-----BEGIN PRIVACY-ENHANCED MESSAGE----- Proc-Type: 2001,MIC-CLEAR Originator-Name: webmaster@www.sec.gov Originator-Key-Asymmetric: MFgwCgYEVQgBAQICAf8DSgAwRwJAW2sNKK9AVtBzYZmr6aGjlWyK3XmZv3dTINen TWSM7vrzLADbmYQaionwg5sDW3P6oaM5D3tdezXMm7z1T+B+twIDAQAB MIC-Info: RSA-MD5,RSA, LREyGm4DAh0Y48bLRgQ9ogi+X2N8xMP5S4bgR5iLfxW/glmJgvXAIGZuoyxWhS8N Dxiy2+GUWFwlAFj1yXe3qg== 0001047469-99-004034.txt : 19990210 0001047469-99-004034.hdr.sgml : 19990210 ACCESSION NUMBER: 0001047469-99-004034 CONFORMED SUBMISSION TYPE: S-3/A PUBLIC DOCUMENT COUNT: 3 FILED AS OF DATE: 19990209 FILER: COMPANY DATA: COMPANY CONFORMED NAME: UNIONBANCAL CORP CENTRAL INDEX KEY: 0001011659 STANDARD INDUSTRIAL CLASSIFICATION: NATIONAL COMMERCIAL BANKS [6021] IRS NUMBER: 941234979 STATE OF INCORPORATION: CA FISCAL YEAR END: 1231 FILING VALUES: FORM TYPE: S-3/A SEC ACT: SEC FILE NUMBER: 333-67579 FILM NUMBER: 99525869 BUSINESS ADDRESS: STREET 1: 350 CALIFORNIA ST CITY: SAN FRANCISCO STATE: CA ZIP: 94104-1476 BUSINESS PHONE: 4157652969 MAIL ADDRESS: STREET 1: 400 CALIFORNIA ST CITY: SAN FRANCISCO STATE: CA ZIP: 94104-1476 S-3/A 1 FORM S-3/A AS FILED WITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION ON FEBRUARY 9, 1999 REGISTRATION NO. 333-67579 - -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- - -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549 --------------------- AMENDMENT NO. 4 TO FORM S-3 REGISTRATION STATEMENT UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933 --------------------- UNIONBANCAL CORPORATION (Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter) CALIFORNIA 94-1234979 (State or other (I.R.S. employer jurisdiction of identification incorporation or number) organization)
350 CALIFORNIA STREET SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA 94104 415-765-2969 (Address, including zip code, and telephone number, including area code, of Registrant's principal executive offices) JOHN H. MCGUCKIN, JR. EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT UNIONBANCAL CORPORATION 400 CALIFORNIA STREET SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA 94104 415-765-2969 (Name, address, including zip code, and telephone number, including area code, of agent for service) --------------------- COPIES TO: GREGG A. NOEL JEFFREY SMALL DAVID K. LAKHDHIR Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP Davis Polk & Wardwell Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison 300 South Grand Avenue, Suite 3400 450 Lexington Avenue 1285 Avenue of the Americas Los Angeles, California 90071 New York, NY 10017 New York, NY 10019 (213) 687-5000 (212) 450-4000 (212) 373-3000
--------------------- APPROXIMATE DATE OF COMMENCEMENT OF PROPOSED SALE TO THE PUBLIC: AS SOON AS PRACTICABLE AFTER THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THE REGISTRATION STATEMENT. --------------------- If the only securities being registered on this form are being offered pursuant to dividend or interest reinvestment plans, please check the following box. / / If any of the securities being registered on this form are to be offered on a delayed or continuous basis pursuant to Rule 415 under the Securities Act, other than securities being offered only in connection with dividend or interest reinvestment plans, please check the following box. / / If this form is filed to register additional securities for an offering pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act, please check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering. / / If this form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(c) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering. / / If delivery of the prospectus is expected to be made pursuant to Rule 434, please check the following box. / / --------------------- THE REGISTRANT HEREBY AMENDS THIS REGISTRATION STATEMENT ON SUCH DATE OR DATES AS MAY BE NECESSARY TO DELAY ITS EFFECTIVE DATE UNTIL THE REGISTRANT SHALL FILE A FURTHER AMENDMENT WHICH SPECIFICALLY STATES THAT THIS REGISTRATION STATEMENT SHALL THEREAFTER BECOME EFFECTIVE IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 8(a) OF THE SECURITIES ACT OR UNTIL THE REGISTRATION STATEMENT SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE ON SUCH DATE AS THE COMMISSION, ACTING PURSUANT TO SAID SECTION 8(a), MAY DETERMINE. - -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- - -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- EXPLANATORY NOTE This Registration Statement covers the registration of shares of our common stock to be offered in the United States and Canada (the "U.S. Offering") and shares of our common stock to be offered in a concurrent offering outside the United States and Canada (the "International Offering"). The complete form of prospectus relating to the U.S. Offering (the "U.S. Prospectus") follows immediately after this explanatory note. The form of prospectus relating to the International Offering (the "International Prospectus") will be identical in all respects to the U.S. Prospectus, except that the International Prospectus will contain a different front cover page. The form of the U.S. Prospectus included herein is followed by the front cover page of the International Prospectus. The International Prospectus front cover page is labeled "Alternate Page for International Prospectus." THE INFORMATION IN THIS PROSPECTUS IS NOT COMPLETE AND MAY BE CHANGED. THE SELLING SHAREHOLDER MAY NOT SELL THESE SECURITIES UNTIL THE REGISTRATION STATEMENT FILED WITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION IS EFFECTIVE. THIS PROSPECTUS IS NOT AN OFFER TO SELL THESE SECURITIES AND THE SELLING SHAREHOLDER IS NOT SOLICITING AN OFFER TO BUY THESE SECURITIES IN ANY STATE WHERE SUCH OFFER OR SALE IS NOT PERMITTED. PROSPECTUS (SUBJECT TO COMPLETION) ISSUED FEBRUARY 8, 1999 22,000,000 SHARES [LOGO] COMMON STOCK ----------------- THE BANK OF TOKYO-MITSUBISHI, LTD. IS OFFERING 22,000,000 SHARES OF COMMON STOCK OF UNIONBANCAL CORPORATION. THE BANK OF TOKYO-MITSUBISHI, LTD. CURRENTLY OWNS 81.5% OF OUR COMMON STOCK AND WILL OWN 68.3% AFTER THE OFFERING. ------------------- OUR COMMON STOCK IS LISTED ON THE NASDAQ NATIONAL MARKET UNDER THE SYMBOL "UNBC". ON FEBRUARY 8, 1999, THE LAST REPORTED SALE PRICE OF OUR COMMON STOCK WAS $34 PER SHARE. ------------------- INVESTING IN THE COMMON STOCK INVOLVES RISKS. SEE "RISK FACTORS" BEGINNING ON PAGE 10. ----------------- PRICE $ A SHARE -------------------
UNDERWRITING PROCEEDS TO PRICE TO DISCOUNTS AND SELLING PUBLIC COMMISSIONS SHAREHOLDER ------------------ ------------------ ------------------ PER SHARE.......................................... $ $ $ TOTAL.............................................. $ $ $
- --------- THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION AND STATE SECURITIES REGULATORS HAVE NOT APPROVED OR DISAPPROVED THESE SECURITIES, OR DETERMINED IF THIS PROSPECTUS IS TRUTHFUL OR COMPLETE. ANY REPRESENTATION TO THE CONTRARY IS A CRIMINAL OFFENSE. THE BANK OF TOKYO-MITSUBISHI, LTD. HAS GRANTED THE UNDERWRITERS THE RIGHT TO PURCHASE UP TO AN ADDITIONAL 3,300,000 SHARES TO COVER OVER-ALLOTMENTS. MORGAN STANLEY & CO. INCORPORATED EXPECTS TO DELIVER THE SHARES TO PURCHASERS ON , 1999. ------------------- MORGAN STANLEY DEAN WITTER LEHMAN BROTHERS J.P. MORGAN & CO. SALOMON SMITH BARNEY , 1999 TABLE OF CONTENTS
PAGE --------- Prospectus Summary............................. 3 Risk Factors................................... 10 Forward-Looking Statements..................... 14 The Transactions............................... 15 Recent Developments............................ 16 Use of Proceeds................................ 19 Price Range of Common Stock and Dividend Policy....................................... 19 Capitalization................................. 20 Selected Consolidated Financial and Operating Data......................................... 21 Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations................................... 24 PAGE --------- Business....................................... 75 Management..................................... 86 Selling Shareholder............................ 93 Description of Capital Stock................... 94 United States Federal Tax Consequences to Non-United States Holders.................... 96 Underwriters................................... 98 Legal Matters.................................. 101 Experts........................................ 101 Where You Can Find More Information............ 102 Index to Consolidated Financial Statements..... F-1
2 PROSPECTUS SUMMARY YOU SHOULD READ THE FOLLOWING SUMMARY WITH THE MORE DETAILED INFORMATION ABOUT US AND OUR FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, INCLUDING THE NOTES TO THOSE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, INCLUDED IN THIS PROSPECTUS AND IN THE DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE IN THIS PROSPECTUS. WE HAVE RESTATED ALL FINANCIAL INFORMATION IN THIS PROSPECTUS TO REFLECT THE 3-FOR-1 COMMON STOCK SPLIT THAT OCCURRED IN DECEMBER 1998. UNIONBANCAL CORPORATION We are a California-based commercial bank holding company. Our principal subsidiary is Union Bank of California, N.A., which: - was formed through the combination of Union Bank and BanCal Tri-State Corporation in 1996, - is the third largest commercial bank in California, based on total assets and total deposits in California, - is one of the 30 largest banks in the United States, - is one of the oldest banks on the West Coast, dating back to 1864, - has customers located primarily in California, the nation's most populous state, and - had, at September 30, 1998, 244 full-service branches in California, 6 full-service branches in Oregon and Washington, 2 facilities in Texas and New York and 18 offices abroad. At September 30, 1998 we had: - total assets of $31.4 billion, - total deposits of $23.7 billion, and - total shareholders' equity of $3.0 billion. For the nine months ended September 30, 1998, we had: - net income of $352.4 million and - net income per diluted common share of $2.01; net income per diluted common share is our net income per share if all outstanding stock options, for which the average market price during the period exceeded the exercise price, had been converted into common shares. We are presently approximately 82% owned by The Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi, Ltd. THE STRATEGIC REPOSITIONING THE TRANSACTIONS. - The Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi is offering to sell 22 million shares of our common stock to the public. - We are seeking to repurchase approximately $250 million in shares of our common stock from The Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi. - We are also seeking to repurchase 2.1 million shares of our common stock from Meiji Life Insurance Company. - We expect to repurchase the shares of our common stock from The Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi and Meiji Life Insurance Company at the public offering price on the cover page of this prospectus, less underwriting discounts and commissions. 3 - We intend to use the net proceeds of an offering of trust preferred securities to finance both of the repurchases. - We anticipate closing all of these transactions in the first quarter of 1999. EFFECTS OF THE TRANSACTIONS. These transactions are designed to: - improve our return on average common equity and earnings per share and to increase the number of shares available for trading by investors and - raise proceeds for, and increase the amount of equity capital of, The Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi. If we had made the repurchases and had completed the offering of trust preferred securities on January 1, 1998, and everything else had remained the same, we would have: - increased our return on average common equity from 16.87% to 18.29% at September 30, 1998 and - increased our net income per diluted share from $2.01 to $2.03 for the nine months ended September 30, 1998. These transactions will not result in a material change to our ratios of capital to assets by which bank regulators monitor the adequacy of our capital levels. THE SELLING SHAREHOLDER--THE BANK OF TOKYO-MITSUBISHI, LTD. The Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi: - is Japan's largest bank based on total assets, - has a domestic network of 350 branches, sub-branches and agencies, - has an overseas network that includes more than 400 facilities, and - is the majority shareholder of UnionBanCal Corporation, its largest overseas subsidiary. The Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi has stated that it intends to maintain its majority stake in UnionBanCal Corporation after the closing of this offering and the related transactions. BANKING SERVICES Our operations are divided into four primary segments: COMMUNITY BANKING GROUP: - provides a full line of checking and savings, investment, loan and fee-based banking products, - has the fifth largest branch network among depository institutions in California, and - had average assets of $10.3 billion and average deposits of $12.3 billion for the nine months ended September 30, 1998. 4 COMMERCIAL FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP: - provides commercial and project loans, real estate financing, commercial financing based on accounts receivable, inventory, or other short-term assets, lease financing, customized cash management services, selected capital markets products and short-term financing of export/import transactions, including letters of credit and - had average assets of $12.0 billion and average deposits of $5.8 billion for the nine months ended September 30, 1998. TRUST & PRIVATE FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP: - provides investment management and administration services for a broad range of individuals and institutions, including through HighMark Capital Management, Inc. and its family of proprietary HighMark mutual funds and - had over $90 billion in assets under administration as of September 30, 1998. INTERNATIONAL BANKING GROUP: - provides products and services to financial institutions worldwide, particularly in Asia, to facilitate the financing of export/import transactions and payments between the parties to those transactions and - had average assets of $2.1 billion and average deposits of $864 million for the nine months ended September 30, 1998. UnionBanCal Corporation reduced cross-border outstandings to Japan, Taiwan, Korea, Malaysia, Thailand, Vietnam, Singapore, Indonesia, the Philippines, China and Hong Kong by $1.0 billion to $1.5 billion at September 30, 1998 compared to $2.5 billion at December 31, 1997, largely related to the International Banking Group. OPERATING STRATEGY Our operating strategy is to: - capitalize on our strong position in core California market, - strengthen our consumer banking franchise, - focus our commercial banking efforts on specific industries and companies, - diversify our revenue sources and expand our fee-based business, - emphasize our quality customer service, - maintain our high lending standards and our strong asset quality profile, - identify strategic businesses and consider potential acquisitions or divestitures, - improve our operating efficiency, - achieve competitive financial performance targets, and - align our senior management compensation with shareholders' interests. 5 RECENT DEVELOPMENTS -- OUR 1998 RESULTS On January 20, 1999, we announced our financial results for 1998. The audit of our 1998 financial statements is not yet complete. The following presents important financial results for 1998: - Net interest income, on a taxable-equivalent basis, of $1.3 billion, compared to $1.2 billion in 1997. A taxable-equivalent basis means as adjusted to treat non-taxable income and income on which we receive beneficial tax treatment as if each were taxable at our effective tax rate. - Provision for credit losses of $45.0 million, compared to no provision in 1997. - Noninterest income of $533.5 million, compared to $463.0 million in 1997. - Noninterest expense of $1.1 billion, compared to $1.0 billion in 1997. - Income before taxes, on a taxable-equivalent basis, of $676.0 million, compared to $655.3 million in 1997. - Net income of $466.5 million, compared to $411.3 million in 1997. See "Recent Developments" on page 16 for a more detailed discussion of our 1998 financial results. ------------------- Our principal executive offices are located at 350 California Street, San Francisco, California, 94104, and our telephone number is (415) 765-2969. 6 THE OFFERING THE FOLLOWING SUMMARIZES THE BANK OF TOKYO-MITSUBISHI'S OFFERING OF OUR COMMON STOCK. WE ARE PRESENTING THE INFORMATION AS IF THE UNDERWRITERS DID NOT EXERCISE THE OVER-ALLOTMENT OPTION. Common stock offered by The Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi............. 22,000,000 shares Over-allotment option............. 3,300,000 shares Common stock offered in: U.S. offering................... 17,600,000 shares International offering.......... 4,400,000 shares Total......................... 22,000,000 shares Common stock to be repurchased in connection with this offering... 9,545,462 shares, based on a repurchase price for our common stock of $34 11/16, less underwriting discounts and commissions of 3.2%. Common stock to be outstanding after this offering and the repurchases..................... 165,726,774 shares, based on shares outstanding as of January 29, 1999. This does not include 1,728,180 shares of our common stock that are issuable upon exercise of stock options that we have granted under our stock incentive plans, of which options to purchase 909,385 shares are currently outstanding and exercisable. Use of proceeds................... We will not receive any of the net proceeds from this offering. Nasdaq National Market symbol..... UNBC
7 SUMMARY CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL AND OPERATING DATA The summary financial and other data as of December 31, 1996 and 1997 and September 30, 1998 and for the years ended December 31, 1995, 1996 and 1997 and for the nine-month period ended September 30, 1998 are calculated from our audited consolidated financial statements included in this prospectus. The summary financial and other data as of December 31, 1995 are calculated from our audited consolidated financial statements that are not included in this prospectus. The summary financial and other data as of September 30, 1997 and for the nine-month period ended September 30, 1997 are calculated from our unaudited consolidated financial statements included in this prospectus, which, in the opinion of our management, include all adjustments necessary for a fair presentation of our financial position at such date and the results of operations for such interim periods. The results for the nine-month period ended September 30, 1998 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected of the full fiscal year. You should read the following data with the more detailed information contained in "Selected Consolidated Financial and Operating Data," "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" and our consolidated financial statements and the notes to the consolidated financial statements, each included in this prospectus. You should read the following information with the data in the table on the next page: - We have presented net interest income and income before income taxes on a taxable-equivalent basis using the federal statutory tax rate of 35 percent. - We have annualized return on average assets, return on average common equity, net interest margin and net loans charged off to average total loans for the nine-month periods. - Noninterest expense includes merger and integration expense, which was $117 million for 1996, $6 million for 1997 and $6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 1997. - The efficiency ratio is noninterest expense not including foreclosed asset expense, or income, as a percentage of the sum of net interest income and noninterest income. - The Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio is computed by dividing Tier 1 capital, which is total shareholders' equity less net unrealized gains and losses on securities available for sale and intangible assets, by risk weighted period-end assets. Risk weighted period-end assets is the balance at risk less the portion of the allowance for credit losses which exceeds 1.25% of the balance at risk. The balance at risk is calculated by applying risk weight percentages per regulatory guidelines to total assets and off-balance sheet items. - The total risk-based capital ratio is total capital, which includes Tier 1 capital, subordinated debt, and 1.25% of the balance at risk, divided by risk weighted period-end assets. 8
NINE MONTHS ENDED YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, SEPTEMBER 30, ---------------------------------- ---------------------- 1995 1996 1997 1997 1998 ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- (DOLLARS IN MILLIONS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AND RATIO DATA) RESULTS OF OPERATIONS: Net interest income................................ $ 1,153 $ 1,175 $ 1,237 $ 917 $ 983 Provision for credit losses........................ 53 40 -- -- 45 Noninterest income................................. 395 419 463 343 400 Noninterest expense................................ 978 1,135 1,045 762 836 ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- Income before income taxes......................... 517 419 655 498 502 Taxable-equivalent adjustment...................... 11 7 5 4 4 Income tax expense................................. 193 163 239 175 146 ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- Net income......................................... $ 313 $ 249 $ 411 $ 319 $ 352 ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- NET INCOME APPLICABLE TO COMMON STOCK................ $ 302 $ 238 $ 404 $ 311 $ 352 ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- PER COMMON SHARE: Net income -- basic................................ $ 1.74 $ 1.37 $ 2.31 $ 1.78 $ 2.01 Net income -- diluted.............................. 1.73 1.36 2.30 1.78 2.01 Common shares outstanding (end of period, in thousands)........................................ 174,180 174,458 174,918 174,848 175,208 BALANCE SHEET DATA (END OF PERIOD): Total assets....................................... $ 27,547 $ 29,234 $ 30,585 $ 30,982 $ 31,407 Total loans........................................ 20,432 21,050 22,741 22,298 23,498 Nonperforming assets............................... 247 157 130 133 81 Total deposits..................................... 19,655 21,533 23,296 22,974 23,663 Common equity...................................... 2,349 2,360 2,679 2,615 2,985 OTHER DATA: Return on average assets........................... 1.22% 0.89% 1.39% 1.45% 1.56% Return on average common equity.................... 13.73 10.24 16.05 16.85 16.87 Efficiency ratio................................... 63.39 71.02 61.53 60.55 60.51 Net interest margin................................ 5.05 4.75 4.70 4.70 4.86 Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio.................... 9.35 9.08 8.96 8.92 9.53 Total risk-based capital ratio..................... 11.70 11.17 11.05 11.02 11.51 Net loans charged off to average total loans....... 0.32 0.34 0.33 0.28 0.12 Nonperforming assets to total loans and foreclosed assets............................................ 1.21 0.74 0.57 0.60 0.35
9 RISK FACTORS YOU SHOULD CAREFULLY CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING RISKS AS WELL AS THE OTHER INFORMATION CONTAINED OR INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE IN THIS PROSPECTUS BEFORE PURCHASING THE COMMON STOCK. POOR ECONOMIC CONDITIONS IN CALIFORNIA MAY CAUSE US TO INCUR LOSSES A substantial majority of our assets and deposits are generated in California. As a result, poor economic conditions in California may cause us to incur losses associated with higher default rates and decreased collateral values in our loan portfolio. In the early 1990s, the California economy experienced an economic recession that resulted in increases in the level of delinquencies and losses for us and many of the state's financial institutions. If California were to experience another recession, we expect that our level of problem assets would increase accordingly. The current economic crisis in Asia and the unstable economic conditions in Latin America are expected to continue to negatively impact the economic conditions in California, which could adversely affect our business. POOR ECONOMIC CONDITIONS AFFECTING PARTICULAR INDUSTRIES COULD HAVE AN ADVERSE EFFECT ON OUR CUSTOMERS AND THEIR ABILITY TO MAKE PAYMENTS TO US We are also affected by certain industry-specific economic factors. For example, a portion of our total loan portfolio is related to real estate obligations, and a portion of our recent growth has been fueled by the general real estate recovery in California. Accordingly, a downturn in the real estate industry in California could have an adverse effect on our operations. Similarly, a portion of our total loan portfolio is to borrowers in the agricultural industry. Last year's weather effects of "El Nino," combined with low commodity prices, may adversely affect the agricultural industry and, consequently, may impact our business negatively. WE MAY NOT ATTAIN OUR LONG-TERM FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE GOALS DUE TO ADVERSE FACTORS In connection with our strategic repositioning, we have developed long-term financial performance goals, which we expect to result from the successful implementation of our operating strategies. We cannot assure you that we will be successful in achieving these long-term goals or that our operating strategies will be successful. Achieving success in these areas is dependent upon a number of factors, many of which are beyond our direct control. Factors that may adversely affect our ability to attain our long-term financial performance goals include: - deterioration of our asset quality; - our inability to reduce non-interest expenses; - our inability to increase non-interest income; - our inability to decrease reliance on asset revenues; - regulatory and other impediments associated with making acquisitions; - deterioration in general economic conditions, especially in our core markets; - decreases in net interest rate margins; - increases in competition; - adverse regulatory developments; - unexpected increased costs related to any potential acquisitions; - unexpected increased costs associated with implementation of the efficiency improvement project; and - unavailability of stock to repurchase at acceptable prices. 10 FLUCTUATIONS IN INTEREST RATES COULD ADVERSELY AFFECT OUR BUSINESS Significant increases in market interest rates, or the perception that an increase may occur, could adversely affect both our ability to originate new loans and our ability to grow. Conversely, a decrease in interest rates could result in an acceleration in the prepayment of loans. In addition, changes in market interest rates, or changes in the relationships between short-term and long-term market interest rates, or changes in the relationships between different interest rate indices, could affect the interest rates charged on interest-earning assets differently than the interest rates paid on interest-bearing liabilities. This difference could result in an increase in interest expense relative to interest income. An increase in market interest rates also could adversely affect the ability of our floating-rate borrowers to meet their higher payment obligations. If this occurred, it could cause an increase in non-performing assets and net charge-offs, which could adversely affect our business. FAILURE TO COMPLETE ANY OF THE TRANSACTIONS COULD RESULT IN CANCELLATION OF THIS OFFERING AND FEWER BENEFITS TO US Although UnionBanCal Corporation and The Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi intend to complete this offering, the offering of trust preferred securities and the repurchases during the first quarter of 1999, these transactions may not occur. This offering and the repurchases are dependent upon each other. Accordingly, if either of the repurchases does not occur, then the parties to this offering are not required to complete this offering. Even if the parties to this offering decided to proceed with the offering without one or both of the repurchases, we would not recognize the anticipated benefits of the transactions as a whole. THE BANK OF TOKYO-MITSUBISHI, LTD. ELECTS ALL OF OUR DIRECTORS AND CONTROLS SHAREHOLDER VOTES; YOUR INTERESTS MAY NOT BE THE SAME AS THE BANK OF TOKYO-MITSUBISHI'S INTERESTS Upon completion of this offering and the repurchases, The Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi will continue to own a majority of the outstanding shares of our common stock. The Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi will continue to be able to elect all of our directors and effectively to control the vote on all matters, including determinations such as: - approval of mergers or other business combinations; - sales of all or substantially all of our assets; - any matters submitted to a vote of our shareholders; - issuance of any additional common stock or other equity securities; - incurrence of debt other than in the ordinary course of business; - the selection and tenure of our Chief Executive Officer; - payment of dividends on common stock or other equity securities; and - matters that might be favorable to The Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi. The Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi's ability to prevent an unsolicited bid for UnionBanCal Corporation or any other change in control could have an adverse effect on the market price for our common stock. A majority of UnionBanCal Corporation's directors are not officers or employees of UnionBanCal Corporation or any of its affiliates, including The Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi. However, because of The Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi's control over the election of our directors, it could change the composition of our Board of Directors so that it would not have a majority of outside directors. 11 A DETERIORATON IN THE BANK OF TOKYO-MITSUBISHI, LTD.'S FINANCIAL CONDITION COULD RESULT IN AN INCREASE IN OUR BORROWNG COSTS AND COULD OTHERWISE ADVERSELY AFFECT OUR OPERATIONS Although we fund our operations independently of The Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi and believe our business is not necessarily closely related to its business or outlook, its credit ratings may affect our credit ratings. The Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi's credit ratings were downgraded in October 1998 by Standard and Poor's Corporation and in January 1999 by Moody's Investors Service, Inc. Any future downgrading of its credit rating could adversely affect our credit ratings. Therefore, as long as The Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi maintains a majority interest in UnionBanCal Corporation, a deterioration in The Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi's financial condition could result in an increase in our borrowing costs and could impair our access to the public and private capital markets. The Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi is also governed by regulatory oversight and review. Our business operations and expansion plans could be negatively affected by regulatory concerns related to the Japanese financial system and The Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi. POTENTIAL CONFLICTS OF INTEREST WITH THE BANK OF TOKYO-MITSUBISHI, LTD. COULD LIMIT OUR ABILITY TO APPROVE SPECIFIED CREDITS AND CATEGORIES OF CUSTOMERS AND COULD OTHERWISE ADVERSELY AFFECT OUR OPERATIONS As part of The Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi's normal risk management processes, it manages its global credit risks and concentrations on an aggregate basis, including UnionBanCal Corporation. Therefore, at some levels, our ability to approve specified credits and categories of customers is dependent upon concurrence by The Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi. We may wish to extend credit to the same customer as The Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi. Our ability to do so may be limited for various reasons, including The Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi's aggregate credit risk and marketing policies. Our directors' and officers' ownership interests in The Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi's common stock or service as a director or officer or other employee of both UnionBanCal Corporation and The Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi could create or appear to create potential conflicts of interest, especially since both of us compete in the United States banking industry. SUBSTANTIAL COMPETITION IN THE CALIFORNIA BANKING MARKET COULD HAVE A NEGATIVE EFFECT ON OUR BUSINESS Banking is a highly competitive business. We compete actively for loan, deposit, and other financial services business in California, as well as nationally and internationally. Our competitors include a large number of state and national banks, thrift institutions and major foreign-affiliated or foreign banks, as well as many financial and nonfinancial firms that offer services similar to those offered by us. Some of our competitors are community banks that have strong local market positions. Other competitors include large financial institutions, such as Bank of America, California Federal, Washington Mutual, and Wells Fargo, that have substantial capital, technology and marketing resources. Such large financial institutions may have greater access to capital at a lower cost than we do, which may adversely affect our ability to compete effectively. In addition, there have been a number of recent mergers involving financial institutions located in California. Some of the merged banks, such as Wells Fargo after its merger with Norwest, employ a strong community-based banking model of doing business that may increase competition with our distinctive combination of traditional community bank service coupled with a large branch network. STATUTORY RESTRICTIONS ON DIVIDENDS AND OTHER DISTRIBUTIONS FROM OUR SUBSIDIARIES AND OUR SUBSIDIARIES' OBLIGATIONS TO PAY CREDITORS COULD LIMIT AMOUNTS OUR SUBSIDIARIES MAY PAY TO US A substantial portion of our cash flow typically comes from dividends that our bank and nonbank subsidiaries pay to us. Various statutory provisions restrict the amount of dividends our subsidiaries can pay to us without regulatory approval. In addition, if any of our subsidiaries liquidates, that subsidiary's creditors 12 will be entitled to receive distributions from the assets of that subsidiary to satisfy their claims against it before we, as a holder of an equity interest in the subsidiary, will be entitled to receive any of the assets of the subsidiary. If, however, we are a creditor of the subsidiary with recognized claims against it, we would be in the same position as other creditors. ADVERSE EFFECTS OF BANKING REGULATIONS OR CHANGES IN BANKING REGULATIONS COULD ADVERSELY AFFECT OUR BUSINESS We are governed by significant federal and state regulation and supervision, which is primarily for the benefit and protection of our customers and not for the benefit of our investors. In the past, our business has been materially affected by these regulations. This trend is likely to continue in the future. Laws, regulations or policies currently affecting us and our subsidiaries may change at any time. Regulatory authorities may also change their interpretation of these statutes and regulations. Therefore, our business may be adversely affected by any future changes in laws, regulations, policies or interpretations. Additionally, our international activities may be regulated by the laws and regulations of the jurisdiction where business is being conducted. International laws, regulations and policies affecting us and our subsidiaries may change at any time and affect our business opportunities and competitiveness in these jurisdictions. Due to The Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi's controlling ownership of UnionBanCal Corporation, laws, regulations and policies adopted or enforced by the Government of Japan may adversely affect our activities and investments and those of our subsidiaries in the future. Under a long-standing policy of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, a bank holding company is expected to act as a source of financial strength for its subsidiary banks. As a result of that policy, we may be required to commit financial and other resources to our subsidiary bank in circumstances where we might not otherwise do so. THE YEAR 2000 PROBLEM COULD DISRUPT OUR BUSINESS The year 2000 problem results from an inability of computer systems to accurately recognize dates on and after the year 2000. The year 2000 problem is a broad business issue that extends beyond computer failures to possible failures of entire infrastructures, such as telecommunications and data networks, building facilities and security systems and systems of other institutions, including governmental agencies, to settle transactions. Many of our critical operations are not presently ready to operate normally in the year 2000 and beyond, although preparations are underway to correct this. We are preparing for the century change with an enterprise-wide year 2000 program. As part of the program, we have identified all of the major application and processing systems and have sought external and internal resources to replace and test the systems. We are testing purchased software, internally developed systems and systems supported by external parties as part of the program. We are evaluating customers and vendors that have significant relationships with us to determine whether they are adequately preparing for the year 2000. In addition, we are developing contingency plans to reduce the impact of some potential events that may occur. However, we cannot guarantee that the systems of vendors or customers with whom we do business will be year 2000 compliant on a timely basis, or that contingency plans will shield operations from failures that may occur. The year 2000 problem poses the following principal risks to our business: - disruption of our business due to our failure to achieve year 2000 readiness; - disruption of our business due to failure of third parties to achieve year 2000 readiness; and - disruption in our funding and repayment operations due to failure of fund providers and obligors to achieve year 2000 readiness. 13 We estimate that the total cost of the year 2000 project will be approximately $50 million. We are funding the cost of the year 2000 project by normal operating cash flow. We are staffing the year 2000 project with external people as well as internal staff re-deployed from less time-sensitive assignments. Our estimated total cost could change further as analysis continues. Because of the range of possible issues and the large number of variables involved, however, we cannot definitively quantify the potential costs. For example, our remediation efforts or the efforts of third parties may be unsuccessful. Any failure of such remediation efforts could result in a loss of business, damage to our reputation or legal liability. Consequently, such failures could have a material adverse effect on our business. POSSIBLE FUTURE SALES OF SHARES OF OUR COMMON STOCK BY THE BANK OF TOKYO-MITSUBISHI, LTD. COULD CAUSE THE MARKET PRICE OF OUR COMMON STOCK TO DECREASE OR COULD ADVERSELY AFFECT OUR CREDIT RATINGS Although The Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi has announced its intention to maintain its majority ownership in UnionBanCal Corporation, it may sell shares of our common stock in compliance with the federal securities laws after the completion of this offering and the repurchase of our common stock from them. The federal securities laws and the restrictions discussed below will be the only restrictions on The Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi's ability to sell. They have agreed not to sell any shares of our common stock, except for the shares they are selling to us in the repurchase, for 180 days after the date of this prospectus without the prior written consent of Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated. By virtue of its current control of UnionBanCal Corporation, The Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi could sell large amounts of its shares of our common stock by causing us to file a registration statement that would allow them to sell shares more easily. In addition, The Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi could sell its shares of our common stock without registration under Rule 144 of the Securities Act. Although we can make no prediction as to the effect, if any, that such sales would have on the market price of our common stock, sales of substantial amounts of our common stock, or the perception that such sales could occur, could adversely affect market prices or could adversely affect our credit ratings. If The Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi sells or transfers its shares of our common stock as a block, another person or entity could become the controlling shareholder of UnionBanCal Corporation. FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS This prospectus and the information incorporated by reference includes forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The discussions on page 85 regarding our intention to attain new financial performance targets and to improve our operating efficiency are forward-looking statements. In addition, some of the forward-looking statements can be identified by the use of forward-looking words such as "believes," "expects," "may," "will," "should," "seeks," "approximately," "intends," "plans," "estimates," or "anticipates" or the negative of those words or other comparable terminology. Forward-looking statements involve inherent risks and uncertainties. A number of important factors could cause actual results to differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements. Some factors include fluctuations in interest rates, inflation, government regulations, and economic conditions and competition in the geographic and business areas in which we conduct our operations. For a discussion of factors that could cause actual results to differ, please see the discussion under "Risk Factors" contained in this prospectus and in other information contained in our publicly available SEC filings. 14 THE TRANSACTIONS The Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi is offering to sell 22 million shares of our common stock to the public. In addition, we are seeking to repurchase $250 million in shares of our common stock from The Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi and 2.1 million shares from Meiji Life Insurance Company at the same time as this offering. We expect to repurchase the shares at the public offering price set forth on the cover page of this prospectus, less the underwriting discounts and commissions. We intend to use the net proceeds of an offering of trust preferred securities to finance both of the repurchases. We anticipate closing these transactions in the first quarter of 1999. These transactions are designed to: - improve our return on average common equity and earnings per share and to increase the number of shares available for trading by investors. - raise proceeds for, and increase the amount of equity capital of, The Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi. If we had made the repurchases and had completed the offering of trust preferred securities on January 1, 1998, and everything else had remained the same, we would have: - increased our return on average common equity from 16.87% to 18.29% at September 30, 1998; and - increased our net income per diluted common share from $2.01 to $2.03 for the nine months ended September 30, 1998; net income per diluted common share is our net income per share if all outstanding stock options, for which the average market price during the period exceeded the exercise price, had been converted into common shares. We believe these transactions will provide us with additional benefits. They should increase the level of market research coverage we receive from equity analysts and should make it easier for us to use shares of our common stock to pay for acquisitions. These transactions will not result in a material change to our ratios of capital to assets by which bank regulators monitor the adequacy of our capital levels. 15 RECENT DEVELOPMENTS On January 20, 1999, we announced our financial results for 1998. The audit of our 1998 financial statements is not yet complete. The following table presents important financial results for 1997 and 1998.
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, ---------------------------- 1997 1998 ------------- ------------- (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) (UNAUDITED) RESULTS OF OPERATIONS: Net interest income, on a taxable-equivalent basis............................ $ 1,237,010 $ 1,322,655 Provision for credit losses................................................... -- 45,000 Noninterest income............................................................ 463,001 533,531 Noninterest expense........................................................... 1,044,665 1,135,218 Income before taxes, on a taxable-equivalent basis............................ 655,346 675,968 Net income.................................................................... 411,296 466,461 BALANCE SHEET DATA (END OF PERIOD): Total assets.................................................................. $ 30,585,265 $ 32,276,316 Total loans................................................................... 22,741,408 24,296,111 Total deposits................................................................ 23,296,374 24,507,879 Common equity................................................................. 2,679,299 3,058,244
- - Net income was $466.5 million in 1998, or $2.65 per diluted common share. In 1997, net income was $411.3 million, and net income applicable to common stock was $403.7 million, or $2.30 per diluted common share. - Excluding a tax benefit of $60.2 million related to a reduction in California state franchise taxes, which arises from our filing a worldwide unitary tax return with The Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi, net income for 1998 was $406.3 million, or $2.31 per diluted common share. - Excluding an after-tax refund from the California Franchise Tax Board received in the third quarter of 1997, net income applicable to common stock in 1997 was $379.0 million, or $2.16 per diluted common share. - - For 1998, return on average assets was 1.53 percent and return on average common equity was 16.39 percent compared to 1.39 percent for return on average assets and 16.05 percent for return on average common equity for 1997. - - Net interest income, on a taxable-equivalent basis, increased 6.9 percent to $1.3 billion in 1998, primarily due to a $1.2 billion, or 4.5 percent, increase in average earning assets, resulting primarily from a $1.4 billion, or 6.2 percent, increase in average loans. A taxable-equivalent basis means as adjusted to treat non-taxable income and income on which we receive beneficial tax treatment as if each was taxable at our effective tax rate. - - Net interest margin in 1998 was 4.81 percent, up from 4.70 percent in 1997. The increase in net interest margin was primarily due to a $1.1 billion, or 14.7 percent, increase in average noninterest bearing deposits, which funded a significant portion of the growth in average loans. - - Noninterest income in 1998 was $533.5 million, up $70.5 million, or 15.2 percent, from 1997. - Service charges on deposit accounts grew $24.2 million, or 21.1 percent, reflecting strong growth in deposit balances and an expansion of products and services. 16 - Trust and investment management fees increased $13.7 million, or 12.7 percent, on strong growth in trust accounts and assets under management. - International fees and commissions increased $5.9 million, or 8.9 percent. - Other noninterest income increased $26.7 million in 1998, primarily due to a $17.1 million gain from the sale of the credit card portfolio in second quarter 1998. - - Noninterest expense was $1.1 billion in 1998, up $90.6 million, or 8.7 percent, from 1997. Personnel-related expenses increased $45.9 million, or 8.0 percent, primarily due to higher performance-based incentive compensation and regular merit increases. Other noninterest expense increased $40.8 million, or 12.3 percent, comprised primarily of: - an $8.7 million increase in professional fees due to additional costs related to the year 2000 program, - an increase of $8.3 million in expenses incurred to support higher deposit volumes, - an increase of $8.2 million in other outside service expenses, and - an increase of $3.2 million in marketing expenses. - - The 1998 effective tax rate was 30.5 percent, compared with 36.7 percent for 1997. The primary reason for the lower 1998 effective tax rate was the filing of our 1997, and our intention to file our 1998, California franchise tax returns on a worldwide unitary basis, which incorporates the results of The Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi and its worldwide affiliates. - The reductions in income tax expense related to the unitary filings for 1998 were approximately $60.2 million. - The effective tax rate for 1997 was favorably affected by an after-tax refund of $24.7 million from the California Franchise Tax Board for tax years 1975-1987. - Excluding the state tax reduction in 1998 and the California Franchise Tax Board refund in 1997, the effective tax rate for 1998 would have been 39.5 percent and 40.5 percent for 1997. - - Nonperforming assets at December 31, 1998 were $89.9 million, down $40.0 million, or 30.8 percent, from December 31, 1997. Nonperforming assets were 0.28 percent of total assets on December 31, 1998, down from 0.42 percent from a year earlier. - - Net loans charged off as a percentage of average total loans were 0.15 percent in 1998 down from 0.33 percent in 1997. - - The provision for credit losses for 1998 was $45.0 million, compared to no provision made for full year 1997. - The provision for credit losses is charged to income to bring the allowance for credit losses to a level deemed appropriate by management based on the various factors that are used to determine the adequacy of the allowance based on losses inherent in the loan and lease portfolio. - At December 31, 1998, the allowance for credit losses as a percent of total loans was 1.89 percent and as a percent of nonaccrual loans was 585.5 percent. These ratios compare with 1.99 percent and 413.1 percent at December 31, 1997. - - Tangible common equity to assets was 9.3% as of December 31, 1998. - Tangible common equity to assets is computed by dividing period end common equity less unamortized goodwill, which was $63.3 million, by total assets less unamortized goodwill. 17 - - The following presents important financial information for our four primary business segments as of December 31, 1998. As used in the following table, "performance center earnings" represent the allocation of net interest income, noninterest income and noninterest expense between the business segments for products and services originated in one segment but managed by another. "Total loans" and "total deposits" represent loans and deposits for each business segment before allocation between the segments of loans and deposits originated in one segment but managed by another. "Net interest income" and "income before income taxes" are presented on a taxable-equivalent basis.
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1998 -------------------------------------------------------------------- TRUST & INTERNATIONAL PRIVATE COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL FINANCIAL BANKING FINANCIAL BANKING GROUP SERVICES GROUP GROUP SERVICES GROUP -------------- -------------------- ------------ ---------------- RESULTS OF OPERATIONS: (IN THOUSANDS) Net interest income...................... $ 673,463 $ 494,713 $ 55,741 $ 22,979 Noninterest income....................... 178,208 109,520 65,834 145,593 -------------- -------- ------------ -------- Total.................................... 851,671 604,233 121,575 168,572 -------------- -------- ------------ -------- Noninterest expense...................... 596,714 257,124 66,967 134,977 Credit expense........................... 4,300 21,316 11,304 345 Performance center earnings (losses)..... 7,769 2,270 (4,087) 122 Income before income tax expense......... 258,426 328,063 39,217 33,372 BALANCE SHEET DATA (PERIOD AVERAGE): (IN MILLIONS) Total loans before performance centers... $ 9,328 $ 11,164 $ 1,356 $ 258 Total assets............................. 10,270 12,414 2,070 315 Total deposits before performance centers................................. 12,444 5,985 851 675 OTHER DATA: Return on average assets................. 1.52% 1.61% 1.18% 6.43% Efficiency ratio......................... 70.06 42.55 55.07 80.08
18 USE OF PROCEEDS The net proceeds to be received by The Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi from the sale of common stock in the offering, after deducting estimated expenses of $1,820,000 and underwriting discounts and commissions, are estimated to be approximately $736,885,000, assuming a public offering price of $34 11/16, which was the last reported sale price of our common stock on the Nasdaq National Market on February 4, 1999. All net proceeds from the sale of the shares of our common stock in this offering will go to The Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi. Accordingly, we will not receive any of the proceeds from this sale of shares of our common stock. PRICE RANGE OF COMMON STOCK AND DIVIDEND POLICY Our common stock is quoted on the Nasdaq National Market under the symbol "UNBC". The following table sets forth the high and low closing sale prices for our common stock for the periods indicated, as reported by the Nasdaq National Market, and the cash dividends declared on the common stock during such periods.
COMMON STOCK CASH PRICE(1) DIVIDENDS -------------------- DECLARED PER HIGH LOW SHARE(1) --------- --------- ------------- Year ended December 31, 1997 First quarter................................................................. $ 21.00 $ 17.63 $ 0.117 Second quarter................................................................ 25.96 16.92 0.117 Third quarter................................................................. 29.50 23.92 0.140 Fourth quarter................................................................ 35.83 27.83 0.140 Year ended December 31, 1998 First quarter................................................................. 35.67 27.83 0.140 Second quarter................................................................ 38.33 29.83 0.140 Third quarter................................................................. 34.33 23.88 0.140 Fourth quarter................................................................ 35.25 24.67 0.190 Year ended December 31, 1999 First quarter (through February 4, 1999)...................................... 37.88 32.00 --
- --------- (1) The prices and dividends in this table have been adjusted to reflect the December 1998 3-for-1 stock split. A recent reported last sale price for our common stock as reported on the Nasdaq National Market is set forth on the cover page of this prospectus. On January 29, 1999, there were approximately 2,271 holders of record of our common stock. On November 18, 1998, our Board of Directors approved a 36% increase in our quarterly common stock dividend for the fourth quarter of 1998 from $0.14 per share to $0.19 per share. Future dividends will depend upon our earnings, financial condition, capital requirements and other factors as our Board of Directors may deem relevant. 19 CAPITALIZATION The following table presents our short-term debt and total capitalization on a consolidated basis at September 30, 1998. The "As Adjusted for The Transactions" column presents our capitalization at September 30, 1998, as if this offering, the offering of the trust preferred securities and the repurchase of shares of our common stock from The Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi and Meiji Life Insurance Company had already occurred. We have assumed that UnionBanCal Corporation repurchases 9,545,462 shares of its common stock at a price of $34 11/16, less underwriting discounts and commissions of 3.2%. In addition, we assume that these repurchases are financed through a $350 million offering of trust preferred securities with an assumed interest rate of 8%. We have also assumed that the expenses will be amortized over a 5-year period and the excess proceeds will be used to pay UnionBanCal's expenses and reduce liabilities which are costing 5%. We assume an effective tax rate of 35%.
SEPTEMBER 30, 1998 ------------------------------- AS ADJUSTED FOR ACTUAL THE TRANSACTIONS ------------- ---------------- (UNAUDITED) (IN THOUSANDS) Short-term debt: Federal funds purchased and securities sold under repurchase agreements........ $ 1,574,163 $ 1,574,163 Commercial paper............................................................... 1,417,077 1,417,077 Other borrowed funds........................................................... 339,340 339,340 ------------- ---------------- Total short-term debt...................................................... $ 3,330,580 $ 3,330,580 ------------- ---------------- ------------- ---------------- Long-term debt: UnionBanCal Corporation-obligated mandatorily redeemable preferred securities of subsidiary grantor trust(1)................................................ $ -- $ 350,000 Subordinated capital notes..................................................... 298,000 298,000 ------------- ---------------- Total long-term debt....................................................... 298,000 648,000 ------------- ---------------- Shareholders' equity: Preferred stock, 5,000,000 shares authorized, none outstanding................. -- -- Common stock, 300,000,000 shares authorized, 175,208,037 shares outstanding, 165,726,774 as adjusted....................................................... 292,013 276,104 Additional paid-in capital..................................................... 1,430,539 1,125,936 Retained earnings.............................................................. 1,233,068 1,222,145 Accumulated other comprehensive income......................................... 29,330 29,330 ------------- ---------------- Total shareholders' equity................................................. 2,984,950 2,653,514 ------------- ---------------- Total capitalization..................................................... $ 3,282,950 $ 3,301,514 ------------- ---------------- ------------- ---------------- Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio.................................................. 9.53% 9.59% Total risk-based capital ratio................................................... 11.51 11.57 Return on average common equity.................................................. 16.87 18.29
- --------- (1) The sole asset of the subsidiary trust is the $ aggregate principal amount of the junior subordinated debentures. 20 SELECTED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL AND OPERATING DATA The selected financial and other data as of December 31, 1996 and 1997 and September 30, 1998 and for the years ended December 31, 1995, 1996 and 1997 and for the nine-month period ended September 30, 1998 are calculated from our audited consolidated financial statements included in this prospectus. The selected financial and other data for the year ending December 31, 1994 and as of December 31, 1995 are calculated from our audited consolidated financial statements that are not included in this prospectus. The selected financial and other data as of December 31, 1993 and 1994 and for the year ended December 31, 1993 are calculated from the combined historical financial information of Union Bank and BanCal Tri-State Corporation and its banking subsidiary, The Bank of California, N.A. Such combined historical information was, in turn, calculated from the separate audited consolidated financial statements of Union Bank and BanCal Tri-State for those periods that are not included in this prospectus. The selected financial and other data as of September 30, 1997 and for the nine-month period ended September 30, 1997 are calculated from our unaudited consolidated financial statements included in this prospectus, which, in the opinion of our management, include all adjustments necessary for a fair presentation of our financial position at such date and the results of operations for such interim period. The results for the nine-month period ended September 30, 1998 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected of the full fiscal year. We have presented all historical financial information as if the combination of Union Bank with BanCal Tri-State Corporation and its banking subsidiary, The Bank of California, N.A., which occurred on April 1, 1996, had been in effect for all periods presented. You should read the following data with the more detailed information contained in "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" and our consolidated financial statements and the notes to the consolidated financial statements, each included in this prospectus. You should read the following information with the data in the table on the next page: - We have presented net interest income and income before income taxes on a taxable-equivalent basis using the federal statutory tax rate of 35 percent. - We have annualized return on average assets, return on average common equity, net interest margin and net loans charged off to average total loans for the nine-month periods. - The Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio is computed by dividing Tier 1 capital, which is total shareholders' equity less net unrealized gains and losses on securities available for sale and intangible assets, by risk weighted period-end assets. Risk weighted period-end assets is the balance at risk less the portion of the allowance for credit losses which exceeds 1.25% of the balance at risk. The balance at risk is calculated by applying risk weight percentages per regulatory guidelines to total assets and off-balance sheet items. - The total risk-based capital ratio is total capital, which includes Tier 1 capital, subordinated debt, and 1.25% of the balance at risk, divided by risk weighted period-end assets. 21
NINE MONTHS ENDED YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, SEPTEMBER 30 ---------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------- 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1997 1998 ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- (DOLLARS IN MILLIONS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA) RESULTS OF OPERATIONS: Net interest income................... $ 986 $ 1,008 $ 1,153 $ 1,175 $ 1,237 $ 917 $ 983 Provision for credit losses........... 151 73 53 40 -- -- 45 Noninterest income.................... 406 360 395 419 463 343 400 Noninterest expense(1)................ 1,055 1,037 978 1,135 1,045 762 836 ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- Income before income taxes and cumulative effect of accounting change............................... 186 258 517 419 655 498 502 Taxable-equivalent adjustment......... 15 13 11 7 5 4 4 Income tax expense.................... 64 120 193 163 239 175 146 ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- Income before cumulative effect of accounting change.................... 107 125 313 249 411 319 352 Cumulative effect of accounting change(2)............................. 193 -- -- -- -- -- -- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- Net income............................ $ 300 $ 125 $ 313 $ 249 $ 411 $ 319 $ 352 ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- NET INCOME APPLICABLE TO COMMON STOCK... $ 289 $ 114 $ 302 $ 238 $ 404 $ 311 $ 352 ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- PER COMMON SHARE:(3) Net income -- basic................... $ 1.73 $ 0.67 $ 1.74 $ 1.37 $ 2.31 $ 1.78 $ 2.01 Net income -- diluted................. 1.73 0.67 1.73 1.36 2.30 1.78 2.01 Pro forma earnings -- basic, excluding after tax merger and integration expense and cumulative effect of accounting change(1)................. 0.58 0.67 1.74 1.78 2.33 1.80 2.01 Pro forma earnings -- diluted, excluding after tax merger and integration expense and cumulative effect of accounting change(1)....... 0.58 0.67 1.73 1.77 2.32 1.80 2.01 Dividends(4).......................... 0.47 0.47 0.47 0.47 0.51 0.37 0.42 Book value (end of period)............ 11.64 11.88 13.49 13.53 15.32 14.96 17.04 Common shares outstanding (end of period, in thousands)................ 169,990 172,044 174,180 174,458 174,918 174,848 175,208 Weighted average common shares outstanding -- basic (in thousands).. 166,857 171,089 173,806 174,391 174,683 174,615 175,091 Weighted average common shares outstanding -- diluted (in thousands)....................... 166,917 171,150 174,099 174,784 175,189 175,071 175,729 BALANCE SHEET DATA (END OF PERIOD): Total assets.......................... $ 24,006 $ 24,569 $ 27,547 $ 29,234 $ 30,585 $ 30,982 $ 31,407 Total loans........................... 17,759 18,066 20,432 21,050 22,741 22,298 23,498 Nonperforming assets.................. 1,193 421 247 157 130 133 81 Total deposits........................ 16,978 17,410 19,655 21,533 23,296 22,974 23,663 Subordinated capital notes............ 726 656 501 382 348 382 298 Preferred stock....................... 135 135 135 135 -- -- -- Common equity......................... 1,978 2,044 2,349 2,360 2,679 2,615 2,985 BALANCE SHEET DATA (PERIOD AVERAGE): Total assets.......................... $ 23,927 $ 23,693 $ 25,565 $ 27,900 $ 29,693 $ 29,452 $ 30,131 Total loans........................... 18,219 17,616 18,975 20,728 21,856 21,693 22,917 Earning assets........................ 21,176 21,047 22,849 24,717 26,292 26,066 27,003 Total deposits........................ 17,160 16,826 17,970 20,102 22,067 21,824 22,386 Common equity......................... 1,918 1,981 2,197 2,325 2,515 2,470 2,793
22
NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 30 ------------------------------------------------------------------ ----------- 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1997 -------------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- OTHER DATA: Return on average assets.............. 1.26% 0.53% 1.22% 0.89% 1.39% 1.45% Pro forma return on average assets, excluding after-tax merger and integration expense and cumulative effect of accounting change(1)...... 0.45 0.53 1.22 1.15 1.40 1.46 Return on average common equity...... 15.08 5.76 13.73 10.24 16.05 16.85 Pro forma return on average common equity, excluding after-tax merger and integration expense and cumulative effect of accounting change(1)........................... 5.03 5.76 13.73 13.33 16.20 17.04 Efficiency ratio(5).................. 66.92 70.39 63.39 71.02 61.53 60.55 Pro forma efficiency ratio, excluding merger and integration expense(1)(5)....................... 66.92 70.39 63.39 63.65 61.17 60.07 Net interest margin.................. 4.66 4.79 5.05 4.75 4.70 4.70 Dividend payout ratio................ 27.17 70.15 27.01 34.31 22.08 20.79 Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio...... 8.88 9.24 9.35 9.08 8.96 8.92 Total risk-based capital ratio....... 12.07 12.03 11.70 11.17 11.05 11.02 Leverage ratio....................... 8.26 8.67 8.70 8.41 8.53 8.39 Allowances for credit losses to total loans............................... 3.90 3.12 2.72 2.49 1.99 2.15 Allowance for credit losses to nonaccrual loans.................... 84.82 161.08 266.56 408.48 413.12 435.92 Net loans charged off to average total loans......................... 1.37 1.15 0.32 0.34 0.33 0.28 Nonperforming assets to total loans and foreclosed assets............... 6.58 2.32 1.21 0.74 0.57 0.60 Nonperforming assets to total assets............................... 4.97 1.71 0.90 0.54 0.42 0.43 1998 ----------- OTHER DATA: Return on average assets.............. 1.56% Pro forma return on average assets, excluding after-tax merger and integration expense and cumulative effect of accounting change(1)...... 1.56 Return on average common equity...... 16.87 Pro forma return on average common equity, excluding after-tax merger and integration expense and cumulative effect of accounting change(1)........................... 16.87 Efficiency ratio(5).................. 60.51 Pro forma efficiency ratio, excluding merger and integration expense(1)(5)....................... 60.51 Net interest margin.................. 4.86 Dividend payout ratio................ 20.90 Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio...... 9.53 Total risk-based capital ratio....... 11.51 Leverage ratio....................... 9.37 Allowances for credit losses to total loans............................... 2.02 Allowance for credit losses to nonaccrual loans.................... 697.19 Net loans charged off to average total loans......................... 0.12 Nonperforming assets to total loans and foreclosed assets............... 0.35 Nonperforming assets to total assets............................... 0.26
- ---------- (1) Merger and integration expense included in noninterest expense was $117 million for 1996 and $6 million for 1997, and after-tax merger and integration expense was $72 million for 1996 and $4 million for 1997. Merger and integration expense was $6 million ($4 million after-tax) for the nine months ended September 30, 1997. "Pro forma" means that the amounts presented do not include the effects of the cumulative change in accounting and merger and integration expense for the period presented. See "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations -- Year Ended December 31, 1997 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 1996" for a description of merger accounting and pro forma presentations. (2) 1993 net income includes the cumulative effect of the adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 109, "Accounting for Income Taxes." (3) Amounts have been restated to give retroactive effect to the December 1998 3-for-1 stock split. (4) Dividends per share reflect dividends declared on our common stock outstanding as of the declaration date. Amounts prior to the merger on April 1, 1996 are based on Union Bank only and do not include the dividend of $145 million paid to The Mitsubishi Bank, Limited in the first quarter of 1996 by BanCal Tri-State Corporation and The Bank of California, N.A. (5) The efficiency ratio is noninterest expense, excluding foreclosed asset expense (income), as a percentage of net interest income (taxable-equivalent) and noninterest income. Foreclosed asset expense (income) was $123.3 million for the year ended 1993, $73.7 million for the year ended 1994, $(3.2) million for the year ended 1995, $2.9 million for the year ended 1996 and $(1.3) million for the year ended 1997. For the nine months ended September 30, 1997 and 1998, foreclosed asset expense (income) was $(0.7) million in each period. 23 MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS YOU SHOULD READ THE FOLLOWING DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF OUR FINANCIAL CONDITION AND THE RESULTS OF OUR OPERATIONS TOGETHER WITH OUR FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND THE NOTES TO THOSE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS INCLUDED IN THIS PROSPECTUS. AMOUNTS FOR PRIOR PERIODS HAVE BEEN RECLASSIFIED TO CONFORM TO CURRENT FINANCIAL STATEMENT PRESENTATION AS INDICATED BELOW. INTRODUCTION We are a California-based commercial bank holding company with consolidated assets of $31.4 billion at September 30, 1998. Based on total assets, UnionBanCal Corporation, together with its consolidated subsidiaries, was the third largest bank holding company in California and among the 30 largest in the United States. At September 30, 1998, we operated 244 full-service branches in California, six banking offices in Oregon and Washington, and 18 overseas facilities. The combination of Union Bank with BanCal Tri-State Corporation and its banking subsidiary, The Bank of California, N.A., was completed on April 1, 1996 (the "Merger"), resulting in UnionBanCal Corporation and its banking subsidiary, Union Bank of California, N.A. The combination was accounted for as a reorganization of entities under common control, similar to a pooling of interests. Accordingly, all historical financial information has been restated as if the combination had been in effect for all periods presented. On August 10, 1998, UnionBanCal Corporation and its consolidated subsidiaries exchanged 10.2 million shares of its common stock for the 7.2 million shares of the common stock of Union Bank of California, N.A. owned directly by The Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi, Ltd. This share exchange provided UnionBanCal Corporation with a 100 percent ownership interest in Union Bank of California, N.A. In addition, it increased The Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi's ownership percentage of UnionBanCal Corporation to 82 percent from 81 percent. The exchange of shares was accounted for as a reorganization of entities under common control. Accordingly, amounts previously reported as "Parent Direct Interest in Bank Subsidiary," including the proportionate share of net income, dividends, and other comprehensive income, have been reclassified to combine them with the corresponding amounts attributable to our common shareholders for all periods presented. On November 18, 1998, our Board of Directors approved the declaration of a 3-for-1 stock split effective for shareholders of record on December 7, 1998. Accordingly, all historical financial information has been restated as if the stock split had been in effect for all periods presented. NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1998 COMPARED TO NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 SUMMARY Net income for the first nine months of 1998 was $352.4 million, compared to $318.9 million for the first nine months of 1997. Net income applicable to common stock was $352.4 million, or $2.01 per diluted common share, for the first nine months of 1998, compared with $311.3 million, or $1.78 per diluted common share, for the first nine months of 1997. Excluding the tax benefit of $52.4 million, net of federal tax, recorded in the first nine months of 1998, net income applicable to common stock was $299.9 million, or $1.71 per diluted common share. Excluding the $24.7 million tax refund for the first nine months of 1997, net income applicable to common stock was $286.6 million, or $1.64 per diluted common share. Other highlights of the first nine months of 1998 include: - Net interest income, on a taxable-equivalent basis, was $983.1 million for the first nine months of 1998, a $65.6 million, or 7 percent, increase from the comparable period one year earlier. The 24 increase in net interest income was primarily due to a 16 basis point increase in the net interest margin and a $936.6 million, or 4 percent, increase in average earning assets, resulting primarily from a $1.2 billion, or 6 percent, increase in average loans, largely funded by a $1.1 billion, or 15 percent, increase in average noninterest bearing deposits. - A provision for credit losses of $45.0 million was recorded for the first nine months of 1998, compared with no provision in 1997. Net charge-offs for the nine months ended September 30, 1998 were $21.0 million. This resulted from management's regular quarterly assessments of overall credit quality, loan growth and economic conditions in relation to the level of the allowance for credit losses. - Noninterest income was $399.9 million, an increase of $57.3 million, or 17 percent, over the first nine months of 1997. This increase includes the $17.1 million gain from the sale of the credit card portfolio in the second quarter of 1998. Service charges on deposit accounts grew $16.6 million, or 20 percent, reflecting growth in average deposits; trust and investment management fees increased $12.1 million, or 16 percent, on growth in assets under management; international commissions and fees increased $4.9 million; and securities gains, net increased $3.5 million, primarily from the sale of securities available for sale. - Noninterest expense was $836.2 million for the first nine months of 1998, compared with $762.2 million for the first nine months of 1997, an increase of $74.0 million, or 10 percent. Personnel-related expense increased $40.6 million, or 10 percent, primarily due to increases in salaries, a portion of which relates to increases in staffing, performance-based incentive compensation as well as a decline in the fair value of assets underlying postretirement benefit plans, caused by the downturn in the financial markets. Professional fees increased $6.1 million, or 32 percent, primarily due to additional costs related to the year 2000 effort. Other noninterest expense increased $24.4 million, or 22 percent, primarily attributable to additional expenses incurred to support higher deposit volumes. - The effective tax rate for the first nine months of 1998 was 29 percent, compared with 35 percent for the first nine months of 1997. The lower effective tax rate for the first nine months of 1998 was the result of a total reduction of $52.4 million, net of federal tax, in state income tax liabilities. Excluding this state tax reduction, the effective tax rate for the first nine months of 1998 was 40 percent. Excluding the $24.7 million after-tax refund from the State of California Franchise Tax Board, the effective tax rate for the first nine months of 1997 was 40 percent. - The return on average assets for the first nine months of 1998 increased to 1.56 percent, compared to 1.45 percent for the first nine months of 1997. The return on average common equity increased slightly to 16.87 percent for the first nine months of 1998, compared to 16.85 percent for the first nine months of 1997. - Total loans at September 30, 1998 increased $756.4 million, or 3 percent, over December 31, 1997, primarily due to growth in the commercial, financial and industrial portfolio. - Our Tier 1 and total risk-based capital ratios were 9.53 percent and 11.51 percent at September 30, 1998, compared with 8.96 percent and 11.05 percent at December 31, 1997. Our September 30, 1998 leverage ratio was 9.37 percent, compared with 8.53 percent at December 31, 1997. 25 NET INTEREST INCOME
FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 SEPTEMBER 30, 1998 -------------------------------------- -------------------------------------- INTEREST AVERAGE INTEREST AVERAGE AVERAGE INCOME/ YIELD/ AVERAGE INCOME/ YIELD/ BALANCE EXPENSE(1) RATE(1) BALANCE EXPENSE(1) RATE(1) ------------ ----------- ----------- ------------ ----------- ----------- (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) ASSETS: Loans:(2) Domestic............................ $ 20,218,298 $ 1,245,658 8.23% $ 21,569,891 $ 1,297,483 8.04% Foreign(3).......................... 1,475,031 66,578 6.03 1,347,101 68,380 6.79 Securities -- taxable(4).............. 2,476,970 116,715 6.29 2,949,151 139,720 6.32 Securities -- tax-exempt(4)........... 126,634 9,567 10.07 106,783 8,348 10.42 Interest bearing deposits in banks.... 996,710 43,404 5.82 279,938 14,187 6.78 Federal funds sold and securities purchased under resale agreements.... 450,603 18,727 5.56 281,565 11,784 5.60 Trading account assets................ 322,028 13,389 5.56 468,450 20,137 5.75 ------------ ----------- ------------ ----------- Total earning assets.............. 26,066,274 1,514,038 7.76 27,002,879 1,560,039 7.72 ------------ ----------- ------------ ----------- Allowance for credit losses........... (514,043) (471,384) Cash and due from banks............... 2,005,177 1,903,155 Premises and equipment, net........... 413,024 402,197 Other assets.......................... 1,481,296 1,294,046 ------------ ------------ Total assets...................... $ 29,451,728 $ 30,130,893 ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ LIABILITIES: Domestic deposits: Interest bearing.................... $ 5,274,137 $ 111,457 2.83% $ 5,447,712 $ 115,626 2.84% Savings and consumer time........... 2,956,493 83,695 3.78 3,176,898 90,713 3.82 Large time............................ 4,691,506 191,547 5.46 3,606,182 146,945 5.45 Foreign deposits(3)................... 1,560,149 55,156 4.73 1,723,282 66,454 5.16 ------------ ----------- ------------ ----------- Total interest bearing deposits... 14,482,285 441,855 4.08 13,954,074 419,738 4.02 ------------ ----------- ------------ ----------- Federal funds purchased and securities sold under repurchase agreements..... 1,106,180 44,053 5.32 1,481,809 59,667 5.38 Subordinated capital notes............ 353,429 17,180 6.50 335,179 15,883 6.34 Commercial paper...................... 1,631,056 66,543 5.45 1,641,425 67,720 5.52 Other borrowed funds.................. 673,359 26,999 5.36 323,082 13,975 5.78 ------------ ----------- ------------ ----------- Total borrowed funds.............. 3,764,024 154,775 5.50 3,781,495 157,245 5.56 ------------ ----------- ------------ ----------- Total interest bearing liabilities...................... 18,246,309 596,630 4.37 17,735,569 576,983 4.35 ----------- ----------- Noninterest bearing deposits.......... 7,341,239 8,432,086 Other liabilities..................... 1,274,000 1,170,511 ------------ ------------ Total liabilities................. $ 26,861,548 $ 27,338,166 ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY: Preferred stock....................... 120,659 -- Common equity......................... 2,469,521 2,792,727 ------------ ------------ Total shareholders' equity........ 2,590,180 2,792,727 ------------ ------------ Total liabilities and shareholders' equity............. $ 29,451,728 $ 30,130,893 ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ Net interest income/margin (taxable- equivalent basis).................... 917,408 4.70% 983,056 4.86% Less: taxable-equivalent adjustment... 4,107 3,417 ----------- ----------- Net interest income............... $ 913,301 $ 979,639 ----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
- ---------- (1) Yields and interest income are presented on a taxable-equivalent basis using the federal statutory tax rate of 35 percent. (2) Average balances on loans outstanding include all nonperforming and renegotiated loans. The amortized portion of net loan origination fees (costs) is included in interest income on loans, representing an adjustment to the yield. (3) Foreign loans and deposits are those loans and deposits originated in foreign branches. (4) Yields on securities available for sale are based on fair value. The difference between these yields and those based on amortized cost was not significant. 26 Net interest income is interest earned on loans and investments less interest expense on deposit accounts and borrowings. Primary factors affecting the level of net interest income include the margin between the yield earned on interest earning assets and the rate paid on interest bearing liabilities, as well as the volume and composition of average interest earning assets and average interest bearing liabilities. For the first nine months of 1998, net interest income, on a taxable equivalent basis, was $983.1 million, compared with $917.4 million in the comparable period one year earlier. The increase of $65.6 million, or 7 percent, was primarily attributable to a $936.6 million, or 4 percent, increase in average earning assets largely funded by a $1.1 billion, or 15 percent, increase in average noninterest bearing deposits. In addition, the net interest margin increased 16 basis points to 4.86 percent. Although the differential between the decrease in the yield on average earning assets and the decrease in the rate of average interest bearing liabilities was a negative 2 basis points, the negative impact on the net interest margin of these two factors was more than offset by the increase in the proportion of funding provided by average noninterest bearing deposits. Average earning assets were $26.1 billion for the nine months ended September 30, 1997 and $27.0 billion for the nine months ended September 30, 1998. Most of this increase was attributable to growth in average loans, which increased $1.2 billion, or 6 percent, and average securities, which were $452.3 million, or 17 percent, higher. This increase was partially offset by a $716.8 million decrease in average interest bearing deposits in banks. The growth in average loans outstanding was attributable to the increase in average commercial, financial and industrial loans of $1.5 billion, partly offset by the decrease in average consumer loans of $337.4 million, which was primarily related to the sale of the credit card portfolio. See "Loans" on page 30 for additional commentary on growth in the loan portfolio. The increase in primarily fixed rate securities reflected interest rate risk management actions to reduce our exposure to declines in interest rates. NONINTEREST INCOME
FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, ---------------------- PERCENT 1997 1998 CHANGE ---------- ---------- --------- (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) Service charges on deposit accounts.................................... $ 84,699 $ 101,288 19.59% Trust and investment management fees................................... 76,737 88,806 15.73 International commissions and fees..................................... 49,593 54,516 9.93 Merchant transaction processing fees................................... 42,653 42,988 0.79 Merchant banking fees.................................................. 19,899 24,083 21.03 Brokerage commissions and fees......................................... 11,529 14,188 23.06 Foreign exchange trading gains, net.................................... 11,249 14,159 25.87 Securities gains, net.................................................. 2,098 5,579 165.92 Gain on sale of credit card portfolio.................................. -- 17,056 nm Other.................................................................. 44,170 37,286 (15.59) ---------- ---------- Total noninterest income............................................. $ 342,627 $ 399,949 16.73% ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
- --------- nm = not meaningful For the first nine months of 1997, noninterest income was $342.6 million, compared with $399.9 million for the same period in 1998. This increase of $57.3 million, or 17 percent, includes the second quarter 1998 gain of $17.1 million from the sale of the credit card portfolio, a $16.6 million increase in service charges on deposit accounts, reflecting a 3 percent increase in average deposits coupled with the expansion of several products and services, a $12.1 million increase in trust and investment management fees, largely due to growth of assets under management, a $4.9 million increase in international commissions and fees, a $3.5 million increase in securities gains, net, and a $6.8 million increase related to brokerage commissions and merchant banking fees. In contrast, other noninterest income decreased $6.9 million, or 16 percent, due to a 27 $7.7 million nonrecurring gain recognized in 1997 related to a real estate joint venture and the $2.9 million trading loss in 1998, partially offset by the $4.8 million gain recognized in the second quarter of 1998 from the sale of commercial real estate loans. NONINTEREST EXPENSE
FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, ---------------------- PERCENT 1997 1998 CHANGE ---------- ---------- ----------- (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) Salaries and other compensation........................................ $ 337,401 $ 369,715 9.58% Employee benefits...................................................... 81,569 89,877 10.19 ---------- ---------- Personnel-related expense............................................ 418,970 459,592 9.70 Net occupancy.......................................................... 64,133 67,294 4.93 Equipment.............................................................. 41,206 41,842 1.54 Merchant transaction processing........................................ 31,269 33,008 5.56 Communications......................................................... 31,135 31,515 1.22 Professional services.................................................. 19,062 25,186 32.13 Advertising and public relations....................................... 20,759 22,419 8.00 Data processing........................................................ 19,115 20,462 7.05 Printing and office supplies........................................... 17,646 19,112 8.31 Software............................................................... 12,358 14,536 17.62 Travel................................................................. 11,321 13,041 15.19 Intangible asset amortization.......................................... 10,014 10,069 0.55 Armored car............................................................ 9,160 8,989 (1.87) Foreclosed asset expense (income)...................................... (696) (746) nm Merger and integration expense......................................... 6,037 -- nm Other.................................................................. 50,719 69,859 37.74 ---------- ---------- Total noninterest expense............................................ $ 762,208 $ 836,178 9.70% ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
- --------- nm = not meaningful Noninterest expense was $762.2 million for the first nine months of 1997, compared with $836.2 million for the first nine months of 1998, an increase of $74.0 million, or 10 percent. Personnel-related expense increased $40.6 million, or 10 percent, primarily due to a $16.7 million increase in performance-based incentive compensation, a 4 percent increase in the workforce, to support increased revenue growth, and a $4.8 million increase in benefits expense arising from a loss in the fair value of assets underlying postretirement benefit plans. Professional services increased $6.1 million, or 32 percent, due to additional costs related to the year 2000 effort. In addition, other noninterest expense increased $19.1 million, primarily attributable to additional expenses incurred to support higher deposit volumes. We continue to make preparations for the year 2000. For a detailed discussion of our year 2000 program, see "Year 2000" on page 70. The total cost of our year 2000 project is estimated to be approximately $50 million, of which $10 million relates to capital expenditures which we will capitalize and depreciate over their useful lives. The remaining $40 million will be included in noninterest expense in the period incurred. As of September 30, 1998, we spent $19 million on our year 2000 project, $2 million in 1997 and $17 million in 1998. Of the $19 million spent, as of September 30, 1998, $6 million relates to capital expenditures, $1 million in 1997 and $5 million in 1998. Of the estimated $31 million remaining to be spent, an estimated $4 million is for capital expenditures. The cost of the year 2000 project is being funded by normal operating cash and staffed by external resources as well as internal staff re-deployed from less time-sensitive assignments. Estimated total cost could change further as analysis continues. 28 The combination of Union Bank and BanCal Tri-State Corporation on April 1, 1996 resulted in the recording of a total of $123.5 million in merger and integration expense. The remaining liability balance at September 30, 1998 was $10.6 million. The balance includes amounts primarily for lease payments that are continuing over the expected term of the leases. Merger and integration expense of $6.0 million was recorded for the first nine months of 1997, compared with none for the first nine months of 1998. INCOME TAX EXPENSE The effective tax rate for the nine months ended September 30, 1997 was reduced as a result of an after-tax refund from the State of California Franchise Tax Board of $24.7 million in settlement of litigation, administration and audit disputes covering the years 1975-1987. The effective tax rate for the nine months ended September 30, 1997 was 35 percent. The effective tax rate for the nine months ended September 30, 1998 was 29 percent. The decrease in the effective tax rate for 1998 was the result of a reduction of California franchise taxes for 1997 and 1998 from our ability to file California franchise tax returns on a worldwide unitary basis, which incorporates the financial results of The Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi and its worldwide affiliates. The total reduction of $52.4 million, net of federal tax, was reflected in the third quarter of 1998. Of this amount, $29 million related to the reversal of previously accrued 1997 state income tax liabilities and $23.4 million related to a lower state tax provision in 1998. Excluding these reductions, the effective tax rates for all periods would have been 40 percent. At this time, we anticipate that we will continue to file our California franchise tax return on the worldwide basis for 1999. Our anticipated 1999 tax rate will be dependent on our proportionate share of The Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi financial results for that year, and is expected to be within the range of 35 to 40 percent. 29 LOANS The following table shows loans outstanding by loan type.
PERCENT CHANGE TO SEPTEMBER 30, 1998 FROM: --------------------------- SEPTEMBER 30, DECEMBER 31, SEPTEMBER 30, SEPTEMBER 30, DECEMBER 31, 1997 1997 1998 1997 1997 ------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- ------------ (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) Domestic: Commercial, financial and industrial......................... $ 10,405,299 $ 10,747,179 $ 12,151,210 16.78% 13.06% Construction........................ 312,318 293,333 420,267 34.56 43.27 Mortgage: Residential....................... 2,966,326 2,961,233 2,742,451 (7.55) (7.39) Commercial........................ 2,851,838 2,951,807 2,980,371 4.51 0.97 ------------- ------------- ------------- Total mortgage.................. 5,818,164 5,913,040 5,722,822 (1.64) (3.22) Consumer: Installment....................... 2,075,065 2,090,752 2,026,441 (2.34) (3.08) Home equity....................... 1,027,147 992,916 844,256 (17.81) (14.97) Credit card and other lines of credit........................... 275,258 270,097 -- nm nm ------------- ------------- ------------- Total consumer.................. 3,377,470 3,353,765 2,870,697 (15.00) (14.40) Lease financing..................... 863,745 874,860 1,013,772 17.37 15.88 ------------- ------------- ------------- Total loans in domestic offices........................ 20,776,996 21,182,177 22,178,768 6.75 4.70 Loans originated in foreign branches............................ 1,520,728 1,559,231 1,319,077 (13.26) (15.40) ------------- ------------- ------------- Total loans..................... $ 22,297,724 $ 22,741,408 $ 23,497,845 5.38% 3.33% ------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- -------------
- --------- nm = not meaningful Our lending activities are predominantly domestic, with such loans and leases comprising 94 percent of the portfolio at September 30, 1998. Total loans at September 30, 1998 were $23.5 billion, an increase of $756.4 million, or 3 percent, from December 31, 1997. The increase was primarily attributable to growth in the commercial, financial and industrial loan portfolio, which increased $1.4 billion from December 31, 1997, partly offset by the consumer loan portfolio, which decreased $483.1 million. Commercial, financial and industrial loans represent the largest category in the loan portfolio. These loans are extended principally to major corporations, middle market businesses, and small businesses, with no industry concentration exceeding 10 percent of total commercial, financial and industrial loans. At year-end 1997, the commercial, financial and industrial loan portfolio was $10.7 billion, or 47 percent of total loans, and at September 30, 1998, it was $12.2 billion, or 52 percent of total loans. The increase of $1.4 billion, or 13 percent, from year-end 1997 was primarily attributable to continued growth in loans extended to large corporations. The construction loan portfolio totaled $293.3 million, or 1 percent of total loans, at December 31, 1997, compared with $420.3 million, or 2 percent of total loans, at September 30, 1998. This growth is primarily attributable to the favorable California real estate market coupled with the continuing improvement in the West Coast economy. Mortgage loans were $5.9 billion, or 26 percent of total loans, at December 31, 1997, compared with $5.7 billion, or 24 percent of total loans, at September 30, 1998. The mortgage loan portfolio consists of loans 30 on commercial and industrial projects and loans secured by one to four family residential properties, primarily in California. Despite the sale of $123.0 million in commercial real estate mortgages during the second quarter of 1998, commercial mortgage loans increased $28.6 million from December 31, 1997, primarily attributable to the favorable California real estate market coupled with the continuing improvement in the West Coast economy. Residential mortgage loans decreased $218.8 million due to prepayments arising from the favorable interest rate environment and to sales in the secondary market. Consumer loans totaled $3.4 billion, or 15 percent of total loans, at December 31, 1997, compared with $2.9 billion, or 12 percent of total loans, at September 30, 1998. The decrease of $483.1 million was attributable to the sale of the $253.0 million credit card loan portfolio in April 1998, and to a reduction in home equity loans as customers refinanced to take advantage of favorable long-term, fixed rate mortgages. Lease financing totaled $874.9 million, or 4 percent of total loans, at December 31, 1997, compared with $1 billion, or 4 percent of total loans, at September 30, 1998. Loans originated in foreign branches totaled $1.6 billion, or 7 percent of total loans, at December 31, 1997 and $1.3 billion, or 6 percent of total loans, at September 30, 1998. CROSS-BORDER OUTSTANDINGS Our cross-border outstandings reflect additional economic and political risks that are not reflected in domestic outstandings. These risks include those arising from exchange rate fluctuations and restrictions on the transfer of funds. The following table sets forth our cross-border outstandings as of September 30, 1997, December 31, 1997, and September 30, 1998, for each country where such outstandings exceeded 1 percent of total assets. The cross-border outstandings were compiled based upon category and domicile of ultimate risk and are comprised of balances with banks, trading account assets, securities available for sale, securities purchased under resale agreements, loans, accrued interest receivable, acceptances outstanding and investments with foreign entities. The amounts outstanding for each country exclude local currency outstandings. We do not have significant local currency outstandings to the individual countries listed in the following table that are not hedged or are not funded by local currency borrowings.
PUBLIC CORPORATIONS FINANCIAL SECTOR AND OTHER TOTAL INSTITUTIONS ENTITIES BORROWERS OUTSTANDINGS ------------- ----------- --------------- ------------- (DOLLARS IN MILLIONS) September 30, 1997 Japan....................................................... $ 939 $ -- $ 403 $ 1,342 Korea....................................................... 691 36 293 1,020 December 31, 1997 Japan....................................................... 401 -- 438 839 Korea....................................................... 561 10 257 828 Thailand.................................................... 320 -- -- 320 September 30, 1998 Japan....................................................... 115 -- 469 584 Korea....................................................... 376 -- 139 515
The economic condition and the ability of some countries, to which we have cross-border exposure, to manage their external debt obligations have been impacted by the Asian economic crisis which began in the second half of 1997. The impact of the Asian crisis appears to be spreading to other global markets. Our exposure in all affected countries continues to be short-term in nature and substantially related to the finance of trade. Although the extent of risk will vary from country to country, and institution to institution, these short-term exposures are characterized by management to be in the low to moderate range. 31 Cross-border exposures, other than those referred to in the table above, include total outstandings as of September 30, 1998 of $133 million in Brazil. Since Japan is the second largest trading nation in the world, its political, economic and financial markets situation is being closely monitored. The situation in Japan is worsening, and the depressed conditions in that country are impacting other areas which are highly dependent on trade relations with it. There is considerable concern that the United States is not immune to the effects of the depressed economic conditions in Japan and to the Asian crisis. Management is monitoring our portfolio accordingly. Although management cannot predict the ultimate impact of the global financial crisis on our financial position and results of operations since much depends on the effect of the stabilizing activities already under way, management believes that the continuation of internal supervision, monitoring and portfolio risk management practices will be effective in minimizing the impact over and above that already identified. Increases in nonaccrual loans, together with some related increases in charge-off activity, may occur as events unfold. PROVISION FOR CREDIT LOSSES During the third quarter of 1998, we recorded a $10.0 million provision for credit losses, bringing the total provision for credit losses recorded during the nine months ended September 30, 1998 to $45.0 million, compared with no provision for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 1997. Provisions for credit losses are charged to income to bring our allowance for credit losses to a level deemed appropriate by management based on the factors discussed under "--Allowance for Credit Losses" below. ALLOWANCE FOR CREDIT LOSSES We maintain an allowance for credit losses to absorb losses inherent in the loan and lease portfolio. The allowance is based on ongoing, quarterly assessments of the probable estimated losses inherent in the loan and lease portfolio, and to a lesser extent, unused commitments to provide financing. Our methodology for assessing the appropriateness of the allowance consists of several key elements, which include: - the formula allowance, - specific allowances for identified problem loans and portfolio segments - and the unallocated allowance. In addition, the allowance incorporates the results of measuring impaired loans as provided in: - Statement of Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 114, "Accounting by Creditors for Impairment of a Loan," and - SFAS No. 118, "Accounting by Creditors for Impairment of a Loan--Income Recognition and Disclosures." These accounting standards prescribe the measurement methods, income recognition and disclosures concerning impaired loans. The formula allowance is calculated by applying loss factors to outstanding loans and leases and certain unused commitments, in each case based on the internal risk grade of those loans, pools of loans, leases or commitments. Changes in risk grades of both performing and nonperforming loans affect the amount of the formula allowance. Loss factors are based on our historical loss experience and may be adjusted for significant factors that, in management's judgment, affect the collectibility of the portfolio as of the evaluation date. Loss factors are described as follows: 32 - Problem graded loan loss factors are obtained from a migration model that tracks four years of historical loss experience. We are exploring changes to the migration model to track historical loss experience over an eight-year period, which management believes approximates a business cycle. - Pass graded loan loss factors are based on the average annual net chargeoff rate over an eight-year period. - Pooled loan loss factors, not individually graded loans, are based on expected net chargeoffs for one year. Pooled loans are loans and leases that are homogeneous in nature, such as consumer installment and residential mortgage loans and automobile leases. Specific allowances are established where management has identified significant conditions or circumstances related to a credit that management believes indicate the probability that a loss has been incurred in excess of the amount determined by the application of the formula allowance. The unallocated allowance is composed of two elements. The first element, which is based on our credit policy, consists of an amount that is at least 20% to 25% of the formula allowance and the specific allowance. This element recognizes the model and estimation risk associated with the formula and specific allowances. The second element is based upon management's evaluation of various conditions, the effects of which are not directly measured in determining the formula and specific allowances. The evaluation of the inherent loss regarding these conditions involves a higher degree of uncertainty because they are not identified with specific problem credits or portfolio segments. The conditions evaluated in connection with the unallocated allowance include the following conditions that existed as of the balance sheet date: - then-existing general economic and business conditions affecting our key lending areas, - credit quality trends, including trends in nonperforming loans expected to result from existing conditions, - collateral values, - loan volumes and concentrations, - seasoning of the loan portfolio, - specific industry conditions within portfolio segments, - recent loss experience in particular segments of the portfolio, - duration of the current business cycle, - bank regulatory examination results and - findings of our internal credit examiners. Executive management reviews these conditions quarterly in discussion with our senior credit officers. If any of these conditions is evidenced by a specifically identifiable problem credit or portfolio segment as of the evaluation date, management's estimate of the effect of this condition may be reflected as a specific allowance applicable to this credit or portfolio segment. Where any of these conditions is not evidenced by a specifically identifiable problem credit or portfolio segment as of the evaluation date, management's evaluation of the probable loss concerning this condition is reflected in the unallocated allowance. The allowance for credit losses is based upon estimates of probable losses inherent in the loan and lease portfolio. The amount actually observed for these losses can vary significantly from the estimated amounts. Our methodology includes several features that are intended to reduce the differences between estimated and actual losses. The loss migration model that is used to establish the loan loss factors for problem graded loans is designed to be self-correcting by taking into account our recent loss experience. Similarly, by basing the pass graded loan loss factors on loss experience over the last eight years, the methodology is designed to take our recent loss experience into account. Pooled loan loss factors are adjusted quarterly based upon the 33 level of net chargeoffs expected by management in the next twelve months. Furthermore, our methodology permits adjustments to any loss factor used in the computation of the formula allowance in the event that, in management's judgment, significant factors that affect the collectibility of the portfolio as of the evaluation date are not reflected in the loss factors. By assessing the probable estimated losses inherent in the loan and lease portfolio on a quarterly basis, we are able to adjust specific and inherent loss estimates based upon any more recent information that has become available. At September 30, 1998, our allowance for credit losses was $473.7 million, or 2.02 percent of total loans, and 697.2 percent of total nonaccrual loans, compared with an allowance for credit losses at September 30, 1997 of $478.5 million, or 2.15 percent of total loans, and 435.9 percent of total nonaccrual loans. During the first nine months of 1998, there were no changes in estimation methods or assumptions that affected our methodology for assessing the appropriateness of the allowance for credit losses, except that we extended the average annual net chargeoff rate for pass graded loans from six years to eight years. The impact of this change resulted in an increase of approximately $17 million in the formula allowance. We extended the average annual net chargeoff rate to better reflect the business cycle. Changes in assumptions regarding the effects of economic and business conditions on borrowers and other factors, which are described below, affect the assessment of the unallocated allowance. As of March 31, 1998, we changed the method of determining the quantified losses on Asia/Pacific loans from one based on total corporate exposure in the segment to one based on total country exposure to countries receiving assistance from the International Monetary Fund. As of March 31, 1998, this change resulted in a $9 million decrease in the allowance allocated to foreign loans. In the third quarter 1998, we reclassified a $1.9 million previously established allowance for credit losses related to interest rate derivatives and foreign exchange contracts from the unallocated portion of the allowance for credit losses. The reserve for derivative and foreign exchange contracts is presented as an offset to trading account assets. Future changes in that reserve as a result of changes in the positive replacement cost of those contracts will be provided as an offset to trading gains and losses. We evaluate our loan portfolio for impairment as defined by SFAS No. 114, "Accounting by Creditors for Impairment of a Loan", as amended. At September 30, 1998, total impaired loans were $67.9 million and the associated impairment allowance was $7.5 million, compared with total impaired loans of $108.4 million and an associated impairment allowance of $9.4 million at December 31, 1997. We resumed recording provisions in 1998 to bring our allowance for credit losses to a level deemed appropriate by management based upon management's application of the loan loss allowance methodology discussed above. In particular, in the assessment as of September 30, 1998, management focused on factors affecting elements of the oil and gas, agriculture and technology industries, as well as the continued effects of the Asian financial turmoil on companies and financial institutions in domestic and foreign markets in which we operate and the growth in, and changes in the composition of, the loan and lease portfolio. - Regarding the oil and gas industry, where we had $529.0 million of loans outstanding at September 30, 1998, management considered the effects of the decline in oil prices on the cash flows of borrowers in the oil and gas industry. - Regarding the agriculture industry, where we had $531.4 million of loans outstanding at September 30, 1998, management considered the effects of abnormal weather conditions, commonly referred to as "El Nino", and export market conditions on agricultural borrowers. - Regarding the technology industry, where we had $834.2 million of loans outstanding at September 30, 1998, management considered the effects of export market conditions and cyclical overcapacity on borrowers in the technology industry. 34 - Regarding cross-border loans and acceptances to Japan, Korea, Malaysia, Thailand, Vietnam, Singapore, Indonesia, the Philippines, China, Taiwan and Hong Kong, where we had outstandings of $1.5 billion at September 30, 1998, management considered the continued effects of the global financial turmoil. - Regarding cross-border loans and acceptances to Latin American countries, where we had outstandings of $292 million at September 30, 1998, management considered the continued effects of the global financial turmoil. Although in some instances, the downgrading of a loan resulting from these effects has been reflected in the formula allowance, management believes that in most instances, the impact of these events on the collectibility of the applicable loans and leases has not yet been reflected in the level of nonperforming loans or in the internal risk grading process regarding these loans and leases. Accordingly, our evaluation of the probable losses related to these factors is reflected in the unallocated allowance. The evaluations of the inherent losses concerning these factors involve higher degrees of uncertainty because they are not identified with specific problem credits. At September 30, 1998, our allowance for credit losses was $473.7 million, consisting of a $196 million formula allowance, a $30 million specific allowance and a $247 million unallocated allowance. We do not weight the unallocated allowance among segments of the portfolio. The following factors are reflected in management's estimate of the unallocated allowance: - the approximately $45 million to $57 million margin for model and estimation risk prescribed by our credit policy, - the effects of the decline in oil prices on borrowers in the oil and gas industry, which could be in the range of $10 million to $20 million, - the effects of abnormal weather conditions and export market conditions on agricultural borrowers, which could be in the range of $10 million to $20 million, - the effects of export market conditions and cyclical overcapacity on borrowers in the technology industry, which could be in the range of $20 million to $30 million, - the continued effects of the global financial turmoil on borrowers in Asia/Pacific countries, which could be in the range of $65 million to $90 million and - the continued effects of the global financial turmoil on borrowers in Latin American countries, which could be in the range of $15 million to $20 million. There can be no assurance that the adverse impact of any of these conditions on us will not be in excess of the range set forth above. See "Forward Looking Statements" on page 14 for more information on risks and uncertainties affecting our estimates. Despite the foregoing factors, management reduced the size of the provision in each of the second and third quarters of 1998 based upon certain mitigating factors, including the continued decline in the level of nonperforming loans, the lower levels of net chargeoffs, the sale of the credit card portfolio, the real estate note sale and the results of our efforts to limit our exposure and counterparty risk in Asia. 35 The table below presents a reconciliation of changes in the allowance for credit losses.
FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, ---------------------- 1997 1998 ---------- ---------- (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) Balance, beginning of period............................................................ $ 523,946 $ 451,692 Loans charged off: Commercial, financial and industrial.................................................. 40,618 21,966 Construction.......................................................................... 120 3 Mortgage.............................................................................. 4,481 4,992 Consumer.............................................................................. 38,864 24,206 Lease financing....................................................................... 2,502 1,971 ---------- ---------- Total loans charged off............................................................. 86,585 53,138 Recoveries of loans previously charged off: Commercial, financial and industrial.................................................. 18,473 17,788 Construction.......................................................................... 9,054 3 Mortgage.............................................................................. 2,833 2,705 Consumer.............................................................................. 10,575 11,389 Lease financing....................................................................... 284 273 ---------- ---------- Total recoveries of loans previously charged off.................................... 41,219 32,158 ---------- ---------- Net loans charged off............................................................. 45,366 20,980 Provision for credit losses............................................................. -- 45,000 Transfer of reserve for trading account assets.......................................... -- (1,911) Foreign translation adjustment and other net additions (deductions)..................... (126) (84) ---------- ---------- Balance, end of period.................................................................. $ 478,454 $ 473,717 ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- Allowance for credit losses to total loans.............................................. 2.15% 2.02% Provision for credit losses to net loans charged off.................................... nm 214.49 Net loans charged off to average loans outstanding for the period(1).................... 0.28 0.12
- --------- (1) Annualized. nm = not meaningful During the third quarter of 1998, net loans charged off were $12.5 million, compared with $23.6 million in the third quarter of 1997. Loans charged off in the third quarter of 1998 decreased by $17.0 million, primarily due to a - $12.1 million decrease in commercial, financial and industrial loans charged off as portfolio quality improved, and - $7.7 million decrease in consumer loans charged off primarily due to the sale of the credit card portfolio in April of 1998. Recoveries of loans previously charged off decreased by $5.9 million, and the percentage of net loans charged off to average loans decreased from 0.42 percent in the third quarter of 1997 to 0.21 percent in the third quarter of 1998. Net loans charged off were $21.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 1998 and $45.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 1997. Loans charged off in 1998 decreased by $33.4 million primarily due to a - $18.7 million decrease in commercial, financial and industrial loans charged off as portfolio quality improved, and 36 - $14.7 million decrease in consumer loans charged off primarily due to the sale of the credit card portfolio in April of 1998. Recoveries of loans previously charged off decreased by $9.1 million, and the percentage of net loans charged off to average loans decreased from 0.28 percent for the nine months ended September 30, 1997 to 0.12 percent for the nine months ended September 30, 1998. Chargeoffs reflect the realization of losses in the portfolio that were recognized previously through provisions for credit losses. At September 30, 1998, the allowance for credit losses exceeded the net loans charged off during the first three quarters of 1998, reflecting management's belief, based on the foregoing analysis, that there are additional losses inherent in the portfolio. At September 30, 1998, our average annual net chargeoffs for the past five years and the nine months ended September 30, 1998, was $117.7 million, which represents 4.0 years of losses based on the level of the allowance for credit losses at that date. Historical net chargeoffs are not necessarily indicative of the amount of net chargeoffs that we will realize in the future. NONPERFORMING ASSETS
SEPTEMBER 30, DECEMBER 31, SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 1997 1998 ------------- ------------ ------------- (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) Commercial, financial and industrial................................. $ 54,087 $ 46,392 $ 55,407 Construction......................................................... 4,579 4,071 4,377 Mortgage: Residential........................................................ 1,133 954 -- Commercial......................................................... 49,959 57,921 8,163 ------------- ------------ ------------- Total mortgage................................................... 51,092 58,875 8,163 ------------- ------------ ------------- Total nonaccrual loans........................................... 109,758 109,338 67,947 Foreclosed assets.................................................... 23,216 20,471 13,452 ------------- ------------ ------------- Total nonperforming assets....................................... $ 132,974 $ 129,809 $ 81,399 ------------- ------------ ------------- ------------- ------------ ------------- Allowance for credit losses.......................................... $ 478,454 $ 451,692 $ 473,717 ------------- ------------ ------------- ------------- ------------ ------------- Nonaccrual loans to total loans...................................... 0.49% 0.48% 0.29% Allowance for credit losses to nonaccrual loans...................... 435.92 413.12 697.19 Nonperforming assets to total loans and foreclosed assets............ 0.60 0.57 0.35 Nonperforming assets to total assets................................. 0.43 0.42 0.26
At September 30, 1998, nonperforming assets totaled $81.4 million, a decrease of $48.4 million, or 37 percent, from December 31, 1997. The decrease was primarily the result of reductions of $49.8 million in nonaccrual commercial mortgage loans due to a combination of note sales, repayments and restorations to accrual and $7.0 million in foreclosed assets due to sales of individual assets. The decline in nonaccrual loans was reflected in an improvement in the overall risk grades of the portfolio, which contributed to a reduction in the formula allowance. Nonaccrual loans as a percentage of total loans were 0.29 percent at September 30, 1998, compared with 0.48 percent at December 31, 1997. Nonperforming assets as a percentage of total loans and foreclosed assets were 0.35 percent at September 30, 1998, compared with 0.57 percent at December 31, 1997. 37 LOANS 90 DAYS OR MORE PAST DUE AND STILL ACCRUING
SEPTEMBER 30, DECEMBER 31, SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 1997 1998 ------------- ------------ ------------- (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) Commercial, financial and industrial................................. $ 3,682 $ 450 $ 1,403 Mortgage: Residential........................................................ 9,606 10,170 9,223 Commercial......................................................... 2,284 1,660 370 ------------- ------------ ------------- Total mortgage................................................... 11,890 11,830 9,593 Consumer and other................................................... 10,010 7,712 4,299 ------------- ------------ ------------- Total loans 90 days or more past due and still accruing............ $ 25,582 $ 19,992 $ 15,295 ------------- ------------ ------------- ------------- ------------ -------------
REGULATORY CAPITAL The following table summarizes our risk-based capital, risk-weighted assets, and risk-based capital ratios.
MINIMUM SEPTEMBER 30, DECEMBER 31, SEPTEMBER 30, REGULATORY 1997 1997 1998 REQUIREMENT ------------- ------------- ------------- ----------------- (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) CAPITAL COMPONENTS: Tier 1 capital...................................... $ 2,520,589 $ 2,587,071 $ 2,876,605 Tier 2 capital...................................... 593,865 601,102 598,027 ------------- ------------- ------------- Total risk-based capital.......................... $ 3,114,454 $ 3,188,173 $ 3,474,632 ------------- ------------- ------------- Risk-weighted assets................................ $ 28,249,379 $ 28,862,340 $ 30,176,967 ------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- Quarterly average assets............................ $ 30,037,626 $ 30,334,507 $ 30,696,414 ------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- CAPITAL RATIOS: Total risk-based capital............................ 11.02% 11.05% 11.51% 8.0% Tier 1 risk-based capital........................... 8.92 8.96 9.53 4.0 Leverage ratio(1)................................... 8.39 8.53 9.37 4.0
- --------- (1) Tier 1 capital divided by quarterly average assets, excluding goodwill. UnionBanCal Corporation and its bank must comply with various regulations issued by Federal banking agencies, including minimum capital requirements. UnionBanCal Corporation and its bank are required to maintain minimum ratios of total and Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets and of Tier 1 capital to average assets, which is the leverage ratio. Compared with December 31, 1997, our Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio at September 30, 1998 increased 57 basis points to 9.53 percent, the total risk-based capital ratio increased 46 basis points to 11.51 percent, and the leverage ratio increased 84 basis points to 9.37 percent. The increase in the capital ratios was primarily attributable to retained earnings growing faster than both risk-weighted assets and average assets, partly offset by the reduction of $50.0 million in subordinated capital notes. As of September 30, 1998, management believes the capital ratios of our bank met all regulatory minimums of a "well-capitalized" institution. 38 YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1997 COMPARED TO YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996 To facilitate the discussion of the results of operations, the Selected Consolidated Financial and Operating Data table on page 21 includes pro forma earnings disclosures and ratios. These "pro forma" presentations supplement the Consolidated Statements of Income on page F-2, which are prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, primarily regarding the treatment of merger and integration expense. Pro forma means that the amounts presented do not include the effects of the cumulative change in accounting and merger and integration expense for the period presented. We believe that it is meaningful to understand the operating results and trends excluding these expenses and, therefore, have included information in the tables referred to above and in the discussion that follows, that presents income before merger and integration expense and income taxes and related pro forma ratio and per share calculations. SUMMARY Net income in 1997 was $411 million, including $4 million (after-tax) of merger and integration related expense. Net income in 1996 was $249 million, including $72 million (after-tax) of merger and integration related expense. Net income applicable to common stock was $404 million, or $2.30 per diluted common share, in 1997 compared with $238 million, or $1.36 per diluted common share, in 1996. Excluding after-tax merger and integration expense, pro forma earnings for 1997 were $415 million, an increase of 29 percent from $321 million a year earlier. Pro forma earnings applicable to common stock were $407 million, or $2.32 per diluted common share, in 1997 compared with $310 million, or $1.77 per diluted common share, in 1996. This increase of 31 percent over the comparable figures for 1996 was due to a 5 percent increase in net interest income, an 11 percent increase in noninterest income, a decrease in the effective income tax rate, and a $40 million reduction in the provision for credit losses, partially offset by a 2 percent increase in noninterest expense (excluding merger and integration expense). Other highlights for 1997 include: - Net interest income, on a taxable-equivalent basis, was $1,237 million in 1997, an increase of $62 million, or 5 percent, over 1996 primarily due to a $1.6 billion, or 6 percent, increase in average earning assets, resulting primarily from a $1.1 billion, or 5 percent, increase in average loans and largely funded by an $851 million, or 13 percent, increase in average demand deposits. Partially offsetting the positive impact of the growth in earning assets and demand deposits on net interest income was a 5 basis point decline in the net interest margin to 4.70%. The decline in net interest margin was primarily due to a 14 basis point decrease in the spread between the average yield on earning assets and the average rate paid on interest bearing liabilities. - No provision for credit losses was recorded in 1997 compared with $40 million in 1996, reflecting improvement in the quality of our loan portfolio and a reduction in nonaccrual loans. Nonperforming assets declined $27 million, or 17 percent, from December 31, 1996 to $130 million at December 31, 1997. Nonperforming assets as a percent of total assets declined to 0.42% at December 31, 1997 compared with 0.54% a year earlier. Total nonaccrual loans were $109 million at December 31, 1997 compared with $128 million at year-end 1996, resulting in a reduction in the ratio of nonaccrual and renegotiated loans to total loans from 0.61% at December 31, 1996 to 0.48% at year-end 1997. The allowance for credit losses was $452 million, or 413% of total nonaccrual loans, at December 31, 1997 compared with $524 million, or 408% of total nonaccrual loans, at December 31, 1996. - Noninterest income was $463 million in 1997, an increase of $44 million, or 11 percent, over 1996. Service charges on deposit accounts grew $13 million, or 12 percent, reflecting growth in deposit balances while trust and investment management fees increased $14 million, or 15 percent, on growth in trust accounts and assets under management. - Excluding merger and integration expense, noninterest expense was $1,039 million in 1997, an increase of $21 million, or 2 percent, over 1996. This increase was primarily attributable to an increase of $14 million, or 3 percent, in personnel-related expense, a significant portion of which was due to 39 severance payments related to realignment of departments and to higher performance-related incentive compensation, and an increase of $14 million, or 25 percent, in other expenses. These increases were partially offset by a decline of $18 million in net occupancy expense, reflecting a $12 million charge recorded in 1996 related to former banking facilities, as well as merger efficiencies realized in 1997. Excluding the $12 million charge in 1996 and merger and integration expense, noninterest expense increased $33 million over 1996. - The effective tax rate for 1997 was 37% compared with 40% for 1996. Excluding the $25 million after-tax refund from the State of California Franchise Tax Board, the effective tax rate in 1997 was 41%. Excluding a $5 million after-tax benefit from the settlement of a unitary tax issue with the State of California Franchise Tax Board, the effective tax rate in 1996 was also 41%. - The return on average assets for 1997 increased to 1.39% compared to 0.89% for 1996. Excluding the after-tax effect of merger and integration expense, the pro forma return on average assets was 1.40% for 1997 compared to 1.15% for 1996. The return on average common equity for 1997 was 16.05% compared to 10.24% for 1996. Excluding the after-tax effect of merger and integration expense, the pro forma return on average common equity was 16.20% for 1997 compared to 13.33% for 1996. - Total loans at December 31, 1997 were $22.7 billion, an increase of $1.7 billion, or 8 percent, over year-end 1996, primarily from growth in the commercial, financial and industrial loan portfolio. - At December 31, 1997, our Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio was 8.96%, exceeding the minimum regulatory guidelines for bank holding companies of 4%, and the total risk-based capital ratio was 11.05%, exceeding the minimum regulatory guidelines of 8%. The Tier 1 and total risk-based capital ratios for our bank at December 31, 1997 exceeded the regulatory guidelines for "well-capitalized" banks. Our leverage ratio was 8.53% at December 31, 1997, exceeding the minimum regulatory guideline for bank holding companies. 40 NET INTEREST INCOME The table below shows the major components of net interest income and net interest margin.
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1995 1996 1997 ------------------------------------ ------------------------------------ ---------- INTEREST AVERAGE INTEREST AVERAGE AVERAGE INCOME/ YIELD/ AVERAGE INCOME/ YIELD/ AVERAGE BALANCE EXPENSE(1) RATE(1) BALANCE EXPENSE(1) RATE(1) BALANCE ---------- ----------- ----------- ---------- ----------- ----------- ---------- (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) ASSETS: Loans: (2) Domestic.................... $17,783,993 $1,540,694 8.66% $19,328,752 $1,604,799 8.30% $20,332,494 Foreign(3).................. 1,190,547 76,723 6.44 1,398,825 84,693 6.05 1,523,417 Securities -- taxable(4)...... 2,055,504 120,210 5.85 2,138,282 133,170 6.23 2,521,339 Securities -- tax-exempt(4)... 185,934 18,984 10.21 151,970 15,451 10.17 124,174 Interest bearing deposits in banks........................ 930,999 58,201 6.25 911,575 52,709 5.78 968,966 Federal funds sold and securities purchased under resale agreements............ 368,684 22,247 6.03 547,547 30,246 5.52 466,321 Trading account assets........ 333,468 20,578 6.17 240,375 12,960 5.39 355,111 ---------- ----------- ---------- ----------- ---------- Total earning assets...... 22,849,129 1,857,637 8.13 24,717,326 1,934,028 7.82 26,291,822 ----------- ----------- Allowance for credit losses... (573,648) (544,806) (503,126) Cash and due from banks....... 1,617,715 1,926,050 2,006,038 Premises and equipment, net... 411,794 425,943 411,302 Other assets.................. 1,259,853 1,375,221 1,486,956 ---------- ---------- ---------- Total assets.............. $25,564,843 $27,899,734 $29,692,992 ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- LIABILITIES: Domestic deposits: Interest bearing............ $4,955,750 129,860 2.62 $5,001,060 135,821 2.72 $5,340,661 Savings and consumer time... 2,738,588 99,215 3.62 2,837,198 105,350 3.71 2,970,370 Large time.................. 2,474,685 128,974 5.21 4,095,222 218,959 5.35 4,652,293 Foreign deposits(3)........... 1,806,820 96,109 5.32 1,504,067 71,437 4.75 1,589,303 ---------- ----------- ---------- ----------- ---------- Total interest bearing deposits................. 11,975,843 454,158 3.79 13,437,547 531,567 3.96 14,552,627 ---------- ----------- ---------- ----------- ---------- Federal funds purchased and securities sold under repurchase agreements........ 1,384,762 78,908 5.70 933,433 47,095 5.05 1,097,707 Subordinated capital notes.... 615,868 42,538 6.91 458,966 30,104 6.56 354,575 Commercial paper.............. 1,448,739 86,695 5.98 1,620,087 87,411 5.40 1,637,070 Other borrowed funds.......... 731,759 42,561 5.82 1,119,051 62,549 5.59 635,900 ---------- ----------- ---------- ----------- ---------- Total borrowed funds...... 4,181,128 250,702 6.00 4,131,537 227,159 5.50 3,725,252 ---------- ----------- ---------- ----------- ---------- Total interest bearing liabilities.............. 16,156,971 704,860 4.36 17,569,084 758,726 4.32 18,277,879 ----------- ----------- Demand deposits............... 5,994,129 6,663,997 7,514,528 Other liabilities............. 1,081,267 1,206,216 1,295,728 ---------- ---------- ---------- Total liabilities......... 23,232,367 25,439,297 27,088,135 SHAREHOLDER'S EQUITY: Preferred stock............... 135,000 135,000 90,247 Common equity(5).............. 2,197,476 2,325,437 2,514,610 ---------- ---------- ---------- Total shareholders' equity................... 2,332,476 2,460,437 2,604,857 ---------- ---------- ---------- Total liabilities and shareholders' equity..... $25,564,843 $27,899,734 $29,692,992 ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- Net interest income/margin (taxable-equivalent basis).... 1,152,777 5.05% 1,175,302 4.75% Less: taxable-equivalent adjustment.................... 10,444 6,724 ----------- ----------- Net interest income............. $1,142,333 $1,168,578 ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- INTEREST AVERAGE INCOME/ YIELD/ EXPENSE(1) RATE(1) ----------- ----------- ASSETS: Loans: (2) Domestic.................... $1,672,006 8.22% Foreign(3).................. 92,420 6.07 Securities -- taxable(4)...... 158,950 6.30 Securities -- tax-exempt(4)... 12,669 10.20 Interest bearing deposits in banks........................ 56,748 5.86 Federal funds sold and securities purchased under resale agreements............ 26,079 5.59 Trading account assets........ 19,917 5.61 ----------- Total earning assets...... 2,038,789 7.75 ----------- Allowance for credit losses... Cash and due from banks....... Premises and equipment, net... Other assets.................. Total assets.............. LIABILITIES: Domestic deposits: Interest bearing............ 151,768 2.84 Savings and consumer time... 112,808 3.80 Large time.................. 256,007 5.50 Foreign deposits(3)........... 75,398 4.74 ----------- Total interest bearing deposits................. 595,981 4.10 ----------- Federal funds purchased and securities sold under repurchase agreements........ 58,544 5.33 Subordinated capital notes.... 22,850 6.44 Commercial paper.............. 89,912 5.49 Other borrowed funds.......... 34,492 5.42 ----------- Total borrowed funds...... 205,798 5.52 ----------- Total interest bearing liabilities.............. 801,779 4.39 ----------- Demand deposits............... Other liabilities............. Total liabilities......... SHAREHOLDER'S EQUITY: Preferred stock............... Common equity(5).............. Total shareholders' equity................... Total liabilities and shareholders' equity..... Net interest income/margin (taxable-equivalent basis).... 1,237,010 4.70% Less: taxable-equivalent adjustment.................... 5,328 ----------- Net interest income............. $1,231,682 ----------- -----------
- ------------ (1) Yields and interest income are presented on a taxable-equivalent basis using the federal statutory tax rate of 35 percent. (2) Average balances on loans outstanding include all nonperforming and renegotiated loans. The amortized portion of net loan origination fees (costs) is included in interest income on loans, representing an adjustment to the yield. (3) Foreign loans and deposits are those loans and deposits originated in foreign branches. (4) Yields on securities available for sale were based on fair value. The difference between these yields and those based on amortized cost was not significant. (5) Amounts restated to give retroactive effect to the exchange referred to in Note 1 of the accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. 41 Net interest income is interest earned on loans and investments less interest expense on deposit accounts and borrowings. Primary factors affecting the level of net interest income include the margin between the yield earned on interest earning assets and the rate paid on interest bearing liabilities, as well as the volume and composition of average interest earning assets and average interest bearing liabilities. Excluding the provision for credit losses, net interest income on a taxable-equivalent basis was $1,175 million in 1996, compared with $1,237 million in 1997. The increase of $62 million, or 5 percent, was primarily attributable to a $1.6 billion, or 6 percent, increase in average earning assets largely funded by an $851 million, or 13 percent, increase in average demand deposits. Partially offsetting the positive impact of the growth in earning assets and demand deposits on net interest income was a 5 basis point decline in the net interest margin to 4.70%, primarily as a result of both a 14 basis point increase in the cost of interest bearing deposits due to a 25 basis point increase in the Federal Funds rate in March 1997, and a decrease in the average yield on domestic loans of 8 basis points. Average earning assets were $24.7 billion in 1996 compared with $26.3 billion in 1997. This growth was primarily attributable to a $1.1 billion, or 5 percent, increase in average loans and a $355 million, or 16 percent, increase in average securities. Average commercial, financial and industrial loans, which increased $582 million, and average commercial mortgage loans, which increased $437 million, contributed most of the loan growth. See "Loans" on page 48 for additional commentary on loan portfolio growth. The increase in primarily fixed rate securities reflected interest rate risk management actions to reduce our exposure to declines in interest rates. The $1.6 billion, or 6 percent, increase in average earning assets over 1996 was primarily funded by increases in average demand deposits and average interest bearing core deposits. Increases in these categories were: demand deposits $851 million, or 13 percent; interest bearing domestic deposits $340 million, or 7 percent; and savings and consumer time deposits $133 million, or 5 percent. The increase in demand deposits in 1997 was partially due to an influx of new customer relationships, arising from the recent merger and acquisition activities of other financial institutions in the California market during the year. 42 ANALYSIS OF CHANGES IN NET INTEREST INCOME The following table shows the changes in the components of net interest income on a taxable-equivalent basis. The changes in net interest income between periods have been reflected as attributable either to volume or rate changes. For purposes of this table, changes which are not solely due to volume or rate changes are allocated to rate.
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 1996 VERSUS 1995 1997 VERSUS 1996 ---------------------------------- ---------------------------------- INCREASE (DECREASE) DUE TO CHANGE INCREASE (DECREASE) DUE TO IN CHANGE IN ---------------------------------- ---------------------------------- AVERAGE AVERAGE AVERAGE AVERAGE NET VOLUME RATE NET CHANGE VOLUME RATE CHANGE ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) CHANGES IN INTEREST INCOME: Loans: Domestic...................................... $ 133,776 $ (69,671) $ 64,105 $ 83,311 $ (16,104) $ 67,207 Foreign(1).................................... 13,413 (5,443) 7,970 7,538 189 7,727 Securities -- taxable........................... 4,843 8,117 12,960 23,856 1,924 25,780 Securities -- tax-exempt........................ (3,468) (65) (3,533) (2,826) 44 (2,782) Interest bearing deposits in banks.............. (1,214) (4,278) (5,492) 3,317 722 4,039 Federal funds sold and securities purchased under resale agreements........................ 10,785 (2,786) 7,999 (4,484) 317 (4,167) Trading account assets.......................... (5,744) (1,874) (7,618) 6,184 773 6,957 ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- Total earning assets........................ 152,391 (76,000) 76,391 116,896 (12,135) 104,761 ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- CHANGES IN INTEREST EXPENSE: Domestic deposits: Interest bearing.............................. 1,187 4,774 5,961 9,237 6,710 15,947 Savings and consumer time..................... 3,572 2,563 6,135 4,941 2,517 7,458 Large time.................................... 84,458 5,527 89,985 29,803 7,245 37,048 Foreign deposits(1)............................. (16,104) (8,568) (24,672) 4,049 (88) 3,961 ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- Total interest bearing deposits............. 73,113 4,296 77,409 48,030 16,384 64,414 ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- Federal funds purchased and securities sold under repurchase agreements.................... (25,718) (6,095) (31,813) 8,296 3,153 11,449 Subordinated capital notes...................... (10,837) (1,597) (12,434) (6,848) (406) (7,254) Commercial paper................................ 10,254 (9,538) 716 916 1,585 2,501 Other borrowed funds............................ 22,526 (2,538) 19,988 (27,006) (1,051) (28,057) ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- Total borrowed funds........................ (3,775) (19,768) (23,543) (24,642) 3,281 (21,361) ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- Total interest bearing liabilities.......... 69,338 (15,472) 53,866 23,388 19,665 43,053 ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- Changes in net interest income.............. $ 83,053 $ (60,528) $ 22,525 $ 93,508 $ (31,800) $ 61,708 ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
- --------- (1) Foreign loans and deposits are those loans and deposits originated in foreign branches. Interest income on a taxable-equivalent basis increased $105 million in 1997, primarily due to growth in interest income from domestic loans and securities, which reflected higher average balances outstanding, partially offset by a lower average yield primarily on domestic loans. 43 Interest expense increased $43 million in 1997 due to higher interest expense on interest bearing deposits, primarily reflecting higher average deposit balances and higher average rates. Interest expense on borrowed funds declined $21 million in 1997, reflecting lower volumes, offset by a 2 basis point increase in the average rate paid. NONINTEREST INCOME
INCREASE (DECREASE) ---------------------------------------------- YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, ---------------------------------------------- YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996 VERSUS 1995 1997 VERSUS 1996 ---------------------------------- ---------------------- ---------------------- 1995 1996 1997 AMOUNT PERCENT AMOUNT PERCENT ---------- ---------- ---------- --------- ----------- --------- ----------- (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) Service charges on deposit accounts.......................... $ 95,177 $ 101,975 $ 114,647 $ 6,798 7% $ 12,672 12% Trust and investment management fees.............................. 87,743 93,479 107,527 5,736 7 14,048 15 International commissions and fees.............................. 68,621 66,108 66,122 (2,513) (4) 14 -- Credit card merchant fees........... 45,767 49,778 57,128 4,011 9 7,350 15 Merchant banking fees............... 24,483 23,929 24,924 (554) (2) 995 4 Foreign exchange trading gains, net............................... 19,043 13,255 16,268 (5,788) (30) 3,013 23 Brokerage commissions and fees...... 9,270 12,932 15,569 3,662 40 2,637 20 Securities gains (losses), net...... (702) 4,502 2,711 5,204 nm (1,791) (40) Other............................... 45,917 52,718 58,105 6,801 15 5,387 10 ---------- ---------- ---------- --------- --------- Total noninterest income........ $ 395,319 $ 418,676 $ 463,001 $ 23,357 6% $ 44,325 11% ---------- ---------- ---------- --------- --------- ---------- ---------- ---------- --------- ---------
- --------- nm = not meaningful Noninterest income in 1997 was $463 million, an increase of $44 million, or 11 percent, over 1996. This included a $13 million increase in revenue from service charges on deposit accounts, a $14 million increase in trust and investment management fees, a $7 million increase in credit card merchant fees, a $3 million increase in foreign exchange trading gains, net, a $3 million increase in brokerage commissions and fees, and a $5 million increase in other noninterest income, partially offset by a $2 million decrease in securities gains, net. Revenue from service charges on deposit accounts was $115 million in 1997, an increase of 12 percent over 1996. The increase was primarily attributable to an increase in the volume of non-credit services provided. Trust and investment management fees were $108 million in 1997, 15 percent higher than in 1996, primarily due to an increase in assets under management, which resulted in higher mutual fund management fees and personal trust fees. Credit card merchant fees were $57 million in 1997, an increase of 15 percent over 1996. The increase was primarily due to an increase in the volume of credit card drafts deposited by merchants. Foreign exchange trading gains, net increased $3 million, or 23 percent, in 1997, primarily due to more volatility in the foreign exchange markets in 1997. 44 Brokerage commissions and fees were $16 million in 1997, an increase of 20 percent over 1996. The increase was primarily attributable to brokerage commissions on non-proprietary mutual fund sales. Other noninterest income in 1997 was $5 million, or 10 percent, higher than in 1996. Included in other noninterest income in 1997 was an $8 million gain related to a real estate joint venture, compared with gains of $2 million related to a real estate joint venture and $2 million related to a non-recurring insurance refund recognized in 1996. NONINTEREST EXPENSE
INCREASE (DECREASE) ------------------------------------------------- YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, ------------------------------------------------- YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996/1995 1997/1996 -------------------------------------- ----------------------- ------------------------ 1995 1996 1997 AMOUNT PERCENT AMOUNT PERCENT ---------- ------------ ------------ ---------- ----------- ----------- ----------- (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) Salaries and other compensation.................. $ 432,581 $ 448,793 $ 461,915 $ 16,212 4% $ 13,122 3% Employee benefits............... 104,090 108,454 109,729 4,364 4 1,275 1 ---------- ------------ ------------ ---------- ----------- Personnel-related expense..... 536,671 557,247 571,644 20,576 4 14,397 3 Net occupancy................... 92,863 103,335 85,630 10,472 11 (17,705) (17) Equipment....................... 55,056 55,942 56,137 886 2 195 -- Communications.................. 35,806 40,133 42,372 4,327 12 2,239 6 Credit card processing.......... 31,288 37,091 42,274 5,803 19 5,183 14 Advertising and public relations..................... 20,911 28,788 28,664 7,877 38 (124) -- Professional services........... 26,197 24,342 28,075 (1,855) (7) 3,733 15 Data processing................. 18,557 22,140 25,973 3,583 19 3,833 17 Printing and office supplies.... 22,626 27,085 24,098 4,459 20 (2,987) (11) Software........................ 13,839 15,895 16,562 2,056 15 667 4 Travel.......................... 12,183 14,936 15,763 2,753 23 827 6 Intangible asset amortization.................. 13,353 13,335 13,352 (18) -- 17 -- Armored car..................... 13,792 13,296 12,209 (496) (4) (1,087) (8) Regulatory authority assessments................... 23,431 4,048 5,778 (19,383) (83) 1,730 43 Foreclosed asset expense (income)...................... (3,213) 2,889 (1,268) 6,102 nm (4,157) nm Other........................... 64,741 56,938 71,365 (7,803) (12) 14,427 25 ---------- ------------ ------------ ---------- ----------- Noninterest expense, excluding merger and integration expense...................... 978,101 1,017,440 1,038,628 39,339 4 21,188 2 Merger and integration expense....................... -- 117,464 6,037 117,464 nm (111,427) (95) ---------- ------------ ------------ ---------- ----------- Total noninterest expense... $ 978,101 $ 1,134,904 $ 1,044,665 $ 156,803 16 % $ (90,239) (8)% ---------- ------------ ------------ ---------- ----------- ---------- ------------ ------------ ---------- -----------
- --------- nm = not meaningful 45 Noninterest expense, excluding merger and integration expense, was $1,039 million in 1997, an increase of $21 million, or 2 percent, over 1996. This included a $14 million increase in personnel-related expense, a $5 million increase in credit card processing expense, a $4 million increase in data processing expense, and a $14 million increase in other noninterest expense, partially offset by an $18 million decrease in net occupancy expense and a $4 million decrease in foreclosed asset expense. Personnel-related expense was $572 million in 1997, an increase of $14 million, or 3 percent, compared to 1996. This increase was primarily due to the increase in salaries and other compensation expense, a significant portion of which was due to severance payments related to realignment of departments and to higher performance-related incentive compensation. Credit card processing expense was $42 million in 1997, an increase of $5 million, or 14 percent, over 1996 due to higher merchant volumes. Data processing expense was $26 million in 1997, an increase of $4 million, or 17 percent, over 1996 due to increased activity in data processing systems supporting the growth in deposits. Other noninterest expense increased $14 million in 1997. Of the total increase, $7.5 million reflected additional expenses incurred to support higher deposit volumes. Net occupancy expense was $86 million in 1997, $18 million, or 17 percent, lower than the previous year. The decrease in net occupancy expense was primarily due to a $12 million charge related to former banking facilities in 1996. Excluding this charge, net occupancy expense in 1997 declined 6 percent due to merger-related efficiencies realized in 1997. Foreclosed asset expense decreased $4 million in 1997. The decrease was primarily due to lower write-downs and maintenance and selling expenses, reflecting a 28 percent reduction in the portfolio of foreclosed assets. MERGER AND INTEGRATION EXPENSE Merger and integration expense of $124 million in total was recorded in 1996 and 1997 to cover $38 million of personnel expense for severance, retention and other employee related costs, $54 million for facilities expense related to redundant banking facilities and $32 million in professional services and other expense as a result of the combination of Union Bank and BanCal Tri-State Corporation. The following table presents merger and integration expense provisions in 1996 and 1997, the cash and noncash utilization of those expense provisions during the periods, and the resulting liability balances as of December 31, 1996 and 1997.
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, --------------------- 1996 1997 ---------- --------- (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) Balance, accrued merger and integration expense, beginning of period....................... $ -- $ 54,344 Provision for merger and integration costs................................................. 117,464 6,037 Utilization for the period: Cash..................................................................................... 40,155 35,809 Noncash.................................................................................. 22,965 1,642 ---------- --------- Total utilization...................................................................... 63,120 37,451 ---------- --------- Balance, accrued merger and integration expense, end of period............................. $ 54,344 $ 22,930 ---------- --------- ---------- ---------
At December 31, 1997, the liability balance included amounts primarily for severance payments that are being paid on a periodic basis and for lease payments that are continuing over the expected term of the leases. 46 INCOME TAX EXPENSE
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, ---------------------------------- 1995 1996 1997 ---------- ---------- ---------- (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) Income before income taxes................................................... $ 506,301 $ 412,350 $ 650,018 Income tax expense........................................................... 193,359 162,892 238,722 Effective tax rate........................................................... 38% 40% 37%
Our effective tax rate in 1996 was 40% compared with 37% in 1997. Excluding a $5 million after-tax benefit recognized in 1996 from a settlement with the State of California Franchise Tax Board for 1985 and 1986, the effective tax rate in 1996 was 41%. The lower 1997 effective tax rate was the result of an after-tax refund from the State of California Franchise Tax Board of approximately $25 million to settle litigation, administration, and audit disputes covering the years 1975-1987. Excluding the State of California Franchise Tax Board refund, the effective tax rate for 1997 was also 41%. CREDIT RISK MANAGEMENT Our principal business activity is the extension of credit in the form of loans or other credit substitutes to individuals and businesses. Our policies and applicable laws and regulations governing the extension of credit require risk analysis as well as ongoing portfolio and credit management through loan product diversification, lending limit constraints, credit review and approval policies, and extensive internal monitoring. We manage and control credit risk through diversification of the portfolio by type of loan, industry concentration, dollar limits on multiple loans to the same borrower, geographic distribution and type of borrower. Geographic diversification of loans originated through our branch network is generally within California, Oregon and Washington, which we consider to be our principal markets. In addition, we will continue to originate and participate in lending activities outside these states, as well as internationally. In analyzing our existing loan portfolios, we apply specific monitoring policies and procedures which vary according to the relative risk profile and other characteristics of the loans within the various portfolios. Our residential and consumer loans are relatively homogeneous and no single loan is individually significant in terms of its size or potential risk of loss. Therefore, we review our residential and consumer portfolios by analyzing their performance as a pool of loans. In contrast, our monitoring process for the commercial, financial and industrial; construction; commercial mortgage; and foreign loan portfolios includes a periodic review of individual loans. Loans that are performing but have shown some signs of weakness are evaluated under more stringent reporting and oversight. We review these loans to assess the ability of the borrowing entity to continue to service all of its interest and principal obligations and as a result may adjust the risk grade accordingly. In the event that we believe that full collection of principal and interest is not reasonably assured, the loan will be appropriately downgraded and, if warranted, placed on nonaccrual status, even though the loan may be current as to principal and interest payments. We have a Credit Policy Forum, composed of the Chief Credit Officer, senior credit officers, and appropriate line officers who establish policy, credit quality criteria, portfolio guidelines and other controls. Credit Administration, together with a series of loan committees, has the responsibility for administering the credit approval process, as well as the implementation and administration of our credit policies and lending practices and procedures. These policies require an extensive evaluation of credit requests and continuing review of existing credits in order to promptly identify, monitor and quantify evidence of deterioration of asset credit quality or potential loss. As another part of the control process, an independent internal credit review and examination function provides quality assurance that loans and commitments are made and maintained as prescribed by our credit 47 policies and that the assets are appropriately and timely risk graded. This includes a review of compliance with our underwriting policies when the loan is initially extended and subsequent on-site examinations to ensure continued compliance. LOANS The following table shows loans outstanding at year-end by loan type. Loans outstanding by loan type as a percentage of total loans is shown for 1993 through 1997.
DECEMBER 31, ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 -------------------- -------------------- -------------------- -------------------- --------- (DOLLARS IN MILLIONS) Domestic: Commercial, financial and industrial.................. $ 8,135 46% $ 8,547 47% $ 9,684 47% $ 9,496 45% $ 10,747 Construction................. 877 5 464 3 370 2 358 2 293 Mortgage: Residential................ 1,964 11 2,253 12 2,642 13 2,961 14 2,961 Commercial................. 2,088 12 1,778 10 2,143 10 2,598 12 2,952 --------- --- --------- --- --------- --- --------- --- --------- Total mortgage........... 4,052 23 4,031 22 4,785 23 5,559 26 5,913 Consumer: Installment................ 1,351 8 1,644 9 1,812 9 2,063 10 2,091 Home equity................ 1,302 7 1,222 7 1,222 6 1,113 5 993 Credit card and other lines of credit.......... 207 1 219 1 309 2 303 1 270 --------- --- --------- --- --------- --- --------- --- --------- Total consumer........... 2,860 16 3,085 17 3,343 17 3,479 16 3,354 Lease financing.............. 831 4 829 5 845 4 800 4 875 --------- --- --------- --- --------- --- --------- --- --------- Total loans in domestic offices................ 16,755 94 16,956 94 19,027 93 19,692 93 21,182 --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- Loans originated in foreign branches..................... 1,004 6 1,110 6 1,405 7 1,358 7 1,559 --------- --- --------- --- --------- --- --------- --- --------- Total loans.............. $ 17,759 100% $ 18,066 100% $ 20,432 100% $ 21,050 100% $ 22,741 --------- --- --------- --- --------- --- --------- --- --------- --------- --- --------- --- --------- --- --------- --- --------- Domestic: Commercial, financial and industrial.................. 47% Construction................. 1 Mortgage: Residential................ 13 Commercial................. 13 --- Total mortgage........... 26 Consumer: Installment................ 9 Home equity................ 5 Credit card and other lines of credit.......... 1 --- Total consumer........... 15 Lease financing.............. 4 --- Total loans in domestic offices................ 93 Loans originated in foreign branches..................... 7 --- Total loans.............. 100% --- ---
Our lending activities are predominantly domestic, with such loans comprising approximately 93 percent of the portfolio at December 31, 1997. Total loans at December 31, 1997 were $22.7 billion, an increase of $1,691 million, or 8 percent, from one year earlier. The increase was primarily attributable to growth in the commercial, financial and industrial loan portfolio, which increased $1,251 million from 1996, and to growth in the commercial mortgage loan portfolio, which increased $354 million. COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL LOANS. Commercial, financial and industrial loans represent the largest category in the loan portfolio. These loans are extended principally to major corporations, middle market businesses, and small businesses, with no industry concentration exceeding ten percent of total commercial, financial and industrial loans. Our commercial market lending originates primarily through its banking office network. These offices, which rely extensively on relationship oriented banking, provide many services including cash management services, lines of credit, accounts receivable and inventory financing. Separately, we originate or participate in a wide variety of financial services to major corporations. These services include traditional commercial banking and specialized financing tailored to the needs of each customer's specific industry. Presently, we are active in the communications and media, energy related services, retailing and financial services industries. 48 At December 31, 1997, the commercial, financial and industrial loan portfolio was $10,747 million, or 47 percent, of the total loan portfolio. The increase of $1,251 million, or 13 percent, from the previous year-end was primarily attributable to loans extended to large corporations in industries where our bank has specialized lending expertise. CONSTRUCTION AND COMMERCIAL MORTGAGE LOANS. We engage in nonresidential real estate lending which includes commercial mortgage loans and construction loans secured by deeds of trust. Construction loans are made primarily to residential builders and to commercial property developers. At December 31, 1997, construction loans were $293 million, $65 million lower than at the end of the previous year. Commercial mortgage loans were $2,952 million, an increase of $354 million, or 14 percent, from a year earlier. This increase was primarily attributable to a strong recovery in the California real estate market reflecting the continuing improvement in the West Coast economy, particularly in the real estate sector. RESIDENTIAL MORTGAGE LOANS. We originate residential loans through its branch network in California, Oregon, and Washington, and periodically purchases loans in its market area. At December 31, 1997, residential loans were $2,961 million, unchanged from the prior year. CONSUMER LOANS. Through our branch network, we originate consumer loans, such as vehicle-secured installment loans, home equity lines where advances are generally secured by second deeds of trust on residential real estate, and credit card loans. At December 31, 1996, consumer loans were $3,479 million, or 16 percent of total loans, compared with $3,354 million, or 15 percent of total loans, at year-end 1997. LEASE FINANCING. We enter into direct financing and leveraged leases through an agreement with a subsidiary of The Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi. In addition, we originate auto leases. At December 31, 1997, lease financing outstandings were $875 million, an increase of $75 million from the end of 1996. LOANS ORIGINATED IN FOREIGN BRANCHES. Our loans originated in foreign branches consist primarily of short-term credit extensions to financial institutions located primarily in Asia and short-term commercial and industrial loans to major Japanese, Korean, and Taiwanese corporations. At December 31, 1996, loans originated in foreign branches totaled $1,358 million, or 7 percent of the total loan portfolio, compared with $1,559 million, or 7 percent of total loans, at December 31, 1997. CROSS-BORDER OUTSTANDINGS Our cross-border outstandings reflect additional economic and political risks that are not reflected in domestic outstandings. These risks include those arising from exchange rate fluctuations and restrictions on the transfer of funds. The following table sets forth our cross-border outstandings as of December 31, 1995, 1996 and 1997 for each country where such outstandings exceeded one percent of total assets. The cross-border outstandings were compiled based upon category and domicile of ultimate risk and are comprised of balances with banks, trading securities, securities available for sale, securities purchased under resale agreements, loans, accrued interest receivable, acceptances outstanding and investments with foreign 49 entities. The amounts outstanding for each country exclude local currency outstandings. We do not have significant local currency outstanding to the individual countries listed in the following table that are not hedged or are not funded by local currency borrowings.
PUBLIC CORPORATIONS FINANCIAL SECTOR AND OTHER TOTAL INSTITUTIONS ENTITIES BORROWERS OUTSTANDINGS ----------- ----------- --------------- ------------- (DOLLARS IN MILLIONS) December 31, 1995 Japan....................................................... $ 1,111 $ -- $ 567 $ 1,678 Korea....................................................... 641 -- 269 910 December 31, 1996 Japan....................................................... 1,373 -- 452 1,825 Korea....................................................... 574 8 330 912 December 31, 1997 Japan....................................................... 401 -- 438 839 Korea....................................................... 561 10 257 828 Thailand.................................................... 320 -- -- 320
The economic condition and the ability of some countries, to which we have cross-border exposure, to manage their external debt obligations have been impacted by the Asian economic crisis beginning in the second half of 1997. The events leading to the crisis included currency devaluations, business failures, principally caused by excessive debt levels and overcapacity, and some loss of confidence in the banking system in the affected countries, resulting mainly from past lending practices and the associated impact of internal and external economic conditions. The crisis resulted in a substantial erosion of international confidence, rapid declines in stock market valuations, steep increases in interest rates and further pressure on the debt structures of the corporate and financial market participants. International Monetary Fund programs have been established or are in the process of being established which, in cooperation with steps being taken by the local governments and other global institutions, are designed to restore confidence. The success of these programs is still being evaluated. We are managing our exposures in these and other impacted countries very cautiously with a view to minimizing risk and supporting its long-term and viable customer relationships. High risk situations are being identified and reduced where possible, and additional reserves against potential credit losses have been identified and allocated, as determined by management at year end. None of our cross-border exposure has been affected by the recently announced debt restructuring program with South Korea. Although management cannot predict the ultimate impact of the crisis on our financial position and results of operations since much depends on the effect of the stabilizing activities already under way, management believes that the continuation of internal supervision, monitoring and portfolio risk management practices will be effective in minimizing the impact over and above that already identified. Increases in non-accrual loans, together with some related increases in charge-off activity, may occur as events unfold. Management, in accordance with its established risk management practices, will also continue to review the impact of the crisis on the stability of other countries and the potential impact on domestic business activities, particularly in our core West Coast markets. PROVISION FOR CREDIT LOSSES We did not record a provision for credit losses during 1997, compared with a $40 million provision that was recorded in 1996. Provisions for credit losses are charged to income to bring our allowance for credit losses to a level deemed appropriate by management based on the factors discussed under "--Allowance for Credit Losses" below. We did not record a provision for credit losses in 1997 because, based on a review of 50 the factors, management believed that the allowance for credit losses was adequate to cover probable losses inherent in the loan and lease portfolio and firm commitments at each quarter end, including December 31, 1997. ALLOWANCE FOR CREDIT LOSSES We maintain an allowance for credit losses to absorb losses inherent in the loan and lease portfolio. The allowance is based on ongoing, quarterly assessments of the probable estimated losses inherent in the loan and lease portfolio, and to a lesser extent, unused commitments to provide financing. Our methodology for assessing the appropriateness of the allowance consists of several key elements, which include: - the formula allowance, - specific allowances for identified problem loans and portfolio segments, and - the unallocated allowance. In addition, the allowance incorporates the results of measuring impaired loans as provided in: - Statement of Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 114, "Accounting by Creditors for Impairment of a Loan," and - SFAS No. 118, "Accounting by Creditors for Impairment of a Loan--Income Recognition and Disclosures." These accounting standards prescribe the measurement methods, income recognition and disclosures concerning impaired loans. The formula allowance is calculated by applying loss factors to outstanding loans and leases and certain unused commitments, in each case based on the internal risk grade of these loans, pools of loans, leases or commitments. Changes in risk grades of both performing and nonperforming loans affect the amount of the formula allowance. Loss factors are based on our historical loss experience and may be adjusted for significant factors that, in management's judgment, affect the collectibility of the portfolio as of the evaluation date. Loss factors are described as follows: - Problem graded loan loss factors are obtained from a migration model that tracks four years of historical loss experience. We are exploring changes to the migration model to track historical loss experience over an eight-year period, which management believes approximates a business cycle. - Pass graded loan loss factors are based on the average annual net charge off rate over a six-year period. - Pooled loan loss factors, not individually graded loans, are based on expected net chargeoffs for one year. Pooled loans are loans and leases that are homogeneous in nature, such as consumer installment and residential mortgage loans and automobile leases. Specific allowances are established where management has identified significant conditions or circumstances related to a credit that management believes indicate the probability that a loss has been incurred in excess of the amount determined by the application of the formula allowance. The unallocated allowance is composed of two elements. The first element, which is based on our credit policy, consists of an amount that is at least 20% to 25% of the formula allowance and the specific allowance. This element recognizes the model and estimation risk associated with the formula and specific allowances. The second element is based upon management's evaluation of various conditions, the effects of which are not directly measured in determining the formula and specific allowances. The evaluation of the inherent loss regarding these conditions involves a higher degree of uncertainty because they are not identified with specific problem credits or portfolio segments. The conditions evaluated in connection with the unallocated allowance include the following conditions that existed as of the balance sheet date: 51 - then-existing general economic and business conditions affecting our key lending areas, - credit quality trends, including trends in nonperforming loans expected to result from existing conditions, - collateral values, - loan volumes and concentrations, - seasoning of the loan portfolio, - specific industry conditions within portfolio segments, - recent loss experience in particular segments of the portfolio, - duration of the current business cycle, - bank regulatory examination results and - findings of our internal credit examiners. Executive management reviews these conditions quarterly in discussion with our senior credit officers. If any of these conditions is evidenced by a specifically identifiable problem credit or portfolio segment as of the evaluation date, management's estimate of the effect of this condition may be reflected as a specific allowance applicable to this credit or portfolio segment. Where any of these conditions is not evidenced by a specifically identifiable problem credit or portfolio segment as of the evaluation date, management's evaluation of the probable loss concerning this condition is reflected in the unallocated allowance. The allowance for credit losses is based upon estimates of probable losses inherent in the loan and lease portfolio. The amount actually observed for these losses can vary significantly from the estimated amounts. Our methodology includes several features that are intended to reduce the differences between estimated and actual losses. The loss migration model that is used to establish the loan loss factors for problem graded loans is designed to be self-correcting by taking into account our recent loss experience. Similarly, by basing the pass graded loan loss factors on loss experience over the last six years, the methodology is designed to take our recent loss experience into account. Pooled loan loss factors are adjusted quarterly based upon the level of net chargeoffs expected by management in the next twelve months. Furthermore, our methodology permits adjustments to any loss factor used in the computation of the formula allowance in the event that, in management's judgment, significant factors that affect the collectibility of the portfolio as of the evaluation date are not reflected in the loss factors. By assessing the probable estimated losses inherent in the loan and lease portfolio on a quarterly basis, we are able to adjust specific and inherent loss estimates based upon any more recent information that has become available. 52 The following table presents the allocation of the allowance for credit losses. The percentages reflect the allowance allocated to each respective loan category at period end, as a percentage of the total period end balance of that loan category, as set forth in the "Loans" table on page 48.
DECEMBER 31, ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 -------------------- -------------------- -------------------- -------------------- --------- (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) Domestic: Commercial, financial and industrial.............. $ 205,398 2.52% $ 146,784 1.72% $ 174,146 1.80% $ 166,100 1.75% $ 123,610 Construction............. 106,398 12.13 69,787 15.04 24,752 6.69 5,700 1.59 3,221 Mortgage: Residential............ 31,409 1.60 23,581 1.05 5,466 0.21 4,000 0.14 2,700 Commercial............. 139,303 6.67 70,130 3.94 59,931 2.80 39,000 1.50 60,680 --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- Total mortgage....... 170,712 4.21 93,711 2.32 65,397 1.37 43,000 0.77 63,380 Consumer: Installment............ 13,100 0.97 12,500 0.76 13,200 0.73 10,400 0.50 11,400 Home equity............ 6,062 0.47 7,143 0.58 5,532 0.45 4,900 0.44 3,600 Credit card and other lines of credit....... 15,171 7.33 17,101 7.81 32,799 10.61 34,000 11.22 30,500 --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- Total consumer....... 34,333 1.20 36,744 1.19 51,531 1.54 49,300 1.42 45,500 Lease financing.......... 12,500 1.50 10,000 1.21 1,300 0.15 5,300 0.66 4,862 --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- Total domestic allowance........... 529,341 3.16 357,026 2.11 317,126 1.67 269,400 1.37 240,573 Foreign allowance.......... 14,293 1.42 15,330 1.38 13,968 0.99 9,394 0.69 39,313 Unallocated................ 148,950 190,786 224,055 245,152 171,806 --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- Total allowance for credit losses....... $ 692,584 3.90% $ 563,142 3.12% $ 555,149 2.72% $ 523,946 2.49% $ 451,692 --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- Domestic: Commercial, financial and industrial.............. 1.15% Construction............. 1.10 Mortgage: Residential............ 0.09 Commercial............. 2.06 Total mortgage....... 1.07 Consumer: Installment............ 0.55 Home equity............ 0.36 Credit card and other lines of credit....... 11.30 Total consumer....... 1.36 Lease financing.......... 0.56 Total domestic allowance........... 1.14 Foreign allowance.......... 2.52 Unallocated................ Total allowance for credit losses....... 1.99%
53 The following table presents a reconciliation of changes in our allowance for credit losses.
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, ---------------------------------------------------------- 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) Balance, beginning of year........................... $ 790,479 $ 692,584 $ 563,142 $ 555,149 $ 523,946 Loans charged off: Commercial, financial and industrial............... 99,280 105,774 47,524 42,134 58,664 Construction....................................... 58,835 32,151 9,401 3,249 120 Mortgage........................................... 113,791 100,613 29,330 13,483 5,058 Consumer........................................... 39,576 31,806 44,627 56,361 55,336 Lease financing.................................... 11,432 2,940 2,422 2,623 3,601 Foreign(1)......................................... 201 533 295 1,250 -- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- Total loans charged off.......................... 323,115 273,817 133,599 119,100 122,779 Recoveries of loans previously charged off: Commercial, financial and industrial............... 41,552 39,177 39,178 22,341 23,371 Construction....................................... 2,955 5,868 3,195 132 9,054 Mortgage........................................... 6,201 16,228 18,500 12,277 3,292 Consumer........................................... 8,872 8,915 10,924 12,906 14,946 Lease financing.................................... 3,353 435 311 368 351 Foreign(1)......................................... 11,229 627 295 -- -- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- Total recoveries of loans previously charged off............................................. 74,162 71,250 72,403 48,024 51,014 ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- Net loans charged off.......................... 248,953 202,567 61,196 71,076 71,765 Provision for credit losses.......................... 151,000 73,000 53,250 40,000 -- Foreign translation adjustment and other net additions (deductions)............................. 58 125 (47) (127) (489) ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- Balance, end of year................................. $ 692,584 $ 563,142 $ 555,149 $ 523,946 $ 451,692 ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- Allowance for credit losses to total loans........... 3.90% 3.12% 2.72% 2.49% 1.99% Provision for credit losses to net loans charged off................................................ 60.65 36.04 87.02 56.28 -- Recoveries of loans to loans charged off in the previous year...................................... 24.38 22.05 26.44 35.95 42.83 Net loans charged off to average loans outstanding... 1.37 1.15 0.32 0.34 0.33 Allowance for credit losses to nonaccrual loans.............................................. 84.82 161.08 266.56 408.48 413.12
- --------- (1) Foreign loans are those loans originated in foreign branches. At December 31, 1997, our allowance for credit losses was $452 million, or 1.99% of the total loan portfolio, and 413% of total nonaccrual loans. This compares with an allowance for credit losses of $524 million, or 2.49% of the total loan portfolio, and 408% of total nonaccrual loans at December 31, 1996. At year-end 1997, the unallocated portion of the allowance for credit losses was $172 million compared with $245 million at the end of 1996. At December 31, 1997, the allocated portion of the allowance for credit losses included $108 million related to special mention and classified credits, compared to $134 million at December 31, 1996. Special mention and classified credits are those that are internally risk graded as "special mention," "substandard" or "doubtful." Special mention credits are potentially weak, as the borrower has begun to exhibit deteriorating trends which, if not corrected, could jeopardize repayment of 54 the loan and result in further downgrade. Substandard credits have well-defined weaknesses which, if not corrected, could jeopardize the full satisfaction of the debt. A credit classified as "doubtful" has critical weaknesses that make full collection improbable. During 1997, there were no changes in estimation methods or assumptions that affected our methodology for assessing the appropriateness of the allowance for credit losses, except that we extended the average annual net chargeoff rate for pass graded loans from 4.75 years to 6 years. The impact of this change resulted in an increase of approximately $13 million in the formula allowance. We extended the average annual net chargeoff rate to better reflect the business cycle. Changes in assumptions regarding the effects of economic and business conditions on borrowers and other factors, which are described below, affected the assessment of the unallocated allowance. In addition, as described below, we allocated a portion of the unallocated allowance to foreign loans amid concerns that the Asian financial turmoil had adversely impacted companies and financial institutions in Asian markets in which we operate. During 1997, we had net loans charged off of $72 million compared to net loans charged off of $71 million in 1996. Recoveries of loans previously charged off increased by $3 million, and the percentage of current year recoveries to loans charged off in the previous year increased from 35.95% in 1996 to 42.83% in 1997. Loans charged off in 1997 increased by $4 million, primarily due to a $17 million increase in commercial, financial and industrial loans charged off, partially offset by a $8 million decrease in mortgage loans charged off. Chargeoffs reflect the realization of losses in the portfolio that were recognized previously through provisions for credit losses. At December 31, 1997, the allowance for credit losses exceeded the net loans charged off during 1997, reflecting management's belief, based on the foregoing analysis, that there are additional losses inherent in the portfolio. At December 31, 1997, our average annual net chargeoffs for the past five years were $131.2 million, compared with $166.4 million at December 31, 1996. These net chargeoffs represent 3.4 years of losses based on the level of the allowance for credit losses at December 31, 1997 and 3.1 years of losses based on the level of the allowance for credit losses at December 31, 1996. Historical net chargeoffs are not necessarily indicative of the amount of net chargeoffs that we will realize in the future. We did not record a provision for credit losses during 1997. The decision not to record a provision was based upon management's application of the allowance methodology and the factors described above, particularly, the level of net chargeoffs and the decline in the level of nonperforming loans. Although management determined that no provision for credit losses was necessary in 1997, it noted that particular factors could necessitate the resumption of provisioning in the future. In particular, management noted that although net chargeoffs were relatively stable from 1996 to 1997, net chargeoffs were higher in the last three quarters of 1997. Furthermore, management noted that although the level of net chargeoffs and the decline in nonperforming loans favorably impacted our asset quality ratios, the total portfolio of commercial, financial and industrial loans and commercial mortgage loans was increasing. Losses inherent in both of these types of credits are more difficult to assess because historically they have been more volatile than losses from other credits. Management also considered the effect on global economic conditions of the Asian financial crisis. At December 31, 1997, cross-border loans and acceptances to Japan, Korea, Malaysia, Thailand, Vietnam, Singapore, Indonesia, the Philippines, China, Taiwan and Hong Kong totaled $2.1 billion. Although at December 31, 1997, we had not identified any specific losses related to our Asia/Pacific exposures, management believed that it was probable that the Asian financial turmoil had adversely impacted companies and financial institutions in Asia/Pacific markets in which we operate. In light of this concern, we allocated $29 million from the unallocated portion of the allowance at December 31, 1997 to foreign loans. The allocated amount was based upon the total amount of foreign loans to corporate borrowers in Asian countries, and management's assessment of the quantified losses inherent in the Asia/Pacific portfolio segment. In addition, we believe that the historical loss factors for the Asia/Pacific exposures failed to estimate the total probable inherent losses because we had not suffered any credit losses in the foreign loan 55 portfolio during the four-year historical loss cycle used to establish the problem loan loss factors. Based upon this concern, as well as the other factors described in "Cross-Border Outstandings" above, including the magnitude of our exposure to the Asia/Pacific segment, management does not believe that the $29 million allocated to foreign loans is sufficient to cover all of the losses inherent in the foreign loan portfolio and, accordingly, these factors were considered by management in its overall assessment of the unallocated allowance. In addition to the impact of the Asian financial turmoil on companies and financial institutions in Asian markets in which we operate, management considered the effects of the Asian turmoil on companies and financial institutions in the domestic, primarily California, and foreign, other than Asia/Pacific, markets in which we operate. As of December 31, 1997, management believed that the impact of the Asian financial turmoil on the collectibility of loans and leases to domestic and foreign, other than Asia/Pacific, borrowers, was not generally reflected in the level of nonperforming loans or in the internal risk grading process regarding these loans and leases. Accordingly, our evaluation of these probable losses is reflected in the unallocated allowance. The evaluations of these inherent losses are subject to higher degrees of uncertainty because they are not identified with specific problem credits. At December 31, 1997, our allowance for credit losses was $452 million, consisting of a: - $212 million formula allowance, - $68 million specific allowance and - $172 million unallocated allowance. This compares with an allowance for credit losses of $524 million at December 31, 1996, which consisted of a: - $237 million formula allowance, - $42 million specific allowance and - $245 million unallocated allowance. The decrease of $25 million in the formula allowance relates primarily to: - a reduction in the level of criticized loans, - the reflection of lower historical losses in the loss factors, which was partially offset by loan growth, - changes to conform the various risk grade definitions after the combi-nation of Bank of California and Union Bank and - the extension of the average annual net chargeoff rate for pass graded loans. The increase of $26 million in the specific allowance relates primarily to the reallocation for the Asian exposure described above. The unallocated allowance decreased by $73 million at December 31, 1997, because management believed that the inherent losses related to conditions considered in its evaluation of the unallocated allowance at December 31, 1996 had: - been recognized through charge-offs, - been reflected in the formula or specific allowance or - declined. From December 31, 1996 to December 31, 1997, there was no change in the component of the unallocated allowance related to the 20% to 25% margin for model and estimation risk prescribed by our credit policy. Included among those conditions that management believed gave rise to lower inherent losses at December 31, 1997 compared to December 31, 1996 were: 56 - reduced concerns regarding the lingering effects of the California recession on, and the sustainability of the recovery in, the California commercial real estate and construction market, - reduced concerns regarding consumer debt burdens and rising levels of consumer bankruptcies, - resolution of uncertainties related to assimilating data for the formula allowance that resulted from combining the loan portfolios of Bank of California and Union Bank and inconsistencies in the risk grading systems of UnionBanCal Corporation's predecessor banks, - reduced concerns related to consolidation and restructuring in the retail industry and - reduced concerns regarding the sustainability of perceived improvements in economic conditions. We do not weight the unallocated allowance among segments of the portfolio. In evaluating the appropriateness of the unallocated allowance at December 31, 1997, we considered, in addition to the factors described above: - the approximately $56 million to $70 million margin for model and estimation risk prescribed by our credit policy and - our estimate that the adverse impact of the Asian financial turmoil on us could be in the range of $100 million to $105 million. The following factors are reflected in management's estimate of the unallocated allowance at December 31, 1996: - the approximately $56 million to $70 million margin for model and estimation risk prescribed by our credit policy, - the lingering effects of the California recession on, and the sustainability of the recovery in, the California commercial real estate and construction market, which could be in the range of $45 million to $70 million, - the effects of consumer debt burdens and rising levels of consumer bankruptcies, which could be in the range of $25 million to $40 million, - the effects of uncertainties related to assimilating data for the formula allowance that resulted from combining the loan portfolios of Bank of California and Union Bank and inconsistencies in the risk grading systems of UnionBanCal Corporation's predecessor banks, which could be in the range of $15 million to $30 million, - the effects of consolidation and restructuring in the retail industry, which could be in the range of $5 million to $10 million and - the effects of adverse economic and business conditions in Japan, which could be in the range of $5 million to $10 million. We cannot assure you that the adverse impact of any of these conditions on us will not be in excess of the foregoing ranges. See "Forward Looking Statements" on page 14 for more information on risks and uncertainties affecting our estimates. NONPERFORMING ASSETS Nonperforming assets consist of nonaccrual loans, renegotiated loans, and foreclosed assets. Nonaccrual loans are those for which management has discontinued accrual of interest because there exists significant uncertainty as to the full and timely collection of either principal or interest or such loans have become contractually past due 90 days in the payment of principal or interest. For a more detailed discussion of the accounting for nonaccrual loans, see Note 1 to our Consolidated Financial Statements. 57 Renegotiated loans are those accruing loans for which, for reasons related to the borrower's financial difficulties, we have amended the terms of the original loan agreement and the borrower is performing according to the renegotiated terms. Foreclosed assets includes property where we acquired title through foreclosure or "deed in lieu" of foreclosure. On an ongoing basis, foreclosed asset values are reviewed and any decline in value is recognized as noninterest expense in the current period. The following table presents an analysis of nonperforming assets.
DECEMBER 31, ------------------------------------------------------------ 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 ------------ ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) Commercial, financial and industrial............... $ 145,907 $ 106,447 $ 84,336 $ 56,864 $ 46,392 Construction....................................... 231,148 73,643 40,026 7,349 4,071 Mortgage: Residential...................................... 61,809 17,020 19,220 11,214 954 Commercial....................................... 367,072 145,207 63,836 52,593 57,921 ------------ ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- Total mortgage................................. 428,881 162,227 83,056 63,807 58,875 Other.............................................. 7,288 7,285 849 247 -- Foreign(1)......................................... 3,331 -- -- -- -- ------------ ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- Total nonaccrual loans......................... 816,555 349,602 208,267 128,267 109,338 Renegotiated loans................................. 4,617 14,843 1,612 -- -- Nonperforming real estate ventures................. 23,256 -- -- -- -- Foreclosed assets.................................. 349,022 56,782 36,992 28,517 20,471 ------------ ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- Total nonperforming assets..................... $ 1,193,450 $ 421,227 $ 246,871 $ 156,784 $ 129,809 ------------ ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ------------ ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- Allowance for credit losses........................ $ 692,584 $ 563,142 $ 555,149 $ 523,946 $ 451,692 ------------ ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ------------ ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- Nonaccrual and renegotiated loans to total loans... 4.62% 2.02% 1.03% 0.61% 0.48% Nonaccrual loans to allowance for credit losses.... 117.90 62.08 37.52 24.48 24.21 Nonperforming assets to total loans, real estate ventures and foreclosed assets................... 6.58 2.32 1.21 0.74 0.57 Nonperforming assets to total assets............... 4.97 1.71 0.90 0.54 0.42
- --------- (1) Foreign loans are those loans originated in foreign branches. 58 The following table presents an analysis of loans contractually past due 90 days or more as to interest or principal, but not included in nonaccrual loans above.
DECEMBER 31, ----------------------------------------------------- 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) Commercial, financial and industrial....................... $ 12,116 $ 3,690 $ 3,752 $ 4,527 $ 450 Construction............................................... 10,711 5,735 1,063 -- -- Mortgage: Residential.............................................. 14,602 2,123 8,479 8,969 10,170 Commercial............................................... 35,071 -- 3,592 168 1,660 --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- Total mortgage......................................... 49,673 2,123 12,071 9,137 11,830 Consumer and other......................................... 8,481 8,573 8,854 10,028 7,712 --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- Total loans 90 days or more past due and still accruing.............................................. $ 80,981 $ 20,121 $ 25,740 $ 23,692 $ 19,992 --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
At December 31, 1997, nonaccrual loans totaled $109 million, a decrease of $19 million, or 15%, from year-end 1996. The decline was primarily attributable to a $10 million reduction in nonaccrual commercial, financial and industrial loans and a $10 million reduction in nonaccrual residential mortgage loans. The reduction in nonaccrual residential mortgage loans was partly due to a reclassification of particular loans from nonaccrual to 90-days past due and still accruing. The decline in nonaccrual loans was reflected in an improvement in the overall risk grades of the portfolio, which contributed to a reduction in the formula allowance. Foreclosed assets, primarily other real estate owned, decreased by $8 million due to sales of individual assets. Nonaccrual and renegotiated loans as a percentage of total loans were 0.48% at December 31, 1997 compared with 0.61% one year earlier. Nonperforming assets as a percentage of total loans, real estate ventures and foreclosed assets improved to 0.57% at year-end 1997 from 0.74% at December 31, 1996. At December 31, 1997, approximately 58% of nonaccrual loans were real estate related. Total loans 90 days or more past due and still accruing were $20 million at December 31, 1997 compared with $24 million at December 31, 1996. At December 31 1997, impaired loans were $108 million and the associated impairment allowance was $9 million compared with impaired loans of $114 million and the associated impairment allowance of $21 million at December 31, 1996. INTEREST FOREGONE Interest foregone during 1996 and 1997 for loans that were on nonaccrual status at December 31, 1996 was $9 million and at December 31, 1997 was $6 million. We recognized interest income during 1996 and 1997 for loans that were on nonaccrual status at December 31, 1996 of $5 million and at December 31, 1997 of $3 million. 59 SECURITIES The following tables summarize the composition of the securities portfolio and the gross unrealized gains and losses within the portfolio. SECURITIES AVAILABLE FOR SALE.
DECEMBER 31, --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1996 1997 1995 ---------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------- --------- GROSS GROSS GROSS GROSS FAIR AMORTIZED UNREALIZED UNREALIZED FAIR AMORTIZED UNREALIZED UNREALIZED FAIR VALUE COST GAINS LOSSES VALUE COST GAINS LOSSES VALUE --------- --------- ----------- ----------- --------- --------- ----------- ----------- --------- (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) U.S. Treasury..... $ 994,492 $1,137,992 $ 4,993 $ 1,933 $1,141,052 $ 987,374 $ 10,793 $ 170 $ 997,997 Other U.S. government...... 364,584 687,717 4,993 779 691,931 709,536 6,005 67 715,474 Mortgage-backed securities...... 448,173 193,531 400 274 193,657 679,692 3,331 265 682,758 State and municipal....... 132,698 101,006 13,749 -- 114,755 90,937 13,236 -- 104,173 Corporate debt securities...... -- -- -- -- -- 2,698 311 1 3,008 Equity securities...... 16,539 19,041 2,553 -- 21,594 28,881 1,596 672 29,805 Foreign securities...... 4,065 1,136 72 -- 1,208 5,132 39 -- 5,171 --------- --------- ----------- ----------- --------- --------- ----------- ----------- --------- Total securities available for sale........... $1,960,551 $2,140,423 $ 26,760 $ 2,986 $2,164,197 $2,504,250 $ 35,311 $ 1,175 $2,538,386 --------- --------- ----------- ----------- --------- --------- ----------- ----------- --------- --------- --------- ----------- ----------- --------- --------- ----------- ----------- ---------
SECURITIES HELD TO MATURITY.
DECEMBER 31, ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1996 1997 1995 ------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------- ----------- GROSS GROSS GROSS GROSS AMORTIZED AMORTIZED UNREALIZED UNREALIZED FAIR AMORTIZED UNREALIZED UNREALIZED COST COST GAINS LOSSES VALUE COST GAINS LOSSES ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- --------- ----------- ----------- ----------- (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) U.S. Treasury........ $ 51,125 $ 50,109 $ 1,735 $ -- $ 51,844 $ 40,092 $ 1,333 $ -- Other U.S. government......... 138,816 139,188 4,412 -- 143,600 99,520 2,568 -- Mortgage-backed securities......... 124,375 41,985 2,019 68 43,936 24,477 1,745 14 State and municipal.......... 48,971 36,914 310 2,199 35,025 24,686 75 1,367 ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- --------- ----------- ----------- ----------- Total securities held to maturity.......... $ 363,287 $ 268,196 $ 8,476 $ 2,267 $ 274,405 $ 188,775 $ 5,721 $ 1,381 ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- --------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- --------- ----------- ----------- ----------- FAIR VALUE --------- U.S. Treasury........ $ 41,425 Other U.S. government......... 102,088 Mortgage-backed securities......... 26,208 State and municipal.......... 23,394 --------- Total securities held to maturity.......... $ 193,115 --------- ---------
Management of the securities portfolio involves the maximization of return while maintaining prudent levels of quality and liquidity. At December 31, 1997, approximately 98 percent of total securities were investment grade. During the quarter ended December 31, 1995, in accordance with guidance issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board, we reclassified from securities held to maturity to securities available for sale approximately $285 million at amortized cost of U.S. Treasury Notes (fair value $285 million) and $64 million at amortized cost of municipal bonds (fair value $72 million). 60 ANALYSIS OF SECURITIES PORTFOLIO The following tables show the remaining contractual maturities and expected yields of the securities portfolio. SECURITIES AVAILABLE FOR SALE.
DECEMBER 31, 1997 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- MATURITY ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- AFTER ONE YEAR AND AFTER FIVE YEARS AND WITHIN WITHIN WITHIN AFTER TEN ONE YEAR FIVE YEARS TEN YEARS YEARS ---------------------- ---------------------- ------------------------ ----------- AMOUNT YIELD(4) AMOUNT YIELD(4) AMOUNT YIELD(4) AMOUNT --------- ----------- --------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- U.S. Treasury....................... $ 150,048 6.22% $ 837,326 6.31% $ -- -- % $ -- Other U.S. government............... 99,940 6.49 609,596 6.38 -- -- -- Mortgage-backed securities(1)....... 53,108 6.82 626,584 6.41 -- -- -- State and municipal(2).............. 14,944 10.49 26,409 9.90 12,971 11.09 36,613 Corporate debt securities........... -- -- 1,432 17.31 1,266 12.42 -- Equity securities(3)................ -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Foreign securities.................. 3,419 14.30 -- -- 1,713 6.29 -- --------- --------- ----------- ----------- Total securities available for sale........................... $ 321,459 6.69% $2,101,347 6.41% $ 15,950 10.68% $ 36,613 --------- --------- ----------- ----------- --------- --------- ----------- ----------- TOTAL AMORTIZED ---------------------- YIELD(4) AMOUNT YIELD(4) ----------- --------- ----------- U.S. Treasury....................... -- % $ 987,374 6.30% Other U.S. government............... -- 709,536 6.40 Mortgage-backed securities(1)....... -- 679,692 6.44 State and municipal(2).............. 11.33 90,937 10.74 Corporate debt securities........... -- 2,698 15.02 Equity securities(3)................ -- 28,881 -- Foreign securities.................. -- 5,132 11.63 --------- Total securities available for sale........................... 11.33% $2,504,250 6.48% --------- ---------
SECURITIES HELD TO MATURITY.
DECEMBER 31, 1997 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- MATURITY --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- AFTER ONE YEAR AND AFTER FIVE YEARS AND WITHIN WITHIN WITHIN AFTER TEN ONE YEAR FIVE YEARS TEN YEARS YEARS ------------------------ ---------------------- ------------------------ ----------- AMOUNT YIELD(4) AMOUNT YIELD(4) AMOUNT YIELD(4) AMOUNT ----------- ----------- --------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) U.S. Treasury.......................... $ -- -- % $ 40,092 7.56% $ -- -- % $ -- Other U.S. government.................. 10,000 8.00 89,520 7.72 -- -- -- Mortgage-backed securities(1).......... 3,622 4.88 20,855 9.03 -- -- -- State and municipal(2)................. 9,077 9.19 -- -- 2,596 6.35 13,013 ----------- --------- ----------- ----------- Total securities held to maturity.... $ 22,699 7.98% $ 150,467 7.86% $ 2,596 6.35% $ 13,013 ----------- --------- ----------- ----------- ----------- --------- ----------- ----------- TOTAL AMORTIZED ---------------------- YIELD(4) AMOUNT YIELD(4) ----------- --------- ----------- U.S. Treasury.......................... -- % $ 40,092 7.56% Other U.S. government.................. -- 99,520 7.75 Mortgage-backed securities(1).......... -- 24,477 8.42 State and municipal(2)................. 5.77 24,686 7.09 --------- Total securities held to maturity.... 5.77% $ 188,775 7.71% --------- ---------
- ------------ (1) Expected maturities may differ from contractual maturities because borrowers have the right to call or prepay obligations, with or without call or prepayment penalties. (2) Yields on tax-exempt municipal securities are presented on a taxable-equivalent basis using the current federal statutory rate of 35 percent. (3) Equity securities do not have a stated maturity and are included in the total column only. (4) Yields are based on amortized cost. 61 LOAN MATURITIES The following table presents our loans by maturity.
DECEMBER 31, 1997 -------------------------------------------------------- AFTER ONE YEAR WITHIN AND WITHIN AFTER ONE YEAR FIVE YEARS FIVE YEARS TOTAL ------------- ------------ ------------ ------------- (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) Domestic: Commercial, financial and industrial................. $ 4,102,910 $ 4,477,317 $ 2,166,952 $ 10,747,179 Construction......................................... 173,504 119,829 -- 293,333 Mortgage: Residential........................................ 4,230 32,000 2,925,003 2,961,233 Commercial......................................... 228,955 1,085,913 1,636,939 2,951,807 ------------- ------------ ------------ ------------- Total mortgage................................... 233,185 1,117,913 4,561,942 5,913,040 Consumer: Installment........................................ 136,264 1,801,620 152,868 2,090,752 Home equity........................................ 2,816 38,570 951,530 992,916 Credit card and other lines of credit.............. 270,045 52 -- 270,097 ------------- ------------ ------------ ------------- Total consumer................................... 409,125 1,840,242 1,104,398 3,353,765 Lease financing...................................... 83,478 606,904 184,478 874,860 ------------- ------------ ------------ ------------- Total loans in domestic offices.................. 5,002,202 8,162,205 8,017,770 21,182,177 Loans originated in foreign branches................... 1,515,844 25,627 17,760 1,559,231 ------------- ------------ ------------ ------------- Total loans...................................... $ 6,518,046 $ 8,187,832 $ 8,035,530 22,741,408 ------------- ------------ ------------ ------------- ------------ ------------ Allowance for credit losses.................... 451,692 ------------- Loans, net....................................... $ 22,289,716 ------------- ------------- Total fixed rate loans due after one year.............. $ 5,353,709 Total variable rate loans due after one year........... 10,869,653 ------------- Total loans due after one year................... $ 16,223,362 ------------- -------------
CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSIT OF $100,000 AND OVER The following table presents domestic certificates of deposit of $100,000 and over by maturity.
DECEMBER 31, 1997 -------------------- (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) Three months or less........................................................................ $ 2,684,438 Over three months through six months........................................................ 1,163,014 Over six months through twelve months....................................................... 261,739 Over twelve months.......................................................................... 154,948 ----------- Total domestic certificates of deposit of $100,000 and over............................. $ 4,264,139 ----------- -----------
We offer certificates of deposit of $100,000 and over at market rates of interest. Many of these certificates are issued to customers, both public and private, who have done business with us for an extended period. We expect that as these deposits become due, the majority will continue to be renewed at market rates of interest. Substantially all of our deposits in foreign branches are certificates of deposit of $100,000 and over and mature in less than one year. 62 BORROWED FUNDS The following table presents information on our borrowed funds, excluding subordinated capital notes.
DECEMBER 31, ---------------------------------------- 1995 1996 1997 ------------ ------------ ------------ (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) Federal funds purchased and securities sold under repurchase agreements with weighted average interest rates of 4.96% at December 31, 1995, 5.09% at December 31, 1996 and 5.38% at December 31, 1997............. $ 1,195,058 $ 1,322,654 $ 1,335,884 Commercial paper, with weighted average interest rates of 5.75% at December 31, 1995, 5.34% at December 31, 1996 and 5.64% at December 31, 1997.............................................................. 1,389,870 1,495,463 966,575 Other borrowed funds, with weighted average interest rates of 5.78% at December 31, 1995, 5.66% at December 31, 1996 and 6.23% at December 31, 1997.............................................................. 1,064,472 749,422 476,010 ------------ ------------ ------------ Total borrowed funds................................................ $ 3,649,400 $ 3,567,539 $ 2,778,469 ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ Federal funds purchased and securities sold under repurchase agreements: Maximum outstanding at any month end.................................. $ 1,517,999 $ 1,322,654 $ 1,575,930 Average balance during the year....................................... 1,384,762 933,433 1,097,707 Weighted average interest rate during the year........................ 5.70% 5.05% 5.33% Commercial paper: Maximum outstanding at any month end.................................. $ 1,591,712 $ 1,854,576 $ 1,876,135 Average balance during the year....................................... 1,448,739 1,620,087 1,637,070 Weighted average interest rate during the year........................ 5.98% 5.40% 5.49% Other borrowed funds: Maximum outstanding at any month end.................................. $ 1,319,444 $ 1,697,236 $ 851,694 Average balance during the year....................................... 731,759 1,119,051 635,900 Weighted average interest rate during the year........................ 5.82% 5.59% 5.42%
CAPITAL ADEQUACY AND DIVIDENDS Our principal capital objectives are to support future growth, to protect depositors, to absorb any unanticipated losses and to comply with various regulatory requirements. Management believes that we have retained our capital at a level which supports our risk structure, as well as providing for anticipated growth of current business activities and strategic expansion. Total shareholders' equity was $2,679 million at December 31, 1997, an increase of $184 million from year-end 1996. This change was primarily a result of $411 million of net income for 1997, offset by the redemption of $135 million in preferred stock and dividends on common and preferred stock of $97 million. We offer a dividend reinvestment plan that allows shareholders to reinvest dividends in our common stock at 5 percent below the market price. At December 31, 1997, The Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi was not a participant in the plan. Capital adequacy depends on a variety of factors including asset quality and risk profile, liquidity, stability of earnings, competitive and economic conditions, and management. We believe that the current level of profitability, coupled with a prudent dividend policy, is adequate to support normal growth in operations while meeting regulatory capital guidelines. 63 The following table summarizes our risk-based capital, risk-weighted assets, and risk-based capital ratios.
DECEMBER 31, MINIMUM ------------------------------------------------------------------------- REGULATORY 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 REQUIREMENT ------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) CAPITAL COMPONENTS: Tier 1 capital................. $ 1,952,045 $ 2,070,554 $ 2,355,057 $ 2,395,580 $ 2,587,071 Tier 2 capital................. 702,652 626,903 591,266 551,074 601,102 ------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- Total risk-based capital..... $ 2,654,697 $ 2,697,457 $ 2,946,323 $ 2,946,654 $ 3,188,173 ------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- Risk-weighted assets........... $ 21,992,647 $ 22,419,516 $ 25,179,489 $ 26,390,288 $ 28,862,340 ------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- Quarterly average assets....... $ 23,624,622 $ 23,868,729 $ 27,073,158 $ 28,496,355 $ 30,334,507 ------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- CAPITAL RATIOS: Total risk-based capital....... 12.07% 12.03% 11.70% 11.17% 11.05% 8.0% Tier 1 risk-based capital...... 8.88 9.24 9.35 9.08 8.96 4.0 Leverage ratio(1).............. 8.26 8.67 8.70 8.41 8.53 4.0
- --------- (1) Tier 1 capital divided by quarterly average assets, excluding goodwill. For regulatory purposes, our capital computations are based on risk-adjusted Tier 1 and total capital. Our Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio was 9.08% and our total risk-based capital ratio was 11.17% at December 31, 1996 compared to 8.96% for our Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio and 11.05% for our total risk-based capital ratio at December 31, 1997. The decrease in the capital ratios was attributable to the redemption of $135 million of preferred stock in the third quarter of 1997, partly offset by retained earnings growing faster than both risk-weighted assets and average assets. As of December 31, 1997, management believes the capital ratios of our bank met all regulatory minimums of a "well-capitalized" institution. YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996 COMPARED TO YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1995 Net income in 1996 was $249 million compared with $313 million in 1995. Excluding the effects of the $72 million after-tax charge for merger-integration expense, net income improved as a result of higher net interest income, higher noninterest income, and lower credit loss provision expense than in 1995. Net income applicable to common stock was $238 million, or $1.36 per diluted common share, in 1996 compared with $302 million, or $1.73 per diluted common share, in 1995. The return on average assets was 0.89% in 1996 versus 1.22% in 1995. The return on average common equity was 10.24% in 1996 compared with 13.73% in 1995. Net interest income on a taxable-equivalent basis increased by $23 million, or 2 percent, over 1995. Average loans increased $1,753 million, or 9 percent, and the net interest margin decreased 30 basis points to 4.75%. Noninterest income increased by $23 million, or 6 percent, over 1995. Service charges on deposits, trust and investment management fees, credit card merchant fees, brokerage commissions and fees, securities gains, and other revenue collectively grew 11 percent and accounted for $32 million of the growth in noninterest income. This increase was partially offset by a $6 million decrease in foreign exchange trading gains. The provision for credit losses was $40 million in 1996, $13 million, or 25 percent, lower than in 1995, reflecting the improved quality of the loan portfolio. 64 Noninterest expense, excluding merger and integration expense, increased by $39 million, or 4 percent, from 1995. Personnel-related expense increased $21 million, or 4 percent, due partially to increased contract labor used to augment staffing requirements as a residual effect of the merger. Net occupancy expense increased $10 million, or 11 percent, due to a $12 million one-time charge in 1996 related to former banking facilities. This was offset by a 2 percent decrease in net occupancy expense due to the closure of 20 branches late in the third quarter of 1996. Credit card processing expense increased $6 million, or 19 percent, in 1996 due to higher merchant volumes. Advertising and public relations expense increased $8 million, or 38 percent, over 1995 due primarily to expanded activities in 1996 to increase awareness of our bank, following the April 1, 1996 combination of Union Bank and BanCal Tri-State Corporation and its subsidiary. In 1996, regulatory authority assessments expense declined $19 million, or 83 percent, primarily because the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation decided to eliminate insurance assessments for all of 1996. Merger and integration expense was $117 million in 1996. Income tax expense was $30 million lower in 1996 than in 1995, primarily due to lower taxable income. The effective rate increased from 38% in 1995 to 40% in 1996 primarily due to a $3 million after-tax benefit recognized in 1995 from a favorable settlement of an Internal Revenue Service examination of 1989 and 1990. Total loans at December 31, 1996 were $21.0 billion, an increase of $0.6 billion, or 3 percent, over year-end 1995. Commercial, financial and industrial loans declined $188 million, or 2 percent, from the previous year, primarily due to planned reductions from a portfolio overlap arising from the merger and a reduction in low margin lending. At year-end 1996, construction loans decreased $12 million, or 3 percent, while commercial mortgages increased $455 million, or 21 percent, from 1995. This increase in commercial mortgages reflected the continuing improvement in the West Coast economy, particularly the real estate sector. It was primarily attributable to new originations of mini-perm loans, ranging in size from $1 million to $10 million, resulting from a vigorous marketing program. At December 31, 1996 residential loans were $319 million, or 12 percent, higher than the previous year as the favorable interest rate environment and a stronger housing market continued to generate significant opportunities for residential mortgage lenders. Consumer loans increased $136 million, or 4 percent, from 1995 due primarily to increases in direct and indirect auto loans for used vehicles, partially offset by a decrease in home equity balances. Total nonperforming assets were $157 million at December 31, 1996, $90 million, or 36 percent, lower than one year earlier. The decline was primarily attributable to a $27 million, or 33 percent, reduction in nonaccrual commercial, financial and industrial loans and a $33 million, or 82 percent, reduction in nonaccrual construction loans, due to a combination of note sales, payoffs, and upgrades. Foreclosed assets, primarily other real estate owned, decreased by $8 million, or 23 percent, from 1995, due to sales of individual assets. Net loan charge-offs in 1996 were $71 million compared to net loans charged off of $61 million in 1995. Recoveries of loans previously charged off decreased by $24 million, despite an increase in the percentage of recoveries in 1996 to loans charged off in the previous year from 26.44% in 1995 to 35.95% in 1996. Loans charged off in 1996 decreased by $14 million due to a reduction in new nonperforming assets in 1996 and a reduction in nonaccrual and underperforming loans, partly offset by a $12 million increase in consumer loans charged off, primarily attributable to credit card loans. At December 31, 1996, the Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio was 9.08% and the total risk-based capital ratio was 11.17% compared with a Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of 9.35% and a total risk-based capital ratio of 11.70% at December 31, 1995. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK GENERAL Market risk is the risk of loss to future earnings, to fair values, or to future cash flows that may result from changes in the price of a financial instrument. The value of a financial instrument may change as a result of changes in interest rates, foreign currency exchange rates, commodity prices, equity prices and 65 other market changes that affect market risk sensitive instruments. Market risk is attributed to all market risk sensitive financial instruments, including securities, loans, deposits, borrowings, as well as derivative instruments. Our exposure to market risk is a function of its asset and liability management activities, its trading activities for its own account, and its role as a financial intermediary in customer-related transactions. The objective of market risk management is to avoid excessive exposure of our earnings and equity to loss and to reduce the volatility inherent in financial instruments. The management of market risk is governed by policies reviewed and approved annually by our Board of Directors. Our Board of Directors delegates responsibility for market risk management to the Asset & Liability Management Committee (the "A&L Management Committee"), who reports quarterly to our Board of Directors on activities related to the management of market risk. As part of the management of our market risk, the A&L Management Committee may direct changes in the mix of assets and liabilities and the use of derivative instruments such as interest rate swaps, caps and floors. The A&L Management Committee also reviews and approves all major funding, market risk-management programs, and market risk limits. The Chief Financial Officer, as chairman of the A&L Management Committee, is responsible for companywide management of market risk. The Treasurer is responsible for implementing funding, investment, and hedging strategies designed to manage this risk. On a day-to-day basis, the oversight of market risk management takes place at a centralized level within the Risk Monitoring Unit. The Risk Monitoring Unit is responsible for measuring risks to ensure compliance with all market risk limits and guidelines incorporated within the policies and procedures established by the A&L Management Committee. The Risk Monitoring Unit reports monthly to the A&L Management Committee on the effectiveness of our hedging activities, on trading risk exposures, and on compliance with policy limits. In addition, periodic reviews by internal audit, regulators and independent accountants provide further evaluation of controls over the risk management process. We have separate and distinct methods for managing the market risk associated with our trading activities and our asset and liability management activities, as described below. INTEREST RATE RISK MANAGEMENT (OTHER THAN TRADING) We engage in asset and liability management activities with the objective of reducing adverse changes in earnings as a result of changes in interest rates. The management of interest rate risk relates to the timing and magnitude of the repricing of assets compared to liabilities and has, as its objective, the control of risks associated with movements in interest rates. The Asset & Liability Management Policy approved by our Board of Directors requires monthly monitoring of interest rate risk by the A&L Management Committee. As part of the management of our interest rate risk, the A&L Management Committee may direct changes in the composition of the balance sheet and the extent to which we utilize off-balance sheet derivative instruments such as interest rate swaps, floors, and caps. Our balance sheet is "asset-sensitive", which means that assets generally reprice more quickly than liabilities. An asset-sensitive balance sheet tends to reduce net interest income when interest rates decline and to increase net interest income when interest rates rise. One method of measuring interest rate risk is by measuring the interest rate sensitivity gap, which is the difference between earning assets and liabilities maturing or repricing within specified periods. The table on page 69 presents such an analysis, which reflects assumptions as to the rate sensitivity of deposits without contractual maturities or repricing dates. These include demand deposits, money market demand accounts, and savings deposits. Additional assumptions such as prepayment estimates for residential mortgages and mortgage-backed securities are made to reflect the probable behavior of those assets. The section of the table on page 69 entitled "Interest Rate Risk Management Positions" presents the effects of the securities portfolio and of derivatives used for hedging, such as interest rate swaps and floors, in reducing the interest rate sensitivity gap primarily for LIBOR-based loans. 66 The table on page 69 shows that our assets that are rate sensitive within one year exceeded liabilities within that same period by $4.9 billion at December 31, 1997. Adjusted for the effects of the securities portfolio and derivatives used for hedging, this cumulative gap was reduced to $2.5 billion. Gap analysis has significant limitations as a method for measuring interest rate risk since changes in interest rates do not affect all categories of assets and liabilities in the same way. To address these limitations, we use a simulation model to quantify the impact of changing interest rates on net interest income. A frequency distribution of simulated 12-month net interest income outcomes based on rate scenarios produced through a Monte Carlo rate generation process is prepared monthly to determine statistically the mean net interest income. The amount of Earnings at Risk, defined as the potential negative change in net interest income, is measured at a 97.5 percent confidence level and is managed within the limit established in our Board of Director's Asset & Liability Policy at 5 percent of mean net interest income. Based on the December 31, 1997 balance sheet, the Earnings at Risk was $23.0 million or 1.80% of mean net interest income. An additional limit established by our Board of Director's Asset & Liability Policy is that the negative change in simulated net interest income for 12 months under single interest rate shock scenarios, up or down 200 basis points, must be no more than 8 percent of the mean net interest income. Based on the December 31, 1997 balance sheet, the negative change for a downward shock of 200 basis points was $51.8 million or 4.05% of mean net interest income. TRADING ACTIVITIES We enter into trading account activities primarily as a financial intermediary for customers, and, to a lesser extent, for our own account. By acting as a financial intermediary, we are able to provide our customers with access to a wide range of products from the securities, foreign exchange, and derivatives markets. In acting for our own account, we may take positions in some of these instruments with the objective of generating trading profits. These activities expose us to two primary types of market risk: interest rate and foreign currency exchange risk. In order to manage interest rate and foreign currency exchange risk associated with our trading activities, we use a variety of non-statistical methods including: position limits for each trading activity, daily marking of all positions to market, daily profit and loss statements, position reports, and independent verification of all inventory pricing. Additionally, the Risk Management Unit reports positions and profits and losses daily to the Treasurer and trading managers and weekly to the Chief Financial Officer. The A&L Management Committee is provided reports on a monthly basis. We believe that these procedures, which stress timely communication between the Risk Management Unit and senior management, are the most important elements of the risk management process. We use a form of Value at Risk methodology to measure the overall market risk inherent in our trading account activities. Under this methodology, management statistically calculates, with 97.5 percent confidence, the potential loss in fair value that we might experience if an adverse shift in market prices were to occur within a period of 5 business days. The amount of Value at Risk is managed within limits well below the maximum limit established by Board policy at 0.5% of shareholders' equity. The Value at Risk model incorporates a number of key assumptions, including assumed holding period and historical volatility based on 3 years of historical market data updated quarterly. During 1997, our foreign exchange trading Value at Risk averaged $73 thousand and peaked at $147 thousand. The low Value at Risk was $32 thousand. Correspondingly, our securities trading Value at Risk averaged $558 thousand and peaked at $717 thousand. The low Value at Risk was $439 thousand. 67 Our interest rate derivatives contracts include $2.4 billion of derivative contracts entered into as an accommodation for customers. We act as an intermediary and we match these contracts at a profit with contracts with The Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi or other dealers, thus neutralizing the related market risk. We maintain responsibility for the credit risk associated with these contracts. LIQUIDITY RISK Liquidity risk represents the potential for loss as a result of limitations on our ability to adjust its future cash flows to meet the needs of depositors and borrowers and to fund operations on a timely and cost-effective basis. The Asset & Liability Management Policy approved by our Board of Directors requires quarterly reviews of our liquidity by the A&L Management Committee, which is composed of bank senior executives. Our liquidity draws upon the strength of our extensive retail and commercial market business franchise, coupled with the ability to obtain funds for various terms in a variety of domestic and international money markets. Liquidity is managed through the funding and investment functions of the Treasury Division. Core deposits provide us with a sizable source of relatively stable and low-cost funds. In the third quarter of 1998, lower cost sources of funds, which include noninterest bearing deposits and interest bearing core deposits, funded 63 percent of average earning assets. Most of the remaining funding was provided by short-term borrowing in the form of negotiable certificates of deposit, foreign deposits, federal funds purchased and securities sold under repurchase agreements, and other borrowings. In the third quarter 1998, we increased our commercial paper program by $100 million. Our average core deposits, which include demand deposits, money market demand accounts, and savings and consumer time deposits, combined with average common shareholder's equity, funded 61 percent of average total assets of $29.7 billion for the year ended December 31, 1997. Most of the remaining funding was provided by short-term borrowings in the form of negotiable certificates of deposit, foreign deposits, federal funds purchased and securities sold under repurchase agreements, commercial paper and other borrowings. Liquidity may also be provided by the sale or maturity of assets. Such assets include interest bearing deposits in banks, federal funds sold and securities purchased under resale agreements, and trading account securities. The aggregate of these assets averaged $1.8 billion during 1997. Additional liquidity may be provided by investment securities available for sale which amounted to $2.5 billion at December 31, 1997, and by loan maturities. At December 31, 1997, $6.5 billion of loans were scheduled to mature within one year. 68 The following table summarizes our interest rate sensitivity based on expected repricings in the time frames indicated for the balance sheet and interest rate derivatives as of December 31, 1997.
DECEMBER 31, 1997 ---------------------------------------------------------- AMOUNTS MATURING OR REPRICING IN ---------------------------------------------------------- 0-12 MONTHS 1-5 YEARS AFTER 5 YEARS TOTAL ------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) ASSETS: Federal funds sold and securities purchased under resale agreements................................. $ 24,335 $ -- $ -- $ 24,335 Interest bearing deposits in banks................. 633,421 -- -- 633,421 Trading account assets............................. 394,313 -- -- 394,313 Loans.............................................. 17,320,010 3,926,152 1,495,246 22,741,408 Other assets(1)(2)................................. 1,217,060 1,111,518 1,736,049 4,064,627 ------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- Total assets (except securities)............... $ 19,589,139 $ 5,037,670 $ 3,231,295 $ 27,858,104 ------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY: Interest bearing deposits: Interest bearing checking(1)(3).................. 180,074 1,260,520 -- 1,440,594 Money market demand accounts(1)(3)............... 1,353,636 2,671,392 -- 4,025,028 Savings(1)(3).................................... 166,562 1,165,932 -- 1,332,494 Other time deposits(1)........................... 7,208,342 434,309 6,063 7,648,714 Federal funds purchased and securities sold under repurchase agreements............................. 1,335,884 -- -- 1,335,884 Other borrowed funds............................... 1,442,585 -- -- 1,442,585 Subordinated capital notes......................... 348,000 -- -- 348,000 Demand deposit accounts(1)(4)...................... 2,654,863 6,194,681 -- 8,849,544 Other liabilities(1)(2)............................ -- -- 1,483,123 1,483,123 Shareholders' equity(2)............................ -- -- 2,679,299 2,679,299 ------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- Total liabilities and shareholders' equity..... $ 14,689,946 $ 11,726,834 $ 4,168,485 $ 30,585,265 ------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- Gap before risk management positions............... $ 4,899,193 $ (6,689,164) $ (937,190) $ (2,727,161) Cumulative gap before risk management positions.... $ 4,899,193 $ (1,789,971) $ (2,727,161) INTEREST RATE RISK MANAGEMENT POSITIONS: Securities(1)...................................... 366,467 2,214,199 146,495 2,727,161 Interest rate swaps................................ (425,000) 425,000 -- -- Interest rate floors(5)............................ (2,350,000) 2,350,000 -- -- ------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- Gap adjusted for risk management positions......... $ 2,490,660 $ (1,699,965) $ (790,695) $ -- ------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- Cumulative gap adjusted for risk management positions......................................... $ 2,490,660 $ 790,695 $ -- $ -- ------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- -------------
- --------- (1) These balance sheet classifications do not conform to the classifications on the Consolidated Balance Sheets on F-3. (2) Items that neither reprice nor mature are included in the "After 5 Years" column. (3) Interest rate sensitivity of non-maturity deposit accounts are based on assumptions for a declining interest rate scenario since our balance sheet is asset-sensitive. (4) 70 percent of the demand deposit account balance is assumed to be "core" deposits, which are not sensitive to interest rate changes. (5) Floors purchased affect interest rate sensitivity in a declining interest rate scenario. 69 YEAR 2000 The year 2000 problem exists because many computer programs use only the last two digits to refer to a year. This convention could affect date-sensitive calculations that treat "00" as the year 1900, rather than as the year 2000. Another issue is that the year 2000 is a leap year and some programs may not properly provide for February 29, 2000. This discussion of the implications of the year 2000 problem for us contains numerous forward-looking statements based on inherently uncertain information. The cost of the project and the date on which we plan to complete the internal year 2000 modifications are based on management's best estimates of future events. The material assumptions underlying the estimated cost are: - the continued availability of internal and external resources, - the cost of these resources, - the time required to accomplish the tasks, and - the cost of needed equipment. We cannot guarantee, however, that we will achieve these estimates, and actual results could differ. Moreover, although management believes it will be able to make the necessary modifications in advance, failure to modify the systems may have a material adverse effect on us. In addition, we place a high degree of reliance on computer systems of third parties, such as customers, vendors, and other financial and governmental institutions. Although we are assessing the readiness of these third parties and preparing contingency plans, the failure of these third parties to modify their systems in advance of December 31, 1999, may have a material adverse effect on us. We estimate that the total cost of our year 2000 project will be approximately $50 million, of which $10 million relates to capital expenditures that we will capitalize and depreciate over their useful lives. We will include the remaining $40 million in noninterest expense in the period incurred. As of December 31, 1998, we had spent $24 million on our year 2000 project, $2 million in 1997 and $22 million in 1998. Of the $24 million spent as of December 31, 1998, $6 million related to capital expenditures, $1 million in 1997 and $5 million in 1998. Of the estimated $26 million remaining to be spent, an estimated $4 million is expected to be for capital expenditures and $22 million is expected to be included in noninterest expense over the next two years. Of the $22 million to be included in noninterest expense, we have assumed that approximately $14 million will be spent on salaries and contract labor. This assumes that the current mix of internal staff and contract labor remains the same, the hours and the person-days needed to complete the projects are not materially exceeded and that preparations for the year 2000 remain on schedule. The remaining $8 million is expected to relate to other operating expenses. We are funding the cost of our year 2000 project with normal operating cash and are staffing it with external resources as well as internal staff re-deployed from less time-sensitive assignments. Estimated total cost could change further as analysis continues. READINESS PREPARATION Resolution of the year 2000 problem is among our highest priorities, and we are preparing for the century change with a comprehensive enterprise-wide year 2000 program. We have identified all of the major systems and have sought external and internal resources to renovate and test the systems. We are testing purchased software, internally developed systems and systems supported by external parties as part of the program. We are evaluating customers and vendors that have significant relationships with us to determine whether they are adequately preparing for the year 2000. In addition, we are developing contingency plans to reduce the impact of some potential events that may occur. We cannot guarantee, however, that the systems of vendors or customers with whom we do business will be completed on a timely basis, or that contingency plans will shield operations from failures that may occur. 70 Our year 2000 program is comprised of numerous individual projects that address the following broad areas: - data processing systems, - telecommunications and data networks, - building facilities and security systems, - vendor risk, - customer risk, - contingency planning, and - communications. We have identified over 2,000 individual projects. The projects vary in size, importance and materiality, from large undertakings, such as remediating complicated data systems, to smaller, but still important projects, such as installing compliant computer utility systems or assuring that building equipment will perform properly. The program continues to evolve as we identify new projects to keep up with increased understanding of year 2000 implications and evolving external requirements. Virtually all of the projects currently identified have begun, and approximately two-thirds have been completed. We assign projects a priority, indicating the importance of the function to our continuing operation. This prioritization facilitates reporting on projects based on their relative importance. We have prioritized projects as "Critical" and "Non-Critical." Critical projects are further prioritized as "Mission Critical" and "Other Critical." Mission Critical projects are defined as: - systems vital to the continuance of a broad core business activity; - functions, the interruption of which for longer than 3 days would threaten our viability; or - functions that provide the environment and infrastructure necessary to continue the broad core business activities. Other Critical projects are defined as: - other customer and accounting systems; - functions supporting delivery of information and service to customers; - administrative systems, the interruption of which for longer than 2 weeks would cause severe business impact; or - functions that provide the environment and infrastructure necessary for delivery of the above systems and functions. We plan to complete all projects currently identified prior to the year 2000, with special emphasis placed on those prioritized as Mission Critical or Other Critical. Failure to complete an Other Critical project would not necessarily have a material adverse effect on us. The most important projects are the Mission Critical application systems upon which we rely for our principal business functions. We have renovated and tested all of these systems. However, outside servicers operate three of them. The outside servicers have renovated and tested each of these systems, but we still need to validate them. The following table presents actual and estimated progress with Mission Critical projects. 71 MISSION CRITICAL APPLICATION COMPLETION
% COMPLETED: ----------------- Actual: June 1998.................................................................... 10% September 1998............................................................... 38 December 1998................................................................ 90 Estimated: March 1999................................................................... 100%
We have also achieved substantial progress with systems prioritized as Other Critical. As of December 31, 1998, 63% of these systems were complete. Substantially all are expected to be complete by March 31, 1999. In addition to testing individual systems, we have begun integrated contingency testing of our Mission Critical and many other systems in a separate computer environment where dates are set forward in order to identify and correct problems that might not otherwise become evident until the actual end of the century. We do not significantly rely on "embedded technology" in our critical processes. Embedded technology, which means microprocessor-controlled devices as opposed to multi-purpose computers, does control some building security and operations, such as power management, ventilation, and building access. All building facilities are presently being evaluated, and we expect all systems using embedded technology to be confirmed as year 2000 ready by June 1999. We rely on vendors and customers, and we are addressing year 2000 issues with both groups. We have identified over 300 vendors and have made inquiries about their year 2000 readiness plans and status. Approximately 35% of these vendors are rated as critical. We have completed risk assessments on the critical and non-critical vendors, and we are undertaking appropriate measures to minimize risk as much as possible for those vendors that we have assigned a risk rating of medium or high. Among the critical vendors, presently 72% are rated as low risk, 19% as medium risk, and 9% as high risk. We plan to have the medium and high risk vendor situations resolved in June 1999. We have, however, no viable alternatives for some suppliers, such as power distribution and local telephone companies. We are still evaluating these companies, and we will use the results as information for system-wide contingency planning. As with all financial institutions, we place a high degree of reliance on the systems of other institutions, including governmental agencies, to settle transactions. We will test principal settlement methods associated with major payment systems as part of their associated system projects. We also rely on our customers to make necessary preparations for the year 2000 so that their business operations will not be interrupted, thus threatening their ability to honor their financial commitments. We have identified over 2,500 borrowers, capital market counterparties, funding sources, and large depositors that constitute our customers as having financial volumes sufficiently large to warrant our inquiry and assessment of their year 2000 preparation. The financial volumes included loans and unused commitments, collected deposit balances, automated clearing house transactions, foreign exchange, and derivatives. We have completed inquiries and initial written assessments for 97% of the identified financial volumes. Our borrowers, the population of customers with loans and unused commitments outstanding, pose the highest level of concern. As of December 31, 1998, our assessment of these borrowers resulted in the following assignments of risk: 79% low risk, 18% medium risk and 3% high risk. We have established individual risk mitigation plans for substantially all of the customers rated as high risk. The risk mitigation plans evaluate whether year 2000 issues will materially affect the customer's cash flow, asset values, and collateral pledged to us. The risk mitigation plans use the normal credit process that we employ to manage credit risk and require the concurrence of a credit administrator. 72 We will make ongoing assessments of customers at all levels of risk. Those with low risk will be reassessed semi-annually, while customers with medium and high risk will be reassessed quarterly. RISKS The principal risks associated with the year 2000 problem can be grouped into three categories: - we do not successfully ready our operations for the next century, - disruption of our operations due to operational failures of third parties, and - business interruption among fund providers and obligors such that expected funding and repayment does not take place. The only risk largely under our control is preparing our internal operations for the year 2000. We, like other financial institutions, are heavily dependent on our computer systems. The complexity of these systems and their interdependence make it impractical to convert to alternative systems without interruptions if necessary modifications are not completed on schedule. Management believes we will be able to make the necessary modifications on schedule. Failure of third parties may jeopardize our operations, but the seriousness of this risk depends on the nature and duration of the failures. The most serious impact on our operations from vendors would result if basic services such as telecommunications, electric power, and services provided by other financial institutions and governmental agencies were disrupted. Some public disclosure about readiness preparation among basic infrastructure and other suppliers is now available. We are unable, however, to estimate the likelihood of significant disruptions among our basic infrastructure suppliers. In view of the unknown probability of occurrence and impact on operations, we consider the loss of basic infrastructure services to be the most reasonably likely worst case year 2000 scenario. Operational failures among our customers could affect their ability to continue to provide funding or meet obligations when due. The information we develop in the customer assessments described earlier allows us to identify those customers that exhibit a risk of not making adequate preparations for the century change. We are taking appropriate actions to manage these risks. PROGRAM ASSESSMENT Our Year 2000 Program Office reports on progress monthly to our Executive Management Committee and quarterly to the Audit and Examination Committee of our Board of Directors. Our Internal Audit Division and the National Bank Examiners regularly assess our year 2000 preparations and report quarterly to the Audit and Examination Committee. CONTINGENCY PLANS We are developing year 2000 remediation contingency plans and business resumption contingency plans specific to the year 2000. Remediation contingency plans address the actions we would take if the current approach to remediating a system is falling behind schedule or otherwise appears in jeopardy of failing to deliver a year 2000-ready system when needed. Business resumption contingency plans address the actions that we would take if critical business functions cannot be carried out in the normal manner upon entering the next century due to system or supplier failure. 73 Our business resumption contingency planning is following a four-phase process: - Organizational Planning Guidelines, - Business Impact Analysis, - Plan Development and - Validation of Plans. During the first two phases, which have been completed, we assigned responsibilities, specified scenarios and determined which scenarios were significant for each critical business unit. The second two phases call for the development of plans to meet the significant scenarios and testing the effectiveness of the plans. We are developing plans for system-wide or regional failures and for individual critical operating units where necessary. We expect to complete development of plans for the operating units and their validation in June 1999. We expect to complete development of plans to address system-wide or regional failures, and their validation, in September 1999. To determine where plans are necessary for individual operating units, we identified the following areas of concern, assigned to each a level of potential risk and a probability of occurrence. The areas of concern are: - telecommunications or data network outage, - enterprise information systems failure, - operational disruptions, - vendor or service provider failure, - staff unavailability, - utility or facility failure, and - personal computer or local area network failure. We rated the level of potential risk as high, moderate or low, and we rated the probability of occurrence as high, moderate or low. Critical operating units with a low or moderate level of potential risk and a low probability of occurrence do not require a contingency plan for the area of concern. For any other combination, the development of a contingency plan is required. OTHER RELATED DISCLOSURES HighMark Capital Management, Inc. is a registered investment adviser and UBOC Investment Services, Inc. is a broker-dealer. Each of these subsidiaries makes publicly available separate year 2000 reports. You can find additional year 2000 information in those reports. EURO CONVERSION On January 1, 1999, 11 European countries who joined the Economic and Monetary Union transitioned into a single currency called the "Euro", and a single central bank -- the European Central Bank. On that date, the exchange rates of the national currencies of the 11 countries were fixed and all financial transactions will be settled in Euros. We have completed our analysis of the bank-wide impact and have implemented a project plan that addresses the Euro conversion. We are now fully operational to settle transactions in the Euro. 74 BUSINESS We are a California-based bank holding company. Our principal subsidiary is Union Bank of California, N.A. Union Bank of California is: - the third largest commercial bank in California, based on both total assets and total deposits in California, - one of the 30 largest banks in the United States, and - one of the oldest banks on the West Coast. At September 30, 1998, we had: - 244 full-service branches in California, - 6 full-service branches in Oregon and Washington, - 2 facilities in Texas and New York, and - 18 offices abroad. Our bank was formed through the combination of Union Bank and BanCal Tri-State Corporation in 1996. We are presently approximately 82% owned by The Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi. We provide a wide range of financial products and services to retail customers, small businesses, middle-market companies and large corporations. Most of our customers are located in California, the nation's most populous state with over 32 million residents. As of September 30, 1998, we had total assets of $31.4 billion, total deposits of $23.7 billion and total shareholders' equity of $3.0 billion. We had net income for the nine months ended September 30, 1998 of $352.4 million, and net income per diluted common share of $2.01. BANKING SERVICES Our operations are divided into four primary segments: - Community Banking Group, - Commercial Financial Services Group, - Trust and Private Financial Services Group, and - International Banking Group. As used in the tables on the following pages, "performance center earnings" represent the allocation of net interest income, noninterest income and noninterest expense between the business segments for products and services originated in one segment but managed by another. "Total loans" and "total deposits" represent loans and deposits for each business segment before allocation between the segments of loans and deposits originated in one segment but managed by another. "Net interest income" and "income before income taxes" are presented on a taxable-equivalent basis. 75 COMMUNITY BANKING GROUP The following table presents the historical results of operations for the Community Banking Group:
COMMUNITY BANKING GROUP ---------------------------------------------- YEAR ENDED NINE MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 31, SEPTEMBER 30, ---------------------- ---------------------- 1996 1997 1997 1998 ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- RESULTS OF OPERATIONS: (IN THOUSANDS) Net interest income...................................... $ 658,144 $ 682,782 $ 511,212 $ 504,709 Noninterest income....................................... 133,559 142,944 105,991 136,101 ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- Total.................................................... 791,703 825,726 617,203 640,810 Noninterest expense...................................... 577,655 568,031 419,050 439,927 Credit expense (income).................................. 35,644 57,870 40,975 (3,059) Performance center earnings.............................. 7,688 10,040 6,558 6,403 Income before income taxes............................... 186,092 209,865 163,736 210,345 BALANCE SHEET DATA (PERIOD AVERAGE): (IN MILLIONS) Total loans before performance centers................... $ 9,877 $ 9,672 $ 9,691 $ 9,389 Total assets............................................. 10,911 10,626 10,632 10,329 Total deposits before performance centers................ 11,131 11,757 11,646 12,322 OTHER DATA:................................................ Return on average assets................................. 1.02% 1.17% 1.23% 1.63% Efficiency ratio......................................... 73.96 68.79 67.90 68.65
The Community Banking Group provides its customers with a full line of checking and savings, investment, loan and fee-based banking products. For the nine months ended September 30, 1998, average assets in this group were $10.3 billion, and average deposits were $12.3 billion. The group focuses on four major markets: - consumers - businesses with sales under $3 million - businesses with sales between $3 million and $20 million - middle-market companies, including agricultural firms, in central California and in selected parts of Oregon and Washington Community Banking serves over one million consumer households and businesses through its 244 branches in California, six branches in Oregon and Washington and its network of over 380 proprietary ATMs. Customers may also access our services 24 hours a day by telephone or personal computer. In addition, Community Banking offers automated teller and point-of-sale debit services through our founding membership in the Star System, the largest shared ATM network in the Western United States. The group is organized by service delivery method, by markets and by geography. The primary sub-units of the group are: - community banking branches, which serve consumers, businesses and affluent individuals - business banking centers, which serve businesses with sales between $3 million and $20 million - in-store branches, which also serve consumers and businesses 76 - middle market and agricultural lending offices - the Consumer Asset Management division, which is responsible for indirect auto finance, auto leasing, and residential real estate lending Through alliances with other financial institutions, the group offers additional products and services, such as credit cards, leasing and financing based on accounts receivable, inventory or other short-term assets. Community Banking competes with larger banks by providing service quality superior to that of its major competitors. We are recognized as among the highest rated banks in California for customer service quality and satisfaction. The group's primary means of competing with community banks include its large and convenient branch network and its reputation for innovative use of technology to deliver banking services. We have the fifth largest branch network among depository institutions in California. We also offer convenient banking hours to consumers through our drive-through banking locations and selected branches that are open seven days a week. Community Banking continues to enhance its customer service through the innovative use of technology. We were among the first banks to team with Intuit and Microsoft in the launches of their personal financial management software products, Quicken-Registered Trademark- and Money-Registered Trademark- for on-line banking. In 1996, we joined America Online's Banking Center as a charter member. We also worked with Sony to develop the first interactive video banking application of its kind on the West Coast. In December 1998, we jointly announced with IBM the first of its kind comprehensive on-line banking system using Lotus Notes-Registered Trademark- and Domino-Registered Trademark-. These services and enhancements have enabled us to increase our share of the consumer and small business markets. From June 30, 1994 to June 30, 1998, UnionBanCal Corporation's share of the California deposit market increased from 4.0% to 5.1%, representing an annual growth rate of 6.3%. Similarly, since April 1996, Community Banking has increased the number of households it serves by approximately 5% annually. The group's strategies include continuing to build upon the more than one million households and businesses it serves and broadening the range of financial products and services it provides to existing customers. The group uses direct mail marketing methods targeted at specific consumers to supplement its traditional mass media advertising. We are also introducing a new computer-driven sales system designed to foster cross-selling of our products. The new system uses improved software to prompt sales staff to offer customers additional products and services, based on a customer profile. We have installed the new system in 40 of our branches, and we anticipate full implementation within 18 months. The group will continue to use varied pricing strategies to encourage customers to use lower-cost methods of delivery to receive our products and services. Community Banking is emphasizing further development of existing lower-cost product and service delivery methods, such as the Internet, video kiosks and loans-by-phone, and is expanding its Direct Banking Center, which offers products, services and technical support for home banking via the telephone and computer. Community Banking competes with a number of commercial banks, savings associations and credit unions, as well as more specialized financial services providers, such as investment brokerage companies, consumer finance companies, and residential real estate lenders. The group's primary competitors are other major depository institutions such as Bank of America, California Federal, Washington Mutual and Wells Fargo, as well as smaller community banks in the markets in which we operate. 77 COMMERCIAL FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP The following table presents the historical results of operations for the Commercial Financial Services Group:
COMMERCIAL FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP ---------------------------------------------- YEAR ENDED NINE MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 31, SEPTEMBER 30, ---------------------- ---------------------- 1996 1997 1997 1998 ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- RESULTS OF OPERATIONS: (IN THOUSANDS) Net interest income...................................... $ 401,912 $ 440,804 $ 321,600 $ 360,625 Noninterest income....................................... 78,238 100,316 75,450 82,638 ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- Total.................................................... 480,150 541,120 397,050 443,263 Noninterest expense...................................... 201,870 231,906 166,305 188,328 Credit expense (income).................................. 14,362 18,872 15,065 15,963 Performance center earnings.............................. 4,141 3,926 2,968 2,037 Income before income taxes............................... 268,059 294,268 218,648 241,009 BALANCE SHEET DATA (PERIOD AVERAGE): (IN MILLIONS) Total loans before performance centers................... $ 8,292 $ 9,336 $ 9,178 $ 10,783 Total assets............................................. 9,287 10,513 10,344 12,005 Total deposits before performance centers................ 3,959 4,875 4,684 5,844 OTHER DATA:................................................ Return on average assets................................. 1.72% 1.65% 1.69% 1.63% Efficiency ratio......................................... 42.04 42.86 41.89 42.49
The Commercial Financial Services Group offers a variety of commercial financial services, including: - commercial and project loans, - real estate financing, - commercial financing based on accounts receivable, inventory, or other short term assets, - trade finance, which is the short-term extension of credit to support export/import transactions, including letters of credit, - lease financing, - customized cash management services, and - selected capital markets products. The group's customers provide a significant source of opportunities for us to sell products and services of other units of the bank, including treasury, trust, and retail banking services. For the nine months ended September 30, 1998, average assets in this group were $12.0 billion, and average deposits were $5.8 billion. Commercial Financial Services is divided into the following business units, which serve specific markets and industries: - The Commercial Banking Group, which serves California middle-market companies and larger companies most often headquartered in the Western United States; - The Real Estate Industries Group, which serves real estate developers and real estate investment trusts; 78 - The Specialized Lending Group, which serves companies operating in various industries, including oil and gas, utilities, media, communications, healthcare, finance and retailing; and - The Institutional and Deposit Markets Group, which serves title and escrow companies, financial institutions, retailers, bankruptcy trustees and other customers with large pools of deposits. The Commercial Customer Service Unit supports these business units by providing centralized customer service support. The group competes with other banks primarily on the basis of its reputation as a "business bank," the quality of its relationship managers, and the delivery of superior customer service. We are recognized in California as having a superior "business banking" reputation relative to other large banks. We are also rated among the highest for our cash management services and systems. Commercial Financial Services relationship managers are among the most experienced in the industries that we target, and are trained to be consultative advisers to our customers. The group's main strategy is to target industries and companies for which the group can reasonably expect to be one of a customer's primary banks. Consistent with its strategy, the group attempts to serve a large part of its targeted customers' credit and depository needs. One result of this strategy is increased loan syndication activity. The group has successfully increased noninterest revenue by expanding its loan syndication activities, and it plans to continue to emphasize its operations in this area. Loan syndication revenues increased by $6.2 million to $12.6 million through the first nine months of 1998 compared to $6.4 million in 1996. This increase is largely a result of our acting more frequently as agent and/or underwriter in syndicated loans to middle-market, real estate, and Specialized Lending Group customers. We believe that an additional source of increased noninterest income will come from our expanded participation in capital market transactions. As of September 30, 1998, UnionBanCal Corporation had approximately $58 million committed to a private capital investment program, with plans to expand our investments in 1999. Commercial Financial Services generally makes investments in funds and companies with proven operating histories and in industries in which the group specializes. We will seek to earn more fee income from loan securitizations, particularly from commercial mortgages. As the group increasingly allocates its resources to those industries and companies that fit its strategy, it will simultaneously de-emphasize efforts to build banking relationships with companies outside of its target markets. We expect to move away from junior syndicate roles in the market for large corporate credits and toward the purchase of selected credits from the secondary market for bank loans. In addition, Commercial Financial Services intends to use improved technology to enhance the efficiency of its operations and the productivity of its bankers and support staff. Among its planned system improvements are enhancements to loan automation technology, improved software to measure customer profitability, and enhanced information and contact management systems for relationship officers. The group competes with a variety of other financial services companies. Competitors include other major California banks, as well as regional, national and international banks. In addition, we compete with investment banks, commercial finance companies, leasing companies and insurance companies. 79 TRUST & PRIVATE FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP The following table presents the historical results of operations for the Trust & Private Financial Services Group:
TRUST & PRIVATE FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP ---------------------------------------------- YEAR ENDED NINE MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 31, SEPTEMBER 30, ---------------------- ---------------------- 1996 1997 1997 1998 ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- RESULTS OF OPERATIONS: (IN THOUSANDS) Net interest income...................................... $ 11,539 $ 20,995 $ 14,332 $ 16,770 Noninterest income....................................... 110,182 128,100 91,951 106,843 ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- Total.................................................... 121,721 149,095 106,283 123,613 Noninterest expense...................................... 108,495 123,102 89,581 96,897 Credit expense (income).................................. 927 155 102 249 Performance center earnings (losses)..................... (674) (1,472) (929) 105 Income before income taxes............................... 11,625 24,366 15,671 26,572 BALANCE SHEET DATA (PERIOD AVERAGE): (IN MILLIONS) Total loans before performance centers................... $ 62 $ 229 $ 236 $ 245 Total assets............................................. 94 303 322 297 Total deposits before performance centers................ 425 708 625 679 OTHER DATA:................................................ Return on average assets................................. 7.36% 4.74% 3.90% 7.34% Efficiency ratio......................................... 89.13 82.57 84.29 78.39
The Trust & Private Financial Services Group offers investment management and administration services for a broad range of individuals and institutions. The group: - services individual client needs through its trust and private banking, investment management and brokerage products and services, - services institutional client needs through traditional employee benefit and 401(k) programs, global and domestic securities custody programs, securities lending programs and corporate trust products, and - provides investment management services for both individual and institutional clients through HighMark Capital Management, Inc. and its family of proprietary HighMark mutual funds. As of September 30, 1998, the group had over $90 billion in assets under administration. The group is organized into five business divisions: - The Private Bank division focuses primarily on delivering integrated and customized financial services to high net worth individuals with sophisticated financial needs. Specific products and services include trust and estate services, investment account management services, offshore trust services and customized deposit and credit products. The Private Bank's strategy is to expand its business by increasing its geographic market coverage and the breadth of its products and services. To support that strategy, The Private Bank expanded from nine offices to 14 during 1998. In addition, it has shifted sales staff training efforts toward increased cross-selling of all of the bank's available products and services. 80 - HighMark Capital Management, Inc., a registered investment advisor, manages our proprietary HighMark family of mutual funds. It also provides investment management services to institutions, pension plans and individuals, including to clients of other divisions. HighMark Capital Management's strategy is to expand distribution of its mutual funds by targeting its marketing efforts at registered investment advisors and regional broker/dealers. In addition, HighMark is working with The Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi and other third parties to establish mutual funds offshore which HighMark will advise and which will be offered to non-U.S. investors. HighMark also serves as a sub-advisor for funds managed by Tokyo-Mitsubishi Asset Management, Limited in Japan. - The Business Trust division provides businesses, government agencies, unions and non-profit organizations with trustee services, investment management and 401(k) valuation and record keeping services. Business Trust's strategy is to expand its third-party distribution network to include insurance companies, investment managers, brokers and mutual funds. - The Investment Services division consists of UBOC Insurance Services and UBOC Investment Services, Inc., a registered broker/dealer offering a full line of investment products to individuals and institutional clients. The division's primary strategy is to further penetrate UnionBanCal Corporation's existing client base. - The Securities Services division is engaged in domestic and global securities custody, safekeeping, mutual fund accounting, securities lending and corporate trust services. Its client base includes financial institutions, businesses, government agencies, unions, investment managers and non-profit organizations. Securities Services is the only West Coast based provider of a full range of institutional financial services. 81 INTERNATIONAL BANKING GROUP The following table presents the historical results of operations for the International Banking Group:
INTERNATIONAL BANKING GROUP ---------------------------------------------- YEAR ENDED NINE MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 31, SEPTEMBER 30, ---------------------- ---------------------- 1996 1997 1997 1998 ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- RESULTS OF OPERATIONS: (IN THOUSANDS) Net interest income...................................... $ 48,175 $ 49,405 $ 35,990 $ 42,487 Noninterest income....................................... 62,373 62,238 46,887 49,758 ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- Total.................................................... 110,548 111,643 82,877 92,245 Noninterest expense...................................... 72,719 64,874 48,942 48,765 Credit expense (income).................................. (4,361) 234 216 2,915 Performance center earnings (losses)..................... (6,917) (3,759) (3,171) (2,394) Income before income taxes............................... 35,273 42,776 30,548 38,171 BALANCE SHEET DATA (PERIOD AVERAGE): (IN MILLIONS) Total loans before performance centers................... $ 1,443 $ 1,631 $ 1,423 $ 1,385 Total assets............................................. 2,210 2,631 2,563 2,123 Total deposits before performance centers................ 1,080 959 980 864 OTHER DATA:................................................ Return on average assets................................. 0.95% 0.96% 0.96% 1.45% Efficiency ratio......................................... 65.78 58.11 59.05 52.86
The International Banking Group primarily provides correspondent banking and trade finance-related products and services to financial institutions worldwide, including in Brazil, Hong Kong, Japan, Korea and Taiwan. This includes the provision of products and services that facilitate trade finance transactions, including payments, collection and the extension of short-term credit. It also serves selected foreign firms and U.S. corporate clients in selected countries worldwide, particularly in Asia. In the United States, International Banking serves subsidiaries and affiliates of non-Japanese Asian companies and U.S. branches and agencies of foreign banks. It also provides international services to domestic corporate clients along the West Coast. For the nine months ended September 30, 1998, average assets in this group were $2.1 billion and average deposits were $864 million. This group has a long and stable history of providing correspondent and trade-related services to international financial institutions. We believe that we have achieved a leading market position and strong customer loyalty in the Asia/Pacific correspondent banking market because we provide high quality, customized products and services at competitive prices. The group maintains branches in Tokyo, Taipei, Seoul, Manila and Hong Kong, representative offices in other parts of Asia and Latin America, and an international banking subsidiary in New York. One of International Banking's primary services is international trade finance. Trade finance is typically short term, which means it generally has a lower credit risk. Despite this relatively lower credit risk compared to some other forms of commercial credit, we have reduced the amount of credit we have extended to our customers and the average maturity of this portfolio in response to recent instability in global markets. UnionBanCal Corporation has substantially reduced its cross-border outstandings. We reduced outstandings to Japan, Korea, Taiwan, Malaysia, Thailand, Vietnam, Singapore, Indonesia, the Philippines, China and Hong Kong by $1.0 billion to $1.5 billion at September 30, 1998 compared to $2.5 billion at December 31, 1997. A substantial portion of the outstandings are related to the International Banking 82 Group. In addition, our outstandings to Latin America were only $295 million at September 30, 1998, $133 million of which was attributable to Brazil. Management continues to closely monitor the amount of credit we have extended to our customers in international markets. International Banking's strategy is to improve its global operations by reducing costs and improving productivity. It competes with both U.S. and foreign banks. Approximately 25 U.S. banks compete with the group to provide correspondent banking and trade-related services to Asian banks. The group's primary competitors include First Union, Bank of New York, Chase Manhattan, Citibank, Bank of America, and Bank of Hawaii. OTHER BUSINESS ACTIVITIES We also conduct business activities with customers through other organizational units of the bank. The Pacific Rim Corporate Group specializes in providing a range of credit, deposit, and investment management products and services to companies in the United States that are affiliated with companies headquartered outside the United States, mostly in Japan. For the nine months ended September 1998, average assets were $811 million. The Global Markets Group conducts business activities primarily to support the previously described business groups and their customers. This group offers a broad range of risk management products, such as foreign exchange, interest rate swaps, caps and floors. Additionally, it originates debt instruments for bank eligible issuers, places debt securities, as well as the bank's own liabilities, with institutional investors and trades debt instruments in the secondary market. This group also manages our market-related risks as part of its responsibilities for asset/liability management. It is also responsible for maintaining the bank's investment securities portfolio. OPERATING STRATEGY Our operating strategy is to: - CAPITALIZE ON OUR STRONG POSITION IN CORE CALIFORNIA MARKET. We believe that one of our primary strategic strengths is our established position in the attractive California bank market. Based on both total assets and total deposits in California, we are the third largest commercial bank in California, and we are among the oldest banks on the West Coast. We serve approximately one million households and small businesses, with 244 full-service branches in California. - STRENGTHEN OUR CONSUMER BANKING FRANCHISE. We are seeking to increase the number of consumer households we serve, and we are simultaneously broadening the range of financial products and services we provide to existing customers. We are adding to the number of households we serve by offering product and service delivery alternatives, including online banking, video kiosks and telephone-based services. We are also obtaining new customers with the successful use of targeted direct mail promotions. In an effort to offer our customers more loan and deposit products, we have installed a new computer-driven sales system designed to foster cross-selling. The new system has been installed in 40 of our branches, and we anticipate full implementation within 18 months. We also plan to expand the franchise through new branch openings and the possible acquisition of community banks in targeted markets. - FOCUS OUR COMMERCIAL BANKING EFFORTS ON SPECIFIC INDUSTRIES AND COMPANIES. We are targeting our commercial banking activities on those industries and companies that we believe will make us one of their principal banks. Our emphasis is on relationship management and meeting a large part of our targeted customers' credit and depository needs. Our commercial banking activities include industry specialties, such as communications, media and energy. We have been successful in increasing our role as agent and/or underwriter in syndicated loans to these specialized industry customers. We intend to broaden our syndication efforts to include other 83 markets we serve, such as real estate finance and middle-market companies. We also provide depository and cash management services to niche markets, including title and escrow companies, financial institutions, retailers and bankruptcy trustees. - DIVERSIFY OUR REVENUE SOURCES AND EXPAND OUR FEE-BASED BUSINESS. We are seeking to diversify our revenue sources by expanding our fee-based businesses, with a particular emphasis on our trust and asset management businesses. We are working with The Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi and other third parties to offer our proprietary HighMark mutual funds offshore to non-U.S. residents and to serve as a sub-advisor for funds managed by Tokyo-Mitsubishi Asset Management, Limited in Japan. We intend to expand the activities of our brokerage and insurance businesses by further penetrating our existing client base. We expanded our private banking business in 1998 to include 14 offices. We also intend to expand our distribution of 401(k) valuation and record- keeping services to insurance companies, investment managers, brokers and mutual funds. Our noninterest income, net of gain on the sale of our credit card portfolio, has increased from 26% of total revenue in 1995 to 28% of total revenue for the nine-month period ended September 30, 1998. For the nine-month period ended September 30, 1997 to the nine-month period ended September 30, 1998, noninterest income, net of gain on the sale of our credit card portfolio, increased from $342.6 million to $382.9 million. - EMPHASIZE OUR QUALITY CUSTOMER SERVICE. We seek to continue to provide highly responsive customer service to create and maintain long-term relationships with clients who are often underserved by larger banks. We intend to continue to capitalize on the high quality of our customer service, taking advantage of any changes in service levels caused by recent increases in bank merger activity in the California market. - MAINTAIN OUR HIGH LENDING STANDARDS AND OUR STRONG ASSET QUALITY PROFILE. We strive to maintain strong asset quality through our underwriting standards, credit policies and ongoing credit reviews of our existing loan portfolio. These criteria, along with the recent strength of the California economy, have resulted in our current high quality portfolio. At September 30, 1998, our ratio of non-performing assets to total assets was 0.26%, or the seventh lowest of the 30 largest commercial banks in the United States. In addition, as of September 30, 1998, our ratio of reserves to total loans was 2.02%, or the eighth highest of the 30 largest commercial banks in the United States. At September 30, 1998, no industry concentration exceeded 10% of our total commercial, financial and industrial loans. Additionally, at September 30, 1998, we had a limited number of borrowers with larger loans. We had only 10 borrowers with total outstanding balances of over $50 million, and only one borrower with a total outstanding balance of over $75 million. - IDENTIFY STRATEGIC BUSINESSES AND CONSIDER POTENTIAL ACQUISITIONS OR DIVESTITURES. We view selective acquisitions, divestitures, and internal growth as the primary means to increase and enhance our core businesses. We will consider acquisitions of banks and other financial service businesses that will increase our presence in existing markets or allow us to expand into contiguous markets. We will also consider acquisitions in other complementary financial service businesses in which we believe there exists superior growth potential. In addition, we will consider exiting businesses that do not meet our core business criteria. Our strategic business evaluation process focuses on historical financial performance, the competitive environment, future growth potential and regulatory considerations. - IMPROVE OUR OPERATING EFFICIENCY. We plan to improve our operating efficiency by undertaking a comprehensive review of all our lines of business and our product, customer support and administrative departments. To assist us in this effort, we expect to employ a consultant with 84 demonstrated success in realizing long-term efficiency improvements at other major financial institutions. Our aim is to begin an efficiency improvement project during the second quarter of 1999 and to have it fully implemented by late 2000. - ACHIEVE COMPETITIVE FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE TARGETS. In connection with our strategic repositioning, we have developed long-term financial performance goals. These goals will serve as a tool for measuring the long-term success of our operating strategies, based on normal business operations, without including nonrecurring events that may occur from time to time. Our long-term financial performance goals include:
PERFORMANCE RATIO GOAL - - Return on average common equity 15% to 17% - - Earnings per share growth 10% to 12% - - Efficiency ratio 54% to 56% - - Tangible common equity to assets 7.5% to 8.5%
Although we believe these goals are realizable given our proposed operating strategies and our current asset quality, we cannot assure you that we will attain these long-term financial performance goals at any particular time. See "Risk Factors--Adverse Factors Could Impact Our Ability to Attain Our Long-Term Financial Performance Goals" on page 10. - ALIGN OUR SENIOR MANAGEMENT COMPENSATION WITH SHAREHOLDERS' INTERESTS. Our senior management compensation philosophy is to pay competitively and to pay for performance. In connection with our strategic repositioning, we have taken steps to align senior management compensation more directly with shareholders' interests. To this end, we have made several changes to our senior management compensation programs. We have linked our Senior Management Bonus Plan to our return on average common equity performance target and net income. In addition, we have increased the percentage of stock-based compensation, including options, restricted stock, and performance shares, that makes up our senior management's total compensation, with increased emphasis on stock options. We believe that the level of compensation, as well as the percentage of stock to total compensation paid to senior management, are competitive with our peers in the banking industry. We intend to institute stock ownership guidelines for our U.S. senior managers and Board members by the end of this year. 85 MANAGEMENT DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS The following table presents pertinent information concerning our directors and executive officers as of the date of this prospectus.
NAME AGE POSITION - ------------------------------------ --------- ---------------------------------------------------------- Kaoru Hayama........................ 64 Chairman of the Board Takahiro Moriguchi.................. 54 President and Chief Executive Officer Yoshihiko Someya.................... 51 Deputy Chairman of the Board Richard C. Hartnack................. 53 Vice Chairman of the Board Robert M. Walker.................... 57 Vice Chairman of the Board Peter R. Butcher.................... 59 Executive Vice President and Chief Credit Officer Katsuyoshi Hamahashi................ 50 Executive Vice President and Treasurer David I. Matson..................... 54 Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer Magan C. Patel...................... 61 Executive Vice President Charles L. Pedersen................. 55 Executive Vice President Michael A.C. Spilsbury.............. 49 Executive Vice President Ikuzo Sugiyama...................... 49 Executive Vice President Philip M. Wexler.................... 60 Executive Vice President Richard D. Farman................... 63 Director Stanley F. Farrar................... 55 Director Herman E. Gallegos.................. 68 Director Jack L. Hancock..................... 68 Director Harry W. Low........................ 67 Director Mary S. Metz........................ 61 Director Raymond E. Miles.................... 66 Director J. Fernando Niebla.................. 59 Director Sidney R. Petersen.................. 68 Director Carl W. Robertson................... 62 Director Henry T. Swigert.................... 68 Director Tsuneo Wakai........................ 72 Director Hiroshi Watanabe.................... 58 Director Blenda J. Wilson.................... 58 Director Kenji Yoshizawa..................... 66 Director
KAORU HAYAMA. Mr. Hayama has served as Chairman of UnionBanCal Corporation and the bank since September 1998. Prior to that he served as Deputy President and Senior Managing Director of The Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi from April 1996 until June 1998. From June 1994 to April 1996, Mr. Hayama served as Deputy President of the former The Bank of Tokyo, Ltd., and from June 1992 to June 1994, he served as Senior Managing Director of the Americas for the former The Bank of Tokyo, Ltd. and as Chairman and CEO of the Bank of Tokyo Trust Company. From June 1986 to June 1992, he served as General Manager of the former The Bank of Tokyo Ltd.'s Planning Division. Mr. Hayama was elected to the former The Bank of Tokyo, Ltd.'s Board of Directors in June 1986, and he was elected Managing Director in June 1988 and Senior Managing Director in June 1992. TAKAHIRO MORIGUCHI. Mr. Moriguchi has served as President and Chief Executive Officer of UnionBanCal Corporation and the bank since May 1997. Prior to that he served as Vice Chairman and Chief Financial Officer of UnionBanCal Corporation and the bank from April 1996 to May 1997 and as Vice Chairman and Chief Financial Officer of the former Union Bank from June 1993 until March 1996. From May 1992 to May 1993, Mr. Moriguchi served as General Manager of the former The Bank of Tokyo, Ltd.'s 86 Capital Markets Division No. 2, and from July 1988 to April 1992, as President and Managing Director of the former Bank of Tokyo Capital Markets, Ltd., London. He has served as a director of The Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi since April 1996 and he served as a director of the former The Bank of Tokyo, Ltd. from June 1995 to April 1996. Mr. Moriguchi has served as a director of UnionBanCal Corporation since June 1993. YOSHIHIKO SOMEYA. Mr. Someya has served as Deputy Chairman and head of Credit and Administration and Trust and Private Financial Services Group since July 1998. He served as Executive Vice President, Credit Management and Support Liaison from March 1998 to July 1998. Prior to that he served as Deputy General Manager, The Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi Osaka Branch from May 1996 to March 1998. From May 1995 to May 1996, Mr. Someya served as the General Manager of The Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi's Financial Institutions Division, and from May 1993 to May 1995, he served as Director and General Manager, Management Planning Division of DC Card Co., Ltd., a subsidiary of The Mitsubishi Bank, Limited. In addition, Mr. Someya served as General Manager of The Mitsubishi Bank's Tameike Branch from May 1991 to May 1993, and from May 1987 to January 1991, he served as Vice President, Corporate Management, of the former Bank of California, N.A. RICHARD C. HARTNACK. Mr. Hartnack has served as Vice Chairman and head of the Community Banking Group of UnionBanCal Corporation and the bank since April 1996. Prior to that he served as Vice Chairman of the former Union Bank from June 1991 until March 1996, and from mid-1987 to June 1991, he served as Executive Vice President and head of the Community Bank Group, The First National Bank of Chicago. Mr. Hartnack has served as a director of UnionBanCal Corporation since June 1991. ROBERT M. WALKER. Mr. Walker has served as Vice Chairman and head of the Commercial Financial Services Group for UnionBanCal Corporation and the bank since April 1996 and as head of the Corporate and Real Estate Banking Group for UnionBanCal Corporation and the bank since July 1996. Prior to that Mr. Walker served as Vice Chairman and head of the Commercial Financial Services Group of the former Union Bank from July 1992 until March 1996. From February 1992 to July 1992, he served as Vice Chairman and Chief Credit Officer of Valley National Bank, and from August 1988 to February 1992, he served as Senior Executive Vice President and Chief Credit Officer, Valley National Bank. Mr. Walker has served as a director of UnionBanCal Corporation since July 1992. PETER R. BUTCHER. Mr. Butcher has served as Executive Vice President, Credit Management Group, of UnionBanCal Corporation and the bank since April 1996 and as Chief Credit Officer since July 1998. Prior to that he served as Executive Vice President and Chief Credit Officer of the former BanCal Tri-State Corporation and former Bank of California, N.A. from July 1993 until March 1996, and from March 1992 to July 1993, Mr. Butcher served as Executive Vice President of Society National Bank. From 1990 to 1992, he served as Executive Vice President and Chief Credit Policy Officer, Ameritrust Corporation. He also served as Principal of ICON Associates from 1989 to 1990, and he served in various positions with Midland Bank PLC, London, England, from 1956 to 1988. KATSUYOSHI HAMAHASHI. Mr. Hamahashi has served as head of the Global Markets Group of UnionBanCal Corporation and the bank since October 1998. He also has served as Executive Vice President and Treasurer of UnionBanCal Corporation and the bank since April 1996. Prior to that he served as Executive Vice President and Treasurer of the former Union Bank from February 1996 to March 1996 and as Senior Vice President and Treasurer of the former Union Bank from February 1993 to February 1996. From October 1989 to January 1993, Mr. Hamahashi served as Deputy General Manager, Money Market Planning Division of the former The Bank of Tokyo, Ltd. DAVID I. MATSON. Mr. Matson has served as Executive Vice President of UnionBanCal Corporation and the bank since August 1997 and as Chief Financial Officer since July 1998. Prior to that he served as Director of Finance of UnionBanCal Corporation and the bank from August 1997 until July 1998 and as Executive Vice President and head of the Institutional and Deposit Markets Division from April 1996 until July 1997. From January 1994 to March 1996, Mr. Matson served in the same capacity at the former Union 87 Bank. Mr. Matson held various positions at the former Union Bank, including in the middle market, corporate, leasing, merchant banking and cash management divisions, beginning in 1976. He also served as Controller of the former Union Bank for seven years during that time. MAGAN C. PATEL. Mr. Patel has served as Executive Vice President and head of the International Banking Group of UnionBanCal Corporation and the bank since April 1996. Prior to that he served as Executive Vice President, International Banking Group, of the former Bank of California, N.A. from 1985 to 1996. CHARLES L. PEDERSEN. Mr. Pedersen has served as Executive Vice President and head of the Systems, Technology and Item Processing Group of UnionBanCal Corporation and the bank since April 1996. Prior to that he served as Senior Vice President and head of the Bank Operations and Automation Group of the former Union Bank from February 1991 to March 1996, becoming Executive Vice President in September 1992. He served as a division head for the former Union Bank's Systems and Item Processing in the Bank Operations and Automation Group from November 1988 to February 1991. MICHAEL A. C. SPILSBURY. Mr. Spilsbury has served as Executive Vice President and head of the Operations and Services Group of UnionBanCal Corporation and the bank since April 1996. Prior to that he served as Executive Vice President, Resources and Services, with the former Bank of California, N.A. from January 1992 through March 1996. Mr. Spilsbury served as Senior Vice President in the Banking Group of the former Bank of California, N.A. from January 1989 to January 1992. IKUZO SUGIYAMA. Mr. Sugiyama has served as Executive Vice President and head of the Pacific Rim Corporate Group of UnionBanCal Corporation and the bank and as General Manager of the Los Angeles Branch of The Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi since July 1997. Prior to that he served as Chief Manager, Corporate Banking Division No. 3 under Corporate Banking Group No. 1 of The Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi from April 1996 to July 1997. From April 1994 to March 1996, Mr. Sugiyama served as Deputy General Manager of the Marunouchi Office of the former The Bank of Tokyo, Ltd., and from May 1991 to March 1994, he served as Deputy General Manager of the Los Angeles Agency of the former The Bank of Tokyo, Ltd. and as Senior Vice President of the Japanese Corporate Department-LA of the former Union Bank. From August 1989 to May 1991, he served as Manager, Loan Department, of the former The Bank of Tokyo, Ltd.'s Los Angeles Office, and from September 1988 to August 1989, he served as Vice President, Japanese Corporate Department of California First Bank in Los Angeles. PHILIP M. WEXLER. Mr. Wexler has served as Executive Vice President and head of the Specialized Lending Group of UnionBanCal Corporation and the bank since April 1996. Prior to that he served as Executive Vice President and General Manager of the Specialized Lending Group of the former Union Bank from October 1987 through March 1996. RICHARD D. FARMAN. Mr. Farman has served as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Sempra Energy since July 1998 and as President and Chief Operating Officer of Pacific Enterprises since September 1993. Prior to that Mr. Farman served as Chief Executive Officer of Southern California Gas Company, a subsidiary of Pacific Enterprises, from January 1989 through December 1994. Mr. Farman has been a director of UnionBanCal Corporation since November 1988, and has served as a director of Catellus Development Corporation since May 1997. STANLEY F. FARRAR. Mr. Farrar has been a partner of Sullivan & Cromwell since October 1984. He served as a director of the former BanCal Tri-State Corporation and the former Bank of California, N.A. from June 1984 until March 1996. Mr. Farrar has been a director of UnionBanCal Corporation since April 1996. HERMAN E. GALLEGOS. Mr. Gallegos has been an independent management consultant since January 1982. He has served as a director of SBC Communications Inc. and its predecessors since 1974 and The California Endowment since May 1996. Mr. Gallegos has been a director of UnionBanCal Corporation since November 1988. 88 JACK L. HANCOCK. Mr. Hancock was Executive Vice President of Pacific Bell from February 1988 until December 1993. He has been a director of Interline Technology since December 1987, Persistence Software since September 1993, Whittaker Corporation since February 1994 and of MGC Communications and Bankers, LLP, since July 1996. Mr. Hancock has been a director of UnionBanCal Corporation since July 1994. HARRY W. LOW. Justice Low has been a mediator and arbitrator with Judicial Arbitration & Mediation Services/Endispute, Inc. (JAMS/Endispute) since March 1992. He was the Presiding Justice for the State of California Court of Appeal, 1st District, Division 5, from 1982 until his retirement in January 1992. Justice Low has been a director of UnionBanCal Corporation since January 1993. MARY S. METZ. Dr. Metz has served as President and Chief Executive Officer of the S.H. Cowell Foundation since January 5, 1999. Prior to that she served as the Dean of University Extension, University of California, Berkeley, from July 1991 to September 1998 and as President of Mills College from 1981 to June 1990. Dr. Metz has served as a director of SBC Communications, Inc. and its predecessors since July 1986, Pacific Gas & Electric Co. since March 1986, and Longs Drugs Stores since February 1991. Dr. Metz has been director of UnionBanCal Corporation since November 1988. RAYMOND E. MILES. Professor Miles has been a Professor at the Haas School of Business at the University of California, Berkeley, since July 1963. He served as a director of the former BanCal Tri-State Corporation and the former Bank of California, N.A. from January 1987 to March 1996. He has served as a director of Granite Construction Co., Inc. since May 1988. Professor Miles has been a director of UnionBanCal Corporation since April 1996. J. FERNANDO NIEBLA. Mr. Niebla has served as Chairman of Infotec Commercial Systems since December 1995 and also served as Chief Executive Officer until June 1998. From September 1979 to June 1996, he served as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Infotec Development, Inc. He also served as a director of the former BanCal Tri-State Corporation and the former Bank of California, N.A. from July 1994 through March 1996. Mr. Niebla has been a director of UnionBanCal Corporation since April 1996. SIDNEY R. PETERSEN. Mr. Petersen has been a consultant and private investor since August 1984. He served as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Getty Oil Company until his retirement in July 1984. He has been a director of Avery Dennison Corporation since December 1981, NICOR, Inc. since May 1987, Seagull Energy Corporation since October 1996 and Sypris Solutions, Inc. since March 1998. Mr. Petersen has been a director of UnionBanCal Corporation since November 1988. CARL W. ROBERTSON. Mr. Robertson has been the Managing Director of Warland Investments Company since January 1985. He served as a director of the former BanCal Tri-State Corporation and the former Bank of California, N.A. from April 1975 to March 1996. Mr. Robertson has been a director of UnionBanCal Corporation since April 1996. HENRY T. SWIGERT. Mr. Swigert has served as Chairman of ESCO Corporation since January 1979. From April 1989 until April 1996, he served as a director of the former BanCal Tri-State Corporation and the former Bank of California, N.A. Mr. Swigert has been a director of UnionBanCal Corporation since April 1996. TSUNEO WAKAI. Mr. Wakai has been the Senior Advisor of The Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi since January 1998. Prior to that he was Chairman of the Board of The Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi from April 1996 through December 1997, and the President of the former The Mitsubishi Bank, Ltd. from June 1990 through March 1996. Mr. Wakai has been a director of UnionBanCal Corporation since April 1996. HIROSHI WATANABE. Mr. Watanabe has served as Managing Director and Chief Executive Officer of The Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi, Ltd., Headquarters for the Americas, since July 1998. Prior to that he served as Managing Director and General Manager, Corporate Planning Division, of The Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi 89 from April 1996 to July 1998, and he served in the same capacity in the Planning Division of the former The Bank of Tokyo, Ltd. from June 1995 to April 1996. Mr. Watanabe served as a director and General Manager of the former The Bank of Tokyo, Ltd. from June 1992 to June 1995, as General Manager, Planning Division of the former The Bank of Tokyo, Ltd. from June 1991 to June 1992, and as General Manager, Shinjuku Office, from February 1990 to June 1991. Mr. Watanabe served as Managing Director, Bank of Tokyo International Limited and as Senior Counselor for the Resident Senior Managing Director for Europe from April 1988 to February 1990. BLENDA J. WILSON. Dr. Wilson has served as the President of California State University, Northridge, since September 1992. She served as Chancellor of the University of Michigan-Dearborn from 1988 to 1992. Dr. Wilson has been a director of UnionBanCal Corporation since July 1993. KENJI YOSHIZAWA. Mr. Yoshizawa has served as the Deputy President and director of The Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi, Ltd. since April 1996. Prior to that he served as Deputy President and director of the former The Bank of Tokyo, Ltd. from June 1990 through March 1996 and as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the former Bank of Tokyo Trust Company from September 1989 to September 1990. Mr. Yoshizawa served as a Senior Managing Director of the former The Bank of Tokyo, Ltd. from June 1988 to June 1990, and as Managing Director thereof from April 1986 to June 1988. Mr. Yoshizawa has been a director of UnionBanCal Corporation since September 1989. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION SPECIFIED OFFICERS The following summarizes the compensation that we paid to our President and Chief Executive Officer, the Deputy Chairman and two Vice Chairmen of the Board (collectively, the "Specified Officers") in 1998 and 1997. The Executive Compensation and Benefits Committee of the Board approves all elements of the compensation and benefits for these individuals, as well as other of our executive officers. Messrs. Moriguchi and Someya are serving as executive officers on a rotational assignment from The Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi. The Committee therefore takes into account the applicable compensation policies of The Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi when determining their compensation during their tenure with us. As expatriate officers, they are not eligible to receive annual bonuses, restricted stock awards, stock option grants, or performance share awards. Mr. Moriguchi was elected President and Chief Executive Officer in May 1997, replacing Mr. Kanetaka Yoshida. Mr. Moriguchi's salary totaled $329,735 in 1998, and $378,785 in 1997. Mr. Someya was elected Deputy Chairman of the Board in July 1998, replacing Mr. Minoru Noda. Mr. Someya's salary for the period March 1998 through December 1998 totaled $269,497. Mr. Someya was employed by The Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi prior to that time. Messrs. Hartnack and Walker have been serving as Vice Chairmen since April 1996. Mr. Hartnack's salary totaled $415,000 for 1998 and Mr. Walker's was $415,000 for 1998. Neither of these amounts include bonuses, as we will not determine such compensation until first quarter of 1999. In 1998, Messrs. Hartnack and Walker each received a grant of 19,500 stock options and a target award of 6,600 performance shares, each on a post-split basis. Mr. Walker also was awarded 18,000 shares, on a post-split basis, of restricted stock. In 1997, we paid each of Messrs. Hartnack and Walker $353,842 in salary, $240,000 in bonuses and $53,100 in restricted stock awards. COMPENSATION COMPONENTS The following summarizes the main components of our compensation package offered to our executive officers, including the Specified Officers and a number of our Executive and Senior Vice Presidents. 90 BASE SALARY. The Executive Compensation and Benefits Committee establishes base salaries for the Specified Officers as well as for other of our executives. The Committee considers comparable positions at other banks, taking into account the relative responsibilities of the executives involved. In general, we target base salaries at the median competitive levels to attract and retain highly experienced and qualified executives. Where the responsibilities of executive positions at UnionBanCal Corporation exceed those typically found among other banks, or if the executive plays a particularly critical role at UnionBanCal Corporation, we may target base salaries above median competitive levels. In determining salaries, the Executive Compensation and Benefits Committee also takes into account individual leadership and vision, experience and performance, as well as internal equity relative to other positions within UnionBanCal Corporation, and specific issues particular to UnionBanCal Corporation and the position involved. ANNUAL BONUSES. The purpose of the annual bonus plan is to provide a median competitive annual incentive opportunity at target performance levels. Target awards under the plan represent the median of the competitive market for comparable executive positions at banks of similar size and focus. Actual awards are determined based on our performance and the individual participant. Participants under the Senior Management Bonus Plan include all executives at the Senior Vice President level and above, other than expatriate officers, with responsibility for matters that impact our overall performance. We assign participants target bonuses comparable to median competitive levels. The size of the bonus fund is based on our performance on two measures relative to our annual financial plan. In 1998, those two measures were return on average assets and net income. For 1999, we have changed our Senior Management Bonus Plan, substituting return on average common equity in place of return on average assets. We believe changing the Senior Management Bonus Plan to include return on average common equity provides a stronger link between compensation and shareholder value creation. The bonus fund size may vary up to two times the aggregate for target bonuses, based on our performance on the two measures. In addition, the Executive Compensation and Benefits Committee may increase or decrease the bonus fund within limits, based on our performance in other areas, including strategic and organizational achievements, other financial measures, and relative performance against our peers. We base individual bonus awards on individual performance and contributions. LONG TERM INCENTIVE PROGRAM. We provide long-term incentive awards to individuals who can directly impact our long-term performance and value. Target awards are comparable to median competitive levels. Eligible participants may receive grants consisting of one or more types of long-term incentives, including stock options, restricted stock, and performance shares. We base grants on an individual's scope and level of responsibilities. The grants reflect competitive practices for similar positions in peer companies. We determine performance share awards based on our performance compared to the performance of our peers. STOCK OPTIONS AND RESTRICTED STOCK. We believe in tying rewards for eligible executives directly to our long-term success and increases in shareholder value through stock option grants and restricted stock awards. These rewards also enable executives to develop and maintain a stock ownership position in our common stock. We target the amounts of long-term incentives at median competitive levels, taking into account the responsibilities of the officers involved. It is our intention to place greater emphasis on the use of stock options rather than restricted stock in future incentive awards. The UnionBanCal Corporation Management Stock Plan authorizes us to issue up to 6,600,000 shares of our common stock to specified employees as grants of stock options and awards of restricted stock. The 6,600,000 share maximum represented approximately 3.8 percent of our common stock outstanding as of December 31, 1998. Canceled or forfeited options and restricted stock become available for future grants. Expatriate officers are not eligible to participate in the UnionBanCal Corporation Management Stock Plan. The Executive Compensation and Benefits Committee determines the term of each stock option grant, up to a maximum of ten years from the date of grant. The exercise price must not be less than the fair market 91 value on the grant date. Options vest in thirds over three years, provided that the employee has completed the specified continuous service requirement, or earlier if the employee dies or is permanently and totally disabled or retires under specified grant, age and service conditions. In general, awards of restricted stock vest in fourths over four years from the grant date, provided that the employee has completed the specified continuous service requirement, or earlier if the employee dies or is permanently and totally disabled or retires under specified grant, age and service conditions. Restricted stockholders have the right to vote their restricted shares and to receive dividends. 1997 UNIONBANCAL CORPORATION PERFORMANCE SHARE PLAN. In 1997, we adopted the 1997 UnionBanCal Corporation Performance Share Plan. Eligible participants may earn performance share awards to be redeemed in cash three years after the date of grant. Performance shares are linked to shareholder value in two ways: (1) the market price of our common stock, and (2) performance as measured on return on assets, a performance measure closely linked to value creation. Expatriate officers are not eligible to participate in the UnionBanCal Corporation Performance Share Plan. EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENTS Mr. Hartnack entered into a new Employment Agreement with the bank in January 1998, which replaced the agreement he entered into when he began employment with us in 1991. In addition to other benefits, Mr. Hartnack is entitled to severance benefits including separation pay and benefits for a minimum of two years treatment as though he were eligible for early retirement benefits, if not yet eligible, and vesting in full of the target award amount under his outstanding grants of performance shares under the UnionBanCal Corporation Performance Share Plan. Additionally, Mr. Hartnack will receive a pension supplement which will provide the actuarial equivalent of the extra amount Mr. Hartnack would receive under the Union Bank of California Retirement Plan if the limitations on benefits set forth in Sections 415 and 401(a)(17) of the Internal Revenue Code did not otherwise apply. In addition, the supplement will provide the actuarial equivalent of the extra amount Mr. Hartnack would receive if the Union Bank of California Retirement Plan had taken into account Mr. Hartnack's nine previous years of service with The First National Bank of Chicago. The supplement will be reduced by the actuarial equivalent of the lump sum distributions Mr. Hartnack has received from the qualified and non-qualified plans of The First National Bank of Chicago. Mr. Walker entered into a new Employment Agreement with the bank in January 1998, which replaced the agreement he entered into when he began employment with us in 1992. In addition to other benefits, Mr. Walker is entitled to severance benefits consisting of separation pay benefits for a minimum of two years and vesting in full of the target award amount under his outstanding grants of performance shares under the UnionBanCal Corporation Performance Shares Plan. Additionally, Mr. Walker will receive a supplemental pension which will provide the actuarial equivalent of the extra amount Mr. Walker would receive under the Union Bank of California Retirement Plan if the limitations on benefits set forth in Sections 415 and 401(a)(17) of the Internal Revenue Code did not otherwise apply. This supplement also credits Mr. Walker with an additional five years of credited service. 92 SELLING SHAREHOLDER The selling shareholder is The Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi, Ltd. We are The Bank of Toyko-Mitsubishi's largest overseas subsidiary. The Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi was created through the merger, on April 1, 1996, of The Bank of Tokyo, Ltd. and The Mitsubishi Bank, Limited. In connection with that merger, on April 1, 1996, Union Bank, formerly majority owned by The Bank of Tokyo, combined with BanCal Tri-State Corporation, formerly wholly owned by The Mitsubishi Bank. As a result, The Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi came to own over 80% of UnionBanCal Corporation. The Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi has stated that it intends to maintain its majority stake in UnionBanCal Corporation after the closing of this offering and the related transactions. Since 1996, a number of officers of The Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi have served in management positions with us and/or served on our Board of Directors. The following table presents pertinent information about the shares of our common stock that are owned by The Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi as of the date of this prospectus. We are presenting the information in the table as if the underwriters did not exercise the over-allotment option and as if the repurchase of 7,445,462 shares of common stock from The Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi and 2,100,000 shares of common stock from Meiji Life Insurance Company had occurred.
SHARES OWNED SHARES OWNED PRIOR TO THE OFFERING AFTER THE OFFERING -------------------------- SHARES BEING -------------------------- NAME OF SELLING SHAREHOLDER NUMBER PERCENT OFFERED NUMBER PERCENT - -------------------------------------------------- ------------- ----------- ------------ ------------- ----------- The Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi, Ltd................. 142,925,616 81.5% 22,000,000 113,143,768 68.3% 7-1, Marunouchi 2-chome, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo, 100, Japan
93 DESCRIPTION OF CAPITAL STOCK The following descriptions of our capital stock are not complete. You should also read our Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation, our Bylaws and the California General Corporation Law ("CGCL"). We have filed copies of our Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws with the SEC. These documents are incorporated by reference into the registration statement of which this prospectus is a part. We have 305,000,000 shares of capital stock authorized, of which 300,000,000 shares are common stock and 5,000,000 shares are preferred stock. As of January 29, 1999, we had 175,272,236 shares of common stock issued and outstanding, and no shares of preferred stock issued or outstanding. COMMON STOCK Each holder of shares of our common stock is entitled to one vote for each share held on all matters to be voted upon by our shareholders. The holders of outstanding shares of our common stock are entitled to receive ratably such dividends out of assets legally available therefor as our Board of Directors may determine. Upon our liquidation or dissolution, the holders of our common stock will be entitled to share ratably in our assets that are legally available for distribution to shareholders after payment of liabilities. If we have any preferred stock outstanding, holders of the preferred stock may be entitled to dividend and/or liquidation preferences. In either such case, we must pay the applicable distribution to the holders of our preferred stock before we may pay them to the holders of our common stock. Holders of our common stock have no conversion, sinking fund, redemption, preemptive or subscription rights. In addition, holders of our common stock do not have cumulative voting rights. We cannot further call or assess shares of our common stock. PREFERRED STOCK We are authorized to issue 5,000,000 shares of preferred stock, none of which currently is issued or outstanding. Our Board of Directors has the authority to determine and alter the rights, preferences, privileges and restrictions granted to or imposed upon any unissued series of our preferred stock and to fix the number of shares, dividend rights, conversion or exchange rights, voting rights, redemption rights, liquidation preferences, and sinking funds of any series of our preferred stock. The authorized shares of our preferred stock will be available for issuance without further action by our shareholders, unless shareholder action is required by applicable law or by the rules of a stock exchange on which any series of our stock may be listed. The holders of our preferred stock will have the right to vote separately as a class on any proposal involving fundamental changes in the rights of those holders as provided by the CGCL. This authority of our Board of Directors gives it the power to approve the issuance of a series of preferred stock that could, depending on its terms, either impede or facilitate the completion of a merger, tender offer or other takeover attempt. For example, the issuance of new shares might impede a business combination if the terms of those shares include voting rights that would enable a holder to block business combinations. Conversely, the issuance of new shares might facilitate a business combination if those shares have general voting rights sufficient to satisfy an applicable percentage vote requirement. If applicable, the terms on which our preferred stock may be convertible into or exchangeable for our common stock or our other securities will be described in the applicable Certificate of Determination. The terms will include provisions as to whether conversion or exchange is mandatory, at the option of the holder, or at our option, and may include provisions that adjust the number of shares of our common stock or other securities of ours that the holders of our preferred stock may receive. 94 WRITTEN CONSENTS Our Bylaws provide that any shareholder action can be taken by written consent of the shareholders. As a result, The Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi, which owns a majority of shares of our common stock, can take action by written consent. DIRECTORS' LIABILITY Our Articles of Incorporation provide for indemnification of directors to the fullest extent authorized by California law. Section 317 of the CGCL contains provisions permitting, and in some situations requiring, California corporations to provide indemnification to their directors and officers for losses and litigation expenses incurred in connection with their service to the corporation in those capacities. TRANSFER AGENT AND REGISTRAR Harris Trust Company of California acts as transfer agent and registrar for our common stock. 95 UNITED STATES FEDERAL TAX CONSEQUENCES TO NON-UNITED STATES HOLDERS This is a general discussion of United States federal tax consequences of the acquisition, ownership, and disposition of our common stock by a holder that, for United States federal income tax purposes, is not a "United States person" as we define that term below (a "Non-United States Holder"). We have based this summary upon the United States federal tax law in effect as of the date of this prospectus. These laws may change, possibly retroactively. We do not discuss all aspects of United States federal taxation that may be important to you in light of your individual investment circumstances, such as if special tax rules apply to you, for example, if you are a financial institution, insurance company, broker-dealer, or tax-exempt organization. We urge you to consult your tax advisor about the United States federal tax consequences of acquiring, holding, and disposing of our common stock, as well as any tax consequences that may arise under the laws of any foreign, state, local, or other taxing jurisdiction. For purposes of this discussion, a "United States person" means: - a citizen or resident of the United States, - a corporation, partnership, or other entity created or organized in the United States or under the laws of the United States or of any political subdivision of the United States, - an estate, the income of which is includible in gross income for United States federal income tax purposes regardless of its source, or - a trust, the administration of which is subject to the primary supervision of a United States court and that has one or more United States persons who have the authority to control all substantial decisions of the trust. DIVIDENDS Dividends paid to a Non-United States Holder will generally be subject to withholding of United States federal income tax at the rate of 30%. If, however, the dividend is effectively connected with the conduct of a trade or business in the United States by the Non-United States Holder, the dividend will be subject to the United States federal income tax imposed on net income on the same basis that applies to United States persons generally, and, for corporate holders and under certain circumstances, the branch profits tax. Non-United States Holders should consult any applicable income tax treaties that may provide for a reduction of, or exemption from, withholding taxes. For purposes of determining whether tax is to be withheld at a reduced rate as specified by a treaty, we generally will presume that dividends we pay on or before December 31, 1999, to an address in a foreign country are paid to a resident of that country. Under recently finalized Treasury regulations, which in general apply to dividends that we pay after December 31, 1999, to obtain a reduced rate of withholding under a treaty, a Non-United States Holder generally will be required to provide an Internal Revenue Service Form W-8 certifying as to that Non-United States Holder's entitlement to treaty benefits. These regulations also provide special rules to determine whether, for treaty applicability purposes, dividends that we pay to a Non-United States Holder that is an entity should be treated as paid to holders of interests in such entity. GAIN ON DISPOSITION A Non-United States Holder will generally not be subject to United States federal income tax, including by way of withholding, on gain recognized on a sale or other disposition of our common stock unless: - the gain is effectively connected with the conduct of a trade or business in the United States by the Non-United States Holder or 96 - in the case of a Non-United States Holder who is a nonresident alien individual and who holds our common stock as a capital asset, that holder is present in the United States for 183 or more days in the taxable year of the disposition and certain other requirements are met. Gain that is effectively connected with the conduct of a trade or business in the United States by the Non-United States Holder will be subject to the United States federal income tax imposed on net income on the same basis that applies to United States persons generally, and, for corporate holders and under certain circumstances, the branch profits tax, but will not be subject to withholding. Non-United States Holders should consult any applicable income tax treaties that may provide for different rules. UNITED STATES FEDERAL ESTATE TAXES Our common stock that is owned or treated as owned by an individual who is not a citizen or resident, as specially defined for United States federal estate tax purposes, of the United States on the date of that person's death will be included in his or her estate for United States federal estate tax purposes, unless an applicable estate tax treaty provides otherwise. INFORMATION REPORTING AND BACKUP WITHHOLDING Generally, we must report annually to the United States Internal Revenue Service and to each Non-United States Holder the amount of dividends that we paid to a holder, and the amount of tax that we withheld on such dividends. This information may also be made available to the tax authorities of a country in which the Non-United States Holder resides. Under current United States Treasury regulations, United States information reporting requirements and backup withholding tax will generally not apply to dividends that we pay on our common stock to a Non-United States Holder at an address outside the United States. Payments by a United States office of a broker of the proceeds of a sale of our common stock are subject to both backup withholding at a rate of 31% and information reporting, unless the holder certifies as to its Non-United States Holder status under penalties of perjury or otherwise establishes an exemption. Information reporting requirements, but not backup withholding, will also apply to payments of the proceeds from sales of our common stock by foreign offices of United States brokers, or foreign brokers with certain types of relationships to the United States, unless the broker has documentary evidence in its records that the holder is a Non-United States Holder and certain other conditions are met, or the holder otherwise establishes an exemption. Backup withholding is not an additional tax. Any amounts that we withhold under the backup withholding rules will be refunded or credited against the Non-United States Holder's United States federal income tax liability, if certain required information is furnished to the United States Internal Revenue Service. The United States Treasury Department has promulgated final regulations regarding the withholding and information reporting rules discussed above. In general, those regulations do not significantly alter the substantive withholding and information reporting requirements but unify current certification procedures and forms and clarify reliance standards. The final regulations are generally effective for payments made after December 31, 1999, subject to transition rules. 97 UNDERWRITERS Under the terms and conditions of the Underwriting Agreement dated the date of this prospectus, the U.S. underwriters named below, for whom Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated, Lehman Brothers Inc., J.P. Morgan Securities Inc. and Salomon Smith Barney Inc. are acting as U.S. representatives, and the international underwriters named below for whom Morgan Stanley & Co. International Limited, Lehman Brothers International (Europe), J.P. Morgan Securities Ltd., Salomon Brothers International Limited and Tokyo-Mitsubishi International plc. are acting as international representatives, have severally agreed to purchase, and the selling shareholder has agreed to sell to them, severally, the number of shares indicated below:
NUMBER OF NAME SHARES - ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------ U.S. Underwriters: Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated................................................................. Lehman Brothers Inc............................................................................... J.P. Morgan Securities Inc........................................................................ Salomon Smith Barney Inc.......................................................................... ------------ Subtotal........................................................................................ 17,600,000 ------------ International Underwriters: Morgan Stanley & Co. International Limited........................................................ Lehman Brothers International (Europe)............................................................ J.P. Morgan Securities Ltd........................................................................ Salomon Brothers International Limited............................................................ Tokyo-Mitsubishi International plc................................................................ ------------ Subtotal........................................................................................ 4,400,000 ------------ Total......................................................................................... 22,000,000 ------------ ------------
The underwriters are offering the shares of common stock subject to their acceptance of the shares from the selling shareholder and subject to prior sale. The Underwriting Agreement provides that the obligations of the several underwriters to pay for and accept delivery of the shares are conditioned on the delivery of legal opinions by their counsel. The underwriters are obligated to purchase all of the shares, except those covered by the U.S. underwriters' over-allotment option described below, if any are purchased. In the Agreement between U.S. and International Underwriters, each U.S. underwriter has represented and agreed that (1) it is not purchasing any shares for the account of anyone other than a United States or Canadian person and (2) it has not offered or sold, and will not offer or sell any shares or distribute any prospectus relating to the shares outside the United States or Canada or to anyone other than a United States or Canadian person. Each international underwriter has represented and agreed that (1) it is not purchasing any shares for the account of any United States or Canadian person and (2) it has not offered or sold, and will not offer or sell any shares or distribute any prospectus relating to the shares in the United States or Canada or to any United States or Canadian person. For any underwriter that is both a U.S. underwriter and an international underwriter, these representations and agreements (1) made by it in its capacity as a U.S. underwriter apply only to it in its capacity as a U.S. underwriter and (2) made by it in its capacity as an international underwriter apply only to it in its capacity as an international underwriter. The limitations described above do not apply to, among other things, stabilization transactions or to other transactions specified in the Agreement between U.S. and International Underwriters. As used in this section, "United States or Canadian person" means any national or resident of the United States or Canada, or any corporation, pension, profit-sharing or other trust or other entity organized under the laws of the United States or Canada or of any political subdivision of the United States or Canada, other than a branch 98 located outside the United States and Canada of any United States or Canadian person. "United States or Canadian person" includes any United States or Canadian branch of an entity who is otherwise not a United States or Canadian person. In the Agreement between U.S. and International Underwriters, sales of shares may be made between U.S. underwriters and international underwriters. The price of any shares so sold will be the public offering price set forth on the cover page hereof, in United States dollars, less an amount not greater than $ a share. In the Agreement between U.S. and International Underwriters, each U.S. underwriter has represented that it has not offered or sold, and has agreed not to offer or sell, any shares in any province or territory of Canada or to, or for the benefit of, any resident of any province or territory of Canada in contravention of the securities laws of Canada. Each U.S. underwriter has represented that any offer or sale of shares in Canada will be made only pursuant to an exemption from the requirement to file a prospectus in the province or territory of Canada in which the offer or sale is made. Each U.S. underwriter has further agreed to send to any dealer who purchases from it any of the shares a notice stating that, by purchasing the shares, the dealer agrees that any offer or sale of shares in Canada will be made only pursuant to an exemption from the requirement to file a prospectus in the province or territory of Canada in which the offer or sale is made. Each dealer will deliver to any other dealer to whom it sells any shares a notice containing substantially the same Canadian selling restrictions. In the Agreement between U.S. and International Underwriters, each international underwriter has represented and agreed that: - it has not offered or sold and, prior to the date six months after the closing date for the sale of the shares to the international underwriters, will not offer or sell, any shares to persons in the United Kingdom, except to persons whose ordinary activities involve them in acquiring, holding, managing or disposing of investments for the purposes of their businesses or otherwise in circumstances which have not resulted and will not result in an offer to the public in the United Kingdom within the meaning of the Public Offers of Securities Regulations 1995; - it has complied and will comply with all applicable provisions of the Financial Services Act 1986; and - it has and will distribute any document relating to the shares in the United Kingdom only to a person who is of a kind described in Article 11(3) of the Financial Services Act 1986 (Investment Advertisements) (Exemptions) Order 1996 (as amended) or is a person to whom such document may otherwise lawfully be distributed. In the Agreement between U.S. and International Underwriters, each international underwriter has further represented that it has not offered or sold, and has agreed not to offer or sell in Japan or to or for the account of any resident of Japan any of the shares. This limitation does not apply to offers or sales to Japanese international underwriters or dealers and offers and sales pursuant to any exemption from the registration requirements of the Securities and Exchange Law and otherwise in compliance with applicable provisions of Japanese law. Each international underwriter has further agreed to send to any dealer who purchases from it any of the shares a notice stating that, by purchasing the shares, the dealer agrees that any offer or sale of the shares in Japan will be made only to Japanese international underwriters or dealers or under an exemption from the registration requirements of the Securities and Exchange Law and otherwise in compliance with applicable provisions of Japanese law. Each dealer will send to any other dealer to whom it sells any shares a notice containing substantially the same Japanese selling restrictions. The underwriters initially propose to offer part of the shares of common stock directly to the public at the public offering price set forth on the cover page of this prospectus. The underwriters may also offer the shares to securities dealers at a price that represents a concession not in excess of $ a share under the public offering price. Any underwriter may allow, and dealers may reallow, a concession not in excess of 99 $ a share to other underwriters or to securities dealers. After the initial offering of the shares of common stock, the offering price and other selling terms may from time to time be changed by the representatives. The U.S. underwriters have an option to purchase from the selling shareholder up to an aggregate of 3,300,000 additional shares of common stock at the public offering price set forth on the cover page of this prospectus, less underwriting discounts and commissions. The U.S. underwriters' option is exercisable for 30 days from the date of this prospectus. The U.S. underwriters may exercise this option only for the purpose of covering over-allotments, if any, made in connection with this offering. If this option is exercised, each U.S. underwriter will become obligated to purchase the same percentage of additional shares of common stock as set forth in the preceding table. If the U.S. underwriter's option is exercised in full, the total price to the public for this offering would be $ , the total underwriting discounts and commissions would be $ and the total proceeds to The Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi would be $ . Each of UnionBanCal Corporation, The Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi and our directors and certain of our executive officers has agreed, subject to limited exceptions relating primarily to the issuance of options or common stock under employee or director benefit plans of which the underwriters have been advised in writing, that it will not, during the period ending 180 days after the date of this prospectus, and Meiji Life Insurance Company has agreed that it will not, during the period ending 90 days after the date of this prospectus, in either case, without the prior written consent of Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated on behalf of the underwriters: - offer, pledge, sell, contract to sell, sell any option or contract to purchase, purchase any option or contract to sell, grant any option, right, or warrant to purchase, lend, or otherwise transfer or dispose of, directly or indirectly, any shares of common stock or any securities convertible into or exercisable or exchangeable for common stock; or - enter into any swap or other arrangement that transfers to another person, in whole or in part, any of the economic consequences of ownership of the common stock, whether any transaction described above is to be settled by delivery of common stock or other securities, in cash, or otherwise. In order to facilitate the offering of our common stock, the underwriters may engage in transactions that stabilize, maintain or otherwise affect the price of our common stock. Specifically, the underwriters may over-allot in connection with the offering, creating a short position in our common stock for their own account. In addition, to cover over-allotments or to stabilize the price of our common stock, the underwriters may bid for, and purchase, shares of common stock in the open market. Finally, the underwriting syndicate may reclaim selling concessions allowed to an underwriter or a dealer for distributing the shares in the offering, if the syndicate repurchases previously distributed shares in transactions to cover syndicate short positions, in stabilization transactions or otherwise. Any of these activities may stabilize or maintain the market price of our common stock above independent market levels. The underwriters are not required to engage in these activities, and may end any of these activities at any time. The underwriters have agreed to reimburse The Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi for a portion of its expenses incurred in connection with this offering. From time to time, some of the U.S. and international underwriters and their affiliates have engaged in, and may in the future engage in, commercial banking and investment banking transactions with us and the selling shareholder and our affiliates. UnionBanCal Corporation, The Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi and the underwriters have agreed to indemnify each other against certain liabilities, including liabilities under the Securities Act. 100 LEGAL MATTERS The validity of the securities being offered hereby is being passed upon for UnionBanCal Corporation by John H. McGuckin, Jr., General Counsel to UnionBanCal Corporation, and other matters for UnionBanCal Corporation will be passed upon by Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP, Los Angeles, California. Matters for the underwriters will be passed upon by Davis Polk & Wardwell. EXPERTS The consolidated financial statements included herein and incorporated in this prospectus by reference from Form 8-K of UnionBanCal Corporation dated February 5, 1999, have been audited by Deloitte & Touche LLP, independent auditors, as stated in their report also included herein and incorporated by reference in this prospectus, and have been so included and incorporated in reliance upon the report of such firm given upon their authority as experts in accounting and auditing. The consolidated financial statements give retroactive effect to the 1996 merger of BanCal Tri-State Corporation and Union Bank which has been accounted for as a pooling-of-interests. The consolidated statements of income, changes in shareholders' equity, and cash flows of Union Bank and subsidiaries for the year ended December 31, 1995 (not presented separately in Form 8-K) were audited by Arthur Andersen LLP, independent public accountants, as stated in their report also included and incorporated by reference herein, in reliance upon the authority of such firm as experts in giving said report. 101 WHERE YOU CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION We file reports, proxy statements, and other information with the SEC. You can read and copy these reports, proxy statements, and other information concerning us at the SEC's Public Reference Room at 450 Fifth Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20549. Please call the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330 for further information on the Public Reference Room. The SEC maintains an internet site at http://www.sec.gov that contains reports, proxy and information statements and other information regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC, including ourselves. Our common stock is quoted on the Nasdaq National Market. These reports, proxy statements and other information are also available for inspection at the offices of the National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc., Report Section, 1735 K Street N.W., Washington, D.C. 20006. This prospectus is part of a registration statement that we filed with the SEC. You can obtain the full registration statement from the SEC as indicated above, or from us. The SEC allows us to "incorporate by reference" the information we file with the SEC. This permits us to disclose important information to you by referring to these filed documents. Any information referred to in this way is considered part of this prospectus, and any information that we file with the SEC after the date of this prospectus will automatically be deemed to update and supersede this information. We incorporate by reference the following documents that have been filed with the SEC: - Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1997 and all amendments thereto (except for Item 8, "Financial Statements and Supplementary Data," which has been updated, included and incorporated by reference elsewhere in this prospectus); - Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q for the quarters ended March 31, 1998, June 30, 1998 and September 30, 1998 and all amendments thereto; - Current Report on Form 8-K dated August 10, 1998; - Current Report on Form 8-K dated December 7, 1998; - Current Report on Form 8-K dated January 11, 1999 (except for Item 7, "Consolidated Financial Statements" and Exhibits which have been updated, included and incorporated by reference in this prospectus); and - Current Report on Form 8-K dated February 5, 1999. We also incorporate by reference any future filings made with the SEC pursuant to Sections 13(a), 13(c), 14 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act until we file a post-effective amendment that indicates the termination of the offering of the securities made by this prospectus. We will provide without charge upon written or oral request, a copy of any or all of the documents that are incorporated by reference into this prospectus. Requests should be directed to Investor Relations, UnionBanCal Corporation, 400 California Street, San Francisco, California 94104 (telephone number 415-765-2969). 102 UNIONBANCAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
PAGE --------- Consolidated Statements of Income for the Years Ended December 31, 1995, 1996 and 1997 and for the Nine Months Ended September 30, 1997 (unaudited) and 1998................................................... F-2 Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 1996 and 1997 and September 30, 1998...................... F-3 Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders' Equity for the Years Ended December 31, 1995, 1996 and 1997 and for the Nine Months Ended September 30, 1998.............................................. F-4 Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended December 31, 1995, 1996 and 1997 and for the Nine Months Ended September 30, 1997 (unaudited) and 1998.............................................. F-5 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements............................................................... F-6 Independent Auditors' Reports............................................................................ F-54
F-1 UNIONBANCAL CORPORATION CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
FOR THE NINE MONTHS YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, (AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE ---------------------------------- ------------------------ DATA) 1995 1996 1997 1998 - ---------------------------------------- ---------- ---------- ---------- 1997 ---------- ----------- (UNAUDITED) INTEREST INCOME Loans................................... $1,613,376 $1,687,977 $1,763,277 $1,311,337 $1,365,285 Securities.............................. 132,802 143,412 167,440 123,075 145,390 Interest bearing deposits in banks...... 58,201 52,709 56,748 43,404 14,187 Federal funds sold and securities purchased under resale agreements..... 22,247 30,246 26,079 18,727 11,784 Trading account assets.................. 20,567 12,960 19,917 13,388 19,976 ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------- ---------- Total interest income............... 1,847,193 1,927,304 2,033,461 1,509,931 1,556,622 ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------- ---------- INTEREST EXPENSE Domestic deposits....................... 358,049 460,130 520,583 386,699 353,283 Foreign deposits........................ 96,109 71,437 75,398 55,156 66,455 Federal funds purchased and securities sold under repurchase agreements...... 78,908 47,095 58,544 44,053 59,667 Commercial paper........................ 86,695 87,411 89,912 66,543 67,719 Subordinated capital notes.............. 42,538 30,104 22,850 17,180 15,883 Other borrowed funds.................... 42,561 62,549 34,492 26,999 13,976 ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------- ---------- Total interest expense.............. 704,860 758,726 801,779 596,630 576,983 ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------- ---------- NET INTEREST INCOME..................... 1,142,333 1,168,578 1,231,682 913,301 979,639 Provision for credit losses............. 53,250 40,000 -- -- 45,000 ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------- ---------- Net interest income after provision for credit losses................. 1,089,083 1,128,578 1,231,682 913,301 934,639 ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------- ---------- NONINTEREST INCOME Service charges on deposit accounts..... 95,177 101,975 114,647 84,699 101,288 Trust and investment management fees.... 87,743 93,479 107,527 76,737 88,806 International commissions and fees...... 68,621 66,108 66,122 49,593 54,516 Merchant transaction processing fees.... 45,767 49,778 57,128 42,653 42,988 Merchant banking fees................... 24,483 23,929 24,924 19,899 24,083 Securities gains (losses), net.......... (702) 4,502 2,711 2,098 5,579 Other................................... 74,230 78,905 89,942 66,948 82,689 ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------- ---------- Total noninterest income............ 395,319 418,676 463,001 342,627 399,949 ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------- ---------- NONINTEREST EXPENSE Salaries and employee benefits.......... 536,671 557,247 571,644 418,970 459,592 Net occupancy........................... 92,863 103,335 85,630 64,133 67,294 Equipment............................... 55,056 55,942 56,137 41,206 41,842 Foreclosed asset expense (income)....... (3,213) 2,889 (1,268) (696) (746) Merger and integration.................. -- 117,464 6,037 6,037 -- Other................................... 296,724 298,027 326,485 232,558 268,196 ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------- ---------- Total noninterest expense........... 978,101 1,134,904 1,044,665 762,208 836,178 ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------- ---------- Income before income taxes.............. 506,301 412,350 650,018 493,720 498,410 Income tax expense...................... 193,359 162,892 238,722 174,869 146,045 ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------- ---------- NET INCOME.............................. $ 312,942 $ 249,458 $ 411,296 $ 318,851 $ 352,365 ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------- ---------- NET INCOME APPLICABLE TO COMMON STOCK... $ 301,637 $ 238,152 $ 403,696 $ 311,251 $ 352,365 ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------- ---------- NET INCOME PER COMMON SHARE -- BASIC(1).............................. $ 1.74 $ 1.37 $ 2.31 $ 1.78 $ 2.01 ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------- ---------- NET INCOME PER COMMON SHARE -- DILUTED(1)............................ $ 1.73 $ 1.36 $ 2.30 $ 1.78 $ 2.01 ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------- ---------- WEIGHTED AVERAGE COMMON SHARES OUTSTANDING -- BASIC(1)............... 173,806 174,391 174,683 174,615 175,091 ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------- ---------- WEIGHTED AVERAGE COMMON SHARES OUTSTANDING -- DILUTED(1)............. 174,099 174,784 175,189 175,071 175,729 ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------- ----------
- ------------ (1) Amounts restated to give retroactive effect to the stock split referred to in Note 1 of the accompanying notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements. F-2 UNIONBANCAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
DECEMBER 31, (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT SHARE ----------------------------- SEPTEMBER 30, DATA) 1996 1997 1998 - ---------------------------------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- ASSETS Cash and due from banks................. $ 2,268,771 $ 2,541,699 $ 2,211,595 Interest bearing deposits in banks...... 1,131,216 633,421 133,165 Federal funds sold and securities purchased under resale agreements..... 537,710 24,335 629,784 ------------- ------------- ------------- Total cash and cash equivalents..... 3,937,697 3,199,455 2,974,544 Trading account assets.................. 465,782 394,313 357,515 Securities available for sale........... 2,164,197 2,538,386 3,200,376 Securities held to maturity (fair value: December 31, 1996, $274,405; December 31, 1997, $193,115; September 30, 1998, $165,807)....................... 268,196 188,775 162,018 Loans (net of allowance for credit losses: December 31, 1996, $523,946; December 31, 1997, $451,692; September 30, 1998, $473,717)................... 20,525,841 22,289,716 23,024,128 Due from customers on acceptances....... 778,378 773,339 464,581 Premises and equipment, net............. 410,621 406,299 407,863 Other assets............................ 683,347 794,982 816,293 ------------- ------------- ------------- Total assets........................ $ 29,234,059 $ 30,585,265 $ 31,407,318 ------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- LIABILITIES Domestic deposits: Noninterest bearing................... $ 7,381,078 $ 8,574,515 $ 9,427,080 Interest bearing...................... 12,607,691 12,666,458 12,379,167 Foreign deposits: Noninterest bearing................... 274,031 275,029 247,038 Interest bearing...................... 1,270,160 1,780,372 1,609,844 ------------- ------------- ------------- Total deposits...................... 21,532,960 23,296,374 23,663,129 Federal funds purchased and securities sold under repurchase agreements...... 1,322,654 1,335,884 1,574,163 Commercial paper........................ 1,495,463 966,575 1,417,077 Other borrowed funds.................... 749,422 476,010 339,340 Acceptances outstanding................. 778,378 773,339 464,581 Other liabilities....................... 478,249 709,784 666,078 Subordinated capital notes.............. 382,000 348,000 298,000 ------------- ------------- ------------- Total liabilities................... 26,739,126 27,905,966 28,422,368 ------------- ------------- ------------- SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY Preferred stock: Authorized 5,000,000 shares 8 3/8% Noncumulative, Series A, issued 1,350,000 shares in 1996............ 135,000 -- -- Common stock(1) -- $1.67 stated value: Authorized 300,000,000 shares, issued 174,457,603 shares as of December 31, 1996, 174,917,674 shares as of December 31, 1997, and 175,208,037 shares as of September 30, 1998..... 290,762 291,529 292,013 Additional paid-in capital.............. 1,413,076 1,422,680 1,430,539 Retained earnings....................... 645,214 957,662 1,233,068 Accumulated other comprehensive income................................ 10,881 7,428 29,330 ------------- ------------- ------------- Total shareholders' equity.......... 2,494,933 2,679,299 2,984,950 ------------- ------------- ------------- Total liabilities and shareholders' equity............................ $ 29,234,059 $ 30,585,265 $ 31,407,318 ------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- -------------
- ------------ (1) Amounts restated to give retroactive effect to the stock split referred to in Note 1 of the accompanying notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements. F-3 UNIONBANCAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, SEPTEMBER ------------------------------------------ 30, (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) 1995 1996 1997 1998 - ---------------------------------------- ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ PREFERRED STOCK Balance, beginning of period............ $ 135,000 $ 135,000 $ 135,000 $ -- Redemption of preferred stock........... -- -- (135,000) -- ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ Balance, end of period................ $ 135,000 $ 135,000 $ -- $ -- ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ COMMON STOCK Balance, beginning of period............ $ 286,739 $ 290,300 $ 290,762 $ 291,529 Dividend reinvestment plan.............. 3,103 121 6 6 Deferred compensation -- restricted stock awards.......................... 379 207 279 281 Stock options exercised................. 79 134 482 197 ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ Balance, end of period................ $ 290,300 $ 290,762 $ 291,529 $ 292,013 ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ADDITIONAL PAID-IN CAPITAL Balance, beginning of period............ $ 1,390,925 $ 1,408,960 $ 1,413,076 $ 1,422,680 Dividend reinvestment plan.............. 15,238 1,041 (43) 10 Deferred compensation -- restricted stock awards.......................... 2,268 2,148 3,478 5,217 Stock options exercised................. 529 927 6,169 2,632 ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ Balance, end of period................ $ 1,408,960 $ 1,413,076 $ 1,422,680 $ 1,430,539 ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ RETAINED EARNINGS Balance, beginning of period............ $ 376,468 $ 626,172 $ 645,214 $ 957,662 Net income(1)........................... 312,942 249,458 411,296 352,365 Dividends on common stock(2)(3)......... (50,989) (73,932) (89,848) (73,632) Dividends on preferred stock............ (11,305) (11,306) (7,600) -- Dividend to MBL......................... -- (144,890) -- -- Deferred compensation -- restricted stock awards.......................... (944) (288) (1,400) (3,327) ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ Balance, end of period................ $ 626,172 $ 645,214 $ 957,662 $ 1,233,068 ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME Balance, beginning of period............ $ (9,930) $ 23,660 $ 10,881 $ 7,428 ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ Net income(1)........................... 312,942 249,458 411,296 352,365 Other comprehensive income.............. 33,590 (12,779) (3,453) 21,902 ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ Total comprehensive income.............. 346,532 236,679 407,843 374,267 Less: net income included in retained earnings.............................. (312,942) (249,458) (411,296) (352,365) ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ Balance, end of period................ $ 23,660 $ 10,881 $ 7,428 $ 29,330 ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ TOTAL SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY $ 2,484,092 $ 2,494,933 $ 2,679,299 $ 2,984,950 ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------
- ------------ (1) Includes dividends applicable to preferred shareholders of $11.3 million for the years ended December 31, 1995 and 1996, respectively, and $7.6 million for the year ended December 31, 1997. (2) Dividends per share in 1996 were based on historical Union Bank common cash dividends declared and did not include the $145 million dividend paid to The Mitsubishi Bank, Limited (MBL) in the first quarter of 1996 by BanCal Tri-State Corporation and The Bank of California, N.A. (3) Dividends per share, after giving effect to the stock split referred to in Note 1 of the accompanying notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, were $0.47 in 1995 and 1996, respectively, $0.51 in 1997, and $0.42 for the nine months ended September 30, 1998, and are based on the Company's shares outstanding as of the declaration date. See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements. F-4 UNIONBANCAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
FOR THE NINE MONTHS YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, --------------------------------------------- ----------------------------- (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) 1995 1996 1997 1997 - ---------------------------------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- 1998 (UNAUDITED) ------------- CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES: Net income............................ $ 312,942 $ 249,458 $ 411,296 $ 318,851 $ 352,365 Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: Provision for credit losses......... 53,250 40,000 -- -- 45,000 Depreciation, amortization and accretion......................... 61,767 65,092 65,469 49,285 50,528 Provision for deferred income taxes............................. 50,841 50,658 59,814 38,734 7,409 (Gain) loss on sales of securities available for sale................ 801 (4,502) (2,711) (2,098) (5,579) Merger and integration costs in excess of (less than) cash utilized.......................... -- 54,344 (31,414) (27,200) (12,350) Net (increase) decrease in trading account assets.................... 82,541 (359,234) 52,743 (40,382) 36,798 Other, net.......................... 157,244 52,101 173,706 92,393 (24,839) ------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- Total adjustments................... 406,444 (101,541) 317,607 110,732 96,967 ------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- Net cash provided by operating activities.......................... 719,386 147,917 728,903 429,583 449,332 ------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES: Proceeds from sales of securities available for sale.................. 240,731 19,536 171,629 3,920 418,456 Proceeds from matured and called securities available for sale....... 764,853 757,463 587,034 326,833 196,358 Purchase of securities available for sale................................ (1,452,339) (995,479) (1,112,080) (777,281) (1,253,529) Proceeds from matured and called securities held to maturity......... 213,337 95,829 79,828 36,121 26,960 Purchase of securities held to maturity............................ (123,886) -- -- -- -- Net increase in loans................. (2,478,608) (741,335) (1,788,179) (1,312,241) (797,343) Other, net............................ (34,902) (54,120) (56,584) (19,986) (42,032) ------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- Net cash used by investing activities........................ (2,870,814) (918,106) (2,118,352) (1,742,634) (1,451,130) ------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES: Net increase in deposits.............. 2,245,306 1,877,917 1,763,414 1,441,228 366,755 Net increase (decrease) in federal funds purchased and securities sold under repurchase agreements......... (287,387) 127,596 13,230 (27,711) 238,279 Net increase (decrease) in commercial paper and other borrowed funds...... 623,612 (201,214) (797,464) 94,601 313,832 Maturity and redemption of subordinated debt................... (154,490) (119,369) (234,000) (200,000) (50,000) Proceeds from issuance of subordinated debt................................ -- -- 200,000 200,000 -- Payments of cash dividends............ (62,044) (222,533) (93,303) (68,787) (73,631) Redemption of preferred stock......... -- -- (135,000) (135,000) -- Repayment of borrowing to support corporate owned life insurance...... (10,638) (95,475) -- -- -- Other, net............................ 485 (882) (2,661) 2,642 2,471 ------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- Net cash provided by financing activities........................ 2,354,844 1,366,040 714,216 1,306,973 797,706 ------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents........................... 203,416 595,851 (675,233) (6,078) (204,092) Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period............................. 3,153,713 3,352,423 3,937,697 3,937,697 3,199,455 Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents.................. (4,706) (10,577) (63,009) (16,910) (20,819) ------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- Cash and cash equivalents at end of period................................ $ 3,352,423 $ 3,937,697 $ 3,199,455 $ 3,914,709 $ 2,974,544 ------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- CASH PAID DURING THE PERIOD FOR: Interest.............................. $ 739,300 $ 764,327 $ 820,355 $ 611,347 $ 588,487 Income taxes.......................... 91,717 172,451 113,588 47,359 189,411 SUPPLEMENTAL SCHEDULE OF NONCASH INVESTING AND FINANCING ACTIVITIES: Loans transferred to foreclosed assets (OREO).............................. $ 48,397 $ 44,557 $ 23,114 $ 19,033 $ 13,882 Securities transferred from held to maturity to available for sale...... 348,717 -- -- -- -- Dividends declared but unpaid......... 12,788 20,383 24,528 24,518 24,529
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements. F-5 UNIONBANCAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS DECEMBER 31, 1995, 1996, AND 1997, AND SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 (UNAUDITED) AND 1998 NOTE 1 -- SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND NATURE OF OPERATIONS UnionBanCal Corporation (a commercial bank holding company) and subsidiaries (the Company), is 82 percent owned by The Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi, Ltd. (BTM) and 18 percent owned by other shareholders. On April 1, 1996, the Company was created by the combination of Union Bank with BanCal Tri-State Corporation and its banking subsidiary, The Bank of California, N.A. The combination was accounted for as a reorganization of entities under common control (similar to a business combination under the pooling of interests method). Accordingly, all historical financial information has been restated as if the combination had been in effect for all periods presented. The merger was effected by the issuance of 54.4 million shares of Union Bank common stock in exchange for all the outstanding common shares of BanCal Tri-State Corporation. Information pertaining to merger and integration expense is presented in Note 7. On August 10, 1998, the Company exchanged 10.2 million shares of its common stock for 7.2 million shares of Union Bank of California, N.A. (the Bank) common stock owned directly by The Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi, Ltd.. This share exchange provided the Company with a 100 percent ownership interest in the Bank. In addition, it increased The Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi, Ltd.'s ownership percentage of the Company to 82 percent from 81 percent. The exchange of shares was accounted for as a reorganization of entities under common control. Accordingly, amounts previously reported as Parent Direct Interest in Bank Subsidiary, including the proportionate share of net income, dividends, and other comprehensive income have been reclassified to combine them with the corresponding amounts attributable to the Company's common shareholders for all periods presented. On November 18, 1998, the Board of Directors approved the declaration of a 3-for-1 stock split effective for shareholders of record on December 7, 1998. Accordingly, all historical financial information has been restated as if the stock split had been in effect for all periods presented. The Company provides a wide range of financial services to consumers, small businesses, middle market companies and major corporations, primarily in California, Oregon and Washington, but also nationally and internationally. BASIS OF FINANCIAL STATEMENT PRESENTATION The accounting and reporting policies of the Company conform to generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) and general practice within the banking industry. Those policies that materially affect the determination of financial position, results of operations, and cash flows are summarized below. The Consolidated Financial Statements include the accounts of the Company. All material intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Certain amounts for prior periods have been reclassified to conform with current financial statement presentation. F-6 UNIONBANCAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED) DECEMBER 31, 1995, 1996, AND 1997, AND SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 (UNAUDITED) AND 1998 NOTE 1 -- SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND NATURE OF OPERATIONS (CONTINUED) The unaudited consolidated financial statements of the Company as of September 30, 1997 have been prepared in accordance with GAAP for interim financial reporting. However, they do not include all of the disclosures necessary for annual financial statements in conformity with GAAP. CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS For purposes of reporting cash flows, cash and cash equivalents include cash and due from banks, interest bearing deposits in banks and federal funds sold and securities purchased under resale agreements, substantially all of which have maturities less than 90 days. TRADING ACCOUNT ASSETS Trading account assets are those financial instruments that management acquires with the intent to hold for short periods of time in order to take advantage of anticipated changes in market values. Substantially all of these assets are securities with a high degree of liquidity and a readily determinable market value. Interest earned, paid, or accrued on trading account assets is included in interest income using a method that generally produces a level yield. Realized gains and losses from the close out of trading account positions and unrealized market value adjustments are recognized in noninterest income. SECURITIES AVAILABLE FOR SALE AND SECURITIES HELD TO MATURITY The Company's securities portfolios consist of debt and equity securities that are classified either as securities available for sale or securities held to maturity. Debt securities for which the Company has the positive intent and ability to hold until maturity are classified as securities held to maturity and carried at amortized cost. Debt securities and equity securities with readily determinable market values that are not classified as either held to maturity securities or trading account assets are classified as securities available for sale and carried at fair value, with the unrealized gains or losses reported net of taxes as a separate component of shareholders' equity until realized. Realized gains and losses arising from the sale of securities are based upon the specific identification method and included in noninterest income as securities gains (losses), net. Interest income on debt securities includes the amortization of premiums and the accretion of discounts using the effective interest method and is included in interest income on securities. Dividend income on equity securities is included in noninterest income. LOANS Loans are reported at the principal amounts outstanding, net of unamortized nonrefundable loan fees and related direct loan origination costs. Deferred net fees and costs are recognized in interest income over the loan term using a method that generally produces a level yield on the unpaid loan balance. Nonrefundable fees and direct loan origination costs related to loans held for sale are deferred and F-7 UNIONBANCAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED) DECEMBER 31, 1995, 1996, AND 1997, AND SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 (UNAUDITED) AND 1998 NOTE 1 -- SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND NATURE OF OPERATIONS (CONTINUED) recognized as a component of the gain or loss on sale. Interest income is accrued principally on a simple interest basis. Nonaccrual loans are those for which management has discontinued accrual of interest because there exists significant uncertainty as to the full and timely collection of either principal or interest or such loans have become contractually past due 90 days with respect to principal or interest. Interest accruals are continued for certain small business loans that are processed centrally, consumer loans, and one-to-four family residential real estate loans. These loans are charged off or written down to their net realizable value based on delinquency time frames that range from 120 to 270 days, depending on the type of credit that has been extended. Interest accruals are also continued for loans that are both well-secured and in the process of collection. For this purpose, loans are considered well-secured if they are collateralized by property having a net realizable value in excess of the amount of principal and accrued interest outstanding or are guaranteed by a financially responsible and willing party. Loans are considered "in the process of collection" if collection is proceeding in due course either through legal action or other actions that are reasonably expected to result in the prompt repayment of the debt or in its restoration to current status. When a loan is placed on nonaccrual, all previously accrued but uncollected interest is reversed against current period operating results. All subsequent payments received are first applied to unpaid principal and then to uncollected interest. Interest income is accrued at such time as the loan is brought fully current as to both principal and interest, and, in management's judgment, such loans are considered to be fully collectible. However, Company policy also allows management to continue the recognition of interest income on certain loans designated as nonaccrual. This portion of the nonaccrual portfolio is referred to as "Cash Basis Nonaccrual" loans. This policy only applies to loans that are well secured and in management's judgment are considered to be fully collectible. Although the accrual of interest is suspended, any payments received may be applied to the loan according to its contractual terms and interest income recognized when cash is received. Loans are considered impaired when, based on current information, it is probable that the Company will be unable to collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement, including interest payments. Impaired loans are carried at the lower of the recorded investment in the loan, the estimated present value of total expected future cash flows, discounted at the loan's effective rate, or the fair value of the collateral, if the loan is collateral dependent. Additionally, some impaired loans with commitments of less than $1 million are aggregated for the purpose of measuring impairment using historical loss factors as a means of measurement. Excluded from the impairment analysis are large groups of smaller balance homogeneous loans such as consumer and residential mortgage loans. Renegotiated loans are those in which the Company has formally restructured a significant portion of the loan. The remaining portion is normally charged off, with a concession either in the form of below market rate financing, or debt forgiveness on the charged off portion. Loans that have been renegotiated and have not met specific performance standards for payment are classified as renegotiated loans within the classification of nonperforming assets. Upon payment performance, such loans may be transferred from nonperforming status to accrual status. F-8 UNIONBANCAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED) DECEMBER 31, 1995, 1996, AND 1997, AND SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 (UNAUDITED) AND 1998 NOTE 1 -- SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND NATURE OF OPERATIONS (CONTINUED) The Company offers primarily two types of leases to customers: 1) direct financing leases where the assets leased are acquired without additional financing from other sources, and 2) leveraged leases where a substantial portion of the financing is provided by debt with no recourse to the Company. Direct financing leases are carried net of unearned income, unamortized nonrefundable fees and related direct costs associated with the origination or purchase of leases. Leveraged leases are carried net of nonrecourse debt. ALLOWANCE FOR CREDIT LOSSES The Company maintains an allowance for credit losses to absorb losses inherent in the loan and lease portfolio. The allowance is based on ongoing, quarterly assessments of the probable estimated losses inherent in the loan and lease portfolio, and to a lesser extent, unused commitments to provide financing. The allowance is increased by the provision for credit losses, which is charged against current period operating results and decreased by the amount of chargeoffs, net of recoveries. The Company's methodology for assessing the appropriateness of the allowance consists of several key elements, which include the formula allowance, specific allowances and the unallocated allowance. The formula allowance is calculated by applying loss factors to outstanding loans and leases and certain unused commitments. Loss factors are based on the Company's historical loss experience and may be adjusted for significant factors that, in management's judgment, affect the collectibility of the portfolio as of the evaluation date. The Company derives the loss factors for problem graded loans from a loss migration model; for pass graded loans by using historical average net chargeoffs during a business cycle, and for pooled loans by using expected net chargeoffs for one year. Pooled loans are homogenous in nature and include consumer installment, residential mortgage, automobile leases and other loans and leases. Specific allowances are established in cases where management has identified significant conditions or circumstances related to a credit that management believes indicate the probability that a loss has been incurred in excess of the amount determined by the application of the formula allowance. The unallocated allowance is composed of two elements. The first element recognizes the model and estimation risk associated with the formula and specific allowances. The second element is based upon management's evaluation of various conditions that are not directly measured in the determination of the formula and specific allowances. The conditions evaluated in connection with the unallocated allowance may include existing general economic and business conditions affecting the key lending areas of the Company, credit quality trends, collateral values, loan volumes and concentrations, seasoning of the loan portfolio, specific industry conditions within portfolio segments, recent loss experience in particular segments of the portfolio, duration of the current business cycle, bank regulatory examination results and findings of the Company's internal credit examiners. The allowance also incorporates the results of measuring impaired loans as provided in Statement of Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 114, "Accounting by Creditors for Impairment of a Loan" and SFAS No. 118, "Accounting by Creditors for Impairment of a Loan--Income Recognition and Disclosures." These accounting standards prescribe the measurement methods, income recognition and disclosures related to impaired loans. A loan is considered impaired when management determines that it F-9 UNIONBANCAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED) DECEMBER 31, 1995, 1996, AND 1997, AND SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 (UNAUDITED) AND 1998 NOTE 1 -- SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND NATURE OF OPERATIONS (CONTINUED) is probable that the Company will be unable to collect all amounts due according to the original contractual terms of the loan agreement. Impairment is measured by the difference between the recorded investment in the loan (including accrued interest, net deferred loan fees or costs and unamortized premium or discount) and the estimated present value of total expected future cash flows, discounted at the loan's effective rate, or the fair value of the collateral, if the loan is collateral dependent. Impairment is recognized by adjusting an allocation of the existing allowance for credit losses. PREMISES AND EQUIPMENT Premises and equipment are carried at cost, less accumulated depreciation and amortization. Depreciation and amortization are calculated using the straight-line method over the estimated useful life of each asset. Lives of premises range from ten to forty years; lives of furniture and equipment range from three to eight years. Leasehold improvements are amortized over the term of the respective lease or 10 years, whichever is shorter. OTHER ASSETS Goodwill represents the excess of purchase price over the fair value of identifiable net assets of acquired companies and is reported as intangible assets. Goodwill is amortized using the straight-line method, generally over 15 years. Other real estate owned (OREO) represents the collateral acquired through foreclosure in full or partial satisfaction of the related loan. OREO is recorded at the lower of the loan's unpaid principal balance or its fair value as established by a current appraisal, adjusted for disposition costs. Any write-down at the date of transfer is charged to the allowance for credit losses. OREO values, recorded in other assets, are reviewed annually and any decline in value is recognized as foreclosed asset expense in the current period. The net operating results from these assets are included in the current period in noninterest expense as foreclosed asset expense (income). DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS HELD FOR TRADING OR CUSTOMER ACCOMMODATION The Company enters into a variety of interest rate derivative contracts, primarily swaps and options and foreign exchange contracts, which include spot, futures, forward, swap and option positions either for trading purposes, based on management's intent at inception, or as an accommodation to customers. Derivatives held or issued for trading or customer accommodation are carried at fair value, with realized and unrealized changes in fair values on contracts included in noninterest income in the period in which the changes occur. Unrealized gains and losses are reported gross and included in trading account assets and other liabilities, respectively. Cash flows are reported net as operating activities. DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS HELD FOR PURPOSES OTHER THAN TRADING The Company enters into a variety of derivative contracts as a means of reducing the Company's interest rate and foreign exchange exposures. At inception these contracts are evaluated in order to determine if they qualify for hedge accounting treatment and are accounted for either on a deferral, F-10 UNIONBANCAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED) DECEMBER 31, 1995, 1996, AND 1997, AND SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 (UNAUDITED) AND 1998 NOTE 1 -- SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND NATURE OF OPERATIONS (CONTINUED) accrual or market value basis, depending on the nature of the Company's hedge strategy and the method used to account for the hedged item. Hedge criteria include demonstrating the manner in which the hedge will reduce risk, identifying the specific asset, liability or firm commitment being hedged, and citing the time horizon being hedged. A monthly evaluation is performed to ensure that continuing correlation exists between the hedge and the item being hedged. Net interest settlements on interest rate swap, cap and floor agreements are recognized on an accrual basis as interest income or expense of the related asset or liability over the lives of the agreements. Premiums paid or received for interest rate caps and floors are amortized either to interest income or to expense of the related asset or liability over the lives of the agreements. If an agreement is terminated early, any resulting gain or loss is deferred and amortized as interest income or expense of the related asset or liability over the remaining life of the original agreement. Net settlement amounts are reported gross as other assets and other liabilities. Cash flows are reported net as operating activities. FOREIGN CURRENCY TRANSLATION Assets, liabilities and results of operations for foreign branches are recorded based on the functional currency of each branch. Since the functional currency of the branches is the local currency, the net assets are re-measured into U.S. dollars using a combination of current and historical exchange rates. The resulting gains or losses are included in shareholders' equity, as a component of other comprehensive income, on a net of tax basis. TRANSFERS AND SERVICING OF FINANCIAL ASSETS AND EXTINGUISHMENT OF LIABILITIES On January 1, 1997, the Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 125, "Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities". The Statement establishes standards for when transfers of financial assets, including those with continuing involvement by the transferor, should be considered a sale. SFAS No. 125 also establishes standards for when a liability should be considered extinguished. This Statement is effective for transfers of assets and extinguishments of liabilities occurring after December 31, 1996 and has been applied prospectively. Certain provisions of SFAS No. 125 were postponed under SFAS No. 127, "Deferral of the Effective Date of Certain Provisions of FASB Statement No. 125". SFAS No. 127 deferred for one year the effective date of implementation for transactions related to repurchase agreements, dollar-roll repurchase agreements, securities lending and similar transactions. Management determined that the effect of adoption of SFAS No. 125 on the Company's financial statements was not material. INCOME TAXES The Company files consolidated federal and combined state income tax returns. Amounts provided for income tax expense are based on income reported for financial statement purposes and do not necessarily represent amounts currently payable under tax laws. Deferred taxes, which arise principally from temporary differences between the period in which certain income and expenses are recognized for financial accounting purposes and the period in which they affect taxable income, are included in the F-11 UNIONBANCAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED) DECEMBER 31, 1995, 1996, AND 1997, AND SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 (UNAUDITED) AND 1998 NOTE 1 -- SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND NATURE OF OPERATIONS (CONTINUED) amounts provided for income taxes. Under this method, the computation of the net deferred tax liability or asset gives current recognition to changes in the tax laws. NET INCOME PER COMMON SHARE Basic earnings per share (EPS) is computed by dividing net income after preferred dividends by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted EPS incorporates the dilutive effect of common stock equivalents outstanding on an average basis during the period. Stock options (see Note 12) are a common stock equivalent. COMPREHENSIVE INCOME The Company has retroactively adopted SFAS No. 130, "Reporting Comprehensive Income", which requires that an enterprise report and display, by major components and as a single total, the change in its net assets during the period from non-owner sources. The adoption of this Statement resulted in a change in the financial statement presentation, but did not have an impact on the Company's consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows. EMPLOYEE BENEFIT AND INCENTIVE PLANS AND OTHER POSTRETIREMENT BENEFITS The Company provides a variety of benefit and incentive compensation plans for eligible employees and retirees. Provisions for the costs of these employee benefit and incentive plans and postretirement benefit plans are accrued and charged to expense when the benefit is earned. During 1998 the Company adopted SFAS No. 132, "Employers' Disclosures about Pensions and Other Postretirement Benefits", and accordingly has revised the disclosures for pensions and other postretirement benefits. Adoption of SFAS No. 132 does not impact the consolidated financial position, results of operations, or cash flows, and any effect is limited to the form and content of its disclosures. As required by the provisions of SFAS No. 132, all prior period data presented has been restated. STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION As allowed under the provisions of SFAS No. 123, "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation", the Company has chosen to continue to recognize compensation expense using the intrinsic value-based method of valuing stock options prescribed in Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, "Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees" and related Interpretations. Under the intrinsic value-based method, compensation cost is measured as the amount by which the quoted market price of the Company's stock at the date of grant exceeds the stock option exercise price. Compensation cost associated with the Company's unvested restricted stock issued under the management stock plan is measured based on the market price of the stock at the grant date and is expensed over the vesting period. F-12 UNIONBANCAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED) DECEMBER 31, 1995, 1996, AND 1997, AND SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 (UNAUDITED) AND 1998 NOTE 1 -- SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND NATURE OF OPERATIONS (CONTINUED) RECENTLY ISSUED ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS In June 1997, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued SFAS No. 131, "Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information", which establishes annual and interim reporting standards for an enterprise's operating segments and related disclosures about its products, services, geographic areas, and major customers. Adoption of this Statement will not impact the Company's consolidated financial position, results of operations, or cash flows, and any effect will be limited to the form and content of its disclosures. The Statement is effective with the year-end 1998 financial statements. In June 1998, the FASB issued SFAS No. 133, "Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities". The Statement will require the Company to recognize all derivatives on the balance sheet at fair value. SFAS No. 133 requires that derivative instruments used to hedge be identified specifically to assets, liabilities, firm commitments or anticipated transactions and measured as effective and ineffective when hedging changes in fair value or cash flows. Derivative instruments that do not qualify as either a fair value or cash flow hedge will be valued at fair value with the resultant gain or loss recognized in current earnings. Changes in the effective portion of fair value hedges will be recognized in current earnings along with the change in fair value of the hedged item. Changes in the effective portion of the fair value of cash flow hedges will be recognized in other comprehensive income until realization of the cash flows of the hedged item through current earnings. Any ineffective portion of hedges will be recognized in current earnings. Management believes that, depending upon the accumulated net gain or loss of the effective portion of cash flow hedges at the date of adoption, the impact of SFAS No. 133 could have a material impact on other comprehensive income. However, Management believes that any ineffective portion of cash flow hedges or any other hedges will not have a material impact on the Company's financial position or results of operations. This Statement is effective for fiscal years beginning after June 15, 1999, with earlier application encouraged. The Company expects to adopt SFAS No. 133 as of January 1, 2000. In October 1998, the FASB issued SFAS No. 134, "Accounting for Mortgage-Backed Securities Retained after the Securitization of Mortgage Loans Held for Sale by a Mortgage Banking Enterprise". This Statement amends SFAS No. 65, "Accounting for Certain Mortgage Banking Activities", which established accounting and reporting standards for certain activities of mortgage banking and other similar enterprises. After securitization of mortgage loans held for sale, SFAS No. 134 requires an entity to classify the resulting mortgage-backed securities or other retained interests, based on its ability or intent to sell or hold those investments. Management believes that the adoption of SFAS No. 134 will have no impact on the Company's financial position or results of operations. This Statement is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 1998, with earlier application permitted. The Company expects to adopt SFAS No. 134 on January 1, 1999. In March 1998, the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) issued Statement of Position (SOP) 98-1, "Accounting for the Costs of Computer Software Developed or Obtained for Internal Use". SOP 98-1 requires the capitalization of eligible costs of specified activities related to computer software developed or obtained for internal use. Management believes that the adoption of SOP 98-1 will not have a material effect on the Company's financial position or results of operations. The Statement is F-13 UNIONBANCAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED) DECEMBER 31, 1995, 1996, AND 1997, AND SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 (UNAUDITED) AND 1998 NOTE 1 -- SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND NATURE OF OPERATIONS (CONTINUED) effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 1998, with earlier adoption encouraged. The Company expects to adopt SOP 98-1 on January 1, 1999. In June 1998, the AICPA issued SOP 98-5, "Reporting on the Costs of Start-Up Activities". SOP 98-5 requires that entities expense start-up costs and organization costs as they are incurred. Management believes that the adoption of SOP 98-5 will not have a material effect on the Company's financial position or results of operations. The Statement is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 1998, with earlier adoption encouraged. The Company expects to adopt SOP 98-5 on January 1, 1999. F-14 UNIONBANCAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED) DECEMBER 31, 1995, 1996, AND 1997, AND SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 (UNAUDITED) AND 1998 NOTE 2 -- SECURITIES The amortized cost, gross unrealized gains, gross unrealized losses, and fair values of securities are presented below. SECURITIES AVAILABLE FOR SALE
DECEMBER 31, 1996 ---------------------------------------------------- GROSS GROSS AMORTIZED UNREALIZED UNREALIZED FAIR (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) COST GAINS LOSSES VALUE - ------------------------------------------------------------- ------------ ----------- ----------- ------------ U.S. Treasury................................................ $ 1,137,992 $ 4,993 $ 1,933 $ 1,141,052 Other U.S. government........................................ 687,717 4,993 779 691,931 Mortgage-backed securities................................... 193,531 400 274 193,657 State and municipal.......................................... 101,006 13,749 -- 114,755 Corporate debt securities.................................... -- -- -- -- Equity securities............................................ 19,041 2,553 -- 21,594 Foreign securities........................................... 1,136 72 -- 1,208 ------------ ----------- ----------- ------------ Total securities available for sale........................ $ 2,140,423 $ 26,760 $ 2,986 $ 2,164,197 ------------ ----------- ----------- ------------ ------------ ----------- ----------- ------------
DECEMBER 31, 1997 ---------------------------------------------------- GROSS GROSS AMORTIZED UNREALIZED UNREALIZED FAIR (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) COST GAINS LOSSES VALUE - ------------------------------------------------------------- ------------ ----------- ----------- ------------ U.S. Treasury................................................ $ 987,374 $ 10,793 $ 170 $ 997,997 Other U.S. government........................................ 709,536 6,005 67 715,474 Mortgage-backed securities................................... 679,692 3,331 265 682,758 State and municipal.......................................... 90,937 13,236 -- 104,173 Corporate debt securities.................................... 2,698 311 1 3,008 Equity securities............................................ 28,881 1,596 672 29,805 Foreign securities........................................... 5,132 39 -- 5,171 ------------ ----------- ----------- ------------ Total securities available for sale........................ $ 2,504,250 $ 35,311 $ 1,175 $ 2,538,386 ------------ ----------- ----------- ------------ ------------ ----------- ----------- ------------
SEPTEMBER 30, 1998 ---------------------------------------------------- GROSS GROSS AMORTIZED UNREALIZED UNREALIZED FAIR (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) COST GAINS LOSSES VALUE - ------------------------------------------------------------- ------------ ----------- ----------- ------------ U.S. Treasury................................................ $ 757,831 $ 20,162 $ -- $ 777,993 Other U.S. government........................................ 806,573 17,703 -- 824,276 Mortgage-backed securities................................... 1,459,141 18,466 -- 1,477,607 State and municipal.......................................... 83,018 12,580 -- 95,598 Corporate debt securities.................................... 8,069 -- -- 8,069 Equity securities............................................ 15,055 139 -- 15,194 Foreign securities........................................... 1,594 45 -- 1,639 ------------ ----------- ----------- ------------ Total securities available for sale........................ $ 3,131,281 $ 69,095 $ -- $ 3,200,376 ------------ ----------- ----------- ------------ ------------ ----------- ----------- ------------
F-15 UNIONBANCAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED) DECEMBER 31, 1995, 1996, AND 1997, AND SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 (UNAUDITED) AND 1998 NOTE 2 -- SECURITIES (CONTINUED) SECURITIES HELD TO MATURITY
DECEMBER 31, 1996 ------------------------------------------------ GROSS GROSS AMORTIZED UNREALIZED UNREALIZED FAIR (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) COST GAINS LOSSES VALUE - ----------------------------------------------------------------- ---------- ----------- ----------- ---------- U.S. Treasury.................................................... $ 50,109 $ 1,735 $ -- $ 51,844 Other U.S. government............................................ 139,188 4,412 -- 143,600 Mortgage-backed securities....................................... 41,985 2,019 68 43,936 State and municipal.............................................. 36,914 310 2,199 35,025 ---------- ----------- ----------- ---------- Total securities held to maturity.............................. $ 268,196 $ 8,476 $ 2,267 $ 274,405 ---------- ----------- ----------- ---------- ---------- ----------- ----------- ----------
DECEMBER 31, 1997 ------------------------------------------------ GROSS GROSS AMORTIZED UNREALIZED UNREALIZED FAIR (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) COST GAINS LOSSES VALUE - ----------------------------------------------------------------- ---------- ----------- ----------- ---------- U.S. Treasury.................................................... $ 40,092 $ 1,333 $ -- $ 41,425 Other U.S. government............................................ 99,520 2,568 -- 102,088 Mortgage-backed securities....................................... 24,477 1,745 14 26,208 State and municipal.............................................. 24,686 75 1,367 23,394 ---------- ----------- ----------- ---------- Total securities held to maturity.............................. $ 188,775 $ 5,721 $ 1,381 $ 193,115 ---------- ----------- ----------- ---------- ---------- ----------- ----------- ----------
SEPTEMBER 30, 1998 -------------------------------------------------- GROSS GROSS AMORTIZED UNREALIZED UNREALIZED FAIR (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) COST GAINS LOSSES VALUE - ----------------------------------------------------------------- ---------- ----------- ------------- ---------- U.S. Treasury.................................................... $ 40,054 $ 1,324 $ -- $ 41,378 Other U.S. government............................................ 89,707 2,090 -- 91,797 Mortgage-backed securities....................................... 16,651 1,252 -- 17,903 State and municipal.............................................. 15,606 -- 877 14,729 ---------- ----------- ----- ---------- Total securities held to maturity.............................. $ 162,018 $ 4,666 $ 877 $ 165,807 ---------- ----------- ----- ---------- ---------- ----------- ----- ----------
F-16 UNIONBANCAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED) DECEMBER 31, 1995, 1996, AND 1997, AND SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 (UNAUDITED) AND 1998 NOTE 2 -- SECURITIES (CONTINUED) The amortized cost and fair value of securities, by contractual maturity, are shown below. Expected maturities may differ from contractual maturities because borrowers may have the right to call or prepay obligations, with or without call or prepayment penalties. MATURITY SCHEDULE OF SECURITIES
SECURITIES SECURITIES AVAILABLE FOR SALE(1) HELD TO MATURITY(1) -------------------------- ---------------------- SEPTEMBER 30, 1998 SEPTEMBER 30, 1998 -------------------------- ---------------------- AMORTIZED FAIR AMORTIZED FAIR (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) COST VALUE COST VALUE - ------------------------------------------------------------- ------------ ------------ ---------- ---------- Due in one year or less...................................... $ 503,104 $ 508,419 $ 69,875 $ 71,232 Due after one year through five years........................ 1,192,511 1,227,837 62,361 64,459 Due after five years through ten years....................... 334,509 341,550 3,902 4,041 Due after ten years.......................................... 1,086,102 1,107,376 25,880 26,075 Equity securities............................................ 15,055 15,194 -- -- ------------ ------------ ---------- ---------- Total securities......................................... $ 3,131,281 $ 3,200,376 $ 162,018 $ 165,807 ------------ ------------ ---------- ---------- ------------ ------------ ---------- ----------
- --------- (1) The remaining contractual maturities of mortgage-backed securities were allocated assuming no prepayments. The contractual maturity of these securities is not a reliable indicator of their expected life because borrowers have the right to repay their obligations at any time. During the quarter ended December 31, 1995, in accordance with guidance issued by the FASB, the Company reclassified from securities held to maturity to securities available for sale approximately $285 million at amortized cost of U.S. Treasury Notes (fair value $285 million) and $64 million at amortized cost of municipal bonds (fair value $72 million). During the years ended December 31, 1996 and 1997, and during the nine months ended September 30, 1997 and 1998, there were no sales or transfers from the securities held to maturity portfolio. In 1995, proceeds from sales of securities available for sale were $241 million with gross realized gains of $2 million and gross realized losses of $3 million. In 1996, proceeds from sales of securities available for sale were $20 million with gross realized gains of $5 million and no gross realized losses. In 1997, proceeds from sales of securities available for sale were $172 million with gross realized gains of $3 million and no gross realized losses. For the nine months ended September 30, 1997, proceeds from sales of securities available for sale were $4 million with gross realized gains of $2 million and no gross realized losses. For the nine months ended September 30, 1998, proceeds from sales of securities available for sale were $418 million with gross realized gains of $6 million and no gross realized losses. F-17 UNIONBANCAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED) DECEMBER 31, 1995, 1996, AND 1997, AND SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 (UNAUDITED) AND 1998 NOTE 3 -- LOANS AND ALLOWANCE FOR CREDIT LOSSES A summary of loans net of unearned interest and fees of $150 million, $128 million and $127 million at December 31, 1996 and 1997, and September 30, 1998, respectively, is as follows:
DECEMBER 31, ---------------------------- SEPTEMBER 30, (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) 1996 1997 1998 - -------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- Domestic: Commercial, financial and industrial.............................. $ 9,495,592 $ 10,747,179 $ 12,151,210 Construction...................................................... 357,817 293,333 420,267 Mortgage: Residential..................................................... 2,960,908 2,961,233 2,742,451 Commercial...................................................... 2,597,616 2,951,807 2,980,371 ------------- ------------- ------------- Total mortgage................................................ 5,558,524 5,913,040 5,722,822 Consumer: Installment..................................................... 2,063,434 2,090,752 2,026,441 Home equity..................................................... 1,113,269 992,916 844,256 Credit card and other lines of credit........................... 303,235 270,097 -- ------------- ------------- ------------- Total consumer................................................ 3,479,938 3,353,765 2,870,697 Lease financing................................................... 800,048 874,860 1,013,772 ------------- ------------- ------------- Total loans in domestic offices............................... 19,691,919 21,182,177 22,178,768 Loans originated in foreign branches................................ 1,357,868 1,559,231 1,319,077 ------------- ------------- ------------- Total loans................................................... 21,049,787 22,741,408 23,497,845 Allowance for credit losses................................. 523,946 451,692 473,717 ------------- ------------- ------------- Loans, net.................................................... $ 20,525,841 $ 22,289,716 $ 23,024,128 ------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- -------------
Changes in the allowance for credit losses were as follows:
FOR THE NINE MONTHS YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, ------------------------------------- ----------------------- (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) 1995 1996 1997 1997 1998 - ------------------------------------------------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ---------- (UNAUDITED) Balance, beginning of period..................... $ 563,142 $ 555,149 $ 523,946 $ 523,946 $ 451,692 Loans charged off................................ (133,599) (119,100) (122,779) (86,585) (53,138) Loan loss recoveries............................. 72,403 48,024 51,014 41,219 32,158 ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ---------- Total net loans charged off.................... (61,196) (71,076) (71,765) (45,366) (20,980) Provision for credit losses...................... 53,250 40,000 -- -- 45,000 Transfer of reserve for trading account assets... -- -- -- -- (1,911) Foreign translation adjustment and other net deductions..................................... (47) (127) (489) (126) (84) ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ---------- Balance, end of period........................... $ 555,149 $ 523,946 $ 451,692 $ 478,454 $ 473,717 ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ---------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------
F-18 UNIONBANCAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED) DECEMBER 31, 1995, 1996, AND 1997, AND SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 (UNAUDITED) AND 1998 NOTE 3 -- LOANS AND ALLOWANCE FOR CREDIT LOSSES (CONTINUED) In 1998, the Company reclassified a $1.9 million previously established reserve for credit losses related to interest rate derivatives and foreign exchange contracts from the unallocated portion of the allowance for credit losses. The reserve for derivative and foreign exchange contracts is presented as an offset to trading account assets. Future changes in the reserve as a result of changes in the positive replacement cost of those contracts will be provided as an offset to trading gains and losses. Nonaccrual loans totaled $128 million, $109 million and $68 million at December 31, 1996 and 1997, and September 30, 1998, respectively. There were no renegotiated loans at December 31, 1996 and 1997, and September 30, 1998. Interest foregone on loans designated as nonaccrual at December 31, 1995, 1996 and 1997, and at September 30, 1997 and 1998 was $18 million, $9 million, $6 million, $5 million and $3 million, respectively. LOAN IMPAIRMENT Impaired loans of the Company include commercial, financial and industrial, construction and commercial mortgage loans designated as nonaccrual. When the value of an impaired loan is less than the recorded investment in the loan, a portion of the Company's allowance for credit losses is allocated as an impairment allowance. The Company's policy for recognition of interest income, charge-offs of loans, and application of payments on impaired loans is the same as the policy applied to nonaccrual loans. The following table sets forth information about the Company's impaired loans at the dates indicated.
DECEMBER 31, ---------------------------------- SEPTEMBER 30, (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) 1995 1996 1997 1998 - -------------------------------------------------------------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ------------- Impaired loans with an allowance.............................. $ 58,584 $ 69,886 $ 59,351 $ 40,288 Impaired loans without an allowance(1)........................ 114,611 43,962 49,033 27,594 ---------- ---------- ---------- ------------- Total impaired loans(2)..................................... $ 173,195 $ 113,848 $ 108,384 $ 67,882 ---------- ---------- ---------- ------------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ------------- Allowance for impaired loans.................................. $ 15,837 $ 21,260 $ 9,418 $ 7,470 Average balance of impaired loans during the year............. $ 277,955 $ 145,351 $ 120,096 $ 98,700
- --------- (1) These loans do not require an allowance for credit losses since the fair values of the impaired loans equal or exceed the recorded investments in the loans. (2) This amount was evaluated for impairment using three measurement methods as follows: $64 million, $38 million, $27 million, and $40 million was evaluated using the present value of the expected future cash flows at December 31, 1995, 1996 and 1997, and September 30, 1998, respectively; $95 million, $45 million, $53 million, and $8 million was evaluated using the fair value of the collateral at December 31, 1995, 1996 and 1997, and September 30, 1998, respectively; $14 million, $31 million, $28 million, and $20 million was evaluated using historical loss factors at December 31, 1995, 1996 and 1997, and September 30, 1998, respectively. F-19 UNIONBANCAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED) DECEMBER 31, 1995, 1996, AND 1997, AND SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 (UNAUDITED) AND 1998 NOTE 3 -- LOANS AND ALLOWANCE FOR CREDIT LOSSES (CONTINUED) Interest income recognized on nonaccrual loans was $11 million, $5 million, $3 million, $3 million, and $1 million for the years ended December 31, 1995, 1996 and 1997, and for the nine months ended September 30, 1997 and 1998, respectively. RELATED PARTY LOANS The Company in some cases makes loans to related parties including its directors, executive officers and their affiliated companies. At December 31, 1996, related party loans outstanding to individuals who served as directors or executive officers at anytime during the year totaled $79 million as compared to $38 million and $54 million at December 31, 1997 and September 30, 1998, respectively. In the opinion of management, these related party loans were made on substantially the same terms, including interest rates and collateral requirements, as those terms prevailing at the date these loans were made. During the years ended December 31, 1996 and 1997, and the nine months ended September 30, 1998, there were no loans to related parties which were charged off. Additionally, at December 31, 1996 and 1997, and September 30, 1998, there were no loans to related parties which were nonperforming. NOTE 4 -- PREMISES AND EQUIPMENT Premises and equipment are carried at cost, less accumulated depreciation and amortization. As of December 31, 1996 and 1997, and September 30, 1998, the amounts were:
DECEMBER 31, -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1996 1997 SEPTEMBER 30, 1998 ------------------------------------ ------------------------------------ ----------------------- ACCUMULATED ACCUMULATED ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION DEPRECIATION DEPRECIATION AND NET BOOK AND NET BOOK AND (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) COST AMORTIZATION VALUE COST AMORTIZATION VALUE COST AMORTIZATION - ------------------------ --------- ------------ ----------- --------- ------------ ----------- --------- ------------ Land.................... $ 73,309 $ -- $ 73,309 $ 69,290 $ -- $ 69,290 $ 68,598 $ -- Premises................ 264,545 98,785 165,760 253,752 101,997 151,755 252,489 105,754 Leasehold improvements.. 124,065 75,264 48,801 135,609 80,019 55,590 140,347 83,249 Furniture, fixtures and equipment............. 362,063 239,312 122,751 400,774 271,110 129,664 428,656 293,224 --------- ------------ ----------- --------- ------------ ----------- --------- ------------ Total................. $ 823,982 $ 413,361 $ 410,621 $ 859,425 $ 453,126 $ 406,299 $ 890,090 $ 482,227 --------- ------------ ----------- --------- ------------ ----------- --------- ------------ --------- ------------ ----------- --------- ------------ ----------- --------- ------------ NET BOOK (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) VALUE - ------------------------ ----------- Land.................... $ 68,598 Premises................ 146,735 Leasehold improvements.. 57,098 Furniture, fixtures and equipment............. 135,432 ----------- Total................. $ 407,863 ----------- -----------
F-20 UNIONBANCAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED) DECEMBER 31, 1995, 1996, AND 1997, AND SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 (UNAUDITED) AND 1998 NOTE 4 -- PREMISES AND EQUIPMENT (CONTINUED) Rental, depreciation and amortization expense were as follows:
NINE MONTHS ENDED YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, SEPTEMBER 30, ------------------------------- ---------------------- (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) 1995 1996 1997 1997 1998 - -------------------------------------------------------- --------- --------- --------- ----------- --------- (UNAUDITED) Rental expense of premises.............................. $ 53,493 $ 66,189 $ 46,556 $ 34,955 $ 37,824 Less: rental income..................................... 11,050 11,904 11,049 8,363 8,638 --------- --------- --------- ----------- --------- Net rental expense.................................... $ 42,443 $ 54,285 $ 35,507 $ 26,592 $ 29,186 --------- --------- --------- ----------- --------- --------- --------- --------- ----------- --------- Other net rental expense (income), primarily for equipment............................................. $ 2,705 $ 2,218 $ 298 $ 262 $ (269) --------- --------- --------- ----------- --------- --------- --------- --------- ----------- --------- Depreciation and amortization of premises and equipment............................................. $ 49,036 $ 51,821 $ 53,652 $ 39,843 $ 41,643 --------- --------- --------- ----------- --------- --------- --------- --------- ----------- ---------
Future minimum operating lease payments are as follows.
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) - ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Three months ending December 31, 1998............................................. $ 12,716 Years ending December 31, 1999............................................................................ 49,473 2000............................................................................ 45,214 2001............................................................................ 42,314 2002............................................................................ 34,594 2003............................................................................ 29,857 Later years..................................................................... $ 120,318 ---------- Total minimum operating lease payments............................................ $ 334,486 ---------- ---------- Minimum rental income due in the future under noncancellable subleases............ $ 48,923 ---------- ----------
Included in other liabilities in the accompanying September 30, 1998 Consolidated Balance Sheet is $11 million of future operating lease payments accrued in connection with the Merger (also see Note 7). A majority of the leases provide for the payment of taxes, maintenance, insurance and certain other expenses applicable to the leased premises. Many of the leases contain extension provisions, escalation clauses and purchase options. There are no restrictions on paying dividends, incurring additional debt or negotiating additional leases under the terms of the present lease agreements. NOTE 5 -- DEPOSITS At September 30, 1998, the Company had $397 million in domestic interest bearing time deposits with a remaining term of greater than one year, of which $108 million exceeded $100,000. Maturity information F-21 UNIONBANCAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED) DECEMBER 31, 1995, 1996, AND 1997, AND SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 (UNAUDITED) AND 1998 NOTE 5 -- DEPOSITS (CONTINUED) for all domestic interest bearing time deposits with a remaining term of greater than one year is summarized below.
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) SEPTEMBER 30, 1998 - -------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ Due after one year through two years...................................... $ 187,900 Due after two years through three years................................... 88,373 Due after three years through four years.................................. 76,538 Due after four years through five years................................... 36,941 Due after five years...................................................... 6,794 -------- Total................................................................... $ 396,546 -------- --------
Substantially all of the foreign interest bearing time deposits exceeding $100,000 mature in less than one year. NOTE 6 -- EMPLOYMENT BENEFIT AND INCENTIVE PLANS AND OTHER POSTRETIREMENT BENEFITS RETIREMENT PLANS The Company maintains the Union Bank of California, N.A. Retirement Plan (the Plan), which is a noncontributory defined benefit plan covering substantially all of the employees of the Company. The plan provides retirement benefits based on years of credited service and the final average compensation amount, as defined in the Plan. Employees become eligible for this plan after one year of service and become fully vested after five years of service. The Company's funding policy is to make contributions equal to the maximum deductible amount as allowed by the Internal Revenue Code. Contributions are intended to provide not only for benefits attributed to services to date, but also for those expected to be earned in the future. Plan assets are invested in U.S. government securities, corporate bonds, and commingled investment funds. In 1996, the Company maintained a second plan for former BanCal Tri-State Corporation employees. The plan which was terminated effective January 1, 1997, was a defined contribution plan. The Company's expense for pension contributions for the year ended December 31, 1996 was $5 million. OTHER POSTRETIREMENT BENEFITS The Company provides certain health care and life insurance benefits for its retired employees. The health care cost is shared between the Company and the retiree. The life insurance plan is noncontributory. The accounting for the health care plan anticipates future cost-sharing changes to the written plan that are consistent with the Company's intent to maintain a level of cost-sharing at approximately 25 percent. Assets set aside to cover such obligations are primarily invested in mutual funds. F-22 UNIONBANCAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED) DECEMBER 31, 1995, 1996, AND 1997, AND SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 (UNAUDITED) AND 1998 NOTE 6 -- EMPLOYMENT BENEFIT AND INCENTIVE PLANS AND OTHER POSTRETIREMENT BENEFITS (CONTINUED) The following table sets forth the funded status of the Company's defined benefit pension plan and its other postretirement benefit plans.
PENSION BENEFITS OTHER BENEFITS ------------------------------------- ------------------------------------- YEARS ENDED DECEMBER FOR THE NINE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER FOR THE NINE 31, MONTHS ENDED 31, MONTHS ENDED ---------------------- SEPTEMBER 30, ---------------------- SEPTEMBER 30, (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) 1996 1997 1998 1996 1997 1998 - --------------------------------------------- ---------- ---------- ------------- ---------- ---------- ------------- CHANGE IN BENEFIT OBLIGATION Benefit obligation, beginning of period...... $ 298,597 $ 323,646 $ 400,958 $ 76,728 $ 80,274 $ 79,308 Service cost................................. 12,651 20,667 17,023 1,741 3,123 2,300 Interest cost................................ 22,043 25,049 21,356 5,581 5,150 3,801 Plan participants' contributions............. -- -- -- 798 570 706 Amendments................................... -- 10,926 -- -- -- -- Actuarial (gain) loss........................ 422 31,588 48,822 32 (5,452) (309) Benefits paid................................ (10,067) (10,918) (9,335) (4,606) (4,357) (3,828) ---------- ---------- ------------- ---------- ---------- ------------- Benefit obligation, end of period............ $ 323,646 $ 400,958 $ 478,824 $ 80,274 $ 79,308 $ 81,978 ---------- ---------- ------------- ---------- ---------- ------------- CHANGE IN PLAN ASSETS Fair value of plan assets, beginning of period..................................... $ 332,412 $ 381,194 $ 460,501 $ 16,690 $ 21,703 $ 31,136 Actual return on plan assets................. 44,642 66,765 10,354 2,590 4,445 (577) Employer contribution........................ 14,207 23,460 23,234 6,509 8,775 8,025 Plan participants' contributions............. -- -- -- 520 570 706 Benefits paid................................ (10,067) (10,918) (9,335) (4,606) (4,357) (3,828) ---------- ---------- ------------- ---------- ---------- ------------- Fair value of plan assets, end of period..... $ 381,194 $ 460,501 $ 484,754 $ 21,703 $ 31,136 $ 35,462 ---------- ---------- ------------- ---------- ---------- ------------- Funded status................................ $ 57,548 $ 59,543 $ 5,930 $ (58,571) $ (48,172) $ (46,516) Unrecognized transition amount............... -- -- -- 63,800 59,813 56,822 Unrecognized net actuarial (gain) loss....... (29,660) (37,717) 24,184 (14,829) (21,119) (17,482) Unrecognized prior service cost.............. 4,806 12,705 9,740 -- -- -- ---------- ---------- ------------- ---------- ---------- ------------- Prepaid (accrued) benefit cost............... $ 32,694 $ 34,531 $ 39,854 $ (9,600) $ (9,478) $ (7,176) ---------- ---------- ------------- ---------- ---------- ------------- ---------- ---------- ------------- ---------- ---------- -------------
F-23 UNIONBANCAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED) DECEMBER 31, 1995, 1996, AND 1997, AND SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 (UNAUDITED) AND 1998 NOTE 6 -- EMPLOYMENT BENEFIT AND INCENTIVE PLANS AND OTHER POSTRETIREMENT BENEFITS (CONTINUED) The following table summarizes the assumptions used in computing the present value of the projected benefit obligation and the net pension expense.
PENSION BENEFITS OTHER BENEFITS -------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------ YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, FOR THE NINE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, MONTHS ENDED ------------------------------------- SEPTEMBER 30, ------------------------ 1995 1996 1997 1998 1995 1996 ----- ----- ----- ----------------- ----- ----- Discount rate in determining expense...... 7.50% 7.50% 7.50% 7.00% 7.50% 7.50% Discount rate in determining benefit obligations at end of period............ 7.50 7.50 7.00 6.50 7.50 7.50 Rate of increase in future compensation levels for determining expense.......... 5.50 5.50 5.50 5.00 -- -- Rate of increase in future compensation levels for determining benefit obligations at end of period............ 5.50 5.50 5.00 5.00 -- -- Expected return on plan assets............ 8.25 8.25 8.25 8.25 8.00 8.00 FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 1998 ----- ----------------- Discount rate in determining expense...... 7.00% 6.50% Discount rate in determining benefit obligations at end of period............ 7.00 6.50 Rate of increase in future compensation levels for determining expense.......... -- -- Rate of increase in future compensation levels for determining benefit obligations at end of period............ -- -- Expected return on plan assets............ 8.00 8.00
The following table sets forth the components of postretirement benefit expense.
OTHER BENEFITS PENSION BENEFITS ------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------- FOR THE NINE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, MONTHS ENDED ------------------------------- SEPTEMBER 30, ------------------------------- (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) 1995 1996 1997 1998 1995 1996 1997 - ------------------------------------ --------- --------- --------- ------------- --------- --------- --------- COMPONENTS OF NET PERIODIC BENEFIT COST Service cost........................ $ 10,516 $ 12,651 $ 20,667 $ 17,023 $ 1,792 $ 1,741 $ 3,123 Interest cost....................... 19,637 22,043 25,049 21,356 6,091 5,581 5,150 Expected return on plan assets...... (21,018) (23,877) (27,119) (23,736) (885) (1,335) (1,736) Amortization of prior service cost.............................. 2,108 2,108 3,175 2,381 -- -- -- Amortization of transition amount... (149) (149) (149) (112) 3,988 3,988 3,987 Recognized net actuarial (gain) loss.............................. -- -- -- 998 (881) (846) (1,870) --------- --------- --------- ------------- --------- --------- --------- Net periodic benefit cost......... $ 11,094 $ 12,776 $ 21,623 $ 17,910 $ 10,105 $ 9,129 $ 8,654 --------- --------- --------- ------------- --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- ------------- --------- --------- --------- FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) 1998 - ------------------------------------ --------------- COMPONENTS OF NET PERIODIC BENEFIT COST Service cost........................ $ 2,300 Interest cost....................... 3,801 Expected return on plan assets...... (1,868) Amortization of prior service cost.............................. -- Amortization of transition amount... 2,990 Recognized net actuarial (gain) loss.............................. (1,500) ------- Net periodic benefit cost......... $ 5,723 ------- -------
For 1995, the former Union Bank assumed a 9 percent annual rate of increase in the per capita cost of postretirement medical benefits for the indemnity plan and a 4 percent annual rate of increase was assumed for the HMO plan. For future periods the assumed rate for the indemnity plan gradually decreased from 9 percent to 5.5 percent in 2007 and remained level thereafter. The assumed rate of change on the HMO plan increased for the remainder of the decade, then gradually decreased to 5.5 percent in the year 2007 and thereafter. For 1995, former BanCal Tri-State Corporation assumed an 11.5 percent annual rate of increase in the per capita cost of postretirement medical benefits for the indemnity plan. For future periods, the assumed F-24 UNIONBANCAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED) DECEMBER 31, 1995, 1996, AND 1997, AND SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 (UNAUDITED) AND 1998 NOTE 6 -- EMPLOYMENT BENEFIT AND INCENTIVE PLANS AND OTHER POSTRETIREMENT BENEFITS (CONTINUED) rate for the indemnity plan gradually decreased from 11.5 percent to 5.5 percent in 2003 and remained level thereafter. For 1996, the Company assumed a 9 percent annual rate of increase in the per capita cost of postretirement medical benefits for the indemnity plan and a 4 percent annual rate of increase was assumed for the HMO plan. For future periods the assumed rate for the indemnity plan gradually decreased from 9 percent to 5.5 percent in 2007 and remained level thereafter. The assumed rate of change on the HMO plan increased to 7 percent in 1997 and then gradually decreased to 5.5 percent in the year 2007 and thereafter. For 1997, the Company assumed a 9 percent annual rate of increase in the per capita cost of postretirement medical benefits for the indemnity plan and a 4 percent annual rate of increase was assumed for the health maintenance organization (HMO) plan. For future periods, the rate for the indemnity plan was expected to gradually decrease from 9 percent to 5.5 percent in 2007 and remain at that level thereafter. The rate for the HMO plan was expected to increase after one year of being at a low rate and then gradually decrease to 5.5 percent in the year 2007 and thereafter. For 1998, the Company assumed a 9 percent annual rate of increase in the per capita cost of postretirement medical benefits for the indemnity plan and a 7 percent annual rate of increase was assumed for the health maintenance organization (HMO) plan. For future periods, the rate for the indemnity plan was expected to gradually decrease from 9 percent to 5.5 percent in 2007 and remain at that level thereafter. The rate for the HMO plan was expected to gradually decrease to 5.5 percent in the year 2007 and remain at that level thereafter. The healthcare cost trend rate assumption has a significant effect on the amounts reported for the health care plans. A one-percentage point change in assumed health care cost trend rates would have the following effects.
1-PERCENTAGE- 1-PERCENTAGE- (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) POINT INCREASE POINT DECREASE - ------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------- --------------- Effect on total of service and interest cost components.................. $ 788 $ (699) Effect on postretirement benefit obligation.............................. 9,479 (7,915)
EXECUTIVE SUPPLEMENTAL BENEFIT PLANS The Company has several Executive Supplemental Benefit Plans (ESBP) which provide eligible employees with supplemental retirement benefits. The plans are unfunded. The accrued liability for ESBP's included in other liabilities in the Consolidated Balance Sheets was $23 million and $25 million for the years ended December 31, 1996 and 1997, and $25 million for the period ended September 30, 1998. The Company's expense relating to the ESBP's was $3 million for each of the years ended December 31, 1995, 1996 and 1997 and $2 million for the period ended September 30, 1998. F-25 UNIONBANCAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED) DECEMBER 31, 1995, 1996, AND 1997, AND SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 (UNAUDITED) AND 1998 NOTE 6 -- EMPLOYMENT BENEFIT AND INCENTIVE PLANS AND OTHER POSTRETIREMENT BENEFITS (CONTINUED) SECTION 401(k) SAVINGS PLANS The Company has a defined contribution plan authorized under Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code. All benefits-eligible employees with at least one year of service are eligible to participate in the plan. Employees may contribute up to 16 percent of their pre-tax covered compensation or up to 10 percent of their after-tax covered compensation through salary deductions. The Company contributes 50 percent of every pre-tax dollar an employee contributes up to the first 6 percent of the employee's pre-tax covered compensation. Effective January 1, 1997, employees are fully vested in the employer's contributions immediately. In addition, the Company may make a discretionary annual profit-sharing contribution up to 2.5 percent of an employee's pay. This profit-sharing contribution is for all eligible employees, regardless of whether an employee is participating in the 401(k) plan, and depends on the Bank's annual financial performance. All employer contributions are tax deductible by the Company. The Company's combined matching contribution expense was $9 million, $9 million, $13 million and $9.5 million for the years ended December 31, 1995, 1996 and 1997 and the period ended September 30, 1998, respectively. In February 1998, the FASB issued SFAS No. 132, "Employers' Disclosures about Pensions and Other Postretirement Benefits." SFAS No. 132 revised the disclosures for pensions and other postretirement benefits. Adoption of SFAS No. 132 did not impact the Company's consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows, and any effect was limited to the form and content of its disclosures. SFAS No. 132 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 1997. NOTE 7 -- OTHER EXPENSES The detail of other expenses is as follows:
FOR THE NINE MONTHS YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, ---------------------------------- ----------------------- (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) 1995 1996 1997 1997 1998 - --------------------------------------------------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------- ---------- (UNAUDITED) Data processing.................................... $ 18,557 $ 22,140 $ 25,973 $ 19,115 $ 20,462 Advertising and public relations................... 20,911 28,788 28,664 20,759 22,419 Printing and office supplies....................... 22,626 27,085 24,098 17,646 19,112 Regulatory assessments............................. 23,431 4,048 5,778 4,281 4,561 Professional services.............................. 26,197 24,342 28,075 19,062 25,186 Merchant transaction processing fees............... 31,288 37,091 42,274 31,269 33,008 Communications..................................... 35,806 40,133 42,372 31,135 31,515 Other.............................................. 117,908 114,400 129,251 89,291 111,933 ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------- ---------- Total other expenses............................. $ 296,724 $ 298,027 $ 326,485 $ 232,558 $ 268,196 ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------- ----------
F-26 UNIONBANCAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED) DECEMBER 31, 1995, 1996, AND 1997, AND SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 (UNAUDITED) AND 1998 NOTE 7 -- OTHER EXPENSES (CONTINUED) In connection with the Merger, the Company incurred merger and integration expense of $117 million and $6 million for the years ended 1996 and 1997 and none for the nine months ended September 30, 1998, as summarized in the following table.
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER FOR THE NINE MONTHS 31, ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, --------------------- ---------------------- (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) 1996 1997 1997 1998 - ------------------------------------------------------------------ ---------- --------- ----------- --------- (UNAUDITED) Balance, accrued merger and integration expense, beginning of period.......................................................... $ -- $ 54,344 $ 54,344 $ 22,930 Provision for merger and integration costs........................ 117,464 6,037 6,037 -- Utilization: Cash............................................................ 40,155 35,809 32,351 2,901 Noncash......................................................... 22,965 1,642 886 9,449 ---------- --------- ----------- --------- Total utilization............................................. 63,120 37,451 33,237 12,350 ---------- --------- ----------- --------- Balance, accrued merger and integration expense, end of period.... $ 54,344 $ 22,930 $ 27,144 $ 10,580 ---------- --------- ----------- --------- ---------- --------- ----------- ---------
Total merger and integration expense of $124 million was recorded to cover $38 million of personnel expense for severance, retention and other employee related costs, $54 million for facilities expense related to redundant banking facilities, and $32 million in professional services and other expense. At September 30, 1998 the liability balance included amounts primarily for operating lease payments related to redundant banking facilities which are continuing over the expected term of the leases. F-27 UNIONBANCAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED) DECEMBER 31, 1995, 1996, AND 1997, AND SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 (UNAUDITED) AND 1998 NOTE 8 -- INCOME TAXES The components of income tax expense (benefit) were as follows:
NINE MONTHS ENDED YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, SEPTEMBER 30, ---------------------------------- ----------------------- (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) 1995 1996 1997 1997 1998 - --------------------------------------------------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------- ---------- (UNAUDITED) Taxes currently payable: Federal.......................................... $ 96,732 $ 86,159 $ 168,375 $ 133,625 $ 176,517 State............................................ 42,356 23,180 8,441 870 (40,741) Foreign.......................................... 3,430 2,895 2,092 1,640 2,860 ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------- ---------- Total currently payable........................ 142,518 112,234 178,908 136,135 138,636 ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------- ---------- Taxes deferred: Federal.......................................... 34,839 47,575 49,437 34,451 9,780 State............................................ 16,005 3,455 10,499 4,283 (2,371) Foreign.......................................... (3) (372) (122) -- -- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------- ---------- Total deferred................................. 50,841 50,658 59,814 38,734 7,409 ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------- ---------- Total income tax expense....................... $ 193,359 $ 162,892 $ 238,722 $ 174,869 $ 146,045 ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------- ----------
The components of the net deferred tax balances of the Company were as follows:
DECEMBER 31, ---------------------- SEPTEMBER 30, (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) 1996 1997 1998 - -------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------- ---------- ------------- Deferred tax assets: Allowance for credit losses............................................. $ 195,128 $ 169,769 $ 182,125 Accrued income & expense................................................ 31,964 21,987 39,863 Accrued merger expense.................................................. 22,051 15,641 8,006 Deferred state taxes.................................................... 13,572 21,063 3,101 Other................................................................... 2,567 7,585 6,930 ---------- ---------- ------------- Total deferred tax assets............................................. 265,282 236,045 240,025 ---------- ---------- ------------- Deferred tax liabilities: Leasing................................................................. 276,922 297,891 317,263 Depreciation............................................................ 13,809 17,192 9,151 Unrealized gain on securities available for sale........................ 9,711 13,536 27,342 ---------- ---------- ------------- Total deferred tax liabilities........................................ 300,442 328,619 353,756 ---------- ---------- ------------- Net deferred tax liability.......................................... $ 35,160 $ 92,574 $ 113,731 ---------- ---------- ------------- ---------- ---------- -------------
F-28 UNIONBANCAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED) DECEMBER 31, 1995, 1996, AND 1997, AND SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 (UNAUDITED) AND 1998 NOTE 8 -- INCOME TAXES (CONTINUED) The following table is an analysis of the effective tax rate.
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, ------------------------------------- ----------------- 1995 1996 1997 ----- ----- ----- 1997 ----------------- (UNAUDITED) Federal income tax rate............................................... 35% 35% 35% 35% Net tax effects of: State income taxes, net of federal income tax benefit............... 5 4 2 1 Tax-exempt interest income.......................................... (1) (1) (1) (1) Amortization of intangibles......................................... 1 1 1 1 Other............................................................... (2) 1 -- (1) -- -- -- -- Effective tax rate................................................ 38% 40% 37% 35% -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 1998 ----- Federal income tax rate............................................... 35% Net tax effects of: State income taxes, net of federal income tax benefit............... (6) Tax-exempt interest income.......................................... (1) Amortization of intangibles......................................... 1 Other............................................................... -- -- Effective tax rate................................................ 29% -- --
During 1997, the Company received a refund from the State of California Franchise Tax Board of approximately $25 million (net of federal taxes of $17 million) in settlement of litigation, administration and audit disputes covering the years 1975-1987. The refund was recorded as a reduction to state income tax expense. During the nine months ended September 30, 1998, a reduction in state income tax liabilities of approximately $52 million, net of federal tax, was recorded. Of the $52 million reduction, $29 million related to the reversal of previously accrued 1997 state income tax liabilities and $23 million related to a lower tax provision in 1998. The decrease in the effective tax rate in 1998 resulted from the Company's ability to file California franchise tax returns on a worldwide unitary basis, which incorporates the financial results of The Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi, Ltd. and its worldwide affiliates. Federal and state tax returns for several years are under or subject to examination by the respective taxing authorities. Although the ultimate outcome of such examinations cannot be determined at this time, management believes that the resolution of issues that have been or may be raised will not have a material adverse effect on the Company's consolidated financial position, cash flows or results of operations. F-29 UNIONBANCAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED) DECEMBER 31, 1995, 1996, AND 1997, AND SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 (UNAUDITED) AND 1998 NOTE 9 -- BORROWED FUNDS The following is a summary of the major categories of borrowed funds.
DECEMBER 31, -------------------------- SEPTEMBER 30, (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) 1996 1997 1998 - ------------------------------------------------------------- ------------ ------------ ------------- Federal funds purchased and securities sold under repurchase agreements with weighted average interest rates of 5.09%, 5.38%, and 5.42% at December 31, 1996 and 1997, and September 30, 1998, respectively........................... $ 1,322,654 $ 1,335,884 $ 1,574,163 Commercial paper, with weighted average interest rates of 5.34%, 5.64%, and 5.46% at December 31, 1996 and 1997, and September 30, 1998, respectively........................... 1,495,463 966,575 1,417,077 Other borrowed funds, with weighted average interest rates of 5.66%, 6.23%, and 6.03% at December 31, 1996 and 1997, and September 30, 1998, respectively........................... 749,422 476,010 339,340 ------------ ------------ ------------- Total borrowed funds..................................... $ 3,567,539 $ 2,778,469 $ 3,330,580 ------------ ------------ ------------- ------------ ------------ ------------- Federal funds purchased and securities sold under repurchase agreements: Maximum outstanding at any month end....................... $ 1,322,654 $ 1,575,930 $ 1,797,737 Average balance during the period.......................... 933,433 1,097,707 1,481,809 Weighted average interest rate during the period........... 5.05% 5.33% 5.38% Commercial paper: Maximum outstanding at any month end....................... $ 1,854,576 $ 1,876,135 $ 1,918,700 Average balance during the period.......................... 1,620,087 1,637,070 1,641,425 Weighted average interest rate during the period........... 5.40% 5.49% 5.52% Other borrowed funds: Maximum outstanding at any month end....................... $ 1,697,236 $ 851,694 $ 438,151 Average balance during the period.......................... 1,119,051 635,900 323,082 Weighted average interest rate during the period........... 5.59% 5.42% 5.78%
F-30 UNIONBANCAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED) DECEMBER 31, 1995, 1996, AND 1997, AND SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 (UNAUDITED) AND 1998 NOTE 10 -- SUBORDINATED CAPITAL NOTES AND PREFERRED STOCK The following is a summary of capital notes which are subordinated to other obligations of the Company.
DECEMBER 31, ---------------------- SEPTEMBER 30, (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) 1996 1997 1998 - ---------------------------------------------------------------- ---------- ---------- ------------- Floating rate notes due June 2007. These notes bear interest at 0.325% above 3-month London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR) and are payable to The Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi, Ltd.............. $ -- $ 200,000 $ 200,000 Floating rate notes due July 2000. These notes bear interest at 0.30% above 3-month LIBOR..................................... 98,000 98,000 98,000 Floating rate notes due July 1997 and July 1998. These notes bear interest at 0.25% above 3-month LIBOR and are payable to The Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi, Ltd............................. 100,000 50,000 -- 8.00% fixed rate notes due February 2002. The notes were called at par on February 25, 1997................................... 100,000 -- -- 6.67% fixed rate notes due August 2002. The notes were called at par on August 20, 1997........................................ 50,000 -- -- Fixed rate and floating rate notes matured in October 1997, with $23,000 bearing interest at fixed rates of 10.05% to 10.14% and notes totaling $11,000 bearing interest at 0.375% above 3-month LIBOR................................................. 34,000 -- -- ---------- ---------- ------------- Total subordinated capital notes............................ $ 382,000 $ 348,000 $ 298,000 ---------- ---------- ------------- ---------- ---------- -------------
All of the above notes qualify as Tier 2 risk-based capital under the Federal Reserve guidelines for assessing regulatory capital. For the total risk-based capital ratio, the amount of notes which qualify as capital is reduced as the notes approach maturity. At December 31, 1996 and 1997, and September 30, 1998, $219 million, $239 million and $220 million, respectively, of the notes qualified as risk-based capital. Provisions of several of the notes restrict the use of the Company's property as security for borrowings, and place limitations on leases, indebtedness, distributions to shareholders, mergers, sales of certain assets, transactions with affiliates and changes in majority stock ownership of the Company. The following table presents the maturities of subordinated capital notes.
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) - ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Years ending December 31, 2000............................................................................ $ 98,000 Years after 2003................................................................ 200,000 ---------- Total......................................................................... $ 298,000 ---------- ----------
F-31 UNIONBANCAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED) DECEMBER 31, 1995, 1996, AND 1997, AND SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 (UNAUDITED) AND 1998 NOTE 10 -- SUBORDINATED CAPITAL NOTES AND PREFERRED STOCK (CONTINUED) At December 31, 1996, the Company had outstanding 1,350,000 shares (or 5,400,000 depositary shares) of 8 3/8% Noncumulative Preferred Stock, Series A (Preferred Stock) totaling $135 million. On September 3, 1997, the Company redeemed all 1,350,000 outstanding shares of its Preferred Stock, reducing shareholders' equity by $135 million. The redemption price was equal to the stated value of $100 per share of Preferred Stock (equivalent to $25 per depositary share), plus $2 million in accrued and unpaid dividends to the redemption date. The redemption was funded by proceeds from the issuance of $200 million in subordinated capital notes in June 1997. NOTE 11 -- DIVIDEND REINVESTMENT AND STOCK PURCHASE PLAN The Company has a dividend reinvestment and stock purchase plan for shareholders. The plan allows shareholders to automatically reinvest all or part of their dividends in additional shares of the Company's common stock at a cost of 5 percent below the market price. Participating shareholders also have the option of purchasing additional shares at full market price with cash payments of $25 to $3,000 per quarter. The Company obtains shares required for reinvestment through open market purchases or by the issuance of new shares from its authorized but unissued stock. During the years ended December 31, 1995, 1996, and 1997, 1,862,034; 155,724 and 131,127 shares, respectively, were required for dividend reinvestment purposes, of which 1,862,034; 71,706 and 3,687 shares were considered new issuances, respectively. For the nine months ended September 30, 1997 and 1998, 112,383 and 64,488 shares, respectively, were required for dividend reinvestment purposes, of which 1,443 and 3,738 shares were considered new issuances, respectively. The Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi, Ltd. discontinued its participation in the plan after the quarter ended March 31, 1995 and did not participate in the plan as of September 30, 1998. NOTE 12 -- MANAGEMENT STOCK PLAN The Company has a management stock plan (the Stock Plan) which has 6,600,000 shares of the Company's common stock authorized to be awarded to key employees and outside directors of the Company and its subsidiaries at the discretion of the Executive Compensation and Benefits Committee of the Board of Directors (the Committee). The combined number of shares that are granted under the Stock Plan cannot exceed 6,600,000 shares of the Company's common stock. Committee members and employees on rotational assignment from The Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi, Ltd. are not eligible for stock awards. The Committee determines the term of each stock option grant, up to a maximum of ten years from the date of grant. The exercise price of the options issued under the Stock Plan shall not be less than the fair market value on the date the option is granted. Unvested restricted stock issued under the Stock Plan is shown as a reduction to retained earnings. The value of the restricted shares at the date of grant is amortized to compensation expense over its vesting period. All cancelled or forfeited options and restricted stock become available for future grants. In the years ended 1995, 1996 and 1997, and the nine months ended September 30, 1997 and 1998, the Company granted options to various key employees, including principal officers, under the Stock Plan. The stock options vest pro rata on each anniversary of the grant date and become fully exercisable three years from the grant date, provided that the employee has completed the specified continuous service requirement. They vest earlier if the employee dies, is permanently and totally disabled, or retires under certain grant, age and service conditions. F-32 UNIONBANCAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED) DECEMBER 31, 1995, 1996, AND 1997, AND SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 (UNAUDITED) AND 1998 NOTE 12 -- MANAGEMENT STOCK PLAN (CONTINUED) The following is a summary of stock option transactions under the Stock Plan.
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1995 1996 1997 ----------------------------- ----------------------------- ----------------------------- NUMBER OF WEIGHTED-AVERAGE NUMBER OF WEIGHTED-AVERAGE NUMBER OF WEIGHTED-AVERAGE SHARES EXERCISE PRICE SHARES EXERCISE PRICE SHARES EXERCISE PRICE ---------- ----------------- ---------- ----------------- ---------- ----------------- Options outstanding, beginning of year..................... 740,502 $ 9.94 1,082,106 $ 10.42 1,263,807 $ 12.13 Granted..................... 389,100 11.25 277,200 18.29 441,900 22.13 Exercised................... (47,496) 9.83 (80,496) 10.69 (289,029) 10.84 Forfeited................... -- -- (15,003) -- (19,500) 22.13 ---------- ---------- ------ ---------- Options outstanding, end of year........................ 1,082,106 $ 10.42 1,263,807 $ 12.13 1,397,178 $ 15.41 ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- Options exercisable, end of year........................ 407,466 $ 9.78 686,145 $ 10.38 712,107 $ 11.50 ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, ------------------------------------------------------------ 1997 1998 ----------------------------- ----------------------------- NUMBER OF WEIGHTED-AVERAGE NUMBER OF WEIGHTED-AVERAGE SHARES EXERCISE PRICE SHARES EXERCISE PRICE ---------- ----------------- ---------- ----------------- (UNAUDITED) Options outstanding, beginning of period.................... 1,263,807 $ 12.13 1,397,178 $ 15.41 Granted...................... 441,900 22.13 533,850 35.08 Exercised.................... (220,332) 10.88 (118,245) 12.12 Forfeited.................... (19,500) 22.13 (9,501) 30.03 ---------- ---------- Options outstanding, end of period....................... 1,465,875 $ 15.19 1,803,282 $ 21.38 ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- Options exercisable, end of period....................... 753,303 $ 11.18 938,679 $ 13.72 ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
The weighted-average fair value of options granted was $3.13, $6.00, and $6.94 for the years ended 1995, 1996 and 1997, respectively, and $6.94 and $11.99 for the nine months ended September 30, 1997 and 1998. F-33 UNIONBANCAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED) DECEMBER 31, 1995, 1996, AND 1997, AND SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 (UNAUDITED) AND 1998 NOTE 12 -- MANAGEMENT STOCK PLAN (CONTINUED) The following table summarizes information about stock options outstanding.
OPTIONS OUTSTANDING AT SEPTEMBER 30, 1998 OPTIONS EXERCISABLE AT ------------------------------------------------ SEPTEMBER 30, 1998 WEIGHTED-AVERAGE ------------------------------ RANGE OF NUMBER REMAINING WEIGHTED-AVERAGE NUMBER WEIGHTED-AVERAGE EXERCISE PRICES OUTSTANDING CONTRACTUAL LIFE EXERCISE PRICE EXERCISABLE EXERCISE PRICE - ------------------- ----------- ---------------- ----------------- ----------- ----------------- $6.67-9.08 229,008 4.5 years $ 8.54 229,008 $ 8.54 11.25-12.83 403,254 5.6 11.78 403,254 11.78 18.29-22.13 643,470 7.7 20.72 306,417 20.15 35.08 527,550 9.6 35.08 -- -- ----------- ----------- 1,803,282 938,679 ----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
In the years ended 1995, 1996 and 1997, and nine months ended September 30, 1997 and 1998, the Company also granted 231,210, 133,440, 178,320, 176,970 and 181,785 shares, respectively, of restricted stock to key officers, including executive officers, under the Stock Plan. The awards of restricted stock vest pro rata on each anniversary of the grant date and become fully vested four years from the grant date, provided that the employee has completed the specified continuous service requirement. They vest earlier if the employee dies, is permanently and totally disabled, or retires under certain grant, age and service conditions. Restricted shareholders have the right to vote their restricted shares and receive dividends. F-34 UNIONBANCAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED) DECEMBER 31, 1995, 1996, AND 1997, AND SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 (UNAUDITED) AND 1998 NOTE 12 -- MANAGEMENT STOCK PLAN (CONTINUED) The following is a summary of restricted stock transaction under the Stock Plan.
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1995 1996 1997 ----------------------------- ----------------------------- ----------------------------- WEIGHTED-AVERAGE WEIGHTED-AVERAGE WEIGHTED-AVERAGE NUMBER OF GRANT DATE NUMBER OF GRANT DATE NUMBER OF GRANT DATE SHARES FAIR VALUE SHARES FAIR VALUE SHARES FAIR VALUE ---------- ----------------- ---------- ----------------- ---------- ----------------- Restricted stock awards outstanding, beginning of year......................... 817,608 $ 8.25 1,044,951 $ 8.99 1,166,820 $ 10.04 Granted..................... 231,210 11.61 133,440 18.29 178,320 22.18 Cancelled................... (3,867) 9.72 (11,571) 10.78 (7,923) 20.08 ---------- ---------- ---------- Restricted stock awards outstanding, end of year..... 1,044,951 $ 8.99 1,166,820 $ 10.04 1,337,217 $ 11.59 ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- Restricted stock awards vested, end of year.......... 568,449 $ 7.81 764,670 $ 8.35 942,738 $ 9.17 ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, ------------------------------------------------------------ 1997 1998 ----------------------------- ----------------------------- WEIGHTED-AVERAGE WEIGHTED-AVERAGE NUMBER OF GRANT DATE NUMBER OF GRANT DATE SHARES FAIR VALUE SHARES FAIR VALUE ---------- ----------------- ---------- ----------------- (UNAUDITED) Restricted stock awards outstanding, beginning of period....................... 1,166,820 $ 10.04 1,337,217 $ 11.59 Granted..................... 176,970 22.13 181,785 33.46 Cancelled................... (4,845) 19.98 (13,404) 22.61 ---------- ---------- Restricted stock awards outstanding, end of period... 1,338,945 11.60 1,505,598 14.13 ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- Restricted stock awards vested, end of period........ 932,856 9.10 1,105,791 10.07 ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
At December 31, 1995, 1996 and 1997, and September 30, 1997 and 1998, 1,342,449, 958,383, 3,365,586, 3,363,858, and 2,672,856 shares, respectively, were available for future grants as either stock options or restricted stock under the Stock Plan. The Company follows the intrinsic value based method in accounting for its employee stock-based compensation plan. Accordingly, no compensation cost has been recognized for its stock option grants. Had compensation cost for the Company's stock-based plan been determined based on the fair value at the grant dates for awards under that plan consistent with the method of SFAS No. 123, "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation", the Company's net income and net income per share would have decreased to the F-35 UNIONBANCAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED) DECEMBER 31, 1995, 1996, AND 1997, AND SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 (UNAUDITED) AND 1998 NOTE 12 -- MANAGEMENT STOCK PLAN (CONTINUED) pro forma amounts indicated in the following table. Options that were granted prior to January 1, 1995 with vesting periods in 1995 and later are excluded from the pro forma results indicated for 1996 and 1995 in the following table.
NINE MONTHS YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE ---------------------------------- ----------------------- DATA) 1995 1996 1997 1998 - -------------------------------------------- ---------- ---------- ---------- 1997 ---------- ----------- (UNAUDITED) Net income.................. As reported $ 312,942 $ 249,458 $ 411,296 $ 318,851 $ 352,365 Pro forma 312,691 248,874 410,068 317,771 350,257 Net income applicable to common stock............... As reported $ 301,637 $ 238,152 $ 403,696 $ 311,251 $ 352,365 Pro forma 301,386 237,568 402,468 310,171 350,257 Net income per common share -- basic................... As reported $ 1.74 $ 1.37 $ 2.31 $ 1.78 $ 2.01 Pro forma 1.73 1.36 2.30 1.78 2.00 Net income per common share -- diluted................. As reported $ 1.73 $ 1.36 $ 2.30 $ 1.78 $ 2.01 Pro forma 1.73 1.36 2.30 1.77 1.99
The fair value of each option grant is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following weighted-average assumptions used for grants made in the years ended 1995, 1996 and 1997, and nine months ended September 30, 1997 and 1998: risk-free interest rates of 7.1%, 6.3%, 6.6%, 6.6% and 5.8% in the years ended 1995, 1996 and 1997 and nine months ended September 30, 1997 and 1998, respectively; expected volatility of 28%, 28%, 26%, 26% and 29% in the years ended 1995, 1996 and 1997, and the nine months ended September 30, 1997 and 1998, respectively; expected lives of 7 years for the years ended 1995 and 1996, respectively, and 6 years for the year ended 1997 and nine months ended September 30, 1997 and 1998; and expected dividend yields of 4.2%, 2.6%, 2.1%, 2.1% and 1.5% in the years ended 1995, 1996 and 1997, and nine months ended September 30, 1997 and 1998, respectively. Effective January 1, 1997, the Company established a Performance Share Plan. Eligible participants may earn performance share awards to be redeemed in cash three years after the date of grant. Performance shares are linked to shareholder value in two ways: (1) the market price of the Company's common stock, and (2) return on assets, a performance measure closely linked to value creation. Eligible participants generally receive grants of performance shares annually. The total number of performance shares granted under the plan cannot exceed 600,000 and the Company granted 14,400 and 24,900 shares in the year ended 1997 and nine months ended September 30, 1998, respectively. For the nine months ended September 30, 1998, 2,400 performance shares were forfeited. The value of a performance share is equal to the market price of the Company's common stock. All cancelled or forfeited performance shares become available for future grants. F-36 UNIONBANCAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED) DECEMBER 31, 1995, 1996, AND 1997, AND SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 (UNAUDITED) AND 1998 NOTE 13 -- FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS The fair value of a financial instrument is the amount which would be exchanged between willing parties, other than in a forced or liquidation sale. All of the fair values presented below are as of their respective period ends and have been made under this definition of fair value unless otherwise disclosed. It is management's belief that the fair values presented below are reasonable based on the valuation techniques and data available to the Company as of December 31, 1996 and 1997, and September 30, 1998, as more fully described below. It should be noted that the operations of the Company are managed on a going concern basis and not a liquidation basis. As a result, the ultimate value realized for the financial instruments presented could be substantially different when actually recognized over time through the normal course of operations. Additionally, a substantial portion of an institution's inherent value is its capitalization and franchise value. Neither of these components have been given consideration in the presentation of fair values which follow. The table below presents the carrying value and fair value of the specified assets and liabilities held by the Company.
DECEMBER 31, ------------------------------------------------------------- 1996 1997 ----------------------------- ----------------------------- CARRYING CARRYING (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) VALUE FAIR VALUE VALUE FAIR VALUE - ---------------------------------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- ASSETS Cash and cash equivalents............... $ 3,937,697 $ 3,937,697 $ 3,199,455 $ 3,199,455 Trading account assets.................. 465,782 465,782 394,313 394,313 Securities available for sale........... 2,164,197 2,164,197 2,538,386 2,538,386 Securities held to maturity............. 268,196 274,405 188,775 193,115 Loans, net of allowance for credit losses(1)............................. 19,725,793 20,003,603 21,414,856 21,636,650 LIABILITIES Deposits: Noninterest bearing................... 7,655,109 7,655,109 8,849,544 8,849,544 Interest bearing...................... 13,877,851 13,885,504 14,446,830 14,453,029 ------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- Total deposits...................... 21,532,960 21,540,613 23,296,374 23,302,573 Borrowed funds.......................... 3,567,539 3,567,836 2,778,469 2,775,531 Subordinated capital notes.............. 382,000 388,388 348,000 348,000 SEPTEMBER 30, 1998 ----------------------------- CARRYING (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) VALUE FAIR VALUE - ---------------------------------------- ------------- ------------- ASSETS Cash and cash equivalents............... $ 2,974,544 $ 2,974,544 Trading account assets.................. 357,515 357,515 Securities available for sale........... 3,200,376 3,200,376 Securities held to maturity............. 162,018 165,807 Loans, net of allowance for credit losses(1)............................. 22,010,357 22,821,780 LIABILITIES Deposits: Noninterest bearing................... 9,674,118 9,674,118 Interest bearing...................... 13,989,011 14,001,157 ------------- ------------- Total deposits...................... 23,663,129 23,675,275 Borrowed funds.......................... 3,330,580 3,328,780 Subordinated capital notes.............. 298,000 298,000
- --------- (1) Excludes the book value of leases of $800 million, $875 million and $1,014 million at December 31, 1996 and 1997, and September 30, 1998, respectively. The Company is also a party to financial instruments that are not reflected on the balance sheet but represent obligations of the Company in the normal course of business. For information regarding the fair value of off-balance sheet financial instruments, see Note 14. The following methods and assumptions were used to estimate fair value of each class of financial instruments for which it is practicable to estimate that value. CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS: The book value of cash and cash equivalents is considered a reasonable estimate of fair value. F-37 UNIONBANCAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED) DECEMBER 31, 1995, 1996, AND 1997, AND SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 (UNAUDITED) AND 1998 NOTE 13 -- FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS (CONTINUED) TRADING ACCOUNT ASSETS: Trading account assets are short term in nature and valued at market based on quoted market prices or dealer quotes. If a quoted market price is not available, the recorded amounts are estimated using quoted market prices for similar securities. Thus, carrying value is considered a reasonable estimate of fair value for these financial instruments. SECURITIES: The fair value of securities is based on quoted market prices or dealer quotes. If a quoted market price is not available, fair value is estimated using quoted market prices for similar securities. Available for sale securities are carried at their aggregate fair value, while held to maturity securities are carried at amortized cost. LOANS: The fair value for performing fixed and non-reference rate loans was estimated by discounting the future cash flows using the current rates at which similar loans would be made to borrowers with similar credit ratings and for similar remaining maturities. The fair value of performing loans tied to the Company's reference rate with normal credit risk is assumed to approximate their book value. The fair value for these floating rate loans with increasing credit risk was estimated by calculating their present value using a yield the Company would currently require for loans with similar terms to borrowers with similar credit quality. Loans which are on nonaccrual status were not included in the loan valuation methods discussed previously. The fair value of these assets was estimated assuming these loans were sold on a liquidation basis. The fair value of performing mortgage loans was based on quoted market prices for loans with similar credit and interest rate risk characteristics. The fair value of performing credit card loans and credit lines is assumed to approximate their book value. The fair value was estimated for credit lines which were past due at December 31, 1996 and 1997, and September 30, 1998, and credit card loans which were past due at December 31, 1996 and 1997, by segregating them according to their past due status and then discounting them based on the Company's historical probability of loss. NONINTEREST BEARING DEPOSITS: The fair value of noninterest bearing deposits is the amount payable on demand at the reporting date. The fair value of the demand deposit intangible has not been estimated. INTEREST BEARING DEPOSITS: The fair value of savings accounts and certain money market accounts is the amount payable on demand at the reporting date. The fair value of fixed maturity certificates of deposit was estimated using rates currently being offered on certificates with similar maturities. BORROWED FUNDS: The book values of federal funds purchased, securities sold under repurchase agreements and other short-term borrowings are assumed to approximate their fair value due to their limited duration characteristics. The fair value for commercial paper and term federal funds purchased was estimated using market quotes. F-38 UNIONBANCAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED) DECEMBER 31, 1995, 1996, AND 1997, AND SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 (UNAUDITED) AND 1998 NOTE 13 -- FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS (CONTINUED) SUBORDINATED CAPITAL NOTES: The fair value of fixed-rate subordinated capital notes was estimated using discounted cash flows based on market rates for A-rated bank borrowings. The book values for variable-rate subordinated capital notes are assumed to approximate fair market value. NOTE 14 -- DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS AND OTHER FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS WITH OFF-BALANCE SHEET RISK The Company is a party to certain derivative and other financial instruments that are not reflected on the balance sheet but represent obligations or assets of the Company in the normal course of business. These financial instruments are used for trading activities of the Company, to meet the needs of customers and to reduce the impact on the Company's operating results due to market fluctuations in currency or interest rates. These financial instruments involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit and market risk which are not recognized on the balance sheet. Credit risk is defined as the possibility that a loss may occur from the failure of another party to perform in accordance with the terms of the contract which exceeds the value of the existing collateral, if any. Market risk is the possibility that future changes in market conditions may make the financial instrument less valuable. DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS The fair value of the derivative financial instruments was calculated based on quoted market prices where available or if quoted market prices were not available, the Company used the estimated amount it would receive or pay to offset or terminate the agreements based upon the terms of such contracts relative to prevailing interest rates. TRADING ACTIVITIES IN DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS The following table reflects the Company's positions relating to trading activities in derivative instruments. Trading activities include both activities for the Company's own account and for customers. At December 31, 1996 and 1997, and September 30, 1998, the majority of the Company's derivative transactions for customers are hedged with essentially offsetting contracts with other counterparties. The average fair value of derivatives held or written for trading purposes during the periods is not significant. The notional amount of derivative instruments reflects the extent of the Company's involvement in these instruments. For interest rate swap, cap and floor agreements, notional amounts do not represent exposure to credit or market risk. Notional amounts are not exchanged, but serve as a point of reference for calculating payments. F-39 UNIONBANCAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED) DECEMBER 31, 1995, 1996, AND 1997, AND SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 (UNAUDITED) AND 1998 NOTE 14 -- DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS AND OTHER FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS WITH OFF-BALANCE SHEET RISK (CONTINUED) The following is a summary of derivative instruments held or written for trading purposes.
DECEMBER 31, --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1996 1997 --------------------------------------- --------------------------------------- NOTIONAL CREDIT ESTIMATED NOTIONAL CREDIT ESTIMATED (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) AMOUNTS RISK(1) FAIR VALUE AMOUNTS RISK(1) FAIR VALUE - ---------------------------------------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- HELD OR WRITTEN FOR TRADING PURPOSES AND CUSTOMER ACCOMMODATIONS Foreign exchange forward contracts: Commitments to purchase............... $ 403,602 $ 2,813 $ (11,735) $ 531,330 $ 366 $ (34,304) Commitments to sell................... 530,923 18,958 14,759 709,512 40,671 40,274 Foreign exchange OTC options: Options purchased..................... -- -- -- 46,533 -- (634) Options written....................... -- -- -- 46,533 637 637 Currency swap agreements: Commitments to pay.................... 64,817 4,821 3,193 55,725 -- (5,971) Commitments to receive................ 38,417 1,628 1,595 55,725 5,971 5,971 Interest rate contracts: Caps purchased........................ 994,605 1,858 1,837 1,189,791 796 796 Floors purchased...................... 147,250 1,149 1,149 119,000 612 612 Caps written.......................... 994,605 21 (1,838) 1,189,791 -- (796) Floors written........................ 147,250 -- (1,149) 119,000 -- (612) Swap contracts: Pay variable/receive variable....... 10,000 28 1 58,000 301 -- Pay fixed/receive variable.......... 788,165 1,064 (17,592) 976,180 364 (29,579) Pay variable/receive fixed.......... 788,165 19,623 18,674 976,180 30,240 29,926 SEPTEMBER 30, --------------------------------------- 1998 --------------------------------------- NOTIONAL CREDIT ESTIMATED (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) AMOUNTS RISK(1) FAIR VALUE - ---------------------------------------- ----------- ----------- ----------- HELD OR WRITTEN FOR TRADING PURPOSES AND CUSTOMER ACCOMMODATIONS Foreign exchange forward contracts: Commitments to purchase............... $ 427,961 $ 5,250 $ (7,046) Commitments to sell................... 562,922 14,594 8,120 Foreign exchange OTC options: Options purchased..................... 4,000 74 74 Options written....................... 4,000 -- (74) Currency swap agreements: Commitments to pay.................... 46,725 -- (6,915) Commitments to receive................ 46,725 7,031 7,031 Interest rate contracts: Caps purchased........................ 1,115,260 644 644 Floors purchased...................... 141,314 1,382 1,382 Caps written.......................... 1,115,260 -- (644) Floors written........................ 141,314 -- (1,382) Swap contracts: Pay variable/receive variable....... 58,000 381 -- Pay fixed/receive variable.......... 1,048,142 1,506 (51,803) Pay variable/receive fixed.......... 1,048,142 55,151 53,697
- ------------ (1) Credit risk amounts reflect the replacement cost for those contracts in a gain position in the event of nonperformance by counterparties. ASSET AND LIABILITY MANAGEMENT DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS Derivative positions are integral components of the Company's designated asset and liability management activities. Therefore, the Company does not believe it is meaningful to separately analyze the derivatives component of its risk management activities in isolation from related positions. The Company uses interest rate derivative instruments as part of its management of asset and liability positions. Derivatives are used to manage interest rate risk relating to specified groups of assets and liabilities, including LIBOR based commercial loans, deposit liabilities and certain subordinated capital notes. The Company uses foreign currency forward contracts as a means of managing foreign exchange rate risk associated with assets or liabilities denominated in foreign currencies. F-40 UNIONBANCAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED) DECEMBER 31, 1995, 1996, AND 1997, AND SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 (UNAUDITED) AND 1998 NOTE 14 -- DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS AND OTHER FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS WITH OFF-BALANCE SHEET RISK (CONTINUED) The following table reflects summary information on derivative contracts used to hedge or modify the Company's risk as of December 31, 1996 and 1997, and September 30, 1998. Amounts included in the fair value column do not include gains or losses from changes in the value of the underlying asset or liability being hedged. Notional amounts are not exchanged, but serve as a point of reference for calculating payments. For interest rate swap, cap and floor agreements, notional amounts do not represent exposure to credit or market risk.
DECEMBER 31, 1996 --------------------------------------------------- UNAMORTIZED NOTIONAL PREMIUM PAID CREDIT ESTIMATED (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) AMOUNTS (RECEIVED) RISK(1) FAIR VALUE - --------------------------------------------------------------- ------------ ------------- --------- ----------- HELD FOR ASSET AND LIABILITY MANAGEMENT PURPOSES Foreign exchange forward contracts: Commitments to purchase...................................... $ 129,264 $ -- $ 1,628 $ (2,286) Commitments to sell.......................................... 4,142 -- 52 22 Currency swap agreements: Commitments to pay........................................... -- -- -- -- Interest rate contracts: Caps purchased............................................... 15,740 -- -- -- Floors purchased............................................. 2,050,000 6,309 9,750 9,750 Caps written................................................. 250,000 (709) 509 509 Floors written............................................... 500,000 (1,016) 391 391 Swap contracts: Pay fixed/receive variable................................. 114,086 -- 241 (851) Pay variable/receive fixed................................. 847,000 -- 3,775 2,398
- --------- (1) Credit risk amounts reflect the replacement cost for those contracts in a gain position in the event of nonperformance by counterparties. F-41 UNIONBANCAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED) DECEMBER 31, 1995, 1996, AND 1997, AND SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 (UNAUDITED) AND 1998 NOTE 14 -- DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS AND OTHER FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS WITH OFF-BALANCE SHEET RISK (CONTINUED)
DECEMBER 31, 1997 --------------------------------------------------- UNAMORTIZED NOTIONAL PREMIUM PAID CREDIT ESTIMATED (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) AMOUNTS (RECEIVED) RISK(1) FAIR VALUE - --------------------------------------------------------------- ------------ ------------- --------- ----------- HELD FOR ASSET AND LIABILITY MANAGEMENT PURPOSES Foreign exchange forward contracts: Commitments to purchase...................................... $ 341,298 $ -- $ 862 $ (5,055) Commitments to sell.......................................... 51,754 -- 35 (822) Currency swap agreements: Commitments to pay........................................... 26,400 -- 2,590 2,590 Interest rate contracts: Caps purchased............................................... 15,420 -- -- -- Floors purchased............................................. 3,550,000 11,730 4,040 4,040 Caps written................................................. 250,000 (335) 273 273 Floors written............................................... 1,850,000 (534) -- (1,309) Swap contracts: Pay fixed/receive variable................................. -- -- -- -- Pay variable/receive fixed................................. 575,000 -- 2,302 2,302
- --------- (1) Credit risk amounts reflect the replacement cost for those contracts in a gain position in the event of nonperformance by counterparties.
SEPTEMBER 30, 1998 --------------------------------------------------- UNAMORTIZED NOTIONAL PREMIUM PAID CREDIT ESTIMATED (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) AMOUNTS (RECEIVED) RISK(1) FAIR VALUE - -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------ ------------- --------- ----------- HELD FOR ASSET AND LIABILITY MANAGEMENT PURPOSES Foreign exchange forward contracts: Commitments to purchase..................................... $ 183,142 $ -- $ 3,724 $ 1,570 Commitments to sell......................................... 61,371 -- 105 (91) Currency swap agreements: Commitments to pay.......................................... 26,400 -- 3,501 3,501 Interest rate contracts: Caps purchased.............................................. -- -- -- -- Floors purchased............................................ 2,800,000 7,125 34,586 34,586 Caps written................................................ 250,000 (55) -- -- Floors written.............................................. 1,600,000 (53) (7,764) Swap contracts: Pay fixed/receive variable................................ -- -- -- Pay variable/receive fixed................................ 525,000 -- 14,495
- --------- (1) Credit risk amounts reflect the replacement cost for those contracts in a gain position in the event of nonperformance by counterparties. F-42 UNIONBANCAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED) DECEMBER 31, 1995, 1996, AND 1997, AND SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 (UNAUDITED) AND 1998 NOTE 14 -- DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS AND OTHER FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS WITH OFF-BALANCE SHEET RISK (CONTINUED) OTHER FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS WITH OFF-BALANCE SHEET RISK Commitments to extend credit are legally binding agreements to lend to a customer provided there are no violations of any condition established in the contract. Commitments have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require payment of a fee or maintenance of compensatory balances. Such fees are deferred and, upon partial or full exercise of the commitment, amortized over the life of the loan or, if exercise is deemed remote, amortized over the commitment period. Since many of the commitments are expected to expire without being drawn upon, the contractual amounts do not necessarily represent future cash requirements. With respect to commitments to extend credit and letters of credit, the Company's exposure to credit risk in the event of nonperformance by customers is represented by the contractual amount of those instruments. Standby letters of credit are provided to customers to assure their performance to a third party, generally in the production of goods and services or under contractual commitments in the financial markets. Commercial letters of credit are issued to customers to facilitate foreign or domestic trade transactions. The Company charges fees for the issuance of standby and commercial letters of credit. The majority of these type of commitments have terms of one year or less and any fees charged are recognized as noninterest income upon extension of the commitment. The credit risk involved in issuing letters of credit is essentially the same as that involved in extending loan facilities to customers and is represented by the contractual amount of those instruments. When deemed necessary, the Company holds appropriate collateral supporting those commitments. Management does not anticipate any material losses as a result of these transactions. The Company uses the same credit underwriting policies in granting or accepting such commitments or contingent obligations as it does for on-balance sheet instruments, by evaluating customers' credit-worthiness. The amount of collateral obtained, if deemed necessary by the Company upon extension of credit, is based on management's evaluation of the customer. The nature of the collateral varies but may include deposits held in financial institutions, marketable securities, accounts receivable, inventory, property, equipment and real estate. The Company also provides for potential losses from either commitments to extend credit or standby letters of credit as a component of its evaluation in determination of the adequacy of its allowance for credit losses and resulting level of provision charged against current period earnings. The Company's pricing of these financial instruments is based on the credit quality and other covenants or requirements. Management believes that the current fees assessed on these off-balance sheet items represent market rates which would be charged for similar agreements. Based on this belief, the Company feels that the carrying amounts are reasonable estimates of the fair value of these financial instruments. At December 31, 1996 and 1997, and September 30, 1998, fair value represents management's F-43 UNIONBANCAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED) DECEMBER 31, 1995, 1996, AND 1997, AND SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 (UNAUDITED) AND 1998 NOTE 14 -- DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS AND OTHER FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS WITH OFF-BALANCE SHEET RISK (CONTINUED) estimate of the unamortized fee income associated with these instruments. The following is a summary of other financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk.
DECEMBER 31, -------------------------------------------------- SEPTEMBER 30, 1996 1997 1998 ------------------------ ------------------------ ------------------------ CONTRACTUAL FAIR CONTRACTUAL FAIR CONTRACTUAL FAIR (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) AMOUNTS VALUE AMOUNTS VALUE AMOUNTS VALUE - ------------------------------------ ------------- --------- ------------- --------- ------------- --------- Commitments to extend credit........ $ 12,500,677 $ 6,185 $ 15,111,062 $ 27,571 $ 15,036,195 $ 29,552 Standby letters of credit........... 2,610,123 2,808 2,289,878 5,776 2,562,523 6,749 Other letters of credit............. 336,101 -- 314,594 -- 282,866 --
The Company conducts securities lending transactions for institutional customers as a fully disclosed agent, and, at times, indemnifies its customers against counterparty default. All lending transactions are collateralized, primarily by cash. The amount of securities lent with indemnification was $1,170 million, $1,268 million and $1,162 million at December 31, 1996 and 1997, and September 30, 1998, respectively. The market value of the associated collateral was $1,195 million, $1,294 million and $1,185 million at December 31, 1996 and 1997, and September 30, 1998, respectively. NOTE 15 -- RESTRICTIONS ON CASH AND DUE FROM BANKS, SECURITIES, LOANS AND DIVIDENDS Federal Reserve Board regulations require the Bank to maintain reserve balances based on the types and amounts of deposits received. Average reserve balances were approximately $291 million, $339 million and $241 million for the years ended December 31, 1996 and 1997, and the nine months ended September 30, 1998, respectively. As of December 31, 1996 and 1997, and September 30, 1998, securities carried at $1.7 billion at each date, and loans of $1.8 billion, $2.7 billion and $2.7 billion, respectively, were pledged as collateral for borrowings, to secure public and trust department deposits, and for repurchase agreements as required by contract or law. The Federal Reserve Act restricts the extension of credit by the Bank to The Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi, Ltd. and affiliates and to UnionBanCal Corporation and its non-bank subsidiaries and requires that such loans be secured by certain types of collateral. At September 30, 1998, such extensions of credit were not material. The payment of dividends by the Bank to UnionBanCal Corporation is subject to the approval of the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) if the total of all dividends declared in any calendar year exceeds certain calculated amounts. The payment of dividends is also limited by minimum capital requirements imposed on national banks by the OCC. At September 30, 1998, the Bank could have declared dividends aggregating $321 million without prior regulatory approval. F-44 UNIONBANCAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED) DECEMBER 31, 1995, 1996, AND 1997, AND SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 (UNAUDITED) AND 1998 NOTE 16 -- REGULATORY CAPITAL REQUIREMENTS The Company and the Bank are subject to various regulatory capital requirements administered by the federal banking agencies, including minimum capital requirements. Failure to meet minimum capital requirements can initiate certain mandatory, and possibly additional discretionary, actions by regulators that, if undertaken, could have a direct material effect on the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements. Under capital adequacy guidelines and the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action, the Company and the Bank must meet specific capital guidelines that involve quantitative measures of the Company's and Bank's assets, liabilities, and certain off-balance sheet items as calculated under regulatory accounting practices. The Company's and the Bank's capital amounts and the Bank's prompt corrective action classification are also subject to qualitative judgments by the regulators about components, risk weightings and other factors. Quantitative measures established by regulation to ensure capital adequacy require the Company and the Bank to maintain minimum amounts and ratios (set forth in the table below) of total and Tier 1 capital (as defined in the regulations) to risk-weighted assets (as defined) and of Tier 1 capital (as defined) to average assets (as defined). Management believes, as of September 30, 1998, that the Company and the Bank meet all capital adequacy requirements to which they are subject. As of December 31, 1996, 1997, and and September 30, 1998 the most recent notification from the OCC categorized the Bank as "well capitalized" under the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action. To be categorized as "well capitalized", the Bank must maintain minimum total risk-based, Tier 1 risk-based and Tier 1 leverage ratios as set forth in the table. There are no conditions or events since that notification that management believes have changed the Bank's category. The Company's and the Bank's capital amounts and ratios are presented in the following tables.
FOR CAPITAL ACTUAL ADEQUACY PURPOSES -------------------------- ----------------------------------------------- (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) AMOUNT RATIO AMOUNT RATIO - ------------------------------ ------------- ---------- -------------------- ------------------------ CAPITAL RATIOS FOR THE COMPANY: As of December 31, 1996: Total capital (to risk-weighted assets)..... $ 2,946,654 11.17% > or = $ 2,111,223 > or = 8.0% Tier 1 capital (to risk-weighted assets)..... 2,395,580 9.08 > or = 1,055,612 > or = 4.0 Tier 1 capital (to quarterly average assets)(1)........ 2,395,580 8.41 > or = 1,139,855 > or = 4.0 As of December 31, 1997: Total capital (to risk-weighted assets)..... $ 3,188,173 11.05% > or = $ 2,308,988 > or = 8.0% Tier 1 capital (to risk-weighted assets)..... 2,587,071 8.96 > or = 1,154,494 > or = 4.0 Tier 1 capital (to quarterly average assets)(1)........ 2,587,071 8.53 > or = 1,213,381 > or = 4.0 As of September 30, 1998: Total capital (to risk-weighted assets)..... $ 3,474,632 11.51% > or = $ 2,414,158 > or = 8.0% Tier 1 capital (to risk-weighted assets)..... 2,876,605 9.53 > or = 1,207,079 > or = 4.0 Tier 1 capital (to quarterly average assets)(1)........ 2,876,605 9.37 > or = 1,227,857 > or = 4.0
- --------- (1) Excludes certain intangible assets F-45 UNIONBANCAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED) DECEMBER 31, 1995, 1996, AND 1997, AND SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 (UNAUDITED) AND 1998 NOTE 16 -- REGULATORY CAPITAL REQUIREMENTS (CONTINUED)
TO BE WELL CAPITALIZED FOR CAPITAL UNDER PROMPT CORRECTIVE ACTUAL ADEQUACY PURPOSES ACTION PROVISIONS (DOLLARS IN ---------------------------- --------------------------------------- ------------------------------------ THOUSANDS) AMOUNT RATIO AMOUNT RATIO AMOUNT RATIO - -------------------- ------------- ------ ----------------------- ------------- -------------------- ------------- CAPITAL RATIOS FOR THE BANK: As of December 31, 1996: Total capital (to risk-weighted assets)......... $ 2,746,285 10.51% > or = $ 2,090,910 > or = 8.0% > or = $ 2,613,638 > or = 10.0% Tier 1 capital (to risk-weighted assets)......... 2,208,392 8.45 > or = 1,045,455 > or = 4.0 > or = 1,568,183 > or = 6.0 Tier 1 capital (to quarterly average assets)(1)...... 2,208,392 7.76 > or = 1,138,211 > or = 4.0 > or = 1,422,764 > or = 5.0 As of December 31, 1997: Total capital (to risk-weighted assets)......... $ 3,025,030 10.58% > or = $ 2,286,296 > or = 8.0% > or = $ 2,857,870 > or = 10.0% Tier 1 capital (to risk-weighted assets)......... 2,527,468 8.84 > or = 1,143,148 > or = 4.0 > or = 1,714,722 > or = 6.0 Tier 1 capital (to quarterly average assets)(1)...... 2,527,468 8.35 > or = 1,210,898 > or = 4.0 > or = 1,513,622 > or = 5.0 As of September 30, 1998: Total capital (to risk-weighted assets)......... $ 3,304,538 11.06% > or = $ 2,389,402 > or = 8.0% > or = $ 2,986,753 > or = 10.0% Tier 1 capital (to risk-weighted assets)......... 2,810,368 9.41 > or = 1,194,701 > or = 4.0 > or = 1,792,052 > or = 6.0 Tier 1 capital (to quarterly average assets)(1)...... 2,810,368 9.14 > or = 1,230,394 > or = 4.0 > or = 1,537,992 > or = 5.0
- --------- (1) Excludes certain intangible assets. F-46 UNIONBANCAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED) DECEMBER 31, 1995, 1996, AND 1997, AND SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 (UNAUDITED) AND 1998 NOTE 17 -- EARNINGS PER SHARE (EPS) Basic EPS is computed by dividing net income after preferred dividends by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted EPS is computed based on the weighted average number of common shares outstanding adjusted for common stock equivalents, which include stock options. The following table presents a reconciliation of basic and diluted EPS for the years ended December 31, 1995, 1996 and 1997, and for the nine months ended September 30, 1997 and 1998, in accordance with SFAS No. 128:
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, ------------------ 1995 (AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS, ------------------ EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA) BASIC DILUTED - ------------------------------ -------- -------- Net Income.................... $312,942 $312,942 Less: Preferred stock dividends... (11,305) (11,305) -------- -------- Income available to common shareholders................ $301,637 $301,637 -------- -------- -------- -------- Weighted average common shares outstanding................. 173,806 173,806 Additional shares due to: Assumed conversion of dilutive stock options.... -- 293 -------- -------- Adjusted weighted average common shares outstanding... 173,806 174,099 -------- -------- -------- -------- Net income per share.......... $ 1.74 $ 1.73 -------- -------- -------- -------- NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, -------------------------------------- 1996 1997 1997 1998 (AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS, ------------------ ------------------ ------------------ ------------------ EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA) BASIC DILUTED BASIC DILUTED BASIC DILUTED BASIC DILUTED - ------------------------------ -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- Net Income.................... $249,458 $249,458 $411,296 $411,296 $318,851 $318,851 $352,365 $352,365 Less: Preferred stock dividends... (11,306) (11,306) (7,600) (7,600) (7,600) (7,600) -- -- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- Income available to common shareholders................ $238,152 $238,152 $403,696 $403,696 $311,251 $311,251 $352,365 $352,365 -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- Weighted average common shares outstanding................. 174,391 174,391 174,683 174,683 174,615 174,615 175,091 175,091 Additional shares due to: Assumed conversion of dilutive stock options.... -- 393 -- 506 -- 456 -- 638 -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- Adjusted weighted average common shares outstanding... 174,391 174,784 174,683 175,189 174,615 175,071 175,091 175,729 -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- Net income per share.......... $ 1.37 $ 1.36 $ 2.31 $ 2.30 $ 1.78 $ 1.78 $ 2.01 $ 2.01 -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- --------
Options to purchase 277,200 shares of common stock at $18 per share were outstanding but not included in the computation of diluted EPS in 1996 because the options were anti-dilutive. Options to purchase 422,400 shares of common stock at $22 per share and options to purchase 527,550 shares of common stock at $35 per share were outstanding but not included in the computation of diluted EPS for the nine months ended September 30, 1997 and 1998, respectively, because the options were anti-dilutive. F-47 UNIONBANCAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED) DECEMBER 31, 1995, 1996, AND 1997, AND SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 (UNAUDITED) AND 1998 NOTE 18 -- COMPREHENSIVE INCOME The following is a summary of the components of accumulated other comprehensive income:
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, ---------------------------------- (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) 1995 1996 1997 - ------------------------------------------------------------ ---------- ---------- ---------- FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, ----------------------- 1997 1998 ----------- ---------- (UNAUDITED) Net unrealized gain (loss) on securities available for sale, net of reclassification adjustment: Beginning balance......................................... $ (8,838) $ 24,900 $ 14,064 $ 14,064 $ 19,886 Net unrealized gain (loss) on securities available for sale during the period, before tax...................... 53,890 (13,409) 11,908 10,626 41,378 Income tax (expense) benefit.............................. (20,586) 5,297 (4,370) (4,229) (15,766) Less: reclassification adjustment for net realized (gain) loss on securities available for sale included in net income during the period, before tax.................... 702 (4,502) (2,711) (2,098) (5,579) Plus: income tax expense (benefit)........................ (268) 1,778 995 857 1,960 ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------- ---------- Net activity................................................ 33,738 (10,836) 5,822 5,156 21,993 ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------- ---------- Ending balance.............................................. 24,900 14,064 19,886 19,220 41,879 ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------- ---------- Foreign currency translation adjustments: Beginning balance......................................... (1,092) (1,240) (3,183) (3,183) (12,458) Foreign currency translation adjustments during the period, before tax...................................... (239) (3,212) (14,652) (2,785) (153) Income tax benefit........................................ 91 1,269 5,377 1,128 62 ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------- ---------- Net activity................................................ (148) (1,943) (9,275) (1,657) (91) ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------- ---------- Ending balance.............................................. (1,240) (3,183) (12,458) (4,840) (12,549) ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------- ---------- Other comprehensive income.................................. $ 33,590 $ (12,779) $ (3,453) $ 3,499 $ 21,902 ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------- ---------- Accumulated other comprehensive income...................... $ 23,660 $ 10,881 $ 7,428 $ 14,380 $ 29,330 ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------- ----------
NOTE 19 -- CONTINGENCIES The Company is subject to various pending and threatened legal actions which arise in the normal course of business. The Company maintains reserves for losses from legal actions which are both probable and estimable. In the opinion of management, the disposition of claims currently pending will not have a material adverse effect on the Company's financial position or results of operations. NOTE 20 -- TRANSACTIONS WITH AFFILIATES The Company has had, and expects to have in the future, banking transactions and other transactions in the ordinary course of business with The Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi, Ltd. and with its affiliates and F-48 UNIONBANCAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED) DECEMBER 31, 1995, 1996, AND 1997, AND SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 (UNAUDITED) AND 1998 NOTE 20 -- TRANSACTIONS WITH AFFILIATES (CONTINUED) associates. During the years ended December 31, 1995, 1996 and 1997, and nine months ended September 30, 1997 and 1998, such transactions included, but were not limited to, origination, participation, servicing and remarketing of loans and leases, purchase and sale of acceptances and interest rate derivatives, foreign exchange transactions, funds transfers, custodianships, electronic data processing, investment advice and management, deposits and credit examination, and trust services. In the opinion of management, such transactions were made at prevailing rates, terms and conditions and do not involve more than the normal risk of collectibility or present other unfavorable features. In addition, some compensation for services rendered to the Company is paid to the expatriate officers from The Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi, Ltd., and reimbursed by the Company to The Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi, Ltd. under a services agreement. NOTE 21 -- CONDENSED UNIONBANCAL CORPORATION UNCONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONDENSED BALANCE SHEETS
DECEMBER 31, -------------------------- SEPTEMBER 30, (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) 1996 1997 1998 - ----------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------ ------------ ------------- ASSETS Cash and due from banks.............................................. $ 103,742 $ 66,872 $ 129,513 Investment in and advances to subsidiaries........................... 2,503,706 2,879,898 3,171,235 Other assets......................................................... 9,161 7,971 4,619 ------------ ------------ ------------- Total assets................................................... $ 2,616,609 $ 2,954,741 $ 3,305,367 ------------ ------------ ------------- ------------ ------------ ------------- LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY Commercial paper..................................................... $ -- $ -- $ 94,026 Subordinated capital notes........................................... 100,000 250,000 200,000 Other liabilities.................................................... 21,676 25,442 26,391 ------------ ------------ ------------- Total liabilities.............................................. 121,676 275,442 320,417 Shareholders' equity................................................. 2,494,933 2,679,299 2,984,950 ------------ ------------ ------------- Total liabilities and shareholders' equity..................... $ 2,616,609 $ 2,954,741 $ 3,305,367 ------------ ------------ ------------- ------------ ------------ -------------
F-49 UNIONBANCAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED) DECEMBER 31, 1995, 1996, AND 1997, AND SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 (UNAUDITED) AND 1998 NOTE 21 -- CONDENSED UNIONBANCAL CORPORATION UNCONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED) CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, SEPTEMBER 30, ---------------------------------- ----------------------- (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) 1995 1996 1997 1998 - --------------------------------------------------- ---------- ---------- ---------- 1997 ---------- ----------- (UNAUDITED) INCOME: Dividends from bank subsidiary................... $ 25,062 $ 270,662 $ 85,660 $ 61,153 $ 73,592 Dividends from nonbank subsidiaries.............. 343 421 -- -- 23,000 Interest income on advances to subsidiaries and deposits in bank............................... 52,289 24,366 12,217 9,428 8,402 Other income..................................... -- 959 1,040 1,040 -- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------- ---------- Total income............................... 77,694 296,408 98,917 71,621 104,994 EXPENSE: Interest expense................................. 54,133 22,220 11,174 7,279 11,306 Other expense, net............................... (212) 1,072 1,583 1,220 1,765 ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------- ---------- Total expense.............................. 53,921 23,292 12,757 8,499 13,071 ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------- ---------- Income before income taxes and equity in undistributed net income of subsidiaries......... 23,773 273,116 86,160 63,122 91,923 Income tax expense (benefit)....................... (694) 889 204 804 (1,634) ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------- ---------- Income before equity in undistributed net income of subsidiaries..................................... 24,467 272,227 85,956 62,318 93,557 Equity in undistributed net income (loss) of subsidiaries: Bank subsidiary(1)............................... 285,053 (32,894) 314,739 250,050 273,844 Nonbank subsidiaries(2).......................... 3,422 10,125 10,601 6,483 (15,036) ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------- ---------- NET INCOME......................................... $ 312,942 $ 249,458 $ 411,296 $ 318,851 $ 352,365 ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------- ----------
- --------- (1) In 1996 the amount represents dividends distributed by the Bank in excess of its 1996 net income. (2) In the nine months ended September 30, 1998 the amount represents dividends distributed by nonbank subsidiaries in excess of their net income for the nine months ended September 30, 1998. F-50 UNIONBANCAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED) DECEMBER 31, 1995, 1996, AND 1997, AND SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 (UNAUDITED) AND 1998 NOTE 21 -- CONDENSED UNIONBANCAL CORPORATION UNCONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED) CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, SEPTEMBER 30, ------------------------------------ ------------------------ (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) 1995 1996 1997 1998 - ---------------------------------------------------------- ----------- ----------- ---------- 1997 ----------- ----------- (UNAUDITED) CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES: Net income.............................................. $ 312,942 $ 249,458 $ 411,296 $ 318,851 $ 352,365 Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: Equity in undistributed (earnings) losses of subsidiaries.......................................... (288,475) 22,769 (325,340) (256,533) (258,808) Other, net.............................................. 2,800 (3,772) 1,059 2,681 (1,427) ----------- ----------- ---------- ----------- ----------- Net cash provided by operating activities......... 27,267 268,455 87,015 64,999 92,130 CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES: Advances to subsidiaries................................ 33,590 (12,779) (130,805) (107,621) (22,968) Repayment of advances to subsidiaries................... 70,000 70,000 76,104 75,002 16,604 Sales and maturities of securities...................... 11,650 322 -- -- -- ----------- ----------- ---------- ----------- ----------- Net cash provided (used) by investing activities...................................... 115,240 57,543 (54,701) (32,619) (6,364) CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES: Net increase (decrease) in short term borrowings........ 366 (632,296) -- -- 94,026 Proceeds from reduction of investment in subsidiary equity................................................ -- 3,966 -- -- -- Maturity and redemption of subordinated capital notes and long term debt.................................... (70,000) (70,000) (50,000) (50,000) (50,000) Proceeds from issuance of subordinated capital notes.... -- -- 200,000 200,000 -- Payments of cash dividends.............................. (62,044) (182,652) (93,303) (68,787) (73,631) Redemption of preferred stock........................... -- -- (135,000) (135,000) -- Other, net.............................................. 3,392 17,813 9,119 5,718 6,480 ----------- ----------- ---------- ----------- ----------- Net cash used by financing activities............. (128,286) (863,169) (69,184) (48,069) (23,125) ----------- ----------- ---------- ----------- ----------- Net increase (decrease) in cash and due from banks...... 14,221 (537,171) (36,870) (15,689) 62,641 Cash and due from banks at beginning of year............ 626,692 640,913 103,742 103,742 66,872 ----------- ----------- ---------- ----------- ----------- Cash and due from banks at end of year............ $ 640,913 $ 103,742 $ 66,872 $ 88,053 $ 129,513 ----------- ----------- ---------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ---------- ----------- ----------- CASH PAID (RECEIVED) DURING THE YEAR FOR: Interest................................................ $ 52,847 $ 25,785 $ 9,814 $ 5,986 $ 11,947 Income taxes............................................ (2,030) (198) 1,148 652 (3,921) SUPPLEMENTAL SCHEDULE OF NONCASH INVESTING AND FINANCING ACTIVITIES: Dividends declared but unpaid........................... $ 12,788 $ 20,383 $ 24,528 $ 23,055 $ 24,529
F-51 UNIONBANCAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED) DECEMBER 31, 1995, 1996, AND 1997, AND SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 (UNAUDITED) AND 1998 NOTE 22 -- SUMMARY OF QUARTERLY FINANCIAL INFORMATION (UNAUDITED) Certain amounts in the following unaudited quarterly financial information have been reclassified to conform with current presentation. In the opinion of management, all adjustments necessary to fairly present the results of operations have been made.
1996 QUARTERS ENDED --------------------------------------------------- (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA) MARCH 31 JUNE 30 SEPTEMBER 30 DECEMBER 31 - --------------------------------------------------------------- ----------- --------- ------------- ------------ Interest income................................................ $ 483,068 $ 473,601 $ 481,315 $ 489,320 Interest expense............................................... 187,401 185,362 189,727 196,236 ----------- --------- ------------- ------------ Net interest income............................................ 295,667 288,239 291,588 293,084 Provision for credit losses.................................... 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 Noninterest income............................................. 102,874 105,550 107,280 102,972 Noninterest expense............................................ 252,024 313,784 284,075 285,021 ----------- --------- ------------- ------------ Income before income taxes..................................... 136,517 70,005 104,793 101,035 Income tax expense............................................. 53,251 25,597 42,810 41,234 ----------- --------- ------------- ------------ Net income..................................................... $ 83,266 $ 44,408 $ 61,983 $ 59,801 ----------- --------- ------------- ------------ ----------- --------- ------------- ------------ Net income applicable to common stock.......................... $ 80,440 $ 41,582 $ 59,156 $ 56,975 ----------- --------- ------------- ------------ ----------- --------- ------------- ------------ Net income per common share -- basic........................... $ 0.46 $ 0.24 $ 0.34 $ 0.33 ----------- --------- ------------- ------------ ----------- --------- ------------- ------------ Net income per common share -- diluted......................... $ 0.46 $ 0.24 $ 0.34 $ 0.33 ----------- --------- ------------- ------------ ----------- --------- ------------- ------------ Dividends per common share(1)(2)............................... $ 0.12 $ 0.12 $ 0.12 $ 0.12 ----------- --------- ------------- ------------ ----------- --------- ------------- ------------
1997 QUARTERS ENDED --------------------------------------------------- (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA) MARCH 31 JUNE 30 SEPTEMBER 30 DECEMBER 31 - --------------------------------------------------------------- ----------- --------- ------------- ------------ Interest income................................................ $ 485,031 $ 504,663 $ 520,237 $ 523,530 Interest expense............................................... 191,000 197,647 207,983 205,149 ----------- --------- ------------- ------------ Net interest income............................................ 294,031 307,016 312,254 318,381 Provision for credit losses.................................... -- -- -- -- Noninterest income............................................. 114,786 111,021 116,820 120,374 Noninterest expense............................................ 253,138 255,753 253,317 282,457 ----------- --------- ------------- ------------ Income before income taxes..................................... 155,679 162,284 175,757 156,298 Income tax expense............................................. 63,177 65,739 45,953 63,853 ----------- --------- ------------- ------------ Net income..................................................... $ 92,502 $ 96,545 $ 129,804 $ 92,445 ----------- --------- ------------- ------------ ----------- --------- ------------- ------------ Net income applicable to common stock.......................... $ 89,676 $ 93,718 $ 127,857 $ 92,445 ----------- --------- ------------- ------------ ----------- --------- ------------- ------------ Net income per common share -- basic........................... $ 0.51 $ 0.54 $ 0.73 $ 0.53 ----------- --------- ------------- ------------ ----------- --------- ------------- ------------ Net income per common share -- diluted......................... $ 0.51 $ 0.54 $ 0.73 $ 0.53 ----------- --------- ------------- ------------ ----------- --------- ------------- ------------ Dividends per common share(1).................................. $ 0.12 $ 0.12 $ 0.14 $ 0.14 ----------- --------- ------------- ------------ ----------- --------- ------------- ------------
F-52 UNIONBANCAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED) DECEMBER 31, 1995, 1996, AND 1997, AND SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 (UNAUDITED) AND 1998 NOTE 22 -- SUMMARY OF QUARTERLY FINANCIAL INFORMATION (UNAUDITED) (CONTINUED)
1998 QUARTERS ENDED ------------------------------------- (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA) MARCH 31 JUNE 30 SEPTEMBER 30 - ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ----------- --------- ------------- Interest income............................................................... $ 508,653 $ 511,996 $ 535,973 Interest expense.............................................................. 191,203 186,440 199,340 ----------- --------- ------------- Net interest income........................................................... 317,450 325,556 336,633 Provision for credit losses................................................... 20,000 15,000 10,000 Noninterest income............................................................ 128,030 147,994 123,925 Noninterest expense........................................................... 268,475 277,325 290,378 ----------- --------- ------------- Income before income taxes.................................................... 157,005 181,225 160,180 Income tax expense............................................................ 61,428 72,704 11,913 ----------- --------- ------------- Net income.................................................................... $ 95,577 $ 108,521 $ 148,267 ----------- --------- ------------- ----------- --------- ------------- Net income applicable to common stock......................................... $ 95,577 $ 108,521 $ 148,267 ----------- --------- ------------- ----------- --------- ------------- Net income per common share -- basic.......................................... $ 0.55 $ 0.62 $ 0.85 ----------- --------- ------------- ----------- --------- ------------- Net income per common share -- diluted........................................ $ 0.54 $ 0.62 $ 0.84 ----------- --------- ------------- ----------- --------- ------------- Dividends per common share(1)................................................. $ 0.14 $ 0.14 $ 0.14 ----------- --------- ------------- ----------- --------- -------------
- ------------ (1) Dividends per share for 1996, 1997, and 1998 are based on the Company's common stock outstanding as of the declaration date. (2) Amounts prior to merger are based on Union Bank only and do not include the dividend of $145 million paid to The Mitsubishi Bank, Limited in the first quarter of 1996 by BanCal Tri-State Corporation and The Bank of California, N.A. NOTE 23 -- SUBSEQUENT EVENT Under a shelf registration filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) on November 19, 1998, the Company may have available for issuance $750 million of senior or subordinated debt securities, common stock or preferred stock. The timing and sale of any debt or equity securities under this filing will depend on market conditions. It is anticipated that the Company will issue up to $500 million, in the first quarter of 1999, of trust preferred securities which will be utilized to repurchase the Company's common stock held by The Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi, Ltd. and others. The trust preferred securities are considered Tier 1 capital for regulatory reporting purposes. The Company will record the securities as debt instruments. Under a common stock offering filed with the SEC on November 19, 1998, The Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi, Ltd. may sell up to $750 million of the Company's common stock in the secondary market. The sale of these securities will reduce the percentage ownership that The Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi, Ltd. currently holds in the Company. The Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi, Ltd. will continue to hold a majority ownership position of the Company. The sale is expected to occur during the first quarter of 1999. F-53 INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT To the Shareholders and Directors of UnionBanCal Corporation: We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of UnionBanCal Corporation and subsidiaries (the "Company") as of December 31, 1996 and 1997 and September 30, 1998 and the related consolidated statements of income, changes in shareholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 1997 and for the nine-month period ended September 30, 1998. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. The consolidated financial statements give retroactive effect to the merger of BanCal Tri-State and Union Bank on April 1, 1996, which has been accounted for as a pooling of interests as described in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements. We did not audit the consolidated statements of income, changes in shareholders' equity, and cash flows of Union Bank and subsidiaries for the year ended December 31, 1995, which statements reflect total net interest income and net income of $832 million and $207 million, respectively. Those statements were audited by other auditors whose report has been furnished to us, and our opinion expressed herein, insofar as it relates to the amounts included for Union Bank for 1995, is based solely upon the report of such other auditors. We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits and the report of the other auditors provide a reasonable basis for our opinion. In our opinion, based on our audits and the report of the other auditors, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of UnionBanCal Corporation and subsidiaries as of December 31, 1996 and 1997 and September 30, 1998 and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 1997 and for the nine-month period ended September 30, 1998 in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles. [SIGNATURE] San Francisco, California February 2, 1999 F-54 REPORT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS To the Shareholders and Board of Directors of Union Bank: We have audited the consolidated statement of income of Union Bank, a California state chartered bank and a 71% owned subsidiary of The Bank of Tokyo, Ltd., and subsidiaries (the "Bank") and the related consolidated statements of shareholders' equity and cash flows for the year ended December 31, 1995 (not presented herein). These financial statements are the responsibility of the Bank's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit. We conducted our audit in accordance with generally accepted standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the results of operations and cash flows for the year ended December 31, 1995, of Union Bank and subsidiaries, in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles. [SIGNATURE] San Francisco, California January 24, 1996 F-55 [LOGO] THE INFORMATION IN THIS PROSPECTUS IS NOT COMPLETE AND MAY BE CHANGED. THE SELLING SHAREHOLDER MAY NOT SELL THESE SECURITIES UNTIL THE REGISTRATION STATEMENT FILED WITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION IS EFFECTIVE. THIS PROSPECTUS IS NOT AN OFFER TO SELL THESE SECURITIES AND THE SELLING SHAREHOLDER IS NOT SOLICITING AN OFFER TO BUY THESE SECURITIES IN ANY STATE WHERE SUCH OFFER OR SALE IS NOT PERMITTED. PROSPECTUS (SUBJECT TO COMPLETION) ISSUED FEBRUARY 8, 1999 22,000,000 SHARES [LOGO] COMMON STOCK ----------------- THE BANK OF TOKYO-MITSUBISHI, LTD. IS OFFERING 22,000,000 SHARES OF COMMON STOCK OF UNIONBANCAL CORPORATION. THE BANK OF TOKYO-MITSUBISHI, LTD. CURRENTLY OWNS 81.5% OF OUR COMMON STOCK AND WILL OWN 68.3% AFTER THE OFFERING. ------------------- OUR COMMON STOCK IS LISTED ON THE NASDAQ NATIONAL MARKET UNDER THE SYMBOL "UNBC". ON FEBRUARY 8, 1999, THE LAST REPORTED SALE PRICE OF OUR COMMON STOCK WAS $34 PER SHARE. ------------------- INVESTING IN THE COMMON STOCK INVOLVES RISKS. SEE "RISK FACTORS" BEGINNING ON PAGE 10. ----------------- PRICE $ A SHARE -------------------
UNDERWRITING PROCEEDS TO PRICE TO DISCOUNTS AND SELLING PUBLIC COMMISSIONS SHAREHOLDER ------------------ ------------------ ------------------ PER SHARE.......................................... $ $ $ TOTAL.............................................. $ $ $
- --------- THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION AND STATE SECURITIES REGULATORS HAVE NOT APPROVED OR DISAPPROVED THESE SECURITIES, OR DETERMINED IF THIS PROSPECTUS IS TRUTHFUL OR COMPLETE. ANY REPRESENTATION TO THE CONTRARY IS A CRIMINAL OFFENSE. THE BANK OF TOKYO-MITSUBISHI, LTD. HAS GRANTED THE UNDERWRITERS THE RIGHT TO PURCHASE UP TO AN ADDITIONAL 3,300,000 SHARES TO COVER OVER-ALLOTMENTS. MORGAN STANLEY & CO. INCORPORATED EXPECTS TO DELIVER THE SHARES TO PURCHASERS ON , 1999. ------------------- MORGAN STANLEY DEAN WITTER LEHMAN BROTHERS J.P. MORGAN SECURITIES LTD. SALOMON SMITH BARNEY INTERNATIONAL TOKYO-MITSUBISHI INTERNATIONAL , 1999 PART II INFORMATION NOT REQUIRED IN PROSPECTUS ITEM 14. OTHER EXPENSES OF ISSUANCE AND DISTRIBUTION. The following expenses (other than the SEC registration fee and NASD filing fee) are estimated.
SEC registration fee........................................................................ $ 243,971 NASD filing fee............................................................................. 30,500 Printing and engraving expenses............................................................. 125,000 Accountants' fees and expenses.............................................................. 750,000 Attorneys' fees and expenses................................................................ 450,000 Miscellaneous............................................................................... 220,529 ------------ Total................................................................................... $ 1,820,000 ------------ ------------
UnionBanCal Corporation and The Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi will each pay 50% of the registration expenses incurred in connection with the registration of the shares of UnionBanCal Corporation's common stock. The underwriters have agreed to reimburse The Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi for certain expenses incurred in connection with this offering. ITEM 15. INDEMNIFICATION OF DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS As authorized by Section 317 of the CGCL, each director and officer of UnionBanCal Corporation may be indemnified by UnionBanCal Corporation against expenses (including attorney's fees, judgments, fines and amounts paid in settlement) actually and reasonably incurred in connection with the defense or settlement of any threatened, pending or completed legal proceedings in which such person is involved by reason of the fact that such person is or was a director or officer of UnionBanCal Corporation if such person acted in good faith and in a manner that such person reasonably believed to be in the best interests of UnionBanCal Corporation and, with respect to any criminal action or proceeding, if such person had no reasonable cause to believe that his conduct was unlawful. If the legal proceeding, however, is by or in the right of UnionBanCal Corporation, the director or officer may not be indemnified in respect of any claim, issue or matter as to which such person shall have been adjudged to be liable for negligence or misconduct in the performance of his duty to UnionBanCal Corporation unless a court determines otherwise. In addition, we maintain a directors' and officers' liability policy. Article VII of the Articles of Incorporation and Section 55 of the Bylaws provide that, to the fullest extent permitted by law, directors of UnionBanCal Corporation will not be liable for monetary damages to UnionBanCal Corporation or its shareholders for breaches of their fiduciary duties. II-1 ITEM 16. EXHIBITS The following is a list of all exhibits filed as a part of this Registration Statement on Form S-3, including those incorporated herein by reference.
EXHIBIT NUMBER DESCRIPTION OF EXHIBITS - ----------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1.1* Form of Underwriting Agreement 4.1** Specimen Certificate representing shares of Common Stock 5.1* Opinion of John H. McGuckin, Jr., General Counsel, as to the legality of the Common Stock 23.1 Consent of Deloitte & Touche LLP, Independent Auditors 23.2 Consent of Arthur Andersen LLP, Independent Accountants 23.3* Consent of John H. McGuckin, Jr. (included in Exhibit 5.1) 24.1** Power of Attorney of certain officers and directors of the Company
- --------- * To be filed by amendment. ** Previously filed. ITEM 17. UNDERTAKINGS The undersigned registrant hereby undertakes that, for purposes of determining any liability under the Securities Act of 1933, each filing of the registrant's annual report pursuant to Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 that is incorporated by reference in the registration statement shall be deemed to be a new registration statement relating to the securities offered herein, and the offering of such securities at that time shall be deemed to be the initial BONA FIDE offering thereof. Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities Act of 1933 may be permitted to directors, officers and controlling persons of the registrant pursuant to the provisions set forth in Item 15, or otherwise, the registrant has been advised that in the opinion of the Securities and Exchange Commission such indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the Act and is, therefore, unenforceable. In the event that a claim for indemnification against such liabilities (other than the payment by the registrant of expenses incurred or paid by a director, officer or controlling registrant of expenses incurred or paid by a director, officer or controlling person of the registrant in the successful defense of any action, suit or proceeding) is asserted by such director, officer or controlling person in connection with the securities being registered, the registrant will, unless in the opinion of its counsel the matter has been settled by controlling precedent, submit to a court of appropriate jurisdiction the question whether such indemnification by it is against public policy as expressed in the Act and will be governed by the final adjudication of such issue. The undersigned registrant hereby undertakes that: (1) For purposes of determining any liability under the Securities Act of 1933, the information omitted from the form of prospectus filed as part of this registration statement in reliance upon Rule 430A and contained in a form of prospectus filed by the registrant pursuant to Rule 424(b) (1) or (4) or 497(h) under the Securities Act shall be deemed to be part of this registration statement as of the time it was declared effective. (2) For the purpose of determining any liability under the Securities Act of 1933, each post-effective amendment that contains a form of prospectus shall be deemed to be a new registration statement relating to the securities offered therein, and the offering of such securities at that time shall be deemed to be the initial bona fide offering thereof. II-2 SIGNATURES Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, the registrant certifies that it has reasonable grounds to believe that it meets all of the requirements for filing on this Form S-3 and has duly caused this Amendment No. 4 to Registration Statement to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, in the City of San Francisco, State of California, on this 9th day of February, 1999. UNIONBANCAL CORPORATION By: /s/ DAVID A. ANDERSON ----------------------------------------- David A. Anderson SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT AND CONTROLLER
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act, this Amendment No. 4 to Registration Statement has been signed below by the following persons in the capacities indicated on February 9, 1999.
SIGNATURES TITLE - ------------------------------ -------------------------- President and Chief * Executive Officer and - ------------------------------ Director (Principal Takahiro Moriguchi Executive Officer) * - ------------------------------ Deputy Chairman of the Yoshihiko Someya Board Executive Vice President * and Chief Financial - ------------------------------ Officer (Principal David I. Matson Financial Officer) /s/ DAVID A. ANDERSON Senior Vice President and - ------------------------------ Controller (Principal David A. Anderson Accounting Officer) * - ------------------------------ Chairman of the Board Kaoru Hayama * - ------------------------------ Vice Chairman of the Board Richard C. Hartnack * - ------------------------------ Vice Chairman of the Board Robert M. Walker
II-3
SIGNATURES TITLE - ------------------------------ -------------------------- * - ------------------------------ Director Richard D. Farman * - ------------------------------ Director Stanley F. Farrar * - ------------------------------ Director Herman E. Gallegos * - ------------------------------ Director Jack L. Hancock * - ------------------------------ Director Harry W. Low * - ------------------------------ Director Mary S. Metz * - ------------------------------ Director Raymond E. Miles * - ------------------------------ Director J. Fernando Niebla * - ------------------------------ Director Sidney R. Petersen * - ------------------------------ Director Carl W. Robertson * - ------------------------------ Director Henry T. Swigert
II-4
SIGNATURES TITLE - ------------------------------ -------------------------- * - ------------------------------ Director Tsuneo Wakai * - ------------------------------ Director Hiroshi Watanabe - ------------------------------ Director Blenda J. Wilson - ------------------------------ Director Kenji Yoshizawa
*By: /s/ JOHN H. MCGUCKIN, JR. ------------------------- John H. McGuckin, Jr. ATTORNEY-IN-FACT
II-5 EX-23.1 2 EXHIBIT 23.1 EXHIBIT 23.1 INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT We consent to the inclusion and incorporation by reference in this Amendment No. 4 to Registration Statement No. 333-67579 of UnionBanCal Corporation of our report dated February 2, 1999 appearing herein and in Form 8-K of UnionBanCal Corporation dated February 5, 1999, and to the reference to us under the heading "Experts" in the Prospectus, which is a part of this Registration Statement. /s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP San Francisco, California February 8, 1999 EX-23.2 3 EXHIBIT 23.2 EXHIBIT 23.2 CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the use of our report dated January 24, 1996 on the consolidated financial statements of Union Bank and subsidiaries for the year ended December 31, 1995 (not presented herein), included in Amendment No. 4 to Form S-3 Registration Statement File No. 333-67579 and to the incorporation by reference of said report, included in Form 8-K of UnionBanCal Corporation dated February 5, 1999, in said Form S-3 Registration Statement. It should be noted that we have not audited any financial statements of Union Bank and subsidiaries subsequent to December 31, 1995 or performed any audit procedures subsequent to the date of our report. /s/ ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP San Francisco, California February 8, 1999 -----END PRIVACY-ENHANCED MESSAGE-----