XML 20 R9.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.10.0.1
Basis of Presentation
9 Months Ended
Sep. 30, 2018
Basis of Presentation [Abstract]  
Basis of Presentation

2. Basis of Presentation



The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared pursuant to the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) and, in our opinion, include all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) necessary for a fair presentation of results of operations, financial position and cash flows as of the balance sheet dates presented and for the periods presented. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in annual financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”) have been condensed or omitted pursuant to SEC rules. We believe that the disclosures made are adequate to keep the information presented from being misleading. The results of operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2018 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year.



The December 31, 2017 balance sheet has been derived from the audited consolidated financial statements at that date. These condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements included in our latest Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC.



Discontinued Operations



On November 2, 2012, pursuant to the purchase agreement (the “Purchase Agreement”), dated as of June 26, 2012, as amended on October 30, 2012 and March 28, 2013, by and among Loral, Space Systems/Loral, LLC (formerly known as Space Systems/Loral, Inc.) (“SSL”), MacDonald, Dettwiler and Associates Ltd. (“MDA”) and MDA Communications Holdings, Inc. (“MDA Holdings”), a subsidiary of MDA, Loral completed the sale of SSL (the “SSL Sale”), its wholly‑owned subsidiary, to MDA Holdings.

 

Interest and other expenses that are directly related to the SSL Sale are classified as discontinued operations in the statements of operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2018 and 2017.



Investments in Affiliates



Our ownership interest in Telesat is accounted for using the equity method of accounting. Income and losses of Telesat are recorded based on our economic interest. Our equity in net income or loss of Telesat also reflects amortization of profits eliminated, to the extent of our economic interest in Telesat, on satellites we constructed for them while we owned SSL and on Loral’s sale to Telesat in April 2011 of its portion of the payload on the ViaSat-1 satellite and related assets. Non-refundable cash distributions received from Telesat in excess of our initial investment and our share of cumulative equity in comprehensive income of Telesat, net of cash distributions received in prior periods, are recorded as equity in net income of Telesat (“Excess Cash Distribution”) since we have no obligation to provide future financial support to Telesat. After receiving an Excess Cash Distribution, we do not record additional equity in net income of Telesat until our share of Telesat’s future net income exceeds the Excess Cash Distribution. Equity in losses of affiliates is not recognized after the carrying value of an investment, including advances and loans, has been reduced to zero, unless guarantees or other funding obligations exist. We had no guarantees or other funding obligations for our equity method investments as of September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017. We use the nature of distribution approach to classify distributions from equity method investments on the statements of cash flows. The Company monitors its equity method investments for factors indicating other-than-temporary impairment. An impairment loss is recognized when there has been a loss in value of the affiliate that is other‑than-temporary.



Use of Estimates in Preparation of Financial Statements



The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the amount of income (loss) reported for the period. Actual results could materially differ from estimates.



Significant estimates also included the allowances for doubtful accounts, income taxes, including the valuation of deferred tax assets, the fair value of liabilities indemnified, the dilutive effect of Telesat stock options (see Note 10) and our pension liabilities.



Cash, Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash



As of September 30, 2018, the Company had $248.9 million of cash and cash equivalents. Cash and cash equivalents include liquid investments, primarily money market funds, with maturities of less than 90 days at the time of purchase. Management determines the appropriate classification of its investments at the time of purchase and at each balance sheet date.



As of September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, the Company had restricted cash of $0.3 million. The restricted cash of $0.3 million represents the amount pledged as collateral to the issuer of a standby letter of credit (the “LC”). The LC, which expires in October 2018 and contains an automatic renewal period of one year, has been provided as a guaranty to the lessor of our corporate offices.



The following table provides a reconciliation of cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash reported within the condensed consolidated balance sheet to the condensed consolidated statement of cash flows (in thousands):





 

 

 

 

 



September 30,

 

December 31,



2018

 

2017

Cash and cash equivalents

$

248,904 

 

 

255,139 

Restricted cash included in current assets

 

304 

 

 

Restricted cash included in other assets

 

 

 

304 

Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash shown in the statement of cash flows

$

249,208 

 

 

255,443 









Concentration of Credit Risk



Financial instruments which potentially subject us to concentrations of credit risk consist principally of cash and cash equivalents and receivables. Our cash and cash equivalents are maintained with high-credit-quality financial institutions. As of September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, our cash and cash equivalents were invested primarily in several liquid Prime and Government AAA money market funds. Such funds are not insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. The dispersion across funds reduces the exposure of a default at any one fund.  As a result, management believes that its potential credit risks are minimal.



Fair Value Measurements



U.S. GAAP defines fair value as the price that would be received for an asset or the exit price that would be paid to transfer a liability in the principal or most advantageous market in an orderly transaction between market participants. U.S. GAAP also establishes a fair value hierarchy that gives the highest priority to observable inputs and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs. The three levels of the fair value hierarchy are described below:



Level 1: Inputs represent a fair value that is derived from unadjusted quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities traded in active markets at the measurement date.



Level 2: Inputs represent a fair value that is derived from quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active, model-based valuation techniques for which all significant assumptions are observable in the market or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities, and pricing inputs, other than quoted prices in active markets included in Level 1, which are either directly or indirectly observable as of the reporting date.



Level 3: Inputs are generally unobservable and typically reflect management’s estimates of assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability. The fair values are therefore determined using model-based techniques that include option pricing models, discounted cash flow models, and similar techniques.



Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value



The following table presents our assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring and non-recurring basis (in thousands):



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



September 30, 2018

 

December 31, 2017

 

Level 1

 

Level 2

 

Level 3

 

Level 1

 

Level 2

 

Level 3

Assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Money market funds

$

247,237 

 

$

         —

 

$

         —

 

$

251,742 

 

$

         —

 

$

         —

Other current assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Indemnification - Sale of SSL

 

         —

 

 

         —

 

 

2,410 

 

 

         —

 

 

         —

 

 

2,410 

Liabilities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Indemnification - Globalstar do Brasil S.A.

$

         —

 

$

         —

 

$

190 

 

$

         —

 

$

         —

 

$

293 



The carrying amount of money market funds approximates fair value as of each reporting date because of the short maturity of those instruments.



The Company did not have any non-financial assets or non-financial liabilities that were recognized or disclosed at fair value as of September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017.



Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Non-recurring Basis



We review the carrying values of our equity method investments when events and circumstances warrant and consider all available evidence in evaluating when declines in fair value are other-than-temporary. The fair values of our investments are determined based on valuation techniques using the best information available and may include quoted market prices, market comparables and discounted cash flow projections. An impairment charge is recorded when the carrying amount of the investment exceeds its current fair value and is determined to be other-than-temporary.



The asset resulting from the indemnification of SSL is for certain pre-closing taxes and reflects the excess of payments since inception over the estimated liability, which was originally determined using the fair value objective approach. The estimated liability for indemnifications relating to Globalstar do Brasil S.A. (“GdB”), originally determined using expected value analysis, is net of payments since inception.



Contingencies



Contingencies by their nature relate to uncertainties that require management to exercise judgment both in assessing the likelihood that a liability has been incurred as well as in estimating the amount of potential loss, if any. We accrue for costs relating to litigation, claims and other contingent matters when such liabilities become probable and reasonably estimable. Such estimates may be based on advice from third parties or on management’s judgment, as appropriate. Actual amounts paid may differ from amounts estimated, and such differences will be charged to operations in the period in which the final determination of the liability is made.



Income Taxes



Loral and its subsidiaries are subject to U.S. federal, state and local income taxation on their worldwide income and foreign taxation on certain income from sources outside the United States. Telesat is subject to tax in Canada and other jurisdictions, and Loral will provide in operating earnings any additional U.S. current and deferred tax required on distributions received or deemed to be received from Telesat. Deferred income taxes reflect the future tax effect of temporary differences between the carrying amount of assets and liabilities for financial and income tax reporting and are measured by applying anticipated statutory tax rates in effect for the year during which the differences are expected to reverse. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance to the extent it is more likely than not that the deferred tax assets will not be realized.



The tax benefit of an uncertain tax position (“UTP”) taken or expected to be taken in income tax returns is recognized only if it is “more likely than not” to be sustained on examination by the taxing authorities, based on its technical merits as of the reporting date. The tax benefit recognized in the financial statements from such a position is measured based on the largest benefit that has a greater than fifty percent likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement. The Company recognizes interest and penalties related to income taxes in income tax expense on a quarterly basis.



The unrecognized tax benefit of a UTP is recognized in the period when the UTP is effectively settled. A previously recognized tax position is derecognized in the first period in which it is no longer more likely than not that such tax position would be sustained upon examination.



Earnings per Share



Basic earnings per share are computed based upon the weighted average number of shares of voting and non-voting common stock outstanding during each period. Shares of non-voting common stock are in all respects identical to and treated equally with shares of voting common stock except for the absence of voting rights (other than as provided in Loral’s Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation which was ratified by Loral’s stockholders on May 19, 2009). Diluted earnings per share are based on the weighted average number of shares of voting and non-voting common stock outstanding during each period, adjusted for the effect of unvested or unconverted restricted stock units. For diluted earnings per share, earnings are adjusted for the dilutive effect of Telesat stock options.



Recent Accounting Pronouncements



In August 2018, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2018-14, Compensation-Retirement Benefits-Defined Benefit Plans-General (Subtopic 715-20): Disclosure Framework – Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Defined Benefit Plans. The amendments in ASU No. 2018-14 remove certain disclosures that are no longer considered cost beneficial, clarify the specific requirements of certain disclosures, and add disclosure requirements identified as relevant to improve effectiveness of disclosures related to employer sponsored defined benefit or other postretirement plans. The new guidance is effective for the Company on January 1, 2021, with earlier application permitted in any interim or annual period. The amendments in this ASU are to be applied on a retrospective basis to all periods presented. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of the new guidance on its condensed consolidated financial statements



In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU No. 2018-13, Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820): Disclosure Framework – Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Fair Value Measurement. ASU No. 2018-13 eliminates, amends, and adds disclosure requirements to improve the effectiveness of fair value measurement disclosures. The new guidance is effective for the Company on January 1, 2020, with earlier application permitted in any interim or annual period. Companies may also choose to early adopt the eliminated and amended disclosures and wait to adopt the new disclosures until the effective date of the new guidance. While certain amendments are to be applied prospectively, all other amendments are to be applied retrospectively to all periods presented. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of the new guidance on its condensed consolidated financial statements.  



In February 2018, the FASB issued ASU No. 2018-02, Reclassification of Certain Tax Effects from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income. On December 22, 2017, Public Law 115-97, known as the “Tax Cuts and Jobs Act” was signed into law. Among other things, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act permanently reduced the U.S. federal corporate income tax rate from 35 percent to 21 percent effective for tax years commencing January 1, 2018. According to ASU 2018-02, an entity may elect either to (a) reclassify from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) to retained earnings the stranded income tax effects of the federal tax rate change (the “Reclassification”) or (b) provide certain disclosures. The new guidance is effective for the Company on January 1, 2019, with earlier adoption permitted in any interim or annual period. The amendments in this update are to be applied either in the period of adoption or retrospectively to each period in which the effect of the tax rate change is recognized.  The Company early adopted the new guidance in the fourth quarter of 2017 and elected the Reclassification approach. As a result of adopting the new guidance, we reclassified $4.5 million of stranded deferred federal income tax benefits from accumulated other comprehensive loss to accumulated deficit in the fourth quarter of 2017 related to the change in the federal corporate income tax rate.



In March 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-07, Improving the Presentation of Net Periodic Pension Cost and Net Periodic Postretirement Benefit Cost. ASU No. 2017-07, as it applies to the Company, amended the presentation of net periodic pension and postretirement cost (i.e. net benefit cost). The new guidance requires the service cost component to be presented separate from the non-service cost components of net benefit cost. While the service cost will be presented with other employee compensation costs within operations, the non-service cost components of net benefit cost, such as interest cost, amortization of prior service cost, and gains or losses, are required to be separately presented outside of operations, if income or loss from operations is presented. The guidance, to be applied retrospectively, is effective for the Company on January 1, 2018. Adoption of the new guidance on January 1, 2018, with retrospective effect, required us to restate the condensed consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income for the prior-period presented. Accordingly, for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017, of the net benefit cost of $0.4 million and $1.2 million, respectively, we reclassified the non-service cost components of $0.2 million and $0.7 million, respectively, from general and administrative expenses to other expense. Adoption of the new guidance did not affect previously reported financial position, earnings per share, or cash flows.



In February 2016, the FASB amended the ASC by creating ASC Topic 842, Leases. ASC Topic 842 requires a lessee to record a right-of-use asset and a lease liability for all leases with a lease term greater than 12 months. The main difference between previous U.S. GAAP and ASC Topic 842 is the recognition under ASC 842 of lease assets and lease liabilities by lessees for those leases classified as operating leases under previous U.S. GAAP. The new guidance, effective for the Company on January 1, 2019, with earlier application permitted, is not expected to have a material effect on our condensed consolidated financial statements.



Additional Cash Flow Information



The following represents non-cash activities and supplemental information to the condensed consolidated statements of cash flows (in thousands):







 

 

 

 

 

 

Nine Months Ended



September 30,

 

2018

 

2017

Non-cash operating items:

 

 

 

 

 

Equity in net income of affiliates

$

(56,734)

 

$

(183,086)

Deferred taxes

 

(1,237)

 

 

26,655 

Depreciation and amortization

 

16 

 

 

33 

Amortization of prior service credit and actuarial loss

 

797 

 

 

770 

Net non-cash operating items – continuing operations

$

(57,158)

 

$

(155,628)

Supplemental information:

 

 

 

 

 

Interest paid – continuing operations

$

17 

 

$

22 

Interest paid – discontinued operations

$

         —

 

$

55 

Tax (refunds) payments, net - continuing operations

$

(55)

 

$

10,038 

0