XML 20 R9.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.5.0.2
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
9 Months Ended
Sep. 30, 2016
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies  
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

1.  Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

 

(a)    Basis of Presentation:

 

Our unaudited consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Willis Lease Finance Corporation and its subsidiaries (“we” or the “Company”) and have been prepared pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission for reporting on Form 10-Q. Pursuant to such rules and regulations, certain information and note disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America have been condensed or omitted. The accompanying unaudited interim consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto, together with Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, contained in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015.

 

In the opinion of management, the accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements contain all adjustments necessary to present fairly our financial position as of September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, and the results of our operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, and our cash flows for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015. The results of operations and cash flows for the period ended September 30, 2016 are not necessarily indicative of the results of operations or cash flows which may be reported for the remainder of 2016.

 

(b)    Principles of Consolidation:

 

We evaluate all entities in which we have an economic interest firstly to determine whether for accounting purposes the entity is a variable interest entity or voting interest entity. If the entity is a variable interest entity we consolidate the financial statements of that entity if we are the primary beneficiary of the entities’ activities. If the entity is a voting interest entity we consolidate the entity when we have a majority of voting interests. All inter-company balances are eliminated upon consolidation.

 

(c)   Correction of Immaterial Errors – Consolidated Financial Statements:  

 

During the second quarter of 2016 the Company determined that its financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013 and for prior years and for the quarter ended March 31, 2016 contained errors resulting from the incorrect accounting for equipment purchased with in-place leases. The Company previously did not identify, measure and account for maintenance rights acquired.   The Company’s accounting policy for maintenance rights is described below as note 1(d).  Management evaluated the materiality of the errors described above from a qualitative and quantitative perspective in accordance with the requirements of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 99, Materiality (SAB 99).  Based on such evaluation, we have concluded that these corrections would not be material to any individual prior period and have corrected such balances herein.

 

The associated correcting entries were recorded in the respective period starting with the opening consolidated balance sheet of December 31, 2015.  The Consolidated Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2015 presented herein has been revised as follows: decrease in Equipment Held for Operating Lease by $13.7 million, increase in Maintenance Rights by $12.1 million, decrease in Deferred Income Taxes by $0.6 million and decrease in retained earnings by $1.1 million as of December 31, 2015.

 

The adjustments to the previously reported Consolidated Statement of Income for the three and nine month periods ending September 30, 2015 were as follows: a decrease in Maintenance Reserve Revenue of nil and $1.7 million, respectively;  a decrease in Gain on Sale of Leased Equipment of nil and $34,000, respectively;  an increase (decrease) in Depreciation and Amortization expense of $13,000 and ($72,000), respectively; and a decrease in Income Tax Expense of $15,000 and $0.5 million, a decrease in net income of $26,000 and $1.0 million, respectively; and a decrease in basic and diluted earnings per share of nil and $0.12, respectively.

 

The adjustments to the previously reported Consolidated Statement of cash flows for the nine month periods ending September 30, 2015 were as follows: a decrease in cash provided by operating income of $1.7 million; and a decrease in the cash used by investing activities of $1.7 million.

 

There were other immaterial out of period adjustments recorded that affected lease rent revenue, spare part sales revenue and expense and general and administrative expenses for the nine month months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015.

   

 (d) Maintenance rights

 

We identify, measure and account for maintenance right assets and liabilities associated with acquisitions of equipment with in-place leases. A maintenance right asset represents the fair value of the contractual right under a lease to receive equipment in an improved maintenance condition as compared to the maintenance condition on the acquisition date. A maintenance right liability represents the Company's obligation to pay the lessee for the difference between the lease-end contractual maintenance condition of the equipment and the actual maintenance condition of the equipment on the acquisition date.  The equipment condition at the end of the lease term may result in either overhaul work being performed by the lessee to meet the required return condition or a financial settlement.

 

When a capital event is performed on the equipment by the lessee, which satisfies their maintenance right obligation, the maintenance rights are added to the equipment basis and depreciated to the next capital event.  When equipment is sold before the end of the pre-existing lease, the maintenance rights are applied against any accumulated maintenance reserves, if paid by the lessee, and the remaining balance is applied to the disposition gain or loss.  When a lease terminates, an end of lease true-up is performed and the maintenance right is applied against the accumulated maintenance reserves or, for non-reserve lessees the final settlement payment, and any remaining net maintenance right is recorded in the income statement.

 

Maintenance right assets were $16.8 million and $12.1 million as of September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively.

   

(e)    Fair Value Measurements:

 

Fair value is defined as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. Valuation techniques used to measure fair value must maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs, to the extent possible. We use a fair value hierarchy based on three levels of inputs, of which the first two are considered observable and the last unobservable, to measure fair value which are the following:

 

Level 1 - Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.

 

Level 2 - Inputs other than Level 1 that are observable, either directly or indirectly, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities.

 

Level 3 - Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities.

 

Assets Measured and Recorded at Fair Value on a Nonrecurring Basis

 

We determine fair value of long-lived assets held and used, such as Equipment held for operating lease and Equipment held for sale, by reference to independent appraisals, quoted market prices (e.g. an offer to purchase) and other factors. An impairment charge is recorded when the carrying value of the asset exceeds its fair value.

 

The following table shows by level, within the fair value hierarchy, the Company’s assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis during the nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, and the losses recorded during the nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015 on those assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Assets at Fair Value

 

Total Losses

 

 

September 30, 2016

 

September 30, 2015

 

Nine Months Ended September 30,

 

   

Total

   

Level 1

   

Level 2

   

Level 3

   

Total

   

Level 1

   

Level 2

   

Level 3

   

2016

   

2015

 

 

(in thousands)

 

(in thousands)

Equipment held for lease

 

$

337

 

$

 —

 

$

337

 

$

 —

 

$

1,555

 

$

 —

 

$

1,555

 

$

 —

 

$

(1,893)

 

$

(1,936)

Equipment held for sale

 

 

589

 

 

 —

 

 

589

 

 

 —

 

 

7,477

 

 

 —

 

 

7,477

 

 

 —

 

 

(3,556)

 

 

(6,644)

Spare parts inventory

 

 

1,731

 

 

 —

 

 

1,731

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

(475)

 

 

 —

Total

 

$

2,657

 

$

 —

 

$

2,657

 

$

 —

 

$

9,032

 

$

 —

 

$

9,032

 

$

 —

 

$

(5,924)

 

$

(8,580)

 

At September 30, 2016, the Company used Level 2 inputs to measure equipment held for sale.  Level 2 inputs include quoted prices for similar assets in inactive markets. 

 

An impairment charge is recorded when the carrying value of the asset exceeds its fair value. A write-down of equipment totaling $5.9 million was recorded during the nine months ended September 30, 2016, of which $2.0 million was recorded due to a management decision to consign one engine for part-out and sale, in which the asset’s net book value exceeded the estimated proceeds.  An additional asset write-down of $2.0 million was recorded in the nine months ended September 30, 2016 based upon a comparison of the asset net book values with the revised net proceeds expected from part sales arising from consignment of the parts. A further writedown of $1.9 million was recorded due to the adjustment of the carrying value for an impaired engine within the portfolio to reflect estimated market value.  

 

A write-down of equipment totaling $5.5 million was recorded in the nine month period ended September 30, 2015 due to a management decision to consign four engines for part-out and sale, in which the assets net book value exceeds the estimated proceeds from part-out. A further write-down of equipment totaling $3.1 million was recorded in the three months ended September 30, 2015 to adjust the carrying value of engine parts held on consignment for which market conditions for the sale of parts has changed.

 

(f)    Reclassifications: 

 

Reclassifications have been made to our consolidated financial statements for the prior periods to conform to classifications used during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016.    

 

(g)    Foreign Currency Translation:

 

The Company’s foreign investments have been converted at rates of exchange at September 30, 2016. The changes in exchange rates in our foreign investments reported under the equity method are included in stockholders’ equity as accumulated other comprehensive income.

 

(h)    Recent Accounting Pronouncements:

 

In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU  No. 2016-09, Compensation-Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting. The updated guidance changes how companies account for certain aspects of share-based payment awards to employees, including the accounting for income taxes, forfeitures, and statutory tax withholding requirements, as well as classification in the statement of cash flows. The update to the standard is effective for the Company beginning January 1, 2017, with early application permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact that the guidance will have on the Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, “Leases” (topic 842).  Under the new standard, the accounting for leases by lessors would basically remain unchanged from the existing concepts in ASC 840, Leases. In addition, FASB has decided that lessors would be precluded from recognizing selling profit and revenue at lease commencement for any sales-type or direct finance lease that does not transfer control of the underlying asset to the lessee. The standard will be effective for public business entities for annual periods (including interim periods), beginning after December 15, 2018, and early adoption will be permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the potential impact the adoption of the standard will have on its consolidated financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

 

In July 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-11, Simplifying the Measurement of Inventory, which simplifies the measurement of inventory by requiring certain inventory to be measured at the lower of cost or net realizable value. The amendments in this ASU are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016 and for interim periods therein. We are evaluating the impact that this new guidance will have on our consolidated financial position.

 

In April 2015, the FASB issued ASU. 2015-03, "Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs".  ASU 2015-03 requires that debt issuance costs related to a recognized debt liability be presented in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of that debt liability, consistent with the accounting treatment for debt discounts. We have adopted ASU 2015-03 during the nine-month period ended September 30, 2016. Other assets and Long-term debt, net of discount have been revised as of December 31, 2015 to reflect the retroactive reclassification of $12.6 million of debt issuance costs that have been reclassified from Other assets to Notes payable.

 

In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, which supersedes previous revenue recognition guidance. The new standard requires that a company recognize revenue when it transfers promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration the company expects to receive in exchange for those goods or services. Companies will need to use more judgment and estimates than under the guidance currently in effect, including estimating the amount of variable revenue to recognize over each identified performance obligation. Additional disclosures will be required to help users of financial statements understand the nature, amount and timing of revenue and cash flows arising from contracts. In July 2015, the FASB deferred the effective date for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017 (including interim reporting periods within those periods). Early adoption is permitted to the original effective date of December 15, 2016 (including interim reporting periods within those periods). The amendments may be applied retrospectively to each prior period presented or retrospectively with the cumulative effect recognized as of the date of initial application. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of adopting this new guidance on the consolidated financial statements.