10KSB 1 d86181e10ksb.txt FORM 10KSB FOR FISCAL YEAR END DECEMBER 31, 2000 1 U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549 FORM 10-KSB (Mark One) [ X ] ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 [FEE REQUIRED] For the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2000 [ ] TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 [NO FEE REQUIRED] COMMISSION FILE NUMBER 0-20791 AMARILLO BIOSCIENCES, INC. (NAME OF SMALL BUSINESS ISSUER IN ITS CHARTER) TEXAS 75-1974352 (State of other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer incorporation or organization) Identification No.) 800 WEST 9TH AVENUE, AMARILLO, TEXAS 79101 (Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
ISSUER'S TELEPHONE NUMBER, INCLUDING AREA CODE: (806) 376-1741 Securities registered under Section 12(b) of the Exchange Act: None. Securities registered under Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act: Common Stock, Par Value $.01 (Title of class) Check whether the issuer (1) filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act during the past 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes X No --- --- Check if there is no disclosure of delinquent filers in response to Item 405 of Regulation S-B in this form, and no disclosure will be contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-KSB or any amendment to this Form 10-KSB. [ ] Revenues for its most recent fiscal year were $53,756 As of December 31, 2000, there were outstanding 7,807,357 shares of the registrant's common stock, par value $.01, which is the only class of common or voting stock of the registrant. As of that date, the aggregate market value of the shares of common stock held by nonaffiliates of the registrant (based on the closing price for the common stock on the OTC BB) was approximately $4,217,306. 2 PART I The following contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. The Company's actual results could differ materially from those discussed in the forward-looking statements as a result of certain factors, including those set forth in "Management's 2001 Plan of Operations" as well as those discussed elsewhere in this Form 10-KSB. The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the Financial Statements and the Notes thereto included elsewhere in this Form 10-KSB. ITEM 1. DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS. GENERAL Amarillo Biosciences, Inc. (the "Company" or "ABI"), a development-stage company incorporated in 1984, is engaged in developing biologics for the treatment of human and animal diseases. The Company is currently focusing its research on human health indications for the use of low dose orally administered natural human interferon alpha (IFNa), particularly for the treatment of Sjogren's syndrome, fibromyalgia, hepatitis B, hepatitis C and Behcet's disease. The Company believes that significant worldwide opportunities exist for the development of low dose orally administered natural IFNa as a cost effective, non-toxic, efficacious alternative to the treatment of disease by injection of high doses of IFNa. In addition, the Company believes that low dose oral natural human IFNa will be an effective treatment for diseases or conditions for which current therapies are inadequate. The Company owns or licenses 19 United States patents relating to low dose oral natural IFNa. Since 1992, the Company has filed with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration ("FDA"), and there now are in effect, 6 Investigational New Drug ("IND") Applications covering indicated uses for low dose oral IFNa, including treatment of Sjogren's syndrome and fibromyalgia. The Company is seeking regulatory approvals in certain foreign countries to test low dose oral IFNa in the treatment of hepatitis B and C. The Company's objective is to exploit its proprietary technology to become a leader in the field of low dose oral IFNa applications. The Company's business strategy is to pursue those indications for low dose oral IFNa treatment for which initial clinical research has indicated the treatment is efficacious and which, in the opinion of the Company, have the greatest commercial potential and are most likely to be approved by the FDA. To the extent possible, the Company will attempt to minimize the cost to the Company of obtaining FDA approval by utilizing forms of IFNa already approved (in other dosage forms and for different indications) by the Japanese Ministry of Health and Welfare for human use. The Company believes that cost savings will result. The Company will attempt to gain market share for approved products by forming alliances with strong marketing partners. The Company has 6 full-time employees and one part-time employee. The Company makes extensive use of consultants in business and research and development. 2 3 HUMAN HEALTH APPLICATIONS Sjogren's Syndrome. Sjogren's syndrome is a chronic autoimmune disorder characterized by dryness of the eyes and mouth. It can exist as a primary disorder or in association with other autoimmune diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis, systemic lupus erythematosus and scleroderma. Patients with primary Sjogren's syndrome may have clinical signs such as rash, arthritis, pneumonitis and nephritis. Typical symptoms include the sensation of burning in the eyes, dryness of the mouth, skin, nose and vagina, difficulty swallowing, painful throat and fatigue. Oral candidiasis (a fungus infection of the mouth) may also arise as a result of reduced saliva flow. Although Sjogren's syndrome is not life threatening, it can cause extreme discomfort and seriously impair quality of life. The Sjogren's Syndrome Foundation, Inc. estimates that there are approximately two to four million people in the United States who suffer from Sjogren's syndrome. The Company believes that the incidence of Sjogren's syndrome worldwide is similar to its incidence in the United States. Women constitute 90% of Sjogren's patients. Topical use of artificial tears is the prevailing treatment for the dry eye symptom of the disease. Artificial tears must be used on a regular basis. Intensive oral hygiene is prescribed to prevent progressive oral problems that may develop as a result of the disease. Topical and systemic means of increasing salivary flow may provide transient relief of symptoms. The Company believes that oral IFNa therapy helps to relieve the dryness associated with Sjogren's syndrome, improves secretory function, and may effectively supplement, or be used in lieu of, existing treatments. A Phase II trial using low dose orally administered IFNa was completed in late 1997. At the end of 12 weeks, ninety patients who took placebo or interferon were evaluable. Patients given 150 IU three times per day had a significant (p<0.014) increase in stimulated saliva production. Subjective measures of relief of dryness also favored the same interferon group. The Phase III pivotal trial program for Sjogren's syndrome was initiated in November 1998. Protocols compared treatment with low dose orally-administered IFNa (150 IU lozenges) and placebo. The endpoints were significant improvement in salivary function and relief of oral dryness. The first of 2 randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled efficacy studies completed enrollment of 241 subjects in August, 1999. Subjects finished treatment in February 2000. After 24 weeks of treatment, neither primary endpoint was significantly improved in the IFNa group, compared to the placebo group. However, unstimulated whole saliva flow (UWS), an important measure of basal salivary gland function, was significantly increased in IFNa-treated patients, compared to placebo. In addition, increases in UWS correlated significantly with improvement in the symptoms of Sjogren's syndrome in IFNa-treated, but not placebo patients. The second efficacy trial of 256 subjects began active enrollment in September 1999, finalized enrollment in March 2000 and completed treatment of all patients in September 2000. Neither primary endpoint was significantly improved in the IFNa group, compared to the placebo group, after 24 weeks of treatment. However, unstimulated whole saliva flow (UWS), an important measure of basal salivary gland function, was borderline significantly increased in IFNa-treated patients, compared to placebo. In addition, increases in UWS correlated significantly with improvement in the symptoms of Sjogren's syndrome in IFNa-treated, but not placebo patients. 3 4 Following 24 weeks of treatment, subjects who successfully completed these controlled trials were eligible to enter a 24-week "open-label" trial, in which all subjects were given active treatment with 150 IU IFNa lozenges. A preliminary analysis has been conducted to date using data from all patients who completed the study (n=179). In this group, mean unstimulated whole saliva (UWS) was increased at week 24 compared to baseline, but this difference failed to reach statistical significance. Mean stimulated whole saliva (SWS) was relatively unchanged during treatment. However, several of the subjective endpoints were significantly increased (improved) at week 24, compared to baseline, including oral dryness, oral comfort, eye dryness and throat dryness. In addition, data from the open-label and double-blind studies have been combined and a preliminary analysis of patients who completed both studies has been conducted (n=175). Patients who received IFNa for 48 weeks had a significantly greater (p<0.001) mean UWS at the end of treatment compared to baseline. Patients who received placebo for 24 weeks and IFNa for 24 weeks exhibited a non-significant UWS increase. These data seem to indicate that improvement from IFNa is gradual and continues throughout treatment. Both groups had non-significant increases in SWS. Concerning subjective endpoints, both groups had significant improvement from baseline to week 48 in all 8 of the symptoms that were assessed, with the biggest increases noted for oral dryness and oral comfort (p<0.0001 for both groups). Hepatitis B and C. Viral hepatitis is a worldwide health problem of enormous proportions and consequences. It is the most common cause of jaundice, chronic liver disease, cirrhosis, and hepatocellular carcinoma. It has been estimated by the World Health Organization that there are 500 million individuals infected worldwide with one of the six distinct hepatitis viruses. The Company has prepared clinical trial protocols to test the efficacy of low dose orally-administered IFNa as a sole treatment in chronic active hepatitis B, and in combination with other anti-viral agents in treatment of hepatitis C. The Company is engaged in active discussions to initiate clinical trials in countries where hepatitis virus infection is endemic. Fibromyalgia. During 1999, the Company conducted a Phase II randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blinded trial in fibromyalgia patients. This clinical study examined the effects of low dose orally-administered IFNa on relief of morning stiffness, a significant aspect of the symptom complex in this disorder. IFNa lozenge treatment was combined with a low dose of amitriptyline, an antidepressant commonly used in this condition. The Phase II results of the fibromyalgia clinical trial became available in March, 2000. The three-month study, involving 89 patients at four clinical sites around the United States, was designed to measure the effectiveness of low doses of orally administered interferon-alpha (IFNa) in relieving morning stiffness of joints, a significant problem for fibromyalgia sufferers. Patients participating in the study were divided into three groups, and each individual was given three lozenges per day. The three lozenges given to members of the first group contained 50 international units (IU) of IFNa each, while the second group got one 50 IU IFNa lozenge and two placebos. Members of the final group received three placebos. All three groups reported a reduction in morning stiffness, but across the entire study panel the improvement was most pronounced in those taking one 50 IU lozenge of IFNa per day. However, the result did not reach statistical significance relative to the controls, nor did increasing the dosage to three IFNa lozenges per day improve on the results. Prior to commencing further clinical trials in fibromyalgia, the Company will consult with a group of expert clinicians and 4 5 opinion leaders in fibromyalgia syndrome research to review the results of our studies to date and to assist us in designing any future trials. HIV. A pilot trial was completed of treatment of persistent, treatment-resistant oral viral warts in patients infected with HIV. Oral warts have been identified as an oral complication of HIV infection with a growing incidence. In this open-label study, significant reductions were seen in wart surface area and numbers of warts following treatment with low dose orally-administered IFNa. The Company filed with the FDA Office of Orphan Drugs and was granted (Summer 2000) orphan drug status for low dose IFNa treatment in this condition. Future clinical trials will be conducted to confirm and extend these initial encouraging results. Behcet's Disease. Behcet's disease is a severe chronic relapsing inflammatory disorder marked by oral and genital ulcers, eye inflammation (uveitis) and skin lesions, as well as varying multisystem involvement including the joints, blood vessels, central nervous system, and gastrointestinal tract. The oral lesions are an invariable sign, occurring in all patients at some time in the disease. Behcet's disease is found world-wide, and is a significant cause of partial or total disability. The US patient population has been estimated as 15,000. The Company filed with the FDA Office of Orphan Drugs and was granted (Spring 2000) orphan drug status for low dose orally-administered IFNa treatment in this condition. A clinical protocol was prepared for a controlled study and the Company participated in a teleconference with the FDA on the subject of low dose IFNa in Behcet's disease in November 2000. Future clinical trials in Behcet's disease will depend on funding. STRATEGIC ALLIANCE WITH HBL Hayashibara Biochemical Laboratories, Inc. ("HBL") was established in 1970 to engage in research and development. It is a subsidiary of Hayashibara Company, Ltd., a privately-owned Japanese holding corporation with diversified subsidiaries. For more than 100 years the Hayashibara Company, Ltd. and its predecessors have been applying microbiological technology in the starch industry for the production of maltose and other sugars. In 1981, HBL established the Fujisaki Institute to accelerate development of industrial methods for the production of biologics and to sponsor clinical trials for such products. In 1985, HBL built the Fujisaki Cell Center to support basic research. In 1987, HBL successfully accomplished the mass production of human cells in an animal host by producing human cells in hamsters. This made it possible to economically produce a natural form of human IFNa and other biologics. HBL also has developed and obtained patents for technology relating to the production of IFNa-containing lozenges by which the stability of the IFNa activity can be maintained for up to 18 months at room temperature and up to three years if the product is refrigerated. The Company believes that the use of such lozenges gives it advantages over competitive technologies in terms of cost, taste and ease of handling. On March 13, 1992, the Company entered into a Joint Development and Manufacturing/Supply Agreement with HBL (the "Development Agreement"). Such Development Agreement was subsequently amended on January 17, 1996, and May 10, 1996. Among other things, the Development Agreement provides the Company with a source of natural human interferon alpha for use in the Company's interferon alpha-containing products. Additional information on the Development Agreement is set forth in footnote 4 to the Consolidated Financial Statements attached to this 10-KSB. 5 6 In September 1997, HBL and ABI entered license agreements granting exclusive rights to ABI to develop interferon gamma for oral use in humans and for all routes of administration in animals, and tumor necrosis factor alpha for oral and topical uses in humans and for all routes of administration in animals; the rights were granted worldwide, except Japan. In June 2000, HBL and ABI amended their license agreement on interferon gamma to include the inhalation route of administration. OTHER AGREEMENTS The Company and Mitsubishi Corporation entered into an agreement in November, 1992, whereby Mitsubishi would provide market development, licensing, and distribution services for IFNa in designated parts of the world. This agreement terminated November 26, 2000. On June 16, 1999, the Company entered into a License Agreement with North China Pharmaceutical Group Corporation ("NCPC"), which contemplated the conduct of clinical trials, and eventual product sales in the Peoples Republic of China.. To date, the Company has received no payment from NCPC, nor have clinical trials been initiated. Although the agreement has not been officially terminated, NCPC has informed the Company that it is not possible to import IFNa into China. ABI therefore assumes that the contract will not be honored by NCPC and no revenues nor clinical funding will be attributable to this agreement. PATENTS AND PROPRIETARY RIGHTS One patent was issued in 2000. This patent is "Treatment of Fibromyalgia With Low Dose Interferon" (U.S. Patent No. 6,036,949) issued March 14, 2000, valid until March 5, 2018. COMPETITION The pharmaceutical industry is an expanding and rapidly changing industry characterized by intense competition. The Company believes that its ability to compete will be dependent in large part upon its ability to continually enhance and improve its products and technologies. In order to do so, the Company must effectively utilize and expand its research and development capabilities and, once developed, expeditiously convert new technology into products and processes which can be commercialized. Competition is based primarily on scientific and technological superiority, technical support, availability of patent protection, access to adequate capital, the ability to develop, acquire and market products and processes successfully, the ability to obtain governmental approvals and the ability to serve the particular needs of commercial customers. Corporations and institutions with greater resources than the Company may, therefore, have a significant competitive advantage. The Company's potential competitors include entities that develop and produce therapeutic agents for treatment of human and animal disease. These include numerous public and private academic and research organizations and pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies pursuing production of, among other things, biologics from cell cultures, genetically engineered drugs and natural and chemically synthesized drugs. Almost all of these potential competitors have substantially greater capital resources, research and development capabilities, manufacturing and marketing resources and experience than the Company. The Company's competitors may succeed in developing products or processes that are more effective or less costly than any that may be developed by the Company, or that gain regulatory approval prior to the Company's products. The Company also expects that the 6 7 number of its competitors and potential competitors will increase as more IFN[alpha] products receive commercial marketing approvals from the FDA or analogous foreign regulatory agencies. Any of these competitors may be more successful than the Company in manufacturing, marketing and distributing its products. There can be no assurance that the Company will be able to compete successfully. GOVERNMENT REGULATION Once a new compound has been identified in the laboratory, medicines are developed as follows: Preclinical testing. A pharmaceutical company conducts laboratory and animal studies to show biological activity of the compound against the targeted disease, and the compound is evaluated for safety. Investigational New Drug Application (IND). After completing preclinical testing, a company files an IND with the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to begin to test the drug in people. The IND becomes effective if the FDA does not disapprove it within 30 days. The IND shows results of previous experiments; how, where and by whom the new studies will be conducted; the chemical structure of the compound; how it is thought to work in the body; any toxic effects found in the animal studies; and how the compound is manufactured. All clinical trials must be reviewed and approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) where the trials will be conducted. Progress reports on clinical trials must be submitted at least annually to FDA and the IRB. Clinical Trials, Phase I. These tests involve about 20 to 80 normal, healthy volunteers. The tests study a drug's safety profile, including the safe dosage range. The studies also determine how a drug is absorbed, distributed, metabolized, and excreted as well as the duration of its action. Clinical Trials, Phase II. In this phase, controlled trials of approximately 100 to 300 volunteer patients (people with the disease) assess a drug's effectiveness. Clinical Trials, Phase III. This phase usually involves 1,000 to 3,000 patients in clinics and hospitals. Physicians monitor patients closely to confirm efficacy and identify adverse events. These numbers may be modified based on the disease prevalence. ABI's Phase III clinical trial as negotiated with the FDA will require a total of 500 patients. New Drug Application (NDA)/Biologics License Application (BLA). Following the completion of all three phases of clinical trials, a company analyzes all of the data and files with FDA an NDA, in the case of a drug product, or a BLA in the case of a biologic product, if the data successfully demonstrate both safety and effectiveness. The NDA/BLA contains all of the scientific information that the Company has gathered. NDA's typically run 100,000 pages or more. By law, FDA is allowed twelve months to review a standard NDA/BLA. Approval. Once FDA approves an NDA, the new medicine becomes available for physicians to prescribe. A company must continue to submit periodic reports to FDA, including any cases of adverse reactions and appropriate quality-control records. For some medicines, FDA requires additional trials (Phase IV) to evaluate long-term effects. 7 8 ABI obtained an IND for oral IFNa in the treatment of Sjogren's syndrome in 1994. ABI successfully completed Phase I development in 1996, Phase II development in 1997, and launched the first of its Phase III trials in November 1998. All Phase III trials in the treatment of Sjogren's syndrome were completed in 2000. An IND for oral IFNa in the treatment of fibromyalgia was obtained in 1993. Phase I/II studies were completed in 1995. The confirmatory Phase II trial was initiated in 1998 and was completed in February, 2000. RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT During the years ended December 31, 2000 and 1999, the Company incurred expenses of $2,276,504 and $4,732,365, respectively, resulting from Company-sponsored research and development activities. Research and development is expected to remain a significant component of the Company's business. The Company has arranged for others to perform substantially all of its clinical research and intends to continue to do so while utilizing its staff for monitoring such research. See also ITEM 6, "MANAGEMENT'S 2001 PLAN OF OPERATIONS - Research and Development". ITEM 2. DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY. The Company's executive and administrative offices are located at 800 West 9th Avenue, Amarillo, Texas in a 5,200 square foot facility owned by the Company. The building contains offices, meeting rooms and a biologic storage area. The Company believes that the facility is adequate for its present and anticipated use. The facility is insured against hazards in the amount of its market value. ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS. None. ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS. None. PART II ITEM 5. MARKET FOR COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED SHAREHOLDER MATTERS The Company is presently traded on the OTC Bulletin Board under the symbol AMAR. The range of high and low sales prices as quoted on the OTC Bulletin Board for each quarter of 2000 and 1999 was as follows: 8 9
2000 1999 ------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------ Quarter High Low High Low ------------------------------ ------------------ ----------------- ------------------ ----------------- First $4.4375 $1.5625 $3.5000 $0.8125 Second 3.7500 1.5000 3.1250 1.4062 Third 2.6250 1.4375 1.8750 0.6250 Fourth 1.5625 0.4375 1.8750 0.5000
As of December 31, 2000, the Company had 312 shareholders of record. ITEM 6. MANAGEMENT'S 2001 PLAN OF OPERATIONS The Company's Management has developed a Plan of Operations for 2001. As a development stage company, the Company continues to engage in research and development activities focused on developing biologics for the treatment of human and animal diseases. The Company has not commenced any significant product commercialization and, until such time as it does, will not generate significant product revenues. The Company's accumulated deficit has continued to grow, from approximately $17,497,000 at December 31, 1999 to $20,892,000 at December 31, 2000. Operating losses are expected to continue for the foreseeable future and until such time as the Company is able to attain sales levels sufficient to support its operations. In 2001 the Company will continue its research and development activities, as well as the activities necessary to develop commercial partnerships and licenses. The Company's expenditure of financial resources in 2001 will fall principally into seven broad categories, as follows: Revenue From Sales of Dietary Supplement; Research and Development; Personnel; Consulting and Professional (except legal and accounting); Legal and Accounting; Public Relations, Investor Relations, and Shareholder Relations; and Liquidity Needs. The Company's expectations and goals with respect to these categories are addressed separately below, by category: REVENUE FROM SALES OF DIETARY SUPPLEMENT The Company has received orders for anhydrous crystalline maltose (ACM) from Natrol as dictated by the Supply Agreement executed in December 2000 (see F-16). The Company has received copies of the advertising campaign Natrol will be starting in April 2001 and Natrol has identified retailers who will start selling ACM in the second quarter of 2001. The Company expects sales of ACM to generate at least $211,000 for ABI in the first half of 2001 from the minimum orders. Other supply agreements, in negotiation, are expected to provide additional revenue to the Company. RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT Until it achieves commercial product sales, the Company's business is research and development, and this is the area where the Company's principal efforts will be expended in 2001. The Company has budgeted approximately $813,000 for expenditure in 2001 on research and development. 9 10 The budgeted amount for Research and Development in 2000 was almost exclusively dedicated to the completion of the pivotal Phase III Sjogren's syndrome clinical trial. The Phase III pivotal trial program for Sjogren's syndrome was initiated in November 1998. Protocols compared treatment with low dose orally-administered IFNa (150 IU lozenges) and placebo. The endpoints were improvement in stimulated salivary flow and relief of oral dryness subjective endpoint. The first of 2 randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled efficacy studies completed enrollment of 241 subjects in August 1999. Subjects finished treatment in February 2000. After 24 weeks of treatment, neither primary endpoint was significantly improved in the IFNa group, compared to the placebo group. However, unstimulated whole saliva flow (UWS), an important measure of basal salivary gland function, was significantly increased in IFNa-treated patients, compared to placebo. In addition, increases in UWS correlated significantly with improvement in the symptoms of Sjogren's syndrome in IFNa-treated, but not placebo patients. The second efficacy trial of 256 subjects began active enrollment in September 1999, finalized enrollment in March 2000 and completed treatment of all patients in September 2000. Neither primary endpoint was significantly improved in the IFNa group, compared to the placebo group, after 24 weeks of treatment. However, unstimulated whole saliva flow (UWS), an important measure of basal salivary gland function, was borderline significantly increased in IFNa-treated patients, compared to placebo. In addition, increases in UWS correlated significantly with improvement in the symptoms of Sjogren's syndrome in IFNa-treated, but not placebo patients. Following 24 weeks of treatment, subjects who successfully completed these controlled trials were eligible to enter a 24-week "open-label" trial, in which all subjects were given active treatment with 150 IU IFNa lozenges. A preliminary analysis has been conducted to date using data from all patients who completed the study (n=179). In this group, mean unstimulated whole saliva (UWS) was increased at week 24 compared to baseline, but this difference failed to reach statistical significance. Mean stimulated whole saliva (SWS) was relatively unchanged during treatment. However, several of the subjective endpoints were significantly increased (improved) at week 24, compared to baseline, including oral dryness, oral comfort, eye dryness and throat dryness. In addition, data from the open-label and double-blind studies have been combined and a preliminary analysis of patients who completed both studies has been conducted (n=175). Patients who received IFNa for 48 weeks had a significantly greater (p<0.001) mean UWS at the end of treatment compared to baseline. Patients who received placebo for 24 weeks and IFNa for 24 weeks exhibited a non-significant UWS increase. These data seem to indicate that improvement from IFNa is gradual and continues throughout treatment. Both groups had non-significant increases in SWS. Concerning subjective endpoints, both groups had significant improvement from baseline to week 48 in all 8 of the symptoms that were assessed, with the biggest increases noted for oral dryness and oral comfort (p<0.0001 for both groups). Other Research and Development expenditures include final costs associated with the fibromyalgia Phase II clinical trial and costs associated with the initiation of a Behcet's disease clinical trial during the first half of 2001. 10 11 PERSONNEL In addition to its intellectual property, the Company's principal assets are its personnel. The Company has been successful in controlling its personnel costs, both by maintaining its principal location in Amarillo, Texas, and by ensuring maximum efficiency and utilization of existing personnel. The Company has budgeted approximately $480,000 for personnel expenses in 2001, including salaries, payroll taxes, directors' and officers' general liability insurance, group health, and liability insurance. Also, in lieu of cash compensation, the Company may issue stock options or other equity instruments to selected employees in fiscal 2001. At the present time, the President and CEO of the Company, Joseph M. Cummins, is also serving as the Company's Chief Financial Officer (CFO). CONSULTING AND PROFESSIONAL (EXCEPT LEGAL AND ACCOUNTING) The Company has budgeted approximately $24,000 for expenditure on professional consultants in 2001. Consulting fees are expected to be paid to a number of independent consultants in connection with the operation of the Company, and to certain directors who perform specific consulting tasks at the Company's request. The Company will continue to use the services of consultants to complement the Company's small full-time staff, where such is a more efficient utiliza tion of the Company's resources. LEGAL AND ACCOUNTING Although the Company is not involved in litigation, it has budgeted legal expenses of approximately $120,000 in 2001. Approximately 20% of the Company's legal expenditures will be for preparation and filing of patents and for maintenance of existing patents in a number of countries. Other legal expenses will be related to compliance with laws and regulations affecting public companies, licensing and contracting, and general corporate matters. The Company does not presently have an in-house legal staff, nor does it intend to put such a staff in place in 2001. The Company has budgeted $40,000 for accounting expense in 2001, and expects to continue with Ernst & Young, LLP as its independent auditors. PUBLIC RELATIONS, INVESTOR RELATIONS AND SHAREHOLDER RELATIONS The Company has budgeted approximately $7,600 for public relations, investor relations and shareholder relations in 2001. The plan for hiring an investor relations firm is to pay in stock options, not cash. The Company has also budgeted sufficient amounts to maintain its comprehensive web site (www.amarbio.com). LIQUIDITY NEEDS The principal budget items discussed above, along with other miscellaneous costs and expenses, will cause the Company to expend approximately $1.7 million in 2001. At December 31, 2000, the Company had available cash of approximately $342,000. The Company also has a working capital deficit of approximately ($615,000). The Company's continued losses and lack of liquidity indicate that the Company may not be able to continue as a going concern for a reasonable period of 11 12 time. The Company's ability to continue as a going concern is dependent upon several factors including, but not limited to, the continued non-demand for immediate payment of outstanding indebtedness by the Company's vendors and suppliers, the Company's ability to generate sufficient cash flows to meet its obligations on a timely basis, obtain additional financing, and continue to obtain supplies and services from its vendors. The Company will need to raise additional funds in order to satisfy its vendors and other creditors and to completely execute its 2001 Plan. The Company is presently negotiating with human health and animal health commercial development partners in various regions of the world including the United States, Canada, Europe, and the Middle East. The Company believes that one or more of these agreements will be executed during 2001. These agreements could generally include provisions for the commercial partner to pay ABI a technology access fee, could include payments for a portion of the clinical trial expenses, could include payment obligations to ABI upon the accomplishment of certain defined tasks, and/or could provide for payments relating to the future sales of commercial product. These agreements could be an important source of funds for ABI. Management believes the fact that it has concluded an advanced Phase III clinical trial significantly enhances its ability to successfully raise additional funds from its commercial partnering activities and from private investors. However, there can be no assurance that the Company will be successful in obtaining additional funding from either human health and animal health commercial development partners or private investors. If the Company is not successful in raising additional funds, it will need to significantly curtail clinical trial expenditures and to further reduce staff and administrative expenses and may be forced to cease operations. Furthermore, the Company's creditors could demand the Company's obligations to them be satisfied immediately. Should this event occur, the Company could be forced to file for protection under Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code if it were not able to obtain alternative sources of financing. FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS Certain statements made in this Plan of Operations and elsewhere in this report are "forward- looking statements" within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (the "Act"). Forward-looking statements include, without limitation, any statement that may predict, forecast, indicate or imply future results, performance, achievements, costs or expenses and may contain words such as "believe", "anticipate", "expect", "estimate", "project", "budget", or words or phrases of similar meaning. Forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties which may cause actual results to differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking statements. Such risks and uncertainties are detailed from time to time in reports filed by the Company with the SEC, including Forms 8-K, 10-QSB and 10-KSB, and include among others the following: promulgation and implementation of regulations by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration ("FDA"); promulgation and implementation of regulations by foreign governmental instrumentalities with functions similar to those of the FDA; costs of research and development and clinical trials, including without limitation, costs of clinical supplies, packaging and inserts, patient recruitment, trial monitoring, trial evaluation, and publication; and possible difficulties in enrolling a sufficient number of qualified patients for certain clinical trials. The Company is also dependent upon a broad range of general economic and financial risks, such as possible increases in the costs of employing and/or retaining qualified personnel and consultants, and possible inflation which might affect the Company's ability to remain within its budget forecasts. The principal uncertainties to which the Company is presently subject are its inability to ensure that the results of the Sjogren's syndrome Phase III trial, or any other trials performed by the Company, will be sufficiently favorable to ensure eventual regulatory approval for commercial sales, its inability to accurately budget at this time the possible costs 12 13 associated with hiring and retaining of additional personnel, uncertainties regarding the terms and timing of one or more commercial partner agreements, and its ability to continue as a going concern. The risks cited here are not exhaustive. Other sections of this report may include additional factors which could adversely impact the Company's business and future prospects. Moreover, the Company is engaged in a very competitive and rapidly changing industry. New risk factors emerge from time to time and it is not possible for management to predict all such risk factors, nor can it assess the impact of all such risk factors on the Company's business, or the extent to which any factor or combination of factors may cause actual results to differ materially from those projected in any forward-looking statements. Given these risks and uncertainties, investors should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements as a prediction of actual future events. ITEM 7. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS. The financial statements of the Company are set forth beginning on page F-1 immediately following the signature page of this report. ITEM 8. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE. None. PART III ITEM 9. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS, PROMOTERS AND CONTROL PERSONS; COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 16(a) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT. As of December 31, 2000, the directors and executive officers of the Company were as follows:
NAME AGE POSITION --------------------------------------------------- --------- ---------------------------------------------- Joseph Cummins, DVM, PhD (1)(3).................... 58 Chairman of the Board, President, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Director Edward Amento, MD (3)(5)........................... 54 Director Stephen Chen, PhD (2)(4)........................... 51 Director James Cook (1)(3)(5)............................... 66 Director Thomas D'Alonzo (1)(2)............................. 57 Director Katsuaki Hayashibara (3)(4)(5)..................... 56 Director Dennis Moore, DVM (1)(4)(5)........................ 54 Director James Page, MD (1)(2)(5)........................... 73 Director Kathleen L. Kelleher (6)........................... 52 Chief Operating Officer, Vice President Business Development
13 14
NAME AGE POSITION --------------------------------------------------- --------- ---------------------------------------------- The following are not executive officers, but are expected by the Company to make a significant contribution to the business: Philip C. Fox, DDS (6)............................. 51 Consultant for Research and Development Martin J. Cummins.................................. 32 Clinical Project Director
(1) Member of the Executive Committee. (2) Member of the Compensation Committee. (3) Member of the Finance Committee. (4) Member of the Audit Committee. (5) Member of the Stock Option Plans Administration Committee. (6) Ms. Kelleher's employment with the Company was terminated effective January 19, 2001, and Dr. Fox's contract of employment with the Company expired December 31, 2000, and was not renewed. Both Ms. Kelleher and Dr. Fox have agreed to remain available to the Company on a consulting basis. Joseph Cummins has been the Chairman of the Board of the Company since he founded it in June 1984. Dr. Cummins has also served as President of the Company since December 1994, and as Chief Financial Officer since October 1998. Dr. Cummins has been conducting research on oral cytokines, most particularly IFN[alpha], in animals and humans for 29 years. Dr. Cummins has more than 40 publications and a dozen patents which reflect his work in the field oral IFN. He received a PhD degree in microbiology from the University of Missouri in 1978 and a doctor of veterinary medicine degree from Ohio State University in 1966. Edward Amento has been a Director of the Company since 1999. Dr. Amento has been Director and Chairman of the Molecular Medicine Research Institute since 1995. Dr. Amento is also clinical professor of medicine and dermatology at Stanford University School of Medicine. He was formerly the President and co-founder of Connective Therapeutics (now Connectics Corp.) of Palo Alto, California. Dr. Amento held senior positions at Genentech from 1987 to 1993. Stephen Chen has been a director of the Company since February 1996. He has been President and Chief Executive Officer of STC International, Inc., a health care investment firm, since May 1992. From August 1989 to May 1992 he was Director of Pharmaceutical Research and Development for the Ciba Consumer Pharmaceuticals Division of Ciba-Geigy. James Cook has been a director of the Company since 1988. He has been President and Chief Executive Officer of the First National Bank of Arvada since January 1992 and from April 1987 to December 1991 he was Executive Vice President of First National Bank of Amarillo. Thomas D'Alonzo has been a director of the Company since 1997. Until September, 1999 he was President and Chief Operating Officer of PPD and its Clinical Research Organization subsidiary, PPD Development, Inc., was President of GENVEC, Inc., from 1993 to 1996, and was President of Glaxo, Inc. from 1983 to 1993. Katsuaki Hayashibara has been a director of the Company since 1994. Mr. Hayashibara was named Director of the Overseas Business Development Division of Hayashibara Company, Ltd. in January 1997. Prior to 1997, Mr. Hayashibara served as Director of Research and Development for HBL. 14 15 Dennis Moore has been a director of the Company since 1986. Dr. Moore has been a doctor of veterinary medicine since 1972 and was in private practice from 1972 to 1995. Since 1995, Dr. Moore has been involved in managing his personal investments. James Page has been a director of the Company since February 1996. Prior to retiring in 1991 as a Vice President with Adria Laboratories, Inc., a pharmaceutical company specializing in therapy given to cancer and AIDS patients, Dr. Page held various upper management level positions with Carter Wallace, Inc., Merck Sharpe & Dohme Research Laboratories and Wyeth Laboratories. Kathleen Kelleher has been an officer of the Company since January 1999. Ms. Kelleher holds a Bachelor's Degree and a Master's Degree in Biology. In addition, she holds a MBA from the University of Chicago. Ms. Kelleher has spent the last twenty years working in the pharmaceutical and biopharmaceutical industry. She has held senior management positions in marketing, business development, licensing, product planning, strategic marketing, strategic planning and operations. Most recently, Ms. Kelleher was employed as senior director of licensing at G.D. Searle, the pharmaceutical division of Monsanto. Philip Fox joined The Company as Director, Research and Development in January 1999. Prior to that, he was at the National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research since 1976. During his NIH tenure, he served as Clinical Director of the Intramural Research Program, and Chief of the Clinical Investigations Section, Gene Therapy and Therapeutics Branch. Dr. Fox is an oral/maxillofacial surgeon and a diplomate of the American Board of Oral Medicine. Martin Cummins has held several positions within the Company since joining the Company full-time in June 1992. Mr. Cummins currently oversees all research studies involving human participants as Clinical Project Director. Martin Cummins is the son of Joseph Cummins. The Company's directors are elected at the annual meeting of shareholders to hold office until the annual meeting of shareholders for the ensuing year or until their successors have been duly elected and qualified. Until October of 1999, the Company paid directors who were not employees of the Company a fee of $1,000 per regularly scheduled Board meeting attended, or $250 for participation in a regularly scheduled Board meeting by conference telephone. Commencing October 29, 1999, each director receives 1,500 options for physical attendance, and 375 options for telephone participation, at a maximum of one (1) meeting per quarter. The options are granted at December 31 of the year during which they are earned, and are exercisable at the fair market value of the stock on the date of grant. The directors no longer receive payment of fees for attendance at meetings; however, they are reimbursed for any out-of-pocket expenses in connection with their attendance at meetings. Officers are elected annually by the Board of Directors and serve at the discretion of the Board. COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 16(a) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act") requires directors and officers of the Company and persons who own more than 10 percent of the 15 16 Company's common stock to file with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Commission") initial reports of ownership and reports of changes in ownership of the common stock. Directors, officers and more than 10 percent shareholders are required by the Exchange Act to furnish the Company with copies of all Section 16(a) forms they file. During 2000, Dr. Dennis Moore, a director of the Company, was late filing three (3) Form 4's (Statements of Changes in Beneficial Ownership) within the time period required by Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act. Said Form 4's were duly filed on December 15, 2000, and to the Company's knowledge, there are no remaining delinquencies. Other than mentioned above, to the Company's knowledge based solely on a review of the copies of such reports furnished to the Company, all filings applicable to its directors, officers and more than 10% beneficial owners were timely filed. ITEM 10. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION. The following table sets forth for the three years ended December 31, 2000 compensation paid by the Company to its Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer, and to its Chief Operating Officer. None of the Company's other executive officers had annual salary and bonus in excess of $100,000 for services rendered during any of the three years ended December 31, 2000. SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE
Annual Compensation ------------------------------------------------------------ NAME AND PRINCIPAL POSITION YEAR SALARY BONUS OTHER COMPENSATION ------------------------------------------ -------- ----------------- -------------- --------------------- Dr. Joseph Cummins, Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer.............. 2000 $ 25,935 $ - $ - 1999 150,000 $ - $ - 1998 150,000 $ - $ - Kathleen Kelleher, Chief Operating Officer and Vice- President of Business Development.......................... 2000 123,043 $ - $ - 1999 150,000 $ - $ -
OPTION GRANTS IN 2000 The following table sets forth certain information relating to options granted in 2000 to the executive officers named above, to purchase shares of common stock of the Company. 16 17
NUMBER OF SHARES OF COMMON STOCK % OF TOTAL UNDERLYING OPTIONS GRANTED EXERCISE OR OPTIONS TO EMPLOYEES BASE PRICE EXPIRATION NAME GRANTED (#) IN 2000 ($/SH) DATE -------------------------------------- ------------------ -------------------- -------------- ---------------- Kathleen Kelleher..................... 8,000 100% $2.75 (1) 1-19-04
(1) The fair market value of the common stock on the date of the grant. AGGREGATED OPTION EXERCISES AT DECEMBER 31, 2000 AND YEAR-END OPTION VALUES The following table sets forth information for the executive officers named above, regarding the exercise of options during 2000 and unexercised options held at the end of 2000.
NUMBER OF SHARES OF VALUE OF UNEXERCISED COMMON STOCK UNDERLYING IN-THE-MONEY SHARES UNEXERCISED OPTIONS AT OPTIONS AT ACQUIRED ON VALUE DECEMBER 31, 2000 (#) DECEMBER 31, 2000 ($) (1) NAME EXERCISE (#) REALIZED ($) EXERCISABLE/UNEXERCISABLE EXERCISABLE/UNEXERCISABLE ------------------------------ ------------- ------------- --------------------------- ---------------------------- Joseph Cummins - - 282,750 / 1,750 $47,000 / None Kathleen Kelleher - - 77,333 / 66,667 $6,768 / None
(1) Calculated based on the closing price of the common stock ($1.063) as reported by OTC BB on December 31, 2000. DIRECTOR COMPENSATION FOR LAST FISCAL YEAR
Cash Compensation Security Grants ----------------------------------------- --------------------- NUMBER OF SECURITIES MEETING CONSULTING UNDERLYING NAME FEES (1) FEES (2) OPTIONS (3) ----------------------------------------------------- ---------------- ----------------- --------------------- Edward Amento, MD $ - $ - 2,625 Stephen Chen, PhD - - 3,750 James Cook - - 3,750 Thomas D'Alonzo - 1,000 2,625 Katsuaki Hayashibara - - 3,750 Dennis Moore, DVM - - 3,750 James Page, MD - - 3,750
(1) Directors do not receive cash compensation for attendance at directors' meetings, but each director receives 1,500 options for physical attendance, and 375 options for telephone participation, at a maximum of one (1) meeting per quarter. The options are granted at December 31 of the year during which they are earned, and are exercisable at the fair market value of the stock on the date of grant. (2) Each director receives $1,200 per day, prorated for partial days, for employment on special projects or assignments. (3) Includes options granted for participation in meetings; see Note (1), above. 17 18 ITEM 11. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT. As of December 31, 2000, there were 7,807,357 shares of the Company's common stock outstanding. The following table sets forth as of December 31, 2000, the beneficial ownership of each person who owns more than 5% of such outstanding common stock:
NAME AND ADDRESS NUMBER OF SHARES PERCENT OF TOTAL ----------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------- ----------------------- Hayashibara Biochemical Laboratories, Inc. 2-3 Shimoishii 1-chome Okayama 700, Japan 3,290,781 42.1% Dr. Joseph Cummins 800 West 9th Avenue Amarillo, Texas 79101 549,214 (1) 7.0%
(1) Includes an aggregate of 181,704 shares of common stock held by Joseph Cummins as trustee under certain trusts for the benefit of his children and 10,000 shares owned by Dr. Cummins' wife. The following table sets forth the beneficial ownership of the Company's stock as of December 31, 2000 by each executive officer and director, and by all executive officers and directors as a group:
DIRECTORS NUMBER OF SHARES PERCENT OF TOTAL --------------------------------------------- -------------------------- ----------------------- Joseph Cummins 549,214 (1) 7.0% Dennis Moore 84,616 1.1% James Cook 66,600 (2) * Katsuaki Hayashibara 48,240 * Kathleen Kelleher 21,390 * Stephen Chen 13,500 * Thomas D'Alonzo 3,000 * Edward Amento - - James Page - - Total Group (all directors and 786,560 8.1% executive officers - 11 persons)
* Less than 1% (1) Includes an aggregate of 181,704 shares of common stock held by Joseph Cummins as trustee under certain trusts for the benefit of his children and 10,000 shares owned by Dr. Cummins' wife. (2) All of such shares are owned jointly with Mr. Cook's wife. 18 19 ITEM 12. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS The Company has relied significantly on HBL, the largest shareholder of the Company, for a substantial portion of its capital requirements. Pursuant to the Development Agreement described at Item 1 of Part 1, above, HBL advanced $9,000,000 for funding of research. In addition, HBL has purchased substantial amounts of the Company's common stock from time to time, to the point where it now owns 42.1% of the issued and outstanding shares of common stock of the Company. HBL loaned $1 million to the Company on November 30, 1999, and an additional $1 million on February 29, 2000, both loans bearing interest at 4.5% per annum. The aggregate balance on both notes at December 31, 2000, including principal and accrued interest, was $2,086,351. In addition to the above, HBL and the Company are parties to various license and manufacturing and supply agreements pursuant to which the Company licenses certain technology to or from HBL. HBL supplies formulations of its interferon alpha and other products to the Company. During 2000, the Company has used the law firm of Sprouse, Smith & Rowley, P.C. Mr. Edward Morris, Secretary of the Company, is a partner in the firm. In 2000, the Company was invoiced $110,320 by said firm. On March 25, 1999, ABI signed a contract with PPD Pharmaco, Inc., now known as PPD Development, Inc. to provide clinical monitoring and data entry services for ABI's Phase III clinical trials in Sjogren's syndrome. During the year ended December 31, 2000, the Company paid $816,552 for clinical research organization services to PPD Development, Inc. At the time that the contract was signed, Mr. Tom D'Alonzo was President and Chief Operating Officer of PPD and its Clinical Research Organization subsidiary, PPD Development, Inc., and was also a member of the ABI Board of Directors. Mr. D'Alonzo retired from PPD Development, Inc. in October, 1999. Mr. D'Alonzo is still a member of the ABI Board of Directors. All future transactions and loans between the Company and its officers, directors and 5% shareholders will be on terms no less favorable to the Company than could be obtained from independent third parties. There can be no assurance, however, that future transactions or arrangements between the Company and its affiliates will be advantageous, that conflicts of interest will not arise with respect thereto or that if conflicts do arise, that they will be resolved in favor of the Company. 19 20 ITEM 13. EXHIBITS AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K. EXHIBIT INDEX
NUMBER DESCRIPTION ---------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 3.1+ Restated Articles of Incorporation of the Company, dated June 22, 1999. 3.3* Bylaws of the Company. 4.1* Specimen Common Stock Certificate. 4.2* Form of Underwriter's Warrant. 10.1* Agreement dated as of April 1, 1984 between University Patents, Inc. and the Company. 10.2* License Agreement dated as of March 22, 1988 between the Company and The Texas A&M University System. 10.3* License Agreement dated October 20, 1989 between the Company and ISI. 10.4* Manufacturing and Supply Agreement dated October 20, 1989 between the Company and ISI. 10.5* Joint Development and Manufacturing/Supply Agreement dated March 13, 1992 between the Company and HBL, as amended. 10.7* Japan Animal Health License Agreement dated January 20, 1993 between the Company and HBL. 10.9* Employment Agreement dated as of March 4, 1994 between the Company and Dr. Joseph M. Cummins, as amended. 10.11* Manufacturing/Supply Agreement dated June 1, 1994 between the Company and HBL. 10.12* Settlement Agreement dated April 27, 1995 among the Company, ISI, Pharma Pacific Management Pty. Ltd. ("PPM"), Pharma Pacific Pty. Ltd., Pharma Pacific Ltd., and Fernz Corporation Limited. 10.13* Amendment of ACC/ISI License Agreement dated April 27, 1995 between the Company and ISI. 10.14* PPM/ACC Sub-license Agreement dated April 27, 1995 between PPM and the Company. 10.18* Form of Consulting Agreement between the Company and the Underwriter. 10.20+ 1996 Employee Stock Option Plan, Amended and Restated as of May 11, 1999. 10.21+ Outside Director and Advisor Stock Option Plan, Amended and Restated as of May 11, 1999. 10.22* Form of Indemnification Agreement between the Company and officers and directors of the Company. 10.23* Indemnification Agreement between HBL and the Company. 10.26** License Agreement dated July 22, 1997, between Hoffmann-La Roche Inc., and the Company. 10.27** Distribution Agreement dated January 12, 1998, between Global Damon Pharmaceutical and the Company.
20 21
NUMBER DESCRIPTION ---------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 10.28** Distribution Agreement dated September 17, 1997, between HBL and the Company (TNF-A). 10.29** Distribution Agreement dated September 17, 1997, between HBL and the Company (IFN-G). 10.30*** Amendment No. 1 dated September 28, 1998 to License Agreement of March 22, 1988, between The Texas A&M University System and the Company. 10.36 License Agreement dated February 1, 2000 between Molecular Medicine Research Institute, and the Company (IFN-G administered orally). 10.37(a) License and Supply Agreement dated April 3, 2000 with Key Oncologics (Pty) Ltd., and the Company. 10.38 Amendment No. 1 dated April 4, 2000, to Interferon-G Distribution Agreement dated September 17, 1997 between HBL and the Company (IFN-G). 10.39(a) License and Supply Agreement dated April 25, 2000 between Biopharm for Scientific Research and Drug Industry Development and the Company. 10.40(a) Sales Agreement dated May 5, 2000, between Wilke Resources, Inc. and the Company. 10.41 Engagement Agreement dated September 26, 2000, between Hunter Wise Financial Group, LLC, and the Company. 10.42(a) Supply Agreement (Anhydrous Crystalline Maltose) dated October 13, 2000, between Hayashibara Biochemical Laboratories, Inc., and the Company. 10.43(a) Supply Agreement dated December 11, 2000, between Natrol, Inc., and the Company. 21. Subsidiaries of the Company. The following sets forth the name and jurisdiction of incorporation of each subsidiary of the Company. All of such subsidiaries are wholly- owned by the Company. NAME JURISDICTION OF INCORPORATION ---------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------- VANGUARD BIOSCIENCES, INC. TEXAS VELDONA USA, INC. TEXAS VELDONA AFRICA, INC. TEXAS VELDONA POLAND, INC. TEXAS ABI TAIWAN, INC. TEXAS AMARILLO CELL OF CANADA, INC. TEXAS 23.1 Consent of Ernst & Young LLP.
*The Exhibit is incorporated by reference to the exhibit of the same number to the Company's Registration Statement on Form SB-2 filed with and declared effective by the Commission (File No. 333-4413) on August 8, 1996. **The Exhibit is incorporated by reference to the Company's 1997 Annual Report on Form 10-KSB filed with the Commission on or before March 31, 1998. ***The Exhibit is incorporated by reference to the Company's 1998 Annual Report on Form 10-KSB filed with the Commission on or before March 31, 1999. +The Exhibit is incorporated by reference to the Company's Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarterly period ended June 30, 1999, filed with the Commission on August 12, 1999, and subsequently amended on September 13, 1999. (a)Portions of this exhibit have been omitted and filed separately with the commission. 21 22 REPORTS ON FORM 8-K A report on Form 8-K was filed on February 11, 2000, relating to an Agreement to Convert Debt between Amarillo Biosciences, Inc. and Hayashibara Biochemical Laboratories, Inc., dated September 30, 1999, reporting that the exchange called for by said Agreement to take place on February 29, 2000, in which Hayashibara Biochemical Laboratories, Inc. would contribute $1 million to the Company and receive an equivalent amount of the Company's common stock, would not take place, but instead, by mutual consent of the parties, Hayashibara Biochemical Laboratories, Inc. agreed to loan $1 million to the Company at an interest rate of 4.5% per annum payable on or before February 29, 2005, or one (1) year after FDA approval of a drug containing Hayashibara's interferon alpha for oral administration to humans, whichever should occur first. 22 23 SIGNATURES Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized. AMARILLO BIOSCIENCES, INC. By: /s/ JOSEPH M. CUMMINS ----------------------------------- Joseph M. Cummins, Chairman of the Board, President, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Executive Officer Date: April 12, 2001 --------------------- Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
Signature Title Date --------- ----- ---- /s/ JOSEPH M. CUMMINS Chairman of the Board, 12 April 2001 ----------------------------------------------------------- President, Chief Financial --------------------------- Joseph M. Cummins Officer, Director and Chief Executive Officer /s/ EDWARD P. AMENTO Director 12 April 2001 ----------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------- Edward P. Amento /s/ STEPHEN T. CHEN Director 12 April 2001 ----------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------- Stephen T. Chen /s/ JAMES COOK Director 12 April 2001 ----------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------- James Cook /s/ THOMAS W. D'ALONZO Director 12 April 2001 ----------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------- Thomas W. D'Alonzo /s/ KATSUAKI HAYASHIBARA Director 11 April 2001 ----------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------- Katsuaki Hayashibara /s/ DENNIS MOORE Director 12 April 2001 ----------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------- Dennis Moore /s/ JAMES A. PAGE Director 11 April 2001 ----------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------- James A. Page
24 Amarillo Biosciences, Inc. and Subsidiaries (companies in the development stage) Consolidated Financial Statements Year ended December 31, 2000 CONTENTS Report of Independent Auditors ..........................................................................................F-1 Audited Consolidated Financial Statements Consolidated Balance Sheets .............................................................................................F-2 Consolidated Statements of Operations ...................................................................................F-3 Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity (Deficit) ...............................................................F-4 Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows ...................................................................................F-7 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements ..............................................................................F-9
25 Report of Ernst & Young, LLP, Independent Auditors The Board of Directors Amarillo Biosciences, Inc. We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Amarillo Biosciences, Inc. and subsidiaries (companies in the development stage) as of December 31, 2000 and 1999, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity (deficit) and cash flows for each of the two years in the period ended December 31, 2000 and for the period from June 25, 1984 (inception) through December 31, 2000. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. The financial statements for the period June 25, 1984 (inception) through December 31, 1991, were audited by other auditors whose report dated July 12, 1992, which has been furnished to us, expressed an unqualified opinion on those statements. The financial statements for the period June 25, 1984 (inception) through December 31, 1991, include total revenues and net loss of $643,566 and $3,901,236, respectively. Our opinion on the statements of operations, stockholders' equity (deficit), and cash flows for the period June 25, 1984 (inception) through December 31, 2000, insofar as it relates to amounts for prior periods through December 31, 1991, is based solely on the report of other auditors. We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits and the report of other auditors provide a reasonable basis for our opinion. In our opinion, based on our audits and the report of other auditors, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Amarillo Biosciences, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2000 and 1999, and the consolidated results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the two years in the period ended December 31, 2000, and the period from June 25, 1984 (inception) through December 31, 2000, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. As discussed in Note 1 to the financial statements, the Company's recurring losses from operations and the need to raise additional financing in order to satisfy its vendors and other creditors and execute its 2001 Plan raise substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. (Management's plans as to these matters are also described in Note 1.) The 2000 financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty. ERNST & YOUNG LLP Dallas, Texas March 21, 2001 F-1 26 Amarillo Biosciences, Inc. and Subsidiaries (companies in the development stage) Consolidated Balance Sheets
DECEMBER 31, ------------------------------------------------- 2000 1999 ------------------------------------------------- ASSETS Current assets: Cash and cash equivalents $ 341,983 $ 1,302,343 Inventory 55,839 48,639 Other current assets 45,500 32,137 ------------------------------------------------- Total current assets 443,322 1,383,119 Property and equipment, net 93,236 105,799 Patents, net of accumulated amortization of $101,221 and $89,807 in 2000 and 1999, respectively 107,323 73,495 ------------------------------------------------- Total assets $ 643,881 $ 1,562,413 ================================================= LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT Current liabilities: Accounts payable $ 957,489 $ 521,199 Accrued interest expense 86,351 3,526 Accrued legal expense - 3,025 Accrued vacation - 19,000 Other accrued expense 14,724 63,173 ------------------------------------------------- Total current liabilities 1,058,564 609,923 Notes payable to stockholder 2,000,000 1,000,000 ------------------------------------------------- Total liabilities 3,058,564 1,609,923 Commitments and contingencies Stockholders' deficit Preferred stock, $.01 par value: Authorized shares - 10,000,000 Issued shares - none - - Common stock, $.01 par value: Authorized shares - 20,000,000 Issued shares - 7,807,357 in 2000 and 7,472,157 in 1999 78,074 74,722 Additional paid-in capital 18,399,449 17,374,570 Deficit accumulated during the development stage (20,892,206) (17,496,802) ------------------------------------------------- Total stockholders' deficit (2,414,683) (47,510) ------------------------------------------------- Total liabilities and stockholders' deficit $ 643,881 $ 1,562,413 =================================================
See accompanying notes. F-2 27 Amarillo Biosciences, Inc. and Subsidiaries (companies in the development stage) Consolidated Statements of Operations
CUMULATIVE FROM JUNE 25, 1984 (INCEPTION) YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, THROUGH ---------------------------------------------- DECEMBER 31, 2000 1999 2000 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Revenues: Contract revenues $ - $ - $ 9,000,000 Interferon sales - - 420,974 Interest income 47,017 111,368 1,573,022 Sublicense fees - - 113,334 Royalty income - - 31,544 Gain (loss) on ISI stock 4,909 (5,735) 113,146 Other 1,830 2,400 608,661 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 53,756 108,033 11,860,681 Expenses: Research and development expenses 2,276,504 4,732,365 18,361,313 Selling, general, and administrative expenses 1,089,832 1,456,072 13,418,624 Interest expense 82,824 38,182 937,950 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 3,449,160 6,226,619 32,717,887 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Loss before income taxes (3,395,404) (6,118,586) (20,857,206) Income tax expense - - 35,000 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Net loss $ (3,395,404) $ (6,118,586) $ (20,892,206) ====================================================================== Basic and diluted net loss per share $ (0.44) $ (0.96) =============================================== Weighted average shares outstanding 7,715,086 6,362,047 ===============================================
See accompanying notes. F-3 28 Amarillo Biosciences, Inc. and Subsidiaries (companies in the development stage) Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity (Deficit) Cumulative from June 25, 1984 (Inception) through December 31, 2000
COMMON STOCK ADDITIONAL ISSUANCE ------------------------------------- PAID IN PRICE SHARES AMOUNT CAPITAL -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1984 Initial issuance for cash $0.29 84,000 $ 840 $ 23,660 Initial issuance in exchange for legal fees 0.29 30,000 300 8,450 Initial issuance in exchange for services and research and development costs 0.01 1,086,000 10,860 (9,955) 1985 Issuance for cash 0.83 102,000 1,020 83,980 Issuance in exchange for professional fees, salaries and research services 0.83 10,800 108 8,892 1986 Issuance in exchange for professional fees, salaries and services 0.83 22,800 228 18,772 Treasury stock purchase; 11,040 shares at cost - - - Issuance for cash 0.83-1.25 182,352 1,824 154,626 Issuance in exchange for professional fees, salaries and research services 0.83 19,020 190 15,660 1987 Issuance for cash 1.25-2.08 309,648 3,096 445,974 Treasury stock purchase; 2,400 shares at cost - - - 1988 Issuance for cash 1.88 120,972 1,210 225,613 1989 Issuance for cash 2.08 2,568 26 5,324 Issuance for cash 2.50 227,748 2,277 567,093 1990 Issuance for cash 1.72-2.50 592,584 5,926 1,108,634 Issuance for cash 4.17 174,000 1,740 723,260 Issuance in exchange for note receivable from stockholder 2.50 54,540 545 135,805 1991 Repayment of note receivable from stockholder - - - Net loss and total comprehensive loss cumulative from June 25, 1984 (inception) through December 31, 1991 - - - DEFICIT ACCUMULATED NOTE DURING THE UNREALIZED RECEIVABLE DEVELOPMENT GAIN (LOSS) FROM TREASURY STAGE ON INVESTMENT STOCKHOLDER STOCK ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1984 Initial issuance for cash $ - $ - $ - $ - Initial issuance in exchange for legal fees - - - - Initial issuance in exchange for services and research and development costs - - - - 1985 Issuance for cash - - - - Issuance in exchange for professional fees, salaries and research services - - - - 1986 Issuance in exchange for professional fees, salaries and services - - - - Treasury stock purchase; 11,040 shares at cost - - - (22,500) Issuance for cash - - - - Issuance in exchange for professional fees, salaries and research services - - - - 1987 Issuance for cash - - - - Treasury stock purchase; 2,400 shares at cost - - - (3,500) 1988 Issuance for cash - - - - 1989 Issuance for cash - - - - Issuance for cash - - - - 1990 Issuance for cash - - - - Issuance for cash - - - - Issuance in exchange for note receivable from stockholder - - (136,350) - 1991 Repayment of note receivable from stockholder - - 136,350 - Net loss and total comprehensive loss cumulative from June 25, 1984 (inception) through December 31, 1991 (3,901,236) - - - TOTAL STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (DEFICIT) ------------------- 1984 Initial issuance for cash $ 24,500 Initial issuance in exchange for legal fees 8,750 Initial issuance in exchange for services and research and development costs 905 1985 Issuance for cash 85,000 Issuance in exchange for professional fees, salaries and research services 9,000 1986 Issuance in exchange for professional fees, salaries and services 19,000 Treasury stock purchase; 11,040 shares at cost (22,500) Issuance for cash 156,450 Issuance in exchange for professional fees, salaries and research services 15,850 1987 Issuance for cash 449,070 Treasury stock purchase; 2,400 shares at cost (3,500) 1988 Issuance for cash 226,823 1989 Issuance for cash 5,350 Issuance for cash 569,370 1990 Issuance for cash 1,114,560 Issuance for cash 725,000 Issuance in exchange for note receivable from stockholder - 1991 Repayment of note receivable from stockholder 136,350 Net loss and total comprehensive loss cumulative from June 25, 1984 (inception) through December 31, 1991 (3,901,236)
F-4 29 Amarillo Biosciences, Inc. and Subsidiaries (companies in the development stage) Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity (Deficit)(continued) Cumulative from June 25, 1984 (Inception) through December 31,2000
COMMON STOCK ADDITIONAL ISSUANCE -------------------------------------- PAID IN PRICE SHARES AMOUNT CAPITAL --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1992 Net loss and total comprehensive loss for year ended December 31, 1992 - $ - $ - -------------------------------------------------------------- Balance at December 31, 1992 3,019,032 30,190 3,515,788 1993 Net loss and total comprehensive loss for year ended December 31, 1993 - - - -------------------------------------------------------------- Balance at December 31, 1993 3,019,032 30,190 3,515,788 1994 Net loss and total comprehensive loss for year ended December 31, 1994 - - - Adjustment to unrealized loss on investments - - - Total comprehensive loss -------------------------------------------------------------- Balance at December 31, 1994 3,019,032 30,190 3,515,788 1995 Issuance for stock grant $ 2.50 29,640 297 73,803 Net loss for year ended December 31, 1995 - - - Adjustment to unrealized loss on investments - - - Total comprehensive loss -------------------------------------------------------------- Balance at December 31, 1995 3,048,672 30,487 3,589,591 1996 Issuance for cash 5.00 2,300,000 23,000 9,354,502 Issuance for stock grant 5.00 79,000 790 394,210 Warrants issued for cash - - 200 Cancellation of treasury stock (13,440) (135) (25,865) Net loss for year ended December 31, 1996 - - - Adjustment to unrealized loss on investments - - - Total comprehensive loss -------------------------------------------------------------- Balance at December 31, 1996 5,414,232 54,142 13,312,638 1997 Net loss for year ended December 31, 1997 - - - Adjustment to unrealized gain (loss) on investment - - - Total comprehensive loss Options issued for professional services - - 79,500 -------------------------------------------------------------- Balance at December 31, 1997 5,414,232 54,142 13,392,138 DEFICIT ACCUMULATED NOTE DURING THE UNREALIZED RECEIVABLE DEVELOPMENT GAIN (LOSS) FROM STAGE ON INVESTMENT STOCKHOLDER -------------------------------------------------------------------- 1992 Net loss and total comprehensive loss for year ended December 31, 1992 $ (505,558) $ - $ - -------------------------------------------------------------------- Balance at December 31, 1992 (4,406,794) - - 1993 Net loss and total comprehensive loss for year ended December 31, 1993 (108,363) - - -------------------------------------------------------------------- Balance at December 31, 1993 (4,515,157) - - 1994 Net loss and total comprehensive loss for year ended December 31, 1994 (129,239) - - Adjustment to unrealized loss on investments - (57,316) - Total comprehensive loss -------------------------------------------------------------------- Balance at December 31, 1994 (4,644,396) (57,316) - 1995 Issuance for stock grant - - - Net loss for year ended December 31, 1995 (311,579) - - Adjustment to unrealized loss on investments - 57,316 - Total comprehensive loss -------------------------------------------------------------------- Balance at December 31, 1995 (4,955,975) - - 1996 Issuance for cash - - - Issuance for stock grant - - - Warrants issued for cash - - - Cancellation of treasury stock - - - Net loss for year ended December 31, 1996 (1,618,188) - - Adjustment to unrealized loss on investments - (3,500) - Total comprehensive loss -------------------------------------------------------------------- Balance at December 31, 1996 (6,574,163) (3,500) - 1997 Net loss for year ended December 31, 1997 (2,471,252) - - Adjustment to unrealized gain (loss) on investment - 37,198 - Total comprehensive loss Options issued for professional services - - - -------------------------------------------------------------------- Balance at December 31, 1997 (9,045,415) 33,698 - TOTAL TREASURY STOCKHOLDERS' STOCK EQUITY (DEFICIT) ---------------------------------------- 1992 Net loss and total comprehensive loss for year ended December 31, 1992 $ - $ (505,558) ---------------------------------------- Balance at December 31, 1992 (26,000) (886,816) 1993 Net loss and total comprehensive loss for year ended December 31, 1993 - (108,363) ---------------------------------------- Balance at December 31, 1993 (26,000) (995,179) 1994 Net loss and total comprehensive loss for year ended December 31, 1994 - (129,239) Adjustment to unrealized loss on investments - (57,316) -------------------- Total comprehensive loss (186,555) ---------------------------------------- Balance at December 31, 1994 (26,000) (1,181,734) 1995 Issuance for stock grant - 74,100 Net loss for year ended December 31, 1995 - (311,579) Adjustment to unrealized loss on investments - 57,316 -------------------- Total comprehensive loss (254,263) ---------------------------------------- Balance at December 31, 1995 (26,000) (1,361,897) 1996 Issuance for cash - 9,377,502 Issuance for stock grant - 395,000 Warrants issued for cash - 200 Cancellation of treasury stock 26,000 - Net loss for year ended December 31, 1996 - (1,618,188) Adjustment to unrealized loss on investments - (3,500) -------------------- Total comprehensive loss (1,621,688) ---------------------------------------- Balance at December 31, 1996 - 6,789,117 1997 Net loss for year ended December 31, 1997 - (2,471,252) Adjustment to unrealized gain (loss) on investment - 37,198 -------------------- Total comprehensive loss (2,434,054) -------------------- Options issued for professional services - 79,500 ---------------------------------------- Balance at December 31, 1997 - 4,434,563
F-5 30 Amarillo Biosciences, Inc. and Subsidiaries (companies in the development stage) Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity (Deficit)(continued) Cumulative from June 25, 1984 (Inception) through December 31,2000
COMMON STOCK ADDITIONAL ISSUANCE -------------------------------- PAID IN PRICE SHARES AMOUNT CAPITAL -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1998 Net loss for year ended December 31, 1998 - $ - $ - Adjustment to unrealized gain (loss) on investment - - - Total comprehensive loss ------------------------------------------------------- Balance at December 31, 1998 5,414,232 54,142 13,392,138 1999 Net loss and total comprehensive loss for year ended December 31, 1999 - - - Issuance in exchange for note payable to stockholder $ 2.9992 946,094 9,461 2,828,065 Issuance in exchange for note payable to stockholder 0.9044 1,111,831 11,119 994,367 Options issued for professional services - - 160,000 ------------------------------------------------------- Balance at December 31, 1999 7,472,157 74,722 17,374,570 2000 Net loss and total comprehensive loss for year ended December 31, 2000 - - - Issuance of common stock and warrants for cash 2.50 316,000 3,160 786,840 in private placement Exercise of employee stock options 0.875 19,200 192 16,608 Employee options granted in lieu of salary - - 221,431 ------------------------------------------------------- Balance at December 31, 2000 7,807,357 $ 78,074 $ 18,399,449 ======================================================= DEFICIT ACCUMULATED NOTE DURING THE UNREALIZED RECEIVABLE DEVELOPMENT GAIN (LOSS) FROM TREASURY STAGE ON INVESTMENT STOCKHOLDER STOCK ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1998 Net loss for year ended December 31, 1998 $ (2,332,801) $ - $ - $ - Adjustment to unrealized gain (loss) on investment - (33,698) - - Total comprehensive loss ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Balance at December 31, 1998 (11,378,216) - - - 1999 Net loss and total comprehensive loss for year ended December 31, 1999 (6,118,586) - - - Issuance in exchange for note payable to stockholder - - - - Issuance in exchange for note payable to stockholder - - - - Options issued for professional services - - - - ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Balance at December 31, 1999 (17,496,802) - - - 2000 Net loss and total comprehensive loss for year ended December 31, 2000 (3,395,404) - - - Issuance of common stock and warrants for cash in private placement - - - - Exercise of employee stock options - - - - Employee options granted in lieu of salary - - - - ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Balance at December 31, 2000 $ (20,892,206) $ - $ - $ - ============================================================================== TOTAL STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (DEFICIT) ------------------- 1998 Net loss for year ended December 31, 1998 $ (2,332,801) Adjustment to unrealized gain (loss) on investment (33,698) ------------------- Total comprehensive loss (2,366,499) ------------------- Balance at December 31, 1998 2,068,064 1999 Net loss and total comprehensive loss for year ended December 31, 1999 (6,118,586) Issuance in exchange for note payable to stockholder 2,837,526 Issuance in exchange for note payable to stockholder 1,005,486 Options issued for professional services 160,000 ------------------- Balance at December 31, 1999 (47,510) 2000 Net loss and total comprehensive loss for year ended December 31, 2000 (3,395,404) Issuance of common stock and warrants for cash 790,000 in private placement Exercise of employee stock options 16,800 Employee options granted in lieu of salary 221,431 ------------------- Balance at December 31, 2000 $ (2,414,683) ===================
See accompanying notes. F-6 31 Amarillo Biosciences, Inc. and Subsidiaries (companies in the development stage) Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
CUMULATIVE FROM JUNE 25, 1984 (INCEPTION) YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, THROUGH -------------------------------------------------- DECEMBER 31, 2000 1999 2000 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ OPERATING ACTIVITIES Net loss $ (3,395,404) $ (6,118,586) $ (20,892,206) Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities: Loss on impairment of ISI stock - 5,735 80,325 Depreciation 12,563 17,092 220,121 Amortization 11,414 8,630 112,261 Discount on investment in ISI - - 24,675 Recognition of deferred sub-license fees - - (32,844) Organization costs - - (11,040) Gain (loss) on sale of assets - - (7,373) Common stock issued for stock grant - - 469,100 Common stock issued for services - - 53,505 Options issued for services - 160,000 239,500 Options issued for wages 221,431 - 221,431 Changes in operating assets and liabilities: Inventory (7,200) (48,639) (55,839) Other current assets (13,363) 11,278 (45,500) Accounts payable 436,290 432,279 957,489 Accrued expenses 12,351 (140,354) 101,075 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Net cash used in operating activities (2,721,918) (5,672,565) (18,565,320) INVESTING ACTIVITIES Capital expenditures - (6,130) (329,055) Proceeds from sale of equipment - - 23,071 Patents (45,242) (38,302) (208,544) Investment in ISI common stock - - (105,000) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Net cash used in investing activities (45,242) (44,432) (619,528) ------------------------------------------------------------------------
F-7 32 Amarillo Biosciences, Inc. and Subsidiaries (companies in the development stage) Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (continued)
CUMULATIVE FROM JUNE 25, 1984 (INCEPTION) YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, THROUGH ------------------------------------------------ DECEMBER 31, 2000 1999 2000 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ FINANCING ACTIVITIES Receipt of sub-license fees $ - $ - $ 32,844 Proceeds from notes payable 1,000,000 1,000,000 2,000,000 Issuance of common stock and warrants 806,800 1,243,012 17,493,987 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Net cash provided by financing activities 1,806,800 2,243,012 19,526,831 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents (960,360) (3,473,985) 341,983 Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period 1,302,343 4,776,328 - ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Cash and cash equivalents at end of period $ 341,983 $ 1,302,343 $ 341,983 ======================================================================== SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION Cash paid for income taxes $ - $ - $ 37,084 ======================================================================== Cash paid for interest $ - $ - $ 6,466 ========================================================================
See accompanying notes. F-8 33 Amarillo Biosciences, Inc. and Subsidiaries (companies in the development stage) Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements December 31, 2000 1. ORGANIZATION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES ORGANIZATION AND BUSINESS Amarillo Biosciences, Inc. (the "Company" or "ABI"), a development-stage company incorporated in 1984, is engaged in developing biologics for the treatment of human and animal diseases. The Company is currently conducting clinical studies as part of the process of obtaining regulatory approval from the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA), so that commercial marketing can begin in the United States. Among other activities the Company recently concluded a Phase III clinical trial, initiated during November, 1998, using low dose oral IFN[alpha] for the treatment of Sjogren's syndrome. The analyses of these Phase III data continues and are expected to be completed in the second quarter of 2001. The Company's viability is dependent upon successful commercialization of products resulting from its research and product development activities. The Company plans on working with commercial development partners in the United States and in other parts of the world to provide the necessary sales, marketing, and distribution infrastructure to successfully commercialize the IFN[alpha] product for both human and animal applications. All of the Company's products will require significant additional development, laboratory and clinical testing and investment prior to the Company obtaining regulatory approval to commercially market its product(s). Accordingly, for at least the next few years, the Company will continue to incur research and development and general and administrative expenses and likely will not generate sufficient revenues from product sales to support its operations. The Company has been dependent upon financing from its stockholders. The Company's development-stage-through-1991 activities were financed primarily through the issuance of common stock. From 1991 to August 1996, such activities were financed under an agreement (described in Note 4) with a major stockholder. In August 1996, the Company completed its initial public offering, receiving net proceeds of approximately $9,378,000. The Company's 2001 Plan of Operations calls for the Company to expend approximately $1.7 million in 2001.At December 31, 2000, the Company had available cash of $341,983 and negative working capital of approximately ($615,000). The Company's continued losses and lack of liquidity indicate that the Company may not be able to continue as a going concern for a reasonable period of time. The Company's ability to continue as a going concern is dependent upon several factors including, but not limited to, the continued non-demand for immediate payment of outstanding indebtedness by the Company's vendors and suppliers, the Company's ability to generate sufficient cash flows to meet its obligations on a timely basis, obtain additional financing, and continue to obtain supplies and services from its vendors. The Company will need to raise additional funds in order to satisfy its vendors and creditors and execute its 2001 Plan. The F-9 34 Amarillo Biosciences, Inc. and Subsidiaries (companies in the development stage) Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued) December 31, 2000 1. ORGANIZATION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED) Company is presently negotiating with human health and animal health commercial development partners in various regions of the world including the United States, Canada, Europe, and the Middle East. The Company believes that one or more of these agreements will be executed during 2001. These agreements could generally include provisions for the commercial partner to pay ABI a technology access fee, could include payments for a portion of the clinical trial expenses, could include payment obligations to ABI upon the accomplishment of certain defined tasks, and/or could provide for payments relating to the future sales of commercial product. These agreements could be an important source of funds for ABI. Management believes the fact that it has concluded an advanced Phase III clinical trial significantly enhances its ability to successfully raise additional funds from its commercial partnering activities and from private investors. However, there can be no assurance that the Company will be successful in obtaining additional funding from either human health and animal health commercial development partners or private investors. If the Company is not successful in raising additional funds, it will need to significantly curtail clinical trial expenditures and to further reduce staff and administrative expenses and may be forced to cease operations. Furthermore, the Company's creditors could demand the Company's obligations to them be satisfied immediately. Should this event occur, the Company could be forced to file for protection under Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code if it were not able to obtain alternative sources of financing. Additionally, the recorded value of the Company's patents and property and equipment may not be recoverable in the event future operations are not sustainable. PRINCIPLES OF CONSOLIDATION The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries, Amarillo Cell of Canada, Inc., Veldona Africa, Inc., Veldona Poland, Inc., Veldona USA, Inc., Vanguard Biosciences, Inc. and ABI Taiwan, Inc. (all Texas corporations). All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. The effect of translation of foreign currencies is not material. CONCENTRATION OF CREDIT RISK At December 31, 2000, the Company's cash equivalents were invested principally in money market accounts, a substantial portion of which are uninsured. CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS The Company considers all highly liquid investments with a maturity of three months or less when purchased to be cash equivalents. F-10 35 Amarillo Biosciences, Inc. and Subsidiaries (companies in the development stage) Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued) December 31, 2000 1. ORGANIZATION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED) INVENTORY The Company's inventory consists of IFN[alpha] lozenges available for sale. The Company's policy is to state inventory at the lower of cost determined on a lot basis or market. PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT Property and equipment are stated at cost. Depreciation is calculated using methods that approximate the declining balance method over the estimated useful lives of the assets. PATENTS; PATENT EXPENDITURES ABI holds patent license agreements and also holds patents which are owned by the Company. All patent license agreements remain in effect over the life of the underlying patents. Accordingly, the patent license fee is being amortized over 15-17 years using the straight-line method. Patent fees and legal fees associated with the issuance of new owned patents are capitalized and amortized over 15-17 years. INCOME TAXES The Company files a consolidated income tax return with its domestic subsidiaries, Amarillo Cell of Canada, Inc., Veldona Africa, Inc., Veldona Poland, Inc., Veldona USA, Inc., Vanguard Biosciences, Inc. and ABI Taiwan, Inc. On January 1, 1993, the Company changed its method of accounting for income taxes from the deferred method to the liability method required by Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes (SFAS 109). As permitted by the new rules, prior years' financial statements have not been restated. The effect of adopting SFAS 109 was not material. REVENUE RECOGNITION Contract revenue for research and development performed under the manufacturing and supply agreement with Hayashibara Biochemical Laboratories, Inc. (HBL) (see Note 4) was recorded as earned based on research and administrative costs incurred. Amounts received in advance of services to be performed were recorded as deferred revenue until expenses were incurred. The remaining balance of all contract revenue received from HBL was recorded as earned in 1996. F-11 36 Amarillo Biosciences, Inc. and Subsidiaries (companies in the development stage) Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued) December 31, 2000 1. ORGANIZATION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED) RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT Research and development costs are expensed as incurred. USE OF ESTIMATES The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. STOCK SPLIT In May 1993, the Company approved a ten-for-one stock split for all issued and outstanding shares. As described in Note 7, during 1996 a six-for-five stock split was effected. All references to common stock and per share data have been restated to give effect to these splits. STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION The Company accounts for stock-based compensation utilizing Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees (APB 25). In October 1996, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards Number 123, Accounting for Stock Based Compensation (SFAS 123). Under the provisions of SFAS 123, the Company has elected to continue to apply the provisions of APB 25 to its stock- based compensation arrangements and provide supplementary financial statement disclosures as required under SFAS 123. BASIC AND DILUTED NET LOSS PER SHARE Net loss per share is based on the number of weighted average shares outstanding. The effect of warrants and options outstanding (see Notes 7 and 8) is anti-dilutive. F-12 37 Amarillo Biosciences, Inc. and Subsidiaries (companies in the development stage) Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued) December 31, 2000 1. ORGANIZATION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED) COMPREHENSIVE INCOME As of January 1, 1998, the Company adopted Financial Accounting Standards Board Statement No. 130 (SFAS 130), Reporting Comprehensive Income. SFAS 130 establishes new rules for the display of comprehensive income and its components; however, the adoption of this Statement had no impact on the Company's results of operations or shareholders' equity. SFAS 130 requires unrealized gains or losses on the Company's available-for-sale securities, which prior to adoption were reported separately in shareholders' equity, to be included in other comprehensive income. Prior year financial statements have been reclassified to conform to the requirements of SFAS 130. 2. PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT Property and equipment are stated at cost and consist of the following:
DECEMBER 31, ------------------------------------- 2000 1999 ------------------------------------- Land $ 8,000 $ 8,000 Building 94,532 94,532 Furniture and equipment 134,287 134,287 Automobile 13,688 13,688 ------------------------------------- 250,507 250,507 Less accumulated depreciation 157,271 144,708 ------------------------------------- $ 93,236 $ 105,799 =====================================
3. NOTES PAYABLE In September 1991, the Company borrowed $1,000,000 under a note payable agreement with HBL. In September 1992, the Company borrowed an additional $1,000,000 under a similar note agreement with HBL. The $1,000,000 note plus accrued interest of $300,000 due September 25, 1996 was renewed in a new note to HBL for $1,300,000 due September 25, 2001, which accrued interest at the rate of 4 1/2%. The $1,000,000 note plus accrued interest of $300,000 due September 16, 1997 was renewed in a new note to HBL for $1,300,000 due September 16, 2002, which accrued interest at the rate of 4 1/2%. Each of the notes provided that the principal and accrued interest be paid only from 10% of the Company's gross revenues from sales of interferon. F-13 38 Amarillo Biosciences, Inc. and Subsidiaries (companies in the development stage) Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued) December 31, 2000 3. NOTES PAYABLE (CONTINUED) In April 1999, HBL agreed to convert $2,837,526 debt and accrued interest owed to it by the Company to voting common stock of the Company. The total number of shares issued to HBL in consideration for the cancellation of the indebtedness was 946,094 shares valued at the then market value of $2.99 per share. The Company also had a loan agreement with HBL, which called for HBL to loan the Company $3,000,000 to be advanced in three installments as follows: $1,000,000 by August 31, 1999; $1,000,000 by November 30, 1999; and $1,000,000 by February 29, 2000. The annual interest rate on unpaid principal from the date of each respective advance was 4 1/2%, with accrued interest being payable at the maturity of the note. The note was payable on or before July 22, 2004, or on or before the expiration of one (1) year after approval of the Company's product by the FDA, whichever occurs first. On September 30, 1999, the Company entered into an Agreement to Convert Debt with HBL regarding the above described note payable to HBL in the then principal amount of $1,000,000, the first loan installment having by then been advanced. On October 15, 1999, pursuant to the Agreement to Convert Debt, HBL canceled the then note balance in exchange for 1,111,831 shares of common stock of the Company valued at the then market value of $0.9044 per share. The two additional $1,000,000 advances were to be likewise converted to equity purchases on or before November 30, 1999 and February 29, 2000, respectively. However, by subsequent agreement of the parties, the equity purchases planned for November 30, 1999 and February 29, 2000 were reinstated as loans. The Company received a loan of $1,000,000 on November 30, 1999, evidenced by note dated December 3, 1999 in the original principal amount of $1,000,000 bearing interest at the rate of 4 1/2% per annum and due and payable on or before December 3, 2004, or on or before the expiration of one year after approval of the Company's product by the FDA, whichever occurs first. The final installment was advanced on February 29, 2000, under terms which are identical, except that the principal and accrued interest under that note will be payable on or before February 29, 2005, or on or before the expiration of one year after approval of the Company's product by the FDA, whichever occurs first. As a result of its related party nature, the Company has concluded it is not practicable to estimate the fair value of its note payable to stockholder. F-14 39 Amarillo Biosciences, Inc. and Subsidiaries (companies in the development stage) Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued) December 31, 2000 4. MANUFACTURING AND SUPPLY AGREEMENTS The Company was a party to the following manufacturing and supply agreements at December 31, 2000: On March 13, 1992, the Company entered into a Joint Development and Manufacturing/Supply Agreement with HBL (the Development Agreement), a major stockholder (see Note 7) under which HBL will formulate, manufacture, and supply HBL interferon for the Company or any sub- licensee. In exchange, HBL is entitled to receive a transfer fee, specified royalties and a portion of any payment received by the Company for sub-license of rights under this agreement. The agreement further provides that the Company sub-license to HBL the right to market HBL interferon for oral use in humans and in non-human, warm-blooded species in Japan, in exchange for the Company receiving a royalty fee based on net sales. On June 1, 1994, the Company entered into an additional agreement with HBL to make the Company HBL's exclusive agent for the development of HBL interferon for non-oral use in humans and in non-human, warm-blooded species in North America. In exchange, HBL is entitled to receive a transfer fee based on units of interferon supplied. On April 4, 2000, the Company amended its existing distribution agreement with HBL to expand the agreement to include inhalation administration of human interferon-gamma. Under the Development Agreement, HBL provided $9,000,000 in research funding to the Company. The agreement also provides that a royalty fee be paid to HBL. The initial term of the agreement was for seven years, has been extended through March 13, 2002, and will be renewed automatically for successive three-year terms. However, HBL can terminate the agreement at any time after March 13, 2002, upon ninety (90) days' advance written notice of the Company's net sales of interferon-containing products for oral use in warm-blooded species not having exceeded $100,000 during the preceding calendar year. On October 20, 1989, the Company entered into a manufacturing and supply agreement with Interferon Sciences, Inc. (ISI), then a 1% stockholder of the Company, under which ISI will manufacture and utilize ISI interferon to formulate and supply interferon-containing compositions to the Company for use in non-human species. Under the Agreement, ISI is entitled to receive certain transfer fees, manufacturing and supply fees, and a portion of any payments received by the Company related to the use of ISI interferon. The agreement will be in force for seven years after ISI's receipt of the first purchase order from the Company and thereafter as long as net sales of such products by the Company meet certain levels. As of December 31, 2000, the Company had not submitted a purchase order to ISI. F-15 40 Amarillo Biosciences, Inc. and Subsidiaries (companies in the development stage) Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued) December 31, 2000 4. MANUFACTURING AND SUPPLY AGREEMENTS (CONTINUED) On October 13, 2000, the Company entered into a supply agreement with HBL under which the Company gained an exclusive right to purchase and distribute anhydrous crystalline maltose for the treatment of dry mouth (xerostomia). This exclusive supply agreement is worldwide, except Japan. On December 11, 2000, the Company entered into a supply agreement with Natrol, Inc., whereby the Company will supply anhydrous crystalline maltose exclusively to Natrol to treat xerostomia in the USA and Canada. 5. LICENSE AND SUBLICENSE AGREEMENTS On April 4, 2000, the Company amended its existing distribution agreement with HBL to expand the agreement to include inhalation administration of human interferon-gamma. The Company holds patent rights for which the Company has paid certain license fees under three license agreements. Under these agreements, the Company will pay the licensor a portion of any sub-license fee received by the Company with respect to the manufacturing, use or sale of a licensed product, as well as a royalty fee based on the net selling price of licensed products, subject to a minimum annual royalty. The Company has also entered into various sub-license agreements under which the Company is entitled to receive royalties based on the net sales value of licensed products. 6. RESEARCH AGREEMENTS The Company contracts with third parties throughout the world to conduct research including studies and clinical trials. These agreements are generally less than one year in duration. At December 31, 2000, the Company had commitments to provide additional funding of approximately $251,627 under these agreements. 7. COMMON STOCK In May 1993, the stockholders of the Company approved an amendment to the Articles of Incorporation to increase the total number of authorized shares of common stock of the Company from 1,000,000 shares to 10,000,000 shares. The stockholders also approved a ten-for-one stock split for the currently issued and outstanding shares of the Company. Pursuant to shareholder approval obtained at the Company's 1999 annual meeting of shareholders, the Company amended its Articles of Incorporation effective June 22, 1999, to increase the number of voting common shares authorized for issuance from 10,000,000 F-16 41 Amarillo Biosciences, Inc. and Subsidiaries (companies in the development stage) Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued) December 31, 2000 7. COMMON STOCK (CONTINUED) to 20,000,000, and to establish a new class of preferred stock consisting of 10,000,000 authorized shares, issuable in series. To date, no preferred stock has been issued. Since 1984, the Company has issued common stock in exchange for various professional, research, and consulting services. The stock issued for non-cash consideration was assigned a value based on the fair value of the services received. In July 1992, the Board of Directors approved restricted stock grants to three employees which allowed the Company to issue, under certain conditions, up to 180,000 shares of its authorized but unissued shares of common stock. In May 1994, the Board of Directors approved restricted stock grants to an additional employee which allowed the Company to issue, under certain conditions, up to 30,000 shares of its authorized but unissued shares of common stock. In January 1995, 29,640 shares of common stock (net of required federal withholdings of 12,360 shares) were issued to a former employee under a Contract Termination and Severance Agreement. The issuance and withholding were in full satisfaction of the employee's original 84,000 shares in stock grants. In August 1996, 79,000 shares of common stock (net of required federal withholdings of 47,000 shares) were issued to the other three employees. The issuance and withholding were in full satisfaction of the three employees original 126,000 shares in stock grants. Total charges to compensation expense recognized by the Company cumulative from June 25, 1984 (inception) through December 31, 1998 was $735,000. In August 1996, the Company completed its initial public offering and issued 2,300,000 shares of common stock resulting in net proceeds of approximately $9,377,702. As described in Note 3, in April 1999, HBL agreed to convert $2,837,526 of debt and accrued interest owed to it by the Company to 946,094 shares of common stock of the Company. HBL subsequently entered into a $3,000,000 loan agreement with the Company, of which $1,005,486.50 in debt and accrued interest was converted to 1,111,831 shares of the Company's voting common stock effective October 15, 1999. In addition to 200,000 warrants granted to the Company's underwriter (exercisable through August 6, 2001 at $8.10 per share), the Company has 525,108 shares of common stock reserved for issuance upon exercise of warrants granted to outside consultants, 373,608 of which are not vested, and will vest only upon the occurrence of significant funding events in which the respective warrant holders are instrumental. F-17 42 Amarillo Biosciences, Inc. and Subsidiaries (companies in the development stage) Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued) December 31, 2000 7. COMMON STOCK (CONTINUED) During 1997, the Company granted 30,000 options to outside professionals for services which vested immediately at an exercise price of $4.25 (fair market value of the common stock at the date of the grant). The Company recognized $79,500 (representing the fair value of the options) in expense relating to these grants. During 1999, the Company granted 407,252 options to employees in lieu of cash compensation to be paid in fiscal 2000. The Company recorded compensation expense of $221,431 and a credit to additional paid in capital for 334,312 options, net of forfeitures, which vested in 2000. During 2000, the Company raised $790,000 from investors pursuant to a private placement of 316,000 shares of its common stock and 126,400 warrants to purchase that number of shares of the Company's common stock from time to time through April 11, 2005 at $3.125 per share for 63,200 shares and $3.75 per share for 63,200 shares. Accordingly, the Company has reserved an additional 126,400 shares of its common stock to satisfy the possible future exercise of such warrants. 8. STOCK OPTION PLAN The Company has elected to follow APB 25 and related interpretations in accounting for its stock- based compensation. Under APB 25, because the exercise price of the Company's stock options has been equal to or greater than the market price of the underlying stock on the date of grant, no compensation expense has been recognized. During 1996, the Company introduced two stock option plans: the 1996 Employee Stock Option Plan (Employee Plan) and the Outside Director and Advisor Stock Option Plan (Director Plan). The Employee Plan has authorized the grant of options to employees for up to 590,000 shares of the Company's common stock. All options granted have five to ten year terms and become exercisable over a four to five year period. The option price is equal to 100% to 110% of the fair value of the common stock on the date of grant depending on the percentage of common stock owned by the optionee on the grant date. The Director Plan allows options to purchase a maximum of 410,000 shares of the Company's common stock to be granted to outside directors and scientific advisors to the Company at an exercise price equivalent to 100% of the fair market value of the common stock on the date of grant. These are ten-year options and become exercisable over a period of five years. In addition to options issued pursuant to the Company's Employee and Director stock option plans, the Company recently granted 625,932 non-qualified options to Directors, employees, and one consultant. Two Hundred Thousand (200,000) options were granted to Directors on December 16, 1999. Such options vested immediately, and have an exercise price of $1.625 per F-18 43 Amarillo Biosciences, Inc. and Subsidiaries (companies in the development stage) Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued) December 31, 2000 8. STOCK OPTION PLAN (CONTINUED) share which was the fair market value of the Company's stock as of the date of grant. Twenty Thousand (20,000) options were granted on the same date and upon the same terms to a non- affiliated consultant of the Company. Four Hundred Five Thousand Nine Hundred Thirty-Two (405,932) options were granted to employees of the Company, including 300,000 granted to Joseph Cummins, President and CEO. Such options are exercisable at a price of $.875 per share, being the fair market value of the Company's stock on December 29, 1999, the date of grant. All of such options granted to employees were granted in consideration of the employees' agreement to relinquish salary during 2000, on the basis of two options granted for every $1.00 of salary voluntarily relinquished, with the amount of such relinquished salary being reflected in the Option Agreement signed with each employee, such options to vest monthly over twelve (12) months beginning in January 2000, and to expire December 29, 2004. The 300,000 options granted to Joseph Cummins were subsequently reduced to 250,000 options by agreement of the parties. Supplemental information regarding net loss and net loss per share is required by SFAS 123 and has been determined as if the Company had accounted for its stock options under the fair value method of that Statement. The fair value for these options was estimated at the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following weighted average assumptions for 2000 and 1999, respectively: risk-free interest rate of 5.99% and 5.69%; dividend yield of 0% and 0%; volatility factors of the expected market price of the Company's common stock of 1.408 and 1.306; and a weighted-average expected life of the option of 5.4 and 3.1 years. The Black-Scholes option valuation model was developed for use in estimating the fair value of traded options which have no vesting restrictions and are fully transferable. In addition, option valuation models require the input of highly subjective assumptions including the expected stock price volatility. Because the Company's stock options have characteristics significantly different from those of traded options, and because changes in the subjective input assumptions can materially affect the fair value estimate, in management's opinion, the existing models do not necessarily provide a reliable single measure of the fair value of its stock options. For purposes of pro forma disclosures, the estimated fair value of the options is amortized to expense over the options' vesting period. The expense amounts for 2000 and 1999 are not necessarily indicative of the effects on reported net income (loss) for future years. The Company's pro forma information as of December 31, is as follows: F-19 44 Amarillo Biosciences, Inc. and Subsidiaries (companies in the development stage) Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued) December 31, 2000 8. STOCK OPTION PLAN (CONTINUED)
2000 1999 ----------------------------------------- Pro forma net loss $ (3,840,572) $ (6,549,923) Pro forma basic and diluted net loss per share $ (0.49) $ (1.03)
Based on the Black-Scholes method, the fair value of the options granted during the year ended December 31, is as follows:
2000 1999 -------------------- --------------------- Number of options issued at fair market value of stock 32,000 854,307 Weighted-average fair value of options $1.35 $0.90 Weighted-average exercise price of options $1.48 $1.18
A summary of the Company's stock option activity, and related information for the year ended December 31, is as follows:
2000 1999 ---------------------------- --------------------------- WEIGHTED WEIGHTED AVERAGE AVERAGE EXERCISE EXERCISE OPTIONS PRICE OPTIONS PRICE ---------------------------- --------------------------- Outstanding, beginning of year 1,176,807 $1.88 322,500 $3.74 Granted 32,000 1.48 854,307 1.18 Canceled (106,795) 1.35 - - Exercised (19,200) 0.88 - - ------------- -------------- Outstanding, end of year 1,082,812 $1.94 1,176,807 $1.88 ============= ============== Exercisable at end of year 861,175 $1.91 384,661 $2.67 ============= ==============
Exercise prices for options outstanding as of December 31, 2000 ranged from $0.875 to $5.50. Of these options, 221,500 have exercise prices ranging from $3.875 to $5.50 and the remainder range from $0.875 to $3.375. The weighted-average remaining contractual life of those options is 5.63 years. F-20 45 Amarillo Biosciences, Inc. and Subsidiaries (companies in the development stage) Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued) December 31, 2000 9. EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLAN The Company has a Simplified Employee Pension Plan (the Plan), which is a contributory plan that covers all employees of the Company. Contributions to the Plan are at the discretion of the Company. The plan expense for the years ended December 31, 2000 and 1999, and cumulative from June 25, 1984 (inception) through December 31, 2000 was $0, $0 and $200,857, respectively. 10. INCOME TAXES Deferred income taxes reflect the net tax effects of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for income tax reporting purposes. The Company's deferred tax asset of approximately $6,900,000 and $5,825,000 at December 31, 2000 and 1999, respectively, was subject to a valuation allowance of $6,900,000 and $5,825,000 at December 31, 2000 and 1999, respectively, because of uncertainty regarding the Company's ability to realize future tax benefits associated with the deferred tax assets. Deferred tax assets were comprised primarily of net operating loss carryovers and the cash method of accounting used by the Company for federal income tax reporting. At December 31, 2000, the Company has net operating loss carryforwards of approximately $17,900,000 for federal income tax purposes expiring in 2006 through 2020. The ability of the Company to utilize these carryforwards may be limited should changes in stockholder ownership occur. At December 31, 2000, the Company had approximately $14,000 of alternative minimum tax credits which may be carried forward indefinitely. The difference between the reported income tax provision and the benefit normally expected by applying the statutory rate to the loss before income taxes results primarily from the inability of the Company to recognize its tax losses. 11. CONTINGENCIES The Company is not a party to any litigation and is not aware of any pending litigation or unasserted claims or assessments as of December 31, 2000. F-21 46 Amarillo Biosciences, Inc. and Subsidiaries (companies in the development stage) Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued) December 31, 2000 12. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS In the ordinary course of business, the Company has and expects to have transactions with related parties, including stockholders. In addition to the transactions disclosed elsewhere in these financial statements, during 2000 the Company has used the law firm of Sprouse, Smith & Rowley, P.C. Mr. Edward Morris, Secretary of the Company, is a partner with Sprouse, Smith & Rowley. The Company was invoiced $110,320 during 2000 for legal services rendered by Sprouse, Smith & Rowley. On March 25, 1999, ABI signed a contract with PPD Pharmaco, Inc., now known as PPD Development, Inc. to provide clinical monitoring and data entry services for ABI's Phase III clinical trials in Sjogren's syndrome. During the year ended December 31, 2000, the Company paid $816,552, for clinical research organization services to PPD Development, Inc. At the time that the contract was signed, Mr. Tom D'Alonzo was President and Chief Operating Officer of PPD and its Clinical Research Organization subsidiary, PPD Development, Inc. Mr. D'Alonzo is also a member of the Board of Directors of ABI. Mr. D'Alonzo retired from PPD Development, Inc. in October 1999, but remains a member of the Board of Directors of ABI. F-22 47 EXHIBIT INDEX
NUMBER DESCRIPTION ---------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 3.1+ Restated Articles of Incorporation of the Company, dated June 22, 1999. 3.3* Bylaws of the Company. 4.1* Specimen Common Stock Certificate. 4.2* Form of Underwriter's Warrant. 10.1* Agreement dated as of April 1, 1984 between University Patents, Inc. and the Company. 10.2* License Agreement dated as of March 22, 1988 between the Company and The Texas A&M University System. 10.3* License Agreement dated October 20, 1989 between the Company and ISI. 10.4* Manufacturing and Supply Agreement dated October 20, 1989 between the Company and ISI. 10.5* Joint Development and Manufacturing/Supply Agreement dated March 13, 1992 between the Company and HBL, as amended. 10.7* Japan Animal Health License Agreement dated January 20, 1993 between the Company and HBL. 10.9* Employment Agreement dated as of March 4, 1994 between the Company and Dr. Joseph M. Cummins, as amended. 10.11* Manufacturing/Supply Agreement dated June 1, 1994 between the Company and HBL. 10.12* Settlement Agreement dated April 27, 1995 among the Company, ISI, Pharma Pacific Management Pty. Ltd. ("PPM"), Pharma Pacific Pty. Ltd., Pharma Pacific Ltd., and Fernz Corporation Limited. 10.13* Amendment of ACC/ISI License Agreement dated April 27, 1995 between the Company and ISI. 10.14* PPM/ACC Sub-license Agreement dated April 27, 1995 between PPM and the Company. 10.18* Form of Consulting Agreement between the Company and the Underwriter. 10.20+ 1996 Employee Stock Option Plan, Amended and Restated as of May 11, 1999. 10.21+ Outside Director and Advisor Stock Option Plan, Amended and Restated as of May 11, 1999. 10.22* Form of Indemnification Agreement between the Company and officers and directors of the Company. 10.23* Indemnification Agreement between HBL and the Company. 10.26** License Agreement dated July 22, 1997, between Hoffmann-La Roche Inc., and the Company. 10.27** Distribution Agreement dated January 12, 1998, between Global Damon Pharmaceutical and the Company.
20 48
NUMBER DESCRIPTION ---------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 10.28** Distribution Agreement dated September 17, 1997, between HBL and the Company (TNF-A). 10.29** Distribution Agreement dated September 17, 1997, between HBL and the Company (IFN-G). 10.30*** Amendment No. 1 dated September 28, 1998 to License Agreement of March 22, 1988, between The Texas A&M University System and the Company. 10.36 License Agreement dated February 1, 2000 between Molecular Medicine Research Institute, and the Company (IFN-G administered orally). 10.37(a) License and Supply Agreement dated April 3, 2000 with Key Oncologics (Pty) Ltd., and the Company. 10.38 Amendment No. 1 dated April 4, 2000, to Interferon-G Distribution Agreement dated September 17, 1997 between HBL and the Company (IFN-G). 10.39(a) License and Supply Agreement dated April 25, 2000 between Biopharm for Scientific Research and Drug Industry Development and the Company. 10.40(a) Sales Agreement dated May 5, 2000, between Wilke Resources, Inc. and the Company. 10.41 Engagement Agreement dated September 26, 2000, between Hunter Wise Financial Group, LLC, and the Company. 10.42(a) Supply Agreement (Anhydrous Crystalline Maltose) dated October 13, 2000, between Hayashibara Biochemical Laboratories, Inc., and the Company. 10.43(a) Supply Agreement dated December 11, 2000, between Natrol, Inc., and the Company. 21. Subsidiaries of the Company. The following sets forth the name and jurisdiction of incorporation of each subsidiary of the Company. All of such subsidiaries are wholly- owned by the Company. NAME JURISDICTION OF INCORPORATION ---------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------- VANGUARD BIOSCIENCES, INC. TEXAS VELDONA USA, INC. TEXAS VELDONA AFRICA, INC. TEXAS VELDONA POLAND, INC. TEXAS ABI TAIWAN, INC. TEXAS AMARILLO CELL OF CANADA, INC. TEXAS 23.1 Consent of Ernst & Young LLP.
*The Exhibit is incorporated by reference to the exhibit of the same number to the Company's Registration Statement on Form SB-2 filed with and declared effective by the Commission (File No. 333-4413) on August 8, 1996. **The Exhibit is incorporated by reference to the Company's 1997 Annual Report on Form 10-KSB filed with the Commission on or before March 31, 1998. ***The Exhibit is incorporated by reference to the Company's 1998 Annual Report on Form 10-KSB filed with the Commission on or before March 31, 1999. +The Exhibit is incorporated by reference to the Company's Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarterly period ended June 30, 1999, filed with the Commission on August 12, 1999, and subsequently amended on September 13, 1999. (a)Portions of this exhibit have been omitted and filed separately with the commission. 21