10-Q

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

x QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the Quarterly Period Ended June 30, 2005

OR

¨ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from              to             

Commission file number 0-27812

MEDALLION FINANCIAL CORP.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

DELAWARE	04-3291176
(State of Incorporation)	(IRS Employer Identification No.)

437 MADISON AVENUE, NEW YORK, NEW YORK 10022

(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)

(212) 328-2100

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    YES  x    NO  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    Yes  x    No.  ¨

The number of outstanding shares of registrant’s Common Stock, par value $0.01, as of August 8, 2005 was 17,037,827.

MEDALLION FINANCIAL CORP.

FORM 10-Q

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION		3
	ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS	3
	ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS	18
	ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK	42
	ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES	42
PART II- OTHER INFORMATION		43
	ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS	43
	ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS	43
	ITEM 6. EXHIBITS	43
SIGNATURES		44
CERTIFICATIONS		45

2

PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

BASIS OF PREPARATION

Medallion Financial Corp. (the Company) is a closed-end management investment company organized as a Delaware corporation. The Company has elected to be regulated as a Business Development Company (BDC) under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the 1940 Act). The Company conducts its business through various wholly-owned subsidiaries including its primary taxicab medallion lending company, Medallion Funding Corp. (MFC). The Company also conducts business through Business Lenders, LLC (BLL), licensed under the US Small Business Administration (SBA) Section 7(a) program; Medallion Business Credit, LLC (MBC), an originator of loans to small businesses for the purpose of financing inventory and receivables; Medallion Capital, Inc. (MCI), which conducts a mezzanine financing business; Freshstart Venture Capital Corp. (FSVC), a Small Business Investment Company (SBIC) which originates and services taxicab medallion and commercial loans; and Medallion Bank (MB), a bank regulated by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) and the Utah Department of Financial Institutions to originate taxicab medallion, commercial, and RV/Marine consumer loans, to raise deposits, and to conduct other banking activities. MFC, MCI, and FSVC operate as SBICs and are regulated and financed in part by the SBA.

The financial information is divided into two sections. The first section, Item 1, includes the unaudited consolidated financial statements of the Company including related footnotes. The second section, Item 2, consists of Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations for the six months ended June 30, 2005.

The consolidated balance sheet of the Company as of June 30, 2005, the related consolidated statements of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004, and the consolidated statements of cash flows for the six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004 included in Item 1 have been prepared by the Company, without audit, pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles have been condensed or omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations. In the opinion of management, the accompanying consolidated financial statements include all adjustments, which are of a normal and recurring nature, necessary to summarize fairly the Company’s financial position and results of operations. The results of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004 or for any other interim period may not be indicative of future performance. These financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes thereto included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004.

3

MEDALLION FINANCIAL CORP.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(UNAUDITED)

	Three Months ended June 30,						Six Months ended June 30,
	2005			2004			2005			2004
Interest income on investments	$	13,584,367		$	10,191,928		$	26,102,405		$	16,476,863
Dividends and interest income on short-term investments		440,695			103,960			776,417			199,274
Medallion lease income		112,500			105,000			225,000			210,000
Total investment income		14,137,562			10,400,888			27,103,822			16,886,137
Interest on floating rate borrowings		3,262,543			1,955,355			6,167,243			3,665,355
Interest on fixed rate borrowings		2,608,334			1,701,040			4,924,969			2,888,733
Total interest expense		5,870,877			3,656,395			11,092,212			6,554,088
Net interest income		8,266,685			6,744,493			16,011,610			10,332,049
Gain on sales of loans		375,431			185,163			614,950			398,441
Other income		1,142,481			671,371			1,815,719			1,221,635
Total noninterest income		1,517,912			856,534			2,430,669			1,620,076
Salaries and benefits		2,708,035			2,302,759			5,620,462			4,704,481
Professional fees		482,121			549,073			987,378			1,003,605
Other operating expenses		2,156,655			2,175,953			4,079,966			3,687,560
Total operating expenses		5,346,811			5,027,785			10,687,806			9,395,646
Net investment income before income taxes		4,437,786			2,573,242			7,754,473			2,556,479
Income tax provision		684,371			1,062,997			1,241,032			1,108,097
Net investment income after income taxes		3,753,415			1,510,245			6,513,441			1,448,382
Net realized gains (losses) on investments		(682,815	)		(315,328	)		1,365,072			(514,562	)
Net change in unrealized depreciation on investments		(2,623,257	)		(946,054	)		(5,195,493	)		(2,064,646	)
Net realized/unrealized loss on investments		(3,306,072	)		(1,261,382	)		(3,830,421	)		(2,579,208	)
Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations	$	447,343		$	248,863		$	2,683,020		$	(1,130,826	)
Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations per common share
Basic	$	0.03		$	0.01		$	0.16		$	(0.06	)
Diluted		0.03			0.01			0.15			(0.06	)
Dividends declared per share	$	0.13		$	0.08		$	.25		$	0.16
Weighted average common shares outstanding
Basic		16,969,568			18,141,427			17,063,025			18,179,524
Diluted		17,413,963			18,540,419			17,507,421			18,179,524

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

4

MEDALLION FINANCIAL CORP.

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(UNAUDITED)

	June 30, 2005			December 31, 2004
Assets
Medallion loans, at fair value	$	423,798,555		$	392,131,108
Commercial loans, at fair value		155,765,264			136,834,891
Consumer loans, at fair value		76,628,773			66,330,748
Equity investments, at fair value		28,373,891			33,645,424
Investment securities, at fair value		18,285,207			14,598,837
Net investments ($352,333,000 at June 30, 2005 and $312,330,000 at December 31, 2004 pledged as collateral under borrowing arrangements)	$	702,851,690			643,541,008
Cash ($713,000 at June 30, 2005 and $690,000 at December 31, 2004 restricted as to use by lender)		28,890,009			37,267,122
Accrued interest receivable		3,098,653			3,062,608
Servicing fee receivable		2,154,128			2,312,040
Fixed assets, net		922,963			991,901
Goodwill, net		5,007,583			5,007,583
Other assets, net		18,075,818			17,727,362
Total assets	$	761,000,844		$	709,909,624
Liabilities
Accounts payable and accrued expenses	$	10,937,179		$	11,756,337
Accrued interest payable		2,036,404			1,758,956
Floating rate borrowings		309,909,102			274,959,911
Fixed rate borrowings		272,147,126			250,973,035
Total liabilities		595,029,811			539,448,239
Shareholders’ equity
Preferred Stock (1,000,000 shares of $0.01 par value stock authorized - none outstanding, issued 18,400,512 shares at June 30, 2005 and 18,328,450 shares at December 31, 2004.)					—
Common stock (50,000,000 shares of $0.01 par value stock authorized)		183,807			183,077
Treasury stock at cost (1,373,351 shares at June 30, 2005 and 983,451 shares at December 31, 2004)		(12,611,113	)		(9,002,382	)
Capital in excess of par value		174,519,085			174,095,094
Accumulated net investment income		3,879,254			5,185,596
Total shareholders’ equity		165,971,033			170,461,385
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity	$	761,000,844		$	709,909,624
Number of common shares outstanding		17,027,161			17,344,999
Net asset value per share	$	9.75		$	9.83

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

5

MEDALLION FINANCIAL CORP.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(UNAUDITED)

	Six Months ended June 30,
	2005			2004
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations	$	2,683,020		$	(1,130,826	)
Adjustments to reconcile net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations to net cash provided by (used for) operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization		339,445			330,441
Amortization of origination costs		751,219			817,646
Increase in net unrealized (appreciation) depreciation on investments		5,195,493			(248,713	)
Net realized (gains) losses on investments		(1,365,072	)		514,562
Gains on sales of loans		(614,950	)		(398,441	)
Increase in unrealized depreciation on MTM		—			2,313,359
Increase in accrued interest receivable		(36,045	)		(292,325	)
Decrease in servicing fee receivable		157,912			202,839
(Increase) decrease in other assets, net		3,284,236			(172,953	)
Increase (decrease) in accounts payable and accrued expenses		(738,881	)		1,702,421
Decrease in accrued interest payable		197,171			135,798
Net cash provided by operating activities		9,853,547			3,773,808
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Investments originated		(197,119,959	)		(145,667,454	)
Purchase of RV/Marine loan portfolio		—			(87,213,656	)
Proceeds from principal receipts, sales, and maturities of investments		130,124,352			71,831,448
Investments in and loans to MTM, net		—			(1,304,175	)
Capital expenditures		(270,507	)		(87,999	)
Net cash used for investing activities		(67,266,114	)		(162,441,836	)
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Proceeds from floating rate borrowings		70,028,731			80,757,736
Repayments of floating rate borrowings		(35,079,425	)		(92,882,054	)
Proceeds from fixed rate borrowings		94,084,000			167,199,268
Repayments of fixed rate borrowings		(72,909,909	)		—
Proceeds from exercise of stock options		424,719			119,900
Payments of declared dividends		(3,903,930	)		(2,725,617	)
Purchase of treasury stock at cost		(3,608,732	)		(1,012,607	)
Net cash provided by financing activities		49,035,454			151,456,426
NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH		(8,377,113	)		(7,211,602	)
CASH, beginning of year		37,267,122			47,675,537
CASH, end of period	$	28,890,009		$	40,463,935
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION
Cash paid during the year for interest	$	9,836,041		$	5,382,887
Cash paid during the year for income taxes		543,000			45,000
Non-cash investing activities-net transfers to (from) other assets		4,396,009			1,721,600

The accompanying notes are in integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

6

MEDALLION FINANCIAL CORP.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

JUNE 30, 2005

(1) ORGANIZATION OF MEDALLION FINANCIAL CORP. AND ITS SUBSIDIARIES

Medallion Financial Corp. (the Company) is a closed-end management investment company organized as a Delaware corporation. The Company has elected to be regulated as a Business Development Company (BDC) under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the 1940 Act). The Company conducts its business through various wholly-owned subsidiaries including its primary operating company, Medallion Funding Corp. (MFC), a Small Business Investment Company (SBIC) which originates and services taxicab medallion and commercial loans. As an adjunct to the Company’s taxicab medallion finance business, the Company had wholly owned portfolio investments which conducted taxicab rooftop advertising through two subsidiaries, the primary operator Medallion Taxi Media, Inc. (Media), and a small operating subsidiary in Japan (MMJ), (together MTM). During the 2004 third quarter, Media was merged with and into a subsidiary of Clear Channel Communications, Inc. (CCU), and MMJ was sold in a stock sale to its management. (See Note 3).

The Company also conducts business through Business Lenders, LLC (BLL), licensed under the Small Business Administration (SBA) Section 7(a) program; Medallion Business Credit, LLC (MBC), an originator of loans to small businesses for the purpose of financing inventory and receivables; Medallion Capital, Inc. (MCI), an SBIC which conducts a mezzanine financing business; Freshstart Venture Capital Corp. (FSVC), an SBIC which originates and services taxicab medallion and commercial loans; and Medallion Bank (MB), a Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) insured industrial bank that primarily originates medallion loans, commercial loans, and consumer loans, raises deposits, and conducts other banking activities. MFC, MCI, and FSVC, as SBICs, are regulated and financed in part by the SBA.

On February 28, 2005, the Company entered into an agreement to sell substantially all of the assets of BLL to a subsidiary of Merrill Lynch & Co. Under the terms of the agreement, the Company will receive book value for the assets and will receive payment for all intercompany funding provided, in total, approximately $20,000,000. The transaction has been approved by the Connecticut State Banking Department, is subject to the approval of the SBA, and is expected to close in approximately 60 days.

MB was capitalized on December 16, 2003, with $22,000,000 from the Company. On December 22, 2003, upon satisfaction of the conditions set forth in the FDIC’s order of October 2, 2003 approving MB’s application for federal deposit insurance, the FDIC certified that the deposits of each depositor in MB were insured to the maximum amount provided by the Federal Deposit Insurance Act and MB opened for business. MB is subject to competition from other financial institutions and to the regulations of certain federal and state agencies, and undergoes examinations by those agencies.

MB is a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company and was initially formed for the primary purpose of originating commercial loans in three categories: 1) loans to finance the purchase of taxicab medallions (licenses), 2) asset-based commercial loans and 3) SBA 7(a) loans. The loans are marketed and serviced by MB’s affiliates who have extensive prior experience in these asset groups. Additionally, MB began issuing brokered certificates of deposit in January 2004, and purchased over $84,150,000 of taxicab medallion and asset-based loans from affiliates of the Company. Additionally, on April 1, 2004, MB purchased a consumer loan portfolio with a principal amount of $84,875,000, net of $4,244,000, or 5.0%, of unrealized depreciation, from an unrelated financial institution for consideration of $86,309,000. The purchase was funded with $7,700,000 of additional capital contributed by the Company and with deposits raised by MB. The purchase included a premium of approximately $5,678,000 to the book value of assets acquired, which is amortized to interest income over the expected life of the acquired loans, and which is carried in other assets on the consolidated balance sheets.

In June 2003, MFC established several wholly-owned subsidiaries which, along with an existing subsidiary (together, Medallion Chicago), purchased certain City of Chicago taxicab medallions which are leased to fleet operators while being held for long-term appreciation in value.

In September 2002, MFC established a wholly-owned subsidiary, Taxi Medallion Loan Trust I (Trust), for the purpose of owning medallion loans originated by MFC or others. The Trust is a separate legal and corporate entity with its own creditors who, in any liquidation of the Trust, will be entitled to be satisfied out of the Trust’s assets prior to any value in the Trust becoming available to the Trust’s equity holders. The assets of the Trust, aggregating $321,106,000 at June 30, 2005 and $280,414,000 at December 31, 2004, are not available to pay obligations of its affiliates or any other party, and the assets of affiliates or any other party are not available to pay obligations of the Trust. The Trust’s loans are serviced by MFC.

7

(2) SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Use of Estimates

The accounting and reporting policies of the Company conform with accounting principles generally accepted in the US and general practices in the investment company industry. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles in the US requires the Company to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reporting and disclosure of assets and liabilities, including those that are of a contingent nature, at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Such estimates are subject to change over time, and actual results could differ from those estimates. The determination of fair value of the Company’s investments is subject to significant change within one year.

Principles of Consolidation

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries, except for MTM. All significant intercompany transactions, balances, and profits have been eliminated in consolidation. As non-investment companies, MTM could not be consolidated with the Company, which is an investment company under the 1940 Act. See Note 3 for the presentation of financial information for MTM.

Investment Valuation

The Company’s loans, net of participations and any unearned discount, are considered investments under the 1940 Act and are recorded at fair value. Loans are valued at cost adjusted for any unrealized appreciation (depreciation). Since no ready market exists for these loans, the fair value is determined in good faith by management, and approved by the Board of Directors. In determining the fair value, the Company and Board of Directors consider factors such as the financial condition of the borrower, the adequacy of the collateral, individual credit risks, historical loss experience, and the relationships between current and projected market rates and portfolio rates of interest and maturities. The Company’s consumer portfolio purchase was net of unrealized depreciation of $4,244,000, or 5.0% of the balances outstanding, and included a purchase premium of approximately $5,678,000. Adjustments to the fair value of this portfolio are based on the historical loan loss data obtained from the seller, adjusted for changes in delinquency trends and other factors as described above.

Equity investments (common stock and stock warrants) and investment securities (mortgage backed bonds), representing 4% and 3%, respectively, of the investment portfolio, are recorded at fair value, represented as cost, plus or minus unrealized appreciation or depreciation, respectively. The fair value of investments that have no ready market are determined in good faith by management, and approved by the Board of Directors, based upon assets and revenues of the underlying investee companies as well as general market trends for businesses in the same industry. Included in equity investments at June 30, 2005 are marketable and non-marketable securities of $24,632,000 and $3,742,000, respectively. At December 31, 2004, the respective balances were $29,926,000 and $3,719,000, respectively. Because of the inherent uncertainty of valuations, management’s estimates of the values of the investments may differ significantly from the values that would have been used had a ready market for the investments existed, and the differences could be material.

The Company’s investments consist primarily of long-term loans to persons defined by SBA regulations as socially or economically disadvantaged, or to entities that are at least 50% owned by such persons. Approximately 60% and 61% of the Company’s investment portfolio at June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004, respectively, had arisen in connection with the financing of taxicab medallions, taxicabs, and related assets, of which 79% and 78% were in New York City. These loans are secured by the medallions, taxicabs, and related assets, and are personally guaranteed by the borrowers, or in the case of corporations, are generally guaranteed personally by the owners. A portion of the Company’s portfolio (22%) represents loans to various commercial enterprises, in a variety of industries, including wholesaling, food services, financing, broadcasting, communications, real estate, and lodging. These loans are made primarily in the metropolitan New York City area, and include loans guaranteed by the SBA under its Section 7(a) program, less the sale of the guaranteed portion of those loans. Funding for the Section 7(a) program depends on annual appropriations by the US Congress. Approximately 11% of the Company’s portfolio consists of consumer loans in all 50 states collateralized by recreational vehicles, boats, and trailers.

8

Investment Transactions and Income Recognition

Loan origination fees and certain direct origination costs are deferred and recognized as an adjustment to the yield of the related loans. At June 30, 2005, December 31, 2004, and June 30, 2004 net origination costs totaled approximately $2,300,000, $1,755,000, and $1,733,000. Amortization expense for the quarters ended June 30, 2005 and 2004 was $137,000 and $527,000, and was $751,000 and $818,000 for the comparable six month periods.

Investment securities are purchased from time-to-time in the open market at prices that are greater or lesser than the par value of the investment. The resulting premium or discount is deferred and recognized as an adjustment to the yield of the related investment. At June 30, 2005, the net premium on investment securities totaled $617,000, and amortization expense for the 2005 second quarter and six months was $34,000 and $64,000. At June 30, 2004, the net premium on investment securities totaled $199,000, and amortization expense for both the 2004 second quarter and six months was $20,000.

Interest income is recorded on the accrual basis. Taxicab medallion and commercial loans are placed on nonaccrual status, and all uncollected accrued interest is reversed, when there is doubt as to the collectibility of interest or principal, or if loans are 90 days or more past due, unless management has determined that they are both well-secured and in the process of collection. Interest income on nonaccrual loans is generally recognized when cash is received, unless a determination has been made to apply all cash receipts to principal. At June 30, 2005, December 31, 2004, and June 30, 2004, total nonaccrual loans were approximately $25,972,000, $28,523,000, and $27,511,000, and represented 4%, 5%, and 6% of the gross medallion and commercial loan portfolio, respectively. The amount of interest income on nonaccrual loans that would have been recognized if the loans had been paying in accordance with their original terms was approximately $5,210,000, $6,016,000, and $4,922,000 as of June 30, 2005, December 31, 2004, and June 30, 2004, of which $743,000 and $739,000 would have been recognized in the quarters ended June 30, 2005 and 2004, and $1,856,000 and $1,392,000 would have been recognized in the comparable six months periods.

The consumer portfolio has different characteristics compared to commercial loans, typified by a larger number of lower dollar loans that have similar characteristics. As a result, these loans are not typically placed on nonaccrual, but are charged off in their entirety when deemed uncollectible, or when they become 120 days past due, whichever occurs first, at which time appropriate collection and recovery efforts against both the borrower and the underlying collateral are initiated.

Loan Sales and Servicing Fee Receivable

The Company accounts for its sales of loans in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 140, “Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities- a Replacement of FASB Statement No. 125” (SFAS 140). SFAS 140 provides accounting and reporting standards for transfers and servicing of financial assets and extinguishments of liabilities. The principal portion of loans serviced for others by the Company was approximately $108,225,000, $123,166,000, and $140,184,000 at June 30, 2005, December 31, 2004, and June 30, 2004.

Gain or losses on loan sales are primarily attributable to the sale of commercial loans which have been at least partially guaranteed by the SBA. The Company recognizes gains or losses from the sale of the SBA-guaranteed portion of a loan at the date of the sales agreement when control of the future economic benefits embodied in the loan is surrendered. The gains are calculated in accordance with SFAS 140, which requires that the gain on the sale of a portion of a loan be based on the relative fair values of the loan portion sold and the loan portion retained. The gain on loan sales is due to the differential between the carrying amount of the portion of loans sold and the sum of the cash received and the servicing fee receivable. The servicing fee receivable represents the present value of the difference between the servicing fee received by the Company (generally 100 to 400 basis points) and adequate compensation (servicing costs and normal profit), after considering the estimated effects of prepayments and defaults over the life of the servicing agreement. In connection with calculating the servicing fee receivable, the Company must make certain assumptions relating to the cost of servicing a loan including a normal profit, the estimated life of the underlying loan that will be serviced, and the discount rate used in the present value calculation. The Company considers 40 basis points to be its cost plus a normal profit and uses the note rate plus 100 basis points for loans with an original maturity of ten years or less, and the note rate plus 200 basis points for loans with an original maturity of greater than ten years as the discount rate. The note rate is generally the prime rate plus 2.75%.

The servicing fee receivable is amortized as a charge to loan servicing fee income over the estimated lives of the underlying loans using the effective interest rate method. The Company reviews the carrying amount of the servicing fee receivable for possible impairment by stratifying the receivables based on one or more of the predominant risk characteristics

9

of the underlying financial assets. The Company has stratified its servicing fee receivable into pools, generally by the year of creation, and within those pools, by the term of the loan underlying the servicing fee receivable. If the estimated present value of the future servicing income is less than the carrying amount, the Company establishes an impairment reserve and adjusts future amortization accordingly. If the fair value exceeds the carrying value, the Company may reduce future amortization. The servicing fee receivable is carried at the lower of amortized cost or fair value.

The estimated net servicing income is based, in part, on management’s estimate of prepayment speeds, including default rates, and accordingly, there can be no assurance of the accuracy of these estimates. If the prepayment speeds occur at a faster rate than anticipated, the amortization of the servicing asset will be accelerated and its value will decline; and as a result, servicing income during that and subsequent periods would decline. If prepayments occur slower than anticipated, cash flows would exceed estimated amounts and servicing income would increase. The constant prepayment rates utilized by the Company in estimating the lives of the loans depend on the original term of the loan, industry trends, and the Company’s historical data on prepayments and delinquencies, and range from 15% to 35%. The Company evaluates the temporary impairment to determine if any such temporary impairment would be considered to be permanent in nature. The prepayment rate of loans may be affected by a variety of economic and other factors, including prevailing interest rates and the availability of alternative financing to borrowers.

The activity in the reserve for servicing fee receivable follows:

	2005			2004
Balance at December 31,	$	1,036,500		$	1,037,500
Reductions charged to operations		(38,500	)		—
Other		—			(1,000	)
Balance at March 31,		998,000			1,036,500
Activity during the second quarter		38,500			—
Balance at June 30,	$	1,036,500		$	1,036,500

The Company also has the option to sell the unguaranteed portions of loans to third party investors. The gain or loss on such sales is calculated in accordance with SFAS No. 140. The discount related to unguaranteed portions sold would be reversed, and the Company would recognize a servicing fee receivable or liability based on servicing fees retained by the Company. The Company is required to retain at least 5% of loans sold under the SBA Section 7(a) program. The Company had no sales of unguaranteed portions of loans to third party for the quarters or six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004.

Unrealized Appreciation (Depreciation) and Realized Gains (Losses) on Investments

The change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments is the amount by which the fair value estimated by the Company is greater (less) than the carrying amount of the investment portfolio. Realized gains or losses on investments are generated through sales of investments, foreclosure on specific collateral, and writeoffs of loans or assets acquired in satisfaction of loans, net of recoveries. Unrealized depreciation on net investments (which excludes MTM and foreclosed properties) was $13,022,000, $11,261,000, and $11,575,000 as of June 30, 2005, December 31, 2004, and June 30, 2004, respectively. The Company’s investment in MTM, as wholly-owned portfolio investments, was also subject to quarterly assessments of its fair value. The Company used MTM’s actual results of operations as the best estimate of changes in its fair value, and recorded the result as a component of unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments. See Note 3 for the presentation of financial information for MTM.

10

The following table sets forth the changes in the Company’s unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on net investments during the quarters shown below.

	Loans			Equity Investments			Total
Balance December 31, 2003(1)	$	(7,917,791	)	$	287,045		$	(7,630,746	)
Increase in unrealized
Depreciation on investments		(205,957	)		17,397			(188,560	)
Reversal of unrealized depreciation related to realized
Losses on investments		239,810			7,589			247,399
Balance March 31, 2004 (1)		(7,883,938	)		312,031			(7,571,907	)
Increase in unrealized
Appreciation on investments		—			81,400			81,400
Depreciation on investments (3)		(497,406	)		(38,421	)		(535,827	)
Reversal of unrealized appreciation (depreciation) related to realized
Losses on investments		694,909			—			694,909
RV/Marine Reserve (2)		(4,243,854	)		—			(4,243,854	)
Balance June 30, 2004 (1)	$	(11,930,289	)	$	355,010		$	(11,575,279	)
	Loans			Equity Investments			Total
Balance December 31, 2004 (1)	$	(11,897,572	)	$	636,139		$	(11,261,433	)
Increase in unrealized
Appreciation on investments (3)		—			714,744			714,744
Depreciation on investments		(1,263,442	)		—			(1,263,442	)
Reversal of unrealized (appreciation) depreciation related to realized
Losses on investments		887,795			—			887,795
Balance March 31, 2005 (1)		(12,273,219	)		1,350,883			(10,922,336	)
Increase in unrealized
Depreciation on investments (3)		94,061			(2,680,744	)		(2,586,683	)
Reversal of unrealized appreciation (depreciation) related to realized
Losses on investments		485,617			—			485,617
Other		1,450			—			1,450
Balance June 30, 2005 (1)	$	(11,692,091	)	$	(1,329,861	)	$	(13,021,952	)

(1) Excludes unrealized depreciation of $1,007,695, $747,281, $512,281, $50,606, $0, and $317,361 on foreclosed properties at June 30, 2005, March 31, 2005, December 31, 2004, June 30, 2004, March 31,2004, and December 31, 2003, respectively.

(2) Reflects the difference between the purchase price of the portfolio and the actual nominal value of the loan contracts acquired.

(3) Includes $20,184 and $45,847 of depreciation on investment securities in the 2005 second and first quarters, respectively, and $11,069 of appreciation in the 2004 second quarter.

11

The table below summarizes components of unrealized/realized gains and losses in the investment portfolio.

	Three months ended						Six months ended
	June 30, 2005			June 30, 2004			June 30, 2005			June 30, 2004
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments
Unrealized appreciation	$	—		$	81,400		$	50,517		$	81,400
Unrealized depreciation		(2,816,435	)		(535,827	)		(3,415,647	)		(724,387	)
Unrealized depreciation on MTM		—			(1,135,930	)		—			(2,313,359	)
Realized gains		(179	)		—			(2,676,512	)		—
Realized losses		518,834			694,909			1,406,626			942,306
Unrealized losses on foreclosed properties		(325,477	)		(50,606	)		(560,477	)		(50,606	)
Total	$	(2,623,257	)	$	(946,054	)	$	(5,195,493	)	$	(2,064,646	)
Net realized gains (losses) on investments
Realized gains	$	179		$	315,913		$	2,676,512		$	315,913
Realized losses		(872,800	)		(694,909	)		(1,760,595	)		(942,306	)
Direct recoveries (charge offs)		254,869			58,668			466,571			76,934
Other gains		—			—			99,879			—
Realized gains (losses) on foreclosed properties		(65,063	)		5,000			(117,295	)		34,897
Total	$	(682,815	)	$	(315,328	)	$	1,365,072		$	(514,562	)

Goodwill

Effective January 1, 2002, coincident with the adoption of SFAS No.142, “ Goodwill and Intangible Assets,” the Company tests its goodwill for impairment, and engages a consultant to help management evaluate its carrying value. The results of this evaluation demonstrated no impairment in goodwill. The Company conducts annual appraisals of its goodwill, and will recognize any impairment in the period the impairment is identified.

Fixed Assets

Fixed assets are carried at cost less accumulated depreciation and amortization, and are depreciated on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives of 3 to 10 years. Leasehold improvements are amortized on a straight-line basis over the shorter of the lease term or the estimated economic useful life of the improvement. Depreciation and amortization expense was $212,000 and $174,000 for the 2005 and 2004 second quarters, and was $339,000 and $330,000 for the comparable six months.

Deferred Costs

Deferred financing costs, included in other assets, represents costs associated with obtaining the Company’s borrowing facilities, and is amortized over the lives of the related financing agreements. Amortization expense was $549,000 and $521,000 for the quarters ended June 30, 2005 and 2004, and $1,059,000 and $1,022,000 for the comparable six month periods, respectively. In addition, the Company capitalizes certain costs for transactions in the process of completion, including those for acquisitions and the sourcing of other financing alternatives, and during 2004 was increased by the purchase premium paid on the consumer portfolio purchase of $5,678,000, of which $423,000 and $807,000 was amortized into interest income during the 2005 second quarter and six months, and $391,000 was amortized in each of the comparable 2004 periods. Upon completion or termination of the transaction, any accumulated amounts will be amortized against income over an appropriate period, capitalized as goodwill, or written off. The amounts on the balance sheet for all of these purposes were $6,352,000 and $7,460,000 as of June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004.

Federal Income Taxes

Traditionally, the Company and each of its corporate subsidiaries other than Media and MB (the RIC subsidiaries) have qualified to be treated for federal income tax purposes as regulated investment companies (RICs) under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the Code). As RICs, the Company and each of the RIC subsidiaries are not subject to US federal income tax on any gains or investment company taxable income (which includes, among other things, dividends and interest income reduced by deductible expenses) that it distributes to its shareholders, if at least 90% of its investment company taxable income for that taxable year is distributed. It is the Company’s and the RIC subsidiaries’ policy to comply with the provisions of the Code.

12

Media and MB are not RICs and are taxed as regular corporations. For 2004, Media will file a partial year tax return covering the period prior to the merger with CCU. The Trust is not subject to federal income taxation. Instead, the Trust’s taxable income is treated as having been earned by MFC.

During the 2004 second quarter, BLL changed its tax status from that of a disregarded “pass-through” entity of the Company to that of a company taxable as a corporation. For 2005 and 2004, BLL has no tax liability as a result of this election. The Company believes it has made adequate provision for potential tax assessments resulting from its activities.

Net Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets Resulting from Operations per Share (EPS)

Basic earnings per share are computed by dividing net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations available to common shareholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted earnings per share reflect the potential dilution that could occur if option contracts to issue common stock were exercised, and has been computed after giving consideration to the weighted average dilutive effect of the Company’s common stock and stock options. The Company uses the treasury stock method to calculate diluted EPS, which is a method of recognizing the use of proceeds that could be obtained upon exercise of options and warrants in computing diluted EPS. It assumes that any proceeds would be used to purchase common stock at the average market price during the period. The table below shows the calculation of basic and diluted EPS.

	June 30, 2005						June 30, 2004
Three months ended			# of Shares	EPS						# of Shares	EPS
Net increase in net assets resulting from operations available to common shareholders	$	447,343					$	248,863
Basic EPS
Income available to common shareholders	$	447,343	16,969,568	$	0.03		$	248,863		18,141,427	$	0.01
Effect of dilutive stock options			444,395		—					398,992		—
Diluted EPS
Income available to common shareholders	$	447,343	17,413,963	$	0.03		$	248,863		18,540,419	$	0.01
	June 30, 2005						June 30, 2004
Six months ended			# of Shares	EPS						# of Shares	EPS
Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations available to common shareholders	$	2,683,020					$	(1,130,826	)
Basic EPS
Income (loss) available to common shareholders	$	2,683,020	17,063,025	$	0.16		$	(1,130,826	)	18,179,524	$	(0.06	)
Effect of dilutive stock options (1)		—	444,396		(0.01	)		—		—		—
Diluted EPS
Income (loss) available to common shareholders	$	2,683,020	17,507,421	$	0.15		$	(1,130,826	)	18,179,524	$	(0.06	)

(1) Because there were net losses in the 2004 six months, the effect of the stock options is antidilutive, and therefore is not presented.

Derivatives

The Company had no interest rate cap agreements or other derivative investments outstanding during 2005 and 2004.

13

Reclassifications

Certain reclassifications have been made to prior year balances to conform with the current year presentation.

(3) INVESTMENT IN AND LOANS TO MTM

On September 3, 2004, Media entered into a merger agreement with CCU, whereby 100% of the Company’s investment in Media was exchanged on a tax deferred basis for 933,521 shares of CCU stock (NYSE: CCU) and a cash payment of $1,477,000, resulting in an unrealized gain of approximately $23,512,000 and a realized gain of approximately $1,477,000, after costs associated with completing the merger, including costs accrued for potential contractual purchase accounting adjustments in the 2004 third quarter. Additionally, during the 2004 third quarter, the Company sold its investment in MMJ to MMJ’s management team for $1,600,000, which after considering all sales costs, resulted in a gain on sale of approximately $255,000 in the 2004 third quarter.

The following table presents MTM’s combined statements of operations for three and six months ended June 30, 2004. As a result of the sale of MTM during the 2004 third quarter, there is no balance sheet for MTM as of June 30, 2005 or December 31, 2004.

	Three Months ended June 30, 2004			Six Months ended June 30, 2004
Advertising revenue	$	1,497,074		$	3,210,434
Cost of fleet services		1,267,086			2,572,122
Gross profit		229,988			638,312
Depreciation and other non cash adjustments		184,889			569,961
Other operating expenses		1,256,133			2,456,030
Loss from operations		(1,211,034	)		(2,387,679	)
Income tax provision		985			1,768
Net loss	$	(1,212,019	)	$	(2,389,447	)

The Company charged Media $34,621 and $76,212 in the three and six months ended June 30, 2004 for salaries and benefits and corporate overhead paid by the Company on Media’s behalf. During 2004, these amounts owed by Media and MMJ to the Company were contributed to Media and MMJ as equity.

In July 2001, through its subsidiary MMJ, the Company acquired certain assets and assumed certain liabilities of a taxi advertising operation similar to those operated by Media in the US, which had advertising rights on approximately 4,800 cabs servicing various cities in Japan. The terms of the agreement provided for an earn-out payment to the sellers based on average net income over the next three years. MMJ accounted for 5% of MTM’s combined revenue during 2004.

(4) FLOATING RATE BORROWINGS

The outstanding balances of floating rate borrowings were as follows:

	Payments Due By Period
Dollars in thousands	2005		2006		2007		2008		2009		Thereafter		June 30, 2005		December 31, 2004		Interest Rate(1)
Revolving line of credit	$	—	$	284,057	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	284,057	$	249,957	3.76	%
Notes payable to banks		10,840		1,505		1,507		—		—		—		13,852		15,003	5.98
Margin loan		12,000		—		—		—		—		—		12,000		10,000	4.01
Total	$	22,840	$	285,562	$	1,507	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	309,909	$	274,960	3.87

(1) Weighted average contractual rate as of June 30, 2005.

(A) REVOLVING LINE OF CREDIT

In September 2002, and as renegotiated in September 2003 and January 2005, the Trust entered into a revolving line of credit agreement (amended) with Merrill Lynch Commercial Finance Corp., as successor to Merrill Lynch Bank, USA (MLB) to provide up to $325,000,000 of financing to acquire medallion loans from MFC (MLB line). Borrowings under the

14

Trust’s revolving line of credit are collateralized by the Trust’s assets. MFC is the servicer of the loans owned by the Trust. The MLB line includes a borrowing base covenant and rapid amortization in certain circumstances. In addition, if certain financial tests are not met, MFC can be replaced as the servicer. The MLB line matures in September 2006. The interest rate is generally LIBOR plus 0.75% with an unused facility fee of 0.375% on unused amounts up to $250,000,000, effective January 2005, and was LIBOR plus 1.25% and 0.125%, previously. The facility fee was $900,000 in September 2004 and $300,000 in September 2005.

(B) NOTES PAYABLE TO BANKS AND MARGIN LOAN

On January 25, 2005, MFC entered into a $4,000,000 revolving note agreement with Atlantic Bank of New York that matures on December 1, 2005. The line is secured by medallion loans of MFC that are in process of being sold to the Trust, any draws being payable from the receipt of proceeds from the sale. The line bears interest at the prime rate minus 0.25%, payable monthly. As of June 30, 2005, $0 had been drawn down under this line.

In November, 2004, the Company entered into a margin loan agreement with Bear Stearns, & Co., Inc. The margin loan is secured by the pledged stock of CCU held by the Company, and is generally available at 60% of the current fair market value of the CCU stock, or $13,613,000 as of June 30, 2005. The margin loan bears interest at the federal funds rate plus 0.75%. As of June 30, 2005, $12,000,000 had been drawn down under this margin loan.

On April 26, 2004, the Company entered into a $15,000,000 revolving note agreement with Sterling National Bank that matured on April 25, 2005, and which maturity was extended by Sterling National Bank for 60 days. On June 28 2005, the maturity date was further extended to July 31, 2005 (see Note 10). The line is secured by certain pledged assets of the Company and MBC, and is subject to periodic borrowing base requirements. The line bears interest at the prime rate, payable monthly, and is subject to an unused fee of 0.125%. As of June 30, 2005, $10,700,000 had been drawn down under this line.

On July 11, 2003 certain operating subsidiaries of MFC entered into an aggregate $1,700,000 of note agreements with Atlantic Bank of New York and Israel Discount Bank, collateralized by certain taxicab medallions owned by Medallion Chicago of which $1,417,000 was outstanding at June 30, 2005. The notes mature July 8, 2006 and bear interest at LIBOR plus 2%, adjusted annually, payable monthly. Principal and interest payments of $17,000 are due monthly, with the balance due at maturity.

On June 30, 2003, an operating subsidiary of MFC entered into a $2,000,000 note agreement with Banco Popular North America, collateralized by certain taxicab medallions owned by Medallion Chicago, of which $1,734,000 was outstanding at June 30, 2005. The note matures June 1, 2007 and bears interest at Banco Popular’s prime rate less 0.25%, adjusted annually, payable monthly. Principal and interest payments of $18,000 are due monthly, with the balance due at maturity.

On April 30, 2003, the Company entered into a $7,000,000 note agreement with Atlantic Bank of New York, collateralized by certain assets of MBC. The note was paid in full during the 2004 first quarter. The note had a maturity of May 1, 2004 and bore interest at Atlantic Bank’s prime rate plus 0.25%, payable monthly. Principal was due at maturity.

(5) FIXED RATE BORROWINGS

The outstanding balances of fixed rate borrowings were as follows:

	Payments Due By Period
Dollars in thousands	2005		2006		2007		2008		2009		Thereafter		June 30, 2005		December 31, 2004		Interest Rate (1)
Certificates of deposit	$	79,388	$	59,485	$	39,188	$	16,858	$	5,293	$	—	$	200,212	$	186,538	2.95	%
SBA debentures		—		—		—		—		—		71,935		71,935		64,435	6.01
Total	$	79,388	$	59,485	$	39,188	$	16,858	$	5,293	$	71,935	$	272,147	$	250,973	3.77

(1) Weighted average contractual rate as of June 30, 2005.

In January 2004, MB commenced raising deposits to fund the purchase of various affiliates’ loan portfolios. The deposits were raised through the use of investment brokerage firms who package deposits qualifying for FDIC insurance into pools that are sold to MB. The rates paid on the deposits are highly competitive with market rates paid by other financial

15

institutions and include a brokerage fee of 0.25% to 0.55%, depending on the maturity of the deposit, which is capitalized and amortized to interest expense over the life of the respective pool. The total amount capitalized was $613,000 and $624,000 at June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004, and $143,000 and $97,000 was amortized to interest expense during the 2005 and 2004 second quarters, and $278,000 and $141,000 was amortized during the 2005 and 2004 six months. Interest on the deposits is accrued daily and paid monthly, semiannually, or at maturity.

During 2001, FSVC and MCI were approved by the SBA to receive $36,000,000 each in funding over a period of five years. In November 2003, FSVC applied for and received an additional commitment of $8,000,000. As of June 30, 2005, $8,065,000 was available to be drawn down under the SBA commitments.

(6) SEGMENT REPORTING

The Company has one business segment, its lending and investing operations. This segment originates and services medallion, secured commercial, and consumer loans, and invests in both marketable and nonmarketable securities.

(7) OTHER INCOME AND OTHER OPERATING EXPENSES

The major components of other income were as follows:

	Three months ended June 30,				Six months ended June 30,
	2005		2004		2005		2004
Late charges and prepayment penalties	$	686,812	$	260,683	$	856,255	$	497,468
Servicing fees and discount accretion		274,110		367,358		619,821		630,766
Audit/ due diligence		48,014		39,762		70,262		40,891
Other		133,545		3,568		269,381		52,510
Total other income	$	1,142,481	$	671,371	$	1,815,719	$	1,221,635

Included in late charges and prepayment penalties in the 2005 second quarter was $525,000 related to a prepayment fee from a large loan refinancing; otherwise, the decreases reflected fewer refinancings and improved payment patterns. Servicing fees and discount accretion decreased as a result of a decline in loans outstanding in BLL. The increase in other income was primarily due to fee income received by MB reflecting the increased lending activity there.

The major components of other operating expenses were as follows:

	Three months ended June 30,				Six months ended June 30,
	2005		2004		2005		2004
Rent expense	$	340,876	$	311,194	$	692,835	$	646,614
Consumer loan servicing		203,764		227,089		406,110		227,089
Travel meals and entertainment		155,296		122,364		386,090		256,945
Depreciation and amortization		212,179		203,253		339,445		330,441
Insurance		93,269		146,271		223,918		293,613
Directors fees		95,879		147,957		201,305		218,995
Loan collection expense		185,331		315,622		331,187		414,671
Office expense		83,211		61,949		180,469		121,874
Telephone		67,793		53,964		135,655		105,356
Advertising, marketing, and public relations		56,828		28,814		133,310		54,120
Temporary help		78,753		17,359		130,341		54,327
Computer expense		63,283		51,875		110,329		110,287
Miscellaneous taxes		66,638		73,341		99,499		208,555
Printing and stationery		61,151		38,711		92,539		70,682
Dues and subscriptions		31,515		22,353		57,766		54,045
Other expenses		360,889		353,837		559,168		519,946
Total other operating expenses	$	2,156,655	$	2,175,953	$	4,079,966	$	3,687,560

Consumer loan servicing increased in the 2005 six months, reflecting the May 2004 consumer loan portfolio purchase. Travel and entertainment increased as a result of more extensive business development activities. Insurance expense decreased as a result of lower premiums charged in more competitive insurance market. Loan collections expense decreased in 2005 as the number of loans over 90 days past due has declined due to better collection efforts. Advertising,

16

marketing and public relations expense was up in 2005 primarily reflecting the consumer portfolio marketing efforts of MB. Temporary help expense grew from increased use of temporary employees for special projects. Included in miscellaneous taxes for the 2004 six months were $71,000 related to sales tax audit results covering years dating back to 1995.

(8) SELECTED FINANCIAL RATIOS AND OTHER DATA

The following table provides selected financial ratios and other data:

	Three months ended June 30,						Six months ended June 30,
	2005			2004			2005			2004
Net share data:
Net asset value at the beginning of the period	$	9.86		$	8.74		$	9.83		$	8.89
Net investment income		0.26			0.14			0.45			0.14
Income tax provision		(0.04	)		(0.06	)		(0.07	)		(0.06	)
Net realized gains (losses) on investments		(0.04	)		(0.02	)		0.08			(0.03	)
Net change in unrealized depreciation on investments		(0.15	)		(0.05	)		(0.30	)		(0.11	)
Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations		0.03			0.01			0.16			(0.06	)
Distributions of net investment income		(0.12	)		(0.08	)		(0.23	)		(0.15	)
Issuance of common stock		(0.03	)		—			(0.02	)
Repurchase of common stock		0.00			0.00			0.01			0.00
Other		0.01			0.01			0.00			0.00
Net asset value at the end of the period	$	9.75		$	8.68		$	9.75		$	8.68
Per share market value at beginning of period	$	9.13		$	8.65		$	9.70		$	9.49
Per share market value at end of period		9.45			7.95			9.45			7.95
Total return (1)		19	%		(29	)%		(3	)%		(29	)%
Ratios/supplemental data
Average net assets	$	166,120,000		$	157,918,000		$	167,553,008		$	159,474,000
Operating expenses ratio (2)		12.91	%		12.81	%		12.86	%		11.85	%
Net investment income after tax ratio (2)		9.06	%		3.85	%		7.84	%		1.83	%

(1) Total return is calculated by comparing the change in value of a share of common stock assuming the reinvestment of dividends on the payment date.

(2) Calculated by dividing annualized described income statement line by average net assets.

(9) MB REGULATORY GUIDELINES

MB is subject to various regulatory capital requirements administered by the FDIC and State of Utah Department of Financial Institutions. Failure to meet minimum capital requirements can initiate certain mandatory and possibly additional discretionary actions by regulators that, if undertaken, could have a direct material effect on MB’s and our financial statements. Under capital adequacy guidelines and the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action, MB must meet specific capital guidelines that involve quantitative measures of MB’s assets, liabilities, and certain off-balance sheet items as calculated under regulatory accounting practices. MB’s capital amounts and classification are also subject to qualitative judgments by the bank regulators about components, risk weightings, and other factors.

Quantitative measures established by regulation to ensure capital adequacy require MB to maintain minimum amounts and ratios as defined in the regulations (set forth in the table below). Additionally, as conditions of granting MB’s application for federal deposit insurance, the FDIC ordered that beginning paid-in-capital funds of not less than $22,000,000 be provided, and that the Tier I Leverage Capital to total assets ratio, as defined, of not less than 15% and an adequate allowance for loan losses shall be maintained and no dividends shall be paid to the Company for its first three years of operation.

The following table represents MB’s actual capital amounts and related ratios as of June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004, compared to required regulatory minimum capital ratios and the ratio required to be considered well capitalized.

17

Management believes, as of June 30, 2005, that MB meets all capital adequacy requirements to which it is subject, and is well-capitalized.

	Regulatory
	Minimum		Well-capitalized		June 30, 2005			December 31, 2004
Tier I capital					$	36,048,000		$	33,492,000
Total capital						38,752,000			35,971,000
Average assets						228,559,000			210,906,000
Risk-weighted assets						214,401,000			195,964,000
Leverage ratio (1)	4	%	5	%		15.8	%		15.9	%
Tier I capital ratio (2)	4		6			16.8			17.1
Total capital ratio (2)	8		10			18.1			18.4

(1) Calculated by dividing Tier I capital by average assets.

(2) Calculated by dividing Tier I or total capital by risk-weighted assets.

(10) SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

On July 28, 2005, the Company’s revolving note agreement with Sterling National Bank was amended, and the maturity date was extended until June 30, 2006.

On July 27, 2005, the Company’s board of directors declared a $0.13 per share common stock dividend, payable on August 31, 2005 to shareholders of record on August 19, 2005.

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

GENERAL

The Company is a specialty finance company that has a leading position in originating and servicing loans that finance taxicab medallions and various types of commercial businesses. Since 1996, the year in which the Company became a public company, it has increased its medallion loan portfolio at a compound annual growth rate of 14%, and its commercial loan portfolio at a compound annual growth rate of 17%. Total assets under our management, which includes assets serviced for third party investors, were approximately $869,226,000 at June 30, 2005, and have grown at a compound annual growth rate of 18% from $215,000,000 at the end of 1996.

The Company’s loan-related earnings depend primarily on its level of net interest income. Net interest income is the difference between the total yield on the Company’s loan portfolio and the average cost of borrowed funds. The Company funds its operations through a wide variety of interest-bearing sources, such as revolving bank facilities, bank certificates of deposit issued to customers, debentures issued to and guaranteed by the SBA, and bank term debt. Net interest income fluctuates with changes in the yield on the Company’s loan portfolio and changes in the cost of borrowed funds, as well as changes in the amount of interest-bearing assets and interest-bearing liabilities held by the Company. Net interest income is also affected by economic, regulatory, and competitive factors that influence interest rates, loan demand, and the availability of funding to finance the Company’s lending activities. The Company, like other financial institutions, is subject to interest rate risk to the degree that its interest-earning assets reprice on a different basis than its interest-bearing liabilities.

The Company also invests in small businesses in selected industries through its subsidiary MCI. MCI’s investments are typically in the form of secured debt instruments with fixed interest rates accompanied by warrants to purchase an equity interest for a nominal exercise price (such warrants are included in equity investments on the consolidated balance sheets). Interest income is earned on the debt investments.

Realized gains or losses on investments are recognized when the investments are sold or written off. The realized gains or losses represent the difference between the proceeds received from the disposition of portfolio assets, if any, and the cost of such portfolio assets. In addition, changes in unrealized appreciation or depreciation of investments are recorded and represent the net change in the estimated fair values of the portfolio assets at the end of the period as compared with their estimated fair values at the beginning of the period. Generally, realized gains (losses) on investments and changes in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments are inversely related. When an appreciated asset is sold to realize a gain, a decrease in the previously recorded unrealized appreciation occurs. Conversely, when a loss previously recorded as unrealized depreciation is realized by the sale or other disposition of a depreciated portfolio asset, the reclassification of the loss from unrealized to realized causes a decrease in net unrealized depreciation and an increase in realized loss.

18

The Company’s investment in MTM, as wholly owned portfolio investments, was also subject to quarterly assessments of fair value. The Company used MTM’s actual results of operations as the best estimate of changes in fair value, and recorded the results as a component of unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments.

19

Trends in Investment Portfolio

The Company’s investment income is driven by the principal amount of and yields on its investment portfolio. To identify trends in the yields, the portfolio is grouped by medallion loans, commercial loans, consumer loans, equity investments, and investment securities. The following table illustrates the Company’s investments at fair value and the portfolio yields at the dates indicated.

	June 30, 2005					March 31, 2005					December 31, 2004					June 30, 2004
(Dollars in thousands)	Interest Rate (1)		Principal Balance			Interest Rate (1)		Principal Balance			Interest Rate (1)		Principal Balance			Interest Rate (1)		Principal Balance
Medallion loans
New York	6.00	%	$	332,852		5.83	%	$	321,878		5.76	%	$	305,157		5.60	%	$	263,225
Chicago	6.92			51,742		6.59			51,470		6.33			52,883		6.37			34,591
Boston	7.35			22,700		7.25			20,859		7.31			19,857		7.41			16,659
Newark	8.80			6,644		9.04			6,721		9.14			6,841		9.35			7,102
Cambridge	7.16			4,904		7.17			4,593		7.19			4,947		7.28			4,592
Other	7.70			4,930		8.07			3,251		8.18			2,804		9.28			2,601
Total medallion loans	6.26			423,772		6.09			408,772		6.01			392,489		5.91			328,770
Deferred loan acquisition costs				1,120					858					851					939
Unrealized depreciation on loans				(1,093	)				(1,358	)				(1,209	)				(1,093	)
Net medallion loans			$	423,799				$	408,272				$	392,131				$	328,616
Commercial loans
Asset based	8.65	%	$	60,941		8.35	%	$	54,484		7.97	%	$	47,959		6.97	%	$	40,275
Secured mezzanine	13.76			58,784		13.66			54,391		14.28			49,006		13.77			40,911
SBA Section 7(a)	8.58			19,349		8.10			18,876		7.65			19,703		6.79			18,317
Other secured commercial	6.07			23,973		9.82			27,237		8.28			27,247		7.64			30,094
Total commercial loans	10.10			163,047		10.44			154,988		10.13			143,915		9.21			129,597
Deferred loan acquisition costs				540					673					798					794
Discount on SBA Section 7(a) loans sold				(935	)				(986	)				(602	)				(981	)
Unrealized depreciation on loans				(6,887	)				(7,416	)				(7,276	)				(7,004	)
Net commercial loans			$	155,765				$	147,259				$	136,835				$	122,406
Consumer loans
Marine	18.56	%	$	40,459		18.56	%	$	36,669		18.60	%	$	35,933		18.54	%	$	40,150
RV	18.68			36,051		18.68			32,526		18.56			15,896		18.73			16,511
Other	18.80			3,191		18.69			2,947		18.79			17,808		18.57			19,611
Total consumer loans	18.63			79,701		18.62			72,142		18.64			69,637		18.59			76,272
Deferred loan acquisition costs				640					269					106					—
Unrealized depreciation on loans				(3,712	)				(3,499	)				(3,412	)				(3,833	)
Net consumer loans			$	76,629				$	68,912				$	66,331				$	72,439
Equity investments	1.35	%	$	29,589		1.35	%	$	29,527		1.37	%	$	32,960		0.00	%	$	4,670
Unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on equities				(1,215	)				1,446					685					356
Net equity investments			$	28,374				$	30,973				$	33,645				$	5,026
Investment securities	3.65	%	$	17,783		3.74	%	$	18,209		3.92	%	$	14,144		3.67	%	$	5,992
Unrealized depreciation on investment securities				(115	)				(95	)				(49	)				—
Premiums paid on purchased securities				617					651					504					199
Net investment securities			$	18,285				$	18,765				$	14,599				$	6,191
Investments at cost (2)	8.25	%	$	713,892		8.13	%	$	683,638		7.99	%	$	653,146		8.46	%	$	545,302
Deferred loan acquisition costs				2,300					1,800					1,755					1,733
Unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on equities				(1,215	)				1,446					685					356
Discount on SBA Section 7(a) loans sold				(935	)				(986	)				(602	)				(981	)
Unrealized depreciation on investment securities				(115	)				(95	)				(49	)				—
Premiums paid on purchased securities				617					651					504					199
Unrealized depreciation on loans				(11,692	)				(12,273	)				(11,898	)				(11,930	)
Net investments			$	702,852				$	674,181				$	643,541				$	534,679

(1) Represents the weighted average interest rate of the respective portfolio as of the date indicated.

(2) The weighted average interest rate for the entire loan portfolio (medallion, commercial, and consumer loans) was 8.68%, 8.57%, 8.44%, and 8.52% at June 30, 2005, March 31, 2005, December 31, 2004, and June 30, 2004.

20

INVESTMENT ACTIVITY

The following table sets forth the components of investment activity in the investment portfolio for the periods indicated.

	Three months ended June 30,						Six months ended June 30,
	2005			2004			2005			2004
Net investments at beginning of period	$	674,180,923		$	419,942,983		$	643,541,008		$	379,158,525
Investments originated		119,476,264			87,718,269			197,119,959			145,667,454
Purchase of RV/Marine loan portfolio		—			80,631,534			—			80,631,534
Repayments of investments		(86,353,527	)		(53,275,147	)		(130,124,352	)		(71,831,448	)
Transfers (to) from other assets		(1,774,352	)		81,896			(4,396,009	)		1,721,600
Net increase in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) (1) (2)		(2,297,781	)		240,482			(4,635,016	)		299,319
Net realized gains (losses) on investments (3)		(617,753	)		(320,328	)		1,482,368			(549,459	)
Realized gains on sales of loans		375,430			185,163			614,950			398,441
Amortization of origination costs		(137,515	)		(526,532	)		(751,219	)		(817,646	)
Net increase in investments		28,670,848			114,735,337			159,310,763			155,519,795
Net investments at end of period	$	702,851,690		$	534,678,320		$	702,851,690		$	534,678,320

(1) Net of unrealized depreciation related to MTM of $1,135,930 and $2,313,359 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2004.

(2) Excludes unrealized depreciation of $325,477, $50,606, $560,477, and $157,934 for the 2005 and 2004 three and six months periods, respectively, related to foreclosed properties, which are carried in other assets on the consolidated balance sheet.

(3) Excludes realized gains (losses) of ($65,063), $5,000, ($117,295), and $34,897 for the 2005 and 2004 three and six months periods, respectively, related to foreclosed properties which are carried in other assets on the consolidated balance sheet.

PORTFOLIO SUMMARY

Total Portfolio Yield

The weighted average yield of the total portfolio at June 30, 2005 was 8.25% (8.68% for the loan portfolio), an increase of 26 basis points from 7.99% at December 31, 2004, and a decrease of 21 basis points from 8.46% at June 30, 2004. The increase from year end primarily reflected the impact of the consumer portfolio purchase and strong growth in the commercial loan portfolio, both at higher yields, as well as the market increase in interest rates. The Company expects to try to increase the percentage of commercial and consumer loans in the total portfolio, the origination of floating and adjustable-rate loans, and the level of non-New York medallion loans to enhance our yields.

Medallion Loan Portfolio

The Company’s medallion loans comprised 60% of the net portfolios of $702,852,000 at June 30, 2005 and 61% of $643,541,000 at December 31, 2004 and 61% of $534,679,000 at June 30, 2004. The medallion loan portfolio increased by $31,668,000 or 8% in 2005, primarily reflecting increases in New York. The increase in the New York market can be attributed to new business marketing efforts, the conversion of participations into owned loans, and the general increase in medallion values and related refinancings. Total medallion loans serviced for third parties were $10,843,000, $16,658,000, and $22,194,000 at June 30, 2005, December 31, 2004, and June 30, 2004.

The weighted average yield of the medallion loan portfolio at June 30, 2005 was 6.26%, an increase of 25 basis points from 6.01% at December 31, 2004,and an increase of 35 basis point from 5.91% at June 30, 2004. The increase in yield from year end primarily reflected the impact of rising interest rates in the economy and the effects of borrower refinancings. At June 30, 2005, 21% of the medallion loan portfolio represented loans outside New York, compared to 22% and 20% at December 31, 2004 and June 30, 2004. The Company continues to focus its efforts on originating higher yielding medallion loans outside the New York market.

Commercial Loan Portfolio

The Company’s commercial loans represented 22% of the net investment portfolio as of June 30, 2005, compared to 21% and 23% at December 31, and June 30, 2004. Commercial loans increased by $18,930,000 or 14% during 2005, primarily reflecting increased loan originations in the asset-based and mezzanine loan portfolios. Total commercial loans serviced for third parties were $97,382,000, $106,508,000, and $117,990,000 at June 30, 2005, and December 31, and June 30, 2004, and included $88,984,000, $98,773,000, and $109,280,000, respectively, related to the SBA Section 7(a) business.

21

The weighted average yield of the commercial loan portfolio at June 30, 2005 was 10.10%, a decrease of 3 basis points from 10.13% at December 31, 2004 and an increase of 89 basis points from 9.21% at June 30, 2004. The decrease was primarily due to higher rate loans paying off and being replaced with lower rate loans and the increase from a year ago reflected the increases in market interest rates. The Company continues to originate adjustable-rate and floating-rate loans tied to the prime rate to help mitigate its interest rate risk in a rising interest rate environment. Variable-rate loans represented approximately 57%, 57%, and 58% of the commercial portfolio at June 30, 2005, December 31, 2004, and June 30, 2004. Although this strategy initially produces a lower yield, we believe that this strategy mitigates interest rate risk by better matching our earning assets to their adjustable-rate funding sources.

Consumer Loan Portfolios

The Company’s consumer loans represented 11% of the net investment portfolio at June 30, 2005, compared to 11% and 14% of the net investment portfolio at December 31, and June 30, 2004. Most of the existing portfolio was purchased on April 1, 2004 from an unrelated financial institution, and the transaction closed May 6, 2004. The Company started originating new adjustable rate consumer loans during the 2004 third quarter. The loans are collateralized by recreational vehicles, boats, and horse trailers located in all 50 states. The portfolio is serviced by a third party subsidiary of a major commercial bank.

The weighted average gross yield of the consumer loan portfolio at June 30, 2005 was 18.63%, compared to 18.64% at December 31, 2004 and 18.59% at June 30, 2004 The amortization of the portfolio purchase premium reduced the above yields by an average of 2.25%, 2.35%, and 1.96 %, respectively. At June 30, 2005, December 31, 2004, and June 30, 2004, adjustable rate loans represented approximately 88%, 85%, and 84%, respectively, of the consumer portfolio.

Delinquency and Loan Loss Experience

We generally follow a practice of discontinuing the accrual of interest income on our loans that are in arrears as to interest payments for a period of 90 days or more. We deliver a default notice and begin foreclosure and liquidation proceedings when management determines that pursuit of these remedies is the most appropriate course of action under the circumstances. A loan is considered to be delinquent if the borrower fails to make a payment on time; however, during the course of discussion on delinquent status, we may agree to modify the payment terms of the loan with a borrower that cannot make payments in accordance with the original loan agreement. For loan modifications, the loan will only be returned to accrual status if all past due interest payments are brought fully current. For credit that is collateral based, we evaluate the anticipated net residual value we would receive upon foreclosure of such loans, if necessary. There can be no assurance, however, that the collateral securing these loans will be adequate in the event of foreclosure. For credit that is cash flow-based, we assess our collateral position, and evaluate most of these relationships on an “enterprise value” basis, expecting to locate and install a new operator to run the business and reduce the debt.

For the consumer loan portfolio, the process to repossess the collateral is started at 60 days past due. If the collateral is not located and the account reaches 120 days delinquent, the account is charged off to realized losses. If the collateral is repossessed, a realized loss is recorded to write the loan down to 75% of its net realizable value, and the collateral is sent to auction. When the collateral is sold, the net auction proceeds are applied to the account, and any remaining balance is written off as a realized loss, and any excess proceeds are recorded as a realized gain. Proceeds collected on charged off accounts are recorded as a realized gain. All collection, repossession, and recovery efforts are handled on behalf of MB by the servicer.

22

The following table shows the trend in loans 90 days or more past due:

	June 30, 2005 (1)				March 31, 2005 (1)				December 31, 2004 (1)				June 30, 2004 (1)
Medallion loans	$	4,718,000	0.7	%	$	5,567,000	0.8	%	$	7,547,000	1.2	%	$	8,791,000	1.6	%
Commercial loans
Secured mezzanine		6,301,000	0.9			7,968,000	1.3			8,171,000	1.4			10,860,000	2.1
SBA Section 7(a)		1,889,000	0.3			1,997,000	0.3			1,884,000	0.3			2,504,000	0.5
Asset-based receivable		—	0.0			—	0.0			—	0.0			—	0.0
Other secured commercial		3,145,000	0.5			2,686,000	0.4			1,251,000	0.2			3,191,000	0.6
Total commercial loans		11,335,000	1.7			12,651,000	2.0			11,306,000	1.9			16,555,000	3.2
Total consumer loans		332,000	0.1			386,000	0.1			541,000	0.1			226,000	0.0
Total loans 90 days or more past due	$	16,385,000	2.5	%	$	18,604,000	2.9	%	$	19,394,000	3.2	%	$	25,572,000	4.8	%

(1) Percentage is calculated against the total loan portfolio.

In general, collection efforts since the establishment of our collection department have substantially contributed to the sizable reduction in overall delinquencies. The decreases in medallion delinquencies primarily reflected the foreclosure of $2,869,000 of Chicago medallions, and improvements in other borrower payment patterns. Secured mezzanine financing delinquencies have decreased over the last several quarters, primarily reflecting payment activity and to a lesser extent chargeoffs. The relatively low level of delinquencies in the SBA Section 7(a) loans, primarily reflected management’s efforts to collect and restructure nonperforming loans, and the foreclosure of certain loans, transferring them to other assets. Included in the SBA Section 7(a) delinquency figures are $416,000, $288,000, and $289,000 at June 30, 2005, December 31, 2004, and June 30, 2004, which represented loans repurchased for the purpose of collecting on the SBA guarantee. The increase in other secured commercial loans primarily related to several customers being monitored by the collections group, and from an overall standpoint was down slightly from a year ago. The Company is actively working with each delinquent borrower to bring them current, and believes that any potential loss exposure is reflected in the Company’s mark-to-market estimates on each loan. Although there can be no assurances as to changes in the trend rate, management believes that any loss exposures are properly reflected in reported asset values.

We monitor delinquent loans for possible exposure to loss by analyzing various factors, including the value of the collateral securing the loan and the borrower’s prior payment history. Under the 1940 Act, our loan portfolio must be recorded at fair value or “marked-to-market.” Unlike other lending institutions, we are not permitted to establish reserves for loan losses. Instead, the valuation of our portfolio is adjusted quarterly to reflect our estimate of the current realizable value of our loan portfolio. Since no ready market exists for this portfolio, fair value is subject to the good faith determination of management and the approval of our Board of Directors. Because of the subjectivity of these estimates, there can be no assurance that in the event of a foreclosure or the sale of portfolio loans we would be able to recover the amounts reflected on our balance sheet.

In determining the value of our portfolio, management and the Board of Directors may take into consideration various factors such as the financial condition of the borrower and the adequacy of the collateral. For example, in a period of sustained increases in market interest rates, management and the Board of Directors could decrease its valuation of the portfolio if the portfolio consists primarily of long-term, fixed-rate loans. Our valuation procedures are designed to generate values that approximate that which would have been established by market forces, and are therefore subject to uncertainties and variations from reported results. Based upon these factors, net unrealized appreciation or depreciation on investments is determined, or the amount by which our estimate of the current realizable value of our portfolio is above or below our cost basis.

23

The following table sets forth the changes in the Company’s unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on net investments during the six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004.

	Loans			Equity Investments			Total
Balance December 31, 2003(1)	$	(7,917,791	)	$	287,045		$	(7,630,746	)
Increase in unrealized
Depreciation on investments		(205,957	)		17,397			(188,560	)
Reversal of unrealized depreciation related to realized
Losses on investments		239,810			7,589			247,399
Balance March 31, 2004 (1)		(7,883,938	)		312,031			(7,571,907	)
Increase in unrealized
Appreciation on investments		—			81,400			81,400
Depreciation on investments (3)		(497,406	)		(38,421	)		(535,827	)
Reversal of unrealized appreciation (depreciation) related to realized
Losses on investments		694,909			—			694,909
RV/Marine Reserve (2)		(4,243,854	)		—			(4,243,854	)
Balance June 30, 2004 (1)	$	(11,930,289	)	$	355,010		$	(11,575,279	)
	Loans			Equity Investments			Total
Balance December 31, 2004 (1)	$	(11,897,572	)	$	636,139		$	(11,261,433	)
Increase in unrealized
Appreciation on investments (3)		—			714,744			714,744
Depreciation on investments		(1,263,442	)		—			(1,263,442	)
Reversal of unrealized (appreciation) depreciation related to realized
Losses on investments		887,795			—			887,795
Balance March 31, 2005 (1)		(12,273,219	)		1,350,883			(10,922,336	)
Increase in unrealized
Depreciation on investments (3)		94,061			(2,680,744	)		(2,586,683	)
Reversal of unrealized appreciation (depreciation) related to realized
Losses on investments		485,617			—			485,617
Other		1,450			—			1,450
Balance June 30, 2005 (1)	$	(11,692,091	)	$	(1,329,861	)	$	(13,021,952	)

(1) Excludes unrealized depreciation of $1,007,695, $747,281, $512,281, $50,606, $0, and $317,361 on foreclosed properties at June 30, 2005, March 31, 2005, December 31, 2004, June 30, 2004, March 31,2004, and December 31, 2003, respectively.

(2) Reflects the difference between the purchase price of the portfolio and the actual nominal value of the loan contracts acquired.

(3) Includes $20,184 and $45,847 of depreciation on investment securities in the 2005 second and first quarters, respectively, and $11,069 of appreciation in the 2004 second quarter.

24

The following table presents credit-related information for the investment portfolios for the quarters ended.

	June 30, 2005			March 31, 2005			December 31, 2004			June 30, 2004
Total loans
Medallion loans	$	423,798,555		$	408,271,424		$	392,131,108		$	328,616,456
Commercial loans		155,765,264			147,258,623			136,834,891			122,405,715
Consumer loans		76,628,773			68,912,433			66,330,748			72,438,909
Total loans		656,192,592			624,442,480			595,296,747			523,461,080
Equity investments (1)		28,373,891			30,973,295			33,645,424			5,026,303
Investment securities		18,285,207			18,765,147			14,598,837			6,190,938
Net investments	$	702,851,690		$	674,180,922		$	643,541,008		$	534,678,321
Unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments
Medallion loans	$	(1,093,449	)	$	(1,358,042	)	$	(1,209,187	)	$	(1,093,310	)
Commercial loans		(6,886,882	)		(7,416,067	)		(7,275,972	)		(7,003,609	)
Consumer loans		(3,711,760	)		(3,499,110	)		(3,412,413	)		(3,833,370	)
Total loans		(11,692,091	)		(12,273,219	)		(11,897,572	)		(11,930,289	)
Equity investments		(1,214,610	)		1,445,950			685,359			354,079
Investment securities		(115,251	)		(95,067	)		(49,220	)		931
Total unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments	$	(13,021,952	)	$	(10,922,336	)	$	(11,261,433	)	$	(11,575,279	)
Unrealized appreciation (depreciation) as a % of balances outstanding (2)
Medallion loans		(0.26	)%		(0.35	)%		(0.31	)%		(0.33	)%
Commercial loans		(4.23	)		(4.74	)		(5.06	)		(5.41	)
Consumer loans		(4.62	)		(4.83	)		(4.90	)		(5.03	)
Total loans		(1.75	)		(1.93	)		(1.96	)		(2.23	)
Equity investments		(4.11	)		4.90			2.08			7.58
Investment securities		(0.63	)		(0.50	)		(0.35	)		0.02
Net investments		(1.82	)		(1.59	)		(1.72	)		(2.12	)
	Three months ended June 30,						Six months ended June 30,
	2005			2004			2005			2004
Realized gains (losses) on loans and equity investments
Medallion loans	$	(258,163	)	$	900		$	(340,337	)	$	2,297
Commercial loans (3)		(87,933	)		(75,124	)		(69,046	)		(298,852	)
Consumer loans		(326,719	)		(562,018	)		(991,758	)		(562,018	)
Total loans		(672,815	)		(636,242	)		(1,401,141	)		(858,574	)
Equity investments		—			320,914			2,766,213			344,011
Investment securities		(10,000	)		—			—			—
Total realized gains (losses) on loans and equity investments	$	(682,815	)	$	(315,328	)	$	1,365,072		$	(514,562	)
Realized gains (losses) as a % of average balances outstanding
Medallion loans		(0.25	)%		0.00	%		(0.17	)%		0.00	%
Commercial loans		(0.23	)		(0.26	)		(0.09	)		(0.57	)
Consumer loans		(1.80	)		(6.11	)		(2.74	)		(5.33	)
Total loans		(0.42	)		(0.54	)		(0.44	)		(0.39	)
Equity investments		—			26.02			18.02			13.88
Investment securities		(0.13	)		—			—			—
Net investments		(0.40	)		(0.26	)		0.40			(0.23	)

(1) Represents common stock and warrants held as investments.

(2) Unlike other lending institutions, we are not permitted to establish reserves for loan losses. Instead, the valuation of our portfolio is adjusted quarterly to reflect estimates of the current realizable value of the loan portfolio. These percentages represent the discount or premiums that investments are carried on the books at, relative to their par value.

(3) Includes realized gains (losses) of ($65,063), $5,000), ($117,295), and $34,897 for the 2005 and 2004 three and six month periods, related to foreclosed properties which are carried in other assets on the consolidated balance sheet.

Equity Investments

Equity investments were 4%, 5%, and 0%, of the Company’s total portfolio at June 30, 2005, December 31, 2004, and June 30, 2004. Equity investments are comprised of common stock and warrants. The increase in equity investments during 2004 primarily reflected the receipt of 933,521 shares of common stock of CCU in a tax-free exchange for 100% of our ownership interest in Media.

25

Investment Securities

Investment securities were 3%, 2%, and 1% of the Company’s total portfolio at June 30, 2005, December 31, 2004, and June 30, 2004, respectively, and represent a new investment category as of the 2004 first quarter. The investment securities are primarily adjustable-rate mortgage-backed securities purchased by MB to better utilize required cash liquidity.

Trend in Interest Expense

The Company’s interest expense is driven by the interest rates payable on its short-term credit facilities with banks, bank certificates of deposit, fixed-rate, long-term debentures issued to the SBA, and other short-term notes payable. The establishment of the Merrill Lynch Bank, USA (MLB) line of credit in September 2002 and its favorable renegotiation in September 2003 and January 2005 had the effect of substantially reducing the Company’s cost of funds. In addition, MB began raising brokered bank certificates of deposit during 2004, which were at the Company’s lowest borrowing costs. As a result of MB raising funds through certificates of deposits as previously noted, the Company was able to realign the ownership of some of its medallions and related assets to MB allowing the Company and its subsidiaries to use cash generated through these transactions to retire debt with higher interest rates.

During the 2002 third quarter, the Trust closed a $250,000,000 line of credit with MLB for lending on medallion loans (which is now at $325,000,000), which was priced at LIBOR plus 1.50%, excluding fees and other costs. During the 2003 third quarter, this line was renewed and extended, and borrowings were generally at LIBOR plus 1.25%. During the 2005 first quarter, this line was further renewed and extended, and borrowings were now generally at LIBOR plus 0.75%.

The Company’s cost of funds is primarily driven by the rates paid on its various debt instruments and their relative mix, and changes in the levels of average borrowings outstanding. See Notes 4 and 5 to the consolidated financial statements for details on the terms of all outstanding debt. The Company’s debentures issued to the SBA typically have terms of ten years.

The Company measures its borrowing costs as its aggregate interest expense for all of its interest-bearing liabilities divided by the average amount of such liabilities outstanding during the period. The following table shows the average borrowings and related borrowing costs for the three and six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004. Average balances have increased from a year ago, primarily reflecting the establishment of MB and its resulting growth, and the funding needs to support the growth in the Company’s other investment portfolios. The increase in borrowing costs reflected the trend of increasing interest rates in the economy and additional long-term SBA debt at higher rates, partially offset by the raising of low-cost deposits by MB.

	Three months ended						Six months ended
	Interest Expense		Average Balance		Average Borrowing Costs		Interest Expense		Average Balance		Average Borrowing Costs
June 30, 2005
Floating rate borrowings	$	3,263,000	$	305,459,000	4.28	%	$	6,167,000	$	294,581,000	4.22	%
Fixed rate borrowings		2,608,000		262,075,000	3.99			4,925,000		256,069,000	3.88
Total	$	5,871,000	$	567,534,000	4.15		$	11,092,000	$	550,650,000	4.06
June 30, 2004
Floating rate borrowings	$	1,955,000	$	204,467,000	3.85	%	$	3,665,000	$	198,376,000	3.74	%
Fixed rate borrowings		1,701,000		187,174,000	3.66			2,889,000		150,252,000	3.85
Total	$	3,656,000	$	391,641,000	3.75		$	6,554,000	$	348,628,000	3.76

The Company will continue to seek SBA funding to the extent it offers attractive rates. SBA financing subjects its recipients to limits on the amount of secured bank debt they may incur. The Company uses SBA funding to fund loans that qualify under SBIA and SBA regulations. The Company believes that financing operations primarily with short-term floating rate secured bank debt has generally decreased its interest expense, but has also increased the Company’s exposure to the risk of increases in market interest rates, which the Company mitigates with certain strategies. At June 30, 2005, December 31, 2004, and June 30, 2004, short-term floating rate debt constituted 53%, 52%, and 49% of total debt, respectively. The decrease in 2004 reflects the issuance of bank certificates of deposit by MB, that are primarily of a short-term nature.

26

Taxicab Advertising

In addition to the Company’s finance business, MTM also conducted a taxicab rooftop advertising business primarily through Media, which began operations in November 1994, and ceased operations upon the merger of Media with and into a subsidiary of CCU, and the sale of MMJ to its management. See Note 3 to the financial statements for additional information. Although Media was a wholly-owned portfolio investment of the Company, its results of operations were not consolidated with the Company’s operations because SEC regulations prohibit the consolidation of non-investment companies with investment companies.

Factors Affecting Net Assets

Factors that affect the Company’s net assets include net realized gain or loss on investments and change in net unrealized appreciation or depreciation on investments. Net realized gain or loss on investments is the difference between the proceeds derived upon sale or foreclosure of a loan or an equity investment and the cost basis of such loan or equity investment. Change in net unrealized appreciation or depreciation on investments is the amount, if any, by which the Company’s estimate of the fair value of its investment portfolio is above or below the previously established fair value or the cost basis of the portfolio. Under the 1940 Act and the SBIA, the Company’s loan portfolio and other investments must be recorded at fair value.

Unlike certain lending institutions, the Company is not permitted to establish reserves for loan losses, but adjusts quarterly the valuation of the loan portfolio to reflect the Company’s estimate of the current value of the total loan portfolio. Since no ready market exists for the Company’s loans, fair value is subject to the good faith determination of the Company. In determining such fair value, the Company and its Board of Directors consider factors such as the financial condition of its borrowers and the adequacy of its collateral. Any change in the fair value of portfolio loans or other investments as determined by the Company is reflected in net unrealized depreciation or appreciation of investments and affects net increase in net assets resulting from operations but has no impact on net investment income or distributable income.

The Company’s investment in MTM, as wholly-owned portfolio investments, were also subject to quarterly assessments of its fair value. The Company used MTM’s actual results of operations as the best estimate of changes in fair value, and recorded the result as a component of unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments.

27

SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

Summary Consolidated Financial Data

You should read the consolidated financial information below with the Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes thereto for the quarters ended June 30, 2005 and 2004.

	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six months ended June 30,
Dollars in thousands	2005			2004			2005			2004
Statement of operations
Investment income	$	14,138		$	10,400		$	27,103		$	16,886
Interest expense		5,871			3,656			11,092			6,554
Net interest income		8,267			6,744			16,011			10,332
Noninterest income		1,518			857			2,431			1,620
Operating expenses		5,347			5,028			10,688			9,396
Net investment income before income taxes		4,438			2,573			7,754			2,556
Income tax provision		684			1,063			1,241			1,108
Net investment income after income taxes		3,754			1,510			6,513			1,448
Net realized gains (losses) on investments		(683	)		(315	)		1,365			(514	)
Net change in unrealized depreciation on investments (1)		(2,624	)		(946	)		(5,195	)		(2,065	)
Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations	$	447		$	249		$	2,683		$	(1,131	)
Per share data
Net investment income	$	0.26		$	0.14		$	0.45		$	0.14
Income tax provision		(0.04	)		(0.06	)		(0.07	)		(0.06	)
Net realized losses on investments		(0.04	)		(0.02	)		0.08			(0.03	)
Net change in unrealized appreciation on investments		(0.15	)		(0.05	)		(0.30	)		(0.11	)
Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations	$	0.03		$	0.01		$	0.16		$	(0.06	)
Dividends declared per share	$	0.13		$	0.08		$	0.25		$	0.16
Weighted average common shares outstanding
Basic		16,969,568			18,141,427			17,063,025			18,179,524
Diluted		17,413,963			18,540,419			17,507,421			18,179,524
Balance sheet data
Net investments							$	702,852		$	534,678
Total assets								761,001			608,709
Total borrowed funds								582,056			442,529
Total liabilities								595,030			451,291
Total shareholders’ equity								165,971			157,418

28

	Three Months Ended June 30,				Six months ended June 30,
	2005		2004		2005		2004
Selected financial ratios and other data
Return on average assets (ROA) (2)
Net investment income	2.01	%	1.18	%	1.79	%	0.57	%
Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations	0.24		0.19		0.74		(0.44	)
Return on average equity (ROE) (3)
Net investment income	9.06		3.81		7.84		1.83
Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations	1.08		0.63		3.23		(1.43	)
Weighted average yields	8.16	%	8.54	%	8.03	%	7.50	%
Weighted average cost of funds	3.41		3.03		3.31		2.95
Net interest margin (4)	4.75	%	5.51	%	4.72		4.55	%
Noninterest income ratio (5)	0.88	%	1.26	%	0.73	%	0.73	%
Operating expense ratio (6)	3.11		4.17		3.19		4.25
As a percentage of net investment portfolio
Medallion loans					60	%	61	%
Commercial loans					22		23
Consumer loans					11		14
Equity investments					4		1
Investment securities					3		1
Investments to assets (7)					92	%	88	%
Equity to assets (8)					22		26
Debt to equity (9)					351		281

(1) Net changes in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments represents the increase (decrease) for the period in the fair value of the Company’s investments including foreclosed properties, and also including the results of operations for MTM.

(2) ROA represents the net investment income (loss) or net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations, divided by average total assets.

(3) ROE represents the net investment income (loss) or net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations divided by average shareholders’ equity.

(4) Net interest margin represents net interest income divided by average interest earning assets.

(5) Noninterest income ratio represents noninterest income divided by average interest earning assets.

(6) Operating expense ratio represents operating expenses divided by average interest earning assets.

(7) Represents net investments divided by total assets as of June 30.

(8) Represents total shareholders’ equity divided by total assets as of June 30.

(9) Represents total debt (floating rate and fixed rate borrowings) divided by total shareholders’ equity as of June 30.

Consolidated Results of Operations

2005 Second Quarter and Six Months compared to the 2004 Periods

Net increase in net assets resulting from operations was $447,000 or $0.03 per diluted common share and $2,683,000 or $0.15 per share in the 2005 second quarter and six months, up $198,000 and $3,814,000 from an increase of $249,000 or $0.01 and a decrease of ($1,131,000) or ($0.06) in the 2004 second quarter and six months, primarily reflecting increased net interest income resulting from portfolio growth, operating losses in Media in the year ago periods, higher levels of fee income, and lower income taxes, partially offset by increased realized/unrealized depreciation on investments and higher operating expenses associated with servicing the increased asset levels. The 2005 six month period also reflected the full impact of the consumer business line, which was begun in May 2004. Net investment income after taxes was $3,753,000 or $0.22 per diluted common share and $6,513,000 or $0.37 in the 2005 second quarter and six months, up $2,243,000 and $5,065,000 from $1,510,000 or $0.08 per share and $1,448,000 or $0.08 in the 2004 periods.

Investment income was $14,138,000 and $27,104,000 in the 2005 quarter and six months, up $3,737,000 or 36% and $10,218,000 or 61% from $10,401,000 and $16,886,000 in the year ago periods, and included $3,087,000 and $5,860,000 in income earned on the purchased/originated consumer portfolio, compared to $3,304,000 for both 2004 periods. Investment income in 2005 also benefited from interest recoveries of $543,000 and $1,080,000 in the quarter and six months from previously nonperforming investments. Excluding those items, investment income increased $3,411,000 or 48% and $6,582,000 or 49% compared to the year ago periods, primarily reflecting the growth in the other investment

29

portfolios. The yield on the investment portfolio was 8.16% in the 2005 quarter, down 4% from 8.54% in 2004, and was 8.03% in the 2005 six months, up 7% from 7.50% a year ago, reflecting the impact of the higher yielding consumer portfolio, the general increase in market interest rates, and the interest recoveries. The yield on the investment portfolio excluding the consumer portfolio and the interest recoveries was 6.75% and 6.65% in 2005 quarter and six months, up 8% and 5% from 6.28% and 6.31% in 2004 periods. Average investments outstanding were $689,850,000 and $675,052,000 in the 2005 quarter and six months, up 42% and 51% from $485,128,000 and $447,064,000 in the year ago periods. Excluding the consumer portfolio, average investments outstanding were $617,361,000 and $605,101,000, in the 2005 periods, up 38% and 42% from $448,133,000 and $425,925,000 in the year ago periods, reflecting the growth in the other portfolios.

Medallion loans were $423,799,000 at quarter end, up $95,183,000 or 29% from $328,616,000 a year ago, representing 60% of the investment portfolio compared to 61% in 2004, and were yielding 6.26% compared to 5.91% in 2004, an increase of 6%. The increase in outstandings primarily reflected efforts to book new business and repurchase certain participations, primarily in the New York City and Chicago markets, to maximize the utilization of the lower cost MLB line, and reflects the success of the recent New York medallion auctions and the increase in medallion values. The managed medallion portfolio was $434,642,000 at quarter end, up $83,766,000 or 24% from $350,876,000 a year ago. The commercial loan portfolio was $155,765,000 at quarter end, compared to $122,406,000 a year ago, an increase of $33,359,000 or 27%, and represented 22% of the investment portfolio compared to 23% in 2004. Commercial loans yielded 10.10% at quarter end, compared to 9.21% a year ago, an increase of 10%, reflecting the increases in market interest rates during year, the floating rate nature of much of the portfolio, and the growth in higher yielding portfolios. The increase in commercial loans was concentrated in asset based receivables (including repurchased participations) and high-yield mezzanine loans, partially offset by decreases in loans in the other commercial categories. The managed commercial portfolio was $253,147,000 at quarter end, up $12,816,000 or 5% from $240,331,000 a year ago, primarily reflecting the increases described above, partially offset by the drop in SBA outstandings from payoffs and sales in excess new originations. The new consumer loan portfolio, composed primarily of purchased loans, of $76,629,000 was up $4,190,000 or 6% from $72,439,000 a year ago, and represented 11% of the investment portfolio at quarter end compared to 14% a year ago, and yielded 18.63% compared to 18.59% a year ago. Equity investments were $28,374,000, up $23,348,000 from $5,026,000 a year ago, primarily reflecting the receipt of CCU common stock for our ownership interest in Media, and represented 4% of the investment portfolio and had a dividend yield of 1.35%, compared to 1% and 0% a year ago. Investment securities of $18,285,000 were up $12,094,000 from $6,191,000 a year ago, and represented 3% of the investment portfolio, and yielded 3.65%, compared to 1% and 3.67% a year ago. See page 20 for a table that shows balances and yields by type of investment.

Interest expense was $5,871,000 and $$11,092,000 in the 2005 quarter and six months, up $2,215,000 or 61% and $4,538,000 or 69% from $3,656,000 and $6,554,000 in the 2004 periods. The increase in interest expense was primarily due to higher average borrowed funds outstanding. Average debt outstanding was $570,260,000 and $553,738,000 for the 2005 periods, compared to $385,920,000 and $347,506,000 in the year ago periods, increases of 48% and 59%, primarily reflecting the increase in brokered CD’s, increased utilization of the ML Line, and other borrowings used to fund portfolio investment growth, including the consumer portfolio purchase. The cost of borrowed funds was 4.13%and 4.04% in the 2005 quarter and six months, compared to 3.81% and 3.79% in the year ago periods, increases of 8% and 7%, reflecting increases in the general level of interest rates over the last year. See page 27 for a table which shows average balances and cost of funds for the Company’s funding sources.

Net interest income was $8,267,000 and $16,012,000, and the net interest margins were 4.74% and 4.72%, for the 2005 quarter and six months, up $1,522,000 or 23% and $5,680,000 or 55% from $6,744,000 and $10,332,000 in the 2004 periods, which represented net interest margins of 5.50% and 4.55%, all reflecting the items discussed above.

Noninterest income was $1,518,000 and $2,431,000 in the 2005second quarter and six months, up $661,000 or 77% and $811,000 or 50% from $857,000 and $1,620,000 in the year ago quarter and six months. Gains on the sale of loans were $375,000 and $615,000 in the 2005 periods, up $190,000 or 103% and $217,000 or 54% from $185,000 and $398,000 in 2004. During 2005, $4,740,000 and $7,572,000 of guaranteed loans were sold under the SBA program, compared to $2,144,000 and $4,422,000 in 2004, increases of 121% and 71%. The increase in gains on sale under the SBA program primarily reflected the pickup in loan origination and sales activities as new loan originators began producing, partially offset by lower market-determined net premiums received on the sales in 2005. Other income, which is comprised of servicing fee income, prepayment fees, late charges, and other miscellaneous income, was $1,142,000 and $1,816,000 in 2005, compared to $671,000 and $1,222,000 in the year ago periods, increases of $471,000 or 70% and $594,000 or 49%. Included in the 2005 second quarter was a $525,000 prepayment penalty from a paid-off loan, and an additional $39,000 increase in the servicing asset impairment reserve, which offset a 2005 first quarter reserve reversal. Excluding the above, other income decreased $15,000 or 2% in the quarter and increased $69,000 or 6% in the six months.

30

Operating expenses were $5,347,000 and $10,688,000 in the 2005 second quarter and six months, compared to $5,028,000 and $9,396,000 in the 2004 periods, increases of $319,000 or 6% and $1,292,000 or 14%. Salaries and benefits expense was $2,708,000 and $5,620,000 in the 2005 quarter and six months, up $405,000 or 18% and $916,000 or 19% from $2,303,000 and $4,704,000 in 2004, primarily reflecting an 11% increase in headcount compared to the 2004 periods, mostly related to MB and BLL, and higher levels of salaries, partially offset by higher amounts of salary deferrals related to loan originations. Professional fees were $482,000 and $988,000 in 2005, down $67,000 or 12% and $16,000 or 2% from $549,000 and $1,004,000 a year ago, reflecting the stabilization of professional costs in 2005. Other operating expenses of $2,157,000 and $4,080,000 in the 2005 quarter and six months were down $19,000 or 1% and were up $392,000 or 11% from $2,176,000 and $3,688,000 in the year ago periods. The quarterly improvement reflected reduced loan collections, insurance, and directors expenses, partially offset by increased expenses associated with the growth of MB. The increase in the six months included $342,000 of service costs for the consumer portfolio, and increased travel and entertainment and marketing expenses, partially offset by reduced loan collections, insurance, and banking expenses.

Income tax expense was $684,000 and $1,241,000 in the 2005 second quarter and six months, compared to $1,063,000 and $1,108,000 in the year ago periods, primarily reflecting MB’s provision for taxes.

Net unrealized depreciation on investments was $2,623,000 and $5,196,000 in the 2005 second quarter and six months, compared to $946,000 and $2,065,000 in the 2004 periods, increases of $1,677,000 and $3,131,000. Included in the 2004 quarter and six months was $1,136,000 and $2,314,000 of unrealized depreciation related to the net losses of the MTM divisions of the Company prior to their sale during the 2004 third quarter. Excluding MTM, 2005 unrealized depreciation increased by $2,813,000 and $5,445,000 from unrealized appreciation of $190,000 and $249,000 in the 2004 periods. Unrealized appreciation (depreciation) arises when the Company makes valuation adjustments to the investment portfolio. When investments are sold or written off, any resulting realized gain (loss) is grossed up to reflect previously recorded unrealized components. As a result, movement between periods can appear distorted. The 2005 activity resulted from the net unrealized depreciation on equity investments of $2,877,000 ($2,162,000 in the six months), net unrealized depreciation on foreclosed property of $325,000 ($560,000 in the six months), and reversals of unrealized appreciation associated with equity investments that were sold of $2,676,000 in the six months only, partially offset by the reversals of unrealized depreciation associated with fully depreciated loans which were charged off of $519,000 ($1,406,000 in the six months) and net unrealized appreciation on loans of $60,000 (depreciation of $1,204,000 in the six months). The 2004 second quarter activity resulted from the reversals of unrealized depreciation associated with fully depreciated loans which were charged off of $695,000 ($943,000 for the six months) and net increases in the valuation of equity investments of $43,000 ($60,000 for the six months), partially offset by net unrealized depreciation on loans of $497,000 ($703,000 in the six months) and net unrealized depreciation of $51,000 on foreclosed property in the three and six months.

The Company’s net realized loss on investments was $683,000 in the 2005 quarter and was a gain of $1,365,000 in the 2005 six months, compared to losses of $315,000 and $515,000 in the 2004 periods, reflecting the above, and by net direct chargeoffs of $99,000 (recoveries of $140,000 in the six months) and net direct losses on sales of foreclosed property of $65,000 ($145,000 in the six months), partially offset by direct gains on sales of equity investments of $100,000 in the six months only. The 2004 activity reflected the above and direct gains on sales of equity investments of $315,000 in the 2004 quarter and six months, direct gains on sales of foreclosed property of $5,000 ($35,000 in the six months), and by net recoveries of $59,000 ($77,000 in the six months).

The Company’s net realized/unrealized losses on investments were $3,306,000 and $3,830,000 in the 2005 second quarter and six months, compared to losses of $1,261,000 and $2,579,000 in the 2004 periods, reflecting the above.

ASSET/LIABILITY MANAGEMENT

Interest Rate Sensitivity

The Company, like other financial institutions, is subject to interest rate risk to the extent its interest-earning assets (consisting of medallion, commercial, and consumer loans; and investment securities) reprice on a different basis over time in comparison to its interest-bearing liabilities (consisting primarily of credit facilities with banks, bank certificates of deposit, and subordinated SBA debentures).

31

Having interest-bearing liabilities that mature or reprice more frequently on average than assets may be beneficial in times of declining interest rates, although such an asset/liability structure may result in declining net earnings during periods of rising interest rates. Abrupt increases in market rates of interest may have an adverse impact on our earnings until we are able to originate new loans at the higher prevailing interest rates. Conversely, having interest-earning assets that mature or reprice more frequently on average than liabilities may be beneficial in times of rising interest rates, although this asset/liability structure may result in declining net earnings during periods of falling interest rates. This mismatch between maturities and interest rate sensitivities of our interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities results in interest rate risk.

The effect of changes in interest rates is mitigated by regular turnover of the portfolio. Based on past experience, the Company anticipates that approximately 40% of the taxicab medallion portfolio will mature or be prepaid each year. The Company believes that the average life of its loan portfolio varies to some extent as a function of changes in interest rates. Borrowers are more likely to exercise prepayment rights in a decreasing interest rate environment because the interest rate payable on the borrower’s loan is high relative to prevailing interest rates. Conversely, borrowers are less likely to prepay in a rising interest rate environment. However, borrowers may prepay for a variety of other reasons, such as to monetize increases in the underlying collateral values, particularly in the medallion loan portfolio.

In addition, the Company manages its exposure to increases in market rates of interest by incurring fixed-rate indebtedness, such as ten year subordinated SBA debentures, and by setting repricing intervals or the maturities of tranches drawn under the revolving line of credit or issued as certificates of deposit, for terms of up to five years. The Company had outstanding SBA debentures of $71,935,000 with a weighted average interest rate of 6.01%, constituting 12% of the Company’s total indebtedness as of June 30, 2005. Also, as of June 30, 2005, portions of the adjustable rate debt with Banks repriced at intervals of as long as 28 months, and certain of the certificates of deposit were for terms of up to 46 months, further mitigating the immediate impact of changes in market interest rates.

A relative measure of interest rate risk can be derived from the Company’s interest rate sensitivity gap. The interest rate sensitivity gap represents the difference between interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities, which mature and/or reprice within specified intervals of time. The gap is considered to be positive when repriceable assets exceed repriceable liabilities, and negative when repriceable liabilities exceed repriceable assets. A relative measure of interest rate sensitivity is provided by the cumulative difference between interest sensitive assets and interest sensitive liabilities for a given time interval expressed as a percentage of total assets.

32

The following table presents the Company’s interest rate sensitivity gap at June 30, 2005, compared to the respective positions at the end of 2004 and 2003. The principal amount of medallion loans and commercial loans are assigned to the time frames in which such principal amounts are contractually obligated to be repriced. The Company has not reflected an assumed annual prepayment rate for medallion loans or commercial loans in this table.

	June 30, 2005 Cumulative Rate Gap(1)
(Dollars in thousands)	Less Than 1 Year			More Than 1 and Less Than 2 Years			More Than 2 and Less Than 3 Years			More Than 3 and Less Than 4 Years		More Than 4 and Less Than 5 Years		More Than 5 and Less Than 6 Years		Thereafter			Total
Earning assets
Floating-rate loans	$	130,255		$	—		$	—		$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—		$	130,255
Adjustable rate loans		56,593			17,680			30,435			10,998		4,320		18,211		10,693			148,930
Fixed-rate loans		37,808			74,540			137,682			88,805		56,290		4,855		18,543			418,523
Cash		15,485			—			—			—		—		—		—			15,485
Total earning assets	$	240,141		$	92,220		$	168,117		$	99,803	$	60,610	$	23,066	$	29,236		$	713,193
Interest bearing liabilities
Revolving line of credit	$	181,057		$	95,000		$	20,000		$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—		$	296,057
Certificates of deposit		115,210			57,355			22,354			5,293		—		—		—			200,212
Notes payable to banks		13,852			—			—			—		—		—		—			13,852
SBA debentures		—			—			—			—		—		—		71,935			71,935
Total liabilities	$	310,119		$	152,355		$	42,354		$	5,293	$	—	$	—	$	71,935		$	582,056
Interest rate gap	$	(69,978	)	$	(60,135	)	$	125,763		$	94,510	$	60,610	$	23,066	$	(42,699	)	$	131,137
Cumulative interest rate gap (2)	$	(69,978	)	$	(130,113	)	$	(4,350	)	$	90,160	$	150,770	$	173,836	$	131,137			—
December 31, 2004 (2)	$	27,175		$	52,388		$	62,710		$	108,181	$	173,610	$	176,752	$	131,520			—
December 31, 2003 (2)		(61,987	)		(6,176	)		104,121			123,280		181,851		189,272		141,674			—

(1) The ratio of the cumulative one year gap to total interest rate sensitive assets was (10%), 4%, and (14%) as of June 30, 2005, December 31, 2004, and December 31, 2003.

(2) Adjusted for the medallion loan 40% prepayment assumption results in cumulative one year positive interest rate gap and related ratio of $53,146,000 or 8%, $136,030,000 or 21%, and $19,136,000 or 4% for June 30, 2005, December 31, 2004, and December 31, 2003, respectively.

The Company’s interest rate sensitive assets were $713,193,000 and interest rate sensitive liabilities were $582,056,000at June 30, 2005. The one-year cumulative interest rate gap was a negative $69,978,000 or 10% of interest rate sensitive assets, compared to a positive gap of $27,175,000 or 4% at December 31, 2004. However, using our estimated 40% prepayment/refinancing rate for medallion loans to adjust the interest rate gap resulted in a positive gap of $53,146,000 or 8% at June 30, 2005. The Company seeks to manage interest rate risk by originating adjustable-rate loans, by incurring fixed-rate indebtedness, by evaluating appropriate derivatives, pursuing securitization opportunities, and by other options consistent with managing interest rate risk.

Interest Rate Cap Agreements

From time-to time, the Company enters into interest rate cap agreements to manage the exposure of the portfolio to increases in market interest rates by hedging a portion of its variable-rate debt against increases in interest rates. There were no interest rate caps outstanding during 2005 and 2004.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Our sources of liquidity are the revolving line of credit with MLB, unfunded commitments from the SBA for long-term debentures that are issued to or guaranteed by the SBA, loan amortization and prepayments, participations or sales of loans to third parties, and our ability to raise brokered certificates of deposit through MB. As a RIC, we are required to distribute at least 90% of our investment company taxable income; consequently, we have primarily relied upon external sources of funds to finance growth. The Trust’s $325,000,000 revolving line of credit with MLB has availability of $40,943,000 as of June 30, 2005. At the current required capital levels, it is expected, although there can be no guarantee, that deposits of approximately $1,500,000 could be raised by MB to fund future loan origination activity. In addition, MB as a non-RIC subsidiary of the Company is allowed (and for three years required) to retain all earnings in the business to fund

33

future growth. The Company has $80,000,000 of additional funding commitments with the SBA ($113,400,000 to be committed by the SBA in total), partially subject to the infusion of additional equity capital into the respective subsidiaries. At June 30, 2004, $8,065,000 is available under these commitments ($4,500,000 of which requires a capital contribution from the Company of $1,500,000). Since SBA financing subjects its recipients to certain regulations, the Company will seek funding at the subsidiary level to maximize its benefits. Lastly, approximately $10,308,000 was available at June 30, 2005 under a loan sale agreement that MBC has with a participant bank, and $8,300,000 was available under a revolving credit agreements with a commercial banks.

The components of our debt were as follows at June 30, 2005: See notes 4 and 5 to the consolidated financial statements on page 14 for details of the contractual terms of the Company’s borrowings.

	Balance		Percentage		Rate(1)
Revolving line of credit	$	284,057,000	49	%	3.76	%
Certificates of deposit		200,212,000	35		2.95
SBA debentures		71,935,000	12		6.01
Notes payable to banks		13,852,000	2		5.98
Margin loan		12,000,000	2		4.01
Total outstanding debt	$	582,056,000	100	%	3.82	%

(1) Weighted average contractual rate as of June 30, 2005.

The Company values its portfolio at fair value as determined in good faith by management and approved by the Board of Directors in accordance with the Company’s valuation policy. Unlike certain lending institutions, the Company is not permitted to establish reserves for loan losses. Instead, the Company must value each individual investment and portfolio loan on a quarterly basis. The Company records unrealized depreciation on investments and loans when it believes that an asset has been impaired and full collection is unlikely. The Company records unrealized appreciation on equities if it has a clear indication that the underlying portfolio company has appreciated in value and, therefore, the Company’s equity investment has also appreciated in value. Without a readily ascertainable market value, the estimated value of the Company’s portfolio of investments and loans may differ significantly from the values that would be placed on the portfolio if there existed a ready market for the investments. The Company adjusts the valuation of the portfolio quarterly to reflect management’s estimate of the current fair value of each investment in the portfolio. Any changes in estimated fair value are recorded in the Company’s statement of operations as net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments. The Company’s investment in MTM, as wholly-owned portfolio investments, was also subject to quarterly assessments of its fair value. The Company used MTM’s actual results of operations as the best estimate of changes in fair value, and recorded the result as a component of unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments.

In addition, the illiquidity of our loan portfolio and investments may adversely affect our ability to dispose of loans at times when it may be advantageous for us to liquidate such portfolio or investments. In addition, if we were required to liquidate some or all of the investments in the portfolio, the proceeds of such liquidation may be significantly less than the current value of such investments. Because we borrow money to make loans and investments, our net operating income is dependent upon the difference between the rate at which we borrow funds and the rate at which we invest these funds. As a result, there can be no assurance that a significant change in market interest rates will not have a material adverse effect on our interest income. In periods of sharply rising interest rates, our cost of funds would increase, which would reduce our net operating income before net realized and unrealized gains. We use a combination of long-term and short-term borrowings and equity capital to finance our investing activities. Our long-term fixed-rate investments are financed primarily with short-term floating-rate debt, and to a lesser extent by term fixed-rate debt we may use interest rate risk management techniques in an effort to limit our exposure to interest rate fluctuations. Such techniques may include various interest rate hedging activities to the extent permitted by the 1940 Act. The Company has analyzed the potential impact of changes in interest rates on interest income net of interest expense. Assuming that the balance sheet were to remain constant and no actions were taken to alter the existing interest rate sensitivity, a hypothetical immediate 1% increase in interest rates would have positively impacted net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations as of at June 30, 2005 by approximately $1,183,000 on an annualized basis, compared to $992,000 as of December 31, 2004, and the impact of such an immediate 1% change over a one year period would have been ($408,000) compared to $517,000 at December 31, 2004. Although management believes that this measure is indicative of the Company’s sensitivity to interest rate changes, it does not adjust for potential changes in credit quality, size and composition of the assets on the balance sheet, and other business developments that could affect net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations in a particular quarter or for the year taken as a whole. Accordingly, no assurances can be given that actual results would not differ materially from the potential outcome simulated by these estimates.

34

The Company continues to work with investment banking firms and other financial intermediaries to investigate the viability of a number of other financing options which include, among others, the sale or spin off certain assets or divisions, the development of a securitization conduit program, and other independent financing for certain subsidiaries or asset classes. These financing options would also provide additional sources of funds for both external expansion and continuation of internal growth.

The following table illustrates sources of available funds for the Company and each of the subsidiaries, and amounts outstanding under credit facilities and their respective end of period weighted average interest rates at June 30, 2005. See notes 4 and 5 to the consolidated financial statements for additional information about each credit facility.

(Dollars in thousands)	The Company			MFC			BLL			MCI			MBC		FSVC			MB			Total			12/31/04			6/30/04
Cash	$	3,060		$	2,350		$	(195	)	$	998		$	2,009	$	7,263		$	13,406		$	28,890		$	37,267		$	40,464
Bank loans (1)		15,000			4,000																	19,000			15,000			15,000
Amounts undisbursed		4,300			4,000																	8,300			3,300			6,300
Amounts outstanding		10,700			3,152																	13,852			15,003			12,140
Average interest rate		6.25	%		5.07	%																5.98	%		4.97	%		4.03	%
Maturity		7/05			12/05-7/08																	7/05-7/08			4/05-6/07			4/05-6/07
Lines of credit (2)				$	325,000																$	325,000		$	250,000		$	250,000
Amounts undisbursed					40,943																	40,943			43			43,745
Amounts outstanding					284,057																	284,057			249,957			206,255
Average interest rate					3.76	%																3.76	%		3.85	%		3.15	%
Maturity					9/06																	9/06			9/05			9/05
Margin loan	$	12,000																			$	12,000		$	10,000
Average interest rate		4.01	%																			4.01	%		3.01	%
Maturity		N/A																				N/A			N/A
SBA debentures										$	36,000				$	44,000					$	80,000		$	80,000		$	80,000
Amounts undisbursed											4,500					3,565						8,065			15,565			17,065
Amounts outstanding											31,500					40,435						71,935			64,435			62,935
Average interest rate											6.02	%				6.00	%					6.01	%		6.11	%		5.86	%
Maturity											9/11-9/15					9/11-9/15						9/11-9/15			9/11-3/14			9/11-3/14
Certificates of deposit																		$	200,212		$	200,212		$	186,538		$	161,199
Average interest rate																			2.95	%		2.95	%		2.46	%		2.02	%
Maturity																			7/05-5/09			7/05-5/09			1/05-5/09			7/04-5-09
Total cash and amounts remaining undisbursed under credit facilities	$	7,360		$	47,293		($	195	)	$	5,498		$	2,009	$	10,828		$	13,406		$	86,199		$	56,175		$	101,274
Total debt outstanding	$	22,700		$	287,209			—		$	31,500			—	$	40,435		$	200,212		$	582,056		$	525,933		$	442,529

(1) In January 2005, MFC entered into a $4 MM revolving note agreement with Atlantic Bank that matures in December 2005, and is secured by medallion loans in process of being sold to the Trust.

(2) In January, 2005, this line of credit was extended for an additional year to 9/06 at up to 50 bp lower rates, with the committed amount adjusting to $275,000,000 immediately, increasing to $325,000,000 at our option, which was exercised.

Loan amortization, prepayments, and sales also provide a source of funding for the Company. Prepayments on loans are influenced significantly by general interest rates, medallion loan market rates, economic conditions, and competition. Loan sales are a major focus of the SBA Section 7(a) loan program conducted by BLL, which is primarily set up to originate and sell loans. Increases in SBA Section 7(a) loan balances in any given period generally reflect timing differences in closing and selling transactions. The Company believes that its credit facilities with MLB and the SBA, deposits generated at MB, and cash flow from operations (after distributions to shareholders) will be adequate to fund the continuing operations of the Company’s loan portfolio. Also, MB is not a RIC, and therefore is able to retain earnings to finance growth.

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

In December 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued SFAS No. 123 (revised 2004), “Share-Based Payment,” (SFAS No. 123R), which supercedes Accounting Principles Board (APB) Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees.” The revised statement addresses the accounting for share-based payment transactions with employees and other third parties, eliminates the ability to account for share-based transactions using APB No. 25 and requires that the compensation costs relating to such transactions be recognized in the consolidated financial statements. FAS No. 123R requires additional disclosures relating to the income tax and cash flow effects resulting from share-based payments. On April 14, 2005, the United States Securities and Exchange Commission announced it would permit most registrants subject to its oversight additional time to implement the requirements in SFAS No. 123(R). As

35

announced, the SEC will permit companies to implement SFAS No. 123(R) at the beginning of their next fiscal year (instead of their next reporting period) that begins after June 15, 2005. The Company is evaluating the requirements of SFAS No. 123(R) and expects that the adoption of SFAS No. 123(R), effective January 1, 2006, will have an impact on its consolidated results of operations and earnings per share. The Company has not yet determined the method of adoption or the potential financial impact of adopting SFAS No. 123(R).

Common Stock

Our common stock is quoted on the Nasdaq National Market under the symbol “TAXI.” Our common stock commenced trading on May 23, 1996. As of August 8, 2005, there were approximately 116 holders of record of the Company’s common stock.

On August 8, 2005, the last reported sale price of our common stock was $9.63 per share. Historically, our common stock has traded at a premium to net asset value per share, and although there can be no assurance, the Company anticipates that its stock will again trade at a premium in the future.

The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, the range of high and low closing prices for the Company’s common stock on the Nasdaq National Market.

	HIGH		LOW
2005
Second Quarter	$	9.78	$	9.10
First Quarter		9.80		8.92
2004
Fourth Quarter	$	9.70	$	8.52
Third Quarter		9.19		6.78
Second Quarter		9.03		7.46
First Quarter		9.25		7.91

As a RIC, we intend to distribute at least 90% of our investment company taxable income to our shareholders. Distributions of our income are generally required to be made within the calendar year the income was earned as a RIC; however, in certain circumstances distributions can be made up to a full calendar year after the income has been earned. Investment company taxable income includes, among other things, interest, dividends, and capital gains reduced by deductible expenses. Our ability to make dividend payments as a RIC is restricted by certain asset coverage requirements under the 1940 Act and has been dependent upon maintenance of our status as a RIC under the Code in the past, by SBA regulations, and under the terms of the SBA debentures. There can be no assurances, however, that we will have sufficient earnings to pay such dividends in the future.

We have adopted a dividend reinvestment plan pursuant to which stockholders may elect to have distributions reinvested in additional shares of common stock. When we declare a dividend or distribution, all participants will have credited to their plan accounts the number of full and fractional shares (computed to three decimal places) that could be obtained with the cash, net of any applicable withholding taxes that would have been paid to them if they were not participants. The number of full and fractional shares is computed at the weighted average price of all shares of common stock purchased for plan participants within the 30 days after the dividend or distribution is declared plus brokerage commissions. The automatic reinvestment of dividends and capital gains distributions will not release plan participants of any income tax that may be payable on the dividend or capital gains distribution. Stockholders may terminate their participation in the dividend reinvestment plan by providing written notice to the Plan Agent at least 10 days before any given dividend payment date. Upon termination, we will issue to a stockholder both a certificate for the number of full shares of common stock owned and a check for any fractional shares, valued at the then current market price, less any applicable brokerage commissions and any other costs of sale. There are no additional fees or expenses for participation in the dividend reinvestment plan. Stockholders may obtain additional information about the dividend reinvestment plan by contacting the Plan Agent at 59 Maiden Lane, New York, NY, 10038.

36

ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES ⁽¹⁾

Period	Total Number of Shares Purchased	Average Price Paid per Share		Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs	Maximum Number of Shares (or Approximate Dollar Value) that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs
November 5 through December 31, 2003	10,816	$	9.20	10,816	$	9,900,492
January 1 through December 31, 2004	952,517		9.00	952,517		11,329,294
January 1 through June 30, 2005	389,900		9.26	389,900		7,720,523
Total	1,353,233		9.07	1,353,233		—

(1) The Company publicly announced its Stock Repurchase Program in a press release dated November 5, 2003, after the Board of Directors approved the repurchase of up to $10,000,000 of the Company’s outstanding common stock, which was increased by an additional $10,000,000 authorization on November 3, 2004. The stock repurchase program expires after a certain number of days, except in certain cases where it is extended through completion of the authorized amounts.

INVESTMENT CONSIDERATIONS

Interest rate fluctuations may adversely affect the interest rate spread we receive on our taxicab medallion and commercial loans.

Because we borrow money to finance the origination of loans, our income is dependent upon the difference between the rate at which we borrow funds and the rate at which we loan funds. While the loans in our portfolio in most cases bear interest at fixed-rates or adjustable-rates (which adjust at various intervals), we finance a substantial portion of such loans by incurring indebtedness with adjustable or floating interest rates (which adjust immediately to changes in rates). As a result, our debt may adjust to a change in interest rates more quickly than the loans in our portfolio. In periods of sharply rising interest rates, our costs of funds would increase, which would reduce our portfolio income before net realized and unrealized gains. Accordingly, like most financial services companies, we face the risk of interest rate fluctuations. Although we intend to continue to manage our interest rate risk through asset and liability management, including the use of interest rate caps, to achieve a positive asset/liability gap at year end, general rises in interest rates may reduce our interest rate spread in the short term. In addition, we rely on our counterparties to perform their obligations under such interest rate caps.

A decrease in prevailing interest rates may lead to more loan prepayments, which could adversely affect our business.

Our borrowers generally have the right to prepay their loans upon payment of a fee ranging from 30 to 120 days interest. A borrower is likely to exercise prepayment rights at a time when the interest rate payable on the borrower’s loan is high relative to prevailing interest rates. In a lower interest rate environment, we will have difficulty re-lending prepaid funds at comparable rates, which may reduce the net interest margin we receive.

We have traditionally qualified to be a RIC, and in order to be taxed as a RIC we must distribute our income. Therefore, we may have a continuing need for capital if we continue to be taxed as a RIC in the future.

We have a continuing need for capital to finance our lending activities. Our current sources of capital and liquidity are the following:

• line of credit for medallion lending;

• raising deposits at MB;

• loan amortization and prepayments;

• sales of participation interests in loans;

• fixed-rate, long-term SBA debentures that are issued to the SBA; and

• borrowings from other financial intermediaries.

In order to be taxed as a RIC, we are required to distribute at least 90% of our investment company taxable income; consequently, we have primarily relied upon external sources of funds to finance growth. At June 30, 2005, we had $40,943,000 available under a revolving credit agreements with commercial banks, $10,308,000 available under a loan sale agreement with a participant bank, $8,065,000 available under outstanding commitments from the SBA, $5,000,000 under a fed Funds Line with a commercial bank, and $1,500,000 of additional deposits that can be raised by MB at existing capital levels.

37

We may have difficulty raising capital to finance our planned level of lending operations.

Although the Company has demonstrated an ability to meet significant debt amortization requirements in the past, received approval to operate MB and begin raising federally-insured deposits, and has several existing sources of liquidity, there can be no assurance that additional funding sources to meet amortization requirements or future growth targets will be successfully obtained. See the additional discussion related to the credit facilities and note agreements in the Liquidity and Capital Resources section on page 33

Due to the Company’s late filing of the 2004 Form 10-K, the Company could have restrictions imposed on it by rules of NASDAQ and the SEC. Such restrictions could include, and are not limited to, such items as not being able to file short form registration statements if the Company were to issue additional common stock to the public. The Company has no current plans for additional equity offerings.

Lending to small businesses involves a high degree of risk and is highly speculative.

Lending to small businesses involves a high degree of business and financial risk, which can result in substantial losses and should be considered speculative. Our borrower base consists primarily of small business owners that have limited resources and that are generally unable to achieve financing from traditional sources. There is generally no publicly available information about these small business owners, and we must rely on the diligence of our employees and agents to obtain information in connection with our credit decisions. In addition, these small businesses often do not have audited financial statements. Some smaller businesses have narrower product lines and market shares than their competition. Therefore, they may be more vulnerable to customer preferences, market conditions or economic downturns, which may adversely affect the return on, or the recovery of, our investment in these businesses.

Our borrowers may default on their loans.

We primarily invest in and lend to companies that may have limited financial resources. Numerous factors may affect a borrower’s ability to repay its loan, including:

• the failure to meet its business plan;

• a downturn in its industry or negative economic conditions;

• the death, disability or resignation of one or more of the key members of management; or

• the inability to obtain additional financing from traditional sources.

Deterioration of a borrower’s financial condition and prospects may be accompanied by deterioration of the collateral for the loan. Expansion of our portfolio and increases in the proportion of our portfolio consisting of commercial loans could have an adverse impact on the credit quality of the portfolio.

We borrow money, which may increase the risk of investing in our common stock.

We use financial leverage through banks and our long-term subordinated SBA debentures. Leverage poses certain risks for our stockholders, including the following:

• it may result in higher volatility of both our net asset value and the market price of our common stock;

• since interest is paid to our creditors before any income is distributed to our stockholders, fluctuations in the interest payable to our creditors may decrease the dividends and distributions to our stockholders; and

• in the event of a liquidation of the Company, our creditors would have claims on our assets superior to the claims of our stockholders.

38

Our failure to remedy certain internal control deficiencies at our BLL subsidiary could have an adverse affect on our business operations.

The Company’s BLL subsidiary has been operating under an agreement with the State of Connecticut to, among other things, improve BLL’s liquidity and capital ratios, correct certain operational weaknesses, improve the quality of assets, and increase the level of valuation allowances, the latter of which has already been reflected in these financial statements. The Board of Directors of BLL has entered into an agreement to address these areas of concern, which are similar to those in previous reports. There can be no assurance that BLL will be able to fully comply with its provisions. BLL has historically represented less than 1% of the profits of the Company.

If we are unable to continue to diversify geographically, our business may be adversely affected if the New York City taxicab industry experiences a sustained economic downturn.

Although we have diversified from the New York City area, a significant portion of our loan revenue is derived from New York City medallion loans collateralized by New York City taxicab medallions. An economic downturn in the New York City taxicab industry could lead to an increase in defaults on our medallion loans. There can be no assurance that we will be able to sufficiently diversify our operations geographically.

An economic downturn could result in certain of our commercial loan customers experiencing declines in business activities, which could lead to difficulties in their servicing of their loans with us, and increasing the level of delinquencies, defaults, and loan losses in our commercial loan portfolio. Although the Company believes the estimates and assumptions used in determining the recorded amounts of net assets and liabilities at June 30, 2005 are reasonable, actual results could differ materially from the estimated amounts recorded in the Company’s financial statements.

The loss of certain key members of our senior management could adversely affect us.

Our success is largely dependent upon the efforts of senior management. The death, incapacity, or loss of the services of certain of these individuals could have an adverse effect on our operations and financial results. There can be no assurance that other qualified officers could be hired.

Acquisitions may lead to difficulties that could adversely affect our operations.

By their nature, corporate acquisitions entail certain risks, including those relating to undisclosed liabilities, the entry into new markets, operational, and personnel matters. We may have difficulty integrating acquired operations or managing problems due to sudden increases in the size of our loan portfolio. In such instances, we might be required to modify our operating systems and procedures, hire additional staff, obtain and integrate new equipment, and complete other tasks appropriate for the assimilation of new business activities. There can be no assurance that we would be successful, if and when necessary, in minimizing these inherent risks or in establishing systems and procedures which will enable us to effectively achieve our desired results in respect of any future acquisitions.

Competition from entities with greater resources and less regulatory restrictions may decrease our profitability.

We compete with banks, credit unions, and other finance companies, some of which are SBICs, in the origination of taxicab medallion loans and commercial loans. Many of these competitors have greater resources than the Company and certain competitors are subject to less restrictive regulations than the Company. As a result, there can be no assurance that we will be able to continue to identify and complete financing transactions that will permit us to continue to compete successfully.

The valuation of our loan portfolio is subjective and we may not be able to recover our estimated value in the event of a foreclosure or sale of a substantial portion of portfolio loans.

Under the 1940 Act, our loan portfolio must be recorded at fair value or “marked-to-market.” Unlike other lending institutions, we are not permitted to establish reserves for loan losses. Instead, the valuation of our investment portfolio is adjusted quarterly to reflect our estimate of the current realizable value of our loan portfolio. Since no ready market exists for this portfolio, fair value is subject to the good faith determination of our management and the approval of our Board of

39

Directors. Because of the subjectivity of these estimates, there can be no assurance that in the event of a foreclosure or the sale of portfolio loans we would be able to recover the amounts reflected on our balance sheet. If liquidity constraints required the sale of a substantial portion of the portfolio, such an action may require the sale of certain assets at amounts less than their carrying amounts.

In determining the value of our portfolio, management and the Board of Directors may take into consideration various factors such as the financial condition of the borrower and the adequacy of the collateral. For example, in a period of sustained increases in market interest rates, management and the Board of Directors could decrease its valuation of the portfolio if the portfolio consists primarily of fixed-rate loans. Our valuation procedures are designed to generate values that approximate the value that would have been established by market forces and are therefore subject to uncertainties and variations from reported results.

Considering these factors, we have determined that the fair value of our portfolio is below its cost basis. At June 30, 2005, our net unrealized depreciation on investments was approximately $13,022,000 or 1.82% of our investment portfolio. Based upon current market conditions and current loan-to-value ratios, management believes, and our Board of Directors concurs, that the net unrealized depreciation on investments is adequate to reflect the fair value of the portfolio.

Changes in taxicab industry regulations that result in the issuance of additional medallions could lead to a decrease in the value of our medallion loan collateral.

Every city in which we originate medallion loans, and most other major cities in the US, limits the supply of taxicab medallions. This regulation results in supply restrictions that support the value of medallions. Actions that loosen these restrictions and result in the issuance of additional medallions into a market could decrease the value of medallions in that market. If this were to occur, the value of the collateral securing our then outstanding medallion loans in that market could be adversely affected. New York City determined to increase the number of medallions by 900, auctioned over a three year period beginning in 2004, preceded by a 25% fare hike. The first of these auctions for 300 medallions concluded in April 2004, and the second for 300 medallions concluded in October 2004, and both generated high levels of bid activity and record medallion prices. Although there can be no assurances, we would expect the final auction in 2005 to obtain similar results. We are unable to forecast with any degree of certainty whether any other potential increases in the supply of medallions will occur.

In New York City, Chicago, Boston, and in other markets where we originate medallion loans, taxicab fares are generally set by government agencies. Expenses associated with operating taxicabs are largely unregulated. As a result, the ability of taxicab operators to recoup increases in expenses is limited in the short term. Escalating expenses can render taxicab operations less profitable, and could cause borrowers to default on loans from the Company, and could potentially adversely affect the value of the Company’s collateral. As mentioned above, New York City approved a 25% fare increase as a part of the auction program which was effective May 1, 2004.

A significant portion of our loan revenue is derived from loans collateralized by New York City taxicab medallions. According to New York City Taxi and Limousine Commission data, over the past 20 years New York City taxicab medallions have appreciated in value an average of 10% each year. However, for sustained periods during that time, taxicab medallions have declined in value. Since December 2003, the value of New York City taxicab medallions increased by approximately 41% for individual medallions and 40% for corporate medallions.

Our failure to re-establish our RIC status in 2004 and beyond could lead to a substantial reduction in the amount of income distributed to our shareholders.

In 2003, changes were enacted to the federal tax laws which, among other things, significantly reduced the tax rate on dividends paid to shareholders from a corporation’s previously taxed income. Assuming we qualify as a RIC for 2004 or subsequent taxable years, we are unable to predict the effect of such changes upon our common stock.

If we do not file as a RIC for more than two consecutive years, and then seek to requalify and elect RIC status, we would be required to recognize gain to the extent of any unrealized appreciation on our assets unless we make a special election to pay corporate-level tax on any such unrealized appreciation recognized during the succeeding 10-year period. Absent such special election, any gain we recognize would be deemed distributed to our stockholders as a taxable distribution.

40

To qualify and be taxed as a RIC, we must meet certain income, diversification, and distribution requirements. However, because we use leverage, we are subject to certain asset coverage ratio requirements set forth in the 1940 Act. These asset coverage requirements could, under certain circumstances, prohibit us from making distributions that are necessary to maintain our RIC status or require that we reduce our leverage.

In addition, the asset coverage and distribution requirements impose significant cash flow management restrictions on us and limit our ability to retain earnings to cover periods of loss, provide for future growth and pay for extraordinary items. Qualification as a RIC is made on an annual basis and, although we and some of our subsidiaries qualified as regulated investment companies in the past, no assurance can be given that each will qualify for such treatment in 2005 and beyond. Failure to qualify as a RIC would subject us to tax on our income and could have material adverse effects on our financial condition and results of operations.

Our SBIC subsidiaries may be unable to meet the investment company requirements, which could result in the imposition of an entity-level tax.

The SBIA regulates some of our subsidiaries. The SBIA restricts distributions by a SBIC. Our SBIC subsidiaries that are also RICs could be prohibited by SBA regulations from making the distributions necessary to qualify as a RIC. Each year, in order to comply with the SBA regulations and the RIC distribution requirements, we must request and receive a waiver of the SBA’s restrictions. While the current policy of the SBA’s Office of SBIC Operations is to grant such waivers if the SBIC makes certain offsetting adjustments to its paid-in capital and surplus accounts, there can be no assurance that this will continue to be the SBA’s policy or that our subsidiaries will have adequate capital to make the required adjustments. If our subsidiaries are unable to obtain a waiver, compliance with the SBA regulations may result in loss of RIC status and a consequent imposition of an entity-level tax.

The Internal Revenue Code’s diversification requirements may limit our ability to expand our business.

These requirements provide that to qualify as a RIC, not more than 25% of the value of our total assets may be invested in the securities (other than US Government securities or securities of other RICs) of any one issuer. While our investments in RIC subsidiaries are not subject to this diversification test so long as these subsidiaries qualify as RICs, our investments in CCU and MB would be subject to this test, and could impact requalification as a RIC.

The merger of Media into CCU in exchange for stock created a diversification issue as well, as it represents 12% of the Company’s RIC assets. The level of the investment will need to be monitored to ensure it remains within the diversification guidelines.

Additionally the Company’s investment in MB, while representing only 19% of the Company’s total RIC assets at March 31, 2005, currently falls well within the guidelines of the 25% test described above. However, as an anticipated future growth vehicle of the Company, the investment in MB will need to be monitored for continued compliance with the test.

Our past use of Arthur Andersen LLP as our independent auditors may pose risks to us and also limit your ability to seek potential recoveries from them related to their work.

Effective July 29, 2002, the Company dismissed its independent auditors, Arthur Andersen LLP (Andersen), in view of recent developments involving Andersen, at that time.

As a public company, we are required to file periodic financial statements with the SEC that have been audited or reviewed by an independent accountant. As our former independent auditors, Andersen provided a report on our consolidated financial statements as of and for each of the five fiscal years in the period ended December 31, 2001. SEC rules require us to obtain Andersen’s consent to the inclusion of its audit report in our public filings. However, Andersen was indicted and found guilty of federal obstruction of justice charges, and has informed the Company that it is no longer able to provide such consent as a result of the departure from Andersen of the former partner and manager responsible for the audit report. Under these circumstances, Rule 437A under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, permits the Company to incorporate the audit report and the audited financial statements without obtaining the consent of Andersen.

The SEC has recently provided regulatory relief designed to allow public companies to dispense with the requirement that they file a consent of Andersen in certain circumstances. Notwithstanding this relief, the inability of

41

Andersen to provide either its consent or customary assurance services to us now and in the future could negatively affect our ability to, among other things, access the public capital markets. Any delay or inability to access the public markets as a result of this situation could have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

We depend on cash flow from our subsidiaries to make dividend payments and other distributions to our shareholders.

We are primarily a holding company, and we derive most of our operating income and cash flow from our subsidiaries. As a result, we rely heavily upon distributions from our subsidiaries to generate the funds necessary to make dividend payments and other distributions to our shareholders. Funds are provided to us by our subsidiaries through dividends and payments on intercompany indebtedness, but there can be no assurance that our subsidiaries will be in a position to continue to make these dividend or debt payments. Furthermore, as a condition of its approval by its regulators, MB is precluded from making any dividend payments for its first three years of operations.

We operate in a highly regulated environment.

We are regulated by the SEC, the SBA, the FDIC, and the Utah Department of Financial Institutions. In addition, changes in the laws or regulations that govern BDCs, RICs, SBICs, or banks may significantly affect our business. Laws and regulations may be changed from time to time, and the interpretations of the relevant laws and regulations also are subject to change. Any change in the laws or regulations that govern our business could have a material impact on our operations.

Our use of brokered deposit sources for MB’s deposit-gathering activities may not be available when needed.

MB relies on the established brokered deposit market to originate deposits to fund its operations. While MB has developed contractual relationships with a diversified group of investment brokers, and the brokered deposit market is well-developed and utilized by many banking institutions, conditions could change that might affect the availability of deposits. If the capital levels at MB fall below the “well-capitalized” level, or if MB experiences a period of sustained operating losses, the cost of attracting deposits from the brokered deposit market could increase significantly, and the ability of MB to raise deposits from this source could be impaired. MB’s ability to manage its growth to stay within the “well-capitalized” level, and the capital level currently required by the FDIC during MB’s first three years of operation, which is also considerably higher than the level required to be classified as “well-capitalized”, is critical to MB’s retaining open access to this funding source.

Consumer lending is a new product line for us that carries a higher risk of loss and could be adversely affected by an economic downturn.

The acquisition of the consumer loan portfolio, and the subsequent commencement of lending operations in this line of business, represents an entry into a new lending market for the Company. Although the purchased portfolio was seasoned, and MB management has considerable experience in originating and managing consumer loans, there can be no assurances that these loans will perform at their historical levels as expected under MB’s management.

By its nature, lending to consumers that have blemishes on their credit reports carries with it a higher risk of loss. Although the net interest margins should be higher to compensate the Company for this increased risk, an economic downturn could result in higher loss rates and lower returns than expected, and could affect the profitability of the consumer loan portfolio.

ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

There has been no material change in disclosure regarding quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk since the Company filed its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004.

ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Under the direction of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, we evaluated our disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting and concluded that (i) our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004 and (ii) no change in internal control over financial reporting occurred during the quarters ended June 30, 2005 and 2004 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, such internal control over financial reporting.

42

PART II- OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

The Company and its subsidiaries are currently involved in various legal proceedings incident to the ordinary course of its business, including collection matters with respect to certain loans. The Company intends to vigorously defend any outstanding claims and pursue its legal rights. In the opinion of the Company’s management and based upon the advice of legal counsel, there is no proceeding pending, or to the knowledge of management threatened, which in the event of an adverse decision would result in a material adverse effect on the Company’s results of operations or financial condition.

ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS

The Company’s Annual Meeting of Stockholders was held on June 17, 2005. The following individuals were elected to the Company’s Board of Directors to serve as Class III Directors until the 2008 Annual Meeting of Stockholders:

NOMINEE	VOTES FOR	VOTES WITHELD
Alvin Murstein	14,464,179	1,637,508
Henry D. Jackson	15,678,293	423,394
Henry L. Aaron	15,006,004	1,095,683

ITEM 6. EXHIBITS

EXHIBITS

Number	Description
10.1	Extension Letter to Loan and Security Agreement, dated as of June 28, 2005, by and between Medallion Financial Corp. and Sterling National Bank. Filed herewith.
10.2	First Amendment to Loan and Security Agreement, dated as of July 28, 2005, by and between Medallion Financial Corp. and Sterling National Bank. Filed herewith.
31.1	Certification of Alvin Murstein pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a) as adopted pursuant to section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Filed herewith.
31.2	Certification of Larry D. Hall pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a) as adopted pursuant to section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Filed herewith.
32.1	Certification of Alvin Murstein pursuant to 18 USC. Section 1350, as adopted, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Filed herewith.
32.2	Certification of Larry D. Hall pursuant to 18 USC. Section 1350, as adopted, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Filed herewith.

IMPORTANT INFORMATION RELATING TO FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 provides a safe harbor for forward-looking statements so long

43

as those statements are identified as forward-looking and are accompanied by meaningful cautionary statements identifying important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those projected in such statements. In connection with certain forward-looking statements contained in this Form 10-K and those that may be made in the future by or on behalf of the Company, the Company notes that there are various factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those set forth in any such forward-looking statements. The forward-looking statements contained in this Form 10-Q were prepared by management and are qualified by, and subject to, significant business, economic, competitive, regulatory and other uncertainties and contingencies, all of which are difficult or impossible to predict and many of which are beyond the control of the Company. Accordingly, there can be no assurance that the forward-looking statements contained in this Form 10-Q will be realized or that actual results will not be significantly higher or lower. The statements have not been audited by, examined by, compiled by or subjected to agreed-upon procedures by independent accountants, and no third-party has independently verified or reviewed such statements. Readers of this Form 10-Q should consider these facts in evaluating the information contained herein. In addition, the business and operations of the Company are subject to substantial risks which increase the uncertainty inherent in the forward-looking statements contained in this Form 10-Q. The inclusion of the forward-looking statements contained in this Form 10-Q should not be regarded as a representation by the Company or any other person that the forward-looking statements contained in this Form 10-Q will be achieved. In light of the foregoing, readers of this Form 10-Q are cautioned not to place undue reliance on the forward-looking statements contained herein. These risks and others that are detailed in this Form 10-Q and other documents that the Company files from time to time with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, and any current reports on Form 8-K must be considered by any investor or potential investor in the Company.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

MEDALLION FINANCIAL CORP.
Date:	August 9, 2005
By:	/s/ Alvin Murstein
	Alvin Murstein
	Chairman and
	Chief Executive Officer
By:	/s/ Larry D. Hall
	Larry D. Hall
	Senior Vice President and
	Chief Financial Officer
	Signing on behalf of the registrant
	as principal financial and accounting officer.

44

EX-10.1

Exhibit 10.1

	500 SEVENTH AVENUE NEW YORK, NY 10018-1502
	PHONE: 212-575-4449 FAX: 213-382-3442
	thomas.braunstein@sterlingbancorp.com www.sterlingbancorp.com
	Thomas Braunstein First Vice President

June 28, 2005

Mr. Alvin Murstein

Medallion Financial, Inc.

437 Madison Ave. 38^th Floor

New York, NY 10022

. Re: $15,000,000 Revolving Credit Note and Loan and Security Agreement dated April 26, 2004 and subsequently extended to June 30, 2005

Dear Mr. Murstein:

Reference is made to the Loan and Security Agreement (“Agreement”) date April 26, 2004 by and between Medallion Financial Corp. (“Borrower”) and Sterling National Bank (“Lender”) and the underlying Revolving Credit Note (“Promissory Note”), which the Borrower executed in the original principal amount of fifteen million dollars ($15,000,000.00), which were subsequently extended to June 30, 2005. As you know, the Lender’s obligation to make advances under the Agreement expires, and all amounts due and owing under the Promissory Note and the Agreement are payable in full, on June 30, 2005, (the “Revolving Credit Termination Date”). Lender is willing to extend the Revolving Credit Termination Date to July 31, 2005 (the “Extended Revolving Credit Termination Date”), subject to the following terms and conditions:

1. In the event of any default under the Agreement or the Promissory Note, the loan and all accrued and unpaid interest shall be due and payable immediately upon demand.

2. All other terms and conditions of the Agreement and Promissory Note remain in full force and effect.

3. The Extended Revolving Credit Termination Date shall be effective upon receipt by the Lender of a copy of this letter signed by the Borrower no later than June 30, 2005.

In order to induce Lender to grant this extension Borrower hereby represents that: (a) there is no default or event of default under the Agreement, the Note or any other loan document, (b) the principal amount currently outstanding under the Note and the Agreement is $10,700,000.00, and the Borrower has no claims, defenses or offsets against the payment thereof, and (c) the Borrower ratifies and reaffirms the Note, the Agreement and the other loan documents in their entirety.

If the foregoing is satisfactory, please have a copy of this letter signed by the Borrower and return the executed copy to me by overnight delivery service.

Yours truly,

Sterling National Bank

/s/ Thomas M. Braunstein

Thomas M. Braunstein

First Vice President

AGREED AND ACCEPTED THIS 28 DAY OF JUNE, 2005

Medallion Financial Corp.
By:	/s/ Alvin Murstein
	Name: Alvin Murstein
	Title: CEO

EX-10.2

Exhibit 10.2

FIRST AMENDMENT TO LOAN AND SECURITY AGREEMENT

THIS FIRST AMENDMENT TO LOAN AND SECURITY AGREEMENT (the “Amendment”) is dated July 28, 2005 and is by and between MEDALLION FINANCIAL CORP., a Delaware corporation having an address of 437 Madison Avenue, New York, New York 10022 (the “Borrower”), and STERLING NATIONAL BANK, a national banking association having an address of 650 Fifth Avenue, New York, New York 10019 (the “Bank”).

RECITALS

A. The Borrower and the Bank entered into a Loan and Security Agreement dated April 26, 2004 (the “Loan Agreement”), pursuant to which the Bank has agreed to extend certain credit and make certain loans to the Borrower in an aggregate principal amount not to exceed $15,000,000.

B. The Borrower has requested, and the Bank has agreed to make, certain amendments to the Loan Agreement, all as more fully described herein.

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as follows:

AGREEMENT

1. Defined Terms. Except as otherwise indicated herein, all words and terms defined in the Loan Agreement shall have the same meanings when used herein.

2. Extension of Revolving Credit Termination Date. The Revolving Credit Termination Date is hereby extended to June 30, 2006. Accordingly, the definition of the term “Revolving Credit Termination Date” set forth in Section 1.1 of the Loan Agreement is hereby amended and restated in its entirety as follows:

“Revolving Credit Termination Date” shall mean June 30, 2006.

3. Amendments to Other Loan Documents. Each of the other Loan Documents is hereby amended to the extent necessary to reflect the amendments to the terms of the Loan Agreement effected by this Amendment. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, each of the other Loan Documents shall secure the Note (as defined below) to the same extent, and with the same effect, as it secured the Prior Note (as defined below). The Borrower shall take or cause to be taken such actions, and shall execute, deliver, file and/or record or cause to be executed, delivered, filed and/or recorded such documents and other instruments, as the Bank shall deem to be necessary or advisable in order to confirm, implement or perfect the amendments to the other Loan Documents effected by this Paragraph 3.

4. No Defenses. The Borrower acknowledges that, as of July 26, 2005, the aggregate outstanding principal balance under the Revolving Credit Loan was $10,700,000. The Borrower acknowledges and agrees that, as of the date hereof, it has no offsets, counterclaims or

defenses of any nature whatsoever to its Obligations to the Bank under the Loan Agreement or any of the other Loan Documents, and hereby expressly waives and releases any and all claims against the Bank which exist on the date hereof with respect thereto.

5. Substitute Note. Concurrently herewith, the Borrower is executing and delivering to the Bank a Substitute Revolving Credit Note in the maximum principal amount of $15,000,000 (the “Note”) in substitution for, but not in repayment of, the Revolving Credit Note dated April 26, 2004 in the maximum principal amount of $15,000,000 previously issued by the Borrower to the Bank (the “Prior Note”). The execution and delivery by the Borrower of the Note pursuant to the provisions hereof shall not constitute a refinancing, repayment, accord and satisfaction or novation of the Prior Note or the indebtedness evidenced thereby.

6. Representations and Warranties. In order to induce the Bank to enter into this Amendment and amend the Loan Agreement as provided herein, the Borrower hereby represents and warrants to the Bank that:

(a) All of the representations and warranties of the Borrower set forth in the Loan Agreement are true, complete and correct in all material respects on and as of the date hereof with the same force and effect as if made on and as of the date hereof and as if set forth at length herein.

(b) After giving effect to this Amendment, no Event of Default presently exists and is continuing on and as of the date hereof.

(c) Since the date of the Borrower’s most recent financial statements delivered to the Bank, the Borrower has not experienced a material adverse effect in its business, operations or financial condition.

(d) The Borrower has full power and authority to execute, deliver and perform any action or step which may be necessary to carry out the terms of this Amendment and this Amendment has been duly executed and delivered by the Borrower and is the legal, valid and binding obligation of the Borrower enforceable in accordance with its terms, subject to any applicable bankruptcy, insolvency, general equity principles or other similar laws affecting the enforcement of creditors’ rights generally.

(e) The execution, delivery and performance of this Amendment will not (i) violate any provision of any existing law, statute, rule, regulation or ordinance, (ii) conflict with, result in a breach of, or constitute a default under (A) the certificate of incorporation or by-laws of the Borrower, (B) any order, judgment, award or decree of any court, governmental authority, bureau or agency, or (C) any mortgage, indenture, lease, contract or other material agreement or undertaking to which the Borrower is a party or by which the Borrower or any of its properties or assets may be bound, or (iii) result in the creation or imposition of any lien or other encumbrance upon or with respect to any property or asset now owned or hereafter acquired by the Borrower, other than liens in favor of the Bank, except, in the case of clauses (ii) and (iii) above, for any deviation from the foregoing which would not reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect.

2

(f) No consent, license, permit, approval or authorization of, exemption by, notice to, report to, or registration, filing or declaration with any person is required in connection with the execution, delivery and performance by the Borrower of this Amendment or the validity thereof or the transactions contemplated thereby, other than (i) filing or recordation of financing statements and like documents in connection with the Liens granted in favor of the Bank, (ii) those consents, if they were not obtained or made, which would not reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect and (iii) filing which the Borrower may be obligated to make with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

7. Bank Costs. The Borrower shall reimburse the Bank on demand for all costs, including reasonable legal fees and expenses and recording fees, incurred by the Bank in connection with this Amendment and the transactions referenced herein. If payment of such costs is not made within ten days of the Bank’s demand therefor, the Bank may, and the Borrower irrevocably authorizes the Bank to, charge the Borrower’s account with the Bank or make an Advance under the Revolving Credit Loan in order to satisfy such obligation of the Borrower.

8. Counterparts. This Amendment may be signed in several counterparts, each of which shall be an original and all of which shall constitute one and the same instrument.

9. No Change. Except as expressly set forth herein, all of the terms and provisions of the Loan Agreement shall continue in full force and effect.

10. Governing Law. This Amendment shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of New York.

[Balance of page intentionally left blank]

3

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Amendment to be duly executed and delivered by their proper and duly authorized officers as of the date set forth on the first page hereof.

MEDALLION FINANCIAL CORP.
By:	/s/Alvin Murstein
	Name: Alvin Murstein
	Title:   Chairman & Chief Executive Officer

STERLING NATIONAL BANK
By:	/s/Thomas Braunstein
	Name: Thomas Braunstein
	Title:   First Vice President

4

EX-31.1

Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATIONS

Certification of Alvin Murstein

I, Alvin Murstein, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Medallion Financial Corp.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

d) Disclosed in this report any change in registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: August 9, 2005
By:	/s/ Alvin Murstein
	Alvin Murstein
	Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

45

EX-31.2

Exhibit 31.2

Certification of Larry D. Hall

I, Larry D. Hall, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Medallion Financial Corp.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

d) Disclosed in this report any change in registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: August 9, 2005
By:	/s/ Larry D. Hall
	Larry D. Hall
	Senior Vice President and
	Chief Financial Officer

46

EX-32.1

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Medallion Financial Corp. (the “Company”) for the quarter ending June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, based on my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the Report.

By:	/s/ Alvin Murstein
	Chairman and
	Chief Executive Officer
Date: August 9, 2005

47

EX-32.2

Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Medallion Financial Corp. (the “Company”) for the quarter ending June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 USC. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, based on my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the Report.

By:	/s/ Larry D. Hall
	Senior Vice President and
	Chief Financial Officer
Date: August 9, 2005

48