XML 49 R13.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.7.0.1
Loans Receivable, Net
6 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2017
Loans and Leases Receivable Disclosure [Abstract]  
LOANS RECEIVABLE, NET
LOANS RECEIVABLE, NET
Loans receivable, net at June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 are summarized as follows (dollars in millions): 
 
June 30,
 
December 31,
 
2017
 
2016
One- to four-family
$
1,659

 
$
1,950

Home equity
1,287

 
1,556

Consumer
212

 
250

Total loans receivable
3,158

 
3,756

Unamortized premiums, net
13

 
16

Allowance for loan losses
(116
)
 
(221
)
Total loans receivable, net
$
3,055

 
$
3,551


During the three months ended June 30, 2017, the Company sold certain loans with a carrying value of $41 million for proceeds that approximated book value.
At June 30, 2017, the Company pledged $2.6 billion and $0.2 billion of loans as collateral to the FHLB and Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond, respectively. At December 31, 2016, the Company pledged $3.1 billion and $0.3 billion of loans as collateral to the FHLB and Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond, respectively.
The following table presents the total recorded investment in loans receivable and allowance for loan losses by loans that have been collectively evaluated for impairment and those that have been individually evaluated for impairment by loan class at June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 (dollars in millions): 
 
Recorded Investment
 
Allowance for Loan Losses
 
June 30,
 
December 31,
 
June 30,
 
December 31,
 
2017
 
2016
 
2017
 
2016
Collectively evaluated for impairment:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
One- to four-family
$
1,445

 
$
1,717

 
$
22

 
$
38

Home equity
1,109

 
1,361

 
44

 
120

Consumer
214

 
253

 
5

 
5

Total collectively evaluated for impairment
2,768

 
3,331

 
71

 
163

Individually evaluated for impairment:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
One- to four-family
225

 
246

 
7

 
7

Home equity
178

 
195

 
38

 
51

Total individually evaluated for impairment
403

 
441

 
45

 
58

Total
$
3,171

 
$
3,772

 
$
116

 
$
221


Credit Quality and Concentrations of Credit Risk
The Company tracks and reviews factors to predict and monitor credit risk in its mortgage loan portfolio on an ongoing basis. These factors include: loan type, estimated current LTV/CLTV ratios, delinquency history, borrowers’ current credit scores, housing prices, loan vintage and geographic location of the property. The Company believes LTV/CLTV ratios and credit scores are the key factors in determining future loan performance. The factors are updated on at least a quarterly basis. The Company tracks and reviews delinquency status to predict and monitor credit risk in the consumer loan portfolio on at least a quarterly basis.
Credit Quality
The following tables show the distribution of the Company’s mortgage loan portfolios by credit quality indicator at June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 (dollars in millions): 
 
One- to Four-Family
 
Home Equity
 
June 30,
 
December 31,
 
June 30,
 
December 31,
Current LTV/CLTV(1)
2017
 
2016
 
2017
 
2016
<=80%
$
1,135

 
$
1,308

 
$
592

 
$
686

80%-100%
334

 
413

 
349

 
414

100%-120%
99

 
143

 
214

 
274

>120%
91

 
86

 
132

 
182

Total mortgage loans receivable
$
1,659

 
$
1,950

 
$
1,287

 
$
1,556

Average estimated current LTV/CLTV (2)
73
%
 
73
%
 
85
%
 
87
%
Average LTV/CLTV at loan origination (3)
71
%
 
71
%
 
81
%
 
81
%
 
(1)
Current CLTV calculations for home equity loans are based on the maximum available line for HELOCs and outstanding principal balance for home equity installment loans. For home equity loans in the second lien position, the original balance of the first lien loan at origination date and updated valuations on the property underlying the loan are used to calculate CLTV. Current property value estimates are updated on a quarterly basis.
(2)
The average estimated current LTV/CLTV ratio reflects the outstanding balance at the balance sheet date and the maximum available line for HELOCs, divided by the estimated current value of the underlying property.
(3)
Average LTV/CLTV at loan origination calculations are based on LTV/CLTV at time of purchase for one- to four-family purchased loans and home equity installment loans and maximum available line for HELOCs
 
One- to Four-Family
 
Home Equity
 
June 30,
 
December 31,
 
June 30,
 
December 31,
Current FICO
2017
 
2016
 
2017
 
2016
>=720
$
941

 
$
1,121

 
$
639

 
$
778

719 - 700
153

 
179

 
127

 
156

699 - 680
115

 
153

 
109

 
141

679 - 660
109

 
121

 
92

 
117

659 - 620
141

 
154

 
125

 
149

<620
200

 
222

 
195

 
215

Total mortgage loans receivable
$
1,659

 
$
1,950

 
$
1,287

 
$
1,556


Concentrations of Credit Risk
The following table outlines when one- to four-family and HELOCs convert to amortizing by percentage of the one- to four-family portfolio and HELOC portfolios, respectively, at June 30, 2017:
Period of Conversion to Amortizing Loan
% of One- to Four-Family
Portfolio
 
% of Home Equity Line of 
Credit Portfolio
Already amortizing
96%
 
99%
Q3 2017
4%
 
—%
Q4 2017 or later
—%
 
1%

The average age of our mortgage loans receivable was 11.3 and 10.8 years at June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively. Approximately 35% and 36% of the Company’s mortgage loans receivable were concentrated in California at June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively. No other state had concentrations of mortgage loans that represented 10% or more of the Company’s mortgage loans receivable at June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016.
Delinquent Loans
The following table shows total loans receivable by delinquency category at June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 (dollars in millions): 
 
Current
 
30-89 Days
Delinquent
 
90-179 Days
Delinquent
 
180+ Days
Delinquent
 
Total
June 30, 2017
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
One- to four-family
$
1,488

 
$
62

 
$
28

 
$
81

 
$
1,659

Home equity
1,192

 
37

 
18

 
40

 
1,287

Consumer
208

 
4

 

 

 
212

Total loans receivable
$
2,888

 
$
103

 
$
46

 
$
121

 
$
3,158

December 31, 2016
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
One- to four-family
$
1,774

 
$
67

 
$
23

 
$
86

 
$
1,950

Home equity
1,442

 
43

 
18

 
53

 
1,556

Consumer
245

 
4

 
1

 

 
250

Total loans receivable
$
3,461

 
$
114

 
$
42

 
$
139

 
$
3,756


One- to four-family loans are generally secured in a first lien position by real estate assets, reducing the potential loss when compared to an unsecured loan. Home equity loans are generally secured by real estate assets; however, the majority of these loans are secured in a second lien position, which substantially increases the potential loss when compared to a first lien position. The loss severity of our second lien home equity loans was approximately 85% for a trailing twelve-month period as of June 30, 2017.
Nonperforming Loans
The following table shows the comparative data for nonperforming loans at June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 (dollars in millions):
  
June 30,
 
December 31,
 
2017
 
2016
One- to four-family
$
205

 
$
215

Home equity
116

 
136

Consumer

 
1

Total nonperforming loans receivable
$
321

 
$
352


At June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, the Company held $29 million and $35 million, respectively, of real estate owned that were acquired through foreclosure or through a deed in lieu of foreclosure or similar legal agreement. The Company held $102 million and $112 million of loans for which formal foreclosure proceedings were in process at June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively.
Allowance for Loan Losses
The following table provides a roll forward by loan portfolio of the allowance for loan losses for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016 (dollars in millions):
 
Three Months Ended June 30, 2017
 
One- to
Four-Family
 
Home
Equity
 
Consumer
 
Total
Allowance for loan losses, beginning of period
$
46

 
$
162

 
$
5

 
$
213

Provision (benefit) for loan losses
(18
)
 
(81
)
 

 
(99
)
Charge-offs

 
(5
)
 
(1
)
 
(6
)
Recoveries
1

 
6

 
1

 
8

Net (charge-offs) recoveries
1

 
1

 

 
2

Allowance for loan losses, end of period
$
29

 
$
82

 
$
5

 
$
116

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Three Months Ended June 30, 2016
 
One- to
Four-Family
 
Home
Equity
 
Consumer
 
Total
Allowance for loan losses, beginning of period
$
49

 
$
267

 
$
6

 
$
322

Provision (benefit) for loan losses
(8
)
 
(28
)
 
1

 
(35
)
Charge-offs

 
(4
)
 
(2
)
 
(6
)
Recoveries
1

 
10

 
1

 
12

Net (charge-offs) recoveries
1

 
6

 
(1
)
 
6

Allowance for loan losses, end of period
$
42

 
$
245

 
$
6

 
$
293

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Six Months Ended June 30, 2017
 
One- to
Four-Family
 
Home
Equity
 
Consumer
 
Total
Allowance for loan losses, beginning of period
$
45

 
$
171

 
$
5

 
$
221

Provision (benefit) for loan losses
(18
)
 
(96
)
 
1

 
(113
)
Charge-offs

 
(5
)
 
(3
)
 
(8
)
Recoveries
2

 
12

 
2

 
16

Net (charge-offs) recoveries
2

 
7

 
(1
)
 
8

Allowance for loan losses, end of period
$
29

 
$
82

 
$
5

 
$
116

 
Six Months Ended June 30, 2016
 
One- to
Four-Family
 
Home
Equity
 
Consumer
 
Total
Allowance for loan losses, beginning of period
$
40

 
$
307

 
$
6

 
$
353

Provision (benefit) for loan losses

 
(70
)
 
1

 
(69
)
Charge-offs
(1
)
 
(9
)
 
(4
)
 
(14
)
Recoveries
3

 
17

 
3

 
23

Net (charge-offs) recoveries
2

 
8

 
(1
)
 
9

Allowance for loan losses, end of period
$
42

 
$
245

 
$
6

 
$
293

During the three months ended June 30, 2017, the Company refined the default assumptions in the quantitative allowance methodology based on the sustained outperformance of converted mortgage loans that had been amortizing for 12 months or longer. This refinement resulted in approximately $70 million of benefit to the provision for loan losses during the second quarter of 2017. In order to refine the default assumptions around the remaining population that had not yet started amortizing or that had not reached 12 months post conversion, the Company evaluated whether the credit quality and performance of these loans was consistent with the seasoned amortizing portfolio. The Company determined that FICO scores, LTV/CLTVs and delinquency rates were comparable to the seasoned portfolio, and therefore applied the refined default assumptions to this remaining population. The current period benefit also reflected recoveries in excess of prior estimates, including recoveries of previous charge-offs.
Impaired Loans—Troubled Debt Restructurings
The following table shows a summary of the Company’s recorded investment in TDRs that were on accrual and nonaccrual status, further disaggregated by delinquency status, in addition to the recorded investment in TDRs at June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 (dollars in millions):
  
 
 
Nonaccrual TDRs
 
 
 
Accrual 
TDRs(1)
 
Current(2)
 
30-89 Days
Delinquent
 
90-179 Days
Delinquent
 
180+ Days
Delinquent
 
Total Recorded
Investment in 
TDRs (3)(4)
June 30, 2017
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
One- to four-family
$
88

 
$
80

 
$
15

 
$
9

 
$
33

 
$
225

Home equity
111

 
38

 
9

 
4

 
16

 
178

Total
$
199

 
$
118

 
$
24

 
$
13

 
$
49

 
$
403

December 31, 2016
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
One- to four-family
$
97

 
$
90

 
$
16

 
$
8

 
$
35

 
$
246

Home equity
119

 
41

 
10

 
4

 
21

 
195

Total
$
216

 
$
131

 
$
26

 
$
12

 
$
56

 
$
441



(1)
Represents loans modified as TDRs that are current and have made six or more consecutive payments.
(2)
Represents loans modified as TDRs that are current but have not yet made six consecutive payments, bankruptcy loans and certain junior lien TDRs that have a delinquent senior lien.
(3)
The unpaid principal balance in one- to four-family TDRs was $223 million and $243 million at June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively. For home equity loans, the recorded investment in TDRs represents the unpaid principal balance.
(4)
Total recorded investment in TDRs at June 30, 2017 consisted of $295 million of loans modified as TDRs and $108 million of loans that have been charged off due to bankruptcy notification. Total recorded investment in TDRs at December 31, 2016 consisted of $316 million of loans modified as TDRs and $125 million of loans that have been charged off due to bankruptcy notification.
The recorded investment in loans modified as TDRs includes the charge-offs related to certain loans that were written down to estimated current value of the underlying property less estimated selling costs. These charge-offs were recorded on modified loans that were delinquent in excess of 180 days, in bankruptcy, or when certain characteristics of the loan, including CLTV, borrower's credit and type of modification, cast substantial doubt on the borrower's ability to repay the loan.
The following table shows the average recorded investment and interest income recognized both on a cash and accrual basis for the Company’s TDRs during the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016 (dollars in millions):
 
Average Recorded Investment
 
Interest Income Recognized
 
Three Months Ended June 30,
 
Three Months Ended June 30,
 
2017
 
2016
 
2017
 
2016
One- to four-family
$
231

 
$
278

 
$
2

 
$
3

Home equity
184

 
206

 
4

 
4

Total
$
415

 
$
484

 
$
6

 
$
7

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Average Recorded Investment
 
Interest Income Recognized
 
Six Months Ended June 30,
 
Six Months Ended June 30,
 
2017
 
2016
 
2017
 
2016
One- to four-family
$
236

 
$
280

 
$
5

 
$
5

Home equity
188

 
206

 
8

 
8

Total
$
424

 
$
486

 
$
13

 
$
13


The following table shows detailed information related to the Company’s TDRs and specific valuation allowances at June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 (dollars in millions): 
  
June 30, 2017
 
December 31, 2016
 
Recorded
Investment
in TDRs
 
Specific
Valuation
Allowance
 
Net
Investment
in TDRs
 
Recorded
Investment
in TDRs
 
Specific
Valuation
Allowance
 
Net
Investment
in TDRs
With a recorded allowance:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
One- to four-family
$
57

 
$
7

 
$
50

 
$
61

 
$
7

 
$
54

Home equity
$
95

 
$
38

 
$
57

 
$
111

 
$
51

 
$
60

Without a recorded allowance:(1)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
One- to four-family
$
168

 
$

 
$
168

 
$
185

 
$

 
$
185

Home equity
$
83

 
$

 
$
83

 
$
84

 
$

 
$
84

Total:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
One- to four-family
$
225

 
$
7

 
$
218

 
$
246

 
$
7

 
$
239

Home equity
$
178

 
$
38

 
$
140

 
$
195

 
$
51

 
$
144

(1)
Represents loans where the discounted cash flow analysis or collateral value is equal to or exceeds the recorded investment in the loan.
The following tables provide the number of loans and post-modification balances immediately after being modified by major class during the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016 (dollars in millions):
 
Three Months Ended June 30, 2017
 
 
 
Interest Rate Reduction
 
 
 
 
 
Number of
Loans
 
Re-age/
Extension/
Interest
Capitalization
 
Other with
Interest Rate
Reduction
 
Other(1)
 
Total
One- to four-family
4

 
$
1

 
$

 
$
1

 
$
2

Home equity
53

 
2

 
1

 
1

 
4

Total
57

 
$
3

 
$
1

 
$
2

 
$
6

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Three Months Ended June 30, 2016
 
 
 
Interest Rate Reduction
 
 
 
 
 
Number of
Loans
 
Re-age/
Extension/
Interest
Capitalization
 
Other with
Interest Rate
Reduction
 
Other(1)
 
Total
One- to four-family
7

 
$
2

 
$

 
$
1

 
$
3

Home equity
164

 
3

 
2

 
6

 
11

Total
171

 
$
5

 
$
2

 
$
7

 
$
14

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Six Months Ended June 30, 2017
 
 
 
Interest Rate Reduction
 
 
 
 
 
Number of
Loans
 
Re-age/
Extension/
Interest
Capitalization
 
Other with
Interest Rate
Reduction
 
Other(1)
 
Total
One- to four-family
12

 
$
3

 
$

 
$
1

 
$
4

Home equity
214

 
5

 
1

 
9

 
15

Total
226

 
$
8

 
$
1

 
$
10

 
$
19

 
Six Months Ended June 30, 2016
 
 
 
Interest Rate Reduction
 
 
 
 
 
Number of
Loans
 
Re-age/
Extension/
Interest
Capitalization
 
Other with
Interest Rate
Reduction
 
Other(1)
 
Total
One- to four-family
21

 
$
6

 
$

 
$
2

 
$
8

Home equity
357

 
5

 
3

 
18

 
26

Total
378

 
$
11

 
$
3

 
$
20

 
$
34


(1)
Amounts represent loans whose terms were modified in a manner that did not result in an interest rate reduction, including re-aged loans, extensions, and loans with capitalized interest.