United States

Securities and Exchange Commission

Washington, D. C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

x Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

for the quarterly period ended December 31, 2009

¨ Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

For the transition period from              to             

Commission File Number: 0-28032

PATAPSCO BANCORP, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Maryland	52-1951797
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)	(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

1301 Merritt Boulevard, Dundalk, Maryland 21222-2194

(Address of Principal Executive Offices)

(410) 285-1010

Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code

Check whether the issuer (1) filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  x    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (Section 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    Yes  ¨    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one)

Large Accelerated Filer	¨	Accelerated Filer	¨
Non-Accelerated Filer	¨  (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)	Smaller Reporting Company	x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    Yes  ¨    No  x

As of February 9, 2010, the issuer had 1,884,968 shares of Common Stock issued and outstanding.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

		PAGE
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1.	Financial Statements
	Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition at December 31, 2009 and June 30, 2009 (Unaudited)	3
	Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Six and Three-Month Periods Ended December 31, 2009 and 2008 (Unaudited)	4
	Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income/(Loss) for the Six and Three-Month Periods Ended December 31, 2009 and 2008 (Unaudited)	5
	Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Six-Month Periods Ended December 31, 2009 and 2008 (Unaudited)	6
	Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)	7
Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	16
Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	26
Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	26
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1.	Legal Proceedings	27
Item 1A.	Risk Factors	27
Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	27
Item 3.	Defaults in Senior Securities	27
Item 4.	Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders	27
Item 5.	Other Information	27
Item 6.	Exhibits	27
Signatures		28
Certifications

2

Part I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements

Patapsco Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiary

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION

(unaudited)

($ in thousands except for share data)

	December 31, 2009			June 30, 2009
Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents:
Cash on hand and due from banks	$	5,475		$	6,143
Interest bearing deposits in other banks		6,407			13,651
Total cash and cash equivalents		11,882			19,794
Securities available for sale		17,092			16,084
Loans receivable, net of allowance for loan losses of $3,333 and $3,023, respectively		212,444			216,927
Investment in securities required by law, at cost		2,847			2,817
Real estate acquired through foreclosure		4,377			1,265
Property and equipment, net		3,835			3,965
Core deposit intangible		219			246
Accrued interest and other assets		8,361			7,269
Total assets	$	261,057		$	268,367
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
Liabilities:
Deposits:
Non-interest bearing deposits	$	10,667		$	11,287
Interest bearing deposits		202,161			196,508
Total deposits		212,828			207,795
Long-term debt		22,100			34,300
Junior subordinated debentures		5,000			5,000
Accrued expenses and other liabilities		1,362			1,580
Total liabilities		241,290			248,675
Stockholders’ equity:
Preferred Stock – Series A Cumulative perpetual; $0.01 par value; authorized 1,000,000 shares with a liquidation preference of $1,000 per share; 6,000 shares outstanding		5,732			5,698
Warrant Preferred stock – Series B Cumulative perpetual; $0.01 par value; authorized 1,000,000 shares with a liquidation preference of $1,000 per share; 300 shares outstanding		330			334
Common stock $0.01 par value; authorized 4,000,000 shares; issued and outstanding 1,884,968 and 1,864,974 shares, respectively		19			19
Additional paid in capital		7,465			7,411
Obligation under Deferred Compensation		454			454
Deferred compensation contra		(78	)		(78	)
Retained income, substantially restricted		5,778			5,866
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net of income taxes (benefit)		67			(12	)
Total stockholders’ equity		19,767			19,692
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	261,057		$	268,367

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

3

Patapsco Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiary

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(unaudited)

($ in thousands except for per share data)	For Six Months Ended December 31,						For Three Months Ended December 31,
	2009			2008			2009			2008
Interest income:
Loans receivable, including fees	$	6,913		$	7,984		$	3,357		$	3,994
Securities, including securities required by law		325			272			163			132
Federal funds sold and other investments		15			27			5			12
Total interest income		7,253			8,283			3,525			4,138
Interest expense:
Deposits		2,247			2,739			1,039			1,378
Short-term debt		6			66			—			26
Long-term debt and subordinated debentures		634			872			304			430
Total interest expense		2,887			3,677			1,343			1,834
Net interest income		4,366			4,606			2,182			2,304
Provision for loan losses		792			1,560			398			1,310
Net interest income after provision for loan losses		3,574			3,046			1,784			994
Non-interest income:
Fees and service charges		357			364			169			176
Gain on sale of other repossessed assets		—			10			—			—
Other		48			52			22			22
Total non-interest income		405			426			191			198
Non-interest expense:
Compensation and employee benefits		2,127			2,451			1,046			1,215
Professional fees		261			153			145			79
Federal deposit insurance assessments		254			18			122			9
Equipment expense		107			170			51			75
Net occupancy expense		283			301			138			152
Advertising		22			34			7			27
Data processing		201			257			102			141
Amortization of core deposit intangible		26			26			13			13
Telephone, postage & delivery		141			139			69			70
Other		396			420			207			214
Total non-interest expense		3,818			3,969			1,900			1,994
Income/(loss) before provision/(benefit) for income taxes		161			(497	)		75			(802	)
Provision/(benefit) for income taxes		56			(203	)		26			(319	)
Net Income/(loss)	$	105		$	(294	)	$	49		$	(483	)
Preferred stock dividends		163			13			82			13
Net loss available for common shareholders	$	(58	)	$	(307	)	$	(33	)	$	(496	)
Basic loss per common share	$	(.03	)	$	(0.16	)	$	(0.02	)	$	(0.26	)
Diluted loss per common share	$	(.03	)	$	(0.16	)	$	(0.02	)	$	(0.26	)
Cash dividends declared per common share	$	—		$	0.07		$	—		$	0.00

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

4

Patapsco Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiary

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME/(LOSS)

(unaudited)

($ in thousands)

	For Six Months Ended					For Three Months Ended
	December 31,					December 31,
	2009		2008			2009			2008
Net income/(loss)	$	105	$	(294	)	$	49		$	(483	)
Other comprehensive income/(loss), net of income taxes/(benefit):
Unrealized net holding gain/(loss) on securities available-for-sale, net of income taxes/(benefit) of $51, $103, ($67), and $154, respectively		79		158			(103	)		236
Comprehensive income/(loss)	$	184	$	(136	)	$	(54	)	$	(247	)

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

5

Patapsco Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiary

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(unaudited)

($ in thousands)	For the Six Months Ended December 31,
	2009			2008
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net Income/(loss)	$	105		$	(294	)
Adjustments to reconcile net income/(loss) to net cash provided by/(used in) operating activities:
Amortization of premiums and discounts, net		144			18
Amortization of deferred loan origination costs		3			1
Provision for loan losses		792			1,560
Depreciation		140			168
Amortization of core deposit intangible		26			26
Increase in cash surrender value of bank owned life insurance		(33	)		(36	)
Increase in accrued interest and other assets		(1,075	)		(751	)
Non-cash compensation under stock-based benefit plan		30			47
Increase/(decrease) in accrued expenses and other liabilities		(227	)		138
Net cash provided by/(used in) operating activities		(95	)		877
Cash flows from investing activities:
Proceeds from maturity of investments and principal repayments on mortgage-backed securities		6,137			2,579
Purchase of securities available for sale		(7,139	)		(1,636	)
Net change in loans		555			(6,924	)
Net change in investments required by law		(30	)		(66	)
Purchase of property and equipment		(10	)		(97	)
Net cash used in investing activities		(487	)		(6,144	)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Net increase in deposits		6,175			118
Decrease in advance payments by borrowers		(1,142	)		(1,116	)
Net increase in short-term borrowings		—			3,000
Proceeds from long-term borrowings		—			17,500
Payments on long-term borrowings		(12,200	)		(17,500	)
Cash received from issuance of preferred stock		—			5,661
Cash received from issuance of warrant preferred stock		—			339
Dividends paid		(163	)		(261	)
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities		(7,330	)		7,741
Net increase/(decrease) in cash and cash equivalents		(7,912	)		2,474
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period		19,794			9,193
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	11,882		$	11,667
Supplemental cash flow information:
Interest paid on deposits and borrowed funds	$	2,996		$	3,740
Income taxes paid		173			310
Non-cash disclosures:
Loans transferred to real estate acquired through foreclosure, net	$	3,112		$	—

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

6

Patapsco Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiary

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

Note 1: Principles of Consolidation

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Patapsco Bancorp, Inc. (the “Company” or “Patapsco Bancorp”) and its wholly-owned subsidiary, The Patapsco Bank (the “Bank”). The Patapsco Bank’s wholly owned subsidiaries are Prime Business Leasing and Patapsco Financial Services, Inc. All inter-company accounts and transactions have been eliminated in the accompanying consolidated financial statements.

Note 2: The Patapsco Bank

The Bank is regulated by The Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond (the “Federal Reserve Bank”) and The State of Maryland. The primary business of the Bank is to attract deposits from individual and corporate customers and to originate residential and commercial mortgage loans, consumer loans and commercial business loans. The Bank competes with other financial and mortgage institutions in attracting and retaining deposits and originating loans.

Note 3: FASB Launched Accounting Standards Codification

The Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) has issued the “FASB Accounting Standards Codification™” (“Codification” or “ASC”). The Codification establishes the single source of authoritative U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) to be applied by nongovernmental entities. The Codification supersedes all existing accounting and reporting standards. All other nongrandfathered accounting literature not included in the Codification will become nonauthoritative. The FASB will not issue new standards in the form of Statements, FASB Staff Positions or Emerging Issues Task Force Abstracts. Instead, it issues Accounting Standards Updates, which display an issue date expressed as the year with a sequential number for each update and serve to update the Codification, provide background information about the guidance and provide the basis for conclusions on the changes to the Codification. GAAP is not intended to be changed as a result of the FASB’s Codification project, but it changed the way the guidance is organized and presented. As a result, these changes have a significant impact on how companies reference GAAP in their financial statements and in their accounting policies for financial statements issued for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. The Company has implemented the Codification in this quarterly report.

Note 4: Basis of Presentation

The accompanying consolidated statement of financial condition at June 30, 2009, which has been derived from audited statements, and unaudited interim consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with instructions for Form 10-Q and therefore, do not include all disclosures necessary for a complete presentation of the financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. However, all adjustments that are, in the opinion of management, necessary for the fair presentation of the interim financial statements have been included. Such adjustments were of a normal recurring nature. The results of operations for the three and six months ended December 31, 2009 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the entire year. For additional information, refer to the consolidated financial statements and footnotes thereto included in the Company’s Annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2009.

Note 5: Subsequent Events

In accordance with ASC Topic 855, “Subsequent Events,” management has evaluated potential subsequent events through February 9, 2010, the date the financial statements were issued and has determined that this guidance did not have an impact on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or earnings per share.

Note 6: Recent Accounting Pronouncements

ASC Topics 810 and 860

In June 2009, the FASB issued ASC Topic 810, Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets”, and ASC Topic 860, “Amendments to FASB Interpretation No. 46(R)”. These standards are effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2009. ASC Topic 860 eliminates the concept of a qualifying special-purpose entity (“QSPE”) and changes some of the requirements for derecognizing financial assets. ASC Topic 810 amends the consolidation guidance related to QSPE’s. Specifically, the amendments will (a) eliminate the exemption for QSPEs from the new

7

guidance, (b) shift the determination of which enterprise should consolidate a variable interest entity (“VIE”) to a current control approach, such that an entity that has both the power to make decisions and right to receive benefits or absorb losses that could potentially be significant, will consolidate a VIE, and (c) change when it is necessary to reassess who should consolidate a VIE. The Company is evaluating the impact that these standards will have on its financial statements. We have not determined the effect that the adoption of ASC Topics 810 and 860 will have on our financial position or results of operations.

International Financial Reporting Standards

In November 2008, the SEC released a proposed roadmap regarding the potential use by U.S. issuers of financial statements prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS). IFRS is a comprehensive series of accounting standards published by the International Accounting Standards Board (“IASB”). Under the proposed roadmap, the Company may be required to prepare financial statements in accordance with IFRS as early as 2014. The SEC will make a determination in 2011 regarding the mandatory adoption of IFRS. The Company is currently assessing the impact that this potential change would have on its consolidated financial statements, and it will continue to monitor the development of the potential implementation of IFRS.

Note 7: Securities Available for Sale

Investment securities, classified as available for sale, are summarized as follows as of:

	December 31, 2009
(In thousands)	Amortized Cost		Unrealized Gains		Unrealized Losses			Fair Value
Corporate Bonds	$	2,980	$	81	$	(28	)	$	3,033
U.S. Government agencies		8,115		6		(103	)		8,018
Mortgage-backed securities		5,889		158		(6	)		6,041
	$	16,984	$	245	$	(137	)	$	17,092
	June 30, 2009
(In thousands)	Amortized Cost		Unrealized Gains		Unrealized Losses			Fair Value
Corporate Bonds	$	2,980	$	5	$	(167	)	$	2,818
U.S. Government agencies		6,586		3		(13	)		6,576
Mortgage-backed securities		6,539		155		(4	)		6,690
	$	16,105	$	163	$	(184	)	$	16,084

The scheduled maturities of securities available for sale at December 31, 2009 are as follows:

(In thousands)	Amortized Cost		Fair Value
Due in less than one year	$	1,001	$	1,023
Due in one to five years		866		862
Due after five through ten years		9,028		9,050
Due after ten years		6,089		6,157
	$	16,984	$	17,092

8

The following table shows the Company’s investment securities’ gross unrealized losses and fair value, aggregated by investment category and length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position, at:

	December 31, 2009
	Less than 12 Months					12 Months or More					Total
(In thousands)	Fair Value		Unrealized Losses			Fair Value		Unrealized Losses			Fair Value		Unrealized Losses
U.S. Government agencies	$	6,997	$	(103	)	$	—	$	—		$	6,997	$	(103	)
Corporate Bonds		—		—			972		(28	)		972		(28	)
Mortgage-backed securities		2,181		(6	)		—		—			2,181		(6	)
Total Temporarily Impaired Securities	$	9,178	$	(109	)	$	972	$	(28	)	$	10,150	$	(137	)
	June 30, 2009
	Less than 12 Months					12 Months or More					Total
(In Thousands)	Fair Value		Unrealized Losses			Fair Value		Unrealized Losses			Fair Value		Unrealized Losses
U.S. Government agencies	$	3,565	$	(13	)	$	—	$	—		$	3,565	$	(13	)
Corporate Bonds		—		—			2,311		(167	)		2,311		(167	)
Mortgage-backed securities		—		—			1,077		(4	)		1,077		(4	)
Total Temporarily Impaired Securities	$	3,565	$	(13	)	$	3,388	$	(171	)	$	6,953	$	(184	)

There were no sales of securities during the six months ended December 31, 2009.

At December 31, 2009, the Company had four securities in an unrealized loss position. Unrealized losses detailed above relate primarily to U.S. Government agency bonds. The decline in fair value is considered temporary and is primarily due to interest rate fluctuations. The Company does not have the intent to sell these securities, and it is more likely than not that it will not be required to sell the securities prior to their recovery. None of the individual unrealized losses are significant.

The carrying amount of Federal Reserve Bank and Federal Home Loan Bank stocks totals $2.8 million and are considered restricted as to marketability. Management evaluates the Company’s restricted stock in the FHLB for impairment in accordance with ASC Topic 350, “Accounting by Certain Entities (Including With Trade Receivables) That Lend to or Finance The Activities of Others.” Management’s determination of whether this investment is impaired is based on their assessment of the ultimate recoverability of their cost rather than by recognizing temporary declines in value. The determination of whether a decline affects the ultimate recoverability of their cost is influenced by criteria such as (1) the significance of the decline in net assets of the FHLB as compared to the capital stock amount for the FHLB and the length of time this situation has persisted, (2) commitments by the FHLB to make payments required by law or regulation and the level of such payments in relation to the operating performance of the FHLB, and (3) the impact of legislative and regulatory changes on institutions and, accordingly, on the customer base of the FHLB. The Company has concluded that the restricted stock investment is not impaired as of December 31, 2009.

9

Note 8: Preferred Stock

On December 19, 2008, as part of the Troubled Asset Relief Program’s (“TARP”) Capital Purchase Program, the Company entered into a Letter Agreement, and the related Securities Purchase Agreement – Standard Terms (collectively, the “Purchase Agreement”), with the United States Department of the Treasury (“Treasury”), pursuant to which the Company issued (i) 6,000 shares of Fixed Rate Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock, Series A, liquidation preference of $1,000 per share (“Series A preferred stock”), and (ii) a warrant to purchase an additional $300,000 in preferred stock (“Series B preferred stock”), for an aggregate purchase price of $6.0 million.

The Series A preferred stock qualifies as Tier 1 capital and pays cumulative dividends at a rate of 5% per annum until February 15, 2014. Beginning February 15, 2014, the dividend rate will increase to 9% per annum. On and after February 15, 2012, the Company may, at its option, redeem shares of Series A preferred stock, in whole or in part, at any time and from time to time, for cash at a per share amount equal to the sum of the liquidation preference per share plus any accrued and unpaid dividends to but excluding the redemption date. Prior to February 15, 2012, the Company may redeem shares of Series A preferred stock only if it has received aggregate gross proceeds of not less than $1,500,000 from one or more qualified equity offerings, and the aggregate redemption price may not exceed the net proceeds received by the Company from such offerings. The redemption of the Series A preferred stock requires prior regulatory approval.

On December 19, 2008, Treasury exercised all of the warrants on the Series B preferred stock at the exercise price of $0.01 per share. The Series B preferred stock qualifies as Tier 1 capital and pays cumulative dividends at a rate of 9% per annum. The Series B preferred stock may not be redeemed until all the Series A preferred stock has been redeemed.

The Series A preferred stock and Series B preferred stock were issued in a transaction exempt from registration pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. Neither the Series A preferred stock nor the Series B preferred stock will be subject to any contractual restrictions on transfer.

Note 9: Regulatory Capital Requirements

At December 31, 2009, the Bank met each of the three minimum regulatory capital requirements. The following table summarizes the Bank’s regulatory capital position at December 31, 2009.

	Actual				For Capital Adequacy Purposes				Well Capitalized Under Prompt Corrective Action Provision
($ in thousands)	Amount		%		Amount		%		Amount		%
Total Capital (to Risk Weighted Assets)	$	24,131	11.97	%	$	16,196	8.00	%	$	20,245	10.00	%
Tier 1 Capital (to Risk Weighted Assets)	$	21,600	10.71	%	$	8,098	4.00	%	$	12,147	6.00	%
Tier 1 Capital (to Average Assets)	$	21,600	8.29	%	$	10,425	4.00	%	$	13,031	5.00	%

10

The following table summarizes the Bank’s regulatory capital position at June 30, 2009.

	Actual				For Capital Adequacy Purposes				Well Capitalized Under Prompt Corrective Action Provision
($ in thousands)	Amount		%		Amount		%		Amount		%
Total Capital (to Risk Weighted Assets)	$	23,933	11.58	%	$	16,536	8.00	%	$	20,670	10.00	%
Tier 1 Capital (to Risk Weighted Assets)	$	21,359	10.33	%	$	8,268	4.00	%	$	12,402	6.00	%
Tier 1 Capital (to Average Assets)	$	21,359	7.98	%	$	10,701	4.00	%	$	13,377	5.00	%

Note 10: Loss Per Share

The following table presents a summary of per share data and amounts for the periods indicated.

	Six Months Ended December 31,						Three Months Ended December 31,
(in thousands except for per share data)	2009			2008			2009			2008
Net loss available for common shareholders	$	(58	)	$	(307	)	$	(33	)	$	(496	)
Basic weighted average shares outstanding		1,933			1,919			1,931			1,919
Basic loss per share	$	(0.03	)	$	(0.16	)	$	(0.02	)	$	(0.26	)
Dilutive shares		—			—			—			—
Diluted weighted average shares outstanding		1,933			1,919			1,931			1,919
Diluted loss per share	$	(0.03	)	$	(0.16	)	$	(0.02	)	$	(0.26	)

At December 31, 2009, there were 20,832 stock options outstanding all of which had exercise prices above the market price of the Company’s common stock on the same date.

Note 11: Guarantees

The Company does not issue any guarantees that would require liability recognition or disclosure, other than its standby letters of credit. Standby letters of credit are conditional written commitments issued by the Company to guarantee the performance of a customer to a third party. Generally, all letters of credit when issued have expiration dates within one year. The credit risk involved in issuing letters of credit is essentially the same as those that are involved in extending loan facilities to customers. The Company, generally, holds collateral and/or personal guarantees supporting these commitments. The Company had $1,759,000 of standby letters of credit as of December 31, 2009 and $1,392,000 outstanding as of June 30, 2009. Management believes that the proceeds obtained through a liquidation of collateral and the enforcement of guarantees would be sufficient to cover the potential amount of future payment required under the corresponding guarantees. The amount of the liability as of December 31, 2009 and June 30, 2009 for guarantees under standby letters of credit issued is not material.

Note 12: Goodwill and Intangible Assets

ASC Topic 350, “Intangibles – Goodwill and Other” requires that goodwill no longer be amortized, but rather that it be tested for impairment on an annual basis at the reporting unit level, which is either at the same level or one level below an operating segment. Other acquired intangible assets with finite lives, such as purchased customer accounts, are required to be amortized over their estimated lives. Other intangible assets are amortized using the straight-line method over estimated useful lives of 10 years. The Company periodically assesses whether events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amounts of goodwill and other intangible assets may be impaired.

11

Note 13: Share-Based Compensation

Stock Options

The Company’s 1996 Stock Options and Incentive Plan (Plan) was approved by the stockholders at the 1996 annual meeting. The Plan provides for the granting of options to acquire common stock to directors and key employees. Option prices are equal or greater than the estimated fair market value of the common stock at the date of the grant. In October 1996, the Company granted options to purchase 137,862 shares at $4.60 per share. There are no remaining options to be issued under this plan.

The Company’s 2000 Stock Option and Incentive Plan was approved by the stockholders at the 2000 annual meeting. The Plan provides for the granting of options to acquire common stock to directors and key employees. Option prices are equal or greater than the estimated fair market value of the common stock at the date of the grant. The Plan provides for one-fifth of the options granted to be exercisable on each of the first five anniversaries of the date of grant. Under this plan, in August 2001 the Company granted options to purchase 99,975 shares at $6.29 per share. There are 8,971 options eligible to be issued under this plan.

A summary of share option activity for the six month period ended December 31, 2009 follows:

	Shares	Weighted Average Exercise Price		Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Term in Years	Aggregate Intrinsic Value (000s)
Outstanding at June 30, 2009	20,832	$	6.29	2.1	$	—
Granted	—		—	—
Exercised	—		—	—
Forfeited or expired	—		—	—
Outstanding at December 31, 2009	20,832	$	6.29	1.6	$	—
Exercisable at December 31, 2009	20,832	$	6.29

Stock Incentive Plan

In October 2004, the shareholders of the Company approved the 2004 Stock Incentive Plan. Under this plan, 90,000 shares of common stock are available for issuance under a variety of awards. An additional 40,146 shares were made available for issuance to settle past deferred compensation obligations. This new plan replaced the Director’s retirement plan that became effective in September 1995. At the time of adoption, the directors had the option to reallocate their deferred compensation assets.

As of December 31, 2009, there are 57,255 deferred shares under this plan of which 12,906 are issued and outstanding. These deferred shares are allocated in lieu of cash compensation to Directors of the Company. These shares are included in shares outstanding for the purposes of computing earnings per share. Additionally, as of December 31, 2009 there are 3,250 non-vested shares outstanding under this plan.

A summary of the status of the Company’s non-vested shares as of December 31, 2009 is presented below:

	Common Shares	Weighted Average Grant-Date Fair Value
Non-vested as of June 30, 2009	13,484	$	12.12
Awards Granted	—		—
Vested	10,234		13.71
Forfeited	—		—
Non-vested at December 31, 2009	3,250	$	7.10

12

As of December 31, 2009 there was $12,000 of total unrecognized compensation costs related to non-vested share-based compensation. The cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 18 months. At grant date, vesting of the shares was “cliff” vesting at the end of either a two or three year period. Compensation expense totaling $6,000 and $20,000 has been recognized in the three and six month periods ended December 31, 2009 as a result of these awards.

Note 14: Termination of Merger Agreement

On January 3, 2008, Patapsco Bancorp, Inc. and Bradford Bancorp, Inc. announced that they mutually terminated the Agreement and Plan of Merger that the parties previously executed on March 19, 2007. Pursuant to the termination agreement, Bradford Mid-Tier Company agreed to pay the Company a termination fee of $2.0 million payable in the form of a promissory note. This $2.0 million was recognized as income in the quarter ended March 31, 2008. The promissory note matured on December 31, 2008, at which point Bradford Mid-Tier Company renewed the note. The renewed promissory note matures on December 31, 2011 and provides for interest equal to the prime rate but no less than 3.25%. Bradford Mid-Tier Company prepaid the first year’s interest payments. In the event Bradford Mid-Tier Company elects to defer interest payments in 2010 or 2011, the interest rate will be increased to the prime rate plus 0.70%. Repayment of this debt is guaranteed by the FDIC under the FDIC’s Temporary Liquidity Guarantee Program.

On August 28, 2009, Bradford Bank, a wholly owned subsidiary of Bradford Mid-Tier Company, was closed by the Office of Thrift Supervision (“OTS”) and the FDIC was appointed receiver. As a result of Bradford Bank being placed into receivership, the OTS was appointed statutory trustee of Bradford Mid-Tier Company and a bankruptcy trustee was appointed. The bankruptcy trustee demanded that the Company remit the balance of the prepaid interest payment noted above. This created a default of the note. The Company pursued collection from the FDIC. The FDIC has made two quarterly interest payments that were due on October 1, 2009 and January 4, 2010. At this time, the Company does not expect to receive the payment of principal until the note matures on December 31, 2011.

Note 15: Fair Value Measurements

Effective July 1, 2008, the Company adopted ASC Topic 820, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures.” These standards defined the concept of fair value, established a framework for measuring fair value in accordance with GAAP, and expand disclosure about fair value measurements. ASC Topic 820 applies only to fair value measurements required or permitted under current accounting pronouncements, but does not require any new fair value measurements. Fair value is defined as the price to sell an asset or to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between willing market participants as of the measurement date. The statement also expands disclosures about financial instruments that are measured at fair value and eliminates the use of large position discounts for financial instruments quoted in active markets. The disclosure’s emphasis is on the inputs used to measure fair value and the effect of the measurement on earnings for the period. The adoption did not have any effect on the Company’s consolidated financial position or results of operations. Fair value estimates, methods, and assumptions are set forth below for the Company’s financial instruments as of December 31, 2009 and June 30, 2009.

As permitted by GAAP, the Company began applying provisions of ASC Topic 820 to certain nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities for its fiscal year beginning July 1, 2009.

Fair value estimates are made at a specific point in time, based on relevant market information and information about financial instruments. These estimates do not reflect any premium or discount that could result from offering for sale at one time the Company’s entire holdings of a particular financial instrument. Because no market exists for a significant portion of the Company’s financial instruments, fair value estimates are based on judgments regarding future expected loss experience, current economic conditions, risk characteristics of various financial instruments and other factors. These estimates are subjective in nature and involve uncertainties and matters of significant judgment and therefore cannot be determined with precision. Changes in assumptions could significantly affect estimates.

13

The carrying amount and estimated fair value of financial instruments is summarized as follows at:

	December 31, 2009				June 30, 2009
(In thousands)	Carrying amount		Fair value		Carrying amount		Fair value
Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	11,882	$	11,882	$	19,794	$	19,794
Securities, available for sale		17,092		17,092		16,084		16,084
Loans receivable, net		212,444		215,424		216,927		223,991
Investment in securities required by law		2,847		2,847		2,817		2,817
Accrued interest receivable		1,365		1,365		1,596		1,596
Liabilities:
Deposits		212,828		213,633		207,795		208,571
Long-term debt		27,100		28,638		39,300		40,539
Accrued interest payable		327		327		436		436
Off balance sheet instruments:
Commitments to extend credit		—		—		—		—

Cash and Cash Equivalents – Due from Banks, Interest Bearings Deposits with Banks and Federal Funds Sold

The statement of financial condition carrying amounts for cash and due from banks, interest bearing deposits with banks and federal funds sold approximate the estimated fair values of such assets.

Securities Available for Sale

The fair value of securities available for sale (carried at fair value) are determined by obtaining quoted market prices on nationally recognized securities exchanges (level 1), or matrix pricing (Level 2), which is a mathematical technique used widely in the industry to value debt securities without relying exclusively on quoted market prices for the specific securities but rather by relying on the securities’ relationship to other benchmark quoted prices.

Loans Receivable

Loans receivable were segmented into portfolios with similar financial characteristics. Loans were also segmented by type such as residential and nonresidential, construction and land, second mortgage loans, commercial, and consumer. Each loan category was further segmented by fixed and adjustable rate interest terms. The fair value of loans was calculated by discounting anticipated cash flows based on weighted average contractual maturity, weighted average coupon and market rates.

Impaired Loans

The Company considers loans to be impaired when it becomes probable that the Company will be unable to collect all amounts due in accordance with the contractual terms of the loan agreement. All non-accrual loans are considered impaired. The measurement of impaired loans is based on the present value of the expected cash flows discounted at the historical effective interest rate, the market price of the loan, or the fair value of the underlying collateral. These assets are included as Level 3 fair values, based upon the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurements. The fair value consists of the loan balances of $5.1 million less their specific valuation allowances of $999,000 as determined in accordance with ASC 310-10-35 (formerly SFAS 114, “Accounting by Creditors for Impairment of a Loan”). The increase in the allowance to $999,000 at December 31, 2009 resulted in impairment charges of $505,000 and $617,000 for the three and six month periods ended December 31, 2009, respectively, which was included in earnings for the three months and six ended December 31, 2009.

Securities required by Law

The carrying amount of securities required by law approximates its fair value.

Accrued Interest Receivable

The carrying amount of accrued interest receivable approximates its fair value.

Deposits

The fair value of deposits with no stated maturity, such as non-interest bearing deposits, interest bearing NOW accounts and statement savings accounts, is equal to the carrying amounts. The fair value of certificates of deposit was based on the discounted value of contractual cash flows. The discount rate for certificates of deposit was estimated using market rates.

14

Long-Term Debt

The fair value of long-term debt was based on the discounted value of contractual cash flows, using market rates.

Accrued Interest Payable

The carrying amount of accrued interest payable approximates its fair value.

Off-Balance Sheet Financial Instruments

The Company is a party to financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk in the normal course of business, including mortgage loan commitments, undisbursed lines of credit on commercial business loans and standby letters of credit. These instruments involve, to various degrees, elements of credit and interest rate risk in excess of the amount recognized in the consolidated statements of financial condition. The fair values of such commitments are immaterial.

Fair Value Disclosures

The disclosure of fair value amounts does not include the fair values of any intangibles, including core deposit intangibles. Core deposit intangibles represent the value attributable to total deposits based on an expected duration of customer relationships.

In April 2009, the FASB issued ASC 820-10-65, “Determining Fair Value When the Volume and Level of Activity for the Asset or Liability Have Significantly Decreased and Identifying Transactions That Are Not Orderly.” ASC 820-10-65 defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell the asset or transfer the liability in an orderly transaction (that is, not a forced liquidation or distressed sale) between market participants at the measurement date under current market conditions. ASC 820-10-65 provides additional guidance in determining when the volume and level of activity for the asset or liability has significantly decreased. ASC 820-10-65 also includes guidance on identifying circumstances when a transaction may not be considered orderly.

ASC 820-10-65 provides a list of factors that a reporting entity should evaluate to determine whether there has been a significant decrease in the volume and level of activity for the asset or liability in relation to normal market activity for the asset or liability. When the reporting entity concludes there has been a significant decrease in the volume and level of activity for the asset or liability, further analysis of the information from that market is needed and significant adjustments to the related prices may be necessary to estimate fair value in accordance with GAAP.

This ASC 820-10-65 clarifies that when there has been a significant decrease in the volume and level of activity for the asset or liability, some transactions may not be orderly. In those situations, the entity must evaluate the weight of the evidence to determine whether the transaction is orderly. ASC 820-10-65 provides a list of circumstances that may indicate that a transaction is not orderly. A transaction price that is not associated with an orderly transaction is given little, if any, weight when estimating fair value.

The Company has an established and documented process for determining fair values. Fair value is based on quoted market prices, when available. If listed prices or quotes are not available, fair value is based on fair value models that use market participant or independently sourced market data, which include discount rate, interest rate yield curves, prepayment speeds, bond ratings, credit risk, loss severities, default rates, and expected cash flow assumptions. In addition, valuation adjustments may be made in the determination of fair value. These fair value adjustments may include amounts to reflect counterparty credit quality, creditworthiness, liquidity, and other unobservable inputs that are applied consistently over time. These adjustments are estimated and therefore, subject to managements’ judgment, and at times, may be necessary to mitigate the possibility of error or revision in the estimate of the fair value provided by the model. The Company has various controls in place to ensure that the valuations are appropriate, including review and approval of the valuation models, benchmarking, comparison to similar products, and reviews of actual cash settlements. The methods described above may produce fair value calculations that may not be indicative of the net realizable value or reflective of future fair values. While the Company believes its valuation methods are consistent with other financial institutions, the use of different methods or assumptions to determine fair values could result in different estimates of fair value.

ASC Topic 820 establishes a three-level valuation hierarchy for disclosure of fair value measurements. The valuation hierarchy is based on the inputs used to value the particular asset or liability at the measurement date. The three levels are defined as follows:

• Level 1 – inputs to the valuation methodology are quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities in active markets.

• Level 2 – inputs to the valuation methodology include quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, quoted prices of identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active, and

15

inputs that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the financial instrument.

• Level 3 – inputs to the valuation methodology are unobservable and significant to the fair value measurement.

Each financial instrument’s level assignment within the valuation hierarchy is based upon the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement for that particular category.

For financial assets measured at fair value on a recurring and nonrecurring basis, the fair value measurements by level within the fair value hierarchy are as follows:

	At December 31, 2009
(In thousands)	Total		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
Measured at fair value on a recurring basis:
Securities available for sale	$	17,092	$	—	$	17,092	$	—
Measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis:
Impaired Loans	$	4,064	$	—	$	—	$	4,064
	At June 30, 2009
(In thousands)	Total		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
Measured at fair value on a recurring basis:
Securities available for sale	$	16,084	$	—	$	16,084	$	—
Measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis:
Impaired Loans	$	2,703	$	—	$	—	$	2,703

Note 16: Reclassification

Certain prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current period’s presentation.

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

General

The Company’s results of operations depend primarily on its level of net interest income, which is the difference between interest earned on interest-earning assets, consisting primarily of loans, investment securities, mortgage-backed securities and other investments, and the interest paid on interest-bearing liabilities, consisting primarily of deposits and advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank of Atlanta. The net interest income earned on interest-earning assets (“net interest margin”) and the ratio of interest-earning assets to interest-bearing liabilities have a significant impact on net interest income. The Company’s net interest margin is affected by regulatory, economic and competitive factors that influence interest rates, loan and deposit flows. The Company, like other financial institutions, is subject to interest rate risk to the degree that its interest-earning assets mature or reprice at different times, or on a different basis, than its interest-bearing liabilities. The Company’s results of operations are also significantly impacted by the amount of its non-interest income, including loan fees and service charges, and levels of non-interest expense, which consists principally of compensation and employee benefits, insurance premiums, professional fees, equipment expense, occupancy costs, advertising, data processing and other operating expenses.

The Company’s operating results are significantly affected by general economic and competitive conditions, in particular, changes in market interest rates, government policies and actions taken by regulatory authorities. Lending activities are influenced by general economic conditions, competition among lenders, the level of interest rates and the availability of funds. Deposit flows and costs of funds are influenced by prevailing market rates of interest, primarily on competing investments, account maturities and the level of personal income and savings in the Company’s market area.

Forward-Looking Statements

When used in this Form 10-Q, the words or phrases “will likely result,” “are expected to,” “will continue,” “is anticipated,” “estimate,” “project” or similar expressions are intended to identify “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such statements are subject to certain risks and uncertainties including changes in economic conditions in the Company’s market area, changes in policies by regulatory agencies, fluctuations in interest rates, demand for loans in the Company’s market area, competition

16

and the Risk Factors described in Item 1A of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2010, that could cause actual results to differ materially from historical earnings and those presently anticipated or projected. The Company wishes to caution readers not to place undue reliance on any such forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date made. The Company wishes to advise readers that the factors listed above could affect the Company’s financial performance and could cause the Company’s actual results for future periods to differ materially from any opinions or statements expressed with respect to future periods in any current statements.

The Company does not undertake, and specifically disclaims any obligation, to publicly release the result of any revisions which may be made to any forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date of such statements or to reflect the occurrence of anticipated or unanticipated events.

Critical Accounting Policies

The Company’s consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) and follow general practices within the industry in which it operates. Application of these principles requires management to make estimates, assumptions, and judgments that affect the amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. These estimates, assumptions, and judgments are based on information available as of the date of the consolidated financial statements; accordingly, as this information changes, the financial statements could reflect different estimates, assumptions and judgments. Certain policies inherently have a greater reliance on the use of estimates, assumptions, and judgments and as such have a greater possibility of producing results that could be materially different than originally reported. These estimates, assumptions and judgments are necessary when financial instruments are required to be recorded at fair value or when the decline in the value of an asset carried on the statement of financial condition at historic cost requires an impairment write-down or a valuation reserve to be established.

The allowance for loan losses (“allowance”) represents an amount, that in the judgment of management, will be adequate to absorb probable losses on outstanding loans and leases that may become uncollectible. The allowance represents an estimate made based upon two principles of accounting: (1) ASC Topic 855, “Accounting for Contingencies”, that requires losses to be accrued when their occurrence is probable and estimable, and (2) ASC 310-10-35, “Accounting by Creditors for Impairment of a Loan”, that requires losses be accrued when it is probable that the lender will not collect all principal and interest due under the original terms of the loan. The adequacy of the allowance is determined through careful evaluation of the loan portfolio. This determination is inherently subjective and requires significant estimates, including estimated losses on pools of homogeneous loans based on historical loss experience and consideration of the current economic environment that may be subject to change. Loans and leases deemed uncollectible are charged against the allowance and recoveries of previously charged-off amounts are credited to it. The level of the allowance is adjusted through the provision for loan losses that is recorded as a current period expense.

The methodology for assessing the appropriateness of the allowance includes a specific allowance, a formula allowance and a nonspecific allowance. The specific allowance is for risk rated credits on an individual basis. The formula allowance reflects historical losses by credit category. The nonspecific allowance captures losses whose impact on the portfolio have occurred but have yet to be recognized in either the specific allowance or the formula allowance. The factors used in determining the nonspecific allowance include trends in delinquencies, trends in volumes and terms of loans, the size of loans relative to the allowance, concentration of credits, the quality of the risk identification system and credit administration and local and national economic trends.

In accordance with the provisions of ASC 310-10-35, the Company determines and recognizes impairment of certain loans. A loan is determined to be impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable that the Company will be unable to collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. A loan is not considered impaired during a period of delay in payment if the Company expects to collect all amounts due, including past-due interest. The Company generally considers a period of delay in payment to include delinquency up to and including 90 days. ASC Topic 310 requires that impairment in a loan be measured at the present value of its expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate, or at the loan’s observable market price or the fair value of the collateral if the loan is collateral dependent.

ASC Topic 310 is generally applicable for all loans except large groups of smaller-balance homogeneous loans that are evaluated collectively for impairment, including residential first and second mortgage loans and consumer installment loans. Impaired loans are therefore generally comprised of commercial mortgage, real estate development, and certain restructured residential loans. In addition, impaired loans are generally loans which management has placed in non-accrual status since loans are placed in non-accrual status on the earlier of the date

17

that management determines that the collection of principal and/or interest is in doubt or the date that principal or interest is 90 days or more past-due.

Management believes that the allowance is adequate. However, its determination requires significant judgment, and estimates of the probable losses in the loan and lease portfolio can vary significantly from amounts that actually occur.

Real estate acquired through foreclosure and other repossessed assets are initially recorded at the estimated fair value, net of estimated selling costs, and subsequently at the lower of carrying cost or fair value less estimated costs to sell. Costs relating to holding such property are charged against income in the current period, while costs relating to improving such real estate are capitalized until a salable condition is reached.

Comparison of Financial Condition at December 31, 2009 and June 30, 2009

Patapsco Bancorp’s assets decreased by $7.3 million, or 2.7% to $261.1 million at December 31, 2009 from $268.4 million at June 30, 2009. Net loans declined $4.5 million or 2.1% to $212.4 million at December 31, 2009 from $216.9 million at June 30, 2009. Growth in commercial real estate loans of $2.6 million was more than offset by decreases in commercial leases of $3.1 million, residential mortgage loans of $1.5 million, construction loans of $1.2 million, consumer loans of $1.3 million and commercial business loans of $0.9 million. These amounts include the foreclosure of collateral on three loans totaling $3.2 million – a $2.4 million land acquisition and development loan, a $472,000 SBA 504 Loan Program restaurant loan and a $295,000 SBA 7(a) Loan Program loan for an excursion charter boat.

Securities available for sale increased $1.0 million to $17.1 million at December 31, 2009 from $16.1 million at June 30, 2009 as maturities of $5.5 million and pay-downs of the mortgage-backed securities of $0.6 million were replaced by new purchases of investment securities of $7.1 million. Other assets grew $1.1 million due to the prepayment of twelve quarters of FDIC deposit insurance premiums as of December 31, 2009.

Total deposits grew $5.0 million, or 2.4%, to $212.8 million at December 31, 2009 from $207.8 million at June 30, 2009. Interest-bearing deposits increased $5.7 million, or 2.9%, to $202.2 million at December 31, 2009 from $196.5 million at June 30, 2009. Noninterest-bearing deposits decreased $0.6 million, or 5.5%, to $10.7 million at December 31, 2009 from $11.3 million at June 30, 2009. Long-term debt decreased $12.2 million to $22.1 million at December 31, 2009 from $34.3 million at June 30, 2009. This reduction was funded primarily by the reduction in short-term investments and secondarily by the growth in deposits.

Stockholders’ equity increased by $75,000 from $19.7 million at June 30, 2009 to $19.8 million at December 31, 2009 and resulted primarily from an improvement in the market value of available for sales securities, net of income taxes.

Comparison of Operating Results for the Quarter and Six Months Ended December 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008

Net Income. Patapsco Bancorp recorded a net loss available to common shareholders of $33,000, or $0.02 per share, for the quarter ended December 31, 2009 compared to a net loss of $496,000 or $0.26 per share for the quarter ended December 31, 2008. The improved net loss available to common shareholders in the current quarter resulted from the loan loss provision being $912,000 lower than same quarter in 2008. The previous year’s provision reflected the rapid deterioration in economic conditions and the related impact on the Company’s loan portfolio. In addition, net interest income was $122,000 lower due to a reduction in loan demand which has resulted in a shift in earning assets from loans to lower yielding investments. The Company declared and paid $82,000 in dividends on preferred and warrant preferred stock during the current quarter versus $13,000 in the previous year’s quarter due to the timing of preferred stock issuance. For the six months ended December 31, 2009, the Company recorded a net loss applicable to common shareholders of $58,000 compared to a loss of $307,000 for the same period in 2008 as the loan loss provision decreased $768,000 to $792,000 in the current period from $1.6 million in the same period of the prior year. The Company declared and paid $163,000 in dividends on preferred and warrant preferred stock during the six months ended December 31, 2009 versus $13,000 in the same period of the previous year.

Net Interest Income. Patapsco Bancorp’s net interest income decreased by $122,000, or 5.3%, to $2.2 million for the quarter ended December 31, 2009 compared to $2.3 million for the same quarter in 2008. The decrease in net interest income during the comparable three-month periods was due to a 15 basis point decrease in the net interest margin to 3.49% in the quarter ended December 31, 2009 from 3.64% in the quarter ended December 31, 2008. The decline in the net interest margin was driven by an 88 basis point decline in the average rate earned on interest

18

earning assets which more than offset the 80 basis point decrease in the average rate paid on interest bearing liabilities. In addition, the volume of interest earning assets declined $3.7 million to $247.9 million for the quarter ended December 31, 2009 versus $251.6 million for the quarter ended December 31, 2008.

For the six months ended December 31, 2009 net interest income declined $240,000 as the net interest margin decreased 23 basis points which more than offset the $2.1 million increase in growth in interest earning assets. The decline in the net interest margin was due to the aforementioned decline in asset yields which exceeded the drop in funding costs.

Interest Income. Total interest income decreased by $613,000, or 15%, to $3.5 million for the quarter ended December 31, 2009 from $4.1 million for the quarter ended December 31, 2008. Total interest income for the six months ended December 31, 2009 decreased $1.0 million to $7.3 million from $8.3 million in the comparable period of the prior year. The decreases in interest income during the comparable three and six month periods were due to lower rates of interest earned, which more than offset the higher level of earning assets. The impact of lower market interest rates in the current three and six month periods had a negative effect on the yields on earning assets. In addition, a shift in the mix of earning assets from loans to lower yielding investments and a decrease in the yield on loans negatively affected the yield on average earning assets.

Interest income on loans receivable decreased by $637,000, or 16%, to $3.4 million for the quarter ended December 31, 2009 from $4.0 million for the quarter ended December 31, 2008. For the six months ended December 31, 2009, interest income on loans declined $1.1 million to $6.9 million from $8.0 million in the same period of the previous year. The decreases in interest income on loans for both the three and six months periods were due to lower yields as well as lower average loan balances. The lower yields were due to the decline in market interest rates mentioned above. In addition, the increase in the level of non-accrual loans also contributed to the declines in yields. The lower loan volumes were due to a considerable drop in loan demand over the previous year.

Interest income on investment securities, including investments required by law, increased $31,000, or 23%, to $163,000 and by $53,000, or 19%, to $325,000 in the three and six month periods ended December 31, 2009, respectively as the increase in volumes for the respective periods more than offset the declines in the yield over the same periods.

Interest income on federal funds sold and other investments decreased $7,000, or 60%, to $5,000, and by $12,000, or 56%, to $15,000 in the three and six month periods ended December 31, 2009, respectively as the decline in yields more than offset the impact of the growth in average balances.

Interest Expense. Total interest expense decreased by $491,000, or 27%, to $1.3 million for the quarter ended December 31, 2009 from $1.8 million for the quarter ended December 31, 2008. Total interest expense decreased $790,000, or 21%, to $2.9 million for the six month period ended December 31, 2009 from $3.7 million for the six month period ended December 31, 2008. The decline in interest expense during the comparable three and six month periods was due to lower rates paid on interest-bearing liabilities which more than offset the higher level of balances.

Interest expense on deposits decreased by $339,000, or 25%, to $1.0 million in the current quarter from $1.4 million in the previous year’s quarter. For the six months ended December 31, 2009 interest expense on deposits decreased $492,000, or 18%, to $2.2 million. The decrease in interest expense on deposits in both the quarterly and year to date periods was due to a decline in rates paid on deposits which had a larger impact than the growth in average deposit balances. The lower rates paid on deposits reflect the lower rate environment in the current periods as well as a moderation of the competition pressures that existed in the previous year.

Interest expense on short-term borrowings decreased $26,000, or 100%, for the current quarter from $26,000 for the three months ended December 31, 2008 due to the complete run-off of these borrowings. For the six months ended December 31, 2009, interest expense on short-term borrowings decreased $60,000, or 91%, to $6,000 due to lower volumes as well as a decline in rates.

Interest expense on long-term borrowings decreased $126,000, or 29%, to $304,000 for the quarter ended December 31, 2009. For the six months ended December 31, 2009, interest expense on long-term borrowings decreased $238,000, or 27%, to $634,000. The decreases in interest expense in the comparable three and six month periods were due to lower average balances outstanding which more than offset the slightly higher rates of interest paid. The average rates paid were higher as lower rate borrowings matured and were not replaced.

19

Average Balance, Interest and Average Yields and Rates

The following table sets forth certain information relating to the Company’s average interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities and reflects the average yield on assets and cost of liabilities for the periods and at the dates indicated. Dividing income or expense by the average daily balance of assets or liabilities, respectively, derives such yields and costs for the periods presented. Average balances are derived from daily balances.

The table also presents information for the periods indicated with respect to the Company’s net interest margin, which is net interest income divided by the average balance of interest earning assets. This in an important indicator of commercial bank profitability. The net interest margin is affected by yields on interest-earning assets, the costs of interest-bearing liabilities and the relative amounts of interest earning assets and interest bearing liabilities. Another indicator of the Company’s net interest income is the interest rate spread, or the difference between the average yield on interest earning assets and the average rate paid on interest bearing liabilities.

20

	Six Months Ended December 31,
	2009						2008
	Average Balance		Interest		Average Rate(1)		Average Balance		Interest		Average Rate(1)
	(Dollars in thousands)
Interest-earning assets:
Loans receivable, including fees (2)	$	219,438	$	6,913	6.23	%	$	232,781	$	7,984	6.78	%
Securities, including securities required by law		18,911		325	3.43	%		11,692		272	4.65	%
Federal funds sold and other investments		12,148		15	0.24	%		3,891		27	1.38	%
Total interest earning assets		250,497		7,253	5.73	%		248,364		8,283	6.59	%
Non-interest-earning assets		14,783						15,980
Total assets	$	265,280					$	264,344
Interest-bearing liabilities:
Interest bearing deposits	$	201,207		2,247	2.21	%	$	185,042		2,739	2.94	%
Short-term borrowings		2,935		6	0.43	%		4,908		66	2.62	%
Long-term borrowings		28,872		634	4.30	%		40,778		872	4.19	%
Total interest-bearing liabilities		233,014		2,887	2.45	%		230,728		3,677	3.16	%
Non-interest-bearing liabilities		12,423						13,772
Total liabilities		245,437						244,500
Stockholders’ equity		19,843						19,844
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	265,280					$	264,344
Net interest income			$	4,366					$	4,606
Interest rate spread					3.28	%					3.43	%
Net Interest margin					3.46	%					3.69	%
Ratio of average interest-earning assets to average interest-bearing liabilities					107.50	%					107.64	%

(1) Yields and rates are annualized.

(2) Includes nonaccrual loans.

21

	Three Months Ended December 31,
	2009						2008
	Average Balance		Interest		Average Rate(1)		Average Balance		Interest		Average Rate(1)
	(Dollars in thousands)
Interest-earning assets:
Loans receivable, including fees (2)	$	219,181	$	3,357	6.06	%	$	234,638	$	3,994	6.73	%
Securities, including securities required by law		19,838		163	3.28	%		11,718		132	4.50	%
Federal funds sold and other investments		8,880		5	0.22	%		5,240		12	0.92	%
Total interest earning assets		247,899		3,525	5.62	%		251,596		4,138	6.50	%
Non-interest-earning assets		15,297						16,020
Total assets	$	263,196					$	267,616
Interest-bearing liabilities:
Interest bearing deposits	$	203,192		1,039	2.03	%	$	188,026		1,378	2.92	%
Short-term borrowings		—		—	—			3,883		26	2.62	%
Long-term borrowings		27,100		304	4.39	%		42,006		430	4.10	%
Total interest-bearing liabilities		230,292		1,343	2.31	%		233,915		1,834	3.11	%
Non-interest-bearing liabilities		13,023						13,419
Total liabilities		243,315						247,334
Stockholders’ equity		19,881						20,282
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	263,196					$	267,616
Net Interest Income			$	2,182					$	2,304
Interest rate spread					3.31	%					3.39	%
Net interest margin					3.49	%					3.64	%
Ratio of average interest-earning assets to average interest-bearing liabilities					107.65	%					107.56	%

(1) Yields and rates are annualized.

(2) Includes nonaccrual loans.

22

Provision for Loan Losses. Provisions for loan losses are charged to earnings to maintain the total allowance for loan losses at a level considered adequate by management to provide for loan losses. The components of the allowance for loan losses represent an estimation done pursuant to either ASC Topic 855 and ASC 310-10-35. The adequacy of the allowance for loan losses is determined through a continuous review of the loan and lease portfolio and considers factors such as prior loss experience, type of collateral, industry standards, amount and type of past due loans in Patapsco Bancorp’s loan portfolio, current economic conditions, both national and local, and other factors unique to particular loans and leases in the portfolio. Patapsco Bancorp’s management periodically monitors and adjusts its allowance for loan losses based upon its analysis of the loan portfolio.

The following table shows the activity in the allowance for loan losses.

	Six Months Ended December 31						Three Months Ended December 31
($ in thousands)	2009			2008			2009			2008
Allowance for loan losses, beginning of period	$	3,023		$	1,834		$	3,220		$	1,836
Provision for loan losses		792			1,560			398			1,310
Loans Charged Off:
Consumer		302			283			156			95
Real Estate		3			1			—			1
Commercial Loan		110			—			110			—
Commercial Lease		158			280			55			201
Total Charge-Offs		573			564			321			297
Recoveries:
Consumer		43			38			12			24
Real Estate		—			—			—			—
Commercial Loan		19			2			18			1
Commercial Lease		29			30			6			26
Total Recoveries		91			70			36			51
Allowance for loan losses, end of period	$	3,333		$	2,900		$	3,333		$	2,900
Ratio of net charge-offs (annualized) to average loans outstanding during the period		0.44	%		0.42	%		0.52	%		0.42	%
Ratio of allowance to nonperforming loans		32.10	%		67.66	%

The provision for loan losses was $398,000 in the quarter ended December 31, 2009, compared to $1.3 million for the quarter ended December 31, 2008. The decrease in the provision is primarily due to the previous year’s provision reflecting an increase in the historical loan loss rates, one of the components used in computing the allowance for loan losses. Patapsco Bancorp’s allowance for loan losses as a percentage of total loans outstanding was 1.54% of total loans as of December 31, 2009 versus 1.37% at June 30, 2009. Patapsco Bancorp’s allowance for loan losses as a percentage of nonperforming loans was 32.1% at December 31, 2009 as compared to 26.89% at June 30, 2009. Setting the allowance at this level takes into consideration that 93% of non-performing loans are collateralized by real estate or guaranteed by the SBA at December 31, 2009. In consideration of the appropriate level for the allowance for loan losses, downward adjustments were made to values established by real estate appraisals, where warranted, taking into consideration the age of the appraisal and the nature of the collateral. These adjusted appraisal values, which required management’s judgment, were used to develop estimated losses and related specific loss reserves within the allowance for loan losses. The decline in the ratio of allowance to nonperforming loans from 67.66% at December 31, 2008 to 32.10% at December 31, 2009 reflects the aforementioned increase in historical loan loss rates in the previous year’s period as well as the rapidly declining economy. Patapsco Bancorp has concluded, after a thorough analysis of the nonperforming loan portfolio, watch list loans, delinquencies and other factors, that the allowance is adequate at December 31, 2009.

23

The following table sets forth information with respect to the Company’s non-performing assets at the dates indicated.

($ in thousands)	December 31, 2009			June 30, 2009
Loans accounted for on a non-accrual basis (1)
Real Estate:
Residential	$	651		$	134
Commercial		1,264			2,302
Construction		2,148			3,232
Consumer		55			146
Commercial Loan/Lease		5,555			5,427
Total		9,673			11,241
Accruing loans that are contractually past due 90 days or more		709			—
Total non-performing loans		10,382			11,241
Other non-performing assets (2)		4,377			1,265
Total non-performing assets	$	14,759		$	12,506
Nonperforming loans to total loans		4.81	%		5.11	%
Troubled debt restructurings (3)	$	6,847		$	4,112

(1) Nonaccrual status denotes loans on which, in the opinion of management, the collection of additional interest is unlikely. Payments received on a nonaccrual loan are either applied to the outstanding principal balance or recorded as interest income, depending on management’s assessment of the collectability of the loan.

(2) Other nonperforming assets represent property acquired by Patapsco Bancorp through foreclosure or repossession.

(3) Certain troubled debt restructurings are accounted on a non-accrual basis and included in total non-performing loans above.

At December 31, 2009, nonaccrual construction loans totaled $2.1 million and consisted of a $1.3 million condominium conversion project and $845,000 in residential construction and development loans. Nonaccrual commercial real estate consists of an $865,000 loan collateralized by a hotel property and $398,000 in residential investor property loans. The $1.1 million decline in non-accrual commercial real estate loans reflects the transfer of a $2.3 million loan collateralized by commercial and residential lots to real estate acquired through foreclosure. All commercial real estate and construction loans are considered well securitized. Commercial loans/leases include a $3.3 million loan supporting a borrower’s various business interests including commercial properties. In addition, this category includes five loans amounting to $1.1 million to borrowers operating retail businesses. Of the $5.6 million in commercial non-accrual loans/leases, $1.1 million have an SBA guarantee.

The Company accepted a $2.0 million note receivable from Bradford Mid-Tier Company as payment for a merger termination fee. On August 28, 2009, Bradford Bank, a wholly owned subsidiary of Bradford Mid-Tier Company, was closed by the Office of Thrift Supervision (“OTS”) and the FDIC was appointed receiver. As a result of Bradford Bank being placed into receivership, the OTS was appointed statutory trustee of Bradford Mid-Tier Company. Repayment of this debt is guaranteed by the FDIC under the FDIC’s Temporary Liquidity Guarantee Program. See Note 14, “Termination of Merger Agreement,” to the consolidated financial statements for further discussion of this issue.

Noninterest Income. Patapsco Bancorp’s noninterest income consists of deposit fees, service charges, income from bank owned life insurance (“BOLI”) and gains. Total noninterest income decreased by $7,000, or 3.5%, to $191,000 for the quarter ended December 31, 2009 from $198,000 for the quarter ended December 31, 2008 due to lower deposit service fees. For the six months ended December 31, 2009, noninterest income decreased $21,000 or 4.9% due to lower deposit service fees and a nonrecurring gain on sale of repossessed property in the prior year’s comparable quarter.

Noninterest Expenses. Total noninterest expenses decreased by $94,000, or 4.7%, to $1.9 million for the quarter ended December 31, 2009 from $1.99 million for the quarter ended December 31, 2008. Compensation costs decreased $169,000 or 13.9% as staff incentives and commissions were lower. Also, the previous year’s quarter included $68,000 in severance costs associated with the decision to cease origination of commercial leases. In

24

addition, data processing costs were $39,000 lower in the quarter ended December 31, 2009 due to the conversion of the Company’s primary operating systems in the previous year’s quarter. These declines in costs were partially offset by significantly higher FDIC deposit insurance premiums due to higher premium rates prevalent in the banking industry in the current year in conjunction with the expiration of credits which benefit the prior year. In addition, professional fees were higher due to higher loan collection costs as well as increased compliance costs associated with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. For the six months ended December 31, 2009, noninterest expenses decreased $151,000 or 3.8% to $3.8 million from $4.0 million in same period of the prior year. Similar trends as in the current quarter were prevalent in the six month period.

Income Taxes. Income tax expense was $26,000 (or 34.7% of pre-tax income) versus a tax benefit of $319,000 (or 39.8% of pre-tax income) for the three month periods ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. For the six months ended December 31, 2009 the Company recorded tax expense of $56,000 (or 34.8% of pre-tax income) versus a benefit of $203,000 (or 40.8% of pre-tax income) in the same period last year. The change in the effective tax rate is a result of the impact of bank owned life insurance income on a lower level of pre-tax income.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

An important component of the Company’s asset/liability structure is the level of liquidity available to meet the needs of customers and creditors. The Company’s Asset/Liability Management Committee has established general guidelines for the maintenance of prudent levels of liquidity. The Committee continually monitors the amount and source of available liquidity, the time to acquire it and its cost. Management of the Company seeks to maintain a relatively high level of liquidity in order to retain flexibility in terms of investment opportunities and deposit pricing. Because liquid assets generally provide lower rates of return, the Company’s relatively high liquidity will, to a certain extent, result in lower rates of return on assets.

The Company’s most liquid assets are cash on hand, interest-bearing deposits and Federal funds sold, which are short-term, highly liquid investments with original maturities of less than three months that are readily convertible to known amounts of cash. The levels of these assets are dependent on the Company’s operating, financing and investing activities during any given period. At December 31, 2009, the Company’s cash on hand and interest-bearing deposits totaled $11.9 million. In addition, the Company has approximately $17.1 million of investment securities classified as available-for-sale, $4.5 million of which are pledged as collateral for the Company’s federal funds line of credit.

The Company anticipates that it will have sufficient funds available to meet its current loan commitments of $12.8 million and unused lines of credit of $10.8 million. Certificates of deposit that are scheduled to mature in less than one year at December 31, 2009 totaled $69.0 million. Historically, a high percentage of maturing deposits have remained with the Company.

The Company’s primary sources of funds are deposits and proceeds from maturing investment securities and mortgage-backed securities and principal and interest payments on loans. While maturities and scheduled amortization of mortgage-backed securities and loans are predictable sources of funds, deposit flows and mortgage prepayments are greatly influenced by general interest rates, economic conditions, competition and other factors.

The Company, as the holding company for the Bank, has an annual cash requirement of approximately $654,000 for the payment of preferred dividends, as well as, interest payments on the $5.0 million in junior subordinated debentures. The only source of funds for the holding company is dividends from the Bank. The amount of dividends that can be paid to the holding company from the Bank is limited by the earnings of the Bank. At December 31, 2009 the holding company had cash on hand and interest bearing deposits of $2.1 million.

The Bank had $58.0 million in borrowing capacity with the Federal Home Loan Bank of Atlanta, with $22.1 million in borrowings outstanding, at December 31, 2009. These borrowings are secured by the Bank’s stock in the Federal Home Loan Bank of Atlanta and other eligible assets. In addition, the Bank has a $4.0 million line of credit, none of which was outstanding at December 31, 2009, with Pacific Coast Bankers Bank.

As discussed in Note 9 - Regulatory Capital Requirements, the Bank exceeded all regulatory minimum capital requirements.

25

Contingencies and Off-Balance Sheet Items

The Company is party to financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk including commitments to extend credit under both new facilities and under existing lines of credit. Commitments to fund loans typically expire after 60 days, commercial lines of credit are subject to annual reviews and home equity lines of credit are generally for a term of 20 years. These instruments contain, to varying degrees, credit and interest rate risk in excess of the amounts recognized in the consolidated balance sheets.

Off-balance sheet financial instruments whose contract amounts represent credit and interest rate risk are summarized as follows:

	December 31, 2009		June 30, 2009
	($ in thousands)
Commitments to originate new loans	$	12,839	$	19,516
Undisbursed lines of credit		10,843		6,564
Financial standby letters of credit		1,759		1,392

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

This item is not applicable as the Company is a smaller reporting company.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

Disclosure Controls and Procedures

The Company’s management, including the Company’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer, have evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s “disclosure controls and procedures,” as such term is defined in Rule 13a-15(e) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, (the “Exchange Act”). Based upon their evaluation, the principal executive officer and principal financial officer concluded that, as of the end of the period covered by this report, the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective for the purpose of ensuring that the information required to be disclosed in the reports that the Company files or submits under the Exchange Act with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) (1) is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and (2) is accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management, including its principal executive and principal financial officers, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Changes to Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

There were no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting during the three months ended December 31, 2009 that have materially affected, or are reasonable likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

26

Part II. OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

None.

Item 1A. Risk Factors

For information regarding the Company’s risk factors, see Item 1A in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2009. There have been no material changes to the Risk Factors disclosed in Item 1A of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June  30, 2009

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

None.

Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities

None

Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

The following table sets forth matters that were voted upon at the Company’s Annual Meeting of Stockholder’s held on November 5, 2009:

	Votes For	Votes Against	Broker Non-votes	Abstain
Election of Directors:
Douglas H. Ludwig	1,300,504	183,404	—	—
Thomas P. O’Neill	1,374,590	109,318	—	—
Michael J. Dee	1,366,650	117,258	—	—
Approval of compensation of executive officers	1,196,537	292,389	—	26,691

Item 5. Other Information

None

Item 6. Exhibits

(a) Exhibits

The following exhibits are filed herewith:

Exhibit Number	Title
31.1	Rule 13a-14(a) Certification of Chief Executive Officer
31.2	Rule 13a-14(a) Certification of Chief Financial Officer
32	Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to §906 of Sarbanes Oxley Act

27

Signatures

In accordance with the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

	PATAPSCO BANCORP, INC.
Date: February 9, 2010	/s/ Michael J. Dee
	Michael J. Dee
	President and Chief Executive Officer
	/s/ William C. Wiedel, Jr.
	William C. Wiedel, Jr.
	Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

28