XML 72 R51.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.4.0.3
Fair Value Measurements (Schedule Of Valuation Process And Unobservable Inputs) (Detail)
$ in Millions
3 Months Ended 12 Months Ended
Mar. 31, 2016
USD ($)
$ / credit
$ / MMBTU
$ / lb
$ / MWh
$ / MW
Dec. 31, 2015
USD ($)
$ / credit
$ / MMBTU
$ / lb
$ / MWh
$ / MW
Natural Gas | Discounted Cash Flow | Minimum    
Fair Value Inputs [Abstract]    
Counterparty credit risk [1],[2] 0.40% 0.40%
Nodal basis [3] (0.60) (0.10)
Credit risk [1],[2] 0.40% 0.40%
Natural Gas | Discounted Cash Flow | Maximum    
Fair Value Inputs [Abstract]    
Counterparty credit risk [1],[2] 6.00% 12.00%
Nodal basis [3] 0 0
Credit risk [1],[2] 0.40% 0.40%
Natural Gas | Discounted Cash Flow | Weighted Average    
Fair Value Inputs [Abstract]    
Counterparty credit risk [1],[2] 0.93% 7.00%
Nodal basis [3] (0.50) (0.10)
Credit risk [1],[2] 0.40% 0.40%
Natural Gas | Option Model | Minimum    
Fair Value Inputs [Abstract]    
Volatilities [3]   35.00%
Nodal basis [2]   (0.30)
Natural Gas | Option Model | Maximum    
Fair Value Inputs [Abstract]    
Volatilities [3]   55.00%
Nodal basis [2]   0
Natural Gas | Option Model | Weighted Average    
Fair Value Inputs [Abstract]    
Volatilities [3]   45.00%
Nodal basis [2]   (0.20)
Natural Gas | Derivative Liabilities    
Fair Value Inputs, Assets and Liabilities, Quantitative Information [Line Items]    
Derivative assets | $ [4] $ 0 $ 1
Derivative liabilities | $ [4] $ (1) $ (1)
Power | Discounted Cash Flow | Minimum    
Fair Value Inputs [Abstract]    
Counterparty credit risk [1],[2] 0.55% 0.86%
Nodal basis | $ / MWh (10) [5] (10) [6]
Credit risk [1],[2] 0.40% 0.40%
Average forward peak and off-peak pricing | $ / MWh [6] 18 22
Estimated auction price | $ / MW [3] (818) (270)
Power | Discounted Cash Flow | Maximum    
Fair Value Inputs [Abstract]    
Counterparty credit risk [1],[2] 0.55% 0.86%
Nodal basis | $ / MWh (1) [5] (1) [6]
Credit risk [1],[2] 0.40% 0.40%
Average forward peak and off-peak pricing | $ / MWh [6] 37 39
Estimated auction price | $ / MW [3] 1,062 2,057
Power | Discounted Cash Flow | Weighted Average    
Fair Value Inputs [Abstract]    
Counterparty credit risk [1],[2] 0.55% 0.86%
Nodal basis | $ / MWh (2) [5] (3) [6]
Credit risk [1],[2] 0.40% 0.40%
Average forward peak and off-peak pricing | $ / MWh [6] 27 29
Estimated auction price | $ / MW [3] 67 211
Power | Fundamental Energy Production Model | Minimum    
Fair Value Inputs [Abstract]    
Escalation rate [3],[7] 4.00% 3.00%
Estimated future gas prices [3] 3 3
Power | Fundamental Energy Production Model | Maximum    
Fair Value Inputs [Abstract]    
Escalation rate [3],[7] 4.00% 3.00%
Estimated future gas prices [3] 5 4
Power | Fundamental Energy Production Model | Weighted Average    
Fair Value Inputs [Abstract]    
Escalation rate [3],[7] 4.00% 3.00%
Estimated future gas prices [3] 4 4
Power | Contract Price Allocation | Minimum    
Fair Value Inputs [Abstract]    
Estimated renewable energy credit costs | $ / credit 5 [5] 5 [3]
Power | Contract Price Allocation | Maximum    
Fair Value Inputs [Abstract]    
Estimated renewable energy credit costs | $ / credit 7 [5] 7 [3]
Power | Contract Price Allocation | Weighted Average    
Fair Value Inputs [Abstract]    
Estimated renewable energy credit costs | $ / credit 6 [5] 6 [3]
Power | Derivative Assets    
Fair Value Inputs, Assets and Liabilities, Quantitative Information [Line Items]    
Derivative assets | $ [4],[8] $ 6 $ 16
Power | Derivative Liabilities    
Fair Value Inputs, Assets and Liabilities, Quantitative Information [Line Items]    
Derivative liabilities | $ [4],[8] $ (187) $ (170)
Uranium | Discounted Cash Flow | Minimum    
Fair Value Inputs [Abstract]    
Credit risk [1],[2] 0.40% 0.40%
Average forward pricing | $ / lb [3] 28 35
Uranium | Discounted Cash Flow | Maximum    
Fair Value Inputs [Abstract]    
Credit risk [1],[2] 0.40% 0.40%
Average forward pricing | $ / lb [3] 33 42
Uranium | Discounted Cash Flow | Weighted Average    
Fair Value Inputs [Abstract]    
Credit risk [1],[2] 0.40% 0.40%
Average forward pricing | $ / lb [3] 31 37
Uranium | Option Model | Minimum    
Fair Value Inputs [Abstract]    
Volatilities [3] 2000.00% 20.00%
Uranium | Option Model | Maximum    
Fair Value Inputs [Abstract]    
Volatilities [3] 2000.00% 20.00%
Uranium | Option Model | Weighted Average    
Fair Value Inputs [Abstract]    
Volatilities [3] 2000.00% 20.00%
Uranium | Derivative Assets    
Fair Value Inputs, Assets and Liabilities, Quantitative Information [Line Items]    
Derivative assets | $ [4] $ 0 $ 0
Uranium | Derivative Liabilities    
Fair Value Inputs, Assets and Liabilities, Quantitative Information [Line Items]    
Derivative liabilities | $ [4] $ (4) $ (1)
[1] Counterparty credit risk is applied only to counterparties with derivative asset balances. Ameren Missouri and Ameren Illinois credit risk is applied only to counterparties with derivative liability balances.
[2] Generally, significant increases (decreases) in this input in isolation would result in a significantly lower (higher) fair value measurement.
[3] Generally, significant increases (decreases) in this input in isolation would result in a significantly higher (lower) fair value measurement.
[4] (a)The derivative asset and liability balances are presented net of counterparty credit considerations.
[5] Not applicable.
[6] The balance at Ameren is comprised of Ameren Missouri and Ameren Illinois power contracts, which respond differently to unobservable input changes due to their opposing positions.
[7] Escalation rate applies to power prices 2031 and beyond for March 31, 2016 and to power prices 2026 and beyond for December 31, 2015.
[8] Power valuations use visible third-party pricing evaluated by month for peak and off-peak demand through 2020. Valuations beyond 2020 use fundamentally modeled pricing by month for peak and off-peak demand.