Commitments and Contingencies	3 Months Ended
Mar. 31, 2016
Commitments and Contingencies Disclosure [Abstract]
Commitments and Contingencies	Note Payable On October 2, 2015, the Company entered into a $35,677 note payable with a financial institution. The term of the note is for a period of one year and is payable in 10 monthly installments of $3,089 at an interest rate of 6.35%. The balance due on the note payable as of March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015 was $15,160 and $24,202, respectively. Stock Price Guarantee In connection with the Company’s advance royalties with a client, the Company guaranteed that shares of common stock would sell for at least $6.00 per share. If the shares are not at the required $6.00 per share when they are sold, the Company has the option of issuing additional shares at their fair value or making a cash payment for the difference between the guaranteed price per share and the fair value of the stock. As of March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, the stock price guarantee was $838,557 and $913,582, respectively, as the Company’s stock price was below $6.00 per share at March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, although some or all of the stock may already be sold and no longer subject to a guaranty and any required payment would be disputed by the Company. For the three months ended March 31, 2016 and 2015, the Company recorded an unrealized gain on stock price guarantee of $75,025 and $51,310, respectively. Legal Matters In the normal course of business, the Company periodically becomes involved in litigation. As of March 31, 2016, in the opinion of management, the Company had no pending litigation that would have a material adverse effect on the Company's consolidated financial position, results of operations, or cash flows. The Company commenced on December 20, 2013 patent infringement litigation against eBay, Inc. (Paid, Inc. v. eBay, Inc.; CV No. 4:13-cv-40151-TSH) in the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts Central Division. On September 30, 2014, PAID and eBay filed a joint motion to stay the district court litigation pending completion of eBay’s petitions for covered business method review that were filed with the Patent and Trial and Appeal Board (“PTAB”). On September 30, 2014 the PTAB announced that it had granted petitions filed by eBay for covered business method review of PAID’s United States Patent Nos. 8,635,150, 8,521,642, 8,352,357, and 7,930,237, entitled “Method and System for Improved Online Auction” (collectively, the “Online Auction Patents”). On June 9, 2015, the Company and eBay, Inc. presented oral arguments to the Patent Trials Appeals Board. On September 16, 2015, the PTAB entered a final ruling that the claims of the Online Auction Patents lacked patent eligible subject matter. Pursuant to a settlement with eBay (discussed below), the Company has decided not to appeal the PTAB’s final ruling. Consequently, the claims of the Online Auction Patents are not valid. The PTAB’s final ruling does not affect the validity of PAID’s United States Patent No. 7,324,968 or PAID’S United States Patent Pending both entitled “Method and System for Improved Online Auction” (collectively, the “Non-Asserted Intellectual Property”) which were not subject to the petitions for covered business method review filed by eBay. This litigation has been settled pursuant to a Confidential Settlement and License Agreement dated March 11, 2016. Under the agreement, the Company received $53,500 after costs as full and final payment for such settlement of the lawsuit and non-exclusive licensing of the Company’s patents. The Company recorded an “other receivable” for the agreed upon amount as of March 31, 2016. The payment was received in full during the month of April 2016. Indemnities and Guarantees The Company has made certain indemnities and guarantees, under which it may be required to make payments to a guaranteed or indemnified party, in relation to certain actions or transactions. The Company indemnifies its directors, officers, employees and agents, as permitted under the laws of the State of Delaware. In connection with its facility lease, the Company has agreed to indemnify its lessor for certain claims arising from the use of the facilities. The duration of the guarantees and indemnities varies, and is generally tied to the life of the agreement. These guarantees and indemnities do not provide for any limitation of the maximum potential future payments the Company could be obligated to make. Historically, the Company has not been obligated nor incurred any payments for these obligations and, therefore, no liabilities have been recorded for these indemnities and guarantees in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.

Commitments and Contingencies

3 Months Ended

Mar. 31, 2016

Commitments and Contingencies Disclosure [Abstract]

Note Payable

On October 2, 2015, the Company entered into a $35,677 note payable with a financial institution. The term of the note is for a period of one year and is payable in 10 monthly installments of $3,089 at an interest rate of 6.35%. The balance due on the note payable as of March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015 was $15,160 and $24,202, respectively.

Stock Price Guarantee

In connection with the Company’s advance royalties with a client, the Company guaranteed that shares of common stock would sell for at least $6.00 per share. If the shares are not at the required $6.00 per share when they are sold, the Company has the option of issuing additional shares at their fair value or making a cash payment for the difference between the guaranteed price per share and the fair value of the stock. As of March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, the stock price guarantee was $838,557 and $913,582, respectively, as the Company’s stock price was below $6.00 per share at March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, although some or all of the stock may already be sold and no longer subject to a guaranty and any required payment would be disputed by the Company. For the three months ended March 31, 2016 and 2015, the Company recorded an unrealized gain on stock price guarantee of $75,025 and $51,310, respectively.

Legal Matters

In the normal course of business, the Company periodically becomes involved in litigation. As of March 31, 2016, in the opinion of management, the Company had no pending litigation that would have a material adverse effect on the Company's consolidated financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.

The Company commenced on December 20, 2013 patent infringement litigation against eBay, Inc. (Paid, Inc. v. eBay, Inc.; CV No. 4:13-cv-40151-TSH) in the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts Central Division. On September 30, 2014, PAID and eBay filed a joint motion to stay the district court litigation pending completion of eBay’s petitions for covered business method review that were filed with the Patent and Trial and Appeal Board (“PTAB”). On September 30, 2014 the PTAB announced that it had granted petitions filed by eBay for covered business method review of PAID’s United States Patent Nos. 8,635,150, 8,521,642, 8,352,357, and 7,930,237, entitled “Method and System for Improved Online Auction” (collectively, the “Online Auction Patents”). On June 9, 2015, the Company and eBay, Inc. presented oral arguments to the Patent Trials Appeals Board. On September 16, 2015, the PTAB entered a final ruling that the claims of the Online Auction Patents lacked patent eligible subject matter. Pursuant to a settlement with eBay (discussed below), the Company has decided not to appeal the PTAB’s final ruling. Consequently, the claims of the Online Auction Patents are not valid. The PTAB’s final ruling does not affect the validity of PAID’s United States Patent No. 7,324,968 or PAID’S United States Patent Pending both entitled “Method and System for Improved Online Auction” (collectively, the “Non-Asserted Intellectual Property”) which were not subject to the petitions for covered business method review filed by eBay. This litigation has been settled pursuant to a Confidential Settlement and License Agreement dated March 11, 2016. Under the agreement, the Company received $53,500 after costs as full and final payment for such settlement of the lawsuit and non-exclusive licensing of the Company’s patents. The Company recorded an “other receivable” for the agreed upon amount as of March 31, 2016. The payment was received in full during the month of April 2016.

Indemnities and Guarantees

The Company has made certain indemnities and guarantees, under which it may be required to make payments to a guaranteed or indemnified party, in relation to certain actions or transactions. The Company indemnifies its directors, officers, employees and agents, as permitted under the laws of the State of Delaware. In connection with its facility lease, the Company has agreed to indemnify its lessor for certain claims arising from the use of the facilities. The duration of the guarantees and indemnities varies, and is generally tied to the life of the agreement. These guarantees and indemnities do not provide for any limitation of the maximum potential future payments the Company could be obligated to make. Historically, the Company has not been obligated nor incurred any payments for these obligations and, therefore, no liabilities have been recorded for these indemnities and guarantees in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.