Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, Nature of Operations and Other Developments (Policies)	9 Months Ended
Sep. 30, 2015
Accounting Policies [Abstract]
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements That Are Not Yet Effective	Revenue from Contracts with Customers In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-9, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, which provides guidance on the core principle that an entity should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. This standard applies to all contracts with customers, except financial instruments, guarantees, lease contracts, insurance contracts and certain non-monetary exchanges. It provides the following five-step revenue recognition model: (1) identify the contract(s) with a customer, (2) identify the performance obligations in the contract, (3) determine the transaction price, (4) allocate the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract, and (5) recognize revenue when (or as) the entity satisfies a performance obligation. In addition, the standard requires additional disclosure of the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from contracts with customers. In August 2015 the FASB issued ASU 2015-14, Deferral of the Effective Date, which deferred the effective date of ASU 2014-09 to interim and annual periods beginning on January 1, 2018. Management is currently assessing the impact of this guidance on the Company’s financial position and results of operations. Accounting for Share-Based Payments When the Terms of an Award Provide That a Performance Target Could Be Achieved after the Requisite Service Period In June 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-12, Accounting for Share-Based Payments When the Terms of an Award Provide That a Performance Target Could Be Achieved after the Requisite Service Period, which provides guidance that a performance target that affects vesting of a share-based payment and that could be achieved after the completion of the employee’s requisite service period is a performance condition under the accounting guidance for share-based awards. The standard clarifies that the performance target would not be reflected in estimating the fair value of the award at the grant date. Instead, compensation cost for the award would be recognized in the period in which it becomes probable that the performance target will be achieved and should represent the compensation cost attributable to the period(s) for which the requisite service has already been rendered. If the performance target becomes probable of being achieved before the end of the requisite service period, the remaining unrecognized compensation cost should be recognized prospectively over the remaining requisite service period. The total amount of compensation cost recognized during and after the requisite service period should reflect the number of awards that are expected to vest and should be adjusted to reflect those awards that ultimately vest. The guidance is effective for interim and annual periods beginning on January 1, 2016, with early adoption permitted. Management does not expect the adoption of this guidance to significantly impact the Company’s financial position or results of operations. Determining Whether the Host Contract in a Hybrid Financial Instrument Issued in the Form of a Share Is More Akin to Debt or to Equity In November 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-16, Determining Whether the Host Contract in a Hybrid Financial Instrument Issued in the Form of a Share Is More Akin to Debt or to Equity, which provides guidance on identifying whether the host contract in certain hybrid instruments is in the form of debt or equity. Such identification impacts the analysis of whether an embedded derivative exists in the instrument. The standard requires an entity to determine the nature of the host contract by considering all stated and implied substantive terms and features of the hybrid financial instrument, weighing each term and feature on the basis of the relevant facts and circumstances (commonly referred to as the whole-instrument approach). Under this approach, an entity would determine the nature of the host contract by considering the economic characteristics and risks of the entire hybrid financial instrument, including the embedded derivative feature that is being evaluated for separate accounting from the host contract. The guidance is effective for interim and annual periods beginning on January 1, 2016, with early adoption permitted. Management does not expect the adoption of this guidance to significantly impact the Company’s financial position or result of operations. Simplifying Income Statement Presentation by Eliminating the Concept of Extraordinary Items In January 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-01, Simplifying Income Statement Presentation by Eliminating the Concept of Extraordinary Items, which removes the concept of extraordinary items from GAAP and eliminates the requirement for extraordinary items to be separately presented in the statement of income. The guidance is effective for interim and annual periods beginning on January 1, 2016, with early adoption permitted. The guidance may be applied either prospectively or retrospectively. Management does not expect the adoption of this guidance to significantly impact the Company’s financial position or results of operations. Amendments to the Consolidation Analysis In February 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-02, which is intended to improve current GAAP by making changes to targeted areas of the consolidation guidance. This standard simplifies current GAAP as it reduces the number of consolidation models by eliminating specialized consolidation guidance for certain investment funds that are exempt from applying the VIE model. The standard also changes the determination of whether limited partnerships and similar entities are VIEs or voting interest entities, the evaluation of the fees paid to decision makers and the application of the related-party guidance in determining whether a controlling financial interest exists. The guidance is effective for periods beginning on January 1, 2016, with early adoption permitted. The standard may be applied using a modified or full retrospective approach. Management does not expect the adoption of this guidance to significantly impact the Company’s financial position or results of operations. Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs In April 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-03, which now requires that debt issuance costs related to a recognized debt liability be presented in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of that debt liability, consistent with debt discounts. The recognition and measurement guidance for debt issuance costs are not affected by these amendments. The guidance is effective for periods beginning on January 1, 2016, with early adoption permitted and the standard must be applied retrospectively. Management does not expect the adoption of this guidance to significantly impact the Company’s financial position or result of operations. Practical Expedient for the Measurement Date of an Employer’s Defined Benefit Obligation and Plan Assets In April 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-04, Practical Expedient for the Measurement Date of an Employer’s Defined Benefit Obligation and Plan Assets, which provides an employer whose fiscal year-end does not coincide with a calendar month-end a practical expedient to measure defined benefit retirement obligations and related plan assets using the month-end that is closest to its fiscal year-end (rather than the exact date of the fiscal year-end). For an employer that has a significant event in an interim period that calls for a remeasurement of defined benefit plan assets and obligations (such as a plan amendment, settlement, or curtailment), the ASU also provides a practical expedient that permits the employer to remeasure defined benefit plan assets and obligations using the month-end that is closest to the date of the significant event (rather than the exact date of the event). The guidance is effective for interim and annual periods beginning on January 1, 2016, with early adoption permitted. Management does not expect the adoption of this guidance to significantly impact the Company’s financial position or results of operations. Disclosures for Investments in Certain Entities That Calculate Net Asset Value per Share (or Its Equivalent) In May 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-07, Disclosures for Investments in Certain Entities That Calculate Net Asset Value per Share (or Its Equivalent), which removes the requirement to categorize within the fair value hierarchy all investments for which fair value is measured using the net asset value per share practical expedient. Instead, an entity would be required to include those investments as a reconciling line item so that the total fair value amount of investments in the disclosure is consistent with the amount on the balance sheet. The guidance is effective for interim and annual periods beginning on January 1, 2016 and should be applied retrospectively to all periods presented. Earlier application is permitted. Management does not expect the adoption of this guidance to significantly impact the Company’s financial position or results of operations. Presentation and Subsequent Measurement of Debt Issuance Costs Associated with Line-of-Credit Arrangements In August 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-15, which clarifies that an entity may present debt issuance costs associated with line-of-credit arrangements as an asset and subsequently amortize them ratably over the term of the line-of-credit arrangement, regardless of whether there are any outstanding borrowings on the arrangement, as opposed to presenting such costs as a direct reduction from the carrying amount of any associated debt liability. This guidance is effective upon adoption of ASU 2015-03, which is effective for periods beginning January 1, 2016, unless early adopted. Management does not expect the adoption of this guidance to significantly impact the Company’s financial position or results of operations. Simplifying the Accounting for Measurement-Period Adjustments In September 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-16, Simplifying the Accounting for Measurement-Period Adjustments, which eliminates the requirement to restate prior period financial statements for measurement period adjustments. Instead, the new guidance requires that the cumulative impact of a measurement period adjustment (including the impact on prior periods) be recognized in the reporting period in which the adjustment is identified. The guidance is effective for interim and annual periods beginning on January 1, 2016 and should be applied prospectively to measurement period adjustments that occur after the effective date. Early adoption is permitted. Management does not expect the adoption of this guidance to significantly impact the Company’s financial position or results of operations.

Revenue from Contracts with Customers

In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-9, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, which provides guidance on the core principle that an entity should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. This standard applies to all contracts with customers, except financial instruments, guarantees, lease contracts, insurance contracts and certain non-monetary exchanges. It provides the following five-step revenue recognition model: (1) identify the contract(s) with a customer, (2) identify the performance obligations in the contract, (3) determine the transaction price, (4) allocate the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract, and (5) recognize revenue when (or as) the entity satisfies a performance obligation. In addition, the standard requires additional disclosure of the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from contracts with customers. In August 2015 the FASB issued ASU 2015-14, Deferral of the Effective Date, which deferred the effective date of ASU 2014-09 to interim and annual periods beginning on January 1, 2018. Management is currently assessing the impact of this guidance on the Company’s financial position and results of operations.

Accounting for Share-Based Payments When the Terms of an Award Provide That a Performance Target Could Be Achieved after the Requisite Service Period

In June 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-12, Accounting for Share-Based Payments When the Terms of an Award Provide That a Performance Target Could Be Achieved after the Requisite Service Period, which provides guidance that a performance target that affects vesting of a share-based payment and that could be achieved after the completion of the employee’s requisite service period is a performance condition under the accounting guidance for share-based awards. The standard clarifies that the performance target would not be reflected in estimating the fair value of the award at the grant date. Instead, compensation cost for the award would be recognized in the period in which it becomes probable that the performance target will be achieved and should represent the compensation cost attributable to the period(s) for which the requisite service has already been rendered. If the performance target becomes probable of being achieved before the end of the requisite service period, the remaining unrecognized compensation cost should be recognized prospectively over the remaining requisite service period. The total amount of compensation cost recognized during and after the requisite service period should reflect the number of awards that are expected to vest and should be adjusted to reflect those awards that ultimately vest. The guidance is effective for interim and annual periods beginning on January 1, 2016, with early adoption permitted. Management does not expect the adoption of this guidance to significantly impact the Company’s financial position or results of operations.

Determining Whether the Host Contract in a Hybrid Financial Instrument Issued in the Form of a Share Is More Akin to Debt or to Equity

In November 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-16, Determining Whether the Host Contract in a Hybrid Financial Instrument Issued in the Form of a Share Is More Akin to Debt or to Equity, which provides guidance on identifying whether the host contract in certain hybrid instruments is in the form of debt or equity. Such identification impacts the analysis of whether an embedded derivative exists in the instrument. The standard requires an entity to determine the nature of the host contract by considering all stated and implied substantive terms and features of the hybrid financial instrument, weighing each term and feature on the basis of the relevant facts and circumstances (commonly referred to as the whole-instrument approach). Under this approach, an entity would determine the nature of the host contract by considering the economic characteristics and risks of the entire hybrid financial instrument, including the embedded derivative feature that is being evaluated for separate accounting from the host contract. The guidance is effective for interim and annual periods beginning on January 1, 2016, with early adoption permitted. Management does not expect the adoption of this guidance to significantly impact the Company’s financial position or result of operations.

Simplifying Income Statement Presentation by Eliminating the Concept of Extraordinary Items

In January 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-01, Simplifying Income Statement Presentation by Eliminating the Concept of Extraordinary Items, which removes the concept of extraordinary items from GAAP and eliminates the requirement for extraordinary items to be separately presented in the statement of income. The guidance is effective for interim and annual periods beginning on January 1, 2016, with early adoption permitted. The guidance may be applied either prospectively or retrospectively. Management does not expect the adoption of this guidance to significantly impact the Company’s financial position or results of operations.

Amendments to the Consolidation Analysis

In February 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-02, which is intended to improve current GAAP by making changes to targeted areas of the consolidation guidance. This standard simplifies current GAAP as it reduces the number of consolidation models by eliminating specialized consolidation guidance for certain investment funds that are exempt from applying the VIE model. The standard also changes the determination of whether limited partnerships and similar entities are VIEs or voting interest entities, the evaluation of the fees paid to decision makers and the application of the related-party guidance in determining whether a controlling financial interest exists. The guidance is effective for periods beginning on January 1, 2016, with early adoption permitted. The standard may be applied using a modified or full retrospective approach. Management does not expect the adoption of this guidance to significantly impact the Company’s financial position or results of operations.

Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs

In April 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-03, which now requires that debt issuance costs related to a recognized debt liability be presented in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of that debt liability, consistent with debt discounts. The recognition and measurement guidance for debt issuance costs are not affected by these amendments. The guidance is effective for periods beginning on January 1, 2016, with early adoption permitted and the standard must be applied retrospectively. Management does not expect the adoption of this guidance to significantly impact the Company’s financial position or result of operations.

Practical Expedient for the Measurement Date of an Employer’s Defined Benefit Obligation and Plan Assets

In April 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-04, Practical Expedient for the Measurement Date of an Employer’s Defined Benefit Obligation and Plan Assets, which provides an employer whose fiscal year-end does not coincide with a calendar month-end a practical expedient to measure defined benefit retirement obligations and related plan assets using the month-end that is closest to its fiscal year-end (rather than the exact date of the fiscal year-end). For an employer that has a significant event in an interim period that calls for a remeasurement of defined benefit plan assets and obligations (such as a plan amendment, settlement, or curtailment), the ASU also provides a practical expedient that permits the employer to remeasure defined benefit plan assets and obligations using the month-end that is closest to the date of the significant event (rather than the exact date of the event). The guidance is effective for interim and annual periods beginning on January 1, 2016, with early adoption permitted. Management does not expect the adoption of this guidance to significantly impact the Company’s financial position or results of operations.

Disclosures for Investments in Certain Entities That Calculate Net Asset Value per Share (or Its Equivalent)

In May 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-07, Disclosures for Investments in Certain Entities That Calculate Net Asset Value per Share (or Its Equivalent), which removes the requirement to categorize within the fair value hierarchy all investments for which fair value is measured using the net asset value per share practical expedient. Instead, an entity would be required to include those investments as a reconciling line item so that the total fair value amount of investments in the disclosure is consistent with the amount on the balance sheet. The guidance is effective for interim and annual periods beginning on January 1, 2016 and should be applied retrospectively to all periods presented. Earlier application is permitted. Management does not expect the adoption of this guidance to significantly impact the Company’s financial position or results of operations.

Presentation and Subsequent Measurement of Debt Issuance Costs Associated with Line-of-Credit Arrangements

In August 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-15, which clarifies that an entity may present debt issuance costs associated with line-of-credit arrangements as an asset and subsequently amortize them ratably over the term of the line-of-credit arrangement, regardless of whether there are any outstanding borrowings on the arrangement, as opposed to presenting such costs as a direct reduction from the carrying amount of any associated debt liability. This guidance is effective upon adoption of ASU 2015-03, which is effective for periods beginning January 1, 2016, unless early adopted. Management does not expect the adoption of this guidance to significantly impact the Company’s financial position or results of operations.

Simplifying the Accounting for Measurement-Period Adjustments

In September 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-16, Simplifying the Accounting for Measurement-Period Adjustments, which eliminates the requirement to restate prior period financial statements for measurement period adjustments. Instead, the new guidance requires that the cumulative impact of a measurement period adjustment (including the impact on prior periods) be recognized in the reporting period in which the adjustment is identified. The guidance is effective for interim and annual periods beginning on January 1, 2016 and should be applied prospectively to measurement period adjustments that occur after the effective date. Early adoption is permitted. Management does not expect the adoption of this guidance to significantly impact the Company’s financial position or results of operations.