SB-2 1 file1.htm

As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 19, 2007.

SEC File No. 333-

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM SB-2

REGISTRATION STATEMENT UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933

TOWERSTREAM CORPORATION
(Name of small business issuer in its charter)

55 Hammarlund Way
Middletown, Rhode Island 02842
(Address and telephone number of principal executive offices)
(Address of principal place of business or intended principal place of business)

Jeffrey M. Thompson
Chief Executive Officer
Towerstream Corporation
55 Hammarlund Way
Middletown, Rhode Island 02842
(401) 848-5848
(Name, address and telephone number of agent for service)

Copies of all communications, including communications sent to agent for service, should be sent to:

Harvey J. Kesner, Esq.
Haynes and Boone, LLP
153 East 53^rd Street
Suite 4900
New York, New York 10022
Tel (212) 659-7300
Fax (212) 918-8989

Approximate date of commencement of proposed sale to the public: As soon as practicable after the effective date of this Registration Statement.

If this Form is filed to register additional securities for an offering pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act, please check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering.

If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(c) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering.

If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(d) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering.

If delivery of the prospectus is expected to be made pursuant to Rule 434, check the following box.

CALCULATION OF REGISTRATION FEE


Title of each class of securities to be registered	Amount to be Registered⁽¹⁾		Proposed maximum aggregate offering price				Amount of registration fee
Common Stock, $.001 par value		6,568,888		$	43,354,660.80	⁽²⁾		$	1,330.99
Common Stock underlying $0.71 Investor Warrants		400,000		$	2,640,000.00	⁽³⁾		$	81.05
Common Stock underlying $4.00 Investor Warrants		636,364		$	4,200,002.40	⁽³⁾		$	128.94
Common Stock underlying $4.50 Investor Warrants		2,555,028		$	16,863,184.80	⁽³⁾		$	517.70
Common Stock underlying $4.50 Placement Agent Warrants		204,553		$	1,350,049.80	⁽³⁾		$	41.45
Common Stock underlying $6.00 Investor Warrants		636,364		$	4,200,002.40	⁽³⁾		$	128.94
Common Stock underlying Debentures		1,272,728		$	8,400,004.80	⁽³⁾		$	257.88
Total		12,273,925		$	81,007,905.00			$	2,486.95


(1)	Pursuant to Rule 416 under the Securities Act, the shares of common stock offered hereby also include an indeterminate number of additional shares of common stock as may from time to time become issuable by reason of stock splits, stock dividends, recapitalizations or other similar transactions.


(2)	With respect to the shares of common stock offered by the selling stockholders named herein, estimated at $6.60 per share, the last sale price of the common stock as reported on the OTC Bulletin Board regulated quotation service on March 16, 2007, for the purpose of calculating the registration fee in accordance with Rule 457(c) under the Securities Act.


(3)	Estimated at $6.60 per share, the last sale price of the common stock as reported on the OTC Bulletin Board regulated quotation service on March 16, 2007, for the purpose of calculating the registration fee in accordance with Rule 457(g)(3) under the Securities Act.

The registrant hereby amends this registration statement on such date or dates as may be necessary to delay its effective date until the registrant shall file a further amendment which specifically states that this registration statement shall thereafter become effective in accordance with Section 8(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 or until the registration statement shall become effective on such date as the Commission, acting pursuant to said Section 8(a), may determine.

The information in this prospectus is not complete and may be changed. We may not sell these securities until the registration statement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission is effective. This prospectus is not an offer to sell these securities and we are not soliciting an offer to buy these securities in any state where the offer or sale is not permitted.

SUBJECT TO COMPLETION, DATED MARCH 19, 2007

PRELIMINARY PROSPECTUS

12,273,925 Shares

Towerstream Corporation

Common Stock

This prospectus relates to the sale by the selling stockholders identified in this prospectus of up to 12,273,925 shares of our common stock, which includes:


•	5,110,056 shares of common stock issued in a private placement;


•	4,227,756 shares of common stock initially issuable upon the exercise of warrants issued in a private placement;


•	1,272,728 shares of common stock initially issuable upon the conversion of debentures issued in a private placement;


•	204,553 shares of common stock initially issuable upon the exercise of warrants issued to various placement agents in connection with our private placements; and


•	1,458,832 shares of common stock that were issued upon the conversion of certain promissory notes.

The prices at which the selling stockholders may sell shares will be determined by the prevailing market price for the shares or in negotiated transactions. We will not receive any proceeds from the sale of these shares by the selling stockholders. However, we will receive the exercise price of the warrants if the warrants are exercised for cash. All expenses of registration incurred in connection with this offering are being borne by us, but all selling and other expenses incurred by the selling stockholders will be borne by the selling stockholders.

Our common stock is quoted on the regulated quotation service of the OTC Bulletin Board under the symbol ‘‘TWER.OB’’. On March 16, 2007, the last reported sale price of our common stock as reported on the OTC Bulletin Board was $6.60 per share.

Investing in our common stock is highly speculative and involves a high degree of risk. You should carefully consider the risks and uncertainties in the section entitled ‘‘Risk Factors’’ beginning on page 3 of this prospectus before making a decision to purchase our stock.

Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission nor any state securities commission has approved or disapproved of these securities or passed upon the adequacy or accuracy of this prospectus. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal offense.

The date of this prospectus is , 2007

TABLE OF CONTENTS


					Page
Prospectus Summary					1
Risk Factors					3
Special Note Regarding Forward Looking Statements					12
Use of Proceeds					12
Market for Our Common Stock and Related Stockholder Matters					13
Dividend Policy					13
Management’s Discussion and Analysis or Plan of Operation					13
Business					20
Management					26
Executive Compensation					29
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions					34
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management					35
Selling Stockholders					36
Description of Securities					44
Plan of Distribution					48
Legal Matters					50
Experts					50
Where You Can Find Additional Information					50
Index to Financial Statements					F-1

You should rely only on the information contained in this prospectus. We have not authorized any other person to provide you with different information. If anyone provides you with different or inconsistent information, you should not rely on it. We are not making an offer to sell these securities in any jurisdiction where an offer or sale is not permitted. You should assume that the information appearing in this prospectus is accurate only as of the date on the front cover of this prospectus. Our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects may have changed since that date.

Table of Contents

PROSPECTUS SUMMARY

The following summary highlights information contained elsewhere in this prospectus. It may not contain all the information that may be important to you. You should read this entire prospectus carefully, including the sections entitled ‘‘Risk Factors’’ and ‘‘Management’s Discussion and Analysis or Plan of Operation,’’ and our historical financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in this prospectus. In this prospectus, unless the context requires otherwise, references to ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘our,’’ or ‘‘us’’ refer to Towerstream Corporation.

Corporate History

We were organized in the State of Nevada on June 2, 2005 as University Girls Calendar, Ltd. On January 4, 2007, University Girls Calendar, Ltd. merged with and into a wholly-owned Delaware subsidiary, for the sole purpose of changing its state of incorporation to Delaware. On January 12, 2007, Towerstream Acquisition, Inc., a newly formed wholly-owned subsidiary of University Girls Calendar, Ltd. merged with and into Towerstream Corporation, a private corporation. Upon closing of the merger Towerstream Corporation became a wholly-owned subsidiary of University Girls Calendar, Ltd., and University Girls Calendar, Ltd. succeeded to Towerstream Corporation’s line of business as its sole line of business. In connection with the merger, Towerstream Corporation changed its name to Towerstream I, Inc. and University Girls Calendar, Ltd. changed its name to Towerstream Corporation.

Overview

We are a leading supplier of fixed, high-speed, wireless broadband services to commercial users, with operations in New York City, Chicago, Los Angeles, Boston, San Francisco, Seattle and the greater Providence, Rhode Island and Newport, Rhode Island metropolitan areas. Our fixed wireless broadband network delivers high-speed Internet access supporting Voice over Internet Protocol, or VoIP, bandwidth on demand, wireless redundancy, virtual private networks, or VPNs, disaster recovery, bundled data, and video services. Furthermore, we offer customers bandwidth connection speeds ranging from the equivalent of a standard T-1 telephone line and up to 1,000 million bits per second.

Our principal executive offices are located at 55 Hammarlund Way, Middletown, Rhode Island 02842, and our telephone number is (410) 858-5848. Our website address is http://www.towerstream.com. Information on or accessed through our website is not incorporated into this prospectus and is not a part of this prospectus.

The Offering


Common stock offered by the selling stockholders:		12,273,925 shares, consisting of 5,110,056 shares issued to investors in a private placement, 1,458,832 shares issued upon the conversion of promissory notes, 1,272,728 shares issuable upon the conversion of outstanding debentures and 4,432,309 shares issuable upon the exercise of outstanding warrants.


Common stock outstanding after this offering:		29,429,987⁽¹⁾


Use of proceeds:		We will not receive any proceeds from the sale of shares in this offering by the selling stockholders. However, we will receive proceeds from the exercise of the warrants if the warrants are exercised for cash.

Table of Contents


OTC Bulletin Board symbol:		TWER.OB


Risk Factors:		You should carefully consider the information set forth in this prospectus and, in particular, the specific factors set forth in the ‘‘Risk Factors’’ section beginning on page 3 of this prospectus before deciding whether or not to invest in shares of our common stock.

(1)

The number of outstanding shares after the offering is based upon 23,724,950 shares outstanding as of March 16, 2007 and assumes both the full conversion of the debentures into shares of common stock and the full exercise of all warrants with respect to which the underlying shares are being registered pursuant to the registration statement of which this prospectus forms a part. Additional shares will be issuable upon conversion of the debentures if we elect to pay interest on these debentures in kind by increasing the principal outstanding under the debentures. See ‘‘Description of Securities — Convertible Debentures.’’

The number of shares of common stock outstanding after this offering excludes:


	•	340,015 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of currently outstanding warrants with exercise prices ranging from $0.71 to $2.14 per share and having a weighted average exercise price of $0.89 per share;


	•	2,083,004 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of currently outstanding options with exercise prices ranging from $0.78 to $2.25 and having a weighted average exercise price of $1.35 per share; and


	•	320,918 shares of common stock available for future issuance under our 2007 Equity Compensation Plan.

Table of Contents

RISK FACTORS

Investing in our common stock involves a high degree of risk. Before investing in our common stock you should carefully consider the following risks, together with the financial and other information contained in this prospectus. If any of the following risks actually occurs, our business, prospects, financial condition and results of operations could be adversely affected. In that case, the trading price of our common stock would likely decline and you may lose all or a part of your investment.

Risks Relating to Our Business

We have a history of operating losses and expect to continue suffering losses for the foreseeable future.

We were formed in 1999 and have incurred losses in each year of operation. Specifically, in each of 2006 and 2005 we recorded net losses of $811,531 and $947,205, respectively. Moreover, as of December 31, 2006, we had an accumulated deficit of $8,213,000. We cannot anticipate when, if ever, our operations will become profitable. We expect to incur significant net losses as we expand our sales force, develop our network, expand our markets, and pursue our business strategy. We intend to invest significantly in our business before we expect cash flow from operations to be adequate to cover our anticipated expenses.

If we are unable to execute our business strategy and grow our business, either as a result of the risks identified in this section or for any other reason, our business, prospects, financial condition and results of operations will be adversely affected.

Our business may require additional capital for continued growth, and our growth may be slowed if we do not have sufficient capital.

The continued growth and operation of our business may require additional funding for working capital, debt service, the enhancement and upgrade of our network, the build-out of infrastructure to expand our coverage and possible acquisitions of spectrum licenses. In addition, we must use a portion of our cash flows from operations to make payments of principal and interest on our debt, thereby reducing funds that could be available for other purposes, such as working capital, the enhancement and upgrade of our network, the build-out of infrastructure to expand our coverage and possible acquisitions of spectrum licenses. We may be unable to secure such funding when needed in adequate amounts or on acceptable terms, if at all. To execute our business strategy, we may issue additional equity securities in public or private offerings, potentially at a price lower than the market price at the time of such issuance. Alternatively, we may seek additional debt financing, and may be forced to incur significant interest expense. If we cannot secure sufficient funding we may be forced to forego strategic opportunities or delay, scale back or eliminate network deployments, operations, spectrum acquisitions and investments.

Our indebtedness and restrictive debt covenants could limit our financing options and liquidity position, which would limit our ability to grow our business.

In January 2007, we issued 8% senior convertible debentures, due December 31, 2009, in an aggregate principal amount of $3.5 million. The terms of our indebtedness could have negative consequences to the holders of our common stock, such as:


	•	we may be unable to obtain additional financing to fund working capital, operating losses, capital expenditures or acquisitions on terms acceptable or at all;


	•	we may be unable to refinance our indebtedness on terms acceptable to us, or at all; and


	•	we may be more vulnerable to economic downturns and limit our ability to withstand competitive pressures.

Table of Contents

Additionally, covenants in the securities purchase agreement governing our debentures impose operating and financial restrictions on us. These restrictions prohibit or limit our ability, and the ability of our subsidiaries, to, among other things:


	•	pay cash dividends to our stockholders;


	•	incur additional indebtedness;


	•	permit liens on or conduct sales of any assets pledged as collateral; and


	•	engage in transactions with affiliates.

These restrictions may limit our ability to obtain additional financing, withstand downturns in our business and take advantage of business opportunities. Moreover, we may seek additional debt financing on terms that include more restrictive covenants, may require repayment on an accelerated schedule or may impose other obligations that limit our ability to grow our business, acquire needed assets, or take other actions we might otherwise consider appropriate or desirable.

Some of our competitors are better established and have resources significantly greater than we have, which may make it difficult to attract and retain subscribers.

The market for broadband and related services is highly competitive, and we compete with several other companies within each of our markets. Many of our competitors are well established with larger and better developed networks and support systems, longer-standing relationships with customers and suppliers, greater name recognition and greater financial, technical and marketing resources than we have. Our competitors may subsidize competing services with revenue from other sources and, thus, may offer their products and services at prices lower than ours. Our competitors may also reduce the prices of their services significantly or may offer broadband connectivity packaged with other products or services. We may not be able to reduce our prices or otherwise combine our services with other products or services, which may make it more difficult to attract and retain subscribers.

Many of our competitors are better established or have greater financial resources than we have. Our competitors include:


	•	cable operators offering high-speed Internet connectivity services and voice communications;


	•	incumbent and competitive local exchange carriers providing digital subscriber line, or DSL, services over existing wide, metropolitan, and local area networks;


	•	third generation, or 3G, cellular, personal communications service, or PCS, and other wireless providers offering wireless broadband services and capabilities, including developments in existing cellular and PCS technology that may increase network speeds or have other advantages over our services;


	•	Internet service providers offering dial-up Internet connectivity;


	•	municipalities and other entities operating free or subsidized networks;


	•	providers of VoIP telephone services;


	•	wireless Internet service providers using licensed or unlicensed spectrum;


	•	satellite and fixed wireless service providers offering or developing broadband Internet connectivity and VoIP telephony;


	•	electric utilities and other providers offering or planning to offer broadband Internet connectivity over power lines; and


	•	resellers providing wireless Internet service by ‘‘piggy-backing’’ on DSL or networks operated by others.

We expect other existing and prospective competitors to adopt technologies or business plans similar to ours, or seek other means to develop services competitive with ours, particularly if our services prove to be attractive in our target markets. This competition may make it difficult to attract and retain subscribers.

Table of Contents

We may experience difficulties in constructing, upgrading and maintaining our network, which could adversely affect customer satisfaction, increase subscriber turnover and reduce our revenues.

Our success depends on developing and providing products and services that give subscribers high quality Internet connectivity. If the number of subscribers using our network and the complexity of our products and services increase, we will require more infrastructure and network resources to maintain the quality of our services. Consequently, we may be required to make substantial investments to construct and improve our facilities and equipment and to upgrade our technology and network infrastructure. If we do not implement these developments successfully, or if we experience inefficiencies, operational failures, or unforeseen costs during implementation, the quality of our products and services could decline.

We may experience quality deficiencies, cost overruns and delays in implementing our network improvements and expansion, in maintenance and upgrade projects, including the portions of those projects not within our control or the control of our contractors. Our network requires the receipt of permits and approvals from numerous governmental bodies, including municipalities and zoning boards. Such bodies often limit the expansion of transmission towers and other construction necessary for our business. Failure to receive approvals in a timely fashion can delay system rollouts and raise the cost of completing projects. In addition, we typically are required to obtain rights from land, building and tower owners to install our antennae and other equipment to provide service to our subscribers. We may not be able to obtain, on terms acceptable to us, or at all, the rights necessary to construct our network and expand our services.

We also face challenges in managing and operating our network. These challenges include operating, maintaining and upgrading network and customer premises equipment to accommodate increased traffic or technological advances, and managing the sales, advertising, customer support, billing and collection functions of our business while providing reliable network service at expected speeds and quality. Our failure in any of these areas could adversely affect customer satisfaction, increase subscriber turnover or churn, increase our costs and decrease our revenues.

If we do not obtain and maintain rights to use licensed spectrum in one or more markets, we may be unable to operate in these markets which could negatively impact our ability to execute our business strategy. To the extent we secure licensed spectrum, we face increased operational costs, greater regulatory scrutiny and being subject to arbitrary government decision making.

Since we provide our services in some markets by using licensed spectrum, we must secure and maintain sufficient rights to use licensed spectrum by obtaining licenses or long-term leases in those markets. Obtaining licensed spectrum can be a long and difficult process that can be costly and require a disproportionate amount of our management resources, and may require us to incur significant indebtedness or secure additional capital. We may not be successful in our efforts to secure financing and may not be deemed a qualified bidder due to our small size or our creditworthiness, or be able to acquire, lease, or maintain the spectrum necessary to execute our strategy.

Licensed spectrum, whether owned or leased, pose additional risks, including:


	•	inability to satisfy build-out or service deployment requirements upon which spectrum licenses or leases are, or may be, conditioned;


	•	increases in spectrum acquisition costs or complexity;


	•	competitive bids, pre-bid qualifications, and post-bid requirements for spectrum acquisitions, in which we may not be successful leading to, among other things, increased competition;


	•	adverse changes to regulations governing spectrum rights;


	•	the risk that spectrum acquired or leased will not be commercially usable or free of damaging interference from licensed or unlicensed operators in our or adjacent bands;


	•	contractual disputes with, or the bankruptcy or other reorganization of, the license holders, which could adversely affect control over the spectrum subject to such licenses;

Table of Contents


	•	failure of the Federal Communications Commission or other regulators to renew spectrum licenses as they expire; and


	•	invalidation of authorization to use all or a significant portion of our spectrum.

In a number of markets we utilize unlicensed spectrum, which is subject to intense competition, low barriers of entry and slowdowns due to multiple simultaneous users.

We presently utilize unlicensed spectrum in connection with our service offerings. Unlicensed or ‘‘free’’ spectrum is available to multiple simultaneous users and may suffer bandwidth limitations, interference, and slowdowns if the number of users exceeds traffic capacity. The availability of unlicensed spectrum is not unlimited and others do not need to obtain permits or licenses to utilize the same unlicensed spectrum that we currently or may in the future utilize, threatening our ability to reliably deliver our services. Moreover, the prevalence of unlicensed spectrum creates low barriers of entry in our business, creating the potential for heightened competition.

Interruption or failure of our information technology and communications systems could impair our ability to provide our services, which could damage our reputation and harm our operating results.

Our services depend on the continuing operation of our information technology and communications systems. We have experienced service interruptions in the past and may experience service interruptions or system failures in the future. Any unscheduled service interruption adversely affects our ability to operate our business and could result in an immediate loss of revenues. If we experience frequent or persistent system or network failures, our reputation could be permanently harmed. We may need to make significant capital expenditures to increase the reliability of our systems, but these capital expenditures may not achieve the results we expect.

Excessive customer churn may adversely affect our financial performance by slowing customer growth, increasing costs and reducing revenue.

The successful implementation of our business plan depends upon controlling customer churn. Customer churn is a measure of customers who stop using our services. Customer churn could increase as a result of:


	•	billing errors and/or general reduction in the quality of our customer service;


	•	interruptions to the delivery of services to customers over our network; and


	•	the availability of competing technology, such as cable modems, DSL, third-generation cellular, satellite, wireless internet service and other emerging technologies, some of which may, from time to time, be less expensive or technologically superior to those offered by us.

An increase in customer churn can lead to slower customer growth, increased costs and a reduction in revenue.

If our strategy is unsuccessful, we will not be profitable and our stockholders could lose their investment.

There is no track record for companies pursuing our strategy. Many fixed wireless companies that have sought to develop markets in which we operate by pursuing alternative business strategies or strategies similar to ours have failed and there is no guarantee that our strategy will be successful or profitable. If our strategy is unsuccessful, we may fail to meet our objectives and not realize the revenues or profits from the business we pursue that may cause the value of our company to decrease, thereby potentially causing our stockholders to lose their investment.

We may not be able to effectively control and manage our growth, which would negatively impact our operations.

If our business and markets continue to grow and develop it will be necessary for us to finance and manage expansion in an orderly fashion. In addition, we may face challenges in managing expanding product and service offerings and in integrating acquired businesses with our own. Such eventualities will increase demands on our existing management, workforce, and facilities. Failure to satisfy increased demands could interrupt or adversely affect our operations and cause backlogs and administrative inefficiencies.

Table of Contents

The success of our business depends on the continuing contributions of our key personnel and our ability to attract, train and retain highly qualified personnel.

We are highly dependent on the continued services of our chairman, Philip Urso, our chief executive officer and president, Jeffrey M. Thompson, and our chief financial officer, George E. Kilguss, III. Loss of the services of any of these individuals could adversely impact our operations. None of these persons is bound by an employment contract and we do not maintain any policies of ‘‘key man’’ insurance on our executives. As a result, we cannot guarantee that any of these persons will stay with us for any definite period.

In addition, to successfully introduce our services in new markets and grow our business in existing markets, we must be able to attract, train, motivate and retain highly skilled and experienced technical employees. Qualified technical employees periodically are in great demand and may be unavailable in the time frame required to satisfy our customers’ requirements. We may not be able to attract and retain sufficient numbers of highly skilled technical employees in the future. The loss of technical personnel or our inability to hire or retain sufficient technical personnel at competitive rates of compensation could impair our ability to successfully grow our business and retain our existing customer base.

Any acquisitions we make could result in integration difficulties that could lead to substantial costs, delays or other operational or financial difficulties.

We may seek to expand by acquiring competing businesses in our current or other geographic markets, including as a means to acquire spectrum. We cannot accurately predict the timing, size and success of our acquisition efforts and the associated capital commitments that might be required. We expect to face competition for acquisition candidates, which may limit the number of acquisition opportunities available to us and may lead to higher acquisition prices. We may not be able to identify, acquire or profitably manage additional businesses or successfully integrate acquired businesses, if any, into our company, without substantial costs, delays or other operational or financial difficulties. In addition, acquisitions involve a number of other risks, including:


	•	failure of the acquired businesses to achieve expected results;


	•	diversion of management’s attention and resources to acquisitions;


	•	failure to retain key customers or personnel of the acquired businesses;


	•	disappointing quality or functionality of acquired equipment and people: and


	•	risks associated with unanticipated events, liabilities or contingencies.

Client dissatisfaction or performance problems at a single acquired business could negatively affect our reputation. The inability to acquire businesses on reasonable terms or successfully integrate and manage acquired companies, or the occurrence of performance problems at acquired companies, could result in dilution, unfavorable accounting treatment or one-time charges and difficulties in successfully managing our business.

Our inability to obtain capital, use internally generated cash or debt, or use shares of our common stock to finance future acquisitions could impair the growth and expansion of our business.

The extent to which we will be able or willing to use shares of our common stock to consummate acquisitions will depend on our market value, which will vary, and liquidity, which is presently limited, and the willingness of potential sellers to accept shares of our common stock as full or partial payment for their business. Using shares of our common stock for this purpose also may result in significant dilution to our then existing stockholders. To the extent that we are unable to use our common stock to make future acquisitions, our ability to grow through acquisitions may be limited by the extent to which we are able to raise capital through debt or additional equity financings. We may not be able to obtain the necessary capital to finance any acquisitions. If we are unable to obtain additional capital on acceptable terms, we may be required to reduce the scope of any expansion or redirect resources committed to internal purposes. Our failure to use shares of our common stock to make future acquisitions may hinder our ability to actively pursue our acquisition program.

Table of Contents

If we are unable to protect our intellectual property, or if we infringe upon others, it could be time consuming and expensive.

Our success and ability to compete are substantially dependent on our proprietary technology and trademarks, which we attempt to protect through a combination of copyrights, trade secret and trademark laws as well as confidentiality procedures and contractual provisions. However, any steps we take to protect our intellectual property may be inadequate, time consuming and expensive, and the steps taken by us may not prevent misappropriation of our technology. In addition, we may infringe upon the intellectual property rights of third parties, including third party rights in patents that have not yet been issued. Any claims regarding the rights of third parties, with or without merit, could be time consuming to defend, result in costly litigation, divert management’s attention and resources, cause service delays or require us to enter into royalty or licensing agreements. Such royalty or licensing agreements, if required, may not be available on terms favorable to us, if at all.

We rely on a limited number of third party suppliers that produce our network equipment and to install and maintain our network sites. If these companies fail to perform or experience delays, shortages, or increased demand for their products or services, we may face shortage of components, increased costs, and may be required to suspend our network deployment and our product and service introduction.

We depend on a limited number of third party suppliers to produce and deliver products required for our networks. We also depend on a limited number of third parties to install and maintain our network facilities. We do not maintain any long term supply contracts with these manufacturers. If a manufacturer or other provider does not satisfy our requirements, or if we lose a manufacturer or any other significant provider, we may have insufficient network equipment for delivery to subscribers and for installation or maintenance of our infrastructure, and we may be forced to suspend the deployment of our wireless broadband network and enrollment of new subscribers, thus impairing future growth.

If our data security measures are breached, subscribers may perceive our network and services as not secure and will go to a competitor.

Network security and the authentication of a subscriber’s credentials are designed to protect unauthorized access to data on our network. Because techniques used to obtain unauthorized access to or to sabotage networks change frequently and may not be recognized until launched against a target, we may be unable to anticipate or implement adequate preventive measures against unauthorized access or sabotage. Consequently, unauthorized parties may overcome our encryption and security systems and obtain access to data on our network, including on a device connected to our network. In addition, because we operate and control our network and our subscribers’ Internet connectivity, unauthorized access or sabotage of our network could result in damage to our network and to the computers or other devices used by our subscribers. An actual or perceived breach of network security, regardless of whether the breach is our fault, could harm public perception of the effectiveness of our security measures, adversely affect our ability to attract and retain subscribers, expose us to significant liability and adversely affect our business prospects.

Risks Relating to Our Industry

The industry in which we operate is continually evolving, which makes it difficult to evaluate our future prospects and increases the risk of an investment in us. Our services may become obsolete, and we may not be able to develop competitive products or services on a timely basis or at all.

The broadband and wireless services industries are characterized by rapid technological change, competitive pricing, frequent new service introductions, and evolving industry standards and regulatory requirements. We believe that our success depends on our ability to anticipate and adapt to these challenges and to offer competitive services on a timely basis. We face a number of difficulties and uncertainties associated with our reliance on technological development, such as:


	•	competition from service providers using more traditional and commercially proven means to deliver similar or alternative services;


	•	competition from new service providers using more efficient, less expensive technologies, including products not yet invented or developed;

Table of Contents


	•	uncertain customer acceptance;


	•	realizing economies of scale;


	•	responding successfully to advances in competing technologies in a timely and cost-effective manner;


	•	migration toward standards-based technology, requiring substantial capital expenditures; and


	•	existing, proposed or undeveloped technologies that may render our wireless broadband services less profitable or obsolete.

As the services offered by us and our competitors develop, businesses and consumers may not accept our services as a commercially viable alternative to other means of delivering wireless broadband services. As a result, our services may become obsolete, and we may not be unable to develop competitive products or services on a timely basis or at all.

We are subject to extensive regulation that could limit or restrict our activities.

Our acquisition, lease, maintenance, and use of spectrum licenses are extensively regulated by federal, state and local governmental entities. A number of other federal, state and local privacy, security, and consumer laws also apply to our business. These regulations and their application are subject to continual change as new legislation, regulations or amendments to existing regulations are adopted from time to time by governmental or regulatory authorities, including as a result of judicial interpretations of such laws and regulations. Current regulations directly affect the breadth of services we are able to offer and may impact the rates, terms and conditions of our services. Regulation of companies that offer competing services, such as cable and DSL providers and telecommunications carriers, also affects our business.

In addition, the Federal Communications Commission or other regulatory authorities may in the future restrict our ability to manage subscribers’ use of our network, thereby limiting our ability to prevent or address subscribers’ excessive bandwidth demands. To maintain the quality of our network and user experience, we may manage the bandwidth used by our subscribers’ applications, in part by restricting the types of applications that may be used over our network. If the Federal Communications Commission or other regulatory authorities were to adopt regulations that constrain our ability to employ bandwidth management practices, excessive use of bandwidth-intensive applications would likely reduce the quality of our services for all subscribers. Such decline in the quality of our services could harm our business.

The breach of a license or applicable law, even if inadvertent, can result in the revocation, suspension, cancellation or reduction in the term of a license or the imposition of fines. In addition, regulatory authorities may grant new licenses to third parties, resulting in greater competition in territories where we already have rights to licensed spectrum. In order to promote competition, licenses may also require that third parties be granted access to our bandwidth, frequency capacity, facilities or services. We may not be able to obtain or retain any required license, and we may not be able to renew a license on favorable terms, or at all.

Wireless broadband services may become subject to greater state or federal regulation in the future. The scope of the regulations that may apply to companies like us and the impact of such regulations on our competitive position are presently unknown and could be detrimental to our business and prospects.

Risks Relating to the Offering

There may be a limited market for our securities and we may fail to qualify for a Nasdaq or other listing, which could make it more difficult for investors to sell their shares.

Although we plan on applying for listing of our common stock on the Nasdaq Stock Market once we meet the qualifications, our initial listing application may not be granted, as we may not meet the required listing criteria. Thereafter, there can be no assurance that trading of our common stock on such market will be sustained or desirable. At the present time, we do not qualify for certain of the

Table of Contents

initial listing requirements of the Nasdaq Stock Market. In the event that our common stock fails to qualify for initial or continued inclusion, our common stock could thereafter only be quoted on the OTC Bulletin Board or in what are commonly referred to as the ‘‘pink sheets.’’ Under such circumstances, you may find it more difficult to dispose of, or to obtain accurate quotations, for our common stock, and our common stock would become substantially less attractive to certain purchasers, such as financial institutions, hedge funds, and large investors.

Our common stock may be deemed a ‘‘penny stock’’, which would make it more difficult for our investors to sell their shares.

Our common stock may be subject to the ‘‘penny stock’’ rules adopted under Section 15(g) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. The penny stock rules apply to non-Nasdaq listed companies whose common stock trades at less than $5.00 per share or that have tangible net worth of less than $5,000,000 ($2,000,000 if the company has been operating for three or more years). These rules require, among other things, that brokers who trade penny stock to persons other than ‘‘established customers’’ complete specified documentation, make suitability inquiries of investors and provide investors with specified information concerning trading in the security, including a risk disclosure document and quote information under some circumstances. Many brokers have decided not to trade penny stocks because of the requirements of the penny stock rules and, as a result, the number of broker-dealers willing to act as market makers in these securities is limited. If we remain subject to the penny stock rules for any significant period, that could have an adverse effect on the market, if any, for our securities. If our securities are subject to the penny stock rules, investors will find it more difficult to dispose of our securities.

Offers or availability for sale of a substantial number of shares of our common stock may cause the price of our common stock to decline.

If our stockholders sell substantial amounts of our common stock in the public market, including shares covered by the registration statement of which this prospectus forms a part, or upon the expiration of any statutory holding period, under Rule 144, or upon expiration of lock-up periods applicable to outstanding shares, or issued upon the exercise of outstanding options or warrants, could create a circumstance commonly referred to as an ‘‘overhang’’ and in anticipation of which the market price of our common stock could fall. The existence of an overhang, whether or not sales have occurred or are occurring, also could make more difficult our ability to raise additional financing through the sale of equity or equity-related securities in the future at a time and price that we deem reasonable or appropriate.

We have not paid dividends in the past and do not expect to pay dividends in the future. Any return on investment may be limited to the value of our common stock.

We have never paid cash dividends on our common stock and do not anticipate doing so in the foreseeable future. The payment of dividends on our common stock will depend on our earnings, financial condition and other business and economic factors as our board of directors may consider relevant. If we do not pay dividends, our common stock may be less valuable because a return on your investment will only occur if our stock price appreciates.

Risks Relating to Our Organization

Our certificate of incorporation allows for our board to create new series of preferred stock without further approval by our stockholders, which could adversely affect the rights of the holders of our common stock.

Our board of directors has the authority to fix and determine the relative rights and preferences of preferred stock. Our board of directors also has the authority to issue preferred stock without further stockholder approval. As a result, our board of directors could authorize the issuance of a series of preferred stock that would grant to holders the preferred right to our assets upon liquidation, the right to receive dividend payments before dividends are distributed to the holders of common stock and the right to the redemption of the shares, together with a premium, prior to the redemption of our common stock. In addition, our board of directors could authorize the issuance of a series of

Table of Contents

preferred stock that has greater voting power than our common stock or that is convertible into our common stock, which could decrease the relative voting power of our common stock or result in dilution to our existing stockholders.

Our officers and directors own a substantial amount of our common stock and, therefore, exercise significant control over our corporate governance and affairs, which may result in their taking actions with which you do not agree.

Our executive officers and directors, and entities affiliated with them, control approximately 39.15% of our outstanding common stock (including exercisable stock options held by them). These shareholders, if they act together, may be able to exercise substantial influence over the outcome of all corporate actions requiring approval of our shareholders, including the election of directors and approval of significant corporate transactions, which may result in corporate action with which you do not agree. This concentration of ownership may also have the effect of delaying or preventing a change in control, which might be in your best interest, and might negatively affect the market price of our common stock.

We are subject to financial reporting and other requirements for which our accounting, internal audit and other management systems and resources may not be adequately prepared.

On January 12, 2007, we became subject to reporting and other obligations under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, including the requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. Section 404 will require us to conduct an annual management assessment of the effectiveness of our internal controls over financial reporting and to obtain a report by our independent auditors addressing these assessments. These reporting and other obligations will place significant demands on our management, administrative, operational, internal audit and accounting resources. We anticipate that we will need to upgrade our systems; implement additional financial and management controls, reporting systems and procedures; implement an internal audit function; and hire additional accounting, internal audit and finance staff. If we are unable to accomplish these objectives in a timely and effective fashion, our ability to comply with our financial reporting requirements and other rules that apply to reporting companies could be impaired. Any failure to maintain effective internal controls could have a negative impact on our ability to manage our business and on our stock price.

Because we became public by means of a reverse merger, we may not be able to attract the attention of major brokerage firms.

There may be risks associated with us becoming public through a ‘‘reverse merger’’. Securities analysts of major brokerage firms may not provide coverage of us since there is no incentive to brokerage firms to recommend the purchase of our common stock. No assurance can be given that brokerage firms will, in the future, want to conduct any secondary offerings on our behalf.

Table of Contents

SPECIAL NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This prospectus contains ‘‘forward-looking statements,’’ which include information relating to future events, future financial performance, strategies, expectations, competitive environment and regulations. Words such as ‘‘may,’’ ‘‘should,’’ ‘‘could,’’ ‘‘would,’’ ‘‘predicts,’’ ‘‘potential,’’ ‘‘continue,’’ ‘‘expects,’’ ‘‘anticipates,’’ ‘‘future,’’ ‘‘intends,’’ ‘‘plans,’’ ‘‘believes,’’ ‘‘estimates,’’ and similar expressions, as well as statements in future tense, identify forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements should not be read as a guarantee of future performance or results and will probably not be accurate indications of when such performance or results will be achieved. Forward-looking statements are based on information we have when those statements are made or our management’s good faith belief as of that time with respect to future events, and are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual performance or results to differ materially from those expressed in or suggested by the forward-looking statements. Important factors that could cause such differences include, but are not limited to:


	•	We are an early stage company with a history of operating losses and we expect to continue to realize significant net losses for the foreseeable future. As of December 31, 2006, our accumulated deficit was approximately $8,213,000.


	•	Our business plan may require us to raise additional financing both in the near term and over the next five years or more and we intend to invest significantly in our business before we expect to generate cash flow from operations adequate to cover our anticipated expenses. If we are unable to obtain additional debt or equity financing, our business, prospects, financial condition and results of operations may be adversely affected.


	•	Many of our competitors are better established and have significantly greater resources, and may subsidize their competitive offerings with other products and services, which may make it difficult for us to attract and retain subscribers.


	•	Interruption or failure of our information technology and communications systems could impair our ability to provide our services, which could damage our reputation and harm our operating results.


	•	Our business is subject to rapid changes in technology and if we fail to respond to technological developments, our business may be adversely affected.


	•	The successful implementation of our business plan depends upon controlling customer churn.


	•	Since January 2007 we have borrowed $3.5 million. Our indebtedness and restrictive debt covenants could limit our financing options and liquidity position and may limit our ability to grow our business.


	•	Management collectively controls a substantial amount of our common stock, and may have, or may develop in the future, interests that may diverge from yours.


	•	Future sales of large blocks of our common stock may adversely impact our stock price.

You should review carefully the section entitled ‘‘Risk Factors’’ beginning on page 3 of this prospectus for a discussion of these and other risks that relate to our business and investing in shares of our common stock.

USE OF PROCEEDS

We will not receive any proceeds from the sale of common stock by the selling stockholders.

A portion of the shares covered by this prospectus are issuable upon exercise of warrants to purchase our common stock. A number of these warrants have a cashless exercise option. If, however, a selling stockholder were to exercise its warrants for cash, the selling stockholder would pay us the exercise price of the warrants.

Table of Contents

MARKET FOR OUR COMMON STOCK AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

Our common stock has been quoted on the OTC Bulletin Board since January 26, 2007 under the symbol TWER.OB. Prior to that date, there was no active market for our common stock. The following table sets forth the high and low bid prices for our common stock for the periods indicated, as reported by the OTC Bulletin Board. The quotations reflect inter-dealer prices, without retail mark-up, mark-down or commission, and may not represent actual transactions.


Fiscal Year 2007	High			Low
First Quarter (through March 16, 2007)		$	11.00		$	0.66

The last reported sales price of our common stock on the OTC Bulletin Board on March 16, 2007, was $6.60 per share. As of March 16, 2007, there were approximately 149 holders of record of our common stock.

DIVIDEND POLICY

In the past, we have not declared or paid cash dividends on our common stock, and we do not intend to pay any cash dividends on our common stock. Rather, we intend to retain future earnings (if any) to fund the operation and expansion of our business and for general corporate purposes. In addition, our $3,500,000 8% Convertible Debentures due December 31, 2009 prohibit us from paying any cash dividends so long as any portion of the debentures remain outstanding.

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OR PLAN OF OPERATION

Recent Events

Prior to January 12, 2007, we were a public shell company without material assets or liabilities. On January 12, 2007, Towerstream I, Inc. completed a reverse merger with us, pursuant to which Towerstream I, Inc. became our wholly-owned subsidiary and we succeeded to the business of Towerstream I, Inc. as our sole line of business and the former security holders of Towerstream I, Inc. became our controlling stockholders. For financial reporting purposes, Towerstream I, Inc. was considered the accounting acquiror in the reverse merger. Accordingly, the historical financial statements presented and the discussion of financial condition and results of operations below are those of Towerstream I, Inc. and do not include our historical financial results. All costs associated with the reverse merger were expensed as incurred.

Overview

We are a leading supplier of fixed, high-speed, wireless broadband services to commercial users, with operations in New York City, Chicago, Los Angeles, Boston, San Francisco, Seattle, Providence and Newport, Rhode Island. Our fixed wireless broadband network delivers high-speed Internet access supporting VoIP, bandwidth on demand, wireless redundancy, VPNs, disaster recovery, bundled data, and video services. Furthermore, we offer customers bandwidth connection speeds ranging from the equivalent of a standard T-1 telephone line and up to 1,000 million bits per second.

Characteristics of our Revenues and Expenses

We offer our services under service agreements having terms of one, two or three years. Pursuant to these agreements, we bill customers on a monthly basis, in advance, for each month of service. To this end, payments received in advance of services performed are recorded as deferred revenues.

Cost of revenues primarily consists of all expenses that are directly attributable to providing our service, and include the costs associated with bandwidth purchases and tower and rooftop rents. Fluctuations in our gross margin may occur due to the addition of network capacity to either existing points of presence or adding additional coverage through the addition of new locations or opening of new markets.

Table of Contents

Sales and marketing expenses primarily consist of the salaries, benefits, travel and other costs of our sales and marketing teams, as well as marketing initiatives and business development expenses. General and administrative expenses primarily consist of the costs attributable to the support of our operations, such as costs related to information systems, salaries, expenses and office space costs for executive management, inside sales, technical support, financial accounting, purchasing, administrative and human resources personnel, insurance, recruiting fees, legal, accounting and other professional services.

Year Ended December 31, 2006 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2005

Revenues. During the year ended December 31, 2006, we had revenues of $6,296,218, as compared to revenues of $5,397,510 during the year ended December 31, 2005, representing an increase of approximately 16.6%. This increase was primarily attributable to the growth of our network subscriber base.

Operating Loss. Operating expenses, which consist of cost of revenues, depreciation, customer support services, selling, general and administrative costs, totaled $6,986,722 for the year ended December 31, 2006, as compared to $6,127,770 for the year ended December 31, 2005, representing an increase of approximately 14.0%, the components of which are discussed in further detail below. In contrast, our operating loss for the year ended December 31, 2006 was $690,504, as compared to a loss of $730,260 for the year ended December 31, 2005, representing a decrease of approximately 5.4%. Our operating loss decreased as a result of our revenue growth and the absorption of certain current fixed costs and network capacity.

Cost of Revenues. Cost of revenues, which consists of tower rental charges, bandwidth purchases, and related engineering costs and overhead, exclusive of depreciation, totaled $1,636,820 for the year ended December 31, 2006, as compared to $1,509,505 for the year ended December 31, 2005, resulting in gross margins, before depreciation, of 74.0% and 72.0%, respectively. This increased margin is the result of a growing subscriber base and our ability to utilize existing fixed cost capacity to service our new subscribers.

Selling, General, and Administrative Expenses. Selling, general, and administrative expenses, which consist of commissions, salaries, advertising, and overhead expenses, totaled $3,636,376 for the year ended December 31, 2006, as compared to $3,265,352 for the year ended December 31, 2005, representing an increase of approximately 11.4%. This increase was primarily attributable to our recognition of $100,625 of stock based compensation and approximately $400,000 of legal and accounting costs associated with our reverse merger during the year ended December 31, 2006.

Customer Support Services. Customer support services totaled $507,276 for the year ended December 31, 2006, as compared to $419,356 for the year ended December 31, 2005, representing an increase of approximately 21%. This increase resulted from our hiring additional personnel and acquiring new systems to respond to our customer growth and the continues greater demand for our services.

Depreciation Expense. Depreciation expense totaled $1,206,250 for the year ended December 31, 2006, as compared to $933,557 for the year ended December 31, 2005, representing an increase of 29.2%. This increase was the result of increased purchases of capital equipment to support our increased customer growth of 16.6% in 2006 versus 2005.

Net Loss. We had a net loss of $811,531 for the year ended December 31, 2006, as compared to a net loss of $947,205 for the year ended December 31, 2005, representing a decrease of approximately 14.3%. This decrease in net loss was primarily attributable to our increased sales. We believe that net losses will continue as we make required additions to our sales, engineering and administrative personnel and our network in order to fuel expected revenue and subscriber growth.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

As of December 31, 2006 and December 31, 2005, we had cash and cash equivalents of $160,363 and $203,050, respectively. We have historically met our liquidity requirements from a variety of

Table of Contents

sources, including internally generated cash, short-term borrowings from both related parties and financial institutions and the sale of equity securities.

Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities. Net cash provided by operating activities totaled $967,730 for the year ended December 31, 2006, as compared to $479,285 for the year ended December 31, 2005, representing an increase of approximately 101.9%. This increase was primarily due to improved operating results derived from increased revenues generated in 2006 from our higher subscriber growth.

Net Cash Used in Investing Activities. Net cash used in investing activities was $1,168,109 for the year ended December 31, 2006, as compared to $1,378,027 for the year ended December 31, 2005, representing a decrease of approximately 15.2%. This decrease was due to our taking advantage of capital expended on our network’s capacity and coverage areas in previous years. As a result, we spent $243,000 less capital on our network during the year ended December 31, 2006 than in the year ended December 31, 2005, but expended $50,000 more on the acquisition of a Federal Communications Commission license in 2006 than in 2005.

Net Cash Provided By Financing Activities. Net cash provided by financing activities was $157,692 for the year ended December 31, 2006, as compared to $1,101,792 for the year ended December 31, 2005, representing a decrease of approximately 85.7%. As a result of our improved operating results, we required less funding from outside sources to meet our working capital needs. A significant potion of the $1.1 million of cash provided in fiscal 2005 was attributable to the sale of common stock of $925,000.

Working Capital. As of December 31, 2005, we had negative working capital of $2,323,230 due primarily to the short term nature of our debt. Approximately $1.7 million of our debt obligation was either on a demand basis or had maturities of less than one year. As of December 31, 2006, we had a negative working capital position of $3,323,752. As in previous periods, this negative position was primarily the result of approximately $2.2 million of our debt obligations that were either on a demand basis or had maturities of less than one year. Nevertheless, we believe that our current operating activities, together with the money raised from our private placements in January 2007, will enable us to meet our anticipated cash requirements for fiscal 2007.

As of December 31, 2006 and 2005, we had cash and cash equivalents of $160,363 and $203,050, respectively. We have historically met our liquidity requirements from a variety of sources, including internally generated cash and short-term borrowings from both related parties and financial institutions.

Loans From Related Parties

As of December 31, 2006, we owed a total of approximately $1.9 million to five of our stockholders for past borrowings and services. These loans were short term in nature and had varying interest rates, repayment terms, and conversion features.

During January 2007, our related party lenders sold approximately $1.7 million of debt to unrelated third-parties. The transferred notes, which totaled $1,691,636, accrued interest at 10% per annum, and following our reverse merger on January 12, 2007, were automatically converted into shares of common stock at a conversion price of $1.50 per share.

One note held by a related party in the amount of $250,000, which was not transferred, bore interest at 10% per annum and, following the reverse-merger, converted into common stock at a conversion price of $1.43 per share.

Private Placement

In connection with the reverse merger in January 2007, we completed a private placement, pursuant to which we issued 5,110,056 shares of common stock and five-year warrants to purchase 2,555,028 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $4.50 per share for aggregate gross proceeds of $11,497,625. In connection with this private placement, we incurred placement agent fees of

Table of Contents

approximately $446,400, and issued the placement agents five-year warrants to purchase an aggregate of 140,917 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $4.50 per share. In addition, we incurred other professional fees and expenses totaling approximately $522,300 in connection with the reverse merger and private placement.

Senior Debenture

In conjunction with our reverse merger in January 2007, we also sold $3,500,000 of senior convertible debentures. These debentures require quarterly interest-only payments of 8% per annum and mature on December 31, 2009. The debentures are convertible into shares of common stock at a conversion price of $2.75 per share, subject to certain limitations. In addition, holders of the debentures received five-year warrants to purchase an aggregate of 636,364 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $4.00 per share and five-years warrants to purchase an aggregate of 636,364 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $6.00 per share.

In connection with the issuance of the debentures, we incurred placement agent fees totaling approximately $140,000, and issued to such placement agent a five-year warrant to purchase 63,634 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $4.50 per share. This warrant had an estimated fair value of $34,750.

The above financing activities raised net proceeds of $14,411,237, which will be used to significantly expand our sales and marketing efforts, as well as our expansion into new markets.

Critical Accounting Policies

Our financial statements are prepared in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America, which require us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of our financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. Critical accounting policies are those that require the application of management’s most difficult, subjective, or complex judgments, often because of the need to make estimates about the effect of matters that are inherently uncertain and that may change in subsequent periods. In preparing the financial statements, we utilized available information, including our past history, industry standards and the current economic environment, among other factors, in forming our estimates and judgments, giving due consideration to materiality. Actual results may differ from these estimates. In addition, other companies may utilize different estimates, which may impact the comparability of our results of operations to those of companies in similar businesses. We believe that of our significant accounting policies, the following may involve a higher degree of judgment and estimation.

Property and Equipment. Property and equipment are stated at cost. The costs associated with the construction of our network and subscriber installations are capitalized. Costs include equipment, installation costs and materials. Depreciation is computed by the straight-line method over the following estimated useful lives::


			Years
Furniture, fixtures and equipment			5-7
Computer equipment			5
Systems software			3
Network and base station equipment			5-7
Customer premise equipment			5-7

Use of Estimates. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Long-Lived Assets. Long-lived assets consist primarily of property and equipment. Long-lived assets are reviewed annually for impairment or whenever events or circumstances indicate their

Table of Contents

carrying value may not be recoverable. When such events or circumstances arise, an estimate of the future undiscounted cash flows produced by the asset, or the appropriate grouping of assets, is compared to the asset’s carrying value to determine if impairment exists pursuant to the requirements of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards, or SFAS, No. 144, ‘‘Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets.’’ If the asset is determined to be impaired, the impairment loss is measured based on the excess of its carrying value over its fair value. Assets to be disposed of are reported at the lower of their carrying value or net realizable value.

Revenue Recognition. Revenues are recognized at the time access to our services is made available to customers. Contractual arrangements range from one to three years. Deferred revenues are recognized as a liability when billings are received in advance of the date when revenues are earned. Our revenue arrangements with multiple deliverables under Emerging Issues Task Force, EITF, 00-21 are deemed to be immaterial.

Stock-Based Compensation. Effective January 1, 2006, we adopted SFAS No. 123 (revised 2004), ‘‘Share-Based Payment,’’ (SFAS 123R), which is a revision of SFAS No. 123, ‘‘Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation.’’ SFAS No. 123R supersedes Accounting Principles Board, or APB, Opinion No. 25, ‘‘Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees’’, and amends SFAS No. 95, ‘‘Statement of Cash Flows.’’ SFAS No. 123R requires all share-based payments to employees, including grants of employee stock options, to be recognized in the financial statements based upon their fair values. As a result, the intrinsic value method of accounting for stock options with pro forma footnote disclosure, as allowed for under SFAS No. 123, is no longer permitted. We adopted SFAS No. 123R using the modified prospective method, which requires us to record compensation expense for all awards granted after the date of adoption, and for the unvested portion of previously granted awards that remain outstanding at the date of adoption. Accordingly, prior period amounts have not been restated to reflect the adoption of SFAS No. 123R. After assessing alternative valuation models and amortization assumptions, we chose to continue using the Black-Scholes valuation model and recognition of compensation expense over the requisite service period of the grant.

Convertible Notes Payable. We account for conversion options embedded in convertible notes in accordance with SFAS No. 133, ‘‘Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities,’’ and EITF 00-19, ‘‘Accounting for Derivative Financial Instruments Indexed to, and Potentially Settled in, a Company’s Own Stock.’’ SFAS 133 generally requires companies to bifurcate conversion options embedded in convertible notes and preferred shares from their host instruments and to account for them as free standing derivative financial instruments in accordance with EITF 00-19. SFAS 133 provides for an exception to this rule when convertible notes are deemed to be conventional, as that term is described in the implementation guidance provided in paragraph 61(k) of Appendix A to SFAS 133 and further clarified in EITF 05-2 ‘‘The Meaning of Conventional Convertible Debt Instrument’’ in Issue No. 00-19. SFAS 133 provides for an additional exception to this rule when the economic characteristics and risks of the embedded derivative instrument are clearly and closely related to the economic characteristics and risks of the host instrument. We account for convertible notes (deemed conventional) and non-conventional convertible debt instruments classified as equity under EITF 00-19 ‘‘Accounting for Derivative Financial Investments indexed to, and potentially settled in, a Company’s own stock’’ and in accordance with the provisions of EITF 98-5, ‘‘Accounting for Convertible Securities with Beneficial Conversion Features,’’ and EITF 00-27 ‘‘Application of EITF 98-5 to Certain Convertible Instruments.’’ Accordingly, we record, as a discount to convertible notes, the intrinsic value of such conversion options based upon the differences between the fair value of the underlying common stock at the commitment date of the note transaction and the effective conversion price embedded in the note. Debt discounts under these arrangements are amortized over the term of the related debt to their earliest date of redemption.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

On February 15, 2007, FASB issued SFAS No. 159, entitled ‘‘The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities.’’ The guidance in SFAS No. 159 ‘‘allows’’ reporting entities to ‘‘choose’’ to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value. The objective underlying the development of this literature is to improve financial reporting by providing reporting

Table of Contents

entities with the opportunity to reduce volatility in reported earnings that results from measuring related assets and liabilities differently without having to apply complex hedge accounting provisions, using the guidance in SFAS No. 133, as amended, entitled ‘‘Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities’’. The provisions of SFAS No. 159 are applicable to all reporting entities and is effective as of the beginning of the first fiscal year that begins subsequent to November 15, 2007. We do not believe this new accounting standard will have a material impact on our financial condition or results of operations.

In December 2006, FASB issued FASB Staff Position EITF 00-19-2 ‘‘Accounting for Registration Payment Arrangements,’’ which specifies that the contingent obligation to make future payments or otherwise transfer consideration under a registration payment arrangement should be separately recognized and measured in accordance with SFAS No. 5, ‘‘Accounting for Contingencies.’’ Adoption of EITF 00-19-02 is required for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006. We are currently evaluating the expected effect of EITF 00-19-02 on our consolidated financial statements and are currently not yet in a position to determine such effects.

In September 2006, FASB issued SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements. This statement provides a single definition of fair value, a framework for measuring fair value, and expanded disclosures concerning fair value. Previously, different definitions of fair value were contained in various accounting pronouncements creating inconsistencies in measurement and disclosures. SFAS No. 157 applies under those previously issued pronouncements that prescribe fair value as the relevant measure of value, except SFAS No. 123R and related interpretations and pronouncements that require or permit measurement similar to fair value but are not intended to measure fair value. This pronouncement is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. We are evaluating the impact of this new standard, but currently believe that the adoption of this new accounting standard will not have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.

In September 2006, the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Office of the Chief Accountant and Divisions of Corporation Finance and Investment Management released Staff Accounting Bulletin, or SAB, No. 108, Considering the Effects of Prior Year Misstatements when Quantifying Misstatements in Current Year Financial Statements, which provides interpretive guidance on how the effects of the carryover or reversal of prior year misstatements should be considered in quantifying a current year misstatement. The Securities and Exchange Commission’s staff believes that registrants should quantify errors using both a balance sheet and an income statement approach and evaluate whether either approach results in quantifying a misstatement that, when all relevant quantitative and qualitative factors are considered, is material. This pronouncement is effective for fiscal years ending after November 15, 2006. We adopted SAB No. 108 and found there to be no material impact on our financial position or results of operations.

In July 2006, FASB issued Interpretation No. 48, ‘‘Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes — an Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109.’’ This interpretation establishes for all entities a minimum threshold for financial statement recognition of the benefit of tax positions, and requires certain expanded disclosures. This interpretation is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 31, 2006, and is to be applied to all open tax years as of the date of effectiveness. We are in the process of evaluating the impact of the application of this interpretation to our consolidated financial statements.

In February 2006, FASB issued SFAS No. 155, ‘‘Accounting for Certain Hybrid Financial Instruments’’, an amendment of FASB Statements No. 133 and 140.’’ SFAS 155 clarifies certain issues relating to embedded derivatives and beneficial interests in securitized financial assets. The provisions of SFAS 155 are effective for all financial instruments acquired or issued after fiscal years beginning after September 15, 2006. We do not expect this pronouncement to have a material impact on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

In September 2005, FASB ratified the following consensus reached in EITF 05-8: The issuance of convertible debt with a beneficial conversion feature results in a basis difference in applying SFAS No. 109. Recognition of such a feature effectively creates a debt instrument and a separate equity instrument for book purposes, whereas the convertible debt is treated entirely as a debt instrument for

Table of Contents

income tax purposes. The resulting basis difference should be deemed a temporary difference because it will result in a taxable amount when the recorded amount of the liability is recovered or settled. Recognition of deferred taxes for the temporary difference should be reported as an adjustment to additional paid-in capital. This consensus is effective in the first interim or annual reporting period commencing after December 15, 2005, with early application permitted. The effect of applying the consensus should be accounted for retroactively to all debt instruments containing a beneficial conversion feature that is subject to EITF 00-27, and thus is applicable to debt instruments converted or extinguished in prior periods but which are still presented in the financial statements. The adoption of this pronouncement did not have a material impact on our financial statements.

In June 2005, the EITF reached consensus on EITF 05-6. EITF 05-6 provides guidance on determining the amortization period for leasehold improvements acquired in a business combination or acquired subsequent to lease inception. The guidance in EITF 05-6 will be applied prospectively and is effective for periods beginning after June 29, 2005. The adoption of EITF 05-6 did not have a material impact on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

In June 2005, FASB ratified EITF 05-2, ‘‘The Meaning of Conventional Convertible Debt Instrument’’ in EITF No. 00-19, ‘‘Accounting for Derivative Financial Instruments Indexed to, and Potentially Settled in, a Company’s Own Stock,’’ which addresses when a convertible debt instrument should be considered ‘‘conventional’’ for the purpose of applying the guidance in EITF 00-19. EITF 05-2 also retained the exemption under EITF 00-19 for conventional convertible debt instruments and indicated that convertible preferred stock having a mandatory redemption date may qualify for the exemption provided under EITF 00-19 for conventional convertible debt if the instrument’s economic characteristics are more similar to debt than equity. EITF 05-2 is effective for new instruments entered into and instruments modified in periods beginning after June 29, 2005. The adoption of this pronouncement did not have a material impact on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

In May 2005, FASB issued SFAS No. 154, ‘‘Accounting Changes and Error Correction.’’ SFAS N. 154 replaces APB Opinion No. 20, Accounting Changes, and FASB Statement No. 3, Reporting Accounting Changes in Interim Financial Statements, and changes the requirements for the accounting for and reporting of a change in accounting principle. SFAS No. 154 applies to all voluntary changes in accounting principle. It also applies to changes required by an accounting pronouncement in the unusual instance that the pronouncement does not include specific transition provisions. When a pronouncement includes specific transition provisions, those provisions should be followed. This statement is effective for accounting changes and corrections of errors made in the fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2005. The adoption of this pronouncement did not have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.

Table of Contents

BUSINESS

Overview

We provide fixed wireless broadband services to commercial users based on a traditional monthly subscription model. Specifically, through transmissions over both regulated and unregulated radio spectrum, we offer customers a number of subscription based broadband wireless solutions, including high-speed Internet, Voice over Internet Protocol, or VoIP, bandwidth on demand, wireless redundancy, virtual private networks, or VPNs, disaster recovery, bundled data, and video services. In particular, we currently provide the equivalent of 2,200 T-1 telephone line connections to approximately 700 buildings utilizing fixed wireless technology in New York City, Boston, Chicago, Los Angeles, San Francisco, Seattle, Providence and Newport, Rhode Island.

We tailor our offerings to satisfy customer needs based principally upon size. For small businesses, we offer wireless connections packages ranging from 1,500,000 bits per second, the speed of a traditional T-1 telephone line, to 5,000,000 bits per second. For medium sized businesses, we offer wireless connection packages ranging from 10,000,000 bits per second to 20,000,000 bits per second. Finally, for large business, we offer wireless connection packages ranging from 100,000,000 bits per second to 1,000,000,000 bits per second. As companies grow, they can increase their bandwidth at any time in 1,000,000 bits per second increments, usually without additional installation or equipment charges. Furthermore, regardless of business size and connection package, we guarantee uptime, latency and throughput.

Our Networks

We have constructed proprietary networks in each of the markets we serve by installing antennae on rooftops to send and receive wireless signals. After a local network has been established, we can get customers ‘‘online’’ within 2 to 7 days. Moreover, customers can access our services in our coverage area, up to 10 miles away.

Market Coverage

We intend to grow our business by deploying our service more broadly and rapidly increasing our subscriber base. We intend to deploy our wireless broadband network broadly both in terms of geography and categories of subscribers. We intend to increase the number of markets we serve, taking advantage of our staged roll-out model to deploy our services throughout major United States markets. We also plan to serve a range of commercial subscribers, from small businesses to large enterprises.

We determine which markets to enter by assessing a number of criteria in four broad categories. First, we evaluate our ability to deploy our service in a given market, taking into consideration our spectrum position, the availability of towers and zoning constraints. Second, we assess the market by evaluating the number of competitors, existing price points, demographic characteristics and distribution channels. Third, we evaluate the economic potential of the market, focusing on our forecasts of revenue growth opportunities and capital requirements. Finally, we look at market clustering opportunities and other cost efficiencies that might be realized. Based on this approach, as of December 31, 2006, we offered wireless broadband connectivity in seven markets representing approximately 42% of small and medium business (5 to 249 employees) in the top 20 metropolitan statistical areas.

Sales and Marketing

We have hired salespeople to sell our services directly to subscribers. As of December 31, 2006, we employed approximately 18 salespeople. We generally compensate these employees on a salary plus commission basis.

Our indirect sales channels include a variety of authorized representatives, such as integrators, resellers, and online operators. Authorized representatives assist in developing awareness of and demand for our service by promoting our services and brand as part of their own advertising and direct marketing campaigns.

Table of Contents

As our markets mature, we expect our use of available marketing channels will shift toward our lower-cost channels. Over time, we expect our direct sales force will become increasingly focused on new market development.

Industry

We believe the U.S. broadband market offers significant long-term growth potential. According to IDC, a provider of market intelligence to the information, technology, communications and consumer technology markets, in 2005, an estimated 38.1 million households, or 33% of all U.S. households, subscribed to a broadband service. However, an estimated 36.5 million households, or 32% of all U.S. households, accessed the Internet via a dial-up or other narrowband connection, while an estimated 40.7 million households, or 35% of all U.S. households, had no Internet connectivity at all. Of the 38.1 million households with broadband connectivity in 2005, approximately 55% used a cable modem, 42% used DSL and 3% used other services such as wireless broadband or fiber networks.

According to IDC, the U.S. broadband market is expected to grow at an 18.4% compound annual growth rate between 2006 and 2009. Broadband penetration is expected to exceed 52% of U.S. households by 2009 as dial-up subscribers migrate to broadband connectivity and people with no Internet access become broadband subscribers. The worldwide broadband market is expected to experience similar growth trends, with IDC forecasting a 17% compound annual growth rate from 126.7 million households with broadband Internet connectivity at the end of 2004 to 273.4 million by the end of 2009.

As wireless broadband becomes widely available, we believe demand for a broad range of mobile applications will dramatically increase, including demand for email, web browsing, VoIP telephony, streaming audio and video, video conferencing, gaming, e-commerce, music and video downloading and file transfers. For instance, in its VoIP Forecast Model dated August 2005, Jupiter Research estimates that, in 2005, approximately 3 million U.S. households used a VoIP-based broadband telephony service, while 110.5 million used a traditional switched access telephony service, according to the Federal Communications Commission Statistics of Communications Common Carriers Report. The U.S. VoIP-based broadband telephony market is expected to grow to 16.0 million households by 2009, according to Jupiter Research estimates, representing a 52% compound annual growth rate. The worldwide VoIP telephony market is expected to experience a similar growth trend, with iSuppli Corporation forecasting in its fourth quarter 2005 Broadband and Digital Home Topical Report growth in VoIP subscribers from 14.9 million subscribers in 2005 to 148.8 million subscribers in 2009, a 78% compound annual growth rate.

Competition

The market for broadband services is highly competitive, and includes companies that offer a variety of services using a number of distinctly different technological platforms, such as cable networks, DSL, third-generation cellular, satellite, wireless Internet service and other emerging technologies. We compete with these companies on the basis of the portability, ease of use, speed and price of our respective services. Principal competitors include:

Incumbent Local Exchange Carriers and Common Local Exchange Carriers

We face competition from traditional wireline operators in terms of price, performance, discounted rates for bundles of services, breadth of service, reliability, network security, and ease of access and use. In particular, we face competition from traditional wireline companies like Verizon Communications Inc., Qwest Corporation and AT&T Inc., all of which are so called incumbent local exchange carriers,’’ and Covad Communications Group, Inc., Speakeasy, Inc., XO Communications, LLC, MegaPath Networks Inc., and Choice One Communications Inc., all of which are so called common local exchange carriers.

Cable Modem and DSL Services

We compete with companies that provide Internet connectivity through cable modems or DSL. Principal competitors include cable companies, such as Comcast Corporation, and incumbent

Table of Contents

telephone companies, such as AT&T Inc. or Verizon Communications Inc. Both the cable and telephone companies deploy their services over wired networks initially designed for voice and one-way data transmission that have subsequently been upgraded to provide for additional services.

Cellular and PCS Services

Cellular and personal communications service, or PCS, carriers are seeking to expand their capacity to provide data and voice services that are superior to ours. These providers have substantially broader geographic coverage than we have and, for the foreseeable future, than we expect to have. If one or more of these providers can deploy technologies that compete effectively with our services, the mobility and coverage offered by these carriers will provide even greater competition than we currently face. Moreover, more advanced cellular and PCS technologies, such as third generation mobile technologies currently offer broadband service with packet data transfer speeds of up to 2,000,000 bits per second for fixed applications, and slower speeds for mobile applications. We believe mobile operators, including Cingular Wireless LLC, Sprint Nextel Corporation, T-Mobile USA, Inc, Verizon Communications Inc. and others, will roll out third generation cellular services across most major U.S. markets by the end of 2007. We also expect that third generation technology will be improved to increase connectivity speeds to make it more suitable for a range of advanced applications.

Wireless Broadband Service Providers

We also face competition from other wireless broadband service providers that use licensed and unlicensed spectrum. In addition to these commercial operators, many local governments, universities and other governmental or quasi-governmental entities are providing or subsidizing ‘‘WiFi’’ networks over unlicensed spectrum, in some cases at no cost to the user.

Satellite

Satellite providers like WildBlue Communications, Inc. and Hughes Network Systems, LLC offer broadband data services that address a niche market, mainly less densely populated areas that are unserved or underserved by competing service providers. Although satellite offers service to a large geographic area, latency caused by the time it takes for the signal to travel to and from the satellite may challenge the ability to provide some services, such as VoIP, and reduces the size of the addressable market.

Other

We believe other emerging technologies may also seek to enter the broadband services market. For example, we are aware that several power generation and distribution companies intend to provide broadband Internet services over existing power lines.

Competitive Strengths

Even though we face substantial existing and prospective competition, we believe that we have a number of competitive advantages that will allow up to both retain existing customers and attract new ones over time.

Reliability

As compared to cellular, cable and DSL networks that generally rely on infrastructure originally designed for non-broadband purposes, our network was designed specifically to support wireless broadband services. We also connect the customer to our Wireless Ring in the Sky, which has no single point of failure. This ring is fed by multiple lead Internet providers located at opposite ends of our service cities and connected to our national ring which is fed by multiple leading carriers. We believe that we are the only wireless broadband provider that offers True Separate Egress for true redundancy. With DSL and cable offerings, all wires are rendered dead by one backhoe swipe or switch failure. Our Wireless Ring in the Sky is backhoe-proof and weather-proof. As a result of these factors, our network has historically experienced reliability rates of approximately 99%.

Table of Contents

Value

We own our entire network, which enables us to price our services lower than most of our competitors. Specifically, we are able to offer competitive prices, as we do not pass along a local loop charge to our customers, because we do not have to buy one from the telephone company.

Efficient Economic Model

Our economic model is characterized by low fixed capital and operating expenditures relative to other wireless and wireline broadband service providers. We own our entire network, dispensing with the costs involved in using lines owned by telephone or cable companies. Our system is expandable and covers an area up to several miles away from each tower, which will enable us to realize incremental savings in our build-out costs as our subscriber base grows.

World-Class Management Team

Our executive management has over 60 years of combined experience in the communications industry with companies such as Bell Atlantic Corp., The New England Telephone and Telegraph Company and Stratos Global Corporation.

Regulatory Matters

Wireless broadband services are subject to regulation by the Federal Communications Commission. At the federal level, the Federal Communications Commission has jurisdiction over wireless transmissions over the electromagnetic spectrum and all interstate telecommunications services. State regulatory commissions have jurisdiction over intrastate communications. Municipalities may regulate limited aspects of our business by, for example, imposing zoning requirements and requiring installation permits.

Telecommunications Regulation

The Federal Communications Commission has classified Internet access services generally as interstate ‘‘information services’’ rather than as ‘‘telecommunications services’’ regulated under Title II of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended. Accordingly, most regulations that apply to telephone companies and other common carriers do not apply to our wireless broadband Internet access service. For example, we are not currently required to contribute a percentage of gross revenues from our Internet access services to universal service funds used to support local telephone service and advanced telecommunications services for schools, libraries and rural health care facilities.

Internet access providers also are not required to file tariffs with the Federal Communications Commission, setting forth the rates, terms, and conditions of their service offerings. The Federal Communications Commission, however, is currently considering whether to impose various consumer protection obligations, similar to Title II obligations, on wireless broadband Internet access providers. These requirements may include obligations related to truth-in-billing, slamming, discontinuing service, customer proprietary network information and federal universal service funds mechanisms. Internet access providers are currently subject to generally applicable state consumer protection laws enforced by state Attorneys General and general Federal Trade Commission consumer protection rules.

The Federal Communications Commission has not yet classified interconnected VoIP services as information services or telecommunications services under the Communications Act of 1934, as amended. In November 2004, the Federal Communications Commission determined that, regardless of their regulatory classification, certain interconnected VoIP services qualify as interstate services with respect to economic regulation. The Federal Communications Commission preempted state regulations that address such issues as entry certification, tariffing, and enhanced 911 requirements.

The Federal Communications Commission is conducting a comprehensive proceeding to address all types of Internet protocol-enabled services, including interconnected VoIP service, and to consider what regulations, if any, should be applied to such services, as use of broadband services becomes more widespread. In June 2005, the Federal Communications Commission adopted the first set of

Table of Contents

regulations in this comprehensive Internet protocol-enabled proceeding, imposing enhanced 911-related requirements on interconnected VoIP service providers as a condition of offering such service to consumers. The Federal Communications Commission defined ‘‘interconnected VoIP service’’ as voice service that: (i) enables real-time, two-way voice communications; (ii) requires a broadband connection from the user’s location; (iii) requires Internet protocol-compatible customer premises equipment; and (iv) permits users generally to receive calls that originate on and terminate to the public switched telephone network. Effective November 28, 2005, all interconnected VoIP providers are required to transmit, via the wireline, all 911 calls, as well as a call-back number and the caller’s registered location for each call, to the appropriate public safety answering point that is capable of receiving and processing that information. In addition, all interconnected VoIP providers must have a process to obtain a subscriber’s registered location prior to activating service, and must allow their subscribers to update their registered location immediately if the subscriber moves the service to a different location. Interconnected VoIP providers are also required to prominently and in plain English advise subscribers of the manner in which dialing 911 using VoIP service is different from dialing 911 service using traditional telephone service, and to provide warning labels with VoIP equipment.

On August 5, 2005, the Federal Communications Commission adopted an Order finding that both facilities-based broadband Internet access providers and interconnected VoIP providers are subject to the Communications Assistance for Law Enforcement Act, or CALEA, which requires service providers covered by that statute to build certain law enforcement surveillance assistance capabilities into their communications networks. The Federal Communications Commission required facilities-based broadband Internet access providers and interconnected VoIP providers to comply with CALEA requirements by May 14, 2007.

On May 3, 2006, the Federal Communications Commission adopted an additional Order addressing CALEA compliance obligations of these providers. In that order, the Federal Communications Commission: (i) affirmed the May 14, 2007 compliance deadline; (ii) indicated compliance standards are to be developed by the industry within the telecommunications standards-setting bodies working together with law enforcement; (iii) permitted the use of certain third parties to satisfy CALEA compliance obligations; (iv) restricted the availability of compliance extensions; (v) concluded that facilities-based broadband Internet access providers and interconnected VoIP providers are responsible for any CALEA development and implementation costs; (vi) declared that the Federal Communications Commission may pursue enforcement action, in addition to remedies available through the courts, against any non-compliant provider; and (vii) adopted interim progress report filing requirements.

Broadband Internet-related and Internet protocol-services regulatory policies are continuing to develop, and it is possible that our broadband Internet access and VoIP services could be subject to additional regulations in the future. The extent of the regulations that will ultimately be applicable to these services and the impact of such regulations on the ability of providers to compete are currently unknown.

Spectrum Regulation

The Federal Communications Commission routinely reviews its spectrum policies and may change its position on spectrum allocations from time to time. The Federal Communications Commission is currently examining previously adopted rules for the 3650-3700 MHz spectrum band. Currently, this band is allocated for use to an unlimited number of operators pursuant to a link registration process. The Federal Communications Commission is currently reviewing these rules and could make significant changes to the licensing in this band. Similarly, the Federal Communications Commission has modified regulation in the 2.5 GHz BRS/EBS spectrum band and, from time to time, can modify or change spectrum allocations pursuant to rulemaking proceedings. We believe that the Federal Communications Commission is committed to allocating spectrum to support wireless broadband deployment throughout the United States and will continue to modify its regulations to foster such deployment, which will help us implement our existing and future business plans.

Table of Contents

Internet Taxation

The Internet Tax Non-Discrimination Act, which was passed by Congress in November 2004 and signed into law in December 2004, renewed and extended until November 2007 a moratorium on taxes on Internet access and multiple, discriminatory taxes on electronic commerce. This moratorium had previously expired in November 2003, and as with the preceding Internet Tax Freedom Act, ‘‘grandfathered’’ states that taxed Internet access prior to October 1998 to allow them to continue to do so. Certain states have enacted various taxes on Internet access or electronic commerce, and selected states’ taxes are being contested on a variety of bases. However, state tax laws may not be successfully contested and future state and federal laws imposing taxes or other regulations on Internet access and electronic commerce may arise, any of which could increase the cost of providing Internet services, which could, in turn, materially adversely affect our business.

Employees

As of March 1, 2007, we had 51 employees, approximately 14 of whom were administrative, 11 of whom were technicians and engineers and approximately 26 of whom were in sales. We believe our employee relations are good.

Property

Our executive offices are currently located in Middletown, Rhode Island, where we lease approximately 5,804 square feet of space. Pursuant to our lease, which expires on June 30, 2008, we are obligated to pay $6,288 per month until June 30, 2007 and then $6,771 for the balance of the lease. We do not own any real property.

We believe our office space is adequate for our immediate needs. Additional space may be required as we expand our activities. We do not foresee any significant difficulties in obtaining any required additional facilities.

Legal Proceedings

There are no legal proceedings pending or to our knowledge threatened against us.

Table of Contents

MANAGEMENT

The following table sets forth information regarding the members of our board of directors and our executive officers. All directors hold office for one-year terms until the election and qualification of their successors. Officers are elected annually by the board of directors and serve at the discretion of the board.


Name	Age		Position
Jeffrey M. Thompson		42	Chief Executive Officer, President and Director
Philip Urso		47	Chairman of the Board of Directors
George E. Kilguss, III		46	Chief Financial Officer
Arthur G. Giftakis		40	Vice President of Engineering and Operations
Howard L. Haronian, M.D.		45	Director
Paul Koehler		47	Director
William Bush		41	Director

Jeffrey M. Thompson, President, Chief Executive Officer and Director. Mr. Thompson co-founded us in October 1999 with Philip Urso. Since inception, Mr. Thompson has been a director and from inception until November 2005, Mr. Thompson was our chief operating officer. In November 2005, Mr. Thompson was promoted from chief operating officer to president and chief executive officer. In 1995, Mr. Thompson founded EdgeNet Inc., a privately held Internet service provider, and was vice president of operations of EdgeNet Inc. through 1999. EdgeNet Inc. was sold in 1997 to Citadel Broadcasting Corporation. Mr. Thompson holds a B.S. from the University of Massachusetts.

Philip Urso, Chairman of the Board of Directors. Mr. Urso co-founded us in October 1999 with Jeffrey M. Thompson. Mr. Urso has served as chairman of the board of directors since inception and was our chief executive officer from inception until July 2005. Prior to co-founding us, Mr. Urso was President of eFortress, an Internet service provider and division of Citadel Broadcasting Corporation. At the time, Citadel Broadcasting Corporation was a publicly held, national radio station group with over 100 stations. Mr. Urso, with Mr. Thompson, founded eFortress in 1995 and sold it to Citadel Broadcasting Corporation in 1997. From 1983 until 1997, Mr. Urso owned and operated a group of radio stations. In addition, Mr. Urso co-founded the regional cell-tower company, MCF Communications, Inc.

George E. Kilguss, III, Chief Financial Officer. Mr. Kilguss has been our chief financial officer since January 2004 and manages all of our finance and accounting activities. From November 2000 until December 2003, Mr. Kilguss was a private investor. From September 1998 until October 2000, Mr. Kilguss was chief financial officer of Stratos Global Corporation, a publicly traded company on the Toronto Stock Exchange. Mr. Kilguss was also an executive vice president of Stratos Global Corporation and served on its board of directors from April 1999 until October 2000. Mr. Kilguss holds a B.S. in Economics & Finance from the University of Hartford and an M.B.A. from the University of Chicago.

Arthur G. Giftakis, Vice-President of Engineering and Operations. Mr. Giftakis has served as our vice president of operations since 2004. From 2003 until 2004, Mr. Giftakis was our manager of engineering and prior to that, Mr. Giftakis was at Sockeye Networks, Inc., a border gateway protocol optimization company that was acquired by Internap Network Services Corporation in 2003. Before joining Sockeye Networks, Inc. in 2001, Mr. Giftakis held various solution architect positions at NaviSite, Inc. and Digital Broadband Communications Inc. after spending 10 years with Bell Atlantic Corp., now known as Verizon Communications Inc.

Howard L. Haronian, M.D., Director. Dr. Haronian has served as a director since inception in October 1999. Dr. Haronian is an interventional cardiologist and has been president of Cardiology Specialists, Ltd. of Rhode Island since 1994. Dr. Haronian has also been a member of the clinical faculty of the Yale School of Medicine since 1994 and has served as the director of the cardiac catheterization program at Yale-New Haven Hospital since 2003.

Table of Contents

Paul Koehler, Director. Mr. Koehler has served as a director since January 12, 2007. Mr. Koehler is the vice president of business development of Pacific Ethanol, Inc. (NasdaqGM: PEIX), a position he has held since June 2005. Mr. Koehler has over twenty years of experience in the electricity industry, having focused during the past five years on acquiring and developing wind power projects for PPM Energy, Inc., a subsidiary of Scottish Power plc. Prior to joining PPM Energy Inc., Mr. Koehler was the president and a founder of Kinergy Corporation, a consulting firm focused on renewable energy and risk management. In addition, Mr. Koehler was a co-founder of ReEnergy LLC, one of the companies acquired by Pacific Ethanol, Inc. During the 1990s, Mr. Koehler worked for Portland General Electric Company and Enron Corp. in marketing and origination of long term transactions, risk management, and energy trading. Mr. Koehler holds a B.A. from the Honors College at the University of Oregon.

William Bush, Director. Mr. Bush has served as a director since January 12, 2007. Mr. Bush has been an executive officer of Handheld Entertainment, Inc. (NasdaqCM: ZVUE) since January 2006 and became its chief financial officer on June 26, 2006. Mr. Bush has over 15 years of experience in accounting, financial support and business development. From 2002 to 2005, Mr. Bush was the chief financial officer and secretary for International Microcomputer Software, Inc. (OTCBB:IMSI.OB), a developer and distributor of precision design software, content and on-line services. Prior to that he was a director of business development and corporate controller for Buzzsaw.com, Inc. Mr. Bush was one of the founding members of Buzzsaw.com, Inc., a privately held company spun off from Autodesk, Inc. in 1999, focusing on online collaboration, printing and procurement applications. From 1997 to 1999, Mr. Bush worked as corporate controller at Autodesk, Inc. (NasdaqGM: ADSK), the fourth largest software applications company in the world. Prior to that, Mr. Bush worked for seven years in public accounting, first with Ernst & Young, and later with Price Waterhouse in Munich, Germany. Mr. Bush holds a B.S. in Business Administration from U.C. Berkeley and is a Certified Public Accountant.

Except for Howard L. Haronian and Philip Urso, who are cousins, there are no family relationships among our directors or executive officers.

Board Committees

The standing committees of our board of directors consist of an audit committee, a compensation committee and a nominating committee.

Audit Committee

The audit committee of the board of directors is currently comprised of Messrs. Bush, Haronian and Koehler, each of whom is an independent director. Mr. Bush is a qualified financial expert as defined in Item 407(d)(5)(ii) of Regulation S-B and serves as chairman of the audit committee. The audit committee’s duties are to recommend to our board of directors the engagement of independent auditors to audit our financial statements and to review our accounting and auditing principles. The audit committee reviews the scope, timing and fees for the annual audit and the results of audit examinations performed by the internal auditors and independent public accountants, including their recommendations to improve the system of accounting and internal controls. The audit committee will at all times be composed exclusively of directors who are, in the opinion of our board of directors, free from any relationship that would interfere with the exercise of independent judgment as a committee member and who possess an understanding of financial statements and generally accepted accounting principles.

Compensation Committee

The compensation committee of the board of directors is currently comprised of Messrs. Haronian and Bush. The compensation committee reviews and approves our salary and benefits policies, including compensation of executive officers. The compensation committee also administers our stock option plans and recommends and approves grants of stock options under such plans.

Table of Contents

Nominating Committee

We established a nominating committee of the board of directors, currently comprised of Messrs. Haronian and Koehler. The nominating committee considers and makes recommendations on matters related to the practices, policies and procedures of the board and takes a leadership role in shaping our corporate governance. As part of its duties, the committee assesses the size, structure and composition of the board and board committees, coordinates evaluation of board performance and reviews board compensation. The committee also acts as a screening and nominating committee for candidates considered for election to the board. In this capacity it concerns itself with the composition of the board with respect to depth of experience, balance of professional interests, required expertise and other factors. The committee evaluates prospective nominees identified on its own initiative or referred to it by other board members, management, stockholders or external sources and all self-nominated candidates. The committee uses the same criteria for evaluating candidates nominated by stockholders and self-nominated candidates as it does for those proposed by other board members, management and search companies.

Code of Ethics

Our board of directors has adopted a code of conduct and ethics that establishes the standards of ethical conduct applicable to all directors, officers and employees of our company. The code addresses, among other things, conflicts of interest, compliance with disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting, corporate opportunities and confidentiality requirements. The audit committee is responsible for applying and interpreting our code of conduct and ethics in situations where questions are presented to it.

Table of Contents

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Summary Compensation Table

The following table summarizes the annual and long-term compensation paid to our chief executive officer and our two other most highly compensated executive officers who were serving at the end of 2006, whom we refer to collectively in this prospectus as the ‘‘named executive officers’’:


Name and Principal Position	Year		Salary ($)		Bonus ($)			Option Awards⁽¹⁾ ($)			Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings ($)		Total ($)
Jeffrey M. Thompson		2006		171,000		75,000	⁽²⁾		413,837	⁽³⁾		10,000		669,837
President and Chief Executive Officer (principal executive officer)		2005		171,000		—			110,191			—		281,191
George E. Kilguss, III		2006		135,000		50,000			—			45,000		230,000
Chief Financial Officer		2005		55,000		—			110,191			125,000		290,191
Arthur Giftakis		2006		120,000		—			—			—		120,000
Vice President of Engineering and Operations		2005		114,313		—			21,514			—		135,827


(1)	Based upon the aggregate grant date fair value calculated in accordance with the Financial Accounting Standards Board Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 123R, Share Based Payment. For information regarding our valuation of option awards, see ‘‘Critical Accounting Policies — Stock-Based Expense.’’


(2)	Of this $75,000 cash bonus, $30,000 was awarded to Mr. Thompson in 2006 in recognition of services performed during 2006, and $45,000 was awarded to Mr. Thompson on February 14, 2007 in recognition of services performed during 2006.


(3)	This option award was made to Mr. Thompson on February 14, 2007 in recognition of services performed during 2006.

Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End

The following table summarizes the outstanding equity awards to our named executive officers as of December 31, 2006:


	Option Awards
Name	Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options Exercisable (#)		Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options Unexercisable (#)			Option Exercise Price ($)		Option Expiration Date
Jeffrey M. Thompson		280,309		—			0.78	4/29/2015
		175,193		—			1.43	2/28/2013
George E. Kilguss, III		175,193		—			1.43	4/26/2015
Arthur Giftakis		11,679		23,360	⁽¹⁾		1.43	8/29/2015
		59,566		—			1.43	11/17/2013


(1)	11,680 will vest on each of August 29, 2007 and August 29, 2008.

Table of Contents

2007 Equity Compensation Plan

Purpose of the 2007 Equity Compensation Plan

The 2007 Equity Compensation Plan provides a means for us to award specific equity-based benefits to officers and other employees, consultants and directors, of our company and our related companies and to encourage them to exercise their best efforts to enhance the growth of our company and our related companies.

Eligibility

Employees and consultants of our company and our related companies and non-employee directors of our company may receive awards under the 2007 Equity Compensation Plan. Only our employees or employees of our subsidiary companies, however, may receive incentive stock options under the 2007 Equity Compensation Plan.

Awards to be Offered

The 2007 Equity Compensation Plan provides for the granting of:


	•	incentive stock options and nonqualified stock options to purchase shares of our common stock;


	•	stock appreciation rights representing the right to receive an amount measured by the appreciation in share value;


	•	stock subject to time-based and/or performance-based vesting (restricted stock);


	•	restricted stock units representing the right to receive an amount measured by the value of a share of stock, subject to time-based and/or performance-based vesting;


	•	stock awarded as a bonus (bonus stock); and


	•	dividend equivalent rights.

Shares Subject to the Plan

The total number of shares of common stock that can be delivered under the 2007 Equity Compensation Plan is 2,403,922.

If any award that requires the participant to exercise the award for shares to be delivered terminates without having been exercised in full, if any shares subject to an award are forfeited, if any shares are withheld for the payment of taxes with respect to an award, or if any award payable in cash or shares is paid in cash rather than in shares, the unexercised portion of the award, the forfeited shares, the withheld shares, or the portion that was paid in cash will continue to be available for future awards. However, if an option, stock appreciation right, performance stock, performance stock units or bonus stock is cancelled or forfeited, the shares subject to such awards will continue to be counted against the maximum number of shares specified above for which options, stock appreciation rights, performance stock, performance stock units or bonus stock may be granted to an employee in any calendar year.

In addition, the aggregate fair market value, determined at the time the option is granted, of shares with respect to which incentive stock options are exercisable for the first time by any participant during any calendar year, under the 2007 Equity Compensation Plan and under any other incentive stock option plan of our company or a related company, may not exceed $100,000.

Administration, Amendment and Duration of the Plan

The 2007 Equity Compensation Plan is administered by the compensation committee of the board of directors, except that our chief executive officer may grant a limited number of options to participants other than to himself, other executive officers who are ‘‘covered employees’’ under

Table of Contents

Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, directors and consultants. Except as noted in the previous sentence, the compensation committee selects the participants who will receive awards, determines the type of award to be granted and determines the terms and conditions of the award.

Stock Options

The compensation committee may award incentive stock options and nonqualified stock options under the 2007 Equity Compensation Plan. Only our employees may receive incentive stock options. The compensation committee also determines the exercise price of each option. However, the exercise price of an option may not be less than 100% of the fair market value of the underlying shares on the date of grant or 110% in the case of an incentive stock option granted to a stockholder beneficially owning 10% or more of our common stock. The exercise price of any option may not be less than the par value of the underlying share(s).

The compensation committee determines the term of each option, but no term may exceed 10 years from the date of grant, or 5 years in the case of an incentive stock option granted to a stockholder beneficially owning 10% or more of our common stock. The compensation committee also determines at what time or times each option may be exercised and any conditions that must be met before an option may be exercised. Options may be made exercisable in installments, and the exercisability of options may be accelerated by the compensation committee.

The exercise price of an option granted under the 2007 Equity Compensation Plan may be paid:


	•	in full in cash or cash equivalents;


	•	by shares of stock that the participant already owns;


	•	by shares of stock newly acquired on exercise of the option;


	•	by delivery of an irrevocable undertaking by a broker to deliver promptly to us sufficient funds to pay the exercise price; or


	•	by any combination of the above.

Stock Appreciation Rights

The compensation committee may grant stock appreciation rights that entitle the participant to receive upon exercise an amount, either in shares, cash, or a combination of both, measured by the increase since the date of grant in the value of the shares covered by the right. The compensation committee may accelerate the date(s) on which stock appreciation rights may be exercised.

Restricted Stock

The compensation committee may grant shares of restricted stock, for any or no consideration, subject to any restrictions the compensation committee establishes. Except with respect to restricted stock whose restrictions lapse upon the attainment of performance goals under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, the compensation committee may accelerate the date(s) on which the restrictions will lapse. Before the lapse of restrictions on shares of restricted stock, the participant will have voting and dividend rights on the shares.

The compensation committee may provide that restricted stock vests only upon the satisfaction of performance goals. The compensation committee may select one or more performance criteria from the following list: sales, revenues, profit, return on sales, net operating profit after taxes, investment turnover, customer service indices, funds from operations, income from operations, return on assets, return on net assets, asset turnover, return on equity, return on capital, market price appreciation of shares, economic value added, total stockholder return, net income, pre-tax income, earnings per share, operating profit margin, net income margin, sales margin, cash flow, market share, sales growth, revenue, net revenue growth, capacity utilization, customer penetration, increase in customer base, net income growth, expense control and/or hiring of personnel. The criteria may apply to the individual, a division, our company or a subsidiary of our company.

Table of Contents

Restricted Stock Units

The compensation committee may grant restricted stock units subject to any restrictions the compensation committee may determine. A restricted stock unit entitles a participant to receive, with respect to a vested restricted stock unit, one share of our common stock, the cash value thereof, or a combination of both. Restricted stock units are credited to a bookkeeping account in the participant’s name.

Although a participant will not have voting or dividend rights with respect to his or her restricted stock units, a participant will have dividend equivalent rights on his or her restricted stock units. On each date that we pay a cash dividend to holders of our common stock, an additional number of restricted stock units equal to the total number of restricted stock units credited to the participant’s bookkeeping account on such date, multiplied by the dollar amount of the per share cash dividend, and divided by the fair market value of a share on such date will be credited to the participant’s account. Restricted stock units attributable to such dividend equivalent rights will accumulate and vest at the same time as the restricted stock units to which they relate vest.

The compensation committee may provide that restricted stock units vest only to the extent performance goals. The compensation committee may select one or more performance criteria from the above list for restricted stock.

Bonus Stock

The compensation committee may grant awards entitling a participant to receive shares without payment therefor as a bonus for services provided to our company or a related company. Bonus stock is fully vested on the date of grant.

Dividend Equivalent Rights

The compensation committee may grant a separate award entitling a participant to receive dividend equivalent rights. Such dividend equivalent rights shall accumulate and be paid shortly after they vest. Once vested, they shall be paid at the same time corresponding cash dividends are paid to stockholders.

Treatment of Awards upon Termination of Service

If a participant’s service terminates for any reason, including death or disability, all options and stock appreciation rights then held by the participant that were not exercisable immediately before the termination of service will terminate on that date, except as otherwise stated in the participant’s award agreement. Any remaining options and stock appreciation rights will remain exercisable for one year from the date of termination of service by reason of death or disability, three months from the date of termination of service for any other reason, or for a shorter or longer period as stated in the participant’s award agreement. Notwithstanding the post-termination exercise periods described above, no option or stock appreciation right may be exercised beyond its original term.

Except as otherwise stated in a participant’s award agreement, if a participant holds shares of restricted stock and terminates service for any reason, including death or disability, before the lapse of the restrictions, the participant will forfeit the shares to us. Except as otherwise stated in a participant’s award agreement, restricted stock units and dividend equivalent rights to which a participant has not become entitled will terminate irrevocably upon the participant’s termination of service for any reason, including death or disability.

Transferability

Awards generally are not transferable, except by will or under the laws of descent and distribution. The compensation committee has the authority, however, to permit a participant to transfer nonqualified stock options and stock appreciation rights.

Adjustments in Shares; Corporate Transactions

If a stock dividend, stock split, reverse split, spin-off, or similar change in capitalization occurs, the compensation committee will make appropriate adjustments to the maximum number and type of

Table of Contents

shares that may be subject to awards and delivered under the 2007 Equity Compensation Plan, the kind and aggregate number of shares to outstanding awards, the exercise price of outstanding options, and the amount over which appreciation of an outstanding stock appreciation right is measured.

If a corporate transaction such as a merger, consolidation, acquisition of property or stock, separation, reorganization or liquidation occurs, each outstanding award will be assumed by the surviving or successor entity, except that the compensation committee may elect to terminate all or a portion of any outstanding award, effective upon the closing of the corporate transaction, if the compensation committee determines that doing so is in our best interests. If so, the compensation committee will give each participant holding an option and stock appreciation right not less than seven days’ notice before the termination to exercise any such option or stock appreciation right that is to be so terminated, to the extent it is then exercisable, before the termination. Further, in the event of a corporate transaction, the compensation committee in its discretion, may:


	•	accelerate the date on which options, stock appreciation rights and restricted stock units vest; and/or


	•	remove restrictions from outstanding shares of restricted stock.

The compensation committee may also change the terms of any outstanding award to reflect the corporate transaction, subject to certain limitations. Finally, the compensation committee or the board of directors may, in lieu of the actions described above, arrange to have the surviving or acquiring entity grant the participant a replacement award that, in the judgment of the compensation committee, is substantially equivalent to the replaced award.

Director Compensation

The following table summarizes the compensation awarded to our directors in 2006:


Name	Fees Earned or Paid in Cash ($)		Option Awards ($)⁽¹⁾		Total ($)
Philip Urso		24,000		—		24,000
Howard L. Haronian		—		25,299		25,299
Paul Koehler		—		—		—
William Bush		—		—		—


(1)	Based upon the aggregate grant date fair value calculated in accordance with the Financial Accounting Standards Board Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 123R, Share Based Payment. For information regarding our valuation of option awards, see ‘‘Critical Accounting Policies — Stock-Based Expense.’’

Pursuant to the 2007 Equity Compensation Plan, each non-employee director is entitled to receive ten-year options to purchase 10,000 shares of our common stock at an exercise price equal to the fair market value of our common stock on the date of grant upon such non-employee director’s initial election or appointment to the board of directors and annually thereafter, plus 2,500 addition shares of common stock for committee or board chairpersons, $25,000 per annum in cash, plus $1,000 per meeting attended in person or by telephone, and $500 per committee meeting.

On October 24, 2006, Howard L. Haronian received a one time grant of an option to purchase 35,039 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $1.43 per share.

Table of Contents

CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS

On August 2, 2002, we borrowed $250,000 from Natale and Elizabeth Urso, Philip Urso’s parents, and issued a promissory note in the original principal amount of $250,000. This note provided for interest at the rate of 10% per annum and was due and payable within 60 days of demand.

On April 1, 2003, we borrowed $253,000 from Philip Urso and issued Mr. Urso a promissory note, dated April 1, 2003, in the original principal amount of $253,000. On November 30, 2004, we borrowed an additional $100,000 from Mr. Urso and issued Mr. Urso a promissory note, dated November 30, 2004, in the original principal amount of $100,000. On August 1, 2005, we consolidated all of our outstanding obligations to Mr. Urso under one instrument, by cancelling each of the foregoing promissory notes and issuing Mr. Urso a single consolidated note for the principal sum of $360,564.04 to account for the $65,251.34 outstanding under the April 1, 2003 note, the $106,694.31 outstanding under the November 30, 2004 note, $111,959.24 of deferred compensation in 2004 and $76,659.15 of deferred compensation in 2005. This consolidated note provided for interest at the rate of 5% per annum and was due and payable on August 1, 2008. Mr. Urso, however, had the right to convert up to 50% of the note’s unpaid balance into shares of common stock at a conversion price of $1.00 per share.

On December 7, 2005, we borrowed $250,000 from Mr. Urso and issued Mr. Urso a promissory note, dated December 7, 2005, in the original principal amount of $250,000. This note provided for interest at the rate of 10% per annum and was due and payable on December 7, 2006. Mr. Urso, however, had the right to convert all of the note’s unpaid balance into shares of common stock at a conversion price of $1.00 per share.

On January 13, 2006, we borrowed $250,000 from Mr. Urso and issued Mr. Urso a promissory note, dated January 13, 2006, in the original principal amount of $250,000. This note provided for interest at the rate of 10% per annum and was due and payable within 60 days of demand.

On July 12, 2006, we borrowed $50,000 from Mr. Urso and issued Mr. Urso a promissory note, dated July 12, 2006, in the original principal amount of $50,000. This note provided for interest at the rate of 10% per annum and was due and payable within 60 days of demand.

On October 1, 2006, we borrowed $125,000 from Mr. Urso and issued Mr. Urso a promissory note, dated October 1, 2006, in the original principal amount of $125,000. This note provided for interest at the rate of 10% per annum and was due and payable within 60 days of demand.

On September 7, 2004, we borrowed $150,000 from George E. Kilguss, III and issued Mr. Kilguss a promissory note, dated September 7, 2004, in the original principal amount of $150,000. This note provided for interest at the rate of 10% per annum and was due and payable on September 7, 2007. Mr. Kilguss, however, had the right to convert all of the note’s unpaid balance into shares of common stock at a purchase price of $0.80 per share.

On January 1, 2005, Mr. Kilguss agreed to defer $125,000 of his 2005 compensation. The deferred compensation accrued interest at a rate of 10% per annum. The deferred compensation and accrued interest was due on December 31, 2006. Mr. Kilguss, however, had the right to convert any amount of the balance not paid into shares of common stock at a conversion price of $1.00 per share.

On January 1, 2006, Mr. Kilguss agreed to defer and additional $45,000 of his 2006 compensation. The deferred compensation accrued interest at a rate of 10% per annum. The deferred compensation and accrued interest was due on December 31, 2006. Mr. Kilguss, however, had the right to convert any amount of the balance not paid into shares of common stock at a conversion price of $1.00 per share.

On October 1, 2006, we borrowed $150,000 from Howard L. Haronian and issued Dr. Haronian a promissory note, dated October 1, 2006, in the original principal amount of $150,000. This note provided for interest at the rate of 10% per annum and was due and payable within 60 days of demand.

On January 4, 2007, the aggregate outstanding principal and interest on the above promissory notes was $1,691,636. On such date, each of the noteholders sold their notes to a group of unaffiliated third parties pursuant to our issuing each of the note purchasers new notes that:

Table of Contents


	•	were due and payable on January 4, 2008;


	•	accrued interest at the rate of 10% per annum; and


	•	became automatically convertible into shares of common stock at a conversion price of $1.50 per share upon our merger with and into a publicly traded company.

When Towerstream Corporation merged with and into University Girls Calendar, Ltd. on January 12, 2007, these new January 4, 2007 notes converted into 1,127,575 shares of common stock.

On November 10, 2005, we borrowed $250,000 from Howard L. Haronian and issued Dr. Haronian a promissory note, dated November 10, 2005, in the original principal amount of $250,000. The note provided for interest at the rate of 10% per annum and was due and payable on November 10, 2006. Dr. Haronian, however, had the right to convert all of the note’s unpaid balance into shares of common stock at a conversion price of $1.00 per share. On January 12, 2007, immediately following our merger with and into University Girls Calendar, Ltd., Dr. Haronian converted this note into 174,825 shares of our common stock at an adjusted conversion price of $1.43 per share.

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT

The following table sets forth information with respect to the beneficial ownership of our common stock as of March 16, 2007 by:


	•	each person known by us to beneficially own more than 5.0% of our common stock;


	•	each of our directors;


	•	each of the named executive officers; and


	•	all of our directors and executive officers as a group.

The percentages of common stock beneficially owned are reported on the basis of regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission governing the determination of beneficial ownership of securities. Under the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission, a person is deemed to be a beneficial owner of a security if that person has or shares voting power, which includes the power to vote or to direct the voting of the security, or investment power, which includes the power to dispose of or to direct the disposition of the security. Except as indicated in the footnotes to this table, each beneficial owner named in the table below has sole voting and sole investment power with respect to all shares beneficially owned and each person’s address is c/o Towerstream Corporation, 55 Hammarlund Way, Middletown, Rhode Island 02842, unless otherwise indicated. As of March 16, 2007, we had 23,724,950 shares outstanding.


Name and Address of Beneficial Owner	Number of Shares Beneficially Owned⁽¹⁾			Percentage Beneficially Owned⁽¹⁾
Jeffrey M. Thompson		2,528,350	⁽²⁾		10.38	%
Philip Urso		4,162,728	⁽³⁾		17.29	%
George E. Kilguss, III		1,107,219	⁽⁴⁾		4.76	%
Arthur G. Giftakis		71,246	⁽⁵⁾			*
Howard L. Haronian		1,898,161	⁽⁶⁾		8.00	%
Paul Koehler		—			—
William Bush		—			—
All directors and executive officers as a group (7 persons)		9,767,704			39.15	%


	* Less than 1%.


(1)	Shares of common stock beneficially owned and the respective percentages of beneficial ownership of common stock assumes the exercise of all options, warrants and other securities convertible into common stock beneficially owned by such person or entity currently exercisable or

Table of Contents

exercisable within 60 days of March 16, 2007. Shares issuable pursuant to the exercise of stock options and warrants exercisable within 60 days are deemed outstanding and held by the holder of such options or warrants for computing the percentage of outstanding common stock beneficially owned by such person, but are not deemed outstanding for computing the percentage of outstanding common stock beneficially owned by any other person.


(2)	Includes 175,193 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of warrants and 455,502 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of options.


(3)	Includes 350,386 shares of common stock held by Mr. Urso’s minor children, 175,193 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of warrants and 175,193 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of options.


(4)	Includes 175,193 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of options.


(5)	Includes 71,246 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of options.


(6)	Includes 1,723,336 shares of common stock held as joint tenants with Dr. Horonian’s spouse.

SELLING STOCKHOLDERS

Up to 12,273,925 shares of common stock are being offered by this prospectus, all of which are being registered for sale for the accounts of the selling security holders and include the following:


	•	5,110,056 shares of common stock that were issued to accredited investors in connection with private placements in January 2007;


	•	2,555,028 shares of common stock underlying warrants exercisable at $4.50 per share that were issued to accredited investors in connection with private placements in January 2007;


	•	1,272,728 shares of common stock underlying $3,500,000 of debentures that are convertible at $2.75 per share that were issued to accredited investors in connection with a private placement on January 18, 2007;


	•	636,364 shares of common stock underlying warrants exercisable at $4.00 per share that were issued to accredited investors in connection with a private placement on January 18, 2007;


	•	636,364 shares of common stock underlying warrants exercisable at $6.00 per share that were issued to accredited investors in connection with a private placement on January 18, 2007;


	•	204,553 shares of common stock underlying warrants exercisable at $4.50 per share that were issued to placement agents in connection with private placements on January 12, 2007 and January 18, 2007;


	•	1,458,832 shares of common stock that were issued upon the conversion of $2,191,636 in indebtedness on January 12, 2007; and


	•	400,000 shares of common stock underlying warrants that are presently exercisable at $0.71 per share.

Each of the transactions by which the selling stockholders acquired their securities from us was exempt under the registration provisions of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.

The shares of common stock referred to above are being registered to permit public sales of the shares, and the selling stockholders may offer the shares for resale from time to time pursuant to this prospectus. The selling stockholders may also sell, transfer or otherwise dispose of all or a portion of their shares in transactions exempt from the registration requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or pursuant to another effective registration statement covering those shares. We may from time to time include additional selling stockholders in supplements or amendments to this prospectus.

The table below sets forth certain information regarding the selling stockholders and the shares of our common stock offered by them in this prospectus. The selling stockholders have not had a material relationship with us within the past three years other than as described in the footnotes to

Table of Contents

the table below or as a result of their acquisition of our shares or other securities. To our knowledge, subject to community property laws where applicable, each person named in the table has sole voting and investment power with respect to the shares of common stock set forth opposite such person’s name.

Beneficial ownership is determined in accordance with the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission. In computing the number of shares beneficially owned by a selling stockholder and the percentage of ownership of that selling stockholder, shares of common stock underlying shares of our convertible debentures or warrants held by that selling stockholder that are convertible or exercisable, as the case may be, within 60 days of March , 2007, are included. Those shares, however, are not deemed outstanding for the purpose of computing the percentage ownership of any other selling stockholder. Each selling stockholder’s percentage of ownership of our outstanding shares in the table below is based upon 23,724,950 shares of common stock outstanding as of March 16, 2007. With respect to the convertible debentures and warrants held by DKR SoundShore Oasis Holding Fund Ltd. and Harborview Master Fund L.P., there exist contractual provisions limiting conversion and exercise to the extent such conversion or exercise would cause such selling stockholder, together with its affiliates or members of a ‘‘group’’, to beneficially own a number of shares of common stock which would exceed 4.99% of our then outstanding shares of common stock following such conversion or exercise. The shares and percentage ownership of our outstanding shares indicated in the table below do not give effect to this limitation.


	Ownership Before Offering						After Offering⁽¹⁾
Selling Stockholder	Number of shares of common stock beneficially owned			Number of shares offered			Number of shares of common stock beneficially owned		Percentage of common stock beneficially owned
Colman Furlong Profit Sharing Plan & Trust⁽²⁾		150,000	⁽³⁾		150,000	⁽³⁾		—		—
Victor M. Dandridge, III		75,000	⁽⁴⁾		75,000	⁽⁴⁾		—		—
Robert S. Colman Trust UDT 3/13/1985⁽⁵⁾		541,667	⁽⁶⁾		375,000	⁽⁶⁾		—		—
Heller Capital Investments⁽⁷⁾		508,333	⁽⁸⁾		508,333	⁽⁸⁾		—		—
Sandor Capital Master Fund, L.P.⁽⁹⁾		540,000	⁽¹⁰⁾		540,000	⁽¹⁰⁾		—		—
Chocolate Chip Investments LP⁽¹¹⁾		150,000	⁽³⁾		150,000	⁽³⁾		—		—
Harold E. Gelber Revocable Trust⁽¹²⁾		37,500	⁽¹³⁾		37,500	⁽¹³⁾		—		—
Elinor Ganz IRA Rollover⁽¹⁴⁾		67,500	⁽¹³⁾		37,500	⁽¹³⁾		30,000	*
Aharon Ungar and Jennifer B. Ungar		37,500	⁽¹³⁾		37,500	⁽¹³⁾		—		—
Laura Berlin		37,500	⁽¹³⁾		37,500	⁽¹³⁾		—		—
Alfred Gladstone		37,500	⁽¹³⁾		37,500	⁽¹³⁾		—		—
Jack W. Kuhn Jr. Revocable Trust UAD 12/11/2000⁽¹⁵⁾		37,500	⁽¹³⁾		37,500	⁽¹³⁾		—		—
New Britain Radiological Associates 401(k) Plan FBO Alfred Gladstone⁽¹⁶⁾		37,500	⁽¹³⁾		37,500	⁽¹³⁾		—		—
New Britain Radiological Associates 401(k) Plan FBO Sydney Ulreich⁽¹⁷⁾		75,000	⁽⁴⁾		75,000	⁽⁴⁾		—		—
George Wild Markham		525,000	⁽¹⁸⁾		525,000	⁽¹⁸⁾		—		—
Tamsey Smith Markham		225,000	⁽¹⁹⁾		225,000	⁽¹⁹⁾		—		—
Robert E. Cottrell		26,667	⁽²⁰⁾		26,667	⁽²⁰⁾		—		—
John R. Dufresne		53,334	⁽²¹⁾		53,334	⁽²¹⁾		—		—
Ferris Baker Watts, Inc. Custodian FBO Mark Nicosia IRA⁽²²⁾		150,000	⁽³⁾		150,000	⁽³⁾		—		—
Ken Root		18,000	⁽²³⁾		18,000	⁽²³⁾		—		—
Ariel Funding LLC⁽²⁴⁾		75,000	⁽⁴⁾		75,000	⁽⁴⁾		—		—
Susan E. Saxton		18,750	⁽²⁵⁾		18,750	⁽²⁵⁾		—		—
Gary Gratny		75,000	⁽⁴⁾		75,000	⁽⁴⁾		—		—
Alon D. Kutai		16,667	⁽²⁶⁾		16,667	⁽²⁶⁾		—		—
Bedrock Capital LP⁽²⁷⁾		166,667	⁽²⁸⁾		166,667	⁽²⁸⁾		—		—
Brian Barton		75,000	⁽⁴⁾		75,000	⁽⁴⁾		—		—
T2, Ltd.⁽²⁹⁾		166,667	⁽²⁸⁾		166,667	⁽²⁸⁾		—		—

Table of Contents


	Ownership Before Offering						After Offering⁽¹⁾
Selling Stockholder	Number of shares of common stock beneficially owned			Number of shares offered			Number of shares of common stock beneficially owned			Percentage of common stock beneficially owned
Precept Capital Master Fund, G.P.⁽³⁰⁾		150,000	⁽³⁾		150,000	⁽³⁾		—			—
James C. Barragan		50,000	⁽³¹⁾		50,000	⁽³¹⁾		—			—
Peddle Partners LLP⁽³²⁾		97,500	⁽¹³⁾		67,500	⁽¹³⁾		30,000		*
Forest Hill Select Offshore, Ltd.⁽³³⁾		416,300	⁽³⁴⁾		416,300	⁽³⁴⁾		—			—
Forest Hill Select Fund, LP⁽³⁵⁾		583,700	⁽³⁶⁾		583,700	⁽³⁶⁾		—			—
Lacuna Hedge Fund LLLP⁽³⁷⁾		1,000,000	⁽³⁸⁾		1,000,000	⁽³⁸⁾		—			—
Frank Trimboli		75,000	⁽⁴⁾		75,000	⁽⁴⁾		—			—
London Family Trust⁽³⁹⁾		333,333	⁽⁴⁰⁾		333,333	⁽⁴⁰⁾		—			—
Chase Mortgage, Inc.⁽⁴¹⁾		350,000	⁽³⁾		350,000	⁽³⁾		—			—
Clarion Capital Corporation⁽⁴²⁾		187,500	⁽⁴³⁾		187,500	⁽⁴³⁾		—			—
Phyllis Ulreich		83,334	⁽⁴⁴⁾		83,334	⁽⁴⁴⁾		—			—
Scott Christie ‘‘Keogh’’⁽⁴⁵⁾		75,000	⁽⁴⁾		75,000	⁽⁴⁾		—			—
Marvin Mermelstein		75,000	⁽⁴⁾		75,000	⁽⁴⁾		—			—
Sugarman Investment LC⁽⁴⁶⁾		37,500	⁽¹³⁾		37,500	⁽¹³⁾		—			—
Robert A. Inman, Jr.		75,000	⁽⁴⁾		75,000	⁽⁴⁾		—			—
Sunrise Equity Partners LP⁽⁴⁷⁾		166,667	⁽²⁸⁾		166,667	⁽²⁸⁾		—			—
Lagunitas Partners LP⁽⁴⁸⁾		400,000	⁽⁸⁾		400,000	⁽⁸⁾		—			—
Gruber & McBaine International⁽⁴⁹⁾		125,000	⁽⁵⁰⁾		125,000	⁽⁵⁰⁾		—			—
Jon D. and Linda W. Gruber Trust⁽⁵¹⁾		131,250	⁽⁵⁰⁾		131,250	⁽⁵⁰⁾		—			—
Agile Partners, LP⁽⁵²⁾		150,000	⁽³⁾		150,000	⁽³⁾		—			—
Barry Honig		1,075,505	⁽⁵³⁾		379,424	⁽⁵³⁾		696,081			2.93	%
Chad Brownstein		30,000			30,000			—			—
Jonah Schnel		10,000			10,000			—			—
John S. Lemak IRA Rollover⁽⁵⁴⁾		100,000			100,000			—			—
DKR SoundShore Oasis Holding Fund Ltd.⁽⁵⁵⁾		2,397,223	⁽⁵⁶⁾		2,333,333	⁽⁵⁶⁾		63,890		*
Harborview Master Fund, L.P.⁽⁵⁷⁾		645,456	⁽⁵⁸⁾		645,456	⁽⁵⁸⁾		—			—
Howard L. Haronian⁽⁵⁹⁾		1,898,161	⁽⁶⁰⁾		174,825			1,723,336	⁽⁶⁰⁾		7.26	%
Charles B. Ganz TTEE Abraham Ganz Trustee for Great Grandchildren U/A Dtd 11/21/90⁽⁶¹⁾		24,000			12,000			12,000		*
Ganz Family Foundation⁽⁶²⁾		38,000			30,000			8,000		*
Fidelity Investment fbo Elinor Ganz IRA Rollover⁽⁶³⁾		30,000			30,000			—			—
Elinor Ganz, Trustee Under Trust Agreement Amy H. Ganz dtd 9/28/84⁽⁶⁴⁾		40,000			20,000			20,000		*
Elinor Ganz Trustee Under Trust Agreement Susan Ganz dtd 9/28/84⁽⁶⁵⁾		40,000			20,000			20,000		*
Nexcore Capital, Inc.⁽⁶⁶⁾		7,194	⁽⁶⁷⁾		7,194	⁽⁶⁷⁾		—			—
Ardent Advisors LLC⁽⁶⁸⁾		28,778	⁽⁶⁹⁾		28,778	⁽⁶⁹⁾		—			—
John Lemak⁽⁷⁰⁾		102,444	⁽⁷¹⁾		102,444	⁽⁷¹⁾		—			—
Palladium Capital Advisors, LLC⁽⁷²⁾		66,136	⁽⁷³⁾		66,136	⁽⁷³⁾		—			—


	* Less than 1%.

(1)

Represents the amount of shares that will be held by the selling stockholders after completion of this offering based on the assumptions that (a) all shares registered for sale by the registration statement of which this prospectus is part will be sold and (b) that no other shares of our common stock beneficially owned by the selling stockholders are acquired or are sold prior to completion of this offering by the selling stockholders. However, the selling stockholders may sell all, some or none of the shares offered pursuant to this prospectus and may sell other shares of our common stock that they may own pursuant to another registration statement under the Securities Act of 1933 or sell some or all of their shares pursuant to an

Table of Contents


	exemption from the registration provisions of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, including under Rule 144. To our knowledge there are currently no agreements, arrangements or understanding with respect to the sale of any of the shares that may be held by the selling stockholders after completion of this offering or otherwise.


(2)	Robert S. Colman is the trustee of the Colman Furlong Profit Sharing Plan & Trust and, in such capacity, may be deemed to have voting and dispositive power over the securities held for the account of this selling stockholder.


(3)	Includes 50,000 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of warrants.


(4)	Includes 25,000 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of warrants.


(5)	Robert S. Colman is the trustee of the Robert S. Colman Trust UDT 3/13/1985 and, in such capacity, may be deemed to have voting and dispositive power over the securities held for the account of this selling stockholder.


(6)	Includes 125,000 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of warrants.


(7)	Ronald Heller is the managing director of Heller Capital Investments and, in such capacity, may be deemed to have voting and dispositive power over the securities held for the account of this selling stockholder.


(8)	Includes 100,000 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of warrants.

(9)

John S. Lemak is the general partner of Sandor Capital Master Fund, L.P. and, in such capacity, may be deemed to have voting and dispositive power over the securities held for the account of this selling stockholder. Sandor Capital Mater Fund, L.P. is an affiliate of WFG Investments, Inc., a registered broker-dealer. Sandor Capital Master Fund, L.P. bought the shares of common stock in the ordinary course of business, and at the time of the purchase of the shares of common stock to be resold, had no agreements or understandings directly or indirectly with any person to distribute the shares of common stock.


(10)	Includes 180,000 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of warrants.


(11)	Stratum Wealth Management LLC has the discretionary right to make investment decisions with respect to the shares held by Chocolate Chip Investments LP. Charles B. Ganz is a principal of Stratum Wealth Management LLC and, in such capacity, may be deemed to have voting and dispositive power over the securities held for the account of this selling stockholder.


(12)	Stratum Wealth Management LLC has the discretionary right to make investment decisions with respect to the shares held by the Harold E. Gelber Revocable Trust. Charles B. Ganz is a principal of Stratum Wealth Management LLC and, in such capacity, may be deemed to have voting and dispositive power over the securities held for the account of this selling stockholder.


(13)	Includes 12,500 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of warrants.


(14)	Stratum Wealth Management LLC has the discretionary right to make investment decisions with respect to the shares held by the Elinor Ganz IRA Rollover. Charles B. Ganz is a principal of Stratum Wealth Management LLC and, in such capacity, may be deemed to have voting and dispositive power over the securities held for the account of this selling stockholder.


(15)	Stratum Wealth Management LLC has the discretionary right to make investment decisions with respect to the shares held by the Jack W. Kuhn Jr. Revocable Trust UAD 12/11/2000. Charles B. Ganz is a principal of Stratum Wealth Management LLC and, in such capacity, may be deemed to have voting and dispositive power over the securities held for the account of this selling stockholder.


(16)	Stratum Wealth Management LLC has the discretionary right to make investment decisions with respect to the shares held by the New Britain Radiological Associates 401(k) Plan FBO Alfred Gladstone. Charles B. Ganz is a principal of Stratum Wealth Management LLC and, in

Table of Contents


	such capacity, may be deemed to have voting and dispositive power over the securities held for the account of this selling stockholder.

(17)

Stratum Wealth Management LLC has the discretionary right to make investment decisions with respect to the shares held by the New Britain Radiological Associates 401(k) Plan FBO Sydney Ulreich. Charles B. Ganz is a principal of Stratum Wealth Management LLC and, in such capacity, may be deemed to have voting and dispositive power over the securities held for the account of this selling stockholder.


(18)	Includes 175,000 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of warrants.


(19)	Includes 75,000 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of warrants.


(20)	Includes 8,889 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of warrants.


(21)	Includes 17,778 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of warrants.


(22)	Mark Nicosia is the administrator of the Ferris Baker Watts, Inc. Custodian FBO Mark Nicosia IRA and, in such capacity, may be deemed to have voting and dispositive power over the securities held for the account of this selling stockholder.


(23)	Includes 6,000 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of warrants.


(24)	Robert Daniel is the president of Ariel Funding LLC and, in such capacity, may be deemed to have voting and dispositive power over the securities held for the account of this selling stockholder.


(25)	Includes 6,250 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of warrants.


(26)	Includes 5,556 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of warrants.


(27)	Jim Smith is the manager of Bedrock Capital LP and, in such capacity, may be deemed to have voting and dispositive power over the securities held for the account of this selling stockholder.


(28)	Includes 55,556 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of warrants.


(29)	Jim Smith is the manager of T2, Ltd. and, in such capacity, may be deemed to have voting and dispositive power over the securities held for the account of this selling stockholder.


(30)	D. Blair Baker is the general partner of Precept Capital Master Fund, G.P. and, in such capacity, may be deemed to have voting and dispositive power over the securities held for the account of this selling stockholder.


(31)	Includes 16,667 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of warrants.


(32)	Stratum Wealth Management LLC has the discretionary right to make investment decisions with respect to the shares held by Peddle Partners LLP. Charles B. Ganz is a principal of Stratum Wealth Management LLC and, in such capacity, may be deemed to have voting and dispositive power over the securities held for the account of this selling stockholder.


(33)	Mark Lee is the manager of Forest Hill Select Offshore, Ltd. and, in such capacity, may be deemed to have voting and dispositive power over the securities held for the account of this selling stockholder.


(34)	Includes 138,767 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of warrants.


(35)	Mark Lee is the manager of Forest Hill Select Fund, LP and, in such capacity, may be deemed to have voting and dispositive power over the securities held for the account of this selling stockholder.


(36)	Includes 194,567 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of warrants.

Table of Contents


(37)	Rawleigh Ralls is the managing partner of Lacuna Hedge Fund LLLP and, in such capacity, may be deemed to have voting and dispositive power over the securities held for the account of this selling stockholder.


(38)	Includes 333,333 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of warrants.


(39)	Robert S. London is the trustee of London Family Trust and, in such capacity, may be deemed to have voting and dispositive power over the securities held for the account of this selling stockholder.


(40)	Includes 111,111 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of warrants.


(41)	Mark Herskovitz is Vice President and a control person of Chase Mortgage, Inc., and, in such capacity, may be deemed to have voting and dispositive power over the securities held for the account of this selling stockholder.


(42)	Morton A. Cohen is the chairman of Clarion Capital Corporation, and, in such capacity, may be deemed to have voting and dispositive power over the securities held for the account of this selling stockholder.


(43)	Includes 62,500 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of warrants.


(44)	Includes 27,778 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of warrants.


(45)	Scott Christie is the administrator of the Scott Christie ‘‘Keogh’’, and, in such capacity, may be deemed to have voting and dispositive power over the securities held for the account of this selling stockholder.


(46)	Howard P. Sugarman is a member of Sugarman Investment LC and, in such capacity, may be deemed to have voting and dispositive power over the securities held for the account of this selling stockholder.


(47)	Marilyn S. Adler is the general partner of Sunrise Equity Partners LP, and, in such capacity, may be deemed to have voting and dispositive power over the securities held for the account of this selling stockholder.


(48)	Jon D. Gruber is the general partner of Gruber & McBaine Capital Management, the general partner of Lagunitas Partners LP and, in such capacity, may be deemed to have voting and dispositive power over the securities held for the account of this selling stockholder.


(49)	Jon D. Gruber is the general partner of Gruber & McBaine Capital Management, the general partner of Gruber & McBaine International and, in such capacity, may be deemed to have voting and dispositive power over the securities held for the account of this selling stockholder.


(50)	Includes 33,333 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of warrants.


(51)	Jon D. Gruber is the trustee of the Jon D. and Linda W. Gruber Trust and, in such capacity, may be deemed to have voting and dispositive power over the securities held for the account of this selling stockholder.


(52)	Scott H. Cummings is the general partner of Agile Partners, LP, and, in such capacity, may be deemed to have voting and dispositive power over the securities held for the account of this selling stockholder.


(53)	Includes 350,000 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of warrants.


(54)	John S. Lemak is the administrator of the John S. Lemak IRA Rollover, and, in such capacity, may be deemed to have voting and dispositive power over the securities held for the account of this selling stockholder. Mr. Lemak is an affiliate of WFG Investments, Inc., a registered broker-dealer. Mr. Lemak bought the shares of common stock in the ordinary course of

Table of Contents


	business and at the time of the purchase of the shares of common stock to be resold, had no agreements or understandings directly or indirectly with any person to distribute the shares of common stock.

(55)

The investment manager of DKR SoundShore Oasis Holding Fund Ltd. is DKR Oasis Management Company LP. DKR Oasis Management Company LP has the authority to do any and all acts on behalf of DKR SoundShore Oasis Holding Fund Ltd., including voting any shares held by DKR SoundShore Oasis Holding Fund Ltd. Mr. Seth Fischer is the managing partner of Oasis Management Holdings LLC, one of the general partners of DKR Oasis Management Company LP. Mr. Fischer has ultimate responsibility for investments with respect to DKR SoundShore Oasis Holding Fund Ltd.. Mr. Fischer disclaims beneficial ownership of the shares.


(56)	Includes 1,000,000 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of warrants and 1,000,000 shares of common stock issuable upon the conversion of convertible debentures.


(57)	Harborview Master Fund L.P. is a master fund in a master-feeder structure whose general partner is Harborview Advisors LLC. Richard Rosenblum and David Stefansky are the managers of Harborview Advisors LLC and have ultimate responsibility for trading with respect to Harborview Master Fund L.P. Messrs. Rosenblum and Stefansky disclaim beneficial ownership of the shares being registered hereunder.


(58)	Includes 272,728 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of warrants and 272,728 shares of common stock issuable upon the conversion of convertible debentures.


(59)	Howard Haronian has been a member of our board of directors since 1999.


(60)	Includes 1,723,336 shares of common stock held as joint tenants with Dr. Horonian’s spouse.


(61)	Charles B. Ganz is the trustee of the Charles B. Ganz TTEE Abraham Ganz Trustee for Great Grandchildren U/A Dtd. 11/21/90 and, in such capacity, may be deemed to have voting and dispositive power over the securities held for the account of this selling stockholder.


(62)	Stratum Wealth Management LLC has the discretionary right to make investment decisions with respect to the shares held by the Ganz Family Foundation. Charles B. Ganz is a principal of Stratum Wealth Management LLC and, in such capacity, may be deemed to have voting and dispositive power over the securities held for the account of this selling stockholder.


(63)	Stratum Wealth Management LLC has the discretionary right to make investment decisions with respect to the shares held by Fidelity Investment fbo Elinor Ganz IRA Rollover. Charles B. Ganz is a principal of Stratum Wealth Management LLC and, in such capacity, may be deemed to have voting and dispositive power over the securities held for the account of this selling stockholder.


(64)	Elinor Ganz is the trustee of Elinor Ganz, Trustee Under Trust Agreement Amy H. Ganz dtd 9/28/84 and, in such capacity, may be deemed to have voting and dispositive power over the securities held for the account of this selling stockholder.


(65)	Elinor Ganz is the trustee of Elinor Ganz, Trustee Under Trust Agreement Susan Ganz dtd 9/28/84 and, in such capacity, may be deemed to have voting and dispositive power over the securities held for the account of this selling stockholder.

(66)

Brian Corbman is the principal of Nexcore Capital, Inc. and, in such capacity, may be deemed to have voting and dispositive power over the securities held for the account of this selling stockholder. Nexcore Capital, Inc. is an affiliate of Ardent Advisors, LLC, a registered broker-dealer. Ardent Advisors, LLC served as one of our placement agents in connection with our private placements of common stock and warrants that occurred on January 12, 2007 and January 18, 2007.


(67)	Includes 7,194 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of warrants.

Table of Contents

(68)

Brian Corbman is the principal of Ardent Advisors, LLC and, in such capacity, may be deemed to have voting and dispositive power over the securities held for the account of this selling stockholder. Ardent Advisors, LLC is a registered broker-dealer and served as one of our placement agents in connection with our private placements of common stock and warrants that occurred on January 12, 2007 and January 18, 2007.


(69)	Includes 28,778 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of warrants.


(70)	John Lemak is an affiliate of WFG Investments, Inc., a registered broker-dealer. WFG Investments, Inc. served as one of our placement agents in connection with our private placements of common stock and warrants that occurred on January 12, 2007 and January 18, 2007.


(71)	Includes 102,444 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of warrants.

(72)

Joel Padowitz is the chief executive officer of Palladium Capital Advisors, LLC and, in such capacity, may be deemed to have voting and dispositive power over the securities held for the account of this selling stockholder. Palladium Capital Advisors, LLC is a registered broker-dealer and served as one of our placement agents in connection with our private placements of common stock and warrants and debentures and warrants that occurred on January 12, 2007 and January 18, 2007.


(73)	Includes 66,136 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of warrants.


(74)	Includes 400,000 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of warrants.

Table of Contents

DESCRIPTION OF SECURITIES

We are authorized to issue 70,000,000 shares of common stock and 5,000,000 shares of preferred stock. On March 16, 2007, there were 23,724,950 shares of common stock issued and outstanding and no shares of preferred stock issued and outstanding.

Common Stock

The holders of common stock are entitled to one vote per share. Our certificate of incorporation does not provide for cumulative voting. The holders of our common stock are entitled to receive ratably such dividends, if any, as may be declared by the board of directors out of legally available funds. Upon liquidation, dissolution or winding-up, the holders of our common stock are entitled to share ratably in all assets that are legally available for distribution. The holders of our common stock have no preemptive, subscription, redemption or conversion rights. The rights, preferences and privileges of holders of our common stock are subject to, and may be adversely affected by, the rights of the holders of any series of preferred stock, which may be designated solely by action of the board of directors and issued in the future.

Preferred Stock

The board of directors is authorized, subject to any limitations prescribed by law, without further vote or action by the stockholders, to issue from time to time shares of preferred stock in one or more series. Each such series of preferred stock shall have such number of shares, designations, preferences, voting powers, qualifications, and special or relative rights or privileges as shall be determined by the board of directors, which may include, among others, dividend rights, voting rights, liquidation preferences, conversion rights and preemptive rights.

Convertible Debentures

On January 18, 2007 we issued $3,500,000 of 8% senior convertible debentures. These debentures are due December 31, 2009 and convertible, in whole or in part, at each holder’s option, into shares of our common stock at an initial conversion price of $2.75 per share. Should we, at any time while the debentures are outstanding, sell or grant any option to purchase or sell or grant any right to reprice, or otherwise dispose of or issue any common stock entitling any party to acquire shares of our common stock at a per share less than $2.75, the conversion price of the debentures shall be reduced to equal that lower price.

The debentures provide for us to pay interest on the aggregate unconverted and then outstanding principal amount of the debentures at the rate of 8% per annum, payable quarterly in arrears on January 1, April 1, July 1 and October 1 of each year, commencing January 1, 2008. So long as a resale registration statement is in effect with respect to the shares of common stock underlying the debentures, interest is payable in either cash or common stock, at our option. If interest is paid in common stock, however, the shares shall be valued at 90% of the 10 day volume weighted average price of our common stock prior to the interest payment date. In the event that there is an effective registration statement on file with the Securities and Exchange Commission with respect to the common stock underlying the debentures and the closing bid price for the 10 trading days prior to an interest payment date is $3.44 or greater, the interest payment for that period will be waived. Moreover, if there is an effective registration statement on file with the Securities and Exchange Commission with respect to the common stock underlying the debenture and the 10 day volume weighted average price of our common stock exceeds $5.50 for 10 consecutive trading days, we have the right to force the debenture holders to convert their debentures into common stock upon 10 days prior written notice.

The debentures are our senior indebtedness and we, generally, may not pledge or grant a lien on any of our assets without the debenture holders’ consent. In addition, for one year following issuance of the debentures, the holders of the debentures hold a right of first refusal to participate in any future equity or equity-linked financing conducted by us other than a traditional bank financing. The

Table of Contents

amount of this right is pro rata, with the each debenture holder’s portion equal to a fraction, the numerator of which is the amount of the debenture purchased by such holder and the denominator of which is the sum of the amount of the debenture purchased by such holders and $11,497,625, the aggregate purchase price for the units of common stock and warrants issued pursuant to the private placements that closed on January 12, 2007 and January 18, 2007.

Warrants

Debenture Warrants

In connection with the issuance of our debentures, we issued the debenture holders five-year warrants to purchase up to an aggregate of 1,272,728 shares of common stock, with 50% of such warrants having an initial exercise price of $4.00 per share and 50% having an initial exercise price of $6.00 per share. This exercise price must be tendered in cash unless an effective registration statement registering the resale of the shares of common stock underlying the warrants is not available at any time after January 12, 2008, in which case the warrants may also be exercised by means of a ‘‘cashless exercise.’’

These warrants provide the holders with weighted average anti-dilution protection. Moreover, in the event that any adjustment is made in the conversion price of the debentures, the exercise price of these warrants shall be adjusted to a price that is equal to 145% of the adjusted conversion price for the $4.00 warrants, and 218% of the adjusted conversion price for the $6.00 warrants.

Investor Warrants

In connection with our unit offerings completed on January 12, 2007 and January 18, 2007, we issued investors five-year warrants to purchase up to an aggregate of 2,555,028 shares of common stock at an initial exercise price of $4.50 per share. This exercise price must be tendered in cash unless an effective registration statement registering the resale of the shares of common stock underlying the warrants is not available at any time after January 12, 2008, in which case the warrants may also be exercised by means of a ‘‘cashless exercise.’’

These warrants provide the holders with weighted average anti-dilution protection. Moreover, should we issue or sell any shares of common stock or securities convertible into common stock for a consideration per share of common stock less than $2.25 anytime on or before January 18, 2008, the warrant exercise price shall be reduced to an amount equal to 200% of the new issuance price. Upon each such adjustment of the exercise price, the number of shares issuable under each warrant shall be increased to equal the product of the former exercise price and the former number of shares of common stock issuable under such warrant divided by the as adjusted exercise price. To the extent any warrant has been exercised in whole or in part prior to such a dilutive issuance, we shall promptly issue to each warrant holder that number of shares of common stock equal to the difference of the adjusted number of shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of the previously exercised warrant and the number of shares of common stock acquirable upon exercise of such warrant immediately prior to such adjustment.

Placement Agent Warrants

In connection with the issuance of the debentures and the units on January 12, 2007 and January 18, 2007, we issued three placement agents warrants to purchase up to an aggregate of 204,553 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $4.50 per share. These warrants provide the placement agents with weighted average anti-dilution protection.

Existing Warrants

In addition to the foregoing, there are presently warrants outstanding to purchase up to an aggregate of 340,015 shares of common stock at exercise prices ranging from $0.71 to $2.14 per share, with a weighted average exercise price of $0.89 per share. These warrants provide the placement agents with weighted average anti-dilution protection.

Table of Contents

Registration Rights

Shares Underlying the Debentures and Debenture Warrants

On January 16, 2007, in connection with our sale of the debentures, we entered into a registration rights agreement with the holders of the debentures, pursuant to which we agreed to provide certain registration rights with respect to the shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of the debentures and the debenture warrants. Specifically, we agreed to file a registration statement with the Securities and Exchange Commission covering the resale of the shares of common stock underlying the debentures and debenture warrants on or before March 29, 2007 and to cause such registration statement to be declared effective by the Securities and Exchange Commission on or before May 28, 2007. If the registration statement is either not filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission by March 29, 2007 or not declared effective by the Securities and Exchange Commission by May 28, 2007, we must pay liquidated damages to the holders of the debentures equal to 1% of the debenture purchase price per month of delinquency with a maximum amount of damages of 6% of the debenture purchase price.

Pursuant to the registration rights agreement, we must maintain the effectiveness of the registration statement from the effective date until the earlier of 18 months after the effectiveness date or the date on which all securities registered under the registration statement have been sold, subject to our right to suspend or defer the use of the registration statement in certain events.

The registration rights agreement also contains a ‘‘market standoff’’ provision pursuant to which each debenture holder agreed that if we undertake an underwritten public offering in an amount of at least $20,000,000 anytime during the period in which we must keep the registration statement effective, such holders shall not offer, sell, pledge or otherwise transfer or dispose of our securities for a period not to exceed the earlier of 180 days following the date of a final prospectus relating to such public offering or January 18, 2008, subject to certain exemptions.

Shares Underlying the Investor Warrants

On January 18, 2007, in connection with our sale of units of common stock and warrants, we entered into a registration rights agreement with the unit purchasers pursuant to which we agreed to provide certain registration rights with respect to the common stock issued and the common stock issuable upon exercise of the investor warrants. Specifically, we agreed to file a registration statement with the Securities and Exchange Commission covering the resale of the common stock issued and underlying the warrants on or before March 19, 2007 and to cause such registration statement to be declared effective by the Securities and Exchange Commission on or before May 28, 2007. If the registration statement is either not filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission by March 19, 2007 or not declared effective by the Securities and Exchange Commission by May 28, 2007, we must pay liquidated damage to the unit investors equal to 1% of the unit purchase price per month of delinquency with a maximum amount of damages of 6% of the unit purchase price.

Pursuant to the registration rights agreement, we must maintain the effectiveness of the registration statement until the earlier of 18 months after the effectiveness date or the date on which all securities registered under the registration statement have been sold, subject to our right to suspend or defer the use of the registration statement in certain events.

The registration rights agreement also contains a ‘‘market standoff’’ provision pursuant to which each unit investor agreed that if we undertake an underwritten public offering in an amount of at least $20,000,000 anytime during the period in which we must keep the registration statement effective, such investors shall not offer, sell, pledge or otherwise transfer or dispose of our securities for a period not to exceed the earlier of 180 days following the date of a final prospectus relating to such public offering or January 18, 2008, subject to certain exemptions.

Shares Underlying the Placement Agent Warrants

Each of the placement agent warrants state that should we file a registration statement with the Securities and Exchange Commission covering the sale of our common stock, other than a registration

Table of Contents

statement on Form S-4, S-8 or similar form, then the placement agents shall have the right to require us to register the resale of the shares of common stock underlying the placement agent warrants on such registration statement.

Lock-up Agreements

Unit Lock-Up Agreement

On January 12, 2007, in connection with our sale of units of common stock and warrants, each of our executive officers, directors and the beneficial holders of more than 10% of our common stock entered into a lock-up agreement pursuant to which they agreed not to sell or otherwise transfer any of their shares of common stock until January 12, 2008, with the exception of bona fide gifts, transfers to a family trust, contributions made to non-profit organizations qualified as charitable organizations under Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, or transfers by operation of law, in each case, provided the transferees agree, in writing, to be bound by the terms of the lock-up agreement for the balance of the lock-up period.

Debenture Lock-Up Agreement

On January 16, 2007, in connection with our sale of debentures, each of our executive officers, directors and the beneficial holders of more than 10% of our common stock entered into a lock-up agreement pursuant to which they agreed not to sell or otherwise transfer any of their shares of common stock until 30 trading days following the date the registration statement, of which this prospectus forms a part, is declared effective by the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Anti-Takeover Effect of Delaware Law, Certain Charter and By-Law Provisions

Our certificate of incorporation and bylaws contain provisions that could have the effect of discouraging potential acquisition proposals or tender offers or delaying or preventing a change of control of our company. These provisions are as follows:


	•	they provide that special meetings of stockholders may be called only by a resolution adopted by a majority of our board of directors;


	•	they provide that only business brought before an annual meeting by our board of directors or by a stockholder who complies with the procedures set forth in the bylaws may be transacted at an annual meeting of stockholders;


	•	they provide for advance notice of specified stockholder actions, such as the nomination of directors and stockholder proposals;


	•	they do not include a provision for cumulative voting in the election of directors. Under cumulative voting, a minority stockholder holding a sufficient number of shares may be able to ensure the election of one or more directors. The absence of cumulative voting may have the effect of limiting the ability of minority stockholders to effect changes in our board of directors; and


	•	they allow us to issue, without stockholder approval, up to 5,000,000 shares of preferred stock that could adversely affect the rights and powers of the holders of our common stock.

We are subject to the provisions of Section 203 of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware, an anti-takeover law. In general, Section 203 prohibits a publicly held Delaware corporation from engaging in a ‘‘business combination’’ with an ‘‘interested stockholder’’ for a period of three years after the date of the transaction in which the person became an interested stockholder, unless the business combination is approved in a prescribed manner. For purposes of Section 203, a ‘‘business combination’’ includes a merger, asset sale or other transaction resulting in a financial benefit to the interested stockholder, and an ‘‘interested stockholder’’ is a person who, together with affiliates and associates, owns, or within three years prior did own, 15% or more of the voting stock of a corporation.

Table of Contents

Indemnification of Directors and Officers

Section 145 of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware provides, in general, that a corporation incorporated under the laws of the State of Delaware, as we are, may indemnify any person who was or is a party or is threatened to be made a party to any threatened, pending or completed action, suit or proceeding (other than a derivative action by or in the right of the corporation) by reason of the fact that such person is or was a director, officer, employee or agent of the corporation, or is or was serving at the request of the corporation as a director, officer, employee or agent of another enterprise, against expenses (including attorneys’ fees), judgments, fines and amounts paid in settlement actually and reasonably incurred by such person in connection with such action, suit or proceeding if such person acted in good faith and in a manner such person reasonably believed to be in or not opposed to the best interests of the corporation and, with respect to any criminal action or proceeding, had no reasonable cause to believe such person’s conduct was unlawful. In the case of a derivative action, a Delaware corporation may indemnify any such person against expenses (including attorneys’ fees) actually and reasonably incurred by such person in connection with the defense or settlement of such action or suit if such person acted in good faith and in a manner such person reasonably believed to be in or not opposed to the best interests of the corporation, except that no indemnification will be made in respect of any claim, issue or matter as to which such person will have been adjudged to be liable to the corporation unless and only to the extent that the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware or any other court in which such action was brought determines such person is fairly and reasonably entitled to indemnity for such expenses.

Our certificate of incorporation and bylaws provide that we will indemnify our directors, officers, employees and agents to the extent and in the manner permitted by the provisions of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware, as amended from time to time, subject to any permissible expansion or limitation of such indemnification, as may be set forth in any stockholders’ or directors’ resolution or by contract. Any repeal or modification of these provisions approved by our stockholders will be prospective only and will not adversely affect any limitation on the liability of any of our directors or officers existing as of the time of such repeal or modification.

We are also permitted to apply for insurance on behalf of any director, officer, employee or other agent for liability arising out of his actions, whether or not the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware would permit indemnification.

Disclosure of Commission Position on Indemnification for Securities Act Liabilities

Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, may be permitted to our directors, officers and persons controlling us, we have been advised that it is the Securities and Exchange Commission’s opinion that such indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and is, therefore, unenforceable.

PLAN OF DISTRIBUTION

The selling stockholders may sell all or a portion of the shares of common stock beneficially owned by them and offered hereby from time to time directly or through one or more underwriters, broker-dealers or agents. If the shares of common stock are sold through underwriters or broker-dealers, the selling stockholders will be responsible for underwriting discounts or commissions or agent’s commissions. The shares of common stock may be sold in one or more transactions at fixed prices, at prevailing market prices at the time of the sale, at varying prices determined at the time of sale or at negotiated prices. These sales may be effected in transactions, which may involve crosses or block transactions,


	•	on any national securities exchange or quotation service on which the securities may be listed or quoted at the time of sale;


	•	in the over-the-counter market;


	•	in transactions otherwise than on these exchanges or systems or in the over-the-counter market;

Table of Contents


	•	through the writing of options, whether such options are listed on an options exchange or otherwise;


	•	ordinary brokerage transactions and transactions in which the broker-dealer solicits purchasers;


	•	block trades in which the broker-dealer will attempt to sell the shares as agent but may position and resell a portion of the block as principal to facilitate the transaction;


	•	purchases by a broker-dealer as principal and resale by the broker-dealer for its account;


	•	an exchange distribution in accordance with the rules of the applicable exchange;


	•	privately negotiated transactions;


	•	short sales;


	•	sales pursuant to Rule 144 under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended;


	•	broker-dealers may agree with the selling stockholders to sell a specified number of such shares at a stipulated price per share;


	•	a combination of any such methods of sale; and


	•	any other method permitted by applicable law.

If the selling stockholders effect such transactions by selling shares of common stock to or through underwriters, broker-dealers or agents, such underwriters, broker-dealers or agents may receive commissions in the form of discounts, concessions or commissions from the selling stockholders or commissions from purchasers of the shares of common stock for whom they may act as agent or to whom they may sell as principal. These discounts, concessions or commissions as to particular underwriters, broker-dealers or agents may be in excess of those customary in the types of transactions involved. In connection with sales of the shares of common stock or otherwise, the selling stockholders may enter into hedging transactions with broker-dealers who may, in turn, engage in short sales of the shares of common stock in the course of hedging in positions they assume. The selling stockholders may also sell shares of common stock short and deliver shares of common stock covered by this prospectus to close out short positions and to return borrowed shares in connection with such short sales. The selling stockholders may also loan or pledge shares of common stock to broker-dealers that in turn may sell such shares.

The selling stockholders may pledge or grant a security interest in some or all of the shares of common stock owned by them and, if they default in the performance of their secured obligations, the pledgees or secured parties may offer and sell the shares of common stock from time to time pursuant to this prospectus or any amendment to this prospectus under Rule 424(b)(3) or other applicable provision of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, amending, if necessary, the list of selling stockholders to include the pledgee, transferee or other successors in interest as selling stockholders under this prospectus. The selling stockholders also may transfer and donate the shares of common stock in other circumstances in which case the transferees, donees, pledgees or other successors in interest will be the selling beneficial owners for purposes of this prospectus.

The selling stockholders and any broker-dealer participating in the distribution of the shares of common stock may be deemed to be ‘‘underwriters’’ within the meaning of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and any commission paid, or any discounts or concessions allowed to, any such broker-dealer may be deemed to be underwriting commissions or discounts under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. At the time a particular offering of the shares of common stock is made, a prospectus supplement, if required, will be distributed which will set forth the aggregate amount of shares of common stock being offered and the terms of the offering, including the name or names of any broker-dealers or agents, any discounts, commissions and other terms constituting compensation from the selling stockholders and any discounts, commissions or concessions allowed or re-allowed or paid to broker-dealers.

Under the securities laws of some states, the shares of common stock may be sold in such states only through registered or licensed brokers or dealers. In addition, in some states the shares of

Table of Contents

common stock may not be sold unless such shares have been registered or qualified for sale in such state or an exemption from registration or qualification is available and is complied with.

There can be no assurance that any selling stockholder will sell any or all of the shares of common stock registered by the registration statement of which this prospectus forms a part.

The selling stockholders and any other person participating in such distribution will be subject to applicable provisions of the Exchange Act and the rules and regulations thereunder, including, without limitation, Regulation M of the Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, which may limit the timing of purchases and sales of any of the shares of common stock by the selling stockholders and any other participating person. Regulation M may also restrict the ability of any person engaged in the distribution of the shares of common stock to engage in market-making activities with respect to the shares of common stock. All of the foregoing may affect the marketability of the shares of common stock and the ability of any person or entity to engage in market-making activities with respect to the shares of common stock.

We will pay all expenses of the registration of the shares of common stock pursuant to the registration rights agreement that we entered into with the selling stockholders; however, the selling stockholders will pay all underwriting discounts and selling commissions, if any.

We will indemnify the selling stockholders against liabilities, including liabilities under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, in accordance with the registration rights agreement, or the selling stockholders will be entitled to contribution. We may be indemnified by the selling stockholders against liabilities, including liabilities under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, that may arise from any written information furnished to us by the selling stockholder specifically for use in this prospectus, in accordance with the registration rights agreement, or we may be entitled to contribution.

LEGAL MATTERS

Haynes and Boone, LLP, New York, New York, will pass upon the validity of the shares of our common stock offered by the selling stockholders under this prospectus. A partner with Haynes and Boone, LLP holds shares of our common stock and an option to purchase common stock.

EXPERTS

The financial statements as of December 31, 2006, and for the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005 included in this prospectus have been audited by Marcum & Kliegman LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report appearing herein and elsewhere in the registration statement, and are included in reliance upon the report of such firm given upon their authority as experts in accounting and auditing.

WHERE YOU CAN FIND ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

We have filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission a registration statement on Form SB-2, together with any amendments and related exhibits, under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, with respect to our shares of common stock offered by this prospectus. The registration statement contains additional information about us and our shares of common stock that the selling stockholders are offering in this prospectus.

We file annual, quarterly and current reports and other information with the Securities and Exchange Commission under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Our Securities and Exchange Commission filings are available to the public over the Internet at the Securities and Exchange Commission’s website at http://www.sec.gov. You may also read and copy any document we file at the Securities and Exchange Commission’s public reference room located at 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549. Please call the Securities and Exchange Commission at 1-800-SEC-0330 for further information on the public reference rooms and their copy charges. In addition, through our website, http://www.towerstream.com, you can access electronic copies of documents we file with the

Table of Contents

Securities and Exchange Commission, including our Annual Report on Form 10-KSB, our Quarterly Reports on Form 10-QSB, and Current Reports on Form 8-K and any amendments to those reports. Information on our website is not incorporated by reference in this prospectus. Access to those electronic filings is available as soon as practicable after filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission. You may also request a copy of those filings, excluding exhibits, from us at no cost. Any such request should be addressed to us at: 55 Hammarlund Way, Middletown, Rhode Island 02842, Attention: George E. Kilguss, III, Chief Financial Officer.

TOWERSTREAM CORPORATION

INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

F-1

Table of Contents

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors
Towerstream Corporation
Middletown, Rhode Island

We have audited the accompanying balance sheet of Towerstream Corporation (the ‘‘Company’’) as of December 31, 2006, and the related statements of operations, stockholders’ equity and cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audits include consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Towerstream Corporation as of December 31, 2006, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

/s/ Marcum & Kliegman LLP

New York, New York
February 10, 2007, except for Note 15 (l) and (m), as to which the date is March 12, 2007

F-2

Table of Contents

TOWERSTREAM CORPORATION
BALANCE SHEET
December 31, 2006


Assets
Current Assets
Cash	$	160,363
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $107,245		157,443
Prepaid expenses		25,202
Total Current Assets		343,008
Property and equipment, net		3,758,585
FCC License		350,000
Security deposits and other assets		61,685
Total assets	$	4,513,278
Liabilities and Stockholder’s Equity
Current Liabilities
Short-term debt	$	259,341
Current maturities of capital lease obligations		62,685
Current maturities of notes payable, stockholders		1,797,611
Accounts payable and accrued expenses		966,357
Deferred compensation		180,000
Deferred revenues		400,766
Total current liabilities		3,666,760
Other Liabilities
Notes payable, stockholder, net of current maturities		74,400
Capital lease obligations, net of current maturities		73,315
Total other liabilities		147,715
Total liabilities		3,814,475
Commitments
Stockholder’s Equity
Preferred stock, par value $0.001; 5,000,000 shares authorized; none issued		—
Common stock, par value $0.001; 70,000,000 shares authorized; 15,000,000 shares issued and outstanding		15,000
Additional paid-in capital		8,896,803
Accumulated deficit		(8,213,000	)
Total stockholders’ equity		698,803
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	4,513,278

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements

F-3

Table of Contents

TOWERSTREAM CORPORATION
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS


	Years Ended December 31,
	2006				2005
Revenues		$	6,296,218			$	5,397,510
Operating Expenses
Cost of revenues (exclusive of depreciation of $1,206,250 and $933,557, respectively, shown separately below)			1,636,820				1,509,505
Depreciation			1,206,250				933,557
Customer support services			507,276				419,356
Selling, general and administrative expenses (includes stock-based compensation expense of $100,625 in 2006)			3,636,376				3,265,352
Total operating expenses			6,986,722				6,127,770
Operating loss			(690,504	)			(730,260	)
Other Expense/(Income)
Interest expense, net			237,071				216,945
Gain on extinguishment of debt			(114,339	)			—
Gain on sale of property and equipment			(1,705	)			—
Total other expense			121,027				216,945
Net loss		$	(811,531	)		$	(947,205	)
Net loss per common share – basic and diluted		$	(0.05	)		$	(0.07	)
Weighted average common shares outstanding			14,910,457				14,559,843

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements

F-4

Table of Contents

TOWERSTREAM CORPORATION
STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Years Ended December 31, 2006 and 2005


	Common Stock				Additional Paid-in Capital			Accumulated Deficit			Total
	Shares		Amount		Additional Paid-in Capital			Accumulated Deficit			Total
Balance as of January 1, 2005		14,011,716		14,012		$	7,479,207		($6,454,264	)		$	1,038,955
Sale of common stock		648,214		648			924,352						925,000
Issuance of common stock upon conversion of stockholder’s notes		83,120		83			59,223						59,306
Net loss									($947,205	)			(947,205	)
Balance as of January 1, 2006		14,743,050		14,743			8,462,782		(7,401,469	)			1,076,056
Issuance of common stock upon conversion of stockholder’s notes payable and accrued interest		186,873		187			233,466						233,653
Issuance of common stock in connection with purchase of FCC license		70,077		70			99,930						100,000
Stock-based compensation							100,625						100,625
Net loss									(811,531	)			(811,531	)
Balance at December 31, 2006		15,000,000		15,000		$	8,896,803		($8,213,000	)		$	698,803

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements

F-5

Table of Contents

TOWERSTREAM CORPORATION
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS


	Years Ended December 31,
	2006				2005
Cash Flows From Operating Activities
Net loss		$	(811,531	)		$	(947,205	)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation			1,206,250				933,557
Provision for doubtful accounts			62,245				114,293
Amortization of deferred debt discount			19,830				12,292
Gain on extinguishment of debt			(114,339	)			—
Non-cash charge for interest			42,916				—
Gain on sale of property and equipment			(1,705	)			—
Employee stock-based compensation			100,625				—
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable			(46,038	)			(77,204	)
Advances, net to officers			35,533				(5,775	)
Prepaid expenses and other current assets			(16,381	)			4,331
Accounts payable and accrued expenses			486,881				128,229
Deferred compensation			55,000				202,312
Deferred revenues			(51,556	)			114,455
Total Adjustments			1,779,261				1,426,490
Net cash provided by operating activities			967,730				479,285
Cash Flows From Investing Activities
Acquisition of property and equipment			(1,126,597	)			(1,369,527	)
Proceeds from sale of property and equipment			5,988				—
Purchase of FCC license			(50,000	)			—
Change in security deposits			2,500				(8,500	)
Net Cash used in investing activities			(1,168,109	)			(1,378,027	)
Cash Flows From Financing Activities
Bank overdraft			—				(29,407	)
Repayment of revolving note, stockholder			(250,000	)			—
Proceeds from notes payable, stockholders			575,000				500,000
Repayment of notes payable, stockholder			(116,643	)			(106,237	)
Proceeds from short-term debt borrowings			250,000				—
Repayment of capital lease obligations			(33,948	)			(13,344	)
Repayment of long-term debt			(266,717	)			(174,220	)
Proceeds from sales of common stock			—				925,000
Net cash provided by financing activities			157,692				1,101,792
Net (decrease) increase in cash			(42,687	)			203,050
Cash-Beginning of year			203,050				—
Cash-End of year		$	160,363			$	203,050
Supplemental Disclosures of Cash Flow Information
Cash paid during the year for:
Interest		$	218,037			$	176,900
Non-cash investing and financing activities:
Conversion of deferred compensation into notes payable		$	—			$	195,312
Conversion of principal and interest on notes payable into shares of common stock		$	233,653			$	59,306
Acquisition of property and equipment in exchange for shares of common stock		$	100,000			$	—
Acquisition of FCC license in exchange for note payable		$	200,000			$	—
Acquisition of property and equipment under capital lease obligations		$	122,008			$	—

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements

F-6

Table of Contents

TOWERSTREAM CORPORATION

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Note 1. Organization and Nature of Business

Towerstream Corporation (herein after referred to as ‘‘Towerstream’’ or the ‘‘Company’’) was formed on December 17, 1999 and was incorporated in Delaware. The Company operated as a Sub Chapter S corporation with its corporate headquarters located in Rhode Island.

The Company is a fixed wireless broadband provider. The Company serves several major U.S. markets including: Los Angeles, San Francisco, New York City, Chicago, Boston, Seattle, Providence and Newport, Rhode Island.

On January 12, 2007, Towerstream merged with a newly formed subsidiary of University Girls Calendar, Ltd. (‘‘UGC’’), a publicly traded shell company. The stockholders of the Company received .7007716 share of UGC common stock in exchange for each share of Towerstream common stock. As a result of the transaction, the former owners of Towerstream became the controlling stockholders of UGC and UGC changed its name to Towerstream Corporation. Accordingly, the merger of Towerstream and UGC (the ‘‘Merger’’) is deemed to be a reverse merger that has been accounted for as a recapitalization of Towerstream (see Note 15). All references to shares and per share amounts in the accompanying financial statements have been restated to reflect the aforementioned exchange.

Note 2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Accounts Receivable. The Company carries its accounts receivable at cost less an allowance for doubtful accounts. The allowance for doubtful accounts reflects management’s best estimate of probable losses inherent in the accounts receivable balance. Periodically, management evaluates its accounts receivable and establishes an allowance for doubtful accounts, based on the history of past write-offs, collections, and current credit conditions. The allowance for uncollectible accounts at December 31, 2006 was $107,245 and bad debt expense for 2006 and 2005 was approximately $62,000 and $114,000, respectively and are included as part of selling, general, and administrative expenses.

Property and Equipment. Property and equipment are stated at cost. The costs associated with the construction of the network and subscriber installations are capitalized. Costs include equipment, installation costs and materials. Depreciation is computed by the straight-line method over the following estimated useful lives:


	Years
Furniture, fixtures and equipment		5-7
Computer equipment		5
Systems software		3
Network and base station equipment		5-7
Customer premise equipment		5-7

Expenditures for maintenance and repairs, which do not generally extend the useful life of the assets, are charged to operations as incurred. Gains or losses on disposal of property and equipment are reflected in the statement of operations in the period of disposal.

FCC License. Federal Communication Commission (‘‘FCC’’) license is initially recorded at cost and is not amortized. FCC license is considered to be an indefinite-lived intangible asset because the Company expects to continue to provide wireless service using the relevant license for the foreseeable future and the FCC license may be renewed for a nominal fee.

Deferred Revenues. Deferred revenues consist of either prepayment of services for future periods or payments received for current month services which overlap monthly reporting periods.

Use of Estimates. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates

F-7

Table of Contents

and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Advertising Costs. The Company charges advertising costs to expense as incurred. Advertising costs for the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005 were approximately $44,000 and $240,000, respectively and are included as part of selling, general, and administrative expenses.

Income Tax Status. The Company, with the consent of its stockholders, has elected to be taxed under sections of the federal and the state of Rhode Island income tax law, which provide that, in lieu of corporation income taxes, the stockholders separately account for their pro rata shares of the Company’s items of income, deductions, losses and credits. As a result of this election, no provision or liability for income taxes has been recognized in the accompanying financial statements.

Research and Development. Research and development costs are expensed as incurred. Research and development costs for the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005 were approximately $59,000 and $130,000, respectively. These costs have been recorded in the statement of operations as part of selling, general and administrative expenses.

Long-Lived Assets. Long-lived assets consist primarily of property and equipment. Long-lived assets are reviewed annually for impairment or whenever events or circumstances indicate their carrying value may not be recoverable. When such events or circumstances arise, an estimate of the future undiscounted cash flows produced by the asset, or the appropriate grouping of assets, is compared to the asset’s carrying value to determine if impairment exists pursuant to the requirements of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (‘‘SFAS’’) No. 144, ‘‘Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets’’. If the asset is determined to be impaired, the impairment loss is measured based on the excess of its carrying value over its fair value. Assets to be disposed of are reported at the lower of their carrying value or net realizable value.

Management has determined there was no impairment of its property and equipment during the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005.

Revenue Recognition. Revenues are recognized at the time access to the Company’s internet services is made available to its customers. Contractual arrangements range from one to three years. Deferred revenues are recognized as a liability when billings are received in advance of the date when revenues are earned. Company revenue arrangements with multiple deliverables under Emerging Issues Task Force Issue (‘‘EITF’’) No. 00-21 are deemed to be immaterial.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments. SFAS No. 107, ‘‘Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments’’ requires that the Company disclose estimated fair values of financial instruments. The carrying amounts reported in the statement of financial position for current assets and current liabilities qualifying as financial instruments are reasonable estimates of fair value. The fair value of long-term debt is estimated to approximate fair market value based on the current rates offered to the Company for debt of the same remaining maturities. The fair value of the Company’s notes payable to stockholders are not reasonably determinable based on the related party nature of the transactions.

Stock-Based Compensation. Effective January 1, 2006, the Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (‘‘SFAS’’) No. 123 (revised 2004), ‘‘Share-Based Payment,’’ (‘‘SFAS 123R’’), which is a revision of SFAS No. 123, ‘‘Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation’’ (‘‘SFAS No. 123’’). SFAS No. 123R supersedes APB No. 25, ‘‘Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees’’, and amends SFAS No. 95, ‘‘Statement of Cash Flows.’’ SFAS No. 123R requires all share-based payments to employees, including grants of employee stock options, to be recognized in the financial statements based upon their fair values. As a result, the intrinsic value method of accounting for stock options with pro forma footnote disclosure, as allowed for under SFAS No. 123, is no longer permitted.

The Company adopted SFAS No. 123R using the modified prospective method, which requires the Company to record compensation expense for all awards granted after the date of adoption, and for the unvested portion of previously granted awards that remain outstanding at the date of adoption.

F-8

Table of Contents

Accordingly, prior period amounts have not been restated to reflect the adoption of SFAS No. 123R. After assessing alternative valuation models and amortization assumptions, the Company chose to continue using the Black-Scholes valuation model and recognition of compensation expense over the requisite service period of the grant.

As a result, the Company’s net loss for the year ended December 31, 2006 is $100,625 higher than if it had continued to account for share-based compensation under Accounting Principles Board (‘‘APB’’) opinion No. 25. The Company recorded total stock-based compensation of $100,625 during this period for options granted and vested which is included in selling, general and administrative expense. As of December 31, 2006 the fair value of the unvested stock options amounted to $120,000 which are expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of approximately 2.1 years.

The Company uses the Black-Scholes option pricing model to determine the weighted average fair value of options. The weighted average fair value of options granted during the year ended December 31, 2006 and 2005 was $0.81 and $0.66, respectively. The assumptions utilized to determine the fair value of options at the date of grant are indicated in the following table.


	Year ended December 31, 2006	Year ended December 31, 2005
Risk-free interest rate	4.6% – 5.1%	3.6% – 4.4%
Expected volatility	41% – 60%	56%
Expected life (in years)	6 – 10	6 – 10
Expected dividend yield	—	—

Prior to January 1, 2006, the Company’s stock-based employee compensation plans were accounted for under the recognition and measurement provisions of Accounting Principles Board Opinion (‘‘APB’’) No. 25, ‘‘Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees’’ (‘‘APB 25’’), and related Interpretations, as permitted by Financial Accounting Standards Board (‘‘FASB’’) Statement No. 123, ‘‘Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation,’’ (‘‘SFAS 123’’).

For the year ended December 31, 2005, as was permitted under SFAS No. 148, ‘‘Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation — Transition and Disclosure,’’ which amended SFAS No. 123, ‘‘Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation,’’ the Company elected to continue to follow the intrinsic value method in accounting for its stock-based employee compensation arrangements as defined by APB No. 25, ‘‘Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees,’’ and related interpretations including FASB Interpretation No. 44, ‘‘Accounting for Certain Transactions Involving Stock Compensation, an interpretation of APB No. 25.’’ Under the intrinsic value method, no stock-based compensation expenses had been recognized as the exercise price of the grants equaled the fair market value of the underlying stock at the date of grant. The following table illustrates the effect on net loss per share as if the Company had applied the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS No. 123 to stock-based employee compensation for the year ended December 31, 2005:


Net loss as reported	$	(947,205	)
Deduct: Stock-based employee compensation as determined under fair value method for all awards, net of related tax effects		(457,153	)
Pro forma net loss	$	(1,404,358	)
Net loss per share
Basic and diluted loss – as reported	$	(0.07	)
Basic and diluted loss – pro forma	$	(0.10	)

Basic and Diluted Loss Per Share. Net loss per share is computed in accordance with Statement of Financial Standards No. 128, ‘‘Earning Per Share’’ (‘‘SFAS No. 128’’). SFAS No. 128 requires the presentation of both basic and diluted earnings per share.

Basic net loss per common share is computed using the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted loss per share reflects the potential dilution that could

F-9

Table of Contents

occur through the potential effect of common shares issuable upon the exercise of stock options, warrants and convertible securities. The calculation assumes (i) the exercise of stock options and warrants based on the treasury stock method; and (ii) the conversion of convertible preferred stock only if an entity records earnings from continuing operations, as such adjustments would otherwise be anti-dilutive to earnings per share from continuing operations. As a result of the Company having recorded a loss during each of the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005, the average number of common shares used in the calculation of basic and diluted loss per share is identical and has not been adjusted for the effects of the following items: (i) 2,651,019 and 2,681,853 potential common shares from unexercised stock options and warrants for each of the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively, and (ii) 687,280 and 938,431 shares convertible under stockholders’ notes at December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. Such potential common shares may dilute earnings per share in the future.

Convertible Notes Payable. The Company accounts for conversion options embedded in convertible notes in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (‘‘SFAS) No. 133 ‘‘Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities’’ (‘‘SFAS 133’’) and EITF 00-19 ‘‘Accounting for Derivative Financial Instruments Indexed to, and Potentially Settled in, a Company’s Own Stock’’ (‘‘EITF 00-19’’). SFAS 133 generally requires Companies to bifurcate conversion options embedded in convertible notes and preferred shares from their host instruments and to account for them as free standing derivative financial instruments in accordance with EITF 00-19. SFAS 133 provides for an exception to this rule when convertible notes are deemed to be conventional as that term is described in the implementation guidance provided in paragraph 61 (k) of Appendix A to SFAS 133 and further clarified in EITF 05-2 ‘‘The Meaning of ‘‘Conventional Convertible Debt Instrument’’ in Issue No. 00-19. SFAS 133 provides for an additional exception to this rule when the economic characteristics and risks of the embedded derivative instrument are clearly and closely related to the economic characteristics and risks of the host instrument.

The Company accounts for convertible notes (deemed conventional) and non-conventional convertible debt instruments classified as equity under EITF 00-19 ‘‘Accounting for Derivative Financial Investments Indexed to, and Potentially Settled in, a Company’s Own Stock’’ (‘‘EITF 00-19’’) and in accordance with the provisions of Emerging Issues Task Force Issue (‘‘EITF’’) 98-5 ‘‘Accounting for Convertible Securities with Beneficial Conversion Features or Contingently Adjustable Conversion Ratios’’ (‘‘EITF 98-5’’), EITF 00-27 ‘‘Application of EITF 98-5 to Certain Convertible Instruments.’’ Accordingly, the Company records, as a discount to convertible notes, the intrinsic value of such conversion options based upon the differences between the fair value of the underlying common stock at the commitment date of the note transaction and the effective conversion price embedded in the note. Debt discounts under these arrangements are amortized over the term of the related debt to their earliest date of redemption.

Note 3. Cash

The Company maintains its cash in bank deposit accounts, which at times, may exceed federally insured limits. The Company has not experienced any losses in such accounts. The Company believes it is not exposed to any significant credit risk on cash. The amount on deposit at December 31, 2006 exceeded the insurance limits by approximately $47,000.

F-10

Table of Contents

Note 4. Property and Equipment, net

As of December 31, 2006, the Company’s property and equipment, net is comprised of:


Network and base station equipment	$	4,149,865
Customer premise equipment		3,090,253
Furniture, fixtures and equipment		185,151
Computer equipment		181,725
System Software		135,208
		7,742,202
Less: accumulated depreciation		3,983,617
	$	3,758,585

Depreciation expense for the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005 was $1,206,250 and $933,557.

Property held under capital leases as of December 31, 2006 consists of the following:

Note 5. Asset Acquisitions

On August 26, 2006 the Company entered into a License Purchase Agreement for certain spectrum in southern Florida. The purchase price was comprised of a cash payment of $50,000 and the balance of $200,000 payable in four equal annual installments of $50,000 without interest plus 70,077 shares of Towerstream common stock valued at $1.43 per share. The Agreement requires acceleration of all future payments due 90 days after the Company receives additional financing in excess of $3,000,000. This condition was met on January 12, 2007. The Agreement is also contingent upon and may be unwound by the parties if certain events or conditions are not met prior to November 21, 2007.

On November 30, 2006 the Company completed an Asset Purchase Agreement to purchase a fixed wireless network in Seattle, WA for $200,000. The purchase included fixed wireless equipment and related assets at five points of presence, as well as, the assumption of certain operating leases at those locations. No customer contracts were purchased or assumed in the transaction.

F-11

Table of Contents

Note 6. Notes Payable, Stockholders

As of December 31, 2006, Notes payable to stockholders consist of:


Unsecured 5% promissory note dated August 1, 2005 with monthly installments of principal and interest of $10,806. The note matures on August 1, 2008. The note contains an option for the stockholder to convert 50% of the outstanding principal balance into shares of common stock of the Company at the rate of $1.43 per share, the fair market value on the date of the loan.	$	197,011
Unsecured 10% promissory note dated December 7, 2005, payable in monthly installments of interest only. The note matures on December 6, 2007. The stockholder has the right to convert the principal and unpaid interest into shares of common stock at the rate of $1.43 per share, the fair market value on the date of the loan.		250,000
Unsecured 10% promissory note dated January 13, 2006, payable in monthly installments of interest only. The note matures sixty days after demand for repayment.		250,000
Unsecured 10% promissory note dated July 12, 2006, payable in monthly installments of interest only. The note matures sixty days after demand for repayment.		50,000
Secured 10% promissory note dated October 1, 2006. The note matures sixty days after demand for repayment. The note is secured by the assets of the Company.		125,000
Unsecured 10% promissory note dated September 7, 2004, payable in monthly installments of interest only. The note matures September 7, 2007. The note contains an option for the stockholder to convert to shares of common stock at $1.14 per common share, the fair market value on the date of the loan.		150,000
Unsecured 10% promissory note dated November 10, 2005, payable in monthly installments of interest only. The note matures on November 9, 2007. The stockholder has the right to convert the principal and interest into shares of common stock at the rate of $1.43 per share, the fair market value on the date of the loan.		250,000
Secured 10% promissory note dated October 1, 2006. The note matures sixty days after demand for repayment. The note is secured by the assets of the Company.		150,000
Unsecured 10% promissory note dated August 2, 2002, payable in monthly installments of interest only. The note matures sixty days after demand for repayment.		250,000
On August 26, 2006 the Company entered into a License Purchase Agreement for certain spectrum in southern Florida (see Note 5). The balance of the payments are due on April 12, 2007.		200,000
		1,872,011
Less: current maturities of notes payable, stockholders		1,797,611
Note payable stockholder, net of current maturities	$	74,400

F-12

Table of Contents

Note 7. Short-Term Debt

As of December 31, 2006, short-term debt consists of:

Concurrent with the Merger, the above 6% unsecured promissory note of $250,000 was converted into 156,250 shares of common stock.

On January 12, 2006, the Company settled the principal balance of approximately $358,000 of certain equipment financing notes by paying approximately $244,000, prior to their maturity dates. The extinguishment of debt resulted in approximately $114,000 of gain on forgiveness of debt.

On March 30, 2006, two equipment finance notes in the principal amounts of $90,737 and $100,000 and related accrued interest of $42,916 were converted into 186,873 shares of common stock of the Company at the option of the debtor.

Note 8. Capital Lease Obligations

The Company is the lessee of network base station equipments under various capital leases expiring in 2009. The assets and liabilities under those capital leases are recorded at fair market value. The assets are depreciated over the lease term, which approximates their useful lives, using the straight-line method. Depreciation expense of assets under capital leases in 2006 and 2005 was approximately $25,000 and $15,000 respectively.

As of December 31, 2006, the minimum future lease payments under these capital leases are:


Year Ending December 31,
2007	$	81,280
2008		54,968
2009		26,671
Total minimum lease payments		162,919
Less: amount representing imputed interest		(26,919	)
Present Value of Minimum Capital Lease Payments		136,000
Less: current maturities of capital lease obligations		62,685
Capital lease, net of current maturities	$	73,315

Note 9. Employee Benefit Plan

Effective January 1, 2005, the Company established a new 401(k) retirement plan. The plan covers all eligible employees who have attained the age of twenty-one and have completed a half year of service with the Company. The Company could elect to match up to a certain amount of employees’ contributions to the 401(k) plan. Total employee and employer contributions are limited to 100% of compensation per participant or $42,000, whichever is less. For the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005, there were no employer contributions were made toward the 401(k) plan.

Note 10. Stock Option Plan

The Company adopted a stock option plan during the year ended December 31, 2000 (the ‘‘2000 Plan’’). Under the 2000 Plan, the Company can issue up to 1.5 million stock options. On

F-13

Table of Contents

February 10, 2005, the Board of Directors approved the increase in the number of stock options that can be granted under the 2000 Plan from 1.5 million to 3.0 million. The 2000 Plan is intended to provide incentives: (i) to officers and other employees of the Company by providing them with opportunities to purchase common stock in the Company pursuant to options granted, which qualify as incentive stock options; (ii) to directors, officers and employees of, and consultants and advisors of the Company, by providing them with opportunities to purchase common stock in the Company pursuant to options granted which do not qualify as incentive stock options (‘‘nonqualified options’’); and (iii) to directors, officers and employees of, and consultants and advisors to the Company, by providing them with awards of common stock in the Company (‘‘stock awards’’).

The purchase price per share of common stock deliverable upon the exercise of an option shall be determined by the Board of Directors; however, pursuant to the 2000 Plan it shall not be below fair market value on the date of issuance. Each option and all rights shall expire on such date as shall be set forth in the applicable Stock Rights Agreement, except that, in the case of an incentive stock option, such date shall not be later than ten (10) years after the date on which the option is granted and, in all cases, options shall be subject to earlier termination as provided in the 2000 Plan.

Options granted under the 2000 Plan shall be exercisable either in full or in installments, and shares issued pursuant to stock awards granted under the 2000 Plan shall vest either in full or in installments, at such time or times during such period as shall be set forth in the Stock Rights Agreement evidencing such stock rights, subject to the provisions of the 2000 Plan, provided that no option granted shall be exercisable during the first twelve (12) months after the date of grant. In addition, the 2000 Plan limits the right of the holder of outstanding options to exercise such vested options within a limited timetable as defined under the 2000 Plan upon a Participant’s death, becoming disabled or terminating employment.

Transactions under the stock option plan during the year ended December 31, 2006 and 2005 are summarized as follows:


	Number of Options			Weighted Average Exercise Price
Outstanding at January 1, 2005		923,617			$	1.31
Granted during the year 2005		609,671				1.43
Forfeited/expired		(50,455	)			1.58
Outstanding at December 31, 2005		1,482,833			$	1.30
Granted during the year 2006		279,958				1.43
Forfeited/expired		(258,234	)			1.60
Outstanding at December 31, 2006		1,504,557			$	1.31

The following table summarizes information concerning currently outstanding and exercisable stock options:


Outstanding Options											Options Exercisable
Range of Exercise Prices	Number Outstanding at December 31, 2006		Weighted- Average Remaining Contractual Life (years)		Weighted- Average Exercise Price			Intrinsic Value			Number Exercisable at December 31, 2006		Weighted- Average Exercise Price			Intrinsic Value
$0.78		280,309		6.16		$	0.78		$	344,000		280,309		$	0.78		$	344,000
$1.43		1,224,248		7.54		$	1.43			716,270		968,817		$	1.43			566,825
		1,504,557		7.28		$	1.31		$	1,060,270		1,249,126		$	1.25		$	910,825

The intrinsic value is calculated as the difference between the estimated market value of the Company’s common stock at December 31, 2006 which the Company determined to be $2.01 per share and the exercise price of the options.

F-14

Table of Contents


	December 31, 2006			December 31, 2005
Options exercisable – End of year			1,249,126			1,080,356
Weighted average fair value of the options granted during the years		$	0.81		$	0.66
Weighted average remaining contractual life of the outstanding options – End of year	7.28 years			8.05 years

The options granted to employees in 2006 and 2005 were at exercisable prices ranging from $1.14 and $1.43 per common share expiring at various periods through December 2016.

On March 15, 2006 the Board of Directors canceled 140,855 options granted to employees in fiscal 2001 and 2003 at exercise prices of $2.14 per common share and reissued these same options to the same employees at exercise prices of $1.43, the fair market value at the time of the re-issuance. Accordingly, the Company expensed $15,770 of stock based compensation during the year 2006 to reflect the beneficial transfer.

Note 11. Stock Warrants

The Company has issued warrants to purchase shares of common stock to employees and certain non-employees at exercisable prices ranging from $0.71 to $2.14 per common share expiring at various periods through March 2010. Warrants granted to non-employees were in connection with certain loan borrowings. Warrants are only exercisable after the Company becomes a C corporation for tax reporting purposes (see Note 15).

A summary of the status of the warrants for the years ended December 31, is as follows:


	2006			2005
Warrants outstanding – Beginning of year		1,199,020				1,195,516
Granted		—				3,504
Expired		(52,558	)			—
Warrants outstanding – End of year		1,146,462				1,199,020
Warrants exercisable – End of year		—				—
Weighted average fair value of the warrants granted during the years		NA			$	0.70
Weighted average remaining contractual life of the outstanding warrants – End of year	2.20 years			3.09 years

Note 12. Deferred Compensation

On January 1, 2005, the Company entered into a deferred compensation agreement with an officer, who is also a stockholder. The officer agreed to defer $125,000 of his salary for 2005. The agreement allows for the accrual of interest at 10% compounded monthly which totaled approximately $6,700 at December 31, 2005. The amount deferred is due and payable upon either 1) the change of control of the Company’s voting stock or sale of substantially all the assets of the Company; 2) December 31, 2006; or 3) an earlier date if so elected by the Board of Directors. The officer has the right to convert the deferred compensation costs into shares of common stock at $1.43 per share.

On January 1, 2006, the Company entered into a deferred compensation agreement with the same officer above. The officer agreed to defer $45,000 of his salary for 2006. The agreement allows for the accrual of interest at 10% compounded monthly. The amount deferred is due and payable upon either 1) the change of control of the Company’s voting stock or sale of substantially all the assets of the Company; 2) December 31, 2006; or 3) an earlier date if so elected by the Board of Directors. The officer has the right to convert the deferred compensation costs into shares of common stock at $1.43 per share. As of December 31, 2006, the Company has accrued interest of approximately $25,000 on the deferred compensation.

F-15

Table of Contents

On January 4, 2007 the above deferred compensation, accrued interest and conversion rights along with the notes payable were sold to a third party investor and subsequently converted into common stock (see Note 15(a)).

On September 30, 2006, the company awarded a bonus of $40,000 to another officer of the Company, who is also a stockholder of which $10,000 was deferred as of December 31, 2006 and subsequently paid in cash on January 31, 2007.

Note 13. Recent Accounting Pronouncements

The following pronouncements have been issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (‘‘FASB’’):

On February 15, 2007, FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (‘‘SFAS’’) No. 159, entitled ‘‘The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities’’. The guidance in SFAS No. 159 allows reporting entities to choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value. The objective underlying the development of this literature is to improve financial reporting by providing reporting entities with the opportunity to reduce volatility in reported earnings that results from measuring related assets and liabilities differently without having to apply complex hedge accounting provisions, using the guidance in SFAS No. 133 [as amended], entitled ‘‘Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities’’. The provisions of SFAS No. 159 are applicable to all reporting entities and is effective as of the beginning of the first fiscal year that begins subsequent to November 15, 2007. The Company does not believe this new accounting standard will have a material impact on its financial condition or results of operations.

In December 2006, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position (‘‘FSP’’) EITF 00-19-2 ‘‘Accounting for Registration Payment Arrangements’’ (‘‘FSP EITF 00-19-2’’) which specifies that the contingent obligation to make future payments or otherwise transfer consideration under a registration payment arrangement should be separately recognized and measured in accordance with SFAS No. 5, ‘‘Accounting for Contingencies.’’ Adoption of FSP EITF 00-19-02 is required for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006. The Company is currently evaluating the expected effect of FSP EITF 00-19-02 on its consolidated financial statements and is currently not yet in a position to determine such effects.

In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements. This statement provides a single definition of fair value, a framework for measuring fair value, and expanded disclosures concerning fair value. Previously, different definitions of fair value were contained in various accounting pronouncements creating inconsistencies in measurement and disclosures. SFAS No. 157 applies under those previously issued pronouncements that prescribe fair value as the relevant measure of value, except SFAS No. 123(R) and related interpretations and pronouncements that require or permit measurement similar to fair value but are not intended to measure fair value. This pronouncement is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. The Company is evaluating the impact of this new standard, but currently believes that adoption will not have a material impact on its financial position or results of operations.

In September 2006, the Securities and Exchange Commission (‘‘SEC’’)’s Office of the Chief Accountant and Divisions of Corporation Finance and Investment Management released Staff Accounting Bulletin (‘‘SAB’’) No. 108, Considering the Effects of Prior Year Misstatements when Quantifying Misstatements in Current Year Financial Statements (‘‘SAB No. 108’’), that provides interpretive guidance on how the effects of the carryover or reversal of prior year misstatements should be considered in quantifying a current year misstatement. The SEC staff believes that registrants should quantify errors using both a balance sheet and an income statement approach and evaluate whether either approach results in quantifying a misstatement that, when all relevant quantitative and qualitative factors are considered, is material. This pronouncement is effective for fiscal years ending after November 15, 2006. The Company has adopted SAB No. 108 and has found there to be no material impact on its financial position or results of operations.

In July 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Interpretation No. 48, ‘‘Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes – an Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109’’ (the

F-16

Table of Contents

‘‘Interpretation’’). The Interpretation establishes for all entities a minimum threshold for financial statement recognition of the benefit of tax positions, and requires certain expanded disclosures. The Interpretation is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 31, 2006, and is to be applied to all open tax years as of the date of effectiveness. The Company is in the process of evaluating the impact of the application of the Interpretation to its consolidated financial statements.

In February 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 155 ‘‘Accounting for Certain Hybrid Financial Instruments’’, an amendment of FASB Statements No. 133 and 140’’ (‘‘SFAS 155’’). SFAS 155 clarifies certain issues relating to embedded derivatives and beneficial interests in securitized financial assets. The provisions of SFAS 155 are effective for all financial instruments acquired or issued after fiscal years beginning after September 15, 2006. The Company does not expect this pronouncement to have a material impact on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

In September 2005, the FASB ratified the following consensus reached in Emerging Issues Task Force (‘‘EITF’’) Issue 05-8: a) The issuance of convertible debt with a beneficial conversion feature results in a basis difference in applying FASB Statement of Financial Accounting Standards SFAS No. 109. Recognition of such a feature effectively creates a debt instrument and a separate equity instrument for book purposes, whereas the convertible debt is treated entirely as a debt instrument for income tax purposes. b) The resulting basis difference should be deemed a temporary difference because it will result in a taxable amount when the recorded amount of the liability is recovered or settled. c) Recognition of deferred taxes for the temporary difference should be reported as an adjustment to additional paid-in capital. This consensus is effective in the first interim or annual reporting period commencing after December 15, 2005, with early application permitted. The effect of applying the consensus should be accounted for retroactively to all debt instruments containing a beneficial conversion feature that are subject to EITF Issue 00-27 (and thus is applicable to debt instruments converted or extinguished in prior periods but which are still presented in the financial statements). The adoption of this pronouncement did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements.

In June 2005, the EITF reached consensus on Issue No. 05-6 (‘‘EITF 05-6’’). EITF 05-6 provides guidance on determining the amortization period for leasehold improvements acquired in a business combination or acquired subsequent to lease inception. The guidance in EITF 05-6 will be applied prospectively and is effective for periods beginning after June 29, 2005. The adoption of EITF 05-6 did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

In June 2005, the FASB ratified EITF Issue No. 05-2, ‘‘The Meaning of "Conventional Convertible Debt Instrument’’ in EITF No. 00-19, ‘‘Accounting for Derivative Financial Instruments Indexed to, and Potentially Settled in, a Company’s Own Stock’’ (‘‘EITF No. 05-2’’), which addresses when a convertible debt instrument should be considered conventional for the purpose of applying the guidance in EITF No. 00-19. EITF No. 05-2 also retained the exemption under EITF No. 00-19 for conventional convertible debt instruments and indicated that convertible preferred stock having a mandatory redemption date may qualify for the exemption provided under EITF No. 00-19 for conventional convertible debt if the instrument’s economic characteristics are more similar to debt than equity. EITF No. 05-2 is effective for new instruments entered into and instruments modified in periods beginning after June 29, 2005. The adoption of this pronouncement did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

In May 2005, the FASB issued SFAS No. 154, ‘‘Accounting Changes and Error Correction.’’ This Statement replaces APB Opinion No. 20, Accounting Changes, and FASB Statement No. 3, Reporting Accounting Changes in Interim Financial Statements, and changes the requirements for the accounting for and reporting of a change in accounting principle. The statements apply to all voluntary changes in accounting principle. It also applies to changes required by an accounting pronouncement in the unusual instance that the pronouncement does not include specific transition provisions. When a pronouncement includes specific transition provisions, those provisions should be followed. This statement is effective for accounting changes and corrections of errors made in the fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2005. The adoption of this pronouncement did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.

F-17

Table of Contents

Note 14. Commitments and Contingencies

Lease Obligations. The Company leases roof top rights, cellular towers and office space under various non-cancelable agreements expiring through December 2019. As of December 31, 2006, the total future lease payments are as follows:


Year Ending December 31,
2007	$	928,781
2008		747,128
2009		637,798
2010		575,859
2011		274,452
Thereafter		1,094,713
	$	4,258,731

Rent expense for the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005 totaled approximately $857,000 and $863,000, respectively.

Note 15. Subsequent Events


	(a)	On January 4, 2007, certain stockholders collectively transferred an aggregate of $1,616,753 in outstanding promissory notes and other payables due from Towerstream to a group of third party investors. In connection with these note transfers, Towerstream issued a new promissory note of approximately $1.7 million and cancelled the aforementioned obligations. As part of the arrangement, Towerstream agreed that it will take all actions to allow the investors to have the right to automatically convert the note into shares of common stock of UGC at a conversion price of $1.50 per share. In conjunction with the above transaction, the Towerstream Corporation, formerly UGC, a publicly traded shell company will record a charge of approximately $314,000 for the beneficial conversion feature granted to the holders of approximately $924,000 of the stockholders’ notes at $1.50 per share which did not originally have conversion rights and were converted to equity upon the Merger. In addition, a stockholder with a $250,000 convertible note exercised his right to convert the note into shares of common stock at $1.43 per share in conjunction with the Merger.


	(b)	On January 12, 2007, Towerstream Acquisition, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of UGC merged with Towerstream Corporation, a private corporation. Upon closing of the merger, Towerstream Corporation became a wholly-owned subsidiary of UGC, and UGC succeeded to Towerstream Corporation’s line of business as its sole line of business. In connection with the merger, Towerstream Corporation changed its name to Towerstream I, Inc., and UGC changed its name to Towerstream Corporation.


	(c)	On January 12, 2007, Towerstream merged with a newly formed subsidiary of UGC. In connection with the merger, UGC issued 15,000,000 shares of its common stock for all the outstanding common stock of Towerstream. As a result of the transaction, the former owners of Towerstream became the controlling stockholders of UGC and UGC changed its name to Towerstream Corporation. Pursuant to the terms of the merger agreement, 1,900,000 shares of the previously issued and outstanding shares of UGC remain outstanding and all other shares outstanding prior to the merger were cancelled.

Accordingly, the merger of Towerstream and UGC (the ‘‘Merger’’) is deemed to be a reverse merger that has been accounted for as a recapitalization of Towerstream.


	(d)	Concurrent with the Merger, UGC sold 5,110,056 shares of common stock for gross proceeds of $11,497,625 (at $2.25 per share). In addition, these investors received warrants to purchase 2,555,028 shares of common stock for a period of five years at an exercise price of $4.50 per share, collectively (the ‘‘Private Placement’’). In connection with the Private Placement, UGC incurred placement agent fees totaling approximately $446,400, and issued 140,917 warrants

F-18

Table of Contents


		with an estimated fair value of approximately $77,000 to the placement agent at an exercise price of $4.50 per share for a period of five years. In addition, UGC incurred other professional fees and expenses totaling approximately $522,300 in connection with the Merger. In connection with the sale of units of common stock and warrants, UGC agreed to file a registration statement underlying the resale of the common stock issued and underlying warrants no later than March 19, 2007, and to cause such statement to be effective on or before May 28, 2007. If such statement is either not filed or declared effective by the above dates, it must pay liquidated damages of 1% of the unit purchase price per month of delinquency with a maximum amount of damages of 6% of the unit purchase price.


	(e)	In conjunction with the Merger, UGC sold $3,500,000 of senior convertible debentures (the ‘‘Debentures’’). The Debentures require quarterly interest only payments of 8% per annum, mature on December 31, 2009 and contain certain restrictive debt covenants as defined in the agreement. The Debentures are convertible into shares of common stock of UGC at $2.75 per share. In addition, holders of the Debentures received warrants to purchase 636,364 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $4.00 per share and warrants to purchase 636,364 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $6.00 per share, for a period of five years. The issuance of the warrants resulted in the recording of a debt discount of approximately $527,000. In connection with the sale of the debentures, UGC agreed to file a registration statement underlying the resale of the common stock issued upon conversion of the debentures and underlying warrants no later than March 29, 2007, and to cause such statement to be effective on or before May 28, 2007. If such statement is either not filed or declared effective by the above dates, it must pay liquidated damages of 1% of the debenture purchase price per month of delinquency with a maximum mount of damages of 6% of the debenture purchase price.

In connection with the Debentures, UGC incurred placement agent fees totaling approximately $140,000, and issued 63,634 warrants with an estimated fair value of $34,750 to the placement agent at an exercise price of $4.50 per share for a period of five years.


	(f)	In conjunction with the merger, on January 12, 2007 Towerstream Corporation, formerly UGC, reserved a total of 3,200,000 shares for the issuance of options and warrants. The total options and warrants exchanged in the merger totaled 2,651,027. Also, in conjunction with the merger Towerstream adopted the 2007 Equity Compensation Plan (the ‘‘2007 Plan’’). The Plan provides a means for awarding specific equity-based benefits to officers and other employees, consultants and directors to encourage them to exercise their best efforts to enhance its growth. Under the Merger agreement all options and certain warrants and their respective rights and obligations, that were outstanding prior to the merger were transferred into the 2007 Plan and totaled 1,854,950. The total number of shares of Common Stock that can be delivered under the 2007 Plan is 2,403,923.


	(g)	On January 12, 2007 the Board of Directors issued 50,000 non-qualified stock options to directors and 100,000 non-qualified stock options to a consultant. In addition, 3,504 incentive stock options were issued to an employee. All options were issued under the 2007 Plan at an exercise price of $2.25, the estimated market price of the common stock on the date of issuance.


	(h)	In conjunction with the merger, on January 12, 2007, Towerstream Corporation’s income tax status as an S corporation terminated and subsequently will be classified as a C corporation for income tax reporting purposes.


	(i)	On January 12, 2007 and concurrent with the Merger the $250,000 6% promissory note dated November 2, 2006 was converted into 156,250 shares of common stock. Towerstream Corporation will record a charge of approximately $64,000 for the beneficial conversion feature granted to the note holder.

F-19

Table of Contents


	(j)	On January 18, 2007, Towerstream entered into a one year consulting agreement with a company to provide services related to investor relations. The agreement calls for monthly payments of $7,500 plus expenses and a non-refundable issuance of 200,000 shares of Towerstream common stock.


	(k)	On February 8, 2007, a stockholder exercised his warrant to purchase 56,062 shares of common stock of the Company for $119,973.


	(l)	On February 14, 2007, the Board of Directors issued 75,000 incentive stock options to a member of management under the 2007 Equity Compensation Plan at an exercise price of $9.74, which was 110% of the estimated market price of the common stock on the date of the issuance. The options vest quarterly over two years.


	(m)	On March 12, 2007 the Company entered into two, five year, antenna site license operating lease agreements which require monthly payments of $2,800 and $714 respectively.

F-20

Table of Contents

TOWERSTREAM CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY

INTRODUCTION TO PRO FORMA CONDENSED
COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)

The following unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial statements give effect to the merger transaction between Towerstream Corporation (‘‘Towerstream’’) and University Girls Calendar, Ltd. (‘‘UGC’’).

On January 12, 2007, Towerstream merged with a newly formed subsidiary of UGC, a publicly traded shell company. In connection with the merger 1,900,000 of UGC common shares will remain outstanding and all other shares of UGC outstanding were cancelled. Also, in connection with the merger, UGC issued 15,000,000 shares of its common stock for all the outstanding common stock of Towerstream. As a result of the transaction, the former owners of Towerstream became the controlling stockholders of UGC and UGC changed its name to Towerstream Corporation. Accordingly, the merger of Towerstream and UGC (the ‘‘Merger’’) is a reverse merger that has been accounted for as a recapitalization of Towerstream.

Concurrent with the merger, certain stockholders collectively transferred an aggregate of $1,616,753 in outstanding promissory notes and other payables due from Towerstream to a group of third party investors. In connection with these note transfers, Towerstream issued a new promissory note of approximately $1.7 million and cancelled the aforementioned obligations. As part of the arrangement, Towerstream agreed that it will take all actions to allow the investors to have the right to automatically convert the note into shares of common stock of UGC at a conversion price of $1.50 per share upon effectiveness of the Merger. In addition, a stockholder with a $250,000 convertible note exercised his right to convert the note into shares of common stock at $1.43 per share in conjunction with the Merger and a debt holder with a $250,000 convertible note exercised his right to convert the note into shares of common stock at $1.60 per share in conjunction with the Merger.

Concurrent with the Merger, UGC sold 5,110,056 shares of common stock for gross proceeds of $11,497,625 (at $2.25 per share) through a Private Placement. In addition, these investors received warrants to purchase 2,555,028 shares of common stock for a period of five years at an exercise price of $4.50 per share. The holders of the common stock have certain registration rights as defined in the agreements.

In connection with the Private Placement, UGC incurred placement agent fees totaling approximately $446,400, and issued 140,917 warrants to the placement agent at an exercise price of $4.50 per share for a period of five years. In addition, UGC incurred other professional fees and expenses post December 31, 2006 totaling approximately $160,000 in connection with the Merger transaction.

In conjunction with the Merger, UGC sold $3,500,000 of senior convertible debentures (the ‘‘Debentures’’). The Debentures require quarterly interest only payments of 8% per annum and mature on December 31, 2009. The Debentures are convertible into shares of common stock of UGC at $2.75 per share. In addition, holders of the Debentures received warrants to purchase 636,364 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $4.00 per share and warrants to purchase 636,364 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $6.00 per share, for a period of five years. The holders of the Debentures have certain limited conversion and registration rights as defined under the agreement.

In connection with the Debentures, UGC incurred placement agent fees totaling approximately $140,000, and issued 63,636 warrants with an estimated fair value of $34,750 to the placement agent at an exercise price of $4.50 per share for a period of five years.

The following unaudited pro forma condensed combined balance sheet combines the balance sheet of Towerstream with UGC as of December 31, 2006, as if the aforementioned Merger of Towerstream and UGC occurred on that date.

F-21

Table of Contents

The unaudited pro forma condensed combined balance sheet and earnings per share data should be read in conjunction with the separate historical financial statements of Towerstream, appearing elsewhere herein, and the historical financial statements of UGC, as filed and included in form 10-KSB for the year ended November 30, 2006. The fiscal year of Towerstream and UGC is December 31, and November 30, respectively. The unaudited pro forma condensed combined balance sheet is not necessarily indicative of the combined financial position had the acquisition occurred on December 31, 2006. The unaudited pro forma earnings per share data are not necessarily indicative as if the merger occurred at the beginning of the respective periods.

F-22

Table of Contents

TOWERSTREAM CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY
PRO FORMA UNAUDITED CONDENSED COMBINED BALANCE SHEET
December 31, 2006


									Pro Forma Adjustments
	Towerstream Corporation				University Girls Calendar, Ltd.				Towerstream Corporation				University Girls Calendar, Ltd.				Pro Forma Combined
Assets
Current assets	(a)				(b)
Cash and cash equivalents		$	160,363			$	10,059							$	14,411,237	^k		$	14,571,600
															(10,059	)^l
Accounts receivable, net			157,443				806								(806	)^l			157,443
Prepaid expenses			25,202				4,409								(4,409	)^l			25,202
Total current assets			343,008				15,274								14,395,963				14,754,245
Property and equipment, net			3,758,585																3,785,585
FCC license			350,000																350,000
Security deposits and other assets			61,685												140,000	^k			236,435
															34,750	^m
Total assets		$	4,513,278			$	15,274							$	14,570,713			$	19,099,265
Liabilities and Stockholder’s Equity
Current Liabilities
Short-term debt		$	259,341							$	(250,000	)^c						$	9,341
Current maturities of capital lease obligations			62,685																62,685
Current maturities of notes payable, stockholders			1,797,611								(1,597,611	)^e							200,000
Accounts payable and accrued expenses			941,614				17,641				159,611	^g							1,119,218
Deferred compensation			180,000								(170,000	)^e							10,000
Accrued interest on deferred compensation			24,743								(24,743	)^e
Deferred revenues			400,766																400,766
Total current liabilities			3,666,760				17,641				(1,882,391	)
Other liabilities
Notes payable, stockholder, net of current maturities			74,400								(74,400	)^e
Capital lease obligations, net of current maturities			73,315																73,315
Senior convertible notes (net of debt discount of $526,927)															3,500,000	^k			2,973,073
															(526,927	)ⁿ
Total other liabilities			147,715								(74,400	)			2,973,073				3,046,388
Total liabilities			3,814,475				17,641				(1,956,791	)			2,973,073				4,848,398
Commitments
Stockholder’s equity (deficit)
Preferred stock, par value $0.001 (none issued)
Common stock, par value $0.001			15,000				4,450								(2,550	)^o			23,469
											156	^d
											1,303	^f			5,110	^p
Additional paid-in capital			8,896,803				70,558								11,046,127	^k,p			14,227,398
											(156	)^d			2,550	^o
											(1,303	)^f
											250,000	^c			34,750	^m
											1,866,754	^e			526,927	ⁿ
											64,063	^h			(15,274	)^l
											313,992	ⁱ			1,405	^q
											(8,751,018	)^j			(78,780	)^r
Accumulated other comprehensive income			(8,213,000	)			1,405								(1,405	)^q
Accumulated deficit							(78,780	)			(159,963	)^g			78,780	^r
											8,751,018	^j
											(64,063	)^h
											(313,992	)ⁱ
Total stockholders’ equity (deficit)			698,803				(2,367	)			1,956,791				11,597,640				14,250,867
Total liability and stockholders’ equity		$	4,513,278			$	15,274							$	14,570,713			$	19,099,265

See accompanying notes to pro forma condensed combined financial statements.

F-23

Table of Contents

TOWERSTREAM CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO PRO FORMA UNAUDITED CONDENSED COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


Note 1.	Merger Transaction

On January 12, 2007, Towerstream merged into a newly formed subsidiary of UGC, a publicly traded shell company. In connection with the merger 1,900,000 of UGC common shares remain outstanding and all other shares of UGC previously issued and outstanding were cancelled. Also, in connection with the merger, UGC issued 15,000,000 shares of its common stock for all the outstanding common stock of Towerstream. As a result of the transaction, the former owners of Towerstream became the controlling stockholders of UGC and UGC changed its name to Towerstream Corporation. Accordingly, the merger of Towerstream and UGC (the ‘‘Merger’’) is a reverse merger that has been accounted for as a recapitalization of Towerstream.


Note 2.	Pro forma Adjustments

The pro forma adjustments to the unaudited condensed combined balance sheet give effect to the recapitalization of Towerstream as if the transaction had occurred on December 31, 2006.

Balance Sheet – December 31, 2006


	a.	Derived from the audited balance sheet of Towerstream as of December 31, 2006.


	b.	Derived from the audited balance sheet of UGC as of November 30, 2006.


	c.	To record as of December 31, 2006, the conversion of $250,000 of short-term debt for the issuance of 156,250 common shares.


	d.	To record par value for issuance of 156,250 shares of common stock related to conversion of short-term debt into shares of common stock (see c above).


	e.	To record as of December 31, 2006, the conversion of $1,866,754 stockholders’ obligations for the issuance of 1,302,583 common shares. The debt converted is as follows:


	f.	To record par value for issuance of 1,302,583 shares of common stock related to conversion of stockholders’ obligations into shares of common stock (see e above).


	g.	To record professional fees and other expenses of approximately $160,000 related to the Merger and incurred after December 31, 2006.


	h.	To record the beneficial conversion feature granted to the holder of the $250,000 note at $1.60 per share which did not originally have a conversion right and was converted into shares of common stock in connection with the Merger (see c above).


	i.	To record the beneficial conversion feature granted to the holders of $923,505 of stockholders’ obligations at $1.50 per share which did not originally have conversion rights and were converted into shares of common stock in connection with the Merger.


	j.	Reclassification of accumulated deficit due to conversion from ‘‘S’’ corporation to ‘‘C’’ corporation.


	k.	Concurrent with the Merger, UGC sold 5,110,056 shares of common stock for gross proceeds of $11,497,625 (at $2.25 per share) and incurred placement agent fees of $446,388. In addition, these investors received warrants to purchase 2,555,028 shares of common stock for a period of five years at an exercise price of $4.50 per share, collectively the (‘‘Private Placement’’).

F-24

Table of Contents

In connection with the Private Placement, UGC incurred placement agent fees totaling approximately $446,400 and issued 140,917 warrants to the placement agents at an exercise price of $4.50 per share for a period of five years. In addition, UGC incurred other professional fees and expenses totaling approximately $160,000 after December 31, 2006 in connection with the Merger transaction.

In connection with the Debentures, UGC incurred placement agent fees totaling approximately $140,000 and issued 63,636 warrants with an estimated fair value of $34,750 to the placement agent at an exercise price of $4.50 per share for a period of five years. The above equity and debt offerings generated net proceeds of $14,411,237 as computed below:


Gross proceeds received on sale of common stock	$	11,497,625
Less: placement agent fees on sale of Private Placement		446,388
			$	11,051,237
Gross proceeds received from issuance of Debentures	$	3,500,000
Less: placement agent fees on sale of Debentures		140,000
			$	3,360,000
Net Proceeds			$	14,411,237


	l.	To record elimination of UGC operating subsidiary assets transferred to UGC’s former sole officer and director in conjunction with the Merger.


	m.	To record fair value of placement agent warrants associated with issuance of Debentures.


	n.	To record a debt discount associated with warrants issued in connection with the issuance of Debentures.


	o.	To reflect the reduction of 2,550,010 shares of UGC common stock, par value $0.001.


	p.	Issuance of 5,110,056 shares of UGC common stock in connection with Private Placement, par value $0.001.


	q.	Elimination of UGC accumulated other comprehensive income.


	r.	Elimination of UGC accumulated deficit.

There are 23,468,889 shares of common stock issued and outstanding post merger consisting of 15,000,000 shares issued to the former owners of Towerstream, 1,900,000 shares issued to the owners of UGC, 1,302,583 shares issued to convertible note holders, 5,110,056 shares issued in connection with the Private Placement, and 156,250 shares issued to short-term note holder upon conversion of debt to common stock.

F-25

Table of Contents


Note 3.	Basic and diluted earnings per share for the year ended December 31, 2006

The computation of pro forma basic and diluted earnings per share for the year ended December 31, 2006, is calculated as if the Merger occurred at the beginning of the period.


									Pro Forma Adjustments
	Towerstream Corporation				University Girls Calendar, Ltd.				Towerstream Corporation				University Girls Calendar, Ltd.				Pro Forma Combined
Year Ended December 31, 2006	^(a)				^(b)
Revenues		$	6,296,218															$	6,296,218
Operating expenses
Cost of revenues			1,636,820																1,636,820
Depreciation			1,206,250																1,206,250
Customer support services			507,276																507,276
Selling, general and administrative expenses			3,636,376				53,232				159,963	^c			46,667	^g			3,854,589
															11,583	^h
															(53,232	)ⁱ
Total operating expenses			6,986,722				53,232				159,963				5,018				7,204,935
Total operating loss			(690,504	)			(53,232	)			(159,963	)			(5,018	)			(908,717	)
Other expenses/(income)
Interest expense, net			237,071								(148,926	)^d			175,642	^j			921,842
											313,992	^e			280,000	^k
											64,063	^f
Gain on extinguishment of debt			(114,339	)															(114,339	)
Loss from discontinues operations							16,327								(16,327	)^l
Gain on sale of property and equipment			(1,705	)															(1,705	)
Total other expense			121,027				16,327				229,129				439,315				805,798
Net loss		$	(811,531	)		$	(69,559	)		$	(389,092	)		$	(444,333	)		$	(1,714,515	)
Earnings per common and common equivalent share
Basic and diluted:							(0.02	)											(0.07	)
Weighted average shares used in computing earnings per common and common equivalent share
Basic and diluted:							4,450,010								(2,550,010	)^m			23,120,643
															14,910,457	ⁿ
															5,110,056	^o
															1,187,109	^p
															13,021	^q


a.	Derived from the audited statement of operations of Towerstream for the year ended December 31, 2006.


b.	Derived from the audited statement of operations of UGC for the year ended November 30, 2006.


c.	To record professional fees and other expenses of $159,963 related to the Merger.


d.	To eliminate interest expense on stockholders’ obligations which were converted to shares of common stock as part of the Merger for the year ended December 31 2006.


e.	To record additional interest expense related to the beneficial conversion feature granted to the holders of the stockholders’ obligations in consideration for converting such debt to shares of common stock upon the Merger.


f.	To record additional interest expense related to the beneficial conversion feature granted to the holder of the $250,000 note in consideration for converting such debt to shares of common stock upon the Merger.


g.	Amortization of placement agent fees paid in connection with placement of Debentures.


h.	Amortization of fair value of placement agent warrants issued in connection with placement of Debentures.


i.	Elimination of administrative expenses of UGC, the public shell company.

F-26

Table of Contents


j.	Amortization of debt discount associated with warrants issued in connection with the Debentures.


k.	To record interest expense associated with issuance of the Debentures for the year ended December 31, 2006.


l.	Elimination of discontinued operations of UGC, the public shell company.


m.	Reduction of 2,550,010 shares of UGC common stock from 4,450,010 to 1,900,000 shares in connection with the Merger.


n.	14,910,457 shares – weighted average calculation of 15,000,000 shares issued by UGC for 100% of the outstanding stock of Towerstream in connection with the Merger.


o.	Issuance of 5,110,056 shares of UGC in connection with the Private Placement resulting in gross proceeds of $11,497,625.


p.	1,187,109 shares – weighted average calculation of 1,302,583 shares of UGC in settlement of stockholders’ obligations which resulted in the retirement and payment in full of $1,866,754 of debt upon the Merger.


q.	13,021 shares – weighted average calculation of 156,250 shares of UGC upon conversion of short-term debt to common stock upon the Merger.

F-27

Table of Contents

PART II

INFORMATION NOT REQUIRED IN PROSPECTUS


Item 24.	Indemnification of Directors and Officers.

Section 145 of the Delaware General Corporation Law (the ‘‘DGCL’’) provides, in general, that a corporation incorporated under the laws of the State of Delaware, as we are, may indemnify any person who was or is a party or is threatened to be made a party to any threatened, pending or completed action, suit or proceeding (other than a derivative action by or in the right of the corporation) by reason of the fact that such person is or was a director, officer, employee or agent of the corporation, or is or was serving at the request of the corporation as a director, officer, employee or agent of another enterprise, against expenses (including attorneys’ fees), judgments, fines and amounts paid in settlement actually and reasonably incurred by such person in connection with such action, suit or proceeding if such person acted in good faith and in a manner such person reasonably believed to be in or not opposed to the best interests of the corporation and, with respect to any criminal action or proceeding, had no reasonable cause to believe such person’s conduct was unlawful. In the case of a derivative action, a Delaware corporation may indemnify any such person against expenses (including attorneys’ fees) actually and reasonably incurred by such person in connection with the defense or settlement of such action or suit if such person acted in good faith and in a manner such person reasonably believed to be in or not opposed to the best interests of the corporation, except that no indemnification will be made in respect of any claim, issue or matter as to which such person will have been adjudged to be liable to the corporation unless and only to the extent that the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware or any other court in which such action was brought determines such person is fairly and reasonably entitled to indemnity for such expenses.

Our Certificate of Incorporation and By-laws provide that we will indemnify our directors, officers, employees and agents to the extent and in the manner permitted by the provisions of the DGCL, as amended from time to time, subject to any permissible expansion or limitation of such indemnification, as may be set forth in any stockholders’ or directors’ resolution or by contract. In addition, our director and officer indemnification agreements with each of our directors and officers provide, among other things, for the indemnification to the fullest extent permitted or required by Delaware law, provided that no indemnitee will be entitled to indemnification in connection with any claim initiated by the indemnitee against us or our directors or officers unless we join or consent to the initiation of the claim, or the purchase and sale of securities by the indemnitee in violation of Section 16(b) of the Exchange Act.

Any repeal or modification of these provisions approved by our stockholders will be prospective only and will not adversely affect any limitation on the liability of any of our directors or officers existing as of the time of such repeal or modification.

We are also permitted to apply for insurance on behalf of any director, officer, employee or other agent for liability arising out of his actions, whether or not the DGCL would permit indemnification.


Item 25.	Other Expenses of Issuance and Distribution.

We are paying all of the selling stockholders’ expenses related to this offering, except that the selling stockholders will pay any applicable underwriting discounts and commissions. The fees and expenses payable by us in connection with this Registration Statement are estimated as follows:


SEC Registration Fee	$	2,486.95
Accounting Fees and Expenses		25,000.00
Legal Fees and Expenses		75,000.00
Miscellaneous Fees and Expenses		2,513.05
Total	$	105,000.00

II-1

Table of Contents


Item 26.	Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities.

On January 12, 2007, we accepted subscriptions for $10,272,625 or 91.3 units, with each unit consisting of 50,000 shares of common stock and a five-year warrant to purchase 25,000 shares of common stock at an initial exercise price of $4.50 per share. Each unit was sold for $112,500 and we accepted subscriptions for partial units. In total, on January 12, 2007, we issued 4,565,111 shares of common stock and warrants to purchase up to 2,282,556 shares of common stock. The securities were offered and sold to investors in reliance upon exemptions from registration pursuant to Section 4(2) under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Rule 506 promulgated thereunder. Each of the persons and/or entities receiving our securities qualified as an accredited investor (as defined by Rule 501 under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended).

On January 18, 2007, we accepted additional subscriptions for $1,225,000 or 10.9 units, resulting in our issuance of 544,945 shares of common stock and warrants to purchase up to 272,472 shares of common stock. The securities were offered and sold to investors in reliance upon exemptions from registration pursuant to Section 4(2) under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Rule 506 promulgated thereunder. Each of the persons and/or entities receiving our securities qualified as an accredited investor (as defined by Rule 501 under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended).

On January 18, 2007, in exchange for $3,500,000, we issued $3,500,000 of 8% senior convertible debentures due December 31, 2009, five-year warrants to purchase up to 636,364 shares of common stock at an initial exercise price of $4.00 per share and five-year warrants to purchase up to 636,364 shares of common stock at an initial exercise price of $6.00 per share. The securities were offered and sold to investors in reliance upon exemptions from registration pursuant to Section 4(2) under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Rule 506 promulgated thereunder. Each of the persons and/or entities receiving our securities qualified as an accredited investor (as defined by Rule 501 under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended).

On January 18, 2007, we issued John Lemak, the principal of WFG Investments, Inc., a five-year warrant to purchase up to 102,444 shares of common stock at an initial exercise price of $4.50. These warrants were issued to Mr. Lemak as compensation for WFG Investment, Inc.’s role as a placement agent in connection with the above described unit offerings.

On January 18, 2007, we issued Ardent Advisors, LLC a five-year warrant to purchase up to 28,778 shares of common stock at an initial exercise price of $4.50. These warrants were issued to Ardent Advisors, LLC as compensation for Ardent Advisor, LLC’s role as a placement agent in connection with the above described unit offerings.

On January 18, 2007, we issued Nexcore Capital, Inc., an affiliate of Ardent Advisors, LLC, a five-year warrant to purchase up to 7,194 shares of common stock at an initial exercise price of $4.50. These warrants were issued to Nexcore Capital, Inc. as compensation for Ardent Advisor, LLC’s role as a placement agent in connection with the above described unit offerings.

On January 18, 2007, we issued Palladium Capital Advisors, LLC a five-year warrant to purchase up to 2,500 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $4.50. These warrants were issued to Palladium Capital Advisors, LLC as compensation for Palladium Capital Advisors, LLC’s role as a placement agent in connection with the above described unit offerings.

On January 18, 2007, we issued Palladium Capital Advisors, LLC a five-year warrant to purchase up to 63,636 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $4.50. These warrants were issued to Palladium Capital Advisors, LLC as compensation for Palladium Capital Advisors, LLC’s role as a placement agent in connection with the above convertible debenture and warrant offering.

All placement agent warrants issued to the placement agents and their affiliates were issued in reliance on exemptions from registration pursuant to Section 4(2) under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Rule 506 promulgated thereunder. Each of the persons and/or entities receiving our placement agent warrants qualified as an accredited investor (as defined by Rule 501 under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended).

II-2

Table of Contents


Item 27.	Exhibits.


Exhibit No.			Description
	2	.1	Agreement of Merger and Plan of Reorganization, dated January 12, 2007, by and among University Girls Calendar, Ltd., Towerstream Acquisition, Inc. and Towerstream Corporation (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of Towerstream Corporation filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 19, 2007).
	3	.1	Certificate of Incorporation of University Girls Calendar, Ltd. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of University Girls Calendar, Ltd. filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 5, 2007).
	3	.2	Certificate of Amendment to Certificate of Incorporation of University Girls Calendar, Ltd., changing the Company’s name to Towerstream Corporation (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.3 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of Towerstream Corporation filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 19, 2007).
	3	.3	By-Laws of Towerstream Corporation (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of Towerstream Corporation filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 19, 2007).
	4	.1	Securities Purchase Agreement, dated as of January 16, 2007, by and among Towerstream Corporation and each purchaser identified on the signature pages thereto (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of Towerstream Corporation filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 19, 2007).
	4	.2	Form of 8% Convertible Debenture due December 31, 2009 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of Towerstream Corporation filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 19, 2007).
	4	.3	Form of Common Stock Purchase Warrant (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.10 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of Towerstream Corporation filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 19, 2007).
	4	.4	Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of January 16, 2007, by and among Towerstream Corporation and the parties thereto (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.10 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of Towerstream Corporation filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 19, 2007).
	4	.5	Form of Private Placement Subscription Agreement (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of Towerstream Corporation filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 19, 2007).
	4	.6	Addendum to Subscription Agreement, dated as of January 16, 2007 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of Towerstream Corporation filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 19, 2007).
	4	.7	Form of Warrant to Purchase Common Stock (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of Towerstream Corporation filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 19, 2007).
	4	.8	Addendum to Warrant to Purchase Common Stock, dated as of January 16, 2007 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of Towerstream Corporation filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 19, 2007).

II-3

Table of Contents


Exhibit No.			Description
	4	.9	Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of January 16, 2007, by and among Towerstream Corporation and the parties thereto (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of Towerstream Corporation filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 19, 2007).
	4	.10	Addendum to Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of January 16, 2007 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of Towerstream Corporation filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 19, 2007).
	4	.11*	Form of Placement Agent Warrant to Purchase Common Stock.
	5	.1**	Opinion of Haynes and Boone, LLP.
	10	.1	Towerstream Corporation 2007 Equity Compensation Plan (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of Towerstream Corporation filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 19, 2007).
	10	.2	Form of 2007 Equity Compensation Plan Incentive Stock Option Agreement (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.18 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of Towerstream Corporation filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 19, 2007).
	10	.3	Form of 2007 Equity Compensation Plan Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.19 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of Towerstream Corporation filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 19, 2007).
	10	.4	Placement Agent Agreement, dated January 5, 2007, by and between Towerstream Corporation and Granite Financial Group, LLC (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.13 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of Towerstream Corporation filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 19, 2007).
	10	.5	Placement Agent Agreement, dated January 4, 2007, by and between Towerstream Corporation and Palladium Capital Advisors, LLC (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.14 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of Towerstream Corporation filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 19, 2007).
	10	.6	Placement Agent Agreement, dated January 8, 2007, by and between Towerstream Corporation and Ardent Advisors, LLC (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.15 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of Towerstream Corporation filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 19, 2007).
	10	.7	Placement Agent Agreement, dated January 3, 2007, by and between Towerstream Corporation and WFG Investments, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.16 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of Towerstream Corporation filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 19, 2007).
	10	.8	Stock Purchase Agreement, dated as of January 3, 2007, by and between University Girls Calendar, Ltd. and Paul Pedersen (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.4 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of University Girls Calendar, Ltd. filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 5, 2007).
	10	.9	Form of Directors and Officers Indemnification Agreement (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.17 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of Towerstream Corporation filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 19, 2007).

II-4

Table of Contents


Exhibit No.			Description
	21	.1	List of Subsidiaries (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 21.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of Towerstream Corporation filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 19, 2007).
	23	.1*	Consent of Marcum & Kliegman LLP.
	23	.2**	Consent of Haynes and Boone, LLP (included in Exhibit 5.1).
	24	.1	Power of Attorney (included on signature page).


*	Filed herewith.


**	To be filed by amendment.


Item 28.	Undertakings.

The undersigned registrant hereby undertakes that it will:

1. File, during any period in which it offers or sells securities, a post-effective amendment to this registration statement to:

i. Include any prospectus required by Section 10(a)(3) of the Securities Act;

ii. Reflect in the prospectus any facts or events which, individually or together, represent a fundamental change in the information in the registration statement. Notwithstanding the forgoing, any increase or decrease in volume of securities offered (if the total dollar value of securities offered would not exceed that which was registered) and any deviation from the low or high end of the estimated maximum offering range may be reflected in the form of prospectus filed with the Commission pursuant to Rule 424(b) if, in the aggregate, the changes in volume and price represent no more than a 20 percent change in the maximum aggregate offering price set forth in the ‘‘Calculation of Registration Fee’’ table in the effective registration statement.

iii. Include any additional or changed material information on the plan of distribution.

2. For determining liability under the Securities Act, treat each post-effective amendment as a new registration statement of the securities offered, and the offering of the securities at that time to be the initial bona fide offering.

3. File a post-effective amendment to remove from registration any of the securities that remain unsold at the end of the offering.

4. For determining liability of the undersigned small business issuer under the Securities Act to any purchaser in the initial distribution of the securities, the undersigned small business issuer undertakes that in a primary offering of securities of the undersigned small business issuer pursuant to this registration statement, regardless of the underwriting method used to sell the securities to the purchaser, if the securities are offered or sold to such purchaser by means of any of the following communications, the undersigned small business issuer will be a seller to the purchaser and will be considered to offer or sell such securities to such purchaser:

i. Any preliminary prospectus or prospectus of the undersigned small business issuer relating to the offering required to be filed pursuant to Rule 424;

ii. Any free writing prospectus relating to the offering prepared by or on behalf of the undersigned small business issuer or used or referred to by the undersigned small business issuer;

iii. The portion of any other free writing prospectus relating to the offering containing material information about the undersigned small business issuer or its securities provided by or on behalf of the undersigned small business issuer; and

iv. Any other communication that is an offer in the offering made by the undersigned small business issuer to the purchaser.

II-5

Table of Contents

5. Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities Act of 1933 (the ‘‘Act’’) may be permitted to directors, officers and controlling persons of the small business issuer pursuant to the foregoing provisions, or otherwise, the small business issuer has been advised that in the opinion of the Securities and Exchange Commission such indemnification is against public policy as express in the Act and is, therefore, unenforceable.

6. For determining any liability under the Securities Act, treat the information omitted from the form of prospectus filed as part of this registration statement in reliance upon Rule 430A and contained in a form of prospectus filed by the small business issuer under Rule 424(b)(1), or (4), or 497(h) under the Securities Act as part of this registration statement as of the time the Commission declared it effective.

7. For determining any liability under the Securities Act, treat each post-effective amendment that contains a form of prospectus as a new registration statement for the securities offered in the registration statement, and that offering of the securities at that time as the initial bona fide offering of those securities.

II-6

Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

In accordance with the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, the registrant certifies that it has reasonable grounds to believe that it meets all of the requirements of filing on Form SB-2 and authorized this registration statement to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, in the City of Middletown, State of Rhode Island on March 19, 2007.

TOWERSTREAM CORPORATION

By:  /s/ Jeffrey M. Thompson
         Name: Jeffrey M. Thompson
         Title: Chief Executive Officer

POWER OF ATTORNEY

KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that the undersigned officers and directors of Towerstream Corporation, a Delaware corporation that is filing a registration statement on Form SB-2 with the Securities and Exchange Commission under the provisions of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, hereby constitute and appoint Jeffrey M. Thompson and George E. Kilguss, III, and each of them, their true and lawful attorneys-in-fact and agents, with full power of substitution and re-substitution, for him and in his name, place and stead, in any and all capacities, to sign any or all amendments to the registration statement, including a prospectus or an amended prospectus therein, and all other documents in connection therewith to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, granting unto said attorneys-in-fact and agents, and each of them, full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done in and about the premises, as fully to all interests and purposes as they might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorneys-in-fact and agents or either of them, or their substitute or substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

In accordance with the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, this registration statement has been signed by the following persons in the capacities and on the dates indicated.


Signature	Title	Date

/s/ Jeffrey M. Thompson	President, Chief Executive Officer and Director (Principal Executive Officer)	March 19, 2007

Jeffrey M. Thompson

/s/ George E. Kilguss, III	Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)	March 19, 2007

George E. Kilguss, III

/s/ Philip Urso	Chairman of the Board of Directors	March 19, 2007

Philip Urso

/s/ Howard L. Haronian	Director	March 19, 2007

Howard L. Haronian

/s/ Paul Koehler	Director	March 19, 2007

Paul Koehler

/s/ William Bush	Director	March 19, 2007

William Bush

II-7

Table of Contents

EXHIBIT INDEX


Exhibit No.			Description
	2	.1	Agreement of Merger and Plan of Reorganization, dated January 12, 2007, by and among University Girls Calendar, Ltd., Towerstream Acquisition, Inc. and Towerstream Corporation (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of Towerstream Corporation filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 19, 2007).
	3	.1	Certificate of Incorporation of University Girls Calendar, Ltd. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of University Girls Calendar, Ltd. filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 5, 2007).
	3	.2	Certificate of Amendment to Certificate of Incorporation of University Girls Calendar, Ltd., changing the Company’s name to Towerstream Corporation (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.3 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of Towerstream Corporation filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 19, 2007).
	3	.3	By-Laws of Towerstream Corporation (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of Towerstream Corporation filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 19, 2007).
	4	.1	Securities Purchase Agreement, dated as of January 16, 2007, by and among Towerstream Corporation and each purchaser identified on the signature pages thereto (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of Towerstream Corporation filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 19, 2007).
	4	.2	Form of 8% Convertible Debenture due December 31, 2009 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of Towerstream Corporation filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 19, 2007).
	4	.3	Form of Common Stock Purchase Warrant (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.10 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of Towerstream Corporation filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 19, 2007).
	4	.4	Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of January 16, 2007, by and among Towerstream Corporation and the parties thereto (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.10 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of Towerstream Corporation filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 19, 2007).
	4	.5	Form of Private Placement Subscription Agreement (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of Towerstream Corporation filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 19, 2007).
	4	.6	Addendum to Subscription Agreement, dated as of January 16, 2007 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of Towerstream Corporation filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 19, 2007).
	4	.7	Form of Warrant to Purchase Common Stock (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of Towerstream Corporation filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 19, 2007).
	4	.8	Addendum to Warrant to Purchase Common Stock, dated as of January 16, 2007 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of Towerstream Corporation filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 19, 2007).

Table of Contents


Exhibit No.			Description
	4	.9	Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of January 16, 2007, by and among Towerstream Corporation and the parties thereto (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of Towerstream Corporation filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 19, 2007).
	4	.10	Addendum to Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of January 16, 2007 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of Towerstream Corporation filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 19, 2007).
	4	.11*	Form of Placement Agent Warrant to Purchase Common Stock.
	5	.1**	Opinion of Haynes and Boone, LLP.
	10	.1	Towerstream Corporation 2007 Equity Compensation Plan (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of Towerstream Corporation filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 19, 2007).
	10	.2	Form of 2007 Equity Compensation Plan Incentive Stock Option Agreement (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.18 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of Towerstream Corporation filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 19, 2007).
	10	.3	Form of 2007 Equity Compensation Plan Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.19 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of Towerstream Corporation filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 19, 2007).
	10	.4	Placement Agent Agreement, dated January 5, 2007, by and between Towerstream Corporation and Granite Financial Group, LLC (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.13 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of Towerstream Corporation filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 19, 2007).
	10	.5	Placement Agent Agreement, dated January 4, 2007, by and between Towerstream Corporation and Palladium Capital Advisors, LLC (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.14 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of Towerstream Corporation filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 19, 2007).
	10	.6	Placement Agent Agreement, dated January 8, 2007, by and between Towerstream Corporation and Ardent Advisors, LLC (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.15 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of Towerstream Corporation filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 19, 2007).
	10	.7	Placement Agent Agreement, dated January 3, 2007, by and between Towerstream Corporation and WFG Investments, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.16 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of Towerstream Corporation filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 19, 2007).
	10	.8	Stock Purchase Agreement, dated as of January 3, 2007, by and between University Girls Calendar, Ltd. and Paul Pedersen (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.4 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of University Girls Calendar, Ltd. filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 5, 2007).
	10	.9	Form of Directors and Officers Indemnification Agreement (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.17 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of Towerstream Corporation filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 19, 2007).

Table of Contents


Exhibit No.			Description
	21	.1	List of Subsidiaries (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 21.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of Towerstream Corporation filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 19, 2007).
	23	.1*	Consent of Marcum & Kliegman LLP.
	23	.2**	Consent of Haynes and Boone, LLP (included in Exhibit 5.1).
	24	.1	Power of Attorney (included on signature page).

* Filed herewith.

** To be filed by amendment.


Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm			F-2
Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2006			F-3
Statements of Operations for the Years Ended December 31, 2006 and 2005			F-4
Statements of Stockholder’s Equity for the Years Ended December 31, 2006 and 2005			F-5
Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended December 31, 2006 and 2005			F-6
Notes to Financial Statements			F-7
Introduction to Pro Form Condensed Combined Financial Statements			F-21
Pro Forma Unaudited Condensed Combined Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2006			F-23
Notes to Pro Forma Unaudited Condensed Combined Financial Statements			F-24

(State or jurisdiction of
Incorporation or organization)

(Primary Standard Industrial
Classification Code Number)

(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)