XML 30 R17.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.7.0.1
Goodwill and Intangible Assets
12 Months Ended
Mar. 31, 2017
Goodwill and Intangible Assets Disclosure [Abstract]  
Goodwill and Intangible Assets
Goodwill and Intangible Assets

As discussed in Note 2, goodwill is not amortized but is tested for impairment at least annually, in accordance with the provisions of ASC Topic 350-20-35-1.  Goodwill impairment is deemed to exist if the net book value of a reporting unit exceeds its estimated fair value.  The fair value of a reporting unit is determined using a discounted cash flow methodology.  The Company’s reporting units are determined based upon whether discrete financial information is available and reviewed regularly, whether those units constitute a business, and the extent of economic similarities and interdependencies between those reporting units for purposes of aggregation.  The Company’s reporting units identified under ASC Topic 350-20-35-33 are at the component level, or one level below the operating segment level as defined under ASC Topic 280-10-50-10 “Segment Reporting – Disclosure.” The Company has four reporting units as of March 31, 2017 and 2016.  Only two of the four reporting units carried goodwill at March 31, 2017 and only two of the four reporting units carried goodwill at March 31, 2016. The Duff-Norton reporting unit (which designs, manufactures, and sources mechanical and electromechanical actuators and rotary unions) had goodwill of $9,555,000 and $9,627,000 at March 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively, and the Rest of Products reporting unit (representing the hoist, chain, and forgings, digital power control systems, and distribution businesses) had goodwill of $309,744,000 and $161,089,000 at March 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively. Both Magnetek and STAHL have been determined to be part of the Rest of Products reporting unit.


When we evaluate the potential for goodwill impairment, we assess a range of qualitative factors including, but not limited to, macroeconomic conditions, industry conditions, the competitive environment, changes in the market for our products and services, regulatory and political developments, entity specific factors such as strategy and changes in key personnel, and overall financial performance. If, after completing this assessment, it is determined that it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying value or if economic or other business factors indicate that the fair value of our reporting units may have declined since our last quantitative test, we proceed to a two-step impairment test. The Company performed its qualitative assessment as of February 28, 2017 and determined that the two-step goodwill impairment test should be performed for both the Rest of Products reporting unit and the Duff-Norton reporting unit.  

In accordance with ASC Topic 350-20-35-3, the measurement of impairment of goodwill consists of two steps. In the first step, the Company compares the fair value of each reporting unit to its carrying value. As part of the impairment analysis, the Company determines the fair value of each of its reporting units with goodwill using the income approach and market approach. The income approach uses a discounted cash flow methodology to determine fair value. This methodology recognizes value based on the expected receipt of future economic benefits. Key assumptions in the income approach include a free cash flow projection, an estimated discount rate, a long-term growth rate, and a terminal value. These assumptions are based upon the Company’s historical experience, current market trends and future expectations.

The Company performed step one of the two-step impairment test for the Rest of Products and Duff-Norton reporting units as of February 28, 2017. Based on the results of the two-step impairment test, the Company determined that the Rest of Products and Duff-Norton reporting units' fair values were not less than their applicable carrying values.

Future impairment indicators, such as declines in forecasted cash flows, may cause additional significant impairment charges. Impairment charges could be based on such factors as the Company’s stock price, forecasted cash flows, assumptions used, control premiums, or other variables.

In accordance with ASC Topic 350-30-35, indefinite-lived intangible assets that are not subject to amortization shall be tested for impairment annually or more frequently if events or circumstances indicate that it is more likely than not that an asset is impaired. The Company assessed its indefinite-lived intangible assets consisting of trademarks as of February 28, 2017 and determined that the indefinite-lived STB intangible trademark asset was fully impaired. The impairment was due to lower cash flows and royalty rates than at the time of the acquisition. The total impairment loss of $1,125,000 has been recorded within intangible asset impairment on the Company's statement of operations.
 
Identifiable intangible assets acquired in a business combination are amortized over their estimated useful lives.

A summary of changes in goodwill during the years ended March 31, 2017 and 2016 is as follows:

Balance at April 1, 2015
$
121,461

STB purchase accounting adjustment
(1,669
)
Acquisition of Magnetek (See Note 3)
49,204

Currency translation
1,720

Balance at March 31, 2016
$
170,716

Acquisition of STAHL (See Note 3)
150,322

Currency translation
(1,739
)
Balance at March 31, 2017
$
319,299



Goodwill is recognized net of accumulated impairment losses of $107,000,000 as of March 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively. There were no goodwill impairment losses recorded in fiscal 2017, 2016, or 2015.


Intangible assets at March 31, 2017 are as follows:

 
 
Gross
Carrying 
Amount
 
Accumulated
Amortization
 
 
Net
Trademark
 
$
5,151

 
$
(2,616
)
 
$
2,535

Indefinite-lived trademark
 
46,018

 

 
46,018

Customer relationships
 
177,983

 
(14,873
)
 
163,110

Acquired technology
 
46,574

 
(4,603
)
 
41,971

Other
 
3,471

 
(922
)
 
2,549

Balance at March 31, 2017
 
$
279,197

 
$
(23,014
)
 
$
256,183


Intangible assets at March 31, 2016 were as follows:

 
 
Gross
 Carrying
 Amount
 
Accumulated
 Amortization
 
 
Net
Trademark
 
$
5,467

 
$
(2,431
)
 
$
3,036

Indefinite-lived trademark
 
29,006

 

 
29,006

Customer relationships
 
58,535

 
(10,688
)
 
47,847

Acquired technology
 
43,198

 
(1,873
)
 
41,325

Other
 
1,481

 
(566
)
 
915

Balance at March 31, 2016
 
$
137,687

 
$
(15,558
)
 
$
122,129



The Company’s intangible assets that are considered to have finite lives are amortized over the period in which the assets are expected to generate future cash flows.  The weighted-average amortization periods are 18 years for trademarks, 18 years for customer relationships, 18 years for acquired technology, 6 years for other, and 18 years in total. Trademarks with a book value of $46,018,000 have an indefinite useful life and are therefore not being amortized. Total amortization expense was $8,105,000, $5,024,000, and $2,266,000 for fiscal 2017, 2016, and 2015, respectively.  Based on the current amount of intangible assets, the estimated amortization expense for each of the succeeding five years is expected to be approximately $14,000,000.