying capacity of the borrower or of the collateral pledged, if any. Accounts that are so classified have a well-defined weakness or weaknesses that jeopardize the liquidation of the debt. They are characterized by the distinct possibility that the Fund will sustain some loss as the likelihood of fully collecting all receivables may be questionable if the deficiencies are not corrected. Such accounts are on the General Partner’s Credit Watch List.

Doubtful – Any account where the weaknesses make collection or liquidation in full, on the basis of currently existing facts, conditions, and values, highly questionable and improbable. Accordingly, an account that is so classified is on the General Partner’s Credit Watch List, and has been declared in default and the General Partner has repossessed, or is attempting to repossess, the equipment it financed. This category includes impaired leases as applicable.

At June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the Partnership’s financing receivables by credit quality indicator and by class of financing receivables are as follows (in thousands):

	Finance Leases
	June 30, 2011		December 31, 2010
Pass	$	473	$	522
Special mention		—		—
Substandard		—		—
Doubtful		—		—
Total	$	473	$	522

At June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, net investment in financing receivables is aged as follows (in thousands):

June 30, 2011	30 – 59 Days Past Due		60 – 89 Days Past Due		Greater Than 90 Days		Total Past Due		Current		Total Financing Receivables		Recorded Investment>90 Days and Accruing
Finance leases	$	—	$	—	$	80	$	80	$	393	$	473	$	80
Total	$	—	$	—	$	80	$	80	$	393	$	473	$	80

December 31, 2010	30 – 59 Days Past Due		60 – 89 Days Past Due		Greater Than 90 Days		Total Past Due		Current		Total Financing Receivables		Recorded Investment>90 Days and Accruing
Finance leases	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	522	$	522	$	—
Total	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	522	$	522	$	—

The Partnership did not carry an impairment reserve on its financing receivables at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010. At June 30, 2011, certain net investments in financing receivables with related accounts receivable past due more than 90 days are still on an accrual basis based on management’s assessment of the collectability of such receivables. However, these accounts receivable are fully reserved and included in the allowance for doubtful accounts presented above. At December 31, 2010, there were no accounts receivable related to net investments in financing receivables placed in non-accrual status.

XML



Investment in equipment and leases, net

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2011

Investment in equipment and leases, net

4. Investment in equipment and leases, net:

The Partnership’s investments in equipment and leases consist of the following (in thousands):

	Balance December 31, 2010		Reclassifications & Additions/ Dispositions			Depreciation/ Amortization Expense or Amortization of Leases			Balance June 30, 2011
Net investment in operating leases	$	7,817	$	331		$	(608	)	$	7,540
Net investment in direct financing leases		522		—			(49	)		473
Assets held for sale or lease, net		421		(289	)		(1	)		131
Total	$	8,760	$	42		$	(658	)	$	8,144

Impairment of investments in leases and assets held for sale or lease:

Management periodically reviews the carrying values of its assets on leases and assets held for lease or sale. Impairment losses are recorded as an adjustment to the net investment in operating leases. No impairment losses were recorded during the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010.

The Partnership utilizes a straight line depreciation method over the term of the equipment lease for equipment on operating leases currently in its portfolio. Depreciation expense on the Partnership’s equipment was approximately $223 thousand and $411 thousand for the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, and was $609 thousand and $823 thousand for the respective six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010.

All of the property subject to leases was acquired in the years 1997 through 2002.

Operating leases:

Property on operating leases consists of the following (in thousands):

	Balance December 31, 2010			Additions			Reclassifications or Dispositions			Balance June 30, 2011
Transportation	$	26,526		$	—		$	3,291		$	29,817
Marine vessels		16,638			150			(1,111	)		15,677
Construction		431			—			—			431
Materials handling		83			—			—			83
Other		135			—			(135	)		—
		43,813			150			2,045			46,008
Less: accumulated depreciation		(35,996	)		(608	)		(1,864	)		(38,468	)
Total	$	7,817		$	(458	)	$	181		$	7,540

The average estimated residual value for assets on operating leases was 14% and 15% of the assets’ original cost at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively.

The Partnership earns revenues from its marine vessels and certain lease assets based on utilization of such assets or through fixed term leases. Contingent rentals (i.e., short-term, operating charter hire payments) and the associated expenses are recorded when earned and/or incurred. The revenues associated with these rentals are included as a component of Operating Lease Revenues, and totaled $149 thousand and $80 thousand for the respective three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, and was $178 thousand and $154 thousand for the respective six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010.

There were no operating leases in non-accrual status at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010.

Direct financing leases:

As of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, investment in direct financing leases consists of various transportation, ground support and manufacturing equipment. The following lists the components of the Partnership’s investment in direct financing leases as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 (in thousands):

	June 30, 2011			December 31, 2010
Total minimum lease payments receivable	$	727		$	921
Estimated residual values of leased equipment (unguaranteed)		75			75
Investment in direct financing leases		802			996
Less unearned income		(329	)		(474	)
Net investment in direct financing leases	$	473		$	522

There were no net investments in direct financing leases in non-accrual status as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010.

At June 30, 2011, the aggregate amounts of future minimum lease payments are as follows (in thousands):

	Operating Leases		Direct Financing Leases		Total
Six months ending December 31, 2011	$	1,820	$	194	$	2,014
Year ending December 31, 2012		2,489		368		2,857
2013		1,054		165		1,219
2014		320		—		320
2015		320		—		320
2016		27		—		27
	$	6,030	$	727	$	6,757

XML



STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN PARTNERS' CAPITAL (USD $) In Thousands, except Share data	Total	Limited Partners	General Partner
Beginning Balance at Dec. 31, 2009	$ 14,247	$ 14,247
Beginning Balance (in shares) at Dec. 31, 2009		14,985,550
Distributions to Limited Partners ($0.25 per Unit)	(3,747)	(3,747)
Distributions to General Partner	(304)		(304)
Net income (loss)	642	338	304
Ending Balance at Dec. 31, 2010	10,838	10,838
Ending Balance (in shares) at Dec. 31, 2010		14,985,550
Net income (loss)	(317)	(317)
Ending Balance at Jun. 30, 2011	$ 10,521	$ 10,521
Ending Balance (in shares) at Jun. 30, 2011		14,985,550

XML



STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (USD $) In Thousands	3 Months Ended		6 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2011	Jun. 30, 2010	Jun. 30, 2011	Jun. 30, 2010
Operating activities:
Net income (loss)	$ 577	$ (33)	$ (317)	$ (935)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to cash provided by operating activities:
Gain on sales of assets	(51)	(57)	(79)	(123)
Depreciation of operating lease assets	223	411	609	823
Provision (reversal of provision) for doubtful accounts	43	(1)	43	11
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable	(65)	(37)	43	38
Other assets	3	4	6	9
Accounts payable:
General Partner	(78)	(100)	225	276
Other	118	85	148	161
Affiliates		55		53
Unearned lease income	27	(82)	129	(48)
Net cash provided by operating activities	797	245	807	265
Investing activities:
Proceeds from sales of lease assets	126	98	187	222
Principal payments received on direct financing leases	26	14	49	33
Net cash provided by investing activities	152	112	236	255
Distributions:
Net cash used in financing activities				(2,430)
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents	949	357	1,043	(1,910)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period	2,731	1,631	2,637	3,898
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	3,680	1,988	3,680	1,988
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information:
Cash paid during the period for taxes	62	43	62	45
Schedule of non-cash transactions:
Improvements to operating lease equipment			150
General Partner
Distributions:
Distributions to Partners				(182)
Limited Partners
Distributions:
Distributions to Partners				$ (2,248)

XML



BALANCE SHEETS (USD $) In Thousands	Jun. 30, 2011	Dec. 31, 2010
ASSETS
Cash and cash equivalents	$ 3,680	$ 2,637
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $54 as of June 30, 2011 and $11 as of December 31, 2010	225	311
Investments in equipment and leases, net of accumulated depreciation of $40,472 as of June 30, 2011 and $41,618 as of December 31, 2010	8,144	8,760
Other assets	1	7
Total assets	12,050	11,715
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities:
General Partner	729	504
Other	569	271
Unearned operating lease income	231	102
Total liabilities	1,529	877
Partners' capital:
General Partner
Limited Partners	10,521	10,838
Total Partners' capital	10,521	10,838
Total liabilities and Partners' capital	$ 12,050	$ 11,715