-----BEGIN PRIVACY-ENHANCED MESSAGE-----
Proc-Type: 2001,MIC-CLEAR
Originator-Name: webmaster@www.sec.gov
Originator-Key-Asymmetric:
MFgwCgYEVQgBAQICAf8DSgAwRwJAW2sNKK9AVtBzYZmr6aGjlWyK3XmZv3dTINen
TWSM7vrzLADbmYQaionwg5sDW3P6oaM5D3tdezXMm7z1T+B+twIDAQAB
MIC-Info: RSA-MD5,RSA,
OzZKguhn+PG8VyCU4+yXqeLeC2TqnoBNNmZJ9CXdQM2EMwzk5tifCTG1eolKflFU
0bz30kZ0XOzseUQxYokDKg==
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549 FORM 10-Q
[X] QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2002
OR
[ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from ________to _________
Commission file number 0-20725
SIEBEL SYSTEMS, INC.
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
2207 Bridgepointe Parkway
(650) 477-5000
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required
to be filed by Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant
was required to file reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing
requirements for the past 90 days. YES [X] NO [ ]
The number of shares outstanding of the registrant's common stock, par value
$.001 per share, as of July 17, 2002, was 477,914,877.
SIEBEL SYSTEMS, INC.
Part I. Financial Information
Part II. Other Information
Part I. Financial Information
Item 1. Financial Statements.
SIEBEL SYSTEMS, INC.
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
SIEBEL SYSTEMS, INC.
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
SIEBEL SYSTEMS, INC.
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
SIEBEL SYSTEMS, INC.
San Mateo, CA 94404
(Address of principal executive offices, including zip code)
(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)
FORM 10-Q
For the Quarterly Period Ended June 30, 2002
Table of Contents
ITEM 1. Financial Statements
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of
December 31, 2001 and June 30, 2002
Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income
for the three and six months ended June 30, 2001 and 2002
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
for the six months ended June 30, 2001 and 2002
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
ITEM 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations
ITEM 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
ITEM 1. Legal Proceedings
ITEM 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
ITEM 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K
Signatures
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(in thousands; unaudited)
December 31, June 30,
2001 2002
------------ ------------
Assets
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents........................................... $ 799,090 $ 868,298
Short-term investments.............................................. 857,565 1,137,681
------------ ------------
Total cash, cash equivalents, and short-term investments..... 1,656,655 2,005,979
Marketable equity securities........................................ 8,254 6,080
Accounts receivable, net............................................ 396,297 358,932
Deferred income taxes............................................... 58,131 58,832
Prepaids and other.................................................. 70,766 52,087
------------ ------------
Total current assets......................................... 2,190,103 2,481,910
Property and equipment, net............................................ 353,242 341,340
Goodwill............................................................... 72,869 78,824
Intangible assets, net................................................. 19,000 14,555
Other assets........................................................... 56,905 42,428
Deferred income taxes.................................................. 52,725 52,725
------------ ------------
Total assets................................................. $ 2,744,844 $ 3,011,782
============ ============
Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable.................................................... $ 14,395 $ 22,009
Accrued expenses.................................................... 350,282 357,913
Deferred revenue.................................................... 241,017 277,222
------------ ------------
Total current liabilities.................................... 605,694 657,144
Capital lease obligations.............................................. 3,048 17,765
Convertible subordinated debentures.................................... 300,000 300,000
------------ ------------
Total liabilities............................................ 908,742 974,909
------------ ------------
Commitments and contingencies
Stockholders' equity:
Common stock; $0.001 par value; 2,000,000 shares authorized;
466,950 and 477,024 shares issued and outstanding, respectively... 467 477
Additional paid-in capital........................................... 1,357,422 1,448,686
Notes receivable from stockholders................................... (422) --
Deferred compensation................................................ (8,362) (5,068)
Accumulated other comprehensive income............................... 6,174 17,559
Retained earnings.................................................... 480,823 575,219
------------ ------------
Total stockholders' equity................................... 1,836,102 2,036,873
------------ ------------
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity................... $ 2,744,844 $ 3,011,782
============ ============
Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income
(in thousands, except per share data; unaudited)
Three Months Ended Six Months Ended
June 30, June 30,
--------------------- ----------------------
2001 2002 2001 2002
--------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Revenues:
Software............................................. $ 286,839 $ 170,109 $ 621,940 $ 416,156
Professional services, maintenance and other......... 273,313 235,453 536,962 467,253
--------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Total revenues................................... 560,152 405,562 1,158,902 883,409
--------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Cost of revenues:
Software............................................. 4,462 5,282 8,823 10,577
Professional services, maintenance and other......... 159,533 119,319 332,208 245,333
--------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Total cost of revenues........................... 163,995 124,601 341,031 255,910
--------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Gross margin..................................... 396,157 280,961 817,871 627,499
--------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Operating expenses:
Product development.................................. 49,475 50,303 97,608 99,367
Sales and marketing.................................. 193,378 150,648 405,337 315,993
General and administrative........................... 42,382 42,794 96,608 84,545
--------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Total operating expenses......................... 285,235 243,745 599,553 499,905
--------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Operating income................................. 110,922 37,216 218,318 127,594
Other income, net....................................... 10,596 9,307 25,295 19,900
--------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Income before income taxes....................... 121,518 46,523 243,613 147,494
Income taxes............................................ 44,961 16,748 90,135 53,098
--------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Net income ...................................... $ 76,557 $ 29,775 $ 153,478 $ 94,396
========= ========== ========== ==========
Diluted net income per share............................ $ 0.15 $ 0.06 $ 0.29 $ 0.18
========= ========== ========== ==========
Basic net income per share.............................. $ 0.17 $ 0.06 $ 0.34 $ 0.20
========= ========== ========== ==========
Shares used in diluted share computation................ 522,758 524,920 521,846 537,126
========= ========== ========== ==========
Shares used in basic share computation.................. 455,352 474,211 451,682 472,353
========= ========== ========== ==========
Comprehensive income:
Net income ............................................. $ 76,557 $ 29,775 $ 153,478 $ 94,396
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax:
Foreign currency translation adjustments............. (1,801) 14,802 (6,669) 12,539
Realized (gain) loss previously recognized in other
comprehensive income.............................. (598) (2,478) (1,774) (4,730)
Unrealized gain (loss) on investments................ 562 6,744 (2,017) 3,576
--------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Other comprehensive income (loss)................ (1,837) 19,068 (10,460) 11,385
--------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Total comprehensive income....................... $ 74,720 $ 48,843 $ 143,018 $ 105,781
========= ========== ========== ==========
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(in thousands; unaudited)
Six Months Ended
June 30,
--------------------
2001 2002
--------- ---------
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income.............................................................. $ 153,478 $ 94,396
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash
provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and other amortization.................................. 34,327 66,997
Amortization of goodwill............................................. 10,237 --
Amortization of identifiable intangible assets....................... 2,982 4,445
Compensation related to stock options, net........................... 2,803 2,938
Provision for doubtful accounts and returns.......................... 17,931 11,712
Tax benefit from exercise of stock options........................... 47,800 10,000
Deferred income taxes................................................ (201) 497
Write-down of cost-method investments to fair value.................. 2,410 2,508
Net gains on short-term investments and marketable equity securities. (1,774) (4,730)
Exchange of software for cost-method investments..................... (971) --
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable............................................... 48,653 25,653
Prepaids and other................................................ 12,729 18,679
Accounts payable and accrued expenses............................. 3,902 9,546
Deferred revenue.................................................. 48,421 36,205
--------- ---------
Net cash provided by operating activities....................... 382,727 278,846
--------- ---------
Cash flows from investing activities:
Purchases of property and equipment..................................... (172,444) (49,158)
Purchases of short-term investments..................................... (583,775) (886,484)
Sales and maturities of short-term investments.......................... 328,700 605,735
Purchases of marketable equity securities............................... -- (1,000)
Proceeds from sale of marketable equity securities...................... 714 853
Purchase consideration for acquired businesses, net of cash received.... 9,484 (500)
Other non-operating assets and non-marketable securities................ (8,442) 11,364
Repayments from (advances to) affiliate, net............................ 10,579 --
--------- ---------
Net cash used in investing activities........................... (415,184) (319,190)
--------- ---------
Cash flows from financing activities:
Proceeds from issuance of common stock, net of repurchases.............. 118,492 76,152
Proceeds from equipment financing....................................... -- 24,873
Repayments of capital lease obligations................................. -- (4,457)
Repayments of stockholder notes......................................... 795 422
--------- ---------
Net cash provided by financing activities....................... 119,287 96,990
--------- ---------
Effect of exchange rate fluctuations on cash and cash equivalents.......... (6,669) 12,562
--------- ---------
Change in cash and cash equivalents........................................ 80,161 69,208
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period............................. 751,384 799,090
--------- ---------
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period................................... $ 831,545 $ 868,298
========= =========
Supplemental disclosures of cash flows information:
Cash paid for interest.................................................. $ 8,493 $ 9,233
========= =========
Cash paid for income taxes.............................................. $ 8,934 $ 15,608
========= =========
Supplemental disclosures of non-cash activities:
Common stock and stock options issued for acquisitions.................. $ 28,235 $ 5,478
========= =========
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
The Company
Siebel Systems, Inc. ("Siebel" or the "Company") is a leading provider of eBusiness applications software. Siebel eBusiness Applications are a family of leading Web applications software that enables an organization to better manage its most important relationships: its customer, partner and employee relationships. Siebel eBusiness Applications are designed to meet the information system requirements needed to manage these relationships for organizations of all sizes, from small businesses to the largest multinational organizations and government agencies. Our customer relationship management applications enable an organization to sell to, market to, and service its customers across multiple channels, including the Web, call centers, field, resellers, and retail and dealer networks. Our partner relationship management applications unite the organization's partners, resellers and customers in one global information system to facilitate greater collaboration and increased revenues, productivity, and customer satisfaction. Our employee relationship management applications enable an organization to drive employee and organizational performance and increase employee satisfaction through the support of each stage of the employee life cycle. By deploying the comprehensive functionality of Siebel eBusiness Applications to better manage their customer, partner and employee relationships, many of our customers have achieved high levels of satisfaction from these constituencies and continue to be competitive in their markets.
Basis of Presentation
The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared on substantially the same basis as the audited consolidated financial statements included in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001, and in the opinion of management include all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments, necessary for their fair presentation. All amounts included herein related to the financial statements as of June 30, 2002, and the three and six months ended June 30, 2001 and 2002, are unaudited. The interim results presented are not necessarily indicative of results for any subsequent quarter or for the year ending December 31, 2002.
Principles of Consolidation
The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly owned subsidiaries. All intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated.
Use of Estimates
The Company's unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. The preparation of these financial statements requires that the Company make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. On an ongoing basis, the Company evaluates its estimates, including those related to revenue recognition, provision for doubtful accounts and returns, fair value of investments, fair value of acquired intangible assets and goodwill, useful lives of intangible assets and property and equipment, income taxes, and contingencies and litigation, among others. The Company bases its estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results could differ significantly from the estimates made by management with respect to these items and other items that require management's estimates.
Foreign Currency Translation
The Company considers the functional currency of its foreign subsidiaries to be the local currency, and accordingly, the foreign currency is translated into U.S. dollars using exchange rates in effect at period end for assets and liabilities and average exchange rates during each reporting period for the results of operations. Adjustments resulting from translation of foreign subsidiary financial statements are reported in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss). Gains or losses on foreign currency transactions are recognized in current operations and have not been significant to the Company's operating results in any period presented.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The fair value of the Company's cash, cash equivalents, short-term investments, accounts receivable and accounts payable approximate their respective carrying amounts. Based on the quoted market price of the convertible subordinated debentures, the fair value of the convertible subordinated debentures was $298,920,000 as of June 30, 2002. The fair value of the Company's derivative financial instruments (i.e., foreign exchange contracts) was $8,312,000 as of June 30, 2002.
Cash, Cash Equivalents, Short-Term Investments and Marketable Equity Securities
The Company considers all highly liquid investments with an original maturity of 90 days or less at the date of purchase to be cash equivalents. Short-term investments generally consist of highly liquid securities with original maturities in excess of 90 days. Marketable equity securities include the Company's investment in publicly traded companies in the high technology industry. The Company has classified its short-term investments and marketable equity securities as "available-for-sale." Such investments are carried at fair value with unrealized gains and losses, net of related tax effects, reported within accumulated other comprehensive income (loss). Realized gains and losses on available-for-sale securities are computed using the specific identification method.
The Company reviews the carrying value of its short-term investments and marketable equity securities, along with investments accounted for under the cost method, at the end of each reporting period to determine if any investments are impaired. This review includes an evaluation of historical and projected financial performance, expected cash needs and recent funding events. Other-than-temporary impairments are recognized in earnings if the market value of the investment is below its current carrying value for an extended period, which the Company generally defines as six to nine months, or the issuer has experienced significant financial declines or difficulties in raising capital to continue operations. Other-than-temporary impairments recognized in other income, net totaled $1,738,000 and $2,410,000 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2001, respectively. Other-than-temporary impairments recognized in other income, net totaled $3,151,000 for both the three and six months ended June 30, 2002.
Concentrations of Credit Risk
Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to a concentration of credit risk principally consist of trade accounts receivable. The Company performs ongoing credit evaluations of its customers and generally does not require collateral on accounts receivable, as the majority of the Company's customers are large, well-established companies. The Company maintains reserves for potential credit losses, but historically has not experienced any significant losses related to any particular industry or geographic area since the Company's business is not concentrated on any one particular customer or customer base. No single customer accounts for more than 10% of revenues, and the Company's customers, which are primarily in the high technology, telecommunications, financial services (including insurance), pharmaceutical, utilities and consumer packaged goods industries, are sufficiently diverse that the Company does not consider itself significantly exposed to concentrations of credit risk.
Property and Equipment
Property and equipment are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation and amortization. Capital lease amortization is included with depreciation expense and the associated accumulated amortization is included with accumulated depreciation in the accompanying financial statements. Depreciation and amortization are calculated using the straight-line method over the shorter of the estimated useful lives of the respective assets, generally three to five years, or the lease term, if applicable. Leasehold improvements are amortized over the lesser of the lease term or the estimated useful lives of the improvements, generally seven years. Expenditures for maintenance and repairs are charged to expense as incurred. Cost and accumulated depreciation of assets sold or retired are removed from the respective property accounts, and the gain or loss is reflected in the statement of operations.
Intangible Assets and Goodwill
The Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued SFAS No. 141 "Business Combinations" ("SFAS 141") and SFAS No. 142 "Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets" ("SFAS 142") in July 2001. SFAS 141 requires that all business combinations be accounted for using the purchase method, thereby prohibiting the pooling-of-interests method. SFAS 141 also specifies criteria for recognizing and reporting intangible assets apart from goodwill; however, assembled workforce must be recognized and reported in goodwill. SFAS 142 requires that intangible assets with an indefinite life should not be amortized until their life is determined to be finite, and all other intangible assets must be amortized over their useful life. SFAS 142 also requires that goodwill not be amortized but instead tested for impairment in accordance with the provisions of SFAS 142 at least annually and more frequently upon the occurrence of certain events (see "Impairment of Long-Lived Assets" below).
The Company adopted certain provisions of these pronouncements effective July 1, 2001, as required for goodwill and intangible assets acquired in purchase business combinations consummated after June 30, 2001. The Company adopted the remaining provisions of SFAS 141 and SFAS 142 effective January 1, 2002. There was not a cumulative transition adjustment upon adoption as of July 1, 2001 or January 1, 2002. SFAS 141 and SFAS 142 required the Company to perform the following as of January 1, 2002: (i) review goodwill and intangible assets for possible reclasses; (ii) reassess the lives of intangible assets; and (iii) perform a transitional goodwill impairment test. The Company has reviewed the balances of goodwill and identifiable intangibles and determined that the Company does not have any amounts that are required to be reclassed from goodwill to identifiable intangibles, or vice versa. The Company has also reviewed the useful lives of its identifiable intangible assets and determined that the original estimated lives remain appropriate. The Company has completed the transitional goodwill impairment test and has determined that the Company did not have a transitional impairment of goodwill.
As required by SFAS 142, the Company has not amortized goodwill associated with acquisitions completed after June 30, 2001, for any period presented and ceased amortization of goodwill associated with acquisitions completed prior to July 1, 2001, effective January 1, 2002. Prior to January 1, 2002, the Company amortized goodwill associated with the pre-July 1, 2001 acquisitions over three to five years using the straight-line method. Identifiable intangibles (acquired technology) are currently amortized over three years using the straight-line method. Refer to Note 2 for further discussion of the Company's intangible assets and goodwill.
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets
The Company tests goodwill for impairment in accordance with SFAS 142. SFAS 142 requires that goodwill be tested for impairment at the "reporting unit level" ("Reporting Unit") at least annually and more frequently upon the occurrence of certain events, as defined by SFAS 142. Consistent with the Company's determination that it has only one reporting segment, the Company has determined that it has only one Reporting Unit, specifically the license, implementation and support of its software applications. Goodwill is tested for impairment annually on July 1 in a two-step process. First, the Company determines if the carrying amount of its Reporting Unit exceeds the "fair value" of the Reporting Unit, which would indicate that goodwill may be impaired. If the Company determines that goodwill may be impaired, the Company compares the "implied fair value" of the goodwill, as defined by SFAS 142, to its carrying amount to determine if there is an impairment loss. The Company does not have any goodwill that it considers to be impaired.
On January 1, 2002, the Company adopted SFAS No. 144 "Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets" ("SFAS 144"), which supersedes certain provisions of APB Opinion No. 30 "Reporting the Results of Operations - Reporting the Effects of Disposal of a Segment of a Business, and Extraordinary, Unusual and Infrequently Occurring Events and Transactions" and supersedes SFAS No. 121 "Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to Be Disposed Of." There was not a cumulative transition adjustment upon adoption. In accordance with SFAS 144, the Company evaluates long-lived assets, including intangible assets other than goodwill, for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of an asset may not be recoverable based on expected undiscounted cash flows attributable to that asset. The amount of any impairment is measured as the difference between the carrying value and the fair value of the impaired asset. The Company does not have any long-lived assets it considers to be impaired as of June 30, 2002; however, as part of the Company's restructuring of its operations and associated workforce reduction announced on July 17, 2002, the Company may abandon or sell certain long-lived assets, primarily computer equipment, furniture and fixtures, and leasehold improvements, at less than their carrying value. Please refer to Note 8 for further discussion of the potential impairment charge to be recorded in the second half of 2002.
Employee Stock Option and Purchase Plans
The Company accounts for its employee stock-based compensation plans using the intrinsic value method. As such, deferred compensation is recorded on the date of grant if the current market price of the underlying stock exceeds the exercise price. The Company records and measures deferred compensation for options granted to non-employees at their fair value. Deferred compensation is expensed on a straight-line basis over the vesting period of the stock option.
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities
On January 1, 2001, the Company adopted SFAS No. 133, "Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities" ("SFAS 133"). There was not a cumulative transition adjustment upon adoption on January 1, 2001. SFAS 133 establishes accounting and reporting standards for derivative instruments and hedging activities and requires that all derivatives be recognized as either assets or liabilities at fair value. If certain conditions are met, a derivative may be specifically designated and accounted for as (a) a hedge of the exposure to changes in the fair value of a recognized asset or liability or an unrecognized firm commitment; (b) a hedge of the exposure to variable cash flows of a forecasted transaction; or (c) a hedge of the foreign currency exposure of a net investment in a foreign operation, an unrecognized firm commitment, an available-for-sale security, or a foreign-currency-denominated forecasted transaction. Derivatives or portions of derivatives that are not designated as hedging instruments are adjusted to fair value through earnings in the period of change in their fair value.
The Company operates internationally and thus is exposed to potential adverse changes in currency exchange rates. The Company has entered into foreign exchange contracts to reduce its exposure to foreign currency rate changes on receivables, payables and intercompany balances denominated in a non-functional currency. The objective of these contracts is to neutralize the impact of currency exchange rate movements on the Company's operating results. These contracts require the Company to exchange currencies at rates agreed upon at the contract's inception. These contracts reduce the exposure to fluctuations in exchange rate movements because the gains and losses associated with foreign currency balances and transactions are generally offset with the gains and losses of the foreign exchange contracts. Because the impact of movements in currency exchange rates on forward contracts offsets the related impact on the underlying items being hedged, these financial instruments help alleviate the risk that might otherwise result from certain changes in currency exchange rates. The Company does not designate its foreign exchange forward contracts as hedges and, accordingly, the Company adjusts these instruments to fair value through earnings. The Company does not hold or issue financial instruments for speculative or trading purposes.
Revenue Recognition
Substantially all of the Company's revenues are derived from the license of the Company's software products and the related professional services and customer support (maintenance) services. The Company's standard end user license agreement provides for an initial fee for use of the Company's products in perpetuity based on the number of named users. The Company licenses its software in multiple element arrangements in which the customer purchases a combination of software, maintenance and/or professional services (i.e., training, implementation services, etc.).
The Company recognizes revenue using the residual method pursuant to the requirements of Statement of Position No. 97-2 "Software Revenue Recognition" ("SOP 97-2"), as amended by Statement of Position No. 98-9, "Software Revenue Recognition with Respect to Certain Arrangements." Under the residual method, revenue is recognized in a multiple element arrangement when Company-specific objective evidence of fair value exists for all of the undelivered elements in the arrangement, but does not exist for one of the delivered elements in the arrangement. The Company allocates revenue to each element in a multiple element arrangement based on its respective fair value, with the fair value determined by the price charged when that element is sold separately. The Company defers revenue for the fair value of its undelivered elements (e.g., professional services and maintenance) and recognizes revenue for the remainder of the arrangement fee attributable to the delivered elements (i.e., software product) when the basic criteria in SOP 97-2 have been met.
Under SOP 97-2, revenue attributable to an element in a customer arrangement is recognized when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists and delivery has occurred, provided the fee is fixed or determinable, collectibility is probable and the arrangement does not require significant customization of the software. If at the outset of the customer arrangement, the Company determines that the arrangement fee is not fixed or determinable, the Company defers the revenue and recognizes the revenue when the arrangement fee becomes due and payable. If at the outset of the customer arrangement, the Company determines that collectibility is not probable, the Company defers the revenue and recognizes the revenue when payment is received. The Company recognizes revenue from resellers upon sell-through to the end customer.
Professional services, maintenance and other revenues relate primarily to consulting services, maintenance and training. Maintenance revenues are recognized ratably over the term of the maintenance contract, typically 12 months. Consulting and training revenues are recognized as the services are performed and are usually on a time and materials basis. Such services primarily consist of implementation services related to the installation of the Company's products and do not include significant customization to or development of the underlying software code.
The Company's customers include a number of its suppliers and on occasion, the Company has purchased goods or services for the Company's operations from these vendors at or about the same time the Company has licensed its software to these organizations. These transactions are separately negotiated, settled in cash, and recorded at terms the Company considers to be arm's length. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2001, the Company recognized approximately $12,222,000 and $50,400,000, respectively, of software license revenues from transactions with vendors where the Company purchased goods or services from those vendors at or about the same time as the software license transactions. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2002, the Company recognized approximately $30,700,000 and $50,600,000, respectively, of software license revenues from transactions with vendors where the Company purchased goods or services from those vendors at or about the same time as the software license transactions. The Company generally defines "at or about the same time" as "within six months."
The Company has established a program whereby qualified startup companies can obtain Siebel software in exchange for shares of their equity securities. Qualified startup companies are generally companies that have received and are expected to continue to receive funding and guidance from top-tier venture capital firms, have passed a credit review consistent with other Siebel customers, and have a sound business model and experienced management team. The Company recognized approximately $271,000 and $971,000 of software license revenues related to this program during the three and six months ended June 30, 2001, respectively. The Company did not recognize any revenue related to this program during the three and six months ended June 30, 2002. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2001, the Company recognized approximately $2,900,000 of software license revenues from a publicly traded company with which it negotiated a strategic investment. The software license was separately negotiated and recorded at terms the Company considers to be arm's length.
Cost of Revenues
Cost of software consists primarily of amortization of acquired technology, media, product packaging and shipping, documentation and other production costs, and third-party royalties. Cost of professional services, maintenance and other consists primarily of salaries, benefits and allocated overhead costs related to consulting, training and other global services personnel, including cost of services provided by third-party consultants engaged by the Company.
Software Development Costs
Software development costs associated with new products and enhancements to existing software products are expensed as incurred until technological feasibility in the form of a working model has been established. To date, the time period between the establishment of technological feasibility and completion of software development has been short, and no significant development costs have been incurred during that period. Accordingly, the Company has not capitalized any software development costs to date.
Advertising
Advertising costs are expensed as incurred. Advertising expense is included in sales and marketing expense and amounted to $5,806,000 and $14,869,000 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2001, respectively, and $4,174,000 and $9,659,000 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2002, respectively.
Income Taxes
The Company uses the asset and liability method of accounting for income taxes. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the estimated future tax consequences attributable to differences between the consolidated financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets are recognized for deductible temporary differences, along with net operating loss carryforwards and credit carryforwards, if it is more likely than not that the tax benefits will be realized. To the extent a deferred tax asset cannot be recognized under the preceding criteria, allowances must be established. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled.
Net Income per Share
Basic net income per share is computed using the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding. Diluted net income per share is computed using the weighted average number of shares of common stock and, when dilutive, potential common shares from options to purchase common stock, restricted common stock subject to repurchase by the Company, and warrants outstanding, using the treasury stock method. Dilutive net income per share also gives effect, when dilutive, to the conversion of the convertible subordinated debentures, using the if-converted method.
Reclassifications
Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation.
Intangible assets, net consisted of the following (in thousands):
December 31, June 30, 2001 2002 ---------- ---------- Acquired technology............................. $ 26,747 $ 26,747 Less: accumulated amortization.................. 7,747 12,192 ---------- ---------- Intangible assets, net..................... $ 19,000 $ 14,555 ========== ==========
Expected future amortization expense related to identifiable intangible assets (acquired technology) for the six-month period from July 1, 2002 to December 31, 2002, and each of the fiscal years thereafter is as follows (in thousands):
Period Ending December 31, ------------------------------- 2002............................................ $ 4,201 2003............................................ 7,837 2004............................................ 2,517 ---------- Total....................................... $ 14,555 ==========
The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill during the six months ended June 30, 2002, are as follows:
Balance as of December 31, 2001................. $ 72,869 Earnout payments to the stockholders of acquired companies........................... 5,978 Foreign currency fluctuation.................... (23) ---------- Balance as of June 30, 2002..................... $ 78,824 ==========
Summarized below are the effects on net income and net income per share data, if the Company had followed the amortization provisions of SFAS 142 for all periods presented (in thousands, except per share amounts):
Three Months Ended Six Months Ended June 30, June 30, -------------------- -------------------- 2001 2002 2001 2002 --------- --------- --------- --------- Net income: As reported..................................... $ 76,557 $ 29,775 $ 153,478 $ 94,396 Add: goodwill amortization, net of taxes........ 2,943 -- 6,449 -- --------- --------- --------- --------- Adjusted net income........................... $ 79,500 $ 29,775 $ 159,927 $ 94,396 ========= ========= ========= ========= Diluted net income per share: As reported..................................... $ 0.15 $ 0.06 $ 0.29 $ 0.18 Add: goodwill amortization, net of taxes........ -- -- 0.02 -- --------- --------- --------- --------- Adjusted diluted net income per share......... $ 0.15 $ 0.06 $ 0.31 $ 0.18 ========= ========= ========= ========= Basic net income per share: As reported..................................... $ 0.17 $ 0.06 $ 0.34 $ 0.20 Add: goodwill amortization, net of taxes........ -- -- 0.01 -- --------- --------- --------- --------- Adjusted basic net income per share.......... $ 0.17 $ 0.06 $ 0.35 $ 0.20 ========= ========= ========= =========
As of December 31, 2001 and June 30, 2002, the Company had $300,000,000 of convertible subordinated debentures outstanding. The seven-year-term convertible subordinated debentures mature September 15, 2006; bear interest at a rate of 5.50% per annum; and are convertible at the option of the holder into an aggregate of approximately 12,867,000 shares of the Company's common stock at any time prior to maturity, at a conversion price of approximately $23.32 per share, subject to adjustment under certain conditions. The Company may redeem the notes, in whole or in part, at any time on or after September 15, 2002. The redemption amount will range from $309,420,000 to $302,370,000, if the notes are redeemed between September 15, 2002, and September 14, 2006. Redemptions after September 14, 2006, will be at $300,000,000. The Company will pay accrued interest through the redemption date. The Company is not subject to any restrictive covenants related to the convertible subordinated debentures.
Letters of Credit
As of June 30, 2002, the Company had secured letters of credit with banks totaling approximately $10,306,000. These letters of credit, which expire between October 2002 and November 2015, collateralize the Company's lease obligations to various third parties.
Legal Actions
The Company is subject to legal proceedings and claims, either asserted or unasserted, which arise in the ordinary course of business. While the outcome of these proceedings and claims cannot be predicted with certainty, management does not believe that the outcome of any of these legal matters will have a material adverse effect on the Company's consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
Income and Payroll Taxes
The Company's U.S. Federal income tax returns and payroll tax returns for 1998, 1999 and 2000 are currently under examination by the Internal Revenue Service ("IRS"). To date, the IRS has not proposed any adjustments to or assessments related to these returns. Should the IRS propose adjustments to the Company's U.S. Federal income tax returns as a result of its examination, the Company believes that it has made adequate provision in the financial statements for such adjustments, if any. The Company has not made any provision for potential assessments by the IRS related to its payroll tax returns in the accompanying financial statements, as the amount, if any, that the Company may have to pay is not currently determinable.
Lease Obligations
During the six months ended June 30, 2002, the Company entered into an equipment financing arrangement related to certain of the Company's computer equipment, whereby the Company received proceeds of $24,873,000. The Company has recorded this arrangement as a capital lease. The lease requires monthly lease payments of $589,000, which includes both principal and interest, through December 31, 2005.
As of June 30, 2002, the Company leased facilities and certain equipment under noncancelable operating leases expiring between 2002 and 2022. The Company also leases certain assets, primarily computer equipment, under capital leases expiring between 2004 and 2005. Rent expense under operating leases for the three and six months ended June 30, 2001, was $29,842,000 and $56,559,000, respectively. Rent expense under operating leases for the three and six months ended June 30, 2002, was $31,128,000 and $62,185,000, respectively. Future minimum lease payments under both operating and capital leases are as follows (in thousands):
Capital Operating Leases Leases ---------- ---------- Six months ending December 31, 2002............. $ 3,902 $ 48,716 Year ending December 31, 2003.................... 8,983 122,695 Year ending December 31, 2004.................... 8,193 121,120 Year ending December 31, 2005.................... 7,068 117,152 Year ending December 31, 2006.................... -- 107,411 Year ending December 31, 2007.................... -- 101,733 Year ending December 31, 2008, and thereafter.... -- 619,132 ---------- ---------- Total minimum lease payments................ 28,146 $1,237,959 ========== Amounts representing interest............... (2,951) ---------- Present value of minimum lease payments..... 25,195 Less: capital lease obligations, short-term portion (included in accrued liabilities) 7,430 ---------- Capital lease obligations, long-term portion $ 17,765 ==========
Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation
On June 6, 2001, the Company's stockholders approved the amendment of the Company's Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation to increase the authorized number of shares of common stock from 800,000,000 shares to 2,000,000,000 shares.
Exchangeable Shares and Series A1 Preferred Stock
In connection with the acquisition of Janna Systems Inc. ("Janna") in November 2000, the Company issued certain Janna stockholders that were resident in Canada newly issued exchangeable shares (the "Exchangeable Shares") of a Canadian subsidiary of the Company that are currently exchangeable for the Company's common stock. Until November 30, 2005 (or earlier under certain circumstances), the Exchangeable Shares are exchangeable for the Company's common stock on a one-for-one basis at any time at the option of the holder. On November 30, 2005, any remaining outstanding Exchangeable Shares must convert on a one-for-one basis into the Company's common stock.
In connection with the acquisition of Janna, the Company issued one share of Series A1 Preferred Stock to Montreal Trust Company of Canada (the "Trustee"), as trustee on behalf of the holders of the Exchangeable Shares. The Series A1 Preferred Stock gives the holders of Exchangeable Shares the ability to vote on the same basis as the holders of the Company's common stock. The Trustee, as the holder of the Series A1 Preferred Stock, is entitled to a number of votes equal to the number of Exchangeable Shares outstanding.
Stock-Based Compensation
The Company's stock option plan and certain acquired companies' plans allow for the exercise of unvested options. Shares of common stock issued to employees upon exercise of unvested options are subject to repurchase by the Company at the original exercise price. The Company's ability to repurchase these shares expires at a rate equivalent to the current vesting schedule of each option. As of December 31, 2001 and June 30, 2002, a total of 271,000 and 150,500 outstanding shares of common stock, respectively, were subject to repurchase by the Company. No compensation expense has resulted from repurchases of restricted shares since the amount of cash paid by the Company did not differ from the proceeds received from the employee from the sale of the restricted shares. The Company has not issued any other restricted stock purchase awards, stock bonuses or stock appreciation rights.
The Company has elected to continue to use the intrinsic value method to account for all of its employee stock-based compensation plans. The Company records deferred compensation costs related to employee stock options when the exercise price of each option is less than the fair value of the underlying common stock as of the grant date for each stock option. There were no grants at exercise prices below the fair market value of the Company's common stock on the date of grant during the three and six months ended June 30, 2001 and 2002.
Net Income per Share
The following is a reconciliation of the number of shares used in the basic and diluted net income per share computations for the periods presented (in thousands):
Three Months Ended Six Months Ended June 30, June 30, -------------------- -------------------- 2001 2002 2001 2002 --------- --------- --------- --------- Shares used in basic net income per share computation........................... 455,352 474,211 451,682 472,353 Effect of dilutive potential common shares resulting from stock options and common stock warrants.................................. 67,137 50,587 69,840 64,635 Effect of dilutive potential common shares resulting from common stock subject to repurchase................................... 269 122 324 138 --------- --------- --------- --------- Shares used in diluted net income per share computation........................... 522,758 524,920 521,846 537,126 ========= ========= ========= =========
The Company excludes potentially dilutive securities from its diluted net income per share computation when their effect would be anti-dilutive. The following common stock equivalents were excluded from the earnings per share computation, as their inclusion would have been anti-dilutive (in thousands):
Three Months Ended Six Months Ended June 30, June 30, -------------------- -------------------- 2001 2002 2001 2002 --------- --------- --------- --------- Options excluded due to the exercise price exceeding the average fair value of the Company's common stock during the period......... 42,630 86,187 39,935 69,992 Weighted average shares issuable upon conversion of the subordinated debentures........ 12,867 12,867 12,867 12,867 --------- --------- --------- --------- Total common stock equivalents excluded from diluted net income per share computation...................................... 55,497 99,054 52,802 82,859 ========= ========= ========= =========
The options excluded from the earnings per share computation due to the exercise prices exceeding the average fair value of the Company's common stock during the three and six months ended June 30, 2001 and the three and six months ended June 30, 2002 had weighted average exercise prices of $67.06, $68.66, $47.51, and $52.94 per share, respectively.
The Company and its subsidiaries are principally engaged in the design, development, marketing and support of Siebel eBusiness Applications, its family of industry-specific eBusiness software applications. Substantially all revenues result from the license of the Company's software products and related professional services and customer support (maintenance) services. The Company's chief operating decision maker (i.e., chief executive officer) reviews financial information presented on a consolidated basis, accompanied by disaggregated information about revenues by geographic region for purposes of making operating decisions and assessing financial performance. Accordingly, the Company considers itself to be in a single industry segment, specifically the license, implementation and support of its software.
The Company did not complete any acquisitions during the six months ended June 30, 2002. During the year ended December 31, 2001, the Company completed the following transactions, each of which has been accounted for as a purchase:
nQuire Software, Inc.
On November 19, 2001, the Company acquired all of the outstanding securities of nQuire Software, Inc. ("nQuire"), a provider of Internet-based business analytics software. The Company acquired nQuire in order to capitalize on the expertise of the nQuire management team in the analytics market and their ability to develop new products using the Company's existing technology and technology acquired in the acquisition. As a result of this acquisition, the Company expects to become a leading provider of business intelligence and analytics application software.
The Company acquired nQuire for initial consideration of $59,722,000, consisting of 2,259,810 shares of the Company's common stock valued at $58,416,000 and options to existing employees of nQuire to purchase 56,108 shares of the Company's common stock valued at $1,306,000. The number of shares to be issued was not determined until November 19, 2001, and, accordingly, the common stock was valued based on the closing market price of the Company's common stock on that date. The Company valued the stock options issued to the employees of nQuire based on the Black-Scholes valuation model, using a risk-free interest rate of 5.0%, the expected remaining life of the option, and a volatility factor of 90.0%. The purchase price was allocated to tangible net assets, including net deferred tax assets of $5,318,000, other current assets of $1,258,000, property and equipment of $105,000, assumed current liabilities of $2,872,000 and deferred compensation related to unvested stock options and restricted common stock of $1,397,000. Based in part on an independent valuation study of nQuire, the Company determined that there was no purchased in-process research and development and that the only identifiable intangible asset not subsumed into goodwill (i.e., assembled workforce) was "acquired technology" valued at $7,500,000. The acquired technology is currently being amortized over its useful life of three years using the straight-line method. The excess of the purchase price over the fair value of the identifiable tangible and intangible net assets acquired of $47,016,000 was recorded as goodwill. This amount is not expected to be deductible for tax purposes.
As a result of nQuire meeting certain revenue and product delivery targets for the fourth quarter of 2001, as defined in the merger agreement, the Company issued in January 2002 an additional 163,500 shares valued at $5,688,000. The Company recorded $5,478,000 of this additional consideration as goodwill and $210,000 as compensation expense. In the event that nQuire meets certain post-closing revenue and product delivery targets for the years ended December 31, 2002 and 2003, as defined in the merger agreement, the Company could issue the shareholders of nQuire an aggregate of an additional 1,151,400 shares of the Company's common stock (the "nQuire Earnout"). The ultimate value of the nQuire Earnout depends upon the market value of the Company's common stock when paid. The Company will record approximately 96.0% of the nQuire Earnout, if paid, as goodwill and the remaining 4.0% of the nQuire Earnout, if paid, as compensation expense. The Company will record the compensation portion of the payments when the Company determines that it is probable that the Company will be obligated to pay such amounts, and the goodwill portion will be recorded when actually paid.
Sales.com, Inc.
In December 1999, the Company sold a controlling interest in the voting equity of Sales.com, Inc. ("Sales.com") to various outside investors. On January 12, 2001, the Company reacquired all of the outstanding securities of Sales.com for total consideration of $28,235,000, consisting of the issuance of 373,618 shares of the Company's common stock valued at $26,900,000 and the issuance of options to purchase 49,895 shares of the Company's common stock to existing employees of Sales.com valued at $1,335,000. The Company valued the stock options issued to the employees of Sales.com based on the Black-Scholes valuation model, using a risk-free interest rate of 5.0%, the expected remaining life of the option, and a volatility factor of 77.0%. The purchase price was allocated to tangible net assets, including cash of $11,550,000, other current assets of $1,178,000, property and equipment of $385,000, and assumed current liabilities of $888,000. The excess of the purchase price over the fair value of the tangible net assets acquired of $16,010,000 was allocated to acquired technology. This amount is currently being amortized over three years using the straight-line method.
Each of the above transactions was accounted for by the purchase method of accounting and, accordingly, the operating results of each of the acquired companies have been included in the accompanying consolidated financial statements of the Company from the date of acquisition. Pro forma information giving effect to these acquisitions has not been presented since the pro forma information would not differ materially from the historical results of the Company.
On July 17, 2002, the Company announced a restructuring of its operations and associated workforce reduction (collectively, the "Restructuring") intended to strengthen the Company's competitive position and future operating performance. The Company is in the process of finalizing its Restructuring Plan, under which the Company currently expects to recognize a charge to operations of up to approximately $275,000,000 in the second half of 2002. The Restructuring charge will be comprised primarily of: (i) severance and associated employee termination costs related to the reduction of the Company's workforce; (ii) lease termination costs and/or costs associated with permanently vacating the facilities; and (iii) impairment costs related to certain long-lived assets that will be abandoned, as discussed further below. Total cash outlays under the Restructuring are expected to be approximately $200,000,000 to $225,000,000, and relate primarily to costs associated with permanently vacating facilities and costs associated with the reduction of the Company's workforce. The Company expects that the costs associated with permanently vacating facilities will generally be paid over the remaining lease terms, ending at various dates through December 2023 or over a shorter period as the Company may negotiate with its lessors. The costs associated with the reduction of the Company's workforce will be paid during the second half of 2002. The total Restructuring charge and related cash outlay are based on management's current estimates, which may change as the Company finalizes its Restructuring Plan and/or adjusts its current estimates of the costs to exit certain facilities.
As part of the Restructuring, the Company intends to reduce its workforce by approximately 1,200 employees, or 16% of its workforce. This workforce reduction will affect substantially all of the Company's organizations and geographical regions. Expenses associated with the workforce reduction will be comprised primarily of severance and associated employment termination costs and will be expensed during the third quarter of 2002.
As a result of the workforce reduction and previous employee attrition, certain of the Company's currently occupied facilities and facilities scheduled to be occupied in early 2003 are projected to be under-utilized. Accordingly, in July 2002, the Company began developing a plan to improve the utilization of its facilities by consolidating its remaining workforce into certain existing facilities and permanently removing from its operations certain facilities currently occupied and certain facilities that the Company does not plan to occupy. The facilities to be permanently removed from the Company's operations are primarily in San Mateo, California; Egham, England; and several smaller offices in North America and Europe. The Company expects that the portion of the Restructuring charge related to facilities consolidation will be expensed during the second half of 2002. The Company's estimates of the excess facility charge are based on the expected lease termination costs, costs associated with satisfying remaining lease commitments, and expected brokerage and other re-letting costs, partially offset by estimated sublease income. Estimates related to the total facilities charge may vary significantly depending, in part, on factors which may be beyond the Company's control, such as the Company's success in negotiating with lessors, the time period required to locate and contract a suitable sublease and the market rates at the time of such subleases. Adjustments to the facilities reserve will be made if further consolidations are required or if actual lease commitments or sublease income differ from amounts currently expected.
As part of the consolidation of the Company's facilities, certain leasehold improvements are expected to be abandoned in the second half of 2002. In addition, in connection with the closure of certain facilities, the Company will abandon certain equipment at these facilities that will no longer be utilized in the Company's operations. The equipment to be abandoned is primarily composed of computer equipment, furniture and fixtures. The Company expects the portion of the Restructuring charge related to asset impairments will be expensed in the second half of 2002. The Company's estimates of the asset abandonment charge are based on the assets currently expected to be abandoned and the potential proceeds from disposal of such assets, among other factors.
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
The statements contained in this quarterly report that are not historical are forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Forward-looking statements include, without limitation, statements regarding the extent and timing of future revenues, restructuring and other expenses and customer demand, statements regarding the deployment of our products, and statements regarding reliance on third parties. All forward-looking statements included in this quarterly report are based on information available to us as of the date of this quarterly report. We assume no obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, unless we are required to do so by law. We have based these forward-looking statements on our current expectations and projections about future events. These forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and are subject to risks, uncertainties and assumptions, including those in the section entitled "Risk Factors" and elsewhere in this quarterly report.
Overview of the Company's Operations
Siebel is a leading provider of eBusiness applications software. Siebel eBusiness Applications are a family of leading Web applications software that enables an organization to better manage its most important relationships: its customer, partner and employee relationships. Siebel eBusiness Applications are designed to meet the information system requirements needed to manage these relationships for organizations of all sizes, from small businesses to the largest multinational organizations and government agencies. Our customer relationship management applications enable an organization to sell to, market to, and service its customers across multiple channels, including the Web, call centers, field, resellers, and retail and dealer networks. Our partner relationship management applications unite the organization's partners, resellers and customers in one global information system to facilitate greater collaboration and increased revenues, productivity and customer satisfaction. Our employee relationship management applications enable an organization to drive employee and organizational performance and increase employee satisfaction through the support of each stage of the employee life cycle. By deploying the comprehensive functionality of Siebel eBusiness Applications to better manage their customer, partner and employee relationships, some of our customers have achieved high levels of satisfaction from these constituencies and continue to be competitive in their markets.
Siebel recognizes that each industry has different business processes, competitive challenges and information systems requirements, which cannot be addressed with a "one size fits all" eBusiness approach. Accordingly, Siebel eBusiness Applications are available in 20 industry applications designed for specific segments within multiple industries, including financial services, communications, travel and transportation, energy, the consumer sector, life sciences, the industrial sector and the public sector. Providing best-of-class eBusiness functionality, Siebel eBusiness Applications enable organizations to create a single source of customer information that sales, service and marketing professionals can use to tailor product and service offerings to meet each of their customers' unique needs. By using Siebel eBusiness Applications, organizations can develop new customer relationships, profitably serve existing customers and integrate their systems with those of their partners, suppliers and customers, regardless of location.
The Company and its subsidiaries are principally engaged in the design, development, marketing and support of the above family of Siebel eBusiness Applications. Substantially all of the Company's revenues are derived from a perpetual license of these software products and the related professional services and customer support (maintenance) services. The Company licenses its software in multiple element arrangements in which the customer purchases a combination of software, maintenance and/or professional services (i.e., training, implementation services, etc.). First-year maintenance, which includes technical support and product updates, is typically sold with the related software license and is renewable at the option of the customer on an annual basis thereafter. The Company's Global Services Organization provides professional services, which include a broad range of implementation services, training and technical support, to the Company's customers and implementation partners. The Company's Global Services Organization has significant product and implementation expertise and is committed to supporting customers and partners through every phase of the eBusiness transformation cycle. Substantially all of the Company's professional service arrangements are billed on a time and materials basis. Payment terms for the above arrangements are negotiated with the Company's customers and determined based on a variety of factors, including the customer's credit standing and the Company's history with the customer.
Overview of the Results for the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2002
The Company's revenue growth and profitability depend in large part on the overall global economic and business conditions and the demand for information technology, particularly within the markets in which the Company offers industry-specific versions of its products. The majority of the Company's revenues are generated from customers in the high technology, telecommunications, financial services (including insurance), pharmaceutical, utilities and consumer packaged goods industries. Accordingly, the Company's business is affected by the economic and business conditions of these industries and the demand for information technology within these industries. Although recent economic data indicate that macroeconomic conditions may be stabilizing, capital spending by corporations, and more specifically technology spending, appears to be lagging behind the overall economic recovery. Hence, economic conditions within the information technology industry continued to be extremely difficult during the first six months of 2002 and, in fact, may have progressively deteriorated.
In response to these challenging economic conditions, at the beginning of 2002, the Company set five broad objectives, which guided management's decisions during the first six months of 2002: (i) operate a cash-positive, profitable business; (ii) maintain and improve customer satisfaction levels; (iii) maintain and improve the Company's market leadership; (iv) maintain the Company's product leadership in eBusiness; and (v) continue to develop solutions for the Company's customers that lower the total cost of integrating software applications. To better enable the Company to effectively achieve these five objectives, the Company commenced a reduction of its workforce in July 2002 and announced a planned consolidation of certain of its facilities, expected to be completed in the second half of 2002. Please refer to "Restructuring" below and Note 8 to the accompanying unaudited financial statements for further details. The Company believes that this restructuring of its operations will reduce its operating costs and, thereby, strengthen the Company's future operating performance. Actions undertaken by management during the three and six months ended June 30, 2002, included the following:
The Company maintained the cost controls that it initiated in 2001 and, accordingly, reduced the discretionary portion of its costs structure to near minimal levels, absent a reduction of the Company's workforce and/or elimination of a portion of the Company's facilities expenditures. Specifically, management continued to reduce advertising expenditures, maintained the chief executive officer salary at one dollar, maintained the 20% reductions in senior executive compensation, reduced or eliminated bonuses for other employees, deferred merit compensation increases, and reduced other discretionary expenditures, such as travel and recruiting.
The Company continued its requirement of obtaining competitive bids for its purchases, where appropriate. In addition, the Company continued to require chief executive officer approval for all significant purchases and all hiring.
To ensure that the Company maintains continuity of business operations under adverse circumstances, including a significant geopolitical dislocation in the San Francisco Bay Area, the Company continued to strengthen its data communications and customer service infrastructure. The Company expects that by the end of 2002, the Company will have strengthened its ability to provide high-quality customer service globally even in the event of a significant and sustained system outage at any of the Company's facilities.
The Company continued its focus on customer satisfaction by leading a team of systems integrators and software vendors in a collaborative effort to reduce the cost to the Company's customers of integrating software applications. Through this collaborative effort, the Company intends to release, later this year, "Universal Application Network," a standards-based, vendor-independent application integration solution. Universal Application Network is being designed to address one of the primary challenges facing the software applications industry: driving down the cost of application ownership and maintenance.
As a result of these actions and the actions undertaken in 2001, the Company was able to operate a cash-positive, profitable business in exceptionally challenging economic times; maintain or increase the Company's customer satisfaction levels; maintain or increase the Company's market share in the various product categories in which it operates; continue as a technology leader in the customer relationship management market; and continue its efforts to lower the total cost to the Company's customers of integrating software applications. In addition, the Company achieved the following financial results:
Total quarterly expenses decreased by 18%, from $449.2 million in the second quarter of 2001 to $368.3 million in the second quarter of 2002, and decreased by 20%, from $940.6 million for the first six months of 2001 to $755.8 million for the first six months of 2002.
Cash and short-term investments increased by $349.3 million, or 21%, from $1,656.7 million as of December 31, 2001, to $2,006.0 million as of June 30, 2002, representing approximately 61% and 67% of total assets, respectively. During 2001 and the first six months of 2002, a period of deteriorating global economic conditions, the Company increased cash and short-term investments by $853.4 million, or 74%, primarily through operations.
Cash flows from operations were $382.7 million and $278.8 million during the six months ended June 30, 2001 and 2002, respectively.
Deferred revenue, which consists primarily of deferred maintenance revenue, increased by 15%, from $241.0 million as of December 31, 2001, to $277.2 million as of June 30, 2002.
As a result of current economic uncertainties and concerns regarding the accounting practices of publicly traded companies, the Company believes that three specific factors will increasingly become important measures of a company's overall performance and value: (i) positive cash flows from operations; (ii) positive earnings that are reported in accordance with both the form and the intent of generally accepted accounting principles; and (iii) a strong balance sheet. Since shipment of its first product in the fourth quarter of 1994, the Company's operations have produced positive annual cash flows and earnings, both of which have increased in each of the last five years ending December 31, 2001. The Company believes that its financial position is strong, with total assets of $3,011.8 million, cash and short-term investments of $2,006.0 million, working capital of $1,824.8 million, and stockholders' equity of $2,036.9 million.
The Company believes that the application of accounting standards are as important as a company's reported financial position, results of operations and cash flows. The Company believes that its accounting policies are prudent and provide a clear view of the Company's financial performance. The Company utilizes its internal audit department to help ensure that it follows these accounting policies and maintain its internal controls. Prior to the release of the Company's financial results, the Company reviews its annual and quarterly results, along with key accounting policies and assumptions, with its audit committee, which is composed of independent board members. To ensure that the Company provides a clear view of its financial performance, the Company has avoided some of the accounting practices currently in question, such as disclosing operating results on a "pro forma" basis that excludes amortization of intangibles and/or stock-based compensation. In addition, the Company has not entered into any significant transactions with related parties. The Company does not use off-balance-sheet arrangements with unconsolidated related parties, nor does it use other forms of off-balance-sheet arrangements such as research and development arrangements.
Restructuring
As discussed above, during the first six months of 2002, the Company reduced the discretionary portion of its operating costs to near minimal levels, absent a reduction of its workforce and/or its facilities expenditures. As a result of the continued downturn in the information technology industry, certain of the Company's key operating metrics, such as total revenue, operating margin and revenue per employee, continued to decline from the Company's historical levels. In response to this decline, on July 17, 2002, the Company announced a restructuring of its operations and an associated workforce reduction (collectively, the "Restructuring") intended to: (i) strengthen the Company's competitive position, and (ii) reduce its cost structure and thereby improving the Company's revenue per employee, operating margin and overall operating performance.
The Company is in the process of finalizing this Restructuring Plan, under which the Company currently expects to recognize a charge to operations of up to approximately $275.0 million in the second half of 2002. The Restructuring charge will be comprised primarily of: (i) severance and associated employee termination costs related to the reduction of the Company's workforce; (ii) lease termination costs and/or costs associated with permanently vacating facilities; and (iii) impairment costs related to certain long-lived assets that will be abandoned, as discussed further below. Total cash outlays under the Restructuring are expected to be approximately $200.0 million to $225.0 million, and relate primarily to costs associated with permanently vacating facilities and costs associated with the reduction of the Company's workforce. The Company expects that the costs associated with permanently vacating facilities will generally be paid over the remaining lease terms, ending at various dates through December 2023 or over a shorter period as the Company may negotiate with its lessors. The costs associated with the reduction of the Company's workforce will be paid during the second half of 2002. The total Restructuring charge and related cash outlay are based on management's current estimates, which may change as the Company finalizes its Restructuring Plan and/or adjusts its current estimates of the costs to exit certain facilities.
As part of the Restructuring, the Company intends to reduce its workforce by approximately 1,200 employees, or 16% of its workforce. This workforce reduction will affect substantially all of the Company's organizations and geographical regions. Expenses associated with the workforce reduction will be comprised primarily of severance and associated employment termination costs and will be expensed during the third quarter of 2002.
As a result of the workforce reduction and previous employee attrition, certain of the Company's currently occupied facilities and facilities scheduled for occupation in early 2003 are projected to be under-utilized. Accordingly, in July 2002, the Company began developing a plan to improve the utilization of its facilities by consolidating its remaining workforce into certain existing facilities and permanently removing from its operations certain facilities currently occupied and certain facilities that the Company does not plan to occupy. The facilities to be permanently removed from the Company's operations are primarily in San Mateo, California; Egham, England; and several smaller offices in North America and Europe. The Company expects that the portion of the Restructuring charge related to facilities consolidation will be expensed during the second half of 2002. The Company's estimates of the excess facility charge are based on the expected lease termination costs, costs associated with satisfying remaining lease commitments, and expected brokerage and other re-letting costs, partially offset by estimated sublease income. Estimates related to the total facilities charge may vary significantly depending, in part, on factors which may be beyond the Company's control, such as the Company's success in negotiating with lessors, the time period required to locate and contract a suitable sublease and the market rates at the time of such subleases. Adjustments to the facilities reserve will be made if further consolidations are required or if actual lease commitments or sublease income differ from amounts currently expected.
As part of the consolidation of the Company's facilities, certain leasehold improvements are expected to be abandoned in the second half of 2002. In addition, in connection with the closure of certain facilities, the Company will abandon certain equipment at these facilities that will no longer be utilized in the Company's operations. The equipment to be abandoned is primarily composed of computer equipment, furniture and fixtures. The Company expects the portion of the Restructuring charge related to asset impairments will be expensed in the second half of 2002. The Company's estimates of the asset abandonment charge are based on the assets currently expected to be abandoned and the potential proceeds from disposal of such assets, among other factors.
Subject to the timely and successful implementation of the Restructuring, the Company believes that the Restructuring will further reduce the Company's expense levels and related cash requirements, resulting in a cost structure that is better aligned with the Company's anticipated future revenues. Because the Restructuring charge and related benefits are derived from management's estimates, which are based on currently available information, the Company's Restructuring may not achieve the benefits currently anticipated or on the timetable or at the level, currently contemplated. In addition, the Company's software license revenues and operating performance may continue to be negatively impacted by: (i) the uncertainty in the information technology industry; (ii) geopolitical uncertainties; (iii) additional terrorist attacks; (iv) a lack of confidence in corporate governance and accounting practices; (v) the diversity in global economic conditions; (vi) continued intense competition; and (vii) other factors described under "Risk Factors" below. Accordingly, additional actions, including a further restructuring of the Company's operations, may be required in the future. As a result, the demand for the Company's products and services and, ultimately, the Company's future financial performance, are difficult to predict with any degree of certainty.
Please refer to "We may not be able to successfully implement our restructuring efforts, and such efforts may adversely impact our ability to retain and attract future employees" under Risk Factors for further discussion of risks associated with the Restructuring.
Use of Estimates
The accompanying discussion and analysis of the Company's financial condition and results of operations are based upon the Company's unaudited consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. The preparation of these financial statements requires that the Company make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. On an ongoing basis, the Company evaluates its estimates, including those related to revenue recognition, provision for doubtful accounts and returns, fair value of investments, fair value of acquired intangible assets and goodwill, useful lives of intangible assets and property and equipment, income taxes, and contingencies and litigation, among others. The Company bases its estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results could differ significantly from the estimates made by management with respect to these and other items that require management's estimates.
In addition to these estimates and assumptions that are utilized in preparation of historical financial statements, the inability to properly estimate the timing and amount of future revenues could significantly impact the Company's future operations. While the Company's proprietary software allows the Company to track its potential revenues with a high degree of visibility and aids in its ability to manage the size of its operations, management must make assumptions and estimates as to the timing and amount of future revenue. Specifically, the Company's sales personnel monitor the status of all proposals, such as the estimated closing date and potential dollar amount of such transaction. The Company aggregates these estimates periodically to generate a sales pipeline and then evaluates the pipeline to identify trends in the Company's business. This pipeline analysis and related estimates of revenue may differ significantly from actual revenues in a particular reporting period as the estimates and assumptions were made using the best available data at the time, which is subject to change. Specifically, the slowdown in the global economy and information technology spending has caused and may continue to cause customer purchasing decisions to be delayed, reduced in amount or canceled, all of which have reduced and could continue to reduce the rate of conversion of the pipeline into contracts. A variation in the pipeline or in the conversion rate of the pipeline into contracts could cause the Company to plan or budget inaccurately and thereby could adversely affect the Company's business, financial condition or results of operations. In addition, because a substantial portion of the Company's software license contracts close in the latter part of a quarter, management may not be able to adjust the Company's cost structure to respond to a variation in the conversion of the pipeline in a timely manner, and thereby the delays may adversely and materially affect the Company's business, financial condition or results of operations.
Critical Accounting Policies
The Company believes that there are several accounting policies that are critical to understanding the Company's historical and future performance, as these policies affect the reported amounts of revenue and the more significant areas involving management's judgments and estimates. These significant accounting policies relate to revenue recognition, the provision for doubtful accounts, other-than-temporary declines in the market value of investments, acquired intangible assets, impairments of long-lived assets and the provision for income taxes. These policies, and the Company's procedures related to these policies, are described in detail below. Please see Note 1 to the accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements for a detailed description of these accounting policies.
Revenue Recognition
The Company's software arrangements typically include: (i) an end user license that provides for an initial fee in exchange for a customer's use of the Company's products in perpetuity based on a specified number of users; (ii) a maintenance arrangement that provides for technical support and product updates over a period of 12 months; and (iii) a professional service arrangement on a time and materials basis.
The Company recognizes software revenue using the residual method pursuant to the requirements of Statement of Position No. 97-2 "Software Revenue Recognition" ("SOP 97-2"), as amended by Statement of Position No. 98-9, "Software Revenue Recognition with Respect to Certain Arrangements." Under the residual method, revenue is recognized when Company-specific objective evidence of fair value exists for all of the undelivered elements in the arrangement (i.e., professional services and maintenance), but does not exist for one or more of the delivered elements in the arrangement (i.e., the software product). The Company allocates revenue to each undelivered element based on its respective fair value, with the fair value determined by the price charged when that element is sold separately. The Company determines the fair value of the maintenance portion of the arrangement based on the ultimate renewal price of the maintenance charged to the customer based on full deployment of the licensed software products and the fair value of the professional services portion of the arrangement based on the hourly rates that the Company charges for these services when sold independently from a software license. If evidence of fair value cannot be established for the undelivered elements of a license agreement, the entire amount of revenue from the arrangement is deferred and recognized over the period that these elements are delivered.
A customer typically prepays maintenance for the first 12 months, and the related revenue is deferred and recognized over the term of the initial maintenance contract. Maintenance is renewable by the customer on an annual basis thereafter. Rates for maintenance, including subsequent renewal rates, are typically established based upon a specified percentage of net license fees as set forth in the arrangement. Professional services revenue primarily consists of implementation services related to the installation of the Company's products and training revenues. The Company's software is ready to use by the customer upon receipt. While many of the Company's customers may choose to alter the software to fit their individual needs, the Company's implementation services do not involve significant customization to or development of the underlying software code. Substantially all of the Company's professional service arrangements are on a time and materials basis and, accordingly, are recognized as the services are performed, which is typically over a three- to six-month period subsequent to licensing of the Company's software.
For substantially all of the Company's software arrangements, the Company defers revenue for the fair value of the maintenance and professional services to be provided to the customer and recognizes revenue for the software license when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists and delivery has occurred, provided the fee is fixed or determinable and collection is deemed probable. The Company evaluates each of these criteria as follows:
Evidence of an arrangement: The Company considers a non-cancelable agreement signed by the Company and the customer to be evidence of an arrangement.
Delivery: Delivery is considered to occur when media containing the licensed programs is provided to a common carrier or, in the case of electronic delivery, the customer is given access to the licensed programs. The Company's typical end user license agreement does not include customer acceptance provisions.
Fixed or determinable fee: The Company considers the fee to be fixed or determinable if the fee is not subject to refund or adjustment. If the arrangement fee is not fixed or determinable, the Company recognizes the revenue as amounts become due and payable.
Collection is deemed probable: The Company conducts a credit review for all significant transactions at the time of the arrangement to determine the credit-worthiness of the customer. Collection is deemed probable if the Company expects that the customer will be able to pay amounts under the arrangement as payments become due. If the Company determines that collection is not probable, the Company defers the revenue and recognizes the revenue upon cash collection.
Provision for Doubtful Accounts
The Company initially records its provision for doubtful accounts based on its historical experience of write-offs and then adjusts this provision at the end of each reporting period based on a detailed assessment of its accounts receivable and allowance for doubtful accounts. In estimating the provision for doubtful accounts, management considers: (i) the age of the accounts receivable; (ii) trends within and ratios involving the age of the accounts receivable, (iii) the customer mix in each of the aging categories; (iv) the Company's historical provision for doubtful accounts, which has ranged between 1.0% and 3.5% of total revenues; (v) the credit-worthiness of the customer; (vi) the economic conditions of the customer's industry; and (vii) general economic conditions, among other factors. Should any of these factors change, the estimates made by management will also change, which could impact the level of the Company's future provision for doubtful accounts. Specifically, if the financial condition of the Company's customers were to deteriorate, affecting their ability to make payments, additional provision for doubtful accounts may be required. A number of the Company's customers are in the telecom industry and, as discussed previously, as part of the Company's evaluation of its provision for doubtful accounts, the Company has considered not only the economic conditions in that industry but also the financial condition of the Company's customers in that industry in determining the provision for doubtful accounts. Should conditions continue to deteriorate in this industry, or any other industry, additional provision for doubtful accounts may be required.
Other-than-Temporary Declines in the Market Value of Investments
The Company records an investment impairment charge when it determines an investment has experienced a decline in value that is other-than-temporary. To make this determination, the Company reviews the carrying value of its short-term investments and marketable equity securities, along with investments accounted for under the cost method, at the end of each reporting period to determine if any investments are impaired. This review includes an evaluation of historical and projected financial performance, expected cash needs and recent funding events. Other-than-temporary impairments are recognized in earnings if the market value of the investment is below its current carrying value for an extended period, which the Company generally defines as six to nine months, or the issuer has experienced significant financial declines or difficulties in raising capital to continue operations. Future adverse changes in market conditions or poor operating results of underlying investments could result in an inability to recover the carrying value of the investments, thereby possibly requiring an impairment charge in the future.
Acquired Intangible Assets
The Company accounts for its purchases of acquired companies in accordance with SFAS No. 141 "Business Combinations" ("SFAS 141") and accounts for the related acquired intangible assets in accordance with SFAS No. 142 "Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets" ("SFAS 142"). In accordance with SFAS 141, the Company allocates the cost of the acquired companies to the identifiable tangible and intangible assets and liabilities acquired, with the remaining amount being classified as goodwill. Certain intangible assets, such as "acquired technology," are amortized to expense over time, while in-process research and development costs ("IPR&D"), if any, are recorded as a one-time charge at the acquisition date.
Most of the entities acquired by the Company do not have significant tangible assets and, as a result, the majority of the purchase price is typically allocated to identified intangible assets and goodwill. The Company's future operating performance will be impacted by the future amortization of intangible assets, potential charges related to IPR&D, and potential impairment charges related to goodwill. Accordingly, the allocation of the purchase price to intangible assets and goodwill has a significant impact on the Company's future operating results. The allocation of the purchase price of the acquired companies to intangible assets and goodwill requires management to make significant estimates and assumptions, including estimates of future cash flows expected to be generated by the acquired assets and the appropriate discount rate to value these cash flows. Should different conditions prevail, material write-downs of net intangible assets and/or goodwill could occur.
As required by SFAS 142, the Company has not amortized goodwill associated with acquisitions completed after June 30, 2001, for any period presented and ceased amortization of goodwill associated with acquisitions completed prior to July 1, 2001, effective January 1, 2002. Prior to January 1, 2002, the Company amortized goodwill associated with the pre-July 1, 2001 acquisitions over three to five years using the straight-line method. Identifiable intangibles (acquired technology) are currently amortized over three years using the straight-line method. As described below, in lieu of amortizing goodwill, the Company tests goodwill for impairment periodically and records any necessary impairment in accordance with SFAS 142.
Impairments of Long-Lived Assets
The Company tests goodwill for impairment in accordance with SFAS 142, which requires that goodwill be tested for impairment at the "reporting unit level" ("Reporting Unit") at least annually and more frequently upon the occurrence of certain events, as defined by SFAS 142. Consistent with the Company's determination that it has only one reporting segment, the Company has determined that it has only one Reporting Unit, specifically the license, implementation and support of its software applications. Goodwill will be tested for impairment annually on July 1 in a two-step process. First, the Company must determine if the carrying amount of its Reporting Unit exceeds the "fair value" of the Reporting Unit based on quoted market prices of the Company's common stock, which would indicate that goodwill may be impaired. If the Company determines that goodwill may be impaired, the Company compares the "implied fair value" of the goodwill, as defined by SFAS 142, to its carrying amount to determine the impairment loss, if any.
The Company evaluates all of its long-lived assets, including intangible assets other than goodwill, for impairment in accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 144 "Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets" ("SFAS 144"). SFAS 144 requires that long-lived assets and intangible assets other than goodwill be evaluated for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of an asset may not be recoverable based on expected undiscounted cash flows attributable to that asset. Should events indicate that any of the Company's assets are impaired, the amount of such impairment will be measured as the difference between the carrying value and the fair value of the impaired asset and recorded in earnings during the period of such impairment.
Provision for Income Taxes
The Company's valuation allowance on its deferred tax assets pertains to certain tax credits and net operating loss carryforwards resulting from the exercise of certain employee stock options. The valuation allowance will be reduced in the period in which the Company realizes a benefit on its tax return from a reduction of income taxes payable from the utilization of these credits and losses. When realized, the tax benefit of these credits and losses will be accounted for as a credit to shareholders' equity rather than as a reduction of income tax expense.
As part of the process of preparing the Company's financial statements, the Company is required to estimate its income taxes in each of the jurisdictions in which the Company operates. This process involves estimating the Company's current tax liabilities in each jurisdiction, including the impact, if any, of additional taxes resulting from tax examinations as well as making judgments regarding the recoverability of deferred tax assets. To the extent recovery of deferred tax assets is not likely based on the Company's estimation of future taxable income in each jurisdiction, a valuation allowance is established. Tax liabilities can involve complex issues and may require an extended period to resolve. While the Company has considered future taxable income and the existence of prudent and feasible tax planning strategies in assessing the need for an additional valuation allowance on its remaining deferred tax assets, in the event the Company were to determine that it would not be able to realize all or part of its net deferred tax assets in the future, an adjustment to the deferred tax assets would be charged to income in the period such determination was made.
To determine the Company's quarterly tax rate, the Company is required to estimate its full-year income and the related income tax expense in each jurisdiction in which the Company operates. Changes in the geographical mix or estimated level of annual pre-tax income can impact the Company's overall effective tax rate. Accordingly, the Company may have to increase its tax rate in future periods should the actual geographical mix or annual pre-tax income differ from amounts currently expected.
Results of Operations for the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2001 and 2002
The following table sets forth the consolidated statement of operations data for the three and six months ended June 30, 2001 and 2002, expressed as a percentage of total revenues:
Three Months Ended Six Months Ended June 30, June 30, ---------------------- --------------------- 2001 2002 2001 2002 --------- --------- --------- --------- Revenues: Software...................................... 51.2 % 41.9 % 53.7 % 47.1 % Professional services, maintenance and other.. 48.8 58.1 46.3 52.9 --------- --------- --------- --------- Total revenues............................ 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 --------- --------- --------- --------- Cost of revenues: Software...................................... 0.8 1.3 0.7 1.2 Professional services, maintenance and other.. 28.5 29.4 28.7 27.8 --------- --------- --------- --------- Total cost of revenues.................... 29.3 30.7 29.4 29.0 --------- --------- --------- --------- Gross margin............................ 70.7 69.3 70.6 71.0 --------- --------- --------- --------- Operating expenses: Product development........................... 8.8 12.4 8.5 11.2 Sales and marketing........................... 34.5 37.1 35.0 35.8 General and administrative.................... 7.6 10.6 8.3 9.6 --------- --------- --------- --------- Total operating expenses.................. 50.9 60.1 51.8 56.6 --------- --------- --------- --------- Operating income........................ 19.8 9.2 18.8 14.4 Other income, net............................... 1.9 2.3 2.2 2.3 --------- --------- --------- --------- Income before income taxes.............. 21.7 11.5 21.0 16.7 Income taxes.................................... 8.0 4.1 7.8 6.0 --------- --------- --------- --------- Net income.............................. 13.7 % 7.4 % 13.2 % 10.7 % ========= ========= ========= =========
Revenues
Software. Software license revenues decreased by 41% from $286.8 million for the three months ended June 30, 2001, to $170.1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2002, and decreased by 33% from $621.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2001, to $416.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2002. As previously discussed, the Company's customers and ultimately the Company's software license revenues have been impacted by: (i) the continued deterioration in the information technology industry; (ii) the weakness of the global economy; (iii) fear of additional terrorist attacks; (iv) a lack of confidence in corporate governance and accounting practices; (v) continued intense competition; and (vi) geopolitical uncertainties. These factors have caused many of the Company's customers to: (i) delay the initiation of the purchasing process; (ii) increase the time to complete a software purchase; and/or (iii) reduce their capital expenditure budgets and ultimately the size of their purchases of the Company's software. As a result, the Company's software license revenues have decreased during the three and six months ended June 30, 2002, compared to the respective periods in 2001. Please refer to the risk factor "A variation in the conversion of our revenue pipeline to contracts could adversely affect our revenues and ability to forecast operations."
Software license revenues as a percentage of total revenues decreased from 51% in the three months ended June 30, 2001, to 42% in the three months ended June 30, 2002, and decreased from 54% in the six months ended June 30, 2001, to 47% in the six months ended June 30, 2002. The decline in software license revenues as a percentage of total revenues was primarily due to the factors described above impacting software license revenues to a greater extent than professional services, maintenance and other revenues. The Company anticipates that the Company's software license revenues will return to positive sequential quarterly growth as the overall economic conditions strengthen and, more specifically, the overall demand for information technology increases. The Company does not expect an improvement in information technology spending in the immediate future and, accordingly, the Company currently expects quarterly software license revenues in the second half of 2002, both in terms of absolute dollars and as a percentage of total revenues, to remain comparable to or decrease from the levels achieved in the second quarter of 2002.
The Company markets its products in the United States through its direct sales force and internationally through its direct sales force and to a limited extent through distributors, primarily in Europe, Asia Pacific, Japan and Latin America. International license revenues accounted for 56% and 46% of software license revenues for the three and six months ended June 30, 2001, respectively, compared to 34% and 37% of software license revenues for the three and six months ended June 30, 2002, respectively. International software license revenues declined in 2002 from the levels in 2001 primarily due to the economic conditions in Europe and Asia lagging behind the deterioration of economic conditions in the United States by approximately six months. The Company expects international software license revenues will continue to account for a significant portion of total software license revenues in the future.
Professional Services, Maintenance and Other. Professional services, maintenance and other revenues are primarily composed of professional services (i.e., implementation services and training) and maintenance (i.e., technical support and product updates). Professional services are typically provided over a period of three to six months subsequent to a software license arrangement and, accordingly, the Company's professional services revenues depend in large part on the Company's software license revenues. The Company's maintenance revenues depend on both the Company's software license revenues and renewals of maintenance agreements by the Company's existing customer base. Professional services, maintenance and other revenues decreased by 14% from $273.3 million for the three months ended June 30, 2001, to $235.5 million for the three months ended June 30, 2002, and decreased by 13% from $537.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2001, to $467.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2002. As a percentage of total revenues, professional services, maintenance and other revenues were 49% and 46% during the three and six months ended June 30, 2001, respectively, compared to 58% and 53% during the three and six months ended June 30, 2002, respectively.
The decrease in the absolute dollar amount of professional services, maintenance and other revenues was due to a decline in professional services revenues, partially offset by an increase in maintenance revenues. Professional services revenues decreased on a year-over-year basis as a result of the deterioration of global economic conditions and resulting decrease in the Company's software license revenues. The Company's maintenance revenues have continued to increase both sequentially and on a year-over-year basis, primarily due to the continued renewal of customer maintenance agreements. While maintenance revenues continued to increase sequentially in the second quarter, the Company's efforts to renew existing customers' maintenance agreements have become increasingly more challenging than in previous quarters. Professional services, maintenance and other revenues increased as a percentage of total revenues due primarily to the growth in the number of customers receiving maintenance, coupled with the decrease in the Company's software license revenues. The Company currently anticipates that professional services, maintenance and other revenues will remain the same or decrease in the third and fourth quarters of 2002 as compared to the levels achieved in the second quarter of 2002. The Company expects to continue to manage its professional services organization to ensure that it does not compete with its implementation partners.
On January 1, 2002, the Company adopted EITF No. 01-14 "Income Statement Characterization of Reimbursements Received for 'Out-of-Pocket' Expenses Incurred" ("EITF 01-14"). EITF 01-14 requires that certain out-of-pocket expenses rebilled to customers be recorded as revenue versus an offset to the related expense. Prior to the adoption of EITF 01-14, the Company recorded rebilled out-of-pocket expenses as an offset to the related expense. Comparative financial statements for prior periods have been conformed to the current year presentation.
Cost of Revenues
Software. Cost of software license revenues includes amortization of acquired technology; third-party software royalties; and product packaging, production and documentation. All costs incurred in the research and development of software products and enhancements to existing products have been expensed as incurred. Cost of software license revenues was $4.5 million and $8.8 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2001, respectively, compared to $5.3 million and $10.6 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2002, respectively. As a percentage of software license revenues, cost of software license revenues was 2% and 1% in the three and six months ended June 30, 2001, respectively, compared to 3% for both the three and six months ended June 30, 2002. Cost of software license revenues increased in absolute dollars and as a percentage of software license revenue primarily due to increases in amortization expense associated with the acquired technology obtained in the acquisition of nQuire Software, Inc., as discussed in Note 7 to the accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements. These costs as a percentage of software license revenues are expected to remain comparable in the second half of 2002 to the percentage of software license revenues incurred during the second quarter of 2002.
Professional Services, Maintenance and Other. Cost of professional services, maintenance and other revenues consist primarily of personnel, facilities and systems costs incurred to provide training, consulting and other global services. Cost of professional services, maintenance and other revenues decreased from $159.5 million and $332.2 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2001, respectively, to $119.3 million and $245.3 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2002, respectively. As a percentage of professional services, maintenance and other revenues, these costs were 58% and 62% in the three and six months ended June 30, 2001, respectively, as compared to 51% and 53% in the three and six months ended June 30, 2002, respectively. The decrease in the absolute dollar amount reflects (i) the reduction of headcount in response to the global economic downturn and the subsequent decrease in demand for the Company's implementation services; (ii) a reduction in the use of third-party contractors; and (iii) an acceleration of the Company's cost control initiatives, including reductions of discretionary expenditures such as travel and entertainment and incentive and other variable compensation. The decrease as a percentage of professional services, maintenance and other revenues from the 2001 periods to the 2002 periods reflects: (i) the continued growth of the Company's higher-margin maintenance revenues; (ii) a higher utilization of the Company's global services personnel; (iii) a reduction in the use of third-party contractors; and (iv) an acceleration of the Company's cost control initiatives discussed above.
As a result of the Company's Restructuring discussed above, the Company expects that professional services, maintenance and other costs in terms of absolute dollars will decrease from the levels obtained in the second quarter of 2002. The Company expects that professional services, maintenance and other costs as a percentage of professional services, maintenance and other revenues will remain comparable in the second half of 2002 to the levels incurred during the second quarter of 2002.
As discussed above, prior to adoption of EITF 01-14, the Company recorded rebilled out-of-pocket expenses as an offset to the related expense. Comparative financial statements for prior periods have been conformed to the current year presentation.
Operating Expenses
Product Development. Product development expense includes costs associated with the development of new products, enhancements of existing products and quality assurance activities and consists primarily of employee salaries, benefits, consulting costs and the cost of software development tools and equipment. The Company considers technological feasibility of its software products to have been reached upon completion of a working model that has met certain performance criteria. The period between achievement of technological feasibility and general release of a software product is typically very short, and development costs incurred during that period have not been material. Accordingly, the Company has not capitalized any software development costs to date. Product development expense increased from $49.5 million and $97.6 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2001, respectively, to $50.3 million and $99.4 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2002, respectively. As a percentage of total revenues, product development expense was 9% and 8% for the three and six months ended June 30, 2001, respectively, as compared to 12% and 11% for the three and six months ended June 30, 2002, respectively.
The increase in product development expense was primarily attributable to costs of additional personnel and depreciation of equipment utilized in the Company's product development operations. The Company added these personnel and related costs to support the development and testing of Siebel 7 and subsequent releases. Product development expense as a percentage of total revenues increased primarily as a result of the Company's increased investment in its research and development of new products during a period in which the Company's software license revenues decreased. In response to the weak economic conditions in the information technology industry and in connection with the Company's Restructuring discussed above, the Company reduced its product development staff in July 2002 and anticipates removing from its operations excess facility capacity in the second half of 2002. While the Company anticipates that it will continue to devote substantial resources to develop new products, new versions of its existing products and additional modules, the Company expects product development expense to decrease, both in terms of the absolute dollar amount and as a percentage of total revenues, in the third and fourth quarters of 2002 as compared to the levels obtained during the second quarter of 2002.
Sales and Marketing. The Company continues to place significant emphasis, both domestically and internationally, on direct sales through its own sales force. Accordingly, sales and marketing expense is composed primarily of costs associated with the Company's sales and marketing personnel, including the Company's product marketing personnel, and consists primarily of salaries, commissions and bonuses earned by these personnel, along with field office expenses and travel and entertainment related to these personnel. Sales and marketing expense also includes promotional and advertising expenses. Sales and marketing expense decreased from $193.4 million and $405.3 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2001, respectively, to $150.6 million and $316.0 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2002, respectively. As a percentage of total revenues, sales and marketing expense was 35% for the three and six months ended June 30, 2001, as compared to 37% and 36% for the three and six months ended June 30, 2002, respectively.
Sales and marketing expense decreased in terms of absolute dollars during the three and six months ended June 30, 2002, from the comparable periods in 2001, primarily due to the Company's cost control initiatives and the decrease in sales commissions that resulted from a decrease in the Company's software license revenues. In response to the weakening global economy, the Company reduced its expenditures throughout 2001 and has continued to closely monitor its expenses during the six months ended June 30, 2002. The Company's cost controls included: (i) decreasing or eliminating incentive compensation and reducing executive compensation; (ii) deferring merit compensation increases; (iii) reducing advertising, travel and other discretionary expenditures; and (iv) reducing headcount in the second half of 2001. In addition, as discussed above under Restructuring, the Company has reduced its sales and marketing staff in July 2002 and currently expects to consolidate excess facilities to further reduce sales and marketing expense. Accordingly, the Company expects that sales and marketing expense, in terms of absolute dollars and as a percentage of total revenues, will decrease in the third and fourth quarters of 2002 as compared to the levels obtained during the second quarter of 2002.
General and Administrative. General and administrative expense consists primarily of salaries and occupancy costs for administrative, executive and finance personnel, along with bad debt expense. General and administrative expense was $42.4 million and $96.6 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2001, respectively, as compared to $42.8 million and $84.5 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2002, respectively. As a percentage of total revenues, general and administrative expense was 8% for the three and six months ended June 30, 2001, as compared to 11% and 10% for the three and six months ended June 30, 2002, respectively. General and administrative expense in terms of absolute dollars increased from the three months ended June 30, 2001, to the three months ended June 30, 2002, due primarily to an increase in facility- (i.e., rent) and equipment- (i.e., depreciation) related expenses. The increase in rent and depreciation was partially offset by a decrease in the Company's provision for doubtful accounts, the elimination of goodwill amortization in 2002 as a result of the adoption of SFAS 142, and management's cost control initiatives described above. The decrease in absolute dollars from the six months ended June 30, 2001, to the six months ended June 30, 2002, was due primarily to: (i) management's cost control initiatives; (ii) a decrease in the Company's provision for doubtful accounts; and (iii) the elimination of goodwill amortization expense, partially offset by an increase in rent and depreciation expense.
As a result of management's cost control initiatives, during the three and six months ended June 30, 2002, the vast majority of general and administrative expenses were relatively fixed in nature, absent a reduction in workforce or facilities-related expenditures. Accordingly, due primarily to a decrease in total revenues, general and administrative expense increased as a percentage of total revenues during the three and six months ended June 30, 2002, as compared to respective periods in 2001. As discussed above, the Company announced the Restructuring in July 2002, which the Company expects will better align its costs structure with its current revenue levels. Therefore, the Company anticipates that general and administrative expense, in terms of absolute dollars and as a percentage of total revenues, will decrease in the third and fourth quarters of 2002 as compared to the levels obtained during the second quarter of 2002.
Operating Income and Operating Margin
Operating income was $110.9 million and $218.3 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2001, respectively, compared to $37.2 million and $127.6 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2002, respectively. Operating margins were 20% and 19% during the three and six months ended June 30, 2001, respectively, as compared to 9% and 14% during the three and six months ended June 30, 2002, respectively. Operating income decreased in the three and six months ended June 30, 2002, from the comparable periods in 2001 due primarily to: (i) the year-over-year decrease in software license revenues, and (ii) the Company's increased investment in product development. This decline in operating income was partially offset by: (i) management's cost control initiatives, and (ii) the elimination of the requirement to amortize goodwill, which totaled approximately $4.7 million and $10.2 million during the three and six months ended June 30, 2001, respectively. Please refer to Notes 1 and 2 to the accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements for further discussions regarding the elimination of the requirement to amortize goodwill. While both of these factors had positive effects on operating margins in 2002, they were offset by: (i) a higher percentage of total revenues coming from professional services, maintenance, and other revenues, which are at lower margins than software license revenues and (ii) the Company's increased investment in product development.
Other Income, Net
For the three and six months ended June 30, 2001 and 2002, other income, net was comprised of the following:
Three Months Ended Six Months Ended June 30, June 30, -------------------- -------------------- 2001 2002 2001 2002 --------- --------- --------- --------- Interest income................................ $ 17,136 $ 14,885 $ 36,244 $ 28,957 Interest expense............................... (4,362) (4,889) (9,096) (9,836) Net gains on investments....................... 598 2,478 1,774 4,730 Write-down of cost-method investments.......... (1,738) (2,508) (2,410) (2,508) Other, net..................................... (1,038) (659) (1,217) (1,443) --------- --------- --------- --------- $ 10,596 $ 9,307 $ 25,295 $ 19,900 ========= ========= ========= =========
Interest income represents earnings on the Company's cash and short-term investments. Interest income decreased during the three and six months ended June 30, 2002, from the levels for the comparable periods in 2001, primarily due to a decline in interest rates, partially offset by the Company's increased balances of cash and short-term investments. Interest expense for all periods presented primarily represents interest on the Company's $300.0 million convertible subordinated debentures (see Note 3 to the accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements).
During the three and six months ended June 30, 2001 and 2002, net gains on investments were primarily the result of gains from sales of the Company's short-term investments. For the 2002 periods, the gains on investments were partially offset by a $0.6 million write-down of one of the Company's marketable equity securities to fair value, as the decline was determined to be other-than-temporary. The Company holds several minority interests, included in other assets, in companies having operations or technology in areas within its strategic focus. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2001 and 2002, the Company wrote down certain of these investments accounted for under the cost method to fair value as the decline in these investments was deemed to be other-than-temporary. Other, net for all periods presented is primarily composed of banking fees and foreign currency gains or losses.
Provision for Income Taxes
Income taxes totaled $45.0 million and $90.1 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2001, respectively, and totaled $16.7 million and $53.1 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2002, respectively. Income taxes as a percentage of pretax income decreased from 37% in both the three and six months ended June 30, 2001, to 36% in both the three and six months ended June 30, 2002. The Company's effective tax rate for the 2001 period was higher than the rate in the 2002 period primarily due to the Company deriving a higher percentage of its taxable income from more favorable tax jurisdictions. The Company currently expects its effective tax rate for the remainder of 2002 to be approximately 36%; however, as discussed above under "Critical Accounting Policies" the Company may have to increase its tax rate in future periods should the Company's actual geographical mix of pre-tax income or annual pre-tax income differ from amounts currently expected.
Net Income
The Company had net income of $76.6 million and $153.5 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2001, respectively, as compared to $29.8 million and $94.4 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2002, respectively. Diluted net income per share was $0.15 and $0.29 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2001, respectively, compared to $0.06 and $0.18 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2002, respectively.
Adoption of Accounting Standards
During the six months ended June 30, 2001 and 2002, the Company adopted new accounting standards related to the accounting for its: derivative instruments and hedging activities; business combinations; intangible assets and goodwill; impairment of long-lived assets; discontinued operations; and presentation of rebilled out-of-pocket expenses. There was not a cumulative transition adjustment upon the adoption of any of these accounting standards, and the adoption of these accounting standards did not have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows. The following is a brief summary of the accounting standards adopted during the six months ended June 30, 2001 and 2002:
Derivatives Instruments and Hedging Activities. On January 1, 2001, the Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 133, "Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities" ("SFAS 133"). SFAS 133 establishes accounting and reporting standards for derivative instruments and hedging activities. SFAS 133 requires that all derivatives be recognized as either assets or liabilities at fair value. Derivatives or portions of derivatives that are not designated as hedging instruments are adjusted to fair value through earnings and are recognized in the period of change in their fair value. The Company does not believe that the application of SFAS 133 will significantly alter the Company's hedging strategies. However, its application may increase the volatility of other income and expense and other comprehensive income.
Business Combinations. On July 1, 2001, the Company adopted certain provisions of SFAS 141, as required for business combinations consummated after June 30, 2001. The Company adopted the remaining provisions of SFAS 141 effective January 1, 2002. SFAS 141 requires that all business combinations be accounted for using the purchase method, thereby prohibiting the pooling-of-interests method. SFAS 141 also specifies criteria for recognizing and reporting intangible assets apart from goodwill; however, assembled workforce must be recognized and reported in goodwill.
Goodwill and Intangible Assets. On July 1, 2001, the Company adopted certain provisions of SFAS 142, as required for goodwill and intangible assets acquired in purchase business combinations consummated after June 30, 2001. The Company adopted the remaining provisions of SFAS 142 effective January 1, 2002. SFAS 142 requires that intangible assets with an indefinite life should not be amortized until their life is determined to be finite, and all other intangible assets must be amortized over their useful life. SFAS 142 also requires that goodwill not be amortized but instead tested for impairment at the "Reporting Unit" level, as defined, at least annually and more frequently upon the occurrence of certain events. The Company has completed the first step of the transitional goodwill impairment test and has determined that there was no transitional impairment upon full adoption.
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and Discontinued Operations. On January 1, 2002, the Company adopted SFAS 144. SFAS 144 supersedes certain provisions of APB Opinion No. 30 "Reporting the Results of Operations - Reporting the Effects of Disposal of a Segment of a Business, and Extraordinary, Unusual and Infrequently Occurring Events and Transactions" and supersedes SFAS No. 121 "Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to Be Disposed Of."
Presentation of Rebilled Expenses. On January 1, 2002, the Company adopted EITF 01-14. EITF 01-14 requires that certain out-of-pocket expenses rebilled to customers be recorded as revenue versus an offset to the related expense. Prior to the adoption of EITF 01-14, the Company recorded rebilled out-of-pocket expenses as an offset to the related expense. Comparative financial statements for prior periods have been conformed to the current year presentation. This change had no effect on operating income or net income for any period presented.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
The Company derives its liquidity and capital resources primarily from the Company's cash flows from operations and from working capital. The Company's cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments increased from $1,656.7 million as of December 31, 2001, to $2,006.0 million as of June 30, 2002, representing approximately 61% and 67% of total assets, respectively. The Company's days sales outstanding in accounts receivable was 73 days as of December 31, 2001, compared with 80 days as of June 30, 2002. The Company's liquidity could be negatively impacted by a decrease in demand for the Company's products, which are subject to rapid technological changes, or a reduction of capital expenditures by the Company's customers as a result of a downturn in the global economy, among other factors. The Company does not have any off-balance-sheet arrangements with unconsolidated entities or related parties and, accordingly, the Company's liquidity and capital resources are not subject to off-balance-sheet risks from unconsolidated entities.
As of June 30, 2002, the Company's future fixed commitments for cash payments primarily related to obligations under non-cancelable operating and capital leases and the Company's convertible subordinated debentures. The Company leases facilities under non-cancelable operating leases expiring between 2002 and 2022 and certain equipment under non-cancelable operating and capital leases expiring between 2002 and 2014. Future minimum lease payments under these leases as of June 30, 2002, consisted of $52.6 million due for the remainder of 2002, $594.4 million due within five years subsequent to 2002, and $619.1 million due in 2008 and thereafter. In addition, as of June 30, 2002, the Company had $300.0 million of convertible subordinated debentures outstanding. These debentures mature on September 15, 2006; bear interest at a rate of 5.50%; and are convertible at the option of the holder into 12.9 million shares of the Company's common stock at any time prior to maturity, at a conversion price of $23.32 per share, subject to adjustment under certain conditions. The Company may redeem the notes, in whole or in part, at any time on or after September 15, 2002. The redemption price will range from $309.4 million to $302.4 million if the notes are redeemed between September 15, 2002, and September 14, 2006. Any redemption made on or after September 15, 2006, will be at $300.0 million. The Company will pay accrued interest to the redemption date.
Cash provided by operating activities was $382.7 million and $278.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2001 and 2002, respectively. Despite the weak economic conditions, the Company has continued to operate its business to produce positive cash flows from its operations. The Company's cash provided from operations in each of these periods was primarily derived from the Company's earnings prior to non-cash expenses such as depreciation, amortization and bad debt. Also contributing to cash flows from operations is: (i) the tax benefit related to the exercise of employee stock options, which reduces the Company's cash outlay for income tax expense, and (ii) changes in the Company's working capital, which is primarily composed of collections of accounts receivable and increases in deferred revenue. The Company's cash provided by operating activities decreased in 2002 from the comparable period in 2001 primarily as the result of the decreases in revenues and operating income that occurred, in part, as a result of the weak global economic conditions.
Cash used in investing activities was $415.2 million and $319.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2001 and 2002, respectively. During each of the these periods, the Company's investment activities primarily related to the purchase of additional property and equipment and the reinvestment of the Company's cash into short-term investments. For the six months ended June 30, 2001 and 2002, the Company reinvested its cash flows from operations into short-term investments in net amounts of $255.1 million and $280.7 million, respectively, and had purchases of property and equipment, including leasehold improvements, of $172.4 million and $49.2 million, respectively. Other investing activities totaled approximately $12.3 million and $10.7 million during the six months ended June 30, 2001 and 2002, respectively.
Capital expenditures were significantly higher in the first half of 2001 compared to the first half of 2002 primarily as a result of the following: (i) expansion of the Company's infrastructure during 2001 to support the development and testing of Siebel 7, and (ii) purchases of tenant improvements and furniture and fixtures for newly leased facilities. The Company may purchase land and buildings in the future to meet its facilities requirements.
Cash provided by financing activities was $119.3 million and $97.0 million during the six months ended June 30, 2001 and 2002, respectively. For the six months ended June 30, 2001 and 2002, the Company's financing activities consisted primarily of net proceeds of $118.5 million and $76.2 million, respectively, from the issuance of common stock pursuant to the exercise of stock options and the Company's employee stock purchase plan. During the six months ended June 30, 2002, the Company also received proceeds of $24.9 million from equipment financing, partially offset by net repayments on this financing and other capital leases of $4.5 million.
While the Company believes that the anticipated cash flows from operations, along with cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments, will be adequate to meet its cash needs for daily operations and capital expenditures for at least the next 12 months, the Company may elect to raise additional capital through a public offering or other means in the future, depending upon market conditions.
Risk Factors
Set forth below and elsewhere in this quarterly report and in the other documents we file with the SEC are risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from the results contemplated by the forward-looking statements contained in this quarterly report. Prospective and existing investors are strongly urged to carefully consider the various cautionary statements and risks set forth in this quarterly report and our other public filings.
Our total revenue and operating results may fluctuate.
We have experienced and in the future may experience a shortfall in revenue or earnings or otherwise fail to meet public market expectations, which could materially and adversely affect our business and the market price of our common stock. Our total revenue and operating results may fluctuate significantly because of a number of factors, many of which are outside of our control. These factors include:
One or more of the foregoing factors may cause our operating expenses to be disproportionately high during any given period or may cause our net revenue and operating results to fluctuate significantly. Based upon the preceding factors, we may experience a shortfall in revenue or earnings or otherwise fail to meet public market expectations, which could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and the market price of our common stock.
Our quarterly operating results may fluctuate.
Our total revenue and operating results may vary significantly from quarter to quarter. The main factors that may affect these fluctuations are:
Each customer's decision to implement our products and services is discretionary, involves a significant commitment of resources and is subject to its budget cycles. In addition, the timing of license revenue is difficult to predict because of the length of our sales cycle, which has ranged to date from one to twenty-four months. We base our operating expenses on anticipated revenue trends. Because a high percentage of these expenses are relatively fixed, a delay in recognizing revenue from license transactions could cause significant variations in operating results from quarter to quarter and could result in operating losses. If these expenses precede, or are not subsequently followed by, increased revenues, our business, financial condition or results of operations could be materially and adversely affected.
As a result of these and other factors, revenues for any quarter are subject to significant variation, and we believe that period-to-period comparisons of our results of operations are not necessarily meaningful. You should not rely on these comparisons as indications of future performance. Our future quarterly operating results from time to time may not meet the expectations of market analysts or investors, which would likely have an adverse effect on the price of our common stock.
Economic conditions could adversely affect our revenue growth and ability to forecast revenue.
The revenue growth and profitability of our business depends on the overall demand for eBusiness applications software and services, particularly within the industries in which we offer specific versions of our products. Because our sales are primarily to major corporate customers in the high technology, telecommunications, financial services (including insurance), pharmaceutical, utilities and consumer packaged goods industries, our business depends on the overall economic conditions and the economic and business conditions within these industries. The progressive weakening of the global economy, the weakening of the information technology industry, and the weakening of the business conditions within the above industries has caused a decrease in our software license revenues in both 2001 and 2002. A softening of demand for computer software caused by a continued weakening of the economy, domestically or internationally, may result in a continued decrease in revenues and growth rates. In addition, the financial, political, economic and other uncertainties following the terrorist attacks upon the United States have led to a further weakening of the global economy. Subsequent terrorist acts and/or the threat of future outbreak or continued escalation of hostilities involving the United States or other countries could adversely affect the growth rate of the Company's software license revenue and have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations.
A variation in the conversion of our revenue pipeline to contracts could adversely affect our revenues and ability to forecast operations.
Our revenue pipeline estimates may not consistently correlate to actual revenues in a particular quarter or over a longer period of time. A slowdown in the economy, domestically and internationally, has caused and may continue to cause customer purchasing decisions to be delayed, reduced in amount or canceled, all of which have reduced and could continue to reduce the rate of conversion of the pipeline into contracts. A variation in the pipeline or in the conversion of the pipeline into contracts could cause us to plan or budget inaccurately and thereby could adversely affect our business, financial condition or results of operations. In addition, primarily due to a substantial portion of our license revenue contracts closing in the latter part of a quarter, management may not be able to adjust our cost structure in response to a variation in the conversion of the pipeline into contracts in a timely manner, thereby adversely affecting our business, financial condition or results of operations.
We may not be able to successfully implement our restructuring efforts, and such efforts may adversely impact our ability to retain and attract future employees.
In July 2002, we announced a restructuring of our operations involving, among other things, the reduction of our workforce by approximately 1,200 employees worldwide and the consolidation of certain excess facilities. As part of this restructuring, we may permanently remove from our operations or terminate certain of our leased facilities, which may require the Company to negotiate certain lease terminations and/or subleases of our facilities. We cannot predict when or if we will be successful in negotiating lease termination agreements or subleases of our facilities on terms acceptable to us. Should we be unsuccessful in such negotiations or if the negotiated terms are less favorable than currently anticipated, we may be required to materially increase our restructuring charge in future periods. In addition, we cannot assure you that our restructuring program will achieve all of the benefits we currently anticipate or on the timetable contemplated.
Workforce reductions, including the one we announced in July 2002, could result in a temporary lack of focus and reduced productivity by our remaining employees, which in turn may affect our revenues in the current or a future quarter. In addition, prospects and current customers may decide to delay or not purchase our products due to the perceived uncertainty caused by our restructuring. We cannot assure you that we will not reduce or otherwise adjust our workforce again in the future or that the related transition issues associated with such a reduction will not occur again. In addition, employees directly affected by the reduction may seek future employment with our business partners, customers or competitors. Although our employees are required to sign a confidentiality agreement at the time of hire, we cannot assure you that the confidential nature of certain proprietary information will be maintained in the course of such future employment. Further, we believe that our future success will depend in large part upon our ability to attract and retain highly skilled personnel. We may have difficulty attracting such personnel as a result of a perceived risk of future workforce reductions.
If we do not successfully manage the size of our operations, our business may be negatively impacted.
If we fail to manage the size of our operations effectively, our business, financial condition or results of operations could be materially and adversely affected. Since we began operations in 1994 and continuing throughout early 2001, our business grew rapidly. Throughout the last nine months of 2001 and the first six months of 2002, our revenues have declined as a result of deterioration in the overall economy and information technology industry. These rapid changes in our business have placed a significant strain on our management systems and resources. In response to the continued deterioration in the information technology industry, management announced a restructuring of our operations in July 2002. This restructuring has its own risks, many of which are discussed above under "We may not be able to successfully implement our restructuring efforts, and such efforts may adversely impact our ability to retain and attract future employees." In addition, if we return to growth in the future, that growth may require us to implement new systems or upgrade current systems, and the failure to successfully implement such new or improved systems could materially and adversely affect our business.
Our success will require us to manage the size of our employee base, particularly our direct sales force and global support staff.
The majority of our expenses are personnel-related costs such as employee compensation and benefits, along with the cost of the infrastructure (occupancy and equipment) to support our employee base. The failure to adjust our employee base, particularly our direct sales force and technical and global services staff, to the appropriate level to support our revenues could materially and adversely affect our business, operating results and financial condition. In addition, expansion of the distribution of our products may place new and increased demands on our direct sales force and technical and sales support staff. Although we currently invest sufficient resources in our direct sales force and our technical and global services staff, there are only a limited number of qualified personnel in these areas. Our ability to achieve expanded distribution and revenue growth in the future will depend, in part, on our success in recruiting and training sufficient direct sales, technical and global services personnel. We may not be able to expand our direct sales force and technical support staff as necessary to support our operations.
We rely on strategic relationships with systems integrators, distributors, resellers and technology vendors.
Failure to maintain existing strategic relationships with systems integrators, distributors, resellers and technology vendors, or to establish new relationships in the future, could have a material adverse effect on our business. We have established strategic relationships with a number of organizations that we believe are important to our sales, marketing and support activities and the implementation of our products. We believe that our relationships with these organizations provide marketing and sales opportunities for our direct sales force and expand the distribution of our products. These relationships allow us to keep pace with the technological and marketing developments of major software vendors and provide us with technical assistance for our product development efforts.
In particular, we have established non-exclusive strategic relationships with Accenture, Cap Gemini Ernst & Young, Deloitte Consulting, IBM Global Services, and PricewaterhouseCoopers, among others. A significant portion of our revenues has historically been derived from customers that have engaged systems integrators with which we have a relationship. Any deterioration of our relationship with these significant third-party systems integrators could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations. We also have relationships with technology vendors such as IBM Corporation; Compaq Computer Corporation; Microsoft Corporation; and Sun Microsystems, Inc., among others. Failure to maintain existing relationships on terms equally favorable to us, or to establish new relationships in the future, could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations.
Our current and potential customers may also rely on third-party systems integrators to develop, deploy or manage Siebel eBusiness Applications. If we do not adequately train a sufficient number of systems integrators, or if these integrators do not have, or do not devote, the resources necessary to implement our products, our business, financial condition or results of operations could be materially and adversely affected.
We may not be able to compete effectively in the Internet-related products and services market.
Siebel eBusiness Applications communicate through public and private networks over the Internet. The success of our products may depend, in part, on our ability to continue developing products that are compatible with the Internet. We cannot predict with any assurance whether the demand for Internet-related products and services will increase or decrease in the future. The increased commercial use of the Internet could require substantial modification and customization of our products and the introduction of new products.
Critical issues concerning the commercial use of the Internet, including security, privacy, demand, reliability, cost, ease of use, accessibility, quality of service and potential tax or other government regulation remain unresolved and may affect the use of the Internet as a medium to support the functionality of our products and distribution of our software. If these critical issues are not favorably resolved, our business, financial condition or results of operations could be materially and adversely affected.
We operate in a competitive and rapidly changing market.
If the Web-based applications market fails to grow, our business, operating results and financial condition could be materially and adversely affected. The market for Web-based applications software is relatively new, highly competitive and rapidly changing. We market our products only to customers who have migrated or are in the process of migrating their enterprise computing systems to Web-based computing environments. Our future financial performance will partly depend on the continued growth of organizations successfully adopting Web-based computing environments.
Our customers may not successfully implement our products.
If existing customers have difficulty deploying Siebel eBusiness Applications or for any other reason are not satisfied with Siebel eBusiness Applications, our business, operating results and financial condition could be materially and adversely affected. Many of our customers purchase and implement our products in phases. Our customers frequently deploy our products to large numbers of sales, marketing and customer service personnel. These end users may not accept our products. Our products are also being deployed on a variety of computer hardware platforms and used with a number of third-party software applications and programming tools. This use may present significant technical challenges, particularly as large numbers of personnel attempt to use our products concurrently.
A limited number of products provide a substantial part of our license revenues.
A substantial majority of our license revenues are attributable to sales of Siebel Sales, Siebel Service, Siebel Call Center, Siebel Analytics, Siebel Interactive Selling and related products. In addition, we offer industry-specific versions of these products. We expect that these products and related consulting, maintenance and training services will continue to account for a majority of our future revenues. Our success depends in part on our ability to market and maintain the industry-specific versions of our products. Factors adversely affecting the cost and pricing of, or demand for, these products, such as competition or technological change, could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations.
The length of time required to engage a client and to implement our products may be lengthy and unpredictable.
The timing of the sales and implementation of our products and services is lengthy and not predictable with any degree of accuracy. Prior sales and implementation cycles should not be relied upon as any indication of future cycles. The license of our software products is often an enterprise-wide decision by prospective customers and generally requires us to provide a significant level of education to prospective customers regarding the use and benefits of our products. In addition, the implementation of our products involves a significant commitment of resources by prospective customers and is commonly associated with reengineering efforts that may be performed by the customer or third-party systems integrators. The cost to the customer of our product is typically only a portion of the related hardware, software, development, training and integration costs of implementing a large-scale eBusiness software system. For these and other reasons, the period between initial contact and the implementation of our products is often lengthy and is subject to a number of factors that may cause significant delays, over many of which we have little or no control. These factors include the size and complexity of the overall project and delays in our customers' implementation of Web-based computing environments. A delay in the sale or implementation of even a limited number of license transactions could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations and cause our operating results to vary significantly from quarter to quarter.
Our distribution channels may create additional risks.
Failure to minimize channel conflicts could materially and adversely affect our business, operating results and financial condition. We have a number of relationships with resellers, which assist us in obtaining broad market coverage. We have generally avoided exclusive relationships with resellers of our products. Discount policies and reseller licensing programs are intended to support each distribution channel with a minimum level of channel conflicts.
Our revenue is concentrated in a relatively small number of customers.
Our success depends on gaining new customers and maintaining relationships with our existing customers. From quarter to quarter, a relatively small number of customers generally account for a significant percentage of our revenues. We expect that licenses of our products to a limited number of customers will continue to account for a significant percentage of revenue in an individual quarter for the foreseeable future; however, because the top ten customers vary from quarter to quarter, we anticipate that license revenues from the top ten customers for an entire fiscal year will be less significant. For the six months ended June 30, 2002, software license revenues from our 10 largest customers accounted for approximately 26% of total software license revenues. The failure to successfully market our products to new customers or to new industries, or the loss of a small number of customers or any reduction or delay in orders by any such customer, could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations.
Our continued success will require us to keep pace with technological developments, evolving industry standards and changing customer needs.
The software market in which we compete is characterized by: (i) rapid technological change; (ii) frequent introductions of new products; (iii) changing customer needs; and (iv) evolving industry standards. To keep pace with technological developments, evolving industry standards and changing customer needs, we must support existing products and develop new products (e.g., Siebel 7, which was released in the fourth quarter of 2001). We may not be successful in developing, marketing and releasing new products or new versions of Siebel eBusiness Applications that respond to technological developments, evolving industry standards or changing customer requirements. We may also experience difficulties that could delay or prevent the successful development, introduction and sale of these enhancements. In addition, these enhancements may not adequately meet the requirements of the marketplace and may not achieve any significant degree of market acceptance. If release dates of any future products or enhancements to Siebel eBusiness Applications are delayed, or if these products or enhancements fail to achieve market acceptance when released, our business, operating results and financial condition could be materially and adversely affected. In addition, new products or enhancements by our competitors may cause customers to defer or forego purchases of our products, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations.
To be successful, we must effectively compete in the eBusiness systems market.
Our products target the eBusiness systems market. This market is highly competitive, rapidly changing and significantly affected by new product introductions and other market activities of industry participants. Our products are targeted at the emerging market for customer, partner and employee relationship information systems. We face competition primarily from our customers' internal information technology departments and systems integrators, as well as from other application software providers that offer a variety of products and services designed to address this market. We believe that most customer deployments have been the result of large internal development projects, custom solutions from systems integrators or the application of personal and departmental productivity tools to the global enterprise. We may not be able to compete successfully against such internal development efforts.
We frequently rely on a number of systems consulting and systems integration firms for a substantial portion of implementation and other global services, as well as for recommendations of our products during the evaluation stage of the purchase process. Although we seek to maintain close relationships with these service providers, many of them have similar and often more established relationships with our competitors. If we are unable to develop and retain effective, long-term relationships with these third parties, our competitive position could be materially and adversely affected. Further, many of these third parties have significantly greater resources than we do and may market software products that compete with us and may otherwise reduce or discontinue their relationships with or support of us and our products.
A large number of personal, departmental and other products exist in the eBusiness applications market. Our competitors include a number of companies that compete with us primarily within a particular product line (e.g., analytics, interactive selling, etc.) and/or the prospective customer's industry (e.g., life sciences, financial services, etc.). These companies include Amdocs Limited; CAS GmbH; Chordiant Software, Inc.; Dendrite International, Inc.; E.piphany, Inc.; FrontRange Solutions, Inc.; Interact Commerce Corporation; JD Edwards & Company; Kana Software, Inc.; ONYX Software Corporation; Pivotal Corporation; and Salesforce.com, Inc., among many others. In addition, our competitors include several companies, such as Oracle Corporation, PeopleSoft, Inc. and SAP AG, that compete in a majority of the Company's product lines. Some of these competitors have longer operating histories; significantly greater financial, technical, marketing and other resources; significantly greater name recognition; and a larger installed base of customers than we do. In addition, many competitors have well-established relationships with our current and potential customers. As a result, these competitors may be able to respond more quickly to new or emerging technologies and changes in customer requirements or to devote greater resources to the development, promotion and sale of their products than we can.
There are many factors that may increase competition in the eBusiness systems market, including: (i) entry of new competitors; (ii) alliances among existing competitors; (iii) alliances between our competitors and systems integrators; (iv) consolidation in the software industry or amongst systems integrators; and (v) technological changes or changes in the use of the Internet. Increased competition may result in price reductions, reduced gross margins or loss of market share, any of which could materially and adversely affect our business, operating results and financial condition. We cannot assure you that we will be able to compete successfully against current and future competitors or that competitive pressures faced by us will not materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition or results of operations.
If we do not maintain our relationships with third-party vendors, interruptions in the supply of our products may result.
We may not be able to replace the functionality provided by the third-party software currently offered with our products if that software becomes obsolete or incompatible with future versions of our products or is not adequately maintained or updated. Portions of our products incorporate software that was developed and is maintained by third-party software developers. Although we believe there are other sources for these products, any significant interruption in the supply of these products could adversely impact our sales unless and until we can secure another source. We depend in part on these third parties' abilities to enhance their current products, to develop new products on a timely and cost-effective basis and to respond to emerging industry standards and other technological changes. The absence of or any significant delay in the replacement of functionality provided by third-party software in our products could materially and adversely affect our sales.
Software errors or defects in our products could reduce revenues.
Software products frequently contain errors or failures, especially when first introduced or when new versions are released, and could be affected by viruses. We have, in the past, been forced to delay the commercial release of products until the correction of software problems. We could lose revenues as a result of software viruses, errors or defects, including defects in third-party products with which our products work. Our products are intended for use in applications that may be critical to a customer's business. As a result, we expect that our customers and potential customers will have a greater sensitivity to product defects than the market for software products generally. Testing errors may also be found in new products or releases after commencement of commercial shipments, resulting in loss of revenue or delay in market acceptance, damage to our reputation, or increased service and warranty costs, any of which could have a material adverse effect upon our business, financial condition or results of operations.
We need to successfully integrate acquisitions.
Our business strategy includes pursuing opportunities to grow our business, both internally and through selective acquisitions, investments, joint ventures and strategic alliances. Our ability to implement this strategy depends, in part, on our success in making such acquisitions, investments, joint ventures and strategic alliances on satisfactory terms and successfully integrating them into our operations. Implementation of this strategy may impose significant strains on our management, operating systems and financial resources. Failure to manage this growth, or unexpected difficulties encountered during expansion, could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations.
Integration of personnel and operations relating to our previous or future acquisitions may disrupt our business and management.
We acquired two companies during 2001, nQuire Software, Inc. and Sales.com, Inc., and may acquire additional companies in the future. We may not be able to successfully assimilate the additional personnel, operations, acquired technology and products acquired from these companies into our business. In particular, we will need to assimilate and retain key professional services, sales, engineering and marketing personnel. Key personnel from the acquired companies have in certain instances decided, and they may in the future decide, to pursue other opportunities. In addition, it may be necessary to integrate products of these companies with our technology, and it is uncertain whether we may accomplish this easily or at all. These integration difficulties could disrupt our ongoing business, distract management and employees or increase expenses. Acquisitions are inherently risky, and we may also face unexpected costs, which may adversely affect operating results in any quarter.
If we acquire additional companies, products or technologies, we may face risks similar to those faced in our other acquisitions.
We may continue to make other investments in complementary companies, products or technologies. We may not realize the anticipated benefits of any other acquisition or investment. If we acquire another company, we will likely face the same risks, uncertainties and disruptions as discussed above with respect to our other acquisitions. In addition, our profitability may suffer because of acquisition-related costs or amortization costs for acquired intangible assets.
Rising energy costs and power system shortages in California may result in increased operating expenses and reduced net income and harm to our operations due to power loss.
In 2001, the western United States (and California in particular) experienced significant power shortages, and such shortages may continue or worsen in the near future. As a result, energy costs in California, including natural gas and electricity, may rise significantly relative to the rest of the United States. Because our principal operating facilities are located in California, our operating expenses may increase significantly if this shortage recurs. In addition, certain of our operations or facilities may be subject to "rolling blackouts" or other unscheduled interruptions of electrical power. A sustained or frequent power failure could disrupt our operations and the operations of our third-party service providers, which would limit our ability to provide our products and services to our customers, harming our customer relationships and having an adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations.
The loss of key personnel could negatively affect our performance.
Our performance depends on the continued service of our key technical, sales and senior management personnel, particularly Thomas M. Siebel, our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer. None of our key employees has entered into an employment agreement with us. The loss of the services of one or more of our executive officers could have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results and financial condition. To integrate into our company, new senior personnel must spend a significant amount of time learning our business model and management system, in addition to performing their regular duties. Accordingly, until new senior personnel become familiar with our business model and systems, their integration may result in some disruption to our ongoing operations.
Catastrophic events could negatively affect our information technology infrastructure.
The efficient operation of our business, and ultimately our operating performance, depends on the uninterrupted use of our critical business and information technology systems. Many of these systems require the use of specialized hardware and other equipment that is not readily available. A significant portion of these critical business and information technology systems are concentrated in the San Francisco Bay Area. We are currently in the process of creating redundant communications and customer service infrastructure in several geographic locations to ensure uninterrupted service and system back up. Until we complete the creation of the duplicate systems, in the event of a natural disaster, a fire or other catastrophic event such as the recent terrorist attacks upon the United States, in the San Francisco Bay Area that results in the destruction of these systems, the replacement of these systems and restoration of the archived data and normal operation of our business could take several days to several weeks. During the intervening period when our critical business and information technology systems are inoperable, our ability to conduct normal business operations could be significantly and adversely impacted and as a result our business, financial condition or results of operations could be adversely affected.
Leverage and debt service obligations may adversely affect our cash flow.
As of June 30, 2002, we have $300.0 million of convertible subordinated notes outstanding, bearing interest at 5.50% and due September 15, 2006 (see Note 3 to the accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements). While our current cash and short-term investments are sufficient to pay our current outstanding indebtedness, we cannot assure you that any future financing arrangements will be available, or if available, on terms acceptable to us. Our current or future leverage could have negative consequences, including:
We may not be able to protect our proprietary information.
We rely primarily on a combination of patent, copyright, trade secret and trademark laws; confidentiality procedures; and contractual provisions to protect our proprietary rights. We also believe that the technological and creative skills of our personnel, new product developments, frequent product enhancements, name recognition and reliable product maintenance are essential to establishing and maintaining a technology leadership position. We seek to protect our software, documentation and other written materials under patent, trade secret and copyright laws, which afford only limited protection. Any patents issued to us may be invalidated, circumvented or challenged. Any of our pending or future patent applications, whether or not being currently challenged, may not be issued with the scope of the claims we seek, if at all. Furthermore, others may develop technologies that are similar or superior to our technology or design around our patents.
Despite our efforts to protect our proprietary rights, unauthorized parties may attempt to copy aspects of our products or to obtain and use information that we regard as proprietary. Policing unauthorized use of our products is difficult. In addition, the laws of some foreign countries do not protect our proprietary rights as fully as do the laws of the United States. Our means of protecting our proprietary rights in the United States or abroad may not be adequate. We have entered into agreements with substantially all of our customers that require us to place Siebel eBusiness Applications source code into escrow. Such agreements generally provide that such parties will have a limited, non-exclusive right to use such code if: (i) there is a bankruptcy proceeding by or against us; (ii) we cease to do business; or (iii) we fail to meet our support obligations.
Although we do not believe that we are infringing any proprietary rights of others, third parties may claim that we have infringed their intellectual property rights. Furthermore, former employers of our former, current or future employees may assert claims that such employees have improperly disclosed to us the confidential or proprietary information of such former employers. Any such claims, with or without merit, could: (i) be time consuming to defend; (ii) result in costly litigation; (iii) divert management's attention and resources; (iv) cause product shipment delays; and (v) require us to pay monetary damages or enter into royalty or licensing agreements. A successful claim of product infringement against us and our failure or inability to license or create a workaround for such infringed or similar technology may materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition or results of operations.
We license certain software from third parties. These third-party software licenses may not continue to be available to us on acceptable terms. The loss of, or inability to maintain, any of these software licenses could result in shipment delays or reductions. This could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition or results of operations.
Our international operations involve unique risks.
Our revenues are primarily derived from large multinational companies. To service the needs of these companies, we must provide worldwide product support services. We have expanded and in the future may expand our international operations and enter additional international markets. This will require significant management attention and financial resources that could adversely affect our operating margins and earnings. We may not be able to maintain or increase international market demand for Siebel eBusiness Applications. If we do not, our international sales will be limited and our business, financial condition or results of operations could be materially and adversely affected.
Our international operations are subject to a variety of risks, including: (i) foreign currency fluctuations; (ii) economic or political instability; (iii) shipping delays; and (iv) various trade restrictions. Any of these risks could have a significant impact on our ability to deliver products on a competitive and timely basis. Significant increases in the level of customs duties, export quotas or other trade restrictions could also have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations. In situations where direct sales or purchases are denominated in foreign currency, any fluctuation in the exchange rate may adversely affect our business, financial condition or results of operations. We manage our foreign currency exchange rate risk by entering into contracts to sell or purchase foreign currency at the time a foreign currency receivable or payable is generated. When the foreign currency asset or liability is extinguished, the contract is liquidated, and the resulting gain or loss on the contract mitigates the exchange rate risk of the associated asset or liability. In certain instances, we have not hedged foreign currency receivables and payables when the forward contracts in the relevant currency were not readily available or were not cost effective.
Some of our stockholders may be able to exercise control over matters requiring stockholder approval.
Our current officers, directors and entities affiliated with us together beneficially owned a significant portion of the outstanding shares of common stock as of June 30, 2002. While these stockholders do not hold a majority of our outstanding common stock, they will be able to exercise significant influence over matters requiring stockholder approval, including the election of directors and the approval of mergers, consolidations and sales of our assets. This may prevent or discourage tender offers for our common stock.
Our stock price may continue to be volatile.
Our stock price has fluctuated substantially since our initial public offering in June 1996. The trading price of our common stock is subject to significant fluctuations in response to variations in quarterly operating results; the gain or loss of significant orders; changes in earning estimates by analysts; changes in our revenue and/or earnings expectations as announced in our earnings call; announcements of technological innovations or new products by us or our competitors; changes in the domestic and international economic, political and business conditions; general conditions in the software and computer industries; the recent lack of confidence in corporate governance and accounting practices; and other events or factors. In addition, the stock market in general has experienced extreme price and volume fluctuations that have affected the market price for many companies in industries similar or related to ours and that have been unrelated to the operating performance of these companies. These market fluctuations have adversely affected and may continue to adversely affect the market price of our common stock.
Provisions in our charter documents may prevent certain corporate actions.
Our Board of Directors is authorized to issue up to 2,000,000 shares of preferred stock and to determine the price, rights, preferences, privileges and restrictions, including voting rights, of those shares without any further approval by our stockholders. One of these shares has been designated Series A1 Preferred Stock, which was issued in connection with the acquisition of Janna Systems Inc. Please see Note 5 to the accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements for a more detailed description of the Series A1 Preferred Stock. Preferred stock could be issued with voting, liquidation, dividend and other rights superior to those of the common stock. The rights of the holders of common stock will be subject to and may be adversely affected by the rights of the holders of any preferred stock that may be issued in the future. The issuance of preferred stock, while providing desirable flexibility in connection with possible acquisitions and other corporate purposes, could make it more difficult for a third party to acquire a majority of our outstanding voting stock. We have a classified Board of Directors. This and certain other provisions of our certificate of incorporation and certain provisions of our bylaws and of Delaware law could delay or make more difficult a merger, tender offer or proxy contest.
Due to these and other factors, we may not meet expectations of securities analysts or investors with respect to revenues or other operating results of the combined company, which could adversely affect our stock price.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk.
The tables below provide information about our derivative financial instruments and financial instruments that are subject to market risk. The first table includes our foreign currency contracts used to minimize the impact of changes in currency rates on existing foreign currency receivables, payables and intercompany balances, which are subject to exchange rate risk. The second table includes our available-for-sale short-term investments, which are subject to interest rate risk.
We manage our foreign currency exchange rate risk by entering into contracts to sell or buy foreign currency at the time a foreign currency receivable or payable is generated. When the foreign currency asset or liability is extinguished, the contract is liquidated, and the resulting gain or loss on the contract mitigates the exchange rate risk of the associated asset or liability.
The following summarizes as of June 30, 2002, our foreign currency forward contracts, by currency. All of our foreign currency forward contracts mature within a year. Contract amounts are representative of the expected payments to be made under these instruments (in thousands):
Contract Amount Contract Fair (Local Currency) Amount Value (US$) --------------- --------- ------------ Australian dollars ("AUD") (contracts to pay AUD/receive US$)................ (AUD) 2,893 US$1,508 $ (143) Brazilian real ("BRL") (contracts to pay BRL/receive US$)................... (BRL) 4,047 US$1,725 $ 296 Canadian dollars ("CAD") (contracts to pay CAD/receive US$)................ (CAD) 7,316 US$4,734 $ (78) Japanese yen ("YEN") (contracts to pay Yen/receive US$)................... (YEN) 1,780,566 US$13,857 $ (751) Mexican peso ("MXN") (contracts to pay MXN/receive US$)................ (MXN) 24,703 US$2,470 $ (48) Singapore dollars ("SGD") (contracts to pay SGD/receive US$)................ (SGD) 74 US$50 $ (8) British pounds ("GBP") (contracts to receive GBP/pay EUR)................... (GBP) 853 EUR 613 $ 280 Czech Republic koruna (contracts to receive CZK/pay EUR)................... (CZK) 64,176 EUR 2,128 $ 19 Euro ("EUR") (contracts to receive EUR/pay US$)........................... (EUR) 129,653 US$117,281 $ 8,781 Korea won (contracts to receive KRW/pay US$)........................... (KRW) 1,638,939 US$1,332 $ 18 Swedish krona ("SEK") (contracts to receive SEK/pay EUR)................... (SEK) 17,417 EUR 1,904 $ 28 Swiss franc ("CHF") (contracts to receive CHF/pay EUR)................... (CHF) 12,119 EUR 8,341 $ (82)
The following summarizes the Company's short-term investments and the weighted average yields, as of June 30, 2002 (in thousands):
Expected Maturity Date ----------------------------------------------------------------- There- 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 after Total --------- --------- -------- -------- -------- -------- --------- US Treasury and Agency securities............ $63,831 $153,560 $62,440 $11,234 -- $1,876 $292,941 Weighted average yield.. 2.19% 2.45% 3.05% 3.44% -- 4.06% Corporate bonds......... $133,048 $227,244 $97,834 $62,220 $37,656 $28,735 $586,737 Weighted average yield.. 2.08% 2.78% 3.54% 3.51% 4.98% 4.76% Asset-backed securities. $21,977 $61,128 $113,741 $50,471 $8,050 $2,636 $258,003 Weighted average yield.. 1.95% 2.69% 3.81% 4.10% 4.83% 5.05%
As of June 30, 2002, we had an investment portfolio of fixed income securities, excluding those classified as cash and cash equivalents, of $1,137.7 million. These securities, like all fixed income instruments, are subject to interest rate risk and will decline in value if market interest rates increase. If market interest rates were to increase immediately and uniformly by 100 basis points from levels as of June 30, 2002, the fair value of the portfolio would decline by $16.0 million.
We manage our interest rate risk by maintaining an investment portfolio with debt instruments of high credit quality and relatively short average maturities. We also manage interest rate risk by maintaining sufficient cash and cash equivalent balances such that we are typically able to hold our investments to maturity.
We are exposed to equity price risks on marketable equity securities. These investments are in publicly traded companies in the high technology industry sector. We typically do not attempt to reduce or eliminate our market exposure on these securities. A 10% adverse change in the equity price would result in an approximate $0.6 million decrease in the fair value of our marketable equity securities as of June 30, 2002.
The fair value of our convertible subordinated debenture fluctuates based upon changes in the price of our common stock, changes in interest rates and changes in our credit-worthiness. The fair market value of the convertible subordinated debenture as of June 30, 2002, was $298.9 million.
Part II. Other Information
Item 1. Legal Proceedings.
We are subject to legal proceedings and claims, either asserted or unasserted, that arise in the ordinary course of business. While the outcome of these proceedings and claims cannot be predicted with certainty, management does not believe that the outcome of any of these legal matters will have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
The Company's Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the "Annual Meeting") was held on June 6, 2002. At the Annual Meeting, the stockholders of the Company: (i) elected each of the persons below to serve as a director of the Company until the 2005 Annual Meeting of Stockholders or until his successor is elected, and (ii) ratified the selection of KPMG LLP as the Company's independent auditors for the year ending December 31, 2002. The following sets forth the results of the voting at the Annual Meeting.
The first proposal related to the election of Thomas M. Siebel, James C. Gaither and Marc F. Racicot to serve as directors of the Company until the 2005 Annual Meeting of Stockholders or until their successors are elected. The other directors whose terms of office continued after the meeting were Patricia A. House, Eric E. Schmidt, Ph.D., A. Michael Spence, Ph.D., Charles R. Schwab, and George T. Shaheen. The votes for and withheld for such nominees were as follows:
NAME FOR AGAINST - -------------------- ------------ ------------ Thomas M. Siebel 355,177,945 43,251,552 James C. Gaither 387,677,437 10,752,060 Marc F. Racicot 393,595,814 4,833,683
The second proposal related to the selection of KPMG LLP as the Company's independent auditors for the year ending December 31, 2002. There were 387,814,611 votes cast in favor of the proposal and 9,141,796 votes cast against the proposal. There were 1,473,090 abstentions and no broker non-votes.
Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K.
(a) Exhibits.
Exhibit |
Description of Document |
2.1 |
Arrangement Agreement dated September 11, 2000, among the Registrant, certain indirectly wholly owned subsidiaries of the Registrant, and Janna Systems Inc. (1) |
3.1 |
Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Registrant, as amended to date. (2) |
3.2 |
Bylaws of the Registrant. (3) |
4.1 |
Reference is made to Exhibit 3.1 and Exhibit 3.2. |
4.2 |
Specimen Stock Certificate. (3) |
4.3 |
Restated Investor Rights Agreement, dated December 1, 1995, between the Registrant and certain investors, as amended April 30, 1996 and June 14, 1996. (3) |
4.4 |
Certificate of Designation of Series A1 Preferred Stock of the Registrant. (1) |
4.5 |
Indenture between the Registrant, as Issuer, and Chase Manhattan Bank and Trust Company, National Association, as Trustee, dated September 15, 1999. (4) |
10.1 |
Registrant's 1996 Equity Incentive Plan, as amended. (5) |
10.2 |
Registrant's Employee Stock Purchase Plan, as amended. (6) |
10.3 |
Form of Indemnity Agreement entered into between the Registrant and its officers and directors. (3) |
10.4 |
Registrant's Deferred Compensation Plan, dated January 10, 1997. (7) |
10.5 |
Lease Agreement, dated June 4, 1996, by and between the Registrant and Crossroad Associates and Clocktower Associates, as amended. (3) |
10.5.1 |
Amendments to Lease Agreement, by and between the Registrant and Crossroad Associates and Clocktower Associates. (8) |
10.6 |
Lease Agreement, dated March 11, 1999, by and between the Registrant and Sobrato Interests III, as amended. (9) |
10.6.1 |
First Amendment to Lease dated June 11, 1999, and Second Amendment to Lease dated July 31, 1999. (10) |
10.7 |
Lease Agreement, dated March 11, 1999, by and between the Registrant and Sobrato Interests III, as amended. (9) |
10.7.1 |
First Amendment to Lease dated June 11, 1999, and Second Amendment to Lease dated July 31, 1999. (10) |
10.8 |
Lease Agreement, dated June 11, 1999, by and between the Registrant and Sobrato Interests III, as amended. (9) |
10.8.1 |
First Amendment to Lease dated September 23, 2000. (10) |
10.9 |
Lease Agreement, dated August 16, 1999, by and between the Registrant and Spieker Properties, L.P., as amended. (9) |
10.9.1 |
Amendment Number One to Lease, dated October 26, 2000, and Amendment Number Two to Lease, dated June 29, 2001. (8) |
10.10 |
Registrant's 1998 Equity Incentive Plan, as amended. (11) |
99.1 |
Certification pursuant Section 906 of the Corporate Fraud Accountability Act of 2002. (8) |
__________________
(1) Incorporated by reference to the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on November 27,
2000.
(2) Incorporated by reference to the Registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30,
2001.
(3) Incorporated by reference to the Registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-1 (No. 333-03751), as
amended.
(4) Incorporated by reference to the Registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-3 (No. 333-91777) filed on
November 30, 1999.
(5) Incorporated by reference to the Registrant's Definitive Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A filed on
September 17, 1999.
(6) Incorporated by reference to the Registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-07983), as
amended.
(7) Incorporated by reference to the Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 1996.
(8) Filed herewith.
(9) Incorporated by reference to the Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
1999.
(10) Incorporated by reference to the Registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
September 30, 2000.
(11) Incorporated by reference to the Registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-72218), as
amended.
(b) Reports on Form 8-K.
None.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirement of the Security Exchange Act
registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
Dated: August 7, 2002
SIEBEL SYSTEMS, INC.
(Registrant)
By:
/s/ Kenneth A. Goldman
Kenneth A. Goldman
Senior Vice President, Finance and
Administration and
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
Exhibit 10.5.1
SECOND AMENDMENT OF LEASE
This Second Amendment of Lease is made and entered into this 19th day of March, 1997, by and between Crossroads Associates and Clocktower Associates (Landlord), and Siebel Systems, Inc. a California Corporation (Tenant).
RECITALS
A. WHEREAS, Landlord and Tenant entered into a Lease dated June 4th, 1996, (the Lease) for the lease of approximately 66,426 gross square feet of space located in the five story Building located at 1855 South Grant Street, San Mateo, San Mateo County, California; and
B. WHEREAS, by letter dated October 30th, 1996 Tenant exercised Tenant's option to lease the fourth floor of 1875 South Grant Street, and by letter dated December 17th, 1996, Tenant exercised Tenant's option to lease the tenth floor of the 1875 South Grant Street Building; and
C. WHEREAS, by First Amendment of Lease dated March 17, 1997 Landlord agreed to lease to Tenant and Tenant agreed to lease from Landlord 12,926 rentable square feet of space located on the first floor of 1875 South Grant Street, commencing April 1st, 1997, contingent upon Landlord obtaining a lease termination agreement with California Federal Bank, which lease termination agreement was not obtained thereby rendering the First Amendment of Lease void;
D. WHEREAS, Tenant desires to lease an additional 12,926 gross square feet of space (which includes Tenant's proportionate share of Building common areas) located on the first floor of the Building located at 1875 South Grant Street, San Mateo, San Mateo County, California, thereby bringing Tenant's total leased area to 114,756 rentable square feet (66,426 s.f. + 35,404 s.f. + 12,926 s.f.).
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and other good and valuable consideration, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, Landlord and Tenant agree as follows:
1. The Premises to be leased hereunder shall hereinafter be referred to as the First Floor 1875 Space" and is described as follows: 12,926 rentable square feet of space, which includes Tenant's prorata share of Building common areas, located on the first floor of the Building located at 1875 South Grant Street, San Mateo, San Mateo County, California and as further outlined in red on Exhibit "A".
2. Effective Date and Termination Date
The "Effective Date" shall hereinafter be defined as April 1st, 1998. The Lease Termination Date for the First Floor 1875 Space shall be co-terminus with the space leased by Tenant at 1855 South Grant Street and therefore shall be August 7th, 2006. Landlord and Tenant further agree Tenant's Lease of the First Floor 1875 Space shall be subject to the options to extend the Lease per paragraph 48 of the Lease.
3. Upon the Effective Date, Landlord agrees to lease to Tenant and Tenant agrees to lease and hire from Landlord the First Floor 1875 Space as defined above.
4. Tenant agrees to lease the First Floor 1875 Space in an as-is condition, and any alteration or modifications to the Premises shall be made in accordance with paragraphs 8 & 9 of the Lease and shall not delay the commencement of Lease for the First Floor 1875 Space nor delay the payment of rent and all such modifications shall be at Tenant's sole cost and expense. Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, Landlord agrees to provide Tenant an allowance equal to the cost to recarpet the First Floor 1875 Space with building standard carpet and building standard base and to repaint the First Floor 1875 Space. The allowance to be provided herein shall be in the form of a credit against Basic Rent due and owing from Tenant to Landlord, and said allowance shall be credited to Tenant in the month succeeding the installation of new carpet, base, and paint for the applicable areas.
5. Basic Rent
Commencing on the Effective Date, Tenant's monthly Basic Rent for the First Floor 1875 Space shall be l2,926s.f. x $2.30 = $29,729.80 per month. This amount shall be adjusted on August 7th, 1998 and annually thereafter per the terms and limitations described in paragraph 38 of the Lease. For example, if effective August 7th, 1998 the annual rent adjustment described in paragraph 38 of the Lease is 2.4% then Effective August 7th, 1998 Tenant's Basic Rent for the First Floor 1875 Space will be adjusted as follows: $29,729.80 x 1.04 = $30,918.99. This amount will be adjusted annually thereafter according to paragraph 38.
6. Additional Rent
Upon the Effective Date, Tenant's Additional Rent as described in paragraph 4D of the Lease shall be increased by the then current rate being charged to tenants occupying Building 1875 and shall continue to be adjusted per the terms and conditions of paragraph 4D. For example if the Additional Rent per square foot per month for space in the 1875 Building as of the Effective Date was $0.62/square foot/month, commencing upon the Effective Date, Tenant's Additional Rent would be increased by the following amount: 12,926 s.f. x $0.62 per square foot per month = $8,014 per month.
7. Parking
Upon the Effective Date, Tenant's allocated number of parking spaces in the Complex shall be increased by 40 spaces.
8. Landlord and Tenant mutually acknowledge and agree that neither Landlord nor Tenant have had any dealings with any real estate brokers or agents in connection with the negotiation of this First Amendment of Lease which has resulted in any obligation to pay a leasing commission.
Except as herein modified the Lease shall remain in full force and effect.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have signed this First Amendment of Lease, which for reference purposes shall be deemed to have been dated as the day above written.
LANDLORD: |
TENANT: |
CROSSROADS ASSOCIATES, and |
SIEBEL SYSTEMS, Inc., a |
/s/ Boyd Smith Title Partner |
/s/ Howard H. Graham Title Senior Vice President and CFO |
THIRD AMENDMENT OF LEASE
This Third Amendment of Lease is made and entered into this 1st day of September, 1997, by and between Crossroads Associates and Clocktower Associates (Landlord), and Siebel Systems, Inc. a California Corporation (Tenant).
RECITALS
A. WHEREAS, Landlord and Tenant entered into a Lease dated June 4th, 1996, (the Lease) for the lease of approximately 66,426 gross square feet of space located in the five story Building located at 1855 South Grant Street, San Mateo, San Mateo County, California; and
B. WHEREAS, by letter dated October 30th, 1996 Tenant exercised Tenant's option to lease the fourth floor of 1875 South Grant Street, and by letter dated December 17th, 1996, Tenant exercised Tenant's option to lease the tenth floor of the 1875 South Grant Street Building; and.
C. WHEREAS, by First Amendment of Lease dated March 17, 1997 Landlord agreed to lease to Tenant and Tenant agreed to lease from Landlord 12,926 rentable square feet of space located on the first floor of 1875 South Grant Street, commencing April 1st, 1997, contingent upon Landlord obtaining a lease termination agreement with California Federal Bank, which lease termination agreement was not obtained thereby rendering the First Amendment of Lease void;
D. WHEREAS, by Second Amendment of Lease dated March 19, 1997 Tenant leased an additional 12,926 gross square feet of space (which includes Tenant's proportionate share of Building common areas) located on the first floor of the Building located at 1875 South Grant Street, San Mateo, San Mateo County, California (the "First Floor 1875 Space"); and
E. WHEREAS, by letter dated May 23, 1997, Tenant exercised Tenant's Option to lease the ninth floor of 1875 South Grant Street, and by letter dated July 28th, 1997 Tenant exercised Tenant's Option to lease the Eighth floor of 1875 South Grant Street, thereby bringing Tenant's total leased area (subject to the Ninth floor becoming available) 150,160 gross square feet of space.
F. WHEREAS, Tenant wishes to lease directly from Landlord Suite 130, 1875 South Grant Street, which Suite 130 is included in and is a part of the First Floor 1875 space as referred to above and as is defined in paragraph 1 of the Second Amendment of Lease. Tenant's direct lease of Suite 130 is to commence prior to the commencement of lease date for the First Floor 1875 space of April 1st, 1998 as is currently provided for. In order to allow Tenant to do so, California Federal Bank, has agreed to modify its May 18, 1990 lease with Landlord (the "Cal Fed Lease") to eliminate Suite 130 from the Cal Fed Lease premises. In addition, California Federal Bank and InCOMMON, LLC have agreed to modify the February 21, 1997 Sublease between CalFed and inCommon (the inCommon Sublease") to eliminate Suite 130 from the inCommon subleased premises.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and other good and valuable consideration, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, Landlord and Tenant agree as follows;
1. Suite 130. The Premises tube leased hereunder shall hereinafter be referred to as "Suite 130" and is described as follows: 4,114 rentable square feet of space, which includes Tenant's prorata share of Building common areas, located on the First Floor of the Building located at 1875 South Grant Street, San Mateo, San Mateo County, California and as further outlined in red on Exhibit "A." Suite 130 is a part of the First Floor 1875 Space as referred to above.
2. Effective Date and Termination Date. The "Effective Date" shall hereinafter be defined as September 1, 1997. The Lease Termination Date for Suite 130 shall be co-terminus with the space leased by Tenant at 1855 South Grant Street and therefore shall be August 7, 2006. Landlord and Tenant further agree Tenant's lease of Suite 130 shall be subject to the options to extend the Lease per paragraph 48 of the Lease.
3. Agreement to Lease. Upon the Effective Date, Landlord agrees to lease Tenant and Tenant agrees to lease and hire from Landlord Suite 130 as defined above.
4. Premises As-Is. Tenant agrees to lease Suite 130 in an "as-is" condition, and any alteration or modifications to the Premises shall be made in accordance with paragraphs 8 & 9 of the Lease and shall not delay the commencement of Lease for Suite 130 nor delay the payment of rent and all such modifications shall be at Tenant's sole cost and expense.
5. Basic Rent. Commencing on the Effective Date, Tenant's monthly Basic Rent for Suite 130 shall be 4,114 s.f. x $1.35 = $5,553.90 per month. This amount shall be adjusted on April 1st, 1998, which is the Effective Date for the First Floor 1875 Space. From and after April 1st, 1998, the Basic Rent for Suite 130 shall be as described in paragraph 5 of the Second Amendment of Lease.
6. Additional Rent
Upon the Effective Date, Tenant's Additional Rent for Suite 130 shall be $2,550.68 per month. This amount shall be increased on April 1st, 1998 to the then current rate being charged to tenants occupying Building 1875 and shall continue to be adjusted per the terms and conditions of paragraph 4D of the Lease.
7. Parking
Upon the Effective Date, Tenant's allocated number of parking spaces in the Complex shall be increased by 13 spaces.
8. No Brokers. Landlord and Tenant mutually acknowledge and agree that neither Landlord nor Tenant have had any dealings with any real estate brokers or agents in connection with the negotiation of this Third Amendment of Lease which has resulted in any obligation to pay a leasing commission.
9. Lease in Full Force and Effect. Except as herein modified the Lease shall remain in full force and effect.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have signed this Third Amendment of Lease, which for reference purposes shall be deemed to have been dated as the day above written.
LANDLORD: |
TENANT: |
CROSSROADS ASSOCIATES, and |
SIEBEL SYSTEMS, Inc., a |
/s/ Boyd Smith Title ___________ |
/s/ Howard H. Graham Title Senior Vice President and CFO |
FOURTH AMENDMENT OF LEASE
This Fourth Amendment of Lease is made and entered into this 2nd day of April, 1998, by and between Crossroads Associates and Clocktower Associates (Landlord), and Siebel Systems, Inc. a California Corporation (Tenant).
RECITALS
A. WHEREAS, Landlord and Tenant entered into a Lease dated June 4th, 1996, (the Lease) for the lease of approximately 66,426 gross square feet of space located in the five story Building located at 1855 South Grant Street, San Mateo, San Mateo County, California; and
B. WHEREAS, by letter dated October 30th, 1996 Tenant exercised Tenant's option to lease the fourth floor of 1875 South Grant Street, and by letter dated December 17th, 1996, Tenant exercised Tenant's option to lease the tenth floor of the 1875 South Grant Street Building; and
C. WHEREAS, by First Amendment of Lease dated March 17, 1997 Landlord agreed to lease to Tenant and Tenant agreed to lease from Landlord 12,926 rentable square feet of space located on the first floor of 1875 South Grant Street, commencing April 1st, 1997, contingent upon Landlord obtaining a lease termination agreement with California Federal Bank, which lease termination agreement was not obtained thereby rendering the First Amendment of Lease void; and
D. WHEREAS, by Second Amendment of Lease dated March 19, 1997 Tenant leased an additional 12,926 gross square feet of space (which includes Tenant's proportionate share of Building common areas) located on the first floor of the Building located at 1875 South Grant Street, San Mateo, San Mateo County, California (the First Floor 1875 Space); and
E. WHEREAS, by letter dated May 23, 1997, Tenant exercised Tenant's Option to lease the ninth floor of 1875 South Grant Street, and by letter dated July 28th, 1997 Tenant exercised Tenant's Option to lease the Eighth floor of 1875 South Grant Street, thereby bringing Tenant's total leased area (subject to the Ninth floor becoming available) to 150,160 gross square feet of space.
F. WHEREAS, by Third Amendment of Lease dated September 1st, 1997 Landlord and Tenant agreed to an early commencement of lease for Suite 130, 1875 South Grant Street, such that the Suite 130 Lease commenced September 1st, 1997.
G. WHEREAS, Tenant desires to make certain modifications to Tenant's Leased Premises in the Building at 1875 South Grant Street, San Mateo, which Tenant improvements will result in an increased need for parking over and above the amount of parking spaces allocated to Tenant under the Lease and Landlord has agreed to allocate to Tenant additional parking.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and other good and valuable consideration, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, Landlord and Tenant agree as follows:
1. The total number of parking spaces allocated to Tenant under the Lease is summarized as follows:
Location of |
Square Footage |
Parking Spaces |
1855 |
66,426 |
200 |
In addition to the number of parking spaces granted to Tenant for the Leased Premises as summarized above, Landlord hereby agrees to provide and grant Tenant an additional 45 parking spaces throughout the term of Tenant's Lease or any extension thereof thereby bringing Tenant's total parking allocation to 396 + 45 = 441. If during Tenant's tenancy Landlord, in Landlord's sole opinion, deems it necessary to specifically designate an area in which the additional 45 spaces referred to herein shall be located, Landlord reserves the right to so designate a specific area and Tenant agrees to use Tenant's best efforts to encourage Tenant's employees to so park in the designated area. The designated area may be within the parking area of the Complex, or may be upon an adjacent parcel or parcels immediately to the north of the Complex.
2. Compensation. As compensation to Landlord for the additional parking allocation of 45 spaces Tenant agrees to pay Landlord, in addition to all other Basic and Additional Rent due under the lease, the following amounts:
Commencing upon the completion of Tenant's improvements for the 10th floor (1875) Premises, Tenant shall pay landlord $6,250.00 per month, with partial months prorated. Upon completion of Tenant's improvements for the 8th floor (1875) Premises, the $6,25000 monthly amount shall be increased to $12,500.00 per month. This shall be paid and adjusted as indicated in the table below:
Time Period |
Monthly Amount |
(per above) - 12/31/2002 |
$ 12,500.00 |
1/1/2003 - 08/07/2006(1) |
$ 13,000.00 |
__________
(1)(end of original lease term)
(2)(provided that
the Lease is extended per Tenant's first option).
(3)(provided
Tenant exercises its second option to extend).
3. Restoration. Tenant has submitted to Landlord a tentative schematic plan which reflects Tenant's intentions to reconfigure the eighth and tenth floors in the Building at 1875 South Grant Street. This preliminary plan is dated November 7, 1997 and is attached as Exhibit "A" to this Fourth Amendment of Lease. Landlord hereby approves Tenant's preliminary plans subject to Landlord's final review of the actual p1ans, finish schedules, and specifications which are to plans subject to Landlord's final review of the actual p1ans, finish schedules, and specifications which are to be submitted from Tenant to Landlord per paragraph 8 & 9 of the Lease. Pursuant to Paragraphs 8 & 9 of the Lease, should Tenant make the modifications as indicated, Tenant's restoration requirements for each of the floors so modified will be as follows:
a) Construct seven private offices at each "side" of each
floor.
b) Reinstall the entire 1oop corridor on each floor.
c) Add two 15 x 15 rooms on each side of each floor.
d) Make all necessary mechanical, electrical, fire sprinkler
and other modifications necessary to achieve the above including compliance with
any building code requirements then in effect at the time such restoration is to
be performed.
e) With respect to finishes and other building standard
materials, Tenant will restore all materials and finishes to the building
standard unless unless otherwise approved and accepted in writing by
Landlord.
A preliminary drawing of the configuration of the Premises after the restoration is performed is attached as Exhibit "B" to this Fourth Amendment of Lease. All restoration required hereunder shall be at Tenant's sole cost and expense and shall be performed in accordance with paragraphs 8 and 9 of the Lease.
4. Lease in full force and effect. Except as herein modified the Lease shall remain in full force and effect.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have signed this Fourth Amendment of Lease, which for reference purposes shall be deemed to have been dated as the day above written.
LANDLORD: |
TENANT: |
CROSSROADS ASSOCIATES, and |
SIEBEL SYSTEMS, Inc., a |
/s/ Boyd Smith Title Partner |
/s/ Kevin A. Johnson Title Vice President, Legal Affairs |
FIFTH AMENDMENT TO LEASE
This Fifth Amendment of Lease is made and entered into this 8th day of May, 1998, by and between Crossroads Associates and Clocktower Associates (Landlord), and Siebel Systems, Inc. a California Corporation (Tenant).
RECITALS
A. WHEREAS, Landlord and Tenant entered into a Lease dated June 4th, 1996, (the Lease) for the lease of approximately 66,426 gross square feet of space located in the five story Building located at 1855 South Grant Street, San Mateo, San Mateo County, California; and
B. WHEREAS, by letter dated October 30th, 1996 Tenant exercised Tenant's option to lease the fourth floor of the Building located at 1875 South Grant Street, San Mateo, San Mateo County, California (and hereinafter referred to as the 1875 Building) and by letter dated December 17th, 1996, Tenant exercised Tenant's option to lease the tenth floor of the 1875 Building; and
C. WHEREAS, by First Amendment of Lease dated March 17, 1997 Landlord agreed to lease to Tenant and Tenant agreed to lease from Landlord 12,926 rentable square feet of space located on the first floor of the 1875 Building, commencing April 1st, 1997, contingent upon Landlord obtaining a lease termination agreement with California Federal Bank, which lease termination agreement was not obtained thereby rendering the First Amendment of Lease void; and
D. WHEREAS, by Second Amendment of Lease dated March 19, 1997 Tenant leased an additional 12,926 gross square feet of space located on the first floor of the 1875 Building; and
E. WHEREAS, by letter dated May 23, 1997, Tenant exercised Tenant's Option to lease the ninth floor of the 1875 Building, and by letter dated July 28th, 1997 Tenant exercised Tenant's Option to lease the Eighth floor of the 1875 Building, thereby bringing Tenant's total leased area (subject to the Ninth floor becoming available) to 150,160 gross square feet of space; and
F. WHEREAS, by Third Amendment of Lease dated September 1st, 1997 Landlord and Tenant agreed to an early commencement of lease for Suite 130, in the 1875 Building, such that the Suite 130 Lease commenced September 1st, 1997.
G. WHEREAS, by Fourth Amendment of Lease dated April 2nd, 1998, Landlord and Tenant agreed that Landlord will allow Tenant to make certain improvements to Tenant's Premises in the 1875 Building and Tenant further agreed to additional compensation for additional parking.
H. WHEREAS, Bay Networks exercised its option to extend its lease on the ninth floor of the 1875 Building, thereby making Tenant's exercise of option to lease the ninth floor void and therefore bringing Tenant's total leased area to 132,458 square feet.
I. WHEREAS, in the 1875 Building Tenant now desires to lease an additional 9,453 square feet on the second floor and 6,973 square feet on the third floor (which include Tenant's proportionate share of building common areas), thereby bringing Tenant's total leased area to 148,884 square feet.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and other good and valuable consideration, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, Landlord and Tenant agree as follows:
1. The areas to be leased hereunder are all located in the Building located at 1875 South Grant Street, San Mateo, San Mateo County, California and are further described as follows:
a) Suite 200
Comprising 8,007 square feet of rentable space, including Tenant's prorata share of Building common areas, located on the second floor and as further described in red on Exhibit "Al".
b) Suite 220
Comprising 1,376 gross square feet of space, which includes Tenant's prorata share of Building common areas, located on the second floor and as further outlined in red on Exhibit "Al".
c) Suite 350
Comprising 6,973 rentable square feet of space, which includes Tenant's prorata share of Building common areas, located on the third floor and as further outlined in red on Exhibit "A2".
Tenant hereby acknowledges that all three suites to be leased hereunder, Suite 200, 220 and 350, are currently leased to other tenants. Tenant's Lease of Suite 200 and Suite 350 are each contingent upon Landlord entering into, in Landlord's sole opinion, an acceptable Lease Termination Agreement, specifying the date upon which such leases shall terminate (each a "Lease Termination Date"), with each of the respective tenants that lease and occupy Suites 200 & 350. In the event Landlord does not enter into such a lease termination agreement with respect to the tenants leasing suite 200 or 350, then the provisions of this Fifth Amendment of Lease applicable to the suite for which Landlord does not enter such lease termination agreement shall be void and of no force and effect between the parties and neither Landlord nor Tenant shall be liable to one another for having entered into this Fifth Amendment of Lease with respect to such space. All other terms and conditions of the Lease, including the other terms and conditions of this Fifth Amendment of Lease, shall remain in full force and effect.
2. EFFECTIVE DATE
The "Effective Date" for the commencement of Lease for Suites 200 and 350 shall be the calendar date immediately succeeding the Lease Termination Date for Suite 200 and 350 respectively. The Effective Date for Suite 220 shall be the later of September 1st, 1998 or the date Landlord delivers possession of Suite 220 to Tenant. It is anticipated by Landlord and Tenant that the Effective Date for Suite 200 shall be June 16, 1998 and for Suite 350 August 1st, 1998.
3. TERM
The Term of Lease for Suite 200, 220, and 350, shall each commence upon the Effective Date for each of the respective Suites and shall terminate August 31st, 2008. Landlord and Tenant each acknowledge that the expiration date of the term of Lease for Suites 200, 220, and 350 leased hereunder is different from the expiration date of the term of lease for the 1855 Building and Tenant's lease for the 1st, 4th, 8th and 10th floor spaces in the 1875 Building, (hereinafter referred to for purposes of this Fifth Amendment of Lease as the "Core Space"). In the event the term of Tenant's lease for the Core Space expires and Tenant vacates the Core Space, nevertheless, the term of lease for Suites 200, 220 and 350 leased hereunder shall expire August 31st, 2008 and all the terms and conditions of the Lease shall remain in full force and effect and shall pertain to the space leased under this Fifth Amendment of Lease. Furthermore, it is hereby agreed that the Lease for Suite 200, 220 and 350 shall be subject to the Option to Extend granted to Tenant per paragraph 48 of the Lease. In the event that Tenant exercises its option to extend the Lease on the Core Space (as defined above) such that the Lease for the Core Space is extended to July 31st, 2011, then the Lease for Suites 200, 220 and 350 shall automatically be extended from August 31st, 2008 to July 31st, 2011. The Basic and Additional Rent on Suites 200, 220, and 350, for the period September 1st, 2008 to July 31st, 2011 (provided Tenant has exercised its option per paragraph 48 of the Lease) shall be at the same rate as Tenant is then paying on the Core Space.
4. BASIC RENT
The Basic Rent, commencing upon the Effective Date for each of the respective suites, shall be $2.75 per square foot per month multiplied by the square footage leased, as follows:
Suite |
Square Footage |
Basic Rent/Sq. Ft. |
Total monthly |
200 |
8,007 |
$2.75 |
$22,019.25 |
The Basic Rent described above shall be adjusted August 8th, 1998 and annually thereafter, in the same manner and upon the same date and with the same limitations as described in paragraph 38 of the Lease.
Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, for each of the Suites 200, 220, and 350, Landlord hereby grants Tenant two months Basic Rent abatement on such suite. Such Basic Rent Abatement shall be granted to Tenant irrespective whether Tenant occupies the Premises or not during the two month period immediately following the Effective Date for each Suite. For example, if the Effective Date for Suite 200 were June 16th, 1998, Tenant's lease on Suite 200 would commence June 16th, 1998, and the Basic Rent described above for Suite 200 would commence August 16th, 1998.
5. ADDITIONAL RENT
For calendar year 1998, commencing upon the Effective Date for each Suite, Tenant shall pay $0.62 per square foot per month as payment for Tenant's proportionate share of the expenses of operation, management, and maintenance of Tenant's Premises. Therefore upon the Effective Date for each suite Tenant's Additional Rent is as follows:
Suite |
Square Footage |
Monthly |
200 |
8,007 |
$4,964.34 |
6. AS-IS
Tenant agrees to lease each suite hereunder in an "as- is" condition, and any alteration or modification to the Premises shall be made in accordance with paragraphs 8 & 9 of the Lease at Tenant's sole cost and expense and shall not delay the commencement of Lease for each of the Suites nor delay the payments of rent.
7. PARKING
On the Effective Date for each Suite, Tenant's total parking allocation shall be increased as follows:
Suite 200 25 spaces
Suite 220 4 spaces
Suite 350 22 spaces
8. NO BROKERS
Landlord and Tenant mutually acknowledge that neither Landlord nor Tenant have had any dealings with any real estate brokers or agents in connection with the negotiation of this Fifth Amendment of Lease which has resulted in any obligation to pay a leasing commission.
9. LEASE IN FULL FORCE AND EFFECT
Except as herein and modified the Lease shall remain in full force and effect.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have signed this Fifth Amendment of Lease, which for reference purposes shall be deemed to have been dated as the date above written.
LANDLORD: |
TENANT: |
CROSSROADS ASSOCIATES, and |
SIEBEL SYSTEMS, Inc., a |
/s/ Boyd Smith Title Partner |
/s/ Kevin A. Johnson Title Vice President, Legal Affairs |
[Crossroads Logo] |
1875 SOUTH GRANT STREET |
August 25, 1998
Ms. Linda Jansen
Siebel Systems, Inc.
1855 South Grant
Street
San Mateo, CA 94402
RE: SIEBEL SYSTEM, INC. - LEASE AGREEMENT
Dear Ms. Jansen:
As you know, there are several typographical errors in the Fifth Amendment of Lease. While the total square footage is correct, clarification is necessary with respect to Suite 200. Therefore, Landlord and Tenant do herein agree to the following corrections:
PARAGRAPH 1.(a) Suite 200
Comprising 8,077 square feet of rentable space, including Tenant's prorata share of Building common areas, located on the second floor and as further described in red on Exhibit "A".
PARAGRAPH 4. BASIC RENT
This paragraph remains unchanged, except for the following change to the Basic Rent Schedule:
Suite |
Square Footage |
Basic Rent/Sq. Ft. |
Total monthly |
200 |
8,007 |
$2.75 |
$22,211.75 |
PARAGRAPH 5. ADDITIONAL RENT
This paragraph remains unchanged, except for the following change to the Additional Rent Schedule:
Suite |
Square Footage |
Monthly |
200 |
8,007 |
$5,007.74 |
Sincerely,
/s/ Peter Klayman
Peter
Klayman
SIXTH AMENDMENT OF LEASE
This Sixth Amendment of Lease is made and entered into this 16th day of September, 1998, by and between Crossroads Associates and Clocktower Associates (Landlord), and Siebel Systems, Inc. a California Corporation (Tenant).
RECITALS
A. WHEREAS, Landlord and Tenant entered into a Lease dated June 4th, 1996, (the Lease) for the lease of approximately 66,426 gross square feet of space located in the five story Building located at 1855 South Grant Street, San Mateo, San Mateo County, California; and
B. WHEREAS, by letter dated October 30th, 1996 Tenant exercised Tenant's option to lease the fourth floor of the Building located at 1875 South Grant Street, San Mateo, San Mateo County, California (and hereinafter referred to as the 1875 Building) and by letter dated December 17th, 1996, Tenant exercised Tenant's option to lease the tenth floor of the 1875 Building; and
C. WHEREAS, by First Amendment of Lease dated March 17, 1997 Landlord agreed to lease to Tenant and Tenant agreed to lease from Landlord 12,926 rentable square feet of space located on the first floor of the 1875 Building, commencing April 1st, 1997, contingent upon Landlord obtaining a lease termination agreement with California Federal Bank, which lease termination agreement was not obtained thereby rendering the First Amendment of Lease void; and
D. WHEREAS, by Second Amendment of Lease dated March 19, 1997 Tenant leased an additional 12,926 gross square feet of space located on the first floor of the 1875 Building; and
E. WHEREAS, by letter dated May 23, 1997, Tenant exercised Tenant's Option to lease the ninth floor of the 1875 Building, and by letter dated July 28th, 1997 Tenant exercised Tenant's Option to lease the Eighth floor of the 1875 Building, thereby bringing Tenant's total leased area (subject to the Ninth floor becoming available) to 150,160 gross square feet of space; and
F. WHEREAS, by Third Amendment of Lease dated September 1st, 1997 Landlord and Tenant agreed to an early commencement of lease for Suite 130, in the 1875 Building, such that the Suite 130 Lease commenced September 1st, 1997.
G. WHEREAS, by Fourth Amendment of Lease dated April 2nd, 1998, Landlord and Tenant agreed that Landlord will allow Tenant to make certain improvements to Tenant's Premises in the 1875 Building and Tenant further agreed to additional compensation for additional parking.
H. WHEREAS, Bay Networks exercised its option to extend its lease on the ninth floor of the 1875 Building, thereby making Tenant's exercise of option to lease the ninth floor void and therefore bringing Tenant's total leased area to 132,458 square feet.
I. WHEREAS, by Fifth Amendment of Lease dated May 8, 1998, in the 1875 Building, Tenant leased an additional 9,453 square feet on the second floor and 6,973 square feet on the third floor (which includes Tenant's proportionate share of building common areas), thereby bringing Tenant's total leased area to 148,884 square feet.
J. WHEREAS, in the 1875 Building, Tenant now desires to lease an additional 7,113 square feet on the fifth floor (which includes Tenant's proportionate share of building common areas), thereby bringing Tenant's total leased area to 155,997 square feet.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and other good and valuable consideration, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, Landlord and Tenant agree as follows:
1. The area to be leased hereunder shall hereinafter be referred to as "Suite 500" and is described as follows: 7,113 rentable square feet of space, which includes Tenant's prorata share of Building common areas, located on the fifth floor of the Building located at 1875 South Grant Street, San Mateo, San Mateo County, California and as further outlined in red on Exhibit "A".
2. EFFECTIVE DATE
The "Effective Date" for the commencement of Lease for Suite 500 shall hereinafter be defined as March 1, 1999.
3. TERM
The Term of Lease for Suite 500 shall commence upon the Effective Date and shall terminate August 31st, 2008. Landlord and Tenant each acknowledge that the expiration date of the term of Lease for Suite 500 is different from the expiration date of the term of lease for the 1855 Building and The "Core Space" (as defined in Paragraph 3 of the Fifth Amendment of Lease). In the event the term of Tenant's lease for the Core Space expires and Tenant vacates the Core Space, nevertheless, the term of lease for Suite 500 leased hereunder shall expire August 31st, 2008 and all the terms and conditions of the Lease shall remain in full force and effect and shall pertain to the space leased under this Sixth Amendment of Lease. Furthermore, it is hereby agreed that the Lease for Suite 500 shall be subject to the Option to Extend granted to Tenant per paragraph 48 of the Lease. In the event that Tenant exercises its option to extend the Lease on the Core Space such that the Lease for the Core Space is extended to July 31st, 2011, then the Lease for Suite 500 shall automatically be extended from August 31st, 2008 to July 31st, 2011. The Basic and Additional Rent on Suite 500 for the period September 1st, 2008 to July 31st, 2011 (provided Tenant has exercised its option per paragraph 48 of the Lease) shall be at the same rate as Tenant is then paying on the Core Space.
4. BASIC RENT
Commencing upon the Effective Date, Tenant's monthly Basic Rent for Suite 500 shall be 7,113 s.f. x $2.90 = $20,627.70 per month. This amount shall be adjusted August 8th, 1999 and annually thereafter, in the same manner and upon the same date and with the same limitations as described in Paragraph 38 of the Lease.
Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, for Suite 500, Landlord hereby grants Tenant two months Basic Rent abatement on such suite. Such Basic Rent Abatement shall be granted to Tenant irrespective whether Tenant occupies the Premises or not during the two month period immediately following the Effective Date. For example, the Effective Date for Suite 500 is March 1st, 1999, Tenant's lease on Suite 500 will commence March 1st, 1999, and the Basic Rent described above for Suite 500 will commence May 1st, 1999.
5. ADDITIONAL RENT
Commencing upon the Effective Date, Tenant's Additional Rent as described in Paragraph 4D of the Lease shall be the then current rate being charged to tenants occupying Building 1875 and shall continue to be adjusted per the terms and conditions of Paragraph 4D.
6. AS-IS
Tenant agrees to lease suite 500 hereunder in an "as-is" condition, and any alteration or modification to the Premises shall be made in accordance with paragraphs 8 & 9 of the Lease at Tenant's sole cost and expense and shall not delay the commencement of Lease for Suite 500 nor delay the payment of rent.
7. PARKING
Upon the Effective Date for Suite 500, Tenant's total parking allocation shall be increased by 22 spaces.
8. NO BROKERS
Landlord and Tenant mutually acknowledge that neither Landlord nor Tenant have had any dealings with any real estate brokers or agents in connection with the negotiation of this Sixth Amendment of Lease which has resulted in any obligation to pay a leasing commission.
9. LEASE IN FULL FORCE AND EFFECT
Except as herein and modified the Lease shall remain in full force and effect.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have signed this Fifth Amendment of Lease, which for reference purposes shall be deemed to have been dated as the date above written.
LANDLORD: |
TENANT: |
CROSSROADS ASSOCIATES, and |
SIEBEL SYSTEMS, Inc., a |
/s/ Boyd Smith Title Partner |
/s/ Jeffrey T. Amann Title Director, Legal Affairs |
SEVENTH AMENDMENT OF LEASE
This Seventh Amendment of Lease is made and entered into this 1st day of December, 1998, by and between Crossroads Associates and Clocktower Associates (Landlord), and Siebel Systems, Inc. a California Corporation (Tenant).
RECITALS
A. WHEREAS, Landlord and Tenant entered into a Lease dated June 4th, 1996, (the Lease) for the lease of approximately 66,426 gross square feet of space located in the five story Building located at 1855 South Grant Street, San Mateo, San Mateo County, California; and
B. WHEREAS, by letter dated October 30th, 1996 Tenant exercised Tenant's option to lease the fourth floor of the Building located at 1875 South Grant Street, San Mateo, San Mateo County, California (and hereinafter referred to as the 1875 Building) and by letter dated December 17th, 1996, Tenant exercised Tenant's option to lease the tenth floor of the 1875 Building; and
C. WHEREAS, by First Amendment of Lease dated March 17, 1997 Landlord agreed to lease to Tenant and Tenant agreed to lease from Landlord 12,926 rentable square feet of space located on the first floor of the 1875 Building, commencing April 1st, 1997, contingent upon Landlord obtaining a lease termination agreement with California Federal Bank, which lease termination agreement was not obtained thereby rendering the First Amendment of Lease void; and
D. WHEREAS, by Second Amendment of Lease dated March 19, 1997 Tenant leased an additional 12,926 gross square feet of space located on the first floor of the 1875 Building; and
E. WHEREAS, by letter dated May 23, 1997, Tenant exercised Tenant's Option to lease the ninth floor of the 1875 Building, and by letter dated July 28th, 1997 Tenant exercised Tenant's Option to lease the Eighth floor of the 1875 Building, thereby bringing Tenants total leased area (subject to the Ninth floor becoming available) to 150,160 gross square feet of space; and
F. WHEREAS, by Third Amendment of Lease dated September 1st, 1997 Landlord and Tenant agreed to an early commencement of lease for Suite 130, in the 1875 Building, such that the Suite 130 Lease commenced September 1st, 1997.
G. WHEREAS, by Fourth Amendment of Lease dated April 2nd, 1998, Landlord and Tenant agreed that Landlord will allow Tenant to make certain improvements to Tenant's Premises in the 1875 Building and Tenant further agreed to additional compensation for additional parking.
H. WHEREAS, Bay Networks exercised its option to extend its lease on the ninth floor of the 1875 Building, thereby making Tenant's exercise of option to lease the ninth floor void and therefore bringing Tenant's total leased area to 132,458 square feet.
I. WHEREAS, by Fifth Amendment of Lease dated May 8, 1998, in the 1875 Building, Tenant leased an additional 9,453 square feet on the second floor and 6,973 square feet on the third floor (which includes Tenant's proportionate share of building common areas), thereby bringing Tenant's total leased area to 148,884 square feet.
J. WHEREAS, by Sixth Amendment of Lease dated September 16, 1998, in the 1875 Building, Tenant leased an additional 7,113 square feet on the fifth floor (which includes Tenant's proportionate share of building common areas) and which space was further identified as Suite 500, thereby bringing Tenant's total leased area to 155,997 square feet.
K. WHEREAS, Tenant's lease of Suite 500 has an "Effective Date" for the commencement of Lease of March 1, 1999, and Tenant now desires to commence the Lease for Suite 500 at an earlier "Effective Date" as provided for herein.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and other good and valuable consideration, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, Landlord and Tenant agree as follows:
1. Tenant hereby acknowledges that Suite 500 is currently leased to HCIA Inc., as successor-in-interest to Datis Corporation, A California Corporation ("HCIA") with a lease expiration date of February 28, 1999. Landlord's ability to provide Tenant an earlier "Effective Date" for Suite 500 is contingent upon Landlord entering into, in Landlord's sole opinion, an acceptable Early Lease Termination Agreement with HCIA. In the event Landlord does not enter into such an Early Lease Termination Agreement with respect to Suite 500, then the provisions of this Seventh Amendment of Lease shall be void and of no force and effect between the parties and neither Landlord nor Tenant shall be liable to one another for having entered into this Seventh Amendment of Lease. All other terms and conditions of the Lease shall remain in full force and effect and Tenant's "Effective Date" for Suite 500 shall be as provided for in the Sixth Amendment of Lease, and therefore shall be March 1, 1999.
2. EFFECTIVE DATE
The "Effective Date" for the commencement of Tenant's Lease for Suite 500 shall hereinafter be defined as the date which is one day immediately following the Termination Date of the HCIA Lease for Suite 500, but in no event shall the Effective Date be later than March 1, 1999. Except for the commencement date of Lease, all other terms and conditions of Tenant's lease of Suite 500 shall be as provided in the Sixth Amendment.
3. BASIC RENT
Commencing upon the Effective Date, Tenant's monthly Basic Rent for Suite 500 shall be 7,113 s.f. x $2.90 = $20,627.70 per month. This amount shall be adjusted August 8th, 1999 and annually thereafter, in the same manner and upon the same date and with the same limitations as described in Paragraph 38 of the Lease.
Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, for Suite 500, Landlord hereby grants Tenant two months Basic Rent abatement on such suite. Such Basic Rent Abatement shall be granted to Tenant irrespective whether Tenant occupies the Premises or not during the two month period immediately following the Effective Date. For example, if the "Effective Date" as provided for herein becomes December 15, 1998, Tenant's lease on Suite 500 will commence December 15, 1998 and the Basic Rent described above for Suite 500 will commence February 15, 1999.
4. ADDITIONAL RENT
Commencing upon the Effective Date, Tenant's Additional Rent as described in Paragraph 4D of the Lease shall be the then current rate being charged to tenants occupying Building 1875 and shall continue to be adjusted per the terms and conditions of Paragraph 4D.
5. LEASE IN FULL FORCE AND EFFECT
Except as herein and modified, the Lease shall remain in full force and effect.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have signed this Seventh Amendment of Lease, which for reference purposes shall be deemed to have been dated as the date above written.
LANDLORD: |
TENANT: |
CROSSROADS ASSOCIATES, and |
SIEBEL SYSTEMS, Inc., a |
/s/ Boyd Smith Title Partner |
/s/ Jeffrey T. Amann Title Director, Legal Affairs |
EIGHTH AMENDMENT OF LEASE
This Eighth Amendment of Lease is made and entered into this 15th day of January, 1999, by and between Crossroads Associates and Clocktower Associates (Landlord), and Siebel Systems, Inc. a Delaware Corporation (Tenant).
RECITALS
A. WHEREAS, Landlord and Tenant entered into a Lease dated June 4th, 1996, (the Lease) for the lease of approximately 66,426 gross square feet of space located in the five story Building located at 1855 South Grant Street, San Mateo, San Mateo County, California; and
B. WHEREAS, by letter dated October 30th, 1996 Tenant exercised Tenant's option to lease the fourth floor of the Building located at 1875 South Grant Street, San Mateo, San Mateo County, California (and hereinafter referred to as the 1875 Building) and by letter dated December 17th, 1996, Tenant exercised Tenant's option to lease the tenth floor of the 1875 Building; and
C. WHEREAS, by First Amendment of Lease dated March 17, 1997 Landlord agreed to lease to Tenant and Tenant agreed to lease from Landlord 12,926 rentable square feet of space located on the first floor of the 1875 Building, commencing April 1st, 1997, contingent upon Landlord obtaining a lease termination agreement with California Federal Bank, which lease termination agreement was not obtained thereby rendering the First Amendment of Lease void; and
D. WHEREAS, by Second Amendment of Lease dated March 19, 1997 Tenant leased an additional 12,926 gross square feet of space located on the first floor of the 1875 Building; and
E. WHEREAS, by letter dated May 23, 1997, Tenant exercised Tenant's Option to lease the ninth floor of the 1875 Building, and by letter dated July 28th, 1997 Tenant exercised Tenant's Option to lease the Eighth floor of the 1875 Building, thereby bringing Tenant's total leased area (subject to the Ninth floor becoming available) to 150,160 gross square feet of space; and
F. WHEREAS, by Third Amendment of Lease dated September 1st, 1997 Landlord and Tenant agreed to an early commencement of lease for Suite 130, in the 1875 Building, such that the Suite 130 Lease commenced September 1st, 1997.
G. WHEREAS, by Fourth Amendment of Lease dated April 2nd, 1998, Landlord and Tenant agreed that Landlord will allow Tenant to make certain improvements to Tenant's Premises in the 1875 Building and Tenant further agreed to additional compensation for additional parking.
H. WHEREAS, Bay Networks exercised its option to extend its lease on the ninth floor of the 1875 Building, thereby making Tenant's exercise of option to lease the ninth floor void and therefore bringing Tenant's total leased area to 132,458 square feet.
I. WHEREAS, by Fifth Amendment of Lease dated May 8, 1998, in the 1875 Building, Tenant leased an additional 9,453 square feet on the second floor and 6,973 square feet on the third floor (which includes Tenant's proportionate share of building common areas), thereby bringing Tenant's total leased area to 148,884 square feet.
J. WHEREAS, by Sixth Amendment of Lease dated September 16, 1998, in the 1875 Building, Tenant leased an additional 7,113 square feet on the fifth floor (which includes Tenant's proportionate share of building common areas) and which space was further identified as Suite 500, thereby bringing Tenant's total leased area to 155,997 square feet.
K. WHEREAS, by Seventh Amendment of Lease dated December 1, 1998, Tenant agreed to lease Suite 500 prior to March 1, 1999 in the event it became available and Tenant's lease of Suite 500 commenced December 29, 1998.
L. WHEREAS, in the 1875 Building Tenant now desires to lease an additional 810 square feet on the second floor, an additional 3104 square feet on the third floor (which square footage includes Tenant's proportionate share of building common areas), and convert and include Tenant's separate Lease of 1184 square feet on the third floor into this Lease, thereby bringing Tenant's total leased area to 161,095 square feet.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and other good and valuable consideration, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, Landlord and Tenant agree as follows:
1. The areas to be leased hereunder are all located in the Building located at 1875 South Grant Street, San Mateo, San Mateo County, California and are further described as follows:
a) Suite 250
Comprising 810 gross square feet of space, including Tenant's prorata share of Building common areas, located on the second floor and as further described in red on Exhibit "Al".
b) Suite 310A&B
Comprising 1,184 gross square feet of space, which includes Tenant's prorata share of Building common areas, located on the third floor and as further outlined in red on Exhibit "A2".
c) Suite 320
Comprising 3,104 gross square feet of space, which includes Tenant's prorata share of Building common areas, located on the third floor and as further outlined in red on Exhibit "A3".
Tenant hereby acknowledges that under a separate lease agreement Suite 310A&B is currently leased by Tenant through March 31, 1999. The other two suites to be leased hereunder, Suites 250 and 320, are currently leased to RAC Enterprises. Tenant's Lease of Suite 250 and Suite 320 are contingent upon Landlord entering into, in Landlord's sole opinion, an acceptable Lease Termination Agreement with RAC Enterprises. In the event Landlord does not enter into such a lease termination agreement then the provisions of this Eighth Amendment of Lease applicable to Suites 250 and 320 shall be void and of no force and effect between the parties and neither Landlord nor Tenant shall be liable to one another for having entered into this Eighth Amendment of Lease with respect to such space. All other terms and conditions of the Lease, including the other terms and conditions of this Eighth Amendment of Lease, shall remain in full force and effect.
2. EFFECTIVE DATE
Subject to the contingency in paragraph 1 above, the "Effective Date" for the commencement of Lease for Suites 250, 310A&B and 320 shall hereinafter be defined as April 1, 1999.
3. TERM
Subject to the contingency in paragraph 1 above, commencing upon the Effective Date Landlord agrees to lease to Tenant and Tenant agrees to lease and hire from Landlord Suites 310 A & B, 250, and 320. The Term of Lease for Suites 250, 310A&B and 320 shall terminate August 31st, 2008. Landlord and Tenant each acknowledge that the expiration date of the term of Lease for Suites 250, 310A&B, and 320 leased hereunder is different from the expiration date of the term of lease for the 1855. Building and The "Core Space" (as defined in Paragraph 3 of the Fifth Amendment of Lease). In the event the term of Tenant's lease for the Core Space expires and Tenant vacates the Core Space, nevertheless, the term of lease for Suites 250, 310A&B, and 320 leased hereunder shall expire August 31st, 2008 and all the terms and conditions of the Lease shall remain in full force and effect and shall pertain to the space leased under this
Eighth Amendment of Lease. Furthermore, it is hereby agreed that the Lease for Suites 250, 310A&B, and 320 shall be subject to the Option to Extend granted to Tenant per paragraph 48 of the Lease. In the event that Tenant exercises its option to extend the Lease on the Core Space such that the Lease for the Core Space is extended to July 31st, 2011, then the Lease for Suites 250, 310A&B, and 320 shall automatically be extended from August 31st, 2008 to July 31st, 2011. The Basic and Additional Rent on Suites 250, 310A&B, and 320 for the period September 1st, 2008 to July 31st, 2011 (provided Tenant has exercised its option per paragraph 48 of the Lease) shall be at the same rate as Tenant is then paying on the Core Space.
4. BASIC RENT
The Basic Rent, commencing upon the Effective Date for each of the respective suites, shall be $2.90 per square foot per month multiplied by the square footage leased, as follows:
Suite |
Square Footage |
Basic Rent/Sq. Ft. |
Total monthly |
250 |
810 |
$2.90 |
$2,349.00 |
The Basic Rent described above shall be adjusted August 8th, 1999 and annually thereafter, in the same manner and upon the same date and with the same limitations as described in paragraph 38 of the Lease.
Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, for Suites 250 and 320, Landlord hereby grants Tenant two months Basic Rent abatement for each suite. Such Basic Rent Abatement shall be granted to Tenant irrespective whether Tenant occupies the Premises or not during the two month period immediately following the Effective Date for each Suite. For example, the Effective Date for Suites 250 and 320 is April 1st, 1999, Tenant's lease on Suites 250 and 320 will commence April 1st, 1999, and the Basic Rent described above for Suites 250 and 320 will commence June 1st, 1999.
5. ADDITIONAL RENT
Commencing upon the Effective Date, Tenant's Additional Rent for each suite, as described in Paragraph 4D of the Lease, shall be the then current rate per square foot per month being charged to tenants occupying Building 1875 multiplied by the respective square footages and shall continue to be adjusted per the terms and conditions of Paragraph 4D.
6. AS-IS
Tenant agrees to lease each suite hereunder in an "as-is" condition, and any alteration or modification to the Premises shall be made in accordance with paragraphs 8 & 9 of the Lease at Tenant's sole cost and expense and shall not delay the commencement of Lease for each of the Suites nor delay the payments of rent.
7. PARKING
On the Effective Date for each Suite, Tenant's total parking allocation shall be increased as follows:
Suite 250 |
|
2 spaces |
Suite 310A&B |
|
3 spaces |
Suite 320 |
|
10 spaces |
8. NO BROKERS
Landlord and Tenant mutually acknowledge that neither Landlord nor Tenant have had any dealings with any real estate brokers or agents in connection with the negotiation of this Eighth Amendment of Lease which has resulted in any obligation to pay a leasing commission.
9. LEASE IN FULL FORCE AND EFFECT
Except as herein and modified the Lease shall remain in full force and effect.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have signed this Eighth Amendment of Lease, which for reference purposes shall be deemed to have been dated as the date above written.
LANDLORD: |
TENANT: |
CROSSROADS ASSOCIATES, and |
SIEBEL SYSTEMS, Inc., a |
/s/ Boyd Smith Title Partner |
/s/ Jeffrey T. Amann Title Director, Legal Affairs |
NINTH AMENDMENT OF LEASE
This Ninth Amendment of Lease is made and entered into this 26th day of January, 1999, by and between Crossroads Associates and Clocktower Associates (Landlord), and Siebel Systems, Inc. a Delaware Corporation (Tenant).
RECITALS
A. WHEREAS, Landlord and Tenant entered into a Lease dated June 4th, 1996, (the Lease) for the lease of approximately 66,426 gross square feet of space located in the five story Building located at 1855 South Grant Street, San Mateo, San Mateo County, California; and
B. WHEREAS, by letter dated October 30th, 1996 Tenant exercised Tenants option to lease the fourth floor of the Building located at 1875 South Grant Street, San Mateo, San Mateo County, California (and hereinafter referred to as the 1875 Building) and by letter dated December 17th, 1996, Tenant exercised Tenants option to lease the tenth floor of the 1875 Building; and
C. WHEREAS, by First Amendment of Lease dated March 17, 1997 Landlord agreed to lease to Tenant and Tenant agreed to lease from Landlord 12,926 rentable square feet of space located on the first floor of the 1875 Building, commencing April 1st, 1997, contingent upon Landlord obtaining a lease termination agreement with California Federal Bank, which lease termination agreement was not obtained thereby rendering the First Amendment of Lease void; and
D. WHEREAS, by Second Amendment of Lease dated March 19, 1997 Tenant leased an additional 12,926 gross square feet of space located on the first floor of the 1875 Building; and
E. WHEREAS, by letter dated May 23, 1997, Tenant exercised Tenant's Option to lease the ninth floor of the 1875 Building, and by letter dated July 28th, 1997 Tenant exercised Tenant's Option to lease the Eighth floor of the 1875 Building, thereby bringing Tenant's total leased area (subject to the Ninth floor becoming available) to 150,160 gross square feet of space; and
F. WHEREAS, by Third Amendment of Lease dated September 1st, 1997 Landlord and Tenant agreed to an early commencement of lease for Suite 130, in the 1875 Building, such that the Suite 130 Lease commenced September 1st, 1997.
G. WHEREAS, by Fourth Amendment of Lease dated April 2nd, 1998, Landlord and Tenant agreed that Landlord will allow Tenant to make certain improvements to Tenant's Premises in the 1875 Building and Tenant further agreed to additional compensation for additional parking.
H. WHEREAS, Bay Networks exercised its option to extend its lease on the ninth floor of the 1875 Building, thereby making Tenant's exercise of option to lease the ninth floor void and therefore bringing Tenant's total leased area to 132,458 square feet.
I. WHEREAS, by Fifth Amendment of Lease dated May 8, 1998, in the 1875 Building, Tenant leased an additional 9,453 square feet on the second floor and 6,973 square feet on the third floor which includes Tenant's proportionate share of building common areas), thereby bringing Tenant's total leased area to 148,884 square feet.
J. WHEREAS, by Sixth Amendment of Lease dated September 16, 1998, in the 1875 Building, Tenant leased an additional 7,113 square feet on the fifth floor (which includes Tenant's proportionate share of building common areas) and which space was further identified as Suite 500, thereby bringing Tenant's total leased area to 155,997 square feet.
K. WHEREAS, by Seventh Amendment of Lease dated December 1, 1998, Tenant agreed to lease Suite 500 prior to March 1, 1999 in the event it became available and Tenant's lease of Suite 500 commenced December 29, 1998.
L. WHEREAS, by Eighth Amendment of Lease dated January 15, 1999 in the 1875 Building, Tenant leased an additional 810 square feet on the second floor and 4,288 square feet on the third floor(which includes Tenant's proportionate share of building common areas), thereby bringing Tenant's total leased area to 161,095 square feet.
M. WHEREAS, in the 1875 Building Tenant now desires to lease an additional 5,221 square feet on the sixth floor, an additional 2,695 square feet on the seventh floor (which square footage includes Tenant's proportionate share of building common areas), thereby bringing Tenant's total leased area to 169,011 square feet.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and other good and valuable consideration, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, Landlord and Tenant agree as follows:
1. The areas to be leased hereunder are all located in the Building located at 1875 South Grant Street, San Mateo, San Mateo County, California and are further described as follows:
a) Suite 650
Comprising 5,221 gross square feet of space, including Tenant's prorata share of Building common areas, located on the fifth floor and as further described in red on Exhibit "Al".
b) Suite 770
Comprising 2,695 gross square feet of space, which includes Tenant's prorata share of Building common areas, located on the seventh floor and as further outlined in red on Exhibit "A2".
Tenant hereby acknowledges that the two suites to be leased hereunder, Suites 650 and 770, are currently leased to SUNTERRA CORPORATION. Tenant's Lease of Suite 650 and Suite 770 is contingent upon Landlord entering into, in Landlord's sole opinion, an acceptable Lease Termination Agreement with SUNTERRA CORPORATION by February 20, 1999. In the event Landlord does not enter into such a lease termination agreement then this Ninth Amendment of Lease shall be void and of no force and effect between the parties and neither Landlord nor Tenant shall be liable to one another for having entered into this Ninth Amendment of Lease and the Lease shall remain in full force and effect.
2. EFFECTIVE DATE
Subject to Paragraph 1 above, the Effective Dates shall be as follows:
(a) Suite 650 - March 1, 1999
(b) Suite 770 - April 1, 1999
3. TERM
Subject to the contingency in paragraph 1 above, commencing upon the respective Effective Dates Landlord agrees to lease to Tenant and Tenant agrees to lease and hire from Landlord Suites 650 and 770. The Term of Lease for Suites 650 and 770 shall terminate August 31st, 2008. Landlord and Tenant each acknowledge that the expiration date of the term of Lease for Suites 650 and 770 leased hereunder is different from the expiration date of the term of lease for the 1855 Building and The "Core Space" (as defined in Paragraph 3 of the Fifth Amendment of Lease). In the event the term of Tenant's lease for the Core Space expires and Tenant vacates the Core Space, nevertheless, the term of lease for Suites 650 and 770 leased hereunder shall expire August 31st, 2008 and all the terms and conditions of the Lease shall remain in full force and effect and shall pertain to the space leased under this Ninth Amendment of Lease. Furthermore, it is hereby agreed that the Lease for Suites 650 and 770 shall be subject to the Option to Extend granted to Tenant per paragraph 48 of the Lease. In the event that Tenant exercises its option to extend the Lease on the Core Space such that the Lease for the Core Space is extended to July 31st, 2011, then the Lease for Suites 650 and 770 shall automatically be extended from August 31st, 2008 to July 31st, 2011. The Basic and Additional Rent on Suites 650 and 770 for the period September 1st, 2008 to July 31st, 2011 (provided Tenant has exercised its option per paragraph 48 of the Lease) shall be at the same rate as Tenant is then paying on the Core Space.
4. BASIC RENT
The Basic Rent, commencing upon the Effective Date for each of the respective suites, shall be $2.90 per square foot per month multiplied by the square footage leased, as follows:
Suite |
Square Footage |
Basic Rent/Sq. Ft. |
Total monthly |
650 |
5,221 |
$2.90 |
$15,140.90 |
The Basic Rent described above shall be adjusted August 8th, 1999 and annually thereafter, in the same manner and upon the same date and with the same limitations as described in paragraph 38 of the Lease.
Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, for Suites 650 and 770, Landlord hereby grants Tenant two months Basic Rent abatement for each suite. Such Basic Rent Abatement shall be granted to Tenant irrespective whether Tenant occupies the Premises or not during the two month period immediately following the Effective Date for each Suite. For example, the Effective Date for Suite 650 is March 1st, 1999, Tenant's lease on Suite 650 will commence March 1st, 1999, and the Basic Rent described above for Suite 650 will commence May 1st, 1999.
5. ADDITIONAL RENT
Commencing upon the respective Effective Dates, Tenant's Additional Rent for each suite, as described in Paragraph 4D of the Lease, shall be the then current rate per square foot per month being charged to tenants occupying Building 1875 multiplied by the respective square footages and shall continue to be adjusted per the terms and conditions of Paragraph 4D.
6. AS-IS
Tenant agrees to lease each suite hereunder in an "as- is" condition, and any alteration or modification to the Premises shall be made in accordance with paragraphs 8 & 9 of the Lease at Tenant's sole cost and expense and shall not delay the commencement of Lease for each of the Suites nor delay the payments of rent.
7. PARKING
On the Effective Date for each Suite, Tenant's total parking allocation shall be increased as follows:
Suite 650 |
16 spaces |
Suite 770 |
8 spaces |
8. NO BROKERS
Landlord and Tenant mutually acknowledge that neither Landlord nor Tenant have had any dealings with any real estate brokers or agents in connection with the negotiation of this Ninth Amendment of Lease which has resulted in any obligation to pay a leasing commission.
9. LEASE IN FULL FORCE AND EFFECT
Except as herein and modified the Lease shall remain in full force and effect.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have signed this Ninth Amendment of Lease, which for reference purposes shall be deemed to have been dated as the date above written.
LANDLORD: |
TENANT: |
CROSSROADS ASSOCIATES, and |
SIEBEL SYSTEMS, Inc., a |
/s/ Boyd Smith Title Partner |
/s/ Jeffrey T. Amann Title Director, Legal Affairs |
TENTH AMENDMENT OF LEASE
This Tenth Amendment of Lease is made and entered into this 25th day of February, 1999, by and between Crossroads Associates and Clocktower Associates (Landlord), and Siebel Systems, Inc. a Delaware Corporation (Tenant).
RECITALS
A. WHEREAS, Landlord and Tenant entered into a Lease dated June 4th, 1996, (the Lease) for the lease of approximately 66,426 gross square feet of space located in the five story Building located at 1855 South Grant Street, San Mateo, San Mateo County, California; and
B. WHEREAS, by letter dated October 30th, 1996 Tenant exercised Tenant's option to lease the fourth floor of the Building located at 1875 South Grant Street, San Mateo, San Mateo County, California (and hereinafter referred to as the 1875 Building) and by letter dated December 17th, 1996, Tenant exercised Tenant's option to lease the tenth floor of the 1875 Building; and
C. WHEREAS, by First Amendment of Lease dated March 17, 1997 Landlord agreed to lease to Tenant and Tenant agreed to lease from Landlord 12,926 rentable square feet of space located on the first floor of the 1875 Building, commencing April 1st, 1997, contingent upon Landlord obtaining a lease termination agreement with California Federal Bank, which lease termination agreement was not obtained thereby rendering the First Amendment of Lease void; and
D. WHEREAS, by Second Amendment of Lease dated March 19, 1997 Tenant leased an additional 12,926 gross square feet of space located on the first floor of the 1875 Building; and
E. WHEREAS, by letter dated May 23, 1997, Tenant exercised Tenant's Option to lease the ninth floor of the 1875 Building, and by letter dated July 28th, 1997 Tenant exercised Tenant's Option to lease the Eighth floor of the 1875 Building, thereby bringing Tenant's total leased area (subject to the Ninth floor becoming available) to 150,160 gross square feet of space; and
F. WHEREAS, by Third Amendment of Lease dated September 1st, 1997 Landlord and Tenant agreed to an early commencement of lease for Suite 130, in the 1875 Building, such that the Suite 130 Lease commenced September 1st, 1997.
G. WHEREAS, by Fourth Amendment of Lease dated April 2nd, 1998, Landlord and Tenant agreed that Landlord will allow Tenant to make certain improvements to Tenant's Premises in the 1875 Building and Tenant further agreed to additional compensation for additional parking.
H. WHEREAS, Bay Networks exercised its option to extend its lease on the ninth floor of the 1875 Building, thereby making Tenant's exercise of option to lease the ninth floor void and therefore bringing Tenant's total leased area to 132,458 square feet.
I. WHEREAS, by Fifth Amendment of Lease dated May 8, 1998, in the 1875 Building, Tenant leased an additional 9,453 square feet on the second floor and 6,973 square feet on the third floor(which includes Tenant's proportionate share of building common areas), thereby bringing Tenant's total leased area to 148,884 square feet.
J. WHEREAS, by Sixth Amendment of Lease dated September 16, 1998, in the 1875 Building, Tenant leased an additional 7,113 square feet on the fifth floor (which includes Tenant's proportionate share of building common areas) and which space was further identified as Suite 500, thereby bringing Tenant's total leased area to 155,997 square feet.
K. WHEREAS, by Seventh Amendment of Lease dated December 1,1998, Tenant agreed to lease Suite 500 prior to March 1, 1999 in the event it became available and Tenant's lease of Suite 500 commenced December 29, 1998.
L. WHEREAS, by Eighth Amendment of Lease dated January 15, 1999 in the 1875 Building, Tenant leased an additional 810 square feet on the second floor and 4,288 square feet on the third floor (which includes Tenant's proportionate share of building common areas), thereby bringing Tenant's total leased area to 161,095 square feet.
M. WHEREAS, by Ninth Amendment of Lease dated January 25, 1999 in the 1875 Building, Tenant leased an additional 5,221 square feet on the sixth floor and 2,695 square feet on the seventh floor (which includes Tenant's proportionate share of building common areas), thereby bringing Tenant's total leased area to 169,011 square feet.
N. WHEREAS, in the 1875 Building Tenant now desires to lease an additional 4,319 square feet on the second floor (which includes Tenant's proportionate share of building common areas), thereby bringing Tenant's total leased area to 173,330 square feet.
NOW, THERFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and other good and valuable consideration, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, Landlord and Tenant agree as follows:
1. The area to be leased hereunder shall hereinafter be referred to as "Suite 240" and is described as follows: 4,319 gross square feet of space, which includes Tenant's prorata share of Building common areas, located on the second floor of the Building located at 1875 South Grant Street, San Mateo, San Mateo County, California and as further outlined in red on Exhibit "A".
2. EFFECTIVE DATE
The "Effective Date" for the commencement of Lease for Suite 240 shall hereinafter be defined as July 1, 1999.
3. TERM
The Term of Lease for Suite 240 shall commence upon the Effective Date and shall terminate August 31st, 2008. Landlord and Tenant each acknowledge that the expiration date of the term of Lease for Suite 240 is different from the expiration date of the term of lease for the 1855 Building and The "Core Space" (as defined in Paragraph 3 of the Fifth Amendment of Lease) .. In the event the term of Tenant's lease for the Core Space expires and Tenant vacates the Core Space, nevertheless, the term of lease for Suite 240 leased hereunder shall expire August 31st, 2008 and all the terms and conditions of the Lease shall remain in full force and effect and shall pertain to the space leased under this Tenth Amendment of Lease. Furthermore, it is hereby agreed that the Lease for Suite 240 shall he subject to the Option to Extend granted to Tenant per paragraph 48 of the Lease. In the event that Tenant exercises its option to extend the Lease on the Core Space such that the Lease for the Core Space is extended to July 31st, 2011, then the Lease for Suite 240 shall automatically be extended from August 31st, 2008 to July 31st, 2011. The Basic and Additional Rent on Suite 240 for the period September 1st, 2008 to July 31st, 2011 (provided Tenant has exercised its option per paragraph 48 of the Lease) shall be at the same rate as Tenant is then paying on the Core Space.
4. BASIC RENT
Commencing upon the Effective Date, Tenant's monthly Basic Rent for Suite 240 shall be 4,319 s.f. x $2.90 = $12,525.10 per month. This amount shall be adjusted August 8th, 1999 and annually thereafter, in the same manner and upon the same date and with the same limitations as described in Paragraph 38 of the Lease.
Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, for Suite 240, Landlord hereby grants tenant two months Basic Rent abatement on such suite. Such Basic Rent Abatement shall be granted to Tenant irrespective whether Tenant occupies the Premises or not during the two month period immediately following the Effective Date. For example, the Effective Date for Suite 240 is July 1st, 1999, Tenant's lease on Suite 240 will commence July 1st, 1999, and the Basic Rent described above for Suite 240 will commence September 1st, 1999.
5. ADDITIONAL RENT
Commencing upon the Effective Date, Tenant's Additional Rent as described in Paragraph 4D of the Lease shall be the then current rate being charged to tenants occupying Building 1875 and shall continue to be adjusted per the terms and conditions of Paragraph 4D.
6. AS-IS
Tenant agrees to lease each suite hereunder in an "as- is" condition, and any alteration or modification to the Premises shall be made in accordance with paragraphs 8 & 9 of the Lease at Tenant's sole cost and expense and shall not delay the commencement of Lease for each of the Suites nor delay the payments of rent.
7. EARLY OCCUPANCY
In the event that Suite 240 becomes available prior to the applicable Effective Date, and in the event that Tenant desires to take possession of Suite 240 prior to the applicable Effective Date, then with Landlord's permission Tenant may do so. Tenant shall Suite 240 subject to the Early Occupancy provisions of this Paragraph 7 and Tenant's Early Occupancy shall be subject to all the terms and conditions of the Lease. In the event that Suite 240 is available and Tenant so chooses to occupy such space prior to the Effective Date, then the Basic Rent obligations shall be as stated in paragraph 4 herein with the exception that Tenant shall pay Basic and Additional Rent for the period of such Early Occupancy prior to the Effective Date. Such Basic and Additional Rent shall be calculated on a per diem basis for each day of the period commencing with the date of Early Occupancy to the Effective Date. The daily rate of Basic and Additional Rent is as indicated in the table below:
EARLY OCCUPANCY TABLE
Suite |
Square Footage |
Basic Rent per day |
Additional Rent per day |
Total Rent per day |
240 |
4,319 |
$417.50 |
$89.26 |
$506.76 |
8. PARKING
Upon the Effective Date for Suite 240, Tenant's total parking allocation shall be increased by 13 spaces.
9. NO BROKERS
Landlord and Tenant mutually acknowledge that neither Landlord nor Tenant have had any dealings with any real estate brokers or agents in connection with the negotiation of this Tenth Amendment of Lease which has resulted in any obligation to pay a leasing commission.
10. LEASE IN FULL FORCE AND EFFECT
Except as herein and modified the Lease shall remain in full force and effect.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have signed this Tenth Amendment of Lease, which for reference purposes shall be deemed to have been dated as the date above written.
LANDLORD: |
TENANT: |
CROSSROADS ASSOCIATES, and |
SIEBEL SYSTEMS, Inc., a |
/s/ Boyd Smith Title Partner |
/s/ Jeffrey T. Amann Title Director, Legal Affairs |
ELEVENTH AMENDMENT OF LEASE
This Eleventh Amendment of Lease is made and entered into this 7th day of April, 1999, by and between Crossroads Associates and Clocktower Associates (Landlord), and Siebel Systems, Inc. a Delaware Corporation (Tenant).
RECITALS
A. WHEREAS, Landlord and Tenant entered into a Lease dated June 4th, 1996, (the Lease) for the lease of approximately 66,426 gross square feet of space located in the five story Building located at 1855 South Grant Street, San Mateo, San Mateo County, California; and
B. WHEREAS, by letter dated October 30th, 1996 Tenant exercised Tenants option to lease the fourth floor of the Building located at 1875 South Grant Street, San Mateo, San Mateo County, California (and hereinafter referred to as the 1875 Building) and by letter dated December 17th, 1996, Tenant exercised Tenants option to lease the tenth floor of the 1875 Building; and
C. WHEREAS, by First Amendment of Lease dated March 17, 1997 Landlord agreed to lease to Tenant and Tenant agreed to lease from Landlord 12,926 rentable square feet of space located on the first floor of the 1875 Building, commencing April 1st, 1997, contingent upon Landlord obtaining a lease termination agreement with California Federal Bank, which lease termination agreement was not obtained thereby rendering the First Amendment of Lease void; and
D. WHEREAS, by Second Amendment of Lease dated March 19,1997 Tenant leased an additional 12,926 gross square feet of space located on the first floor of the 1875 Building; and
E. WHEREAS, by letter dated May 23, 1997, Tenant exercised Tenant's Option to lease the ninth floor of the 1875 Building, and by letter dated July 28th, 1997 Tenant exercised Tenant's Option to lease the Eighth floor of the 1875 Building, thereby bringing Tenant's total leased area (subject to the Ninth floor becoming available) to 150,160 gross square feet of space; and
F. WHEREAS, by Third Amendment of Lease dated September 1st, 1997 Landlord and Tenant agreed to an early commencement of lease for Suite 130, in the 1875 Building, such that the Suite 130 Lease commenced September 1st, 1997.
G. WHEREAS, by Fourth Amendment of Lease dated April 2nd,1998, Landlord and Tenant agreed that Landlord will allow Tenant to make certain improvements to Tenant's Premises in the 1875 Building and Tenant further agreed to additional compensation for additional parking.
H. WHEREAS, Bay Networks exercised its option to extend its lease on the ninth floor of the 1875 Building, thereby making Tenant's exercise of option to lease the ninth floor void and therefore bringing Tenant's total leased area to 132,458 square feet.
I. WHEREAS, by Fifth Amendment of Lease dated May 8, 1998, in the 1875 Building, Tenant leased an additional 9,453 square feet on the second floor and 6,973 square feet on the third floor (which includes Tenant's proportionate share of building common areas), thereby bringing Tenant's total leased area to 148,884 square feet.
J. WHEREAS, by Sixth Amendment of Lease dated September 16, 1998, in the 1875 Building, Tenant leased an additional 7,113 square feet on the fifth floor (which includes Tenant's proportionate share of building common areas) and which space was further identified as Suite 500, thereby bringing Tenant's total leased area to 155,997 square feet.
K. WHEREAS, by Seventh Amendment of Lease dated December 1, 1998, Tenant agreed to lease Suite 500 prior to March 1, 1999 in the event it became available and Tenant's lease of Suite 500 commenced December 29, 1998.
L. WHEREAS, by Eighth Amendment of Lease dated January 15, 1999 in the 1875 Building, Tenant leased an additional 810 square feet on the second floor and 4,288 square feet on the third floor (which includes Tenant's proportionate share of building common areas), thereby bringing Tenant's total leased area to 161,095 square feet.
M. WHEREAS, by Ninth Amendment of Lease dated January 25, 1999 in the 1875 Building, Tenant leased an additional 5,221 square feet on the sixth floor and 2,695 square feet on the seventh floor (which includes Tenant's proportionate share of building common areas), thereby bringing Tenant's total leased area to 169,011 square feet.
N. WHEREAS, subject to the execution of the Tenth Amendment of Lease dated February 25, 1999 in the 1875 Building, Tenant upon execution will have leased an additional 4,319 square feet on the second floor (which includes Tenant's proportionate share of building common areas), thereby bringing Tenant's total leased area to 173,330 square feet.
O. WHEREAS, in the 1825 Building Tenant now desires to lease an additional 7,509 square feet on the first floor, 11,417 square feet on the fifth floor, 17,702 on the eighth floor and 17,702 square feet on the ninth floor (which includes Tenant's proportionate share of building common areas), thereby bringing Tenant's total leased area to 227,660 square feet.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and other good and valuable consideration, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, Landlord and Tenant agree as follows:
1. The areas to be leased hereunder are all located in the Building located at 1825 South Grant Street, San Mateo, San Mateo County, California and are further described as follows:
a) Suite 150
Comprising 7,509 gross square feet of space, which includes Tenant's prorata share of Building common areas, located on the first floor and as further described in red on Exhibit "Al".
b) Suite 500
Comprising 11,417 gross square feet of space, which includes Tenant's prorate share of Building common areas, located on the fifth floor and as further outlined in red on Exhibit "A2".
c) Suite 800
Comprising 17,702 gross square feet of space, which includes Tenant's prorate share of Building common areas, located on the eighth floor and as further outlined in red on Exhibit "A3".
d) Suite 900
Comprising 17,702 gross square feet of space, which includes Tenant's prorate share of Building common areas, located on the ninth floor and as further outlined in red on Exhibit "A4".
Tenant hereby acknowledges that all four suites to be leased hereunder, Suites 150, 500, 800 and 900, are currently leased to VISA. Tenant's Lease of Suites 150, 500, 800 and 900 is contingent upon Landlord entering into, in Landlord's sole opinion, an acceptable lease termination agreement with VISA for the referenced suites. Landlord and VISA have discussed such an acceptable lease termination agreement, and termination documents have been submitted to VISA for execution. In the event Landlord and VISA do not enter into such a lease termination agreement, then the provisions of this Eleventh Amendment of Lease shall be void and of no force and effect between the parties, neither Landlord nor Tenant shall be liable to one another for having entered into this Eleventh Amendment of Lease, and all other terms and conditions of the Lease shall remain in full force and effect.
2. EFFECTIVE DATE
The Effective Date shall hereinafter be defined as that date which Landlord shall specify to Tenant in writing as the commencement date of the term of Lease for the Premises leased per this 11 Amendment. The Effective date shall not be earlier than November 1, 1999 nor later than January 1, 2000. On or before September 15, 1999, Landlord shall notify Tenant in writing the specific date that shall be the Effective date.
3. TERM
The Term of Lease for Suites 150, 500, 800 and 900 shall commence upon the Effective Date and shall terminate October 31, 2009. Landlord and Tenant each acknowledge that the expiration date of the term of Lease for Suites 150, 500, 800 and 900 is different from the expiration date of the term of lease for other space leased by Tenant, including the expiration date of the term of lease for the 1855 Building and the "Core Space" (as defined in Paragraph 3 of the Fifth Amendment of Lease). In the event the term of Tenant's lease for the Core Space and/or the term of Tenant's lease for other space leased expires and Tenant vacates these spaces, nevertheless, the term of lease for Suites 150, 500, 800 and 900 leased hereunder shall expire October 31, 2009 and all the terms and conditions of the Lease shall remain in full force and effect and shall pertain to the space leased under this Eleventh Amendment of Lease. Furthermore, it is hereby agreed that the Lease for Suites 150, 500, 800 and 900 shall be subject to the Option to Extend granted to Tenant per paragraph 48 of the Lease such that in the event that Tenant exercises its option to extend the Lease on the Core Space such that the Lease for the Core Space is extended to July 31st, 2011, then the Lease for Suites 150, 500, 800 and 900 shall automatically be extended from October 31, 2009 to July 31st, 2011. The Basic and Additional Rent on Suites 150, 500, 800 and 900 for the period November 1st, 2009 to July 31st, 2011 (provided Tenant has exercised its option per paragraph 48 of the Lease) shall be at the same rate as Tenant is paying on the Core Space for that period. As is stated in Paragraph 48 (f), Tenant's second Option to Extend shall apply to all space then leased by Tenant as of the date of the exercise of the second option.
4. BASIC RENT
The Basic Rent for the additional space leased per this Eleventh Amendment, commencing upon the Effective Date, shall be $2.90 per square foot per month multiplied by the square footage leased, as follows:
Suite |
Square Footage |
Basic Rent/Sq. Ft. |
Total monthly |
150 |
7,509 |
$2.90 |
$ 21,776.10 |
The Basic Rent described above shall be adjusted August 8th, 2000 and annually thereafter, in the same manner and upon the same date and with the same limitations as described in paragraph 38 of the Lease.
Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, for Suites 150, 500, 800 and 900, Landlord hereby grants Tenant two months Basic Rent abatement for each suite. Such Basic Rent Abatement shall be granted to Tenant irrespective of whether Tenant occupies the Premises or not during the two month period immediately following the Effective Date. For example, if the Effective Date for Suites 150, 500, 800 and 900 is November 1, 1999, Tenant's lease on Suites 150, 500, 800 and 900 will commence November 1, 1999, and the Basic Rent described above for Suites 150, 500, 800 and 900 will commence January 1, 2000, irrespective of Tenant's occupancy.
5. ADDITIONAL RENT
Commencing upon the Effective Date, Tenant's Additional Rent (as described in Paragraph 4D of the Lease) for each of the suites leased hereunder shall be the then current rate being charged to tenants occupying the Building 1825 multiplied by the square footage of each suite and shall continue to be adjusted per the terms and conditions of Paragraph 4D.
6. AS-IS
Tenant agrees to lease each suite hereunder in an "as-is" condition, and any alteration or modification to the Premises shall be made in accordance with paragraphs 8 & 9 of the Lease at Tenant's sole cost and expense and shall not delay the commencement of Lease for each of the Suites nor delay the payment of rent.
7. PARKING
On the Effective Date, Tenant's total parking allocation shall be increased as follows:
Suite 150 |
23 spaces |
Suite 500 |
36 spaces |
Suite 800 |
56 spaces |
Suite 900 |
56 spaces |
8. BROKERS
Landlord has not been represented by any real estate broker(s) with respect to this transaction and shall not be responsible for any leasing commission in connection with the negotiation of this Eleventh Amendment of Lease. Tenant shall hold Landlord harmless from any leasing commission which may be due to a real estate broker or agent representing Tenant.
9. SIGNS
Paragraph 41 (SIGNS) of the Original Lease is hereby agreed to be deleted, and the following paragraph is substituted in its entirety:
Exhibit B-1 is a site plan of the Complex. For purposes of this paragraph the buildings shall be referred to as 1825 (Building One), 1875 (Building Two), and 1855 (Building Three). Within the perimeter outline of each of the three buildings shown on Exhibit B-1 various building surfaces have been further identified by Roman Numerals I-VI. An "east-facing sign" will mean a sign generally facing east toward highway 101, and a "west- facing" sign will mean a sign generally facing west in the direction of South Grant Street. Currently there are four building-mounted exterior lighted signs: one east facing (I) and one west facing (II) SIEBEL sign on building 3 (1855) and one east facing (III) and one west facing (IV) CROSSROADS sign on building 2 (1875). These existing signs are indicated on Exhibit B-2.
Landlord's granting Tenant additional signage is subject to obtaining certain specific approvals from the City of San Mateo, and is subject to the further conditions as hereinafter described. Any additional Tenant sign(s) must be constructed and installed at Tenant's sole cost and expense, including the cost of any applications or fees that must be paid to the City of San Mateo. All signs must be approved by Landlord and are subject to the review and must be approved by the City of San Mateo. Any additional sign(s) must use a lettering size no larger than the existing CROSSROADS signs (III & IV) on building 2 (1875). Other than the manufacturing and installation costs of any additional sign(s), Landlord shall allow Tenant's additional sign(s) at no additional cost. Landlord and Tenant shall fully cooperate with one another in obtaining the approvals from the City of San Mateo for additional signage. The Lease and this Eleventh Amendment(subject to paragraph 1 above) are not contingent upon the obtaining from the City of San Mateo the right to place any additional signage at the Complex, and the Lease and this Eleventh Amendment (subject to paragraph 1 above) shall nevertheless remain in full force and effect without diminution of rent or other offsets.
If at any time Tenant occupies less than 150,000 square feet of space in the Complex (herein defined as a Diminished Occupancy Condition), and it is determined with both parties acting in good faith that the Diminished Occupancy Condition will last more than two years, Landlord shall have the right to require Tenant to remove the additional sign(s) approved per this paragraph at Tenant's expense. If so required, or upon Lease termination, Tenant shall remove such sign(s) within 30 days of Landlord's request and Tenant shall make all required repairs to restore any damage to the Premises from Tenant's sign.
It is Landlord and Tenant's intent to obtain approval to place two additional exterior building-mounted lighted signs on Building One (1825, locations V & VI) . This shall hereinafter be referred to as plan One. In the event the City of San Mateo does not approve Plan One, Landlord and Tenant shall attempt to obtain approval to place one additional exterior building-mounted lighted sign on Building One (1825, location V) . This shall hereinafter be referred to as Plan Two. In the event the City of San Mateo does not approve any additional exterior lighted signs, then Landlord and Tenant will attempt to get approval for the sign substitution as hereinafter described. This shall hereinafter be described as Plan Three.
a. Plan One In this case Landlord and Tenant shall jointly and co-operatively apply to the City of San Mateo for approval to place two exterior building-mounted lighted signs on Building One (1825, locations V & VI). In the event the City of San Mateo approves this plan, then Landlord shall grant Tenant the right to place two exterior building- mounted lighted signs, one on Building One (1825) and one on Building Two (1875). One of Tenant's additional signs shall be east-facing (in locations V or III) and one of Tenant's additional signs shall be west-facing (in locations VI or IV). Landlord's exterior building-mounted lighted signs shall be in the reciprocal locations from Tenant's signs and shall require the relocation of one of Landlord's two existing signs. The following table outlines the alternatives:
TENANT SIGN LOCATION |
LANDLORD SIGN LOCATION |
III & VI |
V & IV |
V & IV |
III & VI |
It shall be at Tenant's preference which of the above alternatives is implemented. In addition, at such time as Tenant places Tenant's signs on Buildings One (1825) and Two (1875), Tenant agrees to remove Tenant's west-facing sign on Building Three (1855, location II) . Tenant shall pay all costs associated with this sign removal including the cost to repair any damage to the Premises and any costs to repaint the area of the building from which the sign was removed so as to render the area uniform in appearance.
b. Plan Two In the event The City of San Mateo denies approval for two additional exterior building-mounted lighted signs for Building One, then Landlord and Tenant shall apply for approval to place one additional exterior building-mounted lighted sign on Building One (1825, location V). In the event the City of San Mateo approves Plan Two, Landlord hereby grants Tenant the right to place one additional exterior-mounted lighted sign on either Building One (1825, location V) or Building Two (1875, location III) . The selection of Tenant's additional sign location shall be at Tenant's preference. In the event Tenant selects location III, Landlord, at landlord's expense, shall relocate Landlord's existing sign in location III to location V, and Tenant's additional sign shall be in location III. In the event Tenant selects location V, Landlord's sign shall remain in location III. Under this Plan Two, Tenant's existing signs on Building Three (1855, locations I and II), and Landlord's existing sign on Building Two (1875, location IV), shall remain in place.
c. Plan Three In the event the City of San Mateo denies both Plan One and Plan Two, Landlord hereby grants Tenant the right to replace Landlord's existing sign on Building Two (1875, location IV) with Tenant's sign. In this event Landlord's other sign on Building Two (1875, location III) and Tenant's signs on Building Three (1855, locations I & II) shall remain in place.
10. LEASE IN FULL FORCE AND EFFECT
Except as herein and modified the Lease shall remain in full force and effect.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have signed this Eleventh Amendment of Lease, which for reference purposes shall be deemed to have been dated as the date above written.
LANDLORD: |
TENANT: |
CROSSROADS ASSOCIATES, and |
SIEBEL SYSTEMS, Inc., a |
/s/ Boyd Smith Title Partner |
/s/ Jeffrey T. Amann Title Director, Legal Affairs |
THIRTEENTH AMENDMENT OF LEASE
This Thirteenth Amendment of Lease is made and entered into this 7th day of December, 1999, by and between Crossroads Associates and Clocktower Associates (Landlord), and Siebel Systems, Inc. a Delaware Corporation (Tenant).
RECITALS
A. WHEREAS, Landlord and Tenant entered into a Lease dated June 4th, 1996, (the Lease) for the lease of approximately 66,426 gross square feet of space located in the five story Building located at 1855 South Grant Street, San Mateo, San Mateo County, California; and
B. WHEREAS, by letter dated October 30th, 1996 Tenant exercised Tenant's option to lease the fourth floor of the Building located at 1875 South Grant Street, San Mateo, San Mateo County, California (and hereinafter referred to as the 1875 Building) and by letter dated December 17th, 1996, Tenant exercised Tenant's option to lease the tenth floor of the 1875 Building; and
C. WHEREAS, by First Amendment of Lease dated March 17, 1997 Landlord agreed to lease to Tenant and Tenant agreed to lease from Landlord 12,926 rentable square feet of space located on the first floor of the 1875 Building, commencing April 1st, 1997, contingent upon Landlord obtaining a lease termination agreement with California Federal Bank, which lease termination agreement was not obtained thereby rendering the First Amendment of Lease void; and
D. WHEREAS, by Second Amendment of Lease dated March 19, 1997 Tenant leased an additional 12,926 gross square feet of space located on the first floor of the 1875 Building; and
E. WHEREAS, by letter dated May 23, 1997, Tenant exercised Tenant's Option to lease the ninth floor of the 1875 Building, and by letter dated July 28th, 1997 Tenant exercised Tenant's Option to lease the Eighth floor of the 1875 Building, thereby bringing Tenant's total leased area (subject to the Ninth floor becoming available) to 150,160 gross square feet of space; and
F. WHEREAS, by Third Amendment of Lease dated September 1st, 1997 Landlord and Tenant agreed to an early commencement of lease for Suite 130, in the 1875 Building, such that the Suite 130 Lease commenced September 1st, 1997.
G. WHEREAS, by Fourth Amendment of Lease dated April 2nd, 1998, Landlord and Tenant agreed that Landlord will allow Tenant to make certain improvements to Tenant's Premises in the 1875 Building and Tenant further agreed to additional compensation for additional parking.
H. WHEREAS, Bay Networks exercised its option to extend its lease on the ninth floor of the 1875 Building, thereby making Tenant's exercise of option to lease the ninth floor void and therefore bringing Tenant's total leased area to 132,458 square feet.
I. WHEREAS, by Fifth Amendment of Lease dated May 8, 1998, in the 1875 Building, Tenant leased an additional 9,453 square feet on the second floor and 6,973 square feet on the third floor (which includes Tenant's proportionate share of building common areas), thereby bringing Tenant's total leased area to 148,884 square feet.
J. WHEREAS, by Sixth Amendment of Lease dated September 16, 1998, in the 1875 Building, Tenant leased an additional 7,113 square feet on the fifth floor (which includes Tenant's proportionate share of building common areas) and which space was further identified as Suite 500, thereby bringing Tenant's total leased area to 155,997 square feet.
K. WHEREAS, by Seventh Amendment of Lease dated December 1, 1998, Tenant agreed to lease Suite 500 prior to March 1, 1999 in the event it became available and Tenant's lease of Suite 500 commenced December 29, 1998.
L. WHEREAS, by Eighth Amendment of Lease dated January 15, 1999 in the 1875 Building, Tenant leased an additional 810 square feet on the second floor and 4,288 square feet on the third floor (which includes Tenant's proportionate share of building common areas), thereby bringing Tenant's total leased area to 161,095 square feet.
M. WHEREAS, by Ninth Amendment of Lease dated January 25, 1999 in the 1875 Building, Tenant leased an additional 5,221 square feet on the sixth floor and 2,695 square feet on the seventh floor (which includes Tenant's proportionate share of building common areas), thereby bringing Tenant's total leased area to 169,011 square feet.
N. WHEREAS, by Tenth Amendment of Lease dated February 25, 1999 in the 1875 Building, Tenant leased an additional 4,319 square feet on the second floor (which includes Tenant's proportionate share of building common areas), thereby bringing Tenant's total leased area to 173,330 square feet.
0. WHEREAS, by Eleventh Amendment of Lease dated April 7, 1999 in the 1825 Building, Tenant leased an additional 7,509 square feet on the first floor, 11,417 square feet on the fifth floor, 17,702 on the eighth floor and 17,702 square feet on the ninth floor (which includes Tenant's proportionate share of building common areas), thereby bringing Tenant's total leased area to 227,660 square feet.
P. WHEREAS, by Twelfth Amendment of Lease dated May 26, 1999 Landlord agreed to lease to Tenant and Tenant agreed to lease from Landlord 1,657 of rentable square feet of space located on the third floor of the 1875 Building, effective July 1st, 1999, contingent upon Landlord obtaining a lease termination agreement with PRS International, which lease termination agreement was not obtained thereby rendering the Twelfth Amendment of Lease void; and
Q. WHEREAS, in the 1875 Building, Tenant now desires to lease and additional 2,552 square feet on the second floor (which includes Tenant's proportionate share of building common areas), thereby bringing Tenant's total leased area to 230,212 square feet.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and other good and valuable consideration, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, Landlord and Tenant agree as follows:
1. The area to be leased hereunder shall hereinafter be referred to as "Suite 210" and is described as follows: 2,552 gross square feet of space, which includes Tenant's prorata share of Building common areas, located on the second floor of the Building located at 1875 South Grant Street, San Mateo, San Mateo County, California and as further outlined in red on Exhibit "A".
Tenant hereby acknowledges that Suite 210 is currently leased to Websense. Tenant's Lease of Suite 210 is contingent upon Landlord entering into, in Landlord's sole opinion, an acceptable Lease Termination Agreement with Websense. In the event Landlord does not enter into such a lease termination agreement then this Thirteenth Amendment of Lease shall be void and of no force and effect between the parties and neither Landlord nor Tenant shall be liable to one another for having entered into this Thirteenth Amendment of Lease and the Lease shall remain in full force and effect.
2. EFFECTIVE DATE
Subject to Paragraph 1 above, the Effective Date for Suite 210 shall be January 1, 2000.
3. TERM
Subject to Paragraph 1 above, commencing upon the Effective Date Landlord agrees to lease to Tenant and Tenant agrees to lease and hire from Landlord Suite 210.
The Term of Lease for Suite 210 shall terminate August 31, 2008. Landlord and Tenant each acknowledge that the expiration date of the term of Lease for Suite 210 is different from the expiration date of the term of lease for other space leased by Tenant, including the expiration date of the term of lease for the 1855 Building and the "Core Space" (as defined in Paragraph 3 of the Fifth Amendment of Lease). In the event the term of Tenant's lease for the Core Space expires and Tenant vacates the Core Space, nevertheless, the term of lease for Suite 210 leased hereunder shall expire August 31st, 2008 and all the terms and conditions of the Lease shall remain in full force and effect and shall pertain to the space leased under this Thirteenth Amendment of Lease. Furthermore, it is hereby agreed that the Lease for Suite 210 shall be subject to the Option to Extend granted to Tenant per paragraph 48 of the Lease such that in the event that Tenant exercises its option to extend the Lease on the Core Space such that the Lease for the Core Space is extended to July 31st, 2011, then the Lease for Suite 210 shall automatically be extended from August 31, 2008 to July 31st, 2011. The Basic and Additional Rent on Suite 210 for the period September 1st, 2008 to July 31st, 2011 (provided Tenant has exercised its option per paragraph 48 of the Lease) shall be at the same rate as Tenant is then paying on the Core Space. As is stated in Paragraph 48 (f), Tenant's second Option to Extend shall apply to all space then leased by Tenant as of the date of the exercise of the second option.
4. BASIC RENT
Commencing upon the Effective Date, Tenant's monthly Basic Rent for Suite 210 shall be 2,552 s.f. x $3.40 = $8,676.80 per month. This amount shall be adjusted August 8th, 2000 and annually thereafter, in the same manner and upon the same date and with the same limitations as described in Paragraph 38 of the Lease.
Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, for Suite 210, Landlord hereby grants Tenant two months Basic Rent abatement on such suite. Such Basic Rent Abatement shall be granted to Tenant irrespective whether Tenant occupies the Premises or not during the two month period immediately following the Effective Date. For example, the Effective Date for Suite 210 is January 1st, 2000, Tenant's lease on Suite 210 will commence January 1st, 2000, and the Basic Rent described above for Suite 210 will commence March 1st, 2000.
5. ADDITIONAL RENT
Commencing upon the Effective Date, Tenant's Additional Rent as described in Paragraph 4D of the Lease shall be the then current rate being charged to tenants occupying Building 1875 and shall continue to be adjusted per the terms and conditions of Paragraph 4D.
6. AS-IS
Tenant agrees to lease suite 210 hereunder in an "as- is" condition, and any alteration or modification to the Premises shall be made in accordance with paragraphs 8 & 9 of the Lease at Tenant's sole cost and expense and shall not delay the commencement of Lease for Suite 210 nor delay the payment of rent.
7. PARKING
Upon the Effective Date for Suite 210, Tenant's total parking allocation shall be increased by 8 spaces.
8. NO BROKERS
Landlord and Tenant mutually acknowledge that neither Landlord nor Tenant have had any dealings with any real estate brokers or agents in connection with the negotiation of this Thirteenth Amendment of Lease which has resulted in any obligation to pay a leasing commission.
9. LEASE IN FULL FORCE AND EFFECT
Except as herein and modified the Lease shall remain in full force and effect.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have signed this Thirteenth Amendment of Lease, which for reference purposes shall be deemed to have been dated as the date above written.
LANDLORD: |
TENANT: |
CROSSROADS ASSOCIATES |
SIEBEL SYSTEMS, Inc., a |
/s/ Boyd Smith Title Partner |
/s/ Jeffrey T. Amann Title Director, Legal Affairs |
CLOCKTOWER ASSOCIATES
/s/ Boyd Smith
Title Partner
FOURTEENTH AMENDNENT OF LEASE
This Fourteenth Amendment of Lease is made and entered into this 17th day of December, 1999, by and between Crossroads Associates and Clocktower Associates (Landlord), and Siebel Systems, Inc. a Delaware Corporation (Tenant).
RECITALS
A. WHEREAS, Landlord and Tenant entered into a Lease dated June 4th, 1996, (the Lease) for the lease of approximately 66,426 gross square feet of space located in the five story Building located at 1855 South Grant Street, San Mateo, San Mateo County, California; and
B. WHEREAS, by letter dated October 30th, 1996 Tenant exercised Tenant's option to lease the fourth floor of the Building located at 1875 South Grant Street, San Mateo, San Mateo County, California (and hereinafter referred to as the 1875 Building) and by letter dated December 17th, 1996, Tenant exercised Tenant's option to lease the tenth floor of the 1875 Building; and
C. WHEREAS, by First Amendment of Lease dated March 17, 1997 Landlord agreed to lease to Tenant and Tenant agreed to lease from Landlord 12,926 rentable square feet of space located on the first floor of the 1875 Building, commencing April 1st, 1997, contingent upon Landlord obtaining a lease termination agreement with California Federal Bank, which lease termination agreement was not obtained thereby rendering the First Amendment of Lease void; and
D. WHEREAS, by Second Amendment of Lease dated March 19, 1997 Tenant leased an additional 12,926 gross square feet of space located on the first floor of the 1875 Building; and
E. WHEREAS, by letter dated May 23, 1997, Tenant exercised Tenant's Option to lease the ninth floor of the 1875 Building, and by letter dated July 28th, 1997 Tenant exercised Tenant's Option to lease the Eighth floor of the 1875 Building, thereby bringing Tenant's total leased area (subject to the Ninth floor becoming available) to 150,160 gross square feet of space; and
F. WHEREAS, by Third Amendment of Lease dated September 1st, 1997 Landlord and Tenant agreed to an early commencement of lease for Suite 130, in the 1875 Building, such that the Suite 130 Lease commenced September 1st, 1997; and
G. WHEREAS, by Fourth Amendment of Lease dated April 2nd, 1998, Landlord and Tenant agreed that Landlord will allow Tenant to make certain improvements to Tenant's Premises in the 1875 Building and Tenant further agreed to additional compensation for additional parking; and
H. WHEREAS, Bay Networks exercised its option to extend its lease on the ninth floor of the 1875 Building, thereby making Tenant's exercise of option to lease the ninth floor void and therefore bringing Tenant's total leased area to 132,458 square feet; and
I. WHEREAS, by Fifth Amendment of Lease dated May 8, 1998, in the 1875 Building, Tenant leased an additional 9,453 square feet on the second floor and 6,973 square feet on the third floor (which includes Tenant's proportionate share of building common areas), thereby bringing Tenant's total leased area to 148,884 square feet; and
J. WHEREAS, by Sixth Amendment of Lease dated September 16, 1998, in the 1875 Building, Tenant leased an additional 7,113 square feet on the fifth floor (which includes Tenant's proportionate share of building common areas) and which space was further identified as Suite 500, thereby bringing Tenant's total leased area to 155,997 square feet; and
K. WHEREAS, by Seventh Amendment of Lease dated December 1, 1998, Tenant agreed to lease Suite 500 prior to March 1, 1999 in the event it became available and Tenant's lease of Suite 500 commenced December 29, 1998; and
L. WHEREAS, by Eighth Amendment of Lease dated January 15, 1999 in the 1875 Building, Tenant leased an additional 810 square feet on the second floor and 4,288 square feet on the third floor (which includes Tenant's proportionate share of building common areas), thereby bringing Tenant's total leased area to 161,095 square feet; and
M. WHEREAS, by Ninth Amendment of Lease dated January 25, 1999 in the 1875 Building, Tenant leased an additional 5,221 square feet on the sixth floor and 2,695 square feet on the seventh floor (which includes Tenant's proportionate share of building common areas), thereby bringing Tenant's total leased area to 169,011 square feet; and
N. WHEREAS, by Tenth Amendment of Lease dated February 25, 1999 in the 1875 Building, Tenant leased an additional 4,319 square feet on the second floor (which includes Tenant's proportionate share of building common areas), thereby bringing Tenant's total leased area to 173,330 square feet; and
O. WHEREAS, by Eleventh Amendment of Lease dated April 7, 1999 in the 1825 Building, Tenant leased an additional 7,509 square feet on the first floor, 11,417 square feet on the fifth floor, 17,702 on the eighth floor and 17,702 square feet on the ninth floor (which includes Tenant's proportionate share of building common areas), thereby bringing Tenant's total leased area to 227,660 square feet; and
P. WHEREAS, by Twelfth Amendment of Lease dated May 26, 1999 Landlord agreed to lease to Tenant and Tenant agreed to lease from Landlord 1,657 of rentable square feet of space located on the third floor of the 1875 Building, effective July 1st, 1999, contingent upon Landlord obtaining a lease termination agreement with PRS International, which lease termination agreement was not obtained thereby rendering the Twelfth Amendment of Lease void; and
Q. WHEREAS, by Thirteenth Amendment of Lease dated December 7, 1999, Tenant leased an additional 2,552 square feet on the second floor (which includes Tenant's proportionate share of building common areas) of the 1875 Building, thereby bringing Tenant's total leased area to 230,212 square feet; and
R. WHEREAS, in the 1875 Building, Tenant now desires to lease an additional 1,608 square feet on the fifth floor (which includes Tenant's proportionate share of building common areas), thereby bringing Tenant's total leased area to 231,820 square feet.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and other good and valuable consideration, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, Landlord and Tenant agree as follows:
1. The area to be leased hereunder shall hereinafter be referred to as "Suite 540" and is described as follows: 1,608 rentable square feet of space, which includes Tenant's prorata share of Building common areas, located on the fifth floor of the Building located at 1875 South Grant Street, San Mateo, San Mateo County, California and as further outlined in red on Exhibit "A".
2. EFFECTIVE DATE
The "Effective Date" for the commencement of Lease for Suite 540 shall hereinafter be defined as April 1, 2000.
3. TERM
The term of Lease for Suite 540 shall commence upon the Effective Date and shall terminate August 31st, 2008. Landlord and Tenant each acknowledge that the expiration date of the term of Lease for Suite 540 is different from the expiration date of the term of lease for the 1855 Building and The "Core Space" (as defined in Paragraph 3 of the Fifth Amendment of Lease). In the event the term of Tenant's lease for the Core Space expires and Tenant vacates the Core Space, nevertheless,
the term of lease for Suite 540 leased hereunder shall expire August 31st, 2008 and all the terms and conditions of the Lease shall remain in full force and effect and shall pertain to the space leased under this Fourteenth Amendment of Lease. Furthermore, it is hereby agreed that the Lease for Suite 540 shall be subject to the Option to Extend granted to Tenant per paragraph 48 of the Lease. In the event that Tenant exercises its option to extend the Lease on the Core Space such that the Lease for the Core Space is extended to July 31st, 2011, then the Lease for Suite 540 shall automatically be extended from August 31st, 2008 to July 31st, 2011. The Basic and Additional Rent on Suite 540 for the period September 1st, 2008 to July 31st, 2011 (provided Tenant has exercised its option per paragraph 48 of the Lease) shall be at the same rate as Tenant is then paying on the Core Space. As is stated in Paragraph 48 (f), Tenant's second Option to Extend shall apply to all space then leased by Tenant as of the date of the exercise of the second option.
4. BASIC RENT
Commencing upon the Effective Date, Tenant's monthly Basic Rent for Suite 540 shall be 1,608 s.f. x $3.40 = $5,467.20 per month. This amount shall be adjusted August 8th, 2000 and annually thereafter, in the same manner and upon the same date and with the same limitations as described in Paragraph 38 of the Lease.
Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, for Suite 540, Landlord hereby grants Tenant two months Basic Rent abatement on such suite. Such Basic Rent Abatement shall be granted to Tenant irrespective whether Tenant occupies the Premises or not during the two month period immediately following the Effective Date. For example, the Effective Date for Suite 540 is April 1st, 2000, Tenant's lease on Suite 540 will commence April 1st, 2000, and the Basic Rent described above for Suite 540 will commence June 1st, 2000.
5. ADDITIONAL RENT
Commencing upon the Effective Date, Tenant's Additional Rent as described in Paragraph 4D of the Lease shall be the then current rate being charged to tenants occupying Building 1875 and shall continue to be adjusted per the terms and conditions of Paragraph 4D.
6. AS-IS
Tenant agrees to lease suite 540 hereunder in an "as-is" condition, and any alteration or modification to the Premises shall be made in accordance with paragraphs 8 & 9 of the Lease at Tenant's sole cost and expense and shall not delay the commencement of Lease for Suite 540 nor delay the payment of rent.
7. PARKING
Upon the Effective Date for Suite 540, Tenant's total parking allocation shall be increased by 5 spaces.
8. NO BROKERS
Landlord and Tenant mutually acknowledge that neither Landlord nor Tenant have had any dealings with any real estate brokers or agents in connection with the negotiation of this Fourteenth Amendment of Lease which has resulted in any obligation to pay a leasing commission.
9. LEASE IN FULL FORCE AND EFFECT
Except as herein and modified the Lease shall remain in full force and effect.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have signed this Fourteenth Amendment of tease, which for reference purposes shall be deemed to have been dated as the date above written.
LANDLORD: |
TENANT: |
CROSSROADS ASSOCIATES |
SIEBEL SYSTEMS, Inc., a |
/s/ Dick Jacobson Title Partner |
/s/ Jeffrey T. Amann Title Director, Legal Affairs |
CLOCKTOWER ASSOCIATES
/s/ Dick Jacobson
Title Partner
FIFTEENTH AMENDMENT OF LEASE
This Fifteenth Amendment of Lease is made and entered into this 12th day of January, 2000, by and between Crossroads Associates and Clocktower Associates (Landlord), and Siebel Systems, Inc. a Delaware Corporation (Tenant).
RECITALS
A. WHEREAS, Landlord and Tenant entered into a Lease dated June 4th, 1996, (the Lease) for the lease of approximately 66,426 gross square feet of space located in the five story Building located at 1855 South Grant Street, San Mateo, San Mateo County, California; and
B. WHEREAS, by letter dated October 30th, 1996 Tenant exercised Tenant's option to lease the fourth floor of the Building located at 1815 South Grant Street, San Mateo, San Mateo County, California (and hereinafter referred to as the 1875 Building) and by letter dated December 17th, 1996, Tenant exercised Tenant's option to lease the tenth floor of the 1875 Building; and
C. WHEREAS, by First Amendment of Lease dated March 17, 1997 Landlord agreed to lease to Tenant and Tenant agreed to lease from Landlord 12,926 rentable square feet of space located on the first floor of the 1875 Building, commencing April 1st, 1997, contingent upon Landlord obtaining a lease termination agreement with California Federal Bank, which lease termination agreement was not obtained thereby rendering the First Amendment of Lease void; and
D. WHEREAS, by Second Amendment of Lease dated March 19, 1997 Tenant leased an additional 12,926 gross square feet of space located on the first floor of the 1875 Building; and
E. WHEREAS, by letter dated May 23, 1997, Tenant exercised Tenant's Option to lease the ninth floor of the 1875 Building, and by letter dated July 28th, 1997 Tenant exercised Tenant's Option to lease the Eighth floor of the 1875 Building, thereby bringing Tenant's total leased area (subject to the Ninth floor becoming available) to 150,160 gross square feet of space; and
F. WHEREAS, by Third Amendment of Lease dated September 1st, 1997 Landlord and Tenant agreed to an early commencement of lease for Suite 130, in the 1875 Building, such that the Suite 130 Lease commenced September 1st, 1997; and
G. WHEREAS, by Fourth Amendment of Lease dated April 2nd, 1998, Landlord and Tenant agreed that Landlord will allow Tenant to make certain improvements to Tenant's Premises in the 1875 Building and Tenant further agreed to additional compensation for additional parking; and
H. WHEREAS, Bay Networks exercised its option to extend its lease on the ninth floor of the 1875 Building, thereby making Tenant's exercise of option to lease the ninth floor void and therefore bringing Tenant's total leased area to 132,458 square feet; and
I. WHEREAS, by Fifth Amendment of Lease dated May 8, 1998, in the 1875 Building, Tenant leased an additional 9,453 square feet on the second floor and 6,973 square feet on the third floor (which includes Tenant's proportionate share of building common areas), thereby bringing Tenant's total leased area to 148,884 square feet; and
J. WHEREAS, by Sixth Amendment of Lease dated September 16, 1998, in the 1875 Building, Tenant leased an additional 7,113 square feet on the fifth floor (which includes Tenant's proportionate share of building common areas) and which space was further identified as Suite 500, thereby bringing Tenant's total leased area to 155,997 square feet; and
K. WHEREAS, by Seventh Amendment of Lease dated December 1, 1998, Tenant agreed to lease Suite 500 prior to March 1, 1999 in the event it became available and Tenant's lease of Suite 500 commenced December 29, 1998; and
L. WHEREAS, by Eighth Amendment of Lease dated January 15, 1999 in the 1875 Building, Tenant leased an additional 810 square feet on the second floor and 4,288 square feet on the third floor (which includes Tenant's proportionate share of building common areas), thereby bringing Tenant's total leased area to 161,095 square feet; and
M. WHEREAS, by Ninth Amendment of Lease dated January 25, 1999 in the 1875 Building, Tenant leased an additional 5,221 square feet on the sixth floor and 2,695 square feet on the seventh floor (which includes Tenant's proportionate share of building common areas), thereby bringing Tenant's total leased area to 169,011 square feet; and
N. WHEREAS, by Tenth Amendment of Lease dated February 25, 1999 in the 1875 Building, Tenant leased an additional 4,319 square feet on the second floor (which includes Tenant's proportionate share of building common areas), thereby bringing Tenant's total leased area to 173,330 square feet and
O. WHEREAS, by Eleventh Amendment of Lease dated April 7,1999 in the 1825 Building, Tenant leased an additional 7,509 square feet on the first floor, 11,417 square feet on the fifth floor, 17,702 on the eighth floor and 17,702 square feet on the ninth floor (which includes Tenant's proportionate share of building common areas), thereby bringing Tenant's total leased area to 227,660 square feet; and
P. WHEREAS, by Twelfth Amendment of Lease dated May 26, 1999 Landlord agreed to lease to Tenant and Tenant agreed to lease from Landlord 1,657 of rentable square feet of space located on the third floor of the 1875 Building, effective July 1st, 1999, contingent upon Landlord obtaining a lease termination agreement with PRS International, which lease termination agreement was not obtained thereby rendering the Twelfth Amendment of Lease void; and
Q. WHEREAS, by Thirteenth Amendment of Lease dated December 7, 1999, Tenant leased an additional 2,552 square feet on the second floor (which includes Tenant's proportionate share of building common areas) of the 1875 Building, thereby bringing Tenant's total leased area to 230,212 square feet; and
R. WHEREAS, by the still to be executed Fourteenth Amendment of Lease dated December 7, 1999, Tenant intends to lease an additional 1,608 square feet on the fifth floor (which includes Tenant's proportionate share of building common areas) of the 1875 Building, which upon execution of the Fourteenth Amendment of Lease shall thereby bringing Tenant's total leased area to 231,820 square feet; and
S. WHEREAS, in the 1875 Building, Tenant now desires to lease an additional 1,657 square feet on the third floor (which includes Tenant's proportionate share of building common areas), thereby bringing Tenant's total leased area to 233,477 square feet.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and other good and valuable consideration, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, Landlord and Tenant agree as follows:
1. The areas to be leased hereunder are all located in the Building located at 1875 South Grant Street, San Mateo, San Mateo County, California and are further described as follows:
a) Suite 31D-D,E (PRS International)
Comprising 1,027 gross square feet of space, including Tenant's prorata share of Building common areas, located on the third floor and as further described in red on Exhibit "Al".
b) Suite 310-C (Bowman Capital Management)
Comprising 630 gross square feet of space, which includes Tenant's prorata share of Building common areas, located on the third floor and as further outlined in red on Exhibit "A2".
Tenant hereby acknowledges that the two suites to be leased hereunder, Suites 310-D,E and 310-C are currently leased to PRS International, Inc. and Bowman Capital Management respectively. Tenant's Lease of Suite 310-D,E is contingent upon Landlord entering into, in Landlord's sole opinion, an acceptable lease termination agreement with PRS International for the referenced suite. In the event Landlord and PRS International do not enter into such a lease termination agreement, then the provisions of this Fifteenth Amendment of Lease shall be void and of no force and effect between the parties, neither Landlord nor Tenant shall be liable to one another for having entered into this Fifteenth Amendment of Lease, and all other terms and conditions of the Lease shall remain in full force and effect. Landlord's Lease Agreement with Bowman Capital Management is on a month-to-month basis, and at such time that both an acceptable lease termination agreement is executed by PRS International, and Landlord has received a fully executed copy of this Fifteenth Amendment of Lease, Landlord will provide written notification to Bowman Capital, terminating their lease on February 29, 2000.
2. EFFECTIVE DATE
Subject to Paragraph 1 above, the Effective Dates shall be as follows:
(a) Suite 310-D,E - March 1, 2000
(b) Suite 310-C - March 1, 2000
3. TERM
Subject to Paragraph 1 above, commencing upon the respective Effective Dates Landlord agrees to lease to Tenant and Tenant agrees to lease and hire from Landlord Suites 310-D,E and 310-C. The Term of Lease for Suites 310-D,E and 310-C shall terminate August 31, 2008. Landlord and Tenant each acknowledge that the expiration date of the term of Lease for Suites 3l0-D,E and 310-C is different from the expiration date of the term of lease for other space leased by Tenant, including the expiration date of the term of lease for the 1855 Building and the "Core Space" (as defined in Paragraph 3 of the Fifth Amendment of Lease). In the event the term of Tenant's lease for the Core Space expires and Tenant vacates the Core Space, nevertheless, the term of lease for Suites 310-D,E and 310-C leased hereunder shall expire August 31st, 2008 and all the terms and conditions of the Lease shall remain in full force and effect and shall pertain to the space leased under this Fifteenth Amendment of Lease. Furthermore, it is hereby agreed that the Lease for Suites 3l0-D,E and 310-C shall be subject to the Option to Extend granted to Tenant per paragraph 48 of the Lease such that in the event that Tenant exercises its option to extend the Lease on the Core Space such that the Lease for the Core Space is extended to July 31st, 2011, then the Lease for Suites 310-D,E and 310-C shall automatically be extended from August 31, 2008 to July 31st, 2011. The Basic and Additional Rent on Suites 310-D,E and 310-C for the period September 1st, 2008 to July 31st, 2011 (provided Tenant has exercised its option per paragraph 48 of the Lease) shall be at the same rate as Tenant is then paying on the Core Space. As is stated in Paragraph 48(f), Tenant's second Option to Extend shall apply to all space then leased by Tenant as of the date of the exercise of the second option.
4. BASIC RENT
The Basic Rent for the additional space leased per this Fifteenth Amendment, commencing upon the Effective Date, shall be $3.40 per square foot per month multiplied by the square footage leased, as follows:
Suite |
Square Footage |
Basic Rent/Sq. Ft. |
Total monthly |
310-D,E |
1,027 |
$3.40 |
$3,491.80 |
The Basic Rent described above shall be adjusted August 8th, 2000 and annually thereafter, in the same manner and upon the same date and with the same limitations as described in paragraph 38 of the Lease.
Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, for Suites 310-D,E and 310-C, Landlord hereby grants Tenant two months Basic Rent abatement for each suite. Such Basic Rent Abatement shall be granted to Tenant irrespective of whether Tenant occupies the Premises or not during the two-month period immediately following the Effective Date. For example, if the Effective Date for Suites 310-D,E and 310-C is March 1, 2000, Tenant's lease on Suites 310-D,E and 310-C will commence March 1, 2000, and the Basic Rent described above for Suites 310-D,E and 310-C will commence May 1, 2000, irrespective of Tenant's occupancy.
5. ADDITIONAL RENT
Commencing upon the Effective Date, Tenants Additional Rent for each suite, as described in Paragraph 4D of the Lease, shall be the then current rate per square foot per month being charged to tenants occupying Building 1875 multiplied by the respective square footages and shall continue to be adjusted per the terms and conditions of Paragraph 4D.
6. AS-IS
Tenant agrees to lease each suite hereunder in an "as-is" condition, and any alteration or modification to the Premises shall be made in accordance with paragraphs 8 & 9 of the Lease at Tenant's sole cost and expense and shall not delay the commencement of Lease for each of the Suites nor delay the payment of rent.
7. PARKING
On the Effective Date, Tenant's total parking allocation shall be increased as follows:
Suite 310-D,E |
3 spaces | |
Suite 310-C |
2 spaces |
8. NO BROKERS
Landlord and Tenant mutually acknowledge that neither Landlord nor Tenant have had any dealings with any real estate brokers or agents in connection with the negotiation of this Fifteenth Amendment of Lease which has resulted in any obligation to pay a leasing commission.
10. LEASE IN FULL FORCE AND EFFECT
Except as herein and modified the Lease shall remain in full force and effect.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have signed this Fifteen Amendment of Lease, which for reference purposes shall be deemed to have been dated as the date above written.
LANDLORD: |
TENANT: |
CROSSROADS ASSOCIATES |
SIEBEL SYSTEMS, Inc., a |
/s/ Dick Jacobson Title Partner |
/s/ Jeffrey T. Amann Title Director, Legal Affairs |
CLOCKTOWER ASSOCIATES
/s/ Dick Jacobson
Title Partner
SIXTEENTH AMENDMENT OF LEASE
This Sixteenth Amendment of Lease is made and entered into this 12th day of September, 2000, by and between Crossroads Associates and Clocktower Associates (Landlord), and Siebel Systems, Inc. a Delaware Corporation (Tenant).
RECITALS
A. WHEREAS, Landlord and Tenant entered into a Lease dated June 4th, 1996, (the Lease) for the lease of approximately 66,426 gross square feet of space located in the five story Building located at 1855 South Grant Street, San Mateo, San Mateo County, California; and
B. WHEREAS, by letter dated October 30th, 1996 Tenant exercised Tenant's option to lease the fourth floor of the Building located at 1875 South Grant Street, San Mateo, San Mateo County, California (and hereinafter referred to as the 1875 Building) and by letter dated December 17th, 1996, Tenant exercised Tenant's option to lease the tenth floor of the 1875 Building; and
C. WHEREAS, by First Amendment of Lease dated March 17, 1997 Landlord agreed to lease to Tenant and Tenant agreed to lease from Landlord 12,926 rentable square feet of space located on the first floor of the 1875 Building, commencing April 1st, 1997, contingent upon Landlord obtaining a lease termination agreement with California Federal Bank, which lease termination agreement was not obtained thereby rendering the First Amendment of Lease void; and
D. WHEREAS, by Second Amendment of Lease dated March 19, 1997 Tenant leased an additional 12,926 gross square feet of space located on the first floor of the 1875 Building; and
E. WHEREAS, by letter dated May 23, 1997, Tenant exercised Tenant's Option to lease the ninth floor of the 1875 Building, and by letter dated July 28th, 1997 Tenant exercised Tenant's Option to lease the Eighth floor of the 1875 Building, thereby bringing Tenant's total leased area (subject to the Ninth floor becoming available) to 150,160 gross square feet of space; and
F. WHEREAS, by Third Amendment of Lease dated September 1st, 1997 Landlord and Tenant agreed to an early commencement of lease for Suite 130, in the 1875 Building, such that the Suite 130 Lease commenced September 1st, 1997; and
G. WHEREAS, by Fourth Amendment of Lease dated April 2nd, 1998, Landlord and Tenant agreed that Landlord will allow Tenant to make certain improvements to Tenant's Premises in the 1875 Building and Tenant further agreed to additional compensation for additional parking; and
H. WHEREAS, Bay Networks exercised its option to extend its lease on the ninth floor of the 1875 Building, thereby making Tenant's exercise of option to lease the ninth floor void and therefore bringing Tenant's total leased area to 132,458 square feet; and
I. WHEREAS, by Fifth Amendment of Lease dated May 8, 1998, in the 1875 Building, Tenant leased an additional 9,453 square feet on the second floor and 6,973 square feet on the third floor (which includes Tenant's proportionate share of building common areas), thereby bringing Tenant's total leased area to 148,884 square feet; and
J. WHEREAS, by Sixth Amendment of Lease dated September 16, 1998, in the 1875 Building, Tenant leased an additional 7,113 square feet on the fifth floor (which includes Tenant's proportionate share of building common areas) and which space was further identified as Suite 500, thereby bringing Tenant's total leased area to 155,997 square feet; and
K. WHEREAS, by Seventh Amendment of Lease dated December 1, 1998, Tenant agreed to lease Suite 500 prior to March 1, 1999 in the event it became available and Tenant's lease of Suite 500 commenced December 29, 1998; and
L. WHEREAS, by Eighth Amendment of Lease dated January 15, 1999 in the 1875 Building, Tenant leased an additional 810 square feet on the second floor and 4,288 square feet on the third floor (which includes Tenant's proportionate share of building common areas), thereby bringing Tenant's total leased area to 161,095 square feet; and
M. WHEREAS, by Ninth Amendment of Lease dated January 25, 1999 in the 1875 Building, Tenant leased an additional 5,221 square feet on the sixth floor and 2,695 square feet on the seventh floor (which includes Tenant's proportionate share of building common areas), thereby bringing Tenant's total leased area to 169,011 square feet; and
N. WHEREAS, by Tenth Amendment of Lease dated February 25, 1999 in the 1875 Building, Tenant leased an additional 4,319 square feet on the second floor (which includes Tenant's proportionate share of building common areas), thereby bringing Tenant's total leased area to 173,330 square feet; and
O. WHEREAS, by Eleventh Amendment of Lease dated April 7, 1999 in the 1825 Building, Tenant leased an additional 7,509 square feet on the first floor, 11,417 square feet on the fifth floor, 17,702 on the eighth floor and 17,702 square feet on the ninth floor (which includes Tenant's proportionate share of building common areas), thereby bringing Tenant's total leased area to 227,660 square feet; and
P. WHEREAS, by Twelfth Amendment of Lease dated May 26, 1999 Landlord agreed to lease to Tenant and Tenant agreed to lease from Landlord 1,657 of rentable square feet of space located on the third floor of the 1875 Building, effective July 1st, 1999, contingent upon Landlord obtaining a lease termination agreement with PRS International, which lease termination agreement was not obtained thereby rendering the Twelfth Amendment of Lease void; and
Q. WHEREAS, by Thirteenth Amendment of Lease dated December 7, 1999, Tenant leased an additional 2,552 square feet on the second floor (which includes Tenant's proportionate share of building common areas) of the 1875 Building, thereby bringing Tenant's total leased area to 230,212 square feet; and
R. WHEREAS, by Fourteenth Amendment of Lease dated December 7, 1999, Tenant leased an additional 1,608 square feet on the fifth floor (which includes Tenant's proportionate share of building common areas) of the 1875 Building, thereby bringing Tenant's total leased area to 231,820 square feet; and
S. WHEREAS, by Fifteenth Amendment of Lease dated January 12, 2000, Tenant leased an additional 1,657 square feet on the third floor (which includes Tenant's proportionate share of building common areas) of the 1875 Building, thereby bringing Tenant's total leased area to 233,477 square feet; and
T. WHEREAS, in the 1825 Building, Tenant now desires to lease an additional 2,128 square feet on the second floor (which includes Tenant's proportionate share of building common areas), thereby bringing Tenant's total leased area to 235,605 square feet.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and other good and valuable consideration, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, Landlord and Tenant agree as follows:
1. The area to be leased hereunder shall hereinafter be referred to as "Suite 280" and is described as follows: 2,128 rentable square feet of space, which includes Tenant's prorate share of Building common areas, located on the second floor of the Building located at 1825 South Grant Street, San Mateo, San Mateo County, California and as further outlined in red on Exhibit "A".
2. EFFECTIVE DATE
The "Effective Date" for the commencement of Lease for Suite 280 shall hereinafter be defined as October 15, 2000.
3. TERM
The Term of Lease for Suite 280 shall commence upon the Effective Date and shall terminate April 30, 2005.
4. BASIC RENT
Commencing upon the Effective Date, Tenant's monthly Basic Rent for Suite 280 shall be 2,128 s.f. x $7.00 = $14,896.00 per month. This amount shall be adjusted August 8th, 2001 and annually thereafter, in the same manner and upon the same date and with the same limitations as described in Paragraph 38 of the Lease.
Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, for Suite 280, Landlord hereby grants Tenant a Basic Rent abatement in the amount of $22,700.00 (the cost for building standard carpet, base, painting, ceiling tiles and light fixtures). Irrespective of whether Tenant occupies the Premises, such Basic Rent Abatement shall be granted to Tenant commencing upon the Effective Date.
5. ADDITIONAL RENT
Commencing upon the Effective Date, Tenant's Additional Rent for Suite 280 as described in Paragraph 40 of the Lease shall be $1447.04 per month (2128 sq.ft. x $.68 = $1447.04) and shall continue to be adjusted per the terms and conditions of Paragraph 40.
6. AS-IS
Tenant agrees to lease suite 280 hereunder in an "as-is" condition, and any alteration or modification to the Premises shall be made in accordance with paragraphs 8 & 9 of the Lease at Tenant's sole cost and expense (excepting that Landlord shall grant the Basic Rent Abatement in the amount of $22,700 as described in paragraph 4 above) and shall not delay the commencement of Lease for Suite 280 nor delay the payment of rent.
7. PARKING
Upon the Effective Date for Suite 280, Tenant's total parking allocation shell be increased by 6 spaces.
8. NO BROKERS
Tenant acknowledges that Tenant shall pay all commissions due real estate brokers or agents representing Tenant in connection with the negotiation of this Sixteenth Amendment of Lease, and Landlord shall not be obligated to pay any commissions to Tenant's brokers or agents.
9. LEASE IN FULL FORCE AND EFFECT
Except as herein and modified the Lease shall remain in full force and effect.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have signed this Sixteenth Amendment of Lease, which for reference purposes shall be deemed to have been dated as the date above written.
LANDLORD: |
TENANT: |
CROSSROADS ASSOCIATES |
SIEBEL SYSTEMS, Inc., a |
/s/ Dick Jacobson Title Partner |
/s/ Jeffrey T. Amann Title Senior Director, Legal Affairs |
CLOCKTOWER ASSOCIATES
/s/ Dick Jacobson
Title Partner
Exhibit 10.9.1
AMENDMENT NUMBER ONE TO LEASE
THIS AMENDMENT NUMBER ONE TO LEASE (this "Amendment Number One") is made this 26th day of October, 2000, between MV Golden State Emeryville, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, ("Landlord"), and Siebel Systems, Inc., a Delaware corporation ("Tenant").
WHEREAS, Spieker Properties, L.P., a California limited partnership ("Spieker") and Tenant entered into a Lease dated August 16, 1999, (the "Lease"), for those certain premises located at 2100 Powell Street, Emeryville, California (the "Premises"), as more fully described in the Lease. Capitalized terms used but not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings given them in the Lease; and
WHEREAS, in connection with a separate transaction, Spieker, as ground lessor, entered into a certain ground lease (the "Ground Lease") with Landlord, as ground lessee, covering the Building; and
WHEREAS, in connection with the Ground Lease, Spieker assigned its rights and obligations under the Lease to Landlord; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Paragraph 39.C of the Lease, Tenant has exercised its one-time Option to Expand; and
WHEREAS, Landlord and Tenant desire to modify the Lease as provided herein.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the covenants and agreements contained herein, the parties hereby mutually agree as follows:
1. Premises.
(a) The term "Premises" as used in the Lease is amended to be the original premises described in the Lease (the "Original Premises") and the entire ninth (9th) through twelfth (12th)
(b) The "Building Description" as provided in the Basic Lease Information of the Lease is amended deleted in it entirety and replaced with the following:
"2100 Powell Street, Emeryville, California, comprised of one 16-story office building with approximately Three Hundred Forty-Four Thousand Four Hundred Thirty-Three (344,433) rentable square feet, subject to adjustment pursuant to Paragraph 39.I hereof"
(c) Subject to Paragraph 35 of the Lease, Landlord shall use commercially reasonable efforts to cause the Base Building Work (described in Schedule 1 to Exhibit C of the Lease, as modified hereby) to be substantially complete and to deliver possession of the Expansion Premises to Tenant on or about January 15, 2001. Tenant's taking of possession of the Expansion Premises or any part thereof shall constitute Tenant's confirmation of substantial completion for all purposes hereof, whether or not substantial completion of the Building or Project shall have occurred.
2. Rent. Base Rent for the Expansion Premises and the Original Premises, collectively, shall be as follows:
Month: |
Base Rent (subject to adjustment in accordance with Paragraph 39.I): |
Month 1 through Month 12: |
$919,636.11 per month, based upon $2.67 per rentable square foot |
Month 13 through Month 24: |
$936,857.76 per month, based upon $2.72 per rentable square foot |
Month 25 through Month 36: |
$954,079.41 per month, based upon $2.77 per rentable square foot |
Month 37 through Month 48: |
$971,301.06 per month, based upon $2.82 per rentable square foot |
Month 49 through Month 60: |
$988,522.71 per month, based upon $2.87 per rentable square foot |
Month 61 through Month 72: |
$1,009,188.69 per month, based upon $2.93 per rentable square foot |
Month 73 through Month 84: |
$1,026,410.34 per month, based upon $2.98 per rentable square foot |
Month 85 through Month 96: |
$1,047,076.32 per month, based upon $3.04 per rentable square foot |
Month 97 through Month 108: |
$1,067,742.32 per month, based upon $3.10 per rentable square foot |
Month 109 through Month 120: |
$1,088,408.28 per month, based upon $3.16 per rentable square foot |
Month 121 through Month 132: |
$1,109,074.26 per month, based upon $3.22 per rentable square foot |
Month 133 through Month 144: |
$1,129,740.24 per month, based upon $3.28 per rentable square foot |
3. Security Deposit.
(a) The definition of "Security Deposit" in Basic Lease Information is deleted and replaced with the following: "$1,000,000 Letter of Credit (subject to adjustment as provided in Paragraph 39.H and Paragraph 19 hereof)".
(b) Subparagraphs 39.H.6 and 39.H.7 shall be deleted in their entirety and replaced with the following:
"6. Increase of Letter of Credit Amount. If Tenant's financial condition satisfies the Minimum Standards (defined herein) at any time during the Term of this Lease, and if Tenant is not in material default beyond any applicable cure period under the terms and conditions of the Lease, Tenant shall maintain the LOC in the LOC Amount described in the Basic Lease Information. Within ten (10) business days of either the delivery of notice from Landlord that Tenant has failed to satisfy the Minimum Standards or if Tenant's Determination (as defined below) indicates the same, or if Tenant is in material default of the Lease beyond any applicable cure period, Tenant shall increase the LOC Amount to Four Million Six Hundred Thousand Dollars ($4,600,000.00) (the "Increased LOC Amount"). For purposes of this Lease, "Minimum Standards" shall mean (a) Tenant's Tangible Net Worth (as defined below) exceeds Seven Hundred Fifty Million Dollars ($750,000,000.00); and (b) Tenant maintains a Financial Current Ratio in excess of two (2). Tenant shall in good faith, and no less than one time quarterly, regularly monitor, review and report in writing to Landlord its financial status to determine if it meets the Minimum Standards ("Tenant's Determination"); provided, however, that during any quarter in which Tenant is a "publicly traded company" registered under the Securities Act of 1933, then Tenant shall not be required to provide written reports to Landlord. In the event that Tenant fails to satisfy the Minimum Standards, Tenant shall immediately (i) notify Landlord, and (ii) within ten (10) business days following written notice from Landlord or the date of Tenant's Determination, deliver to Landlord an LOC in an amount equal to the Increased LOC Amount and which is otherwise in compliance with the terms and conditions of this Lease. "Tangible Net Worth" shall mean assets less intangible assets and total liabilities, with intangible assets including nonmaterial benefits such as goodwill, patents, copyrights, and trademarks. "Financial Current Ratio" shall mean total current assets divided by total current liabilities as shown on the balance sheet, all as determined by Tenant's financial statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and audited by the nationally recognized public accounting firm which customarily audits Tenant's financial statements. In the event that pursuant to the terms of this Paragraph 39.H, Tenant is required to provide to Landlord confidential, nonpublic information, Tenant shall indicate in writing that such information is confidential and Landlord and Tenant shall each timely execute a commercially reasonable confidentiality agreement covering such information.
7. Reduction of Letter of Credit. Only in the event Tenant satisfies all of the following conditions, the Increased LOC Amount shall be reduced to the original LOC Amount of One Million Dollars ($1,000,000.00): (a) Tenant is not and for the preceding twelve (12) successive calendar months, has not been in material default under the terms of this Lease beyond any applicable cure period; and (b) Tenant meets the Minimum Standards; and (c) Tenant provides to Landlord ten (10) days prior notice of any such reduction; and (d) the text of the LOC provides that the issuing bank shall notify Landlord in writing prior to any such reduction. In the event that such reduction to the LOC Amount is made and, subsequently, Tenant fails to meet any of the above conditions for a period of thirty (30) days following delivery by Landlord of written notice of any such failure, Tenant shall, within ten (10) business days after Landlord's written notice, increase the LOC Amount to the Increased LOC Amount.
8. Base Rent Adjustment. During the initial Term of this Lease, Landlord shall provide a credit to Tenant against Tenant's obligation to pay Base Rent hereunder in an amount equal to Six Hundred Twenty-Five Dollars ($625.00) per month. In the event that Tenant increases the LOC Amount as provided in Paragraph 39.H.6 above, for the period the LOC Amount remains equal to the Increased LOC Amount, Landlord shall increase such rent credit to Two Thousand Eight Hundred Seventy-Five Dollars ($2,875.00) per month (the "Increased Base Rent Adjustment"), prorated for any partial months; provided however, that Landlord shall only be obligated to provide the Increased Base Rent Adjustment during the initial thirty-six (36) months of the Term of this Lease."
4. Tenant's Proportionate Share. Tenant's Proportionate Share of the Building shall be one hundred percent (100%).
5. Tenant Improvements.
(a) Exhibit C. The terms and conditions of Exhibit C to the Lease shall apply to the Expansion Premises; provided, however, that any obligation with respect to the design, approval or construction of Tenant Improvements within the Expansion Premises shall not he deemed to have commenced until the exercise of the Option to Expand, and all time periods for such performance shall be correspondingly adjusted.
(b) Drywall Allowance. Landlord shall contribute an additional amount not to exceed Seventy-Nine Thousand Six Hundred Thirty Three and 48/100 Dollars (79,633.48) to the Drywall Allowance defined in Paragraph 4.1 of Exhibit C to the Lease which Drywall Allowance shall be used solely toward the cost of applying drywall to the exterior walls and columns within the Expansion Premises. The total amount of the Drywall Allowance shall not exceed Two Hundred Twenty-Nine Thousand Six Hundred Thirty-Three and 48/100 ($229,633.48).
(c) Base Building Work. The following definitions contained in Schedule 1 to Exhibit C of the Lease shall be amended as provided below:
(i) Site: 4.0546 net Acres, or 176,618 SF
(ii) Building Areas: Net Rentable Area 344,433 RSF
Parking 905
Spaces
6. Early Access. The terms and conditions of Paragraph 39.K of the Lease shall apply only to the Original Premises and shall not apply to the Expansion Premises.
7. Assignment and Subleasing. Pursuant to Paragraph 39.C of the Lease, Tenant hereby affirms that Tenant's exercise of its option to expand under Paragraph 39.C of the Lease shall constitute a representation by Tenant to Landlord that Tenant does not intend as of the date of this Amendment to assign the Lease for the Original Premises or the Expansion Premises in whole or in part, or sublet all or any portion of the Premises or the Expansion Premises, each except with respect to a Permitted Transferee, the election to expand being for the purpose of utilizing the Expansion Premises for Tenant's (or a Permitted Transferee's) purposes in the conduct of Tenant's (or a Permitted Transferee's) business therein.
8. BOMA Method of Measurement. Paragraph 39.I is deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:
"BOMA Method of Measurement. Landlord has measured the rentable square footage of the Premises, the Building and the Project all in accordance with the rentable standards set forth in ANSI/BOMA Z65.l -1996, as promulgated by the Building Owners and Managers Association, and its applicable guidelines ("BOMA Standard"). After substantial completion of the Tenant Improvements located in the Premises, Landlord shall have the right to remeasure the Premises and the Building. Tenant hall have a one-time right, exercisable within ten (10) business days after completion of the Base Building Work (as designated by notice from Landlord to Tenant) to remeasure the Premises and the Building. Tenant shall complete the remeasurement within ten (10) business days after expiration of the first ten (10) business day period. In the event such remeasurement of the Premises and the Building by Tenant, within the time period specified above, demonstrates to Landlord's reasonable satisfaction that the rentable square footage measurement prepared by Landlord produces a square footage number in excess of or lower than the square footage number which would have resulted had the BOMA Standard been properly applied, certain items and concepts addressed in this Lease with respect to the Premises, Base Rent, Tenant's Proportionate Share, and all other matters related to the measurement of the Building and the Premises shall be adjusted effective as of the Term Commencement Date, to reflect the actual number of rentable square feet, as properly remeasured under the BOMA Standard. Tenant shall have no further right to remeasure the Premises or the Building. In the event that Landlord and Tenant are unable to agree upon the measurement of the Premises or the Building as caused by Tenant within a reasonable period of time, the arbitration process described in Paragraph 39.J below shall apply."
10. Security System. Tenant, at its sole cost and expense, shall install a security system in the Building ("Tenant's Security System"). The review and approval provisions in Section 2 of Exhibit C to the Lease shall apply to Tenant's design and installation ("Tenant's Security System Plans") of Tenant's Security System. Tenant shall be responsible for ensuring that Tenant's Security System Plans are compatible with the design, construction and equipment of the Building, comply with applicable Regulations and the Standards (defined in Exhibit C to the Lease), and contain all such information as may be required to show location and system requirements. Tenant's Security System Plans shall also include electrical engineering drawings mutually satisfactory to Landlord and Tenant which shall be prepared by Tenant's electrical engineer, which approval shall not be unreasonably withheld. Notwithstanding Landlord's preparation, review and approval of Tenant's Security System Plans and any revisions thereto, Landlord shall have no responsibility or liability whatsoever for any errors or omissions contained in Tenant's Security System Plans or any revisions thereto, or to verify dimensions or conditions, or for the quality, design or compliance with applicable Regulations of any improvements described therein or constructed in accordance therewith. Tenant hereby waives all claims against Landlord relating to, or arising out of the design or construction of, Tenant's Security System. Tenant shall be solely liable for the repair and maintenance of Tenant's Security System. Tenant shall indemnify, defend (by counsel reasonably acceptable to Landlord), protect and hold Landlord harmless from and against any loss, cost, expense, damage, attorneys' fees or liability arising directly or indirectly from, or otherwise related to, Tenant's Security System. Tenant acknowledges and agrees that it shall be solely responsible for providing adequate security for its use of the Premises and the Building and that Landlord shall have no obligation or liability with respect thereto. In the event that the Lease is assigned in accordance with the terms of the Lease, to a party other than a Permitted Transferee, or Tenant otherwise relinquishes its leasehold interest in all or a portion of the Premises in accordance with the Lease or other written agreement between the parties hereto, Tenant shall, at Landlord's election, remove Tenant's Security System in accordance with Tenant's removal obligations described below in this Paragraph 10. Tenant's Security System shall not limit any rights or obligations contained in the Lease. Upon expiration or earlier termination of the Lease, Tenant's Security System shall be deemed an Alteration pursuant to Paragraph 12 of the Lease, except as expressly provided herein. Tenant's Security System shall remain the property of Tenant. Tenant shall, at Tenant's sole costs and expense, remove Tenant's Security System and restore any damage to the Premises, Building and Project caused by the installation, maintenance or removal or Tenant's Security System by the expiration or earlier termination of the Lease, to their condition existing prior to the installation of Tenant's Security System. Such removal and restoration shall be accomplished in a first-class and good and workmanlike manner so as not to cause any damage to the Premises, Building or Project whatsoever. If Tenant fails to remove Tenant's Security System, Landlord may keep Tenant's Security System or remove Tenant's Security System and cause it to be stored or sold in accordance with applicable law, at Tenant's sole expense.
All other terms and conditions of the Lease shall remain in full force and effect and shall apply to the Premises as well as to the original premises.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment Number One as of the day and year first above written.
Dated: October 26, 2000
Landlord:
MV GOLDEN STATE EMERYVILLE, LLC,
a Delaware limited
liability company
By: Spieker Properties, L.P.,
a California limited
partnership,
its duly authorized leasing agent
By: Spieker Properties, Inc.,
a Maryland corporation
its
general partner
By: /s/ Christopher T. White
Christopher T.
White
Tenant:
SIEBEL SYSTEMS, INC.,
a Delaware corporation
By: /s/ Jeffrey T. Amann
Jeffrey T. Amann
Its:
Secretary
AMENDMENT NUMBER TWO TO LEASE
THIS AMENDMENT NUMBER TWO TO LEASE (this "Amendment Number Two") is made this 29th of June, 2001, between MV Golden State Emeryville, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, ("Landlord"), and Siebel Systems, Inc., a Delaware corporation ("Tenant").
WHEREAS, Spieker Properties, L.P., a California limited partnership ("Spieker") and Tenant entered into a Lease dated August 16, 1999, as modified by that certain Amendment Number One to Lease dated as of October 26, 2000 (as amended, the "Lease"), for those certain premises located at 2100 Powell Street, Emeryville, California (the "Premises"), as more filly described in the Lease. Capitalized terms used but not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings given them in the Lease; and
WHEREAS, in connection with a separate transaction, Spieker, as ground lessor, entered into a certain ground lease (the "Ground Lease") with Landlord, as ground lessee, covering the Building; and
WHEREAS, in connection with the Ground Lease, Spieker assigned its rights and obligations under the Lease to Landlord; and
WHEREAS, Landlord and Tenant desire to modify the Lease as provided herein.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the covenants and agreements contained herein, the parties hereby mutually agree as follows:
1. Location of Childcare Facility. The Childcare Facility (as herein defined) shall be located on a portion of the Premises located on the third (3rd) floor of the Building. The usable and rentable areas of the Premises, as well as Base Rent and the Security Deposit under the Lease, shall not be affected by the construction and the use of the Childcare Facility Improvements or use of any common area of the Building as part of or directly in connection with the Childcare Facility in accordance with the terms and conditions of the Lease as modified hereby.
2. Construction of the Childcare Facility, Transit Area and Outdoor Play Area. Tenant shall construct the Childcare Facility, Outdoor Play Area and any additional improvements in the Transit Area, all as described in Exhibit B attached hereto (the "Childcare Facility Improvements"). The terms and conditions of Exhibit C to the Lease shall apply to Tenant's design and construction of the Childcare Facility Improvements; provided, however, that (a) Landlord hereby approves Webcor as the general contractor for construction of the Childcare Facility Improvements, (b) the Term Commencement Date shall be deemed to have occurred and shall not be affected by the construction of the Childcare Facility Improvements, (c) any obligation with respect to the design, approval or construction of the Childcare Facility Improvements shall be deemed to have commenced as of the date of this Amendment, and (d) the provisions of Section 7.1 of Exhibit C shall not apply to the construction of the Childcare Facility Improvements.
3. Permitted Use. The Permitted Use as defined in the Basic Lease Information is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following: "General office use and training and call center uses and, on a portion of the third (3rd) floor of the Building only, plus a portion of the parking area indicated on Exhibit A to Amendment Number Two to Lease, the operation of a childcare facility (the "Childcare Facility") in accordance with the terms of this Lease, as amended". Notwithstanding the provisions of Paragraph 4 of the Lease, the children utilizing the Childcare Facility shall not be counted in computing the Occupancy Density under the Lease with respect to the Occupancy Density allocable to the third (3rd) floor of the Building. Landlord further acknowledges and agrees that noise may emanate from the Childcare Facility, and that any such noise which is consistent with similarly situated childcare facilities shall not be deemed a breach of the limitations set forth in Paragraph 4.B of the Lease so long as Tenant or a Permitted Transferee(s) and any other permitted subtenant or assignee of Tenant who has acknowledged and approved such use in writing occupies the second (2nd), third (3rd) and fourth (4th) floors of the Building.
4. Parking Area. A portion of the parking area located in the common area of the Project (as depicted on Exhibit A to this Amendment Number Two) shall be utilized by Tenant solely in connection with the operation of the Childcare Facility. Certain parking spaces as indicated on Exhibit A are allocated for servicing the Childcare Facility and shall be used solely for short term parking to accommodate child arrival and departure (the "Transit Area"). Certain parking spaces as indicated on Exhibit A are allocated for servicing the Childcare Facility and shall be used solely for an outside play area (the "Outside Play Area"). Tenant hereby acknowledges and agrees that the parking spaces located in the Transit Area and the Outside Play Area are included in and a part of the number of parking spaces allocated for Tenant's use in the Basic Lease Information of the Lease and for which Tenant is responsible for parking charges as indicated in the Lease.
5. Management/Operation of Childcare Facility.
(a) Tenant shall make the Childcare Facility available to children of its then current employees, recently departing employees entitled to continued childcare coverage pursuant to Tenant's company policy on a temporary basis and contractors of Tenant and Tenant's Permitted Transferees, and to no other person without the prior written consent of Landlord.
(b) Tenant hereby acknowledges and agrees that Tenant is solely liable for the operation and management of the Childcare Facility and that Landlord shall not be directly or indirectly liable for the operation and/or management of the Childcare Facility. Tenant hereby agrees that it shall expressly inform all employees and contractors utilizing the Childcare Facility that Landlord is not responsible for the operation and management of the Childcare Facility. Landlord may, but shall not be obligated to, post signage at and/or about the Premises and Project disclaiming liability for the operation and management of the Childcare Facility. Tenant may contract the operation of the Childcare Facility to a third party provider reasonably acceptable to Landlord. Landlord acknowledges that such provider may change from time to time. Landlord hereby consents to Tenant engaging Bright Horizons to operate the Childcare Facility.
(c) Landlord shall have no obligation to provide janitorial service to the Childcare Facility. Tenant shall be liable for maintaining the Transit Area and the Outdoor Play Area in a clean condition.
6. Insurance; Indemnity. Tenant's insurance and indemnity requirements contained in Paragraph 8 of the Lease shall apply to the Premises and the Transit Area and Outside Play Area. In addition to the insurance that Tenant is required to obtain and maintain pursuant to the Lease, Tenant shall obtain and maintain any other types of insurance that may be required by Landlord's lender from time to time. In addition, Tenant shall confirm that its general liability policy contains no exclusion for childcare molestation and/or sexual abuse, and that such coverage applies to all parties using and/or occupying the Childcare Facility, the Transit Area and/or the Outside Play Area. Tenant shall deliver to Landlord an insurance certificate evidencing such insurance coverage no later than ten (10) days before the date Tenant commences use of the Childcare Facility, and thereafter at least thirty (30) days before the expiration dates of the expiration of such coverage.
7. Surrender of Childcare Facility, Transit Area and Outside Play Area; Tenant's Removal and Restoration Obligations. Upon expiration or earlier termination of the Lease, Tenant shall remove the Childcare Facility Improvements and restore the Premises and Project in accordance with the terms of the Lease as modified hereby. All Childcare Facility Improvements shall remain the property of Tenant until the expiration or earlier termination of this Lease, at which time the Childcare Facility Improvements, other than furniture, fixtures and equipment, shall be and become the property of Landlord; provided, however, that Landlord may, at Landlord's option, require that Tenant, at Tenant's expense, remove any or all Childcare Facility Improvements made by Tenant and restore the portion of the Premises upon which the Childcare Facility is located, including restoration of any exit points to the building made in connection with the Childcare Facility Improvements, by the expiration or earlier termination of this Lease to a warm shell condition. Upon expiration or earlier termination of the Lease, or upon termination of the use of the Childcare Facility, Tenant shall restore the Transit Area and the Outdoor Play Area to a parking configuration consistent with the parking configuration standards then in effect in the Project. All such removals and restoration shall be accomplished in a first-class and good and workmanlike manner so as not to cause any damage to the Premises or Project whatsoever. If Tenant fails to remove such Childcare Facility Improvements or other personal property, Landlord may keep and use them or remove any of them and cause them to be stored or sold in accordance with applicable law, at Tenant's sole expense. In addition to and wholly apart from Tenant's obligation to pay Tenant's Proportionate Share of Operating Expenses, Tenant shall be responsible for and shall pay prior to delinquency any taxes or governmental service fees, possessory interest taxes, fees or charges in lieu of any such taxes, capital levies, or other charges imposed upon, levied with respect to or assessed against its fixtures or personal property, on the value of Childcare Facility Improvements within the Premises or any increase in any of the foregoing based on such Childcare Facility Improvements. To the extent that any such taxes are not separately assessed or billed to Tenant, Tenant shall pay the amount thereof as invoiced to Tenant by Landlord.
8. Compliance with Laws. Tenant shall, at its sole cost and expense, comply with Regulations in accordance with the terms of the Lease and with respect to Regulations regarding the construction, operation, maintenance and removal of the Childcare Facility.
9. Termination of Childcare Facility. Tenant may elect at any time during the term of this Lease to terminate the use of the Childcare Facility. In such event, Tenant may modify the Premises to accommodate the Permitted Use under the Lease, subject to the provisions of Section 12 of the Lease, and Tenant shall restore promptly the Transit Area and the Outdoor Play Area to a parking configuration consistent with the parking configuration standards then in effect in the Project. All such removals and restoration shall be accomplished in a first-class and good and workmanlike manner so as not to cause any irreparable damage to the Premises or Project whatsoever, and otherwise consistent with the terms and conditions of the Lease as modified hereby.
All other terms and conditions of the Lease shall remain in full force and effect and shall apply to the Premises, including the Childcare Facility, the Transit Area and the Outdoor Play Area.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment Number Two as of the day and year first above written.
Dated: June 29, 2001
Landlord:
MV GOLDEN STATE EMERYVILLE, LLC,
a Delaware limited
liability company
By: Spieker Properties, L.P.,
a California limited partnership,
its duly authorized
leasing agent
By: Spieker Properties, Inc.,
a Maryland corporation
its
general partner
By: /s/ Pamela Lakey
Pamela Lakey
Tenant:
SIEBEL SYSTEMS, INC.,
a Delaware corporation
By: /s/ Jeffrey T. Amann
Jeffrey T. Amann
Its:
Secretary
Exhibit 99.1
Certification Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Corporate Fraud Accountability Act of 2002
Pursuant to the requirement set forth in Section 906 of the Corporate Fraud Accountability Act of 2002, Thomas M. Siebel and Kenneth A. Goldman each hereby certify that:
/s/ Thomas M. Siebel |
/s/ Kenneth A. Goldman |