UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

x Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

for the Quarterly Period Ended June 30, 2009 OR

¨ Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

for the transition period from              to             

Commission file number 001-13601

OYO GEOSPACE CORPORATION

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)

Delaware	76-0447780
(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization)	(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

7007 Pinemont Drive

Houston, Texas 77040-6601

(Address of Principal Executive Offices) (Zip Code)

(713) 986-4444

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  x    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    Yes  ¨    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer	¨	Accelerated filer	x
Non-accelerated filer	¨  (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)	Smaller reporting company	¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    Yes  ¨    No  x

There were 5,963,708 shares of the Registrant’s Common Stock outstanding as of the close of business on August 3, 2009.

Table of Contents

		Page Number
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
	Item 1. Financial Statements	3
	Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	13
	Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk	22
	Item 4. Controls and Procedures	23
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
	Item 1. Legal Proceedings	24
	Item 1A. Risk Factors	24
	Item 6. Exhibits	24

2

PART I—FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements

OYO GEOSPACE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(in thousands)

	June 30, 2009			September 30, 2008
	(unaudited)
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	1,554		$	1,562
Trade accounts receivable, net		9,311			21,546
Current portion of notes receivable, net		12,801			10,874
Inventories, net		62,715			64,396
Deferred income tax asset		4,053			2,931
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		1,842			2,635
Total current assets		92,276			103,944
Rental equipment, net		3,731			3,014
Property, plant and equipment, net		37,692			40,543
Patents, net		867			1,057
Goodwill		1,843			1,843
Non-current deferred income tax asset		123			624
Non-current notes receivable, net		251			7,146
Other assets		1,325			1,209
Total assets	$	138,108		$	159,380
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Book overdrafts	$	—		$	35
Notes payable and current maturities of long-term debt		723			709
Accounts payable trade		2,819			8,210
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities		5,111			9,922
Deferred revenue		346			962
Deferred income tax liability		44			78
Income tax payable		116			1,553
Total current liabilities		9,159			21,469
Long-term debt, net of current maturities		9,004			19,526
Non-current deferred income tax liabilities		691			1,022
Total liabilities		18,854			42,017
Commitments and contingencies
Stockholders’ equity:
Preferred stock		—			—
Common stock		60			59
Additional paid-in capital		42,662			42,030
Retained earnings		77,356			73,780
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)		(824	)		1,494
Total stockholders’ equity		119,254			117,363
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	138,108		$	159,380

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.

3

OYO GEOSPACE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(in thousands, except share and per share amounts)

(unaudited)

	Three Months Ended						Nine Months Ended
	June 30, 2009			June 30, 2008			June 30, 2009			June 30, 2008
Sales	$	20,790		$	35,590		$	70,155		$	104,011
Cost of sales		13,715			21,459			47,918			68,358
Gross profit		7,075			14,131			22,237			35,653
Operating expenses:
Selling, general and administrative		3,363			4,298			10,483			12,974
Research and development		1,979			2,622			5,789			6,852
Bad debt expense		524			991			435			1,037
Total operating expenses		5,866			7,911			16,707			20,863
Gain on sale of assets		—			7			7			723
Income from operations		1,209			6,227			5,537			15,513
Other income (expense):
Interest expense		(108	)		(217	)		(519	)		(652	)
Interest income		130			258			766			983
Foreign exchange gains (losses)		104			(41	)		(457	)		(57	)
Other, net		(35	)		(2	)		(98	)		(12	)
Total other income (expense), net		91			(2	)		(308	)		262
Income before income taxes		1,300			6,225			5,229			15,775
Income tax expense		293			1,891			1,653			4,923
Net income	$	1,007		$	4,334		$	3,576		$	10,852
Basic earnings per share	$	0.17		$	0.73		$	0.60		$	1.84
Diluted earnings per share	$	0.17		$	0.71		$	0.59		$	1.78
Weighted average shares outstanding—Basic		5,946,955			5,907,793			5,940,200			5,902,155
Weighted average shares outstanding—Diluted		6,065,989			6,127,952			6,063,621			6,111,558

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.

4

OYO GEOSPACE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(in thousands)

(unaudited)

	Nine Months Ended June 30, 2009			Nine Months Ended June 30, 2008
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income	$	3,576		$	10,852
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:
Deferred income tax expense (benefit)		210			(501	)
Depreciation		3,722			3,174
Amortization		185			184
Stock-based compensation expense		201			25
Bad debt expense		435			1,037
Inventory obsolescence reserve		905			653
(Gain) loss on disposal of property, plant and equipment		7			(707	)
Effects of changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Trade accounts and notes receivable		16,063			(16,241	)
Inventories		(2,194	)		(10,443	)
Prepaid expenses and other assets		505			29
Accounts payable trade		(5,238	)		1,236
Accrued expenses and other		(5,504	)		(45	)
Deferred revenue		(556	)		(1,004	)
Income tax payable		(1,429	)		(697	)
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities		10,888			(12,448	)
Cash flows from investing activities:
Proceeds from the sale of property, plant and equipment		23			736
Capital expenditures		(1,382	)		(6,799	)
Net cash used in investing activities		(1,359	)		(6,063	)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Change in book overdrafts		(35	)		97
Net borrowings (principal payments) under line of credit		(9,978	)		11,964
Borrowings under mortgage loans		—			8,800
Principal payments on mortgage loans		(530	)		(2,914	)
Excess tax benefit from share-based compensation		192			442
Proceeds from exercise of stock options		365			449
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities		(9,986	)		18,838
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash		449			(282	)
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents		(8	)		45
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period		1,562			3,013
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period	$	1,554		$	3,058

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.

5

OYO GEOSPACE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited)

1. Significant Accounting Policies

Basis of Presentation

The consolidated balance sheet of OYO Geospace Corporation and its subsidiaries (the “Company”) at September 30, 2008 was derived from the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements at that date. The consolidated balance sheet at June 30, 2009 and the consolidated statements of operations for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, and the consolidated statements of cash flows for the nine months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 were prepared by the Company without audit. In the opinion of management, all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring adjustments, necessary to present fairly the consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash flows were made. The results of operations for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2009 are not necessarily indicative of the operating results for a full year or of future operations.

Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements presented in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America were omitted. The accompanying consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes thereto contained in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2008.

Certain amounts previously presented in the consolidated financial statements have been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

The Company considers all highly liquid investments purchased with an original or remaining maturity at the time of purchase of three months or less to be cash equivalents.

Financial Instruments

Fair value estimates are made at discrete points in time based on relevant market information. These estimates may be subjective in nature and involve uncertainties and matters of significant judgment and, therefore, cannot be determined with precision. The Company believes that the carrying amounts of its financial instruments, consisting of cash and cash equivalents, accounts and notes receivable and accounts payable, approximate the fair values of such items as a result of the relative short term nature of such items. The carrying value of long-term debt approximates the fair value as a result of the interest rates reflecting market rates of interest.

Inventories

The Company records a write-down of its inventory when the cost basis of any manufactured product, including any estimated future costs to complete the manufacturing process, exceeds its net realizable value. Inventories are stated at the lower of cost (as determined by the first-in, first-out method) or market value. The Company’s subsidiary in the Russian Federation uses an average cost method to value its inventories.

Revenue Recognition

The Company primarily derives revenue from the sale, and short-term rental under operating leases, of seismic instruments and equipment and thermal solutions products. The Company generally recognizes sales revenues when its products are shipped and title and risk of loss have passed to the customer. The Company recognizes rental revenues as earned over the rental period. Rentals of the Company’s equipment generally range from daily rentals to rental periods of up to nine months or longer. Except for certain of the Company’s reservoir characterization products, its products are generally sold without any customer acceptance provisions and its standard terms of sale do not allow customers to return products for credit. In instances where the customer requires a significant performance test for the Company’s new and unproven products, the Company does not recognize the

6

OYO GEOSPACE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited)

revenue attributable to the product as to which the performance test applies until the performance test is satisfied. Collection of revenue from the sale of large-scale reservoir characterization products may occur at various stages of production or after delivery of the product, and the collected funds are not refundable to the customer. Most of the Company’s products do not require installation assistance or sophisticated instruction.

The Company recognizes revenue when all of the following criteria are met:

• Persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists. The Company operates under a purchase order/contract system for goods sold to customers, and under rental/lease agreements for equipment rentals. These documents evidence that an arrangement exists.

• Delivery has occurred or services have been rendered. For product sales, the Company does not recognize revenues until delivery has occurred or performance measures are met. For rental revenue, the Company recognizes revenue when earned.

• The seller’s price to the buyer is fixed or determinable. Sales prices are defined in writing in a customer’s purchase order, purchase contract or equipment rental agreement.

• Collectibility is reasonably assured. The Company evaluates customer credit to ensure that collectibility of revenue is reasonably assured.

Occasionally seismic customers are not able to take immediate delivery of products which were specifically manufactured to the customer’s specifications. These occasions generally occur when customers face logistical issues such as project delays or delays with their seismic crew deployment. In these instances, customers have asked the Company to hold the equipment for a short period of time until they can take physical delivery of the product (referred to as “bill and hold” arrangements). The Company does not modify its normal billing and credit terms for these types of sales. As of June 30, 2009, there were sales of $1.7 million under bill and hold arrangements.

Research and Development Costs

The Company expenses research and development costs as incurred. Research and development costs include salaries, employee benefit costs, department supplies, direct project costs and other related costs.

Product Warranties

The Company offers a standard product warranty obligating it to repair or replace equipment with manufacturing defects. The Company maintains a reserve for future warranty costs based on historical experience or, in the absence of historical product experience, management’s estimates. Changes in the warranty reserve are reflected in the following table (in thousands):

Balance at the beginning of the period (October 1, 2008)	$	1,147
Accruals for warranties issued during the period		1,633
Accruals related to pre-existing warranties (including changes in estimates)		—
Settlements made (in cash or in kind) during the period		(1,737	)
Balance at the end of the period (June 30, 2009)	$	1,043

Subsequent Events

The Company evaluates events and transactions that occur after the balance sheet date but before the financial statements are issued. The Company evaluated such events and transactions through August 7, 2009 when the financial statements were filed electronically with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

7

OYO GEOSPACE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited)

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP FAS No. 115-2 and FAS No. 124-2, “Recognition and Presentation of Other-Than-Temporary Impairments” (“FSP FAS No. 115-2” and “FAS No. 124-2”). FSP FAS No. 115-2 and FAS No. 124-2 change the method for determining whether an other-than-temporary impairment exists for debt securities and the amount of the impairment to be recorded in earnings. FSP FAS No. 115-2 and FAS No. 124-2 are effective for interim and annual periods ending after June 15, 2009. The implementation of these standards did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP FAS No. 107-1 and APB Opinion No. 28-1, “Interim Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments” (“FSP FAS No. 107-1” and “APB No. 28-1”). FSP FAS No. 107-1 and APB No. 28-1 require fair value disclosures in both interim as well as annual financial statements in order to provide more timely information about the effects of current market conditions on financial instruments. FSP FAS No. 107-1 and APB No. 28-1 are effective for interim and annual periods ending after June 15, 2009. As FSP FAS No. 107-1 and APB No. 28-1 relate specifically to disclosures, these standards did not have an impact on the Company’s financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

In May 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 165, “Subsequent Events” (“SFAS 165”). SFAS 165 requires companies to recognize in their financial statements the effects of subsequent events that provide additional evidence about conditions that existed at the date of the balance sheet, including the estimates inherent in the process of preparing financial statements. An entity shall disclose the date through which subsequent events have been evaluated, as well as whether that date is the date the financial statements were issued. Companies are not permitted to recognize subsequent events that provide evidence about conditions that did not exist at the date of the balance sheet but arose after the balance sheet date and before financial statements are issued. Some nonrecognized subsequent events must be disclosed to keep the financial statements from being misleading. For such events a company must disclose the nature of the event, an estimate of its financial effect, or a statement that such an estimate cannot be made. This statement applies prospectively for interim and annual financial periods ending after June 15, 2009. The implementation of this standard did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 168, “The FASB Accounting Standards Codification and the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles – a replacement of FASB Statement No. 162” (“SFAS 168”). SFAS 168 stipulates the FASB Accounting Standards Codification is the source of authoritative U.S. GAAP recognized by the FASB to be applied by nongovernmental entities. SFAS 168 is effective for financials statements issued for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. The implementation of this standard will not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

8

OYO GEOSPACE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited)

2. Earnings Per Common Share

The following table summarizes the calculation of net earnings and weighted average common shares and common equivalent shares outstanding for purposes of the computation of earnings per share (in thousands, except share and per share data):

	Three Months Ended				Nine Months Ended
	June 30, 2009		June 30, 2008		June 30, 2009		June 30, 2008
Net earnings available to common stockholders	$	1,007	$	4,334	$	3,576	$	10,852
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding - basic		5,946,955		5,907,793		5,940,200		5,902,155
Weighted average number of common share equivalents outstanding		119,034		220,159		123,421		209,403
Weighted average number of common shares and common share equivalents outstanding - diluted		6,065,989		6,127,952		6,063,621		6,111,558
Basic earnings per common share	$	0.17	$	0.73	$	0.60	$	1.84
Diluted earnings per common share	$	0.17	$	0.71	$	0.59	$	1.78

Options totaling 159,300 and zero shares of common stock for the three months ended June 30, 2009 and June 30, 2008, respectively, and options totaling 159,300 and zero shares of common stock for the nine months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively, were not included in the computation of weighted average shares because the impact of these options was antidilutive.

3. Comprehensive Income

Comprehensive income includes all changes in a company’s equity, except those resulting from investments by and distributions to stockholders. The following table summarizes the components of comprehensive income (in thousands):

	Three Months Ended				Nine Months Ended
	June 30, 2009		June 30, 2008		June 30, 2009			June 30, 2008
Net income	$	1,007	$	4,334	$	3,576		$	10,852
Foreign currency translation adjustments		1,241		99		(2,318	)		177
Total comprehensive income	$	2,248	$	4,433	$	1,258		$	11,029

9

OYO GEOSPACE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited)

4. Trade Accounts and Notes Receivable

The Company’s current trade accounts receivable consisted of the following (in thousands):

	June 30, 2009			September 30, 2008
Trade accounts receivable	$	10,915		$	22,875
Allowance for doubtful accounts		(1,604	)		(1,329	)
	$	9,311		$	21,546

The allowance for doubtful accounts represents the Company’s best estimate of probable credit losses. The Company determines the allowance based upon historical experience and a review of its balances. Accounts receivable balances are charged off against the allowance whenever it is probable that the receivable will not be recoverable.

At each of June 30, 2009 and September 30, 2008, the Company’s current notes receivable was $12.8 million and $10.9 million, respectively. The Company also had notes receivable of $0.3 million and $7.1 million classified as long-term at June 30, 2009 and September 30, 2008, respectively. The Company had a reserve for doubtful notes of zero at June 30, 2009 and September 30, 2008. Notes receivable are generally collateralized by the products sold and bear interest at rates ranging up to 12.0% per year.

5. Inventories

Inventories consist of the following (in thousands):

	June 30, 2009			September 30, 2008
Finished goods	$	20,042		$	14,968
Work-in-process		9,404			17,883
Raw materials		37,821			35,484
Obsolescence reserve		(4,552	)		(3,939	)
	$	62,715		$	64,396

The Company’s reserve for slow moving and obsolete inventories is analyzed and adjusted periodically to reflect the Company’s best estimate of the net realizable value of such inventories.

During the nine months ended June 30, 2009, the Company transferred $1.8 million of equipment from inventories to rental equipment.

10

OYO GEOSPACE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited)

6. Segment Information

The Company evaluates financial performance based on two business segments: Seismic and Thermal Solutions. The Seismic product lines currently consist of geophones and hydrophones, including multi-component geophones and hydrophones, seismic leader wire, geophone string connectors, seismic telemetry cable, high definition reservoir characterization products and services, marine seismic cable retrieval devices, data acquisition systems, offshore cables and industrial products. Thermal Solutions products include thermal printers, thermal printheads and dry thermal film and other media. The Company sells these products to a variety of markets, including the screen print, point of sale, signage and textile market sectors. The Company also sells Thermal Solutions products to its seismic customers.

The following tables summarize the Company’s segment information (in thousands):

	Three Months Ended						Nine Months Ended
	June 30, 2009			June 30, 2008			June 30, 2009			June 30, 2008
Net sales:
Seismic	$	17,360		$	31,471		$	59,658		$	92,107
Thermal solutions		3,235			3,949			9,904			11,402
Corporate		195			170			593			502
Total	$	20,790		$	35,590		$	70,155		$	104,011
Income (loss) from operations:
Seismic	$	2,706		$	8,012		$	10,337		$	20,607
Thermal solutions		169			280			349			1,105
Corporate		(1,666	)		(2,065	)		(5,149	)		(6,199	)
Total	$	1,209		$	6,227		$	5,537		$	15,513

7. Credit Agreement

On November 22, 2004, several of the Company’s subsidiaries entered into a credit agreement (the “Original Credit Agreement”) with a bank. The Original Credit Agreement has been amended periodically since 2004, and most recently on April 30, 2009 (as so amended, the “Credit Agreement”). Under the Credit Agreement, the Company’s borrower subsidiaries can borrow up to $25.0 million principally secured by their accounts receivable, inventories and equipment. The Credit Agreement expires on April 30, 2011. The Credit Agreement limits the incurrence of additional indebtedness, requires the maintenance of certain financial ratios, restricts the Company and its subsidiaries’ ability to pay dividends and contains other covenants customary in agreements of this type. The Company believes the most restrictive covenants in the Credit Agreement are (i) the fixed charge coverage ratio of EBITDA to certain charges, and (ii) the cash flow leverage ratio of total borrowings (excluding real estate borrowings) to adjusted EBITDA. At June 30, 2009, the Company was in compliance with all covenants. The interest rate for borrowings under the Credit Agreement is a LIBOR based rate with a margin spread of 300-400 basis points depending upon the maintenance of certain ratios. At June 30, 2009, there were no borrowings under the Credit Agreement, standby letters of credit outstanding in the amount of $0.2 million and additional borrowings available of $24.8 million.

11

OYO GEOSPACE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited)

8. Income Taxes

The United States statutory tax rate for the periods ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 was 34.0% and 35.0%, respectively. The Company’s effective tax rates for the three months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 were 22.5% and 30.4%, respectively. The Company’s effective tax rate for the nine months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 was 31.6% and 31.2%, respectively. These lower effective tax rates primarily resulted from research and experimentation tax credits and the manufacturers’/producers’ deduction.

9. Legal Proceedings

On July 8, 2009, the Company received a complaint filed in the United States District Court in Nevada (the “Court”) alleging that the Geospace Seismic Recorder (“GSR”), the Company’s newly developed wireless data acquisition system, infringes upon a patent held by Ascend Geo, LLC (“Ascend”). In addition to monetary damages, Ascend is requesting a preliminary injunction against future sales by the Company of the GSR system. The Company filed its response with the Court requesting that it deny Ascend’s request for a preliminary injunction. The Company strongly believes that the GSR system does not violate Ascend’s patent. The Company also believes that Ascend’s patent is not valid and intends to strongly contest its validity. The Company intends to vigorously defend itself in this matter; however, it is unable at this time to predict the outcome and effects of this claim.

10. Disclosures about Fair Value

Effective October 1, 2007, the Company adopted SFAS No. 157 “Fair Value Measurements” (“SFAS No. 157”), which defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value, establishes a fair value hierarchy based on the quality of inputs used to measure fair value and enhances disclosure requirements for fair value measurements. The implementation of SFAS No. 157 did not cause a significant change in the method of calculating fair value of the Company’s assets or liabilities. The primary impact from adoption was that it requires additional disclosures.

SFAS No. 157 establishes a three-level valuation hierarchy for disclosure of fair value measurements. The valuation hierarchy categorizes assets and liabilities measured at fair value into one of three different levels depending on the observability of the inputs employed in the measurement. The three levels are defined as follows:

Level 1 –	Observable inputs such as quoted prices in active markets at the measurement date for identical, unrestricted assets or liabilities.
Level 2 –	Other inputs that are observable directly or indirectly such as quoted prices in markets that are not active, or inputs which are observable, either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the asset or liability.
Level 3 –	Unobservable inputs for which there is little or no market data and which the Company makes its own assumptions about how market participants would price the assets and liabilities.

The following table presents information about the Company’s assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis as of June 30, 2009, and indicates the fair value hierarchy of the valuation techniques utilized by the Company to determine such fair value (in thousands):

	Level 1	Level 2	Level 3		Total
Goodwill	—	—	$	1,843	$	1,843

12

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The following is management’s discussion and analysis of the major elements of our consolidated financial statements. You should read this discussion and analysis together with our consolidated financial statements, including the accompanying notes, and other detailed information appearing elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and the documents incorporated by reference herein, if any, contain “forward-looking” statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. These forward-looking statements can be identified by terminology such as “may”, “will”, “should”, “intend”, “expect”, “plan”, “budget”, “forecast”, “anticipate”, “believe”, “estimate”, “predict”, “potential”, “continue”, “evaluating” or similar words. Statements that contain these words should be read carefully because they discuss our future expectations, contain projections of our future results of operations or of our financial position or state other forward-looking information. These forward-looking statements reflect our best judgment about future events and trends based on the information currently available to us. However, there will likely be events in the future that we are not able to predict or control. The factors listed under the caption “Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2008, as well as other cautionary language in such Annual Report on Form 10-K and this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, provide examples of risks, uncertainties and events that may cause our actual results to differ materially from the expectations we describe in our forward-looking statements. The occurrence of the events described in these risk factors and elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial position, and actual events and results of operations may vary materially from our current expectations.

Industry Overview

OYO Geospace Corporation is a Delaware corporation incorporated on September 13, 1997. Unless otherwise specified, the discussion in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q refers to OYO Geospace Corporation and its subsidiaries. We design and manufacture instruments and equipment used in the acquisition and processing of seismic data as well as in the characterization and monitoring of producing oil and gas reservoirs. Demand for our products has been, and will likely continue to be, vulnerable to downturns in the economy and the oil and gas industry in general. During recent months, there has been substantial volatility and a decline in oil and natural gas prices. Please refer to the risks discussed under the heading “Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2008 and in Item 1A of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for more information.

We have been in the seismic instrument and equipment business since 1980 and market our products primarily to the oil and gas industry. We also design, manufacture and distribute thermal imaging equipment, and thermal media products targeted at the screen print, point of sale, signage and textile market sectors. We have been manufacturing thermal imaging products since 1995. We report and evaluate financial information for each of these two segments: Seismic and Thermal Solutions.

Seismic Products

The seismic segment of our business accounts for the majority of our sales. Geoscientists use seismic data primarily in connection with the exploration, development and production of oil and gas reserves to map potential and known hydrocarbon bearing formations and the geologic structures that surround them.

Seismic Exploration Products

A seismic energy source and a seismic data recording system are combined to acquire seismic data. We provide many of the components of seismic data recording systems, including data acquisition systems, geophones, hydrophones, multi-component sensors, seismic leader wire, geophone strings, connectors, seismic telemetry cables and other seismic related products. On land, our customers use our data acquisition systems, geophones, leader wire, cables and connectors to receive and measure seismic reflections resulting from an energy source to data recording

13

units, which store information for processing and analysis. During fiscal year 2008, we announced the development of a land wireless seismic data acquisition system capable of very large channel configurations. We delivered several of these systems to customers during fiscal year 2008 with the largest of these systems containing 1,000 channels. In the marine environment, large ocean-going vessels tow long seismic cables known as “streamers” containing hydrophones which are used to detect pressure changes. Hydrophones transmit electrical impulses back to the vessel’s data recording unit where the seismic data is stored for subsequent processing and analysis. Our marine seismic products help steer streamers while being towed and help recover streamers if they become disconnected from the vessel.

Our seismic sensor, cable and connector products are compatible with most major competitive seismic data acquisition systems currently in use, and sales result primarily from seismic contractors purchasing our products as components of new seismic data acquisition systems or to repair and replace components of seismic data acquisition systems already in use.

Our wholly-owned subsidiary in the Russian Federation manufactures international standard geophones, sensors, seismic leader wire, seismic telemetry cables and related seismic products for customers in the Russian Federation and other international seismic marketplaces. Operating in foreign locations involves certain risks as discussed under the heading “Risk Factors – Our Foreign Subsidiaries and Foreign Marketing Efforts Face Additional Risks and Difficulties” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2008.

Seismic Reservoir Products

We have developed permanently installed high-definition reservoir characterization products for ocean-bottom applications in producing oil and gas fields. We also produce a retrievable version of this ocean-bottom system for use on fields where permanently installed systems are not appropriate or economical. Seismic surveys repeated over selected time intervals show dynamic changes within the reservoir and can be used to monitor the effects of production. Utilizing these tools, producers can enhance the recovery of oil and gas deposits over the life of a reservoir.

In addition, we produce seismic borehole acquisition systems which employ a fiber optic augmented wireline capable of very high data transmission rates. These systems are used for several reservoir characterization applications, including an application pioneered by us allowing operators and service companies to monitor and measure the results of fracturing operations. Our customers are deploying these borehole systems in the United States, Canada, China and the Middle East.

Emerging Technology Products

Our products continue to develop and expand beyond seismic applications through the utilization of our existing engineering experience and manufacturing capabilities. We design and manufacture power and communication transmission cable products for offshore applications and market these products to the offshore oil and gas and offshore construction industries. These products include a variety of specialized cables, primarily used in deepwater applications, such as remotely operated vehicle (“ROV”) tethers, umbilicals and electrical control cables. These products also include specially designed and manufactured cables, including armored cables, engineered to withstand harsh offshore operating environments.

In addition, we design and manufacture industrial sensors for the vibration monitoring and earthquake detection markets. We also design and manufacture other specialty cable and connector products, such as those used in connection with global positioning products and water meter applications.

Thermal Solution Products

Our thermal solutions product technologies were originally developed for seismic data processing applications. In 1995, we modified this technology for application in other markets. Our thermal printers include both thermal imagesetters for graphics applications and thermal plotters for seismic applications. In addition, our thermal solutions products include direct-to-screen systems, thermal printheads, dry thermal film, thermal transfer ribbon, and other thermal media. Our thermal imaging solutions produce images ranging in size from 12 to 54

14

inches wide and in resolution from 400 to 1,200 dots per inch. We market our thermal imaging solutions to a variety of industries, including the screen printing, point-of-sale, signage, flexographic and textile markets. We also continue to sell these products to our seismic customers.

The quality of thermal imaging is determined primarily by the interrelationship between a thermal printhead and the thermal media, be it film, ribbon, or any other media. We manufacture thermal printheads and thermal film, which we believe will enable us to more effectively match the characteristics of our thermal printers to thermal film, thereby improving print quality, and make us more competitive in markets for these products.

We also distribute private label high-quality dry thermal media for use in our thermal printers and direct-to-screen systems. To fully meet the demands of the interrelationship between the thermal printhead and thermal media, we are attempting to modify our thermal printheads so that they interface optimally with these other thermal media. In addition, we are engaged in efforts to develop a new line of dry thermal film and ribbon in order to improve the image quality of our media for use with our printheads. Both efforts to modify our printheads and to improve our film have been on-going in recent periods, but at this time we are unable to provide any assurance that we can eliminate printhead and film interface issues in the near future or at all. In order to achieve more than marginal growth in our thermal solutions product business in future periods, we believe that it is important to continue our concentration of efforts on both our printhead changes and media improvements.

Worldwide Economic Crisis

Demand for many of our products depends primarily on the level of worldwide oil exploration activity and, to a lesser extent, natural gas exploration activities in North America. That activity, in turn, depends primarily on prevailing oil and gas prices and availability of seismic data. The 2008 escalation of the domestic financial crisis arising out of the meltdown of the subprime lending market has caused significant distress to many global financial lending institutions, leading to a broader global financial crisis and a tightening of the availability of commercial credit. Many economists have predicted a prolonged worldwide economic recession and a slow recovery in the credit markets. These recessionary fears, combined with a decline in worldwide demand for energy, have caused energy commodity prices to decline sharply. As expected, these events have led to a decline in energy exploration activities in North America and in certain international markets, and we began to see the effects of this decline on our business during the first fiscal quarter of 2009. We are continuing to see revenue declines for our seismic exploration products including significant declines in our Russian and Canadian seismic exploration markets. We believe some of our seismic customers do not possess the financial wherewithal to survive a prolonged downturn in energy exploration, while others have scaled back their activities until financial markets stabilize and demand for exploration activities increases.

The uncertainty of these global economic matters and their ultimate impact on energy exploration activities and on our customers’ ability to access credit markets is difficult to forecast, and a decline in the demand for our seismic exploration products is likely to continue for the present time. Due to the sporadic demand for our seismic reservoir products, we have often described this portion of our seismic business as “lumpy”. In this current environment, we expect our seismic business levels will be even more erratic. Singular events may result in severe swings in our future revenues in both positive and negative directions. If these economic events continue into the foreseeable future, they could have a material adverse impact on our revenues and profits for the remainder of fiscal year 2009 and in future years.

We continue to monitor the impact that these economic conditions may have on our operations. We believe that our current cash balances, cash flows from operations and cash borrowings available under our credit facility will provide sufficient resources to meet our working capital liquidity needs for the next twelve months.

Incentive Compensation Program

Despite the economic slowdown and the challenges our business will face as a result, we adopted an incentive compensation program for fiscal year 2009 whereby most employees will be eligible to begin earning incentive compensation upon the Company reaching a five percent pretax return on stockholders’ equity, determined as of September 30, 2008. We believe that our employees will see the incentive compensation program as a reason to continue to forge ahead. To be eligible to participate in the incentive compensation program, employees must

15

participate in our Core Values Program. Based on our experience in prior years, we expect one hundred percent of our eligible employees to participate in the Core Values Program. The incentive compensation program does not apply to the employees of our Russian subsidiary as such employees participate in a locally administered bonus program. Certain non-executive employees will be required to achieve specific goals to earn a significant portion of their total incentive compensation award. If any bonus awards are earned under this program, such awards will be paid out to eligible employees after the end of fiscal year 2009.

Upon reaching the five percent threshold under this program, an incentive compensation accrual will be established equal to eighteen percent of the amount of any consolidated pretax profits above the five percent pretax return threshold. The maximum aggregate bonus available under the program for fiscal year 2009 is $3.8 million. Under this program, for the nine months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, we had accrued zero and $3.0 million, respectively, of incentive compensation expense.

Results of Operations

We report and evaluate financial information for two segments: Seismic and Thermal Solutions. As mentioned above, our fiscal year 2009 results evidence the economic slowdown and the decline in energy exploration activities worldwide. Summary financial data by business segment follows (in thousands):

	Three Months Ended						Nine Months Ended
	June 30, 2009			June 30, 2008			June 30, 2009			June 30, 2008
Seismic
Exploration product revenue	$	9,178		$	26,264		$	43,655		$	71,280
Reservoir product and service revenue		6,557			3,452			10,240			12,960
Industrial product revenue		1,625			1,755			5,763			7,867
Total seismic revenues		17,360			31,471			59,658			92,107
Operating income		2,706			8,012			10,337			20,607
Thermal Solutions
Revenue		3,235			3,949			9,904			11,402
Operating income		169			280			349			1,105
Corporate
Revenue		195			170			593			502
Operating loss		(1,666	)		(2,065	)		(5,149	)		(6,199	)
Consolidated Totals
Revenue		20,790			35,590			70,155			104,011
Operating income		1,209			6,227			5,537			15,513

Overview

Three and nine months ended June 30, 2009 compared to three and nine months ended June 30, 2008

Consolidated sales for the three months ended June 30, 2009 decreased by $14.8 million, or 41.6%, from the corresponding period of the prior fiscal year. Consolidated sales for the nine months ended June 30, 2009 decreased by $33.9 million, or 32.6%, from the corresponding period of the prior fiscal year. The decrease in sales for both periods stems from the decline in customer demand for our seismic products as a result of the effects of the worldwide economic slowdown and its impact on energy exploration activities.

Consolidated gross profits for the three months ended June 30, 2009 decreased by $7.1 million, or 49.9%, from the corresponding period of the prior fiscal year. Consolidated gross profits for the nine months ended June 30, 2009 decreased by $13.4 million, or 37.6%, from the corresponding period of the prior fiscal year. The decline in gross profits for both periods was caused by a decline in sales of our products and higher manufacturing costs resulting from unutilized factory capacity.

16

Consolidated operating expenses for the three months ended June 30, 2009 decreased by $2.0 million, or 25.9%, from the corresponding period of the prior fiscal year. Consolidated operating expenses for the nine months ended June 30, 2009 decreased by $4.2 million, or 19.9%, from the corresponding period of the prior fiscal year. Reduced operating expenses reflect initiatives taken by management in response to a decline in sales, and also reflects the impact of reduced incentive compensation expenses caused by lower consolidated pretax profits.

Other income for the three months ended June 30, 2009 increased by $0.1 million due to foreign exchange gains. Other income for the nine months ended June 30, 2009 decreased by $0.6 million primarily because of a $0.5 million foreign exchange loss. These foreign exchange gains and losses occur because U.S. dollar denominated intercompany debts at our foreign subsidiaries were revalued due to strengthening and weakening, respectively, of local currency conditions in Canada and the Russian Federation.

The United States statutory tax rate for the periods ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 was 34.0% and 35.0%, respectively. Our effective tax rates for the three months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 were 22.5% and 30.4%, respectively. Our effective rate for the nine months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 was 31.6% and 31.2%, respectively. These lower effective tax rates primarily resulted from research and experimentation tax credits and the manufacturers’/producers’ deduction.

Seismic Products

Net Sales

Sales of our seismic products for the three months ended June 30, 2009 decreased by $14.1 million, or 44.8%, from the corresponding period of the prior fiscal year. Sales of our seismic products for the nine months ended June 30, 2009 decreased by $32.4 million, or 35.2%, from the corresponding period of the prior fiscal year. The decline in sales for both periods is primarily due to a significant decline in the demand for our seismic exploration products, reflecting a significant reduction in oil and gas exploration and development activities precipitated by the global economic crisis and the rapid decline of oil and gas commodity prices since 2008.

Operating Income

Our operating income associated with sales of our seismic products for the three months ended June 30, 2009 decreased by $5.3 million, or 66.2%, from the corresponding period of the prior fiscal year. Our operating income associated with sales of our seismic products for the nine months ended June 30, 2009 decreased by $10.3 million, or 49.8%, from the corresponding period of the prior fiscal year. These significant declines in our operating income are directly related to the significant decline in our seismic exploration product sales for both periods.

Thermal Solutions Products

Net Sales

Sales of our thermal solutions products for the three months ended June 30, 2009 decreased by $0.7 million, or 18.1%, from the corresponding period of the prior fiscal year. Sales of our thermal solutions products for the nine months ended June 30, 2009 decreased by $1.5 million, or 13.1%, from the corresponding period of the prior fiscal year. The decline in sales for both periods resulted from weaker demand of all thermal product categories due to a weakening economic climate impacting many of our smaller customers in this business segment.

Operating Income

Our operating income associated with sales of our thermal solutions products for the three months ended June 30, 2009 decreased by $0.1 million, or 39.6%, from the corresponding period of the prior fiscal year. Our operating income associated with sales of our thermal imaging products for the nine months ended June 30, 2009 decreased by $0.8 million, or 68.4%, from the corresponding period of the prior fiscal year. The decline in operating income for both periods is directly related to the significant decline in our thermal product sales.

17

Liquidity and Capital Resources

At June 30, 2009, we had $1.6 million in cash and cash equivalents. For the nine months ended June 30, 2009, we generated approximately $10.9 million of cash from operating activities. Sources of cash generated in our operating activities resulted from net income of $3.6 million. Additional sources of cash include net non-cash charges of $5.7 million for deferred income tax expense, depreciation, amortization, stock-based compensation, inventory obsolescence and bad debts. Other sources of cash included a $16.1 million decrease in accounts and notes receivable due to improved collections and lower levels of recent product sales. These sources of cash were offset by (i) a $5.5 million decrease in accrued expenses primarily resulting from a decline in payroll-related costs due to employee headcount reductions and lower incentive compensation costs resulting from lower levels of pretax income, (ii) a $5.2 million decrease in accounts payable due to a recent decline in purchases of raw materials and other expense reductions, and (iii) a $2.2 million increase in inventories resulting from the receipt in our first fiscal quarter of raw materials under purchase commitments and the production of targeted levels of our new wireless data acquisition system. Until recent months, we had been in a period of significant demand for our products as well as the development of new product technologies, which has resulted in a build-up of our inventories to be able to continue to meet actual and anticipated future customer demands. Such increases in our inventory levels have resulted in an increase in our inventory obsolescence expense as the level of obsolete and slow moving inventories increase. Although we reduced our levels of inventories during the three months ended June 30, 2009, the increased level of inventories has put greater demands on our management of inventories, and we continue to give substantial attention to this area.

For the nine months ended June 30, 2009, we used approximately $1.4 million of cash in investing activities for capital expenditures. We estimate that our total capital expenditures in fiscal year 2009 will be less than $2.0 million. The process of converting existing finished goods inventories into rental equipment is not considered a capital expenditure in our cash flow statement. During the nine months ended June 30, 2009, we converted $1.8 million of inventories into rental equipment.

For the nine months ended June 30, 2009, we used approximately $10.0 million of cash in financing activities primarily to eliminate our borrowings under the Credit Agreement, as discussed below.

On November 22, 2004, several of our subsidiaries entered into a credit agreement (the “Original Credit Agreement”) with a bank. The Original Credit Agreement has been amended periodically since 2004, and most recently on April 30, 2009 (as so amended, the “Credit Agreement”). Under the Credit Agreement, our borrower subsidiaries can borrow up to $25.0 million principally secured by their accounts receivable, inventories and equipment. The Credit Agreement expires on April 30, 2011. The Credit Agreement limits the incurrence of additional indebtedness, requires the maintenance of certain financial ratios, restricts our and our subsidiaries’ ability to pay dividends and contains other covenants customary in agreements of this type. We believe the most restrictive covenants in the Credit Agreement are (i) the fixed charge coverage ratio of EBITDA to certain charges, and (ii) the cash flow leverage ratio of total borrowings (excluding real estate borrowings) to adjusted EBITDA. We believe these covenants are more restrictive than covenants contained in the Credit Agreement as in effect prior to the April 30, 2009 amendment, and future borrowings available under the Credit Agreement could be limited or completely restricted if future operating results deteriorate. The interest rate for borrowings under the Credit Agreement is a LIBOR based rate with a margin spread of 300-400 basis points depending upon the maintenance of certain ratios. At June 30, 2009, there were no borrowings under the Credit Agreement, standby letters of credit outstanding in the amount of $0.2 million and additional borrowings available of $24.8 million.

We anticipate that the existing cash balance as of June 30, 2009, cash flow from operations and borrowing availability under the Credit Agreement will provide adequate cash flows and liquidity for the next twelve months to satisfy capital expenditure requirements and scheduled debt payments to fund operations.

Critical Accounting Policies

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires the use of estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. We consider many factors in selecting appropriate operational and financial accounting policies and controls, and in developing the estimates and assumptions that are used in the preparation of

18

these financial statements. We continually evaluate our estimates, including those related to bad debt reserves, inventory obsolescence reserves, self-insurance reserves for medical expenses, product warranty reserves, intangible assets, stock-based compensation and deferred income tax assets. We base our estimates on historical experience and various other factors that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different conditions or assumptions.

Goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price of purchased businesses over the estimated fair value of the acquired business’ net assets. Under the Statement of Financial Accounting Standards, or “SFAS”, 142 “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets” (“SFAS 142”), goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite lives are no longer amortized but are reviewed periodically for impairment. Intangible assets that are not deemed to have indefinite lives will continue to be amortized over their useful lives; however, no maximum life applies. In accordance with the provisions of SFAS 142, we no longer record goodwill amortization expense. We review the carrying value of goodwill to determine whether there has been an impairment. We have elected to make September 30 the annual impairment assessment date and will perform additional interim impairment tests if a change in circumstances occurs that would indicate that the carrying value of goodwill may exceed its fair value amount. Due to the lack of quoted prices for identical items or an independent market analysis, under the SFAS 157 (“Fair Value Measurements”) framework, we estimate the fair market value based on Level 3 inputs using both a market and an income based approach. The goodwill impairment is tested at our Company’s seismic segment level as the goodwill relates to the purchase of seismic related companies. The impairment test uses a weighted average cost of capital. The growth rate is based on the projected inflation rate. The assessment is performed in two steps: step one is to test for potential impairment and if potential losses are identified, step two is to measure the impairment loss. We performed step one at September 30, 2008 and found that there were no impairments at that time; thus, step two was not necessary. In light of the current economy and market conditions, we will continue to determine if an interim test is necessary.

We are required to test for asset impairment relating to property and equipment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of an asset might not be recoverable. We apply SFAS No. 144, “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets” (“SFAS 144”), in order to determine whether or not an asset is impaired. This standard requires an impairment analysis when indicators of impairment are present. If such indicators are present, the standard indicates that if the sum of the future expected cash flows from our assets, undiscounted and without interest charges, is less than the asset’s carrying value, an asset impairment must be recognized in the financial statements. The amount of the impairment is the difference between the fair value of the asset and the carrying value of the asset. In light of the current economy and market conditions, we will continue to determine if an impairment test is necessary.

We primarily derive revenue from the sale, and short-term rental under operating leases, of seismic instruments and equipment and thermal solutions products. We generally recognize sales revenues when our products are shipped and title and risk of loss have passed to the customer. We recognize rental revenues as earned over the rental period. Rentals of our equipment generally range from daily rentals to rental periods of up to nine months or longer. Except for certain of our reservoir characterization products, our products are generally sold without any customer acceptance provisions and our standard terms of sale do not allow customers to return products for credit. In instances where the customer requires a significant performance test for our new and unproven products, we do not recognize the revenue attributable to the product as to which the performance test applies until the performance test is satisfied. Collection of revenue from the sale of large-scale reservoir characterization products may occur at various stages of production or after delivery of the product, and the collected funds are not refundable to the customer.

Most of our products do not require installation assistance or sophisticated instruction. We offer a standard product warranty obligating us to repair or replace equipment with manufacturing defects. We maintain a reserve for future warranty costs based on historical experience or, in the absence of historical experience, management estimates. We record a write-down of inventory when the cost basis of any item (including any estimated future costs to complete the manufacturing process) exceeds its net realizable value.

19

We recognize revenue when all of the following criteria are met:

• Persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists. We operate under a purchase order/contract system for goods sold to customers, and under rental/lease agreements for equipment rentals. These documents evidence that an arrangement exists.

• Delivery has occurred or services have been rendered. For product sales, we do not recognize revenues until delivery has occurred or performance tests are met. For rental revenue, we recognize revenue when earned.

• The seller’s price to the buyer is fixed or determinable. Sales prices are defined in writing in a customer’s purchase order, purchase contract or equipment rental agreement.

• Collectibility is reasonably assured. We evaluate customer credit to ensure collectibility is reasonably assured.

Occasionally, our seismic customers are not able to take immediate delivery of products which were specifically manufactured to the customer’s specifications. These occasions generally occur when customers face logistical issues such as project delays or delays with their seismic crew deployment. In these instances, our customers have asked us to hold the equipment for a short period of time until they can take physical delivery of the product (referred to as “bill and hold” arrangements). We consider the following criteria for recognizing revenue when delivery has not occurred:

• Whether the risks of ownership have passed to the customer,

• Whether we have obtained a fixed commitment to purchase the goods in written documentation from the customer,

• Whether the customer requested that the transaction be on a bill and hold basis and we received that request in writing,

• Whether there is a fixed schedule for delivery of the product,

• Whether we have any specific performance obligations such that the earning process is not complete,

• Whether the equipment is segregated from our other inventory and not subject to being used to fill other orders, and

• Whether the equipment is complete and ready for shipment.

We do not modify our normal billing and credit terms for these types of sales. As of June 30, 2009, we had sales of $1.7 million under bill and hold arrangements.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP FAS No. 115-2 and FAS No. 124-2, “Recognition and Presentation of Other-Than-Temporary Impairments” (“FSP FAS No. 115-2” and “FAS No. 124-2”). FSP FAS No. 115-2 and FAS No. 124-2 change the method for determining whether an other-than-temporary impairment exists for debt securities and the amount of the impairment to be recorded in earnings. FSP FAS No. 115-2 and FAS No. 124-2 are effective for interim and annual periods ending after June 15, 2009. The implementation of these standards did not have a material impact on our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP FAS No. 107-1 and APB Opinion No. 28-1, “Interim Disclosures About Fair Value of Financial Instruments” (“FSP FAS No. 107-1” and “APB No. 28-1”). FSP FAS No. 107-1 and APB No. 28-1 require fair value disclosures in both interim as well as annual financial statements in order to provide more timely information about the effects of current market conditions on financial instruments. FSP FAS No. 107-1 and APB No. 28-1 are effective for interim and annual periods ending after June 15, 2009. As FSP FAS No. 107-1 and APB No. 28-1 relate specifically to disclosures, these standards did not have an impact on our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

In May 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 165, “Subsequent Events” (“SFAS 165”). SFAS 165 requires companies to recognize in their financial statements the effects of subsequent events that provide additional evidence about conditions that existed at the date of the balance sheet, including the estimates inherent in the process of

20

preparing financial statements. An entity shall disclose the date through which subsequent events have been evaluated, as well as whether that date is the date the financial statements were issued. Companies are not permitted to recognize subsequent events that provide evidence about conditions that did not exist at the date of the balance sheet but arose after the balance sheet date and before financial statements are issued. Some nonrecognized subsequent events must be disclosed to keep the financial statements from being misleading. For such events a company must disclose the nature of the event, an estimate of its financial effect, or a statement that such an estimate cannot be made. This Statement applies prospectively for interim and annual financial periods ending after June 15, 2009. The implementation of this standard did not have a material impact on our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 168, “The FASB Accounting Standards Codification and the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles – a replacement of FASB Statement No. 162” (“SFAS 168”). SFAS 168 stipulates the FASB Accounting Standards Codification is the source of authoritative U.S. GAAP recognized by the FASB to be applied by nongovernmental entities. SFAS 168 is effective for financials statements issued for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. The implementation of this standard will not have a material impact on our consolidated financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

21

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

The following discussion of our exposure to various market risks contains “forward-looking” statements that involve risks and uncertainties. These projected results have been prepared utilizing certain assumptions considered reasonable in light of information currently available to us. Nevertheless, because of the inherent unpredictability of foreign currency rates and interest rates, as well as other factors, actual results could differ materially from those projected in this forward looking information.

We do not have any market risk as to market risk sensitive instruments entered into for trading purposes and have only very limited risk as to arrangements entered into other than for trading purposes. Further, we do not engage in commodity or commodity derivative instrument purchasing or selling transactions.

Foreign Currency and Operations Risk

One of our wholly-owned subsidiaries, OYO-GEO Impulse, is located in the Russian Federation. Therefore, our financial results may be affected by factors such as changes in foreign currency exchange rates, weak economic conditions in the Russian Federation or changes in its political climate. Our consolidated balance sheet at June 30, 2009 reflected approximately $6.4 million of net working capital related to OYO-GEO Impulse. For third-party transactions, OYO-GEO Impulse both receives its income and pays its expenses primarily in rubles. To the extent that transactions of OYO-GEO Impulse are settled in rubles, a devaluation of the ruble versus the U.S. dollar could reduce any contribution from OYO-GEO Impulse to our consolidated results of operations and total comprehensive income as reported in U.S. dollars. We do not hedge the market risk with respect to our operations in the Russian Federation; therefore, such risk is a general and unpredictable risk of future disruptions in the valuation of rubles versus U.S. dollars to the extent such disruptions result in any reduced valuation of OYO-GEO Impulse’s net working capital or future contributions to our consolidated results of operations. At June 30, 2009, the foreign exchange rate of the U.S. dollar to the ruble was 1:31.3. If the U.S. dollar versus ruble exchange rate were to decline by ten percent, our working capital could decline by $0.6 million.

Foreign Currency Intercompany Accounts

From time to time, we provide access to capital to our foreign subsidiaries through U.S. dollar denominated interest bearing promissory notes. Such funds are generally used by our foreign subsidiaries to purchase capital assets and for general working capital needs. In addition, we sell products to our foreign subsidiaries in U.S. dollars on trade credit terms. Because these U.S. dollar denominated intercompany debts are accounted for in the local currency of our foreign subsidiaries, any appreciation or devaluation of such foreign currencies against the U.S. dollar will result in a gain or loss, respectively, to our consolidated statement of operations. At June 30, 2009, we had outstanding accounts receivable of $1.7 million from our subsidiary in Canada and $0.2 million from our subsidiary in the Russian Federation. At June 30, 2009, the foreign exchange rate of the U.S. dollar to the Canadian Dollar was 1:1.2 and the foreign exchange rate of the U.S. dollar to the ruble was 1:31.3. If the U.S. dollar exchange rate were to weaken by ten percent against these foreign currencies, we would be subject to foreign exchange losses of approximately $0.2 million in Canada and $20,000 in the Russian Federation.

Floating Interest Rate Risk

The Credit Agreement and the real estate mortgage agreement for our Pinemont facility each contain a floating interest rate. These floating interest rates subject us to the risk of increased interest costs associated with any upward movements in bank market interest rates. Under the Credit Agreement as most recently amended, our borrowing interest rate is a LIBOR based rate plus 300 – 400 basis points. As of June 30, 2009, we had no borrowings outstanding under the Credit Agreement. Under the real estate mortgage agreement our borrowing rate is a LIBOR based rate plus 150 basis points and as of June 30, 2009 we had borrowings of $8.3 million outstanding under this agreement at an effective rate of 1.8%. Due to the amount of borrowings outstanding under the real estate mortgage agreement and potential future borrowings available under the Credit Agreement, any increased interest costs associated with movements in market interest rates could be material to our financial condition, results of operations and/or cash flow. At June 30, 2009, based on our current level of borrowings, a 1.0% increase in interest rates would increase our interest expense annually by approximately $0.1 million.

22

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining a system of disclosure controls and procedures that is designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our reports filed under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified under the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) and Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”). Nevertheless, there can be no assurance that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures will detect or uncover all failures of persons within the Company and its consolidated subsidiaries to report material information otherwise required to be set forth in the Company’s reports.

In connection with the preparation of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, the Company carried out an evaluation under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s management, including the CEO and CFO, as of June 30, 2009 of the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures, as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act. Based on that evaluation, the CEO and CFO concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective.

No changes in the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting occurred during the quarterly period ended June 30, 2009 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting.

23

PART II—OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

Information in response to this item is included in Part I, Item 1 in Note 9 “Legal Proceedings” and is incorporated by reference into Part II of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

Item 1A. Risk Factors

We Have No Generator at the Pinemont Facility

Due to its proximity to the Texas Gulf Coast, our Pinemont facility is annually subject to the threat of hurricanes, and the aftermath that follows. Hurricanes may cause, among other types of damage, the loss of electrical power for extended periods of time. If we lost electrical power at the Pinemont facility, we would be unable to continue our manufacturing and information technology operations during the power outage because we do not own a generator or any other back-up power source large enough to provide for our power consumption needs. A significant disruption in our manufacturing and information technology operations could materially and adversely affect our business operations during an extended period of a power outage.

The Credit Agreement Imposes Restrictions on Our Business

Several of our subsidiaries are borrowers under a credit agreement with a bank. The credit agreement contains covenants and requires maintenance of certain financial ratios and tests, which impose restrictions on our business and on the business of our borrower-subsidiaries. The most recent amendment to the credit agreement further tightened certain of these financial covenants. We currently believe that the most restrictive covenants in the credit agreement are (i) the fixed charge coverage ratio of EBITDA to certain charges, and (ii) the cash flow leverage ratio of total borrowings (excluding real estate borrowings) to adjusted EBITDA. Our ability to comply with these restrictions may be affected by events beyond our control, including, but not limited to, prevailing economic, financial and industry conditions and continuing declines in our sales of products. The breach of any of these covenants or restrictions, as well as any failure to make a payment of interest or principal when due, could result in a default under the credit agreement. Such a default would permit our lender to declare amounts borrowed from it to be due and payable, together with accrued and unpaid interest, and the ability to borrow under the credit agreement could be terminated. If we are unable to repay debt to our lender, the lender could proceed against the collateral securing that debt. While we intend to seek alternative sources of cash in such a situation, there is no guarantee that any alternative cash source would be available, or would be available on terms favorable to us.

Item 6. Exhibits

The following exhibits are filed with this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

31.1	Certification of the Company's Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
31.2	Certification of the Company's Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.1	Certification of the Company's Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.2	Certification of the Company's Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

24

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

		OYO GEOSPACE CORPORATION
Date:	August 7, 2009	By:	/s/ Gary D. Owens
			Gary D. Owens, Chairman of the Board
			President and Chief Executive Officer (duly authorized officer)
Date:	August 7, 2009	By:	/s/ Thomas T. McEntire
			Thomas T. McEntire
			Chief Financial Officer (principal financial officer)

25