10-Q

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C.   20549

FORM 10-Q

         S

   QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)

   OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended March 30, 2013

         £

   TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)

   OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the Transition Period from _______ to _______

Commission File Number 0-27026

Pericom Semiconductor Corporation

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)

California
(State or Other Jurisdiction of
Incorporation or Organization) 77-0254621
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)

3545 North First Street

San Jose, California  95134

(408) 435-0800

(Address of Principal Executive Offices and

Issuer’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes     

S

No  £

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).  Yes S   No £

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large Accelerated Filer       £                                                        Accelerated Filer           S

Non-accelerated Filer          £                                                        Smaller Reporting Company      £

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 126-2 of the Exchange Act)

Yes     £

No

S

As of May 1, 2013 the Registrant had outstanding 22,941,000 shares of Common Stock.

Pericom Semiconductor Corporation

Form 10-Q for the Quarter Ended March 30, 2013

INDEX

PART I.  FINANCIAL INFORMATION			Page
	Item 1:	Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
		Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of
		March 30, 2013 and June 30, 2012	3
		Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations
		for the three and nine months ended March 30, 2013
		and March 31, 2012	4
		Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income
		(Loss) for the three and nine months ended March 30, 2013
		and March 31, 2012	5
		Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
		for the nine months ended March 30, 2013
		and March 31, 2012	6
		Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements	7
	Item 2:	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of
		Financial Condition and Results of Operations	22
	Item 3:	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about
		Market Risk	31
	Item 4:	Controls and Procedures	31
PART II.  OTHER INFORMATION
	Item 1A:	Risk Factors	32
	Item 2:	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	42
	Item 6:	Exhibits	43
	Signatures

2

PART I.  FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1: Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

Pericom Semiconductor Corporation

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets

(In thousands, except share data)

(Unaudited)

	March 30, 2013		June 30, 2012
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	27,193	$	24,283
Short-term investments in marketable securities		65,432		79,924
Accounts receivable
Trade (net of reserves and allowances of $2,541 and $2,566)		20,739		24,010
Other receivables		3,133		3,674
Inventories		13,874		16,604
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		2,708		2,425
Deferred income taxes		1,564		1,549
Total current assets		134,643		152,469
Property, plant and equipment – net		60,329		56,102
Investments in unconsolidated affiliates		2,390		2,474
Deferred income taxes – non-current		2,416		2,447
Long-term investments in marketable securities		26,566		23,628
Goodwill		16,901		16,797
Intangible assets (net of accumulated amortization of $8,997 and $6,629)		10,578		12,831
Other assets		8,643		9,058
Total assets	$	262,466	$	275,806
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Short-term debt	$	197	$	1,364
Accounts payable		10,203		14,860
Accrued liabilities		8,982		8,608
Total current liabilities		19,382		24,832
Industrial development subsidy		7,385		8,577
Deferred income taxes		5,888		6,191
Other long-term liabilities		3,428		2,571
Total liabilities		36,083		42,171
Commitments and contingencies (Note 6)
Shareholders’ equity:
Common stock and paid in capital - no par value, 60,000,000 shares
authorized; shares issued and outstanding: March 30, 2013,
22,941,000; June 30, 2012, 23,565,000		120,222		123,362
Retained earnings		95,865		100,694
Accumulated other comprehensive income, net of tax		10,296		9,579
Total shareholders' equity		226,383		233,635
Total liabilities and shareholders' equity	$	262,466	$	275,806

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

3

Pericom Semiconductor Corporation

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations

 (In thousands, except per share amounts)

(Unaudited)

	Three Months Ended						Nine Months Ended
	March 30, 2013			March 31, 2012			March 30, 2013			March 31, 2012
Net revenues	$	30,366		$	33,378		$	97,548		$	99,191
Cost of revenues		19,521			21,789			61,597			64,088
Gross profit		10,845			11,589			35,951			35,103
Operating expenses:
Research and development		5,277			5,669			15,697			16,262
Selling, general and administrative		7,193			7,114			22,364			21,513
Total operating expenses		12,470			12,783			38,061			37,775
Loss from operations		(1,625	)		(1,194	)		(2,110	)		(2,672	)
Interest and other income, net		1,318			847			2,748			2,555
Income (loss) before income taxes		(307	)		(347	)		638			(117	)
Income tax expense (benefit)		395			(76	)		5,652			123
Loss from consolidated companies		(702	)		(271	)		(5,014	)		(240	)
Equity in net income of unconsolidated affiliates		21			4			186			83
Net loss	$	(681	)	$	(267	)	$	(4,828	)	$	(157	)
Basic loss per share	$	(0.03	)	$	(0.01	)	$	(0.21	)	$	(0.01	)
Diluted loss per share	$	(0.03	)	$	(0.01	)	$	(0.21	)	$	(0.01	)
Shares used in computing basic loss per share		23,162			24,030			23,407			24,255
Shares used in computing diluted loss per share		23,162			24,030			23,407			24,255

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

4

Pericom Semiconductor Corporation

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss)

 (In thousands)

(Unaudited)

	Three Months Ended						Nine Months Ended
	March 30, 2013			March 31, 2012			March 30, 2013			March 31, 2012
Net loss	$	(681	)	$	(267	)	$	(4,828	)	$	(157	)
Other comprehensive income (loss):
Change in net unrealized gain (loss) on securities      available for sale, net of tax		(97	)		754			152			85
Foreign currency translation adjustment		(508	)		1,413			565			1,007
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax		(605	)		2,167			717			1,092
Comprehensive income (loss)	$	(1,286	)	$	1,900		$	(4,111	)	$	935

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

5

Pericom Semiconductor Corporation

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

 (In thousands)

(Unaudited)

	Nine Months Ended
	March 30, 2013				March 31, 2012
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net loss		$	(4,828	)		$	(157	)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization			8,364				8,959
Share-based compensation			2,543				2,833
Tax benefit resulting from stock option transactions			431				382
Excess tax benefit resulting from stock option transactions			(3	)			(4	)
Write-off of receivables			—				300
Gain on sale of investments			(852	)			(556	)
Write-off of property and equipment			244				292
Equity in net income of unconsolidated affiliates			(186	)			(83	)
Deferred taxes			(328	)			(56	)
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable			3,925				8,203
Inventories			2,882				4,617
Prepaid expenses and other current assets			178				(1,962	)
Other assets			48				75
Accounts payable			(4,743	)			(451	)
Accrued liabilities			(590	)			(2,401	)
Other long-term liabilities			349				41
Net cash provided by operating activities			7,434				20,032
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Purchase of property, plant and equipment			(10,753	)			(5,108	)
Purchase of available-for-sale investments			(76,805	)			(84,080	)
Maturities and sales of available-for-sale investments			89,127				76,749
Acquisition of PTI, net of cash acquired			—				(8,076	)
Change in restricted cash balance			—				2,947
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities			1,569				(17,568	)
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Proceeds from common stock issuance under stock plans			420				525
Proceeds from short-term debt			3,877				10,743
Payments on short-term debt			(5,088	)			(15,206	)
Excess tax benefit resulting from stock option transactions			3				4
Repurchase of common stock			(6,115	)			(9,223	)
Net cash used in financing activities			(6,903	)			(13,157	)
EFFECT OF EXCHANGE RATE CHANGES ON CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS			810				493
NET CHANGE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS			2,910				(10,200	)
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS:
Beginning of period			24,283				30,023
End of period		$	27,193			$	19,823

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

6

Pericom Semiconductor Corporation

Notes To Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

1. BASIS OF PRESENTATION

The condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared by Pericom Semiconductor Corporation (“Pericom” or the “Company”) pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. In the opinion of management, these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements include all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments and accruals, necessary for a fair presentation of the Company’s financial position as of March 30, 2013, the results of operations for the three and nine months ended March 30, 2013 and March 31, 2012 and cash flows for the nine months ended March 30, 2013 and March 31, 2012. This unaudited quarterly information should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements of Pericom and the notes thereto included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 31, 2012.

The preparation of the interim condensed consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities as of the date of the interim condensed consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the period. Actual amounts could differ from these estimates. The results of operations for the three and nine months ended March 30, 2013 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the entire year. The three and nine month periods ended March 30, 2013 and March 31, 2012 each had 13 and 39 week periods, respectively.

The Company participates in a dynamic high technology industry and believes that changes in any of the following areas could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s future financial position or results of operations: advances and trends in new technologies; competitive pressures in the form of new products or price reductions on current products; changes in the overall demand for products offered by the Company; changes in customer relationships; acquisitions and the subsequent integration of the acquired entity with the Company; litigation or claims against the Company based on intellectual property, patent, product, regulatory or other factors; risks associated with changes in domestic and international economic and/or political conditions or regulations and environmental laws; availability of necessary components; interruptions at wafer suppliers and subcontractors; fluctuations in currencies given the Company’s sales and operations being heavily weighted and paid in foreign currencies; and the Company’s ability to attract and retain employees necessary to support its growth.

These interim condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Pericom Semiconductor Corporation and its wholly owned subsidiaries, Pericom Global Limited (“PGL”), PSE Technology Corporation (“PSE-TW”), and Pericom Asia Limited (“PAL”). PGL has two wholly-owned subsidiaries, Pericom International Limited (“PIL”) and Pericom Semiconductor (HK) Limited (“P­HK”). In addition, PAL has three subsidiaries, PSE Technology (Shandong) Corporation ("PSE-SD") and Pericom Technology Yangzhou Corporation (“PSC-YZ”) for the Jinan, China and Yangzhou, China operations, respectively, and Pericom Technology Inc. (“PTI”). The Company eliminates all intercompany balances and transactions in consolidation.

FISCAL PERIOD – For purposes of reporting the financial results, the Company’s fiscal years end on the Saturday closest to the end of June. The year ended June 30, 2012 is referred to as fiscal year 2012 or fiscal 2012, whereas the current fiscal year 2013 or fiscal 2013 will end on June 29, 2013. Both fiscal 2012 and fiscal 2013 contain 52 weeks or 364 days. Periodically, the Company adds a 53^rd week to a year in order to end that year on the Saturday closest to the end of June.

WARRANTY – The Company offers a standard one-year product replacement warranty. In the past, the Company has not had to accrue for a general warranty reserve, but assesses the level and materiality of return material authorizations (“RMA”s) and determines whether it is appropriate to accrue for estimated returns of defective products at the time revenue is recognized. On occasion, management may determine to accept product returns beyond the standard one-year warranty period. In those instances, the Company

7

accrues for the estimated cost at the time management decides to accept the return. Because of the Company’s standardized manufacturing processes and product testing procedures, returns of defective product are infrequent and the quantities have not been significant. Accordingly, historical warranty costs have not been material.

RECENTLY ISSUED ACCOUNTING STANDARDS

In July 2012, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") No. 2012-02, Topic 350 - Intangibles - Goodwill and Other, which amends Topic 350 to allow an entity to first assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of an indefinite-lived intangible asset is less than its carrying value. An entity is not required to determine the fair value of the indefinite-lived intangible unless the entity determines, based on the qualitative assessment, that it is more likely than not that its fair value is less than the carrying value. This standard is effective for annual and interim impairment tests performed for fiscal years beginning after September 15, 2012 and early adoption is permitted. The Company does not expect the adoption will have an impact on the Company’s consolidated results of operations or financial condition.

In February 2013, the FASB issued ASU No. 2013-02, Reporting of Amounts Reclassified Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income. This guidance is the culmination of the FASB’s deliberation on reporting reclassification adjustments from accumulated other comprehensive income (AOCI). The amendments in ASU 2013-02 do not change the current requirements for reporting net income or other comprehensive income. However, the amendments require disclosure of amounts reclassified out of AOCI in its entirety, by component, on the face of the statement of operations or in the notes thereto. Amounts that are not required to be reclassified in their entirety to net income must be cross referenced to other disclosures that provide additional detail. This standard is effective prospectively for annual and interim reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2012. The adoption of ASU 2013-02 did not have an impact on the Company’s financial statements.

2. GOODWILL AND INTANGIBLE ASSETS

The following table summarizes the activity related to the carrying value of the Company’s goodwill during the nine months ended March 30, 2013:

(In thousands)
Goodwill at June 30, 2012	$	16,797
Currency translation adjustments		104
Goodwill at March 30, 2013	$	16,901

Goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price of an acquired business over the fair value of the underlying net tangible and intangible assets.

The following table summarizes the components of other intangible assets and related accumulated amortization balances for each of the period-ending dates shown, which were recorded as a result of business combinations:

	March 30, 2013							June 30, 2012
(in thousands)	Gross		Accumulated Amortization			Net		Gross		Accumulated Amortization			Net
Customer relationships	$	5,943	$	(2,627	)	$	3,316	$	5,906	$	(1,888	)	$	4,018
eCERA trade name		44		(44	)		—		44		(43	)		1
Core developed technology		13,189		(6,329	)		6,860		13,110		(4,698	)		8,412
Total amortizable purchased intangible assets		19,176		(9,000	)		10,176		19,060		(6,629	)		12,431
SaRonix trade name		402		—			402		400		—			400
Total purchased intangible assets	$	19,578	$	(9,000	)	$	10,578	$	19,460	$	(6,629	)	$	12,831

8

Amortization expense related to finite-lived purchased intangible assets was approximately $775,000 and $2.3 million for the three and nine month periods ended March 30, 2013 and $778,000 and $2.4 million for the three and nine month periods ended March 31, 2012, respectively. Amortization of intangible assets for the nine month period ended March 31, 2012 included accelerated amortization related to a supplier relationship of approximately $125,000 and subsequent asset write-off.

The Company performs an impairment review of its intangible assets at least annually. Based on the results of its most recent impairment review, the Company determined that no impairment of its intangible assets existed as of June 30, 2012. However, future impairment reviews could result in a charge to earnings.

The finite-lived purchased intangible assets consist of supplier and customer relationships, trade names and existing and core technology, which have remaining useful lives from one to five years. The Company expects future amortization expense associated with its intangible assets to be:

	Months from March 30, 2013
(in thousands)	Next 12 Months		13-24 Months		25-36 Months		37-48 Months		49-60 Months		Over 60 Months		Total
Customer relationships	$	970	$	970	$	970	$	406	$	—	$	—	$	3,316
Core developed technology		2,020		1,878		1,878		1,084		—		—		6,860
	$	2,990	$	2,848	$	2,848	$	1,490	$	—	$	—	$	10,176

 3. INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE

Basic income (loss) per share is based upon the weighted average number of common shares outstanding. Diluted income (loss) per share reflects the additional potential dilution that could occur if securities or other contracts to issue common stock were exercised or converted into common stock.

Basic and diluted loss per share for the three and nine month periods ended March 30, 2013 and March 31, 2012 are computed as follows:

	Three Months Ended		Nine Months Ended
(in thousands, except per share data)	March 30, 2013	March 31, 2012	March 30, 2013	March 31, 2012
Net loss	($681)	($267)	($4,828)	($157)
Computation of common shares outstanding – basic loss per share:
Weighted average shares of common stock	23,162	24,030	23,407	24,255
Basic loss per share	($0.03)	($0.01)	($0.21)	($0.01)
Computation of common shares outstanding – diluted loss per share:
Weighted average shares of common stock	23,162	24,030	23,407	24,255
Dilutive shares using the treasury stock method	-	-	-	-
Shares used in computing diluted loss per share	23,162	24,030	23,407	24,255
Diluted loss per share	($0.03)	($0.01)	($0.21)	($0.01)

Options to purchase 2,465,000 and 2,497,000 shares of common stock, and restricted stock units of 562,000 and 596,000 were outstanding during the three and nine months ended March 30, 2013 respectively, but not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share because the options and units would be anti-dilutive under the treasury stock method. Options to purchase 2,611,000 and 2,724,000 shares of common stock, and restricted stock units of 518,000 and 548,000 were outstanding during the three and nine months ended March 31, 2012 respectively, but not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share because the options and units would be anti-dilutive under the treasury stock method. As the Company incurred a net loss for the three and nine months ended March 30, 2013 and March 31, 2012, diluted loss per share is the same as basic loss per share since the addition of any contingently issuable shares would be anti-dilutive.

9

4. INVENTORIES

Inventories consist of:

(in thousands)	March 30, 2013		June 30, 2012
Raw materials	$	6,127	$	7,371
Work in process		3,186		3,981
Finished goods		4,561		5,252
	$	13,874	$	16,604

The Company considers raw material inventory obsolete and reserves it if the raw material has not moved in 365 days. The Company reviews its assembled devices for excess and records a reserve if the quantity of assembled devices in inventory is in excess of the greater of the quantity shipped in the previous twelve months, the quantity in backlog or the quantity forecasted to be shipped in the following twelve months. In certain circumstances, management will determine, based on expected usage or other factors, that inventory considered excess by these guidelines should not be reserved. The Company does occasionally determine that the last twelve months’ sales levels will not continue and reserves inventory in line with the quantity forecasted. As of March 30, 2013, the Company had reserved for $3.3 million of inventory as compared to $3.8 million of inventory reserves at June 30, 2012.

5. ACCRUED LIABILITIES

Accrued liabilities consist of:

(in thousands)	March 30, 2013		June 30, 2012
Accrued compensation	$	5,886	$	5,886
Income taxes payable		1,016		2
Sales commissions		371		497
Accrued construction liabilities		172		845
Other accrued expenses		1,537		1,378
	$	8,982	$	8,608

6. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

The Company’s future minimum commitments at March 30, 2013 are as follows:

	Months from March 30, 2013
(in thousands)	Less than 12 Months		12-24 Months		24-36 Months		36-48 Months		48-60 Months		Total
Short-term debt	$	197	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	197
Operating lease payments		1,282		229		42		2		—		1,555
Capital equipment purchase commitments		11		—		—		—		—		11
Facility modifications		657		—		—		—		—		657
Total	$	2,147	$	229	$	42	$	2	$	—	$	2,420

The operating lease commitments are primarily the lease on the Company’s corporate headquarters, which expires in 2013.

The Company has no purchase obligations other than routine purchase orders and the capital equipment purchase commitments and facility modifications shown in the table as of March 30, 2013.

The Company previously entered into an R&D Agreement for its Yangzhou facility that required capital injections. During the quarter ended March 30, 2013, the Company was notified by the Administration for

10

Industry and Commerce that its capital injections have been approved and the requirements of the R&D Agreement have been satisfied.

7. INDUSTRY AND SEGMENT INFORMATION

The Company has three operating segments which aggregate into one reportable segment, the interconnectivity device supply market. The Company designs, develops, manufactures and markets high performance integrated circuits and frequency control products.

The following table indicates the percentage of the Company’s net revenues and accounts receivable in excess of 10 percent with any single customer:

	Net Revenues
	Three Months Ended						Nine Months Ended
	March 30, 2013			March 31, 2012			March 30, 2013			March 31, 2012
Customer A		24	%		18	%		19	%		17	%
Customer B		11	%		14	%		12	%		14	%
All others		65	%		68	%		69	%		69	%
		100	%		100	%		100	%		100	%
		Accounts Receivable
		March 30, 2013			June 30, 2012
Customer A		25	%		26	%
All others		75	%		74	%
		100	%		100	%

For geographical reporting, the Company attributes net revenues to the country where customers are located (the “bill to” location). The Company neither conducts business in nor sells to persons in Iran, Syria, Sudan, or North Korea, countries located in referenced regions identified as state sponsors of terrorism by the U.S. Department of State and subject to U.S. economic sanctions and export controls. The following table sets forth net revenues by country for the three and nine month periods ended March 30, 2013 and March 31, 2012:

	Net Revenues
	Three Months Ended				Nine Months Ended
(in thousands)	March 30, 2013		March 31, 2012		March 30, 2013		March 31, 2012
China (including Hong Kong)	$	15,459	$	11,543	$	45,549	$	34,422
Taiwan		8,635		15,227		33,721		45,232
United States		1,969		2,010		5,008		5,670
Other (less than 10% each)		4,303		4,598		13,270		13,867
Total net revenues	$	30,366	$	33,378	$	97,548	$	99,191

Long-lived assets consist of all non-monetary assets, excluding financial assets, deferred taxes, goodwill and intangible assets. The Company attributes long-lived assets to the country where they are located. The following table sets forth the Company’s long-lived assets by country of location as of March 30, 2013 and June 30, 2012:

11

(in thousands)	March 30, 2013		June 30, 2012
China (including Hong Kong)	$	35,567	$	37,761
Taiwan		14,831		15,005
United States		9,092		2,304
Korea		579		650
Others (less than 10% each)		260		382
Total long-lived assets	$	60,329	$	56,102

8. STOCK REPURCHASE PROGRAM

On April 29, 2008, the Company’s Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of $30 million worth of common stock, and on April 26, 2012, the Board authorized an additional share repurchase program for $25 million of common stock. The Company may repurchase the shares from time to time in open market or private transactions, at the discretion of the Company’s management.

During the nine month period ended March 30, 2013, the Company repurchased 847,470 shares for an aggregate cost of approximately $6.1 million. During the nine month period ended March 31, 2012, the Company repurchased 1,184,229 shares for an aggregate cost of approximately $9.2 million. Current cash balances and the proceeds from stock option exercises and purchases in the stock purchase plan have funded stock repurchases in the past, and the Company expects to fund future stock repurchases from these same sources. As of March 30, 2013, the Company had approximately $19.6 million of repurchase authority remaining under the 2012 authority.

9. SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY AND SHARE-BASED COMPENSATION

PREFERRED STOCK

The Company’s shareholders have authorized the Board of Directors to issue 5,000,000 shares of preferred stock from time to time in one or more series and to fix the rights, privileges and restrictions of each series. As of March 30, 2013, the Company has issued no shares of preferred stock.

STOCK OPTION PLANS

At March 30, 2013 the Company had four stock incentive plans and an employee stock purchase plan, consisting of the 1995 Stock Option Plan, 2001 Stock Option Plan, SaRonix Acquisition Stock Option Plan, 2004 Stock Incentive Plan and the 2010 Employee Stock Purchase Plan.

Under the four stock incentive plans, the Company has reserved an aggregate of 5.2 million shares of common stock as of March 30, 2013 for issuance to employees, officers, directors, independent contractors and consultants of the Company in the form of incentive or nonqualified stock options, or grants of restricted stock.

The Company may grant stock options at the fair value on the grant date for incentive stock options and nonqualified stock options. Options vest over periods of generally 48 months as determined by the Board of Directors. Options granted under the Plans expire 10 years from the grant date.

The Company estimates the fair value of each employee stock option on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option valuation model and expenses that value as compensation using a straight-line method over the option’s vesting period, which corresponds to the requisite employee service period. The Company estimates expected stock price volatility based on actual historical volatility for periods that the Company believes represent predictors of future volatility. The Company uses historical data to estimate option exercises, expected option holding periods and option forfeitures. The Company bases the risk-free interest rate for periods within the contractual life of the option on the U.S. Treasury yield corresponding to the expected life of the underlying option.

12

The value of the Company’s stock options granted under its stock incentive plans during the three months ended March 30, 2013 was estimated at the date of grant using the following weighted average assumptions:

	Three Months Ended
	March 30, 2013
Expected Life		5.9 years
Risk-free interest rate		1.13	%
Volatility		54	%
Dividend Yield		—

No stock options were granted under the stock incentive plans during the three months ended March 31, 2012.

The following table summarizes the Company’s stock option activity for the nine months ended March 30, 2013:

	Shares			Weighted Average Exercise Price		Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Term		Aggregate Intrinsic Value
	(in thousands)					(years)		(in thousands)
Options outstanding at June 30, 2012		2,453		$	10.34		5.12	$	912
Granted		175			8.54
Exercised		(6	)		7.87
Cancelled or expired		(157	)		9.58
Options outstanding at March 30, 2013		2,465		$	10.27		4.82	$	25
Options vested and expected to vest at March 30, 2013		2,433		$	10.29		4.76	$	25
Options exercisable at March 30, 2013		2,110		$	10.52		4.21	$	25

At March 30, 2013, 1.6 million shares were available for future grants under the incentive plans. The aggregate intrinsic value of options exercised during the nine months ended March 30, 2013 was not significant.

At March 30, 2013, expected future compensation expense relating to options outstanding is $1.3 million, which will be amortized to expense over a weighted average period of 2.3 years.

Additional information regarding options outstanding and exercisable as of March 30, 2013 is as follows:

				Options Outstanding						Exercisable Options
Range of Exercise Prices				Number Outstanding as of March 30, 2013		Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Term (years)		Weighted Average Exercise Price		Number Exercisable as of March 30, 2013		Weighted Average Exercise Price
$	4.89	$	8.03		500,000		4.99	$	7.72		399,000	$	7.73
	8.10		8.85		582,000		5.14		8.52		410,000		8.45
	8.86		10.01		497,000		5.27		9.74		435,000		9.71
	10.15		14.57		494,000		3.71		11.00		474,000		10.98
	14.68		18.10		392,000		4.94		15.87		392,000		15.87
$	4.89	$	18.10		2,465,000		4.82	$	10.27		2,110,000	$	10.52

13

Restricted Stock Units

Restricted stock units (“RSUs”) are converted into shares of the Company’s common stock upon vesting on a one-for-one basis. Typically, vesting of RSUs is subject to the employee’s continuing service to the Company. RSUs generally vest over a period of 4 years and are expensed ratably on a straight-line basis over their respective vesting period net of estimated forfeitures. The fair value of RSUs granted pursuant to the Company’s 2004 Stock Incentive Plan is the product of the number of shares granted and the grant date fair value of the common stock. A summary of activity of RSUs for the nine months ended March 30, 2013 is presented below:

	Shares			Weighted Average Award Date Fair Value		Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Term		Aggregate Intrinsic Value
	(in thousands)					(years)		(in thousands)
RSUs outstanding at June 30, 2012		504		$	9.06		1.42	$	4,535
Awarded		277			7.81
Released		(160	)		9.52
Forfeited		(59	)		8.26
RSUs outstanding at March 30, 2013		562		$	8.39		1.54	$	3,969
RSUs expected to vest after March 30, 2013		496		$	8.43		1.45	$	3,505

At March 30, 2013, expected future compensation expense relating to RSUs is $3.2 million, which will be amortized to expense over a weighted average remaining recognition period of 2.5 years.

2010 EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN

The Company’s 2010 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the “Stock Purchase Plan”) allows eligible employees of the Company to purchase shares of Common Stock through payroll deductions. The Company reserved 2.0 million shares of the Company’s Common Stock for issuance under this Plan, of which 1.8 million remain available at March 30, 2013. The Stock Purchase Plan permits eligible employees to purchase Common Stock at a discount through payroll deductions during six-month purchase periods. The six-month periods come to an end on or about May 1 and November 1 and the purchases are then made. Thus there were no purchases under the Stock Purchase Plan for the three months ended March 30, 2013 and March 31, 2012. Participants in the Stock Purchase Plan may purchase stock at 85% of the lower of the stock’s fair market value on the first day and last day of the offering period. The maximum number of shares of Common Stock that any employee may purchase during any offering period under the plan is 1,500 shares, and an employee may not accrue more than $15,000 for share purchases in any offering period.During the first nine months of fiscal years 2013 and 2012, the Company issued 56,809 and 55,915 shares of common stock under the Stock Purchase Plan at weighted average prices of $6.57 and $7.22, respectively. The weighted average fair value of the awards for the first nine months of fiscal 2013 and 2012 were $1.77 and $2.43 per share, respectively.

The Company estimates the fair value of stock purchase rights granted under the Company’s Stock Purchase Plan on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option valuation model. ASC Topic 718 states that a “lookback” pricing provision with a share limit should be considered a combination of stock and a call option. The valuation results for these elements have been combined to value the specific features of the stock purchase rights. The Company bases volatility on the expected volatility of the Company’s stock during the offering period. The expected term is determined by the time from enrollment until purchase, and the Company uses the U.S. Treasury yield for the risk-free interest rate for the offering period.

The following table summarizes activity in the Company’s employee stock purchase plan during the nine months ended March 30, 2013:

14

	Shares			Weighted Average Purchase Price
Beginning Available		1,835,939
Purchases		(56,809	)	$	6.57
Ending Available		1,779,130

At March 30, 2013, the Company had $18,000 in unamortized share-based compensation related to its employee stock purchase plan which will be amortized and recognized in the consolidated statement of operations over the next month.

SHARE-BASED COMPENSATION

The following table shows total share-based compensation expense classified by Consolidated Statements of Operations reporting caption for the three and nine months ended March 30, 2013 and March 31, 2012 generated from the plans described above:

	Three Months Ended						Nine Months Ended
(In thousands)	March 30, 2013			March 31, 2012			March 30, 2013			March 31, 2012
Cost of revenues	$	51		$	60		$	146		$	161
Research and development		317			371			972			1,099
Selling, general and administrative		474			496			1,425			1,573
Pre-tax share-based compensation expense		842			927			2,543			2,833
Income tax impact		(277	)		(41	)		(838	)		(689	)
Net share-based compensation expense	$	565		$	886		$	1,705		$	2,144

Share-based compensation by type of award is as follows:

		Three Months Ended				Nine Months Ended
(In thousands)		March 30, 2013		March 31, 2012		March 30, 2013		March 31, 2012
Stock options	$	265	$	304	$	803	$	1,074
Restricted stock units		523		549		1,578		1,556
Stock purchase plan		54		74		162		203
Total share-based compensation expense	$	842	$	927	$	2,543	$	2,833

The amount of share-based compensation expense capitalized in inventory at March 30, 2013 and June 30, 2012 is immaterial.

10. INCOME TAXES

Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes

The Company’s total amount of unrecognized tax benefits as of March 30, 2013 was $2,697,000. $2,298,000 of this amount would affect the Company’s tax rate if recognized. In addition, as of March 30, 2013 the Company had accrued $319,000 for any interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits.

The Company’s effective tax rate may differ from the federal statutory rate primarily due to state income taxes, stock-based compensation from incentive stock options, the employee stock purchase plan and

15

foreign non-qualified stock options, differing tax rates in income-earning foreign jurisdictions, and the inability to utilize losses in certain foreign entities to offset domestic income.

The Company is subject to examination by federal, foreign, and various state jurisdictions for the years 2006 through 2012. The Company is currently under examination of the federal tax returns for fiscal 2010 and 2011 by the Internal Revenue Service.

Income Tax Expense

In fiscal 2013, we began implementation of an operating structure to more efficiently align the Company's transaction flows with the Company's geographic business operations. We have foreign sales offices in Korea, Taiwan, Japan, Singapore and Hong Kong, manufacturing operations in Taiwan and China, and research and development centers in Hong Kong and China. Revenues from non-U.S. regions account for over 90% of all revenue. In addition, nearly all of our suppliers are located in the Asia Pacific region. Based on these factors we have formed new legal entities and begun realigning existing ones, completed the intercompany transfer of intellectual property rights, inventory and fixed assets across different tax jurisdictions, and implemented intercompany intellectual property licensing agreements between our U.S. and foreign entities. These actions have resulted in a gain for tax purposes, for which we recorded a $5.0 million tax provision during the nine months ended March 30, 2013.

Income tax expense for the nine months ended March 30, 2013 and March 31, 2012 was $5.7 million and $123,000, respectively, and was comprised of domestic federal and state income tax and foreign income and withholding tax. The income tax expense for the nine months ended March 30, 2013 included the $5.0 million tax provision discussed above. As of March 30, 2013, the Company has recorded a valuation allowance of $4.3 million against certain of its deferred tax assets.

11. INVESTMENT IN UNCONSOLIDATED AFFILIATE

The Company’s investment in an unconsolidated affiliate is as follows:

(in thousands)	March 30, 2013	June 30, 2012
Jiyuan Crystal Photoelectric Frequency Technology Ltd.	$2,390	$2,474

PSE-TW has a 49% equity interest in Jiyuan Crystal Photoelectric Frequency Technology Ltd. (“JCP”), an FCP manufacturing company located in Science Park of Jiyuan City, Henan Province, China. JCP is a key manufacturing partner of PSE-TW and supplies PSE-TW with blanks for its surface mount device (“SMD”) production lines. For the first nine months of fiscal 2013 and 2012, the Company’s allocated portion of JCP’s results was income of $186,000 and $83,000, respectively.

12. EQUITY AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

Comprehensive income consists of net income, changes in net unrealized gains (losses) on available-for-sale investments and changes in cumulative currency translation adjustments at consolidated subsidiaries.

As of March 30, 2013, accumulated other comprehensive income of $10.3 million is made up of $346,000 of unrealized gains on available-for-sale investments, net of tax, and $10.0 million of accumulated currency translation gains.

13. SHORT-TERM DEBT

As of March 30, 2013, the Company’s subsidiary PSE-TW has made short-term borrowings under its credit facilities totaling approximately $197,000. The loans are denominated in Japanese Yen and carry variable rates of interest currently at 1.06% per annum. The loans have maturities ranging from 116 to 151 days. PSE-TW has pledged $4.3 million in land and buildings for the loan and credit facilities.

16

14. INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT SUBSIDY

As of March 30, 2013, industrial development subsidies in the amount of $12.6 million have been earned and applied for by PSE-SD from the Jinan Hi-Tech Industries Development Zone Commission based on meeting certain pre-defined criteria. The subsidies may be used for the acquisition of assets or to cover business expenses. When a subsidy is used to acquire assets, the subsidy will be amortized over the useful life of the asset. When a subsidy is used for expenses incurred, the subsidy is regarded as earned upon the incurrence of the expenditure. The remaining balance of the subsidies at March 30, 2013 was $7.4 million, which amount is expected to be recognized over the next three to twenty years.

The Company recognized $185,000 and $191,000 of industrial development subsidy as a reduction of cost of goods sold and $46,000 and $45,000 of industrial development subsidy as a reduction of operating expenses in the consolidated statement of operations for the three month periods ended March 30, 2013 and March 31, 2012, respectively. The Company recognized $1,103,000 and $880,000 of industrial development subsidy as a reduction of cost of goods sold and $136,000 and $135,000 of industrial development subsidy as a reduction of operating expenses in the consolidated statement of operations for the nine month periods ended March 30, 2013 and March 31, 2012, respectively.

15. INVESTMENTS IN MARKETABLE SECURITIES

The Company’s policy is to invest in instruments with investment grade credit ratings. The Company classifies its short-term investments as “available-for-sale” securities and the Company bases the cost of securities sold using the specific identification method. The Company accounts for unrealized gains and losses on its available-for-sale securities as a separate component of shareholders’ equity in the consolidated balance sheets in the period in which the gain or loss occurs. The Company classifies its available-for-sale securities as current or noncurrent based on each security’s attributes. At March 30, 2013, a summary of investments by major security type is as follows:

	As of March 30, 2013
(in thousands)	Amortized Cost		Unrealized Gains		Unrealized Losses			Net Unrealized Gains (Losses)		Fair Market Value
Available-for-Sale Securities
Time deposits	$	12,916	$	—	$	—		$	—	$	12,916
US Treasury securities		373		1		—			1		374
National government and agency securities		5,184		136		—			136		5,320
State and municipal bond obligations		3,175		19		(1	)		18		3,193
Corporate bonds and notes		50,780		414		(69	)		345		51,125
Asset backed securities		10,805		42		(15	)		27		10,832
Mortgage backed securities		8,203		78		(43	)		35		8,238
Total	$	91,436	$	690	$	(128	)	$	562	$	91,998

At June 30, 2012 a summary of investments by major security type is as follows:

	As of June 30, 2012
(in thousands)	Amortized Cost		Unrealized Gains		Unrealized Losses			Net Unrealized Gains (Losses)			Fair Value
Available-for-Sale Securities
Time deposits	$	10,344	$	—	$	—		$	—		$	10,344
US Treasury securities		3,639		—		(5	)		(5	)		3,634
National government and agency securities		6,582		167		—			167			6,749
State and municipal bond obligations		1,772		1		(1	)		—			1,772
Corporate bonds and notes		61,374		461		(197	)		264			61,638
Asset backed securities		10,148		19		(86	)		(67	)		10,081
Mortgage backed securities		9,313		98		(77	)		21			9,334
Total	$	103,172	$	746	$	(366	)	$	380		$	103,552

The above investments are included in short-term and long-term investments in marketable securities on the Company’s condensed consolidated balance sheets.

17

The following tables show the unrealized losses and fair market values of the Company’s investments that have unrealized losses, aggregated by investment category and length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position, at March 30, 2013 and June 30, 2012:

	Continuous Unrealized Losses at March 30, 2013
	Less Than 12 Months				12 Months or Longer				Total
(In thousands)	Fair Market Value		Unrealized Losses		Fair Market Value		Unrealized Losses		Fair Market Value		Unrealized Losses
National government and agency securities	$	141	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	141	$	—
State and municipal bond obligations		1,186		1		—		—		1,186		1
Corporate bonds and notes		7,782		22		2,338		47		10,120		69
Asset backed securities		4,578		8		730		7		5,308		15
Mortgage backed securities		2,190		6		228		37		2,418		43
	$	15,877	$	37	$	3,296	$	91	$	19,173	$	128
		Continuous Unrealized Losses at June 30, 2012
		Less Than 12 Months				12 Months or Longer				Total
(in thousands)		Fair Value		Unrealized Losses		Fair Value		Unrealized Losses		Fair Value		Unrealized Losses
US Treasury securities	$	3,434	$	5	$	—	$	—	$	3,434	$	5
National government and agency securities		327		—		—		—		327		—
State and municipal bond obligations		1,033		1		—		—		1,033		1
Corporate bonds and notes		12,117		85		3,782		112		15,899		197
Asset backed securities		1,784		15		1,595		71		3,379		86
Mortgage backed securities		659		—		403		77		1,062		77
	$	19,354	$	106	$	5,780	$	260	$	25,134	$	366

The unrealized losses are of a temporary nature due to the Company’s intent and ability to hold the investments until maturity or until the cost is recoverable. The unrealized losses are primarily due to fluctuations in market interest rates. The Company reports unrealized gains and losses on its “available-for-sale” securities in accumulated other comprehensive income in shareholders’ equity.

The Company records gains or losses realized on sales of available-for-sale securities in interest and other income, net on its condensed consolidated statements of operations. The cost of securities sold is based on the specific identification of the security and its amortized cost. For the nine months ended March 30, 2013 and March 31, 2012, proceeds from sales and maturities of available-for-sale securities were $89.1 million and $76.7 million, respectively, and realized gains were $852,000 and $556,000, respectively.

The following table lists the fair market value of the Company’s short- and long-term investments by length of time to maturity as of March 30, 2013. Securities with maturities over multiple dates are mortgage-backed (“MBS”) or asset-backed securities (“ABS”) featuring periodic principle paydowns through 2052.

(in thousands)	March 30, 2013
Contractual Maturities
Less than 12 months	$	8,600
One to three years		30,464
Over three years		43,889
Multiple dates		9,045
Total	$	91,998

16. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

The Company defines fair value as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. Valuation techniques used to measure fair value must maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable

18

inputs. The standard describes a fair value hierarchy based on three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value, of which the first two are considered observable and the last is considered unobservable:

• Level 1 - Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.

• Level 2 - Inputs other than Level 1 that are observable, either directly or indirectly, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities.

• Level 3 - Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities.

The following table represents the Company’s fair value hierarchy for financial assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis. All of the investments except US Treasury securities are classified as Level 2 at March 30, 2013. Level 2 pricing is provided by third party sources of market information obtained through the Company’s investment advisors. The Company does not adjust for or apply any additional assumptions or estimates to the pricing information it receives from advisors. The Company’s investment advisors obtain pricing data from independent sources, such as Standard & Poor’s, Bloomberg and Interactive Data Corporation, and rely on comparable pricing of other securities because the Level 2 securities it holds are not actively traded and have fewer observable transactions. The Company considers this the most reliable information available for the valuation of the securities.

The Company’s Level 2 securities include time deposits, government securities, corporate debt securities and mortgage-backed and asset-backed securities. Government securities include US federal agency securities, foreign government and agency securities, and US state and municipal bond obligations. Many of the municipal bonds are insured; those that are not are nearly all AAA/Aaa rated. The corporate debt securities are all investment grade and most are single A-rated or better. The asset-backed securities are AAA/Aaa rated and are backed by auto loans, student loans, credit card balances and residential or commercial mortgages.

	As of March 30, 2013
(in thousands)	Fair Value		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
Investments (1)
Time deposits	$	16,448	$	—	$	16,448	$	—
US Treasury Securities		374		374		—		—
National government and agency securities		5,320		—		5,320		—
State and municipal bond obligations		3,193		—		3,193		—
Corporate bonds and notes		51,125		—		51,125		—
Asset backed securities		10,832		—		10,832		—
Mortgage backed securities		8,238		—		8,238		—
Total	$	95,530	$	374	$	95,156	$	—

(1)   $3,532 of the time deposits are included in cash and cash equivalents; the balance of the investments are included in short-term and long-term investments in marketable securities on our consolidated balance sheet.

The Company had no transfers into or out of Level 2 during the nine months ended March 30, 2013.

When assessing marketable securities for other-than-temporary declines in value, a number of factors are considered. Analyses of the severity and duration of price declines, remaining years to maturity, portfolio manager reports, economic forecasts, and the specific circumstances of issuers indicate that it is reasonable to expect marketable securities with unrealized losses at March 30, 2013 to recover in fair value up to the Company’s cost bases within a reasonable period of time. The Company does not intend to sell investments with unrealized losses before maturity, when the obligors are required to redeem them at full face value or par. The Company believes the obligors have the financial resources to redeem the debt securities. Accordingly, the Company does not consider the investments to be other-than-temporarily impaired at March 30, 2013.

19

The Company has determined that the amounts reported for cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, deposits, accounts payable, accrued liabilities and debt approximate fair value because of their short maturities and/or variable interest rates.

20

Item 2: Management’s Discussion and Analysis

of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Pericom Semiconductor Corporation

The following information should be read in conjunction with the unaudited financial statements and notes thereto included in Part 1 - Item 1 of this Quarterly Report and the audited financial statements and notes thereto and Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations contained in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2012 (the “Form 10-K”).

Factors That May Affect Operating Results

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q includes “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act and Section 21E of the Exchange Act. All statements other than statements of historical fact are “forward-looking statements” for purposes of these provisions, including any statements regarding our sales to Taiwan and China, the continuation of a high level of turns orders, higher or lower levels of inventory, future gross profit and gross margin; the plans and objectives of management for future operations; our tax rate; currency fluctuations; the adequacy of allowances for returns, price protection and other concessions; the sufficiency of cash generated from operations and cash balances; our exposure to interest rate risk; expectations regarding our research and development and selling, general and administrative expenses; the impact of our new global structure on our future tax rates; and our possible future acquisitions and assumptions underlying any of the foregoing. In some cases, forward-looking statements can be identified by the use of terminology such as “may,” “will,” “expects,” “plans,” “anticipates,” “estimates,” “potential,” or “continue,” or the negative thereof or other comparable terminology. Although we believe that the expectations reflected in the forward-looking statements contained herein are reasonable, there can be no assurance that such expectations or any of the forward-looking statements will prove to be correct, and actual results could differ materially from those projected or assumed in the forward-looking statements. Our future financial condition and results of operations, as well as any forward-looking statements, are subject to risks and uncertainties, including but not limited to the factors set forth (i) in Item 1A, Risk Factors, of Part II of this Form 10-Q, and (ii) in Note 1 to the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements. All forward-looking statements and reasons why results may differ included in this Quarterly Report are made as of the date hereof, and we assume no obligation to update any such forward-looking statement or reason why actual results may differ.

21

Results of Operations

The following table sets forth certain statement of operations data as a percentage of net revenues for the periods indicated.

	Three Months Ended						Nine Months Ended
	March 30, 2013			March 31, 2012			March 30, 2013			March 31, 2012
Net revenues		100.0	%		100.0	%		100.0	%		100.0	%
Cost of revenues		64.3	%		65.3	%		63.1	%		64.6	%
Gross profit		35.7	%		34.7	%		36.9	%		35.4	%
Operating expenses:
Research and development		17.4	%		17.0	%		16.1	%		16.4	%
Selling, general and administrative		23.7	%		21.3	%		22.9	%		21.7	%
Total operating expenses		41.1	%		38.3	%		39.0	%		38.1	%
Loss from operations		(5.4	)%		(3.6	)%		(2.1	)%		(2.7	)%
Interest and other income, net		4.4	%		2.6	%		2.8	%		2.6	%
Loss before income taxes		(1.0	)%		(1.0	)%		0.7	%		(0.1	)%
Income tax expense (benefit)		1.3	%		(0.2	)%		5.8	%		0.1	%
Loss from consolidated companies		(2.3	)%		(0.8	)%		(5.1	)%		(0.2	)%
Equity in net income of unconsolidated affiliates		0.1	%		0.0	%		0.2	%		0.0	%
Net loss		(2.2	)%		(0.8	)%		(4.9	)%		(0.2	)%

Net Revenues

The following table sets forth our revenues and the customer concentrations with respect to such revenues for the periods indicated.

	Three Months Ended									Nine Months Ended
(In thousands)	March 30, 2013			March 31, 2012			% Change			March 30, 2013			March 31, 2012			% Change
Net revenues	$	30,366		$	33,378			-9.0	%	$	97,548		$	99,191			-1.7	%
% of net sales accounted for by top 5 direct customers (1)		41.7	%		44.8	%					41.1	%		46.9	%
Number of direct customers that each account for more than 10% of net sales		2			2						2			2
% of net sales accounted for by top 5 end customers (2)		27.4	%		26.1	%					29.7	%		27.4	%
Number of end customers that each account for more than 10% of net sales		1			1						0			0

⁽¹⁾

Direct customers purchase products directly from us and include distributors, contract manufacturers and original equipment manufacturers (“OEM”s).

⁽²⁾

End customers are OEMs and their products are manufactured using our products. End customers may purchase directly from us or from distributors or contract manufacturers. For end customer data, we rely on information provided by our direct distribution and contract manufacturing customers.

We design, develop and market high-performance integrated circuits (“ICs” or IC products) and frequency control products (“FCPs” or FCP products) used in many of today's advanced electronic systems. Our IC products include products that support the connectivity, timing and signal conditioning of high-speed parallel and serial protocols that transfer data among a system's microprocessor, memory and various peripherals, such as displays and monitors, and between interconnected systems. Our FCPs are electronic components that provide frequency references such as crystals, oscillators, and hybrid timing generation products for computer, communication and consumer electronic products. Our analog, digital and mixed-signal ICs, together with our FCP products enable higher system bandwidth and signal quality, resulting in better operating reliability, signal integrity, and lower overall system cost in applications such as notebook computers, servers, network switches and routers, storage area networks, digital TVs, cell phones, GPS and digital media players.

22

Net revenues consist of product sales, which we generally recognize upon shipment, less an estimate for returns and allowances.

Net revenues decreased $3.0 million or 9.0% in the third quarter of fiscal 2013 versus the third quarter of fiscal 2012. The decreased sales are primarily the result of continued economic softness in both domestic and international markets. Net revenue for IC and FCP products in the third quarter of fiscal 2013 versus the third quarter of fiscal 2012 reflected:

· a $3.2 million decrease in sales of IC products to $17.7 million, a decrease of 15.4%, and

· an increase of $198,000 or 1.6% in sales of our FCP products to $12.7 million.

Net revenue decreased $1.6 million or 1.7% in the first nine months of fiscal 2013 versus the first nine months of fiscal 2012. This increase reflects changes in IC and FCP product sales as follows:

· a $4.1 million decrease in sales of IC products to $58.4 million, a 6.5% sales decrease, and

· an increase of $2.4 million or 6.6% in sales of our FCP products to $39.1 million.

Sales of FCP products in the first nine months of fiscal 2012 were suppressed by supply chain interruptions related to severe flooding during the 2011 monsoon season in Thailand which lasted from August through December in many parts of the country.  

The following table sets forth net revenues by country as a percentage of total net revenues for the three and nine months ended March 30, 2013 and March 31, 2012:

	Net Revenues
	Three Months Ended						Nine Months Ended
	March 30, 2013			March 31, 2012			March 30, 2013			March 31, 2012
China (including Hong Kong)		51	%		35	%		47	%		35	%
Taiwan		28	%		46	%		35	%		46	%
United States		6	%		6	%		5	%		6	%
Other (less than 10% each)		15	%		13	%		13	%		13	%
Total		100	%		100	%		100	%		100	%

Over the past several years, sales to Taiwan and China have constituted the majority of our sales. We expect this trend will continue in the future.

Our net revenue levels have been highly dependent on the number of new orders that are received for products to be delivered to the customer within the same quarter, also called “turns” orders. Because of our lack of visibility into demand when turns orders are high, it is difficult to predict which products to build to match future demand. We believe the current high level of turns orders will continue indefinitely. The sustainability of customer demand is uncertain and our markets are highly dependent on worldwide economic conditions. The high level of turns orders together with the uncertainty of product mix and pricing makes it difficult to predict future levels of sales and may require us to carry higher levels of inventory.

Gross Profit

The following table sets forth our gross profit for the periods indicated:

	Three Months Ended									Nine Months Ended
(In thousands)	March 30, 2013			March 31, 2012			% Change			March 30, 2013			March 31, 2012			% Change
Net revenues	$	30,366		$	33,378			-9.0	%	$	97,548		$	99,191			-1.7	%
Gross profit		10,845			11,589			-6.4	%		35,951			35,103			2.4	%
Gross profit as a percentage of net revenues (gross margin)		35.7	%		34.7	%					36.9	%		35.4	%

23

The decrease in gross profit in the third quarter of fiscal 2013 as compared to the third quarter of fiscal 2012 of $744,000 is the result of:

· a 9.0% decrease in sales, which led to $1.0 million of decreased gross profit, partially offset by

· a gross margin increase from 34.7% to 35.7%, resulting in a $0.3 million improvement in gross profit.

The increase in gross profit in the first nine months of fiscal 2013 as compared to the first nine months of fiscal 2012 of $848,000 is primarily the result of:

· a gross margin increase from 35.4% to 36.9%, resulting in a $1.4 million increase in gross profit, partially offset by

· a 1.7% decrease in sales, which led to $0.6 million of decreased gross profit

Future gross profit and gross margin are highly dependent on the level and product mix of net revenues. This includes the mix of sales between lower margin FCP products and our higher margin integrated circuit products. Although we have been successful at favorably improving our integrated circuit product mix and penetrating new end markets, there can be no assurance that this will continue. Accordingly, we are not able to predict future gross profit levels or gross margins with certainty.

During the three and nine months ended March 30, 2013, gross profit and gross margin benefited as a result of the sale of inventory of $92,000 and $240,000 respectively, that we had previously identified as excess and written down to zero value, as compared with benefits of $30,000 and $171,000, respectively, for the same periods of the prior year.

Research and Development (“R&D”)

	Three Months Ended									Nine Months Ended
(In thousands)	March 30, 2013			March 31, 2012			% Change			March 30, 2013			March 31, 2012			% Change
Net revenues	$	30,366		$	33,378			-9.0	%	$	97,548		$	99,191			-1.7	%
Research and development		5,277			5,669			-6.9	%		15,697			16,262			-3.5	%
R&D as a percentage of net revenues		17.4	%		17.0	%					16.1	%		16.4	%

Research and development expenses consist primarily of costs related to personnel and overhead, non-recurring engineering charges, and other costs associated with the design, prototyping, testing, manufacturing process design support, and technical customer applications support of our products. The $392,000 expense reduction for the three month period ended March 30, 2013 as compared to the same period of the prior year is primarily attributable to decreases of $201,000 in depreciation and amortization, $82,000 in facilities expenses, $165,000 in restructuring expenses and $145,000 in fabrication and assembly expenditures, partially offset by increased compensation expenditures of $170,000. The $565,000 expense reduction for the nine month period ended March 30, 2013 as compared to the same period of the prior year is primarily attributable to decreases of $529,000 in depreciation and amortization, $111,000 in facilities expenses, $163,000 in restructuring expenses and $275,000 in fabrication and assembly expenditures, partially offset by increased compensation expenditures of $474,000.

We believe that continued spending on research and development to develop new products and improve manufacturing processes is critical to our long-term success, and as a result we expect to continue to invest in research and development projects. In the short term, we intend to continue to focus on cost control as business conditions improve. If business conditions deteriorate or the rate of improvement does not meet our expectations, we may implement further cost-cutting actions.

24

Selling, General and Administrative (“SG&A”)

	Three Months Ended									Nine Months Ended
(In thousands)	March 30, 2013			March 31, 2012			% Change			March 30, 2013			March 31, 2012			% Change
Net revenues	$	30,366		$	33,378			-9.0	%	$	97,548		$	99,191			-1.7	%
Selling, general and administrative		7,193			7,114			1.1	%		22,364			21,513			4.0	%
SG&A as a percentage of net revenues		23.7	%		21.3	%					22.9	%		21.7	%

Selling, general and administrative expenses consist primarily of personnel and related overhead costs for sales, marketing, finance, administration, human resources and general management. The expense increase of approximately $79,000 for the three month period ended March 30, 2013 as compared to the same period of the prior year is attributable primarily to increased charges of $28,000 in compensation expenses and $58,000 of increased expenditures for legal, accounting and information systems services. The expense increase of approximately $851,000 for the nine month period ended March 30, 2013 as compared to the same period of the prior year is attributable primarily to increased charges of $532,000 in compensation expenses, $217,000 for facilities-related expenses and $443,000 of increased expenditures for legal, accounting and information systems services, partially offset by decreases of $310,000 in charges for receivables write-offs.

We anticipate that selling, general and administrative expenses will increase in future periods over the long term due to increased staffing levels, particularly in sales and marketing, as well as increased commission expense to the extent we achieve higher sales levels. We intend to continue our focus on controlling costs. If business conditions deteriorate or the rate of improvement does not meet our expectations, we may implement further cost-cutting actions.

Interest and Other Income, Net

	Three Months Ended									Nine Months Ended
(In thousands)	March 30, 2013			March 31, 2012			% Change			March 30, 2013			March 31, 2012			% Change
Interest income	$	910		$	975			-6.7	%	$	2,656		$	2,555			4.0	%
Other income (expense)		(78	)		(15	)					(184	)		(169	)
Exchange gain (loss)		486			(113	)					276			169
Interest and other income	$	1,318		$	847					$	2,748		$	2,555

Interest and other income, net for the three month period ended March 30, 2013 increased $471,000 as compared with the same period of the prior year due primarily to $486,000 of exchange gains this year as opposed to exchange losses last year. Interest and other income, net for the nine month period ended March 30, 2013 increased $193,000 as compared with the same period of the prior year due primarily to a $107,000 increase in exchange gains and a $101,000 increase in interest income.

Income Tax Expense (Benefit)

	Three Months Ended						Nine Months Ended
(In thousands)	March 30, 2013			March 31, 2012			March 30, 2013		March 31, 2012
Pre-tax income (loss)	$	(307	)	$	(347	)	$	638	$	(117	)
Income tax expense (benefit)		395			(76	)		5,652		123
Effective tax rate		NM			22	%		NM		NM
NM means not meaningful

In fiscal 2013, we have begun implementation of an operating structure to more efficiently align the Company's transaction flows with the Company's geographic business operations. We have foreign sales offices in Korea, Taiwan, Japan, Singapore and Hong Kong, manufacturing operations in Taiwan and China, and research and development centers in Hong Kong and China. Revenues from non-U.S. regions account for over 90% of all revenue. In addition, nearly all of our suppliers are located in the Asia Pacific region. Based on these factors we have formed new legal entities and begun realigning existing ones,

25

completed the intercompany transfer of intellectual property rights, inventory and fixed assets across different tax jurisdictions, and implemented intercompany intellectual property licensing agreements between our U.S. and foreign entities. These actions resulted in a gain for tax purposes, for which we have recorded a $5.0 million tax provision. The $123,000 of income taxes for the nine month period ended March 31, 2012, despite having $117,000 of pretax losses, is due primarily to changes in forecasted income for the balance of the year and the allocation of earnings between different tax jurisdictions.

Our effective tax rate may differ from the federal statutory rate primarily due to state income taxes, research and development tax credits, share-based compensation from incentive stock options, the employee stock purchase plan and foreign non-qualified stock options, tax-exempt interest income, and differing tax rates in income-earning foreign jurisdictions.

Equity in Net Income of Unconsolidated Affiliates

Equity in net income of unconsolidated affiliates consists of our allocated portion of the net income of Jiyuan Crystal Photoelectric Frequency Technology Ltd. (“JCP”), an FCP manufacturing company located in Science Park of Jiyuan City, Henan Province, China. JCP is a key manufacturing partner of PSE-TW, and PSE-TW has acquired a 49% equity interest in JCP. For the three and nine month periods ended March 30, 2013, the Company’s allocated portion of JCP’s results was income of $21,000 and $186,000, respectively, as compared with income of $4,000 and $83,000 for the three and nine month periods ended March 31, 2012, respectively.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

As of March 30, 2013, our principal sources of liquidity included cash, cash equivalents and short-term and long-term investments of approximately $119.2 million as compared with $127.8 million on June 30, 2012.

Our investment in debt securities includes government securities, corporate debt securities and mortgage-backed and asset-backed securities. Government securities include US treasury securities, US federal agency securities, foreign government and agency securities, and US state and municipal bond obligations. Many of the municipal bonds are insured; those that are not are nearly all AAA/Aaa rated. The corporate debt securities are all investment grade and nearly all are single A-rated or better. The asset-backed securities are AAA/Aaa rated and are backed by auto loans, student loans, credit card balances and residential or commercial mortgages. Most of our mortgage-backed securities are collateralized by prime residential mortgages issued by government agencies including FNMA, FHLMC and FHLB. Those issued by banks are AAA-rated. At March 30, 2013, unrealized gains on marketable securities net of taxes were $346,000. When assessing marketable securities for other than temporary declines in value, we consider a number of factors. Our analyses of the severity and duration of price declines, portfolio manager reports, economic forecasts and the specific circumstances of issuers indicate that it is reasonable to expect marketable securities with unrealized losses at March 30, 2013 to recover in fair value up to our cost bases within a reasonable period of time. We have the ability and intent to hold investments with unrealized losses until maturity, when the obligors are required to redeem them at full face value or par, and we believe the obligors have the financial resources to redeem the debt securities. Accordingly, we do not consider our investments to be other than temporarily impaired at March 30, 2013.

As of March 30, 2013, $27.2 million was classified as cash and cash equivalents compared with $24.3 million as of June 30, 2012. The maturities of our short term investments are staggered throughout the year so that cash requirements are met. Because we are a fabless semiconductor manufacturer, we have lower capital equipment requirements than other semiconductor manufacturers who own wafer fabrication facilities. For the nine month period ended March 30, 2013, we spent approximately $10.8 million on property and equipment compared to $5.1 million for the nine month period ended March 31, 2012. We generated approximately $2.7 million of interest income for the nine month period ended March 30, 2013, as compared with $2.6 million of interest income for the nine month period ended March 31, 2012. In the longer term we may generate less interest income if our total invested balance decreases and these decreases are not offset by rising interest rates or increased cash generated from operations or other sources.

26

Our net cash provided by operating activities of $7.4 million for the nine months ended March 30, 2013 was primarily the result of non-cash expenses of $8.4 million in depreciation and amortization, $2.5 million of share-based compensation expense, $431,000 tax benefit from stock option transactions and $244,000 write-off of property and equipment, partially offset by a net loss of $4.8 million, $852,000 gain on sale of investments in marketable securities and $186,000 equity in net income of unconsolidated affiliates. Additional contributions to cash included decreases of $3.9 million in accounts receivable, $178,000 in prepaid expenses and other current assets and $2.9 million in inventory, and an increase of $349,000 in other long-term liabilities. Such contributions were partially offset by a decrease of $4.7 million in accounts payable and $590,000 in accrued liabilities. Our net cash provided by operating activities was $20.0 million in the nine months ended March 31, 2012.

Our cash provided by investing activities of $1.6 million for the nine months ended March 30, 2013 was the result of sales and maturities of available for sale investments exceeding purchases of available for sale investments by $12.3 million, partially offset by additions to property and equipment of approximately $10.8 million. Our cash used in investing activities was $17.6 million for the nine months ended March 31, 2012.

Our cash used in financing activities for the nine months ended March 30, 2013 of $6.9 million was primarily the result of using $6.1 million for repurchase of our common stock and repayments of short-term debt exceeding draws by $1.2 million, partially offset by $420,000 of proceeds from common stock issuance under stock plans. Our cash used in financing activities was $13.2 million for the nine months ended March 31, 2012.

A portion of our cash may be used to acquire or invest in complementary businesses or products or to obtain the right to use complementary technologies. From time to time, in the ordinary course of business, we may evaluate potential acquisitions of such businesses, products or technologies.

Our long-term future capital requirements will depend on many factors, including our level of revenues, the timing and extent of spending to support our product development efforts, the expansion of sales and marketing efforts, the timing of our introductions of new products, the costs to ensure access to adequate manufacturing capacity, and the continuing market acceptance of our products. We could be required, or could elect, to seek additional funding through public or private equity or debt financing and additional funds may not be available on terms acceptable to us or at all. We believe our current cash balances and cash flows generated by operations will be sufficient to satisfy our anticipated cash needs for working capital and capital expenditures.

Contractual Obligations and Commitments

Our contractual obligations and commitments at March 30, 2013 are as follows:

			Payments Due by Period
(In thousands)	Total		Less than 1 Year		1 – 3 Years		3 – 5 Years		Thereafter
Short-term debt	$	197	$	197	$	—	$	—	$	—
Operating leases		1,555		1,282		271		2		—
Capital equipment purchase obligations		11		11		—		—		—
Facility modifications		657		657		—		—		—
Total obligations	$	2,420	$	2,147	$	271	$	2	$	—

The operating lease commitments are primarily the lease on the Company’s corporate headquarters, which expires in 2013.

The Company has no purchase obligations other than routine purchase orders and the capital equipment purchase commitments and facility modifications shown in the table as of March 30, 2013.

The Company previously entered into an R&D Agreement for its Yangzhou facility that required capital injections. During the quarter ended March 30, 2013, the Company was notified by the Administration for

27

Industry and Commerce that its capital injections have been approved and the requirements of the R&D Agreement have been satisfied.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We have no off-balance sheet arrangements, defined by Regulation S-K Item 303(a)(4).

Critical Accounting Policies

Our condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The preparation of such statements requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period and the reported amounts of assets and liabilities as of the date of the financial statements. Our estimates are based on historical experience and other assumptions that we consider to be reasonable given the circumstances. Actual results may vary from our estimates.

The methods, estimates and judgments we use in applying our most critical accounting policies have a significant impact on the results we reports in our financial statements. The Securities and Exchange Commission has defined the most critical accounting policies as the ones that are most important to the portrayal of our financial condition and results of operations, and require us to make our most difficult and subjective accounting judgments, often as a result of the need to make estimates of matters that are inherently uncertain. Based on this definition, our most critical accounting policies include revenue recognition and accounts receivable allowances, which impact the recording of revenues; valuation of inventories, which impacts costs of goods sold and gross margins; accounting for income taxes, which impacts the income tax provision and net income; impairment of goodwill, other intangible assets and investments, which impacts the goodwill, intangible asset and investment accounts; and stock-based compensation, which impacts costs of goods sold and operating expenses. These policies and the estimates and judgments involved are discussed further below.

REVENUE RECOGNITION. We recognize revenue from the sale of our products upon shipment, provided title and risk of loss has passed to the customer, the price is fixed or determinable and collection of the revenue is reasonably assured. A provision for estimated future returns and other charges against revenue is recorded at the time of shipment. For the nine months ended March 30, 2013, the majority of our revenues were from sales to distributors.

We sell products to large, domestic distributors at the price listed in our price book for that distributor. We recognize revenue at the time of shipment. At the time of sale we record a sales reserve for ship from stock and debits (“SSD”s), stock rotations, return material authorizations (“RMA”s), authorized price protection programs, and any special programs approved by management. The sales reserve is offset against revenues, which then leads to the net revenue amount reported.

The market price for our products can be significantly different from the book price at which the product was sold to the distributor. When the market price, as compared with the book price, of a particular sales opportunity from the distributor to their customer would result in low or negative margins to the distributor, a ship from stock and debit is negotiated with the distributor. SSD history is analyzed and used to develop SSD rates that form the basis of the SSD sales reserve recorded each period. We capture these historical SSD rates from our historical records to estimate the ultimate net sales price to the distributor.

Our distribution agreements provide for semi-annual stock rotation privileges of typically 10% of net sales for the previous three-month period. The contractual stock rotation applies only to shipments at book price. Asian distributors typically buy our product at less than book price and therefore are not entitled to the 10% stock rotation privilege. In order to provide for routine inventory refreshing, for our benefit as well as theirs, we grant Asian distributors stock rotation privileges between 1% and 5% even though we are not contractually obligated to do so. Each month a sales reserve is recorded for the estimated stock rotation privilege anticipated to be utilized by the distributors that month. This reserve is the sum of product of each distributor’s net sales for the month and their stock rotation percentage.

From time to time, customers may request to return parts for various reasons including the customers’ belief that the parts are not performing to specification. Many such return requests are the result of customers incorrectly using the parts, not because the parts are defective. These requests are reviewed by

28

management and when approved result in a RMA being established. We are only obligated to accept returns of defective parts. For customer convenience, we may approve a particular return request even though we are not obligated to do so. Each month a sales reserve is recorded for the approved RMAs that have not yet been returned. We do not keep a general warranty reserve because historically valid warranty returns, which are the result of a part not meeting specifications or being non-functional, have been immaterial and parts can frequently be re-sold to other customers for use in other applications.

Price protection is granted solely at the discretion of our management. The purpose of price protection is to reduce the distributor’s cost of inventory as market prices fall, thus reducing SSD rates. Our sales management prepares price protection proposals for individual products located at individual distributors. Our general management reviews these proposals and if a particular price protection arrangement is approved, the dollar impact will be estimated based on the book price reduction per unit for the products approved and the number of units of those products in the distributor’s inventory. A sales reserve is then recorded in that period for the estimated amount.

At the discretion of our management, we may offer rebates on specific products sold to specific end customers. The purpose of the rebates is to allow for pricing adjustments for large programs without affecting the pricing we charge our distributor customers. The rebate is recorded at the time of shipment.

Customers are typically granted payment terms of between 30 and 60 days and they generally pay within those terms. Relatively few customers have been granted terms with cash discounts. Distributors are invoiced for shipments at book price. When they pay those invoices, they claim debits for SSDs, stock rotations, cash discounts, RMAs and price protection when appropriate. Once claimed, these debits are then processed against the approvals.

The revenue we record for sales to our distributors is net of estimated provisions for these programs. When determining this net revenue, we must make significant judgments and estimates. Our estimates are based on historical experience rates, inventory levels in the distribution channel, current trends and other related factors. However, because of the inherent nature of estimates, there is a risk that there could be significant differences between actual amounts and our estimates. Our financial condition and operating results depend on our ability to make reliable estimates and management believes such estimates are reasonable.

PRODUCT WARRANTY. We offer a standard one-year product replacement warranty. In the past we have not had to accrue for a general warranty reserve, but assess the level and materiality of RMAs and determines whether it is appropriate to accrue for estimated returns of defective products at the time revenue is recognized. On occasion, we may determine to accept product returns beyond the standard one-year warranty period. In those instances, we accrue for the estimated cost at the time the decision to accept the return is made. As a consequence of our standardized manufacturing processes and product testing procedures, returns of defective product are infrequent and the quantities have not been significant. Accordingly, historical warranty costs have not been material.

SHIPPING COSTS. Shipping costs are charged to cost of revenues as incurred.

INVENTORIES. Inventories are recorded at the lower of standard cost (which generally approximates actual cost on a first-in, first-out basis) or market value. We adjust the carrying value of inventory for excess and obsolete inventory based on inventory age, shipment history and our forecast of demand over a specific future period of time. Raw material inventory is considered obsolete and reserved if it has not moved in 365 days. We review our assembled devices for excess and write them off if the quantity of assembled devices in inventory is in excess of the greater of the quantity shipped in the previous twelve months, the quantity in backlog or the quantity forecasted to be shipped in the following twelve months.In certain circumstances, we will determine, based on expected usage or other factors, that inventory considered obsolete by these guidelines should not be written off. We occasionally determine that the last twelve months’ sales levels will not continue and reserve inventory in line with the quantity forecasted.The semiconductor markets that we serve are volatile and actual results may vary from our forecast or other assumptions, potentially impacting our assessment of excess and obsolete inventory and resulting in material effects on our gross margin.

IMPAIRMENT OF GOODWILL AND INTANGIBLE ASSETS. We perform an impairment review of our goodwill and intangible assets at least annually and more frequently if certain indicators of impairment are present. In the event that management determines that the value of goodwill or intangible assets has

29

become impaired, we will record an expense for the amount impaired during the fiscal quarter in which the determination is made. Based on the results of our most recent impairment review, we determined that no impairment of our goodwill and intangible assets existed as of June 30, 2012. However, future impairment reviews could result in a charge to earnings.

INVESTMENTS. We have made investments including loans, bridge loans convertible to equity, or asset purchases as well as direct equity investments. These loans and investments are made with strategic intentions and have been in privately held technology companies, which by their nature are high risk. These investments are included in other assets in the balance sheet and are carried at the lower of cost, or market if the investment has experienced an other-than-temporary decline in value. We monitor these investments quarterly and make appropriate reductions in carrying value if a decline in value is deemed to be other than temporary.

DEFERRED TAX ASSETS. Our deferred income tax assets represent temporary differences between the financial statement carrying amount and the tax basis of existing assets and liabilities that will result in deductible amounts in future years, including net operating loss carryforwards. Based on estimates, the carrying value of our net deferred tax assets assumes that it is more likely than not that we will be able to generate sufficient future taxable income in certain tax jurisdictions. Our judgments regarding future profitability may change due to future market conditions, changes in U.S. or international tax laws and other factors. If, in the future, we experience losses for a sustained period of time, we may not be able to conclude that it is more likely than not that we will be able to generate sufficient future taxable income to realize our deferred tax assets. If this occurs, we may be required to increase the valuation allowance against the deferred tax assets resulting in additional income tax expense.

ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURE ABOUT MARKET RISK

At March 30, 2013 our investment portfolio consisted of investment-grade fixed income securities, excluding those classified as cash equivalents, of $92.0 million. These securities are subject to interest rate risk and will decline in value if market interest rates increase. However, we do not believe that such a decrease would have a material effect on our results of operations over the next fiscal year. Due to the short duration and conservative nature of these instruments, we do not believe that we have a material exposure to interest rate risk.

When the general economy weakens significantly, as it did in 2008 and 2009, the credit profile, financial strength and growth prospects of certain issuers of interest-bearing securities held in our investment portfolios may deteriorate, and our interest-bearing securities may lose value either temporarily or other than temporarily. We may implement investment strategies of different types with varying duration and risk/return trade-offs that do not perform well. At March 30, 2013, we held a significant portion of our corporate cash in diversified portfolios of investment-grade marketable securities, mortgage- and asset-backed securities, and other securities that had unrealized gains net of tax of $346,000. Although we consider unrealized gains and losses on individual securities to be temporary, there is a risk that we may incur other-than-temporary impairment charges if credit and equity markets are unstable and adversely impact securities issuers.

We transact business in various non-U.S. currencies, primarily the New Taiwan Dollar, the Hong Kong Dollar and the Chinese Renminbi. We are exposed to fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates on accounts receivable and accounts payable from sales and purchases in these foreign currencies and the net monetary assets and liabilities of our foreign subsidiaries. A hypothetical 10% favorable or unfavorable change in foreign currency exchange rates would have a material impact on our financial position and results of operations.

ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

We maintain disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (“the Exchange Act”)) that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and

30

Exchange Commission’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Our management, with the participation of our principal executive officer and principal financial officer has evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures. Based on such evaluation, our principal executive officer and principal financial officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of March 30, 2013.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) during the quarter ended March 30, 2013 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1A: Risk Factors

This quarterly report on Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements which involve risks and uncertainties. Our actual results could differ materially from those anticipated by such forward-looking statement as a result of various factors, including those set forth below. The listing below includes any material changes to and supersedes the description of the risk factors affecting our business previously disclosed in “Part I, Item 1A. Risk Factors” of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2012.

RISKS RELATED TO OUR BUSINESS AND OPERATING RESULTS

In the past, our operating results have varied significantly and are likely to fluctuate in the future, making it difficult to predict our future operating results.

We continue to face a challenging business environment and limited visibility on end-market demands. Wide varieties of factors affect our operating results, many of which are beyond our control. These factors and risks include, but are not limited to, the following:

·

changes in the quantity of our products sold;

·

changes in the average selling price of our products;

·

general conditions in the semiconductor industry;

·

changes in our product mix;

·

a change in the gross margins of our products;

·

the operating results of the FCP product line, which normally has a lower profit margin than IC products;

·

expenses incurred in obtaining, enforcing, and defending intellectual property rights;

·

the timing of new product introductions and announcements by us and by our competitors;

·

customer acceptance of new products introduced by us;

·

delay or decline in orders received from distributors;

·

growth or reduction in the size of the market for interface ICs;

·

the availability of manufacturing capacity with our wafer suppliers, especially to support sales growth and new products;

·

changes in manufacturing costs;

·

fluctuations in manufacturing yields;

·

disqualification by our customers for quality or performance related issues;

·

the ability of customers to pay us;

·

increased research and development expenses associated with new product introductions or process changes;

·

the impairment of our goodwill, intangible assets or other long-lived assets; and

·

fluctuations in our effective tax rate from quarter to quarter.

31

All of these factors are difficult to forecast and could seriously harm our operating results. Our expense levels are based in part on our expectations regarding future sales and are largely fixed in the short term. Therefore, we may be unable to reduce our expenses fast enough to compensate for any unexpected shortfall in sales. Any significant decline in demand relative to our expectations or any material delay of customer orders could harm our operating results. In addition, if our operating results in future quarters fall below public market analysts' and investors' expectations, the market price of our common stock would likely decrease.

The demand for our products depends on the growth of our end users' markets.

Our continued success depends in large part on the continued growth of markets for the products into which our semiconductor and frequency control products are incorporated. These markets include the following:

·

computers, notebooks, tablets and connectivity to related peripherals;

·

data communications and telecommunications equipment including switches and routers;

·

servers and storage equipment including cloud computing requirements;

·

consumer electronics equipment; and

·

embedded systems including video surveillance, medical and automotive.

Any decline in the demand for products in these markets could seriously harm our business, financial condition and operating results. These markets have also historically experienced significant fluctuations in demand. We may also be seriously harmed by slower growth in the other markets in which we sell our products.

Customer demands for the Company’s products are volatile and difficult to predict.

Our business is characterized by short-term orders and shipment schedules. We do not have long-term purchase agreements with any of our customers. Customers can typically cancel or reschedule their orders without significant penalty. We typically plan production and inventory levels based on forecasts of customer demand generated with input from customers and sales representatives. Our customers continuously adjust their inventories in response to changes in end market demand for their products and the availability of semiconductor components. This results in frequent changes in demand for our products. Accordingly, we must rely on multiple assumptions to forecast customer demand. Various external factors that are outside of our control can make it difficult to accurately make such forecasts, and the volatility of customer demand limits our ability to predict future levels of sales and profitability.

Further, as end customer demand can change very quickly, the supply of semiconductors can quickly and unexpectedly match or exceed demand. Also, semiconductor suppliers can rapidly increase production output. This can lead to a sudden oversupply situation and a subsequent reduction in order rates and revenues as customers adjust their inventories to true demand rates. A rapid and sudden decline in customer demand for our products can result in excess quantities of certain of our products relative to demand. Under such circumstances, we may be required to record significant provisions for excess and obsolete inventories. This could materially and adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.

The markets for our products are characterized by rapidly changing technology, and our financial results could be harmed if we do not successfully develop and implement new manufacturing technologies or develop, introduce and sell new products.

The markets for our products are characterized by rapidly changing technology, frequent new product introductions and declining selling prices over product life cycles. We currently offer a comprehensive portfolio of silicon and quartz based products. Our future success depends upon the timely completion and introduction of new products, across all our product lines, at competitive price and performance levels. The success of new products depends on a variety of factors, including the following:

·

product performance and functionality;

·

customer acceptance;

·

competitive cost structure and pricing;

32

·

successful and timely completion of product development;

·

sufficient wafer fabrication capacity; and

·

achievement of acceptable manufacturing yields by our wafer suppliers.

Our failure to successfully develop new products that achieve market acceptance in a timely fashion and that can be efficiently and successfully integrated with our customers’ products could adversely affect our ability to grow our business and improve our operating results. The development, introduction and market acceptance of new products is critical to our ability to sustain and grow our business. Any failure to successfully develop, introduce, market and sell new products could materially adversely affect our business and operating results.

We may also experience delays, difficulty in procuring adequate fabrication capacity for the development and manufacture of new products, or other difficulties in achieving volume production of these products. Even relatively minor errors may significantly affect the development and manufacture of new products. If we fail to complete and introduce new products in a timely manner at competitive price and performance levels, our business would be significantly harmed.

If we do not develop products that our customers and end-users design into their products, or if their products do not sell successfully, our business and operating results would be harmed.

We have relied in the past and continue to rely upon our relationships with our customers and end-users for insights into product development strategies for emerging system requirements. We generally incorporate new products into a customer's or end-user's product or system at the design stage. Our success has been, and will continue to be, dependent upon manufacturers designing our connectivity products into their products. To achieve design wins, which are decisions by manufacturers to design our products into their systems, we must define and deliver cost effective and innovative connectivity solutions on a timely basis that satisfy the manufacturers’ requirements and specifications. Our ability to achieve design wins is subject to numerous risks including competitive pressures as well as technological risks and delays in our product development cycle. However, these design efforts, which can often require significant expenditures by us, may precede product sales, if any, by a year or more. Moreover, the value to us of any design win will depend in large part on the ultimate success of the customer or end-user's product and on the extent to which the system's design accommodates components manufactured by our competitors. If we fail to achieve design wins or if the design wins fail to result in significant future revenues, our operating results would be harmed. If we have problems developing or maintaining our relationships with our customers and end-users, our ability to develop well-accepted new products may be impaired.

Intense competition in the semiconductor industry may reduce the demand for our products or the prices of our products, which could reduce our revenues and gross profits and limit our ability to maintain or grow our business.

The semiconductor industry is intensely competitive, and we expect competition in this industry to continue to increase. This competition has resulted in rapid technological change, evolving standards, reductions in product selling prices and rapid product obsolescence. If we are unable to successfully meet these competitive challenges, we may be unable to maintain and grow our business. Any inability on our part to compete successfully would also adversely affect our results of operations and impair our financial condition.

Our competitors include Analog Devices, Cypress Semiconductor, Fairchild Semiconductor, Hitachi, Integrated Device Technology, Maxim Integrated Products, Motorola, On Semiconductor, NXP, Parade Technologies, PLX Technology, Silicon Laboratories, STMicroelectronics, Texas Instruments, and Toshiba. Most of those competitors have substantially greater financial, technical, marketing, distribution and other resources, broader product lines and longer-standing customer relationships than we do. We also compete with other major or emerging companies that sell products to certain segments of our markets. Competitors with greater financial resources or broader product lines may have a greater ability to sustain price reductions in our primary markets in order to gain or maintain market share.

We believe that our future success will depend on our ability to continue to improve and develop our products and processes. Unlike us, many of our competitors maintain internal manufacturing capacity for the fabrication and assembly of semiconductor products. This ability may provide them with more reliable manufacturing capability, shorter development and manufacturing cycles and time-to-market advantages.

33

In addition, competitors with their own wafer fabrication facilities that are capable of producing products with the same design geometries as ours may be able to manufacture and sell competitive products at lower prices. Any introduction of products by our competitors that are manufactured with improved process technology could seriously harm our business. As is typical in the semiconductor industry, our competitors have developed and marketed products that function similarly or identically to ours. If our products do not achieve performance, price, size or other advantages over products offered by our competitors, we might lose market share. Competitive pressures could also reduce market acceptance of our products, reduce our prices and increase our expenses.

We also face competition from the makers of ASICs and other system devices. These devices may include interface logic functions that may eliminate the need or sharply reduce the demand for our products in particular applications.

Downturns in the semiconductor industry, rapidly changing technology, accelerated selling price erosion and evolving industry standards can harm our operating results.

The semiconductor industry has historically been cyclical and periodically subject to significant economic downturns, characterized by diminished product demand, accelerated erosion of selling prices and overcapacity, as well as rapidly changing technology and evolving industry standards. In the future, we may experience substantial period-to-period fluctuations in our business and operating results due to general semiconductor industry conditions, overall economic conditions or other factors. Our business is also subject to the risks associated with the effects of legislation and regulations relating to the import or export of semiconductor products.

Recent domestic and worldwide economic conditions adversely affected and could have future adverse effects on our business, results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.

Our revenues and earnings have fluctuated significantly in the past and may fluctuate significantly in the future. General economic or other conditions could cause a downturn in the market for our products or technology. The 2008-2009 financial disruption affecting the banking system, investment banks, insurance companies and the financial markets negatively impacted general domestic and global economic conditions. These economic conditions resulted in our facing a very challenging period leading to reduced sales and earnings in fiscal 2009.

In 2011 and 2012, concerns over European sovereign debt and the ability of countries to borrow funds have again raised questions about the loan portfolios of large international banks, and low economic growth rates have increased the possibility of an economic downturn. There could be a number of effects on our business that could also adversely affect our operating results. Disruptions may result in the insolvency of key suppliers resulting in product delays; the inability of our customers to obtain credit to finance purchases of our products and/or customer insolvencies that cause our customers to change delivery schedules, cancel or reduce orders; a slowdown in global economies which could result in lower end-user demand for our products; and increased impairments of our investments. Net income could vary from expectations depending on the gains or losses realized on the sale or exchange of securities, gains or losses from equity method investments, and impairment charges related to goodwill, intangible assets, long-term assets, investments and marketable securities. Our cash and marketable securities investments represent significant assets that may be subject to fluctuating or even negative returns depending upon interest rate movements and financial market conditions in fixed income securities.

Volatility in the financial markets and overall economic uncertainty increases the risk of substantial quarterly and annual fluctuations in our earnings. Given the current economic environment, we remain cautious and we expect our customers to be cautious as well, which could affect our future results. If the economic recovery slows down or dissipates, our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows could be materially and adversely affected.

The complexity of our products makes us susceptible to manufacturing problems, which could increase our costs and delay our product shipments.

The manufacture and assembly of our products is highly complex and sensitive to a wide variety of factors, including:

34

·

the level of contaminants in the manufacturing environment;

·

impurities in the materials used; and

·

the performance of manufacturing personnel and production equipment.

In a typical semiconductor manufacturing process, silicon wafers produced by a foundry are cut into individual die. These die are assembled into individual packages and tested for performance. Our wafer fabrication suppliers have from time to time experienced lower than anticipated yields of suitable die. In the event of such decreased yields, we would incur additional costs to sort wafers, an increase in average cost per usable die and an increase in the time to market or availability of our products. These conditions could reduce our net revenues and gross margin and harm our customer relations.

We rely on independent manufacturers who may not be able to meet our manufacturing requirements.

We do not manufacture any of our IC products. Therefore, we are referred to in the semiconductor industry as a "fabless" producer. We depend upon third party foundries to produce wafers and subcontractors to manufacture IC products that meet our specifications. We currently have third party manufacturers located in China, Taiwan, Singapore, Malaysia, India, Korea and Japan that can produce products that meet our needs. However, as the industry continues to progress to smaller manufacturing and design geometries, the complexities of producing semiconductors will increase. Decreasing geometries may introduce new problems and delays that may affect product development and deliveries. Due to the nature of the industry and our status as a "fabless" IC semiconductor company, we could encounter fabrication-related problems that may affect the availability of our products, delay our shipments or increase our costs.

Our contracts with our wafer suppliers do not obligate them to a minimum supply or set prices. Any inability or unwillingness of our wafer suppliers generally, and GlobalFoundries, TSMC and MagnaChip in particular, to meet our manufacturing requirements would delay our production and product shipments and harm our business.

In recent years, we purchased over 70% of our wafers from MagnaChip, TSMC and GlobalFoundries, with the balance from other wafer suppliers. Our reliance on independent wafer suppliers to fabricate our wafers at their production facilities subjects us to possible risks such as:

·

lack of adequate capacity or assured product supply;

·

lack of available manufactured products;

·

reduced control over delivery schedules, quality assurance, manufacturing yields and production costs; and

·

unanticipated changes in wafer prices.

Any inability or unwillingness of our wafer suppliers to provide adequate quantities of finished wafers to meet our needs in a timely manner would delay our production and product shipments and seriously harm our business. In March 2004, GlobalFoundries shut down one of their production facilities used to manufacture our products. We transitioned the production of these products to different facilities. The transfer of production of our products to other facilities subjects us to the above listed risks as well as potential yield or other production problems, which could arise as a result of any change.

At present, we purchase wafers from our suppliers through the issuance of purchase orders based on our rolling nine-month forecasts. The purchase orders are subject to acceptance by each wafer supplier. We do not have long-term supply contracts that obligate our suppliers to a minimum supply or set prices. We also depend upon our wafer suppliers to participate in process improvement efforts, such as the transition to finer geometries. If our suppliers are unable or unwilling to do so, our development and introduction of new products could be delayed. Furthermore, sudden shortages of raw materials or production capacity constraints can lead wafer suppliers to allocate available capacity to customers other than us or for their internal uses, interrupting our ability to meet our product delivery obligations. Any significant interruption in our wafer supply would seriously harm our operating results and our customer relations. Our reliance on independent wafer suppliers may also lengthen the development cycle for our products, providing time-to-market advantages to our competitors that have in-house fabrication capacity.

35

In the event that our suppliers are unable or unwilling to manufacture our key products in required volumes, we will have to identify and qualify additional wafer foundries. The qualification process can take up to nine months or longer. Furthermore, we are unable to predict whether additional wafer foundries will become available to us or will be in a position to satisfy any of our requirements on a timely basis.

We depend on single or limited source assembly subcontractors with whom we do not have written contracts. Any inability or unwillingness of our assembly subcontractors to meet our assembly requirements would delay our product shipments and harm our business.

We primarily rely on foreign subcontractors for the assembly and packaging of our products and, to a lesser extent, for the testing of finished products. Some of these subcontractors are our single source supplier for some of our packages. In addition, changes in our or a subcontractor's business could cause us to become materially dependent on a single subcontractor. We have from time to time experienced difficulties in the timeliness and quality of product deliveries from our subcontractors and may experience similar or more severe difficulties in the future. We generally purchase these single or limited source components or services pursuant to purchase orders and have no guaranteed arrangements with these subcontractors. These subcontractors could cease to meet our requirements for components or services, or there could be a significant disruption in supplies from them, or degradation in the quality of components or services supplied by them. Any circumstance that would require us to qualify alternative supply sources could delay shipments, result in the loss of customers and limit or reduce our revenues. Introducing new products or transferring existing products to a new third party manufacturer or process may result in unforeseen product specification and operating problems. These problems may affect our shipments and may be costly to correct.

New regulations related to “conflict minerals” may force us to incur additional expenses, may result in damage to our business reputation and may adversely impact our ability to conduct our business.

In August 2012, under the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010, the SEC adopted new requirements for companies that use certain minerals and derivative metals (referred to as “conflict minerals,” regardless of their actual country of origin) in their products. Some of these metals are commonly used in electronic equipment and devices, including our products. These new requirements will require companies to investigate, disclose and report whether or not such metals originated from the Democratic Republic of Congo or adjoining countries. We have a complex supply chain for the components and parts used in each of our products. We have numerous foreign suppliers, many of whom are not obligated by the new law to investigate their own supply chains. As a result, we may incur significant costs to comply with the diligence and disclosure requirements, including costs related to determining the source of any of the relevant metals used in our products. In addition, because our supply chain is complex, we may not be able to sufficiently verify the origin of all the relevant metals used in our products through the due diligence procedures we implement, which may harm our business reputation. Though we do not anticipate that our customers will need to know our conflict mineral status to satisfy their own SEC reporting obligations (if any), we may also face difficulties in satisfying customers if they nonetheless require that we prove or certify that our products are “conflict free.” Key components and parts that can be shown to be “conflict free” may not be available to us in sufficient quantity, or at all, or may only be available at significantly higher cost to us. If we are not able to meet customer requirements, customers may choose to disqualify us as a supplier. Any of these outcomes could adversely impact our business, financial condition or operating results.

We may experience integration or other problems with potential future acquisitions, which could have an adverse effect on our business or results of operations. New acquisitions could dilute the interests of existing stockholders, and the announcement of new acquisitions could result in a decline in the price of our common stock.

Our previous and potential future acquisitions could result in the following:

·

large one-time write-offs;

·

the difficulty in integrating newly-acquired businesses and operations in an efficient and effective manner;

·

the challenges in achieving strategic objectives, cost savings, and other benefits from acquisitions as anticipated;

36

·

the risk of diverting the attention of senior management from other business concerns;

·

risks of entering geographic and business markets in which we have no or limited prior experience and potential loss of key employees of acquired organizations;

·

the risk that our markets do not evolve as anticipated and that the technologies and capabilities acquired do not prove to be those needed to be successful in those markets;

·

potentially dilutive issuances of equity securities;

·

excessive usages of cash;

·

the incurrence of debt and contingent liabilities or amortization expenses related to intangible assets;

·

difficulties in the assimilation of operations, personnel, technologies, products and the information systems of the acquired companies; and

·

difficulties in integrating or expanding information technology systems and other financial or business processes that may lead to financial reporting issues.

As part of our business strategy, we may seek acquisition prospects that would complement our existing product offerings, improve our market coverage or enhance our technological capabilities. In addition, from time to time, we invest in other companies, without actually acquiring them, and such investments involve many of the same risks as are involved with acquisitions.

Implementation of new Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) rules and the issuance of new corporate governance regulations or other accounting regulations, or reinterpretation of existing laws or regulations, could materially impact our business or stated results.

In general, from time to time the government, courts and the financial accounting boards may issue new corporate governance regulations or accounting regulations, or modify or reinterpret existing ones. There may be future changes in laws, interpretations or regulations that would affect our financial results or the way in which we present them. Additionally, changes in the laws or regulations could have adverse effects on hiring and many other aspects of our business that would affect our ability to compete, both nationally and internationally.

If we are unable to maintain processes and procedures to sustain effective internal control over our financial reporting, our ability to provide reliable and timely financial reports could be harmed and this could have a material adverse effect on our stock price.

Under the rules promulgated under Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, or Sarbanes-Oxley Act, we are required to maintain, and evaluate the effectiveness of, our internal control over financial reporting and disclosure controls and procedures. In our annual reports on Form 10-K for the years ended July 3, 2010, June 27, 2009, June 30, 2007 and July 2, 2005, we reported material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting. We have since remediated these deficiencies and continue to spend a significant amount of time and resources to ensure compliance with Section 404 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002. As reported in Item 9A of our most recent Form 10-K, our management does not believe that we had any material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting as of June 30, 2012, and management has determined that as of June 30, 2012, our internal control over financial reporting was effective. However, we have and will continue to evolve our business in a changing marketplace. In addition, we are expanding our overseas operations, and as we grow in these locations, we may have difficulty in recruiting and retaining a complement of personnel with an appropriate level of accounting knowledge, experience and training in the application of U.S. generally accepted accounting principles commensurate with our financial reporting requirements. Due to these factors, there can be no assurance that other material weaknesses or significant deficiencies will not arise in the future. Should we or our independent registered public accounting firm determine in future periods that we have a material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting, the reliability of our financial reports may be impacted, and investors could lose confidence in the accuracy and completeness of our financial reports, which could have an adverse effect on our stock price and we could suffer other materially adverse consequences.

Our finance department has undergone, and continues to undergo, significant changes.

In the past three years, we have undergone significant turnover of personnel in the finance department, including in significant positions. During fiscal 2010, we hired a new Chief Financial Officer and Corporate Controller. During fiscal 2011, we hired a new Accounting Manager and outsourced internal auditing activities to an independent consultant. There can be no assurance that these changes will improve

37

our finance functions, or that the finance personnel turnover we have experienced will not continue. In either event, the reliability of our financial reports may be impacted, and investors may lose confidence in the accuracy or completeness of our financial reports, which could have an adverse impact on our stock price.

Changes to environmental laws and regulations applicable to manufacturers of electrical and electronic equipment are causing us to redesign our products, and may increase our costs and expose us to liability.

The implementation of new environmental regulatory legal requirements, such as lead free initiatives, may affect our product designs and manufacturing processes. The impact of such regulations on our product designs and manufacturing processes could affect the timing of compliant product introductions as well as their commercial success. Redesigning our products to comply with new regulations may result in increased research and development and manufacturing and quality control costs. In addition, the products we manufacture that comply with new regulatory standards may not perform as well as our current products. Moreover, if we are unable to successfully and timely redesign existing products and introduce new products that meet new standards set by environmental regulation and our customers, sales of our products could decline, which could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We compete with others to attract and retain key personnel, and any loss of or inability to attract key personnel would harm us.

To a greater degree than non-technology companies, our future success will depend on the continued contributions of our executive officers and other key management and technical personnel. None of these individuals has an employment agreement with us and each one would be difficult to replace. We do not maintain any key person life insurance policies on any of these individuals. The loss of the services of one or more of our executive officers or key personnel or the inability to continue to attract qualified personnel could delay product development cycles or otherwise harm our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Our future success also will depend on our ability to attract and retain qualified technical, sales, marketing, finance and management personnel, particularly highly skilled design, process and test engineers, for whom competition can be intense. During strong business cycles, we expect to experience difficulty in filling our needs for qualified engineers and other personnel. If we do not succeed in hiring and retaining candidates with appropriate qualifications, our revenues, operations and product development efforts could be harmed.

Our limited ability to protect our intellectual property and proprietary rights could harm our competitive position. Litigation regarding intellectual property could divert management attention, be costly to defend and prevent us from using or selling the challenged technology.

Our success depends in part on our ability to obtain patents and licenses and preserve other intellectual property rights covering our products and development and testing tools. In the United States, we currently hold 104 patents covering certain aspects of our product designs and have nine additional patent applications pending. Copyrights, mask work protection, trade secrets and confidential technological know-how are also key to our business. Additional patents may not be issued to us or our patents or other intellectual property may not provide meaningful protection. We may be subject to, or initiate, interference proceedings in the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. These proceedings can consume significant financial and management resources. We may become involved in litigation relating to alleged infringement by us of others' patents or other intellectual property rights. This type of litigation is frequently expensive to both the winning party and the losing party and takes up significant amounts of management's time and attention. In addition, if we lose such a lawsuit, a court could require us to pay substantial damages and/or royalties or prohibit us from using essential technologies. For these and other reasons, this type of litigation could seriously harm our business. Also, although we may seek to obtain a license under a third party's intellectual property rights in order to bring an end to certain claims or actions asserted against us, we may not be able to obtain such a license on reasonable terms or at all.

Because it is important to our success that we are able to prevent competitors from copying our innovations, we intend to continue to seek patent, trade secret and mask work protection for our

38

technologies. The process of seeking patent protection can be long and expensive, and we cannot be certain that any currently pending or future applications will actually result in issued patents, or that, even if patents are issued, they will be of sufficient scope or strength to provide meaningful protection or any commercial advantage to us. Furthermore, others may develop technologies that are similar or superior to our technology or design around the patents we own.

We also rely on trade secret protection for our technology, in part through confidentiality agreements with our employees, consultants and third parties. However, these parties may breach these agreements. In addition, the laws of some territories in which we develop, manufacture or sell our products may not protect our intellectual property rights to the same extent as do the laws of the United States.

Our independent foundries use a process technology that may include technology we helped develop with them, that may generally be used by those foundries to produce their own products or to manufacture products for other companies, including our competitors. In addition, we may not have the right to implement key process technologies used to manufacture some of our products with foundries other than our present foundries.

We may not provide adequate allowances for exchanges, returns and concessions.

We recognize revenue from the sale of products when shipped, less an allowance based on future authorized and historical patterns of returns, price protection, exchanges and other concessions. We believe our methodology and approach are appropriate. However, if the actual amounts we incur exceed the allowances, it could decrease our revenue and corresponding gross profit.

Our future tax rates and tax payments could be higher than we anticipate and may harm our results of operations.

As a multinational corporation, we conduct our business in many countries and are subject to taxation in many jurisdictions. The taxation of our business is subject to the application of multiple and sometimes conflicting tax laws and regulations as well as multinational tax conventions. A number of factors, including unanticipated changes in the mix of earnings in countries with differing statutory tax rates or by unexpected changes in existing tax laws or our interpretation of them, could unfavorably affect our future effective tax rate. In the event our management determines it is no longer more likely than not that we will realize a portion of our deferred tax assets we will be required to increase our valuation allowance which will result in an increase in our effective tax rate. Furthermore, our tax returns are subject to examination in all the jurisdictions in which we operate which subjects us to potential increases in our tax liabilities. We are currently under examination of our federal tax returns for fiscal 2010 and 2011 by the Internal Revenue Service.

In addition, during the quarter ended December 29, 2012, we began implementation of an operating structure to more efficiently align the Company's transaction flows with the Company's geographic business operations. As a result we have formed new legal entities and begun realigning existing ones, completed the intercompany transfer of intellectual property rights, inventory and fixed assets across different tax jurisdictions, and implemented intercompany intellectual property licensing agreements between our U.S. and foreign entities. These changes may result in unanticipated changes to our tax rates and tax payments. All of these factors could have an adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

If our liability for U.S. and foreign taxes is greater than we have anticipated and reserved for, our operating results may suffer.

We are subject to taxation in the United States and in foreign jurisdictions in which we do business, including China. We believe that we have adequately estimated and reserved for our income tax liability. However, our effective tax rates may not be as low as we anticipate. Our business operations, including our transfer pricing for transactions among our various business entities operating in different tax jurisdictions, may be audited at any time by the U.S., Chinese or other foreign tax authorities.

A number of factors may adversely impact our future effective tax rates, such as:

·

changes in the tax laws of any of the countries in which we pay substantial taxes,

39

including changes to tax rates or to transfer pricing standards, or more fundamental changes such as the various proposals that exist from time to time for U.S. international tax reform;

·

changes in the valuation of our deferred tax assets and liabilities;

·

changes in U.S. general accepted accounting principles; and

·

the repatriation of non-U.S. earnings with respect to which we have not previously provided for U.S. taxes.

A change in our effective tax rate due to any of these factors may adversely impact our future results from operations. Also, changes in tax laws could have a material adverse effect on our ability to utilize cash in a tax efficient manner.

A large portion of our revenues is derived from sales to a few key customers, and the loss of one or more of our key customers, or their key end user customers, could significantly reduce our revenues. In addition, our sales through distributors increase the complexity of our business.

A relatively small number of key customers have accounted for a significant portion of our net revenues in each of the past several fiscal years. In general we expect this to continue for the foreseeable future. We had two direct customers who each accounted for more than 10% of net revenues during the nine months ended March 30, 2013. As a percentage of net revenues, sales to our top five direct customers during the nine months ended March 30, 2013 totaled 41%.

We do not have long-term sales agreements with any of our customers. Our customers are not subject to minimum purchase requirements, may reduce or delay orders periodically due to excess inventory and may discontinue purchasing our products at any time. Our distributors typically offer competing products in addition to ours. For the nine months ended March 30, 2013 and the fiscal year ended June 30, 2012, sales to our domestic and international distributors were approximately 67% of net revenues, as compared to approximately 69% of net revenues in the fiscal year ended July 2, 2011 and approximately 62% of net revenues in the fiscal year ended July 3, 2010. Distributors therefore continue to account for a significant portion of our sales. The loss of one or more significant customers, or the decision by a significant distributor to carry additional product lines of our competitors could decrease our revenues.

Selling through distributors increases the complexity of our business, requiring us to, among other matters:

· manage a more complex supply chain;

· manage the level of inventory at each distributor;

· provide for credits, return rights and price protection;

· estimate the impact of credits, return rights, price protection and unsold inventory at distributors; and

· monitor the financial condition and creditworthiness of our distributors.

Any failure to manage these challenges could cause us to inaccurately forecast sales and carry excess or insufficient inventory, thereby adversely affecting our operating results and cash flows.

Because we sell products in foreign markets and have operations outside of the United States, we face foreign business, political, economic and currency risks that could seriously harm us. Almost all of our wafer suppliers and assembly subcontractors are located in Southeast Asia, as are our FCP manufacturing facilities, which exposes us to the problems associated with international operations.

Risks associated with international business operations include the following:

·

disruptions or delays in shipments;

·

changes in economic conditions in the countries where these subcontractors are located;

·

currency fluctuations;

·

changes in political conditions;

·

potentially reduced protection for intellectual property;

·

foreign governmental regulatory requirements and unexpected changes in them;

·

the burdens of complying with a variety of foreign laws;

·

import and export controls;

40

·

delays resulting from difficulty in obtaining export licenses for technology; and

·

changes in tax laws, tariffs and other barriers, and freight rates.

Regulatory, geopolitical and other factors could seriously harm our business or require us to modify our current business practices. We are subject to general geopolitical risks in connection with our international operations, such as political and economic instability and changes in diplomatic and trade relationships. Although most of our products are sold in U.S. dollars, we incur a significant amount of certain types of expenses, such as payroll, utilities, capital equipment purchases and taxes in local currencies. The impact of currency exchange rate movements could harm our results and financial condition. In addition, changes in tariff and import regulations and in U.S. and non-U.S. monetary policies could harm our results and financial condition by increasing our expenses and reducing our revenue. Varying tax rates in different jurisdictions could harm our results of operations and financial condition by increasing our overall tax rate.

In the nine months ended March 30, 2013, we generated approximately 91% of our net revenues from sales in Asia and approximately 3% from sales outside of Asia and the United States. In fiscal year 2012, we generated approximately 92% of our net revenues from sales in Asia and approximately 3% from sales outside of Asia and the United States. In fiscal year 2011, we generated approximately 90% of our net revenues from sales in Asia and approximately 4% from sales outside of Asia and the United States. We expect that foreign sales will continue to represent a significant portion of net revenues. We intend to continue the expansion of our sales efforts outside the United States. This expansion will require significant management attention and financial resources and further subject us to international operating risks.

We have subsidiaries located in Asia. We manufacture some of our frequency control products in Taiwan as well as in the Jinan Development Zone in the Shandong Province of the PRC. The development of the Jinan facility depends upon various tax concessions, tax rebates and other support from the local governmental entity. There can be no assurance that the local governmental entity will not change their position regarding such tax and other support and such a change might adversely affect the successful completion and profitability of this facility.

We are expanding our presence in China with manufacturing and research and development activities. We will be subject to increased risks relating to foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations that could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and operating results. The value of the Chinese renminbi against the United States dollar and other currencies may fluctuate and is affected by, among other things, changes in China's political and economic conditions. Significant future appreciation of the renminbi could increase our component and other raw material costs as well as our labor costs, and could adversely affect our financial results. To the extent that we need to convert United States dollars into renminbi for our operations, appreciation of renminbi against the United States dollar could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Conversely, if we decide to convert our renminbi into United States dollars for other business purposes and the United States dollar appreciates against the renminbi, the United States dollar equivalent of the renminbi we convert would be reduced. The Chinese government recently announced that it is pegging the exchange rate of the renminbi against a number of currencies, rather than just the United States dollar. Fluctuations in the renminbi exchange rate could increase and could adversely affect our ability to operate our business.

In addition, there is a potential risk of conflict and further instability in the relationship between Taiwan and the People’s Republic of China (“PRC”). Conflict or instability could disrupt the operations of one of our principal wafer suppliers, several of our assembly subcontractors located in Taiwan, and our FCP manufacturing operations in Taiwan and the PRC.

Our operations and financial results could be severely harmed by natural disasters.

Our headquarters and some of our major suppliers' manufacturing facilities are located near major earthquake faults. In particular, our Asian operations and most of our third party service providers involved in the manufacturing of our products are located within relative close proximity. Therefore, any disaster that strikes within or close to that geographic area could be extremely disruptive to our business and could materially and adversely affect our operating results and financial condition.

One of the foundries we use is located in Taiwan, which suffered a severe earthquake during fiscal 2000. We did not experience significant disruption to our operations as a result of that earthquake. Taiwan is also

41

exposed to typhoons and tsunamis, which can affect not only foundries we rely upon but also our PSE-TW subsidiary. In March 2011, an earthquake and tsunami occurred off the northeast coast of Japan which disrupted the global supply chain for core materials manufactured in Japan that are incorporated in our products and manufacturing equipment. Thailand experienced floods in the quarter ended December 31, 2011, which interrupted the industry’s supply chain for storage products and impacted our sales as well. If a major earthquake, typhoon, tsunami or other natural disaster were to affect our operations or those of our suppliers, our product supply could be interrupted, which would seriously harm our business. Natural disasters could also affect the operations of the distributors and contract manufacturers we sell to, as well as the operations of our end use customers, which would adversely affect our operations and financial results. Natural disasters anywhere in the world may potentially adversely affect us by harming or causing interruptions to our supply chain or the supply chains of our suppliers, direct customers or end use customers.

RISKS RELATED TO THE SECURITIES MARKETS AND OWNERSHIP OF OUR COMMON STOCK

Our stock has been and will likely continue to be subject to substantial price and volume fluctuations due to a number of factors, many of which are beyond our control.

The trading price of our common stock has been and is likely to continue to be highly volatile. The securities markets have experienced significant price and volume fluctuations in the past, and the market prices of the securities of semiconductor companies have been especially volatile. This market volatility, as well as general economic, market or political conditions, including the current global economic situation, could reduce the market price of our common stock in spite of our operating performance. Our stock price could fluctuate widely in response to factors some of which are not within our control, including:

·

general conditions in the semiconductor and electronic systems industries;

·

actual or anticipated fluctuations in our operating results;

·

changes in expectations as to our future financial performance;

·

announcements of technological innovations or new products by us or our competitors;

·

changes in earnings estimates by analysts; and

·

price and volume fluctuations in the overall stock market, which have particularly affected the market prices of many high technology companies.

Our shareholder rights plan may adversely affect existing shareholders.

On March 6, 2012, we adopted a shareholder rights plan that may have the effect of deterring, delaying, or preventing a change in control that otherwise might be in the best interests of our shareholders. Under the rights plan, we declared a dividend of one preferred share purchase right for each share of our common stock held by shareholders of record as of March 6, 2012. Each right entitles shareholders, after the rights become exercisable, to purchase one one-thousandth of a share of our Series D Junior Participating Preferred Stock.

In general, the rights become exercisable when a person or group acquires 15% or more of our common stock or a tender offer for 15% or more of our common stock is announced or commenced. After such event, our other stockholders may purchase from us additional shares of our common stock at a 50% discount to the then-current market price. The rights will cause substantial dilution to a person or group that attempts to acquire us on terms not approved by our Board of Directors. The rights should not interfere with any merger or other business combination approved by our Board of Directors since the rights may be redeemed by us at $0.001 per right at any time before any person or group acquire 15% or more of our outstanding common stock. These rights expire in March 2022.

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

On April 29, 2008, our Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of $30 million worth of common stock, and on April 26, 2012, the Board authorized an additional share repurchase program for $25 million of common stock. We were authorized to repurchase the shares from time to time in the open market or private transactions, at the discretion of our management. The following table summarizes the stock repurchase activity during the three months ended March 30, 2013.

42

Period	Total Number of Shares Purchased		Average Price Paid per Share	Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs		Maximum $Value That May Yet be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs
January, 2013	462,475		7.01	462,475	$	20,630,182
February, 2013	—		—	—		20,630,182
March, 2013	147,164		7.10	147,164		19,585,494
Total	609,639	$	7.03	609,639	$	19,585,494

Current cash balances and the proceeds from stock option exercises and purchases in the stock purchase plan have funded stock repurchases in the past, and we expect to fund future stock repurchases from these same sources.

Item 6.

Exhibits.

Exhibit

Exhibit

Number

Description

31.1	Certification of Alex C. Hui, Chief Executive Officer, pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
31.2	Certification of Aaron Tachibana, Chief Financial Officer, pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
32.1	Certification of Alex C. Hui, Chief Executive Officer, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
32.2	Certification of Aaron Tachibana, Chief Financial Officer, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
101.INS*		XBRL Instance Document
101.SCH*		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
101.CAL*		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
101.DEF*		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document
101.LAB*		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
101.PRE*		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document

* XBRL (Extensible Business Reporting Language) information is furnished and not filed herewith, is not a part of a registration statement or Prospectus for purposes of sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933, is deemed not filed for purposes of section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and otherwise is not subject to liability under these sections.

43

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

Pericom Semiconductor Corporation

(Registrant)

Date:	May 2, 2013	By:	/s/ Alex C. Hui
			Alex C. Hui
			Chief Executive Officer
		By:	/s/ Aaron Tachibana
			Aaron Tachibana
			Chief Financial Officer

44

EX-31.1

EXHIBIT 31.1

PERICOM SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Alex C. Hui, certify that:

1.

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Pericom Semiconductor Corporation;

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.

The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)

Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally acceptable accounting principles;

c)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

d)

Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.

The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data; and

b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date:

May 2, 2013

/s/ Alex C. Hui

Alex C. Hui

Chief Executive Officer

Pericom Semiconductor Corporation

45

EX-31.2

EXHIBIT 31.2

PERICOM SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Aaron Tachibana, certify that:

1.

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Pericom Semiconductor Corporation;

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.

The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)

Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally acceptable accounting principles;

c)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

d)

Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.

The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data; and

b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date:

May 2, 2013

/s/ Aaron Tachibana

Aaron Tachibana

Chief Financial Officer

Pericom Semiconductor Corporation

46

EX-32.1

EXHIBIT 32.1

PERICOM SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with this quarterly report of Pericom Semiconductor Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 30, 2013 (the “Report”), I, Alex C. Hui, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated.

May 2, 2013
	By:	/s/ Alex C. Hui
		Alex C. Hui
		Chief Executive Officer
		Pericom Semiconductor Corporation

47

EX-32.2

EXHIBIT 32.2

PERICOM SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with this quarterly report of Pericom Semiconductor Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 30, 2013 (the “Report”), I, Aaron Tachibana, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated.

May 2, 2013

By:	/s/ Aaron Tachibana
	Aaron Tachibana
	Chief Financial Officer
	Pericom Semiconductor Corporation

48

XML

Income (Loss) Per Share (Details) (USD $) In Thousands, except Per Share data, unless otherwise specified	3 Months Ended		9 Months Ended
	Mar. 30, 2013	Mar. 31, 2012	Mar. 30, 2013	Mar. 31, 2012
Computation of basic and diluted income (loss) per share
Net loss	$ (681)	$ (267)	$ (4,828)	$ (157)
Computation of common shares outstanding - basic loss per share:
Weighted average shares of common stock	23,162	24,030	23,407	24,255
Basic Loss per share	$ (0.03)	$ (0.01)	$ (0.21)	$ (0.01)
Computation of common shares outstanding - diluted loss per share:
Weighted average shares of common stock	23,162	24,030	23,407	24,255
Dilutive shares using the treasury stock method
Shares used in computing diluted income (loss) per share	23,162	24,030	23,407	24,255
Diluted Loss per share	$ (0.03)	$ (0.01)	$ (0.21)	$ (0.01)

XML

Shareholders' Equity and Share-Based Compensation (Details 4) (USD $)	9 Months Ended
	Mar. 30, 2013
Summary of activity in employee stock purchase plan
Beginning Balance, Available	1,835,939
Purchase	(56,809)
Ending Balance, Available	1,779,130
Purchase, Weighted average price	$ 6.57

XML

Industry and Segment Information (Details Textual)	9 Months Ended
	Mar. 30, 2013 Segment
Industry and Segment Information (Textual)
Number of operating segments	3
Number of reportable segment	1

XML

Shareholders' Equity and Share-Based Compensation (Details 5) (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	3 Months Ended		9 Months Ended
	Mar. 30, 2013	Mar. 31, 2012	Mar. 30, 2013	Mar. 31, 2012
Share based compensation expenses classified by consolidated statement of operations
Pre-tax share-based compensation expense	$ 842	$ 927	$ 2,543	$ 2,833
Income tax impact	(277)	(41)	(838)	(689)
Net share-based compensation expense	565	886	1,705	2,144
Cost of revenues [Member]
Share based compensation expenses classified by consolidated statement of operations
Pre-tax share-based compensation expense	51	60	146	161
Research and development [Member]
Share based compensation expenses classified by consolidated statement of operations
Pre-tax share-based compensation expense	317	371	972	1,099
Selling, general and administrative [Member]
Share based compensation expenses classified by consolidated statement of operations
Pre-tax share-based compensation expense	$ 474	$ 496	$ 1,425	$ 1,573

XML

Industry and Segment Information (Details)	3 Months Ended		9 Months Ended
	Mar. 30, 2013	Mar. 31, 2012	Mar. 30, 2013	Mar. 31, 2012	Jun. 30, 2012
Summary of net revenues and accounts receivable in excess of 10 percent with any single customer
Entity-Wide Net Revenues, Major Customer, in excess of 10 Percentage	100.00%	100.00%	100.00%	100.00%
Entity - Wide Accounts Receivable, Major customer, in excess of 10 Percentage	100.00%		100.00%		100.00%
Customer A [Member]
Summary of net revenues and accounts receivable in excess of 10 percent with any single customer
Entity-Wide Net Revenues, Major Customer, in excess of 10 Percentage	24.00%	18.00%	19.00%	17.00%
Entity - Wide Accounts Receivable, Major customer, in excess of 10 Percentage	25.00%		25.00%		26.00%
Customer B [Member]
Summary of net revenues and accounts receivable in excess of 10 percent with any single customer
Entity-Wide Net Revenues, Major Customer, in excess of 10 Percentage	11.00%	14.00%	12.00%	14.00%
All others [Member]
Summary of net revenues and accounts receivable in excess of 10 percent with any single customer
Entity-Wide Net Revenues, Major Customer, in excess of 10 Percentage	65.00%	68.00%	69.00%	69.00%
Entity - Wide Accounts Receivable, Major customer, in excess of 10 Percentage	75.00%		75.00%		74.00%

XML

Fair Value Measurements (Tables)

9 Months Ended

Mar. 30, 2013

Fair Value Measurements [Abstract]

Fair value measurement

	As of March 30, 2013
(in thousands)	Fair Value		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
Investments (1)
Time deposits	$	16,448	$	—	$	16,448	$	—
US Treasury Securities		374		374		—		—
National government and agency securities		5,320		—		5,320		—
State and municipal bond obligations		3,193		—		3,193		—
Corporate bonds and notes		51,125		—		51,125		—
Asset backed securities		10,832		—		10,832		—
Mortgage backed securities		8,238		—		8,238		—
Total	$	95,530	$	374	$	95,156	$	—

(1)   $3,532 of the time deposits are included in cash and cash equivalents; the balance of the investments are included in short-term and long-term investments in marketable securities on our consolidated balance sheet.

XML

Shareholders' Equity and Share-Based Compensation (Details Textual) (USD $)	9 Months Ended		3 Months Ended	9 Months Ended
	Mar. 30, 2013	Mar. 30, 2013 Restricted Stock Units (RSUs) [Member]	Mar. 31, 2012 Stock option plan [Member]	Mar. 30, 2013 Stock option plan [Member] IncentivePlan	Mar. 30, 2013 2010 Employee stock purchase plan [Member]	Mar. 31, 2012 2010 Employee stock purchase plan [Member]
Shareholders' Equity and Share-Based Compensation (Textual)
Number of option plan				4
Reserve of common stock for issuance to employees, officers, directors, independent contractors and consultants				5,200,000	2,000,000
Option vesting period		4 years		48 months
Option expiration period				10 years
Stock options granted under the stock incentive plans	175,000
Option, weighted average grant date fair value					$ 1.77	$ 2.43
Shares available for future grant				1,600,000	1,800,000
Expected future compensation expense		$ 3,200,000		$ 1,300,000	$ 18,000
Weighted average period of recognition		2 years 6 months		2 years 3 months 18 days
Period for eligible employees to purchase common stock at a discount through payroll deductions					6 months
Purchase option for participants in purchase period					85% of the lower of the stock's fair market value on the first day and last day of the offering period.
Maximum number of common stock purchase by employee during offering period under plan					1,500
Maximum amount that can be accrued in offering period for stock purchased					$ 15,000,000
Common stock shares issued under Stock Purchase Plan					56,809	55,915
Weighted Average Exercise Price, granted	$ 8.54				$ 6.57	$ 7.22
Preferred stock, shares authorized	5,000,000
Preferred stock, shares issued	0
Restricted stock unit (RSU) convertible conversion ratio	one-for-one

XML

Income (Loss) Per Share (Tables)

9 Months Ended

Mar. 30, 2013

Income (Loss) Per Share [Abstract]

Computation of basic and diluted income (loss) per share

	Three Months Ended						Nine Months Ended
(in thousands, except per share data)	March 30, 2013			March 31, 2012			March 30, 2013			March 31, 2012
Net loss	$	(681	)	$	(267	)	$	(4,828	)	$	(157	)
Computation of common shares outstanding – basic loss per share:
Weighted average shares of common stock		23,162			24,030			23,407			24,255
Basic loss per share	$	(0.03	)	$	(0.01	)	$	(0.21	)	$	(0.01	)
Computation of common shares outstanding – diluted loss per share:
Weighted average shares of common stock		23,162			24,030			23,407			24,255
Dilutive shares using the treasury stock method		-			-			-			-
Shares used in computing diluted loss per share		23,162			24,030			23,407			24,255
Diluted loss per share	$	(0.03	)	$	(0.01	)	$	(0.21	)	$	(0.01	)

XML

Shareholders' Equity and Share-Based Compensation (Details) (Stock Option [Member])	3 Months Ended
	Mar. 30, 2013
Stock Option [Member]
Weighted average assumptions of stock options granted under its stock incentive plans
Expected life	5 years 10 months 24 days
Risk-free interest rate	1.13%
Volatility	54.00%
Dividend yield

XML

Inventories (Details Textual) (USD $) In Millions, unless otherwise specified	9 Months Ended
	Mar. 30, 2013	Jun. 30, 2012
Inventories (Textual)
Raw material inventory reserves, Description	The Company considers raw material inventory obsolete and reserves it if the raw material has not moved in 365 days.
Description of inventory assembled devices	The Company reviews its assembled devices for excess and records a reserve if the quantity of assembled devices in inventory is in excess of the greater of the quantity shipped in the previous twelve months, the quantity in backlog or the quantity forecasted to be shipped in the following twelve months. In certain circumstances, management will determine, based on expected usage or other factors, that inventory considered excess by these guidelines should not be reserved. The Company does occasionally determine that the last twelve months' sales levels will not continue and reserves inventory in line with the quantity forecasted.
Inventory reserved	$ 3.3	$ 3.8

XML

Goodwill and Intangible Assets (Details 2) (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	Mar. 30, 2013	Jun. 30, 2012
Summary of future amortization expense associated with intangible assets
Next 12 Months	$ 2,990
13-24 Months	2,848
25-36 Months	2,848
37-48 Months	1,490
49-60 Months
Over 60 Months
Finite lived intangible assets, Net	10,176	12,431
Customer relationships [Member]
Summary of future amortization expense associated with intangible assets
Next 12 Months	970
13-24 Months	970
25-36 Months	970
37-48 Months	406
49-60 Months
Over 60 Months
Finite lived intangible assets, Net	3,316	4,018
Core developed technology [Member]
Summary of future amortization expense associated with intangible assets
Next 12 Months	2,020
13-24 Months	1,878
25-36 Months	1,878
37-48 Months	1,084
49-60 Months
Over 60 Months
Finite lived intangible assets, Net	$ 6,860	$ 8,412

XML

Shareholders' Equity and Share-Based Compensation (Details 2) (USD $)	9 Months Ended
	Mar. 30, 2013
Exercise price range one [Member]
Schedule of options outstanding and exercisable
Range of exercise price, lower range limit	$ 4.89
Range of exercise price, Upper range limit	$ 8.03
Exercise price range, Number of outstanding options	500,000
Exercise price range outstanding options, Weighted average remaining contractual term	4 years 11 months 26 days
Exercise price range outstanding options, Number average exercise price	$ 7.72
Exercise price range exercisable options, Number exercisable	399,000
Exercise price range exercisable options, Weighted average exercise price	$ 7.73
Exercise price range two [Member]
Schedule of options outstanding and exercisable
Range of exercise price, lower range limit	$ 8.10
Range of exercise price, Upper range limit	$ 8.85
Exercise price range, Number of outstanding options	582,000
Exercise price range outstanding options, Weighted average remaining contractual term	5 years 1 month 20 days
Exercise price range outstanding options, Number average exercise price	$ 8.52
Exercise price range exercisable options, Number exercisable	410,000
Exercise price range exercisable options, Weighted average exercise price	$ 8.45
Exercise price range three [Member]
Schedule of options outstanding and exercisable
Range of exercise price, lower range limit	$ 8.86
Range of exercise price, Upper range limit	$ 10.01
Exercise price range, Number of outstanding options	497,000
Exercise price range outstanding options, Weighted average remaining contractual term	5 years 3 months 7 days
Exercise price range outstanding options, Number average exercise price	$ 9.74
Exercise price range exercisable options, Number exercisable	435,000
Exercise price range exercisable options, Weighted average exercise price	$ 9.71
Exercise price range four [Member]
Schedule of options outstanding and exercisable
Range of exercise price, lower range limit	$ 10.15
Range of exercise price, Upper range limit	$ 14.57
Exercise price range, Number of outstanding options	494,000
Exercise price range outstanding options, Weighted average remaining contractual term	3 years 8 months 16 days
Exercise price range outstanding options, Number average exercise price	$ 11.00
Exercise price range exercisable options, Number exercisable	474,000
Exercise price range exercisable options, Weighted average exercise price	$ 10.98
Exercise price range five [Member]
Schedule of options outstanding and exercisable
Range of exercise price, lower range limit	$ 14.68
Range of exercise price, Upper range limit	$ 18.10
Exercise price range, Number of outstanding options	392,000
Exercise price range outstanding options, Weighted average remaining contractual term	4 years 11 months 8 days
Exercise price range outstanding options, Number average exercise price	$ 15.87
Exercise price range exercisable options, Number exercisable	392,000
Exercise price range exercisable options, Weighted average exercise price	$ 15.87
Exercise price range six [Member]
Schedule of options outstanding and exercisable
Range of exercise price, lower range limit	$ 4.89
Range of exercise price, Upper range limit	$ 18.10
Exercise price range, Number of outstanding options	2,465,000
Exercise price range outstanding options, Weighted average remaining contractual term	4 years 9 months 25 days
Exercise price range outstanding options, Number average exercise price	$ 10.27
Exercise price range exercisable options, Number exercisable	2,110,000
Exercise price range exercisable options, Weighted average exercise price	$ 10.52

XML

Investments in Marketable Securities (Details Textual) (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	9 Months Ended
	Mar. 30, 2013	Mar. 31, 2012
Investments in Marketable Securities (Textual)
Proceeds from maturities and sales of available-for-sale investments	$ 89,127	$ 76,749
Gain on sale of investments	$ 852	$ 556

XML

Equity and Comprehensive Income (Details) (USD $)	Mar. 30, 2013	Jun. 30, 2012
Equity and Comprehensive Income (Textual)
Accumulated other comprehensive income	$ 10,296,000	$ 9,579,000
Unrealized gains on available-for-sale investments net of tax	346,000
Accumulated currency translation gains included in accumulated other comprehensive income	$ 10,000,000

XML

Industry and Segment Information (Details 1) (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	3 Months Ended		9 Months Ended
	Mar. 30, 2013	Mar. 31, 2012	Mar. 30, 2013	Mar. 31, 2012	Jun. 30, 2012
Schedule of net sales and net book value of long-lived assets by geographical segment
Total net revenues	$ 30,366	$ 33,378	$ 97,548	$ 99,191
Total long-lived assets	60,329		60,329		56,102
China (including Hong Kong) [Member]
Schedule of net sales and net book value of long-lived assets by geographical segment
Total net revenues	15,459	11,543	45,549	34,422
Total long-lived assets	35,567		35,567		37,761
Taiwan [Member]
Schedule of net sales and net book value of long-lived assets by geographical segment
Total net revenues	8,635	15,227	33,721	45,232
Total long-lived assets	14,831		14,831		15,005
United States [Member]
Schedule of net sales and net book value of long-lived assets by geographical segment
Total net revenues	1,969	2,010	5,008	5,670
Total long-lived assets	9,092		9,092		2,304
Korea [Member]
Schedule of net sales and net book value of long-lived assets by geographical segment
Total long-lived assets	579		579		650
Others (less than 10% each) [Member]
Schedule of net sales and net book value of long-lived assets by geographical segment
Total net revenues	4,303	4,598	13,270	13,867
Total long-lived assets	$ 260		$ 260		$ 382

XML

Income (Loss) Per Share

9 Months Ended

Mar. 30, 2013

Income (Loss) Per Share [Abstract]

INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE

3. INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE

Basic income (loss) per share is based upon the weighted average number of common shares outstanding. Diluted income (loss) per share reflects the additional potential dilution that could occur if securities or other contracts to issue common stock were exercised or converted into common stock.

Basic and diluted loss per share for the three and nine month periods ended March 30, 2013 and March 31, 2012 are computed as follows:

	Three Months Ended						Nine Months Ended
(in thousands, except per share data)	March 30, 2013			March 31, 2012			March 30, 2013			March 31, 2012
Net loss	$	(681	)	$	(267	)	$	(4,828	)	$	(157	)
Computation of common shares outstanding – basic loss per share:
Weighted average shares of common stock		23,162			24,030			23,407			24,255
Basic loss per share	$	(0.03	)	$	(0.01	)	$	(0.21	)	$	(0.01	)
Computation of common shares outstanding – diluted loss per share:
Weighted average shares of common stock		23,162			24,030			23,407			24,255
Dilutive shares using the treasury stock method		-			-			-			-
Shares used in computing diluted loss per share		23,162			24,030			23,407			24,255
Diluted loss per share	$	(0.03	)	$	(0.01	)	$	(0.21	)	$	(0.01	)

Options to purchase 2,465,000 and 2,497,000 shares of common stock, and restricted stock units of 562,000 and 596,000 were outstanding during the three and nine months ended March 30, 2013 respectively, but not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share because the options and units would be anti-dilutive under the treasury stock method. Options to purchase 2,611,000 and 2,724,000 shares of common stock, and restricted stock units of 518,000 and 548,000 were outstanding during the three and nine months ended March 31, 2012 respectively, but not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share because the options and units would be anti-dilutive under the treasury stock method. As the Company incurred a net loss for the three and nine months ended March 30, 2013 and March 31, 2012, diluted loss per share is the same as basic loss per share since the addition of any contingently issuable shares would be anti-dilutive.

XML

Short-Term Debt (Details) (USD $)	9 Months Ended
	Mar. 30, 2013
Short-Term Debt (Textual)
Interest rate on short-term borrowings	1.06%
Maturity period of short-term borrowings, Maximum	151 days
Maturity period of short-term borrowings, Minimum	116 days
Value of assets pledged as collateral	$ 4,300,000
PSE-TW [Member]
Short-Term Debt (Textual)
Short-term borrowings	$ 197,000

XML

Accrued Liabilities (Details) (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	Mar. 30, 2013	Jun. 30, 2012
Schedule of accrued liabilities
Accrued compensation	$ 5,886	$ 5,886
Income taxes payable	1,016	2
Sales commissions	371	497
Accrued construction liabilities	172	845
Other accrued expenses	1,537	1,378
Total accrued liabilities	$ 8,982	$ 8,608

XML

Industry and Segment Information (Tables)

9 Months Ended

Mar. 30, 2013

Industry and Segment Information [Abstract]

Summary of net revenues and accounts receivable in excess of 10 percent with any single customer

	Net Revenues
	Three Months Ended							Nine Months Ended
	March 30, 2013			March 31, 2012				March 30, 2013			March 31, 2012
Customer A		24	%			18	%		19	%		17	%
Customer B		11	%			14	%		12	%		14	%
All others		65	%			68	%		69	%		69	%
		100	%			100	%		100	%		100	%
	Accounts Receivable
	March 30, 2013				June 30, 2012
Customer A		25	%			26	%
All others		75	%			74	%
		100	%			100	%

Schedule of net revenues and net book value of long-lived assets by geographical segment

	Net Revenues
	Three Months Ended				Nine Months Ended
(in thousands)	March 30, 2013		March 31, 2012		March 30, 2013		March 31, 2012
China (including Hong Kong)	$	15,459	$	11,543	$	45,549	$	34,422
Taiwan		8,635		15,227		33,721		45,232
United States		1,969		2,010		5,008		5,670
Other (less than 10% each)		4,303		4,598		13,270		13,867
Total net revenues	$	30,366	$	33,378	$	97,548	$	99,191

(in thousands)	March 30, 2013		June 30, 2012
China (including Hong Kong)	$	35,567	$	37,761
Taiwan		14,831		15,005
United States		9,092		2,304
Korea		579		650
Others (less than 10% each)		260		382
Total long-lived assets	$	60,329	$	56,102

XML

Commitments and Contingencies (Tables)

9 Months Ended

Mar. 30, 2013

Commitments and Contingencies [Abstract]

Future minimum commitments

	Months from March 30, 2013
(in thousands)	Less than 12 Months		12-24 Months		24-36 Months		36-48 Months		48-60 Months		Total
Short-term debt	$	197	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	197
Operating lease payments		1,282		229		42		2		—		1,555
Capital equipment purchase commitments		11		—		—		—		—		11
Facility modifications		657		—		—		—		—		657
Total	$	2,147	$	229	$	42	$	2	$	—	$	2,420

XML

Shareholders' Equity and Share-Based Compensation (Details 6) (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	3 Months Ended		9 Months Ended
	Mar. 30, 2013	Mar. 31, 2012	Mar. 30, 2013	Mar. 31, 2012
Share-based compensation by type of award
Stock options	$ 265	$ 304	$ 803	$ 1,074
Restricted stock units	523	549	1,578	1,556
Stock purchase plan	54	74	162	203
Total share-based compensation expense	$ 842	$ 927	$ 2,543	$ 2,833

XML

Commitments and Contingencies (Details) (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	Mar. 30, 2013
Future minimum commitments
Less than 12 Months	$ 2,147
12-24 Months	229
24-36 Months	42
36-48 Months	2
48-60 Months
Total	2,420
Short-term debt [Member]
Future minimum commitments
Less than 12 Months	197
12-24 Months
24-36 Months
36-48 Months
48-60 Months
Total	197
Operating lease payments [Member]
Future minimum commitments
Less than 12 Months	1,282
12-24 Months	229
24-36 Months	42
36-48 Months	2
48-60 Months
Total	1,555
Capital equipment purchase commitments [Member]
Future minimum commitments
Less than 12 Months	11
12-24 Months
24-36 Months
36-48 Months
48-60 Months
Total	11
Facility modifications [Member]
Future minimum commitments
Less than 12 Months	657
12-24 Months
24-36 Months
36-48 Months
48-60 Months
Total	$ 657

XML

Shareholders' Equity and Share-Based Compensation (Tables)

9 Months Ended

Mar. 30, 2013

Shareholder's Equity and Share-Based Compensation [Abstract]

Weighted average assumptions of stock options granted under its stock incentive plans

	Three Months Ended
	March 30, 2013
Expected Life	5.9 years
Risk-free interest rate		1.13	%
Volatility		54	%
Dividend Yield		—

Schedule of stock option activity

	Shares			Weighted Average Exercise Price		Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Term		Aggregate Intrinsic Value
	(in thousands)					(years)		(in thousands)
Options outstanding at June 30, 2012		2,453		$	10.34		5.12	$	912
Granted		175			8.54
Exercised		(6	)		7.87
Cancelled or expired		(157	)		9.58
Options outstanding at March 30, 2013		2,465		$	10.27		4.82	$	25
Options vested and expected to vest at March 30, 2013		2,433		$	10.29		4.76	$	25
Options exercisable at March 30, 2013		2,110		$	10.52		4.21	$	25

Schedule of options outstanding and exercisable

				Options Outstanding						Exercisable Options
	Range of Exercise Prices			Number Outstanding as of March 30, 2013		Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Term (years)		Weighted Average Exercise Price		Number Exercisable as of March 30, 2013		Weighted Average Exercise Price
$	4.89	$	8.03		500,000		4.99	$	7.72		399,000	$	7.73
	8.10		8.85		582,000		5.14		8.52		410,000		8.45
	8.86		10.01		497,000		5.27		9.74		435,000		9.71
	10.15		14.57		494,000		3.71		11.00		474,000		10.98
	14.68		18.10		392,000		4.94		15.87		392,000		15.87
$	4.89	$	18.10		2,465,000		4.82	$	10.27		2,110,000	$	10.52

Summary of activity of restricted stock units (RSUs)

	Shares			Weighted Average Award Date Fair Value		Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Term		Aggregate Intrinsic Value
	(in thousands)					(years)		(in thousands)
RSUs outstanding at June 30, 2012		504		$	9.06		1.42	$	4,535
Awarded		277			7.81
Released		(160	)		9.52
Forfeited		(59	)		8.26
RSUs outstanding at March 30, 2013		562		$	8.39		1.54	$	3,969
RSUs expected to vest after March 30, 2013		496		$	8.43		1.45	$	3,505

Summary of activity in employee stock purchase plan

	Shares			Weighted Average Purchase Price
Beginning Available		1,835,939
Purchases		(56,809	)	$	6.57
Ending Available		1,779,130

Share based compensation expenses classified by consolidated statement of operations

	Three Months Ended						Nine Months Ended
(In thousands)	March 30, 2013			March 31, 2012			March 30, 2013			March 31, 2012
Cost of revenues	$	51		$	60		$	146		$	161
Research and development		317			371			972			1,099
Selling, general and administrative		474			496			1,425			1,573
Pre-tax share-based compensation expense		842			927			2,543			2,833
Income tax impact		(277	)		(41	)		(838	)		(689	)
Net share-based compensation expense	$	565		$	886		$	1,705		$	2,144

Share-based compensation by type of award

	Three Months Ended				Nine Months Ended
(In thousands)	March 30, 2013		March 31, 2012		March 30, 2013		March 31, 2012
Stock options	$	265	$	304	$	803	$	1,074
Restricted stock units		523		549		1,578		1,556
Stock purchase plan		54		74		162		203
Total share-based compensation expense	$	842	$	927	$	2,543	$	2,833

XML

Investments in Unconsolidated Affiliate (Tables)

9 Months Ended

Mar. 30, 2013

Investments In Unconsolidated Affiliate [Abstract]

Investment in unconsolidated affiliate

(in thousands)	March 30, 2013		June 30, 2012
Jiyuan Crystal Photoelectric Frequency Technology Ltd.	$	2,390	$	2,474

XML

Goodwill and Intangible Assets

9 Months Ended

Mar. 30, 2013

Goodwill and Intangible Assets [Abstract]

GOODWILL AND INTANGIBLE ASSETS

2. GOODWILL AND INTANGIBLE ASSETS

The following table summarizes the activity related to the carrying value of the Company’s goodwill during the nine months ended March 30, 2013:

(In thousands)
Goodwill at June 30, 2012	$	16,797
Currency translation adjustments		104
Goodwill at March 30, 2013	$	16,901

Goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price of an acquired business over the fair value of the underlying net tangible and intangible assets.

The following table summarizes the components of other intangible assets and related accumulated amortization balances for each of the period-ending dates shown, which were recorded as a result of business combinations:

	March 30, 2013							June 30, 2012
(in thousands)	Gross		Accumulated Amortization			Net		Gross		Accumulated Amortization			Net
Customer relationships	$	5,943	$	(2,627	)	$	3,316	$	5,906	$	(1,888	)	$	4,018
eCERA trade name		44		(44	)		—		44		(43	)		1
Core developed technology		13,189		(6,329	)		6,860		13,110		(4,698	)		8,412
Total amortizable purchased intangible assets		19,176		(9,000	)		10,176		19,060		(6,629	)		12,431
SaRonix trade name		402		—			402		400		—			400
Total purchased intangible assets	$	19,578	$	(9,000	)	$	10,578	$	19,460	$	(6,629	)	$	12,831

Amortization expense related to finite-lived purchased intangible assets was approximately $775,000 and $2.3 million for the three and nine month periods ended March 30, 2013 and $778,000 and $2.4 million for the three and nine month periods ended March 31, 2012, respectively. Amortization of intangible assets for the nine month period ended March 31, 2012 included accelerated amortization related to a supplier relationship of approximately $125,000 and subsequent asset write-off.

The Company performs an impairment review of its intangible assets at least annually. Based on the results of its most recent impairment review, the Company determined that no impairment of its intangible assets existed as of June 30, 2012. However, future impairment reviews could result in a charge to earnings.

The finite-lived purchased intangible assets consist of supplier and customer relationships, trade names and existing and core technology, which have remaining useful lives from one to five years. The Company expects future amortization expense associated with its intangible assets to be:

	Months from March 30, 2013
(in thousands)	Next 12 Months		13-24 Months		25-36 Months		37-48 Months		49-60 Months		Over 60 Months		Total
Customer relationships	$	970	$	970	$	970	$	406	$	—	$	—	$	3,316
Core developed technology		2,020		1,878		1,878		1,084		—		—		6,860
	$	2,990	$	2,848	$	2,848	$	1,490	$	—	$	—	$	10,176

XML

Investments in Marketable Securities (Tables)

9 Months Ended

Mar. 30, 2013

Investments In Marketable Securities [Abstract]

Summary of investments by major security type

	As of March 30, 2013
(in thousands)	Amortized Cost		Unrealized Gains		Unrealized Losses			Net Unrealized Gains (Losses)		Fair Market Value
Available-for-Sale Securities
Time deposits	$	12,916	$	—	$	—		$	—	$	12,916
US Treasury securities		373		1		—			1		374
National government and agency securities		5,184		136		—			136		5,320
State and municipal bond obligations		3,175		19		(1	)		18		3,193
Corporate bonds and notes		50,780		414		(69	)		345		51,125
Asset backed securities		10,805		42		(15	)		27		10,832
Mortgage backed securities		8,203		78		(43	)		35		8,238
Total	$	91,436	$	690	$	(128	)	$	562	$	91,998

	As of June 30, 2012
(in thousands)	Amortized Cost		Unrealized Gains		Unrealized Losses			Net Unrealized Gains (Losses)			Fair Value
Available-for-Sale Securities
Time deposits	$	10,344	$	—	$	—		$	—		$	10,344
US Treasury securities		3,639		—		(5	)		(5	)		3,634
National government and agency securities		6,582		167		—			167			6,749
State and municipal bond obligations		1,772		1		(1	)		—			1,772
Corporate bonds and notes		61,374		461		(197	)		264			61,638
Asset backed securities		10,148		19		(86	)		(67	)		10,081
Mortgage backed securities		9,313		98		(77	)		21			9,334
Total	$	103,172	$	746	$	(366	)	$	380		$	103,552

Gross unrealized losses and fair market values of the Company's investments

	Continuous Unrealized Losses at March 30, 2013
	Less Than 12 Months					12 Months or Longer						Total
(In thousands)	Fair Market Value		Unrealized Losses			Fair Market Value			Unrealized Losses			Fair Market Value			Unrealized Losses
National government and agency securities	$	141		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	141		$	—
State and municipal bond obligations		1,186			1			—			—			1,186			1
Corporate bonds and notes		7,782			22			2,338			47			10,120			69
Asset backed securities		4,578			8			730			7			5,308			15
Mortgage backed securities		2,190			6			228			37			2,418			43
	$	15,877		$	37		$	3,296		$	91		$	19,173		$	128
	Continuous Unrealized Losses at June 30, 2012
	Less Than 12 Months						12 Months or Longer						Total
(in thousands)	Fair Value			Unrealized Losses			Fair Value			Unrealized Losses			Fair Value			Unrealized Losses
US Treasury securities	$	3,434		$	5		$	—		$	—		$	3,434		$	5
National government and agency securities		327			—			—			—			327			—
State and municipal bond obligations		1,033			1			—			—			1,033			1
Corporate bonds and notes		12,117			85			3,782			112			15,899			197
Asset backed securities		1,784			15			1,595			71			3,379			86
Mortgage backed securities		659			—			403			77			1,062			77
	$	19,354		$	106		$	5,780		$	260		$	25,134		$	366

Fair market value of short and long-term investments

(in thousands)	March 30, 2013
Contractual Maturities
Less than 12 months	$	8,600
One to three years		30,464
Over three years		43,889
Multiple dates		9,045
Total	$	91,998

XML

Income (Loss) Per Share (Details Textual)	3 Months Ended		9 Months Ended
	Mar. 30, 2013	Mar. 31, 2012	Mar. 30, 2013	Mar. 31, 2012
Common stock [Member]
Income (loss) Per Share (Textual)
Number of shares excluded from the computation of diluted net earnings per share	2,465,000	2,611,000	2,497,000	2,724,000
Restricted stock [Member]
Income (loss) Per Share (Textual)
Number of shares excluded from the computation of diluted net earnings per share	562,000	518,000	596,000	548,000

XML

Shareholders' Equity and Share-Based Compensation (Details 3) (Restricted Stock Units (RSUs) [Member], USD $) In Thousands, except Per Share data, unless otherwise specified	9 Months Ended	12 Months Ended
	Mar. 30, 2013	Jun. 30, 2012
Restricted Stock Units (RSUs) [Member]
Summary of activity of restricted stock units (RSUs)
RSUs outstanding, Beginning balance	504
Awarded	277
Released	(160)
Forfeited	(59)
RSUs outstanding, Balance	562	504
RSUs outstanding, Weighted average award date fair value, Beginning balance	$ 9.06
Awarded, Weighted average award date fair value	$ 7.81
Realeased, Weighted average award date fair value	$ 9.52
Forfeited, Weighted average award date fair value	$ 8.26
RSUs outstanding, Weighted average award date fair value, Balance	$ 8.39	$ 9.06
RSUs outstanding, Weighted average remaining contractual term	1 year 6 months 14 days	1 year 5 months 1 day
RSUs outstanding, Aggregate intrinsic value, Beginning balance	$ 4,535
RSUs outstanding, Aggregate intrinsic value, Ending balance	3,969	4,535
RSUs expected to vest after March 30, 2013	496
RSUs expected to vest after March 30, 2013, Weighted Average Award Date Fair Value	$ 8.43
RSUs expected to vest after December 29, 2012, Weighted average remaining contractual term	1 year 5 months 12 days
RSUs expected to vest after December 29, 2012, Aggregate intrinsic value	$ 3,505

XML

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets (Unaudited) (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	Mar. 30, 2013		Jun. 30, 2012
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$ 27,193		$ 24,283
Short-term investments in marketable securities	65,432		79,924
Accounts receivable
Trade (net of reserves and allowances of $2,541 and $2,566)	20,739		24,010
Other receivables	3,133		3,674
Inventories	13,874		16,604
Prepaid expenses and other current assets	2,708		2,425
Deferred income taxes	1,564		1,549
Total current assets	134,643		152,469
Property, plant and equipment - net	60,329		56,102
Investments in unconsolidated affiliates	2,390		2,474
Deferred income taxes - non-current	2,416		2,447
Long-term investments in marketable securities	26,566		23,628
Goodwill	16,901		16,797
Intangible assets (net of accumulated amortization of $8,997 and $6,629)	10,578		12,831
Other assets	8,643		9,058
Total assets	262,466		275,806
Current liabilities:
Short-term debt	197		1,364
Accounts payable	10,203		14,860
Accrued liabilities	8,982		8,608
Total current liabilities	19,382		24,832
Industrial development subsidy	7,385		8,577
Deferred income taxes	5,888		6,191
Other long-term liabilities	3,428		2,571
Total liabilities	36,083		42,171
Commitments and contingencies (Note 6)		[1]		[1]
Shareholders' equity:
Common stock and paid in capital - no par value, 60,000,000 shares authorized; shares issued and outstanding: March 30, 2013, 22,941,000; June 30, 2012, 23,565,000	120,222		123,362
Retained earnings	95,865		100,694
Accumulated other comprehensive income, net of tax	10,296		9,579
Total shareholders' equity	226,383		233,635
Total liabilities and shareholders' equity	$ 262,466		$ 275,806

[1] (Note 6)

XML

Commitments and Contingencies (Details Textual)	9 Months Ended
	Mar. 30, 2013
Commitments and Contingencies (Textual)
Corporate headquarters lease commitment expiration year	2013

XML

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited) (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	9 Months Ended
	Mar. 30, 2013	Mar. 31, 2012
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net loss	$ (4,828)	$ (157)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization	8,364	8,959
Share-based compensation	2,543	2,833
Tax benefit resulting from stock option transactions	431	382
Excess tax benefit resulting from stock option transactions	(3)	(4)
Write-off of receivables		300
Gain on sale of investments	(852)	(556)
Write-off of property and equipment	244	292
Equity in net income of unconsolidated affiliates	(186)	(83)
Deferred taxes	(328)	(56)
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable	3,925	8,203
Inventories	2,882	4,617
Prepaid expenses and other current assets	178	(1,962)
Other assets	48	75
Accounts payable	(4,743)	(451)
Accrued liabilities	(590)	(2,401)
Other long-term liabilities	349	41
Net cash provided by operating activities	7,434	20,032
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Purchase of property, plant and equipment	(10,753)	(5,108)
Purchase of available-for-sale investments	(76,805)	(84,080)
Maturities and sales of available-for-sale investments	89,127	76,749
Acquisition of PTI, net of cash acquired		(8,076)
Change in restricted cash balance		2,947
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities	1,569	(17,568)
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Proceeds from common stock issuance under stock plans	420	525
Proceeds from short-term debt	3,877	10,743
Payments on short-term debt	(5,088)	(15,206)
Excess tax benefit resulting from stock option transactions	3	4
Repurchase of common stock	(6,115)	(9,223)
Net cash used in financing activities	(6,903)	(13,157)
EFFECT OF EXCHANGE RATE CHANGES ON CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS	810	493
NET CHANGE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS	2,910	(10,200)
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS:
Beginning of period	24,283	30,023
End of period	$ 27,193	$ 19,823

XML

Investment in Unconsolidated Affiliate (Details) (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	Mar. 30, 2013	Jun. 30, 2012
Investment in unconsolidated affiliate
Jiyuan Crystal Photoelectric Frequency Technology Ltd.	$ 2,390	$ 2,474

XML

Goodwill and Intangible Assets (Details) (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	9 Months Ended
	Mar. 30, 2013
Schedule of goodwill
Beginning balance	$ 16,797
Currency translation adjustments	104
Ending balance	$ 16,901

XML

Investments in Marketable Securities (Details 1) (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	Mar. 30, 2013	Jun. 30, 2012
Gross unrealized losses and fair market values of the Company's investments
Less Than 12 Months, Fair Value	$ 15,877	$ 19,354
Less Than 12 Months, Unrealized Losses	37	106
12 Months or Longer, Fair Value	3,296	5,780
12 Months or Longer, Unrealized Losses	91	260
Total, Fair Value	19,173	25,134
Total, Unrealized Losses	128	366
US Treasury Securities [Member]
Gross unrealized losses and fair market values of the Company's investments
Less Than 12 Months, Fair Value		3,434
Less Than 12 Months, Unrealized Losses		5
12 Months or Longer, Fair Value
12 Months or Longer, Unrealized Losses
Total, Fair Value		3,434
Total, Unrealized Losses		5
National government and agency securities [Member]
Gross unrealized losses and fair market values of the Company's investments
Less Than 12 Months, Fair Value	141	327
Less Than 12 Months, Unrealized Losses
12 Months or Longer, Fair Value
12 Months or Longer, Unrealized Losses
Total, Fair Value	141	327
Total, Unrealized Losses
State and municipal bond obligations [Member]
Gross unrealized losses and fair market values of the Company's investments
Less Than 12 Months, Fair Value	1,186	1,033
Less Than 12 Months, Unrealized Losses	1	1
12 Months or Longer, Fair Value
12 Months or Longer, Unrealized Losses
Total, Fair Value	1,186	1,033
Total, Unrealized Losses	1	1
Corporate bonds and notes [Member]
Gross unrealized losses and fair market values of the Company's investments
Less Than 12 Months, Fair Value	7,782	12,117
Less Than 12 Months, Unrealized Losses	22	85
12 Months or Longer, Fair Value	2,338	3,782
12 Months or Longer, Unrealized Losses	47	112
Total, Fair Value	10,120	15,899
Total, Unrealized Losses	69	197
Asset backed Securities [Member]
Gross unrealized losses and fair market values of the Company's investments
Less Than 12 Months, Fair Value	4,578	1,784
Less Than 12 Months, Unrealized Losses	8	15
12 Months or Longer, Fair Value	730	1,595
12 Months or Longer, Unrealized Losses	7	71
Total, Fair Value	5,308	3,379
Total, Unrealized Losses	15	86
Mortgage backed securities [Member]
Gross unrealized losses and fair market values of the Company's investments
Less Than 12 Months, Fair Value	2,190	659
Less Than 12 Months, Unrealized Losses	6
12 Months or Longer, Fair Value	228	403
12 Months or Longer, Unrealized Losses	37	77
Total, Fair Value	2,418	1,062
Total, Unrealized Losses	$ 43	$ 77

XML

Fair Value Measurements

9 Months Ended

Mar. 30, 2013

Fair Value Measurements [Abstract]

FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

16. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

The Company defines fair value as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. Valuation techniques used to measure fair value must maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs. The standard describes a fair value hierarchy based on three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value, of which the first two are considered observable and the last is considered unobservable:

● Level 1 - Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.

● Level 2 - Inputs other than Level 1 that are observable, either directly or indirectly, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities.

● Level 3 - Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities.

The following table represents the Company’s fair value hierarchy for financial assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis. All of the investments except US Treasury securities are classified as Level 2 at March 30, 2013. Level 2 pricing is provided by third party sources of market information obtained through the Company’s investment advisors. The Company does not adjust for or apply any additional assumptions or estimates to the pricing information it receives from advisors. The Company’s investment advisors obtain pricing data from independent sources, such as Standard & Poor’s, Bloomberg and Interactive Data Corporation, and rely on comparable pricing of other securities because the Level 2 securities it holds are not actively traded and have fewer observable transactions. The Company considers this the most reliable information available for the valuation of the securities.

The Company’s Level 2 securities include time deposits, government securities, corporate debt securities and mortgage-backed and asset-backed securities. Government securities include US federal agency securities, foreign government and agency securities, and US state and municipal bond obligations. Many of the municipal bonds are insured; those that are not are nearly all AAA/Aaa rated. The corporate debt securities are all investment grade and most are single A-rated or better. The asset-backed securities are AAA/Aaa rated and are backed by auto loans, student loans, credit card balances and residential or commercial mortgages.

	As of March 30, 2013
(in thousands)	Fair Value		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
Investments (1)
Time deposits	$	16,448	$	—	$	16,448	$	—
US Treasury Securities		374		374		—		—
National government and agency securities		5,320		—		5,320		—
State and municipal bond obligations		3,193		—		3,193		—
Corporate bonds and notes		51,125		—		51,125		—
Asset backed securities		10,832		—		10,832		—
Mortgage backed securities		8,238		—		8,238		—
Total	$	95,530	$	374	$	95,156	$	—

(1)   $3,532 of the time deposits are included in cash and cash equivalents; the balance of the investments are included in short-term and long-term investments in marketable securities on our consolidated balance sheet.

The Company had no transfers into or out of Level 2 during the nine months ended March 30, 2013.

When assessing marketable securities for other-than-temporary declines in value, a number of factors are considered. Analyses of the severity and duration of price declines, remaining years to maturity, portfolio manager reports, economic forecasts, and the specific circumstances of issuers indicate that it is reasonable to expect marketable securities with unrealized losses at March 30, 2013 to recover in fair value up to the Company’s cost bases within a reasonable period of time. The Company does not intend to sell investments with unrealized losses before maturity, when the obligors are required to redeem them at full face value or par. The Company believes the obligors have the financial resources to redeem the debt securities. Accordingly, the Company does not consider the investments to be other-than-temporarily impaired at March 30, 2013.

The Company has determined that the amounts reported for cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, deposits, accounts payable, accrued liabilities and debt approximate fair value because of their short maturities and/or variable interest rates.

XML

Goodwill and Intangible Assets (Details 1) (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	Mar. 30, 2013	Jun. 30, 2012
Summary of components of other intangible assets and related accumulated amortization as part of business combinations
Finite lived intangible assets. Gross	$ 19,176	$ 19,060
Finite lived intangible assets, Accumulated Amortization	(8,997)	(6,629)
Finite lived intangible assets, Net	10,176	12,431
Purchased intangible assets, Gross	19,578	19,460
Purchased intangible assets, Accumulated Amortization	(9,000)	(6,629)
Purchased intangible assets, Net	10,578	12,831
SaRonix trade name [Member]
Summary of components of other intangible assets and related accumulated amortization as part of business combinations
Indefinite lived intangible assets, Gross	402	400
Indefinite lived intangible assets, Accumulated Amortization
Indefinite lived intangible assets, Net	402	400
Customer relationships [Member]
Summary of components of other intangible assets and related accumulated amortization as part of business combinations
Finite lived intangible assets. Gross	5,943	5,906
Finite lived intangible assets, Accumulated Amortization	(2,627)	(1,888)
Finite lived intangible assets, Net	3,316	4,018
eCERA trade name [Member]
Summary of components of other intangible assets and related accumulated amortization as part of business combinations
Finite lived intangible assets. Gross	44	44
Finite lived intangible assets, Accumulated Amortization	(44)	(43)
Finite lived intangible assets, Net		1
Core developed technology [Member]
Summary of components of other intangible assets and related accumulated amortization as part of business combinations
Finite lived intangible assets. Gross	13,189	13,110
Finite lived intangible assets, Accumulated Amortization	(6,329)	(4,698)
Finite lived intangible assets, Net	$ 6,860	$ 8,412

XML

Goodwill and Intangible Assets (Tables)

9 Months Ended

Mar. 30, 2013

Goodwill and Intangible Assets [Abstract]

Schedule of goodwill

(In thousands)
Goodwill at June 30, 2012	$	16,797
Currency translation adjustments		104
Goodwill at March 30, 2013	$	16,901

Summary of components of other intangible assets and related accumulated amortization as part of business combinations

	March 30, 2013							June 30, 2012
(in thousands)	Gross		Accumulated Amortization			Net		Gross		Accumulated Amortization			Net
Customer relationships	$	5,943	$	(2,627	)	$	3,316	$	5,906	$	(1,888	)	$	4,018
eCERA trade name		44		(44	)		—		44		(43	)		1
Core developed technology		13,189		(6,329	)		6,860		13,110		(4,698	)		8,412
Total amortizable purchased intangible assets		19,176		(9,000	)		10,176		19,060		(6,629	)		12,431
SaRonix trade name		402		—			402		400		—			400
Total purchased intangible assets	$	19,578	$	(9,000	)	$	10,578	$	19,460	$	(6,629	)	$	12,831

Summary of future amortization expense associated with intangible assets

	Months from March 30, 2013
(in thousands)	Next 12 Months		13-24 Months		25-36 Months		37-48 Months		49-60 Months		Over 60 Months		Total
Customer relationships	$	970	$	970	$	970	$	406	$	—	$	—	$	3,316
Core developed technology		2,020		1,878		1,878		1,084		—		—		6,860
	$	2,990	$	2,848	$	2,848	$	1,490	$	—	$	—	$	10,176

XML

Fair Value Measurements (Details) (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	Mar. 30, 2013
Fair value measurement
Total	$ 95,530
Time deposits [Member]
Fair value measurement
Total	16,448
US Treasury Securities [Member]
Fair value measurement
Total	374
National government and agency securities [Member]
Fair value measurement
Total	5,320
State and municipal bond obligations [Member]
Fair value measurement
Total	3,193
Corporate bonds and notes [Member]
Fair value measurement
Total	51,125
Asset backed Securities [Member]
Fair value measurement
Total	10,832
Mortgage backed securities [Member]
Fair value measurement
Total	8,238
Level 1 [Member]
Fair value measurement
Total	374
Level 1 [Member] | Time deposits [Member]
Fair value measurement
Total
Level 1 [Member] | US Treasury Securities [Member]
Fair value measurement
Total	374
Level 1 [Member] | National government and agency securities [Member]
Fair value measurement
Total
Level 1 [Member] | State and municipal bond obligations [Member]
Fair value measurement
Total
Level 1 [Member] | Corporate bonds and notes [Member]
Fair value measurement
Total
Level 1 [Member] | Asset backed Securities [Member]
Fair value measurement
Total
Level 1 [Member] | Mortgage backed securities [Member]
Fair value measurement
Total
Level 2 [Member]
Fair value measurement
Total	95,156
Level 2 [Member] | Time deposits [Member]
Fair value measurement
Total	16,448
Level 2 [Member] | US Treasury Securities [Member]
Fair value measurement
Total
Level 2 [Member] | National government and agency securities [Member]
Fair value measurement
Total	5,320
Level 2 [Member] | State and municipal bond obligations [Member]
Fair value measurement
Total	3,193
Level 2 [Member] | Corporate bonds and notes [Member]
Fair value measurement
Total	51,125
Level 2 [Member] | Asset backed Securities [Member]
Fair value measurement
Total	10,832
Level 2 [Member] | Mortgage backed securities [Member]
Fair value measurement
Total	8,238
Level 3 [Member]
Fair value measurement
Total
Level 3 [Member] | Time deposits [Member]
Fair value measurement
Total
Level 3 [Member] | US Treasury Securities [Member]
Fair value measurement
Total
Level 3 [Member] | National government and agency securities [Member]
Fair value measurement
Total
Level 3 [Member] | State and municipal bond obligations [Member]
Fair value measurement
Total
Level 3 [Member] | Corporate bonds and notes [Member]
Fair value measurement
Total
Level 3 [Member] | Asset backed Securities [Member]
Fair value measurement
Total
Level 3 [Member] | Mortgage backed securities [Member]
Fair value measurement
Total

XML

Basis of Presentation

9 Months Ended

Mar. 30, 2013

Basis Of Presentation [Abstract]

BASIS OF PRESENTATION

1. BASIS OF PRESENTATION

The condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared by Pericom Semiconductor Corporation (“Pericom” or the “Company”) pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. In the opinion of management, these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements include all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments and accruals, necessary for a fair presentation of the Company’s financial position as of March 30, 2013, the results of operations for the three and nine months ended March 30, 2013 and March 31, 2012 and cash flows for the nine months ended March 30, 2013 and March 31, 2012. This unaudited quarterly information should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements of Pericom and the notes thereto included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 31, 2012.

The preparation of the interim condensed consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities as of the date of the interim condensed consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the period. Actual amounts could differ from these estimates. The results of operations for the three and nine months ended March 30, 2013 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the entire year. The three and nine month periods ended March 30, 2013 and March 31, 2012 each had 13 and 39 week periods, respectively.

The Company participates in a dynamic high technology industry and believes that changes in any of the following areas could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s future financial position or results of operations: advances and trends in new technologies; competitive pressures in the form of new products or price reductions on current products; changes in the overall demand for products offered by the Company; changes in customer relationships; acquisitions and the subsequent integration of the acquired entity with the Company; litigation or claims against the Company based on intellectual property, patent, product, regulatory or other factors; risks associated with changes in domestic and international economic and/or political conditions or regulations and environmental laws; availability of necessary components; interruptions at wafer suppliers and subcontractors; fluctuations in currencies given the Company’s sales and operations being heavily weighted and paid in foreign currencies; and the Company’s ability to attract and retain employees necessary to support its growth.

These interim condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Pericom Semiconductor Corporation and its wholly owned subsidiaries, Pericom Global Limited (“PGL”), PSE Technology Corporation (“PSE-TW”), and Pericom Asia Limited (“PAL”). PGL has two wholly-owned subsidiaries, Pericom International Limited (“PIL”) and Pericom Semiconductor (HK) Limited (“P­HK”). In addition, PAL has three subsidiaries, PSE Technology (Shandong) Corporation ("PSE-SD") and Pericom Technology Yangzhou Corporation (“PSC-YZ”) for the Jinan, China and Yangzhou, China operations, respectively, and Pericom Technology Inc. (“PTI”). The Company eliminates all intercompany balances and transactions in consolidation.

FISCAL PERIOD – For purposes of reporting the financial results, the Company’s fiscal years end on the Saturday closest to the end of June. The year ended June 30, 2012 is referred to as fiscal year 2012 or fiscal 2012, whereas the current fiscal year 2013 or fiscal 2013 will end on June 29, 2013. Both fiscal 2012 and fiscal 2013 contain 52 weeks or 364 days. Periodically, the Company adds a 53rd week to a year in order to end that year on the Saturday closest to the end of June.

WARRANTY – The Company offers a standard one-year product replacement warranty. In the past, the Company has not had to accrue for a general warranty reserve, but assesses the level and materiality of return material authorizations (“RMA”s) and determines whether it is appropriate to accrue for estimated returns of defective products at the time revenue is recognized. On occasion, management may determine to accept product returns beyond the standard one-year warranty period. In those instances, the Company accrues for the estimated cost at the time management decides to accept the return. Because of the Company’s standardized manufacturing processes and product testing procedures, returns of defective product are infrequent and the quantities have not been significant. Accordingly, historical warranty costs have not been material.

RECENTLY ISSUED ACCOUNTING STANDARDS

In July 2012, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") No. 2012-02, Topic 350 - Intangibles - Goodwill and Other, which amends Topic 350 to allow an entity to first assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of an indefinite-lived intangible asset is less than its carrying value. An entity is not required to determine the fair value of the indefinite-lived intangible unless the entity determines, based on the qualitative assessment, that it is more likely than not that its fair value is less than the carrying value. This standard is effective for annual and interim impairment tests performed for fiscal years beginning after September 15, 2012 and early adoption is permitted. The Company does not expect the adoption will have an impact on the Company’s consolidated results of operations or financial condition.

In February 2013, the FASB issued ASU No. 2013-02, Reporting of Amounts Reclassified Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income. This guidance is the culmination of the FASB’s deliberation on reporting reclassification adjustments from accumulated other comprehensive income (AOCI). The amendments in ASU 2013-02 do not change the current requirements for reporting net income or other comprehensive income. However, the amendments require disclosure of amounts reclassified out of AOCI in its entirety, by component, on the face of the statement of operations or in the notes thereto. Amounts that are not required to be reclassified in their entirety to net income must be cross referenced to other disclosures that provide additional detail. This standard is effective prospectively for annual and interim reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2012. The adoption of ASU 2013-02 did not have an impact on the Company’s financial statements.

XML

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets (Unaudited) (Parenthetical) (USD $) In Thousands, except Share data, unless otherwise specified	Mar. 30, 2013	Jun. 30, 2012
Balance Sheets [Abstract]
Allowances for accounts receivable	$ 2,541	$ 2,566
Accumulated amortization on intangible assets	$ 8,997	$ 6,629
Common stock and paid in capital, no par value (in dollars per share)
Common stock and paid in capital, shares authorized	60,000,000	60,000,000
Common stock and paid in capital, shares issued	22,941,000	23,565,000
Common stock and paid in capital, shares outstanding	22,941,000	23,565,000

XML

Investment in Unconsolidated Affiliate

9 Months Ended

Mar. 30, 2013

Investments In Unconsolidated Affiliate [Abstract]

INVESTMENT IN UNCONSOLIDATED AFFILIATE

11. INVESTMENT IN UNCONSOLIDATED AFFILIATE

The Company’s investment in an unconsolidated affiliate is as follows:

(in thousands)	March 30, 2013		June 30, 2012
Jiyuan Crystal Photoelectric Frequency Technology Ltd.	$	2,390	$	2,474

PSE-TW has a 49% equity interest in Jiyuan Crystal Photoelectric Frequency Technology Ltd. (“JCP”), an FCP manufacturing company located in Science Park of Jiyuan City, Henan Province, China. JCP is a key manufacturing partner of PSE-TW and supplies PSE-TW with blanks for its surface mount device (“SMD”) production lines. For the first nine months of fiscal 2013 and 2012, the Company’s allocated portion of JCP’s results was income of $186,000 and $83,000, respectively.

XML

Document and Entity Information	9 Months Ended
	Mar. 30, 2013	May 01, 2013
Document and Entity Information [Abstract]
Entity Registrant Name	PERICOM SEMICONDUCTOR CORP
Entity Central Index Key	0001001426
Amendment Flag	false
Current Fiscal Year End Date	--06-29
Document Type	10-Q
Document Period End Date	Mar. 30, 2013
Document Fiscal Year Focus	2013
Document Fiscal Period Focus	Q3
Entity Filer Category	Accelerated Filer
Entity Common Stock, Shares Outstanding		22,941,000

XML

Equity and Comprehensive Income

9 Months Ended

Mar. 30, 2013

Stock Repurchase Program and Equity and Comprehensive Income [Abstract]

EQUITY AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

12. EQUITY AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

Comprehensive income consists of net income, changes in net unrealized gains (losses) on available-for-sale investments and changes in cumulative currency translation adjustments at consolidated subsidiaries. As of March 30, 2013, accumulated other comprehensive income of $10.3 million is made up of $346,000 of unrealized gains on available-for-sale investments, net of tax, and $10.0 million of accumulated currency translation gains.

XML

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations (Unaudited) (USD $) In Thousands, except Per Share data, unless otherwise specified	3 Months Ended		9 Months Ended
	Mar. 30, 2013	Mar. 31, 2012	Mar. 30, 2013	Mar. 31, 2012
Statements Of Operations [Abstract]
Net revenues	$ 30,366	$ 33,378	$ 97,548	$ 99,191
Cost of revenues	19,521	21,789	61,597	64,088
Gross profit	10,845	11,589	35,951	35,103
Operating expenses:
Research and development	5,277	5,669	15,697	16,262
Selling, general and administrative	7,193	7,114	22,364	21,513
Total operating expenses	12,470	12,783	38,061	37,775
Loss from operations	(1,625)	(1,194)	(2,110)	(2,672)
Interest and other income, net	1,318	847	2,748	2,555
Income (loss) before income taxes	(307)	(347)	638	(117)
Income tax expense (benefit)	395	(76)	5,652	123
Loss from consolidated companies	(702)	(271)	(5,014)	(240)
Equity in net income of unconsolidated affiliates	21	4	186	83
Net loss	$ (681)	$ (267)	$ (4,828)	$ (157)
Basic Loss per share	$ (0.03)	$ (0.01)	$ (0.21)	$ (0.01)
Diluted Loss per share	$ (0.03)	$ (0.01)	$ (0.21)	$ (0.01)
Shares used in computing basic loss per share	23,162	24,030	23,407	24,255
Shares used in computing diluted loss per share	23,162	24,030	23,407	24,255

XML

Commitments and Contingencies

9 Months Ended

Mar. 30, 2013

Commitments and Contingencies [Abstract]

COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

6. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

The Company’s future minimum commitments at March 30, 2013 are as follows:

	Months from March 30, 2013
(in thousands)	Less than 12 Months		12-24 Months		24-36 Months		36-48 Months		48-60 Months		Total
Short-term debt	$	197	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	197
Operating lease payments		1,282		229		42		2		—		1,555
Capital equipment purchase commitments		11		—		—		—		—		11
Facility modifications		657		—		—		—		—		657
Total	$	2,147	$	229	$	42	$	2	$	—	$	2,420

The operating lease commitments are primarily the lease on the Company’s corporate headquarters, which expires in 2013.

The Company has no purchase obligations other than routine purchase orders and the capital equipment purchase commitments and facility modifications shown in the table as of March 30, 2013.

The Company previously entered into an R&D Agreement for its Yangzhou facility that required capital injections. During the quarter ended March 30, 2013, the Company was notified by the Administration for Industry and Commerce that its capital injections have been approved and the requirements of the R&D Agreement have been satisfied.

XML

Accrued Liabilities

9 Months Ended

Mar. 30, 2013

Accrued Liabilities [Abstract]

ACCRUED LIABILITIES

5. ACCRUED LIABILITIES

Accrued liabilities consist of:

(in thousands)	March 30, 2013		June 30, 2012
Accrued compensation	$	5,886	$	5,886
Income taxes payable		1,016		2
Sales commissions		371		497
Accrued construction liabilities		172		845
Other accrued expenses		1,537		1,378
	$	8,982	$	8,608

XML

Basis of Presentation (Policies)

9 Months Ended

Mar. 30, 2013

Basis Of Presentation [Abstract]

FISCAL PERIOD

FISCAL PERIOD – For purposes of reporting the financial results, the Company’s fiscal years end on the Saturday closest to the end of June. The year ended June 30, 2012 is referred to as fiscal year 2012 or fiscal 2012, whereas the current fiscal year 2013 or fiscal 2013 will end on June 29, 2013. Both fiscal 2012 and fiscal 2013 contain 52 weeks or 364 days. Periodically, the Company adds a 53rd week to a year in order to end that year on the Saturday closest to the end of June.

WARRANTY

WARRANTY – The Company offers a standard one-year product replacement warranty. In the past, the Company has not had to accrue for a general warranty reserve, but assesses the level and materiality of return material authorizations (“RMA”s) and determines whether it is appropriate to accrue for estimated returns of defective products at the time revenue is recognized. On occasion, management may determine to accept product returns beyond the standard one-year warranty period. In those instances, the Company accrues for the estimated cost at the time management decides to accept the return. Because of the Company’s standardized manufacturing processes and product testing procedures, returns of defective product are infrequent and the quantities have not been significant. Accordingly, historical warranty costs have not been material.

Intangibles - Goodwill and Other ASU No. 2012-02

In July 2012, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") No. 2012-02, Topic 350 - Intangibles - Goodwill and Other, which amends Topic 350 to allow an entity to first assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of an indefinite-lived intangible asset is less than its carrying value. An entity is not required to determine the fair value of the indefinite-lived intangible unless the entity determines, based on the qualitative assessment, that it is more likely than not that its fair value is less than the carrying value. This standard is effective for annual and interim impairment tests performed for fiscal years beginning after September 15, 2012 and early adoption is permitted. The Company does not expect the adoption will have an impact on the Company’s consolidated results of operations or financial condition.

ASU No. 2013-02, Reporting of Amounts Reclassified Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income

In February 2013, the FASB issued ASU No. 2013-02, Reporting of Amounts Reclassified Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income. This guidance is the culmination of the FASB’s deliberation on reporting reclassification adjustments from accumulated other comprehensive income (AOCI). The amendments in ASU 2013-02 do not change the current requirements for reporting net income or other comprehensive income. However, the amendments require disclosure of amounts reclassified out of AOCI in its entirety, by component, on the face of the statement of operations or in the notes thereto. Amounts that are not required to be reclassified in their entirety to net income must be cross referenced to other disclosures that provide additional detail. This standard is effective prospectively for annual and interim reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2012. The adoption of ASU 2013-02 did not have an impact on the Company’s financial statements.

XML

Short-Term Debt

9 Months Ended

Mar. 30, 2013

Short-Term Debt [Abstract]

SHORT-TERM DEBT

13. SHORT-TERM DEBT

As of March 30, 2013, the Company’s subsidiary PSE-TW has made short-term borrowings under its credit facilities totaling approximately $197,000. The loans are denominated in Japanese Yen and carry variable rates of interest currently at 1.06% per annum. The loans have maturities ranging from 116 to 151 days. PSE-TW has pledged $4.3 million in land and buildings for the loan and credit facilities.

XML

Shareholders' Equity and Share-Based Compensation

9 Months Ended

Mar. 30, 2013

Shareholder's Equity and Share-Based Compensation [Abstract]

SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY AND SHARE-BASED COMPENSATION

9. SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY AND SHARE-BASED COMPENSATION

PREFERRED STOCK

The Company’s shareholders have authorized the Board of Directors to issue 5,000,000 shares of preferred stock from time to time in one or more series and to fix the rights, privileges and restrictions of each series. As of March 30, 2013, the Company has issued no shares of preferred stock.

STOCK OPTION PLANS

At March 30, 2013 the Company had four stock incentive plans and an employee stock purchase plan, consisting of the 1995 Stock Option Plan, 2001 Stock Option Plan, SaRonix Acquisition Stock Option Plan, 2004 Stock Incentive Plan and the 2010 Employee Stock Purchase Plan.

Under the four stock incentive plans, the Company has reserved an aggregate of 5.2 million shares of common stock as of March 30, 2013 for issuance to employees, officers, directors, independent contractors and consultants of the Company in the form of incentive or nonqualified stock options, or grants of restricted stock.

The Company may grant stock options at the fair value on the grant date for incentive stock options and nonqualified stock options. Options vest over periods of generally 48 months as determined by the Board of Directors. Options granted under the Plans expire 10 years from the grant date.

The Company estimates the fair value of each employee stock option on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option valuation model and expenses that value as compensation using a straight-line method over the option’s vesting period, which corresponds to the requisite employee service period. The Company estimates expected stock price volatility based on actual historical volatility for periods that the Company believes represent predictors of future volatility. The Company uses historical data to estimate option exercises, expected option holding periods and option forfeitures. The Company bases the risk-free interest rate for periods within the contractual life of the option on the U.S. Treasury yield corresponding to the expected life of the underlying option.

The value of the Company’s stock options granted under its stock incentive plans during the three months ended March 30, 2013 was estimated at the date of grant using the following weighted average assumptions:

	Three Months Ended
	March 30, 2013
Expected Life	5.9 years
Risk-free interest rate		1.13	%
Volatility		54	%
Dividend Yield		—

No stock options were granted under the stock incentive plans during the three months ended March 31, 2012.

The following table summarizes the Company’s stock option activity for the nine months ended March 30, 2013:

	Shares			Weighted Average Exercise Price		Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Term		Aggregate Intrinsic Value
	(in thousands)					(years)		(in thousands)
Options outstanding at June 30, 2012		2,453		$	10.34		5.12	$	912
Granted		175			8.54
Exercised		(6	)		7.87
Cancelled or expired		(157	)		9.58
Options outstanding at March 30, 2013		2,465		$	10.27		4.82	$	25
Options vested and expected to vest at March 30, 2013		2,433		$	10.29		4.76	$	25
Options exercisable at March 30, 2013		2,110		$	10.52		4.21	$	25

At March 30, 2013, 1.6 million shares were available for future grants under the incentive plans. The aggregate intrinsic value of options exercised during the nine months ended March 30, 2013 was not significant.

At March 30, 2013, expected future compensation expense relating to options outstanding is $1.3 million, which will be amortized to expense over a weighted average period of 2.3 years.

Additional information regarding options outstanding and exercisable as of March 30, 2013 is as follows:

				Options Outstanding						Exercisable Options
	Range of Exercise Prices			Number Outstanding as of March 30, 2013		Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Term (years)		Weighted Average Exercise Price		Number Exercisable as of March 30, 2013		Weighted Average Exercise Price
$	4.89	$	8.03		500,000		4.99	$	7.72		399,000	$	7.73
	8.10		8.85		582,000		5.14		8.52		410,000		8.45
	8.86		10.01		497,000		5.27		9.74		435,000		9.71
	10.15		14.57		494,000		3.71		11.00		474,000		10.98
	14.68		18.10		392,000		4.94		15.87		392,000		15.87
$	4.89	$	18.10		2,465,000		4.82	$	10.27		2,110,000	$	10.52

Restricted Stock Units

Restricted stock units (“RSUs”) are converted into shares of the Company’s common stock upon vesting on a one-for-one basis. Typically, vesting of RSUs is subject to the employee’s continuing service to the Company. RSUs generally vest over a period of 4 years and are expensed ratably on a straight-line basis over their respective vesting period net of estimated forfeitures. The fair value of RSUs granted pursuant to the Company’s 2004 Stock Incentive Plan is the product of the number of shares granted and the grant date fair value of the common stock. A summary of activity of RSUs for the nine months ended March 30, 2013 is presented below:

	Shares			Weighted Average Award Date Fair Value		Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Term		Aggregate Intrinsic Value
	(in thousands)					(years)		(in thousands)
RSUs outstanding at June 30, 2012		504		$	9.06		1.42	$	4,535
Awarded		277			7.81
Released		(160	)		9.52
Forfeited		(59	)		8.26
RSUs outstanding at March 30, 2013		562		$	8.39		1.54	$	3,969
RSUs expected to vest after March 30, 2013		496		$	8.43		1.45	$	3,505

At March 30, 2013, expected future compensation expense relating to RSUs is $3.2 million, which will be amortized to expense over a weighted average remaining recognition period of 2.5 years.

2010 EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN

The Company’s 2010 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the “Stock Purchase Plan”) allows eligible employees of the Company to purchase shares of Common Stock through payroll deductions. The Company reserved 2.0 million shares of the Company’s Common Stock for issuance under this Plan, of which 1.8 million remain available at March 30, 2013. The Stock Purchase Plan permits eligible employees to purchase Common Stock at a discount through payroll deductions during six-month purchase periods. The six-month periods come to an end on or about May 1 and November 1 and the purchases are then made. Thus there were no purchases under the Stock Purchase Plan for the three months ended March 30, 2013 and March 31, 2012. Participants in the Stock Purchase Plan may purchase stock at 85% of the lower of the stock’s fair market value on the first day and last day of the offering period. The maximum number of shares of Common Stock that any employee may purchase during any offering period under the plan is 1,500 shares, and an employee may not accrue more than $15,000 for share purchases in any offering period.During the first nine months of fiscal years 2013 and 2012, the Company issued 56,809 and 55,915 shares of common stock under the Stock Purchase Plan at weighted average prices of $6.57 and $7.22, respectively. The weighted average fair value of the awards for the first nine months of fiscal 2013 and 2012 were $1.77 and $2.43 per share, respectively.

The Company estimates the fair value of stock purchase rights granted under the Company’s Stock Purchase Plan on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option valuation model. ASC Topic 718 states that a “lookback” pricing provision with a share limit should be considered a combination of stock and a call option. The valuation results for these elements have been combined to value the specific features of the stock purchase rights. The Company bases volatility on the expected volatility of the Company’s stock during the offering period. The expected term is determined by the time from enrollment until purchase, and the Company uses the U.S. Treasury yield for the risk-free interest rate for the offering period.

The following table summarizes activity in the Company’s employee stock purchase plan during the nine months ended March 30, 2013:

	Shares			Weighted Average Purchase Price
Beginning Available		1,835,939
Purchases		(56,809	)	$	6.57
Ending Available		1,779,130

At March 30, 2013, the Company had $18,000 in unamortized share-based compensation related to its employee stock purchase plan which will be amortized and recognized in the consolidated statement of operations over the next month.

SHARE-BASED COMPENSATION

The following table shows total share-based compensation expense classified by Consolidated Statements of Operations reporting caption for the three and nine months ended March 30, 2013 and March 31, 2012 generated from the plans described above:

	Three Months Ended						Nine Months Ended
(In thousands)	March 30, 2013			March 31, 2012			March 30, 2013			March 31, 2012
Cost of revenues	$	51		$	60		$	146		$	161
Research and development		317			371			972			1,099
Selling, general and administrative		474			496			1,425			1,573
Pre-tax share-based compensation expense		842			927			2,543			2,833
Income tax impact		(277	)		(41	)		(838	)		(689	)
Net share-based compensation expense	$	565		$	886		$	1,705		$	2,144

Share-based compensation by type of award is as follows:

	Three Months Ended				Nine Months Ended
(In thousands)	March 30, 2013		March 31, 2012		March 30, 2013		March 31, 2012
Stock options	$	265	$	304	$	803	$	1,074
Restricted stock units		523		549		1,578		1,556
Stock purchase plan		54		74		162		203
Total share-based compensation expense	$	842	$	927	$	2,543	$	2,833

The amount of share-based compensation expense capitalized in inventory at March 30, 2013 and June 30, 2012 is immaterial.

XML

Investment in Unconsolidated Affiliate (Details Textual) (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	3 Months Ended		9 Months Ended
	Mar. 30, 2013	Mar. 31, 2012	Mar. 30, 2013	Mar. 31, 2012
Investment in Unconsolidated Affiliate (Textual)
Equity in net income of unconsolidated affiliate	$ 21	$ 4	$ 186	$ 83
Jiyuan Crystal Photoelectric Frequency Technology Ltd [Member]
Investment in Unconsolidated Affiliate (Textual)
Equity interest	49.00%		49.00%
Equity in net income of unconsolidated affiliate			$ 186	$ 83

XML

Industry and Segment Information

9 Months Ended

Mar. 30, 2013

Industry and Segment Information [Abstract]

INDUSTRY AND SEGMENT INFORMATION

7. INDUSTRY AND SEGMENT INFORMATION

The Company has three operating segments which aggregate into one reportable segment, the interconnectivity device supply market. The Company designs, develops, manufactures and markets high performance integrated circuits and frequency control products.

The following table indicates the percentage of the Company’s net revenues and accounts receivable in excess of 10 percent with any single customer:

	Net Revenues
	Three Months Ended							Nine Months Ended
	March 30, 2013			March 31, 2012				March 30, 2013			March 31, 2012
Customer A		24	%			18	%		19	%		17	%
Customer B		11	%			14	%		12	%		14	%
All others		65	%			68	%		69	%		69	%
		100	%			100	%		100	%		100	%
	Accounts Receivable
	March 30, 2013				June 30, 2012
Customer A		25	%			26	%
All others		75	%			74	%
		100	%			100	%

For geographical reporting, the Company attributes net revenues to the country where customers are located (the “bill to” location). The Company neither conducts business in nor sells to persons in Iran, Syria, Sudan, or North Korea, countries located in referenced regions identified as state sponsors of terrorism by the U.S. Department of State and subject to U.S. economic sanctions and export controls. The following table sets forth net revenues by country for the three and nine month periods ended March 30, 2013 and March 31, 2012:

	Net Revenues
	Three Months Ended				Nine Months Ended
(in thousands)	March 30, 2013		March 31, 2012		March 30, 2013		March 31, 2012
China (including Hong Kong)	$	15,459	$	11,543	$	45,549	$	34,422
Taiwan		8,635		15,227		33,721		45,232
United States		1,969		2,010		5,008		5,670
Other (less than 10% each)		4,303		4,598		13,270		13,867
Total net revenues	$	30,366	$	33,378	$	97,548	$	99,191

Long-lived assets consist of all non-monetary assets, excluding financial assets, deferred taxes, goodwill and intangible assets. The Company attributes long-lived assets to the country where they are located. The following table sets forth the Company’s long-lived assets by country of location as of March 30, 2013 and June 30, 2012:

(in thousands)	March 30, 2013		June 30, 2012
China (including Hong Kong)	$	35,567	$	37,761
Taiwan		14,831		15,005
United States		9,092		2,304
Korea		579		650
Others (less than 10% each)		260		382
Total long-lived assets	$	60,329	$	56,102

XML

Stock Repurchase Program

9 Months Ended

Mar. 30, 2013

Stock Repurchase Program and Equity and Comprehensive Income [Abstract]

STOCK REPURCHASE PROGRAM

8. STOCK REPURCHASE PROGRAM

On April 29, 2008, the Company’s Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of $30 million worth of common stock, and on April 26, 2012, the Board authorized an additional share repurchase program for $25 million of common stock. The Company may repurchase the shares from time to time in open market or private transactions, at the discretion of the Company’s management.

During the nine month period ended March 30, 2013, the Company repurchased 847,470 shares for an aggregate cost of approximately $6.1 million. During the nine month period ended March 31, 2012, the Company repurchased 1,184,229 shares for an aggregate cost of approximately $9.2 million. Current cash balances and the proceeds from stock option exercises and purchases in the stock purchase plan have funded stock repurchases in the past, and the Company expects to fund future stock repurchases from these same sources. As of March 30, 2013, the Company had approximately $19.6 million of repurchase authority remaining under the 2012 authority.

XML

Income Taxes

9 Months Ended

Mar. 30, 2013

Income Taxes [Abstract]

INCOME TAXES

10. INCOME TAXES

Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes

The Company’s total amount of unrecognized tax benefits as of March 30, 2013 was $2,697,000. $2,298,000 of this amount would affect the Company’s tax rate if recognized. In addition, as of March 30, 2013 the Company had accrued $319,000 for any interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits.

The Company’s effective tax rate may differ from the federal statutory rate primarily due to state income taxes, stock-based compensation from incentive stock options, the employee stock purchase plan and foreign non-qualified stock options, differing tax rates in income-earning foreign jurisdictions, and the inability to utilize losses in certain foreign entities to offset domestic income.

The Company is subject to examination by federal, foreign, and various state jurisdictions for the years 2006 through 2012. The Company is currently under examination of the federal tax returns for fiscal 2010 and 2011 by the Internal Revenue Service.

Income Tax Expense

In fiscal 2013, we began implementation of an operating structure to more efficiently align the Company's transaction flows with the Company's geographic business operations. We have foreign sales offices in Korea, Taiwan, Japan, Singapore and Hong Kong, manufacturing operations in Taiwan and China, and research and development centers in Hong Kong and China. Revenues from non-U.S. regions account for over 90% of all revenue. In addition, nearly all of our suppliers are located in the Asia Pacific region. Based on these factors we have formed new legal entities and begun realigning existing ones, completed the intercompany transfer of intellectual property rights, inventory and fixed assets across different tax jurisdictions, and implemented intercompany intellectual property licensing agreements between our U.S. and foreign entities. These actions have resulted in a gain for tax purposes, for which we recorded a $5.0 million tax provision during the nine months ended March 30, 2013.

Income tax expense for the nine months ended March 30, 2013 and March 31, 2012 was $5.7 million and $123,000, respectively, and was comprised of domestic federal and state income tax and foreign income and withholding tax. The income tax expense for the nine months ended March 30, 2013 included the $5.0 million tax provision discussed above. As of March 30, 2013, the Company has recorded a valuation allowance of $4.3 million against certain of its deferred tax assets.

XML

Investments in Marketable Securities (Details) (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	Mar. 30, 2013	Jun. 30, 2012
Available-for-Sale Securities
Amortized Cost	$ 91,436	$ 103,172
Unrealized Gains	690	746
Unrealized Losses	(128)	(366)
Net Unrealized Gains (Losses)	562	380
Fair Value	91,998	103,552
Time deposits [Member]
Available-for-Sale Securities
Amortized Cost	12,916	10,344
Unrealized Gains
Unrealized Losses
Net Unrealized Gains (Losses)
Fair Value	12,916	10,344
US Treasury Securities [Member]
Available-for-Sale Securities
Amortized Cost	373	3,639
Unrealized Gains	1
Unrealized Losses		(5)
Net Unrealized Gains (Losses)	1	(5)
Fair Value	374	3,634
National government and agency securities [Member]
Available-for-Sale Securities
Amortized Cost	5,184	6,582
Unrealized Gains	136	167
Unrealized Losses
Net Unrealized Gains (Losses)	136	167
Fair Value	5,320	6,749
State and municipal bond obligations [Member]
Available-for-Sale Securities
Amortized Cost	3,175	1,772
Unrealized Gains	19	1
Unrealized Losses	(1)	(1)
Net Unrealized Gains (Losses)	18
Fair Value	3,193	1,772
Corporate bonds and notes [Member]
Available-for-Sale Securities
Amortized Cost	50,780	61,374
Unrealized Gains	414	461
Unrealized Losses	(69)	(197)
Net Unrealized Gains (Losses)	345	264
Fair Value	51,125	61,638
Asset backed Securities [Member]
Available-for-Sale Securities
Amortized Cost	10,805	10,148
Unrealized Gains	42	19
Unrealized Losses	(15)	(86)
Net Unrealized Gains (Losses)	27	(67)
Fair Value	10,832	10,081
Mortgage backed securities [Member]
Available-for-Sale Securities
Amortized Cost	8,203	9,313
Unrealized Gains	78	98
Unrealized Losses	(43)	(77)
Net Unrealized Gains (Losses)	35	21
Fair Value	$ 8,238	$ 9,334

XML

Investments in Marketable Securities (Details 2) (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	Jun. 30, 2012
Fair market value of short and long-term investments
Less than 12 months	$ 8,600
One to three years	30,464
Over three years	43,889
Multiple dates	9,045
Total	$ 91,998

XML

Industrial Development Subsidy (Details) (USD $)	3 Months Ended		9 Months Ended
	Mar. 30, 2013	Mar. 31, 2012	Mar. 30, 2013	Mar. 31, 2012
Industrial Development Subsidy (Textual)
Industrial development subsidies	$ 12,600,000		$ 12,600,000
Remaining balance of industrial development subsidies	7,400,000		7,400,000
Minimum period in which remaining subsidy expected to be recognized			3 years
Maximum period in which remaining subsidy expected to be recognized			20 years
Amount of subsidy used for reduction in cost of goods sold	185,000	191,000	1,103,000	880,000
Amount of subsidy used for reduction in operating expenses	$ 46,000	$ 45,000	$ 136,000	$ 135,000

XML

Basis of Presentation (Details)	9 Months Ended
	Mar. 30, 2013
Basis of Presentation (Textual)
Period of warranty	1 year

XML

Shareholders' Equity and Share-Based Compensation (Details 1) (USD $) In Thousands, except Per Share data, unless otherwise specified	9 Months Ended	12 Months Ended
	Mar. 30, 2013	Jun. 30, 2012
Schedule of stock option activity
Beginning balance, Options outstanding	2,453
Options, granted	175
Option Outstanding, exercised	(6)
Option Outstanding, Cancelled or expired	(157)
Ending balance, Option outstanding	2,465	2,453
Options vested and expected to vest at March 30, 2013	2,433
Options exercisable at March 30, 2013	2,110
Beginning Balance, Weighted Average Exercise Price	$ 10.34
Weighted Average Exercise Price, granted	$ 8.54
Weighted Average Exercise Price, Exercised	$ 7.87
Weighted Average Exercise Price, Cancelled or expired	$ 9.58
Ending Balance, Weighted Average Exercise Price	$ 10.27	$ 10.34
Options vested and expected to vest at March 30, 2013, Weighted Average Exercise Price	$ 10.29
Options exercisable at March 30, 2013, Weighted Average Exercise Price	$ 10.52
Options outstanding, Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Term	4 years 9 months 25 days	5 years 1 month 13 days
Options vested and expected to vest at March 30, 2013, Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Term	4 years 9 months 4 days
Options exercisable at March 30, 2013, Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Term	4 years 2 months 16 days
Beginning balance, Options outstanding, Aggregate Intrinsic Value	$ 912
Ending balance ,Options outstanding, Aggregate Intrinsic Value	25	912
Options vested and expected to vest at March 30, 2013, Aggregate intrinsic value	25
Options exercisable at March 30, 2013, Aggregate intrinsic value	$ 25

XML

Investments in Marketable Securities

9 Months Ended

Mar. 30, 2013

Investments In Marketable Securities [Abstract]

INVESTMENTS IN MARKETABLE SECURITIES

15. INVESTMENTS IN MARKETABLE SECURITIES

The Company’s policy is to invest in instruments with investment grade credit ratings. The Company classifies its short-term investments as “available-for-sale” securities and the Company bases the cost of securities sold using the specific identification method. The Company accounts for unrealized gains and losses on its available-for-sale securities as a separate component of shareholders’ equity in the consolidated balance sheets in the period in which the gain or loss occurs. The Company classifies its available-for-sale securities as current or noncurrent based on each security’s attributes. At March 30, 2013, a summary of investments by major security type is as follows:

	As of March 30, 2013
(in thousands)	Amortized Cost		Unrealized Gains		Unrealized Losses			Net Unrealized Gains (Losses)		Fair Market Value
Available-for-Sale Securities
Time deposits	$	12,916	$	—	$	—		$	—	$	12,916
US Treasury securities		373		1		—			1		374
National government and agency securities		5,184		136		—			136		5,320
State and municipal bond obligations		3,175		19		(1	)		18		3,193
Corporate bonds and notes		50,780		414		(69	)		345		51,125
Asset backed securities		10,805		42		(15	)		27		10,832
Mortgage backed securities		8,203		78		(43	)		35		8,238
Total	$	91,436	$	690	$	(128	)	$	562	$	91,998

At June 30, 2012 a summary of investments by major security type is as follows:

	As of June 30, 2012
(in thousands)	Amortized Cost		Unrealized Gains		Unrealized Losses			Net Unrealized Gains (Losses)			Fair Value
Available-for-Sale Securities
Time deposits	$	10,344	$	—	$	—		$	—		$	10,344
US Treasury securities		3,639		—		(5	)		(5	)		3,634
National government and agency securities		6,582		167		—			167			6,749
State and municipal bond obligations		1,772		1		(1	)		—			1,772
Corporate bonds and notes		61,374		461		(197	)		264			61,638
Asset backed securities		10,148		19		(86	)		(67	)		10,081
Mortgage backed securities		9,313		98		(77	)		21			9,334
Total	$	103,172	$	746	$	(366	)	$	380		$	103,552

The above investments are included in short-term and long-term investments in marketable securities on the Company’s condensed consolidated balance sheets.

The following tables show the unrealized losses and fair market values of the Company’s investments that have unrealized losses, aggregated by investment category and length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position, at March 30, 2013 and June 30, 2012:

	Continuous Unrealized Losses at March 30, 2013
	Less Than 12 Months					12 Months or Longer						Total
(In thousands)	Fair Market Value		Unrealized Losses			Fair Market Value			Unrealized Losses			Fair Market Value			Unrealized Losses
National government and agency securities	$	141		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	141		$	—
State and municipal bond obligations		1,186			1			—			—			1,186			1
Corporate bonds and notes		7,782			22			2,338			47			10,120			69
Asset backed securities		4,578			8			730			7			5,308			15
Mortgage backed securities		2,190			6			228			37			2,418			43
	$	15,877		$	37		$	3,296		$	91		$	19,173		$	128
	Continuous Unrealized Losses at June 30, 2012
	Less Than 12 Months						12 Months or Longer						Total
(in thousands)	Fair Value			Unrealized Losses			Fair Value			Unrealized Losses			Fair Value			Unrealized Losses
US Treasury securities	$	3,434		$	5		$	—		$	—		$	3,434		$	5
National government and agency securities		327			—			—			—			327			—
State and municipal bond obligations		1,033			1			—			—			1,033			1
Corporate bonds and notes		12,117			85			3,782			112			15,899			197
Asset backed securities		1,784			15			1,595			71			3,379			86
Mortgage backed securities		659			—			403			77			1,062			77
	$	19,354		$	106		$	5,780		$	260		$	25,134		$	366

The unrealized losses are of a temporary nature due to the Company’s intent and ability to hold the investments until maturity or until the cost is recoverable. The unrealized losses are primarily due to fluctuations in market interest rates. The Company reports unrealized gains and losses on its “available-for-sale” securities in accumulated other comprehensive income in shareholders’ equity.

The Company records gains or losses realized on sales of available-for-sale securities in interest and other income, net on its condensed consolidated statements of operations. The cost of securities sold is based on the specific identification of the security and its amortized cost. For the nine months ended March 30, 2013 and March 31, 2012, proceeds from sales and maturities of available-for-sale securities were $89.1 million and $76.7 million, respectively, and realized gains were $852,000 and $556,000, respectively.

The following table lists the fair market value of the Company’s short- and long-term investments by length of time to maturity as of March 30, 2013. Securities with maturities over multiple dates are mortgage-backed (“MBS”) or asset-backed securities (“ABS”) featuring periodic principle paydowns through 2052.

(in thousands)	March 30, 2013
Contractual Maturities
Less than 12 months	$	8,600
One to three years		30,464
Over three years		43,889
Multiple dates		9,045
Total	$	91,998

XML

Inventories (Tables)

9 Months Ended

Mar. 30, 2013

Inventories [Abstract]

Inventories

(in thousands)	March 30, 2013		June 30, 2012
Raw materials	$	6,127	$	7,371
Work in process		3,186		3,981
Finished goods		4,561		5,252
	$	13,874	$	16,604

XML

Stock Repurchase Program (Details) (USD $) In Millions, except Share data, unless otherwise specified	9 Months Ended
	Mar. 30, 2013	Mar. 31, 2012	Apr. 26, 2012	Apr. 29, 2008
Stock Repurchase Program (Textual)
Common stock authorized to repurchase under share repurchase program			25,000,000	30,000,000
Stock repurchased during period, Shares	847,470	1,184,229
Stock repurchased during period, Value	$ 6.1	$ 9.2
Remaining shares authorized to repurchase under the 2012 authority	$ 19.6

XML

Inventories (Details) (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	Mar. 30, 2013	Jun. 30, 2012
Inventories
Raw materials	$ 6,127	$ 7,371
Work in process	3,186	3,981
Finished goods	4,561	5,252
Inventories, Total	$ 13,874	$ 16,604

XML

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss) (Unaudited) (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	3 Months Ended		9 Months Ended
	Mar. 30, 2013	Mar. 31, 2012	Mar. 30, 2013	Mar. 31, 2012
Statements Of Comprehensive Income (Loss) [Abstract]
Net loss	$ (681)	$ (267)	$ (4,828)	$ (157)
Other comprehensive income (loss):
Change in net unrealized gain (loss) on securities available for sale, net of tax	(97)	754	152	85
Foreign currency translation adjustment	(508)	1,413	565	1,007
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax	(605)	2,167	717	1,092
Comprehensive income (loss)	$ (1,286)	$ 1,900	$ (4,111)	$ 935

XML

Inventories

9 Months Ended

Mar. 30, 2013

Inventories [Abstract]

INVENTORIES

4. INVENTORIES

Inventories consist of:

(in thousands)	March 30, 2013		June 30, 2012
Raw materials	$	6,127	$	7,371
Work in process		3,186		3,981
Finished goods		4,561		5,252
	$	13,874	$	16,604

The Company considers raw material inventory obsolete and reserves it if the raw material has not moved in 365 days. The Company reviews its assembled devices for excess and records a reserve if the quantity of assembled devices in inventory is in excess of the greater of the quantity shipped in the previous twelve months, the quantity in backlog or the quantity forecasted to be shipped in the following twelve months. In certain circumstances, management will determine, based on expected usage or other factors, that inventory considered excess by these guidelines should not be reserved. The Company does occasionally determine that the last twelve months’ sales levels will not continue and reserves inventory in line with the quantity forecasted. As of March 30, 2013, the Company had reserved for $3.3 million of inventory as compared to $3.8 million of inventory reserves at June 30, 2012.

XML

Income Taxes (Details) (USD $)	3 Months Ended		9 Months Ended
	Mar. 30, 2013	Mar. 31, 2012	Mar. 30, 2013	Mar. 31, 2012
Income Taxes (Textual)
Unrecognized tax benefits	$ 2,697,000		$ 2,697,000
Unrecognized tax benefits that would affect the Company’s effective tax rate if recognized	2,298,000		2,298,000
Accrued interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits	319,000		319,000
Income tax examination year, range			2006 through 2012
Percentage of revenues from Non- US Regions			For over 90
Provision for tax			5,000,000
Income tax expense (benefit)	395,000	(76,000)	5,652,000	123,000
Valuation allowance	$ 4,300,000		$ 4,300,000

XML

Fair Value Measurements (Details Textual) (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	9 Months Ended
	Mar. 30, 2013
Fair Value Measurements (Textual)
Time deposits included in cash and cash equivalents	$ 3,532
Fair value of assets transfers into or out of Level 2	$ 0

XML

Accrued Liabilities (Tables)

9 Months Ended

Mar. 30, 2013

Accrued Liabilities [Abstract]

Accrued liabilities

(in thousands)	March 30, 2013		June 30, 2012
Accrued compensation	$	5,886	$	5,886
Income taxes payable		1,016		2
Sales commissions		371		497
Accrued construction liabilities		172		845
Other accrued expenses		1,537		1,378
	$	8,982	$	8,608

XML

Goodwill and Intangible Assets (Details Textual) (USD $)	3 Months Ended		9 Months Ended
	Mar. 30, 2013	Mar. 31, 2012	Mar. 30, 2013	Mar. 31, 2012
Goodwill and Intangible Assets (Textual)
Amortization expense related to finite-lived purchased intangible assets	$ 775,000	$ 778,000	$ 2,300,000	$ 2,400,000
Impairment of intangible assets			0
Accelerated amortization to a supplier relationship				$ 125,000
Customer relationships [Member] | Minimum [Member]
Goodwill and Intangible Assets (Textual)
Finite lived intangible assets weighted average useful lives			1 year
Customer relationships [Member] | Maximum [Member]
Goodwill and Intangible Assets (Textual)
Finite lived intangible assets weighted average useful lives			5 years
eCERA trade name [Member] | Minimum [Member]
Goodwill and Intangible Assets (Textual)
Finite lived intangible assets weighted average useful lives			1 year
eCERA trade name [Member] | Maximum [Member]
Goodwill and Intangible Assets (Textual)
Finite lived intangible assets weighted average useful lives			5 years
Core developed technology [Member] | Minimum [Member]
Goodwill and Intangible Assets (Textual)
Finite lived intangible assets weighted average useful lives			1 year
Core developed technology [Member] | Maximum [Member]
Goodwill and Intangible Assets (Textual)
Finite lived intangible assets weighted average useful lives			5 years

XML

Industrial Development Subsidy

9 Months Ended

Mar. 30, 2013

Industrial Development Subsidy [Abstract]

INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT SUBSIDY

14. INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT SUBSIDY

As of March 30, 2013, industrial development subsidies in the amount of $12.6 million have been earned and applied for by PSE-SD from the Jinan Hi-Tech Industries Development Zone Commission based on meeting certain pre-defined criteria. The subsidies may be used for the acquisition of assets or to cover business expenses. When a subsidy is used to acquire assets, the subsidy will be amortized over the useful life of the asset. When a subsidy is used for expenses incurred, the subsidy is regarded as earned upon the incurrence of the expenditure. The remaining balance of the subsidies at March 30, 2013 was $7.4 million, which amount is expected to be recognized over the next three to twenty years.

The Company recognized $185,000 and $191,000 of industrial development subsidy as a reduction of cost of goods sold and $46,000 and $45,000 of industrial development subsidy as a reduction of operating expenses in the consolidated statement of operations for the three month periods ended March 30, 2013 and March 31, 2012, respectively. The Company recognized $1,103,000 and $880,000 of industrial development subsidy as a reduction of cost of goods sold and $136,000 and $135,000 of industrial development subsidy as a reduction of operating expenses in the consolidated statement of operations for the nine month periods ended March 30, 2013 and March 31, 2012, respectively.