XML 27 R12.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.3.1.900
Goodwill and Intangible Assets
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2015
Goodwill and Intangible Assets Disclosure [Abstract]  
Goodwill and Intangible Assets

Note 5. Goodwill and Intangible Assets

Intangible Assets

The following table presents the Company’s purchased intangible assets as of December 31, 2015 (in thousands):

 

     Gross Intangibles      Accumulated
Amortization
    Net Intangibles      Weighted Average
Amortization
Period (Years)
 

Customer relationships

   $ 102,594       $ (58,294   $ 44,300         8   

Trade names and trademarks

     11,698         (5,470     6,228         8   

Non-compete agreements

     1,190         (1,190     —           2   

Proprietary software

     850         (850     —           2   

Favorable lease agreement

     449         (449     —           2   

Content library

     491         (123     368         2   
  

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    
   $ 117,272       $ (66,376   $ 50,896         8   
  

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

The following table presents the Company’s purchased intangible assets as of December 31, 2014 (in thousands):

 

     Gross Intangibles      Accumulated
Amortization
    Net Intangibles      Weighted Average
Amortization
Period (Years)
 

Customer relationships

   $ 100,719       $ (47,571   $ 53,148         8   

Trade names and trademarks

     11,600         (4,128     7,472         8   

Non-compete agreements

     1,209         (1,209     —           2   

Proprietary software

     850         (850     —           2   

Favorable lease agreement

     449         (449     —           2   
  

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    
   $ 114,827       $ (54,207   $ 60,620         8   
  

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

The Company’s estimated future amortization expense for the succeeding years relating to the purchased intangible assets resulting from acquisitions completed prior to December 31, 2015, is as follows (in thousands):

 

Years Ending December 31,

   Amount  

2016

   $ 14,489   

2017

     14,366   

2018

     8,198   

2019

     7,605   

2020

     5,104   

2021 and thereafter

     1,134   

Goodwill

Changes in goodwill for the year ended December 31, 2015 consist of the following (in thousands):

 

     January 1, 2015      Acquisition  (1)      Effect of Foreign
Currency
    December 31,
2015
 

Americas

   $ 193,831       $ —         $ (7,782   $ 186,049   

EMEA

     —           10,054         (370     9,684   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 
   $ 193,831       $ 10,054       $ (8,152   $ 195,733   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

(1)

See Note 2, Acquisitions, for further information.

 

Changes in goodwill for the year ended December 31, 2014 consist of the following (in thousands):

 

     January 1, 2014      Acquisition      Effect of Foreign
Currency
    December 31,
2014
 

Americas

   $ 199,802       $ —         $ (5,971   $ 193,831   

EMEA

     —           —           —          —     
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 
   $ 199,802       $ —         $ (5,971   $ 193,831   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

The Company has five reporting units with goodwill and performs its annual goodwill impairment test during the third quarter, or more frequently, if indicators of impairment exist.

For the annual goodwill impairment test, the Company elected to forgo the option to first assess qualitative factors and performed its annual two-step goodwill impairment test as of July 31, 2015. Under ASC 350, the carrying value of assets is calculated at the reporting unit level. The quantitative assessment of goodwill includes comparing a reporting unit’s calculated fair value to its carrying value. The calculation of fair value requires significant judgments including estimation of future cash flows, which is dependent on internal forecasts, estimation of the long-term rate of growth, the useful life over which cash flows will occur and determination of the Company’s weighted average cost of capital. Changes in these estimates and assumptions could materially affect the determination of fair value and/or conclusions on goodwill impairment for each reporting unit. If the fair value of the reporting unit is less than its carrying value, goodwill is considered impaired and an impairment loss is recorded to the extent that the fair value of the goodwill within the reporting unit is less than its carrying value.

The process of evaluating the fair value of the reporting units is highly subjective and requires significant judgment and estimates as the reporting units operate in a number of markets and geographical regions. The Company used an average of the income and market approaches to determine its best estimates of fair value which incorporated the following significant assumptions:

 

   

Revenue projections, including revenue growth during the forecast periods;

 

   

EBITDA margin projections over the forecast periods;

 

   

Estimated income tax rates;

 

   

Estimated capital expenditures; and

 

   

Discount rates based on various inputs, including the risks associated with the specific reporting units as well as their revenue growth and EBITDA margin assumptions.

As of July 31, 2015, the Company concluded that goodwill was not impaired for all five of the reporting units. While the fair values of four of the reporting units were substantially in excess of their carrying value, the Qelp reporting unit’s fair value approximated its carrying value due to the proximity to the acquisition date of July 2, 2015. The newly acquired Qelp reporting unit’s carrying value was $15.6 million at July 31, 2015, including $9.9 million of goodwill.

The Qelp reporting unit is at considerable risk for future impairment if projected operating results are not met or other inputs into the fair value measurement change. However, as of December 31, 2015, there is no impairment as the fair value of the reporting unit exceeds its carrying value by a small margin. The Company will continue to review the calculated fair value of this reporting unit until the fair value is substantially in excess of its carrying value.