XML 111 R9.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.10.0.1
Trade and Other Receivables
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2018
Trade and Other Receivables  
Trade and Other Receivables

(A.2) Trade and Other Receivables

Accounting Policies, Management Judgments, and Sources of Estimation Uncertainty

 

We measure trade receivables and contract assets from contracts with customers at amortized cost less expected credit losses. We account for expected credit losses by recording an allowance on a portfolio basis. We apply the simplified impairment approach in that, on initial measurement of the receivables, we consider all credit losses that are expected to occur during the lifetime of the receivables. We use a provision matrix to estimate these losses.

Additionally, we recognize allowances for individual receivables if there is objective evidence of credit impairment.

Account balances are written off either partially or in full if we judge that the likelihood of recovery is remote.

For information about how the default risk for trade receivables is analyzed and managed, how the loss rates for the provision matrix are determined, how credit impairment is determined and what our criteria for write offs are, see the section on credit risk in Note (F.1).

In our Consolidated Income Statements, net gains /losses include income /expenses from expected credit loss allowances from applying the provision matrix, from credit-impaired customer balances, and from write offs and related reversals which are included in other operating income/expense, net. Gains /losses from foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations are included in Other non-operating income/expense, net.

Determining our expected credit loss allowance involves significant judgment. In this judgment, we primarily consider our historical experience with credit losses in the respective provision matrix risk class and current data on overdue receivables. We expect that our historical default rates represent a reasonable approximation for future expected customer defaults. Besides historical data, our judgment used in developing the provision matrix considers reasonable and supportable forward-looking information (for example, changes in country risk ratings, and fluctuations in credit default swaps of the countries in which our customers are located).

The assessment of whether a receivable is collectible involves the use of judgment and requires us to make assumptions about customer defaults that could change significantly.

In applying this judgment, we evaluate available information about a particular customer’s financial situation to determine whether it is probable that a credit loss had occurred and, if so, whether the amount of the loss is reasonably estimable. If it is, an allowance for that specific account is then necessary. Basing the expected credit loss allowance for the remaining receivables primarily on our historical loss experience likewise requires judgment, as history may not be indicative of future development. Also, including reasonable and supportable forward-looking information in the loss rates of the expected credit loss allowance requires judgment, as they may not provide a reliable prognosis for future development. Changes in our estimates about the loss allowance could materially impact reported assets and expenses, and our profit could be adversely affected if actual credit losses exceed our estimates.

 

Trade and Other Receivables

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

€ millions

 

2018

 

2017

 

    

Current

    

Non-Current

    

Total

    

Current

    

Non-Current

    

Total

Trade receivables, net

 

6,182

 

 6

 

6,188

 

5,809

 

 1

 

5,810

Other receivables

 

180

 

112

 

293

 

90

 

116

 

207

Total

 

6,362

 

118

 

6,480

 

5,899

 

118

 

6,017

 

Contract assets as at December 31, 2018, were €116 million (January 1, 2018: €14 million).

For more information about financial risk, how we manage credit risk, and details of our trade receivables and contract assets allowances, see Note (F.1). For information about the transition to IFRS 9, see Note  (F.3).