Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

12 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2012

Nature of Business and Basis of presentation / Summary of Significant Accounting Policies [Abstract]

SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES:

The accompanying consolidated financial statements reflect the application of certain significant accounting policies as described in this note and elsewhere in the accompanying consolidated financial statements and notes.

Basis of Presentation –

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Edgewater and its wholly-owned subsidiaries. All intercompany transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

The Company considers events or transactions that occur after the balance sheet date but before the financial statements are issued to provide additional evidence relative to certain estimates or to identify matters that require additional disclosure. The Company did not identify any recognizable events during this period.

Use of Estimates –

Our consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. These accounting principles require management to make certain estimates, judgments and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amount of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. These estimates, judgments and assumptions used in preparing the accompanying consolidated financial statements are based upon management’s evaluation of the relevant facts and circumstances as of the date of the consolidated financial statements. Although the Company regularly assesses these estimates, judgments and assumptions used in preparing these consolidated financial statements, actual results could differ from those estimates. Changes in estimates are recorded in the period in which they become known.

Cash and Cash Equivalents –

Cash and cash equivalent balances consist of deposits and investments in money market funds. All highly liquid investments with remaining maturities of three months or less at the date of purchase are considered cash equivalents. The Company’s cash equivalents consisted of $4.1 million in money market funds as of December 31, 2012 and 2011.

Property and Equipment –

Property and equipment are stated at cost, net of accumulated depreciation and amortization. Property and equipment are depreciated on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives of the assets, which range from three to ten years. Additions that extend the lives of the assets are capitalized, while repairs and maintenance costs are expensed as incurred.

Product Development Costs–

The Company periodically develops software modules to be used within the Microsoft Dynamics AX environment. Capitalization of qualified software development costs begins upon the establishment of technological feasibility. Amortization of capitalized software development costs, which is recorded as a component of cost of revenue, is provided on a product-by-product basis, beginning upon commercial release of the product, and continuing over the remaining estimated economic life of the product, not to exceed three years. At each balance sheet date, the Company evaluates the unamortized capitalized software development costs for potential impairment by comparing the net unamortized balance to the net realizable value of the products. The Company capitalized a total of $235 thousand and $267 thousand in software development costs during the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively. Amortization expense of $156 thousand and $39 thousand has been recorded (within software costs on the consolidated statements of comprehensive income (loss)) during the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively. No amortization expense was recorded during the year ended December 31, 2010, as no products with capitalized costs had been released for commercial sale.

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets –

The Company evaluates its long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of such assets may not be recoverable. Impairment is generally assessed by a comparison of cash flows expected to be generated by an asset to its carrying value. If such assets are considered to be impaired, the impairment to be recognized is measured by the amount by which the carrying amount of the asset exceeds its fair value.

Lease Abandonment –

In December 2011, the Company abandoned certain excess office space within its corporate headquarters in Wakefield, Massachusetts. As a result of the abandonment of such space, the Company incurred a 2011 fourth-quarter, non-cash operating expense charge of approximately $2.2 million and recorded a lease abandonment accrual (the short- and long-term portions of which are recorded within accrued expenses and other long term liabilities within the consolidated balance sheets). The short and long term components of the lease abandonment accrual were $580 thousand and $1.2 million, respectively as of December 31, 2012.

Goodwill and Intangible Assets –

Goodwill has an indefinite useful life and is not amortized but is evaluated for impairment annually (the “Annual Impairment Test”) or whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable. Intangible assets consist primarily of non-compete arrangements, customer relationships and trade names and trademarks. Intangible assets that have finite lives are amortized using either the straight-line method or based on estimated future cash flows to approximate the pattern in which the economic benefit of the asset will be utilized. Amortization is recorded over the estimated useful lives ranging from 1.5 to 7.5 years and is further described in Notes 4 and 7.

The Company engages in business activities in one operating segment, which combines management consulting, technical knowledge, and enterprise management solutions to develop custom technology and business process solutions. The chief operating decision maker formulates decisions about how to allocate resources and assess performance based on consolidated financial results. The Company has three reporting units for purposes of its allocation of goodwill and performance of its impairment evaluation.

Goodwill is tested for impairment annually at the reporting unit level utilizing the “fair value” methodology. The annual measurement date is December 2. Factors the Company considers important that could trigger an interim review for impairment include, but are not limited to, the following:

¡ Significant under-performance relative to historical or projected future operating results;

¡ Significant changes in the manner of its use of acquired assets or the strategy for its overall business;

¡ Significant negative industry or economic trends;

¡ Significant decline in its stock price for a sustained period; and

¡ Its market capitalization relative to net book value.

Goodwill is evaluated for impairment using a two-step process. The first step is to compare the fair value of the reporting unit to the carrying amount of the reporting unit (the “First Step”). If the carrying amount exceeds the fair value, a second step must be followed to calculate potential impairment (the “Second Step”). Otherwise, if the fair value of the reporting unit exceeds the carrying amount, the goodwill is not considered to be impaired as of the measurement date. In its review of the carrying value of the goodwill, the Company determines fair values for the reporting unit using the Income Approach, or more specifically the Discounted Cash Flow Method, and the Market Approach, utilizing the Guideline Company Method. These valuation methods require management to project revenues, operating expenses, working capital investment, capital spending and cash flows for the reporting unit over a multi-year period, as well as determine the weighted average cost of capital to be used as a discount rate. The 2012 analysis confirmed that fair values exceeded carrying values and, therefore, no impairment existed, and accordingly, a second step analysis was not deemed necessary.

Revenue Recognition –

Our Company recognizes revenue primarily through the provision of consulting services and the resale of third-party, off the shelf software and maintenance.

We recognize revenue by providing consulting services under written service contracts with our customers. The service contracts we enter into generally fall into three specific categories: time and materials, fixed-price and retainer.

We consider amounts to be earned once evidence of an arrangement has been obtained, services are delivered, fees are fixed or determinable and collectability is reasonably assured. We establish billing terms at the time at which the project deliverables and milestones are agreed. Our standard payment terms are 30 days from invoice date. Out-of-pocket reimbursable expenses charged to customers are reflected as revenue.

When a customer enters into a time and materials, fixed-price or a periodic retainer-based contract, the Company recognizes revenue in accordance with its evaluation of the deliverables in each contract. If the deliverables represent separate units of accounting, the Company then measures and allocates the consideration from the arrangement to the separate units, based on vendor specific objective evidence (“VSOE”) of the value for each deliverable.

The revenue under time and materials contracts is recognized as services are rendered and performed at contractually agreed upon rates. Revenue pursuant to fixed-price contracts is recognized under the proportional performance method of accounting. We routinely evaluate whether revenue and profitability should be recognized in the current period. We estimate the proportional performance on our fixed-price contracts on a monthly basis utilizing hours incurred to date as a percentage of total estimated hours to complete the project. This method is used because reasonably dependable estimates of costs and revenue earned can be made, based on historical experience and milestones identified in any particular contract. If we do not have a sufficient basis to measure progress toward completion, revenue is recognized upon completion of performance, subject to any warranty provisions or other project management assessments as to the status of work performed.

Estimates of total project costs are continuously monitored during the term of an engagement. There are situations where the number of hours to complete projects may exceed our original estimate, as a result of an increase in project scope, unforeseen events that arise, or the inability of the client or the delivery team to fulfill their responsibilities. Accordingly, recorded revenues and costs are subject to revision throughout the life of a project based on current information and historical trends. Such revisions may result in increases or decreases to revenue and income and are reflected in the consolidated financial statements in the periods in which they are first identified.

If our initial estimates of the resources required or the scope of work to be performed on a contract are inaccurate, or we do not manage the project properly within the planned time period, a provision for estimated losses on incomplete projects is made. Any known or probable losses on projects are charged to operations in the period in which such losses are determined. A formal project review process takes place quarterly, although projects are evaluated on an ongoing basis. Management reviews the estimated total direct costs on each contract to determine if the estimated amounts are accurate, and estimates are adjusted as needed in the period revised estimates are made. No losses were recognized on contracts during the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011, or 2010.

We also perform services on a periodic retainer basis under infrastructure service contracts, which include monthly hosting and support services. Revenue under periodic retainer-based contracts is recognized ratably over the contract period, as outlined within the respective contract. In the event additional services are required, above the minimum retained or contracted amount, then such services are billed on a time and materials basis.

Typically, the Company provides warranty services on its fixed-price contracts related to providing customers with the ability to have any “design flaws” remedied and/or have our Company “fix” routine defects. The warranty services, as outlined in the respective contracts, are provided for a specific period of time after a project is complete. The Company values the warranty services based upon historical labor hours incurred for similar services at standard billing rates. Revenue related to the warranty provisions within our fixed-price contracts is recognized as the services are performed or the revenue is earned. The warranty period is typically for a 30-60 day period after the project is complete.

Customer prepayments, even if nonrefundable, are deferred (classified as deferred revenue) and recognized over future periods as services are performed.

Software revenue represents the resale of certain third-party off-the-shelf software and maintenance and is recorded on a gross basis provided we act as a principal in the transaction, which we have determined based upon several factors including, but not limited to, the fact that we have credit risk and we set the price to the end user. In the event we do not meet the requirements to be considered a principal in the software sale transaction and act as an agent, software revenue will be recorded on a net basis.

The majority of the software sold by the Company is delivered electronically. For software that is delivered electronically, we consider delivery to have occurred when the customer either (a) takes possession of the software via a download (that is, when the customer takes possession of the electronic data on its hardware), or (b) has been provided with access codes that allow the customer to take immediate possession of the software on its hardware pursuant to an agreement or purchase order for the software.

The Company enters into multiple element arrangements which typically include software, post-contract support (or maintenance), and consulting services. Consistent with the software described above, maintenance that is in the form of a pass through transaction is recognized upon delivery of the software, as all related warranty and maintenance is performed by the primary software vendor and not the Company. Maintenance fee revenue for the Company’s software products, which is inconsequential in all years presented, is recognized ratably over the term of the arrangements, which are generally for a one-year period. The Company has established VSOE with respect to the services provided based on the price charged when the services are sold separately. The Company has established VSOE for maintenance based upon the stated renewal rate.

In June 2012, Microsoft purchased Edgewater Fullscope’s Process Industries 2 (“PI2”) software and intellectual property for an aggregate of $3.25 million. The sale of PI2 also included services and represents a significant multiple element contract which the Company entered into during the second quarter of 2012. This contract includes $3.25 million of license consideration and subsequent development and training services. We allocate revenue to each element in a multiple-element arrangement based on the element’s respective fair value, with the fair value determined by the price charged when that element is sold separately. We have determined that the license does not have stand-alone value without the services, and thus the license and services are being accounted for as one unit. We will continue to recognize revenue associated with the Microsoft IP Sale in direct proportion to the actual periodic services performed, as compared to the anticipated development services to be performed over the duration of the agreement. We recognized $788 thousand of license-related revenue, reported as Software revenue in our consolidated statement of comprehensive income, during the year ended December 31, 2012.

During 2011 and 2010, we received royalty revenue in connection with the sale of Microsoft Dynamics AX-related discrete and process manufacturing modules (the “Software Modules”) developed by Fullscope, which were sold to Microsoft in June 2009. Royalty revenues earned were determined as a percentage of net receipts from the periodic sale of license keys and enhancements related to the Software Modules sold by Microsoft. Royalties were recognized as earned in accordance with the contract terms when royalties from licensees could be reasonably estimated and collectability was reasonably assured. The Software Modules contract expired in June 2011, and no revenue has been recognized since the expiration of this contract.

Allowance for Doubtful Accounts –

The Company maintains an allowance for doubtful accounts related to its accounts receivable that have been deemed to have a high risk of uncollectability. Management reviews its accounts receivable balances on a monthly basis to determine if any receivables are potentially uncollectible. Management further analyzes historical collection trends and changes in its customer payment patterns, customer concentration and credit worthiness when evaluating the adequacy of its allowance for doubtful accounts. The Company includes any accounts receivable balances that are deemed to be potentially uncollectible, along with a general reserve, in its overall allowance for doubtful accounts.

Billed and unbilled receivables that are specifically identified as being at risk are provided for with a charge to revenue or bad debts as appropriate in the period the risk is identified.

Based on the information available, management believes the allowance for doubtful accounts is adequate; however, future write-offs could exceed the recorded allowance.

Cost of Services –

Our cost of services are composed primarily of project personnel costs, including direct salaries, payroll taxes, employee benefits, contractor costs and travel expenses for personnel dedicated to customer projects. These costs represent the most significant expense we incur in providing our services.

Other Expense (Income), Net –

The following table represents the components of other expense (income), net:

	Year Ended December 31,
	2012			2011			2010
	(In Thousands)
Interest income	$	(6	)	$	(5	)	$	(32	)
Interest expense		-			10			15
Loss (gain) on foreign exchange transactions		73			122			(17	)
Other expense (income), net	$	67		$	127		$	(34	)

Provision for Taxes –

In determining our current income tax provision, we assess temporary differences resulting from different treatments of items for tax and accounting purposes. These differences result in deferred tax assets and liabilities, which are recorded in our consolidated balance sheets. We evaluate the realizability of our deferred tax assets and assess the need for a valuation allowance on an ongoing basis. In evaluating our deferred tax assets, we consider whether it is more likely than not that the deferred income tax assets will be realized. The ultimate realization of our deferred tax assets depends upon generating sufficient future taxable income during the periods in which our temporary differences either become deductible or expire. This assessment requires significant judgment.

Any future changes in the valuation allowance could result in additional income tax expense (benefit) and reduce or increase stockholders’ equity, and such changes could have a significant impact upon our earnings in the future.

Income tax reserves are based on a determination of whether and how much of a tax benefit taken by the Company in its tax filings or positions is more likely than not realized based on the technical merits of the position. Potential interest and penalties associated with such uncertain tax position is recorded as a component of the income tax provision.

Earnings Per Share –

A reconciliation of net income (loss) and weighted average shares used in computing basic and diluted net income (loss) per share is as follows:

	Year Ended December 31,
	2012		2011		2010
	(In Thousands, Except Per Share Data)
Basic net income (loss) per share:
Net income (loss) applicable to common shares	$	1,447	$	344	$	(23,572	)
Weighted average common shares outstanding		11,180		12,038		12,195
Basic net income (loss) per share of common stock	$	0.13	$	0.03	$	(1.93	)
Diluted net income (loss) per share:
Net income (loss) applicable to common shares	$	1,447	$	344	$	(23,572	)
Weighted average common shares outstanding		11,180		12,038		12,195
Dilutive effects of stock options		409		10		-
Weighted average common shares, assuming dilutive effect of stock options		11,589		12,048		12,195
Diluted net income (loss) per share of common stock	$	0.13	$	0.03	$	(1.93	)

Share-based awards, inclusive of all grants made under the Company’s equity plans, for which either the stock option exercise price, or the fair value of the restricted share award, exceeds the average market price over the period, have an anti-dilutive effect on earnings per share, and accordingly, are excluded from the diluted computations for all periods presented. Had such shares been included, shares for the diluted computation would have increased by approximately 1.7 million, 3.6 million and 1.5 million in the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively. Options to purchase 34 thousand shares of common stock that were outstanding during the year ended December 31, 2010 were not included in the computation of diluted net loss per share due to the reported periodic loss. As of December 31, 2012 and 2011, there were approximately 4.1 million and 3.7 million share-based awards outstanding under the Company’s equity plans, respectively.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments –

Edgewater’s financial instruments include cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable and contingent earnout accruals. The carrying values of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable and accounts payable approximate their fair value due to the relatively short-term nature of the accounts.

Concentrations of Credit Risk –

Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to significant concentration of market or credit risk consist principally of cash equivalent instruments and accounts receivable. The Company places its cash balances with reputable financial institutions. Trade receivables potentially subject the Company to credit risk. The Company extends credit to its customers based upon an evaluation of the customer’s financial condition and credit history and generally does not require collateral.

Cash and cash equivalents are maintained at financial institutions and, at times, balances may exceed federally insured limits. We have never experienced any losses related to these balances. All of our non-interest bearing cash balances were fully insured at December 31, 2012 due to a temporary federal program in effect from December 31, 2010 through December 31, 2012. Under the program, there is no limit to the amount of insurance for eligible accounts. Beginning January 1, 2013, insurance coverage will revert to $250 thousand per depositor at each financial institution and our non-interest bearing cash balances may again exceed federally insured limits. The Company had $14.1 million of cash and equivalents in interest bearing accounts at financial institutions at December 31, 2012.

The Company has historically incurred minimal credit losses. No customer balances were in excess of 10% of the Company’s total receivables balance as of December 31, 2012 or 2011.

For the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011, and 2010, no customer represented 10% or more of the Company’s total revenue or total service revenue. For the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011, and 2010, our five largest customers represented 14.8%, 11.1%, and 15.3% of our service revenue in the aggregate, respectively.

Comprehensive Income (Loss) –

Comprehensive income (loss) consists of periodic currency translation adjustments.

Share-Based Compensation –

The Company recognizes the total fair value of share-based awards as compensation expense, over the requisite employee service period (generally the vesting period of the grant). We have used the Black-Scholes option-pricing model to compute the estimated fair value of stock option grants on the date of the award. The Black-Scholes option-pricing model includes assumptions regarding dividend yields, expected volatility, expected option term and risk-free interest rates. We estimate expected volatility based upon historical volatility. The risk-free interest rate is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant. Restricted stock awards are valued at the price of our common stock on the date of the award.

The assumptions used in computing the fair value of share-based awards reflect management’s best estimates but involve uncertainties relating to market and other conditions, many of which are outside of the Company’s control. As a result, if other assumptions or estimates had been used, the share-based compensation expense that was recorded for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011, and 2010 could have been materially different. Furthermore, if different assumptions are used in future periods, share-based compensation expense could be materially impacted in the future.

Foreign Currency Translation –

The financial statements for Edgewater’s non-U.S. operations use the local currency as the functional currency and are translated to U.S. dollars. For assets and liabilities, the year-end rate is used. For revenues, expenses, gains and losses, the average rate for the period is used. Unrealized currency adjustments in our financial statements are accumulated in equity as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss). Realized net gains (losses) on foreign currency transactions are immaterial and are reflected in earnings.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements –

Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2011-5, “Comprehensive Income” and ASU 2011-12, “Comprehensive Income” require entities to elect the option to present the total of comprehensive income, the components of net income, and the components of other comprehensive income either in a single, continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements. In both choices, an entity is required to present each component of net income along with total net income, each component of other comprehensive income along with a total for other comprehensive income, and a total amount for comprehensive income. This update eliminates the option to present the components of other comprehensive income as part of the statement of changes in stockholders’ equity. The amendments in this update do not change the items that must be reported in other comprehensive income or when an item of other comprehensive income must be reclassified to net income. The adoption of this ASU did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

ASU 2011-04, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures” requires expanded disclosure of certain fair value measurements categorized in Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy. The ASU is effective prospectively for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years beginning after December 12, 2011. The adoption of this ASU did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In July 2012, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2012-02, Intangibles-Goodwill and Other (Topic 350)-Testing Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets for Impairment (“ASU 2012-02”), to allow entities to use a qualitative approach to test indefinite-lived intangible assets for impairment. ASU 2012-02 permits an entity to first perform a qualitative assessment to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of an indefinite-lived intangible asset is less than its carrying value. If it is concluded that this is the case, it is necessary to perform the currently prescribed quantitative impairment test by comparing the fair value of the indefinite-lived intangible asset with its carrying value. Otherwise, the quantitative impairment test is not required. ASU 2012-02 is effective for fiscal years beginning after September 15, 2012. As we do not have any indefinite lived intangible assets other than goodwill, we do not expect this update to have a significant impact on our financial statements.