Filed Pursuant to Rule 424(b)(5)
Registration No. 333-204844

Prospectus

ALLY AUTO RECEIVABLES TRUST 2018-1

Issuing Entity (CIK: 0001727820)

$1,057,070,000 Asset Backed Notes, Class A

$23,520,000 Asset Backed Notes, Class B

ALLY AUTO ASSETS LLC

Depositor (CIK: 0001477336)

ALLY BANK                            

Sponsor and Servicer (CIK: 0001601846)

You should consider carefully the risk factors beginning on page 7 in this prospectus. The notes represent obligations of the issuing entity only. The notes do not represent obligations of or interests in, and are not guaranteed by, Ally Auto Assets LLC, Ally Bank or any of their affiliates. Neither the notes nor the receivables are insured or guaranteed by any governmental entity.	The issuing entity is issuing the following classes of notes:
		Class A-1 Notes(1)	Class A-2 Notes(1)	Class A-3 Notes(1)	Class A-4 Notes(1)	Class B Notes(1)
	Principal Balance	$283,000,000	$340,000,000	$340,000,000	$94,070,000	$23,520,000
	Offered Amount	$268,850,000	$323,000,000	$323,000,000	$89,360,000	$22,340,000
	Interest Rate	1.75000%	2.14%	2.35%	2.53%	2.66%
	Initial Distribution Date	February 15, 2018	February 15, 2018	February 15, 2018	February 15, 2018	February 15, 2018
	Final Scheduled Distribution Date	February 15, 2019	September 15, 2020	June 15, 2022	February 15, 2023	May 15, 2023
	Distribution Frequency	Monthly	Monthly	Monthly	Monthly	Monthly
	Price to Public	100.00000%	99.99355%	99.98844%	99.98226%	99.98957%
	Underwriting Discount	0.050%	0.200%	0.250%	0.300%	0.400%
	Proceeds to the Depositor	99.95000%	99.79355%	99.73844%	99.68226%	99.58957%
	(1)   Approximately 5% (by initial principal balance) of each of the Class A-1 Notes, the Class A-2 Notes, the Class A-3 Notes, the Class A-4 Notes and the Class B Notes will be retained by the depositor or another majority-owned affiliate of the sponsor. The interest rate for each class of notes will be a fixed rate. The aggregate principal amount of the notes being offered under this prospectus is $1,026,550,000. The primary assets of the issuing entity will be a pool of fixed rate retail instalment sale contracts and direct purchase money loans used to finance the purchase of new and used cars and light trucks.

Credit Enhancement and Liquidity

• Reserve account, with an initial deposit of $2,799,433.58.

• Overcollateralization in the initial amount of $5,023,433.38.

• Class B Asset Backed Notes, with a principal balance of $23,520,000.

• Class C Asset Backed Notes, with a principal balance of $19,600,000.

• Class D Asset Backed Notes, with a principal balance of $14,560,000.

• The Class C Notes and the Class D Notes are not being offered under this prospectus and instead will be retained initially by the depositor or its affiliate or, to the extent not required to be retained, sold in private placements.

• The Class D Notes are subordinated to the Class A Notes, the Class B Notes and the Class C Notes.

• The Class C Notes are subordinated to the Class A Notes and the Class B Notes.

• The Class B Notes are subordinated to the Class A Notes.

Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission nor any state securities commission has approved or disapproved these notes or determined if this prospectus is truthful or complete. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal offense.

Barclays	Deutsche Bank Securities	J.P. Morgan
Lloyds Securities	Scotiabank	Wells Fargo Securities

The date of this prospectus is January 23, 2018.

IMPORTANT NOTICE ABOUT INFORMATION

PRESENTED IN THIS PROSPECTUS

You should rely only on the information provided in this prospectus and any pricing supplement hereto, including the information incorporated by reference in this prospectus. We have not authorized anyone to provide you with other or different information. We are not offering the notes in any state where the offer is not permitted.

This prospectus provides information regarding the pool of receivables held by the issuing entity and the terms of your notes.

You can find definitions of the capitalized terms used in this prospectus in the “Glossary of Terms to this Prospectus,” which appears at the end of this prospectus.

The term “Ally Bank,” when used in connection with Ally Bank’s capacity as acquirer of the receivables, seller of the receivables to the depositor or servicer of the receivables, includes any successors or assigns of Ally Bank in such capacity permitted pursuant to the transaction documents.

Ally Auto Assets LLC has met the registration requirements of General Instruction I.A.1 of Form SF-3 by filing no later than the date of the filing of the final prospectus, and determining that each of its affiliated depositors and issuing entities have timely filed, or have cured by filing at least 90 days prior to the date hereof:

• the CEO certification described in “The Depositor—CEO Certification”; and

• the transaction documents containing the provisions described in “The Receivables Pool—Asset Representations Review,” “The Receivables Pool—Dispute Resolution” and “Reports to Securityholders—Investor Communications.”

FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS

Whenever we use words like “intends,” “anticipates” or “expects” or similar words in this prospectus, we are making a forward-looking statement, or a projection of what we think will happen in the future. Forward-looking statements are inherently subject to a variety of circumstances, many of which are beyond our control and could cause actual results to differ materially from what we anticipate. Any forward-looking statements in this prospectus speak only as of the date of this prospectus. We do not assume any responsibility to update or review any forward-looking statement contained in this prospectus to reflect any change in our expectation about the subject of that forward-looking statement or to reflect any change in events, conditions or circumstances on which we have based any forward-looking statement, except as required by federal securities laws.

i

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Prospectus

FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS	i
SUMMARY	1
RISK FACTORS	7
SUMMARY OF TRANSACTION PARTIES*	19
SUMMARY OF MONTHLY DEPOSITS TO AND WITHDRAWALS FROM ACCOUNTS*	20
THE SPONSOR	21
ACQUISITION AND UNDERWRITING	22
Acquisition and Underwriting	22
Underwriting Exceptions	23
Subvention	24
THE SERVICER	24
SERVICING PROCEDURES	25
Collections	27
Servicing Compensation and Payment of Expenses	28
THE TRUST	28
Capitalization of the Trust	29
THE RECEIVABLES POOL	30
Criteria Applicable to the Selection of Receivables	30
Composition of the Receivables Pool—(Total: New and Used)	32
Composition of the Receivables Pool—(New)	32
Composition of the Receivables Pool—(Used)	32
Distribution of the Receivables Pool by Annual Percentage Rate—Aggregate	33
Distribution of the Receivables Pool by State	33
Distribution of the Receivables Pool by Loan-to-Value Ratio	34
Distribution of the Receivables Pool by FICO Score	34
Distribution of the Receivables Pool by Original Term	34
Distribution of the Receivables Pool by Vehicle Make	35
Distribution of the Receivables Pool by Vehicle Model	35
Depositor Review of the Receivables Pool	35
Exceptions to Underwriting Guidelines	37
Asset Representations Review	38
Dispute Resolution	42
REPURCHASE HISTORY	43
ASSET-LEVEL DATA FOR THE RECEIVABLES	44
THE SPONSOR’S PORTFOLIO DATA	45
Delinquencies, Repossessions, Bankruptcies and Net Losses	45
STATIC POOL INFORMATION	47
WEIGHTED AVERAGE LIFE OF THE OFFERED NOTES	48
Percent of Initial Note Principal Balance Outstanding at Various ABS Percentages	51
THE NOTES	56
Distributions	56
Payments of Interest	58
Payments of Principal	59
Redemption	60
Controlling Class	60
The Indenture	60

ii

CREDIT RISK RETENTION	67
BOOK-ENTRY REGISTRATION	67
Book-Entry Registration	67
Definitive Notes	68
REPORTS TO SECURITYHOLDERS	69
Reports to Securityholders	69
Investor Communications	71
POOL FACTORS AND TRADING INFORMATION	71
THE CERTIFICATES	71
THE TRANSFER AGREEMENTS AND THE SERVICING AGREEMENTS	72
Sale and Assignment of Receivables	72
Servicer Advances	76
Accounts	76
Net Deposits	77
Evidence as to Compliance	77
Changes to Servicer; Servicer Indemnification and Proceedings	78
Servicer Default	78
Rights upon Servicer Default	79
Waiver of Past Defaults	79
Amendment	79
Distribution of Assets Following Payment in Full of the Notes	80
Insolvency Event	80
Certificateholder Liability; Indemnification	81
Termination	81
Administration Agreement	81
Custodian Agreement	82
Credit Enhancement	82
Investment of Funds	82
USE OF PROCEEDS	83
CERTAIN FEES AND EXPENSES	83
Other Fees and Expenses	84
MONEY MARKET INVESTMENTS	84
LEGAL ASPECTS OF THE RECEIVABLES	84
Security Interest in Vehicles	84
Repossession	86
Notice of Sale; Redemption Rights	86
Deficiency Judgments and Excess Proceeds	86
Consumer Protection Laws	87
Other Limitations	87
Transfer of Vehicles	88
INSOLVENCY ASPECTS OF THE OFFERINGS	88
Potentially Applicable Insolvency Regimes	88
Consequences of Insolvency Regimes for Payments on the Notes	88
Bankruptcy of the Trust	90
Measures to Avoid Insolvency Proceedings With Respect to Special Purpose Entities	90
FDIC Rule	91
THE DEPOSITOR	92
CEO Certification	93
THE INDENTURE TRUSTEE	93
THE OWNER TRUSTEE	96

iii

ASSET REPRESENTATIONS REVIEWER	97
LEGAL PROCEEDINGS	98
AFFILIATIONS AND RELATIONSHIPS AMONG TRANSACTION PARTIES	98
CONSIDERATIONS FOR ERISA AND OTHER U.S. EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS	99
General	99
Plan Assets Regulation	101
FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSEQUENCES	102
Qualifications on Opinion of Tax Counsel	102
The Notes	103
Tax Shelter Disclosure and Investor List Requirements	106
STATE AND LOCAL TAX CONSEQUENCES	106
PLAN OF DISTRIBUTION	107
Aggregate Principal Amount to be Purchased	108
Matters Relating to the Offering of the Notes in Europe	109
LEGAL OPINIONS	110
WHERE YOU CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION	110
INCORPORATION BY REFERENCE	111
GLOSSARY OF TERMS TO THIS PROSPECTUS	111

iv

SUMMARY

This summary highlights selected information from this prospectus and does not contain all of the information that you need to consider in making your investment decision. To understand the material terms of this offering of the offered notes, carefully read this entire prospectus.

THE PARTIES

Sponsor

Ally Bank.

Issuing Entity

Ally Auto Receivables Trust 2018-1 will be the issuing entity of the notes and the certificates. In this prospectus, we also refer to the issuing entity as the “trust.”

Depositor

Ally Auto Assets LLC will be the depositor to the issuing entity.

Servicers

Ally Bank, or “Ally Bank,” will be the servicer and Ally Servicing LLC, or “Ally Servicing,” will be the sub-servicer providing collection and administrative servicing for the servicer and Ally Financial Inc., or “Ally Financial,” will also provide services for the servicer. For a description of the services provided by Ally Bank, Ally Servicing LLC and Ally Financial, see “The Servicer” and “Servicing Procedures” in this prospectus.

Indenture Trustee

Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas.

Owner Trustee

BNY Mellon Trust of Delaware.

Asset Representations Reviewer

Clayton Fixed Income Services LLC.

Interest Payments

• The interest rate for each class of notes will be a fixed rate.

THE NOTES

The issuing entity will issue the classes of notes listed on the cover page of this prospectus. Certain of the notes will be available for purchase in denominations of $1,000 and integral multiples thereof, and will be available in book-entry form only. We sometimes refer to these notes, other than the notes to be retained by the depositor or another majority-owned affiliate of the sponsor, as the “offered notes.”

The “record date” for any distribution date will be the close of business on the date immediately preceding the distribution date, or if definitive notes are issued, the last day of the preceding monthly period.

The final scheduled distribution dates of the offered notes are listed on the cover page of this prospectus.

Approximately 5% (by initial principal balance) of each of the Class A-1 Notes, the Class A-2 Notes, the Class A-3 Notes, the Class A-4 Notes, the Class B Notes, the Class C Notes, the Class D Notes and the certificates (collectively, the “EVI”) will be retained by the depositor or another majority-owned affiliate of the sponsor. See “Credit Risk Retention” in this prospectus.

The issuing entity will also issue Class C Notes with an initial principal balance of $19,600,000 and Class D Notes with an initial principal balance of $14,560,000. The Class C Notes will have a final scheduled distribution date of August 15, 2023. The Class D Notes will have a final scheduled distribution date of October 15, 2024. The Class C Notes and the Class D Notes are not being offered under this prospectus. The Class C Notes and the Class D Notes (other than the EVI) will be sold in one or more private placements or retained initially by the depositor or its affiliate. The depositor or its affiliate will retain the right to sell at any time all or a portion of such retained notes to the extent that it is not required to retain such notes.

• Interest will accrue on the notes from and including the closing date to but excluding the first distribution date and for each monthly period thereafter, as set forth below.

1

• The issuing entity will pay interest on the notes on the fifteenth day of each calendar month, or if that day is not a business day, the next business day, beginning on February 15, 2018. We refer to these dates as “distribution dates.”

• The issuing entity will pay interest on the notes, other than the Class A-1 Notes, on each distribution date based on a 360-day year consisting of twelve 30-day months. The issuing entity will pay interest on the Class A-1 Notes on each distribution date based on the actual days elapsed during the period for which interest is payable and a 360-day year.

• Interest payments on all classes of the Class A Notes will have the same priority.

• The payment of interest on the Class B Notes is subordinated to the payment of interest on, and, in limited circumstances, payments of principal of, the Class A Notes, the payment of interest on the Class C Notes is subordinated to the payment of interest on, and, in limited circumstances, payments of principal of, the Class A Notes and the Class B Notes, and the payment of interest on the Class D Notes is subordinated to the payment of interest on, and, in limited circumstances, payments of principal of, the Class A Notes, the Class B Notes and the Class C Notes, in each case to the extent described in “Priority of Distributions.” In general, no interest will be paid on the Class B Notes on any distribution date until all interest due and payable on the Class A Notes has been paid in full, no interest will be paid on the Class C Notes on any distribution date until all interest due and payable on the Class A Notes and the Class B Notes has been paid in full, and no interest will be paid on the Class D Notes on any distribution date until all interest due and payable on the Class A Notes, the Class B Notes and the Class C Notes has been paid in full.

Principal Payments

• The issuing entity will pay principal on the notes monthly on each distribution date.

• The issuing entity will make principal payments on the notes based on the amount of collections and defaults on the receivables during the prior month.

• On each distribution date, except as described below under “Priority of Distributions—

Acceleration,” the amounts available to make principal payments on the notes will be applied as follows:

(1) to the Class A-1 Notes, until the Class A-1 Notes are paid in full,

(2) to the Class A-2 Notes, until the Class A-2 Notes are paid in full,

(3) to the Class A-3 Notes, until the Class A-3 Notes are paid in full,

(4) to the Class A-4 Notes, until the Class A-4 Notes are paid in full,

(5) to the Class B Notes, until the Class B Notes are paid in full,

(6) to the Class C Notes, until the Class C Notes are paid in full, and

(7) to the Class D Notes, until the Class D Notes are paid in full.

• The failure of the issuing entity to pay any class of notes in full on or before its final scheduled distribution date will constitute an event of default.

THE CERTIFICATES

On the closing date, the issuing entity will issue certificates. Five percent of the certificates will be initially retained by the depositor or a majority-owned affiliate of the sponsor and are not being offered under this prospectus. The depositor or an affiliate of the depositor will retain the remaining 95% of the certificates. The depositor or its affiliate will retain the right to sell all or a portion of the certificates at any time other than 5% of such certificates for so long as described in “Credit Risk Retention” in this prospectus.

THE RECEIVABLES

Property of the Issuing Entity

The primary assets of the issuing entity will be a pool of fixed rate retail motor vehicle instalment sale contracts and direct purchase money loans used to finance the purchase of new and used cars and light trucks. We refer to the persons who financed their purchases with these contracts and loans as “obligors.” A portion of the contracts and loans sold

2

to the issuing entity on the closing date were acquired or originated by Ally Bank under special incentive rate financing programs, and we refer to those contracts and loans as “subvented receivables.” We refer to the remaining contracts and loans that are not subvented receivables and are sold to the issuing entity on the closing date as “non-subvented receivables.” We use the term “receivables” to mean both subvented receivables and non-subvented receivables. Further, when we use the term “remaining payments” on receivables as of a specific date, we mean all scheduled payments that have not been received prior to that specified date.

The receivables in the issuing entity will be sold on the closing date by Ally Bank to the depositor, and then by the depositor to the issuing entity. The issuing entity will grant a security interest in the receivables and the other property of the issuing entity to the indenture trustee on behalf of the noteholders. Ally Bank, as seller or as servicer, or the depositor may be required to repurchase receivables from the issuing entity in specified circumstances, as detailed in this prospectus under “The Transfer Agreements and the Servicing Agreements—Sale and Assignment of Receivables.”

The issuing entity’s property will, subject to other specific exceptions described in this prospectus, also include:

• the remaining payments on the receivables as of a cutoff date of January 1, 2018 and monies received with respect to those remaining payments; we refer to that date as the “cutoff date,”

• amounts held on deposit in trust accounts maintained for the issuing entity,

• security interests in the vehicles financed by the receivables,

• any recourse Ally Bank has against the dealers from which it purchased the receivables,

• any proceeds from claims on insurance policies covering the financed vehicles, and

• all rights of the issuing entity under the related transfer agreements with the depositor, including the rights of the depositor under the pooling agreement, the servicing agreement and the custodian agreement.

Receivables Principal Balance

The initial aggregate principal balance of all the receivables as of the cutoff date is $1,119,773,433.38, which represents the purchase price paid by the depositor to the sponsor for the receivables. We refer to this initial balance as the “initial aggregate receivables principal balance.” We refer to the aggregate principal balance of all receivables as the “aggregate receivables principal balance.”

As of the cutoff date, the receivables had the following characteristics:

Aggregate Amount Financed	$	1,119,773,433.38
Number of Contracts in Pool		69,471
Average Amount Financed	$	16,118.57
Weighted Average APR of all Receivables in Pool		5.88	%
Weighted Average FICO Score		737.09
Weighted Average Original Term (In Months)		66.13
Weighted Average Remaining Term (In Months)		52.68
Percentage of Contracts with Original Terms greater than 60 months		67.25	%
Percentage of New Vehicles		70.02	%

See “The Receivables Pool” in this prospectus for more information about the data set forth in the chart above.

A small number of receivables in the pool of receivables constitute exceptions to the underwriting criteria of Ally Bank, as described in “Acquisition and Underwriting—Underwriting Exceptions” in this prospectus. The depositor elected to include these receivables in the pool of receivables for this offering. These receivables were included in the pool on the basis that the depositor has historically securitized receivables with these characteristics and these exceptions are immaterial. The aggregate amount financed of these exception receivables is $21,583,171.96. See “The Receivables Pool—Exceptions to Underwriting Guidelines” in this prospectus for more information regarding these exceptions.

The depositor performed a review of the pool of receivables, including a review of the ongoing processes and procedures used by the sponsor and the servicer and a review of the underlying data and disclosure regarding the receivables. The depositor concluded that it has reasonable assurance that the

3

disclosure regarding the pool of receivables in this prospectus is accurate in all material respects. See “The Receivables Pool—Depositor Review of the Receivables Pool.”

Overcollateralization

The initial aggregate receivables principal balance will exceed the aggregate principal balance of the notes on the closing date by approximately 0.45% of the initial aggregate receivables principal balance. The application of funds as described in the twelfth priority of distributions is designed to increase over time the amount of overcollateralization as of any distribution date to a target amount, which we refer to as the “overcollateralization target amount.” The overcollateralization target amount will be 1.30% of the initial aggregate receivables principal balance.

PRIORITY OF DISTRIBUTIONS

The issuing entity will distribute available funds in the following order of priority:

• basic servicing fee payments to the servicer,

• to the asset representations reviewer, the fees, expenses and indemnities due and owing under the asset representations review agreement, and to the indenture trustee and the vote tabulation agent, any fees, costs and indemnities with respect to an asset representations review, each of which have not been previously paid in full, up to a maximum of $275,000 per year,

• interest on the Class A Notes, pro rata among the Class A Notes,

• principal on the notes in an amount equal to the excess, if any, of the aggregate principal balance of the Class A Notes over the aggregate receivables principal balance,

• interest on the Class B Notes,

• principal on the notes in an amount equal to the excess, if any, of the aggregate principal balance of the Class A Notes and the Class B Notes—reduced by the amount of principal allocated to the notes above—over the aggregate receivables principal balance,

• interest on the Class C Notes,

• principal on the notes in an amount equal to the excess, if any, of the aggregate principal balance of the Class A Notes, the Class B Notes and the Class C Notes—reduced by the amounts of principal allocated to the notes above—over the aggregate receivables principal balance,

• interest on the Class D Notes,

• principal on the notes in an amount equal to the excess, if any, of the aggregate principal balance of the Class A Notes, the Class B Notes, the Class C Notes and the Class D Notes—reduced by the amounts of principal allocated to the notes above—over the aggregate receivables principal balance,

• deposits into the reserve account, until the amount in the reserve account equals the specified reserve account balance,

• principal on the notes in an amount equal to the lesser of (a) the aggregate principal balance of the notes—reduced by the amounts of principal allocated to the notes above, and (b) the excess of the aggregate principal balance of the notes—reduced by the amounts of principal allocated to the notes above—over an amount equal to the aggregate receivables principal balance minus the overcollateralization target amount,

• to the indenture trustee, any costs of the indenture trustee incurred associated with a resignation of the servicer and the appointment of a successor servicer,

• to the owner trustee, the indenture trustee, the administrator and the asset representations reviewer, amounts due and owing under the trust agreement, the indenture, the servicing agreement, the administration agreement and the asset representations review agreement, which have not been previously paid in full, and

• any remaining amounts, to the certificateholders.

Acceleration

If an event of default occurs and the notes are accelerated, until the time when all events of default have been cured or waived as provided in the indenture, the issuing entity will pay interest and principal first on the Class A Notes. Interest will be paid pro rata among the classes of Class A Notes and principal will be paid sequentially by class starting

4

with the Class A-1 Notes. No interest or principal will be payable on the Class B Notes until all principal of and interest on the Class A Notes have been paid in full, no interest or principal will be payable on the Class C Notes until all principal of and interest on the Class A Notes and the Class B Notes have been paid in full, and no interest or principal will be payable on the Class D Notes until all principal of and interest on the Class A Notes, the Class B Notes and the Class C Notes have been paid in full.

RESERVE ACCOUNT

On the closing date, the depositor will cause the noteholders to deposit $2,799,433.58 in cash or eligible investments into the reserve account. Collections on the receivables, to the extent available for this purpose, will be added to the reserve account on each distribution date, until the amount in the reserve account equals the specified reserve account balance. For a description of the calculation of the specified reserve account balance, see “The Transfer Agreements and the Servicing Agreements—Credit Enhancement—Reserve Account” in this prospectus for additional information.

To the extent that funds from principal and interest collections on the receivables are not sufficient to pay the basic servicing fee and to pay the amounts that are prior to the deposits into the reserve account as described under “Priority of Distributions” above, the amount previously deposited in the reserve account provides an additional source of funds for those payments.

SERVICING FEES

The issuing entity will pay monthly to the servicer (a) a basic servicing fee equal to 1.00% per annum as compensation for servicing the receivables and (b) a supplemental servicing fee equal to any late fees, prepayment charges and other administrative fees and expenses collected during the month and investment earnings on the trust accounts.

REDEMPTION OF THE NOTES

When the aggregate receivables principal balance declines to 10% or less of the initial aggregate receivables principal balance, the servicer may purchase all of the remaining receivables. If the servicer purchases the receivables, the outstanding notes will be redeemed at a price equal to their remaining principal balance, plus accrued and unpaid interest thereon.

REPURCHASES AND PURCHASES OF RECEIVABLES

Unless otherwise cured, Ally Bank and the depositor will be required to repurchase any receivable with respect to which a breach of any representation or warranty of the depositor or Ally Bank has a material and adverse effect on the interests of the securityholders. For a description of such repurchase requirements, see “The Transfer Agreements and the Servicing Agreements—Sale and Assignment of Receivables.” If (1) the delinquency trigger is met or exceeded for a monthly period, (2) at least 5% of the noteholders by aggregate principal balance demand a vote of the noteholders to determine if an asset representations review should be performed and (3) at least a majority of the noteholders, measured by outstanding principal balance of the noteholders voting, vote to direct a review of delinquent receivables, as described under “The Receivables Pool—Asset Representations Review,” and at least 5% of the noteholders by aggregate principal balance of the notes outstanding cast a vote, the asset representations reviewer will review all 60 day or more delinquent receivables to determine if the representations and warranties were satisfied as of the closing date. For a description of the asset representations review process, see “The Receivables Pool—Asset Representations Review” in this prospectus.

TAX STATUS

Mayer Brown LLP, special tax counsel, has delivered its opinion that:

• the offered notes will be characterized as indebtedness for federal income tax purposes to the extent the notes are treated as beneficially owned by a person other than the sponsor or its affiliates for such purposes,

• the issuing entity will be classified as a grantor trust under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Internal Revenue Code”), and

• the issuing entity will not be taxable as an association or publicly traded partnership taxable as a corporation.

Each noteholder, by accepting an offered note (other than any notes that are retained by the depositor or one or more affiliates thereof), will agree to treat the offered notes as indebtedness for federal, state and local income and franchise tax purposes.

5

CONSIDERATIONS FOR ERISA AND OTHER U.S. EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS

Subject to the restrictions and considerations discussed under “Considerations for ERISA and Other U.S. Employee Benefit Plans” in this prospectus, the offered notes may be purchased by or for the account of (a) an “employee benefit plan” as defined in Section 3(3) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended (“ERISA”), that is subject to the provisions of Title I of ERISA, (b) a “plan” subject to Section 4975 of the Internal Revenue Code, or (c) any entity whose underlying assets include “plan assets” by reason of an employee benefit plan’s or a plan’s investment in the entity. We suggest that any of the foregoing types of entities consult with its counsel before purchasing the offered notes. See “Considerations for ERISA and Other U.S. Employee Benefit Plans” in this prospectus for additional information.

MONEY MARKET INVESTMENTS

The Class A-1 Notes will be structured to be “eligible securities” for purchase by money market funds under Rule 2a-7 under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “Investment Company Act”). Rule 2a-7 includes additional criteria for investments by money market funds, including requirements relating to portfolio maturity, liquidity and risk diversification. If you are a money market fund contemplating a purchase of Class A-1 Notes, you should consult your counsel before making a purchase.

RATINGS

We expect that the offered notes will receive credit ratings from at least two nationally recognized rating agencies hired by us.

The rating agencies have discretion to monitor and adjust the ratings on the offered notes. The offered notes may receive an unsolicited rating that is different from or lower than the ratings provided by the rating agencies hired to rate the offered notes. As of the date of this prospectus, we are not aware of any unsolicited ratings on the offered notes. A rating, change in rating or a withdrawal of a rating by one rating agency may not correspond to a rating, change in rating or withdrawal of a rating from any other rating agency. See “Risk Factors—The Ratings for the Notes Are Limited in Scope, May Be Unsolicited, May Not Continue to Be Issued and Do Not Consider the Suitability of the Notes for You” in this prospectus for more information.

CERTAIN INVESTMENT COMPANY ACT CONSIDERATIONS

The issuing entity is not registered or required to be registered as an “investment company” under the Investment Company Act. In determining that the issuing entity is not required to be registered as an investment company, the issuing entity is relying on the exemption provided by Rule 3a-7 under the Investment Company Act, although there may be additional exclusions or exemptions that the issuing entity could rely on as well. As of the closing date, the issuing entity will be structured so as not to constitute a “covered fund” for purposes of the regulations, commonly referred to as the “Volcker Rule,” adopted to implement Section 619 of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010, or the “Dodd-Frank Act.”

RISK FACTORS

Before making an investment decision, you should consider carefully the factors that are set forth in “Risk Factors” beginning on page 7 of this prospectus.

6

RISK FACTORS

You should consider the following risk factors in deciding whether to purchase the offered notes.

Principal and Interest Payments on the Notes Depend on Collections on the Receivables
The issuing entity’s ability to make principal and interest payments on the notes will depend on the amount of collections on the receivables, the amount of receivables that default and the amount on deposit in the reserve account. If there are decreased collections, increased defaults or insufficient funds in the reserve account, you may experience delays or reductions in payments on your notes.

Lack of First Priority Liens on Financed Vehicles or Receivables Could Make the Receivables Uncollectible and Reduce or Delay Payments on the Securities


If the security interests in the financed vehicles as described in “Legal Aspects of the Receivables—Security Interest in Vehicles” are not properly perfected, the interests of the depositor, the issuing entity and the indenture trustee in the financed vehicles would be subordinate to, among others, the following:

(1) bankruptcy trustee of the obligor,

(2) subsequent purchaser of the financed vehicle, and

(3) holder of a perfected security interest.

The issuing entity and the indenture trustee may not be able to collect on a defaulted receivable in the absence of a perfected security interest in a vehicle financed by the receivable. Even if the issuing entity and the indenture trustee were to have a perfected security interest in the financed vehicles, events could jeopardize the enforceability of that interest, such as:

(1) fraud or forgery by the vehicle owner,

(2) negligence or fraud by the servicer,

(3) mistakes by government agencies, and

(4) liens for repairs or unpaid taxes.

See “Legal Aspects of the Receivables—Security Interest in Vehicles” in this prospectus.

Financing statements will be filed in favor of the issuing entity, the depositor and the indenture trustee for each pool of receivables sold to the issuing entity. The financing statements will perfect the security interests of the depositor, the issuing entity and the indenture trustee in the pool of receivables. However, Ally Bank will serve as the custodian of the receivables and will not physically segregate or mark the receivable files to indicate that they have been sold to the depositor, sold by the depositor to the issuing entity or pledged by the issuing

7

entity to the indenture trustee. See “The Transfer Agreements and the Servicing Agreements—Sale and Assignment of Receivables” in this prospectus. Additionally, if Ally Bank does not retain physical possession of a tangible contract or “control” for the purposes of the Uniform Commercial Code with respect to contracts which are electronic contracts, then the issuing entity would not have a perfected security interest in such related contract. See “Legal Aspects of the Receivables—Security Interest in Vehicles” in this prospectus.

If another party purchases or perfects a first priority security interest in the receivables:

(1) for value,

(2) in the ordinary course of business, and

(3) without actual knowledge of the depositor’s, the issuing entity’s or the indenture trustee’s interest in the receivables,

then that purchaser or secured party will acquire an interest in the receivables that is senior to the issuing entity’s and the indenture trustee’s interest, and the collections on those receivables may not be available to make payments on your securities to the extent of such purchaser’s or secured party’s interest.

Longer Term Receivables May Increase the Frequency and Amount of Losses
The frequency and amount of losses may be greater for receivables with longer terms, because these receivables tend to have a somewhat greater frequency of delinquencies and defaults and because the slower rate of amortization of the principal balance of a longer term receivable may result in a longer period during which the value of the related financed vehicle is less than the remaining principal balance of such receivable. See “The Receivables Pool—Distribution of the Receivables Pool by Original Term” in this prospectus for the percentage of contracts with original terms of greater than 60 months.

Prepayments on and Repurchases of the Receivables Could Shorten the Average Life of the Securities

Obligors may prepay the receivables in full or in part at any time. In addition, the receivables may be prepaid as a result of defaults or from credit life, disability or physical damage insurance. Also, the seller, the servicer or the depositor may be required to repurchase or purchase, as applicable, receivables from the issuing entity in specified circumstances, as detailed in this prospectus under “The Transfer Agreements and the Servicing Agreements—Sale and Assignment of Receivables” and the servicer may have the right to purchase all remaining receivables from the issuing entity pursuant to its optional purchase right.

A prepayment, repurchase, purchase or liquidation of the receivables, including liquidation of defaulted receivables, could shorten the average life of the securities. A variety of unpredictable economic, social and other factors influence prepayment rates.

8

You will bear all reinvestment risk resulting from a faster or slower rate of prepayment, repurchase or extension of the receivables held by the issuing entity.

Ally Bank and the Depositor Have Limited Obligations to the Issuing Entity and They Will Not Make Payments on the Securities

Ally Bank, the depositor and their respective affiliates other than the issuing entity are generally not obligated to make any payments to you on your notes or the certificates and do not guarantee payments on the receivables or your notes or the certificates. However, Ally Bank, as seller, will make representations and warranties regarding the characteristics of the receivables and these representations and warranties will then be assigned to the issuing entity. If Ally Bank, as seller, breaches the representations and warranties, it may be required to repurchase the applicable receivables from the issuing entity. Also, if Ally Bank, as servicer, breaches any covenant that materially and adversely affects the noteholders, it may be required to purchase the related receivables. If the seller fails to repurchase, or the servicer fails to purchase, the applicable receivables as and when required, you might experience reductions or delays in payments on your securities. See “The Transfer Agreements and the Servicing Agreements—Sale and Assignment of Receivables” in this prospectus.

The Assets of the Issuing Entity Are Limited and Are the Only Source of Payment for the Securities

The issuing entity will not have any significant assets or sources of funds other than the receivables or its rights in the reserve account. The securities will only represent interests in or obligations of the issuing entity. The securities will not be insured or guaranteed by Ally Bank, the servicer, the depositor, the owner trustee, the indenture trustee, any of their respective affiliates or any governmental entity. You must rely primarily on payments on the receivables and on the reserve account for repayment of your securities. In addition, for defaulted receivables, you may have to look to the obligors on those receivables and the proceeds from the repossession and sale of financed vehicles which secure defaulted receivables. If these sources are insufficient, you may receive payments late or not receive back your full principal investment or all interest due to you. See “The Notes—Distributions,” “The Transfer Agreements and the Servicing Agreements—Credit Enhancement” and “Legal Aspects of the Receivables” in this prospectus.

Financial Market Disruptions and a Lack of Liquidity in the Secondary Market Could Adversely Affect the Market Value of Your Notes and/or Limit Your Ability to Resell Your Notes



The securities will not be listed on any securities exchange. Therefore, in order to sell your securities, you will need to find a willing buyer. The underwriters may assist in the resale of securities, but they are not required to do so. Additionally, events in the global financial markets, including the failure, acquisition or government seizure of major financial institutions, the establishment of government bailout

9

programs for financial institutions, problems related to financial assets, the de-valuation of various assets in secondary markets, the forced sale of asset-backed and other securities as a result of the de-leveraging of structured investment vehicles, hedge funds, financial institutions and other entities, the lowering of ratings on certain asset-backed securities and uncertainty surrounding the exit of the United Kingdom and potentially any other country from the European Union, have caused and could further cause a significant reduction in liquidity in the secondary market for asset-backed securities. A period of illiquidity may adversely affect both the market value of your securities and your ability to sell the securities. As a result, you may be unable to obtain the price that you wish to receive for your securities or you may suffer a loss on your investment. Illiquidity can have a severe adverse effect on the prices of securities that are especially sensitive to prepayment, credit or interest rate risk, such as the securities.

Economic Developments May Adversely Affect the Performance and Market Value of Your Notes

The United States has in the past experienced and in the future may experience a recession or period of economic contraction. During the economic downturn following the 2008 financial crisis, elevated unemployment, decreases in home values and reductions in available credit led to increased delinquency and default rates on retail instalment sale contracts. If another financial crisis or economic downturn were to occur again, delinquencies and losses with respect to motor vehicle receivables could increase, which could result in losses on your notes. In addition, decreased consumer demand for motor vehicles and an increase in the inventory of used motor vehicles may depress the price at which repossessed motor vehicles may be sold or delay the timing of those sales. If the default rate on the receivables increases and the price at which the related vehicles may be sold declines, you may experience losses with respect to your securities.

The Sponsor, the Servicer and its Affiliates Must Comply with Governmental Laws and Regulations that are Subject to Change and Involve Significant Costs


Ally Bank and its affiliates, including Ally Financial, are governed by numerous foreign, federal and state laws and the supervision and examination of various regulatory agencies. In July 2010, Congress passed the Dodd-Frank Act, which has adversely affected and could further impact the financial services industry. The financial services industry has undergone and will continue to undergo further increased regulation, such as additional disclosure and other obligations, restrictions on pricing and enforcement proceedings resulting from the Dodd-Frank Act and other governmental entities.

The Dodd-Frank Act also created the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, or the “CFPB,” a federal regulator, with rulemaking and enforcement authority over consumer finance businesses. In December 2013, Ally Financial and certain of its subsidiaries entered into consent orders issued by the CFPB and the U.S. Department of Justice pertaining to allegations of disparate impact in its automotive finance business, which resulted in a $98 million charge in the fourth quarter of 2013. The consent orders require Ally Financial and certain of its

10

subsidiaries, including Ally Bank, to create a compliance plan addressing, at a minimum, the communication of their expectations of Equal Credit Opportunity Act compliance to dealers, maintenance of their existing limits on dealer finance income for contracts acquired by them, and monitoring for potential discrimination both at the dealer level and across all dealers. Ally Financial formed a compliance committee consisting of directors of Ally Financial and certain of its subsidiaries, including Ally Bank, to oversee their execution of the consent orders’ terms. Ally Financial and certain of its subsidiaries, including Ally Bank, are required to meet certain stipulations under the consent orders, including a requirement to make monetary payments when ongoing remediation targets are not attained. In addition, Ally Financial received document requests from the Securities and Exchange Commission, the Department of Justice and the New York Department of Financial Services in connection with their investigations related to subprime automotive finance and related securitization activities.

Compliance with applicable law and regulations may be costly because new processes, forms, controls and additional infrastructure may be required to comply with new requirements and increased scrutiny. Laws in the financial services industry are designed primarily for the protection of consumers. Any failure to comply with these laws and regulations could result in significant statutory civil and criminal penalties, monetary damages, attorneys’ fees and costs, possible revocation of licenses and damage to reputation, brand and valued customer relationships. Many rules under the Dodd-Frank Act have been implemented by the applicable federal regulatory agencies but, in some cases, the applicable rules have not become effective or additional rulemaking required under the Dodd-Frank Act has not been completed. Therefore, the full impact of the Dodd-Frank Act on the financial markets and its participants and on the asset backed securities market in particular will not be known for some time. No assurance can be given that the Dodd-Frank Act and its implementing regulations, or the imposition of additional regulations, including the orderly liquidation authority of the Dodd-Frank Act, will not have a significant adverse impact on the issuing entity, the depositor, the sponsor, the administrator or the servicer, including on the servicing of the receivables, or the price that a subsequent purchaser would be willing to pay for your notes.

Additionally, new federal tax laws were recently enacted that provide for significant changes to U.S. tax law, some of which may have an adverse impact on the business, financial condition and results of operations of the sponsor, the seller, the depositor, the issuing entity or their affiliates, or an adverse impact on you. The new rules are complex and lack developed administrative guidance; thus, the impact of certain aspects of its provisions on the sponsor, the seller, the depositor, the issuing entity or their affiliates, or on you, is currently unclear.

11

New Car Incentive Purchase Programs and other Market Factors May Reduce the Value of the Vehicles that Secure the Receivables

The pricing of used cars is affected by the supply and demand for those cars, which, in turn, is affected by consumer demand and tastes, recalls, economic factors (including the price of gasoline and closure of dealerships), the introduction and pricing of new car models and other factors. Decisions by a manufacturer with respect to new vehicle production and brands, pricing and incentives may affect used car prices, particularly those for the same or similar models. An increase in the supply or a decrease in the demand for used cars may negatively impact the resale value of the vehicles securing the receivables. Decreases in the value of those vehicles may, in turn, reduce the incentive of obligors to make payments on the receivables and decrease the proceeds realized by the issuing entity from vehicle repossessions, which could result in losses on your notes.

FDIC Receivership or Conservatorship of Ally Bank Could Result in Delays in Payments or Losses on Your Notes

Ally Bank is a Utah chartered bank and its deposits are insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, or the “FDIC.” If Ally Bank becomes insolvent, is in an unsound condition, violates its bylaws or regulations or engages in similar activity, the FDIC could be appointed as conservator or receiver for Ally Bank. In a receivership or conservatorship of Ally Bank, the FDIC as receiver or conservator would have broad powers to delay or reduce payments on your notes, if the FDIC were to be successful in:

• attempting to recharacterize the securitization of the receivables as a loan or otherwise attempting to recapture the receivables that have been conveyed to the issuing entity; or

• requiring the issuing entity, as assignee of the depositor, to go through an administrative claims procedure to establish its rights to payments collected on the receivables; or

• requesting a stay of proceedings to liquidate claims or otherwise enforce contractual and legal remedies against Ally Bank; or

• repudiating without compensation Ally Bank’s ongoing servicing obligations under the servicing agreement, such as its duty to collect and remit payments or otherwise service the receivables; or

• arguing that a statutory injunction automatically prevents the indenture trustee and other transaction parties from exercising their rights, remedies and interests for up to 90 days.

To limit the FDIC’s potential use of any of these powers, Ally Bank has structured this transaction to take advantage of a special regulation that the FDIC has created, entitled “Treatment of financial assets transferred in connection with a securitization or participation.” This FDIC regulation, which we refer to as the “FDIC Rule,” contains four

12

separate safe harbors for transactions; in this prospectus, we describe the safe harbors applicable to securitizations based on whether the securitizations do or do not qualify for sale accounting treatment. The FDIC Rule limits the rights of the FDIC, as conservator or receiver, to delay or prevent payments to noteholders in securitization transactions. For a description of the FDIC Rule’s preconditions and effects, including the uncertainty regarding its application and interpretation, see “Insolvency Aspects of the Offerings—FDIC Rule” in this prospectus.

The Class A Notes are Subject to Risk Because Payments on the Class A Notes are Subordinated to Servicing Fees and Other Payments


The Class A Notes are subject to risk because payments of principal and interest on the Class A Notes are subordinated, as described below, to servicing fees, payments to the asset representations reviewer and payments to the indenture trustee and the vote tabulation agent with respect to an asset representations review.

Principal and interest payments on the Class A Notes on each distribution date will be subordinated to the basic servicing fee due to the servicer, payments to the asset representations reviewer, payments to the indenture trustee and the vote tabulation agent with respect to an asset representations review. If an event of default occurs and the notes are accelerated, principal payments on the Class A-2 Notes, the Class A-3 Notes, the Class A-4 Notes and the Class B Notes will be subordinated to principal payments on the Class A-1 Notes, principal payments on the Class A-3 Notes, the Class A-4 Notes and the Class B Notes will be subordinated to principal payments on the Class A-1 Notes and the Class A-2 Notes, principal payments on the Class A-4 Notes and the Class B Notes will be subordinated to principal payments on the Class A-1 Notes, the Class A-2 Notes and the Class A-3 Notes and principal payments on the Class B Notes will be subordinated to principal payments on the Class A-1 Notes, the Class A-2 Notes, the Class A-3 Notes and the Class A-4 Notes. This subordination could result in reduced or delayed payments of principal and interest on the Class A Notes.

The Class B Notes are Subject to Greater Risk Because the Class B Notes are Subordinated to the Class A Notes

The Class B Notes bear greater risks than the Class A Notes because payments of interest and principal on the Class B Notes are subordinated, to the extent described below, to payments of interest and principal on the Class A Notes.

Interest payments on the Class B Notes on each distribution date will be subordinated to servicing fees due to the servicer, payments to the asset representations reviewer, payments to the indenture trustee and the vote tabulation agent with respect to an asset representations review, interest payments on the Class A Notes and principal payments to the Class A Notes to the extent the aggregate principal balance of the Class A Notes as of the preceding distribution date exceeds the aggregate receivables principal balance as of the close of business on the last day of the immediately preceding monthly period. In addition,

13

on each distribution date after an event of default occurs and the notes are accelerated, until the time when all events of default have been cured or waived as provided in the indenture, no interest will be paid on the Class B Notes until all principal of and interest on the Class A Notes have been paid in full.

Principal payments on the Class B Notes will be subordinated in priority to the Class A Notes. No principal will be paid on the Class B Notes until all principal of the Class A Notes has been paid in full. See “The Notes—Distributions” in this prospectus.

This subordination could result in reduced or delayed payments of principal and interest on the Class B Notes.

Holders of the Class B Notes May Suffer Losses Because They Have Limited Control Over Actions of the Issuing Entity and Conflicts Between Classes of Notes May Occur


The most senior outstanding class of notes will be the controlling class under the indenture. Thus, while any Class A Notes are outstanding, that will be the controlling class. Thereafter, as long as any Class B Notes are outstanding, that will be the controlling class.

The rights of the controlling class will include the following:

• following an event of default, to direct the indenture trustee to exercise one or more of the remedies specified in the indenture relating to the property of the issuing entity, including a sale of the receivables;

• following a servicer default, to waive the servicer default or to terminate the servicer;

• to remove the indenture trustee and appoint a successor; and

• to consent to specified types of amendments to the indenture and the transfer and servicing agreements.

In exercising any rights or remedies under the indenture, the controlling class may act solely in its own interests. Therefore, holders of Class B Notes that are subordinated to the controlling class will not be able to participate in the determination of any proposed actions that are within the purview of the controlling class, and the controlling class could take actions that would adversely affect the Class B Notes.

Furthermore, the issuing entity’s failure to make a timely payment of interest will constitute an event of default under the indenture only if the failure relates to the controlling class.

14

Retained Notes May Reduce the Liquidity of Your Notes and Subsequent Sales by the Depositor or an Affiliate May Adversely Affect Their Value


Approximately 5% (by initial principal balance) of each of the Class A-1 Notes, the Class A-2 Notes, the Class A-3 Notes, the Class A-4 Notes and the Class B Notes will be retained by the depositor or another majority-owned affiliate of the sponsor. If any such retained notes are subsequently sold by the depositor or the other affiliate, the demand and the market price of the notes already in the market could be adversely affected.

Limited Enforceability of the Receivables Could Reduce or Delay Payments on the Securities

Federal and state consumer protection laws regulate the creation and enforcement of consumer loans such as the receivables. Specific statutory liabilities are imposed upon creditors who fail to comply with these regulatory provisions. In some cases, this liability could affect an assignee’s ability to enforce secured loans such as the receivables and could also reduce the funds that the issuing entity would otherwise have to make payments on your securities.

Recent interpretations of regulations implementing the Military Lending Act indicate that retail instalment sale contracts that include credit-related ancillary products (guaranteed asset protection (GAP), credit life, and similar credit products) may need to comply with the requirements of the Military Lending Act. Regulations implementing the Military Lending Act limit the military annual percentage rate, adjust arbitration rules and require additional disclosures. Failure to comply with these requirements could render the related receivables void and may also subject the issuing entity to liability. Financial services industry groups are continuing to seek further clarification from the Department of Defense on the interpretations of the regulations implementing the Military Lending Act. Although not expected to be material at this time, if the recent interpretations are ultimately unchanged and if an obligor made a claim for a violation of the Military Lending Act, Ally Bank will repurchase the receivable unless the breach is cured. If Ally Bank fails to repurchase the receivable, you might experience reductions or delays in payments on your securities. See “Legal Aspects of the Receivables—Consumer Protection Laws” in this prospectus.

You May Receive an Early Return of Your Investment or Incur a Shortfall in the Return of Your Investment Following an Event of Default Under the Indenture


If an event of default occurs under the indenture, the holders of a majority of the aggregate principal balance of the controlling class of the notes may declare the accrued interest and outstanding principal immediately due and payable. In that event, the indenture trustee may

15

be directed to sell the receivables and other assets of the trust and apply the proceeds to repay the notes. The manner of sale will affect the amount of proceeds received and available for distribution. The liquidation and distribution of trust assets may result in an early return of principal to noteholders. You may not be able to reinvest the principal repaid to you for a rate of return or maturity date that is as favorable as those on your notes. Also, the proceeds from sale of the trust assets may not be sufficient to fully pay amounts owed on the notes. Those circumstances may result in losses to noteholders.

You May Suffer Losses on Your Investment Because The Indenture Trustee Does Not Have a Direct Perfected Security Interest In the Motor Vehicles Underlying the Receivables


Payments on the notes and the certificates are dependent on the payments made on the receivables and, in the case of non-payment of receivables, the proceeds from the sale of the related vehicles. Each of the trust, the depositor and the indenture trustee derives its indirect perfected security interest in any specified vehicle through one or more assignments, commencing with an assignment from Ally Bank to the depositor. In the event of an insolvency of Ally Bank, the indenture trustee may be hindered or delayed in its ability to enforce its rights in the motor vehicles relating to defaulted receivables because the indenture trustee is not the secured party of record. Those hindrances and delays may result in a shortfall in liquidation proceeds available to repay noteholders. As a result, under those circumstances, you may experience a loss or delay in repayment of principal on your notes or distributions on the certificates.

The Servicer Has Discretion Over the Servicing of the Receivables and the Manner in Which the Servicer Applies that Discretion May Impact the Amount and Timing of Funds Available to Pay Principal and Interest on the Notes and Distributions on the Certificates




The servicer has discretion in servicing the receivables, including the ability to grant payment extensions and to determine the timing and method of collection and liquidation procedures. See “Servicing Procedures” in this prospectus. The manner in which the servicer exercises that discretion could have an impact on the amount and timing of receipts by the trust from the receivables. For a description of the impact modifications on the receivables will have on the notes, see “The Notes—Distributions” in this prospectus. If the servicer’s servicing procedures do not maximize the receipts from the receivables, the result may be losses or delays in payment on the securities. There are additional requirements with respect to the exercise of this discretion because the trust is a grantor trust. See “Servicing Procedures” in this prospectus.

16

Temporary Commingling of Funds by the Servicer Prior to Their Deposit into the Collection Account may Result in Losses or Delays in Payment on the Notes and the Certificates



The servicer receives collections on the receivables into an account of the servicer that contains other funds of the servicer and amounts collected by the servicer in respect of other receivables not owned by the issuing entity. Generally, the servicer is not required to transfer those funds to the collection account until two business days following receipt. This temporary commingling of funds prior to the deposit of collections on the receivables into the collection account may result in a delay or reduction in the amounts available to make payments on the notes if, in the event of a bankruptcy of the servicer, those funds are subject to the automatic stay under the bankruptcy laws or the servicer or the bankruptcy trustee is unable to specifically identify those funds and there are competing claims on those funds by other creditors of the servicer.

The Insolvency or Replacement of the Servicer May Reduce or Delay Payments on the Notes

If Ally Bank were to cease acting as servicer for any reason, including as a result of an Ally Bank insolvency, collection practices of a successor servicer, which under certain circumstances may be the indenture trustee, may vary from those of Ally Bank. In addition, after a successor servicer is appointed, the successor servicer may experience some inefficiencies as a result of the transition. While Ally Bank is not permitted to resign or be terminated as servicer until a replacement servicer is installed, if Ally Bank were to become incapable of acting as servicer, a successor servicer had not yet accepted appointment and the indenture trustee failed to satisfy its obligations to act as replacement servicer, there could be a disruption in servicing that could result in a delay or decrease in collections on the receivables. It may become increasingly difficult to identify a qualified successor servicer other than the indenture trustee because the servicing fee is calculated as a percentage of the aggregate outstanding principal balance of the receivables and some cost components of servicing are fixed; consequently, as the pool amortizes, the servicing fee will diminish at a greater rate than the cost of servicing. For the foregoing reasons, if there is a need to replace the servicer, you may experience delays or reductions in the payments on your securities.

The Ratings for the Notes Are Limited in Scope, May be Unsolicited, May Not Continue to Be Issued and Do Not Consider the Suitability of the Notes for You


We expect to hire rating agencies to rate the notes for the trust. The notes may receive a rating from a rating agency not hired to rate the notes. A security rating is not a recommendation to buy, sell or hold the notes. The rating considers only the likelihood that the trust will pay interest on time and will ultimately pay principal in full. Ratings on the notes do not address the timing of distributions of principal on the notes prior to their applicable final scheduled distribution date. The ratings do not consider the prices of the notes or their suitability to a particular investor. The ratings may be revised or withdrawn at any time, and

17

rating agencies not hired to rate the notes may provide an unsolicited rating that is different from or lower than the ratings provided by the rating agencies hired to rate the notes. If a rating agency issues a rating lower than the solicited ratings, changes its rating or withdraws its rating, no party has an obligation to provide additional credit enhancement or to restore the original rating. None of the sponsor, the servicer or any of their respective affiliates is under any obligation to monitor or disclose any changes to the ratings. There may be a conflict of interest for the rating agencies hired to rate the notes because the sponsor paid the fee charged by each rating agency for its rating services. Additionally, if any rating agency provides an unsolicited rating that is lower than the ratings provided by the rating agencies hired to rate the notes, the market value of the notes may be adversely affected. Moreover, criminal, civil or regulatory actions or other events adverse to a rating agency hired to rate the notes may have a detrimental effect on the credibility of such rating agency’s ratings, which could have an adverse effect on the market value of your notes.

18

SUMMARY OF TRANSACTION PARTIES^*

* This chart provides only a simplified overview of the relationships among the key parties to the transaction. Refer to this prospectus for a further description.

** See “Summary—Priority of Distributions” for a description of the relative priorities of each class. Approximately 5% (by initial principal balance) of each of the Class A-1 Notes, the Class A-2 Notes, the Class A-3 Notes, the Class A-4 Notes, the Class B Notes, the Class C Notes and the Class D Notes will be retained by the depositor or another majority-owned affiliate of the sponsor. The Class C Notes and the Class D Notes (other than the EVI) will be sold in one or more private placements or retained initially by the depositor or its affiliate. The depositor or its affiliate will retain the right to sell at any time all or a portion of such retained notes to the extent that it is not required to retain such notes. The certificates will be retained by the depositor, a majority-owned affiliate of the sponsor or another affiliate of the depositor as described in “Credit Risk Retention” in this prospectus.

19

SUMMARY OF MONTHLY DEPOSITS TO AND WITHDRAWALS FROM ACCOUNTS*

* This chart provides only a simplified overview of the monthly flow of funds. Refer to this prospectus for a further description.

20

THE SPONSOR

Ally Bank is the sponsor of the transaction set forth in this prospectus.

Ally Bank was incorporated in 2004 under the laws of the State of Utah relating to industrial loan corporations under the name “GMAC Automotive Bank,” and changed its name to “GMAC Bank” in 2006. In December 2008, GMAC Bank converted into a Utah-chartered commercial nonmember bank and in May 2009 further changed its name to “Ally Bank.” In March 2016, Ally Bank received approval from the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (“FRB”) to become a state member bank and be regulated by the FRB through the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago. Ally Bank is subject to regulation primarily by the FRB and the Utah Department of Financial Institutions.

The sponsor is a wholly owned indirect subsidiary of Ally Financial. On December 24, 2008, and in connection with the conversion of Ally Bank into a Utah-chartered commercial nonmember bank, Ally Financial and IB Finance Holding Company, LLC (“IB Finance”) were each approved by the FRB as bank holding companies under the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, as amended (“BHCA”). IB Finance is the direct holding company for Ally Bank and is a subsidiary of Ally Financial. As a result, Ally Financial and IB Finance are now subject to the supervision and examination of the FRB.

Ally Bank has its principal office at 200 West Civic Center Drive, Sandy, Utah, 84070, Tel. No. (801) 790-5000, and administrative offices at 1100 Virginia Drive, Ft. Washington, Pennsylvania 19034.

Ally Bank provides a wide variety of automotive financial services to and through dealerships and to the customers of those dealerships. In these lines of business, Ally Bank principally finances the acquisition and resale by dealerships of various new and used automotive and non-automotive products, and acquires from those dealers instalment obligations covering retail sales and leases of new and used vehicles. Ally Bank also provides dealer equipment facilities financing, residential mortgage financing and wholesale and retail financing.

Ally Bank’s financing operations are organized into two segments—automotive and mortgage products. The products and services offered by Ally Bank’s automotive financing operations include the funding of retail instalment sale contracts, direct purchase money loans and leases, extension of term loans, dealer floorplan financing and other lines of credit.

In the retail market, Ally Bank provides vehicle financing to consumers through automotive dealerships, under the Ally Bank brand name. In most cases, Ally Bank purchases retail instalment sale contracts and lease contracts for new and used vehicles and other products from dealers.

In the wholesale market, Ally Bank finances the acquisition and resale by dealerships of various new automotive and nonautomotive products.

Ally Bank has been actively acquiring or originating assets, including retail instalment sale contracts, direct purchase money loans and leases and loans to dealers for the financing of dealer inventory, since its incorporation in 2004. Ally Bank began securitizing retail assets in 2009, wholesale assets in 2010 and lease assets in 2011.

When Ally Bank securitizes automotive retail instalment sale contracts and wholesale finance receivables, it may retain an interest in the sold assets. These interests may take the form of asset-backed securities, including senior and subordinated interests in the form of investment grade, non-investment grade or unrated securities. The EVI in the trust retained by the depositor or a majority-owned affiliate of the sponsor is described under “Credit Risk Retention” in this prospectus.

None of Ally Bank or any of its affiliates other than the issuing entity will be obligated to make, or otherwise guarantee, any principal, interest or other payment on the notes or the certificates.

Ally Bank has securitized its retail auto receivables in five registered offerings in 2010, five registered offerings in 2011, five registered offerings in 2012, two registered offerings in 2013, three registered offerings in

21

2014, two registered offerings in 2015, three registered offerings in 2016 and five registered offerings in 2017. Ally Bank completed two private placement retail auto transactions in 2009, one private placement lease transaction in 2011, one private placement retail auto transaction in 2012, one registered lease offering in 2012, one registered lease offering in 2013, two registered lease offerings in 2014, one private placement retail auto transaction in 2014, one registered lease offering in 2015 and one private placement retail auto transaction in 2017. In those retail and lease securitizations, Ally Bank sponsored trusts and issuing entities have issued securities with an aggregate initial principal balance of approximately $42.8 billion. Ally Bank has securitized its wholesale receivables in one registered offering and four private placement transactions in 2010, four registered offerings and one private placement transaction in 2011, five registered offerings in 2012, three registered offerings in 2013, five registered offerings in 2014, three registered offerings in 2015 and three registered offerings in 2017, with the publicly offered and privately placed notes having an aggregate initial principal balance of approximately $18.5 billion. As of September 30, 2017, none of the prior securitizations sponsored by Ally Bank have defaulted or experienced an early amortization or similar triggering event.

For further details with respect to Ally Bank’s prior retail vehicle instalment sale contract securitizations over the last five years, see “Appendix A—Static Pool Data” in this prospectus.

ACQUISITION AND UNDERWRITING

Acquisition and Underwriting

Ally Bank will acquire or originate the receivables in the ordinary course of business from participating automobile and light truck dealers in accordance with the requirements of its agreements with dealers.

Ally Bank’s process of acquiring receivables begins, in general, with the application by a customer for financing of a motor vehicle at the point of purchase from a participating dealer. Applications are initiated through websites established and maintained by the sponsor or its affiliates or third parties. Prior to December 31, 2014, applications could also have been initiated by fax.

Ally Bank currently uses an underwriting process in which applications are reviewed solely by Ally Bank credit underwriters. Prior to April 2017, Ally Bank and Ally Financial used an underwriting process in which applications were reviewed solely by Ally Financial credit underwriters. Under the previous process, those credit underwriters used Ally Bank’s underwriting standards when evaluating applications on behalf of Ally Bank. For receivables originated prior to May 2011, all applications were initially reviewed by Ally Financial, and then applications intended for Ally Bank were reviewed separately by Ally Bank. As the underwriting was done on behalf of Ally Bank and as Ally Bank retained the right to review all contracts and required Ally Financial to purchase any that failed to meet Ally Bank’s standards, we generally refer in this prospectus to Ally Bank rather than Ally Financial when describing the underwriting process.

The current application evaluation process begins with the placement of each application into one of 21 analytical categories or “segments,” based on specified aspects of the applicant’s credit profile and, in many cases, whether the related vehicle is new or used. Ally Bank then evaluates each application by applying a proprietary credit scoring algorithm, which it refers to as a “scorecard,” tailored to the applicable segment. Ally Financial and Ally Bank designed the initial scorecards with assistance from a third party credit scoring company. Inputs used by the scorecards vary, but typically include, among other items: (1) severity and aging of delinquency; (2) number of credit inquiries; (3) loan-to-value ratio; and (4) payment-to-income ratio. The scorecards are reviewed and updated on a periodic basis in order to account for changes in the perceived impact of specific inputs on applicant creditworthiness. The most recent scorecard redevelopment was implemented in August 2017.

The output of the proprietary scorecard is referred to as the “Ally score.” The Ally score predicts the statistical likelihood that a loss will occur with respect to that receivable, but does not predict the performance of any receivable with certainty. Ally Bank uses the Ally score and other credit scores to sort applicants into 28 tier grades. Concurrently with this process, Ally Bank takes other steps to gather information regarding the applicant, such as checking lists maintained by the Office of Foreign Assets Control and performing fraud and duplicate application checks.

22

Once the information is gathered, Ally Bank analyzes the application to determine whether to approve it and offer to purchase the receivable. These determinations are made judgmentally on the basis of all of the information available to Ally Bank, including the following:

• the applicant’s credit tier and Ally score,

• the prospective purchaser’s experience in managing instalment and revolving debt,

• the asset value of the vehicle and the loan-to-value ratio for the receivable,

• the term of the receivable, and

• the prospective purchaser’s ability to pay.

Ally Bank’s standards also require physical damage insurance to be in place on each financed vehicle at the time of origination.

Applications are first evaluated through an automated process. Applications are approved or declined and credit decisions are made either entirely through the automated process or through the automated process followed by manual review by a credit underwriter. Ally Bank developed its automated process in order to expedite the review of applications. The automated process uses an algorithm to approve applications with various combinations of credit factors that Ally Bank has observed over time will receive credit underwriter approval. As a result, there are many clusters of credit factors that will lead to an automated approval, rather than one or a few sets of benchmark characteristics. Final approval based solely on automated approval, without manual review, is limited to the higher quality credit tiers. However, even in the highest quality credit tier, a significant portion of approved applications are approved by credit underwriters rather than by the automated process.

For approved applications, buy rates applicable to the instalment sale contracts are assigned on the basis of the Ally score in accordance with pricing tiers that are currently managed by Ally Bank and that prior to April 2017 were managed by Ally Financial and Ally Bank.

The sponsor may use programs developed and maintained by the sponsor or third parties that would allow it to complete the entire contracting process electronically. The resulting contracts will be electronically signed by the related obligors and maintained by the sponsor or third parties in electronic form only.

Underwriting Exceptions

Ally Bank has established a series of policies, or “underwriting criteria,” that apply to the review of a credit application. The underwriting criteria contain guidelines for many attributes of an application, such as a maximum loan-to-value ratio, maximum payment-to-income ratio and minimum credit score and, for lower credit quality applicants, maximum debt-to-income ratio. For used vehicles, additional guidelines exist for vehicle model year and mileage. Some, but not all, of these guidelines will vary according to the credit tier of the applicant or the term of the proposed contract, with a higher credit tier or a shorter contract term generally having a more permissive guideline.

Credit underwriters have a limited ability to approve exceptions to the guidelines contained in the underwriting criteria. Exceptions to the credit policies must be approved by credit underwriters with appropriate credit authority. Approved applicants that do not comply with all credit guidelines typically have strong compensating factors that indicate a high ability of the applicant to repay the receivable, such as a co-obligor, a lower loan-to-value ratio or a shorter loan term. Examples of underwriting exceptions may include allowing a longer term or a greater ratio of payment to income, debt to income or loan to value than the standard allowances for such criteria or allowing higher mileage or an earlier model year for a used vehicle. Ally Bank monitors exceptions to the guidelines, with the goals of limiting exceptions to a small portion of approved applications and rarely permitting more than a single exception for any contract. Information regarding receivables that constituted exceptions to the guidelines is disclosed in this prospectus under “The Receivables Pool—Exceptions to Underwriting Guidelines.”

23

Subvention

Some receivables are originated under incentive programs sponsored by vehicle manufacturers, for which the financing rates are below the standard rates at which Ally Bank otherwise offers financing under retail contracts. Those receivables are referred to as subvented receivables.

Because the rates on the subvented receivables are lower than would otherwise be offered by Ally Bank, Ally Bank purchases those subvented receivables from the dealers and the applicable manufacturer pays the present value of the difference between the customer’s subvented rate and Ally Bank’s standard rate to Ally Financial on behalf of the dealer selling the related vehicle and Ally Financial forwards such amount to Ally Bank.

The percentage of subvented receivables in the pool is disclosed in this prospectus. See “The Receivables Pool—Composition of the Receivables Pool—(Total: New and Used).” Subvention is not taken into account by Ally Bank when determining the “odds” credit scoring.

THE SERVICER

On the closing date, Ally Bank, a Utah chartered bank, will be appointed the servicer of the pool of retail instalment sale contracts to be owned by the trust pursuant to the servicing agreement among the servicer, the trust and the depositor. Ally Financial and Ally Bank will have serviced those retail instalment sale contracts on behalf of Ally Bank prior to the transfer under the pooling agreement.

Ally Bank began servicing assets in April 2016. Between April 2016 and March 2017, Ally Bank acted as a sub-servicer for Ally Financial with responsibility for certain servicing activities related to the entire U.S. portfolio of retail instalment sale contracts and leases that were not delinquent and serviced by Ally Financial. Ally Bank performs its servicing operations from centers located in Jacksonville, Florida; Lewisville, Texas and Detroit, Michigan. Since March 2017, Ally Bank began acting as primary servicer for its retail instalment sale contracts and leases. Ally Bank only acts as servicer or sub-servicer with respect to receivables it originates or acquires for itself and Ally Financial and its affiliates and does not service assets that were not originated or acquired by Ally Bank for any other parties.

Ally Bank has entered into agreements with Ally Servicing LLC, or “Ally Servicing,” and Ally Financial under which Ally Servicing and Ally Financial have agreed to provide services with respect to the trust. Ally Servicing and Ally Financial act at the direction of Ally Bank and in compliance with the Servicing Agreement. For a further description of the Servicing Agreement, see “The Transfer Agreements and the Servicing Agreements” in this prospectus. In the event of any removal of Ally Bank as the servicer, Ally Servicing and Ally Financial may no longer be involved in the servicing of the receivables.

Ally Servicing is a wholly owned subsidiary of Ally Bank. Ally Servicing, a Delaware limited liability company, was originally incorporated as AccuTel, Inc. on April 8, 1999. On July 21, 2005, AccuTel changed its name to Semperian, Inc. Semperian, Inc. subsequently converted to a limited liability company. Semperian LLC changed its name to Ally Servicing LLC in August 2010.

Ally Servicing has its principal office at Ally Detroit Center, 500 Woodward Avenue, Detroit, Michigan 48226 Tel. No. 888-925-2559.

Since 1999, Ally Servicing has acted as a sub-servicer for Ally Financial, and has assumed increased servicing responsibilities over time. Currently, Ally Servicing acts as a sub-servicer for the entire U.S. portfolio of retail instalment sale contracts and leases serviced by Ally Bank. Ally Servicing performs its sub-servicing operations from centers located in Jacksonville, Florida; Shoreview, Minnesota; Lewisville, Texas; and Little Rock, Arkansas. Ally Servicing only acts as sub-servicer for Ally Bank and its affiliates, including Ally Financial, and does not service assets for any other parties.

24

Prior to March 2017, Ally Financial, directly and through its subsidiaries, most notably Ally Servicing and Ally Bank, serviced prime and non-prime automobile retail instalment sale contracts and leases acquired or originated by it and others on behalf of banks, credit unions, finance companies and securitized trusts.

As of September 30, 2017, Ally Financial has originated over 85 securitizations of retail vehicle instalment sale contracts through a combination of registered offerings and privately placed transactions. In those securitizations, Ally Financial has issued securities with an aggregate initial principal balance of over $140 billion.

General Motors Acceptance Corporation, the predecessor of Ally Financial, was incorporated in 1919 under the New York Banking Law relating to investment companies. General Motors Acceptance Corporation relinquished that status and became a Delaware corporation on January 1, 1998. Ally Financial has its principal executive offices at 500 Woodward Avenue, Detroit, Michigan 48226. It provides services from multiple locations throughout the United States. In July 2006, General Motors Acceptance Corporation converted to a Delaware limited liability company and changed its name to GMAC LLC. In June 2009, GMAC LLC converted to a Delaware corporation and changed its name to GMAC Inc. On May 10, 2010, GMAC Inc. changed its name to Ally Financial Inc.

On November 30, 2006, General Motors Corporation sold 51% of the common equity interests of Ally Financial to a consortium of investors, led by an affiliate of Cerberus Capital Management, L.P. We refer to that transaction as the “Acquisition.”

On December 24, 2008, and in connection with the conversion of GMAC Bank into a Utah-chartered commercial nonmember bank, Ally Financial and IB Finance were each approved by the FRB as bank holding companies under the BHCA. IB Finance is a subsidiary of Ally Financial and the direct holding company for Ally Financial’s bank depository institution, GMAC Bank, which is now known as Ally Bank. On December 23, 2013, Ally Financial was approved by the FRB as a financial holding company under the BHCA.

Since becoming a bank holding company, Ally Financial received various investments from the U.S. Department of the Treasury, the “Treasury,” in connection with the Treasury’s Supervisory Capital Assessment Program. On November 20, 2013, Ally Financial repurchased all of the Treasury’s then outstanding mandatorily convertible preferred stock. On April 15, 2014, Ally Financial closed an initial public offering of 95,000,000 shares of its common stock. The Treasury announced on December 19, 2014 that it had sold its remaining Ally Financial common stock.

Ally Financial may act as a service provider to facilitate the servicing of the retail instalment sale contracts by Ally Bank and the enforcement of Ally Bank’s rights under those contracts.

A table under “The Sponsor’s Portfolio Data—Delinquencies, Repossessions, Bankruptcies and Net Losses” sets forth the size and composition of the total portfolio of retail vehicle instalment sale contracts of Ally Bank for which Ally Financial has provided servicing in each of the last five years.

SERVICING PROCEDURES

Some of the principal functions of the servicer are tracking the balances of outstanding receivables, notifying obligors of the amounts and due dates of their required payments, communicating with obligors regarding their accounts, seeking to collect overdue payments and, where necessary, charging off receivables and repossessing and liquidating the related motor vehicle. Subject to provisions in the servicing agreement restricting the servicer or specifying obligations different from its customary standards, policies and procedures for a grantor trust, pursuant to its customary standards, policies and procedures, comparable to practices followed by the servicer in servicing receivables for itself or other third parties, and to its obligation under the transaction documents to make reasonable efforts to collect all payments on the receivables, the servicer may grant rebates, deferrals, alterations, amendments, adjustments or extensions on a receivable. However, if that modification of a receivable alters the amount financed, the APR or the number of originally scheduled due dates so that the last scheduled due date occurs after the final scheduled distribution date, the servicer will be obligated to purchase that receivable.

25

The servicer may only make certain limited extensions or deferrals. If an obligor requests an extension, the servicer may only grant an extension if it believes that such extension is necessary to preserve the value of the receivable and to prevent the receivable from going into default or from becoming further impaired and that such extension does not exceed 90 days in the aggregate during any 12-month period and 180 total days during the life of the receivable. The servicer may also provide for a deferral of payment with respect to a receivable which is in default and which the servicer believes is necessary to preserve the value of the receivable and to prevent the receivable from becoming further impaired. The servicer has the discretion to grant any modification if it delivers an opinion of counsel to the owner trustee to the effect that such modifications will not cause the trust to fail to qualify as a grantor trust for federal income tax purposes. In addition, the servicer may make modifications that are ministerial in nature, such as changing the payment due date or waiving any prepayment charges.

Subject to the restrictions on discretion because the trust is a grantor trust and any additional restrictions in the servicing agreement, the servicer is allowed, for example, without the prior consent of the depositor, the trust, the indenture trustee, the owner trustee, or any other person, to establish the means and timing for contacting obligors in respect of overdue payments, repossess the vehicles securing the receivables, deliver notices, demands, claims, complaints, responses or other documents in connection with any proceedings, execute any instruments of satisfaction or cancellation, or of partial or full release or discharge of underlying obligors, grant extensions, rebates or adjustments on a receivable and waive any prepayment, late payment, or any other fees or charges that may be collected in the ordinary course of servicing such receivables. The servicer is not liable for the exercise of discretion made in good faith and in accordance with its established servicing procedures.

The servicer maintains the account information with respect to each serviced account. That information resides on a centralized accounts receivable system that is currently maintained by HP Enterprise Services and for which the servicer has a right of use under a perpetual license. The servicer is also responsible for maintaining title records with respect to vehicles securing serviced contracts together with the related contract. As of the date of this prospectus, those documents are maintained for the servicer by PDP Group, Inc. at a facility in Hunt Valley, Maryland. Images of those documents are maintained on systems maintained at and accessible from locations different from the locations of the physical documents. Each contract included in the pool is marked on the applicable computer files to indicate its transfer to the trust.

The servicer will make reasonable efforts to collect all payments due on the receivables held by the trust and will, consistent with the servicing agreement, follow the collection procedures it follows for comparable motor vehicle receivables that it services for itself or others. See “Legal Aspects of the Receivables” in this prospectus.

The servicer produces and mails a monthly statement of account, or electronically delivers notification of statement availability through its website, to obligors prior to the due date of the related payment. Payments may be made either by check or through an automated clearing house (ACH) debit of the obligor’s account. If the payment remains outstanding, the servicer mails an initial notice of overdue payment to the obligor on or about the eighth day following the due date.

Obligors whose payment remains delinquent for a specified period following the payment due date are assigned to collections groups based on their risk profile, which is formulated from an algorithm tied to the obligor’s payment history. Most obligors initially receive an automated voice message notifying them of the delinquency. If a payment remains outstanding, most accounts are subsequently assigned to the low risk collections group, which contacts obligors using an automated dialing system. Low risk collections are outsourced to third parties with which Ally Servicing contracts for the provision of collection related services. These third parties act under the direct supervision of Ally Servicing and are required to follow the servicer’s servicing policies. Genpact has been providing this service to Ally Servicing since July 2008. In February 2010, Sykes Enterprises Incorporated, or “Sykes,” acquired ICT Group, which had been providing this service to Ally Servicing since April 2007. Alliance One, a Teleperformance company, provided this service to Ally Servicing from December 2009 to July 2015.

Based on the algorithm, responsibility for calls progresses to the early high risk collections group at differing times but generally at no later than 31 days past due. The early high risk collection teams attempt to establish contact with the obligor by telephone and continue to attempt to obtain payment. Early high risk collections are outsourced to Genpact, Sykes or Alliance One. If an account has a higher risk score, it will be transferred to an Ally Servicing collection group.

26

Depending on the risk profile, delinquent accounts typically progress from the early high risk collections group to the high risk collections group at 60 days past due. The high risk collection teams attempt to establish contact with the obligor by telephone and continue to attempt to obtain payment. High risk collection activity is performed by Ally Servicing.

If the servicer determines that eventual payment in full of a receivable is unlikely, the servicer will follow its normal practices and procedures to realize upon the receivable, including the repossession and disposition of the financed vehicle securing the receivable at a public or private sale, or the taking of any other action permitted by applicable law. The servicer will be entitled to receive its liquidation expenses as specified in the servicing agreement as an allowance for amounts charged to the account of the obligor, in keeping with the servicer’s customary procedures, for refurbishing and disposition of the financed vehicle and other out-of-pocket costs incurred in the liquidation. See “Certain Fees and Expenses” in this prospectus.

Accounts for which the servicer has made a determination to repossess the vehicle are referred to an outside repossession company located in the area of the obligor or in some cases, to a national provider. Those repossession companies are generally small local operations whose sole function is to repossess the related motor vehicle. In some areas, accounts issued for repossession are assigned to a service provider who oversees the repossession activity of their subcontractor. The service provider is responsible for the activity of the subcontractor. Typically, once the car is repossessed, a letter is sent to the obligor to inform them of the repossession, an affidavit of repossession is produced and title is obtained. Generally, the vehicle is then sold at auction (traditional auction or SmartAuction), although, at Ally Bank’s discretion, to maximize net proceeds, limited repairs and or refurbishing may be performed prior to sale.

The net sale proceeds are applied to reduce the balance owing by the obligor. Excess proceeds, if any, are remitted to the obligor. Deficiency balances, if any, are charged off. Following charge off, the account is assigned to the asset recovery center, located in Lewisville, Texas, for evaluation and possible further attempts to collect amounts owing by the obligor. There is an exception to that process for obligors in bankruptcy.

The retail instalment sale contracts require that each obligor on the receivables obtain physical damage insurance covering the vehicle securing each receivable. If an obligor fails to maintain insurance, the servicer may, but is not obligated to, purchase collateral protection insurance, which consists of obtaining a new policy on the obligor’s behalf. If collateral protection insurance is obtained, the servicer charges the related account in an amount equal to the cost of the insurance. Currently, the servicer does not actively monitor whether or not each obligor maintains physical damage insurance.

The securitized pool contains large numbers of individual retail instalment sale contracts entered into by obligors located throughout the United States. This factor requires that the servicer of those contracts have a breadth and scale of operations that may not be required to effectively service many other types of assets. In addition, the security for each contract is a motor vehicle. The processing and maintenance of title and other information related to those motor vehicles requires specific systems capabilities and experience. In addition, repossessing those assets when appropriate requires knowledge and experience as to the methods for taking possession of and retitling the motor vehicle and contacts with the network of auctioneers through which the repossessed vehicles are liquidated.

Collections

The servicer will deposit collections into the collection account held by the indenture trustee within two business days of receipt. However, the servicer may retain these amounts until the distribution date at any time that (a) the Monthly Remittance Condition is satisfied, or (b) arrangements are made which are acceptable to the rating agencies hired to rate the notes. Pending deposit into the collection account, collections may be employed by the servicer at its own risk and for its own benefit and will not be segregated from its own funds. In such case, all gains and losses resulting from the investment of those funds will be for the account of the servicer and will not alter in any respect the amount that the servicer is obligated to remit to the collection account in respect of collections on the following distribution date.

27

Collections made during a monthly period, other than Administrative Receivables or Warranty Receivables, which are not late fees or other similar fees or charges, will be applied to principal and interest on all of these receivables.

Collections on Administrative Receivables and Warranty Receivables, including Administrative Purchase Payments and Warranty Payments, will generally be applied in the manner described in the above paragraph.

Servicing Compensation and Payment of Expenses

On each distribution date, the servicer will receive the following servicing fees:

• a basic servicing fee for the prior month, equal to one-twelfth of the Basic Servicing Fee Rate multiplied by the Aggregate Receivables Face Amount as of the first day of that monthly period,

• any unpaid basic servicing fees from all prior distribution dates, and

• the other servicing fees described in “Certain Fees and Expenses” in this prospectus.

Servicing fees will be paid out of funds available for that purpose. The relative priority of basic servicing fees and any other servicing fees are set forth in “The Notes—Distributions.”

The basic servicing fee for each monthly period and any portion of the basic servicing fee that remains unpaid from prior distribution dates will be paid at the beginning of that monthly period out of collections for that monthly period. In addition, the servicer will retain any late fees, prepayment charges or similar fees and charges collected during a monthly period and any investment earnings on trust accounts during a monthly period.

The foregoing amounts are intended to compensate the servicer for performing the functions of a third party servicer of automobile receivables as an agent for their beneficial owner, including:

• collecting and posting all payments,

• responding to inquiries of obligors on the receivables,

• investigating delinquencies,

• sending payment coupons to obligors,

• reporting tax information to obligors, and

• policing the collateral.

These amounts will also compensate the servicer for its services as the administrator, including accounting for collections, furnishing monthly and annual statements to the owner trustee and the indenture trustee for distributions and generating federal income tax information for the trust, the certificateholders and the noteholders. These amounts also will reimburse the servicer for taxes, the fees of the owner trustee and the indenture trustee, accounting fees, outside auditor fees, data processing costs and other costs incurred in connection with administering the pool of receivables.

THE TRUST

The issuing entity, Ally Auto Receivables Trust 2018-1 is a statutory trust formed under the laws of the State of Delaware with a fiscal year end of December 31. The trust will be established and operated pursuant to a trust agreement dated on or before the anticipated closing date of January 31, 2018 (the “closing date”), which is the date the trust will initially issue the notes and certificates.

28

The trust will engage in only the following activities:

• acquire, hold and manage the receivables and other assets of the trust,

• issue notes and certificates,

• make payments on the notes and certificates, and

• take any action necessary to fulfill the roles of the trust in connection with the notes and the certificates.

The trust’s principal offices are in Wilmington, Delaware, in care of BNY Mellon Trust of Delaware, as owner trustee at the address listed in “The Owner Trustee” below.

The property of the trust will include:

• a pool of retail instalment sale contracts and direct purchase money loans for new and used cars and light trucks and all payments received thereunder on and after the cutoff date exclusive of any amount allocable to the premium for physical damage collateral protection insurance required by the servicer or the seller,

• amounts and investments of those amounts as from time to time may be held in the Designated Accounts and the proceeds of those accounts, except for the Certificate Distribution Account,

• security interests in the financed vehicles and, to the extent permitted by law, any accessions thereto,

• any recourse against dealers on the receivables,

• the right to proceeds of credit life, credit disability, physical damage or other insurance policies covering the financed vehicles, and

• the rights of the depositor under the pooling agreement and the servicing agreement.

The reserve account will be held by the indenture trustee for the benefit of the holders of the trust’s securities. The reserve account will be included in the property of the trust.

The servicer will continue to service the receivables held by the trust and will receive fees for these services. See “Servicing Procedures—Servicing Compensation and Payment of Expenses” in this prospectus. To facilitate the servicing of the receivables, the trust will authorize Ally Bank, as custodian, to retain physical possession of the receivables held by the trust and other documents relating thereto as custodian for the trust. Due to the administrative burden and expense, the certificates of title to the financed vehicles will not be amended to reflect the sale and assignment of the security interest in the financed vehicles to the depositor or the trust or the pledge of these security interests by the trust to the indenture trustee. In the absence of an amendment, the trust and the indenture trustee may not have a perfected security interest in the financed vehicles in all states.

None of the trust, the indenture trustee or the owner trustee will be responsible for the legality, validity or enforceability of any security interest in any financed vehicle. See “Legal Aspects of the Receivables” and “The Transfer Agreements and the Servicing Agreements—Sale and Assignment of Receivables” in this prospectus.

Capitalization of the Trust

The following table illustrates the capitalization of the trust as of January 1, 2018, the cutoff date, as if the issuance of the notes and the certificates had taken place on that date:

29

Class A-1 Asset Backed Notes	$	283,000,000
Class A-2 Asset Backed Notes	$	340,000,000
Class A-3 Asset Backed Notes	$	340,000,000
Class A-4 Asset Backed Notes	$	94,070,000
Class B Asset Backed Notes	$	23,520,000
Class C Asset Backed Notes	$	19,600,000
Class D Asset Backed Notes	$	14,560,000
Asset Backed Certificates	$	5,023,433
Total	$	1,119,773,433

The amount shown for the certificates is the initial level of overcollateralization. The holders of the certificates will be entitled to receive amounts representing the remaining overcollateralization after repayment of amounts owing on the notes. The Class C Notes and the Class D Notes are not being offered under this prospectus. The Class C Notes and the Class D Notes (other than the EVI) will be sold in one or more private placements or retained initially by the depositor or its affiliate. The certificates are not being offered by this prospectus and will be retained initially by the depositor or an affiliate. The depositor or its affiliate will retain the right to sell all or a portion of such Class C Notes, such Class D Notes and the certificates (other than those held by the depositor or a majority-owned affiliate of the sponsor as part of the EVI) in one or more private placements at any time. The depositor or a majority-owned affiliate will initially hold the EVI. For a description of the EVI, see “Credit Risk Retention” in this prospectus.

THE RECEIVABLES POOL

Each receivable to be held by the issuing entity is classified as a simple interest receivable.

Payments pursuant to a simple interest receivable are allocated between finance charges and principal based on the actual date on which a payment is received. Late payments, or early payments, on a simple interest receivable may result in the obligor making a greater- or smaller-number of payments than originally scheduled. The amount of additional payments required to pay the outstanding principal balance in full generally will not exceed the amount of an originally scheduled payment. If an obligor elects to prepay a simple interest receivable in full, the obligor will not receive a rebate attributable to unearned finance charges. Instead, the obligor is required to pay finance charges only to, but not including, the date of prepayment.

Criteria Applicable to the Selection of Receivables

The pool of receivables to be sold to the trust was selected from Ally Bank’s portfolio based on several criteria, including that each receivable:

• is secured by a new or used car or light truck,

• is a simple interest receivable,

• was originated in the United States,

• provides for level monthly payments that may vary from one another by no more than $5,

• will amortize the amount financed over its original term to maturity,

• was originated or acquired by Ally Bank or its subsidiaries in the ordinary course of business,

• has a first payment due date on or after July 1, 2011,

• was originated on or after May 20, 2011,

30

• has an original term of 9 to 75 monthly payments,

• has a remaining term of not less than 3 monthly payments,

• as of the cutoff date, was not considered past due; that is, the payments due on that receivable in excess of $25 have been received within 30 days of the payment date, and

• has an APR of not greater than 18.00%.

The receivables in the pool of receivables on the closing date will be the same receivables that comprised the pool of receivables on the cutoff date.

The pool of receivables was selected from Ally Bank’s portfolio of receivables that meet the criteria described above and other administrative criteria utilized by Ally Bank from time to time. We believe that no selection procedures adverse to the noteholders were utilized in selecting the receivables in this pool of receivables. Ally Bank, as sponsor, incurred minimal internal expenses in selecting the pool of receivables. Ally Bank did not incur any third party expenses in connection with the selection of the pool of receivables.

The following tables describe the pool of receivables as of the cutoff date.

Each of the percentages and averages in the tables is computed on the basis of the amount financed of each receivable as of the cutoff date. The “Weighted Average Annual Percentage Rate of all Receivables in Pool” and “Weighted Average Annual Percentage Rate of Non-Subvented Receivables in Pool” in the following table are based on weighting by amount financed and remaining term of each receivable, each as of the cutoff date. The “Weighted Average Original Maturity” in the following table is based on weighting by original undiscounted principal balance of each receivable as of its date of origination. “Loan-to-Value Ratio” with respect to a receivable means the original undiscounted principal balance divided by the estimated vehicle value, multiplied by 100. The estimated vehicle value for a new vehicle is the dealer invoice cost of the vehicle. The estimated vehicle value for a used vehicle is the value received by Ally Financial or Ally Bank from the dealer, independently validated by Ally Financial or Ally Bank, based on a market guide, such as Blackbook, indicating the value of the vehicle and the source from which that value was determined. “Weighted Average Loan-to-Value Ratio” is based on a weighting by original undiscounted principal balance of each receivable as of its date of origination. A FICO score is a measurement designed by Fair, Isaac & Company and calculated by the major credit bureaus using collected information to assess credit risk. “Weighted Average FICO Score” is based on a weighting by original undiscounted principal balance of each receivable as of the cutoff date and excludes receivables with respect to which the obligor is a business account and receivables for which no FICO score is available. Of the 9,179 FICO scores excluded from the Weighted Average FICO Score, 8,573 or 93.40%, are business accounts and the remaining 606 or 6.60%, are accounts for which FICO scores are unavailable. In the table “Distribution of the Receivables Pool by FICO Score,” those excluded accounts make up the “Business Accounts and Unavailable” category. Percentages may not equal 100.00% due to rounding.

31

Composition of the Receivables Pool—(Total: New and Used)

Aggregate Amount Financed	$	1,119,773,433.38
Number of Contracts in Pool		69,471
Average Amount Financed	$	16,118.57
Weighted Average FICO Score		737.09
Weighted Average Loan-to-Value Ratio		94.21
Weighted Average Annual Percentage Rate of all Receivables in Pool		5.88%
Weighted Average Annual Percentage Rate of Non-Subvented Receivables in Pool		5.96%
Discount Rate Applied to Receivables in Pool with Annual Percentage Rates at or below		0.00%
Weighted Average Original Maturity (in months)		66.13
Weighted Average Remaining Maturity (in months) (Range)		52.68
		(3 to 74 Months)
Percentage of New Cars and Light Trucks in Pool		70.02%
Percentage of Used Cars and Light Trucks in Pool		29.98%
Percentage of Cars in Pool		31.22%
Percentage of Light Trucks in Pool		68.78%
Percentage of Subvented Receivables in Pool		2.50%
Percentage of Non-Subvented Receivables in Pool		97.50%

Composition of the Receivables Pool—(New)

Aggregate Amount Financed	$	784,067,709.19
Number of Contracts in Pool		40,578
Average Amount Financed	$	19,322.48
Weighted Average FICO Score		744.37
Weighted Average Loan-to-Value Ratio		88.18
Weighted Average Annual Percentage Rate of all Receivables in Pool		5.26%
Weighted Average Annual Percentage Rate of Non-Subvented Receivables in Pool		5.35%
Weighted Average Original Maturity (in months)		65.82
Weighted Average Remaining Maturity (in months) (Range)		53.00
		(3 to 74 Months)
Percentage of Subvented Receivables in Pool		3.50%
Percentage of Non-Subvented Receivables in Pool		96.50%

Composition of the Receivables Pool—(Used)

Aggregate Amount Financed	$	335,705,724.19
Number of Contracts in Pool		28,893
Average Amount Financed	$	11,618.93
Weighted Average FICO Score		721.89
Weighted Average Loan-to-Value Ratio		108.90
Weighted Average Annual Percentage Rate of all Receivables in Pool		7.38%
Weighted Average Annual Percentage Rate of Non-Subvented Receivables in Pool		7.38%
Weighted Average Original Maturity (in months)		66.89
Weighted Average Remaining Maturity (in months) (Range)		51.95
		(3 to 74 Months)
Percentage of Subvented Receivables in Pool		0.14%
Percentage of Non-Subvented Receivables in Pool		99.86%

32

Distribution of the Receivables Pool by Annual Percentage Rate—Aggregate

Annual Percentage Rate Range	Number of Contracts		Aggregate Amount Financed		Percentage of Aggregate Amount Financed
0.00% to 1.00%		2,188	$	24,002,778.51		2.14%
1.01% to 2.00%		283	$	3,487,139.11		0.31%
2.01% to 3.00%		8,161	$	142,123,125.14		12.69%
3.01% to 4.00%		11,841	$	203,436,277.26		18.17%
4.01% to 5.00%		10,786	$	174,599,348.76		15.59%
5.01% to 6.00%		9,820	$	159,982,516.73		14.29%
6.01% to 7.00%		7,670	$	126,850,724.30		11.33%
7.01% to 8.00%		6,197	$	96,679,202.21		8.63%
8.01% to 9.00%		4,461	$	70,886,858.80		6.33%
9.01% to 10.00%		3,125	$	47,951,310.77		4.28%
10.01% to 11.00%		2,133	$	32,280,059.54		2.88%
11.01% to 12.00%		1,384	$	19,947,211.10		1.78%
12.01% to 13.00%		758	$	9,879,786.59		0.88%
13.01% to 14.00%		386	$	4,757,178.45		0.42%
14.01% to 15.00%		179	$	1,962,216.15		0.18%
15.01% to 16.00%		67	$	661,653.00		0.06%
16.01% to 17.00%		27	$	240,694.10		0.02%
17.01% to 18.00%		5	$	45,352.86		0.00%
Total		69,471	$	1,119,773,433.38		100.00%

Distribution of the Receivables Pool by State

The pool of receivables includes receivables originated in all 50 states and the District of Columbia. The following table sets forth the percentage of the aggregate amount financed in the states with the largest concentration of receivables. No other state accounts for more than 3.78% of the aggregate amount financed. Management believes that there are no factors unique to any state or region in which 10% or more of the receivables are located that may materially impact the trust’s ability to pay principal and interest on the notes. The following breakdown by state is based on the billing addresses of the obligors on the receivables:

State	Percentage of Aggregate         Amount  Financed
Texas		13.50%
California		9.48%
Florida		9.28%
Pennsylvania		4.57%
Illinois		4.28%
Georgia		4.16%

33

Distribution of the Receivables Pool by Loan-to-Value Ratio

Loan-to-Value Ratio	Number of Contracts		Average Original Amount Financed		Average Original Estimated Vehicle Value		Percentage of Contracts
Less than 80		19,663	$	21,333.25	$	35,040.64		28.30%
80 to 90		10,471	$	25,392.59	$	29,820.56		15.07%
91 to 100		11,018	$	26,176.85	$	27,417.02		15.86%
101 to 110		9,728	$	25,844.67	$	24,575.22		14.00%
111 to 120		6,941	$	23,301.75	$	20,238.33		9.99%
121 to 130		5,357	$	20,752.84	$	16,558.90		7.71%
131 to 140		3,590	$	18,985.40	$	14,069.86		5.17%
141 to 150		1,980	$	16,645.08	$	11,474.44		2.85%
Greater than 150		723	$	13,551.03	$	8,664.18		1.04%
Total		69,471						100.00%

Distribution of the Receivables Pool by FICO Score

FICO Band	Number of Contracts		Aggregate Amount Financed			Percentage of Aggregate Amount Financed
Business Accounts and Unavailable		9,179		$	133,078,679.46		11.88%
Less than 650		—		$	—		—
651 - 675		9,084		$	146,797,942.54		13.11%
676 - 700		12,470		$	197,009,930.35		17.59%
701 - 725		9,582		$	155,710,999.12		13.91%
726 - 750		7,026		$	117,638,776.00		10.51%
751 - 775		5,109		$	86,969,950.84		7.77%
776 - 800		5,190		$	88,690,413.24		7.92%
801 -825		6,628		$	110,036,708.27		9.83%
826 - 850		4,192		$	67,955,705.45		6.07%
851 - 875		920		$	14,418,391.13		1.29%
876 - 900		91		$	1,465,936.98		0.13%
Total		69,471		$	1,119,773,433.38		100.00%

Distribution of the Receivables Pool by Original Term

Original Term (Months)	Number of Contracts		Aggregate Amount Financed			Percentage of Aggregate Amount Financed
60 and less		25,679		$	366,721,797.59		32.75%
61 to 72		34,005		$	620,215,989.10		55.39%
73 to 75		9,787		$	132,835,646.69		11.86%
Total		69,471		$	1,119,773,433.38		100.00%

34

Distribution of the Receivables Pool by Vehicle Make

Vehicle Make	Percentage of Aggregate Amount Financed
Chevrolet		33.35%
GMC		9.42%
Ford		8.40%
Jeep		7.59%
Ram		6.02%
Nissan		4.20%
Dodge		4.08%
Kia		3.64%
Toyota		3.60%
Hyundai		3.28%

No other vehicle make accounts for more than 2.97% of the aggregate amount financed.

Distribution of the Receivables Pool by Vehicle Model

Vehicle Model	Percentage of Aggregate Amount Financed
Silverado		11.31%
Sierra		4.63%
Ram Pickup		4.57%
Equinox		3.53%
Grand Cherokee		2.96%
Cruze		2.75%
Malibu		2.59%
Wrangler		2.18%
Express		1.93%
Traverse		1.80%

No other vehicle model accounts for more than 1.51% of the aggregate amount financed.

Depositor Review of the Receivables Pool

The depositor is required to perform a review (the “pool review”) of the pool of receivables in order to provide reasonable assurance that the information contained in this prospectus regarding the pool of receivables is accurate in all material respects. The pool review entailed consideration of ongoing processes and procedures used by Ally Financial and Ally Bank (the “process review”), as well as the performance of specified actions with respect to disclosure about the pool of receivables and the underlying data on which that disclosure was based (the “data and disclosure review”). For certain aspects of the pool review, the depositor engaged a third party to assist. The depositor designed the procedures used in the pool review, assumes the responsibility for the sufficiency of those procedures and attributes to itself all findings and conclusions of the pool review.

For the process review, the depositor monitored internal reports and developments with respect to processes and procedures that are designed to maintain and enhance the quality of decision-making, the quality of originated assets and the accuracy, efficiency and reliability of receivables systems and operations. Ally Financial and Ally Bank have internal functions that carry out these processes and procedures, such as:

35

• Quality assurance, which tests previously originated receivables to check for compliance with applicable underwriting criteria and documentation requirements and accurate entry of data into the principal databases and other management information systems of the sponsor and the servicer (the “information databases”),

• Contract review, which tests, among other things, the quality of originated portfolios and the adherence of originations to established policies,

• Risk reporting, which monitors losses, delinquencies, credit quality and exceptions to servicing policies, and

• Internal audit, which independently performs periodic internal control reviews of various processes including the auto contract origination and reporting system processes.

The first part of the data and disclosure review tested the accuracy of the individual receivables data contained in the information databases. The depositor uses the information databases to assemble an electronic data tape containing relevant data on the receivables pool. From this tape, the depositor constructs the pool composition and stratification tables in “The Receivables Pool” in this prospectus, prepares the information disclosed on Form ABS-EE, as further described in “Asset-Level Data for the Receivables” in this prospectus, verifies the eligibility criteria in “The Receivables Pool—Criteria Applicable to the Selection of Receivables” in this prospectus and validates the representations and warranties in “The Transfer Agreements and the Servicing Agreements—Sale and Assignment of Receivables” in this prospectus.

Through random processes, 185 receivables (the “reviewed receivables”) from the pool were selected. The servicer and the sponsor made available an electronic copy of the pertinent underlying documentation and data records for each reviewed receivable (collectively, the “receivable document file”).

First, approximately 32 different aspects, or data points, of each receivable document file, including values such as FICO score, origination date, APR and loan-to-value ratio, along with elements such as evidence of a perfected lien, were noted. These data points were either compared to the corresponding information in the electronic data tape or evaluated for compliance with an eligibility criterion or a representation and warranty, to determine whether any inaccuracies existed. In some cases, the depositor specified permissible tolerances for variances. Of the approximately 5,290 aggregate data points checked, two data points appeared to be erroneous related to two receivables. One error related to the scheduled payment amount per the contract exceeding the scheduled payment per the data tape by approximately $1.76. The other error related to the payment date on the contract being one day later than the payment date on the data tape.

In addition, selected values associated with the reviewed receivables were recomputed to assess their accuracy. The servicer provided records regarding payments made by the related obligors prior to the cutoff date so that the amount financed and remaining term for each reviewed receivable could be recomputed. Based on information in the receivable document file, the loan-to-value ratio for the related financed vehicle was also recomputed. These recomputations did not indicate any errors.

A second aspect of the data and disclosure review consisted of a comparison of the statistics contained in “The Receivables Pool” in this prospectus and the data related to the reviewed receivables disclosed on

Form ABS-EE to data in, or derived from, the information databases. The review consisted of a recalculation from the data in the information databases of the number of contracts, monetary amounts, amounts and percentages displayed in “The Receivables Pool” in this prospectus. Matters not exceeding plus or minus 0.5 percent of the number of contracts, monetary amounts, amounts or percentages were not considered exceptions. This comparison found no exceptions within the specified parameters.

The third aspect of the data and disclosure review evaluated the information contained in this prospectus regarding the pool of receivables under “Acquisition and Underwriting,” “The Receivables Pool,” “Servicing Procedures,” “The Transfer Agreements and the Servicing Agreements—Sale and Assignment of Receivables” and

36

“Legal Aspects of the Receivables.” The depositor confirmed with the responsible personnel of the sponsor and the servicer that the description of the business practices, contract terms and legal and regulatory considerations, and the other information with respect to the pool of receivables, contained in those sections is accurate. The depositor also reviewed internal management reports periodically generated by these personnel that bear on the matters discussed in those sections of this prospectus.

The depositor has concluded that the findings of the pool review provide it with reasonable assurance that:

• the errors identified in the first aspect of the data and disclosure review are not indicative of any systemic problems with the processes of the sponsor and the servicer that generate information regarding the receivables for use in this prospectus;

• the pool composition and stratification tables contained in this prospectus are accurate in all material respects;

• the pool of receivables satisfies the selection criteria and the representations and warranties in all material respects; and

• the disclosure regarding the pool of receivables contained in this prospectus is accurate in all material respects.

Exceptions to Underwriting Guidelines

A small number of receivables in the pool of receivables constitute exceptions to the underwriting criteria of Ally Bank, as described in “Acquisition and Underwriting—Underwriting Exceptions” in this prospectus. Ally Bank monitors exceptions to the underwriting criteria, with the goals of limiting exceptions to a small portion of approved applications and rarely permitting more than a single exception for any contract. The depositor elected to include these receivables in the pool of receivables for the offering. These receivables were included in the pool on the basis that the depositor has historically securitized receivables with these characteristics and these exceptions are immaterial.

When deciding whether to approve an application, the credit underwriter reviews all of the factors related to the receivable and typically will not approve an application unless the credit underwriter also determines that compensating factors, such as a co-obligor, a lower loan-to-value ratio or a shorter loan term, mitigate the exception. As a result of the sponsor’s use of a credit underwriter to make the determination of whether to approve an application based on all of the characteristics of the receivable taken together, the credit underwriter does not identify the specific characteristics that caused him or her to approve an application and therefore the sponsor does not have the ability to track or disclose the specific compensating factors related to each receivable.

The following table explains the nature of the exceptions. None of the 1,813 receivables that exceeded a single underwriting criterion had two “layered” exceptions. As used in the table below, a “collateral characteristic” is an underwriting criterion primarily related to the financed vehicle, such as loan-to-value ratio (“Loan-to-Value Ratio”) or, for used vehicles, a limit on the maximum mileage or age of the vehicle (“Vehicle Characteristic”), and a “credit characteristic” is an underwriting criterion primarily related to the creditworthiness of the obligor, such as credit score related exceptions (“Related to Credit Score”), exceptions based on the payment-to-income ratio or debt-to-income ratio (“Payment Amount”) or other factors related to the creditworthiness of the obligor (“Other Factors Related to the Creditworthiness of the Obligor”). The aggregate amount financed of these exception receivables is $21,583,171.96.

37

Nature of Exception	Number of Contracts		Percentage of Aggregate Amount Financed
Collateral: Loan-to-Value Ratio		807		1.01%
Collateral: Vehicle Characteristic		822		0.74%
Credit: Related to Credit Score		3		0.01%
Credit: Payment Amount		112		0.12%
Credit: Other Factors Related to the Creditworthiness of the Obligor		69		0.05%
Total		1,813		1.93%

Asset Representations Review

The asset representations reviewer will conduct a review of 60 day or more delinquent receivables for their compliance with asset level representations and warranties provided by the sponsor and the depositor upon the satisfaction of each of the following conditions:

• the delinquency trigger (as defined below) is met or exceeded, and

• the noteholders (including beneficial owners of the notes) vote to cause a review of delinquent receivables by:

• at least 5% of the noteholders, measured by the outstanding principal balance of their respective notes, demanding a vote of the noteholders to determine if a review should be performed, and

• at least a majority of the noteholders, measured by the outstanding principal balance of the notes of the noteholders voting, choosing to initiate an asset representations review, and at least 5% of the noteholders by aggregate principal balance of the notes outstanding cast a vote.

For more information regarding the asset representations reviewer, see “Asset Representations Reviewer” in this prospectus.

Asset Representations Review Delinquency Trigger

A “delinquent receivable” is a receivable for which payment of the required payment amount within $25 has not been received by the servicer by the payment due date as of the end of the monthly period. Charged off receivables are not considered delinquent receivables and therefore are not included in the delinquency trigger calculation. The sponsor does not treat a charged off receivable as delinquent because the related vehicle is no longer in the possession of the obligor and any loss would have been realized.

The “delinquency trigger” is calculated as a percentage equivalent of a fraction, the numerator of which is equal to the aggregate amount financed of 61 day or more delinquent receivables and the denominator of which is equal to the aggregate amount financed of all outstanding receivables, measured as of the end of the monthly period.

The following table sets forth the delinquency trigger applicable to each monthly period:

Monthly Period	Delinquency Trigger
1 to 12		1.25%
13 to 24		2.10%
25 to 36		1.80%
37 to 48		2.20%
49 and after		2.25%

The sponsor believes that the delinquency trigger is appropriate based on an analysis of the historical 61 day or more delinquency rate over the life of the sponsor’s other transactions. For each of the 27 registered and selected private offerings of notes backed by retail instalment sale contracts completed by the sponsor from 2009 to 2016, the sponsor calculated a maximum delinquency ratio for each annual period and then calculated this ratio for

38

each annual period from the related cutoff date. The maximum of the maximum delinquency ratio was utilized to account for typical seasonal increases in delinquencies. The sponsor then multiplied this historical delinquency maximum by four times and rounded to the nearest 0.05% to derive the delinquency trigger for each annual period. Because the sponsor’s other transactions have not experienced significant historical delinquencies and given the relatively stable economic period for these transactions, the multiple is intended to account for future volatility and stressed economic conditions. Based on its experience in historical transactions, the sponsor believes that this method will incorporate shifts in delinquencies for each annual period that the notes are outstanding and will align the delinquency trigger with changes in delinquency rates. Additionally, the four times multiple is expected to generate a delinquency trigger which would be met before any losses on the notes would occur. The chart below compares the delinquency trigger to the delinquency statistics for prior securitized pools.

39

AART 2018-1 Asset Representations Review:

Delinquency Trigger

For more information regarding 61 day or more delinquent asset statistics for the sponsor’s prior securitized pools, see “Appendix A—Static Pool Data” in this prospectus.

The servicer will monitor delinquent receivables and will include on the monthly statement to securityholders the percentage of receivables that are delinquent in each monthly period in 30 or 31 day increments up to 120 days and whether the delinquency trigger has been met or exceeded for the related monthly period. If the delinquency trigger has been met or exceeded for the related monthly period, the servicer will provide a notice to the sponsor, the depositor and the indenture trustee, and will include a notice on the monthly servicer report and on the Form 10-D, that such trigger has been met or exceeded.

Voting

Within 90 days of publication that the delinquency trigger has been met or exceeded in the monthly statement to securityholders on Form 10-D, the noteholders may determine whether to initiate a vote to determine whether a review of 60 day or more delinquent receivables should be performed by the asset representations reviewer. Noteholders may exercise this right by contacting the indenture trustee. For the purpose of the vote, notes held by the sponsor or any affiliates thereof are not included in the calculation of determining whether the noteholders have elected to initiate a vote.

If the requesting noteholder is the record holder of any notes, no verification procedures will be required. If the requesting noteholder is not the record holder of any notes and is instead a beneficial owner of notes, the indenture trustee may require no more verification than (1) a written certification from the noteholder that it is a beneficial owner of a specified principal balance of the notes and (2) an additional form of documentation, such as a trade confirmation, an account statement, a letter from the broker or dealer or other similar document. If less than 5% of the noteholders by aggregate principal balance of the notes demand that a review be initiated within 90 days of publication of the delinquency trigger being met, no additional vote will be required and no asset representations review will be conducted.

If at least 5% of the noteholders by aggregate principal balance of the notes outstanding demand that a vote be conducted, the indenture trustee will post a notice through The Depository Trust Company (“DTC”), initiating a vote of all the noteholders. On the Form 10-D related to the monthly period in which the noteholders demand that a vote be conducted, the issuing entity will disclose the voting procedures that will be used and how to cast a vote. The noteholders will be allowed to vote for at least 150 days after the initial Form 10-D including disclosure that the trigger has been met or exceeded is filed. The votes will be tabulated by either the indenture trustee in the capacity

40

of tabulation agent or by a third party acting as tabulation agent (in each case, the “Vote Tabulation Agent”). If at the end of that 150-day period, at least a majority of the noteholders by aggregate principal balance of the notes who have voted choose to approve initiating the asset representations review and at least 5% of the noteholders by aggregate principal balance of the notes outstanding cast a vote, the asset representations reviewer will be notified to conduct a review as set forth below under “—The Asset Representations Review Process.”

The Asset Representations Review Process

Upon the approval of the noteholders as set forth above under “—Voting,” the issuing entity will instruct the servicer and the custodian to provide the asset representations reviewer with access to copies of documents necessary to perform its review within 60 days of the conclusion of the vote approving the review. The asset representations reviewer will then conduct its review of all receivables 60 days or more delinquent as of the end of the most recent monthly period. The asset representations reviewer will compare such delinquent receivables to the asset level representations and warranties provided by the sponsor on the closing date with respect to the receivables. The related representations and warranties are measured as of the time of origination, the cutoff date or the closing date as specified in the pooling agreement. For a description of the representations and warranties the asset representations reviewer will review, see “—Criteria Applicable to the Selection of Receivables” and “The Transfer Agreements and The Servicing Agreements—Sale and Assignment of Receivables” in this prospectus. A copy of the final asset representations review agreement will be filed no later than the date of the filing of the final prospectus for the notes.

The asset representations reviewer will only determine whether:

• a receivable sold on the closing date satisfied the asset level representations and warranties,

• a receivable failed to satisfy such representations or warranties, or

• there is missing or insufficient documentation with respect to whether a representation or warranty was satisfied.

The asset representations reviewer will not determine whether any failures to meet the representations and warranties resulted in breaches of the representations and warranties or whether the sponsor or the depositor would be required to repurchase any such receivables. Additionally, the asset representations reviewer will not determine the reason for the delinquency of any receivable, the creditworthiness of any obligor, the overall quality of any receivable or the compliance of the servicer with its covenants with respect to the servicing of the receivables. If a receivable is paid off, satisfied, substituted or repurchased due to a breach of a covenant, representation or warranty, the asset representations reviewer will not review that receivable.

The fees and expenses of the asset representations review will be paid by the issuing entity from monthly collections on the receivables. See “The Notes—Distributions.” The review fee will be $200 per receivable.

The asset representations reviewer will be required to complete its review within 60 days of receiving the documents necessary to start its review. The review period may be extended by up to an additional 30 days if the asset representations reviewer requests missing review materials that are subsequently provided within the 60-day period or requires clarification of any review materials or testing procedures. If any requested missing information is not provided to the asset representations reviewer, the asset representations reviewer will consider the affected test to be failed due to missing or insufficient documentation. The asset representations reviewer will provide the indenture trustee, the sponsor, the depositor and the servicer with a detailed report of its findings within 30 days of completing its review. A summary of the asset representations reviewer’s report will be included in the statement to securityholders on the Form 10-D for the monthly period in which that summary report was provided. A noteholder will have the right to request a copy of the detailed report of the findings from the sponsor.

The sponsor and the depositor will evaluate the asset representations reviewer’s report and any repurchase request received from the indenture trustee, any noteholder or any party to the transaction documents in order to determine whether a repurchase of a receivable is required. After reviewing the report, the sponsor and the depositor

41

will determine if there were breaches of the representations and warranties, and the sponsor and the depositor will then decide whether to repurchase the receivable. None of the indenture trustee, the owner trustee, the asset representations reviewer or the servicer is otherwise obligated to investigate the accuracy of the representations and warranties with respect to the receivables subject to the asset representations review. The transaction documents require that any breach of the representations and warranties must materially and adversely affect the interest of the noteholders or the certificateholders before the sponsor or the depositor would be required to repurchase such receivables. Any noteholder, however, will be entitled to make a repurchase request regarding a breach of the representations and warranties related to a receivable to the indenture trustee. The sponsor or the depositor will report any repurchase request received from a noteholder, the indenture trustee or the owner trustee, and the disposition of the request, on a Form ABS-15G that will be filed with the SEC. For more information regarding the exercise of rights by the indenture trustee, see “The Indenture Trustee.”

Dispute Resolution

The depositor, the sponsor, the owner trustee, the servicer, the indenture trustee or any noteholder may, upon discovery of a breach of a representation or warranty related to a receivable made by the depositor or the sponsor in the transaction documents, which materially and adversely affects the interest of the depositor, the sponsor, the owner trustee, the servicer, the indenture trustee or the certificateholders in the related receivable, or in the case of a noteholder (including a beneficial owner of the notes), which results in that noteholder not being made whole, demand that the depositor or the sponsor repurchase the related receivable from the trust. In order to make a repurchase demand, a noteholder will be required to provide a notice to the indenture trustee. If any such party provides sufficient notice as provided in the transaction documents within the applicable statute of limitations period of an alleged breach of a representation or warranty with respect to a receivable made by the depositor or the sponsor in the transaction documents, and the sponsor or the depositor fails to resolve such request within 180 days of receipt, the requesting party has the right to refer the matter to a dispute resolution process described below. This right applies to all repurchase requests made in accordance with the transaction documents and is not limited to repurchase requests made in connection with a review pursuant to the asset representations review process described under “—Asset Representations Review—The Asset Representations Review Process.” This right is not a mechanism for requesting repurchase or other relief from losses resulting from changes in the credit quality of the receivable or other market conditions. The sponsor or the depositor will not repurchase a receivable with respect to which the related breach of a representation or warranty did not result in a material and adverse effect on the interests of the noteholders and the certificateholders taken as a whole. Each notice must be given in writing to the other parties in accordance with the transaction documents and must specifically identify the receivable to be repurchased and specify the representations or warranties allegedly breached. The notice must also identify the alleged loss related to the receivable and the material adverse effect on the requesting party. General allegations relating to the entire pool of receivables or an unspecified subset of the pool are not a sufficient description for purposes of the notice. If a receivable is paid off, satisfied, substituted or repurchased, no demands to repurchase are permitted, and there is no further right to mediation or arbitration regarding that receivable. None of the representations and warranties related to the receivables relate to the performance of the receivables or to any credit losses that may occur as a result of a default by the related obligor on the receivable. Furthermore, the dispute resolution procedures described below apply only to the specific receivables that are related to the dispute. In order for a receivable to be subject to repurchase, there must be a breach of a representation or warranty related to such receivable which materially and adversely affects the requesting party. In the event that the asset representations reviewer determines that the representations and warranties related to a receivable have not failed, any repurchase request related to that receivable will be deemed to be resolved.

The requesting party may choose either mediation (including non-binding arbitration) or third-party binding arbitration at its discretion. In each case, the process will be administrated by the American Arbitration Association (“AAA”) pursuant to the AAA’s Commercial Arbitration Rules and Mediation Procedures, as applicable, or any successor rules or procedures (the “AAA Rules”). The mediation or arbitration will take place in New York, New York. The indenture trustee, after direction from the depositor, will notify the requesting party at the end of the 180-day period if a repurchase demand is unresolved. Within 30 days of the delivery of the notice indicating that a repurchase demand has not been resolved following the end of the 180-day period, the requesting party must initiate the proceedings and provide notice (as defined by the AAA Rules) to the sponsor and the depositor of its intent to pursue resolution through mediation or arbitration at securitization@ally.com. The sponsor

42

or the depositor must respond to the notice within 30 days and must submit to the method of dispute resolution requested.

If the requesting party chooses to refer the matter to mediation, the sponsor or depositor and the requesting party will agree on a neutral mediator approved by the AAA within 15 days of notice service. If the parties cannot agree on a mediator, one will be appointed by the AAA in accordance with the applicable AAA Rules. For a mediation, the proceeding will start within 15 days after the selection of the mediator and conclude within 30 days after the start of the mediation. The parties will mutually agree on the allocation of expenses incurred in connection with the mediation. If the requesting party is unsatisfied with the result of the mediation, the requesting party may choose to submit the matter to binding arbitration or adjudicate the dispute in court.

If the requesting party chooses to refer the matter to binding arbitration, the matter will be referred to a panel of three arbitrators. The panel will be comprised of one arbitrator appointed by the requesting party, one arbitrator appointed by the depositor and a third arbitrator appointed by the two arbitrators that are appointed by the requesting party and the depositor, in each case selected in accordance with the transaction documents. The sponsor and the depositor will provide a notice of the commencement of any arbitration on the Form 10-D related to the monthly period in which the arbitration proceeding commences and will give other noteholders or parties to the transaction documents the right to participate in the arbitration proceeding. The arbitrator will have the authority to schedule, hear and determine any motions, including dispositive and discovery motions, according to New York law, and will do so at the motion of any party. Discovery will be completed within 30 days of appointment of the panel and will be limited for each party to two witness depositions not to exceed five hours, two interrogatories, one document request and one request for admissions. The arbitrator, however, may grant additional discovery on a showing of good cause that the additional discovery is reasonable and necessary. Briefs will be limited to no more than ten pages each, and will be limited to initial statements of the case, discovery motions and a pre-hearing brief. The evidentiary hearing on the merits will commence no later than 60 days following the appointment of the panel and will proceed for no more than 10 consecutive business days, with equal time allotted to each side for the presentation of direct evidence and cross examination. The panel will render its decision on the matter within 90 days of the selection of the panel. In each case, the panel will have discretion to modify these timeframes if, based on the facts and circumstances of the particular dispute, good cause exists, there is an unavoidable delay or with the consent of all of the relevant parties. The panel will decide the matter in accordance with the terms of the contract, including choice-of-law provisions, and will not be permitted to award punitive or special damages. The panel will also determine which party will be responsible for paying the dispute resolution fees, including attorneys’ fees, incurred in this process. Judgment on the award will be entered in any court having jurisdiction. Once the representations and warranties with respect to a receivable have been reviewed by a panel, the panel’s decision will be binding with respect to that receivable, and such receivable may not be the subject of any additional mediation or binding arbitration. By selecting binding arbitration, the requesting party will be giving up its right to adjudicate the dispute in court, including the right to a trial by jury.

In all cases, the proceedings of the mediation or binding arbitration, including the occurrence of such proceedings, the nature and amount of any relief sought or granted and the results of any discovery taken in the matter, will be kept strictly confidential by each of the parties to the dispute, except as necessary in connection with the investor communications and reports to securityholders described under “Reports to Securityholders” below, in connection with a judicial challenge to or enforcement of an award, or as otherwise required by law.

REPURCHASE HISTORY

The transaction documents contain covenants requiring the depositor and Ally Bank to repurchase a receivable for the breach of representation or warranty in certain circumstances. In the prior three years, none of Ally Bank, Ally Financial, the depositor, the indenture trustee or the owner trustee received a demand to repurchase any retail auto instalment sale contract securitized by Ally Bank or the depositor. The depositor, as a securitizer, discloses all demands to repurchase any retail auto instalment sale contract securitized by it on Form ABS-15G.

The depositor filed its most recent Form ABS-15G with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) on February 8, 2017. The depositor’s CIK number is 0001477336. For more information on obtaining a copy of the report, see “Where You Can Find More Information” in this prospectus.

43

ASSET-LEVEL DATA FOR THE RECEIVABLES

The depositor and the issuing entity have provided asset-level data for the receivables and filed this information on Form ABS-EE. Form ABS-EE is incorporated by reference into this prospectus. The asset-level data includes information about the receivables, the vehicles, the obligors, activity on the receivables, charge offs, repossessions and modifications of the receivables. Asset-level data will be provided each month as an exhibit to the monthly distribution reports filed on Form 10-D.

44

THE SPONSOR’S PORTFOLIO DATA

Delinquencies, Repossessions, Bankruptcies and Net Losses

For Ally Bank’s U.S. consumer automotive portfolio of new and used retail car and light truck receivables, the table on the following page shows Ally Bank’s experience for both new and used retail car and light truck receivables on a combined basis for:

• delinquencies,

• repossessions,

• bankruptcies, and

• net losses.

Fluctuations in delinquencies, repossessions, bankruptcies and net losses generally follow trends in the overall economic environment and may be affected by such factors as:

• competition for obligors,

• the supply and demand for both new and used cars and light trucks,

• consumer debt burden per household, and

• personal bankruptcies.

Ally Bank’s delinquencies and losses increased beginning in 2011 and continued through the third quarter of 2017. These increases are consistent with expectations and reflective of a growing asset base and a more balanced and profitable asset composition.

45

There can be no assurance that the delinquency, repossession, bankruptcy and net loss experience on the receivables will be comparable to that set forth below or that the factors or beliefs described above will remain applicable. For a description of how the sponsor defines a delinquent receivable, see “The Receivables Pool—Asset Representations Review—Asset Representations Review Delinquency Trigger.”

New and Used Car and Light Truck Contracts	Nine Months Ended September 30,						Year Ended December 31,
	2017			2016			2016			2015			2014			2013			2012
Total Retail Contracts Outstanding at the End of the Period (excluding bankruptcies) (in thousands)
New Vehicles (in thousands)		1,137			1,142			1,171			1,204			1,171			1,174			1,134
Used Vehicles (in thousands)		1,191			912			976			769			613			480			390
Total (in thousands)		2,328			2,054			2,147			1,973			1,784			1,654			1,524
Month-End Delinquency Dollars(1)
31-60 Days		1.48	%		0.98	%		1.26	%		0.89	%		0.80	%		0.69	%		0.58	%
61-90 Days		0.32	%		0.19	%		0.26	%		0.19	%		0.15	%		0.14	%		0.13	%
91-120 Days		0.08	%		0.04	%		0.06	%		0.03	%		0.03	%		0.03	%		0.02	%
121 Days or More		0.00	%		0.00	%		0.00	%		0.00	%		0.00	%		0.00	%		0.00	%
Repossessions as a Percent of Average Number of Contracts Outstanding (including bankruptcies)		1.60	%		1.07	%		1.15	%		0.84	%		0.77	%		0.66	%		0.51	%
Net Losses as a Percent of Liquidations		1.28	%		0.72	%		0.83	%		0.53	%		0.50	%		0.45	%		0.34	%
Net Losses as a Percent of Average Gross Receivables		0.56	%		0.34	%		0.39	%		0.27	%		0.26	%		0.23	%		0.16	%
Net Losses as a Percent of Average Net Receivables(2)		0.77	%		0.48	%		0.54	%		0.34	%		0.31	%		0.31	%		0.23	%
Total Retail Contracts Outstanding at End of the Period (including bankruptcies) (in thousands)		2,352			2,072			2,167			1,987			1,797			1,666			1,533
Bankruptcies as a Percent of Average Number of Contracts Outstanding (including bankruptcies)		0.95	%		0.82	%		0.84	%		0.72	%		0.69	%		0.64	%		0.52	%
Bankruptcies Month-End Delinquency Dollars—31 Days or More		0.24	%		0.19	%		0.22	%		0.16	%		0.14	%		0.15	%		0.12	%

(1)    Month-end delinquency dollars represent the remaining principal balance as of the ledger closing date for the month.

(2)    Net Losses as a Percent of Average Net Receivables is an accounting-based metric and, therefore, reflects write-downs that occur based on Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council guidance.

New and Used Car and Light Truck Contracts	Nine Months Ended September 30,				Year Ended December 31,
	2017		2016		2016		2015		2014		2013		2012
Average Bankruptcies		21,398		17,092		17,717		13,417		12,066		10,444		7,344
Average Retail Contracts (including bankruptcies)		2,249,767		2,090,493		2,100,781		1,869,607		1,741,445		1,620,298		1,414,851

Our current practice is generally to write off receivables, other than those with respect to which the related obligor is in bankruptcy, at the point amounts are deemed to be uncollectible or have been repossessed and sold. We will normally begin repossession activity once the receivable becomes 60 days past due. The “Month-End Delinquency Dollars” represent the remaining principal balance (adjusted for write downs) as of the ledger closing date for the month. The “Net Losses as a Percent of Liquidations” and the “Net Losses as a Percent of

46

Average Gross Receivables” percentages in the preceding table are based on the gross balance of the receivables, which includes unearned finance charges. Liquidations represent all reductions to the receivables based on cash receipts from all sources as well as charge-offs. The “Net Losses as a Percent of Average Net Receivables” percentages in the preceding table are based on the net balance of the receivables, which is the principal amount outstanding less unearned income. Unearned income, which includes unearned rate support received from an automotive manufacturer on certain automotive contracts and deferred origination fees reduced by origination costs, is amortized over the contractual life of the related receivable or retail instalment sale contract using the effective interest method. The “Bankruptcies as a Percent of Average Number of Contracts Outstanding (including bankruptcies)” percentages in the preceding table represent the number of bankruptcies on the last day of each month and averaged for the indicated period divided by the number of receivables outstanding on the last day of each month and averaged for the indicated period.

The “Repossessions as a Percent of Average Number of Contracts Outstanding (including bankruptcies),” “Net Losses as a Percent of Average Gross Receivables” and “Net Losses as a Percent of Average Net Receivables” for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2017 are reported as annualized rates, which may not reflect the actual annual results.

The “Net Losses as a Percent of Average Net Receivables” represent accounting write-downs net of recoveries on Ally Bank’s U.S. automotive portfolio of new and used retail car and light and medium duty truck receivables. Net losses include the initial write-down to estimated fair market value of all repossessed vehicles in the month of repossession, as well as accounts that are 120 days past due and bankruptcies that are 60 days past due and past notification.

The “Average Bankruptcies” is the number of receivables in bankruptcy outstanding on the last day of each month and averaged for the indicated period.

The “Average Retail Contracts (including bankruptcies)” is calculated by averaging the month-end retail contracts outstanding (including bankruptcies) for each month in the indicated period.

STATIC POOL INFORMATION

Information regarding publicly offered retail securitized pools acquired by Ally Bank within the preceding five years is included in Appendix A of this prospectus. This static pool information is incorporated by reference into this prospectus.

47

WEIGHTED AVERAGE LIFE OF THE OFFERED NOTES

The weighted average life of the notes will generally be influenced by the rate at which the principal balances of the receivables are paid, which payment may be in the form of scheduled amortization or prepayments. For this purpose, the term “prepayment” includes charge-offs, liquidations due to defaults and repurchases by the depositor or the seller or purchases by the servicer pursuant to the servicing agreement, as well as receipt of proceeds from credit life and casualty insurance policies. All of the receivables are prepayable at any time without penalty to the obligor. The rate of prepayment of automotive receivables is influenced by a variety of economic, social and other factors, including the fact that an obligor generally may not sell or transfer the financed vehicle securing a receivable without the consent of the servicer. Any reinvestment risk resulting from prepayment of receivables will be borne entirely by the holders of the notes. See also “Legal Aspects of the Receivables—Transfer of Vehicles” in this prospectus.

Prepayments on automotive receivables can be measured relative to a prepayment standard or model. The model used in this prospectus to present the projected weighted average life of the offered notes, the Absolute Prepayment Model, or “ABS,” assumes a rate of prepayment each month relative to the original number of receivables in a pool of receivables. ABS further assumes that all the receivables are uniform as to size and maturity and amortize at the same rate and that each receivable in each month of its life will either be paid as scheduled or be prepaid in full. For example, in a pool of receivables assumed to originally contain 10,000 uniform receivables, a 1% ABS rate means that 100 receivables prepay each month. ABS does not purport to be a historical description of prepayment experience or a prediction of the anticipated rate of prepayment of any pool of receivables, including the receivables owned by the trust.

As the rate of payment of principal of the notes will depend on the rate of payment, including prepayments, of the principal balance of the receivables, final payment of the offered notes could occur significantly earlier than the final scheduled distribution date for the offered notes.

The tables under the heading “—Percent of Initial Note Principal Balance Outstanding at Various ABS Percentages” have been prepared on the basis of indicated ABS percentages. The indicated ABS percentages have been applied to the hypothetical pool of receivables.

The “hypothetical pool of receivables” is a pool of receivables equal to those receivables owned by the issuing entity on the closing date. The table below represents a pool of receivables that have been further disaggregated into 50 smaller hypothetical pools having the characteristics set forth in the table below. The level scheduled monthly payment for each of the hypothetical pools is based on aggregate principal balance, annual percentage rate and remaining term to maturity as of the cutoff date such that each hypothetical pool set forth below will be fully amortized by the end of its remaining term to maturity.

Hypothetical Pool	Aggregate     Principal Balance		Annual   Percentage Rate	Weighted Average Remaining Term to   Maturity  (in Months)	Weighted Average   Age (in Months)
1	$	9,158,517.76	0.000%	13	48
2	$	7,826,393.22	0.000%	31	32
3	$	1,457,823.96	0.000%	43	24
4	$	3,462,867.04	0.000%	55	16
5	$	800,570.65	0.000%	63	9
6	$	510,495.21	0.905%	13	39
7	$	255,736.82	0.955%	32	35
8	$	181,465.58	0.981%	41	29
9	$	287,030.47	0.900%	57	15
10	$	61,877.80	0.900%	65	7
11	$	979,501.42	1.906%	14	43
12	$	617,818.79	1.940%	31	30
13	$	1,257,944.71	1.933%	44	19
14	$	489,416.08	1.939%	55	11

48

Hypothetical Pool	Aggregate     Principal Balance		Annual   Percentage Rate	Weighted Average Remaining Term to   Maturity  (in Months)	Weighted Average   Age (in Months)
15	$	142,458.11	1.914%	66	6
16	$	15,920,113.06	2.645%	17	38
17	$	22,472,608.74	2.654%	31	26
18	$	40,224,257.32	2.653%	44	17
19	$	54,365,537.97	2.814%	55	9
20	$	9,140,608.05	2.869%	64	6
21	$	19,096,687.16	3.707%	16	40
22	$	26,102,781.76	3.676%	31	25
23	$	40,328,436.59	3.674%	43	19
24	$	64,087,503.02	3.677%	55	11
25	$	53,820,868.73	3.622%	67	5
26	$	17,017,243.70	4.673%	17	41
27	$	19,908,551.73	4.663%	31	27
28	$	32,578,124.07	4.673%	43	21
29	$	52,763,722.27	4.705%	55	12
30	$	52,331,706.99	4.669%	67	5
31	$	9,058,567.87	5.567%	17	45
32	$	12,136,483.90	5.570%	31	28
33	$	26,914,975.34	5.572%	43	23
34	$	48,610,351.85	5.619%	55	13
35	$	63,262,137.77	5.641%	67	5
36	$	4,613,784.55	6.582%	17	47
37	$	6,848,019.09	6.553%	31	31
38	$	14,878,305.73	6.567%	43	22
39	$	35,412,971.62	6.578%	55	13
40	$	65,097,643.31	6.550%	68	4
41	$	3,049,032.21	7.511%	17	48
42	$	4,580,674.17	7.531%	32	27
43	$	9,217,873.27	7.531%	43	21
44	$	25,087,284.09	7.540%	56	12
45	$	54,744,338.47	7.524%	68	4
46	$	3,402,918.96	9.653%	18	45
47	$	8,060,432.71	9.913%	31	26
48	$	16,658,511.18	9.973%	43	19
49	$	45,058,109.69	9.933%	56	12
50	$	115,432,348.82	9.843%	68	4

In addition, the following assumptions have been used in preparing the tables below:

1. the receivables prepay in full at the specified constant percentage of ABS monthly, with no defaults, losses or repurchases,

2. each payment on the receivables is made on the last day of each month and each month has 30 days,

3. interest accrues on the notes at a per annum fixed rate for the Class A-1 Notes of 1.70000%, for the Class A-2 Notes of 2.08%, for the Class A-3 Notes of 2.31%, for the Class A-4 Notes of 2.51%, for the Class B Notes of 2.68%, for the Class C Notes of 2.83%, for the Class D Notes of 3.28% and none of the notes accrue interest at a floating rate,

4. interest accrues on the Class A-1 Notes on each distribution date based on the actual number of days elapsed during the period for which interest is payable and a 360-day year and interest accrues on the Class A-2 Notes, the Class A-3 Notes, the Class A-4 Notes, the Class B Notes, the

49

Class C Notes and the Class D Notes on each distribution date based on a 360-day year consisting of twelve 30-day months,

5. payments on the notes are made on each distribution date (and each distribution date is assumed to be the 15th day of each applicable month), commencing February 15, 2018,

6. except as indicated in the following tables, the servicer does not exercise its 10% clean-up call option to purchase the receivables,

7. the basic servicing fee is paid monthly and equals 1.00% per annum and all other fees, expenses and indemnities are equal to zero,

8. the closing date occurs on January 31, 2018, and

9. no event of default occurs.

The actual characteristics and performance of the receivables will differ from the assumptions used in constructing the following tables. The assumptions used are hypothetical and have been provided only to give a general sense of how the principal cash flows might behave under varying prepayment scenarios. Investors are urged to make their investment decisions on a basis that includes their determination as to anticipated prepayment rates under a variety of the assumptions discussed herein.

It is very unlikely that the receivables will prepay at a constant level of ABS until maturity or that all of receivables will prepay at the same level of ABS. Any difference between each of those assumptions and the actual characteristics and performance of the receivables, or actual prepayment experience, will affect the percentages of initial balances outstanding over time and the weighted average lives of the notes.

The following tables indicate the projected weighted average life of each class of notes and set forth the percent of the initial principal balance of each class of notes that is projected to be outstanding after each of the distribution dates shown at various constant ABS percentages.

50

Percent of Initial Note Principal Balance Outstanding at Various ABS Percentages

The weighted average life of each class of notes as set forth in each of the tables below is determined by (a) multiplying the amount of each principal payment on a note of that class by the number of years from the date of the issuance of the related note to the related distribution date, (b) adding the results, and (c) dividing the sum by the related initial principal balance of each class of notes. The calculation in the row in each of the tables below labeled “Weighted Average Life (Years) to Call” assumes that the servicer exercises its 10% clean-up call option to purchase the receivables on the earliest permissible date. The calculation in the row in each of the tables listed below labeled “Weighted Average Life (Years) to Maturity” assumes that the servicer does not exercise its 10% clean-up call option. If the servicer were to exercise its 10% clean-up call option, noteholders would receive all unpaid principal on their notes at the time of the call and each class of notes would cease to be outstanding.

Percent of the Initial Note Principal Balance Outstanding—Class A-1 Notes

Distribution Date	0.00%		0.50%		0.90%		1.10%		1.30%		1.50%		1.80%
Closing Date		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%
02/15/18		90.86%		88.77%		86.81%		85.69%		84.44%		82.99%		80.07%
03/15/18		82.04%		77.95%		74.13%		71.95%		69.52%		66.72%		61.10%
04/15/18		73.21%		67.22%		61.63%		58.46%		54.92%		50.86%		42.76%
05/15/18		64.54%		56.71%		49.43%		45.30%		40.71%		35.46%		25.07%
06/15/18		56.43%		46.87%		38.00%		32.99%		27.42%		21.08%		8.64%
07/15/18		48.29%		37.09%		26.73%		20.88%		14.42%		7.06%		0.00%
08/15/18		40.11%		27.37%		15.61%		8.99%		1.69%		0.00%		0.00%
09/15/18		31.90%		17.71%		4.64%		0.00%		0.00%		0.00%		0.00%
10/15/18		23.65%		8.11%		0.00%		0.00%		0.00%		0.00%		0.00%
11/15/18		15.37%		0.00%		0.00%		0.00%		0.00%		0.00%		0.00%
12/15/18		7.06%		0.00%		0.00%		0.00%		0.00%		0.00%		0.00%
01/15/19		0.00%		0.00%		0.00%		0.00%		0.00%		0.00%		0.00%
Weighted Average Life (Years) to Call		0.49		0.40		0.34		0.31		0.29		0.26		0.22
Weighted Average Life (Years) to Maturity		0.49		0.40		0.34		0.31		0.29		0.26		0.22

51

Percent of the Initial Note Principal Balance Outstanding—Class A-2 Notes

Distribution Date	0.00%		0.50%		0.90%		1.10%		1.30%		1.50%		1.80%
Closing Date		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%
02/15/18		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%
03/15/18		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%
04/15/18		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%
05/15/18		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%
06/15/18		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%
07/15/18		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		94.01%
08/15/18		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		94.53%		81.31%
09/15/18		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		97.76%		91.05%		83.48%		69.21%
10/15/18		100.00%		100.00%		94.86%		88.22%		80.93%		72.75%		57.69%
11/15/18		100.00%		98.81%		85.99%		78.85%		71.05%		62.34%		46.64%
12/15/18		100.00%		90.91%		77.25%		69.67%		61.40%		52.24%		36.07%
01/15/19		98.93%		83.07%		68.65%		60.66%		52.00%		42.45%		25.96%
02/15/19		91.95%		75.28%		60.17%		51.84%		42.85%		32.99%		16.23%
03/15/19		85.16%		67.74%		52.00%		43.35%		34.05%		23.91%		6.88%
04/15/19		78.36%		60.26%		43.97%		35.05%		25.49%		15.14%		0.00%
05/15/19		71.53%		52.83%		36.07%		26.92%		17.17%		6.67%		0.00%
06/15/19		65.03%		45.78%		28.57%		19.21%		9.27%		0.00%		0.00%
07/15/19		59.39%		39.56%		21.84%		12.23%		2.01%		0.00%		0.00%
08/15/19		53.79%		33.42%		15.26%		5.41%		0.00%		0.00%		0.00%
09/15/19		48.16%		27.33%		8.77%		0.00%		0.00%		0.00%		0.00%
10/15/19		42.50%		21.27%		2.38%		0.00%		0.00%		0.00%		0.00%
11/15/19		36.82%		15.25%		0.00%		0.00%		0.00%		0.00%		0.00%
12/15/19		31.12%		9.27%		0.00%		0.00%		0.00%		0.00%		0.00%
01/15/20		25.38%		3.33%		0.00%		0.00%		0.00%		0.00%		0.00%
02/15/20		19.62%		0.00%		0.00%		0.00%		0.00%		0.00%		0.00%
03/15/20		13.84%		0.00%		0.00%		0.00%		0.00%		0.00%		0.00%
04/15/20		8.03%		0.00%		0.00%		0.00%		0.00%		0.00%		0.00%
05/15/20		2.19%		0.00%		0.00%		0.00%		0.00%		0.00%		0.00%
06/15/20		0.00%		0.00%		0.00%		0.00%		0.00%		0.00%		0.00%
Weighted Average Life (Years) to Call		1.65		1.40		1.20		1.12		1.03		0.95		0.82
Weighted Average Life (Years) to Maturity		1.65		1.40		1.20		1.12		1.03		0.95		0.82

52

Percent of the Initial Note Principal Balance Outstanding—Class A-3 Notes

Distribution Date	0.00%		0.50%		0.90%		1.10%		1.30%		1.50%		1.80%
Closing Date		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%
02/15/18		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%
03/15/18		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%
04/15/18		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%
05/15/18		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%
06/15/18		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%
07/15/18		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%
08/15/18		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%
09/15/18		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%
10/15/18		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%
11/15/18		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%
12/15/18		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%
01/15/19		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%
02/15/19		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%
03/15/19		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%
04/15/19		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		97.93%
05/15/19		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		89.36%
06/15/19		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		98.63%		81.10%
07/15/19		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		91.10%		73.13%
08/15/19		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		94.95%		83.79%		65.43%
09/15/19		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		98.72%		88.06%		76.68%		58.00%
10/15/19		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		92.16%		81.32%		69.78%		50.85%
11/15/19		100.00%		100.00%		96.09%		85.73%		74.76%		63.08%		43.97%
12/15/19		100.00%		100.00%		89.90%		79.43%		68.36%		56.59%		37.36%
01/15/20		100.00%		100.00%		83.80%		73.27%		62.14%		50.32%		31.05%
02/15/20		100.00%		97.43%		77.81%		67.24%		56.08%		44.25%		25.03%
03/15/20		100.00%		91.57%		71.91%		61.34%		50.20%		38.39%		19.29%
04/15/20		100.00%		85.75%		66.12%		55.58%		44.49%		32.75%		13.82%
05/15/20		100.00%		79.97%		60.43%		49.96%		38.95%		27.33%		8.63%
06/15/20		96.33%		74.23%		54.84%		44.47%		33.59%		22.12%		3.73%
07/15/20		90.43%		68.53%		49.35%		39.12%		28.40%		17.13%		0.00%
08/15/20		84.52%		62.87%		43.97%		33.91%		23.39%		12.35%		0.00%
09/15/20		79.61%		58.10%		39.34%		29.37%		18.94%		8.00%		0.00%
10/15/20		74.74%		53.40%		34.83%		24.95%		14.64%		3.83%		0.00%
11/15/20		69.84%		48.74%		30.39%		20.65%		10.47%		0.00%		0.00%
12/15/20		64.91%		44.11%		26.04%		16.45%		6.45%		0.00%		0.00%
01/15/21		59.97%		39.51%		21.77%		12.37%		2.57%		0.00%		0.00%
02/15/21		55.00%		34.95%		17.59%		8.40%		0.00%		0.00%		0.00%
03/15/21		50.00%		30.42%		13.49%		4.54%		0.00%		0.00%		0.00%
04/15/21		44.98%		25.92%		9.48%		0.80%		0.00%		0.00%		0.00%
05/15/21		39.94%		21.46%		5.55%		0.00%		0.00%		0.00%		0.00%
06/15/21		34.87%		17.03%		1.71%		0.00%		0.00%		0.00%		0.00%
07/15/21		29.78%		12.64%		0.00%		0.00%		0.00%		0.00%		0.00%
08/15/21		24.67%		8.29%		0.00%		0.00%		0.00%		0.00%		0.00%
09/15/21		20.60%		4.77%		0.00%		0.00%		0.00%		0.00%		0.00%
10/15/21		16.81%		1.51%		0.00%		0.00%		0.00%		0.00%		0.00%
11/15/21		12.99%		0.00%		0.00%		0.00%		0.00%		0.00%		0.00%
12/15/21		9.16%		0.00%		0.00%		0.00%		0.00%		0.00%		0.00%
01/15/22		5.31%		0.00%		0.00%		0.00%		0.00%		0.00%		0.00%
02/15/22		1.43%		0.00%		0.00%		0.00%		0.00%		0.00%		0.00%
03/15/22		0.00%		0.00%		0.00%		0.00%		0.00%		0.00%		0.00%
Weighted Average Life (Years) to Call		3.18		2.84		2.54		2.37		2.21		2.04		1.79
Weighted Average Life (Years) to Maturity		3.18		2.84		2.54		2.37		2.21		2.04		1.79

53

Percent of the Initial Note Principal Balance Outstanding—Class A-4 Notes

Distribution Date	0.00%		0.50%		0.90%		1.10%		1.30%		1.50%		1.80%
Closing Date		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%
02/15/18		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%
03/15/18		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%
04/15/18		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%
05/15/18		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%
06/15/18		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%
07/15/18		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%
08/15/18		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%
09/15/18		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%
10/15/18		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%
11/15/18		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%
12/15/18		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%
01/15/19		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%
02/15/19		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%
03/15/19		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%
04/15/19		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%
05/15/19		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%
06/15/19		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%
07/15/19		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%
08/15/19		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%
09/15/19		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%
10/15/19		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%
11/15/19		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%
12/15/19		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%
01/15/20		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%
02/15/20		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%
03/15/20		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%
04/15/20		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%
05/15/20		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%
06/15/20		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%
07/15/20		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		96.74%
08/15/20		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		80.87%
09/15/20		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		65.81%
10/15/20		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		51.64%
11/15/20		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		99.38%		38.40%
12/15/20		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		85.53%		26.07%
01/15/21		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		72.30%		14.58%
02/15/21		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		95.78%		59.70%		3.87%
03/15/21		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		82.78%		47.72%		0.00%
04/15/21		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		70.30%		36.38%		0.00%
05/15/21		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		89.78%		58.34%		25.68%		0.00%
06/15/21		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		77.08%		46.91%		15.62%		0.00%
07/15/21		100.00%		100.00%		92.64%		64.80%		36.02%		6.21%		0.00%
08/15/21		100.00%		100.00%		79.40%		52.95%		25.65%		0.00%		0.00%
09/15/21		100.00%		100.00%		68.47%		42.97%		16.67%		0.00%		0.00%
10/15/21		100.00%		100.00%		58.35%		33.73%		8.35%		0.00%		0.00%
11/15/21		100.00%		93.74%		48.44%		24.79%		0.41%		0.00%		0.00%
12/15/21		100.00%		82.12%		38.77%		16.15%		0.00%		0.00%		0.00%
01/15/22		100.00%		70.60%		29.33%		7.82%		0.00%		0.00%		0.00%
02/15/22		100.00%		59.16%		20.12%		0.00%		0.00%		0.00%		0.00%
03/15/22		91.11%		47.82%		11.15%		0.00%		0.00%		0.00%		0.00%
04/15/22		76.97%		36.57%		2.42%		0.00%		0.00%		0.00%		0.00%
05/15/22		62.75%		25.42%		0.00%		0.00%		0.00%		0.00%		0.00%
06/15/22		48.47%		14.36%		0.00%		0.00%		0.00%		0.00%		0.00%
07/15/22		34.11%		3.39%		0.00%		0.00%		0.00%		0.00%		0.00%
08/15/22		19.67%		0.00%		0.00%		0.00%		0.00%		0.00%		0.00%
09/15/22		10.71%		0.00%		0.00%		0.00%		0.00%		0.00%		0.00%
10/15/22		3.33%		0.00%		0.00%		0.00%		0.00%		0.00%		0.00%
11/15/22		0.00%		0.00%		0.00%		0.00%		0.00%		0.00%		0.00%
Weighted Average Life (Years) to Call		4.36		4.09		3.75		3.56		3.34		3.10		2.70
Weighted Average Life (Years) to Maturity		4.41		4.15		3.83		3.63		3.41		3.17		2.77

54

Percent of the Initial Note Principal Balance Outstanding—Class B Notes

Distribution Date	0.00%		0.50%		0.90%		1.10%		1.30%		1.50%		1.80%
Closing Date		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%
02/15/18		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%
03/15/18		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%
04/15/18		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%
05/15/18		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%
06/15/18		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%
07/15/18		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%
08/15/18		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%
09/15/18		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%
10/15/18		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%
11/15/18		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%
12/15/18		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%
01/15/19		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%
02/15/19		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%
03/15/19		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%
04/15/19		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%
05/15/19		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%
06/15/19		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%
07/15/19		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%
08/15/19		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%
09/15/19		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%
10/15/19		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%
11/15/19		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%
12/15/19		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%
01/15/20		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%
02/15/20		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%
03/15/20		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%
04/15/20		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%
05/15/20		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%
06/15/20		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%
07/15/20		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%
08/15/20		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%
09/15/20		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%
10/15/20		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%
11/15/20		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%
12/15/20		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%
01/15/21		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%
02/15/21		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%
03/15/21		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		75.71%
04/15/21		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		38.57%
05/15/21		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		4.04%
06/15/21		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		0.00%
07/15/21		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		0.00%
08/15/21		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		89.79%		0.00%
09/15/21		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		58.02%		0.00%
10/15/21		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		28.63%		0.00%
11/15/21		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		1.05%		0.00%
12/15/21		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		71.39%		0.00%		0.00%
01/15/22		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		42.67%		0.00%		0.00%
02/15/22		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		99.16%		15.50%		0.00%		0.00%
03/15/22		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		68.30%		0.00%		0.00%		0.00%
04/15/22		100.00%		100.00%		100.00%		38.69%		0.00%		0.00%		0.00%
05/15/22		100.00%		100.00%		75.68%		10.34%		0.00%		0.00%		0.00%
06/15/22		100.00%		100.00%		42.66%		0.00%		0.00%		0.00%		0.00%
07/15/22		100.00%		100.00%		10.61%		0.00%		0.00%		0.00%		0.00%
08/15/22		100.00%		70.12%		0.00%		0.00%		0.00%		0.00%		0.00%
09/15/22		100.00%		42.64%		0.00%		0.00%		0.00%		0.00%		0.00%
10/15/22		100.00%		19.94%		0.00%		0.00%		0.00%		0.00%		0.00%
11/15/22		83.68%		0.00%		0.00%		0.00%		0.00%		0.00%		0.00%
12/15/22		53.85%		0.00%		0.00%		0.00%		0.00%		0.00%		0.00%
01/15/23		23.86%		0.00%		0.00%		0.00%		0.00%		0.00%		0.00%
02/15/23		0.00%		0.00%		0.00%		0.00%		0.00%		0.00%		0.00%
Weighted Average Life (Years) to Call		4.46		4.21		3.88		3.71		3.46		3.21		2.79
Weighted Average Life (Years) to Maturity		4.93		4.65		4.40		4.22		3.98		3.69		3.22

55

THE NOTES

The notes will be issued pursuant to the terms of the indenture, which may be amended and supplemented from time to time, to be dated as of the closing date between the trust and the indenture trustee. A form of indenture was filed as an exhibit to the registration statement of which this prospectus forms a part, but the form of indenture does not describe the specific terms of the notes. A copy of the final indenture under which the notes are issued will be available to noteholders from the depositor upon request and will be filed with the SEC no later than the date of the filing of the final prospectus for the notes. The following summary describes the material terms of the notes and the indenture. Where particular provisions or terms used in the indenture are referred to, the actual provisions, including definitions of terms, are incorporated by reference as part of the summary.

All payments required to be made on the notes will be made monthly on each distribution date.

The principal amount, interest rate and the Final Scheduled Distribution Date for each class of the offered notes are as set forth on the cover page of this prospectus.

The corresponding information for the Class C Notes and the Class D Notes is set forth in the following table:

	Class C Notes		Class D Notes
Principal Amount	$	19,600,000	$	14,560,000
Interest Rate		2.83%		3.22%
Final Scheduled Distribution Date		August 15, 2023		October 15, 2024

Distributions

On or before each distribution date, the servicer will transfer all collections on the receivables during the prior month or since the cutoff date, in the case of the initial distribution date, to the Collection Account. On the first distribution date, the indenture trustee will transfer all amounts in the reserve account to the Collection Account. The indenture trustee will make distributions to the Note Distribution Account and the reserve account from the amounts on deposit in the Collection Account. Beginning on the initial distribution date, collections on the receivables will be transferred from the Collection Account to the Note Distribution Account and the Certificate Distribution Account for distribution to noteholders and certificateholders. Distributions of principal and interest on the notes, if any, and distributions on the certificates, if any, will be made by the indenture trustee or the owner trustee, or other certificate paying agent, as applicable, to the noteholders and the certificateholders. The indenture trustee or the owner trustee, or other certificate paying agent, as applicable, will make distributions to the noteholders and certificateholders of record on the record date. The amount to be distributed to the Note Distribution Account and the reserve account will be determined in the manner described below. The timing, calculation, allocation, order, source, priorities of and requirements for all payments to each class of noteholders and all distributions to each class of certificateholders is set forth below under “—Priorities for Applications.”

Distributions in respect of principal will be subordinate to distributions in respect of interest, and distributions in respect of the certificates will be subordinate to payments in respect of the notes.

The chart titled “Summary of Monthly Deposits to and Withdrawals from Accounts,” which appears on page 20 of this prospectus, provides a summary of the monthly distributions. This summary chart provides only a simplified overview of the monthly flow of funds. Therefore, you should also read the text of this prospectus to understand the monthly flow of funds.

The ability of the servicer to make modifications on the receivables is not expected to have a material impact on the distributions on the notes. For a description of the servicer’s ability to make modifications to the receivables, see “Servicing Procedures” in this prospectus.

Monthly Withdrawals and Deposits. On or before the tenth day of each calendar month, or if that day is not a business day, the next business day, the servicer will calculate the following amounts, among others:

56

Based on activity during the prior monthly period:

• the Available Interest,

• the Available Principal, and

• the Specified Reserve Account Balance.

Amounts distributable on the upcoming distribution date:

• the basic servicing fee,

• the Aggregate Noteholders’ Interest Distributable Amount, including the Aggregate Class A Interest Distributable Amount, the Aggregate Class B Interest Distributable Amount, the Aggregate Class C Interest Distributable Amount and the Aggregate Class D Interest Distributable Amount,

• the Aggregate Noteholders’ Priority Principal Distributable Amount, including the First Priority Principal Distributable Amount, the Second Priority Principal Distributable Amount, the Third Priority Principal Distributable Amount and the Fourth Priority Principal Distributable Amount,

• deposits into the reserve account, and

• the Noteholders’ Regular Principal Distributable Amount.

Based on those calculations, the servicer will deliver to the indenture trustee a certificate specifying those amounts and instructing the indenture trustee to make withdrawals, deposits and payments on that distribution date of the amounts specified below under “—Priorities for Applications.”

On each distribution date, all amounts on deposit in the Note Distribution Account will be distributed to the noteholders as described in this prospectus.

Priorities for Applications. On each distribution date, the indenture trustee will make the distributions and payments in the following priority, to the extent that funds are available therefor after all prior applications, from the funds available in the Collection Account and reserve account:

(1) to the servicer, the basic servicing fee,

(2) to the asset representations reviewer, the fees, expenses and indemnities due and owing under the asset representations review agreement, and to the indenture trustee and the vote tabulation agent, any fees, costs and indemnities with respect to an asset representations review, each of which have not been previously paid in full, up to a maximum of $275,000 per year,

(3) to the Note Distribution Account for payment to the Class A Noteholders, the Aggregate Class A Interest Distributable Amount,

(4) to the Note Distribution Account for payment to the noteholders, the First Priority Principal Distributable Amount,

(5) to the Note Distribution Account for payment to the Class B Noteholders, the Aggregate Class B Interest Distributable Amount,

(6) to the Note Distribution Account for payment to the noteholders, the Second Priority Principal Distributable Amount,

57

(7) to the Note Distribution Account for payment to the Class C Noteholders, the Aggregate Class C Interest Distributable Amount,

(8) to the Note Distribution Account for payment to the noteholders, the Third Priority Principal Distributable Amount,

(9) to the Note Distribution Account for payment to the Class D Noteholders, the Aggregate Class D Interest Distributable Amount,

(10) to the Note Distribution Account for payment to the noteholders, the Fourth Priority Principal Distributable Amount,

(11) to deposit into the reserve account, the amount required to bring the amount on deposit therein up to the Specified Reserve Account Balance,

(12) to the Note Distribution Account for payment to the noteholders in the order specified below in “The Notes—Payments of Principal,” an amount equal to the Noteholders’ Regular Principal Distributable Amount,

(13) to the indenture trustee, any costs of the indenture trustee incurred associated with a resignation of the servicer and the appointment of a successor servicer,

(14) to the owner trustee, the indenture trustee, the administrator and the asset representations reviewer, amounts due and owing under the trust agreement, the indenture, the servicing agreement, the administration agreement and the asset representations review agreement, which have not been previously paid in full, and

(15) to the Certificate Distribution Account if such account has been established, otherwise to the certificateholders, in accordance with their respective certificate interests, all remaining amounts.

Notwithstanding the foregoing, if an Event of Default occurs and the notes are accelerated, until the time when all events of default have been cured or waived as provided in the indenture, the issuing entity will use the amounts allocated to the Note Distribution Account pursuant to priorities (3) through (10) above to pay interest and principal as follows: first the issuing entity will pay interest on the Class A Notes, pro rata among the Class A Notes and second pay principal on the Class A Notes, sequentially by class, starting with the Class A-1 Notes, until the Class A Notes are paid in full. No interest or principal will be payable on the Class B Notes until all principal of and interest on the Class A Notes have been paid in full, no interest or principal will be payable on the Class C Notes until all principal of and interest on the Class A Notes and the Class B Notes have been paid in full, and no interest or principal will be payable on the Class D Notes until all principal of and interest on the Class A Notes, the Class B Notes and the Class C Notes have been paid in full.

Payments of Interest

Interest on the unpaid principal balance of each class of notes will accrue at the applicable interest rate and will be paid monthly on each distribution date.

Interest will accrue on the offered notes from and including the closing date. For each class of notes, interest will be payable on each distribution date in an amount equal to the Note Class Interest Distributable Amount for that distribution date. The interest rate for each class of notes will be a fixed rate. Interest on the notes, other than the Class A-1 Notes, will be calculated on the basis of a 360-day year consisting of twelve 30-day months. Interest on the Class A-1 Notes will be calculated on the basis of actual days elapsed during the period for which interest is payable and a 360-day year.

Interest payments on the Class A-1 Notes, the Class A-2 Notes, the Class A-3 Notes and the Class A-4 Notes will have the same priority. Under some circumstances, the amount available to make these payments could

58

be less than the amount of interest payable on the Class A Notes on any distribution date, in which case each class of Class A noteholders will receive its ratable share of the aggregate amount available to be distributed in respect of interest on the Class A Notes. Each class’s ratable share of the aggregate amount available will be based upon the aggregate amount of interest due to that class of noteholders on that distribution date. See “—Distributions” above and “The Transfer Agreements and the Servicing Agreements—Credit Enhancement—Reserve Account” in this prospectus. No interest will be paid on the Class B Notes on any distribution date until all interest due and payable on the Class A Notes has been paid in full, no interest will be paid on the Class C Notes on any distribution date until all interest due and payable on the Class A Notes and the Class B Notes has been paid in full, and no interest will be paid on the Class D Notes on any distribution date until all interest due and payable on the Class A Notes, the Class B Notes and the Class C Notes has been paid in full. The payment of interest on the Class B Notes is also subordinated in limited circumstances to payments of principal of the Class A Notes, the payment of interest on the Class C Notes is subordinated in limited circumstances to payments of principal of the Class A Notes and the Class B Notes, and the payment of interest on the Class D Notes is subordinated in limited circumstances to payments of principal of the Class A Notes, the Class B Notes and the Class C Notes. These limited circumstances arise only if a payment of First Priority Principal Distributable Amount, Second Priority Principal Distributable Amount or Third Priority Principal Distributable Amount must, respectively, be made as described above in “—Distributions—Priorities for Applications” to the extent the payment reduces available funds below the respective interest distributable amount.

Failure to pay the full Note Class Interest Distributable Amount for the Controlling Class on any distribution date will constitute an Event of Default under the indenture after a five-day grace period. While any of the Class A Notes remain outstanding, failure to pay interest due on the Class B Notes, the Class C Notes and the Class D Notes, while any of the Class B Notes remain outstanding, failure to pay interest on the Class C Notes and the Class D Notes, and, while any of the Class C Notes remain outstanding, failure to pay interest on the Class D Notes, in each case, after a five-day grace period, will not be an Event of Default. See “—The Indenture—Events of Default; Rights Upon Event of Default” below.

If an Event of Default occurs and the notes are accelerated, until the time when all events of default have been cured or waived as provided in the indenture, the trust will first pay interest due on the Class A Notes, pro rata among the classes of the Class A Notes based on the principal amount of the Class A Notes as of the preceding distribution date, and second pay principal on the Class A Notes, sequentially by class, starting with the Class A-1 Notes, until paid in full. No interest will be payable on the Class B Notes until all principal of and interest on the Class A Notes have been paid in full, no interest will be payable on the Class C Notes until all principal of and interest on the Class A Notes and the Class B Notes have been paid in full, and no interest will be payable on the Class D Notes until all principal of and interest on the Class A Notes, the Class B Notes and the Class C Notes have been paid in full.

Payments of Principal

On each distribution date, the Aggregate Noteholders’ Principal Distributable Amount will be applied to make principal payments on the notes. Principal payments will be applied to the notes in sequential priority so that no principal payments will be made on any class of notes until all notes with a lower numerical and alphabetical designation have been paid in full. Thus, on each distribution date, the Aggregate Noteholders’ Principal Distributable Amount will be applied as follows:

• First, to the Class A-1 Notes, until the Class A-1 Notes are paid in full,

• Second, to the Class A-2 Notes, until the Class A-2 Notes are paid in full,

• Third, to the Class A-3 Notes, until the Class A-3 Notes are paid in full,

• Fourth, to the Class A-4 Notes, until the Class A-4 Notes are paid in full,

• Fifth, to the Class B Notes, until the Class B Notes are paid in full,

59

• Sixth, to the Class C Notes, until the Class C Notes are paid in full, and

• Seventh, to the Class D Notes, until the Class D Notes are paid in full.

At any time that the principal balances of the notes have been declared due and payable following the occurrence of an Event of Default, until the time when all events of default have been cured or waived as provided in the indenture, principal payments payable on the notes will be made sequentially by class, first on the Class A Notes, starting with the Class A-1 Notes, until the Class A Notes have been paid in full, and then in the order set forth above for the Class B Notes, the Class C Notes and the Class D Notes.

The remaining outstanding principal balance of each class of notes will be due on the related Final Scheduled Distribution Date. Failure to pay the full principal amount of a class of notes on or before the applicable Final Scheduled Distribution Date will constitute an Event of Default.

Redemption

If the servicer exercises its option to purchase the receivables when the aggregate receivables principal balance on the last day of any monthly period has declined to 10% or less of the initial aggregate receivables principal balance, then the outstanding notes will be redeemed in whole, but not in part, on the distribution date on which the servicer exercises this option. The servicer’s option is described in this prospectus under “The Transfer Agreements and the Servicing Agreements—Termination.” The redemption price will be equal to the unpaid principal amount of the notes, plus accrued and unpaid interest thereon.

Controlling Class

For purposes of the Transfer Agreements and Servicing Agreements, the “Controlling Class” will be (a) so long as the Class A Notes are outstanding, the Class A Notes, (b) if the Class A Notes are no longer outstanding but the Class B Notes are outstanding, the Class B Notes, (c) if the Class A Notes and the Class B Notes are no longer outstanding but the Class C Notes are outstanding, the Class C Notes, and (d) if the Class A Notes, the Class B Notes and the Class C Notes are no longer outstanding but the Class D Notes are outstanding, the Class D Notes. During an Event of Default, the holders of a majority of the principal amount of the Controlling Class have the right to direct the indenture trustee to take one or more of the other actions specified in the indenture relating to the property of the trust, including a sale of the receivables. See “The Notes—The Indenture—Events of Default; Rights Upon Event of Default” in this prospectus. Furthermore, the holders of a majority of the principal amount of the Controlling Class, under certain circumstances, have the right to waive Servicer Defaults or to terminate the servicer as the servicer of the receivables. See “The Transfer Agreements and the Servicing Agreements—Rights upon Servicer Default” and “—Waiver of Past Defaults” in this prospectus.

The Indenture

The following summary describes the material terms of the form of indenture. A form of indenture was filed as an exhibit to the registration statement of which this prospectus forms a part, but the form of indenture does not describe the specific terms of the notes. A copy of the final indenture under which the notes are issued will be available to noteholders from the depositor upon request and will be filed with the SEC no later than the date of the filing of the final prospectus for the notes.

Notes legally or beneficially owned by the depositor or its affiliates will be entitled to equal and proportionate benefits under the indenture, except that notes that are both legally and beneficially owned by the issuing entity, any other obligor on the notes, any certificateholder or any affiliate of any of the foregoing persons will be deemed not to be outstanding in accordance with the Trust Indenture Act of 1939, as amended, for the purpose of determining whether the requisite percentage of noteholders have given any request, demand, authorization, direction, notice, consent or other action under the Related Documents.

Modification of Indenture Without Noteholder Consent. The trust and indenture trustee may, when authorized by an issuing entity order and with prior notice to the rating agencies hired to rate the notes, but without consent of the noteholders, enter into one or more supplemental indentures for any of the following purposes:

60

(1) to correct or amplify the description of the collateral,

(2) to add additional collateral, provided that the consent of the certificateholders shall be required,

(3) to provide for the assumption of the notes and the indenture obligations by a permitted successor to the trust,

(4) to add additional covenants for the benefit of the noteholders,

(5) to convey, transfer, assign, mortgage or pledge any property to or with the indenture trustee,

(6) to cure any ambiguity or correct or supplement any provision in the indenture or in any supplemental indenture which may be inconsistent with any other provision of the indenture or in any supplemental indenture or in any other Related Document,

(7) to provide for the acceptance of the appointment of a successor indenture trustee or to add to or change any of the provisions of the indenture as will be necessary and permitted to facilitate the administration by more than one trustee,

(8) to modify, eliminate or add to the provisions of the indenture in order to comply with the Trust Indenture Act of 1939, as amended,

(9) to modify, eliminate or add provisions to the indenture as permitted by the FDIC Rule Covenant, or

(10) to add any provisions to, change in any manner or eliminate any of the provisions of the indenture or modify in any manner the rights of noteholders under that indenture; provided that any action specified in this clause (10) shall not, as evidenced by an opinion of counsel, adversely affect in any material respect the interests of any of the other noteholders unless noteholder consent is otherwise obtained as described in the next section of this prospectus and the rating agencies hired to rate the notes are provided with prior notice of such amendment.

In each case, no supplemental indenture will be permitted unless, as evidenced by an opinion of counsel, the supplemental indenture would not cause the trust to fail to qualify as a grantor trust for federal income tax purposes.

Modification of Indenture With Noteholder Consent. The trust and the indenture trustee may execute a supplemental indenture to add provisions to, change in any manner or eliminate any provisions of the indenture, or modify in any manner the rights of the noteholders with the consent of the holders of a majority in aggregate principal amount of the Controlling Class.

Without the consent of the holder of each outstanding note which would be affected, however, no supplemental indenture will:

(1) change the due date of any installment of principal of or interest on any note or reduce the principal amount of any note, the interest rate specified thereon or the redemption price with respect thereto or change any place of payment where or the coin or currency in which any note or any interest thereon is payable or modify any of the provisions of the indenture in a manner as to affect the calculation of the amount of any payment of interest or principal due on any note on any distribution date,

(2) impair the right to institute suit for the enforcement of specified provisions of the indenture regarding payment of principal or interest on any note,

(3) reduce the percentage of the aggregate principal amount of the Controlling Class, the consent of the holders of which is required for any supplemental indenture or the consent of the holders of which is

61

required for any waiver of compliance with specified provisions of the indenture or of specified defaults thereunder and their consequences as provided for in the indenture,

(4) modify any of the provisions of the indenture regarding the voting of notes held by the trust, any other obligor on the notes, the depositor or an affiliate of any of them,

(5) reduce the percentage of the aggregate outstanding principal amount of the notes the consent of the holders of which is required to direct the indenture trustee to sell or liquidate the assets of the trust if the proceeds of that sale would be insufficient to pay the principal amount and accrued but unpaid interest on the outstanding notes,

(6) amend the sections of the indenture to decrease the minimum percentage of the aggregate principal amount of the outstanding notes necessary to amend the indenture,

(7) modify any of the provisions of the indenture to change the calculation of the amount of any payment of interest or principal due on any distribution date, or

(8) permit the creation of any lien ranking prior to or on a parity with the lien of the indenture on any part of the assets of the trust or, except as otherwise permitted or contemplated in the indenture, terminate the lien of the indenture on that collateral or deprive the holder of any note of the security afforded by the lien of the indenture.

In each case, no supplemental indenture will be permitted unless, as evidenced by an opinion of counsel, the supplemental indenture would not cause the trust to fail to qualify as a grantor trust for federal income tax purposes.

The trust and the indenture trustee may, when authorized by an issuing entity order, with prior notice to the rating agencies hired to rate the notes and with the consent of the holders of not less than a majority of the outstanding amount of the Controlling Class, enter into supplemental indentures for the purpose of materially changing the rights of the noteholders. The indenture trustee may in its discretion determine whether or not any notes would be affected (such that the consent of each noteholder would be required) by any supplemental indenture proposed and any such determination will be binding upon the holders of all notes, whether authenticated and delivered thereunder before or after the date upon which such supplemental indenture becomes effective.

Events of Default; Rights Upon Event of Default. Events of Default under the indenture consist of:

(1) any failure to pay interest on the Controlling Class, as and when the same becomes due and payable, which failure continues unremedied for five days,

(2) except as provided in clause (3), any failure (A) to make any required payment of principal on the notes as and when the same becomes due and payable or (B) to observe or perform in any material respect any other covenants or agreements in the indenture other than the FDIC Rule Covenant, which failure in the case of a default under clause (2)(B) materially and adversely affects the rights of noteholders, and which failure in either case continues unremedied for 30 days after the giving of written notice of the failure (X) to the trust, and to the depositor or the servicer, as applicable, by the indenture trustee or (Y) to the depositor or the servicer, as applicable, and the indenture trustee by the holders of not less than 25% of the aggregate principal amount of the Controlling Class,

(3) failure to pay the unpaid principal balance of any class of notes on or prior to the respective final scheduled distribution date for that class, and

(4) events of bankruptcy, insolvency or receivership for the trust indicating its insolvency, reorganization pursuant to bankruptcy proceedings or inability to pay its obligations.

62

However, the amount of principal required to be paid to noteholders under the indenture governing a class of notes will generally be limited to amounts available to be deposited in the Note Distribution Account.

Therefore, the failure to pay principal on a class of notes generally will not result in the occurrence of an Event of Default unless that class of notes has a final scheduled distribution date, and then not until the occurrence of the final scheduled distribution date for that class of notes.

If an Event of Default should occur and be continuing, the indenture trustee or holders of a majority in principal amount of the Controlling Class then outstanding may declare the unpaid principal and accrued and unpaid interest of the notes to be immediately due and payable. This declaration may, under specified circumstances, be rescinded by the holders of a majority in principal amount of the Controlling Class.

If the notes are declared due and payable following an Event of Default, then, in lieu of the indenture trustee maintaining the assets of the trust and continuing to apply collections on the receivables as if there had been no declaration of acceleration, the indenture trustee may:

(1) institute proceedings to collect amounts due, including amounts due on foreclosed property,

(2) institute proceedings for the complete or partial foreclosure on the collateral securing the notes,

(3) exercise remedies as a secured party, or

(4) sell the assets of the trust.

In that event, any money or property collected by the indenture trustee shall be applied:

(1) first to the indenture trustee for fees, expenses and indemnification due to it under the indenture and not paid, if any,

(2) next to the owner trustee for amounts due, not including amounts due for payments to the certificateholders, under the trust agreement and Related Documents,

(3) next to the asset representations reviewer for amounts due under the asset representations review agreement,

(4) next to the administrator for amounts due under the administration agreement, and

(5) the remainder to the collection account for distribution pursuant to the Related Documents.

The indenture trustee, however, is prohibited from selling the receivables following an Event of Default, unless:

(1)(A) the holders of all the outstanding notes consent to the sale or liquidation,

(B) the proceeds of the sale are sufficient to pay in full the principal of and the accrued interest on the outstanding notes at the date of the sale or liquidation, or

(C)(i) there has been a default in the payment of interest or principal on the notes,

(ii) the indenture trustee determines that the receivables will not continue to provide sufficient funds on an ongoing basis to make all payments on the notes as the payments would have become due if the obligations had not been declared due and payable, and

(iii) the indenture trustee obtains the consent of the holders of 66  ²⁄₃% of the aggregate outstanding amount of the Controlling Class, and

63

(2) ten days prior written notice of the sale or liquidation of the notes has been given to the rating agencies that have been hired to rate the notes.

Following a declaration upon an Event of Default that the notes are immediately due and payable, (X) noteholders will be entitled to ratable repayment of principal on the basis of their respective unpaid principal balances and (Y) repayment in full of the accrued interest on and unpaid principal balances of the notes will be made prior to any further distributions on the certificates.

Subject to the provisions of the indenture relating to the duties of the indenture trustee, if an Event of Default occurs and is continuing with respect to the notes, the indenture trustee will be under no obligation to exercise any of the rights or powers under the indenture at the request or direction of any of the holders of those notes, if the indenture trustee reasonably believes it will not be adequately indemnified against the costs, expenses and liabilities which might be incurred by it in complying with the request. Subject to the provisions for indemnification and to limitations contained in the indenture, the holders of a majority in aggregate principal amount of the Controlling Class will have the right to direct the time, method and place of conducting any proceeding for any remedy available to the indenture trustee and the holders of a majority in aggregate principal amount of the Controlling Class may, in specified cases, waive any default with respect thereto, except a default in the payment of principal or interest or a default in respect of a covenant or provision of the indenture that cannot be modified without the waiver or consent of all of the holders of those outstanding notes.

In the event that the indenture trustee is not entitled to be indemnified from the cash flow that would otherwise be used to pay the securities, if an Event of Default occurs and the servicer fails to satisfy its indemnification obligations under the indenture, the indenture trustee may be entitled to be indemnified from the trust estate.

No holder of a note will have the right to institute any proceeding regarding the indenture governing the notes, except in accordance with the dispute resolution proceedings described under “The Receivables Pool—Dispute Resolution,” unless:

(1) the holder previously has given to the indenture trustee written notice of a continuing Event of Default,

(2) the holders of not less than 25% in aggregate principal amount of the Controlling Class have made written request of the indenture trustee to institute the proceeding in its own name as indenture trustee,

(3) the holder or holders have offered the indenture trustee reasonable indemnity,

(4) the indenture trustee has for 60 days failed to institute the proceeding, and

(5) no direction inconsistent with the written request has been given to the indenture trustee during the 60-day period by the holders of a majority in aggregate principal amount of the Controlling Class.

If an Event of Default occurs and is continuing and if it is known to the indenture trustee, the indenture trustee will mail to each noteholder notice of the Event of Default within the later of (a) 90 days after it occurs and (b) ten days after it is known to a responsible officer of the indenture trustee. Except in the case of a failure to make any required payment of principal of or interest on any note, the indenture trustee may withhold the notice beyond the 90-day period if and so long as it determines in good faith that withholding the notice is in the interests of noteholders.

In addition, the indenture trustee and the noteholders, by accepting the notes, will covenant that they will not, for a period of one year and one day after the termination of the trust agreement, institute against the trust or depositor, any bankruptcy, reorganization or other proceeding under any federal or state bankruptcy or similar law.

64

Neither the indenture trustee nor the owner trustee in its individual capacity, nor any holder of a certificate including, without limitation, the depositor, nor any of their respective owners, beneficiaries, agents, officers, directors, employees, affiliates, or any successors or assigns of the indenture trustee or the owner trustee will, in the absence of an express agreement to the contrary, be personally liable for the payment of the principal of or interest on the notes or for the agreements of the trust contained in the indenture.

Material Covenants. The indenture provides that the trust it binds may not consolidate with or merge into any other entity, unless:

(1) the entity formed by or surviving the consolidation or merger is organized under the laws of the United States, any state or the District of Columbia,

(2) the entity expressly assumes the trust’s obligation to make due and punctual payments on the notes and the performance or observance of every agreement and covenant of the trust under the indenture,

(3) no Event of Default has occurred and is continuing immediately after the merger or consolidation,

(4) none of the sponsor, the servicer, the indenture trustee or the trust has been advised that the rating of the notes then in effect would be reduced or withdrawn by the rating agencies hired to rate the notes as a result of the merger or consolidation,

(5) any action necessary to maintain the lien and security interest created by the indenture has been taken, and

(6) the trust has received an opinion of counsel to the effect that the consolidation or merger would have no material adverse tax consequence to the trust or to any noteholder or certificateholder.

The trust will not, among other things, except as expressly permitted by the Related Documents:

(1) sell, transfer, exchange or otherwise dispose of any of the assets of the trust,

(2) claim any credit on or make any deduction from the principal and interest payable in respect of the notes, other than amounts withheld under the Internal Revenue Code or applicable state law, or assert any claim against any present or former holder of the notes because of the payment of taxes levied or assessed upon the trust,

(3) dissolve or liquidate in whole or in part,

(4) permit the validity or effectiveness of the indenture to be impaired or permit any person to be released from any covenants or obligations regarding the notes under the indenture except as may be expressly permitted by the indenture, or

(5) permit any lien, charge, excise, claim, security interest, mortgage or other encumbrance to be created on or extend to or otherwise arise upon or burden the assets of the trust or any part of its assets, or any interest in its assets or the proceeds thereof.

The trust may not engage in any activity other than as specified under “The Trust” above. The trust may not incur, assume or guarantee any indebtedness other than indebtedness incurred pursuant to the notes it issues and the indenture which binds it or otherwise in accordance with the Related Documents.

FDIC Rule Covenant. The FDIC Rule imposes a number of requirements on the trust, the depositor, the sponsor or the servicer, and each such party agrees to facilitate compliance with these requirements by complying with its obligations in the FDIC Rule Covenant. See “Insolvency Aspects of the Offerings—FDIC Rule.” The indenture contains an FDIC Rule Covenant, which requires, among other things, that:

65

(1) payment of principal and interest on the securitization obligations must be primarily based on the performance of the financial assets transferred to the issuing entity;

(2) information describing the financial assets, obligations, capital structure, compensation of the relevant parties and historical performance data must be made available to the investors, including (i) information about the obligations and securitized financial assets in compliance with Regulation AB, (ii) information about the transaction structure, performance of the obligations, priority of payments, subordination features, representations and warranties regarding the financial assets, remedies, liquidity facilities, credit enhancement, waterfall triggers and policies governing delinquencies, servicer advances, loss mitigation and write-offs, (iii) information with respect to the credit performance of the obligations and financial assets on an ongoing basis, and (iv) the compensation paid to the originator, sponsor, rating agency, third-party advisor, broker and servicer and changes to such amounts paid, and the extent to which the risk of loss is retained by any of them;

(3) the sponsor or a majority-owned affiliate must retain an economic interest in a material portion (not less than five percent) of the credit risk of the financial assets;

(4) the obligations in the securitization cannot be predominantly sold to an affiliate (other than a wholly owned subsidiary consolidated for accounting and capital purposes with the sponsor) or insider of the sponsor;

(5) the sponsor must identify in its financial asset data bases and otherwise account for the financial assets transferred as specified by the FDIC Rule; and

(6) to the extent the sponsor is serving as servicer, custodian or paying agent, the sponsor must not comingle collections for more than two business days. See “Insolvency Aspects of the Offerings—FDIC Rule.”

Each noteholder by accepting a note will acknowledge and agree that the purpose of the FDIC Rule Covenant is to facilitate compliance with the FDIC Rule by Ally Bank, the depositor, the servicer and the trust, and that the provisions set forth in the FDIC Rule Covenant will have the effect and meanings that are appropriate under the FDIC Rule as such meanings change over time on the basis of evolving interpretations of the FDIC Rule.

Annual Compliance Statement. The trust will be required to file annually with the indenture trustee a written statement as to the fulfillment of its obligations under the indenture.

Satisfaction and Discharge of Indenture and Release of Trust Property.

Subject to the payment of its fees and expenses pursuant to the indenture, the indenture trustee may, and when required by the provisions of the indenture will, execute instruments to release property from the lien of the indenture, or convey the indenture trustee’s interest in the same. The indenture trustee will be required, at such time as there are no notes outstanding and all sums due to the indenture trustee have been paid, to release any remaining portion of the trust estate that secured the notes and the other secured obligations from the lien of the indenture and release to the trust or any other person entitled thereto any funds then on deposit in the designated accounts. The indenture trustee will release property from the lien of the indenture only upon receipt by it of an issuing entity request, an officer’s certificate, an opinion of counsel, confirmation that the indenture trustee has paid all amounts owing under each note and, if required by the Trust Indenture Act of 1939, as amended, independent certificates in accordance therewith. Upon sufficient notice prior to the redemption date from the servicer or trust, the indenture trustee, based on such notice, will be required to withdraw from the collection account and deposit into the note distribution account, on the redemption date, the aggregate redemption price of the notes, whereupon all such notes will be due and payable on the redemption date.

The indenture for the trust will be discharged upon the delivery to the indenture trustee for cancellation of all of the notes or, subject to limitations, upon deposit with the indenture trustee of funds sufficient for the payment in full of all notes. The indenture trustee will continue to act as indenture trustee under the indenture and the

66

servicing agreement for the benefit of certificateholders until all payments in respect of the certificates have been paid in full.

CREDIT RISK RETENTION

Ally Bank, as sponsor, or one of its majority-owned affiliates is required to retain an economic interest in the credit risk of the receivables sold to the depositor on the closing date under the risk retention regulations in 17 C.F.R. § 246.1, et seq. (“Regulation RR”). Ally Bank will satisfy its obligation to retain credit risk by causing the depositor or another majority-owned affiliate of the sponsor to retain an EVI. Ally Bank will satisfy the requirement to retain an EVI by retaining (itself or through a majority-owned affiliate) at least and approximately 5% (by initial principal balance) of each of the Class A-1 Notes, the Class A-2 Notes, the Class A-3 Notes, the Class A-4 Notes, the Class B Notes, the Class C Notes, the Class D Notes and the certificates. Ally Bank or its majority-owned affiliate will no longer be required to hold the EVI upon the latest to occur of the date on which the outstanding aggregate receivables principal balance is less than or equal to 33% of the initial aggregate receivables principal balance, the date on which the aggregate principal amount of the notes is less than or equal to 33% of the initial aggregate principal amount of the notes and two years after the closing date. Ally Bank, the depositor and any of their affiliates may not hedge or finance the EVI during this period, except as permitted under Regulation RR.

The Class C Notes and the Class D Notes (other than the EVI) will be sold in one or more private placements or retained initially by the depositor or its affiliate. The depositor or an affiliate will retain the certificates on the closing date. The depositor or its affiliate will retain the right to sell at any time all or a portion of such retained notes and the certificates to the extent that it is not required to retain such notes and certificates.

BOOK-ENTRY REGISTRATION

Book-Entry Registration

The offered notes will be issued on or about the closing date in book entry form through the facilities of DTC in the United States, and Clearstream or Euroclear in Europe, against payment in immediately available funds, in denominations of $1,000 and integral multiples of $1,000. The depositor has been informed by DTC that DTC’s nominee will be Cede & Co. Accordingly, Cede & Co. is expected to be the holder of record of the notes. Unless and until definitive notes are issued under the limited circumstances described in this prospectus, no noteholder will be entitled to receive a physical certificate representing a note. Unless otherwise set forth in this prospectus, all references in this prospectus to actions by noteholders refer to actions taken by DTC upon instructions from its participating organizations. All references in this prospectus to distributions, notices, reports and statements to noteholders refer to distributions, notices, reports and statements to DTC or Cede & Co., as the registered holder of the notes, as the case may be, for distribution to noteholders in accordance with DTC’s procedures with respect thereto. For additional information with respect to the global notes and Clearstream, Euroclear and book-entry registration, see below.

Noteholders that are not DTC participants or indirect DTC participants but desire to purchase, sell or otherwise transfer ownership of, or other interests in, notes may do so only through DTC participants and indirect DTC participants. In addition, noteholders will receive all distributions of principal and interest from the indenture trustee through DTC participants. Under a book-entry format, noteholders may experience some delay in their receipt of payments since these payments will be forwarded by the indenture trustee to Cede & Co., as nominee for DTC. DTC will forward these payments to its DTC participants, which thereafter will forward them to indirect DTC participants or noteholders. Except for the depositor, it is anticipated that the only noteholder will be Cede & Co., as nominee of DTC. Unless otherwise described in this prospectus, noteholders will not be recognized by the indenture trustee as noteholders as that term is used in the indenture, and noteholders will be permitted to exercise the rights of noteholders only indirectly through DTC and its DTC participants.

Because DTC can only act on behalf of DTC participants, who in turn act on behalf of indirect DTC participants and certain banks, the ability of noteholders to pledge notes to persons or entities that do not participate in the DTC system or to otherwise act with respect to the notes may be limited due to the lack of a physical certificate for the notes.

67

DTC has advised the depositor that it will take any action permitted to be taken by a noteholder under the indenture only at the direction of one or more DTC participants to whose accounts with DTC the notes are credited. DTC may take conflicting actions relating to other undivided interests to the extent that these actions are taken on behalf of DTC participants whose holdings include these undivided interests.

In addition to holding notes through DTC participants or indirect DTC participants in the United States as described above, holders of book-entry notes may hold their notes through Clearstream or Euroclear in Europe if they are participants of these systems, or indirectly through organizations which are participants in these systems. Clearstream Banking, S.A. is incorporated under the laws of Luxembourg as a professional depository and is subject to regulation by the Luxembourg Monetary Institute. The Euroclear system is owned by Euroclear Clearance System Public Limited Company and operated through a license agreement by Euroclear Bank S.A./N.V., a bank incorporated under the laws of the Kingdom of Belgium, the Euroclear Operator. The Euroclear Operator is regulated and examined by the Belgium Banking and Finance Commission and the National Bank of Belgium.

Clearstream and Euroclear will hold omnibus positions on behalf of their participants through customers’ securities accounts in Clearstream’s and Euroclear’s names on the books of their respective depositaries which in turn will hold these positions in customers’ securities accounts in the depositaries’ names on the books of DTC. Clearstream participants and Euroclear participants may not deliver instructions directly to the depositaries.

Distributions on notes held through Clearstream or Euroclear will be credited to the cash accounts of Clearstream participants or Euroclear participants in accordance with the relevant system’s rules and procedures, to the extent received by its depositary. These distributions will be subject to tax reporting in accordance with relevant United States tax laws and regulations. See “Federal Income Tax Consequences—The Notes—Information Reporting and Backup Withholding” in this prospectus. Clearstream or the Euroclear Operator, as the case may be, will take any other action permitted to be taken by a noteholder under the indenture or other Related Document on behalf of a Clearstream participant or Euroclear participant only in accordance with its relevant rules and procedures and subject to its depositary’s ability to effect these actions on its behalf through DTC.

Although DTC, Clearstream and Euroclear have agreed to the foregoing procedures in order to facilitate transfers of notes among participants of DTC, Clearstream and Euroclear, they are under no obligation to perform or continue to perform these procedures and these procedures may be discontinued at any time.

Except as required by law, neither the trust, the depositor, the servicer, the administrator, the owner trustee nor the indenture trustee will have any liability for any aspect of the records relating to or payments made on account of beneficial ownership interests of the notes held by Cede & Co., as nominee for DTC, by Clearstream or by Euroclear in Europe, or for maintaining, supervising or reviewing any records relating to these beneficial ownership interests.

Definitive Notes

Any notes originally issued in book-entry form will be issued in fully registered, certificated form as definitive notes to noteholders or their respective nominees, rather than to DTC or its nominee, only if:

(1) the administrator advises the indenture trustee in writing that DTC is no longer willing or able to discharge properly its responsibilities as depository for these notes and the trust is unable to locate a qualified successor,

(2) the administrator, at its option, elects to terminate the book-entry system through DTC, or

(3) after the occurrence of an Event of Default or a Servicer Default, holders representing at least a majority of the aggregate principal amount of the Controlling Class advise the appropriate trustee through DTC in writing that the continuation of a book-entry system through DTC, or a successor thereto, is no longer in the best interest of the holders of these notes.

68

Upon the occurrence of any event described in the immediately preceding paragraph, the indenture trustee will be required to notify DTC of the availability of definitive notes. DTC will notify all the note owners of the availability of definitive notes. Upon surrender by DTC of the definitive certificates representing the notes and receipt of instructions for re-registration, the indenture trustee will reissue these notes as definitive notes to holders thereof.

Distributions on the definitive notes will thereafter be made in accordance with the procedures set forth in the indenture directly to holders of definitive notes in whose names the definitive notes were registered at the close of business on the last day of the preceding monthly period. These distributions will be made by check mailed to the address of that holder as it appears on the register maintained by the indenture trustee. The final payment on any definitive note, however, will be made only upon presentation and surrender of the definitive note at the office or agency specified in the notice of final distribution to the holders of that class.

Definitive notes will be transferable and exchangeable at the offices of the indenture trustee or of a registrar named in a notice delivered to holders of definitive notes. No service charge will be imposed for any registration of transfer or exchange, but the indenture trustee may require payment of a sum sufficient to cover any tax or other governmental charge imposed in connection with the transfer or exchange.

REPORTS TO SECURITYHOLDERS

Reports to Securityholders

On or prior to each distribution date, the servicer will prepare and provide to the indenture trustee a statement to be delivered to the noteholders on that distribution date. Each statement to be delivered to noteholders will include the information set forth below as to the notes for that distribution date or the period since the previous distribution date on those notes, as applicable:

(1) the amount of the distribution allocable to principal of each class of the notes,

(2) the amount of the distribution allocable to interest on or for each class of notes,

(3) the amount of the distribution allocable to the certificateholders,

(4) the aggregate receivables principal balance as of the close of business on the last day of the preceding monthly period,

(5) the aggregate outstanding principal balance and the Note Pool Factor for each class of notes, after giving effect to all payments reported under (1) above,

(6) the amount of the servicing fees paid to the servicer for the prior monthly period or periods, as the case may be,

(7) the amount, if any, and purpose of any other fees or expenses accrued or paid, including any fees or expenses paid to the owner trustee, the indenture trustee, the asset representations reviewer or the administrator out of collections on the receivables,

(8) the amount, if any, distributed to noteholders and certificateholders from amounts on deposit in the reserve account,

(9) the amount, if any, accrued or paid with respect to the reserve account,

(10) the Noteholders’ Interest Carryover Shortfall and the Noteholders’ Principal Carryover Shortfall, if any, and the change in these amounts from the preceding statement,

69

(11) the balance of the reserve account, if any, on that date, after giving effect to changes in that reserve account on that date,

(12) the amount, if any, of excess cash distributed from the reserve account to the depositor or the certificateholders,

(13) cash flows received during the related monthly period and their sources,

(14) the number and dollar amount of receivables at the beginning and end of the applicable monthly period, and updated pool composition information as of the end of the monthly period, such as weighted average coupon, weighted average life, weighted average remaining term and prepayments,

(15) delinquency and loss information for the period and any material changes in determining or defining delinquencies, charge-offs and uncollectible accounts,

(16) the amount of receivables with respect to which material breaches of pool asset representations or warranties or transaction covenants have occurred,

(17) any material modifications, extensions or waivers relating to the terms of or fees, penalties or payments on, pool assets during the distribution period or that, cumulatively, have become material over time,

(18) the outstanding notional amount of the certificates to the extent the certificates are held by third parties,

(19) whether a delinquency trigger has been met or exceeded,

(20) if applicable, a statement that the servicer has received a communication request from a noteholder interested in communicating with other noteholders regarding the possible exercise of rights under the transaction documents, the name and contact information for the requesting noteholder and the date such request was received,

(21) a summary of the findings and conclusions of any asset representations review conducted by the asset representations reviewer,

(22) the nature and amount of any material change in the seller’s or an affiliate’s interest in the notes or certificates from their purchase, sale or other disposition,

(23) information with respect to any change in the asset representations reviewer,

(24) the commencement of an arbitration proceeding relating to a request to repurchase receivables and instructions for the noteholders to participate in any such proceeding,

(25) any voting instructions and procedures relating to a vote to require an asset representations review, and

(26) the required asset-level data for the receivables, which will be filed on Form ABS-EE.

In addition, each year the indenture trustee will send by email, facsimile or, if requested by the indenture trustee, first class mail a brief report, as described in “The Indenture Trustee” in this prospectus, to all noteholders.

Within the prescribed period of time for tax reporting purposes after the end of each calendar year during the life of the notes, the indenture trustee will mail to each holder of a class of notes who at any time during that calendar year has been a noteholder, and received any payment thereon, a statement containing information for the purposes of that noteholder’s preparation of federal income tax returns. As long as the holder of record of the notes

70

is Cede & Co., as nominee of DTC, beneficial owners of the notes will receive tax and other information from DTC participants and indirect DTC participants rather than from the trustees. See “Federal Income Tax Consequences” in this prospectus.

Investor Communications

The servicing agreement will provide that any noteholder (including a beneficial owner of the notes) may require that the servicer cause the issuing entity to include in its Form 10-D filing a request to communicate with other noteholders related to a possible exercising of the noteholders’ rights under the transaction documents. A noteholder should send its request to the servicer at securitization@ally.com. The noteholder should include in its request the method by which other noteholders should contact it.

The servicer will cause the following information to be included in the Form 10-D related to the reporting period in which the noteholder request was received:

• a statement that the servicer has received a communication request from a noteholder,

• the name of the noteholder making the request,

• the date the request was received,

• a statement that such noteholder is interested in communicating with other noteholders about the possible exercise of rights under the transaction documents, and

• a description of the method other noteholders may use to contact the requesting noteholder.

The servicer will bear any costs associated with including the above information in the Form 10-D. The noteholders will pay any costs associated with communicating with other noteholders, and no other transaction party, including the issuing entity, will be responsible for such costs.

If definitive notes are issued and the requesting noteholder is the record holder of any notes, no verification procedures will be required. If the requesting noteholder is not the record holder of any notes and is instead a beneficial owner of notes, the servicer may require no more verification than (1) a written certification from the noteholder that it is a beneficial owner of notes and (2) an additional form of documentation, such as a trade confirmation, an account statement, a letter from the broker or dealer or other similar document.

POOL FACTORS AND TRADING INFORMATION

Each Note Pool Factor will initially be 1.0000000. Thereafter the Note Pool Factor will decline to reflect reductions in the outstanding principal balance of the notes. A noteholder’s portion of the aggregate outstanding principal balance of a class of notes is the product of:

(1) the original denomination of the noteholder’s note, and

(2) the Note Pool Factor.

The noteholders will receive reports on or before each distribution date concerning payments received on the receivables, the aggregate receivables principal balance, each Note Pool Factor and various other items of information. Noteholders of record during any calendar year will be furnished information for tax reporting purposes not later than the latest date permitted by law. See “Reports to Securityholders.”

THE CERTIFICATES

One class of certificates will be issued pursuant to the terms of the trust agreement, a form of which has been filed as an exhibit to the registration statement of which this prospectus forms a part. Five percent of the

71

certificates will be retained by the depositor or a majority-owned affiliate of the sponsor. The depositor or an affiliate of the depositor will retain the remaining 95% of the certificates. The depositor or such affiliate will retain the right to sell all or a portion of such retained certificates at any time (other than the EVI). The following summary describes the material terms of the certificates and the trust agreement. Where particular provisions or terms used in the trust agreement are referred to, the actual provisions, including definitions of terms, are incorporated by reference as part of this summary.

Certificates owned by the depositor or its affiliates will be entitled to equal and proportionate benefits under the trust agreement, except that, if any certificates are owned by the depositor and its affiliates, those certificates will be deemed not to be outstanding for purposes of determining whether the requisite percentage of certificateholders have given any request, demand, authorization, direction, notice, consent or other action under the Related Documents other than commencement by the trust of a voluntary proceeding in bankruptcy as described in “The Transfer Agreements and the Servicing Agreements—Insolvency Event.”

Under the trust agreement, the trust, and the owner trustee on its behalf, and its certificateholders, by accepting the certificates, will covenant that they will not, for a period of one year and one day after the termination of the trust agreement, institute against the depositor any bankruptcy, reorganization or other proceeding under any federal or state bankruptcy or similar law.

THE TRANSFER AGREEMENTS AND THE SERVICING AGREEMENTS

The following summary describes the material terms of the Transfer Agreements and Servicing Agreements relating to the trust consisting of:

(1) the pooling agreement pursuant to which the depositor will purchase receivables from Ally Bank,

(2) the servicing agreement pursuant to which the servicer will agree to service the receivables,

(3) the custodian agreement pursuant to which Ally Bank, as custodian, will agree to act as custodian for the documents evidencing the receivables,

(4) the trust sale agreement pursuant to which the trust will acquire the receivables from the depositor,

(5) the trust agreement pursuant to which the trust will be created and certificates will be issued, and

(6) the administration agreement pursuant to which Ally Bank will undertake administrative duties for the trust.

Forms of the Transfer Agreements and Servicing Agreements have been filed as exhibits to the registration statement of which this prospectus forms a part. The depositor will provide a copy of the Transfer Agreements and Servicing Agreements, without exhibits, upon request to a holder of securities described in the Transfer Agreements and Servicing Agreements. Where particular provisions or terms used in the Transfer Agreements and Servicing Agreements are referred to, the actual provisions, including definitions of terms, are incorporated by reference as part of this summary. The parties will enter into the Transfer Agreements and the Servicing Agreements, each of which may be amended and supplemented from time to time, to be dated as of the closing date. A copy of the final Transfer Agreements and the Servicing Agreements for the notes will be available to noteholders from the depositor upon request and will be filed with the SEC no later than the date of the filing of the final prospectus for the notes.

Sale and Assignment of Receivables

On the closing date, Ally Bank will sell and assign to the depositor, without recourse, its entire interest in the receivables, including its security interests in the financed vehicles, pursuant to the pooling agreement between

72

Ally Bank and the depositor. The depositor will transfer and assign to the trust, without recourse, its entire interest in the receivables, including its security interests in the financed vehicles, pursuant to the trust sale agreement between the depositor and the trust. Each receivable of the trust will be identified in a schedule which will be on file at the locations set forth in an exhibit to the trust sale agreement. The trust will, concurrently with the transfer and assignment, execute and deliver the trust’s notes and certificates to the depositor in exchange for the receivables. The depositor will sell the notes offered by this prospectus to the respective underwriters. See “Plan of Distribution” in this prospectus.

In the pooling agreement, Ally Bank will represent and warrant to the depositor, among other things, that:

• the information provided in the schedule of receivables exhibit to the pooling agreement is correct in all material respects,

• the obligor on each receivable is required to maintain physical damage insurance covering the financed vehicle in accordance with Ally Bank’s normal requirements,

• as of the respective sale date, to the best of its knowledge, the receivables are free and clear of all filed security interests, liens, charges and encumbrances on account of work, labor or materials other than tax liens and other liens that arise by operation of law and no offsets, defenses or counterclaims have been asserted or threatened,

• as of the respective sale date, each receivable is or will be secured by a first perfected security interest in favor of Ally Bank in the financed vehicle, and

• each receivable, at the time it was originated complied, and as of the respective sale date complies, in all material respects with applicable federal and state laws, including, without limitation, consumer credit, truth-in-lending, equal credit opportunity and disclosure laws.

Additionally, Ally Bank will represent and warrant to the selection criteria set forth in “The Receivables Pool—Criteria Applicable to the Selection of Receivables” in this prospectus.

In the trust sale agreement, the depositor will assign the representations and warranties of Ally Bank, as set forth above, to the trust, and will represent and warrant to the trust that the depositor has taken no action which would cause the representations and warranties of Ally Bank to be false in any material respect as of the respective sale date.

As of the last day of the second, or, if the depositor elects, the first, month following the discovery by Ally Bank, the depositor, the servicer, the owner trustee or the indenture trustee of a breach of any representation or warranty of the depositor or Ally Bank that materially and adversely affects the interests of the securityholders in any receivable, the depositor, unless the breach is cured in all material respects, will repurchase or substitute, as required, or will enforce the obligation of Ally Bank under the pooling agreement to repurchase or substitute, as required, the Warranty Receivable from the trust at a price equal to the Warranty Payment.

The depositor will be required, on a mandatory basis, to substitute a comparable receivable (the “substitute receivable”) for a Warranty Receivable if the related breach is discovered within the first two years after the closing date. The aggregate receivables principal balance of all substitute receivables cannot be greater than 10% of the initial aggregate receivable principal balance. In the event that a breach of a representation or warranty is discovered and the depositor has already substituted receivables with an aggregate receivables principal balance of up to 10% of the initial aggregate receivables principal balance or if the related breach is discovered after the second anniversary of the closing date, the depositor will be required to repurchase the related Warranty Receivable. On the date that a Warranty Receivable is replaced with a substitute receivable, the related substitute receivable will be sold by Ally Bank to the depositor and will be transferred by the depositor to the issuing entity.

For each Warranty Receivable, Ally Bank will be required to identify one receivable that it owns that will constitute the related substitute receivable by identifying all of the receivables that satisfy the first clause set forth in

73

the following criteria and then removing the receivables that do not satisfy the criteria specified in each successive clause until only one receivable remains:

(1) First, the substitute receivable must satisfy each of the following criteria as of the related substitution date:

• to the extent that the Obligor with respect to the Warranty Receivable has a FICO score, the Obligor with respect to the substitute receivable has a FICO score equal to or greater than the FICO score of the Obligor with respect to the Warranty Receivable;

• the substitute receivable has a receivables principal balance, remaining term and annual percentage rate that is greater than or equal to the receivables principal balance, remaining term and annual percentage rate, respectively, of the Warranty Receivable;

• the related final scheduled payment date of the substitute receivable is earlier than six months prior to the final scheduled distribution date of the Class D Notes; and

• as of the related cutoff date, the substitute receivable satisfies the eligibility criteria set forth under “The Receivables Pool—Criteria Applicable to the Selection of Receivables” in this prospectus;

(2) Second, the substitute receivable must be the receivable owned by Ally Bank that has a principal balance closest to the principal balance of the related Warranty Receivable;

(3) Third, the substitute receivable must be the receivable owned by Ally Bank that has an annual percentage rate closest to the annual percentage rate of the related Warranty Receivable;

(4) Fourth, the substitute receivable must be the receivable owned by Ally Bank that has a remaining term closest to the remaining term of the Warranty Receivable;

(5) Fifth, the substitute receivable must be the receivable owned by Ally Bank that has an accompanying FICO score closest to the FICO store of the obligor related to the Warranty Receivable;

(6) Sixth, the substitute receivable must be the receivable that is secured by a vehicle that is closest to the vehicle that secures the related Warranty Receivable, with the characteristics determined in the following order of priority:

• the make of vehicle;

• the model year of vehicle;

• whether vehicle was used or new at the time the receivable was acquired by Ally Bank; and

• the mileage of the vehicle (if necessary, to the nearest 10^th of a mile).

In addition to the above criteria, the following additional criteria will be required to be satisfied in connection with the substitution of a Warranty Receivable:

• the depositor will deliver to the owner trustee and the indenture trustee assignments and certificates related to the substitute receivable;

• the depositor will agree to and must deposit into the Collection Account all collections with respect to the substitute receivable received since the related cutoff date within two business days after the related substitution date (or such later date as may be permitted under the Indenture);

74

• as of the substitution date, neither Ally Bank nor the depositor is insolvent nor will any of them have been made insolvent by such transfer nor is either of them aware of any pending insolvency; and

• the schedule of receivables has been amended to reflect the substitute receivable and the schedule of receivables as so amended is true and correct as of the substitution date.

Even though each substitute receivable must satisfy the eligibility criteria set forth under “The Receivables Pool—Criteria Applicable to the Selection of Receivables” in this prospectus, the substitute receivable may not be of the same credit quality as the Warranty Receivable because, among other things, that substitute receivable may not have been part of Ally Bank’s portfolio on the cutoff date. The substitute receivable may have been originated at a different time using credit criteria different from those applied to the Warranty Receivable.

The depositor or Ally Bank, as applicable, will be entitled to receive any amounts held by the servicer for that Warranty Receivable. These repurchase obligations constitute the sole remedies available to the trust, the noteholders, the indenture trustee, the certificateholders and the owner trustee for any uncured breaches.

In the servicing agreement, the servicer will covenant that:

• except as contemplated in that agreement, the pooling agreement, the trust sale agreement, the indenture and the trust agreement, the servicer will not release any financed vehicle from the security interest securing the receivable,

• the servicer will do nothing to impair the rights of the indenture trustee, the owner trustee, the trust, the noteholders or the certificateholders in the receivables, and

• the servicer will not amend or otherwise modify any receivable so that the amount financed, the APR or the number of originally scheduled due dates is altered or the last scheduled due date occurs after the final scheduled distribution date.

As of the last day of the second, or, if the servicer so elects, the first, month following the discovery by the servicer, the owner trustee or the indenture trustee of a breach of any covenant that materially and adversely affects any receivable and unless the breach is cured in all material respects, the servicer will make an Administrative Purchase Payment for the Administrative Receivable. The servicer will be entitled to receive any amounts held by the servicer for the Administrative Receivable. This repurchase obligation constitutes the sole remedy available to the trust, the indenture trustee, the owner trustee, the noteholders and the certificateholders for any uncured breaches.

Pursuant to the servicing agreement, the trust will agree to Ally Bank acting as custodian to maintain possession, as the trust’s agent, of the retail instalment sale contracts, direct purchase money loans and any other documents relating to the receivables. To assure uniform quality in servicing both the receivables and Ally Bank’s own portfolio of receivables, as well as to facilitate servicing and save administrative costs, the documents will not be physically segregated from other similar documents that are in Ally Bank’s possession nor will the documents be stamped or marked to reflect the transfer to the trust so long as Ally Bank is the custodian of these documents. However, Uniform Commercial Code financing statements reflecting the sale and assignment of the receivables to the trust and the pledge by the trust to the indenture trustee will be filed, and Ally Bank’s accounting records and computer files will reflect the sale and assignment. Because the receivables will remain in the possession of Ally Bank, as custodian, and will not be stamped or otherwise marked to reflect the assignment to the trust or the pledge to the indenture trustee, if a subsequent purchaser were able to take physical possession of the receivables without knowledge of the assignment, the trust’s and the indenture trustee’s interests in the receivables could be defeated. See “—Custodian Agreement” in this prospectus.

75

Servicer Advances

The servicer has no obligation to make advances under the servicing agreement to cover shortfalls in collections on the retail instalment sale contracts.

Accounts

The servicer will establish and maintain the following accounts:

• a Collection Account, in the name of the indenture trustee on behalf of the noteholders and the certificateholders, into which all payments made on or for the receivables will be deposited,

• a Note Distribution Account, in the name of the indenture trustee on behalf of the noteholders, in which amounts released from the Collection Account and the reserve account for payment to the noteholders will be deposited and from which all distributions to the noteholders will be made,

• if the certificates are sold by the depositor, a Certificate Distribution Account, in the name of the owner trustee on behalf of the certificateholders, in which amounts released from the Collection Account and the reserve account for distribution to the certificateholders will be deposited and from which all distributions to the certificateholders will be made, and

• a reserve account, which will be a segregated trust account held by the indenture trustee, in which funds will be deposited by the noteholders and from which payments to the noteholders, the certificateholders, the servicer and, in some cases, the depositor, will be made.

Funds on deposit in the Certificate Distribution Account will not constitute property of the issuing entity available to the noteholders. Upon and after any distribution to the Certificate Distribution Account of any amounts, the noteholders will not have any rights in or claims to those amounts.

The reserve account will be funded by an initial deposit by the noteholders on the closing date in the amount set forth under “—Credit Enhancement—Reserve Account” and on each distribution date thereafter up to the Specified Reserve Account Balance. On each distribution date, the servicer will deposit into the reserve account the amount of collections on the receivables remaining on each distribution date after the payment of the total servicing fee and the distributions and allocations to the noteholders and the certificateholders required on that date.

Funds in the Designated Accounts will be invested as specified in the servicing agreement in Eligible Investments. Eligible Investments generally are limited to obligations or securities that mature no later than the business day preceding the next distribution date. If the amount required to be withdrawn from the reserve account to cover shortfalls in collections on the receivables exceeds the amount of cash in the reserve account, a temporary shortfall in the amounts distributed to the noteholders or certificateholders could result, which could, in turn, increase the average life of the notes or the certificates. Investment earnings on funds deposited in the Designated Accounts, net of losses and investment expenses, will be payable to the servicer.

The Designated Accounts will be maintained as either of two types of accounts. The first type of account is a segregated account with an eligible institution. Eligible institutions are:

(1) the corporate trust department of the indenture trustee or the owner trustee, as applicable, or

(2) a depository institution organized under the laws of the United States of America or any one of the states thereof or the District of Columbia, or any domestic branch of a foreign bank, as long as that depository institution:

(A) has either (X) a long-term unsecured debt rating acceptable to the rating agencies hired to rate the notes or (Y) a short-term unsecured debt rating or certificate of deposit rating acceptable to the rating agencies hired to rate the notes, and

76

(B) has its deposits insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation or any successor thereto.

The second type of account is a segregated trust account with the corporate trust department of a depository institution organized under the laws of the United States of America or any one of the states thereof or the District of Columbia, or any domestic branch of a foreign bank. This depository institution must have corporate trust powers and act as trustee for funds deposited in the account and the securities of that depository institution must have a credit rating from each rating agency then rating that institution in one of its generic rating categories which signifies investment grade or such higher rating as required by the rating agencies hired to rate the notes.

Net Deposits

As an administrative convenience, during monthly periods in which the Monthly Remittance Condition is satisfied, the servicer will be permitted to deposit Warranty Payments and Administrative Purchase Payments for any monthly period net of distributions to be made to the servicer from the trust for that monthly period. The servicer, however, will account to the indenture trustee, the owner trustee, the noteholders and the certificateholders as if all deposits, distributions and transfers were made individually. In addition, whenever the Monthly Remittance Condition is satisfied, the servicer may retain collections allocable to the certificates, the Certificate Distribution Account, the notes or the Note Distribution Account until the distribution date, and pending deposit into the Collection Account, the Certificate Distribution Account or the Note Distribution Account, the collections may be employed by the servicer at its own risk and for its own benefit and will not be segregated from its own funds. On each distribution date, the servicer, the depositor, the indenture trustee and the owner trustee (or the trust’s paying agent) will make all distributions, deposits and other remittances on the certificates, the Certificate Distribution Account, the notes or the Note Distribution Account of the trust for the periods since the previous distribution was to have been made.

Evidence as to Compliance

The servicing agreement requires a firm of independent public accountants to furnish to the trust and the servicer on or before March 15 (or, if such day is not a business day, the next succeeding business day) of each year, beginning March 15 of the first calendar year following the closing date, a statement as to compliance by the servicer during the preceding twelve months ended December 31, or in the case of the first of these statements, the period from the closing date to December 31 of the year in which the closing date occurs, with standards relating to the servicing of the receivables, the servicer’s accounting records and computer files relating to those receivables and other specified matters, provided that, if the trust is not required to file periodic reports under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 or any other law, the statement may be furnished to the owner trustee and the indenture trustee on or before April 30 of each year.

The servicing agreement will also provide for delivery to the owner trustee and the indenture trustee, on or before March 15 (or, if such day is not a business day, the next succeeding business day) of each year, beginning March 15 of the first calendar year following the closing date, of a certificate signed by an officer of the servicer stating that the servicer has fulfilled in all material respects its obligations under the servicing agreement throughout the preceding twelve months ended December 31, or in the case of the first of these certificates, the period from the closing date to December 31 of the year in which the closing date occurs, or, if there has been a default in any material respect in the fulfillment of an obligation, describing each default, provided that, if the trust is not required to file periodic reports under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 or any other law, the certificate may be furnished to the owner trustee and the indenture trustee on or before April 30 of each year. The certificate may be provided as a single certificate making the required statements as to more than one servicing agreement.

Copies of the statements and certificates may be obtained by noteholders by a request in writing addressed to the indenture trustee.

In the servicing agreement, the servicer will agree to give the indenture trustee and the owner trustee notice of any event which with the giving of notice or the lapse of time, or both, unless cured, would become a Servicer

77

Default. In addition, the depositor will agree to give the indenture trustee, the owner trustee and the trust notice of specified covenant breaches which with the giving of notice or lapse of time, or both, unless cured, would constitute a Servicer Default.

Changes to Servicer; Servicer Indemnification and Proceedings

The servicing agreement will provide that Ally Bank may not resign from its obligations and duties as servicer under the servicing agreement, except upon a determination that Ally Bank’s performance of these duties as servicer is no longer permissible under applicable law. If at the time of resignation, a successor servicer has not accepted appointment, the indenture trustee will assume Ally Bank’s servicing obligations and duties under the servicing agreement. Costs associated with the resignation of the servicer and the appointment of a successor will be borne by the trust.

The servicing agreement will further provide that, except as specifically provided otherwise, neither the servicer nor any of its directors, officers, employees and agents will be under any liability to the trust or the noteholders or certificateholders for taking any action or for refraining from taking any action pursuant to the servicing agreement or the indenture or for errors in judgment. Neither the servicer nor any of these persons will be protected against any liability that would otherwise be imposed by reason of wilful misfeasance, bad faith or negligence—except errors in judgment—in the performance of the servicer’s duties under the servicing agreement or by reason of reckless disregard of its obligations and duties thereunder. The servicing agreement will further provide that the servicer and its directors, officers, employees and agents will be reimbursed by the indenture trustee or the owner trustee for any contractual damages, liability or expense incurred by reason of that trustee’s wilful misfeasance, bad faith or negligence (gross negligence, in the case of the owner trustee)—except errors in judgment—in the performance of that trustee’s duties under the servicing agreement or by reason of reckless disregard of its obligations and duties under the servicing agreement or under the trust agreement or the indenture. In addition, the servicing agreement will provide that the servicer is under no obligation to appear in, prosecute or defend any legal action that is not incidental to the servicer’s servicing responsibilities under the servicing agreement and that, in its opinion, may cause it to incur any expense or liability. The servicer may, however, undertake any reasonable action that it may deem necessary or desirable in respect of the servicing agreement and the rights and duties of the parties thereto and the interests of the noteholders and the certificateholders thereunder. If the servicer undertakes any action, the legal expenses and costs of the action and any liability resulting therefrom will be expenses, costs and liabilities of the trust, and the servicer will be entitled to be reimbursed out of the Collection Account. Any indemnification or reimbursement will reduce the amount otherwise available for distribution to the noteholders and the certificateholders.

Under the circumstances specified in the servicing agreement, any entity into which the servicer may be merged or consolidated, or any entity resulting from any merger or consolidation to which the servicer is a party, or any entity succeeding to the business of the servicer or, for its obligations as servicer, any entity 25% or more of the voting interests of which are owned, directly or indirectly, by General Motors or by Ally Financial, which entity in each of the foregoing cases assumes the obligations of the servicer under the servicing agreement, will be the successor of the servicer under the servicing agreement. So long as Ally Bank acts as servicer, the servicer may at any time subcontract any duties as servicer under the servicing agreement to any entity in which 25% or more of the voting interests are owned, directly or indirectly, by General Motors or by Ally Financial or to any entity that agrees to conduct these duties in accordance with the servicer’s servicing guidelines and the servicing agreement. The servicer may at any time perform specific duties as servicer through subcontractors who are in the business of servicing receivables similar to the receivables, provided that no delegation will relieve the servicer of its responsibility for these duties.

Servicer Default

Servicer Defaults under the servicing agreement will consist of:

(1) any failure by the servicer to make any required distribution, payment, transfer or deposit or to direct the indenture trustee to make any required distribution, which failure continues unremedied for five business days after written notice from the indenture trustee or the owner trustee is received by the servicer or after discovery of the failure by an officer of the servicer,

78

(2) any failure by the servicer to observe or perform in any material respect any other covenant or agreement in the servicing agreement, the trust agreement or the indenture other than the FDIC Rule Covenant which failure materially and adversely affects the rights of the noteholders or the certificateholders and which continues unremedied for 90 days after the giving of written notice of the failure to the servicer by the indenture trustee or the owner trustee or to the servicer, the indenture trustee and the owner trustee by holders of not less than 25% in principal amount of the Controlling Class or after discovery of the failure by an officer of the servicer, and

(3) events of bankruptcy, insolvency or receivership of the servicer or actions by the servicer indicating its insolvency, reorganization pursuant to bankruptcy proceedings, or inability to pay its obligations.

Notwithstanding the foregoing, there will be no Servicer Default where a Servicer Default would otherwise exist under clause (1) above for a period of an additional ten business days or under clause (2) for a period of an additional 60 days if the delay or failure giving rise to the Servicer Default was caused by an act of God or other similar occurrence. Upon the occurrence of any of these events, the servicer will not be relieved from using its best efforts to perform its obligations in a timely manner in accordance with the terms of the servicing agreement and the servicer will provide the indenture trustee, the owner trustee, the depositor and the noteholders prompt notice of the failure or delay by it, together with a description of its efforts to so perform its obligations.

Rights upon Servicer Default

As long as a Servicer Default under the servicing agreement remains unremedied, the indenture trustee or holders of not less than a majority in principal amount of the Controlling Class may terminate all the rights and obligations of the servicer under the servicing agreement. If the notes have been paid in full and the indenture has been discharged with respect thereto, the owner trustee or the holders of certificates evidencing not less than a majority of the voting interests of the outstanding certificates other than certificates owned by the trust, the depositor, the seller, the servicer or any of their respective affiliates may cause the termination of the servicer’s rights and obligations. In either case, upon the termination of the rights and obligations of the servicer, the indenture trustee will succeed to all the responsibilities, duties and liabilities of the servicer under the agreements and will be entitled to similar compensation arrangements. If, however, a bankruptcy trustee or similar official has been appointed for the servicer, and no Servicer Default other than the appointment has occurred, the bankruptcy trustee or official may have the power to prevent the indenture trustee or the noteholders from causing a transfer of servicing. If the indenture trustee is unwilling to so act, it may, and if it is unable to so act, it will appoint, or petition a court of competent jurisdiction for the appointment of, a successor with a net worth of at least $100,000,000 and whose regular business includes the servicing of automotive receivables and which satisfies the other criteria set forth in the servicing agreement. The indenture trustee may make arrangements for compensation to be paid, which in no event may be greater than the servicing compensation to the servicer under the servicing agreement. If the servicer is terminated under the servicing agreement, the servicer must transfer to the indenture trustee or the owner trustee for administration by it of all cash amounts held at that time by the servicer on behalf of the noteholders or the certificateholders for deposit, as applicable.

Waiver of Past Defaults

The holders of at least a majority in principal amount of the Controlling Class may, on behalf of all the noteholders and certificateholders, waive any default by the servicer in the performance of its obligations under the servicing agreement and its consequences. The holders, however, cannot waive a Servicer Default in making any required deposits to or payments from any of the Designated Accounts or the Certificate Distribution Account in accordance with the servicing agreement. No waiver will impair the noteholders’ or certificateholders’ rights regarding subsequent defaults.

Amendment

Each of the Transfer Agreements and Servicing Agreements may be amended by the parties thereto without the consent of the noteholders or certificateholders:

79

• to cure any ambiguity,

• to correct or supplement any provision of those agreements that may be defective or inconsistent with any other provision of those agreements or in any other Related Document,

• to add or supplement any credit, liquidity or other enhancement arrangement for the benefit of noteholders or certificateholders, provided that, if any addition affects any class of noteholders or certificateholders differently from any other class of noteholders or certificateholders, then the addition will not, as evidenced by an opinion of counsel, adversely affect in any material respect the interests of any class of noteholders or certificateholders, provided that the consent of the certificateholders shall be required,

• to add to the covenants, restrictions or obligations of the depositor, the servicer, the owner trustee or the indenture trustee, or

• to add, change or eliminate any other provisions of those agreements in any manner that will not, as evidenced by an opinion of counsel, adversely affect in any material respect the interests of the noteholders or the certificateholders.

Each of the Transfer Agreements and Servicing Agreements may also be amended by the parties thereto with the consent of the holders of at least a majority in principal amount of the Controlling Class for the purpose of adding any provisions to or changing in any manner or eliminating any of the provisions of the agreement or of modifying in any manner the rights of the noteholders or certificateholders. No amendment may:

(1) increase or reduce the interest rate or principal amount of any note or change any distribution date or the final scheduled distribution date of any note or distributions on the certificates without the consent of the holder thereof, any interest rate or the Specified Reserve Account Balance,

(2) adversely affect the rating of any class of notes by any rating agency hired to rate the notes without the consent of two-thirds of the principal amount of the outstanding notes or the voting interests of the outstanding certificates, as appropriate, or

(3) reduce the percentage required of noteholders or certificateholders to consent to any amendment without the consent of all of the noteholders or certificateholders, as the case may be.

An opinion of counsel must be delivered to the effect that any amendment would not cause the trust to fail to qualify as a grantor trust for federal income tax purposes.

Distribution of Assets Following Payment in Full of the Notes

Following payment in full of the notes and payment of liabilities of the trust in accordance with applicable law, any remaining assets in the trust and any remaining amount in the reserve account will be distributed to the holders of the certificates.

Insolvency Event

The trust agreement provides that the owner trustee does not have the power to commence a voluntary proceeding in bankruptcy relating to the trust without the prior approval of a majority of the certificateholders. Under no circumstance, however, will the owner trustee commence any proceeding prior to the date that is one year and one day after the termination of the trust. In the servicing agreement and the trust sale agreement, each of the servicer and the depositor, respectively, will covenant that it will not, for a period of one year and one day after the final distribution for the notes and the certificates to the Note Distribution Account or the Certificate Distribution Account, as applicable, institute against the trust any bankruptcy, reorganization or other proceeding under any federal or state bankruptcy or similar law. In the pooling agreement, Ally Bank will covenant that it will not, for a period of one year and one day after the final distribution for the notes and the certificates to the Note Distribution

80

Account or the Certificate Distribution Account, as applicable, institute against the trust or the depositor any bankruptcy, reorganization or other proceeding under any federal or state bankruptcy or similar law.

Certificateholder Liability; Indemnification

Under the trust agreement, certificateholders will be entitled to the same limitation of personal liability extended to stockholders of for profit corporations under the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware.

The servicing agreement provides that the servicer will indemnify the indenture trustee and the owner trustee from and against any loss, liability, expense, damage or cost arising out of or incurred in connection with the acceptance or performance of its duties pursuant to the servicing agreement, including any judgment, award, settlement, reasonable attorneys’ fees and other costs or expenses incurred in connection with the defense of any actual or threatened action, proceeding or claim. Neither the indenture trustee nor owner trustee will be indemnified if the acts or omissions or alleged acts or omissions constitute willful misfeasance, bad faith or negligence (gross negligence, in the case of the owner trustee) by the indenture trustee or the owner trustee, as applicable. In addition, the servicer will indemnify the trust, the indenture trustee, the owner trustee, the noteholders and the certificateholders against losses arising out of the negligence, willful misfeasance or bad faith of the servicer in the performance of its duties under the servicing agreement and the other transaction documents or by reason of its reckless disregard of its obligations and duties thereunder. The servicer will also indemnify the parties against any taxes that may be asserted against the parties for the transactions contemplated in the servicing agreement, other than taxes on the sale of receivables or securities, the ownership of receivables or the receipt of payments on securities or other compensation.

Termination

The trust will terminate upon the final distribution by the indenture trustee and the owner trustee of all monies and other property of the trust in accordance with the terms of the trust agreement, the indenture and the servicing agreement, including in the case of the exercise by the servicer of its repurchase option as described below. Upon termination of the trust and payment or deposit into the Note Distribution Account and the Certificate Distribution Account of all amounts to be paid to the securityholders, any remaining assets of the trust and any amounts remaining on deposit in the reserve account will be paid to the certificateholders.

In order to avoid excessive administrative expense, if the outstanding aggregate receivables principal balance of the receivables held by the trust is less than or equal to 10% of the initial aggregate receivables principal balance, the servicer or its successor will be permitted to purchase from the trust all remaining receivables and other trust assets. This purchase is at the option of the servicer, or its successor, and would be calculated as of the last day of any monthly period. The purchase price paid by the servicer, or its successor, would be equal to the greater of the aggregate receivables principal balance plus accrued and unpaid interest for these receivables and the sum of the basic servicing fee for the related monthly period and the unpaid principal of the outstanding notes plus, for all notes, accrued and unpaid interest thereon through but excluding the related distribution date. Any outstanding notes will be redeemed concurrently therewith and the subsequent distribution to certificateholders of all amounts required to be distributed to them pursuant to the trust agreement will effect early retirement of the certificates. The indenture trustee will give written notice of redemption to each noteholder of record and the owner trustee will give written notice of dissolution of the trust to each certificateholder of record. The final distribution to any noteholder or certificateholder will be made only upon surrender and cancellation of that noteholder’s note at an office or agency of the indenture trustee specified in the notice of redemption or that certificateholder’s certificate at an office or agency of the owner trustee specified in the notice of dissolution.

Administration Agreement

Ally Bank, in its capacity as administrator, will enter into the administration agreement with the trust and the indenture trustee pursuant to which Ally Bank, as administrator, will agree, to the extent provided in the administration agreement, to provide the notices and to perform other administrative obligations required by the indenture and the trust agreement. As compensation for the performance of the administrator’s obligations under the administration agreement and as reimbursement for its expenses thereto, Ally Bank, as administrator, will be entitled

81

to an administration fee in an amount equal to $1,500 per month. The servicer will pay the administration fee to the extent not waived by the administrator.

Custodian Agreement

To facilitate the servicing of the receivables, the trust will enter into the custodian agreement with Ally Bank pursuant to which Ally Bank will be authorized to act as custodian and to retain physical possession of the tangible records related to the receivables or “control” for purposes of the Uniform Commercial Code over the electronic records held by the trust and other documents relating thereto as custodian for the trust.

Credit Enhancement

Subordination of Interests.  The subordination of the Class B Notes, the Class C Notes and the Class D Notes in priority of payments to the Class A Notes provides additional credit enhancement to the holders of the Class A Notes. The subordination of the Class C Notes and the Class D Notes in priority of payments to the Class B Notes provides additional credit enhancement to the holders of the Class B Notes. The subordination of the Class D Notes in priority of payments to the Class C Notes provides additional credit enhancement to the holders of the Class C Notes. For a further description of the subordination of the notes, see “The Notes—Payments of Principal” and “The Notes—Payments of Interest.”

Reserve Account.  Amounts on deposit in the reserve account, if any, will be applied to make payments to noteholders and certificateholders in accordance with the priority of payments to the extent those amounts remain unsatisfied after the application of collections and other available funds in accordance with the priority of payments. The reserve account provides credit enhancement by adding an additional potential source of funds available to make payments on the securities. Pursuant to the servicing agreement, the issuing entity will establish the reserve account with the indenture trustee. The reserve account will be funded by an initial deposit on the closing date of $2,799,433.58, which equals 0.25% of the initial aggregate receivables principal balance. The “Specified Reserve Account Balance” will be the lesser of 0.25% of the initial aggregate receivables principal balance and the aggregate principal balance of the notes. On each distribution date, the amount in the reserve account will be applied as described under “The Notes—Distributions—Priorities for Applications” in this prospectus.

Overcollateralization.  The aggregate principal balance of all Receivables held by the trust will exceed the aggregate principal balance of the notes issued by the trust. See “Summary—The Receivables—Overcollateralization” in this prospectus. This excess creates credit enhancement by allowing for some amount of losses on the receivables before a shortfall in funds available to make payments on the notes would occur. As of the closing date, the initial aggregate receivables principal balance will exceed the initial aggregate principal balance of the notes by approximately 0.45%, which is $5,023,433.38. Collections on the receivables will be applied to reach or maintain, as applicable, the Overcollateralization Target Amount. The Overcollateralization Target Amount will be 1.30% of the initial aggregate receivables principal balance. See “The Notes—Distributions” in this prospectus.

The presence of a reserve account is intended to enhance the likelihood of receipt by the noteholders of the full amount of principal and interest due thereon and to decrease the likelihood that the noteholders will experience losses. The overcollateralization, reserve account and subordination of interests will not provide protection against all risks of loss and will not guarantee repayment of the entire principal balance of the notes and interest thereon. If shortfalls in available funds occur and exceed the amount covered by overcollateralization, reserve account and subordination of interests, securityholders will bear their allocable share of those deficiencies.

Investment of Funds

Collections on the receivables are held in accounts with eligible depositary institutions, which accounts are subject to the security interest of the indenture trustee for the benefit of the noteholders. These accounts will be established with the indenture trustee. All amounts held in the transaction accounts will be invested as specified in the servicing agreement.

82

The servicer will invest and reinvest collections in certain Eligible Investments. “Eligible Investments” generally include obligations of the United States, certain demand deposits, time deposits or certificates of deposit of (subject to certain eligibility requirements) any depository institution or trust company incorporated under the laws of the United States or any state thereof (or any domestic branch of a foreign bank) and subject to supervision and examination by Federal or State banking or depository institution authorities; commercial paper having, at the time of the investment or contractual commitment to invest therein, a rating from each of the hired rating agencies rating the notes in the highest investment category for short-term unsecured debt obligations or certificates of deposit granted thereby; investments in money market or common trust funds having a rating from each of the hired rating agencies rating the notes in the highest investment category for short-term unsecured debt obligations or certificates of deposit granted thereby; certain bankers’ acceptances issued by any depository institution or trust company and repurchase obligations with respect to any security that is a direct obligation of, or fully guaranteed by, the United States or any agency or instrumentality thereof the obligations of which are backed by the full faith and credit of the United States; and commercial paper master notes having, at the time of the investment or contractual commitment to invest therein, a rating from each of the hired rating agencies rating the notes in the highest investment category for short-term unsecured debt obligations. If a hired rating agency rating the notes fails to provide a rating for a specified investment, then an equivalent required deposit rating may be obtained from another nationally recognized rating agency.

Any such Eligible Investments must mature or if such Eligible Investment does not mature, be liquidated (A) not later than the business day immediately preceding the next distribution date, or (B) on such next distribution date if either (x) such investment is issued by the institution with which the Note Distribution Account is then maintained or (y) the indenture trustee (so long as the short-term unsecured debt obligations of the indenture trustee are higher than or equal to a specified level by each rating agency hired to rate the notes (such specified ratings being “R-1 (middle)” by DBRS, “F1” by Fitch, “P-1” by Moody’s and “A-1+” by Standard & Poor’s, as applicable) on the date such investment is made) will advance funds on such distribution date to the Note Distribution Account in the amount payable on such investment on such distribution date pending receipt thereof to the extent necessary to make distributions on the notes on such distribution date. Unless the indenture trustee objects prior to the time an investment is made, the indenture trustee will be deemed to have agreed to make such advance with respect to such investment.

The servicer is entitled to receive all investment earnings (net of losses and investment expenses).

The activity in the transaction accounts will be verified by the servicer and the indenture trustee.

USE OF PROCEEDS

The net proceeds to be received by the depositor from the sale of the notes on the closing date will be applied to the purchase of the receivables from Ally Bank.

CERTAIN FEES AND EXPENSES

Basic Servicing Fee	1.00% per annum
Indenture Trustee Fee	$3,000 per annum plus reasonable expenses
Owner Trustee Fee	$3,500 per annum plus reasonable expenses
Owner Trustee Certificate Administration (Tax) Fee	up to $10,000 per annum (for less than 100 holders) plus reasonable expenses
Administrator Fee	$18,000 per annum plus reasonable expenses
Asset Representations Reviewer Fee	$5,000 per annum plus reasonable expenses
Asset Representations Reviewer Receivable Review Fee	$200 per receivable

The basic servicing fee will be paid out of collections from the receivables on each distribution to the extent of available funds. In addition, the servicer also will be entitled to a supplemental servicing fee, which will not be paid out of collections, and will include late fees, prepayment charges and other administrative fees and expenses collected during the month and investment earnings on the trust accounts. The servicer is entitled to be reimbursed out of the receivables cash flows for liquidation expenses and other out-of-pocket costs related to

83

liquidation, not to exceed $300 per receivable or such greater amount as the servicer determines necessary in accordance with its customary procedures to refurbish and dispose of a financed vehicle. See “Servicing Procedures—Servicing Compensation and Payment of Expenses” in this prospectus. To the extent not paid by the servicer or the sponsor, the indenture trustee, the owner trustee, the asset representations reviewer and the administrator fees, indemnities and reasonable expenses will be paid out of collections from the receivables. If the indenture trustee assumes the role of servicer, the indenture trustee will be entitled to be paid out of collections for reimbursement of expenses incurred in assuming the role of successor servicer. The owner trustee fees related to the administration of the certificates will be paid out of collections from the receivables.

Other Fees and Expenses

The following table describes the compensation payable to the rating agencies hired to rate the notes for the period beginning with their retention and ending five years after the closing date. The sponsor will pay the rating agency fees, which include initial fees and surveillance fees. None of these fees will be paid out of the collections on the receivables. Although we do not anticipate that these fees will change while the notes are outstanding, any changes after the closing will be disclosed to investors on the issuing entity’s monthly statement to securityholders. None of the hired rating agencies retain any risk of loss with respect to the receivables.

Rating Agency Fees $ 525,000

MONEY MARKET INVESTMENTS

The Class A-1 Notes will be structured to be “eligible securities” for purchase by money market funds under Rule 2a-7 under the Investment Company Act. Rule 2a-7 includes additional criteria for investments by money market funds, including requirements relating to portfolio maturity, liquidity and risk diversification. If you are a money market fund contemplating a purchase of Class A-1 Notes, you should consult your counsel before making a purchase.

LEGAL ASPECTS OF THE RECEIVABLES

Security Interest in Vehicles

For all states in which the receivables have been originated, retail instalment sale contracts evidence the credit sale of automobiles and light trucks by dealers to purchasers. The contracts also constitute personal property security agreements and include grants of security interests in the vehicles under the Uniform Commercial Code. If Ally Bank originated the receivables directly, the direct purchase money loans would be evidenced by a promissory note and security agreement. Perfection of security interests in the vehicles is generally governed by the motor vehicle registration laws of the state in which the vehicle is located. In all states in which the receivables have been originated, a security interest in a vehicle is perfected by notation of the secured party’s lien on the vehicle’s certificate of title.

Pursuant to the pooling agreement, Ally Bank will assign its security interest in the financed vehicles securing the receivables to the depositor, and pursuant to the trust sale agreement, the depositor will assign its security interest in the financed vehicles securing the receivables to the trust and the trust will pledge its interest to the indenture trustee. However, because of the administrative burden and expense, no certificate of title will be amended to identify the trust as the new secured party relating to a financed vehicle or the interest of the indenture trustee in the financed vehicle. Also, Ally Bank will hold any certificates of title relating to the vehicles in its possession as custodian for the depositor and the trust pursuant to a custodian agreement entered into pursuant to the servicing agreement. See “The Transfer Agreements and the Servicing Agreements—Sale and Assignment of Receivables” in this prospectus.

Under the Uniform Commercial Code, a purchaser of chattel paper who takes physical possession (or, in the case of electronic chattel paper, takes control) of the chattel paper has priority over the seller and its creditors in the event of the seller’s bankruptcy. If a retail instalment sale contract is amended and the purchaser does not or is unable to take physical possession (or, in the case of electronic chattel paper, control) of the signed original

84

amendment, there is a risk that creditors of the selling dealer could have priority over the trust’s rights in the contract. The electronic contracts are stored in a specifically-designed computer system maintained by one or more third-party vendors that identify Ally Bank as the owner and establishes Ally Bank’s “control” for purposes of the Uniform Commercial Code of the electronic contracts. These third party systems use a combination of technological and administrative features that are designed to: (1) designate a single copy of the record or records comprising an electronic contract as being the single authoritative copy of the receivable; (2) manage access to and the expression of the authoritative copy, including by making such contract unalterable except in certain limited circumstances; (3) identify Ally Bank or Ally Financial as the owner of record of the authoritative copy; and (4) provide a means for transferring record ownership of, and the exclusive right of access to, the authoritative copy from the current owner of record to a successor owner of record.

An assignment of the nature of the assignment contained in each of the pooling agreement and the trust sale agreement is an effective conveyance of a security interest without amendment of any lien noted on a vehicle’s certificate of title, and the assignee succeeds by the assignment to the assignor’s rights as secured party. In the absence of fraud or forgery by the vehicle owner or Ally Bank or administrative error by state or local agencies, in most states the notation of the secured party’s lien on the certificates of title will be sufficient to protect the trust against the rights of subsequent purchasers of a financed vehicle from an obligor or subsequent lenders to an obligor who take a security interest in a financed vehicle. If there are any financed vehicles as to which Ally Bank failed to obtain a perfected security interest, its security interest would be subordinate to, among others, subsequent purchasers of the financed vehicles and holders of perfected security interests. This failure, however, would constitute a breach of the warranties of Ally Bank under the pooling agreement and, if the interests of the securityholders in the receivable are materially and adversely affected, would create an obligation of Ally Bank to repurchase that receivable unless the breach is cured. Similarly, the security interest of the trust in the vehicle could be defeated through fraud or negligence and, because the trust is not identified as the secured party on the certificate of title, by the bankruptcy petition of the obligor.

Transfer and release of security interests in the vehicles is generally governed by the motor vehicle registration laws of the state in which the vehicle is located. Failure to comply with these detailed requirements could result in liability to the trust or the release of the lien on the vehicle or other adverse consequences. Some states permit the release of a lien on a vehicle upon the presentation by the dealer, obligor or persons other than the servicer to the applicable state registrar of liens of various forms of evidence that the debt secured by the lien has been paid in full. For example, the State of New York passed legislation allowing a dealer of used motor vehicles to have the lien of a prior lienholder in a motor vehicle released, and to have a new certificate of title with respect to that motor vehicle reissued without the notation of the prior lienholder’s lien, upon submission to the Commissioner of the New York Department of Motor Vehicles of evidence that the prior lien has been satisfied. It is possible that, as a result of fraud, forgery, negligence or error, a lien on a financed vehicle could be released without prior payment in full of the receivable.

Under the laws of most states, the perfected security interest in a vehicle would continue for four months after a vehicle is moved to a state other than the state in which it is initially registered and thereafter until the vehicle owner re-registers the vehicle in the new state. A majority of states generally require surrender of a certificate of title to re-register a vehicle. Accordingly, a secured party must surrender possession if it holds the certificate of title to the vehicle or, in the case of vehicles registered in states providing for the notation of a lien on the certificate of title but not possession by the secured party, the secured party would receive notice of surrender of the certificate of title from the state department of motor vehicles. Thus, the secured party would have the opportunity to re-perfect its security interest in the vehicles in the state of relocation. In states that do not require surrender of a certificate of title for registration of a motor vehicle, re-registration could defeat perfection. In the ordinary course of servicing receivables, the servicer takes steps to effect re-perfection upon receipt of notice of re-registration or information from the obligors as to relocation. Similarly, when an obligor sells a vehicle, the servicer must surrender possession of the certificate of title or will receive notice as a result of its lien noted thereon and accordingly will have an opportunity to require satisfaction of the receivable before release of the lien. Under the servicing agreement, the servicer is obligated to take appropriate steps, at the servicer’s expense, to maintain perfection of security interests in the financed vehicles.

Under the laws of most states, liens for repairs performed on a motor vehicle and liens for unpaid taxes take priority over even a perfected security interest in a financed vehicle. The Internal Revenue Code also grants priority

85

to some federal tax liens over the lien of a secured party. The laws of some states and federal law permit the confiscation of motor vehicles by governmental authorities under some circumstances if used in unlawful activities, which may result in the loss of a secured party’s perfected security interest in the confiscated motor vehicle. Under the pooling agreement, Ally Bank will have represented to the depositor that, as of the sale date, each receivable is or will be secured by a first perfected security interest in favor of Ally Bank in the financed vehicle. The depositor will have assigned the representation, among others, to the trust pursuant to the trust sale agreement. However, liens for repairs or taxes, or the confiscation of a financed vehicle, could arise at any time during the term of a receivable. No notice will be given to the owner trustee, the indenture trustee, the trust, the noteholders or the certificateholders if a lien or confiscation arises.

Repossession

In the event of default by vehicle purchasers, the holder of the retail instalment sale contract or direct purchase money loan has all the remedies of a secured party under the Uniform Commercial Code, except where specifically limited by other state laws. Among the Uniform Commercial Code remedies, the servicer, as agent on behalf of the secured party, has the right to perform self-help repossession unless the act would constitute a breach of the peace. Self-help is the method employed by the servicer, as agent on behalf of the secured party, in most cases and is accomplished simply by retaking possession of the financed vehicle. In the event of default by the obligor, some jurisdictions require that the obligor be notified of the default and be given a time period within which he may cure the default prior to repossession. Generally, the right of reinstatement may be exercised on a limited number of occasions in any one-year period. In cases where the obligor objects or raises a defense to repossession, or if otherwise required by applicable state law, a court order must be obtained from the appropriate state court, and the vehicle must then be repossessed in accordance with that order. A secured party may be held responsible for damages caused by a wrongful repossession of a vehicle.

Notice of Sale; Redemption Rights

The Uniform Commercial Code and other state laws require the secured party to provide the obligor with reasonable notice of the date, time and place of any public sale or the date after which any private sale of the collateral may be held. In addition, a consent order between the servicer and the Federal Trade Commission imposes similar requirements for the giving of notice for any sale. The obligor has the right to redeem the collateral prior to actual sale by paying the secured party the unpaid principal balance of the obligation plus reasonable expenses for repossessing, holding and preparing the collateral for disposition and arranging for its sale, plus, in some jurisdictions, reasonable attorneys’ fees, or, in some states, by payment of delinquent installments or the unpaid balance.

Deficiency Judgments and Excess Proceeds

The proceeds of resale of the financed vehicles generally will be applied first to the expenses of resale and repossession and then to the satisfaction of the indebtedness. In many instances, the remaining principal amount of the indebtedness will exceed the proceeds. While some states impose prohibitions or limitations on deficiency judgments if the net proceeds from resale do not cover the full amount of the indebtedness, a deficiency judgment can be sought in those states that do not prohibit or limit these judgments. However, the deficiency judgment would be a personal judgment against the obligor for the shortfall, and a defaulting obligor can be expected to have very little capital or sources of income available following repossession. Therefore, in many cases, it may not be useful to seek a deficiency judgment or, if one is obtained, it may be settled at a significant discount.

Occasionally, after resale of a vehicle and payment of all expenses and all indebtedness, there is a surplus of funds. In that case, the Uniform Commercial Code requires the creditor to remit the surplus to any holder of a lien on the vehicle or if no lienholder exists or there are remaining funds, the Uniform Commercial Code and a consent order between Ally Financial and the Federal Trade Commission require the creditor to remit the surplus to the former owner of the vehicle.

86

Consumer Protection Laws

Numerous federal and state consumer protection laws and regulations impose substantial requirements upon lenders and servicers involved in consumer finance. These laws include the Truth-in-Lending Act, the Equal Credit Opportunity Act, the Federal Trade Commission Act, the Fair Credit Reporting Act, the Fair Debt Collection Procedures Act, the Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau’s Regulations B and Z, the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act of 2003, the Texas Consumer Credit Code, state adoptions of the National Consumer Act and of the Uniform Consumer Credit Code and state sales finance and other similar laws. Also, state laws impose finance charge ceilings and other restrictions on consumer transactions and require contract disclosures in addition to those required under federal law. These requirements impose specific statutory liabilities upon creditors who fail to comply with their provisions. In some cases, this liability could affect an assignee’s ability to enforce consumer finance contracts, including the receivables. If a seller of receivables is not liable for indemnifying the trust as assignee of the receivables from the seller, failure to comply could impose liability on an assignee in excess of the amount of the receivable.

The so-called “holder-in-due-course rule” of the Federal Trade Commission, the provisions of which are generally duplicated by the Uniform Consumer Credit Code, other state statutes or the common law, has the effect of subjecting a seller in a consumer credit transaction, and some creditors and their assignees, to all claims and defenses which the obligor in the transaction could assert against the seller of goods. Liability under the holder-in-due-course rule is limited to the amounts paid by the obligor under the contract and the holder of the contract may also be unable to collect any balance remaining due thereunder from the obligor.

Most of the receivables will be subject to the requirements of the holder-in-due-course rule. The trust, as holder of the receivables, will be subject to any claims or defenses that the purchaser of the financed vehicle may assert against the seller of the financed vehicle. These claims are limited to a maximum liability equal to the amounts paid by the obligor on the receivable. If an obligor were successful in asserting these claims or defenses, these claims or defenses would constitute a breach of Ally Bank’s warranties under the pooling agreement and may create an obligation of Ally Bank to repurchase the receivable unless the breach is cured in all material respects. See “The Transfer Agreements and the Servicing Agreements—Sale and Assignment of Receivables” in this prospectus.

Courts have imposed general equitable principles upon secured parties pursuing repossession and litigation involving deficiency balances. These equitable principles may have the effect of relieving an obligor from some or all of the legal consequences of a default.

In several cases, consumers have asserted that the self-help remedies of secured parties under the Uniform Consumer Credit Code and laws violate the due process protections provided under the 14th Amendment to the Constitution of the United States. Courts have generally upheld the notice provisions of the Uniform Commercial Code and laws as reasonable or have found that the repossession and resale by the creditor do not involve sufficient state action to afford constitutional protection to consumers.

Under the pooling agreement, Ally Bank will represent to the depositor that each receivable complies with all requirements of law in all material respects. The depositor will have assigned the representation, among others, to the trust. Accordingly, if an obligor has a claim against the trust for violation of any law and that claim materially and adversely affects the trust’s interest in a receivable, the violation may create an obligation to repurchase the receivable unless the breach is cured in all material respects. See “The Transfer Agreements and the Servicing Agreements—Sale and Assignment of the Receivables” in this prospectus.

Other Limitations

In addition to the laws limiting or prohibiting deficiency judgments, numerous other statutory provisions, including federal bankruptcy laws and state laws, may interfere with or affect the ability of a secured party to realize upon collateral or to enforce a deficiency judgment. For example, in a Chapter 13 proceeding under the federal bankruptcy law, a court may prevent a creditor from repossessing the financed vehicle, and, as part of the rehabilitation plan, reduce the amount of the secured indebtedness to the market value of the financed vehicle at the time of bankruptcy, leaving the creditor as a general unsecured creditor for the remainder of the indebtedness. A

87

bankruptcy court may also reduce the monthly payments due under a contract or change the rate of finance charge and time of repayment of the indebtedness.

Transfer of Vehicles

Each receivable prohibits the sale or transfer of the related vehicle without the servicer’s consent. Upon a sale or transfer of the financed vehicle without the servicer’s consent, the servicer is permitted to accelerate the maturity of the receivable. The servicer will not consent to a sale or transfer and will require prepayment of the receivable. Although the servicer, as agent of the trust, may enter into a transfer of equity agreement with the secondary purchaser for the purpose of effecting the transfer of the vehicle, the new obligation will not be included in the pool of receivables.

INSOLVENCY ASPECTS OF THE OFFERINGS

Potentially Applicable Insolvency Regimes

Three different legal regimes for the resolution or reorganization of insolvent companies could be applicable to the entities involved in an offering of notes:

• The Federal Deposit Insurance Act, or “FDIA,” provides that the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, or “FDIC,” can be appointed as the receiver or conservator for an insured depository institution that becomes insolvent, is in an unsound condition, violates its bylaws or regulations or engages in similar activity. Thus, if these circumstances occur to Ally Bank, the FDIC could be appointed as receiver (which term, as used herein with respect to the FDIA, should be understood also to encompass the role of conservator).

• The federal Bankruptcy Code is available for any “person” that is eligible to be a “debtor” pursuant to Section 109 of the Bankruptcy Code. Ally Bank would not be eligible to be a debtor under the Bankruptcy Code, but the depositor would be an eligible debtor. There is some question as to whether the trust would qualify as a “person” under the Bankruptcy Code, as the only trusts that have been permitted to seek protection under the Bankruptcy Code are “business trusts.”

• The Dodd-Frank Act established the Orderly Liquidation Authority, or “OLA,” under which the FDIC is authorized to act as receiver of a “covered financial company” and, under certain circumstances, its subsidiaries, except that insolvencies of insured depository institutions will continue to be governed by the FDIA. For a company to be classified as a covered financial company, the Secretary of the Treasury must make several determinations, including that the company is in default or in danger of default and that the failure of the company and its resolution under the Bankruptcy Code would have serious adverse effects on financial stability in the United States. We cannot predict whether, if Ally Financial were in default or in danger of default, it would be classified as a covered financial company. If Ally Financial were so classified, then the depositor or an issuing entity could, under the circumstances specified in the Dodd-Frank Act, also be subject to FDIC receivership under OLA as a covered subsidiary.

Consequences of Insolvency Regimes for Payments on the Notes

The FDIC, as receiver under the FDIA or OLA, and a bankruptcy trustee or a debtor-in-possession under the Bankruptcy Code, have broadly similar powers. The exercise of these powers could result in losses or delays in payment on the notes.

If an offering failed to qualify for the safe harbor described under “—The FDIC Rule,” the FDIC as receiver under the FDIA could assert that Ally Bank’s sale of receivables to the depositor should be recharacterized as a pledge of the receivables to secure a borrowing of Ally Bank, and the FDIC could seek to recover or reclaim the receivables.

88

The possibility also exists that the FDIC as receiver could seek to apply the doctrine of substantive consolidation to consolidate the assets and liabilities of the depositor and, in turn, the trust with the assets and liabilities of Ally Bank.

Independently or in conjunction with the assertion of either of these positions, the FDIC as receiver could seek to:

• repudiate the obligations of Ally Bank under the transaction documents, including ongoing servicing obligations under the servicing agreement, such as Ally Bank’s duty to collect and remit payments or otherwise service the receivables;

• prior to any repudiation of the servicing agreement, prevent the indenture trustee or the securityholders from appointing a successor servicer;

• require the trust, as assignee of the depositor, to go through an administrative claims procedure to establish its rights to payments collected on the receivables;

• request a stay of proceedings to liquidate claims or otherwise enforce contractual and legal remedies against Ally Bank; or

• impose a statutory injunction that would automatically prevent the indenture trustee and other transaction parties from exercising their rights, remedies and interests under the transaction documents (including the servicing agreement) for up to 90 days.

In addition to an FDIA receivership of Ally Bank, it is possible that the depositor or the trust (each, a “special purpose entity”) could (a) become a debtor in a voluntary or involuntary case under the Bankruptcy Code or state insolvency regimes or (b) become subject to a receivership under OLA. The bankruptcy trustee or debtor-in-possession in such a bankruptcy case or, in certain cases, the FDIC as receiver under OLA could seek to:

• in a bankruptcy case, reject the executory obligations of the debtor under the transaction documents;

• under OLA, repudiate the obligations of the special purpose entity under the transaction documents;

• enforce the “automatic stay” to prevent creditors from exercising remedies against a debtor;

• effect a substitution of collateral in certain circumstances; or

• assert that the trust does not have a perfected security interest in (a) the receivables, (b) one or more of the vehicles securing the receivables or (c) any cash collections held by the servicer at the time the servicer becomes the subject of a bankruptcy proceeding.

Despite the broad similarity of OLA to the Bankruptcy Code, OLA differs on its face from the Bankruptcy Code in many respects. To address some of these differences, the FDIC in July 2011 adopted a regulation confirming that the treatment under OLA of preferential transfers is intended to be consistent with similar provisions in and doctrines developed under the Bankruptcy Code. In January 2011 the Acting General Counsel of the FDIC issued an advisory opinion to the same effect with respect to the treatment of standard contractual provisions meant to foster the bankruptcy-remote treatment of special purpose entities such as the depositor and the issuing entity. The advisory opinion does not bind the FDIC or its Board of Directors and could be withdrawn or modified in the future. There can be no assurance that future regulations or, with respect to the matters covered by the advisory opinion, subsequent FDIC actions in an OLA proceeding involving Ally Financial or either special purpose entity will not be contrary to these developments. Moreover, many provisions of OLA and other parts of the Dodd-Frank Act will be implemented or interpreted through rulemaking by the appropriate federal regulatory agencies. As such, in many respects, the ultimate impact of the OLA provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act, and of the Dodd-Frank Act overall, will not be known for an extended period of time.

89

Bankruptcy of the Trust

It is unclear as to whether the trust is eligible to be the subject of a bankruptcy case. If it is, then the trust may be subject to a liquidation or reorganization under federal bankruptcy law.

Only a “person” as defined in the Bankruptcy Code can be a debtor eligible for federal bankruptcy relief. The Bankruptcy Code defines “person” to “include” a “corporation” and “corporation” to “include” a “business trust.” The legislative history of the Bankruptcy Code, however, indicates that the term “person” does not otherwise include a trust. Therefore, the trust’s eligibility as a debtor under the Bankruptcy Code depends on whether or not it would be found to be a “business trust” by the court determining eligibility.

Case law indicates that whether or not a statutory trust will qualify as a business trust depends on whether the trust is actually operating a business or at least has a business or profit-making objective. Some cases have required additional elements, such as the transferability of the beneficial interests in the trust. Other decisions have highlighted whether the trust was created for the benefit and profit of investor beneficiaries.

A reasonable argument can be made that the trust engages in activities that will qualify it as a business trust, and thus, a “corporation” and a “person” eligible to be a “debtor” under federal bankruptcy law. The trust is structured as an enterprise for profit. Interests in the trust may be sold and transferred. The trust will acquire financial assets from the depositor, sell notes and certificates, invest and reinvest collections from such financial assets, and perform ancillary business activities with the ultimate purpose of creating a profitable return for the noteholders and enhancing the value of the investment of the certificateholders in the issuing entity.

If the trust were to be subject to bankruptcy proceedings, noteholders and certificateholders could experience losses or delays in the payments on the securities as explained above.

If, on the other hand, a court were to find that the trust does not qualify as an eligible “debtor” under the Bankruptcy Code, then such court would likely dismiss any actions against the trust that are predicated on the trust being eligible as a “debtor” pursuant to Section 109 of the Bankruptcy Code.

Trust Receivership under OLA

If the trust were placed in receivership under OLA as a covered subsidiary of Ally Financial, and the FDIC were to repudiate the notes issued by the trust, the FDIC would be liable for compensatory damages. The damages would be no greater than the principal balance of the notes plus accrued interest as of the date the FDIC was appointed receiver plus, to the extent of the amount by which value of the property that secured the notes exceeds the principal amount of the notes and accrued interest through the date of repudiation or disaffirmance, for the additional accrued interest to the date of repudiation or disaffirmance. However, creditors of the trust in such a situation would not be entitled to receive more than the amount that would have been payable to such creditors if the trust had instead been liquidated under Chapter 7 of the Bankruptcy Code.

Measures to Avoid Insolvency Proceedings With Respect to Special Purpose Entities

The transaction documents contain provisions, and each special purpose entity has taken steps in structuring the transactions contemplated by this prospectus, that are intended to make it unlikely in the case of either (a) a receivership of Ally Bank under the FDIA or (b) a voluntary or involuntary case in which a special purpose entity was the debtor under the Bankruptcy Code or similar applicable state laws, that a court would approve consolidation of the assets and liabilities of a special purpose entity with those of Ally Bank. These steps include the creation of each special purpose entity under its respective formation documents as a limited-purpose entity that is subject to various limitations. These limitations include restrictions on the nature of the business of each special purpose entity and a restriction on the ability of each special purpose entity to commence a voluntary case or proceeding under the Bankruptcy Code or similar proceeding under applicable state laws without, in the case of the depositor, the unanimous affirmative vote of all of its directors or, in the case of the trust, the approval of the owner trustee, the noteholders and the certificateholders. The depositor is required to have at least one director who qualifies under its limited liability agreement as an “Independent Director.” In addition, the depositor makes certain

90

covenants which are intended to ensure that its assets and operations are separate and distinct from those of Ally Bank and to minimize the risk of substantive consolidation. There can be no assurance that the measures described herein will be effective or that they will prevent any special purpose entity from being subject to an FDIC receivership under OLA.

The transaction documents contain covenants pursuant to which the indenture trustee and the sponsor agree not to acquiesce, petition, invoke or otherwise cause the depositor or an issuing entity to be subject to a case under any federal or state bankruptcy, insolvency or other similar proceeding before the date that is one year and one day after the repayment of all notes. Similarly, the transaction documents contain covenants pursuant to which the indenture trustee, the servicer and the sponsor agree not to acquiesce, petition, invoke or otherwise cause the trust to be subject to a case under any federal or state bankruptcy, insolvency or other similar proceeding before the date that is one year and one day after the repayment of all notes.

FDIC Rule

The FDIC has adopted a regulation entitled “Treatment of financial assets transferred in connection with a securitization or participation” (the “FDIC Rule”). The FDIC Rule contains four different safe harbors, each of which limits the powers that the FDIC can exercise in the insolvency of an insured depository institution when it is appointed as receiver or conservator (and references in this section to the FDIC are in its capacity as such). See “—Consequences of Insolvency Regimes for Payments on the Notes” above for a discussion of the FDIC’s powers. There are two safe harbors that could apply to a securitization under this prospectus. One safe harbor applies to transactions that meet the conditions for sale accounting treatment, and the other applies to transactions that do not meet the conditions for sale accounting treatment. It is not clear whether the FDIC would evaluate the accounting treatment on the closing date, the date of insolvency or another date.

To qualify for a safe harbor, the securitization or participation must satisfy the preconditions specified for that type of transaction. If one or more of these preconditions are not met, the limitations imposed by the FDIC Rule on the FDIC’s powers would not apply. The preconditions imposed by the FDIC Rule include provisions that are required to be contained in the documentation for the securitization. These provisions limit the structural features of the transaction in specified ways and impose obligations on one or more of the trust and the depositor (which entities are jointly considered to be the “issuing entity” for purposes of the FDIC Rule), the servicer and the sponsor to make specified disclosures, provide ongoing reporting on specified items and define specified aspects of the relationships among the parties. In order to satisfy the requirements of the FDIC Rule to include these provisions in the documentation, each indenture will contain a covenant (the “FDIC Rule Covenant”) that contains the requisite provisions and that obligates the issuing entity to perform each of the specified obligations, other than those obligations that are specifically assigned exclusively to the servicer or the sponsor. See “The Notes—The Indenture—FDIC Rule Covenant.” Each of the transfer agreement, servicing agreement and indenture obligate the depositor, the sponsor and the servicer to perform its specified functions under the FDIC Rule Covenant. The failure of the issuing entity to perform its obligations under the FDIC Rule Covenant does not constitute an event of default, nor does the failure of the servicer to perform its obligations under the FDIC Rule Covenant constitute a servicer default. However, the noteholders and the indenture trustee retain the right to exercise any other remedies permitted by the indenture or applicable law in respect of these breaches.

If the FDIC is appointed as conservator or receiver for an insured depository institution that has effected a securitization that is covered by the FDIC Rule, there are several possible series of events that could occur. The FDIC will succeed to the obligations of the depository institution, whether as servicer, sponsor or otherwise. If the transaction satisfies the conditions for sale accounting treatment, then the FDIC could disaffirm or repudiate the ongoing contractual obligations of Ally Bank (including its obligations under the servicing agreement). However, the FDIC could not seek to reclaim or recover the receivables or other financial assets transferred to the trust. Additionally, the FDIC could challenge the sale accounting treatment of Ally Bank or the compliance by Ally Bank with the FDIC Rule.

If the transaction does not satisfy the conditions for sale accounting treatment, and the FDIC becomes the servicer or otherwise controls distributions of collections, the FDIC would have the choice of whether or not to pay or apply collections from the financial assets in accordance with the applicable securitization documents. If the FDIC chooses not to pay or apply the collections, it will be in monetary default, and the indenture trustee (at the

91

direction of the holders of 25% of the aggregate principal amount of the Controlling Class), the servicer or a noteholder will be entitled to deliver a notice to the FDIC requesting the exercise of contractual rights under the transaction documents because of the FDIC’s monetary default. If the FDIC does not cure the monetary default within ten business days, then the FDIC will have consented to the exercise of those contractual rights. However, the FDIC is not required to take any action other than providing consents, waivers and execution of transfer documents.

Another series of events for a transaction that does not satisfy the conditions for sale accounting could occur if, following an insolvency, the FDIC seeks to exercise its power to repudiate contracts. The FDIC Rule gives the FDIC the choice, following repudiation, either to pay damages within ten business days or to permit the exercise of contractual rights. If the FDIC elects to pay damages, it is obligated to pay noteholders an amount equal to the par value of the notes outstanding on the date of appointment of the FDIC, less any payments of principal received by the noteholders through the date of repudiation, plus unpaid, accrued interest through the date of repudiation in accordance with the transaction documents to the extent actually received through collections received through the date of repudiation. If the damages paid by the FDIC do not include interest from the date of repudiation to the date of payment, the indenture provides that the indenture trustee, at the direction of the servicer, should apply available funds from the reserve account and the collection account to pay such shortfall. However, upon payment of these damages, the FDIC Rule provides that “all liens or claims on the financial assets created pursuant to the securitization documents shall be released.” If the FDIC were to assert successfully that the lien of the indenture trustee on the reserve account and the collection account were released and the assets in those accounts were transferred to the FDIC, then noteholders would suffer a loss.

Damages paid by the FDIC will be distributed to noteholders on the earlier of (1) the next distribution date on which such damages could be distributed and (2) the earliest practicable date that the indenture trustee could declare a special distribution date, subject to applicable provisions of the indenture, applicable law and the procedures of any applicable clearing agency. The indenture trustee will be authorized and instructed to maintain possession and control of any reserve account, the collection account and all amounts on deposit therein. If the date on which damages are to be distributed to noteholders is not a regular distribution date, then the amount of interest payable to the noteholders will be prorated to such date, as provided in the indenture. The servicer will instruct the indenture trustee to use amounts on deposit in any reserve account and the collection account, in addition to the amounts paid by the FDIC, to pay amounts owing to noteholders.

The transfers by Ally Bank of the receivables and the issuance by each issuing entity of the notes are intended to satisfy all the applicable conditions of the FDIC Rule, and the trust will state in the indenture its belief that those preconditions will have been met. As the FDIC Rule is an untested regulation, its interpretation remains uncertain. If any provision of the FDIC Rule is amended, or any interpretive guidance regarding the FDIC Rule is provided by the FDIC or its staff, as a result of which an issuing entity determines that an amendment to the FDIC Rule Covenant is necessary or desirable, then that issuing entity and the indenture trustee will be authorized to amend the FDIC Rule Covenant in accordance with such FDIC Rule amendment or guidance. No noteholder consent will be required.

One of the preconditions imposed by the FDIC Rule is a “risk retention” requirement. The risk retention that will be held by the depositor or another majority-owned affiliate of the sponsor as described under “Credit Risk Retention” in this prospectus will satisfy the FDIC Rule’s risk retention requirement. The sponsor must also give notice to the noteholders within a reasonable time after the sponsor changes the amount or the terms under which credit risk is retained, and the parties to the indenture are entitled to amend the FDIC Rule Covenant to comply with the regulation’s minimum requirements without noteholder consent.

THE DEPOSITOR

Ally Auto Assets LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of Ally Bank, was organized in the State of Delaware on August 18, 2009. The depositor, a limited liability company, is organized for the limited purposes of purchasing retail instalment sale contracts, direct purchase money loans, leases and other sale contracts and installment obligations related to motor vehicles, monies due thereunder, security interests in any related vehicles and other collateral securing such obligations, proceeds from claims on insurance policies related thereto and notes, certificates and other interests secured by any of the foregoing from Ally Bank, transferring the purchased assets to third parties, forming trusts and engaging in similar activities for multiple securitizations of retail instalment sale

92

contracts and leases on an ongoing basis. The principal executive offices of the depositor are located at Corporation Trust Center, 1209 Orange Street, Wilmington, Delaware 19801.

The depositor and the securitization transactions are structured in a manner intended to limit or eliminate the ability of the FDIC, acting as conservator or receiver for Ally Bank, to exercise authority with respect to the receivables and the transaction documents. This structure includes the creation of the depositor as a separate, limited-purpose subsidiary pursuant to a limited liability company agreement containing various limitations. These limitations include restrictions on the nature of the depositor’s business and a restriction on the depositor’s ability to commence a voluntary case or proceeding under the United States Bankruptcy Code or similar applicable state laws without the unanimous affirmative vote of all of its directors. At any time that any notes, certificates or other securities of any subsidiary of the depositor or any other indebtedness, liability or obligation of the depositor is outstanding, the depositor is required to have at least one director who qualifies under its limited liability company agreement as an “Independent Director.”

If, notwithstanding the foregoing measures, the FDIC concluded that it should exercise authority with respect to the receivables or the transaction documents, or a filing were made under the United States Bankruptcy Code or similar applicable state laws by or against the depositor, or an attempt were made to litigate the issue of substantive consolidation with respect to the depositor and Ally Bank, then delays in distributions on the notes and the certificates, and possible reductions in the amount of these distributions, could occur. See also “Insolvency Aspects of the Offerings” in this prospectus.

The depositor may retain or sell all or a portion of the certificates (other than the EVI) and may also retain all or a portion of one or more classes of notes issued by the trust as described under “The Trust—Capitalization of the Trust” in this prospectus. In addition, the depositor has ongoing obligations to repurchase warranty receivables from the trust and to authorize, execute or file financing statements relating to the receivables, all as further described in “The Transfer Agreements and the Servicing Agreements.”

CEO Certification

The chief executive officer of the depositor will provide specified certifications regarding the disclosures contained in this prospectus, the receivables, the offered notes and the structure of this securitization transaction. The chief executive officer’s certification will be filed with the final prospectus.

THE INDENTURE TRUSTEE

Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas (“DBTCA”) is the indenture trustee under the indenture. DBTCA is a New York banking corporation and has acted as indenture trustee on numerous asset-backed securities transactions, including acting as indenture trustee on various auto loan and auto lease securitization transactions. While the structure of the transactions referred to in the preceding sentence may differ among these transactions, DBTCA is experienced in administering transactions of this kind. Correspondence may be directed to the indenture trustee at its corporate trust office located at Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas c/o Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, Institutional Cash & Securities Services, 100 Plaza One—MS: JCY03-0699, Jersey City, New Jersey 07311, Attn: Ally Auto Receivables Trust 2018-1.

DBTCA, the indenture trustee, and Deutsche Bank National Trust Company (“DBNTC”) have been sued by investors in civil litigation concerning their role as trustees of certain residential mortgage backed securities (“RMBS”) trusts.

On June 18, 2014, a group of investors, including funds managed by Blackrock Advisors, LLC, PIMCO-Advisors, L.P., and others, filed a derivative action against DBNTC and DBTCA in New York State Supreme Court purportedly on behalf of and for the benefit of 544 private-label RMBS trusts asserting claims for alleged violations of the Trust Indenture Act, breach of contract, breach of fiduciary duty and negligence based on DBNTC and DBTCA’s alleged failure to perform their duties as trustees for the trusts. Plaintiffs subsequently dismissed their state court complaint and filed a derivative and class action complaint in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York on behalf of and for the benefit of 564 private-label RMBS trusts, which substantially

93

overlapped with the trusts at issue in the state court action. The complaint alleges that the trusts at issue have suffered total realized collateral losses of U.S. $89.4 billion, but the complaint does not include a demand for money damages in a sum certain. DBNTC and DBTCA filed a motion to dismiss, and on January 19, 2016, the court partially granted the motion on procedural grounds: as to the 500 trusts that are governed by pooling and servicing agreements, the court declined to exercise jurisdiction. The court did not rule on substantive defenses asserted in the motion to dismiss. On March 22, 2016, plaintiffs filed an amended complaint in federal court. In the amended complaint, in connection with 62 trusts governed by indenture agreements, plaintiffs assert claims for breach of contract, violation of the Trust Indenture Act, breach of fiduciary duty, and breach of duty to avoid conflicts of interest. The amended complaint alleges that the trusts at issue have suffered total realized collateral losses of U.S. $9.8 billion, but the complaint does not include a demand for money damages in a sum certain. On July 15, 2016, DBNTC and DBTCA filed a motion to dismiss the amended complaint. On January 23, 2017, the court granted in part and denied in part DBNTC and DBTCA’s motion to dismiss. The court granted the motion to dismiss with respect to plaintiffs’ conflict-of-interest claim, thereby dismissing it, and denied the motion to dismiss with respect to plaintiffs’ breach of contract claim (except as noted below) and claim for violation of the Trust Indenture Act, thereby allowing those claims to proceed. On January 26, 2017, the parties filed a joint stipulation and proposed order dismissing plaintiffs’ claim for breach of fiduciary duty. On January 27, 2017, the court entered the parties’ joint stipulation and ordered that plaintiffs’ claim for breach of fiduciary duty be dismissed. On February 3, 2017, following a hearing concerning DBNTC and DBTCA’s motion to dismiss on February 2, 2017, the court issued a short form order dismissing (i) plaintiffs’ representation and warranty claims as to 21 trusts whose originators or sponsors had entered bankruptcy and the deadline for asserting claims against such originators or sponsors had passed as of 2009 and (ii) plaintiffs’ claims to the extent they were premised upon any alleged pre-Event of Default duty to terminate servicers. On March 27, 2017, DBNTC and DBTCA filed an answer to the amended complaint. Discovery is ongoing.

On March 25, 2016, the BlackRock plaintiffs filed a state court action against DBTCA in the Superior Court of California, Orange County with respect to 513 trusts. On May 18, 2016, plaintiffs filed an amended complaint with respect to 465 trusts, and included DBNTC as an additional defendant. The amended complaint asserts three causes of action: breach of contract; breach of fiduciary duty; and breach of the duty to avoid conflicts of interest. Plaintiffs purport to bring the action on behalf of themselves and all other current owners of certificates in the 465 trusts. The amended complaint alleges that the trusts at issue have suffered total realized collateral losses of U.S. $75.7 billion, but does not include a demand for money damages in a sum certain. On August 22, 2016, DBNTC and DBTCA filed a demurrer as to plaintiffs’ breach of fiduciary duty cause of action and breach of the duty to avoid conflicts of interest cause of action and motion to strike as to plaintiffs’ breach of contract cause of action. On October 18, 2016, the court granted DBNTC and DBTCA’s demurrer, providing plaintiffs with thirty days’ leave to amend, and denied DBNTC and DBTCA’s motion to strike. Plaintiffs did not further amend their complaint and, on December 19, 2016, DBNTC and DBTCA filed an answer to the amended complaint. Discovery is ongoing.

On September 27, 2017, DBTCA was added as a defendant to a case brought by certain special purpose entities including Phoenix Light SF Limited in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, in which the plaintiffs previously alleged incorrectly that DBNTC served as trustee for all 43 of the trusts at issue. On September 27, 2017, plaintiffs filed a third amended complaint that names DBTCA as a defendant in addition to DBNTC. DBTCA serves as trustee for one of the 43 trusts at issue. DBNTC serves as trustee for the other 42 trusts at issue. Plaintiffs’ third amended complaint brings claims for violation of the Trust Indenture Act; breach of contract; breach of fiduciary duty; negligence and gross negligence; violation of the Streit Act; and breach of the covenant of good faith. However, in the third amended complaint, plaintiffs acknowledge that, before DBTCA was added to the case, the court dismissed plaintiffs’ Trust Indenture Act claims, negligence and gross negligence claims, Streit Act claims, claims for breach of the covenant of good faith, and certain theories of plaintiffs’ breach of contract claims, and plaintiffs only include these claims to preserve any rights on appeal. Plaintiffs allege damages of “hundreds of millions of dollars.” On November 13, 2017, DBNTC and DBTCA filed an answer to the third amended complaint. Discovery is ongoing.

On November 30, 2017, DBTCA was added as a defendant to a case brought by Commerzbank AG (“Commerzbank”) in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, in which Commerzbank previously alleged incorrectly that DBNTC served as trustee for all 50 of the trusts at issue. On November 30, 2017, Commerzbank filed a second amended complaint that names DBTCA as a defendant in addition to DBNTC.

94

DBTCA serves as trustee for 1 of the 50 trusts at issue. DBNTC serves as trustee for the other 49 trusts at issue. Commerzbank’s second amended complaint brings claims for violation of the Trust Indenture Act; breach of contract; breach of fiduciary duty; negligence; violation of the Streit Act; and breach of the covenant of good faith. However, in the second amended complaint, Commerzbank acknowledges that, before DBTCA was added to the case, the court dismissed Commerzbank’s Trust Indenture Act claims for the trusts governed by pooling and servicing agreements, as well as its Streit Act claims and claims for breach of the covenant of good faith, and Commerzbank only includes these claims to preserve any rights on appeal. The second amended complaint alleges that DBNTC and DBTCA caused Commerzbank to suffer “hundreds of millions of dollars in losses,” but the complaint does not include a demand for money damages in a sum certain. Discovery is ongoing.

On December 30, 2015, IKB International, S.A. in Liquidation and IKB Deutsche Industriebank A.G. (collectively, “IKB”), as an investor in 37 RMBS trusts, filed a summons with notice in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, New York County, against DBNTC and DBTCA as trustees of the trusts. On May 27, 2016, IKB served its complaint asserting claims for breach of contract, breach of fiduciary duty, breach of duty to avoid conflicts of interest, violation of New York’s Streit Act, violation of the Trust Indenture Act, violation of Regulation AB and violation of Section 9 of the Uniform Commercial Code. IKB alleges that DBNTC and DBTCA are liable for over U.S. $268 million in damages. On October 5, 2016, DBNTC and DBTCA, together with several other trustees defending lawsuits by IKB, filed a joint motion to dismiss. On January 6, 2017, IKB filed a notice of discontinuance, voluntarily dismissing with prejudice all claims as to three trusts. As of January 17, 2017, DBNTC and DBTCA’s motion to dismiss has been briefed and is awaiting decision by the court. On June 20, 2017, the parties filed a stipulation, voluntarily dismissing with prejudice all claims as to four additional trusts. Certain limited discovery is permitted to go forward while the motion to dismiss is pending.

DBTCA has no pending legal proceedings (including, based on DBTCA’s present evaluation, the litigation disclosed in the foregoing paragraphs) that would materially affect its ability to perform its duties as indenture trustee under the indenture for this transaction.

The trust will grant to the indenture trustee all right, title and interest of the trust in, to and under the collateral listed on the schedule of receivables. That grant will include all rights and powers, but none of the obligations, if any, of the trust under any agreement or instrument included in the collateral, including the immediate and continuing right to claim for, collect, receive and give receipt for principal and interest payments in respect of the receivables included in the collateral and all other monies payable under the collateral.

On each distribution date, the indenture trustee is required to notify the holder of the note distribution account to distribute to the noteholders all amounts on deposit in that account other than investment earnings, which the servicer is entitled to retain. If required by the Trust Indenture Act of 1939, as amended, the indenture trustee will mail to each noteholder summaries of any necessary information, documents or reports. So long as no default or event of default is continuing the indenture trustee or other account holder is required to invest and reinvest all funds in the collection account and the reserve account, to the extent specified in the servicing agreement, in Eligible Investments.

If any default occurs in the making of any payment or performance under any agreement or instrument that is part of the trust estate, the indenture trustee may take such action as may be appropriate to enforce such payment or performance, including the institution and prosecution of appropriate proceedings. If a default occurs and is continuing and if it is known to a responsible officer of the indenture trustee, the indenture trustee is required to mail to each noteholder notice of the default within the later of (a) 90 days after it occurs and (b) 10 days after it is known to a responsible officer of the indenture trustee. Except in the case of a default in payment of principal of or interest on any note, the indenture trustee may withhold the notice if and so long as a committee of its responsible officers in good faith determines that withholding the notice is in the interests of noteholders.

The indenture trustee will be required to mail each year to all noteholders, to the extent required under the Trust Indenture Act, a brief report relating to its eligibility and qualification to continue as indenture trustee under the indenture, a description of any amounts advanced by it under the indenture, the amount, interest rate and maturity date of some types of indebtedness owing by the trust to the indenture trustee in its individual capacity, the property and funds physically held by the indenture trustee and any action taken by it that materially affects the notes and that has not been previously reported.

95

Subject to the provisions for indemnification and to limitations contained in the indenture, the holders of a majority in aggregate principal amount of the Controlling Class will have the right to direct the time, method and place of conducting any proceeding for any remedy available to the indenture trustee and the holders of a majority in aggregate principal amount. The indenture trustee will be under no obligation to exercise any of the rights or powers under the indenture at the request or direction of any of the holders of those notes, if the indenture trustee reasonably believes it will not be adequately indemnified against the costs, expenses and liabilities which might be incurred by it in complying with the request. The indenture trustee also will not be required to take action in response to requests, demands or directions of the noteholders, other than requests, demands or directions relating to an asset representations review, unless the noteholders have offered reasonable security or indemnity satisfactory to the indenture trustee to protect it against the costs and expenses that it may incur in complying with the request, demand or direction.

The indenture trustee will not be liable for any action it takes or omits to take in good faith which it believes to be authorized or within its rights or powers so long as the indenture trustee’s conduct does not constitute willful misconduct, negligence or bad faith. In addition, the indenture trustee will not be liable for interest on any money received by it except if it agrees in writing with the trust and will have no liability or responsibility for the acts or omissions of any other party to any of the transaction documents. The indenture trustee does not have any obligation to independently verify or confirm any underlying data.

The indenture trustee may give notice of its intent to resign at any time, in which event the trust will be obligated to appoint a successor indenture trustee. The trust may also remove the indenture trustee if the indenture trustee ceases to be eligible to continue as indenture trustee under the indenture or if the indenture trustee becomes insolvent or otherwise becomes incapable of acting. In these circumstances, the trust will be obligated to appoint a successor indenture trustee. The holders of a majority in outstanding amount of the Controlling Class also have the right to remove the indenture trustee and appoint a successor. Any resignation or removal of the indenture trustee and appointment of a successor indenture trustee does not become effective until acceptance of the appointment by the successor indenture trustee.

THE OWNER TRUSTEE

BNY Mellon Trust of Delaware is the owner trustee under the trust agreement. BNY Mellon Trust of Delaware is a Delaware banking corporation and an affiliate of The Bank of New York Mellon, a New York banking corporation, which provides support services on its behalf in this transaction. Its principal place of business is located at 301 Bellevue Parkway, 3rd Floor, Wilmington, Delaware 19809, Attention: Corporate Trust Administration. BNY Mellon Trust of Delaware has acted as owner trustee on numerous asset-backed transactions (with The Bank of New York Mellon providing administrative support), including the structure of the transaction referred to herein. While the structure of each transaction may differ, BNY Mellon Trust of Delaware and The Bank of New York Mellon on its behalf are experienced in administering transactions of this kind. You may contact BNY Mellon Trust of Delaware by calling (302) 791-3610.

In the ordinary course of business, The Bank of New York Mellon is named as a defendant in or made a party to pending and potential legal actions. In connection with its role as trustee of certain RMBS transactions, The Bank of New York Mellon has been named as a defendant in a number of legal actions brought by RMBS investors. These lawsuits allege that the trustee had expansive duties under the governing agreements, including the duty to investigate and pursue breach of representation and warranty claims against other parties to the RMBS transactions. While it is inherently difficult to predict the eventual outcomes of pending actions, The Bank of New York Mellon denies liability and intends to defend the litigations vigorously.

The owner trustee may, in the name of the trust, conduct the business of the trust, make and execute contracts and other instruments on behalf of the trust and sue and be sued on behalf of the trust. The owner trustee, acting on behalf of the trust, has discretion to decide whether to engage any person in assisting the trust in performing its duties under the indenture or the trust agreement. The consent of certificateholders holding in the aggregate more than a majority of the voting interests of the certificates as of the close of the preceding distribution date is needed to require the owner trustee to take action. Upon notification to the certificateholders, and unless such certificateholders have notified the owner trustee that such consent is withheld, the owner trustee may initiate or compromise any action or claim involving the trust, amend the indenture or administration agreement, or appoint

96

certain successor agents. The owner trustee will be required to give prompt written notice to the certificateholders upon any termination of, or appointment of a successor to, the servicer.

The owner trustee’s liability in connection with the issuance and sale of the notes and certificates is limited solely to the express obligations of the owner trustee set forth in the trust agreement governing the trust. The owner trustee will not be liable for the default or failure of any of the administrator, the trust, servicer or other trustees to carry out their respective obligations under any of the transaction documents, nor will the owner trustee be liable under any transaction document under any circumstances, except for its own negligent action, its own negligent failure to act or its own willful misconduct in the performance of any act. The owner trustee may resign at any time, in which event the administrator, or its successor, will be obligated to appoint a successor owner trustee. The administrator of the trust may also remove the owner trustee if the owner trustee ceases to be eligible to continue as owner trustee under the trust agreement or if the owner trustee becomes insolvent. In those circumstances, the administrator will be obligated to appoint a successor owner trustee. Any resignation or removal of an owner trustee and appointment of a successor owner trustee will not become effective until acceptance of the appointment by the successor owner trustee. Costs associated with the termination of the owner trustee and the appointment of a successor will be borne by the servicer. In the event that the owner trustee is not entitled to be indemnified from the cash flow that would otherwise be used to pay the securities, if an Event of Default occurs and the servicer fails to satisfy its indemnification obligations under the trust agreement, the owner trustee may be entitled to be indemnified from the trust estate.

Unless the depositor is the sole certificateholder, on each distribution date, the owner trustee or other paying agent under the trust agreement will be required to distribute to the certificateholders amounts equal to the mounts deposited in the Certificate Distribution Account pursuant to the servicing agreement on or prior to such distribution date. The owner trustee or other paying agent will also be required to send each certificateholder the statement provided to the owner trustee by the servicer pursuant to the servicing agreement on such distribution date; provided that no such distributions will be required to be made and no such statements will be required to be sent by the owner trustee if and for so long as the depositor is the sole certificateholder. The owner trustee or any other paying agent will retain from amounts otherwise distributable to the certificateholders sufficient funds for the payment of any tax that is legally owed by the trust. The owner trustee will maintain or cause to be maintained the books of the trust on a calendar year basis on the accrual method of accounting, deliver to each certificateholder the information required to enable each certificateholder to prepare its federal income tax return, prepare and file tax returns relating to the trust and make such elections as may from time to time be required or appropriate under any applicable state or federal statute, rule or regulation so as to maintain the appropriate trust characterization for federal income tax purposes.

The owner trustee does not have any obligation to independently verify or confirm any underlying data.

ASSET REPRESENTATIONS REVIEWER

Clayton Fixed Income Services LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (the “asset representations reviewer”), is the asset representations reviewer appointed under the asset representations review agreement. The asset representations reviewer is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Radian Group, Inc., and has provided independent due diligence loan review and servicer oversight services since 1989.

The asset representations reviewer is a provider of targeted due diligence reviews of securitized assets and policies and procedures of originators and servicers to assess compliance with representations and warranties, regulatory and legal requirements, investor guidelines and settlement agreements. The asset representations reviewer has performed over 12 million loan reviews and provided ongoing services to over $2 trillion of securitization transactions on behalf of investors, sponsors, issuers and originators, including government sponsored enterprises and other governmental agencies. These services have been performed primarily on residential mortgage loan and residential mortgage-backed security transactions, although the asset representations reviewer has also performed these services for transactions involving auto loans, credit cards, commercial mortgage loans, student loans, timeshare loans and boat and recreational vehicle loans. The asset representations reviewer has been engaged on more than 150 auto and equipment loan, lease and dealer floorplan and credit card securitization transactions since 2015.

97

The asset representations reviewer is not, and will not be during the term of the transaction, affiliated with the sponsor, the servicer, the depositor, the trust, the indenture trustee, the owner trustee or any of their affiliates. Additionally, the asset representations reviewer is not affiliated with the third party that performed pre-closing due diligence services for the transaction. The asset representations reviewer may be appointed as an asset representations reviewer on other transactions for the sponsor or its affiliates.

The asset representations reviewer will be paid an annual fee of $5,000 by the sponsor. To the extent any fees, expenses and indemnification of the asset representations reviewer are not paid by the sponsor, any unpaid fees, expenses and indemnification of the asset representations reviewer will be paid from the trust estate. Any receivables review performed by the asset representations reviewer after a delinquency trigger is met or exceeded and the noteholders vote to perform the review will be paid by the trust.

The asset representations reviewer’s liability in connection with the asset representations review is limited solely to the express obligations of the asset representations reviewer set forth in the asset representations review agreement.

The asset representations reviewer will not be liable for the default or failure of any of the administrator, the trust, the servicer, the owner trustee or the indenture trustee to carry out their respective obligations under any of the transaction documents, nor will the asset representations reviewer be liable under any transaction document under any circumstances, except for its own willful misconduct, bad faith or negligence. To the extent not paid by the sponsor, the trust will indemnify the asset representations reviewer for all losses resulting from the asset representations reviewer’s performance under the asset representations review agreement, except for any losses arising from the asset representations reviewer’s own willful misconduct, bad faith or negligence, or breach of any representations or warranties made in the asset representations review agreement.

The asset representations reviewer may not resign unless it ceases to be an eligible asset representations reviewer, becomes legally unable to act or if the trust consents to its resignation, and it will give the sponsor and the trust 60 days prior notice of its resignation. The administrator may also remove the asset representations reviewer if the asset representations reviewer becomes legally unable to act, ceases to be eligible to continue as an asset representations reviewer, becomes subject to a bankruptcy or breaches any of its representations, warranties, agreements or covenants contained in the asset representations review agreement. In those circumstances, the administrator will be obligated to appoint a successor asset representations reviewer. Any resignation or removal of an asset representations reviewer and appointment of a successor asset representations reviewer will not become effective until acceptance of the appointment by the successor asset representations reviewer. Costs associated with the termination of the asset representations reviewer and the appointment of a successor will be borne by the sponsor. In the event that the asset representations reviewer is not entitled to be indemnified from the cash flow that would otherwise be used to pay the securities, if an Event of Default occurs and the sponsor fails to satisfy its indemnification obligations under the asset representations review agreement as described in the preceding paragraph, the asset representations reviewer may be entitled to be indemnified from the trust estate.

LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

There are no current legal proceedings pending, or to the best knowledge of management of such entity, threatened, against the trust, the sponsor, the servicer or the depositor that, if determined adversely to such party, would be expected to have a material adverse effect on the performance of the offered notes.

Each of the owner trustee and the indenture trustee has represented to the trust that it is not a party to any current legal proceedings that are not already described in this prospectus, nor is its management aware of any legal proceedings threatened against it that, if determined adversely to such party, would be expected to be material to investors.

AFFILIATIONS AND RELATIONSHIPS AMONG TRANSACTION PARTIES

The owner trustee is not an affiliate of any of the depositor, the sponsor, the servicer, the issuing entity or the indenture trustee. The owner trustee and one or more of its affiliates, however, may, from time to time, engage in

98

arm’s-length transactions with the depositor, the sponsor, the servicer, the indenture trustee or affiliates of any of them, that are distinct from its role as owner trustee, including transactions both related and unrelated to the securitization of retail motor vehicle instalment sale contracts. The owner trustee and its affiliates, during the past two years, have not engaged in any transactions that are material to this transaction with any of the depositor, the sponsor, the servicer, the issuing entity or the indenture trustee that are outside of the ordinary course of business or that are other than at arm’s length.

The indenture trustee is not an affiliate of any of the depositor, the sponsor, the servicer, the issuing entity or the owner trustee. The indenture trustee and one or more of its affiliates, however, may, from time to time, engage in arm’s-length transactions with the depositor, the sponsor, the servicer, the owner trustee or affiliates of any of them, that are distinct from its role as indenture trustee, including transactions both related and unrelated to the securitization of retail vehicle instalment sale contracts. The indenture trustee and its affiliates, during the past two years, have not engaged in any transactions that are material to this transaction with any of the depositor, the sponsor, the servicer, the issuing entity or the owner trustee that are outside of the ordinary course of business or that are other than at arm’s length.

Deutsche Bank Securities Inc., an underwriter for the offered notes, and the indenture trustee are affiliates and engage in other similar transactions with each other involving securitizations.

The asset representations reviewer is not an affiliate of any of the depositor, the sponsor, the servicer, the issuing entity, the owner trustee or the indenture trustee. The depositor, the servicer and the sponsor, however, may, from time to time, engage in arm’s-length transactions with the asset representations reviewer or its affiliates, including transactions both related and unrelated to the securitization of retail vehicle instalment sale contracts.

The sponsor, the servicer and the depositor are affiliates and also engage in transactions with each other involving securitizations, including public offerings and private placements of asset-backed securities as well as commercial paper conduit financing, of retail vehicle instalment sale contracts, including those described in this prospectus and others. Specifically, the depositor and Ally Bank have entered into an intercompany advance agreement through which the depositor may borrow funds from Ally Bank to fund its general operating expenses and, for some securitization transactions in which the depositor acts as the depositor, to pay for a portion of the receivables pursuant to the pooling agreement and transaction expenses. Under the intercompany advance agreement, the loans will bear a market rate of interest and have documented repayment terms.

On the closing date, the issuing entity is issuing certificates, not offered hereby. The depositor may sell in one or more private placement transactions or initially retain the certificates, which represents the principal equity in the issuing entity. If the depositor retains the certificates, the issuing entity will be a direct subsidiary of the depositor and an indirect subsidiary of the sponsor. The depositor retains the right to sell all or a portion of the retained certificates at any time. Following any such sale to an unaffiliated third party, the issuing entity may cease to be an affiliate of either the sponsor or the depositor. The issuing entity has not engaged, and will not engage, in any material transactions with the sponsor or the depositor that are outside of the ordinary course of business or that are other than at arm’s length.

CONSIDERATIONS FOR ERISA AND OTHER U.S. EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS

General

Section 406 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended (“ERISA”) and Section 4975 of the Internal Revenue Code prohibit pension, profit-sharing or other employee benefit plans that are subject to Title I of ERISA, as well as individual retirement accounts and specified types of Keogh Plans that are subject to Section 4975 of the Internal Revenue Code and entities deemed to hold plan assets of any of the foregoing—we refer to each of these as a “benefit plan”—from engaging in specified transactions with persons that are “parties in interest” under ERISA or “disqualified persons” under the Internal Revenue Code with respect to that benefit plan. A violation of these “prohibited transaction” rules may result in an excise tax or other penalties and liabilities under ERISA and the Internal Revenue Code for these persons or fiduciaries of such benefit plan. In addition, Title I of ERISA requires fiduciaries of a benefit plan subject to ERISA to make investments that are prudent, diversified and in accordance with the governing plan documents. Governmental plans (as defined in

99

Section 3(32) of ERISA) and specified church plans (as defined in Section 3(33) of ERISA) are not subject to the fiduciary and prohibited transaction provisions of ERISA or Section 4975 of the Internal Revenue Code. However, such plans may be subject to comparable federal, state or local law restrictions.

The acquisition or holding of the notes by or on behalf of a benefit plan could be considered to give rise to a prohibited transaction if the servicer, the depositor, the trust, the administrator, the owner trustee, the indenture trustee, the underwriters or any of their respective affiliates (collectively, the “Transaction Parties”) is or becomes a party in interest or a disqualified person with respect to that benefit plan. Exemptions from the prohibited transaction rules could apply to the purchase and holding of the notes by a benefit plan depending on the type and circumstances of the plan fiduciary making the decision to acquire the notes. These exemptions include: Prohibited Transaction Class Exemption (“PTCE”) 96-23, regarding transactions effected by “in-house asset managers”; PTCE 95-60, regarding investments by insurance company general accounts; PTCE 91-38, regarding investments by bank collective investment funds; PTCE 90-1, regarding investments by insurance company pooled separate accounts; and PTCE 84-14, regarding transactions effected by “qualified professional asset managers.”

In addition to the class exemptions listed above, the Pension Protection Act of 2006 provides a statutory exemption under Section 408(b)(17) of ERISA and Section 4975(d)(20) of the Internal Revenue Code for prohibited transactions between a benefit plan and a person or entity that is a party in interest to such benefit plan solely by reason of providing services to the benefit plan (other than a party in interest that is a fiduciary, or its affiliate, that has or exercises discretionary authority or control or renders investment advice with respect to the assets of the benefit plan involved in the transaction), provided that there is adequate consideration for the transaction. Even if the conditions specified in one or more of these exemptions are met, the scope of the relief provided by these exemptions might or might not cover all acts which might be construed as prohibited transactions. There can be no assurance that any of these, or any other exemption, will be available with respect to any particular transaction involving the notes, and prospective purchasers that are benefit plans should consult with their advisors regarding the applicability of any such exemption.

As described in this prospectus, certain of the Transaction Parties may receive fees or other compensation as a result of a benefit plan’s acquisition of the offered notes. Accordingly, none of the Transaction Parties are undertaking to provide impartial investment advice, or to give advice in a fiduciary capacity, in connection with the acquisition of any of the offered notes by any benefit plan. In addition, the decision to purchase and hold the offered notes must be made by each prospective benefit plan investor on an arm’s length basis. Each benefit plan acquiring the offered notes must generally be represented by a fiduciary (a “Plan Fiduciary”) independent of the Transaction Parties (which may not be an individual directing his or her own individual retirement account or plan account or relative of such individual) that (i) is capable of evaluating investment risks independently, both in general and with regard to the prospective investment in the offered notes and (ii) has exercised independent judgment in evaluating whether to invest the assets of such benefit plan in the offered notes.

By acquiring an offered note (or interest therein), each purchaser and transferee (and if the purchaser or transferee is a benefit plan or other plan, its fiduciary) will be deemed to represent and warrant that either (a) it is not acquiring the offered notes with the assets of a benefit plan or other plan that is subject to any law that is substantially similar to Title I of ERISA or Section 4975 of the Internal Revenue Code (“Similar Law”) or (b) the acquisition and holding of the offered notes will not give rise to a nonexempt prohibited transaction under Section 406 of ERISA or Section 4975 of the Internal Revenue Code or a violation of Similar Law. Benefit plans and plans subject to Similar Law may not acquire the offered notes at any time that the ratings on the offered notes are below investment grade or the offered notes have been characterized as other than indebtedness for applicable local law purposes.

In addition, each purchaser and transferee of the offered notes that is a benefit plan and its Plan Fiduciary is deemed to represent and warrant in connection with the acquisition of the offered notes that:

1. the decision to acquire the offered notes (or interest therein) has been made on an arm’s length basis by the Plan Fiduciary;

2. the Plan Fiduciary is independent of the Transaction Parties, and the Plan Fiduciary either:

100

(a) is a bank as defined in Section 202 of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, as amended (the “Advisers Act”), or similar institution that is regulated and supervised and subject to periodic examination by a U.S. state or U.S. federal agency;

(b) is an insurance carrier which is qualified under the laws of more than one U.S. state to perform the services of managing, acquiring or disposing of assets of an “employee benefit plan” described in Section 3(3) of ERISA or “plan” described in Section 4975(e)(1)(A) of the Internal Revenue Code;

(c) is an investment adviser registered under the Advisers Act, or, if not registered as an investment adviser under the Advisers Act by reason of paragraph (1) of Section 203A of the Advisers Act, is registered as an investment adviser under the laws of the U.S. state in which it maintains its principal office and place of business;

(d) is a broker-dealer registered under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; or

(e) holds, or has under its management or control, total assets of at least U.S. $50 million (provided that this clause (e) shall not be satisfied if the Plan Fiduciary is either (i) an individual directing his or her own individual retirement account or relative of such individual or (ii) a participant or beneficiary of such benefit plan purchasing the offered notes or a relative of such participant or beneficiary);

3. the Plan Fiduciary is capable of evaluating investment risks independently, both in general and with respect to particular transactions and investment strategies, including the acquisition by the benefit plan of the offered notes;

4. the Plan Fiduciary is a “fiduciary” with respect to the benefit plan within the meaning of Section 3(21) of ERISA, Section 4975 of the Internal Revenue Code, or both, and is responsible for exercising independent judgment in evaluating the benefit plan’s acquisition of the offered notes;

5. none of the Transaction Parties has exercised any authority to cause the benefit plan to invest in the offered notes or to negotiate the terms of the benefit plan’s investment in the offered notes; and

6. the Plan Fiduciary has been informed by the Transaction Parties:

(a) that none of the Transaction Parties are undertaking to provide impartial investment advice or to give advice in a fiduciary capacity in connection with the benefit plan’s acquisition of the offered notes; and

(b) of the existence and nature of the Transaction Parties’ financial interests in the benefit plan’s acquisition of the offered notes, as described in this prospectus.

Plan Assets Regulation

In addition, despite the application of one of the foregoing exemptions to the purchase and/or holding of a note, transactions involving the trust might be deemed to constitute prohibited transactions under ERISA and the Internal Revenue Code with respect to a benefit plan that purchased securities if assets of the trust were deemed to be assets of the benefit plan. Under a regulation issued by the U.S. Department of Labor, as modified by Section 3(42) of ERISA (the “plan assets regulation”), the assets of the trust would be treated as plan assets of a benefit plan for the purposes of ERISA and the Internal Revenue Code only if the benefit plan acquired an “equity interest” in the trust and none of the exceptions contained in the plan assets regulation applied. An equity interest is defined under the plan assets regulation as an interest other than an instrument that is treated as indebtedness under applicable local law and that has no substantial equity features.

101

Although there is little guidance on the subject, the depositor believes that, at the time of their issuance, the offered notes should not be treated as an equity interest in the trust for purposes of the plan assets regulation. This determination is based in part upon the traditional debt features of the offered notes, including the reasonable expectation of purchasers of the offered notes that the offered notes will be repaid when due, the traditional default remedies, as well as the absence of conversion rights, warrants and other typical equity features. The debt treatment of the offered notes for ERISA purposes could change if the trust incurred losses. The more subordinated a class of offered notes is, the greater the risk of recharacterization is with respect to that class. In the event of a withdrawal or downgrade to below investment grade of the rating of the offered notes or a characterization of the offered notes as other than indebtedness under applicable local law, the subsequent acquisition of the offered notes or interest therein by a benefit plan or plan subject to Similar Law is prohibited.

If you are a benefit plan fiduciary considering the purchase of the offered notes, you should consult with your counsel with respect to whether the assets of the trust will be deemed to be plan assets and the applicability of any exemption from the prohibited transaction rules and determine on your own whether all conditions have been satisfied and whether the offered notes are an appropriate investment for a benefit plan under ERISA and the Internal Revenue Code.

FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSEQUENCES

On the closing date, Mayer Brown LLP, special tax counsel to the depositor, will deliver its opinion for federal income tax purposes that the offered notes will be characterized as indebtedness to the extent the notes are treated as beneficially owned by a person other than the sponsor or its affiliates for such purposes. Each noteholder, by the acceptance of an offered note (other than notes that are retained by the depositor or one or more affiliates thereof), will agree to treat the offered note as indebtedness for federal, state and local income and franchise tax purposes.

The offered notes may be issued with original issue discount, or “OID,” for federal income tax purposes. The rules discussed under “—The Notes—Original Issue Discount” below requiring a holder to include OID in income under a “constant yield method” are inapplicable to OID which is de minimis. However, a holder of an offered note with a de minimis amount of OID must include such OID in income proportionately as principal payments are made on such offered note. See “—The Notes—Original Issue Discount” below for a general discussion of the federal income tax treatment of OID and its general application to holders of debt instruments.

Mayer Brown LLP will also deliver its opinion that the trust will be classified as a grantor trust under the Internal Revenue Code, and will not be taxable as an association or publicly traded partnership taxable as a corporation. See “Federal Income Tax Consequences” and “State and Local Tax Consequences” in this prospectus.

The following discussion of the material federal income tax consequences of the purchase, ownership and disposition of the offered notes, to the extent it relates to matters of law or legal conclusions with respect thereto, represents the opinion of Mayer Brown LLP with respect to the offered notes on the material matters associated with such consequences, subject to the qualifications set forth below. In addition, Mayer Brown LLP has prepared or reviewed the statements in this prospectus under the heading “Federal Income Tax Consequences—The Notes,” and is of the opinion that such statements are correct.

Qualifications on Opinion of Tax Counsel

This discussion is based upon current provisions of the Internal Revenue Code, existing and proposed Treasury regulations thereunder, current administrative rulings, judicial decisions and other applicable authorities. There are no cases or Internal Revenue Service rulings on similar transactions involving both debt and equity interests issued by a trust with terms similar to those of the offered notes. As a result, there can be no assurance that the IRS will not challenge the conclusions reached in this prospectus, and no ruling from the IRS has been or will be sought on any of the issues discussed below. Furthermore, legislative, judicial or administrative changes may occur, perhaps with retroactive effect, which could affect the accuracy of the statements and conclusions set forth in this prospectus as well as the tax consequences to noteholders.

102

The following discussion does not purport to deal with all aspects of federal income taxation that may be relevant to the noteholders in light of their personal investment circumstances nor, except for limited discussions of particular topics, to holders subject to special treatment under the federal income tax laws, e.g., financial institutions, broker-dealers, life insurance companies, regulated investment companies, tax-exempt organizations, holders whose functional currency is not the United States dollar and holders that hold the notes as part of a conversion transaction, hedge or hedging transaction, straddle, synthetic security or other integrated transaction for federal income tax purposes. This information is directed to prospective purchasers who purchase notes in the initial distribution thereof, who are citizens or residents of the United States, including domestic corporations and partnerships, and who hold the notes as “capital assets” within the meaning of Section 1221 of the Internal Revenue Code. The depositor suggests that prospective investors consult with their tax advisors as to the federal, state, local, foreign and any other tax considerations to them of the purchase, ownership and disposition of the notes. The following discussion does not purport to furnish information in the level of detail or with the attention to a prospective investor’s specific tax circumstances that would be provided by a prospective investor’s own tax advisor.

The Notes

Characterization as Indebtedness. Prior to the sale of the offered notes, Mayer Brown LLP will deliver its opinion to the effect that the offered notes will be characterized as indebtedness for federal income tax purposes to the extent the notes are treated as beneficially owned by a person other than the sponsor or its affiliates for such purposes. Such opinion will be subject to the qualifications and assumptions as set forth therein. The depositor, the servicer and each noteholder, by acquiring an interest in an offered note, will agree to treat the offered notes as indebtedness for federal, state and local income and franchise tax purposes.

Treatment of Stated Interest. Assuming the offered notes are treated as indebtedness for federal income tax purposes and are not issued with OID, the stated interest on a note will be taxable to a noteholder as ordinary income when received or accrued in accordance with the noteholder’s method of tax accounting. Interest received on a note may constitute “investment income” for purposes of some limitations of the Internal Revenue Code concerning the deductibility of investment interest expense.

Original Issue Discount. In general, OID is the excess of the “stated redemption price at maturity” of a debt instrument over its “issue price,” unless that excess falls within a statutorily defined de minimis exception. A note’s “stated redemption price at maturity” is the aggregate of all payments required to be made under the note through maturity except “qualified stated interest.” Qualified stated interest is generally interest that is unconditionally payable in cash or property, other than debt instruments of the trust, at fixed intervals of one year or less during the entire term of the instrument at specified rates. The “issue price” will be the first price at which a substantial amount of the offered notes are sold, excluding sales to bond holders, brokers or similar persons acting as underwriters, initial purchasers, placement agents or wholesalers.

The issuing entity intends to take the position that the notes are not issued with OID. However, if a note were treated as being issued with OID, a noteholder would be required to include OID in income as interest over the term of the note under a constant yield method. In general, OID must be included in income in advance of the receipt of cash representing that income. Thus, each cash distribution would be treated as an amount already included in income, to the extent OID has accrued as of the date of the interest distribution and is not allocated to prior distributions, or as a repayment of principal. This treatment would have no significant effect on noteholders using the accrual method of accounting. However, cash method noteholders may be required to report income on the offered notes in advance of the receipt of cash attributable to that income. Even if a note has OID falling within the de minimis exception, the noteholder must include that OID in income proportionately as principal payments are made on that note.

A holder who purchases a note after the initial distribution thereof at a discount that exceeds a statutorily defined de minimis amount will be subject to the “market discount” rules of the Internal Revenue Code, and a holder who purchases a note at a premium will be subject to the bond premium amortization rules of the Internal Revenue Code.

Market Discount. The offered notes, whether or not issued with OID, will be subject to the “market discount rules” of Section 1276 of the Internal Revenue Code. In general, these rules provide that if a noteholder

103

acquires a note at a market discount (that is, a discount from its stated redemption price at maturity or, if the offered notes were issued with OID, its original issue price plus any accrued OID that exceeds a de minimis amount) and thereafter recognizes gain upon a disposition or receives payments of principal, then such gain or principal payment, to the extent of the accrued market discount, will be taxed as ordinary interest income to the noteholder.

Generally, the accrued market discount will be the total market discount on the note multiplied by a fraction, the numerator of which is the number of days the noteholder held the note and the denominator of which is the number of days from the date the noteholder acquired the note until its maturity date. The noteholder may elect, however, to determine accrued market discount under the constant yield method.

A noteholder that incurs or continues indebtedness to acquire a note at a market discount may also be required to defer the deduction of all or a portion of the interest on the indebtedness until the corresponding amount of market discount is included in income. A noteholder may elect to include market discount in gross income as it accrues and, if the noteholder properly makes such an election, is generally exempt from this rule. Any such election will apply to all debt instruments acquired by the taxpayer on or after the first day of the first taxable year to which such election applies. The adjusted basis of a note subject to such election will be increased to reflect market discount included in gross income, thereby reducing any gain or increasing any loss on a sale or other taxable disposition of the note.

Amortizable Bond Premium. In general, if a noteholder purchases a note at a premium (that is, an amount in excess of the amount payable upon the maturity thereof), such noteholder will be considered to have purchased such note with “amortizable bond premium” equal to the amount of such excess. The noteholder may elect to amortize such bond premium as an offset to interest income and not as a separate deduction item as it accrues under a constant yield method over the remaining term of the note. Such noteholder’s tax basis in the note will be reduced by the amount of the amortized bond premium. Any such election, properly made, will apply to all debt instruments (other than instruments the interest on which is excludible from gross income) held by the noteholder at the beginning of the first taxable year for which the election applies or thereafter acquired and is irrevocable without the consent of the IRS. Bond premium on a note held by a noteholder who does not elect to amortize the premium will remain a part of such noteholder’s tax basis in such note and will decrease the gain or increase the loss otherwise recognized on a sale or other taxable disposition of the note.

Acceleration of Income for Certain Noteholders. Accrual method noteholders that prepare an “applicable financial statement” (as defined in Section 451 of the Internal Revenue Code, which includes any GAAP financial statement, Form 10-K annual statement, audited financial statement or a financial statement filed with any Federal agency for non-tax purposes) generally would be required to include certain items of income, including OID and market discount, into gross income no later than the time such amounts are reflected on such a financial statement. (The application of this rule to income of a debt instrument with OID is effective for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2018.) This could result in an acceleration of income recognition for income items differing from the above description. United States holders should consult their own tax advisors regarding the possible implications of this legislation to interest, OID, market discount and premium matters concerning their notes.

Net Investment Income. A tax of 3.8% is imposed on the “net investment income” of certain individuals, trusts and estates. Among other items, net investment income generally includes gross income from interest and net gain attributable to the disposition of certain property, less certain deductions. United States holders should consult their own tax advisors regarding the possible implications of this legislation in their particular circumstances.

Disposition of Notes. If a noteholder sells a note, the holder will recognize gain or loss in an amount equal to the difference between the amount realized on the sale and the holder’s adjusted tax basis in the note. The adjusted tax basis of the note to a particular noteholder will equal the holder’s cost for the note, increased by any OID and market discount previously included by the noteholder in income from the note and decreased by any bond premium previously amortized and any principal payments previously received by the noteholder on the note. Any gain or loss will be capital gain or loss if the note was held as a capital asset, except for gain representing accrued interest or accrued market discount not previously included in income. Capital gain or loss will be long-term if the note was held by the holder for more than one year and otherwise will generally be short-term. Any capital losses realized generally may be used by a corporate taxpayer only to offset capital gains, and by an individual taxpayer only to the extent of capital gains plus $3,000 of other income.

104

Information Reporting and Backup Withholding. The trust will be required to report annually to the IRS, and to each noteholder of record, the amount of interest paid on the offered notes, and the amount of interest withheld for federal income taxes, if any, for each calendar year, except as to exempt holders which are generally corporations, tax-exempt organizations, qualified pension and profit-sharing trusts, individual retirement accounts or nonresident aliens who provide certification as to their status. Each holder will be required to provide to the trust, under penalties of perjury, a certificate containing the holder’s name, address, correct federal taxpayer identification number and a statement that the holder is not subject to backup withholding. If a nonexempt noteholder fails to provide the required certification, the trust will be required to withhold, from interest otherwise payable to the holder, the percentage of that interest specified in the Internal Revenue Code and remit the withheld amount to the IRS as a credit against the holder’s federal income tax liability.

Because the depositor will treat the trust as a grantor trust and all offered notes as indebtedness for federal income tax purposes, the depositor will not comply with the tax reporting requirements that would apply under any alternative tax characterizations.

Tax Consequences to Foreign Noteholders. Subject to the discussion under “—Foreign Account Tax Compliance” below, interest paid or accrued to a noteholder who is a Foreign Person that is not effectively connected with the conduct of a trade or business within the United States by the Foreign Person, generally will be considered “portfolio interest,” and generally will not be subject to United States federal income tax and withholding tax, as long as the Foreign Person satisfies certain requirements of the Internal Revenue Code, including the requirements that the Foreign Person:

(1) is not (A) actually or constructively a “10 percent shareholder” of the trust or the depositor (including via the certificates), or a holder of the certificates, (B) a “controlled foreign corporation” with respect to which the trust or the depositor is a “related person” within the meaning of the Internal Revenue Code, or (C) a bank within the meaning of Section 881(c)(3)(A) of the Internal Revenue Code, and

(2) provides an appropriate statement, signed under penalties of perjury, certifying that the beneficial owner of the note is a Foreign Person and providing that Foreign Person’s name and address. If the information provided in this statement changes, the Foreign Person must so inform the trust within 30 days of the change.

If the interest were not portfolio interest or if applicable certification requirements were not satisfied, then the interest would be subject to United States federal income and withholding tax at a rate of 30% unless reduced or eliminated pursuant to an applicable tax treaty.

Any capital gain realized on the sale, redemption, retirement or other taxable disposition of a note by a Foreign Person will be exempt from United States federal income and withholding tax, provided that

(1) the gain is not effectively connected with the conduct of a trade or business in the United States by the Foreign Person and

(2) in the case of a foreign individual, the Foreign Person is not present in the United States for 183 days or more in the taxable year.

If the interest, gain or income on a note held by a Foreign Person is effectively connected with the conduct of a trade or business in the United States by the Foreign Person, the holder, although exempt from the withholding tax previously discussed if an appropriate statement is furnished, generally will be subject to United States Federal income tax on the interest, gain or income at regular federal income tax rates. In addition, if the Foreign Person is a foreign corporation, it may be subject to a branch profits tax equal to 30% of the Foreign Person’s “effectively connected earnings and profits” within the meaning of the Internal Revenue Code for the taxable year, as adjusted for specified items, unless the Foreign Person qualifies for a lower rate under an applicable tax treaty.

Foreign Account Tax Compliance. Sections 1471 through 1474 of the Internal Revenue Code (commonly referred to as the “Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act” or “FATCA”) significantly changes the reporting

105

requirements imposed on certain Foreign Persons, including certain foreign financial institutions and investment funds. In general, a 30% withholding tax could be imposed on payments made to any such Foreign Persons unless such Foreign Person complies with certain reporting requirements regarding its direct and indirect U.S. shareholders or U.S. accountholders. Such withholding could apply to payments regardless of whether they are made to such Foreign Person in its capacity as a holder of a note or in a capacity of holding a note for the account of another. The withholding tax currently applies to interest payments but the withholding tax on gross proceeds from a disposition of debt instruments will not be imposed with respect to payments made prior to January 1, 2019. As a result, potential investors are encouraged to consult with their tax advisors regarding the possible implications of this legislation on an investment in the offered notes.

Each holder of a note or an interest therein, by acceptance of such note or such interest therein, will be deemed to have agreed to provide to the issuing entity, any paying agent or the indenture trustee, as applicable, (1) properly completed and signed tax certifications, for a U.S. person, on IRS Form W-9 and, for a Foreign Person, on the appropriate IRS Form W-8 and (2) to the extent any FATCA withholding or deduction is applicable, information sufficient to eliminate the imposition of, or determine the amount of, such withholding or deduction under FATCA. The indenture trustee or any paying agent of the issuing entity has the right to withhold any amounts (properly withholdable under law and without any corresponding gross-up) payable to any holder of a note or an interest therein that fails to comply with the requirements of the preceding sentence.

Notes Held by Affiliates. The IRS recently issued Treasury regulations under Section 385 of the Internal Revenue Code that address the treatment of instruments as debt or equity where the instruments are held by certain parties who are related to the issuer. Under these regulations, in certain circumstances a note that otherwise would be treated as debt is treated as equity for United States federal income tax purposes during periods in which the note is held by a related party (generally based on a group of corporations or controlled partnerships connected through 80% direct or indirect ownership). Under these regulations, although it is not entirely clear, it is expected that any notes treated as equity under these rules would be converted back to debt when acquired by a beneficial owner that is not a related party. The trust agreement addresses the Treasury regulations under Section  385 of the Internal Revenue Code in order to prevent their application to the notes.

Tax Shelter Disclosure and Investor List Requirements

Treasury Regulations directed at abusive tax shelter activity appear to apply to transactions not conventionally regarded as tax shelters. Such Treasury Regulations require taxpayers to report certain information on IRS Form 8886 if they participate in a “reportable transaction” and to retain certain information related to such transactions. Organizers and promoters of the transaction are required to maintain records including investor lists containing identifying information and to furnish those records to the IRS upon demand.

A transaction may be a “reportable transaction” based upon any of several indicia, one or more of which may be present with respect to your investment. The Internal Revenue Code imposes significant penalties for failure to comply with these disclosure requirements. Prospective investors should be aware that the transferor and other participants in the transaction intend to comply with such disclosure and investor list requirements. Prospective investors should consult their own tax advisors concerning any possible disclosure obligation with respect to their investment.

STATE AND LOCAL TAX CONSEQUENCES

The above discussion does not address the tax treatment of the trust, the offered notes or the noteholders under any state or local tax laws. The activities to be undertaken by the servicer in servicing and collecting the receivables will take place throughout the United States and, therefore, many different tax regimes potentially apply to different portions of these transactions. Additionally, it is possible a state may assert its right to impose tax on the issuing entity with respect to its income related to receivables collected from obligors located in such state, and/or require that a holder treated as an equity owner (including non-resident holders) file state income tax returns with the state pertaining to receivables collected from obligors located in such state (and may require withholding on related income). Prospective investors are urged to consult with their tax advisors regarding the state and local tax consequences for them of purchasing, holding and disposing of the offered notes.

106

PLAN OF DISTRIBUTION

The depositor, the sponsor and the underwriters named below will enter into an underwriting agreement for the notes offered by this prospectus. Subject to the terms and conditions set forth in the underwriting agreement, the depositor will agree to sell to each of the underwriters named below, and each of the underwriters will severally agree to purchase from the depositor, the principal amount of the offered notes set forth opposite its name below:

107

Aggregate Principal Amount to be Purchased

Underwriters	Class A-1 Notes		Class A-2 Notes		Class A-3 Notes		Class A-4 Notes		Class B Notes
Barclays Capital Inc.	$	80,657,000	$	96,902,000	$	96,902,000	$	26,810,000	$	7,448,000
Deutsche Bank Securities Inc.	$	80,655,000	$	96,900,000	$	96,900,000	$	26,808,000	$	7,446,000
J.P. Morgan Securities LLC.	$	80,655,000	$	96,900,000	$	96,900,000	$	26,808,000	$	7,446,000
Lloyds Securities Inc	$	8,961,000	$	10,766,000	$	10,766,000	$	2,978,000		—
Scotia Capital (USA) Inc.	$	8,961,000	$	10,766,000	$	10,766,000	$	2,978,000		—
Wells Fargo Securities, LLC.	$	8,961,000	$	10,766,000	$	10,766,000	$	2,978,000		—
Total	$	268,850,000	$	323,000,000	$	323,000,000	$	89,360,000	$	22,340,000

None of the sponsor, the depositor, the servicer, the issuing entity or the underwriters make any representation or agreement that it is undertaking or will have undertaken to comply, or to take or refrain from taking any action to enable affected investors to comply, with the requirements of Articles 404-410 of Regulation (EU) No. 575/2013 of the European Parliament of the Council of June 26, 2013, known as the Capital Requirements Regulation (“CRR”), as supplemented by Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) No. 625/2014 and Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No. 602/2014, Article 17 of the European Union Alternative Investment Fund Managers Directive (Directive 2011/61/EU) as supplemented by Section 5 of Chapter III of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) No. 231/2013 (“AIFMD”) or Article 135(2) of the European Union Solvency II Directive (Directive 2009/138/EC, as amended) as supplemented by Chapter VIII of Title I (Articles 254-257) of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) No. 2015/35 (“Solvency II”), or, to the extent, if any, that they may become applicable to the notes offered by or the transactions described in this prospectus, the requirements of Chapter 2 of Regulation (EU) No. 2017/2402 of December 12, 2017 (the “Securitization Regulation”). Noteholders are responsible for analyzing their own regulatory position and are advised to consult with their own advisors regarding the suitability of the offered notes for investment compliance with the CRR, the AIFMD or Solvency II or the Securitization Regulation.

The underwriters are responsible for jointly leading and managing the offering of the offered notes.

The depositor has been advised by the underwriters that the several underwriters propose initially to offer the Class A-1 Notes, the Class A-2 Notes, the Class A-3 Notes, the Class A-4 Notes and the Class B Notes (with the exception of those notes to be retained by the depositor or a majority-owned affiliate of the sponsor as part of the EVI or otherwise) to the public at the prices set forth on the cover page of this prospectus, and to dealers at those prices less a selling concession not in excess of the percentage set forth below for each class of offered notes. The underwriters may allow, and those dealers may reallow to other dealers, a subsequent concession not in excess of the percentage set forth below for each class of offered notes. After the initial public offering, the public offering price and these concessions may be changed.

	Selling Concession(1)			Reallowance
Class A-1 Notes		0.030	%		0.015	%
Class A-2 Notes		0.120	%		0.060	%
Class A-3 Notes		0.150	%		0.075	%
Class A-4 Notes		0.180	%		0.090	%
Class B Notes		0.240	%		0.120	%

(1) Due to sales to affiliates, one or more of the underwriters may be required to forego a de minimis portion of the selling concession they would otherwise be entitled to receive.

The underwriters may engage in over-allotment transactions, stabilizing transactions, syndicate covering transactions and penalty bids for the offered notes in accordance with Regulation M under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

Over-allotment transactions involve short sales by the underwriters of the offered notes. Short sales involve the sale by the underwriters of a greater number of offered notes than they are required to purchase in the offering. This creates a syndicate short position and the need to engage in syndicate covering transactions to close out the syndicate short position. Short sales may be in the form of “covered” short sales or “naked” short sales.

108

Covered short sales are sales made in an amount not greater than the underwriters’ over-allotment option to purchase additional offered notes in the offering. The underwriters may close out any covered short position by either exercising their over-allotment option or purchasing the offered notes in the open market. In determining the source of the offered notes to close out the covered short position, the underwriters will consider, among other things, the price of the offered notes available for purchase in the open market as compared to the price at which they may purchase the offered notes through the over-allotment option.

Naked short sales are sales in excess of the over-allotment option. The underwriters must close out any naked short position by purchasing the offered notes in the open market. A naked short position is more likely to be created if the underwriters are concerned that there may be downward pressure on the price of the offered notes in the open market after pricing that could adversely affect investors who purchase notes in the offering.

Stabilizing transactions permit the underwriters to make bids on or purchase the offered notes so long as the stabilizing bids or purchase prices do not exceed a stated maximum.

Syndicate covering transactions involve purchases of the offered notes in the open market after the distribution has been completed in order to cover syndicate short positions.

Penalty bids permit the underwriters to reclaim a selling concession from a syndicate member when the offered notes originally sold by that syndicate member are purchased in a syndicate covering transaction.

Similar to other purchase transactions, over-allotment transactions, stabilizing transactions, syndicate covering transactions and penalty bids may cause the prices of the offered notes to be higher than they would otherwise be in the absence of these transactions, and may also have the potential effect of preventing or retarding a decline in the market value of the offered notes. Neither the depositor nor any underwriter represents that the underwriters will engage in any of these transactions or that these transactions, once commenced, will not be discontinued without notice at any time.

The depositor and Ally Bank will indemnify the underwriters against specified liabilities, including liabilities under the Securities Act.

The indenture trustee may, from time to time, invest the issuing entity’s funds in the bank accounts in Eligible Investments offered by the underwriters or affiliates of the underwriters.

In the ordinary course of its business, one or more of the underwriters and affiliates have provided, and in the future may provide, investment banking and commercial banking services to the depositor, the issuing entity and their affiliates.

The following chart sets forth information on the aggregate proceeds to the depositor from the sale of the offered notes.

	Aggregate Amount		As a Percent of Initial Aggregate Principal Amount of the Offered Notes
Sale of the Offered Notes Proceeds	$	1,026,473,645.18		99.99256	%
Underwriting Discount on the Offered Notes	$	1,945,365.00		0.18951	%
Additional Offering Expenses	$	1,000,000.00		0.09741	%
Net Proceeds to Depositor	$	1,023,528,280.18		99.70564	%

Matters Relating to the Offering of the Notes in Europe

Each underwriter has represented and agreed that it has not offered, sold or otherwise made available and will not offer, sell or otherwise make available any offered notes to any retail investor in the European Economic Area. For the purposes of this provision:

109

(a) the expression “retail investor” means a person who is one (or more) of the following: (i) a retail client as defined in point (11) of Article 4(1) of Directive 2014/65/EU (as amended, “MiFID II”); (ii) a customer within the meaning of Directive 2002/92/EC (as amended), where that customer would not qualify as a professional client as defined in point (10) of Article 4(1) of MiFID II or (iii) not a qualified investor as defined in Directive 2003/71/EC (as amended);

(b) the expression “offer” includes the communication in any form and by any means of sufficient information on the terms of the offer and the offered notes to be offered so as to enable an investor to decide to purchase or subscribe the offered notes; and

(c) the countries comprising the “European Economic Area” are Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Croatia, Cyprus, the Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Liechtenstein, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Slovak Republic, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden and the United Kingdom.

United Kingdom. Each underwriter has represented, warranted and agreed that:

(a) it has only communicated or caused to be communicated and will only communicate or cause to be communicated any invitation or inducement to engage in investment activity (within the meaning of Section 21 of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (the “FSMA”)) received by it in connection with the issue or sale of any notes in circumstances in which section 21(1) of the FSMA does not apply to the issuing entity or the depositor; and

(b) it has complied and will comply with all applicable provisions of the FSMA with respect to anything done by it in relation to any notes in, from or otherwise involving the United Kingdom.

LEGAL OPINIONS

Specified matters relating to the offered notes will be passed upon for the trust, the depositor, the servicer and Ally Bank by Richard V. Kent, Esq., General Counsel to the depositor, by Jonathan P. Andrews, Chief Counsel to Ally Bank, by Mayer Brown LLP, counsel to the depositor, the trust and Ally Bank, and by Prince, Yeates & Geldzahler, Utah counsel for Ally Bank. Certain federal income tax matters and certain bank insolvency matters will be passed upon for Ally Bank, the trust and the depositor by Mayer Brown LLP. Mr. Kent and Mr. Andrews may each from time to time own common stock of Ally Financial. Specified matters relating to the offered notes will be passed upon for the underwriters by Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP, which has from time to time represented Ally Bank and its affiliates.

WHERE YOU CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION

We filed a registration statement relating to the notes with the SEC under the Securities Act. This prospectus is part of the registration statement, but the registration statement includes additional information.

The servicer will file with the SEC all required annual reports on Form 10-K, including registered public accounting firm attestation reports and servicer compliance statements, monthly distribution reports on Form 10-D, monthly asset level data files and related documents on Form ABS-EE, current reports on Form 8-K, and amendments to those reports about the trust under Ally Auto Receivables Trust 2018-1, SEC file number 333-204844-09. These reports will be made available on the world wide web at http://www.ally.com/about/investor/auto-securitization/us/.

You may read and copy any reports, statements or other information we file at the SEC’s public reference room in Washington, D.C. You can request copies of these documents, upon payment of a duplicating fee, by writing to the SEC. Please call the SEC at (800) SEC-0330 for further information on the operation of the public reference rooms. Our SEC filings are also available to the public on the SEC Internet site, http://www.sec.gov.

110

For a summary of reports to be provided to securityholders, see “Reports to Securityholders” in this prospectus.

INCORPORATION BY REFERENCE

The SEC allows us to “incorporate by reference” information we file with it, which means that we can disclose important information to you by referring you to those documents. The information incorporated by reference is considered to be part of this prospectus. We incorporate by reference any SEC reports and materials except for auditor’s reports or Forms ABS-15G filed or furnished by or on behalf of the issuing entity since the end of the latest fiscal year. We also incorporate by reference any future SEC reports and materials except for auditor’s reports or Forms ABS-15G filed or furnished by or on behalf of the issuing entity until we terminate our offering of the notes issued by the issuing entity. Information that we file later with the SEC will automatically update the information in this prospectus. In all cases, you should rely on the later information over different information included in this prospectus.

As a recipient of this prospectus, you may request a copy of any document we incorporate by reference, except exhibits to the documents not specifically incorporated by reference, at no cost, by writing us at: Ally Bank, 200 West Civic Center Drive, Sandy, Utah, 84070, or by calling us at: (801) 790-5000.

GLOSSARY OF TERMS TO THIS PROSPECTUS

The following are definitions of terms used in this prospectus. References to the singular form of defined terms in this prospectus include references to the plural and vice versa.

“AAA” means the American Arbitration Association.

“AAA Rules” means the AAA’s Commercial Arbitration Rules and Mediation Procedures, or any successor rules or procedures.

“Acquisition” has the meaning set forth under “The Servicer.”

“Administrative Purchase Payment” means, for any Administrative Receivable, a payment equal to the Receivables Principal Balance less that portion of all payments made on or prior to the last day of the prior monthly period allocable to principal plus one month of interest on the receivable, calculated at the greater of the Discount Rate and the APR.

“Administrative Receivable” means a receivable which the servicer is required to purchase as a result of a breach of a covenant which materially and adversely affects any receivable held by the trust pursuant to the servicing agreement or which the servicer has elected to repurchase pursuant to the servicing agreement.

“aggregate amount financed” means with respect to all the receivables as of the cutoff date, $ 1,119,773,433.38.

“Aggregate Class A Interest Distributable Amount” means, with respect to any distribution date, the sum of (1) the aggregate of the Note Class Interest Distributable Amount for each class of the Class A Notes as of such distribution date and (2) the Class A Interest Carryover Shortfall as of the preceding distribution date.

“Aggregate Class B Interest Distributable Amount” means, with respect to any distribution date, the sum of the Note Class Interest Distributable Amount as of such distribution date for the Class B Notes and the Class B Interest Carryover Shortfall as of the preceding distribution date.

“Aggregate Class C Interest Distributable Amount” means, with respect to any distribution date, the sum of the Note Class Interest Distributable Amount as of such distribution date for the Class C Notes and the Class C Interest Carryover Shortfall as of the preceding distribution date.

111

“Aggregate Class D Interest Distributable Amount” means, with respect to any distribution date, the sum of the Note Class Interest Distributable Amount as of such distribution date for the Class D Notes and the Class D Interest Carryover Shortfall as of the preceding distribution date.

“Aggregate Noteholders’ Interest Distributable Amount” means, for any distribution date, the sum of (1) the Aggregate Class A Interest Distributable Amount with respect to such distribution date, (2) the Aggregate Class B Interest Distributable Amount as of such distribution date, (3) the Aggregate Class C Interest Distributable Amount as of such distribution date, and (4) the Aggregate Class D Interest Distributable Amount as of such distribution date.

“Aggregate Noteholders’ Principal Distributable Amount” means, for any distribution date, the sum of (1) the Noteholders’ Regular Principal Distributable Amount as of such distribution date and (2) the Aggregate Noteholders’ Priority Principal Distributable Amount as of such distribution date.

“Aggregate Noteholders’ Priority Principal Distributable Amount” means, with respect to any distribution date, the sum of (1) the First Priority Principal Distributable Amount, (2) the Second Priority Principal Distributable Amount, (3) the Third Priority Principal Distributable Amount, and (4) the Fourth Priority Principal Distributable Amount, each as of such distribution date.

“Aggregate Principal Balance of Non-Subvented Receivables” means, as of any date, the present value as of that date of all scheduled monthly payments on all of the non-subvented receivables (other than Liquidating Receivables) held by the trust on that date which have not been applied on or prior to such date (determined after taking into account any Warranty Payments and Administrative Purchase Payments in respect of such receivables), with each receivable being discounted from the last day of the calendar month in which payments are to become due to that date at the greater of the Discount Rate and the annual percentage rate of the receivable.

“Aggregate Principal Balance of Subvented Receivables” means, as of any date, the present value as of that date of all scheduled monthly payments on all of the subvented receivables (other than Liquidating Receivables) held by the trust on that date which have not been applied on or prior to such date (determined after taking into account any Warranty Payments and Administrative Purchase Payments in respect of such receivables), with each receivable being discounted from the last day of the calendar month in which payments are to become due to that date at the greater of the Discount Rate and the annual percentage rate of the receivable.

“Aggregate Receivables Face Amount” means as of any date, the sum of the Principal Balances of all outstanding receivables, other than Liquidating Receivables, held by the trust on that date.

“aggregate receivables principal balance” has the meaning set forth in “Summary—The Receivables.”

“AIFMD” has the meaning set forth in “Plan of Distribution.”

“Ally Financial” means Ally Financial Inc., formerly known as GMAC Inc., GMAC LLC and General Motors Acceptance Corporation, and its successors and assigns.

“Ally Servicing” means Ally Servicing LLC, formerly known as Semperian LLC.

“amount financed” means, for a receivable, the aggregate amount advanced toward the purchase price of the financed vehicle, including accessories, insurance premiums, service and warranty contracts and other items customarily financed as part of retail automobile instalment sale contracts and direct purchase money loans and related costs, less:

(1) payments received from the obligor prior to the cutoff date allocable to principal, and

(2) any amount allocable to the premium for physical damage collateral protection insurance covering the financed vehicle required by the seller or the servicer.

112

“APR” means, for a receivable, the annual percentage rate.

“Available Interest” means, for a distribution date:

the sum, for the prior monthly period, of:

(1) that portion of all collections on the receivables held by the trust, other than Liquidating Receivables, allocable to interest,

(2) Liquidation Proceeds, to the extent allocable to interest, and

(3) the Warranty Payment or the Administrative Purchase Payment for each receivable that the depositor repurchased or the servicer purchased during that monthly period, to the extent allocable to accrued interest thereon,

except, that liquidation expenses as specified in the servicing agreement as an allowance for amounts charged to the account of the obligor, in keeping with the servicer’s customary procedures, for the refurbishing and disposition of the financed vehicle and other out-of-pocket costs incurred in the liquidation, will be excluded from “Available Interest.”

For purposes of this definition, references to the prior monthly period will include, for the initial distribution date, the period since the cutoff date. All of the preceding allocations will be made in accordance with the servicer’s customary servicing procedures.

“Available Principal” means for a distribution date: the sum, for the prior monthly period, of:

(1) that portion of all collections on the receivables held by the trust, other than Liquidating Receivables, allocable to principal,

(2) Liquidation Proceeds to the extent allocable to principal, and

(3) to the extent allocable to principal, the Warranty Payment or the Administrative Purchase Payment for each receivable that the depositor repurchased or the servicer purchased during that monthly period, except, that liquidation expenses as specified in the servicing agreement as an allowance for amounts charged to the account of the obligor, in keeping with the servicer’s customary procedures, for the refurbishing and disposition of the financed vehicle and other out-of-pocket costs incurred in the liquidation, will be excluded from “Available Principal.”

For purposes of this definition, references to the prior monthly period will include, for the initial distribution date, the period since the cutoff date. All of the preceding allocations will be made in accordance with the servicer’s customary servicing procedures.

“Basic Servicing Fee Rate” means 1.00% per annum.

“BHCA” means the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, as amended.

“business day” means any day other than a Saturday, Sunday or any other day on which banks in New York, New York or Detroit, Michigan may, or are required to, remain closed.

“Certificate Distribution Account” means any account so designated and established and maintained pursuant to the trust agreement.

“CFPB” means the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, a federal regulator with rulemaking and enforcement authority over consumer finance businesses.

113

“Class A Interest Carryover Shortfall” means, as of the close of any distribution date, the excess of the Aggregate Class A Interest Distributable Amount for that distribution date over the amount that was actually deposited in the Note Distribution Account on that distribution date in respect of interest for the Class A Notes.

“Class A Notes” means, collectively, the Class A-1 Notes, the Class A-2 Notes, the Class A-3 Notes and the Class A-4 Notes.

“Class A-1 Notes” means the 1.75000% Asset Backed Notes, Class A-1 issued by the trust.

“Class A-2 Notes” means the 2.14% Asset Backed Notes, Class A-2 issued by the trust.

“Class A-3 Notes” means the 2.35% Asset Backed Notes, Class A-3 issued by the trust.

“Class A-4 Notes” means the 2.53% Asset Backed Notes, Class A-4 issued by the trust.

“Class B Interest Carryover Shortfall” means, as of the close of any distribution date, the excess of the Aggregate Class B Interest Distributable Amount for that distribution date over the amount that was actually deposited in the Note Distribution Account on that distribution date in respect of interest for the Class B Notes.

“Class B Notes” means the 2.66% Asset Backed Notes, Class B issued by the trust.

“Class C Interest Carryover Shortfall” means, as of the close of any distribution date, the excess of the Aggregate Class C Interest Distributable Amount for that distribution date over the amount that was actually deposited in the Note Distribution Account on that distribution date in respect of interest for the Class C Notes.

“Class C Notes” means the 2.83% Asset Backed Notes, Class C issued by the trust.

“Class D Interest Carryover Shortfall” means, as of the close of any distribution date, the excess of the Aggregate Class D Interest Distributable Amount for that distribution date over the amount that was actually deposited in the Note Distribution Account on that distribution date in respect of interest for the Class D Notes.

“Class D Notes” means the 3.22% Asset Backed Notes, Class D issued by the trust.

“Collection Account” means the account so designated and established pursuant to the servicing agreement.

“Controlling Class” has the meaning set forth in “The Notes—Controlling Class.”

“CRR” has the meaning set forth in “Plan of Distribution.”

“cutoff date” means January 1, 2018.

“data and disclosure review” has the meaning set forth in “The Receivables Pool—Depositor Review of the Receivables Pool.”

“DBRS” means DBRS Ltd.

“delinquency trigger” has the meaning set forth in “The Receivables Pool—Asset Representations Review—Asset Representations Review Delinquency Trigger.”

“delinquent receivable” has the meaning set forth in “The Receivables Pool—Asset Representations Review—Asset Representations Review Delinquency Trigger.”

“Designated Accounts” means the Collection Account, the Note Distribution Account and the reserve account.

114

“Discount Rate” means 0.00% per annum.

“distribution dates” has the meaning set forth in “Summary—The Notes.”

“Dodd-Frank Act” means the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010.

“DTC” means The Depository Trust Company.

“Eligible Investments” has the meaning set forth in “The Transfer Agreements and the Servicing Agreements—Investment of Funds.”

“ERISA” means the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended.

“European Economic Area” has the meaning set forth in “Plan of Distribution—Matters Relating to the Offering of the Notes in Europe.”

“Events of Default” has the meaning set forth in “The Notes—The Indenture—Events of Default; Rights Upon Event of Default.”

“EVI” has the meaning set forth in “Summary—The Notes.”

“FATCA” has the meaning set forth in “Federal Income Tax Consequences—The Notes—Foreign Account Tax Compliance.”

“FDIA” means the Federal Deposit Insurance Act.

“FDIC” means the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.

“FDIC Rule” has the meaning set forth in “Risk Factors.”

“FDIC Rule Covenant” has the meaning set forth in “Insolvency Aspects of the Offerings—FDIC Rule.”

“Final Scheduled Distribution Date” means the final scheduled distribution date for (1) the Class A Notes and Class B Notes as set forth on the front cover page of this prospectus, (2) the Class C Notes, the distribution date on August 15, 2023 and (3) the Class D Notes, the distribution date on October 15, 2024.

“First Priority Principal Distributable Amount” means, with respect to any distribution date, an amount equal to the excess, if any, of (1) the aggregate outstanding principal balance of the Class A Notes as of the preceding distribution date (after giving effect to any principal payments made on the Class A Notes on such preceding distribution date) over (2) the aggregate receivables principal balance as of the close of business on the last day of the immediately preceding monthly period.

“Fitch” means Fitch Ratings, Inc.

“Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act” has the meaning set forth in “Federal Income Tax Consequences—The Notes—Foreign Account Tax Compliance.”

“Foreign Person” means a nonresident alien, foreign corporation or other non-United States person.

“Fourth Priority Principal Distributable Amount” means, with respect to any distribution date, an amount, not less than zero, equal to the difference between (1) the excess, if any, of (a) the aggregate outstanding principal balance of all the notes as of the preceding distribution date (after giving effect to any principal payments made on the notes on such preceding distribution date) over (b) the aggregate receivables principal balance as of the close of business on the last day of the immediately preceding monthly period, and (2) the sum of (a) the First Priority Principal Distributable Amount, if any, with respect to such distribution date, (b) the Second Priority

115

Principal Distributable Amount, if any, with respect to such distribution date, and (c) the Third Priority Principal Distributable Amount, if any, with respect to such distribution date.

“FRB” means the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.

“FSMA” has the meaning set forth in “Plan of Distribution—Matters Relating to the Offering of the Notes in Europe.”

“General Motors” means General Motors Company, and its successors and assigns, or General Motors LLC, and its successors and assigns.

“hypothetical pool of receivables” has the meaning set forth in “Weighted Average Life of the Notes.”

“IB Finance” means IB Finance Holding Company, LLC.

“information databases” has the meaning set forth in “The Receivables Pool—Depositor Review of the Receivables Pool.”

“initial aggregate receivables principal balance” has the meaning set forth in “Summary—The Receivables.”

“Internal Revenue Code” has the meaning set forth in “Summary—Tax Status.”

“Investment Company Act” means the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended.

“Liquidating Receivable” means a receivable:

(A) as to which the servicer has (1) reasonably determined, in accordance with its customary servicing procedures, that eventual payment of amounts owing on that receivable is unlikely, or (2) repossessed and disposed of the financed vehicle, and

(B) that the servicer has charged off.

“Liquidation Proceeds” means, for a Liquidating Receivable, all amounts realized for that receivable, net of amounts that are required to be refunded to the obligor on that receivable.

“Loan-to-Value Ratio” has the meaning set forth in “The Receivables Pool.”

“MiFID II” has the meaning set forth in “Plan of Distribution—Matters Relating to the Offering of the Notes in Europe.”

“Monthly Remittance Condition” means each of the following conditions:

(1) an entity other than Ally Bank is the servicer,

(2) no servicer default has occurred and is continuing, and

(3) the short-term unsecured debt of the servicer is rated equal to or higher than a specified level by each rating agency hired to rate the notes (such specified ratings being “R-1 (middle)” by DBRS, “F1” by Fitch, “P-1” by Moody’s or “A-1” by Standard & Poor’s, as applicable).

“Moody’s” means Moody’s Investors Service, Inc.

“non-subvented receivables” has the meaning set forth in “Summary—The Receivables.”

116

“Note Class Interest Distributable Amount” means, for any class of notes and any distribution date, the product of (1) the outstanding principal balance of that class as of the close of the preceding distribution date, or, in the case of the first distribution date, the outstanding principal balance of that class on the closing date, and (2) in the case of (a) the notes, other than the Class A-1 Notes, one-twelfth of the interest rate for that class, or, in the case of the first distribution date, the interest rate for that class multiplied by a fraction, the numerator of which is 15 and the denominator of which is 360, and (b) in the case of the Class A-1 Notes, the product of the interest rate for that class for that distribution date and a fraction, the numerator of which is the number of days elapsed from and including the prior distribution date (or, in the case of the first distribution date, from and including the closing date), to but excluding that distribution date and the denominator of which is 360.

“Note Distribution Account” means the account so designated and established and maintained pursuant to the servicing agreement.

“Note Pool Factor” means, for each class of notes, a seven-digit decimal which the servicer will compute prior to each distribution for the notes indicating the remaining outstanding principal balance of the notes, as of the close of the distribution date, as a fraction of the initial outstanding principal balance of the notes.

“Noteholders’ Regular Principal Distributable Amount” means, for the notes, with respect to any distribution date, an amount equal to the lesser of:

(1) the outstanding principal balance of the notes as of the preceding distribution date reduced by the Aggregate Noteholders’ Priority Principal Distributable Amount, if any, with respect to such distribution date, and

(2) the excess, if any, of:

(a) the Principal Distributable Amount over

(b) the Aggregate Noteholders’ Priority Principal Distributable Amount, if any, with respect to such distribution date.

Notwithstanding the foregoing, on or after the Final Scheduled Distribution Date for the Class D Notes, the Noteholders’ Regular Principal Distributable Amount will equal the greater of (1) the amount specified above and (2) the outstanding principal balance of the notes as of the preceding distribution date reduced by the Aggregate Noteholders’ Priority Principal Distributable Amount, if any, with respect to the then current distribution date.

“obligors” has the meaning set forth in “Summary—The Receivables.”

“offered notes” has the meaning set forth in “Summary—The Notes.”

“OID” has the meaning set forth in “Federal Income Tax Consequences.”

“OLA” means the Orderly Liquidation Authority established by the Dodd-Frank Act.

“overcollateralization target amount” has the meaning set forth in “Summary—The Receivables.”

“plan assets regulation” has the meaning set forth in “Considerations for ERISA and Other U.S. Employee Benefit Plans—Plan Assets Regulation.”

“pool review” has the meaning set forth in “The Receivables Pool—Depositor Review of the Receivables Pool.”

“pooling agreement” means the pooling agreement dated as of the closing date between Ally Bank and the depositor, as amended and supplemented from time to time.

117

“Principal Balance” means, as of any date for any receivable, the amount financed minus the sum of the following amounts:

(1) that portion of all payments received from the related obligor on or prior to that date allocable to principal, and

(2) any Warranty Payment or Administrative Purchase Payment received on or prior to such date to the extent allocable to principal.

“Principal Distributable Amount” means, with respect to any distribution date, the excess of (1) the aggregate principal balance of the Class A Notes, Class B Notes, the Class C Notes and the Class D Notes as of the preceding distribution date (after giving effect to any principal payments made on the notes on such distribution date) over (2) the result of the aggregate receivables principal balance as of the close of business on the last day of the immediately preceding monthly period minus the Overcollateralization Target Amount.

“process review” has the meaning set forth in “The Receivables Pool—Depositor Review of the Receivables Pool.”

“PTCE” has the meaning set forth in “Considerations for ERISA and Other U.S. Employee Benefit Plans.”

“receivable document file” has the meaning set forth in “The Receivables Pool—Depositor Review of the Receivables Pool.”

“receivables” has the meaning set forth in “Summary—The Receivables.”

“Receivables Principal Balance” means, with respect to a receivable, as of any date, the present value of the scheduled monthly payments on the receivable, with the receivable being discounted from the last day of the calendar month in which payments are to become due to that date at the greater of the Discount Rate and the APR of the receivable.

“record date” has the meaning set forth in “Summary—The Notes.”

“Related Documents” means the indenture, the Transfer Agreements and Servicing Agreements and other similar and associated documents for the trust.

“remaining payments” has the meaning set forth in “Summary—The Receivables.”

“reviewed receivables” has the meaning set forth in “The Receivables Pool—Depositor Review of the Receivables Pool.”

“Second Priority Principal Distributable Amount” means, with respect to any distribution date, an amount not less than zero equal to the difference between (1) the excess, if any, of (a) the aggregate outstanding principal balance of the Class A Notes and the Class B Notes as of the preceding distribution date (after giving effect to any principal payments made on the Class A Notes and the Class B Notes on such preceding distribution date) over (b) the aggregate receivables principal balance as of the close of business on the last day of the immediately preceding monthly period, and (2) the First Priority Principal Distributable Amount, if any, with respect to such distribution date.

“SEC” means the Securities and Exchange Commission.

“Securities Act” means the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.

“Securitization Regulation” has the meaning set forth in “Plan of Distribution.”

118

“Servicer Default” has the meaning set forth in “The Transfer Agreements and the Servicing Agreements—Servicer Defaults.”

“servicing agreement” means the servicing agreement, dated as of the closing date, among the servicer, the depositor and the trust, as amended and supplemented from time to time.

“simple interest receivables” means receivables which provide for the allocation of payments between finance charges and principal based on the actual date on which a payment is received.

“Similar Law” has the meaning set forth in “Considerations for ERISA and Other U.S. Employee Benefit Plans.”

“Solvency II” has the meaning set forth in “Plan of Distribution.”

“special purpose entity” has the meaning set forth in “Insolvency Aspects of the Offering—Consequences of Insolvency Regimes for Payments on the Notes.”

“Specified Reserve Account Balance” has the meaning set forth in “The Transfer Agreements and the Servicing Agreements—Credit Enhancement.”

“Standard & Poor’s” means S&P Global Ratings.

“subvented receivables” has the meaning set forth in “Summary—The Receivables.”

“Sykes” means Sykes Enterprises, Incorporated.

“Third Priority Principal Distributable Amount” means, with respect to any distribution date, an amount not less than zero equal to the difference between (1) the excess, if any, of (a) the aggregate outstanding principal balance of the Class A Notes, the Class B Notes and the Class C Notes as of the preceding distribution date (after giving effect to any principal payments made on the Class A Notes, the Class B Notes and the Class C Notes on such preceding distribution date) over (b) the aggregate receivables principal balance as of the close of business on the last day of the immediately preceding monthly period, and (2) the sum of (a) the First Priority Principal Distributable Amount, if any, with respect to such distribution date and (b) the Second Priority Principal Distributable Amount, if any, with respect to such distribution date.

“Transfer Agreements and Servicing Agreements” means the pooling agreement, the trust sale agreement, the servicing agreement, the trust agreement, the custodian agreement and the administration agreement.

“Treasury” means the U.S. Department of Treasury.

“trust” has the meaning set forth in “Summary—The Parties.”

“Trust Indenture Act” means the Trust Indenture Act of 1939, as amended.

“trust sale agreement” means the trust sale agreement, dated as of the closing date, between the depositor and the trust, as amended and supplemented from time to time.

“Vote Tabulation Agent” has the meaning set forth in “The Receivables Pool—Asset Representations Review—Voting.”

“Warranty Payment” means, for a Warranty Receivable, the Receivables Principal Balance plus one month of interest on the receivable, calculated at the greater of the Discount Rate and the APR, minus the sum of:

(A) that portion of all payments received on or prior to the last day of the prior monthly period allocable to principal, and

119

(B) any Liquidation Proceeds for that receivable, to the extent applied to reduce the Principal Balance of that receivable.

“Warranty Receivable” means a receivable which must be repurchased by either the depositor or the seller as a result of a breach of a representation or warranty for that receivable which materially and adversely affects the interests of any securityholder in that receivable.

“Weighted Average Annual Percentage Rate of all Receivables in Pool” has the meaning set forth in “The Receivables Pool.”

“Weighted Average Annual Percentage Rate of Non-Subvented Receivables in Pool” has the meaning set forth in “The Receivables Pool.”

“Weighted Average FICO Score” has the meaning set forth in “The Receivables Pool.”

“Weighted Average Loan-to-Value Ratio” has the meaning set forth in “The Receivables Pool.”

“Weighted Average Original Maturity” has the meaning set forth in “The Receivables Pool.”

120

APPENDIX A: STATIC POOL DATA

The following information represents static pool data from the sponsor’s public securitizations in 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016 and 2017. This information is incorporated by reference into the prospectus. In cases of omitted information from the following tables, such omitted information is either unavailable or would only be available with unreasonable effort or expense.

In the following tables, actual prepayments on a receivable are any principal reductions related to that receivable in excess of the scheduled principal payment for that receivable for the applicable period. These include voluntary prepayments, payments from third parties, repurchases, repossession proceeds and funds not recovered due to charge-offs.

The “Prepayment Speeds” shown in the tables below are the percentage of the actual principal balance of the pool represented by the difference between the actual month-end principal balance of the pool and the scheduled month-end principal balance of the pool. The amount by which the actual principal balance is lower than the scheduled principal balance is the prepayment amount. The Prepayment Speed follows the Bond Market Association standard formula for computing ABS prepayment speeds. The single month mortality rate or “SMM,” the percentage of remaining loans that prepay each month, is divided by the age (in months) of the remaining pool less one, times the SMM, plus one, to determine the Prepayment Speed. Where “Clean-up Call Exercised” appears in the prepayment speed column, the servicer exercised its option to purchase the receivables in the month indicated, as described in the prospectus under “The Transfer Agreements and the Servicing Agreements—Termination.”

The “Net Loss Statistics” represent actual charge-offs, net of recoveries. Net losses include the initial write-down to estimated fair market value of all repossessed vehicles in the month of repossession, as well as accounts that are 120 days past due and bankruptcies that are 60 days past due and past notification. With respect to Net Loss Statistics, the amount presented represents the net losses for the reporting period, as well as a percentage of the undiscounted initial aggregate receivables principal balance.

We have included delinquency statistics for the 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016 and 2017 public securitizations of the sponsor. A “delinquent” receivable is a receivable for which payment of the required payment amount within $25 has not been received by the servicer by the payment due date as of the end of the monthly period. The “Delinquency Data” for these pools represents accounts greater than 30 days delinquent at the reporting date, which is the end of the calendar month. Charged off receivables are not considered delinquent receivables and therefore are not included in the delinquency calculation. The number of units and the total dollar amount of delinquencies between 31 and 60 days, 61 and 90 days, 91 and 120 days and 121 days or more, at the reporting date, are given, as well as the aggregate amount financed of 61 days or more delinquent receivables as a percentage of the aggregate amount financed of all outstanding receivables.

The initial characteristics of the pools presented may differ from those of the receivables described in this prospectus. These differences, along with the varying economic conditions applicable to the securitized pools, may impact the performance of securitized pools. There can be no assurance that the performance of the prior securitization transactions outlined in this Appendix A will correspond to, or be an accurate predictor of, the performance of the receivables described in this prospectus.

Notwithstanding the fact that Ally Bank originated or acquired the receivables that were included in each prior securitized pool that is described in this Appendix A and also originated all of the receivables that are described in this prospectus, the original characteristics of each prior securitized pool will likely differ, in some cases in material ways, from the receivables described in this prospectus. Nevertheless, our underwriting and origination procedures have remained relatively stable over time and so the prior securitized pools are generally comparable to the receivables described in this prospectus. The tables that follow show the characteristics of each pool presented as compared to the characteristics of the receivables described in this prospectus.

Any reference to a “weighted average” represents the weighted average at the time of origination of a receivable and is based on the original amount financed, except for the “Weighted Average Remaining Maturity,” which represents the remaining term of the receivable as of the applicable cutoff dates. The “Weighted Average APR” in the following table are based on weighting by amount financed and remaining term of each receivable, each as of the cutoff date. The “Weighted Average Original Maturity” in the following table is based on weighting by original undiscounted principal balance of each receivable as of its date of origination.

“Subvented receivables” were acquired or originated by Ally Bank under special incentive rate financing programs. “Non-subvented receivables” are the remaining retail instalment sale contracts and direct purchase money loans that are not subvented receivables.

“Weighted Average FICO Score” is based on a weighting by original undiscounted principal balance of each receivable as of the cutoff date and excludes receivables with respect to which the obligor is a business account and receivables for which no FICO score is available. “Loan-to-Value Ratio” with respect to a receivable means the original undiscounted principal balance divided by the estimated vehicle value, multiplied by 100. The estimated vehicle value for a new vehicle is the dealer invoice cost of the vehicle. The estimated vehicle value for a used vehicle is the value received by Ally Financial or Ally Bank from the dealer, independently

A-1

validated by Ally Financial or Ally Bank, based on a market guide, such as Blackbook, indicating the value of the vehicle and the source from which that value was determined. “Weighted Average Loan-to-Value Ratio” is based on a weighting by original undiscounted principal balance of each receivable as of its date of origination. A FICO score is a measurement designed by Fair, Isaac & Company and calculated by the major credit bureaus using collected information to assess credit risk.

The initial receivables pool statistics for the 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016 and 2017 public securitizations are presented as of the applicable cutoff dates.

A-2

ALLY AUTO RECEIVABLES TRUST 2013-1

Initial Aggregate Amount Financed: $1,291,999,804.55

		Net Loss Statistics
		Total for Month					Cumulative
Month	Prepayment Speeds	$			%		$		%
Mar-13	1.17		9,587.52			0.000742%		9,587.52		0.000742%
Apr-13	1.36		19,152.33			0.001482%		28,739.85		0.002224%
May-13	1.28		100,351.72			0.007767%		129,091.57		0.009992%
Jun-13	1.16		245,672.85			0.019015%		374,764.42		0.029007%
Jul-13	1.50		95,246.38			0.007372%		470,010.80		0.036379%
Aug-13	1.29		40,556.23			0.003139%		510,567.03		0.039518%
Sep-13	1.24		136,509.45			0.010566%		647,076.48		0.050083%
Oct-13	1.27		142,883.35			0.011059%		789,959.83		0.061142%
Nov-13	1.14		200,895.43			0.015549%		990,855.26		0.076692%
Dec-13	1.28		234,772.88			0.018171%		1,225,628.14		0.094863%
Jan-14	1.23		193,610.12			0.014985%		1,419,238.26		0.109848%
Feb-14	1.15		61,175.27			0.004735%		1,480,413.53		0.114583%
Mar-14	1.31		147,401.67			0.011409%		1,627,815.20		0.125992%
Apr-14	1.40		193,325.22			0.014963%		1,821,140.42		0.140955%
May-14	1.36		127,803.31			0.009892%		1,948,943.73		0.150847%
Jun-14	1.40		153,725.55			0.011898%		2,102,669.28		0.162745%
Jul-14	1.46		237,056.31			0.018348%		2,339,725.59		0.181093%
Aug-14	1.30		109,182.97			0.008451%		2,448,908.56		0.189544%
Sep-14	1.42		218,891.92			0.016942%		2,667,800.48		0.206486%
Oct-14	1.32		156,602.26			0.012121%		2,824,402.74		0.218607%
Nov-14	1.05		183,043.30			0.014167%		3,007,446.04		0.232774%
Dec-14	1.32		125,656.63			0.009726%		3,133,102.67		0.242500%
Jan-15	1.17		88,896.96			0.006881%		3,221,999.63		0.249381%
Feb-15	1.06		41,794.53			0.003235%		3,263,794.16		0.252616%
Mar-15	1.37		72,561.62			0.005616%		3,336,355.78		0.258232%
Apr-15	1.33		32,124.14			0.002486%		3,368,479.92		0.260718%
May-15	1.13		398.56			0.000031%		3,368,878.48		0.260749%
Jun-15	1.32		33,346.40			0.002581%		3,402,224.88		0.263330%
Jul-15	1.35		32,611.03			0.002524%		3,434,835.91		0.265854%
Aug-15	1.24		108,607.02			0.008406%		3,543,442.93		0.274260%
Sep-15	1.22		121,385.88			0.009395%		3,664,828.81		0.283656%
Oct-15	1.20		114,304.07			0.008847%		3,779,132.88		0.292503%
Nov-15	1.10		82,380.90			0.006376%		3,861,513.78		0.298879%
Dec-15	1.14		96,453.74			0.007465%		3,957,967.52		0.306344%
Jan-16	1.09		97,918.49			0.007579%		4,055,886.01		0.313923%
Feb-16	1.24		113,478.32			0.008783%		4,169,364.33		0.322706%
Mar-16	1.15		44,304.90			0.003429%		4,213,669.23		0.326135%
Apr-16	1.08		56,062.58			0.004339%		4,269,731.81		0.330475%
May-16	1.19		38,004.78			0.002942%		4,307,736.59		0.333416%
Jun-16	1.09		(28,791.75	)		-0.002228%		4,278,944.84		0.331188%
Jul-16	0.99		27,052.18			0.002094%		4,305,997.02		0.333282%
Aug-16	1.19		27,357.29			0.002117%		4,333,354.31		0.335399%
Sep-16	1.10		85,897.02			0.006648%		4,419,251.33		0.342047%
Oct-16	1.03		(956.19	)		-0.000074%		4,418,295.14		0.341973%
Nov-16	Clean Up Call Exercised

A-3

AART 2013-1: Delinquency Data

Month	Units								$								% 61+ days  delinquent
	31-60		61-90		91-120		121+		31-60		61-90		91-120		121+
Mar-13		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		0.000000%
Apr-13		143		26		—		—		3,207,282.82		634,445.13		—		—		0.052589%
May-13		167		23		11		—		3,565,918.58		484,566.06		315,032.92		—		0.068664%
Jun-13		204		25		5		3		4,395,674.17		538,778.07		106,482.96		122,780.50		0.068246%
Jul-13		230		39		3		—		4,832,915.47		1,004,355.19		72,281.74		—		0.099595%
Aug-13		223		41		4		—		4,681,562.43		816,151.03		103,715.87		—		0.088349%
Sep-13		228		35		6		—		4,608,358.34		740,777.51		98,426.07		—		0.083681%
Oct-13		238		37		7		—		4,807,571.07		741,734.73		107,207.96		—		0.088004%
Nov-13		297		39		5		—		6,052,423.98		659,083.13		124,127.00		—		0.084278%
Dec-13		322		54		5		—		6,303,550.43		1,025,951.10		94,430.05		—		0.125552%
Jan-14		262		45		5		—		5,213,550.03		874,474.86		121,006.05		—		0.116148%
Feb-14		223		35		9		—		4,180,175.89		736,793.76		164,403.03		—		0.109402%
Mar-14		222		25		10		—		4,097,939.75		538,430.63		220,932.67		—		0.096311%
Apr-14		243		43		6		—		4,565,609.34		815,360.35		85,464.27		—		0.119663%
May-14		275		45		6		—		5,020,638.75		880,721.70		94,853.01		—		0.135778%
Jun-14		267		49		12		—		4,778,302.13		884,025.55		190,713.78		—		0.157012%
Jul-14		275		33		5		—		4,969,045.64		539,867.96		89,644.45		—		0.096794%
Aug-14		320		42		7		—		5,316,727.70		837,147.64		110,374.20		—		0.152941%
Sep-14		281		55		9		—		4,603,725.81		896,652.58		184,622.77		—		0.183947%
Oct-14		255		47		13		—		4,210,042.30		672,325.35		148,710.25		—		0.147037%
Nov-14		363		41		12		—		5,810,601.75		643,465.86		150,091.62		—		0.148882%
Dec-14		354		39		11		—		5,348,100.83		598,665.73		170,772.49		—		0.152392%
Jan-15		345		59		9		—		5,306,510.85		895,892.43		151,639.69		—		0.218408%
Feb-15		263		49		12		—		4,031,344.23		730,272.33		183,312.84		—		0.200264%
Mar-15		228		36		8		—		3,403,084.61		491,727.98		118,734.18		—		0.142085%
Apr-15		217		30		3		—		2,976,003.68		434,159.29		27,685.37		—		0.114105%
May-15		249		42		5		—		3,497,409.34		568,892.61		68,234.24		—		0.166404%
Jun-15		264		43		7		—		3,697,680.20		670,890.76		60,303.22		—		0.203300%
Jul-15		256		41		9		—		3,383,839.04		616,171.31		163,435.88		—		0.231414%
Aug-15		273		47		13		—		3,687,883.73		619,628.06		163,883.86		—		0.247754%
Sep-15		264		53		10		1		3,164,917.35		730,157.36		105,052.80		28,185.89		0.291075%
Oct-15		282		59		10		—		3,413,624.50		766,935.95		120,170.62		—		0.319226%
Nov-15		267		59		10		—		3,170,345.02		750,145.61		93,984.46		—		0.323612%
Dec-15		281		56		6		—		3,329,839.52		657,387.67		51,162.21		—		0.290348%
Jan-16		287		54		14		—		3,366,380.18		611,333.26		109,259.51		—		0.315694%
Feb-16		207		41		11		—		2,136,200.64		478,018.00		127,137.35		—		0.285679%
Mar-16		184		28		11		1		1,936,614.90		290,338.75		127,538.61		19,607.87		0.222343%
Apr-16		183		30		4		—		1,845,516.02		324,363.69		29,207.87		—		0.193322%
May-16		193		29		5		—		1,790,009.31		293,789.95		47,923.75		—		0.202525%
Jun-16		197		30		7		—		1,996,994.13		304,969.00		60,013.88		—		0.234163%
Jul-16		199		42		7		—		1,830,381.52		438,262.07		72,600.28		—		0.354604%
Aug-16		200		33		8		—		1,923,690.78		264,996.16		102,721.56		—		0.279185%
Sep-16		213		27		6		—		1,678,689.93		251,393.28		41,981.43		—		0.243277%
Oct-16		220		33		7		—		1,721,326.86		262,422.18		75,752.47		—		0.306136%

A-4

Initial Receivables Pool Characteristics

	AART 2013-1		AART 2018-1
Weighted Average APR		3.53%		5.88%
Aggregate Amount Financed		$1,291,999,804.55	$	1,119,773,433.38
Number of Contracts in Pool		58,552		69,471
Average Amount Financed		$22,065.85	$	16,118.57
Weighted Average Original Maturity (in Months)		64.78		66.13
Weighted Average Remaining Maturity (in Months)		54.00		52.68
Percentage of Receivables with Original Maturities > 60 Months		58.93%		67.25%
Percentage of New Vehicles		80.41%		70.02%
Percentage of Non-Subvented Receivables		57.38%		97.50%
Weighted Average FICO Score		744.71		737.09
Weighted Average Loan-to-Value		96.38		94.21
Cutoff Date		March 1, 2013		January 1, 2018

Distribution of the Initial Receivables Pool by Annual Percentage Rate

Annual Percentage     Rate Range	AART 2013-1						AART 2018-1
	Number of   Contracts		Aggregate Amount Financed		Percentage of  Aggregate Amount Financed		Number of Contracts		Aggregate Amount Financed		Percentage of  Aggregate Amount Financed
0.00% to 1.00%		15,175	$	408,381,653.86		31.61%		2,188	$	24,002,778.51		2.14%
1.01% to 2.00%		2,958	$	61,457,053.64		4.76%		283	$	3,487,239.11		0.31%
2.01% to 3.00%		6,331	$	121,657,320.90		9.42%		8,161	$	142,123,125.14		12.69%
3.01% to 4.00%		8,607	$	184,624,375.81		14.29%		11,841	$	203,436,277.26		18.17%
4.01% to 5.00%		7,525	$	162,497,843.48		12.58%		10,786	$	174,599,348.76		15.59%
5.01% to 6.00%		6,747	$	137,453,450.07		10.64%		9,820	$	159,982,516.73		14.29%
6.01% to 7.00%		3,667	$	74,544,398.23		5.77%		7,670	$	126,850,724.30		11.33%
7.01% to 8.00%		3,941	$	75,979,953.56		5.88%		6,197	$	96,679,202.21		8.63%
8.01% to 9.00%		1,311	$	24,395,000.79		1.89%		4,461	$	70,886,858.80		6.33%
9.01% to 10.00%		1,360	$	25,953,550.09		2.01%		3,125	$	47,951,310.77		4.28%
10.01% to 11.00%		479	$	8,067,782.58		0.62%		2,133	$	32,280,059.54		2.88%
11.01% to 12.00%		228	$	3,376,229.31		0.26%		1,384	$	19,947,211.10		1.78%
12.01% to 13.00%		119	$	1,923,238.42		0.15%		758	$	9,879,786.59		0.88%
13.01% to 14.00%		74	$	1,199,679.46		0.09%		386	$	4,757,178.45		0.42%
14.01% to 15.00%		26	$	446,423.64		0.03%		179	$	1,962,216.15		0.18%
15.01% to 16.00%		3	$	36,736.26		0.00%		67	$	661,653.00		0.06%
16.01% to 17.00%		1	$	5,114.45		0.00%		27	$	240,694.10		0.02%
17.01% to 18.00%		—	$	—		—%		5	$	45,352.86		0.00%
18.01% to 19.00%		—	$	—		—%		—	$	—		—%
Total		58,552	$	1,291,999,804.55		100.00%		69,471	$	1,119,773,433.38		100.00%

A-5

Distribution of the Initial Receivables Pool by State

The following tables set forth the percentage of the Aggregate Amount Financed in the states with the largest concentration of receivables for each of these pools. The following breakdown by state is based on the billing addresses of the obligors on the receivables:

AART 2013-1
State	Percentage of Aggregate   Amount Financed
Texas	12.18%
Florida	7.10%
Pennsylvania	5.71%
Michigan	5.12%
California	5.11%
Illinois	4.44%

The AART 2013-1 pool of receivables includes receivables originated in all 50 states and the District of Columbia. No other state accounts for more than 3.97% of the Aggregate Amount Financed for the AART 2013-1 pool of receivables.

AART 2018-1
State	Percentage of Aggregate   Amount Financed
Texas	13.50%
California	9.48%
Florida	9.28%
Pennsylvania	4.57%
Illinois	4.28%
Georgia	4.16%

The AART 2018-1 pool of receivables includes receivables originated in all 50 states and the District of Columbia. No other state accounts for more than 3.78% of the Aggregate Amount Financed for the AART 2018-1 pool of receivables.

Distribution of the Initial Receivables Pool by Vehicle Make

AART 2013-1
Vehicle Make	Percentage of Aggregate   Amount Financed
Chevrolet	38.15%
GMC	15.67%
Dodge	12.76%
Jeep	9.17%
Buick	4.83%
Cadillac	4.54%
Chrysler	3.84%
Ford	2.62%
Fiat	1.31%
KIA	1.24%

No other make accounts for more than 1.02% of the Aggregate Amount Financed in the AART 2013-1 pool of receivables.

AART 2018-1
Vehicle Make	Percentage of Aggregate   Amount Financed
Chevrolet	33.35%
GMC	9.42%
Ford	8.40%
Jeep	7.59%
Ram	6.02%
Nissan	4.20%
Dodge	4.08%
Kia	3.64%
Toyota	3.60%
Hyundai	3.28%

No other make accounts for more than 2.97% of the Aggregate Amount Financed in the AART 2018-1 pool of receivables.

A-6

Distribution of the Initial Receivables Pool by Vehicle Model

AART 2013-1
Vehicle Model	Percentage of Aggregate   Amount Financed
C/K Pickup	12.43%
Ram Pickup	6.75%
Sierra	5.61%
Acadia	4.65%
Wrangler	4.16%
Enclave	3.40%
Traverse	3.32%
Yukon	3.30%
Equinox	3.29%
Cruze	2.99%

No other model accounts for more than 2.90% of the Aggregate Amount Financed in the AART 2013-1 pool of receivables.

AART 2018-1
Vehicle Model	Percentage of Aggregate   Amount Financed
Silverado	11.31%
Sierra	4.63%
Ram Pickup	4.57%
Equinox	3.53%
Grand Cherokee	2.96%
Cruze	2.75%
Malibu	2.59%
Wrangler	2.18%
Express	1.93%
Traverse	1.80%

No other model accounts for more than 1.51% of the Aggregate Amount Financed in the AART 2018-1 pool of receivables.

A-7

ALLY AUTO RECEIVABLES TRUST 2013-2

Initial Aggregate Amount Financed: $1,107,007,846.82

		Net Loss Statistics
		Total for Month						Cumulative
Month	Prepayment Speeds	$			%			$		%
Oct-13	1.19		600.00			0.000054	%		600.00		0.000054	%
Nov-13	1.11		48,447.16			0.004376	%		49,047.16		0.004431	%
Dec-13	0.99		13,338.08			0.001205	%		62,385.24		0.005635	%
Jan-14	1.17		181,376.41			0.016384	%		243,761.65		0.022020	%
Feb-14	1.06		197,704.36			0.017859	%		441,466.01		0.039879	%
Mar-14	1.36		183,850.21			0.016608	%		625,316.22		0.056487	%
Apr-14	1.38		287,426.83			0.025964	%		912,743.05		0.082451	%
May-14	1.35		177,886.25			0.016069	%		1,090,629.30		0.098520	%
Jun-14	1.34		249,821.20			0.022567	%		1,340,450.50		0.121088	%
Jul-14	1.45		140,414.03			0.012684	%		1,480,864.53		0.133772	%
Aug-14	1.26		209,348.96			0.018911	%		1,690,213.49		0.152683	%
Sep-14	1.39		165,505.64			0.014951	%		1,855,719.13		0.167634	%
Oct-14	1.28		181,366.49			0.016383	%		2,037,085.62		0.184017	%
Nov-14	1.05		258,459.80			0.023348	%		2,295,545.42		0.207365	%
Dec-14	1.34		247,279.91			0.022338	%		2,542,825.33		0.229703	%
Jan-15	1.21		256,022.31			0.023127	%		2,798,847.64		0.252830	%
Feb-15	1.07		58,198.42			0.005257	%		2,857,046.06		0.258087	%
Mar-15	1.38		180,513.98			0.016306	%		3,037,560.04		0.274394	%
Apr-15	1.32		175,511.14			0.015855	%		3,213,071.18		0.290248	%
May-15	1.13		138,676.91			0.012527	%		3,351,748.09		0.302775	%
Jun-15	1.39		78,865.42			0.007124	%		3,430,613.51		0.309900	%
Jul-15	1.37		142,306.98			0.012855	%		3,572,920.49		0.322755	%
Aug-15	1.31		104,558.71			0.009445	%		3,677,479.20		0.332200	%
Sep-15	1.28		119,827.20			0.010824	%		3,797,306.40		0.343024	%
Oct-15	1.25		93,232.30			0.008422	%		3,890,538.70		0.351446	%
Nov-15	1.18		33,451.80			0.003022	%		3,923,990.50		0.354468	%
Dec-15	1.32		91,106.51			0.008230	%		4,015,097.01		0.362698	%
Jan-16	1.17		103,654.38			0.009363	%		4,118,751.39		0.372062	%
Feb-16	1.22		125,689.09			0.011354	%		4,244,440.48		0.383416	%
Mar-16	1.30		67,983.38			0.006141	%		4,312,423.86		0.389557	%
Apr-16	1.17		121,334.46			0.010961	%		4,433,758.32		0.400517	%
May-16	1.23		101,815.50			0.009197	%		4,535,573.82		0.409715	%
Jun-16	1.17		60,875.67			0.005499	%		4,596,449.49		0.415214	%
Jul-16	1.16		89,292.61			0.008066	%		4,685,742.10		0.423280	%
Aug-16	1.26		79,819.93			0.007210	%		4,765,562.03		0.430490	%
Sep-16	1.20		66,658.63			0.006022	%		4,832,220.66		0.436512	%
Oct-16	1.13		(15,177.27	)		-0.001371	%		4,817,043.39		0.435141	%
Nov-16	1.05		69,918.00			0.006316	%		4,886,961.39		0.441457	%
Dec-16	1.05		75,271.09			0.006800	%		4,962,232.48		0.448256	%
Jan-17	1.17		75,126.85			0.006786	%		5,037,359.33		0.455043	%
Feb-17	1.06		92,592.12			0.008364	%		5,129,951.45		0.463407	%
Mar-17	1.21		110.73			0.000010	%		5,130,062.18		0.463417	%
Apr-17	0.97		88,111.59			0.007959	%		5,218,173.77		0.471376	%
May-17	1.12		34,343.00			0.003102	%		5,252,516.77		0.474479	%
Jun-17	1.10		77,771.77			0.007025	%		5,330,288.54		0.481504	%
July-17	Clean Up Call Exercised

A-8

AART 2013-2: Delinquency Data

Month	Units								$								% 61+ days delinquent
	31-60		61-90		91-120		121+		31-60		61-90		91-120		121+
Oct-13		175		—		—		—		3,693,554.58		—		—		—		0.000000	%
Nov-13		210		34		—		—		4,384,193.81		689,204.98		—		—		0.066339	%
Dec-13		263		40		13		—		5,675,278.67		897,184.02		230,694.64		—		0.111931	%
Jan-14		258		47		7		—		5,370,382.38		1,122,060.40		170,235.82		—		0.132604	%
Feb-14		188		40		7		—		4,021,227.40		790,963.20		196,549.21		—		0.104664	%
Mar-14		211		30		9		—		4,307,655.51		707,077.71		191,099.05		—		0.098858	%
Apr-14		218		40		7		—		4,534,710.84		902,562.25		212,050.33		—		0.127497	%
May-14		243		37		6		—		5,062,033.94		750,019.39		138,450.73		—		0.105663	%
Jun-14		234		38		4		—		4,311,047.19		899,717.64		109,627.67		—		0.124861	%
Jul-14		264		43		10		—		4,955,986.78		777,987.10		199,674.62		—		0.126165	%
Aug-14		284		56		11		—		5,577,937.63		1,057,515.39		196,290.10		—		0.168343	%
Sep-14		264		43		14		1		4,939,627.77		732,942.19		330,947.84		17,095.54		0.151487	%
Oct-14		253		49		5		—		4,894,375.41		999,084.99		56,783.51		—		0.154251	%
Nov-14		337		55		12		—		6,292,593.71		1,057,260.12		229,094.98		—		0.195244	%
Dec-14		335		59		12		—		5,846,694.94		976,381.39		233,331.76		—		0.191980	%
Jan-15		299		60		17		—		5,255,943.55		1,062,433.49		215,176.30		—		0.211621	%
Feb-15		236		33		8		—		4,270,950.76		469,342.97		136,301.21		—		0.104518	%
Mar-15		265		19		6		1		4,748,368.68		324,459.21		83,043.44		24,802.07		0.078343	%
Apr-15		257		40		6		1		4,258,464.24		741,413.14		71,488.23		24,802.07		0.159302	%
May-15		274		47		3		—		4,307,374.21		743,766.81		36,131.09		—		0.155134	%
Jun-15		286		57		12		—		4,719,496.18		895,993.76		202,970.10		—		0.230337	%
Jul-15		258		56		11		—		4,131,259.80		900,883.19		168,997.44		—		0.236419	%
Aug-15		291		54		7		—		4,623,886.98		800,379.58		106,649.34		—		0.211208	%
Sep-15		294		61		5		—		4,668,558.00		972,696.95		51,839.91		—		0.251517	%
Oct-15		285		58		11		—		4,062,101.94		908,817.50		175,502.45		—		0.280816	%
Nov-15		283		62		16		1		4,129,980.31		833,969.16		290,253.75		19,525.34		0.312273	%
Dec-15		297		58		9		—		4,131,675.85		785,827.20		156,169.88		—		0.272637	%
Jan-16		288		67		10		—		4,130,295.41		912,152.02		157,401.05		—		0.327152	%
Feb-16		233		42		8		1		3,227,925.17		538,519.69		148,700.53		22,050.75		0.229949	%
Mar-16		181		35		12		1		2,463,812.91		492,266.81		142,804.78		22,050.75		0.226861	%
Apr-16		237		31		12		—		3,274,456.60		379,644.97		155,866.60		—		0.196294	%
May-16		221		40		3		—		3,098,490.10		479,105.85		37,061.70		—		0.201616	%
Jun-16		226		50		7		—		2,768,885.30		667,169.24		55,285.26		—		0.300611	%
Jul-16		224		50		5		—		2,744,409.87		628,599.84		64,324.76		—		0.307644	%
Aug-16		219		32		10		—		2,499,137.99		369,803.90		98,538.03		—		0.223047	%
Sep-16		193		33		10		—		2,181,654.53		347,058.44		130,880.54		—		0.244080	%
Oct-16		218		42		8		—		2,317,883.50		429,679.67		83,430.59		—		0.280852	%
Nov-16		223		52		8		—		2,455,086.18		575,454.17		52,911.45		—		0.368322	%
Dec-16		241		52		14		—		2,501,999.93		554,809.28		107,939.91		—		0.417101	%
Jan-17		211		48		13		—		2,232,464.04		467,340.23		121,500.07		—		0.400845	%
Feb-17		178		44		5		—		1,757,743.92		455,998.12		71,883.27		—		0.387937	%
Mar-17		179		30		7		—		1,651,408.11		282,406.96		74,390.18		—		0.285960	%
Apr-17		193		39		6		3		1,800,819.92		321,311.29		44,278.88		41,695.73		0.353180	%
May-17		203		29		8		—		1,795,035.49		241,174.14		59,753.12		—		0.284988	%
Jun-17		182		37		4		—		1,511,829.63		271,125.31		36,144.96		—		0.318621	%

A-9

Initial Receivables Pool Characteristics

	AART 2013-2		AART 2018-1
Weighted Average APR		3.61%		5.88%
Aggregate Amount Financed		$1,107,007,846.82	$	1,119,773,433.38
Number of Contracts in Pool		49,460		69,471
Average Amount Financed		$22,381.88	$	16,118.57
Weighted Average Original Maturity (in Months)		65.54		66.13
Weighted Average Remaining Maturity (in Months)		55.58		52.68
Percentage of Receivables with Original Maturities > 60 Months		61.97%		67.25%
Percentage of New Vehicles		77.89%		70.02%
Percentage of Non-Subvented Receivables		65.37%		97.50%
Weighted Average FICO Score		742.91		737.09
Weighted Average Loan-to-Value		96.15		94.21
Cutoff Date		October 1, 2013		January 1, 2018

Distribution of the Initial Receivables Pool by Annual Percentage Rate

Annual Percentage Rate Range	AART 2013-2							AART 2018-1
	Number of  Contracts		Aggregate Amount Financed			Percentage of  Aggregate Amount Financed		Number of Contracts		Aggregate Amount Financed			Percentage of  Aggregate Amount Financed
0.00% to 1.00%		10,802		$	295,244,854.98		26.67%		2,188		$	24,002,778.51		2.14%
1.01% to 2.00%		2,128		$	46,823,242.18		4.23%		283		$	3,487,239.11		0.31%
2.01% to 3.00%		7,179		$	150,197,907.73		13.57%		8,161		$	142,123,125.14		12.69%
3.01% to 4.00%		8,046		$	175,497,161.23		15.85%		11,841		$	203,436,277.26		18.17%
4.01% to 5.00%		7,594		$	165,879,018.45		14.98%		10,786		$	174,599,348.76		15.59%
5.01% to 6.00%		5,483		$	111,677,503.76		10.09%		9,820		$	159,982,516.73		14.29%
6.01% to 7.00%		3,186		$	64,741,985.88		5.85%		7,670		$	126,850,724.30		11.33%
7.01% to 8.00%		2,670		$	50,646,303.73		4.58%		6,197		$	96,679,202.21		8.63%
8.01% to 9.00%		1,072		$	21,430,140.47		1.94%		4,461		$	70,886,858.80		6.33%
9.01% to 10.00%		694		$	13,868,396.50		1.25%		3,125		$	47,951,310.77		4.28%
10.01% to 11.00%		354		$	6,638,005.89		0.60%		2,133		$	32,280,059.54		2.88%
11.01% to 12.00%		150		$	2,590,692.71		0.23%		1,384		$	19,947,211.10		1.78%
12.01% to 13.00%		59		$	1,169,795.66		0.11%		758		$	9,879,786.59		0.88%
13.01% to 14.00%		23		$	303,713.81		0.03%		386		$	4,757,178.45		0.42%
14.01% to 15.00%		14		$	235,082.76		0.02%		179		$	1,962,216.15		0.18%
15.01% to 16.00%		3		$	32,219.38		0.00%		67		$	661,653.00		0.06%
16.01% to 17.00%		3		$	31,821.70		0.00%		27		$	240,694.10		0.02%
17.01% to 18.00%		—		$	—		—%		5		$	45,352.86		0.00%
18.01% to 19.00%		—		$	—		—%		—		$	—		—%
Total		49,460		$	1,107,007,846.82		100.00%		69,471		$	1,119,773,433.38		100.00%

A-10

Distribution of the Initial Receivables Pool by State

The following tables set forth the percentage of the Aggregate Amount Financed in the states with the largest concentration of receivables for each of these pools. The following breakdown by state is based on the billing addresses of the obligors on the receivables:

AART 2013-2
State	Percentage of Aggregate Amount Financed
Texas	13.38%
Florida	7.05%
California	5.92%
Pennsylvania	5.40%
Michigan	4.83%
Illinois	4.64%

The AART 2013-2 pool of receivables includes receivables originated in all 50 states and the District of Columbia. No other state accounts for more than 3.78% of the Aggregate Amount Financed for the AART 2013-2 pool of receivables.

AART 2018-1
State	Percentage of Aggregate Amount Financed
Texas	13.50%
California	9.48%
Florida	9.28%
Pennsylvania	4.57%
Illinois	4.28%
Georgia	4.16%

The AART 2018-1 pool of receivables includes receivables originated in all 50 states and the District of Columbia. No other state accounts for more than 3.78% of the Aggregate Amount Financed for the AART 2018-1 pool of receivables.

Distribution of the Initial Receivables Pool by Vehicle Make

AART 2013-2
Vehicle Make	Percentage of Aggregate Amount Financed
Chevrolet	41.39%
GMC	15.79%
Jeep	6.33%
Ram	6.05%
Cadillac	5.37%
Dodge	5.16%
Buick	4.61%
Ford	3.59%
Chrysler	2.98%
Nissan	1.25%

No other make accounts for more than 1.21% of the Aggregate Amount Financed in the AART 2013-2 pool of receivables.

AART 2018-1
Vehicle Make	Percentage of Aggregate Amount Financed
Chevrolet	33.35%
GMC	9.42%
Ford	8.40%
Jeep	7.59%
Ram	6.02%
Nissan	4.20%
Dodge	4.08%
Kia	3.64%
Toyota	3.60%
Hyundai	3.28%

No other make accounts for more than 2.97% of the Aggregate Amount Financed in the AART 2018-1 pool of receivables.

A-11

Distribution of the Initial Receivables Pool by Vehicle Model

AART 2013-2
Vehicle Model	Percentage of Aggregate Amount Financed
C/K Pickup	13.52%
Ram Pickup	6.02%
Sierra	5.88%
Equinox	4.81%
Acadia	4.01%
Traverse	3.21%
Cruze	3.04%
Enclave	2.98%
Yukon	2.75%
Wrangler	2.74%

No other model accounts for more than 2.66% of the Aggregate Amount Financed in the AART 2013-2 pool of receivables.

AART 2018-1
Vehicle Model	Percentage of Aggregate Amount Financed
Silverado	11.31%
Sierra	4.63%
Ram Pickup	4.57%
Equinox	3.53%
Grand Cherokee	2.96%
Cruze	2.75%
Malibu	2.59%
Wrangler	2.18%
Express	1.93%
Traverse	1.80%

No other model accounts for more than 1.51% of the Aggregate Amount Financed in the AART 2018-1 pool of receivables.

A-12

ALLY AUTO RECEIVABLES TRUST 2014-1

Initial Aggregate Amount Financed: $2,048,927,617.40

		Net Loss Statistics
		Total for Month					Cumulative
Month	Prepayment Speeds	$		%			$		%
May-14	1.23		—		0.000000	%		—		0.000000	%
Jun-14	1.30		70,152.94		0.003424	%		70,152.94		0.003424	%
Jul-14	1.34		96,706.94		0.004720	%		166,859.88		0.008144	%
Aug-14	1.18		230,026.38		0.011227	%		396,886.26		0.019370	%
Sep-14	1.33		269,107.25		0.013134	%		665,993.51		0.032504	%
Oct-14	1.31		480,778.04		0.023465	%		1,146,771.55		0.055969	%
Nov-14	0.92		352,018.92		0.017181	%		1,498,790.47		0.073150	%
Dec-14	1.30		391,379.26		0.019102	%		1,890,169.73		0.092252	%
Jan-15	1.26		392,532.57		0.019158	%		2,282,702.30		0.111410	%
Feb-15	1.12		282,375.86		0.013782	%		2,565,078.16		0.125191	%
Mar-15	1.43		343,178.33		0.016749	%		2,908,256.49		0.141940	%
Apr-15	1.30		284,619.66		0.013891	%		3,192,876.15		0.155832	%
May-15	1.16		177,620.97		0.008669	%		3,370,497.12		0.164501	%
Jun-15	1.45		277,148.45		0.013527	%		3,647,645.57		0.178027	%
Jul-15	1.43		410,248.71		0.020023	%		4,057,894.28		0.198050	%
Aug-15	1.35		265,973.59		0.012981	%		4,323,867.87		0.211031	%
Sep-15	1.30		361,478.67		0.017642	%		4,685,346.54		0.228673	%
Oct-15	1.29		489,706.89		0.023901	%		5,175,053.43		0.252574	%
Nov-15	1.19		173,444.11		0.008465	%		5,348,497.54		0.261039	%
Dec-15	1.28		371,562.89		0.018135	%		5,720,060.43		0.279173	%
Jan-16	1.18		274,691.84		0.013407	%		5,994,752.27		0.292580	%
Feb-16	1.28		254,023.58		0.012398	%		6,248,775.85		0.304978	%
Mar-16	1.35		396,525.46		0.019353	%		6,645,301.31		0.324331	%
Apr-16	1.20		187,542.71		0.009153	%		6,832,844.02		0.333484	%
May-16	1.28		187,257.90		0.009139	%		7,020,101.92		0.342623	%
Jun-16	1.24		171,105.19		0.008351	%		7,191,207.11		0.350974	%
Jul-16	1.16		279,564.59		0.013644	%		7,470,771.70		0.364619	%
Aug-16	1.35		163,073.97		0.007959	%		7,633,845.67		0.372578	%
Sep-16	1.23		207,844.72		0.010144	%		7,841,690.39		0.382722	%
Oct-16	1.19		154,226.60		0.007527	%		7,995,916.99		0.390249	%
Nov-16	1.09		256,226.88		0.012505	%		8,252,143.87		0.402754	%
Dec-16	1.15		257,807.84		0.012583	%		8,509,951.71		0.415337	%
Jan-17	1.17		225,379.71		0.011000	%		8,735,331.42		0.426337	%
Feb-17	1.11		81,425.90		0.003974	%		8,816,757.32		0.430311	%
Mar-17	1.25		146,216.04		0.007136	%		8,962,973.36		0.437447	%
Apr-17	1.00		109,005.33		0.005320	%		9,071,978.69		0.442767	%
May-17	1.29		198,477.13		0.009687	%		9,270,455.82		0.452454	%
Jun-17	1.10		81,621.93		0.003984	%		9,352,077.75		0.456438	%
Jul-17	1.11		110,159.91		0.005376	%		9,462,237.66		0.461814	%
Aug-17	1.19		138,389.59		0.006754	%		9,600,627.25		0.468568	%
Sep-17	1.03		208,854.06		0.010193	%		9,809,481.31		0.478762	%
Oct-17	1.09		140,576.91		0.006861	%		9,950,058.22		0.485623	%
Nov-17	1.05		80,507.70		0.003929	%		10,030,565.92		0.489552	%

A-13

AART 2014-1: Delinquency Data

Month	Units							$								% 61+ days     delinquent
	31-60		61-90		91-120		121+	31-60		61-90		91-120		121+
May-14		361		1		1(1)	—		7,530,187.26		18,406.07		46,329.73		—		0.003266%
Jun-14		446		61		—	—		9,697,122.46		1,349,342.34		—		—		0.070485%
Jul-14		521		65		13	—		11,025,564.68		1,341,681.85		312,924.59		—		0.089609%
Aug-14		493		111		15	—		9,930,310.33		2,335,929.64		308,362.96		—		0.148195%
Sep-14		522		73		22	—		10,690,376.37		1,610,581.43		480,773.93		—		0.121646%
Oct-14		551		94		12	—		11,011,467.49		1,943,849.02		281,567.41		—		0.134411%
Nov-14		617		136		18	—		12,026,937.29		2,805,849.85		395,556.38		—		0.199717%
Dec-14		652		120		32	—		12,576,884.17		2,303,620.28		725,673.68		—		0.196498%
Jan-15		635		106		20	—		11,853,912.55		2,205,937.67		385,237.10		—		0.174736%
Feb-15		480		87		22	—		9,331,049.19		1,587,464.71		470,684.12		—		0.144058%
Mar-15		473		73		14	—		9,070,761.21		1,405,736.48		224,652.78		—		0.119257%
Apr-15		465		76		8	1		8,502,260.29		1,500,283.54		120,333.85		22,741.32		0.125371%
May-15		566		101		10	—		10,129,104.29		1,991,384.61		172,176.51		—		0.171858%
Jun-15		561		106		17	—		9,957,708.46		2,033,612.17		340,227.91		—		0.197625%
Jul-15		584		123		22	—		9,957,613.07		2,230,121.10		378,683.03		—		0.227754%
Aug-15		628		131		31	—		10,849,012.31		2,199,943.65		672,501.97		—		0.262766%
Sep-15		629		115		35	1		10,609,618.76		2,008,297.61		510,619.00		21,732.32		0.243492%
Oct-15		636		111		26	1		10,510,500.43		1,757,711.76		423,489.42		14,804.30		0.220683%
Nov-15		627		147		27	—		10,194,552.52		2,645,467.38		369,358.24		—		0.317253%
Dec-15		708		137		30	—		11,313,608.04		2,115,077.32		431,440.16		—		0.281517%
Jan-16		710		177		30	1		10,909,107.97		2,914,992.09		440,791.04		29,404.35		0.392600%
Feb-16		468		99		41	—		7,261,063.39		1,453,402.16		671,473.77		—		0.259498%
Mar-16		505		77		16	—		7,573,749.15		1,173,380.52		189,755.41		—		0.175918%
Apr-16		483		101		15	—		7,343,458.07		1,499,012.77		268,549.32		—		0.240297%
May-16		512		95		20	—		7,446,439.35		1,441,831.69		251,880.75		—		0.243444%
Jun-16		522		86		18	—		7,370,918.74		1,252,817.63		224,699.35		—		0.224518%
Jul-16		587		95		17	—		8,209,157.61		1,159,513.19		228,978.65		—		0.222915%
Aug-16		512		100		31	—		6,750,646.64		1,427,415.00		342,899.23		—		0.302454%
Sep-16		526		88		23	1		6,752,935.15		1,136,091.45		344,966.07		14,851.69		0.271373%
Oct-16		542		119		22	—		7,078,466.28		1,494,781.64		328,104.52		—		0.351232%
Nov-16		544		115		29	—		6,673,416.50		1,443,745.78		435,136.98		—		0.383865%
Dec-16		574		104		27	1		7,073,989.38		1,249,335.08		334,303.07		5,927.46		0.345594%
Jan-17		541		116		24	2		6,401,043.49		1,352,185.02		234,457.66		637.71		0.368161%
Feb-17		429		105		16	1		5,187,066.18		1,204,907.58		174,083.54		19,970.15		0.346113%
Mar-17		416		93		19	1		4,722,466.42		1,108,981.06		181,766.16		12,331.83		0.346450%
Apr-17		458		96		21	1		5,327,959.85		992,919.85		227,363.66		12,517.70		0.349641%
May-17		387		91		17	1		4,148,374.68		1,091,374.14		135,769.77		881.45		0.376590%
Jun-17		423		84		25	—		4,444,111.93		1,005,833.77		334,937.54		—		0.442084%
Jul-17		427		107		16	—		4,245,885.95		1,218,229.48		208,740.97		—		0.507464%
Aug-17		436		80		28	1		4,208,909.59		791,588.55		336,336.67		13,187.76		0.440264%
Sep-17		455		96		19	—		4,203,739.48		935,212.25		93,105.10		—		0.428824%
Oct-17		431		92		18	—		3,940,412.43		849,083.50		141,662.17		—		0.449097%
Nov-17		414		102		19	—		3,590,727.44		928,477.89		178,320.76		—		0.546063%

⁽¹⁾ Because the collections available for distribution on the initial distribution date (July 15, 2015) included amounts received during both the May 2015 and June 2015 Monthly Periods, the Servicer’s recordkeeping system cannot determine whether the receivable reported as being 91 days or more delinquent was more than 121 days delinquent at the end of the May 2015 Monthly Period. This receivable satisfied the eligibility criteria set forth in the related pooling agreement as of the applicable cutoff date, but certain payments received from the obligor for this receivable were reversed subsequent to the cutoff date.

A-14

Initial Receivables Pool Characteristics

	AART 2014-1		AART 2018-1
Weighted Average APR		3.94%		5.88%
Aggregate Amount Financed		$2,048,927,617.40	$	1,119,773,433.38
Number of Contracts in Pool		95,976		69,471
Average Amount Financed		$21,348.33	$	16,118.57
Weighted Average Original Maturity (in Months)		65.74		66.13
Weighted Average Remaining Maturity (in Months)		54.66		52.68
Percentage of Receivables with Original Maturities > 60 Months		63.57%		67.25%
Percentage of New Vehicles		73.91%		70.02%
Percentage of Non-Subvented Receivables		75.14%		97.50%
Weighted Average FICO Score		745.80		737.09
Weighted Average Loan-to-Value		95.82		94.21
Cutoff Date		May 1, 2014		January 1, 2018

Distribution of the Initial Receivables Pool by Annual Percentage Rate

	AART 2014-1							AART 2018-1
Annual Percentage Rate Range	Number of Contracts		Aggregate Amount Financed			Percentage of Aggregate Amount Financed		Number of Contracts		Aggregate Amount Financed			Percentage of Aggregate Amount Financed
0.00% to 1.00%		15,897		$	406,588,313.37		19.84%		2,188		$	24,002,778.51		2.14%
1.01% to 2.00%		2,985		$	57,343,992.91		2.80%		283		$	3,487,239.11		0.31%
2.01% to 3.00%		16,569		$	341,020,543.49		16.64%		8,161		$	142,123,125.14		12.69%
3.01% to 4.00%		16,900		$	366,775,687.18		17.90%		11,841		$	203,436,277.26		18.17%
4.01% to 5.00%		16,373		$	352,706,872.68		17.21%		10,786		$	174,599,348.76		15.59%
5.01% to 6.00%		10,697		$	211,994,082.25		10.35%		9,820		$	159,982,516.73		14.29%
6.01% to 7.00%		6,515		$	127,633,063.05		6.23%		7,670		$	126,850,724.30		11.33%
7.01% to 8.00%		5,014		$	92,345,291.03		4.51%		6,197		$	96,679,202.21		8.63%
8.01% to 9.00%		2,137		$	40,004,163.91		1.95%		4,461		$	70,886,858.80		6.33%
9.01% to 10.00%		1,302		$	24,173,996.49		1.18%		3,125		$	47,951,310.77		4.28%
10.01% to 11.00%		821		$	15,197,865.71		0.74%		2,133		$	32,280,059.54		2.88%
11.01% to 12.00%		432		$	7,829,305.37		0.38%		1,384		$	19,947,211.10		1.78%
12.01% to 13.00%		180		$	2,948,986.96		0.14%		758		$	9,879,786.59		0.88%
13.01% to 14.00%		86		$	1,263,448.02		0.06%		386		$	4,757,178.45		0.42%
14.01% to 15.00%		45		$	671,461.55		0.03%		179		$	1,962,216.15		0.18%
15.01% to 16.00%		17		$	306,614.50		0.01%		67		$	661,653.00		0.06%
16.01% to 17.00%		5		$	105,305.11		0.01%		27		$	240,694.10		0.02%
17.01% to 18.00%		1		$	18,623.82		0.00%		5		$	45,352.86		0.00%
18.01% to 19.00%		—		$	—		—%		—		$	—		—%
Total		95,976		$	2,048,927,617.40		100.00%		69,471		$	1,119,773,433.38		100.00%

A-15

Distribution of the Initial Receivables Pool by State

The following tables set forth the percentage of the Aggregate Amount Financed in the states with the largest concentration of receivables for each of these pools. The following breakdown by state is based on the billing addresses of the obligors on the receivables:

AART 2014-1
State	Percentage of Aggregate   Amount Financed
Texas		13.92%
Florida		7.16%
California		6.34%
Pennsylvania		4.98%
Illinois		4.56%
Michigan		4.40%

The AART 2014-1 pool of receivables includes receivables originated in all 50 states and the District of Columbia. No other state accounts for more than 3.73% of the Aggregate Amount Financed for the AART 2014-1 pool of receivables.

AART 2018-1
State	Percentage of Aggregate   Amount Financed
Texas		13.50%
California		9.48%
Florida		9.28%
Pennsylvania		4.57%
Illinois		4.28%
Georgia		4.16%

The AART 2018-1 pool of receivables includes receivables originated in all 50 states and the District of Columbia. No other state accounts for more than 3.78% of the Aggregate Amount Financed for the AART 2018-1 pool of receivables.

Distribution of the Initial Receivables Pool by Vehicle Make

AART 2014-1
Vehicle Make	Percentage of Aggregate   Amount Financed
Chevrolet		41.80%
GMC		15.49%
Jeep		5.83%
Ram		5.34%
Cadillac		5.08%
Dodge		4.78%
Buick		4.74%
Ford		4.36%
Chrysler		2.39%
Nissan		1.45%

No other make accounts for more than 1.35% of the Aggregate Amount Financed in the AART 2014-1 pool of receivables.

AART 2018-1
Vehicle Make	Percentage of Aggregate   Amount Financed
Chevrolet		33.35%
GMC		9.42%
Ford		8.40%
Jeep		7.59%
Ram		6.02%
Nissan		4.20%
Dodge		4.08%
Kia		3.64%
Toyota		3.60%
Hyundai		3.28%

No other make accounts for more than 2.97% of the Aggregate Amount Financed in the AART 2018-1 pool of receivables.

A-16

Distribution of the Initial Receivables Pool by Vehicle Model

AART 2014-1
Vehicle Model	Percentage of Aggregate     Amount Financed
C/K Pickup		14.41%
Sierra		6.16%
Ram Pickup		5.28%
Equinox		4.27%
Acadia		3.81%
Traverse		3.22%
Tahoe		2.99%
Yukon		2.81%
Enclave		2.81%
Cruze		2.80%

No other model accounts for more than 2.32% of the Aggregate Amount Financed in the AART 2014-1 pool of receivables.

AART 2018-1
Vehicle Model	Percentage of Aggregate     Amount Financed
Silverado		11.31%
Sierra		4.63%
Ram Pickup		4.57%
Equinox		3.53%
Grand Cherokee		2.96%
Cruze		2.75%
Malibu		2.59%
Wrangler		2.18%
Express		1.93%
Traverse		1.80%

No other model accounts for more than 1.51% of the Aggregate Amount Financed in the AART 2018-1 pool of receivables.

A-17

ALLY AUTO RECEIVABLES TRUST 2014-2

Initial Aggregate Amount Financed: $1,530,928,680.86

	Prepayment Speeds	Net Loss Statistics
		Total for Month				Cumulative
Month		$		%		$		%
Sep-14	1.24		25,631.77		0.001674%		25,631.77		0.001674%
Oct-14	1.24		59,791.49		0.003906%		85,423.26		0.005580%
Nov-14	0.84		140,634.66		0.009186%		226,057.92		0.014766%
Dec-14	1.23		154,641.78		0.010101%		380,699.70		0.024867%
Jan-15	1.13		103,788.64		0.006779%		484,488.34		0.031647%
Feb-15	1.03		305,172.10		0.019934%		789,660.44		0.051580%
Mar-15	1.39		279,919.81		0.018284%		1,069,580.25		0.069865%
Apr-15	1.17		164,086.02		0.010718%		1,233,666.27		0.080583%
May-15	1.18		154,053.68		0.010063%		1,387,719.95		0.090646%
Jun-15	1.34		157,084.53		0.010261%		1,544,804.48		0.100906%
Jul-15	1.36		264,729.40		0.017292%		1,809,533.88		0.118198%
Aug-15	1.29		171,697.83		0.011215%		1,981,231.71		0.129414%
Sep-15	1.26		105,351.47		0.006882%		2,086,583.18		0.136295%
Oct-15	1.25		300,914.09		0.019656%		2,387,497.27		0.155951%
Nov-15	1.14		227,233.00		0.014843%		2,614,730.27		0.170794%
Dec-15	1.27		187,847.40		0.012270%		2,802,577.67		0.183064%
Jan-16	1.09		122,158.00		0.007979%		2,924,735.67		0.191043%
Feb-16	1.27		171,006.85		0.011170%		3,095,742.52		0.202213%
Mar-16	1.35		240,249.54		0.015693%		3,335,992.06		0.217906%
Apr-16	1.15		132,487.77		0.008654%		3,468,479.83		0.226561%
May-16	1.31		194,830.39		0.012726%		3,663,310.22		0.239287%
Jun-16	1.28		192,248.34		0.012558%		3,855,558.56		0.251844%
Jul-16	1.19		187,136.67		0.012224%		4,042,695.23		0.264068%
Aug-16	1.33		185,259.15		0.012101%		4,227,954.38		0.276169%
Sep-16	1.30		170,847.14		0.011160%		4,398,801.52		0.287329%
Oct-16	1.18		211,743.73		0.013831%		4,610,545.25		0.301160%
Nov-16	1.14		225,776.15		0.014748%		4,836,321.40		0.315908%
Dec-16	1.17		209,426.32		0.013680%		5,045,747.72		0.329587%
Jan-17	1.20		190,001.63		0.012411%		5,235,749.35		0.341998%
Feb-17	1.12		111,720.02		0.007298%		5,347,469.37		0.349296%
Mar-17	1.29		164,808.48		0.010765%		5,512,277.85		0.360061%
Apr-17	1.10		123,152.20		0.008044%		5,635,430.05		0.368105%
May-17	1.27		143,564.09		0.009378%		5,778,994.14		0.377483%
Jun-17	1.16		104,468.36		0.006824%		5,883,462.50		0.384307%
Jul-17	1.15		84,445.08		0.005516%		5,967,907.58		0.389823%
Aug-17	1.23		124,603.71		0.008139%		6,092,511.29		0.397962%
Sep-17	1.08		125,072.54		0.008170%		6,217,583.83		0.406132%
Oct-17	1.15		186,585.01		0.012188%		6,404,168.84		0.418319%
Nov-17	1.09		99,215.30		0.006481%		6,503,384.14		0.424800%

A-18

AART 2014-2: Delinquency Data

	Units								$								% 61+ days delinquent
Month	31-60		61-90		91-120		121+		31-60		61-90		91-120		121+
Sep-14		252		—		—		—		5,039,661.82		—		—		—		0.000000	%
Oct-14		267		37		2		—		5,184,750.63		898,383.88		34,548.58		—		0.065118	%
Nov-14		364		47		11		—		7,289,354.81		1,080,696.08		251,561.47		—		0.095388	%
Dec-14		357		59		11		—		6,655,028.59		1,314,183.61		271,514.08		—		0.117381	%
Jan-15		340		66		13		—		6,608,180.48		1,336,023.04		369,262.92		—		0.130386	%
Feb-15		263		48		6		—		5,044,237.37		1,110,131.27		103,457.52		—		0.095762	%
Mar-15		281		39		7		—		5,212,615.27		922,339.47		126,824.74		—		0.085973	%
Apr-15		271		35		5		—		4,917,157.50		714,074.77		148,185.11		—		0.073144	%
May-15		376		46		8		—		6,636,624.64		700,162.49		152,877.99		—		0.074968	%
Jun-15		362		71		11		1		6,439,290.08		1,379,323.80		182,330.09		18,085.09		0.144272	%
Jul-15		383		73		15		—		6,831,543.73		1,257,298.76		253,869.67		—		0.143571	%
Aug-15		423		78		14		—		7,358,008.83		1,430,597.07		150,565.47		—		0.156192	%
Sep-15		468		73		18		—		7,839,978.75		1,303,029.09		320,530.60		—		0.166770	%
Oct-15		451		85		14		—		7,809,210.67		1,441,266.94		182,458.87		—		0.173561	%
Nov-15		443		94		19		—		7,144,090.92		1,727,440.57		411,160.81		—		0.237530	%
Dec-15		445		89		24		—		7,186,668.19		1,490,515.66		563,031.79		—		0.237815	%
Jan-16		458		89		14		—		7,212,329.25		1,570,598.52		284,895.79		—		0.223408	%
Feb-16		333		63		15		—		5,247,216.54		1,142,686.52		274,779.42		—		0.178234	%
Mar-16		328		54		16		—		5,128,304.13		963,906.24		219,579.52		—		0.155850	%
Apr-16		344		64		13		—		5,303,214.12		907,164.38		183,996.00		—		0.149921	%
May-16		338		69		10		—		5,131,106.49		1,041,426.84		161,884.00		—		0.173312	%
Jun-16		377		59		11		—		5,831,849.70		928,453.54		164,610.15		—		0.165076	%
Jul-16		382		68		16		—		5,748,850.84		1,070,096.63		172,737.77		—		0.196608	%
Aug-16		379		88		13		—		5,585,529.71		1,405,846.80		226,511.71		—		0.271707	%
Sep-16		372		82		13		—		5,320,794.27		1,265,379.73		195,045.16		—		0.255921	%
Oct-16		393		75		20		—		5,789,769.80		1,033,101.81		290,907.72		—		0.243797	%
Nov-16		411		91		22		—		5,649,553.97		1,272,369.40		227,176.40		—		0.290189	%
Dec-16		432		80		23		—		5,789,696.45		999,598.40		383,235.50		—		0.281823	%
Jan-17		398		89		13		3		5,161,954.55		1,222,081.55		199,897.62		1,974.93		0.306287	%
Feb-17		374		61		20		—		4,948,680.99		846,972.88		320,626.95		—		0.264802	%
Mar-17		336		74		9		—		4,250,528.35		1,040,277.04		119,485.83		—		0.279335	%
Apr-17		336		72		19		—		4,249,955.96		955,899.89		157,828.98		—		0.283485	%
May-17		347		55		13		—		4,357,326.03		714,003.38		77,741.59		—		0.214566	%
Jun-17		356		52		13		—		4,181,442.03		623,841.46		133,087.30		—		0.217819	%
Jul-17		351		82		13		—		3,825,020.02		936,799.23		109,326.83		—		0.320153	%
Aug-17		320		85		32		—		3,479,789.23		881,116.86		330,934.01		—		0.396519	%
Sep-17		352		59		38		2		3,904,533.71		612,914.52		376,792.30		8,274.61		0.347761	%
Oct-17		330		72		14		1		3,119,903.04		807,502.73		158,628.62		398.88		0.360455	%
Nov-17		328		67		13		—		3,201,221.18		634,883.00		198,055.03		—		0.332445	%

A-19

Initial Receivables Pool Characteristics

	AART 2014-2		AART 2018-1
Weighted Average APR		4.13%		5.88%
Aggregate Amount Financed		$1,530,928,680.86	$	1,119,773,433.38
Number of Contracts in Pool		70,196		69,471
Average Amount Financed		$21,809.34	$	16,118.57
Weighted Average Original Maturity (in Months)		66.94		66.13
Weighted Average Remaining Maturity (in Months)		58.01		52.68
Percentage of Receivables with Original Maturities > 60 Months		70.31%		67.25%
Percentage of New Vehicles		66.61%		70.02%
Percentage of Non-Subvented Receivables		86.82%		97.50%
Weighted Average FICO Score		749.64		737.09
Weighted Average Loan-to-Value		97.75		94.21
Cutoff Date		September 1, 2014		January 1, 2018

Distribution of the Initial Receivables Pool by Annual Percentage Rate

Annual Percentage         Rate Range	AART 2014-2						AART 2018-1
	Number of  Contracts		Aggregate Amount Financed		Percentage of  Aggregate Amount   Financed		Number of Contracts		Aggregate Amount Financed		Percentage of  Aggregate Amount Financed
0.00% to 1.00%		6,118	$	167,799,237.67		10.96%		2,188	$	24,002,778.51		2.14%
1.01% to 2.00%		940	$	17,143,445.20		1.12%		283	$	3,487,239.11		0.31%
2.01% to 3.00%		11,674	$	288,394,257.44		18.84%		8,161	$	142,123,125.14		12.69%
3.01% to 4.00%		16,160	$	368,536,042.62		24.07%		11,841	$	203,436,277.26		18.17%
4.01% to 5.00%		14,698	$	316,205,653.31		20.65%		10,786	$	174,599,348.76		15.59%
5.01% to 6.00%		7,111	$	138,394,179.46		9.04%		9,820	$	159,982,516.73		14.29%
6.01% to 7.00%		4,959	$	96,395,714.98		6.30%		7,670	$	126,850,724.30		11.33%
7.01% to 8.00%		5,266	$	90,798,584.86		5.93%		6,197	$	96,679,202.21		8.63%
8.01% to 9.00%		2,290	$	35,749,445.13		2.34%		4,461	$	70,886,858.80		6.33%
9.01% to 10.00%		803	$	9,887,919.55		0.65%		3,125	$	47,951,310.77		4.28%
10.01% to 11.00%		159	$	1,455,159.28		0.10%		2,133	$	32,280,059.54		2.88%
11.01% to 12.00%		14	$	138,586.91		0.01%		1,384	$	19,947,211.10		1.78%
12.01% to 13.00%		4	$	30,454.45		0.00%		758	$	9,879,786.59		0.88%
13.01% to 14.00%		—	$	—		—%		386	$	4,757,178.45		0.42%
14.01% to 15.00%		—	$	—		—%		179	$	1,962,216.15		0.18%
15.01% to 16.00%		—	$	—		—%		67	$	661,653.00		0.06%
16.01% to 17.00%		—	$	—		—%		27	$	240,694.10		0.02%
17.01% to 18.00%		—	$	—		—%		5	$	45,352.86		0.00%
18.01% to 19.00%		—	$	—		—%		—	$	—		—%
Total		70,196	$	1,530,928,680.86		100.00%		69,471	$	1,119,773,433.38		100.00%

A-20

Distribution of the Receivables Pool by State

The following tables set forth the percentage of the Aggregate Amount Financed in the states with the largest concentration of receivables for each of these pools. The following breakdown by state is based on the billing addresses of the obligors on the receivables:

AART 2014-2
State	Percentage of Aggregate   Amount Financed
Texas	13.50%
Florida	7.57%
California	6.39%
Pennsylvania	6.06%
Illinois	4.52%
Michigan	4.40%

The AART 2014-2 pool of receivables includes receivables originated in all 50 states and the District of Columbia. No other state accounts for more than 4.03% of the Aggregate Amount Financed for the AART 2014-2 pool of receivables.

AART 2018-1
State	Percentage of Aggregate  Amount Financed
Texas	13.50%
California	9.48%
Florida	9.28%
Pennsylvania	4.57%
Illinois	4.28%
Georgia	4.16%

The AART 2018-1 pool of receivables includes receivables originated in all 50 states and the District of Columbia. No other state accounts for more than 3.78% of the Aggregate Amount Financed for the AART 2018-1 pool of receivables.

Distribution of the Receivables Pool by Vehicle Make

AART 2014-2
Vehicle Make	Percentage of Aggregate   Amount Financed
Chevrolet	40.97%
GMC	15.09%
Jeep	5.95%
Ram	5.20%
Ford	5.18%
Buick	4.63%
Dodge	4.61%
Cadillac	4.30%
Chrysler	2.07%
Nissan	1.78%

No other make accounts for more than 1.54% of the Aggregate Amount Financed in the AART 2014-2 pool of receivables.

AART 2018-1
Vehicle Make	Percentage of Aggregate  Amount Financed
Chevrolet	33.35%
GMC	9.42%
Ford	8.40%
Jeep	7.59%
Ram	6.02%
Nissan	4.20%
Dodge	4.08%
Kia	3.64%
Toyota	3.60%
Hyundai	3.28%

No other make accounts for more than 2.97% of the Aggregate Amount Financed in the AART 2018-1 pool of receivables.

A-21

Distribution of the Receivables Pool by Vehicle Model

AART 2014-2
Vehicle Model	Percentage of Aggregate     Amount Financed
C/K Pickup	15.37%
Sierra	6.64%
Ram Pickup	4.91%
Equinox	3.69%
Acadia	3.12%
Yukon	3.11%
Tahoe	3.02%
Traverse	2.82%
Cruze	2.42%
Wrangler	2.39%

No other model accounts for more than 2.31% of the Aggregate Amount Financed in the AART 2014-2 pool of receivables.

AART 2018-1
Vehicle Model	Percentage of Aggregate  Amount Financed
Silverado	11.31%
Sierra	4.63%
Ram Pickup	4.57%
Equinox	3.53%
Grand Cherokee	2.96%
Cruze	2.75%
Malibu	2.59%
Wrangler	2.18%
Express	1.93%
Traverse	1.80%

No other model accounts for more than 1.51% of the Aggregate Amount Financed in the AART 2018-1 pool of receivables.

A-22

ALLY AUTO RECEIVABLES TRUST 2014-3

Initial Aggregate Amount Financed: $1,025,037,244.33

	Prepayment Speeds		Net Loss Statistics
			Total for Month				Cumulative
Month			$		%		$		%
Dec-14		1.14		—		0.000000%		—		0.000000%
Jan-15		1.03		24,919.06		0.002431%		24,919.06		0.002431%
Feb-15		0.96		23,126.76		0.002256%		48,045.82		0.004687%
Mar-15		1.35		178,387.40		0.017403%		226,433.22		0.022090%
Apr-15		1.26		167,194.23		0.016311%		393,627.45		0.038401%
May-15		1.08		127,667.79		0.012455%		521,295.24		0.050856%
Jun-15		1.45		159,421.32		0.015553%		680,716.56		0.066409%
Jul-15		1.34		256,218.08		0.024996%		936,934.64		0.091405%
Aug-15		1.27		304,658.42		0.029722%		1,241,593.06		0.121127%
Sep-15		1.39		93,188.51		0.009091%		1,334,781.57		0.130218%
Oct-15		1.29		351,934.46		0.034334%		1,686,716.03		0.164552%
Nov-15		1.23		293,967.66		0.028679%		1,980,683.69		0.193230%
Dec-15		1.34		221,629.35		0.021622%		2,202,313.04		0.214852%
Jan-16		1.18		276,101.08		0.026936%		2,478,414.12		0.241788%
Feb-16		1.38		322,128.65		0.031426%		2,800,542.77		0.273214%
Mar-16		1.33		46,823.14		0.004568%		2,847,365.91		0.277782%
Apr-16		1.23		188,947.87		0.018433%		3,036,313.78		0.296215%
May-16		1.35		200,530.94		0.019563%		3,236,844.72		0.315778%
Jun-16		1.35		167,656.05		0.016356%		3,404,500.77		0.332134%
Jul-16		1.30		175,849.65		0.017155%		3,580,350.42		0.349290%
Aug-16		1.40		214,481.45		0.020924%		3,794,831.87		0.370214%
Sep-16		1.28		291,003.58		0.028390%		4,085,835.45		0.398604%
Oct-16		1.17		100,083.22		0.009764%		4,185,918.67		0.408367%
Nov-16		1.21		149,625.33		0.014597%		4,335,544.00		0.422965%
Dec-16		1.18		154,207.07		0.015044%		4,489,751.07		0.438009%
Jan-17		1.18		108,327.56		0.010568%		4,598,078.63		0.448577%
Feb-17		1.15		122,832.88		0.011983%		4,720,911.51		0.460560%
Mar-17		1.33		236,890.87		0.023110%		4,957,802.38		0.483670%
Apr-17		1.05		121,513.95		0.011855%		5,079,316.33		0.495525%
May-17		1.22		145,409.58		0.014186%		5,224,725.91		0.509711%
Jun-17		1.19		125,190.62		0.012213%		5,349,916.53		0.521924%
Jul-17		1.16		104,010.97		0.010147%		5,453,927.50		0.532071%
Aug-17		1.20		122,116.92		0.011913%		5,576,044.42		0.543985%
Sep-17		1.12		192,263.32		0.018757%		5,768,307.74		0.562741%
Oct-17		1.22		74,284.48		0.007247%		5,842,592.22		0.569988%
Nov-17		1.09		20,816.68		0.002031%		5,863,408.90		0.572019%

A-23

AART 2014-3: Delinquency Data

Month	Units								$								% 61+ days delinquent
	31-60		61-90		91-120		121+		31-60		61-90		91-120		121+
Dec-14		171		1		—		—		3,905,717.00		12,910.97		—		—		0.001298%
Jan-15		185		33		2		—		4,166,214.35		804,168.42		49,067.54		—		0.088356%
Feb-15		147		21		6		—		3,298,846.75		495,346.13		148,223.60		—		0.068596%
Mar-15		173		14		2		—		4,102,775.37		320,059.74		42,563.20		—		0.040032%
Apr-15		175		26		3		—		3,684,766.77		639,116.27		86,100.39		—		0.082828%
May-15		215		38		11		—		4,735,841.67		846,484.57		290,233.71		—		0.134079%
Jun-15		201		40		10		—		4,525,738.85		936,462.37		173,129.95		—		0.135978%
Jul-15		205		47		5		—		4,220,611.89		1,146,926.25		55,998.53		—		0.153028%
Aug-15		253		36		8		—		4,972,452.17		797,795.93		168,332.09		—		0.127500%
Sep-15		268		51		7		—		5,412,996.38		1,073,316.06		132,167.14		—		0.165481%
Oct-15		290		48		12		—		5,604,352.29		1,012,881.67		252,744.53		—		0.180556%
Nov-15		309		77		8		—		5,985,751.11		1,337,547.54		130,705.96		—		0.217581%
Dec-15		321		67		23		—		5,913,686.39		1,343,150.62		343,795.95		—		0.260419%
Jan-16		319		69		12		—		6,119,780.02		1,180,456.21		214,369.60		—		0.223792%
Feb-16		242		39		11		—		4,569,180.94		778,170.18		153,942.97		—		0.156155%
Mar-16		243		48		5		—		4,595,948.35		873,071.11		93,572.25		—		0.169124%
Apr-16		234		43		10		—		4,626,236.44		817,856.77		133,478.20		—		0.173586%
May-16		267		53		9		—		5,014,540.59		1,028,050.77		152,325.80		—		0.225422%
Jun-16		255		71		11		—		4,682,166.85		1,277,797.11		168,531.98		—		0.289324%
Jul-16		290		62		19		1		4,994,767.75		1,145,291.17		313,387.50		19,380.46		0.309702%
Aug-16		257		65		16		1		4,308,203.82		1,088,666.95		238,570.82		9,277.28		0.294400%
Sep-16		274		50		18		—		4,715,342.86		791,785.68		301,700.19		—		0.252713%
Oct-16		271		61		14		—		4,536,963.71		1,123,210.61		212,238.79		—		0.323316%
Nov-16		303		65		14		1		4,789,496.88		992,749.97		227,985.13		14,607.71		0.313929%
Dec-16		330		64		18		1		4,899,415.01		1,017,157.85		287,410.26		14,607.71		0.352035%
Jan-17		308		59		7		2		4,800,586.92		813,769.04		89,792.52		15,403.71		0.257808%
Feb-17		260		57		12		—		4,009,509.78		821,056.18		119,847.30		—		0.277689%
Mar-17		257		44		15		—		3,858,506.72		561,122.67		186,118.19		—		0.233600%
Apr-17		259		62		9		—		3,912,664.46		968,241.05		54,966.70		—		0.336545%
May-17		264		54		17		—		3,754,701.36		764,640.49		203,237.87		—		0.337011%
Jun-17		264		33		12		—		3,644,006.75		496,622.58		157,669.75		—		0.241329%
Jul-17		270		64		7		—		3,536,014.59		858,227.41		108,596.32		—		0.377993%
Aug-17		263		56		19		—		3,344,196.43		812,364.41		212,521.94		—		0.426041%
Sep-17		321		51		14		—		4,000,072.54		666,766.97		185,327.07		—		0.376231%
Oct-17		315		54		13		—		3,846,914.75		623,369.19		151,594.30		—		0.365449%
Nov-17		339		59		15		—		4,101,374.41		641,025.87		172,432.91		—		0.408688%

A-24

Initial Receivables Pool Characteristics

	AART 2014-3		AART 2018-1
Weighted Average APR		3.87%		5.88%
Aggregate Amount Financed		$1,025,037,244.33	$	1,119,773,433.38
Number of Contracts in Pool		45,620		69,471
Average Amount Financed		$22,469.03	$	16,118.57
Weighted Average Original Maturity (in Months)		66.65		66.13
Weighted Average Remaining Maturity (in Months)		57.59		52.68
Percentage of Receivables with Original Maturities > 60 Months		68.69%		67.25%
Percentage of New Vehicles		70.20%		70.02%
Percentage of Non-Subvented Receivables		76.33%		97.50%
Weighted Average FICO Score		741.39		737.09
Weighted Average Loan-to-Value		97.37		94.21
Cutoff Date		December 1, 2014		January 1, 2018

Distribution of the Initial Receivables Pool by Annual Percentage Rate

Annual Percentage Rate Range	AART 2014-3						AART 2018-1
	Number of Contracts		Aggregate Amount Financed		Percentage of Aggregate Amount Financed		Number of Contracts		Aggregate Amount Financed		Percentage of Aggregate Amount Financed
0.00% to 1.00%		7,217	$	203,227,627.52		19.83%		2,188	$	24,002,778.51		2.14%
1.01% to 2.00%		1,016	$	23,751,604.10		2.32%		283	$	3,487,239.11		0.31%
2.01% to 3.00%		8,054	$	169,271,813.03		16.51%		8,161	$	142,123,125.14		12.69%
3.01% to 4.00%		7,632	$	172,688,198.02		16.85%		11,841	$	203,436,277.26		18.17%
4.01% to 5.00%		8,030	$	175,386,440.44		17.11%		10,786	$	174,599,348.76		15.59%
5.01% to 6.00%		5,565	$	116,436,096.95		11.36%		9,820	$	159,982,516.73		14.29%
6.01% to 7.00%		3,647	$	75,426,820.71		7.36%		7,670	$	126,850,724.30		11.33%
7.01% to 8.00%		2,186	$	44,397,264.01		4.33%		6,197	$	96,679,202.21		8.63%
8.01% to 9.00%		1,024	$	20,762,875.77		2.03%		4,461	$	70,886,858.80		6.33%
9.01% to 10.00%		602	$	11,872,164.53		1.16%		3,125	$	47,951,310.77		4.28%
10.01% to 11.00%		386	$	7,607,783.68		0.74%		2,133	$	32,280,059.54		2.88%
11.01% to 12.00%		182	$	3,116,714.17		0.30%		1,384	$	19,947,211.10		1.78%
12.01% to 13.00%		66	$	962,404.46		0.09%		758	$	9,879,786.59		0.88%
13.01% to 14.00%		12	$	122,137.64		0.01%		386	$	4,757,178.45		0.42%
14.01% to 15.00%		1	$	7,299.30		0.00%		179	$	1,962,216.15		0.18%
15.01% to 16.00%		—	$	—		—%		67	$	661,653.00		0.06%
16.01% to 17.00%		—	$	—		—%		27	$	240,694.10		0.02%
17.01% to 18.00%		—	$	—		—%		5	$	45,352.86		0.00%
18.01% to 19.00%		—	$	—		—%		—	$	—		—%
Total		45,620	$	1,025,037,244.33		100.00%		69,471	$	1,119,773,433.38		100.00%

A-25

Distribution of the Receivables Pool by State

The following tables set forth the percentage of the Aggregate Amount Financed in the states with the largest concentration of receivables for each of these pools. The following breakdown by state is based on the billing addresses of the obligors on the receivables:

AART 2014-3
State	Percentage of Aggregate     Amount Financed
Texas		14.22%
California		7.25%
Florida		7.15%
Pennsylvania		4.94%
Illinois		4.82%
Michigan		4.42%

The AART 2014-3 pool of receivables includes receivables originated in all 50 states and the District of Columbia. No other state accounts for more than 3.57% of the Aggregate Amount Financed for the AART 2014-3 pool of receivables.

AART 2018-1
State	Percentage of Aggregate   Amount Financed
Texas		13.50	%
California		9.48	%
Florida		9.28	%
Pennsylvania		4.57	%
Illinois		4.28	%
Georgia		4.16	%

The AART 2018-1 pool of receivables includes receivables originated in all 50 states and the District of Columbia. No other state accounts for more than 3.78% of the Aggregate Amount Financed for the AART 2018-1 pool of receivables.

Distribution of the Receivables Pool by Vehicle Make

AART 2014-3
Vehicle Make	Percentage of Aggregate     Amount Financed
Chevrolet		42.76%
GMC		13.94%
Buick		5.46%
Jeep		5.31%
Ford		5.28%
Ram		4.71%
Cadillac		4.28%
Dodge		4.09%
Chrysler		1.83%
Nissan		1.83%

No other make accounts for more than 1.57% of the Aggregate Amount Financed in the AART 2014-3 pool of receivables.

AART 2018-1
Vehicle Make	Percentage of Aggregate   Amount Financed
Chevrolet		33.35%
GMC		9.42%
Ford		8.40%
Jeep		7.59%
Ram		6.02%
Nissan		4.20%
Dodge		4.08%
Kia		3.64%
Toyota		3.60%
Hyundai		3.28%

No other make accounts for more than 2.97% of the Aggregate Amount Financed in the AART 2018-1 pool of receivables.

A-26

Distribution of the Receivables Pool by Vehicle Model

AART 2014-3
Vehicle Model	Percentage of Aggregate     Amount Financed
Silverado		15.90%
Sierra		6.13%
Ram Pickup		4.38%
Equinox		3.86%
Cruze		3.18%
Acadia		3.10%
Traverse		3.04%
Tahoe		2.73%
Yukon		2.69%
Camaro		2.37%

No other model accounts for more than 2.37% of the Aggregate Amount Financed in the AART 2014-3 pool of receivables.

AART 2018-1
Vehicle Model	Percentage of Aggregate   Amount Financed
Silverado		11.31%
Sierra		4.63%
Ram Pickup		4.57%
Equinox		3.53%
Grand Cherokee		2.96%
Cruze		2.75%
Malibu		2.59%
Wrangler		2.18%
Express		1.93%
Traverse		1.80%

No other model accounts for more than 1.51% of the Aggregate Amount Financed in the AART 2018-1 pool of receivables.

A-27

ALLY AUTO RECEIVABLES TRUST 2015-1

Initial Aggregate Amount Financed: $1,035,896,144.85

		Net Loss Statistics
		Total for Month				Cumulative
Month	Prepayment Speeds	$		%		$		%
Jul-15	1.33		—		0.000000%		—		0.000000%
Aug-15	1.26		45,725.79		0.004414%		45,725.79		0.004414%
Sep-15	1.26		17,820.50		0.001720%		63,546.29		0.006134%
Oct-15	1.24		107,207.73		0.010349%		170,754.02		0.016484%
Nov-15	1.15		187,717.06		0.018121%		358,471.08		0.034605%
Dec-15	1.19		55,834.27		0.005390%		414,305.35		0.039995%
Jan-16	1.08		171,251.08		0.016532%		585,556.43		0.056527%
Feb-16	1.26		212,869.39		0.020549%		798,425.82		0.077076%
Mar-16	1.33		99,268.90		0.009583%		897,694.72		0.086659%
Apr-16	1.25		100,132.89		0.009666%		997,827.61		0.096325%
May-16	1.30		155,976.10		0.015057%		1,153,803.71		0.111382%
Jun-16	1.30		83,556.40		0.008066%		1,237,360.11		0.119448%
Jul-16	1.20		144,044.77		0.013905%		1,381,404.88		0.133354%
Aug-16	1.40		117,981.24		0.011389%		1,499,386.12		0.144743%
Sep-16	1.24		66,734.07		0.006442%		1,566,120.19		0.151185%
Oct-16	1.21		167,069.58		0.016128%		1,733,189.77		0.167313%
Nov-16	1.10		171,885.38		0.016593%		1,905,075.15		0.183906%
Dec-16	1.17		159,205.71		0.015369%		2,064,280.86		0.199275%
Jan-17	1.24		187,527.07		0.018103%		2,251,807.93		0.217378%
Feb-17	1.12		181,448.15		0.017516%		2,433,256.08		0.234894%
Mar-17	1.37		235,001.57		0.022686%		2,668,257.65		0.257580%
Apr-17	1.06		94,367.43		0.009110%		2,762,625.08		0.266689%
May-17	1.22		173,228.93		0.016723%		2,935,854.01		0.283412%
Jun-17	1.19		85,199.52		0.008225%		3,021,053.53		0.291637%
Jul-17	1.20		81,444.90		0.007862%		3,102,498.43		0.299499%
Aug-17	1.25		95,351.34		0.009205%		3,197,849.77		0.308704%
Sep-17	1.08		67,964.12		0.006561%		3,265,813.89		0.315265%
Oct-17	1.21		154,148.39		0.014881%		3,419,962.28		0.330145%
Nov-17	1.10		135,702.72		0.013100%		3,555,665.00		0.343245%

A-28

AART 2015-1: Delinquency Data

Month	Units								$								% 61+ days delinquent
	31-60		61-90		91-120		121+		31-60		61-90		91-120		121+
Jul-15		166		2		—		—		3,399,461.47		18,344.58		—		—		0.001835%
Aug-15		207		26		2		—		4,392,648.26		505,099.00		65,708.59		—		0.059144%
Sep-15		237		31		6		—		5,065,143.61		611,482.30		91,096.74		—		0.075449%
Oct-15		219		34		10		—		4,261,788.37		792,514.14		185,695.43		—		0.108930%
Nov-15		229		41		5		—		4,311,670.07		849,244.71		78,659.66		—		0.107056%
Dec-15		296		51		8		1		5,591,043.77		872,123.45		222,172.89		18,251.90		0.133186%
Jan-16		288		56		11		—		5,508,479.16		1,219,063.91		219,083.46		—		0.178408%
Feb-16		206		47		4		—		3,890,785.71		864,696.26		114,643.84		—		0.126365%
Mar-16		189		31		9		—		3,744,009.17		503,100.98		135,870.14		—		0.085955%
Apr-16		214		41		5		1		4,091,376.62		762,632.98		76,444.24		3,162.92		0.118031%
May-16		213		39		9		—		3,836,189.81		833,819.25		147,430.14		—		0.143522%
Jun-16		193		51		12		1		3,387,302.06		940,842.87		233,245.28		24,289.09		0.183097%
Jul-16		241		42		16		—		4,092,356.34		770,971.72		270,697.28		—		0.166094%
Aug-16		256		43		9		—		4,403,054.02		594,807.78		151,106.52		—		0.124758%
Sep-16		248		55		8		—		3,971,240.44		819,820.08		70,996.12		—		0.155883%
Oct-16		289		52		14		—		4,634,962.12		792,280.70		188,459.25		—		0.179640%
Nov-16		295		57		16		—		5,045,488.19		785,643.51		196,472.57		—		0.187999%
Dec-16		322		75		15		1		5,005,564.42		1,322,294.35		134,829.43		9,813.79		0.294281%
Jan-17		278		55		20		1		3,980,856.85		849,028.20		406,862.45		167.02		0.264738%
Feb-17		246		50		10		—		3,535,887.44		646,163.35		115,682.74		—		0.168434%
Mar-17		236		37		16		—		3,501,791.56		578,354.58		102,386.83		—		0.159179%
Apr-17		233		50		13		—		3,163,557.52		652,781.10		154,127.03		—		0.198087%
May-17		246		53		9		—		3,451,853.56		733,400.75		74,389.88		—		0.209372%
Jun-17		259		48		10		1		3,526,672.79		645,969.34		125,479.06		17.90		0.211248%
Jul-17		266		52		10		—		3,550,285.69		659,766.86		152,462.80		—		0.235412%
Aug-17		265		62		13		—		3,414,024.63		823,543.55		142,885.10		—		0.297332%
Sep-17		289		59		22		—		3,314,959.31		756,182.68		227,506.73		—		0.320100%
Oct-17		287		75		16		2		3,440,083.74		911,772.39		199,462.12		6,646.83		0.386983%
Nov-17		269		61		19		—		3,059,462.12		650,544.38		240,197.03		—		0.327447%

A-29

Initial Receivables Pool Characteristics

	AART 2015-1		AART 2018-1
Weighted Average APR		3.80%		5.88%
Aggregate Amount Financed	$	1,035,896,144.85	$	1,119,773,433.38
Number of Contracts in Pool		52,991		69,471
Average Amount Financed		$19,548.53	$	16,118.57
Weighted Average Original Maturity (in Months)		66.19		66.13
Weighted Average Remaining Maturity (in Months)		52.96		52.68
Percentage of Receivables with Original Maturities > 60 Months		66.35%		67.25%
Percentage of New Vehicles		70.69%		70.02%
Percentage of Non-Subvented Receivables		79.52%		97.50%
Weighted Average FICO Score		746.04		737.09
Weighted Average Loan-to-Value		95.08		94.21
Cutoff Date		July 1, 2015		January 1, 2018

Distribution of the Initial Receivables Pool by Annual Percentage Rate

Annual Percentage Rate Range	AART 2015-1							AART 2018-1
	Number of Contracts		Aggregate Amount Financed			Percentage of Aggregate Amount Financed		Number of Contracts		Aggregate Amount Financed			Percentage of Aggregate Amount Financed
0.00% to 1.00%		7,650		$	192,353,232.30		18.57%		2,188		$	24,002,778.51		2.14%
1.01% to 2.00%		946		$	19,271,029.76		1.86%		283		$	3,487,239.11		0.31%
2.01% to 3.00%		9,898		$	181,334,826.84		17.51%		8,161		$	142,123,125.14		12.69%
3.01% to 4.00%		9,469		$	183,383,571.59		17.70%		11,841		$	203,436,277.26		18.17%
4.01% to 5.00%		9,653		$	182,644,252.33		17.63%		10,786		$	174,599,348.76		15.59%
5.01% to 6.00%		7,102		$	129,435,917.58		12.50%		9,820		$	159,982,516.73		14.29%
6.01% to 7.00%		4,835		$	88,143,181.27		8.51%		7,670		$	126,850,724.30		11.33%
7.01% to 8.00%		2,502		$	44,134,004.84		4.26%		6,197		$	96,679,202.21		8.63%
8.01% to 9.00%		773		$	13,055,820.53		1.26%		4,461		$	70,886,858.80		6.33%
9.01% to 10.00%		138		$	1,893,645.66		0.18%		3,125		$	47,951,310.77		4.28%
10.01% to 11.00%		19		$	195,461.92		0.02%		2,133		$	32,280,059.54		2.88%
11.01% to 12.00%		5		$	47,423.88		0.00%		1,384		$	19,947,211.10		1.78%
12.01% to 13.00%		1		$	3,776.35		0.00%		758		$	9,879,786.59		0.88%
13.01% to 14.00%		—		$	—		—%		386		$	4,757,178.45		0.42%
14.01% to 15.00%		—		$	—		—%		179		$	1,962,216.15		0.18%
15.01% to 16.00%		—		$	—		—%		67		$	661,653.00		0.06%
16.01% to 17.00%		—		$	—		—%		27		$	240,694.10		0.02%
17.01% to 18.00%		—		$	—		—%		5		$	45,352.86		0.00%
18.01% to 19.00%		—		$	—		—%		—		$	—		—%
Total		52,991		$	1,035,896,144.85		100.00%		69,471		$	1,119,773,433.38		100.00%

A-30

Distribution of the Receivables Pool by State

The following tables set forth the percentage of the Aggregate Amount Financed in the states with the largest concentration of receivables for each of these pools. The following breakdown by state is based on the billing addresses of the obligors on the receivables:

AART 2015-1
State	Percentage of Aggregate     Amount Financed
Texas		13.97%
California		7.24%
Florida		7.20%
Pennsylvania		5.13%
Illinois		4.61%
Michigan		4.36%

The AART 2015-1 pool of receivables includes receivables originated in all 50 states and the District of Columbia. No other state accounts for more than 3.65% of the Aggregate Amount Financed for the AART 2015-1 pool of receivables.

AART 2018-1
State	Percentage of Aggregate     Amount Financed
Texas		13.50	%
California		9.48	%
Florida		9.28	%
Pennsylvania		4.57	%
Illinois		4.28	%
Georgia		4.16	%

The AART 2018-1 pool of receivables includes receivables originated in all 50 states and the District of Columbia. No other state accounts for more than 3.78% of the Aggregate Amount Financed for the AART 2018-1 pool of receivables.

Distribution of the Receivables Pool by Vehicle Make

AART 2015-1
Vehicle Make	Percentage of Aggregate     Amount Financed
Chevrolet		41.33%
GMC		13.60%
Buick		6.10%
Jeep		5.60%
Ford		5.35%
Ram		4.44%
Dodge		4.36%
Cadillac		3.80%
Nissan		2.08%
Chrysler		1.84%

No other make accounts for more than 1.82% of the Aggregate Amount Financed in the AART 2015-1 pool of receivables.

AART 2018-1
Vehicle Make	Percentage of Aggregate     Amount Financed
Chevrolet		33.35%
GMC		9.42%
Ford		8.40%
Jeep		7.59%
Ram		6.02%
Nissan		4.20%
Dodge		4.08%
Kia		3.64%
Toyota		3.60%
Hyundai		3.28%

No other make accounts for more than 2.97% of the Aggregate Amount Financed in the AART 2018-1 pool of receivables.

A-31

Distribution of the Receivables Pool by Vehicle Model

AART 2015-1
Vehicle Model	Percentage of Aggregate     Amount Financed
Silverado		15.07%
Sierra		6.13%
Equinox		4.18%
Ram Pickup		4.08%
Cruze		3.53%
Acadia		3.08%
Traverse		2.98%
Malibu		2.44%
Enclave		2.38%
Grand Cherokee		2.36%

No other model accounts for more than 2.29% of the Aggregate Amount Financed in the AART 2015-1 pool of receivables.

AART 2018-1
Vehicle Model	Percentage of Aggregate     Amount Financed
Silverado		11.31%
Sierra		4.63%
Ram Pickup		4.57%
Equinox		3.53%
Grand Cherokee		2.96%
Cruze		2.75%
Malibu		2.59%
Wrangler		2.18%
Express		1.93%
Traverse		1.80%

No other model accounts for more than 1.51% of the Aggregate Amount Financed in the AART 2018-1 pool of receivables.

A-32

ALLY AUTO RECEIVABLES TRUST 2015-2

Initial Aggregate Amount Financed: $1,094,598,443.79

			Net Loss Statistics
			Total for Month				Cumulative
Month	Prepayment Speeds		$		%		$		%
Aug-15		1.23		—		0.000000%		—		0.000000%
Sept-15		1.31		46,320.04		0.004232%		46,320.04		0.004232%
Oct-15		1.30		68,996.25		0.006303%		115,316.29		0.010535%
Nov-15		1.14		179,924.21		0.016437%		295,240.50		0.026972%
Dec-15		1.28		309,069.03		0.028236%		604,309.53		0.055208%
Jan-16		1.14		236,050.55		0.021565%		840,360.08		0.076773%
Feb-16		1.32		271,902.82		0.024840%		1,112,262.90		0.101614%
Mar-16		1.42		331,039.93		0.030243%		1,443,302.83		0.131857%
Apr-16		1.26		142,119.51		0.012984%		1,585,422.34		0.144841%
May-16		1.29		146,929.62		0.013423%		1,732,351.96		0.158264%
Jun-16		1.34		237,313.29		0.021680%		1,969,665.25		0.179944%
Jul-16		1.23		220,306.23		0.020127%		2,189,971.48		0.200071%
Aug-16		1.44		297,098.15		0.027142%		2,487,069.63		0.227213%
Sep-16		1.20		269,578.22		0.024628%		2,756,647.85		0.251841%
Oct-16		1.23		306,275.49		0.027981%		3,062,923.34		0.279822%
Nov-16		1.13		375,744.87		0.034327%		3,438,668.21		0.314149%
Dec-16		1.15		156,834.47		0.014328%		3,595,502.68		0.328477%
Jan-17		1.16		290,174.86		0.026510%		3,885,677.54		0.354987%
Feb-17		1.12		231,018.21		0.021105%		4,116,695.75		0.376092%
Mar-17		1.34		323,427.19		0.029548%		4,440,122.94		0.405639%
Apr-17		1.08		207,788.41		0.018983%		4,647,911.35		0.424623%
May-17		1.29		178,216.91		0.016281%		4,826,128.26		0.440904%
Jun-17		1.24		275,076.39		0.025130%		5,101,204.65		0.466034%
Jul-17		1.09		152,877.54		0.013967%		5,254,082.19		0.480001%
Aug-17		1.21		95,003.78		0.008679%		5,349,085.97		0.488680%
Sep-17		1.09		203,752.21		0.018614%		5,552,838.18		0.507295%
Oct-17		1.20		207,851.62		0.018989%		5,760,689.80		0.526283%
Nov-17		1.03		203,776.63		0.018617%		5,964,466.43		0.544900%

A-33

AART 2015-2: Delinquency Data

Month	Units									$								% 61+ days         delinquent
	31-60		61-90		91-120			121+		31-60		61-90		91-120		121+
Aug-15		331		7		1	(1)		—		5,886,161.75		90,003.54		8,654.22		—		0.009336%
Sep-15		403		44		1			—		7,162,778.37		813,064.42		15,184.71		—		0.081336%
Oct-15		412		61		8			—		7,167,053.22		1,067,120.71		179,781.28		—		0.127152%
Nov-15		452		69		16			—		8,062,538.53		1,124,194.21		355,605.97		—		0.156420%
Dec-15		484		82		11			1		8,361,300.09		1,491,812.20		199,978.98		27,158.03		0.188924%
Jan-16		518		95		15			—		9,108,573.54		1,785,617.06		316,028.32		—		0.239749%
Feb-16		324		75		17			—		5,684,449.40		1,378,772.32		338,029.78		—		0.204046%
Mar-16		361		41		12			—		6,204,126.00		825,541.42		223,209.47		—		0.130254%
Apr-16		404		67		14			—		6,639,159.41		1,083,036.16		278,316.56		—		0.176268%
May-16		404		63		20			—		6,579,269.89		952,471.65		293,867.09		—		0.168488%
Jun-16		397		81		15			—		6,304,420.35		1,361,762.06		170,585.38		—		0.216652%
Jul-16		445		82		17			—		7,310,310.54		1,233,217.94		192,516.25		—		0.210567%
Aug-16		427		95		13			—		6,695,788.58		1,550,140.46		183,340.35		—		0.268824%
Sep-16		436		82		25			—		6,497,248.24		1,178,375.82		413,461.83		—		0.258126%
Oct-16		465		95		25			—		7,291,276.86		1,239,837.45		317,912.95		—		0.264559%
Nov-16		476		98		28			—		7,119,259.33		1,548,143.06		262,888.59		—		0.321738%
Dec-16		526		104		26			—		7,528,042.11		1,505,140.62		387,680.19		—		0.352222%
Jan-17		461		114		26			1		6,802,027.95		1,490,759.00		287,055.92		21.93		0.346952%
Feb-17		411		105		24			—		5,719,429.38		1,509,010.06		311,055.07		—		0.372550%
Mar-17		389		55		27			—		5,206,770.30		747,401.38		273,731.42		—		0.220700%
Apr-17		405		93		16			—		5,092,317.84		1,210,727.90		169,820.87		—		0.313281%
May-17		396		73		21			—		5,155,490.22		935,652.63		184,957.95		—		0.268766%
Jun-17		396		78		20			1		5,045,913.67		1,010,430.67		267,660.07		8,196.25		0.325977%
Jul-17		386		79		19			—		4,944,245.97		991,842.99		227,272.45		—		0.325604%
Aug-17		399		87		25			1		4,866,839.82		1,123,713.75		265,320.74		7,395.88		0.394761%
Sep-17		407		93		30			2		4,880,544.11		986,631.20		362,652.05		8,296.94		0.405324%
Oct-17		427		93		20			1		4,980,082.50		1,123,010.95		154,847.92		19,582.76		0.411050%
Nov-17		409		97		22			—		4,898,003.90		970,830.36		266,052.94		—		0.414348%

⁽¹⁾ Because the collections available for distribution on the initial distribution date (October 15, 2015) included amounts received during both the August 2015 and September 2015 Monthly Periods, the Servicer’s recordkeeping system cannot determine whether the receivable reported as being 91 days or more delinquent was more than 121 days delinquent at the end of the August 2015 Monthly Period. This receivable satisfied the eligibility criteria set forth in the related pooling agreement as of the applicable cutoff date, but certain payments received from the obligor for this receivable were reversed subsequent to the cutoff date.

A-34

Initial Receivables Pool Characteristics

	AART 2015-2		AART 2018-1
Weighted Average APR		4.34%		5.88%
Aggregate Amount Financed	$	1,094,598,443.79	$	1,119,773,433.38
Number of Contracts in Pool		59,975		69,471
Average Amount Financed		$18,250.91	$	16,118.57
Weighted Average Original Maturity (in Months)		65.95		66.13
Weighted Average Remaining Maturity (in Months)		52.31		52.68
Percentage of Receivables with Original Maturities > 60 Months		65.62%		67.25%
Percentage of New Vehicles		70.90%		70.02%
Percentage of Non-Subvented Receivables		81.74%		97.50%
Weighted Average FICO Score		740.24		737.09
Weighted Average Loan-to-Value		95.79		94.21
Cutoff Date		August 1, 2015		January 1, 2018

Distribution of the Initial Receivables Pool by Annual Percentage Rate

	AART 2015-2						AART 2018-1
Annual Percentage Rate Range	Number of   Contracts		Aggregate Amount Financed		Percentage of   Aggregate Amount Financed		Number of  Contracts		Aggregate Amount Financed		Percentage of Aggregate Amount Financed
0.00% to 1.00%		7,397	$	161,641,181.32		14.77%		2,188	$	24,002,778.51		2.14%
1.01% to 2.00%		1,259	$	22,292,869.49		2.04%		283	$	3,487,239.11		0.31%
2.01% to 3.00%		9,649	$	172,647,577.37		15.77%		8,161	$	142,123,125.14		12.69%
3.01% to 4.00%		10,073	$	190,266,510.05		17.38%		11,841	$	203,436,277.26		18.17%
4.01% to 5.00%		10,226	$	185,134,399.23		16.91%		10,786	$	174,599,348.76		15.59%
5.01% to 6.00%		8,052	$	139,951,018.75		12.79%		9,820	$	159,982,516.73		14.29%
6.01% to 7.00%		5,425	$	95,493,359.79		8.72%		7,670	$	126,850,724.30		11.33%
7.01% to 8.00%		3,605	$	58,309,022.63		5.33%		6,197	$	96,679,202.21		8.63%
8.01% to 9.00%		1,803	$	30,388,540.06		2.78%		4,461	$	70,886,858.80		6.33%
9.01% to 10.00%		1,191	$	18,839,473.81		1.72%		3,125	$	47,951,310.77		4.28%
10.01% to 11.00%		755	$	11,983,972.33		1.09%		2,133	$	32,280,059.54		2.88%
11.01% to 12.00%		386	$	5,762,228.53		0.53%		1,384	$	19,947,211.10		1.78%
12.01% to 13.00%		131	$	1,662,342.97		0.15%		758	$	9,879,786.59		0.88%
13.01% to 14.00%		20	$	199,328.94		0.02%		386	$	4,757,178.45		0.42%
14.01% to 15.00%		3	$	26,618.52		0.00%		179	$	1,962,216.15		0.18%
15.01% to 16.00%		—	$	—		—%		67	$	661,653.00		0.06%
16.01% to 17.00%		—	$	—		—%		27	$	240,694.10		0.02%
17.01% to 18.00%		—	$	—		—%		5	$	45,352.86		0.00%
18.01% to 19.00%		—	$	—		—%		—	$	—		—%
Total		59,975	$	1,094,598.443.79		100.00%		69,471	$	1,119,773,433.38		100.00%

A-35

Distribution of the Receivables Pool by State

The following tables set forth the percentage of the Aggregate Amount Financed in the states with the largest concentration of receivables for each of these pools. The following breakdown by state is based on the billing addresses of the obligors on the receivables:

AART 2015-2
State	Percentage of           Aggregate     Amount  Financed
Texas	13.59%
California	7.91%
Florida	7.12%
Pennsylvania	5.18%
Illinois	4.74%
Michigan	4.45%
The AART 2015-2 pool of receivables includes receivables originated in all 50 states and the District of Columbia. No other state accounts for more than 3.52% of the Aggregate Amount Financed for the AART 2015-2 pool of receivables.

AART 2018-1
State	Percentage of Aggregate     Amount Financed
Texas	13.50%
California	9.48%
Florida	9.28%
Pennsylvania	4.57%
Illinois	4.28%
Georgia	4.16%
The AART 2018-1 pool of receivables includes receivables originated in all 50 states and the District of Columbia. No other state accounts for more than 3.78% of the Aggregate Amount Financed for the AART 2018-1 pool of receivables.

Distribution of the Receivables Pool by Vehicle Make

AART 2015-2
Vehicle Make	Percentage of Aggregate     Amount Financed
Chevrolet	41.25%
GMC	12.73%
Ford	5.66%
Jeep	5.57%
Buick	5.34%
Dodge	4.60%
Ram	4.46%
Cadillac	3.86%
Nissan	2.21%
Kia	2.00%
No other make accounts for more than 1.96% of the Aggregate Amount Financed in the AART 2015-2 pool of receivables.

AART 2018-1
Vehicle Make	Percentage of Aggregate     Amount Financed
Chevrolet	33.35%
GMC	9.42%
Ford	8.40%
Jeep	7.59%
Ram	6.02%
Nissan	4.20%
Dodge	4.08%
Kia	3.64%
Toyota	3.60%
Hyundai	3.28%
No other make accounts for more than 2.97% of the Aggregate Amount Financed in the AART 2018-1 pool of receivables.

A-36

Distribution of the Receivables Pool by Vehicle Model

AART 2015-2
Vehicle Model	Percentage of Aggregate Amount Financed
Silverado	14.27%
Sierra	5.60%
Equinox	3.97%
Ram Pickup	3.95%
Cruze	3.86%
Acadia	2.97%
Traverse	2.91%
Malibu	2.80%
Camaro	2.13%
Grand Cherokee	2.12%
No other model accounts for more than 2.07% of the Aggregate Amount Financed in the AART 2015-2 pool of receivables.

AART 2018-1
Vehicle Model	Percentage of Aggregate Amount Financed
Silverado	11.31%
Sierra	4.63%
Ram Pickup	4.57%
Equinox	3.53%
Grand Cherokee	2.96%
Cruze	2.75%
Malibu	2.59%
Wrangler	2.18%
Express	1.93%
Traverse	1.80%
No other model accounts for more than 1.51% of the Aggregate Amount Financed in the AART 2018-1 pool of receivables.

A-37

ALLY AUTO RECEIVABLES TRUST 2016-1

Initial Aggregate Amount Financed: $1,066,738,356.26

		Net Loss Statistics
		Total for Month					Cumulative
Month	Prepayment Speeds	$		%			$		%
Dec-15	1.27		—		0.000000	%		—		0.000000	%
Jan-16	1.08		24,940.91		0.002338	%		24,940.91		0.002338	%
Feb-16	1.30		103,854.87		0.009736	%		128,795.78		0.012074	%
Mar-16	1.39		159,746.52		0.014975	%		288,542.30		0.027049	%
Apr-16	1.27		107,995.33		0.010124	%		396,537.63		0.037173	%
May-16	1.36		168,725.85		0.015817	%		565,263.48		0.052990	%
Jun-16	1.32		246,200.22		0.023080	%		811,463.70		0.076070	%
Jul-16	1.21		307,756.77		0.028850	%		1,119,220.47		0.104920	%
Aug-16	1.44		233,873.19		0.021924	%		1,353,093.66		0.126844	%
Sep-16	1.29		236,361.73		0.022157	%		1,589,455.39		0.149001	%
Oct-16	1.20		255,819.76		0.023981	%		1,845,275.15		0.172983	%
Nov-16	1.12		170,904.59		0.016021	%		2,016,179.74		0.189004	%
Dec-16	1.20		382,015.39		0.035812	%		2,398,195.13		0.224816	%
Jan-17	1.22		247,671.55		0.023218	%		2,645,866.68		0.248033	%
Feb-17	1.13		299,538.81		0.028080	%		2,945,405.49		0.276113	%
Mar-17	1.42		257,084.21		0.024100	%		3,202,489.70		0.300213	%
Apr-17	1.19		271,359.19		0.025438	%		3,473,848.89		0.325651	%
May-17	1.26		212,884.95		0.019957	%		3,686,733.84		0.345608	%
Jun-17	1.25		153,292.34		0.014370	%		3,840,026.18		0.359978	%
Jul-17	1.25		314,524.12		0.029485	%		4,154,550.30		0.389463	%
Aug-17	1.29		208,382.71		0.019535	%		4,362,933.01		0.408997	%
Sep-17	1.13		333,497.91		0.031263	%		4,696,430.92		0.440261	%
Oct-17	1.22		104,249.63		0.009773	%		4,800,680.55		0.450034	%
Nov-17	1.11		268,923.19		0.025210	%		5,069,603.74		0.475243	%

A-38

AART 2016-1 Delinquency Data

Month	Units							$								% 61+ days delinquent
	31-60	61-90		91-120		121+		31-60		61-90		91-120		121+
Dec-15	315		5		—		—		5,492,487.89		104,529.98		—		—		0.010143	%
Jan-16	376		50		1		—		6,724,672.71		898,918.98		47,443.34		—		0.094843	%
Feb-16	259		48		9		—		4,753,102.71		857,035.68		118,749.65		—		0.101381	%
Mar-16	270		49		4		—		5,300,811.55		868,028.07		61,022.64		—		0.100297	%
Apr-16	297		42		6		—		5,429,802.44		731,068.23		73,792.81		—		0.090170	%
May-16	326		64		8		—		5,798,745.15		1,092,931.72		102,262.81		—		0.139259	%
Jun-16	328		65		16		—		5,719,453.24		1,179,905.89		229,759.68		—		0.170802	%
Jul-16	370		62		18		—		6,367,895.45		1,085,640.98		374,125.58		—		0.183756	%
Aug-16	391		63		14		—		6,589,696.69		1,221,891.41		245,236.58		—		0.192785	%
Sep-16	400		93		14		—		6,679,936.49		1,486,406.21		271,446.82		—		0.240623	%
Oct-16	408		75		22		1		6,597,814.31		1,340,516.20		271,319.57		33,968.89		0.234509	%
Nov-16	458		95		21		—		7,383,264.63		1,511,067.89		328,979.45		—		0.272737	%
Dec-16	485		100		31		—		7,478,984.17		1,498,692.48		453,335.91		—		0.301671	%
Jan-17	436		107		22		4		6,797,961.74		1,459,685.38		312,451.39		20,430.02		0.289124	%
Feb-17	379		76		29		—		5,695,139.58		1,202,288.34		348,589.14		—		0.260846	%
Mar-17	384		61		18		—		5,608,729.36		760,619.91		251,764.52		—		0.178913	%
Apr-17	382		83		25		—		5,308,844.08		1,122,175.91		224,442.59		—		0.248931	%
May-17	369		90		25		—		5,313,263.96		1,118,543.74		305,822.09		—		0.276125	%
Jun-17	408		74		26		1		5,847,007.43		981,470.54		243,232.82		18,138.97		0.252853	%
Jul-17	419		98		20		1		5,801,814.11		1,348,163.48		195,386.14		6,744.49		0.331374	%
Aug-17	397		89		26		—		5,291,936.32		1,270,343.49		299,106.17		—		0.353224	%
Sep-17	426		108		24		1		5,820,277.59		1,283,119.21		289,534.62		565.00		0.371787	%
Oct-17	385		100		31		—		5,157,774.99		1,250,805.55		301,604.35		—		0.386592	%
Nov-17	415		107		21		—		5,378,413.84		1,472,981.05		244,721.01		—		0.450022	%

A-39

Initial Receivables Pool Characteristics

	AART 2016-1		AART 2018-1
Weighted Average APR		4.27%		5.88%
Aggregate Amount Financed		$1,066,738,356.26	$	1,119,773,433.38
Number of Contracts in Pool		58,961		69,471
Average Amount Financed		$18,092.27	$	16,118.57
Weighted Average Original Maturity (in Months)		65.55		66.13
Weighted Average Remaining Maturity (in Months)		53.95		52.68
Percentage of Receivables with Original Maturities > 60 Months		63.91%		67.25%
Percentage of New Vehicles		70.73%		70.02%
Percentage of Non-Subvented Receivables		79.85%		97.50%
Weighted Average FICO Score		740.71		737.09
Weighted Average Loan-to-Value		94.35		94.21
Cutoff Date		December 1, 2015		January 1, 2018

Distribution of the Receivables Pool by Annual Percentage Rate

Annual Percentage Rate Range	AART 2016-1						AART 2018-1
	Number of    Contracts		Aggregate Amount Financed		Percentage of   Aggregate Amount Financed		Number of Contracts		Aggregate Amount Financed		Percentage of  Aggregate Amount Financed
0.00% to 1.00%		7,802	$	180,700,612.25		16.94%		2,188	$	24,002,778.51		2.14%
1.01% to 2.00%		970	$	19,220,084.19		1.80%		283	$	3,487,239.11		0.31%
2.01% to 3.00%		9,468	$	160,100,829.86		15.01%		8,161	$	142,123,125.14		12.69%
3.01% to 4.00%		9,532	$	175,253,045.41		16.43%		11,841	$	203,436,277.26		18.17%
4.01% to 5.00%		9,821	$	171,253,354.93		16.05%		10,786	$	174,599,348.76		15.59%
5.01% to 6.00%		7,898	$	137,967,513.32		12.93%		9,820	$	159,982,516.73		14.29%
6.01% to 7.00%		5,572	$	97,628,192.95		9.15%		7,670	$	126,850,724.30		11.33%
7.01% to 8.00%		3,622	$	58,577,401.00		5.49%		6,197	$	96,679,202.21		8.63%
8.01% to 9.00%		1,891	$	30,338,342.70		2.84%		4,461	$	70,886,858.80		6.33%
9.01% to 10.00%		1,141	$	17,943,698.07		1.68%		3,125	$	47,951,310.77		4.28%
10.01% to 11.00%		681	$	10,221,713.69		0.96%		2,133	$	32,280,059.54		2.88%
11.01% to 12.00%		379	$	5,275,778.32		0.49%		1,384	$	19,947,211.10		1.78%
12.01% to 13.00%		116	$	1,474,503.99		0.14%		758	$	9,879,786.59		0.88%
13.01% to 14.00%		59	$	689,233.45		0.06%		386	$	4,757,178.45		0.42%
14.01% to 15.00%		6	$	56,300.97		0.01%		179	$	1,962,216.15		0.18%
15.01% to 16.00%		3	$	37,751.16		0.00%		67	$	661,653.00		0.06%
16.01% to 17.00%		—	$	—		—%		27	$	240,694.10		0.02%
17.01% to 18.00%		—	$	—		—%		5	$	45,352.86		0.00%
18.01% to 19.00%		—	$	—		—%		—	$	—		—%
Total		58,961	$	1,066,738,356.26		100.00%		69,471	$	1,119,773,433.38		100.00%

A-40

Distribution of the Receivables Pool by State

The following tables set forth the percentage of the Aggregate Amount Financed in the states with the largest concentration of receivables for each of these pools. The following breakdown by state is based on the billing addresses of the obligors on the receivables.

AART 2016-1
State	Percentage of Aggregate   Amount Financed
Texas	12.65%
California	8.83%
Florida	7.58%
Pennsylvania	5.58%
Illinois	5.02%
Michigan	4.39%

The AART 2016-1 pool of receivables includes receivables originated in all 50 states and the District of Columbia. No other state accounts for more than 3.54% of the Aggregate Amount Financed for the AART 2016-1 pool of receivables.

AART 2018-1
State	Percentage of Aggregate   Amount Financed
Texas	13.50%
California	9.48%
Florida	9.28%
Pennsylvania	4.57%
Illinois	4.28%
Georgia	4.16%

The AART 2018-1 pool of receivables includes receivables originated in all 50 states and the District of Columbia. No other state accounts for more than 3.78% of the Aggregate Amount Financed for the AART 2018-1 pool of receivables.

Distribution of the Receivables Pool by Vehicle Make

AART 2016-1
Vehicle Make	Percentage of Aggregate   Amount Financed
Chevrolet	42.66%
GMC	10.66%
Buick	5.94%
Ford	5.58%
Jeep	5.04%
Dodge	4.16%
Ram	3.73%
Cadillac	3.27%
Nissan	2.80%
Kia	2.29%

No other make accounts for more than 2.28% of the Aggregate Amount Financed in the AART 2016-1 pool of receivables.

AART 2018-1
Vehicle Make	Percentage of Aggregate   Amount Financed
Chevrolet	33.35%
GMC	9.42%
Ford	8.40%
Jeep	7.59%
Ram	6.02%
Nissan	4.20%
Dodge	4.08%
Kia	3.64%
Toyota	3.60%
Hyundai	3.28%

No other make accounts for more than 2.97% of the Aggregate Amount Financed in the AART 2018-1 pool of receivables.

A-41

Distribution of the Receivables Pool by Vehicle Model

AART 2016-1
Vehicle Model	Percentage of Aggregate   Amount Financed
Silverado	14.92%
Sierra	4.57%
Cruze	4.27%
Equinox	3.74%
Camaro	3.46%
Ram Pickup	3.16%
Malibu	2.97%
Acadia	2.80%
Traverse	2.64%
Encore	2.07%

No other model accounts for more than 1.88% of the Aggregate Amount Financed in the AART 2016-1 pool of receivables.

AART 2018-1
Vehicle Model	Percentage of Aggregate   Amount Financed
Silverado	11.31%
Sierra	4.63%
Ram Pickup	4.57%
Equinox	3.53%
Grand Cherokee	2.96%
Cruze	2.75%
Malibu	2.59%
Wrangler	2.18%
Express	1.93%
Traverse	1.80%

No other model accounts for more than 1.51% of the Aggregate Amount Financed in the AART 2018-1 pool of receivables.

A-42

ALLY AUTO RECEIVABLES TRUST 2016-2

Initial Aggregate Amount Financed: $1,034,838,476.98

			Net Loss Statistics
			Total for Month					Cumulative
Month	Prepayment Speeds		$		%			$		%
Jan-16		1.18		—		0.000000	%		—		0.000000	%
Feb-16		1.39		23,396.02		0.002261	%		23,396.02		0.002261	%
Mar-16		1.42		38,066.51		0.003678	%		61,462.53		0.005939	%
Apr-16		1.23		130,312.40		0.012593	%		191,774.93		0.018532	%
May-16		1.41		183,160.89		0.017699	%		374,935.82		0.036231	%
Jun-16		1.23		182,426.82		0.017629	%		557,362.64		0.053860	%
Jul-16		1.27		294,693.60		0.028477	%		852,056.24		0.082337	%
Aug-16		1.45		258,702.66		0.024999	%		1,110,758.90		0.107336	%
Sep-16		1.30		297,423.15		0.028741	%		1,408,182.05		0.136077	%
Oct-16		1.16		203,121.02		0.019628	%		1,611,303.07		0.155706	%
Nov-16		1.16		264,455.14		0.025555	%		1,875,758.21		0.181261	%
Dec-16		1.12		195,686.17		0.018910	%		2,071,444.38		0.200171	%
Jan-17		1.21		297,401.31		0.028739	%		2,368,845.69		0.228910	%
Feb-17		1.10		464,293.78		0.044866	%		2,833,139.47		0.273776	%
Mar-17		1.37		389,445.63		0.037633	%		3,222,585.10		0.311409	%
Apr-17		1.03		136,885.90		0.013228	%		3,359,471.00		0.324637	%
May-17		1.32		184,896.04		0.017867	%		3,544,367.04		0.342504	%
Jun-17		1.27		275,042.63		0.026578	%		3,819,409.67		0.369083	%
Jul-17		1.21		198,266.82		0.019159	%		4,017,676.49		0.388242	%
Aug-17		1.23		149,621.55		0.014458	%		4,167,298.04		0.402700	%
Sep-17		1.09		167,442.27		0.016181	%		4,334,740.31		0.418881	%
Oct-17		1.23		258,898.60		0.025018	%		4,593,638.91		0.443899	%
Nov-17		1.13		227,453.18		0.021980	%		4,821,092.09		0.465879	%

A-43

AART 2016-2 Delinquency Data

	Units								$								% 61+ days delinquent
Month	31-60		61-90		91-120		121+		31-60		61-90		91-120		121+
Jan-16		301		4		—		—		5,421,677.91		91,664.35		—		—		0.009154%
Feb-16		244		33		1		—		4,311,189.71		702,847.83		21,163.03		—		0.075004%
Mar-16		222		33		7		—		3,849,156.74		437,548.91		147,498.69		—		0.062962%
Apr-16		273		56		5		—		4,965,860.32		880,474.44		47,816.82		—		0.103525%
May-16		293		46		13		—		4,909,400.82		760,800.87		175,007.16		—		0.108551%
Jun-16		318		44		9		—		5,601,006.79		614,199.09		115,637.81		—		0.087850%
Jul-16		362		57		10		—		6,203,073.90		898,167.06		169,251.55		—		0.133514%
Aug-16		332		75		11		—		5,685,601.88		1,235,137.04		134,792.76		—		0.178737%
Sep-16		355		56		20		2		6,005,060.48		889,145.61		321,139.63		31,619.60		0.168683%
Oct-16		407		71		15		—		6,855,135.31		1,246,810.11		228,802.18		—		0.208313%
Nov-16		415		76		16		—		6,801,168.46		1,298,317.21		244,294.19		—		0.226509%
Dec-16		469		94		25		—		7,686,668.16		1,598,084.09		451,260.50		—		0.313040%
Jan-17		399		96		29		—		6,046,068.59		1,502,564.09		446,347.80		—		0.310417%
Feb-17		381		61		22		—		5,936,363.76		779,117.88		291,606.53		—		0.177593%
Mar-17		339		63		14		—		5,166,292.39		957,629.74		119,708.03		—		0.187363%
Apr-17		380		85		18		—		5,553,226.44		1,071,451.85		212,029.98		—		0.232508%
May-17		360		66		21		—		5,540,591.65		875,146.39		149,439.41		—		0.194717%
Jun-17		355		73		15		2		5,047,529.72		1,055,340.69		152,303.10		10,926.90		0.242880%
Jul-17		372		76		22		1		5,275,587.21		1,021,104.58		273,520.69		10,909.59		0.272840%
Aug-17		376		88		18		1		5,374,128.88		1,205,155.06		196,990.48		10,909.59		0.310140%
Sep-17		413		85		33		—		5,618,080.75		1,077,556.46		508,696.79		—		0.364795%
Oct-17		392		99		18		1		5,203,702.07		1,192,856.25		193,671.75		5,694.44		0.337062%
Nov-17		405		99		21		1		5,303,450.22		1,145,153.46		224,718.69		10,782.25		0.351368%

A-44

Initial Receivables Pool Characteristics

	AART 2016-2		AART 2018-1
Weighted Average APR		4.36%		5.88%
Aggregate Amount Financed		$1,034,838,476.98	$	1,119,773,433.38
Number of Contracts in Pool		57,588		69,471
Average Amount Financed		$17,969.69	$	16,118.57
Weighted Average Original Maturity (in Months)		66.12		66.13
Weighted Average Remaining Maturity (in Months)		54.15		52.68
Percentage of Receivables with Original Maturities > 60 Months		68.03%		67.25%
Percentage of New Vehicles		70.01%		70.02%
Percentage of Non-Subvented Receivables		79.97%		97.50%
Weighted Average FICO Score		740.05		737.09
Weighted Average Loan-to-Value		94.65		94.21
Cutoff Date		January 1, 2016		January 1, 2018

Distribution of the Receivables Pool by Annual Percentage Rate

	AART 2016-2							AART 2018-1
Annual Percentage Rate Range	Number of Contracts		Aggregate Amount Financed			Percentage of Aggregate Amount Financed		Number of Contracts		Aggregate Amount Financed			Percentage of Aggregate Amount Financed
0.00% to 1.00%		7,424		$	167,368,346.92		16.17%		2,188		$	24,002,778.51		2.14%
1.01% to 2.00%		968		$	20,275,667.57		1.96%		283		$	3,487,239.11		0.31%
2.01% to 3.00%		8,962		$	150,432,922.48		14.54%		8,161		$	142,123,125.14		12.69%
3.01% to 4.00%		9,241		$	168,274,970.69		16.26%		11,841		$	203,436,277.26		18.17%
4.01% to 5.00%		9,569		$	165,318,448.16		15.98%		10,786		$	174,599,348.76		15.59%
5.01% to 6.00%		7,906		$	139,093,649.92		13.44%		9,820		$	159,982,516.73		14.29%
6.01% to 7.00%		5,600		$	97,180,711.70		9.39%		7,670		$	126,850,724.30		11.33%
7.01% to 8.00%		3,530		$	57,966,402.39		5.60%		6,197		$	96,679,202.21		8.63%
8.01% to 9.00%		1,983		$	32,658,955.98		3.16%		4,461		$	70,886,858.80		6.33%
9.01% to 10.00%		1,188		$	18,601,840.83		1.80%		3,125		$	47,951,310.77		4.28%
10.01% to 11.00%		678		$	10,524,974.54		1.02%		2,133		$	32,280,059.54		2.88%
11.01% to 12.00%		356		$	5,102,360.28		0.49%		1,384		$	19,947,211.10		1.78%
12.01% to 13.00%		145		$	1,633,542.82		0.16%		758		$	9,879,786.59		0.88%
13.01% to 14.00%		32		$	352,303.11		0.03%		386		$	4,757,178.45		0.42%
14.01% to 15.00%		5		$	45,940.02		0.00%		179		$	1,962,216.15		0.18%
15.01% to 16.00%		1		$	7,439.57		0.00%		67		$	661,653.00		0.06%
16.01% to 17.00%		—		$	—		—%		27		$	240,694.10		0.02%
17.01% to 18.00%		—		$	—		—%		5		$	45,352.86		0.00%
18.01% to 19.00%		—		$	—		—%		—		$	—		—%
Total		57,588		$	1,034,838,476.98		100.00%		69,471		$	1,119,773,433.38		100.00%

A-45

Distribution of the Receivables Pool by State

The following tables set forth the percentage of the Aggregate Amount Financed in the states with the largest concentration of receivables for each of these pools. The following breakdown by state is based on the billing addresses of the obligors on the receivables.

AART 2016-2
State	Percentage of Aggregate     Amount Financed
Texas		12.60%
California		8.49%
Florida		7.51%
Pennsylvania		5.44%
Illinois		5.03%
Michigan		4.23%

The AART 2016-2 pool of receivables includes receivables originated in all 50 states and the District of Columbia. No other state accounts for more than 3.64% of the Aggregate Amount Financed for the AART 2016-2 pool of receivables.

AART 2018-1
State	Percentage of Aggregate     Amount Financed
Texas		13.50	%
California		9.48	%
Florida		9.28	%
Pennsylvania		4.57	%
Illinois		4.28	%
Georgia		4.16	%

The AART 2018-1 pool of receivables includes receivables originated in all 50 states and the District of Columbia. No other state accounts for more than 3.78% of the Aggregate Amount Financed for the AART 2018-1 pool of receivables.

Distribution of the Receivables Pool by Vehicle Make

AART 2016-2
Vehicle Make	Percentage of Aggregate     Amount Financed
Chevrolet		43.08%
GMC		10.15%
Buick		5.62%
Ford		5.55%
Jeep		5.20%
Dodge		4.20%
Ram		3.66%
Cadillac		2.97%
Nissan		2.80%
Hyundai		2.46%

No other make accounts for more than 2.36% of the Aggregate Amount Financed in the AART 2016-2 pool of receivables.

AART 2018-1
Vehicle Make	Percentage of Aggregate     Amount Financed
Chevrolet		33.35%
GMC		9.42%
Ford		8.40%
Jeep		7.59%
Ram		6.02%
Nissan		4.20%
Dodge		4.08%
Kia		3.64%
Toyota		3.60%
Hyundai		3.28%

No other make accounts for more than 2.97% of the Aggregate Amount Financed in the AART 2018-1 pool of receivables.

A-46

Distribution of the Receivables Pool by Vehicle Model

AART 2016-2
Vehicle Model	Percentage of Aggregate     Amount Financed
Silverado		15.14%
Sierra		4.32%
Cruze		4.16%
Equinox		3.86%
Camaro		3.34%
Ram Pickup		3.15%
Malibu		3.08%
Acadia		2.69%
Traverse		2.65%
Encore		1.96%

No other model accounts for more than 1.94% of the Aggregate Amount Financed in the AART 2016-2 pool of receivables.

AART 2018-1
Vehicle Model	Percentage of Aggregate     Amount Financed
Silverado		11.31%
Sierra		4.63%
Ram Pickup		4.57%
Equinox		3.53%
Grand Cherokee		2.96%
Cruze		2.75%
Malibu		2.59%
Wrangler		2.18%
Express		1.93%
Traverse		1.80%

No other model accounts for more than 1.51% of the Aggregate Amount Financed in the AART 2018-1 pool of receivables.

A-47

ALLY AUTO RECEIVABLES TRUST 2016-3

Initial Aggregate Amount Financed: $516,182,817.60

			Net Loss Statistics
			Total for Month					Cumulative
Month	Prepayment Speeds		$		%			$		%
May-16		1.39		—		0.000000	%		—		0.000000	%
Jun-16		1.38		4,946.17		0.000958	%		4,946.17		0.000958	%
Jul-16		1.08		52,665.95		0.010203	%		57,612.12		0.011161	%
Aug-16		1.40		158,603.90		0.030726	%		216,216.02		0.041887	%
Sep-16		1.21		190,144.43		0.036837	%		406,360.45		0.078724	%
Oct-16		1.26		180,181.01		0.034906	%		586,541.46		0.113631	%
Nov-16		1.06		172,480.78		0.033415	%		759,022.24		0.147045	%
Dec-16		1.15		177,894.27		0.034463	%		936,916.51		0.181509	%
Jan-17		1.24		189,315.54		0.036676	%		1,126,232.05		0.218185	%
Feb-17		1.24		192,225.31		0.037240	%		1,318,457.36		0.255424	%
Mar-17		1.38		161,796.07		0.031345	%		1,480,253.43		0.286769	%
Apr-17		1.20		140,360.59		0.027192	%		1,620,614.02		0.313961	%
May-17		1.41		170,184.58		0.032970	%		1,790,798.60		0.346931	%
Jun-17		1.32		145,183.36		0.028126	%		1,935,981.96		0.375057	%
Jul-17		1.21		157,074.01		0.030430	%		2,093,055.97		0.405487	%
Aug-17		1.26		140,437.66		0.027207	%		2,233,493.63		0.432694	%
Sep-17		1.10		95,738.11		0.018547	%		2,329,231.74		0.451242	%
Oct-17		1.25		109,002.42		0.021117	%		2,438,234.16		0.472359	%
Nov-17		1.08		173,458.58		0.033604	%		2,611,692.74		0.505963	%

A-48

AART 2016-3 Delinquency Data

	Units								$								% 61+ days delinquent
Month	31-60		61-90		91-120		121+		31-60		61-90		91-120		121+
May-16		150		—		—		—		2,323,811.91		—		—		—		0.000000%
Jun-16		179		27		—		—		3,016,546.55		399,290.17		—		—		0.083873%
Jul-16		225		28		11		—		3,516,654.04		461,258.68		174,303.24		—		0.138533%
Aug-16		227		47		6		—		3,384,915.97		731,445.19		137,535.97		—		0.197705%
Sep-16		217		39		12		—		3,106,373.24		568,544.05		185,267.78		—		0.178581%
Oct-16		224		47		10		—		3,271,989.66		717,028.92		116,800.85		—		0.206001%
Nov-16		260		58		17		—		3,931,976.07		733,415.79		227,506.25		—		0.246888%
Dec-16		284		48		21		—		4,064,620.48		605,888.70		235,251.03		—		0.225255%
Jan-17		296		55		13		1		4,358,534.06		785,852.13		129,949.56		21.10		0.256159%
Feb-17		234		53		12		—		3,324,658.31		749,220.06		164,263.85		—		0.267013%
Mar-17		221		40		11		—		2,973,726.29		497,144.70		112,764.21		—		0.187042%
Apr-17		220		51		14		—		2,948,276.73		604,040.54		135,266.93		—		0.237071%
May-17		238		44		17		—		3,496,549.04		510,035.69		161,249.10		—		0.226304%
Jun-17		238		50		20		1		3,245,761.19		762,294.11		203,375.57		15.65		0.341768%
Jul-17		248		54		14		—		3,430,812.62		570,890.18		236,921.19		—		0.299680%
Aug-17		232		44		14		—		3,056,882.81		576,916.49		134,089.42		—		0.276955%
Sep-17		264		62		10		1		3,667,682.76		653,904.22		112,085.86		9,739.31		0.316485%
Oct-17		255		63		20		—		3,590,399.99		858,732.66		187,176.58		—		0.448783%
Nov-17		258		69		22		—		3,222,986.47		921,277.67		253,128.38		—		0.528357%

A-49

Initial Receivables Pool Characteristics

	AART 2016-3		AART 2018-1
Weighted Average APR		5.12%		5.88%
Aggregate Amount Financed		$516,182,817.60	$	1,119,773,433.38
Number of Contracts in Pool		37,913		69,471
Average Amount Financed		$13,614.93	$	16,118.57
Weighted Average Original Maturity (in Months)		65.31		66.13
Weighted Average Remaining Maturity (in Months)		50.90		52.68
Percentage of Receivables with Original Maturities > 60 Months		68.70%		67.25%
Percentage of New Vehicles		70.11%		70.02%
Percentage of Non-Subvented Receivables		90.80%		97.50%
Weighted Average FICO Score		739.74		737.09
Weighted Average Loan-to-Value		92.20		94.21
Cutoff Date		May 1, 2016		January 1, 2018

Distribution of the Initial Receivables Pool by Annual Percentage Rate

	AART 2016-3							AART 2018-1
Annual Percentage Rate Range	Number of Contracts		Aggregate Amount Financed		Percentage of Aggregate Amount Financed			Number of Contracts		Aggregate Amount Financed		Percentage of Aggregate Amount Financed
0.00% to 1.00%		2,972	$	37,263,002.93		7.22	%		2,188	$	24,002,778.51		2.14	%
1.01% to 2.00%		600	$	6,722,612.60		1.30	%		283	$	3,487,239.11		0.31	%
2.01% to 3.00%		6,212	$	77,818,990.27		15.08	%		8,161	$	142,123,125.14		12.69	%
3.01% to 4.00%		6,078	$	85,759,248.18		16.61	%		11,841	$	203,436,277.26		18.17	%
4.01% to 5.00%		6,186	$	84,099,271.02		16.29	%		10,786	$	174,599,348.76		15.59	%
5.01% to 6.00%		5,177	$	74,247,899.14		14.38	%		9,820	$	159,982,516.73		14.29	%
6.01% to 7.00%		3,976	$	60,988,643.66		11.82	%		7,670	$	126,850,724.30		11.33	%
7.01% to 8.00%		2,779	$	38,032.124.17		7.37	%		6,197	$	96,679,202.21		8.63	%
8.01% to 9.00%		1,594	$	22,154,009.11		4.29	%		4,461	$	70,886,858.80		6.33	%
9.01% to 10.00%		1,095	$	14,287,666.29		2.77	%		3,125	$	47,951,310.77		4.28	%
10.01% to 11.00%		668	$	8,368,037.91		1.62	%		2,133	$	32,280,059.54		2.88	%
11.01% to 12.00%		345	$	4,200,382.88		0.81	%		1,384	$	19,947,211.10		1.78	%
12.01% to 13.00%		155	$	1,590,602.86		0.31	%		758	$	9,879,786.59		0.88	%
13.01% to 14.00%		60	$	525,331.26		0.10	%		386	$	4,757,178.45		0.42	%
14.01% to 15.00%		14	$	105,456.28		0.02	%		179	$	1,962,216.15		0.18	%
15.01% to 16.00%		1	$	8,843.35		0.00	%		67	$	661,653.00		0.06	%
16.01% to 17.00%		1	$	10,695.69		0.00	%		27	$	240,694.10		0.02	%
17.01% to 18.00%		—	$	—		—	%		5	$	45,352.86		0.00	%
18.01% to 19.00%		—	$	—		—	%		—	$	—		—	%
Total		37,913	$	516,182,817.60		100.00	%		69,471	$	1,119,773,433.38		100.00	%

A-50

Distribution of the Initial Receivables Pool by State

The following table sets forth the percentage of the Aggregate Amount Financed in the states with the largest concentration of receivables for each of these pools. The following breakdown by state is based on the billing addresses of the obligors on the initial receivables:

AART 2016-3
State	Percentage of Aggregate     Amount Financed
Texas		11.48%
California		9.01%
Florida		8.62%
Pennsylvania		5.73%
Illinois		5.28%
Georgia		4.03%

The AART 2016-3 pool of receivables includes receivables originated in all 50 states and the District of Columbia. No other state accounts for more than 3.59% of the Aggregate Amount Financed for the AART 2016-3 pool of receivables.

AART 2018-1
State	Percentage of Aggregate     Amount Financed
Texas		13.50	%
California		9.48	%
Florida		9.28	%
Pennsylvania		4.57	%
Illinois		4.28	%
Georgia		4.16	%

The AART 2018-1 pool of receivables includes receivables originated in all 50 states and the District of Columbia. No other state accounts for more than 3.78% of the Aggregate Amount Financed for the AART 2018-1 pool of receivables.

Distribution of the Initial Receivables Pool by Vehicle Make

AART 2016-3
Vehicle Make	Percentage of Aggregate     Amount Financed
Chevrolet		41.09%
GMC		7.80%
Jeep		6.07%
Ford		6.06%
Dodge		5.27%
Nissan		4.09%
Buick		3.72%
Ram		3.70%
Kia		3.38%
Hyundai		3.32%

No other make accounts for more than 2.39% of the Aggregate Amount Financed in the AART 2016-3 pool of receivables.

AART 2018-1
Vehicle Make	Percentage of Aggregate     Amount Financed
Chevrolet		33.35%
GMC		9.42%
Ford		8.40%
Jeep		7.59%
Ram		6.02%
Nissan		4.20%
Dodge		4.08%
Kia		3.64%
Toyota		3.60%
Hyundai		3.28%

No other make accounts for more than 2.97% of the Aggregate Amount Financed in the AART 2018-1 pool of receivables.

A-51

Distribution of the Initial Receivables Pool by Vehicle Model

AART 2016-3
Vehicle Model	Percentage of Aggregate     Amount Financed
Silverado		12.31%
Cruze		4.84%
Equinox		4.33%
Malibu		3.48%
Sierra		3.47%
Ram Pickup		2.73%
Sonic		2.17%
Grand Cherokee		2.16%
Camaro		2.06%
Impala		1.77%

No other model accounts for more than 1.71% of the Aggregate Amount Financed in the AART 2016-3 pool of receivables.

AART 2018-1
Vehicle Model	Percentage of Aggregate     Amount Financed
Silverado		11.31%
Sierra		4.63%
Ram Pickup		4.57%
Equinox		3.53%
Grand Cherokee		2.96%
Cruze		2.75%
Malibu		2.59%
Wrangler		2.18%
Express		1.93%
Traverse		1.80%

No other model accounts for more than 1.51% of the Aggregate Amount Financed in the AART 2018-1 pool of receivables.

A-52

ALLY AUTO RECEIVABLES TRUST 2017-1

Initial Aggregate Amount Financed: $1,116,603,712.29

		Net Loss Statistics
		Total for Month					Cumulative
Month	Prepayment Speeds	$		%			$		%
Jan-17	1.16		—		0.000000	%		—		0.000000	%
Feb-17	1.09		22,040.26		0.001974	%		22,040.26		0.001974	%
Mar-17	1.43		122,942.22		0.011010	%		144,982.48		0.012984	%
Apr-17	1.13		160,837.11		0.014404	%		305,819.59		0.027388	%
May-17	1.38		314,362.52		0.028153	%		620,182.11		0.055542	%
Jun-17	1.28		259,946.71		0.023280	%		880,128.82		0.078822	%
Jul-17	1.32		321,357.13		0.028780	%		1,201,485.95		0.107602	%
Aug-17	1.36		446,124.81		0.039954	%		1,647,610.76		0.147556	%
Sep-17	1.16		447,163.39		0.040047	%		2,094,774.15		0.187602	%
Oct-17	1.34		378,092.59		0.033861	%		2,472,866.74		0.221463	%
Nov-17	1.16		285,793.17		0.025595	%		2,758,659.91		0.247058	%

A-53

AART 2017-1 Delinquency Data

	Units				$						% 61+ days   delinquent
Month	31-60	61-90	91-120	121+	31-60	61-90	91-120		121+
Jan-17	328	6	—	—	5,366,833.01	85,627.29		—		—	0.007934%
Feb-17	317	52	1	—	5,561,889.67	871,887.47		9,438.55		—	0.084443%
Mar-17	315	40	15	—	5,307,718.07	689,965.07		286,288.85		—	0.097351%
Apr-17	344	68	10	—	5,516,951.47	1,254,562.11		103,112.31		—	0.140285%
May-17	411	56	17	—	6,967,407.37	877,436.56		355,147.17		—	0.132599%
Jun-17	393	83	17	—	6,305,823.88	1,377,301.53		259,672.71		—	0.183148%
Jul-17	455	91	17	—	7,330,386.47	1,375,413.99		240,725.76		—	0.188321%
Aug-17	436	107	30	—	6,758,299.74	1,792,935.05		453,160.50		—	0.272938%
Sep-17	534	100	34	—	8,268,713.38	1,420,591.32		562,818.51		—	0.250627%
Oct-17	524	130	26	—	7,735,736.00	1,927,386.49		333,879.14		—	0.298342%
Nov-17	542	120	31	—	8,236,716.65	1,744,680.27		362,187.60		—	0.289440%

A-54

Initial Receivables Pool Characteristics

	AART 2017-1		AART 2018-1
Weighted Average APR		5.26%		5.88%
Aggregate Amount Financed		$1,116,603,712.29	$	1,119,773,433.38
Number of Contracts in Pool		69,007		69,471
Average Amount Financed		$16,181.02	$	16,118.57
Weighted Average Original Maturity (in Months)		66.01		66.13
Weighted Average Remaining Maturity (in Months)		52.81		52.68
Percentage of Receivables with Original Maturities > 60 Months		68.12%		67.25%
Percentage of New Vehicles		70.08%		70.02%
Percentage of Non-Subvented Receivables		93.62%		97.50%
Weighted Average FICO Score		740.16		737.09
Weighted Average Loan-to-Value		94.40		94.21
Cutoff Date		January 1, 2017		January 1, 2018

Distribution of the Initial Receivables Pool by Annual Percentage Rate

	AART 2017-1							AART 2018-1
Annual Percentage Rate Range	Number of Contracts		Aggregate Amount Financed		Percentage of Aggregate Amount Financed			Number of Contracts		Aggregate Amount Financed		Percentage of Aggregate Amount Financed
0.00% to 1.00%		3,823	$	59,313,082.00		5.31	%		2,188	$	24,002,778.51		2.14	%
1.01% to 2.00%		601	$	7,948,252.75		0.71	%		283	$	3,487,239.11		0.31	%
2.01% to 3.00%		10,060	$	166,836,366.98		14.94	%		8,161	$	142,123,125.14		12.69	%
3.01% to 4.00%		11,371	$	193,938,036.49		17.37	%		11,841	$	203,436,277.26		18.17	%
4.01% to 5.00%		10,632	$	170,677,213.05		15.29	%		10,786	$	174,599,348.76		15.59	%
5.01% to 6.00%		9,615	$	162,468,380.36		14.55	%		9,820	$	159,982,516.73		14.29	%
6.01% to 7.00%		8,420	$	142,613,077.87		12.77	%		7,670	$	126,850,724.30		11.33	%
7.01% to 8.00%		5,763	$	88,589,830.34		7.93	%		6,197	$	96,679,202.21		8.63	%
8.01% to 9.00%		3,706	$	56,831,627.13		5.09	%		4,461	$	70,886,858.80		6.33	%
9.01% to 10.00%		2,361	$	33,693,996.14		3.02	%		3,125	$	47,951,310.77		4.28	%
10.01% to 11.00%		1,315	$	18,130,445.71		1.62	%		2,133	$	32,280,059.54		2.88	%
11.01% to 12.00%		732	$	9,369,568.58		0.84	%		1,384	$	19,947,211.10		1.78	%
12.01% to 13.00%		377	$	4,106,142.17		0.37	%		758	$	9,879,786.59		0.88	%
13.01% to 14.00%		155	$	1,419,901.53		0.13	%		386	$	4,757,178.45		0.42	%
14.01% to 15.00%		55	$	470,647.78		0.04	%		179	$	1,962,216.15		0.18	%
15.01% to 16.00%		16	$	146,598.44		0.01	%		67	$	661,653.00		0.06	%
16.01% to 17.00%		5	$	50,544.97		0.00	%		27	$	240,694.10		0.02	%
17.01% to 18.00%		—	$	—		—	%		5	$	45,352.86		0.00	%
18.01% to 19.00%		—	$	—		—	%		—	$	—		—%
Total		69,007	$	1,116,603,712.29		100.00	%		69,471	$	1,119,773,433.38		100.00	%

A-55

Distribution of the Initial Receivables Pool by State

The following table sets forth the percentage of the Aggregate Amount Financed in the states with the largest concentration of receivables for each of these pools. The following breakdown by state is based on the billing addresses of the obligors on the initial receivables:

AART 2017-1
State	Percentage of Aggregate     Amount Financed
Texas	12.85%
California	9.73%
Florida	8.32%
Pennsylvania	5.48%
Illinois	4.99%
Georgia	3.56%

The AART 2017-1 pool of receivables includes receivables originated in all 50 states and the District of Columbia. No other state accounts for more than 3.50% of the Aggregate Amount Financed for the AART 2017-1 pool of receivables.

AART 2018-1
State	Percentage of Aggregate     Amount Financed
Texas	13.50%
California	9.48%
Florida	9.28%
Pennsylvania	4.57%
Illinois	4.28%
Georgia	4.16%

The AART 2018-1 pool of receivables includes receivables originated in all 50 states and the District of Columbia. No other state accounts for more than 3.78% of the Aggregate Amount Financed for the AART 2018-1 pool of receivables.

Distribution of the Initial Receivables Pool by Vehicle Make

AART 2017-1
Vehicle Make	Percentage of Aggregate     Amount Financed
Chevrolet	36.83%
GMC	8.77%
Ford	7.19%
Jeep	6.39%
Ram	4.57%
Nissan	4.41%
Dodge	4.34%
Hyundai	3.48%
Buick	3.37%
Mitsubishi	3.18%

No other make accounts for more than 3.16% of the Aggregate Amount Financed in the AART 2017-1 pool of receivables.

AART 2018-1
Vehicle Make	Percentage of Aggregate     Amount Financed
Chevrolet	33.35%
GMC	9.42%
Ford	8.40%
Jeep	7.59%
Ram	6.02%
Nissan	4.20%
Dodge	4.08%
Kia	3.64%
Toyota	3.60%
Hyundai	3.28%

No other make accounts for more than 2.97% of the Aggregate Amount Financed in the AART 2018-1 pool of receivables.

A-56

Distribution of the Initial Receivables Pool by Vehicle Model

AART 2017-1
Vehicle Model	Percentage of Aggregate     Amount Financed
Silverado	12.74%
Sierra	4.20%
Equinox	3.58%
Ram Pickup	3.57%
Cruze	2.94%
Malibu	2.90%
Grand Cherokee	2.37%
Wrangler	1.91%
Traverse	1.68%
Camaro	1.60%

No other model accounts for more than 1.59% of the Aggregate Amount Financed in the AART 2017-1 pool of receivables.

AART 2018-1
Vehicle Model	Percentage of Aggregate     Amount Financed
Silverado	11.31%
Sierra	4.63%
Ram Pickup	4.57%
Equinox	3.53%
Grand Cherokee	2.96%
Cruze	2.75%
Malibu	2.59%
Wrangler	2.18%
Express	1.93%
Traverse	1.80%

No other model accounts for more than 1.51% of the Aggregate Amount Financed in the AART 2018-1 pool of receivables.

A-57

ALLY AUTO RECEIVABLES ASSET TRUST 2017-2

Initial Aggregate Amount Financed: $1,019,852,295.52

		Net Loss Statistics
		Total for Month					Cumulative
Month	Prepayment Speeds	$		%			$		%
Mar-17	1.42		639.71		0.000063	%		639.71		0.000063	%
Apr-17	1.14		80,417.96		0.007885	%		81,057.67		0.007948	%
May-17	1.42		110,440.20		0.010829	%		191,497.87		0.018777	%
Jun-17	1.31		225,605.05		0.022121	%		417,102.92		0.040898	%
Jul-17	1.19		261,249.75		0.025616	%		678,352.67		0.066515	%
Aug-17	1.32		267,273.40		0.026207	%		945,626.07		0.092722	%
Sep-17	1.12		288,787.71		0.028317	%		1,234,413.78		0.121038	%
Oct-17	1.32		399,968.55		0.039218	%		1,634,382.33		0.160257	%
Nov-17	1.19		493,602.77		0.048399	%		2,127,985.10		0.208656	%

A-58

AART 2017-2: Delinquency Data

	Units								$								% 61+ days delinquent
Month	31-60		61-90		91-120		121+		31-60		61-90		91-120		121+
Mar-17		226		4		—		1		3,447,750.69		73,904.83		—		30,963.91		0.010698	%
Apr-17		289		63		1		—		4,667,432.30		755,659.58		15,986.85		—		0.081586	%
May-17		312		43		19		—		5,048,807.57		670,508.76		170,264.07		—		0.092618	%
Jun-17		367		57		14		—		5,777,992.76		986,599.89		209,524.49		—		0.137124	%
Jul-17		416		82		12		—		6,166,018.66		1,386,412.05		198,579.91		—		0.188890	%
Aug-17		392		90		23		—		5,733,661.73		1,332,297.12		334,917.11		—		0.207090	%
Sep-17		479		95		33		—		6,957,194.22		1,306,623.28		463,104.15		—		0.228494	%
Oct-17		475		108		29		1		6,584,975.80		1,552,011.07		334,458.00		12,909.60		0.255949	%
Nov-17		517		117		29		1		7,229,136.53		1,561,900.11		383,666.40		12,909.60		0.274920	%

A-59

Initial Receivables Pool Characteristics

	AART 2017-2		AART 2018-1
Weighted Average APR		5.39%		5.88%
Aggregate Amount Financed		$1,019,852,295.52	$	1,119,773,433.38
Number of Contracts in Pool		67,771		69,471
Average Amount Financed		15,048.51	$	16,118.57
Weighted Average Original Maturity (in Months)		65.45		66.13
Weighted Average Remaining Maturity (in Months)		52.20		52.68
Percentage of Receivables with Original Maturities > 60 Months		65.46%		67.25%
Percentage of New Vehicles		70.00%		70.02%
Percentage of Non-Subvented Receivables		94.51%		97.50%
Weighted Average FICO Score		739		737.09
Weighted Average Loan-to-Value		93.30		94.21
Cutoff Date		March 1, 2017		January 1, 2018

Distribution of the Initial Receivables Pool by Annual Percentage Rate

	AART 2017-2							AART 2018-1
Annual Percentage Rate Range	Number of   Contracts		Aggregate Amount Financed		Percentage of Aggregate Amount Financed			Number of Contracts		Aggregate Amount Financed		Percentage of Aggregate Amount Financed
00.00% to 01.00%		3,615	$	47,008,375.53		4.61	%		2,188	$	24,002,778.51		2.14	%
01.01% to 02.00%		618	$	6,808,411.49		0.67	%		283	$	3,487,239.11		0.31	%
02.01% to 03.00%		9,542	$	148,661,154.36		14.58	%		8,161	$	142,123,125.14		12.69	%
03.01% to 04.00%		11,239	$	175,886,042.61		17.25	%		11,841	$	203,436,277.26		18.17	%
04.01% to 05.00%		10,719	$	159,623,271.52		15.65	%		10,786	$	174,599,348.76		15.59	%
05.01% to 06.00%		9,373	$	146,485,956.06		14.36	%		9,820	$	159,982,516.73		14.29	%
06.01% to 07.00%		8,064	$	130,246,393.94		12.77	%		7,670	$	126,850,724.30		11.33	%
07.01% to 08.00%		5,638	$	80,766,224.51		7.92	%		6,197	$	96,679,202.21		8.63	%
08.01% to 09.00%		3,630	$	53,288,068.28		5.23	%		4,461	$	70,886,858.80		6.33	%
09.01% to 10.00%		2,449	$	34,733,652.09		3.41	%		3,125	$	47,951,310.77		4.28	%
10.01% to 11.00%		1,394	$	18,835,440.68		1.85	%		2,133	$	32,280,059.54		2.88	%
11.01% to 12.00%		835	$	10,660,277.66		1.05	%		1,384	$	19,947,211.10		1.78	%
12.01% to 13.00%		418	$	4,648,289.82		0.46	%		758	$	9,879,786.59		0.88	%
13.01% to 14.00%		154	$	1,513,457.13		0.15	%		386	$	4,757,178.45		0.42	%
14.01% to 15.00%		61	$	502,175.36		0.05	%		179	$	1,962,216.15		0.18	%
15.01% to 16.00%		17	$	150,371.85		0.01	%		67	$	661,653.00		0.06	%
16.01% to 17.00%		5	$	34,732.63		0.00	%		27	$	240,694.10		0.02	%
17.01% to 18.00%		—	$	—		—	%		5	$	45,352.86		0.00	%
18.01% to 19.00%		—	$	—		—	%		—	$	—		—%
Total		67,771	$	1,019,852,295.52		100.00	%		69,471	$	1,119,773,433.38		100.00	%

A-60

Distribution of the Initial Receivables Pool by State

The following table sets forth the percentage of the Aggregate Amount Financed in the states with the largest concentration of receivables for each of these pools. The following breakdown by state is based on the billing addresses of the obligors on the initial receivables:

AART 2017-2
State	Percentage of Aggregate     Amount Financed
Texas		12.45%
California		9.25%
Florida		8.77%
Pennsylvania		5.44%
Illinois		5.01%
Georgia		3.52%

The AART 2017-2 pool of receivables includes receivables originated in all 50 states and the District of Columbia. No other state accounts for more than 3.37% of the Aggregate Amount Financed for the AART 2017-2 pool of receivables.

AART 2018-1
State	Percentage of Aggregate     Amount Financed
Texas		13.50	%
California		9.48	%
Florida		9.28	%
Pennsylvania		4.57	%
Illinois		4.28	%
Georgia		4.16	%

The AART 2018-1 pool of receivables includes receivables originated in all 50 states and the District of Columbia. No other state accounts for more than 3.78% of the Aggregate Amount Financed for the AART 2018-1 pool of receivables.

Distribution of the Initial Receivables Pool by Vehicle Make

AART 2017-2
Vehicle Make	Percentage of Aggregate     Amount Financed
Chevrolet		35.27%
GMC		8.60%
Ford		7.38%
Jeep		6.67%
Ram		4.76%
Nissan		4.74%
Dodge		4.58%
Kia		3.48%
Hyundai		3.38%
Mitsubishi		3.38%

No other make accounts for more than 3.15% of the Aggregate Amount Financed in the AART 2017-2 pool of receivables.

AART 2018-1
Vehicle Make	Percentage of Aggregate     Amount Financed
Chevrolet		33.35%
GMC		9.42%
Ford		8.40%
Jeep		7.59%
Ram		6.02%
Nissan		4.20%
Dodge		4.08%
Kia		3.64%
Toyota		3.60%
Hyundai		3.28%

No other make accounts for more than 2.97% of the Aggregate Amount Financed in the AART 2018-1 pool of receivables.

A-61

Distribution of the Initial Receivables Pool by Vehicle Model

AART 2017-2
Vehicle Model	Percentage of Aggregate     Amount Financed
Silverado		11.45%
Sierra		4.25%
Ram Pickup		3.51%
Equinox		3.47%
Cruze		3.07%
Malibu		2.92%
Grand Cherokee		2.55%
Wrangler		1.82%
Express		1.81%
Colorado		1.71%

No other model accounts for more than 1.53% of the Aggregate Amount Financed in the AART 2017-2 pool of receivables.

AART 2018-1
Vehicle Model	Percentage of Aggregate     Amount Financed
Silverado		11.31%
Sierra		4.63%
Ram Pickup		4.57%
Equinox		3.53%
Grand Cherokee		2.96%
Cruze		2.75%
Malibu		2.59%
Wrangler		2.18%
Express		1.93%
Traverse		1.80%

No other model accounts for more than 1.51% of the Aggregate Amount Financed in the AART 2018-1 pool of receivables.

A-62

ALLY AUTO RECEIVABLES TRUST 2017-3

Initial Aggregate Amount Financed: $1,057,998,087.93

			Net Loss Statistics
			Total for Month				Cumulative
Month	Prepayment Speeds		$		%		$		%
May-17		1.48		—		0.000000%		—		0.000000%
Jun-17		1.25		94,743.62		0.008955%		94,743.62		0.008955%
Jul-17		1.22		119,208.38		0.011267%		213,952.00		0.020222%
Aug-17		1.31		353,508.84		0.033413%		567,460.84		0.053635%
Sep-17		1.21		294,241.56		0.027811%		861,702.40		0.081446%
Oct-17		1.31		382,577.27		0.036160%		1,244,279.67		0.117607%
Nov-17		1.18		271,087.69		0.025623%		1,515,367.36		0.143230%

A-63

AART 2017-3: Delinquency Data

	Units								$								% 61+ days delinquent
Month	31-60		61-90		91-120		121+		31-60		61-90		91-120		121+
May-17		302		2		—		—		5,017,882.82		26,593.58		—		—		0.002619%
Jun-17		360		61		1		—		5,708,075.71		966,825.31		9,774.66		—		0.099901%
Jul-17		380		70		23		—		6,229,977.17		1,045,429.69		395,842.59		—		0.153230%
Aug-17		440		87		18		—		6,883,175.07		1,450,870.69		270,574.73		—		0.190595%
Sep-17		522		98		33		—		8,002,353.94		1,469,244.98		486,109.53		—		0.225266%
Oct-17		471		109		28		2		6,964,451.66		1,689,341.95		506,927.62		21,807.25		0.266529%
Nov-17		555		125		24		1		8,378,729.92		1,784,368.50		360,526.98		29,460.49		0.272064%

A-64

Initial Receivables Pool Characteristics

	AART 2017-3		AART 2018-1
Weighted Average APR		5.35%		5.88%
Aggregate Amount Financed		$1,057,998,087.93	$	1,119,773,433.38
Number of Contracts in Pool		67,797		69,471
Average Amount Financed		$15,605.38	$	16,118.57
Weighted Average Original Maturity (in Months)		65.93		66.13
Weighted Average Remaining Maturity (in Months)		51.45		52.68
Percentage of Receivables with Original Maturities > 60 Months		66.06%		67.25%
Percentage of New Vehicles		70.00%		70.02%
Percentage of Non-Subvented Receivables		95.11%		97.50%
Weighted Average FICO Score		738.00		737.09
Weighted Average Loan-to-Value		93.94		94.21
Cutoff Date		May 1, 2017		January 1, 2018

Distribution of the Initial Receivables Pool by Annual Percentage Rate

	AART 2017-3							AART 2018-1
Annual Percentage Rate Range	Number of Contracts		Aggregate Amount Financed			Percentage of Aggregate Amount Financed		Number of Contracts		Aggregate Amount Financed			Percentage of Aggregate Amount Financed
00.00% to 01.00%		3,454		$	42,599,335.34		4.03%		2,188		$	24,002,778.51		2.14%
01.01% to 02.00%		543		$	6,776,989.21		0.64%		283		$	3,487,239.11		0.31%
02.01% to 03.00%		9,642		$	164,437,379.90		15.54%		8,161		$	142,123,125.14		12.69%
03.01% to 04.00%		12,078		$	198,958,864.30		18.81%		11,841		$	203,436,277.26		18.17%
04.01% to 05.00%		10,948		$	171,056,783.65		16.17%		10,786		$	174,599,348.76		15.59%
05.01% to 06.00%		9,204		$	146,648,355.37		13.86%		9,820		$	159,982,516.73		14.29%
06.01% to 07.00%		7,449		$	118,720,536.62		11.22%		7,670		$	126,850,724.30		11.33%
07.01% to 08.00%		5,399		$	79,205,928.27		7.49%		6,197		$	96,679,202.21		8.63%
08.01% to 09.00%		3,497		$	53,512,796.98		5.06%		4,461		$	70,886,858.80		6.33%
09.01% to 10.00%		2,417		$	34,518,310.37		3.26%		3,125		$	47,951,310.77		4.28%
10.01% to 11.00%		1,509		$	21,301,597.94		2.01%		2,133		$	32,280,059.54		2.88%
11.01% to 12.00%		934		$	12,369,595.13		1.17%		1,384		$	19,947,211.10		1.78%
12.01% to 13.00%		438		$	5,272,649.76		0.50%		758		$	9,879,786.59		0.88%
13.01% to 14.00%		179		$	1,717,776.12		0.16%		386		$	4,757,178.45		0.42%
14.01% to 15.00%		68		$	636,880.47		0.06%		179		$	1,962,216.15		0.18%
15.01% to 16.00%		23		$	160,948.29		0.02%		67		$	661,653.00		0.06%
16.01% to 17.00%		13		$	90,946.69		0.01%		27		$	240,694.10		0.02%
17.01% to 18.00%		2		$	12,413.52		0.00%		5		$	45,352.86		0.00%
18.01% to 19.00%		—		$	—		—%		—		$	—		—%
Total		67,797		$	1,057,998,087.93		100.00%		69,471		$	1,119,773,433.38		100.00%

A-65

Distribution of the Initial Receivables Pool by State

The following table sets forth the percentage of the Aggregate Amount Financed in the states with the largest concentration of receivables for each of these pools. The following breakdown by state is based on the billing addresses of the obligors on the initial receivables:

AART 2017-3
State	Percentage of Aggregate     Amount Financed
Texas		12.66%
California		9.19%
Florida		8.52%
Pennsylvania		5.13%
Illinois		5.06%
North Carolina		3.62%

The AART 2017-3 pool of receivables includes receivables originated in all 50 states and the District of Columbia. No other state accounts for more than 3.51% of the Aggregate Amount Financed for the AART 2017-3 pool of receivables.

AART 2018-1
State	Percentage of Aggregate     Amount Financed
Texas		13.50	%
California		9.48	%
Florida		9.28	%
Pennsylvania		4.57	%
Illinois		4.28	%
Georgia		4.16	%

The AART 2018-1 pool of receivables includes receivables originated in all 50 states and the District of Columbia. No other state accounts for more than 3.78% of the Aggregate Amount Financed for the AART 2018-1 pool of receivables.

Distribution of the Initial Receivables Pool by Vehicle Make

AART 2017-3
Vehicle Make	Percentage of Aggregate     Amount Financed
Chevrolet		35.65%
GMC		9.40%
Ford		7.53%
Jeep		7.00%
RAM		5.29%
Dodge		4.51%
Nissan		4.27%
Buick		3.20%
Hyundai		3.13%
Kia		3.03%

No other make accounts for more than 2.94% of the Aggregate Amount Financed in the AART 2017-3 pool of receivables.

AART 2018-1
Vehicle Make	Percentage of Aggregate     Amount Financed
Chevrolet		33.35%
GMC		9.42%
Ford		8.40%
Jeep		7.59%
Ram		6.02%
Nissan		4.20%
Dodge		4.08%
Kia		3.64%
Toyota		3.60%
Hyundai		3.28%

No other make accounts for more than 2.97% of the Aggregate Amount Financed in the AART 2018-1 pool of receivables.

A-66

Distribution of the Initial Receivables Pool by Vehicle Model

AART 2017-3
Vehicle Model	Percentage of Aggregate     Amount Financed
Silverado		12.43%
Sierra		4.69%
Ram Pickup		4.09%
Equinox		3.62%
Grand Cherokee		2.74%
Malibu		2.61%
Cruze		2.59%
Wrangler		2.08%
Express		1.93%
Traverse		1.71%

No other model accounts for more than 1.57% of the Aggregate Amount Financed in the AART 2017-3 pool of receivables.

AART 2018-1
Vehicle Model	Percentage of Aggregate Amount Financed
Silverado		11.31%
Sierra		4.63%
Ram Pickup		4.57%
Equinox		3.53%
Grand Cherokee		2.96%
Cruze		2.75%
Malibu		2.59%
Wrangler		2.18%
Express		1.93%
Traverse		1.80%

No other model accounts for more than 1.51% of the Aggregate Amount Financed in the AART 2018-1 pool of receivables.

A-67

ALLY AUTO RECEIVABLES TRUST 2017-4

Initial Aggregate Amount Financed $1,107,866,076.72

			Net Loss Statistics
			Total for Month				Cumulative
Month	Prepayment Speeds		$		%		$		%
Aug-17		1.30		8,398.51		0.000758%		8,398.51		0.000758%
Sep-17		1.18		28,939.70		0.002612%		37,338.21		0.003370%
Oct-17		1.30		90,246.33		0.008146%		127,584.54		0.011516%
Nov-17		1.21		285,736.08		0.025792%		413,320.62		0.037308%

A-68

AART 2017-4: Delinquency Data

	Units								$								% 61+ days delinquent
Month	31-60		61-90		91-120		121+		31-60		61-90		91-120		121+
Aug-17		306		12		—		—		5,136,308.43		196,330.09		—		—		0.018387%
Sep-17		420		78		4		—		6,803,743.27		1,335,829.77		48,603.80		—		0.134381%
Oct-17		450		78		19		—		7,158,022.76		1,349,517.70		316,923.52		—		0.168109%
Nov-17		478		96		20		—		7,688,479.55		1,712,756.20		343,358.98		—		0.215390%

A-69

Initial Receivables Pool Characteristics

	AART 2017-4		AART 2018-1
Weighted Average APR		5.61%		5.88%
Aggregate Amount Financed		$1,107,866,076.72	$	1,119,773,433.38
Number of Contracts in Pool		70,003		69,471
Average Amount Financed		$15,825.98	$	16,118.57
Weighted Average Original Maturity (in Months)		65.59		66.13
Weighted Average Remaining Maturity (in Months)		52.30		52.68
Percentage of Receivables with Original Maturities > 60 Months		65.52%		67.25%
Percentage of New Vehicles		70.00%		70.02%
Percentage of Non-Subvented Receivables		96.38%		97.50%
Weighted Average FICO Score		737.04		737.09
Weighted Average Loan-to-Value		93.29		94.21
Cutoff Date		August 1, 2017		January 1, 2018

Distribution of the Initial Receivables Pool by Annual Percentage Rate

	AART 2017-4						AART 2018-1
Annual Percentage Rate Range	Number of Contracts		Aggregate Amount Financed		Percentage of Aggregate Amount Financed		Number of Contracts		Aggregate Amount Financed		Percentage of Aggregate Amount Financed
0.00% to 1.00%		2,804	$	34,183,530.40		3.09%		2,188	$	24,002,778.51		2.14%
1.01% to 2.00%		391	$	5,209,679.14		0.47%		283	$	3,487,239.11		0.31%
2.01% to 3.00%		9,440	$	162,516,580.78		14.67%		8,161	$	142,123,125.14		12.69%
3.01% to 4.00%		11,838	$	197,172,208.69		17.80%		11,841	$	203,436,277.26		18.17%
4.01% to 5.00%		10,841	$	172,252,875.43		15.55%		10,786	$	174,599,348.76		15.59%
5.01% to 6.00%		9,658	$	155,783,455.43		14.06%		9,820	$	159,982,516.73		14.29%
6.01% to 7.00%		7,724	$	125,186,240.11		11.30%		7,670	$	126,850,724.30		11.33%
7.01% to 8.00%		6,106	$	93,793,981.01		8.47%		6,197	$	96,679,202.21		8.63%
8.01% to 9.00%		4,256	$	65,572,865.12		5.92%		4,461	$	70,886,858.80		6.33%
9.01% to 10.00%		2,936	$	43,258,649.32		3.90%		3,125	$	47,951,310.77		4.28%
10.01% to 11.00%		1,778	$	25,390,342.22		2.29%		2,133	$	32,280,059.54		2.88%
11.01% to 12.00%		1,191	$	15,779,204.33		1.42%		1,384	$	19,947,211.10		1.78%
12.01% to 13.00%		591	$	7,215,720.69		0.65%		758	$	9,879,786.59		0.88%
13.01% to 14.00%		291	$	3,122,785.34		0.28%		386	$	4,757,178.45		0.42%
14.01% to 15.00%		108	$	1,001,433.20		0.09%		179	$	1,962,216.15		0.18%
15.01% to 16.00%		36	$	321,360.62		0.03%		67	$	661,653.00		0.06%
16.01% to 17.00%		11	$	87,438.66		0.01%		27	$	240,694.10		0.02%
17.01% to 18.00%		—	$	—		0.00%		5	$	45,352.86		0.00%
18.01% to 19.00%		2	$	12,118.18		0.00%		—	$	—		—%
19.01% to 20.00%		1	$	5,608.05		0.00%		—	$	—		—%
Total		70,003	$	1,107,866,076.72		100.00%		69,471	$	1,119,773,433.38		100.00%

A-70

Distribution of the Initial Receivables Pool by State

The following table sets forth the percentage of the Aggregate Amount Financed in the states with the largest concentration of receivables for each of these pools. The following breakdown by state is based on the billing addresses of the obligors on the initial receivables:

AART 2017-4
State	Percentage of Aggregate     Amount Financed
Texas		12.69%
California		9.56%
Florida		8.35%
Illinois		4.89%
Pennsylvania		4.84%
Missouri		3.61%

The AART 2017-4 pool of receivables includes receivables originated in all 50 states and the District of Columbia. No other state accounts for more than 3.50% of the Aggregate Amount Financed for the AART 2017-4 pool of receivables.

AART 2018-1
State	Percentage of Aggregate     Amount Financed
Texas		13.50	%
California		9.48	%
Florida		9.28	%
Pennsylvania		4.57	%
Illinois		4.28	%
Georgia		4.16	%

The AART 2018-1 pool of receivables includes receivables originated in all 50 states and the District of Columbia. No other state accounts for more than 3.78% of the Aggregate Amount Financed for the AART 2018-1 pool of receivables.

Distribution of the Initial Receivables Pool by Vehicle Make

AART 2017-4
Vehicle Make	Percentage of Aggregate     Amount Financed
Chevrolet		33.19%
GMC		9.45%
Ford		8.14%
Jeep		7.23%
Ram		5.62%
Dodge		4.46%
Nissan		4.41%
Kia		3.48%
Hyundai		3.46%
Toyota		3.23%

No other make accounts for more than 3.02% of the Aggregate Amount Financed in the AART 2017-4 pool of receivables.

AART 2018-1
Vehicle Make	Percentage of Aggregate     Amount Financed
Chevrolet		33.35%
GMC		9.42%
Ford		8.40%
Jeep		7.59%
Ram		6.02%
Nissan		4.20%
Dodge		4.08%
Kia		3.64%
Toyota		3.60%
Hyundai		3.28%

No other make accounts for more than 2.97% of the Aggregate Amount Financed in the AART 2018-1 pool of receivables.

A-71

Distribution of the Initial Receivables Pool by Vehicle Model

AART 2017-4
Vehicle Model	Percentage of Aggregate     Amount Financed
Silverado		11.24%
Sierra		4.66%
Ram Pickup		4.22%
Equinox		3.27%
Grand Cherokee		2.94%
Malibu		2.56%
Cruze		2.56%
Wrangler		2.07%
Express		1.94%
Colorado		1.67%

No other model accounts for more than 1.47% of the Aggregate Amount Financed in the AART 2017-4 pool of receivables.

AART 2018-1
Vehicle Model	Percentage of Aggregate     Amount Financed
Silverado		11.31%
Sierra		4.63%
Ram Pickup		4.57%
Equinox		3.53%
Grand Cherokee		2.96%
Cruze		2.75%
Malibu		2.59%
Wrangler		2.18%
Express		1.93%
Traverse		1.80%

No other model accounts for more than 1.51% of the Aggregate Amount Financed in the AART 2018-1 pool of receivables.

A-72

ALLY AUTO RECEIVABLES TRUST 2017-5

Initial Aggregate Amount Financed $559,999,919.78

		Net Loss Statistics
		Total for Month					Cumulative
Month	Prepayment Speeds	$		%			$		%
Nov-17	1.13		21,837.41		0.003900	%		21,837.41		0.003900%

A-73

AART 2017-5: Delinquency Data

Month	Units				$						% 61+days     delinquent
	31-60	61-90	91-120	121+	31-60	61-90	91-120		121+
Nov-17	227	35	—	—	3,673,934.23	652,374.35		—		—	0.125051%

A-74

Initial Receivables Pool Characteristics

	AART 2017-5	AART 2018-1
Weighted Average APR	5.72%		5.88%
Aggregate Amount Financed	$559,999,919.78	$	1,119,773,433.38
Number of Contracts in Pool	35,136		69,471
Average Amount Financed	$15,938.07	$	16,118.57
Weighted Average Original Maturity (in Months)	65.97		66.13
Weighted Average Remaining Maturity (in Months)	52.59		52.68
Percentage of Receivables with Original Maturities > 60 Months	66.98%		67.25%
Percentage of New Vehicles	70.00%		70.02%
Percentage of Non-Subvented Receivables	96.36%		97.50%
Weighted Average FICO Score	737.00		737.09
Weighted Average Loan-to-Value	93.69		94.21
Cutoff Date	October 1, 2017		January 1, 2018

Distribution of the Initial Receivables Pool by Annual Percentage Rate

Annual Percentage Rate Range	AART 2017-5						AART 2018-1
	Number of   Contracts		Aggregate Amount       Financed		Percentage of Aggregate Amount     Financed		Number of     Contracts		Aggregate Amount         Financed		Percentage of Aggregate Amount     Financed
0.00% to 1.00%		1,471	$	17,047,616.52		3.04%		2,188	$	24,002,778.51		2.14%
1.01% to 2.00%		187	$	2,347,335.92		0.42%		283	$	3,487,239.11		0.31%
2.01% to 3.00%		4,540	$	76,737,261.01		13.70%		8,161	$	142,123,125.14		12.69%
3.01% to 4.00%		5,943	$	98,383,521.80		17.57%		11,841	$	203,436,277.26		18.17%
4.01% to 5.00%		5,494	$	87,482,051.38		15.62%		10,786	$	174,599,348.76		15.59%
5.01% to 6.00%		4,837	$	79,887,965.49		14.27%		9,820	$	159,982,516.73		14.29%
6.01% to 7.00%		3,906	$	65,184,641.30		11.64%		7,670	$	126,850,724.30		11.33%
7.01% to 8.00%		3,125	$	50,333,721.44		8.99%		6,197	$	96,679,202.21		8.63%
8.01% to 9.00%		2,114	$	33,844,523.15		6.04%		4,461	$	70,886,858.80		6.33%
9.01% to 10.00%		1,305	$	18,908,790.85		3.38%		3,125	$	47,951,310.77		4.28%
10.01% to 11.00%		931	$	13,586,857.82		2.43%		2,133	$	32,280,059.54		2.88%
11.01% to 12.00%		635	$	8,527,628.47		1.52%		1,384	$	19,947,211.10		1.78%
12.01% to 13.00%		343	$	4,449,459.29		0.79%		758	$	9,879,786.59		0.88%
13.01% to 14.00%		178	$	2,074,413.23		0.37%		386	$	4,757,178.45		0.42%
14.01% to 15.00%		81	$	813,377.20		0.15%		179	$	1,962,216.15		0.18%
15.01% to 16.00%		32	$	270,899.75		0.05%		67	$	661,653.00		0.06%
16.01% to 17.00%		11	$	99,410.28		0.02%		27	$	240,694.10		0.02%
17.01% to 18.00%		1	$	7,640.81		0.00%		5	$	45,352.86		0.00%
18.01% to 19.00%		2	$	12,804.07		0.00%		—	$	—		—%
19.01% to 20.00%		—	$	—		—%		—	$	—		—%
Total		35,136	$	559,999,919.78		100.00%		69,471	$	1,119,773,433.38		100.00%

A-75

Distribution of the Initial Receivables Pool by State

The following table sets forth the percentage of the Aggregate Amount Financed in the states with the largest concentration of receivables for each of these pools. The following breakdown by state is based on the billing addresses of the obligors on the initial receivables:

AART 2017-5
State	Percentage of Aggregate   Amount Financed
California		11.75	%
Texas		9.77	%
Pennsylvania		5.81	%
Illinois		5.51	%
North Carolina		4.32	%
Missouri		4.26	%

The AART 2017-5 pool of receivables includes receivables originated in all 50 states and the District of Columbia. No other state accounts for more than 4.04% of the Aggregate Amount Financed for the AART 2017-5 pool of receivables.

AART 2018-1
State	Percentage of Aggregate   Amount Financed
Texas		13.50	%
California		9.48	%
Florida		9.28	%
Pennsylvania		4.57	%
Illinois		4.28	%
Georgia		4.16	%

The AART 2018-1 pool of receivables includes receivables originated in all 50 states and the District of Columbia. No other state accounts for more than 3.78% of the Aggregate Amount Financed for the AART 2018-1 pool of receivables.

Distribution of the Initial Receivables Pool by Vehicle Make

AART 2017-5
Vehicle Make	Percentage of Aggregate   Amount Financed
Chevrolet		33.75	%
GMC		9.34	%
Ford		8.20	%
Jeep		7.47	%
Ram		5.85	%
Dodge		4.31	%
Nissan		4.16	%
Kia		3.55	%
Toyota		3.30	%
Hyundai		3.20	%

No other make accounts for more than 2.99% of the Aggregate Amount Financed in the AART 2017-5 pool of receivables.

AART 2018-1
Vehicle Make	Percentage of Aggregate   Amount Financed
Chevrolet		33.35	%
GMC		9.42	%
Ford		8.40	%
Jeep		7.59	%
Ram		6.02	%
Nissan		4.20	%
Dodge		4.08	%
Kia		3.64	%
Toyota		3.60	%
Hyundai		3.28	%

No other make accounts for more than 2.97% of the Aggregate Amount Financed in the AART 2018-1 pool of receivables.

A-76

Distribution of the Initial Receivables Pool by Vehicle Model

AART 2017-5
Vehicle Model	Percentage of Aggregate   Amount Financed
Silverado		11.37	%
Sierra		4.52	%
Ram Pickup		4.38	%
Equinox		3.61	%
Grand Cherokee		2.81	%
Cruze		2.71	%
Malibu		2.71	%
Wrangler		2.22	%
Express		1.84	%
Traverse		1.78	%

No other model accounts for more than 1.67% of the Aggregate Amount Financed in the AART 2017-5 pool of receivables.

AART 2018-1
Vehicle Model	Percentage of Aggregate   Amount Financed
Silverado		11.31	%
Sierra		4.63	%
Ram Pickup		4.57	%
Equinox		3.53	%
Grand Cherokee		2.96	%
Cruze		2.75	%
Malibu		2.59	%
Wrangler		2.18	%
Express		1.93	%
Traverse		1.80	%

No other model accounts for more than 1.51% of the Aggregate Amount Financed in the AART 2018-1 pool of receivables.

A-77

Prepayment Speeds, 2013-2017 Public Securitizations

The chart below shows Prepayment Speed for each of the sponsor’s public securitizations in 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016 and 2017. The calculation of Prepayment Speed is described on page A-1 of this Appendix A.

A-78

Cumulative Net Loss, 2013-2017 Public Securitizations

The chart below shows cumulative net loss for each of the sponsor’s public securitizations in 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016 and 2017. The calculation of net loss is described on page A-1 of this Appendix A.

A-79

61+ Day Delinquency Percentage, 2013-2017 Public Securitizations

The chart below shows the 61+ day delinquency percentage for each of the sponsor’s public securitizations in 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016 and 2017. The calculation of the 61+ day delinquency percentage is described on page A-1 of this Appendix A.

A-80

No dealer, salesman or other person has been authorized to give any information or to make any representations not contained in this prospectus and, if given or made, such information or representations must not be relied upon as having been authorized by the depositor, the servicer or the underwriters. This prospectus does not constitute an offer to sell, or a solicitation of an offer to buy, the notes offered hereby to anyone in any jurisdiction in which the person making such offer or solicitation is not qualified to do so or to anyone to whom it is unlawful to make any such offer or solicitation. Neither the delivery of this prospectus nor any sale made hereunder will, under any circumstances, create an implication that information herein or therein is correct as of any time since the date of this prospectus.

Until the expiration of the 90 days after the date of this prospectus, all dealers effecting transactions in the notes whether or not participating in this distribution, may be required to deliver a prospectus. This delivery requirement is in addition to the obligation of dealers to deliver a prospectus when acting as underwriters for their unsold allotments or subscriptions.

Ally Auto Receivables Trust 2018-1

Issuing Entity

$1,057,070,000

Asset Backed Notes,

Class A

$23,520,000

Asset Backed Notes,

Class B

Ally Auto Assets LLC

Depositor

Ally Bank

Sponsor and Servicer

PROSPECTUS

Barclays

Deutsche Bank Securities

J.P. Morgan

Lloyds Securities

Scotiabank

Wells Fargo Securities