DEF 14A

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

SCHEDULE 14A

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Securities

Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No.)

Filed by the Registrant ☒

Filed by a Party other than the Registrant ☐

Check the appropriate box:

☐	Preliminary Proxy Statement
☐	Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))
☒	Definitive Proxy Statement
	.
☐	Definitive Additional Materials
☐	Soliciting Material Pursuant to §240.14a-12

AMERISAFE, Inc.

(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check all boxes that apply):

☒	No fee required
☐	Fee paid previously with preliminary materials
☐	Fee computed on table in exhibit required by Item 25(b) per Exchange Act Rules 14a 6(i)(1) and 0-11

 

FROM OUR

Chairman of the Board

April 28, 2023

Dear AMERISAFE Shareholder:

You are cordially invited to attend the annual meeting of shareholders of AMERISAFE, Inc. The meeting will be held on Friday, June 9, 2023, beginning at 9:00 a.m. CDT at our corporate headquarters, which are located at 2301 Highway 190 West in DeRidder, Louisiana 70634.

Information about the meeting, including the nominees for election as directors and the other proposals to be considered is presented in the following notice of annual meeting and proxy statement. At the meeting, management will report on the Company’s operations during 2022 and comment on our outlook for the remainder of 2023. The report will be followed by a question and answer period.

We hope that you will attend the annual meeting. It is important that your shares be represented. Accordingly, please vote using the internet or telephone procedures described on the proxy card or sign, date and promptly mail the enclosed proxy card in the enclosed pre-addressed, postage-paid envelope.

We look forward to seeing you at the meeting on June 9th.

	Sincerely,
	Jared A. Morris Chairman

 

NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS

To be held on June 9, 2023

The 2023 annual meeting of shareholders of AMERISAFE, Inc. (the “Company”) will be held on June 9, 2023, beginning at 9:00 a.m. CDT at the Company’s corporate headquarters, which are located at 2301 Highway 190 West in DeRidder, Louisiana 70634. The meeting will be held for the following purposes:

1.to elect three directors to serve until the 2026 annual meeting of shareholders;

2.to conduct an advisory vote on the Company’s compensation of its named executive officers;

3.to conduct an advisory vote on the frequency of advisory votes on the Company's compensation of its named executive officers;

4.to ratify the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for 2023; and

5.to transact such other business as may properly come before the meeting.

Information concerning the matters to be voted upon at the meeting is set forth in the accompanying proxy statement. Also enclosed is the Company’s annual report for the year ended December 31, 2022. Holders of record of the Company’s common stock as of the close of business on April 17, 2023 are entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the meeting.

If you plan to attend the meeting and will need special assistance or accommodation, please describe your needs on the enclosed proxy card.

By Order of the Board of Directors,

 

Kathryn H. Shirley

Executive Vice President,

Chief Administrative Officer

and Secretary

IMPORTANT

Whether or not you plan to attend the meeting in person, please vote using the internet or telephone procedures described on the proxy card or by signing, dating, and promptly returning the enclosed proxy card in the pre-addressed, postage-paid envelope.

DeRidder, Louisiana

April 28, 2023

TABLE OF CONTENTS

	Page
Proposal 1 Election of Directors	3
Proposal 2 Advisory Vote on Compensation of the Company's Named Executive Officers	8
Proposal 3 Advisory Vote on the Frequency of Advisory Votes on Compensation of the Company's Named Executive Officers	8
Proposal 4 Ratification of Appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as the Company’s Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm for 2023	9
Corporate Governance and Board Information	10
Compensation Discussion and Analysis	22
Compensation Committee Report	36
Executive Compensation	37
Equity Compensation Plan Information	50
Security Ownership of Management and Certain Beneficial Holders	51
Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation	53
Audit Committee Report	54
Independent Public Accountants	55
Shareholder Proposals for the 2024 Annual Meeting of Shareholders	56
Other Matters	56

AMERISAFE, Inc.

2301 Highway 190 West

DeRidder, Louisiana 70634

PROXY STATEMENT

This proxy statement provides information in connection with the solicitation of proxies by the Board of Directors (the “Board”) of AMERISAFE, Inc. (the “Company”) for use at the Company’s 2023 annual meeting of shareholders or any postponement or adjournment thereof (the “Annual Meeting”). This proxy statement also provides information you will need in order to consider and act upon the matters specified in the accompanying notice of annual meeting. This proxy statement and the enclosed proxy card are being mailed to shareholders on or about May 2, 2023.

Record holders of the Company’s common stock as of the close of business on April 17, 2023 are entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting. Each record holder of common stock on that date is entitled to one vote at the Annual Meeting for each share of common stock held. As of April 17, 2023, there were 19,151,597 shares of common stock outstanding.

You cannot vote your shares unless you are present at the Annual Meeting or you have properly executed your proxy. You can vote by proxy in one of three convenient ways:

•by internet: visit the website shown on your proxy card and follow the instructions;

•by telephone: dial the toll-free number shown on your proxy card and follow the instructions; or

•in writing: sign, date, and return the enclosed proxy card in the enclosed pre-addressed, postage paid envelope.

You may revoke your proxy at any time prior to the vote at the Annual Meeting by:

•delivering a written notice revoking your proxy to the Company’s Secretary at the address above;

•delivering a new proxy bearing a date after the date of the proxy being revoked; or

•voting in person at the Annual Meeting.

Unless revoked as described above, all properly executed proxies will be voted at the Annual Meeting in accordance with your directions on the proxy. If a properly executed proxy gives no specific instructions, the shares of common stock represented by your proxy will be voted:

•FOR the election of three directors to serve until the 2026 annual meeting of shareholders;

•FOR the approval of the compensation of our executive officers, as disclosed in this proxy statement;

•FOR the approval of an annual advisory vote on executive compensation;

•FOR the ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for 2023; and

•at the discretion of the proxy holders with regard to any other matter that is properly presented at the Annual Meeting.

If you own shares of common stock held in “street name” and you do not instruct your broker how to vote your shares using the instructions your broker provides you, your shares will be voted in the ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for 2023, but not for any other proposal. To be sure your shares are voted in the manner you desire, you should instruct your broker how to vote your shares.

Holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of the Company’s common stock must be present, either in person or by proxy, to constitute a quorum necessary to conduct the Annual Meeting. Abstentions and broker non-votes are counted for purposes of determining a quorum and are considered present and entitled to vote.

1

The following table sets forth the voting requirements, whether broker discretionary voting is allowed and the treatment of abstentions and broker non-votes for each of the matters to be voted on at the Annual Meeting.

Proposal		Vote Necessary to Approve Proposal	Broker Discretionary Voting Allowed?	Treatment of Abstentions and Broker Non-Votes
No. 1 –	Election of directors	Plurality (that is, the largest number) of the votes cast; provided that any director that does not receive a majority of the votes cast is required to submit his or her resignation	No	Abstentions and broker non-votes are not considered votes cast and will have no effect
No. 2 –	Advisory vote on the Company's compensation of its named executive officers	Affirmative vote of a majority of the shares present, in person or by proxy, at the Annual Meeting and entitled to vote on the matter	No	Abstentions will have the effect of a vote cast against the matter and broker non-votes are not considered votes cast and will have no effect
No. 3 –	Advisory vote on the frequency of advisory votes on the Company's compensation of its named executive officers	Plurality (that is, the largest number) of the votes cast	No	Abstentions and broker non-votes are not considered votes cast and will have no effect
No. 4 –	Ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young	Affirmative vote of a majority of the shares present, in person or by proxy, at the Annual Meeting and entitled to vote on the matter	Yes	Abstentions will have the effect of a vote cast against the matter

The Company pays the costs of soliciting proxies. We have engaged Georgeson, Inc. to serve as our proxy solicitor for the Annual Meeting at a base fee of $10,000 plus reimbursement of reasonable expenses. Georgeson will conduct our broker search, solicit banks, brokers, institutional investors and hedge funds to determine voting instructions, monitor voting and deliver executed proxies to our voting tabulator. Our employees also may solicit proxies by telephone or in person. However, they will not receive additional compensation for soliciting proxies. The Company may request banks, brokers and other custodians, nominees and fiduciaries to forward copies of these proxy materials to the beneficial holders and to request instructions for the execution of proxies. The Company may reimburse these persons for their related expenses. Proxies are solicited to provide all record holders of the Company’s common stock an opportunity to vote on the matters to be presented at the Annual Meeting, even if they cannot attend the meeting in person.

2

PROPOSAL 1

ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

At the Annual Meeting, three directors will be elected to serve three-year terms expiring at our annual shareholder meeting in 2026. This section of the proxy statement contains information relating to the director nominees and the directors whose terms of office continue after the Annual Meeting. The director nominees were selected by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, or NCG Committee and approved by the Board for submission to the shareholders. The nominees for election are Michael J. Brown, G. Janelle Frost and Sean M. Traynor, each of whom currently serve as directors.

The Board recommends a vote “FOR” the election of each of the nominees.

Nominees to be elected for terms expiring at the Annual Meeting in 2026

MICHAEL J. BROWN
Age 59, has served as a director of the Company since November 2014
	Mr. Brown serves as Chair of the Compensation Committee. Mr. Brown was President of Regional Banking for First Horizon from July 2020, when First Horizon completed its merger with IberiaBank Corp., until his retirement on December 31, 2021. From September 2009 until July 2020, Mr. Brown was the Vice Chairman and Chief Operating Officer of IberiaBank Corp., managing IberiaBank’s retail and commercial banking operations. From 2001 to 2009, Mr. Brown served as Senior Executive Vice President of IberiaBank Corp. Prior to joining IberiaBank in 1999, Mr. Brown was a managing director with Bank One Capital Markets.
	Mr. Brown’s experience in the financial services industry in a number of the Company’s key markets makes him well qualified to serve as a director of the Company and enables him to serve on the Audit Committee as an “audit committee financial expert” as defined by SEC rules.

G. JANELLE FROST
Age 52, has served as a Director since April 2016
	Ms. Frost has served as the Company’s Chief Executive Officer since April 2015 and President since September 2013. Prior to becoming Chief Executive Officer, Ms. Frost served as Chief Operating Officer from May 2013 to April 2015. She served as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer from November 2008 to April 2013 and Controller from May 2004 to November 2008. Ms. Frost is the former chair of the board of directors of the New Orleans Branch of the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta. She has been employed with the Company since 1992.
	Ms. Frost’s over 25 years of experience with the Company and her performance in numerous roles with the Company gives her in-depth knowledge of the Company’s business and insurance industry. Her tenure with the Company provides valuable insight about operational and strategic matters impacting the Company.

3

SEAN M. TRAYNOR
Age 54, has served as a director of the Company since March 2020
	Mr. Traynor previously served as a director for the Company from 2001 until 2013. He is currently a general partner of Welsh, Carson, Anderson & Stowe, a private equity investment firm that he joined in March 1999. Mr. Traynor has served as a director for Innovage Holding Corp., a healthcare company, since 2015 and Managed Markets Insights and Technology since 2018. Mr. Traynor has also served as a director for Universal American Financial Corporation, a health insurer, and K2M, Inc., a provider of medical products.
	Mr. Traynor has strong expertise in the insurance and healthcare industries through his role at Welsh, Carson, Anderson & Stowe, which invests in companies in both industries. Mr. Traynor’s experience with companies in these industries provides valuable insight to the Board regarding industry trends that affect the Company.

4

Current directors whose terms expire at the Annual Meeting in 2024

PHILIP A. GARCIA
Age 66, has served as a director of the Company since 2010
	Mr. Garcia serves as Chair of the Audit Committee. He retired from the Erie Insurance Group in April 2009, where he served as executive vice president and chief financial officer for the final 12 years of his 28-year career with that company. Mr. Garcia was a director of Donegal Group Inc. from December 2009 to May 2011. Mr. Garcia possesses a strong background in financial, accounting and investment management with a publicly traded property and casualty insurance company, as evidenced by his prior service as chief financial
	officer of Erie Insurance Group. He brings substantial experience in the insurance industry to the Board, including a strategic understanding of the operations of a property and casualty insurance company, as well as an understanding of the current economic and other challenges facing our industry. He is also an inactive certified public accountant. His experience enables him to serve on the Audit Committee as an “audit committee financial expert” as defined by SEC rules.

RANDALL E. ROACH
Age 72, has served as a director of the Company since March 2007
	Mr. Roach serves as Chair of the NCG Committee. Mr. Roach is an attorney and served as the Mayor of Lake Charles, Louisiana from 2000 until 2017. In 2016 he was also appointed to serve on the legislative task force on Structural Changes in Budget and Tax Policy. Prior to assuming his duties as Mayor, Mr. Roach served as a member of the Louisiana House of Representatives from 1988 thru 1995. He also served as Chairman of the House National Resources Committee in 1994.
	As a practicing attorney, Mr. Roach was engaged in the practice of law focusing on real estate, trusts and estate and business law. He is a director of The First National Bank of Louisiana and Financial Corporation of Louisiana. Mr. Roach has also served as an adjunct instructor in the field of Business Law at McNeese State University. His experience enables him to serve on the Audit Committee as an "audit committee financial expert" as defined by SEC rules. Mr. Roach’s experience as an attorney and as an elected government official brings valuable insight to the Board given that the Company operates in a highly regulated industry. Mr. Roach’s background as an attorney, legislator and government official is particularly helpful in his role as a member of the NCG Committee.

5

Current directors whose terms expire at the Annual Meeting in 2025

TERI G. FONTENOT
Age 69, has served as a director of the Company since January 2016
	Ms. Fontenot served as President and Chief Executive Officer of Woman’s Hospital from 1996 until her retirement in March 2019. Upon her retirement, Ms. Fontenot was named Chief Executive Officer Emeritus. From 2011 to 2013, Ms. Fontenot served on the American Hospital Association Board and was the chair in 2012. Ms. Fontenot has served as a director for AMN Healthcare, a healthcare staffing provider, since September 2019. Ms. Fontenot previously served as a director for LHC Group, Inc., a national provider of in-home health care services, from March 2019 until February 2023.
	Ms. Fontenot brings to the Board substantial experience as a former chief executive officer and chief financial officer of healthcare institutions and as chair of an insurance provider for over ten years. Her experience in the healthcare and insurance industries provide her with valuable insight into the issues affecting the Company and our policyholders. She is also an inactive certified public accountant. This experience enables her to serve on the Audit Committee as an “audit committee financial expert” as defined by SEC rules.

BILLY B. GREER
Age 58, has served as a director of the Company since March 2022
	Mr. Greer is Managing Director for PGIM Private Capital, a division of Prudential Financial, a position he has held since 2012. From 2004 until 2011 Mr. Greer served as Senior Vice President of PGIM and Vice President from 1999 until 2004. He is also an inactive certified public accountant. Mr. Greer possesses deep expertise in the areas of investment management, business development and asset administration. In particular, this experience will enhance the Board’s capabilities with respect to oversight of our investment portfolio.

6

JARED A. MORRIS
Age 48, has served as a director of the Company since 2005
	Mr. J. Morris served as our lead director from November 2012 until he was appointed Chairman of the Board in April 2016. Since 2002, he has been an officer and a principal owner of Marine One Acceptance Corporation and Dumont Land, LLC, both of which are specialty finance companies. Since 2002, he has also served as an officer of Dumont Management Group, LLC, a privately held company that provides management services to various affiliated finance and investment companies. His experience enables him to serve on the Audit Committee as an “audit committee financial expert” as defined by SEC rules. He serves on the board of directors of First National Bank of DeRidder and the Audit Committee of Beauregard Health System.
	Mr. J. Morris is currently our Chairman of the Board and the former chair of the NCG Committee. In these capacities, he has taken a lead role in developing and maintaining the Company’s corporate governance policies and practices. His experience and training in financial and credit management, as well as business investment, enhances the Board’s business sophistication.

7

PROPOSAL 2

ADVISORY VOTE ON THE COMPANY’S COMPENSATION OF ITS NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

Pursuant to Section 14A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”), we are submitting the compensation of our named executive officers as disclosed in this proxy statement to our shareholders for an advisory vote. We are also holding a vote at the Annual Meeting on the frequency of shareholder votes to approve named executive officer compensation. Our Board has adopted a policy to hold annual advisory votes on executive compensation each year.

We encourage shareholders to review the information regarding our compensation practices and decisions as described below under the heading “Compensation Discussion and Analysis.” We seek to offer our employees, including our named executive officers, a competitive pay package that rewards individual contributions, performance and experience with our Company, while aligning the interests of our executive officers and other key employees with those of the Company’s shareholders. The Compensation Committee sets compensation in this manner to help ensure that our compensation practices do not put the Company at a disadvantage in attracting and retaining executives and other employees, while also helping to ensure a competitive cost structure for our Company.

The vote on this proposal is not intended to address any specific element of compensation. Rather, the vote relates to the compensation of our named executive officers, as described under the headings “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” and “Executive Compensation” in this proxy statement. The vote is advisory, which means that the vote is not binding on the Company, our Board of Directors or the Compensation Committee. However, the Compensation Committee expects to consider the outcome of this advisory vote in evaluating whether any actions are appropriate with respect to our compensation programs for our named executive officers.

The Board recommends a vote “FOR” the approval of the compensation of our named executive officers.

Proposal 3

Advisory Vote On Frequency

Of An Advisory Vote ON the company’s compensation of its named executive officers

In accordance with the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (and Section 14A of the Exchange Act), we are submitting the frequency of advisory votes on executive compensation to an advisory vote of our shareholders. In voting with respect to this Proposal, shareholders may indicate whether they would prefer that we conduct future advisory votes on executive compensation every year, every two years, or every three years. Shareholders also may, if they wish, abstain from voting on this proposal.

The Board has determined that an advisory vote each year on executive compensation is currently the appropriate approach for the Company and its shareholders. In making its recommendation, our Board considered that an annual advisory vote on executive compensation allows our shareholders to provide us with timely and direct input on the Company’s compensation policies, programs and practices. In addition, the Board also considered that a significant majority of shareholders supported an annual advisory vote on named executive officer compensation when this matter was considered at the Company’s annual shareholder meetings in 2011 and 2017.

Our Board recommends that you vote for an advisory vote on named executive officer compensation each year. This vote is advisory and not binding on the Company or our Board. However, our Board intends to evaluate the voting on this proposal in determining how frequently the Company will submit advisory votes on named executive officer compensation to our shareholders.

The proxy card provides shareholders with the opportunity to choose among four options (holding the vote every one, two or three years, or abstaining). Shareholders are not voting to approve or disapprove the recommendation of the Board.

The Board unanimously recommends that you vote "FOR" the option of every "ONE YEAR.”

8

PROPOSAL 4

RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF

ERNST & YOUNG LLP AS THE COMPANY’S INDEPENDENT

REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM FOR 2023

The Audit Committee has appointed Ernst & Young LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for 2023. The Board is asking shareholders to ratify this appointment. SEC regulations and the Nasdaq listing requirements require the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm to be engaged, retained and supervised by the Audit Committee. However, the Board considers the selection of an independent registered public accounting firm to be an important matter to shareholders. Accordingly, the Board considers a proposal for shareholders to ratify this appointment to be an opportunity for shareholders to provide input to the Audit Committee and the Board on a key corporate governance issue.

Representatives of Ernst & Young LLP are expected to be present at the Annual Meeting and will be offered the opportunity to make a statement if they so desire. They will also be available to respond to appropriate questions. For additional information regarding our independent registered public accounting firm, see “Independent Public Accountants.”

The Board recommends a vote “FOR” the ratification of Ernst & Young LLP

as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm.

9

Corporate governance and board information

Board of Directors

The Board presently consists of seven non-employee directors and one employee director. The Board is divided into three classes, with each class serving three-year terms. The term of one class expires at each annual meeting of shareholders.

Director Compensation

The elements of compensation payable to our non-employee directors in 2022 are briefly described below.

Board Service:
Annual cash retainer	$	50,000
Annual restricted stock award		75,000
Board Committee Service:
Chairman annual cash retainer	$	45,000
Audit Committee Chair annual cash retainer		20,000
Compensation Committee Chair annual cash retainer		17,500
NCG Committee Chair annual cash retainer		12,500
Risk Committee Chair annual cash retainer		12,500
Annual cash retainer for members of the Audit Committee		7,500
Annual cash retainer for members for the Compensation Committee, NCG Committee		5,000

In 2021, the Compensation Committee reviewed a director compensation survey by its independent compensation consultant. See “Role of Compensation Consultant” in Compensation Discussion and Analysis below. Based on this review the Board approved an increase to the annual restricted stock award for our non-employee directors from $50,000 to $75,000 as provided for under the 2018 Non-Employee Director Restricted Stock Plan. This increase was effective beginning in 2022 to bring director compensation closer to the median market pay. The Board also approved an increase to the annual cash retainer for Audit Committee members from $5,000 to $7,500.

Committee Chairs do not receive annual cash retainers for being members of the committees they chair. Directors do not receive additional compensation for serving as committee members of the Risk Committee, except that for 2022, the Chair of the Risk Committee received the annual cash retainer shown in the table above. In 2023, the Chair of the Risk Committee will not receive additional compensation for service as Chair of the Risk Committee. The Company reimburses directors for reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred in connection with their service as directors. Any director who is an employee of the Company does not receive additional compensation for serving as a director.

The amount of restricted stock granted to each non-employee director is equal to $75,000 divided by the closing price of our common stock on the date of the annual meeting of shareholders at which the non-employee director is elected or continues to be a member of the Board. The shares of restricted stock granted to non-employee directors generally vest at the next annual meeting of shareholders. If a non-employee director is first elected or appointed to the Board at a time other than at an annual meeting of shareholders, the non-employee director is awarded a prorated initial restricted stock grant at that time. Awards to non-employee directors are made under the Director Plan.

On June 10, 2022, each non-employee director was granted 1,486 shares of restricted stock.

10

2022 Director Compensation

The following table provides information regarding the compensation of our non-employee directors for the year ended December 31, 2022.

Name	Fees Earned or Paid in Cash		Stock Awards (1)		Total
Michael J. Brown	$	73,750	$	74,998	$	148,748
Teri G. Fontenot		61,250		74,998		136,248
Philip A. Garcia		75,000		74,998		149,998
Billy B. Greer		42,360		74,998		117,359
Jared A. Morris		111,250		74,998		186,248
Millard E. Morris (2)		62,500		74,998		137,498
Randall E. Roach		68,750		74,998		143,748
Sean M. Traynor		60,000		74,998		134,998

__________

1.The grant date fair value of each award, calculated in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 718 (“Topic 718”), was $74,998. Pursuant to SEC rules, the amounts shown in this column exclude the impact of estimated forfeitures related to service-based vesting conditions. See Note 12 to our consolidated financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2022 for information regarding the assumptions made in determining these values. As of December 31, 2022, each non-employee director held 1,486 shares of restricted stock.

2.Mr. M. Morris retired from the Board effective December 31, 2022 and forfeited the Stock Awards reported under the "Stock Awards" column shown in the table above.

Non-Employee Director Stock Ownership and Retention Guidelines

Our Board recognizes that ownership of common stock is an effective means to align the interests of our directors with those of our shareholders. The following is a summary of our stock ownership and retention guidelines for our non-employee directors.

Non-Employee Director Stock Ownership Guidelines. Non-employee directors are expected to acquire and hold during their Board service shares of our common stock equal in value to at least three times the annual cash retainer paid to our directors, or $150,000. Non-employee directors have five years from their initial election to the Board to meet these ownership guidelines.

Non-Employee Director Retention Guidelines. Directors are expected to continuously own sufficient shares to meet the guidelines once attained. Until a director satisfies the ownership guidelines, the director will be required to hold 75% of the shares of common stock received from any equity award, net of any shares used to pay the tax withholding. If a director attains compliance with the stock ownership guidelines and subsequently falls below the guidelines because of a decrease in the price of our common stock, the director will be deemed in compliance provided that the director retains the shares then held. All of our current directors satisfy these ownership guidelines other than Mr. Greer who joined the board in March 2022.

The following table provides the equity ownership of each of our non-employee directors as of December 31, 2022, measured in dollars. Ownership was calculated based on a price of $51.97 per share, the closing price of the Company’s common stock on December 30, 2022, the last trading day of the year.

11

Non-Employee Director	Total Ownership
Michael J. Brown	$	397,415
Teri G. Fontenot	$	358,282
Billy B. Greer (1)	$	90,792
Philip A. Garcia	$	1,046,104
Jared A. Morris	$	4,068,108
Millard E. Morris (2)	$	5,827,240
Randall E. Roach	$	610,544
Sean M. Traynor	$	582,688

__________

1.Mr. Greer became a director on March 15, 2022. Under our ownership guidelines, Mr. Greer has until March 15, 2027 to satisfy the ownership guidelines.

2.Mr. M. Morris retired from the Board effective December 31, 2022.

Corporate Governance

The Board and senior management of the Company believe that one of their primary responsibilities is to promote a corporate culture of accountability, responsibility and ethical conduct throughout the Company. Consistent with these principles, the Company has, among other things, adopted:

•corporate governance guidelines that describe the principles under which the Board operates;

•a code of business conduct and ethics applicable to all employees;

•written charters for each of its standing committees;

•a majority voting and director resignation policy that requires any director nominee who receives a greater number of votes “withheld” or “against” his or her election than votes “for” his or her election to tender his or her resignation as a director;

•a clawback policy regarding the recovery of incentive compensation in the event of a restatement of the Company’s financial statements filed with the SEC or any state authority. We will revise our clawback policy to comply with Rule 10D-1 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 adopted by the SEC in October 2022 once final rules are adopted by Nasdaq;

•an insider trading policy that:

•prohibits directors, executive officers, employees and each of their designees from (i) trading in our securities while in possession of material, non-public information, or otherwise using such information for their personal benefit and (ii) hedging or pledging our common stock;

•a policy that requires that Rule 10b5-1 trading plans be approved for compliance with the SEC’s final 10b5-1 rules by the Company’s Chief Compliance Officer and provided to the Chair of the NCG Committee, for review prior to approval;

•a conflict of interest policy applicable to all employees; and

•a policy regarding related party transaction oversight and approval.

Our corporate governance guidelines, code of business conduct and ethics, committee charters, majority voting and director resignation policy and certain other governance policies are available on the Company’s website (www.amerisafe.com) in the Investors section. Copies of these documents are also available upon written request to the Company’s Secretary. The Company will post information regarding any amendment to, or waiver from, its code of business conduct and ethics on its website in the Investor Relations section.

12

Management regularly meets with shareholders and potential investors. In those meetings, investors and shareholders express their views regarding the Company’s executive compensation practices and corporate governance policies. Management reports to the Board and the NCG Committee regarding the discussions at these meetings. The NCG Committee and the Board periodically review the Company’s corporate governance policies and practices. Based on these reviews, input from shareholders and recommendations from the NCG Committee, the Board adopts changes to policies and practices that it believes are in the best interests of the Company, including complying with any new SEC or Nasdaq listing requirements.

The NCG Committee periodically reviews the Company’s corporate governance policies, taking into consideration, among other things, the views of our shareholders and developments in the governance practices of other public companies.

Corporate Responsibility

AMERISAFE is defined by its corporate culture of helping to provide security for employers and their injured employees through the insurance coverage and services we offer, by paying claims to injured workers promptly and fairly during their time of need, by encouraging and supporting our employees to be actively engaged in the communities in which they live, investing in our employees and minimizing the impact we have on the environment. AMERISAFE manages its business with the goal of responsibly delivering long-term value to all of the Company’s stakeholders by adhering to the philosophy that good stewardship is good business.

During 2021, we expanded the responsibilities of our NCG and Compensation Committees to formalize the Board’s oversight of environmental and social matters. Our NCG Committee is primarily responsible for oversight of the Company’s policies and disclosures related to environmental, safety, corporate social responsibility, and corporate governance matters and coordinates with the Risk Committee with respect to such risks as appropriate. Our Compensation Committee is responsible for oversight of human capital and diversity, equity, and inclusion matters. In 2021, we also published initial sustainability disclosure on our website aligned with both the Sustainability Accounting Standards Board (SASB) Insurance Industry Standard and the Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosure (TCFD) framework. In 2022, we published our inaugural Environmental, Social and Governance (“ESG”) Report, which followed and expanded upon our initial SASB and TCFD framework disclosures. We encourage shareholders to visit the Sustainability section of our website (www.amerisafe.com) to view our ESG Report. We intend to publish ESG reports on an annual basis.

Below are highlights regarding our sustainability practices.

Diversity, Equity and Inclusion. With the support of our Board of Directors, we are committed to enhancing diversity at AMERISAFE. We strive to promote inclusion through our Company values and behaviors, and aim to lead by example. The unique differences of each individual are representative of our exceptional workforce, where service to each other is the foundation of service to our customers. Two of our eight directors are women, one director is African American and one director is Hispanic. Approximately 64% of our current workforce is female and 36% male. Women represent 54% of AMERISAFE’s leadership (defined as vice president level and above), including our CEO. In terms of racial and ethnic diversity, we believe our workforce and board demographics are representative of our geographic location, but we remain focused on enhancing our diversity, equity and inclusion strategy. Further, we train our employees on unconscious bias.

Environmental, Social, and Governance Factors in Investment Management Strategies. We are heavily regulated, and our investment policy statement must comply with applicable laws. Our Board has established an investment policy governing our investments, which is reviewed at least annually. The principal objectives of our investment strategy are to preserve capital and surplus and to maintain appropriate liquidity for corporate requirements. Our Board is aware of the value in integrating ESG into our investment policy and works with our management-level Investment Committee to evaluate and develop any such considerations into its existing investment policy.

Environmental. As a monoline workers' compensation insurer, we do not have the same exposure to weather-related events as property and casualty insurers. Currently, our Enterprise Risk Management

13

program, led by our Chief Risk Officer, assesses climate-related risks in terms of the potential impact on the industries of our policyholders and their employees. However, we focus on high risk industries; therefore, we recognize the need to take into account certain geographic metrics in assessing our exposure to climate related factors as they affect the risks we insure.

In addition, we recognize we are exposed to operational risk in light of our Louisiana headquarters location, and have an internal disaster recovery plan in place to mitigate such risk.

We seek opportunities to capture environmental efficiencies. Starting early in the 2000’s, AMERISAFE initiated a program to reduce the use and storage of paper and focus on migrating our records to electronic form. Almost all Company records are now stored electronically. This has decreased our usage of paper and ink, increased efficiency, and saved money for the Company. Additionally, the Company is focused on recycling of paper, cardboard, plastic bottles, aluminum cans and batteries. The Company is also replacing existing florescent and incandescent lighting with LED lights, as well as improved systems that monitor heating and air conditioning, to reduce energy consumption and save costs.

We recognize there is a significant transition currently underway to a low carbon economy. This shift is creating new and growing existing green jobs in various industries. We are exploring how to track our coverage of these green jobs among our policyholders and measure growth over time.

The Communities We Serve. We actively engage and support local communities through agencies such as the Community Foundation of Southwest Louisiana and the Southwest Louisiana Economic Development Alliance. In 2022, the Company made a donation to Beauregard Health System in DeRidder, Louisiana to support healthcare in our rural community. The Company supports numerous other charitable and social organizations in the communities in which we operate. To encourage a culture of giving back to the communities in which we operate, the Company allows all employees paid time off for volunteer activities.

In 2022, we launched a new Impact Committee to help the company focus our charitable giving and corporate volunteering efforts. The Impact Committee is comprised of employees at various levels of the company, different departments, and locations. It is responsible for selection of recipients of monetary donations over the course of each calendar year, as well as coordinating volunteer opportunities for employees to engage in within the communities we serve.

Protecting the People We Serve. Protecting the people we serve is what matters most. We employ Field Safety Professionals or FSPs with first-hand experience in the industries that we underwrite. With FSPs deployed around the country, we strive to ensure that workers are safe by providing a clear observation of safety practices with verbal and written recommendations for improvement. Even prior to underwriting a policy, we conduct thorough safety visits that focus on a policyholder’s operations, loss exposures and existing safety controls to prevent potential losses. Our safety visits consider employee experience, turnover, training, previous loss history and corrective actions, workplace conditions, equipment conditions and the use of fall protection, respiratory protection or other safety devices. Over 90% of new voluntary business policyholders were inspected prior to offering a premium quote.

In addition to these in-person safety trainings, we provide our policyholders with online resources for education and training that are available 24/7. We believe our safety visits and safety training help protect workers and prevent catastrophic workplace accidents. Employers value us for being their safety partners and our agents value the depth of our safety resources. Our mission of providing quality insurance services to our customers is reflective of our commitment to the health and safety of our employees and insureds.

Customer-focused Approach. We are proud of our personal, high-touch model with policyholders. In the event of a claim, our adjusters are on the ground working with injured workers generally within 48 hours of the filed claim. We are physically there to represent the injured worker, walk them through the claims process, and improve the quality of their outcomes. One adjuster is solely responsible for each injured worker and the claim loads of our adjusters are less than half that of other peers. To further ensure the best experience possible for the policyholder and injured worker, our claims adjusters are supported by Nurse Case Managers and other knowledgeable resources so the adjuster can be dedicated to the needs of the injured worker. Our customer-focused approach allows us to provide high

14

quality of service focused on expedient recovery and early return to work. Our customer retention rate is over 90%.

Our Employees. The retention, growth, and development of our employees is critical to our success. We believe our average employee tenure of 10.7 years speaks to our successful efforts on these fronts.

We are committed to the health, safety and wellness of our employees, as the success of our business is fundamentally connected to the well-being of our people. Our benefit offerings are designed to meet the varied and evolving needs of a diverse workforce.

We provide employees with a 401K plan with company matching contributions, health insurance plans, dental, vision and other employee benefits. We also provide employees time off for annual wellness exams, reimbursements of health club memberships, confidential counseling services, quarterly wellness luncheons and an annual health fair to promote a culture of wellness. The Company has also established an endowment to provide scholarships to dependents of our employees and members of the community in which we do business, recognizing the importance of educating future generations. Since 2016 we have maintained a partnership with the Community Foundation of Southwest Louisiana to provide tax-free assistance to employees that have experienced a catastrophic event through an employee assistance fund. In addition to funding provided by the Company, this fund also allows employees to make a monetary donation to assist their fellow employees.

In 2022, we conducted an employee engagement survey, during which employees generally expressed that they believe they have resources and training needed to do their jobs, and that their roles made good use of their skills and abilities.

Board Leadership

The Board has appointed Jared A. Morris as Chairman of the Board. As Chairman, his key responsibilities include:

•calling meetings of directors and independent directors;

•presiding at the annual meeting, meetings of the Board, including executive sessions of the independent directors;

•acting as liaison between the board and management;

•overseeing the preparation of proxy materials;

•working with the NCG Committee to ensure proper committee structure, including reviewing committee and committee chair assignments, and the effectiveness of the Board;

•approving the quality, quantity, appropriateness and timeliness of information sent to the Board as well as setting meeting agendas;

•facilitating the Board’s approval of the number and frequency of Board and committee meetings as well as meeting schedules to assure that there is sufficient time for discussion of all agenda items; and

•any such other actions or duties deemed necessary by the Board.

Our Corporate Governance Guidelines do not require that the roles of Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer be held by different persons, as the Board believes that effective board leadership structure can depend on the experience, skills and personal interaction among individuals in leadership roles. These leadership roles are currently filled separately by our non-executive Chairman of the Board, Jared A. Morris, and by our Chief Executive Officer, G. Janelle Frost. The Board believes this leadership structure affords the Company an effective combination of management and non-management experience, continuity and independence that currently serves the Board and the Company well.

Director Independence and Attributes

As part of the Company’s corporate governance guidelines, the Board has established a policy requiring a majority of the members of the Board to be independent, as that term is defined in the Nasdaq listing requirements. The Board has determined that each of its current non-employee directors, Mr.

15

Brown, Ms. Fontenot, Mr. Garcia, Mr. Greer, Mr. J. Morris, Mr. Roach and Mr. Traynor, is independent of the Company and its management within the meaning of the Nasdaq listing requirements.

The following matrix presents our Board diversity statistics in accordance with Nasdaq Rule 5606, as self-disclosed by our directors, as well as the skills and experiences of each of our directors. While the Board satisfies the minimum objectives of Nasdaq Rule 5605(f)(3) by having at least one director who identifies as female and at least one director who identifies as a member of an Underrepresented Minority (as defined by Nasdaq Rules), as we pursue future Board recruitment efforts, our NCG Committee will continue to seek out candidates who can contribute to the diversity of views and perspectives of the Board. This includes seeking out individuals of diverse races and ethnicities, a balance in terms of gender, and individuals with diverse perspectives informed by other personal and professional experiences.

	Brown	Fontenot	Frost	Garcia	Greer	J. Morris	Roach	Traynor
Skills and Experience
Executive Leadership	✓	✓	✓	✓		✓	✓
Financial/Accounting	✓	✓	✓	✓	✓	✓	✓	✓
Human Resources/Compensation	✓	✓	✓			✓	✓	✓
Strategic Planning/Oversight	✓	✓	✓	✓	✓	✓		✓
Innovation/Technology/Cybersecurity				✓				✓
Enterprise Risk Management	✓	✓	✓	✓	✓	✓	✓	✓
Corporate Governance and Sustainability	✓	✓	✓	✓	✓	✓	✓	✓
Marketing/Sales	✓				✓	✓		✓
Tenure and Independence
Tenure (years)(1)	8	7	7	13	1	18	16	3
Independence	✓	✓		✓	✓	✓	✓	✓
Gender Identity
Male	✓			✓	✓	✓	✓	✓
Female		✓	✓
Demographics
Age	59	69	52	66	58	48	72	54
African American or Black					✓
Hispanic				✓
White	✓	✓	✓			✓	✓	✓

__________

1.Board tenure reflects service on the Board since the Company’s initial public offering in 2005.

Board Meetings

The Board held five meetings during 2022. Each director serving on the Board in 2022 attended at least 75% of the total number of meetings of the Board and committees on which he or she served. Under the Company’s corporate governance guidelines, each director is expected to devote the time necessary to appropriately discharge his or her responsibilities and to rigorously prepare for, attend and participate in all Board meetings and meetings of Board committees on which he or she serves.

Annual Meetings of Shareholders

The Company’s directors are encouraged to attend our annual shareholder meetings, but we do not currently have a policy relating to directors’ attendance at these meetings. Six of our then nine directors, Mr. J. Morris, Mr. Brown, Ms. Fontenot, Ms. Frost, Mr. Greer and Mr. Roach, attended our 2022 annual meeting of shareholders, either in person or by teleconference.

Audit Committee

The Audit Committee currently consists of Mr. Garcia (Chair), Mr. Brown, Ms. Fontenot, Mr. J. Morris and Mr. Roach. The Audit Committee oversees our accounting and financial reporting processes and the audits of the Company’s financial statements. The functions and responsibilities of the Audit Committee include:

•reviewing, monitoring and assessing the Company’s policies and compliance procedures with respect to business practices, including the adequacy of the Company’s internal controls over accounting and financial reporting;

16

•engaging the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm and conducting an annual review of the independence of that firm;

•pre-approving and approving any non-audit engagements with the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm;

•reviewing the annual audited financial statements and quarterly financial information with management and the independent registered public accounting firm, including disclosures regarding internal controls;

•reviewing with the independent registered public accounting firm the scope and the planning of the annual audit;

•reviewing and discussing with management the findings and recommendations of the independent registered public accounting firm;

•discussing with the independent registered public accounting firm the conduct of the annual audit, including management’s response;

•overseeing compliance with applicable legal and regulatory requirements and the Company’s Code of Conduct, including obtaining applicable reports and assurances;

•reviewing with the Company’s internal auditor the plans and scope of audit activities and the annual report of audit activities, examinations and related results;

•establishing procedures for the receipt, retention and treatment of complaints received by the Company regarding accounting, internal accounting controls or auditing matters;

•establishing procedures for the confidential, anonymous submission by employees of concerns regarding questionable accounting or auditing matters;

•reviewing the appointment and replacement of the Company’s internal audit officer and any third party internal audit service provider;

•discussing risk assessment and management policies and the Company’s financial risk exposure;

•discussing with the Company’s general counsel any legal matters that may have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements or compliance policies;

•approving related party transactions exceeding $50,000 in aggregate value;

•reviewing the adequacy of the Audit Committee charter on an annual basis; and

•preparing the Audit Committee report to be included in our annual proxy statement.

The Audit Committee met seven times during 2022. Our independent registered public accounting firm reports directly to the Audit Committee. Each member of the Audit Committee has the ability to read and understand fundamental financial statements, and the Board has also determined that Mr. Brown, Ms. Fontenot, Mr. Garcia, Mr. J. Morris and Mr. Roach each meet the requirements of an “audit committee financial expert” as defined by SEC rules. The Board has determined that each member of the Audit Committee is “independent” as defined in the Nasdaq listing requirements and SEC requirements relating to the independence of audit committee members. The Audit Committee has the authority to engage independent counsel and other advisors as the Committee deems necessary to carry out its duties.

Compensation Committee

The Compensation Committee currently consists of Mr. Brown (Chair), Mr. Garcia, Mr. Greer, Mr. J. Morris and Mr. Traynor. The Compensation Committee has sole authority for establishing, administering and reviewing the Company’s policies, programs and procedures for compensating our executive officers and the members of the Board. The Compensation Committee may delegate its responsibilities to a subcommittee comprised of Compensation Committee members. The functions and responsibilities of the Compensation Committee include:

•reviewing, determining and approving, at least annually, corporate goals and objectives relevant to the compensation of the Company’s executive officers;

17

•evaluating the performance of and determining the compensation for the Company’s executive officers, including its chief executive officer;

•administering and making recommendations to the Board with respect to the Company’s equity and incentive compensation plans;

•performing a risk assessment of the Company’s compensation plans and policies;

•overseeing regulatory compliance with respect to compensation matters;

•reviewing and approving employment or severance arrangements with the Company’s executive officers;

•overseeing the Company’s policies and practices relating to human capital and workforce diversity matters;

•reviewing director compensation policies and making recommendations to the Board;

•engaging, and determining the independence of, any compensation consultant;

•reviewing compliance with the Company’s stock ownership guidelines by our executive officers;

•reviewing the adequacy of the Compensation Committee charter on an annual basis; and

•reviewing and approving the Compensation Discussion and Analysis and the Compensation Committee Report to be included in our annual proxy statement.

The Compensation Committee met seven times during 2022. The Board has determined that each member of the Compensation Committee is independent under the Nasdaq listing requirements.

The Compensation Committee has the sole authority to retain and terminate compensation consultants to assist in the evaluation of director or executive officer compensation and the sole authority to approve the fees and other retention terms of such compensation consultants. The committee may also retain independent counsel and other independent advisors to assist it in carrying out its responsibilities. For more information regarding the role of our executive officers and the Compensation Committee’s independent compensation consultant in determining or recommending the amount or form of executive and director compensation, see “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” below.

Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee

The NCG Committee currently consists of Mr. Roach (Chair), Ms. Fontenot, Mr. J. Morris and Mr. Traynor. The functions and responsibilities of the NCG Committee include:

•developing and recommending corporate governance principles and procedures applicable to the Board and the Company’s employees;

•recommending committee composition and assignments;

•identifying individuals qualified to become directors;

•recommending director nominees;

•recommending whether incumbent directors should be nominated for re-election to the Board;

•reporting, at least annually, on succession planning, including appropriate contingencies in case our Chief Executive Officer retires, resigns or is incapacitated;

•reviewing any possible conflicts of interest of directors or management;

•providing oversight of the Company’s policies, strategies and programs related to environmental, social and corporate governance matters relevant to the Company, in coordination with the Company’s other committees as appropriate;

•reviewing the adequacy of the NCG Committee charter on an annual basis; and

•overseeing, at least annually, an evaluation of the performance of the Board and the Company’s management in relation to the Company’s corporate governance guidelines.

18

The NCG Committee met four times during 2022. The Board has determined that each member of the NCG Committee is independent under the Nasdaq listing requirements.

The NCG Committee has the sole authority to retain and terminate any search firm to assist in the identification of director candidates and the sole authority to set the fees and other retention terms of such search firms. The committee may also retain independent counsel and other independent advisors to assist it in carrying out its responsibilities.

Qualifications for Director Nominees. In considering director nominees, the NCG Committee considers a number of factors, including the following:

•whether the nominee is “independent” as determined in accordance with the rules promulgated by the SEC, the Nasdaq listing requirements and the Company’s corporate governance guidelines;

•the ability and willingness to participate in Board activities, including attendance at, and active participation in, Board and committee meetings;

•the ability and willingness to represent the best interests of all of the Company’s shareholders;

•personal and professional qualities, characteristics, attributes, accomplishments and reputation in the business community, insurance industry and otherwise;

•increasing the diversity of viewpoints, backgrounds and experiences in addition to those of existing directors and other nominees;

•consistent demonstration of integrity;

•the ability to exercise sound business judgment;

•current knowledge and relationships in the markets and regions in which the Company does business and in the insurance industry and other industries relevant to the Company’s business;

•reputation in a particular field or area of expertise; and

•the skills and personality of the nominee and how the committee perceives the nominee will be a fit with existing directors and other nominees in maintaining a Board that is collegial and responsive to the needs of the Company and its shareholders.

The NCG Committee will also consider other criteria for director candidates included in its committee charter, the Company’s corporate governance guidelines or as may be established from time to time by the Board. The NCG Committee has not adopted a separate policy pertaining to the consideration of diversity in the selection of nominees to the Board; however, as noted above, diversity is one factor considered by the NCG Committee in evaluating director candidates. The NCG Committee will identify nominees based upon recommendations by committee members or other Board members, members of the Company’s management or, as discussed below, by shareholders of the Company. Upon identifying a potential nominee, members of the NCG Committee will interview the candidate, and based upon that interview, make a recommendation to the Board.

Shareholder Recommendations. The Company has adopted a policy regarding shareholder recommended director candidates, a copy of which is available on the Investors section of the Company’s website. Consistent with this policy, the NCG Committee will evaluate director candidates recommended by a shareholder according to the same criteria as a candidate identified by the NCG Committee.

Shareholders may recommend candidates at any time, but to be considered by the NCG Committee for inclusion in the Company’s proxy statement for the next annual meeting of shareholders, recommendations must be submitted in writing no later than 150 calendar days before the first anniversary of the date on which the Company first mailed its proxy materials for the prior year’s annual meeting of shareholders. A shareholder’s notice must contain the following:

•the name of the shareholder recommending the director candidate for consideration, the name of the director candidate, and the written consent of the shareholder and the director candidate to be publicly identified;

19

•a written statement by the director candidate agreeing to be named in the Company’s proxy materials and to serve as a member of the Board (and any committee of the Board to which the director candidate is assigned to serve by the Board) if nominated and elected;

•a written statement by the shareholder and the director candidate agreeing to make available to the NCG Committee all information reasonably requested in connection with the NCG Committee’s consideration of the director candidate; and

•the director candidate’s name, age, business and residential address, principal occupation or employment, number of shares of the Company’s common stock and other securities beneficially owned, a resume or similar document detailing personal and professional experiences and accomplishments and all other information relating to the director candidate that would be required to be disclosed in a proxy statement or other filing made in connection with the solicitation of proxies for the election of directors pursuant to the Exchange Act, SEC rules and the listing requirements and other criteria established by Nasdaq.

The shareholder’s notice must be signed by the shareholder recommending the director candidate for consideration and sent to the following address: AMERISAFE, Inc., 2301 Highway 190 West, DeRidder, Louisiana 70634, Attn: Corporate Secretary (Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee Communication/Director Candidate Recommendation).

Risk Committee and Risk Management

The Board views risk management as one of its primary oversight responsibilities. The Board initially formed the Risk Committee in 2010. The Risk Committee’s charter provides that all members of the Board are members of the Risk Committee. Mr. J. Morris serves as chair of the Risk Committee and establishes the agenda for the meetings. Risk Committee members periodically receive presentations on risk-related topics from the Company’s management. The Committee provides oversight in the areas described below. In performing this oversight function, at least annually and more frequently as may be appropriate, the committee meets with Company management to review these operational areas:

•Underwriting. Review the strategies, processes, and controls pertaining to the underwriting of insurable risks and the pricing of such risks, including new insurance products or lines of business that are likely to have a positive or negative material impact on the Company’s risk profile.

•Claims. Review the strategies, processes, and controls relating to the settlement of claims.

•Investment Operations. Review the strategies, processes, and controls pertaining to the Company’s investment operations. This review includes long-term strategy, the Company’s investment policy & guidelines, investment performance and liquidity, compliance with applicable laws and regulations, any changes to investment accounting methods and the approval of the hiring of external investment managers, if any.

•Retention Levels and Reinsurance. Review the strategies, processes, and controls pertaining to the Company’s determination of appropriate levels of retention of insured risk and appropriate levels and types of reinsurance for its insurance subsidiaries, as well as the financial strength of the reinsurers with whom they conduct business;

•Risk and Information Services. Oversee the implementation, execution, and performance of the Company’s enterprise risk management program;

•Business Continuity Plan. Review the strategies, processes, and controls pertaining to business continuity and executive crisis management for the Company and its business operations; and

•Cybersecurity Practices. Review the Company’s strategies, governing and management framework, security principles, training and evaluations for cybersecurity threats;

The Committee also coordinates with the Company’s other committees regarding risks stemming from matters over which these other committees have primary oversight responsibility, including risks stemming from the ESG-related matters. Further, on an ad hoc basis, and as otherwise directed by the Board, the Committee reviews specific operational segments of the Company that may pose unusual and significant risks that could have a material impact on the risk profile of the Company.

20

The Risk Committee met four times in 2022. The Risk Committee has the authority to select, retain, terminate, and approve the fees and other terms of retention of special counsel, experts and consultants. This Committee also has direct access to all Company employees.

In addition to the activities of the Risk Committee, the Board monitors risks arising from financial reporting and controls through its Audit Committee and risks related to compensation through its Compensation Committee.

Succession Planning

Our Board considers the evaluation of management and succession planning to be one of its most important responsibilities. The Board’s goal is to have a long-term program for effective senior leadership and development, with appropriate contingencies in case our chief executive officer, or any of our other executive officers, retires, resigns or is incapacitated.

In the Board’s succession planning program, internal candidates for the executive positions, including the chief executive officer, are identified and evaluated based on criteria considered predictive of success at the senior management level. This program incorporates 360 reviews and related evaluations for each individual. The assessment includes a development plan, including executive coaching, for each individual.

Our Corporate Governance Guidelines provides that the NCG Committee report to the Board on succession planning at least annually. The chief executive officer is responsible for advising the Board regarding her recommendations and evaluations of potential successors, together with a review of any development plans for these individuals. The Board, with the assistance of the NCG Committee, evaluates potential successors to the CEO, as well as other members of senior management.

Communications with the Board

Any shareholder or other interested party who wishes to communicate directly with the Board or any of its members may do so by writing to: Board of Directors, c/o AMERISAFE, Inc., 2301 Highway 190 West, DeRidder, Louisiana 70634, Attn: Corporate Secretary. The mailing envelope should clearly indicate whether the communication is intended for the Board as a group, the non-employee directors or a specific director.

21

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

This Compensation Discussion and Analysis, or CD&A, is designed to provide shareholders with an understanding of the Company’s compensation philosophy and objectives, as well as the analysis that the Compensation Committee (referred to in this CD&A as the “Committee”) performed in setting executive compensation. It discusses the determination of how and why, in addition to what, actions were taken by the Committee with respect to compensation for each of our executive officers during 2022. Those individuals are:

•G. Janelle Frost, President and Chief Executive Officer

•Anastasios Omiridis, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (as of September 2022)

•Vincent J. Gagliano, Executive Vice President and Chief Risk Officer

•Andrew B. McCray, Executive Vice President and Chief Underwriting Officer

•Kathryn H. Shirley, Executive Vice President, Chief Administrative Officer and Secretary

•Neal A. Fuller, Former Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (until September 2022)

Executive Summary

Recent Company Performance

We are a holding company that markets and underwrites workers’ compensation insurance through our insurance subsidiaries in 27 states. The Company had solid operating performance during 2022, in a declining premium environment, with net income of $55.6 million and a combined ratio of 83.6%. Our earnings per diluted share were $2.88 and our return on average equity was 15.5% compared with $3.39 and 15.7% in 2021. Total shareholder return was 6.4% in 2022, compared to the P&C Small-Cap Index of -9.2% and the P&C Mid-Cap Index of -2.5%. The Company’s average annual total shareholder return for the three-year and five-year periods ended December 31, 2022 was 0.7% and 4.7%, respectively. The P&C Small Cap Index average annual return for the three and five-year periods ended December 31, 2022 was 2.1% and 4.3%, respectively. The P&C Mid-Cap Index average annual return for the three-year and five-year periods ended December 31, 2022 was 4.8% and 7.2%, respectively.

The Company also measures its performance by tracking its growth in book value per share plus dividends paid to shareholders. In 2022, this growth was $1.19 compared to a starting book value per share of $20.62, for a change of 5.8%. For the three years ended in 2022, this growth was $9.26 off a starting book value of $22.29, for a compounded average annual change of 12.3%. For the five years ended in 2022, this growth was $18.33 off a starting book value of $22.10, for a compounded average annual change of 12.8%.

In 2022, the Company paid regular quarterly dividends of $1.24 per share in the aggregate and an extraordinary dividend of $4.00 per share, or total dividends of $5.24 per share. Effective February 2023, the Board of Directors increased the regular quarterly dividend from $0.31 per share to $0.34 per share, an increase of 9.7%. Although the Board presently intends to pay a regular quarterly dividend, dividends are considered each quarter for approval.
 

Executive Transition

In September 2022, Mr. Fuller relinquished the role of Chief Financial Officer and fully retired from the Company in December 2022. Mr. Omiridis was appointed our new Chief Financial Officer in September 2022.

Compensation Best Practices

The Committee annually reviews and periodically modifies our executive compensation program to retain and attract top executive talent to the Company and ensure that our program is both aligned with

22

the interests of our shareholders and meets evolving governance standards. The following highlights some of the compensation and governance best practices that are part of our program:

•Performance-Based Annual Incentive Plan—Our annual incentive compensation plan rewards our executives for achievement of pre-established individual performance goals.

•LTIP Awards are Performance-Based—Since 2017, 100% of the awards under our long-term incentive program for executive management are in the form of performance awards that reward exceptional financial performance relative to a peer group of property and casualty insurers.

•No Tax “Gross-Ups”—We do not provide any tax “gross-up” payments in connection with compensation or other benefits provided by the Company.

•Clawback Policy—Both our annual and long-term incentive awards are subject to a compensation recoupment policy that permits the Committee to seek recovery of incentive awards paid if there is a restatement of the Company’s financial statements.

•Independent Compensation Consultant—The Committee engages an independent compensation consultant to prepare surveys of executive officer and director compensation based on a peer group comprised of publicly traded companies.

•Double Trigger Severance Payments—The employment agreements with our executive officers do not provide for single trigger cash payments upon a change in control; our executives are entitled to severance only upon certain circumstances as the result of a termination of employment, and these payments are the same whether or not the termination is related to a change in control.

•Double Trigger Vesting—Awards under our long-term incentive program only vest in connection with a change in control if the executive experiences a qualifying termination of employment.

•Risk Review—The Committee conducts an annual risk review of the Company’s executive compensation program, policies and practices.

•Oversight of 10b5-1 Plans—The Board adopted 10b5-1 policies and procedures, which include Board oversight of 10b5-1 plan transactions.

•Independent Advisors—The Committee helps ensure the independence of all Committee advisors by limiting the advisors ability to perform other services for the Company.

•Anti-Hedging and Anti-Pledging Policies—The Company prohibits its executives, directors and employees from hedging or pledging Company securities.

•Stock Ownership and Holding Requirements—Our executive officers are required to maintain certain levels of ownership of Company securities and are required to hold all shares received as compensation until the applicable guideline amount is achieved (net of shares used or sold to pay the exercise price or tax withholding). After meeting the applicable guideline, our executive officers are required to hold 20% of the shares received as compensation (net of shares used or sold to pay the exercise price or tax withholding).

23

2022 Program Changes

For 2022, the Committee reviewed a compensation survey prepared by its independent compensation consultant, which concluded that the base salaries of our executives were below the median of our compensation peer group described below. As discussed in more detail below, after reviewing this report and the base salaries and target annual and long-term incentive compensation of our executive officers, the Committee:

•Approved base salary increases for each of our executive officers in order to bring our executives’ base salaries closer to the median of our peers and remain competitive while maintaining a range commensurate with Company increases overall. These increases also had the effect of increasing our executives’ target annual and long-term incentive opportunities, which are expressed as a percentage of base salary.

•Revised the performance metrics under our 2022 long-term incentive program awards to (i) increase the weight of direct premiums written to align with Company performance objectives, and (ii) eliminate the relative shareholder return modifier previously in place, given that our peer group does not consistently use the measure in their compensation programs; the peer group primarily consisted of multi-line publicly traded companies that are not representative of the performance of a mono-line workers’ compensation carrier like the Company; and the structure of the long-term incentive plan limited the effect of the total shareholder return modifier.

Compensation Program Objectives

Our compensation program is intended to attract, retain and motivate the key people necessary to enable our Company to operate effectively and profitably over the long-term. The Committee believes that executive compensation should align the interests of the Company’s executives and other key employees with those of the Company and its shareholders. Our compensation program is also designed to differentiate compensation based upon individual contribution, performance and experience with our Company.

In establishing compensation, the Committee seeks to provide employees, including our executive officers, with a competitive total compensation package. The Committee sets compensation in this manner to ensure that our compensation practices do not put the Company at a disadvantage in attracting and retaining executives and other employees, while also ensuring a competitive cost structure for our Company.

Compensation Processes

Our compensation program for executives is designed and implemented under the direction of the Committee, which is currently comprised of the following five independent directors: Mr. Brown (chair), Mr. Garcia, Mr. Greer, Mr. J. Morris, and Mr. Traynor.

2022 Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation

At our annual meeting of shareholders in June 2022, more than 99% of the votes cast on the say-on-pay proposal were in support of our executive compensation program. The Committee considered the results of this advisory vote and believes the results affirm shareholder approval of the Board’s approach to the Company’s executive compensation program. As noted above the Committee is continually evaluating our executive compensation and has made changes in the past few years to further align the program with our shareholders’ interests and to take into consideration the results of market surveys and other information prepared by the Committee’s compensation consultant.

Role of Compensation Consultant

Since early 2012, the Committee has engaged McLagan, an AON Hewitt Company, as its independent compensation consultant. Pursuant to Company policy, McLagan does not provide services to the Company other than the consulting services it provides to the Committee. The Committee is solely responsible for the appointment, compensation and oversight of the compensation consultant.

24

McLagan attends Committee meetings, when requested by the Committee, prepares executive compensation surveys, and generally advises on executive compensation matters including the peer group composition for purposes of the surveys, pay levels and pay composition, and annual and long-term incentive plan design. McLagan also provides market data, analysis, and advice regarding the CEO and executive officer compensation to the Committee as well as director compensation surveys and advice. As required by SEC rules, the Committee assessed the independence of McLagan and concluded that McLagan’s work did not raise any conflicts of interest.

Compensation Surveys

McLagan conducted the most recent executive compensation survey in 2021. The “2021 Survey”, reviewed by the Committee in the fall of 2021, was used in setting compensation for 2022.

The 2021 Survey compared the compensation for our executive officers against a peer group of 15 publicly traded insurance companies. The 2021 Survey also included a review of the Company’s annual and long-term incentive compensation plan design. McLagan used Company target compensation for 2021 and peer group compensation data for 2020 in its preparation of the 2021 Survey. The Committee reviewed the 2021 Survey results in assessing the level of salary and annual and long-term target award opportunities to our executives and approving changes to the target compensation levels and annual and long-term compensation plan design for our executive officers in 2022.

Peer Group Construction. The Committee used a rigorous process to select peer companies for comparing executive pay in the 2021 Survey, which included ranking the companies by premiums written, total revenue, combined ratio, lines of insurance business, multi-line versus mono-line property-casualty insurer, number of states doing business in, and investment mix. With the assistance of McLagan, the Committee selected the following 15 publicly traded companies as its peer group for the 2021 Survey. Compared to the peer group used in the 2019 survey, three prior companies have been removed and two new companies were added based on the selection criteria.

•Atlantic American Corp.	•Kingstone Companies, Inc.
•Conifer Holdings, Inc.	•Kinsale Capital Group, Inc.
•Donegal Group	•NI Holdings, Inc.
•Employers Holdings, Inc.	•Palomar Holdings, Inc.
•Global Indemnity Limited	•Protective Insurance Corporation
•Hallmark Financial Services	•Safety Insurance Group
•Heritage Insurance Holdings, Inc.	•United Fire Group, Inc.
•James River Group Holdings

The results of the 2021 Survey indicated that (1) the Company’s aggregate executive officer 2020 target compensation was below the market median for each pay element, (2) the average total target direct compensation for each of the named executive officers was below the market median, and (3) while pay levels for named executive officers were low compared to the market median, the mix of pay is generally aligned with that of the market. The Committee uses survey data as a market reference to assess the competitiveness of our compensation programs and does not mandate target ranges for our named executive officers' salaries, annual incentive opportunities, long-term incentive opportunities, or total direct compensation levels as compared to the peer group. The Committee uses external comparisons as only one point of reference and is mindful of the value and limitations of comparative data.

Role of Management

Our chief executive officer, Ms. Frost, makes recommendations with respect to changes in base salary for our executive officers, other than for herself. She also makes recommendations regarding the level of achievement of individual performance goals under our annual incentive compensation plan by each executive officer other than herself. Although the Committee considers the recommendations of Ms. Frost, the Committee makes all final determinations regarding executive compensation. Ms. Frost is not present when the Committee discusses or determines her compensation.

25

Risk Assessment

The Committee annually considers the risk to the Company of the design and objectives of its executive compensation plans through review of the compensation surveys provided by McLagan. The primary risk is weighting the premium growth factor too heavily in the annual and long-term incentive plans. Growing premium too rapidly could result in poor underwriting results and ultimately affect the financial strength of the Company.

The Committee recognizes that the design and objectives of the executive compensation plans are based on assumptions that may later be determined to be inaccurate which could present a risk of loss of key personnel resulting in disruption of our operations and adverse effects on our business. We have determined that our compensation policies and practices do not create risks that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company. The Committee believes the current relative weighting of the metrics in the annual and long-term incentive plans are appropriately balanced to attract, retain and motivate key employees as well as align with shareholder interests.

Overview of Executive Compensation Program

The principal components of our executive compensation program provide for a combination of fixed and variable compensation. In addition to the principal components, we also provide our executive officers with broad-based employee benefits, certain severance benefits and limited perquisites. For 2022, the principal components, which we refer to as our named executive officers’ total direct compensation, are summarized as follows:

2022 Executive Compensation Program at a Glance

Compensation Element	Characteristics
Base Salary	•Fixed cash compensation •Reviewed annually, and upon promotion or upon a change in job responsibilities •Used in determining target awards for incentive compensation
Annual Incentive Compensation	•Annual variable cash compensation based on pre-established individual qualitative leadership objectives •Target award is a percentage of base salary—for 2022, these percentages are 60% for our CEO, 35% for our former CFO, 60% for our new CFO and 30% for each of our other executive officers •Maximum payout is 150% of target award
Long-Term Equity-Based Compensation (LTIP)	•Target LTIP award is a percentage of base salary—110% for our CEO and 55% for each of our other executive officers (other than Mr. Omiridis, who did not participate in the LTIP for 2022) •100% of performance awards are payable in shares of common stock after a three-year performance period •Applicable metrics: combined ratio (60% of award) and direct premiums written (40% of award) measured against a peer group of predominately property and casualty insurance companies •Maximum payout is capped at 150% of target award

26

The table below summarizes our named executive officers’ target direct compensation approved for 2022 as well as the percentage of total target direct compensation represented by each component. As noted, over 60% of our chief executive officer’s total target direct compensation is at-risk and based on achievement of individual and Company performance objectives. The actual base salary received, the actual annual incentive compensation award earned for 2022 and the grant date value of LTIP awards, as well as certain other compensation amounts, are reflected in “Executive Compensation—Summary Compensation Table.”

	2022 Base Salary			2022 Target AIP Award			2022 Target LTIP Award			2022
Executive	$		% of Total	$		% of Total	$		% of Total	Total Target Compensation
G. Janelle Frost	$	701,000	37%	$	420,600	22%	$	771,100	41%	$	1,892,700
Anastasios G. Omiridis(1)	$	450,000	63%	$	270,000	37%	$	—	0%	$	720,000
Vincent J. Gagliano	$	331,000	54%	$	99,300	16%	$	182,050	30%	$	612,350
Andrew B. McCray	$	297,000	54%	$	89,100	16%	$	163,350	30%	$	549,450
Kathryn H. Shirley	$	305,000	54%	$	91,500	16%	$	167,750	30%	$	564,250
Neal A. Fuller(2)	$	447,000	53%	$	156,450	18%	$	245,850	29%	$	849,300

__________

1.Mr. Omiridis joined the Company as our Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer effective September 1, 2022. In connection with his appointment, the Committee approved an initial base salary of $450,000 and a 2022 target annual incentive plan award of $270,000 (60% of base salary). The amounts in the table above do not reflect his special initial award of restricted stock units with a targeted grant date value of $1,100,000.

2.Mr. Fuller relinquished the role of Chief Financial Officer in September 2022 and fully retired from the Company in December 2022.

Base Salary. Base salaries are determined on the basis of management responsibilities and level of experience, as well as internal and market comparisons. In setting base salaries for our executive officers, the Committee seeks to provide a reasonable level of fixed compensation that we believe is competitive with base salaries for comparable positions at our peer companies.

Based on the 2021 Survey, the following adjustments were made to the annual base salaries of the named executive officers in March 2022 to bring our executives’ base salaries closer to the market median.

Executive	2022 Base Salary		2021 Base Salary		Percentage Increase
G. Janelle Frost	$	701,000	$	681,000	2.9%
Anastasios G. Omiridis(1)	$	450,000	$	—	0.0%
Vincent J. Gagliano	$	331,000	$	322,000	2.8%
Andrew B. McCray	$	297,000	$	291,000	2.1%
Kathryn H. Shirley	$	305,000	$	297,000	2.7%
Neal A. Fuller	$	447,000	$	435,000	2.8%

__________

1.Mr. Omiridis joined the Company in September 2022.

Annual Incentive Compensation. The Committee believes that annual incentive compensation is an important element of the total compensation of each executive officer. Similar to the structure of the program in 2021, in 2022, the Committee implemented an annual incentive plan based on achievement of individual performance goals instead of Company-focused performance metrics.

2022 Annual Incentive Compensation. In February 2022, the Committee approved target award opportunities under our annual incentive compensation plan for each executive officer employed at the time equal to a percentage of each executive’s base salary, which percentages were consistent with those used in the 2021 program. In September 2022, in connection with his joining the Company, the Committee approved the target award opportunity for Mr. Omiridis based on market information reviewed as part of the Chief Financial Officer recruitment process.

As in 2021, the Committee believed it was important to focus each executive on key individual objectives for the year. Further, given that the payout of our long-term incentive compensation awards is

27

driven by key metrics tracking Company performance (combined ratio, direct premiums written), the Committee determined that structuring the annual incentive program around individual performance goals continues to be appropriate. In 2022, the individual performance goals established were both qualitative and quantitative for all of the executives, including Ms. Frost, to focus management’s goals on improving Company performance in a declining rate environment. The quantitative goal established was designed to support the long-term objective of policy growth. Ms. Frost also was evaluated on leadership of the senior management team. For our other executive officers, individual goals were focused on completion of individual special projects.

The following table sets forth the target award opportunity for each named executive officer for 2022.

Executive	Target Value of  Annual Incentive Opportunity		Target Annual Incentive Opportunity (% of Base Salary)
G. Janelle Frost	$	420,600	60%
Anastasios G. Omiridis (1)	$	270,000	60%
Vincent J. Gagliano	$	99,300	30%
Andrew B. McCray	$	89,100	30%
Kathryn H. Shirley	$	91,500	30%
Neal A. Fuller	$	156,450	35%

__________

1.Mr. Omiridis joined the Company in September 2022. As part of Mr. Omiridis's onboarding package, 50% of his target annual incentive opportunity for 2022 was guaranteed.

Each executive officer could earn between 0% and 150% of the target individual goals based on the level of achievement of the applicable goals. The committee evaluated each executive’s performance against his or her performance goals to determine the achievement levels under the 2022 annual incentive plan, considering the recommendations of Ms. Frost for the executives other than herself. For 2022, the quantitative goal of policy growth was not achieved, which impacted the percentage target award earned for each executive and represented half of Ms. Frost’s annual incentive goal.

The total annual incentive award payouts for our named executive officers for 2022 were as follows:

Executive	Total Award (Individual Performance)		Percent of Target Award Earned
G. Janelle Frost	$	199,995	48%
Anastasios G. Omiridis	$	337,500	125%
Vincent J. Gagliano	$	74,475	75%
Andrew B. McCray	$	41,580	47%
Kathryn H. Shirley	$	80,063	88%
Neal A. Fuller	$	195,563	125%

Long-Term Incentive Compensation. Under our current program, the Committee makes LTIP awards on an annual basis, but may adjust the performance factors, the weighting of those factors, and other aspects of the LTIP each year as it evaluates the effectiveness of the program over time. The following principles and objectives guide the Committee in implementing our LTIP each year:

•The program should be performance-based and compare the Company’s operating performance to a peer group of companies engaged in the workers’ compensation insurance industry.

•The performance period should reflect the long-term nature of the workers’ compensation claims development process.

•Increased rigor should apply in order to receive maximum payout under the performance awards, given the Company’s outstanding operating performance and the fact that the

28

Company has outperformed the workers’ compensation industry on a combined ratio basis over the past several years.

In 2022, the Committee removed the relative shareholder return modifier previously in place, given that the peer group did not consistently use the measure in their compensation programs; the peer group primarily consisted of multi-line publicly traded companies that are not representative of the performance of a mono-line workers’ compensation carrier like the Company; and the structure of the long-term incentive plan limited the effect of the total shareholder return modifier.

Under the LTIP, target awards are established annually for each named executive officer based on a percentage of the executive’s base salary. The target award value is generally delivered to each participating executive solely in the form of a performance-based award. The performance award is payable in shares of common stock, with the number of shares earned determined based on the Company achievement of certain quantitative targets measured over a three-year performance period. These performance awards are tied directly to the performance of the Company and better align executive management compensation and shareholder interests.

The compensation surveys continue to reaffirm the importance of the LTIP in making the Company’s executive compensation program competitive with peers. Awards under the LTIP for 2022 were made pursuant to our shareholder-approved equity incentive plans.

2022 Long-Term Incentive Compensation Awards. For the 2022 LTIP awards, the Committee set a target value, which was a percentage of base salary as set forth below, which percentages were consistent with those used in the 2021 program, for each participating named executive officer. The target for Ms. Frost was competitive with the market median and the target for the other executive officers was slightly below the market median for the long-term compensation component of pay as reflected in the 2021 Survey. This target value was then awarded to each executive in the form of a performance award.

Executive	Target Value of 2022 LTIP Awards (1)		Target Value as a Percentage of 2022 Base Salary
G. Janelle Frost	$	771,100	110%
Anastasios G. Omiridis (2)	$	—	0%
Vincent J. Gagliano	$	182,050	55%
Andrew B. McCray	$	163,350	55%
Kathryn H. Shirley	$	167,750	55%
Neal A. Fuller (3)	$	245,850	55%

__________

1.Following completion of the three-year performance period, the earned performance awards will be payable in shares of our common stock. These awards are further described under “Executive Compensation—Grants of Plan Based Awards.”

2.Mr. Omiridis joined the Company in September 2022 and did not participate in our 2022 LTIP, although he did receive an onboarding award of restricted stock units described further below under “- Special Award to Chief Financial Officer.”

3.Mr. Fuller's long-term incentive awards granted in 2021 and 2022 were forfeited as a result of his stepping down as Chief Financial Officer in September 2022 and subsequent retirement from the Company in December 2022.

29

Description of 2022 Performance Awards. The performance awards provide a target dollar amount that may be earned by the executive, which amount will be paid in shares of our common stock, subject to certain limited exceptions. The amount earned under the performance award will be between 0% and 150% of the award’s target value. The amount earned, if any, is dependent on the Company’s operating performance over a three-year period beginning on January 1, 2022 and ending December 31, 2024, relative to the performance of a designated peer group of insurance companies selected by the Committee. In 2021, the Committee reviewed the peer group selected for the performance awards in 2019 and confirmed that the companies selected continued to be significant competitors of the Company in the workers’ compensation markets in which it operates. The following 22 companies comprise the performance peer group for the 2022 performance awards under the LTIP:

• Accident Fund Group	• Employers Insurance Group
• ACUITY	• FCCI Mutual Insurance Company
• Alaska National Insurance Co.	• Federated Mutual Insurance Company
• Amerisure Mutual Insurance Company	• FFVA Mutual Insurance Company
• BITCO General Insurance Company	• Great West Casualty Company
• BITCO National Insurance Group	• Louisiana Workers Compensation Corp.
• Builders Insurance	• National American Insurance Company
• Builders Mutual Insurance Company	• National Interstate Corporation
• Cincinnati Financial Corporation	• Protective Insurance Corporation
• Donegal Insurance Group	• Sentry Insurance
• Eastern Insurance Holdings	• West Bend Mutual Insurance Company

Consistent with the 2021 awards, the Committee selected the following two metrics to measure the Company’s operating performance under the 2022 performance-based awards: combined ratio (“CR”), and direct premiums written (“DPW”), each determined on the basis of statutory accounting principles used by insurance companies (including the Company) in filings made with state regulatory authorities. The Committee selected these measures as they were deemed to be significant performance comparisons for insurance companies, including the Company. However, for the 2022 awards, the Committee slightly altered the weight of each metric, reducing the weight of CR by 10% and correspondingly increasing the weight of DPW by the same percentage placing an increased emphasis on the growth of direct written premiums. The Committee also eliminated the total shareholder return adjustment factor, which was used for long-term incentive awards granted prior to 2022 and is further described below.

LTIP Metrics	Weighting	Description
Combined Ratio	60%	Defined as standard industry profitability measure and is calculated as the sum of: (1) incurred losses divided by net premiums earned; (2) underwriting expenses divided by net premiums written; and (3) dividends to policyholders divided by net premiums earned.
Direct Premiums Written	40%	Defined as gross premiums written minus assumed premiums written (for mandatory pooling arrangements)

30

Calculation of Earned Amounts under the 2022 Performance Awards. Following the end of the applicable three-year performance period, the Committee will determine the percentage of the target award earned (the “Earned Value”) as follows:

Step 1: Application of Threshold Basis Points Concept to Calculation of Awards. In designing the performance-based award under the LTIP, the Committee recognized that the Company had demonstrated outstanding operating performance and consistently outperformed the workers’ compensation industry, including the peer companies listed above. As a consequence, the Committee’s award design considered this historical performance when determining the level of performance that would result in maximum payout under the performance-based awards. The Committee incorporated the concept of threshold basis points (“TBP”) into the calculation of the Earned Value. TBP is the amount by which the Company’s performance for each measure must exceed the results of the performance peer group for the payout of that measure to equal two times the target level (as noted above, the overall award is limited to 150% of the target award value). TBP is expressed in basis points (“BP”). The first step in the calculation of the Earned Value is to compare the performance of the Company over the performance period to that of the 22 companies in the peer group for the applicable performance and to determine whether the TBP level for each measure has been achieved. The TBP for each measure in the 2022 performance awards were as follows:

Metric	Form	Threshold     Points	Threshold	Target	Maximum	Limits
Statutory Combined Ratio	Relative to 22 peers	1200	1200 BP < or = to peer group	Results = peer group	1200 BP > or = to peer group = 2x target	Payout factor cannot be <-1
Statutory Growth in Direct Premiums Written	Relative to 22 peers	500	500 BP < or = to peer group	Results = peer group	500 BP > or = to peer group = 2x target	Payout factor cannot be <-1
Total sum of metric results			zero	100% of target	150% of target award

Step 2: Conversion of Earned Value to Shares of Common Stock. After determination of the Earned Value under each performance award, payment is made in shares of common stock (rounded to the nearest whole share) equal to (a) the Earned Value under the award divided by (b) the volume weighted trading price per share of common stock for the 10 trading days immediately preceding the date the value of the award is approved by the Committee (after the expiration of the three-year performance period).

Payout of the 2019-2021 Performance Awards. The 2019-2021 performance award payouts were calculated by determining the payout level based on CR and DPW metrics, and whether the payout was to be reduced if the total shareholder return ("TSR") of the Company was more than 500 basis points lower than the total shareholder return of 50% of the S&P Property Casualty Insurance Small Cap Index and 50% of the S&P Property & Casualty Insurance Mid Cap Index over the three-year period. The TSR measure could not increase payouts under the awards, but was only used to reduce the payout if the Company TSR lagged the index by more than 500 basis points and could be further reduced if the payout factor was then subject to a 1.5 times target compensation cap. For the 2019-2021 awards, the TSR measure operated as a third metric in the award design and reduced the uncapped payout factor by 37.5 basis points for every 500 basis points of under-performance in the TSR factor, subject to a maximum 25% reduction in the uncapped payout factor. As reflected in the tables below the TSR measure resulted in a reduction in the payout of the 2019-2021 performance awards.

31

The following table sets forth the weighting of performance measures established under the performance awards for the 2019 - 2021 performance period, and the results achieved. The shares of common stock earned under this award were issued in May 2022.

Metric	Weighting of Metric	Threshold BP	Peer Result	Company Result	Company/Peer BP Difference	Calculated Payout Factor (1)	Payout Factor Used
Statutory Combined Ratio	80%	1,200	91.7%	78.8%	(1,284)	2.070	2.070
Statutory Growth in Direct Premiums Written	20%	500	(1.8)%	(7.6)%	(580)	(0.161)	(0.161)
Total Shareholder Return (2)	(37.5)%	500	37.4%	19.5%	(1,785)	(2.570)	(2.570)

__________

1.For each executive, the total performance award is calculated using the weighting applied of each metric to the applicable payout factor.

2.TSR reduces the payout factor by 37.5 basis points for every 500 basis points of underperformance, capped at a negative 25% of the uncapped award before applying the 1.5 times award cap.

The following table sets forth the applicable target values, as well as the final payout, under the performance award for the 2019-2021 performance periods for each named executive officer:

Executive	Target Value of Performance Award		Bonus Factor (2)		Award Value as of May 19, 2022		Number of Common Shares (3)
G. Janelle Frost	$	731,500		1.374	$	1,004,860		20,899
Andrew G. Omiridis (1)	$	—		—	$	—		—
Vincent J. Gagliano	$	173,250		1.374	$	237,993		4,947
Andrew B. McCray	$	136,373		1.374	$	187,335		3,894
Kathryn H. Shirley	$	159,500		1.374	$	219,105		4,554
Neal A. Fuller	$	233,750		1.374	$	321,102		6,675

__________

1.Mr. Omiridis joined the Company in September 2022; therefore, he did not receive a 2019-2021 performance award.

2.The bonus factor is the sum of the weighting of each performance measure applied to the applicable payout factor. Combined ratio (2.070 x .80) + Direct Premiums Written ((0.161) x .20) – Total Shareholder Return (0.250) = 1.374.

3.Based on the volume weighted trading price per share for the 10 trading days immediately preceding the date the value of the award is approved by the Committee.

32

Current Estimates of Potential Payout Value of Outstanding Performance Awards. The following table shows the estimated potential payout of the performance-based awards granted in 2020, 2021 and 2022 as of September 30, 2022, which is the most current information available to the Company. These estimated values are presented for information purposes only, as the actual payout values will be determined following the end of the respective performance periods and will be impacted by the Company’s performance during the remainder of the performance periods.

Executive	Target Value of Performance Award		Current Performance Factor Estimate (1)		Estimated Award Value as of 9/30/2022
G. Janelle Frost
2020-2022 Performance Period	$	749,100		1.259	$	943,343
2021-2023 Performance Period	$	749,100		1.163	$	871,268
2022-2024 Performance Period	$	771,100		1.140	$	879,345
Vincent J. Gagliano
2020-2022 Performance Period	$	177,100		1.259	$	223,022
2021-2023 Performance Period	$	177,100		1.163	$	205,983
2022-2024 Performance Period	$	182,050		1.140	$	207,606
Andrew McCray
2020-2022 Performance Period	$	160,050		1.259	$	201,551
2021-2023 Performance Period	$	160,050		1.163	$	186,152
2022-2024 Performance Period	$	163,350		1.140	$	186,281
Kathryn H. Shirley
2020-2022 Performance Period	$	163,350		1.259	$	205,707
2021-2023 Performance Period	$	163,350		1.163	$	189,990
2022-2024 Performance Period	$	167,750		1.140	$	191,298
Neal A. Fuller (2)
2020-2022 Performance Period	$	239,250		1.259	$	301,288

__________

1.The performance factor estimate for each award as of September 30, 2022 is based upon (a) actual Company data from the beginning of the applicable performance period through September 30, 2022, and (b) actual peer company data from the beginning of the applicable performance period through December 31, 2021 and an estimate of peer company data for the first nine months of 2022. Because of the timing of when information becomes available regarding the peer group performance, the Committee expects that the payout value of the awards for the 2020-2022 performance period will be determined late in the second quarter of 2023. Regardless of performance, the performance factor estimate is capped at 1.5 times target compensation.

2.Mr. Fuller's long-term incentive awards granted in 2021 and 2022 were forfeited as a result of his relinquishment of the role of Chief Financial Officer in September 2022 and subsequent retirement from the Company in December 2022.

Special Award to Chief Financial Officer. In connection with Mr. Omiridis' commencement of employment in September 2022, the Committee approved a grant to Mr. Omiridis of restricted stock units with a target value of $1,100,000. This award was not part of our regular LTIP. The award vests in four annual installments of 35%, 15%, 20%, and 30%, on each of the first four anniversaries of the grant date, respectively. This award serves as a retention tool due to the extended vesting period established in the award and provides an immediate alignment with stockholder interests. The award also compensated Mr. Omiridis for compensation forfeited from his prior employer. This award is reflected below under “Executive Compensation – Grants of Plan Based Awards.”
 

33

Employee Benefits. We do not provide our executives or other employees with defined benefit pensions, supplemental retirement benefits, post-retirement payments or deferred compensation programs. We do provide a 401(k) defined contribution plan that is available to all employees. We match 50% of employee contributions up to 6% of compensation for participating employees, subject to limitations under applicable law. Our executives and other employees are fully vested in Company contributions under this plan after five years. We also provide health, life and other insurance benefits to our executives on the same basis as our other full-time employees.

Severance and Change-in-Control Benefits. We have employment agreements with each of our executive officers. These employment agreements provide each executive officer with severance compensation consisting of cash payments paid in monthly installments and continued health benefits for a period of 12 months (18 months for our chief executive officer), in the event that an executive’s employment is terminated by us without cause or by the executive under certain qualifying circumstances. The cash severance payment for the covered executives (other than our chief executive officer) is an amount equal to the officer’s then current annual base salary plus the average of the three most recent annual incentive bonuses received by the executive. For our chief executive officer, the cash severance payment is one and one-half times the amount described in the preceding sentence. These employment agreements also provide that the terminated executive will not engage in activities that are competitive with our business for 12 months (18 months for our chief executive officer). For additional information regarding the employment agreements with our executives, see “Executive Compensation – Employment Agreements” below.

Performance-based LTIP awards partially vest upon death, disability, retirement or a termination of employment without cause or for good reason following a change in control of the Company. These awards do not vest solely upon a change in control and with respect to the performance awards, the partial vesting remains conditioned upon the achievement of the performance measures. To qualify for partial vesting upon retirement, an executive officer must be at least age 60, have 10 or more years of service with the Company and not have accepted a substantial employment or consulting arrangement with another company engaged in the workers’ compensation insurance industry.

The Committee believes that these benefits are necessary and appropriate in order to attract and retain qualified executive officers as these benefits are generally made available by other companies. In addition, the Committee recognizes that it may be difficult for our executive officers to find comparable employment in a short period of time. Therefore, these benefits, particularly the severance payments, address a valid concern, making an executive position with our Company more attractive. These issues are particularly significant to us, given that our corporate headquarters is not located in a major metropolitan area and it is unlikely that our executives could secure comparable employment without relocating to another city. The Company does not provide excise tax gross-ups under any change in control arrangement.

In connection with Mr. Fuller's departure from the Company in December 2022, the Board determined that he would remain eligible to receive a payout with respect to his 2020-2022 performance-based LTIP award based on actual performance for the full performance period. Mr Fuller forfeited all other unvested equity awards that he held as of his separation date. Additionally, the Board determined Mr. Fuller would remain eligible to receive the payout with respect to his 2022 annual incentive plan award.

Executive Perquisites. We also provide a limited number of perquisites that the Committee believes enhance our ability to attract and retain qualified executives. These perquisites include car allowances, disability insurance and reimbursement for annual medical examinations. Our executive officers are also permitted to accrue up to 300 hours of vacation, a limit slightly higher than the 240 hour maximum available to employees with more than 15 years of service. The Committee believes that this policy is appropriate given that the management responsibilities of our executive officers often do not permit them the flexibility to use their vacation time on an annual basis. During 2022, the Company also provided a cash payment to Mr. Omiridis for expenses associated with his move to our corporate headquarters. The Company does not provide tax gross-ups on these perquisites or additional benefits. For additional information regarding perquisites provided to our executives, see “Executive Compensation—Summary Compensation Table – All Other Compensation.”

34

Compensation-Related Policies

Clawback Policy. The Committee has adopted a formal policy regarding recovery of incentive awards for fiscal years for which the Company is required to file a restatement of its financial statements with either the SEC or any state insurance authority. This policy is incorporated in both the annual and long-term incentive compensation award agreements with each of the Company’s executive officers, and permits the Committee to seek recovery of incentive awards granted after adoption of the policy if there is a restatement of the Company’s financial statements. Under this policy, the Committee will consider any financial statement restatement in exercising its discretion in connection with determining the payout of incentive and other compensation awards for executives in the periods following such a financial statement restatement. We are currently working to update our clawback policy to incorporate the additional requirements reflected in the new Nasdaq listing standards, which were mandated by the Dodd Frank Act and are expected to become effective later in 2023.

Stock Ownership Guidelines. The Committee has approved stock ownership guidelines for our executive officers. The target ownership for our chief executive officer is a dollar amount equal to three times her average base salary and annual incentive bonus for the three immediately preceding calendar years. The target ownership for each of our other executive officers is a dollar amount equal to two times their average base salary for the three immediately preceding calendar years (or, if less, all complete calendar years employed by the Company). All forms of Company outstanding equity, whether vested or unvested, including common stock, restricted stock and restricted stock units, are counted for purposes of determining compliance with the ownership guidelines. The value of outstanding performance awards is not counted for purposes of the guidelines. In determining whether an executive meets the applicable guideline, the value of shares of common stock, including restricted stock, restricted stock units and shares purchased by executives in the open market, is based on the closing price of our common stock on the last trading day of the most recent calendar year.

Until an executive officer meets the ownership target provided under the guidelines, he or she is required to retain all shares received under the Company’s compensation plans, except for shares used to satisfy tax obligations. After an executive meets the applicable guideline, he or she is required to retain 20% of any shares obtained as the result vesting of a restricted stock award or payout of an LTIP performance award, net of shares sold to satisfy tax obligations.

The following table sets forth for each current executive officer the applicable stock ownership guideline and equity ownership as of December 31, 2022, measured in dollars, using the guideline methodology described above. As noted in the table, each of our current executive officers exceeds his or her ownership guideline except Mr. McCray, who joined the Company in May 2019.

Executive	Ownership		Stock Ownership Guideline
G. Janelle Frost	$	4,201,930	$	2,823,222
Anastasios G. Omiridis	$	1,186,267	$	900,000
Vincent J. Gagliano	$	1,024,381	$	650,000
Andrew B. McCray	$	486,439	$	586,000
Kathryn H. Shirley	$	719,265	$	599,333

Impact of Prior Awards on Future Grants. The Committee does not have a specific policy addressing the cumulative value of prior equity awards in making future awards. However, our Committee intends to continue to make appropriate executive compensation decisions annually, so that our executives receive a total compensation package that is both competitive and has a significant portion of compensation at risk. The Committee is mindful that payment under long-term performance awards is tied to the Company meeting or exceeding quantitative performance objectives and the increase in the value of our common stock (for restricted stock awards), with unvested awards also conditioned on continued employment. As a result, the Committee believes, as a general matter, that positive results with respect to prior incentive awards should not negatively impact future compensation decisions.

35

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT

The Compensation Committee has reviewed and discussed with management the Compensation Discussion and Analysis. Based on that review and discussion, the Compensation Committee recommended to the Board of Directors of the Company that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2022 and this proxy statement.

This report is submitted by the members of the Compensation Committee of the Board named below, who received, discussed with management and recommended that this Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in the Company’s Annual Report.

Members of the Compensation Committee

Michael J. Brown (Chair) Philip A. Garcia Billy B. Greer Jared A. Morris Sean M. Traynor

36

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

2022 Summary Compensation Table

The following table provides information regarding the compensation of our chief executive officer, each person who served as our chief financial officer during 2022, and our three other most highly compensated executive officers who were serving in such capacity as of December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020

Name and Principal Position	Year	Salary		Stock Awards (1)		Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation (2)		All Other Compensation (3)		Total
G. Janelle Frost	2022	$	697,667	$	602,572	$	199,995	$	25,282	$	1,525,515
President and Chief Executive	2021		681,000		1,029,041		194,085		23,715		1,927,841
Officer	2020		678,333		1,098,937		145,537		19,322		1,942,129
Anastasios G. Omiridis (4)	2022		150,000		1,100,000		337,500		78,493		1,665,993
Executive Vice President, Chief	2021		—		—		—		—		—
Financial Officer	2020		—		—		—		—		—
Vincent J. Gagliano	2022		329,500		142,262		74,475		33,628		579,865
Executive Vice President and	2021		322,000		243,283		82,110		30,951		678,344
Chief Risk Officer	2020		320,833		259,807		78,130		25,016		683,786
Andrew B. McCray	2022		296,000		127,649		41,580		23,398		488,627
Executive Vice President and Chief	2021		291,000		219,861		63,293		21,996		596,150
Underwriting Officer	2020		290,000		234,795		62,103		15,159		602,057
Kathryn H. Shirley	2022		303,667		131,087		80,063		22,604		537,421
Executive Vice President, Chief	2021		297,000		224,394		75,735		22,685		619,814
Administrative Officer and Secretary	2020		295,833		239,636		74,005		18,633		628,107
Neal A. Fuller (5)	2022		411,188		192,118		195,563		18,652		817,521
Former Executive Vice President	2021		435,000		328,658		100,420		22,534		886,612
And Chief Financial Officer	2020		433,333		350,982		89,706		18,044		892,065

__________

1.Long-term incentive compensation awards granted in 2022 consisted of performance-based awards (or, for Mr. Omiridis, a time-based restricted stock unit award). Amounts in this column represent the grant date fair value of these awards calculated in accordance with the Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification Topic 718 (“Topic 718”). The amounts with respect to performance-based awards reflect the probable payout percentage for the awards calculated in accordance with Topic 718. The grant date fair value is an estimate made for financial accounting purposes. Actual payouts will be determined at the end of the three-year performance period based on actual results for both the Company and the peer group. There is no minimum payout under the performance-based awards. Assuming the performance-based awards would be paid out at the target level of 100%, the grant date fair value of these awards would be as follows: Ms. Frost, $771,100; Mr. Fuller, $245,850; Mr. Gagliano, $182,050, Mr. McCray, $163,350 and Ms. Shirley, $167,750. Assuming the performance-based awards would be paid out at the maximum payout level of 150%, the grant date fair value of these awards would be as follows: Ms. Frost, $1,156,650; Mr. Fuller, $368,775; Mr. Gagliano, $273,075, Mr. McCray, $245,025 and Ms. Shirley $251,625. See “2022 Grants of Plan-Based Awards.”

Mr. Fuller's long-term incentive awards granted in 2021 and 2022 were forfeited when he retired from the Company in December 2022.

Mr. Omiridis received a restricted stock unit award which vests ratably over four years.

Pursuant to SEC rules, the amounts shown in this column exclude the impact of estimated forfeitures related to service-based vesting conditions. For additional information regarding the awards granted in 2022, see “Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Long-Term Incentive Compensation.”

2.Amounts in this column represent the amounts paid to our executive officers under our performance-based annual incentive compensation program, including the guaranteed portion of Mr. Omiridis' annual incentive pursuant to his onboarding package. See “Grants of Plan-Based Awards” below.

37

3.For 2022, includes compensation as described under “All Other Compensation” below.

4.Mr. Omiridis joined the Company in September 2022.

5.Mr. Fuller relinquished the role of Chief Financial Officer in September 2022 and fully retired from the Company in December 2022.

All Other Compensation

The following table provides information regarding each component of compensation included in the All Other Compensation column for 2022 in the Summary Compensation Table above.

	Car Allowance		Company 401(k) Contributions		Medical Examinations		Disability Insurance Premiums		Life Insurance premiums		Other (2)		Total
G. Janelle Frost	$	9,980	$	9,150	$	4,355	$	1,743	$	54	$	—	$	25,282
Anastasios G. Omiridis (1)		3,439		—		—		—		54		75,000		78,493
Vincent J. Gagliano		11,401		9,150		4,755		8,268		54		—		33,628
Andrew B. McCray		10,468		9,150		3,726		—		54		—		23,398
Kathryn H. Shirley		9,980		9,150		3,420		—		54		—		22,604
Neal A. Fuller (3)		9,448		9,150		—		—		54		—		18,652

__________

1.Mr. Omiridis joined the Company in September 2022.

2.Represents a cash payment for expenses associated with Mr. Omiridis's move to our corporate headquarters.

3.Mr. Fuller relinquished the role of Chief Financial Officer in September 2022 and fully retired from the Company in December 2022.

2022 Grants of Plan-Based Awards

In 2022, each of our named executive officers, other than Mr. Omiridis, received performance-based awards under our long-term incentive compensation program and Mr. Omiridis received a grant of time-based restricted stock units. Additionally, in 2022 each of our executive officers received annual incentive compensation awards. See “Compensation Discussion and Analysis—2022 Compensation.” The following table contains information regarding grants of plan-based awards to our named executive officers in the year ended December 31, 2022. In this table, annual incentive compensation awards are abbreviated as “AIC,” long-term performance-based incentive awards are abbreviated as “LTIP," and time-based restricted stock units are abbreviated as "RSU".

				Estimated Possible Payouts Under Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards (3)						Estimated Future Payouts Under Equity Incentive Plan Awards (4)						All Other Stock Awards:
Name	Type	Board or Committee Approval Date (1)	Grant Date (2)	Threshold ($)		Target ($)		Maximum ($)		Threshold ($)		Target ($)		Maximum ($)		Number of Shares of Stock or Units (#)		Grant Date Fair Value of Stock and Option Awards ($) (5)
G. Janelle Frost	AIC	02/17/2022	03/01/2022	$	—	$	420,600	$	630,900	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—
	LTIP	02/17/2022	03/01/2022		—		—		—		—		771,100		1,156,650		—		602,572
Anastasios G. Omiridis	AIC	02/17/2022	03/01/2022		—		270,000		405,000		—		—		—		—		—
	RSU	08/15/2022	09/01/2022		—		—		—		—		—		—		22,826		1,100,000
Vincent J. Gagliano	AIC	02/17/2022	03/01/2022		—		99,300		148,950		—		—		—		—		—
	LTIP	02/17/2022	03/01/2022		—		—		—		—		182,050		273,075		—		142,262
Andrew B. McCray	AIC	02/17/2022	03/01/2022		—		89,100		133,650		—		—		—		—		—
	LTIP	02/17/2022	03/01/2022		—		—		—		—		163,350		245,025		—		127,649
Kathryn H. Shirley	AIC	02/17/2022	03/01/2022		—		91,500		137,250		—		—		—		—		—
	LTIP	02/17/2022	03/01/2022		—		—		—		—		167,750		251,625		—		131,087
Neal A. Fuller	AIC	02/17/2022	03/01/2022		—		156,450		234,675		—		—		—		—		—
	LTIP	02/17/2022	03/01/2022		—		—		—		—		245,850		368,775		—		192,118

__________

1.Each of the awards described in this table was approved by the Compensation Committee.

2.The grant date for each award is the date on which the respective award agreement was executed.

3.Reflects the target and maximum dollar amounts payable under our annual incentive plan. The actual payment will be determined by the performance criteria described under “Compensation Discussion and Analysis – 2022 Annual Incentive Compensation.”

4.Reflects the target and maximum dollar amounts payable under our long-term performance-based awards. Actual payments under each performance-based award will be made in shares of common stock (rounded to the nearest whole share) equal to (a) the amount earned under the award divided

38

by (b) the volume weighted trading price per share of common stock for the 10 trading days immediately preceding the date the value of the award is approved by our Compensation Committee. The actual payout will be determined by the performance criteria described under “Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Long-Term Incentive Compensation.”

5.Represents the grant date fair value of the awards computed in accordance with Topic 718. With respect to long-term performance-based awards, amounts reflect the probable payout percentage for the awards calculated in accordance with Topic 718. The grant date fair value is an estimate made for financial accounting purposes. Payouts for the long-term performance-based awards will be determined at the end of the three-year performance period based on actual results for both the Company and the peer group.

Outstanding Equity Awards at 2022 Fiscal Year-End

The following table contains information regarding outstanding equity awards held by our named executive officers as of December 31, 2022. None of the named executive officers held stock options as of December 31, 2022.

	Stock Awards
Name	Number of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested (#) (1)		Market Value of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested ($) (2)		Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Market or Payout Value of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested (3)
G. Janelle Frost
2020-2022 LTIP performance award		—		—	$	1,123,650
2021-2023 LTIP performance award		—		—		1,123,650
2022-2024 LTIP performance award		—		—		1,156,650
Anastasios G. Omiridis (4)
Restricted Stock Unit Grant		22,826		1,186,267		—
Vincent J. Gagliano
2020-2022 LTIP performance award		—		—		265,650
2021-2023 LTIP performance award		—		—		265,650
2022-2024 LTIP performance award		—		—		273,075
Andrew B. McCray
Restricted Share Grant		4,950		257,252
2020-2022 LTIP performance award		—		—		240,075
2021-2023 LTIP performance award		—		—		240,075
2022-2024 LTIP performance award		—		—		245,025
Kathryn H. Shirley
2020-2022 LTIP performance award		—		—		245,025
2021-2023 LTIP performance award		—		—		245,025
2022-2024 LTIP performance award		—		—		251,625
Neal A. Fuller (5)
2020-2022 LTIP performance award		—		—		358,875

__________

1.With respect to Mr. McCray, 2,250 shares of restricted stock will vest on May 20, 2023; and 2,700 shares of restricted stock will vest on May 20, 2024. With respect to Mr. Omiridis, 7,989 restricted stock units will vest on September 1, 2023; 3,424 restricted stock units will vest on September 1, 2024; 4,565 restricted stock units will vest on September 1, 2025; and 6,848 restricted stock units will vest on September 1, 2026.

39

2.Represents the value of restricted stock units and shares of restricted stock based on a price of $51.97, the closing price of our common stock on December 30, 2022.

3.Represents the value of outstanding performance-based awards assuming that the maximum level of performance is achieved. Payments under each performance-based award will be made in shares of common stock (rounded to the nearest whole share) equal to (a) the amount earned under the award divided by (b) the volume weighted trading price per share of common stock for the 10 trading days immediately preceding the date the value of the award is approved by our Compensation Committee. The actual payout will be determined by the performance criteria described under “Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Long-Term Incentive Compensation.”

The 2020-2022 LTIP performance periods began on January 1, 2020 and ended December 31, 2022.

the 2021-2023 LTIP performance period began on January 1, 2021 and ends on December 31, 2023.

The 2022-2024 LTIP performance period began on January 1, 2022 and ends on December 31, 2024.

4.Mr. Omiridis joined the Company in September 2022.

5.Mr. Fuller relinquished the role of Chief Financial Officer in September 2022 and fully retired from the Company in December 2022. In connection with his separation from the Company, he forfeited his unvested equity compensation awards, other than his performance-based award for the 2020-2022 performance period.

Option Exercises and Stock Vested

The Company has no outstanding options and as a result, none of our named executive officers exercised stock options during the year ended December 31, 2022. The following table provides information, for each of our named executive officers, on the number of shares of common stock resulting from the vesting of shares of restricted stock, the payout of the 2019 – 2021 performance awards and the value realized before payment of any applicable withholding tax during 2022.

	Stock Awards
Name	Number of Shares Acquired on Vesting (#) (1)	Value Realized on Vesting ($) (2)
G. Janelle Frost	20,889	$	1,004,860
Anastasios Omiridis (3)	—	$	—
Vincent J. Gagliano	4,947	$	237,993
Andrew B. McCray	3,894	$	187,335
Kathryn H. Shirley	4,554	$	219,105
Neal A. Fuller	6,675	$	321,102

__________

1.Represents the payout of performance-based awards vested for the 2019 – 2021 performance period. With respect to Mr. McCray, the amount also includes vested time-based restricted stock.

2.Value determined on vest date for time-based restricted stock. With respect to performance awards, value is based on the volume weighted trading price per share for the 10 trading days immediately preceding the date the value of the award is approved by the Committee.

3.Mr. Omiridis joined the Company in September 2022.

Employment Agreements

We have employment agreements with each continuing named executive officer. The term of each agreement is automatically extended for an additional consecutive one-year period at expiration unless either party provides notice not to extend the term at least 30 days prior to the applicable expiration date.

The agreements provide that each named executive officer is entitled to an annual base salary (subject to periodic salary increases) and also eligible to participate in the Company’s incentive compensation plans and receive employee benefits provided to other executive officers of the Company.

40

Under the agreements with each of our executive officers, if we terminate their employment without cause, the terminated executive officer will be entitled to receive severance compensation consisting of cash paid in installments, and continued health benefits. The cash severance payment for the covered executives is paid monthly for a period of 12 months (18 months for Ms. Frost), in an amount equal to the officer’s then current annual base salary plus the average annual incentive award received by the executive in the prior three years. The calculation of severance benefits under the employment agreement with each of our executive officers excludes any long-term incentive based compensation.

An executive officer is deemed to have been terminated without cause if:

•we elect not to extend the terms of the employment agreement or we terminate the executive for any reason other than:

•the conviction, guilty plea or plea of no contest to any felony, or to any crime of moral turpitude;

•the willful misconduct of the executive officer, or the willful or continued failure by the executive officer (except as a result of disability or illness) to substantially perform his/her duties to the Company, in either case which has a material adverse effect on Company; or

•the willful fraud or material dishonesty of the executive officer in connection with his performance of duties to the Company;

•the executive terminates employment with us following:

•a material reduction in authority, duties or responsibility;

•a material reduction in base salary;

•a material reduction in the executive’s ability to earn an annual bonus that results in a material reduction in the total annual compensation the executive may earn;

•a termination of employee benefits, unless the termination is applicable to all senior executives or is required under any applicable plan or law;

•relocation of the executive’s principal place of work to a location more than 35 miles from the executive’s current principal place of work; or

•a material breach of the employment agreement by us.

Each of our executive officers has agreed not to compete with us or solicit our employees, agents or policyholders without our prior written consent while they are employed by us. If one of our executive officers is terminated by us without cause, the prohibition on engaging in competitive activities or soliciting our employees, agents or policyholders extends for a period of 12 months (18 months for Ms. Frost) after the date of termination. If an executive officer is terminated by us for cause, the executive officer terminates employment other than for one of the reasons specified above, or if an executive officer elects not to renew the term of the employment agreement, we have the option to extend the restriction on engaging in competitive or solicitation activities for a period of 12 months (18 months for Ms. Frost) after the date of termination or non-renewal by (a) delivering a written notice to the executive officer within 180 days after termination or non-renewal and (b) paying the executive officer the severance compensation provided under the employment agreement.

Equity Incentive Plan

We have outstanding equity-based awards under two shareholder–approved incentive plans, the AMERISAFE, Inc. 2012 Equity and Incentive Compensation Plan (the “2012 Incentive Plan”) and the AMERISAFE, Inc. 2022 Equity and Incentive Compensation Plan (the “2022 Incentive Plan,” and, together with the 2012 Incentive Plan, the “Incentive Plans”).

The 2022 Incentive Plan permits awards in the form of option rights, appreciation rights, restricted shares, restricted stock units, cash incentive awards, performance shares and units. Options granted under the Incentive Plan are required to have an exercise price of not less than the fair market value of our common stock on the grant date. The maximum number of shares of our common stock that may be issued pursuant to equity awards under the 2022 Incentive Plan is 500,000 shares, subject to the 2022

41

Incentive Plan's share counting rules. As of April 17, 2023, 466,012 shares of our common stock were available for further issuance under the 2022 Incentive Plan. No further grants may be made under the 2012 Incentive Plan. See “Equity Compensation Plan Information" for further information regarding share usage under the Incentive Plans as of December 31, 2022. It is our Company’s policy to award grants under our Incentive Plan only during periods in which the Company’s executives and other employees are normally permitted to buy and sell the Company’s securities under our Company’s insider trading policy.

Agreements evidencing awards may provide for vesting if a grantee’s employment is terminated by the Company without cause (as defined in the award agreement) or by the grantee for good reason (as defined in the award agreement) following a change in control of our Company. A change in control will be deemed to have occurred under the Incentive Plans if:

•a person or group acquires 35% or more of the Company’s then outstanding voting securities, subject to certain exceptions;

•individuals who constitute the Board as of the effective date of the applicable Incentive Plan cease to constitute at least a majority of the Board, unless their replacements are approved as described in the applicable Incentive Plan;

•there is a consummation of reorganization, a merger, or consolidation, a sale or disposition of substantially all of our assets, or similar corporate transaction that results in an a substantial change in ownership or leadership of the Company, as described in the Incentive Plan; or

•the Company’s shareholders approve a complete liquidation or dissolution of the Company, subject to certain exceptions.

Under the award agreements governing our equity compensation awards, grantees of time-based restricted stock, restricted stock units and performance-based awards are entitled to accelerated vesting if the grantee’s employment is terminated in connection with a change in control or due to death or disability (or for certain performance-based awards only, due to retirement), in each case as defined in the award agreement, as follows:

Date of Termination	Applicable Percentage
Within six months of the grant date or commencement of performance period		0.0	%
After six months following the grant date but within 18 months following the grant    date or commencement of performance period		33.3	%
After 18 months following the grant date but within 30 months following the grant    date or commencement of performance period		66.6	%
After 30 months following the grant date or commencement of performance period		100.0	%

In any event, a grantee of a performance-based award will only receive payment for an award after the performance period has ended and the awards are determined and paid to all other grantees.

Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control

The table below quantifies potential compensation that would have become payable to each of our named executive officers (other than Mr. Fuller, who departed the Company during 2022) under employment agreements, annual and long-term incentive compensation award agreements and Company plans and policies (as in effect on December 30, 2022) if their employment had terminated on December 30, 2022, given the executive officer’s base salary on that date and the closing price of our common stock on December 30, 2022. In addition, the table quantifies the compensation that would have become payable to each of our named executive officers (other than Mr. Fuller) assuming that a change in control of the Company had occurred on December 30, 2022, and determining any amounts that would be payable under the employment agreements in effect as of that date. For additional information regarding (a) the circumstances in which our named executive officers would be entitled to severance compensation, see “Executive Compensation—Employment Agreements” and (b) the acceleration of vesting of equity awards, see “Executive Compensation—Equity Incentive Plans.”

42

Due to the factors that may affect the amount of any benefits provided upon the events described below, any actual amounts paid or payable may be different than those shown in this table. Factors that could affect these amounts include the date the termination event occurs, the base salary of an executive on the date of termination of employment and the price of our common stock when the event occurs.

	Cash Severance Payments (1)		Healthcare Premiums (2)		Acceleration of Equity Awards (3)		Total
G. Janelle Frost
Voluntary Termination	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—
Termination with Cause		—		—		—		—
Termination without Cause or for Good Reason    (prior to a Change in Control)		1,445,749		44,072		1,502,880		2,992,701
Termination without Cause or for Good Reason    (following a Change in Control)		1,445,749		44,072		1,502,880		2,992,701
Death or Disability		—		—		1,502,880		1,502,880
Retirement		—		—		1,502,880		1,502,880
Change in Control		—		—		—		—
Anastasios G. Omiridis
Voluntary Termination		—		—		—		—
Termination with Cause		—		—		—		—
Termination without Cause or for Good Reason    (prior to a Change in Control)		450,000		—		—		450,000
Termination without Cause or for Good Reason    (following a Change in Control)		450,000		—		—		450,000
Death or Disability		—		—		—		—
Retirement		—		—		—		—
Change in Control		—		—		—
Vincent J. Gagliano
Voluntary Termination		—		—		—		—
Termination with Cause		—		—		—		—
Termination without Cause or for Good Reason    (prior to a Change in Control)		423,132		21,946		355,231		800,310
Termination without Cause or for Good Reason    (following a Change in Control)		423,132		21,946		355,231		800,310
Death or Disability		—		—		355,231		355,231
Retirement		—		—		355,231		355,231
Change in Control		—		—		—		—
Andrew B. McCray
Voluntary Termination		—		—		—		—
Termination with Cause		—		—		—		—
Termination without Cause or for Good Reason    (prior to a Change in Control)		358,124		16,494		320,645		695,263
Termination without Cause or for Good Reason    (following a Change in Control)		358,124		16,494		320,645		695,263
Death or Disability		—		—		320,645		320,645
Retirement		—		—		320,645		320,645
Change in Control		—		—		—
Kathryn H. Shirley
Voluntary Termination		—		—		—		—
Termination with Cause		—		—		—		—
Termination without Cause or for Good Reason    (prior to a Change in Control)		400,003		790		327,597		728,389
Termination without Cause or for Good Reason    (following a Change in Control)		400,003		790		327,597		728,389
Death or Disability		—		—		327,597		327,597
Retirement		—		—		327,597		327,597
Change in Control		—		—		—		—

__________

1.Cash severance is payable in installments over 12 months (18 months for Ms. Frost).

2.Represents COBRA health insurance premiums payable on behalf of the executives following termination of employment for a period of 12 months (18 months for Ms. Frost).

3.Performance-based awards granted under the 2012 Incentive Plan will partially vest upon death or disability, retirement and will also partially vest if the recipient’s employment is terminated without cause or for good reason following a change in control. See “Executive Compensation—Equity Incentive Plan.” The dollar amounts in this column includes the value of restricted stock awards that would vest on December 30, 2022 at $51.97 per share, the closing price of our common stock on December 31, 2022. With respect to the performance-based awards, the amounts in this column reflect partial vesting of the awards assuming target level performance. A grantee of a performance-based award will receive any payment under the award after the performance period has ended and the amount of the award is determined.

In connection with Mr. Fuller's relinquishment of the role of Chief Financial Officer in September of 2022 and subsequent retirement from the Company in December 2022, the Board determined that he would remain eligible to receive a payout with respect to his 2020-2022 performance-based LTIP award

43

(with an estimated value of $239,250, assuming target performance) and his 2022 annual incentive award (valued at $195,563) in each case based on actual performance for the full performance period. Mr. Fuller forfeited all other unvested equity awards that he held as of his separation date.

CEO Pay Ratio

For 2022, the ratio of the annual total compensation of Ms. Frost, our President and Chief Executive Officer (“CEO Compensation”), to the median of the annual total compensation of all of our employees and those of our consolidated subsidiaries other than Ms. Frost (“Median Annual Compensation”) was 23 to 1. We refer to the employee who received the Median Annual Compensation as the “Median Employee.”

This ratio is a reasonable estimate calculated in a manner consistent with Item 402(u) of Regulation S-K using the data and assumptions summarized below. The assumptions we used are specific to our company and our employee population. As a result, our pay ratio may not be comparable to the pay ratios of other companies.

CEO Compensation. CEO Compensation for 2022 was $1,525,516. We calculated the CEO Compensation by totaling all applicable elements of compensation reported in the Summary Compensation Table.

Median Annual Compensation. Median Annual Compensation for 2022 was $65,000. We calculated the Median Annual Compensation by totaling all applicable elements of compensation for our Median Employee in accordance with Item 402(c)(2)(x) of Regulation S-K. We did not make any cost-of-living adjustments in identifying the Median Employee.

Determination Date and Measurement Period. We identified our Median Employee as of December 31, 2022 (the “Determination Date”). We used the 12-month period ended December 31, 2022 as the compensation measurement period.

Employee Pool Used to Identify Median Employee. As of the Determination Date, we had 366 employees. This number includes all full-time, part-time, seasonal and temporary employees of AMERISAFE and its subsidiaries. This number does not include any independent contractors or “leased” workers.

Compensation Used to Identify Median Employee. We used 2022 taxable wages as reflected in our payroll records and as reported to the Internal Revenue Service on Form W-2 to identify our Median Employee. W-2 taxable wages include, among other things, salary, wages, bonuses and stock compensation.

Adjustments to Compensation. A portion of our permanent employee workforce (full-time and part-time) worked for less than the full year due to, among other things, commencing employment after the beginning of the year or taking an unpaid leave of absence. In determining our Median Employee, we annualized the total compensation for those individuals (but not for individuals in temporary or seasonal positions).

Pay Versus Performance

As required by pay versus performance rules adopted by the SEC on August 25, 2022 ("PVP Rules") and in effect for the first time for this proxy statement, the below Pay Versus Performance table ("PVP Table") provides information about compensation for this proxy statement's named executive officers ("NEOs"), as well as NEOs from our 2020 and 2021 proxy statements (each of 2020, 2021, 2022, a "Covered Year"). The PVP Table also provides information about the results for certain financial performance measures during those same Covered Years. In reviewing this information, there are a few important things to consider:

•The information in columns (b) and (d) comes directly from this and prior years' Summary Compensation Tables, without adjustment;

44

•As required by the PVP Rules, we describe the information in columns (c) and (e) as "compensation actually paid" (or "CAP") to the applicable NEOs, but these CAP amounts do not entirely reflect compensation that our NEOs actually earned for their service in the Covered Years. Instead, CAP reflects a combination of realized pay (primarily for cash amounts) and realizable or accrued pay (primarily for equity awards); and

•As required by the PVP Rules, we provide information about our total shareholders return ("TSR") results, S&P 600 Property & Casualty Insurance Index ("PVP Peer Group") TSR results and U.S. GAAP net income results (the "External Measures") during the Covered Years in the PVP Table, but we did not actually base any compensation decisions for the NEOs on, or link any NEO pay to, these particular External Measures because the External Measures were not metrics used in our incentive plans during the Covered Years.

Due to the use of Combined Ratio performance measure in our long-term incentive program, the Company has determined that, pursuant to the PVP Rules, Combined Ratio should be designated as the "Company-Selected Measure" because we believe it is the most important financial measure that we used to link 2022 named executive officer pay to our performance.

									Value of Initial Fixed $100 Investment Based On:
Year (a)	Summary Compensation Total for PEO(1) (b)		Compensation Actually Paid to PEO(2)  (c)		Average Summary Compensation Table Total for Non-PEO Named Executive Officers (d)		Average Compensation Actually Paid to Non-PEO Named Executive Officers(2) (e)		Total Share-holder Return(3) (f)		Peer Group Total Shareholder Return(4) (g)		Net Income(5) (h)	Combined Ratio(6) (i)
2022	$	1,525,516	$	2,185,161	$	817,885	$	1,472,921	$	125.65	$	127.00	55.6M	83.6%
2021		1,927,841		1,064,627		695,230		488,309		125.00		151.74	65.8M	85.7%
2020		1,942,129		2,086,210		701,504		671,375		159.46		181.70	86.6M	76.3%

__________

1.G. Janelle Frost was our principal executive officer (“PEO”) for the full year for each of 2022, 2021 and 2020. For 2022, our non-PEO named executive officers were Neal A. Fuller (CFO), Anastasios Omiridis (CFO), Vincent J. Gagliano, Andrew B. McCray and Kathryn H. Shirley. For 2021 and 2020, our non-PEO named executive officers were Neal A. Fuller, Vincent J. Gagliano, Andrew B. McCray and Kathryn H. Shirley.

2.For each “Covered Year”, in determining both the compensation “actually paid” to our PEO and the average compensation “actually paid” to our non-PEO named executive officers for purposes of this “PVP Table”, we deducted from or added back to the total amounts of compensation reported in column (b) or column (d) for such Covered Year the amounts set forth in the following table. Certain of the values in this table are calculated based on the probable outcome of performance-based awards as of various dates. For purposes of performance-based awards outstanding as of December 31, 2022, probable outcome as of 2022 fiscal year-end has been calculated using the most recently available data as of the date of this filing, which is based on results through September 30, 2022.

45

Item and Value Added (Deducted)	2022			2021			2020
For G. Janelle Frost:
- change in actuarial present value of pension benefits	NA			NA			NA
+ service cost of pension benefits	NA			NA			NA
+ prior service cost of pension benefits	NA			NA			NA
- SCT “Stock Awards” column value	$	(602,572	)	$	(1,029,041	)	$	(1,098,937	)
- SCT “Option Awards” column value	$	—		$	—		$	—
+ year-end fair value of outstanding equity awards granted in Covered Year	$	879,345		$	519,673		$	1,111,063
+/- change in fair value of outstanding equity awards granted in prior years[4]	$	351,595		$	(369,690	)	$	98,290
+ vesting date fair value of equity awards granted and vested in Covered Year	$	—		$	—		$	—
+/- change in fair value of prior-year equity awards vested in Covered Year	$	31,277		$	15,844		$	30,773
- prior year-end fair value of prior-year equity awards forfeited in Covered Year	$	—		$	—		$	—
+ includable dividends/earnings on equity awards during Covered Year	$	—		$	—		$	2,893
For Non-PEO Named Executive Officers (Average):
- change in actuarial present value of pension benefits	$	—		$	—		$	—
+ service cost of pension benefits	$	—		$	—		$	—
+ prior service cost of pension benefits	$	—		$	—		$	—
- SCT “Stock Awards” column value	$	(338,623	)	$	(254,049	)	$	(271,305	)
- SCT “Option Awards” column value	$	—		$	—		$	—
+ year-end fair value of outstanding equity awards granted in Covered Year	$	442,865		$	128,297		$	274,299
+/- change in fair value of outstanding equity awards granted in prior years	$	10,041		$	(115,902	)	$	(59,274	)
+ vesting date fair value of equity awards granted and vested in Covered Year	$	—		$	—		$	—
+/- change in fair value of prior-year equity awards vested in Covered Year	$	7,513		$	(487	)	$	7,099
- prior year-end fair value of prior-year equity awards forfeited in Covered Year	$	467,263		$	—		$	—
+ includable dividends/earnings on equity awards during Covered Year	$	65,976		$	35,221		$	19,052

3.For each Covered Year, our TSR was calculated as the yearly percentage change in our cumulative total shareholder return on our common stock, par value $0.01 per share, measured as the quotient of (a) the sum of (i) the cumulative amount of dividends for a period beginning with our closing price on Nasdaq Stock Market on December 31, 2019 through and including the last day of the fiscal year covered (each one-year, two-year or three-year period, the “Measurement Period”), assuming dividend reinvestment, plus (ii) the difference between our closing stock price at the end versus the beginning of the Measurement Period ($66.03 per share and $51.97 per share, respectively), divided by (b) our closing share price at the beginning of the Measurement Period ($66.03 per share). Each of these yearly percentage changes was then applied to a deemed fixed investment of $100 at the beginning of the Measurement Period to produce the Covered Year-end values of such investment as of the end of 2022, 2021 and 2020, as applicable. Because Covered Years are presented in the table in reverse chronological order (from top to bottom), the table should be read from bottom to top for purposes of understanding cumulative returns over time.

4.For purposes of this pay versus performance disclosure, our peer group is the S&P 600 Property & Casualty Insurance Index (the PVP “Peer Group”). For each Covered Year, our peer group cumulative total shareholder return was calculated based on a deemed fixed investment of $100 through the Measurement Period, assuming dividend reinvestment for the PVP Peer Group.

5.Net income is calculated in accordance with U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles.

46

6.Combined Ratio is calculated as the sum of: (1) incurred losses divided by net premiums earned; (2) underwriting expenses divided by net premiums written; and (3) dividends to policyholders divided by net premiums earned.

The following charts provide, across the Covered Years, (1) illustrations of the relationships between (A) the CAP to the PEO and the average of the CAP to our non-PEO named executive officers (in each case as set forth in the PVP Table above) and (B) each of the performance measures set forth in columns (f), (h) and (i) of the PVP Table above, and (2) a comparison between our TSR and the TSR of the PVP Peer Group.

Relationship of Compensation Actually Paid to Company Combined Ratio

 

Relationship of Compensation Actually Paid to Company Net Income

Relationship of Compensation Actually Paid to Total Shareholders Return

Relationship of Compensation Actually Paid to Company Combined Ratio

47

 

Relationship of Compensation Actually Paid to Company Net Income

 

48

The following table lists the three financial performance measures that we believe represent the most important financial performance measures we used to link compensation actually paid to our named executive officers for fiscal year 2022 to our performance:

Combined Ratio

Gross Premium Written

Return on Equity

Certain Relationships and Related Transactions

Policy. The Company has adopted a written policy regarding the approval of any transaction or series of transactions in which the Company and a related party have an interest. A related party is one of the Company’s executive officers, directors, director nominees, a person owning more than 5% of any class of the Company’s securities, an entity in which any of such persons is employed or is a partner or principal or an immediate family member of such a person. Related party transactions involving $50,000 or more are required, when circumstances permit, to be submitted to and approved by the Audit Committee at a regular meeting held in advance of the transaction. The chair of the Audit Committee has the authority to approve related party transactions in circumstances in which the Company’s Chief Compliance Officer determines it is impracticable or undesirable to wait until the next regularly scheduled Audit Committee meeting. Aspects of proposed related party transactions to be considered in granting approval include whether the transaction benefits the Company, whether the goods or services in question are available from other sources and whether the terms of the proposed transaction are comparable to those available in transactions with unrelated third parties.

49

EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION

As of December 31, 2022, the 2022 Incentive Plan and the Non-Employee Director Restricted Stock Plan (the "Non-Employee Director Plan") were the only compensation plans under which securities of the Company were authorized for issuance. These plans were approved by the Company’s shareholders. The Company has no equity compensation plans that have not been approved by its shareholders. The table provides information as of December 31, 2022.

Plan Category	Number of shares of common stock to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights		Weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options, warrants and rights		Number of shares of common stock remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans
Equity compensation plans approved by shareholders		22,826		—		482,242	(1)

__________

1.Represents 29,992 shares of common stock available for issuance under the Non-Employee Director Plan and 475,076 shares of common stock available for issuance under the 2022 Incentive Plan, in each case as of December 31, 2022, all of which are available for issuance with respect to awards other than option, warrants or rights, such as restricted stock.

50

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF MANAGEMENT AND CERTAIN BENEFICIAL HOLDERS

The tables below provide information regarding the beneficial ownership of the Company’s common stock as of April 17, 2023 for:

•each of our directors;

•each of our named executive officers;

•all directors and executive officers as a group; and

•each beneficial owner of more than five percent of the Company’s common stock.

The tables below list the number of shares and percentage of shares beneficially owned based on 19,151,597 shares of common stock outstanding as of April 17, 2023.

Beneficial ownership of the Company’s common stock is determined in accordance with the rules of the SEC and generally includes voting power or investment power with respect to securities held. Except as indicated and subject to applicable community property laws, to our knowledge the persons named in the tables below have sole voting and investment power with respect to all shares of common stock shown as beneficially owned by them.

Directors and Executive Officers

Name of Beneficial Owner	Number of Shares/Units		Percentage of Outstanding Shares/Units
Michael J. Brown (1)		7,647	*
Teri G. Fontenot (1)		6,894	*
Philip A. Garcia (1)(2)		20,129	*
Billy B. Greer (1)		1,747	*
Jared A. Morris (1)(3)		78,278	*
Randall E. Roach (1)		11,748	*
Sean Traynor (1)		11,212	*
G. Janelle Frost		80,853	*
Vincent J. Gagliano		19,711	*
Andrew B. McCray (4)		9,360	*
Anastasios G. Omiridis (4)		22,826	*
Kathryn H. Shirley		13,840	*
Neal A. Fuller (5)		20,787	*
All directors and executive officers as a group (13) persons) (4)		305,032	1.59%

__________

* Less than 1%.

1.Includes 1,486 shares of restricted stock granted on the date of our 2022 annual meeting of shareholders pursuant to our Director Plan. Each director has sole voting power but no dispositive power with respect to these shares. These shares vest on the date of the Annual Meeting.

2.Includes 18,643 shares beneficially owned through a revocable trust, of which Mr. Garcia is the sole trustee.

3.Includes 60,317 shares beneficially owned through a trust, of which Mr. J. Morris is a trustee.

4.Includes shares of restricted common stock for which the executives have sole voting power but no dispositive power as follows: Mr. McCray (4,950 restricted shares), Mr. Omiridis (22,826 restricted share units) and all directors and executive officers as a group (38,178 shares).

5.As reported in Mr. Fuller's most recently filed Form 4 filed with the SEC, dated May 23, 2022.

51

Five Percent Holders

The following table sets forth information regarding the number and percentage of shares of common stock held by all persons and entities who are known by the Company to beneficially own five percent or more of the Company’s outstanding common stock. The information regarding beneficial ownership of common stock by the entities identified below is included in reliance on a report filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission by such entity, except that the percentages are based upon the Company’s calculations made in reliance upon the number of shares reported to be beneficially owned by such entity in such report and the number of shares of common stock outstanding on April 17, 2023.

Name of Beneficial Owner	Number of Shares		Percentage of Outstanding Shares
Blackrock, Inc (1)		3,162,686		16.4	%
Victory Capital Management, Inc. (2)		1,367,026		7.1	%
Neuberger Berman Group LLC (3)		1,358,886		7.0	%
The Vanguard Group (4)		1,313,108		6.8	%

__________

1.According to an amended Schedule 13G/A filed on January 26, 2023 by Blackrock, Inc. (“Blackrock”), Blackrock has sole voting power with respect to 3,118,575 shares of common stock and sole dispositive power with respect to 3,162,686 shares of common stock. The address for Blackrock is 55 E. 52nd Street, New York, New York 10022.

2.According to an amended Schedule 13G/A filed on January 31, 2023 Victory Capital Management, Inc (“Victory”), Victory has sole voting power with respect to 1,359,046 shares of common stock, and sole dispositive power with respect to 1,367,026 shares of common stock. The address for Victory is 4900 Tiedeman Rd. 4th Floor Brooklyn, OH 44144.

3.According to a Schedule 13G filed on February 10, 2023 by Neuberger Berman Group LLC (“Neuberger”), Neuberger Group has shared voting power with respect to 1,344,050 shares of common stock and shared dispositive power with respect to 1,358,886 shares of common stock. The address for Neuberger is 1290 Avenue of the Americas, New York, New York 10104.

4.According to an amended Schedule 13G filed on February 9, 2023 by The Vanguard Group (“Vanguard”), Vanguard has shared voting power with respect to 13,583 shares of common stock, sole dispositive power with respect to 1,283,175 shares of common stock and shared dispositive power with respect to 29,933 shares of common stock. The address for Vanguard is 100 Vanguard Blvd., Malvern, Pennsylvania 19355.

52

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE INTERLOCKS AND INSIDER PARTICIPATION

During 2022, Mr. Brown, Mr. Garcia, Mr. Greer, Mr. J. Morris, Mr. Roach and Mr. Traynor served as members of the Compensation Committee. No member of the Compensation Committee (1) was, during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2022, or had previously been, an officer or employee of the Company or (2) had any material interest in a transaction of the Company or a business relationship with, or any indebtedness to, the Company. None of our executive officers have served as members of a board of directors or compensation committee of any other entity that has an executive officer serving as a member of our Board or Compensation Committee.

53

AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT

The Audit Committee is responsible for the appointment, compensation and oversight of the independent registered public accounting firm. In 2022, the Audit Committee again selected Ernst & Young LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm. The Committee considered Ernst & Young’s qualifications and work quality, as well as the quality of personnel assigned to our audit, in making the appointment.

Management is responsible for the Company’s system of internal controls over financial reporting and for preparing its financial statements. The Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, Ernst & Young LLP, is responsible for performing an independent audit of the Company’s consolidated financial statements in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (“PCAOB”), and to issue a report thereon. The Audit Committee is responsible for overseeing management’s conduct of the financial reporting process and system of internal control. It also oversees the Company’s internal audit department, approving its audit plans, reviewing its reports, and evaluating its performance. The Audit Committee monitors “whistleblower” activity under Section 806 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, receiving reports through the Company’s toll-free whistle-blower “hotline.” The Committee is comprised of four independent directors and operates under a written charter adopted by the Board of Directors and reviewed annually by the Committee. The Board determined that Ms. Fontenot, Mr. Brown, Mr. Garcia, Mr. J. Morris and Mr. Roach each meet the requirements of “audit committee financial expert” as defined by SEC rules. The charter is available on the Company’s website in the Investors Section at www.amerisafe.com.

The Audit Committee reviewed and discussed with both management and the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm the audited financial statements of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2022 prior to their issuance. During 2022, management advised the Audit Committee that each set of financial statements reviewed had been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and reviewed significant accounting and disclosure issues with the Audit Committee. These reviews included discussion with the independent registered public accounting firm of matters required by Auditing Standards No. 61, as adopted by the PCAOB in Rule 3200T and by SEC Regulation S-X Rule 2-07, Communications with Audit Committees, as currently in effect, including the quality of the Company’s accounting principles, the reasonableness of significant judgments, and the clarity of disclosures in the financial statements. The Committee also discussed with Ernst & Young LLP the challenging, subjective or complex judgments made by the Company in its financial statements. The Committee discussed the critical accounting matter related to the Company’s judgments in the valuation of Loss and Loss Adjustment Reserves and how Ernst & Young LLP addressed the uncertainties related to those judgments in their audit. The Audit Committee also discussed with its independent registered public accounting firm matters relating to its independence and received the written disclosures and letter from Ernst & Young LLP required by applicable requirements of the PCAOB Ethics and Independence Rule 3526 regarding the independent accountant’s communications with the Audit Committee concerning independence. In evaluating Ernst & Young LLP, the Audit Committee reviewed the latest PCAOB evaluation reports for the firm. The committee noted that Ernst & Young LLP had generally improved audit quality results in the last several PCAOB reports. The Committee believes the audit quality provided by Ernst & Young LLP is good.

Taking all of these reviews and discussions into account, all of the Audit Committee members, whose names are listed below, and who reviewed and discussed the 2022 audited financial statements referenced above and who served as members of the Audit Committee during 2022, recommended to the Board that it (a) approve the inclusion of the Company’s audited financial statements in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2022 for filing with the SEC and (b) accept management’s report on its assessment of the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

Members of the Audit Committee

Philip A. Garcia (Chair) Michael J. Brown Teri G. Fontenot Jared A. Morris Randall E. Roach

54

INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

Selection. Ernst & Young LLP served as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for 2022 and has been selected by the Audit Committee to serve as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for 2023. Representatives of Ernst & Young LLP will attend the Annual Meeting, will have an opportunity to make a statement and will be available to respond to appropriate questions.

Audit and Non-Audit Fees. The following table presents fees for audit services rendered by Ernst & Young LLP for the audit of the Company’s annual financial statements for 2022 and 2021 and for fees billed for other services rendered by Ernst & Young LLP.

	2022		2021
Audit fees (1)	$	1,463,400	$	1,355,000
Audit-related fees		—		—
Tax fees		—		—
All other fees		—		—

__________

1.Audit fees consist principally of fees for the audit of the Company’s consolidated financial statements, reviews of the Company’s quarterly financial information, and services that are normally provided by the accountant in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements.

Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures. The Audit Committee’s policy is to pre-approve all audit and non-audit services provided to the Company by its independent registered public accounting firm (except for items exempt from pre-approval requirements under applicable laws and rules). This policy authorizes the Chair of the Audit Committee, in his discretion, to approve non-audit services on an interim basis, between regularly scheduled meetings of the Audit Committee. All audit and non-audit services for 2022 were pre-approved or ratified by the Audit Committee in accordance with this policy.

55

SHAREHOLDER PROPOSALS FOR THE 2024 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS

In order to be included in the Company’s proxy materials for the 2024 annual meeting of shareholders, a shareholder proposal must be received in writing by the Company at 2301 Highway 190 West, DeRidder, Louisiana 70634 by January 2, 2024 and otherwise comply with all requirements of the SEC for shareholder proposals.

In addition, the Company’s Bylaws provide that any shareholder who desires to bring a proposal before an annual meeting of shareholders must give timely written notice of the proposal to the Company’s Secretary. To be timely, the notice (other than a notice recommending a director candidate) must be delivered to the above address not less than 60 nor more than 90 calendar days prior to the annual meeting. In the event public announcement of the date of the annual meeting is not made at least 75 calendar days prior to the date of the annual meeting, the notice must be received not later than the close of business on the 10th calendar day following the day on which public announcement of the date of the annual meeting is first made.

The notice must also describe the shareholder proposal in reasonable detail and provide certain other information required by the Company’s Bylaws. A copy of the Company’s Bylaws is available upon request from the Company’s Secretary.

Under the Company’s Bylaws, a notice recommending a director candidate must be delivered to the above address not less than 60 nor more than 90 calendar days before the anniversary of the date on which the Company first mailed its proxy materials for the prior year’s annual meeting of shareholders. To be timely, a notice recommending a director candidate must be received no earlier than January 29, 2024 and no later than February 28, 2024.

In addition to satisfying the foregoing requirements under the Company’s Bylaws, to comply with the universal proxy rules, stockholders who intend to solicit proxies in support of director nominees other than the Company’s nominees must provide notice that sets forth the information required by Rule 14a-19 under the Exchange Act no later than April 10, 2024.

OTHER MATTERS

The Board does not know of any other matters that are to be presented for action at the Annual Meeting. If any other matters properly come before the Annual Meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof, it is intended that the enclosed proxy will be voted in accordance with the judgment of the persons voting the proxy.

By Order of the Board of Directors,

 

Kathryn H. Shirley

Executive Vice President,

Chief Administrative Officer and Secretary

DeRidder, Louisiana

April 28, 2023

56

THIS PROXY CARD IS VALID ONLY WHEN SIGNED AND DATED.

			For All	Withhold All	For All Except	To withhold authority to vote for any individual nominee(s), mark “For All Except” and write the number(s) of the nominee(s) on the line below.
The Board of Directors recommends you vote FOR the following:
1. Election of Directors			☐	☐	☐
Nominees
1) Michael J. Brown  2) G. Janelle Frost  3) Sean M. Traynor
The Board of Directors recommends you vote FOR proposal 2.			For	Against	Abstain
2. To approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of the Company's named executive officers as described in the Proxy Statement.			☐	☐	☐			NOTE: Such other business as may properly come before the meeting or any adjournment thereof.
The Board of Directors recommends you vote 1 YEAR on proposal 3.		1 year	2 years	3 years	Abstain
3. To recommend, on an advisory basis, the frequency of advisory votes to approve compensation of the Company's named executive officers.		☐	☐	☐	☐
The Board of Directors recommends you vote FOR proposal 4			For	Against	Abstain
4. To ratify the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for 2023.			☐	☐	☐
					☐
Please sign exactly as your name(s) appear(s) hereon. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, or other fiduciary, please give full title as such. Joint owners should each sign personally. All holders must sign. If a corporation or partnership, please sign in full corporate or partnership name, by authorized officer.
Signature [PLEASE SIGN WITHIN BOX]	Date						Signature (Joint Owners)		Date

57

Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Annual Meeting:

The Notice & Proxy Statement and AR/10K Wrap are available at www.proxyvote.com.

	AMERISAFE, INC. Annual Meeting of Shareholders June 9, 2023 9:00 a.m. This proxy is solicited by the Board of Directors The undersigned hereby appoints Anastasios G. Omiridis and Kathryn H. Shirley, and each of them, with power to act without the other and with power of substitution, as proxies and attorneys-in-fact and hereby authorizes them to represent and vote, as provided on the other side, all of the shares of AMERISAFE, Inc. Common Stock that the undersigned is entitled to vote and, in their discretion, to vote upon such other business as may properly come before the Annual Meeting of Shareholders of the Company to be held at 2301 Highway 190 West, DeRidder, Louisiana on June 9, 2023 or any adjournment thereof, with all powers that the undersigned would possess if present at the Meeting. Please review the Notice of the Annual Meeting carefully as it includes information regarding the possibility that the meeting will be held by means of remote communication in light of the evolving coronavirus situation. This proxy, when properly executed, will be voted in the manner directed herein. If no such direction is made, this proxy will be voted in accordance with the Board of Directors’ recommendations.
		Continued and to be signed on reverse side

58

XML

Document and Entity Information	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2022
Cover [Abstract]
Document Type	DEF 14A
Amendment Flag	false
Entity Registrant Name	AMERISAFE, Inc.
Entity Central Index Key	0001018979

XML

Pay vs Performance Disclosure

12 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2022

USD ($)

Dec. 31, 2021

USD ($)

Dec. 31, 2020

USD ($)

Pay vs Performance Disclosure [Table]

Pay vs Performance [Table Text Block]

Pay Versus Performance

As required by pay versus performance rules adopted by the SEC on August 25, 2022 ("PVP Rules") and in effect for the first time for this proxy statement, the below Pay Versus Performance table ("PVP Table") provides information about compensation for this proxy statement's named executive officers ("NEOs"), as well as NEOs from our 2020 and 2021 proxy statements (each of 2020, 2021, 2022, a "Covered Year"). The PVP Table also provides information about the results for certain financial performance measures during those same Covered Years. In reviewing this information, there are a few important things to consider:

•The information in columns (b) and (d) comes directly from this and prior years' Summary Compensation Tables, without adjustment;

•As required by the PVP Rules, we describe the information in columns (c) and (e) as "compensation actually paid" (or "CAP") to the applicable NEOs, but these CAP amounts do not entirely reflect compensation that our NEOs actually earned for their service in the Covered Years. Instead, CAP reflects a combination of realized pay (primarily for cash amounts) and realizable or accrued pay (primarily for equity awards); and

•As required by the PVP Rules, we provide information about our total shareholders return ("TSR") results, S&P 600 Property & Casualty Insurance Index ("PVP Peer Group") TSR results and U.S. GAAP net income results (the "External Measures") during the Covered Years in the PVP Table, but we did not actually base any compensation decisions for the NEOs on, or link any NEO pay to, these particular External Measures because the External Measures were not metrics used in our incentive plans during the Covered Years.

Due to the use of Combined Ratio performance measure in our long-term incentive program, the Company has determined that, pursuant to the PVP Rules, Combined Ratio should be designated as the "Company-Selected Measure" because we believe it is the most important financial measure that we used to link 2022 named executive officer pay to our performance.

									Value of Initial Fixed $100 Investment Based On:
Year (a)	Summary Compensation Total for PEO(1) (b)		Compensation Actually Paid to PEO(2)  (c)		Average Summary Compensation Table Total for Non-PEO Named Executive Officers (d)		Average Compensation Actually Paid to Non-PEO Named Executive Officers(2) (e)		Total Share-holder Return(3) (f)		Peer Group Total Shareholder Return(4) (g)		Net Income(5) (h)	Combined Ratio(6) (i)
2022	$	1,525,516	$	2,185,161	$	817,885	$	1,472,921	$	125.65	$	127.00	55.6M	83.6%
2021		1,927,841		1,064,627		695,230		488,309		125.00		151.74	65.8M	85.7%
2020		1,942,129		2,086,210		701,504		671,375		159.46		181.70	86.6M	76.3%

__________

1.G. Janelle Frost was our principal executive officer (“PEO”) for the full year for each of 2022, 2021 and 2020. For 2022, our non-PEO named executive officers were Neal A. Fuller (CFO), Anastasios Omiridis (CFO), Vincent J. Gagliano, Andrew B. McCray and Kathryn H. Shirley. For 2021 and 2020, our non-PEO named executive officers were Neal A. Fuller, Vincent J. Gagliano, Andrew B. McCray and Kathryn H. Shirley.

2.For each “Covered Year”, in determining both the compensation “actually paid” to our PEO and the average compensation “actually paid” to our non-PEO named executive officers for purposes of this “PVP Table”, we deducted from or added back to the total amounts of compensation reported in column (b) or column (d) for such Covered Year the amounts set forth in the following table. Certain of the values in this table are calculated based on the probable outcome of performance-based awards as of various dates. For purposes of performance-based awards outstanding as of December 31, 2022, probable outcome as of 2022 fiscal year-end has been calculated using the most recently available data as of the date of this filing, which is based on results through September 30, 2022.

Item and Value Added (Deducted)	2022			2021			2020
For G. Janelle Frost:
- change in actuarial present value of pension benefits	NA			NA			NA
+ service cost of pension benefits	NA			NA			NA
+ prior service cost of pension benefits	NA			NA			NA
- SCT “Stock Awards” column value	$	(602,572	)	$	(1,029,041	)	$	(1,098,937	)
- SCT “Option Awards” column value	$	—		$	—		$	—
+ year-end fair value of outstanding equity awards granted in Covered Year	$	879,345		$	519,673		$	1,111,063
+/- change in fair value of outstanding equity awards granted in prior years[4]	$	351,595		$	(369,690	)	$	98,290
+ vesting date fair value of equity awards granted and vested in Covered Year	$	—		$	—		$	—
+/- change in fair value of prior-year equity awards vested in Covered Year	$	31,277		$	15,844		$	30,773
- prior year-end fair value of prior-year equity awards forfeited in Covered Year	$	—		$	—		$	—
+ includable dividends/earnings on equity awards during Covered Year	$	—		$	—		$	2,893
For Non-PEO Named Executive Officers (Average):
- change in actuarial present value of pension benefits	$	—		$	—		$	—
+ service cost of pension benefits	$	—		$	—		$	—
+ prior service cost of pension benefits	$	—		$	—		$	—
- SCT “Stock Awards” column value	$	(338,623	)	$	(254,049	)	$	(271,305	)
- SCT “Option Awards” column value	$	—		$	—		$	—
+ year-end fair value of outstanding equity awards granted in Covered Year	$	442,865		$	128,297		$	274,299
+/- change in fair value of outstanding equity awards granted in prior years	$	10,041		$	(115,902	)	$	(59,274	)
+ vesting date fair value of equity awards granted and vested in Covered Year	$	—		$	—		$	—
+/- change in fair value of prior-year equity awards vested in Covered Year	$	7,513		$	(487	)	$	7,099
- prior year-end fair value of prior-year equity awards forfeited in Covered Year	$	467,263		$	—		$	—
+ includable dividends/earnings on equity awards during Covered Year	$	65,976		$	35,221		$	19,052

3.For each Covered Year, our TSR was calculated as the yearly percentage change in our cumulative total shareholder return on our common stock, par value $0.01 per share, measured as the quotient of (a) the sum of (i) the cumulative amount of dividends for a period beginning with our closing price on Nasdaq Stock Market on December 31, 2019 through and including the last day of the fiscal year covered (each one-year, two-year or three-year period, the “Measurement Period”), assuming dividend reinvestment, plus (ii) the difference between our closing stock price at the end versus the beginning of the Measurement Period ($66.03 per share and $51.97 per share, respectively), divided by (b) our closing share price at the beginning of the Measurement Period ($66.03 per share). Each of these yearly percentage changes was then applied to a deemed fixed investment of $100 at the beginning of the Measurement Period to produce the Covered Year-end values of such investment as of the end of 2022, 2021 and 2020, as applicable. Because Covered Years are presented in the table in reverse chronological order (from top to bottom), the table should be read from bottom to top for purposes of understanding cumulative returns over time.

4.For purposes of this pay versus performance disclosure, our peer group is the S&P 600 Property & Casualty Insurance Index (the PVP “Peer Group”). For each Covered Year, our peer group cumulative total shareholder return was calculated based on a deemed fixed investment of $100 through the Measurement Period, assuming dividend reinvestment for the PVP Peer Group.

5.Net income is calculated in accordance with U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles.

6.Combined Ratio is calculated as the sum of: (1) incurred losses divided by net premiums earned; (2) underwriting expenses divided by net premiums written; and (3) dividends to policyholders divided by net premiums earned.

Company Selected Measure Name

Combined Ratio

Named Executive Officers, Footnote [Text Block]

1.G. Janelle Frost was our principal executive officer (“PEO”) for the full year for each of 2022, 2021 and 2020. For 2022, our non-PEO named executive officers were Neal A. Fuller (CFO), Anastasios Omiridis (CFO), Vincent J. Gagliano, Andrew B. McCray and Kathryn H. Shirley. For 2021 and 2020, our non-PEO named executive officers were Neal A. Fuller, Vincent J. Gagliano, Andrew B. McCray and Kathryn H. Shirley.

Peer Group Issuers, Footnote [Text Block]

For purposes of this pay versus performance disclosure, our peer group is the S&P 600 Property & Casualty Insurance Index (the PVP “Peer Group”). For each Covered Year, our peer group cumulative total shareholder return was calculated based on a deemed fixed investment of $100 through the Measurement Period, assuming dividend reinvestment for the PVP Peer Group.

PEO Total Compensation Amount

$ 1,525,516

$ 1,927,841

$ 1,942,129

PEO Actually Paid Compensation Amount

$ 2,185,161

1,064,627

2,086,210

Adjustment To PEO Compensation, Footnote [Text Block]

2.For each “Covered Year”, in determining both the compensation “actually paid” to our PEO and the average compensation “actually paid” to our non-PEO named executive officers for purposes of this “PVP Table”, we deducted from or added back to the total amounts of compensation reported in column (b) or column (d) for such Covered Year the amounts set forth in the following table. Certain of the values in this table are calculated based on the probable outcome of performance-based awards as of various dates. For purposes of performance-based awards outstanding as of December 31, 2022, probable outcome as of 2022 fiscal year-end has been calculated using the most recently available data as of the date of this filing, which is based on results through September 30, 2022.

Item and Value Added (Deducted)	2022			2021			2020
For G. Janelle Frost:
- change in actuarial present value of pension benefits	NA			NA			NA
+ service cost of pension benefits	NA			NA			NA
+ prior service cost of pension benefits	NA			NA			NA
- SCT “Stock Awards” column value	$	(602,572	)	$	(1,029,041	)	$	(1,098,937	)
- SCT “Option Awards” column value	$	—		$	—		$	—
+ year-end fair value of outstanding equity awards granted in Covered Year	$	879,345		$	519,673		$	1,111,063
+/- change in fair value of outstanding equity awards granted in prior years[4]	$	351,595		$	(369,690	)	$	98,290
+ vesting date fair value of equity awards granted and vested in Covered Year	$	—		$	—		$	—
+/- change in fair value of prior-year equity awards vested in Covered Year	$	31,277		$	15,844		$	30,773
- prior year-end fair value of prior-year equity awards forfeited in Covered Year	$	—		$	—		$	—
+ includable dividends/earnings on equity awards during Covered Year	$	—		$	—		$	2,893
For Non-PEO Named Executive Officers (Average):
- change in actuarial present value of pension benefits	$	—		$	—		$	—
+ service cost of pension benefits	$	—		$	—		$	—
+ prior service cost of pension benefits	$	—		$	—		$	—
- SCT “Stock Awards” column value	$	(338,623	)	$	(254,049	)	$	(271,305	)
- SCT “Option Awards” column value	$	—		$	—		$	—
+ year-end fair value of outstanding equity awards granted in Covered Year	$	442,865		$	128,297		$	274,299
+/- change in fair value of outstanding equity awards granted in prior years	$	10,041		$	(115,902	)	$	(59,274	)
+ vesting date fair value of equity awards granted and vested in Covered Year	$	—		$	—		$	—
+/- change in fair value of prior-year equity awards vested in Covered Year	$	7,513		$	(487	)	$	7,099
- prior year-end fair value of prior-year equity awards forfeited in Covered Year	$	467,263		$	—		$	—
+ includable dividends/earnings on equity awards during Covered Year	$	65,976		$	35,221		$	19,052

Non-PEO NEO Average Total Compensation Amount

$ 817,885

695,230

701,504

Non-PEO NEO Average Compensation Actually Paid Amount

$ 1,472,921

488,309

671,375

Adjustment to Non-PEO NEO Compensation Footnote [Text Block]

2.For each “Covered Year”, in determining both the compensation “actually paid” to our PEO and the average compensation “actually paid” to our non-PEO named executive officers for purposes of this “PVP Table”, we deducted from or added back to the total amounts of compensation reported in column (b) or column (d) for such Covered Year the amounts set forth in the following table. Certain of the values in this table are calculated based on the probable outcome of performance-based awards as of various dates. For purposes of performance-based awards outstanding as of December 31, 2022, probable outcome as of 2022 fiscal year-end has been calculated using the most recently available data as of the date of this filing, which is based on results through September 30, 2022.

Item and Value Added (Deducted)	2022			2021			2020
For G. Janelle Frost:
- change in actuarial present value of pension benefits	NA			NA			NA
+ service cost of pension benefits	NA			NA			NA
+ prior service cost of pension benefits	NA			NA			NA
- SCT “Stock Awards” column value	$	(602,572	)	$	(1,029,041	)	$	(1,098,937	)
- SCT “Option Awards” column value	$	—		$	—		$	—
+ year-end fair value of outstanding equity awards granted in Covered Year	$	879,345		$	519,673		$	1,111,063
+/- change in fair value of outstanding equity awards granted in prior years[4]	$	351,595		$	(369,690	)	$	98,290
+ vesting date fair value of equity awards granted and vested in Covered Year	$	—		$	—		$	—
+/- change in fair value of prior-year equity awards vested in Covered Year	$	31,277		$	15,844		$	30,773
- prior year-end fair value of prior-year equity awards forfeited in Covered Year	$	—		$	—		$	—
+ includable dividends/earnings on equity awards during Covered Year	$	—		$	—		$	2,893
For Non-PEO Named Executive Officers (Average):
- change in actuarial present value of pension benefits	$	—		$	—		$	—
+ service cost of pension benefits	$	—		$	—		$	—
+ prior service cost of pension benefits	$	—		$	—		$	—
- SCT “Stock Awards” column value	$	(338,623	)	$	(254,049	)	$	(271,305	)
- SCT “Option Awards” column value	$	—		$	—		$	—
+ year-end fair value of outstanding equity awards granted in Covered Year	$	442,865		$	128,297		$	274,299
+/- change in fair value of outstanding equity awards granted in prior years	$	10,041		$	(115,902	)	$	(59,274	)
+ vesting date fair value of equity awards granted and vested in Covered Year	$	—		$	—		$	—
+/- change in fair value of prior-year equity awards vested in Covered Year	$	7,513		$	(487	)	$	7,099
- prior year-end fair value of prior-year equity awards forfeited in Covered Year	$	467,263		$	—		$	—
+ includable dividends/earnings on equity awards during Covered Year	$	65,976		$	35,221		$	19,052

Equity Valuation Assumption Difference, Footnote [Text Block]

3.For each Covered Year, our TSR was calculated as the yearly percentage change in our cumulative total shareholder return on our common stock, par value $0.01 per share, measured as the quotient of (a) the sum of (i) the cumulative amount of dividends for a period beginning with our closing price on Nasdaq Stock Market on December 31, 2019 through and including the last day of the fiscal year covered (each one-year, two-year or three-year period, the “Measurement Period”), assuming dividend reinvestment, plus (ii) the difference between our closing stock price at the end versus the beginning of the Measurement Period ($66.03 per share and $51.97 per share, respectively), divided by (b) our closing share price at the beginning of the Measurement Period ($66.03 per share). Each of these yearly percentage changes was then applied to a deemed fixed investment of $100 at the beginning of the Measurement Period to produce the Covered Year-end values of such investment as of the end of 2022, 2021 and 2020, as applicable. Because Covered Years are presented in the table in reverse chronological order (from top to bottom), the table should be read from bottom to top for purposes of understanding cumulative returns over time.

Compensation Actually Paid vs. Total Shareholder Return [Text Block]

Relationship of Compensation Actually Paid to Total Shareholders Return

Compensation Actually Paid vs. Net Income [Text Block]

Relationship of Compensation Actually Paid to Company Net Income

Compensation Actually Paid vs. Company Selected Measure [Text Block]

Relationship of Compensation Actually Paid to Company Combined Ratio

Tabular List [Table Text Block]

The following table lists the three financial performance measures that we believe represent the most important financial performance measures we used to link compensation actually paid to our named executive officers for fiscal year 2022 to our performance:

Combined Ratio

Gross Premium Written

Return on Equity

Total Shareholder Return Amount

$ 125.65

125.00

159.46

Peer Group Total Shareholder Return Amount

127.00

151.74

181.70

Net Income (Loss)

$ 55,600,000

$ 65,800,000

$ 86,600,000

Company Selected Measure Amount

0.836

0.857

0.763

PEO Name

G. Janelle Frost

G. Janelle Frost

G. Janelle Frost

Measure [Axis]: 1

Pay vs Performance Disclosure [Table]

Measure Name

Combined Ratio

Measure [Axis]: 2

Pay vs Performance Disclosure [Table]

Measure Name

Gross Premium Written

Measure [Axis]: 3

Pay vs Performance Disclosure [Table]

Measure Name

Return on Equity

PEO [Member] | Stock Awards [Member]

Pay vs Performance Disclosure [Table]

Adjustment to Compensation Amount

$ 602,572

$ 1,029,041

$ 1,098,937

PEO [Member] | Year-end Fair Value of Outstanding Equity Awards Granted in Covered Year [Member]

Pay vs Performance Disclosure [Table]

Adjustment to Compensation Amount

879,345

519,673

1,111,063

PEO [Member] | Change in Fair Value of Outstanding Equity Awards Granted in Prior Years [Member]

Pay vs Performance Disclosure [Table]

Adjustment to Compensation Amount

351,595

(369,690)

98,290

PEO [Member] | Change in Fair Value of Prior-year Equity Awards Vested in Covered Year [Member]

Pay vs Performance Disclosure [Table]

Adjustment to Compensation Amount

31,277

15,844

30,773

PEO [Member] | Includable Dividends/Earnings on Equity Awards During Covered Year [Member]

Pay vs Performance Disclosure [Table]

Adjustment to Compensation Amount

2,893

Non-PEO NEO [Member] | Stock Awards [Member]

Pay vs Performance Disclosure [Table]

Adjustment to Compensation Amount

338,623

254,049

271,305

Non-PEO NEO [Member] | Year-end Fair Value of Outstanding Equity Awards Granted in Covered Year [Member]

Pay vs Performance Disclosure [Table]

Adjustment to Compensation Amount

442,865

128,297

274,299

Non-PEO NEO [Member] | Change in Fair Value of Outstanding Equity Awards Granted in Prior Years [Member]

Pay vs Performance Disclosure [Table]

Adjustment to Compensation Amount

10,041

(115,902)

(59,274)

Non-PEO NEO [Member] | Change in Fair Value of Prior-year Equity Awards Vested in Covered Year [Member]

Pay vs Performance Disclosure [Table]

Adjustment to Compensation Amount

7,513

(487)

7,099

Non-PEO NEO [Member] | Prior Year-end Fair Value of Prior-year Equity Awards Forfeited in Covered Year [Member]

Pay vs Performance Disclosure [Table]

Adjustment to Compensation Amount

467,263

Non-PEO NEO [Member] | Includable Dividends/Earnings on Equity Awards During Covered Year [Member]

Pay vs Performance Disclosure [Table]

Adjustment to Compensation Amount

$ 65,976

$ 35,221

$ 19,052