XML 23 R13.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.10.0.1
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
6 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2018
Fair Value Measurements  
Fair Value Measurements

7. Fair Value Measurements

 

The fair value of a financial instrument represents the amount at which the instrument could be exchanged in a current transaction between willing parties, other than in a forced sale or liquidation. Fair value estimates are made at a specific point in time, based on relevant market information about the financial instrument. These estimates are subjective in nature and involve uncertainties and matters of judgment, and therefore cannot be determined with precision.

 

Accounting standards define fair value as the price that would be received from selling an asset or paid to transfer a liability in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. Accounting standards establish a fair value hierarchy which requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value and also establishes the following three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value:

 

Level 1 - Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.

 

Level 2 - Inputs other than Level 1 that are observable, either directly or indirectly, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities.

 

Level 3 - Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities.

 

The following methods and assumptions were used by the Company in estimating fair value disclosures for financial instruments:

 

·

Cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, operating lease related receivables, and accounts payable: The amounts reported in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets approximate fair value due to their short-term nature.

 

·

Debt obligations: The carrying amount of the Company’s outstanding balance on its Debt obligations as of June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017 was estimated to have a fair value of approximately $1,089.5 million and $1,090.0 million, respectively, based on the fair value of estimated future payments calculated using interest rates that approximate prevailing market rates at each period end (Level 2 inputs).

 

Assets Measured and Recorded at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis 

 

As of June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, the Company measured the fair value of its interest rate swap of $100.0 million (notional amount) based on Level 2 inputs, due to the usage of inputs that can be corroborated by observable market data. The Company estimates the fair value of derivative instruments using a discounted cash flow technique and has used creditworthiness inputs that corroborate observable market data evaluating the Company’s and counterparties’ risk of non-performance. The interest rate swap agreement had a net fair value of $2.5 million and $1.1 million as of June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, respectively.  For the six months ended June 30, 2018, $69 thousand was realized through the income statement as a decrease in interest expense. For the six months ended June 30, 2017, $0.4 million was realized through the income statement as an increase in interest expense.

 

Assets Measured and Recorded at Fair Value on a Nonrecurring Basis

 

The Company determines fair value of long-lived assets held and used, such as Equipment held for operating lease and Equipment held for sale, by reference to independent appraisals, quoted market prices (e.g. an offer to purchase) and other factors. An impairment charge is recorded when the carrying value of the asset exceeds its fair value. The Company used Level 2 inputs to measure write-downs of equipment held for lease, equipment held for sale and spare parts inventory as of June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Assets at Fair Value

 

Total Losses

 

 

June 30, 2018

 

December 31, 2017

 

Six Months Ended June 30,

 

   

Level 1

   

Level 2

   

Level 3

   

Total

   

Level 1

   

Level 2

   

Level 3

   

Total

   

2018

   

2017

 

 

(in thousands)

 

(in thousands)

Equipment held for lease

 

$

 —

 

$

 —

 

$

 —

 

$

 —

 

$

 —

 

$

23,255

 

$

 —

 

$

23,255

 

$

 —

 

$

(9,019)

Equipment held for sale

 

 

 —

 

 

3,227

 

 

 —

 

 

3,227

 

 

 —

 

 

39,261

 

 

 —

 

 

39,261

 

 

(3,578)

 

 

(4,423)

Spare parts inventory

 

 

 —

 

 

593

 

 

 —

 

 

593

 

 

 —

 

 

5,336

 

 

 —

 

 

5,336

 

 

(1,517)

 

 

(1,843)

Total

 

$

 —

 

$

3,820

 

$

 —

 

$

3,820

 

$

 —

 

$

67,852

 

$

 —

 

$

67,852

 

$

(5,095)

 

$

(15,285)

 

A write-down of $3.6 million was recorded during the six months ended June 30, 2018 for three engines due to a management decision to part-out the engines, in which the net book values exceeded the estimated proceeds.

 

A write-down of $13.4 million was recorded during the six months ended June 30, 2017 for four engines and three aircraft for which their leases ended or were modified in the period. Management evaluated the equipment return condition, end of lease compensation, accumulated maintenance reserves and expected future proceeds from part out and sale to record its initial best estimate of impairment.