-----BEGIN PRIVACY-ENHANCED MESSAGE----- Proc-Type: 2001,MIC-CLEAR Originator-Name: webmaster@www.sec.gov Originator-Key-Asymmetric: MFgwCgYEVQgBAQICAf8DSgAwRwJAW2sNKK9AVtBzYZmr6aGjlWyK3XmZv3dTINen TWSM7vrzLADbmYQaionwg5sDW3P6oaM5D3tdezXMm7z1T+B+twIDAQAB MIC-Info: RSA-MD5,RSA, Qw3cFdIOwmlnXF3jbk7b6uqYJ2gdcp6X38OEGqV3c4xrqzsmfzGI93q+fRq95AZw snYJvcqK1ZzGIv57v0/0UA== 0001206774-10-001292.txt : 20100517 0001206774-10-001292.hdr.sgml : 20100517 20100517163043 ACCESSION NUMBER: 0001206774-10-001292 CONFORMED SUBMISSION TYPE: 10-Q PUBLIC DOCUMENT COUNT: 5 CONFORMED PERIOD OF REPORT: 20100331 FILED AS OF DATE: 20100517 DATE AS OF CHANGE: 20100517 FILER: COMPANY DATA: COMPANY CONFORMED NAME: INTELLIGROUP INC CENTRAL INDEX KEY: 0001016439 STANDARD INDUSTRIAL CLASSIFICATION: SERVICES-COMPUTER INTEGRATED SYSTEMS DESIGN [7373] IRS NUMBER: 112880025 STATE OF INCORPORATION: NJ FISCAL YEAR END: 1231 FILING VALUES: FORM TYPE: 10-Q SEC ACT: 1934 Act SEC FILE NUMBER: 000-20943 FILM NUMBER: 10839028 BUSINESS ADDRESS: STREET 1: 499 THORNALL STREET CITY: EDISON STATE: NJ ZIP: 08837 BUSINESS PHONE: 7325901600 MAIL ADDRESS: STREET 1: 499 THORNALL STREET CITY: EDISON STATE: NJ ZIP: 08837 10-Q 1 intelligroup_10q.htm QUARTERLY REPORT intelligroup_10q.htm
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, DC 20549
 
FORM 10-Q
 
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 
For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2010
 
Commission file number 0-20943
INTELLIGROUP, INC.
 
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)

New Jersey       11-2880025
 
(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
Organization)
 
5 Independence Way, Suite 220, Princeton, New Jersey 08540
 
(Address of Principal Executive Offices) (Zip Code)

(646) 810-7400
 
(Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes  x  No  o
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate website, if any, every interactive data file required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).     o Yes     o No
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
 
Large accelerated filer:     o Accelerated filer:     o Non-accelerated filer:     o Smaller Reporting Company     x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 12b-2).
Yes  o  No  x
 
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the registrant’s classes of common stock, as of May 10, 2010:
Class Number of Shares
Common Stock, $.01 par value 41,249,688


TABLE OF CONTENTS
 
      Page
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
 
Item 1. Financial statements
 
Condensed consolidated balance sheets as of March 31, 2010 (unaudited) and December 31, 2009 4
 
Condensed consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income for the three month period ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 (unaudited) 5
 
Consolidated statements of cash flows for the three month period ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 6
 
Notes to condensed consolidated financial statements 7
 
Item 2. Management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations 21
 
Item 3. Quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk 31
 
Item 4. Controls and procedures 31
 
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
 
Item 1. Legal proceedings 32
 
Item 1a. Risk factors 32
 
Item 2. Unregistered sales of equity securities and use of proceeds 32
 
Item 4. Removed and Reserved 32
       
Item 5. Other Information   32
 
Item 6. Exhibits 32
 
Signatures 34

2
 

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
 
This quarterly report on Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Forward-looking statements include, among other things, business strategy and expectations concerning industry conditions, market position, future operations, margins, profitability, liquidity and capital resources. Forward-looking statements generally can be identified by the use of terminology such as “may,” “will,” “expect,” “intend,” “estimate,” “anticipate” or “believe” or similar expressions or the negatives thereof. These expectations are based on management’s assumptions and current beliefs based on currently available information. Although the Company believes that the expectations reflected in such statements are reasonable, it can give no assurance that such expectations will be correct. You are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date of this quarterly report on Form 10-Q and the Company does not have any obligation to update the forward looking statements. The Company’s operations are subject to a number of uncertainties, risks and other influences, many of which are outside its control, and any one of which, or a combination of which, could cause its actual results of operations to differ materially from the forward-looking statements. Important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from its expectations are disclosed in Part I, Item 2, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” and listed under Item 1A “Risk Factors” in our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 and elsewhere in this quarterly report on Form 10-Q.
 
3
 

INTELLIGROUP, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
AS OF MARCH 31, 2010 and DECEMBER 31, 2009
(In thousands except par value)
 
March 31 December 31
      2010       2009
ASSETS (Unaudited)  
CURRENT ASSETS
       Cash and cash equivalents $       23,232 $         20,783
       Short-term investments 2,818 2,441
       Accounts receivable, less allowance for doubtful accounts of $2,105 and $2,176  
       at March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively   20,663 23,677
       Unbilled services, less allowance for doubtful accounts of $105 and $136 at
       March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively 9,085 6,433
       Deferred tax assets 783 644
       Prepaid expenses and prepaid taxes 1,125 1,092
       Other current assets 805 741
Total current assets 58,511 55,811
Property and equipment, net 2,825 3,085
Goodwill 1,518 1,616
Intangible assets, net 192 272
Restricted cash and investments 522 1,202
Prepaid taxes - Non-adjustable, less allowance for doubtful accounts of $108 and
$104 at March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively 1,416 1,130
Deferred tax assets 535 856
Other assets 4,242 3,431
Total Assets $ 69,761 $ 67,403
 
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
CURRENT LIABILITIES
       Accounts payable $ 1,878 $ 1,418
       Liability on derivative instruments 17 389
       Accrued payroll and related taxes 10,098 10,899
       Accrued expenses 3,091 3,493
       Other current liabilities 2,104 1,425
       Unearned revenue 1,155 1,353
       Income tax payable 186 261
       Capital lease and deferred payments 341 481
Total current liabilities 18,870 19,719
Obligations under capital lease, net of current portion 176 214
Unearned revenue, net of current portion 267 322
Other long-term liabilities 849 844
Total Liabilities 20,162 21,099
 
SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
       Preferred stock, $.01 par value, 5,000 shares authorized, none issued or outstanding — —
       Common stock, $.01 par value, 65,000 shares authorized
       at March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009; 41,250 and 41,137 shares issued
       and outstanding at March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively 413 411
       Additional paid-in capital 71,337 71,090
       Accumulated deficit (21,287 ) (23,300 )
       Accumulated other comprehensive loss (864 ) (1,897 )
              Total shareholders’ equity 49,599 46,304
 
              Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity $ 69,761 $ 67,403
 

See accompanying notes
 
4
 

INTELLIGROUP, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
(UNAUDITED)
(In thousands, except per share data)
 
THREE MONTHS PERIOD ENDED
MARCH 31,
      2010       2009
Revenue $ 33,544 $ 30,869  
Cost of revenue (exclusive of depreciation and amortization)   22,886   21,248
       Gross profit 10,658 9,621
 
Selling, general and administrative expenses 7,032 7,257
Depreciation and amortization 552 554
       Total operating expenses 7,584 7,811
 
       Operating income 3,074 1,810
 
Interest income 54 32
Interest expense (20 ) (20 )
Foreign currency transaction gain (loss), net (782 ) (615 )
Other income (expense), net 176 99
 
Income before income taxes 2,502 1,307
Provision for income taxes 489 530
Net income $ 2,013 $ 777
 
Basic net income per share $ 0.05 $ 0.02
Diluted net income per share $ 0.05 $ 0.02
 
Weighted average no. of common shares
       outstanding - Basic 41,167 41,719
- Diluted 42,459 41,740
 
Comprehensive income
       Net income $ 2,013 $ 777
       Other comprehensive income (loss)
              Currency translation adjustments 1,033 (979 )
 
Comprehensive income $ 3,046 $ (202 )
 

See accompanying notes.
 
5
 

INTELLIGROUP, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
FOR THREE MONTH ENDED MARCH 31, 2010 AND 2009
(UNAUDITED)
(USD in thousands)
 
THREE MONTHS PERIOD
ENDED MARCH 31,
      2010       2009
Cash flows from operating activities:      
       Net income $ 2,013   $ 777
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net  
       Cash provided by operating activities:  
       Depreciation and amortization 683 671
       Provision for doubtful accounts and advances (54 ) (81 )
       Stock compensation expense 31 199
       Profit on sale of investment (48 ) -
       Unrealized gain on investments (72 ) -
       Profit on sale of fixed assets (36 ) -
       Unrealized exchange loss 619 430
       Deferred taxes 228 (140 )
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
       Accounts receivable 2,930 565
       Unbilled services (2,746 ) 5,109
       Prepaid taxes (14 ) (120 )
       Prepaid expenses and other current assets (87 ) 262
       Other assets (241 ) 66
       Restricted cash and investments 35 710
       Derivative liability (218 ) (674 )
       Accounts payable 449 272
       Accrued payroll and related taxes (808 ) (1,828 )
       Accrued expenses and other current liabilities 264 (847 )
       Deferred revenue, Current portion (156 ) 785
       Deferred revenue, net of current portion (34 ) -
       Income taxes payable (226 ) 131
       Other long-term liabilities - (141 )
Net cash provided by operating activities $ 2,512 $ 6,146
 
Cash flows from investing activities:
       Purchase of property and equipment $ (507 ) $ (130 )
       Proceeds from sale of equipment 37 -
       Purchases of investments (6,707 ) (741 )
       Proceeds from sale of investments 6,755 -
Net cash used in investing activities $ (422 ) $ (871 )
 
Cash flows from financing activities:
       Principal payments under capital leases $ (35 ) $ (232 )
       Stock repurchase - (881 )
       Proceeds from exercise of stock options 217 -
Net cash provided/(used) in financing activities $ 182 $ (1,113 )
 
Effect of foreign currency exchange rate changes on cash $ 177 $ (173 )
 
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents 2,449 3,989
Cash and cash equivalents - beginning of year $ 20,783 $ 10,161
Cash and cash equivalents - end of the period $        23,232 $        14,150
 

See accompanying notes
 
6
 

INTELLIGROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
March 31, 2010 and 2009
 
NOTE 1- BASIS OF PRESENTATION
 
     The condensed consolidated financial statements and accompanying financial information as of March 31, 2010 and for the three month period ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 are unaudited and, in the opinion of management, include all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring adjustments) which the Company considers necessary for a fair presentation of the financial position of the Company at such dates and the operating results and cash flows for those periods. The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements included herein have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and the instructions of Form 10-Q and Rule 10-01 of Regulation S-X. Pursuant to accounting requirements of the Securities and Exchange Commission applicable to quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and these notes do not include all disclosures required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for audited financial statements. Accordingly, these statements should be read in conjunction with the accounting policies and notes to consolidated financial statements included in the Company’s consolidated financial statements included in our annual report filed on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009.
 
     The amounts for the December 31, 2009 balance sheet have been extracted from the audited consolidated financial statements included in our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009.
 
     The results of the Company’s operations for the three months period ended March 31, 2010 are not necessarily indicative of the results of operations to be expected for the full year ending December 31, 2010.
 
NOTE 2- SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
 
Principles of Consolidation
 
     The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Intelligroup, Inc. and subsidiaries that are more than 50% owned and controlled and have been prepared in US dollars. All inter-company balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
 
Use of Estimates
 
     The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
 
Cash and Cash Equivalents
 
     The Company considers all highly liquid debt instruments and other short-term investments with a maturity of three months or less, when purchased, to be cash equivalents.
 
     The Company maintains cash and cash equivalent balances at several financial institutions that are insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation up to $250,000. The Company maintains cash balances in excess of insured amounts.
 
     The Company did not have any cash equivalents as of March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009.
 
Revenue Recognition and Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
 
     The Company generates revenue from professional services rendered to customers. Revenue is recognized under the Company’s contracts generally when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, the sales price is fixed or determinable and collectibility is reasonably assured. The majority of our revenue is generated under time-and-material contracts whereby costs and revenue are recognized as services are performed, with the corresponding cost of providing those services reflected as cost of revenue. The majority of customers are billed on an hourly or daily basis whereby actual time is charged directly to the customer. Such method is expected to result in reasonably consistent profit margins over the contract term.
 
7
 

INTELLIGROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
March 31, 2010 and 2009
 
NOTE 2- SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)
 
     The Company also derives a portion of revenue from fixed-price, fixed-time contracts. Revenue generated from most fixed-price contracts, including most application management and support contracts, is recognized ratably over the contract term. Certain fixed price contracts are for implementation services, including design and modification, for which specifications are provided by the customer. The scope of the work is usually defined in terms of overall deliverables and the revenue for such work is ultimately earned by achieving the deliverables. We consider the performance of service towards the planned deliverable as partial execution of the deliverable and hence the revenue generated from such fixed-price contracts is recognized using the percentage of completion (POC) method. The POC method recognizes the legal and economic results of contract performance on a timely basis. This method of accounting relies on estimates of total expected contract revenues and costs. Where the contracts involve only implementation services, the Company recognizes revenue based on a proportional performance method. The pattern of performance on these contracts closely resembles the time spent by our employees and therefore efforts-expended, measured based on the cost of the employee’s time, is used as a measure for the proportion of services rendered in relation to the total services expected to be rendered.
 
     The use of the POC method or the proportional performance method requires significant judgment relative to estimating the number of hours or days required to complete the contracted scope of work, including assumptions and estimates relative to the length of time to complete the project and the nature and complexity of the work to be performed. Our project delivery and business unit finance personnel continually review labor hours incurred and estimated total labor hours, which may result in revisions to the amount of recognized revenue for the contract. Changes in estimates are accounted for in the period of change. If we do not accurately estimate the resources required or the scope of work to be performed for a contract or if we do not manage the project properly within the planned time period, then a loss may have to be recognized on the contract. Losses are recorded in the period when they become known, and estimated through the completion of the contract.
 
     We occasionally derive revenue from projects involving multiple revenue-generating activities. Accordingly, the revenue from such projects is accounted for in accordance with Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC) 605-25 (Previously Emerging Issues Task Force of the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Issue No. 00-21), “Accounting for Revenue Arrangements with Multiple Deliverables.” If a contract involves the provision of multiple service elements, total estimated contract revenue is allocated to each element based on the fair value of each element. The amount of revenue allocated to each element is limited to the amount that is not contingent upon the delivery of another element in the future. Revenue for each element is then recognized as described above depending upon whether the contract is a time-and-materials contract or a fixed-price, fixed-time contract.
 
     Any estimation process, including that used in preparing contract accounting models, involves inherent risk. We reduce the inherent risk relating to revenue and cost estimates in proportional performance models through approval and monitoring processes. Risks relating to service delivery, usage, productivity and other factors are considered in the estimation process.
 
     The Company accrues for revenue and receivables for services rendered between the last billing date and the balance sheet date. Unbilled services as of March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009 represent services provided through the three months period ended March 31, 2010 and the year ended December 31, 2009, respectively, which is billed subsequent to the balance sheet date. All such amounts are anticipated to be collected in the following year.
 
     Reimbursements of out-of-pocket expenses received from clients have been included as part of revenues in accordance with ASC No. 605-45 (previously EITF 01-14), “Income Statement Characterization of Reimbursements Received for “Out-of-Pocket” Expenses Incurred.”
 
8
 

INTELLIGROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
March 31, 2010 and 2009
 
NOTE 2- SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)
 
     We establish billing terms at the time project deliverables are agreed, and we continually monitor timely payments from customers and assess collection issues. We maintain allowances for doubtful accounts for estimated losses resulting from the inability of our clients to make required payments. We base our estimates on historical collection and write-off experience, current trends, credit policy, detailed analysis of specific client situations and percentage of accounts receivable by aging category.
 
Earnings per Common Share
 
     Basic net income per share is computed using the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted earnings per share include additional dilution from potential common stock, such as stock issuable pursuant to the exercise of stock options. Potential common stock is not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share when the exercise price of the outstanding options exceeds the current market value or the Company reports a loss because to do so would be anti-dilutive for the periods presented.
 
     For the three month periods ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively, the weighted average number of shares used in calculating diluted earnings per share includes stock options for 1,291,759 and 21,206 respectively.
 
     For the three month periods ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively, options to purchase, 143,825 and 2,902,817 shares of common stock were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share because inclusion would have been anti-dilutive.
 
Income Taxes
 
     The Company accounts for income taxes using the asset and liability method of accounting for income taxes. Under this method, income tax expense is recognized for the amount of taxes payable or refundable for the current year. In addition, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their tax bases and all operating loss carry forwards, if any. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates or tax status is recognized in the consolidated statement of income in the period that includes the enactment date or the filing/ approval date of the tax status change. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance if, based on the weight of available evidence, it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized.
 
     The Company applies a two-step approach for recognizing and measuring uncertain tax positions. The first step is to evaluate the tax position for recognition by determining, based on the technical merits, that the position will be more likely than not sustained upon examination. The second step is to measure the tax benefit as the largest amount of the tax benefit that is greater than 50% likely of being realized upon settlement. The Company includes interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits within its provision for income tax expense.
 
     The Company records tax expense/benefit based upon the taxable income/loss recorded in each tax jurisdiction. The Company recorded an income tax expense of $0.5 million and $0.5 million on a pretax income of $2.5 million and $1.3 million for the three month periods ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
 
     The effective tax rate has decreased to 19.5% during the three months period ended March 31, 2010 from 40.6% during the three months period ended March 31, 2009. Changes in the effective rate of taxes are due to the changes in the geographic distribution of our income and changes in non taxable income. The difference between the income tax rates for the 2010 and 2009 periods and the statutory rate is primarily due to the utilization of carried forward net operating losses in the U.S. locations on which a full valuation allowance has been recorded and earnings taxed in countries that have rates lower than the United States.
 
     The Company’s India subsidiary received tax assessments for the fiscal years ended March 31, 1998 through 2003 and fiscal year ended March 31, 2005 through 2008, challenging the tax exemptions of certain revenue earned and disallowing certain expenses. The Company has deposited additional tax of INR 49.1 million (or approximately $1.1 million) under protest, net of allowance of $0.1 million, as at March 31, 2010 consequent to the above tax assessments.
 
9
 

     During the year ended December 31, 2009, the Company deposited an amount of INR 2.8 million (or approximately $0.1 million) under protest against the order passed by the tax authorities challenging certain tax exemptions the Company was previously permitted to take for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2001. Further, for the tax year ended March 31, 2005, an amount of INR 20.4 million (or approximately $0.4 million) had also been deposited by the Company under protest, during the 2009, against an assessment order passed by the tax authorities, challenging the transfer pricing methodology followed by the Company and non submission of evidence in support of foreign inward remittance. The Company also received an order from the tax authorities demanding an additional payment of INR 8 million (or approximately $0.2 million) for open assessments pertaining to fiscal years ending March 31, 2001 and 2005. The Company has not recorded a reserve on the additional tax paid under protest as it believes its tax position will most likely be sustained based on independent merits.
 
     U.S. and Indian transfer pricing regulations require that any international transaction involving associated enterprises be at an arm’s-length price. Transactions among the Company’s subsidiaries and the Company may be required to satisfy such requirements. Accordingly, the Company determines the pricing among its associated enterprises on the basis of detailed functional and economic analysis involving benchmarking against transactions among entities that are not under common control. If the applicable income tax authorities review any of the Company’s tax returns and determine that the transfer price applied was not appropriate, the Company may incur increased tax liability, including accrued interest and penalties.
 
Goodwill and Intangibles
 
     The Company does not amortize goodwill but instead tests goodwill at the reporting unit level for impairment at least annually or as circumstances warrant. If impairment is indicated, a write down to fair value (normally measured discounting estimated cash flows) is recorded. Other intangibles represent customer relationships which are amortized on a straight line basis over their estimated useful lives.
 
Pension Plan Liability
 
     The Company provides its employees in India with benefits under a defined benefit pension plan, referred to as the “Gratuity Plan”. The Gratuity Plan provides a lump sum payment to vested employees on retirement or on termination of employment in an amount based on the respective employee’s salary and years of employment. The Company determines its liability under the Gratuity Plan by actuarial valuation using the projected unit credit method. Under this method, the Company determines liability based upon the discounted value of salary increases until the date of separation arising from retirement, death, resignation or other termination of services. Critical assumptions used in measuring the plan expense and projected liability under the projected unit credit method include the discount rate, expected return on assets and the expected increase in the compensation rates. The Company evaluates these critical assumptions at least annually. The Company periodically evaluates and updates other assumptions used in the projected unit credit method involving demographic factors, such as retirement age and turnover rate, to reflect its experience. The mortality rates used are consistent with those published by the Life Insurance Corporation of India.
 
10
 

INTELLIGROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
March 31, 2010 and 2009
 
NOTE 2- SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)
 
     The discount rate enables the Company to state expected future cash flows at a present value on the measurement date. The discount rate used is equal to the yield on high quality fixed income investments in India at the measurement date. The expected rate of return on plan assets is estimated based on available market information, Indian law which regulates such investments and historical returns. The measurement date for these employee retirement benefits coincides with reporting date of the financial statements.
 
Share-Based Compensation Plans
 
     The Company’s share-based compensation plans are described in Note 6. The Company adopted the provisions of ASC 718 (previously SFAS No. 123R) on January 1, 2006, using the modified prospective transition method.
 
     During the three months period ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, total no. of options granted were 30,000 and 0 respectively. The Company recognizes compensation expense for all share-based payment awards based on the grant date fair value estimated in accordance with the provisions of ASC 718.
 
     The fair value of each option award is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option valuation model. The Company recognizes the fair value of each option as compensation expense ratably using the straight-line attribution method over the service period (generally the vesting period). The Black-Scholes model incorporates the following assumptions:
  • Expected volatility – the Company estimates the volatility of common stock at the date of grant using a combination of unadjusted historical volatility, and historical volatility adjusted for periods of unusual stock price activity.
     
  • Expected term – the Company estimates the expected term of options granted based on a combination of vesting schedules, life of the option, historical experience and in cases where the Company does not have significant historical experience, the simplified method of determining expected term outlined in ASC 718 (previously Staff Accounting Bulletin(“SAB”) 107 and SAB 110) is used.
     
  • Risk-free interest rate – the Company estimates the risk-free interest rate using the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant for periods equal to the expected life of the options.
     
  • Dividends – the Company uses an expected dividend yield of zero since it has never declared or paid any dividends on its capital stock. The Company intends to retain any earnings to fund future growth and the operation of its business, and, therefore does not anticipate paying any cash dividends in the foreseeable future.
     Additionally, the Company estimates forfeitures at the time of grant and revises those estimates in subsequent periods if actual forfeitures differ from those estimates. It uses a combination of historical data, demographic characteristics and other factors to estimate pre-vesting option forfeitures and record share-based compensation expense only for those awards that are expected to vest. The Company issued 112,600 shares upon exercise of options during the three months period ended March 31, 2010. There were no shares issued on exercise of options during the three month period ended March 31, 2009.
 
11
 

INTELLIGROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
March 31, 2010 and 2009
 
NOTE 2- SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)
 
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
 
     In August 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2009-05, “Measuring Liabilities at Fair Value” (“ASU 2009-05”). The amendments in this ASU apply to all entities that measure liabilities at fair value and provide clarification that in circumstances, in which a quoted price in an active market for the identical liability is not available, an entity is required to measure fair value using one or more techniques laid out in this ASU. The guidance provided in this ASU is effective for the first reporting period (including reporting periods) beginning after issuance. The implementation of this standard did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
 
     In October 2009, the FASB issued ASU 2009-13, “Multiple-Deliverable Revenue Arrangements”, (amendments to FASB ASC Topic 605, Revenue Recognition) (“ASU 2009-13”). In September 2009, the FASB ratified Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2009-13 (ASU 2009-13) (previously Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) Issue No. 08-1, Revenue Arrangements with Multiple Deliverables (EITF 08-1)). ASU 2009-13 superseded EITF 00-21 and addresses criteria for separating the consideration in multiple-element arrangements. ASU 2009-13 will require companies to allocate the overall consideration to each deliverable by using a best estimate of the selling price of individual deliverables in the arrangement in the absence of vendor-specific objective evidence or other third-party evidence of the selling price. ASU 2009-13 will be effective prospectively for revenue arrangements entered into or materially modified in fiscal years beginning on or after June 15, 2010 and early adoption will be permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the potential impact, if any, of the adoption of ASU 2009-13 on its consolidated results of operations and financial condition and whether it will adopt the standard early. ASU 2009-13 will become effective for the Company with its fiscal year beginning January 1, 2011.
 
     In January 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-06, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures”, (amendments to FASB ASC Topic 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures) (“ASU 2010-06”). ASU 2010-06 requires entities to disclose separately the amounts of significant transfers in and out of Level 1 and Level 2 fair value measurements along with the reasons for such transfers. Entities should also present separate information about purchases, sales, issuances and settlement activity in Level 3 fair value measurements. The ASU 2010-06 requires entities to provide fair value measurement disclosures for each class of assets and liabilities and disclosures about inputs and valuation techniques. The new disclosures and clarifications of existing disclosures are effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2009 except for the disclosures pertaining to Level 3 fair value measurements. Those disclosures are effective for interim and fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2010. This ASU 2010-06 is effective for the Company with its interim period beginning January 1, 2010. The Company adopted the disclosure requirements of the standard effective January 1, 2010 to the extent applicable. The implementation of this standard did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
 
12
 

INTELLIGROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
March 31, 2010 and 2009
 
NOTE 3- LINE OF CREDIT
 
     On May 22, 2008, the Company entered into a revolving credit loan and security agreement (“Credit Agreement”) with HSBC Bank, (the “Bank”). The Credit Agreement is comprised of a three year revolving line of credit pursuant to which the Company can borrow up to $10 million at the Bank’s Base Rate (as defined in the Credit Agreement) of 3.25% as of March 31, 2010, minus 0.85% percent. The credit facility is collateralized by substantially all of the assets of the United States based operations and all subsidiary stock (not to exceed 65% of the Equity Interests of any Foreign Subsidiary). The maximum borrowing availability under the Credit Agreement is based upon a percentage of eligible billed and unbilled accounts receivable. The Credit Agreement provides for certain financial covenants that shall only be tested as of the end of any fiscal quarter.
 
     The Company was in compliance with the applicable financial covenants of the Credit Agreement as of March 31, 2010.
 
     A standby letter of credit of $0.1million has been issued by and drawn upon HSBC banking corporation in favor of a landlord as security deposit. This letter of credit is secured by a lien on the assets of the company. The Company estimates undrawn availability under the Credit Facility to be $9.9 million as of March 31, 2010.
 
     The Company is prohibited from paying dividends under the terms of the Credit Agreement.
 
NOTE 4- RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
 
     Effective August 1, 2005, Intelligroup Asia Pvt. Ltd. (“IGA”) entered into an agreement to lease certain premises for certain of the Company’s India operations from ILabs Hyderabad Technology Center Pvt. Ltd. (“ILabs”), a party with which two members of the Company’s Board of Directors are affiliated. The terms of the lease agreement provide for, among other things: (1) a minimum lease period of five years with an option for two three-year renewal periods; (2) payment of a security deposit equivalent to nine (9) months’ rent in the amount of 16.3 million Indian rupees (approximately $0.4 million); (3) payment of monthly lease fees in the amount of 1.7 million Indian rupees (approximately $0.04 million), subject to yearly five percent (5%) escalation; and (4) monthly operations and maintenance fees of 0.5 million Indian rupees (approximately $0.01 million). During the three month period ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, the Company recorded rent expense towards the said lease of 8.4 million rupees (approximately $0.2 million) and 7.7 million rupees (approximately $0.17 million) respectively. There are no advance lease rentals as of March 31, 2010.
 
     Effective December 10, 2009, IGA entered into an agreement to lease certain additional premises for certain of the Company’s India operations from ILabs. The lease of demised premises commencing from January 1, 2010 and terms of the lease agreement provide for, among other things: (1) a minimum lease period of 3 years with an option for two three-year renewal periods with both the lessee and the lessor; (2) payment of a security deposit equivalent to four (4) months’ rent in the amount of 2 million Indian rupees (approximately $0.05 million); (3) payment of monthly lease fees in the amount of 0.5 million Indian rupees (approximately $0.01 million), subject to fifteen percent (15%) escalation once in every three years; (4) monthly operations and maintenance fees of 0.1 million Indian rupees (approximately $0.002 million). Rent expense for the three month period ended March 31, 2010 towards the said lease was 1.9 million rupees (approximately $0.04 million). There are no advance lease rentals as of March 31, 2010.
 
NOTE 5- LITIGATION
 
     There is no pending litigation to which the Company is a party or to which any of its property is subject that would have a material impact on its consolidated financial condition, results of operations or cash flows in the event we were unsuccessful in such litigation. However, the Company cannot predict with certainty the outcome of any litigation or the potential for future litigation and any such matters could adversely affect its financial condition, results of operations, cash flows and business.
 
13
 

INTELLIGROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
March 31, 2010 and 2009
 
NOTE 6- SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
 
     Share-Based Compensation Plans
 
     The Company has four share-based compensation plans that reserve common shares for issuance to key employees, consultants and directors. The compensation cost that has been charged against income for those plans was $0.03 million for the three months period ended March 31, 2010 and $0.2 million for the three months period ended March 31, 2009. The Company did not recognize income tax benefit in the condensed consolidated statement of operations and comprehensive income for the first three months of 2010 or 2009, due to its accumulated net operating losses. The total options forfeited during the three month period ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 were 98,725 and 0 respectively.
 
Stock Options:
 
     The fair value of option grants is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. There were 30,000 options granted during the three months period ended March 31, 2010. There were no grants issued during the three months period ended March 31, 2009.
 
Three Months
Period Ended March 31,
                  2010       2009
Expected Volatility 66.00%   -
  Expected Life(years)   6.06 years   -
Risk free Interest Rate 2.73%   -
Expected Dividends 0%   -

     The weighted average grant date fair value of options granted during the three months period ended March 31, 2010 was $2.18.
 
     As of March 31, 2010, there was $0.4 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to the stock options. The weighted average period over which the cost expected to be recognized is 1.2 years.
 
14
 

INTELLIGROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
March 31, 2010 and 2009
 
NOTE 6- SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY (Continued)
 
     Share Repurchase Program:
 
     On October 24 2008, our Board of Directors approved a share repurchase program of up to $5,000,000 of the Company's common stock over an 18 month period ending April 24, 2010. The share repurchase program was funded using the Company's working capital and authorized the Company to repurchase shares from time to time through open market or privately negotiated transactions. The program expired on April 24, 2010 and there has been no repurchase of shares after March 31, 2010.
 
     As of March 31, 2010, a total of 1,197,881 shares have been repurchased at an average price of $1.65 out of which 1,118,581 shares were repurchased at an average price of $1.65 for the year ended December 31, 2009 and a total of 79,300 shares were repurchased at an average purchase price of $1.64 for the year ended December 31, 2008. The Company has not repurchased any of its shares during three month period ended March 31, 2010. All the repurchased shares are retired.
 
NOTE 7- SEGMENT DATA AND GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION
 
     The Company operates in one industry segment, information technology solutions and services.
 
     The Company has four reportable geographic operating segments, which are organized and managed on a geographical basis, as follows:
  • United States (“US”) – the largest segment of the Company, with operations in the US and Puerto Rico. Includes the operations of the Company’s US subsidiary, Empower, Inc., and all corporate functions and activities. The US and corporate headquarters is located in Princeton, New Jersey;
     
  • India – includes the operations of the Company in India, including services provided on behalf of other group subsidiaries, primarily to the US. The India offices are located in Hyderabad and Bangalore, India. A majority of total revenue generated in India is derived from providing offshore development and support services to customers through the Company’s affiliated entities in other parts of the world, but predominantly with the US. This segment also covers our operations in the United Arab Emirates (“UAE”) and Saudi Arabia;
     
  • Europe – includes the operations of the Company in Denmark and the United Kingdom. The European offices are located in Milton Keynes, United Kingdom and Odense in Denmark; and
     
  • Japan – includes the operations of the Company in Japan. The office is located in Tokyo, Japan.
     The CEO has been identified as the Chief Operating Decision Maker (“CODM”) because he has final authority over resource allocation decisions and performance assessment. The CODM regularly receives certain discrete financial information about the geographical operating segments, including primarily revenue and operating income, to evaluate segment performance.
 
     Accordingly, the Company’s condensed consolidated operating results for the three month periods ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 are presented in the following geographic segments (in thousands):
 
15
 

INTELLIGROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
March 31, 2010 and 2009
 
NOTE 7- SEGMENT DATA AND GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION (Continued)
 
United
      States       India       Europe       Japan       Elimination       Total
Three months period ended March 31, 2010
Revenue 26,965 1,652 4,077 850 - 33,544
Inter-segment Revenue 2 8,628 - - (8,630 ) -
Operating Income / (Loss) 1,316 1,737 163 (142 ) 3,074
Income Tax Expense (2 ) 533 (42 ) - 489
Net Income / (Loss) 1,314 795 62 (158 ) 2,013
 
As of March 31, 2010
Property & Equipment, net 377 1,786 615 47 2,825
Total assets 49,867 36,241 8,445 1,097 (25,889 ) 69,761
 
Three months period ended March 31, 2009
Revenue 23,692 1,866 4,220 1,091 - 30,869
Inter-segment Revenue 66 7,214 - - (7,280 ) -
Operating Income / (Loss) 169 1,177 586 (122 ) 1,810
Income Tax Expense 1 345 184 - 530
Net Income / (Loss) 175 680 253 (331 ) 777
 
As of March 31, 2009
Property & Equipment, net 573 2,772 1,005 54 4,404
Total assets 44,632 32,565 7,602 1,607        (29,280 ) 57,126

NOTE 8- COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
 
     On July 5, 2000, the Company distributed SeraNova common stock to its shareholders in a transaction that was structured to be and was reported as a tax-free spin-off pursuant to Section 355 of the Internal Revenue Code (“IRC Section 355”). For distributions of stock qualifying under IRC Section 355, neither the Company nor the Company’s shareholders recognize any gain or income in connection with the transaction for US federal income tax purposes. The Company and SeraNova executed a Tax Sharing Agreement, dated January 1, 2000 (“Tax Sharing Agreement”), whereby SeraNova would indemnify the Company for any tax liabilities in the event a future transaction of SeraNova results in the spin-off is being deemed a taxable event. On October 27, 2000, SeraNova and Silverline Technologies, Inc. announced that they had entered into an agreement and plan of merger, under which Silverline Technologies, Inc. would acquire control of SeraNova in exchange for American depository shares of Silverline. Subsequently, SeraNova and Silverline Technologies, Inc. filed for Chapter 7 Bankruptcy on August 8, 2003. As a condition to the distribution, SeraNova management represented that there was no present plan, nor intent to enter into a subsequent transaction that would disturb the intended tax–free nature of the distribution.
 
16
 

INTELLIGROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
March 31, 2010 and 2009
 
NOTE 8- COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (Continued)
 
     IRC Section 355(e) provides that the Company may be required to recognize a gain equal to the excess of the fair market value of the SeraNova shares distributed over their tax basis if the distribution is part of a plan pursuant to which one or more persons acquire 50% or more of SeraNova common stock within two years of the distribution date. Should the spin-off ultimately be construed as taxable the resultant tax liability could be in the range of $55 million to $65 million and related penalties (if assessed) and interest could increase the amount by $50 million to $60 million as of March 31, 2010, depending on the facts that ultimately are established. No future benefits would inure to the Company as a result of imposition of a tax on the SeraNova distribution, and no reserve has been recorded for this potential tax. However, should such a tax liability be imposed, the Company may be able to utilize some of its existing net operating losses to mitigate this tax liability.
 
     During the three month period ended March 31, 2010, the Company’s India subsidiary received an order from service tax department amounting to INR 1,122 million (approximately $24.5 million comprising $11.7 million of service tax, $12.3 million of assessed penalty and $0.5 million of service tax credit disallowances), alleging that the services rendered by the Company during the period from June 2003 to September 2004 and March 2006 to March 2008, were taxable under the Indian Finance Act. The Company believes that the service tax department has erroneously passed this order by demanding tax on export revenues which are exempt from tax under applicable law and disallowing the valid input credits. The Company’s India subsidiary plans to appeal this service tax order. The Company has not booked a reserve for the service tax demand because it believes its tax position will most likely be validated through the appeal process.
 
   Employment Agreements
 
     As of March 31, 2010, the Company had employment agreements with certain of its executive officers, which provide for minimum payments in the event of termination for reasons other than just cause. The aggregate amount of compensation commitment in the event of termination under such agreements is approximately $1.6 million.
 
     In addition, the Company’s wholly controlled and majority owned subsidiary Intelligroup Asia Pvt. Ltd. (“IGA”) had entered into Severance Packages totaling approximately $0.6 million with certain former members of the IGA management team. Pursuant to the terms of the Agreement for Severance Package, the Severance Package is activated upon the fulfillment of certain events, including a change in management of the Company or IGA. In April 2005, following the termination of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, three members of the IGA management team, each of whom had a Severance Package, resigned. Except as set forth below, to date, the Company has not received any claim for payment of the Severance Package. In September 2005, two former members of the IGA management team sent IGA notices under Section 433 and 434 of the Indian Companies Act, 1956 for payment of such Severance Package. Such claims have not been pursued since such initial notice was served, and the Company does not believe that such severance amount is owed. In the event the Company is unsuccessful in defending against such claim for payment, the Company would owe approximately $0.6 million to such individuals.
 
NOTE 9- RESTRICTED CASH AND INVESTMENTS
 
     The various components of restricted cash and investments consist of the following:
 
As at
Mar 31, Dec 31,
      Restricted against       2010       2009
  Lien towards derivative contracts $      389 1,039
Bank guarantees for various statutory and customer related compliances   133 163
$ 522 1,202
 
Please refer to Note 10 – Financial instruments for the fair value measurement reporting of the restricted cash and investments.
 
17
 

INTELLIGROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
March 31, 2010 and 2009
 
NOTE 10- FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
 
     The Company measures certain financial assets and liabilities at fair value on a recurring basis, including derivative instruments and investments. The fair value measurements of these derivative instruments and investments were determined using the following inputs of March 31, 2010:
 
Quoted Prices in Significant Other Significant Other
Active Markets for Observable Inputs Unobservable Inputs
Identical Assets
      Total       (Level 1)       (Level 2)       (Level 3)
Assets:
Short-term Investments (Note a) $       2,818 $       - $              2,818 $       -
Bank guarantees & Term Deposits (Note b)   133 - 133 -
Investments (Note c) 2,595 - 2,595     -
Total $ 5,546 $ -   $ 5,546 $ -
 
Liabilities:      
Derivative Instruments (Note d) $ (17 ) $ - $ (17 ) $ -
Total $ (17 )   $ - $ (17 ) $ -
 
      a)       Represents term deposits and is reported under the head ‘Short Term Investments’ in the current assets on the consolidated balance sheet as of March 31, 2010. The fair value in the table is the face value of the instruments plus interest accrued up to March 31, 2010.
 
     The short-term investments and term deposits referred above are considered as trading securities. The carrying value of these investments as of March 31, 2010 approximates the fair value. Unrealized gains of $0.04 million and realized gains of $0.05 million on these investments were recorded for the three months period ended March 31, 2010. Gross proceeds from sale of such investments amounted to approximately $6.8 million for the three months period ended March 31, 2010.
 
      b)       Reported as ‘Restricted cash and investments’ on the consolidated balance sheet as of March 31, 2010. (Please refer Note 9 – Restricted cash and investments.) The fair value is the face value of the instruments plus interest accrued up to March 31, 2010
 
c) Represents non convertible debentures with an amount of $0.4 million reported under ‘Restricted cash and Investments’ and $ 2.2 million reported as ‘Other assets’ on the consolidated balance sheet as of March 31, 2010. (Please refer Note 9 – Restricted cash and investments.) The fair value is derived based on market related inputs based on market determined yield of similar instrument of similar residual maturity and option price derived based on market quotes.
 
d) Reported under current liabilities on the consolidated balance sheets. The fair value is derived by independent valuation based on analytical valuation methodology based on Black Scholes framework using forward rates and option volatilities.
 
     There have been no significant transfers in and out of Level 2 classification as given in the Table above.
 
Derivative Instruments:
 
     In the normal course of business, the Indian subsidiary of the Company actively looks to mitigate the exposure of foreign currency market risk, by entering into various derivative instruments, authorized under Company policies, with counterparties that are highly rated financial institutions. The primary exchange rate exposure of the Indian subsidiary is to the US Dollar.
 
18
 

INTELLIGROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
March 31, 2010 and 2009
 
NOTE 10- FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS (Continued)
 
     The Company uses derivative instruments consisting of foreign currency exchange option and forward contracts not designated as hedging instruments under ASC 815-10 to economically hedge exposure of foreign currency market risk. Changes in the fair value of these instruments are recognized in the consolidated statement of operations and are included in foreign exchange gain/ (loss). The Company had outstanding foreign exchange contracts totaling $4.25 million as of March 31, 2010 and $8.00 million as of December 31, 2009. The Company did not enter into any new foreign currency forward contracts during the three months period ended March 31, 2010.
 
     At March 31, 2010, summary information about the foreign exchange options is as follows:
 
Option Contracts Range forward Contracts
Notional Amount $2 million $2.25 million
Rates INR 43.45 INR 46.25 to 48.12
Effective date 5/18/2007 12/09/2009,
Maturity Dates 4/28/2010 to 05/26/10 4/28/2010 to 12/29/10
Fair Value $ (0.07) million $ 0.05 million

     The fair values of derivative instruments in the condensed consolidated balance sheet as of March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009 are as follows:
 
As at
Derivative Instruments not designated as       Balance Sheet Location       Mar 31,       Dec 31,
hedging instrument under ASC 815: 2010 2009
Fair value of foreign exchange contracts   Liability on derivative instruments   $ (17 )   (389 )
 
Fair Value Total   $      (17 )          (389 )
 
     The effect of derivative instruments on the condensed consolidated statement of operations for the three month periods ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 is as follows:
 
Amount of gain/ (loss) recognized.
 
Derivative Instruments not designated as Location of gain / (loss) recognized on Three months period
hedging instrument under ASC 815:   the Income Statement ended March 31,
              2010       2009
Foreign Exchange Contracts   Foreign currency transaction gain / (loss), net   $ 209 (973 )
 
Total   $      209          (973 )
 
     Please also refer Note 12 below for the various components of foreign currency transaction gain / (loss) as reported on the condensed consolidated statement of operations and comprehensive income for the three month periods ending March 31, 2010 and 2009.
 
19
 

INTELLIGROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
March 31, 2010 and 2009
 
NOTE 11- EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS
 
     The Gratuity Plan provides a lump sum payment to vested employees on retirement or on termination of employment in an amount based on the respective employee’s salary and years of employment with the Company. Liabilities with regard to the Gratuity Plan are determined by actuarial valuation. Current service costs for the Gratuity Plan are accrued in the year to which they relate.
 
     Net Gratuity Plan cost includes the following components:
 
Three Months
    Period Ended March
      2010       2009
Service Cost $ 28 27
  Interest Cost   12 9
Actuarial (Gain) / Loss (2 ) (20 )
Expected Return on Assets   (5 ) (3 )
Net Gratuity Cost $         33          13
 
NOTE 12- FOREIGN CURRENCY TRANSACTION GAIN/(LOSS), NET
 
     Foreign currency transaction gain / (loss) comprises of two components – i) ASC 830 (previously FAS 52) re-measurement gains or losses on the accounts receivable denominated in other than the functional currency and the mark to market gains or losses of the derivative instruments as follows.
 
Three Months
Period Ended March 31,
      2010       2009
Foreign currency translation/ realization gain /(loss) $ (991 )   358
Derivative unrealized gain / (loss) 160   (692 )
Derivative realized gain / (loss)     49 (281 )
Total foreign currency transaction gain / (loss) $        (782 )         (615 )
 
NOTE 13- OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
 
     The changes in Other Comprehensive Income are mainly due to the foreign currency translation adjustments of international subsidiaries.
 
     For the three months period ended March 31, 2010, the Company recorded other comprehensive gain due to translation adjustment of approximately $1.0 million on account of currency fluctuations in Asia and Europe. Other comprehensive loss of approximately $1.0 million was recorded for the three months period ended March 31, 2009.
 
NOTE 14- SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
 
     As per ASC 855, the Company is required to disclose significant changes in estimates as on the balance sheet date and to evaluate subsequent events that occurred after the balance sheet date but before the financial statements were issued. The Company has concluded that no events or transactions have occurred which would require adjustments or disclosures in the Company’s financial statements.
 
20
 

INTELLIGROUP, INC.
 
Item 2 Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
 
     The following discussion of our results of operations and financial condition should be read in conjunction with the Financial Statements and Notes included in Part I. “Financial Information”. This report contains forward looking statements made pursuant to the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 under Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
 
     Forward-looking statements include statements with respect to our beliefs, plans, objectives, goals, expectations, anticipations, assumptions, estimates, intentions, and future performance, and involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors, which may be beyond our control, and which may cause our actual results, performance or achievements to be materially different from future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements.
 
     All statements other than statements of historical fact are statements that could be forward-looking statements. You can identify these forward-looking statements through our use of words such as “may,” “will,” “can” “anticipate,” “assume,” “should,” “indicate,” “would,” “believe,” “contemplate,” “expect,” “seek,” “estimate,” “continue,” “plan,” “point to,” “project,” “predict,” “could,” “intend,” “target,” “potential,” and other similar words and expressions of the future.
 
Forward-looking statements may not be realized due to a variety of factors, including, without limitation:
  • the impact of the general economic conditions which has and may continue to impact demand for our services and strength of the global economic recovery;
     
  • the inability to generate new sales and maintain profitability;
     
  • the inability to attract and retain a sufficient number of highly skilled technical employees, particularly senior level technical personnel and project managers;
     
  • changes in the political, regulatory, and economic conditions in India, which is where a substantial portion of our operations are located;
     
  • impact of the economic conditions that are unique to the particular industry to which we provide services;
     
  • effects of competition in the information technology services industry where there is a very high level of competition for employees and customers;
     
  • future legislation impacting the off shore business model and increased anti-off-shoring sentiment in the United States and isdictions could significantly affect the demand for our services and our customer delivery model.
     
  • inability to maintain access to external funding;
     
  • currency fluctuations may negatively impact our financial results;
     
  • inability to maintain effective internal control over financial reporting or to remediate any weaknesses that may arise in the future;
     
  • claims for damages by third parties, including liability claims arising from negligent acts, errors, mistakes or omission in rendering our IT professional services;
     
  • our dependence on a limited number of large customers;
     
  • a systems failure or disruption in telecommunications could disrupt our business and result in lost customers and negative publicity;
     
  • dependence on a limited number of software partners;
     
  • disruption to our operations, including disruptions caused by geopolitical conditions in India;
     
  • the effects of volatility and lack of liquidity in our common stock;
     
  • our inability to protect our intellectual property;
     
  • third party claims that our services infringe on their intellectual property rights;
21
 

INTELLIGROUP, INC.
 
Item 2 Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (Continued)
  • we may be subject to increased tax liabilities, including if the spin-off in 2000 of our former subsidiary, SeraNova, is determined to be taxable. We could be liable in the range of $55 million to $65 million and related penalties (if assessed) and interest could increase the amount by $50 million to $60 million. In July 2000, we completed the tax-free spin-off of SeraNova, our former subsidiary. In March 2001, SeraNova and Silverline Technologies Limited (“Silverline”) consummated the acquisition of SeraNova by Silverline. Had the acquisition of SeraNova by Silverline been contemplated at the time of the spin-off, the spin-off would have been a taxable transaction. Based upon the information available to us, we believe that such acquisition was not contemplated at the time of the spin-off of SeraNova by Intelligroup, and accordingly should not impact the tax-free nature of the spin-off. However, if it were determined that the spin-off was taxable, Intelligroup may have to bear the liability to pay such tax liability, which would be material. Please refer to Note 9 to the financial statements on in our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009;
     
  • the Company’s India subsidiary received an order from Service tax department during the three months period ended March 31, 2010, amounting to INR 1,122 million (approximately $24.5 million comprising $11.7 million of service tax, $12.3 million of assessed penalty and $0.5 million of service tax credit disallowances), alleging that the services rendered by the Company during the period from June 2003 to September 2004 and March 2006 to March 2008, were taxable under the Finance Act. The Company believes that the department has erroneously passed this order by demanding tax on export revenues which are exempt from tax under law and disallowing the valid input credits. The Company plans to appeal this service tax order; and
     
  • the factors listed under “Item 1A. Risk Factors” in our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009.
     All forward-looking statements are expressly qualified in their entirety by this cautionary notice. You are cautioned not to place undue reliance on any forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date of this report. We have no obligation, and expressly disclaim any obligation, to update, revise or correct any of the forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. We have expressed our expectations, beliefs and projections in good faith and we believe they have a reasonable basis. However, we cannot assure you that our expectations, beliefs or projections will result or be achieved or accomplished.
 
Overview
 
     The Company plans, consults, builds, supports and manages enterprise resource planning (“ERP”) solutions based on SAP, Oracle, PeopleSoft and Microsoft applications and technology platforms and also provide services around business intelligence, ERP Infrastructure Management, E-Business ERP Integration, ERP Testing, business process outsourcing or “BPO” and knowledge process outsourcing or “KPO”.
 
     The Company helps its customers align and optimize their technology platforms, primarily their ERP systems, with their businesses. While historically ERP providers had focused on providing solutions for large market companies with revenues of over $5 billion such systems have increasingly become mission critical for companies with revenues of between $500 million and $5 billion (“Mid-Tier Market”), as these systems are used to help them drive greater revenue and productivity as well as to better manage and control costs.
 
     The Company has worked to position itself as the “go-to” partner for companies looking for an ERP and extended ERP solutions partner particularly for Mid-Tier Market and that positioning provides it with an important competitive edge. This positioning is reflected in the fact that over 90% of our business is generated from ERP-driven projects.
 
     In this Section, we will discuss the following: (i) key factors in evaluating the Company’s financial performance; (ii) application of critical accounting principles, which explains the accounting principles necessary to understand how the Company records its financial information; (iii) results of operations - consolidated, in which the Company’s consolidated results are compared period to period to recognize trends; (iv) results of operations by business segment, which allows the Company to compare the results of its different business units; (v) liquidity and capital resources; (vi) recent accounting pronouncements, which identifies new accounting literature that may have an impact on the Company’s future results and (vii) a discussion of our business outlook.
 
22
 

INTELLIGROUP, INC.
 
Item 2 Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (Continued)
 
Key Factors in Evaluating the Company’s Financial Performance
 
     Management believes the following factors should be considered when evaluating the Company’s reported financial information contained in Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
 
Revenue
 
     The majority of the Company’s revenue is derived from professional services rendered to customers. Revenue is typically recognized as services are performed. The Company’s services range from providing customers with a single consultant to multi-personnel full-scale projects. Although the Company has contracts with many of its customers to provide its services, in general, such contracts are terminable upon relatively short notice, typically not more than 30 days. There can be no assurance that the Company’s customers will continue to enter into contracts with the Company or that existing contracts will not be terminated. The Company provides its services either directly to end-user organizations, or as a member of a consulting team assembled by another IT consulting firm. Where contractual provisions permit, customers also are billed for reimbursement of expenses incurred by the Company on the customers’ behalf.
 
Fixed Price Projects
 
     The Company has provided services on certain projects in which it, at the request of the clients, offers a fixed price for its services. For the three months period ended March 31, 2010, revenue derived from projects under fixed-time and fixed price service contracts represented approximately 32% and 16%, respectively, of the Company’s total revenue. For the three months period ended March 31, 2009, revenue derived from projects under fixed-time and fixed price service contracts represented approximately 38% and 9%, respectively, of the Company’s total revenue. No single fixed price project was material to the Company’s business during the three months period ended March 31, 2010 and 2009. The Company believes that, as it pursues its strategy of providing application management services to customers, it will continue to offer fixed price projects. The Company believes that there are certain risks related to fixed price arrangements and thus prices such arrangements to reflect the associated risk. There can be no assurance that the Company will be able to complete such projects within the fixed price timeframes. The failure to perform within such fixed price contracts, if entered into, could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition and results of operations.
 
Customer Concentration
 
     The Company has derived and believes that it will continue to derive a significant portion of its revenue from a limited number of customers and projects. For the three month periods ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, the Company’s ten largest customers accounted for in the aggregate approximately 39% and 36% of its revenue, respectively. During the three month periods ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, no single customer accounted for 10% or more of revenues. There can be no assurance that such customers will continue to engage the Company in the future at current levels of retention, if at all.
 
Software Partners
 
     For the three month periods ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, the Company derived the following percentages of total revenue from projects in which the Company implemented, extended, maintained, managed or supported software developed by SAP and Oracle.
 
Percentage of Revenues
Three Months
  Period Ended March 31,
        2010       2009
      SAP 69%   77%
Oracle 17%   14%
e-Business 5%   5%
Others 9%   4%
Total 100%   100%

23
 

INTELLIGROUP, INC.
 
Item 2 Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (Continued)
 
Markets
 
     The Company currently serves the United States market with its headquarters in Princeton, New Jersey, and branch offices in Atlanta, Georgia, Naperville, Illinois and Milpitas, California. The Company also maintains local offices to serve the markets in India, the United Kingdom, Denmark, Japan, Canada and the United Arab Emirates.
 
Expenses
 
     The Company’s most significant cost is project personnel expenses, which consist of consultant salaries, payroll taxes, benefits and subcontractor fees. Thus, the Company’s financial performance is based primarily upon billing margin (billable hourly rate less the cost to the Company of a consultant on an hourly basis) and personnel utilization rates (billable hours divided by paid hours).
 
Application of Critical Accounting Policies
 
     The preparation of the Company’s consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. The Company’s estimates, judgments and assumptions are continually evaluated based on available information and experience. Because of the use of estimates inherent in the financial reporting process, actual results could differ from those estimates.
 
     Certain of the Company’s accounting policies require higher degrees of judgment than others in their application. These include revenue recognition and allowance for doubtful accounts, impairments and estimation of useful lives of long-term assets, income tax recognition of current and deferred tax items, assumptions used in valuing stock-based compensation arrangements and fair value measurements, and accruals for contingencies.
 
     For a description of our critical accounting policies and estimates, refer the discussion in Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Application of Critical Accounting Policies in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009.
 
24
 

INTELLIGROUP, INC.
 
Item 2 Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (Continued)
 
Results of Operations – Consolidated – Three months period ended March 31, 2010 compared to three months period ended March 31, 2009.
 
     The following table sets forth for the periods indicated certain financial data expressed as a percentage of total revenue:
 
Percentage of Revenue
Three month period ended March 31,
      2010         2009
       Revenue
 100.0 % 100.0 %
       Cost of Revenues
 68.2 68.8
              Gross Profit
 31.8 31.2
 
       Selling general and administrative expenses
 21.0 23.5
       Depreciation and amortization
 1.6 1.8
              Total operating expenses
 22.6 25.3
              Operating Income
 9.2 5.9
 
Interest income 0.2 0.1
Interest expense (0.1 ) 0.0
Foreign currency transaction gain (loss), net (2.3 ) (2.0 )  
Other income, net   0.5   0.3
       Income before income tax provision
 7.5 4.3
       Income Tax
 1.5   1.7  
       Net income
 6.0 % 2.6 %

Three months period ended March 31, 2010 compared to three months period ended March 31, 2009.
 
     Revenue: Revenue has increased by 8.7% for the three months period ended March 31, 2010 as compared to the three months period ended March 31, 2009. The three month period ended March 31, 2009 was significantly impacted by global economic crisis. The improvement in revenue is primarily a result of the increased demand for our IT consulting services as the global economy continues to recover. The increased volume of services sold was partially offset by decreases in our average bill rates. Competitive pressures have resulted in downward pressure on pricing. Our on site rates reduced by 3% from an average rate of $102 during the three months period ended March 31, 2009 to an average rate of $99 during the three months period ended March 31, 2010. Off shore rates are at same level at an average rate of $21 during the three month periods ended March 31, 2010 and 2009.
 
     Cost of revenue and gross profit: The cost of revenue has increased by 7.7% from $21.2 million for the three months period ended March 31, 2009 to $22.9 million for the three months period ended March 31, 2010. The increase was attributable to increase in sub-contractors cost by 6% due to increase in the headcount of sub-contractors, increase in project related expenses by 0.7% due to increase in volume of services sold and also increase by 3% due to fluctuations in the functional currencies of our international subsidiaries. The above increases in costs were offset by the decrease in payroll costs by 2% due to decrease in the headcount and the related compensation costs. The gross profit has increased by 10.8% from $9.6 million for the three months period ended March 31, 2009 to $10.7 million for the three months period ended March 31, 2010. The increase in gross profit was a result of the increase in the revenues partially offset by the increase in cost during the three months period ended March 31, 2010. Gross margin has increased from 31.2% for the three months period ended March 31, 2009 to 31.8% for the three months period ended March 31, 2010. The increase in gross margin was primarily due to improvement in utilization rate by 8%. The cost of revenue has increased by 7.7% as opposed to increase in revenue by 8.7% for the three months ended March 31, 2010 as compared to three months ended March 31, 2009, thereby contributing to an increase in gross margin.
 
25
 

INTELLIGROUP, INC.
 
Item 2 Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (Continued)
 
     Selling, general and administrative expenses: Selling, general and administrative expenses primarily consist of salaries and related benefits for sales and general administrative personnel, facilities costs, related travel and entertainment and professional fees. Selling, general and administrative expenses have decreased by 3.1% from $7.3 million for the three months period ended March 31, 2009 to $7.0 million for the three months period ended March 31, 2010. The decrease in selling, general and administrative expenses was mainly due to (i) reduction in payroll expenses and sales commission by 6.2% on account of reduction in head count; (ii) fluctuations in the functional currencies of the subsidiaries by 2.8% which was partially offset by a 0.3% increase in other advertising, insurance and general expenses.
 
     Depreciation and amortization expenses: The Company recorded depreciation and amortization expenses of $0.6 million for the three month periods ended March 31, 2010 and 2009.
 
     Interest Expense: For the three month periods ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, the Company recorded $0.02 million towards interest expense.
 
     Foreign Currency gain (loss): For the three months period ended March 31, 2010, the Company recorded foreign currency transaction losses of approximately $0.8 million, as compared to transaction losses of approximately $0.6 million recorded for the three months period ended March 31, 2009. The loss recorded during the three months period ended March 31, 2009 was due to marked to market valuation of the outstanding derivative instruments consequent to significant fluctuations in Indian Rupee (“INR”) and US Dollar (“USD”). The loss recorded during the three months period ended March 31, 2010 was primarily due to strengthening of INR against USD. We had outstanding foreign exchange contracts totaling $4.25 million as of March 31, 2010 and $22.6 million as of March 31, 2009.
 
     Interest and Other Income: Interest and other income was approximately $0.2 million for the three months period ended March 31, 2010 as compared to $0.1 million for the three months period ended March 31, 2009. The increase is mainly due to accrued interest on short term investments.
 
     Income tax provision: The Company recorded an income tax provision of $0.5 million on a pretax income of $2.5 million for the three months period ended March 31, 2010 as compared to an income tax provision of $0.5 million on a pretax income of $1.3 million for the three months period ended March 31, 2009. The effective tax rate has decreased to 19.5% during the three months period ended March 31, 2010 from 40.6% during the three months period ended March 31, 2009 primarily due to changes in the geographic distribution of the income and changes in non taxable income. The difference between the income tax rates for the 2010 and 2009 periods and the statutory rate is primarily due to the existence of carried forward net operating losses in the U.S. locations on which a full valuation allowance has been recorded and earnings taxed in countries that have rates lower than the United States.
 
Results of Operations by Business Segment
 
     The Company operates in one industry segment, information technology solutions and services.
 
     The Company has four reportable geographic operating segments, which are organized and managed on a geographical basis, as follows:
 
26
 

INTELLIGROUP, INC.
 
Item 2 Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (Continued)
  • United States (“US”) – the largest segment of the Company, with operations in the US and Puerto Rico. Includes the operations of the Company’s US subsidiary, Empower, Inc., and all corporate functions and activities. The US and corporate headquarters is located in Princeton, New Jersey;
     
  • India – includes the operations of the Company in India, including services provided on behalf of other group subsidiaries, primarily to the US. The India offices are located in Hyderabad and Bangalore, India. A majority of the total revenue generated in India is derived from providing off shore development and support services to customers through the Company’s affiliated entities in other parts of the world, but predominantly with the United States. This segment also covers our operations in the UAE and Saudi Arabia;
     
  • Europe – includes the operations of the Company in Denmark and the United Kingdom. The European offices are located in Milton Keynes, United Kingdom; and Odense in Denmark; and
     
  • Japan – includes the operations of the Company in Japan. The office is located in Tokyo, Japan.
     The revenues are attributed to each segment on the basis of the location of the entity which contracts with the customer and on the basis of the inter-company agreements between the affiliated entities. The CEO has been identified as the Chief Operating Decision Maker (“CODM”) because he has final authority over resource allocation decisions and performance assessment. The CODM regularly receives certain discrete financial information about the geographical operating segments, including primarily revenue and operating income, to evaluate segment performance.
 
Three months period ended March 31, 2010 compared to three months period ended March 31, 2009.
 
     The following discussion compares the segment results of operations for the three month periods ended March 31, 2010 and 2009.
 
     Revenue and Operating Income. The following table displays revenues and operating income by reportable segment (in thousands).
 
Three months period ended Mar 31,
2010 2009 Change in
% of Operating % of Operating Operating
Revenues      Total      Income      Revenues      Total      Income      Revenues      Income
United States $       26,967 80 % $       1,316 $       23,758 77 % $       169 $       3,209 $       1,147
India 10,280 31 %     1,737 9,080   29 % 1,177 1,200   560
Europe 4,077   12 % 163     4,220   14 % 586     (143 )   (423 )
Japan   850   3 % (142 ) 1,091 4 % (122 ) (241 ) (20 )
Inter-segment eliminations (8,630 ) -26 %   (7,280 ) -24 %   (1,350 )    
Total $ 33,544 100 % $ 3,074   $ 30,869 100 % $ 1,810 $ 2,675 $ 1,264
 
27
 

INTELLIGROUP, INC.
 
Item 2 Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (Continued)
 
     US revenue has increased by 13.5% or $3.2 million, from $23.8 million for the three month period ended March 31, 2009 to $27.0 million for the three months period ended March 31, 2010. The increase in revenue was primarily due to a gradual improvement in IT spending over the last two quarters and continued improvement in the overall market for IT services as the global economy recovers. The operating income for US segment increased by $1.1 million from $0.2 million for the three months period ended March 31, 2009 to $1.3 million for the three months period ended March 31, 2010, primarily due to increase in revenues by 13.7% offset by an increase in project related and travel costs by 12%, marketing and administrative expenses by 13% and payroll and subcontracting costs by 1%.
 
     India revenue has increased by 13.2% or $1.2 million from $9.1million for the three month period ended March 31, 2009 to $10.3 million for the three month period ended March 31, 2010. The increase in revenue is primarily driven by US market showing a gradual improvement in IT spending over the last two quarters and a consequent increase in demand for offshore services. Off shore revenues attributable to Company’s other international segments increased by 19.6% while revenues from local geographic markets decreased by 11% as compared to the three months period ended March 31, 2010. Our Off shore rates are at same level at an average rate of $21 during the three months period ended March 31, 2010 and 2009. Operating income for the India segment has increased by 47.6% from $1.2 million for the three months ended March 31, 2009 to $1.7 million for the three months period ended March 31, 2010 primarily due to increase in revenues by 13.2%, offset by an increase in payroll and subcontracting costs by 9%, project related and travel costs by 12% and marketing and administrative expenses by 2%.
 
     Europe revenue has decreased marginally by 3.4% or $0.1 million, from $4.2 million for the three months period ended March 31, 2009 to $4.1 million for the three months period ended March 31, 2010. Operating income for UK segment decreased by 72.2% from $0.6 million for the three months period ended March 31, 2009 to $0.2 million for the three months period ended March 31, 2010. The decrease in operating income was due to a decrease in revenues by 3.4%, increase in payroll and subcontracting expenses by 38%, project related and travel costs by 13% and offset by decrease in marketing and administrative expenses by 7%.
 
     Japan revenue decreased by 22.1% or 0.2 million, from $1.1 million for the three months period ended March 31, 2009 to $0.9 million for the three months period ended March 31, 2010. The decrease is primarily due to closure of a project in mid 2009. Japan reported operating loss at same level of $0.1 million during the three month periods ended March 31, 2010 and 2009.
 
Liquidity and Capital Resources
 
Cash Position and Cash Flows
 
     We had cash and cash equivalents of $23.2 million as at March 31, 2010 as compared to $20.8 million as at December 31, 2009. We had a working capital of $39.6 million at March 31, 2010 and $36.1 million as at December 31, 2009.
 
     Cash generated from operating activities was $2.5 million for the three months period ended March 31, 2010, resulting primarily from the net income of $2.0 million for the period. Cash generated from operating activities was $6.1 million for the three months period ended March 31 2009, resulting primarily from the net income of $0.8 million for the period increased by $5.6 million due to realization of accounts receivable and unbilled services balances.
 
28
 

INTELLIGROUP, INC.
 
Item 2 Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (Continued)
 
     The Company invested $0.5 million in net purchase of computer equipment, internal-use computer software and office furniture, fixtures and leasehold improvements for the three months period ended March 31, 2010, compared to $0.1 million for the three months period ended March 31, 2009.
 
     Cash provided in financing activities was $0.2 million during the three months period ended March 31, 2010 as the Company received cash proceeds due to exercise of stock options by employees. Cash used in financing activities was $1.1 million during the three months period ended March 31, 2009 as the Company repurchased stock amounting to $0.9 million during this period.
 
Credit Facility
 
     On May 22, 2008, the Company entered into a revolving credit loan and security agreement (“Credit Agreement”) with HSBC Bank, (the “Bank”). The Credit Agreement is comprised of a three year revolving line of credit pursuant to which the Company can borrow up to $10 million at the Bank’s Base Rate (as defined in the Credit Agreement) of 3.25% as of March 31, 2010, minus 0.85% percent. The credit facility is collateralized by substantially all of the assets of the United States based operations and all subsidiary stock (not to exceed 65% of the Equity Interests of any Foreign Subsidiary). The maximum borrowing availability under the Credit Agreement is based upon a percentage of eligible billed and unbilled accounts receivable. The Credit Agreement provides for certain financial covenants that shall only be tested as of the end of any fiscal quarter.
 
     The Company was in compliance with the applicable financial covenants of the Credit Agreement as of March 31, 2010.
 
     A standby letter of credit of $0.1million has been issued by and drawn upon HSBC banking corporation in favor of a landlord as security deposit. This letter of credit is secured by a lien on the assets of the company. The Company estimates undrawn availability under the Credit Facility to be $9.9 million as of March 31, 2010.
 
     The Company is prohibited from paying dividends under the terms of the Credit Agreement.
 
Cash to Fund Operating Activities
 
     The Company relies on the cash generated by operating activities, cash on hand and the financing available under its credit facility to fund ongoing operations. The Company’s credit facility with the Bank represents its sole source of external financing for ongoing business operations. The Company’s operating plan depends on its cash generated by operating activities and continued borrowing availability under this credit facility or securing alternate sources of financing. The Company must comply with certain covenants or secure from the Bank waivers of any default on such covenants to maintain its line of credit with the Bank. There can be no assurances that the Company will be able to maintain compliance with the applicable financial covenants under its credit agreement or obtain waivers of any defaults.
 
     The Company’s 2010 operating plan contains assumptions regarding revenue and expenses. The achievement of the operating plan depends heavily on the timing of work performed by the Company on existing projects and the ability of the Company to gain and perform work on new projects. Project cancellations, delays in the timing of work performed by the Company on existing projects or the inability of the Company to gain and perform work on new projects, or ability to timely collect cash from its customers could have an adverse impact on the Company’s ability to execute its operating plan and maintain adequate cash flow. In the event actual results do not meet the operating plan, management believes it could execute contingency plans to mitigate such effects. Such plans include reductions in capital expenditures and operating costs, and/or seeking additional financing. At March 31, 2010, we had cash and cash equivalents and short-term investments of $26.1 million and working capital of approximately $39.6 million. Accordingly, we do not anticipate any near-term liquidity issues. Management believes that the Company’s cash on hand and cash generated by operations and borrowings under its credit facility will be sufficient to fund the Company’s current and planned operations through at least the next twelve months.
 
29
 

INTELLIGROUP, INC.
 
Item 2 Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (Continued)
 
Contractual Obligations and Other Commercial Commitments
 
     There have been no material changes to the contractual obligations and other commercial commitments previously disclosed in our annual report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2009.
 
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
 
     In August 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2009-05, “Measuring Liabilities at Fair Value” (“ASU 2009-05”). The amendments in this ASU apply to all entities that measure liabilities at fair value and provide clarification that in circumstances, in which a quoted price in an active market for the identical liability is not available, an entity is required to measure fair value using one or more techniques laid out in this ASU. The guidance provided in this ASU is effective for the first reporting period (including reporting periods) beginning after issuance. The implementation of this standard did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements
 
     In October 2009, the FASB issued ASU 2009-13, “Multiple-Deliverable Revenue Arrangements”, (amendments to FASB ASC Topic 605, Revenue Recognition) (“ASU 2009-13”). In September 2009, the FASB ratified Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2009-13 (ASU 2009-13) (previously Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) Issue No. 08-1, Revenue Arrangements with Multiple Deliverables (EITF 08-1)). ASU 2009-13 superseded EITF 00-21 and addresses criteria for separating the consideration in multiple-element arrangements. ASU 2009-13 will require companies to allocate the overall consideration to each deliverable by using a best estimate of the selling price of individual deliverables in the arrangement in the absence of vendor-specific objective evidence or other third-party evidence of the selling price. ASU 2009-13 will be effective prospectively for revenue arrangements entered into or materially modified in fiscal years beginning on or after June 15, 2010 and early adoption will be permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the potential impact, if any, of the adoption of ASU 2009-13 on its consolidated results of operations and financial condition and whether it will adopt the standard early. ASU 2009-13 will become effective for the Company with its fiscal year beginning January 1, 2011.
 
     In January 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-06, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures”, (amendments to FASB ASC Topic 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures) (“ASU 2010-06”). ASU 2010-06 requires entities to disclose separately the amounts of significant transfers in and out of Level 1 and Level 2 fair value measurements along with the reasons for such transfers. Entities should also present separate information about purchases, sales, issuances and settlement activity in Level 3 fair value measurements. The ASU 2010-06 requires entities to provide fair value measurement disclosures for each class of assets and liabilities and disclosures about inputs and valuation techniques. The new disclosures and clarifications of existing disclosures are effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2009 except for the disclosures pertaining to Level 3 fair value measurements. Those disclosures are effective for interim and fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2010. This ASU 2010-06 is effective for the Company with its interim period beginning January 1, 2010. The Company adopted the disclosure requirements of the standard effective January 1, 2010 to the extent applicable. The implementation of this standard did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
 
30
 

INTELLIGROUP, INC.
 
Item 2 Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (Continued)
 
Business Outlook
 
     Our business and financial condition depend on the health of the general economy, as well as the demand for information technology services, particularly in the United States as we derive a significant portion of our revenue from customers located in the United States. Our revenue and profits are driven by demand for our services. After extremely challenging global economic conditions at the end of 2008 and through the first half of 2009, we see a modest rebound in IT spending which gives opportunities for continued sequential growth for the balance of the year. While the change provides a positive outlook for the business and the demand is improving, in the near term it is creating a more competitive pricing environment for both projects as well as employee compensation.
 
     While we continued to see a gradual improvement in IT spending trends during the first quarter, we do not yet see sufficient reason to accelerate investment in sales and marketing. We believe that the market for IT services has stabilized across many industry sectors in which we work with the exception of our customers and prospects in the consumer products and manufacturing sectors continued to exhibit challenged demand on a sequential basis.
 
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk.
 
     There have been no material changes to the information on quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk provided in our annual report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2009.
 
Item 4. Controls and Procedures.
 
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
 
     We are responsible for maintaining disclosure controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our Exchange Act reports is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and regulations, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, as appropriate, to allow for timely decisions regarding required disclosures. Our management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act) as of the end of the period covered by this report. In designing and evaluating our disclosure controls and procedures, management recognized that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving their objectives and management necessarily is required to apply its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures and implementing controls and procedures based upon the application of management’s judgment. Based on such evaluation, our principal executive officer and principal financial officer have concluded that, as of March 31, 2010, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective at reasonable assurance level as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act.
 
Changes in Internal Controls
 
     There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the three months period ended March 31, 2010 that materially affected or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
 
31
 

INTELLIGROUP, INC.
 
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
 
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
 
     There is no pending litigation to which the Company is a party or to which any of its property is subject that would have a material impact on its consolidated financial condition, results of operations or cash flows in the event we were unsuccessful in such litigation. However, the Company cannot predict with certainty the outcome of any litigation or the potential for future litigation and any such matters could adversely affect its financial condition, results of operations, cash flows and business.
 
Item 1a. Risk Factors
 
     There have been no material changes to our risk factors previously disclosed in our annual report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2009.
 
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
 
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities
 
     There are no matters to report subject to this Item for the three months period ended March 31, 2010.
 
Item 4. (Removed and Reserved)
 
Item 5. Other Information
 
     There are no matters to report subject to this Item for the period ended March 31, 2010.
 
Item 6. Exhibits
 
     See exhibit index hereto, which is incorporated by reference herein.
 
32
 

INTELLIGROUP, INC.
 
EXHIBIT INDEX
 
Exhibit No.        Description of Exhibit  
2   Agreement and Plan of Merger of the Company and its wholly owned subsidiary Oxford Systems Inc. dated December 2, 1996 (Incorporated by reference to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 1996.)
 
3.1     Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation dated June 8, 2007.
 
3.2   Amended and Restated Bylaws. (Incorporated by reference to the Company's Registration Statement on Form SB-2 (Registration Statement No. 333-5981) declared effective on September 26, 1996.)
 
4.1   Shareholder Protection Rights Agreement dated as of November 6, 1998, between the Company and American Stock Transfer & Trust Company which includes (I) the Form of Rights Certificate and (ii) the Certificate of Amendment to the Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Intelligroup, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit No. 4.1 of the Company's Report on Form 8-K dated November 9, 1998, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 9, 1998.)
 
4.2   Amendment dated September 29, 2004 to the Shareholder Protection Rights Agreement dated November 6, 2004. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit No. 4.1 of the Company’s Report on Form 8-K dated September 29, 2004, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on October 5, 2004.)
 
31.1 † Certifications of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a), as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 
31.2 † Certifications of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a), as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 
32.1 † Certifications of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 
32.2 † Certifications of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

†       Filed herewith. All other exhibits previously filed.
 
33
 

SIGNATURES
 
     Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned; thereunto duly authorized this 17th day of May 2010.
 
  INTELLIGROUP, INC.
 
Date: May 17, 2010 By:       /s/ Vikram Gulati
   
    Vikram Gulati
    Chief Executive Officer
 
Date: May 17, 2010 By: /s/ Alok Bajpai
 
    Alok Bajpai
    Chief Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer.

34
 
 EX-31.1 2 exhibit31-1.htm CERTIFICATIONS OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-14(A) exhibit31-1.htm
Exhibit 31.1
 
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO RULE 13a-14(a) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT
 
I Vikram Gulati certify that:
 
1.       I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Intelligroup, Inc.;
 
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
 
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
 
4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15 (f) for the registrant and we have:
 
  a.       designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
 
  b. designed such internal control over financial reporting or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of our financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principals;
 
  c. evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
 
  d. disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth quarter in case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;
 
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
 
  a. all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process summarize and report financial information; and
 
  b. any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting.

DATE: May 17, 2010 By:       /s/ Vikram Gulati
 
    Vikram Gulati
    Chief Executive Officer
 
 EX-31.2 3 exhibit31-2.htm CERTIFICATIONS OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-14(A) exhibit31-2.htm
Exhibit 31.2
 
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO RULE 13a-14(a) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT
 
I Alok Bajpai certify that:
 
1.       I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Intelligroup, Inc.;
 
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
 
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
 
4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15 (f) for the registrant and we have:
 
  a.       designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
 
  b. designed such internal control over financial reporting or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of our financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principals;
 
  c. evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
 
  d. disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth quarter in case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;
 
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
 
  a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process summarize and report financial information; and
 
  b. any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting.

DATE: May 17, 2010 By:       /s/ Alok Bajpai
 
    Alok Bajpai
    Chief Financial Officer
 
 EX-32.1 4 exhibit32-1.htm CERTIFICATIONS OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 exhibit32-1.htm
Exhibit 32.1
 
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Intelligroup, Inc, (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Vikram Gulati, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:
 
(1)       The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”); and
 
(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
DATE: May 17, 2010 By:       /s/ Vikram Gulati
 
    Vikram Gulati
    Chief Executive Officer
 
 EX-32.2 5 exhibit32-2.htm CERTIFICATIONS OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 exhibit32-2.htm
Exhibit 32.2
 
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Intelligroup, Inc, (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Alok Bajpai, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:
 
(1)       The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”); and
 
(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

DATE: May 17, 2010 By:       /s/ Alok Bajpai
 
    Alok Bajpai
    Chief Financial Officer
 
 -----END PRIVACY-ENHANCED MESSAGE-----