SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the

Securities Exchange Act of 1934

Filed by the Registrant  x                             Filed by a party other than the Registrant  ¨

Check the appropriate box:

¨ Preliminary Proxy Statement

¨ Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))

x Definitive Proxy Statement

¨ Definitive Additional Materials

¨ Soliciting Material Pursuant to Rule 14a-12

IRIDEX CORPORATION

(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

x	No fee required.
¨	Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.
	1)	Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:
	2)	Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:
	3)	Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):
	4)	Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:
	5)	Total fee paid:
¨	Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.
¨	Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.
	1)	Amount previously paid:
	2)	Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:
	3)	Filing party:
	4)	Date Filed:

IRIDEX CORPORATION

NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

To Be Held on June 15, 2016

TO THE STOCKHOLDERS:

NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Annual Meeting of Stockholders of IRIDEX Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), will be held on June 15, 2016 at 10:00 a.m., Pacific time, at the Company’s principal executive offices located at 1212 Terra Bella Avenue, Mountain View, California 94043 for the following purposes:

1. To elect five (5) directors to serve for the ensuing year or until their successors are elected and qualified (Proposal One);

2. To ratify the appointment of Burr Pilger Mayer, Inc. as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal year 2016 ending December 31, 2016 (Proposal Two);

3. To hold a non-binding vote to approve the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers (Proposal Three); and

4. To transact such other business as may properly be brought before the meeting and any adjournment(s) or postponement(s) thereof.

Stockholders of record at the close of business on April 18, 2016 shall be entitled to notice of and to vote at the Annual Meeting.

All stockholders are cordially invited to attend the meeting. However, to ensure your representation at the Annual Meeting, please vote as soon as possible using one of the following methods: (1) by using the Internet as instructed on the enclosed proxy card, (2) by telephone by calling the toll-free number as instructed on the enclosed proxy card or (3) by mail by completing, signing, dating and returning the enclosed paper proxy card in the postage-prepaid envelope enclosed for that purpose. Any stockholder attending the meeting may vote in person even if he, she or it has previously voted using the Internet, telephone or proxy card. If you wish to attend the meeting to vote in person and need directions, please contact Investor Relations at (650) 940-4700 or slbruce@iridex.com.

	By Order of the Board of Directors of IRIDEX Corporation,
Mountain View, California	William M. Moore
May 5, 2016	Chairman of the Board of Directors; President and Chief Executive Officer

YOUR VOTE IS IMPORTANT

IN ORDER TO ENSURE YOUR REPRESENTATION AT THE ANNUAL MEETING, WHETHER
OR NOT YOU PLAN TO ATTEND THE ANNUAL MEETING, PLEASE VOTE BY (1) USING
THE INTERNET AS INSTRUCTED ON THE PROXY CARD OR THE NOTICE OF INTERNET
AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIALS, (2) TELEPHONE OR (3) COMPLETING AND
RETURNING THE ENCLOSED PROXY CARD AS PROMPTLY AS POSSIBLE IN THE
ENCLOSED ENVELOPE.

IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING THE AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIALS FOR THE

STOCKHOLDER MEETING TO BE HELD ON JUNE 15, 2016

The Proxy Statement and Annual Report on Form 10-K

are available at www.edocumentview.com/irix

IRIDEX CORPORATION

1212 Terra Bella Avenue

Mountain View, CA 94043

PROXY STATEMENT

FOR THE 2016 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

INFORMATION CONCERNING SOLICITATION AND VOTING

General

The accompanying Proxy is solicited on behalf of the Board of Directors (the “Board”) of IRIDEX Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the “Company” or “IRIDEX”), for use at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the “Annual Meeting”) to be held at the principal executive offices of the Company located at 1212 Terra Bella Avenue, Mountain View, California 94043 on June 15, 2016, at 10:00 a.m., Pacific time, and at any adjournment(s) or postponement(s) thereof, for the purposes set forth herein and in the accompanying Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders. The Company’s telephone number is (650) 940-4700.

The Notice of Internet Availability (the “Internet Notice”) was first mailed on or about May 5, 2016 to stockholders of record as of April 18, 2016, and these proxy solicitation materials and the Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal year 2015 ended January 2, 2016, including financial statements (the “Form 10-K”), were first made available to you on the Internet, on or about May 5, 2016. We maintain a website at www.iridex.com. The information on our website is not a part of this proxy statement.

Record Date and Share Ownership

Stockholders of record at the close of business on April 18, 2016 (the “Record Date”) are entitled to notice of and to vote at the meeting and at any adjournment(s) or postponement(s) thereof. At the Record Date, 10,063,602 shares of the Company’s common stock, par value $0.01 per share (“Common Stock”), were issued and outstanding and held of record by approximately 43 stockholders.

Internet Notice

Pursuant to the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission, we have provided access to our proxy materials over the Internet. Accordingly, the Internet Notice has been sent to our stockholders of record and beneficial owners as of the Record Date. Instructions on how to access the proxy materials over the Internet or to request a printed copy by mail may be found on the Internet Notice. In addition, the Internet Notice provides information on how stockholders may request to receive proxy materials in printed form by mail or electronically by email on an ongoing basis.

By accessing the proxy materials on the Internet or choosing to receive your future proxy materials by email, you will save us the cost of printing and mailing documents to you and will reduce the impact of our annual stockholders’ meetings on the environment. If you choose to receive future proxy materials by email, you will receive an email next year with instructions containing a link to those materials and a link to the proxy voting site. If you choose to receive future proxy materials by mail, you will receive a paper copy of those materials, including a form of proxy. Your election to receive proxy materials by mail or email will remain in effect until you notify us that you are terminating your request.

Voting

Each stockholder is entitled to one vote for each share of Common Stock held by such stockholder. Holders of Common Stock are the only security holders of the Company entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting. The stockholders may not cumulate votes in the election of directors.

Whether you hold shares directly as the stockholder of record or beneficially in street name, you may direct how your shares are voted without attending the Annual Meeting. If you are a stockholder of record, you may vote by submitting a proxy. If you hold shares beneficially in street name, you may vote by submitting voting instructions to your broker, trustee or nominee. For instructions on how to vote, please refer to the instructions below and those included on your proxy card or Internet Notice or, for shares held beneficially in street name, the voting instructions provided to you by your broker, trustee or nominee.

By mail—Stockholders of record of Common Stock may submit proxies by completing, signing and dating their proxy cards and mailing them in the accompanying pre-addressed envelopes. Proxy cards submitted by mail must be received by the time of the meeting in order for your shares to be voted. IRIDEX stockholders who hold shares beneficially in street name may vote by mail by completing, signing and dating the voting instructions provided by their brokers, trustees or nominees and mailing them in the accompanying pre-addressed envelopes.

By Internet—Stockholders of record of Common Stock may submit proxies online by following the “Vote by Internet” instructions on their proxy cards or Internet Notice until 1:00 a.m., Central time, on June 15, 2016. Most IRIDEX stockholders who hold shares beneficially in street name may vote by accessing the web site specified in the voting instructions provided by their brokers, trustees or nominees. Please check the voting instructions for Internet voting availability.

By telephone—Stockholders of record of Common Stock who live in the United States or Canada may submit proxies by following the “Vote by Telephone” instructions on their proxy cards until 1:00 a.m., Central time, on June 15, 2016. Most IRIDEX stockholders who hold shares beneficially in street name may vote by phone by calling the number specified in the voting instructions provided by their brokers, trustees or nominees. Please check the voting instructions for telephone voting availability.

Revocability of Proxies

Any proxy given pursuant to this solicitation may be revoked by the person giving it at any time before its use by (a) delivering to the Company at its principal offices to the attention of the Company’s Vice President and Controller a written notice of revocation or a duly executed proxy bearing a later date or (b) attending the meeting and voting in person.

Solicitation of Proxies

The cost of this solicitation will be borne by the Company. The Company may reimburse brokerage firms and other persons representing beneficial owners of shares for their expenses in forwarding solicitation material to such beneficial owners. Proxies may also be solicited by certain of the Company’s directors, officers and regular employees, without additional compensation, personally or by telephone or other electronic means. We have engaged The Proxy Advisory Group, LLC^®, to assist in the solicitation of proxies and provide related advice and informational support, for an estimated fee of $10,000 plus customary reimbursements.

Quorum; Abstentions; Broker Non-Votes

Votes cast by a properly submitted proxy card, by telephone, by the Internet or in person at the Annual Meeting will be tabulated by the Inspector of Elections (the “Inspector”). Holders of a majority of shares entitled to vote must be present at the meeting, represented by a properly submitted proxy card, voted by telephone or voted by the Internet in order for a quorum to exist. Except with respect to Proposal One, the Election of Directors, which will be decided by a plurality vote of the votes duly cast at a duly held meeting at which a quorum is present, the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes duly cast at a duly held meeting at which a quorum is present is required under Delaware law and the Company’s Bylaws for approval of all Proposals presented to stockholders.

2

Shares that are timely voted by telephone, the Internet or a properly dated, executed and returned proxy card will be voted at the Annual Meeting in accordance with the instructions of the stockholder. If no specific instructions are given, the shares will be voted (i) FOR the election of the nominees for directors set forth herein; (ii) FOR the ratification of Burr Pilger Mayer, Inc. as the independent registered public accounting firm of the Company for fiscal year 2016 ending December 31, 2016; (iii) FOR the non-binding stockholder approval of compensation of the Company’s named executive officers; and (iv) in the proxy holder’s discretion, upon such other business as may properly come before the Annual Meeting or any adjournment thereof.

Pursuant to Delaware law, the Inspector will treat shares that are voted “FOR,” “AGAINST,” “WITHHELD” or “ABSTAIN” as being present and entitled to vote for purposes of determining the presence of a quorum and as shares entitled to vote (the “Votes Cast”) on the subject matter at the Annual Meeting with respect to such matter. With respect to broker non-votes, although broker non-votes will be counted for purposes of determining the presence or absence of a quorum for the transaction of business, broker non-votes will not be counted for purposes of determining the number of Votes Cast with respect to the particular proposal on which the broker has expressly not voted and, accordingly, will not affect the determination as to whether the requisite majority of Votes Cast has been obtained with respect to a particular matter.

If you hold your shares through a broker, bank or other nominee and you do not instruct them how to vote, your broker, bank or other nominee may have authority to vote your shares on your behalf. If you hold your Common Stock through a broker and you do not instruct your broker how to vote on Proposals 1 and 3, it will be considered a broker non-vote and no votes will be cast on your behalf with respect to such Proposal(s). Your broker will continue to have discretion to vote any uninstructed shares on Proposal 2, the ratification of the appointment of the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm.

Deadline for Receipt of Stockholder Proposals to be Presented at the Next Annual Meeting

Stockholders of the Company may submit proposals on matters appropriate for stockholder action at meetings of the Company’s stockholders, including nominations for the election of directors, in accordance with Rule 14a-8 promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). All proposals by any stockholder to be presented at the 2017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders must be received by the Company at its principal executive offices, attention: Secretary, no later than January 5, 2017 and must otherwise be in compliance with applicable laws and regulations in order to be considered for inclusion in the proxy statement and form of proxy relating to that meeting.

In addition, the Company’s Bylaws establish an advance notice procedure with regard to certain matters, including stockholder proposals not included in the Company’s proxy statement, to be brought before an annual meeting of stockholders. To be properly brought before an annual meeting of stockholders outside the processes of Rule 14a-8, notice of nominations for the election of directors or other business proposals must be delivered in writing to the Secretary of the Company at the principal executive offices of the Company no less than 45 days, nor more than 120 days, prior to the date on which the Company first mailed its proxy materials for the prior year’s annual meeting. However, in the event that the date of the 2017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders is advanced by more than 30 days or delayed by more than 30 days (other than as a result of adjournment) after the one year anniversary of the 2016 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, notice by a stockholder to be timely must be delivered in writing not later than the close of business on the later of (i) the 60^th day prior to such annual meeting or (ii) the 10^th day after the day on which a public announcement of the date of such meeting is first made.

If a stockholder intends to submit a proposal at the Company’s 2017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders which is not eligible for inclusion in the proxy statement relating to the meeting, and the stockholder fails to give the Company notice of the proposal on or prior to January 5, 2017 and in accordance with the requirements set forth in the Exchange Act, then the proxy holders will be allowed to use their discretionary authority with regard to proxies delivered in connection with the 2017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders when and if the proposal is raised at the Company’s 2017 Annual Meeting.

3

Stockholder Information

A copy of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal year 2015 ended January 2, 2016, including the consolidated financial statements, is available to you on the Internet at www.iridex.com. The information on our website is not a part of this proxy statement. In compliance with Rule 14a-3 promulgated under the Exchange Act, the Company hereby undertakes to provide without charge to each person, upon written request, a copy of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal year 2015 ended January 2, 2016, not including exhibits. If a stockholder prefers a copy of the Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal year 2015 ended January 2, 2016 including exhibits, the stockholder will be charged a reasonable fee (which shall be limited to our reasonable expenses in furnishing such exhibits). Requests for such copies should be directed to IRIDEX Corporation, 1212 Terra Bella Avenue, Mountain View, California 94043, Attention: Investor Relations.

If you share an address with another stockholder, you may receive only one set of proxy materials (including our Annual Report on Form 10-K and proxy statement) unless you have previously provided contrary instructions. If you wish to receive a separate set of proxy materials, please request the additional copies by contacting us as instructed in the previous sentence, or by contacting our Investor Relations Department at (650) 940-4700. Similarly, if you share an address with another stockholder and have received multiple copies of our proxy materials, you may contact us at the address or telephone number specified above to request that only a single copy of these materials be delivered to your address in the future.

IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING THE AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIALS FOR THE ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS TO BE HELD ON June 15, 2016

The Internet Notice, these proxy solicitation materials, and the Form 10-K are available at www.edocumentview.com/irix. You are encouraged to access and review all of the important information contained in the proxy materials before voting.

4

PROPOSAL ONE

ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

Nominees

The Nominating and Governance Committee has nominated five (5) individuals to be elected at the Annual Meeting, all of whom are presently directors of the Company. Each nominee has consented to be named as a nominee in this Proxy Statement and to continue to serve as a director if elected. Should any nominee become unable or decline to serve as a director or should additional persons be nominated at the Annual Meeting, the proxy holders intend to vote all proxies received by them in such a manner as will assure the election of as many nominees listed below as possible (or, if new nominees have been designated by the Board, in such a manner as to elect such nominees) and the specific nominees to be voted for will be determined by the proxy holders. The Company is not aware of any reason that any nominee will be unable or will decline to serve as a director or that any additional persons will be nominated at the Annual Meeting. Each director elected at the Annual Meeting will serve until the next Annual Meeting of Stockholders or until such director’s successor has been elected and qualified.

Pursuant to provisions of the Securities Purchase Agreement by and between the Company and BlueLine Capital Partners (“BlueLine”), dated August 31, 2007, BlueLine has the right to designate one individual for appointment to the Company’s Board. Mr. Scott A. Shuda is BlueLine’s current designee. BlueLine’s right to designate a member of the Company’s Board is subject to termination in the event that BlueLine and its affiliates hold fewer than 500,000 shares of Common Stock. There are no other arrangements or understandings between any director or executive officer and any other person pursuant to which such director or officer is or was to be selected as a director or officer of the Company. There is no family relationship between any director or executive officer of the Company.

The names of, and certain information regarding, the nominees, as of May 5, 2016 are set forth below:

Name of Nominee	Age		Principal Occupation	Director Since
William M. Moore		67	Chairman of the Board of Directors; President and Chief Executive Officer of IRIDEX Corporation		2007
Sanford Fitch(1)(2)(3)(4)		75	Independent Consultant		2004
Ruediger Naumann-Etienne, Ph.D.(1)(2)(4)(5)		69	Managing Director of Intertec Group		2009
Scott A. Shuda(1)(4)(5)		50	Managing Director of BlueLine Partners, LLC		2012
George Marcellino, Ph.D.(1)(2)(4)		67	Co-founder and Vice President of Clinical Sciences and Global Advocacy of OptiMedica Corporation		2014

(1) The Board has made the affirmative determination that such nominee is independent as defined under the listing standards of The Nasdaq Stock Market.

(2) Member of the Audit Committee.

(3) Audit Committee financial expert as defined in the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission.

(4) Member of the Compensation Committee.

(5) Member of the Nominating and Governance Committee.

William M. Moore currently serves as the Chairman of the Company’s Board of Directors and as the President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company. He has served as a director of the Company since September 2007, as Chairman of the Company’s Board of Directors since September 2010, and as the President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company since August 2012. Mr. Moore served as a member of the Company’s Compensation Committee from September 2007 to July 2010, and as the Chairman of the Company’s Nominating and Governance Committee from February 2009 to October 2012. Mr. Moore also

5

currently serves on the board of directors of Natus Medical Incorporated, a public company he co-founded in 1990 and for which he served as CEO until 1993. Natus Medical Incorporated is a provider of healthcare products used for the screening, detection, treatment, monitoring and tracking of common medical ailments such as hearing impairment, neurological dysfunction, epilepsy, sleep disorders, and certain newborn conditions. Mr. Moore served as a consultant to BlueLine Partners, a private equity firm, from February 2004 until June 2008. From February 2008 to June 2010, Mr. Moore served on the board of directors of Urologix, Inc., a public company that develops, manufactures and markets minimally invasive medical products for the treatment of urological disorders. Mr. Moore brings to the board current operational experience, along with over twenty five years of experience in the healthcare industry. Mr. Moore firmly understands the Company’s business and technology. Mr. Moore’s past service on the boards of directors of four public companies, including his service on audit, compensation and nominating and governance committees, as well as his experience as an investor, provides him the strong background in understanding the qualifications for board members necessary to serve as our Chairman and President and Chief Executive Officer.

Sanford Fitch has served as a director of the Company since 2004. Mr. Fitch has served as a director and Audit Committee Chairman of Masimo Corp, a public company that designs, develops, manufactures and sells medical devices, since November 2006. Mr. Fitch also currently serves as a director of Ozone International, Inc., a privately held technology company. Mr. Fitch served as a director and Audit Committee Chairman of Foxhollow Technologies, Inc., a public company that designed, developed, manufactured and sold medical devices, from June 2004 until October 2007. He also served as a director and Audit Committee Chairman of Conceptus Inc., a public medical device company, from December 1994 until April 2004. Mr. Fitch was Chief Financial Officer and Senior Vice President of Operations of Conceptus from December 1994 through October 1998 and took the company public in 1996. Mr. Fitch also served as Chief Financial Officer of several start-up technology companies from 1998 until 2002. From December 1990 to January 1994, Mr. Fitch served as Chief Financial Officer of SanDisk Corp., a manufacturer of flash memory devices. From 1983 through 1989, Mr. Fitch was the Chief Financial Officer of Komag Inc., a manufacturer of rigid thin film media for the disk drive industry, and took the company public in 1987. Mr. Fitch holds a B.S. in Chemistry and an M.B.A. from Stanford University.

Mr. Fitch is independent and has extensive experience in the medical device industry. Mr. Fitch’s executive management and past board service have provided him with leadership and technical skills to firmly understand IRIDEX’s business. His background in finance, years of service on audit committees, and track record as an accomplished financial executive have provided Mr. Fitch with the financial acumen and skills necessary to serve as our Audit Committee financial expert and as chairman of our Audit Committee and the executive compensation experience necessary to serve on our Compensation Committee.

Ruediger Naumann-Etienne, Ph.D. has served as a director of the Company since December 2009. Dr. Naumann-Etienne has been the owner and Managing Director of Intertec Group, an investment company specializing in the medical device field, since 1989. He was Chairman of Cardiac Science Corporation from 2006 until the company was sold to Opto Electronics of India in 2010. From 2000 to 2005, Dr. Naumann-Etienne served as Chairman and from 2000 to 2003 as Chief Executive Officer of Quinton Cardiology Systems, one of the predecessor companies of Cardiac Science. From 1993 until 1999, Dr. Naumann-Etienne was Chairman of OEC Medical Systems, a manufacturer of fluoroscopic imaging systems and from 1987 to 1990 he was President and Chief Operating Officer of Diasonics, a manufacturer of diagnostic imaging equipment. Dr. Naumann-Etienne has served on the board of directors of Varian Medical Systems, Inc., a public medical device company, since 2003, and Encision Inc., a public medical device company, since October 2008. Dr. Naumann-Etienne also served as a director of Cardiac Science Corporation, a public medical device company, from September 2005 until December 2010, and Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc., a public life science company, from October 2003 until December 2009. Dr. Naumann-Etienne holds a Ph.D. in International Finance from the University of Michigan. He holds a Master’s Degree in Industrial Management from the Georgia Institute of Technology and holds an undergraduate degree in Business Administration from the Technical University Berlin, Germany.

Dr. Naumann-Etienne is independent and has extensive experience in the medical device industry. His experience as an executive of multiple medical device companies has provided Dr. Naumann-Etienne with an

6

understanding of the operation and management of a global medical device company, and with the business and technology of IRIDEX. His service on the boards of directors of several public companies has provided Dr. Naumann-Etienne with consensus-building skills and a functional understanding of the role of the board of directors. His education and his experience serving on the compensation committees of Varian Medical Systems and Encision have provided Dr. Naumann-Etienne the financial acumen and executive compensation experience necessary to serve as chairman of our Nominating and Governance Committee and on our Audit Committee and our Compensation Committee.

Scott A. Shuda has served as a director of the Company since December 2012. Mr. Shuda is the Managing Director and Co-founder of BlueLine Partners, LLC, an investment firm that focuses on publicly listed technology and healthcare companies. Mr. Shuda served as a director and Audit Committee member of MGC Diagnostics Corporation (formerly Angeion Corporation), a global medical technology company from 2010 to 2011. Prior to co-founding BlueLine Partners in April 2004, Mr. Shuda was General Counsel to Vicinity Corporation, an internet search company that went public in 2000 and was acquired by Microsoft in 2002. Prior to his employment with Vicinity, Mr. Shuda practiced law in California and New York, most recently in the Silicon Valley office of Latham & Watkins LLP. Mr. Shuda holds a J.D. from Georgetown University and an M.B.A. from Georgetown University.

Mr. Shuda is independent and has extensive experience with the medical devices industry. He brings more than a decade of professional experience in law, technology and entrepreneurial endeavors in the industry, including transactions that range from initial public offerings and venture financings to mergers and acquisitions. Mr. Shuda’s background as a corporate finance attorney, general counsel of a public company, and managing director of a private investment fund focusing on healthcare companies provides the Company with a strong perspective on the capital markets, a deep understanding of the challenges facing small public companies and the perspective of our stockholders. Mr. Shuda’s education and experience have provided Mr. Shuda with the executive compensation experience necessary to serve as chairman of our Compensation Committee and on our Nominating and Governance Committee.

George Marcellino, Ph.D. has served as a director of the Company since December 2014. Dr. Marcellino is the co-founder of OptiMedica Corporation, an ophthalmic device company that focuses on developing performance-driven technologies for ophthalmic care, where he has served as Vice President of Clinical Sciences and Global Advocacy from 2007 and Vice President of Marketing and Chief Financial Officer from 2004 to 2007. Prior to co-founding OptiMedica Corporation in 2004, Dr. Marcellino served in various senior executive roles at Lumenis, Ltd. (formerly a division of Coherent, Inc.) from 1993 to 2001. Dr. Marcellino has a B.A., M.Sc., and Ph.D. in Sensory Physiology and Psychophysics from the City University of New York.

Dr. Marcellino is independent and has extensive experience in the medical device industry. Dr. Marcellino has over thirty years of academic and work experience in ophthalmology, which has provided Dr. Marcellino with an understanding and familiarity with the operation, management and technology of ophthalmic device companies such as IRIDEX. Dr. Marcellino brings to the Company’s Board a functional understanding of the role of the board of directors, through his service in various senior executive roles. His executive experience also provides him with the financial acumen necessary to serve on our Audit Committee and our Compensation Committee.

Required Vote

Directors will be elected by a plurality vote of the shares of Common Stock present or represented and entitled to vote on this matter at the meeting. Accordingly, the five (5) candidates receiving the highest number of affirmative votes of shares represented and voted on this proposal at the meeting will be elected directors of the Company. Votes withheld from a nominee will be counted for purposes of determining the presence or absence of a quorum but, because directors are elected by a plurality vote, will have no impact once a quorum is established. See “Information Concerning Solicitation and Voting—Quorum; Abstentions; Broker Non-Votes” above.

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY

RECOMMENDS THAT STOCKHOLDERS VOTE “FOR”

EACH OF THE NOMINEES LISTED ABOVE

7

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE MATTERS

Independence of the Board of Directors

The Board has determined that, with the exception of Mr. Moore, who is the President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, all of its members are “independent directors” as defined in the listing standards of The Nasdaq Stock Market.

Board Leadership Structure and Oversight of Risk Management

In August 2012, the Board determined that Mr. Moore, the Chairman of the Board, also should serve as our President and Chief Executive Officer. We believe that Mr. Moore’s service as both Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer puts him in the best position to execute our business strategy and business plans to maximize stockholder value. Our bylaws and corporate governance guidelines do not require that our chairman and chief executive officer positions be separate and the Board believes that combining the positions is the appropriate leadership structure for the Company at this time. The CEO is responsible for setting the strategic direction for the Company and the day to day leadership and performance of the Company, while the Chairman of the Board leads the Board in its fundamental role of providing advice to and oversight of management, sets the agenda for Board meetings and presides over meetings of the full Board.

Our Board oversees an enterprise-wide approach to risk management, designed to support the achievement of organizational objectives, including strategic objectives, to improve long-term organizational performance and enhance stockholder value. A fundamental part of risk management is not only understanding the risks a company faces and what steps management is taking to manage those risks, but also understanding what level of risk is appropriate for the company. The involvement of the full Board in setting the Company’s business strategy is a key part of its assessment of management’s appetite for risk and also a determination of what constitutes an appropriate level of risk for the Company.

While the Board has the ultimate oversight responsibility for the risk management process, various committees of the Board also have responsibility for risk management. In particular, the Audit Committee focuses on financial risk, including internal controls. The Compensation Committee strives to create incentives that encourage a level of risk-taking behavior consistent with the Company’s business strategy. The Nominating and Governance Committee oversees risks relating to our Board composition.

Board Meetings and Committees

The Board held a total of eleven meetings during fiscal year 2015 ended January 2, 2016. Other than as described below, no directors serving during fiscal 2015 attended fewer than 75% of the aggregate of all meetings of the Board and no directors serving during fiscal 2015 attended fewer than 75% of the aggregate of all meetings of the committees of the Board upon which such director served. No director attended fewer than 75% of the Board and Board committee meetings held in the period during which he was a director and committee member. Dr. Marcellino joined the Compensation Committee in January 8, 2016. Dr. Marcellino did not attend any Compensation Committee meetings as a committee member prior to the date the he joined the committee.

Board Committees

During fiscal 2015, the Board had three standing committees: the Audit Committee, the Nominating and Governance Committee and the Compensation Committee.

Audit Committee. The Audit Committee of the Board consists of Mr. Fitch and Drs. Naumann-Etienne and Marcellino. Mr. Fitch is the chairman of the Audit Committee. The Audit Committee held five meetings during the last fiscal year. The Board has determined that each member of the Audit Committee is independent as defined under the listing standards of The Nasdaq Stock Market and that Mr. Fitch is an “audit committee

8

financial expert” as defined in rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). Among other things, the Audit Committee reviews and advises the Board regarding the Company’s accounting matters and is responsible for appointing and overseeing the work of the independent registered public accounting firm, pre-approving audit and non-audit services to be provided by the independent registered public accounting firm, and reviewing and evaluating the accounting principles being applied to the Company’s financial reports. The Audit Committee has adopted a written charter approved by the Board, which was amended in April 2009, a copy of which is available on our website at www.iridex.com.

Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee of the Board consists of Drs. Naumann-Etienne and Marcellino and Messrs. Fitch and Shuda. Mr. Shuda is the chairman of the Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee held three meetings during the last fiscal year. The Board has determined that each member of the Compensation Committee is independent as defined under the listing standards of The Nasdaq Stock Market. Among other things, the Compensation Committee reviews and advises the Board regarding all forms of compensation to be provided to the officers, employees, directors and consultants of the Company. The Compensation Committee has adopted a written charter approved by the Board, which was amended in April 2009 and in February 2014, a copy of which is available on our website at www.iridex.com.

Nominating and Governance Committee. The Nominating and Governance Committee of the Board consists of Dr. Naumann-Etienne and Mr. Shuda. Dr. Naumann-Etienne is the chairman of the Nominating and Governance Committee. The Nominating and Governance Committee held one meeting during the last fiscal year. The Board has determined that each member of the Nominating and Governance Committee is independent as defined under the listing standards of The Nasdaq Stock Market. Among other things, the Nominating and Governance Committee develops general criteria regarding the qualifications and selection of Board members and recommends candidates for election to the Board. It is the policy of the Nominating and Governance Committee to consider nominees for the Board submitted by the stockholders of the Company. For more information regarding the submission of nominees for the Board, see the discussion in “Corporate Governance Matters” below. The Nominating and Governance Committee has adopted a written charter approved by the Board, which was amended in April 2009, a copy of which is available on our website at www.iridex.com.

Attendance at Annual Stockholder Meetings by the Board of Directors

The Company has adopted a formal policy regarding attendance by members of the Board at the Company’s annual meeting of stockholders. The Company’s policy is that it encourages, but does not require, directors to attend the Company’s annual meeting of stockholders. Mr. Moore and Dr. Marcellino attended the Company’s 2015 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.

Process for Recommending Candidates for Election to the Board of Directors

The Nominating and Governance Committee is responsible for, among other things, determining the criteria for membership to the Board and recommending candidates for election to the Board. It is the policy of the Nominating and Governance Committee to consider recommendations for candidates to the Board from stockholders. Stockholders may present proper proposals for inclusion in the Company’s proxy statement and for consideration at the next annual meeting of its stockholders by timely submitting their proposals in writing to IRIDEX Corporation, Corporate Secretary, 1212 Terra Bella Avenue, Mountain View, CA 94043. In order to be included in the proxy statement for the 2017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, stockholder proposals must be received by the Company no later than January 5, 2017, must be accompanied by the information required by the Company’s Bylaws and must otherwise comply with the requirements of Rule 14a-8 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

The Company seeks independent directors who represent a mix of backgrounds and experiences that will enhance the quality of the Board’s deliberations and decisions. Candidates should have substantial experience with one or more publicly traded national or multinational companies and should have achieved a high level of

9

distinction in their fields. The Nominating and Governance Committee’s general criteria and process for evaluating and identifying the candidates that it recommends to the full Board for selection as director nominees are as follows:

• In its evaluation of director candidates, including the members of the Board eligible for re-election, the Nominating and Governance Committee seeks to achieve a balance of knowledge, experience and capability on the Board and considers (1) the current size and composition of the Board and the needs of the Board and the respective committees of the Board, (2) such factors as issues of character, judgment, diversity, age, expertise, business experience, length of service, independence, and other commitments, and (3) such other factors as the Nominating and Governance Committee may consider appropriate.

• While the Nominating and Governance Committee has not established specific minimum qualifications for director candidates, the Nominating and Governance Committee believes that candidates and nominees must reflect a Board that is comprised of directors who (1) are predominantly independent, (2) are of high integrity, (3) have qualifications that will increase overall Board effectiveness and (4) meet other requirements as may be required by applicable rules, such as financial literacy or financial expertise with respect to audit committee members.

• In evaluating and identifying candidates, the Nominating and Governance Committee has the authority to retain and terminate any third-party search firm that is used to identify director candidates, and has the authority to approve the fees and retention terms of any such firm.

• With regard to candidates who are properly recommended by stockholders or by other means, the Nominating and Governance Committee will review the qualifications of any such candidate, which review may, in the Nominating and Governance Committee’s discretion, include interviewing references for the candidate, direct interviews with the candidate, or other actions that the Nominating and Governance Committee deems necessary or proper.

• The Nominating and Governance Committee will apply these same principles when evaluating director candidates who may be elected initially by the full Board to fill vacancies or newly created directorships prior to the next annual meeting of stockholders at which directors are elected.

• After such review and consideration, the Nominating and Governance Committee selects, or recommends that the Board select, the slate of director nominees, either at a meeting of the Nominating and Governance Committee at which a quorum is present or by unanimous written consent of the Nominating and Governance Committee.

Consistent with past practice, the Nominating and Governance Committee and the Board will continue to monitor and assess the size and composition of the Board and will consider the appointment of additional directors from time to time as appropriate to serve the best interests of the Company and its stockholders.

Contacting the Board of Directors

Any stockholder who desires to contact our Chairman of the Board or the other members of our Board may do so electronically by sending an email to the following address: BOD@iridex.com. Alternatively, a stockholder can contact our Chairman of the Board or the other members of the Board by writing to: Board of Directors, c/o Chairman of the Board, IRIDEX Corporation, 1212 Terra Bella Avenue, Mountain View, CA 94043. Communications received electronically or in writing will be distributed to the Chairman of the Board or the other members of the Board as appropriate depending on the facts and circumstances outlined in the communication received.

Code of Business Conduct and Ethics

The Company’s policy is to conduct its operations in compliance with all applicable laws and regulations and to operate its business under the fundamental principles of honesty, integrity and ethical behavior. This

10

policy can be found in the Company’s Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, which is applicable to all of our directors, officers and employees. Such Code of Business Conduct and Ethics incorporates the Code of Ethics required by Section 406 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and Item 406 of Regulation S-K. The Code of Business Conduct and Ethics also complies with the listing standards of The Nasdaq Stock Market.

The Code of Business Conduct and Ethics is designed to promote honest and ethical conduct, the compliance with all applicable laws, rules and regulations and to deter wrongdoing. The Code of Business Conduct and Ethics is also aimed at ensuring that information we provide to the public (including our filings with and submissions to the SEC) is accurate, complete, fair, relevant, timely and understandable. A copy of the formally adopted Code of Business Conduct and Ethics is available on our website at www.iridex.com. We intend to disclose future amendments to certain provisions of the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, or waivers of such provisions granted to directors and executive officers, on our web site at www.iridex.com pursuant to applicable requirements of the SEC and The Nasdaq Stock Market.

11

PROPOSAL TWO

RATIFICATION OF THE APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

Introduction

The Audit Committee has appointed Burr Pilger Mayer, Inc. (“BPM”), an independent registered public accounting firm, to audit the consolidated financial statements of the Company for fiscal year 2016 ending December 31, 2016, and recommends that stockholders vote for ratification of such appointment. BPM also served as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal year 2015 ended January 2, 2016. Representatives of BPM are expected to be present at the meeting with the opportunity to make a statement if they desire to do so and are expected to be available to respond to appropriate questions.

Although action by stockholders is not required by law, the Board has determined that it is desirable to request approval of this selection by the stockholders. Notwithstanding the approval of this selection by the stockholders, the Audit Committee, in its discretion, may direct the appointment of a new independent registered public accounting firm at any time during the year, if the Audit Committee feels that such a change would be in the best interest of the Company and its stockholders. In the event of a negative vote on ratification, the Audit Committee will reconsider its selection.

Fees Billed to the Company by the Company’s Principal Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm During the Previous Two Fiscal Years

The following table presents fees (in thousands) for professional audit services and other services rendered to the Company by its principal independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal year 2015 ended January 2, 2016 and fiscal year 2014 ended January 3, 2015.

	Fiscal 2015		Fiscal 2014
	(in thousands)
Audit Fees(1)	$	357	$	330
Audit-Related Fees(2)		—		—
Total	$	357	$	330

(1) Audit Fees consisted of fees for professional services rendered for the audit of the Company’s annual consolidated financial statements included in the Company’s Annual Reports on Form 10-K and for the review of the consolidated financial statements included in the Company’s Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, as well as reviews of regulatory and statutory filings.

(2) This category consists of assurance and related services by the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of the Company’s consolidated financial statements and are not reported above under “Audit Fees.” BPM did not perform any such services for the Company in fiscal years 2015 or 2014.

Pre-Approval of Audit and Non-Audit Services

The Audit Committee has established a policy governing the Company’s use of its principal independent registered public accounting firm for non-audit services. Under the policy, management may use its principal independent registered public accounting firm for non-audit services that are permitted under SEC rules and regulations, provided that management obtains the Audit Committee’s approval before such services are rendered. BPM did not provide any non-audit services for the Company in fiscal years 2015 or 2014.

The Audit Committee pre-approved all of the services and fees identified in the table above in accordance with its charter and applicable laws, rules and regulations.

12

Required Vote

If a quorum is present, the affirmative vote of a majority of the Votes Cast will be required to approve the ratification of the appointment of Burr Pilger Mayer, Inc. See “Information Concerning Solicitation and Voting—Quorum; Abstentions; Broker Non-Votes.”

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY

RECOMMENDS THAT STOCKHOLDERS VOTE “FOR”

RATIFICATION OF THE APPOINTMENT OF BURR

PILGER MAYER, INC.

13

PROPOSAL THREE

NON-BINDING VOTE TO APPROVE THE COMPENSATION OF OUR NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

Introduction

The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010, or the Dodd-Frank Act, enables our stockholders to vote to approve, on an advisory or non-binding basis, the compensation of our named executive officers as disclosed in accordance with the SEC’s rules in the “Executive Compensation” section of this proxy statement. This proposal, commonly known as a “say-on-pay” proposal, gives our stockholders the opportunity to express their views on our named executive officers’ compensation as a whole. This vote is not intended to address any specific item of compensation or any specific named executive officer, but rather the overall compensation of all of our named executive officers and the philosophy, policies and practices described in this proxy statement.

Non-Binding Vote To Approve Compensation of the Company’s Named Executive Officers

The say-on-pay vote is advisory, and therefore not binding on the Company, the Compensation Committee or our Board. The say-on-pay vote will, however, provide information to us regarding investor sentiment about our executive compensation philosophy, policies and practices. Our Board and our Compensation Committee value the opinions of our stockholders and to the extent there is any significant vote against the named executive officer compensation as disclosed in this proxy statement, we will consider our stockholders’ concerns and the Compensation Committee will evaluate whether any actions are necessary to address those concerns.

Compensation Program and Philosophy

Following is a summary of some of the key points of our 2016 executive compensation program. See the “Executive Compensation” section of this proxy statement below for more information.

The Company’s compensation philosophy with respect to executive officers is designed to attract, retain, motivate and reward highly qualified executives who contribute to the success of the Company and its stockholders. To achieve these goals, the Company strives to provide a comprehensive compensation package for each executive officer that is competitive with those offered by companies of similar type and size, in the same geographical area and whose executives perform functions similar to those performed by the executives of the Company.

Compensation Committee Oversight

The Company’s Compensation Committee is responsible for overseeing and approving the Company’s executive compensation programs and policies. The Compensation Committee is comprised solely of independent members of the Board, as defined under the listing standards of the SEC and The Nasdaq Stock Market. The Company’s executive compensation practices and programs as a whole are reviewed annually by the Compensation Committee. In addition, each executive officer’s individual compensation and eligibility for participation in the Company’s annual cash bonus incentive program are reviewed by the Compensation Committee and adjustments are made based upon an assessment of individual performance and potential to enhance long-term stockholder value.

Elements of Executive Compensation

The elements of the Company’s compensation package include base salary, annual cash bonus incentives, long-term incentive compensation in the form of equity awards, and various benefits generally available to employees of the Company. We generally strive to set the total compensation opportunity for our executive officers at the mid-point of similar companies based on peer and survey group data.

14

In addition to competitive base salary amounts, we provide an annual cash bonus incentive program for executive officers and senior employees which is based upon the achievement of corporate performance objectives determined by our Board and individual performance objectives determined by the Compensation Committee. We also use equity awards, which typically vest over a period of four years, to provide long-term incentive compensation.

Required Vote

If a quorum is present, the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the shares present and entitled to vote is necessary to approve the non-binding, advisory vote to approve the compensation of our named executive officers as disclosed in this proxy statement. See “Information Concerning Solicitation and Voting—Quorum; Abstentions; Broker Non-Votes.”

We believe that our compensation programs and philosophy for our executive officers, described above and within the Executive Compensation section of this proxy statement, has been appropriately designed and operates to ensure management’s interests are aligned with our stockholders’ interests to support long-term value creation.

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY

RECOMMENDS THAT STOCKHOLDERS VOTE “FOR”

THE ADVISORY (NON-BINDING) VOTE APPROVING

THE COMPENSATION OF THE COMPANY’S NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

AS DISCLOSED IN THIS PROXY STATEMENT.

15

EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

The following table sets forth certain information with respect to the Company’s executive officers as of May 5, 2016.

Name	Age	Position
William M. Moore	67	President and Chief Executive Officer, Chairman of the Board of Directors
Ronald Steckel	63	Vice President, Operations

See Mr. Moore’s biography under “Proposal One—Election of Directors.”

Ronald Steckel joined the company in April 2012 as Vice President, Operations. Prior to joining IRIDEX, from January 2009 to March 2012, Mr. Steckel was an independent consultant, providing broad-based consulting services to medical technology companies from development stage to full commercialization. From June 2010 to December 2010, Mr. Steckel was President and CEO of Morris Innovative, focused primarily on fund raising to support the commercial launch of an innovative therapeutic vascular closure device. From August 2007 to November 2008, he served as President and CEO of Pulmonx during the transition to later stage product development and associated fund raising for US clinical trials. From July 2004 to July 2007, Mr. Steckel served as Chief Operating Officer of FoxHollow Technologies, a leader in peripheral vascular therapeutics which was acquired by ev3 Inc. Mr. Steckel received his Masters degree in Business Administration from Lake Forest College and his B.S. in Biology from Blackburn University in Carlinville, IL.

16

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Executive Summary

IRIDEX believes that the skill, talent, judgment and dedication of its executive officers are critical factors affecting the long-term value of our Company. Therefore, the goal for our executive compensation program is to fairly compensate our executives, attract and retain qualified executives who are able to contribute to our long-term success, induce performance consistent with clearly defined corporate goals, and align our executives’ long-term interests with those of our stockholders. The Company believes that its executive compensation program satisfies this goal and is strongly aligned with the long-term interests of our stockholders. Moreover, we believe that the structure of our executive compensation program, in rewarding the achievement of annual operating goals and emphasizing long-term stockholder value creation over short-term operating results, has benefited our Company and our stockholders by focusing on growing our core business.

Compensation Philosophy

The Company’s compensation philosophy is designed to attract, retain and reward personnel who contribute to the success of the Company. To achieve these goals, the Company strives to provide a comprehensive compensation package for each executive officer that is competitive with those offered by companies of similar type and size, in the same geographical area and whose executives perform functions similar to those performed by the executives of the Company. The Company also incorporates equity-based incentives into its overall compensation strategy to align the financial interests of our executives with those of our stockholders.

Role and Authority of the Compensation Committee

The Compensation Committee of the Board establishes the overall executive compensation strategies of the Company and approves compensation elements for the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and other executive officers. Among other things, the Compensation Committee reviews and advises the Board regarding all forms of compensation to be provided to the officers, employees, directors and consultants of the Company. The Compensation Committee consists of Drs. Naumann-Etienne and Marcellino and Messrs. Fitch and Shuda. Mr. Shuda is the chairman of the Compensation Committee. Each member of the Compensation Committee is an independent member of the Board, and no members have interlocking relationships as defined by the SEC.

The Compensation Committee has available to it such external compensation advice and data as the Compensation Committee deems appropriate to obtain. The Compensation Committee may delegate any of its responsibilities to one or more of its members or to the Company’s directors or to members of management, to the extent permitted by applicable law and subject to such reporting to or ratification by the Compensation Committee as the Compensation Committee deems necessary or appropriate.

Executive Officer Compensation

The objectives of our executive officer compensation program are to attract, retain, motivate and reward key personnel who possess the necessary leadership and management skills through competitive base salary, annual cash bonus incentives, long-term equity incentive compensation, and various benefits generally available to employees of the Company.

Our named executive officers for fiscal 2015, which consist of our principal executive officer, our one other executive officer and one former executive officer who was not serving as an executive officer at the end of fiscal 2015, are:

• William M. Moore, our Chief Executive Officer;

• Ronald Steckel, our Vice President, Operations; and

• James H. Mackaness, our former Chief Financial Officer and Chief Operating Officer.

17

Base Salary

Base salary levels for the Company’s executive officers are generally targeted to be competitive with companies in the same stage of development and in the same industry and geographic area. In determining salaries, the Compensation Committee also takes into account the Chief Executive Officer’s recommendations, individual experience, contributions to corporate goals and the Company’s performance.

Incentive Bonuses

The Compensation Committee believes that a cash incentive bonus plan can serve to motivate the Company’s executive officers and management to achieve annual performance goals supporting the creation of stockholder value, using more immediate measures for performance than those reflected in the appreciation in value of stock options. The Compensation Committee approved an incentive bonus plan for each of fiscal 2016, 2015 and 2014, which are described in further detail below.

2016 Management By Objectives Plan

In March 2016, the Board approved the Company’s 2016 “Management By Objectives” Plan (the “2016 MBO Plan”). Our CEO and all vice presidents, corporate officers and other specified senior employees, in good standing, were eligible to participate in the 2016 MBO Plan. Awards under the 2016 MBO Plan are based upon the achievement of certain objectives specific to each 2016 MBO Plan participant. Mr. Moore’s award under the 2016 MBO Plan is subject to the Company’s achievement of certain revenue and earnings per share targets, as well as certain other financial and operations-related performance goals specific to Mr. Moore. Mr. Steckel’s award under the 2016 MBO Plan is subject to the Company’s achievement of certain revenue targets, as well as certain other financial and operations-related performance goals specific to Mr. Steckel.

Mr. Moore’s maximum amount payable under the 2016 MBO Plan is $174,000 and Mr. Steckel’s maximum amount payable under the 2016 MBO Plan is $82,000. The corporate performance objectives are intended to be rigorous and challenge our executive officers to achieve. The Compensation Committee will approve any bonus distributions under the 2016 MBO Plan, other than with respect to the CEO, which the Board will approve.

2015 Senior Management Bonus Program

In January 2015, the Compensation Committee approved the Company’s 2015 Senior Management Bonus Program (the “2015 Bonus Program”). All of our vice presidents, corporate officers and other specified senior employees, in good standing, were eligible to participate in the 2015 Bonus Program. Messrs. Mackaness and Steckel target amounts under the Bonus Program were $60,000 and $50,000, respectively.

Awards under the 2015 Bonus Program were based upon the Company’s achievement of certain revenue and gross margin goals and the individual participant’s achievement of certain individual performance goals in fiscal year 2015.

Revenue-Based Component: The revenue-based component of the 2015 Bonus Program represented 70% of the total available award amount. If the Company achieved less than approximately 88% of the revenue target, participants would earn 0% of the target amount associated with the revenue-based component. If the Company achieved 100% of the revenue target, participants would earn 100% of the target amount associated with the revenue-based component. If the Company achieved approximately 112% of the revenue target, participants would earn 200% of the target amount associated with the revenue-based component. Amounts payable under the revenue-based component of the 2015 Bonus Program scale upward between these achievement levels and are capped at 200%.

Gross Margin-Based Component: The gross margin-based component of the 2015 Bonus Program represented 20% of the total available award amount. If the Company achieved less than approximately 98%

18

of the gross margin target, participants would earn 0% of the target amount associated with the gross margin-based component. If the Company achieved 100% of the gross margin target, participants would earn 100% of the target amount associated with the gross margin-based component. If the Company achieved approximately 102% of the gross margin target, participants would earn 200% of the target amount associated with the gross margin-based component. Amounts payable under the gross margin-based component of the 2015 Bonus Program scale upward between these achievement levels and are capped at 200%.

Individual Component: The individual performance component represented 10% of the total available award amount. In the event a participant does not meet or partially meets his or her individual performance goals, the individual performance component amount would be reduced, as determined by the Compensation Committee. Amounts payable under the individual performance component of the 2015 Bonus Program are capped at 100%.

Additional Conditions: No amount was payable under the revenue-based component if the Company achieved less than approximately 94% of the gross-margin target. Furthermore, no amount was payable under any component of the 2015 Bonus Program unless the Company achieved a minimum level of operating income in fiscal year 2015. For the purposes of the 2015 Bonus Program, “operating income” is defined as gross profits less operating expenses and unusual items excluded by the Compensation Committee, and therefore did not include other income or expenses or taxes.

The actual payments to our applicable named executive officers under the 2015 Bonus Program can be found in the 2015 Summary Compensation Table below.

2014 Executive Management Bonus Plan

The 2014 executive management bonus plan (the “2014 Bonus Plan”) provided cash incentive payouts to all eligible senior staff-level employees based upon Company and individual performance. All vice presidents, corporate officers and other specified senior employees, in good standing, were eligible to participate in the 2014 Bonus Plan. Target payouts for each participant under the 2014 Bonus Plan were based on a specified percentage of annual base salary and were triggered upon the achievement of both corporate performance objectives determined by the Board and individual performance objectives determined by the Compensation Committee. The corporate performance objectives were intended to be rigorous and challenge our executive officers to achieve. The Compensation Committee approved the bonus distributions.

The actual payments to our applicable named executive officers under the 2014 Bonus Plan can be found in the 2015 Summary Compensation Table below.

Stock Grants/Awards

Stock options or other stock grants are granted to executive officers and other employees under the Company’s 2008 Equity Incentive Plan (the “2008 EIP”). These stock options, restricted stock units (“RSUs”) or other stock grants are intended to focus the recipient on the Company’s long-term performance to improve stockholder value and to retain the services of executive officers in a competitive job market by providing significant long-term earning potential. To this end, stock options, RSUs and stock grants generally vest over a four-year period, based on continued employment. Factors considered in granting stock options, RSUs and stock grants to executive officers of the Company are the duties and responsibilities of each individual, such individual’s contributions to the success of the Company and other relevant factors. The Company views stock options, RSUs and stock grants as an important component of long-term compensation for executive officers because the Compensation Committee believes that options motivate executive officers to manage the Company in a manner that is consistent with the interests of stockholders. In general, we issue only non-statutory stock options, RSUs and stock grants to our executive officers.

19

2016 RSU Awards

In March 2016, the Board granted an award of performance-based restricted stock units (“PRSUs”) to each of Mr. Moore and Mr. Steckel. Mr. Moore’s target number of PRSUs is 50,000 and Mr. Steckel’s target number of PRSUs is 40,000.

Each PRSU represents the right to receive one share of Common Stock and is subject to the terms of the 2008 EIP and the applicable performance-based restricted stock unit award agreement under the 2008 EIP. The PRSUs will become eligible to vest (“vesting eligible PRSUs”) if the Company’s stock price (measured based on the average, trailing, 60 day closing price of a share of Common Stock) achieves one or more of the four specified stock price performance goals, measured during four performance periods covering each of the Company’s fiscal years 2016 through 2019. The achievement of each performance goal results in 25% of the target number of PRSUs becoming vesting eligible PRSUs. The maximum number of PRSUs that can vest under the PRSU award is 100% of the target number of PRSUs.

If any of the performance goals are met, vesting of the PRSUs additionally is subject to the executive’s continued service with the Company through the applicable vesting date as follows. Any vesting eligible PRSUs will be scheduled to vest on an annual basis on the last day of the performance period (provided that the first vesting date for any PRSUs that become eligible to vest during a particular performance period will be delayed until the performance results are certified). However, the maximum number of PRSUs that can vest (i) upon completion of each performance period will be 25% of the target number of PRSUs and (ii) prior to the end of the last performance period will be 50% of the target number of PRSUs.

In the event of a change in control of the Company, the performance periods will end and a final measurement of the Company’s stock price will occur. For this final measurement, the Company’s stock price will be determined based on the value of the consideration that common stockholders receive in the change in control. Upon the final measurement, any vesting eligible PRSUs will vest in full, and any PRSUs that have not become eligible to vest will be scheduled to vest based on continued service (but not subject to any further performance criteria), on the last day of the Company’s fiscal year 2019. If, on or after the change in control, the executive’s employment is terminated without cause, a prorated number of the then unvested PRSUs will accelerate vesting based on the total period following the change in control during which the executive provided services.

2015 RSU Awards

In January 2015, the Compensation Committee granted restricted stock unit (“RSU”) awards to Messrs. Moore, Mackaness, and Steckel for up to 50,000, 40,000, and 30,000, shares of Common Stock.

Mr. Moore will vest in 10,000 shares of Common Stock subject to his RSUs 60 days following the fourth anniversary of the grant date if the average closing price of the Common Stock during such 60 day period equals or exceeds 100% of a specified target average closing price under the award. Mr. Moore will vest in an additional 10,000 shares of Common Stock subject to his RSUs 60 days following the fourth anniversary of the grant date if the average closing price of the Common Stock during such 60 day period equals or exceeds 115% of such target average closing price. Mr. Moore will vest in an additional 10,000 shares of Common Stock subject to his RSUs 60 days following the fourth anniversary of the grant date if the average closing price of the Common Stock during such 60 day period equals or exceeds 130% of such target average closing price. Finally, Mr. Moore will vest in an additional 20,000 shares of Common Stock subject to his RSUs 60 days following the fourth anniversary of the grant date if the average closing price of the Common Stock during such 60 day period equals or exceeds 150% of such target average closing price. The vesting of the RSUs is subject to Mr. Moore’s continued service through the applicable vesting date.

Mr. Steckel will vest in 10,000 shares of Common Stock subject to his RSUs as follows: 20% of such shares will vest upon the grant date, and an additional 20% of such shares will vest upon each of the first, second, third

20

and fourth anniversary of the grant date. Mr. Steckel will vest in an additional 10,000 shares of Common Stock subject to his RSUs 60 days following the fourth anniversary of the grant date if the average closing price of the Common Stock during such 60 day period equals or exceeds 100% of his target average closing price. Finally, Mr. Steckel will vest in an additional 10,000 shares of Common Stock subject to his RSUs 60 days following the fourth anniversary of the grant date if the average closing price of the Common Stock during such 60 day period equals or exceeds 120% of his target average closing price. The vesting of the RSUs is subject to Mr. Steckel’s continued service through the applicable vesting date.

2014 RSU Awards

In January 2014, the Compensation Committee granted Mr. Moore a restricted stock unit award for up to 50,000 shares of Common Stock under the terms of the 2008 EIP. This award is referred to as the “Market Performance Award.” The Market Performance Award was intended to more directly align Mr. Moore’s compensation with the Company’s stock performance. The number of shares issuable pursuant to the Market Performance Award was based upon the Company’s average stock price performance upon a vesting event, or the fair market value of the Common Stock in the event vesting were triggered by a change of control of the Company. The Market Performance Award granted in January 2014 vested upon Mr. Moore’s continuous service as President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company through December 31, 2014.

2008 Equity Incentive Plan

The 2008 EIP was adopted by the Board in February 2008 and was approved by the stockholders in June 2008. In 2014, the stockholders approved an amendment to the 2008 EIP for purposes of complying with Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, to increase the share reserve under the 2008 EIP, and to make certain other amendments to the terms of the 2008 EIP. The 2008 EIP provides for the grant of the following types of incentive awards: (i) stock options; (ii) stock purchase rights; (iii) restricted stock; (iv) restricted stock units; (v) performance shares; (vi) performance units; and (vii) stock appreciation rights. Since the expiration of the 1998 Stock Plan, equity compensation granted to the Company’s non-employee directors has been granted under the 2008 EIP. The exercise price of incentive stock options and stock appreciation rights granted under the 2008 EIP must be at least equal to the fair market value of the shares at the time of grant. With respect to any recipient who owns stock possessing more than 10% of the voting power of our outstanding capital stock, the exercise price of any option or stock purchase right granted must be at least equal to 110% of the fair market value at the time of grant. Options granted under the 2008 EIP are exercisable at such times and under such conditions as determined by the administrator of the plan; generally over a four-year period. The maximum term of incentive stock options granted to any recipient must not exceed ten years; provided, however, that the maximum term of an incentive stock option granted to any recipient possessing more than 10% of the voting power of our outstanding capital stock must not exceed five years. In the case of stock purchase rights, unless the administrator of the plan determines otherwise, we have a repurchase option exercisable upon the voluntary or involuntary termination of the purchaser’s employment with us for any reason (including death or disability). Such repurchase option lapses at a rate determined by the administrator of the plan. The purchase price for shares repurchased by us is the original price paid by the purchaser. The form of consideration for exercising an option or stock purchase right, including the method of payment, is determined by the administrator. The 2008 EIP expires in June 2018.

In the event of a merger or change in control of the Company, each outstanding award granted under the 2008 EIP will be treated as the administrator of the plan determines, including that each award will be assumed or an equivalent option or right substituted by the successor corporation or a parent or subsidiary of the successor corporation. In the event that the successor corporation, or the parent or subsidiary of the successor corporation, does not assume or substitute for the award, the participant will fully vest in and have the right to exercise all of his or her outstanding options or stock appreciation rights, including shares as to which such awards would not otherwise be vested or exercisable, all restrictions on restricted stock will lapse, and, with respect to restricted stock units, performance shares and performance units, all performance goals or other vesting criteria will be

21

deemed achieved at target levels and all other terms and conditions met. In addition, if an option or stock appreciation right becomes fully vested and exercisable in lieu of assumption or substitution in the event of a change in control, the administrator will notify the participant in writing or electronically that the option or stock appreciation right will be fully vested and exercisable for a period of time determined by the administrator in its sole discretion, and the option or stock appreciation right will terminate upon the expiration of such period.

Other Benefits

Executive officers are eligible to participate in all of our employee benefit plans, such as medical, dental, vision, group life, disability, and accidental death and dismemberment insurance, and our 401(k) plan, in each case on the same basis as other employees, subject to applicable law. We also provide vacation and other paid holidays to all employees, including our executive officers, which we intend to be comparable to those provided at peer companies. In addition, Mr. Moore is entitled to reimbursement for the reasonable cost of housing and international airline travel for his spouse to accompany him on extended international travel on behalf of the Company.

401(k) Plan

The Company sponsors a 401(k) Plan under which eligible employees may contribute, on a pre-tax basis, up to 15% of the employee’s total annual income from the Company, excluding bonuses, subject to certain IRS limitations. The Company maintains a Company match in the amount of $3,000 per year. All full-time employees who have attained age 18 are eligible to participate in the plan. All contributions are allocated to the employee’s individual account and, at the employee’s election, are invested in one or more investment funds available under the plan. Contributions are fully vested and not forfeitable.

2015 Summary Compensation Table

Name and Principal Position	Year		Salary ($)		Bonus		Stock Awards ($) (1)		Nonequity Incentive Plan Compensation		All Other Compensation ($) (2)		Total ($)
William M. Moore(3)		2015		420,192		—		234,050		—		34,986		689,228
President and Chief Executive Officer		2014		387,391		—		233,605		—		10,650		631,646
James H. Mackaness		2015		236,397		—		219,200		—		2,930		458,527
Chief Financial Officer and Chief Operating Officer		2014		323,456		—		—		14,787		4,242		342,485
Ronald Steckel		2015		250,000		—		175,017		13,125		6,564		444,706
Vice President, Operations		2014		247,094		—		—		11,374		6,534		265,002

(1) Reflects the aggregate grant date fair value of awards computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. We discuss the assumptions that we used to calculate these amounts in Note 10 to our financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 2, 2016, and incorporated by reference herein. As required by SEC rules, the amounts shown exclude the impact of estimated forfeitures related to service-based vesting conditions.

(2) Unless otherwise indicated, “All Other Compensation” consists solely of the value of life insurance premiums paid and 401(k) matching payments made paid by the Company.

(3) In 2014, Mr. Moore’s other compensation consisted of $3,909 of reimbursement of housing related expenses and $6,741 of life insurance premiums. In 2015, Mr. Moore’s other compensation consisted of $28,128 of reimbursement of travel related expenses and $6,858 of life insurance premiums.

22

Outstanding Equity Awards at 2015 Fiscal Year-End

The following table shows, with respect to each of our named executive officers, the number of options exercisable and unexercisable and the number of shares of RSU awards that have not vested as of the end of fiscal 2015. Mr. Mackaness had no options or RSU awards outstanding as of the end of fiscal 2015.

	Option Awards									Stock Awards
Name	Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#)					Option Exercise Price ($) (1)		Option Expiration Date (2)		Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested (#)			Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Market or Payout Value of Unearned Shares, Units or other Rights that have not Vested ($) (3)
	Exercisable			Unexercisable
William M. Moore		5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000	(4)  (4)  (4)  (4)		—   —   —   —		2.27 3.90 3.95 3.7499		7/1/2016 7/1/2017 7/1/2018 7/2/2019		—   —   —   —			—   —   —   —
											50,000	(5)		464,500
Ronald Steckel		4,166 2,500	(6)  (7)		4,167 7,500		3.990 3.856		4/16/2019 12/13/2019		—   —			—   —
											28,000	(8)		260,120

(1) Options were granted at an exercise price per share equal to the fair market value of a share of Common Stock, as determined by reference to the closing price reported on The Nasdaq Global Market on the date of grant.

(2) Options held by our named executive officers may terminate before their expiration dates if the optionee’s status as an employee is terminated or upon the optionee’s death or disability.

(3) This amount reflects the fair market value of our common stock of $9.29 per share as of December 31, 2015 multiplied by the amount shown in the column for the Number of Shares or Units of Stock that have Not Vested.

(4) Shares subject to the option are fully vested and immediately exercisable.

(5) Each restricted stock unit subject to the RSU awards granted to Mr. Moore represents a contingent right to receive one (1) share of Common Stock. The RSUs shall vest, subject to his continued service through the applicable vesting date, as follows: (i) under his first RSU award, 10,000 RSUs will vest 60 days following the fourth anniversary of January 9, 2015, the grant date, if the average closing price of Common Stock during such 60 day period equals or exceeds 100% of the target closing price under such award, (ii) under his second RSU award, 10,000 RSUs will vest 60 days following the fourth anniversary of the grant date if the average closing price of Common Stock during such 60 day period equals or exceeds 115% of the target average closing price under his first RSU award, (iii) under his third RSU award, 10,000 RSUs will vest 60 days following the fourth anniversary of the grant date if the average closing price of Common Stock during such 60 day period equals or exceeds 130% of the target average closing price under his first RSU award and (iv) under his fourth RSU award, 20,000 RSUs will vest 60 days following the fourth anniversary of the grant date if the average closing price of Common Stock during such 60 day period equals or exceeds 150% of the target average closing price under his first RSU award.

(6) The option granted to Mr. Steckel is scheduled to vest as to 25% of the underlying shares on the one-year anniversary of the vesting commencement date, and 1/48^th each month thereafter, subject to his continued service through each applicable vesting date.

(7) The option granted to Mr. Steckel is scheduled to vest as 1/48th of the total number of shares vest each month after the vesting commencement date.

(8) Each restricted stock unit subject to the RSU awards granted to Mr. Steckel represents a contingent right to receive one (1) share of Common Stock. Mr. Steckel was granted an RSU award covering 10,000 shares that will vest, subject to Mr. Steckel’s continued service through the applicable vesting date, as follows: 20% of the RSUs will vest upon the grant date, and an additional 20% of the RSUs will vest upon each of the first,

23

second, third and fourth anniversary of the grant date. Mr. Steckel also was granted an RSU award covering 20,000 shares that will vest, subject to Mr. Steckel’s continued service through the applicable vesting date, as follows: (i) 10,000 RSUs will vest 60 days following the fourth anniversary of the grant date if the average closing price of Common Stock during such 60 day period equals or exceeds 100% of the target average closing price and (ii) an additional 10,000 RSUs will vest 60 days following the fourth anniversary of the grant date if the average closing price of Common Stock during such 60 day period equals or exceeds 120% of the target average closing price.

Change of Control Agreements with Messrs. Moore and Steckel

In March 2015, the Company entered into Change of Control and Severance Agreement with each of Messrs. Moore, Mackaness and Steckel (the “Change of Control Agreements”). The Change of Control Agreement with Mr. Mackaness was terminated in connection with his resignation from the Company in September 2015.The Change of Control Agreements provide Messrs. Moore and Steckel with certain severance benefits in the event that their respective employment with the Company is terminated under certain circumstances, as described below. Each of Messrs. Moore, Mackaness and Steckel is referred to as the “Executive” in the context of his respective Change of Control Agreement in the discussion below.

Termination Within the Change of Control Context

If in the event that, within twelve months following a Change in Control (as defined in the 2008 EIP) or at any time prior to a Change in Control if such termination is effected at the request of any successor to the Company (such time period, the “Change of Control Period”), the Executive terminates his employment with the Company for Good Reason (as defined below), or the Company terminates the Executive’s employment for a reason other than Cause (as defined below), death or disability, and, in each case, the Executive signs and does not revoke a standard release of claims with the Company, then the Executive will receive the following severance from the Company:

(i) Cash Severance Payment. In the case of Mr. Moore, a lump sum cash payment equal to 150% of his annual base salary. In the case of Mr. Steckel, a lump sum cash payment equal to 50% of his annual base salary. In the case of Mr. Mackaness, payments equal to 100% of his annual base salary, payable in installments over the twelve month period following termination.

(ii) Vesting Acceleration. Accelerated vesting as to 100% of the then unvested portion of the Executive’s outstanding Company equity awards, assuming, with respect to Company equity awards subject to performance criteria, the performance criteria had been achieved at target levels.

(iii) Continued Employee Benefits. Reimbursement from the Company for a period of up to twelve months for the costs and expenses incurred by himself and/or his eligible dependents for coverage under the Company’s benefit plans.

Termination Outside of the Change of Control Context

The Change of Control Agreements between the Company and Mr. Mackaness and Mr. Steckel, respectively, also entitle Mr. Mackaness and Mr. Steckel to certain benefits outside of the Change of Control context, as described below.

In the event that, at any time other than during the Change of Control Period, the Executive terminates his employment with the Company for Good Reason, or the Company terminates the Executive employment for a reason other than Cause, death or disability, and, in each case, the Executive signs and does not revoke a standard release of claims with the Company, then the Executive will receive the following severance from the Company:

(i) Cash Severance Payment. In the case of Mr. Steckel, cash payments equal to 50% of his annual base salary, payable in installments over the twelve month period following termination. In the case of Mr. Mackaness, cash payments equal to 100% of Mr. Mackaness’ annual base salary, payable in installments over the twelve month period following termination.

24

(ii) Continued Employee Benefits. Reimbursement from the Company for a period of up to twelve months for the costs and expenses incurred by himself and/or his eligible dependents for coverage under the Company’s benefit plans.

Definitions of “Cause” and “Good Reason”

For the purposes of the Change of Control Agreements, the following definitions will apply.

“Cause” generally means (i) an act of dishonesty made by Executive in connection with Executive’s responsibilities as an employee; (ii) Executive’s conviction of, or plea of nolo contendere to, a felony or any crime involving fraud, embezzlement or any other act of moral turpitude, or a material violation of federal or state law by Executive that the Board reasonably believes has had or will have a detrimental effect on the Company’s reputation or business; (iii) Executive’s gross misconduct; (iv) Executive’s unauthorized use or disclosure of any proprietary information or trade secrets of the Company or any other party to whom Executive owes an obligation of nondisclosure as a result of Executive’s relationship with the Company; (v) Executive’s willful breach of any obligations under any written agreement or covenant with the Company; or (vi) Executive’s continued failure to perform his employment duties after Executive has received a written demand of performance from the Company which specifically sets forth the factual basis for the Company’s belief that Executive has not substantially performed his duties and has failed to cure such non-performance to the Company’s satisfaction within ten business days after receiving such notice.

“Good Reason” generally means the occurrence of one or more of the following events effected without Executive’s prior consent, provided that Executive’s employment terminates within 90 days following the expiration of the Company’s Cure Period (defined below): (i) the assignment to Executive of any duties or the reduction of Executive’s duties, either of which results in a material diminution in Executive’s position or responsibilities with the Company; provided that, it being understood that the continuance of Executive’s duties and responsibilities at the subsidiary or divisional level following a Change in Control, rather than at the parent, combined or surviving company level following such Change in Control shall not be deemed Good Reason within the meaning of this clause (i); (ii) a reduction by the Company in the base salary of Executive by 15% or more, unless similar such reductions occur concurrently with and apply to the Company’s senior management; (iii) a material change in the geographic location at which Executive must perform services (for purposes of the Change of Control Agreement, the relocation of Executive to a facility or a location less than 25 miles from Executive’s then-present location shall not be considered a material change in geographic location); (iv) a material reduction of facilities, perquisites or in the kind or level of employee benefits to which the Executive is entitled, unless similar such reductions occur concurrently and apply to the Company’s senior management; or (v) any material breach by the Company of any material provision of the Change of Control Agreement. Executive will not resign for Good Reason without first providing the Company with written notice of the acts or omissions constituting the grounds for “Good Reason” within 90 days of the initial existence of the grounds for “Good Reason” and a reasonable cure period of 30 days (“Cure Period”) following the date of such notice.

Stock Option Cancellation Agreement with Mr. Mackaness

In September 2015, the Company and Mr. Mackaness entered into a Stock Option Cancellation Agreement pursuant to which, among other things, the Company agreed to pay Mr. Mackaness $275,246.91 in cash in exchange for Mr. Mackaness’ agreement to cancel vested stock options exercisable for an aggregate of 92,656 shares of Common Stock. The price per share paid to Mr. Mackaness under the Stock Option Cancellation Agreement was equal to the difference between the Trading Price (defined below) and the exercise price per share under the applicable stock option. “Trading Price” means the lesser of (i) the average closing price of the Common Stock as reported on NASDAQ-Online during the period commencing on the date forty-five (45) days prior to the date of the Stock Option Cancellation Agreement and (ii) the closing price of the Common Stock as reported on NASDAQ-Online as of the date of the Stock Option Cancellation Agreement and the stock option exercises.

25

This payment to Mr. Mackaness was made using funds authorized and available under the Company’s stock repurchase program originally approved in February 2013 and as thereafter amended from time to time, and resulted in a reduction of the dollar value of shares that may yet be purchased under this program.

As a condition to the effectiveness of the Stock Option Cancellation Agreement, Mr. Mackaness also entered into a Separation Agreement and Release of Claims with the Company, which, among other things, releases the Company and its related persons from any claims relating to Mr. Mackaness’ employment with the Company.

Director Compensation

The following table provides information concerning the compensation paid by us to each of our non-employee directors for fiscal 2015. Mr. Moore did not receive additional compensation for his services as a member of our Board.

Name	Fees Earned or Paid in Cash ($)		Stock Awards ($) (1)(2)		Option Awards ($) (1)(2)		Total ($)
Sanford Fitch		40,000		20,003		—	$	60,003
Ruediger Naumann-Etienne, Ph.D.		41,000		20,003		—	$	61,003
Scott A. Shuda		34,000		20,003		—	$	54,003
George Marcellino, Ph.D.		27,000		20,003		—	$	47,003

(1) Reflects the aggregate grant date fair value of awards computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. We discuss the assumptions that we used to calculate these amounts in Note 10 to our financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 2, 2016, and incorporated by reference herein. As required by SEC rules, the amounts shown exclude the impact of estimated forfeitures related to service-based vesting conditions.

(2) As of January 2, 2016, the aggregate number of underlying options outstanding for each of our non-employee directors was:

Name	Aggregate Number of Shares Underlying Outstanding Options		Number of Securities Underlying Unvested Stock Awards
Sanford Fitch		10,000		2,513
Ruediger Naumann-Etienne, Ph.D.		15,000		2,513
Scott A. Shuda		—		2,513
George Marcellino, Ph.D.		15,000		2,513

We use a combination of cash and equity compensation to attract and retain qualified candidates to serve on our Board.

Cash Compensation

Pursuant to our non-employee director cash compensation policy, non-employee members of our Board, other than our Chairman, received an annual retainer (in each case paid in quarterly installments) of $20,000. Each member (including the chairman) of the Audit Committee received an annual retainer of $7,000, and each member (including the chairman) of the Nominating and Governance Committee and the Compensation Committee received an annual retainer of $5,000. The Chairman of the Audit Committee received an additional annual retainer of $8,000, and the Chairman of each of the Nominating and Governance Committee and the Compensation Committee received an additional annual retainer of $4,000. We reimburse members of the Board and Board committees for reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred by them in attending such meetings.

26

Equity Compensation

Pursuant to our non-employee director equity compensation policy, (i) each non-employee director automatically received an RSU grant equal to $20,000 worth of Common Stock (determined based upon the fair market value of the shares at the time such RSU award was granted) under our 2008 EIP and (ii) our non-employee Chairman of the Board automatically received an option grant to purchase 5,000 shares of Common Stock with an exercise price equal to the fair market value of the underlying shares at the time such option award was granted under our 2008 EIP. Each RSU grant vests in full on the one-year anniversary of the date of grant and the option granted to our Chairman of the Board is subject to vesting over 12 months, with 1/12th of the shares subject to the option vesting each month following the grant date, and has a term of 7 years.

Information on Compensation Risk Assessment

Management periodically reviews our incentive compensation programs at all levels within the organization. Employee cash bonuses are based on company-wide and individual performance, and management (with respect to our non-executive employees), our Compensation Committee (with respect to our executive officers, other than our CEO), and the Board of Directors (with respect to our CEO) have discretion to adjust bonus payouts. Equity awards for new hires are based on the employee’s position, prior experience, qualifications, and the market for particular types of talent, and any additional grants are based on employee performance and retention requirements. Equity awards have long-term vesting requirements to ensure that recipients’ focus is on our long-term success. The incentive compensation structure was reviewed during fiscal year 2015 by the Compensation Committee which determined that it does not believe that our compensation policies and practices, taken as a whole, are reasonably likely to have a material adverse impact on our Company.

27

AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT

General

The Audit Committee of the Board is responsible for overseeing the accounting and financial reporting processes of the Company and the audits of the Company’s consolidated financial statements, as well as assisting the Board with overseeing and monitoring the integrity of the Company’s consolidated financial statements, the Company’s compliance with legal and regulatory requirements, the independent registered public accounting firm’s qualifications, independence and performance, and the Company’s internal accounting and financial controls.

Review with Management

The Audit Committee reviewed and discussed our audited consolidated financial statements for fiscal year 2015 ended January 2, 2016, together with the notes thereto, with management, which has primary responsibility for the consolidated financial statements. Burr Pilger Mayer, Inc., our independent registered public accounting firm, is responsible for expressing an opinion on the conformity of the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

Review and Discussions with Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Audit Committee has reviewed with the independent registered public accounting firm the matters required to be discussed by Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (“PCAOB”) Auditing Standard No. 16, “Communication with Audit Committees,” including a discussion with management and the independent public accountants about the quality (and not merely the acceptability) of the Company’s accounting principles, the reasonableness of significant estimates, judgments and the transparency of disclosures in the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In addition, the Audit Committee reviewed and discussed with Burr Pilger Mayer, Inc. matters related to its independence, including a review of audit and non-audit fees and the written disclosures in the letter from Burr Pilger Mayer, Inc. to the Audit Committee required by applicable requirements of the PCAOB regarding the independent registered public accounting firm’s communication with the Audit Committee concerning independence. The Audit Committee concluded that Burr Pilger Mayer, Inc.is independent from the Company and its management.

Conclusion

Based on the review and discussions referred to above, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board that the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements be included in its Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal year 2015 ended January 2, 2016 for filing with the SEC.

AUDIT COMMITTEE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

Sanford Fitch (Chairman)

George Marcellino, Ph.D.

Ruediger Naumann-Etienne, Ph.D.

28

CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS

Other than the compensation arrangements with our directors and executive officers discussed above in the section titled “Executive Compensation,”, there were no transactions since January 3, 2015 or currently proposed transactions in which we have been a participant and:

• the amounts involved exceeded or will exceed $120,000; and

• any of our directors, nominees for director, executive officers or holders of more than five percent of our outstanding capital stock, or any immediate family member of, or person sharing the household with, any of these individuals or entities, had or will have a direct or indirect material interest.

Transactions with BlueLine Capital Partners, LLC

On August 31, 2007, the Company entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement with BlueLine Capital Partners, LLC (“BlueLine”). Pursuant to provisions of the Securities Purchase Agreement, BlueLine has the right to designate one individual for appointment to the Company’s Board. Mr. Scott A. Shuda is BlueLine’s current designee. BlueLine’s right to designate a member of the Company’s Board is subject to termination in the event that BlueLine and its affiliates hold fewer than 500,000 shares of Common Stock.

Policies and Procedures for Related Party Transactions

Our written policies and procedures adopted by the Board provide that, if any of our directors, officers or employees has a significant direct or indirect financial interest in a transaction between us and a third party, subject to specified exceptions and other than those that involve compensation, such interest must be disclosed to and approved by the Company. Our Audit Committee has the principal responsibility for reviewing and approving in advance any proposed related party transactions pursuant to these policies and procedures.

29

SECTION 16(A) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE

Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires the Company’s executive officers and directors, and persons who own more than 10% of a registered class of the Company’s equity securities to file reports of ownership and changes in ownership with the SEC. Such executive officers, directors and greater than 10% stockholders are also required by SEC rules to furnish the Company with copies of all forms that they file pursuant to Section 16(a). Specific due dates have been established by the SEC, and the Company is required to disclose in this Proxy Statement any failure to file by those dates.

Based solely on its review of the copies of such forms received by it, and written representations from certain reporting persons, the Company is not aware of any late Section 16(a) filings during the Company’s 2015 fiscal year; however, a late Form 4 was filed for William Moore on March 16, 2015 to report the acquisition of shares of Common Stock pursuant to the performance-based vesting of an award of Restricted Stock Units on February 27, 2015.

30

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT

The following table sets forth certain information known to the Company regarding the beneficial ownership of Common Stock as of April 12, 2016 by (i) each person (or group of affiliated persons) who is the beneficial owner of more than 5% of our Common Stock, (ii) each director and nominee for director, (iii) each of the Company’s executive officers named in the Summary Compensation Table appearing herein, and (iv) all of the Company’s directors and executive officers as a group.

	Beneficial Ownership as of April 12, 2016
5% Stockholders, Directors and Officers (1)	Number of Shares (2)		Percent of Total (%) (2)
BlueLine Partners, L.L.C.(3)		2,060,688		20.5	%
Paragon Associates II Joint Venture(4)		1,250,000		12.4	%
Directors
Sanford Fitch(5)		51,607		*
George Marcellino, Ph.D.(6)		9,596		*
William M. Moore(7)		360,931		3.6	%
Ruediger Naumann-Etienne, Ph.D.(8)		109,757		1.1	%
Scott A. Shuda(3)		2,060,688		20.5	%
Named Executive Officers
Ronald Steckel(9)		72,833		*
All directors and executive officers as a group (6 persons)(10)		2,665.412		26.4	%

* Represents less than 1% of the total.

(1) Unless otherwise indicated in the table, the address for each listed person is c/o IRIDEX Corporation, 1212 Terra Bella Avenue, Mountain View, CA 94043.

(2) The number and percentage of shares beneficially owned is determined under rules of the SEC, and the information is not necessarily indicative of beneficial ownership for any other purpose. Under such rules, beneficial ownership includes any shares as to which the individual has sole or shared voting power or investment power and also any shares which the individual has the right to acquire within 60 days of April 12, 2016, through the exercise of any stock option or other right. Unless otherwise indicated in the footnotes, each person has sole voting and investment power (or shares such powers with his or her spouse) with respect to the shares shown as beneficially owned. Percentage beneficially owned is based on 10,063,602 shares of Common Stock outstanding on April 12, 2016.

(3) Includes shares owned by: BlueLine Capital Partners, L.P., BlueLine Capital Partners II, LLC, BlueLine Capital Partners III, LP, and BlueLine Catalyst Fund IX, L.P., together (the “BlueLine Funds”). BlueLine Partners, L.L.C. is the sole general partner of the BlueLine Funds. Mr. Shuda is the Managing Director of BlueLine Partners, L.L.C. BlueLine Partners is located at 3480 Buskirk Avenue, Suite 214, Pleasant Hill, CA 94523. Mr. Shuda, one of our directors, shares voting and investment control over the shares owned by the BlueLine Funds and disclaims beneficial ownership of such shares except to the extent of his pecuniary interest therein.

(4) Reflects 1,250,000 shares of Common Stock held of record by Paragon Associates and Paragon Associates II Joint Venture (“Paragon JV”); Bradbury Dyer III, as the authorized agent of Paragon JV, has the power to vote and dispose of the 1,250,000shares of Common Stock held by Paragon JV. This information was obtained from a filing made with the SEC pursuant to Rule 13d-1 of the Exchange Act on November 4, 2013. Paragon Associates and Paragon JV are located at 500 Crescent Court, Suite 260, Dallas, Texas 75201.

(5) Includes 10,000 shares subject to options that are exercisable within 60 days of April 12, 2016.

(6) Includes 7,083 shares subject to options that are exercisable within 60 days of April 12, 2016.

(7) Includes 15,000 shares subject to options that are exercisable within 60 days of April 12, 2016. Mr. Moore is also the Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company.

(8) Includes 15,000 shares subject to options that are exercisable within 60 days of April 12, 2016. Includes 23,000 shares owned by the Naumann-Etienne Foundation, over which Dr. Naumann-Etienne may be deemed to share voting and dispositive power as a result of his position as president.

(9) Includes 3,958 shares subject to options that are exercisable within 60 days of April 12, 2016.

(10) Includes 51,041 shares subject to options that are exercisable within 60 days of April 12, 2016.

31

OTHER MATTERS

The Board of Directors does not know of any other matters to be presented at this meeting. If any other matters properly come before the meeting, it is the intention of the persons named in the enclosed form of Proxy to vote the shares they represent as the Board may recommend.

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

Dated: May 5, 2016

32

IRIDEX

IMPORTANT ANNUAL MEETING INFORMATION 000004

ENDORSEMENT_LINE______________ SACKPACK_____________

MR A SAMPLE

DESIGNATION (IF ANY)

ADD 1

ADD 2

ADD 3

ADD 4

ADD 5

ADD 6

C123456789

000000000.000000 ext 000000000.000000 ext

000000000.000000 ext 000000000.000000 ext

000000000.000000 ext 000000000.000000 ext

Electronic Voting Instructions

You can vote by Internet or telephone! Available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week!

Instead of mailing your proxy, you may choose one of the two voting methods outlined below to vote your proxy.

VALIDATION DETAILS ARE LOCATED BELOW IN THE TITLE BAR.

Proxies submitted by the Internet or telephone must be received by 1:00 a.m., Central Time, on June 15, 2016.

Vote by Internet

• Go to www.envisionreports.com/IRIX

• Or scan the QR code with your smartphone

• Follow the steps outlined on the secure website

Vote by telephone

• Call toll free 1-800-652-VOTE (8683) within the USA, US territories &

Canada on a touch tone telephone

• Follow the instructions provided by the recorded message

Using a black ink pen, mark your votes with an X as shown in

this example. Please do not write outside the designated areas.

X

Annual Meeting Proxy Card 1234 5678 9012 345

IF YOU HAVE NOT VOTED VIA THE INTERNET OR TELEPHONE, FOLD ALONG THE PERFORATION, DETACH AND RETURN THE BOTTOM PORTION IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE.

A Proposals — The Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR each of the nominees listed in Proposal 1, and FOR Proposals 2 and 3.

1. Election of Directors:

For Against Abstain

01 - William M. Moore

04 - Scott A. Shuda

02 - Sanford Fitch

05 - George Marcellino

For Against Abstain

03 - Ruediger Naumann-Etienne

For Against Abstain +

2. To ratify the appointment of Burr Pilger Mayer, Inc. as independent registered public accountants of the Company for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2016.

For Against Abstain

3. To approve, on a non-binding advisory basis, the compensation of our named executive officers as described in the proxy statement.

For Against Abstain

In their discretion, the proxies and attorneys-in-fact are authorized to vote upon such other matters which may properly come before the meeting and any adjournment(s) or postponement(s) thereof.

B Non-Voting Items

Change of Address — Please print new address below.

C Authorized Signatures — This section must be completed for your vote to be counted. — Date and Sign Below

This Proxy should be marked, dated, signed by the stockholder(s) exactly as his or her name appears hereon, and returned promptly in the enclosed envelope. Persons signing in a fiduciary capacity should so indicate. If shares are held by joint tenants or as community property, both should sign. If a corporation, please sign in full corporate name by authorized person. If a partnership, please sign in partnership name by authorized person.

Date (mm/dd/yyyy) — Please print date below.

Signature 1 — Please keep signature within the box.

Signature 2 — Please keep signature within the box.

C 1234567890 J N T

1UPX 2675051

MR A SAMPLE (THIS AREA IS SET UP TO ACCOMMODATE

140 CHARACTERS) MR A SAMPLE AND MR A SAMPLE AND

MR A SAMPLE AND MR A SAMPLE AND MR A SAMPLE AND

MR A SAMPLE AND MR A SAMPLE AND MR A SAMPLE AND

+

02CLTA

IRIDEX

IF YOU HAVE NOT VOTED VIA THE INTERNET OR TELEPHONE, FOLD ALONG THE PERFORATION, DETACH AND RETURN THE BOTTOM PORTION IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE.

Proxy — IRIDEX Corporation

THIS PROXY IS SOLICITED ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

2016 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

June 15, 2016

The undersigned stockholder of IRIDEX Corporation, a Delaware corporation (“IRIDEX”), hereby acknowledges receipt of the Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders and Proxy Statement, each dated May 5, 2016, and hereby appoints William M. Moore and Romeo Dizon, or either of them, proxies and attorneys-in-fact, with full power to each of substitution, on behalf and in the name of the undersigned, to represent the undersigned at the 2016 Annual Meeting of Stockholders of IRIDEX to be held on June 15, 2016, at 10:00 a.m., Pacific Daylight Savings Time, at the principal offices of IRIDEX located at 1212 Terra Bella, Mountain View, California 94043, and at any adjournment(s) or postponement(s) thereof and to vote all shares of Common Stock of IRIDEX which the undersigned would be entitled to vote if then and there personally present, on the matters set forth on the reverse side of this Proxy.

This proxy will be voted as directed or, if no contrary direction is indicated, will be voted FOR the election of each of the nominees listed, FOR ratification of the appointment of Burr Pilger Mayer, Inc. as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, FOR non-binding approval the compensation of our named executive officers as described in the proxy statement, and as said proxies deem advisable on such other matters as may come before the meeting and any adjournment(s) or postponement(s) thereof. The Board of Directors unanimously recommends a vote “FOR” each of the nominees listed in Proposal 1, and “FOR” Proposals 2 and 3.

CONTINUED AND TO BE SIGNED ON REVERSE SIDE