XML 39 R22.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.8.0.1
Fair Value Measurement
12 Months Ended
Sep. 30, 2017
Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract]  
Fair Value Measurement
Fair Value Measurement
The Company’s assets and liabilities measured at fair value are summarized in the following tables by fair value measurement Level. See Note 10 for definitions of fair value measures and the Levels within the fair value hierarchy. 
 
 
Fair Value Measurement at September 30, 2017
Description
 
Level 1 
 
Level 2
 
Level 3
 
Total
Assets
 
 
 
 
 
 
Investments
 
$
36

 
$

 
$

 
$
36

Derivatives
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest rate
 

 
10

 

 
10

Foreign exchange
 

 
403

 

 
403

Other
 

 
8

 

 
8

Liabilities
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Derivatives
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest rate
 

 
(122
)
 

 
(122
)
Foreign exchange
 

 
(427
)
 

 
(427
)
Total recorded at fair value
 
$
36

 
$
(128
)
 
$

 
$
(92
)
Fair value of borrowings
 
$

 
$
23,110

 
$
2,764

 
$
25,874

 
 
Fair Value Measurement at October 1, 2016
Description
 
Level 1
 
Level 2
 
Level 3
 
Total
Assets
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Investments
 
$
85

 
$

 
$

 
$
85

Derivatives
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest rate
 

 
132

 

 
132

Foreign exchange
 

 
596

 

 
596

Other
 

 
6

 

 
6

Liabilities
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Derivatives
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest rate
 

 
(13
)
 

 
(13
)
Foreign exchange
 

 
(510
)
 

 
(510
)
Other
 

 
(4
)
 

 
(4
)
Total recorded at fair value
 
$
85

 
$
207

 
$

 
$
292

Fair value of borrowings
 
$

 
$
19,500

 
$
1,579

 
$
21,079


The fair values of Level 2 derivatives are primarily determined by internal discounted cash flow models that use observable inputs such as interest rates, yield curves and foreign currency exchange rates. Counterparty credit risk, which is mitigated by master netting agreements and collateral posting arrangements with certain counterparties, did not have a material impact on derivative fair value estimates.
Level 2 borrowings, which include commercial paper and U.S. medium-term notes, are valued based on quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets.
Level 3 borrowings, which include Asia Theme Park borrowings and other foreign currency denominated borrowings, are generally valued based on historical market transactions, prevailing market interest rates and the Company’s current borrowing cost and credit risk.
The Company’s financial instruments also include cash, cash equivalents, receivables and accounts payable. The carrying values of these financial instruments approximate the fair values.
The Company also has assets that are required to be recorded at fair value on a non-recurring basis when the estimated future cash flows provide indicators that the asset may be impaired. During fiscal 2017 and 2016, the Company recorded film production cost impairment charges of $115 million and $102 million, respectively. At September 30, 2017 and October 1, 2016, the aggregate carrying value of the films for which we prepared the fair value analyses in fiscal 2017 and 2016 was $143 million and $297 million, respectively. The fiscal 2017 and the majority of fiscal 2016 impairment charges are reported in “Cost of services” in the Consolidated Statements of Income. The balance of the fiscal 2016 charges related to the shutdown of certain international film production operations and are reported in “Restructuring and impairment charges” in the Consolidated Statements of Income. The film impairment charges reflected the excess of the unamortized cost of the impaired films over their estimated fair value using discounted cash flows, which is a Level 3 valuation technique.
Credit Concentrations
The Company monitors its positions with, and the credit quality of, the financial institutions that are counterparties to its financial instruments on an ongoing basis and does not currently anticipate nonperformance by the counterparties.
The Company does not expect that it would realize a material loss, based on the fair value of its derivative financial instruments as of September 30, 2017, in the event of nonperformance by any single derivative counterparty. The Company generally enters into derivative transactions only with counterparties that have a credit rating of A- or better and requires collateral in the event credit ratings fall below A- or aggregate exposures exceed limits as defined by contract. In addition, the Company limits the amount of investment credit exposure with any one institution.
The Company does not have material cash and cash equivalent balances with financial institutions that have below investment grade credit ratings. As of September 30, 2017, the Company’s balances with individual financial institutions that exceeded 10% of the Company’s total cash and cash equivalents were 25% of total cash and cash equivalents compared to 34% as of October 1, 2016.
The Company’s trade receivables and financial investments do not represent a significant concentration of credit risk at September 30, 2017 due to the wide variety of customers and markets in which the Company’s products are sold, the dispersion of our customers across geographic areas and the diversification of the Company’s portfolio among financial institutions.