UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

xQUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2012

or

oTRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from              to             

Commission file number: 1-32459

HEADWATERS INCORPORATED

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware	87-0547337
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)	(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
10653 South River Front Parkway, Suite 300
South Jordan, Utah	84095
(Address of principal executive offices)	(Zip Code)

(801) 984-9400

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Not applicable

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

Large accelerated filer o	Accelerated filer x
Non-accelerated filer o	Smaller reporting company o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No x

The number of shares outstanding of the Registrant’s common stock as of July 25, 2012 was 61,117,114.

HEADWATERS INCORPORATED

TABLE OF CONTENTS

		Page No.
PART I — FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1.	FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited):
	Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets — As of September 30, 2011 and June 30, 2012	3
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations — For the three and nine months ended June 30, 2011 and 2012	4
	Condensed Consolidated Statement of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity — For the nine months ended June 30, 2012	5
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows — For the nine months ended June 30, 2011 and 2012	6
	Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements	7
ITEM 2.	MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS	31
ITEM 3.	QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK	39
ITEM 4.	CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES	40
PART II — OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1.	LEGAL PROCEEDINGS	41
ITEM 1A.	RISK FACTORS	41
ITEM 2.	UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS	41
ITEM 3.	DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES	42
ITEM 4.	MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES	42
ITEM 5.	OTHER INFORMATION	42
ITEM 6.	EXHIBITS	42
SIGNATURES		43

Forward-looking Statements

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 regarding future events and our future results that are based on current expectations, estimates, forecasts, and projections about the industries in which we operate and the beliefs and assumptions of our management. Actual results may vary materially from such expectations. In some cases, words such as “may,” “should,” “intends,” “plans,” “expects,” “anticipates,” “targets,” “goals,” “projects,” “believes,” “seeks,” “estimates,” “forecasts,” or variations of such words and similar expressions, or the negative of such terms, may help to identify such forward-looking statements. In addition, any statements that refer to projections of our future financial performance, our anticipated growth and trends in our businesses, and other characterizations of future events or circumstances, are forward-looking. For a discussion of the factors that could cause actual results to differ from expectations, please see the risk factors described in Item 1A of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2011, as updated from time to time. There can be no assurance that our results of operations will not be adversely affected by such factors. Unless legally required, we undertake no obligation to revise or update any forward-looking statements for any reason. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date of this report.

Our internet address is www.headwaters.com.  There we make available, free of charge, our annual report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and any amendments to those reports, as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file such material with, or furnish it to, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Our reports can be accessed through the investor relations section of our web site. The information found on our web site is not part of this or any report we file with or furnish to the SEC.

2

ITEM 1.  FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

HEADWATERS INCORPORATED

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(Unaudited)

	September 30,			June 30,
(in thousands, except par value)	2011			2012
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	50,810		$	28,976
Trade receivables, net	90,931			91,494
Inventories	33,247			32,331
Current and deferred income taxes	3,087			1,854
Assets held for sale	6,777			6,835
Other	6,954			10,158
Total current assets	191,806			171,648
Property, plant and equipment, net	164,709			159,465
Other assets:
Intangible assets, net	164,221			148,832
Goodwill	116,671			116,671
Assets held for sale	24,446			7,812
Other	66,384			41,390
Total other assets	371,722			314,705
Total assets	$	728,237		$	645,818
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable	$	18,979		$	17,430
Accrued personnel costs	23,030			30,944
Accrued interest	18,336			8,592
Current income taxes	0			2,539
Liabilities held for sale	7,470			7,202
Other accrued liabilities	45,387			43,552
Current portion of long-term debt	9,014			0
Total current liabilities	122,216			110,259
Long-term liabilities:
Long-term debt	518,789			503,062
Deferred income taxes	4,216			4,244
Unrecognized income tax benefits	11,693			8,722
Liabilities held for sale	5,507			8,545
Other	9,080			9,718
Total long-term liabilities	549,285			534,291
Total liabilities	671,501			644,550
Commitments and contingencies
Stockholders’ equity:
Common stock, $0.001 par value; authorized 200,000 shares; issued and outstanding: 60,947shares at September 30, 2011 and 61,118 shares at June 30, 2012	61			61
Capital in excess of par value	637,547			639,474
Retained earnings (accumulated deficit)	(580,861		)	(638,203		)
Other	(11		)	(64		)
Total stockholders’ equity	56,736			1,268
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	728,237		$	645,818

See accompanying notes.

3

HEADWATERS INCORPORATED

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(Unaudited)

	Three Months EndedJune 30,						Nine Months EndedJune 30,
(in thousands, except per-share data)	2011			2012			2011			2012
Revenue:
Light building products	$	91,635		$	97,164		$	224,021		$	244,809
Heavy construction materials	62,435			74,728			170,746			189,105
Energy technology	6,587			3,729			14,914			8,766
Total revenue	160,657			175,621			409,681			442,680
Cost of revenue:
Light building products	66,177			66,558			171,961			176,501
Heavy construction materials	47,234			54,863			133,095			143,341
Energy technology	3,258			1,842			7,731			4,473
Total cost of revenue	116,669			123,263			312,787			324,315
Gross profit	43,988			52,358			96,894			118,365
Operating expenses:
Amortization	5,673			4,936			16,826			15,739
Research and development	1,358			2,280			4,948			5,750
Selling, general and administrative	22,999			29,212			88,305			76,186
Restructuring costs	393			0			6,192			2,145
Total operating expenses	30,423			36,428			116,271			99,820
Operating income (loss)	13,565			15,930			(19,377		)	18,545
Other income (expense):
Net interest expense	(13,337		)	(15,975		)	(112,827		)	(41,958		)
Other, net	1,703			57			4,525			(4,253		)
Total other income (expense), net	(11,634		)	(15,918		)	(108,302		)	(46,211		)
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes	1,931			12			(127,679		)	(27,666		)
Income tax benefit (provision)	100			2,030			(2,920		)	(1,800		)
Income (loss) from continuing operations	2,031			2,042			(130,599		)	(29,466		)
Loss from discontinued operations, net of income taxes	(8,379		)	(15,078		)	(52,590		)	(27,876		)
Net loss	$	(6,348	)	$	(13,036	)	$	(183,189	)	$	(57,342	)
Basic and diluted earnings (loss) per share:
From continuing operations	$	0.04		$	0.03		$	(2.16	)	$	(0.48	)
From discontinued operations	(0.14		)	(0.24		)	(0.87		)	(0.46		)
	$	(0.10	)	$	(0.21	)	$	(3.03	)	$	(0.94	)

See accompanying notes.

4

HEADWATERS INCORPORATED

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (Unaudited)

For the Nine Months Ended June 30, 2012

	Common stock				Capital in excess		Retainedearnings(accumulated						Total stockholders’
(in thousands)	Shares		Amount		of par value		deficit)			Other			equity
Balances as of September 30, 2011	60,947		$	61	$	637,547	$	(580,861	)	$	(11	)	$	56,736
Issuance of common stock pursuant to employee stockpurchase plan	185		0		484								484
Restricted stock cancellations	(14	)	0										0
Stock-based compensation					1,379								1,379
Change in treasury shares held for deferred compensation planobligations, at cost					64					(64		)	0
Other										11			11
Net loss for the nine months ended June 30, 2012							(57,342		)				(57,342		)
Balances as of June 30, 2012	61,118		$	61	$	639,474	$	(638,203	)	$	(64	)	$	1,268

See accompanying notes.

5

HEADWATERS INCORPORATED

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(Unaudited)

	Nine Months EndedJune 30,
(in thousands)	2011			2012
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net loss	$	(183,189	)	$	(57,342	)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization	48,031			38,764
Asset impairments and non-cash restructuring costs	40,190			13,602
Interest expense related to amortization of debt issue costs and debt discount	17,111			12,687
Stock-based compensation	2,984			1,379
Deferred income taxes	143			82
Net loss (gain) of unconsolidated joint ventures	(4,155		)	6,069
Net gain on disposition of property, plant and equipment	(304		)	(902		)
Gain on convertible debt repayments	0			(2,350		)
Decrease (increase) in trade receivables	1,235			(1,190		)
Decrease in inventories	1,490			2,983
Decrease in accounts payable and accrued liabilities	(474		)	(5,658		)
Other changes in operating assets and liabilities, net	(10,034		)	3,850
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities	(86,972		)	11,974
Cash flows from investing activities:
Purchase of property, plant and equipment and payments for acquisitions	(19,788		)	(19,205		)
Proceeds from disposition of property, plant and equipment	420			1,336
Proceeds from sale of interests in joint ventures	0			18,522
Net decrease (increase) in long-term receivables and deposits	510			(99		)
Net change in other assets	(1,089		)	(875		)
Net cash used in investing activities	(19,947		)	(321		)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Net proceeds from issuance of long-term debt	392,750			0
Payments on long-term debt	(342,509		)	(32,931		)
Debt issue costs	0			(1,040		)
Employee stock purchases	546			484
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities	50,787			(33,487		)
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents	(56,132		)	(21,834		)
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period	90,984			50,810
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period	$	34,852		$	28,976

See accompanying notes.

6

HEADWATERS INCORPORATED

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

June 30, 2012

(Unaudited)

1.Nature of Operations and Basis of Presentation

Description of Business and Organization — Headwaters Incorporated (Headwaters) is a diversified building products company incorporated in Delaware, which provides products, technologies and services to the light and heavy building materials industries. Headwaters’ vision is to improve lives through innovative advancements in construction materials through application, design and purpose.

The light building products segment designs, manufactures, and sells manufactured architectural stone, exterior siding accessories (such as shutters, mounting blocks, and vents), concrete block and other building products. Headwaters believes that many of its branded products have a leading market position. Revenues from Headwaters’ light building products businesses are diversified geographically and also by market, including the new housing and residential repair and remodeling markets, as well as commercial construction markets.

The heavy construction materials segment is the nationwide leader in the management and marketing of coal combustion products (CCPs), including fly ash used as an admixture in concrete, and providing services to electric utilities related to the management of CCPs. Headwaters’ heavy construction materials business is comprised of a nationwide storage and distribution network and also provides CCP disposal and other services. Revenue is diversified geographically and by market.

The energy technology segment has been focused on reducing waste and increasing the value of energy-related feedstocks, primarily in the areas of low-value coal and oil. In coal, Headwaters owns and operates coal cleaning facilities that separate ash from waste coal to provide a refined coal product that is higher in Btu value and lower in impurities than the feedstock coal. As described in Note 3, Headwaters is disposing of all its coal cleaning facilities and they are reflected as assets held for sale in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. The results of Headwaters’ coal cleaning operations have been presented as discontinued operations for all periods presented. In oil, Headwaters believes that its heavy oil upgrading technology represents a substantial improvement over current refining technologies. Headwaters’ heavy oil upgrading process uses a liquid catalyst precursor to generate a highly active molecular catalyst to convert low-value residual oil from refining into higher-value distillates that can be further refined into gasoline, diesel and other products.

Basis of Presentation — Headwaters’ fiscal year ends on September 30 and unless otherwise noted, references to 2011 refer to Headwaters’ fiscal quarter and / or nine months ended June 30, 2011 and references to 2012 refer to Headwaters’ fiscal quarter and / or nine months ended June 30, 2012. Other references to years refer to Headwaters’ fiscal year rather than a calendar year.

The unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Headwaters, all of its subsidiaries and other entities in which Headwaters has a controlling interest. All significant intercompany transactions and accounts are eliminated in consolidation. Due to the seasonality of most of Headwaters’ operations and other factors, the consolidated results of operations for any particular period are not indicative of the results to be expected for a full fiscal year. For the nine months ended June 30, 2011 and 2012, approximately 12% of Headwaters’ total revenue and cost of revenue was for services. Substantially all service-related revenue for both periods was in the heavy construction materials segment.

The accompanying unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) for quarterly reports on Form 10-Q. In the opinion of management, all adjustments considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included, and consist of normal recurring adjustments. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in annual financial statements prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles have been condensed or omitted. These unaudited interim condensed financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in Headwaters’ Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2011 (Form 10-K) and in Headwaters’ Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q for the quarters ended December 31, 2011 and March 31, 2012.

7

HEADWATERS INCORPORATED

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

June 30, 2012

(Unaudited)

Recent Accounting Pronouncements — Headwaters has reviewed recently issued accounting standards which have not yet been adopted in order to determine their potential effect, if any, on the results of operations or financial position of Headwaters. Based on that review, Headwaters does not currently believe that any of those accounting pronouncements will have a significant effect on its current or future financial position, results of operations, cash flows or disclosures.

Reclassifications — Certain prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current period’s presentation, including reclassifications related to presentation of the coal cleaning operations as discontinued. The reclassifications had no effect on net income or total assets.

2.Segment Reporting

Headwaters currently operates three business segments: light building products, heavy construction materials and energy technology. These segments are managed and evaluated separately by management due to differences in their markets, operations, products and services. Revenues for the light building products segment consist of product sales to wholesale and retail distributors, contractors and other users of building products. Revenues for the heavy construction materials segment consist primarily of CCP product sales to ready-mix concrete businesses, with a smaller amount from services provided to coal-fueled electric generating utilities. Revenues for the energy technology segment have consisted primarily of coal sales; however, as described in Note 3, in September 2011 Headwaters committed to a plan to sell its coal cleaning facilities and the related coal sales revenue and results of operations have been reflected as discontinued operations in the accompanying statements of operations for all periods. Currently, continuing revenues for the energy technology segment consist primarily of catalyst sales to oil refineries. Intersegment sales are immaterial.

The following segment information has been prepared in accordance with ASC Topic 280 Segment Reporting. Segment performance is evaluated primarily on revenue and operating income, although other factors are also used, such as Adjusted EBITDA. Headwaters defines Adjusted EBITDA as net income plus net interest expense, income taxes, depreciation and amortization, stock-based compensation, foreign currency translation gain or loss, goodwill and other impairments, and other non-routine adjustments that arise from time to time, consistent with the methodology Headwaters has used historically.

Segment costs and expenses considered in deriving segment operating income (loss) include cost of revenue, amortization, research and development, and segment-specific selling, general and administrative expenses. Amounts included in the “Corporate” column represent expenses that are not allocated to any segment and include administrative departmental costs and general corporate overhead. Segment assets reflect those specifically attributable to individual segments and primarily include cash, accounts receivable, inventories, property, plant and equipment, intangible assets and goodwill. Certain other assets are included in the “Corporate” column. The operating results of the discontinued coal cleaning business are not included in the tables below for any period; however, coal cleaning facility expenditures comprise most of the reported energy technology segment capital expenditures, and assets as of June 30, 2012 include the coal cleaning assets held for sale.

8

HEADWATERS INCORPORATED

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

June 30, 2012

(Unaudited)

	Three Months Ended June 30, 2011
(in thousands)	Light building products			Heavy construction materials			Energy technology			Corporate			Totals
Segment revenue	$	91,635		$	62,435		$	6,587		$	0		$	160,657
Depreciation and amortization	$	(9,746	)	$	(3,455	)	$	(597	)	$	(16	)	$	(13,814	)
Operating income (loss)	$	6,246		$	7,672		$	1,200		$	(1,553	)	$	13,565
Net interest expense													(13,337		)
Other income (expense), net													1,703
Income tax benefit													100
Income from continuing operations													2,031
Loss from discontinued operations, net ofincome taxes													(8,379		)
Net loss													$	(6,348	)
Capital expenditures and payments foracquisitions, including $1,160 in theenergy technology segment related todiscontinued operations	$	3,501		$	458		$	1,220		$	0		$	5,179
Segment assets	$	309,628		$	303,252		$	107,014		$	49,389		$	769,283

	Three Months Ended June 30, 2012
(in thousands)	Light building products			Heavy construction materials			Energy technology			Corporate			Totals
Segment revenue	$	97,164		$	74,728		$	3,729		$	0		$	175,621
Depreciation and amortization	$	(8,803	)	$	(3,145	)	$	(573	)	$	(47	)	$	(12,568	)
Operating income (loss)	$	12,011		$	11,766		$	(1,174	)	$	(6,673	)	$	15,930
Net interest expense													(15,975		)
Other income (expense), net													57
Income tax benefit													2,030
Income from continuing operations													2,042
Loss from discontinued operations, net ofincome taxes													(15,078		)
Net loss													$	(13,036	)
Capital expenditures and payments foracquisitions, including $5 in theenergy technology segment related todiscontinued operations	$	4,448		$	2,152		$	125		$	648		$	7,373
Segment assets, including $14,647 in theenergy technology segment related todiscontinued operations	$	279,624		$	300,062		$	32,947		$	33,185		$	645,818

9

HEADWATERS INCORPORATED

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

June 30, 2012

(Unaudited)

	Nine Months Ended June 30, 2011
(in thousands)	Light building products			Heavy construction materials			Energy technology			Corporate			Totals
Segment revenue	$	224,021		$	170,746		$	14,914		$	0		$	409,681
Depreciation and amortization	$	(28,109	)	$	(10,359	)	$	(1,738	)	$	(72	)	$	(40,278	)
Operating income (loss)	$	(8,991	)	$	15,803		$	(14,860	)	$	(11,329	)	$	(19,377	)
Net interest expense													(112,827		)
Other income (expense), net													4,525
Income tax provision													(2,920		)
Loss from continuing operations													(130,599		)
Loss from discontinued operations, net ofincome taxes													(52,590		)
Net loss													$	(183,189	)
Capital expenditures and payments foracquisitions, including $4,147 in theenergy technology segment related todiscontinued operations	$	13,942		$	1,585		$	4,261		$	0		$	19,788

	Nine Months Ended June 30, 2012
(in thousands)	Light building products			Heavy construction materials			Energy technology			Corporate			Totals
Segment revenue	$	244,809		$	189,105		$	8,766		$	0		$	442,680
Depreciation and amortization	$	(26,775	)	$	(10,169	)	$	(1,717	)	$	(103	)	$	(38,764	)
Operating income (loss)	$	14,892		$	23,390		$	(3,881	)	$	(15,856	)	$	18,545
Net interest expense													(41,958		)
Other income (expense), net													(4,253		)
Income tax provision													(1,800		)
Loss from continuing operations													(29,466		)
Loss from discontinued operations, net ofincome taxes													(27,876		)
Net loss													$	(57,342	)
Capital expenditures and payments foracquisitions, including $1,121 in theenergy technology segment related todiscontinued operations	$	13,321		$	3,576		$	1,453		$	855		$	19,205

3.Discontinued Operations

Headwaters assessed the strategic fit of its various operations and is pursuing divestiture of certain businesses in the energy technology segment which do not align with its long-term strategy. In September 2011, the Board of Directors committed to a plan to sell the coal cleaning business, which is part of the energy technology segment, and at that time the business met all the criteria for classification as held for sale and presentation as a discontinued operation. Accordingly, the assets and liabilities associated with the coal cleaning business have been reflected as held for sale in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. The results of Headwaters’ coal cleaning operations have been presented as discontinued operations for all periods presented.

10

HEADWATERS INCORPORATED

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

June 30, 2012

(Unaudited)

Certain summarized information for the discontinued coal cleaning business is presented in the following table.

	Three Months Ended June 30,						Nine Months Ended June 30,
(in thousands)	2011			2012			2011			2012
Revenue	$	9,897		$	6,586		$	40,258		$	16,384
Loss from operations of discontinued operations beforeincome taxes	$	(6,479	)	$	(15,345	)	$	(50,410	)	$	(28,143	)
Gain on disposal	0			267			0			267
Income tax provision	(1,900		)	0			(2,180		)	0
Loss from discontinued operations, net of income taxes	$	(8,379	)	$	(15,078	)	$	(52,590	)	$	(27,876	)

During the March 2011 quarter, Headwaters recorded an impairment of the coal cleaning assets totaling $37.0 million. During the June 2012 quarter, Headwaters recorded an impairment of the coal cleaning assets totaling $13.0 million, which reduced the remaining book value for the coal cleaning assets, net of liabilities, to near $0. Current assets held for sale consist primarily of accounts receivable and inventory. Non-current assets held for sale consist of approximately $16.1 million and $1.9 million of property, plant and equipment and approximately $8.3 million and $5.9 million of other assets, as of September 30, 2011 and June 30, 2012, respectively, all of which are recorded at the lower of historical carrying amount or fair value. Liabilities held for sale consist primarily of accrued liabilities.

Headwaters sold one coal cleaning facility during the June 2012 quarter for cash proceeds of $2.0 million plus potential future consideration totaling approximately $8.4 million, which amount would be received over a number of years, depending upon future plant production levels. Headwaters currently expects to sell all, or substantially all, of the remaining business before the end of calendar 2012. If assumptions regarding future cash flows from the sale of the coal cleaning assets prove to be incorrect, Headwaters may be required to record a loss or a gain when the assets are sold.

4.Inventories

Inventories consisted of the following at:

(in thousands)	September 30, 2011		June 30, 2012
Raw materials	$	9,370	$	7,967
Finished goods	23,877		24,364
	$	33,247	$	32,331

5.Intangible Assets

All of Headwaters’ identified intangible assets are being amortized. The following table summarizes the gross carrying amounts and related accumulated amortization of intangible assets as of:

		September 30, 2011				June 30, 2012
(in thousands)	Estimated useful lives	Gross Carrying Amount		Accumulated Amortization		Gross Carrying Amount		Accumulated Amortization
CCP contracts	8 - 20 years	$	117,690	$	58,643	$	106,400	$	52,049
Customer relationships	5 - 15 years	77,914		38,454		72,464		37,084
Trade names	5 - 20 years	67,890		23,608		67,890		26,231
Patents and patentedtechnologies	2 - 19 years	54,736		36,296		55,087		40,314
Other	2 - 17 years	4,985		1,993		3,760		1,091
		$	323,215	$	158,994	$	305,601	$	156,769

11

HEADWATERS INCORPORATED

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

June 30, 2012

(Unaudited)

The decreases during 2012 in gross carrying amount and accumulated amortization are attributable to fully amortized assets that have been removed from the respective accounts. Total amortization expense related to intangible assets was approximately $5.7 million and $4.9 million for the quarters ended June 30, 2011 and 2012, respectively. Total amortization expense was approximately $16.8 million and $15.7 million for the nine months ended June 30, 2011 and 2012, respectively. Total estimated annual amortization expense for fiscal years 2012 through 2017 is shown in the following table.

Year ending September 30:	(in thousands)
2012	$	20,676
2013	19,746
2014	19,203
2015	15,056
2016	14,800
2017	13,921

6.Long-term Debt

The total undiscounted face amount of Headwaters’ outstanding long-term debt was $543.1 million as of September 30, 2011 and $508.4 million as of June 30, 2012. As of those dates, long-term debt consisted of the following:

(in thousands)	September 30, 2011			June 30,2012
7-5/8% Senior secured notes, due April 2019	$	400,000		$	400,000
Convertible senior subordinated notes:
2.50%, due 2014 (face amount $120,900 at September 30, 2011 and $58,609at June 30, 2012), net of discount	106,688			53,841
8.75%, due 2016 (face amount $49,791), net of discount	0			49,221
14.75% (face amount $12,965), net of discount	12,101			0
16% (face amount $9,233), net of discount	9,014			0
Total convertible senior subordinated notes, net of applicable discounts	127,803			103,062
	527,803			503,062
Less current portion	(9,014		)	0
Carrying amount of long-term debt, net of discounts	$	518,789		$	503,062

7-5/8% Senior Secured Notes — In March 2011, Headwaters issued $400.0 million of 7-5/8% senior secured notes for net proceeds of approximately $392.8 million. Headwaters used most of the net proceeds to repay the former 11-3/8% senior secured notes and the related early repayment premium of approximately $59.0 million (which premium was charged to interest expense). The 11-3/8% notes were issued at a discount which was being amortized to interest expense over the original term of the debt. Upon early repayment in March 2011, the remaining unamortized balances of approximately $2.2 million of debt discount and $6.6 million of debt issue costs were written off and charged to interest expense, as was $1.1 million of banking fees related to the tender offer.

The 7-5/8% notes mature in April 2019 and bear interest at a rate of 7.625%, payable semiannually. The notes are secured by substantially all assets of Headwaters; however, the note holders have a second priority position with respect to the assets that secure the ABL Revolver, currently consisting of certain trade receivables and inventories of Headwaters’ light building products and heavy construction materials segments. The notes are senior in priority to all other outstanding and future subordinated debt.

Headwaters can redeem the 7-5/8% notes, in whole or in part, at any time after March 2015 at redemption prices ranging from 103.8% to 100.0%, depending on the redemption date. In addition, through March 2014 Headwaters can redeem at a price of 107.6% up to 35% of the outstanding notes with the net proceeds from one or more equity offerings. Headwaters

12

HEADWATERS INCORPORATED

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

June 30, 2012

(Unaudited)

can also redeem up to 10% of the notes in any 12-month period through March 2014 at a price of 103%, and can redeem any portion of the notes at any time through March 2015 at a price equal to 100% plus a make-whole premium.

The senior secured notes limit Headwaters in the incurrence of additional debt and liens on assets, prepayment of future subordinated debt, merging or consolidating with another company, selling all or substantially all assets, making investments and the payment of dividends or distributions, among other things. Headwaters was in compliance with all debt covenants as of June 30, 2012.

ABL Revolver — Since entering into the ABL Revolver, Headwaters has not borrowed any funds under the arrangement and has no borrowings outstanding as of June 30, 2012. Availability under the ABL Revolver cannot exceed $70.0 million, which includes a $35.0 million sub-line for letters of credit and a $10.5 million swingline facility. Availability under the ABL Revolver is further limited by the borrowing base valuations of the assets of Headwaters’ light building products and heavy construction materials segments which secure the borrowings, currently consisting of certain trade receivables and inventories. In addition to the first lien position on these assets, the ABL Revolver lenders have a second priority position on substantially all other assets of Headwaters. During the 2011 fiscal year, Headwaters secured a letter of credit under terms of the ABL Revolver for approximately $16.1 million in order to post bond in connection with the filing of an appeal in the Boynton matter described in Note 12. Headwaters has also secured additional letters of credit for approximately $2.8 million for other purposes. As of June 30, 2012, availability under the ABL Revolver was approximately $51.1 million.

Outstanding borrowings under the ABL Revolver accrue interest at Headwaters’ option, at either i) the London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR) plus 2.25%, 2.50% or 2.75%, depending on Headwaters’ fixed charge coverage ratio; or ii) the “Base Rate” plus 1.0%, 1.25% or 1.5%, again depending on the fixed charge coverage ratio. The base rate is subject to a floor equal to the highest of i) the prime rate, ii) the federal funds rate plus 0.5%, and iii) the 30-day LIBOR rate plus 1.0%. Fees on the unused portion of the ABL Revolver range from 0.25% to 0.50%, depending on the amount of the credit facility which is utilized. If there would have been borrowings outstanding under the ABL Revolver as of June 30, 2012, the interest rate on those borrowings would have been approximately 3.2%. The ABL Revolver has a termination date of October 2014, with a contingent provision for early termination three months prior to the earliest maturity date of the senior secured notes or any of the convertible senior subordinated notes (currently November 2013), at which time any amounts borrowed must be repaid. The contingent provision for early termination is precluded if, three months prior to any note maturity date, borrowing base capacity under the ABL Revolver and / or cash collateral is at least equivalent to the notes maturing on such date.

The ABL Revolver contains restrictions and covenants common to such agreements, including limitations on the incurrence of additional debt and liens on assets, prepayment of subordinated debt, merging or consolidating with another company, selling assets, making capital expenditures, making acquisitions and investments and the payment of dividends or distributions, among other things. In addition, if availability under the ABL Revolver is less than a specified percentage (15%), Headwaters is required to maintain a monthly fixed charge coverage ratio of at least 1.0x for the preceding twelve-month period. Headwaters was in compliance with all covenants as of June 30, 2012.

Convertible Senior Subordinated Notes — The Form 10-K includes a detailed description of all of Headwaters’ convertible senior subordinated notes that were in existence as of September 30, 2011. In June 2012, Headwaters issued approximately $49.8 million of new 8.75% convertible senior subordinated notes (8.75% notes) in exchange for cancellation of an equal amount of outstanding 2.50% convertible senior subordinated notes (2.50% notes), plus a cash payment of approximately $0.6 million. The unamortized balances of debt discount and debt issue costs related to the $49.8 million of retired 2.50% notes, aggregating approximately $4.5 million, were written off and charged to interest expense. The 8.75% notes have a maturity date of February 2016 with no early redemption options for either Headwaters or the holders of the notes. Other than the different interest rate and two-year extended maturity date, the terms of the 8.75% notes, including the significant terms of conversion, are similar in all material respects to the terms of the 2.50% notes as described in the Form 10-K. Headwaters’ Chairman and CEO was a holder of $1.15 million of the 2.50% notes that were exchanged for 8.75% notes, which exchange was approved by the Board of Directors and occurred under the same terms as for the other exchange participants.

13

HEADWATERS INCORPORATED

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

June 30, 2012

(Unaudited)

In the December 2011 quarter, Headwaters repurchased and canceled $7.5 million in aggregate principal amount of the 2.50% notes for cash consideration of approximately $5.5 million. The $2.0 million gain was recorded in other income. Accelerated debt discount and debt issue costs aggregating approximately $0.9 million were charged to interest expense. In the March 2012 quarter, Headwaters repurchased and canceled approximately $12.0 million of the 14.75% notes. Terms of repayment included premiums of approximately $1.6 million, which were charged to interest expense. Accelerated debt discount and debt issue costs aggregating approximately $0.7 million were also charged to interest expense.

In the June 2012 quarter, Headwaters repurchased and canceled the remaining $1.0 million outstanding balance of 14.75% notes, which repurchase included a premium of approximately $0.1 million. The premium and accelerated debt discount and debt issue costs aggregating approximately $0.2 million were charged to interest expense. Also in the June 2012 quarter, Headwaters redeemed at par the remaining $9.2 million of 16% notes and repurchased and canceled $5.0 million in aggregate principal amount of the 2.50% notes for cash consideration of approximately $4.7 million. The $0.3 million gain was recorded in other income. Accelerated debt discount and debt issue costs aggregating approximately $0.5 million were charged to interest expense.

Interest and Debt Maturities — During the June 2011 and 2012 quarters, Headwaters incurred total interest costs of approximately $13.4 million and $16.0 million, respectively, including approximately $2.6 million and $6.8 million, respectively, of non-cash interest expense. During the nine months ended June 30, 2011 and 2012, Headwaters incurred total interest costs of approximately $113.1 million and $42.2 million, respectively, including approximately $17.1 million and $12.7 million, respectively, of non-cash interest expense and approximately $0.1 million of interest costs that were capitalized in both periods. Interest expense for the nine months ended June 30, 2011 includes approximately $59.0 million of early repayment premium related to the retirement of the 11-3/8% senior secured notes in March 2011.

Interest income was approximately $0.1 million and $0 in the June 2011 and 2012 quarters, respectively, and $0.2 million and $0.1 million for the nine months ended June 30, 2011 and 2012, respectively. The weighted-average interest rate on the face amount of outstanding long-term debt, excluding amortization of debt discount and debt issue costs, was approximately 6.8% at September 30, 2011 and 7.1% at June 30, 2012. There are currently no maturities of debt prior to February 2014.

7.Fair Value of Financial Instruments

Headwaters’ financial instruments consist primarily of cash and cash equivalents, trade receivables, accounts payable and long-term debt. All of these financial instruments except long-term debt are either carried at fair value in the consolidated balance sheets or are short-term in nature. Accordingly, the carrying values for those financial instruments as reflected in the consolidated balance sheets closely approximate their fair values.

All of Headwaters’ outstanding long-term debt as of September 30, 2011 and June 30, 2012 was fixed-rate. Using fair values for the debt, the aggregate fair value of Headwaters’ long-term debt as of September 30, 2011 would have been approximately $427.0 million, compared to a carrying value of $527.8 million, and the aggregate fair value as of June 30, 2012 would have been approximately $501.0 million, compared to a carrying value of $503.1 million.

Fair value “Level 2” estimates for long-term debt were based primarily on discounted future cash flows using estimated current risk-adjusted borrowing rates for similar instruments. The fair values for long-term debt differ from the carrying values primarily due to interest rates that differ from current market interest rates and differences between Headwaters’ common stock price at the balance sheet measurement dates and the conversion prices for the convertible senior subordinated notes.

8.Income Taxes

Headwaters’ estimated effective income tax rate for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2012, exclusive of discrete items, is currently expected to be approximately negative (12)%, which estimated rate was used to calculate income taxes for the June 2012 quarter and nine-month periods. Headwaters has also recognized approximately $1.5 million of

14

HEADWATERS INCORPORATED

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

June 30, 2012

(Unaudited)

net income tax benefit for discrete items that did not affect the calculation of the estimated effective income tax rate for the 2012 fiscal year. A majority of the benefit recognized for discrete items represented adjustments related to unrecognized income tax benefits. For the nine months ended June 30, 2011, Headwaters used an estimated effective income tax rate of negative (1)%, excluding approximately $3.2 million of income tax expense for discrete items.

Headwaters utilized its fiscal 2009 and prior year federal net operating losses (NOLs) by carrying those amounts back to prior years, receiving income tax refunds. NOLs and tax credit carryforwards for fiscal 2010 were offset by Headwaters’ existing deferred income tax liabilities resulting in a near $0 deferred tax position as of September 30, 2010. In fiscal 2011, Headwaters recorded a full valuation allowance on its net amortizable deferred tax assets, a situation that is also expected to continue throughout fiscal 2012. Accordingly, Headwaters does not expect to recognize any benefit for pre-tax losses and tax credits in fiscal 2012. A valuation allowance is required when there is significant uncertainty as to the realizability of deferred tax assets. Because the realization of Headwaters’ deferred tax assets is dependent upon future income in domestic and foreign jurisdictions that have generated losses, management determined that Headwaters does not meet the “more likely than not” threshold that NOLs, tax credits and deferred tax assets will be realized. Accordingly, a valuation allowance is required.

The estimated effective income tax rate for fiscal 2012 of negative (12)% is due primarily to the combination of not recognizing benefit for expected pre-tax losses and tax credits, but recognizing current state income taxes in certain state jurisdictions where Headwaters expects to generate taxable income. As of June 30, 2012, Headwaters’ NOL and capital loss carryforwards total approximately $70.9 million (tax effected). The U.S. and state NOLs and capital losses expire from 2012 to 2032. Substantially all of the non-U.S. NOLs do not expire. In addition, there are approximately $22.8 million of tax credit carryforwards as of June 30, 2012, which expire from 2014 to 2032.

The estimated effective tax rate for fiscal 2011 of negative (1)%, which was used to calculate income taxes for the 2011 periods, exclusive of discrete items, resulted from the same factors as the expected negative tax rate for 2012. The discrete items recorded during 2011 consisted primarily of changes in the valuation allowance and uncertain tax positions.

The calculation of tax liabilities involves uncertainties in the application of complex tax regulations in multiple tax jurisdictions. During 2012, Headwaters reached a tentative agreement with the IRS for the 2009 fiscal year examination, which, as of June 30, 2012, has not resulted in any material changes to earnings or tax-related liabilities. Headwaters currently has open tax years subject to examination by the IRS or other taxing authorities for the years 2009 through 2011. Headwaters recognizes potential liabilities for anticipated tax audit issues in the U.S. and state tax jurisdictions based on estimates of whether, and the extent to which, additional taxes and interest will be due. If events occur (or do not occur) as expected and the payment of these amounts ultimately proves to be unnecessary, the reversal of the liabilities would result in tax benefits being recognized in the period when it is determined the liabilities are no longer required to be recorded in the consolidated financial statements. If the estimate of tax liabilities proves to be less than the ultimate assessment, a further charge to expense would result. It is reasonably possible that approximately $1.5 million to $3.0 million of Headwaters’ unrecognized income tax benefits will be released within the next 12 months, depending on the timing of ongoing examinations, the expiration of statute of limitation time periods and other factors.

9.Equity Securities and Stock-Based Compensation

Shelf Registration — Headwaters filed a universal shelf registration statement with the SEC under which $210.0 million is available for future offerings of securities. A prospectus supplement describing the terms of any additional securities to be issued is required to be filed before any future offering could commence under the registration statement.

Stock-Based Compensation — Stock-based compensation expense was approximately $0.9 million and $0.5 million for the June 2011 and 2012 quarters, respectively, and $3.0 million and $1.4 million for the nine months ended June 30, 2011 and 2012, respectively. As of June 30, 2012, there was approximately $1.2 million of total compensation cost related to unvested awards not yet recognized, which will be recognized in future periods in accordance with applicable vesting terms.

15

HEADWATERS INCORPORATED

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

June 30, 2012

(Unaudited)

Treasury Shares Held for Deferred Compensation Obligation — In accordance with the terms of the new Directors’ Deferred Compensation Plan (DDCP) described in Note 12, non-employee directors can elect to defer certain compensation and choose from various options how the deferred compensation will be invested. One of the investment options is Headwaters common stock. When an eligible director chooses Headwaters’ stock as an investment option, Headwaters purchases the common stock in accordance with the director’s request and holds the shares until such time as the deferred compensation obligation becomes payable, normally when the director retires from the Board. At such time, the shares held by Headwaters will be distributed to the director in satisfaction of the obligation. Headwaters accounts for the purchase of common stock as treasury stock, at cost, and the corresponding deferred compensation obligation is reflected in capital in excess of par value. Changes in the fair value of the treasury stock are not recognized. As of June 30, 2012, the treasury stock and related deferred compensation obligation had a fair value of approximately $0.1 million, which amount was not significantly different from the carrying value at cost.

10.Earnings per Share

The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted EPS for the periods indicated. In accordance with ASC 260, income (loss) from continuing operations for each period was used as the control number in determining whether potentially dilutive common shares should be included in the diluted earnings per share computations for those periods, even when the effect of doing so was anti-dilutive to the other per-share amounts.

	Three Months EndedJune 30,						Nine Months EndedJune 30,
(in thousands, except per-share data)	2011			2012			2011			2012
Numerator:
Numerator for basic and diluted earnings per share from continuingoperations — income (loss) from continuing operations	$	2,031		$	2,042		$	(130,599	)	$	(29,466	)
Numerator for basic and diluted earnings per share from discontinuedoperations — loss from discontinued operations, net of income taxes	(8,379		)	(15,078		)	(52,590		)	(27,876		)
Numerator for basic and diluted earnings per share — net loss	$	(6,348	)	$	(13,036	)	$	(183,189	)	$	(57,342	)
Denominator:
Denominator for basic earnings per share — weighted-average sharesoutstanding	60,474			60,931			60,408			60,871
Effect of dilutive securities — shares issuable upon exercise of SARsand options and vesting of restricted stock	0			494			0			0
Denominator for diluted earnings per share — weighted-average sharesoutstanding after assumed exercises and vesting	60,474			61,425			60,408			60,871
Basic and diluted earnings (loss) per share from continuing operations	$	0.04		$	0.03		$	(2.16	)	$	(0.48	)
Basic and diluted loss per share from discontinued operations	(0.14		)	(0.24		)	(0.87		)	(0.46		)
Basic and diluted loss per share	$	(0.10	)	$	(0.21	)	$	(3.03	)	$	(0.94	)
Anti-dilutive securities not considered in diluted EPS calculation:
SARs	2,931			2,243			2,825			3,432
Stock options	1,568			1,367			1,717			1,423
Restricted stock	0			0			70			55

11.Restructuring Costs

Headwaters recorded restructuring costs in the 2011 fiscal year and during the six months ended March 31, 2012 as a result of actions taken to lower operating costs and improve operational efficiency, primarily in the light building products segment. As reflected in the following table, the charges represent costs for workforce reductions and related

16

HEADWATERS INCORPORATED

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

June 30, 2012

(Unaudited)

severance expenses, facility closures and consolidations, and certain asset impairments and write-downs. The restructuring was initiated in fiscal 2011 primarily due to the depressed new housing and residential remodeling markets. This restructuring effort was completed in the March 2012 quarter and no additional restructuring costs related to the 2011 actions have been incurred since that time.

(in thousands)	Expenses incurred in fiscal 2011		Expenses incurred in fiscal 2012		Total expensesincurred
Workforce reductions and related severance expenses	$	4,124	$	519	$	4,643
Facility closures and consolidations	7,213		838		8,051
Asset impairments and write-downs	6,593		788		7,381
Total restructuring costs	$	17,930	$	2,145	$	20,075

Most of the expenses related to workforce reductions and related severance and approximately half of the expenses related to facility closures and consolidations have resulted or will result in cash outlays. None of the asset impairments and write-downs resulted in cash outlays.

The following table shows the activity in the restructuring cost liability accrual through June 30, 2012. A majority of the remaining unpaid balance as of June 30, 2012 is currently expected to be paid in years subsequent to fiscal 2012 because it relates to lease obligations under long-term facility leases.

	(in thousands)
Balance as of September 30, 2010	$	0
Costs incurred	7,370
Costs paid	(2,932		)
Balance as of September 30, 2011	$	4,438
Costs incurred	1,357
Costs paid	(3,813		)
Balance as of June 30, 2012	$	1,982

12.Commitments and Contingencies

Significant new commitments, material changes in commitments and ongoing contingencies as of June 30, 2012, not disclosed elsewhere, are as follows:

Compensation Arrangements — Cash Performance Unit Awards. In 2009, the Compensation Committee (Committee) approved grants of performance unit awards to certain officers and employees, to be settled in cash, based on the achievement of goals tied to cumulative divisional free cash flow generated subsequent to September 30, 2008 and prior to September 30, 2028. For these awards, free cash flow is generally defined as operating income plus depreciation, amortization and asset impairments, reduced by capital expenditures. Payments vest according to a predetermined schedule as free cash flow accumulates over time.

In 2010, the Committee terminated the performance unit awards for all participants in the corporate business unit and assigned a five-year performance period ending September 30, 2013 to the free cash flow goals, aggregating $850.0 million, for the remaining participating business units. Through June 30, 2012, the remaining business units had generated approximately $286.6 million of free cash flow and incurred approximately $3.3 million of expense for these awards, including approximately $2.6 million which was accrued and unpaid as of June 30, 2012. The maximum payout under the amended performance unit awards if all performance criteria were to be achieved by all participating operating divisions would be approximately $28.1 million; however, due to the shortened five-year term of the performance period, the ultimate payout will be significantly less than the maximum potential payout.

17

HEADWATERS INCORPORATED

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

June 30, 2012

(Unaudited)

Also in 2010, in accordance with terms of the 2010 ICP, the Committee approved grants of performance unit awards to certain officers and employees in the corporate business unit, to be settled in cash, based on the achievement of goals related to consolidated free cash flow generated in the second half of fiscal 2010. For purposes of these awards, free cash flow is generally defined as operating income plus depreciation, amortization, asset impairments and Section 45 tax credits, reduced by capital expenditures. The awards were calculated using a target compensation amount for each participant and were adjusted, subject to prescribed limitations, based on the actual consolidated free cash flow generated during the six-month performance period ended September 30, 2010, using a threshold/target/maximum adjustment structure. The actual free cash flow generated during the performance period exceeded the maximum level, and the awards provided for 50% vesting as of September 30, 2011, with the remaining 50% to be vested as of September 30, 2012, provided the participant is still employed by Headwaters on the vest dates. Prior to settlement in cash, the awards are further adjusted using Headwaters’ average stock price for the 60 days immediately preceding each vest date.

During the nine months ended June 30, 2012, Headwaters recorded approximately $0.8 million of expense for the 2010 performance unit awards due to an increase in the average 60-day stock price between September 30, 2011 and June 30, 2012. The change in Headwaters’ stock price through the final vest date of September 30, 2012 will result in adjustment of the expected liability, which adjustment (whether positive or negative) will be reflected in Headwaters’ statement of operations for the September 2012 quarter. Assuming the average closing stock price for the 60 days in the period ended June 30, 2012 of $4.35 remains unchanged for the September 30, 2012 vest date, the total payouts under this arrangement, all of which have been accrued as of June 30, 2012, would be approximately $1.5 million.

In fiscal 2011, in accordance with terms of the 2010 ICP, the Committee approved grants of performance unit awards to participants in the corporate business unit related to consolidated free cash flow generated during fiscal year 2011, with terms similar to those described above for 2010. Because the actual consolidated free cash flow generated during fiscal 2011 was below the threshold, these awards did not vest and no liability was recorded. During the December 2011 quarter, the Committee approved grants to participants in the corporate business unit related to consolidated free cash flow generated during fiscal 2012, again with terms similar to those described above for 2010. As of June 30, 2012, approximately $4.2 million has been recorded for the 2012 grants.

Cash-Settled SAR Grants.  In fiscal 2011, the Committee approved grants to certain employees of approximately 0.4 million cash-settled SARs. These SARs vest in annual installments through September 30, 2013, provided the participant is still employed at the respective vest dates, and will be settled in cash upon exercise by the employee. The SARs terminate on September 30, 2015 and must be exercised on or before that date. As of June 30, 2012, approximately $0.3 million has been accrued for these awards because the stock price at June 30, 2012 was above the grant-date stock price of $3.81. Future changes in Headwaters’ stock price in any amount beyond the grant-date stock price of $3.81 through September 30, 2015 will result in adjustment to the expected liability, which adjustment (whether positive or negative) will be reflected in Headwaters’ statement of operations each quarter.

During the December 2011 quarter, the Committee approved grants to certain officers and employees of approximately 1.0 million cash-settled SARs, with terms similar to those described above, except that these SARs could not vest until and unless the 60-day average stock price exceeded approximately 135% of the stock price on the date of grant (or $2.50), which threshold must occur prior to September 30, 2014. The 60-day average stock price exceeded the required threshold during the March 2012 quarter and approximately $1.5 million has been accrued for these awards as of June 30, 2012. Changes in Headwaters’ stock price in any amount beyond the grant-date stock price of $1.85 through September 30, 2016 will result in adjustment to the expected liability, which adjustment (whether positive or negative) will be reflected in Headwaters’ statement of operations each quarter.

Directors’ Deferred Compensation Plan (DDCP).  In January 2012, the Board of Directors approved a new deferred compensation plan for non-employee directors of Headwaters. The DDCP is a nonqualified plan that allows Headwaters and eligible directors to make tax-deferred contributions of certain cash compensation. Expenses incurred under the DDCP during the nine months ended June 30, 2012 were approximately $0.3 million.

18

HEADWATERS INCORPORATED

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

June 30, 2012

(Unaudited)

Property, Plant and Equipment — As of June 30, 2012, Headwaters was committed to spend approximately $1.4 million on capital projects that were in various stages of completion.

Legal Matters — Headwaters has ongoing litigation and asserted claims which have been incurred during the normal course of business, including the specific matters discussed below. Headwaters intends to vigorously defend or resolve these matters by settlement, as appropriate. Management does not currently believe that the outcome of these matters will have a material adverse effect on Headwaters’ operations, cash flow or financial position.

Historically, until fiscal 2011, costs paid to outside legal counsel for litigation comprised a majority of Headwaters’ litigation-related costs. During the nine months ended June 30, 2011 and 2012, Headwaters incurred approximately $16.2 million and $1.5 million, respectively, of expense for legal matters. Headwaters currently believes the range of potential loss for all unresolved legal matters, excluding costs for outside counsel, is from $16.0 million up to the amounts sought by claimants and has recorded a total liability as of June 30, 2012 of $16.0 million, of which $15.0 million was incurred during the March 2011 quarter. Claims and damages sought by claimants in excess of this amount are not deemed to be probable. Headwaters’ outside counsel and management currently believe that unfavorable outcomes of outstanding litigation are neither probable nor remote. Accordingly, management cannot express an opinion as to the ultimate amount, if any, of Headwaters’ liability, nor is it possible to estimate what litigation-related costs will be in future periods.

The specific matters discussed below raise difficult and complex legal and factual issues, and the resolution of these issues is subject to many uncertainties, including the facts and circumstances of each case, the jurisdiction in which each case is brought, and the future decisions of juries, judges, and arbitrators. Therefore, although management believes that the claims asserted against Headwaters in the named cases lack merit, there is a possibility of material losses in excess of the amounts accrued if one or more of the cases were to be determined adversely against Headwaters for a substantial amount of the damages asserted. It is possible that a change in the estimates of probable liability could occur, and the changes could be material. Additionally, as with any litigation, these proceedings require that Headwaters incur substantial costs, including attorneys’ fees, managerial time and other personnel resources, in pursuing resolution.

Boynton.  In 1998, Headwaters entered into a technology purchase agreement with James G. Davidson and Adtech, Inc. The transaction transferred certain patent and royalty rights to Headwaters related to a synthetic fuel technology invented by Davidson. In 2002, Headwaters received a summons and complaint from the United States District Court for the Western District of Tennessee filed by former stockholders of Adtech alleging, among other things, fraud, conspiracy, constructive trust, conversion, patent infringement and interference with contract arising out of the 1998 technology purchase agreement entered into between Davidson and Adtech on the one hand, and Headwaters on the other. All claims against Headwaters were dismissed in pretrial proceedings except claims of conspiracy and constructive trust. The District Court certified a class comprised of substantially all purported stockholders of Adtech, Inc. The plaintiffs sought compensatory damages from Headwaters in the approximate amount of $43.0 million plus prejudgment interest and punitive damages. In June 2009, a jury reached a verdict in a trial in the amount of $8.7 million for the eight named plaintiffs representing a portion of the class members. In September 2010, a jury reached a verdict after a trial for the remaining 46 members of the class in the amount of $7.3 million.  In April 2011, the trial court entered an order for a constructive trust in the amount of approximately $16.0 million (the same amount as the sum of the previous jury verdicts), denied all other outstanding motions, and entered judgment against Headwaters in the total approximate amount of $16.0 million, in accordance with the verdicts and order on constructive trust. The $16.0 million is fully accrued. The court denied all post-judgment motions by the parties. Headwaters filed a supersedeas bond and a notice of appeal from the judgment to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. Plaintiffs also filed notice of an appeal. The Federal Circuit has transferred the case to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit on the basis of jurisdiction. Because the resolution of the litigation is uncertain, legal counsel and management cannot express an opinion as to the ultimate amount, if any, of Headwaters’ liability.

EPA.  In April 2012, Headwaters Resources, Inc. (HRI) filed a complaint in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia against the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). The complaint alleges that the EPA has failed to review, and where necessary, revise applicable RCRA subtitle D regulations applicable to the disposal

19

HEADWATERS INCORPORATED

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

June 30, 2012

(Unaudited)

of coal ash within the timeframe required by statute. Other parties also have initiated litigation against the EPA alleging the same (and other) failures of the EPA to perform its duties regarding coal ash disposal regulations. HRI’s complaint seeks declaratory relief and should provide HRI an opportunity to represent its interests before the court makes orders with respect to EPA rulemaking at issue in the case. The court has consolidated HRI’s case with related actions brought by other parties. Because the resolution of the litigation is uncertain, legal counsel and management cannot express an opinion as to the ultimate outcome.

Fentress Families Trust.  VFL Technology Corporation (VFL), acquired by HRI in 2004, provides services related to fly ash management to Virginia Electric and Power Company. In February 2012, 383 plaintiffs, most of whom are residents living in the City of Chesapeake, Virginia, filed a complaint in the State of Virginia Chesapeake Circuit Court against 15 defendants, including Virginia Electric and Power Company, and certain other persons associated with the Battlefield Golf Course, including owners, developers, contractors, and others, including VFL and Headwaters, alleging causes of action for nuisance and negligence. The complaint alleges that fly ash used to construct the golf course was carried in the air and contaminated water exposing plaintiffs to dangerous chemicals and causing property damage. Plaintiffs’ complaint seeks injunctive relief and damages of approximately $850.0 million for removal and remediation of the fly ash and the water supply, $1.9 billion for vexation, $8.0 million and other unspecified amounts for personal injuries, and $55.0 million as damages to properties, plus prejudgment interest, attorney fees, and costs. In a related case, other plaintiffs have filed a separate lawsuit asserting the same claims against the same defendants claiming additional damages totaling approximately $307.2 million. VFL and Headwaters have not yet been served with either complaint. These new cases are based on substantially the same alleged circumstances asserted in complaints filed by the plaintiffs in 2009 and voluntarily dismissed in 2010. HRI has filed insurance claims, which are the subject of dispute and a separate lawsuit, although insurance is paying for the defense of the underlying case. The amount of the claims against HRI exceeds the amount of insurance. Because resolution of the litigation is uncertain, legal counsel and management cannot express an opinion as to the ultimate amount, if any, of HRI’s liability, or the insurers’ obligation to indemnify HRI against loss, if any.

Neil Wallace.  The plaintiff, Neil Wallace, filed a complaint in the State of Virginia Chesapeake Circuit Court against Virginia Electric and Power Company and related entities (VEPCO), VFL and Headwaters alleging personal injuries arising from exposure to the fly ash used to build the golf course described in the Fentress Families Trust case. Plaintiff claims that he worked on the golf course site from 2002-2007 and that as a result, he contracted kidney cancer. Plaintiff was the managing member and corporate counsel of CPM Virginia, LLC (CPM). CPM was a fly ash manager for VEPCO and was an owner and developer of the golf course. Plaintiff claims damages of $10.0 million. VFL and HRI have not yet been served with the complaint. HRI expects that its insurers will defend and indemnify HRI and VFL. Because resolution of the litigation is uncertain, legal counsel and management cannot express an opinion as to the ultimate amount, if any, of HRI’s liability, or the insurers’ obligation to indemnify HRI against loss, if any.

Oxford Mining Company.  In 2007, Covol Fuels No. 2, LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of Headwaters Energy Services Corp. (Covol), entered into an agreement for the sale of coal produced by Covol from certain operations in Kentucky.  In 2009, the agreement was assigned by the buyer to Oxford Mining Company—Kentucky, LLC (Oxford).  Covol claims that the economically recoverable source coal for the agreement is exhausted and that as a result, the agreement has terminated.  In October 2011, Covol filed a petition in the Franklin Circuit Court of the Commonwealth of Kentucky seeking declaratory judgment that the agreement has terminated.  In December 2011, Oxford answered, denying that the agreement was terminated and requesting that the court dismiss Covol’s petition.  Oxford also filed a counterclaim alleging that Covol is in breach of the agreement for failing to provide coal and that Oxford’s present and anticipated damages are estimated to be at least $5.0 million, in addition to its costs associated with the litigation, including attorneys’ fees.  Covol denies the counterclaim. Because the resolution of the litigation is uncertain, legal counsel and management cannot express an opinion as to the ultimate amount, if any, of Covol’s liability.

Reechcraft.  In 2006, Tapco International Corporation entered into a contract with Reechcraft, Inc. for Reechcraft to manufacture and supply sheet metal bending tools, accessories for those tools, and specialized scaffolding systems to Tapco. Reechcraft claims that Tapco failed to purchase the quantity of products required under the contract. In July 2012, Reechcraft filed a demand for arbitration with the American Arbitration Association in Chicago, Illinois, claiming

20

HEADWATERS INCORPORATED

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

June 30, 2012

(Unaudited)

damages of $3.1 million, in addition to interest, costs, and attorneys’ fees. Tapco denies Reechcraft’s allegations. Because the resolution of the arbitration is uncertain, legal counsel and management cannot express an opinion as to the ultimate amount, if any, of Tapco’s liability.

Archstone.  Archstone owns an apartment complex in Westbury, New York. Archstone alleges that moisture penetrated the building envelope and damaged moisture sensitive parts of the buildings which began to rot and grow mold. In 2008, Archstone evicted its tenants and began repairing the 21 apartment buildings. Also in 2008, Archstone filed a complaint in the Nassau County Supreme Court of the State of New York against the prime contractor and its performance bond surety, the designer, and Eldorado Stone, LLC which supplied architectural stone that was installed by others during construction. The prime contractor then sued over a dozen subcontractors who in turn sued others. Archstone claims as damages approximately $36.0 million in repair costs, $15.0 million in lost lease payments, $7.0 million paid to tenants who sued Archstone, and $7.0 million for class action defense fees, plus prejudgment interest and attorney’s fees. Eldorado Stone answered denying liability and tendered the matter to its insurers who are paying for the defense of the case. The court has dismissed all claims against Eldorado Stone, except the claim of negligence, and the parties are pursuing an interlocutory appeal of the order of dismissal. Meanwhile, discovery is underway. Because the resolution of the action is uncertain, legal counsel and management cannot express an opinion concerning the likely outcome of this matter, the liability of Eldorado Stone, if any, or the insurers’ obligation to indemnify Eldorado Stone against loss, if any.

Headwaters Building Products Matters.  There are litigation and pending and threatened claims made against certain subsidiaries of Headwaters Building Products (HBP), a division within Headwaters’ light building products segment, with respect to several types of exterior finish systems manufactured and sold by its subsidiaries for application by contractors on residential and commercial buildings. Typically, litigation and these claims are defended by such subsidiaries’ insurance carriers. The plaintiffs or claimants in these matters have alleged that the structures have suffered damage from latent or progressive water penetration due to some alleged failure of the building product or wall system. One claim involves alleged defects associated with components of an Exterior Insulating and Finish System (EIFS) which was produced for a limited time (through 1997) by the HBP subsidiaries. Other claims involve alleged liabilities associated with certain stucco, mortar, aerated concrete block and architectural stone products which are produced and sold by certain subsidiaries of HBP. The Archstone case summarized above is an example of these types of claims.

Typically, the claims cite damages for alleged personal injuries and punitive damages for alleged unfair business practices in addition to asserting more conventional damage claims for alleged economic loss and damage to property. To date, claims made against such subsidiaries have been paid by their insurers, with the exception of deductibles or self-insured retentions, although such insurance carriers typically have issued “reservation of rights” letters. There is no guarantee of insurance coverage or continuing coverage. These and future proceedings may result in substantial costs to HBP, including attorneys’ fees, managerial time and other personnel resources and costs. Adverse resolution of these proceedings could have a materially negative effect on HBP’s business, financial condition, and results of operation, and its ability to meet its financial obligations. Although HBP carries general and product liability insurance, HBP cannot assure that such insurance coverage will remain available, that HBP’s insurance carrier will remain viable, or that the insured amounts will cover all future claims in excess of HBP’s uninsured retention. Future rate increases may also make such insurance uneconomical for HBP to maintain. In addition, the insurance policies maintained by HBP exclude claims for damages resulting from exterior insulating finish systems, or EIFS, that have manifested after March 2003. Because resolution of the litigation and claims is uncertain, legal counsel and management cannot express an opinion as to the ultimate amount, if any, of HBP’s liability.

Other.  Headwaters and its subsidiaries are also involved in other legal proceedings that have arisen in the normal course of business.

13.Equity Method Investee

Investments in entities in which Headwaters has a significant influence over operating and financial decisions are accounted for using the equity method of accounting. One such equity method investee was Blue Flint Ethanol LLC

21

HEADWATERS INCORPORATED

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

June 30, 2012

(Unaudited)

(Blue Flint). Effective January 1, 2012, Headwaters sold its interest in Blue Flint for approximately $18.5 million. Subsequent to Headwaters’ initial investment in Blue Flint, equity earnings in excess of $15.0 million were recorded that increased Headwaters’ carrying value of the investment to an amount that was in excess of the sales proceeds. As a result, in December 2011, a non-cash loss of approximately $6.3 million was recorded in other expense in the statement of operations.

14.Condensed Consolidating Financial Information

Headwaters’ 7-5/8% senior secured notes are jointly and severally, fully and unconditionally guaranteed by Headwaters Incorporated and by all of Headwaters’ wholly-owned domestic subsidiaries. The non-guaranteeing entities include primarily joint ventures in which Headwaters had a non-controlling ownership interest. Separate stand-alone financial statements and disclosures for Headwaters Incorporated and each of the guarantor subsidiaries are not presented because the guarantees are full and unconditional and the guarantor subsidiaries have joint and several liability. There are no significant restrictions on the ability of Headwaters Incorporated to obtain funds from the guarantor subsidiaries nor on the ability of the guarantor subsidiaries to obtain funds from Headwaters Incorporated or other guarantor subsidiaries.

22

HEADWATERS INCORPORATED

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

June 30, 2012

(Unaudited)

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING BALANCE SHEET — September 30, 2011

	Guarantor			Non- guarantor			Parent			Eliminationsand			Headwaters
(in thousands)	Subsidiaries			Subsidiaries			Company			Reclassifications			Consolidated
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	36,122		$	—		$	14,688		$	—		$	50,810
Trade receivables, net	90,931												90,931
Inventories	33,247												33,247
Current and deferred income taxes	13,734						12,720			(23,367		)	3,087
Assets held for sale	6,777												6,777
Other	6,617						337						6,954
Total current assets	187,428			—			27,745			(23,367		)	191,806
Property, plant and equipment, net	164,446			—			263			—			164,709
Other assets:
Intangible assets, net	164,221												164,221
Goodwill	116,671												116,671
Assets held for sale	22,446						2,000						24,446
Investments in subsidiaries and intercompany accounts	321,026			(9,499		)	146,971			(458,498		)	—
Intercompany notes	(637,046		)				637,046						—
Deferred income taxes	89,158						21,670			(110,828		)	—
Other	19,263			24,376			22,745						66,384
Total other assets	95,739			14,877			830,432			(569,326		)	371,722
Total assets	$	447,613		$	14,877		$	858,440		$	(592,693	)	$	728,237
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable	$	18,397		$	—		$	582		$	—		$	18,979
Accrued personnel costs	10,677						12,353						23,030
Accrued interest							18,336						18,336
Liabilities held for sale	7,470												7,470
Current and deferred income taxes	21,981			2,588			(1,202		)	(23,367		)	—
Other accrued liabilities	43,544						1,843						45,387
Current portion of long-term debt							9,014						9,014
Total current liabilities	102,069			2,588			40,926			(23,367		)	122,216
Long-term liabilities:
Long-term debt							518,789						518,789
Deferred income taxes	92,752			(27		)	22,319			(110,828		)	4,216
Unrecognized income tax benefits	7,226						4,467						11,693
Liabilities held for sale	5,507												5,507
Other	3,158						5,922						9,080
Total long-term liabilities	108,643			(27		)	551,497			(110,828		)	549,285
Total liabilities	210,712			2,561			592,423			(134,195		)	671,501
Stockholders’ equity:
Common stock	209,346						61			(209,346		)	61
Capital in excess of par value	249,152						637,547			(249,152		)	637,547
Retained earnings (accumulated deficit)	(221,597		)	12,327			(371,591		)				(580,861		)
Other				(11		)							(11		)
Total stockholders’ equity	236,901			12,316			266,017			(458,498		)	56,736
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	447,613		$	14,877		$	858,440		$	(592,693	)	$	728,237

23

HEADWATERS INCORPORATED

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

June 30, 2012

(Unaudited)

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING BALANCE SHEET — June 30, 2012

	Guarantor			Non- guarantor		Parent			Eliminationsand			Headwaters
(in thousands)	Subsidiaries			Subsidiaries		Company			Reclassifications			Consolidated
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	19,284		$	—	$	9,692		$	—		$	28,976
Trade receivables, net	91,494											91,494
Inventories	32,331											32,331
Current and deferred income taxes	13,790					8,887			(20,823		)	1,854
Assets held for sale	6,835											6,835
Other	7,084					3,074						10,158
Total current assets	170,818			—		21,653			(20,823		)	171,648
Property, plant and equipment, net	158,393			—		1,072			—			159,465
Other assets:
Intangible assets, net	148,832											148,832
Goodwill	116,671											116,671
Assets held for sale	7,812											7,812
Investments in subsidiaries and intercompany accounts	378,377			9,023		71,098			(458,498		)	—
Intercompany notes	(637,046		)			637,046						—
Deferred income taxes	81,672					22,514			(104,186		)	—
Other	18,871					22,519						41,390
Total other assets	115,189			9,023		753,177			(562,684		)	314,705
Total assets	$	444,400		$	9,023	$	775,902		$	(583,507	)	$	645,818
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable	$	16,308		$	—	$	1,122		$	—		$	17,430
Accrued personnel costs	10,322					20,622						30,944
Accrued interest						8,592						8,592
Current and deferred income taxes	15,461			3,285		4,616			(20,823		)	2,539
Liabilities held for sale	7,202											7,202
Other accrued liabilities	41,693					1,859						43,552
Total current liabilities	90,986			3,285		36,811			(20,823		)	110,259
Long-term liabilities:
Long-term debt						503,062						503,062
Deferred income taxes	89,087					19,343			(104,186		)	4,244
Unrecognized income tax benefits	5,101			10		3,611						8,722
Liabilities held for sale	8,545											8,545
Other	3,993					5,725						9,718
Total long-term liabilities	106,726			10		531,741			(104,186		)	534,291
Total liabilities	197,712			3,295		568,552			(125,009		)	644,550
Stockholders’ equity:
Common stock	213,158					61			(213,158		)	61
Capital in excess of par value	245,340					639,474			(245,340		)	639,474
Retained earnings (accumulated deficit)	(211,810		)	5,728		(432,121		)				(638,203		)
Other						(64		)				(64		)
Total stockholders’ equity	246,688			5,728		207,350			(458,498		)	1,268
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	444,400		$	9,023	$	775,902		$	(583,507	)	$	645,818

24

HEADWATERS INCORPORATED

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

June 30, 2012

(Unaudited)

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS

Three Months Ended June 30, 2011

	Guarantor			Non-guarantor		Parent			Headwaters
(in thousands)	Subsidiaries			Subsidiaries		Company			Consolidated
Revenue:
Light building products	$	91,635		$	—	$	—		$	91,635
Heavy construction materials	62,435								62,435
Energy technology	6,587								6,587
Total revenue	160,657			—		—			160,657
Cost of revenue:
Light building products	66,177								66,177
Heavy construction materials	47,234								47,234
Energy technology	3,258								3,258
Total cost of revenue	116,669			—		—			116,669
Gross profit	43,988			—		—			43,988
Operating expenses:
Amortization	5,673								5,673
Research and development	1,358								1,358
Selling, general and administrative	21,446					1,553			22,999
Restructuring costs	393								393
Total operating expenses	28,870			—		1,553			30,423
Operating income (loss)	15,118			—		(1,553		)	13,565
Other income (expense):
Net interest expense	9					(13,346		)	(13,337		)
Other, net				1,703					1,703
Total other income (expense), net	9			1,703		(13,346		)	(11,634		)
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes	15,127			1,703		(14,899		)	1,931
Income tax benefit (provision)	267			20		(187		)	100
Income (loss) from continuing operations	15,394			1,723		(15,086		)	2,031
Loss from discontinued operations, net of income taxes	(8,379		)						(8,379		)
Net income (loss)	$	7,015		$	1,723	$	(15,086	)	$	(6,348	)

25

HEADWATERS INCORPORATED

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

June 30, 2012

(Unaudited)

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS

Three Months Ended June 30, 2012

	Guarantor			Non-guarantor		Parent			Headwaters
(in thousands)	Subsidiaries			Subsidiaries		Company			Consolidated
Revenue:
Light building products	$	97,164		$	—	$	—		$	97,164
Heavy construction materials	74,728								74,728
Energy technology	3,729								3,729
Total revenue	175,621			—		—			175,621
Cost of revenue:
Light building products	66,558								66,558
Heavy construction materials	54,863								54,863
Energy technology	1,842								1,842
Total cost of revenue	123,263			—		—			123,263
Gross profit	52,358			—		—			52,358
Operating expenses:
Amortization	4,936								4,936
Research and development	2,280								2,280
Selling, general and administrative	22,539					6,673			29,212
Total operating expenses	29,755			—		6,673			36,428
Operating income (loss)	22,603			—		(6,673		)	15,930
Other income (expense):
Net interest expense	(25		)			(15,950		)	(15,975		)
Other, net	(268		)			325			57
Total other income (expense), net	(293		)	—		(15,625		)	(15,918		)
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes	22,310			—		(22,298		)	12
Income tax benefit (provision)	2,225			236		(431		)	2,030
Income (loss) from continuing operations	24,535			236		(22,729		)	2,042
Loss from discontinued operations, net of income taxes	(15,078		)						(15,078		)
Net income (loss)	$	9,457		$	236	$	(22,729	)	$	(13,036	)

26

HEADWATERS INCORPORATED

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

June 30, 2012

(Unaudited)

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS

Nine Months Ended June 30, 2011

	Guarantor			Non-guarantor		Parent			Headwaters
(in thousands)	Subsidiaries			Subsidiaries		Company			Consolidated
Revenue:
Light building products	$	224,021		$	—	$	—		$	224,021
Heavy construction materials	170,746								170,746
Energy technology	14,914								14,914
Total revenue	409,681			—		—			409,681
Cost of revenue:
Light building products	171,961								171,961
Heavy construction materials	133,095								133,095
Energy technology	7,731								7,731
Total cost of revenue	312,787			—		—			312,787
Gross profit	96,894			—		—			96,894
Operating expenses:
Amortization	16,826								16,826
Research and development	4,948								4,948
Selling, general and administrative	77,956					10,349			88,305
Restructuring costs	5,212					980			6,192
Total operating expenses	104,942			—		11,329			116,271
Operating loss	(8,048		)	—		(11,329		)	(19,377		)
Other income (expense):
Net interest expense	15					(112,842		)	(112,827		)
Other, net	371			4,154					4,525
Total other income (expense), net	386			4,154		(112,842		)	(108,302		)
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes	(7,662		)	4,154		(124,171		)	(127,679		)
Income tax benefit (provision)	(113		)	61		(2,868		)	(2,920		)
Income (loss) from continuing operations	(7,775		)	4,215		(127,039		)	(130,599		)
Loss from discontinued operations, net of income taxes	(52,590		)						(52,590		)
Net income (loss)	$	(60,365	)	$	4,215	$	(127,039	)	$	(183,189	)

27

HEADWATERS INCORPORATED

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

June 30, 2012

(Unaudited)

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS

Nine Months Ended June 30, 2012

	Guarantor			Non-guarantor			Parent			Headwaters
(in thousands)	Subsidiaries			Subsidiaries			Company			Consolidated
Revenue:
Light building products	$	244,809		$	—		$	—		$	244,809
Heavy construction materials	189,105									189,105
Energy technology	8,766									8,766
Total revenue	442,680			—			—			442,680
Cost of revenue:
Light building products	176,501									176,501
Heavy construction materials	143,341									143,341
Energy technology	4,473									4,473
Total cost of revenue	324,315			—			—			324,315
Gross profit	118,365			—			—			118,365
Operating expenses:
Amortization	15,739									15,739
Research and development	5,750									5,750
Selling, general and administrative	60,330						15,856			76,186
Restructuring costs	2,145									2,145
Total operating expenses	83,964			—			15,856			99,820
Operating income (loss)	34,401			—			(15,856		)	18,545
Other income (expense):
Net interest expense	(62		)				(41,896		)	(41,958		)
Other, net	(711		)	(5,892		)	2,350			(4,253		)
Total other income (expense), net	(773		)	(5,892		)	(39,546		)	(46,211		)
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes	33,628			(5,892		)	(55,402		)	(27,666		)
Income tax benefit (provision)	4,035			(707		)	(5,128		)	(1,800		)
Income (loss) from continuing operations	37,663			(6,599		)	(60,530		)	(29,466		)
Loss from discontinued operations, net of income taxes	(27,876		)							(27,876		)
Net income (loss)	$	9,787		$	(6,599	)	$	(60,530	)	$	(57,342	)

28

HEADWATERS INCORPORATED

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

June 30, 2012

(Unaudited)

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS

Nine Months Ended June 30, 2011

	Guarantor			Non-guarantor			Parent			Headwaters
(in thousands)	Subsidiaries			Subsidiaries			Company			Consolidated
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income (loss)	$	(60,365	)	$	4,215		$	(127,039	)	$	(183,189	)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash providedby (used in) operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization	47,959						72			48,031
Asset impairments and non-cash restructuring costs	39,210						980			40,190
Interest expense related to amortization of debt issue costsand debt discount							17,111			17,111
Stock-based compensation	1,708						1,276			2,984
Deferred income taxes	(8,826		)	174			8,795			143
Net gain of unconsolidated joint ventures				(4,155		)				(4,155		)
Net gain on disposition of property, plant and equipment	(304		)							(304		)
Decrease in trade receivables	1,235									1,235
Decrease in inventories	1,490									1,490
Increase (decrease) in accounts payable and accrued liabilities	7,074						(7,548		)	(474		)
Other changes in operating assets and liabilities, net	(12,746		)	(48		)	2,760			(10,034		)
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities	16,435			186			(103,593		)	(86,972		)
Cash flows from investing activities:
Purchase of property, plant and equipment and payments foracquisitions	(19,788		)							(19,788		)
Proceeds from disposition of property, plant and equipment	420									420
Net decrease in long-term receivables and deposits	510									510
Net change in other assets	(784		)	(186		)	(119		)	(1,089		)
Net cash used in investing activities	(19,642		)	(186		)	(119		)	(19,947		)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Net proceeds from issuance of long-term debt							392,750			392,750
Payments on long-term debt							(342,509		)	(342,509		)
Employee stock purchases	417						129			546
Net cash provided by financing activities	417			—			50,370			50,787
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents	(2,790		)	0			(53,342		)	(56,132		)
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period	21,168			0			69,816			90,984
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period	$	18,378		$	0		$	16,474		$	34,852

29

HEADWATERS INCORPORATED

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

June 30, 2012

(Unaudited)

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS

Nine Months Ended June 30, 2012

	Guarantor			Non-guarantor			Parent			Headwaters
(in thousands)	Subsidiaries			Subsidiaries			Company			Consolidated
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income (loss)	$	9,787		$	(6,599	)	$	(60,530	)	$	(57,342	)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization	38,661						103			38,764
Asset impairments and non-cash restructuring costs	13,602									13,602
Interest expense related to amortization of debt issue costs and debt discount							12,687			12,687
Stock-based compensation	572						807			1,379
Deferred income taxes	55			27						82
Net loss of unconsolidated joint ventures				6,069						6,069
Net gain on disposition of property, plant and equipment	(902		)							(902		)
Gain on convertible debt repayments							(2,350		)	(2,350		)
Increase in trade receivables	(1,190		)							(1,190		)
Decrease in inventories	2,983									2,983
Decrease in accounts payable and accrued liabilities	(4,739		)				(919		)	(5,658		)
Other changes in operating assets and liabilities, net	(56,656		)	(18,019		)	78,525			3,850
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities	2,173			(18,522		)	28,323			11,974
Cash flows from investing activities:
Purchase of property, plant and equipment and payments for acquisitions	(18,350		)				(855		)	(19,205		)
Proceeds from disposition of property, plant and equipment	1,336									1,336
Proceeds from sale of interests in joint ventures				18,522						18,522
Net decrease (increase) in long-term receivables and deposits	(2,076		)				1,977			(99		)
Net change in other assets	(270		)				(605		)	(875		)
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities	(19,360		)	18,522			517			(321		)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Payments on long-term debt							(32,931		)	(32,931		)
Debt issue costs							(1,040		)	(1,040		)
Employee stock purchases	349						135			484
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities	349			—			(33,836		)	(33,487		)
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents	(16,838		)	0			(4,996		)	(21,834		)
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period	36,122			0			14,688			50,810
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period	$	19,284		$	0		$	9,692		$	28,976

30

ITEM 2.MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the interim condensed consolidated financial statements and related notes included in this Form 10-Q. Our fiscal year ends on September 30 and unless otherwise noted, references to 2011 refer to our fiscal quarter and / or nine months ended June 30, 2011 and references to 2012 refer to our fiscal quarter and / or nine months ended June 30, 2012. Other references to years refer to our fiscal year rather than a calendar year.

Overview

Consolidation and Segments.  The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Headwaters, all of our subsidiaries, and other entities in which we have a controlling interest. All significant intercompany transactions and accounts are eliminated in consolidation.

We currently operate primarily in two construction-oriented industries: light building products and heavy construction materials. Our third non-core operating segment is in energy technology. In the light building products segment, we design, manufacture, and sell manufactured architectural stone, exterior siding accessories (such as shutters, mounting blocks, and vents), concrete block and other building products. Revenues consist of product sales to wholesale and retail distributors, contractors and other users of building products. Revenues in the heavy construction materials segment consist primarily of CCP product sales, including fly ash used as an admixture in concrete, along with a smaller amount from services provided to utilities relating to the disposal of CCPs. In the energy technology segment, we are focused on reducing waste and increasing the value of energy-related feedstocks, primarily in the areas of low-value coal and oil. In the past, revenues for the energy technology segment have consisted primarily of coal sales; however, in September 2011 we committed to a plan to sell our coal cleaning facilities and since then the coal cleaning business has been presented as a discontinued operation. Currently, continuing revenues for the energy technology segment consist primarily of catalyst sales to oil refineries.

Operations and Strategy.  During the past ten years, we have executed our two-fold plan of maximizing cash flow from our existing operating business units and diversifying away from our historical reliance on energy technology businesses. Our past acquisition strategy targeted businesses that were leading companies in their respective industries and that had strong operating margins, thus providing additional cash flow that complemented the financial performance of our existing businesses. With the addition and expansion of our CCP management and marketing business through acquisitions beginning in 2002, and the growth of our light building products business through several acquisitions beginning in 2004, we achieved revenue growth and diversification in three business segments. In 2005 and subsequent years, we focused on the integration of our large 2004 acquisitions, including the marketing of diverse kinds of building products through our national distribution network. In 2006, we began to acquire small companies in the light building products industry with innovative products that could be marketed using the distribution channels we developed over many years.

During 2008 and 2009, we developed the coal cleaning business in the energy technology segment, which is now classified as a discontinued operation. As the economy deteriorated beginning in late 2008, we focused on operational efficiency improvements and cost reductions, particularly in the light building products and heavy construction materials segments, in order to strengthen our balance sheet. The emphasis on cost reductions culminated in a restructuring effort initiated in fiscal 2011 and completed in March 2012, but cost control remains an area of ongoing focus.

Light Building Products Segment.  Our light building products segment has been significantly affected by the depressed new housing and residential remodeling markets. Accordingly, we have significantly reduced operating costs to be positively positioned to take advantage of a sustained industry turnaround when it occurs.

A severe decline in new housing starts and in home sales generally began in 2007 and continues to the present. Bank foreclosures have put a large number of homes into the market for sale, effectively limiting some of the incentives to build new homes. During calendar 2011, the homebuilding industry continued to experience soft demand for new homes and an oversupply of new and existing homes available for sale. In addition to new construction, our light building products business also relies on the home improvement and remodeling markets. Limits on credit availability, further home foreclosures, home price depreciation, and an oversupply of homes for sale in the market may adversely affect homeowners’ and/or homebuilders’ ability or desire to engage in construction or remodeling, resulting in an extended period of low new construction starts and reduced remodeling and repair activities.

We, like many others in the light building products industry, experienced a large drop in orders and a reduction in our margins in 2008 and 2009 relative to prior years. In 2007, 2008 and 2009, we recorded significant goodwill impairments associated with our light building products business, although none of those impairment charges affected our cash position,

31

cash flow from operating activities or debt covenant compliance. Weakness continued in fiscal 2010 and 2011 and still exists, although there are nascent signs of a possible market stabilization occurring in many areas of the country. It is not possible to know when improved market conditions and a housing recovery will become sustainable and we can provide no assurances that the light building products market will improve in the near future.

While mortgage and home equity loan interest rates have decreased, volatility continues to exist in credit and equity markets, increased borrowing requirements prevent many potential buyers from qualifying for home mortgages and equity loans and there exists a continued lack of consumer confidence. Continued tightness of mortgage lending or mortgage financing requirements could adversely affect the availability of credit for purchasers of our products and thereby reduce our sales. There could be a number of follow-on effects from the credit crisis on our business, including the inability of prospective homebuyers or remodelers to obtain credit for financing the purchase of our building products. These and other similar factors could continue to cause decisions to delay or forego new home construction or improvement projects, cause our customers to delay or decide not to purchase our building products, or lead to a decline in customer transactions and our financial performance.

Heavy Construction Materials Segment.  Our business strategy in the heavy construction materials industry is to negotiate long-term contracts with suppliers, supported by investment in transportation and storage infrastructure for the marketing and sale of CCPs. Demand for CCPs is somewhat dependent on federal and state funding of infrastructure projects, which has decreased in recent years as compared to earlier periods. We are continuing our efforts to expand the demand for high-quality CCPs, develop more uses for lower-quality CCPs, and expand our CCP disposal services and site service revenue generated from CCP management. While all of our businesses have been affected by the current recession, the impact on our heavy construction materials segment has been somewhat less severe than on our light building products segment.

Energy Technology Segment.  We own and operate coal cleaning facilities that remove impurities from waste coal, resulting in higher-value, marketable coal. In fiscal 2011, we assessed the strategic fit of our various operations and decided to divest of certain businesses in the energy technology segment which do not align with our long-term strategy. In September 2011, the Board of Directors committed to a plan to sell the coal cleaning business and we currently expect to sell all, or substantially all, of the remaining business before the end of calendar 2012.

During fiscal 2010, 2011 and 2012, many of our coal cleaning assets were idled or produced coal at low levels of capacity and were cash flow negative for these or other reasons. As a result, we recorded coal cleaning asset impairments in those years, including an impairment charge in 2012, to reduce the carrying value of the assets to fair value less estimated selling costs. Management used its best efforts to reasonably estimate all of the inputs in the cash flow models utilized to calculate the impairment charges; however, materially different input estimates and assumptions, including the probabilities of differing potential outcomes, would necessarily result in materially different calculations of expected future cash flows and asset fair values and materially different impairment estimates.

Currently, continuing revenues for the energy technology segment consist primarily of catalyst sales. In fiscal 2011, we announced the decision by a refinery to commercially implement our HCAT® technology following a lengthy evaluation of the technology and we currently expect to have additional HCAT® customers in future years. We continue to invest in research and development activities focused on energy-related technologies and nanotechnology, but at decreased levels compared to earlier years. Through December 31, 2011, we participated in a joint venture that operates an ethanol plant located in North Dakota. We sold our interest in that joint venture effective January 1, 2012. We also participated in a joint venture that owns a hydrogen peroxide plant in South Korea, but we sold our interest in that joint venture in fiscal 2010.

Seasonality and Weather.  Both our light building products and our heavy construction materials segments are greatly impacted by seasonality. Revenues, profitability and EBITDA are generally highest in the June and September quarters. Further, both segments are affected by weather to the extent it impacts construction activities.

Debt and Liquidity.  We became highly leveraged as a result of acquisitions, but reduced our outstanding debt significantly through 2008 by using cash generated from operations, from underwritten public offerings of common stock and from proceeds from settlement of litigation. During 2005 through 2008, we made several early repayments of our long-term debt, but in subsequent years early repayments of long-term debt decreased, primarily due to our investments of available cash in the development of our coal cleaning business.

In fiscal 2010, we issued 11-3/8% senior secured notes for net proceeds of approximately $316.2 million. We used approximately $260.0 million of the proceeds to repay all of our obligations under the former senior secured credit facility and our outstanding 2.875% convertible senior subordinated notes. We also entered into a $70.0 million asset based revolving loan facility (ABL Revolver) which is currently undrawn. During fiscal 2010 and 2011, we repaid most of our 16% convertible senior subordinated notes and a large portion of our 14.75% convertible senior subordinated notes, largely with

32

proceeds from the sale of our interest in the South Korean hydrogen peroxide joint venture and a 2010 federal income tax refund. In March 2011, we again restructured our long-term debt by issuing $400.0 million of 7-5/8% senior secured notes for net proceeds of approximately $392.8 million. We used most of those net proceeds to repay the 11-3/8% senior secured notes issued in fiscal 2010 and the related early repayment premium of approximately $59.0 million. The 7-5/8% senior secured notes mature in April 2019 while the 11-3/8% notes were scheduled to mature in 2014. During fiscal 2012, we have continued to repurchase our convertible senior subordinated notes and we also issued approximately $49.8 million of new 8.75% convertible senior subordinated notes due in February 2016, in exchange for cancellation of an equal amount of outstanding 2.50 notes due in February 2014.

Capital expenditures in fiscal 2010 and 2011 were significantly lower than in prior years and this trend continues in fiscal 2012. This has allowed us to focus on liquidity and the early repayment of debt and has enabled us to continue implementing our overall operational strategy. We currently have approximately $29.0 million of cash on hand and total liquidity of approximately $80.1 million. Additional cash flow is expected to be generated from operations over the next 12 months.

In summary, our strategy for fiscal 2012 and subsequent years is to continue capital expenditures at reduced levels, continue activities to improve operational efficiencies and reduce operating costs, and to reduce our outstanding debt levels to the extent possible using cash on hand, cash flow from operations and cash from the sale of non-core assets. We also may review strategic acquisitions of products or entities that expand our current operating platform when opportunities arise.

Three Months Ended June 30, 2012 Compared to Three Months Ended June 30, 2011

The information set forth below compares our operating results for the three months ended June 30, 2012 (2012) with operating results for the three months ended June 30, 2011 (2011). Except as noted, the references to captions in the statements of operations refer to continuing operations only.

Summary.  Our total revenue for 2012 was $175.6 million, up 9% from $160.7 million for 2011. Gross profit increased 19%, from $44.0 million in 2011 to $52.4 million in 2012. Our 2012 operating income was $15.9 million compared to operating income of $13.6 million in 2011, and income from continuing operations for both 2012 and 2011 was $2.0 million, or $0.04 per diluted share in 2011 and $0.03 per diluted share in 2012. Our net loss including discontinued operations increased from $(6.3) million, or a diluted loss per share of $(0.10), in 2011, to a net loss of $(13.0) million, or $(0.21) per diluted share, in 2012.

Revenue and Gross Margins.  The major components of revenue, along with gross margins, are discussed in the sections below, by segment.

Light Building Products Segment.  Sales of light building products in 2012 were $97.2 million with a corresponding gross profit of $30.6 million. Sales of light building products in 2011 were $91.6 million with a corresponding gross profit of $25.5 million. We experienced growth in our siding group primarily from new product offerings, but also from improved end markets. Growth in architectural stone was driven by increased market share and improved end domestic markets. Revenue in siding and stone benefited from both price and volume increases. Revenue in our concrete block product group declined because of slower school construction in the Texas market, although we are starting to see some increases in sales from new products and retail channel sales. In fiscal 2011, we implemented a major restructuring initiative which positively impacted the gross margin. We continue to focus on cost reduction measures, resulting in improved efficiencies and better economic performance.

The significant weakness in the new housing and residential remodeling markets which began several years ago appears to be stabilizing somewhat in 2012. We believe our niche strategy and our focus on productivity improvements and cost reductions have tempered somewhat the impact of the severe slowdown in the housing market; however, the recession has resulted in high unemployment, adding to the high level of home foreclosures, putting additional homes on the market and further reducing the demand for new construction.

According to the National Association of Home Builders, the most current 10- and 50-year averages for new housing starts were 1.3 million and 1.5 million units, respectively. New housing starts were 0.6 million units in both calendar 2010 and 2011. Further, during the last 50 years, the four years with the lowest number of housing starts were 2008, 2009, 2010 and 2011. As of June 2012, the seasonally adjusted annual number of new housing starts was 0.8 million units. Our light building products business relies on the home improvement and remodeling market as well as new construction. The U.S. Census Bureau’s Value of Private Residential Construction Spending Put in Place data on homeowner improvement activity shows that the four-quarter moving average peaked at $146.2 billion in the second quarter of calendar 2007, fell to a subsequent low of $110.7 billion in the first quarter of calendar 2011, then rose to $114.8 billion in the first quarter of calendar 2012, the latest quarter for which actual data is available. The Leading Indicator of Remodeling Activity estimate issued by the Joint Center for Housing Studies at Harvard University is that the four-quarter moving average will be $128.9 billion in the first quarter of calendar 2013.

33

Given our market leadership positions and reduced cost structure, we believe that we are positioned to benefit from a sustained recovery in the housing market when it occurs. We believe the long-term growth prospects in the industry are strong because the current seasonally-adjusted annualized housing starts are still well below the 10- and 50-year averages. According to a 2009 report by the Harvard Joint Center for Housing Studies, the nation’s housing stock would need to accommodate approximately 12.5 million to 14.8 million additional households due to population growth over the subsequent decade, or approximately 1.3 million to 1.5 million households per year.

Heavy Construction Materials Segment.  Heavy construction materials revenues for 2012 were $74.7 million with a corresponding gross profit of $19.9 million. Heavy construction materials revenues for 2011 were $62.4 million with a corresponding gross profit of $15.2 million. We experienced revenue growth in both CCP sales and in CCP services provided to utilities, but certain utilities experienced unplanned outages and lower electricity demand, reducing overall service activities from expected levels. We continued to experience year-over-year growth in product shipments and we were awarded two new CCP management contracts during the quarter. We anticipate that the record high temperatures will have a positive impact on coal consumption, increasing service revenue over the next several months. The improvement in gross margin was primarily the result of improved product sales, product mix and our continuous improvement efforts to lower costs.

It is not possible to accurately predict the future trends of either cement consumption or cement prices, nor the correlation between cement usage and prices and fly ash sales and prices. Nevertheless, because fly ash is sold as a replacement for portland cement in a wide variety of concrete uses—including infrastructure, commercial, and residential construction—statistics and trends for portland and blended cement sales can be an indicator for fly ash sales. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, the Producer Price Index for cement declined 1.5% from September 2010 to September 2011. According to the Portland Cement Association (PCA), cement consumption increased approximately 3.0% in calendar 2011. In April 2012, the PCA’s cement consumption forecast reflected the following increases for calendar 2012 through 2016:

Year ending December 31:	(percent increase)
2012	3.7	%
2013	7.4	%
2014	13.8	%
2015	11.7	%
2016	8.3	%

Low natural gas prices and EPA regulations have combined to force the shutdown of several coal combustion power plants, negatively impacting the supply of CCPs for beneficial use. However, we have multiple sources of supply and a broad distribution system, which allows us to backfill CCPs in locations where power plants have closed, creating an opportunity for potential growth.

In June 2010, the EPA proposed two alternative rules to regulate CCPs generated by electric utilities and independent power producers. One proposed option would classify CCPs disposed of in surface impoundments or landfills as “special wastes” subject to federal hazardous waste regulation under Subtitle C of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). The second proposed option would instead regulate CCPs as non-hazardous waste under Subtitle D of RCRA, with states retaining the lead authority on regulating their handling, storage and disposal. Under both options, the current exemption from hazardous waste regulation for CCPs that are used for beneficial purposes would remain in effect. However, the EPA has received comments on refining the definition of beneficial uses subject to the exemption, which could result in a narrowing of the scope of exempt uses in the final rule to certain encapsulated uses. Both rule options are controversial.

On April 18, 2012 the House of Representatives passed a short-term extension of existing transportation funding, creating an opportunity to hold a conference with the Senate, which had previously passed a new transportation bill. The House added its fly ash bill (H.R. 2273) to the short-term transportation extension, resulting in fly ash disposal legislation also moving to conference with the Senate. However, the fly ash language was not added to the final transportation bill. We are seeking another vehicle to which we can attach the language. Importantly, we have gained significant bipartisan Senate support for a legislative solution to the issues surrounding fly ash disposal.

To date, there has been minimal activity in the environmental litigation associated with fly ash disposal. We do not anticipate any decision in the litigation in 2012.

Finally, the EPA has not completed its risk evaluation of encapsulated beneficial use of fly ash. When the risk evaluation is complete, we believe that the EPA may apply the risk evaluation methodology to concrete and wall board, two examples of encapsulated products, confirming the historical consensus that there is no environmental exposure associated with the use of fly ash as a partial replacement for portland cement in concrete.

34

At this time, it is not possible to predict the form that potential legislation or final regulations will take. Either of the proposed options proposed by the EPA is likely to increase the complexity and cost of managing and disposing of CCPs. If the EPA decides to regulate CCPs as hazardous waste under RCRA Subtitle C, CCPs would become subject to a variety of regulations. Regulation of CCPs as hazardous waste would likely have an adverse effect on beneficial use and sales of CCPs and our relationships with utilities. There can be no guarantee that such regulations would not reduce fly ash supplies or our ability to market fly ash and other CCPs for certain uses, which would have a material adverse effect on our operations and financial condition.

Energy Technology Segment.  Energy technology segment revenues for 2012 were $3.7 million with a corresponding gross profit of $1.9 million. Revenues for 2011 were $6.6 million with a corresponding gross profit of $3.3 million. Following the decision to sell the coal cleaning business and the sale of our interest in the Blue Flint ethanol plant, our energy technology segment currently consists primarily of operations related to our heavy oil upgrading catalyst. Catalyst sales in 2012 were lower than in 2011 primarily due to reduced usage at one of our customer facilities and the timing of shipments.

Operating Expenses, including Restructuring Costs.  Amortization of intangible assets decreased in 2012 from 2011 due to assets that have been fully amortized. Research and development expenses increased approximately $0.9 million from 2011 to 2012, primarily due to changes in long-term incentive compensation expense tied in part to changes in our stock price. The stock price increased during the June 2012 quarter, but decreased during the June 2011 quarter. Selling, general and administrative expenses increased approximately $6.2 million, from $23.0 million in 2011 to $29.2 million in 2012. The increase was primarily attributable to increased incentive compensation in 2012, due to compensation tied to improved performance and changes in our stock price. We normally record the majority of our incentive compensation in the third and fourth quarters of our fiscal year due to the seasonality of our business.

In 2011, we recorded $0.4 million of restructuring costs as a result of actions taken in fiscal 2011 to lower operating costs and improve operational efficiency, primarily in the light building products segment. The charges consisted primarily of workforce reductions and related severance expenses as described in more detail in Note 11 to the consolidated financial statements. The restructuring was initiated in fiscal 2011 primarily due to the depressed new housing and residential remodeling markets. This restructuring effort was completed in the March 2012 quarter and no additional restructuring costs related to the 2011 actions have been incurred since that time.

Other Income and Expense.  For 2012, we reported net other expense of $15.9 million, compared to net other expense of $11.6 million for 2011. The increase of $4.3 million was comprised of an increase in net interest expense of approximately $2.7 million and a decrease in net other income of approximately $1.6 million.

Net interest expense increased from $13.3 million in 2011 to $16.0 million in 2012 due primarily to accelerated debt discount and debt issue cost amortization of approximately $5.2 million related to the 2012 early retirements of our convertible senior subordinated debt, described in detail in Note 6 to the consolidated financial statements. In 2011, there was only $1.3 million of interest expense related to early retirements of debt. Partially offsetting the increase in accelerated debt discount and debt issue cost amortization in 2012 was reduced interest expense on lower balances of outstanding long-term debt in 2012, due to early repayments of debt during the 12 months ended June 30, 2012. Based on current balances of outstanding long-term debt and assuming there are no additional early retirements of debt during the September 2012 quarter, interest expense in fiscal 2012 is currently expected to total approximately $53.0 million.

The decrease in net other income of $1.6 million was primarily the result of approximately $1.7 million of income in 2011 related to our equity interest in the Blue Flint joint venture which was sold effective January 1, 2012.

Income Tax Provision.  Reference is made to Note 8 to the consolidated financial statements for a detailed description of the negative estimated effective income tax rates used to record the income tax benefit in 2011 and 2012, including the reasons for recording a full valuation allowance on net operating losses, tax credits and other deferred tax assets in both periods. We currently expect to record a full valuation allowance on our net amortizable deferred tax assets until some point in time after our return to profitability.

Discontinued Operations.  Coal sales of $6.6 million in 2012 were lower than sales of $9.9 million in 2011 due primarily to a curtailment of operations pending the sale of the coal cleaning assets. Due to low capacity utilization, idled facilities and feedstock issues, the cost of revenue and operating expenses for the coal cleaning business exceeded revenues in both periods. In addition, we recorded a $13.0 million impairment of the coal cleaning assets in 2012. We sold one coal cleaning facility in 2012 and currently expect to sell all, or substantially all, of the remaining business before the end of calendar 2012. The pressure put on coal by low natural gas prices and the EPA has increased the difficulty of concluding a transaction. It is currently expected that some losses will be incurred in operating and maintaining the coal cleaning facilities

35

until such time as they are sold; however, it is not currently possible to know when the facilities will be sold, or what the losses might be until that time.

Nine Months Ended June 30, 2012 Compared to Nine Months Ended June 30, 2011

The information set forth below compares our operating results for the nine months ended June 30, 2012 (2012) with operating results for the nine months ended June 30, 2011 (2011). Except as noted, the references to captions in the statements of operations refer to continuing operations only.

Summary.  Our total revenue for 2012 was $442.7 million, up 8% from $409.7 million for 2011. Gross profit increased 22%, from $96.9 million in 2011 to $118.4 million in 2012. Our 2012 operating income was $18.5 million compared to an operating loss of $(19.4) million in 2011, and the loss from continuing operations decreased to $(29.5) million, or $(0.48) per diluted share, from $(130.6) million, or $(2.16) per diluted share, in 2011. Our net loss including discontinued operations decreased from $(183.2) million, or a diluted loss per share of $(3.03), in 2011, to a net loss of $(57.3) million, or $(0.94) per diluted share, in 2012. There were several significant non-routine adjustments recorded in 2011, in the March 2011 quarter, including approximately $68.9 million of interest expense related to our senior debt refinancing (of which approximately $59.0 million was for the early repayment premium relating to the repurchase of our 11-3/8% senior secured notes), $37.0 million of coal cleaning asset impairments, and $15.0 million of accrued legal costs related to a judgment in an ongoing legal matter. These adjustments and others are discussed in more detail below.

Revenue and Gross Margins.  The major components of revenue, along with gross margins, are discussed in the sections below, by segment.

Light Building Products Segment.  Sales of light building products in 2012 were $244.8 million with a corresponding gross profit of $68.3 million. Sales of light building products in 2011 were $224.0 million with a corresponding gross profit of $52.1 million. We experienced growth in our siding group primarily from new product offerings, but also from improved end markets. Growth in architectural stone was driven by increased market share and improved end domestic markets. Revenue in siding and stone benefited from both price and volume increases. Revenue in our concrete block product group declined primarily because of slower school construction in the Texas market. In fiscal 2011, we implemented a major restructuring initiative which positively impacted the gross margin. We continue to focus on cost reduction measures, resulting in improved efficiencies and better economic performance.

Heavy Construction Materials Segment.  Heavy construction materials revenues for 2012 were $189.1 million with a corresponding gross profit of $45.8 million. Heavy construction materials revenues for 2011 were $170.7 million with a corresponding gross profit of $37.7 million. We experienced revenue growth in both CCP sales and in CCP services provided to utilities. The improvement in gross margin was primarily the result of improved product sales, product mix and our continuous improvement efforts to lower costs.

Energy Technology Segment.  Energy technology segment revenues for 2012 were $8.8 million with a corresponding gross profit of $4.3 million. Revenues for 2011 were $14.9 million with a corresponding gross profit of $7.2 million. Catalyst sales in 2012 were lower than in 2011 primarily due to reduced usage at one of our customer facilities and the timing of shipments.

Operating Expenses, including Restructuring Costs.  Amortization of intangible assets decreased in 2012 from 2011 due to assets that have been fully amortized. Research and development expenses increased approximately $0.8 million from 2011 to 2012, primarily due to changes in long-term incentive compensation expense tied in part to changes in our stock price. The stock price increased during 2012, but decreased during 2011. Selling, general and administrative expenses decreased approximately $12.1 million, from $88.3 million in 2011 to $76.2 million in 2012. The decrease was primarily attributable to $15.0 million of litigation expense recognized in 2011, as described in Note 12 to the consolidated financial statements, and cost reductions initiated in late fiscal 2011, partially offset by increased incentive compensation in 2012 (due to compensation tied to improved performance and changes in our stock price).

In 2011 and 2012, we recorded $6.2 million and $2.1 million, respectively, of restructuring costs as a result of actions taken in fiscal 2011 to lower operating costs and improve operational efficiency, primarily in the light building products segment, all as described in Note 11 to the consolidated financial statements.

Other Income and Expense.  For 2012, we reported net other expense of $46.2 million, compared to net other expense of $108.3 million for 2011. The decrease of $62.1 million was comprised of a decrease in net interest expense of approximately $70.9 million and a decrease in net other income / increase in net other expense of approximately $8.8 million.

Net interest expense decreased from $112.8 million in 2011 to $41.9 million in 2012 due primarily to approximately $59.0 million of premium relating to the 2011 early retirement of our 11-3/8% senior secured notes plus approximately $8.8

36

million of accelerated debt discount and debt issue costs associated with that early repayment, along with approximately $3.0 million of reduced interest expense from the lower-rate senior debt outstanding in 2012 as compared to the higher-rate senior debt outstanding for most of 2011.

The decrease in net other income / increase in net other expense of $8.8 million was primarily the result of approximately $4.2 million of income in 2011 related to our equity interest in the Blue Flint joint venture compared to approximately $6.4 of expense in 2012 (including a loss on sale of approximately $6.2 million), partially offset by a gain of $2.3 million from the early repayments of convertible debt in 2012.

Income Tax Provision.  Reference is made to Note 8 to the consolidated financial statements for a detailed description of the negative estimated effective income tax rates used to record income tax expense in 2011 and 2012, including the reasons for recording a full valuation allowance on net operating losses, tax credits and other deferred tax assets in both periods.

Discontinued Operations.  Coal sales of $16.4 million in 2012 were lower than sales of $40.3 million in 2011 due primarily to a curtailment of operations pending the sale of the coal cleaning assets. Due to low capacity utilization, idled facilities and feedstock issues, the cost of revenue and operating expenses for the coal cleaning business exceeded revenues in both periods. In addition, we recorded a $37.0 million impairment of the coal cleaning assets in 2011 and a $13.0 million impairment in 2012.

Impact of Inflation and Related Matters

In certain periods, some of our operations have been negatively impacted by increased raw materials costs for commodities such as polypropylene and poly-vinyl chloride in the light building products segment. During fiscal 2011, we experienced some significant cost increases for certain raw materials and transportation fuel. We currently believe it is possible that costs for raw materials and other commodities such as fuels, along with the prices of other goods and services, could continue to increase in future periods. We have passed through certain increased raw materials costs to customers, but it is not possible to accurately predict the future trends of these costs, nor our ability to pass on future price increases.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Summary of Cash Flow Activities.  Net cash provided by operating activities during the nine months ended June 30, 2012 (2012) was $12.0 million, compared to net cash used in operating activities of $(87.0) million during the nine months ended June 30, 2011 (2011). The large net loss in 2011 was due primarily to three non-routine adjustments. Two of the three adjustments, a $37.0 million impairment of coal cleaning assets and a $15.0 million litigation accrual, did not involve cash. The third adjustment, $68.9 million of interest expense related to our March 2011 senior debt refinancing, most of which did involve the use of cash, was the most significant reason for the $87.0 million use of cash for operations in 2011.

In both periods, our primary investing activity consisted of the purchase of property, plant and equipment and payments for acquisitions. In 2012, we also received approximately $18.5 million of proceeds from the sale of our interest in an equity-method investee. In 2011, our primary financing activity was the March 2011 senior debt refinancing, and in 2012 our primary financing activity consisted of repayments of our long-term convertible debt. More details about these and other investing and financing activities are provided in the following paragraphs.

Investing Activities.  In 2012, total expenditures for property, plant and equipment and payments for acquisitions were $19.2 million, a decrease of $0.6 million from 2011. In both periods, the majority of capital expenditures related to the maintenance of operating capacity in our light building products segment. Total fiscal 2012 expenditures for property, plant and equipment and payments for acquisitions are currently expected to be less than the fiscal 2011 level of approximately $30.0 million.

Capital expenditures are limited by the terms of our ABL Revolver to $60.0 million in fiscal 2012. As of June 30, 2012, we were committed to spend approximately $1.4 million on capital projects that were in various stages of completion. In both periods, we acquired certain assets and assumed certain liabilities of some small privately-held companies in the light building products industry.

As noted earlier, we assessed the strategic fit of our various operations and are pursuing divestiture of certain businesses in the energy technology segment which do not align with our long-term strategy. In September 2011, the Board of Directors committed to a plan to sell the coal cleaning business and we sold one coal cleaning facility during 2012 for cash proceeds of $2.0 million plus potential future consideration totaling approximately $8.4 million, which amount would be received over a number of years, depending upon future plant production levels. We currently expect to sell all, or substantially all, of the remaining business before the end of calendar 2012. At the current time, it is not possible to

37

accurately predict the amount of cash we will realize upon sale of the coal cleaning business nor the amount of cash we will expend operating and maintaining the facilities until such time as they are sold.

We intend to continue to expand our business through growth of existing operations in our core light and heavy building materials businesses. Acquisitions have historically been an important part of our long-term business strategy; however, primarily because of covenant restrictions under our former senior secured notes, but also due to cash flow considerations and events affecting the debt and equity markets, we have not made any large acquisitions since 2007. We have also invested in joint ventures which are accounted for using the equity method of accounting, one of which was sold in fiscal 2010 and one of which was sold effective January 1, 2012. Proceeds of approximately $18.5 million were received in 2012 related to the January 2012 sale. We do not currently have plans to significantly increase our investments in any of the remaining joint venture entities, none of which is material. Current debt agreements limit potential acquisitions and investments in joint ventures. During the five-year term of the ABL Revolver, our acquisitions and investments in joint ventures and other less than 100%-owned entities are limited to total cumulative consideration of $30.0 million and $10.0 million annually.

Financing Activities.  In March 2011, we issued $400.0 million of 7-5/8% senior secured notes for net proceeds of approximately $392.8 million. We used most of the net proceeds to repay the former 11-3/8% senior secured notes and the related early repayment premium of approximately $59.0 million (which premium was charged to interest expense). The March 2011 refinancing accomplished several objectives, the most important of which was to extend the maturity of our senior debt.

In 2012, we issued approximately $49.8 million of new 8.75% convertible senior subordinated notes in exchange for cancellation of an equal amount of outstanding 2.50% convertible senior subordinated notes, plus a cash payment of approximately $0.6 million. The unamortized balances of debt discount and debt issue costs related to the $49.8 million of retired 2.50% notes, aggregating approximately $4.5 million, were written off and charged to interest expense. The 8.75% notes have a maturity date of February 2016, which is two years after the maturity date of the 2.50% notes, which extended maturity date was the primary reason for issuing the 8.75%  notes. The 2016 maturity date for the 8.75% notes better matches our projected generation of free cash flow. Other than the different interest rate and two-year extended maturity date, the terms of the 8.75% notes are similar in all material respects to the terms of the 2.50% notes as described in the Form 10-K.

In 2012, we repurchased and canceled approximately $34.7 million in aggregate principal amount of convertible senior subordinated notes for cash consideration of approximately $34.1 million in several different transactions. Terms of repayment for some of these transactions included premiums totaling approximately $1.7 million. For certain other transactions, gains totaling approximately $2.3 million were recognized and recorded in other income. Accelerated debt discount and debt issue costs aggregating approximately $2.2 million were charged to interest expense. In 2011, we repurchased and canceled approximately $14.5 million in aggregate principal amount of our convertible senior subordinated notes. Terms of repayment included premiums totaling approximately $2.6 million, which were recorded in interest expense. Accelerated debt discount and debt issue costs aggregating approximately $1.0 million were also charged to interest expense.

Following all of the above-described transactions, we now have no debt maturities until 2014 and currently believe our cash flows will be sufficient to repay maturing debt on or before the due dates. Debt reduction remains a high priority. We currently plan to continue our program of early convertible debt repayment, depending on future cash flow and as deemed appropriate by our management and Board of Directors. Following certain asset sales, as defined, we could be required to prepay a portion of the senior secured notes.

We were in compliance with all debt covenants as of June 30, 2012. The senior secured notes and ABL Revolver limit the incurrence of additional debt and liens on assets, prepayment of future subordinated debt, merging or consolidating with another company, selling all or substantially all assets, making capital expenditures, making acquisitions and investments and the payment of dividends or distributions, among other things. In addition, if availability under the ABL Revolver is less than 15% of the total $70.0 million commitment, or $10.5 million currently, we are required to maintain a monthly fixed charge coverage ratio of at least 1.0x for the preceding twelve-month period.

There have been no borrowings under the ABL Revolver since it was entered into in October 2009. The ABL Revolver has a termination date of October 2014, with a contingent provision for early termination three months prior to the earliest maturity date of the senior secured notes or any of the convertible senior subordinated notes (currently November 2013), at which time any amounts borrowed must be repaid. The contingent provision for early termination is precluded if, three months prior to any note maturity date, borrowing base capacity under the ABL Revolver and / or cash collateral is at least equivalent to the notes maturing on such date. Availability under the ABL Revolver cannot exceed $70.0 million, which includes a $35.0 million sub-line for letters of credit and a $10.5 million swingline facility. Availability under the ABL Revolver is further limited by the borrowing base valuations of the assets of our light building products and heavy construction materials segments which secure the borrowings, currently consisting of certain trade receivables and inventories. In addition to the first lien

38

position on these assets, the ABL Revolver lenders have a second priority position on substantially all other assets. As of June 30, 2012, availability under the ABL Revolver was approximately $51.1 million. However, due primarily to the seasonality of our operations, the amount of availability varies from period to period and, while not currently expected, it is possible that the availability under the ABL Revolver could fall below the 15% threshold, or $10.5 million, in a future period.

As of June 30, 2012, our fixed charge coverage ratio, as defined in the ABL Revolver agreement, is approximately 0.7. The fixed charge coverage ratio is calculated by dividing EBITDAR minus capital expenditures and cash payments for income taxes by fixed charges. EBITDAR consists of net income (loss) i) plus net interest expense, income taxes (as defined), depreciation and amortization, non-cash charges such as goodwill and other impairments, and rent expense; ii) plus or minus other specified adjustments such as equity earnings or loss in joint ventures. Fixed charges consist of cash payments for debt service plus rent expense. If availability under the ABL Revolver were to decline below $10.5 million at some future date and the fixed charge coverage ratio were to also be below 1.0, the ABL Revolver lender could issue a notice of default. If a notice of default were to become imminent, we would seek an amendment to the ABL Revolver, or alternatively, a waiver of the availability requirement and/or fixed charge coverage ratio for a period of time. See Note 6 to the consolidated financial statements and our Form 10-K for more detailed descriptions of the terms of our long-term debt and our ABL Revolver.

In February 2012, we filed a universal shelf registration statement with the SEC under which $210.0 million is available for future offerings of securities. A prospectus supplement describing the terms of any additional securities to be issued is required to be filed before any future offering could commence under the registration statement.

Working Capital.  As of June 30, 2012, our working capital was $61.4 million (including $29.0 million of cash and cash equivalents) compared to $69.6 million as of September 30, 2011. Notwithstanding the continuing pressure on our revenues as a result of existing economic conditions, we currently expect operations to produce positive cash flow during the September 2012 quarter and in future years. We currently believe working capital will be sufficient for our operating needs for the next 12 months, and that it will not be necessary to utilize borrowing capacity under the ABL Revolver for our seasonal operational cash needs for the foreseeable future.

Income Taxes.  Cash outlays for income taxes in both periods were less than $1.5 million and consisted primarily of estimated state income taxes. We have utilized our fiscal 2009 and prior year federal NOLs by carrying those amounts back to prior years, receiving income tax refunds. NOLs and tax credit carryforwards for fiscal 2010 were offset by our existing deferred income tax liabilities resulting in a near $0 deferred tax position as of September 30, 2010. In fiscal 2011, we recorded a full valuation allowance on our net amortizable deferred tax assets, a situation that is also expected to continue throughout fiscal 2012 and beyond. As of June 30, 2012, our NOL and capital loss carryforwards total approximately $70.9 million (tax effected). The U.S. and state NOLs and capital losses expire from 2012 to 2032. Substantially all of the non-U.S. NOLs do not expire. In addition, there are approximately $22.8 million of tax credit carryforwards as of June 30, 2012, which expire from 2014 to 2032. We do not currently expect cash outlays for income taxes during the next 12 months to be significant.

Summary of Future Cash Requirements.  Significant cash requirements for the next 12 months, beyond seasonal operational working capital requirements, consist primarily of interest payments on long-term debt and capital expenditures. In future periods, significant cash requirements will also include the repayment of debt, but not prior to February 2014. Reference is made to Note 12 to the consolidated financial statements where the potential risks of litigation are described in detail. Adverse conclusions to those legal matters could involve material amounts of cash outlays in future periods.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

Reference is made to Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements for a discussion of accounting pronouncements that have been issued which we have not yet adopted.

ITEM 3.QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

We are exposed to financial market risks, primarily related to our stock price. In addition, future borrowings, if any, under our ABL Revolver will bear interest at a variable rate, as described in Note 6 to the consolidated financial statements. We do not use derivative financial instruments for speculative or trading purposes. Through December 31, 2011, we were also exposed to market risks related to the activities of one of our joint ventures, the Blue Flint joint venture, which had derivatives in place related to variable interest rates and commodities. As described in Note 13 to the consolidated financial statements, we sold our interest in that joint venture effective January 1, 2012.

As described in more detail in Note 12 to the consolidated financial statements, the Compensation Committee approved grants of performance unit awards to certain officers and employees in the corporate business unit, to be settled in cash, based on the achievement of goals related to consolidated free cash flow generated in the second half of fiscal 2010. During the nine months ended June 30, 2012, we recorded approximately $0.8 million of expense for the 2010 performance unit awards due to

39

an increase in the average 60-day stock price between September 30, 2011 and June 30, 2012. The change in our stock price through the final vest date of September 30, 2012 will result in adjustment of the expected liability, which adjustment (whether positive or negative) will be reflected in our statement of operations for the September 2012 quarter. Assuming the average closing stock price for the 60 days in the period ended June 30, 2012 of $4.35 remains unchanged for the September 30, 2012 vest date, the total payouts under this arrangement for the final vest date, all of which have been accrued as of June 30, 2012, would be approximately $1.5 million. A 10% change in the 60-day average stock price as of September 30, 2012 from the June 30, 2012 average of $4.35 would result in an increase or decrease of approximately $0.2 million in the September 30, 2012 payout liability.

Also as described in Note 12 to the consolidated financial statements, the Compensation Committee approved grants of performance unit awards to certain officers and employees in the corporate business unit, to be settled in cash, based on the achievement of goals related to consolidated free cash flow generated during fiscal 2012. During the nine months ended June 30, 2012, we recorded approximately $4.2 million of expense for the 2012 performance unit awards, calculated based on progress toward the consolidated free cash flow goal for the year and an increase in the stock price between September 30, 2011 and June 30, 2012. Changes in our free cash flow generation as well as changes in the stock price through September 30, 2012 will result in adjustment of the expected liability as of September 30, 2012, which adjustment (whether positive or negative) will be reflected in our statement of operations for the September 2012 quarter. Changes in the stock price can result in an increase or decrease in the estimated September 30, 2012 payout liability; however, any adjustments are also dependent upon the amount of free cash flow generated in the fiscal year.

In fiscal 2011, the Committee approved grants to certain employees of approximately 0.4 million cash-settled SARs, approximately 0.3 million of which are currently outstanding. These SARs vest in annual installments through September 30, 2013, provided the participant is still employed at the respective vesting dates, and will be settled in cash upon exercise by the employee. The SARs terminate on September 30, 2015 and must be exercised on or before that date. As of June 30, 2012, $0.3 million has been accrued for these awards because the stock price at June 30, 2012 was above the grant-date stock price of $3.81. Future changes in our stock price in any amount beyond the grant-date stock price of $3.81 through September 30, 2015 will result in adjustment to the expected liability, which adjustment (whether positive or negative) will be reflected in our statement of operations each quarter.

During the December 2011 quarter, the Committee approved grants to certain officers and employees of approximately 1.0 million cash-settled SARs, with terms similar to those described above. Approximately $1.5 million has been accrued for these awards as of June 30, 2012. Changes in our stock price in any amount beyond the grant-date stock price of $1.85 through September 30, 2016 will result in adjustment to the expected liability, which adjustment (whether positive or negative) will be reflected in our statement of operations each quarter.

If all of the above-described SARs ultimately vest and the stock price is above the grant-date stock prices, a change in the stock price of $1.00 would result in an increase or decrease of approximately $1.3 million in the ultimate payout liability.

ITEM 4.CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Disclosure Controls and Procedures — We maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information we are required to disclose in the reports that we file or submit under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act), such as this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified by SEC rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information we are required to disclose in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to our management, including the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) and the Chief Financial Officer (CFO), to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Our management evaluated, with the participation of our CEO and CFO, the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of June 30, 2012, pursuant to paragraph (b) of Rules 13a-15 and 15d-15 under the Exchange Act. This evaluation included a review of the controls’ objectives and design, the operation of the controls, and the effect of the controls on the information presented in this Quarterly Report. Our management, including the CEO and CFO, do not expect that disclosure controls can or will prevent or detect all errors and all fraud, if any. A control system, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Our disclosure controls and procedures are designed to provide such reasonable assurance of achieving their objectives. Also, the projection of any evaluation of the disclosure controls and procedures to future periods is subject to the risk that the disclosure controls and procedures may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

40

Based on their review and evaluation, and subject to the inherent limitations described above, our CEO and CFO have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act) were effective as of June 30, 2012 at the above-described reasonable assurance level.

Internal Control over Financial Reporting — Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act. Our internal control over financial reporting is designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

Because of inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Therefore, even internal controls determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and presentation. The effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting is subject to various inherent limitations, including cost limitations, judgments used in decision making, assumptions about the likelihood of future events, the possibility of human error, and the risk of fraud. The projection of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods is subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with policies may deteriorate. Because of these limitations, there can be no assurance that any system of internal control over financial reporting will be successful in preventing all errors or fraud or in making all material information known in a timely manner to the appropriate levels of management.

There has been no change in our internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended June 30, 2012 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

PART II — OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1.LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

See “Legal Matters” in Note 12 to the consolidated financial statements for a description of current legal proceedings.

ITEM 1A.RISK FACTORS

Risks relating to our business, our common stock and indebtedness are described in Item 1A of our Form 10-K.

ITEM 2.UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS

We did not have any sales of unregistered equity securities during the three-month period ended June 30, 2012, but did purchase treasury stock. As described in Notes 9 and 12 to the consolidated financial statements, our Board of Directors approved a new Directors’ Deferred Compensation Plan (DDCP) under which non-employee directors can elect to defer certain compensation and choose from various options how the deferred compensation will be invested. One of the investment options is Headwaters common stock. When an eligible director chooses our common stock as an investment option, we purchase the common stock in open-market transactions in accordance with the director’s request and hold the shares until such time as the deferred compensation obligation becomes payable. At such time, the treasury shares will be distributed to the director in satisfaction of the obligation.

41

The following table provides details about the treasury stock purchased in connection with the DDCP during the quarter ended June 30, 2012.

(in thousands, except per-share data)

Period	Total Number of Shares Purchased	Average Price Paid per Share (1)		Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs	Approximate Dollar Value of Shares that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs
April 1, 2012 – April 30, 2012	0	n/a		n/a	n/a
May 1, 2012 – May 31, 2012	14,192	$	4.51	n/a	n/a
June 1, 2012 – June 30, 2012	0	n/a		n/a	n/a
Total	14,192	$	4.51	n/a	n/a

(1)Includes broker commissions.

ITEM 3.DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES

None.

ITEM 4.MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

Our discontinued coal cleaning operations are subject to regulation by the federal Mine Safety and Health Administration (“MSHA”) under the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977 (the “Mine Act”).  Information concerning mine safety violations or other regulatory matters required by section 1503(a) of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the “Dodd-Frank Act”) and Item 106 of Regulation S-K (17 CFR 229.106) is included in Exhibit 95 to this quarterly report.

ITEM 5.OTHER INFORMATION

None.

ITEM 6.EXHIBITS

The following exhibits are included herein:

10.60	Employment Agreement with Kirk A. Benson, dated as of 30 July 2012	*
12	Computation of ratio of earnings to combined fixed charges and preferred stock dividends	*
31.1	Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Executive Officer	*
31.2	Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Financial Officer	*
32	Section 1350 Certifications of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer	*
95	Mine Safety Disclosure	*
101.INS	XBRL Instance document	**
101.SCH	XBRL Taxonomy extension schema	**
101.CAL	XBRL Taxonomy extension calculation linkbase	**
101.DEF	XBRL Taxonomy extension definition linkbase	**
101.LAB	XBRL Taxonomy extension label linkbase	**
101.PRE	XBRL Taxonomy extension presentation linkbase	**

*Filed herewith.

**Furnished herewith.

42

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

	HEADWATERS INCORPORATED
Date: August 2, 2012	By:	/s/ Kirk A. Benson
		Kirk A. Benson, Chief Executive Officer
		(Principal Executive Officer)
Date: August 2, 2012	By:	/s/ Donald P. Newman
		Donald P. Newman, Chief Financial Officer
		(Principal Financial Officer)

43