-----BEGIN PRIVACY-ENHANCED MESSAGE----- Proc-Type: 2001,MIC-CLEAR Originator-Name: webmaster@www.sec.gov Originator-Key-Asymmetric: MFgwCgYEVQgBAQICAf8DSgAwRwJAW2sNKK9AVtBzYZmr6aGjlWyK3XmZv3dTINen TWSM7vrzLADbmYQaionwg5sDW3P6oaM5D3tdezXMm7z1T+B+twIDAQAB MIC-Info: RSA-MD5,RSA, IUY5ironynkGS6iGdYtGvQUvzxm8Wu0oaA3ha+YZxuRl+nhGRzMaCJgsebhk6L6G V26u/MpyWTcOU7i9hXygMw== 0001019687-98-000209.txt : 19980817 0001019687-98-000209.hdr.sgml : 19980817 ACCESSION NUMBER: 0001019687-98-000209 CONFORMED SUBMISSION TYPE: 10KSB/A PUBLIC DOCUMENT COUNT: 7 CONFORMED PERIOD OF REPORT: 19971231 FILED AS OF DATE: 19980814 SROS: NASD FILER: COMPANY DATA: COMPANY CONFORMED NAME: BRISTOL RETAIL SOLUTIONS INC CENTRAL INDEX KEY: 0001016657 STANDARD INDUSTRIAL CLASSIFICATION: WHOLESALE-PROFESSIONAL & COMMERCIAL EQUIPMENT & SUPPLIES [5040] IRS NUMBER: 582235556 STATE OF INCORPORATION: DE FISCAL YEAR END: 1231 FILING VALUES: FORM TYPE: 10KSB/A SEC ACT: SEC FILE NUMBER: 000-21633 FILM NUMBER: 98687127 BUSINESS ADDRESS: STREET 1: 5000 BIRCH ST STREET 2: STE 205 CITY: NEWPORT BEACH STATE: CA ZIP: 92660 BUSINESS PHONE: 7144750800 MAIL ADDRESS: STREET 1: 5000 BIRCH ST STREET 2: STE 205 CITY: NEWPORT BEACH STATE: CA ZIP: 92660 FORMER COMPANY: FORMER CONFORMED NAME: BRISTOL TECHNOLOGY SYSTEMS INC DATE OF NAME CHANGE: 19960924 10KSB/A 1 AMENDMENT #4 FOR YEAR END 12/31/97 U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549 FORM 10-KSB/A AMENDMENT NO.4 (Mark One) [X] ANNUAL REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1997 [ ] TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the transition period from_________ to___________ Commission file number 0-21633 BRISTOL RETAIL SOLUTIONS, INC. (Name of Small Business Issuer in its Charter) DELAWARE 58-2235556 (State or Other Jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) Incorporation or Organization) 5000 BIRCH STREET, SUITE 205, NEWPORT BEACH, CALIFORNIA 92660 (Address of Principal Executive Offices) (Zip Code) (714) 475-0800 (Issuer's Telephone Number Including Area Code) Securities registered under Section 12(b) of the Exchange Act: NONE Securities registered under Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act: Title of each class ------------------- COMMON STOCK, $.001 PAR VALUE CLASS A REDEEMABLE COMMON STOCK PURCHASE WARRANTS Check whether the issuer (1) filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act during the past 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes [X] No [ ] Check if there is no disclosure of delinquent filers in response to Item 405 of Regulation S-B contained in this form, and no disclosure will be contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in the definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-KSB or any amendment to this Form 10-KSB. [X] State issuer's revenues for its most recent fiscal year: $21,088,487 The aggregate market value of the registrant's voting Common Stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant was approximately $10,444,096 (computed using the closing price of $3.25 per share of Common Stock on December 12, 1997 as reported by The Nasdaq Stock Market, based on the assumption that directors and officers and more than 5% stockholders are affiliates). The Company has no non-voting Common Stock. (APPLICABLE ONLY TO CORPORATE REGISTRANTS) There were 5,556,746 shares of the registrant's Common Stock, par value $.001 per share, and 718,750 of the registrant's Class A Redeemable Common Stock Purchase Warrants outstanding on February 27, 1998. DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE Portions of the registrant's definitive Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders scheduled to be held May 15, 1998, which Proxy Statement will be filed no later than 120 days after the close of the registrant's year ended December 31, 1997, are incorporated by reference in Part III of this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB. Transitional Small Business Disclosure Format (check one): Yes [ ] No [X] PART I ITEM 1. DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS. GENERAL The Company is a dealer of retail point-of-sale ("POS") systems in the United States with operations in 17 cities in eight states. The Company sells, installs and supports POS systems, which retail establishments use to collect and process data at the "point-of-sale" during sales transactions with customers. The Company has installed systems in more than 15,400 retail locations, primarily in supermarkets, table-service and fast food restaurants, and golf courses and resorts, which are the three markets of the retail industry on which the Company currently focuses. The Company installs POS systems manufactured by NCR Corporation ("NCR"), International Business Machines Corp. ("IBM"), Matsushita Electronic Corporation of America ("Panasonic"), ICL Retail Systems ("ICL-Fujitsu"), Micro Systems, Incorporated ("Micros"), and several other manufacturers. The Company has developed and is marketing software specifically designed for golf course and resort applications and has license agreements with several software companies for specific applications for its other target markets. The POS computer systems installed by the Company serve a range of valuable functions required by retailers to be competitive today. These include speedier customer checkout service, tracking customer purchases and preferences, monitoring inventory on a real-time basis, integrating scanning, promotional and electronic funds transfer (EFT) systems and security monitoring. Retailers who outgrow the limitations of electronic cash registers (ECRs) represent a major source of new revenue for the Company. The Company also expects additional demand for its products to come from retailers seeking to upgrade existing, under-performing POS systems as well as from new retailers. The Company plans to become a national distribution organization for POS systems through selective acquisitions of independent dealers and systems integrators that sell, install, and support POS systems for use in retail establishments. The Company has acquired six dealers since its establishment in April 1996. The following table sets forth certain information with respect to the Company's acquisitions to date.
ACQUISITIONS ACQUISITIONS DATE BUSINESS LOCATIONS - ------------------------------------- ----------- ---------------- ------------------------- Cash Registers, Incorporated ("CRI") June 1996 POS Dealer Kentucky/Ohio Automated Register Systems, Inc. ("ARS") December 1996 POS Dealer Washington MicroData, Inc. ("MICRODATA") April 1997 POS Dealer Illinois Smyth Systems, Inc. ("SMYTH") May 1997 POS Dealer and VAR Ohio/California/Colorado/ Utah Electronic Business Machines, Inc. ("EBM") June 1997 POS Dealer Indiana Pacific Cash Register and Computer, Inc. ("PCR") August 1997 POS Dealer California
SEE ACCOMPANYING NOTE TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS. INDUSTRY OVERVIEW The driving forces in retailing in the United States are the need to attract and retain new customers with a variety of goods and services that meet the ever-changing tastes of consumers, to increase the average sale per visit, and to maximize internal productivity and efficiency in order to generate higher operating profits. Retailers need the ability to quickly identify the buying history and needs of the consumer. Access to such information allows retailers to match or to adjust their current products and services to the ever-changing demands of consumers. These trends have accelerated the requirement for enterprise-wide access to information and have heightened the demand for automated information systems. The Company believes this is due, in part, to the shift in consumer preferences toward variety, value, and convenience. Furthermore, consumers are demanding speedier checkout times, the ability to accept credit and debit cards at the point-of-sale, and the convenience of performing a POS transaction without human intervention. 2 Retailers have long sought new uses of technology to help them improve efficiency. The first specialized apparatus was the cash register. Electronic cash registers (ECR) used by many retailers are incapable of handling the increasing need to capture and process detailed information or the demand for faster service. For many types of retailers, automation did not make economic or business sense until the price of computing power and the cost of implementation declined. Computing power has become increasingly flexible and easy to use. Today, the computer has made the modern POS system practical, providing the means to capture and process enormous amounts of information while at the same time performing the basic cash control duties of a cash register. The initial investment in a POS system is offset by reduced labor and transaction costs. Retail automation has become an important tool for creating strategic advantage. There is a growing trend among retailers to implement local area networks ("LANs") and wide area networks ("WANs") in retail establishments. The LANs serve a range of valuable functions, including speeding customer checkout service, tracking customer purchases and preferences, monitoring inventory on a real-time basis, integrating scanning, promotional and electronic funds transfer systems, security monitoring, and in-store accounting. WANs integrate several LANs into a corporate headquarters' information system to permit management to review individual store operations by analyzing the data that a sophisticated POS system produces. Based on industry surveys and its own operating experience, the Company believes that as a consequence of competitive pressures within the retail industry and the Year 2000 problem, demand for POS systems is strong and will be into the next millenium. The Company believes that the majority of retailers surveyed plan to increase capital spending and increase retail automation expenditures as a percentage of sales. Based on industry surveys, the Company believes that retail automation spending increased by 3% in 1996 over the previous year and is estimated to have increased by 11% in 1997 to 0.82% of sales among responding retailers. Based on these surveys, the Company also believes that average retailers dedicate approximately 23% of total information technology funds to POS systems. The Company asserts that 30% of retailers responding were planning to buy or upgrade POS systems in 1998 due to retail mergers, expansion plans and the Year 2000 problem. The Company targets supermarkets, table-service and fast food restaurants, and golf courses and resorts. The Company believes the portion of the annual market for POS systems addressable by the Company and other dealers is approximately $350 million for supermarkets, $1.2 billion for table-service and fast food restaurants, and $75 million for golf courses and resorts. In addition, the Company believes that the total annual market for POS system maintenance and related services is approximately 35% of systems sales. The Company believes that approximately 800,000 units (POS systems and ECRs) are sold per year. In 1996, there were more than 5.0 million POS systems and ECRs in use in the United States. The Company believes that only 70% of respondents have an automated POS system in place. Of those with a POS system, 55% said the average age of their system was less than six years. The Company believes the current average life of a POS system is seven years. However, the Company anticipates that retailers with ECRs or older POS systems will replace their units or systems more rapidly than in the past in order to take advantage of new product features that are being introduced more frequently than in the past. The channels of distribution for retail automation systems in the United States are fragmented and overlapping. The two principal distribution channels for POS systems and ECR products to reach the end user currently are: (i) the "Direct" channel and (ii) the "Indirect" channel. The Direct channel consists of manufacturers that sell directly to large, national "major retail" chains. The Direct channel represents less than half of all units sold. The Indirect channel consists of a variety of independent businesses, which sell to all types of retail end-users. The two principle components of the Indirect channel are dealers and Value Added-Resellers (VARs). Dealers in the Indirect channel generally take title to equipment that they resell and do not, as a rule, engage in software development. In contrast, VARs are typically compensated with a commission from the manufacturer and need not take title to equipment or provide hardware service. VARs sometimes also act as software developers. All manufacturers use dealers or VARs to distribute at least a portion of their products to the retail market, and some manufacturers use dealers or VARs as their exclusive means of distributing their products. The Company believes that by the Year 2000, POS dealers and VARs will sell the majority of POS systems because major suppliers are relying increasingly on the Indirect channel for distribution since dealers and VARs can operate at a lower cost than the major manufacturers. 3 The typical POS or ECR dealer is privately held, concentrates on only one or two manufacturers for its key products and sells, and services those products on a local basis. Typical dealership functions are sales, in-house and on-site service, and administration. Based on the Company's experience in evaluating dealers as acquisition candidates, the Company believes that the typical dealer derives its revenue from the sale of hardware, software, and service. The Company believes there are more than 3,000 independent POS and ECR dealers in the United States that sell to customers in one or several segments of the retail industry. Because restaurants and supermarkets have been among the first markets in the retail industry to adopt retail automation tools, the majority of POS and ECR dealers have some sales to one or both of these markets. Systems integrators, who integrate different manufacturers' hardware and software products into one system, also play a role in distributing POS systems. Systems integrators generally market turnkey solutions directly to retailers, primarily through their own sales force of specialists with in-depth knowledge of their targeted markets. They seek to deliver solutions for many of the demanding operating challenges facing retailers in today's competitive environment. The Company believes its expanding network of POS dealers will provide additional POS sales leads and on-site service opportunities for the Company's systems integration applications for golf courses and resorts. The Company believes that there is a direct relationship between the size of the retailer and the strategy it employs in purchasing a POS system. Large chains tend to purchase system components directly from manufacturers and utilize an in-house staff to perform system integration. Smaller retailers tend to buy integrated systems from a single source. The Company expects manufacturers to increasingly concentrate their direct sales efforts on the largest retail chains and to rely increasingly on the Indirect channel to reach the balance of the retail marketplace. The Company also expects a fundamental shift in marketing strategies to develop as retail automation systems become more complex as software, installation, maintenance support, and systems integration as opposed to hardware become a larger share of the total cost of purchase. The Company believes that consolidation among potential POS end-users could impact the number of participants and the structure of the distribution system for POS systems. There has been an increase in consolidation activity among retailers in recent years, including a record-breaking 180 transactions involving the merger or acquisition of restaurant companies in 1997, following 177 mergers in 1996. Although less intensive, similar consolidation is taking place among supermarkets and grocery stores as evidenced by the combinations of regional chains such as Safeway Stores/Vons Cos. and Smith's Food & Drug/Smitty's Food Stores, among others. The Company believes that increasingly sophisticated and geographically dispersed retailers will expect to leverage volume purchases in order to lower operating costs, and that a national dealer will be able offer the convenience and consistency that local vendors cannot match. For the year ended December 31, 1997, approximately 58% of the Company's total revenues were attributable to POS sales and support, approximately 4% were attributable to systems integration sales and support and approximately 2% were attributable to ECR sales and support. The remaining sales were attributable to maintenance service contracts and supplies. COMPANY STRATEGY The Company has established a strategic plan to develop a national organization for the distribution of POS systems through selective acquisitions of independent dealers and systems integrators who sell, install, and support POS systems at retail establishments. The Company's objective is to leverage already established regional channels, customer relationships, and market expertise to achieve synergistic growth of revenue and improve profit performance. The Company currently focuses on sales to supermarkets, table-service and fast food restaurants, and golf courses and resorts. These groups were chosen because the Company believes they represent large vertical business segments that offer the best opportunity for future sales growth and improved margins. GROWTH STRATEGIES PURSUING STRATEGIC ACQUISITIONS. The Company intends to capitalize upon the significant consolidation opportunities available in the highly fragmented POS systems dealer industry by acquiring additional dealers and improving their performance and profitability through the implementation of the Company's operating strategies. One of the Company's primary goals is to establish, prior to the end of 1999, a national network of operations that will enhance its ability to attract regional and national retailers in the three markets the Company has targeted, to its customer base. Generally, the regional and national retailers are either franchisee store owners or corporate-owned stores such as Cinnabon, Certified Grocers, Fazoli's or Wendy's that have stores throughout the United States. The Company believes that the consolidation of acquired dealers enables it to capitalize on the experience and customer contacts of the personnel of acquired companies, eliminate redundant costs, and achieve greater productivity and more effective utilization of resources. The Company estimates that there are approximately 300 POS dealers in the United States with annual revenue in excess of $2.0 million each. 4 The Company is pursuing a dual priority acquisition focus of increasing its substantial West Coast and Mid-West market penetration while seeking to acquire dealerships in other strategically located geographic markets not served by the Company. The Company intends to focus on acquisition targets that are profitable at the anticipated time of acquisition and that the Company believes will maintain profitability after they are integrated into the Company's operations. The Company believes it will be regarded as an attractive acquirer by POS systems dealers because (i) the Company's operating strategies enable the current owners and managers of acquired dealerships to continue their involvement in dealership operations; (ii) the ability of management and employees of an acquired dealership to participate in the Company's growth and expansion through potential stock ownership and career advancement opportunities; and (iii) the ability to offer the owners of acquired dealerships liquidity through the receipt of Common Stock or cash. OFFERING ADDITIONAL PRODUCT LINES AND SERVICES. When permitted by manufacturer agreements, the Company plans to offer throughout its existing and acquired dealerships, product lines that previously have been offered only at certain of its locations. The Company also intends to create a uniform group of products and support services that can be provided from each of its locations. In addition, the Company expects to increase revenue and improve profitability through enhanced financing packages, such as a customized lease program, and long-term service and support agreements designed to better serve customers. Operating Strategies ACHIEVING OPERATING EFFICIENCIES AND SYNERGIES. The Company plans to further increase the operating efficiencies of its dealerships to enhance internal growth and profitability. The Company is centralizing certain administrative functions at the corporate level, such as accounting, finance, purchasing, insurance coverage, employee benefits, inventory control, warehousing and distribution. Centralization of functions should serve to reduce duplicative expenses and permit the dealerships to benefit from a level of scale and expertise that would otherwise be unavailable to them individually. For example, the Company expects to realize cost savings from reduced inventory carrying costs through a centralized warehouse, the exchange of technical knowledge on the equipment and software it sells and the expanded opportunity for volume discounts on selected products and supplies, however, there can be no assurance that this opportunity can be realized. By eliminating responsibility for administrative functions, the dealerships can focus their full attention on generating revenue from sales and support activities. UTILIZING TECHNOLOGY THROUGHOUT OPERATIONS. The Company is installing a management information system to enhance the Company's ability to integrate successfully and quickly the operations of acquired dealerships and future acquisitions. In addition to handling the range of centralized functions, the management information system also will facilitate the interchange of information and enhance cross-selling opportunities throughout the Company, however, there can be no assurance that this opportunity can be realized. It also will serve as a management tool to monitor performance at the dealer and distributor locations and quickly identify those situations requiring additional attention. CREATING A BRAND IDENTITY. To generate greater recognition and receptivity for the Company and its products to targeted retailers, the Company plans during the second half of 1998, to convert the existing business names of companies it has acquired to Bristol Retail Solutions and to undertake a brand identity program supported by public relations, advertising and direct mail. EMPHASIZING CUSTOMER SATISFACTION AND LOYALTY. The Company seeks to achieve a high level of customer satisfaction and to enhance long-term loyalty of its customers by offering the systems that best serve their needs while supporting each sale with the highest quality of service and training. The Company maintains ongoing training programs for its service and support personnel to enable them to assess effectively customer requirements and deliver effective solutions to retailers. IMPLEMENTING BEST PRACTICES. The Company strives to implement the "best practices" of its dealers. These practices include successful selling techniques and incentives, programs to promote increased maintenance and support services, and employee motivation programs. 5 PRODUCTS AND SERVICES SYSTEMS A POS system is used at the "point-of-sale" in a retail establishment to collect and process data with communications capability. A POS system leads or prompts the retail clerk through a sales transaction with a customer and collects detailed information, including credit information, about the transaction or possibly, consumer preferences. Standard components of a POS system include a display terminal to view the transaction, a keyboard for data processing, a scanner (supermarket applications), a credit or debit card reader and coordinating communications, and software to guide the clerk through the entire transaction. A POS system leads or prompts the retail clerk through a sales transaction with a customer and collects detailed information, including credit information about the transaction. Typically, a number of sophisticated POS "registers" are installed in a retail establishment, which allows multiple departments or locations to enter transactions simultaneously. SERVICES AND SUPPLIES The Company offers its customers a variety of value-added services, such as consulting, integration, and support services. Consulting and integration services include system design, performance analysis and security analysis; migration planning, product procurement, configuration and testing; and systems installation and implementation. Through the acquisition of Smyth Systems, Inc, the Company believes that it will be in a position to expand on Smyth Systems, Inc.'s current capacity to provide systems integration services for golf courses and resorts and offer such services to a broader range of customers. The Company also offers its customers continued support, customer service, and supplies from installation through the life span of the products it sells. Support services include network management, 7 days x 24-hour "help-desk" support and enhancement, and maintenance and repair of POS systems. The Company currently is consolidating its support and customer service efforts in order to enable the Company to provide a consistent national level of support to its customers. Additionally, the Company is working with a large third-party POS supplies vendor to establish a strong centralized telemarketing capability for marketing supplies. SALES, MARKETING AND DISTRIBUTION The Company identifies its customers in a number of ways, including referrals from existing customers, advertising in local Yellow Pages and industry publications, through the Company's direct sales personnel, by means of customer upgrades and replacements, and referrals from suppliers. Once the Company identifies a potential customer, the lead is assigned to a Company sales person who will follow-through and attempt to complete the sale. It is the sales person's responsibility to identify the needs of the customer and to sell to the customer a total POS systems solution. The Company currently has a small telemarketing sales staff selling supplies to a limited number of customers. The Company intends to expand this sales approach into selling supplies company-wide as well as to generate new sales leads for POS systems. The Company, has periodically made marketing presentations at several trade shows for the golf and resorts market. The Company intends to explore other avenues to sell and market its products. CUSTOMERS The Company concentrates its sales efforts on three principle markets of the retail industry, which are supermarkets, fast food and table service restaurants, and golf courses/resorts. Typically, the Company's customers tend to be a regional franchisee or a group of several stores with the same owner. Generally, when the Company receives an order for POS systems, it will be for a group of stores to be installed over a relatively short period of time. After completion of the installation of these stores, future revenues from the customer will be for maintenance service contracts or supplies. The majority of the Company's customers in the supermarket market are regional supermarket chains and ethnic supermarkets. A typical installation order for a supermarket would be for three to five lanes, with each lane typically consisting of a display screen, cash drawer, scanner, printer and electronic funds transfer terminal. Other possible devices to be installed could include coin dispensers, hand held scanners, and pole displays. All of these devices are connected to a LAN and are supported by POS software, which captures the information, calculates totals, prints out the transaction receipt for the customer, and interfaces with the retailer's financial and management information systems. 6 The Company also sells, installs and supports POS systems for both table service and fast food restaurants. Typical among the Company's customers are franchisee restaurants for many major fast-food chains. The typical installation order for these restaurants consists of the countertop POS cash registers with drawers, kitchen printers, drive through systems, and local management servers. In addition, the Company also installs the operating software for these POS systems. The average installation order for table service restaurants, where customers order their meals from a waiter or waitress as opposed to at a counter, consists of touch screen terminals at one or two floor stations and another one at the bar area if there is one. In addition there is normally a printer installed in the kitchen. The third market targeted by the Company is golf courses and resorts. In this market the Company installs products used to automate the retail requirements of a golf course or resort, which include dining room activities, checkout for golf or pro shop merchandise and other requirements such as setting and managing a schedule for tee times. No customer accounted for more than 10% of the Company's total revenue for the year ended December 31, 1997. Sales to Seed Restaurant Group, accounted for approximately 33% of total revenue for the period from inception (April 3, 1996) to December 31, 1996. COMPETITION The POS industry is highly fragmented and competitive. Competitive factors within the industry include product offerings and prices, quality of products, customer service levels, reputation, and geographic location of dealers. The Company primarily competes with independent POS dealers, many of which have greater financial resources available to them than does the Company. In addition, some manufacturers of POS equipment and software compete in certain product areas by distributing their products directly to the end-users that the Company serves. The Company's ability to make acquisitions also will be subject to competition. The Company believes that other independent POS dealers may seek growth through consolidation with entities other than the Company during the next few years. In addition, no assurance can be given that the major manufacturers will not choose to effect or expand the distribution of their products through their own wholesale organizations or to increase distribution directly to many of the retail accounts of the Company in the markets served by the Company. SUPPLIERS A substantial portion of the Company's total revenue is and will be derived from the sale of POS systems, ECRs, and related equipment, none of which are manufactured by the Company. The Company's business is dependent upon close relationships with manufacturers of POS equipment and the Company's ability to purchase equipment in sufficient quantities necessary and upon competitive terms in order to enable it to meet the needs of its end-user customers. During the year ended December 31, 1997, the Company purchased a significant portion of the hardware products that it resold from Panasonic, ERC, and NCR who as manufacturers and suppliers to the Company are some of the best-qualified to meet the needs of our customers. Sales of products purchased from Panasonic, ERC Parts, Inc. ("ERC") and NCR accounted for approximately 32% of total revenue for the year ended December 31, 1997, with sales of Panasonic and NCR products accounting for 16% and 15% of the Company's total revenue in that year, respectively. The Company has supply agreements with these and other manufacturers and suppliers such as IBM, ICL-Fujitsu and Micros. The agreements are non-exclusive, may have geographic limitations and may have renewable one-year terms, depending on if the Company achieves a previously-agreed-to procurement quota. Geographical limitations are the assignment of sales territories that define the municipalities and states where the Company subsidiaries can sell a manufacturer's hardware or software. The actual sales territories for each manufacturer is subsidiary specific and some subsidiaries may not have permission to sell hardware or software of certain manufacturers in certain regions or territories of the country. The Company's strategy is to develop long-term relationships with quality and brand-recognizable manufacturers such as NCR and Panasonic with the goal of establishing a standard product offering for our customers. There can be no assurance that the relationships with these and other manufacturers and suppliers will continue or that the Company's supply requirements can be met in the future. The Company's inability to obtain equipment, software, parts or supplies on competitive terms from its current or other major manufacturers could have a material adverse effect on the Company's business, results of operations, financial condition, and cash flows. 7 SEASONALITY The Company's business can be subject to seasonal influences. The POS dealers and systems integrators which the Company has acquired to date typically have had lower revenue in the quarters ending March 31 and December 31 primarily due to the lower level of new store openings or replacement of existing POS systems by customers. The Company believes that this pattern of seasonality will continue in the foreseeable future. RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT As a systems integrator, the Company offers completely integrated software and hardware systems that include financial, operational, and information processing capabilities for its golf course and resort customers. The core software components have previously been developed and annual research and development expenditures are normally expended for system enhancements and specific customer requirements. The Company spent $554,000 in research and development for the year ended December 31, 1997. There were no research and development costs for the period from inception (April 3, 1996) to December 31, 1996. EMPLOYEES As of February 27, 1998, the Company had 226 full-time and 15 part-time employees, of whom 143 were employed in customer services, 44 in finance and administrative services, and 54 in sales and marketing. Of the total full-time employees, 6 were employed at the Company's corporate office, 76 were employed at CRI (including MicroData and EBM), 32 were employed at ARS, 88 were employed at Smyth and 24 were employed at PCR. No employee of the Company is covered by a collective bargaining agreement or is represented by a labor union. The Company considers its employee relations to be good. ITEM 2. DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY. The Company's general policy is to lease, rather than own, its business locations. The Company leases numerous properties for administration, sales and service, and distribution functions. The terms vary under the respective leases, although, in general, the Company's lease agreements require it to pay its proportionate share of taxes, common area expenses, insurance, and related costs of such rental properties. The Company leases its 3,980 square foot headquarters facility in Newport Beach, California. The Company also leases approximately 38,400 square feet of office and warehouse facilities in Kentucky, Illinois, Indiana and Ohio for its CRI operations (including facilities utilized by MicroData and EBM), of which 6,900 square feet is leased from Coye D. King, a director of CRI, and 12,400 is leased from Floyd Shirrell, the former owner of EBM. The Company's ARS operations utilize approximately 11,800 square feet of leased property, which includes an approximately 11,158 square foot office facility in Seattle, Washington which is leased from certain of the officers of ARS. The lease expires in December 2003. The Company's Smyth subsidiary leases approximately 29,700 square feet of office and warehouse facilities in Canton, Ohio and Irvine, California. The Company's PCR subsidiary in San Francisco, California leases approximately a 7,000 square foot office and warehouse facility. In connection with the proposed move of CRI from its current location in London, Kentucky, the Company has agreed to negotiate in good faith a definitive lease agreement with Stephen King and Andrew King, Vice Presidents of CRI, as lessors, whereby the lessors will lease to CRI up to 12,000 square feet of office and warehouse space in a new, yet to be constructed, office complex in London, Kentucky. Certain terms of the lease have already been agreed to, and it is expected that when signed, the lease will be for ten years and the base rental rate will be $6.00, $8.00 and $10.00 per square feet for years one, two and three through ten, respectively. The Company expects that the remaining terms of the lease will be competitive and as favorable to the Company as those which could be obtained from unrelated third parties. Upon commencement of the lease for the new office complex, the monthly lease for CRI's current space in London, Kentucky will be terminated without penalty. The Company believes that the terms of the contract are equivalent to or more favorable than those that would be obtained under an arm's-length transaction. The Company believes that its leased facilities, and the anticipated lease of the new office complex in London, Kentucky, are adequate for its present needs and that suitable additional or replacement space will be available on commercially reasonable terms, as required. 8 ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS. The Company's subsidiaries have been from time to time a party to various lawsuits and other matters involving ordinary and routine claims arising in the normal course of business. In the opinion of management of the Company and its counsel, although the outcomes of these claims and suits are not presently determinable, in the aggregate they should not have a material adverse affect on the Company's business, financial position or results of operations. In September 1993, a judgement was entered in Bell Circuit Court, Kentucky, on behalf of James J. Kreuger, a former employee of CRI, against CRI and Coye D. King and Barbara King, former stockholders of CRI, in the amount of $107,726 and accrued interest. The judgement arises from an alleged partnership formed by the Kings and Mr. Kreuger, and is currently on appeal. The former stockholders of CRI have agreed to pay any and all amounts of the judgement in excess of $83,000; provided, however, that the Company can only collect such amounts from the former stockholders by offsetting amounts owed by CRI and/or the Company to such stockholders pursuant to (i) the new lease of the new London, Kentucky facility (discussed in "Business Item 2. Description of Properties") and (ii) bonus arrangements described in certain employment agreements between the Company and the Kings. At December 31, 1997, CRI had $83,000 accrued in connection with the lawsuit. The maximum exposure for the claim is $107,000 and management has assessed recoverability of the $24,000 excess and deemed it to be recoverable. In February 1998, CRI paid $50,213 as settlement of the Court of Appeals affirming the award of $31,950 plus interest of $18,263. There is still pending one remaining claim, and the Company is vigorously defending the claim. On or about August 7, 1997, a class action lawsuit was filed against the Company and certain of the Company's officers and directors. Underwriters for the Company's initial public offering are also named as defendants. The class action plaintiffs are Lincoln Adair, Antique Prints, Ltd., and Martha Seamons, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated. The case is pending in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. In addition to seeking themselves declared proper plaintiffs and having the case certified as a class action, the plaintiffs are seeking unspecified monetary damages. The plaintiffs' complaint alleges claims under the federal securities laws for alleged misrepresentations and omissions in connection with purchases of securities. The Company disputes the allegations made in the complaint and intends to vigorously defend itself. Because the outcome of such litigation is not presently determinable, the effect on the Company's consolidated financial statements is not known. Therefore, no provision for any liability has been made in the accompanying financial statements. ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS. No matter was submitted to a vote of the security holders, through the solicitation of proxies or otherwise, during the fourth quarter of 1997. 9 PART II ITEM 5. MARKET FOR COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS. The Company's Common Stock and Warrants have traded on the Nasdaq SmallCap Market under the symbols "BRTL" and "BRTLW," respectively. The following table sets forth the high and low closing sale prices for the Company's Common Stock and Warrants for the periods indicated as reported by the Nasdaq National Market System. PERIOD FROM NOVEMBER 13, 1996 TO DECEMBER 31, 1996 HIGH LOW Common Stock $11 - 3/4 $ 9 - 13/16 Warrants 6 5 YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1997 HIGH LOW 1ST QUARTER Common Stock $13 $11 - 5/32 Warrants 7 - 3/8 5 - 1/4 2ND QUARTER Common Stock 11 - 7/8 3 - 1/16 Warrants 6 - 5/8 0 - 5/8 3RD QUARTER Common Stock 3 - 13/16 2 - 3/4 Warrants 0 - 7/8 0 - 1/4 4TH QUARTER Common Stock 5 - 7/8 3 Warrants 2 0 - 1/2 As of April 1, 1998, the approximate number of record holders of the Company's Common Stock and Warrants was 696 and 239, respectively. The Company believes that a significant number of beneficial owners hold substantial shares of Common Stock and Warrants in depository or nominee form. The Company has not paid dividends on its preferred stock or common stock to date. The Company is obligated to pay, quarterly, cumulative dividends at a rate of six percent (6%) per annum of the issue price of the Series A Convertible Preferred Stock, payable, at the holders' option, in cash or in common stock at the conversion price of the Series A Preferred Stock. So long as any shares of Series A Preferred Stock remain outstanding, the Company may not, without the vote or written consent of the holders of at least 66-2/3% of the then outstanding shares of Series A Preferred Stock, voting together as a single class, declare or pay any dividend with regard to any share of common stock. (SEE ADDITIONAL FACTORS THAT MAY AFFECT FUTURE RESULTS, ANTI-TAKEOVER EFFECT OF CERTAIN CHARTER AND BYLAW PROVISIONS). Additionally, although the current line of credit does not expressly prohibit the Company from paying dividends, the line of credit does contain certain covenants which restrict the reduction or depletion of the Company's capital. The Company anticipates that future financing, including any lines of credit, may further restrict or prohibit the Company's ability to pay dividends. Under the terms of the underwriting agreement entered into by the Company in connection with its initial public offering, the Company is restricted until November 20, 1998, from paying dividends in excess of the amount of the Company's current or retained earnings derived from November 20, 1996, unless the consent of the underwriters is obtained. The underwriting agreement has been terminated by the underwriter. USE OF PROCEEDS On November 20, 1996, the Company successfully completed an initial public offering of its common stock and warrants. The Company sold 1,437,500 shares of Common Stock and 718,750 Class A Redeemable Common Stock Purchase Warrants. The Company raised net proceeds, after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions and the expenses of the offering, of $7,046,000. The Company used $850,000 of the net proceeds to repay $817,500 in subordinated notes payable and related accrued interest on November 22, 1996; $350,000 to repay the outstanding balance under CRI's line of credit on March 25, 1997; $4,218,000 for the acquisitions of ARS, MicroData, Smyth, EBM and PCR, including approximately $200,000 for acquisition-related costs; and approximately $1,628,000 for working capital and general corporate purposes. 10 ITEM 6. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS. The following discussion of the financial condition and results of operations of the Company should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and related notes thereto included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB. This Annual Report on Form 10-KSB contains forward-looking statements which involve risks and uncertainties. The Company's actual results may differ significantly from the results discussed in the forward-looking statements. Factors that might cause such a difference include, but are not limited to, those discussed under "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations-Additional Factors That May Affect Future Results." YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1997 AND THE PERIOD FROM INCEPTION (APRIL 3, 1996) TO DECEMBER 31, 1996 REVENUE The Company's total revenue is comprised of two components: (i) revenue derived from the sale and installation of hardware and software (Systems Revenue) and (ii) revenue derived from the sale of services and supplies (Service Revenue). Total revenue for the year ended December 31, 1997, was $21,088,000 and was comprised of revenue from the Company's wholly-owned subsidiaries CRI and ARS for the entire year and MicroData, Smyth, EBM and PCR from the date of their respective acquisitions (see NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, NOTE 3. ACQUISITIONS). This represents an increase of 403% from the Company's total revenue of $4,196,000 for the period from inception (April 3, 1996) to December 31, 1996. Total revenue for the period from inception (April 3, 1996) to December 31, 1996, is comprised solely of revenue of CRI subsequent to the Company's acquisition of CRI on June 28, 1996. The increase in revenue from the period from inception (April 3, 1996) to December 31, 1996 to the year ended December 31, 1997, is due primarily to the revenue contributed by the additional acquired businesses. Total revenue for the year ended December 31, 1997 was comprised of 64% Systems Revenue and 36% Service Revenue, as compared to a revenue composition of 74% Systems Revenue and 26% Service Revenue for the period from inception (April 3, 1996) to December 31, 1996. The mix of revenue changed from 1996 to 1997 due to the following: (i) an increase in Service Revenue in 1997 derived from additional maintenance contracts obtained as a result of a high volume of systems sold by CRI during the last half of 1996 and (ii) different revenue mixes at ARS and at the subsidiaries acquired in 1997. No customer accounted for more than 10% of total revenue for the year ended December 31, 1997. Sales to Seed Restaurant Group accounted for approximately 33% of total revenue for the period from inception (April 3, 1996) to December 31, 1996. Sales of products from the Company's three main hardware vendors, Panasonic, ERC, and NCR, accounted for approximately 32% of total revenue for the year ended December 31, 1997, and approximately 51% of total revenue for the period from inception (April 3, 1996) to December 31, 1996. The Company has supply agreements with these manufacturers. The agreements are non-exclusive, have geographic limitations and may have renewable one-year terms depending upon the Company's achievement of a previously-agreed-to procurement quota. Geographical limitations are the assignment of sales territories that define the municipalities and states where the Company subsidiaries can sell a manufacturer's hardware or software. The actual sales territories for each manufacturer is subsidiary specific and some subsidiaries may not have permission to sell hardware or software of certain manufacturers in certain regions or territories of the country. A change in the Company's relationships with these principal vendors could have a material adverse effect on the Company's business, results of operations, financial condition and cash flows. GROSS MARGIN Gross margin for the year ended December 31, 1997 was 30% and was comprised of gross margin for Systems Revenue of 34% and gross margin for Service Revenue of 23%. Gross margin for the period from inception (April 3, 1996) to December 31, 1996, was 32% and was comprised of gross margin for Systems Revenue of 31% and gross margin for Service Revenue of 36%. The decrease in gross margin between these years is primarily due to lower margins realized on Service Revenue as a direct result of a provision of $451,182 in the fourth quarter of 1997 on slow-moving replacement parts and higher service costs at acquired companies in 1997, offset by an improved product mix in Systems Revenue. The provision of $451,182 is related to the acquisition of EBM on June 6, 1997, and the later consolidation of inventories into the Company's wholly-owned subsidiary, CRI. After such consolidation and because of the lower than planned level of sales, the Company determined that it had excess replacement parts inventory as of December 31, 1997 and took the appropriate writedown. Gross margin for the period from inception (April 3, 1996) to December 31, 1996, is comprised solely of gross margin of CRI subsequent to the acquisition of CRI on June 28, 1996. 11 SELLING, GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES Selling, general and administrative expenses for the year ended December 31, 1997, totaled $8,956,000, or 42% of net revenue, and totaled $1,452,000 for the period from inception (April 3, 1996) to December 31, 1996, or 35% of net revenue. The increase in selling, general and administrative expenses as a percentage of net revenue for the year ended December 31, 1997, is primarily due to a full year of staffing, operating and acquisition costs incurred at corporate headquarters needed to successfully integrate acquired companies and to support future growth. GOODWILL WRITE-DOWN The Company reviews its assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. During the fourth quarter of 1997, the Company determined that certain amounts recorded for goodwill from prior acquisitions were impaired and no longer recoverable. Such determination was made on an analysis of each subsidiary's projected revenues, profits and undiscounted cash flows at the date of acquisition compared to actual and projected revenues, profit and loss and undiscounted cash flows as of December 31, 1997. For the purposes of this analysis, each subsidiary was identified as a separate asset group as each subsidiary is independent. From this analysis, an estimate was made as to the amount of goodwill, which would be recoverable from future operations and compared to the recorded amounts of goodwill at December 31, 1997; a write-down was recorded for the difference. The total goodwill write-down recorded separately in the accompanying statement of operations was approximately $1,871,000 which consisted of $1,442,000 related to Smyth Systems, $419,000 related to CRI and $10,000 related to other subsidiaries. The goodwill write-downs are primarily due to fourth quarter decisions by the Company based on operating losses and lack of sales growth at both Smyth and CRI. Prior to the time of the acquisition, Smyth Systems had begun a marketing effort to penetrate the apparel and sporting goods markets. These markets were expected to grow rapidly and represented the major reason that the Company paid a purchase price in excess of book value for Smyth which was allocated to goodwill at the acquisition date. However, by mid-fourth quarter of 1997, it was apparent that Smyth was not able to penetrate these markets due to a lack of sales caused by an insufficient product line and that the costs to successfully sell into these markets were not reasonable given Smyth's operating losses. As a result, in the fourth quarter, a decision was made to discontinue the sales, marketing and promotional activities to penetrate these markets and a goodwill impairment charge was recorded. At the date of CRI's acquisition of EBM, it was anticipated that sales from EBM would continue to expand and that EBM would move towards profitability as it expected an increase in sales volume to the fast-food and table-service restaurant market because of the ability to offer a certain product to a wider geographical area. However, the product did not sell as anticipated due to quality problems and by the fourth quarter of 1997, several key people associated with the marketing of this product had left the Company. This resulted in larger losses than anticipated and led to the impairment of the goodwill. After such write-downs, the Company believes that the remaining goodwill amounts recorded for each subsidiary are recoverable over the remaining amortization period. RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT COSTS Research and development costs were $554,000 for the year ended December 31, 1997, and consist primarily of costs related to internally-developed, software to run on the latest operating systems, designed for the golf course and resort market incurred at the Company's wholly-owned subsidiary Smyth, which was acquired on May 29, 1997. The Company's policy is to expense such costs until technological feasibility is established. At December 31, 1997, such technological feasibility had not been established. A previous version of the software that ran on an older operating system is currently being licensed on a non-exclusive basis. INTEREST INCOME AND INTEREST EXPENSE The Company earned interest income of $131,000 for the year ended December 31, 1997, compared to $43,000 for the period from inception (April 3, 1996) to December 31, 1996. Interest income in 1997 was derived primarily from interest earned on the investment of the Company's proceeds from its initial public offering in November 1996. The proceeds were invested in a short-term, interest-bearing money market fund. The Company recognized interest expense of $111,000 for the year ended December 31, 1997, compared to $46,000 for the period from inception (April 3, 1996) to December 31, 1996. Interest expense in 1997 consisted primarily of interest on outstanding balances on the Company's lines of credit. Interest expense in 1996 consisted primarily of interest on $817,500 of subordinated notes payable that were issued on June 30, 1996. 12 INCOME TAX PROVISION The Company recorded an effective income tax provision of 0% for the year ended December 31, 1997, and for the period from inception (April 3, 1996) to December 31, 1996. Income tax expense in 1997 consisted solely of state taxes as the Company had a taxable loss for federal income tax purposes. LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES FOR THE COMPANY The Company had cash and cash equivalents of $716,000 and working capital of $264,000 at December 31, 1997, compared to cash and cash equivalents of $5,476,000 and working capital of $6,164,000 at December 31, 1996. In the year ended December 31, 1997, the Company used $1,942,000 of cash in operations; used $208,000 for the purchase of property and equipment and used $3,008,000 for the acquisitions of MicroData, Smyth, EBM and PCR; and generated $1,247,000 from financing activities, which consists of the net impact of borrowings and repayments under the Company's various debt agreements and the purchase of treasury stock. In addition, the Company used $1,100,000 during the year ended December 31, 1997, for an acquisition which was later rescinded, where $250,000 was refunded to the Company in cash. The remaining funds are recorded as $600,000 in receivables and $250,000 in other assets at December 31, 1997, and will be returned to the Company as provided in the Rescission Agreement (see NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, NOTE 3, ACQUISITIONS). During the period from inception (April 3, 1996) to December 31, 1996, the Company used $44,000 of cash in operations; used $86,000 for the purchase of property and equipment and used $2,035,000 for the acquisitions of CRI and ARS; and generated $7,640,000 from investing activities, primarily due to proceeds received from the Company's initial public offering. The provision of $451,000 for slow moving replacement parts was mainly due to the acquisition of EBM and subsequent incorporation of operations into the Company's wholly-owned subsidiary, CRI. After such consolidation and because of the lower than planned level of sales, the company determined that it had excess replacement parts inventory as of December 31, 1997 and took the appropriate write-down. On December 17, 1997, the Company obtained a new line of credit which provides for aggregate borrowings up to $5,000,000 computed based on eligible accounts receivable and inventories; bears interest at the bank's prime rate plus 1.75%; matures on December 31, 2000; and is collateralized by the Company's accounts receivable and inventories. Pursuant to the terms of the line of credit, the Company is subject to covenants which, among other things, impose certain financial reporting obligations on the Company and prohibit the Company from engaging in certain transactions prior to obtaining the written consent of the lender. Some of the significant transactions include: (i) acquire or sell any assets over $50,000 excluding purchases of dealers; (ii) sell or transfer any collateral except for finished inventory in the ordinary course of business; (iii) sell inventory on a sale-or-return, guaranteed sale, consignment or other contingent basis; (iv) incur any debts, outside the ordinary course of business, which would have a material adverse effect; (v) guarantee or otherwise become liable with respect to obligations of another party or entity; (vi) pay or declare any cash dividends; or (vii) make any change in the Company's capital structure that would have a material adverse effect. The Company repaid all amounts outstanding under its previous CRI, ARS and Smyth credit lines using proceeds from the new line of credit. The Company had outstanding borrowings of $2,031,000 bearing interest at 10.25% at December 31, 1997. On November 20, 1996, the Company successfully completed an initial public offering of its common stock and warrants. The Company sold 1,437,500 shares of Common Stock and 718,750 Class A Redeemable Common Stock Purchase Warrants. The Company raised net proceeds, after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions and the expenses of the offering, of $7,046,000. The Company used $850,000 of the net proceeds to repay $817,500 in subordinated notes payable and related accrued interest on November 22, 1996; $350,000 to repay the outstanding balance under CRI's line of credit on March 25, 1997; $4,218,000 for the acquisitions of ARS, MicroData, Smyth, EBM and PCR, including approximately $200,000 for acquisition-related costs; and approximately $1,628,000 for working capital and general corporate purposes. The Company is currently engaged in discussions with several other retail automation solution businesses regarding possible acquisitions, some of which could be material. However, the Company currently has not entered into any definitive agreements with respect to any acquisitions that are, individually or in the aggregate, material to the Company. The Company's exposure to litigation claims is discussed in Commitments and Contingencies, Note 8 to the consolidated financial statements. On or about August 7, 1997, a class action complaint was filed against the Company and certain of the Company's officers and directors. Underwriters for the Company's initial public offering are also named as defendants. The class action plaintiffs are Lincoln Adair, Antique Prints, Ltd., and Martha Seamons, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated. The case is pending in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. In addition to seeking themselves declared proper plaintiffs and having the case certified as a class action, plaintiffs seek unspecified monetary damages. The plaintiffs complaint alleges claims under the federal securities laws for alleged misrepresentations and omissions in connection with purchases of securities. The Company disputes the allegations made in the complaint and is vigorously defending itself. Because the outcome of such litigation is not presently determinable, the effect on the Company's consolidated financial statements is not known. Therefore, no provision for any liability has been made in the accompanying financial statements. 13 On March 18, 1998, the Company entered into a definitive agreement for a private placement of shares of Series A Preferred Stock. The investment commitment is up to $2,000,000 and will be issued in three installments. The first installment of $1,000,000 funded on March 18, 1998. The second and third installments of $500,000 each will subsequently close in thirty and sixty days, respectively, assuming that the various conditions set forth in the purchase agreement are met. The Series A Preferred Stock is convertible by the holders into common stock of the Company at any time into a number of shares of common stock determined by dividing the issue price by the conversion price, which is defined to be 78% of the lowest five-day average closing bid price for the 25-day period prior to the date of the conversion notice. At no time shall the conversion price be higher than 110% of the five-day average bid price prior to the date such shares were purchased. The dividends on the Series A Preferred Stock is payable quarterly in stock or in cash. The purchaser of the Series A Preferred Stock received warrants to purchase 125,000 shares for the first $1,000,000 installment. The agreement has a provision that prohibits the purchaser from owning more than 20% of the Company's common stock. In addition, if one of the two remaining installments might cause the purchaser to own more than 20% of the Company's outstanding common stock, then the installment will not fund. The Company has employment agreements with certain executive officers and employees, the terms of which expire at various times through 2004 and provide for minimum salary levels. In addition, certain officers of the acquired companies receive a portion of the acquired company's pre-tax profits greater than the amount defined in the officer's employment agreement. At December 31, 1997, no provision for bonus payments were made for these certain employment agreements due to the fact that the Companies incurred pre-tax losses. The aggregate commitment for future salaries and the guaranteed bonus amounts was $7,106,878 at December 31, 1997 excluding bonuses contingent on achieving certain pre-tax profits. The Company believes payment of these contingent bonuses will not have a material adverse effect on results of operations, financial condition or cash flows. In addition, the Company has entered into an employment contract with an employee, expiring in 2008, that provides for a minimum salary and certain guaranteed bonus amounts that are payable even in the event of termination for cause or upon death. The aggregate commitment for future salaries and guaranteed bonus amounts under this contract at December 31, 1997 was $443,275. The employee is not an executive officer of the Company. The Company has an independent contractor agreement with a former owner of a subsidiary, expiring in 2003. The commitment for future payments under this contract at December 31, 1997 was $650,000. The Company anticipates that its current cash on hand, cash flow from operations and additional financing available under its credit facility will be sufficient to meet the Company's liquidity requirements for its operations through the end of 1998. However, the Company intends to identify, evaluate and acquire additional retail automation solution businesses during 1998. These acquisitions are expected to be funded through a combination of cash and common stock and may necessitate additional costs and expenditures to expand operational and financial systems and corporate management and administration. The Company will require additional financing in order to continue this acquisition program. The Company currently intends to obtain financing through future issuances of debt or equity securities during 1998. However, there can be no assurance that the Company will be able to successfully obtain financing or that such financing will be available on terms the Company deems acceptable. The Company's long-term success is dependent upon its ability to obtain necessary financing, the successful execution of management's strategic plan and the achievement of sustained profitable operations. 14 SEASONALITY, QUARTERLY INFORMATION AND INFLATION The Company's business is subject to seasonal influences. The POS dealers and system integrators which the Company has acquired to date have typically had lower net revenues in the quarters ending March 31 and December 31 primarily due to the lower level of new store openings by customers caused by inclement weather, budgetary concerns and/or holidays. The Company believes that this pattern of seasonality will continue in the foreseeable future. Quarterly results in the future may be materially affected by the timing and magnitude of acquisitions and costs related to such acquisitions, the timing and extent of staffing additions at corporate headquarters necessary to integrate acquired companies and support future growth and general economic conditions. Therefore, results for any quarter are not necessarily indicative of the results that the Company may achieve for any subsequent quarter or for a full year. The effect of inflation on the Company's operations has not been significant to date. However, there can be no assurance that a high rate of inflation in the future would not have an adverse effect on the Company's future operating results. ADDITIONAL FACTORS THAT MAY AFFECT FUTURE RESULTS This Annual Report on Form 10-KSB/A contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, that are based on current expectations and involve a number of risks and uncertainties. In addition, the Company may from time to time make oral forward-looking statements. Factors that may materially affect revenues, expenses and operating results include, without limitation, the success of the Company's operating subsidiaries; the impact of the Company's acquisition strategy and the Company's ability to successfully integrate and manage the acquired subsidiaries; the ability of the Company to obtain future financing on acceptable terms; and subsequent changes in business strategy or plan. The forward-looking statements included herein are based on current assumptions that the Company will continue to sell and install products on a timely basis; that the Company will continue to sell maintenance contracts to service its installed base; that the Company will successfully implement its acquisition strategy; that competitive conditions within the Company's market will not change materially or adversely; that demand for the Company's products and services will remain strong; that the Company will retain existing key management personnel; that inventory risks due to shifts in market demand will be minimized; that the Company's forecasts will accurately anticipate market demand; that the Company will be able to obtain future financing on acceptable terms when needed; that the Company will be able to maintain key vendor relationships; and that there will be no material adverse change in the Company's operations or business. Assumptions relating to the foregoing involve judgments that are difficult to predict accurately and are subject to many factors that can materially affect the Company's business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. Budgeting and other management decisions are subjective in many respects and are, thus, susceptible to interpretations and periodic revisions based on actual experience and business developments, the impact of which may cause the Company to alter its acquisition strategy, marketing, capital expenditure, or other budgets, which may in turn affect the Company's business, results of operations, financial condition and cash flows. In light of the factors that can materially affect the forward-looking information included herein, the inclusion of such information should not be regarded as a representation by the Company or any other person that the objectives or plans of the Company will be achieved. Because of these and other factors affecting the Company's operating results, past financial performance should not be considered an indicator of future performance, and investors should not use historical trends to anticipate results or trends in future periods. In addition to the factors discussed above in this section, as well as those discussed under the heading "Seasonality, Quarterly Information and Inflation," the following factors also may materially affect the Company's business, results of operations, financial condition and cash flows and therefore should be considered. 15 LIMITED OPERATING HISTORY. The Company was founded in April 1996 and, prior to the acquisition of CRI in June 1996, the Company had no operations upon which an evaluation of the Company and its prospects could be based. There can be no assurance that the Company will be able to implement successfully its strategic plan, to generate sufficient revenue to meet its expenses or to achieve or sustain profitability. See "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations." RISKS RELATED TO THE COMPANY'S ACQUISITION STRATEGY. The Company's strategy is to increase its revenue and the markets it serves through the acquisition of additional POS dealers and value added resellers serving retail end users. From its inception through March 31, 1998, the Company has completed six acquisitions. There can be no assurance that the Company will be able to identify, acquire or profitably manage additional companies or successfully integrate the operations of additional companies into those of the Company without encountering substantial costs, delays or other problems. In addition, there can be no assurance that companies acquired in the future will achieve sales and profitability that justify the Company's investment in them or that acquired companies will not have unknown liabilities that could materially adversely affect the Company's results of operations or financial condition. The Company may compete for acquisition and expansion opportunities with companies that have greater resources than the Company. There can be no assurance that suitable acquisition candidates will continue to be available, that financing for acquisitions will be obtainable on terms acceptable to the Company, that acquisitions can be consummated or that acquired businesses can be integrated successfully and profitably into the Company's operations. Further, the Company's results of operations in quarters immediately following a material acquisition may be materially adversely effected while the Company integrates the acquired business into its existing operations. The Company may acquire certain businesses that have either been unprofitable or that have had inconsistent profitability prior to their acquisition. An inability of the Company to improve the profitability of these acquired businesses could have a material adverse effect on the Company. Finally, the Company's acquisition strategy places significant demands on the Company's resources and there can be no assurance that the Company's management and operational systems and structure can be expanded to effectively support the Company's continued acquisition strategy. If the Company is unable to implement successfully its acquisition strategy, this inability may have a material adverse effect on the Company's business, results of operations, financial condition and cash flows. In connection with six of its acquisitions, the Company entered into employment agreements with certain individuals. Under the terms of such agreements, if certain performance standards of the acquired companies are met, the Company is obligated to pay a bonus to these individuals. The performance standards are based upon among other things, the acquired companies' pre-tax profits. As of this date, none of the acquired companies have met the performance standards, and accordingly, the Company has not made any bonus payments under any of such employment agreements. The employment agreements also allow the Company to take certain remedial action in the event the acquired companies do not meet their respective performance standards. With respect to five of the acquisitions, the Company has taken remedial action against certain employees who did not meet (or whose company did not meet) the performance standards set out in their respective employment agreements. Such remedial action includes the georgraphic transfer of one employee, the placement of other employees on probation, and the restructing of two of the acquisitions. NEED FOR ADDITIONAL FINANCING TO IMPLEMENT ACQUISITION STRATEGY. The Company currently intends to effect future acquisitions with cash generated from operations and future issuances of debt or equity securities. There can be no assurance that the Company will be able to obtain financing if and when it is needed on terms the Company deems acceptable. The inability of the Company to obtain financing would have a material adverse effect on the Company's ability to implement its acquisition strategy, and as a result, could require the Company to diminish or suspend its acquisition strategy. CONSIDERATION FOR ACQUIRED COMPANIES EXCEEDS ASSET VALUE. Valuations of the companies acquired by the Company have not been undertaken based on independent appraisals, but have been determined through arm's-length negotiations between the Company and representatives of such companies. The consideration for each such company has been based primarily on the judgment of management as to the value of such company as a going concern and not on the book value of the acquired assets. Valuations of these companies determined solely by appraisals of the acquired assets may have been less than the consideration paid for the companies. No assurance can be given that the future performance of such companies will be commensurate with the consideration paid. Specifically, during the fourth quarter fo 1997, the Company recorded a goodwill write-down for approximately $1,871,000. See "Goodwill Write-down in Management Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Opertations." No assurance can be given that the facts and circumstances surrounding the write-down will not occur in the future. Moreover, the Company has incurred and expects to incur significant amortization charges resulting from consideration paid in excess of the book value of the assets of the companies acquired and companies which may be acquired in the future. 16 SUBSTANTIAL COMPETITION. The POS industry is highly fragmented and competitive. Competitive factors within the industry include product prices, quality of products, service levels, and reputation and geographical location of dealers. The Company primarily competes with independent POS dealers and some of these dealers may have greater financial resources available to them than does the Company. In addition, there are original equipment manufacturers of POS equipment that compete in certain product areas. The Company's ability to make acquisitions will also be subject to competition. The Company believes that, during the next few years, POS dealers may seek growth through consolidation with entities other than the Company. In addition, no assurance can be given that the major manufacturers will not choose to effect or expand the distribution of their products through their own wholesale organizations or effect distribution directly to many of the retail accounts of the Company in the markets served by the Company. Any of these developments could have a material adverse effect on the Company's business, results of operations, financial condition and cash flows. SUBSTANTIAL FLUCTUATIONS IN FUTURE OPERATING RESULTS. The Company may experience substantial fluctuations in its annual and quarterly operating results in future periods. The Company's operating results are affected by a number of factors, many of which are beyond the Company's control. A substantial portion of the Company's backlog is typically scheduled for delivery within 90 days. Delivery dates for products sold by the Company are subject to change due to customers changing the required installation date of an automation retail solution system. The changing of such delivery dates is beyond the Company's control. Quarterly sales and operating results therefore depend in large part on customer-driven delivery dates, which are subject to change. In addition, a significant portion of the Company's operating expenses are relatively fixed in nature and planned expenditures are based in part on anticipated orders. Any inability to adjust spending quickly enough to compensate for any revenue shortfall may magnify the adverse impact of such revenue shortfall on the Company's results of operations. DEPENDENCE ON MANUFACTURERS. A substantial portion of the Company's total revenue is and will be derived from the sale of POS systems, ECRs and related equipment, none of which are manufactured by the Company. The Company's business is dependent upon close relationships with manufacturers of POS equipment and the Company's ability to purchase equipment in the quantities necessary and upon competitive terms so that it will be able to meet the needs of its end user customers. For the year ended December 31, 1997, the Company purchased its hardware principally from three main vendors, Panasonic, ERC, a distributor of Panasonic products, and NCR. Sales of Panasonic, ERC and NCR products accounted for approximately 32% of net revenue for the year ended December 31, 1997. There can be no assurance that the relationships with these manufacturers will continue or that the Company's supply requirements can be met in the future. The Company's inability to obtain equipment, parts or supplies on competitive terms from its major manufacturers could have a material adverse effect on the Company's business, results of operations, financial condition and cash flows. FIXED FEE CONTRACTS. Many of the Company's service contracts are fixed fee contracts pursuant to which the customer pays a specified fee for the Company's performance of all necessary maintenance and remedial services during the contract's term. Under these agreements, the Company is responsible for all costs incurred in maintaining and repairing the equipment, including the cost of replacement parts, regardless of actual costs incurred. Accordingly, the Company can incur losses from fixed fee contracts if the actual cost of maintaining or repairing the equipment exceeds the costs estimated by the Company. POTENTIAL INABILITY TO MARKET NEWLY DEVELOPED PRODUCTS. The technology of POS systems, ECRs, VARs and related equipment is changing rapidly. There can be no assurance that the Company's existing manufacturers will be able to supply competitive new products or achieve technological advances necessary to remain competitive in the industry. Further, there can be no assurance that the Company will be able to obtain the necessary authorizations from manufacturers to market any newly developed equipment. The Company's Smyth subsidiary operates in the VAR solutions segment, wherein it develops customized turnkey retail automation solutions, consisting of both hardware and software. There can be no assurance that Smyth will be able to develop commercially viable and technologically competitive VAR solutions at competitive prices. 17 RELIANCE ON KEY PERSONNEL. Implementation of the Company's acquisition strategy is largely dependent on the efforts of a few senior officers. In particular, the Company's operations are dependent to a great degree on the continued efforts of Chief Executive Officer Richard H. Walker. Furthermore, the Company will in most probability continue to be dependent on the senior management of companies that are acquired. Competition for highly qualified personnel is intense, and the loss of any executive officer or other key employee, or the failure to attract and retain other skilled employees, could have a material adverse effect upon the Company's business, results of operations or financial condition. The Company is a party to employment agreements with Mr. Walker, as well as with Executive Vice President Paul Spindler. The agreements with Messrs. Walker and Spindler terminate in the years 2004 and 2001, respectively, unless terminated earlier pursuant to the agreements, and each contains confidentiality provisions and covenants not to compete. State laws, however, may limit the enforceability of the confidentiality and/or non-competition provisions therein. The Company is currently the beneficiary of a key man life insurance policy in the amount of $1,000,000 on the life of Mr. Walker for a term of three years. There can be no assurance that the Company will maintain the policy in effect or that the coverage will be sufficient to compensate the Company for the loss of the services of Mr. Walker. ANTI-TAKEOVER EFFECTS OF CERTAIN CHARTER AND BYLAW PROVISIONS. Certain provisions of the Company's Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws may have the effect of making it more difficult for a third party to acquire, or of discouraging a third party from attempting to acquire, control of the Company. These provisions make it more difficult for stockholders to take certain corporate actions and could have the effect of delaying or preventing a change in control of the Company. For example, the Company has not elected to be excluded from the provisions of Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law, which impose certain limitations on business combinations with interested stockholders upon acquiring 15% or more of the common stock. This statute may have the effect of inhibiting a non-negotiated merger or other business combination involving the Company, even if such event would be beneficial to the then-existing stockholders. In addition, the Company's Certificate of Incorporation authorizes the issuance of up to 4,000,000 shares of preferred stock with such rights and preferences as may be determined from time to time by the Board of Directors. Accordingly, the Board of Directors may, without stockholder approval, issue preferred stock with dividends, liquidation, conversion, and voting or other rights, which could adversely affect the voting power or other rights of the holders of the Company's common stock. The issuance of preferred stock could have the effect of entrenching the Company's Board of Directors and making it more difficult for a third party to acquire a majority of the outstanding voting stock of the Company. As of March 31, 1998, the Company had issued 10,000 shares of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock, at an issue price of $100 per share. Each share of Series A Preferred Stock is convertible at the option of the holder thereof at any time into a number of shares of common stock determined by dividing the issue price by the conversion price, which is defined to be 78% of the lowest non-consecutive five-day average closing bid price for the common stock for the 25-day period prior to conversion. Each holder of shares of the Series A Preferred Stock is entitled to the number of votes equal to the number of shares of common stock into which it could be converted. The Company cannot, without the vote or written consent of at least 66-2/3% of the then outstanding shares of Series A Preferred Stock, (i) redeem, purchase or otherwise acquire for value any share of the Series A Preferred Stock; (ii) redeem, purchase or otherwise acquire any of the Company's common stock; (iii) authorize or issue any other equity security senior to or on parity with the Series A Preferred Stock as to voting rights, dividend rights, conversion rights, redemption rights or liquidation preferences; (iv) declare or pay any dividend or make any distribution with regard to any share of common stock; (v) sell, convey, lease or otherwise dispose of all or substantially all of its property or business; liquidate, dissolve or wind up the Company's business; or merge into or consolidate with any other corporation (other than a wholly-owned subsidiary); (vi) effect any transaction or series of transactions in which more than 50% of the voting power of the Company is disposed of, unless the Company's stockholders of record as constituted immediately prior to such transaction will, immediately thereafter, hold at least a majority of the voting power of the surviving or acquiring entity; (vii) permit any subsidiary to issue or sell any of its capital stock (except to the Company); (viii) increase or decrease (other than by redemption or conversion) the total number of authorized shares of Series A Preferred Stock; or (ix) alter or change the rights, preferences or privileges of the shares of Series A Preferred Stock so as to adversely affect the shares. VOLATILITY OF STOCK PRICE. The stock market from time to time experiences significant price and volume fluctuations that are unrelated to the operating performance of the particular companies. These broad market fluctuations may materially adversely affect the market price of the Company's common stock. In addition, the market price of the Company's common stock has been and may continue to be highly volatile. Factors such as possible fluctuations in the Company's business, results of operations or financial condition, failure of the Company to meet expectations of security analysts and investors, announcements of new acquisitions, the timing and size of acquisitions, the loss of suppliers or customers, the announcement of new or terminated supply agreements by the Company or its competitors, changes in regulations governing the Company's operations or its suppliers, the loss of the services of a member of senior management, litigation and changes in general market conditions all could have a material adverse affect on the market price of the Company's common stock. MAINTENANCE CRITERIA FOR NASDAQ; RISKS OF LOW-PRICED SECURITIES. The Company's common stock is presently traded on the Nasdaq SmallCap Market. To maintain inclusion on the Nasdaq SmallCap Market, the Company's common stock must continue to be registered under Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act, and the Company must continue to have at least $2,000,000 in net tangible assets or $500,000 in income in two of the last three years, a public float of at least 500,000 shares, $1,000,000 in market value of public float, a minimum bid price of $1.00 per share, at least two market makers and at least 300 stockholders. While the Company currently meets the maintenance standards, there is no assurance that the Company will be able to maintain the standards for Nasdaq SmallCap Market inclusion with respect to its securities. At December 31, 1997, the Company had $2,032,000 in net tangible assets. If the Company fails to maintain Nasdaq SmallCap Market listing, the market value of the Company's common stock likely would decline and stockholders would find it more difficult to dispose of or to obtain accurate quotations as to the market value of the common stock. INDEMNIFICATION AND LIMITATION OF LIABILITY. The Company's Certificate of Incorporation (the "Certificate') and Bylaws include provisions that eliminate the directors' personal liability for monetary damages to the fullest extent possible under Delaware Law or other applicable law (the "Director Liability Provision"). The Director Liability Provision eliminates the liability of directors to the Company and its stockholders for monetary damages arising out of any violation by a director of his fiduciary duty of due care. Under Delaware Law, however, the Director Liability Provision does not eliminate the personal liability of a director for (i) breach of the director's duty of loyalty, (ii) acts or omissions not in good faith or involving intentional misconduct or knowing violation of law, (iii) payment of dividends or repurchases or redemptions of stock other than from lawfully available funds, or (iv) any transaction from which the director derived an improper benefit. The Director Liability Provision also does not affect a director's liability under the federal securities laws or the recovery of damages by third parties. ABSENCE OF DIVIDENDS. The Company has not paid dividends on its preferred stock or common stock to date. The Company is obligated to pay quarterly, cumulative dividends at a rate of six percent (6%) per annum of the issue price of the Series A Convertible Preferred Stock, payable, at the 18 holders' option, in cash or in common stock at the conversion price of the Series A Preferred Stock. So long as any of shares Series A Preferred Stock remain outstanding, the Company may not, without the vote or written consent of the holders of at least 66-2/3% of the then outstanding shares of Series A Preferred Stock, voting together as a single class, declare or pay any dividend with regard to any share of common stock. (See ADDITIONAL FACTORS THAT MAY AFFECT FUTURE RESULTS, ANTI-TAKEOVER EFFECT OF CERTAIN CHARTER AND BYLAW PROVISIONS). Additionally, although the current line of credit does not expressly prohibit the Company from paying stock dividends, the line of credit does contain certain covenants which restrict the reduction or depletion of the Company's capital. The Company anticipates that future financing, including any lines of credit, may further restrict or prohibit the Company's ability to pay dividends. Under the terms of the underwriting agreement entered into by the Company in connection with its initial public offering, the Company is restricted until November 20, 1998, from paying dividends in excess of the amount of the Company's current or retained earnings derived from November 20, 1996, unless the consent of the underwriters is obtained. The underwriting agreement has been terminated by the underwriter. YEAR 2000 COMPLIANCE. Many currently installed computer systems and software products are coded to accept only two digit entries in the date code field. These date code fields will need to accept four digit entries to distinguish 21st century dates from 20th century dates. As a result, in less than two years, computer systems and software used by many companies may need to be upgraded to comply with such "Year 2000" requirements. The Company's Smyth subsidiary is currently upgrading its software for golf course applications to a version that runs on the latest operating systems. The Company currently estimates it will expend approximately $150,000 to $200,000 in 1998 to make such software, Year 2000 compliant. Although the Company believes that such software will be Year 2000 compliant, there can be no assurances that compliance will be achieved. In the event such compliance is not achieved, it may have a material adverse effect on the Company's business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. In addition, the Company believes that the purchasing patterns of customers and potential customers may be affected by Year 2000 issues as companies expend significant resources to correct their current software systems for Year 2000 compliance. These expenditures may result in reduced funds available to purchase software products such as those offered by the Company. The Company is making inquiries of its vendors of POS systems and cash registers regarding whether the systems upon which they rely are Year 2000 compliant and whether they anticipate any impairment of their ability to deliver product and services as a result of Year 2000 issues. If the Company determines a particular vendor will be impacted by this problem, the Company may attempt to identify additional or replacement vendors, which could delay accessibility of the products and/or services provided by such vendors. Such a delay or failure to identify an additional or replacement vendor could have a material adverse effect on the Company's business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. RESTRICTIONS ON COMPANY'S ABILITY TO ENTER INTO CERTAIN TRANSACTIONS. On December 17, 1997, the Company obtained a new line of credit. Pursuant to the terms of the line of credit, the Company is prohibited from engaging in certain transactions without first obtaining the written consent of the lender. Such transactions include, but are not limited to, (i) the sale or acquisition of assets with a value exceeding $50,000; (ii) the sale of transfer of any collateral under the line of credit, except for the sale of items in the Company's finished inventory in the ordinary course of business; (iii) the sale of inventory on a sale-or-return, guaranteed sale, consignment or other contingent basis; and (iv) any other transaction outside the ordinary course of business. No assurance can be given that these restrictions will not impact the Company's ability to conduct business in the future, even though the line of credit does not prohibit or restrict the Company from acquiring other companies (including acquisitions for amounts greater than $50,000) pursuant to its acquisition strategy. ITEM 7. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS. The financial statements required to be filed hereunder are included under Item 13(a)(1) of this report. ITEM 8. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE. On September 30, 1997, the Board of Directors of the Company approved the dismissal of its former principal accountants, Ernst & Young LLP, and appointed the accounting firm of Deloitte & Touche LLP as its new independent auditors. During the period from inception (April 3, 1996) to December 31, 1996, and each subsequent interim period preceding September 30, 1997, there were no disagreements with Ernst & Young LLP on any matter of accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure, or auditing scope or procedure, which disagreements, if not resolved to the satisfaction of Ernst & Young LLP, would have caused it to make reference to the subject matter of the disagreements in connection with its report. The Ernst & Young LLP report on the financial statements of the Company for the period from inception (April 3, 1996) to December 31, 1996, contained no adverse opinion or disclaimer of opinion, nor was either qualified or modified as to uncertainty, audit scope, or accounting principles. 19 PART III ITEM 9. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS, PROMOTERS AND CONTROL PERSONS; COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 16(A) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT. The information set forth in the 1998 Proxy Statement under the captions "Election of Directors" and "Other Executive Officers" respectively, is incorporated herein by reference. ITEM 10. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION. To the extent required, the information in the 1998 Proxy Statement under the captions "Compensation of Directors" and "Executive Compensation" and "Employment Contracts and Termination of Employment, and Change-in-Control Arrangements" is incorporated herein by reference. Herewith, "Employment Contracts and Termination of Employment, Change-in-Control Arrangements" has been amended to reflect additional disclosure and is incorporated with the amended 10 KSB/A. EMPLOYMENT CONTRACTS AND TERMINATION OF EMPLOYMENT, CHANGE-IN-CONTROL ARRANGEMENTS The Company has entered into employment agreements with its Chief Executive Officer, Richard H. Walker, and its Executive Vice President, Paul Spindler. Mr. Walker's employment agreement provides for a salary of $225,000 per year. Mr. Spindler's employment agreement provides for a salary of $150,000 per year. Both employment agreements are subject to upward adjustments during the terms of the agreements. On April 3, 1997, the salaries of Mr. Walker and Mr. Spindler increased to $247,500 and $165,000 per year, respectively. Mr. Walker and Mr. Spindler, according to their contract, are entitled to an annual, salary increase of not less than ten percent every April 3rd with the Board of Directors' approval. As of this amended filing, no such increase had been approved. Mr. Spindler's employment agreement terminates on December 31, 2001. On February 28, 1998, the Company's Board of Directors approved a resolution to extend the term of Mr. Walker's employment agreement for an additional three year period until December 31, 2004, unless terminated earlier in accordance with the agreement. Each employment agreement contains confidentiality provisions and covenants not to compete. In addition, each employment agreement has clauses providing for payment of the amount of unpaid salary that would have been due through the expiration of the term of the agreement in the event that the agreement is terminated due to death or disability. In the event of termination of either agreement for reasons other than death and disability, salary shall be paid through the date of termination. The other reasons include voluntary resignation or termination for cause. There is no severance or change-in-control provisions in the agreements. ITEM 11. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT. The information set forth in the 1998 Proxy Statement under the caption "Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management" is incorporated herein by reference. ITEM 12. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS. The information set forth in the 1998 Proxy Statement under the caption "Certain Relationships and Related Transactions" is incorporated herein by reference. 20 ITEM 13. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K. (a) Financial Statements The financial statements listed on the index to financial statements on page 25 are filed as part of this Form 10-KSB/A. (b) Exhibits Exhibits marked with an asterisk (*) are filed herewith. The remainder of the exhibits have heretofore been filed with the Commission and are incorporated herein by reference. Each management contract or compensation plan or arrangement filed as an exhibit hereto is identified by a (+). EXHIBIT NUMBER DESCRIPTION ------- ----------- 2.1 Agreement and Plan of Merger by and among the Company, Bristol Merger Corporation, Automated Register Systems, Inc. and the Shareholders thereof (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 of the Company's Form 8-K dated December 31, 1996, filed on January 15, 1997, File No. 000-21633). 2.2 Agreement and Plan of Reorganization by and among the Company, Smyth Systems Inc., the Managing Stockholders of Smyth Systems, Inc. and Smyth Merger Corp. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.29 of the Company's Form 8-K dated May 29, 1997 filed on June 12, 1997, File No. 0-21633). 2.3 Second Amendment to Agreement and Plan of Reorganization by and among the Company, Smyth Systems Inc., the Managing Stockholders of Smyth Systems, Inc. and Smyth Merger Corp. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.30 of the Company's Form 8-K dated May 29,1997, filed on June 12, 1997, No. 0-21633). 2.4 Agreement and Plan of Merger, as amended, by and among the Company, Cash Register, Inc., Floyd Shirrell and Electronic Business Machines, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.35 of the Company's Form 8-K dated June 6, 1997, filed on June 20, 1997, File No. 0-21633). 2.5 Agreement and Plan of Merger by and among Bristol Retail Solutions, Inc., Pacific Merger Corp., Pacific Cash Register and Company, Inc., Robert Freaney and Abbass Barzgar dated June 27, 1997, (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.41 of the Company's Form 10-Q dated June 30, 1997, filed on August 13, 1997, File No. 0-21633). 2.6 Closing Agreement by and among the Company, Pacific Merger Corp., Pacific Cash Register and Company, Inc., Robert Freaney and Abbass Barzgar dated August 4, 1997, (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.43 of the Company's Form 10-Q dated June 30, 1997, filed on August 13, 1997, File No. 0-21633). 2.7 Rescission Agreement by and among the Company, International Systems & Electronics Corporation and Pedro Penton dated July 23, 1997, (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.42 of the Company's Form 10-Q dated June 30, 1997, filed on August 13, 1997, File No. 0-21633). 3.1 Certificate of Incorporation, as amended, of the Company (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of Amendment No. 1 to the Company's Registration Statement on Form SB-2, File No. 333-5570-LA). 3.2 Bylaws of the Company (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 of Amendment No. 1 to the Company's Registration Statement on Form SB-2, File No. 333-5570-LA). 21 EXHIBIT NUMBER DESCRIPTION ------- ----------- 4.1 Form of Common Stock Certificate (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of Amendment No. 1 to the Company's Registration Statement on Form SB-2, File No. 333-5570-LA). 4.2 Form of Class A Redeemable Common Stock Purchase Warrants (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 of Amendment No. 1 to the Company's Registration Statement on Form SB-2, File No. 333-5570-LA). 4.3 Form of Registration Rights Agreement by and among the Company and Investors listed on Schedule 1 thereto (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4 of the Company's Registration Statement on Form SB-2, File No. 333-5570-LA). 4.4 Form of Underwriter's Warrant Agreement for Shares entered into between the Company and First Cambridge Securities Corporation (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.5 of Amendment No. 1 of the Company's Registration Statement on Form SB-2, File No. 333-5570-LA). 4.5 Form of Underwriter's Warrant Agreement for Warrants entered into between the Company and First Cambridge Securities Corporation (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.6 of Amendment No. 1 of the Company's Registration Statement on Form SB-2, File No. 333-5570-LA). 4.6 Form of Warrant Agreement entered into between the Company and American Stock Transfer and Trust Company (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.7 of Amendment No. 1 to the Company's Registration Statement on Form SB-2, File No. 333-5570-LA). 10.1 Form of the 1996 Equity Participation Plan of the Company, dated July 31, 1996, (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company's Registration Statement on Form SB-2, File No. 333-5570-LA). 10.2 Amendment to the 1996 Equity Participation Plan of the Company (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit A of the Company's Definitive Proxy Statement filed on April 14,1997, File No. 0-21633). 10.3 1997 Employee Stock Purchase Plan of the Company (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit B of the Company's Definitive Proxy Statement filed on April 14, 1997, File No. 0-21633). 10.4+ Employment Agreement between the Company and Richard H. Walker dated April 3, 1996, (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 of the Company's Registration Statement on Form SB-2, File No. 333-5570-LA). 10.5+ Employment Agreement between the Company and Paul Spindler dated April 3, 1996, (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 of the Company's Registration Statement on Form SB-2, File No. 333-5570-LA). 10.6+ Employment Agreement between the Company and Maurice R. Johnson dated June 28, 1996, (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 of the Company's Registration Statement on Form SB-2, File No. 333-5570-LA). 10.7+ Employment Agreement between Michael Pollastro and Automated Register Systems, Inc., dated January 1, 1997, (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.27 of the Company's 8-K/A dated December 31, 1996, filed on March 14, 1997, File No. 0-21633). 22 EXHIBIT NUMBER DESCRIPTION ------- ----------- 10.8+ Employment Agreement between Gary Pollastro and Automated Register Systems, Inc., dated January 1, 1997, (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.28 of the Company's 8-K/A dated December 31, 1996, filed on March 14, 1997, File No. 0-21633). 10.9+ Employment Agreement between John Pollastro and Automated Register Systems, Inc., dated January 1, 1997, (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.29 of the Company's Form 8-K/A dated December 31, 1996, filed on March 14, 1997, File No. 0-21633). 10.10+ Employment Agreement by and between Robert T. Smyth and Smyth Systems, Inc., and first Amendment to Employment Agreement dated June 1, 1997, (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.31 of the Company's Form 8-K dated May 29, 1997, filed on June 12,1997, File No. 0-21633). 10.11+ Employment Agreement by and between Larry D. Smyth and Smyth Systems, Inc., and first Amendment to Employment Agreement dated June 1, 1997, (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.32 of the Company's Form 8-K dated May 29, 1997, filed on June 12,1997, File No. 0-21633). 10.12+ Employment Agreement by and between William A. Smyth and Smyth Systems, Inc., and first Amendment to Employment Agreement dated June 1, 1997, (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.33 of the Company's Form 8-K dated May 29, 1997, filed on June 12,1997, File No. 0-21633). 10.13+ Independent Contractor Agreement by and between the Company, Cash Registers, Inc. and Floyd Shirrell, (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.36 of the Company's 8-K dated June 6, 1997, filed on June 20, 1997, File No. 0-21633). 10.14 Lease Agreement between Paul Thompson, Cash Registers, Incorporated, and Coye D. King dated October 30, 1987, (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.10 of the Company's Registration Statement on Form SB-2, File No. 333-5570-LA). 10.15 Stock Purchase Agreement by and among the Company, Cash Registers, Inc., and Maurice R. Johnson, Andrew D. King and C. Stephen King, dated as of June 26, 1996, (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.14 of the Company's Registration Statement on Form SB-2, File No. 333-5570-LA). 10.16 Building Lease dated May 29, 1990, by and between Automated Register Systems, Inc., Michael J. Pollastro, Gary T. Pollastro, and John and Carmen Pollastro, as amended by First Amendment to Building Lease dated January 1, 1997, by and between Automated Retail Systems, Inc., Michael Pollastro, Gary T. Pollastro, and John and Carmen Pollastro, (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.25 of the Company's Form 8-K dated December 31, 1996, filed on January 15, 1997, File No. 000-21633). 10.17 Loan and Security Agreement by and between the Company, Cash Registers, Inc., Smyth Systems, Inc., Automated Retail Systems, Inc., and Coast Business Credit dated December 11, 1997. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.17 of the Company's Form 10-KSB dated December 31, 1997, filed on April 15, 1998, File No. 000-21633). 10.18 First Amendment to the Loan and Security Agreement by and between the Company, Cash Registers, Inc., Smyth Systems, Inc., Automated Retail Systems, Inc., and Coast Business Credit dated January 6, 1998. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.18 of the Company's Form 10-KSB dated December 31, 1997, filed on April 15, 1998, File No. 000-21633). 10.19 Second Amendment to the Loan and Security Agreement by and between the Company, Cash Registers, Inc., Smyth Systems, Inc., Automated Retail Systems, Inc., and Coast Business Credit dated February 2, 1998. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.19 of the Company's Form 10-KSB dated December 31, 1997, filed on April 15, 1998, File No. 000-21633). 23 EXHIBIT NUMBER DESCRIPTION ------- ----------- 11* Statement of Computation of Per Share Earnings. 21* List of Subsidiaries of the Company. 23.1* Consent of Ernst & Young LLP. 23.2* Consent of Deloitte & Touche LLP. 23.3* Consent of Deloitte & Touch LLP. 27* Financial Data Schedule. (c) Reports on Form 8-K During the last quarter of the year covered by this report, the Company filed the following Current Reports on Form 8-K: i. On October 6, 1997, the Company filed a report on Form 8-K reporting, under Item 4 thereof, that it had changed its principal accountants from Ernst & Young LLP to Deloitte & Touche LLP. The change was effective September 30, 1997. 24 SIGNATURES In accordance with Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Exchange Act, the registrant caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized. Bristol Retail Solutions, Inc. (Registrant) By /S/ Richard H. Walker -------------------------------------- Richard H. Walker President, Chief Executive Officer and Director Date: August 13, 1998 In accordance with the Exchange Act, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
SIGNATURE TITLE DATE --------- ----- ---- /S/ Richard H. Walker Chief Executive Officer, President and August 13, 1998 - ------------------------------------------ Director Richard H. Walker (Principal Executive Officer) /S/ Paul Spindler Executive Vice President, Chairman of August 13, 1998 - ------------------------------------------ the Board and Director Paul Spindler /S/ Michael S. Shimada Chief Financial Officer August 13, 1998 - ------------------------------------------ (Principal Accounting and Financial Michael S. Shimada Officer) /S/ Lawrence Cohen Director August 13, 1998 - ------------------------------------------ Lawrence Cohen /S/ Dr. Jack Borsting Director August 13, 1998 - ------------------------------------------ Dr. Jack Borsting /S/ Peter Stranger Director August 13, 1998 - ------------------------------------------ Peter Stranger
25 INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS BRISTOL RETAIL SOLUTIONS, INC. PAGE ---- Report of Independent Auditors - Ernst & Young LLP.......................... 27 Independent Auditors' Report - Deloitte & Touche LLP........................ 28 Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 1997 and December 31, 1996........................... 29 Consolidated Statements of Operations for the year ended December 31, 1997 and for the period from inception (April 3, 1996) to December 31, 1996.......... 30 Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity for the year ended December 31, 1997 and for the period from inception (April 3, 1996) to December 31, 1996 . 31 Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the year ended December 31, 1997 and for the period from inception (April 3, 1996) to December 31, 1996...... 32 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.................................. 34 26 REPORT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS Board of Directors Bristol Retail Solutions, Inc. We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of Bristol Retail Solutions, Inc. (the Company) as of December 31, 1996 and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity and cash flows for the period from inception (April 3, 1996) to December 31, 1996. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. We conducted our audit in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Bristol Retail Solutions, Inc. at December 31, 1996 and the consolidated results of its operations and its cash flows for the period from inception (April 3, 1996) to December 31, 1996 in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles. ERNST & YOUNG LLP Orange County, California March 27, 1997 27 INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT The Board of Directors and Stockholders of Bristol Retail Solutions, Inc. We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of Bristol Retail Solutions, Inc. and subsidiaries (the Company) as of December 31, 1997 and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity and cash flows for the year ended December 31, 1997. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit. We conducted our audit in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. In our opinion, such consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Bristol Retail Solutions, Inc. and subsidiaries at December 31, 1997 and the results of their operations and cash flows for the year ended December 31, 1997 in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles. DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP Costa Mesa, California March 27, 1998 28 BRISTOL RETAIL SOLUTIONS, INC. CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
DECEMBER 31, DECEMBER 31, 1997 1996 ------------ ------------ ASSETS Current assets: Cash and cash equivalents $ 715,929 $ 5,475,674 Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $382,990 and $39,090 at December 31, 1997 and 1996 3,202,787 1,296,956 Inventories 3,314,029 2,169,531 Prepaid expenses and other current assets 422,860 88,628 Current portion of note receivable 144,380 -- Amounts due from related parties -- 67,028 ------------ ------------ Total current assets 7,799,985 9,097,817 Property and equipment, net 759,725 250,826 Intangible assets, net of accumulated amortization of $265,801 and $18,589 at December 31, 1997 and 1996 4,160,964 1,693,400 Note receivable - noncurrent portion 293,839 -- Other assets 797,117 127,656 ------------ ------------ Total assets $13,811,630 $11,169,699 ============ ============ LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY Current liabilities: Short-term borrowings $ 2,060,141 $ 438,441 Accounts payable 1,893,589 964,625 Accounts payable to related party 133,701 -- Accrued salaries, wages and related benefits 775,628 210,567 Accrued expenses 540,703 230,889 Deferred revenue 1,596,296 427,059 Customer advances 399,758 425,717 Income taxes payable 63,229 179,000 Note payable to related party -- 40,000 Current portion of long-term debt 54,110 -- Current portion of capital lease obligations 19,264 17,029 ------------ ------------ Total current liabilities 7,536,419 2,933,327 Capital lease obligation - noncurrent portion 14,827 36,879 Other long-term liabilities 66,998 24,500 Commitments and contingencies (note 8) Stockholders' equity: Preferred stock, $.001 par value: 4,000,000 shares authorized and no shares issued or outstanding -- -- Common stock, $.001 par value: 20,000,000 shares authorized; 5,548,510 and 5,543,510 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 1997; 4,745,654 shares issued and outstanding at 5,548 4,746 December 31, 1996 Additional paid-in-capital 11,287,695 8,276,872 Accumulated deficit (5,075,232) (106,625) ------------ ------------ 6,218,011 8,174,993 Less 5,000 shares of treasury stock, at cost (24,625) -- ------------ ------------ Total stockholders' equity 6,193,386 8,174,993 ------------ ------------ Total liabilities and stockholders' equity $13,811,630 $11,169,699 ============ ============
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements. 29 BRISTOL RETAIL SOLUTIONS, INC. CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
Inception Year Ended (April 3, 1996) to December 31, 1997 December 31, 1996 ------------------ ------------------ Revenue: System sales and installation $ 13,501,805 $ 3,120,350 Service and supplies sales 7,586,682 1,075,880 -------------- -------------- Net revenue 21,088,487 4,196,230 Cost of revenue: Cost of system sales and installation 8,862,489 2,161,340 Cost of service and supplies sales 5,830,955 684,655 -------------- -------------- Total cost of revenue 14,693,444 2,845,995 -------------- -------------- Gross margin 6,395,043 1,350,235 Operating expenses: Selling, general and administrative expenses 8,955,793 1,452,215 Goodwill writedown 1,871,471 -- Research and development costs 554,076 -- -------------- -------------- Total operating expenses 11,381,340 1,452,215 -------------- -------------- Operating loss (4,986,297) (101,980) Other (income) expense (20,190) 2,845 -------------- -------------- Loss before income taxes (4,966,107) (104,825) Provision for income tax 2,500 1,800 -------------- -------------- Net loss $ (4,968,607) $ (106,625) ============== ============== Basic and diluted net loss per share $ (0.96) $ (0.03) ============== ============== Basic and diluted weighted average common shares outstanding 5,198,156 3,319,738 ============== ==============
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements. 30 BRISTOL RETAIL SOLUTIONS, INC. CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
COMMON STOCK ADDITIONAL ACCUMULATED TREASURY STOCK SHARES AMOUNTS PAID-IN-CAPITAL DEFICIT SHARES AMOUNTS TOTAL ---------- ---------- --------------- ----------- ---------- ---------- ------------ Balance at April 3, 1996 -- $ -- $ -- $ -- -- $ -- $ -- Issuance of shares to founders 2,648,745 2,649 17,351 -- -- -- 20,000 Issuance of shares in private placement, net of issuance costs of $35,252 577,417 577 509,171 -- -- -- 509,748 Issuance of shares to directors 23,838 24 22,476 -- -- -- 22,500 Issuance of shares in initial public offering, net of issuance costs of $1,660,026 1,437,500 1,438 6,963,536 -- -- -- 6,964,974 Issuance of warrants in initial public offering, net of issuance costs of $8,984 -- -- 80,859 -- -- -- 80,859 Issuance of warrants to underwriter -- -- 188 -- -- -- 188 Issuance of shares in connection with acquisition of ARS 58,154 58 683,291 -- -- -- 683,349 Net loss -- -- -- (106,625) -- -- (106,625) ---------- ---------- --------------- ----------- ---------- ---------- ------------ Balance at December 31, 1996 4,745,654 4,746 8,276,872 (106,625) -- -- 8,174,993 Compensation expense -- -- 8,021 -- -- -- 8,021 Issuance of shares in connection with acquisitions 802,856 802 3,002,802 -- -- -- 3,003,604 Purchase of treasury shares -- -- -- -- (5,000) (24,625) (24,625) Net loss -- -- -- (4,968,607) -- -- (4,968,607) ---------- ---------- --------------- ----------- ---------- ---------- ------------ Balance at December 31, 1997 5,548,510 $ 5,548 $ 11,287,695 $(5,075,232) (5,000) $ (24,625) $ 6,193,386 ========== ========== =============== =========== ========== ========== ============
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements. 31 BRISTOL RETAIL SOLUTIONS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS INCEPTION YEAR ENDED (APRIL 3, 1996) DECEMBER 31, TO DECEMBER 31, 1997 1996 -------------- -------------- Cash flows from operating activities Net loss $ (4,968,607) $ (106,625) Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash and cash equivalents used in operating activities: Depreciation 207,613 29,552 Amortization 415,854 18,589 Provision for doubtful accounts 231,984 13,000 Provision for excess and obsolete inventories 494,863 30,000 Stock compensation expense 8,021 -- Goodwill write-down 1,871,471 -- Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of effect of acquisitions: Accounts receivable (289,471) (111,184) Inventories (240,234) (413,664) Prepaid expenses and other assets (123,099) (17,641) Accounts payable (9,956) 124,760 Other accrued expenses 313,284 139,337 Deferred revenue 152,196 37,240 Customer advances (38,659) 188,597 Other long-term liabilities 32,969 24,500 -------------- -------------- Net cash used in operating activities (1,941,771) (43,539) Cash flows from investing activities Cash paid for acquisitions, net of cash acquired (3,007,701) (2,035,463) Cash paid for rescinded acquisition ( 1,100,000) -- Cash received from rescinded acquisition 250,000 -- Purchases of property and equipment (207,606) (85,646) -------------- -------------- Net cash used in investing activities (4,065,307) (2,121,109) Cash flows from financing activities Repayment of capital lease obligations (27,817) (7,540) Repayment of note payable to related party (47,922) -- Net borrowings on line of credit 1,371,700 49,593 Repayment of long-term debt (24,003) -- Issuance of subordinated notes payable -- 817,500 Repayment of subordinated notes payable -- (817,500) Issuance (repurchase) of common stock, net of offering costs (24,625) 7,517,222 Issuance of warrants, net of offering costs -- 81,047 -------------- -------------- Net cash provided by financing activities 1,247,333 7,640,322 -------------- -------------- Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents (4,759,745) 5,475,674 Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period 5,475,674 -- -------------- -------------- Cash and cash equivalents at end of period $ 715,929 $ 5,475,674 ============== ============== Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information: Cash paid for interest $ 111,082 $ 46,125 ============== ============== Cash paid for income taxes, net $ 40,410 $ 4,000 ============== ============== Supplemental disclosure of noncash transactions Capital lease obligations $ -- $ 54,884 ============== ============== Inventory received in payment of rescinded acquisition receivable $ 68,509 $ -- ============== ==============
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements. 32 BRISTOL RETAIL SOLUTIONS, INC. CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information (continued): The Company issued common stock and cash in connection with certain business combinations completed during the year ended December 31, 1997 and the period from inception (April 3, 1996) to December 31, 1996. The fair values of the assets acquired and the liabilities assumed at the dates of the respective acquisitions are presented as follows:
Inception Year Ended (April 3, 1996) to December 31, 1997 December 31, 1996 ------------------ ------------------ Current assets, net of cash acquired $ 3,534,044 $ 3,133,560 Property and equipment 895,255 139,848 Long-term assets 270,032 116,750 Intangible assets 4,581,016 1,712,379 Current liabilities (2,888,479) (2,376,771) Long-term debt, net of current portion (380,563) (6,954) ================== ================== Net assets acquired $ 6,011,305 $ 2,718,812 ================== ================== The acquisitions were funded as follows: Cash $ 3,007,701 $ 2,035,463 Common stock 3,003,604 683,349 ================== ================== $ 6,011,305 $ 2,718,812 ================== ==================
Effective June 1, 1997, the Company transferred certain land, buildings and building improvements acquired as part of the EBM acquisition, with a fair value of $381,000, and certain loans aggregating $381,000, assumed as part of the EBM acquisition, to the former owner of EBM. See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements. 33 BRISTOL RETAIL SOLUTIONS, INC. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 1. NATURE OF OPERATIONS AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES NATURE OF OPERATIONS Bristol Retail Solutions, Inc. (the Company, formerly Bristol Technology Systems, Inc.) was incorporated on April 3, 1996 in the State of Delaware for the purpose of acquiring and operating a national network of full-service retail automation solution providers. As of December 31, 1997, the Company has acquired six subsidiaries. The Company earns revenue from the sale and installation of point-of-sale (POS) systems and turnkey retail automation (VAR) systems, the sale of supplies and from service fees charged to customers under service agreements. Sales and service operations are located in various states throughout the western and midwestern United States. BASIS OF PRESENTATION The accompanying consolidated December 31, 1997 financial statements include the accounts of Bristol Retail Solutions, Inc. (the Company) and its wholly-owned subsidiaries: Cash Registers, Inc. (CRI), which includes (MicroData, Inc. (MicroData) and Electronic Business Machines, Inc. (EBM); Automated Register Systems, Inc. (ARS); Smyth Systems, Inc. (Smyth); and Pacific Cash Register and Computer, Inc., (PCR) (collectively, Acquisitions) from the date of acquisition. The accompanying consolidated December 31, 1996 financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries CRI and ARS from the date of acquisition. All intercompany transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. The Company's acquisitions were accounted for in the Company's consolidated financial statements as purchases in accordance with Accounting Principles Board Opinion (APB) No. 16. The purchase prices were allocated to the underlying assets and liabilities based upon their respective fair values. The allocation of the purchase price included the assignment of approximately $6,298,000 to excess of cost over net assets acquired. The results of the Acquisitions are included in the Company's consolidated financial statements subsequent to the respective dates of acquisition. Accordingly, the financial statements for the period subsequent to the Acquisitions are not comparable to the financial statements for the periods prior to the Acquisitions (SEE NOTE 3, ACQUISITIONS). Subsequent to the filing of the Company's Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 1997, in conjunction with a Securities and Exchange Commission's review of the Company's registration statement on Form S-3 filed on April 17, 1998, the SEC recommended certain footnote and business disclosures be amended. The Company has complied with the request and has submitted Form 10-KSB/A, Amendment No. 2, to reflect the amended disclosures. Such amendments were not significant and did not change the Company's results of operations. CASH EQUIVALENTS Cash equivalents represent highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less. CUSTOMER ADVANCES Customer advances represent deposits made in advance of equipment installation and are applied against invoices when revenue is recorded. INVENTORIES Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market using the specific identification method for inventories with identifying serial numbers and the average cost method for all other inventories. PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT Property and equipment is stated at cost. Depreciation is computed principally by accelerated methods for income tax and financial reporting purposes over the estimated useful lives of the assets which range from three to ten years. Leasehold improvements are amortized over the shorter of their useful life or the remaining term of the lease using the straight-line basis. 34 INTANGIBLE ASSETS Intangible assets consist primarily of goodwill which represents the excess of cost over the fair value of net assets acquired and is amortized on a straight-line basis over estimated useful lives of 15 and 20 years. In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 121, Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to Be Disposed Of, long-lived assets and certain identifiable intangibles held and used by the Company are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. The Company considers historical performance and future estimated results in its evaluation of potential impairment and then compares the carrying amount of the asset to the estimated expected future cash flows. The Company measures the amount of the impairment by comparing the carrying amount of the asset to its fair value. During the fourth quarter of 1997, the Company recorded a $1,871,000 write-down of goodwill (SEE NOTE 2, GOODWILL WRITE-DOWN). PREPAID LICENSE FEES The Company has prepaid amounts to a related party for certain software license agreements. These amounts will be amortized as the licenses are sold. The Company had prepaid license fees of $102,750 as of December 31, 1997 and 1996 which are included in other assets. REVENUE RECOGNITION The Company recognizes revenue for systems revenue upon shipment and completed installation at which time there are no other significant vendor obligations. Hardware sales are recognized as revenue upon shipment as there are no other significant vendor obligations. Training and other services are recognized as revenue when the items are delivered. Revenue from maintenance contracts is recognized ratably over the term of the agreement. SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT COSTS As a systems integrator, the Company provides its customers with turnkey software solutions including proprietary software products exclusively for application to retail operations. Purchased software, which generally has alternative future uses, is included in other assets and amortized, using the straight-line method, over the estimated economic life of the software of three to five years. Unamortized purchased software costs at December 31, 1997 and related amortization expense for the year then ended were not material. The costs of internal development of proprietary software are expensed as research and development costs until technological feasibility is established, pursuant to generally accepted accounting principles. At December 31, 1997, the Company had capitalized $243,000 of internal software development costs which are included in other assets. Commencing upon initial product release, these costs will be amortized using the straight-line method over the estimated useful life. No software development costs were amortized during the year ended December 31, 1997. INCOME TAXES The Company uses the liability method of accounting for income taxes as set forth in SFAS No. 109, ACCOUNTING FOR INCOME TAXES. Under the liability method, deferred taxes are determined based on the difference between the financial statement and tax bases of assets and liabilities using the enacted tax rates in effect in the years in which the differences are expected to reverse. Deferred tax assets are recognized and measured based on the likelihood of realization of the related tax benefit in the future. A valuation allowance related to a deferred tax asset is recorded when it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax asset will not be realized. FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS The fair value of the Company's cash, accounts receivable and accounts payable approximated their carrying amounts due to the relatively short maturity of these items. The fair value of debt approximated its carrying amount at the balance sheet date based on rates currently available to the Company for debt with similar terms and remaining maturities. 35 USE OF ESTIMATES The preparation of the financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. Actual results could differ from those estimates. CREDIT RISK The Company sells its products on credit terms, performs ongoing credit evaluations of its customers and generally does not require collateral. STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION The Company has elected to follow APB No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, and related Interpretations in accounting for its employee stock options because, as discussed below, the alternative fair value accounting provided for under SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, requires use of option valuation models that were not developed for use in valuing employee stock options. No compensation expense is recognized under APB No. 25, because the exercise price of the Company's employee stock options equals or exceeds the market price of the underlying stock on the date of grant. To calculate the pro forma information required by SFAS No. 123, the Company uses the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. The Black-Scholes model was developed for use in estimating the fair value of traded options that have no vesting restrictions and are fully transferable. In addition, option valuation models require the input of highly subjective assumptions, including the expected stock price volatility. Because the Company's employee stock options have characteristics significantly different from those of traded options, and because changes in the subjective input assumptions can materially affect the fair value estimate, in management's opinion, the existing models do not necessarily provide a reliable single measure of the fair value of its employee stock options. BASIC AND FULLY DILUTED PER SHARE INFORMATION In February 1997, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued SFAS No. 128, Earnings per Share, which is effective for financial statements for interim and annual periods ending after December 15, 1997. SFAS No. 128 redefines earnings per share under generally accepted accounting principles. SFAS No. 128 requires the Company to report Basic EPS, as defined therein, which excludes all common share equivalents from the earnings per share computation, and Diluted EPS, as defined therein, which is calculated similar to the Company's primary earnings per share computation. All historical earnings per share information has been restated as required by SFAS No. 128. Basic net income (loss) per share is computed using the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the periods presented. Diluted net income (loss) per share is computed using the weighted average number of common and common equivalent shares outstanding during the periods presented assuming the exercise of the Company's stock options and warrants. Common equivalent shares have not been included where inclusion would be antidilutive. Basic and diluted loss per share is based on the weighted average number of common shares outstanding. Common stock equivalents, which consist of stock options to purchase 1,405,000 shares of common stock at prices ranging from $2.875 to $3.163 per share and warrants to purchase 906,250 shares of common stock at prices ranging from $6.00 to $8.70 per share, were not included in the computation of Diluted EPS because such inclusion would have been antidilutive for the year ended December 31, 1997. For the period from inception (April 3, 1996) to December 31, 1996, common stock equivalents, which consist of stock options to purchase 418,166 shares of common stock at prices ranging from $6.00 to $6.50 per share and warrants to purchase 906,250 shares of common stock at prices ranging from $6.00 to $8.70 per share, were not included in the computation of Diluted EPS because such inclusion would have been antidilutive. RECENTLY ISSUED ACCOUNTING STANDARDS In June 1997, the FASB issued SFAS No. 130, Reporting Comprehensive Income. This statement establishes standards for the reporting of comprehensive income and its components in a financial statement that is displayed with the same prominence as other financial statements. Comprehensive income, as defined, includes all changes in equity (net assets) during a period from non-owner sources. Examples of items to be included in comprehensive income that are excluded from net income include foreign currency translation adjustments and unrealized gain/loss on available-for-sale securities. The disclosures prescribed by SFAS No. 130 are effective for interim periods and years beginning after December 15, 1997. In June 1997, the FASB issued SFAS No. 131, Disclosures About Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information. This statement establishes standards for the way companies report information about operating segments in annual financial statements. It also establishes standards for related disclosure about products and services, geographic areas and major customers. The Company has not yet determined what its reporting segments are. The disclosures prescribed by SFAS No. 131 are effective for interim periods and years beginning after December 15, 1997. 36 The American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) recently adopted Statement of Position 97-2, Software Revenue Recognition ("SOP 97-2") that supersedes SOP 91-1 and becomes effective for years beginning after December 15, 1997. The Company does not believe that this pronouncement will have an adverse material effect on its financial condition, results of operations or cash flows. 2. GOODWILL WRITEDOWN The Company reviews its assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. During the fourth quarter of 1997, the Company determined that certain amounts recorded for goodwill from prior acquisitions were impaired and no longer recoverable. Such determination was made on an analysis of each subsidiary's projected revenues, profits and undiscounted cash flows at the date of acquisition compared to actual and projected revenues, profit and loss and undiscounted cash flows as of December 31, 1997. For the purposes of this analysis, each subsidiary was identified as a separate asset group as each subsidiary is independent. From this analysis, an estimate was made as to the amount of goodwill, which would be recoverable from future operations and compared to the recorded amounts of goodwill at December 31, 1997; and a write-down was recorded for the difference. The total goodwill write-down recorded separately in the accompanying statement of operations was approximately $1,871,000 which consisted of $1,442,000 related to Smyth Systems, $419,000 related to CRI and $10,000 related to other subsidiaries. The goodwill write-downs are primarily due to fourth quarter decisions by the Company based on operating losses and lack of sales growth at both Smyth and CRI. Prior to the time of the acquisition, Smyth Systems had begun a marketing effort to penetrate the apparel and sporting goods markets. These markets were expected to grow rapidly and represented the major reason that the Company paid a purchase price in excess of book value for Smyth which was allocated to goodwill at the acquisition date. However, by mid-fourth quarter of 1997, it was apparent that Smyth was not able to penetrate these markets due to a lack of sales caused by an insufficient product line and that the costs to successfully sell into these markets were not reasonable given Smyth's operating losses. As a result, in the fourth quarter, a decision was made to discontinue the sales, marketing and promotional activities to penetrate these markets and a goodwill impairment charge was recorded. At the date of CRI's acquisition of EBM, it was anticipated that sales from EBM would continue to expand and that EBM would move towards profitability as it expected an increase in sales volume to the fast-food and table-service restaurant market because of the ability to offer a certain product to a wider geographical area. However, the product did not sell as anticipated due to quality problems and by the fourth quarter of 1997, several key people associated with the marketing of this product had left the Company. This resulted in larger losses than anticipated and led to the impairment of the goodwill. After such write-downs, the Company believes that the remaining goodwill amounts recorded for each subsidiary are recoverable over the remaining amortization period. 3. ACQUISITIONS During 1997 and 1996, the Company acquired the entities described below, which were accounted for by the purchase method of accounting: On June 28, 1996, the Company acquired all of the outstanding common stock of CRI, a POS systems dealer in Kentucky and southern Ohio, for cash consideration of $955,000, including acquisition costs of $72,000. The excess of purchase price over the fair values of the net assets acquired was $557,000 and has been recorded as goodwill, which is being amortized on a straight-line basis over 15 years. On December 31, 1996, the Company, through its wholly-owned subsidiary, Bristol Merger Corporation, acquired all of the outstanding common stock of ARS, a POS systems dealer in Washington, for consideration of $1,103,000 in cash, including $78,000 of acquisition costs, and 58,154 shares of non-registered, restricted common stock of the Company valued at approximately $683,000 at the acquisition date. The excess of purchase price over the fair values of the net assets acquired was $1,155,000 and has been recorded as goodwill, which is being amortized on a straight-line basis over 15 years. On April 1, 1997, the Company, through its wholly-owned subsidiary CRI, acquired all of the outstanding common stock of MicroData, a POS dealer with operations in Illinois and Kentucky, for consideration of $98,000 in cash, including $19,000 of acquisition costs, and 11,415 shares of non-registered, restricted common stock of the Company, valued at approximately $136,000 at the acquisition date. The excess of purchase price over the fair values of the net assets acquired was $155,000 and has been recorded as goodwill, which is being amortized on a straight-line basis over 20 years. On May 29, 1997, the Company acquired Smyth for consideration of $2,369,000 in cash, including $20,000 of acquisition costs, and 569,408 shares of non-registered, restricted common stock of the Company, valued at approximately $2,064,000 at the acquisition date. Smyth operates through two divisions which provide VAR systems to customers throughout the United States and POS systems to customers in Southern California and Ohio. The excess of purchase price over the fair values of the net assets acquired was $3,328,000 and has been recorded as goodwill, which is being amortized on a straight-line basis over 20 years. 37 On June 6, 1997, the Company, through its wholly-owned subsidiary CRI, acquired EBM, a POS dealer with operations in Indiana and Kentucky, for consideration of $483,000 in cash, including $62,000 of acquisition costs, and 147,033 shares of non-registered, restricted common stock of the Company, valued at approximately $579,000 at the acquisition date. The excess of purchase price over the fair values of the net assets acquired was $838,000 and has been recorded as goodwill, which is being amortized on a straight-line basis over 20 years. On August 5, 1997, the Company acquired all of the outstanding common stock of PCR, a POS dealer with operations in Northern California, for consideration of $165,000 in cash, including $13,000 of acquisition costs, and 75,000 shares of non-registered, restricted common stock of the Company, valued at approximately $225,000 at the acquisition date. The excess of purchase price over the fair values of the net assets acquired was $260,000 and has been recorded as goodwill, which is being amortized on a straight-line basis over 20 years. The purchase prices have been allocated to the assets acquired and the liabilities assumed based upon the fair values at the dates of acquisition (SEE SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION). The following presents the unaudited pro forma consolidated results of operations of the Company for the year ended December 31, 1997 and for the period from inception (April 3, 1996) to December 31, 1996 as if the CRI, ARS, Smyth and EBM acquisitions had been consummated on April 3, 1996, and includes certain pro forma adjustments resulting from the acquisitions. Pro forma adjustments for the year ended December 31, 1997, consist solely of adjustments to reflect an increase in goodwill amortization expense related to the Smyth and EBM acquisitions. Pro forma adjustments for the period from inception (April 3, 1996) to December 31, 1996 consist of the following: (i) adjustment to reflect an increase in goodwill amortization expense related to the CRI, ARS, Smyth and EBM acquisitions; (ii) adjustment to reflect an increase in rent expense at ARS, as ARS's office facility lease was renegotiated and the monthly rental rate increased as part of the Company's acquisition of ARS; (iii) adjustment to reflect an increase in interest expense as if the Company's $817,500 subordinated notes payable had been issued on April 3, 1996 (the notes were issued June 1996 and retired in November 1996 using IPO proceeds); and (iv) adjustment to calculate the impact on income taxes of the pro forma adjustments. FROM INCEPTION YEAR (APRIL 3, ENDED 1996) TO DECEMBER 31, DECEMBER 31, 1997 PRO FORMA 1996 PRO FORMA AS ADJUSTED AS ADJUSTED -------------- -------------- Net revenue $ 26,882,849 $ 10,085,836 Net income (loss) (5,153,593) 23,900 Basic and diluted net income (loss) per share (0.94) 0.01 Shares used in computing basic and diluted net income (loss) per share 5,491,352 3,541,166 Options to purchase 418,166 shares of common stock at $6.00 per share were outstanding during the second half of 1996, but were not included in the computation of diluted EPS because the options' exercise price was greater than the average market price of common shares. The unaudited pro forma consolidated results of operations are presented for comparative purposes only and do not necessarily reflect the results that would have occurred had the acquisitions occurred on April 3, 1996 or the results which may occur in the future. On May 9, 1997, pursuant to a merger agreement dated April 30, 1997, the Company acquired all of the outstanding common stock of International Systems & Electronics Corporation (ISE), a POS dealer with operations in Florida, for consideration of $1,192,000 in cash, including $92,000 of acquisition costs, and 130,434 shares of non-registered, restricted common stock of the Company, valued at approximately $750,000. On July 23, 1997, the Company entered into a Rescission Agreement whereby the merger agreement and all of the transactions contemplated thereunder were rescinded in their entirety effective as of April 30, 1997. In accordance with the Rescission Agreement, (i) all of the 130,434 shares of common stock have been returned to the Company and canceled; (ii) the shareholder of ISE has refunded to the Company $250,000 in cash; (iii) the shareholder of ISE has delivered to the Company a promissory note in the amount of $350,000 bearing interest at 8.5% to be paid in thirty equal monthly installments commencing in January 1998; (iv) the shareholder of ISE will from time to time make monthly transfers of finished goods inventory to the Company, with an aggregate market value of up to $250,000; and (v) a consulting agreement has been executed by the shareholder of ISE to provide consulting services to the Company through December 31, 2001 for a fee of $250,000, which fee has been prepaid by the Company. In the accompanying balance sheet, the $350,000 promissory note is included in notes receivable; the $250,000 inventory 38 receivable is included in other current assets, net of inventory received as of December 31, 1997 of $68,509; and the $250,000 consulting agreement is included in other assets, net of accumulated amortization at December 31, 1997 of $36,000.No revenues or expenses of ISE have been included in the accompanying statement of operations and all costs incurred related to the acquisition and the subsequent rescission have been expensed by the Company. The shares of common stock issued for the acquisition of ISE have been returned and cancelled are not included in the weighted average common shares outstanding used to compute the Company's basic and diluted net loss per share. 4. CONCENTRATIONS OF CREDIT RISK The Company sells its products primarily to quick-service restaurants, grocery stores and other retailers. Credit is extended based on an evaluation of the customer's financial condition and collateral is generally not required. Credit losses have historically been minimal and such losses have been within management's expectations. For the year ended December 31, 1997, there was no customer that accounted for more than 10% of sales. For the period from inception (April 3, 1996) to December 31, 1996, 33% of revenues were attributable to one major quick-service food franchisor and its franchisees. The Company purchases its hardware primarily from three main vendors. Sales of products from these vendors accounted for 32% and 51% of net revenue for the year ended December 31, 1997 and for the period from inception (April 3, 1996) to December 31, 1996, respectively. 5. INVENTORIES Inventories consist primarily of POS terminals, peripherals, paper and other supplies for resale to customers, as well as items to support maintenance contracts. Inventories held by revenue type were as follows: DECEMBER 31, DECEMBER 31, 1997 1996 -------------- ------------- Systems and installation inventories $ 2,417,472 $ 1,469,404 Services and supplies inventories 896,557 700,127 -------------- ------------- $ 3,314,029 $ 2,169,531 ============== ============= Included in services and supplies inventories at December 31, 1997 and December 31, 1996 is approximately $431,479 and $365,255, respectively, of used or refurbished parts and components which the Company has on hand to fulfill maintenance contract requirements. Due to the nature of the systems installed and the longevity of the systems in general, service may be provided for several years after sale, causing much of the refurbished inventories on hand to be composed of older items. During the fourth quarter of 1997, the Company recorded a provision for excess and obsolete inventories of $451,182. 6. PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT Property and equipment consist of the following: DECEMBER 31, DECEMBER 31, 1997 1996 -------------- ------------- Furniture and equipment $ 673,251 $ 154,053 Automobiles 215,688 35,754 Leasehold improvements 107,685 90,571 -------------- ------------- 996,624 280,378 Less accumulated depreciation (236,899) (29,552) -------------- ------------- Property and equipment, net $ 759,725 $ 250,826 ============== ============= 39 7. SHORT-TERM BORROWINGS On December 17, 1997, the Company entered into a new line of credit that provides for aggregate borrowings up to $5,000,000 computed based on eligible accounts receivable and inventories; bears interest at the bank's prime rate plus 1.75%, (10.25% at December 31, 1997); matures on December 31, 2000; and is collateralized by the Company's accounts receivable and inventory. Pursuant to the terms of the line of credit, the Company is subject to covenants which, among other things, impose certain financial reporting obligations on the Company and prohibit the Company from engaging in certain transactions prior to obtaining the written consent of the lender. Some of the significant transactions include: (i) acquire or sell any assets over $50,000 excluding purchases of dealers; (ii) sell or transfer any collateral except for finished inventory in the ordinary course of business; (iii) sell inventory on a sale-or-return, guaranteed sale, consignment or other contingent basis; (iv) incur any debts, outside the ordinary course of business, which would have a material adverse effect; (v) guarantee or otherwise become liable with respect to obligations of another party or entity; (vi) pay or declare any cash dividends; or (vii) make any change in the Company's capital structure that would have a material adverse effect. The Company repaid all amounts outstanding under its previous CRI, ARS and Smyth credit lines using proceeds from the new line of credit. The Company had outstanding borrowings of $2,031,000 bearing interest at 10.25% at December 31, 1997. At December 31, 1997, the Company was in compliance with the covenants on the line of credit. 8. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES The Company leases certain facilities, equipment and vehicles under noncancelable capital leases and operating lease arrangements expiring in various years through 2003. Certain of the operating leases may be renewed for periods ranging from one to three years. Future annual minimum lease payments for noncancelable capital and operating leases at December 31, 1997 were: CAPITAL OPERATING LEASES LEASES ------------ ------------ 1998 $ 25,043 $ 790,519 1999 16,057 643,003 2000 -- 334,612 2001 -- 243,762 2002 -- 226,498 Thereafter -- 180,760 ------------ ------------ Total minimum lease payments 41,100 $ 2,419,154 Amounts representing interest (7,009) ============ ------------ Present value of minimum lease payments 34,091 Current portion (19,264) ------------ Long-term capital lease $ 14,827 ============ obligations Rent expense for the year ended December 31, 1997 was $581,438, of which $48,000 was paid to a director of CRI and $173,760 was paid to a officer of ARS. Rent expense for the period from inception (April 3, 1996) to December 31, 1996 was $123,441, of which $15,000 was paid to a director of CRI. The net book value of assets under capital lease at December 31, 1997 was $28,967. 40 In connection with its proposed move from its current location in London, Kentucky, CRI has agreed to negotiate in good faith a definitive lease regarding up to 12,000 square feet of office and warehouse space to be constructed by two officers and former owners of CRI. Certain terms of the lease have already been agreed to, and it is expected that when signed, the lease will be for 10 years and the rate will be $6.00, $8.00, and $10.00 dollars per square foot for years one, two, and three through ten, respectively. The Company has agreed to guarantee these lease payments. The Company expects that the remaining terms of the lease will be competitive and as favorable to the Company as those which could be obtained from unrelated third parties. Upon commencement of the lease of the new office complex, the monthly lease for CRI's current space in London, Kentucky, will be terminated without penalty. The Company believes that the terms of the contract are equivalent to or more favorable than those that would be obtained under an arm's-length transaction. In connection with the merger of ARS into the Company on December 31, 1996, an amended lease agreement was executed with the former owners of ARS, certain of whom are now officers of ARS, for the office facility which ARS currently occupies. The amended lease is at a monthly rate of $15,063 and expires in December 2003. The mortgage on this building is guaranteed by ARS. The mortgage balance outstanding at December 31, 1997 was $331,000. EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENTS The Company has employment agreements with certain executive officers and employees, the terms of which expire at various times through 2004 and provide for minimum salary levels. In addition, certain officers of the acquired companies receive a portion of the acquired company's pre-tax profits greater than the amount defined in the officer's employment agreement. At December 31, 1997, no provision for bonus payments were made for these certain employment agreements due to the fact that the companies incurred pre-tax losses. The aggregate commitment for future salaries and the guaranteed bonus amounts was $7,106,878 at December 31, 1997 excluding bonuses contingent on achieving certain per-tax profits. The Company believes payment of these contingent bonuses will not have a material adverse effect on results of operations, financial condition or cash flows. In addition, the Company has entered into an employment contract with an employee, expiring in 2008, that provides for a minimum salary and certain guaranteed bonus amounts that are payable even in the event of termination for cause or upon death. The aggregate commitment for future salaries and guaranteed bonus amounts under this contract at December 31, 1997 was $443,275. The Company has a independent contractor agreement, with a former owner of a subsidiary, expiring in 2003. The commitment for future payments under this contract at December 31, 1997 was $650,000. LITIGATION The Company's subsidiaries have been, from time to time, parties to various lawsuits and other matters involving ordinary and routine claims arising in the normal course of business. In the opinion of management of the Company and its counsel, although the outcomes of these claims and suits are not presently determinable, in the aggregate, they should not have a material adverse affect on the Company's business, financial position or results of operations or cash flows. At December 31, 1996, the Company had $83,000 accrued in connection with a lawsuit wherein CRI is being sued by a former employee. In accordance with the purchase agreement between the Company and the former owners of CRI, the Company's liability is limited to $83,000 in connection with this suit. Any amounts in excess of $83,000 are recoverable from amounts due to the former owners under certain lease and employment agreements. The maximum exposure for the claim is $107,000 and management has assessed the recoverability of the $24,000 excess and deemed it to be recoverable. In February 1998, CRI paid $50,213 as settlement of the Court of Appeals affirming the award of $31,950 plus interest of $18,263. There is still pending one remaining claim, and the Company is vigorously fighting the claim. On or about August 7, 1997, a class action complaint was filed against the Company and certain of the Company's officers and directors. Underwriters for the Company's initial public offering are also named as defendants. The class action plaintiffs are Lincoln Adair, Antique Prints, Ltd., and Martha Seamons, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated. The case is pending in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. In addition to seeking themselves declared proper plaintiffs and having the case certified as a class action, plaintiffs seek unspecified monetary damages. The plaintiffs' complaint alleges claims under the federal securities laws for alleged misrepresentations and omissions in connection with purchases of securities. The Company disputes the allegations made in the complaint and intends to vigorously defend itself. Because the outcome of such litigation is not presently determinable, the effect on the Company's consolidated financial statements is not known. 41 9. STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY WARRANTS At December 31, 1997, the Company had outstanding 718,750 Class A Redeemable Common Stock Purchase Warrants (Warrants) that entitle each holder to purchase one share of common stock for $6.00 during a five-year period commencing December 12, 1997. The exercise price and the number of shares issuable upon exercise of the Warrants are subject to adjustment in certain circumstances. Commencing February 12, 1998, the Warrants are redeemable by the Company at $.01 per Warrant upon thirty-days' prior written notice, provided the closing bid price of the common stock shall have been at least $10.00 per share for the twenty consecutive trading days ending on the third day prior to the date of the notice of redemption. At December 31, 1997, the Company had outstanding 125,000 Underwriters' Stock Warrants which entitle the holders thereof to purchase up to 125,000 shares of common stock at $8.70 per share. In addition, the Company had 62,500 Underwriters' Warrants entitling the holders to purchase up to 62,500 Warrants at $.125 per Warrant. The Warrants underlying the Underwriters' Warrants entitle the holders to purchase up to 62,500 shares of common stock at $8.70 per share. Both the Underwriters' Stock Warrants and the Underwriters' Warrants are exercisable during a four-year period commencing November 12, 1996. The Underwriters' Stock Warrants and Underwriters' Warrants contain antidilution provisions providing for adjustment upon the occurrence of certain events. Holders of the Company's warrants do not possess any rights as stockholders of the Company until they exercise their warrants and, accordingly, holders of the Company's warrants are not entitled to vote in matters submitted to the shareholders and are not entitled to receive dividends. RESTRICTIONS ON PAYMENT OF DIVIDENDS The Company has not paid dividends on its preferred stock or common stock to date. The Company is obligated to pay, quarterly, cumulative dividends at a rate of six percent (6%) per annum of the issue price of the Series A Convertible Preferred Stock, payable, at the holders' option, in cash or in common stock at the conversion price of the Series A Preferred Stock. So long as any shares of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock remain outstanding, the Company may not, without the vote or written consent of the holders of at least 66-2/3% of the then outstanding shares of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock, voting together as a single class, declare or pay any dividend with regard to any share of common stock. Additionally, although the current line of credit does not expressly prohibit the Company from paying dividends, the line of credit does contain certain covenants which restrict the reduction or depletion of the Company's capital. The Company anticipates that future financing, including any lines of credit, may further restrict or prohibit the Company's ability to pay dividends. Under the terms of the underwriting agreement entered into by the Company in connection with its initial public offering, the Company is restricted until November 20, 1998, from paying dividends in excess of the amount of the Company's current or retained earnings derived from November 20, 1996, unless the consent of the underwriters is obtained. The underwriting agreement has been terminated by the underwriter. STOCK SPLIT On September 11, 1996, the Board of Directors authorized a 1-for-1.9 reverse split of its common stock, which was effected on October 16, 1996. The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been retroactively restated to reflect such stock split. EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN The 1997 Employee Stock Purchase Plan of Bristol Retail Solutions, Inc. (the 1997 Employees Plan) was adopted by the Board of Directors and approved by the Company's stockholders at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders held on May 20, 1997. The 1997 Employees Plan allows eligible employees of the Company to subscribe for, and purchase shares of, the Company's common stock directly from the Company at a discount from the market price, in installments through authorized payroll deductions. A total of 200,000 shares of common stock are authorized to be issued. 42 Common stock is purchased on each semi-annual purchase date at a purchase price equal to eighty-five (85%) percent of the lower of (i) the fair market value per share of common stock on the entry date into that offering period or (ii) the fair market value per share on that semi-annual purchase date. The maximum number of shares of common stock purchasable per participant on any semi-annual purchase date shall not exceed 1,000 shares. Purchase rights are not granted under the 1997 Employees Plan to any eligible employee if such individual would, immediately after grant, own or hold outstanding options or other rights to purchase stock possessing five percent or more of the total combined voting power of all classes of stock of the Company or any of its corporate affiliates. As of December 31, 1997, no shares have been issued under the 1997 Employees Plan. EQUITY PARTICIPATION PLAN The 1996 Equity Participation Plan of Bristol Retail Solutions, Inc. (the Stock Option Plan) was adopted by the Board of Directors and approved by the written consent of the majority of the stockholders on July 31, 1996. The Stock Option Plan provides for the grant of stock options, restricted stock, performance awards, dividend equivalents, deferred stock, stock payments and stock appreciation rights to employees, consultants and affiliates. Options granted under the Stock Option Plan may be incentive stock options (ISOs) or nonstatutory stock options (NSOs). ISOs may be granted only to employees and the exercise price per share may not be less than 100% of the fair market value of a share of common stock on the grant date and the term of the options may not be more than ten years from the date of grant (110% of the fair market value and five years from the date of grant if the employee owns more than 10% of the total combined voting power of all classes of stock of the Company). All other stock awards may be granted to employees, consultants, or affiliates. The exercise price of NSOs shall be determined by a committee appointed by the Board of Directors to administer the Stock Option Plan (the Committee) but shall not be less than the par value of a share of common stock on the grant date. The term of the NSOs shall be determined by the Committee. On April 3, 1997, the Board of Directors amended the Stock Option Plan to increase the number of shares authorized to 2,450,000 from 450,000 shares of common stock. The increase was approved by the stockholders on May 20, 1997. At December 31, 1997, options to purchase 1,405,000 shares of common stock were outstanding at exercise prices ranging from $2.875 to $3.163 per share. All options vest at a rate of 25% per year commencing on the first anniversary of the grant date. No other stock-based awards have been offered under the Stock Option Plan. Of the options granted, 50,000 were granted to nonemployees and were accounted for at their fair value in accordance with SFAS No. 123. The remaining options were issued to employees and were accounted for in accordance with APB No. 25 (Note 1). SFAS No. 123 requires the calculation of pro forma information regarding net loss and net loss per share as if SFAS No. 123 had been adopted for options issued to employees. In calculating the pro forma information, the fair value was estimated at the date of grant using a Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following weighted average assumptions for the year ended December 31, 1997 and for the period from inception (April 3, 1996) to December 31, 1996: risk-free interest rates of 5.8% and 6.6%, respectively; dividend yield of 0%; volatility factors of the expected market price of the Company's common stock of 80% and 40%, respectively; and a weighted-average expected life of the options of five years. 43 For purposes of pro forma disclosures, the estimated fair value of the options is amortized to expense over the options' vesting period. The Company's pro forma information for the year ended December 31, 1997 and for the period from inception (April 3, 1996) to December 31, 1996 follows:
FROM INCEPTION YEAR ENDED (APRIL 3, 1996) TO DECEMBER 31, 1997 DECEMBER 31, 1996 ------------------ ------------------ Pro forma net loss $ (5,395,970) $ (197,257) Pro forma basic and diluted net loss per share $ (1.04) $ (0.06)
Option activity under the Stock Option Plan is as follows:
WEIGHTED-AVERAGE OPTIONS EXERCISE PRICE ------------------ ------------------ Outstanding - Inception (April 3, 1996) $ -- $ -- Granted 418,166 3.00 ----------------- Outstanding - December 31, 1996 418,166 3.00 Granted 1,092,500 3.01 Forfeited (105,666) (2.89) ------------------ Outstanding - December 31, 1997 1,405,000 $ 3.02 ================== Exercisable at end of period 99,375 $ 3.01 Weighted-average fair value of $ 2.11 options granted during the year
The weighted-average remaining term of options outstanding as of December 31, 1997 is 7.6 years. On September 11, 1997, all outstanding stock options held by employees, officers, Board members and non-employees were repriced at $2.875, the closing market price on that date. The number of shares and vesting schedule of the new option grants is the same as that of the old options replaced. The Company initiated this repricing arrangement in order to retain and motivate key employees. A total of 1,092,500 options with exercise prices ranging from $3.63 to $11.16 were repriced. The Company calculated the incremental impact of the option repricing on pro forma net income in accordance with the provisions of SFAS 123. The Company's calculation resulted in an incremental pro forma expense of $30,462 for 1997, which the Company believes is not material to the pro forma disclosures. The repricing had no impact on historical employee compensation expense, which the Company records under the provisions of APB No. 25, as the exercise price of the repriced options equals the stock value at the repricing date. The Company also calculated the impact of the repricing on non-employee options accounted for under SFAS 123 and determined the impact to be immaterial. SHARES RESERVED FOR FUTURE ISSUANCE At December 31, 1997, 2,151,250 shares of common stock were reserved for future issuance in connection with outstanding warrants and the Company's incentive stock option and employee stock purchase plans. 44 10. INCOME TAXES Significant components of the provision for income taxes are as follows: FROM INCEPTION (APRIL 3, 1996) YEAR ENDED TO DECEMBER 31, DECEMBER 31, 1997 1996 --------------- -------------- Current: Federal $ -- $ -- State 2,500 1,800 --------------- -------------- Total current 2,500 1,800 Deferred: Federal (1,118,651) (150,771) State (242,154) (44,159) Change in valuation allowance 1,360,805 194,930 --------------- -------------- Total deferred -- -- --------------- -------------- Provision for income taxes $ 2,500 $ 1,800 =============== ============== Deferred income taxes reflect the net tax effect of temporary differences between carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amount used for income tax purposes. Significant components of the Company's deferred tax assets and liabilities are as follows: DECEMBER 31, DECEMBER 31, 1997 1996 ------------ ------------ Deferred tax assets: Net operating loss $ 744,699 $ 5,326 Inventories 309,180 22,000 Allowance for doubtful accounts 164,686 15,636 Deferred revenue 103,839 97,000 Accrued compensation 114,941 22,663 Other reserves and allowances 134,983 39,749 ------------ ------------ Total deferred tax assets 1,572,328 202,374 Deferred tax liabilities: Tax over book depreciation (16,593) (7,444) ------------ ------------ Net deferred tax assets 1,555,735 194,930 Valuation allowance on net deferred tax assets (1,555,735) (194,930) ------------ ------------ Net deferred taxes $ -- $ -- ============ ============ The Company has recorded a valuation allowance against deferred tax assets as deemed necessary to reduce deferred tax assets to amounts that are more likely than not to be realized. A portion of the valuation allowance relates to acquired temporary differences that, when realized, will be recorded as an adjustment to goodwill. At December 31, 1997, the Company has federal net operating loss carryforwards of $1,741,000 that begin to expire in the year 2011. Pursuant to Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code, use of the Company's net operating loss and credit carryforwards for federal and state income tax purposes may be limited if the Company experiences a cumulative change in ownership of greater than 50% in a moving three-year period. Ownership changes could impact the Company's ability to utilize net operating losses and credit carryforwards remaining at the ownership change date. The limitation will be determined by the fair market value of common stock outstanding prior to the ownership change, multiplied by the applicable federal rate. The reconciliation of income tax computed at the U.S. federal statutory tax rates to income tax provision is: 45
FROM INCEPTION YEAR ENDED (APRIL 3, 1996) TO DECEMBER 31, 1997 DECEMBER 31, 1996 ------------------ ------------------ AMOUNT PERCENT AMOUNT PERCENT ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- Tax at U.S. statutory rates $(1,738,137) (35.0) $ (35,641) (34.0) State income taxes, net of federal tax benefit (258,238) (5.2) 1,800 1.7 Nondeductible goodwill 741,541 14.9 6,320 6.0 Change in valuation allowance 1,360,805 27.4 28,078 26.8 Other (103,471) (2.1) 1,243 1.2 ------------ ---------- ---------- ---------- $ 2,500 0.0 $ 1,800 1.7 ============ ========== ========== ==========
11. EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLAN The Company's wholly-owned subsidiaries CRI, ARS and Smyth each sponsors a Section 401(k) employees savings plan, covering substantially all full-time employees who have worked for more than one year. Discretionary contributions were $46,461 for the year ended December 31, 1997. CRI made discretionary contributions of $14,761 for the period from inception (April 3, 1996) to December 31, 1996. 12. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS The Company had various transactions with related parties which were made in the normal course of business. A summary of these transactions is as follows: PERIOD FROM YEAR INCEPTION ENDED (APRIL 3, 1996) DECEMBER 31, To DECEMBER 31, 1997 1996 --------------- --------------- Cash register purchases from R.S.M.G., which has an officer of Smyth as an officer and member of its Board of Directors $ 421,746 $ -- Note paid to RBC, Inc., a company owned by the president of CRI 40,000 -- Rent paid to a director of CRI 48,000 15,000 Rent paid to Pollastro Properties, Inc., owned by the former owners of ARS certain of whom are now officers of ARS 173,760 -- Auto leases paid to ARS Leasing Co, owned by an officer of ARS 18,628 -- Payment from president of ARS (47,767) -- Insurance premiums paid for insurance coverage purchased through a broker who is a family member of a director and officer of the 73,845 121,634 Company Facility lease transactions with related parties are further discussed in Note 8, Commitments and Contingencies. Amounts payable to (due from) related parties were as follows: DECEMBER 31, DECEMBER 31, 1997 1996 ------------ ------------ Insurance premiums for insurance coverage purchased through a broker who is a family member of a director and officer of the Company $ 112,088 $ -- R.S.M.G., which has an officer of Smyth as an officer and a member of its Board of Directors 21,613 -- RBC, Inc., a company owned by the president of CRI -- 40,000 Pollastro Properties, Inc., owned by the former owners of ARS, certain of whom are now officers of ARS -- (7,000) President of ARS -- (60,028) 46 13. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS On March 18, 1998, the Company entered into a definitive agreement for a private placement of shares of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock ("the Preferred Stock"). The investment commitment is up to $2,000,000 and will be issued in three installments. The first installment of $1,000,000 funded on March 18, 1998. The Preferred Stock agreement also contains certain registration rights. The second and third installments of $500,000 each will close within thirty and sixty days, respectively, after the effective date of the Company's registration statement on Form S-3 to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, assuming that the various conditions set forth in the purchase agreement are met. The Preferred Stock is convertible by the holders into common stock of the Company at any time into a number of shares of common stock determined by dividing the issue price by the conversion price, which is defined to be 78% of the lowest five-day average closing bid price for the 25-day period prior to the date of the conversion notice. At no time shall the conversion price be higher than 110% of the five-day average bid price prior to the date such shares were purchased. The dividends on the Preferred Stock are payable quarterly in stock or in cash. The purchaser of the Preferred Stock received warrants to purchase 125,000 shares for the first $1,000,000 installment. The amounts that may be purchased under the second and third installments are limited by a provision in the Preferred Stock agreements that prohibits the purchaser from owning more than 20% of the Company's common stock on an as converted basis. The Preferred Stock issuance will result in an increase in net loss available for common stockholders for amounts relating to accretion of the recorded value of the Preferred Stock to its liquidation value of $242,000, the value of the preferential conversion feature of the Preferred Stock recorded as imputed dividends of $228,000 and cumulative preferred dividends of $2,000. If this transaction had occurred before the end of the period, the effect of the Preferred Stock by application of the if-converted method on the Company's weighted-average common shares outstanding for the year ended December 31, 1997 would have been antidilutive. 47
EX-11 2 STATEMENT OF COMPUTATION PER SHARE EXHIBIT 11 BRISTOL RETAIL SOLUTIONS, INC. COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE
INCEPTION YEAR ENDED (APRIL 3, 1996) TO DECEMBER 31, DECEMBER 31, 1997 1996 --------------- --------------- BASIC LOSS PER SHARE Net loss $ (4,968,607) $ (106,625) =============== =============== Weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period 5,198,156 3,319,738 =============== =============== Basic loss per share $ (.96) $ (.03) =============== =============== DILUTED LOSS PER SHARE Net loss $ (4,968,607) $ (106,625) =============== =============== Weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period 5,198,156 3,319,738 =============== =============== Effect of stock options and warrants treated as common stock equivalents under the treasury stock method -- -- --------------- --------------- Total shares 5,198,156 3,319,738 =============== =============== Diluted loss per share $ (.96) $ (.03) =============== ===============
EX-21 3 LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES EXHIBIT 21 LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES NAME STATE OF INCORPORATION ---------------------- ---------------------- Cash Registers, Incorporated Kentucky Automated Retail Systems, Inc. Washington Smyth Systems, Inc. Delaware Pacific Merger Corp. Delaware EX-23.1 4 CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG Exhibit 23.1 CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 333-5570-LA, 333-43899 and 333-50385 on Form S-3, Form S-8 and Form S-3, respectively, of our report dated March 27, 1997, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Bristol Retail Solutions, Inc. as of December 31, 1996, and for the period from inception (April 3, 1996) to December 31, 1996 included in its Annual Report (Form 10-KSB/A) for the year ended December 31, 1997 as amended on April 16, 1998, June 10, 1998, August 5, 1998 and on August 13, 1998. /s/ Ernst & Young LLP - ---------------------------------------------- Orange County, California August 13, 1998 EX-23.2 5 CONSENT OF DELOITTE & TOUCHE Exhibit 23.2 INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No. 333-5570-LA and No. 333-43899 on Form S-3 and Form S-8, respectively, and in Amendment No. 3 to Registration Statement No. 333-50385 on Form S-3 of our report dated March 27, 1998 appearing in the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB/A of Bristol Retail Solutions, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 1997. /s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP - ---------------------------------------------- Costa Mesa, California August 13, 1998 EX-23.3 6 CONSENT OF DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP Exhibit 23.3 INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Annual Report of Bristol Retail Solutions, Inc. on Form 10-KSB/A for the year ended December 31, 1997 of our report dated June 5, 1997 (relating to the financial statements of Smyth Systems, Inc.), appearing in the current report on Form 8-K/A of Bristol Retail Solutions, Inc. filed on July 29, 1997. /s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP - ---------------------------------------------- Akron, Ohio August 13, 1998 EX-27 7
5 YEAR DEC-31-1997 JAN-01-1997 DEC-31-1997 715929 0 3202787 0 3314029 7799985 759725 0 13811630 7536419 0 0 0 5548 6187838 13811630 21088487 21088487 14693444 11381340 20190 0 0 (4966107) 2500 (4968607) 0 0 0 (4968607) (0.96) (0.96)
-----END PRIVACY-ENHANCED MESSAGE-----