Exhibit 13

PART I.          FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1.          FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

MERISTAR HOSPITALITY OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Dollars and units in thousands)

	June 30,
	2003			December 31,
	(Unaudited)			2002
ASSETS
Investments in hotel properties	$	2,653,959		$	3,020,909
Accumulated depreciation		(407,965	)		(460,972	)
		2,245,994			2,559,937
Restricted cash		30,105			20,365
Investments in and advances to affiliates		41,714			41,714
Note receivable from Interstate Hotels & Resorts		—			42,052
Prepaid expenses and other assets		32,222			39,197
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $980 and $848		68,996			56,828
Marketable securities (Note 2)		18,056			—
Cash and cash equivalents (Note 2)		56,300			33,889
	$	2,493,387		$	2,793,982
LIABILITIES AND PARTNERS’ CAPITAL
Long-term debt	$	1,292,788		$	1,296,597
Notes payable to MeriStar Hospitality Corporation		357,699			357,505
Accounts payable and accrued expenses		99,231			104,677
Accrued interest		52,121			52,907
Due to Interstate Hotels & Resorts		5,925			10,500
Other liabilities		13,637			15,967
Total liabilities		1,821,401			1,838,153
Minority interests		2,565			2,624
Redeemable OP units at redemption value, 3,267 and 4,195 outstanding		28,851			38,205
Partners’ capital – Common OP Units, 46,110 and 45,231 issued and outstanding		640,570			915,000
	$	2,493,387		$	2,793,982

See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.

3

MERISTAR HOSPITALITY OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
UNAUDITED
(Dollars in thousands, except per unit amounts)

			Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended
			June 30,						June 30,
			2003			2002			2003			2002
Revenue:
	Hotel operations:
		Rooms	$	164,393		$	174,945		$	319,610		$	336,830
		Food and beverage		68,496			69,817			130,196			129,673
		Other hotel operations		21,693			20,614			40,402			39,298
	Office rental, parking and other revenue			3,461			4,240			6,756			8,501
Total revenue				258,043			269,616			496,964			514,302
Hotel operating expenses:
		Rooms		40,036			41,199			77,902			78,085
		Food and beverage		47,803			48,752			93,042			91,515
		Other hotel operating expenses		12,787			11,382			23,835			21,827
Office rental, parking and other expenses				583			684			1,213			1,497
Other operating expenses:
		General and administrative		42,612			42,717			84,301			84,161
		Property operating costs		37,893			39,085			74,116			73,999
		Depreciation and amortization		29,553			29,681			57,985			60,323
		Loss on asset impairments		207,630			—			262,608			—
		Property taxes, insurance and other		20,454			16,179			40,509			35,546
		Change in fair value of non-hedging derivatives, net of swap payments		—			3,090			—			3,079
		Loss on fair value of non-hedging derivatives		—			—			—			4,735
Operating expenses				439,351			232,769			715,511			454,767
Operating (loss) income				(181,308	)		36,847			(218,547	)		59,535
Interest expense, net				34,739			34,112			69,565			68,767
(Loss) income before minority interests, income taxes, and discontinued operations				(216,047	)		2,735			(288,112	)		(9,232	)
Minority interests				5			3			(6	)		(8	)
Income tax (expense) benefit				(21	)		(69	)		127			214
(Loss) income from continuing operations				(216,063	)		2,669			(287,991	)		(9,026	)
Discontinued operations:
	(Loss) income from discontinued operations before tax benefit (expense)			(598	)		855			(1,864	)		2,260
	Income tax benefit (expense)			2			(21	)		(2	)		(55	)
(Loss) income from discontinued operations				(596	)		834			(1,866	)		2,205
Net (loss) income			$	(216,659	)	$	3,503		$	(289,857	)	$	(6,821	)
Preferred distributions				(141	)		(141	)		(282	)		(282	)
Net (loss) income applicable to common unitholders			$	(216,800	)	$	3,362		$	(290,139	)	$	(7,103	)
Net (loss) income applicable to general partner unitholders			$	(203,867	)	$	3,095		$	(271,172	)	$	(6,525	)
Net (loss) income applicable to limited partner unitholders			$	(12,933	)	$	267		$	(18,967	)	$	(578	)
Earnings per unit:
	Basic:
		(Loss) income from continuing operations	$	(4.41	)	$	0.05		$	(5.88	)	$	(0.19	)
		(Loss) income from discontinued operations		(0.01	)		0.02			(0.04	)		0.04
	Net (loss) income per basic unit		$	(4.42	)	$	0.07		$	(5.92	)	$	(0.15	)
	Diluted:
		(Loss) income from continuing operations	$	(4.41	)	$	0.05		$	(5.88	)	$	(0.19	)
		(Loss) income from discontinued operations		(0.01	)		0.02			(0.04	)		0.04
	Net (loss) income per diluted unit		$	(4.42	)	$	0.07		$	(5.92	)	$	(0.15	)

See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.

4

MERISTAR HOSPITALITY OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
UNAUDITED
(Dollars in thousands)

				Six Months Ended
				June 30,
				2003			2002
Operating activities:
	Net loss			$	(289,857	)	$	(6,821	)
	Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by operating activities:
		Depreciation and amortization			58,478			63,260
		Loss on asset impairments			264,677			—
		Loss on fair value of non-hedging derivatives			—			4,735
		Minority interests			6			8
		Amortization of unearned stock-based compensation			1,433			1,920
		Unrealized gain on interest rate swaps recognized in net loss			(3,395	)		(2,905	)
		Deferred income taxes			(1,534	)		(332	)
		Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
			Accounts receivable		(12,168	)		(4,817	)
			Prepaid expenses and other assets		4,225			3,098
			Due from/to Interstate Hotels & Resorts		(4,575	)		4,900
			Accounts payable, accrued expenses, accrued interest and other liabilities		(5,480	)		3,884
Net cash provided by operating activities					11,810			66,930
Investing activities:
	Investments in hotel properties				(14,547	)		(24,696	)
	Proceeds from sales of assets				15,720			—
	Purchases of marketable securities				(18,056	)		—
	Net payments from (advances to) Interstate Hotels & Resorts				42,052			(10,000	)
	(Increase) decrease in restricted cash				(9,740	)		4,384
	Other, net				(299	)		—
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities					15,130			(30,312	)
Financing activities:
	Principal payments on long-term debt				(4,208	)		(265,840	)
	Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt				—			234,841
	Deferred financing fees				—			(3,571	)
	Contributions from partners				—			3,156
	Distributions paid to partners				(141	)		(1,212	)
	Purchase of limited partnership unit				(65	)		—
Net cash used in financing activities					(4,414	)		(32,626	)
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents					(115	)		(28	)
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents					22,411			3,964
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period					33,889			23,441
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period				$	56,300		$	27,405
Supplemental Cash Flow Information
Cash paid for interest and income taxes:
	Interest, net of capitalized interest			$	70,399		$	60,454
	Income taxes			$	1,902		$	602

See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.

5

MERISTAR HOSPITALITY OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
JUNE 30, 2003

1.          Organization

      MeriStar Hospitality Operating Partnership, L.P. is the subsidiary operating partnership of MeriStar Hospitality Corporation (“MeriStar Hospitality,” which is a real estate investment trust, or REIT). We own a portfolio of upscale, full-service hotels and resorts in the United States and Canada. Our portfolio is diversified geographically as well as by franchise and brand affiliations. As of June 30, 2003, we owned 105 hotels, with 27,269 rooms, all of which were leased by our taxable subsidiaries and managed by Interstate Hotels & Resorts, Inc. (“Interstate Hotels”). In July 2003, we sold two hotels with 422 rooms.

      Our taxable subsidiaries are parties to management agreements with a subsidiary of Interstate Hotels to manage all of our hotels. Under these management agreements, the taxable subsidiaries pay a management fee to a subsidiary of Interstate Hotels for each property. The taxable subsidiaries in turn make rental payments to us under the participating leases. Under the management agreements, the base management fee is 2.5% of total hotel revenue, plus incentive payments based on meeting performance thresholds that could total up to an additional 1.5% of total hotel revenue. All of the agreements expire in 2010 and have three renewal periods of five years each at the option of Interstate Hotels, subject to some exceptions.

2.          Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

      Interim Financial Statements. We have prepared these unaudited interim financial statements according to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. We have omitted certain information and footnote disclosures that are normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. These interim financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements, accompanying notes and other information included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002. Certain 2002 amounts have been reclassified to conform to the 2003 presentation.

      In our opinion, the accompanying unaudited consolidated interim financial statements reflect all adjustments, which are of a normal and recurring nature, necessary for a fair presentation of the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows for the periods presented. The results of operations for the interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the results for the entire year.

      Principles of Consolidation. In January 2003, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Interpretation No. (FIN) 46, “Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities,” an interpretation of Accounting Research Bulletin No. 51, “Consolidated Financial Statements.” The interpretation addresses how to identify variable interest entities and when to consolidate those entities. Consolidation of variable interest entities is required by the primary beneficiary. The interpretation applied immediately to variable interest entities created after January 31, 2003, and applies beginning July 1, 2003 to those variable interest entities that were acquired before February 1, 2003. The initial application of the interpretation did not affect our results of operations or financial condition as we have not obtained an interest in any qualifying entity on or after January 31, 2003. We do not expect the application of the second phase to have a material affect on our results of operations or financial condition.

      Held for Sale Properties. We classify the properties we are actively marketing as held for sale once all of the following conditions are met:

•  Our board has approved the sale,

•  We have a fully executed agreement with a qualified buyer which provides for no significant outstanding or continuing obligations with the property after sale, and

•  We have a significant non-refundable deposit.

6

      We carry properties held for sale at the lower of their carrying values or estimated fair values less costs to sell. We cease depreciation at the time the asset is classified as held for sale. If material to our total portfolio, we segregate the held for sale properties on our consolidated balance sheet.

      Cash and Cash Equivalents. Our cash equivalents consist of investments in debt securities, including commercial paper, overnight repurchase agreements and money market funds, with an original maturity of three months or less. We classify investments in these types of securities with original maturities greater than three months as marketable securities.

      Marketable Securities. Our marketable securities consist of investments in debt securities, including commercial paper and agency discount notes, with maturities less than six months from their date of purchase. As of June 30, 2003, the majority of the securities mature within 90 days. We record these securities at amortized cost. As of June 30, 2003, the fair value of these securities was $18.1 million.

      Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets. We adopted the provisions of SFAS No. 144, “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets,” on January 1, 2002. SFAS No. 144 requires the current and prior period operating results of any asset that has been classified as held for sale or has been disposed of on or after January 1, 2002 and where we have no continuing involvement, including any gain or loss recognized, to be recorded as discontinued operations.

      The provisions of SFAS No. 144 also require that whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of a long-lived asset may be impaired that an analysis be performed to determine the recoverability of the asset’s carrying value. We make estimates of the undiscounted cash flows from the expected future operations or potential sale of the asset. If the analysis indicates that the carrying value is not recoverable from these estimates of cash flows, we write down the asset to estimated fair value and recognize an impairment loss. Any impairment losses we recognize on assets held for use are recorded as operating expenses. We record any impairment losses on assets held for sale as a component of discontinued operations.

      We adopted the provisions of SFAS No. 146, “Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities,” on January 1, 2003. SFAS No. 146 requires that a liability for a cost associated with an exit or disposal activity be recognized and measured initially at fair value only when the liability is incurred. Our strategy includes the disposition of certain hotel assets, all of which are managed under agreements that typically include termination penalty clauses with Interstate Hotels. As a result, we may incur termination obligations related to our asset dispositions. Any such liability will be recognized at the time the asset disposition is complete and a termination notice is provided to Interstate Hotels. At that time, the recognition of the termination obligation will be included in the calculation of the final gain or loss on sale and will be included in discontinued operations. For further discussion of potential termination obligations, see “Asset Dispositions” included in Item 2 of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

      Gains and Losses From Extinguishments of Debt. We adopted the provisions of SFAS No. 145, “Rescission of FASB Statements No. 4, No. 44 and No. 64, Amendment of SFAS No. 13, and Technical Corrections,” on January 1, 2003. The rescission of SFAS No. 4 and No. 64 requires that all gains and losses from extinguishments of debt be classified as extraordinary only if the gains and losses are from unusual or infrequent transactions. It also requires prior period gains or losses that are not from unusual or infrequent transactions to be reclassified as an operating expense. The adoption of the standard did not have a significant affect on our results of operation or financial condition.

      Stock-Based Compensation. We adopted the recognition provisions of SFAS No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation,” as amended in December 2002 by SFAS No. 148, on January 1, 2003 for new stock options issued under our compensation programs. As permitted by SFAS No. 148, we elected to apply the provisions prospectively, which includes recognizing compensation expense for only those stock options issued in 2003 and after. During the six months ended June 30, 2003, we granted 172,500 stock options to employees which vest ratably over three years. Compensation costs related to these stock options were not material to our results of operations for the six months ended June 30, 2003. We apply the provisions of Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees,” in accounting for our stock options issued under our compensation programs prior to January 1, 2003. As we granted these stock

7

options at market value, no compensation cost has been recognized. For our other equity-based compensation plans, we recognize compensation expense over the vesting period based on the fair market value of the award at the date of grant.

      Had compensation cost been determined based on fair value at the grant date for awards granted prior to our adoption of the fair value method prescribed in SFAS No. 123, as amended by SFAS No. 148, our net loss and per unit amounts would have been adjusted to the pro forma amounts indicated as follows (dollars in thousands, except per unit amounts):

		Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended
		June 30,						June 30,
		2003			2002			2003			2002
Net (loss) income, as reported		$	(216,659	)	$	3,503		$	(289,857	)	$	(6,821	)
	Add: Stock-based employee compensation expense included in reported net (loss) income, net of related tax effect		677			1,206			1,606			2,252
	Deduct: Total stock-based employee compensation expense determined under fair value-based method for all awards, net of related tax effect		(816	)		(1,411	)		(1,900	)		(2,704	)
Net (loss) income, pro forma		$	(216,798	)	$	3,298		$	(290,151	)	$	(7,273	)
Earnings per unit
	Basic, as reported	$	(4.42	)	$	0.07		$	(5.92	)	$	(0.15	)
	Basic, pro forma	$	(4.42	)	$	0.07		$	(5.93	)	$	(0.15	)
	Diluted, as reported	$	(4.42	)	$	0.07		$	(5.92	)	$	(0.15	)
	Diluted, pro forma	$	(4.42	)	$	0.07		$	(5.93	)	$	(0.15	)

      The effects of applying SFAS No. 123 for disclosing pro forma compensation costs may not be representative of the actual effects on reported net income and earnings per share in future periods.

      Accounting for Guarantees. We adopted FASB FIN 45, “Guarantor’s Accounting and Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees, Including Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness of Others,” an interpretation of FASB Statements No. 5, 57, and 107 and rescission of FASB Interpretation No. 34, on January 1, 2003. The interpretation requires recognition of liabilities at their fair value for newly-issued guarantees. We have no guarantees which require accounting under the provisions of this interpretation.

      New Accounting Pronouncements. The FASB issued FASB No. 149 “Amendment of Statement 133 on Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities” in April 2003. The statement clarifies under what circumstances a contract with an initial net investment meets the characteristics of a derivative, clarifies when a derivative contains a financing component, amends the definition of an underlying derivative, and amends certain other pronouncements. The statement applies to any freestanding financial derivative instruments entered into or modified after June 30, 2003. We do not expect adoption of this standard to have a material effect on our results of operations or financial condition, but we will assess its impact if and when we enter into any new derivative instruments that fall within the scope of this standard.

      The FASB issued FASB No. 150 “Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Characteristics of both Liabilities and Equity” in May 2003. The statement establishes standards for how to classify and measure certain financial instruments with characteristics of both liabilities and equity. It requires many instruments which were previously classified as equity to now be classified as a liability (or an asset in some circumstances), including: mandatorily redeemable instruments, instruments with repurchase obligations and instruments with obligations to issue a variable number of shares. The statement applies immediately to any freestanding financial instruments entered into or modified after May 31, 2003, and applies to all other

8

instruments on July 1, 2003. We have no financial instruments which are covered by the provisions of this standard.

3.          Comprehensive (Loss) Income

      Comprehensive loss was $212.8 million and comprehensive income was $3.8 million for the three months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002, respectively. Comprehensive (loss) income consisted of net loss of $216.7 million and net income of $3.5 million for the three months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002, respectively, and foreign currency translation adjustments.

      Comprehensive loss was $284.9 million and $5.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002, respectively. Comprehensive loss consisted of net loss of $289.9 million and $6.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002, respectively, foreign currency translation adjustments, and in 2002 a $0.5 million fair value gain adjustment for derivatives.

4.          Investments in Hotel Properties

      Investments in hotel properties consisted of the following (dollars in thousands):

	June 30,		December 31,
	2003		2002
Land	$	260,613	$	288,611
Buildings and improvements		2,063,912		2,351,769
Furniture, fixtures and equipment		286,405		344,541
Construction-in-progress		43,029		35,988
	$	2,653,959	$	3,020,909

      For the six months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002, we capitalized interest of $1.6 million and $1.9 million, respectively.

      In late 2002, due to changes in economic conditions and the decision to market non-core assets as part of our program to dispose of assets that do not fit our long-term strategy, we performed an analysis to determine the recoverability of each of our hotel properties. Assets we have identified as “non-core” typically have one or more of the following characteristics: limited future growth potential, secondary market locations, secondary brand affiliations, higher than average future capital expenditure requirements, or an over-weighted market location.

      We recognized an impairment loss in 2002 on certain non-core assets we were then actively marketing. Late in the first quarter of 2003, we expanded our asset disposition program to include a total of 16 non-core assets and recognized an impairment loss of $56.7 million as a result of the change in our expected holding period for these assets.

      During the second quarter of 2003, we made the determination to dispose of an additional 19 non-core assets, for a total of 35 non-core assets included in our disposition program. Also during the second quarter, due to the market interest in certain of our other hotel assets, we decided to add an additional six assets to our disposition program. Due to this change in our expected holding period for these assets, we recognized an additional impairment loss of $208 million related to the disposition of these 41 assets during the three months ended June 30, 2003. We sold one of these hotels in April 2003 and two more hotels in July 2003.

      The impairment charges are based on our estimates of the fair value of the disposition properties. These estimates require us to make assumptions about the sales prices that we expect to realize for each property as well as the timing of a potential sale. In making these estimates, we consider the operating results of the assets, the market for comparable properties, and quotes from brokers, among other information. Actual results could differ materially from these estimates.

9

      As of June 30, 2003, our net investments in hotel properties included $16 million for two assets (both sold in July 2003), which met our criteria for held-for-sale classification. The remaining hotels included in our asset disposition program do not meet the probability criterion as prescribed by SFAS No. 144 to classify as held-for-sale.

5. Investments in and Advances to Affiliates

      In 1999, we invested $40 million in MeriStar Investment Partners, L.P. (“MIP”), a joint venture established to acquire upscale, full-service hotels. Our cost-basis investment is in the form of a partnership interest, in which we earn a 16% cumulative preferred return. We recognize the return quarterly as it becomes due to us. As of June 30, 2003, cumulative preferred returns of $15 million were due from MIP and included in accounts receivable on the accompanying consolidated balance sheet. We expect that any cumulative unpaid preferred returns would be paid in the future from excess cash flow above our current return and from potential disposition proceeds in excess of debt allocated to individual assets. Given the current economic environment, we do not expect MIP’s operations to provide adequate cash flow in the near term for significant payment of our current returns or repayments of our cumulative unpaid preferred returns. We evaluate the collectibility of our preferred return based on our preference to distributions and the underlying value of the hotel properties. Should the cash flow from MIP’s operations or the underlying value of the hotel properties continue to weaken over an extended period of time, the value of our original investment may also decline.

6. Long-Term Debt and Notes Payable to MeriStar Hospitality

      Long-term debt consisted of the following (dollars in thousands):

		June 30,			December 31,
		2003			2002
Senior unsecured notes		$	950,000		$	950,000
Secured facility			311,886			314,626
Mortgage and other debt			36,562			38,030
Unamortized issue discount			(5,660	)		(6,059	)
	Long-term debt	$	1,292,788		$	1,296,597
Notes payable to MeriStar Hospitality		$	359,300		$	359,300
Unamortized issue discount			(1,601	)		(1,795	)
	Notes payable	$	357,699		$	357,505
Total long-term debt and notes payable to MeriStar Hospitality		$	1,650,487		$	1,654,102

      Aggregate future maturities as of June 30, 2003 were as follows (dollars in thousands):

2003 (six months)	$	3,956
2004		170,720
2005		8,670
2006		9,412
2007		213,616
Thereafter		1,244,113
	$	1,650,487

      As of June 30, 2003, all of our debt bore fixed rates of interest. Our overall weighted average interest rate was 8.59%. The fair value, based on market prices at the end of the period, of our fixed-rate, long-term debt was $1.62 billion at June 30, 2003.

10

      Senior unsecured notes. The notes are unsecured obligations of certain subsidiaries of ours, and MeriStar Hospitality guarantees payment of principal and interest on the notes. These notes contain various restrictive incurrence covenants, limiting our ability to initiate or transact certain business activities if specific financial thresholds are not achieved. One of those thresholds is maintaining a 2 to 1 fixed charge coverage ratio (as defined in the indentures, fixed charges only include interest on debt obligations and preferred equity). As of June 30, 2003, our fixed charge coverage ratio was below 2 to 1, and therefore we were not permitted to enter into certain transactions, including the repurchase of our stock, the issuance of any preferred stock, the payment of dividends, the incurrence of any additional debt, or the repayment of outstanding debt before it comes due.

      There are certain exceptions, however, with respect to the incurrence of additional debt and early repayment of debt features in the indentures. We currently have the ability to incur $300 million of secured financing within restricted subsidiaries. We also have a general carve-out to incur $50 million of unspecified borrowings within a restricted subsidiary. Additionally, we are permitted to repay subordinated debt prior to its maturity from the proceeds of a pari passu or junior financing with a longer term than the debt refinanced, an equity offering, or a financing within an unrestricted subsidiary. We are permitted to invest five percent of consolidated net tangible assets (as defined in the indentures) in an unrestricted subsidiary. We would then be able to mortgage the properties contributed to the unrestricted subsidiary. See “Financial Condition, Liquidity, and Capital Resources” in Item 2 of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for our expectations in this regard.

      Secured facility. We completed a $330 million, 10-year, non-recourse financing secured by a portfolio of 19 hotels in 1999. The loan bears a fixed interest rate of 8.01% and matures in 2009. The secured facility contains standard provisions that require the servicer to maintain in escrow cash balances for certain items such as property taxes and insurance. In addition, the facility contains a provision that requires our mortgage servicer to retain in escrow the excess cash from the encumbered hotels after payment of debt service (“Excess Cash”), if net hotel operating income (“NOI”) for the trailing twelve months declines below $57 million. This provision was triggered in October 2002 and will be effective until the hotels generate the minimum cash flow required for two consecutive quarters, at which time the cash being held in escrow will be released to us. Approximately $14.5 million of cash was held in escrow under this provision as of June 30, 2003. In July 2003, we signed an amendment to the loan agreement that permits the release of cash placed in escrow for all capital expenditures incurred on the 19 encumbered properties on or after April 1, 2003 (approximately one million as of June 30, 2003). Although the servicer will continue to retain in escrow any excess cash from the encumbered hotels, they will release cash for all capital expenditures we have incurred from April 1, 2003 through the date of the amendment and future capital expenditures we incur on the 19 properties.

      Notes payable to MeriStar Hospitality. On July 1, 2003, MeriStar Hospitality completed an offering of $170 million aggregate principal amount of 9.5% convertible subordinated notes due 2010. The convertible notes are unsecured obligations and provide for semi-annual payments of interest on October 1 and April 1. The proceeds from the new issuance were used to repurchase $150.6 million of their $154.3 million 4.75% convertible notes due 2004 and $22.6 million of their $205 million senior subordinated notes due in 2007.

      In connection with this offering, during the third quarter of 2003, we anticipate refinancing with MeriStar Hospitality all or a portion of our term loan that comes due in 2004, under terms matching those of MeriStar Hospitality’s 9.5% convertible notes due 2010.

      Credit facility. In May 2003, we reduced our borrowing capacity on our senior credit facility from $100 million to $50 million and wrote off approximately $0.7 million in related deferred financing costs. As of June 30, 2003, we had no outstanding borrowings under this facility.

      This facility contains customary financial compliance measures, which became more stringent on a quarterly basis beginning in the first quarter of 2003. The sale of two hotels during the fourth quarter of 2002, one in January 2003, and one in April 2003, as well as the settlement of our note receivable with Interstate Hotels, impacted our leverage covenant due to the loss of trailing 12-month EBITDA (as defined in the credit agreement) on a pro forma basis. If we are not in compliance with the leverage covenant or any other financial

11

covenants at the end of a quarterly measuring period, we will be in default under the credit facility and will not be permitted to borrow under the credit facility. We have obtained a waiver of compliance with this leverage covenant from our lending group, which was extended through August 20, 2003. Because we do not anticipate needing to draw under the bank line or having borrowing capacity to do so in the near term, we expect to terminate the facility late in late 2003. We have approximately $0.6 million of unamortized capitalized financing costs related to this facility as of June 30, 2003, which would be written off should we decide to terminate the facility.

      Derivatives. As of June 30, 2003, we had one swap agreement with a notional principal amount of $100 million that does not qualify for treatment as a cash-flow hedge under SFAS No. 133. This swap agreement is currently being marked to market through our statement of operations. The fair value of this swap as of June 30, 2003 was a liability of $0.6 million, and is included in other liabilities in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet. We made additional cash payments on this swap of $0.6 million through its date of expiration, July 31, 2003.

      During the three and six months ended June 30, 2003, we recognized $1.3 million and $3.4 million, respectively, of income related to the decrease in fair value of the liability recorded for the interest rate swaps in place in those time periods. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2003, we made cash payments on these swaps of $1.3 million and $3.4 million, respectively. The change in fair value and the swap payments are netted together on our statement of operations.

      During the six months ended June 30, 2002, we recognized $2.9 million of income related to the decrease in fair value of the liability recorded for the interest rate swaps in place in that time period. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2002, we made cash payments on these swaps of $3.1 million and $6 million, respectively. The change in fair value and the swap payments are netted together on our statement of operations.

7.          Partnership Units and Minority Interests

      OP Units. Our partnership agreement provides for five classes of partnership interests: Common OP Units, Class B OP Units, Class C OP Units, Class D OP Units and Profits-Only OP Units (POPs).

      Redeemable OP Unit holders converted 878,000 and 400,000 of their OP Units, with a value of $20.1 million and $6.1 million, into MeriStar Hospitality’s common stock during the six months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002 respectively. There were no material conversions for cash during the six months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002.

      POPs totaling 50,000 were relinquished in connection with the formal separation of management functions with Interstate Hotels during the first quarter of 2003. MeriStar Hospitality also issued 50,000 shares of its common stock to a former executive officer and director in connection with the separation.

      In May 2002, we issued 162,500 POPs to an executive officer pursuant to an employment agreement, with a value of $2.9 million.

12

8.          Earnings Per Unit

      The following table presents the computation of basic and diluted earnings per unit (amounts in thousands, except per unit amounts):

			Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended
			June 30,						June 30,
			2003			2002			2003			2002
Basic Earnings Per Unit:
	(Loss) income from continuing operations		$	(216,063	)	$	2,669		$	(287,991	)	$	(9,026	)
	Dividends paid on unvested restricted stock of MeriStar Hospitality			—			(2	)		—			(3	)
	Preferred distributions			(141	)		(141	)		(282	)		(282	)
	(Loss) income available to common stockholders		$	(216,204	)	$	2,526		$	(288,273	)	$	(9,311	)
	Weighted average number of basic OP units outstanding			49,001			48,770			49,017			48,770
	Basic (loss) income per unit from continuing operations		$	(4.41	)	$	0.05		$	(5.88	)	$	(0.19	)
Diluted Earnings Per Unit:
	(Loss) income available to common unitholders		$	(216,204	)	$	2,526		$	(288,273	)	$	(9,311	)
	Weighted average number of basic OP units outstanding			49,001			48,770			49,017			48,770
		Stock options of MeriStar Hospitality		—			75			—			—
	Total weighted average number of diluted OP units outstanding			49,001			48,845			49,017			48,770
	Diluted (loss) income per unit from continuing operations		$	(4.41	)	$	0.05		$	(5.88	)	$	(0.19	)

      For the three months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002, 6,666 units and 5,445 units, respectively, were excluded from the calculation of diluted earnings per unit as the effect of their inclusion would be anti-dilutive. For the six months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002, 6,666 units and 5,373 units, respectively, were excluded from the calculation of diluted earnings per unit as the effect of their inclusion would be anti-dilutive.

9.          Commitments and Contingencies

      Litigation. In the course of our normal business activities, various lawsuits, claims and proceedings have been or may be instituted or asserted against us. Based on currently available facts, we believe that the disposition of matters that are pending or asserted will not have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations or liquidity.

      Minimum Lease Payments. We lease the land at certain of our hotels under long-term arrangements from third parties. Certain leases contain contingent rent features based on gross revenues at the respective

13

property. Future minimum lease payments required under these operating leases as of June 30, 2003 were as follows (dollars in thousands):

2003 (six months)	$	719
2004		1,437
2005		1,440
2006		1,427
2007		1,427
Thereafter		56,368
	$	62,818

      Our obligations under other operating lease commitments, primarily for equipment, are not significant.

      We lease certain office, retail and parking space to outside parties under non-cancelable operating leases with initial or remaining terms in excess of one year. Future minimum rental receipts under these leases as of June 30, 2003 were as follows (dollars in thousands):

2003 (six months)	$	2,349
2004		4,428
2005		2,896
2006		2,027
2007		1,456
Thereafter		1,929
	$	15,085

10.          Asset Dispositions

      We sold three hotels during the third quarter of 2002, two hotels in the fourth quarter of 2002, one in January 2003 and one in April 2003. In July 2003, we sold two hotels that met our criteria for held-for-sale classification as of June 30, 2003 (see Note 4). Operating results for the three and six months ended June 30, 2002 for these nine hotels have been reclassified to discontinued operations, and where applicable included in discontinued operations in the current periods’ results. Results of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2003 included impairment charges of $0.4 million and $2.1 million, respectively.

      Revenue included in discontinued operations for these hotels were (dollars in thousands):

	Three Months Ended				Six Months Ended
	June 30,				June 30,
	2003		2002		2003		2002
Revenue	$	2,564	$	11,285	$	6,808	$	22,724

11.          Consolidating Financial Statements

      Certain of our subsidiaries and MeriStar Hospitality are guarantors of our senior unsecured notes. Certain of our subsidiaries are guarantors of MeriStar Hospitality’s unsecured subordinated notes. All guarantees are full and unconditional, and joint and several. Exhibit 99.1 to this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q presents our supplementary consolidating financial statements, including each of our guarantor subsidiaries. This exhibit presents our consolidating balance sheets as of June 30, 2003 and December 31, 2002, consolidating statements of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002, and consolidating statements of cash flows for the six months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002.

14