10-Q

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

x Quarterly report pursuant to Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2007

or

¨ Transition report pursuant to Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

for the transition period from              to             

Commission file number: 0-20971

EDGEWATER TECHNOLOGY, INC.

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)

Delaware	71-0788538
(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization)	(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

20 Harvard Mill Square Wakefield, MA	01880-3209
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)	(Zip Code)

Registrant's telephone number including area code: (781) 246-3343

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  x    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934).

Large accelerated filer  ¨    Accelerated filer  ¨    Non-accelerated filer  x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934).    Yes  ¨    No  x

The number of shares of Common Stock of the Registrant, par value $.01 per share, outstanding at October 29, 2007 was 12,390,067.

EDGEWATER TECHNOLOGY, INC.

FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2007

INDEX

	Page
PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1 - Financial Statements
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of September 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006	3
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2007 and 2006	4
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2007 and 2006	5
Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements	6
Item 2 - Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Business Overview	23
Results for the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2007, Compared to Results for the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2006	24
Liquidity and Capital Resources	28
Acquisitions, Earnout Payments and Commitments	30
Off Balance Sheet Arrangements, Contractual Obligations and Contingent Liabilities and Commitments	31
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates	32
Recent Accounting Pronouncements	32
Risk Factors	33
Special Note Regarding Forward Looking Statements	37
Item 3 - Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	38
Item 4 - Controls and Procedures
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures	38
Changes in Controls and Procedures	38
PART II - OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1 - Legal Proceedings	39
Item 1A - Risk Factors	39
Item 2 - Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	39
Item 3 - Defaults upon Senior Securities	39
Item 4 - Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders	39
Item 5 - Other Information	39
Item 6 - Exhibits	39
Signatures	40

2

PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

EDGEWATER TECHNOLOGY, INC.

UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(In Thousands, Except Per Share Data)

	September 30, 2007			December 31, 2006
	(Unaudited)
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	7,749		$	9,833
Marketable securities		24,086			23,308
Accounts receivable, net1 of allowance of $350 and $318, respectively		14,854			10,883
Current portion of deferred income taxes		1,760			1,760
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		476			441
Total current assets		48,925			46,225
Property and equipment, net		4,861			3,391
Intangible assets, net		4,146			3,797
Goodwill		30,609			25,366
Deferred income taxes, net		15,346			16,789
Other assets		52			52
Total assets	$	103,939		$	95,620
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities	$	3,041		$	3,326
Accruals related to discontinued operations		30			588
Accrued payroll and related liabilities		4,397			4,242
Deferred revenue and other liabilities		959			252
Capital lease obligations, current		191			184
Total current liabilities		8,618			8,592
Capital lease obligations		691			778
Total liabilities		9,309			9,370
Commitments and contingencies (Note 12)
Stockholders’ equity:
Preferred stock, $.01 par value; 2,000 shares authorized, no shares issued or outstanding		—			—
Common stock, $.01 par value; 48,000 shares authorized, 29,736 shares issued as of September 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006, 12,338 and 11,522 shares outstanding as of September 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006, respectively		297			297
Paid-in capital		213,098			213,979
Treasury stock, at cost, 17,398 and 18,214 shares at September 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006, respectively		(130,642	)		(136,923	)
Retained earnings		11,877			8,897
Total stockholders’ equity		94,447			86,250
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	103,939		$	95,620

See notes to the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

¹ Includes related-party amounts of $1,593 and $31 as of September 30, 2007 and $1,407 and $4 as of December 31, 2006 due from The Synapse Group, Inc. and Loeb Enterprises, respectively.

3

EDGEWATER TECHNOLOGY, INC.

UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(In Thousands, Except Per Share Data)

	Three Months Ended September 30,				Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2007		2006		2007		2006
	(Unaudited)
Revenue:
Service revenue2	$	15,652	$	14,367	$	47,244	$	41,943
Software revenue		18		225		1,849		732
Reimbursable expenses		682		571		2,109		1,686
Total revenue		16,352		15,163		51,202		44,361
Cost of revenue:
Project and personnel costs **		8,724		7,872		26,264		24,377
Software costs		10		176		1,559		613
Reimbursable expenses		682		571		2,109		1,686
Total cost of revenue		9,416		8,619		29,932		26,676
Gross profit		6,936		6,544		21,270		17,685
Operating expenses:
Selling, general and administrative **		5,203		4,621		15,991		14,046
Depreciation and amortization		599		454		1,734		1,260
Total operating expenses		5,802		5,075		17,725		15,306
Operating income		1,134		1,469		3,545		2,379
Interest income, net		428		304		1,236		885
Income before income taxes		1,562		1,773		4,781		3,264
Provision for income taxes		465		709		1,801		1,305
Net income	$	1,097	$	1,064	$	2,980	$	1,959
Earnings per share:
Basic net income per share of common stock	$	0.09	$	0.10	$	0.26	$	0.18
Diluted net income per share of common stock	$	0.08	$	0.09	$	0.23	$	0.17
Shares used in computing basic net income per share of common stock		11,822		11,132		11,614		10,914
Shares used in computing diluted net income per share of common stock		13,134		11,659		13,172		11,868
** - The following amounts of stock-based compensation expense are included in each of the respective expense categories reported above:
Project and personnel costs	$	95	$	46	$	297	$	207
Selling, general and administrative		266		196		694		747
Total stock-based compensation	$	361	$	242	$	991	$	954

See notes to the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

² Includes related-party amounts of $1,593 and $42 for the three months ended September 30, 2007 and $2,071 and $0 for the three months ended September 30, 2006 from The Synapse Group, Inc. and Loeb Enterprises, respectively. Includes related-party amounts of $5,408 and $103 for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 and $6,544 and $47 for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 from The Synapse Group, Inc. and Loeb Enterprises, respectively.

4

EDGEWATER TECHNOLOGY, INC.

UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(In Thousands)

	Three Months Ended September 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2007			2006			2007			2006
	(Unaudited)
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net income	$	1,097		$	1,064		$	2,980		$	1,959
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities, net of acquisition:
Depreciation and amortization		599			454			1,734			1,260
Provision for doubtful accounts		25			100			101			177
Deferred income taxes		348			603			1,443			1,110
Stock-based compensation		361			242			991			954
Amortization of marketable securities premiums, net		(16	)		(147	)		(146	)		(275	)
Changes in operating accounts:
Accounts receivable		425			2,137			(3,459	)		(98	)
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		79			257			(35	)		626
Other assets		—			—			—			11
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities		(1,339	)		(2,466	)		(509	)		(274	)
Accrued payroll and related liabilities		562			155			(78	)		(2,399	)
Deferred revenue and other liabilities		(2	)		(193	)		707			(161	)
Net cash provided by operating activities		2,139			2,206			3,729			2,890
Net cash used in discontinued operating activities		(6	)		(22	)		(558	)		(115	)
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Redemptions of marketable securities		11,983			9,846			35,142			26,358
Purchases of marketable securities		(10,844	)		(8,707	)		(35,774	)		(14,889	)
Purchase of Alecian Corporation		(793	)		—			(793	)		—
Purchase of Lynx Business Intelligence Consulting, Inc.		(3,257	)		—			(3,257	)		—
Purchase of National Decision Systems, Inc., net of cash acquired, including payment under earnouts		—			(8	)		(709	)		(6,641	)
Purchase of Ranzal and Associates, including payments under earnouts		—			43			—			(2,686	)
Purchases of property and equipment		(300	)		(232	)		(2,236	)		(552	)
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities		(3,211	)		942			(7,627	)		1,590
CASH FLOW FROM FINANCING ACTIVITES:
Payments on capital leases		(46	)		—			(80	)		—
Proceeds from employee stock plans and stock option exercises		501			329			2,452			1,699
Net cash provided by financing activities		455			329			2,372			1,699
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents		(623	)		3,455			(2,084	)		6,064
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, beginning of period		8,372			8,834			9,833			6,225
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, end of period	$	7,749		$	12,289		$	7,749		$	12,289
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
Cash paid for income taxes	$	273		$	76		$	614		$	214
Cash receipts from related parties	$	1,374		$	2,180		$	5,388		$	6,556
Cash payments to related parties	$	—		$	62		$	628		$	185
NON-CASH FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Issuance of restricted stock awards	$	—		$	—		$	342		$	862
Issuance of common stock for acquisitions and earnouts (Note 7)	$	1,986		$	—		$	2,163		$	1,680
Shares surrendered to cover option exercise	$	—		$	—		$	1,070		$	—
Shares surrendered to cover option exercise income taxes	$	—		$	—		$	207		$	—

See notes to the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

5

EDGEWATER TECHNOLOGY, INC.

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

1. ORGANIZATION:

Edgewater Technology, Inc. is an innovative technology management consulting firm providing a unique blend of premium information technology (“IT”) services. We provide our clients with a range of business and technology offerings. Headquartered in Wakefield, Massachusetts, as of September 30, 2007, our Company employed approximately 274 consulting professionals throughout the United States.

In this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (the “Form 10-Q”), we use the terms “Edgewater, ” “Edgewater Technology,” “we,” “our Company,” “the Company,” “our” and “us” to refer to Edgewater Technology, Inc. and its wholly-owned subsidiaries. Our wholly-owned subsidiaries include:

• Edgewater Technology (Delaware), Inc. (“Edgewater Delaware”), a Delaware corporation that was incorporated in 1992 and acquired by our Company on May 17, 1999;

• Edgewater Technology-Ranzal, Inc. (formerly known as Ranzal and Associates, Inc. and referred to in this Form 10-Q as “Ranzal”), a Delaware corporation that was formed in 2004 to acquire certain assets of Ranzal on October 4, 2004;

• Edgewater New York Metro, Inc. (formerly known as National Decision Systems, Inc. and referred to in this Form 10-Q as “NDS”), a New Jersey corporation that was acquired by our Company on February 15, 2006 (the “NDS Acquisition”); and

• Edgewater Technology-Lynx, Inc. (formerly known as Lynx Business Intelligence Consulting, Inc. and referred to in this Form 10-Q as “Lynx”), a Delaware corporation that was formed in September 2007 to acquire certain assets of Lynx on September 24, 2007 (the “Lynx Acquisition”).

2. BASIS OF PRESENTATION:

The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared by Edgewater Technology pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) regarding interim financial reporting. Certain information and note disclosures normally included in annual financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America have been omitted pursuant to those rules and regulations, although we believe that the disclosures made are adequate to ensure the information presented is not misleading.

The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements reflect all adjustments (which were of a normal, recurring nature) that, in the opinion of management, are necessary to present fairly our financial position, results of operations and cash flows as of and for the interim periods presented. All intercompany transactions have been eliminated in the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements. These financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited financial statements and notes thereto included in our 2006 Annual Report on Form 10-K as filed with the SEC on March 14, 2007.

The results of operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for any future period or the full fiscal year. Our revenue and earnings may fluctuate from quarter-to-quarter based on factors within and outside our control, including variability in demand for information technology professional services, the length of the sales cycle associated with our service offerings, the number, size and scope of our projects and the efficiency with which we utilize our employees.

3. REVENUE RECOGNITION AND ALLOWANCE FOR DOUBTFUL ACCOUNTS:

Our Company recognizes revenue from providing IT and management consulting services under written service contracts with our customers. The service contracts we enter into generally fall into three specific categories: time and materials, fixed-price and fixed-fee. Our revenues are generated from sources such as technical consulting (inclusive of design, application development, systems integration and infrastructure services such as assessment and remediation and IT due diligence), Corporate Performance Management consulting (analytics, Business Intelligence and data services such as data integration/ETL, data management and data warehousing) and business consulting engagements (business process improvement, high-level program management offerings, mergers and acquisitions consulting and strategy). Revenue from these services is recognized as the services are performed and amounts are earned. We consider amounts to be earned once

6

EDGEWATER TECHNOLOGY, INC.

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

3. REVENUE RECOGNITION AND ALLOWANCE FOR DOUBTFUL ACCOUNTS (Continued):

evidence of an arrangement has been obtained, services are delivered, fees are fixed or determinable and collectibility is reasonably assured. Edgewater engages in business activities under one operating segment, premium IT services, which combines strategic consulting, technical knowledge and industry-domain expertise to develop custom business process and technology solutions.

For the three- and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2007 and 2006, revenue generated, by service offerings, under our one operating segment were as follows:

	Technical Consulting Engagements		Corporate Performance Management Consulting Engagements		Business Consulting Engagements
Three months ended September 30:
2007	55.9	%	30.2	%	13.9	%
2006	58.8	%	27.4	%	13.8	%
Nine months ended September 30:
2007	59.2	%	27.6	%	13.2	%
2006	62.1	%	24.1	%	13.8	%

The Company derives a significant portion of its service revenue from time and materials-based contracts. Time and materials-based contracts represented 93.9% and 94.9% of service revenue for the three- and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2007, respectively. Time and materials-based contracts represented 91.9% and 87.6% of service revenue for the three- and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2006, respectively. Revenue under time and materials contracts is recognized as services are rendered and performed at contractually agreed upon rates.

Revenue pursuant to fixed-price contracts is recognized under the proportional performance method of accounting. Fixed-price contracts represented 4.0% and 2.5% of service revenue for the three- and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2007, respectively. Fixed-price contracts represented 2.1% and 6.3% of service revenue for the three- and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2006, respectively. Over the course of a fixed-price contract, we routinely evaluate whether revenue and profitability should be recognized in the current period. We recognize revenue utilizing the proportional performance method of accounting. We estimate the proportional performance on our fixed-price contracts on a monthly basis utilizing hours incurred to date as a percentage of total estimated hours to complete the project. If we do not have a sufficient basis to measure progress toward completion, revenue is recognized upon completion of performance, subject to any warranty provisions or other project management assessments as to the status of work performed. This method is used because reasonably dependable estimates of revenue and costs can be made, based on historical experience and milestones identified in any particular contract.

Typically, the Company provides warranty services on its fixed-price contracts related to providing customers with the ability to have any “design flaws” remedied and/or have our Company “fix” routine defects. The warranty services, as outlined in the respective contracts, are provided for a specific period of time after a project is complete. The Company values the warranty services based upon historical labor hours incurred for similar services at standard billing rates. In accordance with Securities and Exchange Commission Staff Accounting Bulletin (“SAB”) SAB No. 104, “Revenue Recognition” (“SAB 104”), revenue related to the warranty provisions within our fixed-price contracts is recognized as the services are performed and the revenue is earned. The warranty term is typically short term or for a 60 day period or less after the project is complete.

7

EDGEWATER TECHNOLOGY, INC.

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

3. REVENUE RECOGNITION AND ALLOWANCE FOR DOUBTFUL ACCOUNTS (Continued):

In the event we are unable to accurately estimate the resources required or the scope of work to be performed on a fixed-price contract, or we do not manage the project properly within the planned time period, then we may recognize a loss on a contract. Provisions for estimated losses on uncompleted projects are made on a contract-by-contract basis. Any known or probable losses on projects are charged to operations in the period in which such losses are determined. A formal project review process takes place quarterly, although most projects are evaluated on an ongoing basis. Management reviews the estimated total direct costs on each contract to determine if the estimated amounts are accurate, and estimates are adjusted as needed in the period revised estimates are made. None of our fixed-price contracts were deemed to be loss contracts during the three- and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2007. We recognized insignificant losses on certain fixed-price contracts during the three- and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2006.

We also perform services on a fixed-fee basis under infrastructure service contracts, which include monthly hosting and support services. Our fixed-fee engagements are different from our fixed-price engagements in so far as services are retained on a monthly basis and there is typically a set minimum charge for work being performed. In the event additional services are required, above the minimum retained or contracted amount, then such services are billed on a time and materials basis. Fixed-fee contracts represented 2.1% and 2.6% of service revenue for the three- and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2007, respectively. Fixed-fee contracts represented 6.0% and 6.1% of service revenue for the three- and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2006, respectively. Revenue under fixed-fee contracts are recognized as fixed monthly amounts, for a specified period of time, as outlined within the respective contract.

When a customer enters into a time and materials, fixed-price or fixed-fee contract, the related revenue is accounted for under SAB 104 and Emerging Issues Task Force Abstract (“EITF”) No. 00-21, “Revenue Arrangement with Multiple Deliverables” (“EITF No. 00-21”). For all arrangements, we evaluate the deliverables in each contract to determine whether they represent separate units of accounting. If the deliverables represent separate units of accounting, we then measure and allocate the consideration from the arrangement to the separate units, based on reliable evidence of the fair value of each deliverable.

Client prepayments, even if nonrefundable, are deferred (classified as a liability) and recognized over future periods as services are performed. As of September 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006, the Company has recorded a deferred liability of approximately $144 thousand and $84 thousand, respectively, which is included in the financial statement caption of “deferred revenue and other liabilities” related to customer prepayments.

Software revenue represents the resale of certain third-party off-the-shelf software and is recorded on a gross basis provided we act as a principal in the transaction, whereby we have credit risk and we set the price to the end user. In the event we do not meet the requirements to be considered a principal in the software sale transaction and act as an agent, software revenue will be recorded on a net basis. Revenue from software resale arrangements represented 0.1% and 3.6% of total revenue for the three- and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2007, respectively. Revenue from software resale arrangements represented 1.5% and 1.7% of total revenue for the three- and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2006, respectively. Revenue and related costs are recognized and amounts are invoiced upon the customer’s constructive receipt of purchased software. All related warranty and maintenance arrangements are performed by the primary software vendor and are not the obligation of the Company.

8

EDGEWATER TECHNOLOGY, INC.

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

3. REVENUE RECOGNITION AND ALLOWANCE FOR DOUBTFUL ACCOUNTS (Continued):

We recognize revenue for services where the collection from the client is probable and our fees are fixed or determinable. We establish billing terms at the time at which the project deliverables and milestones are agreed. Our standard payment terms are 30 days from invoice date. Out-of-pocket reimbursable expenses charged to customers are reflected as revenue.

Our revenue and earnings may fluctuate from quarter-to-quarter based on the number, size and scope of projects in which we are engaged, the contractual terms and degree of completion of such projects, any delays incurred in connection with a project, employee utilization rates, the adequacy of provisions for losses, the use of estimates of resources required to complete ongoing projects, general economic conditions and other factors. Certain significant estimates include those used for fixed-price contracts, such as deferrals related to our volume purchase agreements, warranty holdbacks, and allocations of fair value of elements under multiple element arrangements, and the valuation of our allowance for doubtful accounts.

The Company maintains an allowance for doubtful accounts related to its accounts receivables that have been deemed to have a high risk of collectibility. Management reviews its accounts receivables on a monthly basis to determine if any receivables will potentially be uncollectible. Management further analyzes historical collection trends and changes in its customer payment patterns, customer concentration, and credit worthiness when evaluating the adequacy of its allowance for doubtful accounts. The Company includes any receivable balances that are determined to be uncollectible, along with a general reserve, in its overall allowance for doubtful accounts. Based on the information available, management believes the allowance for doubtful accounts is adequate; however future write-offs could exceed the recorded allowance.

4. STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION:

Overview

The Company accounts for stock-based compensation in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 123R, “Share-Based Payment” (“SFAS No. 123R”). This statement is a revision of SFAS No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation” and supersedes Accounting Principles Board Opinion (“APB”) No. 25, “Accounting for Stock issued to Employees.” SFAS No. 123R focuses primarily on accounting for transactions in which an entity obtains employee services in share-based payment transactions. The statement requires entities to recognize compensation expense from all share-based payment transactions in the financial statements. SFAS No. 123R establishes fair value as the measurement objective in accounting for share-based payment arrangements and requires all companies to apply a fair-value-based measurement method in accounting for generally all share-based payment transactions with employees.

Share-Based Compensation Plans

The Company has three share-based compensation plans which are described below; the Amended and Restated 1996 Stock Option Plan (“1996 Plan”), the Amended and Restated 2000 Stock Option Plan (“2000 Plan”) and the 2003 Equity Incentive Plan (“2003 Plan”), collectively the “Equity Plans.”

9

EDGEWATER TECHNOLOGY, INC.

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

4. STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION (Continued):

As of September 30, 2007, there were 76,901 and 14,850 shares available for future grant under the 2000 Plan and 2003 Plan, respectively. No shares were available for issuance under the 1996 Plan, as it expired on June 30, 2006.

Option Plans (Excluding Restricted Share Awards)

During the three- and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2007, the Company granted 28,000 and 500,350 stock options, respectively (excluding issuances of restricted share awards issued under the 2003 Plan), principally as part of the annual performance review process. No stock options were granted by the Company during the three-month period ended September 30, 2006. The Company granted 415,083 stock options (excluding issuances of restricted share awards issued under the 2003 Plan) during the nine-month period ended September 30, 2006, principally as part of the annual performance review process. The fair value of each option award is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Sholes option valuation model that uses the assumptions noted in the following table. Expected volatility is based upon historical volatility of the Company’s common stock. The expected life (estimated period of time outstanding) was estimated using the historical exercise behavior of employees. The risk-free interest rate is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant. The Company applied an estimated forfeiture rate of 26.5% to the calculated fair value of each option. The applied forfeiture rate utilized by the Company was based upon the historical forfeiture experience of the Equity Plans.

	Three Months Ended September 30,				Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2007		2006		2007		2006
Expected volatility	43.6% –43.	9%	—	%	43.6% –44.	6%	45.8% –46.	3%
Expected dividend yield		0%	—	%		0%		0%
Expected life (in years)	3.89 – 3.93		—		3.76 – 3.95		3.99 – 4.12
Risk-free interest rate	4.2% –5.	1%	—	%	4.2% –5.	1%	4.6% –5.	0%

The weighted-average grant-date fair value of all options granted (excluding restricted share awards) during the three-and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2007, as valued under SFAS No. 123R, was $3.32 and $3.57, respectively. The weighted-average grant-date fair value of all options granted (excluding restricted share awards) during the nine-month period ended September 30, 2006, as valued under SFAS No. 123R, was $2.73.

10

EDGEWATER TECHNOLOGY, INC.

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

4. STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION (Continued):

A summary of stock option activity under the Equity Plans (excluding restricted share awards) as of September 30, 2007, and changes during the quarter then ended is presented below:

Stock Options:	Shares Under Options		Weighted Average Exercise Price Per Share		Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Term (Years)	Aggregate Intrinsic Value
						(000’s)
Outstanding at January 1, 2007	4,093,314		$	5.70	4.80	$	2,624
Granted	3,000			7.75
Exercised	(261,149	)		5.10
Forfeited or expired	(27,098	)		9.09
Outstanding at March 31, 2007	3,808,067		$	5.72	4.60	$	10,616
Granted	469,350			8.96
Exercised	(252,964	)		5.80
Forfeited or expired	(71,668	)		8.43
Outstanding at June 30, 2007	3,952,785		$	6.05	4.90	$	8,005
Granted	28,000			8.38
Exercised	(76,188	)		5.08
Forfeited or expired	(9,194	)		8.51
Outstanding at September 30, 2007	3,895,403		$	6.08	4.60	$	10,606
Vested and expected to vest at September 30, 2007	3,666,257		$	5.98	4.31	$	10,322
Exercisable at September 30, 2007	3,032,006		$	5.64	3.71	$	9,531

The total intrinsic value of stock options exercised during the three- and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2007 was approximately $252 thousand and $1.8 million, respectively. The total intrinsic value of stock options exercised during the three- and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2006 was approximately $53 thousand and $665 thousand, respectively.

2003 Equity Incentive Plan – Restricted Share Awards

The 2003 Plan also authorizes the granting of restricted share awards to officers, employees and certain non-employee members of the Board of Directors. Restricted share awards are made at prices determined by the Compensation Committee of the Company’s Board of Directors (the “Compensation Committee”) and are compensatory in nature. Employees granted restricted share awards are required to provide consideration for the shares at the share price set by the Compensation Committee. Shares of restricted stock generally vest over a five-year period, during which time the Company has the right to repurchase any unvested shares at the amount paid if the relationship between the employee and the Company ceases. 261,420 restricted share awards were subject to repurchase by the Company under the restricted stock agreements as of September 30, 2007. The Company records compensation expense related to restricted share awards on a straight-line basis over the vesting term of the award.

No restricted share awards were issued by the Company during the three-month periods ended September 30, 2007 and 2006. The Company issued 37,800 and 136,400 restricted share awards to employees during the nine-month periods ended September 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively, at a purchase price of $0.01 per share.

11

EDGEWATER TECHNOLOGY, INC.

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

4. STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION (Continued):

A summary of non-vested restricted share activity under the 2003 Plan as of September 30, 2007, and changes during the quarter then ended is presented below:

Restricted Share Awards:	Non-vested Restricted Shares		Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value
Outstanding at January 1, 2007	297,400		$	5.51
Granted	—			—
Vested	(25,280	)		6.23
Forfeited or expired	—			—
Outstanding at March 31, 2007	272,120		$	5.44
Granted	37,800			9.06
Vested	(42,250	)		4.68
Forfeited or expired	—
Outstanding at June 30, 2007	267,670		$	6.07
Granted	—			—
Vested	(6,250	)		5.32
Forfeited or expired	—			—
Outstanding at September 30, 2007	261,420		$	6.09
Vested and expected to vest at September 30, 2007	261,420

The total fair value of stock awards vested during the three- and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2007 was $33 thousand and $389 thousand, respectively. The total fair value of stock awards vested during the three- and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2006 was $33 thousand and $216 thousand, respectively.

Employee Stock Purchase Plan

The Edgewater Technology, Inc. Employee Stock Purchase Plan (“ESPP”) offers eligible employees the option to purchase the Company’s Common Stock at 85% of the lower of the closing price, as quoted on NASDAQ, on either the first trading day or the last trading day of the quarterly purchase period. Enrollment periods occur on January 1 and July 1. Purchases occur every three months. The amount each employee can purchase is limited to the lesser of (i) 10% of an employees annual base salary or (ii) $25,000 of stock value on an annual basis. The ESPP is designed to qualify for certain tax benefits for employees under section 423 of the Internal Revenue Code. The ESPP allows a maximum of 700,000 shares to be purchased by employees and as of September 30, 2007, approximately 134,389 shares were available for future issuance.

The fair value of each ESPP offering was estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Sholes option valuation model that uses the assumptions noted in the following table. The risk-free interest rate is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant. Expected volatility was based on historical volatility and other factors.

	July 2007 ESPP Offering		April 2007 ESPP Offering		January 2007 ESPP Offering
Expected volatility	43.8	%	44.3	%	44.8	%
Expected dividend yield	—	%	—	%	—	%
Expected life (in years)	1.67		1.67		1.67
Risk-free interest rate	4.0	%	4.5	%	4.7	%

12

EDGEWATER TECHNOLOGY, INC.

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

4. STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION (Continued):

The issue price of the shares of the Company’s common stock issued under the July 2007, April 2007 and January 2007 ESPP offering was $6.70, $5.17 and $4.85 per share, respectively, and the related weighted-average fair value of the compensation elements of the shares, based upon the assumptions in the preceding table, was $2.56, $3.95 and $2.18 per share, respectively.

Compensation Expense

Stock-based compensation expense under all of the Company’s share-based plans was $361 thousand and $991 thousand in the three- and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2007, respectively. Stock-based compensation expense under all of the Company’s share-based plans was $242 thousand and $954 thousand in the three- and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2006, respectively.

As of September 30, 2007, unrecognized compensation expense, net of estimated forfeitures, related to the unvested portion of all share-based compensation arrangements was approximately $3.0 million and is expected to be recognized over a period of 5.5 years.

The Company is using previously purchased treasury shares for all shares issued for options, restricted share awards and ESPP purchases. Shares may also be issued from unissued share reserves.

5. INCOME TAXES:

Income Tax Provision: In determining our current income tax provision, we assess temporary differences resulting from different treatments of items for tax and accounting purposes. These differences result in deferred tax assets and liabilities, which are recorded in our consolidated balance sheets. A valuation allowance is provided to the extent tax assets are not likely to be recovered. The valuation allowance was established due to uncertainties related to the Company’s ability to utilize some of its deferred tax assets, primarily consisting of certain net operating losses carried forward and foreign tax credits, before they expire. The Company considers scheduled reversals of deferred tax liabilities, projected future taxable income, ongoing tax planning strategies and other matters, including the period over which our deferred tax assets will be recoverable, in assessing the need for and the amount of the valuation allowance. In the event that actual results differ from these estimates or we adjust these estimates in future periods, an adjustment to the valuation allowance may be recorded, which could materially impact our financial position and net income (loss) in the period of the adjustment.

We have recorded a $6.5 million valuation allowance against our $23.6 million gross deferred tax assets as of September 30, 2007. During the third quarter of 2007, the Company reduced its valuation allowance by $106 thousand in connection with the recognition of certain deferred tax assets in accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 123R. During the six-month period ended June 30, 2007, prior to this evaluation, the Company recorded a valuation allowance against the full value of these deferred tax assets. As a result of its review, the Company determined that it was more than likely that it would be able to derive future benefit from the deferred tax assets and accordingly reduced the valuation allowance previously recorded against these tax assets.

13

EDGEWATER TECHNOLOGY, INC.

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

5. INCOME TAXES (Continued):

The Company recorded a tax provision of $0.5 million and $1.8 million for the three- and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2007, respectively. The Company recorded a tax provision of $0.7 million and $1.3 million for the three- and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2006, respectively. The income tax provision for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007 represents tax expense based on an effective income tax rate of 29.8% and 37.7%, respectively. Income tax expense in both periods represented tax expense calculated at our projected effective income tax rate of 41.5%, offset by a tax benefit of $0.2 million in connection with the Company’s recognition certain tax benefits under SFAS No. 123R. The effective tax rate applied to income before taxes in the three- and nine-month periods of 2006 was 40.0%. The Company does not anticipate having to expend cash for any federal income taxes, exclusive of alternative minimum tax, in 2007 because of the availability of our net operating loss carryforwards.

FIN No. 48: In July 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued FASB Interpretation (“FIN”) No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes—An Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109” (“FIN No. 48”). FIN No. 48 clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in an enterprise’s financial statements in accordance with FASB Statement No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes.” FIN No. 48 also prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return and provides guidance on derecognition, classification, interest and penalties, and accounting in interim periods, disclosure, and transition. The provisions of FIN No. 48 are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006.

The evaluation of a tax position in accordance with FIN No. 48 is a two-step process. The first step is a recognition process whereby the enterprise determines whether a tax position is “more-likely-than–not” to be sustained upon examination, including resolution of any related appeals or litigation processes, based on the technical merits of the position. In evaluating whether a tax position has met the more-likely-than-not recognition threshold, the enterprise should presume that the position will be examined by the appropriate taxing authority that has full knowledge of all relevant information. The second step is a measurement process whereby a tax position that meets the more-likely-than-not recognition threshold is calculated to determine the amount of benefit to recognize in the financial statements. The tax position is measured at the largest amount of benefit that is greater than 50% likely of being realized upon ultimate settlement.

The Company adopted the provisions of FIN No. 48 on January 1, 2007. We recognized no material adjustments in the liability for unrecognized income tax benefits as a result of our adoption. We did not have any unrecognized tax benefits and did not have any interest or penalties accrued at the time of adoption. Additionally, the Company, based upon a review of our federal and state tax positions, did not record any income tax expense adjustments due to changes in uncertain tax positions during the three- and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2007.

We are subject to U.S. federal tax as well as income tax in multiple states and local jurisdictions. The Company’s 2003, 2004, 2005 and 2006 tax years are subject to examination by these tax authorities. To our best knowledge we are no longer subject to U.S. federal and state and local tax examinations by tax authorities for years before 2002. Such examinations could result in challenges to tax positions taken and, accordingly, we may record adjustments to provisions based on the outcomes of such matters. However, we believe that the resolution of these matters will not have a material effect on our financial position or results of operations.

Our continuing practice is to recognize interest and penalties related to income tax matters as a selling, general and administrative expense.

14

EDGEWATER TECHNOLOGY, INC.

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

6. MARKETABLE SECURITIES:

All marketable securities that have original maturities greater than three months, but less than one year, are considered to be current marketable securities. Our marketable securities are classified as held-to-maturity securities, which are recorded at amortized cost and consist of marketable instruments, which include but are not limited to corporate bonds and commercial paper.

As of September 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006, the amortized cost and fair value of our marketable securities consisted of the following:

	September 30, 2007
	Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized Losses		Fair Value
Commercial paper	$	16,103	$	37	$	—	$	16,140
Corporate bonds		7,983		—		—		7,983
Total marketable securities	$	24,086	$	37	$	—	$	24,123
	December 31, 2006
	Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized Losses		Fair Value
Commercial paper	$	17,504	$	9	$	—	$	17,513
Corporate bonds		5,804		—		—		5,804
Total marketable securities	$	23,308	$	9	$	—	$	23,317

Amortization expense related to the net discounts and premiums on our held-to-maturity securities was $0.02 million and $0.1 million for the three- and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2007, respectively.

7. BUSINESS COMBINATIONS:

Acquisition of Alecian Corporation: On July 2, 2007, the Company acquired certain assets and liabilities of Alecian Corporation (“Alecian”), pursuant to the terms of a definitive Asset Purchase Agreement (the “Alecian Acquisition”). Alecian, which is located in Westport, Connecticut, provides its customers with technology solutions that assist with strategic and operational management decisions within today’s stringent reporting and regulatory environment. The acquisition enhanced Edgewater’s Corporate Performance Management (“CPM”) practice. The Company paid to the shareholders of Alecian total cash consideration of $500 thousand at closing. The Company incurred $293 thousand of direct acquisition costs.

The Company has engaged an independent third-party valuation firm to assist with the allocation of the purchase price between assets, liabilities and identified intangible assets. The initial allocation of the purchase price was as follows:

	Total		Life (In Years)
	(In Thousands)
Net book value of assets and liabilities acquired	$	24
Acquired intangible assets		270	4 to 5 Years
Goodwill (deductible for tax purposes under Section 197 of the IRS Code)		499
Total purchase price	$	793

In addition, an earnout agreement was entered into in connection with the Alecian Acquisition, and it specifies additional earnout consideration that could be payable to the former Alecian stockholders. Earnout payments are conditioned upon the attainment of certain performance measurements for the Alecian business over a 12-month period from the date of the acquisition. Assuming all performance measurements are met within the predetermined performance ranges, additional earnout consideration of approximately $1.0 million would be payable to the shareholders of Alecian.

The Alecian Acquisition was accounted for as a purchase transaction, and accordingly, the results of operations, commencing from the acquisition date of July 2, 2007, are included in the Company’s accompanying consolidated statements of operations. Pro forma financial information related to the Alecian Acquisition was not presented as the effect of this acquisition was not material to the Company.

15

EDGEWATER TECHNOLOGY, INC.

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

7. BUSINESS COMBINATIONS (Continued):

Acquisition of Lynx Business Intelligence Consulting, Inc.: On September 24, 2007, the Company acquired certain assets and liabilities of Lynx Business Intelligence Consulting, Inc. (“Lynx”), pursuant to the terms of an Asset Purchase Agreement (the “Lynx Acquisition”). Lynx is a leading provider of professional consulting services in the CPM / Business Intelligence (“BI”) industry and is located in Buena Park, California. The acquisition expanded Edgewater’s CPM/BI service offerings and will expand the Company’s geographical footprint to the West Coast. The Company paid to the shareholder of Lynx total consideration of approximately $5.0 million, consisting of an initial upfront payment at closing of approximately $3.0 million in cash and 233,599 shares, valued at approximately $2.0 million, of Edgewater’s common stock, $0.01 par value per share (“Common Stock”), which is subject to a three-year lock-up agreement. The Company incurred $303 thousand of direct acquisition costs.

The Company has engaged an independent third-party valuation firm to assist with the allocation of the purchase price between assets, liabilities and identified intangible assets. The initial allocation of the purchase price was as follows:

	Total		Life (In Years)
	(In Thousands)
Net book value of assets and liabilities acquired	$	355
Acquired intangible asset		1,030	4 -5 Years
Goodwill (deductible for tax purposes under Section 197 of the IRS Code)		3,858
Total purchase price	$	5,243

In addition, an agreement was entered into in connection with the Lynx Acquisition, and it specifies additional earnout consideration that could be payable to the former Lynx stockholders. Earnout payments are conditioned upon the attainment of certain performance measurements for the Lynx business over a 12 to 24 month period from the date of the acquisition. Assuming all performance measurements are met within the predetermined performance ranges, additional earnout consideration of approximately $0.5 million would be payable, in cash, to the former shareholder of Lynx.

The Lynx Acquisition was accounted for as a purchase transaction, and accordingly, the results of operations, commencing from the acquisition date of September 24, 2007, are included in the Company’s accompanying consolidated statements of operations. Pro forma financial information related to the Lynx Acquisition was not presented as the effect of this acquisition was not material to the Company.

Acquisition of National Decision Systems, Inc.: On February 15, 2006, the Company acquired all of the outstanding capital stock of NDS, pursuant to the terms of a Stock Purchase Agreement. NDS provides Business Process Improvement, Program Management and Merger and Acquisition consulting services and is located in Stamford, CT. The acquisition expanded Edgewater Technology’s service offerings and will provide a gateway into the New York/New Jersey market. The Company paid to the shareholders of NDS total consideration of approximately $10.2 million, consisting of an initial upfront payment at closing of approximately $7.1 million in cash, $1.4 million in assumed liabilities and 264,610 shares, valued at approximately $1.7 million, of Edgewater Technology’s common stock, $0.01 par value per share (“Common Stock”), which is subject to a three-year lock-up agreement. The Company incurred $0.7 million of direct acquisition costs.

The Company engaged an independent third-party valuation firm to assist with the allocation of the purchase price between assets, liabilities and identified intangible assets. The initial allocation of the purchase price was as follows:

	Total		Life (In Years)
	(In Thousands)
Net book value of assets and liabilities acquired	$	336
Acquired intangible asset		3,500	4 Years
Goodwill (not deductible for tax purposes)		7,109
Total purchase price	$	10,945

In connection with the NDS Acquisition, the Company established a $1.4 million deferred tax liability, which reduced the carrying value of the Company’s net deferred tax assets. The NDS Acquisition was a stock purchase, and accordingly, the Company does not have a tax basis in the identified intangible assets recorded as part of the NDS Acquisition. In accordance with SFAS No. 141, “Business Combinations,” the establishment of the deferred tax liability resulted in an increase to the Company’s goodwill asset.

16

EDGEWATER TECHNOLOGY, INC.

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

7. BUSINESS COMBINATIONS (Continued):

In addition, an earnout agreement was entered into in connection with the NDS Acquisition, and it specifies additional earnout consideration that could be payable to the former NDS stockholders. Earnout payments are conditioned upon the attainment of certain performance measurements for the NDS business over a 12 to 24 month period from the date of the acquisition. On February 15, 2007, the former NDS stockholders completed the first of two twelve month earnout periods, during which the required minimum performance measurements were achieved. During the first quarter of 2007, the Company accrued $886 thousand payable to the former NDS stockholders directly related to the completion of the first earnout period. In April 2007, $709 thousand of the contingent earnout consideration was paid in cash and $177 thousand was settled through the issuance of 21,751 shares of Common Stock. The contingent earnout consideration paid to the former NDS stockholders was reported as an increase in goodwill in the Company’s balance sheet during the first quarter of 2007. The Company may have to pay additional earnout consideration to the former NDS stockholders in the future and such additional earnout could be similar to the first earnout payments.

The NDS acquisition was accounted for as a purchase transaction, and accordingly, the results of operations, commencing from the acquisition date of February 15, 2006, are included in the Company’s accompanying consolidated statements of operations. Pro forma financial information related to the NDS acquisition was not presented as the effect of this acquisition was not material to the Company.

8. GOODWILL AND INTANGIBLE ASSETS:

Under SFAS No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets” (“SFAS No. 142”), goodwill and certain intangible assets are deemed to have indefinite lives and are no longer amortized, but are reviewed at least annually for impairment. Other identifiable intangible assets are amortized over their estimated useful lives. SFAS No. 142 requires that goodwill be tested for impairment at the reporting unit level upon adoption and at least annually thereafter, utilizing the “fair value” methodology. The Company evaluates the fair value of its reporting unit utilizing various valuation techniques and engages an outside valuation firm to provide valuation analysis each year on December 2, which is our selected annual measurement date.

Our net goodwill as of September 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006 was $30.6 million and $25.4 million, respectively. The increase in goodwill from December 31, 2006 was directly related to the combined effect of the contingent earnout consideration payable to the former stockholders of NDS in connection with the completion of NDS’ first earnout period, which ended on February 15, 2007, and the goodwill recognized in connection with the Alecian Acquisition and Lynx Acquisition, which are more fully described in Note 7.

Other net intangibles amounted to $4.1 million and $3.8 million as of September 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006, respectively. The current year increase in the net intangible value is a result of the addition of estimated identified intangible assets of $270 thousand and $1.0 million in connection with the Alecian and Lynx acquisitions, respectively, which are described in Note 7. The current year additions were offset by amortization of $1.0 million during the nine-month period ended September 30, 2007.

17

EDGEWATER TECHNOLOGY, INC.

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

8. GOODWILL AND INTANGIBLE ASSETS (Continued):

Goodwill and intangible assets consisted of the following as of:

	September 30, 2007						December 31, 2006
	Goodwill		Other Intangibles		Total		Goodwill		Other Intangibles		Total
	(In Thousands)
Cost basis	$	39,729	$	8,560	$	48,289	$	34,486	$	7,260	$	41,746
Less: Accumulated amortization		9,120		4,414		13,534		9,120		3,463		12,583
Net reported value	$	30,609	$	4,146	$	34,755	$	25,366	$	3,797	$	29,163

Total amortization expense was $324 thousand and $951 thousand during the three- and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2007, respectively. Total amortization expense was $327 thousand and $871 thousand during the three- and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2006, respectively. This amortization expense relates to certain non-competition covenants and customer lists, which will expire from 2007 through 2012.

9. CAPITAL LEASE OBLIGATIONS:

In December 2006, the Company entered into lease financing arrangements (the “Capital Lease Arrangements”) with a bank related to certain property and equipment. Payments under the Capital Lease Arrangements are to be made over a period of 48 to 60 months and have a blended interest rate of 6.03% per annum on the outstanding principal balances. As of September 30, 2007, our outstanding obligations under our Capital Lease Arrangements totaled $882 thousand. Of this amount, $191 thousand, which is due and payable within the next twelve months, has been classified as a current capital lease obligation in the accompanying balance sheet.

During the three- and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2007, the Company made payments of principal and interest totaling $46 thousand and $80 thousand, respectively under the Capital Lease Arrangements. No payments related to capital lease obligations were made during the three- and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2006.

18

EDGEWATER TECHNOLOGY, INC.

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

10. EARNINGS PER SHARE:

A reconciliation of net income and weighted average shares used in computing basic and diluted earnings per share is as follows:

	Three Months Ended September 30,				Nine Months Ended September 30,
	(In Thousands, Except Per Share Data)
	2007		2006		2007		2006
Basic earnings per share:
Net income applicable to common shares	$	1,097	$	1,064	$	2,980	$	1,959
Weighted average common shares outstanding		11,822		11,132		11,614		10,914
Basic income per share of common stock	$	0.09	$	0.10	$	0.26	$	0.18
Diluted earnings per share:
Net income applicable to common shares	$	1,097	$	1,064	$	2,980	$	1,959
Weighted average common shares outstanding		11,822		11,132		11,614		10,914
Dilutive effect of stock options		1,312		527		1,558		954
Weighted average common shares, assuming dilutive effect of stock options		13,134		11,659		13,172		11,868
Diluted earnings per share of common stock	$	0.08	$	0.09	$	0.23	$	0.17

Share-based awards, inclusive of all grants made under the Company’s Equity Plans, for which either the stock option exercise price, or the fair value of the restricted share award, exceeds the average market price over the period, have an anti-dilutive effect on earnings per share, and accordingly, are excluded from the diluted computations for all periods presented. Had such shares been included, shares for the diluted computation would have increased by approximately 0.4 million and 0.3 million in the three- and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2007. The diluted computation would have increased by approximately 1.8 million and 0.3 million for the three- and nine-month period ended September 30, 2006, respectively. As of September 30, 2007 and 2006, there were approximately 4.2 million and 4.5 million share-based awards outstanding under the Company’s Equity Plans, respectively.

11. RELATED PARTIES:

Synapse. The Synapse Group, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of Time Warner, (“Synapse”) is considered a related party as its former President and Chief Executive Officer, Michael Loeb, is also a member of our Board of Directors. Mr. Loeb, (1) controlled Synapse prior to its sale to Time Warner in 2001, and (2) resigned as the President and Chief Executive Officer of Synapse during 2005 and (3) remains a member of Synapse’s board of directors. Mr. Loeb joined Edgewater’s Board of Directors in April 2000. Synapse has been an Edgewater Technology customer since 1996. Service revenue from Synapse amounted to $1.6 million and $5.4 million in the three- and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2007, respectively. Service revenue from Synapse amounted to $2.1 million and $6.5 million in the three- and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2006, respectively. Accounts receivable balances from Synapse were $1.6 million and $1.4 million as of September 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006, respectively, which amounts were on customary business terms. The Company provides services to Synapse related to infrastructure services, custom software development and systems integration. Services are provided on both a fixed-fee and time and materials basis. Our contracts with Synapse, including all terms and conditions, have been negotiated on an arm’s length basis and on market terms similar to those we have with our other customers. In January of 2007, our Company entered into a new one-year service contract with Synapse. It is anticipated that Synapse will purchase approximately $7.0 million in professional services during fiscal 2007. There are no commitments beyond the twelve-month term of the agreement.

19

EDGEWATER TECHNOLOGY, INC.

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

11. RELATED PARTIES (Continued):

Loeb Enterprises. Loeb Enterprises is considered a related party as its founder and President is Michael Loeb. Mr. Loeb is a member of our Board of Directors. Loeb Enterprises has been an Edgewater Technology customer since 2006. Service revenue from Loeb Enterprises amounted to $42 thousand and $103 thousand in the three- and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2007, respectively. The Company did not report any service revenue from Loeb Enterprises during the three-month period ended September 30, 2006. Service revenue from Loeb Enterprises amounted to $47 thousand for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2006. Accounts receivable balances from Loeb Enterprises were $31 thousand and $4 thousand as of September 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006, respectively, which amounts were on customary business terms. The Company provides Loeb Enterprises with hosting and support services. These services are provided on both a fixed-fee and time and materials basis. Our contracts with Loeb Enterprises, including all terms and conditions, have been negotiated on an arm’s length basis and on market terms similar to those we have with our other customers.

Lease Agreement. Our Company entered into a lease agreement in 1999 (the “Original Lease”), which was modified in June 2000, with a stockholder who is a former officer and director (the “Landlord”). The lease pertained to certain parcels of land and buildings in Fayetteville, Arkansas for our former corporate headquarters that were included in our Company’s discontinued operations since 2001. On June 28, 2007, the Company entered into a Lease Termination Agreement (the “Termination Agreement”) with the Landlord to terminate the Original Lease as of June 30, 2007, prior to its scheduled June 30, 2009 expiration date. The Termination Agreement required the Company to make a lump sum payment of $503 thousand, which was paid on June 28, 2007 (the “Termination Payment”), representing the remaining lease payments due under the Original Lease and a partial payment of projected 2008 real estate taxes. The amounts paid by the Company in connection with the Termination Agreement were previously accrued at the time the Company discontinued operations of certain divisions, which were sold in 2000 and 2001.

Rent payments related to these facilities, including the Termination Payment, totaled approximately $628 thousand for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2007. No rent payments were made by the Company during the three-month period ended September 30, 2007 as a result of the Termination Agreement. Rent payments related to these facilities totaled approximately $62 thousand and $185 thousand for the three- and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2006, respectively. Following our Company’s corporate headquarters move to Wakefield, Massachusetts during 2001, the Company entered into a sublease agreement on July 1, 2002 with a third party to occupy our Fayetteville office facility. The sublease commenced on July 15, 2002 and ended on June 30, 2007. Sublease payments received by the Company totaled approximately $90 thousand for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2007. No sublease payments were received by the Company during the three-month period ended September 30, 2007. Sublease payments received by the Company totaled approximately $45 thousand and $135 thousand for the three- and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2006, respectively.

12. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES:

Commitments. On May 4, 2006, the Company executed and made effective an amendment to its Second Amendment to Lease agreement with Harvard Mills Limited Partnership (“Harvard Mills”) (the “Third Amendment to Lease Agreement”). The Third Amendment to Lease Agreement pertains to the Company expanding its current office space at its corporate headquarters in Wakefield, Massachusetts by an additional 33,607 square feet (the “New Space”). The Third Amendment to Lease Agreement extends the existing lease term related to our corporate headquarters located in Wakefield, Massachusetts for an additional three years, until September 30, 2016. The Company occupied the New Space during the first quarter of 2007. Rental payment and rent expense related to the New Space commenced at the beginning of the fourth quarter of 2006 (the “New Lease Commencement Date”). The term of Third Amendment to Lease Agreement and the actual square footage covered under the lease have been modified during the three-month period ended September 30, 2007 to reflect the actual New Lease Commencement Date and the final determination of actual square footage upon the completion of the build-out of the New Space.

20

EDGEWATER TECHNOLOGY, INC.

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

12. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (Continued):

As of the New Lease Commencement Date, base rent for the entire premises under the Third Amendment to Lease Agreement, inclusive of the existing space, as outlined in the Company’s Second Amendment to Lease agreement, and the New Space, will be $1.1 million per year for the first three-year period ending September 30, 2009, $1.2 million per year for the subsequent four-year period ending September 30, 2013 and $1.3 million per year for the final three-year period ending September 30, 2016. The Third Amendment to Lease Agreement also provides for the payment of certain common operating expenses.

In June 2007, the Company, as provided for in the Third Amendment to Lease Agreement, received a tenant improvement allowance of $533 thousand from Harvard Mills. The tenant improvement allowance was subsequently decreased by $36 thousand during the three-month period ended September 30, 2007 in connection with the completion of the build-out and the final determination of actual square footage covered under the Third Amendment to Lease Agreement. The tenant allowance has been recorded as a deferred liability under the caption “deferred revenue and other liabilities” in the accompanying balance sheet as of September 30, 2007. The tenant improvement allowance will be amortized as an offset to rent expense over the remaining life of the Third Amendment to Lease Agreement.

Rent payments under operating leases, including amounts paid to related parties for discontinued operations, was approximately $0.4 million and $1.8 million for the three- and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2007, respectively. Rent payments under operating leases, including amounts paid to related parties for discontinued operations, was approximately $0.3 million and $0.9 million for the three- and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2006, respectively. The increase in current year three- and nine-month rent expense is related to the Company’s entrance into a Lease Termination Agreement during the second quarter of 2007, which is more dully described in Note 11, and the additional rent expense attributable to the Third Amendment to Lease Agreement.

As more fully described in Note 7, in addition to the initial purchase price consideration paid to the former stockholders of NDS, Alecian and Lynx, the stockholders are also eligible to receive additional earnout consideration. Any future earnout payments are conditioned upon the attainment of certain performance measurement over respective 12- to 24-month periods following the respective acquisition dates. The former stockholders of NDS were paid contingent earnout consideration of $886 thousand related to the completion of the first NDS earnout period, which ended on February 15, 2007. The former stockholders of NDS are eligible for additional contingent earnout consideration in connection with their second and final earnout period, which will be completed on February 15, 2008. Currently, the Company expects that the future earnout consideration payable to the former NDS stockholders will be similar to the first earnout consideration.

Contingencies. We are sometimes a party to litigation incidental to our business. We believe that these routine legal proceedings will not have a material adverse effect on our financial position. We maintain insurance in amounts with coverages and deductibles that we believe are reasonable. However, there can be no assurance that such coverages will continue to be available on reasonable terms or will be available in sufficient amounts to cover possible claims that may arise in the future, or that our insurers will not disclaim coverage as to any future claim. The successful assertion of one or more claims against the Company that exceed available insurance coverages or changes in the Company’s insurance policies, including premium increases or the imposition of large deductible or co-insurance requirements, would have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, results of operations and financial condition.

13. RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS:

In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements” (“SFAS No. 157”). SFAS No. 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. SFAS No. 157 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007 and interim periods within those fiscal years. We are currently evaluating the impact that SFAS No. 157 will have on our consolidated financial statements.

21

EDGEWATER TECHNOLOGY, INC.

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

13. RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS (Continued):

In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, “The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities, Including an amendment of SFAS No. 115” (“SFAS No. 159”). SFAS No. 159 permits companies to choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value. SFAS No. 159 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. We are currently evaluating the impact that SFAS No. 159 will have on our consolidated financial statements.

22

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following information should be read in conjunction with the information contained in the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements and notes thereto appearing elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006, as filed with the SEC on March 14, 2007. This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. See “Risk Factors” and “Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements” included elsewhere herein. We use the terms “we,” “our,” “us,” “Edgewater,” “Edgewater Technology” and “the Company” in this report to refer to Edgewater Technology, Inc. and its wholly-owned subsidiaries.

Business Overview

Edgewater Technology, Inc. is an innovative technology management consulting firm providing a unique blend of premium IT services. We provide our clients with a range of business and technology offerings focused on assisting them in three primary areas:

• envisioning and realizing strategic business solutions:

• optimizing business processes to improve the delivery of products and services;

• maximizing and unlocking the value of corporate data assets; and

• providing program and project management.

• implementing corporate performance management solutions:

• providing dashboard and data cube design and build;

• providing data warehouse and ETL tool strategies and implementations; and

• combining all components into a comprehensive analytics solution.

• leveraging line business with technology:

• providing design, architectural, and strategic build services;

• melding advanced business analysis with workflow enhancement; and

• evaluating and leveraging infrastructure services.

Our primary target is the middle market whose needs span the full spectrum of our offerings. We also provide specialized premium services to divisions of Global 2000 companies. We go to market by vertical industry and currently serve clients in the following industries: Consumer Packaged Goods/Manufacturing; Financial Services (Retail Banking, Portfolio/Asset Management/Student Lending); Healthcare (Payor/Managed Care)/Life Sciences; Higher Education; Hospitality; Insurance; Retail; and various Emerging Markets.

During the three- and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2007, we generated total revenue of approximately $16.4 million and $51.2 million from a total of 132 and 197 clients, respectively. Headquartered in Wakefield, Massachusetts, our Company employed approximately 274 consulting professionals as of September 30, 2007.

Our ability to generate revenue is affected by the level of business activity of our clients, which in turn is affected by the level of economic activity occurring in the industries and markets that they serve. A decline in the level of business activity of our clients could have a material adverse effect on our revenue and profit margin. To counter-balance any such decline, in the past we have implemented, as necessary, and could implement if necessary in the future, cost-savings initiatives to manage our expenses as a percentage of revenue as appropriate.

Our consulting professionals represent the largest portion of our operating expenses. Project personnel expenses consist of payroll costs and related benefits associated with our professional staff. Other related expenses include travel, subcontracting, third-party vendor payments and non-billable costs associated with the delivery of services to our clients. We consider the relationship between project personnel expenses and revenue to be an important measure of our operating performance. The relationship between project personnel expenses and revenue is driven largely by the chargeability of our consultant base, the prices we charge our clients and the non-billable costs associated with securing new client engagements and developing new service offerings. The remainder of our recurring operating expenses is comprised of expenses associated with the development of our business and the support of our client-serving professionals, such as professional development and recruiting, marketing and sales, and management and administrative support. Professional development and recruiting expenses consist primarily of recruiting and training content development and delivery costs. Marketing and sales expenses consist primarily of the costs associated with the development and maintenance of our marketing materials and programs.

23

Management and administrative support expenses consist primarily of the costs associated with operations including finance, information systems, human resources, facilities (including the rent of office space) and other administrative support for project personnel.

We regularly review our fees for services, professional compensation and overhead costs to ensure that our services and compensation are competitive within our industry, and that our overhead costs are balanced with our revenue level. In addition, we monitor the progress of client projects with client senior management. We manage the activities of our professionals by closely monitoring engagement schedules and staffing requirements for new engagements.

The Company’s management monitors and assesses its operating performance by evaluating key metrics and indicators. For example, we review information related to new customer accounts, annualized revenue per billable consultant, periodic consultant utilization rates, gross profit margins and billable employee headcount. This information, along with other operating performance metrics, is used in evaluating our overall performance. These metrics and indicators are discussed in more detail under “Results for the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2007, Compared to Results for the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2006,” included elsewhere in this Form 10-Q.

Results for the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2007, Compared to Results for the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2006

The financial information that follows has been rounded in order to simplify its presentation. The amounts and percentages below have been calculated using the detailed financial information contained in the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements, the notes thereto, and the other financial data included in this Form 10-Q.

The following table sets forth the percentage of total revenue of items included in our unaudited condensed consolidated statements of operations:

	Three Months Ended September 30,				Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2007		2006		2007		2006
Revenue:
Service revenue	95.7	%	94.7	%	92.3	%	94.5	%
Software revenue	0.1	%	1.5	%	3.6	%	1.7	%
Reimbursable expenses	4.2	%	3.8	%	4.1	%	3.8	%
Total revenue	100.0	%	100.0	%	100.0	%	100.0	%
Cost of revenue:
Project and personnel costs	53.3	%	51.8	%	51.4	%	54.9	%
Software costs	0.1	%	1.2	%	3.0	%	1.4	%
Reimbursable expenses	4.2	%	3.8	%	4.1	%	3.8	%
Total cost of revenue	57.6	%	56.8	%	58.5	%	60.1	%
Gross Profit	42.4	%	43.2	%	41.5	%	39.9	%
Operating expenses:
Selling, general and administrative	31.8	%	30.5	%	31.2	%	31.7	%
Depreciation and amortization	3.7	%	3.0	%	3.4	%	2.8	%
Total operating expenses	35.5	%	33.5	%	34.6	%	34.5	%
Operating income	6.9	%	9.7	%	6.9	%	5.4	%
Interest income, net	2.7	%	2.0	%	2.4	%	1.9	%
Income before income taxes	9.6	%	11.7	%	9.3	%	7.3	%
Provision for income taxes	2.9	%	4.7	%	3.5	%	2.9	%
Net income	6.7	%	7.0	%	5.8	%	4.4	%

24

Revenue. Total revenue increased by $1.2 million, or 7.8%, to $16.4 million for the three-month period ended September 30, 2007, compared to total revenue of $15.2 million in the three-month period ended September 30, 2006. Total revenue increased by $6.8 million, or 15.4%, to $51.2 million for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2007, as compared to total revenue of $44.4 million in the nine-month period ended September 30, 2006.

In the three- and nine- month periods ended September 30, 2007, service revenue, excluding software and reimbursable expense revenue, increased by $1.3 million, or 8.9%, and $5.3 million, or 12.6%, respectively, as compared to service revenue in the same three- and nine-month periods in 2006. The $1.3 million and $5.3 million increase in service revenue during the three- and nine-month periods of 2007 was primarily driven by year-over-year growth within our CPM service offering. All of our offerings experienced year-over-year growth, however, our technical consulting offering, experienced year-over-year growth at a slower rate than in recent quarters. We believe this to be a function of customer delays in spending during the third quarter of 2007. Utilization, which is the rate at which we are able to generate revenue from our consultants, improved to 80.8% during the third quarter of 2007, as compared to 79.9% during the third quarter of 2006. Our billable consultant headcount, excluding the 13 billable consultants added in connection with the Lynx Acquisition, remained relatively consistent during the comparable year-over-year quarterly periods. Both of these metrics are key elements associated with growth in our service revenue.

During the third quarter of 2007, the Company completed two acquisitions: Alecian Corporation, on July 2, 2007, and Lynx Business Intelligence Consulting, Inc., on September 24, 2007. Due to the nominal size of the Alecian Acquisition and the timing of the Lynx Acquisition, neither acquisition had a material impact upon our revenue and results of operations during the three- and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2007.

During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007, we added a total of 16 and 50 new customers, respectively. Not included in the new customer amounts above are 13 customers added in connection with the Lynx Acquisition. We added a total of 19 and 46 new customers during the three- and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2006, respectively.

Service revenue from Synapse, one of our largest customers, amounted to $1.6 million and $5.4 million during the three- and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2007, respectively. Revenues from Synapse in the same three- and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2006 totaled $2.1 million and $6.5 million, respectively. In January of 2007, our Company entered into a new one-year service contract with Synapse. It is anticipated that Synapse will purchase approximately $7.0 million in professional services during 2007. There are no commitments beyond the twelve-month term of the agreement.

Software revenue, which is directly attributable to our CPM offerings, was $0.02 million and $1.8 million for the three- and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2007, respectively. Software revenue for the three- and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2006 totaled $225 thousand and $732 thousand, respectively. Software revenue is expected to fluctuate between quarters depending on our customers’ demand for such third-party off-the-shelf software. Software sales were influenced in both 2007 and 2006 by strong customer demand for such software in relation to BI-related services. Gross profit margins are generally much lower on software sales than on consulting services.

Generally, we are reimbursed for out-of-pocket expenses incurred in connection with our customers’ consulting projects. Reimbursed expense revenue amounted to $0.7 million and $2.1 million during the three- and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2007, respectively. Reimbursed expense revenue totaled $0.6 million and $1.7 million in the three- and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2006, respectively. The aggregate amount of reimbursed expenses will fluctuate from quarter-to-quarter depending on the location of our customers, the general fluctuation of travel costs, such as airfare, and the number of our projects that require travel.

Our annualized service revenue per billable consultant increased to $294 thousand, during the quarterly period ended September 30, 2007, as compared to $281 thousand during the same quarterly period in 2006. Similarly, our annualized revenue per billable consultant increased to $296 thousand, during the nine-month period ended September 30, 2007, as compared to $274 thousand during the same year-to-date period in 2006. The improvement in this metric is primarily due to a greater mix of high-end CPM consulting services, which services have higher consultant billing rates than our other offerings. During the nine-month period ended September 30, 2007, the Company increased the number of customers it served to 197, as compared to 175 customers during the comparative nine-month period ended September 30, 2006. Service revenue from our five largest customers during the three- and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2007 was approximately 45.0% and 48.4% of total service revenue, respectively, as compared to 46.0% and 47.3% in the comparative 2006 quarterly and year-to-date periods, respectively.

25

Cost of Revenue. Cost of revenue primarily consists of project personnel costs principally related to salaries, payroll taxes, employee benefits and travel expenses for personnel dedicated to customer projects. These costs represent the most significant expense we incur in providing our services. In total, cost of revenue increased by $0.8 million, or 9.2%, to $9.4 million for the three-month period ended September 30, 2007, as compared to $8.6 million in the same quarterly period of 2006. Similarly, total cost of revenue increased by $3.3 million, or 12.2%, to $29.9 million for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2007, as compared to cost of revenue of $26.7 million in the nine-month period ended September 30, 2006.

The increase in reported cost of revenue in the three- and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2007 relates to a combination of increased project and personnel costs and software costs. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007, project personnel costs increased by $0.9 million, or 10.8%, and $1.9 million, or 7.7%, respectively. The increase in project and personnel costs is a result of increased consultant salaries in connection with annual merit increases and a strategic shift to a higher-end consultant base. During the three- and nine-month periods of 2007, the Company adjusted the skill-set mix of its consultant base in order to accommodate the growth in our respective CPM and strategy service offerings. The net affect of this change served to increase the average salaries of our consultants, which caused the reported year-over-year increase in project personnel costs during the three- and nine-month periods of 2007. As of September 30, 2007, the Company employed 274 billable consultants, which includes the 13 billable resources added in connection with the Lynx Acquisition, as compared to 261 billable consultants as of September 30, 2006.

Software costs were $10 thousand and $1.6 million during the three- and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2007, respectively, as compared to software costs of $0.2 million and $0.6 million during the three- and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2006. The increase in software costs during the 2007 year-to-date reporting period is a result of a large software order received during the second quarter. Software costs are expected to fluctuate between quarters depending on our customer’s demand for CPM-related software. Reimbursable expenses increased by $0.1 million, or 19.4%, to $0.7 million during the three months ended September 30, 2007, as compared to reimbursable expenses of $0.6 million during the comparative 2006 quarterly period. Similarly, reimbursable expenses increased by $0.4 million, or 25.1%, to $2.1 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2007, as compared to reimbursable expenses of $1.7 million during the comparative 2006 quarterly period. The quarterly and year-to-date increases in reimbursable expenses are a direct result of the Company’s increased customer base and associated travel-related expenses incurred during the reported periods.

Gross Profit. Gross profit increased by $0.4 million, or 6.0%, to $6.9 million in the three-month period ended September 30, 2007, as compared to gross profit of $6.5 million in the three-month period ended September 30, 2006. Gross profit, as a percentage of total revenue, decreased to 42.4% in third quarter of 2007, as compared to 43.2% in the comparative 2006 quarterly period. Gross margin related to service revenue decreased to 44.3% during the three-month period ended September 30, 2007, as compared to 45.2% for the three-month period ended September 30, 2006. The Company’s management targets gross margin related to service revenue to be between 42% and 45%.

During the nine-month period ended September 30, 2007, gross profit increased by $3.6 million, or 20.3%, to $21.3 million compared to gross profit of $17.7 million in the nine-month period ended September 30, 2006. Gross profit, as a percentage of total revenue, increased to 41.5% in the 2007 year-to-date period, as compared to 39.9% in the comparative 2006 year-to-date period. Gross margin related to service revenue increased to 44.4% during the nine-month period ended September 30, 2007, as compared to 41.9% for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2006.

The increase in gross profit, on an absolute dollar basis, during the current quarterly and year-to-date periods is primarily being driven by stronger utilization rates for our consultants. Fluctuations in gross profit, as a percentage of total revenue and service revenue, were influenced by the Company’s billable consultant utilization rates during the respective three- and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2007. Billable consultant utilization improved to 80.8% during the third quarter of 2007 compared to 79.9% during the third quarter of 2006. Similarly, billable consultant utilization improved to 82.2% during the first nine months of 2007 compared to 78.5% during the first nine months of 2006. The Company’s management operates the business with a targeted utilization rate of 78.0% to 82.0%.

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses (“SG&A”). SG&A expense, as a percentage of total revenue, increased to 31.8% for the three-month period ended September 30, 2007, as compared to 30.5% for the three-month period ended September 30, 2006. SG&A expenses, as a percentage of revenue, decreased to 31.2% for the first nine months of 2007, as compared to 31.7% for the corresponding 2006 year-to-date period. The increase in SG&A expenses during the three-months ended September 30, 2007 is attributable to expected increases related to our facilities expansion and current year Sarbanes-Oxley readiness programs. On a year-to-date basis, the improvement in SG&A expenses, as a percentage of service revenue in the 2007 is a result of economies of scale, as our Company’s year-to-date revenue growth has outpaced the increased SG&A expense to support such revenue growth.

26

On an absolute dollar basis, SG&A expenses increased by $0.6 million to $5.2 million in the three-month period ended September 30, 2007, as compared to SG&A expenses of $4.6 million in the three-month period ended September 30, 2006. SG&A expenses increased by $1.9 million to $16.0 million in the nine-month period ended September 30, 2007, as compared to SG&A expenses of $14.0 million in the nine-month period ended September 30, 2006. The increase in SG&A expenses during three- and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2007 was primarily due to increases in the current quarter bonus expense in connection with the Company’s 2007 performance-based bonus plan, additional rent related to our facilities expansion and increased professional services expenses in connection with the preparation of our Sarbanes-Oxley readiness programs.

As more fully described in Note 12 of the Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements included elsewhere herein, on May 4, 2006, the Company executed and made effective the Third Amendment to Lease Agreement for our corporate headquarters location. Additional future annual rent expense to be recognized by the Company under the Third Amendment to Lease Agreement will be approximately $0.7 million per year. The Company began paying rent on the new office space covered under the Third Amendment to Lease Agreement during the fourth quarter of 2006.

Depreciation and Amortization Expense. Depreciation and amortization expense increased to $0.6 million in the quarter ended September 30, 2007, as compared to $0.5 million in the quarter ended September 30, 2006. Depreciation and amortization expense increased to $1.7 million in the nine-month period ended September 30, 2007, as compared to $1.3 million in the nine-month period ended September 30, 2006. Amortization expense was $0.3 million and $1.0 million for the three- and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2007.

The current quarter and year-to-date amortization expense has not increased significantly from the comparative 2006 period, however depreciation expense increased to $275 thousand in the third quarter of 2007, as compared to $127 thousand in the third quarter of 2006. The increase in depreciation expense is primarily related to the build-out and expansion of our corporate headquarters location, as described above. Additionally, we expect future amortization expense to increase by $61 thousand on a quarterly basis in connection with the amortization of intangible assets associated with the Lynx Acquisition.

Operating Income. Operating income decreased by $0.4 million, or 22.8%, to $1.1 million in the three-month period ended September 30, 2007, as compared to operating income of $1.5 million in the three-month period ended September 30, 2006. Operating income increased by $1.1 million, or 49.0%, to $3.5 million in the nine-month period ended September 30, 2007, as compared to operating income of $2.4 million in the nine-month period ended September 30, 2006. The fluctuations in current quarter and year-to-date operating income are attributable to the increases in comparative service revenue and SG&A expenses. The decrease in operating income during the three-month period ended September 30, 2007 is a direct result of slower growth in service revenue and the increase in certain S,G&A expenses described above. The year-to-date increase in operating income for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2007 is due to the overall increase in service revenue, which has outpaced the expected increases in SG&A expense. Each of these items is explained in further detail above.

Interest Income, Net. We earned net interest income of $0.4 million in the third quarter of 2007, as compared to net interest income of $0.3 million in the third quarter of 2006. Interest income totaled $1.2 million and $0.9 million in the nine-month periods ended September 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively. Interest income has increased in the comparative three- and nine-month periods as a result of improved yields on our investments during 2007, as compared to those achieved in during the respective 2006 periods. Average maturity and yield rates as of September 30, 2007 were approximately 87 days and 5.4%, respectively, as compared to 73 days and 5.0%, respectively, as of September 30, 2006.

Provision for Income Taxes. The Company accrues a provision for federal and state income taxes at the applicable statutory rates, adjusted for non-deductible expenses. We recorded an income tax provision of $0.5 million and $1.8 million for the three- and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2007, as compared to a provision of $0.7 million and $1.3 million for the three- and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2006. The income tax provision for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007 represents tax expense based on an effective income tax rate of 29.8% and 37.7%, respectively. Income tax expense in both periods represented tax expense calculated at our projected effective income tax rate of 41.5%, offset by a tax benefit of $0.2 million in connection with the Company’s recognition of certain tax benefits under SFAS No. 123R.

During the fourth quarter, in connection with our ongoing review of the likelihood of the expected future tax benefits to be generated from our deferred tax assets, we believe that we may recognize additional favorable adjustments to our income tax provision that may have a significant impact upon our fourth quarter and full-year net income and earnings per share.

The Company’s provision for income taxes for the three- and nine-month periods of 2006 is reflective of and an estimated effective income tax rate of 40.0%. The current quarter and year-to-date increase in our effective income tax rate is reflective of our full utilization of certain state net operating loss carryforwards during 2006.

27

We have deferred tax assets resulting primarily from federal net operating losses and capital loss carryforwards amounting to $23.6 million for which we have a valuation allowance of $6.5 million. Our federal income tax amounts are charged directly against our deferred tax asset and currently do not result in cash outlays by the Company, except with regard to alternative minimum tax (“AMT”). As a result of our federal net operating loss carryforwards, we anticipate that we will only make a cash outlay of approximately $359 thousand, representing the state income tax and AMT portion of our $2.0 million provision for income taxes recorded during the nine-month period ended September 30, 2007. This is due to the fact that the Company utilized $1.6 million in federal net operating loss carryforwards to offset federal tax liabilities that otherwise would be payable without such carryforwards. The Company’s significant operating loss carryforwards are scheduled to expire on or before 2020.

Net Income. We reported net income of $1.1 million and $3.0 million during the three- and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2007, as compared to $1.1 million and $2.0 million during the comparative 2006 quarterly and year-to-date periods. The current year-to-date increase in income is a cumulative result of our growth in revenue, gross profit and the current quarter recognition of certain previously reserved deferred tax benefits, which are discussed above.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

The following table summarizes our cash flow activities for the periods indicated:

	Three Months Ended September 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2007			2006			2007			2006
	(In Thousands)
Cash flows (used in) provided by:
Operating activities	$	2,139		$	2,206		$	3,729		$	2,890
Discontinued operating activities		(6	)		(22	)		(558	)		(115	)
Investing activities		(3,211	)		942			(7,627	)		1,590
Financing activities		455			329			2,372			1,699
Total (used) provided during the period	$	(623	)	$	3,455		$	(2,084	)	$	6,064

As of September 30, 2007, we had cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities of $31.8 million, a $1.4 million, or 4.2%, decrease from the December 31, 2006 balance of $33.2 million. Working capital, which is defined as current assets less current liabilities, increased $2.7 million, to $40.3 million, as of September 30, 2007, as compared to $37.6 million as of December 31, 2006. The decrease in the Company’s cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities is primarily related to the net cash inflow of $3.0 million in income from operations, $2.5 million in proceeds from the employee stock purchase plan and stock option exercises and the receipt of $0.5 million in a tenant improvement allowance related to the Third Amendment to Lease Agreement. These inflows were offset by outflows related to the first quarter payment of the Company’s 2006 performance-based bonus plan, outflows of $2.2 million to current year capital expenditures related to the facilities expansion, $0.7 million in contingent earnout consideration paid to the former NDS stockholders, payment of $0.5 million in connection with the Lease Termination Agreement and $4.0 million in connection with the acquisitions of Alecian and Lynx, which are more fully described in Note 7 of the Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements included elsewhere herein.

Our primary historical sources of funds have been from operations and the proceeds from equity offerings, as well as sales of businesses in fiscal years 2000 and 2001. Our principal historical uses of cash have been to fund working capital requirements, capital expenditures and acquisitions. We generally pay our employees bi-weekly for their services, while receiving payments from customers 30 to 60 days from the date of the invoice.

Historically, a significant portion of the Company’s cash flows from operations have been derived from one of our largest customers, Synapse, which is considered a related party. Payments received by the Company for services rendered to Synapse totaled approximately $1.3 million and $5.2 million in the three- and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2007, respectively. Payments received from Synapse totaled approximately $2.1 million and $6.5 million in the three- and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2006, respectively. All receivable amounts were collected within our normal business terms and our contracts with Synapse are typically for a period of one year or more. In the event there is a loss of revenue related to Synapse, it would be expected that such a loss would have an adverse impact upon the Company’s operations and cash flows. However, we believe such an impact could be mitigated through the management of employee headcount and through the redeployment of existing Synapse-related resources on to other consulting projects.

28

Cash provided by operating activities was $2.1 million and $2.2 million for the three months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively. The cash provided during the three months ended September 30, 2007 was largely attributable to inflows attributable to reported income from operations of $1.1 million and $0.6 million in accrued payroll and related liabilities related to an increase in bonus accruals under the Company’s 2007 performance-based bonus plan. Additional positive cash flow items in the current quarter related to the Company’s utilization of its deferred tax asset of $0.3 million, stock-based compensation expense of $0.4 million, $0.4 million in accounts receivable collections and depreciation and amortization expense of $0.6 million. These cash inflows were partially offset by outflows of $1.3 million in accounts payable and accrued liabilities which were primarily related to the third quarter payment of a significant CPM-related software invoice that had been accrued during the second quarter of 2007.

The cash provided during the three months ended September 30, 2006 was largely attributable to inflows of cash related to collections of accounts receivable balances of $2.1 million, reported income from continuing operations of $1.1 million, and $0.3 million in prepaid and other assets related to the routine amortization of annual insurance premiums. Additional positive cash flow items in the current quarter related to the Company’s utilization of its deferred tax asset of $0.6 million, stock-based compensation expense of $0.2 million and depreciation and amortization expense of $0.5 million. These inflows were partially offset by the current quarter decrease in accounts payable and accrued liabilities of $2.5 million, which were attributable to the Company’s payment of contingent earnout consideration to the stockholders of Ranzal.

Net cash provided by operating activities was $3.7 million and $2.9 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively. The cash provided during the nine months ended September 30, 2007 was attributable to inflows attributable to reported income from operations of $3.0 million, utilization of the Company’s deferred tax asset of $1.4 million, stock-based compensation expense of $1.0 million, an increase in deferred revenue and other liabilities of $0.7 million primarily related to the Company’s receipt of $0.5 million in a tenant improvement allowance and depreciation and amortization expense of $1.7 million. These cash inflows were partially offset by outflows of cash related to the increase in accounts receivable balances, in connection with increased revenues, of $3.5 million.

Net cash provided by operating activities during the nine months ended September 30, 2006 was attributable to income from continuing operations of $2.0 million, depreciation and amortization expense of $1.3 million and $0.6 million in prepaid and other assets related to the routine amortization of annual insurance premiums. Additional positive cash flow items in the 2006 year-to-date period related to the Company’s utilization of its deferred tax asset of $1.1 million and stock-based compensation expense of $1.0 million. These inflows of cash were primarily offset by a decrease in accrued payroll and related liabilities of $2.4 million.

Net cash used in discontinued operations was $6 thousand and $22 thousand for the three months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively. Similarly, net cash used in discontinued operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006 was $0.6 million and $115 thousand, respectively. Net cash used in each of the presented three- and nine-month periods related to payments on previously accrued lease arrangements and health benefits associated with former executives. Additionally, the significant increase in current year three- and nine-month cash used in discontinued operations is related to the Company’s entrance into a Lease Termination Agreement during the second quarter of 2007, which is more fully described in Note 11 of the Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements included elsewhere herein.

Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities was $(3.2) million and $0.9 million for the three months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively. Cash used in investing activities during the 2007 quarterly period was a direct result of the $4.1 million in consideration paid in connection with the Alecian and Lynx acquisitions, which was offset by $1.1 million in net redemptions of marketable securities used to fund the acquisition payments. Net cash provided by investing activities during the three months ended September 30, 2006 was primarily attributable to net redemptions of marketable securities of $1.1 million, which were offset by purchases of property and equipment of $0.2 million.

Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities was $(7.6) million and $1.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively. Cash used in investing activities during the nine months ended September 30, 2007 was attributable to net purchases of marketable securities of $0.6 million, $0.7 million in contingent earnout consideration paid to the former stockholders of NDS in connection with the completion of the first earnout period, $4.1 million in consideration paid in connection with the Alecian and Lynx acquisitions and $2.2 million in capital expenditures

29

related to the build-out of the new space covered under the Third Amendment to Lease Agreement. Cash provided by investing activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 was attributable to cash inflows from net redemptions of marketable securities of $11.5 million, which were offset by a cash outflow of $6.6 million related to the NDS Acquisition and $2.7 million in contingent earnout consideration, payable to the former stockholders of Ranzal, directly related to the successful completion of Ranzal’s second and final earnout period.

As of September 30, 2007, our primary material future liquidity requirements consist of earnout payments described under “Acquisitions, Earnout Payments and Commitments” and increased lease payments associated with our lease obligations. See “Off Balance Sheet Arrangements, Contractual Obligations and Contingent Liabilities and Commitments” included elsewhere herein.

Net cash provided by financing activities was $0.5 million and $0.3 million for the three months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively. Similarly, net cash provided by financing activities was $2.4 million and 1.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively. The net cash provided by financing activities in each of the reported three- and nine-month periods is primarily attributable to the cash received from stock option exercises and proceeds from the employee stock purchase program.

Our combined cash and cash equivalents (decreased) increased by $(0.6) million and $3.5 million in the three-month periods ended September 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively. Our combined cash and cash equivalents (decreased) increased by $(2.1) million and $6.1 million during the nine-month periods ended September 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively. The changes to the Company’s reported cash and cash equivalent balances are reflective of the sources and uses of cash described above. The aggregate of cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities was $31.8 as of September 30, 2007.

We believe that our current cash balances and cash flows from operations will be sufficient to fund our short-term operating and liquidity requirements, at least for the next twelve-month period, and our long-term operating and liquidity requirements, based on our current business model. We periodically reassess the adequacy of our liquidity position, taking into consideration current and anticipated requirements. The pace at which we will either generate or consume cash will be dependent upon future operations and the level of demand for our services on an ongoing basis.

Acquisitions, Earnout Payments and Commitments

Acquisition of Alecian Corporation: On July 2, 2007, the Company acquired certain assets and liabilities of Alecian, pursuant to the terms of a definitive Asset Purchase Agreement. In connection with the Alecian Acquisition, the Company paid to the shareholders of Alecian total cash consideration of $500 thousand at closing. The Company incurred $293 thousand of direct acquisition costs.

In addition, an earnout agreement was entered into in connection with the Alecian Acquisition, and it specifies additional earnout consideration that could be payable to the former Alecian stockholders. Earnout payments are conditioned upon the attainment of certain performance measurements for the Alecian business over a 12-month period from the date of the acquisition. Assuming all performance measurements are met within the predetermined performance ranges, additional earnout consideration of approximately $1.0 million would be payable to the shareholders of Alecian.

Acquisition of Lynx Business Intelligence Consulting, Inc.: On September 24, 2007, the Company acquired certain assets and liabilities of Lynx, pursuant to the terms of a definitive Asset Purchase Agreement. In connection with the Lynx Acquisition, the Company paid to the shareholder of Lynx total consideration of approximately $5.0 million, consisting of an initial upfront payment at closing of approximately $3.0 million in cash and 233,599 shares, valued at approximately $2.0 million, of Edgewater’s common stock, $0.01 par value per share (“Common Stock”), which is subject to a three-year lock-up agreement. The Company incurred $303 thousand of direct acquisition costs.

30

In addition, an earnout agreement was entered into in connection with the Lynx Acquisition, and it specifies additional earnout consideration that could be payable to the former Lynx stockholders. Earnout payments are conditioned upon the attainment of certain performance measurements for the Lynx business over a 12- to 24-month period from the date of the acquisition. Assuming all performance measurements are met within the predetermined performance ranges, additional earnout consideration of approximately $0.5 million would be payable, in cash, to the former shareholder of Lynx.

Acquisition of National Decision Systems, Inc.: In connection with the NDS acquisition, the Company paid to the shareholders of NDS total consideration of approximately $10.2 million, consisting of an initial upfront payment at closing of approximately $8.5 million in cash and assumed liabilities and 264,610 shares of Edgewater’s common stock, $0.01 par value per share (“Common Stock”), which is subject to a three-year lock-up agreement. The Company incurred $0.7 million of direct acquisition costs.

In addition to the initial cash consideration, the former stockholders of NDS were eligible to receive additional earnout consideration based upon the attainment of certain performance measurements. On February 15, 2007, the NDS stockholders completed their first earnout period, during which the required minimum performance measurements were achieved. During the first quarter of 2007, the Company accrued $886 thousand payable to the former NDS stockholders directly related to the completion of the first earnout period. Of this amount, $709 thousand of the contingent earnout consideration was paid in cash and $177 thousand was settled through the issuance of 21,751 shares of Common Stock. The contingent earnout consideration paid to the former NDS stockholders was reported as an increase in goodwill in the Company’s balance sheet during the first quarter of 2007.

The former stockholders of NDS are also eligible for additional contingent earnout consideration in connection with their second and final earnout period, which will be completed on February 15, 2008. Currently, the company expects that any future earnout consideration could be similar to the first earnout payment.

Off Balance Sheet Arrangements, Contractual Obligations and Contingent Liabilities and Commitments

On May 4, 2006, the Company executed and made effective the Third Amendment to Lease Agreement. The Third Amendment to Lease Agreement pertains to the Company expanding its current office space at its corporate headquarters in Wakefield, Massachusetts by an additional 33,607 square feet (the “New Space”). The Third Amendment to Lease Agreement extends the existing lease term related to our corporate headquarters located in Wakefield, Massachusetts for an additional three years, until September 30, 2016. The Company occupied the New Space during the first quarter of 2007. Rental payment and rent expense related to the New Space commenced at the beginning of the fourth quarter of 2006 (the “New Lease Commencement Date”). The term of Third Amendment to Lease Agreement and the actual square footage covered under the lease have been modified during the three-month period ended September 30, 2007 to reflect the actual New Lease Commencement Date and the final determination of actual square footage upon the completion of the build-out of the New Space.

As of the New Lease Commencement Date, base rent for the entire premises under the Third Amendment to Lease Agreement, inclusive of the existing space, as outlined in the Company’s Second Amendment to Lease agreement, and the New Space, will be $1.1 million per year for the first three-year period ending September 30, 2009, $1.2 million per year for the subsequent four-year period ending September 30, 2013 and $1.3 million per year for the final three-year period ending September 30, 2016. The Third Amendment to Lease Agreement also provides for the payment of certain common operating expenses. Rent expense related solely to our Wakefield facility was $256 thousand and $156 thousand during the three months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively. Rent expense related solely to our Wakefield facility was $886 thousand and $412 thousand during the nine months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively.

31

In December 2006, the Company entered into lease financing arrangements (the “Capital Lease Arrangements”) with a bank related to certain property and equipment. Payments under the Capital Lease Arrangements are to be made over a period of 48 to 60 months and have a blended interest rate of 6.03% per annum on the outstanding principle balances. As of September 30, 2007, our outstanding obligations under our Capital Lease Arrangements totaled $882 thousand. Of this amount, $191 thousand, which is due and payable within the next twelve months, has been classified as a current capital lease obligation in the accompanying balance sheet. During the three- and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2007, the Company made payments of principle and interest totaling $46 thousand and $80 thousand, respectively under the Capital Lease Arrangements. No payments related to capital lease obligations were made during the three- and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2006.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

We prepare our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. As such, we are required to make certain estimates, judgments and assumptions that we believe are reasonable based upon the information available. These estimates and assumptions affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the periods presented. Except for the adoption of FIN No. 48, as described in Note 5 of Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements included elsewhere herein, we reaffirm the critical accounting policies and estimates as reported in our 2006 Annual Report on Form 10-K, which was filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 14, 2007.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements” (“SFAS No. 157”). SFAS No. 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. SFAS No. 157 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007 and interim periods within those fiscal years. We are currently evaluating the impact that SFAS No. 157 will have on our consolidated financial statements.

In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, “The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities, Including an amendment of SFAS No. 115” (“SFAS No. 159”). SFAS No. 159 permits companies to choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value. SFAS No. 159 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. We are currently evaluating the impact that SFAS No. 159 will have on our consolidated financial statements.

32

Risk Factors

In addition to other information contained in this Form 10-Q, the following risk factors should be carefully considered in evaluating Edgewater Technology and its business because such factors could have a significant impact on our business, operating results and financial condition. These risk factors could cause actual results to materially differ from those projected in any forward-looking statements.

Our success depends on a limited number of significant customers, and our results of operations and financial condition could be negatively affected by the loss of a major customer or significant project or the failure to collect a large account receivable. We generate a significant portion of our service revenue from a limited number of customers. As a result, if we were to lose a major customer or large project, our service revenue could be materially and adversely affected. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007, our five largest customers accounted for 45.0% and 48.4% of our service revenue, respectively. We perform varying amounts of work for specific customers from year-to-year. A major customer in one year may not use our services in another year. In addition, we may derive revenue from a major customer that constitutes a large portion of a particular quarter’s total revenue. If we lose any major customers or any of our customers cancel or significantly reduce a large project’s scope, including but not limited to Synapse, our results of operations and financial condition could be materially and adversely affected. Further, if we fail to collect a large accounts receivable balance, we could be subjected to a material financial expense and a decrease in cash flow.

Our lack of long-term customer contracts reduces the predictability of our revenues because these contracts may be canceled on short notice and without penalty. Our customers generally retain us on a project-by-project basis, rather than under long-term contracts. As a result, a customer may not engage us for further services once a project is complete. If a significant customer, or a number of customers, terminate, significantly reduce, or modify their contracts with us, our results of operations would be materially and adversely affected. Consequently, future revenue should not be predicted or anticipated based on the number of customers we have or the number and size of our existing projects. If a customer were to postpone, modify, or cancel a project, including but not limited to Synapse, we would be required to shift our consultants to other projects to minimize the impact on our operating results. We cannot provide assurance that we will be successful in efficiently and effectively shifting our consultants to new projects in the event of project terminations, which could result in reduced service revenue and lower gross margins. If we experience unexpected changes or variability in our revenue, we could experience variations in our quarterly operating results and our actual results may differ materially from the amounts planned and our operating profitability may be reduced or eliminated.

If we fail to satisfy our customers’ expectations, our existing and continuing business could be adversely affected. Our sales and marketing strategy emphasizes our belief that we have highly referenceable accounts. Therefore, if we fail to satisfy the expectations of our customers, we could damage our reputation and our ability to retain existing customers and attract new customers. In addition, if we fail to deliver and perform on our engagements, we could be liable to our customers for breach of contract. Although most of our contracts limit the amount of any damages to the fees we receive, we could still incur substantial cost, negative publicity, and diversion of management resources to defend a claim, and as a result, our business results could suffer.

Competition in the IT and management consulting services market is intense and, therefore, we may lose projects to, or face pricing pressure from, our competitors or prospective customers’ internal IT departments or international outsourcing firms. The market for IT and management consulting providers is highly competitive. In many cases, we compete for premium IT services work with in-house technical staff, software product companies with extended service organizations and other international IT and management consulting firms, including offshore outsourcing firms. In addition, there are many small, boutique technology management consulting firms who have developed services similar to those offered by us. We believe that competition will continue to be strong and may increase in the future, especially if our competitors reduce their price for IT and management consulting services, reduce their blended costs for such services and/or enhance the quality or range of services. Such pricing pressure could have a material impact on our revenues and margins and limit our ability to provide competitive services.

Our target market is rapidly evolving and is subject to continuous technological change. As a result, our competitors may be better positioned to address these developments or may react more favorably to these changes, which could have a material adverse effect on our business. We compete on the basis of a number of factors, many of which are beyond our control. Existing or future competitors may develop or offer IT and management consulting services that provide significant technological, creative, performance, price or other advantages over the services we offer.

33

See “Item 1 – Business—Competition” in our 2006 Annual Report on Form 10-K, as filed with the SEC on March 14, 2007, for a representative list of competitors in the IT and management consulting services space.

Some of our competitors have longer operating histories and significantly greater financial, technical, marketing and managerial resources than we do. There are relatively low barriers of entry into our business. We have no patented or other proprietary technology that would preclude or inhibit competitors from entering the IT services market. Therefore, we must rely on the skill of our personnel and the quality of our customer service. The costs to start an IT and management consulting services firm are low. We expect that we will continue to face additional competition from new entrants into the market in the future, offshore providers and larger integrators and we are subject to the risk that our employees may leave us and may start competing businesses. Any one or more of these factors could have a material impact on our business.

Because we rely on highly-trained and experienced personnel to design and build complex systems for our customers, an inability to retain existing employees and attract new qualified employees would impair our ability to provide our services to existing and new customers. Our future success depends in large part on our ability to attract new qualified employees and retain existing highly-trained and experienced technical consultants, project management consultants, business analysts and sales and marketing professionals of various experience levels. If we fail to attract new employees or retain our existing employees, we may be unable to complete existing projects or bid for new projects of similar size, which could adversely affect our revenues. While attracting and retaining experienced employees is critical to our business and growth strategy, maintaining our current employee base may also be particularly difficult. Even if we are able to grow and expand our employee base, the additional resources required to attract new employees and retain existing employees may adversely affect our operating margins.

We depend on our key personnel, and the loss of their services may adversely affect our business. We believe that our success depends on the continued employment of the senior management team and other key personnel. This dependence is particularly important to our business because personal relationships are a critical element in obtaining and maintaining customer engagements. If one or more members of the senior management team or other key personnel were unable or unwilling to continue in their present positions, our business could be seriously harmed. Furthermore, other companies seeking to develop in-house business capabilities may hire away some of our key personnel.

Past or future business combination transactions or other strategic alternatives could disrupt our ongoing business, distract our management and employees, increase our expenses and adversely affect our business. We realized recent growth, in part, through acquisitions, and we anticipate that a portion of our future growth may be accomplished through one or more business combination transactions or other strategic alternatives. The ultimate success of any such transactions will depend upon, among other things, our ability to integrate acquired personnel, operations, products and technologies into our organization effectively, to retain and motivate key personnel of acquired businesses and to retain customers of acquired businesses. We cannot assure you that we will be successful in this regard or that we will be able to identify suitable opportunities, continue to successfully grow acquired businesses, integrate acquired personnel and operations successfully or utilize our cash or equity securities as acquisition currency on acceptable terms to complete any such business combination transactions. These difficulties could disrupt our ongoing business, distract our management and employees, increase our expenses and materially and adversely affect our results of operations. Any such transactions would involve certain other risks, including the reduction of cash and/or working capital, the assumption of additional liabilities, potentially dilutive issuances of equity securities and diversion of management’s attention from operating activities.

Volatility of our stock price could result in expensive class action litigation. If our common stock suffers from volatility like the securities of other technology and consulting companies, we could be subject to securities class action litigation similar to that which has been brought against other companies following periods of volatility in the market price of their common stock. The process of defending against these types of claims, regardless of their merit, is costly and often creates a considerable distraction to senior management. Any future litigation could result in substantial additional costs and could divert our resources and senior management’s attention. This could harm our productivity and profitability and potentially adversely affect our stock price.

We may not be able to protect our intellectual property rights or we may infringe upon the intellectual property rights of others, which could adversely affect our business. Our future success will depend, in part, upon our intellectual property rights and our ability to protect these rights. We do not have any patents or patent applications pending. Existing trade secret and copyright laws afford us only limited protection. Third parties may attempt to disclose, obtain or use our solutions or technologies. This is particularly true in foreign countries where laws or law enforcement practices may not protect our proprietary rights as fully as in the United States. Others may independently develop and obtain patents or copyrights for

34

technologies that are similar or superior to our technologies. If that happens, we may need to license these technologies and we may not be able to obtain licenses on reasonable terms, if at all. If we are unsuccessful in any future intellectual property litigation, we may be forced to do one or more of the following:

• Cease selling or using technology or services that incorporate the challenged intellectual property;

• Obtain a license, which may not be available on reasonable terms or at all, to use the relevant technology;

• Configure services to avoid infringement; and

• Refund license fees or other payments that we have previously received.

Generally, we develop software applications for specific customer engagements. Issues relating to ownership of and rights to use software applications and frameworks can be complicated. Also, we may have to pay economic damages in these disputes, which could adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.

Fluctuations in our quarterly revenues and operating results may lead to reduced prices for our stock. Our quarterly revenues and operating results can sometimes be volatile. We believe comparisons of prior period operating results cannot be relied upon as indicators of future performance. If our revenues or our operating results in any future period fall below the expectations of securities analysts and investors, the market price of our securities would likely decline.

Factors that may cause our quarterly results to fluctuate in the future include the following:

• Variability in market demand for IT and management consulting services;

• Length of the sales cycle associated with our service offerings;

• Unanticipated variations in the size, budget, number or progress toward completion of our engagements;

• Unanticipated termination of a major engagement, a customer’s decision not to proceed with an engagement we anticipated or the completion or delay during a quarter of several major customer engagements;

• Efficiency with which we utilize our employees, or utilization, including our ability to transition employees from completed engagements to new engagements;

• Our ability to manage our operating costs, a large portion of which are fixed in advance of any particular quarter;

• Changes in pricing policies by us or our competitors;

• Seasonality and cyclicality, including the effects of lower utilization rates during periods with disproportionately high holiday and vacation usage experience;

• The timing of customer year-end periods and the impact of spending relative to such year-end periods;

• Our ability to manage future growth; and

• Costs of attracting, retaining and training skilled personnel.

Some of these factors are within our control, while others are outside of our control.

Anti-takeover provisions in our charter documents, our stockholder rights plan and/or Delaware law could prevent or delay a change in control of our Company. Our Board of Directors can issue preferred stock in one or more series without stockholder action. The existence of this “blank-check” preferred stock provision could render more difficult or discourage an attempt to obtain control by means of a tender offer, merger, proxy contest or otherwise. In addition, our Company has a stockholder rights plan, commonly referred to as a “poison pill,” that may discourage an attempt to obtain control by means of a tender offer, merger, proxy contest or otherwise. If a person acquires 20% or more of our outstanding shares of common stock, except for certain institutional stockholders, who may acquire up to 25% of our outstanding shares of common stock, then rights under this plan would be triggered, which would significantly dilute the voting rights of any such acquiring person. Certain provisions of the Delaware General Corporation Law may also discourage someone from acquiring or merging with us.

If clients view offshore development as a viable alternative to our service offerings, our pricing, revenue, margins and profitability may be negatively affected. A trend has developed whereas international IT service firms have been founded in countries such as India and China, which have well-educated and technically-trained workforces available at wage rates that are substantially lower than U.S. wage rates. While traditionally we have not competed with offshore development, presently this form of software development is experiencing rapid and increasing acceptance in the market. To counteract this trend, we are focusing towards premium service offerings, including design and strategy consulting engagements, which are more difficult for offshore development firms to replicate. If we are unable to continually evolve our service offerings or the rate of acceptance of offshore development advances even faster than we expect, then our pricing and revenue could be adversely affected.

35

We may be required to record additional goodwill impairment charges in future quarters. As of September 30, 2007, we had recorded goodwill and related intangible assets with a net book value of $34.8 million related to prior acquisitions. We test for impairment at least annually and whenever evidence of impairment exists. We performed our annual goodwill impairment test as of December 2, 2006 and determined that the goodwill and related intangible assets were not impaired. We have in the past recorded impairments to our goodwill, however. In January 2002, we recorded as a change in accounting principle, a non-cash impairment charge of $12.5 million related to our goodwill. We recorded an additional non-cash charge of $7.4 million, related to a further impairment in December 2002. See “Item 8 – Financial Statements and Supplementary Data—Notes 2 and 7” in our 2006 Annual Report on Form 10-K as filed with the SEC on March 14, 2007. As goodwill values are measured using a variety of factors, including values of comparable companies and using overall stock market and economic data, in addition to our own future financial performance, we may be required in the future to record additional impairment charges that could have a material adverse effect on our reported results.

We may not generate enough income in future periods to maintain the current net carrying value of our deferred tax asset. We have a deferred tax asset of approximately $17.1 million, net of an applicable valuation allowance, as of September 30, 2007. If we are unable to generate enough income this year or in future periods, the valuation allowance relating to our deferred tax asset may have to be revised upward, which would reduce the carrying value of this asset on our balance sheet under generally accepted accounting principles. An increase in the valuation allowance and a related reduction in the carrying value of this asset would increase our provision for income taxes, thereby reducing net income or increasing net loss, and could reduce our total assets (depending on the amount of any such change or changes). An increase in the valuation allowance could otherwise have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and/or our stockholders’ equity and financial position.

Material changes to our strategic relationship with Oracle USA, Inc. (“Oracle”) (formerly known as Hyperion Solutions Corporation). The Ranzal business derives a substantial portion of its revenues from a channel relationship with Oracle. This relationship involves Oracle assisted lead generation support with respect to the business intelligence services provided by Ranzal. This relationship is governed by an Oracle PartnerNetwork Agreement, which is subject to annual renewal and is scheduled to expire in September of 2008. A failure to renew this relationship, or a material modification or change in Oracle’s partner approach or its contract terms, for any reason, could have a material adverse impact on our results of operations.

Our reliance upon Synapse. Synapse is considered both a significant customer and a related party. Service revenue from Synapse amounted to $1.6 million and $5.4 million in the three- and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2007, respectively. Service revenue from Synapse amounted to $2.1 million and $6.5 million in the three- and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2006, respectively. The Company provides services to Synapse related to infrastructure support, custom software development and systems integration. Services are provided on both a fixed-fee and time and materials basis. Our contracts with Synapse, including all terms and conditions, are consistent with those we have with our other customers and are negotiated on an annual basis. In January of 2007, our Company entered into a new one-year service contract with Synapse. It is anticipated that Synapse will purchase approximately $7.0 million in professional services during fiscal 2007. There are no commitments beyond the twelve-month term of the agreement. There is no guarantee that the Company will be able to successfully negotiate a new contract with Synapse at the end of the current contract period or derive revenue from Synapse after 2007, or any future revenues from Synapse, will be comparable to 2007 revenue levels. Additionally, there is no guarantee that revenues related to Synapse services will be comparable to those generated in the past.

36

SPECIAL NOTE REGARDING FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS

Some of the statements in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and elsewhere constitute forward-looking statements under Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, including statements made with respect to significant customers, revenue, backlog, competitive and strategic initiatives, growth plans, potential stock repurchases, future results, tax consequences and liquidity needs. These statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause results, levels of activity, growth, performance, tax consequences or achievements to be materially different from any future results, levels of activity, growth, performance, tax consequences or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Such factors include, among other things, those listed below, as well as those further set forth under the heading “Business – Factors Affecting Finances, Business Prospects and Stock Volatility” in our 2006 Annual Report on Form 10-K as filed with the SEC on March 14, 2007.

The forward-looking statements included in this Form 10-Q and referred to elsewhere are related to future events or our strategies or future financial performance. In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by terminology such as “may,” “should,” “believe,” “anticipate,” “future,” “forward,” “potential,” “estimate,” “encourage,” “opportunity,” “goal,” “objective,” “quality,” “growth,” “leader,” “could”, “expect,” “intend,” “plan,” “planned” “expand,” “focus,” “build,” “through,” “strategy,” “expiration,” “provide,” “offer,” “maximize,” “allow,” “allowed,” “represent,” “commitment,” “create,” “implement,” “result,” “seeking,” “increase,” “add,” “establish,” “pursue,” “feel,” “work,” “perform,” “make,” “continue,” “can,” “ongoing,” “include” or the negative of such terms or comparable terminology. These forward-looking statements inherently involve certain risks and uncertainties, although they are based on our current plans or assessments which are believed to be reasonable as of the date of this Form 10-Q. Factors that may cause actual results, goals, targets or objectives to differ materially from those contemplated, projected, forecasted, estimated, anticipated, planned or budgeted in such forward-looking statements include, among others, the following possibilities: (1) inability to execute upon growth objectives, including growth in entities acquired by our Company; (2) failure to obtain new customers or retain significant existing customers; (3) the loss of one or more key executives and/or employees; (4) changes in industry trends, such as a decline in the demand for Business Intelligence and Corporate Performance Management solutions, custom development and system integration services and/or delays in industry-wide information technology spending, whether on a temporary or permanent basis and/or delays by customers in initiating new projects or existing project milestones; (5) adverse developments and volatility involving geopolitical or technology market conditions; (6) unanticipated events or the occurrence of fluctuations or variability in the matters identified under “Critical Accounting Policies;” (7) failure of our sales pipeline to be converted to billable work and recorded as revenue; (8) failure of the middle market and the needs of middle-market enterprises for business services to develop as anticipated; (9) inability to recruit and retain professionals with the high level of information technology skills and experience needed to provide our services; (10) failure to expand outsourcing services to generate additional revenue; (11) any changes in ownership of the Company or otherwise that would result in a limitation of the net operating loss carryforward under applicable tax laws; (12) the failure of the marketplace to embrace CPM or BI services; and/or (13) the failure to obtain remaining predecessor entity tax records that are not in our control. In evaluating these statements, you should specifically consider various factors described above as well as the risks outlined under Item I “Business – Factors Affecting Finances, Business Prospects and Stock Volatility” in our 2006 Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on March 14, 2007. These factors may cause our actual results to differ materially from those contemplated, projected, anticipated, planned or budgeted in any such forward-looking statements.

Although we believe that the expectations in the forward-looking statements are reasonable, we cannot guarantee future results, levels of activity, performance, growth, earnings per share or achievements. However, neither we nor any other person assumes responsibility for the accuracy and completeness of such statements. We are under no duty to update any of the forward-looking statements after the date of this Form 10-Q to conform such statements to actual results.

37

ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

Our primary financial instruments include investments in money market funds, short-term municipal bonds, commercial paper and U.S. government securities that are sensitive to market risks and interest rates. The investment portfolio is used to preserve our capital until it is required to fund operations, strategic acquisitions or distributions to stockholders. None of our market-risk sensitive instruments are held for trading purposes. We did not purchase derivative financial instruments in the three- and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2007 and 2006. Should interest rates on the Company’s investments fluctuate by 10% the impact would not be material to the financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

The impact of inflation and changing prices has not been material on revenue or income from continuing operations during the three- and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2007 and 2006.

ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

We maintain disclosure controls and procedures, which we have designed to ensure that material information related to the Company, including our consolidated subsidiaries, is properly identified and evaluated on a regular basis and disclosed in accordance with all applicable laws and regulations.

The President and Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer of Edgewater Technology, Inc. (its principal executive officer and principal financial officer, respectively) have concluded, based on their evaluations as of the end of the period covered by this Report, that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports filed or submitted by it under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission rules and forms, and include controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in such reports is accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Changes in Controls and Procedures

There was no change in the Company's internal control over financial reporting as defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f) during the three months ended September 30, 2007, that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company's internal control over financial reporting.

38

PART II – OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

We are sometimes a party to litigation incidental to our business. We maintain insurance in amounts, with coverages and deductibles, which we believe are reasonable. As of the date of the filing of this Form 10-Q, our Company is not a party to any existing material litigation matters.

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

A restated description of the risk factors associated with our business is included under “Risk Factors” in “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” contained in Item 2 of Part I of this quarterly report. This description includes any material changes to and supersedes the description of the risk factors associated with our business previously disclosed in Item 1A of our 2006 Annual Report on Form 10-K and is incorporated herein by reference.

ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS

As described, in September 2007, the Company issued 233,599 shares of its Common Stock to the former stockholder of Lynx pursuant to the provisions of an Asset Purchase Agreement. The issuance of the foregoing shares of Common Stock was exempt from registration pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. In each case, there was no general solicitation or advertising, the number of recipients of such unregistered shares was limited and such recipients are accredited and/or sophisticated.

ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES

Not applicable as our Company does not have any senior securities issued or outstanding.

ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS

None.

ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION

None.

ITEM 6. EXHIBITS

31.1	13a-14 Certification – President and Chief Executive Officer*
31.2	13a-14 Certification – Chief Financial Officer*
32	Section 1350 Certification*

* - Filed herein.

39

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

	EDGEWATER TECHNOLOGY, INC.
Date: November 14, 2007	/s/ SHIRLEY SINGLETON
	Shirley Singleton
	President and Chief Executive Officer
Date: November 14, 2007	/s/ KEVIN R. RHODES
	Kevin R. Rhodes
	Chief Financial Officer
	(principal financial and accounting officer)

40

EX-31.1

Exhibit 31.1

13a-14 CERTIFICATION

I, Shirley Singleton, the President and Chief Executive Officer of Edgewater Technology, Inc. (the “Company”), certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Edgewater Technology, Inc. (the “Company”);

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operation and cash flow of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The Company’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the Company and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, to the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The Company’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Company’s auditors and the Audit Committee of the Company’s Board of Directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Company’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: November 14, 2007	/s/ SHIRLEY SINGLETON
	Shirley Singleton
	President and Chief Executive Officer

EX-31.2

Exhibit 31.2

13a-14 CERTIFICATION

I, Kevin R. Rhodes, the Chief Financial Officer of Edgewater Technology, Inc. (the “Company”), certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Edgewater Technology, Inc. (the “Company”);

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operation and cash flow of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The Company’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the Company and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, to the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The Company’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Company’s auditors and the Audit Committee of the Company’s Board of Directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Company’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: November 14, 2007	/s/ KEVIN R. RHODES
	Kevin R. Rhodes
	Chief Financial Officer
	(principal financial and accounting officer)

EX-32

Exhibit 32

1350 CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Public Company Accounting Reform and Investor Protection Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted), Shirley Singleton, the President and Chief Executive Officer of Edgewater Technology, Inc. (the “Company”), and Kevin R. Rhodes, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies that, to the best of her or his knowledge:

The Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2007, to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32 (the “Periodic Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and the information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition of the Company at the end of the period covered by the Periodic Report and results of operations of the Company for the period covered by the Periodic Report.

Date: November 14, 2007	/s/ SHIRLEY SINGLETON
	Shirley Singleton
	President and Chief Executive Officer
Date: November 14, 2007	/s/ KEVIN R. RHODES
	Kevin R. Rhodes
	Chief Financial Officer
	(principal financial and accounting officer)