-----BEGIN PRIVACY-ENHANCED MESSAGE----- Proc-Type: 2001,MIC-CLEAR Originator-Name: webmaster@www.sec.gov Originator-Key-Asymmetric: MFgwCgYEVQgBAQICAf8DSgAwRwJAW2sNKK9AVtBzYZmr6aGjlWyK3XmZv3dTINen TWSM7vrzLADbmYQaionwg5sDW3P6oaM5D3tdezXMm7z1T+B+twIDAQAB MIC-Info: RSA-MD5,RSA, EzElNaUvuarhinX9ophufooXuEvo5fwuRlpnB7Kw5c8jj5YeTyJPOTnNbrvkO3T+ KSNXdLN15mVmiERv46ND0w== 0001000180-99-000010.txt : 19990825 0001000180-99-000010.hdr.sgml : 19990825 ACCESSION NUMBER: 0001000180-99-000010 CONFORMED SUBMISSION TYPE: 10-Q/A PUBLIC DOCUMENT COUNT: 2 CONFORMED PERIOD OF REPORT: 19990630 FILED AS OF DATE: 19990824 FILER: COMPANY DATA: COMPANY CONFORMED NAME: SANDISK CORP CENTRAL INDEX KEY: 0001000180 STANDARD INDUSTRIAL CLASSIFICATION: COMPUTER STORAGE DEVICES [3572] IRS NUMBER: 770191793 STATE OF INCORPORATION: DE FISCAL YEAR END: 1231 FILING VALUES: FORM TYPE: 10-Q/A SEC ACT: SEC FILE NUMBER: 000-26734 FILM NUMBER: 99698647 BUSINESS ADDRESS: STREET 1: 140 CASPIAN COURT CITY: SUNNYVALE STATE: CA ZIP: 94089 BUSINESS PHONE: 4085620500 MAIL ADDRESS: STREET 1: 140 CASPIAN COURT CITY: SUNNYVALE STATE: CA ZIP: 94089 10-Q/A 1 FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED JUNE 30, 1999 Form 10-Q/A SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 (Mark one) X Quarterly report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities - --------- Exchange Act of 1934 For the quarterly period ended June 30, 1999 OR Transition report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities - --------- Exchange Act of 1934 For the transition period from to ----- ----- Commission File Number 0-26734 SanDisk Corporation (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) Delaware 77-0191793 (State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer incorporation or organization) Identification No.) 140 Caspian Court, Sunnyvale, California 94089 (Address of principal executive offices) (Zip code) (408) 542-0500 (Registrant's telephone number, including area code) N/A (Former name, former address, and former fiscal year, if changed since last report.) Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes X No Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer's classes of common stock as of March 31, 1999 Common Stock, $0.001 par value 27,156,980 ------------------------------ ---------- Class Number of shares SanDisk Corporation Index PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION Page No. Item 1. Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements: Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets June 30, 1999 and December 31, 1998........................... 3 Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income Three and six months ended June 30, 1999 and 1998............. 4 Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows Six months ended June 30, 1999 and 1998....................... 5 Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.............. 6 Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.................................... 10 Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk........28 PART II. OTHER INFORMATION Item 1. Legal Proceedings................................................ 29 Item 2. Changes in Securities............................................ 29 Item 3. Defaults upon Senior Securities.................................. 29 Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.............. 29 Item 5. Other Information................................................ 29 Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K................................. 30 Signatures....................................................... 32 Page 2 PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION SanDisk Corporation Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets (In thousands) ASSETS June 30, December 31, 1999 1998* ---------- ---------- (unaudited) Current Assets: Cash and cash equivalents $ 12,766 $ 15,384 Short-term investments 132,182 119,074 Accounts receivable, net 29,213 20,400 Inventories 17,332 8,922 Deferred tax assets 15,900 15,900 Prepaid expenses and other current assets 3,700 6,694 ----------- ----------- Total current assets 211,093 186,374 Property and equipment, net 22,410 17,542 Investment in foundry 51,208 51,208 Deposits and other assets 794 617 ----------- ----------- Total Assets $ 285,505 $ 255,741 =========== =========== LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY Current Liabilities: Accounts payable $ 18,563 $ 6,938 Accrued payroll and related expenses 5,523 3,768 Other accrued liabilities 14,316 9,745 Deferred revenue 27,232 27,452 ----------- ----------- Total current liabilities 65,634 47,903 Stockholders' Equity: Common stock 188,938 186,120 Retained earnings 30,933 21,718 ----------- ----------- Total stockholders' equity 219,871 207,838 Total Liabilities and ----------- ----------- Stockholders' Equity $ 285,505 $ 255,741 =========== =========== The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements. * Information derived from the audited Consolidated Financial Statements. Page 3 SanDisk Corporation Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income (In thousands, except per share data; unaudited) Three months ended Six months ended June 30, June 30, 1999 1998 1999 1998 ------- ------- ------- ------- Revenues: Product $42,300 $23,480 $78,226 $48,906 License and royalty 10,249 7,881 18,459 16,557 ------- ------- ------- ------- Total revenues 52,549 31,361 96,685 65,463 Cost of sales 30,858 20,560 57,367 38,332 ------- ------- ------- ------- Gross profits 21,691 10,801 39,318 27,131 Operating expenses: Research and development 6,007 4,474 11,219 8,805 Sales and marketing 5,755 4,248 10,928 8,199 General and administrative 2,896 1,709 5,290 3,753 ------- ------- ------- ------- Total operating expenses 14,658 10,431 27,437 20,757 Operating income 7,033 370 11,881 6,374 Interest and other income, net 1,465 1,278 3,069 2,617 ------- ------- ------- ------- Income before taxes 8,498 1,648 14,950 8,991 Provision for income taxes 2,804 595 4,933 3,235 ------- ------- ------- ------- Net income $ 5,694 $ 1,053 $10,017 $ 5,756 ======= ======= ======= ======= Net income per share Basic $ 0.21 $ 0.04 $ 0.37 $ 0.22 Diluted $ 0.19 $ 0.04 $ 0.34 $ 0.21 Shares used in computing net income per share Basic 26,943 26,168 26,855 26,094 Diluted 29,514 27,834 29,414 27,928 The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements. Page 4 SanDisk Corporation Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (In thousands; unaudited Six months ended June 30, 1999 1998 -------- -------- Cash flows from operating activities: Net income $ 10,017 $ 5,756 Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: Depreciation 3,750 3,166 Accounts receivable, net (8,813) 3,235 Inventory (8,410) (5,920) Prepaid expenses and other assets 2,817 (90) Accounts payable 11,626 (3,197) Accrued payroll and related expenses 1,755 (938) Other accrued liabilities 4,571 (1,993) Deferred revenue (220) (1,746) -------- -------- Total adjustments 7,076 (7,483) -------- -------- Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities 17,093 (1,727) Cash flows from investing activities: Purchases of short term investments (73,456) (85,654) Proceeds from sale of short term investments 59,546 81,632 Acquisition of capital equipment (8,619) (2,865) -------- -------- Net cash used in investing activities (22,529) (6,887) Cash flows from financing activities: Sale of common stock 2,818 1,193 -------- -------- Net cash provided by financing activities 2,818 1,193 -------- -------- Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents (2,618) (7,421) Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period 15,384 20,888 -------- -------- Cash and cash equivalents at end of period $ 12,766 $ 13,467 ======== ======== The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements. Page 5 SanDisk Corporation Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements 1. These interim condensed consolidated financial statements are unaudited but reflect, in the opinion of management, all normal recurring adjustments necessary to present fairly the financial position of SanDisk Corporation and its subsidiaries (the "Company") as of June 30, 1999, the results of operations for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 1999 and 1998 and cash flows for the six month periods ended June 30, 1999 and 1998. Because all the disclosures required by generally accepted accounting principles are not included, these interim condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited financial statements and notes thereto in the Company's annual report on Form 10-K/A as of, and for the year ended December 31, 1998. The condensed consolidated balance sheet data as of December 31, 1998 was derived from the audited financial statements. The results of operations for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 1999 and cash flows for the six month periods ended June 30, 1999 are not necessarily indicative of results of operations and cash flows for any future period. 2. The Company's fiscal year ends on the Sunday closest to December 31, and each fiscal quarter ends on the Sunday closest to March 31, June 30, and September 30. The second fiscal quarter of 1999 and 1998 ended on June 27, 1999 and June 28, 1998, respectively. Fiscal year 1998 was 52 weeks long and ended on December 27, 1998. Fiscal year 1999 is 53 weeks long and ends on January 2, 2000. For ease of presentation, the accompanying financial statements have been shown as ending on the last day of the calendar month. 3. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates. 4. The components of inventory consist of the following: June 30, December 31, 1999 1998 -------- ----------- (In thousands) Raw materials $ 2,646 $ 2,710 Work-in-process 9,866 3,818 Finished goods 4,820 2,394 -------- ------- $ 17,332 $ 8,922 ======== ======= 5. The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings per share: Page 6
Three months ended Six months ended June 30, June 30, 1999 1998 1999 1998 ------- ------- ------- ------ (In thousands, except per share amounts) Numerator: Numerator for basic and diluted net income per share - net income $ 5,694 $ 1,053 $10,017 $ 5,756 ======= ======= ======= ======= Denominator for basic net income per share: Weighted average common shares 26,943 26,168 26,855 26,094 ------- ------- ------- ------- Shares used in computing basic net income per share 26,943 26,168 26,855 26,094 ======= ======= ======= ======= Basic net income per share $ 0.21 $ 0.04 $ 0.37 $ 0.22 ======= ======= ======= ======= Denominator for diluted net income per share: Weighted average common shares 26,943 26,168 26,855 26,094 Employee stock options and warrants to purchase common stock 2,571 1,666 2,559 1,834 ------- ------- ------- ------- Shares used in computing diluted net income per share 29,514 27,834 29,414 27,928 ======= ======= ======= ======= Diluted net income per share $ 0.19 $ 0.04 $ 0.34 $ 0.21 ======= ======= ======= =======
For the three and six month periods ending June 30, 1999, options to purchase 100,465 and 55,609 shares of common stock, respectively have been excluded from the earnings per share calculation, as their effect is antidilutive. For the three and six month period ended June 30, 1998, options to purchase 885,839 and 254,634 shares of common stock, respectively, have been excluded from the earnings per share calculation, as their effect is antidilutive. 6. To preserve its intellectual property rights, the Company believes it may be necessary to initiate litigation with one or more third parties, including but not limited to those the Company has notified of possible patent infringement. In addition, one or more of these parties, or others, may bring suit against the Company. In March 1998, the Company filed a complaint in federal court against Lexar Media, Inc. ("Lexar") for infringement of a fundamental flashdisk patent. Lexar has disputed the Company's claim of patent infringement, claimed SanDisk's patent is invalid or unenforceable and asserted various counterclaims including unfair competition, violation of the Lanham Act, patent misuse, interference with prospective economic advantage, trade defamation and fraud. SanDisk has denied each of Lexar's counterclaims. In July 1998, the federal district court denied Lexar's request to have the case dismissed on the grounds the Company failed to perform an adequate prefiling investigation. Discovery in the Lexar suit commenced in August 1998. On February 22, 1999, the Federal District Court considered arguments and papers submitted by the parties regarding the scope and proper interpretation of the asserted claims in SanDisk's patent at issue in the Lexar suit. On March 4, 1999, the Federal District Court issued its ruling on the proper construction of the claim terms in SanDisk's patent. On July 30, 1999, the Company filed a motion for partial summary judgment that Lexar CompactFlash and PC Cards contributorily infringe SanDisk's patent. This motion is scheduled to Page 7 be heard in September 1999. In August 1999, we had a mandatory settlement meeting with Lexar. No settlement was reached through this meeting. A trial date has not yet been set. The Company intends to vigorously enforce its patents, but there can be no assurance that these efforts will be successful. In May 1999, Lexar filed a complaint against the Company for claims of unfair competition, false advertising, trade libel and intentional and negligent interference with prospective business advantage. On July 1, 1999, the Company filed a motion to dismiss the Lexar complaint. Also, in July 1999, Lexar filed a motion for preliminary injunction seeking to stop certain advertising practices that Lexar alleges were misleading. The Company intends to vigorously oppose this motion. Both motions are scheduled to be heard in September 1999. There can be no assurances that these motions will be decided in favor of the Company. From time to time the Company agrees to indemnify certain of its suppliers and customers for alleged patent infringement. The scope of such indemnity varies but may in some instances include indemnification for damages and expenses, including attorneys' fees. The Company may from time to time be engaged in litigation as a result of such indemnification obligations. Third party claims for patent infringement are excluded from coverage under the Company's insurance policies. There can be no assurance that any future obligation to indemnify the Company's customers or suppliers, will not have a material adverse effect on the Company's business, financial condition and results of operations. Any litigation, whether as a plaintiff or as a defendant, will likely result in significant expense to the Company and divert the efforts of the Company's technical and management personnel, whether or not such litigation is ultimately determined in favor of the Company. In the event of an adverse result in any such litigation, the Company could be required to pay substantial damages, cease the manufacture, use and sale of infringing products, expend significant resources to develop non-infringing technology or obtain licenses to the infringing technology, or discontinue the use of certain processes. Accordingly, there can be no assurance that any of the foregoing matters, or any future litigation, will not have a material adverse effect on the Company's business, financial condition and results of operations. 7. The Company had a credit agreement (the Agreement) with a bank, which expired in July 1999. At June 30, 1999, there were no amounts outstanding under the line of credit. The Agreement contained covenants that required the Company to maintain certain financial ratios and levels of net worth and prohibited the payment of cash dividends to stockholders. The Company was in compliance with these covenants at June 30, 1999. 8. Certain of the Company's balance sheet accounts and purchase commitments are denominated in Japanese Yen. The Company enters into foreign exchange contracts to hedge against changes in foreign currency exchange rates. The effects of movements in currency exchange rates on these instruments are recognized when the related operating revenues and expenses are recognized. The impact of movements in currency exchange rates on foreign exchange contracts substantially mitigates the related impact on the underlying items hedged. At June 30, 1999, forward contracts with a notional amount of $11.9 million were outstanding. 9. Accumulated other comprehensive income presented in the accompanying balance sheet consists of the accumulated unrealized gains and loses on available-for-sale marketable securities, net of the related tax effects, for all periods presented. Page 8 Three months ended Six months ended June 30, June 30, 1999 1998 1999 1998 -------- -------- -------- -------- (In thousands) Net income $ 5,694 $ 1,053 $ 10,017 $ 5,756 Unrealized gain (loss) on available-for-sale securities (550) 19 (802) 144 -------- -------- -------- -------- Comprehensive income $ 5,144 $ 1,072 $ 9,215 $ 5,900 ======== ======== ======== ======== Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) was ($331,000) and $471,000 at June 30, 1999 and December 31, 1998, respectively. Page 9 Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations Certain statements in this discussion and analysis are forward looking statements based on current expectations, and entail various risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed in such forward looking statements. Such risks and uncertainties are discussed below and in the Company's Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 1998 under the heading "Factors That May Affect Future Results." Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward looking statements, which speak only as of the date hereof. The Company undertakes no obligation to update these forward looking statements to reflect events or circumstances occurring after the date hereof. The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the Company's consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto. Overview The Company was founded in 1988 to develop and market flash data storage systems. The Company sells its products to the consumer electronics and industrial/communications markets. During 1998, the percentage of the Company's product sales attributable to the consumer electronics market, particularly sales of CompactFlash for use in digital camera applications, increased substantially. This increase in sales to the consumer market resulted in a shift to lower capacity products, which typically have lower average selling prices and gross margins than higher capacity products. In addition, these products are frequently sold into the retail channel, which usually has shorter customer order lead-times than the other channels used by the Company, thereby decreasing the Company's ability to accurately forecast future production needs. The Company believes its CompactFlash products will continue to represent a majority of the Company's sales as the popularity of consumer applications, including digital cameras, increases. The percentage of sales attributable to orders received and fulfilled in the same quarter continues to be more than 50% of quarterly product revenues, in response, the Company is continuing to work to shorten its manufacturing cycle times. The Company's operating results are affected by a number of factors including the volume of product sales, the timing of significant orders, competitive pricing pressures, the ability of the Company to match supply with demand, changes in product and customer mix, market acceptance of new or enhanced versions of the Company's products, changes in the channels through which the Company's products are distributed, timing of new product announcements and introductions by the Company and its competitors, the timing of license and royalty revenues, fluctuations in product costs, availability of foundry capacity, variations in manufacturing cycle times, fluctuations in manufacturing yields and manufacturing utilization, increased research and development expenses, and exchange rate fluctuations. In addition, as the proportion of the Company's products sold for use in consumer electronics applications continues to increase, the Company's revenues may become subject to seasonal declines in the first quarter of each year. See "Factors That May Affect Future Results - Our Operating Results May Fluctuate Significantly" and "There is Seasonality in Our Business." Beginning in late 1995, the Company adopted a strategy of licensing its flash technology, including its patent portfolio, to selected third party manufacturers of flash products. To date, the Company has entered into patent cross-license agreements with a number of companies, and it intends to pursue opportunities to enter into additional licenses. The Company's current license agreements provide for the payment of license fees, royalties, or a combination thereof, to the Company. The timing and amount of these payments can vary substantially from quarter to quarter, depending on the terms of each agreement and, in some cases, the timing of sales of products by the other parties. As a result, license and royalty revenues have fluctuated significantly in the past and are likely to continue to fluctuate in the future. Given the relatively high gross margins associated with license and royalty revenues, gross margins and net income are likely to fluctuate more with changes in license and royalty revenues than with changes in product revenues. SanDisk markets its products using a combination of its direct sales organization, distributors, manufacturers' representatives, private label partners, OEMs and retailers. The Company expects that sales through the retail channel will continue to comprise an increasing share of total revenues in the future, and Page 10 that a substantial portion of its sales into the retail channel will be made to participants that will have the right to return unsold products. The Company does not recognize revenues from these sales until the products are sold to the end customers. Historically, a majority of the Company's sales have been to a limited number of customers. The Company expects that sales of its products to a limited number of customers will continue to account for a substantial portion of its product revenues for the foreseeable future. The Company has also experienced significant changes in the composition of its customer base from year to year and expects this pattern to continue as market demand for such customers' products fluctuates. The loss of, or significant reduction in purchases by major customers, could have a material adverse effect on the Company's business, financial condition and results of operations. See "Factors That May Affect Future Results - Sales to a Small Number of Customers Represent a Significant Portion of Our Revenues." Due to the emerging nature of the Company's target markets and certain planned product transitions, the Company has had difficulty forecasting future inventory levels required to meet customer demand. As a result of both contractual obligations and manufacturing cycle times, the Company has been required to order wafers from its foundries several months in advance of the ultimate shipment of its products. Under the Company's wafer supply agreements, there are limits on the number of wafers the Company can order and the Company's ability to change that quantity is restricted. Accordingly, the Company's ability to react to significant fluctuations in demand for its products is limited. As a result, the Company has not been able to match its purchases of wafers to specific customer orders and therefore the Company has from time to time taken write downs for potential excess inventory purchased prior to the receipt of customer orders. For example, in the second quarter of 1998, the Company's product gross margins declined to 12% from 30% in the previous quarter due in part to a write down of this inventory to reflect inventory at net realizable value. These adjustments decrease gross margins in the quarter reported and have resulted, and could in the future result, in fluctuations in gross margins on a quarter to quarter basis. See "Factors That May Affect Future Results - Our Operating Results May Fluctuate Significantly." Export sales are an important part of the Company's business. In 1998, product sales to Japan declined 19% from the prior year, due in part to the Asian economic crisis. While a majority of the Company's revenues from sales to Japan and other Asian countries are derived from OEM customers who plan to export a portion of their products to countries outside of Asia, the Asian economic crisis may continue to adversely effect the Company's revenues to the extent that demand for the Company's products in Asia declines. Given the recent economic conditions in Asia and the weakness of many Asian currencies relative to the United States dollar, the Company's products may be relatively more expensive in Asia, which could result in a decrease in the Company's sales in that region. The Company may also experience pressure on its gross margins as a result of increased price competition from Asian competitors. While most of the Company's sales are denominated in U.S. Dollars, the Company invoices certain Japanese customers in Japanese Yen. Exchange rate fluctuations can therefore affect the Company's business, financial condition and results of operations. See "Factors That May Affect Future Results - We Face Risks Associated with International Operations." For the foreseeable future, the Company expects to realize a significant portion of its revenues from recently introduced and new products. Typically new products initially have lower gross margins than more mature products because the manufacturing yields are lower at the start of manufacturing each successive product generation. In addition, manufacturing yields are generally lower at the start of manufacturing any new product. To remain competitive, the Company is focusing on a number of programs to lower its manufacturing costs, including development of future generations of double density ("D2") flash and advanced technology wafers. There can be no assurance that such products or processes will be successfully developed by the Company or that development of such processes will lower manufacturing costs. In addition, the Company anticipates that price competition will continue in the future, which could result in decreased average selling prices and lower gross margins. See "Factors That May Affect Future Results -We Must Achieve Acceptable Wafer Manufacturing Yields." Page 11 Year 2000 Readiness Disclosure The Company is aware of problems associated with computer systems as the Year 2000 approaches. Year 2000 problems are the result of common computer programming techniques that result in systems that do not function properly when manipulating dates later than December 31, 1999. The issue is complex and wide ranging. The problem may affect transaction processing computer applications used by the Company for accounting, distribution, manufacturing, planning and communications. The problem may also affect embedded systems such as building security systems, machine controllers and production test equipment. Year 2000 problems with these systems may affect the ability or efficiency with which the Company can perform many significant functions, including but not limited to order processing and fulfillment, material planning, product assembly, product test, invoicing and financial reporting. While there can be no guarantee of unaffected operation, the completed implementation of the Company's new Management Information System, and the completed assessment of its embedded systems indicates limited exposure in these areas. The Year 2000 problem may also affect the computer systems of the Company's suppliers and customers, potentially disrupting their operations. Year 2000 problems with the Company's business partners may impact the Company's sources of supply and demand. YEAR 2000 READINESS. The Company has a Year 2000 Risk Management program to assess the impact of the Year 2000 issue on the Company, and to coordinate remediation activities. The Company completed the evaluation of its products for Year 2000 compliance in the third quarter of 1998. The Company's FlashDisk, FlashDrive, Flash ChipSet, CompactFlash, MultiMediaCard, and ImageMate product lines do not perform date related processing and do not contain real time clock circuitry and, therefore, are Year 2000 ready. The Company's storage and connectivity products are used as components in a variety of host systems. The firmware, operating system and application software of these host systems are designed and manufactured by others. The Company makes no claim with regard to the Year 2000 readiness of host systems designed by others in which the Company's products are used. Independent system designers make derivative works from the SanDisk Host Developer's Toolkit ("Toolkit") source code product. Sample date related subroutines and data structures are included in the Toolkit for use by system designers. Designers modify the sample routines in order to fit the specific requirements of their host operating system. The designer is responsible for the formatting and processing logic associated with the date values that pass through the Toolkit subsystem and for the Year 2000 readiness of the systems in which the Toolkit is used. The Company makes no claims with regard to the Year 2000 readiness of host firmware and operating systems designed by others that contain derivative works of the Toolkit. The Year 2000 remediation of the Company's transaction processing systems was completed with the installation and testing of the Company's new management information system in the fourth quarter of 1998. The new system is a commercially available, fully integrated MRP II (Materials Requirement Planning and Accounting system) software application. This system is used for accounting, order processing, planning, inventory control, shop floor control and distribution. In the second quarter of 1999, the Company completed all of the primary elements of its Year 2000 assessment and remediation program for mission critical hardware and software. Tests of software applications, which have been identified by their vendors as Year 2000 Compliant, and several minor software upgrades will be completed in the third quarter of 1999. Well over 90% of the Company's investment in desktop PC hardware is known to be Year 2000 compliant, and proven remediation solutions have been implemented for the remaining 10%. The majority of the software used on these systems and network servers are recent versions of vendor supported, commercially available products. Upgrading these applications as Year 2000 compliant patches are released by the respective vendors has not been a significant burden on the Company and is expected to be completed before the end of 1999. The Company's assessment and remediation of Year 2000 problems in computer systems used for facilities control, machine control and manufacturing testing is complete. The most significant Year 2000 issue in this area has been found to be related to older wafer test equipment. This equipment is not expected to be in use in the year 2000. The Company is phasing in new Year 2000 compliant wafer test equipment in conjunction with the introduction of new generations of flash memory. Page 12 The Company's assessment of Year 2000 risks related to material suppliers, customers and other third parties is substantially complete. Inquiries were made of all critical suppliers and an assessment of their Year 2000 readiness was the basis for strategic decisions regarding alternate material sourcing and/or increasing inventory safety stocks. The survey of the Company's service suppliers is on-going, as many of these suppliers have third or fourth quarter 1999 target compliance dates for their Year 2000 programs. SanDisk is also contacting its significant customers regarding their Year 2000 readiness in order to understand the potential for any disruptions in their ordering patterns. Completion of these reviews will depend on the responsiveness of the Company's vendors and customers, over which the Company has no control. YEAR 2000 RISK MANAGEMENT PROGRAM COSTS. The cost of the Year 2000 project related to upgrading the Company's core management information system was approximately $1.0 million, $400,000 of which was related to the purchase of software and hardware which was capitalized by the Company. In the first half of 1999, the Company spent approximately $175,000 for application software upgrades and computer hardware. The Company estimates that costs to upgrade or replace any remaining software applications and non-compliant computer hardware will not be material to the Company's operating results. The Company would have incurred the majority of these costs, in spite of Year 2000 issues, due to the need to upgrade its management information system, application software and personal computers to support the Company's growth. The Company's Year 2000 remediation projects were funded from operating cash flows. No material projects were deferred in order to complete the Company's Year 2000 assessment and remediation project. The additional expenses related to the management of the Year 2000 compliance program and completing the remaining assessment of the Company's internal and external risks are not expected to be material to the Company's quarterly operating results. The costs and time schedule for the Year 2000 problem abatement are based on management's best estimates for the remediation of Year 2000 problems uncovered to date. These estimates were derived utilizing numerous assumptions, including that the most significant Year 2000 risks have already been identified, that certain resources will continue to be available, that third party plans will be fulfilled and other factors. However, there can be no guarantee that these estimates will be achieved or that the anticipated time schedule will be met and actual results could differ materially from those anticipated. CONTINGENCY PLANS. Specific contingency plans for systems that pose significant risk to on-going operations are being developed under the auspices of the Company's Year 2000 Risk Management program. Should previously undetected Year 2000 problems be found in other systems, these systems will either be upgraded, replaced, turned off, or operated in place with manual procedures to compensate for their deficiencies. While the Company believes that these alternative plans would be adequate to meet the Company's needs without materially impacting its operations, there can be no assurance that such alternatives would be successful or that the Company's results of operations would not be materially adversely affected by the delays and inefficiencies inherent in conducting operations in this manner. RISKS RELATED TO YEAR 2000 READINESS. Success of the Company's Year 2000 compliance effort depends, in part, on the success of its key suppliers and customers in dealing with their Year 2000 issues. The Company does not have any control over the remediation efforts of its key suppliers and customers and cannot fully determine the extent to which they have resolved their Year 2000 compliance issues. The Company currently purchases several critical components from single or sole source vendors. While this issue is being carefully managed, disruptions in the supply of components from any of these sole source suppliers due to Year 2000 issues, could cause delays in the Company's fulfillment of customer orders which could result in reduced or lost revenues. Furthermore, the Company's sales have historically been to a limited number of customers. Any disruption in the purchasing patterns of these customers or potential customers due to Year 2000 issues could cause a decline in the Company's revenues. There can be no assurance that the Company and its key suppliers and customers will identify and remediate all significant Year 2000 problems on a timely basis. Furthermore, there can be no assurance that the Company's insurance will cover losses from business interruptions arising from Year 2000 problems of the Company or Page 13 its suppliers. Year 2000 compliance problems of the Company's key suppliers and customers could adversely affect the Company's, business, financial condition and results of operations. The foregoing statements regarding the Company's Year 2000 readiness are based upon management's best estimates at the present time, which were derived utilizing assumptions regarding future events, including the continued availability of certain resources, third party modification plans and other factors. There can be no guarantee that these estimates will be achieved and actual results could differ materially from those anticipated. Specific factors that might cause such material differences include, but are not limited to, the availability and cost of personnel trained in this area, the ability to locate and correct all relevant computer codes, the nature and amount of programming required to upgrade or replace each of the affected programs, the rate and magnitude of related labor and consulting costs and the success of the Company's external customers and suppliers in addressing the Year 2000 issue. The Company's evaluation is on-going and it expects that new and different information will become available to it as the evaluation continues. Consequently, there is no guarantee that all material elements will be Year 2000 ready in time. Results of Operations PRODUCT REVENUES. SanDisk's product revenues were $42.3 million in the second quarter of 1999, up $18.8 million or 80% from the second quarter of 1998. Product revenues for the six months ended June 30, 1999 were $78.2 million, up $29.3 million or 60% from the same period in 1998. During the three and six month periods ended June 30, 1999, units shipped increased 168% and 156%, respectively from the same periods in 1998. The largest increase in both periods came from sales of CompactFlash which represented 56% and 58% of product revenues, respectively, for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 1999. Average selling prices declined 32% in the second quarter of 1999 and 38% for the first six months of 1999 compared to the same periods of the prior year. The mix of products sold varies from quarter to quarter and may vary in the future, affecting the Company's overall average selling prices and gross margins. The Company continues to experience limited bookings visibility as customers continue to expect short lead-times, particularly in the growing retail component of the Company's business. A majority of the Company's anticipated third quarter revenues are expected to be turns business with orders received and fulfilled in the same quarter. Due to a number of factors described herein and in "Factors That May Affect Future Results," the Company's ability to adjust its operating expenses is limited in the short term. As a result, if product revenues are lower than anticipated, the Company's results of operations will be adversely affected. Export sales represented 43% and 42%, respectively, of product revenue for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 1999 compared to 46% for the same periods of the previous year. The Company expects international sales to continue to represent a significant portion of its product revenues. In the second quarter of 1999, the Company's top ten customers represented approximately 57% of product revenue with the top two customers representing a combined 27% of product revenues. Sales to the top 10 customers represented approximately 64% of product revenues in the second quarter of 1998. The Company expects that sales to a limited number of customers will continue to represent a substantial portion of its revenues for the foreseeable future. LICENSE AND ROYALTY REVENUES. The Company currently earns patent license fees and royalties under several cross-license agreements. License and royalty revenues from patent cross-license agreements were $10.2 million in the second quarter of 1999, up from $7.9 million in the same period of the previous year due primarily to the timing of royalties earned under the various agreements. In the first six months of 1999, revenue from patent license and royalties was $18.5 million, up from $16.6 million in the same period of the prior year. Revenues from licenses and royalties decreased to 20% of total revenues in the second quarter of 1999 from 25% in the second quarter of 1998. Page 14 GROSS PROFITS. In the second quarter of 1999, gross profits were $21.7 million, or 41% of total revenues compared to $10.8 million, or 34% of total revenues in the same period of 1998. Product gross margins increased to 27% of product revenues in the second quarter of 1999 from 12% in the second quarter of 1998. In the second quarter of 1998, product gross margins were unusually low due to a steep decline in average selling prices and a lower of cost or market inventory write down. Gross profits for the first half of 1999 were $39.3 million compared to $27.1 million for the same period of the previous year. Gross margin was 41% of total revenues for the six month periods ended June 30, 1999 and 1998. Competition remains strong and product gross margins are expected to remain under pressure due to declining average selling prices. The Company is currently working on a number of cost reduction programs to strengthen product gross margins in 1999, including the transition of manufacturing operations for high volume products offshore which began in the second quarter. However, there can be no assurance that the Company will be successful in these efforts. Also, increased competition may negatively affect gross margins in the second half of 1999. During the second quarter of 1999, the Company began shipping CompactFlash and FlashDisk products utilizing its new 128Mbit flash chip. The 128Mbit flash chip has a lower manufacturing cost per megabyte and is expected to contribute to improved product gross margins in the second half of 1999. The initial production period of each new generation of flash technology is subject to many risks and uncertainties as described in "Factors That May Affect Future Results - - We Face Risk in Transitioning to New Processes and Products." There can be no assurance that the Company will successfully complete the customer qualifications of the 128Mbit flash chips in a timely manner, or that it will realize the expected cost reductions in the second half of 1999. In addition, in the second quarter of 1999, the Company moved the high volume production of its CompactFlash cards to Celestica in South China and the production of its MultiMediaCard products to Siliconware Precision Industries Co. Ltd. and Siliconware Corporation in Taiwan. These subcontractors now assemble and test a majority of the Company's CompactFlash and MultiMediaCard products. There are many risk and uncertainties involved with the transfer of production to these subcontractors as discussed in "Factors That May Affect Future Results - We Face Risks Associated with Our International Operations and - -- We Depend on Our Suppliers and Third Party Subcontractors." RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT. Research and development expenses consist principally of salaries and payroll related expenses for design and development engineers, prototype supplies and contract services. Research and development expenses were $6.0 million in the second quarter of 1999, up $1.5 million or 34% from $4.5 million in the same period of 1998. In the first half of 1999, research and development expenses increased to $11.2 million up $2.4 million or 27% from $8.8 million in the same period of 1998. The increases were primarily due to increased salary and related expenses and higher nonrecurring engineering and project related expenses. Research and development expenses represented 11% of total revenues in the second quarter of 1999 compared to 14% in the second quarter of 1998. The Company expects research and development expenses to continue to increase in absolute dollars to support the development and introduction of new generations of flash data storage products. SALES AND MARKETING. Sales and marketing expenses include salaries, sales commissions, benefits and travel expenses for the Company's sales, marketing, customer service and applications engineering personnel. These expenses also include other selling and marketing expenses, such as independent manufacturer's representative commissions, advertising and tradeshow expenses. Sales and marketing expenses were $5.8 million in the second quarter of 1999 up $1.5 million or 35% from $4.2 million in the second quarter of 1998. In the first half of 1999, sales and marketing expenses were $10.9 million, up $2.7 million or 33% from the same period of 1998. The increases were primarily due to increased salary and related expenses and higher commission expenses due to increased product revenues. Sales and marketing expenses represented approximately 11% of total revenues in the second quarter of 1999 compared to 14% in the second quarter of 1998. The Company expects sales and marketing expenses to increase as sales of its products grow and as it continues to develop the retail channel for its products. Page 15 GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE. General and administrative expenses include the cost of the Company's finance, information systems, human resources, shareholder relations, legal and administrative functions. General and administrative expenses were $2.9 million in the second quarter of 1999, up $1.2 million or 69% from $1.7 million in the second quarter of 1998. In the first half of 1999, general and administrative expenses were $5.3 million, up $1.5 million or 41% from the same period in 1998. The increases were primarily due to increased salary and related expenses, an increase in the allowance for doubtful accounts and higher consulting expenses. General and administrative expenses represented 6% of total revenues in the second quarter of 1999 compared to 5% for the second quarter of 1998. The Company expects general and administrative expenses to increase as the general and administrative functions grow to support the overall growth of the Company. General and administrative expenses could also increase substantially in the future if the Company continues to pursue litigation to defend its patent portfolio. See "Factors That May Affect Future Results - Risks Associated with Patents, Proprietary Rights and Related Litigation." INTEREST AND OTHER INCOME, NET. Interest and other income, net, was $1.5 million in the second quarter of 1999 compared to $1.3 million in the second quarter of 1998. In 1998, other income was lower due to the recognition of a loss on fixed asset disposal and foreign exchange losses. PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES. The Company recorded a provision for income taxes at a 33% effective tax rate for the first six months of 1999 compared to a 36% effective tax rate for the same period of 1998. The lower effective tax rate in 1999 reflects greater benefits from federal and state tax credits. Liquidity and Capital Resources As of June 30, 1999, the Company had working capital of $145.5 million, which included $12.8 million in cash and cash equivalents and $132.2 million in short-term investments. Operating activities provided $17.1 million of cash in the first six months of 1999 primarily from net income and an increase in current liabilities of $17.7 million, which were partially offset by increases in accounts receivable of $8.8 million and inventory of $8.4 million. Net cash used in investing activities of $22.5 million in the first six months of 1999 consisted of net purchases of investments of $13.9 million and capital equipment purchases and leasehold improvements of $8.6 million. In the first six months of 1999, cash provided by financing activities of $2.8 million came primarily from the sale of common stock through the Company's stock option and employee stock purchase plans. Depending on the future demand for the Company's products, the Company may decide to make additional investments, which could be substantial, in assembly and test manufacturing equipment or foundry capacity to support its business in the future. Impact of Currency Exchange Rates A portion of the Company's revenues are denominated in Japanese Yen. The Company enters into foreign exchange forward contracts to hedge against changes in foreign currency exchange rates. At June 30, 1999, forward contracts with a notional amount of $11.9 million were outstanding. Future exchange rate fluctuations could have a material adverse effect on the Company's business, financial condition and results of operations. Factors That May Affect Future Results - -------------------------------------- OUR OPERATING RESULTS MAY FLUCTUATE SIGNIFICANTLY WHICH MAY ADVERSELY AFFECT OUR STOCK PRICE. Our quarterly and annual operating results have fluctuated significantly in the past and we expect that they will continue to fluctuate in the future. This fluctuation is a result of a variety of factors, including the following: Page 16 o unpredictable demand for our products; o decline in the average selling prices of our products due to competitive pricing pressures; o seasonality in sales of our products; o adverse changes in product and customer mix; o slower than anticipated market acceptance of new or enhanced versions of our products; o competing flash memory card standards which displace the standards used in our products; o changes in our distribution channels; o timing of license and royalty revenue recognition; o fluctuations in product costs, particularly due to fluctuations in manufacturing yields and utilization; o availability of sufficient silicon wafer foundry capacity to meet customer demand; o significant yield losses which could affect our ability to fulfill customer orders and could increase our costs; o lengthening in manufacturing cycle times due to our suppliers operating at peak capacity; o increased research and development expenses; o exchange rate fluctuations, particularly the U.S. dollar to Japanese yen exchange rate; o changes in general economic conditions, in particular the economic recession in Japan; o difficulty of forecasting and management of inventory levels; and o expenses related to obsolescence of unsold inventory. DIFFICULTY OF ESTIMATING SILICON WAFER NEEDS When we order silicon wafers from our foundries, we have to estimate the number of silicon wafers needed to fill product orders several months into the future. If we overestimate this number, we will build excess inventories which would harm our gross margins and operating results. For example, in the second quarter of 1998, our product gross margins declined to 12% from 30% in the previous quarter due in part to a write down of inventory to reflect net realizable value. If we underestimate the number of silicon wafers needed to fill product orders, we may be unable to obtain an adequate supply of wafers which could harm our product revenues. Because our largest volume product, Compact Flash, is sold into an emerging consumer market, it is very difficult to accurately forecast future sales. A substantial majority of our quarterly sales are from orders received and fulfilled in the same quarter. In addition, our product order backlog may fluctuate substantially from quarter to quarter. ANTICIPATED GROWTH IN EXPENSE LEVELS Due to anticipated growth, we increased our expense levels in the first half of 1999. We expect operating expenses to continue to increase as a result of the need to hire additional personnel to support expected growth in sales unit volumes, sales and marketing efforts and research and development activities. Page 17 In addition, we have significant fixed costs. We cannot readily reduce these expenses over the short term. If revenues do not increase proportionately to operating expenses, or if revenues decrease or do not meet expectations for a particular period, our business, financial condition and results of operations will be harmed. VARIABILITY OF AVERAGE SELLING PRICES AND GROSS MARGIN Our product mix varies quarterly, which affects our overall average selling prices and gross margins. Our CompactFlash products, which currently represent the majority of our product revenues, have lower average selling prices and gross margins than our higher capacity FlashDisk and FlashDrive products. We believe that sales of CompactFlash products may become an even more significant percentage of our product revenues as consumer applications, such as digital cameras, become more popular. Dependence on CompactFlash sales, together with lower pricing caused by increased competition, caused average unit selling prices to decline 28% during fiscal 1998, and 38% in the first half of 1999 compared to the same period in 1998. We expect this trend to continue. VARIABILITY OF LICENSE FEES AND ROYALTIES Our intellectual property strategy is to cross-license our patents to other manufacturers of flash products. Under these arrangements, we earn license fees and royalties on individually negotiated terms. The timing of revenue recognition from these payments is dependent on the terms of each contract and on the timing of product shipments by the third parties. This may cause license and royalty revenues to fluctuate significantly from quarter to quarter. Because these revenues have higher gross margins than product revenues, gross margins and net income fluctuate significantly with changes in license and royalty revenues. IN TRANSITIONING TO NEW PROCESSES AND PRODUCTS WE FACE PRODUCTION AND MARKET ACCEPTANCE RISKS. GENERAL Successive generations of our products have incorporated semiconductor devices with greater memory capacity per chip. Two important factors that enable us to decrease the costs per megabyte of our flash data storage products are the development of higher capacity semiconductor devices and the implementation of smaller geometry manufacturing processes. A number of challenges exist in achieving a lower cost per megabyte, including: o overcoming lower yields often experienced in the early production of new semiconductor devices; o problems with design and manufacturing of products that will incorporate these devices; and o production delays. Because our products are complex, we periodically experience significant delays in the development and volume production ramp up of our products. Similar delays could occur in the future and could harm our business, financial condition and results of operations. 128 MEGABIT TECHNOLOGY We began shipments of 128 megabit products in the second quarter of 1999. In the third quarter of 1999, we plan to increase production of our 128 megabit flash memory technology, which has a lower cost per megabyte than our 64 megabit technology currently in production and will allow us to begin shipping products with increased capacities including the 32 megabyte MultiMediaCard. If we are unable to bring our 128 megabit flash memory into full production as quickly as planned or if we experience unplanned Page 18 yield problems, we may be unable to meet our customers' demand for high capacity MultiMediaCard and CompactFlash products which could result in lost sales and reduced revenues. In addition, our gross margins may be harmed by any problems we encounter in the production of our 128 megabit flash memory. D2 FLASH TECHNOLOGY We have developed new products based on D2 flash technology, a new flash architecture designed to store two bits in each flash memory cell. High density flash memory, such as D2 flash, is a complex technology that requires strict manufacturing controls and effective test screens. Problems from the shift to volume production for new flash products could impact both reliability and yields and result in increased manufacturing costs and reduced availability. We may not be able to manufacture reliable and cost effective D2 flash products in commercial volumes and with yields sufficient to result in lower costs per megabyte. Furthermore, D2 flash technology needs significantly improved write speed so that it can be usefully applied to market applications such as digital cameras. It is possible that we may not be able to achieve the targeted write speed for our 256 megabit product. In the fourth quarter of 1999, we expect to increase production of our 256 megabit flash memory technology, which has a lower cost per megabyte than the 128 megabit technology. If we are unable to bring our 256 megabit flash memory into full production as quickly as planned or if we experience unplanned yield problems, we will not be able to meet our customers' forecasted demand in the fourth quarter of 1999 and beyond, which would result in lost sales, reduced revenues and reduced margins. In the second half of 1999, we will be dependent for the majority of megabytes shipped on the successful volume shipments of cards built with our 128 megabit and 256 megabit new designs. If we are unable to successfully achieve the planned yields for these designs, we will be unable to meet our forecasted customer needs, and consequently our revenues and profits may fall significantly below our expectations. MULTIMEDIACARD PRODUCTS We expect to increase the MultiMediaCard product family production volumes during the second half of 1999. This product presents new challenges in assembly and testing. During the startup phase, we have experienced fluctuations in yields which have reduced MultiMediaCard product availability, increased manufacturing costs and reduced product margins for this product family. We are currently unable to meet customer demand for MultiMediaCard products. This is primarily due to demand exceeding previous forecasts from our customers. Although we are steadily resolving the assembly manufacturing issues, we have not yet achieved the production assembly yields necessary for high volume production. WE DEPEND ON THIRD PARTY FOUNDRIES FOR SILICON WAFERS. All of our products require silicon wafers. We rely on United Silicon Corporation, or USC, and United Semiconductor Incorporated, or USIC, in Taiwan to supply all of our silicon wafers. We depend on these foundries to allocate a portion of their capacity to our needs, produce acceptable quality wafers with acceptable manufacturing yields and deliver our wafers on a timely basis at a competitive price. If these foundries are unable to satisfy these requirements, our business, financial condition and operating results may suffer. Currently, demand for semiconductor wafers has increased significantly, due to increased demand in the consumer electronics and cellular phone markets. Increased demand for advanced technology silicon wafers is increasing the price of these wafers as supply becomes constrained. We expect this trend to continue throughout 1999 and 2000 which could adversely impact the rate of growth of our business, either through reduced supply, higher wafer prices or a combination of the two. USC and USIC are subsidiaries of United Microelectronics Corporation, or UMC. We currently own 10% of USIC, have the right to appoint one of its directors and are entitled to 12.5% of its total wafer production. In the second quarter of 1999, UMC announced plans to merge the USC and USIC foundries Page 19 into the UMC parent company. When the merger is complete, which is currently expected to occur in late 1999 or early 2000, we will receive UMC shares in exchange for the USIC shares we currently own. However, we will not have a seat on the board of directors of the combined company. We have received assurances from the senior management of UMC that it intends to continue to supply us the same wafer capacity at the prices we currently enjoy under our agreement with USIC. However, there can be no assurance that we will be able to maintain our current wafer capacity and competitive pricing arrangement in our future supply negotiations with UMC. Under the wafer supply agreements with our foundries, we are obligated to provide monthly rolling forecasts for our anticipated wafer purchases. Generally, the estimates for the first three months of each forecast are binding commitments. The estimates for the remaining months may only be changed by a certain percentage from the previous month's forecast. This limits our ability to react to fluctuations in demand for our products. For example, if customer demand falls below our forecast and we are unable to reschedule or cancel our wafer orders, we may end up with excess wafer inventories, which could result in higher operating expenses and reduced gross margins. Conversely, if customer demand exceeds our forecasts, we may be unable to obtain an adequate supply of wafers to fill customer orders, which could result in lost sales and lower revenues. In addition, if we are unable to obtain scheduled quantities of wafers with acceptable price and yields from any foundry, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be harmed. THE SUCCESS OF OUR BUSINESS DEPENDS ON EMERGING MARKETS AND NEW PRODUCTS. In order for demand for our products to grow, the markets for new products that use CompactFlash and the MultiMediaCard, such as MP3 portable music players and smart phones, must develop and grow. If sales of these products do not grow, our revenues and profit margins could level off or decline. Because we sell our products for use in many new applications, it is difficult to forecast demand. For example, in the second quarter of 1999, demand for our 32 megabyte capacity MultiMediaCard for use in MP3 portable digital music players grew faster than anticipated and we were unable to fill all customer orders during the quarter. Although we are increasing production of the MultiMediaCard, if we are unable to fulfill customer demand for these products in the future, we may lose sales to our competitors. In addition, the market for MP3 portable digital music players is very new and it is uncertain how quickly consumer demand for these players will grow. If this market does not grow as quickly as anticipated or our customers are not successful in selling their MP3 portable music players to consumers, our revenues could be adversely affected. In addition, it is often the case with new consumer markets that after an initial period of new market formation and initial acceptance by early adopters, the market enters a period of slow growth as standards emerge and infrastructure develops. In the event that this occurs in the MP3 music market or other emerging markets, sales of our products would be harmed. The success of this new product strategy will depend upon, among other things, the following: o our ability to successfully develop new products with higher memory capacities and enhanced features at a lower cost per megabyte; o the development of new applications or markets for our flash data storage products; o the extent to which prospective customers design our products into their products and successfully introduce their products; and o the extent to which our products or technologies become obsolete or noncompetitive due to products or technologies developed by others. If we fail to do any of the above, our business, financial condition and results of operations could suffer. Page 20 WE MAY BE UNABLE TO MAINTAIN MARKET SHARE We may be unable to increase our production volumes at a sufficiently rapid rate so as to maintain our market share. Ultimately our growth rate depends on our ability to obtain sufficient flash memory wafers to meet demand. If we are unable to do so, in a timely manner, we may lose market share to our competitors. OUR INTERNATIONAL OPERATIONS MAKE US VULNERABLE TO CHANGING CONDITIONS AND CURRENCY FLUCTUATIONS. POLITICAL RISKS Currently, all of our flash memory wafers are produced by two foundries in Taiwan. We also use a third-party subcontractor in Taiwan for the assembly and testing of our MultiMediaCard products. We may therefore be affected by the political, economic and military conditions in Taiwan. Taiwan is currently engaged in various political disputes with China and both countries have recently conducted military exercises in or near the other's territorial waters and airspace. The Taiwanese and Chinese governments may continue to escalate these disputes, resulting in an economic embargo, a disruption in shipping routes or even military hostilities. This could harm our business by interrupting or delaying the production or shipment of flash memory wafers or MultiMediaCard products by our Taiwanese foundries and subcontractor. See also "--We depend on our suppliers and third party subcontractors." In addition, in the second quarter of 1999, we began using a third-party subcontractor in China for the assembly and testing of our CompactFlash products. As a result, our business could be harmed by the effect of political, economic, legal and other uncertainties in China. Under its current leadership, the Chinese government has been pursuing economic reform policies, including the encouragement of foreign trade and investment and greater economic decentralization. The Chinese government may not continue to pursue these policies and, even if it does continue, these policies may not be successful. The Chinese government may also significantly alter these policies from time to time. In addition, China does not currently have a comprehensive and highly developed legal system, particularly with respect to the protection of intellectual property rights. As a result, enforcement of existing and future laws and contracts is uncertain, and the implementation and interpretation of such laws may be inconsistent. Such inconsistency could lead to piracy and degradation of our intellectual property protection. ECONOMIC RISKS We price our products primarily in U.S. dollars. As a result, if the value of the U.S. dollar increases relative to foreign currencies, our products could become less competitive in international markets. For example, our products are relatively more expensive in Asia because of the weakness of many Asian currencies relative to the US dollar. In addition, we currently invoice some of our customers in Japanese yen. Therefore, fluctuations in the Japanese yen against the U.S. dollar could harm our business, financial condition and results of operations. Our sales are also highly dependent upon global economic conditions. In fiscal 1998, sales to Japan declined to 31.6% of total product sales from 38.1% in 1997. In the first half of 1999, sales to Japan represented 25.6% of product revenue compared to 32.7% for the same period of 1998. We believe these declines were primarily due to the Japanese economic crisis and market recession. If the current market conditions in Japan do not improve, or if they decline further, our results of operations may suffer. GENERAL RISKS Our international business activities could also be limited or disrupted by any of the following factors: o the need to comply with foreign government regulation; Page 21 o general geopolitical risks such as political and economic instability, potential hostilities and changes in diplomatic and trade relationships; o imposition of regulatory requirements, tariffs, import and export restrictions and other barriers and restrictions; o longer payment cycles and greater difficulty in accounts receivable collection; o potentially adverse tax consequences; o less protection of our intellectual property rights; and o delays in product shipments due to local customs restrictions. WE DEPEND ON OUR SUPPLIERS AND THIRD PARTY SUBCONTRACTORS. We rely on our vendors, some of which are sole source suppliers, for several of our critical components. We do not have long-term supply agreements with some of these vendors. Our business, financial condition and operating results could be harmed by delays or reductions in shipments if we are unable to develop alternative sources or obtain sufficient quantities of these components. For example, we rely on USIC and USC for all of our flash memory wafers and Motorola, Inc. and NEC to supply certain designs of microcontrollers. Due to industry-wide increasing demand for semiconductors, we have recently experienced resistance to price reductions from some of our important suppliers. We also rely on third-party subcontractors to assemble and test the memory components for our products. We have no long-term contracts with these subcontractors and cannot directly control product delivery schedules. This could lead to product shortages or quality assurance problems which could increase the manufacturing costs of our products and have adverse effects on our operating results. During the second quarter of 1999, we transferred a substantial portion of wafer testing, packaged memory final testing, card assembly and card testing to Silicon Precision Industries Co., Ltd. in Taiwan and Celestica, Inc. in China. In the third quarter of 1999, we will transfer additional production to these subcontractors, and by the end of the year we expect that they will be assembling and testing a majority of our mature, high-volume products. This increased reliance on subcontractors is expected to reduce manufacturing costs and give us access to increased production capacity. During the transition period, we will continue full operations at our Sunnyvale production facility while simultaneously transferring testing equipment and training personnel of our subcontractors. However, we do not have sufficient duplicative production testing equipment at Sunnyvale and at our subcontractors. Therefore, any significant problems in this complex transfer of operations may result in a disruption of production and a shortage of product to meet customer demand in the second half of 1999 and beyond. CONTINUING DECLINES IN OUR AVERAGE SALES PRICES MAY RESULT IN DECLINES IN OUR GROSS MARGINS. In 1998, the average unit selling prices of our products declined 28% compared to 1997. In the first half of 1999, the average unit selling prices of our products declined 38% compared to the same period of 1998. Because flash data storage markets are characterized by intense competition and price reductions for our products are necessary to meet consumer price points, we expect that market-driven pricing pressures will continue. This will likely result in a further decline in average sales prices for our products. We believe that we can offset declining average sales prices by achieving manufacturing cost reductions and developing new products that incorporate more advanced technology and include more advanced features and can be sold at stable average gross margins despite continued declines in average selling price per megabyte. However, if we are unable to achieve such cost reductions and technological advances, this could result in lost sales and declining gross margins, and as a result, our business, financial condition Page 22 and results of operations could suffer. The semiconductor industry is cyclical and we believe it is currently in a recovery from one of its most severe down cycles. During most of 1997 and 1998, the semiconductor industry experienced significant production over capacity, which reduced margins for substantially all flash memory suppliers. OUR MARKETS ARE HIGHLY COMPETITIVE. FLASH MEMORY MANUFACTURERS AND MEMORY CARD ASSEMBLERS We compete in an industry characterized by intense competition, rapid technological changes, evolving industry standards, declining average selling prices and rapid product obsolescence. Our competitors include many large domestic and international companies that have greater access to advanced wafer foundry capacity, substantially greater financial, technical, marketing and other resources, broader product lines and longer standing relationships with customers. Our primary competitors include: o storage flash chip producers, such as Hitachi Ltd., Samsung Electronics Company Ltd. and Toshiba Corporation; o socket flash, linear flash and component manufacturers, such as Advanced Micro Devices, Inc., Atmel Corporation, Intel Corporation, Macronix International Co., Ltd., Micron Technology, Inc., Mitsubishi Electronic Corporation, Sharp Electronics Corporation and STMicroelectronics NV; and o module or card assemblers, such as Lexar Media, Inc., M-Systems, Inc., Pretec Electronics Corp., Simple Technology Inc., SMART Modular Technologies, Inc., Sony Corporation, Kingston Technology Company, Panasonic Consumer Electronic Company, Silicon Storage Technology, Inc., TDK Corporation, Matsushita Battery, Inc. and Viking Components, Inc., who combine controllers and flash memory chips developed by others into flash storage cards. In addition, over 25 companies have been certified by the CompactFlash Association to manufacture and sell their own brand of CompactFlash. We believe additional manufacturers will enter the CompactFlash market in the future. We have entered into patent cross-license agreements with several of our leading competitors including, Hitachi, Samsung, Toshiba, Intel and Sharp. Under these agreements, each party may manufacture and sell products that incorporate technology covered by the other party's patents related to flash memory devices. As we continue to license our patents to certain competitors, competition will increase and may harm our business, financial condition and results of operations. ALTERNATIVE STORAGE MEDIA Competing products have been introduced that promote industry standards that are different from our CompactFlash and MultiMediaCard products, including Toshiba's SmartMedia, Sony Corporation's Memory Stick, Sony's standard floppy disk used for digital storage in its Mavica digital cameras, Panasonic's Mega Storage cards, Iomega's Clik drive, a miniaturized, mechanical, removable disk drive and M-Systems' Diskonchip for embedded storage applications. Each competing standard is mechanically and electronically incompatible with CompactFlash and MultiMediaCard. If a manufacturer of digital cameras or other consumer electronic devices designs in one of these alternative competing standards, CompactFlash or MultiMediaCard will be eliminated from use in that product. In September 1998, IBM introduced the microdrive, a rotating disk drive in a Type II CompactFlash format. Initially, this product will compete directly with our Type II CompactFlash memory cards, which we introduced in the second quarter of 1999, for use in high-end professional digital cameras. Page 23 In October 1998, M-Systems introduced their Diskonchip 2000 Millennium product which competes against our Flash ChipSet products in embedded storage applications such as set top boxes and networking appliances. According to independent industry analysts, Sony's Mavica digital camera captured a considerable portion of the United States market for digital cameras in 1998. The Mavica uses a standard floppy disk to store digital images and therefore uses no CompactFlash, or any other flash cards. Our sales prospects for CompactFlash cards have been adversely impacted by the success of the Mavica. Our MultiMediaCard products also have faced significant competition from Toshiba's SmartMedia flash cards and we expect to face similarly significant competition from Sony's Memory Stick. Although the Memory Stick is proprietary to Sony, if it is adopted and achieves widespread use in future products, sales of our MultiMediaCard and CompactFlash products may decline. ALTERNATIVE FLASH TECHNOLOGIES We also face competition from products based on multilevel cell flash technology such as Intel's 64 megabit and 128 megabit StrataFlash chips and Hitachi's 256 megabit multilevel cell flash chip. These products compete with our D2 multilevel cell flash technology. Multilevel cell flash is a technological innovation that allows each flash memory cell to store two bits of information instead of the traditional single bit stored by the industry standard flash technology. In the second quarter of 1999, Intel announced their new 128Mbit multilevel cell chip and Hitachi began shipping customer samples of CompactFlash cards employing their new multilevel cell flash chip. In addition, Toshiba has begun customer shipments of 32 megabyte SmartMedia cards employing their new 256Mbit flash chip. Although Toshiba has not incorporated multilevel cell flash technology in their 256Mbit flash chip, their use of more advanced lithographic design rules has resulted in a comparably-sized die and may allow them to achieve a more competitive cost structure than that of our 256Mbit D2 flash chip. Furthermore, we expect to face competition from existing competitors and from other companies that may enter our existing or future markets that have similar or alternative data storage solutions which may be less costly or provide additional features. Price is an important competitive factor in the market for consumer products. Increased price competition could lower gross margins if our average selling prices decrease faster than our costs and could also result in lost sales. OUR BUSINESS DEPENDS UPON CONSUMER PRODUCTS. In 1998 and the first half of 1999, we received more product revenue and shipped more units of products destined for consumer electronics applications, principally digital cameras, than for any other application. We believe that these products will encounter intense competition and be more price sensitive than products sold into our other target markets. In addition, we must spend more on marketing and promotion in consumer markets to establish brand name recognition and preference. A significant portion of sales to the consumer electronics market is made through distributors and to retailers. Sales through these channels typically include rights to return unsold inventory. As a result, we do not recognize revenue until after the product has been sold to the end user. If our distributors and retailers are not successful in this market, there could be substantial product returns, which would harm our business, financial condition and results of operations. SALES TO A SMALL NUMBER OF CUSTOMERS REPRESENT A SIGNIFICANT PORTION OF OUR REVENUES. More than half of our revenues come from a small number of customers. For example, sales to our top 10 customers accounted for approximately 59%, 67%, and 71%, respectively, of our product revenues for 1998, 1997, and 1996. In the first six months of 1999, our top 10 customers represented approximately 57% of product revenues. In the first six months of fiscal 1999 and in fiscal year 1998, two customers each accounted for 10% or more of our product sales. If we were to lose any of these customers or experience Page 24 any material reduction in orders from these customers, our revenues and operating results would suffer. Our sales are generally made by standard purchase orders rather than long-term contracts. In addition, the composition of our major customer base changes from year to year as the market demand for our customers' products change. OUR MULTIPLE SALES CHANNELS MAY COMPETE FOR A LIMITED NUMBER OF CUSTOMER SALES. Web based sales of our products today represent a small but growing portion of our overall sales. Sales on the Internet tend to undercut the traditional distribution channels and may dramatically change the way our consumer products are purchased in future years. We cannot assure you that we will successfully manage the inherent channel conflicts between our retail channel customers and customers that wish to purchase directly on the Internet. THERE IS SEASONALITY IN OUR BUSINESS. Sales of our products, in particular the sale of CompactFlash products, in the consumer electronics applications market are subject to seasonality. As a result, product sales are impacted by seasonal purchasing patterns with higher sales generally occurring in the second half of each year. In addition, in the past we have experienced a decrease in orders in the first quarter from our Japanese OEM customers primarily because most customers in Japan operate on a fiscal year ending in March and prefer to delay purchases until the beginning of their next fiscal year. For example, our product revenues were 24% lower in the first quarter of 1998 than in the fourth quarter of 1997, mostly due to these seasonal factors and the Asian economic crisis. Although we did not experience this seasonality in the first quarter of 1999, we cannot assure you that we will not experience seasonality in the future. WE MUST ACHIEVE ACCEPTABLE WAFER MANUFACTURING YIELDS. The fabrication of our products requires wafers to be produced in a highly controlled and ultra clean environment. Semiconductor companies that supply our wafers sometimes have experienced problems achieving acceptable wafer manufacturing yields. Semiconductor manufacturing yields are a function of both our design technology and the foundry's manufacturing process technology. Low yields may result from design errors or manufacturing failures. Yield problems may not be determined or improved until an actual product is made and can be tested. As a result, yield problems may not be identified until the wafers are well into the production process. The risks associated with yields are even greater because we rely on independent offshore foundries for our wafers which increases the effort and time required to identify, communicate and resolve manufacturing yield problems. If the foundries cannot achieve the planned yields, this will result in higher costs and reduced product availability, and could harm our business, financial condition and results of operations. RISKS ASSOCIATED WITH PATENTS, PROPRIETARY RIGHTS AND RELATED LITIGATION. GENERAL We rely on a combination of patents, trademarks, copyright and trade secret laws, confidentiality procedures and licensing arrangements to protect our intellectual property rights. In the past, we have been involved in significant disputes regarding our intellectual property rights and claims that we may be infringing third parties' intellectual property rights. We expect that we may be involved in similar disputes in the future. We cannot assure you that: o any of our existing patents will not be invalidated; o patents will be issued for any of our pending applications; o any claims allowed from existing or pending patents will have sufficient scope or strength; or Page 25 o our patents will be issued in the primary countries where our products are sold in order to protect our rights and potential commercial advantage. In addition, our competitors may be able to design their products around our patents. We intend to vigorously enforce our patents but we cannot be sure that our efforts will be successful. If we were to have an adverse result in any litigation, we could be required to pay substantial damages, cease the manufacture, use and sale of infringing products, expend significant resources to develop non-infringing technology, discontinue the use of certain processes or obtain licenses to the infringing technology. Any litigation is likely to result in significant expense to us, as well as divert the efforts of our technical and management personnel. For example the Lexar litigation described below has resulted in cumulative litigation expenses approaching $1 million. CROSS LICENSES AND INDEMNIFICATION OBLIGATIONS If we decide to incorporate third party technology into our products or if we are found to infringe on others' intellectual property, we could be required to license intellectual property from a third party. We may also need to license some of our intellectual property to others in order to enable us to obtain cross-licenses to third party patents. Currently, we have patent cross-license agreements with several companies, including Hitachi, Intel, Samsung, Sharp and Toshiba and we are in discussions with other companies regarding potential cross-license agreements. We cannot be certain that licenses will be offered when we need them, or that the terms offered will be acceptable. If we do obtain licenses from third parties, we may be required to pay license fees or royalty payments. In addition, if we are unable to obtain a license that is necessary to the manufacture of our products, we could be required to suspend the manufacture of products or stop our wafer suppliers from using processes that may infringe the rights of third parties. We cannot assure you that we would be successful in redesigning our products or that the necessary licenses will be available under reasonable terms. We have historically agreed to indemnify various suppliers and customers for alleged patent infringement. The scope of such indemnity varies, but may, in some instances, include indemnification for damages and expenses, including attorney's fees. We may periodically engage in litigation as a result of these indemnification obligations. We are not currently engaged in any such indemnification proceedings. Our insurance policies exclude coverage for third party claims for patent infringement. Any future obligation to indemnify our customers or suppliers could harm our business, financial condition or results of operations. LITIGATION RISKS ASSOCIATED WITH OUR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY From time to time, it may be necessary to initiate litigation against third parties to preserve our intellectual property rights. These parties could in turn bring suit against us. For example, in March 1998 we filed a complaint in Federal District Court against Lexar Media, Inc. for infringement of one of our flash card patents. Lexar disputed this claim and asserted that our patent was invalid or unenforceable, as well as asserting various counterclaims including unfair competition, violation of the Lanham Act, patent misuse, interference with prospective economic advantage, trade defamation and fraud. We have denied all of these counterclaims. In July 1998, the federal district court denied Lexar's request to have the case dismissed. Discovery in this suit began in August 1998. On February 22, 1999, the Federal District Court considered arguments and papers submitted by the parties regarding the scope and proper interpretation of the asserted claims in our patent at issue in the Lexar suit. On March 4, 1999, the Federal District Court issued its ruling on the proper construction of the claim terms in our patent. On July 30, 1999, we filed a motion for partial summary judgment that Lexar CompactFlash and PC Cards contributorily infringe our patent. This motion is scheduled to be heard in September 1999. In August 1999, we had a mandatory settlement meeting with Lexar. No settlement was reached through this meeting. A trial date has not yet been set. Page 27 OUR RAPID GROWTH MAY STRAIN OUR OPERATIONS. We are currently experiencing rapid growth, which has placed, and continues to place, a significant strain on our personnel and other resources. To accommodate this growth, we must continue to hire, train, motivate and manage our employees. We are having difficulty hiring the necessary engineering, sales and marketing personnel to support our growth. In addition, we must make a significant investment in our existing internal information management systems to support increased manufacturing, as well as accounting and other management related functions. Our systems, procedures and controls may not be adequate to support our rapid growth, which could in turn harm our business, financial condition and results of operations. OUR SUCCESS DEPENDS ON KEY PERSONNEL, INCLUDING OUR EXECUTIVE OFFICERS, THE LOSS OF WHOM COULD DISRUPT OUR BUSINESS. Our success greatly depends on the continued contributions of our senior management and other key research and development, sales, marketing and operations personnel, including Dr. Eli Harari, our founder, President and Chief Executive Officer. Our success will also depend on our ability to recruit additional highly skilled personnel. We cannot assure you that we will be successful in hiring or retaining such key personnel, or that any of our key personnel will remain employed with us. OUR STOCK PRICE HAS BEEN, AND MAY CONTINUE TO BE, VOLATILE. The market price of our stock has fluctuated significantly in the past and is likely to continue to fluctuate in the future. For example for the twelve month period ending June 30, 1999, our stock price has fluctuated from a low of $5.125 to a high of $44.6875. We believe that such fluctuations will continue as a result of future announcements concerning us, our competitors or principal customers regarding technological innovations, new product introductions, governmental regulations, litigation or changes in earnings estimates by analysts. In addition, in recent years the stock market has experienced significant price and volume fluctuations and the market prices of the securities of high technology companies have been especially volatile, often for reasons outside the control of the particular companies. These fluctuations as well as general economic, political and market conditions may have an adverse affect on the market price of our common stock. YEAR 2000 ISSUES MAY HARM OUR BUSINESS. Many existing computer systems and applications may not function properly when using dates beyond December 31, 1999. We have established a Year 2000 Risk Management program to assess the impact that the Year 2000 issue may have on our business. Based on our assessment to date, all of our flash memory and connectivity products are Year 2000 compliant. Other Year 2000 issues that we face include assessment and remediation of the computer systems used for facilities control, machine control and manufacturing testing and Year 2000 compliance of our key suppliers and customers. Our estimated total costs for Year 2000 compliance issues are not expected to have a material adverse affect on our business. However, the failure of our key suppliers and customers to take proper remedial efforts could harm our business, financial condition and results of operations. ANTI-TAKEOVER PROVISIONS IN OUR CHARTER DOCUMENTS, STOCKHOLDER RIGHTS PLAN AND IN DELAWARE LAW COULD PREVENT OR DELAY A CHANGE IN CONTROL AND, AS A RESULT, NEGATIVELY IMPACT OUR STOCKHOLDERS. We have taken a number of actions that could have the effect of discouraging a takeover attempt. For example, we have adopted a stockholder rights plan that would cause substantial dilution to a stockholder who attempts to acquire us on terms not approved by our board of directors. In addition, our certificate of incorporation grants the board of directors the authority to fix the rights, preferences and privileges of and issue up to 4,000,000 shares of preferred stock without stockholder action. Although we have no present intention to issue shares of preferred stock, such an issuance could have the effect of Page 27 making it more difficult and less attractive for a third party to acquire a majority of our outstanding voting stock. Preferred stock may also have other rights, including economic rights senior to the common stock that could have a material adverse effect on the market value of the common stock. In addition, we are subject to the anti-takeover provisions of Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law. This section provides that a corporation shall not engage in any business combination with any interested stockholder during the three-year period following the time that such stockholder becomes an interested stockholder. This provision could have the effect of delaying or preventing a change of control of SanDisk. Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk Please refer to the Company's form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 1998. Page 28 PART II. OTHER INFORMATION Item 1. Legal Proceedings The information required by this item is set forth in Note 6 of the Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements on pages 7 and 8 and under "Factors That May Affect Future Results - Risks Associated with Patents, Proprietary Rights and Related Litigation" on pages 25 and 26 of this Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 1999, and is incorporated herein by reference. Item 2. Changes in Securities None Item 3. Defaults upon Senior Securities None Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders At the Company's Annual Meeting of Stockholders held on May 12, 1999, the following individuals were elected to the Board of Directors: Votes For Votes Withheld ---------- -------------- William V. Campbell 25,591,230 127,559 Irwin Federman 25,591,030 127,759 Catherine P. Lego 25,591,230 127,559 Eli Harari 25,591,230 127,559 James D. Meindl 25,591,230 127,559 Thomas F. Mulvaney 25,591,230 127,559 Alan F. Shugart 25,591,230 127,559 The following proposals were approved at the Company's Annual Meeting:
Affirmative Negative Votes Broker Votes Votes Withheld Non-Votes --------------- ------------- -------------- ----------------- Amendment to the 1995 Stock 11,078,236 10,604,999 33,140 4,002,414 Option Plan Amendments to the 1995 13,562,790 8,114,752 38,833 4,002,414 Non-Employee Directors Stock Option Plan Amendment to the 1995 21,366,072 317,873 32,430 4,002,414 Employee Stock Purchase Plan Ratify the appointment of 25,626,898 85,736 6,155 0 Ernst & Young LLP as independent auditors for the fiscal year ending December 31, 1999.
Item 5. Other Information None Page 29 Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K A. Exhibits Exhibit Number Exhibit Title 3.1 Certificate of Incorporation of the Registrant, as amended to date.2 3.2 Form of Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Registrant.2 3.3 Bylaws of the Registrant, as amended.2 3.4 Form of Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Registrant 2 3.5 Certificate of Designation for the Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock, as filed with the Delaware Secretary of State on April 24, 1997.4 4.1 Reference is made to Exhibits 3.1, 3.2, 3.3 and 3.4.2 4.3 Amended and Restated Registration Rights Agreement, among the Registrant and the investors and founders named therein, dated March 3, 1995.2 4.5 Series F Preferred Stock Purchase Agreement between Seagate Technology, Inc. and the Registrant, dated January 15, 1993.2 4.8 Rights Agreement, dated as of April 18, 1997, between the Company and Harris Trust and Savings Bank.4 4.9 First Amendment to Rights Agreement dated October 22, 1999, between Harris Trust and the Registrant.11 9.1 Amended and Restated Voting Agreement, among the Registrant and the investors named therein, dated March 3, 1995.2 10.10 License Agreement between the Registrant and Dr. Eli Harari, dated September 6, 1988.2 10.13 1989 Stock Benefit Plan.2 10.14 1995 Stock Option Plan.2 10.15 Employee Stock Purchase Plan.2 10.16 1995 Non-Employee Directors Stock Option Plan.2 10.18 Lease Agreement between the Registrant and G.F. Properties, dated March 1, 1996.3 10.21 Amendment to Lease Agreement between the Registrant and G.F. Properties, dated April 3, 1997.5 10.23 Foundry Venture Agreement between the Registrant and United Microelectronics Corporation, dated June 27, 1997.1, 6 10.24 Written Assurances Re: Foundry Venture Agreement between the Registrant and United Microelectronics Corporation, dated September 13, 1995.1, 6 10.25 Side Letter between Registrant and United Microelectronics Corporation, dated May 28, 1997.1, 6 10.27 Clarification letter with regards to Foundry Venture Agreement between the Registrant and United Microelectronics Corporation dated October 24, 1997.7 10.28 Lease Agreement between the Registrant and G.F. Properties, dated June 10, 1998.8 10.29 Trade Finance Agreement between the Registrant and Union Bank of California, dated July 15, 1998.9 10.30 1995 Stock Option Plan Amended and Restated as of December 17, 1998.12 10.31 1995 Non-Employee Directors Stock Option Plan Amended and Restated as of December 17, 1998.12 10.32 1995 Employee Stock Purchase Plan Amended and Restated as of December 17, 1998.12 21.1 Subsidiaries of the Registrant.10 23.1 Consent of Ernst & Young, LLP, Independent Auditors. 10 27.1 Financial Data Schedule for the quarter ended June 30, 1999. (In EDGAR format only) - ---------- 1. Confidential treatment granted as to certain portions of these exhibits. 2. Previously filed as an Exhibit to the Registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-1 (No. 33-96298). 3. Previously filed as an Exhibit to the Registrant's 1995 Annual Report on Form 10-K. Page 30 4. Previously filed as an Exhibit to the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K/A dated April 18, 1997. 5. Previously filed as an Exhibit to the Registrant's Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 1997. 6. Previously filed as an Exhibit to the Registrant's Current Report on form 8-K dated October 16, 1997. 7. Previously filed as an Exhibit to the Registrant's Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 1997. 8. Previously filed as an Exhibit to the Registrant's Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 1998. 9. Previously filed as an Exhibit to the Registrant's Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 1998. 10. Previously filed as an Exhibit to the Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K. 11. Previously filed as an Exhibit to the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K dated January 1, 1999. 12. Previously filed as an Exhibit to the Registrant's Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 1999. B. Reports on Form 8-K No reports on form 8-K were filed during the quarter ended June 30, 1999. Page 31 SIGNATURES Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized. SanDisk Corporation (Registrant) By:/s/ Cindy L. Burgdorf --------------------- Cindy L. Burgdorf Chief Financial Officer, Senior Vice President, Finance and Administration and Secretary (On behalf of the Registrant and as Principal Financial Officer.) DATED: August 24, 1999 Page 30 EX-27 2 FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE
5 SanDisk Financial Data Schedule, June 30, 1999 0001000180 SanDisk Corporation 1,000 3-mos Dec-31-1999 Jun-30-1999 12,766 132,182 29,213 0 17,332 211,093 22,410 0 285,505 65,634 0 0 0 188,938 0 285,505 42,300 52,549 30,858 0 14,658 0 0 8,498 2,804 5,694 0 0 0 5,694 0.21 0.19
-----END PRIVACY-ENHANCED MESSAGE-----