XML 45 R19.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.2.0.727
FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
3 Months Ended
Mar. 31, 2015
Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract]  
Fair Value Disclosures [Text Block]
12. FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
 
At December 31, 2014 and March 31, 2015, the carrying values of financial instruments such as cash and cash equivalents, trade receivables and payables, other receivables and accrued liabilities and the current portion of long-term debt approximated their market values, based on the short-term maturities of these instruments.
 
The company calculates fair values for its marketable securities based on quoted market prices for identical assets and liabilities which represents Level 1 of ASC 820-10 fair value hierarchy.
 
At December 31, 2014 and March 31, 2015 the fair values of long-term debt and long-term receivables were comparable with their respective carrying values.
 
The following table presents information about the Company securities based on quoted market prices for identical assets and liabilities for March 31, 2015 and indicates the fair value hierarchy of the valuation technics utilized to determine such fair value.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Three months ended Mar, 31  2015
 
Three months ended March,31 2014
 
 
 
Net Carrying
 
 
 
 
 
Operational
 
Financial Gain
 
 
 
Operational
 
Financial Gain
 
 
 
 
 
Value as of
 
Net Carrying
 
 
 
Gain (losses)
 
(losses)
 
 
 
Gain (losses)
 
(losses)
 
 
 
 
 
December 31,
 
Value as of
 
Fair Value Measured and Recorded Using
 
recognized in
 
recognized in
 
 
 
recognized in
 
recognized in
 
 
 
(in thousands of US Dollars)
 
2014
 
Mar 31, 2015
 
Level 1
 
Level 2
 
Level 3
 
earnings
 
earnings
 
Total
 
earnings
 
earnings
 
Total
 
Assets
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Cash and cash equivalent
 
39,760
 
38,536
 
38,536
 
-
 
-
 
-
 
-
 
-
 
-
 
-
 
-
 
Marketable securities
 
53,074
 
74,637
 
74,637
 
-
 
-
 
-
 
531
 
531
 
-
 
-
 
-
 
Liabilities
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Acquisition liability contingent consideration (a)
 
70,112
 
72,169
 
-
 
-
 
72,169
 
(2,380)
 
-
 
(2,380)
 
(849)
 
 
 
(849)
 
Acquisition liability note (b)
 
-
 
-
 
-
 
-
 
-
 
 
 
 
 
-
 
(3,013)
 
 
 
(3,013)
 
Acquisition liability warrant consideration (c)
 
34,542
 
37,417
 
-
 
-
 
37,417
 
(2,875)
 
-
 
(2,875)
 
(13,777)
 
-
 
(13,777)
 
Deerfield Royalty Agreement (d)
 
6,837
 
6,973
 
 
 
 
 
6,973
 
 
 
(176)
 
(176)
 
 
 
(105)
 
(105)
 
Broadfin Royalty Agreement (d)
 
3,259
 
3,323
 
 
 
 
 
3,323
 
 
 
(83)
 
(83)
 
-
 
(52)
 
(52)
 
Total
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(5,254)
 
(259)
 
(5,513)
 
(17,639)
 
(157)
 
(17,796)
 
 
The fair values of the financial instruments in connection with the acquisition of Éclat (see note 10 Long-Term Debt) are estimated as follows:
 
(a) Acquisition liability contingent consideration: the fair value is estimated using a discounted cash flow model based on probability adjusted projected annual gross profit of each of the products which formed the project portfolio at the time of acquisition of Éclat Pharmaceuticals (Note 10 Long Term Debt).
 
The fair value of the contingent consideration will change over time in accordance with the changes in market conditions and thus business plan projections as the relate to market size, market share, product pricing, competitive landscape, and gross profit margins expected for each of the products.
 
(b) Acquisition liability Note: the Company uses a probability-weighted discounted cash flow model (see note 10 Long Term Debt). The note was repaid on March 24, 2014.
 
(c) Acquisition liability warrant consideration: the Company uses a Black-Scholes option pricing model. The fair value of the warrant consideration will change over time depending on the volatility and share price at balance sheet date (see note 10 Long Term Debt).
 
(d) Broadfin and Deerfield Royalty Agreement: the fair value is estimated using a discounted cash flow model based on probability adjusted projected annual net sales of each of the products which may be approved and sold by Éclat Pharmaceuticals (Note 10 Long Term Debt). The discount rate is 20%.
 
The following tables provide a reconciliation of fair value for which the Company used Level 3 inputs:
 
 
 
Acquisition
 
(in thousands of US Dollars)
 
Liabilities
 
Liability recorded upon acquisition
 
$
(50,927)
 
Operational gain (loss) recognized in earnings for fiscal year 2012
 
$
18,993
 
Operational gain (loss) recognized in earnings for fiscal year 2013
 
$
(28,135)
 
Payment deferred consideration (Hycet)
 
$
841
 
Payment interest on acquisition liability note
 
$
335
 
Operational gain (loss) recognized in earnings for fiscal year 2014
 
$
(60,503)
 
Reimbursment of acquisition liability note
 
$
12,000
 
Payment of interest on acquisition liability note
 
$
1,389
 
Payment of deferred consideration
 
$
1,354
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net carrying value at January 1, 2015
 
$
(104,653)
 
Operational gain (loss) recognized in earnings for three months to Mar 31, 2015
 
$
(5,255)
 
Payment of interest on acquisition liability note
 
$
-
 
Reimbursment of acquisition liability note
 
$
-
 
Payment of deferred consideration
 
$
323
 
Net carrying value at Mar 31, 2015
 
$
(109,586)
 
  
 
 
Deerfield
 
Broadfin
 
 
 
Royalty
 
Royalty
 
(in thousands of US Dollars)
 
Agreement
 
Agreement
 
Liability recorded upon execution of Agreeement
 
$
(2,600)
 
$
(2,187)
 
Interest expense recognized in earnings  for 2013
 
$
(1,990)
 
 
 
 
Interest expense recognized in earnings for 2014
 
$
(2,386)
 
$
(1,139)
 
Payment of Royalty
 
$
140
 
$
67
 
Net carrying value at Jan 1, 2015
 
$
(6,837)
 
$
(3,259)
 
Interest expense recognized in earnings for 3 months to March 31, 2015
 
$
(176)
 
$
(83)
 
Payment of Royalty
 
$
39
 
$
19
 
Net carrying value at Mar 31, 2015
 
$
(6,974)
 
$
(3,323)
 
 
The acquisition liabilities, consisting of the warrants and deferred consideration, and Royalty agreement all of which are classified as long-term debt, are measured at fair value and the income or expense may change significantly as assumptions regarding the valuations and probability of successful development and approval of products in development vary.