XML 27 R8.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.2.0.727
BASIS OF PRESENTATION
9 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2015
Accounting Policies [Abstract]  
BASIS OF PRESENTATION
BASIS OF PRESENTATION:
The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for interim financial information and with instructions to Form 10-Q and Rule 10-01 of Regulation S-X. In accordance with Rule 10-01, the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements do not include all of the information and footnotes required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for complete consolidated financial statements. The accompanying year-end condensed consolidated balance sheet was derived from audited financial statements, but does not include all disclosures required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. In management's opinion, all adjustments, including normal recurring accruals and adjustments, necessary for a fair statement of the Authority's operating results for the interim period, have been included. In addition, certain amounts in the accompanying 2014 supplemental condensed consolidating financial statements have been reclassified to conform to the 2015 presentation.
The gaming market in the Northeastern United States is seasonal in nature, with peak gaming activities often occurring at Mohegan Sun and Mohegan Sun Pocono during the months of May through August. Accordingly, the Authority's operating results for the three months and nine months ended June 30, 2015 are not necessarily indicative of operating results for other interim periods or an entire fiscal year.
The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in the Authority's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2014.
Principles of Consolidation
The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Authority and its majority and wholly-owned subsidiaries and entities. In accordance with authoritative guidance issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (the “FASB”) pertaining to consolidation of variable interest entities, the accounts of Salishan-Mohegan are consolidated into the accounts of Mohegan Ventures-NW and the accounts of NEBW are consolidated into the accounts of Mohegan Lacrosse as Mohegan Ventures-NW and Mohegan Lacrosse are deemed to be the primary beneficiaries. In consolidation, all inter-company balances and transactions were eliminated.







Long-Term Receivables
Long-term receivables consist primarily of receivables from affiliates and others and were primarily included in other assets, net, in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets. The following table presents a reconciliation of long-term receivables, including current portions, and the related reserves for doubtful collection of these long-term receivables (in thousands):
 
Long-Term Receivables
 
Affiliates
 
Others
 
Total
Balance, March 31, 2015 (1)
$
91,567

 
$
2,590

 
$
94,157

Additions:
 
 
 
 
 
   Issuance of affiliate advances and other loans, including interest receivable
3,803

 
68

 
3,871

Deductions:
 
 
 
 
 
   Payments received

 
(40
)
 
(40
)
   Adjustments

 
(779
)
 
(779
)
Balance, June 30, 2015 (1)
$
95,370

 
$
1,839

 
$
97,209

 
 
 
 
 
 
Balance, September 30, 2014 (1)
$
66,596

 
$
2,612

 
$
69,208

Additions:
 
 
 
 
 
   Issuance of affiliate advances and other loans, including interest receivable
8,823

 
123

 
8,946

   Cowlitz Project land value transfer (2)
19,951

 

 
19,951

Deductions:
 
 
 
 
 
   Payments received

 
(117
)
 
(117
)
   Adjustments

 
(779
)
 
(779
)
Balance, June 30, 2015 (1)
$
95,370

 
$
1,839

 
$
97,209

__________
(1)
Includes interest receivable of $41.0 million, $39.3 million and $35.7 million as of June 30, 2015, March 31, 2015 and September 30, 2014, respectively. The WTG receivables no longer accrue interest pursuant to a release and reimbursement agreement entered into in September 2010.
(2)
Relates to the transfer of land for the proposed Cowlitz Project site between Salishan-Mohegan and the Cowlitz Tribe (refer to Note 7).

 
Reserves for Doubtful Collection of Long-Term Receivables
 
Affiliates        
 
Others        
 
Total             
Balance, March 31, 2015
$
28,557

 
$
821

 
$
29,378

Additions:
 
 
 
 
 
   Charges to bad debt expense
923

 
5

 
928

Deductions:
 
 
 
 
 
   Adjustments

 
(781
)
 
(781
)
Balance, June 30, 2015
$
29,480

 
$
45

 
$
29,525

 
 
 
 
 
 
Balance, September 30, 2014
$
26,833

 
$
796

 
$
27,629

Additions:
 
 
 
 
 
   Charges to bad debt expense
2,647

 
35

 
2,682

Deductions:
 
 
 
 
 
   Adjustments

 
(786
)
 
(786
)
Balance, June 30, 2015
$
29,480

 
$
45

 
$
29,525


Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The fair value amounts presented below are reported to satisfy disclosure requirements pursuant to authoritative guidance issued by the FASB pertaining to disclosures about fair values of financial instruments and are not necessarily indicative of amounts that the Authority could realize in a current market transaction.
The Authority applies the following fair value hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs utilized to measure fair value into three levels:
Level 1 - Quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in active markets;
Level 2 - Quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in inactive markets or valuations based on models where the significant inputs are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data; and
Level 3 - Valuations based on models where the significant inputs are unobservable. The unobservable inputs reflect the Authority's estimates or assumptions that market participants would utilize in pricing such assets or liabilities.
The Authority's assessment of the significance of a particular input requires judgment and may affect the valuation of financial assets and liabilities and their placement within the fair value hierarchy.
The carrying amount of cash and cash equivalents, receivables, trade payables and promissory notes and certain credit facilities approximates fair value. The estimated fair value of the Authority's financing facilities and notes were as follows (in thousands):
 
June 30, 2015
 
Carrying Value         
 
Fair Value         
Senior Secured Credit Facility - Revolving
$
8,000

 
$
7,910

Senior Secured Credit Facility - Term Loan A
$
113,654

 
$
113,064

Senior Secured Credit Facility - Term Loan B
$
712,270

 
$
714,556

2013 9 3/4% Senior Unsecured Notes
$
500,000

 
$
528,750

2012 11% Senior Subordinated Notes
$
272,233

 
$
276,222


The estimated fair values of the Authority's financing facilities and notes were based on Level 2 inputs (quoted market prices or prices of similar instruments) on or about June 30, 2015.
Impairment of Project Horizon
In September 2008, the Authority suspended certain elements of its Project Horizon expansion due to a slowdown in business volumes and uncertainties in the financial markets. Costs incurred on the suspended elements related to excavation and foundation work for a planned podium and new hotel tower, as well as professional fees for design and architectural work. During its fourth quarter ended September 30, 2010, the Authority re-evaluated its plans with respect to the development of the new hotel element of the project, and based on a modified plan, which encompassed a smaller hotel to be located closer to the existing hotel, determined that certain assets related to the suspended elements did not have any future benefit to the Authority. Accordingly, in fiscal 2010, the Authority recorded a related $58.1 million impairment charge. During its fourth quarter ended September 30, 2014, the Authority further re-evaluated its modified plan, which included a hotel to be developed and owned by an instrumentality of the Tribe, as well as a third-party developed and owned retail center, and, based on new design plans, including the final location of the planned hotel, determined that certain design and earthwork related assets did not have any future benefit to the Authority. Accordingly, in fiscal 2014, the Authority recorded an additional $5.0 million impairment charge.
In March 2015, the Mohegan Tribal Finance Authority (“MTFA”), a wholly-owned instrumentality of the Tribe, agreed to develop the planned hotel. The Authority received approximately $1.3 million as payment for the carrying value of the remaining hotel related assets which were transferred to MTFA. Concurrent with this transaction, the Authority re-evaluated the planned third-party developed and owned retail center, including master planning costs, and determined that these elements of the project were no longer feasible at this time. Accordingly, the Authority determined that the related assets did not have any future benefit, and, during its second quarter ended March 31, 2015, the Authority recognized a related $2.5 million impairment charge, which was recorded in the accompanying condensed consolidated statement of income for the nine months ended June 30, 2015. As of March 31, 2015, there were no assets remaining related to the suspended elements of Project Horizon.
New Accounting Standards
In May 2014, the FASB issued an accounting standard update on revenue recognition that will be applied to all contracts with customers. The update requires an entity to recognize revenue when it transfers promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects what it expects in exchange for the goods or services. It also requires more detailed disclosures to enable users of financial statements to understand the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from contracts with customers. This guidance will be required to be applied on a retrospective basis, using one of two methodologies, and was to be effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016, with early application not being permitted. However, in July 2015, the FASB deferred the effective date by one year. This guidance will now be effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, and interim reporting periods thereafter. Entities are permitted to adopt the guidance as of the original effective date. The Authority is currently evaluating the impact that this guidance will have on its financial position and results of operations.
In August 2014, the FASB issued an accounting standard update which provides guidance on determining when and how to disclose going concern uncertainties in the financial statements. The update requires management to perform interim and annual assessments of an entity's ability to continue as a going concern within one year of the date the financial statements are issued. It also requires management to provide certain disclosures if conditions or events raise substantial doubt about the entity's ability to continue as a going concern. This guidance will be required for annual reporting periods ending after December 15, 2016, and interim reporting periods thereafter, with early application permitted. The Authority is currently evaluating the impact that this guidance will have on its financial position and results of operations.
In February 2015, the FASB issued an accounting standards update which amends existing requirements applicable to reporting entities that are required to evaluate whether certain legal entities should be consolidated. This guidance will be required to be applied either on a retrospective or modified retrospective basis and will be effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2015, and interim reporting periods thereafter, with early application permitted. The Authority is currently evaluating the impact that this guidance will have on its financial position and results of operations.
In April 2015, the FASB issued an accounting standard update to clarify the required presentation of debt issuance costs. The update requires that debt issuance costs be presented in the balance sheet as a direct reduction from the carrying amount of the related debt liability rather than as an asset. This guidance will be required to be applied on a retrospective basis and will be effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2015, and interim reporting periods thereafter, with early application permitted. The Authority plans to adopt this guidance for its annual reporting period ending September 30, 2015 and is currently evaluating the impact on its financial position and results of operations.