UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM
(Mark One)
| ANNUAL REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the Fiscal Year Ended |
| TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from ____________ to ____________
Commission File Number
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
| |
(State or other jurisdiction of | (I.R.S. Employer |
incorporation or organization) | Identification No.) |
| |
| |
(Address of principal executive offices) | (Zip Code) |
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code:
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Exchange Act:
Title of each class | Trading Symbol(s) | Name of each exchange on which registered |
| | |
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act:
None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ☐
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15 of the Act. Yes ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files).
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. ☒
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
☐Large Accelerated Filer | ☐ Accelerated Filer | ☒ | | |
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management’s assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report. ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ☐
The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity (the only such common equity being Common Stock, $.001 par value per share) held by non-affiliates of the registrant (computed by reference to the closing sale price of the Common Stock on June 30, 2020 of $8.20 is $
The number of shares outstanding of the registrant’s Common Stock, $.001 par value (being the only class of its common stock), is
Documents Incorporated by Reference
None.
JAKKS PACIFIC, INC.
TABLE OF CONTENTS TO ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K
For the Fiscal Year ended December 31, 2019
Items in Form 10-K
Page |
||
PART I |
||
Item 1. |
6 |
|
Item 1A. |
14 |
|
Item 1B. |
Unresolved Staff Comments |
None |
Item 2. |
26 |
|
Item 3. |
26 |
|
Item 4. |
26 |
|
PART II |
||
Item 5. |
27 |
|
Item 6. |
28 |
|
Item 7. |
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
30 |
Item 7A. |
43 |
|
Item 8. |
44 |
|
Item 9. |
Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure |
None |
Item 9A. |
87 |
|
Item 9B. |
Other Information |
None |
PART III |
||
Item 10. |
88 |
|
Item 11. |
95 |
|
Item 12. |
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters |
113 |
Item 13. |
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence |
115 |
Item 14. |
116 |
|
PART IV |
||
Item 15. |
117 |
|
Item 16. |
120 |
|
Signatures |
121 |
|
Certifications |
EXPLANATORY NOTE
As of the date of filing of this Annual Report on Form 10-K (this “Report”), there are many uncertainties regarding the current Novel Coronavirus (“COVID-19”) pandemic, including the scope of scientific and health issues, the anticipated duration of the pandemic, and the extent of local and worldwide social, political, and economic disruption it may cause. To date, the COVID-19 pandemic has had far-reaching impacts on many aspects of the operations of JAKKS Pacific, Inc. (the “Company”, “we,” “our” or “us”), directly and indirectly, including on consumer behavior, customer store traffic, production capabilities, timing of product availability, our people, and the market generally. The scope and nature of these impacts continue to evolve each day. The COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in, and may continue to result in, regional quarantines, labor stoppages and shortages, changes in consumer purchasing patterns, mandatory or elective shut-downs of retail locations, disruptions to supply chains, including the inability of our suppliers and service providers to deliver materials and services on a timely basis, or at all, severe market volatility, liquidity disruptions, and overall economic instability, which, in many cases, have had, and we expect will continue to have, adverse impacts on our business, financial condition and results of operations. This situation is changing rapidly, and additional impacts may arise that we are not aware of currently.
In light of the uncertain and rapidly evolving situation relating to the COVID-19 pandemic, we have taken certain precautionary measures intended to help minimize the risk to our Company, employees, and customers, including the following:
● |
On March 23, 2020, we encouraged all members of our headquarter’s staff in Santa Monica, CA to begin working from home. We expect that to be our operating model for an undetermined period of time, and until permitted by federal, state and local instructions to reopen; |
● |
We identified expense reductions that we implemented throughout the remainder of fiscal 2020, and into 2021; |
● |
Although our distribution center currently continues to operate, we continue to evaluate their operations, and may elect, or be required, to shut down their operations temporarily at any time in the future; |
● |
We have suspended all non-essential travel for our employees; and |
● |
We are discouraging employee attendance at industry events and in-person work-related meetings. |
Each of the remedial measures taken by the Company has had, and we expect will continue to have, adverse impacts on our current business, financial condition and results of operations, and may create additional risks for our Company. While we anticipate that the foregoing measures are temporary, we cannot predict the specific duration for which these precautionary measures will stay in effect, and we may elect or need to take additional measures as the information available to us continues to develop, including with respect to our employees, inventory receipts, and relationships with our licensors. We expect to continue to assess the evolving impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on our customers, consumers, employees, supply chain, and operations, and intend to make adjustments to our responses accordingly. However, the extent to which the COVID-19 pandemic and our precautionary measures in response thereto may impact our business, financial condition, and results of operations will depend on how the COVID-19 pandemic and its impacts to continue to develop, which are highly uncertain and cannot be predicted at this time.
In light of these uncertainties, for purposes of this report, except where otherwise indicated, the descriptions of our business, our strategies, our risk factors, and any other forward-looking statements, including regarding us, our business and the market generally, do not reflect the potential impact of the COVID-19 pandemic or our responses thereto. In addition, the disclosures contained in this report are made only as of the date hereof, and we undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statement as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as otherwise required by law. For further information, see “Disclosure Regarding Forward-Looking Statements.” and “Risk Factors.”
DISCLOSURE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This report includes “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. For example, statements included in this report regarding our financial position, business strategy and other plans and objectives for future operations, and assumptions and predictions about future product demand, supply, manufacturing, costs, marketing and pricing factors are all forward-looking statements. When we use words like “intend,” “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “plan” or “expect,” we are making forward-looking statements. We believe that the assumptions and expectations reflected in such forward-looking statements are reasonable, based upon information available to us on the date hereof, but we cannot assure you that these assumptions and expectations will prove to have been correct or that we will take any action that we may presently be planning. We have disclosed certain important factors that could cause our actual results to differ materially from our current expectations elsewhere in this report. You should understand that forward-looking statements made in this report are necessarily qualified by these factors. We are not undertaking to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statement if we obtain new information or upon the occurrence of future events or otherwise.
PART I
Item 1. Business
In this report, “JAKKS,” the “Company,” “we,” “us” and “our” refer to JAKKS Pacific, Inc., its subsidiaries and our majority-owned joint venture.
Company Overview
We are a leading multi-line, multi-brand toy company that designs, produces, markets and distributes toys and related products, consumables and related products, electronics and related products, kids indoor and outdoor furniture, and other consumer products. We focus our business on acquiring or licensing well-recognized intellectual property (“IP”), trademarks and/or brand names, most with long product histories (“evergreen brands”). We seek to acquire these evergreen brands because we believe they are less subject to market fads or trends. We also develop proprietary products marketed under our own trademarks and brand names, and have historically acquired complementary businesses to further grow our portfolio. For accounting purposes, our products have been divided into two segments: (i) Toys/Consumer Products and (ii) Halloween. Segment information with respect to revenues, assets and profits or losses attributable to each segment is contained in Note 3 to the audited consolidated financial statements contained below in Item 8. Our products include:
● |
Action figures and accessories, including licensed characters based on the Nintendo®, Sonic the Hedgehog® and Apex Legends® franchises and our own proprietary brands including Creepy Crawlers™; |
|
● |
Toy vehicles, including Xtreme Power Dozer®, Xtreme Power Dump Truck™, XPV®, Road Champs®, Fly Wheels® and MXS® toy vehicles and accessories; |
|
● |
Dolls and accessories, including small dolls, large dolls, fashion dolls and baby dolls based on licenses, including Disney Frozen 2®, Disney Princess®, Disney Raya and the Last Dragon™ and Minnie Mouse®, and infant and pre-school toys based on TV shows like Gigantosaurus® and PBS’s Daniel Tiger’s Neighborhood®; |
|
● |
Private label products developed exclusively for certain retail customers in various product categories; |
|
● |
Foot-to-floor ride-on products, including those based on Fisher-Price®, Nickelodeon®, and Hasbro®/Entertainment One® licenses and inflatable environments, tents and wagons; |
|
● |
Role play, dress-up, pretend play and novelty products for boys and girls based on well-known brands and entertainment properties such as Disney Frozen, Black & Decker®, Disney Princess, and Raya and the Last Dragon, as well as those based on our own proprietary brands; |
|
● |
Indoor and outdoor kids’ furniture, activity trays and tables and room décor; kiddie pools, seasonal and outdoor products, including those based on Disney characters, Nickelodeon, and Hasbro/Entertainment One licenses; |
|
● |
Halloween and everyday costumes for all ages based on licensed and proprietary non-licensed brands, including Super Mario Bros.®, Microsoft’s Halo®, LEGO® Movie, Disney-Pixar Toy Story®, Harry Potter®, Jurassic World®, Sesame Street®, Power Rangers®¸ Hasbro brands and Disney Frozen, Disney Princess and related Halloween accessories; and |
|
● |
Outdoor activity toys including Redo Skateboard Co.® and Junior sports toys including Skyball® hyper-charged balls, sport sets and Wave Hoops® toy hoops marketed under our Maui® brand. |
We continually review the marketplace to identify and evaluate popular and evergreen brands and product categories that we believe have the potential for growth. We endeavor to generate growth within these lines by:
● |
creating innovative products under our established licenses and brand names; |
● |
adding new items to the branded product lines that we expect will enjoy greater popularity; |
● |
infusing innovation and technology when appropriate to make products more appealing to today’s kids; and |
● |
expanding our international product offering either sold directly to retailers or via third party distributors. |
Our Business Strategy
In addition to developing our own proprietary brands, properties and marks, licensing popular IP enables us to use these high-profile marks at a lower cost than we would incur if we purchased these marks or funded the development of comparable marks on our own. Beyond the investment profile, we have an appreciation of the challenges and expertise required to break through the noise in a world filled with high-budget, content-centric consumer choices either based on well-known pre-existing IP or the even higher hurdle to launch new IP in the aforementioned marketplace. By licensing IP and trademarks from world-class brand owners and content creators, we have access to a far greater range of marks than would be available for purchase. It also helps to credibly assure licensors that we will prioritize their brands, properties and IP rather than explicitly competing with them with a broad-range of self-developed content-led offerings. We also license technology developed by unaffiliated inventors and product developers to enhance the design, innovation and functionality of our products.
We sell our products through our in-house sales staff and independent sales representatives to toy and mass-market retail chain stores, department stores, office supply stores, drug and grocery store chains, club stores, value-oriented dollar stores, toy specialty stores and wholesalers. Our two largest customers are Wal-Mart® and Target®, which accounted for 29.1% and 25.7%, respectively, of our net sales in 2020. No other customer accounted for more than 10% of our net sales in 2020.
Our Growth Strategy
Key elements of our growth strategy include:
●Expand Core Product Lines. We manage our existing and new brands through strategic product development initiatives, including introducing new products, modifying existing products and extending existing product lines to maximize their longevity. Our marketing teams and product designers strive to develop new products or product lines to offer added technological, aesthetic and functional improvements to our extensive portfolio.
●Enter New Product Categories. We use our extensive experience in the toy and other consumer product industries to evaluate products and licenses in new product categories and to develop additional product lines. We began marketing licensed classic video games for simple plug-in use with television sets and expanded into several related categories by infusing additional technologies such as motion gaming and through the licensing of this category from our current licensors, such as Disney. We recently entered the skateboard space at a retailer’s request and are now expanding into related protective gear and accessories.
●Pursue Strategic Acquisitions. We supplement our internal growth with selected strategic acquisitions. In October 2016, we acquired the operating assets of the C’est Moi® performance makeup and youth skincare product lines whose distribution was limited primarily to Asia. We launched a full line of makeup and skincare products branded under the C’est Moi name in the U.S. to a limited number of retail customers in 2018. In 2020, we evaluated several potential acquisitions although none resonated to the point of reaching an agreement.
●Acquire Additional Character and Product Licenses. We have acquired the rights to use many familiar brand and character names and logos from third parties that we use with our primary trademarks and brands. Currently, among others, we have license agreements with Nickelodeon, Disney, Pixar®, Marvel®, NBC Universal®, Microsoft®, Sega® and Warner Bros.®, as well as with the licensors of many other popular characters. We also license IP from other toy companies for categories in which they do not offer products found within our Core Product Lines. We intend to continue to pursue new licenses from these media & entertainment companies along with other licensors. We also intend to continue to purchase additional inventions and product concepts through our existing network of inventors and product developers.
●Expand International Sales. We believe that non-US markets: Europe, Australia, Canada, Latin America and Asia, offer us significant growth opportunities. In 2020, our sales generated outside the United States were approximately $94.7 million, or 18.4% of total net sales. In 2020, we migrated from a distributor model to selling direct in Spain, Italy, France and Mexico. Third-party distributors remain a core component of our international business, and we are constantly assessing how to expand our mutual businesses. Although the COVID-19 pandemic had a significantly negative impact on our international business, we remain focused on international being a source of revenue growth.
●Capitalize On Our Operating Efficiencies. We believe that our current infrastructure and operating model can accommodate growth without a proportionate increase in our operating and administrative expenses, thereby increasing our operating margins.
The execution of our growth strategy, however, is subject to several risks and uncertainties and we cannot assure you that we will continue to experience growth in, or maintain our present level of net sales (see “Risk Factors,” in Item 1A). For example, our growth strategy will place additional demands upon our management, operational capacity and financial resources and systems. The increased demand upon management may necessitate our recruitment and retention of additional qualified management personnel. We cannot assure you that we will be able to recruit and retain qualified personnel or expand and manage our operations effectively and profitably. To effectively manage future growth, we must continue to expand our operational, financial and management information systems and to train, motivate and manage our work force. While we believe that our operational, financial and management information systems will be adequate to support our future growth, no assurance can be given they will be adequate without significant investment in our infrastructure. Failure to expand our operational, financial and management information systems or to train, motivate or manage employees could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Moreover, implementation of our growth strategy is subject to risks beyond our control, including: competition; market acceptance of new products; changes in economic conditions; changes in the media & entertainment landscape disrupting the traditional model of capturing consumer attention for new entertainment-led offerings; our ability to obtain or renew licenses on commercially reasonable terms; and, our ability to finance increased levels of accounts receivable and inventory necessary to support our sales growth, if any.
Furthermore, we cannot assure you that we can identify attractive acquisition candidates or negotiate acceptable acquisition terms, and our failure to do so may adversely affect our results of operations and our ability to sustain growth.
Finally, our acquisition strategy involves a number of risks, each of which could adversely affect our operating results, including difficulties in integrating acquired businesses or product lines, assimilating new facilities and personnel and harmonizing diverse business strategies and methods of operation; diversion of management attention from operation of our existing business; loss of key personnel from acquired companies; and failure of an acquired business to achieve targeted financial results.
Industry Overview
According to Toy Association, Inc., the leading toy industry trade group, the United States is the world’s largest toy market, followed by China, Japan and Western Europe. Total retail sales of toys, excluding video games, in the United States, were approximately $25.1 billion in 2020. We believe the two largest United States toy companies, Hasbro and Mattel, collectively hold a dominant share of the U.S. toy market. In addition, hundreds of smaller companies compete in the design and development of new toys, the procurement of character and product licenses, and the improvement, expansion and re-introduction of previously established products and product lines.
Over the years, the toy industry has experienced substantial consolidation among both toy companies and toy retailers. We believe that the ongoing consolidation of toy companies provides us with increased growth opportunities due to retailers’ desire to not be entirely dependent upon a few dominant toy companies. Retailer concentration also enables us to ship products, manage account relationships and track point of sale information more effectively and efficiently.
Products
We focus our business on acquiring or licensing well-recognized properties, trademarks and/or brand names, and we seek to acquire evergreen brands which are less subject to market fads or trends. Generally, our license agreements for products and concepts call for royalties ranging from 1% to 25% of net sales, and some may require minimum royalty guarantees and up-front or advance royalty payments. Our principal products are highlighted above in our Company Overview.
Sales, Marketing and Distribution
We sell all of our products through our own in-house sales staff and independent sales representatives to toy and mass-market retail chain stores, department stores, office supply stores, drug and grocery store chains, club stores, dollar stores, toy specialty stores and wholesalers. In 2019, our two largest customers, Wal-Mart and Target, accounted for 29.6% and 20.8%, respectively, of our net sales. In 2020, our two largest customers, Wal-Mart and Target, accounted for 29.1% and 25.7%, respectively, of our net sales. No other customer accounted for more than 10% of our net sales in 2020. We generally sell products to our customers on open account with payment terms typically varying from 30 to 90 days or, in some cases, pursuant to letters of credit. For sales outside of the United States, we may also purchase credit insurance to mitigate the risk, if any, of non-payment. From time to time, we allow our customers credits against future purchases from us in order to facilitate their retail markdown and sales of slow-moving inventory. We also sell our products through e-commerce sites, including Walmart.com, Target.com and Amazon.com®.
We contract the manufacture of most of our products to unaffiliated manufacturers located in The People’s Republic of China (“China”). We sell the finished products to our customers, many of whom take title to the goods in Hong Kong or China. These methods allow us to reduce certain operating costs and working capital requirements. We also contract the manufacture of certain products from Hong Kong Meisheng Cultural Company Limited (“Meisheng”), which involved payment to Meisheng of approximately $64.8 million and $94.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019, respectively. As of December 31, 2020, Meisheng owns 9.2% of our outstanding common stock, and Zhao Xiaoqiang, one of our directors, is executive director of Meisheng. A portion of our sales originate in the United States, so we hold certain inventory in our warehouses and fulfillment facilities. To date, a majority of all of our sales has been to customers based in the United States. We intend to continue expanding distribution of our products into foreign territories and, accordingly, we have:
● |
entered into a joint venture in China; |
● |
engaged representatives to oversee sales in certain foreign territories; |
● |
engaged distributors in certain foreign territories; |
● |
established direct relationships with retailers in certain foreign territories; |
● |
opened sales offices in Canada, Europe and Mexico; and |
● |
opened distribution centers in the UK and Europe. |
Outside of the United States, we currently sell our products primarily in Europe, Australia, Canada, Latin America and Asia. Sales of our products abroad accounted for approximately $94.7 million, or 18.4% of our net sales in 2020 and approximately $117.3 million, or 19.6% of our net sales in 2019. We believe that foreign markets present an attractive opportunity, and we plan to intensify our marketing efforts and further expand our distribution channels abroad.
We establish reserves for allowances provided to our customers, including discounts, pricing concessions, promotional allowances and allowances for anticipated breakage or defective product, at the time of shipment. The reserves are determined as a percentage of sales based upon either historical experience or upon estimates or programs agreed upon with our customers.
We obtain, directly, or through our sales representatives, orders for our products from our customers and arrange for the manufacture of these products as discussed below. Cancellations generally are made in writing, and we take appropriate steps to notify our manufacturers of these cancellations. We may incur costs or other losses as a result of cancellations.
We maintain a full-time sales and marketing staff, many of whom make on-site visits to customers for the purpose of showing products and soliciting orders for products. We also retain a number of independent sales representatives to sell and promote our products, both domestically and internationally. Together with retailers, we occasionally test the consumer acceptance of new products in selected markets before committing resources to large-scale production.
We publicize and advertise our products online, in trade and consumer magazines and other publications, market our products at international, national and regional toy and other specialty trade shows, conventions and exhibitions and carry on cooperative advertising programs with toy and mass market retailers and other customers which include the use of print, online and television ads and via in-store displays. We also produce and broadcast television commercials for several of our product lines, if we expect that the resulting increase in our net sales will justify the relatively high cost of television advertising.
Product Development
Each of our product lines has an in-house manager responsible for product development. The in-house manager identifies and evaluates inventor products and concepts and other opportunities to enhance or expand existing product lines or to enter new product categories. In addition, we create proprietary products to fully exploit our concept and character licenses. Although we have the capability to create and develop products from inception to production, we also use third-parties to provide a portion of the sculpting, sample making, illustration and package design required for our products in order to accommodate our increasing product innovations and introductions as well as accelerate our speed-to-market. Typically, the development process takes from nine to eighteen months from concept to production and shipment to our customers, but given our Company’s size and structure, we have demonstrated the ability to shrink that down to three to nine months successfully when the opportunity requires.
We employ a staff of designers for all of our product lines. We occasionally acquire other product concepts from unaffiliated third parties. If we accept and develop a third-party’s concept for new toys, we generally pay a royalty on the sale of the toys developed from this concept, and may, on an individual basis, guarantee a minimum royalty. Royalties payable to inventors and developers generally range from 1% to 4% of the wholesale sales price for each unit of a product sold by us. We believe that utilizing experienced third-party inventors gives us access to a wide range of development talent. We currently work with numerous toy inventors and designers for the development of new products and the enhancement of existing products.
Safety testing of our products is done at the manufacturers’ facilities by quality control personnel employed by us or by independent third-party contractors engaged by us. Safety testing is designed to meet or exceed regulations imposed by federal and state, as well as applicable international governmental authorities, our retail partners, licensors and the Toy Association. We also closely monitor quality assurance procedures for our products for safety purposes. In addition, independent laboratories engaged by some of our larger customers and licensors test certain of our products.
Manufacturing and Supplies
Most of our products are currently produced by overseas third-party manufacturers, which we choose on the basis of quality, reliability and price. Consistent with industry practice, the use of third-party manufacturers enables us to avoid incurring fixed manufacturing costs, while maximizing flexibility, capacity and the latest production technology. Substantially all of the manufacturing services performed overseas for us are paid for on open account with the manufacturers. To date, we have not experienced any material delays in the delivery of our products; however, delivery schedules are subject to various factors beyond our control, and any delays in the future could adversely affect our sales. The COVID-19 pandemic, in particular, created some short-term delays as manufacturing capacity both dropped during the peak of the China outbreak and then again was stretched when consumer demand for different categories of products spiked as a result of the unprecedented level of households operating under confined-to-home/social distancing guidelines. Currently, we have ongoing relationships with over seventy different manufacturers. We believe that alternative sources of supply are available to us although we cannot be assured that we can obtain adequate supplies of manufactured products on short notice. We may also incur costs or other losses as a result of not placing orders consistent with our forecasts for product to be manufactured by our suppliers or manufacturers for a variety of reasons including customer order cancellations or a decline in demand.
Although we do not conduct the day-to-day manufacturing of our products, we are extensively involved in the design of product prototypes and production tools, dies and molds for our products and we seek to ensure quality control by actively reviewing the production process and testing the products produced by our manufacturers. We employ quality control inspectors who rotate among our manufacturers’ factories to monitor the production of substantially all of our products.
The principal raw materials used in the production and sale of our toy products are plastics, zinc alloy, plush, printed fabrics, paper products and electronic components, all of which are currently available at reasonable prices from a variety of sources. Although we do not directly manufacture our products, we own the majority of the tools, dies and molds used in the manufacturing process, and these are transferable among manufacturers if we choose to employ alternative manufacturers. Tools, dies and molds represent a substantial portion of our property and equipment with a net book value of $10.8 million in 2020 and $11.4 million in 2019; substantially all of these assets are located in China.
Patents, Trademarks, Copyrights and Licenses
We routinely pursue protection of our products through some form or combination of intellectual property right(s). We file patent applications where appropriate to protect our innovations arising from new development and design, and as a result, possess a portfolio of issued patents in the U.S. and abroad. Most of our products are produced and sold under trademarks owned by or licensed to us. In recent years, our rate of filing new trademark applications has increased. We also register certain aspects of some of our products with the U.S. Copyright Office. In the same vein, we enforce our rights against infringers because we recognize our intellectual property rights are significant assets that contribute to our success. Accordingly, while we believe we are sufficiently protected and the duration of our rights are aligned with the lifecycle of our products, the loss of some of these rights could have an adverse effect on our financial growth expectations and business operations.
Competition
Competition in the toy industry is intense. Globally, certain of our competitors have greater financial resources, larger sales and marketing and product development departments, stronger name recognition, wholly-owned brands and properties with high consumer awareness and appeal, longer operating histories and benefit from greater economies of scale. These factors, among others, may enable our competitors to market their products at lower prices or on terms more advantageous to customers than those we could offer for our competitive products. Competition often extends to the procurement of entertainment and product licenses, as well as the marketing and distribution of products and the obtaining of adequate shelf space. Competition may result in price reductions, reduced gross margins and loss of market share, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. In many of our product lines we compete directly against one or both of the toy industry’s two dominant companies, Mattel and Hasbro. In addition, we compete in our Halloween costume lines with Rubies II. We also compete with numerous smaller domestic and foreign toy manufacturers, importers and marketers in each of our product categories.
Seasonality and Backlog
In 2020, 71.8% of our net sales were made in the third and fourth quarters. Generally, the first quarter is the period of lowest shipments and sales in our business and in the toy industry and therefore it is also the least profitable quarter due to various fixed costs. Seasonality factors cause our operating results to fluctuate significantly from quarter to quarter. However, our seasonal products are primarily sold in the spring and summer seasons. Our results of operations may also fluctuate as a result of factors such as the timing of new products (and related expenses) introduced by us or our competitors, the theatrical/entertainment-led releases of licensed brands, the advertising activities of our competitors, delivery schedules set by our customers and the emergence of new market entrants. We believe, however, that the low retail price of most of our products may be less subject to seasonal fluctuations than higher-priced toy products.
We ship products in accordance with delivery schedules specified by our customers, who generally request delivery of products within three to six months of the date of their orders for orders shipped FOB China or Hong Kong and within three days for orders shipped domestically (i.e., from one of our warehouses). Because customer orders may be canceled at any time, often without penalty, our backlog may not accurately indicate sales for any future period.
Government and Industry Regulation
Our products are subject to the provisions of the Consumer Product Safety Act (“CPSA”), the Federal Hazardous Substances Act (“FHSA”), the Flammable Fabrics Act (“FFA”) and the regulations promulgated thereunder, and various other regulations in the European Union and other jurisdictions. The CPSA and the FHSA enable the Consumer Products Safety Commission (“CPSC”) to exclude from the market consumer products that fail to comply with applicable product safety regulations or otherwise create a substantial risk of injury, and articles that contain excessive amounts of a banned hazardous substance. The FFA enables the CPSC to regulate and enforce flammability standards for fabrics used in consumer products. The CPSC may also require the repurchase by the manufacturer of articles. Similar laws exist in some states and cities and in various international markets. We maintain a quality control program designed to ensure compliance with all applicable laws.
Human Capital
Our success comes from recruiting, retaining and motivating talented individuals around the world. JAKKS Pacific, Inc. continuously strives to create a safe, productive and harmonious work environment.
As of December 31, 2020, we had approximately 626 employees (including temporary and seasonal employees) working in over 8 countries worldwide to create innovative products and experiences that inspire, entertain, and develop children through play, with approximately 204 employees (33% of the total workforce) located outside the U.S.
The remaining workforce focuses on design, development, marketing, sales, finance, and other aspects of our business.
Employee Engagement
One of our main focuses is employee retention. We empower our management to identify top performers and mentor them. We encourage all employees to take advantage of in-house and external training programs and continuing education. Our Human Resources department has an open-door policy that encourages employees to seek career advancement advice. We utilize an “Employee Development Plan” which outlines both short-term and long-term career plans. Holding various events and workshops throughout the year, employees are encouraged to voice any concerns and/or to bring forth their ideas and suggestions.
Diversity and Inclusion
We are committed to fostering, cultivating and preserving a culture of diversity, equity and inclusion.
The collective sum of the individual differences, life experiences, knowledge, inventiveness, innovation, self-expression, unique capabilities and talent that our employees invest in their work represents a significant part of the culture.
We embrace and encourage employees’ differences in age, color, ability, ethnicity, family or marital status, gender identity or expression, language, national origin, physical and mental ability, political affiliation, race, religion, sexual orientation, socio-economic status, veteran status, and other characteristics.
Our diversity initiatives are applicable—but not limited—to practices and policies on recruitment and selection; compensation and benefits; professional development and training; promotions and transfers.
Training and Development
We take pride in offering the opportunity for employees to continuously learn and to grow their careers. Annually, employees are offered various types of training and the opportunity to continue their education. This includes both online and instructor-led training covering a variety of topics including: career-related, federally- and locally-mandated, JAKKS Pacific, Inc. Company policy and legal, financial services and health/wellness-related. Nearly all employees take advantage of these learning opportunities. In 2020, all courses and trainings were held online with excellent participation.
Health and Safety
We are committed to providing a safe, healthy and productive working environment for all of our employees globally.
In 2020 with the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, our number one priority was the health and safety of all of our employees, worldwide. The immediate and continuous response was to provide a remote work environment for employees (when available), implement enhanced protocols to provide a safe and sanitary working environment and offer on-site Covid-19 testing at no cost to employees and their dependents.
Environmental Issues
We may be subject to legal and financial obligations under environmental, health and safety laws in the United States and in other jurisdictions where we operate. We are not currently aware of any material environmental liabilities associated with any of our operations.
Available Information
We make available free of charge on or through our Internet website, www.jakks.com, our annual report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, and amendments to these reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file such material with, or furnish it to, the SEC. The contents of our website are not incorporated in or deemed to be a part of any such report.
Our Corporate Information
We were formed as a Delaware corporation in 1995. Our principal executive offices are located at 2951 28th Street, Santa Monica, California 90405. Our telephone number is (424) 268-9444 and our Internet Website address is www.jakks.com. The contents of our website are not incorporated in or deemed to be a part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
From time to time, including in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, we publish forward-looking statements, as disclosed in our Disclosure Regarding Forward-Looking Statements, immediately following the Table of Contents of this Annual Report. We note that a variety of factors could cause our actual results and experience to differ materially from the anticipated results or other expectations expressed or anticipated in our forward-looking statements. The factors listed below are risks and uncertainties that may arise and that may be detailed from time to time in our public announcements and our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, such as on Forms 8-K, 10-Q and 10-K. We undertake no obligation to make any revisions to the forward-looking statements contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K to reflect events or circumstances occurring after the date of the filing of this report.
Our inability to redesign, restyle and extend our existing core products and product lines as consumer preferences evolve, and to develop, introduce and gain customer acceptance of new products and product lines, may materially and adversely impact our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Our business and operating results depend largely upon the appeal of our products. Our continued success in the toy industry will depend upon our ability to redesign, restyle and extend our existing core products and product lines as consumer preferences evolve, and to develop, introduce and gain customer acceptance of new products and product lines. Several trends in recent years have presented challenges for the toy industry, including:
● |
the phenomenon of children outgrowing toys at younger ages, particularly in favor of interactive and high technology products; |
● |
increasing use of technology, broadly, be it taking share of children’s discretionary time or otherwise; |
● |
shorter life cycles for individual products; |
● |
higher consumer expectations for product quality, functionality and price-value; |
● |
a wider array of content offerings and platforms attracting a viable audience that enables a meaningful consumer products opportunity, and our ability to effectively predict those platforms and offerings given the increasingly fragmented content distribution marketplace; |
● |
the evolving media landscape increases the cost and complexity of advertising our products directly to end-consumers, and similarly our ability to effectively predict the most effective advertising platforms could adversely impact our ability to introduce and sell our product lines at planned levels or better; and |
● |
consumer shopping habits migrating from traditional “brick & mortar” browsing to more online experiences. We cannot be assured that this change will not adversely impact our historical ability to have our newest product offerings discovered, evaluated and appreciated sufficiently to motivate purchase and ultimately build word-of-mouth endorsement about the value of our offerings. |
We cannot assure you that:
● |
our current products will continue to be popular with consumers; |
● |
the products that we introduce will achieve any significant degree of market acceptance; |
● |
our support of customers with an online shopping proposition is expected to lead to a comparable degree of sales or margins through the offline shopping experience should consumer behavior migrate more of our business in that direction; |
|
● |
the life cycles of our products will be sufficient to permit us to recover our inventory costs, and licensing, design, manufacturing, marketing and other costs associated with those products; or |
● |
our inclusion of new technology will result in higher sales or increased profits. |
Any or all of the foregoing factors may adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.
There are risks associated with our license agreements.
● |
Our current licenses require us to pay minimum royalties. |
Sales of products under trademarks or trade or brand names licensed from others account for substantially all of our net sales. Product licenses allow us to capitalize on characters, designs, concepts and inventions owned by others or developed by toy inventors and designers. Our license agreements generally require us to make specified minimum royalty payments, even if we fail to sell a sufficient number of units to generate these dollar amounts under the percentage of sales basis under which most agreements are written. Some of our license agreements have additional requirements for marketing spend for the brands licensed. Some of our license agreements disallow certain retailer credits and deductions from the sales base on which royalties are calculated, including in some cases uncollectable accounts. In addition, under certain of our license agreements, if we fail to achieve certain prescribed sales targets, we may be unable to retain or renew these licenses which may adversely impact our business, results of operations and financial condition. Many of our license agreements, although multi-year in total, require us to pay a minimum level of royalties annually that cannot be recouped outside of selling during that time period (often 12 months). There may also be minimum commitments assigned to specific geographic regions or countries. As a result, sudden shocks to the market, such as has been the case with COVID-19 or when a foundational retailer goes bankrupt, might leave us with these fixed expenses unless licensors are willing to renegotiate terms in consideration for the unexpected nature of the shock. Contractual minimal royalty payments are almost always fixed and determined upon signing, so these sorts of shocks could have a negative impact on our business, results of operations and financial condition for multiple years given the nature and timing of the shock.
● |
Some of our licenses are restricted as to use and include other restrictive provisions. |
Under the majority of our license agreements, the licensors have the right to review and approve our use of their licensed products, designs or materials before we may make any sales. If a licensor refuses to permit our use of any licensed property in the way we propose, or if their review process is delayed or not timely, our development, manufacturing and/or sale of new products could be impeded. Our licensing agreements include other restrictive provisions, such as limitations of the time period in which we have to sell existing inventory upon expiration of the license, requiring licensor approval of contract manufacturers and approval of marketing and promotional materials, limitations on channels of distribution, including internet sales, change of ownership clauses that require licensor approval of such change and may require a fee to be paid under certain circumstances and various other provisions that may have an adverse impact on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
● |
New licenses can be difficult and expensive to obtain and in some cases, retain. |
Our continued success will substantially depend upon our ability to maintain existing relevant and obtain new additional licenses. Intense competition exists for desirable licenses in our industry. We cannot assure you that we will be able to secure or renew significant licenses on terms acceptable to us. In addition, as we add licenses, the need to fund additional capital expenditures, royalty advances and guaranteed minimum royalty payments may strain our cash resources. Often times, licensors require cash advance payments upon signing agreements against future minimum royalty obligations, which requires us to pay out cash several quarters prior to our ability to ship, invoice and ultimately collect revenue from the related product sales. In addition, there might be licensor or consumer expectations that certain toy products contain music or musical elements related to the original entertainment. Those music rights must be separately acquired at additional expense, and as a result can adversely affect our profitability and competitiveness at retail.
● |
A limited number of licensors account for a large portion of our net sales. |
We derive a significant portion of our net sales from a limited number of licensors, one of which accounts for over 62% of our net sales. If one or more of these licensors were to terminate or fail to renew our licenses or not grant us new licenses, our business, results of operations and financial condition could be adversely affected.
The failure of our character-related and theme-related products to become and/or remain popular with children may materially and adversely impact our business, results of operations and financial condition.
The success of many of our character-related and theme-related products depends upon the popularity of characters in movies, television programs, live sporting exhibitions, and other media and events. By extension, any sudden disruption in that calendar can have negative repercussions to our business, both in terms of recouping our investments to date, as well as, monetizing those investments at the profit margins we have planned. As we have a 9-18-month concept-to-market timeline depending on the product category, there is a degree of exposure given our dependence on third parties to adhere to their planned schedules. We cannot assure you that:
● |
entertainment content associated with our character-related and theme-related product lines will be released at the times we expect, via the media we expected and/or will reach a wide enough audience to generate the level of consumer demand we anticipated in agreeing to sign the license and develop our product line; |
● |
the success of entertainment content associated with our existing character-related and theme-related product lines will result in substantial promotional value to our products; |
● |
we will be successful in renewing licenses upon expiration of terms that are favorable to us; |
● |
we will be successful in obtaining licenses to produce new character-related and theme-related products in the future; |
● |
we will continue to be able to assess effectively our licensors’ ability to launch new brands in a manner to effectively create a market for consumer products given the rapidly changing content distribution landscape and a potential reprioritization of their goals for their content launches; or |
● |
we will continue to be able to effectively assess the longevity and market appetite for consumer products for pre-existing licensor brands given the ever-increasing competition for consumer’s attention and discretionary spending. |
Our failure to achieve any or all of the foregoing benchmarks may cause the infrastructure of our operations to fail, thereby adversely affecting our business, results of operations and financial condition.
A limited number of customers account for a large portion of our net sales, so that if one or more of our major customers were to experience difficulties in fulfilling their obligations to us, cease doing business with us, significantly reduce the amount of their purchases from us or return substantial amounts of our products, it could have a materially adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Our two largest customers, Wal-Mart and Target, accounted for 54.8% of our net sales in 2020. Except for outstanding purchase orders for specific products, we do not have written contracts with, or commitments from, any of our customers, and pursuant to the terms of certain of our vendor agreements, even some purchase orders may be cancelled without penalty up until delivery. A substantial reduction in or termination of orders from any of our largest customers would adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition. In addition, pressure by large customers seeking price reductions, financial incentives and changes in other terms of sale or for us to bear the risks and the cost of carrying inventory could also adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition. For example, the bankruptcy and liquidation of Toys “R” Us (“TRU”) in the United States, and in certain other jurisdictions around the world, had a material, adverse impact on the toy industry and our business, results of operations and financial condition. In 2017, TRU was our third largest customer with net sales of $69.5 million. In 2018, net sales to TRU declined by over 76.1% to $16.6 million. In addition to the reduction in net sales, we also recorded significant bad debt charges in 2017 and 2018 as a result of the TRU bankruptcy and liquidation.
If one or more of our major customers were to experience difficulties in fulfilling their obligations to us resulting from bankruptcy or other deterioration in their financial condition or ability to meet their obligations, cease doing business with us, significantly reduce the amount of their purchases from us, or return substantial amounts of our products, it could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition. The COVID-19 pandemic has left many customers outside of our largest customers under varying degrees of financial distress, and it seems some of our largest customers are facing increases in their operating costs. Customers may request extended payment terms which may require us to take on increased credit risk or to reduce or forgo sales entirely in an attempt to mitigate financial risk associated with customer bankruptcy risk.
Restrictions under or the loss of availability under our term loan and revolving credit line could adversely impact our business and financial condition.
In August 2019, we entered into and consummated multiple, binding definitive agreements among Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd. and an ad hoc group of holders of our 4.875% convertible senior notes due 2020 to recapitalize our balance sheet, including the extension to us of incremental liquidity and at least three-year extensions of substantially all of our outstanding convertible debt obligations and revolving credit facility.
All outstanding borrowings under the revolving credit line and term loan are accelerated and become immediately due and payable (and the revolving credit line and term loan terminate) in the event of a default, which includes, among other things, failure to comply with certain financial covenants or breach of representations contained in the credit line and term loan documents, defaults under other loans or obligations, involvement in bankruptcy proceedings, an occurrence of a change of control or an event constituting a material adverse effect on us (as such terms are defined in the credit line and term loan documents). We are also subject to negative covenants which, during the life of the credit line and term loan, prohibit and/or limit us from, among other things, incurring certain types of other debt, acquiring other companies, making certain expenditures or investments, and changing the character of our business. An outbreak of infectious disease, a pandemic or a similar public health threat, such as the 2019 Novel Coronavirus outbreak (see below), could adversely impact our ability to comply with such covenants. Our failure to comply with such covenants or any other breach of the credit line or term loan agreements could cause a default and we may then be required to repay borrowings under our credit line and term loan with capital from other sources. We could also be blocked from future borrowings or obtaining letters of credit under the revolving credit line, and the credit line agreement and the term loan could be terminated by the lenders. Under these circumstances, other sources of capital may not be available or may be available only on unfavorable terms. In the event of a default, it is possible that our assets and certain of our subsidiaries’ assets may be attached or seized by the lenders. Any (i) failure by us to comply with the covenants or other provisions of the credit line and term loan, (ii) difficulty in securing any required future financing, or (iii) any such seizure or attachment of assets could have a material adverse effect on our business and financial condition. Our revolving credit line and term loan mature in August 2022 and February 2023, respectively.
We may not have the funds necessary to purchase our outstanding convertible senior notes upon a fundamental change or other purchase date, as required by the indenture governing the notes.
In June 2014, we sold an aggregate of $115.0 million principal amount of 4.875% convertible senior notes due on June 1, 2020 (the “4.875% 2020 Notes”). In July 2013, we sold an aggregate of $100.0 million principal amount of 4.25% convertible senior notes due on August 1, 2018, of which no amounts are currently outstanding, but $29.6 million were exchanged for new notes due on November 1, 2020 (the “3.25% 2020 Notes” and collectively with the 4.875% 2020 Notes, the “Notes”). In August 2019, the 3.25% 2020 Notes were amended and, among other changes, now mature on the earlier of (i) 91 days after the repayment in full of the newly issued secured term loan that matures in February 2023 or (ii) July 2023 (the “3.25% 2023 Notes”). In addition, a portion of the 4.875% 2020 Notes was exchanged for additional 3.25% 2023 Notes. As of December 31, 2020, approximately $22.9 million of the 3.25% 2023 Notes are outstanding. Holders of the Notes may require us to repurchase for cash all or some of their notes upon the occurrence of a fundamental change (as defined in the Notes). Holders of the Notes may convert their notes upon the occurrence of specified events. Upon conversion, the Notes will be settled in shares of our common stock and/or in cash. Restrictions on borrowings under or loss of our revolving credit line could result in our not having the funds necessary to pay the Notes upon a fundamental change or other purchase date, as required by the indenture governing the Notes.
The agreement governing our outstanding preferred stock includes terms and conditions that may adversely impact our business and cash flows.
In August 2019, we issued a series of preferred stock with a face amount of $20.0 million. The preferred stock (i) is senior to our common stock, (ii) not convertible into common stock, (iii) earns a dividend at an annual rate of 6% (which may or may not be paid in cash), (iv) includes a liquidation preference of up to 150% of the accrued amount, and (v) includes the right to elect up to two members to the Company’s Board of Directors, among other rights, terms and conditions. In addition, the series of preferred stock includes other protective rights and provisions, such as amendments to the Company’s bylaws to restrict changes that may adversely impact the rights of the preferred stockholders, engaging in businesses that are not permitted businesses, as defined, limitations on assets dispositions and entering into a change of control transaction without the approval of the preferred stockholders. Some of these rights, restrictions and other terms and conditions may prevent us from taking advantageous actions with respect to our business, result in our inability to respond effectively to competitive pressures and industry developments, and/or adversely affect our cash flows or operations.
We depend upon our Chief Executive Officer and any loss or interruption of his services could adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Our success has been largely dependent upon the experience and continued services of Stephen G. Berman, our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer. Though Mr. Berman is under contract through 2024, we cannot assure you that we would be able to find an appropriate replacement for Mr. Berman should the need arise, and any loss or interruption of the services of Mr. Berman could adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Market conditions and other third-party conduct could negatively impact our margins and implementation of other business initiatives.
Economic conditions, such as decreased consumer confidence or a recession, may adversely impact our business, results of operations and financial condition. In addition, general economic conditions were significantly and negatively affected by the September 11th terrorist attacks and could be similarly affected by any future attacks. The COVID-19 pandemic had a negative impact to our business in 2020 by disrupting consumer behavior, spending patterns and ultimately the play patterns and events that often motivate purchasing of our products. Furthermore, restrictions on nearly all of our customers’ operating hours at one point in the year or another, limited consumers’ ability to discover our products thru traditional in-store browsing and unplanned purchase. Continuation of such a weakened economic and business climate, as well as consumer uncertainty created by such a climate, could further adversely affect our sales and profitability. Other conditions, such as the unavailability of electronic components or other raw materials, for example, may impede our ability to manufacture, source and ship new and continuing products on a timely basis. Significant and sustained increases in the price of oil, for example, could adversely impact the cost of the raw materials used in the manufacture of certain of our products, such as plastic.
We face risks related to health epidemics and other widespread outbreaks of contagious disease, which could significantly disrupt our supply chain and impact our operating results.
Significant outbreaks of contagious diseases, and other adverse public health developments, could have a material impact on our business operations and operating results. In December 2019, a strain of Novel Coronavirus causing respiratory illness and death emerged in the city of Wuhan in the Hubei province of China. The Chinese government took certain emergency measures to combat the spread of the virus, including extension of the Lunar New Year holiday, implementation of travel bans and closure of factories and businesses. The majority of our materials and products are sourced from suppliers located in China.
The COVID-19 virus was ultimately declared a global pandemic by the World Health Organization and has been spreading throughout the world, including the United States, resulting in emergency measures, including travel bans, closure of retail stores, and restrictions on gatherings of more than a maximum number of people. These outbreaks are disruptive to local economies and commercial activity, and create downward pressure on our ability to make our product line available to consumers or for consumers to purchase our products, even if our products are available. At this time, we cannot predict with any certainty the further duration and depth of the impact in the United States or other places worldwide where we sell our products or manufacture our products. Accordingly, it is extremely challenging to estimate the extent by which we will be negatively impacted by this disease. While the governmental organizations of the United States, as well as governments across the world, have implemented emergency economic measures and announced the consideration of additional emergency economic assistance packages, it is unclear what impact they are having, and will have, on the economy in the United States and worldwide. Uncertainty surrounds the length of time this disease will continue to spread, and the extent governments will continue to impose, or add additional, quarantines, curfews, travel restrictions and closures of retail stores. In addition, even following control of the disease and the end of the pandemic, the economic dislocation caused by the disease to so many people may linger and be so significant that consumers’ focus could be directed away from consumer discretionary spending for products such as ours for an extended period of time. For all of these reasons, at this time we cannot quantify the extent of the impact this disease will have on our sales, net income and cash flows, but it could be quite significant.
Our business is seasonal and therefore our annual operating results will depend, in large part, on our sales during the relatively brief holiday shopping season. This seasonality is exacerbated by retailers’ quick response to inventory management techniques.
Sales of our products at retail are extremely seasonal, with a majority of retail sales occurring during the period from September through December in anticipation of the holiday season. Further, ecommerce is growing significantly and accounts for a higher portion of the ultimate sales of our products. Ecommerce retailers tend to hold less inventory and take inventory closer to the time of sale to consumers than traditional retailers. As a result, customers are timing their orders so that they are being filled by suppliers, such as us, closer to the time of purchase by consumers. For our products, a majority of retail sales for the entire year generally occur in the fourth quarter, close to the holiday season. As a consequence, the majority of our sales to our customers occur in the third and fourth quarters, as our customers do not want to maintain large on-hand inventories throughout the year, ahead of consumer demand. While these techniques reduce a retailer’s investment in inventory, they increase pressure on suppliers like us to fill orders promptly and thereby shift a significant portion of inventory risk and carrying costs to the supplier. The level of inventory carried by retailers may also reduce or delay retail sales resulting in lower revenues for us. If we or our customers determine that one of our products is more popular at retail than was originally anticipated, we may not have sufficient time to produce and ship enough additional products to fully meet consumer demand. Additionally, the logistics of supplying more and more product within shorter time periods increases the risk that we will fail to achieve tight and compressed shipping schedules and quality control, which also may reduce our sales and harm our results of operations. This seasonal pattern requires significant use of working capital, mainly to manufacture or acquire inventory during the portion of the year prior to the holiday season, and it requires accurate forecasting of demand for products during the holiday season in order to avoid losing potential sales of popular products or producing excess inventory of products that are less popular with consumers. Our failure to accurately predict and respond to consumer demand, resulting in under-producing popular items and/or overproducing less popular items, could significantly reduce our total sales, negatively impact our cash flows, increase the risk of inventory obsolescence, and harm our results of operations and financial condition. In addition, as a result of the seasonal nature of our business, we would be significantly and adversely affected, in a manner disproportionate to the impact on a company with sales spread more evenly throughout the year, by unforeseen events such as a terrorist attack or economic shock that harm the retail environment or consumer buying patterns during our key selling season, or by events such as strikes or port delays that interfere with the shipment of goods, during the critical months leading up to the holiday shopping season.
The COVID-19 pandemic has also accelerated consumers’ shift to ecommerce transactions with traditional brick & mortar retailers. Some of these transactions are for “Ship-to-home” purchases and some are for local pick-up by the consumer at the brick & mortar location. In either case, the consumer’s path to discovery of new items changes to a digital medium. It remains to be seen whether this change has a negative adverse impact on consumers’ ability to discover the breadth and depth of our product range or whether it discourages adding incremental unplanned purchases to the shopping cart. Either scenario could have a negative impact on our overall business performance.
Our Halloween (Disguise) business is even more seasonal than our core Toy/Consumer Products business. This seasonality is further exacerbated by consumer migration to online shopping as the style and size attributes of the Halloween business (i.e., we make the same costume in multiple sizes, and the same item “costume” across a very wide range of brands and properties) in part behaves like an apparel-driven transaction rather than “one-size-for-all” toy/consumer product transaction.
In 2020, COVID-19 was an unexpected shock to the market, making the traditional Halloween experience less feasible to celebrate in its traditional manner. It had a material impact on our sales of related product. Any similar event that suddenly makes the holiday less relevant or infeasible to celebrate can and likely will have a negative impact on that segment of business. Given that securing licenses, product design and development and ultimately sourcing of the product takes place months in advance of the actual Halloween selling season, we have limited ability to recover invested expense if the market demand for those products were to suddenly be reduced. Although some product could be held in inventory or materials rolled forward to the next manufacturing season, these events would in turn incrementally tie up our capital until the following year at best, and/or put added strain on our third-party manufacturers.
We depend upon third-party manufacturers, and if our relationship with any of them is harmed or if they independently encounter difficulties in their manufacturing processes, we could experience product defects, production delays, unplanned costs or higher product costs, or the inability to fulfill orders on a timely basis, any of which could adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.
We depend upon many third-party manufacturers who develop, provide and use the tools, dies and molds that we generally own to manufacture our products. However, we have limited control over the manufacturing processes themselves. As a result, any difficulties encountered by the third-party manufacturers that result in product defects, production delays, cost overruns or the inability to fulfill orders on a timely basis, could adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.
We do not have long-term contracts with our third-party manufacturers. Although we believe we could secure other third-party manufacturers to produce our products, our operations would be adversely affected if we suddenly lost our relationship with any of our current suppliers or if our current suppliers’ operations or sea or air transportation with our overseas manufacturers were disrupted or terminated even for a relatively short period of time. Our tools, dies and molds are located at the facilities of our third-party manufacturers. Although we own the majority of those tools, dies and molds, our ability to retrieve them and move them to a new manufacturer might be limited by lack of manufacturing equipment compatibility. In addition, the current COVID-19 pandemic has made on-site engagement of our vendor base more challenging.
Although we do not purchase the raw materials used to manufacture our products, we are potentially subject to variations in the prices we pay our third-party manufacturers for products, depending upon what they pay for their raw materials. We may also incur costs or other losses as a result of not placing orders consistent with our forecasts for product manufactured by our suppliers or manufacturers for a variety of reasons including customer order cancellations or a decline in demand. In the event that some unexpected shock to the market (like the COVID-19 pandemic) were to suddenly drastically change demand for product anticipated to be procured from our third-party manufacturers, we may incur some costs relating to raw materials they have ordered on our behalf, and/or finished goods that were not shipped due to last-minute cancelled orders from our customers buying FOB from China.
The toy industry is highly competitive and our inability to compete effectively may materially and adversely impact our business, results of operations and financial condition.
The toy industry is highly competitive. Globally, certain of our competitors have financial and strategic advantages over us, including:
● |
greater financial resources; |
● |
larger sales, marketing and product development departments; |
● |
stronger brand name recognition and/or well-established owned brands/trademark; |
|
● |
broader international sales and marketing infrastructure; |
● |
longer operating histories; and |
● |
greater economies of scale. |
In addition, the toy industry has no significant barriers to entry. Competition is based primarily upon the ability to design and develop new toys, procure licenses for popular characters and trademarks, and successfully market products. Many of our competitors offer similar products or alternatives to our products. Our competitors have obtained and are likely to continue to obtain licenses that overlap our licenses with respect to products, geographic areas and retail channels. We cannot assure you that we will be able to obtain adequate shelf space in retail stores to support our existing products, expand our products and product lines or continue to compete effectively against current and future competitors.
Our corporate headquarters, fulfillment center and information technology systems are in Southern California, and if these operations are disrupted, we may not be able to operate our core functions and/or ship merchandise to our customers, which would adversely affect our business.
Our corporate headquarters, distribution center and information technology systems are in Santa Monica and the City of Industry, California, and the overwhelming majority of our U.S.-based staff lives in Southern California. If we encounter any disruptions to our operations within these buildings, or if they were to shut down for any reason, including by fire or other natural disaster, or as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, then we may be prevented from effectively operating, shipping and processing our merchandise. Furthermore, the risk of disruption or shut down at these buildings and/or within the Southern California community is greater than it might be if they were located in another region as Southern California is prone to natural disasters such as earthquakes and wildfires. Any disruption or shut down at these locations could significantly impact our operations and have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.
We have substantial sales and manufacturing operations outside of the United States, subjecting us to risks common to international operations.
We sell products and operate facilities in numerous countries outside the United States. Sales to our international customers comprised approximately 18.4% of our net sales for the year ended 2020 and approximately 19.6% of our net sales for year ended 2019. Although COVID-19 disproportionately negatively impacted our international business in 2020, we expect our sales to international customers to account for a greater portion of our revenues in future fiscal periods. Additionally, we use third-party manufacturers, located principally in China, and are subject to the risks normally associated with international operations, including:
● |
currency conversion risks and currency fluctuations; |
● |
limitations, including taxes, on the repatriation of earnings; |
● |
political instability, civil unrest and economic instability; |
● |
greater difficulty enforcing intellectual property rights and weaker laws protecting such rights; |
● |
complications in complying with laws in varying jurisdictions and changes in governmental policies; |
● |
greater difficulty and expenses associated with recovering from natural disasters, such as earthquakes, hurricanes and floods; |
● |
transportation delays and interruption, inclusive of raw material’s sourcing to our third-party manufacturers as well as finished goods delivery through to our customers and ultimate consumers; |
● |
work stoppages; |
● |
the potential imposition of tariffs; and |
● |
the pricing of intercompany transactions may be challenged by taxing authorities in both foreign jurisdictions and the United States, with potential increases in income and other taxes. |
Our reliance upon external sources of manufacturing can be shifted, over a period of time, to alternative sources of supply, should such changes be necessary. However, if we were prevented from obtaining products or components for a material portion of our product line due to regulatory, political, labor or other factors beyond our control, our operations would be disrupted while alternative sources of products were secured. Also, the imposition of trade sanctions by the United States against a class of products imported by us from, or the loss of “normal trade relations” status by China could significantly increase our cost of products imported from that nation. Because of the importance of international sales and international sourcing of manufacturing to our business, our results of operations and financial condition could be significantly and adversely affected if any of the risks described above were to occur.
Legal proceedings may harm our business, results of operations, and financial condition.
We are a party to lawsuits and other legal proceedings in the normal course of our business. Litigation and other legal proceedings can be expensive, lengthy, and disruptive to normal business operations. Moreover, the results of complex legal proceedings are difficult to predict. We cannot provide assurance that we will not be a party to additional legal proceedings in the future. To the extent legal proceedings continue for long time periods or are adversely resolved, our business, results of operations, and financial condition could be significantly harmed.
Our business is subject to extensive government regulation and any violation by us of such regulations could result in product liability claims, loss of sales, diversion of resources, damage to our reputation, increased warranty costs or removal of our products from the market, and we cannot assure you that our product liability insurance for the foregoing will be sufficient.
Our business is subject to various laws, including the Federal Hazardous Substances Act, the Consumer Product Safety Act, the Flammable Fabrics Act and the rules and regulations promulgated under these acts. These statutes are administered by the Consumer Product Safety Commission (“CPSC”), which has the authority to remove from the market products that are found to be defective and present a substantial hazard or risk of serious injury or death. The CPSC can require a manufacturer to recall, repair or replace these products under certain circumstances. We cannot assure you that defects in our products will not be alleged or found. Any such allegations or findings could result in:
● |
product liability claims; |
● |
loss of sales; |
● |
diversion of resources; |
● |
damage to our reputation; |
● |
increased warranty and insurance costs; and |
● |
removal of our products from the market. |
Any of these results may adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition. There can be no assurance that our product liability insurance will be sufficient to avoid or limit our loss in the event of an adverse outcome of any product liability claim.
We depend upon our proprietary rights, and our inability to safeguard and maintain the same, or claims of third-parties that we have violated their intellectual property rights, could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
We rely upon trademark, copyright and trade secret protection, nondisclosure agreements and licensing arrangements to establish, protect and enforce our proprietary rights in our products. The laws of certain foreign countries may not protect intellectual property rights to the same extent or in the same manner as the laws of the United States. We cannot assure you that we or our licensors will be able to successfully safeguard and maintain our proprietary rights. Further, certain parties have commenced legal proceedings or made claims against us based upon our alleged patent infringement, misappropriation of trade secrets or other violations of their intellectual property rights. We cannot assure you that other parties will not assert intellectual property claims against us in the future. These claims could divert our attention from operating our business or result in unanticipated legal and other costs, which could adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Restructuring our workforce can be disruptive and harm our results of operations and financial condition.
We have in the past restructured or made other adjustments to our workforce in response to the economic environment, performance issues, acquisitions, and other internal and external considerations. Restructurings can among other things result in a temporary lack of focus, reductions in net sales and reduced productivity. In addition, we may be unable to realize the anticipated cost savings from our previously announced restructuring efforts or may incur additional and/or unexpected costs in order to realize the anticipated savings. The amounts of anticipated cost savings and anticipated expenses-related restructurings are based on our current estimates, but they involve risks, uncertainties, assumptions and other factors that may cause actual results, performance or achievements to be materially different from those previously planned. These impacts, among others, could occur in connection with previously announced restructuring efforts, or related to future acquisitions and other restructurings and, as a result, our results of operations and financial condition could be negatively affected. In particular, in April 2020 the company executed a restructuring of its workforce to mitigate costs in light of reduced revenue expectations attributable to the COVID-19 pandemic.
The inability to successfully defend claims from taxing authorities or the adoption of new tax legislation could adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.
We conduct business in many countries, which requires us to interpret the income tax laws and rulings in each of those jurisdictions. Due to the complexity of tax laws in those jurisdictions as well as the subjectivity of factual interpretations, our estimates of income tax liabilities may differ from actual payments or assessments. Claims from tax authorities related to these differences could have an adverse impact on our results of operations and financial condition. In addition, legislative bodies in the various countries in which we do business may from time to time adopt new tax legislation that could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
We may not be able to sustain or manage our product line growth, which may prevent us from increasing our net revenues.
Historically, we experienced growth in our product lines through acquisitions of businesses, products and licenses. This growth in product lines has contributed significantly to our total revenues over the years. Even though we have had no significant acquisitions since 2012, comparing our future period-to-period operating results may not be meaningful and results of operations from prior periods may not be indicative of future results. We cannot assure that we will continue to experience growth in, or maintain our present level of, net sales.
Our growth strategy calls for us to continuously develop and diversify our toy business by acquiring other companies, entering into additional license agreements, refining our product lines, expanding into adjacent Toys/Consumer Products/Costume categories and expanding into international markets, which will place additional demands upon our management, operational capacity and financial resources and systems. The increased demand upon management may necessitate our recruitment and retention of qualified management personnel. We cannot assure that we will be able to recruit and retain qualified personnel or expand and manage our operations effectively and profitably. To effectively manage future growth, we must continue to expand our operational, financial and management information systems and to train, motivate and manage our work force. There can be no assurance that our operational, financial and management information systems will be adequate to support our future operations. Failure to expand our operational, financial and management information systems or to train, motivate or manage employees could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
In addition, implementation of our growth strategy is subject to risks beyond our control, including competition, market acceptance of new products, changes in economic conditions, our ability to obtain or renew licenses on commercially reasonable terms, our ability to identify acquisition candidates and conclude acquisitions on acceptable terms, and our ability to obtain the required consents from certain lenders and finance increased levels of accounts receivable and inventory necessary to support our sales growth, if any. Accordingly, we cannot assure that our growth strategy will be successful.
We rely extensively on information technology in our operations, and any material failure, inadequacy, interruption, or security breach of that technology could have a material adverse impact on our business.
We rely extensively on information technology systems across our operations, including for management of our supply chain, sale and delivery of our products and services, reporting our results of operations, collection and storage of consumer data, data of customers, employees and other stakeholders, and various other processes and transactions. Many of these systems are managed by third-party service providers. We use third-party technology and systems for a variety of reasons, including, without limitation, encryption and authentication technology, employee email, content delivery to customers, back-office support, and other functions. In any given year, a small volume of our consumer products and services may rely on a component or element which is internet-enabled, and may be offered in conjunction with business partners or such third-party service providers. We, our business partners and third-party service providers may collect, process, store and transmit consumer data, including personal information, in connection with those products and services. Failure to follow applicable regulations related to those activities, or to prevent or mitigate data loss or other security breaches, including breaches of our business partners’ technology and systems, could expose us or our customers to a risk of loss or misuse of such information, which could adversely affect our results of operations, result in regulatory enforcement, other litigation and could be a potential liability for us, and otherwise significantly harm our business. Our ability to effectively manage our business and coordinate the production, distribution, and sale of our products and services depends significantly on the reliability and capacity of these systems and third-party service providers.
Although we have developed systems and processes that are designed to protect customer information and prevent data loss and other security breaches, including systems and processes designed to reduce the impact of a security breach at a third-party provider, such measures cannot provide absolute security. We have exposures to similar security risks faced by other large companies that have data stored on their information technology systems. To our knowledge, we have not experienced any material breach of our cybersecurity systems. If our systems or our third-party service providers' systems fail to operate effectively or are damaged, destroyed, or shut down, or there are problems with transitioning to upgraded or replacement systems, or there are security breaches in these systems, any of the aforementioned could occur as a result of natural disasters, human error, software or equipment failures, telecommunications failures, loss or theft of equipment, acts of terrorism, circumvention of security systems, or other cyber-attacks, including denial-of-service attacks, we could experience delays or decreases in product sales, and reduced efficiency of our operations. Additionally, any of these events could lead to violations of privacy laws, loss of customers, or loss, misappropriation or corruption of confidential information, trade secrets or data, which could expose us to potential litigation, regulatory actions, sanctions or other statutory penalties, any or all of which could adversely affect our business, and cause it to incur significant losses and remediation costs.
The COVID-19 pandemic required most of our employees to work remotely, putting unprecedented strain on our information technology resources and infrastructure. We cannot be sure how long the work-from-home model will stay in place and how mandates around social distancing and extensive remote work will generate new and unforeseen risks of business disruption and increased complexity across the range of functions that comprise the Company’s daily activities. In addition, by deploying the work-from-home model, we increase our vulnerability to hacking and other nefarious activities as employees adjust to new hardware/software infrastructure and resources as well as close the gap created by no longer being in close physical proximity to their colleagues. Although all employees are required to use work infrastructure and our secure VPN, we cannot be completely certain that we will not have increased exposure to security considerations in this new environment.
If we are unable to acquire and integrate companies and new product lines successfully, we will be unable to implement a significant component of our growth strategy.
Our growth strategy depends, in part, upon our ability to acquire companies and new product lines. Future acquisitions, if any, may succeed only if we can effectively assess characteristics of potential target companies and product lines, such as:
● |
attractiveness of products; |
● |
suitability of distribution channels; |
● |
management ability; |
● |
financial condition and results of operations; |
● |
the degree to which acquired operations can be integrated with our operations; and |
|
● |
appropriate valuation and our ability to create substantially more value post-acquisition. |
We cannot assure you that we can identify attractive acquisition candidates or negotiate acceptable acquisition terms, and our failure to do so may adversely affect our results of operations and our ability to sustain growth. Our acquisition strategy involves a number of risks, each of which could adversely affect our operating results, including:
● |
difficulties in integrating acquired businesses or product lines, assimilating new facilities and personnel and harmonizing diverse business strategies and methods of operation; |
● |
diversion of management attention from operation of our existing business; |
● |
loss of key personnel from acquired companies; |
● |
failure of an acquired business to achieve targeted financial results; |
● |
limited capital to finance acquisitions and/or fund appropriate working capital post-acquisition; and |
● |
inability to maintain or secure relevant licenses to maintain or expand the net sales of acquired business. |
We may engage in strategic transactions that could negatively impact our liquidity, increase our expenses and present significant distractions to our management.
We may consider strategic transactions and business arrangements, including, but not limited to, acquisitions, asset purchases, partnerships, joint ventures, restructurings, divestitures and investments. Any such transaction may require us to incur non-recurring or other charges, may increase our near and long-term expenditures and may pose significant integration challenges or disrupt our management or business, which could harm our operations and financial results.
If securities or industry analysts publish inaccurate or unfavorable research about our business, the price and trading volume of our common stock could decline.
The trading market for our common stock depends in part on the research and reports that securities or industry analysts publish about us or our business. If one or more of the analysts who covers us downgrades our common stock or publishes inaccurate or unfavorable research about our business, the price of our common stock would likely decline. If one or more of these analysts cease coverage of us or fails to publish reports on us regularly, demand for our common stock could decrease, which could cause the price of our common stock and trading volume to decline.
We have a small public float compared to other larger publicly-traded companies, which may result in price swings in our common stock or make it difficult to acquire or dispose of our common stock.
This small public float can result in large swings in our stock price with relatively low trading volume. In addition, a purchaser that seeks to acquire a significant number of shares may be unable to do so without increasing our common stock price, and conversely, a seller that seeks to dispose of a significant number of shares may experience a decreasing stock price.
Our stock price has been volatile over the past several years and could decline in the future, resulting in losses for our investors.
All the factors discussed in this section, disclosures made in other parts of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, or any other material announcements or events could affect our stock price. In addition, quarterly fluctuations in our operating results, changes in investor and analyst perception of the business risks and conditions of our business, our ability to meet earnings estimates and other performance expectations of financial analysts or investors, unfavorable commentary or downgrades of our stock by research analysts, fluctuations in the stock prices of other toy companies or in stock markets in general, and general economic or political conditions could also cause the price of our stock to change. A significant drop in the price of our stock could expose us to the risk of securities class action lawsuits, which could result in substantial costs and divert management’s attention and resources, adversely affecting our business.
We have a valuation allowance on the deferred taxes on our books since their future realization is uncertain.
Deferred tax assets are realized by prior and future taxable income of appropriate character. Current accounting standards require that a valuation allowance be recorded if it is not likely that sufficient taxable income of appropriate character will be generated to realize the deferred tax assets. We currently believe that based on the available information, it is more likely than not that our deferred tax assets will not be realized, and accordingly we have recorded a valuation allowance against our US federal and state deferred tax assets. Certain of our net operating losses and tax credit carry-forwards can expire if unused, and the utilization of our net operating losses and tax credit carry-forwards could be substantially limited in the event of an "ownership change," as defined in Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, or the Internal Revenue Code.
We have a material amount of goodwill which, if it becomes impaired, would result in a reduction in our net earnings.
Goodwill is the amount by which the cost of an acquisition exceeds the fair value of the net assets we acquire. Goodwill is not amortized and is required to be evaluated for impairment at least annually. At December 31, 2020, $35.1 million, or 10.7%, of our total assets represented goodwill. Declines in our profitability may impact the fair value of our reporting units, which could result in a write-down of our goodwill and consequently harm our results of operations. We did not record any goodwill impairment charges during 2020, 2019 or 2018. In the future, if we do not achieve our profitability and growth targets the carrying value of our goodwill may become further impaired, resulting in additional impairment charges.
Item 2. Properties
The following is a listing of the principal leased offices maintained by us as of March 15, 2021:
Property |
Location |
Approximate Square Feet |
Lease Expiration Date |
US and Canada * |
|||
Distribution Center |
City of Industry, California |
800,000 |
April 30, 2023 |
Disguise Office |
Poway, California |
24,200 |
June 30, 2024 |
Corporate Headquarters/Showroom |
Santa Monica, California |
65,858 |
January 31, 2024 |
International * |
|||
Europe Office |
Bracknell, United Kingdom |
8,957 |
January 19, 2027 |
Hong Kong Headquarters |
Kowloon, Hong Kong |
18,500 |
June 30, 2022 |
* The Halloween segment is included in the properties listed above.
Item 3. Legal Proceedings
For information regarding our legal proceedings, see Item 8 “Consolidated Financial Statements and Supplementary Data Note 22 – Litigation and Contingencies.”
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures
Not applicable.
PART II
Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
Market Information
Our common stock is traded on the Nasdaq Global Select exchange under the symbol “JAKK.”
Security Holders
To the best of our knowledge, as of March 10, 2021, there were 136 holders of record of our common stock. We believe there are numerous beneficial owners of our common stock whose shares are held in “street name.”
Dividends
The payment of dividends on common stock is at the discretion of the Board of Directors and is subject to customary limitations and may be subject to certain restrictions pursuant to the terms of our preferred stock and under our credit facility and term loan. We currently do not anticipate paying any dividends in the foreseeable future.
Compensation Plan Information
The table below sets forth the following information as of the year ended December 31, 2020 for (i) all compensation plans previously approved by our stockholders and (ii) all compensation plans not previously approved by our stockholders, if any:
(a) the number of securities to be issued upon the exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights;
(b) the weighted-average exercise price of such outstanding options, warrants and rights; and
(c) other than securities to be issued upon the exercise of such outstanding options, warrants and rights, the number of securities remaining available for future issuance under the plans.
Plan Category |
Number of Securities to be Issued Upon Exercise of Outstanding Options, Warrants and Rights (a) |
Weighted- Average Exercise Price of Outstanding Options, Warrants and Rights (b) |
Number of Securities Remaining Available for Future Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans, Excluding Securities Reflected in Column (a) (c) |
|||||||||
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders |
— | — | 1,180,266 | |||||||||
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders |
— | — | — | |||||||||
Total |
— | — | 1,180,266 |
Equity compensation plans approved by our stockholders consists of the 2002 Stock Award and Incentive Plan. An additional 1.4 million, 2.5 million, and 3.6 million shares were added to the number of total issuable shares under the Plan and approved by the Board in 2013, 2017, and 2019, respectively. Additionally, 507,867 shares of restricted stock awards remained unvested as of December 31, 2020. Disclosures with respect to equity issuable to certain of our executive officers pursuant to the terms of their employment agreements are disclosed below under Item 11.
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
There were no issuer purchases of equity securities in the fourth quarter of 2020.
Issuer Unregistered Sale of Equity Securities
There were no issuer sales of unregistered equity securities in the fourth quarter of 2020.
Item 6. Selected Financial Data
The following table presents selected financial data that should be read in conjunction with “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” (included in Item 7) and our consolidated financial statements and the related notes (included in Item 8).
Year Ended December 31, |
||||||||||||||||||||
2020 |
2019 |
2018 |
2017 |
2016 |
||||||||||||||||
(In thousands, except per share data) |
||||||||||||||||||||
Consolidated Statements of Operations Data: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Net sales |
$ | 515,872 | $ | 598,649 | $ | 567,810 | $ | 613,111 | $ | 706,603 | ||||||||||
Cost of sales |
366,107 | 439,304 | 412,094 | 457,430 | 483,582 | |||||||||||||||
Gross profit |
149,765 | 159,345 | 155,716 | 155,681 | 223,021 | |||||||||||||||
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
134,860 | 161,210 | 185,142 | 205,223 | 205,915 | |||||||||||||||
Goodwill and other intangibles impairment |
— | 9,379 | — | 13,536 | — | |||||||||||||||
Restructuring charge |
1,631 | 341 | 1,114 | 1,080 | — | |||||||||||||||
Pandemic related charges |
366 | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||
Acquisition related and other |
— | 6,204 | 1,633 | — | — | |||||||||||||||
Income (loss) from operations |
12,908 | (17,789 |
) |
(32,173 |
) |
(64,158 |
) |
17,106 | ||||||||||||
Income from joint ventures |
2 | — | 227 | 105 | 889 | |||||||||||||||
Other income (expense), net |
301 | (1,158 |
) |
152 | 342 | 305 | ||||||||||||||
Loss on extinguishment of debt |
— | (13,205 |
) |
(453 |
) |
(611 |
) |
— | ||||||||||||
Change in fair value of preferred stock derivative liability |
(2,815 |
) |
(353 |
) |
— | — | — | |||||||||||||
Change in fair value of convertible senior notes |
(2,265 |
) |
(5,112 |
) |
2,948 | (308 |
) |
— | ||||||||||||
Write-off of investment in DreamPlay, LLC |
— | — | — | (7,000 |
) |
— | ||||||||||||||
Interest income |
22 | 85 | 68 | 37 | 51 | |||||||||||||||
Interest expense |
(21,562 |
) |
(15,935 |
) |
(10,243 |
) |
(9,829 |
) |
(12,975 |
) |
||||||||||
Income (loss) before provision for income taxes |
(13,409 |
) |
(53,467 |
) |
(39,474 |
) |
(81,422 |
) |
5,376 | |||||||||||
Provision for income taxes |
735 | 1,912 | 2,951 | 1,606 | 4,127 | |||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) |
(14,144 |
) |
(55,379 |
) |
(42,425 |
) |
(83,028 |
) |
1,249 | |||||||||||
Net income (loss) attributable to non-controlling interests |
130 | 169 | (57 |
) |
57 | 6 | ||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) attributable to JAKKS Pacific, Inc. |
$ | (14,274 |
) |
$ | (55,548 |
) |
$ | (42,368 |
) |
$ | (83,085 |
) |
$ | 1,243 | ||||||
Net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders |
$ | (15,531 |
) |
$ | (56,031 |
) |
$ | (42,368 |
) |
$ | (83,085 |
) |
$ | 1,243 | ||||||
Basic earnings (loss) per share |
$ | (4.27 |
) |
$ | (21.57 |
) |
$ | (18.34 |
) |
$ | (38.93 |
) |
$ | 0.75 | ||||||
Diluted earnings (loss) per share |
$ | (4.27 |
) |
$ | (21.57 |
) |
$ | (18.34 |
) |
$ | (38.93 |
) |
$ | 0.75 | ||||||
Dividends declared per common share |
$ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — |
Net sales reported during 2018 through 2020 were recognized under ASC 606 and net sales reported during 2016 and 2017 were recognized under ASC 605.
During the second quarter of 2020, we incurred restructuring charges of $1.6 million as a result of a Company-wide restructuring initiative. During 2020, we recognized a loss of $2.3 million related to changes in the fair value of the 3.25% convertible senior notes due in 2023 and a loss of $2.8 million related to changes in fair value of the preferred stock derivative liability.
During the third quarter of 2019, we recognized a $13.2 million loss related to the extinguishment of debt. During the fourth quarter of 2019, we assessed the recoverability of the Maui product lines and determined that the fair value was less than its carrying amount. As a result, we recorded an intangibles impairment charge of $9.4 million. During 2019, we recognized a $2.5 million loss related to changes in the fair value of the 3.25% convertible senior notes due in 2020, and a loss of $2.6 million related to changes in the fair value of the 3.25% convertible senior notes due in 2023. We also recognized $6.2 million in acquisition related and other charges related to strategic and/or refinancing transactions, including a transaction whereby we entered into, and consummated multiple, binding definitive agreements among Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd. and an ad hoc group of holders of the 4.875% convertible senior notes due 2020 that closed in August 2019. See Note 10 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included within Item 8 for further information.
During the first quarter of 2018, we recorded a charge of $3.5 million related to the write-down of license advances and minimum guarantees that are not expected to be earned through sales of the licensed products. During the third quarter of 2018, we recognized a $0.5 million loss related to the extinguishment of $8.0 million face amount of our 4.25% convertible senior notes due in 2018. During the fourth quarter of 2018, we incurred restructuring charges of $1.1 million as a result of a Company-wide restructuring initiative. During 2018, we recognized a net bad debt write-off of $8.7 million related to the Toys “R” Us bankruptcy filing, $1.6 million in acquisition related and other charges as a result of the Hong Kong Meisheng Cultural Company Limited’s expression of interest in acquiring additional shares of our common stock, and recorded a $2.9 million gain related to the fair market value adjustment for the 3.25% convertible senior notes due in 2020.
During the third quarter of 2017, we recorded impairment charges of $8.3 million to write off goodwill, $2.9 million to write off the remaining unamortized technology rights related to DreamPlay, LLC, and $2.3 million to write down several underutilized trademarks and trade names that were determined to have no value. Additionally, we wrote off our investment in DreamPlay, LLC in the amount of $7.0 million. During the third and fourth quarters of 2017, we recorded a charge of $9.6 million related to the write-down of certain excess and impaired inventory, recognized a bad debt write off of $8.9 million related to the Toys “R” Us bankruptcy filing on September 18, 2017, recorded a charge of $20.5 million related to the write-down of license advances and minimum guarantees that are not expected to be earned through sales of the licensed products and incurred restructuring charges of $1.1 million as a result of a Company-wide restructuring initiative. During the fourth quarter of 2017, we recognized a $0.6 million loss related to the extinguishment of $21.6 million face amount of our 4.25% convertible senior notes due in 2018 and we recognized a $0.3 million loss related to the fair market value adjustment for the 3.25% convertible senior notes due in 2020.
During the second quarter of 2016, we recorded income of $0.7 million related to Pacific Animation Partners and $0.2 million for funds received related to our former video game joint venture, which is included in income (loss) from joint ventures.
At December 31, |
||||||||||||||||||||
2020 |
2019 |
2018 |
2017 |
2016 |
||||||||||||||||
(In thousands) |
||||||||||||||||||||
Consolidated Balance Sheet Data: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 87,953 | $ | 61,613 | $ | 53,282 | $ | 64,977 | $ | 86,064 | ||||||||||
Working capital |
112,562 | 107,461 | 106,041 | 146,911 | 236,569 | |||||||||||||||
Total assets |
329,369 | 365,222 | 342,841 | 370,349 | 464,303 | |||||||||||||||
Short-term debt |
5,950 | 1,905 | 27,211 | 26,075 | 10,000 | |||||||||||||||
Long-term debt |
150,410 | 174,962 | 139,792 | 133,497 | 203,007 | |||||||||||||||
Total stockholders' equity |
12,938 | 4,021 | 51,649 | 94,513 | 135,200 |
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The following Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Our actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a result of various factors. You should read this section in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and the related notes included in Item 8 “Consolidated Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.”
Critical Accounting Policies
The accompanying consolidated financial statements and supplementary information were prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Significant accounting policies are discussed in Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, included within Item 8. Inherent in the application of many of these accounting policies is the need for management to make estimates and judgments in the determination of certain revenues, expenses, assets and liabilities. As such, materially different financial results can occur as circumstances change and additional information becomes known. The policies with the greatest potential effect on our results of operations and financial position include:
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts. Our allowance for doubtful accounts is based upon management’s assessment of the business environment, customers’ financial condition, historical collection experience, accounts receivable aging, customer disputes and the collectability of specific customer accounts. If there were a deterioration of a major customer’s creditworthiness, or actual defaults were higher than our historical experience, our estimates of the recoverability of amounts due to us could be overstated, which could have an adverse impact on our operating results. Our allowance for doubtful accounts is also affected by the time at which uncollectible accounts receivable balances are actually written off.
Major customers’ accounts are monitored on an ongoing basis and more in-depth reviews are performed based upon changes in a customer’s financial condition and/or the level of credit being extended. When a significant event occurs, such as a bankruptcy filing by a specific customer, and on a quarterly basis, the allowance is reviewed for adequacy and the balance or accrual rate is adjusted to reflect current risk prospects. When certain shocks to the market occur, customers are unilaterally reviewed to assess the potential impact of that shock on their financial stability. Many retailers have been operating under financial duress for several years. Ultimately, we assess the risk of liquidation bankruptcy by a customer and the associated likelihood that we will not be paid for product shipped. To that end, it is not only outstanding accounts receivable balances but the decisions to design and develop account-specific product and ultimately ship product on a go-forward basis that plays into our attempts to maximize profitability while minimizing uncollectable accounts receivable.
Revenue Recognition. Our contracts with customers only include one performance obligation (i.e., sale of our products). Revenue is recognized in the gross amount at a point in time when delivery is completed and control of the promised goods is transferred to the customers. Revenue is measured as the amount of consideration we expect to be entitled to in exchange for those goods. Our contracts do not involve financing elements as payment terms with customers are less than one year. Further, because revenue is recognized at the point in time goods are sold to customers, there are no contract assets or contract liability balances.
We disaggregate our revenues from contracts with customers by reporting segment: Toys/Consumer Products and Halloween. We further disaggregate revenues by major geographic regions (see Item 8 "Consolidated Financial Statements and Supplementary Data Note 3 - Business Segments, Geographic Data, and Sales by Major Customers” for further information).
We offer various discounts, pricing concessions, and other allowances to customers, all of which are considered in determining the transaction price. Certain discounts and allowances are fixed and determinable at the time of sale and are recorded at the time of sale as a reduction to revenue. Other discounts and allowances can vary and are determined at management’s discretion (variable consideration). Specifically, we occasionally grant discretionary credits to facilitate markdowns and sales of slow moving merchandise, and consequently accrue an allowance based on historic credits and management estimates. Further, while we generally do not allow product returns, we do make occasional exceptions to this policy, and consequently record a sales return allowance based upon historic return amounts and management estimates. These allowances (variable consideration) are estimated using the expected value method and are recorded at the time of sale as a reduction to revenue. We adjust our estimate of variable consideration at least quarterly or when facts and circumstances used in the estimation process may change. The variable consideration is not constrained as we have sufficient history on the related estimates and do not believe there is a risk of significant revenue reversal.
We also participate in cooperative advertising arrangements with some customers, whereby we allow a discount from invoiced product amounts in exchange for customer purchased advertising that features our products. Generally, these allowances range from 1% to 20% of gross sales, and are generally based upon product purchases or specific advertising campaigns. Such allowances are accrued when the related revenue is recognized. These cooperative advertising arrangements provide a distinct benefit at fair value, and are accounted for as direct selling expenses.
Sales commissions are expensed when incurred as the related revenue is recognized at a point in time and therefore the amortization period is less than one year. As a result, these costs are recorded as direct selling expenses, as incurred.
Shipping and handling activities are considered part of our obligation to transfer the products and therefore are recorded as direct selling expenses, as incurred.
Our reserve for sales returns and allowances amounted to $42.1 million as of December 31, 2020 and $38.4 million as of December 31, 2019.
Fair value measurements. Fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. In determining fair value, we use various methods including market, income and cost approaches. Based upon these approaches, we often utilize certain assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability, including assumptions about risk and/or the risks inherent in the inputs to the valuation technique. These inputs can be readily observable, market-corroborated, or unobservable inputs. We utilize valuation techniques that maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs. Based upon observable inputs used in the valuation techniques, we are required to provide information according to the fair value hierarchy. The fair value hierarchy ranks the quality and reliability of the information used to determine fair values into three broad levels as follows:
Level 1: |
Valuations for assets and liabilities traded in active markets from readily available pricing sources for market transactions involving identical assets or liabilities. |
Level 2: |
Valuations for assets and liabilities traded in less active dealer or broker markets. Valuations are obtained from third-party pricing services for identical or similar assets or liabilities. |
Level 3: |
Valuations incorporate certain assumptions and projections in determining the fair value assigned to such assets or liabilities. |
In instances where the determination of the fair value measurement is based upon inputs from different levels of the fair value hierarchy, the level in the fair value hierarchy within which the entire fair value measurement falls is based upon the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety. Our assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement in its entirety requires judgment, and considers factors specific to the asset or liability (see Item 8 "Consolidated Financial Statements and Supplementary Data Note 16 - Fair Value Measurements” for further information).
Goodwill and other indefinite-lived intangible assets. Goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets are not amortized, but are tested for impairment at least annually at the reporting unit level.
Factors we consider important that could trigger an impairment review include the following:
● |
Significant underperformance relative to expected historical or projected future operating results; |
● |
Significant changes in the manner of our use of the acquired assets or the strategy for our overall business; |
● |
Significant negative industry or economic trends. |
Due to the subjective nature of the impairment analysis, significant changes in the assumptions used to develop the estimate could materially affect the conclusion regarding the future cash flows necessary to support the valuation of long-lived assets, including goodwill. The valuation of goodwill involves a high degree of judgment and uncertainty related to our key assumptions. Any changes in our key projections or estimates could result in a reporting unit either passing or failing the first step of the impairment model, which could significantly change the amount of any impairment ultimately recorded.
Based upon the assumptions underlying the valuation, impairment is determined by estimating the fair value of a reporting unit and comparing that value to the reporting unit’s book value. Goodwill is tested for impairment annually, and on an interim basis if certain events or circumstances indicate that an impairment loss may have been incurred. If the fair value is more than the carrying value of the reporting unit, an impairment loss is not indicated. If a reporting unit's carrying value exceeds its fair value, an impairment charge would be recognized for the excess amount, not to exceed the carrying amount of goodwill.
We performed our annual assessment of goodwill for impairment as of our annual testing date, on April 1, 2020, for each of our reporting units by evaluating qualitative factors, including, but not limited to, the performance of each reporting unit, general economic conditions, access to capital, the industry and competitive environment, and the interest rate environment. Based on our assessment, we determined that the fair values of our reporting units were not less than the carrying amounts. No goodwill impairment was determined to have occurred for the year ended December 31, 2020.
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets. When facts and circumstances indicate that the carrying values of long-lived assets, including buildings, equipment and amortizable intangible assets, may be impaired, we perform an evaluation of recoverability by comparing the carrying values of the net assets to their related projected undiscounted future cash flows, in addition to other quantitative and qualitative analysis. Our estimates are subject to uncertainties and may be impacted by various external factors such as economic conditions and market competition. While we believe the inputs and assumptions utilized in our analysis of future cash flows are reasonable, events or circumstances may change, which could cause us to revise these estimates.
Reserve for Inventory Obsolescence. We value our inventory at the lower of cost or net realizable value. Based upon a consideration of quantities on hand, actual and projected sales volume, anticipated product selling prices and product lines planned to be discontinued, slow-moving and obsolete inventory is written down to its net realizable value.
Failure to accurately predict and respond to consumer demand could result in us under-producing popular items or over-producing less popular items. Furthermore, significant changes in demand for our products would impact management’s estimates in establishing our inventory provision.
Management’s estimates are monitored on a quarterly basis, and a further adjustment to reduce inventory to its net realizable value is recorded as an increase to cost of sales when deemed necessary under the lower of cost or net realizable value standard.
When unexpected shocks to market demand occur, we review whether that shock has materially impacted the value of our owned inventory. In some cases where customers have cancelled orders, accommodation can be reached that the product will be reordered when the customer has restarted operations (in the event of store closures) or the customer agrees to minimize/eliminate requests for product line refreshment (in the event of Halloween order cancellations) which allows the inventory and in some cases raw materials to be held through to the following calendar year without incurring any additional obsolescence.
Income Allocation for Income Taxes. Our annual income tax provision and related income tax assets and liabilities are based upon actual income as allocated to the various tax jurisdictions based upon our transfer pricing study, US and foreign statutory income tax rates and tax regulations and planning opportunities in the various jurisdictions in which we operate. Significant judgment is required in interpreting tax regulations in the U.S. and foreign jurisdictions, and in evaluating worldwide uncertain tax positions. Actual results could differ materially from those judgments, and changes from such judgments could materially affect our consolidated financial statements.
Income taxes and interest and penalties related to income tax payable. We do not file a consolidated return for our foreign subsidiaries. We file federal and state returns and our foreign subsidiaries each file returns in their respective jurisdictions, as applicable. Deferred taxes are provided on an asset and liability method. Deferred tax assets are recognized as deductible temporary differences, operating losses, or tax credit carry-forwards. Deferred tax liabilities are recognized as taxable temporary differences. Temporary differences are the differences between the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and their tax basis. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance when, in the opinion of management, it is more likely than not that some or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are adjusted for the effects of changes in tax laws and rates on the date of enactment.
We must assess the likelihood that we will be able to recover our deferred tax assets. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance, if, based upon the weight of available evidence, it is more likely than not that we will not realize some portion or all of the deferred tax assets. We consider all available positive and negative evidence when assessing whether it is more likely than not that deferred tax assets are recoverable. We consider evidence such as our past operating results, the existence of cumulative losses in previous periods and our forecast of future taxable income. We believe this to be a critical accounting policy because should there be a change in our ability to recover our deferred tax assets, our tax provision would increase in the period in which we determine that the recovery is not likely, as well as decrease in the period in which the assessment of the recoverability of the deferred tax assets reverses, which could have a material impact on our results of operations.
We accrue a tax reserve for additional income taxes and interest, which may become payable in future years as a result of audit adjustments by tax authorities. The reserve is based upon management’s assessment of all relevant information and is periodically reviewed and adjusted as circumstances warrant. As of December 31, 2020, our income tax reserves were approximately $1.0 million and relates to the potential tax settlement in Hong Kong.
We recognize current period interest expense and penalties and the reversal of previously recognized interest expense and penalties that has been determined to not be assessable due to the expiration of the related audit period or other compelling factors on the income tax liability for unrecognized tax benefits as a component of the income tax provision recognized in the consolidated statements of operations.
Share-Based Compensation. We grant restricted stock units and awards to our employees (including officers) and to non-employee directors under our 2002 Stock Award and Incentive Plan (the “Plan”), as amended. The benefits provided under the Plan are share-based payments. We amortize over a requisite service period, the net total deferred stock expense based upon the fair value of the underlying common stock on the date of the grants. In certain instances, the service period may differ from the period in which each award will vest. Additionally, certain groups of grants are subject to performance criteria or an expected forfeiture rate calculation.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements.
See Item 8 "Consolidated Financial Statements and Supplementary Data Note 2 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies.”
Results of Operations
The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, certain statement of operations data as a percentage of net sales.
Year Ended December 31, |
||||||||
2020 |
2019 |
|||||||
Net sales |
100.0 |
% |
100.0 |
% |
||||
Cost of sales |
71.0 | 73.4 | ||||||
Gross profit |
29.0 | 26.6 | ||||||
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
26.1 | 26.9 | ||||||
Intangible asset impairment |
— | 1.6 | ||||||
Restructuring charge |
0.3 | 0.1 | ||||||
Pandemic related charges |
0.1 | — | ||||||
Acquisition related and other |
— | 1.0 | ||||||
Income (loss) from operations |
2.5 | (3.0 |
) |
|||||
Income from joint ventures |
— | — | ||||||
Other income (expense), net |
— | (0.2 |
) |
|||||
Loss on extinguishment of debt |
— | (2.2 |
) |
|||||
Change in fair value of preferred stock derivative liability |
(0.5 |
) |
(0.1 |
) |
||||
Change in fair value of convertible senior notes |
(0.4 |
) |
(0.9 |
) |
||||
Interest income |
— | — | ||||||
Interest expense |
(4.2 |
) |
(2.6 |
) |
||||
Loss before provision for income taxes |
(2.6 |
) |
(9.0 |
) |
||||
Provision for income taxes |
0.2 | 0.3 | ||||||
Net loss |
(2.8 |
) |
(9.3 |
) |
||||
Net income (loss) attributable to non-controlling interests |
— | — | ||||||
Net loss attributable to JAKKS Pacific, Inc. |
(2.8 |
)% |
(9.3 |
)% |
||||
Net loss attributable to common stockholders |
(3.0 |
)% |
(9.4 |
)% |
The following table summarizes, for the periods indicated, certain statement of operations data by segment (in thousands).
Year Ended December 31, |
||||||||
2020 |
2019 |
|||||||
Net Sales |
||||||||
Toys/Consumer Products |
$ | 427,122 | $ | 479,038 | ||||
Halloween |
88,750 | 119,611 | ||||||
515,872 | 598,649 | |||||||
Cost of Sales |
||||||||
Toys/Consumer Products |
294,792 | 344,481 | ||||||
Halloween |
71,315 | 94,823 | ||||||
366,107 | 439,304 | |||||||
Gross Profit |
||||||||
Toys/Consumer Products |
132,330 | 134,557 | ||||||
Halloween |
17,435 | 24,788 | ||||||
$ | 149,765 | $ | 159,345 |
Comparison of the Years Ended December 31, 2020 and 2019
Net Sales
Toys/Consumer Products. Net sales of our Toys/Consumer Products segment were $427.1 million in 2020, compared to $479.0 million in 2019, representing a decrease of $51.9 million, or 10.8%. The decrease in net sales was primarily due to lower sales of Frozen 2, which was launched in 2019. In addition, the Seasonal business was down due to reduced sales of our Morf scooter business and the discontinuation of our Funnoodle pool noodle product line to improve margin.
Halloween. Net sales of our Halloween segment were $88.8 million in 2020, compared to $119.6 million in 2019, representing a decrease of $30.8 million, or 25.8%. The decrease in net sales was primarily driven by the impact of COVID-19 and related social distancing restrictions on the traditional Halloween season.
Cost of Sales
Toys/Consumer Products. Cost of sales of our Toys/Consumer Products segment was $294.8 million, or 69.0% of related net sales in 2020 compared to $344.5 million, or 71.9% of related net sales in 2019 representing a decrease of $49.7 million or 14.4%. The decrease in dollars is due to lower overall sales in 2020. The decrease in percentage of net sales, year-over-year is due to product margin improvement and lower product obsolescence and tooling expenses.
Halloween. Cost of sales of our Halloween segment was $71.3 million, or 80.3% of related net sales for 2020 compared to $94.8 million, or 79.3% of related net sales in 2019 representing a decrease of $23.5 million, or 24.8%. The decrease in dollars is due to lower overall sales in 2020. The increase as a percentage of net sales, year-over-year, is due to a higher overall royalty rate in 2020 slightly offset by lower product obsolescence expenses.
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses
Selling, general and administrative expenses were $134.9 million in 2020 and $161.2 million in 2019, constituting 26.1% and 26.9% of net sales, respectively. Selling, general and administrative expenses decreased from the prior year period primarily driven by lower compensation, in part, due to a Company-wide COVID restructuring initiative, lower travel, and lower direct selling expenses.
Intangible Asset Impairment
Intangible asset impairment was nil in 2020, as compared to $9.4 million in 2019. In 2019, we recorded impairment charges of $9.4 million related to the Maui product lines because its fair value was determined to be less than its carrying amount.
Restructuring Charge
In 2020 and 2019, we recognized $1.6 million and $0.3 million, respectively. The restructuring charges are primarily related to employee severance.
Pandemic Related Charges
In 2020, we recognized $0.4 million in spending directly attributable to making necessary accommodations related to the COVID-19 pandemic.
Acquisition Related and Other
In 2019, we recognized $6.2 million in acquisition related and other charges related to strategic and/or refinancing transactions, including the Recapitalization Transaction closed in August 2019.
Other Income (Expense), net
Other income (expense), net was $0.3 million in 2020, as compared to ($1.2) million in 2019. In 2019, we recognized a $1.2 million loss in other expense primarily related to a Delaware unclaimed property liability settlement.
Interest Expense
Interest expense was $21.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2020, as compared to $15.9 million in the prior year period. In 2020, we booked interest expense of $2.0 million related to our convertible senior notes due in 2020 and 2023, $18.2 million related to our Term Loan, which includes $3.4 million of payment-in-kind interest, and $3.9 million related to amortization of the debt discount and deferred financing fees, and $1.2 million related to our revolving credit facility. In 2019, we booked interest expense of $5.3 million related to our convertible senior notes, and $10.6 million primarily related to our revolving credit and term loan facilities, which includes $1.7 million of payment-in-kind interest, and $1.5 million related to amortization of the debt discount and deferred financing fees.
Provision for Income Taxes
Our income tax expense, which includes federal, state and foreign income taxes and discrete items, was $0.7 million, or an effective tax rate of (5.5%) for 2020. During 2019, the income tax expense was $1.9 million, or an effective tax rate of (3.6%).
The 2020 tax expense of $0.7 million included a discrete tax benefit of ($0.3) million primarily comprised of return to provision and uncertain tax position adjustments. Absent these discrete tax benefits, our effective tax rate for 2020 was (7.7%), primarily due to the various state taxes and taxes on foreign income.
The 2019 tax expense of $1.9 million included a discrete tax expense of $0.2 million primarily comprised of return to provision and uncertain tax position adjustments. Absent these discrete tax expenses, our effective tax rate for 2019 was (3.1%), primarily due to the various state taxes and taxes on foreign income.
We assess the available positive and negative evidence to estimate if sufficient future taxable income will be generated to use the existing deferred tax assets by jurisdiction. Based on our evaluation of all positive and negative evidence, as of December 31, 2020, a valuation allowance of $92.8 million has been recorded against the deferred tax assets that more likely than not will not be realized. The net deferred tax liabilities of $0.1 million consists of the net deferred tax liabilities in the foreign jurisdiction, where we are in a cumulative income position.
Uncertainties that may have a significant impact on net sales and income (loss) from operations
Significant outbreaks of contagious diseases, and other adverse public health developments, could have a material impact on our business operations and operating results. In December 2019, a strain of Novel Coronavirus causing respiratory illness and death emerged in the city of Wuhan in the Hubei province of China. The Chinese government took certain emergency measures to combat the spread of the virus, including extension of the Lunar New Year holiday, implementation of travel bans and closure of factories and businesses. The majority of our materials and products are sourced from suppliers located in China.
In 2020, the Novel Coronavirus was declared a global pandemic by the World Health Organization and has been spreading throughout the world, including the United States, resulting in emergency measures, including travel bans, closure of retail stores, and restrictions on gatherings of more than a maximum number of people. To the extent that these outbreaks are disruptive to local economies and commercial activity, that development creates downward pressure on our ability to make our product line available to consumers or for consumers to purchase our products, even if our products are available. At this time we cannot quantify the extent of the impact this disease will have on our sales, net income and cash flows, but it could be significant.
Quarterly Fluctuations and Seasonality
We have experienced significant quarterly fluctuations in operating results and anticipate these fluctuations in the future. The operating results for any quarter are not necessarily indicative of results for any future period. Our first quarter is typically expected to be the least profitable as a result of lower net sales but substantially similar fixed operating expenses. This is consistent with the performance of many companies in the toy industry.
The following table presents our unaudited quarterly results for the years indicated. The seasonality of our business is reflected in this quarterly presentation.
2020 |
2019 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(unaudited) |
First Quarter |
Second Quarter |
Third Quarter |
Fourth Quarter |
First Quarter |
Second Quarter |
Third Quarter |
Fourth Quarter |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net sales |
$ | 66,557 | $ | 78,758 | $ | 242,290 | $ | 128,267 | $ | 70,826 | $ | 95,182 | $ | 280,130 | $ | 152,511 | ||||||||||||||||
As a % of full year |
12.9 |
% |
15.2 |
% |
47.0 |
% |
24.9 |
% |
11.8 |
% |
15.9 |
% |
46.8 |
% |
25.5 |
% |
||||||||||||||||
Gross profit |
$ | 16,350 | $ | 16,770 | $ | 74,616 | $ | 42,029 | $ | 14,340 | $ | 17,746 | $ | 80,859 | $ | 46,400 | ||||||||||||||||
As a % of full year |
10.9 |
% |
11.2 |
% |
49.8 |
% |
28.1 |
% |
9.0 |
% |
11.1 |
% |
50.8 |
% |
29.1 |
% |
||||||||||||||||
As a % of net sales |
24.6 |
% |
21.3 |
% |
30.8 |
% |
32.8 |
% |
20.2 |
% |
18.6 |
% |
28.9 |
% |
30.4 |
% |
||||||||||||||||
Income (loss) from operations |
$ | (15,986 |
) |
$ | (9,746 |
) |
$ | 37,513 | $ | 1,127 | $ | (24,041 |
) |
$ | (18,649 |
) |
$ | 35,662 | $ | (10,761 |
) |
|||||||||||
As a % of full year |
(123.8 |
)% |
(75.5 |
)% |
290.6 |
% |
8.7 |
% |
135.1 |
% |
104.8 |
% |
(200.4 |
)% |
60.5 |
% |
||||||||||||||||
As a % of net sales |
(24.0 |
)% |
(12.4 |
)% |
15.5 |
% |
0.9 |
% |
(33.9 |
)% |
(19.6 |
)% |
12.7 |
% |
(7.1 |
)% |
||||||||||||||||
Income (loss) before provision for (benefit from) income taxes |
$ | (11,722 |
) |
$ | (22,996 |
) |
$ | 32,164 | $ | (10,855 |
) |
$ | (29,372 |
) |
$ | (21,896 |
) |
$ | 17,430 | $ | (19,629 |
) |
||||||||||
As a % of net sales |
(17.6 |
)% |
(29.2 |
)% |
13.3 |
% |
(8.5 |
)% |
(41.5 |
)% |
(23.0 |
)% |
6.2 |
% |
(12.9 |
)% |
||||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) |
$ | (11,998 |
) |
$ | (23,268 |
) |
$ | 32,431 | $ | (11,309 |
) |
$ | (29,127 |
) |
$ | (22,485 |
) |
$ | 16,414 | $ | (20,181 |
) |
||||||||||
As a % of net sales |
(18.0 |
)% |
(29.5 |
)% |
13.4 |
% |
(8.8 |
)% |
(41.1 |
)% |
(23.6 |
)% |
5.9 |
% |
(13.2 |
)% |
||||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) attributable to non-controlling interests |
$ | 40 | $ | 8 | $ | 49 | $ | 33 | $ | 31 | $ | 57 | $ | (31 |
) |
$ | 112 | |||||||||||||||
As a % of net sales |
0.1 |
% |
— |
% |
— |
% |
— |
% |
— |
% |
0.1 |
% |
— |
% |
0.1 |
% |
||||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) attributable to JAKKS Pacific, Inc. |
$ | (12,038 |
) |
$ | (23,276 |
) |
$ | 32,382 | $ | (11,342 |
) |
$ | (29,158 |
) |
$ | (22,542 |
) |
$ | 16,445 | $ | (20,293 |
) |
||||||||||
As a % of net sales |
(18.1 |
)% |
(29.6 |
)% |
13.4 |
% |
(8.8 |
)% |
(41.2 |
)% |
(23.7 |
)% |
5.9 |
% |
(13.3 |
)% |
||||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders |
$ | (12,345 |
) |
$ | (23,588 |
) |
$ | 32,066 | $ | (11,664 |
) |
$ | (29,158 |
) |
$ | (22,542 |
) |
$ | 16,265 | $ | (20,596 |
) |
||||||||||
As a % of net sales |
(18.5 |
)% |
(29.9 |
)% |
13.2 |
% |
(9.1 |
)% |
(41.2 |
)% |
(23.7 |
)% |
5.8 |
% |
(13.5 |
)% |
||||||||||||||||
Diluted earnings (loss) per share |
$ | (4.09 |
) |
$ | (7.70 |
) |
$ | 3.19 | $ | (2.55 |
) |
$ | (12.38 |
) |
$ | (9.55 |
) |
$ | 5.08 | $ | (6.95 |
) |
||||||||||
Weighted average shares and equivalents outstanding |
3,021 | 3,064 | 9,307 | 4,575 | 2,356 | 2,360 | 6,035 | 2,962 |
Consistent with the seasonality of our business, the first, second and fourth quarters of 2020 and 2019, experienced seasonally low sales which coupled with fixed overhead resulted in significant net losses.
Quarterly and year-to-date computations of income (loss) per share amounts are made independently. Therefore, the sum of the per share amounts for the quarters may not agree with the per share amounts for the year.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
As of December 31, 2020, we had working capital of $112.6 million compared to $107.5 million as of December 31, 2019.
Operating activities provided net cash of $43.6 million in 2020 and $21.8 million in 2019. The increase in net cash provided by operating activities in 2020 was primarily impacted by the net loss, excluding the impact of non-cash charges, and a decrease in accounts receivable, inventory, and prepaid expenses and other assets, partially offset by a decrease in accounts payable. Net cash provided by operating activities in 2019 was primarily impacted by an increase in accounts payable, accrued expenses and reserve for sales returns and allowances. Other than open purchase orders issued in the normal course of business related to shipped product, we have no obligations to purchase inventory from our manufacturers. However, we may incur costs or other losses as a result of not placing orders consistent with our forecasts for product manufactured by our suppliers or manufacturers for a variety of reasons including customer order cancellations or a decline in demand. As part of our strategy to develop and market new products, we have entered into various character and product licenses with royalties/obligations generally ranging from 1% to 25% payable on net sales of such products. As of December 31, 2020, these agreements required future aggregate minimum royalty guarantees of $35.2 million, exclusive of $14.5 million in advances already paid. Of this $35.2 million future minimum royalty guarantee, $32.1 million is due over the next twelve months.
Investing activities used net cash of $8.2 million and $9.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively, and consisted primarily of cash paid for the purchase of molds and tooling used in the manufacture of our products.
Financing activities used net cash of $10.9 million in 2020 and $5.8 million in 2019. The cash used in 2020 primarily consists of the repayment of our term loan facility of $15.1 million and retirement of our 2020 convertible senior notes of $1.9 million, partially offset by the proceeds from the loan under the Paycheck Protection Program (the “PPP Loan”) secured under the Coronavirus Aid Relief and Economic Security Act (the “CARES Act”). The cash used in 2019 primarily consists of the repayment of our GACP term loan of $20.0 million and net payments of $7.5 million, as well as, debt issuance costs incurred in connection with the Recapitalization Transaction (see Item 8 "Consolidated Financial Statements and Supplementary Data Note 10 - Debt”), partially offset by the net proceeds included as a part of our New Term Loan agreement of $27.4 million.
The following is a summary of our significant contractual cash obligations for the periods indicated that existed as of December 31, 2020 and is based upon information appearing in the notes to the consolidated financial statements (in thousands):
2021 |
2022 |
2023 |
2024 |
2025 |
Thereafter |
Total |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Short-term debt |
$ | 5,950 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 5,950 | ||||||||||||||
Long-term debt |
— | 5,256 | 137,683 | — | — | — | 142,939 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Interest on debt |
10,992 | 10,848 | 16,028 |
* |
— | — | — | 37,868 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Operating leases |
11,082 | 10,603 | 6,049 | 590 | 281 | 258 | 28,863 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Minimum guaranteed license/royalty payments |
32,106 | 2,696 | 350 | 20 | — | — | 35,172 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Employment contracts |
5,040 | 2,344 | 2,362 | 2,410 | — | — | 12,156 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Total contractual cash obligations |
$ | 65,170 | $ | 31,747 | $ | 162,472 | $ | 3,020 | $ | 281 | $ | 258 | $ | 262,948 |
* Includes $2.5 million of payment-in-kind interest for the 3.25% convertible senior notes due 2023 and $11.5 million of payment-in-kind interest for the New Term Loan (see Item 8 "Consolidated Financial Statements and Supplementary Data Note 10 - Debt”).
The above table excludes any potential uncertain income tax liabilities that may become payable upon examination of our income tax returns by taxing authorities. Such amounts and periods of payment cannot be reliably estimated (see Item 8 "Consolidated Financial Statements and Supplementary Data Note 13 - Income Taxes” for further explanation of our uncertain tax positions).
As of December 31, 2020, we have $124.5 million (including $4.7 million in payment-in-kind interest) of outstanding indebtedness under a First Lien Term Loan Facility Credit Agreement (the “New Term Loan Agreement”) and we have no outstanding indebtedness under our amended and extended Credit Agreement (the “Amended ABL Credit Agreement” or “Amended Wells Fargo Credit Agreement”) with Wells Fargo Bank, National Association (“Wells Fargo”). We also have a $6.2 million PPP loan under the PPP secured under the CARES Act.
The New Term Loan Agreement and Amended ABL Credit Agreement each contain negative covenants that, subject to certain exceptions, limit our ability, among other things, to incur additional indebtedness, make restricted payments, pledge assets as security, make investments, loans, advances, guarantees and acquisitions, undergo fundamental changes and enter into transactions with affiliates, as well as cross-default provisions. The original terms of the New Term Loan Agreement required us to maintain a trailing 12-month Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization (“EBITDA”) (as defined and adjusted therein) of not less than $34.0 million and a minimum liquidity of not less than $10.0 million commencing with the fiscal quarter ending September 30, 2020.
On October 16, 2020, we reached an agreement (the “Amendment”) with holders of our term loan and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association (“Wells Fargo”), holder of our revolving credit facility, to amend our New Term Loan Agreement and defer the EBITDA covenant calculation until March 31, 2022. Under the Amendment, the trailing 12-month EBITDA requirement was reduced to $25.0 million, which will not be calculated earlier than March 31, 2022. The Amendment also required us to pre-pay $15.0 million of the New Term Loan immediately and, under certain conditions, pre-pay up to an additional $5.0 million no later than the third quarter of fiscal year 2021. In connection with the Amendment on October 20, 2020, we paid $15.0 million of our outstanding principal amount and $0.3 million in related interest and PIK interest.
The New Term Loan Agreement contains events of default that are customary for a facility of this nature, including nonpayment of principal, nonpayment of interest, fees or other amounts, material inaccuracy of representations and warranties, violation of covenants, cross-default to other material indebtedness, bankruptcy or insolvency events, material judgment defaults and a change of control as specified in the New Term Loan Agreement, and cross-default provisions with the Amended Wells Fargo Credit Agreement. If an event of default occurs under either Agreement, the maturity of the amounts owed under the New Term Loan Agreement and the Amended Wells Fargo Credit Agreement may be accelerated.
We were in compliance with the financial covenants under the New Term Loan Agreement as of December 31, 2020.
Debt and Credit Facilities
Convertible Senior Notes
In July 2013, we sold an aggregate of $100.0 million principal amount of 4.25% convertible senior notes due 2018 (the “2018 Notes”). The 2018 Notes, which were senior unsecured obligations, paid interest semi-annually in arrears on August 1 and February 1 of each year at a rate of 4.25% per annum and matured on August 1, 2018. Excluding the impact of the 1 for 10 reverse stock split, the initial conversion rate for the 2018 Notes was 114.3674 shares of our common stock per $1,000 principal amount of notes, equivalent to an initial conversion price of approximately $8.74 per share of common stock, subject to adjustment in certain events. In 2016, we repurchased and retired an aggregate of approximately $6.1 million principal amount of the 2018 Notes. During the first quarter of 2017, we exchanged and retired $39.1 million principal amount of the 2018 Notes at par for $24.1 million in cash and approximately 290,000 shares of our common stock. During the second quarter of 2017, we exchanged and retired $12.0 million principal amount of the 2018 Notes at par for $11.6 million in cash and 11,240 shares of our common stock.
In August 2017, we agreed with Oasis Management and Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd., (collectively, “Oasis”) the holder of approximately $21.6 million face amount of our 2018 Notes, to extend the maturity date of these notes to November 1, 2020. In addition, the interest rate was reduced to 3.25% per annum, and excluding the impact of the 1 for 10 reverse stock split, the conversion rate was increased to 328.0302 shares of our common stock per $1,000 principal amount of notes, among other things. After execution of a definitive agreement for the modification and final approval by the other members of our Board of Directors and Oasis’ Investment Committee, the transaction closed on November 7, 2017. On July 26, 2018, we closed a transaction with Oasis to exchange $8.0 million face amount of the 2018 Notes with convertible senior notes similar to those issued to Oasis in November 2017. The July 26, 2018 $8.0 million Oasis notes mature on November 1, 2020, accrue interest at an annual rate of 3.25%, and excluding the impact of the 1 for 10 reverse stock split, are convertible into shares of our common stock at a rate of 322.2688 shares per $1,000 principal amount of the new notes. The conversion price for the 3.25% convertible senior notes due 2020 was reset on November 1, 2018 and November 1, 2019 (each, a “reset date”) to a price equal to 105% above the 5-day Volume Weighted Average Price ("VWAP") preceding the reset date; provided, however, among other reset restrictions, that if the conversion price resulting from such reset is lower than 90 percent of the average VWAP during the 90 calendar days preceding the reset date, then the reset price shall be the 30-day VWAP preceding the reset date. Excluding the impact of the 1 for 10 reverse stock split, the conversion price of the 3.25% convertible senior notes due 2020 reset on November 1, 2018 to $2.54 per share and the conversion rate was increased to 393.7008 shares of our common stock per $1,000 principal amount of notes.
The remaining $13.2 million of 2018 Notes were redeemed at par at maturity on August 1, 2018.
In August 2019, we entered into and consummated multiple, binding definitive agreements (collectively, the “Recapitalization Transaction”) among Wells Fargo, Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd. and an ad hoc group of holders of the 4.875% convertible senior notes due 2020 ( the "Investor Parties") to recapitalize our balance sheet, including the extension to us of incremental liquidity and at least three-year extensions of substantially all of our outstanding convertible debt obligations and revolving credit facility. Our term loan agreement entered into with Great American Capital Partners (see Item 8 "Consolidated Financial Statements and Supplementary Data Note 11 - Credit Facilities”) was paid in full and terminated in connection with the Recapitalization Transaction.
In connection with the Recapitalization Transaction, we issued (i) amended and restated notes with respect to the $21.6 million Oasis Note issued on November 7, 2017, and the $8.0 million Oasis Note issued on July 26, 2018 (together, the “Existing Oasis Notes”), and (ii) a new $8.0 million convertible senior note having the same terms as such amended and restated notes (the "New $8.0 million Oasis Note" and collectively, the “New Oasis Notes” or the "3.25% convertible senior notes due 2023"). Interest on the New Oasis Notes is payable on each May 1 and November 1 until maturity and accrues at an annual rate of (i) 3.25% if paid in cash or 5.00% if paid in stock plus (ii) 2.75% payable in kind. The New Oasis Notes mature 91 days after the amounts outstanding under the New Term Loan are paid in full, and in no event later than July 3, 2023.
Excluding the impact of the 1 for 10 reverse stock split, the New Oasis Notes provide, among other things, that the initial conversion price is $1.00. The conversion price will be reset on each February 9 and August 9, starting on February 9, 2020 (each, a “reset date”) to a price equal to 105% of the 5-day VWAP preceding the applicable reset date. Under no circumstances shall the reset result in a conversion price be below the greater of (i) the closing price on the trading day immediately preceding the applicable reset date and (ii) 30% of the stock price as of the Transaction Agreement Date, or August 7, 2019, and will not be greater than the conversion price in effect immediately before such reset. We may trigger a mandatory conversion of the New Oasis Notes if the market price exceeds 150% of the conversion price under certain circumstances. We may redeem the New Oasis Notes in cash if a person, entity or group acquires shares of our Common Stock, par value $0.001 per share (the “Common Stock”), and as a result owns at least 49% of our issued and outstanding Common Stock. On February 9, 2020, excluding the impact of the 1 for 10 reverse stock split, the conversion price of the New Oasis Notes reset to $1.00 per share ($10.00 per share after reverse stock split). On August 9, 2020, the conversion price of the New Oasis Notes reset to $5.647. On February 9, 2021, the conversion price of the New Oasis Notes recalculated and remained unchanged at $5.647.
In June 2020, $7.1 million of the New Oasis Notes (including $0.2 million in payment-in-kind interest) were converted for 710,100 shares of common stock. As a result, we recorded an increase to additional paid-in capital of $9.5 million. In August 2020, $1.0 million of the New Oasis Notes (including $27,288 in payment-in-kind interest) were converted for 177,085 shares of common stock. As a result, we recorded an increase to additional paid-in capital of $1.3 million. In October 2020, $2.0 million of the New Oasis Notes (including $63,225 in payment-in-kind interest) were converted for 354,170 shares of common stock. As a result, we recorded an increase to additional paid-in capital of $2.6 million. In November 2020, $4.0 million of the New Oasis Notes (including $138,248 in payment-in-kind interest) were converted for 708,340 shares of common stock. As a result, we recorded an increase to additional paid-in capital of $5.4 million. In December 2020, $1.0 million of the New Oasis Notes (including $36,528 in payment-in-kind interest) were converted for 177,085 shares of common stock. As a result, we recorded an increase to additional paid-in capital of $1.4 million. On March 2, 2021, $1.0 million of the New Oasis Notes (including $42,009 in payment-in-kind interest) were converted for 177,085 shares of common stock. On March 9, 2021, $1.0 million of the New Oasis Notes (including $42,516 in payment-in-kind interest) were converted for 177,085 shares of common stock.
On February 5, 2021, Benefit Street Partners and Oasis Investment II Master Funds Ltd, both related parties, entered into a purchase and sale agreement wherein Benefit Street Partners purchased $11.0 million of principal amount, plus all accrued and unpaid interest thereon, of the New Oasis Notes from Oasis Investment II Master Funds Ltd (see Item 8 "Consolidated Financial Statements and Supplementary Data Note 12 – Related Party Transactions”). The transaction closed on February 8, 2021 (see Item 8 "Consolidated Financial Statements and Supplementary Data Note 10 – Debt”).
In June 2014, we sold an aggregate of $115.0 million principal amount of 4.875% convertible senior notes due 2020 (the “2020 Notes”). The 2020 Notes are senior unsecured obligations paying interest semi-annually in arrears on June 1 and December 1 of each year at a rate of 4.875% per annum and will mature on June 1, 2020. Excluding the impact of the 1 for 10 reverse stock split, the initial and still current conversion rate for the 2020 Notes is 103.7613 shares of our common stock per $1,000 principal amount of notes, equivalent to an initial conversion price of approximately $9.64 per share of common stock, subject to adjustment in certain events. Upon conversion, the 2020 Notes will be settled in shares of our common stock. Holders of the 2020 Notes may require that we repurchase for cash all or some of their notes upon the occurrence of a fundamental change (as defined in the 2020 Notes). In January 2016, we repurchased and retired an aggregate of $2.0 million principal amount of the 2020 Notes.
In connection with the Recapitalization Transaction, the 2020 Notes with a face amount of $111.1 million of the total $113.0 million that were outstanding at the time of the Recapitalization Transaction were refinanced and the maturity dates were extended. Of the refinanced amount, $103.8 million was refinanced with the Investor Parties through the issuance of the New Common Equity, the New Preferred Equity (see Item 8 "Consolidated Financial Statements and Supplementary Data Note 15 - Common Stock and Preferred Stock”) and new secured term debt that matures in February 2023 (see Term Loan section below). Additionally, $1.0 million of accrued interest was refinanced with the Investor Parties. The remaining refinanced amount of $7.3 million was exchanged into the new $8.0 million Oasis Note discussed above.
The remaining $1.9 million principal amount of the 2020 Notes were redeemed at par at maturity on June 1, 2020.
Term Loan
On August 9, 2019, in connection with the Recapitalization Transaction, we entered into a First Lien Term Loan Facility Credit Agreement, (the “New Term Loan Agreement”), with certain holders of the 2020 Notes, or the Investor Parties, and Cortland Capital Market Services LLC, as agent, for a $134.8 million first-lien secured term loan (the “New Term Loan”). We also issued common stock and preferred stock (see Item 8 "Consolidated Financial Statements and Supplementary Data Note 15 - Common Stock and Preferred Stock”) to the Investor Parties.
Amounts outstanding under the New Term Loan accrue interest at 10.50% per annum, payable semi-annually (with 8% per annum payable in cash and 2.5% per annum payable in kind). The New Term Loan matures on February 9, 2023.
The New Term Loan Agreement contains negative covenants that, subject to certain exceptions, limit our ability, and the ability of our subsidiaries to, among other things, incur additional indebtedness, make restricted payments, pledge assets as security, make investments, loans, advances, guarantees and acquisitions, undergo fundamental changes and enter into transactions with affiliates. The original terms of the New Term Loan Agreement required us to maintain a trailing 12-month EBITDA (as defined and adjusted therein) of not less than $34.0 million and a minimum liquidity of not less than $10.0 million commencing with the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2020.
On October 16, 2020, we reached an agreement (the “Amendment”) with holders of our New Term Loan and Wells Fargo, holder of our revolving credit facility, to amend our New Term Loan Agreement and defer our EBITDA covenant calculation until March 31, 2022. Under the Amendment, the trailing 12-month EBITDA requirement was reduced to $25.0 million, which will not be calculated earlier than March 31, 2022. The Amendment also required us to pre-pay $15.0 million of the New Term Loan immediately and, under certain conditions, pre-pay up to an additional $5.0 million no later than the third quarter of fiscal year 2021. As a result, we reclassified $20.0 million from long term debt to short term debt as of September 30, 2020. In connection with the amendment on October 20, 2020, we paid $15.0 million of our outstanding principal amount and $0.3 million in related interest and PIK interest. As of December 31, 2020, we had $124.5 million (including $4.7 million in payment-in-kind interest) outstanding under the New Term Loan Agreement, $5.0 million of which is recorded as short term debt, and $114.8 million is recorded as long term debt in the consolidated balance sheet.
The New Term Loan Agreement contains events of default that are customary for a facility of this nature, including nonpayment of principal, nonpayment of interest, fees or other amounts, material inaccuracy of representations and warranties, violation of covenants, cross-default to other material indebtedness, bankruptcy or insolvency events, material judgment defaults and a change of control as specified in the New Term Loan Agreement. If an event of default occurs, the maturity of the amounts owed under the New Term Loan Agreement may be accelerated.
The obligations under the New Term Loan Agreement are guaranteed by us, the subsidiary borrowers thereunder and certain of the other existing and future direct and indirect subsidiaries and are secured by substantially all of our assets, the subsidiary borrowers thereunder and such other subsidiary guarantors, in each case, subject to certain exceptions and permitted liens.
Loan under Paycheck Protection Program
On June 12, 2020, we received a $6.2 million PPP Loan under the PPP within the CARES Act. The PPP Loan matures on June 2, 2022 and is subject to the CARES Act terms which include, among other terms, an interest rate of 1.00% per annum and monthly installment payments of $261,275 commencing on September 27, 2021. The PPP Loan may be prepaid at any time prior to maturity with no prepayment penalties. The PPP Loan is subject to events of default and other provisions customary for a loan of this type. The PPP Loan may be forgiven, partially or in full, if certain conditions are met, principally based on having been disbursed for permissible purposes and maintaining certain average levels of employment and payroll as required by the CARES Act. The loan received has been recorded as a liability by the Company as of the date received. We intend to apply for forgiveness of amounts received under the PPP, in accordance with the requirements of the CARES Act, as amended. Any loan amounts forgiven will be removed from liabilities recorded. While we used the proceeds of the PPP Loan only for permissible purposes, there can be no assurance that we will be eligible for forgiveness of the PPP Loan, in full or in part.
Wells Fargo
In March 2014, we and our domestic subsidiaries entered into a secured credit facility with General Electric Capital Corporation (“GECC”). The credit facility, as amended and subsequently assigned to Wells Fargo pursuant to its acquisition of GECC, provides for a $75.0 million revolving credit facility subject to availability based on prescribed advance rates on certain domestic accounts receivable and inventory amounts used to compute the borrowing base (the “Credit Facility”). The Credit Facility includes a sub-limit of up to $35.0 million for the issuance of letters of credit. The amounts outstanding under the Credit Facility, as amended, were payable in full upon maturity of the facility on September 27, 2019, except that the Credit Facility would mature on June 15, 2018 if we did not refinance or extend the maturity of the convertible senior notes that mature in 2018, provided that any such refinancing or extension shall have a maturity date that is no sooner than six months after the stated maturity of the Credit Facility (i.e., on or about September 27, 2019). On June 14, 2018, we entered into a Term Loan Agreement with Great American Capital Partners to provide the necessary capital to refinance the 2018 convertible senior notes (see additional details regarding the Term Loan Agreement below). In addition, on June 14, 2018, we revised certain of the Credit Facility documents (and entered into new ones) so that certain of our Hong Kong based subsidiaries became additional parties to the Credit Facility. As a result, the receivables of these subsidiaries can now be included in the borrowing base computation, subject to certain limitations, thereby effectively increasing the amount of funds we can borrow under the Credit Facility. Any additional borrowings under the Credit Facility will be used for general working capital purposes. In August 2019, in connection with the Recapitalization Transaction (see Item 8 "Financial Statements and Supplementary Data Note 10 - Debt”), we entered into an amended and extended revolving credit facility with Wells Fargo (the “Amended ABL Credit Agreement”). The Amended ABL Credit Agreement, or Amended ABL facility, amends and restates our existing Credit Facility, dated as of March 27, 2014, as amended, with GECC and subsequently assigned to Wells Fargo, to, among other things, decrease the borrowing capacity from $75.0 million to $60.0 million and extend the maturity to August 9, 2022.
The obligations under the Amended ABL Credit Agreement are guaranteed by us, the subsidiary borrowers thereunder and certain of the other existing and future direct and indirect subsidiaries and are secured by substantially all of our assets, the subsidiary borrowers thereunder and such other subsidiary guarantors, in each case, subject to certain exceptions and permitted liens. As of December 31, 2020, the amount of outstanding borrowings was nil, the amount of outstanding stand-by letters of credit totaled $10.8 million and the total excess borrowing capacity was $37.3 million. As of December 31, 2019, the amount of outstanding borrowings was nil, the amount of outstanding stand-by letters of credit totaled $9.2 million and the total excess borrowing capacity was $38.4 million.
The Amended ABL Credit Agreement contains negative covenants that, subject to certain exceptions, limit our ability to, among other things, incur additional indebtedness, make restricted payments, pledge our assets as security, make investments, loans, advances, guarantees and acquisitions, undergo fundamental changes and enter into transactions with affiliates. We are also required to maintain a fixed charge coverage ratio of not less than 1.1 to 1.0 under certain circumstances, and a minimum liquidity of $25.0 million and a minimum availability of at least $9.0 million. As of December 31, 2020 and 2019, we are in compliance with the financial covenants under the Amended ABL Facility and the previous Credit Facility, as applicable.
Any amounts borrowed under the Amended ABL Facility accrue interest, at either (i) LIBOR plus 1.50%-2.00% (determined by reference to a fixed charge coverage ratio-based pricing grid) or (ii) base rate plus 0.50%-1.00% (determined by reference to a fixed charge coverage ratio-based pricing grid). As of December 31, 2020 and 2019, the weighted average interest rate on the credit facilities with Wells Fargo was nil and 4.53%, respectively.
The Amended ABL Facility also contains customary events of default, including a cross default provision and a change of control provision. In the event of a default, all of our obligations and our subsidiaries obligations under the Amended ABL Facility may be declared immediately due and payable. For certain events of default relating to insolvency, all outstanding obligations become due and payable.
As described in the aforementioned Term Loan section, on October 16, 2020, we amended the New Term Loan Agreement to reduce the amount and defer the calculation of our EBITDA covenant, with Wells Fargo as party to the agreement.
Great American Capital Partners
On June 14, 2018, we entered into a Term Loan Agreement, Term Note, Guaranty and Security Agreement and other ancillary documents and agreements (the “Term Loan”) with Great American Capital Partners Finance Co., LLC (“GACP”), for itself as a Lender (as defined below) and as the agent (in such capacity, “Agent”) for the Lenders from time to time party to the Term Loan (collectively, “Lenders”) and the other “Secured Parties” under and as defined therein, with respect to the issuance to us by Lenders of a $20.0 million term loan. To secure our obligations under the Term Loan, we granted to Agent, for the benefit of the Secured Parties, a security interest in a substantial amount of our consolidated assets and a pledge of the majority of the capital stock of various of our subsidiaries. The Term Loan was a secured obligation, second only to the Credit Facility with Wells Fargo, except with respect to certain of our inventory in which GACP has a priority secured position.
The Term Loan required the repayment of principal in the amount of 10% of the outstanding Term Loan per year (payable monthly) beginning after the first anniversary. All then-outstanding borrowings under the Term Loan would be due, and the Term Loan would terminate, no later than June 14, 2021, unless sooner terminated in accordance with its terms, which included the date of termination of the Wells Fargo Credit Facility and the date that is 91 days prior to the maturity of our various convertible senior notes due in 2020 (see Item 8 "Financial Statements and Supplementary Data Note 10 - Debt”). We were permitted to prepay the Term Loan, which would have required a prepayment fee (i) in year one of up to any unearned and unpaid interest that would have become due and payable in year one had the prepayment not occurred plus 2% of the initial amount of the Term Loan (i.e., $20.0 million), (ii) in year two of 2% of the initial amount of the Term Loan and (iii) in year three of 1% of the initial amount of the Term Loan.
In August 2019, in connection with the Recapitalization Transaction (see Item 8 "Consolidated Financial Statements and Supplementary Data Note 10 - Debt”), we repaid in full and terminated the Term Loan Agreement.
We are subject to negative covenants which, during the life of the Credit Facility and New Term Loan, prohibit and/or limit us from, among other things, incurring certain types of other debt, acquiring other companies, making certain expenditures or investments, and changing the character of our business. An outbreak of infectious disease, a pandemic or a similar public health threat, such as the 2019 Novel Coronavirus outbreak (discussed above), or a fear of any of the foregoing, could adversely impact our ability to comply with such covenants. Our failure to comply with such covenants or any other breach of the Credit Line or New Term Loan agreement could cause a default and we may then be required to repay borrowings under our Credit Line or New Term Loan with capital from other sources, or reach some other accommodation with those parties.
As of December 31, 2020 and 2019, we held cash and cash equivalents, including restricted cash, of $92.7 million and $66.3 million, respectively. Cash, and cash equivalents, including restricted cash held outside of the United States in various foreign subsidiaries totaled $48.7 million and $27.0 million as of December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively. The cash and cash equivalents, including restricted cash balances in our foreign subsidiaries have either been fully taxed in the U.S. or tax has been accounted for in connection with the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, or may be eligible for a full foreign dividends received deduction under such Act, and thus would not be subject to additional U.S. tax should such amounts be repatriated in the form of dividends or deemed distributions. Any such repatriation may result in foreign withholding taxes, which we expect would not be significant as of December 31, 2020.
Our primary sources of working capital are cash flows from operations and borrowings under our credit facility (see Item 8 "Consolidated Financial Statements and Supplementary Data Note 11 - Credit Facilities”).
Typically, cash flows from operations are impacted by the effect on sales of (1) the appeal of our products, (2) the success of our licensed brands in motivating consumer purchase of related merchandise, (3) the highly competitive conditions existing in the toy industry and in securing commercially attractive licenses, (4) dependency on a limited set of large customers, and (5) general economic conditions. A downturn in any single factor or a combination of factors could have a material adverse impact upon our ability to generate sufficient cash flows to operate the business. In addition, our business and liquidity are dependent to a significant degree on our vendors and their financial health, as well as the ability to accurately forecast the demand for products. The loss of a key vendor, or material changes in support by them, or a significant variance in actual demand compared to the forecast, can have a material adverse impact on our cash flows and business. Given the conditions in the toy industry environment in general, vendors, including licensors, may seek further assurances or take actions to protect against non-payment of amounts due to them. Changes in this area could have a material adverse impact on our liquidity.
As of December 31, 2020, off-balance sheet arrangements include letters of credit issued by Wells Fargo of $10.8 million.
During the last three fiscal years ending December 31, 2020, we do not believe that inflation has had a material impact on our net sales and on income from continuing operations.
Exchange Rates
Sales from our United States and Hong Kong operations are denominated in U.S. dollars and our manufacturing costs are denominated in either U.S. or Hong Kong dollars. Local sales (other than in Hong Kong) and operating expenses of our operations in Hong Kong, the United Kingdom, Germany, Netherlands, France, Canada, Mexico and China are denominated in local currency, thereby creating exposure to changes in exchange rates. Changes in the various exchange rates against the U.S. dollar may positively or negatively affect our operating results. The exchange rate of the Hong Kong dollar to the U.S. dollar has been linked to the U.S. dollar by the Hong Kong Monetary Authority at HK$7.75 - HK$7.85 to US$1.00 since 2005 and, accordingly, has not represented a currency exchange risk to the U.S. dollar. We cannot assure you that the exchange rate between the United States and Hong Kong currencies will continue to be fixed or that exchange rate fluctuations between the United States and Hong Kong or all other currencies will not have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations.
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Market risk represents the risk of loss that may impact our financial position, results of operations or cash flows due to adverse changes in financial and commodity market prices and rates. We are exposed to market risk in the areas of changes in United States and international borrowing rates and changes in foreign currency exchange rates. In addition, we are exposed to market risk in certain geographic areas that have experienced or remain vulnerable to an economic downturn, such as China. We purchase substantially all of our inventory from companies in China, and, therefore, we are subject to the risk that such suppliers will be unable to provide inventory at competitive prices. While we believe that, should such events occur we would be able to find alternative sources of inventory at competitive prices, we cannot assure you that we would be able to do so. These exposures are directly related to our normal operating and funding activities. To date, we have not used derivative instruments or engaged in hedging activities to minimize our market risk.
Interest Rate Risk
As of December 31, 2020, we have outstanding convertible senior notes payable of $23.8 million (including $0.9 million in payment-in-kind interest) principal amount due July 2023 with a fixed interest rate of (i) 3.25% per annum if paid in cash or 5.00% per annum if paid in stock plus (ii) 2.75% per annum payable in kind, as well as a $124.5 million (including $4.7 million in payment-in-kind interest) New Term Loan due February 2023 with a fixed interest rate of (i) 8.00% per annum plus (ii) 2.5% per annum payable in kind. As the interest rates on the notes and the term loan are at fixed rates, we are not generally subject to any direct risk of loss related to these notes arising from changes in interest rates.
Our exposure to market risk includes interest rate fluctuations in connection with our revolving credit facility (see Item 8 "Consolidated Financial Statements and Supplementary Data Note 11 - Credit Facilities”). Borrowings under the revolving credit facility bear interest at either (i) LIBOR plus 1.50%-2.00% (determined by reference to a fixed charge coverage ratio-based pricing grid) or (ii) base rate plus 0.50%-1.00% (determined by reference to a fixed charge coverage ratio-based pricing grid). Borrowings under the revolving credit facility are therefore subject to risk based upon prevailing market interest rates. Interest rate risk may result from many factors, including governmental monetary and tax policies, domestic and international economic and political considerations and other factors that are beyond our control. During the year ended December 31, 2020, the maximum amount borrowed under the revolving credit facility was nil and the average amount of borrowings outstanding was nil. As of December 31, 2020, the amount of total borrowings outstanding under the revolving credit facility was nil.
Foreign Currency Risk
We have wholly-owned subsidiaries in Hong Kong, China, the United Kingdom, Germany, France, Netherlands, Canada and Mexico. Sales are generally made by these operations on FOB China or Hong Kong terms and are denominated in U.S. dollars. However, purchases of inventory and Hong Kong operating expenses are typically denominated in Hong Kong dollars and local operating expenses in the United Kingdom, Germany, France, Netherlands, Canada, Mexico and China are denominated in local currency, thereby creating exposure to changes in exchange rates. Changes in the U.S. dollar exchange rates may positively or negatively affect our gross margins, operating income and retained earnings. The exchange rate of the Hong Kong dollar to the U.S. dollar has been fixed by the Hong Kong government since 1983 at HK$7.80 to US$1.00 and, accordingly, has not represented a currency exchange risk to the U.S. dollar. We do not believe that near-term changes in these exchange rates, if any, will result in a material effect on our future earnings, fair values or cash flows. Therefore, we have chosen not to enter into foreign currency hedging transactions. We cannot assure you that this approach will be successful, especially in the event of a significant and sudden change in the value of these foreign currencies.
Item 8. Consolidated Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Shareholders and Board of Directors
JAKKS Pacific, Inc.
Santa Monica, California
Opinion on the Consolidated Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of JAKKS Pacific, Inc. (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2020 and 2019, the related consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2020, and the related notes and financial statement schedule listed in the accompanying index (collectively referred to as the “consolidated financial statements”). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company at December 31, 2020 and 2019, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2020, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
Change in Accounting Method Related to Leases
As discussed in Note 14 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company has changed its method of accounting for leases during the year ended December 31, 2019 due to the adoption of Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 842, Leases.
Basis for Opinion
These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s consolidated financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (“PCAOB”) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. As part of our audits we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.
Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Critical Audit Matter
The critical audit matter communicated below is a matter arising from the current period audit of the consolidated financial statements that was communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that: (1) relate to accounts or disclosures that are material to the consolidated financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the consolidated financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matter below, providing separate opinions on the critical audit matter or on the accounts or disclosures to which they relate.
Going Concern
As described in Notes 1 and 11 of the Company’s consolidated financial statements, the Company’s primary sources of working capital are cash flows from operations and borrowings under its credit facility. The Company’s cash flows from operations are primarily impacted by the Company’s sales, which are seasonal, and any change in timing or amount of sales may impact the Company’s operating cash flows. The Company owes $124.5 million on its term loan and has borrowing capacity under its credit facility of $37.3 million as of December 31, 2020. During 2020, the Company reached an agreement with its holders of its term loan and the holder of its revolving credit facility, to amend the New Term Loan Agreement and defer the Company’s EBITDA covenant requirement until March 31, 2022 and reduced the trailing 12-month EBITDA requirement to $25.0 million. Based on the Company’s operating plan, management believes that the current working capital combined with expected operating and financing cashflows to be sufficient to fund the Company’s operations and satisfy the Company’s obligations as they come due for at least one year from the financial statement issuance date.
We identified management’s assessment of the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern as a critical audit matter. The going concern assessment requires management judgment to critically evaluate its forecasts and liquidity projections, incorporating the significant and unusual impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic. Auditing management’s going concern assessment involved especially challenging auditor judgment and audit effort due to the nature and extent of effort required to address these matters.
The primary procedure we performed to address this critical audit matter included:
● |
Evaluating the reasonableness of management’s revised forecasts and liquidity projections, which included: (i) obtaining an understanding of management’s process for developing cashflow forecasts, (ii) comparing prior period forecasts to actual results, and (iii) assessing the Company’s ability to meet its trailing twelve months EBITDA covenant for the twelve months from the date of issuance. |
● |
Assessing management’s projections in the context of other audit evidence obtained during the audit and historical performance to determine whether it was contradictory to the conclusion reached by management. |
(Signed BDO USA, LLP)
We have served as the Company's auditor since 2006.
Los Angeles, California
March 19, 2021
JAKKS PACIFIC, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
Assets |
December 31, |
|||||||
2020 |
2019 |
|||||||
(In thousands, except per share data) |
||||||||
Current assets |
||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | $ | ||||||
Restricted cash |
||||||||
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $ |
||||||||
Inventory |
||||||||
Prepaid expenses and other assets |
||||||||
Total current assets |
||||||||
Property and equipment |
||||||||
Office furniture and equipment |
||||||||
Molds and tooling |
||||||||
Leasehold improvements |
||||||||
Total |
||||||||
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization |
||||||||
Property and equipment, net |
||||||||
Operating lease right-of-use assets, net |
||||||||
Other long term assets |
||||||||
Intangible assets, net |
||||||||
Goodwill |
||||||||
Trademarks |
||||||||
Total assets |
$ | $ | ||||||
Liabilities, Preferred Stock and Stockholders' Equity |
||||||||
Current liabilities |
||||||||
Accounts payable |
$ | $ | ||||||
Accrued expenses |
||||||||
Reserve for sales returns and allowances |
||||||||
Income taxes payable |
||||||||
Short term operating lease liabilities |
||||||||
Short term debt, net |
||||||||
Total current liabilities |
||||||||
Long term operating lease liabilities |
||||||||
Debt, non-current portion, net of issuance costs and debt discounts |
||||||||
Other liabilities |
||||||||
Income taxes payable |
||||||||
Deferred income taxes, net |
||||||||
Total liabilities |
||||||||
Preferred stock, $ |
||||||||
Stockholders' Equity* |
||||||||
Common stock, $ |
||||||||
Additional paid-in capital * |
||||||||
Accumulated deficit |
( |
) |
( |
) |
||||
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
( |
) |
( |
) |
||||
Total JAKKS Pacific, Inc. stockholders' equity* |
||||||||
Non-controlling interests |
||||||||
Total stockholders' equity* |
||||||||
Total liabilities, preferred stock and stockholders' equity |
$ | $ |
*
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
JAKKS PACIFIC, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
Year Ended December 31, |
||||||||||||
2020 |
2019 |
2018 |
||||||||||
(In thousands, except per share amounts) |
||||||||||||
Net sales |
$ | $ | $ | |||||||||
Cost of sales |
||||||||||||
Gross profit |
||||||||||||
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
||||||||||||
Intangible asset impairment |
||||||||||||
Restructuring charge |
||||||||||||
Pandemic related charges |
||||||||||||
Acquisition related and other |
||||||||||||
Income (loss) from operations |
( |
) |
( |
) |
||||||||
Income from joint ventures |
||||||||||||
Other income (expense), net |
( |
) |
||||||||||
Loss on extinguishment of debt |
( |
) |
( |
) |
||||||||
Change in fair value of preferred stock derivative liability |
( |
) |
( |
) |
||||||||
Change in fair value of convertible senior notes |
( |
) |
( |
) |
||||||||
Interest income |
||||||||||||
Interest expense |
( |
) |
( |
) |
( |
) |
||||||
Loss before provision for income taxes |
( |
) |
( |
) |
( |
) |
||||||
Provision for income taxes |
||||||||||||
Net loss |
( |
) |
( |
) |
( |
) |
||||||
Net income (loss) attributable to non-controlling interests |
( |
) |
||||||||||
Net loss attributable to JAKKS Pacific, Inc. |
$ | ( |
) |
$ | ( |
) |
$ | ( |
) |
|||
Net loss attributable to common stockholders |
$ | ( |
) |
$ | ( |
) |
$ | ( |
) |
|||
Loss per share - basic and diluted* |
$ | ( |
) |
$ | ( |
) |
$ | ( |
) |
|||
Shares used in loss per share - basic and diluted* |
* After giving effect to a 1 for 10 reverse stock split effective July 9, 2020.
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
JAKKS PACIFIC, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE LOSS
Year Ended December 31, |
||||||||||||
2020 |
2019 |
2018 |
||||||||||
(In thousands) |
||||||||||||
Net loss |
$ | ( |
) |
$ | ( |
) |
$ | ( |
) |
|||
Other comprehensive income (loss): |
||||||||||||
Foreign currency translation adjustment |
( |
) |
||||||||||
Comprehensive loss |
( |
) |
( |
) |
( |
) |
||||||
Less: Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to non-controlling interests |
( |
) |
||||||||||
Comprehensive loss attributable to JAKKS Pacific, Inc. |
$ | ( |
) |
$ | ( |
) |
$ | ( |
) |
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
JAKKS PACIFIC, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Common Stock | Additional |
Accumulated Other |
JAKKS Pacific, Inc. |
Non- | Total | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Number of Shares * |
Amount * |
Treasury Stock |
Paid-in Capital * |
Accumulated Deficit |
Comprehensive Loss |
Stockholders’ Equity * |
Controlling Interests |
Stockholders’ Equity * |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
In Thousands | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance, December 31, 2017 |
$ | $ | ( |
) |
$ | $ | ( |
) |
$ | ( |
) |
$ | $ | $ | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock-based compensation expense |
— | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Repurchase of common stock for employee tax withholding |
( |
) |
— | — | ( |
) |
— | — | ( |
) |
— | ( |
) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Net loss |
— | — | — | — | ( |
) |
— | ( |
) |
( |
) |
( |
) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Foreign currency translation adjustment |
— | — | — | — | — | ( |
) |
( |
) |
— | ( |
) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance, December 31, 2018 |
( |
) |
( |
) |
( |
) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock-based compensation expense |
— | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Common stock issuance |
— | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Treasury shares retirement |
( |
) |
— | ( |
) |
— | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Retirement of restricted stock |
( |
) |
— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Repurchase of common stock for employee tax withholding |
( |
) |
— | — | ( |
) |
— | — | ( |
) |
— | ( |
) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Preferred stock accrued dividends |
— | — | — | ( |
) |
— | — | ( |
) |
— | ( |
) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) |
— | — | — | — | ( |
) |
— | ( |
) |
( |
) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Foreign currency translation adjustment |
— | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance, December 31, 2019 |
— | ( |
) |
( |
) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock-based compensation expense |
— | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Conversion of convertible senior notes |
— | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Repurchase of common stock for employee tax withholding |
( |
) |
— | — | ( |
) |
— | — | ( |
) |
— | ( |
) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Preferred stock accrued dividends |
— | — | — | ( |
) |
— | — | ( |
) |
— | ( |
) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) |
— | — | — | — | ( |
) |
— | ( |
) |
( |
) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Foreign currency translation adjustment |
— | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Adjustment to additional paid in capital |
— | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance, December 31, 2020 |
$ | $ | — | $ | $ | ( |
) |
$ | ( |
) |
$ | $ | $ |
*
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
JAKKS PACIFIC, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
Year Ended December 31, |
||||||||||||
2020 |
2019 |
2018 |
||||||||||
(In thousands) |
||||||||||||
Cash flows from operating activities |
||||||||||||
Net loss |
$ | ( |
) |
$ | ( |
) |
$ | ( |
) |
|||
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities: |
||||||||||||
Provision for doubtful accounts |
||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
||||||||||||
Write-off and amortization of debt issuance costs |
||||||||||||
Share-based compensation expense |
||||||||||||
Payment-in-kind interest |
||||||||||||
Amortization of debt discount |
||||||||||||
(Gain) loss on disposal of property and equipment |
( |
) |
( |
) |
||||||||
Tools and molds disposal |
||||||||||||
Intangibles impairment |
||||||||||||
Loss on extinguishment of debt |
||||||||||||
Deferred income taxes |
( |
) |
( |
) |
||||||||
Change in fair value of convertible senior notes |
( |
) |
||||||||||
Change in fair value of preferred stock derivative liability |
||||||||||||
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: |
||||||||||||
Accounts receivable |
||||||||||||
Inventory |
( |
) |
||||||||||
Prepaid expenses and other assets |
( |
) |
( |
) |
||||||||
Accounts payable |
( |
) |
||||||||||
Accrued expenses |
( |
) |
( |
) |
||||||||
Reserve for sales returns and allowances |
||||||||||||
Income taxes payable |
( |
) |
||||||||||
Other liabilities |
( |
) |
( |
) |
||||||||
Total adjustments |
||||||||||||
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities |
( |
) |
||||||||||
Cash flows from investing activities |
||||||||||||
Purchases of property and equipment |
( |
) |
( |
) |
( |
) |
||||||
Proceeds from sale of property and equipment |
||||||||||||
Net cash used in investing activities |
( |
) |
( |
) |
( |
) |
||||||
Cash flows from financing activities |
||||||||||||
Repurchase of common stock for employee tax withholding |
( |
) |
( |
) |
( |
) |
||||||
Proceeds from loan under the Paycheck Protection Program |
||||||||||||
Net proceeds from credit facility borrowings |
||||||||||||
Retirement of convertible senior notes |
( |
) |
( |
) |
||||||||
Repayment of credit facility borrowings |
( |
) |
( |
) |
||||||||
Debt issuance costs |
( |
) |
( |
) |
||||||||
Proceeds from term loan facility |
||||||||||||
Repayment of term loan facility |
( |
) |
( |
) |
||||||||
Term loan prepayment penalty |
( |
) |
||||||||||
Net proceeds from issuance of long term debt |
||||||||||||
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities |
( |
) |
( |
) |
||||||||
Net increase (decrease) in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash |
( |
) |
||||||||||
Effect of foreign currency translation |
( |
) |
||||||||||
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash, beginning of year |
||||||||||||
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash, end of year |
$ | $ | $ | |||||||||
Cash paid during the period for: |
||||||||||||
Interest |
$ | $ | $ | |||||||||
Income taxes, net |
$ | $ | $ |
As of December 31, 2020, there was $
The Company received income tax refunds of $
See Notes 4, 5, 14 and 20 for additional supplemental information to consolidated statements of cash flows.
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
JAKKS PACIFIC, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER 31, 2020
Note 1—Principal Industry
JAKKS Pacific, Inc. (the “Company”) is engaged in the development, production and marketing of consumer products, including toys and related products, electronic products, and other consumer products, many of which are based on highly-recognized character and entertainment licenses. The Company commenced its primary business operations in July 1995 through the purchase of substantially all of the assets of a Hong Kong toy company. The Company markets its product lines domestically and internationally.
The Company was incorporated under the laws of the State of Delaware in January 1995.
Liquidity
On January 30, 2020, the World Health Organization (“WHO”) announced a global health emergency because of a new strain of coronavirus originating in Wuhan, China (the “COVID-19 outbreak”) and the risks to the international community as the virus spreads globally beyond its point of origin. In March 2020, the WHO classified the COVID-19 outbreak as a pandemic, based on the rapid increase in exposure globally.
The full impact of the COVID-19 outbreak continues to evolve as of the date of this report. As such, it is uncertain as to the full magnitude that the pandemic will have on the Company’s financial condition, liquidity, and future results of operations. Management is actively monitoring the global situation and the resulting impact on its financial condition, liquidity, operations, suppliers, industry, and workforce. Given the daily evolution of the COVID-19 outbreak and the global responses to curb its spread, the Company is unable to estimate the effects of the COVID-19 outbreak on its results of operations, financial condition, and liquidity for fiscal years 2021 and 2022.
In mid-March 2020, the Company began migrating to a work-from-home model in compliance with local guidance. The Company continues to operate under that model as of the date of this filing.
On March 27, 2020, President Trump signed into law the “Coronavirus Aid, Relief and Economic Security Act (“CARES Act”). The CARES Act, among other things, includes provisions relating to refundable payroll tax credits, deferment of employer-side social security payments, net operating loss carryback periods, alternative minimum tax credit refunds, modifications to the net interest deduction limitations and technical corrections to tax depreciation methods for qualified improvement property. On December 27, 2020, President Trump signed into law the Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2021 (“CAA”), which includes many tax and health components, as well as CARES Act extensions and modifications. The Company continues to monitor and explore any relevant government assistance programs that could support either cash liquidity or operating results in the short-medium term. As of the filing of this document, the Company continues to have no draw down on its credit facility with Wells Fargo Bank, National Association (“Wells Fargo”), aside from utilizing $
On June 12, 2020, the Company received a $
It remains the Company’s intention to file for forgiveness of this loan. In the absence of knowing whether any funds will be forgiven and how the program may change as the year continues, the Company accounts for the note as debt under ASC 470 and has reflected $
On April 23, 2020, the Small Business Administration issued new guidance that questioned whether a public company with substantial market value and access to capital markets would qualify to participate in the Paycheck Protection Program. Subsequently, on April 28, 2020 the Secretary of the Treasury and Small Business Administrator announced that the government will review all PPP loans of more than $2.0 million for which the borrower applies for forgiveness. If the Company were to be audited and receive an adverse finding in such audit, the Company could be required to return the full amount of the PPP Loan, which could reduce its liquidity, and potentially subject it to fines and penalties.
As of December 31, 2020 and 2019, the Company held cash and cash equivalents, including restricted cash, of $
The Company’s primary sources of working capital are cash flows from operations and borrowings under its credit facility (see Note 11 - Credit Facilities). Cash flow from operating activities provided net cash of $
Typically, cash flows from operations are impacted by the effect on sales of (1) the appeal of the Company’s products, (2) the success of its licensed brands in motivating consumer purchase of related merchandise, (3) the highly competitive conditions existing in the toy industry and in securing commercially-attractive licenses, (4) dependency on a limited set of large customers, and (5) general economic conditions. A downturn in any single factor or a combination of factors could have a material adverse impact upon the Company’s ability to generate sufficient cash flows to operate the business. In addition, the Company’s business and liquidity are dependent to a significant degree on its vendors and their financial health, as well as the ability to accurately forecast the demand for products. The loss of a key vendor, or material changes in support by them, or a significant variance in actual demand compared to the forecast, can have a material adverse impact on the Company’s cash flows and business.
As of December 31, 2020, the Company had $
The New Term Loan Agreement and Amended ABL Credit Agreement each contain negative covenants that, subject to certain exceptions, limit the ability of the Company and its subsidiaries to, among other things, incur additional indebtedness, make restricted payments, pledge assets as security, make investments, loans, advances, guarantees and acquisitions, undergo fundamental changes and enter into transactions with affiliates, as well as cross-default provisions. The Company secured the appropriate waivers from both parties before receiving the proceeds of the PPP Loan. The original terms of the New Term Loan Agreement required the Company to maintain a trailing 12-month Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization (“EBITDA”) (as defined and adjusted therein) of not less than $
On October 16, 2020, the Company reached an agreement (the “Amendment”) with holders of its New Term Loan and Wells Fargo, holder of its revolving credit facility, to amend the New Term Loan Agreement and defer its EBITDA covenant calculation until March 31, 2022. Under the Amendment, the trailing 12-month EBITDA requirement was reduced to $
The New Term Loan Agreement contains events of default, including nonpayment of principal, nonpayment of interest, fees or other amounts, material inaccuracy of representations and warranties, violation of covenants, cross-default to other material indebtedness, bankruptcy or insolvency events, material judgment defaults and a change of control as specified in the New Term Loan Agreement, and cross-default provisions with the Amended Wells Fargo Credit Agreement. If an event of default occurs under either Agreement, the maturity of the amounts owed under the New Term Loan Agreement and the Amended Wells Fargo Credit Agreement may be accelerated.
The Company’s consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2020 have been prepared on a going concern basis, which contemplates the realization of assets and the settlement of liabilities and commitments in the normal course of business. Cash and cash equivalents, including restricted cash, projected cash flow from operations, and borrowings under the Company’s credit facility are sufficient to meet the Company’s working capital and capital expenditure requirements for the next 12 months.
Note 2—Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Principles of consolidation and basis of preparation
These consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company, its wholly-owned subsidiaries, and its majority owned joint venture. All intercompany transactions have been eliminated.
The Company entered into a joint venture with Meisheng Culture & Creative Corp., for the purpose of providing certain JAKKS licensed and non-licensed toys and consumer products to agreed-upon territories of the People’s Republic of China. The joint venture includes a subsidiary in the Shanghai Free Trade Zone that sells, distributes and markets these products, which include dolls, plush, role play products, action figures, costumes, seasonal items, technology and app-enhanced toys, based on top entertainment licenses and JAKKS’ own proprietary brands. The Company owns
Effective July 9, 2020, the Company completed a
Cash and cash equivalents
The Company considers all highly liquid investments with an original maturity of three months or less, when acquired, to be cash equivalents. The Company maintains its cash in bank deposits which, at times, may exceed federally insured limits. The Company has not experienced any losses in such accounts. The Company believes it is not exposed to any significant credit risk of cash and cash equivalents.
Restricted cash
Restricted cash consists primarily of a Wells Fargo collateral account established to cover the excess Wells Fargo borrowing base availability shortfall and a cash collateral account to cover a guarantee bond.
Accounts Receivable and Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
Credit is granted to customers on an unsecured basis. Credit limits and payment terms are established based on evaluations made on an ongoing basis throughout the fiscal year of the financial performance, cash generation, financing availability, and liquidity status of each customer. Customers are reviewed at least annually, with more frequent reviews performed as necessary, depending upon the customer’s financial condition and the level of credit being extended. For customers who are experiencing financial difficulties, management performs additional financial analyses before shipping to those customers on credit. The Company uses a variety of financial arrangements to ensure collectability of accounts receivable of customers deemed to be a credit risk, including requiring letters of credit, purchasing various forms of credit insurance with unrelated third parties, or requiring cash in advance of shipment.
The Company records an allowance for doubtful accounts based upon management’s assessment of the business environment, customers’ financial condition, historical collection experience, accounts receivable aging, customer disputes and the collectability of specific customer accounts.
Use of estimates
The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the dates of the consolidated financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting periods. Actual future results could differ from those estimates. On an ongoing basis, the Company evaluates its estimates, including those related to the accounts receivable and sales allowances, fair values of financial instruments, intangible assets and goodwill, useful lives of intangible assets and property and equipment, income taxes, and contingent liabilities, among others. The Company bases its estimates on assumptions, both historical and forward looking, that are believed to be reasonable, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities.
Revenue recognition
The Company’s contracts with customers only include one performance obligation (i.e., sale of the Company’s products). Revenue is recognized in the gross amount at a point in time when delivery is completed and control of the promised goods is transferred to the customers. Revenue is measured as the amount of consideration the Company expects to be entitled to in exchange for those goods. The Company’s contracts do not involve financing elements as payment terms with customers are less than one year. Further, because revenue is recognized at the point in time goods are sold to customers, there are no contract assets or contract liability balances.
The Company disaggregates its revenues from contracts with customers by reporting segment: Toys/Consumer Products and Halloween. The Company further disaggregates revenues by major geographic regions (See Note 3 - Business Segments, Geographic Data, and Sales by Major Customers for further information).
The Company offers various discounts, pricing concessions, and other allowances to customers, all of which are considered in determining the transaction price. Certain discounts and allowances are fixed and determinable at the time of sale and are recorded at the time of sale as a reduction to revenue. Other discounts and allowances can vary and are determined at management’s discretion (variable consideration). Specifically, the Company occasionally grants discretionary credits to facilitate markdowns and sales of slow moving merchandise, and consequently accrues an allowance based on historic credits and management estimates. Further, while the Company generally does not allow product returns, the Company does make occasional exceptions to this policy, and consequently records a sales return allowance based upon historic return amounts and management estimates. These allowances (variable consideration) are estimated using the expected value method and are recorded at the time of sale as a reduction to revenue. The Company adjusts its estimate of variable consideration at least quarterly or when facts and circumstances used in the estimation process may change. The variable consideration is not constrained as the Company has sufficient history on the related estimates and does not believe there is a risk of significant revenue reversal.
The Company also participates in cooperative advertising arrangements with some customers, whereby it allows a discount from invoiced product amounts in exchange for customer purchased advertising that features the Company’s products. Generally, these allowances range from
Sales commissions are expensed when incurred as the related revenue is recognized at a point in time and therefore the amortization period is less than one year. As a result, these costs are recorded as direct selling expenses, as incurred.
Shipping and handling activities are considered part of the Company’s obligation to transfer the products and therefore are recorded as direct selling expenses, as incurred.
The Company’s reserve for sales returns and allowances amounted to $
Fair Value Measurements
Fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. In determining fair value, the Company uses various methods including market, income and cost approaches. Based upon these approaches, the Company often utilizes certain assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability, including assumptions about risk and/or the risks inherent in the inputs to the valuation technique. These inputs can be readily observable, market-corroborated, or unobservable inputs. The Company utilizes valuation techniques that maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs. Based upon observable inputs used in the valuation techniques, the Company is required to provide information according to the fair value hierarchy. The fair value hierarchy ranks the quality and reliability of the information used to determine fair values into three broad levels as follows:
Level 1: |
Valuations for assets and liabilities traded in active markets from readily available pricing sources for market transactions involving identical assets or liabilities. |
Level 2: |
Valuations for assets and liabilities traded in less active dealer or broker markets. Valuations are obtained from third-party pricing services for identical or similar assets or liabilities. |
Level 3: |
Valuations incorporate certain assumptions and projections in determining the fair value assigned to such assets or liabilities. |
In instances where the determination of the fair value measurement is based upon inputs from different levels of the fair value hierarchy, the level in the fair value hierarchy within which the entire fair value measurement falls is based upon the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety. The Company’s assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement in its entirety requires judgment, and considers factors specific to the asset or liability.
Inventory
Inventory, which includes the ex-factory cost of goods, capitalized warehouse costs and in-bound freight and duty, is valued at the lower of cost (first-in, first-out) or net realizable value, net of inventory obsolescence reserve, and consists of the following (in thousands):
December 31, |
||||||||
2020 |
2019 |
|||||||
Raw materials |
$ | $ | ||||||
Finished goods |
||||||||
$ | $ |
As of December 31, 2020 and 2019, the inventory obsolescence reserve was $
Property and equipment
Property and equipment are stated at cost and are being depreciated using the straight-line method over their estimated useful lives as follows:
Office equipment |
|
Automobiles |
|
Furniture and fixtures |
|
Leasehold improvements |
Shorter of length of lease or |
During interim reporting periods, the Company uses the usage method as its depreciation methodology for molds and tools used in the manufacturing of its products, which is more closely correlated to the production of goods as it follows the seasonality of sales. The Company believes that the usage method more accurately matches costs with revenues. From a full-year perspective, the depreciation methodology follows the straight-line method, based on the estimated useful life of molds and tools of three years. Estimated useful lives are periodically reviewed and, where appropriate, changes are made prospectively. The carrying value of property and equipment is reviewed when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of an asset may not be recoverable. No impairment charges were recorded for the year ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018.
For the year ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018, the Company’s aggregate depreciation expense related to property and equipment was $
For the year ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018, the Company recorded a loss on disposal of tools and molds of $
Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Other comprehensive income (loss) includes all changes in equity from non-owner sources. The Company accounts for other comprehensive income in accordance with Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) ASC 220, “Comprehensive Income.” All the activity in other comprehensive income (loss) and all amounts in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) relate to foreign currency translation adjustments.
Advertising
Production costs of commercials and programming are charged to operations in the period during which the production is first aired. The costs of other advertising, promotion and marketing programs are charged to operations in the period incurred. Advertising expense for the year ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018, was approximately $
Income taxes
The Company does not file a consolidated return with its foreign subsidiaries. The Company files federal and state returns and its foreign subsidiaries file returns in their respective jurisdictions. Deferred taxes are provided on an asset and liability method. Deferred tax assets are recognized as deductible temporary differences, operating losses, or tax credit carry-forwards. Deferred tax liabilities are recognized as taxable temporary differences. Temporary differences are the differences between the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and their tax basis. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance when, in the opinion of management, it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are adjusted for the effects of changes in tax laws and rates on the date of enactment.
The Company recognizes net deferred tax assets to the extent that the Company believes these assets are more likely than not to be realized. In making such a determination, management considers all available positive and negative evidence, including future reversals of existing taxable temporary differences, projected future taxable income, tax-planning strategies, and results of recent operations. If management determines that the Company would be able to realize its deferred tax assets in the future in excess of their net recorded amount, management would make an adjustment to the deferred tax asset valuation allowance, which would reduce the provision for income taxes.
The Company records uncertain tax positions on the basis of a two-step process whereby (1) management determines whether it is more likely than not that the tax positions will be sustained on the basis of the technical merits of the position and (2) for those tax positions that meet the more-likely-than-not recognition threshold, management recognizes the largest amount of tax benefit that is more than 50% likely to be realized upon ultimate settlement with the related tax authority. The Company recognizes interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits within income tax expense. Any accrued interest and penalties are included within the related tax liability.
Foreign Currency Translation Exposure
The Company’s reporting currency is the U.S. dollar. The translation of its net investment in subsidiaries with non-U.S. dollar functional currencies subjects the Company to currency exchange rate fluctuations in its results of operations and financial position. Assets and liabilities of subsidiaries with non-U.S. dollar functional currencies are translated into U.S. dollars at year-end exchange rates. Income, expense and cash flow items are translated at average exchange rates prevailing during the year. The resulting currency translation adjustments are recorded as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) within stockholders’ equity. The Company’s primary currency translation exposures in 2020, 2019 and 2018 were related to its net investment in entities having functional currencies denominated in the Hong Kong Dollar, British Pound, Canadian Dollar, Chinese Yuan, Mexican Peso and the Euro.
Foreign Currency Transaction Exposure
Currency exchange rate fluctuations may impact the Company’s results of operations and cash flows. The Company’s currency transaction exposures include gains and losses realized on unhedged inventory purchases and unhedged receivables and payables balances that are denominated in a currency other than the applicable functional currency. Gains and losses on unhedged inventory purchases and other transactions associated with operating activities are recorded in the components of operating income in the consolidated statement of operations.
Accounting for the impairment of finite-lived tangible and intangible assets
Long-lived assets with finite lives, which include property and equipment and intangible assets other than goodwill, are evaluated for impairment when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the assets may not be recoverable through the estimated undiscounted future cash flows from the use of these assets. When any such impairment exists, the related assets will be written down to fair value. Finite-lived intangible assets often consist of product technology rights, acquired backlog, customer relationships, product lines and license agreements. These intangible assets are amortized over the estimated economic lives of the related assets.
Goodwill and other indefinite-lived intangible assets
Goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets are not amortized, but are tested for impairment at least annually at the reporting unit level and asset level, respectively. Losses in value are recorded when material impairment has occurred in the underlying assets or when the benefits of the identified intangible assets are realized. Indefinite-lived intangible assets other than goodwill consist of trademarks.
The carrying value of goodwill and trademarks is based upon cost, which is subject to management’s current assessment of fair value. Management evaluates fair value recoverability using both objective and subjective factors. Objective factors include cash flows and analysis of recent sales and earnings trends. Subjective factors include management’s best estimates of projected future earnings and competitive analysis and the Company’s strategic focus.
Share-based Compensation
The Company measures all employee share-based compensation awards using a fair value method and records such expense in its consolidated financial statements.
Earnings (Loss) per share
A reconciliation of the amounts used to calculate basic and diluted loss per share for the year ended December 31, 2020, 2019, and 2018 follows (in thousands, except per share data):
Year Ended December 31, |
||||||||||||
2020 |
2019 |
2018 |
||||||||||
Net loss |
$ | ( |
) |
$ | ( |
) |
$ | ( |
) |
|||
Net income (loss) attributable to non-controlling interests |
( |
) |
||||||||||
Net loss attributable to JAKKS Pacific, Inc. |
( |
) |
( |
) |
( |
) |
||||||
Preferred stock dividend |
( |
) |
( |
) |
||||||||
Net loss attributable to common stockholders |
$ | ( |
) |
$ | ( |
) |
$ | ( |
) |
|||
Weighted average common shares outstanding - basic and diluted |
||||||||||||
Loss per share available to common stockholders - basic and diluted |
$ | ( |
) |
$ | ( |
) |
$ | ( |
) |
Basic earnings per share is calculated using the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per share is calculated using the weighted average number of common shares and common share equivalents outstanding during the period (which consist of restricted stock awards, restricted stock units and convertible debt to the extent they are dilutive). For the year ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018, the convertible senior notes interest and related weighted common share equivalent of
The Company effectively repurchased
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In June 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2016-13, “Financial Instruments-Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments,” which require a financial asset (or a group of financial assets) measured at amortized cost basis to be presented at the net amount expected to be collected. The new standard was initially effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, including interim periods within those fiscal years. In November 2019, the FASB issued ASU 2019-10 which deferred the effective date of ASU 2016-13 by three years for Smaller Reporting Companies. As a result, the effective date for the standard is fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2022, and interim periods therein, and early adoption is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of the adoption of ASU 2016-13 on its consolidated financial statements.
In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-13, “Disclosure Framework - Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Fair Value Measurement,” which improves the effectiveness of the disclosures required under ASC 820 and modifies the disclosure requirements on fair value measurements, including the consideration of costs and benefits. The new standard is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, including interim periods within those fiscal years, and early adoption is permitted. The adoption of this standard did not have an impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
In October 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-17, "Consolidation: Targeted Improvements to Related Party Guidance for Variable Interest Entities," which improves the accounting for variable interest entities by considering indirect interests held through related parties under common control for determining whether fees paid to decision makers and service providers are variable interests. This new standard is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, including interim periods within those fiscal years. The amendments are required to be applied retrospectively with a cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings at the beginning of the earliest period presented. Early adoption is permitted. The adoption of this standard did not have an impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements.
In December 2019, the FASB issued ASU 2019-12, “Simplifying the Accounting for Income Taxes,” which simplifies the accounting for income taxes related to the approach for intra-period tax allocation, the methodology for calculating income taxes in an interim period, and the recognition of deferred tax assets for investments. The guidance also reduces complexity in certain areas, including the accounting for transactions that result in a step-up in the tax basis of goodwill and allocating taxes to members of a consolidated group. This new standard is effective for the Company for fiscal years beginning January 1, 2021, with early adoption permitted. The Company does not expect any material impact on its consolidated financial statements from the adoption of this standard.
In March 2020, the FASB issued ASU 2020-04, “Reference Rate Reform (Topic 848): Facilitation of the Effects of Reference Rate Reform on Financial Reporting.” The new standard provides optional expedients and exceptions for applying U.S. GAAP to contracts, hedging relationships, and other transactions, for a limited period of time, to ease the potential burden of recognizing the effects of reference rate reform on financial reporting. The amendments in ASU 2020-04 apply to contracts, hedging relationships and other transactions that reference the London Inter-Bank Offered Rate ("LIBOR") or another reference rate expected to be discontinued due to the global transition away from LIBOR and certain other interbank offered rates. The new standard is effective for the Company for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2022, including interim periods within these fiscal years, with early adoption permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact that the adoption of this new guidance will have on its consolidated financial statements.
Note 3—Business Segments, Geographic Data and Sales by Major Customers
The Company is a worldwide producer and marketer of children’s toys and other consumer products, principally engaged in the design, development, production, marketing and distribution of its diverse portfolio of products. The Company recently re-aligned its products into
The Toys/Consumer Products segment includes action figures, vehicles, play sets, plush products, dolls, electronic products, construction toys, infant and pre-school toys, child-sized and hand held role play toys and everyday costume play, foot to floor ride-on vehicles, wagons, novelty toys, seasonal and outdoor products, kids’ indoor and outdoor furniture, and related products, and makeup and skincare products under the C’est Moi brand.
Within the Halloween segment, the Company markets and sells Halloween costumes and accessories and everyday costume play products.
Segment performance is measured at the operating income (loss) level. All sales are made to external customers and general corporate expenses have been attributed to the various segments based upon relative sales volumes. Segment assets are primarily comprised of accounts receivable and inventories, net of applicable reserves and allowances, goodwill and other assets. Certain assets which are not tracked by operating segment and/or that benefit multiple operating segments have been allocated on the same basis.
Results are not necessarily those which would be achieved if each segment was an unaffiliated business enterprise. Information by segment and a reconciliation to reported amounts as of December 31, 2020 and 2019 and for the three years in the period ended December 31, 2020 are as follows (in thousands):
Year Ended December 31, |
||||||||||||
2020 |
2019 |
2018 |
||||||||||
Net Sales |
||||||||||||
Toys/Consumer Products |
$ | $ | $ | |||||||||
Halloween |
||||||||||||
$ | $ | $ |
Year Ended December 31, |
||||||||||||
2020 |
2019 |
2018 |
||||||||||
Income (Loss) from Operations |
||||||||||||
Toys/Consumer Products |
$ | $ | ( |
) |
$ | ( |
) |
|||||
Halloween |
( |
) |
( |
) |
( |
) |
||||||
$ | $ | ( |
) |
$ | ( |
) |
Year Ended December 31, |
||||||||||||
2020 |
2019 |
2018 |
||||||||||
Depreciation and Amortization Expense |
||||||||||||
Toys/Consumer Products |
$ | $ | $ | |||||||||
Halloween |
||||||||||||
$ | $ | $ |
December 31, |
||||||||
2020 |
2019 |
|||||||
Assets |
||||||||
Toys/Consumer Products |
$ | $ | ||||||
Halloween |
||||||||
$ | $ |
Net revenues are categorized based upon location of the customer, while long-lived assets are categorized based upon the location of the Company’s assets. The following tables present information about the Company by geographic area as of December 31, 2020 and 2019 and for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2020 (in thousands):
December 31, |
||||||||
2020 |
2019 |
|||||||
Long-lived Assets |
||||||||
United States |
$ | $ | ||||||
China |
||||||||
Hong Kong |
||||||||
United Kingdom |
||||||||
Canada |
||||||||
Mexico |
||||||||
$ | $ |
Year Ended December 31, |
||||||||||||
2020 |
2019 |
2018 |
||||||||||
Net Sales by Customer Area |
||||||||||||
United States |
$ | $ | $ | |||||||||
Europe |
||||||||||||
Canada |
||||||||||||
Asia |
||||||||||||
Latin America |
||||||||||||
Australia and New Zealand |
||||||||||||
Middle East and Africa |
||||||||||||
$ | $ | $ |
Major Customers
Net sales to major customers were as follows (in thousands, except for percentages):
2020 |
2019 |
2018 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Amount |
Percentage of Net Sales |
Amount |
Percentage of Net Sales |
Amount |
Percentage of Net Sales |
|||||||||||||||||||
Wal-Mart |
$ |
% |
$ |
% |
$ |
% |
||||||||||||||||||
Target |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
$ |
% |
$ |
% |
$ |
% |
No other customer accounted for more than 10% of the Company's total net sales.
The concentration of the Company’s business with a relatively small number of customers may expose the Company to material adverse effects if one or more of its large customers were to experience financial difficulty. The Company performs ongoing credit evaluations of its top customers and maintains an allowance for potential credit losses.
Note 4—Joint Ventures
On December 16, 2009, the Company entered into a joint venture agreement with the U.S. entertainment subsidiary of a leading Japanese advertising and animation production company in which it owned
As of December 31, 2020 and 2019, the balance of the investment in the Pacific Animation Partners joint venture is
.
In September 2012, the Company entered into a joint venture (“DreamPlay Toys”) with NantWorks LLC (“NantWorks”) in which it owns a fifty percent interest. Pursuant to the operating agreement of DreamPlay Toys, the Company paid to NantWorks cash in the amount of $
In addition, in 2012, the Company invested $
In November 2014, the Company entered into a joint venture with Meisheng Culture & Creative Corp., for the purpose of providing certain JAKKS licensed and non-licensed toys and consumer products to agreed-upon territories of the People’s Republic of China. The joint venture includes a subsidiary in the Shanghai Free Trade Zone that sells, distributes and markets these products, which include dolls, plush, role play products, action figures, costumes, seasonal items, technology and app-enhanced toys, based on top entertainment licenses and JAKKS’ own proprietary brands. The Company owns
In October 2016, the Company entered into a joint venture with Hong Kong Meisheng Cultural Company Limited (“Meisheng”), a Hong Kong-based subsidiary of Meisheng Culture & Creative Corp., for the purpose of creating and developing original, multiplatform content for children including new short-form series and original shows. JAKKS and Meisheng each own
In March 2017, the Company entered into an equity purchase agreement with Meisheng which provided, among other things, that as long as Meisheng and its affiliates hold
Note 5—Prepaid Expenses and Other Assets
Prepaid expenses and other assets for the year ended December 31, 2020 and 2019 consist of the following (in thousands):
December 31, |
||||||||
2020 |
2019 |
|||||||
Royalty advances |
$ | $ | ||||||
Prepaid expenses |
||||||||
Income taxes receivable |
||||||||
Other assets |
||||||||
$ | $ |
Note 6—Goodwill
There were no changes in the carrying amount of goodwill by reporting unit for the year ended December 31, 2020 and 2019.
The Company applies a fair value-based impairment test to the carrying value of goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets on an annual basis and, on an interim basis, if certain events or circumstances indicate that an impairment loss may have been incurred. Goodwill impairment exists when the estimated fair value of goodwill is less than its carrying value.
Based on several factors that occurred during the quarter ended March 31, 2020, the Company determined the fair value of its reporting units should be retested for potential impairment. As a result of the retesting performed, no goodwill impairment was determined to have occurred for the three months ended March 31, 2020.
Based on the Company’s April 1, 2020 annual assessment, it was determined that the fair values of its reporting units were not less than the carrying amounts. Also, no goodwill impairment was determined to have occurred for the year ended December 31, 2020.
Based on the Company’s April 1, 2019 annual assessment, it was determined that the fair values of its reporting units were not less than the carrying amounts. Also, no goodwill impairment was determined to have occurred for the year ended December 31, 2019.
Based on the Company’s April 1, 2018 annual assessment, it was determined that the fair values of its reporting units were not less than the carrying amounts. Also, no goodwill impairment was determined to have occurred for the year ended December 31, 2018.
In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-04, “Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment,” which removes Step 2 from the goodwill impairment test. ASU 2017-04 requires that if a reporting unit’s carrying value exceeds its fair value, an impairment charge would be recognized for the excess amount, not to exceed the carrying amount of goodwill. ASU 2017-04 is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2019. The Company early adopted ASU 2017-04 in the third quarter of 2017.
Note 7—Intangible Assets Other Than Goodwill
Intangible assets other than goodwill consist primarily of licenses, product lines, customer relationships and trademarks. Amortized intangible assets are included in intangibles in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. Trademarks are disclosed separately in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. Intangible assets are as follows (in thousands, except for weighted useful lives):
December 31, 2020 |
December 31, 2019 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Weighted Useful Lives |
Gross Carrying Amount |
Accumulated Amortization |
Net Amount |
Gross Carrying Amount |
Accumulated Amortization |
Net Amount |
|||||||||||||||||||||
(Years) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amortized Intangible Assets: |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Licenses |
$ | $ | ( |
) |
$ | $ | $ | ( |
) |
$ | |||||||||||||||||
Product lines |
( |
) |
( |
) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Customer relationships |
( |
) |
( |
) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Trade names |
( |
) |
( |
) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Non-compete agreements |
( |
) |
( |
) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Total amortized intangible assets |
$ | $ | ( |
) |
$ | $ | $ | ( |
) |
$ | |||||||||||||||||
Unamortized Intangible Assets: |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Trademarks |
$ | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ |
In 2019, the Company assessed the recoverability of the Maui product lines and determined that the fair value was less than its carrying amount. As a result, the Company recorded an impairment charge of $
For the year ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018, the Company’s aggregate amortization expense related to intangible assets was $
2021 |
$ | |||
2022 |
||||
$ |
Note 8—Concentration of Credit Risk
Financial instruments that subject the Company to concentration of credit risk are cash and cash equivalents and accounts receivable. Cash equivalents consist principally of short-term money market funds. These instruments are short-term in nature and bear minimal risk.
The Company performs ongoing credit evaluations of its customers’ financial conditions, but does not require collateral to support domestic customer accounts receivable. For goods shipped FOB Hong Kong or China, the Company may require irrevocable letters of credit from the customer or purchase various forms of credit insurance.
Note 9—Accrued Expenses
Accrued expenses consist of the following (in thousands):
December 31, |
||||||||
2020 |
2019 |
|||||||
Royalties |
$ | $ | ||||||
Inventory liabilities |
||||||||
Interest expense |
||||||||
Salaries and employee benefits |
||||||||
Goods in transit |
||||||||
Professional fees |
||||||||
Unearned revenue |
||||||||
Bonuses |
||||||||
Sales commissions |
||||||||
Unclaimed property liability |
||||||||
Other |
||||||||
$ | $ |
In addition to royalties currently payable on the sale of licensed products during the year, the Company records a liability as accrued royalties for the estimated shortfall in achieving minimum royalty guarantees pursuant to certain license agreements (see Note 17 - Commitments).
Note 10—Debt
Convertible senior notes
Convertible senior notes consist of the following (in thousands):
December 31, 2020 |
December 31, 2019 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Principal/ Fair Value Amount |
Debt Issuance Costs |
Net Amount |
Principal/ Fair Value Amount |
Debt Issuance Costs |
Net Amount |
|||||||||||||||||||
|
$ | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | ||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total convertible senior notes |
$ | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ |
*The amounts presented for the
In July 2013, the Company sold an aggregate of $
In August 2017, the Company agreed with Oasis Management and Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd., (collectively, “Oasis”) the holder of approximately $
The remaining $
In August 2019, the Company entered into and consummated multiple, binding definitive agreements (collectively, the “Recapitalization Transaction”) among Wells Fargo, Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd. and an ad hoc group of holders of the
In connection with the Recapitalization Transaction, the Company issued (i) amended and restated notes with respect to the $
Excluding the impact of the 1 for 10 reverse stock split, the New Oasis Notes provide, among other things, that the initial conversion price is $
In June 2020, $
A director of the Company is a portfolio manager at Oasis Management.
The Company has elected to measure and present the debt held by Oasis at fair value using Level 3 inputs and as a result, recognized a gain (loss) of
The Company evaluated its credit risk as of December 31, 2020, and determined that there was no change from December 31, 2019.
In June 2014, the Company sold an aggregate of $
In connection with the Recapitalization Transaction, the 2020 Notes with a face amount of $
The remaining $1.9 million principal amount of the 2020 Notes were redeemed at par at maturity on June 1, 2020.
The fair value of the
Key components of the 4.25% convertible senior notes due 2018 consist of the following (in thousands):
Year ended December 31, |
||||||||||||
2020 |
2019 |
2018 |
||||||||||
Contractual interest expense |
$ | $ | $ | |||||||||
Amortization of debt issuance costs recognized as interest expense |
||||||||||||
$ | $ | $ |
Key components of the 4.875% convertible senior notes due 2020 consist of the following (in thousands):
Year ended December 31, |
||||||||||||
2020 |
2019 |
2018 |
||||||||||
Contractual interest expense |
$ | $ | $ | |||||||||
Amortization of debt issuance costs recognized as interest expense |
||||||||||||
$ | $ | $ |
Key components of the 3.25% convertible senior notes due 2020 consist of the following (in thousands):
Year ended December 31, |
||||||||||||
2020 |
2019 |
2018 |
||||||||||
Contractual interest expense |
$ | $ | $ |
Key components of the 3.25% convertible senior notes due 2023 consist of the following (in thousands):
Year ended December 31, |
||||||||||||
2020 |
2019 |
2018 |
||||||||||
Contractual interest expense |
$ | $ | $ |
On February 5, 2021, Benefit Street Partners and Oasis Investment II Master Funds Ltd, both related parties, entered into a purchase and sale agreement wherein Benefit Street Partners purchased $
Term Loan
Term loan consists of the following (in thousands):
December 31, 2020 |
December 31, 2019 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Principal Amount** |
Debt Discount/ Issuance Costs* |
Net Amount |
Principal Amount** |
Debt Discount/ Issuance Costs* |
Net Amount |
|||||||||||||||||||
Term Loan |
$ | $ | ( |
) |
$ | $ | $ | ( |
) |
$ |
* The term loan was valued using the discounted cash flow method to determine the implied debt discount. The debt discount and issuance costs are being amortized over the life of the term loan.
** The amount presented excludes accrued, but unpaid, payment-in-kind interest of $
In August 2019, in connection with the Recapitalization Transaction, the Company entered into a First Lien Term Loan Facility Credit Agreement (the “New Term Loan Agreement”), with certain of the Investor Parties, and Cortland Capital Market Services LLC, as agent, for a $
Amounts outstanding under the New Term Loan accrue interest at
The New Term Loan Agreement contains negative covenants that, subject to certain exceptions, limit the ability of the Company and its subsidiaries to, among other things, incur additional indebtedness, make restricted payments, pledge assets as security, make investments, loans, advances, guarantees and acquisitions, undergo fundamental changes and enter into transactions with affiliates. The original terms of the New Term Loan Agreement required the Company to maintain a trailing 12-month EBITDA (as defined and adjusted therein) of not less than $
On October 16, 2020, the Company reached an agreement (the “Amendment”) with holders of its New Term Loan and Wells Fargo, holder of its revolving credit facility, to amend its New Term Loan Agreement and defer its EBITDA covenant calculation until March 31, 2022. Under the Amendment, the trailing 12-month EBITDA requirement was reduced to $
The New Term Loan Agreement contains events of default that are customary for a facility of this nature, including nonpayment of principal, nonpayment of interest, fees or other amounts, material inaccuracy of representations and warranties, violation of covenants, cross-default to other material indebtedness, bankruptcy or insolvency events, material judgment defaults and a change of control as specified in the New Term Loan Agreement. If an event of default occurs, the maturity of the amounts owed under the New Term Loan Agreement may be accelerated.
The obligations under the New Term Loan Agreement are guaranteed by the Company, the subsidiary borrowers thereunder and certain of the other existing and future direct and indirect subsidiaries of the Company and are secured by substantially all of the assets of the Company, the subsidiary borrowers thereunder and such other subsidiary guarantors, in each case, subject to certain exceptions and permitted liens.
Amortization expense classified as interest expense related to the $
Amortization expense classified as interest expense related to the $
The fair value of the New Term Loan as of December 31, 2020 and 2019 was $
Loan under Paycheck Protection Program
On June 12, 2020, the Company received a $
The carrying value of the PPP Loan is a reasonable approximation of fair value.
Note 11—Credit Facilities
Wells Fargo
In March 2014, the Company and its domestic subsidiaries entered into a secured credit facility with General Electric Capital Corporation (“GECC”). The credit facility, as amended and subsequently assigned to Wells Fargo Bank pursuant to its acquisition of GECC, provides for a $
The obligations under the Amended ABL Credit Agreement are guaranteed by the Company, the subsidiary borrowers thereunder and certain of the other existing and future direct and indirect subsidiaries of the Company and are secured by substantially all of the assets of the Company, the subsidiary borrowers thereunder and such other subsidiary guarantors, in each case, subject to certain exceptions and permitted liens. As of December 31, 2020, the amount of outstanding borrowings was
The Amended ABL Credit Agreement contains negative covenants that, subject to certain exceptions, limit the ability of the Company and its subsidiaries to, among other things, incur additional indebtedness, make restricted payments, pledge assets as security, make investments, loans, advances, guarantees and acquisitions, undergo fundamental changes and enter into transactions with affiliates. The Company is also required to maintain a fixed charge coverage ratio of not less than
Any amounts borrowed under the Amended ABL Facility accrue interest, at either (i) LIBOR plus
The Amended ABL Facility also contains customary events of default, including a cross default provision and a change of control provision. In the event of a default, all of the obligations of the Company and its subsidiaries under the Amended ABL Facility may be declared immediately due and payable. For certain events of default relating to insolvency, all outstanding obligations become due and payable.
As described in Note 10 – Debt, on October 16, 2020, the Company amended its New Term Loan to reduce the amount and defer the calculation of its EBITDA covenant, with Wells Fargo as party to the agreement.
As of December 31, 2020, off-balance sheet arrangements include letters of credit issued by Wells Fargo of $
Great American Capital Partners
On June 14, 2018, the Company entered into a Term Loan Agreement, Term Note, Guaranty and Security Agreement and other ancillary documents and agreements (the “Term Loan”) with Great American Capital Partners Finance Co., LLC (“GACP”), for itself as a Lender (as defined below) and as the Agent (in such capacity, “Agent”) for the Lenders from time to time party to the Term Loan (collectively, “Lenders”) and the other “Secured Parties” under and as defined therein, with respect to the issuance to the Company by Lenders of a $
The Term Loan required the repayment of principal in the amount of
In August 2019, in connection with the Recapitalization Transaction (See Note 10 - Debt), the Company repaid in full and terminated the Term Loan Agreement.
Amortization expense classified as interest expense related to the $
Note 12—Related Party Transactions
A former director of the Company, who resigned on August 9, 2019 is a partner in a law firm that acts as counsel to the Company. The Company incurred legal fees and expenses to the law firm in the amount of approximately $
The owner of NantWorks, the Company’s DreamPlay Toys joint venture partner, beneficially owned more than
In November 2014, the Company entered into a joint venture with Meisheng Cultural & Creative Corp., Ltd., for the purpose of providing certain JAKKS licensed and non-licensed toys and consumer products to agreed-upon territories of the People’s Republic of China. The joint venture includes a subsidiary in the Shanghai Free Trade Zone that sells, distributes and markets these products, which include dolls, plush, role play products, action figures, costumes, seasonal items, technology and app-enhanced toys, based on top entertainment licenses and JAKKS’ own proprietary brands. The Company owns
In October 2016, the Company entered into a joint venture with Hong Kong Meisheng Cultural Company Limited (“Meisheng”), a Hong Kong-based subsidiary of Meisheng Culture & Creative Corp, for the purpose of creating and developing original, multiplatform content for children including new short-form series and original shows. JAKKS and Meisheng each own
In March 2017, the Company entered into an agreement to issue
Meisheng also serves as a significant manufacturer of the Company. In the first quarter of 2019, Meisheng acquired New Time Group, which was a third-party manufacturer of the Company. For the year ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018, the Company made inventory-related payments to Meisheng of approximately $
A director of the Company is a portfolio manager at Oasis Management. In August 2017, the Company agreed with Oasis Management and Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd., the holder of approximately $
A director of the Company is a director at Benefit Street Partners. As of December 31, 2020, Benefit Street Partners held $
A director of the Company is the managing Partner and portfolio manager at Axar Capital Management. As of December 31, 2020, Axar Capital Management held $
Note 13—Income Taxes
The Company does not file a consolidated return with its foreign subsidiaries. The Company files federal and state returns and its foreign subsidiaries file returns in their respective jurisdiction.
For the year ended 2020, 2019 and 2018, the provision for income taxes, which included federal, state and foreign income taxes, was an expense of $
The 2020 tax expense of $0.7 million included a discrete tax benefit of ($
For the year ended 2019 and 2018, provision for income taxes includes federal, state and foreign income taxes at effective tax rates of (3.6%) and (7.5%). Exclusive of discrete items, the effective tax provision rate would be (
As of December 31, 2020 and 2019, the Company had net deferred tax liabilities of approximately $
Provision for income taxes reflected in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations are comprised of the following (in thousands):
Year ended December 31, |
||||||||||||
2020 |
2019 |
2018 |
||||||||||
Federal |
$ | ( |
) |
$ | ( |
) |
$ | ( |
) |
|||
State and local |
||||||||||||
Foreign |
||||||||||||
Total Current |
||||||||||||
Deferred |
( |
) |
||||||||||
Total |
$ | $ | $ |
The components of deferred tax assets/(liabilities) are as follows (in thousands):
December 31, |
||||||||
2020 |
2019 |
|||||||
Net deferred tax assets/(liabilities): |
||||||||
Reserve for sales allowances and possible losses |
$ | $ | ||||||
Accrued expenses |
||||||||
Prepaid royalties |
||||||||
Accrued royalties |
||||||||
Inventory |
||||||||
State income taxes |
||||||||
Property and equipment |
||||||||
Goodwill and intangibles |
||||||||
Share-based compensation |
||||||||
Interest limitation |
||||||||
Undistributed foreign earnings |
( |
) |
( |
) |
||||
Operating lease right-of-use assets |
( |
) |
( |
) |
||||
Operating lease liabilities |
||||||||
Federal and state net operating loss carryforwards |
||||||||
Credit carryforwards |
||||||||
Other |
||||||||
Gross |
||||||||
Valuation allowance |
( |
) |
( |
) |
||||
Total net deferred tax liabilities |
$ | ( |
) |
$ | ( |
) |
Provision for income taxes varies from the U.S. federal statutory rate. The following reconciliation shows the significant differences in the tax at statutory and effective rates:
Year ended December 31, |
||||||||||||
2020 |
2019 |
2018 |
||||||||||
Federal income tax expense |
% |
% |
% |
|||||||||
State income tax expense, net of federal tax effect |
||||||||||||
Effect of differences in U.S. and foreign statutory rates |
||||||||||||
Uncertain tax positions |
( |
) |
( |
) |
||||||||
Provision to return |
( |
) |
( |
) |
||||||||
Non-deductible expenses |
( |
) |
( |
) |
( |
) |
||||||
Other |
( |
) |
( |
) |
||||||||
Undistributed foreign earnings |
( |
) |
||||||||||
Valuation allowance |
( |
) |
||||||||||
( |
)% |
( |
)% |
( |
)% |
Deferred taxes result from temporary differences between tax basis of assets and liabilities and their reported amounts in the consolidated financial statements. The temporary differences result from costs required to be capitalized for tax purposes by the U.S. Internal Revenue Code, and certain items accrued for financial reporting purposes in the year incurred but not deductible for tax purposes until paid. The Company has established a valuation allowance on net deferred tax assets in the United States since, in the opinion of management, it is not more likely than not that the U.S. net deferred tax assets will be realized.
The components of income (loss) before provision for income taxes are as follows (in thousands):
Year ended December 31, |
||||||||||||
2020 |
2019 |
2018 |
||||||||||
Domestic |
$ | ( |
) |
$ | ( |
) |
$ | ( |
) |
|||
Foreign |
||||||||||||
$ | ( |
) |
$ | ( |
) |
$ | ( |
) |
The Company uses a recognition threshold and measurement process for recording in the consolidated financial statements uncertain tax positions (“UTP”) taken or expected to be taken in a tax return.
Approximately $
Current interest on uncertain income tax liabilities is recognized as a component of the income tax provision recognized in the consolidated statements of operations. During 2020, the Company did not recognize any current year interest expense relating to UTPs. During 2019, the Company recognized an additional $
The following table provides further information of UTPs that would affect the effective tax rate, if recognized, as of December 31, 2020 (in millions):
Balance, December 31, 2017 |
$ | |||
Current year additions |
||||
Current year reduction due to audit settlement |
( |
) |
||
Balance, December 31, 2018 |
||||
Current year additions |
||||
Balance, December 31, 2019 |
||||
Current year reduction |
( |
) |
||
Balance, December 31, 2020 |
$ |
The Company does not expect its gross unrecognized tax benefits to significantly change within the next 12 months.
Tax years 2017 through 2019 remain subject to examination in the United States. The tax years 2016 through 2019 are generally still subject to examination in the various states. The tax years 2014 through 2019 are still subject to examination in Hong Kong. In the normal course of business, the Company is audited by federal, state and foreign tax authorities.
Management assesses the available positive and negative evidence to estimate if sufficient future taxable income will be generated to use the existing deferred tax assets by jurisdiction. The Company is required to establish a valuation allowance for the U.S. deferred tax assets and record a charge to income if Management determines, based upon available evidence at the time the determination is made, that it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets may not be realized.
Based on our evaluation of all positive and negative evidence, as of December 31, 2020, a valuation allowance of $
At December 31, 2020, the Company has U.S. federal net operating loss carryforwards, or "NOLs", of approximately $
Note 14—Leases
The Company determines if an arrangement is a lease at inception. Operating leases are included in operating lease right-of-use (“ROU”) assets and operating lease liabilities in its consolidated balance sheets. The Company does not have any finance leases.
ROU assets represent the Company's right to use an underlying asset for the lease term and lease liabilities represent its obligation to make lease payments arising from the lease. Operating lease ROU assets and liabilities are recognized at commencement date based on the present value of lease payments over the lease term. As most of the Company’s leases do not provide an implicit interest rate, the Company uses its incremental borrowing rate based on the information available at commencement date in determining the present value of lease payments. The operating lease ROU asset also includes any prepaid lease amounts and excludes lease incentives. The Company’s lease terms may include options to extend or terminate the lease when it is reasonably certain that it will exercise that option. Lease expense for lease payments is recognized on a straight-line basis over the lease term.
The Company has lease agreements with lease and non-lease components, which are generally accounted for separately. The Company has operating leases for corporate offices, warehouses, and certain equipment. The Company’s leases have remaining lease terms of
The Company adopted ASC 842 effective January 1, 2019. The Company also elected the practical expedients to exclude right-of-use ("ROU") assets and lease liabilities for leases with an initial term of 12 months or less from the balance sheet. Under ASC 842, total operating lease costs for the year ended December 31, 2020 and 2019 were $
Under ASC 840, rent expense for the year ended December 31, 2018 totaled $
The Company had a cash outflow of $
The following table represents a reconciliation of the Company’s undiscounted future minimum lease payments under operating leases to the lease liability excluding minimum lease payments for executed and legally enforceable leases that have not yet commenced as of December 31, 2020 (in thousands):
Year ending December 31, |
||||
2021 |
$ | |||
2022 |
||||
2023 |
||||
2024 |
||||
2025 |
||||
Thereafter |
||||
Total lease payments |
||||
Less imputed interest |
||||
Total |
$ |
As of December 31, 2020, the minimum lease payments for executed and legally enforceable leases that have not yet commenced were $
Note 15—Common Stock and Preferred Stock
Common Stock
Effective July 9, 2020, the Company completed a
The Company has
All issuances of common stock, including those issued pursuant to restricted stock or unit grants, are issued from the Company’s authorized but not issued and outstanding shares.
In June 2014, the Company effectively repurchased
In January 2018, the Company issued an aggregate of
During 2018, an executive officer surrendered an aggregate of
In January 2019, the Company was obligated to issue an aggregate of
During 2019, certain employees, including executive officers, surrendered an aggregate of
On August 9, 2019, in connection with the Recapitalization Transaction (see Note 10 - Debt), the Company issued to the Investor Parties, in the aggregate,
In January 2020, the Company issued an aggregate of
During 2020, certain employees, including
In June 2020, $
In August 2020, $
In October 2020, $
In November 2020, $
In December 2020, $
No dividend was declared or paid in 2020 and 2019.
Preferred Stock
On August 9, 2019, in connection with the Recapitalization Transaction (see Note 10 - Debt), the Company issued
Each share of Series A Preferred Stock has an initial value of $
The Series A Preferred Stock has the right to receive dividends on a quarterly basis equal to
The Series A Preferred Stock has no stated maturity, however, the Company has the right to redeem all or a portion of the Series A Preferred Stock at its Liquidation Preference (as defined below) at any time after payment in full of the New Term Loan. In addition, upon the occurrence of certain change of control type events, holders of the Series A Preferred Stock are entitled to receive an amount (the “Liquidation Preference”), in preference to holders of Common Stock or other junior stock, equal to (i)
The Company has the right, but is not required, to repurchase all or a portion of the Series A Preferred Stock at its Liquidation Preference at any time after payment in full of the New Term Loan (see Note 10 - Debt). The Series A Preferred Stock does not have any voting rights, except to the extent required by the Delaware General Corporation Law, except for the exclusive right to elect the Series A Preferred Directors (as described below) and except for certain approval rights over certain transactions (as described below). These approval rights require the prior consent of specified percentages of holders (or in certain cases, all holders) of the Series A Preferred Stock in order for the Company to take certain actions, including the issuance of additional shares of Series A Preferred Stock or parity stock, the issuance of senior stock, certain amendments to the Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation, the Certificate of Designations of the Series A Preferred Stock (the “Certificate of Designations”), the Second Amended and Restated By-laws or the Amended and Restated Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee Charter, material changes in the Company’s line of business and certain change of control type transactions. In addition, the Certificate of Designations provides that the approval of at least six directors is required for any related person transaction within the meaning of Item 404 of Regulation S-K under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, including, without limitation, the adoption of, or any amendment, modification or waiver of, any agreement or arrangement related to any such transaction. The Certificate of Designations also includes restrictions on the ability of the Company to pay dividends on or make distributions with respect to, or redeem or repurchase, shares of Common Stock or other junior stock. In addition, holders of the Series A Preferred Stock have preemptive rights regarding future issuance of Series A Preferred Stock or parity stock.
In addition, the Certificate of Designations provides the holders of Series A Preferred Stock certain board representation rights. The Certificate of Designations provides, among other things, that, for so long as at least
The Series A Preferred Stock redemption amount is contingent upon certain events with no stated redemption date as of the reporting date, although may become redeemable in the future. In accordance with the SEC guidance within ASC Topic 480, Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity: Classification and Measurement of Redeemable Securities, the Company classified the Series A Preferred Stock as temporary equity as the Series A Preferred Stock contains a redemption feature which is contingent upon certain deemed liquidation events, the occurrence of which may not solely be within the control of the Company.
Under ASC 815, Derivatives and Hedging, certain contractual terms that meet the accounting definition of a derivative must be accounted for separately from the financial instrument in which they are embedded. The Company has concluded that the redemption upon a change of control and the repurchase option by the Company constitute embedded derivatives.
The embedded redemption upon a change of control must be accounted for separately from the Series A Preferred Stock. The redemption provision specifies if certain events that constitute a change of control occur, the Company may be required to settle the Series A Preferred Stock at 150% of its accreted amount. Accordingly, the redemption provision meets the definition of a derivative, and its economic characteristics are not considered clearly and closely related to the economic characteristics of the Series A Preferred Stock, which is considered more akin to a debt instrument than equity.
Accordingly, these two embedded derivatives are required to be bundled into a single derivative instrument and accounted for separately from the Series A Preferred Stock at fair value.
The Company considers the repurchase option to have no value as the likelihood is remote that this event, within the Company’s control, would ever occur. On August 9, 2019, the Company determined that the fair value of the redemption provision upon a change of control was $
As of December 31, 2020, the Series A Preferred Stock is recorded in temporary equity at the amount of accrued, but unpaid dividends of $
Note 16 — Fair Value Measurements
Fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. In determining fair value, the Company uses various methods including market, income and cost approaches. Based upon these approaches, the Company often utilizes certain assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability, including assumptions about risk and/or the risks inherent in the inputs to the valuation technique. These inputs can be readily observable, market-corroborated, or unobservable inputs. The Company utilizes valuation techniques that maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs. Based upon observable inputs used in the valuation techniques, the Company is required to provide information according to the fair value hierarchy. The fair value hierarchy ranks the quality and reliability of the information used to determine fair values into three broad levels as follows:
Level 1: |
Valuations for assets and liabilities traded in active markets from readily available pricing sources for market transactions involving identical assets or liabilities. |
Level 2: |
Valuations for assets and liabilities traded in less active dealer or broker markets. Valuations are obtained from third-party pricing services for identical or similar assets or liabilities. |
Level 3: |
Valuations incorporate certain assumptions and projections in determining the fair value assigned to such assets or liabilities. |
In instances where the determination of the fair value measurement is based upon inputs from different levels of the fair value hierarchy, the level in the fair value hierarchy within which the entire fair value measurement falls is based upon the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety. The Company’s assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement in its entirety requires judgment, and considers factors specific to the asset or liability.
The following tables summarize the Company’s financial liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of December 31, 2020 and 2019 (in thousands):
Carrying Amount as of |
Fair Value Measurements As of December 31, 2020 |
|||||||||||||||
Level 1 |
Level 2 |
Level 3 |
||||||||||||||
3.25% convertible senior notes due in 2023 |
$ | $ | $ | $ | ||||||||||||
Preferred stock derivative liability |
Carrying Amount as of |
Fair Value Measurements As of December 31, 2019 |
|||||||||||||||
Level 1 |
Level 2 |
Level 3 |
||||||||||||||
3.25% convertible senior notes due in 2023 |
$ | $ | $ | $ | ||||||||||||
Preferred stock derivative liability |
The following table provides a reconciliation of the beginning and ending balances of liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) (in thousands):
3.25% convertible senior notes due 2020 |
||||||||
2020 |
2019 |
|||||||
Balance at January 1, |
$ | $ | ||||||
Additions |
||||||||
Loss on extinguishment of convertible senior notes |
||||||||
Extinguishment of convertible senior notes |
( |
) |
||||||
Change in fair value |
||||||||
Balance at December 31, |
$ | $ |
3.25% convertible senior notes due 2023 |
||||||||
2020 |
2019 |
|||||||
Balance at January 1, |
$ | $ | ||||||
New issuance ($ |
||||||||
New issuance ($ |
||||||||
Conversion of convertible senior notes |
( |
) |
||||||
Change in fair value |
||||||||
Payment-in-kind interest |
||||||||
Balance at December 31, |
$ | $ |
Preferred stock derivative liability |
||||||||
2020 |
2019 |
|||||||
Balance at January 1, |
$ | $ | ||||||
New issuance of Series A Preferred Stock |
||||||||
Change in fair value |
||||||||
Balance at December 31, |
$ | $ |
The Company’s derivative liability is classified within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy because unobservable inputs were used in estimating the fair value. The fair value of the redemption provision embedded in the Series A Preferred Stock is estimated based on a discounted cash flow model and probability assumptions based on management’s estimates of a change of control event occurring. In subsequent periods, the derivative liability is accounted for at fair value, with changes in fair value recognized as other income (expense) on the Company's consolidated statements of operations.
In August 2017, the Company agreed with Oasis, the holder of approximately $
In connection with the Recapitalization Transaction, the Company issued (i) amended and restated notes with respect to the $21.6 million Oasis Note issued on November 7, 2017, and the $8.0 million Oasis Note issued on July 26, 2018 (together, the “Existing Oasis Notes”), and (ii) a new $8.0 million convertible senior note having the same terms as such amended and restated notes (collectively, the “3.25% 2023 Notes”). The New Oasis Notes mature 91 days after the amounts outstanding under the New Term Loan are paid in full, and in no event later than July 3, 2023, accrue interest at an annual rate of (i) 3.25% if paid in cash or
In connection with these transactions, the Company elected the fair value option of measurement for the 3.25% 2020 Notes and the 3.25% 2023 Notes, under ASC 815, Derivatives and Hedging. As a result, these notes are re-measured each reporting period using Level 3 inputs (Monte Carlo simulation model and inputs for stock price, risk-free rate and volatility), with changes in fair value reflected in current period earnings in its consolidated statements of operations.
The fair value of the
The remaining $
In connection with the Recapitalization Transaction, the Company also issued
The fair value of the New Term Loan as of December 31, 2020 and 2019 was $
The Company’s accounts receivable, accounts payable, and accrued expenses represent financial instruments. The carrying value of these financial instruments is a reasonable approximation of fair value.
Note 17—Commitments
The Company has entered into various license agreements whereby the Company may use certain characters and intellectual properties in conjunction with its products. Generally, such license agreements provide for royalties to be paid ranging from
In the event the Company estimates that a shortfall in achieving the minimum guarantee is probable, a liability is recorded for the estimated shortfall and charged to royalty expense.
Future annual minimum royalty guarantees as of December 31, 2020 are as follows (in thousands):
2021 |
$ | |||
2022 |
||||
2023 |
||||
2024 |
||||
$ |
The Company has entered into employment and consulting agreements with certain executives expiring through December 31, 2024. The aggregate future annual minimum guaranteed amounts due under those agreements as of December 31, 2020 are as follows (in thousands):
2021 |
$ | |||
2022 |
||||
2023 |
||||
2024 |
||||
$ |
Note 18—Share-Based Payments
Under the Company’s 2002 Stock Award and Incentive Plan (“the Plan”), which incorporated its Third Amended and Restated 1995 Stock Option Plan, the Company has reserved shares of its common stock for issuance upon the exercise of options granted under the Plan, as well as for the awarding of other securities. Under the Plan, employees (including officers), non-employee directors and independent consultants may be granted options to purchase shares of common stock, restricted stock units and other securities (see Note 15 - Common Stock and Preferred Stock). The vesting of these share-based awards may vary, but typically vest over a requisite service period or are based on performance criteria, with a maximum vesting period of
Restricted Stock
Under the Plan, share-based compensation payments may include the issuance of shares of restricted stock. Restricted stock award grants are based upon employment contracts, which vary by individual and year, and are subject to vesting conditions.
The following table summarizes the restricted stock award activity, annually, for the year ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018:
2020 |
2019 |
2018 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Number of Shares |
Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value |
Number of Shares |
Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value |
Number of Shares |
Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value |
|||||||||||||||||||
Outstanding, January 1 |
$ | $ | $ | |||||||||||||||||||||
Granted |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Vested |
( |
) |
( |
) |
( |
) |
||||||||||||||||||
Forfeited |
( |
) |
( |
) |
||||||||||||||||||||
Outstanding, December 31 |
As of December 31, 2020, there was $
Restricted Stock Units
Under the Plan, share-based compensation payments may include the issuance of Restricted Stock Units (RSUs) to employees, which occurs approximately once per year and are subject to vesting conditions. RSUs are valued at the market price of the shares underlying the award on the date of grant.
The following table summarizes the RSU award activity, annually for the year ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018:
2020 |
2019 |
2018 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Number of Shares |
Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value |
Number of Shares |
Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value |
Number of Shares |
Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value |
|||||||||||||||||||
Outstanding, January 1 |
$ | $ | $ | |||||||||||||||||||||
Granted |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Vested |
( |
) |
( |
) |
( |
) |
||||||||||||||||||
Forfeited |
( |
) |
( |
) |
( |
) |
||||||||||||||||||
Outstanding, December 31 |
As of December 31, 2020, there was $
Share-Based Compensation Expense
The following table summarizes the total share-based compensation expense and related tax benefits recognized (in thousands):
Year Ended December 31, |
||||||||||||
2020 |
2019 |
2018 |
||||||||||
Share-based compensation expense |
$ | $ | $ |
Note 19—Employee Benefits Plan
The Company sponsored for its U.S. employees, a defined contribution plan under Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code. The Plan provided that employees may defer up to
Note 20—Supplemental Information to Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
In 2018, an executive officer surrendered an aggregate of
In 2019, two executive officers surrendered an aggregate of
On August 9, 2019, in connection with the Recapitalization Transaction (see Note 10 - Debt), the Company issued to the Investor Parties, in the aggregate,
On August 9, 2019, in connection with the Recapitalization Transaction (see Note 10 - Debt), the Company issued
In 2020, certain employees, including
Note 21—Selected Quarterly Financial Data (Unaudited)
Selected unaudited quarterly financial data for the years 2020 and 2019 are summarized below. The Company has derived this data from the unaudited consolidated interim financial statements that, in the Company's opinion, have been prepared on substantially the same basis as the audited financial statements contained elsewhere in this report and include all normal recurring adjustments necessary for a fair presentation of the financial information for the periods presented. These unaudited quarterly results should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes thereto included elsewhere in this report. The operating results in any quarter are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for any future period.
2020 |
2019 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
First Quarter |
Second Quarter |
Third Quarter |
Fourth Quarter |
First Quarter |
Second Quarter |
Third Quarter |
Fourth Quarter |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
(in thousands, except per share data) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net sales |
$ | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gross profit |
$ | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Income (loss) from operations |
$ | ( |
) |
$ | ( |
) |
$ | $ | $ | ( |
) |
$ | ( |
) |
$ | $ | ( |
) |
||||||||||||||
Income (loss) before provision (benefit) for income taxes |
$ | ( |
) |
$ | ( |
) |
$ | $ | ( |
) |
$ | ( |
) |
$ | ( |
) |
$ | $ | ( |
) |
||||||||||||
Net income (loss) |
$ | ( |
) |
$ | ( |
) |
$ | $ | ( |
) |
$ | ( |
) |
$ | ( |
) |
$ | $ | ( |
) |
||||||||||||
Net income (loss) attributable to JAKKS Pacific, Inc. |
$ | ( |
) |
$ | ( |
) |
$ | $ | ( |
) |
$ | ( |
) |
$ | ( |
) |
$ | $ | ( |
) |
||||||||||||
Net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders |
$ | ( |
) |
$ | ( |
) |
$ | $ | ( |
) |
$ | ( |
) |
$ | ( |
) |
$ | $ | ( |
) |
||||||||||||
Basic earnings (loss) per share |
$ | ( |
) |
$ | ( |
) |
$ | $ | ( |
) |
$ | ( |
) |
$ | ( |
) |
$ | $ | ( |
) |
||||||||||||
Weighted average shares Outstanding |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Diluted earnings (loss) per share |
$ | ( |
) |
$ | ( |
) |
$ | $ | ( |
) |
$ | ( |
) |
$ | ( |
) |
$ | $ | ( |
) |
||||||||||||
Weighted average shares and equivalents outstanding |
Quarterly and year-to-date computations of income (loss) per share amounts are made independently. Therefore, the sum of the per-share amounts for the quarters may not agree with the per share amounts for the year.
Note 22 – Litigation and Contingencies
The Company is a party to, and certain of its property is the subject of, various pending claims and legal proceedings that routinely arise in the ordinary course of its business. The Company accrues for losses when the loss is deemed probable and the liability can reasonably be estimated. Where a liability is probable and there is a range of estimated loss with no best estimate in the range, the Company records the minimum estimated liability related to the claim. As additional information becomes available, the Company assesses the potential liability related to its pending litigation and revises its estimates.
A purported class action lawsuit was filed on November 10, 2020 in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware (Brown v. JAKKS Pacific, Inc. et al) alleging that the Proxy Statement issued in connection with the shareholder meeting held in June 2020 contained misstatements regarding the manner in which broker votes would be counted and that such votes were improperly included in approving the Company’s reverse stock split at the meeting. The purported class action seeks damages in an unspecified amount, alleging breach of fiduciary duties by the Company’s directors. The Company intends to vigorously defend the lawsuit. Since the action was recently commenced, however, we cannot assure you of its outcome and cannot estimate the range of any potential damage award. The Company is taking steps to hold a Special Meeting of the Shareholders on April 30, 2021 to obtain shareholder ratification of the filing of the Certificate of Amendment to its Certificate of Incorporation effecting the reverse split, in accordance with ratification procedures under Delaware law, and if ratified, to then seek settlement and dismissal of the lawsuit.
In the normal course of business, the Company may provide certain indemnifications and/or other commitments of varying scope to a) its licensors, customers and certain other parties, including against third-party claims of intellectual property infringement, and b) its officers, directors and employees, including against third-party claims regarding the periods in which they serve in such capacities with the Company. The duration and amount of such obligations is, in certain cases, indefinite. The Company's director’s and officer’s liability insurance policy may, however, enable it to recover a portion of any future payments related to its officer, director or employee indemnifications. For the past five years, costs related to director and officer indemnifications have not been significant. Other than certain liabilities recorded in the normal course of business related to royalty payments due the Company's licensors, no liabilities have been recorded for indemnifications and/or other commitments.
Note 23 — Subsequent Event
On February 5, 2021, Benefit Street Partners and Oasis Investment II Master Funds Ltd, both related parties, entered into a purchase and sale agreement wherein Benefit Street Partners purchased $
On March 2, 2021, $
JAKKS PACIFIC, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
SCHEDULE II—VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018
Allowances are deducted from the assets to which they apply, except for sales returns and allowances.
Balance at Beginning of Period |
Charged to Costs and Expenses |
Net Deductions and other |
Balance at End of Period |
|||||||||||||
(In thousands) |
||||||||||||||||
Year ended December 31, 2020: |
||||||||||||||||
Allowance for: |
||||||||||||||||
Uncollectible accounts |
$ | $ | $ | ( |
) |
$ | ||||||||||
Reserve for sales returns and allowances |
( |
) |
||||||||||||||
$ | $ | $ | ( |
) |
$ | |||||||||||
Year ended December 31, 2019: |
||||||||||||||||
Allowance for: |
||||||||||||||||
Uncollectible accounts |
$ | $ | $ | $ | ||||||||||||
Reserve for sales returns and allowances |
( |
) |
||||||||||||||
$ | $ | $ | ( |
) |
$ | |||||||||||
Year ended December 31, 2018: |
||||||||||||||||
Allowance for: |
||||||||||||||||
Uncollectible accounts |
$ | $ | $ | ( |
) |
$ | ||||||||||
Reserve for sales returns and allowances |
( |
) |
||||||||||||||
$ | $ | $ | ( |
) |
$ |
Item 9A. Controls and Procedures
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures.
Our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, after evaluating the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) as of the end of the period covered by this Annual Report, have concluded that as of December 31, 2020, our disclosure controls and procedures were adequate and effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports we file or submit with the Securities and Exchange Commission is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting.
There has been no change in our internal control over financial reporting identified in connection with the evaluation required by Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(d) and 15d-15 that occurred during the fourth quarter period covered by this Annual Report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting.
We, as management, are responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate “internal control over financial reporting” (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f)). Our internal control system was designed by or is under the supervision of management and our board of directors to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of published financial statements.
All internal control systems, no matter how well designed, have inherent limitations. Therefore, even those systems determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and presentation.
Our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2020. In making this assessment, management used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013). We believe that, as of December 31, 2020, our internal control over financial reporting was effective based upon those criteria.
PART III
Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
Directors and Executive Officers
Our Directors and executive officers are as follows:
Name |
Age |
Positions with the Company |
||
Stephen G. Berman |
56 |
Chairman, Chief Executive Officer, President, Secretary and Director |
||
John L. Kimble |
51 |
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
||
John J. McGrath |
55 |
Chief Operating Officer |
||
Alexander Shoghi |
39 |
Director |
||
Zhao Xiaoqiang |
53 |
Director |
||
Andrew Axelrod |
37 |
Director |
||
Matthew Winkler |
39 |
Director |
||
Joshua Cascade |
47 |
Director |
||
Carole Levine |
63 |
Director |
Stephen G. Berman has been our Chief Operating Officer (until August 23, 2011) and Secretary and one of our Directors since co-founding JAKKS in January 1995. From February 17, 2009 through March 31, 2010 he was also our Co-Chief Executive Officer and has been our Chief Executive Officer since April 1, 2010. Since January 1, 1999, he has also served as our President, and since October 23, 2015 he has also served as our Chairman. From the Company’s inception until December 31, 1998, Mr. Berman was also our Executive Vice President. From October 1991 to August 1995, Mr. Berman was a Vice President and Managing Director of THQ International, Inc., a subsidiary of THQ. From 1988 to 1991, he was President and an owner of Balanced Approach, Inc., a distributor of personal fitness products and services.
Alexander Shoghi has been a Director since December 18, 2015. Mr. Shoghi is a Portfolio Manager at Oasis Management, a private investment management firm headquartered in Hong Kong. Mr. Shoghi joined Oasis in 2005, first based in Hong Kong, and subsequently relocating to the U.S. as the founder and manager of Oasis Capital in Austin, Texas in early 2012. From 2004 to 2005, Mr. Shoghi worked at Lehman Brothers in New York City. Mr. Shoghi holds a Bachelor of Science of Business Administration in Finance and International Business degree from Georgetown University.
Zhao Xiaoqiang has been a Director since April 27, 2017. Since 2002 Mr. Zhao has been the Chairman of Meisheng Holding Co., a private holding company selling cultural products, and since 2007 he has been the Chairman of Meisheng Culture & Creative Corp. Ltd., a public company (listed on the Shenzhen Stock Exchange in 2012) with 25 subsidiaries in the areas of manufacturing, animation, games, movies, online video, stage performance art, e-commerce and overseas investments. Mr. Zhao is also a director of two of the Company’s subsidiaries, JAKKS Meisheng Animation (H.K.) Limited and JAKKS Meisheng Trading (Shanghai) Limited. Mr. Zhao holds an EMBA from Zhejiang University.
Andrew Axelrod is the Managing Partner and Portfolio Manager of Axar Capital Management LP, an investment management firm that he founded in April 2015. Before founding Axar Capital Management, Mr. Axelrod worked at Mount Kellett Capital Management LP, a private equity investment firm, from 2009 to 2014. At Mount Kellett Capital Management, he was promoted to Co-Head of North America Investments in 2011 and became a Partner in 2013. Prior to joining Mount Kellett Capital Management, Mr. Axelrod worked at Kohlberg Kravis Roberts & Co. L.P. from 2007 to 2008 and The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. from 2005 to 2006. Mr. Axelrod has served as chairman of the board of directors of Livestyle Holdings LLC since December 2016, Terra Capital Partners since February 2018 and StoneMor Partners LP (NYSE: STON) since June 2019. Mr. Axelrod graduated magna cum laude from Duke University with a Bachelor of Science degree in Economics.
Matthew Winkler is currently a Managing Director at Benefit Street Partners (“BSP”), a leading credit-focused alternative asset management firm with approximately $27 billion in assets under management. BSP is a wholly owned subsidiary of Franklin Resources, Inc. that, together with its various subsidiaries, operates as Franklin Templeton. Mr. Winkler joined Benefit Street Partners in July 2014. Prior thereto, from November 2009 to March 2014, he worked in the Special Assets Group at Goldman Sachs. From July 2003 to November 2009, Mr. Winkler held analyst positions at different firms, focusing on areas such as special situations, distressed debt, and mergers and acquisitions. He holds a Bachelor of Arts in Public and Private Sector Organization from Brown University.
Joshua Cascade is a private equity investor with over two decades of private equity experience. From 2014 to 2018 he was a Managing Partner at Wellspring Capital Management, an American private equity firm focused on leveraged buyout investments in middle-market companies, where he previously served as a Partner from 2007 to 2014 and a Principal from 2002 to 2006. As a Managing Partner, he was one of five individuals responsible for firm management. From 1998 to 2002, he was an associate at Odyssey Investment Partners. From 1994 to 1998 he was an Analyst (1994-1996) and an Associate (1996-1998) at The Blackstone Group. Mr. Cascade also teaches a course on leveraged buyouts at Yale School of Management and University of Michigan, Ross School of Business and is a frequent MBA lecturer at numerous institutions. Mr. Cascade graduated with highest distinction from the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, with a Bachelor of Arts degree in Business Administration.
Carole Levine is currently a Consumer Products Marketing & Sales Consultant, where she works with clients in a range of industries, including toy manufacturing, entertainment, and food and beverage. From 1994 to 2017, she held a number of positions at Mattel, Inc., an American multinational toy manufacturing company, including Vice President, Sales, Mattel & Fisher-Price Emerging Channels (from 2005 to 2012), Vice President, Global Marketing (from 2012 to 2015), Vice President, Interim General Manager, RoseArt (from 2015 to 2017) and Vice President, Retail Business Development - Mattel Consumer Products (from 2015 to 2017). She has also been the Co-Chairman of the Children Affected by AIDS Foundation, Los Angeles for over 10 years and a member of the Licensing Industry Marketing Association. She holds a Bachelor of Arts degree in Sociology from the University of Colorado, Boulder and participated in the Accelerated Executive Marketing Program at Northwestern University’s Kellogg School of Business.
Classification of Directors
In November 2019, our stockholders approved the Company’s Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation, which divided the Board of Directors into three classes, as nearly equal in number as possible with one class standing for election each year for a three-year term. At our 2020 Annual Meeting we elected directors pursuant to a class system, directors in Class I were elected to a one-year term and directors in Class II were elected to a two-year term. The directors in Class III were designated and identified in the Certificate of Designations with their initial terms expiring at the annual meeting of our stockholders to be held in 2023, and thereafter the directors in Class III will be elected to a three-year term solely by the holders of our Series A Senior Preferred Stock and the common stockholders have no right to vote with respect to the election of such Class III directors. At each Annual Meeting of Stockholders following the 2020 Annual Meeting the successors of the class of directors whose term expires shall be elected to hold office for a term expiring at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held in the third year following the year of their election, with each director in each such class to hold office until his or her successor is duly elected and qualified.
Pursuant to our Second Amended and Restated By-laws, vacancies on our Board of Directors may only be filled as follows: (i) any vacancy in our Board of Directors relating to a Common Director (Messrs. Berman, Zhao and Shoghi) may be filled by the vote of a majority of the remaining directors then in office, although less than a quorum, or by the sole remaining director; (ii) any vacancy in our Board of Directors relating to a New Independent Common Director (Ms. Levine and Mr. Cascade) may be filled by the vote of a majority of the remaining directors then in office, although less than a quorum, or by the sole remaining director, in each case, solely in accordance with the recommendation of the Nominating Committee, with an individual selected by the Nominating Committee from the Preapproved List (as defined in the Nominating Committee Charter); and (iii) any vacancy in our Board of Directors relating to a Series A Preferred Director (Messrs. Axelrod and Winkler) may be filled by the vote of a majority of the remaining directors then in office, although less than a quorum, or by the sole remaining director, in each case, solely with an individual selected by the Required Preferred Holders (as defined in the Nominating Committee Charter). Any such director elected in accordance with our Second Amended and Restated By-laws to fill a vacancy on our Board of Directors will serve in accordance with our Second Amended and Restated By-laws until the next election of the class for which such director shall have been chosen and until his or her successor is elected and qualified or until his or her earlier death, disability, retirement, resignation or removal.
Messrs. Berman and Zhao are Class I Directors, Messrs. Shoghi and Cascade, and Ms. Levine are Class II Directors, and Messrs. Axelrod and Winkler are Class III Directors.
Qualifications for All Directors
In considering potential candidates for election to the Board, and subject to the exclusive right of holders of Series A Senior Preferred Stock to elect the Class III Directors and the terms of our Second Amended and Restated By-Laws and the Nominating Committee Charter, the Nominating Committee observes the following guidelines, among other considerations: (i) the Board must include a majority of independent directors; (ii) each candidate shall be selected without regard to age, sex, race, religion or national origin; (iii) each candidate should have the highest level of personal and professional ethics and integrity and have the ability to work well with others; (iv) each candidate should only be involved in activities or interests that do not conflict or interfere with the proper performance of the responsibilities of a director; (v) each candidate should possess substantial and significant experience that would be of particular importance to the Company in the performance of the duties of a director; and (vi) each candidate should have sufficient time available, and a willingness to devote the necessary time, to the affairs of the Company in order to carry out the responsibilities of a director, including, without limitation, consistent attendance at board and committee meetings and advance review of board and committee materials. The Chief Executive Officer will then interview such candidate. The Nominating Committee then determines whether to recommend to the Board that a candidate be nominated for approval by the Company’s stockholders. The manner in which the Nominating Committee evaluates a potential candidate does not differ based on whether the candidate is recommended by a stockholder of the Company. With respect to nominating existing directors, the Nominating Committee reviews relevant information available to it, including the most recent individual director evaluations for such candidates, the number of meetings attended, his or her level of participation, biographical information, professional qualifications and overall contributions to the Company.
In addition, effective as of August 9, 2019, the Nominating Committee Charter provides, among other things, that (i) the Nominating Committee has exclusive authority, on the terms set forth therein, to select nominees to stand for election as the New Independent Common Directors and persons to fill vacancies in the New Independent Common Directors; (ii) that the Nominating Committee will continue to nominate Mr. Cascade and Ms. Levine until no shares of Series A Senior Preferred Stock are outstanding or their earlier death, disability, retirement, resignation or removal; and (iii) that any future replacements for the New Independent Common Directors (or their successors) will be selected by the Nominating Committee from a list of preapproved persons as further described in such Charter.
The Board does not have a specific diversity policy, but considers diversity of race, ethnicity, gender, age, cultural background and professional experiences in evaluating candidates for board membership.
The Board has identified the following qualifications, attributes, experience and skills that are important to be represented on the Board as a whole: (i) management, leadership and strategic vision; (ii) financial expertise; (iii) marketing and consumer experience; and (iv) capital management.
The Board has determined that five of seven directors who serve on the Board as of the date hereof (Messrs. Axelrod, Cascade, Shoghi and Winkler and Ms. Levine) are “independent,” as defined under the applicable rules of Nasdaq. In making this determination, the Board or the Nominating Committee, as applicable, considered the standards of independence under the applicable rules of Nasdaq and all relevant facts and circumstances (including, without limitation, commercial, industrial, banking, consulting, legal, accounting, charitable and familial relationships) to ascertain whether any such person had a relationship that, in its opinion, would interfere with the exercise of independent judgment in carrying out the responsibilities of a director.
Our directors serve in accordance with the Second Amended and Restated By-laws until their respective successors are elected and qualified or until their earlier death, disability, retirement, resignation or removal. Our officers are elected annually by the Board and serve at its discretion. None of our current independent directors has served as such for more than the past five years. Our current independent directors were selected for their experience as businesspeople (Ms. Levine) and financial management expertise (Messrs. Axelrod, Cascade, Shoghi and Winkler). We believe that the Board is best served by benefiting from this blend of business and financial expertise and experience. Our remaining directors consist of our Chief Executive Officer (Mr. Berman), who brings management’s perspective to the Board’s deliberations, and Mr. Zhao, who contributes his business experience, including experience in manufacturing and his experience with Chinese markets, to the Board.
California recently passed a law which requires publicly held companies headquartered in the state (such as the Company) to include board members from underrepresented communities. The action follows passage of a similar law in 2018 mandating that public companies headquartered in the state have at least one woman on their board of directors by the end of 2019, with further future increases required depending on board size. The new law requires that by the end of 2021 California-headquartered public companies have at least one director on their board who is from an underrepresented community, defined as “an individual who self‑identifies as Black, African American, Hispanic, Latino, Asian, Pacific Islander, Native American, Native Hawaiian, or Alaska Native, or who self‑identifies as gay, lesbian, bisexual, or transgender.” In addition to that initial 2021 requirement, the law mandates that the number of directors from underrepresented communities be increased by the end of calendar year 2022, depending on the size of the board. The Company is currently in compliance with both laws, but the Board will have to take further action in order to be in compliance in 2022.
In October 2019 and February 2020, Mr. Zhao Xiaoqiang was issued a warning by the Zhejiang Securities Regulatory Bureau of the China Securities Regulatory Commission and a “public condemnation” by the Shenzhen Stock Exchange, respectively, primarily due to his failure to fulfill his duties (as a director, controlling shareholder and de facto controller of Meisheng Cultural & Creative Co. Ltd. (“Meisheng Cultural”) diligently to cause Meisheng Cultural to comply with applicable PRC regulations and stock exchange rules relating to disclosure and internal control, as well as the use of funds of Meisheng Cultural by Meisheng Holdings Group Co., Ltd. (“Meisheng Holdings”), an affiliate of Mr. Zhao and the controlling shareholder of Meisheng Cultural, without proper authorization. In addition, Mr. Zhao and Meisheng Cultural were also requested to strengthen the study of relevant laws and regulations, establish and improve the strict implementation of financial and accounting management systems of Meisheng Cultural, improve Meisheng Cultural’s internal controls, proper governance and quality of information disclosure. Other than the misuse of funds by his affiliate Meisheng Holdings, Mr. Zhao was punished as a result of activities of Meisheng Cultural as he bears certain statutory responsibilities under the applicable PRC regulations and stock exchange rules as its de facto controller and Chairman of the board of directors. Mr. Zhao has advised the Company that the aforementioned matters have nothing to do with his activities as a director of the Company, have all been ratified by Meisheng Cultural, and the related misused funds have been fully repaid by Meisheng Holdings.
Committees of the Board of Directors
We have an Audit Committee, a Compensation Committee and a Nominating Committee. In connection with the Recapitalization, the Capital Allocation Committee, which was established as a standing committee in February 2016, has been dissolved.
Audit Committee. In addition to risk management functions, the primary functions of the Audit Committee are to select or to recommend to the Board the selection of outside auditors; to monitor our relationships with our outside auditors and their interaction with our management in order to ensure their independence and objectivity; to review and assess the scope and quality of our outside auditor’s services, including the audit of our annual financial statements; to review our financial management and accounting procedures; to review our financial statements with our management and outside auditors; and to review the adequacy of our system of internal accounting controls. Effective as of their respective dates of appointment to the Board, Messrs. Shoghi (Chair) and Winkler and Ms. Levine are the members of the Audit Committee. Each member of the Audit Committee is “independent” (as defined in NASD Rule 4200(a)(14)) and able to read and understand fundamental financial statements. Mr. Shoghi, our audit committee financial expert, possesses the financial expertise required under Rule 401(h) of Regulation S-K under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), and NASD Rule 4350(d)(2) as a result of his experience as a portfolio manager at Oasis Management. He is further “independent” as defined under Item 7(d)(3)(iv) of Schedule 14A under the Exchange Act. We will, in the future, continue to have (i) an Audit Committee of at least three members comprised solely of independent directors, each of whom will be able to read and understand fundamental financial statements (or will become able to do so within a reasonable period of time after his or her appointment); and (ii) at least one member of the Audit Committee who will possess the financial expertise required under NASD Rule 4350(d)(2). The Board has adopted a written charter for the Audit Committee, which reviews and reassesses the adequacy of that charter on an annual basis. The full text of the charter is available on our website at www.jakks.com.
Compensation Committee. In addition to risk oversight functions, the Compensation Committee makes recommendations to the Board regarding compensation of management employees and administers plans and programs relating to employee benefits, incentives, compensation and awards under the 2002 Stock Award and Incentive Plan (the “2002 Plan”). Messrs. Axelrod (Chair), Winkler and Shoghi are the members of the Compensation Committee. The Board has determined that each of them is “independent,” as defined under the applicable rules of Nasdaq. A copy of the Compensation Committee’s Charter is available on our website at www.jakks.com. Executive officers that are members of the Board make recommendations to the Compensation Committee with respect to the compensation of other executive officers who are not on the Board. Except as otherwise prohibited, the Compensation Committee may delegate its responsibilities to subcommittees or individuals. The Compensation Committee has the authority, in its sole discretion, to retain or obtain advice from a compensation consultant, legal counsel or other advisor and is directly responsible for the appointment, compensation and oversight of such persons. The Company provides the appropriate funding to such persons as determined by the Compensation Committee, which also conducts an independence assessment of its outside advisors using the six factors contained in Exchange Act Rule 10C-1. The Compensation Committee receives legal advice from our outside general counsel and has retained Willis Towers Watson (“WTW”), a compensation consulting firm, to directly advise the Compensation Committee from time to time.
The Compensation Committee also annually reviews the overall compensation of our executive officers to determine whether discretionary bonuses should be granted. In 2015, Lipis Consulting, Inc. (“LCI”), a compensation consulting firm, presented a report to the Compensation Committee comparing our performance, size and executive compensation levels to those of peer group companies. LCI also reviewed with the Compensation Committee the base salaries, annual bonuses, total cash compensation, long-term compensation and total compensation of our senior executive officers relative to those companies. The performance comparison presented to the Compensation Committee each year includes a comparison of our total shareholder return, earnings per share growth, sales, net income (and one-year growth of both measures) to the peer group companies. The Compensation Committee reviews this information along with details about the components of each executive officer’s compensation.
A compensation consultant was not consulted during 2020.
Nominating Committee. In addition to risk oversight functions, the Nominating Committee develops our corporate governance system and reviews proposed new members of the Board, including those recommended by our stockholders. Messrs. Winkler (Chair), Axelrod and Cascade are the members of the Nominating Committee, which operates pursuant to a written charter adopted by the Board, the full text of which is available on our website at www.jakks.com. The Board has determined that each member of the Nominating Committee is “independent,” as defined under the applicable rules of Nasdaq.
The Nominating Committee will annually review the composition of the Board and the ability of its current members to continue effectively as directors for the upcoming fiscal year. The Nominating Committee established the position of Chairman of the Board in 2015. In the ordinary course, absent special circumstances or a change in the criteria for Board membership, and subject to the exclusive right of holders of Series A Senior Preferred Stock to elect the Series A Preferred Directors, the Nominating Committee will re-nominate incumbent directors who continue to be qualified for Board service and are willing to continue as directors. If the Nominating Committee thinks it is in the Company’s best interests to nominate a new individual for director in connection with an annual meeting of stockholders, or if a vacancy on the Board occurs between annual stockholder meetings or an incumbent director chooses not to run, and subject to the exclusive right of holders of Series A Senior Preferred Stock to elect the Series A Preferred Directors, and the terms of the Second Amended and Restated By-Laws and Nominating Committee Charter, the Nominating Committee will seek out potential candidates for Board appointment who meet the criteria for selection as a nominee and have the specific qualities or skills being sought. Except as described below with respect to the New Independent Common Directors, and subject to the exclusive right of holders of Series A Senior Preferred Stock to elect the Series A Preferred Directors, and the terms of the Second Amended and Restated By-Laws and Nominating Committee Charter, director candidates will be selected based on input from members of the Board, our senior management and, if the Nominating Committee deems appropriate, a third-party search firm. The Nominating Committee will evaluate each candidate’s qualifications and check relevant references, and each candidate will be interviewed by at least one member of the Nominating Committee. Candidates meriting serious consideration will meet with all members of the Board. Based on this input, the Nominating Committee will evaluate whether a prospective candidate is qualified to serve as a director and whether the Nominating Committee should recommend to the Board that this candidate be appointed to fill a current vacancy on the Board, or be presented for the approval of the stockholders, as appropriate.
In addition, effective as of the closing date of the Recapitalization, the Amended and Restated Nominating Committee Charter provides, among other things, that (i) the Nominating Committee has exclusive authority, on the terms set forth therein, to select nominees to stand for election as the New Independent Common Directors and persons to fill vacancies in the New Independent Common Directors; (ii) that the Nominating Committee will continue to nominate Mr. Cascade and Ms. Levine until no shares of Series A Senior Preferred Stock are outstanding or their earlier death, disability, retirement, resignation or removal; and (iii) that any future replacements for the New Independent Common Directors (or their successors) will be selected by the Nominating Committee from the Preapproved List (as defined in the Nominating Committee Charter).
Stockholder recommendations for director nominees are welcome and should be sent to our Chief Financial Officer, who will forward such recommendations to the Nominating Committee, and should include the following information: (a) all information relating to each nominee that is required to be disclosed pursuant to Regulation 14A under the Exchange Act (including such person’s written consent to being named in the proxy statement as a nominee and to serving as a director if elected); (b) the names and addresses of the stockholders making the nomination and the number of shares of Common Stock which are owned beneficially and of record by such stockholders; and (c) appropriate biographical information and a statement as to the qualification of each nominee, all of which must be submitted in the time frame described under the appropriate caption in our proxy statement. The Nominating Committee will evaluate candidates recommended by stockholders in the same manner as candidates recommended by other sources, using additional criteria, if any, approved by the Board from time to time. Our stockholder communication policy may be amended at any time with the Nominating Committee’s consent.
Pursuant to the Director Resignation Policy adopted by the Board following our 2014 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, if a nominee for director in an uncontested election receives less than a majority of the votes cast, the director must submit his resignation to the Board. The Nominating Committee then considers such resignation and makes a recommendation to the Board concerning the acceptance or rejection of such resignation. This procedure was implemented following our 2016 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.
Special Committees. In addition to the above described standing committees, the Board establishes special committees as it deems warranted.
Executive Officers
Our executive officers are elected by our Board of Directors and serve pursuant to the terms of their respective employment agreements. One of our executive officers, Stephen G. Berman, is also a Director of the Company. See above for biographical information about this officer. The other current executive officers are John L. Kimble, our Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer and John (Jack) McGrath, our Chief Operating Officer.
John J. (Jack) McGrath has served as our Chief Operating Officer since 2011 and is responsible for the Company’s global operations. He brings more than 24 years of experience, having served as our Executive Vice President of Operations from December 2007 until August 2011 when he became our Chief Operating Officer. Mr. McGrath was our Vice President of Marketing from 1999 to August 2003 and Senior Vice President of Operations until 2007. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. McGrath was a Brand Marketer for Hot Wheels® at Mattel Inc. and part of its Asia Pacific marketing team. Mr. McGrath served honorably in the U.S. Army and holds a Bachelor of Science degree in Marketing.
John L. Kimble became our Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer on November 20, 2019.
Mr. Kimble worked for over 12 years at various positions at The Walt Disney Company, ultimately as VP/Finance, Strategy, Operations and Business Development. More recently, Mr. Kimble spent six years at Mattel, Inc. where he served in various positions and concluded his career there as VP/Head of Corporate Development - Licensing Acquisitions - M&A. In between his service at Disney and Mattel, he spent a couple of years as an entrepreneur at a start-up gaming company. He began his career as a consultant for Mars & Co., a global strategy consulting firm. Mr. Kimble received his Bachelor’s Degree in Management Science, Concentration in Finance, Minor in Economics from the Sloan School, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (M.I.T.) and has a Master of Business Administration (MBA) from the Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania.
Joel M. Bennett was our Executive Vice President (from May 2000) and our Chief Financial Officer (from September 1995) until his departure in March 2018. Brent T. Novak was our Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer from April 1, 2018 until December 6, 2019.
Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance
Based solely upon a review of Forms 3, 4 and 5 and amendments thereto furnished to us during and for 2020, all Forms 3, 4 and 5 required to be filed during 2020 by our Directors and executive officers were timely filed.
Stockholder Communications
Stockholders interested in communicating with the Board may do so by writing to any or all directors, care of our Chief Financial Officer, at our principal executive offices. Our Chief Financial Officer will log in all stockholder correspondence and forward to the director addressee(s) all communications that, in his judgment, are appropriate for consideration by the directors. Any director may review the correspondence log and request copies of any correspondence. Examples of communications that would be considered inappropriate for consideration by the directors include, but are not limited to, commercial solicitations, trivial, obscene, or profane items, administrative matters, ordinary business matters, or personal grievances. Correspondence that is not appropriate for Board review will be handled by our Chief Financial Officer. All appropriate matters pertaining to accounting or internal controls will be brought promptly to the attention of our Audit Committee Chair.
Stockholder recommendations for director nominees are welcome and should be sent to our Chief Financial Officer, who will forward such recommendations to the Nominating Committee, and should include the following information: (a) all information relating to each nominee that is required to be disclosed pursuant to Regulation 14A under the Exchange Act (including such person’s written consent to being named in the proxy statement as a nominee and to serving as a director if elected); (b) the names and addresses of the stockholders making the nomination and the number of shares of Common Stock which are owned beneficially and of record by such stockholders; and (c) appropriate biographical information and a statement as to the qualification of each nominee, and must be submitted in the time frame described under the caption, “Stockholder Proposals for 2021 Annual Meeting,” in our Proxy Statement for the 2020 Annual Meeting. The Nominating Committee will evaluate candidates recommended by stockholders in the same manner as candidates recommended by other sources, using additional criteria, if any, approved by the Board from time to time. Our stockholder communication policy may be amended at any time with the consent of the Nominating Committee.
Code of Ethics
We have a Code of Ethics (which we call a Code of Conduct) that applies to all our employees, officers and directors. This Code was filed as an exhibit to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003. We have posted on our website, www.jakks.com, the full text of such Code. We will disclose when there have been waivers of, or amendments to, such Code, as required by the rules and regulations promulgated by the SEC and/or Nasdaq.
Pursuant to our Code of Conduct, all of our employees are required to disclose to our General Counsel, the Board or any committee established by the Board to receive such information, any material transaction or relationship that reasonably could be expected to give rise to actual or apparent conflicts of interest between any of them, personally, and the Company. Our Code of Conduct also directs all employees to avoid any self-interested transactions without full disclosure. This policy, which applies to all of our employees, is reiterated in our Employee Handbook which states that a violation of this policy could be grounds for termination. In approving or rejecting a proposed transaction, our General Counsel, the Board or a designated committee of the Board will consider the facts and circumstances available and deemed relevant, including, but not limited to, the risks, costs and benefits to us, the terms of the transactions, the availability of other sources for comparable services or products, and, if applicable, the impact on director independence. Upon concluding their review, they will only approve those agreements that, in light of known circumstances, are in or are not inconsistent with, our best interests, as they determine in good faith.
Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation
No member of the Compensation Committee during the last fiscal year was or previously had been an executive officer or employee of ours, or was party to any related person transaction within the meaning of Item 404 of Regulation S-K under the Securities Act. None of our executive officers has served as a director or member of a compensation committee (or other board committee performing equivalent functions) of any other entity, one of whose executive officers served as a director or a member of the Compensation Committee.
Item 11. Executive Compensation
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
We believe that a strong management team comprised of highly talented individuals in key positions is critical to our ability to deliver sustained growth and profitability, and our executive compensation program is an important tool for attracting and retaining such individuals. We also believe that our people are our most important resource. While some companies may enjoy an exclusive or limited franchise or are able to exploit unique assets or proprietary technology, we depend fundamentally on the skills, energy and dedication of our employees to drive our business. It is only through their constant efforts that we are able to innovate through the creation of new products and the continual rejuvenation of our product lines, to maintain operating efficiencies, and to develop and exploit marketing channels. With this in mind, we have consistently sought to employ the most talented, accomplished and energetic people available in the industry. Therefore, we believe it is vital that our named executive officers receive an aggregate compensation package that is both highly competitive with the compensation received by similarly-situated executive officers at peer group companies, and also reflective of each individual named executive officer’s contributions to our success on both a long-term and short-term basis. As discussed in greater depth below, the objectives of our compensation program are designed to execute this philosophy by compensating our executives at the top quartile of their peers.
Our executive compensation program is designed with three main objectives:
● |
to offer a competitive total compensation opportunity that will allow us to continue to retain and motivate highly talented individuals to fill key positions; |
● |
to align a significant portion of each executive’s total compensation with our annual performance and the interests of our stockholders; and |
● |
reflect the qualifications, skills, experience and responsibilities of our executives. |
Administration and Process
Our executive compensation program is administered by the Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee receives legal advice from our outside general counsel and in previous years has retained a compensation consulting firm, such as Willis Towers Watson (“WTW”) and Lipis Consulting, Inc. (“LCI”), which provides advice directly to the Compensation Committee. Historically, the base salary, bonus structure and long-term equity compensation of our executive officers are governed by the terms of their individual employment agreements (see “Employment Agreements and Termination of Employment Arrangements”) and we expect that to continue in the future. With respect to our chief executive officer and president and our chief operating officer, the Compensation Committee, with input from WTW, establishes target performance levels for incentive bonuses based on a number of factors that are designed to further our executive compensation objectives, including our performance, the compensation received by similarly-situated executive officers at peer group companies, the conditions of the markets in which we operate and the relative earnings performance of peer group companies. The chief financial officer also received a bonus based upon performance criteria established by the Compensation Committee.
Historically, factors given considerable weight in establishing bonus performance criteria are Net Sales, Adjusted EPS, which is the net income per share of our common stock calculated on a fully-diluted basis in accordance with GAAP, and Adjusted EBITDA applied on a basis consistent with past periods, as adjusted in the sole discretion of the Compensation Committee to take account of extraordinary or special items.
As explained in greater detail below (see “Employment Agreements and Termination of Employment Arrangements”), on June 7, 2016 we further amended Mr. Berman’s employment agreement to provide, among other things, for (i) extension of the term to December 31, 2020; (ii) modification of the performance and vesting standards for each $3.5 million Annual Restricted Stock Grant (“Berman Annual Stock Grant”) provided for under Section 3(b) of his Employment Agreement, effective as of January 1, 2017, so that 40% ($1.4 million) of each Berman Annual Stock Grant will be subject to time vesting in four equal annual installments over four years and 60% ($2.1 million) of each Berman Annual Stock Grant will be subject to three year “cliff vesting” (i.e. payment is based upon performance at the close of the three year performance period), with vesting of each Berman Annual Stock Grant determined by the following performance measures: (a) total shareholder return as compared to the Russell 2000 Index (weighted 50%), (b) net revenue growth as compared to our peer group (weighted 25%) and (c) EBITDA growth as compared to our peer group (weighted 25%); and (iii) modification of the performance measures for award of his Annual Performance Bonus equal to up to 300% of Base Salary (“Berman Annual Bonus”) provided for under Section 3(d) of his Employment Agreement, effective as of January 1, 2017, so that the performance measures will be based only upon net revenues and EBITDA, with each performance measure weighted 50%, and with the specific performance criteria applicable to each Berman Annual Bonus determined by the Compensation Committee during the first quarter of each fiscal year; and (iv) increase Mr. Berman’s base salary to $1,450,000 effective June 1, 2016 subject to annual increases of at least $25,000 per year thereafter.
On August 9, 2019, we further amended Mr. Berman’s Employment Agreement as follows: (i) increase of Mr. Berman’s Base Salary to $1,700,000, effective immediately; (ii) addition of a 2020 performance bonus opportunity in a range between twenty-five percent (25%) and three hundred percent (300%) of Base Salary, based upon the level of EBITDA achieved by the Company for the fiscal year, as determined by the Compensation Committee, and subject to additional terms and conditions as set forth therein; (iii) addition of a special sale transaction bonus equal to $1,000,000 if the Company enters into and consummates a Sale Transaction on or before February 15, 2020, subject to additional terms and conditions as set forth therein; modification of the Berman Annual Stock Grant provided for under section 3(b) of the Employment Agreement, effective as of January 2020, so that the number of shares of Restricted Stock granted pursuant to the Berman Annual Stock Grant equal the lesser of (a) $3,500,000 in value (based on the closing price of a share of Common Stock on December 31, 2019), or (b) 1.5% of outstanding shares of Common Stock, which shall vest in four equal installments on each anniversary of grant; (v) waiver of certain “Change of Control”, Liquidity Event, and other provisions under the Employment Agreement with respect to certain Specified Transactions; and (vi) modification of the definition of “Good Reason Event” to include a change in membership of the Board such that following such change, a majority of the directors are not Continuing Directors. All capitalized terms used but not defined in the previous sentence have the meanings ascribed thereto in the Employment Agreement, as amended by the third amendment.
On November 18, 2019, we further amended Mr. Berman’s Employment Agreement as follows: (i) to extend the term of the Employment Agreement for an additional year through December 31, 2021; (ii) addition of a 2021 performance bonus opportunity in a range between twenty-five percent (25%) and three hundred percent (300%) of Base Salary, based upon the level of EBITDA achieved by the Company for the fiscal year, as determined by the Compensation Committee, which shall be payable in cash and is subject to additional terms and conditions as set forth therein; (iii) modification of the Berman Annual Stock Grant provided for under section 3(b) of the Employment Agreement, effective as of January 2020, so that the number of shares of Restricted Stock granted pursuant to the Berman Annual Stock Grant equal the lesser of (a) $3,500,000 in value (based on the closing price of a share of Common Stock on the last business day of the prior year), or (b) 1.5% of outstanding shares of Common Stock, which shall vest in four equal installments on each anniversary of grant, provided, that no such award under (a) or (b) above shall be made to Executive (and no cash substitute shall be provided to Executive) to the extent shares are not available for grant under the Company’s 2002 Plan as of such date; and, provided, further, that we shall not be obligated to amend the 2002 Plan and/or seek shareholder approval of any amendment to increase the amount of available shares under the 2002 Plan. All capitalized terms used but not defined in the previous sentence have the meanings ascribed thereto in the Employment Agreement, as amended by the fourth amendment.
On February 18, 2021, we further amended Mr. Berman’s Employment Agreement as follows: (i) extension of the Term of the Employment Agreement for an additional three years through December 31, 2024; (ii) addition of a performance bonus opportunity for 2022 – 2024 in a range between twenty-five percent (25%) and three hundred percent (300%) of Base Salary, based upon the level of EBITDA achieved by the Company for the fiscal year, as determined by the Compensation Committee, which shall be payable in cash and is subject to additional terms and conditions as set forth therein; and (iii) modification of the Annual Restricted Stock Grant provided for under section 3(b) of the Employment Agreement, effective as of January 2022, so that the number of shares of Restricted Stock granted pursuant to such Annual Restricted Stock Grant equal the lesser of (a) $3,500,000 in value (based on the closing price of a share of Common Stock on the last business day of the prior year), or (b) 2.25% of outstanding shares of Common Stock, which shall vest in three equal installments on each anniversary of grant, provided, that no such award under (a) or (b) above shall be made to Mr. Berman (and no cash substitute shall be provided to Mr. Berman) to the extent shares are not available for grant under the Plan as of such date; and, provided, further, that the Company shall not be obligated to amend the Plan and/or seek shareholder approval of any amendment to increase the amount of available shares under the Plan. All capitalized terms used but not defined in the previous sentence have the meanings ascribed thereto in the Employment Agreement, as amended by the fifth amendment.
On August 23, 2011 we entered into an amended employment agreement with John J. (Jack) McGrath whereby he became Chief Operating Officer. As disclosed in greater detail below, Mr. McGrath’s employment agreement also provides for fixed and adjustable bonuses payable based upon adjusted EPS targets set in the agreement, based upon input from our outside consulting firm, with the adjustable bonus capped at a maximum of 125% of base salary. On September 29, 2016 we entered into a Fourth Amendment to the employment agreement with Mr. McGrath which provides, among other things, for (i) extension of the term to December 31, 2020; (i) modification of the performance and vesting standards for each Annual Restricted Stock Grant (“McGrath Annual Stock Grant”) provided for under Section 3(d) of his Employment Agreement, effective as of January 1, 2017, as follows: each McGrath Annual Stock Grant will be equal to $1 million, and 40% ($0.4 million) of each McGrath Annual Stock Grant will be subject to time vesting in four equal annual installments over four years, and 60% ($0.6 million) of each McGrath Annual Stock Grant will be subject to three year “cliff vesting” (i.e. vesting is based upon satisfaction of the performance measures at the close of the three year performance period), determined by the following performance measures: (A) total shareholder return as compared to the Russell 2000 Index (weighted 50%), (B) net revenue growth as compared to our peer group (weighted 25%) and (C) growth in Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization (“EBITDA”) as compared to our peer group (weighted 25%); and (iii) modification of the Annual Performance Bonus (“McGrath Annual Bonus”) provided for under Section 3(e) of his Employment Agreement, effective as of January 1, 2017, as follows: the McGrath Annual Bonus will be equal to up to 125% of base salary, and the actual amount will be determined by performance measures based upon net revenues and EBITDA, each performance measure weighted 50%, and with the specific performance criteria applicable to each McGrath Annual Bonus determined by the Compensation Committee during the first quarter of each fiscal year, and payable in cash (up to 100% of base salary) and shares of our common stock (any excess over 100% of base salary) with the shares of stock vesting over three years in equal quarterly installments.
Effective December 31, 2019 we amended Mr. McGrath’s employment agreement as follows: (i) to extend the term of the employment agreement for an additional year through December 31, 2021; (ii) a 2020 and 2021 performance bonus opportunity in a range between twenty-five percent (25%) and one hundred twenty-five percent (125%) of Base Salary, based upon the level of EBITDA achieved for the fiscal year, as determined by the Compensation Committee, which shall be payable in cash and is subject to additional terms and conditions as set forth therein; (iii) modification of the McGrath Annual Stock Grant provided for under section 3(d) of his Employment Agreement, effective as of January 2020, so that the number of shares of Restricted Stock granted pursuant to the McGrath Annual Stock Grant equal the lesser of (a) $1,000,000 in value (based on the closing price of a share of Common Stock on the last business day of the prior year), or (b) 0.5% of outstanding shares of Common Stock, which shall vest in four equal installments on each anniversary of grant, provided, that no such award under (a) or (b) above shall be made to Executive (and no cash substitute shall be provided to Executive) to the extent shares are not available for grant under the 2002 Plan as of such date; and, provided, further, that we shall not be obligated to amend the 2002 Plan and/or seek shareholder approval of any amendment to increase the amount of available shares under the 2002 Plan. All capitalized terms used but not defined in the previous sentence have the meanings ascribed thereto in the Employment Agreement, as amended by such amendment.
Effective April 1, 2018, we entered into an employment agreement with Brent T. Novak whereby he became our Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. As disclosed in greater detail below, Mr. Novak’s employment agreement provides for a performance-based bonus award equal to up to 125% of his base salary for the 2018-2020 fiscal years, which annual bonus shall be determined by the same performance criteria as established by the Compensation Committee of the Board for the applicable fiscal year for the Company’s Chairman/CEO and its Chief Operating Officer each year pursuant to their respective employment agreements, and shall be payable in cash and Restricted Stock Units in the same proportions and calculated in the same manner as provided for the Company’s Chief Operating Officer under such officer’s employment agreement, or if no such employment agreement is in effect, then as provided for in the employment agreement with the Company’s Chairman/CEO, except that the portion payable in Restricted Stock would be payable in Restricted Stock Units.
On October 17, 2019, we further amended Mr. Novak’s Amended Employment Agreement to provide for, among other things, the following: (i) payment of a special additional bonus pursuant to Section 2(d) of his Amended Employment Agreement; (ii) if a Sale Transaction is consummated, that will constitute Good Reason for Mr. Novak’s termination of the Amended Employment Agreement, entitling him to receive the severance benefits provided for under Section 4 of the Amended Employment Agreement upon a termination by him for Good Reason; (iii) if an agreement for a Sale Transaction is entered into and publicly announced but is not closed by January 31, 2020, that will constitute Good Reason for Mr. Novak’s termination of the Amended Employment Agreement, entitling him to receive the severance benefits provided for under Section 5 of the Amended Employment Agreement upon a termination by him for Good Reason; and (iv) upon a termination of Mr. Novak’s employment that is not described in Sections 4 or 5 of the Amended Employment Agreement, he will be entitled to receive twelve (12) months of health care coverage paid by the Company. All capitalized terms used but not defined in the previous sentence have the meanings ascribed thereto in Mr. Novak’s Amended Employment Agreement, as amended by Amendment Number Two.
Effective November 20, 2019, we entered into a letter agreement with John L. Kimble (the “Kimble Employment Agreement”). The Kimble Employment Agreement provides that Mr. Kimble will be our Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer as an at-will employee at an annual salary of $500,000. Mr. Kimble will also receive a grant of $250,000 restricted stock units (“RSUs”) on the date hereof and annual grants of $250,000 of RSUs for the initial year and $500,000 annual grants of RSUs for every year thereafter. The number of shares in each annual grant of RSUs will be determined by the closing price of our common stock on the last trading day prior to the day of each annual grant. 60% ($150,000 for the first year and $300,000 thereafter) of each annual grant of RSUs will be subject to three year “cliff vesting” (i.e. vesting is based upon performance at the close of the three year performance period), with vesting of each annual grant of RSUs determined by the following performance measures: (i) Total shareholder return as compared to the Russell 2000 Index (weighted 50%); (ii) Net revenue growth as compared to the Company’s peer group (weighted 25%), and (iii) EBITDA growth as compared to the Company’s peer group (weighted 25%). 40% ($100,000 for the first year and $200,000 thereafter) of each annual grant of RSUs will vest in 3 equal annual installments commencing on the first anniversary of the date of grant and on the second and third anniversaries thereafter. The Kimble Employment Agreement also contains provisions relating to benefits, change of control, and an annual performance-based bonus award equal to up to 125% of base salary.
On February 18, 2021, we amended the Kimble Employment Agreement as follows: (i) changing Mr. Kimble’s status from an “employee at will” by providing for a term extending through December 31, 2024; (ii) increase in annual salary to $520,000 effective immediately and annual increases of at least 4% commencing January 1, 2022; (iii) modification of the cash performance bonus opportunity for 2021 – 2024 to provide for a range between twenty-five percent (25%) and one hundred twenty five percent (125%) of Base Salary, based upon the level of EBITDA achieved by the Company for the fiscal year, as determined by the Compensation Committee, which shall be payable in cash and is subject to additional terms and conditions as set forth therein; (iv) modification of the provision of the Kimble Employment Agreement captioned “Restricted Stock Awards”, effective as of January 2022, to provide for the annual grant of a number of shares of Restricted Stock equal to the lesser of (a) his Base Salary in value (based on the closing price of a share of Common Stock on the last business day of the prior year), or (b) 1.05% of outstanding shares of Common Stock, which shall vest in three equal installments on each anniversary of grant, provided, that no such award under (a) or (b) above shall be made to Mr. Kimble (and no cash substitute shall be provided to Mr. Kimble) to the extent shares are not available for grant under the Plan as of such date; and, provided, further, that the Company shall not be obligated to amend the Plan and/or seek shareholder approval of any amendment to increase the amount of available shares under the Plan; and (v) as described above, inasmuch as this first amendment changes Mr. Kimble’s status as an employee at will, the Kimble Employment Agreement has also been revised to include provisions regarding minimum stock ownership requirements, “clawback” provisions and termination provisions for “Cause” and “Good Reason”, all of which new provisions, are similar to the provisions in the employment agreements of the Company’s other executive officers . All capitalized terms used but not defined in the previous sentence have the meanings ascribed thereto in the Kimble Employment Agreement, as amended by the first amendment.
While the Compensation Committee did not establish target performance levels for our former Chief Financial Officer, Joel Bennett, it did consider similar factors when determining such officer’s bonus. On December 27, 2017, we entered into a letter agreement with Mr. Bennett (the “Letter Agreement”), which provided for his stepping down from his position following completion of our annual report for the 2017 fiscal year or such earlier date that a successor has been named and transitioned to the office of Chief Financial Officer. The Letter Agreement provides, among other things, that Mr. Bennett will receive a severance payment in a maximum amount of up to 15 month’s salary, accelerated vesting of a portion of his restricted stock units and continued health care coverage for up to 12 months, and it requires Mr. Bennett to comply with confidentiality, non-disparagement and cooperation obligations.
The current employment agreements with our named executive officers also give the Compensation Committee the authority to award additional compensation to each of them as it determines in the Committee’s sole discretion based upon criteria it establishes.
The Compensation Committee also annually reviews the overall compensation of our named executive officers for the purpose of determining whether discretionary bonuses should be granted. The Compensation Committee annually reviews the base salaries, annual bonuses, total cash compensation, long-term compensation and total compensation of our senior executive officers relative to those companies. The performance comparison utilized by the Compensation Committee includes a comparison of our total shareholder return, earnings per share growth, sales, net income (and one-year growth of both measures) to the peer group companies. The Compensation Committee reviews this information along with details about the components of each named executive officer’s compensation. In 2018, after consultation with WTW, the Compensation Committee determined to continue using the performance criteria presented in WTW’s 2017 report to the Compensation Committee comparing our performance, size and executive compensation levels to those of peer group companies. The Compensation Committee did not consult with, or retain, a compensation consultant in 2020.
Peer Group
One of the factors considered by the Compensation Committee is the relative performance and the compensation of executives of peer group companies, which are comprised of a group of companies selected in conjunction with WTW that we believe provides relevant comparative information and represent a cross-section of publicly-traded companies with product lines and businesses similar to our own throughout the comparison period. The composition of the peer group is reviewed annually and adjusted as circumstances warrant. For the last fiscal year, the peer group companies utilized for executive compensation analysis, which remained the same as in the previous year, were:
● |
Activision Blizzard, Inc. |
● |
Deckers Outdoor Corporation |
● |
Electronic Arts, Inc. |
● |
Hasbro, Inc. |
● |
Mattel, Inc. |
● |
Take-Two Interactive, Inc. |
Elements of Executive Compensation
The compensation packages for the Company’s senior executives have both performance-based and non-performance based elements. Based on its review of each named executive officer’s total compensation opportunities and performance, and the Company’s performance, the Compensation Committee determines each year’s compensation in the manner that it considers to be most likely to achieve the objectives of our executive compensation program. The specific elements, which include base salary, annual cash incentive compensation and long-term equity compensation, are described below.
The Compensation Committee has negative discretion to adjust performance results used to determine annual incentive and the vesting schedule of long-term incentive payouts to the named executive officers and has discretion to grant bonuses even if the performance targets were not met.
Base Salary
Our executive officers receive base salary pursuant to the terms of their employment agreement. Mr. Berman has been an executive officer at least since his entry into his employment agreement in 2010, Mr. McGrath became an executive officer on August 23, 2011 pursuant to the terms of an amendment to his employment agreement, Mr. Novak became an executive officer when he entered into an employment agreement on April 1, 2018 through his resignation on December 6, 2019, and Mr. Kimble became an executive officer when he entered into a letter employment agreement on November 20, 2019.
Pursuant to the terms of their employment agreements as in effect on December 31, 2013, Messrs. Berman and McGrath each receive a base salary which is increased automatically each year by at least $25,000 for Mr. Berman and $15,000 for Mr. McGrath. The employment agreements for our chief financial officers do not provide for automatic annual increases in base salary. Any further increase in base salary, as the case may be above the contractually required minimum increase, is determined by the Compensation Committee based on the Committee’s analysis of a combination of two factors: the salaries paid in peer group companies to executives with similar responsibilities, and evaluation of the executive’s unique role, job performance and other circumstances. Evaluating both of these factors allows us to offer a competitive total compensation value to each individual named executive officer that takes into account the unique attributes of and circumstances relating to each individual and marketplace factors. This approach has allowed us to continue to meet our objective of offering a competitive total compensation value and attracting and retaining key personnel. Based on its review of these factors, the Compensation Committee determined not to increase the base salary of each of Messrs. McGrath and Bennett above the contractually required minimum increase in 2017-2019 as unnecessary to maintain our competitive total compensation position in the marketplace. Pursuant to the 2019 amendment to his employment agreement, Mr. Berman’s base salary as of August 9, 2019 was increased to $1,700,000.
Annual Cash Incentive Compensation
The function of the annual cash bonus is to establish a direct correlation between the annual incentives awarded to the participants and our financial performance. This purpose is in keeping with our compensation program’s objective of aligning a significant portion of each executive’s total compensation with our annual performance and the interests of our shareholders.
The employment agreements in effect during 2019 for Messrs. Berman, McGrath, Novak and Kimble provided for an incentive bonus award (payable in cash and restricted stock for Messrs. Berman and McGrath, and in cash and restricted stock units for Messrs. Novak and Kimble) based on a percentage of each participant’s base salary if the performance goals set by the Compensation Committee are met for that year. The employment agreements for Messrs. Berman and McGrath mandated that the specific criteria to be used is growth in net sales, EBITDA and total shareholder return, and the Committee sets the various target thresholds to be met to earn increasing amounts of the bonus up to a maximum of 300% of base salary for Mr. Berman and 125% for Messrs. McGrath, Novak and Kimble, although the Compensation Committee has the ability to increase the maximum in its discretion. The employment agreements for Messrs. Novak and Kimble provide for their criteria to be similar to Mr. McGrath’s. Commencing in 2012, the Committee is required to meet to establish criteria for earning the annual performance bonus (and with respect to Mr. Berman, any additional annual performance bonus) during the first quarter of the year. As described elsewhere herein, Mr. Berman’s employment agreement was further amended in 2016, 2019 and 2021, Mr. McGrath’s employment agreement was further amended in 2011 and 2019 and Mr. Kimble’s employment agreement was amended in 2021.
The employment agreements in effect on January 1, 2017 for Messrs. Berman, McGrath and our chief executive officers contemplated that the Compensation Committee may grant discretionary bonuses in situations where, in its sole judgment, it believes they are warranted. The Committee approaches this aspect of the particular executive’s compensation package by looking at the other components of the executive’s aggregate compensation and then evaluating if any additional compensation is appropriate to meet our compensation goals. As part of this review, the Committee, with information from WTW, collects information about the total compensation packages in and various indicia of performance by the peer group such as sales, one-year sales growth, net income, one-year net income growth, market capitalization, size of companies, one- and three-year stockholder returns, etc. and then compares such data to our corresponding performance data. Based upon our philosophy of executive compensation described above, the Committee did not approve discretionary bonuses for 2018, approved discretionary bonuses of $750,000 and $138,000 to Messrs. Berman and McGrath, respectively, for 2019. Mr. Kimble received a $100,000 discretionary bonus for 2020.
Long-Term Compensation
Long-term compensation is an area of particular emphasis in our executive compensation program because we believe that these incentives foster the long-term perspective necessary for our continued success. This emphasis is in keeping with our compensation program objective of aligning a significant portion of each executive’s total compensation with our long-term performance and the interests of our shareholders.
Historically, our long-term compensation program has focused on the granting of stock options that vested over time. However, commencing in 2006 we began shifting the emphasis of this element of compensation, and we currently favor the issuance of restricted stock awards or units. The Compensation Committee believes that the award of full-value shares that vest over time is consistent with our overall compensation philosophy and objectives, as the value of the restricted stock and units vary based upon the performance of our common stock, thereby aligning the interests of our executives with our shareholders. The Committee has also determined that awards of restricted stock awards and units are anti-dilutive as compared to stock options inasmuch as it feels that less restricted awards have to be granted to match the compensation value of stock options.
Mr. Berman’s 2010 amended and restated employment provided for annual grants of $500,000 of restricted stock which vest in equal annual installments through January 1, 2017, which was one year following the life of the agreement, subject to meeting the 3% vesting condition, as defined in the agreement. As described in greater detail below, pursuant to the 2012 amendment, commencing in 2013, this bonus changed to $3,500,000 of restricted stock, part of which vests over four years and part of which are subject to performance milestones with cliff vesting spread out over three years. Mr. McGrath’s amended employment agreement provides for annual grants of $75,000 of restricted stock which vests in equal installments over three years subject to meeting certain EPS milestones. As explained in greater detail below (see “Employment Agreements and Termination of Employment Arrangement”), it was changed to $1,000,000 of restricted stock effective January 1, 2017 subject in part to time vesting over four years and in part to performance milestones with cliff vesting spread over three years. Mr. Novak’s employment agreement provided for annual grants of $750,000 of RSUs subject in part to time vesting over three years and in part to performance milestones with cliff vesting spread over three years. Mr. Kimble’s employment agreement provided for a grant of $250,000 of RSU for the initial year and annual grants of $500,000 of RSUs thereafter subject in part to time vesting over three years and in part to performance milestones with cliff vesting spread over three years. The milestone targets for each of these employment agreements are established by the Compensation Committee during the first quarter of each year. The Company did not meet the vesting requirements contained in any of the employment agreements for 2017, so both Messrs. Berman and McGrath forfeited their stock awards for that year. As explained in greater detail below (see “Employment Agreements and Termination of Employment Arrangements”), the employment agreements for Messrs. Berman and McGrath also provide for an annual performance bonus based upon net revenue and EBITDA criteria. Commencing in 2012 for Mr. Berman and 2017 for Mr. McGrath, the criteria for earning such bonus are to be established by the Compensation Committee. This bonus, if earned, is payable partially in cash and partially in shares of restricted common stock. Messrs. Berman and McGrath earned 75% of the bonus based upon EBITDA criteria in 2020. Messrs. Berman and McGrath did not earn this bonus for 2019 or 2018.
Mr. Berman’s and McGrath's employment agreement also provide for an additional bonus solely in the discretion of the Compensation Committee. After a review of all of the factors discussed above, the Compensation Committee determined that, in keeping with our compensation objectives, Mr. Berman and McGrath were awarded $762,500 and $200,000 of discretionary bonus, respectively, for 2019. Mr. Kimble received a $100,000 discretionary bonus for 2020.
Other Benefits and Perquisites
Our executive officers participate in the health and dental coverage, life insurance, paid vacation and holidays, 401(k) retirement savings plans and other programs that are generally available to all of the Company’s employees.
The provision of any additional perquisites to each of the named executive officers is subject to review by the Compensation Committee. Historically, these perquisites include payment of an automobile allowance and matching contributions to a 401(k) defined contribution plan. In 2018 - 2020, the named executive officers were granted the following perquisites: automobile allowance and 401(k) plan matching contribution for Messrs. Berman, McGrath, Kimble, Novak and Bennett; and a life insurance benefit for Mr. Berman. We value perquisites at their incremental cost in accordance with SEC regulations.
We believe that the benefits and perquisites we provide to our named executive officers are within competitive practice and customary for executives in key positions at comparable companies. Such benefits and perquisites serve our objective of offering competitive compensation that allows us to continue to attract, retain and motivate highly talented people to these critical positions, ultimately providing a substantial benefit to our shareholders.
Change of Control/Termination Agreements
We recognize that, as with any public company, it is possible that a change of control may take place in the future and that the threat or occurrence of a change of control can result in significant distractions of key management personnel because of the uncertainties inherent in such a situation. We further believe that it is essential and in the best interests of the Company and our shareholders to retain the services of our key management personnel in the event of the threat or occurrence of a change of control and to ensure their continued dedication and efforts in such event without undue concern for their personal financial and employment security. In keeping with this belief and its objective of retaining and motivating highly talented individuals to fill key positions, which is consistent with our general compensation philosophy, the employment agreement for named chief executive officers contain provisions which guarantee specific payments and benefits upon a termination of employment without good reason following a change of control of the Company. In addition, the employment agreements also contain provisions providing for certain lump-sum payments if the executive is terminated without “cause” or if we materially breach the agreement leading the affected executive to terminate the agreement for good reason, as applicable.
Additional details of the terms of the change of control agreements and termination provisions outlined above are provided below.
Compensation Risk Management
As part of its annual review of our executive compensation program, the Compensation Committee reviews with management the design and operation of our incentive compensation arrangements for senior management, including executive officers, to determine if such programs might encourage inappropriate risk-taking that could have a material adverse effect on the Company. The Committee considers, among other things, the features of the Company’s compensation program that are designed to mitigate compensation-related risk, such as the performance objectives and target levels for incentive awards (which are based on overall Company performance), and its compensation recoupment policy. The Compensation Committee also considers our internal control structure which, among other things, limits the number of persons authorized to execute material agreements, requires approval of our Board of Directors for matters outside of the ordinary course and its whistle blower program. Based upon the above, the Committee concluded that any risks arising from the Company’s compensation plans, policies and practices are not reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company.
Impact of Shareholder Advisory Vote
At our 2020 annual meeting, our shareholders approved our current executive compensation with over 86% of all shares actually voting on the issue affirmatively giving their approval. Accordingly, we believe that this vote ratifies our executive compensation philosophy and policies, as currently adopted and implemented, and we intend to continue such philosophy and policies.
Pay Ratio Disclosure Rule
Pursuant to a mandate of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the “Dodd – Frank Act”), the SEC adopted a rule requiring annual disclosure of the ratio of the median employee’s annual total compensation to the total annual compensation of the principal executive officer ("PEO"). Our PEO is Mr. Berman. Our calculation of the ratio of the median employee compensation to our PEO’s compensation for the year ended December 31, 2020 is set forth below.
Median Employee total annual compensation (excluding Mr. Berman) |
$ | 75,352 | ||
Mr. Berman’s total annual compensation |
$ | 3,430,037 | ||
Ratio of PEO to Median Employee Compensation | 2.2 | % |
Mr. Berman’s total annual compensation used in the calculation above represents the gross amount reported on Form W-2 for 2020. This amount significantly differs from the 2020 amount of $3.5 million shown on the Summary Compensation Table. The Summary Compensation table includes $0.5 million of restricted stock awards granted on January 1, 2020, none of which were earned and vested as of December 31, 2020. The total amount of compensation earned by Mr. Berman in 2020 related to vested restricted stock awards and included in his total annual compensation above approximated $ 368,455.
In determining the median employee, a listing was prepared of all employees that received compensation for the year ended December 31, 2020. The median amount was selected from the annualized list. As of December 31, 2020, the Company employed 476 persons, of which 195 are based outside of the United States.
Summary Compensation Table– 2018-2020
Name and Principal Position |
Year |
Salary ($) |
Bonus ($) |
Stock Awards ($) (1) |
Option Awards ($) |
Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation ($) |
Change in Pension Value and Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings ($) |
All Other Compensation ($) (2) |
Total ($) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stephen G. Berman |
2020 |
1,617,188 | 1,320,000 | 544,001 | — | — | — | 24,208 | 3,505,397 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Chief Executive Officer, |
2019 |
1,569,902 | 762,500 | 1,531,251 | — | — | — | 52,094 | 3,915,747 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
President and Secretary |
2018 |
1,500,000 | — | 1,925,000 | — | — | — | 39,027 | 3,464,027 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
John J. McGrath |
2020 |
689,063 | 260,800 | 181,334 | — | — | — | 22,196 | 1,153,393 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Chief Operating Officer |
2019 |
710,656 | 200,000 | 437,501 | — | — | — | 36,882 | 1,385,039 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
2018 |
705,000 | — | 550,000 | — | — | — | 28,150 | 1,283,150 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Joel M. Bennett (3) |
2020 |
— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Former Executive Vice President |
2019 |
126,250 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 126,250 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
and Chief Financial Officer |
2018 |
682,071 | — | — | — | — | — | 28,250 | 710,321 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brent T. Novak (4) |
2020 |
— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Former Executive Vice President |
2019 |
507,923 | 250,000 | 449,999 | — | — | — | 29,900 | 1,237,822 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
and Chief Financial Officer |
2018 |
378,750 | — | 525,000 | — | — | — | 9,000 | 912,750 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
John L. Kimble (5) |
2020 |
468,750 | 280,000 | 499,998 | — | — | — | 20,796 | 1,269,544 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Executive Vice President |
2019 |
57,048 | — | 396,875 | — | — | — | 2,595 | 456,518 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
and Chief Financial Officer |
2018 |
— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
(1) |
For Mr. Berman, the grant-date fair value of the awards assuming 100% achievement of the applicable performance conditions totaled the lesser of (a) $3.5 million in value (based on the closing price of a share of Common Stock on the last business day of the prior year), or (b) 1.5% of outstanding shares of Common Stock in 2020, and $3.5 million in 2019 and 2018, respectively. For Mr. McGrath, the grant-date fair value of the awards assuming 100% achievement of the applicable performance conditions totaled the lesser of (a) $1.0 million in value (based on the closing price of a share of Common Stock on the last business day of the prior year), or (b) 0.5% of outstanding shares of Common Stock in 2020, and $1.0 million in 2019 and 2018, respectively. For Mr. Bennett, the grant-date fair value of the awards assuming 100% achievement of the applicable performance conditions totaled $750,000 in 2018. For Mr. Novak, the grant-date fair value of the awards assuming 100% achievement of the applicable performance conditions totaled $750,000 in 2019 and 2018. The 2019 award granted to Mr. Novak was forfeited in the same year due to his departure. For Mr. Kimble the grant-date fair value of the awards assuming 100% achievement of the applicable performance conditions totaled $500,000 in 2020 and 2019 respectively. The awards to Mr. Berman and Mr. McGrath are capped at the amount of available shares in the Plan. |
(2) |
Represents automobile allowances paid in the amount of $21,463, $24,079 and $17,291 for Mr. Berman for 2020, 2019 and 2018, respectively, $8,400, $14,000 and $14,000 for Mr. McGrath for 2020, 2019 and 2018, respectively, $7,000 and $1,500 for Mr. Kimble for 2020 and 2019, respectively, $11,000 and $9,000 for Mr. Novak for 2019 and 2018, respectively, and $14,500 for Mr. Bennett for 2018. The amounts include matching contributions made by us to the Named Executive Officer’s 401(k) defined contribution plan in the amount of nil, $14,000 and $13,750, respectively, for 2020, 2019 and 2018, for Mr. Berman. The amounts include matching contributions made by us to the Named Executive Officer’s 401(k) defined contribution plan in the amount of nil, $9,344 and $13,750, respectively, for 2020, 2019 and 2018, for Mr. McGrath, and includes $2,745, $14,015 and $7,985 related to a life insurance policy for Mr. Berman in 2020, 2019 and 2018, respectively. See “Employee Pension Plan.” |
(3) |
Mr. Bennett’s employment terminated in March 2018. Compensation in 2019 consists of severance pay of $126,250. Compensation in 2018 consists of $105,208 of salary, vacation and personal day payout of $71,863 and severance pay of $505,000. |
(4) |
Mr. Novak's employment terminated in December 2019. Compensation in 2019 consists of $472,628 of salary, vacation and personal day payout of $41,933. |
(5) |
Mr. Kimble commenced employment on November 20, 2019. |
The following table sets forth certain information regarding all equity-based compensation awards outstanding as of December 31, 2020 by the Named Officers:
Outstanding Equity Awards At Fiscal Year-end
Option Awards |
Stock Awards / Units |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Name |
Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options Exercisable (#) |
Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options Unexercisable (#) |
Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Unearned Options (#) |
Option Exercise Price ($) |
Option Expiration Date |
Number of Shares or Units of Stock that Have Not Vested (#) |
Market Value of Shares or Units of Stock that Have Not Vested ($) (1) |
Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights that Have Not Vested (#) |
Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Market or Payout Value of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested ($) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stephen G. Berman |
— | — | — | — | — | 393,050 | 1,957,389 | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
John J. McGrath |
— | — | — | — | — | 114,817 | 571,789 | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
John L. Kimble |
— | — | — | — | — | 125,691 | 625,941 | — | — |
|
(1) The product of (x) $4.98 (the closing sale price of the common stock on December 31, 2020) multiplied by (y) the number of unvested restricted shares or units outstanding. |
The following table sets forth certain information regarding amount realized upon the vesting and exercise of any equity-based compensation awards during 2020 by the Named Executive Officers:
Options Exercises And Stock Vested-2020
Option Awards |
Stock Awards / Units |
|||||||||||||||
Name |
Number of Shares Acquired on Exercise (#) |
Value Realized on Exercise ($) |
Number of Shares Acquired on Vesting (#) |
Value Realized on Vesting ($) |
||||||||||||
Stephen G. Berman |
— | — | 73,987 | 368,455 | ||||||||||||
John J. McGrath |
— | — | 21,140 | 105,277 | ||||||||||||
John L. Kimble |
— | — | 33,684 | 167,746 |
Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control
The following tables describe potential payments and other benefits that would have been received by each Named Officer at, following or in connection with any termination, including, without limitation, resignation, severance, retirement or a constructive termination of such Named Officer, or a change in control of our Company or a change in such Named Officer’s responsibilities on December 31, 2020. The potential payments listed below assume that there is no earned but unpaid base salary at December 31, 2020.
Stephen G. Berman
Upon Retirement |
Quits For “Good Reason” (3) |
Upon Death (4) |
Upon “Disability” (5) |
Termination Without “Cause” |
Termination For “Cause” (6) |
Involuntary Termination In Connection with Change of Control (7) |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Base Salary |
$ | — | $ | 1,766,020 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 1,766,020 | $ | — | $ | 8,044,013 | (8) | |||||||||||||
Restricted Stock (1) |
— | 1,957,389 | — | — | 1,957,389 | — | 1,957,389 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Annual Cash Incentive Award (2) |
— | — | — | — | — | — | — |
(1) The product of (x) $4.98 (the closing sale price of the common stock on December 31, 2020) multiplied by (y) the number of unvested restricted shares outstanding. |
|
(2) Assumes that if the Named Officer is terminated on December 31, 2020, they were employed through the end of the incentive period and no bonus was earned and unpaid. |
|
(3) Defined as (i) our violation or failure to perform or satisfy any material covenant, condition or obligation required to be performed or satisfied by us, or (ii) the material change in the nature, titles or scope of the duties, obligations, rights or powers of the Named Officer’s employment resulting from any action or failure to act by us. |
|
(4) Under the terms of Mr. Berman’s employment agreement (see “Employment Agreements”), the provision of health care coverage for Mr. Berman’s children will continue until they reach the maximum age at which a child can be covered as a matter of law under a parent’s policy in the event of his death during the term of his employment agreement. |
|
(5) Defined as the Named Officer’s inability to perform his duties by reason of any disability or incapacity (due to any physical or mental injury, illness or defect) for an aggregate of 180 days in any consecutive 12-month period. |
|
(6) Defined as (i) the Named Officer’s conviction of, or entering a plea of guilty or nolo contendere (which plea is not withdrawn prior to its approval by the court) to, a felony offense and either the Named Officer’s failure to perfect an appeal of such conviction prior to the expiration of the maximum period of time within which, under applicable law or rules of court, such appeal may be perfected or, if he does perfect such an appeal, the sustaining of his conviction of a felony offense on appeal; or (ii) the determination by our Board of Directors, after due inquiry, based upon convincing evidence, that the Named Officer has: |
(A) committed fraud against, or embezzled or misappropriated funds or other assets of, our Company (or any subsidiary); |
|
(B) violated, or caused our Company (or any subsidiary) or any of our officers, employees or other agents, or any other individual or entity to violate, any material law, rule, regulation or ordinance, or any material written policy, rule or directive of our Company or our Board of Directors; |
|
(C) willfully, or because of gross or persistent inaction, failed properly to perform his duties or acted in a manner detrimental to, or adverse to our interests; or |
|
(D) violated, or failed to perform or satisfy any material covenant, condition or obligation required to be performed or satisfied by him under his employment agreement with us; and that, in the case of any violation or failure referred to in clause (B), (C) or (D), above, such violation or failure has caused, or is reasonably likely to cause, us to suffer or incur a substantial casualty, loss, penalty, expense or other liability or cost. |
(7) Section 280G of the Code disallows a company’s tax deduction for what are defined as “excess parachute payments” and Section 4999 of the Code imposes a 20% excise tax on any person who receives excess parachute payments. As discussed above, Mr. Berman is entitled to certain payments upon termination of his employment, including termination following a change in control of our Company. Under the terms of his employment agreement (see “Employment Agreements”), Mr. Berman is entitled to the full amount of the payments and benefits payable in the event of a Change in Control (as defined in the employment agreement) even if it triggers an excise tax imposed by the tax code if the net after-tax amount would still be greater than reducing the total payments and benefits to avoid such excise tax. |
|
(8) Under the terms of Mr. Berman’s employment agreement (see “Employment Agreements”), if a change of control occurs and within two years thereafter Mr. Berman is terminated without “Cause” or quits for “Good Reason,” then he has the right to receive a payment equal to 2.99 times his then current base amount as defined in section 280(G) of the Code (which was $2,674,286 in 2020) and continued health care coverage. |
John J. McGrath
Upon Retirement |
Quits For “Good Reason” (3) |
Upon Death |
Upon “Disability” (4) |
Termination Without “Cause” |
Termination For “Cause” (5) |
Involuntary Termination In Connection with Change of Control (6) |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Base Salary |
$ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 777,593 | $ | — | $ | 1,555,185 | ||||||||||||||
Restricted Stock (1) |
— | — | — | — | 571,789 | — | 571,789 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Annual Cash Incentive Award (2) |
— | — | — | — | — | — | — |
(1) The product of (x) $4.98 (the closing sale price of the common stock on December 31, 2020) multiplied by (y) the number of unvested restricted shares outstanding. |
|
(2) Assumes that if the Named Officer is terminated on December 31, 2020, they were employed through the end of the incentive period and no bonus was earned and unpaid. |
|
(3) Defined as following a Change of Control (i) any material reduction of the Named Officer’s base salary, (ii) relocation of the Named Officer’s principal place of employment by more than thirty miles, or (iii) the material change in the nature, titles or scope of the duties, obligations, rights or powers of the Named Officer’s employment resulting from any action or failure to act by us. |
|
(4) Defined as a Named Officer’s inability to perform his duties by reason of any disability or incapacity (due to any physical or mental injury, illness or defect) for an aggregate of 90 days in any consecutive 12-month period. |
|
(5) Defined as (i) the Named Officer’s conviction of, or entering a plea of guilty or nolo contendere (which plea is not withdrawn prior to its approval by the court) to, a felony offense or other crime and either the Named Officer’s failure to perfect an appeal of such conviction prior to the expiration of the maximum period of time within which, under applicable law or rules of court, such appeal may be perfected or, if he does perfect such an appeal, the sustaining of his conviction of a felony offense on appeal; or (ii) the determination by our Board of Directors, after due inquiry, based on convincing evidence, that the Named Officer has: |
(A) committed fraud against, or embezzled or misappropriated funds or other assets of, our Company (or any subsidiary); |
|
(B) violated, or caused our Company (or any subsidiary) or any of our officers, employees or other agents, or any other individual or entity to violate, any material law, rule, regulation or ordinance, or any material written policy, rule or directive of our Company or our Board of Directors; |
|
(C) willfully, or because of gross or persistent inaction, failed properly to perform his duties or acted in a manner detrimental to, or adverse to our interests; or |
|
(D) violated, or failed to perform or satisfy any material covenant, condition or obligation required to be performed or satisfied by him under his employment agreement with us; and that, in the case of any violation or failure referred to in clause (B), above, such violation is reasonably expected to have a significant detrimental effect on our Company (or any subsidiary). |
(6) Under the terms of Mr. McGrath’s employment agreement (see “Employment Agreements”), if a change of control occurs and within one year thereafter Mr. McGrath is terminated without “Cause” or quits for “Good Reason”, then he has the right to receive a payment equal to the greater of two times his then current base salary or the payments due for the remainder of the term of his employment agreement. |
John L. Kimble
Upon Retirement |
Quits For “Good Reason” (3) |
Upon Death |
Upon “Disability” |
Termination Without “Cause” |
Termination For “Cause” (4) |
Involuntary Termination In Connection with Change of Control (5) |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Base Salary |
$ | — | $ | 1,095,185 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 1,095,185 | $ | — | $ | 1,095,185 | ||||||||||||||
Restricted Stock Units (1) |
— | 625,941 | — | — | 625,941 | — | 625,941 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Annual Cash Incentive Award (2) |
— | — | — | — | — | — | — |
(1) The product of (x) $4.98 (the closing sale price of the common stock on December 31, 2020) multiplied by (y) the number of unvested restricted shares outstanding. |
|
(2) Assumes that if the Named Officer is terminated on December 31, 2020, they were employed through the end of the incentive period and no bonus was earned and unpaid. |
|
(3) Defined as (i) any material reduction of the Named Officer’s base salary, (ii) relocation of the Named Officer’s principal place of employment by more than thirty miles, or (iii) the material change in the nature, titles or scope of the duties, obligations, rights or powers of the Named Officer’s employment resulting from any action or failure to act by us. |
|
(4) Defined as (i) the Named Officer’s conviction of, or entering a plea of guilty or nolo contendere (which plea is not withdrawn prior to its approval by the court) to, a felony offense and either the Named Officer’s failure to perfect an appeal of such conviction prior to the expiration of the maximum period of time within which, under applicable law or rules of court, such appeal may be perfected or, if he does perfect such an appeal, the sustaining of his conviction of a felony offense on appeal; or (ii) the determination by our Board of Directors, after due inquiry, based on convincing evidence, that the Named Officer has: |
(A) committed fraud against, or embezzled or misappropriated funds or other assets of, our Company (or any subsidiary); |
|
(B) violated, or caused our Company (or any subsidiary) or any of our officers, employees or other agents, or any other individual or entity to violate, any material law, rule, regulation or ordinance, or any material written policy, rule or directive of our Company or our Board of Directors; |
|
(C) willfully, or because of gross or persistent inaction, failed properly to perform his duties or acted in a manner detrimental to, or adverse to our interests; or |
|
(D) violated, or failed to perform or satisfy any material covenant, condition or obligation required to be performed or satisfied by him under his employment agreement with us; and that, in the case of any violation or failure referred to in clause (B), (C) or (D), above, such violation or failure has caused, or is reasonably likely to cause, us to suffer or incur a substantial casualty, loss, penalty, expense or other liability or cost. |
(5) Under the terms of Mr. Kimble’s employment agreement (see “Employment Agreements”), if a change of control occurs and within one year thereafter Mr. Kimble is terminated without “Cause” or quits for “Good Reason”, then he has the right to receive a payment equal to two times his then current base salary. |
Compensation of Directors
Analogous to our executive compensation philosophy, it is our desire to similarly compensate our non-employee Directors for their services in a way that will serve to attract and retain highly qualified members of the Board. As changes in securities laws require greater involvement by, and places additional burdens on, a company’s Directors, it becomes even more necessary to locate and retain highly qualified Directors. As such, after consulting with Lipis Consulting Inc., the Compensation Committee developed and the Board approved a structure for the compensation package of our non- employee Directors so that the total compensation package of our non-employee Directors would be at approximately the median total compensation package for non-employee Directors in our peer group.
In December 2009, our Board of Directors, after consulting with our prior consultant, changed the compensation package for non-employee Directors as of January 1, 2010 by (i) increasing the annual cash stipend to $75,000, (ii) eliminating meeting fees for attendance at both Board and committee meetings, (iii) increasing the annual fees paid to committee chairs and the members of the audit committee, (iv) decreasing by $25,000 the value of the annual grant of restricted shares of our common stock to $100,000 and (v) imposing minimum shareholding requirements. Specifically, the chair of the Audit Committee receives an annual fee of $30,000, each member of the Audit Committee receives a $15,000 annual fee (including the chair), the chair of the Compensation Committee and the Nominating and Governance Committee each receives an annual fee of $15,000, and each member of such committees (including the chair) receives an annual fee of $10,000. Newly-elected non-employee Directors will receive a portion of the foregoing annual consideration, prorated according to the portion of the year in which they serve in such capacity.
Following the Recapitalization, our Board of Directors changed the compensation payable to non-employee Directors to provide that (i) each director receives an annual cash fee of $100,000 paid quarterly, (ii) each member of a Committee receives an annual cash fee of $5,000, (iii) the chair of the Audit Committee receives an additional cash fee of $15,000 and (iv) the chair of the other Committees receives an additional $10,000. Mr. Winkler, pursuant to the internal rules of his employer, does not receive any fees as a director.
In February 2010 our Board determined the terms for the minimum shareholding requirements. Pursuant to the new minimum shareholding requirements, each director will be required to hold shares with a value equal to at least two times the average annual cash stipend paid to the director during the prior two calendar years. To illustrate: if an average Director wishes to sell shares in 2021, he will have to hold shares with a market value of at least $215,844 prior to and following any sale of shares calculated as of the date of the sale, such $215,844 minimum calculated by taking the average cash stipend of $107,922 paid during the prior two years multiplied by two.
The following table sets forth the compensation we paid to our non-employee Directors for our fiscal year ended December 31, 2020:
Director Compensation
Name |
Year |
Fees Earned or Paid in Cash ($) |
Stock Awards ($) |
Option Awards ($) |
Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation ($) |
Change in Pension Value and Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings ($) |
All Other Compensation ($) |
Total ($) |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Alexander Shoghi |
2020 |
130,000 | — | — | — | — | — | 130,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Zhao Xiaoqiang |
2020 |
100,000 | — | — | — | — | — | 100,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Andrew Axelrod |
2020 |
120,000 | — | — | — | — | — | 120,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Carole Levine |
2020 |
105,000 | 105,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Joshua Cascade |
2020 |
100,000 | — | — | — | — | — | 100,000 |
Employment Agreements and Termination of Employment Arrangements
We entered into an amended and restated employment agreement with Mr. Berman on November 11, 2010. We entered into an amended employment agreement with Mr. McGrath on August 23, 2011 when he became our Chief Operating Officer. We entered into a new employment agreement with Mr. Novak on April 1, 2018 when he became our Chief Financial Officer. We entered into a new employment agreement with Mr. Kimble on November 20, 2019 when he became our Chief Financial Officer.
On June 7, 2016, we amended the employment agreement between us and Mr. Berman, our Chairman, CEO and President, and entered into Amendment Number Two to Mr. Berman’s Second Amended and Restated Employment Agreement dated November 11, 2010 (the “Employment Agreement”). The terms of Mr. Berman’s Employment Agreement have been amended as follows: (i) extension of the term until December 31, 2020; (ii) increase of Mr. Berman’s Base Salary to $1,450,000 effective June 1, 2016, subject to annual increases thereafter as determined by the Compensation Committee, with annual minimum increases of $25,000 commencing January 1, 2017; (iii) modification of the performance and vesting standards for each $3.5 million Annual Restricted Stock Grant (“Annual Stock Grant”) provided for under Section 3(b) of the Employment Agreement, effective as of January 1, 2017, so that 40% ($1.4 million) of each Annual Stock Grant will be subject to time vesting in four equal annual installments over four years and 60% ($2.1 million) of each Annual Stock Grant will be subject to three year “cliff vesting” (i.e. payment is based upon performance at the close of the three year performance period), with vesting of each Annual Stock Grant determined by the following performance measures: (a) total shareholder return as compared to the Russell 2000 Index (weighted 50%), (b) net revenue growth as compared to our peer group (weighted 25%) and (c) EBITDA growth as compared to our peer group (weighted 25%); (iv) modification of the performance measures for award of the Annual Performance Bonus equal to up to 300% of Base Salary (“Annual Bonus”) provided for under Section 3(d) of the Employment Agreement, effective as of January 1, 2017, so that the performance measures will be based only upon net revenues and EBITDA, each performance measure weighted 50%, and with the specific performance criteria applicable to each Annual Bonus determined by the Compensation Committee during the first quarter of each fiscal year; and (v) provision of health and dental insurance coverage for Mr. Berman’s children in the event of his death during the term of the Employment Agreement.
On August 9, 2019, we further amended Mr. Berman’s Employment Agreement as follows: (i) increase of Mr. Berman’s Base Salary to $1,700,000, effective immediately; (ii) addition of a 2020 performance bonus opportunity in a range between twenty-five percent (25%) and three hundred percent (300%) of Base Salary, based upon the level of EBITDA achieved for the fiscal year, as determined by the Compensation Committee, and subject to additional terms and conditions as set forth therein; (iii) addition of a special sale transaction bonus equal to $1,000,000 if we enter into and consummate a Sale Transaction on or before February 15, 2020, subject to additional terms and conditions as set forth therein; (iv) modification of the Berman Annual Stock Grant provided for under section 3(b) of the Employment Agreement, effective as of January 2020, so that the number of shares of Restricted Stock granted pursuant to the Berman Annual Stock Grant equal the lesser of (a) $3,500,000 in value (based on the closing price of a share of Common Stock on December 31, 2019), or (b) 1.5% of outstanding shares of Common Stock, which shall vest in four equal installments on each anniversary of grant; (v) waiver of certain “Change of Control”, Liquidity Event, and other provisions under the Employment Agreement with respect to certain Specified Transactions; and (vi) modification of the definition of “Good Reason Event” to include a change in membership of the Board such that following such change, a majority of the directors are not Continuing Directors. All capitalized terms used but not defined in the previous sentence have the meanings ascribed thereto in the Employment Agreement, as amended by the third amendment.
On November 18, 2019, we further amended Mr. Berman’s Employment Agreement as follows: (i) to extend the term of the Employment Agreement for an additional year through December 31, 2021; (ii) addition of a 2021 performance bonus opportunity in a range between twenty-five percent (25%) and three hundred percent (300%) of Base Salary, based upon the level of EBITDA achieved for the fiscal year, as determined by the Compensation Committee, which shall be payable in cash and is subject to additional terms and conditions as set forth therein; (iii) modification of the Berman Annual Stock Grant provided for under section 3(b) of the Employment Agreement, effective as of January 2020, so that the number of shares of Restricted Stock granted pursuant to the Berman Annual Stock Grant equal the lesser of (a) $3,500,000 in value (based on the closing price of a share of Common Stock on the last business day of the prior year), or (b) 1.5% of outstanding shares of Common Stock, which shall vest in four equal installments on each anniversary of grant, provided, that no such award under (a) or (b) above shall be made to Executive (and no cash substitute shall be provided to Executive) to the extent shares are not available for grant under the Company’s 2002 Plan as of such date; and, provided, further, that we shall not be obligated to amend the 2002 Plan and/or seek shareholder approval of any amendment to increase the amount of available shares under the 2002 Plan. All capitalized terms used but not defined in the previous sentence have the meanings ascribed thereto in the Employment Agreement, as amended by the fourth amendment.
On February 18, 2021, we further amended Mr. Berman’s Employment Agreement as follows: (i) to extend the Term of the Employment Agreement for an additional three years through December 31, 2024; (ii) addition of a performance bonus opportunity for 2022 – 2024 in a range between twenty-five percent (25%) and three hundred percent (300%) of Base Salary, based upon the level of EBITDA achieved by the Company for the fiscal year, as determined by the Compensation Committee, which shall be payable in cash and is subject to additional terms and conditions as set forth therein; and (iii) modification of the Annual Restricted Stock Grant provided for under section 3(b) of the Employment Agreement, effective as of January 2022, so that the number of shares of Restricted Stock granted pursuant to such Annual Restricted Stock Grant equal the lesser of (a) $3,500,000 in value (based on the closing price of a share of Common Stock on the last business day of the prior year), or (b) 2.25% of outstanding shares of Common Stock, which shall vest in three equal installments on each anniversary of grant, provided, that no such award under (a) or (b) above shall be made to Mr. Berman (and no cash substitute shall be provided to Mr. Berman) to the extent shares are not available for grant under the Plan as of such date; and, provided, further, that the Company shall not be obligated to amend the Plan and/or seek shareholder approval of any amendment to increase the amount of available shares under the Plan. All capitalized terms used but not defined in the previous sentence have the meanings ascribed thereto in the Employment Agreement, as amended by the fifth amendment.
On September 29, 2016, we entered into a Fourth Amendment to the employment agreement between us and Mr. McGrath, dated March 4, 2010 (which was effective January 1, 2010) (the “Employment Agreement”). The terms of Mr. McGrath’s Employment Agreement were amended as follows: (i) extension of the term until December 31, 2020; (ii) modification of the performance and vesting standards for each Annual Restricted Stock Grant (“Annual Stock Grant”) provided for under Section 3(d) of the Employment Agreement, effective as of January 1, 2017, as follows: each Annual Stock Grant will be equal to $1 million, and 40% ($0.4 million) of each Annual Stock Grant will be subject to time vesting in four equal annual installments over four years, and 60% ($0.6 million) of each Annual Stock Grant will be subject to three year “cliff vesting” (i.e. vesting is based upon satisfaction of the performance measures at the close of the three year performance period), determined by the following performance measures: (A) total shareholder return as compared to the Russell 2000 Index (weighted 50%), (B) net revenue growth as compared to our peer group (weighted 25%) and (C) growth in Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization (“EBITDA”) as compared to our peer group (weighted 25%); and (iii) modification of the Annual Performance Bonus (“Annual Bonus”) provided for under Section 3(e) of the Employment Agreement, effective as of January 1, 2017, as follows: the Annual Bonus will be equal to up to 125% of Base Salary, and the actual amount will be determined by performance measures based upon net revenues and EBITDA, each performance measure weighted 50%, and with the specific performance criteria applicable to each Annual Bonus determined by the Compensation Committee during the first quarter of each fiscal year, and payable in cash (up to 100% of Base Salary) and shares of our common stock (any excess over 100% of Base Salary) with the shares of stock vesting over three years in equal quarterly installments.
Effective February 28, 2018, we entered into a Fifth Amendment to Mr. McGrath’s Employment Agreement, to provide that if a change of control occurs and within one year thereafter Mr. McGrath is terminated without “Cause” or quits with “Good Reason”, then he has the right to receive a payment equal to the greater of two times his then current base salary or the payments due for the remainder of the term of his Employment Agreement. The Fifth Amendment amended the definition of “Cause” to mean (i) Mr. McGrath’s conviction of, or entering a plea of guilty or nolo contendere (which plea is not withdrawn prior to its approval by the court) to, a felony offense or other crime and either Mr. McGrath’s failure to perfect an appeal of such conviction prior to the expiration of the maximum period of time within which, under applicable law or rules of court, such appeal may be perfected or, if he does perfect such an appeal, the sustaining of his conviction of a felony offense on appeal; or (ii) the determination by our Board of Directors, after due inquiry, based on convincing evidence, that Mr. McGrath has: (A) committed fraud against, or embezzled or misappropriated funds or other assets of, our Company (or any subsidiary); (B) violated, or caused our Company (or any subsidiary) or any of our officers, employees or other agents, or any other individual or entity to violate, any material law, regulation or ordinance, or any material policy, rule, regulation or practice established by our Company or our Board of Directors; (C) willfully, or because of gross or persistent inaction, failed properly to perform his duties or acted in a manner detrimental to, or adverse to our interests; or (D) violated, or failed to perform or satisfy any material covenant, condition or obligation required to be performed or satisfied by him under his employment agreement with the Company; and that, in the case of any violation or failure referred to in clause (B), above, such violation is reasonably expected to have a significant detrimental effect on our Company (or any subsidiary). The Fifth Amendment provided for definition of the term “Good Reason” to mean i) any material reduction of Mr. McGrath’s base salary, (ii) relocation of Mr. McGrath’s principal place of employment by more than thirty miles, or (iii) the material change in the nature, titles or scope of the duties, obligations, rights or powers of Mr. McGrath’s employment resulting from any action or failure to act by the Company.
Effective December 31, 2019 we amended Mr. McGrath’s employment agreement as follows: (i) to extend the term of the employment agreement for an additional year through December 31, 2021; (ii) a 2020 and 2021 performance bonus opportunity in a range between twenty-five percent (25%) and one hundred twenty-five percent (125%) of Base Salary, based upon the level of EBITDA achieved for the fiscal year, as determined by the Compensation Committee, which shall be payable in cash and is subject to additional terms and conditions as set forth therein; (iii) modification of the McGrath Annual Stock Grant provided for under section 3(d) of his Employment Agreement, effective as of January 2020, so that the number of shares of Restricted Stock granted pursuant to the McGrath Annual Stock Grant equal the lesser of (a) $1,000,000 in value (based on the closing price of a share of Common Stock on the last business day of the prior year), or (b) 0.5% of outstanding shares of Common Stock, which shall vest in four equal installments on each anniversary of grant, provided, that no such award under (a) or (b) above shall be made to Executive (and no cash substitute shall be provided to Executive) to the extent shares are not available for grant under the 2002 Plan as of such date; and, provided, further, that we shall not be obligated to amend the 2002 Plan and/or seek shareholder approval of any amendment to increase the amount of available shares under the 2002 Plan. All capitalized terms used but not defined in the previous sentence have the meanings ascribed thereto in the Employment Agreement, as amended by such amendment.
Effective April 1, 2018, we entered into an employment agreement with Brent T. Novak which provides that Mr. Novak will be our Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer at an annual salary of $505,000. Mr. Novak will also receive annual grants of $750,000 of restricted stock units (“RSUs”). The number of shares in each annual grant of RSUs will be determined by the closing price of our common stock on the last trading day prior to the day of each annual grant. Forty percent (40%), or $300,000 of each annual grant of RSUs, will be subject to three year “cliff vesting” (i.e., vesting is based upon performance at the close of the three year performance period), with vesting of each annual grant of RSUs determined by the following performance measures: (i) Total shareholder return as compared to the Russell 2000 Index (weighted 50%); (ii) Net revenue growth as compared to the Company’s peer group (weighted 25%), and (iii) EBITDA growth as compared to the Company’s peer group (weighted 25%). The remaining sixty percent (60%), or $450,000 of each annual grant of RSUs, will vest in three equal annual installments commencing on the first anniversary of the date of grant and on the second and third anniversaries thereafter. The employment agreement also contains provisions relating to benefits, change of control, and an annual performance-based bonus award equal to up to 125% of base salary for the 2018-2020 fiscal years. The annual performance bonus shall be determined by the same performance criteria as established by the Compensation Committee of the Board for the applicable fiscal year for the Company’s Chairman/CEO and its Chief Operating Officer each year pursuant to their respective employment agreements, and shall be payable in cash and Restricted Stock Units in the same proportions and calculated in the same manner as provided for the Company’s Chief Operating Officer under such officer’s employment agreement, or if no such employment agreement is in effect, then as provided for in the employment agreement with the Company’s Chairman/CEO, except that the portion payable in Restricted Stock would be payable to Mr. Novak in RSUs.
On October 17, 2019, we further amended Mr. Novak’s Amended Employment Agreement to provide for, among other things, the following: (i) payment of a special additional bonus pursuant to Section 2(d) of his Amended Employment Agreement; (ii) if a Sale Transaction is consummated, that will constitute Good Reason for Mr. Novak’s termination of the Amended Employment Agreement, entitling him to receive the severance benefits provided for under Section 4 of the Amended Employment Agreement upon a termination by him for Good Reason; (iii) if an agreement for a Sale Transaction is entered into and publicly announced but is not closed by January 31, 2020, that will constitute Good Reason for Mr. Novak’s termination of the Amended Employment Agreement, entitling him to receive the severance benefits provided for under Section 5 of the Amended Employment Agreement upon a termination by him for Good Reason; and (iv) upon a termination of Mr. Novak’s employment that is not described in Sections 4 or 5 of the Amended Employment Agreement, he will be entitled to receive twelve (12) months of health care coverage paid by the Company. All capitalized terms used but not defined in the previous sentence have the meanings ascribed thereto in Mr. Novak’s Amended Employment Agreement, as amended by Amendment Number Two.
On November 7, 2019, Brent T. Novak notified us of his decision to resign from his position as the Company’s Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, effective December 6, 2019.
Effective November 20, 2019, we entered into a letter agreement with John L. Kimble (the “Kimble Employment Agreement”). The Kimble Employment Agreement provides that Mr. Kimble will be our Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer as an at-will employee at an annual salary of $500,000. Mr. Kimble will also receive a grant of $250,000 restricted stock units (“RSUs”) on the date hereof and annual grants of $250,000 of RSUs for the initial year and $500,000 annual grants of RSUs for every year thereafter. The number of shares in each annual grant of RSUs will be determined by the closing price of our common stock on the last trading day prior to the day of each annual grant. 60% ($150,000 for the first year and $300,000 thereafter) of each annual grant of RSUs will be subject to three year “cliff vesting” (i.e. vesting is based upon performance at the close of the three year performance period), with vesting of each annual grant of RSUs determined by the following performance measures: (i) Total shareholder return as compared to the Russell 2000 Index (weighted 50%); (ii) Net revenue growth as compared to the Company’s peer group (weighted 25%), and (iii) EBITDA growth as compared to the Company’s peer group (weighted 25%). 40% ($100,000 for the first year and $200,000 thereafter) of each annual grant of RSUs will vest in 3 equal annual installments commencing on the first anniversary of the date of grant and on the second and third anniversaries thereafter. The Kimble Employment Agreement also contains provisions relating to benefits, change of control, and an annual performance-based bonus award equal to up to 125% of base salary.
On February 18, 2021, we amended the Kimble Employment Agreement as follows: (i) changing Mr. Kimble’s status from an “employee at will” by providing for a term extending through December 31, 2024; (ii) increase in annual salary to $520,000 effective immediately and annual increases of at least 4% commencing January 1, 2022; (iii) modification of the cash performance bonus opportunity for 2021 – 2024 in a range between twenty-five percent (25%) and one hundred twenty five percent (125%) of Base Salary, based upon the level of EBITDA achieved by the Company for the fiscal year, as determined by the Compensation Committee, which shall be payable in cash and is subject to additional terms and conditions as set forth therein; (iv) modification of the provision of the Kimble Employment Agreement captioned “Restricted Stock Awards”, effective as of January 2022, to provide for the annual grant of a number of shares of Restricted Stock equal to the lesser of (a) Mr. Kimble’s Base Salary in value (based on the closing price of a share of Common Stock on the last business day of the prior year), or (b) 1.05% of outstanding shares of Common Stock, which shall vest in three equal installments on each anniversary of grant, provided, that no such award under (a) or (b) above shall be made to Mr. Kimble (and no cash substitute shall be provided to Mr. Kimble) to the extent shares are not available for grant under the Plan as of such date; and, provided, further, that the Company shall not be obligated to amend the Plan and/or seek shareholder approval of any amendment to increase the amount of available shares under the Plan; and (v) as described above, inasmuch as this first amendment changes Mr. Kimble’s status as an employee at will, the Kimble Employment Agreement has also been revised to include provisions regarding minimum stock ownership requirements, “clawback” provisions and termination provisions for “Cause” and “Good Reason”, all of which new provisions, are similar to the provisions in the employment agreements of the Company’s other executive officers. All capitalized terms used but not defined in the previous sentence have the meanings ascribed thereto in the Kimble Employment Agreement, as amended by the first amendment.
The foregoing is only a summary of the material terms of our employment agreements with the Named Executive Officers. For a complete description, copies of such agreements are annexed herein in their entirety as exhibits or are otherwise incorporated herein by reference.
On October 19, 2011, our Board of Directors approved the material terms of and adoption of our Company’s Change in Control Severance Plan (the “Severance Plan”), which applies to certain of our key employees. None of our named executive officers participate in the Severance Plan. The Severance Plan provides that if, within the two year period immediately following the “change in control” date (as defined in the Severance Plan), a participant has a qualifying termination of employment, the participant will be entitled to severance equal to a multiple of monthly base salary, which multiple is the greater of (i) the number of months remaining in the participant’s term of employment under his or her employment agreement and (ii) a number ranging between 12 and 18; accelerated vesting of all unvested equity awards; and continued health care coverage for the number of months equal to the multiple used to determine the severance payment. On February 26, 2020 our Board of Directors terminated the Severance Plan, but such termination would not be effective as to any employee who was a participant as of the termination date if a Change In Control were to occur prior to the twelve-month period following the termination date.
Employee Benefits Plan
We sponsor for all of our U.S. employees a defined contribution plan under Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code that provides that employees may defer a portion of their annual compensation subject to annual dollar limitations, and that we will make a matching contribution equal to 100% of each employee’s deferral, up to 5% of the employee’s annual compensation and further subject to federal limitations. We eliminated the match on March 31, 2019. Company matching contributions, which vested immediately, totaled nil, $1.1 million, and $2.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018, respectively.
Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation
None of our executive officers has served as a director or member of a compensation committee (or other Board committee performing equivalent functions) of any other entity, one of whose executive officers served as a director or a member of our Compensation Committee.
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters
The following table sets forth certain information as of March 3, 2021 with respect to the beneficial ownership of our common stock by (1) each person known by us to own beneficially more than 5% of the outstanding shares of our common stock, (2) each of our directors, (3) each of our named executive officers, and (4) all our directors and executive officers as a group.
Name and Address of |
Amount |
Percent of |
||||||
Oasis Management Company Ltd. |
177,085 | (5) | 3.0 | % | ||||
Hong Kong Meisheng Cultural Company Limited |
523,954 | (6) | 8.9 | |||||
Benefit Street Partners, L.L.C. |
236,292 | (7) | 4.0 | |||||
Lawrence I. Rosen |
522,101 | (8) | 8.8 | |||||
Stephen G. Berman |
538,241 | (9) | 9.1 | |||||
John L. Kimble |
33,683 | (10) | * | |||||
John J. McGrath |
160,164 | (11) | 2.7 | |||||
Alexander Shoghi |
12,564 | (12) | * | |||||
Zhao Xiaoqiang |
9,629 | (13) | * | |||||
Andrew Axelrod |
- | - | ||||||
Matthew Winkler |
- | - | ||||||
Joshua Cascade |
- | - | ||||||
Carole Levine |
- | - | ||||||
All Directors and executive officers as a group (9 persons) |
754,281 | (14) | 12.8 |
* |
Less than 1% of our outstanding shares. |
(1) |
Unless otherwise indicated, such person’s address is c/o JAKKS Pacific, Inc., 2951 28th Street, Santa Monica, California 90405. |
(2) |
The number of shares of common stock beneficially owned by each person or entity is determined under the rules promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission. Under such rules, beneficial ownership includes any shares as to which the person or entity has sole or shared voting power or investment power. The percentage of our outstanding shares is calculated by including among the shares owned by such person any shares which such person or entity has the right to acquire within 60 days after March 3, 2021. The inclusion herein of any shares deemed beneficially owned does not constitute an admission of beneficial ownership of such shares. |
(3) |
Except as otherwise indicated, exercises sole voting power and sole investment power with respect to such shares. |
(4) |
Based upon 5,900,463 shares outstanding on March 3, 2021. Does not include, unless noted otherwise, any shares of common stock issuable upon the conversion of any outstanding convertible senior notes or Restricted Stock Units (“RSUs”). All share amounts reflect the 1-for-10 Reverse Stock Split, effective July 9, 2020. |
(5) |
The address of Oasis Management Company Ltd. is c/o Oasis Management (Hong Kong) LLC, 21/F Man Yee Building, 68 Des Voeux Road, Central, Hong Kong. Possesses shared voting and dispositive power of such shares. Does not include 2,101,423 shares of common stock underlying convertible senior notes. If all such notes were currently converted this beneficial owner would own 28.5% of the outstanding stock. Information presented in this Item with respect to this beneficial owner was extracted from the Schedule 13D/A filed on May 16, 2019. |
(6) |
The address of Hong Kong Meisheng Culture Company Ltd is Room 1901, 19/F, Lee Garden One, 33 Hysan Avenue, Causeway Bay, Hong Kong. Zhao Xiaoqiang, executive director of this entity, is a director of the Company. Possesses shared voting and dispositive power with respect to all of such shares. All the information presented in this Item with respect to this beneficial owner was extracted solely from the Schedule 13D/A filed on January 26, 2018. |
(7) |
The address of Benefit Street Partners, L.L.C. is c/o Benefit Street Partners L.L.C., 9 West 57th Street, Suite 4920, New York, NY 10019. Possesses shared voting and dispositive power with respect to all of such shares. Does not include 1,952,072 shares of common stock underlying convertible senior notes. If all such notes were currently converted this beneficial owner would own 27.9% of the outstanding stock. Information presented in this Item with respect to this beneficial owner was extracted solely from the Schedule 13D filed on March 3, 2021. |
(8) |
The address of Mr. Rosen is 1578 Sussex Turnpike (Bldg. 5), Randolph, NJ 07869. Possesses shared voting and dispositive power with respect to all of such shares. All the information presented in this Item with respect to this beneficial owner was extracted solely from the Schedule 13G/A filed on March 3, 2021. |
(9) |
All of such shares were issued pursuant to the terms of Mr. Berman’s January 1, 2003 Employment Agreement (as amended to date) and all of such shares are subject to the terms of Restricted Stock Award Agreements with Mr. Berman (the “Berman Agreements”). The Berman Agreements provide that Mr. Berman will forfeit his rights to up to 232,222 shares unless certain performance conditions are met, as described in the Berman Agreements, whereupon the forfeited shares will become authorized but unissued shares of our common stock and 160,828 shares are subject to vesting over time. Unvested shares have no voting rights and may not be sold, mortgaged, pledged, transferred or otherwise encumbered prior to vesting. Certain of these shares may be restricted from transfer pursuant to the minimum stock ownership provisions adopted by the Company's Board of Directors. |
(10) |
Does not include 125,691 shares underlying currently unvested restricted stock units (“RSUs”) which will vest pursuant to the terms of Mr. Kimble’s November 18, 2019 Employment Agreement, which RSUs are further subject to the terms of our Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreements with Mr. Kimble. Certain of these shares may be restricted from transfer pursuant to the minimum stock ownership provisions adopted by the Company's Board of Directors. |
(11) |
All of such shares were issued pursuant to the terms of Mr. McGrath’s March 4, 2010 Employment Agreement (as amended to date) and all of such shares are subject to the terms of Restricted Stock Award Agreements with Mr. McGrath (the “McGrath Agreements”). The McGrath Agreements provide that Mr. McGrath will forfeit his rights to up to 66,351shares unless certain performance conditions are met, as described in the McGrath Agreements, whereupon the forfeited shares will become authorized but unissued shares of our common stock and 48,466 shares are subject to vesting over time. Unvested shares have no voting rights and may not be sold, mortgaged, pledged, transferred or otherwise encumbered prior to vesting. Certain of these shares may be restricted from transfer pursuant to the minimum stock ownership provisions adopted by the Company's Board of Directors. |
(12) |
Consists of 12,564 shares of common stock issued pursuant to our 2002 Stock Award and Incentive Plan (the “2002 Plan”). Certain of these shares may be restricted from transfer pursuant to the minimum stock ownership provisions adopted by the Company's Board of Directors. Does not include the 2,325,227 shares (including shares underlying convertible senior notes) owned by Oasis Management Company Ltd. reported above, of which entity Alex Shoghi is a portfolio manager. |
(13) |
Consists of 9,629 shares of common stock issued pursuant to our 2002 Plan. Certain of these shares may be restricted from transfer pursuant to the minimum stock ownership provisions adopted by the Company's Board of Directors. Does not include the 523,954 shares owned by Hong Kong Meisheng Cultural Company Limited reported above, of which entity Zhao Xiaoqiang is executive director. |
(14) |
Does not include any shares underlying RSUs. Does not include the 523,954 shares owned by Hong Kong Meisheng Cultural Company Limited reported above, of which entity Zhao Xiaoqiang is executive director, or the 2,278,508 shares reported above as owned by Oasis Management Company Ltd, of which entity Alex Shoghi is a portfolio manager, or the 2,188,364 shares reported above as owned by Benefit Street Partners, L.L.C., of which entity Matthew Winkler is a managing director. |
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence
(a) Transactions with Related Persons
A former director of the Company, who resigned on August 9, 2019 is a partner in a law firm that acts as counsel to the Company. The Company incurred legal fees and expenses to the law firm in the amount of approximately $1.5 million in 2019 and $1.3 million in 2018. As of December 31, 2019, legal fees and reimbursable expenses of $0.1 million was payable to this law firm.
The owner of NantWorks, the Company’s DreamPlay Toys joint venture partner, beneficially owned more than 5.0% of the Company’s outstanding common stock. Pursuant to the joint venture agreements, the Company is obligated to pay NantWorks a preferred return on joint venture sales. This agreement expired on September 30, 2018. The owner of NantWorks sold all of its holdings of the Company's shares on December 30, 2019.
In November 2014, the Company entered into a joint venture with Meisheng Cultural & Creative Corp., Ltd., for the purpose of providing certain JAKKS licensed and non-licensed toys and consumer products to agreed-upon territories of the People’s Republic of China. The joint venture includes a subsidiary in the Shanghai Free Trade Zone that sells, distributes and markets these products, which include dolls, plush, role play products, action figures, costumes, seasonal items, technology and app-enhanced toys, based on top entertainment licenses and JAKKS’ own proprietary brands. The Company owns fifty-one percent of the joint venture and consolidates the joint venture since control rests with the Company. The non-controlling interest’s share of the income (loss) from the joint venture for the year ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018 was $130,000, $169,000 and ($57,000), respectively.
In October 2016, the Company entered into a joint venture with Hong Kong Meisheng Cultural Company Limited (“Meisheng”), a Hong Kong-based subsidiary of Meisheng Culture & Creative Corp, for the purpose of creating and developing original, multiplatform content for children including new short-form series and original shows. JAKKS and Meisheng each own fifty percent of the joint venture and will jointly own the content. JAKKS will retain merchandising rights for kids’ consumer products in all markets except China, which Meisheng Culture & Creative Corp. will oversee through the Company’s existing distribution joint venture. The results of operations of the joint venture are consolidated with the Company’s results. The non-controlling interest’s share of the loss from the joint venture for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019, and 2018 was nil. As of December 31, 2020, Meisheng beneficially owns 9.2% of the Company’s outstanding common stock.
In March 2017, the Company entered into an agreement to issue 366,089 shares of its common stock at an aggregate price of $19.3 million to a Hong Kong affiliate of its China joint venture partner. After their shareholder and China regulatory approval, the transaction closed on April 27, 2017. Upon the closing, the Company added a representative of Meisheng Culture & Creative Corp as a non-employee director and issued 1,332 shares of restricted stock at a value of $0.1 million, which vested in January 2018. In 2018, the Company issued 4,158 shares of restricted stock at a value of $0.1 million to the non-employee director, which vested in January 2019. In 2019, the Company issued 5,471 shares of restricted stock at a value of $0.1 million to the non-employee director, which vested in January 2020.
Meisheng also serves as a significant manufacturer of the Company. In the first quarter of 2019, Meisheng acquired New Time Group, which was a third-party manufacturer of the Company. For the year ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018, the Company made inventory-related payments to Meisheng of approximately $64.8 million, $94.3 million, and $36.2 million respectively. As of December 31, 2020 and 2019, amounts due to Meisheng for inventory received by the Company, but not paid totaled $10.1 million and $18.1 million, respectively.
A director of the Company is a portfolio manager at Oasis Management. In August 2017, the Company agreed with Oasis Management and Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd., the holder of approximately $21.6 million face amount of its 4.25% convertible senior notes due in 2018, to exchange and extend the maturity date of these notes to November 1, 2020. The transaction closed on November 7, 2017. In July 2018, the Company closed a transaction with Oasis Management and Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd., to exchange $8.0 million face amount of the 4.25% convertible senior notes due in August 2018 with convertible senior notes similar to those issued in November 2017. In August 2019, the Company entered into the Recapitalization Transaction. In connection with the Recapitalization Transaction, the Company issued (i) amended and restated notes with respect to the $21.6 million Oasis Note issued on November 7, 2017, and the $8.0 million Oasis Note issued on July 26, 2018, and (ii) a new $8.0 million convertible senior note having the same terms as such amended and restated notes. Interest on the New Oasis Notes is payable on each May 1 and November 1 until maturity and accrues at an annual rate of (i) 3.25% if paid in cash or 5.00% if paid in stock plus (ii) 2.75% payable in kind. The New Oasis Notes mature 91 days after the amounts outstanding under the New Term Loan are paid in full, and in no event later than July 3, 2023.
A director of the Company is a director at Benefit Street Partners. As of December 31, 2020, Benefit Street Partners held $61.1 million in principal amount (including $2.3 million in payment-in-kind interest) of the New Term Loan. On February 5, 2021, Benefit Street Partners and Oasis Investment II Master Funds Ltd, both related parties, entered into a purchase and sale agreement wherein Benefit Street Partners purchased $11.0 million of principal amount, plus all accrued and unpaid interest thereon, of the New Oasis Notes from Oasis Investment II Master Funds Ltd. The transaction closed on February 8, 2021 (see Item 8 "Consolidated Financial Statements and Supplementary Data Note 10 - Debt”).
A director of the Company is the managing Partner and portfolio manager at Axar Capital Management. As of December 31, 2020, Axar Capital Management held $24.3 million in principal amount (including $0.9 million in payment-in-kind interest) of the New Term Loan.
(b) Review, Approval or Ratification of Transactions with Related Persons
Pursuant to our Ethical Code of Conduct (a copy of which may be found on our website, www.jakks.com), all of our employees are required to disclose to our General Counsel, the Board of Directors or any committee established by the Board of Directors to receive such information, any material transaction or relationship that reasonably could be expected to give rise to actual or apparent conflicts of interest between any of them, personally, and us. In addition, our Ethical Code of Conduct also directs all employees to avoid any self-interested transactions without full disclosure. This policy, which applies to all of our employees, is reiterated in our Employee Handbook which states that a violation of this policy could be grounds for termination. In approving or rejecting a proposed transaction, our General Counsel, Board of Directors or designated committee will consider the facts and circumstances available and deemed relevant, including but not limited to, the risks, costs and benefits to us, the terms of the transactions, the availability of other sources for comparable services or products, and, if applicable, the impact on director independence. Upon concluding their review, they will only approve those agreements that, in light of known circumstances, are in or are not inconsistent with, our best interests, as they determine in good faith.
(c) Director Independence
For a description of our Board of Directors and its compliance with the independence requirements therefore as promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission and Nasdaq, see “Item 10- Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance.”
Item 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services
Before our principal accountant is engaged by us to render audit or non-audit services, as required by the rules and regulations promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission and/or Nasdaq, such engagement is approved by the Audit Committee.
The following are the fees of BDO USA, LLP, our principal accountant, for the two years ended December 31, 2020, for services rendered in connection with the audit for those respective years (all of which have been pre-approved by the Audit Committee):
2020 |
2019 |
|||||||
Audit Fees |
$ | 1,201,087 | $ | 1,402,320 | ||||
Audit Related Fees |
25,200 | 37,500 | ||||||
$ | 1,226,287 | $ | 1,439,820 |
Audit Fees consist of the aggregate fees for professional services rendered for the audit of our annual financial statements and the reviews of the financial statements included in our Forms 10-Q and for any other services that were normally provided by our auditors in connection with our statutory and regulatory filings or engagements.
Audit Related Fees consist of the aggregate fees billed for professional services rendered for assurance and related services that were reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of our financial statements and were not otherwise included in Audit Fees. These fees primarily relate to audits of employee benefit plans.
Our Audit Committee has considered whether the provision of the non-audit services described above is compatible with maintaining our auditors’ independence and determined that such services are appropriate.
PART IV
Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules
The following documents are filed as part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K:
(1) |
Financial Statements (included in Item 8): |
● |
Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm |
● |
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2020 and 2019 |
● |
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018 |
● |
Consolidated Statements of Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018 |
● |
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018 |
● |
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018 |
● |
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements |
(2) |
Financial Statement Schedules (included in Item 8): |
● |
Schedule II — Valuation and Qualifying Accounts |
(3) |
Exhibits: |
10.14* |
||
10.14.1 |
Consent and Amendment No. 3 to Amended and Restated Credit Agreement (35) |
|
10.15* |
||
10.15.1 |
Amendment No. 2 to First Lien Term Loan Facility Credit Agreement (35) |
|
10.16 |
||
10.17 |
||
10.18 |
||
10.19* |
||
14 |
||
21 |
||
23.1 |
||
31.1 |
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Stephen G. Berman (**) |
|
31.2 |
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of John L. Kimble (**) |
|
32.1 |
||
32.2 |
||
101.INS |
Inline XBRL Instance Document |
|
101.SCH |
Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document |
|
101.CAL |
Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document |
|
101.DEF |
Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document |
|
101.LAB |
Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document |
|
101.PRE |
Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document |
|
104 | Cover Page Interactive Data File (formatted as Inline XBRL and contained in Exhibit 101) |
(1) |
Filed previously as Appendix 2 to the Company’s Schedule 14A Proxy Statement, filed August 23, 2002, and incorporated herein by reference. |
(2) |
Filed previously as an exhibit to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed October 21, 2011, and incorporated herein by reference. |
(3) |
Filed previously as an exhibit to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed July 24, 2013 and incorporated herein by reference. |
(4) |
Filed previously as Appendix A to the Company’s Schedule 14A Proxy Statement, filed June 23, 1998, and incorporated herein by reference |
(5) |
Filed previously as an exhibit to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 (Reg. No. 333-90055), filed November 1, 1999, and incorporated herein by reference. |
(6) |
Filed previously as an exhibit to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 (Reg. No. 333-40392), filed June 29, 2000, and incorporated herein by reference. |
(7) |
Filed previously as Appendix B to the Company’s Schedule 14A Proxy Statement, filed June 11, 2001, and incorporated herein by reference. |
(8) |
Filed previously as an exhibit to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 (Reg. No. 333-101665), filed December 5, 2002, and incorporated herein by reference. |
(9) |
Filed previously as an exhibit to the Company’s Schedule 14A Proxy Statement, filed August 20, 2008, and incorporated herein by reference. |
(10) |
Filed previously as an exhibit to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed April 2, 2014 and incorporated herein by reference. |
(11) |
Filed previously as an exhibit to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed November 17, 2010, and incorporated herein by reference. |
(12) |
Filed previously as an exhibit to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed October 21, 2011, and incorporated herein by reference. |
(13) |
Filed previously as an exhibit to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed September 25, 2012, and incorporated herein by reference. |
(14) |
Filed previously as an exhibit to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for its fiscal year ended December 31, 1999, filed March 30, 2000, and incorporated herein by reference. |
(15) |
Filed previously as an exhibit to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed February 20, 2014, and incorporated herein by reference. |
(16) |
Filed previously as an exhibit to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed August 24, 2011, and incorporated herein by reference. |
(17) |
Filed previously as an exhibit to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed May 21, 2013, and incorporated herein by reference. |
(18) |
Filed previously as an exhibit to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for its fiscal year ended December 31, 2003, filed March 15, 2004, and incorporated herein by reference. |
(19) |
Filed previously as an exhibit to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed June 9, 2014 and incorporated herein by reference. |
(20) |
Filed previously as an exhibit to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed June 16, 2015 and incorporated herein by reference. |
(21) |
Filed previously as an exhibit to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed June 9, 2016 and incorporated herein by reference. |
(22) |
Filed previously as an exhibit to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed September 30, 2016 and incorporated herein by reference. |
(23) |
Filed previously as an exhibit to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed December 29, 2017 and incorporated herein by reference. |
(24) |
Filed previously as an exhibit to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed November 11, 2017 and incorporated herein by reference. |
(25) |
Filed previously as an exhibit to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed July 26, 2018 and incorporated herein by reference. |
(26) |
Filed previously as an exhibit to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed April 2, 2018 and incorporated herein by reference. |
(27) |
Filed previously as an exhibit to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed June 15, 2018 and incorporated herein by reference. |
(28) |
Filed previously as an exhibit to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed August 9, 2019 and incorporated herein by reference. |
(29) |
Filed previously as an exhibit to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed January 2, 2020 and incorporated herein by reference. |
(30) |
Filed previously as an exhibit to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed November 20, 2019 and incorporated herein by reference. |
(31) |
Filed previously as an exhibit to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed September 23, 2019 and incorporated herein by reference. |
(32) |
Filed previously as an annex to the Company’s Schedule 14A filed October 28, 2019 and incorporated herein by reference. |
(33) |
Filed previously as an exhibit to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for its fiscal year ended December 31, 2018, filed March 18, 2019, and incorporated herein by reference. |
(34) |
Filed previously as an exhibit to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed July 9, 2020 and incorporated herein by reference. |
(35) |
Filed previously as an exhibit to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed October 19, 2020 and incorporated herein by reference. |
(36) |
Filed previously as an exhibit to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed February 19, 2021 and incorporated herein by reference. |
(*) |
Certain schedules have been omitted pursuant to Item 601(a)(5) of Regulation S-K under the Securities Act. The Company agrees to furnish supplementally any omitted schedules to the Securities and Exchange Commission upon request. |
(**) |
Filed herewith. |
Item 16. Form 10-K Summary
None.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
Dated: March 19, 2021 |
JAKKS PACIFIC, INC. |
|
By: |
/s/ STEPHEN G. BERMAN |
|
Stephen G. Berman |
||
Chief Executive Officer |
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
Signature |
Title |
Date |
||
/s/ STEPHEN G. BERMAN |
Director and |
March 19, 2021 |
||
Stephen G. Berman |
Chief Executive Officer |
|||
Chief Financial Officer |
||||
/s/ JOHN L. KIMBLE |
(Principal Financial Officer and |
March 19, 2021 |
||
John L. Kimble |
Principal Accounting Officer) |
|||
/s/ CAROLE LEVINE |
Director |
March 19, 2021 |
||
Carole Levine |
||||
/s/ JOSHUA CASCADE |
Director |
March 19, 2021 |
||
Joshua Cascade |
||||
/s/ MATTHEW WINKLER |
Director |
March 19, 2021 |
||
Matthew Winkler |
||||
/s/ ALEXANDER SHOGHI |
Director |
March 19, 2021 |
||
Alexander Shoghi |
||||
/s/ ANDREW AXELROD |
Director |
March 19, 2021 |
||
Andrew Axelrod |
||||
/s/ ZHAO XIAOQIANG |
Director |
March 19, 2021 |
||
Zhao Xiaoqiang |
||||