XML 36 R23.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.21.2
Fair Value Measurement
3 Months Ended
Sep. 30, 2021
Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract]  
Fair Value Measurement Fair Value Measurement
Accounting guidelines for measuring fair value establish a three-level valuation hierarchy for disclosure of fair value measurements. The valuation hierarchy categorizes assets and liabilities measured at fair value into one of three different levels depending on the observability of the inputs employed in the measurement.
The three levels are defined as follows:
Level 1—Observable inputs such as quoted prices in active markets at the measurement date for identical unrestricted assets or liabilities.
Level 2—Other inputs that are observable directly or indirectly, such as quoted prices in markets that are not active or inputs which are observable, either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the asset or liability.
Level 3—Unobservable inputs for which there are little or no market data and which the Company makes its own assumptions about how market participants would price the assets and liabilities.
Fair Value of Derivative Instruments. The Company’s determination of fair value incorporates not only the credit standing of the counterparties involved in transactions with the Company resulting in receivables on the Company’s consolidated balance sheets, but also the impact of the Company’s nonperformance risk on its own liabilities. Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. ASC 820 – Fair Value Measurement (“ASC 820”) establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value. The Company utilizes market data or assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability, including assumptions about risk and the risks inherent in the inputs to the valuation technique. These inputs are generally market corroborated (Level 2), and the Company classifies fair value balances as such. The Company did not have any open derivative trades as of September 30, 2021, and had a $1.1 million derivative liability balance as of September 30, 2020, which was settled during fiscal year 2021.
As required by ASC 820, a financial instrument’s level within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The Company’s assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement requires judgment. This may affect the valuation of fair value assets and liabilities and their placement within the fair value hierarchy levels. There were no transfers between fair value hierarchy levels for any period presented in this report. The Company did not have any open derivative positions as of September 30, 2021. The table below sets forth the Company’s derivative assets and liabilities whose fair value measurements all reflect Level 2 inputs at September 30, 2020.
September 30, 2020
(Asset) LiabilityGross Amounts RecognizedGross Amounts Offset in the Consolidated Balance SheetNet Amounts Presented in the Consolidated Balance Sheets
Current derivative contract assets$— $— $ 
Current derivative contract liabilities1,094,734 — 1,094,734 
Total derivative contract liabilities$1,094,734 $— $1,094,734 
Other Fair Value Measurements. The initial measurement and any subsequent revision of asset retirement obligations at fair value are calculated using discounted future cash flows of internally estimated costs. Significant Level 3 inputs used in the calculation of asset retirement obligations include the costs of plugging and abandoning wells, surface restoration, and reserve lives. Subsequent to initial recognition, revisions to estimated asset retirement obligations are made when changes occur for input values