XML 26 R8.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.8
Summary of significant accounting policies
9 Months Ended
Sep. 30, 2014
Accounting Policies [Abstract]  
Significant Accounting Policies [Text Block]
Note 3. Summary of significant accounting policies
 
Basis of presentation
 
The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10–Q and Rule 8–03 of Regulation S–X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and notes required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. However, in the opinion of the management of the Company, all adjustments necessary for a fair presentation of the financial position and operating results have been included in these statements. These condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10–K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013, as filed with the SEC on March 28, 2014. Operating results for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014, are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for any subsequent quarter or for the year ending December 31, 2014. 
 
Use of estimates and assumptions and critical accounting estimates and assumptions  
 
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with US GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date(s) of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period(s).
 
Critical accounting estimates are estimates for which (a) the nature of the estimate is material due to the levels of subjectivity and judgment necessary to account for highly uncertain matters or the susceptibility of such matters to change and (b) the impact of the estimate on financial condition or operating performance is material. The Company’s critical accounting estimates and assumptions affecting the financial statements were:
 
 
a)
Fair value of long–lived assets: Fair value is generally determined using the asset’s expected future discounted cash flows or market value, if readily determinable. If long–lived assets are determined to be recoverable, but the newly determined remaining estimated useful lives are shorter than originally estimated, the net book values of the long–lived assets are depreciated over the newly determined remaining estimated useful lives. The Company considers the following to be some examples of important indicators that may trigger an impairment review: (i) significant under–performance or losses of assets relative to expected historical or projected future operating results; (ii) significant changes in the manner or use of assets or in the Company’s overall strategy with respect to the manner or use of the acquired assets or changes in the Company’s overall business strategy; (iii) significant negative industry or economic trends; (iv) increased competitive pressures; (v) a significant decline in the Company’s stock price for a sustained period of time; and (vi) regulatory changes. The Company evaluates acquired assets for potential impairment indicators at least annually and more frequently upon the occurrence of such events.
 
 
b)
Valuation allowance for deferred tax assets: Management assumes that the realization of the Company’s net deferred tax assets resulting from its net operating loss (“NOL”) carry–forwards for Federal income tax purposes that may be offset against future taxable income was not considered more likely than not and accordingly, the potential tax benefits of the net loss carry–forwards are offset by a full valuation allowance. Management made this assumption based on (a) the Company has incurred recurring losses, (b) general economic conditions, and (c) its ability to raise additional funds to support its daily operations by way of a public or private offering, among other factors.
 
 
c)
Estimates and assumptions used in valuation of equity instruments: Management estimates expected term of share options and similar instruments, expected volatility of the Company’s common shares and the method used to estimate it, expected annual rate of quarterly dividends, and risk free rate(s) to value share options and similar instruments.
 
These significant accounting estimates or assumptions bear the risk of change due to the fact that there are uncertainties attached to these estimates or assumptions, and certain estimates or assumptions are difficult to measure or value.
 
Management bases its estimates on historical experience and on various assumptions that are believed to be reasonable in relation to the financial statements taken as a whole under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources.
 
Management regularly evaluates the key factors and assumptions used to develop the estimates utilizing currently available information, changes in facts and circumstances, historical experience and reasonable assumptions. After such evaluations, if deemed appropriate, those estimates are adjusted accordingly. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
 
Principles of consolidation
 
All intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated. Non–controlling interest represents the minority equity investment in MGT subsidiaries, plus the minority investors’ share of the net operating results and other components of equity relating to the non–controlling interest.
 
(Loss) / income per share
 
Basic loss per share is calculated by dividing net loss applicable to common shareholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted loss per share is calculated by dividing the net loss attributable to common shareholders by the sum of the weighted average number of common shares outstanding plus potential dilutive common shares outstanding during the period. Potential dilutive securities, comprised of the convertible Preferred Stock, warrants and unvested restricted shares, are not reflected in diluted net loss per share because such shares are anti–dilutive.
 
The computation of diluted loss per share for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014 excludes 9,845 shares in connection to the convertible Preferred Stock, 1,020,829 warrants and 130,000 unvested restricted shares, as they are anti–dilutive due to the Company’s net loss. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013, the computation excluded 15,748 Common Shares in connection with the Series A Convertible Preferred Stock, 1,534,321 warrants and 176,667 unvested restricted shares, as they were anti–dilutive due to the Company’s net loss.
 
Recent accounting pronouncements
 
In April 2014, the U.S. Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Accounting Standards Update 2014–08, Reporting Discontinued Operations and Disclosures of Disposals of Components of an Entity  (ASU 2014–08). This new standard (i) raises the threshold for disposals to qualify as discontinued operations (ii) allows companies to have significant continuing involvement and continuing cash flows with the discontinued operation, and (iii) provides for new and additional disclosures of discontinued operations and individually material disposal transactions. The Company anticipates adopting the new standard when it becomes effective in the first quarter of 2015.
 
In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Accounting Standards Update 2014–09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers. Amendments in this Update create Topic 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, and supersede the revenue recognition requirements in Topic 605, Revenue Recognition, including most industry–specific revenue recognition guidance throughout the Industry Topics of the Codification. In addition, the amendments supersede the cost guidance in Subtopic 605–35, Revenue Recognition—Construction–Type and Production–Type Contracts, and create new Subtopic 340–40, Other Assets and Deferred Costs—Contracts with Customers. In summary, the core principle of Topic 606 is that an entity recognizes revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. This Accounting Standards Update is the final version of Proposed Accounting Standards Update 2011–230—Revenue Recognition (Topic 605) and Proposed Accounting Standards Update 2011–250—Revenue Recognition (Topic 605): Codification Amendments, both of which have been deleted. Accounting Standards Update 2014–09. The amendments in this Update are effective for the Company for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim periods within that reporting period. The Company is currently evaluating the effects of ASU 2014–09 on the condensed consolidated financial statements.
 
In June 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Accounting Standards Update 2014–11, Transfers and Servicing. The amendments in this Update require that repurchase–to–maturity transactions be accounted for as secured borrowings consistent with the accounting for other repurchase agreements. In addition, the amendments require separate accounting for a transfer of a financial asset executed contemporaneously with a repurchase agreement with the same counterparty (a repurchase financing), which will result in secured borrowing accounting for the repurchase agreement. The amendments require an entity to disclose information about transfers accounted for as sales in transactions that are economically similar to repurchase agreements, in which the transferor retains substantially all of the exposure to the economic return on the transferred financial asset throughout the term of the transaction. In addition the amendments require disclosure of the types of collateral pledged in repurchase agreements, securities lending transactions, and repurchase–to–maturity transactions and the tenor of those transactions. This Accounting Standards Update is the final version of Proposed Accounting Standards Update 2013–10—Transfers and Servicing (Topic 860), which has been deleted. The accounting changes in this Update are effective for the first interim or annual period beginning after December 15, 2014. ASU 2014–11 is not expected to have a material impact on the condensed consolidated financial statements.
 
In June 2014, FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2014–12, Compensation – Stock Compensation (Topic 718), which clarifies accounting for share–based payments for which the terms of an award provide that a performance target could be achieved after the requisite service period. That is the case when an employee is eligible to retire or otherwise terminate employment before the end of the period in which a performance target could be achieved and still be eligible to vest in the award if and when the performance target is achieved. The updated guidance clarifies that such a term should be treated as a performance condition that affects vesting. As such, the performance target should not be reflected in estimating the grant–date fair value of the award. Compensation cost should be recognized in the period in which it becomes probable that the performance target will be achieved and should represent the compensation cost attributable to the periods for which the requisite service has already been rendered. The guidance will be effective for the annual periods (and interim periods therein) ending after December 15, 2015. Early application is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the effects of ASU 2014–12 on the condensed consolidated financial statements.
 
In August 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Accounting Standards Update 2014–13, Consolidation. Topic 810 requires a reporting entity to consolidate a collateralized financing entity if it is the primary beneficiary of that collateralized financing entity. A collateralized financing entity is a variable interest entity that holds financial assets and issues beneficial interests in those financial assets. The beneficial interests have recourse only to the related financial assets of the collateralized financing entity and are classified as financial liabilities. Upon initial consolidation, many elect or are required to account for the financial assets and financial liabilities of the consolidated collateralized financing entity at fair value. The fair value of a collateralized financing entity’s financial assets may differ from the fair value of its financial liabilities even though the financial liabilities have recourse only to the financial assets. Diversity in practice has developed in the accounting for that measurement difference in both initial consolidation and subsequent measurement of the fair values of the assets and the liabilities of a collateralized financing entity. This Update addresses that measurement difference. The amendments would apply to reporting entities that are required to consolidate a collateralized financing entity under the Variable Interest Entity Subsections of Subtopic 810–10. This Accounting Standards Update is the final version of Proposed Accounting Standards Update EITF–12R—Consolidation—Measuring the Financial Liabilities of a Consolidated Collateralized Financing Entity (Topic 810), which has been deleted.  ASU 2014–13 is not expected to have a material impact on the condensed consolidated financial statements.
 
In August 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Accounting Standards Update 2014–15, Presentation of Financial Statements – Going Concern. The Update provides U.S. GAAP guidance on management’s responsibility in evaluating whether there is substantial doubt about a company’s ability to continue as a going concern and about related footnote disclosures. For each reporting period, management will be required to evaluate whether there are conditions or events that raise substantial doubt about a company’s ability to continue as a going concern within one year from the date the financial statements are issued. This Accounting Standards Update is the final version of Proposed Accounting Standards Update 2013–300—Presentation of Financial Statements (Topic 205): Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entity’s Going Concern Presumption, which has been deleted. The Company is currently evaluating the effects of ASU 2014–15 on the condensed consolidated financial statements.
 
Subsequent events
 
The Company has evaluated events that occurred subsequent to September 30, 2014 and through the date of the condensed consolidated financial statements were issued.