Form 10-Q

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q


þ		QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2009


o		TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from to

Commission File Number: 1-13007

CARVER BANCORP, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)


*Delaware* (State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization)		*13-3904174* (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

*75 West 125th Street, New York, New York* (Address of Principal Executive Offices)		*10027* (Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (718) 230-2900

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

þ Yes o No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).

o Yes o No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

o Large accelerated filer

o Accelerated filer

o Non-accelerated filer
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

þ Smaller reporting company

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). o Yes þ No

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.


Common Stock, par value $0.01		2,474,719

Class		Outstanding at November 13, 2009

CARVER BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
(In thousands, except per share data)


	September 30,			March 31,
	2009			2009
	(unaudited)
ASSETS
Cash and cash equivalents:
Cash and due from banks	$	13,574		$	8,251
Money market investments		852			5,090

Total cash and cash equivalents		14,426			13,341
Investment securities:
Available-for-sale, at fair value		52,120			59,973
Held-to-maturity, at amortized cost (fair value of $13,012 and $14,528 at September 30, 2009 and March 31, 2009, respectively)		12,803			14,808

Total securities		64,923			74,781

Loans held-for-sale		19,557			21,105

Loans receivable:
Real estate mortgage loans		594,917			581,987
Commercial business loans		70,162			57,398
Consumer loans		1,507			1,674

Loans, net of unearned income		666,586			641,059
Allowance for loan losses		(8,123	)		(7,049	)

Total loans receivable, net		658,463			634,010

Premises and equipment, net		14,449			15,237
Federal Home Loan Bank of New York stock, at cost		4,670			4,174
Bank owned life insurance		9,645			9,481
Accrued interest receivable		3,505			3,697
Core deposit intangibles, net		304			380
Other assets		18,707			15,222

Total assets	$	808,649		$	791,428

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
LIABILITIES:
Deposits:
Savings	$	116,229		$	117,438
Non-Interest Bearing Checking		55,038			56,505
NOW		49,274			48,371
Money Market		45,967			43,190
Certificates of Deposit		338,173			337,912

Total Deposits		604,681			603,416
Advances from the FHLB-New York and other borrowed money		130,003			115,017
Other liabilities		8,618			8,657

Total liabilities		743,302			727,090
Stockholders’ equity:
Preferred stock (TARP) (par value $0.01 per share, 2,000,000 shares authorized; 18,980 shares, with a liquidation preference of $1,000.00 per share, issued and outstanding as of September 30, 2009 and March 31, 2009)		18,980			18,980
Common stock (par value $0.01 per share: 10,000,000 shares authorized; 2,524,691 shares issued; 2,474,719 and 2,475,037 shares outstanding at September 30, 2009 and March 31, 2009, respectively		25			25
Additional paid-in capital		24,226			24,214
Retained earnings		22,430			21,898
Treasury stock, at cost (49,972 and 49,654 shares at September 30, 2009 and March 31, 2009, respectively)		(697	)		(760	)
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)		383			(19	)

Total stockholders’ equity		65,347			64,338

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	808,649		$	791,428

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements

CARVER BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(In thousands, except per share data)
(Unaudited)


	Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended
	September 30,						September 30,
	2009			2008			2009			2008
Interest Income:
Loans	$	9,688		$	9,840		$	18,788		$	20,293
Mortgage-backed securities		688			603			1,431			1,165
Investment securities		126			98			186			170
Money market investments		5			2			15			40

Total interest income		10,507			10,543			20,420			21,668

Interest expense:
Deposits		1,777			3,361			3,815			7,500
Advances and other borrowed money		951			981			1,936			1,709

Total interest expense		2,728			4,342			5,751			9,209


Net interest income		7,779			6,201			14,669			12,459

Provision for loan losses		1,315			170			2,003			339

Net interest income after provision for loan losses		6,464			6,031			12,666			12,120

Non-interest income:
Depository fees and charges		782			713			1,499			1,381
Loan fees and service charges		339			389			567			806
Loss on sale of real estate owned		—			—			(34	)		—
Other		32			469			274			1,132

Total non-interest income		1,153			1,571			2,306			3,319

Non-interest expense:
Employee compensation and benefits		3,194			3,616			6,313			7,030
Net occupancy expense		1,155			903			2,142			1,919
Equipment, net		416			694			1,000			1,309
Consulting fees		162			265			369			430
Federal deposit insurance premiums		255			125			1,048			156
Other		1,756			1,702			3,123			3,796

Total non-interest expense		6,938			7,305			13,995			14,640

Income before income taxes and minority interest		679			297			977			799
Income tax benefit		(140	)		(422	)		(536	)		(745	)
Minority interest, net of taxes		—			98			—			237

Net income	$	819		$	621		$	1,513		$	1,307


Earnings per common share:
Basic	$	0.23		$	0.25		$	0.42		$	0.53

Diluted	$	0.23		$	0.25		$	0.41		$	0.52

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements

CARVER BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
For the Six months ended September 30, 2009
(In thousands)
(Unaudited)


													Accumulated
	Preferred				Additional								Other			Total
	Stock		Common		Paid-In		Treasury			Retained			Comprehensive			Stockholders’
	(TARP)		Stock		Capital		Stock			Earnings			Income (Loss)			Equity
Balance —March 31, 2009	$	18,980	$	25	$	24,214	$	(760	)	$	21,898		$	(19	)	$	64,338
Net income		—		—		—		—			1,513			—			1,513
Change in net unrealized loss on available- for-sale securities, net of taxes		—		—		—		—			—			402			402


Comprehensive income (loss), net of taxes :		—		—		—		—			1,513			402			1,915

Common Dividends paid		—		—		—		—			(494	)		—			(494	)

TARP Preferred Dividends paid		—		—		—		—			(474	)		—			(474	)

Treasury stock activity		—		—		5		63			—			—			68

Stock based compensation		—		—		7		—			(12	)		—			(5	)


Balance —September 30, 2009	$	18,980	$	25	$	24,226	$	(697	)	$	22,430		$	3 83		$	65,347

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements

CARVER BANCORP, INC, AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(in thousands)
(Unaudited)


	Six Months Ended September 30,
	2009			2008
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net income	$	1,513		$	1,307
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash from operating activities:
Provision for loan losses		2,003			339
Provision for REO losses		—			28
Stock based compensation expense		5			(9	)
Depreciation and amortization expense		943			939
Amortization of premiums and discounts		295			102
Loss from sale of real estate owned		34			—
Gain on sale of loans		(4	)		(246	)
Originations of loans held-for-sale		(647	)		(9,097	)
Proceeds from sale of loans held-for-sale		818			9,889
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Decrease in accrued interest receivable		192			271
Decrease in loan premiums and discounts and deferred charges		294			43
Increase in premiums and discounts — securities		—			66
(Increase) decrease in other assets		(5,682	)		5,981
Increase (decrease) in other liabilities		(39	)		(2,154	)

Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities		(275	)		7,459


INVESTING AC TIVITIES
Purchase of available-for-sale securites		—			(12,446	)
Proceeds from principal payments, maturities and calls of securities:
Available-for-sale		7,607			2,628
Held-to-maturity		1,968			901
Originations of loans held-for-investment		(66,138	)		(70,248	)
Loans purchased from third parties		(6,726	)		—
Principal collections on loans		49,496			66,887
Purchase of FHLB-NY stock		(496	)		(2,298	)
Additions to premises and equipment		(155	)		(990	)
Proceeds from sale of real estate owned		522			949

Net cash used in investing activities		(13,922	)		(14,617	)


FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Net increase (decrease) in deposits		1,265			(54,845	)
Net borrowing of FHLB advances and other borrowings		14,986			50,813
Common stock repurchased		—			(159	)
Dividends paid		(969	)		(494	)

Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities		15,282			(4,685	)

Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents		1,085			(11,843	)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period		13,341			27,368

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	14,426		$	15,525

Supplemental information:
Noncash Transfers-
Change in unrealized loss on valuation of available-for-sale investments, net	$	402		$	(201	)
Cash paid for-
Interest	$	8,214		$	9,482
Income taxes	$	88		$	80

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements

CARVER BANCORP, INC AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

1. Organization

Nature of operations

Carver Bancorp, Inc. (on a stand-alone basis, the “Holding Company” or “Registrant”), incorporated in May 1996, is the holding company for Carver Federal Savings Bank (the “Bank”). The Bank’s material subsidiaries include Carver Community Development Corp. (“CCDC”) and CFSB Realty Corp. The Bank also has a majority owned interest in Carver Asset Corporation, a real estate investment trust formed in February 2004.

The Bank was chartered in 1948 and began operations in 1949 as Carver Federal Savings and Loan Association, a federally chartered mutual savings and loan association. The Bank converted to a federal savings bank in 1986. On October 24, 1994, the Bank converted from mutual to stock form and issued 2,314,275 shares of its common stock, par value $0.01 per share. On October 17, 1996, the Bank completed its reorganization into a holding company structure (the “Reorganization”) and became a wholly owned subsidiary of the Holding Company.

The Bank was founded to serve African-American communities whose residents, businesses and institutions had limited access to mainstream financial services. Today, The Bank is the largest African-American operated bank in the United States. The Bank remains dedicated to expanding wealth and enhancing opportunities in the communities it serves by increasing access to capital and other financial services for consumers, businesses and non-profit organizations, including faith-based institutions. The Bank remains headquartered in Harlem, and predominantly all of its nine branches and eleven stand-alone 24/7 ATM Centers are located in low- to moderate-income neighborhoods. Many of these historically underserved communities have experienced unprecedented growth and diversification of incomes, ethnicity and economic opportunity, after decades of public and private investment. The Bank’s principal business consists of attracting deposit accounts through its branches and investing those funds in mortgage loans, small business loans and other investments permitted by federal savings banks.

The Bank formalized its many community focused investments on August 18, 2005, by forming CCDC. CCDC oversees the Bank’s participation in local economic development and other community-based initiatives, including financial literacy activities. CCDC is now coordinating the Bank’s development of an innovative approach to reach the unbanked customer market in the Bank’s communities. Importantly, CCDC spearheads the Bank’s applications for grants and other resources to help fund these important community activities. In this regard, the Bank has successfully competed with large regional and global financial institutions in a number of competitions for government grants and other awards. In June 2006, the Bank was selected by the U.S. Department of the Treasury (the “Treasury”) to receive an award of $59 million in New Market Tax Credits (“NMTC”). In May 2009, the Bank was selected to receive a second NMTC award in the amount of $65 million. These credits enable the Bank to invest with community and development partners in economic development projects with attractive terms including, in some cases, below market interest rates, which may have the effect of attracting capital to underserved communities and facilitating revitalization of the community. The NMTC award provides substantive credits to the Bank against Federal income taxes when the Bank makes qualified investments. For additional information regarding the Bank’s NMTC, refer to Item 2, “New Market Tax Credit Award.”

2. Basis of Presentation

The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements of the Holding Company have been prepared in accordance with United States generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by GAAP for complete consolidated financial statements. Certain information and note disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with GAAP have been condensed or omitted pursuant to the rules and regulations of the SEC. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of only normal recurring adjustments) necessary for a fair presentation of the financial condition, results of operations, changes in stockholders’ equity and cash flows of the Holding Company and its subsidiaries on a consolidated basis as of and for the periods shown have been included.

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts in the consolidated financial statements. Amounts subject to significant estimates and assumptions are items such as the allowance for loan losses and lending—related commitments, valuation of mortgage servicing rights (“MSR”), goodwill and intangibles, pensions, assessment of other than temporary impairment and the fair value of financial instruments and recoverability of deferred tax assets. The Company’s ability to utilize deferred tax assets generated by NMTC income tax benefits over the next five years, as well as other deferred tax assets, depends on its ability to meet the NMTC compliance requirements and its ability to generate sufficient taxable income from operations or from potential tax strategies to generate taxable income in the future. The Company has $11.1 million of deferred tax assets as of September 30, 2009. The current economic environment has increased the uncertainty inherent in these estimates. Actual results could differ from these estimates.

Effective July 1, 2009, we adopted the provisions of Financial Accounting Standards Board, or FASB, Accounting Standards Codification^TM, (the “FASB ASC”), which is now the source of authoritative, nongovernmental GAAP. While the FASB ASC did not change GAAP, all existing authoritative accounting literature, with certain exceptions, was superseded and codified into the FASB ASC. The references to authoritative accounting literature contained in our disclosures have been modified to refer to general accounting topics within the FASB ASC.

The unaudited consolidated financial statements presented herein should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in the Holding Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2009, as previously filed with the SEC. The consolidated results of operations and other data for the three- and six-month periods ended September 30, 2009 are not necessarily indicative of results that may be expected for the entire fiscal year ending March 31, 2010 (“fiscal 2010”).

Immaterial Corrections

The Bank has adjusted its previously reported amounts included in Note 12 of the consolidated financial statements for year ended March 31, 2009 related to the Bank’s regulatory capital disclosures. The OTS capital adequacy guidelines require certain exclusions as noted in the OTS Capital Requirements in arriving at Tangible Equity, Leverage Capital and Risk-Based Capital. The Bank’s originally disclosed regulatory capital amounts did not appropriately exclude the disallowable portion of deferred tax balances. Accordingly, the Bank has adjusted its previously reported capital disclosures as of March 31, 2009 to exclude the disallowable portion of the net deferred tax asset amounting to $9.4 million from its calculated Regulatory Capital amounts and has included this revised disclosure in Note 12 of these interim financial statements. The impact of this correction is a reduction in the previously reported Tangible Equity, Leverage Capital and Risk-Based Capital and the corresponding regulatory capital excess by $9.4million. Notwithstanding this adjustment, the Bank exceeded all regulatory minimum capital requirements, under OTS regulations, as a well-capitalized institution as at March 31, 2009.

Additionally, the above immaterial correction had no impact to the amounts previously reported in the consolidated statements of financial condition, operations, changes in stockholders’ equity and comprehensive income (loss), and cash flows or other financial statement footnote disclosures. Accordingly, management considers the impact of this correction to be immaterial to the previously reported financial position, results of operations and cash flows reported in the consolidated financial statements for the year ended March 31, 2009.

Reclassifications

Certain amounts in the consolidated financial statements presented for the prior year period have been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation.

3. Earnings per Share

In June 2008, the FASB issued additional accounting guidance, which we adopted on January 1, 2009, related to participating securities which clarified the treatment of such securities for earnings per share (“EPS”) computation purposes. The guidance concluded that unvested share-based payment awards that contain nonforfeitable rights to dividends or dividend equivalents are participating securities and are to be included in the computation of EPS pursuant to the two-class method. Our restricted stock awards are considered participating securities pursuant to this guidance. The two-class method excludes from EPS calculations any dividends paid to participating securities and any undistributed earnings attributable to participating securities from the numerator and excludes the dilutive impact of the participating securities from the denominator. Prior period EPS data has been presented in accordance with this guidance.

Basic EPS is computed by dividing income available to common stockholders by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding. In calculating EPS for the quarter ended September 30, 2009, dividends paid pursuant to the Company’s participation in the United States, Department of Treasury Troubled Asset Relief Program, Capital Purchase Program (“TARP CPP”) reduced the income available to common shareholders, thereby reducing EPS for September 30, 2009 compared to September 30, 2008. Further, income available to common shareholders was reduced by the dividend paid to unvested restricted shares granted under the Company’s Management Recognition Plan (“MRP”) which are participating securities in accordance with the FASB guidance noted above. Diluted earnings per common share includes any additional common shares as if all potentially dilutive common shares were issued (for instance, stock options with an exercise price that is less than the average market price of the common shares for the periods stated). For the purpose of these calculations, unreleased Employee Stock Ownership Program (“ESOP”) shares are not considered to be outstanding. For the quarters ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively, 18,426 and 29,571 shares of common stock were potentially issuable from the exercise of stock options with an exercise price that is less than the average market price of the common shares and unvested restricted stock grants for the same period. The effects of these potentially dilutive common shares were considered in determining the diluted earnings per common share.

4. Accounting for Stock Based Compensation

The Company follows FASB issued accounting guidance on stock-based compensation, which requires that all stock-based compensation be recognized as an expense in the financial statements and that such cost be measured at the fair value of the award. This statement was adopted using the modified prospective method of application, which requires the Company to recognize compensation expense on a prospective basis. Therefore, prior period financial statements have not been restated. Under this method, in addition to reflecting compensation expense for new share-based awards, expense is also recognized to reflect the remaining service period of awards that had been included in pro forma disclosures in prior periods. The accounting guidance also requires that excess tax benefits related to stock option exercises be reflected as financing cash inflows instead of operating cash inflows in the consolidated statement of cash flows. Stock-based compensation expense and the related tax benefit recognized for the quarters ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 totaled $0 and $27,000, respectively, and for the six months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 totaled $5,000 and $9,000, respectively.

5. Benefit Plans

Employee Pension Plan

The Bank has a non-contributory defined benefit pension plan covering all eligible employees. The benefits are based on each employee’s term of service. The Bank’s policy was to fund the plan with contributions equal to the maximum amount deductible for federal income tax purposes. The pension plan was curtailed and future benefit accruals ceased as of December 31, 2000.

Under the FASB guidance on employers’ disclosures about plan assets of a defined benefit pension or other postretirement plan, the employers of public and nonpublic entities are required to: (a) disclose more information about how investment allocation decisions are made; (b) provide more information about major categories of plan assets, including concentrations of risk and fair-value measurements, and the fair-value techniques and inputs used to measure plan assets. In accordance with the guidance, the Company has adopted a measurement date as of the fiscal year-end of March 31.

6. Common Stock Dividend

On November 12, 2009, the Board of Directors of the Holding Company declared, for the quarter ended September 30, 2009, a cash dividend of ten cents ($0.10) per common share outstanding. The dividend is payable on December 14, 2009 to stockholders of record at the close of business on November 28, 2009.

7. Investment Securities

In April 2009, the FASB issued guidance that changes the amount of an other-than-temporary impairment that is recognized in earnings when there are non-credit losses on a debt security which management does not intend to sell, and for which it is more-likely-than-not that the entity will not be required to sell the security prior to the recovery of the non-credit impairment. In those situations, the portion of the total impairment that is attributable to the credit loss would be recognized in earnings, and the remaining difference between the debt security’s amortized cost basis and its fair value would be included in other comprehensive income. This guidance also requires additional disclosures about investments in an unrealized loss position and the methodology and significant inputs used in determining the recognition of other-than-temporary impairment. This guidance is effective for interim and annual reporting periods ending after June 15, 2009. Our adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on our financial condition or results of operations.

The following table sets forth the amortized cost and estimated fair value of securities available-for-sale and held-to-maturity at September 30, 2009 (in thousands):


	Amortized		Gross Unrealized					Estimated
	Cost		Gains		Losses			Fair-Value
Available-for-Sale:
Mortgage-backed securities:
Government National Mortgage Association	$	33,740	$	200	$	(91	)	$	33,849
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation		5,121		214		(1	)		5,334
Federal National Mortgage Association		11,899		568		(3	)		12,464
Other		513		7		(47	)		473

Total mortgage-backed securities		51,273		989		(142	)		52,120
U.S. Government Agency Securities		—		—		—			—

Total available-for-sale	$	51,273	$	989	$	(142	)	$	52,120


	Amortized		Gross Unrealized					Estimated
	Cost		Gains		Losses			Fair-Value
Held-to-Maturity:
Mortgage-backed securities:
Government National Mortgage Association	$	449	$	35	$	—		$	484
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation		9,070		38		(21	)		9,087
Federal National Mortgage Association		3,135		160		(0	)		3,295

Total mortgage-backed securities		12,654		233		(21	)		12,866
Other		149		—		(3	)		146

Total held-to-maturity		12,803		233		(24	)		13,012

Total securities	$	64,076	$	1,222	$	(166	)	$	65,132

The following table sets forth the amortized cost and estimated fair value of securities available-for-sale and held-to-maturity at March 31, 2009 (in thousands):


	Amortized		Gross Unrealized					Estimated
	Cost		Gains		Losses			Fair-Value
Available-for-Sale:
Mortgage-backed securities:
Government National Mortgage Association	$	39,252	$	26	$	(486	)	$	38,792
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation		5,847		185		(2	)		6,030
Federal National Mortgage Association		13,872		493		(8	)		14,357
Other		571		—		(37	)		534

Total mortgage-backed securities		59,542		704		(533	)		59,713
U.S. Government Agency Securities		254		6		—			260

Total available-for-sale	$	59,796	$	710	$	(533	)	$	59,973


	Amortized		Gross Unrealized					Estimated
	Cost		Gains		Losses			Fair-Value
Held-to-Maturity:
Mortgage-backed securities:
Government National Mortgage Association	$	488	$	27	$	—		$	515
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation		10,292		17		(153	)		10,156
Federal National Mortgage Association		3,870		80		(248	)		3,702

Total mortgage-backed securities		14,650		124		(401	)		14,373
Other		158		—		(3	)		155

Total held-to-maturity		14,808		124		(404	)		14,528

Total securities	$	74,604	$	834	$	(937	)	$	74,501

The following table sets forth the unrealized losses and fair value of securities at September 30, 2009 for less than 12 months and 12 months or longer (in thousands):


	Less than 12 months					12 months or longer					Total
	Unrealized			Fair		Unrealized			Fair		Unrealized			Fair
	Losses			Value		Losses			Value		Losses			Value
Available -for-Sale :
Mortgage-backed securities	$	(68	)	$	10,868	$	(74	)	$	1,297	$	(142	)	$	12,165

Total available-for-sale	$	(68	)	$	10,868	$	(74	)	$	1,297	$	(142	)	$	12,165


Held-to-Maturity:
Mortgage-backed securities	$	—		$	—	$	(21	)	$	7,304	$	(21	)	$	7,304
Other		—			—		(3	)		146		(3	)		146

Total held-to-maturity		—			—		(24	)		7,450		(24	)		7,450

Total securities	$	(68	)	$	10,868	$	(98	)	$	8,747	$	(166	)	$	19,615

The review of the portfolio for other-than-temporary impairment considers the percentage and length of time the market value of an investment is below book value as well as general market conditions, changes in interest rates, credit risk and whether the Company has the intent to sell the securities and whether it is not more likely than not that the Company would be required to sell the securities before the anticipated recovery. The unrealized losses on the above investment securities was primarily caused by movements in market interest rates and spread volatility rather than credit risk. The securities with unrealized losses comprises of mainly mortgage backed securities issued by government-sponsored enterprises. The Company purchased these securities either at par or at a discount relative to their face amount, and the contractual cash flows of these investments are guaranteed by the GSEs. Accordingly, it is expected that these securities would not be settled at a price that is less than the amortized cost of the Company’s investment.

Because the Company does not have the intent to sell the investments and it is not more likely than not that the Company will be required to sell the investments before anticipated recovery of fair value, which may be at maturity, the Company did not consider these investments to be other-than-temporarily impaired at September 30, 2009.

The following table sets forth the unrealized losses and fair value of securities at March 31, 2009 for less than 12 months and 12 months or longer (in thousands):


	Less than 12 months					12 months or longer					Total
	Unrealized			Fair		Unrealized			Fair		Unrealized			Fair
	Losses			Value		Losses			Value		Losses			Value
Available -for-Sale :
Mortgage-backed securities	$	(441	)	$	30,008	$	(92	)	$	2,938	$	(533	)	$	32,946

Total available-for-sale	$	(441	)	$	30,008	$	(92	)	$	2,938	$	(533	)	$	32,946


Held-to-Maturity:
Mortgage-backed securities	$	(246	)	$	2,119	$	(155	)	$	8,682	$	(401	)	$	10,801
Other		—			—		(3	)		155		(3	)		155

Total held-to-maturity		(246	)		2,119		(158	)		8,837		(404	)		10,956

Total securities	$	(687	)	$	32,127	$	(250	)	$	11,775	$	(937	)	$	43,902

8. Fair Value Measurements

In April 2009, the FASB issued guidance regarding the estimation of fair value when the volume and level of activity for the asset or liability has significantly decreased, including guidance on identifying circumstances that indicate a transaction is not orderly. Under this guidance, if the reporting entity concludes there has been a significant decrease in the volume and level of activity for the asset or liability, transactions or quoted prices may not be determinative of fair value. Further analysis is required and significant adjustments to the transactions or quoted prices may be necessary. This guidance is effective for interim and annual reporting periods ending after June 15, 2009. The Company considered this guidance in estimating the fair value of assets and liabilities at September 30, 2009.

The FASB accounting guidance establishes a three-tier fair value hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs used in measuring fair value as follows:

	•		Level 1— Inputs to the valuation methodology are quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities in active markets.

	•		Level 2— Inputs to the valuation methodology include quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, and inputs that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the financial instrument.

	•		Level 3— Inputs to the valuation methodology are unobservable and significant to the fair value measurement.

A financial instrument’s categorization within this valuation hierarchy is based upon the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement.

The following table presents assets that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of September 30, 2009 and March 31, 2009, and that are included in the Company’s Consolidated Statement of Financial Condition:


	Fair Value Measurements at September 30, 2009, Using
	Quoted Prices in Active		Significant Other		Significant
	Markets for Identical		Observable Inputs		Unobservable		Total Fair
(in thousands)	Assets (Level 1)		(Level 2)		Inputs (Level 3)		Value
Mortgage servicing rights	$	—	$	—	$	633	$	633
Securities available for sale	$	—	$	52,075	$	45	$	52,120


	Fair Value Measurements at March 31, 2009, Using
	Quoted Prices in Active		Significant Other		Significant
	Markets for Identical		Observable Inputs		Unobservable		Total Fair
(in thousands)	Assets (Level 1)		(Level 2)		Inputs (Level 3)		Value
Mortgage servicing rights	$	—	$	—	$	452	$	452
Securities available for sale	$	—	$	59,928	$	45	$	59,973

Instruments for which unobservable inputs are significant to their fair value measurement (i.e., Level 3) include mortgage servicing rights and securities available-for-sale. Level 3 assets accounted for 0.1% of the Company’s total assets at September 30, 2009.

The Company reviews and updates the fair value hierarchy classifications on a quarterly basis. Changes from one quarter to the next that are related to the observable inputs of a fair value measurement may result in a reclassification from one hierarchy level to another.

A description of the methods and significant assumptions utilized in estimating the fair value of available-for-sale securities follows:

Where quoted prices are available in an active market, securities are classified within Level 1 of the valuation hierarchy. Level 1 securities include highly liquid government securities and exchange-traded securities.

If quoted market prices are not available for the specific security, then fair values are estimated by using pricing models, quoted prices of securities with similar characteristics, or discounted cash flows. These pricing models primarily use market-based or independently sourced market parameters as inputs, including, but not limited to, yield curves, interest rates, equity or debt prices, and credit spreads. In addition to market information, models also incorporate transaction details, such as maturity and cash flow assumptions. Securities valued in this manner would generally be classified within Level 2 of the valuation hierarchy and primarily include such instruments as mortgage-related securities and corporate debt.

In certain cases where there is limited activity or less transparency around inputs to the valuation, securities are classified within Level 3 of the valuation hierarchy. Quoted price information for mortgage servicing rights (“MSR”) is not available. Therefore, MSR are valued using market-standard models to model the specific cash flow structure. Key inputs to the model consist of principal balance of loans being serviced, servicing fees and prepayment rate. The fair value of securities available-for-sale is determined internally by management.

The methods described above may produce a fair value calculation that may not be indicative of net realizable value or reflective of future fair values. Furthermore, while the Company believes its valuation methods are appropriate and consistent with those of other market participants, the use of different methodologies or assumptions to determine the fair value of certain financial instruments could result in a different estimate of fair value at the reporting date.

The following table presents information for assets classified by the Company within Level 3 of the valuation hierarchy for the three months ended September 30, 2009:


	Mortgage		Securities
	Servicing		Available for
(in thousands)	Rights		Sale
Beginning balance, April 1, 2009	$	451	$	45
Additions		137		—
Total unrealized gain		45		—

Ending balance, September 30, 2009	$	633	$	45

9. Fair Value of Financial Instruments

In April 2009, the FASB issued guidance requiring disclosures about fair value of financial instruments for interim reporting periods of a publicly traded company, as well as in annual financial statements. The disclosure requirements are effective for interim reporting periods ending after June 15, 2009, and are included in Note 7 to the unaudited consolidated financial statements. Since this guidance is disclosure related, our adoption did not have an impact on our financial condition or results of operations.

Quoted market prices available in formal trading marketplaces are typically the best evidence of fair value of financial instruments. In many cases, financial instruments we hold are not bought or sold in formal trading market places. Accordingly, fair values are derived or estimated based on a variety of valuation techniques in the absence of quoted market prices. Fair value estimates are made at a specific point in time, based on relevant market information about the financial instrument. These estimates do not reflect any possible tax ramifications, estimated transaction costs, or any premium or discount that could result from offering for sale at one time our entire holdings of a particular financial instrument. Because no market exists for a certain portion of our financial instruments, fair value estimates are based on judgments regarding future loss experience, current economic conditions, risk characteristics, and other such factors. These estimates are subjective in nature, involve uncertainties and, therefore, cannot be determined with precision. Changes in assumptions could significantly affect the estimates. For these reasons and others, the estimated fair value disclosures presented herein do not represent our entire underlying value. As such, readers are cautioned in using this information for purposes of evaluating our financial condition and/or value either alone or in comparison with any other company.

The carrying amounts and estimated fair values of the Company’s financial instruments at September 30, 2009 and March 31, 2009 are as follows:


	September 30, 2009				March 31, 2009
	Carrying		Estimated		Carrying		Estimated
	Amount		Fair Value		Amount		Fair Value
Financial Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	14,426	$	14,426	$	13,341	$	13,341
Investment securities available-for-sale		—		—		260		260
Mortgage backed securities available-for-sale		52,120		52,120		59,713		59,713
Mortgage backed securities held-to-maturity		12,803		13,012		14,808		14,528
Loans receivable		658,463		660,611		634,010		649,219
Loans held-for-sale		19,557		19,557		21,105		22,467
Accrued interest receivable		3,505		3,505		3,697		3,697
Mortgage servicing rights		633		633		452		452
Financial Liabilities:
Deposits	$	604,681	$	579,246	$	603,416	$	610,455
Advances from FHLB of New York		81,600		84,387		71,614		71,592
Other borrowed money		48,403		43,403		43,403		46,179

Cash and cash equivalents and accrued interest receivable

The carrying amounts for cash and cash equivalents and accrued interest receivable approximate fair value because they mature in three months or less.

Securities

The fair values for investment securities available-for-sale and mortgage-backed securities available-for-sale and held-to-maturity and are based on quoted market or dealer prices, if available. If quoted market or dealer prices are not available, fair value is estimated using quoted market or dealer prices for similar securities.

Loans receivable and loan held-for-sale

The fair value of loans receivable and held-for-sale is estimated by discounting future cash flows, using current rates at which similar loans would be made to borrowers with similar credit ratings and for the same remaining maturities of such loans.

Mortgage servicing rights

The fair value of mortgage servicing rights is determined by discounting the present value of estimated future servicing cash flows using current market assumptions for prepayments, servicing costs and other factors.

Deposits

The fair value of demand, savings and club accounts is equal to the amount payable on demand at the reporting date. The fair value of certificates of deposit is estimated using rates currently offered for deposits of similar remaining maturities. The fair value estimates do not include the benefit that results from the low-cost funding provided by deposit liabilities compared to the cost of borrowing funds in the market.

Borrowings

The fair values of advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank of New York and other borrowed money are estimated using the rates currently available to the Bank for debt with similar terms and remaining maturities.

Limitations

The fair value estimates are made at a discrete point in time based on relevant market information about the financial instruments. These estimates do not reflect any premium or discount that could result from offering for sale at one time the entire holdings of a particular financial instrument. Because no quoted market value exists for a significant portion of the Bank’s financial instruments, fair value estimates are based on judgments regarding future expected loss experience, current economic conditions, risk characteristics of various financial instruments, and other factors. These estimates are subjective in nature and involve uncertainties and matters of significant judgment and, therefore, cannot be determined with precision. Changes in assumptions could significantly affect the estimates.

In addition, the fair value estimates are based on existing off balance sheet financial instruments without attempting to value anticipated future business and the value of assets and liabilities that are not considered financial instruments. Other significant assets and liabilities that are not considered financial assets and liabilities include premises and equipment. In addition, the tax ramifications related to the realization of unrealized gains and losses can have a significant effect on fair value estimates and have not been considered in any of the estimates.

Finally, reasonable comparability between financial institutions may not be likely due to the wide range of permitted valuation techniques and numerous estimates which must be made given the absence of active secondary markets for many of the financial instruments. This lack of uniform valuation methodologies introduces a greater degree of subjectivity to these estimated fair values.

10. Variable Interest Entities

In June 2009, the FASB issued a standard that requires reporting entities to evaluate former qualifying special purpose entities for consolidation, changes the approach to determining a variable interest entity’s (“VIE”) primary beneficiary, increases the frequency of required assessments to determine whether a company is the primary beneficiary of a VIE, clarifies the characteristics that identify a VIE, and requires additional annual and interim disclosures. This standard is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2009. The adoption of this standard is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s financial condition, results of operations or financial statement disclosures.

Carver Statutory Trust I was formed in 2003 for the purpose of issuing $13.0 million aggregate liquidation amount of floating rate Capital Securities due September 17, 2033 (“Capital Securities”) and $0.4 million of common securities (which are the only voting securities of Carver Statutory Trust I), which are 100% owned by Carver Bancorp Inc., and using the proceeds to acquire Junior Subordinated Debentures issued by Carver Bancorp Inc. Carver Bancorp Inc. has fully and unconditionally guaranteed the Capital Securities along with all obligations of Carver Statutory Trust I under the trust agreement relating to the Capital Securities. Accordingly, Carver Statutory Trust I is not consolidated in Carver Bancorp, Inc. for financial reporting purpose.

The Bank’s subsidiary, Carver Community Development Corporation (“CCDC”), was formed to facilitate its participation in local economic development and other community-based activities. Per the NMTC Award’s Allocation Agreement between the CDFI Fund and CCDC, CCDC is permitted to form and sub-allocate credits to subsidiary Community Development Entities (“CDEs”) to facilitate investments in separate development projects. The Bank was originally awarded $59.0 million of NMTC. In fiscal 2008, the Bank transferred rights to an investor in a NMTC project totaling $19.2 million and recognized a gain on the transfer of rights of $1.7 million. The Bank was required to maintain a .01% interest in the entity with the investor owning the remaining 99.99%. The entity was called CDE-10. For financial reporting purposes, the $19.2 million transfer of rights to an investor in a NMTC project was reflected in the other assets and the minority interest sections of the

balance sheet as the entity to which the rights were transferred was required to be consolidated. In fiscal 2009, following certain amendments to the agreement between CCDC and the investor that resulted in a reconsideration event, the Bank deconsolidated the entity for financial statement reporting purposes. However, under the current arrangement, the Bank has a contingent obligation to reimburse the investor for any loss or shortfall incurred as a result of the NTMC project not being in compliance with certain regulations that would void the investor’s ability to otherwise utilize tax credits stemming from the award. The maximum possible loss to Carver from such an arrangement is approximately $7.4 million. At September 30, 2009, Carver had not recorded any liability with respect to this obligation in accordance with the new accounting guidance.

With respect to the remaining $40 million of NMTC awards, the Bank has established various special purpose entities through which its investments in NMTC eligible activities are conducted. Accordingly, all of these special purpose entities were consolidated in the Bank’s Statement of Financial Condition as of September 30, 2009 and March 31, 2009 resulting in the consolidation of assets of approximately $45.2 million and $36.9 million, respectively.

11. Impact of Accounting Standards and Interpretations

In June 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued a standard that establishes the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (the “Codification”) as the source of authoritative GAAP for nongovernmental entities. The Codification supersedes all existing non-SEC accounting and reporting standards. Rules and interpretative releases of the SEC under the authority of Federal securities laws remain authoritative GAAP for SEC registrants. The Codification is effective for financial statements issued for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. The adoption of the Codification did not have any impact on the Company’s financial condition, results of operations or amounts reported in financial statement disclosures.

In June 2009, the FASB issued a standard that eliminates the concept of a qualifying special purpose entity, creates more stringent conditions for reporting a transfer of a portion of a financial asset as a sale, clarifies the derecognition criteria, revises how retained interests are initially measured, removes the guaranteed mortgage securitization recharacterization provisions, and requires additional annual and interim disclosures. This standard is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2009. The adoption of this standard is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s financial condition, results of operations or financial statement disclosures.

In June 2009, the FASB issued a standard that requires management to evaluate subsequent events through the date financial statements are issued and to disclose the date through which such evaluation occurred. The Company has evaluated subsequent events through the November 13, 2009 issuance date of the unaudited consolidated financial statements included in this Form 10-Q (see footnote 13).

In April 2009, the FASB issued guidance regarding the estimation of fair value when the volume and level of activity for the asset or liability have significantly decreased, including guidance on identifying circumstances that indicate a transaction is not orderly. Under this guidance, if the reporting entity concludes there has been a significant decrease in the volume and level of activity for the asset or liability, transactions or quoted prices may not be determinative of fair value. Further analysis is required and significant adjustments to the transactions or quoted prices may be necessary. This guidance is effective for interim and annual reporting periods ending after June 15, 2009. The Company considered this guidance in estimating the fair value of assets and liabilities at September 30, 2009.

In April 2009, the FASB issued guidance that changes the amount of an other-than-temporary impairment (“OTTI”) that is recognized in earnings when there are non-credit losses on a debt security which management does not intend to sell, and for which it is more-likely-than-not that the entity will not be required to sell the security prior to the recovery of the non-credit impairment. In those situations, the portion of the total impairment that is attributable to the credit loss would be recognized in earnings, and the remaining difference between the debt security’s amortized cost basis and its fair value would be included in other comprehensive income. This guidance also requires additional disclosures about investments in an unrealized loss position and the methodology and significant inputs used in determining the recognition of other-than-temporary impairment. This guidance is effective for interim and annual reporting periods ending after June 15, 2009. The adoption of this guidance is reflected in the unaudited consolidated financial statements and in Note 7 thereto.

In April 2009, the FASB issued guidance requiring disclosures about fair value of financial instruments for interim reporting periods of a publicly traded company, as well as in annual financial statements. The disclosure requirements are effective for interim reporting periods ending after June 15, 2009, and are included in Note 9 to the unaudited consolidated financial statements.

In June 2008, the FASB issued guidance that requires unvested share-based payment awards that contain non-forfeitable rights to dividends or dividend equivalents to be treated as participating securities and, therefore, included in the earnings allocation in computing earnings per share under the two-class method. This guidance is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008, and interim periods within those years. Upon adoption, all previously reported earnings per share data must be retroactively adjusted to conform with the requirements of this guidance. The adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on the Company’s calculation of earnings per share for the periods presented.

In December 2007, the FASB issued a standard that establishes accounting and reporting standards for the non-controlling interest in a subsidiary and for the deconsolidation of a subsidiary. This standard clarifies that a non-controlling interest in a subsidiary, which is sometimes referred to as a minority interest, is an ownership interest in the consolidated entity that should be reported as a component of equity in the consolidated financial statements. Among other requirements, this standard requires consolidated net income to be reported at amounts that include the amounts attributable to both the parent and the non-controlling interest. It also requires disclosure, on the face of the consolidated income statement, of the amounts of consolidated net income attributable to the parent and to the non-controlling interest. This standard became effective on January 1, 2009. The adoption of this standard did not have a significant impact on the Company’s financial condition, results of operations or financial statement disclosures.

12. Regulatory Capital

The following is a summary of the Bank’s capital as of September 30, 2009 and March 31, 2009 compared to the OTS requirements for minimum capital adequacy and for classification as a well-capitalized institution (in thousands):


	GAAP		Tangible			Leverage			Risk-Based
	Capital		Equity			Capital			Capital

Stockholders’ Equity at September 30, 2009 ⁽¹⁾	$	78,093	$	78,093		$	78,093		$	78,093


Add:
General valuation allowances				—			—			8,123
Other				218			218			218
Deduct:
Disallowed deferred tax assets				9,051			9,051			9,051
Unrealized gains on securities available-for-sale, net				601			601			601
Goodwill and qualifying intangible assets, net				304			304			304

Regulatory Capital				68,355			68,355			76,478
Minimum Capital requirement				11,988			31,969			53,425

Regulatory Capital Excess			$	56,367		$	36,386		$	23,053


Capital Ratios				8.54	%		8.55	%		11.45	%


	GAAP		Tangible			Leverage			Risk-Based
	Capital		Equity			Capital			Capital

Stockholders’ Equity at March 31, 2009	$	77,634	$	77,634		$	77,634		$	77,634


Add:
General valuation allowances				—			—			7,049
Other				218			218			218
Deduct:
Disallowed deferred tax assets				9,426			9,426			9,426
Unrealized gains on securities available-for-sale, net				200			200			200
Goodwill and qualifying intangible assets, net				380			380			380

Regulatory Capital				67,846			67,846			74,895
Minimum Capital requirement				12,038			32,103			52,023

Regulatory Capital Excess			$	55,808		$	35,743		$	22,872


Capital Ratios				8.44	%		8.45	%		11.52	%

13. Subsequent Events

In May 2009, the FASB issued new accounting guidance to establish general standards of accounting for and disclosure of events that occur after the balance sheet date but before financial statements are issued or available to be issued. These new guidelines define: (i) the period after the balance sheet date during which a reporting entity’s management should evaluate events. Under the FASB guidance, the Company has evaluated whether any subsequent events that require recognition or disclosure in the accompanying financial statements and notes thereto have taken place through the date these financial statements were issued November 16, 2009.

On October 30, 2009, the Bank raised $14.1 million in a private placement of Senior Notes bearing a coupon of 1.69% per annum, maturing on October 31, 2011. This debt is guaranteed under the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation’s (the “FDIC”) Temporary Liquidity Guarantee Program. For this guarantee, the Bank is assessed a fee by FDIC in the amount of 125 basis points. The Bank will use the proceeds to increase its liquidity position and for general corporate purposes.

ITEM 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Forward-Looking Statements

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains certain “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 which may be identified by the use of such words as “may,” “believe,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “should,” “plan,” “estimate,” “predict,” “continue,” and “potential” or the negative of these terms or other comparable terminology. Examples of forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, estimates with respect to our financial condition, results of operations and business that are subject to various factors which could cause actual results to differ materially from these estimates. These factors include but are not limited to the following:

•		the Company’s success in implementing its new business initiatives, including expanding its product line, adding new branches and ATM centers and successfully building its brand image;

•		increases in competitive pressure among financial institutions or non-financial institutions;

•		legislative or regulatory changes which may adversely affect the Company’s business;

•		technological changes which may be more difficult to implement or expensive than anticipated;

•		changes in interest rates which may reduce net interest margin and net interest income;

•		changes in deposit flows, loan demand, real estate values, borrowing facilities, capital markets and investment opportunities which may adversely affect the business;

•		changes in existing loan portfolio composition and credit quality, and changes in loan loss requirements;

•		changes in accounting principles, policies or guidelines which may cause conditions to be perceived differently;

•		litigation or other matters before regulatory agencies, whether currently existing or commencing in the future, which may delay the occurrence or non-occurrence of events longer than anticipated;

•		the ability to originate and purchase loans with attractive terms and acceptable credit quality;

•		the ability to attract and retain key members of management;

•		the ability to realize cost efficiencies; and

•		general economic conditions, either nationally or locally in some or all areas in which business is conducted, or conditions in the real estate or securities markets or the banking industry which could affect liquidity in the capital markets, the volume of loan origination, deposit flows, real estate values, the levels of non-interest income and the amount of loan losses.

Any or all of the Company’s forward-looking statements in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and in any other public statements that the Company or management makes may turn out to be wrong. They can be affected by inaccurate assumptions we might make or by known or unknown risks and uncertainties. The forward-looking statements contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q are made as of the date of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, and the Company assumes no obligation to, and expressly disclaims any obligation to, update these forward-looking statements to reflect actual results, changes in assumptions or changes in other factors affecting such forward-looking statements or to update the reasons why actual results could differ from those projected in the forward-looking statements. For a discussion of additional factors that could adversely affect the Company’s future performance, see “Item 1A — Risk Factors”.

Overview

The following should be read in conjunction with the audited Consolidated Financial Statements, the notes thereto and other financial information included in the Company’s 2009 Form 10-K.

Carver Bancorp, Inc., a Delaware corporation, is the holding company for Carver Federal Savings Bank, a federally chartered savings bank, and, on a parent-only basis, had minimal results of operations. The Holding Company is headquartered in New York, New York. The Holding Company conducts business as a unitary savings and loan holding company, and the principal business of the Holding Company consists of the operation of its wholly-owned subsidiary, the Bank.

The Bank’s net income, like others in the banking industry, is dependent primarily on net interest income, which is the difference between interest income earned on its interest-earning assets such as loans, investment and mortgage-backed securities portfolios and the interest paid on its interest-bearing liabilities, such as deposits and borrowings. The Bank’s earnings are also affected by general economic and competitive conditions, particularly changes in market interest rates and government and regulatory policies. Additionally, net income is affected by incremental provisions for loan losses, if any, non-interest income, operating expenses and tax benefits from the NMTC award. The Bank engages in a wide range of consumer and commercial banking services. The Bank provides deposit products including demand, savings and time deposits for consumers, businesses, and governmental and quasi-governmental agencies in its local market area within New York City. In addition to deposit products, the Bank offers a number of other consumer and commercial banking products and services, including debit cards, online banking including online bill pay, and telephone banking.

The Bank offers loan products covering a variety of asset classes, including commercial, multi-family and residential mortgages, construction loans and business loans. The Bank finances mortgage and loan products through deposits or borrowings. Funds not used to originate mortgages and loans are invested primarily in U.S. government agency securities and mortgage-backed securities.

The Bank’s primary market area for deposits consists of areas currently served by its nine branches. The Bank’s branches are located in the Brooklyn, Manhattan and Queens boroughs of New York City. The neighborhoods in which the Bank’s branches are located have historically been low- to moderate-income areas. However, the shortage of housing in New York City, combined with population shifts from the suburbs into the city, has helped stimulate significant real estate and commercial development in the Bank’s market area.

The Bank’s primary lending market includes Bronx, Kings, New York and Queens Counties in New York City, and lower Westchester County, New York. Although the Bank’s branches are primarily located in areas that were historically underserved by other financial institutions, the Bank faces significant competition for deposits and mortgage lending in its market areas. Management believes that this competition has become more intense as a result of increased examination emphasis by federal banking regulators on financial institutions’ fulfillment of their responsibilities under the Community Reinvestment Act (“CRA”). The Bank’s larger competitors have greater financial resources, name recognition and market presence. The Bank’s competition for loans comes principally from mortgage banking companies, commercial banks, and savings institutions. The Bank’s most direct competition for deposits comes from commercial banks, savings institutions and credit unions. Competition for deposits also comes from money market mutual funds, corporate and government securities funds, and financial intermediaries such as brokerage firms and insurance companies. Many of the Bank’s competitors have substantially greater resources and offer a wider array of financial services and products. At times, these larger financial institutions may offer below market interest rates on mortgage loans and above market interest rates for deposits. These pricing concessions combined with competitors’ larger presence in the New York market add to the challenges the Bank faces in expanding its current market share and increasing its near-term profitability. The Bank’s 60 year history in its market area, its community involvement, relationships with key constituents, targeted products and services and personal service consistent with community banking, help the Bank compete with competitors that have entered its market.

The national economy remains in a recession, highlighted by the continuing deterioration of the housing and real estate markets and rising unemployment. Although there was a continued deterioration of the economy in the second quarter of 2009, this period represented an improvement over prior quarters, during which time the disruption and volatility in the financial and capital markets reached a crisis level as national and global credit markets ceased to function effectively. Concern for the stability of the banking and financial systems resulted in unprecedented government intervention including, but not limited to, the passage of the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008, or (“EESA”), the implementation of the Capital Purchase Program, or (“CPP”), the Temporary Liquidity Guarantee Program, or(“TLGP”), the Troubled Asset Relief Program, or (“TARP”), the Commercial Paper Funding Facility, or (“CPFF”), the Capital Assistance Program, or (“CAP”), the Supervisory Capital Assessment Program, or (“SCAP”), and the Public-Private Investment Program, or (“PPIP”), which are described in greater detail in Part II, “Item 1A — Risk Factors”.

New Markets Tax Credit Award

In June 2006, the Bank was selected by the U.S. Department of Treasury, in a highly competitive process, to receive an award of $59 million in New Markets Tax Credits. The NMTC award is used to stimulate economic development in low- to moderate-income communities. The NMTC award enables the Bank to invest with community and development partners in economic development projects with attractive terms including, in some cases, below market interest rates, which may have the effect of attracting capital to underserved communities and facilitating the revitalization of the community, pursuant to the goals of the NMTC program. The NMTC award provides a credit to the Bank against Federal income taxes when the Bank makes qualified investments. The credits are allocated over seven years from the time of the qualified investment. In May 2009, the Bank received another award in the amount of $65 million NMTC. The Bank is currently considering various options as to how to utilize this award.

Recognition of the Bank’s $59.0 million NMTC award began in December 2006 when the Bank invested $29.5 million, one-half of its $59 million award. In December 2008, the Bank invested an additional $10.5 million and transferred rights to $19.2 million to an investor in a NMTC project. The Bank’s NMTC allocation was fully invested as of December 31, 2008. During the seven year period, assuming the Bank meets compliance requirements, the Bank will receive 39% of the $40.0 million invested award amount in tax benefits (5% over each of the first three years, and 6% over each of the next four years). The Company expects to receive the remaining NMTC tax benefits of approximately $9.1 million from its $40.0 million investment over the next five years. The Company’s ability to utilize deferred tax assets generated by NMTC income tax benefits over the next five years, as well as other deferred tax assets, depends on its ability to meet the NMTC compliance requirements and its ability to generate sufficient taxable income from operations or from potential tax strategies to generate taxable income in the future.

With the Bank’s most recent NMTC award in May 2009, the utilization of this award allows the Bank to receive additional NMTC tax benefits of 39% on the $65.0 million directly invested, or approximately $25.4 million, over the next seven years.

Critical Accounting Policies

Note 1 to the Company’s audited Consolidated Financial Statements for fiscal year-end 2009 included in its 2009 Form 10-K, as supplemented by this report, contains a summary of significant accounting policies and is incorporated by reference. The Company believes its policies, with respect to the methodology for determining the allowance for loan losses, evaluation of realization of deferred tax assets and assessment of asset impairment judgments, including other than temporary declines in the value of the Company’s investment securities, involve a high degree of complexity and require management to make subjective judgments which often require assumptions or estimates about highly uncertain matters. Changes in these judgments, assumptions or estimates could cause reported results to differ materially. The following description of these policies should be read in conjunction with the corresponding section of the Company’s fiscal 2009 Form 10-K.

Allowance for Loan Losses

The allowance for loan losses is maintained at a level considered adequate to provide for probable loan losses inherent in the portfolio as of September 30, 2009. Management is responsible for determining the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses and the periodic provisioning for estimated losses included in the consolidated financial statements. The evaluation process is undertaken on a quarterly basis, but may increase in frequency should conditions arise that would require management’s prompt attention, such as business combinations and opportunities to dispose of non-performing and marginally performing loans by bulk sale or any development which may indicate an adverse trend.

The Bank maintains a loan review system, which includes periodic review of its loan portfolio and the early identification of potential problem loans. Such system takes into consideration, among other things, delinquency status, size of loans and type of collateral and financial condition of the borrowers. Loan loss allowances are established for problem loans based on a review of such information and/or appraisals of the underlying collateral. On the remainder of its loan portfolio, loan loss allowances are based upon a combination of factors including, but not limited to, actual loan loss experience, composition of loan portfolio, current economic conditions and management’s judgment. Although management believes that adequate loan loss allowances have been established, actual losses are dependent upon future events and, as such, further additions to the level of the loan loss allowance may be necessary in the future.

The methodology employed for assessing the appropriateness of the allowance consists of the following criteria:

	•		Establishment of loan loss allowance amounts for all specifically identified criticized and classified loans that have been designated as requiring attention by management’s internal loan review process, bank regulatory examinations or the Bank’s external auditors.

	•		An average loss factor, giving effect to historical loss experience over several years and other qualitative factors, is applied to all loans not subject to specific review.

•

Evaluation of any changes in risk profile brought about by business combinations, customer knowledge, the results of ongoing credit quality monitoring processes and the cyclical nature of economic and business conditions. An important consideration in performing this evaluation is the concentration of real estate related loans located in the New York City metropolitan area.

All new loan originations are assigned a credit risk grade which commences with loan officers and underwriters grading the quality of their loans one to five under a nine-category risk classification scale, the first five categories of which represent performing loans. Reserves are held based on actual loss factors based on several years of loss experience and other qualitative factors applied to the outstanding balances in each loan category. All loans are subject to continuous review and monitoring for changes in their credit grading. Grading that falls into criticized or classified categories (credit grading six through nine) are further evaluated and reserved amounts are established for each loan based on each loan’s potential for loss and includes consideration of the sufficiency of collateral. Any adverse trend in real estate markets could seriously affect underlying values available to protect against loss.

Other evidence used to support the amount of the allowance and its components includes:

	•		Amount and trend of criticized loans;

	•		Actual losses;

	•		Peer comparisons with other financial institutions; and

	•		Economic data associated with the real estate market in the Company’s lending market areas.

A loan is considered to be impaired, when it is probable that the Bank will be unable to collect all principal and interest amounts due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. The Bank tests loans for impairment if they are on non-accrual status or have been restructured. Consumer credit non-accrual loans are not tested for impairment because they are included in large groups of smaller-balance homogeneous loans that, by definition, are excluded from the scope of FASB accounting guidance. Impaired loans are required to be measured based upon (i) the present value of expected future cash flows, discounted at the loan’s initial effective interest rate, (ii) the loan’s market price, or (iii) fair value of the collateral if the loan is collateral dependent. If the loan valuation is less than the recorded value of the loan, an allowance must be established for the difference. The allowance is established by either an allocation of the existing allowance for loan losses or by a provision for loan losses, depending on various circumstances. Allowances are not needed when credit losses have been recorded so that the recorded investment in an impaired loan is less than the loan valuation.

Securities Impairment

The Bank’s available-for-sale securities portfolio is carried at estimated fair value, with any unrealized gains and losses, net of taxes, reported as accumulated other comprehensive income/loss in stockholders’ equity. Securities that the Bank has the positive intent and ability to hold to maturity are classified as held-to-maturity and are carried at amortized cost. The fair values of securities in the portfolio are based on published or securities dealers’ market values and are affected by changes in interest rates. On a quarterly basis the Bank reviews and evaluates the securities portfolio to determine if the decline in the fair value of any security below its cost basis is other-than-temporary. When a company intends to sell an investment security, the company recognizes an impairment loss equal to the full difference between amortized cost basis and fair value of that security. When the company does not intend to sell a security in an unrealized loss position, potential OTTI is considered based on a variety of factors, including the length of time and extent to which the fair value has been less than cost; adverse conditions specifically related to the industry, the geographic area or the financial condition of the issuer or the underlying collateral of a security; the payment structure of the security; changes to the rating of the security by a rating agency; the volatility of the fair value changes; and changes in fair value of the security after the balance sheet date. The Bank generally views changes in fair value caused by changes in interest rates as temporary, which is consistent with its experience. However, if such a decline is deemed to be other-than-temporary, the security is written down to a new cost basis and the credit related portion of the OTTI is charged to earnings with the non-credit related portion recorded in other comprehensive income. At September 30, 2009, the Bank does not have any securities that may be classified as having other than temporary impairment in its investment securities portfolio.

Deferred Income Taxes

The Company records income taxes in accordance with ASC 740, “Income Taxes,” as amended, using the asset and liability method. Accordingly, deferred tax assets and liabilities: (i) are recognized for the expected future tax consequences of events that have been recognized in the financial statements or tax returns; (ii) are attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases; and (iii) are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply in the years when those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled.

On a periodic basis, we assess whether it is more likely than not to be unrealizable, based on available evidence that a valuation allowance is required for any portions of deferred tax assets that we estimate are not likely to be realized. In assessing the need for a valuation allowance, we estimate future taxable income, considering the feasibility of tax planning strategies and the realizability of tax loss carry forwards. Valuation allowances related to deferred tax assets can be affected by changes to tax laws, statutory tax rates, and future taxable income levels. The valuation allowance is adjusted, by a charge or credit to income tax expense, as changes in facts and circumstances warrant.

Stock Repurchase Program

In August 2002, the Company’s Board of Directors authorized a stock repurchase program to acquire up to 231,635 shares of the Company’s outstanding common stock, or approximately 10 percent of the then outstanding shares. Through September 30, 2009, the Company purchased a total of 176,174 shares at an average price of $15.72. For the quarter ended September 30, 2009, the Company did not engage in stock repurchase transactions. Pursuant to Carver’s participation in the TARP CPP, the Company is prohibited from repurchasing shares of common stock without the Treasury’s prior consent until the third anniversary of the investment or until the senior preferred stock issued to the Treasury has been redeemed or transferred.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Liquidity is a measure of the Bank’s ability to generate adequate cash to meet its financial obligations. The principal cash requirements of a financial institution are to cover potential deposit outflows, fund increases in its loan and investment portfolios and ongoing operating expenses. The Bank’s primary sources of funds are deposits, borrowed funds and principal and interest payments on loans, mortgage-backed securities and investment securities. While maturities and scheduled amortization of loans, mortgage-backed securities and investment securities are predictable sources of funds, deposit flows and loan and mortgage-backed securities prepayments are strongly influenced by changes in general interest rates, economic conditions and competition.

The Bank monitors its liquidity utilizing guidelines that are contained in a policy developed by its management and approved by its Board of Directors. The Bank’s several liquidity measurements are evaluated on a frequent basis. The Bank was in compliance with this policy as of September 30, 2009. Management believes the Bank’s short-term assets have sufficient liquidity to cover loan demand, potential fluctuations in deposit accounts and to meet other anticipated cash requirements. Additionally, the Bank has other sources of liquidity including the ability to borrow from the FHLB-NY utilizing unpledged mortgage-backed securities and certain mortgage loans, the sale of available-for-sale securities and the sale of certain mortgage loans. At September 30, 2009, based on available collateral held at the FHLB-NY, the Bank had the ability to borrow from the FHLB-NY an additional $31.2 million on a secured basis, utilizing mortgage-related loans and securities as collateral.

The unaudited Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows present the change in cash from operating, investing and financing activities. During the quarter ended September 30, 2009, total cash and cash equivalents increased by $1.1 million reflecting cash used in operating activities of $0.3 million, cash used in investing activities of $13.9 million, which was more than offset by cash provided by financing activities of $15.3 million..

Net cash used in investing activities was $13.9 million, primarily representing cash disbursed to fund loan originations of $72.9 million, offset partially by principal collections on loans of $49.5 million and proceeds from principal payments/maturities/calls of securities of $9.6 million. Net cash provided by financing activities was $15.3 million and primarily resulted from increases in deposits of $1.3 million and borrowings of $15.0 million. Net cash used in operating activities during this period was $0.3 million, primarily representing net income, provision for loan losses and an increase in other assets.

The levels of the Bank’s short-term liquid assets are dependent on the Bank’s operating, investing and financing activities during any given period. The most significant liquidity challenge the Bank faces is variability in its cash flows as a result of mortgage refinance activity. When mortgage interest rates decline, customers’ refinance activities tend to accelerate, causing the cash flow from both the mortgage loan portfolio and the mortgage-backed securities portfolio to accelerate. In contrast, when mortgage interest rates increase, refinance activities tend to slow, causing a reduction of liquidity. However, in a rising rate environment, customers generally tend to prefer fixed rate mortgage loan products over variable rate products.

The OTS requires that the Bank meet the minimum capital requirements. Capital adequacy is one of the most important factors used to determine the safety and soundness of individual banks and the banking system. The minimum regulatory requirements are a tangible capital ratio of 1.50%, leverage capital ratio of 4.00% and total risk-based capital ratio of 8.00%.

At September 30, 2009, the Bank exceeded all regulatory minimum capital requirements and qualified, under OTS regulations, as a well-capitalized institution. The table below presents the capital position of the Bank at September 30, 2009 (dollars in thousands):


	GAAP		Tangible			Leverage			Risk-Based
	Capital		Equity			Capital			Capital

Stockholders’ Equity at September 30, 2009 ⁽¹⁾	$	78,093	$	78,093		$	78,093		$	78,093


Add:
General valuation allowances				—			—			8,123
Other				218			218			218
Deduct:
Disallowed deferred tax assets				9,051			9,051			9,051
Unrealized gains on securities available-for-sale, net				601			601			601
Goodwill and qualifying intangible assets, net				304			304			304

Regulatory Capital				68,355			68,355			76,478
Minimum Capital requirement				11,988			31,969			53,425

Regulatory Capital Excess			$	56,367		$	36,386		$	23,053


Capital Ratios				8.54	%		8.55	%		11.45	%

The OTS capital adequacy guidelines requires certain exclusions as noted in the OTS Capital Requirements in arriving at Tangible capital, Core or Leverage capital and Risk-based capital. Accordingly, the Bank has adjusted its capital position as of March 31, 2009 to exclude net deferred tax assets from its capital. The Bank exceeded all regulatory minimum capital requirements, under OTS regulations, as a well-capitalized institution. The table below presents the restated capital position of the Bank at March 31, 2009 (dollars in thousands):


	GAAP		Tangible			Leverage			Risk-Based
	Capital		Equity			Capital			Capital
Stockholders’ Equity at March 31, 2009	$	77,634	$	77,634		$	77,634		$	77,634


Add:
General valuation allowances				—			—			7,049
Other				218			218			218
Deduct:
Disallowed deferred tax assets				9,426			9,426			9,426
Unrealized gains on securities available-for-sale, net				200			200			200
Goodwill and qualifying intangible assets, net				380			380			380

Regulatory Capital				67,846			67,846			74,895
Minimum Capital requirement				12,038			32,103			52,023

Regulatory Capital Excess			$	55,808		$	35,743		$	22,872


Capital Ratios				8.44	%		8.45	%		11.52	%

Comparison of Financial Condition at September 30, 2009 and March 31, 2009

Assets

At September 30, 2009, total assets increased $17.2 million, or 2.2%, to $808.6 million compared to $791.4 million at March 31, 2009, primarily as a result of increases in cash and cash equivalents of $1.1 million, loans receivable of $25.5 million and other assets of $3.5 million primarily due to increases in accounts receivables and loan clearing accounts, offset by decreases in investment securities of $9.9 million and loans held-for-sale of $1.5 million.

Cash and cash equivalents increased $1.1 million, or 8.1%, to $14.4 million at September 30, 2009 compared to $13.3 million at March 31, 2009, primarily due to an increase of $5.3 million in cash and due from banks offset by a decrease of $4.2 million in money market investments. The increase in cash and cash equivalents is the result of liquidity stemming partially from principal pay down of investment securities.

Investment securities decreased $9.9 million, or 13.2%, to $64.9 million at September 30, 2009 compared to $74.8 million at March 31, 2009, reflecting decreases of $7.9 million in available-for-sale securities and a $2.0 million decrease in held-to-maturity securities. The decrease in both available-for-sale and held to maturity securities was primarily due to collection of principal repayments and maturities. The liquidity arising from the decrease in investment securities was partially used to fund loan demand. However, the Bank may invest in securities from time to time to help diversify its investment portfolio, manage liquidity and satisfy collateral requirements for certain deposits. There were no purchases of securities during the quarter ended September 30, 2009.

Loans held-for-sale decreased $1.5 million, or 7.3%, to $19.6 million at September 30, 2009 compared to $21.1 million at March 31, 2009. The decrease resulted from principal repayments and a mark to market adjustment.

Loans receivable increased $25.5 million, or 4.0%, to $666.6 million at September 30, 2009 compared to $641.1 million at March 31, 2009. The increase was primarily the result of increases in multifamily loans of $16.9 million, commercial real estate loans of $15.8 million and commercial business loans of $12.8 million, offset by decreases in one- to four- family loans of $7.1 million, construction loans of $12.7 million and consumer loans of $0.2 million. The Bank continues to grow its loan portfolio through focusing on origination of loans in the markets it serves while maintaining tighter credit standards.

At September 30, 2009, construction loans represented 19.7% of the Bank’s total loan portfolio. Approximately 70% of the Bank’s construction loans are participations in loans originated by Community Preservation Corporation (“CPC”). CPC is a non-profit mortgage lender whose mission is to enhance the quality and quantity of affordable housing in the New York, New Jersey, and Connecticut tri-state area. The Bank’s construction lending activity is concentrated in the New York City market. In addition to real estate collateral, security for these loans consist of a personal guarantee of the developer, 20% top loss guarantee by CPC, and a rental conversion option which allows completed and leased developments to be sold to the NYC Pension FUND. See the Company’s Form 10-K for further details.

Although the New York City real estate market has been more resilient than other real estate markets in certain parts of the U.S., the local economic environment is experiencing significant unemployment, led by job losses on Wall Street and continued constraint in credit markets. During the quarter ended September 30, 2009, local real estate market indicators showed increasing inventories, longer marketing periods for sales, and price reductions. The Bank will continue to closely monitor these and other relevant trends.

Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity

Total liabilities increased $16.2 million, or 2.2%, to $743.3 million at September 30, 2009 compared to $727.1 million at March 31, 2009. The increase in total liabilities was primarily the result of increases in total deposits of $1.3 million and FHLB-NY advances and other borrowed money of $14.9 million.

Deposits increased $1.3 million, or 0.2%, to $604.7 million at September 30, 2009 compared to $603.4 million at March 31, 2009. The increase in deposit balances was primarily the result of increases in money market deposits of $2.8 million, NOW deposits of $0.9 million and certificates of deposit of $0.3 million, which were partially offset by decreases in savings deposits of $1.2 million and non-interest bearing checking of $1.5 million.

Advances from the FHLB-NY and other borrowed money increased $14.9 million, or 13.0%, to $130.0 million at September 30, 2009 compared to $115.1 million at March 31, 2009. The increase in advances and other borrowed money was primarily the result of an increase in FHLB-NY advances which were used to fund loan growth. At September 30, 2009, based on available collateral held at the FHLB-NY, the Bank had the ability to borrow an additional $31.2 million on a secured basis from the FHLB-NY.

Total stockholders’ equity increased $1.0 million, or 1.6%, to $65.3 million at September 30, 2009 compared to $64.3 million at March 31, 2009. The increase in total stockholders’ equity was primarily attributable to net income for the six months ended September 30, 2009 totaling $1.5 million, partially offset by dividends paid of $0.9 million and an increase in accumulated other comprehensive income of $0.4 million. The Bank’s capital levels meet regulatory requirements of a well-capitalized financial institution.

Asset/Liability Management

The Company’s primary earnings source is net interest income, which is affected by changes in the level of interest rates, the relationship between the rates on interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities, the impact of interest rate fluctuations on asset prepayments, the level and composition of deposits and the credit quality of earning assets. Management’s asset/liability objectives are to maintain a strong, stable net interest margin, to utilize its capital effectively without taking undue risks, to maintain adequate liquidity and to manage its exposure to changes in interest rates.

The economic environment is uncertain regarding future interest rate trends. Management regularly monitors the Company’s cumulative gap position, which is the difference between the sensitivity to rate changes on the Company’s interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities. In addition, the Company uses various tools to monitor and manage interest rate risk, such as a model that projects net interest income based on increasing or decreasing interest rates.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements and Contractual Obligations

The Bank is a party to financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk in the normal course of business in order to meet the financing needs of its customers and in connection with its overall investment strategy. These instruments involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit, interest rate and liquidity risk. In accordance with GAAP, these instruments are not recorded in the consolidated financial statements. Such instruments primarily include lending obligations, including commitments to originate mortgage and consumer loans and to fund unused lines of credit.

The following table reflects the outstanding loan commitments as of September 30, 2009 (in thousands):


Commitments to fund construction mortgage loans	$	38,380
Commitments to fund commercial and consumer loans		6,150
Lines of credit		7,660
Letters of credit		4,154

	$	56,344

Comparison of Operating Results for the Three and Six Months Ended September 30, 2009 and 2008

Overview

The Company reported consolidated net income of $0.8 million and diluted earnings per share of $0.23 for the quarter ended September 30, 2009 compared to net income of $0.6 million and diluted earnings per share of $0.25 for the prior year period. Net income for the six months ended September 30, 2009 was $1.5 million and diluted earnings per share were $0.41 compared to net interest income of $1.3 million and diluted earnings per share of $0.52 for the prior year period. Net income for both the three- and six-month periods ended September 30, 2009 increased $0.2 million, primarily as a result of decreases in net interest income and non-interest expense, offset by an increase in provision for loan losses coupled with decreases in non-interest income and income tax benefit. Earnings per share during fiscal 2010 are impacted by the payment of preferred dividends pursuant to Carver’s participation in the U.S. Treasury Department’s Troubled Asset Relief Program’s Capital Purchase Program (“TARP”).

The following table reflects the selected operating ratios for the three and six months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008:

CARVER BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
SELECTED KEY RATIOS
(Unaudited)


	Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended
Selected Financial Data:		September 30,						September 30,
	2009			2008			2009			2008
Return on average assets (1)		0.41	%		0.31	%		0.38	%		0.33	%
Return on average equity (2)		5.02			4.56			4.74			4.82
Net interest margin (3)		4.12			3.48			3.91			3.50
Interest rate spread (4)		3.96			3.29			3.73			3.29
Efficiency ratio (5)		77.67			94.00			82.44			92.79
Operating expenses to average assets (6)		3.44			3.69			3.49			3.71
Average equity to average assets (7)		8.09			6.89			7.96			6.86
Average interest-earning assets to average interest-bearing liabilities		1.12	x		1.08	x		1.12	x		1.09	x


(1)		Net income, annualized, divided by average total assets.

(2)		Net income, annualized, divided by average total equity.

(3)		Net interest income, annualized, divided by average interest-earning assets.

(4)		Combined weighted average interest rate earned less combined weighted average interest rate cost.

(5)		Operating expenses divided by sum of net interest income plus non-interest income.

(6)		Non-interest expenses less loss on real estate owned, annualized, divided by average total assets.

(7)		Total average equity divided by total average assets for the period.

Analysis of Net Interest Income

The Company’s profitability is primarily dependent upon net interest income and further affected by provisions for loan losses, non-interest income, non-interest expense and income taxes. Net interest income represents the difference between income on interest-earning assets and expense on interest-bearing liabilities. Net interest income depends primarily upon the volume of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities and the corresponding interest rates earned and paid. The Company’s net interest income is significantly impacted by changes in interest rate and market yield curves.

Net interest income before the provision for loan losses increased $1.6 million, or 25.5%, to $7.8 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2009 compared to $6.2 million for the prior year period. This increase was a result of a decrease in the yield on average interest-earning assets of 35 basis points coupled with a decrease in the yield on interest-bearing liabilities of 102 basis points. Although the average balances for both the interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities increased for the quarter, resulting yields declined due to the lower interest rate environment. The average interest rate spread increased 67 basis points to 3.96% for the quarter ended September 30, 2009 compared to 3.29% for the prior year period. The net interest margin increased to 4.12% for the quarter ended September 30, 2009 compared to 3.48% for the prior year period.

For the six month period ending September 30, 2009, net interest income before the provision for loan losses increased by $2.2 million, or 17.7%, to $14.7 million, compared to $12.4 million for the prior year period. Net interest margin for the six month period ending September 30, 2009, increased 41 basis points to 3.91% compared to 3.50% for the prior year period.

The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, certain information about average balances of The Company’s interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities and their related average yields and the average costs for the three and six months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008. Average yields are derived by dividing annualized income or expense by the average balances of assets or liabilities, respectively, for the periods shown. Average balances are derived from daily or month-end balances as available. Management does not believe that the use of average monthly balances instead of average daily balances represents a material difference in information presented. The average balance of loans includes loans on which the Company has discontinued accruing interest. The yield and cost include fees, which are considered adjustments to yields.

CARVER BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED AVERAGE BALANCES
(In thousands)
(Unaudited)


	For the Three Months Ended September 30,
	2009							2008
	Average				Average			Average				Average
	Balance		Interest		Yield/Cost			Balance		Interest		Yield/Cost

Interest Earning Assets:
Loans (1)	$	683,208	$	9,689		5.67	%	$	660,058	$	9,840		5.96	%
Mortgage-backed securities		66,689		688		4.12	%		46,013		603		5.24	%
Investment securities (2)		5,008		129		10.21	%		6,190		98		6.28	%
Other investments and federal funds sold		1,017		2		0.73	%		691		2		0.92	%

Total interest-earning assets		755,922		10,507		5.56	%		712,952		10,543		5.91	%
Non-interest-earning assets		50,920							78,219

Total assets	$	806,843						$	791,171


Interest Bearing Liabilities:
Deposits:
Now demand	$	49,900		19		0.15	%	$	23,326		16		0.27	%
Savings and clubs		117,820		65		0.22	%		121,800		163		0.53	%
Money market		46,697		155		1.32	%		44,732		223		1.98	%
Certificates of deposit		332,723		1,529		1.82	%		368,883		2,949		3.17	%
Mortgagors deposits		2,286		9		1.60	%		2,386		10		1.66	%

Total deposits		549,426		1,777		1.28	%		561,127		3,361		2.38	%
Borrowed money		125,114		951		3.01	%		97,248		981		4.00	%

Total interest-bearing liabilities		674,540		2,728		1.60	%		658,375		4,342		2.62	%
Non-interest-bearing liabilities:
Demand		58,517							52,777
Other liabilities		8,551							6,339

Total liabilities		741,608							717,491
Minority Interest		—							19,150
Stockholders’ equity		65,235							54,530

Total liabilities & stockholders’ equity	$	806,843						$	791,171

Net interest income			$	7,779						$	6,201


Average interest rate spread						3.96	%						3.29	%


Net interest margin						4.12	%						3.48	%


(1)		Includes non-accrual loans

(2)		Includes FHLB-NY stock

CARVER BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED AVERAGE BALANCES
(In thousands)
(Unaudited)


	Six months ended September 30,
	2009							2008
	Average				Average			Average				Average
	Balance		Interest		Yield/Cost			Balance		Interest		Yield/Cost

Interest Earning Assets:
Loans (1)	$	675,263	$	18,789		5.56	%	$	657,295	$	20,293		6.17	%
Mortgage-backed securities		69,262		1,431		4.13	%		44,740		1,165		5.21	%
Investment securities (2)		4,901		194		7.89	%		5,427		170		6.25	%
Other investments and federal funds sold		1,023		7		1.36	%		4,077		40		1.96	%

Total interest-earning assets		750,449		20,420		5.44	%		711,539		21,668		6.09	%
Non-interest-earning assets		50,986							78,406

Total assets	$	801,434						$	789,945


Interest Bearing Liabilities:
Deposits:
Now demand	$	52,025		41		0.16	%	$	23,776		35		0.29	%
Savings and clubs		118,526		131		0.22	%		123,638		330		0.53	%
Money market		45,194		302		1.33	%		45,477		519		2.28	%
Certificates of deposit		329,187		3,320		2.01	%		379,885		6,592		3.46	%
Mortgagors deposits		2,587		21		1.60	%		2,847		24		1.68	%

Total deposits		547,519		3,815		1.39	%		575,623		7,500		2.60	%
Borrowed money		122,708		1,936		3.15	%		79,853		1,709		4.27	%

Total interest-bearing liabilities		670,227		5,751		1.71	%		655,476		9,209		2.80	%
Non-interest-bearing liabilities:
Demand		59,237							53,215
Other liabilities		8,184							7,892

Total liabilities		737,648							716,583
Minority Interest		—							19,150
Stockholders’ equity		63,786							54,212

Total liabilities & stockholders’ equity	$	801,434						$	789,945

Net interest income			$	14,669						$	12,459


Average interest rate spread						3.73	%						3.29	%


Net interest margin						3.91	%						3.50	%


(1)		Includes non-accrual loans

(2)		Includes FHLB-NY stock

Interest Income

Interest income decreased moderately to $10.5 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2009 compared to $10.6 million for the prior year period. The decrease in interest income was primarily the result of a decrease in interest income on loans of $0.2 million, offset in part by a $0.1 million increase in interest income on mortgage-backed securities. The decrease in interest income reflects a decrease in the yield on interest-earning assets of 35 basis points to 5.56%, compared to 5.91% for the prior year period. The yield on loans decreased 29 basis points while the average loan balance increased $23.2 million. The yield on mortgage-backed securities declined 112 basis points, while the average balance increased $20.7 million. The decline in yield on interest-earning assets is a result of the low interest rate environment and overall market conditions.

For the six month period ending September 30, 2009, interest income decreased $1.2 million, or 5.8%, to $20.4 million, compared to $21.6 million for the prior year period. Of the total decrease in interest income, loan income declined $1.5 million or 7.4% while the income on mortgage backed securities increased $0.3 million or 22.8%. The decrease in interest income on loans reflects a decrease in the yield on loans of 61 basis points to 5.56% for the six months ended September 30, 2009 compared to 6.17% for the prior year period.

The decrease in interest income on loans for both the three- and six-month periods ended September 30, 2009 compared to prior year periods resulted primarily from lower yields on the repricing of loans tied to Libor and Prime rate indices, which have fallen substantially year over year, offset in part by increases in average loan balances of $23.2 million and $18.0 million for the three- and six-month periods ended September 30, 2009, respectively, compared to the prior year periods.

The increase in interest income on mortgage-backed securities resulted from an increase in average balances of $20.7 million and $24.5 million, for the three- and six-month periods ended September 30, 2009, respectively, compared to the prior year periods, offset by a decline in yield of 112 basis points and 108 basis points for the three- and six-month periods ended September 30, 3009, respectively, compared to the prior year periods.

Interest Expense

Interest expense decreased by $1.6 million, or 37.2%, to $2.7 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2009 compared to $4.3 million for the prior year period. The decrease in interest expense was primarily the result of a decrease in interest expense on deposits of $1.6 million. The decrease in interest expense reflects a decline of 102 basis points in the average cost of interest-bearing liabilities to 1.60% compared to 2.62% for the prior year period, while the average balance of interest-bearing liabilities increased by $16.2 million to $674.5 million compared to $658.4 million for the prior year period. The decrease in yield on interest-bearing liabilities was primarily the result of relatively higher cost certificates of deposits repricing at lower rates as well as lower costs on core deposits and short-term advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank of New York (“FHLB-NY”).

For the six month period ended September 30, 2009, interest expense decreased by $3.5 million, or 37.6%, to $5.8 million, compared to $9.2 million for the prior year period. The decrease in interest expense resulted primarily from a 109 basis point decrease in the annualized average cost of interest-bearing liabilities to 1.71%, compared to 2.80% for the prior year period, offset partially by growth in the average balance of interest-bearing liabilities of $14.8 million, or 2.3%, to $670.2 million compared to $655.5 million for the prior year period. Total interest expense on deposits decreased $3.7 million, or 49.1%, to $3.8 million from $7.5 million for the prior year period. The decrease reflects a 121 basis point reduction in the average cost of total deposits to 1.39% compared to 2.60% for the prior year period, coupled with a decrease in the average balance of total deposits of $28.1 million to $547.5 million for the six months ended September 30, 2009 compared to $575.6 million for the prior year period.

Interest expense on borrowed money increased $0.2 million, or 13.3%, to $1.9 million for the six months ended September 30, 2009 compared to $1.7 million for the prior year period. The increase in interest expense primarily reflects an increase in the average balance of total borrowed money outstanding of $122.7 million for the six months ended September 30, 2009, compared to $79.9 million for the prior year period, offset by a 112 basis point reduction in the average cost of borrowed money to 3.15% for the six months ended September 30, 2009 compared to 4.27% for the prior year period.

Provision for Loan Losses and Asset Quality

The Bank maintains an allowance for loan losses that management believes is sufficient to absorb inherent losses in its loan portfolio. The adequacy of the allowance for loan and lease losses (“ALLL”) is determined by management’s continuing review of the Bank’s loan portfolio, which includes identification and review of individual factors that may affect a borrower’s ability to repay. Management reviews overall portfolio quality through an analysis of delinquency and non-performing loan data, estimates of the value of underlying collateral and current charge-offs. A review of regulatory examinations, an assessment of current and expected economic conditions and changes in the size and composition of the loan portfolio are all taken into consideration. The ALLL reflects management’s evaluation of the loans presenting identified loss potential as well as the risk inherent in various components of the portfolio. As such, an increase in the size of the portfolio or any of its components could necessitate an increase in the ALLL even though there may not be a decline in credit quality or an increase in potential problem loans.

The Bank’s provision for loan loss methodology is consistent with the Interagency Policy Statement on the Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses (the “Interagency Policy Statement”) released by the Federal Financial Regulatory Agencies on December 13, 2006. For additional information regarding the Bank’s ALLL policy, refer to Note 2 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” included in the Holding Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2009.

The following table summarizes the activity in allowance for loan losses for the six month period ended September 30, 2009 and fiscal year-end March 31, 2009 (dollars in thousands):


	Six Months
	Ended
	September 30,			Fiscal Year-End
	2009			March 31, 2009

Beginning Balance	$	7,049		$	4,878

Less charge-offs:
Business		(510	)		(501	)
Consumer and other		(453	)		(83	)

Total Charge- Offs:		(963	)		(584	)

Add Recoveries:
Business		4			10
Consumer and other		30			43

Total Recoveries:		34			53

Provision for Loan Losses		2,003			2,702


Ending Balance	$	8,123		$	7,049


Ratios:
Net charge-offs to average loans outstanding		0.14	%		0.08	%
Allowance to total loans		1.22	%		1.06	%
Allowance to non-performing loans (1)		29.22	%		27.40	%


(1)		Non-performing loans consist of non-accrual loans and accruing loans 90 days or more past due in settlement of loans.

The Bank provided $1.3 million in loan loss provision for the second quarter of fiscal 2010, an increase of $1.1 million compared to $0.2 million provision in the prior year period. The increase in provision reflects the potential risk of further loan deterioration resulting from a continued and prolonged downturn in the U.S. economy and in particular the New York City economy. The Bank’s future level of non-performing loans will be influenced by economic conditions, including the impact of those conditions on the Bank’s customers, interest rates and other factors existing at the time.

For the six month period ended September 30, 2009, the Bank provided $2.0 million in provision for loan losses compared with $0.3 million for the prior year period. The increased provision reflects indications of deterioration in housing and real estate markets, as well as the overall economic environment. Based on management’s evaluation of housing and real estate markets and the overall economy, coupled with the composition of our delinquencies, non-performing loans, net loan charge-offs and overall loan portfolio, we determined that a $2.0 million provision for loan losses was warranted for the six months ended September 30, 2009.

At September 30, 2009 and March 31, 2009, the Bank’s allowance for loan losses was $8.1 million and $7.0 million, respectively. The ratio of the allowance for loan losses to non-performing loans was 29.22% at September 30, 2009 compared to 26.48% at March 31, 2009. The ratio of the allowance for loan losses to total loans was 1.22% at September 30, 2009 compared to 1.10% at March 31, 2009.

Non-performing Assets.

When a borrower fails to make a payment on a loan, immediate steps are taken by the Bank and its sub-servicers to have the delinquency cured and the loan restored to current status. With respect to mortgage loans, once the payment grace period has expired (in most instances 15 days after the due date), a late notice is mailed to the borrower within two business days and a late charge is imposed, if applicable. If payment is not promptly received, the borrower is contacted by telephone and efforts are made to formulate an affirmative plan to cure the delinquency. Additional calls are made by the 20th and 25th day of the delinquency. If a mortgage loan becomes 30 days delinquent, a letter is mailed to the borrower requesting payment by a specified date. If a mortgage loan becomes 60 days delinquent, the Bank seeks to make personal contact with the borrower and also has the property inspected. If a mortgage becomes 90 days delinquent, a letter is sent to the borrower demanding payment by a certain date and indicating that a foreclosure suit will be filed if the deadline is not met. If payment is still not made, the Bank may pursue foreclosure or other appropriate action. In the case of business loans the collection process is similar. The Bank may pursue foreclosure or other appropriate action for business loans secured by real estate. For business loans not secured by real estate, the Bank may seek the SBA guarantee or other appropriate action.

When a borrower fails to make a payment on a consumer loan, steps are taken by the Bank’s loan servicing department to have the delinquency cured and the loan restored to current status. A late notice is mailed to the borrower immediately and a late charge is imposed, if applicable, once the payment grace period has expired (15 days after the due date). If payment is not promptly received, the borrower is contacted by telephone, and efforts are made to formulate an affirmative plan to cure the delinquency. If a consumer loan becomes 30 days delinquent, a letter is mailed to the borrower requesting payment by a specified date. If the loan becomes 60 days delinquent, the account is given to an independent collection agency to follow up with the collection of the account. If the loan becomes 90 days delinquent, a final warning letter is sent to the borrower and any co-borrower. If the loan remains delinquent, it is reviewed for charge-off. The Bank’s collection efforts continue after the loan is charged off, except when a determination is made that collection efforts have been exhausted or are not productive.

At September 30, 2009, non-performing loans totaled $27.8 million, or 4.17% of total loans receivable compared to $26.6 million, or 4.15% of total loans receivable at March 31, 2009. Non-performing assets totaled $27.9 million, or 3.45% of total assets compared to $27.1 million, or 3.42% of total assets at March 31, 2009. Non-performing assets include loans 90 days past due, non-accrual loans and other real estate owned. The Company’s future levels of non-performing loans will be influenced by economic conditions, including the impact of those conditions on the Company’s customers, interest rates and other internal and external factors existing at the time.

The following table sets forth information with respect to the Bank’s non-performing assets for the past five quarter end periods (dollars in thousands):


	September			June			March			December			September
	2009			2009			2009			2008			2008
Loans accounted for on a non-accrual basis (1):
Gross loans receivable:
One- to four-family	$	3,297		$	6,598		$	4,396		$	3,185		$	1,671
Multifamily		5,988			3,978			3,569			—			—
Non-residential		4,933			7,963			11,375			6,550			10,424
Construction		9,808			3,750			3,286			—			3,157
Business		2,760			2,801			3,079			3,907			2,185
Consumer		31			3			22			46			20

Total non-accrual loans		26,817			25,093			25,727			13,688			17,457


Accruing loans contractually past due > 90 days (2)		987			1,388			894			25			9,349

Total non-performing loans (non-accrual & accruing loans past due > 90 days)		27,804			26,481			26,621			13,713			26,806

Other non-performing assets (3):
Real estate owned		67			162			465			610			635

Total other non-performing assets		67			162			465			610			635

Total non-performing assets (4)	$	27,871		$	26,643		$	27,086		$	14,323		$	27,441


Non-performing loans to total loans		4.17	%		4.02	%		4.15	%		2.15	%		4.22	%
Non-performing assets to total assets		3.45	%		3.29	%		3.42	%		1.81	%		3.47	%


(1)		Non-accrual status denotes any loan where the delinquency exceeds 90 days past due and in the opinion of management the collection of additional interest is doubtful. Payments received on a non-accrual loan are either applied to the outstanding principal balance or recorded as interest income, depending on assessment of the ability to collect on the loan

(2)		This category represent loans that are 90 days or more past maturity that are current with respect to principal and interest payments.

(3)		Other non-performing assets generally represent property acquired by the Bank in settlement of loans (i.e., through foreclosure, repossession or as an in-substance foreclosure). These assets are recorded at the lower of their fair value or the cost to acquire.

(4)		Total non-performing assets consist of non-accrual loans, accruing loans 90 days or more past due and property acquired in settlement of loans.

Subprime Loans

On July 10, 2008, the OTS and other Federal bank regulatory authorities (the “Agencies”) published the final Interagency Statement on Subprime Lending (the “Statement”) to address emerging issues and questions relating to certain subprime mortgage lending practices. Although the Agencies did not provide a specific definition of a “subprime” loan in the Statement, the Statement did highlight the Agencies’ concerns with certain adjustable-rate mortgage products offered to subprime borrowers that have one or more of the following characteristics:

	•		Low initial payments based on a fixed introductory rate that expires after a short period and then adjusts to a variable index rate plus a margin for the remaining term of the loan;

	•		Very high or no limits on how much the payment amount or the interest rate may increase (“payment or rate caps”) on reset dates;

	•		Limited or no documentation of borrowers’ income;

	•		Product features likely to result in frequent refinancing to maintain an affordable monthly payment; and/or

	•		Substantial prepayment penalties and/or prepayment penalties that extend beyond the initial fixed interest rate period.

In the 2001 Expanded Guidance for Subprime Lending Programs, the Agencies determined that, generally, subprime borrowers will display a range of credit risk characteristics that may include one or more of the following:

	•		Two or more 30-day delinquencies in the last 12 months, or one or more 60-day delinquencies in the last 24 months;

	•		Judgment, foreclosure, repossession, or charge-off in the prior 24 months;

	•		Bankruptcy in the last 5 years;

	•		Relatively high default probability as evidenced by, for example, a credit bureau risk score (FICO) of 660 or below (depending on the product/collateral), or other bureau or proprietary scores with an equivalent default probability likelihood; and/or

	•		Debt service-to-income ratio of 50% or greater, or otherwise limited ability to cover family living expenses after deducting total monthly debt-service requirements from monthly income.

The Bank has minimal exposure to the subprime loan market and, therefore, it does not expect the Statement to have a material impact on the Company. At September 30, 2009, the Bank’s loan portfolio contained $8.7 million in loans that it considers subprime, all of which were performing loans.

Non-Interest Income

Non-interest income decreased by $0.4 million, or 26.6%, to $1.2 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2009 compared to $1.6 million for the prior year period. The decrease was due to a decline in other income of $0.4 million driven mainly by the mark to market adjustment on loans held-for-sale of $0.3 million and consolidation of income from a minority interest created by the NMTC transaction recorded in the prior year of $0.1 million.

During the six month period ended September 30, 2009, non-interest income decreased $1.0 million, or 30.5% to $2.3 million compared to $3.3 million for the prior year period. Of the total decrease, other income decreased by $0.8 million, primarily due to a $0.4 million consolidation of income from the minority interest created by the NMTC transaction recorded in the prior year period, a $0.3 million in mark to market adjustment on loans held-for-sale, and a decrease of loan fees and service charges of $0.2 million, partially offset by an increase of $0.1 million in depository fees and charges.

Non-Interest Expense

Non-interest expense decreased by $0.3 million, or 4.3%, to $7.0 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2009 compared to $7.3 million for the prior year period. The decrease was primarily due to decreases in employee compensation and benefits of $0.4 million, equipment expense of $0.3 million and consulting expense of $0.1 million, partially offset by increases in net occupancy expense of $0.3 million, FDIC’s insurance premiums of $0.1 million and other expenses of $0.1 million. The decrease in non-interest expense resulted from management’s continued focus on expense reduction initiatives.

Non-interest expense decreased $0.6 million or 4.0%, to $14.0 million for the six month period ended September 30, 2009, compared to $14.6 million for the prior year period. The decrease reflects management’s cost reduction strategy which resulted in a decline of employee compensation and benefits of $0.7 million, vendor expenses of $0.3 million, and other expenses of $0.6 million. The decrease in other expenses resulted from reductions in marketing and advertising expense of $0.4 million and retail charge-offs of $0.2 million. These reductions were partially offset by increases in net occupancy expense of $0.2 million and a FDIC’s insurance assessment of $0.9 million, following higher deposit insurance premiums and industry-wide special assessments.

Income Tax Benefit

The income tax benefit was $0.1 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2009 compared to a tax benefit of $0.4 million for the prior year period. The tax benefit for the quarter ended September 30, 2009 reflects income tax expense of $0.4 million offset by the tax benefit generated by the NMTC transaction totaling $0.5 million. The Company expects to receive additional NMTC tax benefits of approximately $11.6 million through the period ending March 31, 2014, from its $40.0 million investment. The Company’s ability to utilize deferred tax assets generated by NMTC income tax benefits over the next five years, as well as other deferred tax assets, depends on its ability to meet the NMTC compliance requirements and its ability to generate sufficient taxable income from operations or from potential tax strategies to generate taxable income in the future.

For the six month period ended September 30, 2009, the Bank recorded a tax benefit of $0.5 million compared to $0.7 million for the prior year period. The tax benefit for the six months ended September 30, 2009 reflects income before taxes of $1.0 million which resulted in income tax expense of $0.5 million offset by the tax benefit generated by the NMTC investment totaling $1.0 million. During the prior year period, income before taxes of $0.8 million resulted in income tax expense of $0.3 million offset by the tax benefit generated by the NMTC investment totaling $0.7 million.

ITEM 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure about Market Risk

Quantitative and qualitative disclosure about market risk is presented at March 31, 2009 in Item 7A of the Company’s 2009 Form 10-K and is incorporated herein by reference. The Company believes that there has been no material change in the Company’s market risk at September 30, 2009 compared to March 31, 2009.

ITEM 4. Controls and Procedures

(a) Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

The Company maintains controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports that the Company files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the rules and forms of the Securities and Exchange Commission. As of September 30, 2009, the Company’s management, including the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act), as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based upon that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Principal Accounting Officer concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the end of the period covered by this report.

Disclosure controls and procedures are the controls and other procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports that the Company files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports that the Company files or submits under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

(b) Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

There have not been any changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) during the fiscal quarter to which this report relates that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1. Legal Proceedings

Disclosure regarding legal proceedings to which the Company is a party is presented in Note 14 to the audited Consolidated Financial Statements in the 2009 Form 10-K and is incorporated herein by reference. There have been no material changes with regard to such legal proceedings since the filing of the 2009 Form 10-K.

ITEM 1A. Risk Factors

The following risk factors represent material updates and additions to the risk factors previously disclosed in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2009 (“Form 10-K”). The risk factors below should be read in conjunction with the risk factors and other information disclosed in our Form 10-K. The risks described below and in our Form 10-K are not the only risks facing the Company. Additional risks not presently known to the Company, or that we currently deem immaterial, may also adversely affect the Company’s business, financial condition or results of operations.

Any future FDIC special assessments or increases in insurance premiums will adversely impact the Company’s earnings

On May 22, 2009, the FDIC adopted a final rule levying a five basis point special assessment on each insured depository institution’s assets minus Tier 1 capital as of June 30, 2009. The special assessment is payable on September 30, 2009. The Company recorded an expense of $327,000 during the quarter ended June 30, 2009, to reflect the special assessment. The final rule permits the FDIC’s Board of Directors to levy up to two additional special assessments of up to five basis points each during 2009 if the FDIC estimates that the Deposit Insurance Fund reserve ratio will fall to a level that the FDIC’s Board of Directors believes would adversely affect public confidence or to a level that will be close to or below zero. The FDIC has publicly announced that it is probable that it will levy an additional special assessment of up to five basis points later in 2009, the amount and timing of which are currently uncertain. Any further special assessments that the FDIC levies will be recorded as an expense during the appropriate period. In addition, the FDIC materially increased the general assessment rate and, therefore, the Company’s FDIC general insurance premium expense will increase substantially compared to prior periods.

In addition, on September 29, 2009, the FDIC issued a proposed rule pursuant to which all insured depository institutions would be required to prepay their estimated assessments for the fourth quarter of 2009, and for all of 2010, 2011 and 2012. Under the proposed rule, this pre-payment would be due on December 30, 2009. Under the proposed rule, the assessment rate for the fourth quarter of 2009 and for 2010 would be based on each institution’s total base assessment rate for the third quarter of 2009, modified to assume that the assessment rate in effect on September 30, 2009 had been in effect for the entire third quarter, and the assessment rate for 2011 and 2012 would be equal to the modified third quarter assessment rate plus an additional 3 basis points. In addition, each institution’s base assessment rate for each period would be calculated using its third quarter assessment base, adjusted quarterly for an estimated 5% annual growth rate in the assessment base through the end of 2012. If the proposed rule is passed, the Bank will be required to make a payment of approximately $4.1 million to the FDIC on December 30, 2009, and to record the payment as a prepaid expense, which will be amortized to expense over three years.

A legislative proposal has been introduced that would eliminate our primary federal regulator, require the Bank to convert to a national bank or state bank, and require the Company to become a bank holding company.

The U.S. Treasury Department recently released a legislative proposal that would implement sweeping changes to the current bank regulatory structure. The proposal would create a new federal banking regulator, the National Bank Supervisor, and merge our current primary federal regulator, the Office of Thrift Supervision, as well as the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (the primary federal regulator for national banks) into the new federal bank regulator. The proposal would also eliminate federal savings associations and require all federal savings associations, such as the Bank, to elect, within six months of the effective date of the legislation, to convert to a national bank, state bank or state savings association. A federal savings association that does not make the election would, by operation of law, is converted into a national bank within one year of the effective date of the legislation. If the Bank is required to convert to a national bank, the Company would become a bank holding company subject to supervision by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System as opposed to the Office of Thrift Supervision. As of the date of this quarterly report on Form 10-Q, the legislative proposals contained in the Treasury white paper, including its proposal to eliminate the federal savings association charter, have not been formally considered by either house of the U.S. Congress. Accordingly, it is not clear whether the proposal to eliminate the federal savings association charter will become law.


		Page
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1.	Financial Statements

	Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition as of September 30, 2009 (unaudited) and March 31, 2009		2

	Consolidated Statements of Income for the Three and Six Months Ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 (unaudited)		3

	Consolidated Statement of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity and Comprehensive Income for the Six Months Ended September 30, 2009 (unaudited)		4

	Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Six Months Ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 (unaudited)		5

	Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)		6

Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations		18

Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk		35

Item 4.	Controls and Procedures		35

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.	Legal Proceedings		36

Item 1A.	Risk Factors		36

Item 2.	Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities		37

Item 3.	Defaults Upon Senior Securities		37

Item 4.	Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders		37

Item 5.	Other Information		37

Item 6.	Exhibits		37

SIGNATURES			38

EXHIBITS			39
Exhibit 11.
Exhibit 31.1
Exhibit 31.2
Exhibit 32.1
Exhibit 32.2


Exhibit 11.		Computation of Earnings Per Share.

Exhibit 31.1		Certification of Chief Executive Officer.

Exhibit 31.2		Certification of Chief Accounting Officer.

Exhibit 32.1		Certification of Chief Executive Officer furnished pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350.

Exhibit 32.2		Certification of Chief Accounting Officer furnished pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350.


	CARVER BANCORP, INC.
Date: November 16, 2009	/s/ Deborah C. Wright
	Deborah C. Wright
	Chairman and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)


Date: November 16, 2009	/s/ Chris A. McFadden
	Chris A. McFadden
	Executive Vice President & Chief Financial Officer (Principal Accounting Officer)

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents