-----BEGIN PRIVACY-ENHANCED MESSAGE----- Proc-Type: 2001,MIC-CLEAR Originator-Name: webmaster@www.sec.gov Originator-Key-Asymmetric: MFgwCgYEVQgBAQICAf8DSgAwRwJAW2sNKK9AVtBzYZmr6aGjlWyK3XmZv3dTINen TWSM7vrzLADbmYQaionwg5sDW3P6oaM5D3tdezXMm7z1T+B+twIDAQAB MIC-Info: RSA-MD5,RSA, Tr1zmSOuakCCMFSjmpxJ31VoHsM+psrDDUhx+cgHijXu5hXMjE9lc2sG0cpaLTK9 M/oJ27qaPmFy0HLgwRiIYg== 0001081316-08-000017.txt : 20080429 0001081316-08-000017.hdr.sgml : 20080429 20080429155201 ACCESSION NUMBER: 0001081316-08-000017 CONFORMED SUBMISSION TYPE: 10-Q PUBLIC DOCUMENT COUNT: 5 CONFORMED PERIOD OF REPORT: 20080331 FILED AS OF DATE: 20080429 DATE AS OF CHANGE: 20080429 FILER: COMPANY DATA: COMPANY CONFORMED NAME: CE CASECNAN WATER & ENERGY CO INC CENTRAL INDEX KEY: 0001006402 STANDARD INDUSTRIAL CLASSIFICATION: ELECTRIC SERVICES [4911] IRS NUMBER: 000000000 FISCAL YEAR END: 1231 FILING VALUES: FORM TYPE: 10-Q SEC ACT: 1934 Act SEC FILE NUMBER: 001-12995 FILM NUMBER: 08785293 BUSINESS ADDRESS: STREET 1: 24TH FLOOR STREET 2: 6750 BUILDING, AYALA AVENUE CITY: MAKATI, METRO MANILA STATE: R6 ZIP: 68107 BUSINESS PHONE: 632-892-0276 MAIL ADDRESS: STREET 1: MIDAMERICAN ENERGY HOLDINGS CO. STREET 2: 666 GRAND AVENUE, PO BOX 657 CITY: DES MOINES STATE: IA ZIP: 50303-0657 10-Q 1 cecasecnan33108_10q.htm CE CASECNAN WATER AND ENERGY COMPANY, INC. FORM 10Q cecasecnan33108_10q.htm



UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

[x] Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2008

or

[  ] Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

For the transition period from ________to_______

Commission File No. 001-12995

CE CASECNAN WATER AND ENERGY COMPANY, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Philippines
 
Not Applicable
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
 
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
     
24th Floor, 6750 Building, Ayala Avenue
Makati, Metro Manila, Philippines
 
Not Applicable
(Address of principal executive offices)
 
(Zip Code)
 
011 63 2 892-0276
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
N/A
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes o No   T

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” ”accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer o
Accelerated filer o
Non-accelerated filer T
Smaller reporting company  o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes  o  No  T

All of the shares of common equity of CE Casecnan Water and Energy Company, Inc. are privately held by a limited group of investors. As of April 29, 2008, the number of outstanding shares of $0.038 par value common stock was 767,162.


 
 

 


TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION







 
  2

 


PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION


Financial Statements

 

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm


To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of
CE Casecnan Water and Energy Company, Inc.

We have reviewed the accompanying balance sheet of CE Casecnan Water and Energy Company, Inc. (the “Company”) as of March 31, 2008, and the related statements of operations, of changes in shareholders’ equity and of cash flows for each of the three-month periods ended March 31, 2008 and 2007. These interim financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management.

We conducted our review in accordance with standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). A review of interim financial information consists principally of applying analytical review procedures and making inquiries of persons responsible for financial and accounting matters. It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in accordance with standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, the objective of which is the expression of an opinion regarding the financial statements taken as a whole. Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.

Based on our review, we are not aware of any material modifications that should be made to the accompanying interim financial statements for them to be in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

We previously audited in accordance with standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the balance sheet as of December 31, 2007, and the related statements of operations, of changes in shareholders’ equity and of cash flows for the year then ended (not presented herein), and in our report dated February 27, 2008, we expressed an unqualified opinion on those financial statements. In our opinion, the information set forth in the accompanying balance sheet as of December 31, 2007, is fairly stated in all material respects in relation to the balance sheet from which it has been derived.

/s/ Isla Lipana & Co.

ISLA LIPANA & CO.
A PricewaterhouseCoopers Member Firm
Makati City, Philippines
April 29, 2008

 

 


CE CASECNAN WATER AND ENERGY COMPANY, INC.
BALANCE SHEETS (Unaudited)
(Amounts in thousands, except share data)

   
As of
 
   
March 31,
   
December 31,
 
   
2008
   
2007
 
             
ASSETS
 
             
Current assets:
           
Cash and cash equivalents
  $ 64,052     $ 31,083  
Restricted cash and investments
    22,816       22,414  
Trade receivable, net
    15,290       20,365  
Prepaid insurance and other current assets
    7,148       6,653  
Total current assets
    109,306       80,515  
                 
Property, plant and equipment, net
    297,656       303,056  
Other investments
    6,900       7,503  
Long-term restricted cash and investments
    12,692       13,906  
Deferred income taxes
    5,639       5,198  
Bond issue costs, net
    460       539  
Total assets
  $ 432,653     $ 410,717  
                 
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
 
                 
Current liabilities:
               
Accounts payable and other accrued liabilities
  $ 4,026     $ 5,171  
Dividends payable
    10,825       10,825  
Accrued interest
    10,629       7,801  
Income tax payable
    9,742       3,032  
Payable to affiliates
    2,463       2,480  
Notes payable
    39,200       39,200  
Current portion of long-term debt
    37,730       37,730  
Total current liabilities
    114,615       106,239  
                 
Deferred revenue
    3,648       1,768  
Long-term debt, net of current portion
    30,870       30,870  
Total liabilities
    149,133       138,877  
                 
Commitments and contingencies (Note 6)
               
                 
Shareholders’ equity:
               
Common stock – 2,148,000 shares authorized, one Philippine peso ($0.038) par value; 767,162 shares issued and outstanding
    29       29  
Additional paid-in capital
    123,807       123,807  
Retained earnings
    160,865       148,004  
Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net
    (1,181 )     -  
Total shareholders’ equity
    283,520       271,840  
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity
  $ 432,653     $ 410,717  

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

 

 


CE CASECNAN WATER AND ENERGY COMPANY, INC.
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (Unaudited)
(Amounts in thousands)

   
Three-Month Periods
 
   
Ended March 31,
 
   
2008
   
2007
 
       
Revenue:
           
Lease rentals and service contracts
  $ 28,894     $ 24,338  
                 
Operating expenses:
               
Depreciation
    5,402       5,406  
    Plant operations and other operating expenses
    2,219       1,823  
Total operating expenses
    7,621       7,229  
                 
Operating income
    21,273       17,109  
                 
Other income (expense):
               
Interest expense
    (3,102 )     (4,650 )
Interest income
    662       861  
Other, net
    937       980  
Total other income (expense)
    (1,503 )     (2,809 )
                 
Income before income tax expense
    19,770       14,300  
                 
Income tax expense
    6,909       626  
                 
Net income
  $ 12,861     $ 13,674  

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

 

 


CE CASECNAN WATER AND ENERGY COMPANY, INC.
STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY (Unaudited)
FOR THE THREE-MONTH PERIODS ENDED MARCH 31, 2008 AND 2007
(Amounts in thousands of U.S. Dollars)

                     
Accumulated
       
         
Additional
         
Other
       
   
Common
   
Paid-in
   
Retained
   
Comprehensive
       
   
Stock
   
Capital
   
Earnings
   
Loss, net
   
Total
 
                               
Balance, January 1, 2007
  $ 29     $ 123,807     $ 69,465     $ -     $ 193,301  
Net income
    -       -       13,674       -       13,674  
Balance, March 31, 2007
  $ 29     $ 123,807     $ 83,139     $ -     $ 206,975  
                                         
Balance, January 1, 2008
  $ 29     $ 123,807     $ 148,004     $ -     $ 271,840  
Net income
    -       -       12,861       -       12,861  
Other comprehensive loss
    -       -       -       (1,181 )     (1,181 )
Balance, March 31, 2008
  $ 29     $ 123,807     $ 160,865     $ (1,181 )   $ 283,520  

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.


 
 6

 


CE CASECNAN WATER AND ENERGY COMPANY, INC.
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (Unaudited)
(Amounts in thousands of U.S. Dollars)

   
Three-Month Periods
 
   
Ended March 31,
 
   
2008
   
2007
 
             
Cash flows from operating activities:
           
Net income
  $ 12,861     $ 13,674  
Adjustments to reconcile net income to cash flows from operating activities:
               
Depreciation
    5,402       5,406  
Amortization of bond issue costs
    79       130  
Provision for deferred income taxes
    195       -  
Changes in other items:
               
Trade receivable, net
    5,075       (270 )
Prepaid insurance and other current assets
    (495 )     (205 )
Accounts payable and other accrued liabilities
    (1,145 )     (346 )
Accrued interest
    2,828       4,520  
Income tax payable
    6,710       626  
Deferred revenue
    1,880       1,880  
Net cash flows from operating activities
    33,390       25,415  
                 
Cash flows from investing activities:
               
(Additions to) disposals of property, plant and equipment
    (2 )     4  
  Purchases of available-for-sale securities
    -       (30,000 )
  Proceeds from sale of available-for-sale securities
    -       15,000  
  Increase in restricted cash and investments for debt service obligations and dividends payable
    (402 )     (886 )
Net cash flows from investing activities
    (404 )     (15,882 )
                 
Cash flows from financing activities:
               
Decrease (increase) in payable to affiliates
    (17 )     580  
Net cash flows from financing activities
    (17 )     580  
                 
Net change in cash and cash equivalents
    32,969       10,113  
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
    31,083       31,946  
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
  $ 64,052     $ 42,059  
                 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.


 
  7

 


CE CASECNAN WATER AND ENERGY COMPANY, INC.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)

(1)
General

CE Casecnan Water and Energy Company, Inc. (“CE Casecnan” or the “Company”) has a contract with the Republic of the Philippines (“ROP”), through the Philippine National Irrigation Administration (“NIA”) (a ROP-owned and controlled corporation), for the development and construction of a hydroelectric power plant and related facilities under a build-own-operate-transfer agreement, as amended by the Supplemental Agreement dated September 29, 2003 (“Project Agreement”), covering a 20-year cooperation period (“Cooperation Period”) commencing December 11, 2001, with “take-or-pay” obligations for water and electricity. At the end of the Cooperation Period, the combined irrigation and 150 megawatt hydroelectric power generation project (the “Casecnan Project”) will be transferred to the ROP at no cost on an “as is” basis. The ROP also signed a Performance Undertaking, which, among others, affirms and guarantees the obligations of NIA under the Project Agreement.

Under the terms of its registration with the Philippine Board of Investments, the Company was entitled to certain incentives which include an income tax holiday for six years from the start of commercial operations. The registration also requires, among others, the maintenance of a debt-to-equity ratio not exceeding 75:25 during commercial operations. The income tax holiday expired on December 11, 2007. The Company’s taxable income from December 11, 2007 forward is subject to income tax at the current Philippine statutory rate.

The Casecnan Project is dependent upon sufficient rainfall to generate electricity and deliver water. The seasonality of rainfall patterns and the variability of rainfall from year to year, all of which are outside the control of the Company, have a material impact on the amounts of electricity generated and water delivered by the Casecnan Project. Rainfall has historically been highest from June through December and lowest from January through May. The contractual terms for water delivery fees and variable energy fees can produce significant variability in revenue between reporting periods.

The Company’s operations are in one reportable segment, the water delivery and electricity generation industry.

The unaudited Financial Statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) for interim financial information and the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and regulations for Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the disclosures required by GAAP for annual financial statements. Management believes the unaudited Financial Statements contain all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring adjustments) considered necessary for the fair presentation of the Financial Statements as of March 31, 2008 and for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2008 and 2007. Gross purchases and sales of available-for-sale securities were presented in the Statement of Cash Flows under investing activities in 2007 to conform to the 2008 presentation. Such revisions in presentation did not impact previously reported net cash flows from investing activities, operating income, net income or retained earnings. The results of operations for the three-month period ended March 31, 2008 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year.

The preparation of the unaudited Financial Statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the period. Actual results may differ from the estimates used in preparing the unaudited Financial Statements. Management’s Discussion and Analysis and Note 2 of Notes to Financial Statements included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 describe the most significant accounting estimates and policies used in the preparation of the Financial Statements. There have been no significant changes in the Company’s assumptions regarding significant accounting policies during the first three months of 2008.


 
  8

 

(2)
New Accounting Pronouncements
 

In February 2007, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 159, “The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities - including an amendment of FASB Statement No. 115” (“SFAS No. 159”). SFAS No. 159 permits entities to elect to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value. Upon adoption of SFAS No. 159, an entity may elect the fair value option for eligible items that exist at the adoption date. Subsequent to the initial adoption, the election of the fair value option may only be made at initial recognition of the asset or liability or upon a remeasurement event that gives rise to new-basis accounting. The decision about whether to elect the fair value option is applied on an instrument-by-instrument basis, is irrevocable and is applied only to an entire instrument and not only to specified risks, cash flows or portions of that instrument. SFAS No. 159 does not affect any existing accounting literature that requires certain assets and liabilities to be carried at fair value nor does it eliminate disclosure requirements included in other accounting standards. The Company adopted SFAS No. 159 effective January 1, 2008, and did not elect the fair value option for any existing eligible items.

In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements” (“SFAS No. 157”). SFAS No. 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. SFAS No. 157 does not impose fair value measurements on items not already accounted for at fair value; rather it applies, with certain exceptions, to other accounting pronouncements that either require or permit fair value measurements. Under SFAS No. 157, fair value refers to the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants in the principal or most advantageous market. The standard clarifies that fair value should be based on the assumptions market participants would use when pricing the asset or liability. In February 2008, the FASB issued Staff Position No. 157-2, “Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 157” (FSP FAS 157-2”), which delays the effective date of SFAS No. 157 for all non-financial assets and liabilities, except those that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the Financial Statements on a recurring basis until fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008. The Company adopted the provisions of SFAS No. 157 for assets and liabilities recognized at fair value on a recurring basis effective January 1, 2008. The partial adoption of SFAS No. 157 did not have a material impact on the Company’s Financial Statements. Refer to Note 7 for additional discussion.

(3)           Restricted Cash and Investments and Other Investments

Restricted cash and investments consist of the following (in thousands):

   
March 31, 2008
   
December 31, 2007
 
Current:
           
Debt service reserve fund
  $ 9,667     $ 9,360  
Dividend set aside account
    13,149       13,054  
    $ 22,816     $ 22,414  
                 
Noncurrent - Debt service reserve fund
  $ 12,692     $ 13,906  


Restricted cash and investments represent various U.S. dollar money market investments and auction rate securities. The debt service reserve fund is invested in U.S. dollar money-market instruments and auction rate securities. The dividend set aside account is composed entirely of U.S. dollar money-market instruments. Auction rate securities included in long-term restricted cash and investments at March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007, had a carrying value of $12.7 million and $13.9 million, respectively, and had a remaining maturity of 26 years.

Other investments consist of auction rate securities with a carrying value of $6.9 million and $7.5 million at March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively, and had a remaining maturity of 17 years.
 
With the liquidity issues experienced in global credit and capital markets, the $21.4 million par value of auction rate securities held by the Company at March 31, 2008 have experienced multiple failed auctions as the amount of securities submitted for sale has exceeded the amount of purchase orders. However, all these securities retain Moody’s Investors Service and Standard & Poor’s highest credit ratings at March 31, 2008.
 
9


Although there is no current liquid market for the auction rate securities, the Company believes the underlying creditworthiness of the repayment sources for these securities’ principal and interest has not materially deteriorated. Further, the Company has the intent and ability to hold the auction rate securities for a period of time sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery. At March 31, 2008, the Company recorded a pre-tax temporary impairment of the auction rate securities amounting to $1.8 million. If the underlying assets or guarantors experience further credit deterioration on the auction rate securities, the Company may not ultimately realize the par value of the investment at March 31, 2008.

Given the failed auctions, it is uncertain if the Company's auction rate securities will be sold within the next twelve months. Accordingly, the entire amount of such remaining balance has been classified as non-current assets on the Company's March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007 Balance Sheets.

(4)
Income Taxes

During the three-month periods ended March 31, 2008 and 2007, CE Casecnan incurred $6.9 million and $0.6 million, respectively, of income taxes. Prior to the December 11, 2007 expiration of the income tax holiday granted to the Company by the Philippine Board of Investments, income taxes were incurred only on interest income earned outside the Philippines and on other income not covered by the income tax holiday. The Company’s taxable income from December 11, 2007 forward is subject to income tax at the current Philippine statutory rate. The Company’s deferred income tax asset of $5.6 million and $5.1 million as of March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively, consists mainly of the difference between the financial reporting basis and the tax reporting basis for development and construction costs.

(5)
Related Party Transactions

In the normal course of business, the Company transacts with its affiliates in the form of advances for operating expenses. The payable to affiliates was $2.5 million at March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007. Costs incurred by the Company in transactions with related parties amounted to $0.4 million and $0.9 million for the three-month periods March 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively, and consist primarily of cost allocations.
 
As of March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007, the Company had outstanding $39.2 million of unsecured subordinated notes payable to CE Casecnan Ltd., a shareholder. The notes mature on November 1, 2015, and bear an interest rate consisting of the London Interbank Offer Rate plus 5.25%; however, CE Casecnan Ltd. can demand payment of the outstanding principal amount at any time prior to the maturity date. The interest is payable each May 15 and November 15. Interest expense on the notes was $1.0 million and $1.3 million for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively. Any overdue payment of principal or interest payable on the notes shall increase the annual interest rate by two percentage points. At March 31, 2008, the effective interest rate on the notes was 9.99%. The notes may be prepaid at any time without premium or penalty but with accrued interest, if any. The notes and any and all payments, whether of principal, interest or otherwise are subject in all respects to the terms of the Subordination Agreement dated November 15, 2001, and as amended on November 1, 2005, between CE Casecnan Ltd. and the Company in favor of the Trustee, the Collateral Agent, the co-collateral agent, the Depositary, any party that becomes a Permitted Counterparty under an Interest Rate/Currency Protection Agreement, and any party that becomes a working capital facility agent and any other Person that becomes a secured party under the Intercreditor Agreement.
 
On May 15, 2007, CE Casecnan Ltd. demanded payment in full of the outstanding principal amount of the notes and accrued interest. To the extent that the Company does not have available cash from distributions from the Distribution Fund under the Depositary Agreement (each, as defined in the Subordination Agreement) to pay such amount in full, the Company shall be deemed to have satisfied this demand by paying, to the extent of such available cash, first accrued but unpaid interest on the outstanding principal amount of the notes, and then the outstanding principal amount of the notes. To the extent that such available cash is insufficient to pay any accrued interest or outstanding principal, the Company shall not be deemed in default and such amounts shall remain outstanding and payable pursuant to the terms of the notes and the Subordination Agreement. CE Casecnan intends to repay the notes and accrued interest within the next nine months. The Company expects to generate sufficient cash from operations, after considering income taxes, to pay the notes and other short-term obligations.
 
10


(6)
Commitments and Contingencies

Shareholder Litigation

Pursuant to the share ownership adjustment mechanism in the CE Casecnan shareholder agreement, which is based upon proforma financial projections of the Casecnan Project prepared following commencement of commercial operations, in February 2002, MidAmerican Energy Holdings Company’s (“MEHC”) indirect wholly owned subsidiary, CE Casecnan Ltd., advised the minority shareholder of the Company, LaPrairie Group Contractors (International) Ltd. (“LPG”) that MEHC’s indirect ownership interest in CE Casecnan had increased to 100% effective from commencement of commercial operations. On July 8, 2002, LPG filed a complaint in the Superior Court of the State of California, City and County of San Francisco, against CE Casecnan Ltd. and MEHC. LPG’s complaint, as amended, seeks compensatory and punitive damages arising out of CE Casecnan Ltd.’s and MEHC’s alleged improper calculation of the proforma financial projections and alleged improper settlement of the NIA arbitration. The Company is not a defendant in the action. On January 3, 2006, the court entered a judgment in favor of LPG against CE Casecnan Ltd. Pursuant to the judgment, 15% of the distributions of the Company was deposited into escrow plus interest at 9% per annum. On February 21, 2007, the appellate court issued a decision, and as a result of the decision, CE Casecnan Ltd. determined that LPG would retain ownership of 10% of the shares of the Company, with the remaining 5% ownership being transferred to CE Casecnan Ltd. subject to certain buy-up rights under the shareholder agreement. Pursuant to the appellate court decision, on May 7, 2007, the Company released $21.7 million of dividends and $3.8 million of accrued interest from the dividend set aside account representing the 10% share to LPG while the remaining 5% share is still held in escrow. The parties have agreed to stipulate that the final calculation of the internal rate of return is 24.06%. At a hearing on October 10, 2007, the court determined that LPG was ready, willing and able to exercise its buy-up rights in 2007. Additional hearings were held on October 23 and 24, 2007, regarding the issue of the buy-up price calculation and a written decision was issued on February 4, 2008 specifying the method for determining LPG’s buy-up price. The court has scheduled a hearing for May 9, 2008, regarding the inclusion of certain tax considerations in the calculation of the buy-up price. Exercise of the buy-up rights under the shareholder agreement is a transaction between shareholders of the Company and is not expected to have any impact on the Company’s financial position or results of operations. LPG waived its request for a jury trial for the breach of fiduciary duty claim and the parties have entered into a stipulation which provides for a trial of such claim by the court based on the existing record of the case. The trial was held on April 23, 2008. The court took the matter under advisement and requested further briefs from the parties on the burden of proof to be applied. MEHC intends to vigorously defend and pursue the remaining claims.

In February 2003, San Lorenzo Ruiz Builders and Developers Group, Inc. (“San Lorenzo”), an original shareholder substantially all of whose shares in the Company were purchased by MEHC in 1998, threatened to initiate legal action against the Company in the Philippines in connection with certain aspects of its option to repurchase such shares. The Company believes that San Lorenzo has no valid basis for any claim and, if named as a defendant in any action that may be commenced by San Lorenzo, the Company will vigorously defend such action. On July 1, 2005, MEHC and CE Casecnan Ltd. commenced an action against San Lorenzo in the District Court of Douglas County, Nebraska, seeking a declaratory judgment as to MEHC’s and CE Casecnan Ltd.’s rights vis-à-vis San Lorenzo in respect of such shares. San Lorenzo filed a motion to dismiss on September 19, 2005. Subsequently, San Lorenzo purported to exercise its option to repurchase such shares. On January 30, 2006, San Lorenzo filed a counterclaim against MEHC and CE Casecnan Ltd. seeking declaratory relief that it has effectively exercised its option to purchase 15% of the shares of the Company, that it is the rightful owner of such shares and that it is due all dividends paid on such shares. On March 9, 2006, the court granted San Lorenzo’s motion to dismiss, but has since permitted MEHC and CE Casecnan Ltd. to file an amended complaint incorporating the purported exercise of the option. The complaint has been amended and the action is proceeding. Currently, the action is in the discovery phase and a one-week trial has been set to begin on November 3, 2008. The impact, if any, of San Lorenzo’s purported exercise of its option and the Nebraska litigation on the Company cannot be determined at this time.

 
11

 


Concentration of Risk

NIA’s obligations under the Project Agreement are substantially denominated in U.S. Dollars and are the Company’s sole source of operating revenue. Because of the Company’s dependence on NIA, any material failure of NIA to fulfill its obligations under the Project Agreement and any material failure of the ROP to fulfill its obligations under the Performance Undertaking would significantly impair the ability of the Company to meet its existing and future obligations, including obligations pertaining to its outstanding debt. No shareholders, partners or affiliates of the Company, including MEHC, and no directors, officers or employees of the Company have guaranteed or will be in any way liable for payment of the Company’s obligations. As a result, payment of the Company’s obligations depends upon the availability of sufficient revenue from the Company’s business after the payment of operating expenses.

Franchise Tax

CE Casecnan received franchise tax assessments for the years 2001 to 2006 totaling $2.2 million from the Province of Nueva Vizcaya. CE Casecnan believes that franchise tax is imposed on companies which have a secondary or special franchise from the government. CE Casecnan is an independent power producer and does not have a government franchise. The Electric Power Industry Reform Act of 2001 provides that independent power generation is not a public utility operation and does not require a franchise. Therefore, the Company has not recognized a liability relating to these assessments. CE Casecnan filed appeals of the assessments with the Regional Trial Court of Nueva Vizcaya. The appeals were referred to the Supreme Court Office of the Court Administrator and are currently pending.

(7)           Fair Value Measurements

The Company has auction rate securities that are measured at fair value in the Financial Statements. The Company uses a three level hierarchy for determining fair value and a financial asset or liability classification within the hierarchy is determined based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The auction rate securities were valued using Level 3 inputs that reflect the Company’s judgment about the assumptions market participants would use in pricing the asset. The fair value of these securities was determined using broker quotes, which the Company considers to be Level 3 inputs due to the limited market data that exists. The following table reconciles the beginning and ending balance of the Company’s auction rate securities measured at fair value on a recurring basis during the three-month period ended March 31, 2008 (in thousands):

   
Available-for-sale Securities
 
       
Balance, January 1, 2008
  $ 21,409  
Unrealized losses included in other comprehensive loss
    (1,817 )
Balance, March 31, 2008
  $ 19,592  
         


 
12 

 

(8)
Comprehensive Income and Components of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss, Net

The components of comprehensive income are as follows (in thousands):

   
Three-Month Periods
 
   
Ended March 31,
 
   
2008
   
2007
 
             
Net income
  $ 12,861     $ 13,674  
Other comprehensive loss – unrealized losses on marketable securities,
               
net of tax of $(636) and $-
    (1,181 )     -  
                 
Comprehensive income
  $ 11,680     $ 13,674  

Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net is included in the Balance Sheets in the shareholders’ equity section, and consists of unrealized losses on marketable securities totaling $1.2 million, net of tax of $0.6 million, as of March 31, 2008.

 
13 

 

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The following is management’s discussion and analysis of certain significant factors that have affected the financial condition and results of operations of CE Casecnan Water and Energy Company, Inc. (“CE Casecnan” or the “Company”) during the periods included herein. Explanations include management’s best estimate of the impact of weather and other factors. This discussion should be read in conjunction with the Company’s historical Financial Statements and the related notes thereto included in Item 1 of this Form 10-Q. The Company’s actual results in the future could differ significantly from the historical results.

Forward-Looking Statements

This report contains statements that do not directly or exclusively relate to historical facts. These statements are “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. You can typically identify forward-looking statements by the use of forward-looking words, such as “may,” “could,” “project,” “believe,” “anticipate,” “expect,” “estimate,” “continue,” “intend,” “potential,” “plan,” “forecast” and similar terms. These statements are based on the Company’s current intentions, assumptions, expectations and beliefs and are subject to risks, uncertainties and other important factors. Many of these factors are outside the Company’s control and could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied by the Company’s forward-looking statements. These factors include, among others:

 
·
changes in weather conditions that could affect operating revenue;
 
·
general economic, political and business conditions in the Philippines;
 
·
changes in governmental, legislative or regulatory requirements affecting the Company or the power generation industry;
 
·
availability of qualified personnel;
 
 
·
changes in financial or regulatory accounting principles or policies imposed by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the Financial Accounting Standards Board, the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) and similar entities with regulatory oversight; and
 
 
·
other business or investment considerations that may be disclosed from time to time in filings with the SEC or in other publicly disseminated written documents.
 
Further details of the potential risks and uncertainties affecting the Company are described in the Company’s filings with the SEC contained in this Form 10-Q. The Company undertakes no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. The foregoing review of factors should not be construed as exclusive.

Business

The Company has a contract with the Republic of the Philippines (“ROP”), through the Philippine National Irrigation Administration (“NIA”) (a ROP-owned and controlled corporation), for the development and construction of a hydroelectric power plant and related facilities under a build-own-operate-transfer agreement, as amended by the Supplemental Agreement dated September 29, 2003 (the “Project Agreement”), covering a 20-year cooperation period (“Cooperation Period”) commencing December 11, 2001, with “take-or-pay” obligations for water and electricity. At the end of the Cooperation Period, the combined irrigation and 150 megawatt hydroelectric power generation project (the “Casecnan Project”) will be transferred to the ROP at no cost on an “as is” basis. The ROP also signed a Performance Undertaking, which, among others, affirms and guarantees the obligations of NIA under the Project Agreement. Under the terms of its registration with the Philippine Board of Investments, CE Casecnan is entitled to certain incentives which include an income tax holiday for six years from the start of commercial operations. The Casecnan Project Cooperation Period began upon commencement of commercial operations on December 11, 2001. The income tax holiday expired on December 11, 2007. The Company’s taxable income from December 11, 2007 forward is subject to income tax at the current Philippine statutory rate.
 
14


Seasonality

The Casecnan Project is dependent upon sufficient rainfall to generate electricity and deliver water. The seasonality of rainfall patterns and the variability of rainfall from year to year, all of which are outside the control of the Company, have a material impact on the amounts of electricity generated and water delivered by the Casecnan Project. Rainfall has historically been highest from June through December and lowest from January through May. The contractual terms for water delivery fees and variable energy fees (described below) can produce significant variability in revenue between reporting periods.

Under the Project Agreement, the water delivery fee is a fixed monthly payment based upon an assumed annual water delivery of 801.9 million cubic meters, pro-rated to approximately 66.8 million cubic meters per month, multiplied by the water delivery fee rate of $0.07381 per cubic meter. For each contract year starting from December 25, 2003 and ending on December 25, 2008, a water delivery fee credit (deferred revenue) is computed equal to 801.9 million cubic meters minus the greater of actual water deliveries or 700.0 million cubic meters - the minimum threshold. The water delivery fee credit at the end of each contract year is available to be earned in the succeeding contract year through December 25, 2008. The cumulative water delivery fee credit at December 25, 2008, if any, shall be amortized on a straight-line basis from December 25, 2008 through December 25, 2013, as a reduction from billings to NIA. Accordingly, in recognizing revenue, the water delivery fees are recorded each month pro-rated to approximately 58.3 million cubic meters per month until the minimum threshold has been reached for the current contract year. Subsequent water delivery fees within the contract year are based on actual water delivered. For contract years starting from December 25, 2008 through the end of the Cooperation Period, guaranteed water delivery fees will be $51.7 million (the 700.0 million cubic meter minimum threshold multiplied by the water delivery fee rate of $0.07381).

For contract years starting from December 25, 2008 through the end of the Cooperation Period, variable water delivery fees will be earned for all water deliveries, if any, exceeding the 700.0 million cubic meter annual minimum threshold until a cumulative 1.324 billion cubic meters of water subject to variable water delivery fees have been delivered.

The Company earns guaranteed energy fees based upon an assumed delivery of 19.0 gigawatt hours (“GWh”) per month, at a rate of $0.1596 per kilowatt hour (“kWh”).

The Company earns variable energy fees based upon actual energy delivered in each month in excess of 19.0 GWh, currently payable at a rate of $0.1509 per kWh. On December 25, 2008, the kWh rate for energy deliveries in excess of 19.0 GWh per month is reduced to $0.1132, escalating at 1% per annum thereafter. Any deliveries of energy in excess of 490.0 GWh, but less than 550.0 GWh per year are paid at a rate of 1.3 pesos per kWh, reduced to 0.98 pesos starting in 2009 and escalated at 1% per annum thereafter. Deliveries in excess of 550.0 GWh per year are at no cost to NIA. Within each contract year, no variable energy fees are payable until energy in excess of the cumulative 19.0 GWh per month for the contract year to date has been delivered.

Results of Operations for the Three-Month Periods Ended March 31, 2008 and 2007

The following table provides certain operating data of the Casecnan Project for the three-month periods ended March 31:
 
2008
 
2007
       
Electricity produced (GWh)
99.4
 
59.0
Water delivered (million cubic meters)
172.3
 
102.5
 
15


For accounting purposes, the Project Agreement with NIA contains both an operating lease and a service contract, which the Company accounted for pursuant to the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 13, “Accounting for Leases.” Minimum lease payments under the operating lease are recognized as revenue on a straight-line basis over the lease term. The Company reduces such minimum lease revenues by an amount which is not reasonably assured to be collected due to the uncertain political and economic events in the Philippines and past actions by NIA with regard to claims against the Company. The reduction in the minimum lease revenues is recovered when its collectibility becomes reasonably assured. During the three-month periods ended March 31, 2008 and 2007, revenues were increased by the shortfall of such straight-line revenues over the amounts that were currently billable at the end of each period on such basis. The Company's water and energy fees for the three-month periods ended March 31 are as follows (in millions):

   
2008
   
2007
 
Water delivery fees
  $ 14.8     $ 14.8  
Guaranteed energy fees
    9.1       9.1  
Variable energy fees
    6.9       2.3  
Deferred water delivery fees
    (1.9 )     (1.9 )
Total lease rentals and service contracts revenue
  $ 28.9     $ 24.3  

Revenue increased by $4.6 million to $28.9 million for the three-month period ended March 31, 2008 from $24.3 million for the same period in 2007. The increase in variable energy fees was due to the higher rainfall which resulted in higher electricity production in the first quarter of 2008 as compared to 2007. The deferred water delivery fees represent the difference between the actual water delivery fees earned and water delivery fees invoiced pursuant to the Project Agreement.

Plant operations and other operating expenses increased by $0.4 million to $2.2 million for the three-month period ended March 31, 2008 from $1.8 million for the same period in 2007, due to higher general and administrative cost allocations in 2008.

Interest expense decreased by $1.6 million to $3.1 million for the three-month period ended March 31, 2008 from $4.7 million for the same period in 2007, due to lower outstanding debt balances resulting from the scheduled repayment of Series B bonds and payment of $12.1 million of subordinated debt.

Income tax expense increased by $6.3 million to $6.9 million for the three-month period ended March 31, 2008 from $0.6 million for the same period in 2007, due to the expiration of the income tax holiday on December 11, 2007. From December 11, 2007 forward, the Company’s taxable income is subject to income tax at the Philippine statutory rate.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

CE Casecnan developed, financed, constructed and owns and operates the Casecnan Project for the term of the Cooperation Period, which commenced on December 11, 2001. During the Cooperation Period, NIA is obligated to accept all deliveries of water and energy, and so long as the Casecnan Project is physically capable of operating and delivering in accordance with agreed levels set forth in the Project Agreement, NIA is obligated to pay CE Casecnan a fixed fee for the delivery of a threshold volume of water and a fixed fee for the delivery of a threshold amount of electricity. In addition, NIA is obligated to pay a fee for all electricity delivered in excess of the threshold amount up to a specified amount and will be obligated to pay a fee for all water delivered in excess of the threshold amount up to a specified amount beginning after December 25, 2008.

The ROP has provided a Performance Undertaking under which NIA’s obligations under the Project Agreement are guaranteed by the full faith and credit of the ROP. The Project Agreement and the Performance Undertaking provide for the resolution of disputes by binding arbitration in Singapore under international arbitration rules.
 
16


NIA’s obligations under the Project Agreement are substantially denominated in U.S. Dollars and are the Company’s sole source of operating revenue. Because of the Company’s dependence on NIA, any material failure of NIA to fulfill its obligations under the Project Agreement and any material failure of the ROP to fulfill its obligations under the Performance Undertaking would significantly impair the ability of the Company to meet its existing and future obligations, including obligations pertaining to its outstanding debt. No shareholders or affiliates of the Company, including MidAmerican, and no directors, officers or employees of the Company have guaranteed or will be in any way liable for payment of the Company’s obligations. As a result, payment of the Company’s obligations depends upon the availability of sufficient revenue from the Company’s business after the payment of operating expenses.

The Company’s cash and cash equivalents were $64.1 million and $31.1 million at March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively.

Cash flows from operations were $33.4 million and $25.4 million for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively. The increase in cash from operations in 2008 was primarily due to collection of higher variable energy revenue resulting from higher water flow and related energy generation in 2008.

Cash flows used in investing activities were $0.4 million and $15.9 million for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively. The Company made net purchases of $15.0 million of available-for-sale securities during the three-month period ended March 31, 2007.

Cash flows from financing activities were $- million and $0.6 million for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2008 and 2007. The Company accrued an additional $0.6 million payable to the minority shareholder in 2007.

Auction Rate Securities

With the liquidity issues experienced in global credit and capital markets, the $21.4 million par value of auction rate securities held by the Company at March 31, 2008 have experienced multiple failed auctions as the amount of securities submitted for sale has exceeded the amount of purchase orders. However, all these securities retain Moody’s Investors Service and Standard & Poor’s highest credit ratings at March 31, 2008.

Although there is no current liquid market for the auction rate securities, the Company believes the underlying creditworthiness of the repayment sources for these securities’ principal and interest has not materially deteriorated. Further, the Company has the intent and ability to hold the auction rate securities for a period of time sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery. At March 31, 2008, the Company recorded a pre-tax temporary impairment of the auction rate securities amounting to $1.8 million. If the underlying assets or guarantors experience further credit deterioration on the auction rate securities, the Company may not ultimately realize the par value of the investment at March 31, 2008.

Given the failed auctions, it is uncertain if the Company's auction rate securities will be sold within the next twelve months. Accordingly, the entire amount of such remaining balance has been classified as non-current assets on the Company's March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007 Balance Sheets.

17

 
Shareholder Litigation

Pursuant to the share ownership adjustment mechanism in the CE Casecnan shareholder agreement, which is based upon proforma financial projections of the Casecnan Project prepared following commencement of commercial operations, in February 2002, MEHC’s indirect wholly owned subsidiary, CE Casecnan Ltd., advised the minority shareholder of the Company, LaPrairie Group Contractors (International) Ltd. (“LPG”) that MEHC’s indirect ownership interest in CE Casecnan had increased to 100% effective from commencement of commercial operations. On July 8, 2002, LPG filed a complaint in the Superior Court of the State of California, City and County of San Francisco, against CE Casecnan Ltd. and MEHC. LPG’s complaint, as amended, seeks compensatory and punitive damages arising out of CE Casecnan Ltd.’s and MEHC’s alleged improper calculation of the proforma financial projections and alleged improper settlement of the NIA arbitration. The Company is not a defendant in the action. On January 3, 2006, the court entered a judgment in favor of LPG against CE Casecnan Ltd. Pursuant to the judgment, 15% of the distributions of the Company was deposited into escrow plus interest at 9% per annum. On February 21, 2007, the appellate court issued a decision, and as a result of the decision, CE Casecnan Ltd. determined that LPG would retain ownership of 10% of the shares of the Company, with the remaining 5% ownership being transferred to CE Casecnan Ltd. subject to certain buy-up rights under the shareholder agreement. Pursuant to the appellate court decision, on May 7, 2007, the Company released $21.7 million of dividends and $3.8 million of accrued interest from the dividend set aside account representing the 10% share to LPG while the remaining 5% share is still held in escrow. The parties have agreed to stipulate that the final calculation of the internal rate of return is 24.06%. At a hearing on October 10, 2007, the court determined that LPG was ready, willing and able to exercise its buy-up rights in 2007. Additional hearings were held on October 23 and 24, 2007, regarding the issue of the buy-up price calculation and a written decision was issued on February 4, 2008 specifying the method for determining LPG’s buy-up price. The court has scheduled a hearing for May 9, 2008, regarding the inclusion of certain tax considerations in the calculation of the buy-up price. Exercise of the buy-up rights under the shareholder agreement is a transaction between shareholders of the Company and is not expected to have any impact on the Company’s financial position or results of operations. LPG waived its request for a jury trial for the breach of fiduciary duty claim and the parties have entered into a stipulation which provides for a trial of such claim by the court based on the existing record of the case. The trial was held on April 23, 2008. The court took the matter under advisement and requested further briefs from the parties on the burden of proof to be applied. MEHC intends to vigorously defend and pursue the remaining claims.

In February 2003, San Lorenzo Ruiz Builders and Developers Group, Inc. (“San Lorenzo”), an original shareholder substantially all of whose shares in the Company were purchased by MEHC in 1998, threatened to initiate legal action against the Company in the Philippines in connection with certain aspects of its option to repurchase such shares. The Company believes that San Lorenzo has no valid basis for any claim and, if named as a defendant in any action that may be commenced by San Lorenzo, the Company will vigorously defend such action. On July 1, 2005, MEHC and CE Casecnan Ltd. commenced an action against San Lorenzo in the District Court of Douglas County, Nebraska, seeking a declaratory judgment as to MEHC’s and CE Casecnan Ltd.’s rights vis-à-vis San Lorenzo in respect of such shares. San Lorenzo filed a motion to dismiss on September 19, 2005. Subsequently, San Lorenzo purported to exercise its option to repurchase such shares. On January 30, 2006, San Lorenzo filed a counterclaim against MEHC and CE Casecnan Ltd. seeking declaratory relief that it has effectively exercised its option to purchase 15% of the shares of the Company, that it is the rightful owner of such shares and that it is due all dividends paid on such shares. On March 9, 2006, the court granted San Lorenzo’s motion to dismiss, but has since permitted MEHC and CE Casecnan Ltd. to file an amended complaint incorporating the purported exercise of the option. The complaint has been amended and the action is proceeding. Currently, the action is in the discovery phase and a one-week trial has been set to begin on November 3, 2008. The impact, if any, of San Lorenzo’s purported exercise of its option and the Nebraska litigation on the Company cannot be determined at this time.

Franchise Tax

CE Casecnan received franchise tax assessments for the years 2001 to 2006 totaling $2.2 million from the Province of Nueva Vizcaya. CE Casecnan believes that franchise tax is imposed on companies which have a secondary or special franchise from the government. CE Casecnan is an independent power producer and does not have a government franchise. The Electric Power Industry Reform Act of 2001 provides that independent power generation is not a public utility operation and does not require a franchise. Therefore, the Company has not recognized a liability relating to these assessments. CE Casecnan filed appeals of the assessments with the Regional Trial Court of Nueva Vizcaya. The appeals were referred to the Supreme Court Office of the Court Administrator and are currently pending.

Contractual Obligations and Commercial Commitments

Subsequent to December 31, 2007, there were no material changes outside the normal course of business in the contractual obligations and commercial commitments from the information provided in Item 7 of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007.

New Accounting Pronouncements

For a discussion of new accounting pronouncements affecting the Company, refer to Note 2 of Notes to Financial Statements included in Item 1 of this Form 10-Q.

18

 
Critical Accounting Policies

Certain accounting policies require management to make estimates and judgments concerning transactions that will be settled in the future. Amounts recognized in the financial statements from such estimates are necessarily based on numerous assumptions involving varying and potentially significant degrees of judgment and uncertainty. Accordingly, the amounts currently reflected in the financial statements will likely increase or decrease in the future as additional information becomes available. Estimates are used for, but not limited to, the allowance for doubtful accounts and revenue. For additional discussion of the Company’s critical accounting policies, see Item 7 of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007. The Company’s critical accounting policies have not changed materially since December 31, 2007.

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
 
For quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk affecting CE Casecnan, see Item 7A of CE Casecnan’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007. CE Casecnan’s exposure to market risk and its management of such risk has not changed materially since December 31, 2007.

Controls and Procedures

At the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, the Company carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s management, including the Chief Executive Officer (principal executive officer) and the Chief Financial Officer (principal financial officer), of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) promulgated under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended). Based upon that evaluation, the Company’s management, including the Chief Executive Officer (principal executive officer) and the Chief Financial Officer (principal financial officer), concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective in timely alerting them to material information relating to the Company required to be included in the Company’s periodic SEC filings. There has been no change in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended March 31, 2008 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.


 
19 

 

PART II – OTHER INFORMATION

Legal Proceedings

For a description of certain legal proceedings affecting the Company, refer to Item 3 of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007. Material developments to these proceedings during the three-month period ended March 31, 2008 are included in Note 6 of Notes to Financial Statements included in Item 1 of this Form 10-Q.

Risk Factors

There has been no material change to the Company’s risk factors from those disclosed in Item 1A of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007.

Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

Not applicable.

Defaults Upon Senior Securities

Not applicable.

Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

Not applicable.

Other Information

Not applicable.

Exhibits

The exhibits listed on the accompanying Exhibit Index are filed as part of this Quarterly Report.

 
20 

 




Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.



   
CE CASECNAN WATER AND ENERGY COMPANY, INC.
   
(Registrant)
     
     
     
     
     
Date: April 29, 2008
 
/s/ Patrick J. Goodman
   
Patrick J. Goodman
   
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
   
(principal financial and accounting officer)

 
21 

 



Exhibit No.
  Description
     
31.1
 
Principal Executive Officer Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
31.2
 
Principal Financial Officer Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.1
 
Principal Executive Officer Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.2
 
Principal Financial Officer Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

22 
EX-31.1 2 exh31-1.htm SECTION 302 CEO CERTIFICATION exh31-1.htm



EXHIBIT 31.1
 
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
  I, Joseph L. Sullivan, certify that:
 
1.
 
I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of CE Casecnan Water and Energy Company, Inc;
     
2.
 
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
     
3.
 
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
     
4.
 
The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
       
   
a)
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
       
   
b)
Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
       
   
c)
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
       
   
d)
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
   
5.
 
The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
   
   
a)
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
   
   
b)
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
 

Date: April 29, 2008
/s/ Joseph L. Sullivan
 
Joseph L. Sullivan
 
President
 
(principal executive officer)
 

EX-31.2 3 exh31-2.htm SECTION 302 CFO CERTIFICATION exh31-2.htm


 
EXHIBIT 31.2
 
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
I, Patrick J. Goodman, certify that:
 
1.
 
I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of CE Casecnan Water and Energy Company, Inc;
     
2.
 
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
     
3.
 
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
     
4.
 
The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
       
   
a)
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
       
   
b)
Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
       
   
c)
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
       
   
d)
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
   
5.
 
The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
   
   
a)
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
   
   
b)
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
 

Date: April 29, 2008
/s/ Patrick J. Goodman
 
Patrick J. Goodman
 
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
 
(principal financial officer)


EX-32.1 4 exh32-1.htm SECTION 906 CEO CERTIFICATION exh32-1.htm


EXHIBIT 32.1
 
 
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
I, Joseph L. Sullivan, President of CE Casecnan Water and Energy Company, Inc. (the “Company”), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of my knowledge:
 
(1)
 
the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2008 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
 
(2)
 
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
 
 
 
Date: April 29, 2008
/s/ Joseph L. Sullivan
 
Joseph L. Sullivan
 
President
 
(principal executive officer)


EX-32.2 5 exh32-2.htm SECTION 906 CFO CERTIFICATION exh32-2.htm


EXHIBIT 32.2
 
 
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
I, Patrick J. Goodman, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of CE Casecnan Water and Energy Company, Inc. (the “Company”), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of my knowledge:
 
(1)
 
the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2008 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
 
(2)
 
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
 
 
 
Date: April 29, 2008
/s/ Patrick J. Goodman
 
Patrick J. Goodman
 
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
 
(principal financial officer)
 
 


 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
-----END PRIVACY-ENHANCED MESSAGE-----