<DOCUMENT>
<TYPE>10-Q
<SEQUENCE>1
<FILENAME>dwsx.txt
<DESCRIPTION>SPECTRUM CURRENCY
<TEXT>
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

[X] QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2006 or

[ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from to__________________

Commission File Number 0-31563

MORGAN STANLEY SPECTRUM CURRENCY L.P.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware 13-4084211
(State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization) Identification No.)

Demeter Management Corporation
330 Madison Avenue, 8th Floor
New York, NY 10017
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)

Registrant?s telephone number, including area code (212) 905-2700

(Former name, former address, and former fiscal year, if changed since
last report)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports
required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period
that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes X No___________

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated
filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition
of ?accelerated filer and large accelerated filer? in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer___Accelerated filer___Non-accelerated filer X

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as
defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes___ No X

<page> <table> MORGAN STANLEY SPECTRUM CURRENCY L.P.

INDEX TO QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q

September 30, 2006

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
<s> <c>
Item 1. Financial Statements

Statements of Financial Condition as of September 30, 2006
(Unaudited) and December 31, 2005 2

Statements of Operations for the Three and Nine Months
Ended September 30, 2006 and 2005 (Unaudited) 3

Statements of Changes in Partners? Capital for the
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2006 and 2005 (Unaudited) 4

Statements of Cash Flows for the Nine Months
Ended September 30, 2006 and 2005 (Unaudited) 5

Notes to Financial Statements (Unaudited) 6-12

Item 2. Management?s Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations 13-27

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about
Market Risk 27-37

Item 4. Controls and Procedures 37-38

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1A.Risk Factors 39

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of
Proceeds. .39-40

Item 5. Other Information 40-41

Item 6. Exhibits 41-42
</table>

<page> <table> PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements

MORGAN STANLEY SPECTRUM CURRENCY L.P.
STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
<caption>

September 30, December 31,
2006 2005
$ $
(Unaudited)
ASSETS
<s> <c> <c>
Equity in futures interests trading accounts:
Unrestricted cash 166,747,983 207,952,625

Total cash 166,747,983 207,952,625

Net unrealized gain on open contracts (MS & Co.) 417,894 6,202,194

Total Trading Equity 167,165,877 214,154,819

Subscriptions receivable 1,064,888 1,355,204
Interest receivable (Morgan Stanley DW) 557,488 559,983

Total Assets 168,788,253 216,070,006

LIABILITIES AND PARTNERS? CAPITAL

Liabilities

Redemptions payable 4,101,389 6,346,278
Accrued brokerage fees (Morgan Stanley DW) 653,219 862,131
Accrued management fees 284,009 374,840

Total Liabilities 5,038,617 7,583,249

Partners? Capital

Limited Partners (15,210,869.829 and
17,508,991.514 Units, respectively) 161,903,717 206,199,270
General Partner (173,424.343 and
194,237.343 Units, respectively) 1,845,919 2,287,487

Total Partners? Capital 163,749,636 208,486,757

Total Liabilities and Partners? Capital 168,788,253 216,070,006

NET ASSET VALUE PER UNIT 10.64 11.78
<fn>
The accompanying notes are an integral part
of these financial statements.
</table>
<page> <table> MORGAN STANLEY SPECTRUM CURRENCY L.P.
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)

For the Three Months For the Nine Months
Ended September 30, Ended September 30,

2006 2005 2006 2005
$ $ $ $
<s> <c> <c> <c> <c>
INVESTMENT INCOME
Interest income (Morgan Stanley DW) 1,705,588 1,491,227 4,993,972 3,782,453

EXPENSES
Brokerage fees (Morgan Stanley DW) 1,936,660 2,772,180 6,290,559 8,355,285
Management fees 842,025 1,205,299 2,735,026 3,632,735

Total Expenses 2,778,685 3,977,479 9,025,585 11,988,020

NET INVESTMENT LOSS (1,073,097) (2,486,252) (4,031,613) (8,205,567)

TRADING RESULTS
Trading profit (loss):
Realized (69,123) (4,003,991) (9,699,810) (26,815,297)
Net change in unrealized 498,270 (12,118,505) (5,784,300) (14,905,562)

Total Trading Results 429,147 (16,122,496) (15,484,110) (41,720,859)

NET LOSS (643,950) (18,608,748) (19,515,723) (49,926,426)

NET LOSS ALLOCATION

Limited Partners (636,993) (18,404,932) (19,305,522) (49,390,318)
General Partner (6,957) (203,816) (210,201) (536,108)

NET LOSS PER UNIT

Limited Partners (0.04) (0.96) (1.14) (2.63)
General Partner (0.04) (0.96) (1.14) (2.63)

<fn>

The accompanying notes are an integral part
of these financial statements.
</table>
<page> <table> MORGAN STANLEY SPECTRUM CURRENCY L.P.
STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN PARTNERS? CAPITAL
For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2006 and 2005
(Unaudited)

Units of
Partnership Limited General
Interest Partners Partner Total
$ $ $

<s> <c> <c> <c> <c>
Partners? Capital,
December 31, 2004 18,954,389.185 270,231,305 2,869,425 273,100,730

Offering of Units 2,981,240.348 36,025,172 170,000 36,195,172

Net Loss ? (49,390,318) (536,108) (49,926,426)

Redemptions (2,955,919.524) (35,721,850) ? (35,721,850)

Partners? Capital,
September 30, 2005 18,979,710.009 221,144,309 2,503,317 223,647,626

Partners? Capital,
December 31, 2005 17,703,228.857 206,199,270 2,287,487 208,486,757

Offering of Units 1,313,459.877 14,258,583 ? 14,258,583

Net Loss ? (19,305,522) (210,201) (19,515,723)

Redemptions (3,632,394.562) (39,248,614) (231,367) (39,479,981)

Partners? Capital,
September 30, 2006 15,384,294.172 161,903,717 1,845,919 163,749,636

<fn>

The accompanying notes are an integral part
of these financial statements.
</table>
<page> <table> MORGAN STANLEY SPECTRUM CURRENCY L.P.
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)

For the Nine Months Ended September 30,

2006 2005
$ $

<s> <c> <c>
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES

Net loss (19,515,723) (49,926,426)
Noncash item included in net loss:
Net change in unrealized 5,784,300 14,905,562

(Increase) decrease in operating assets:
Restricted cash ? 166,662
Interest receivable (Morgan Stanley DW) 2,495 (188,146)

Decrease in operating liabilities:
Accrued brokerage fees (Morgan Stanley DW) (208,912) (133,155)
Accrued management fees (90,831) (57,894)

Net cash used for operating activities (14,028,671) (35,233,397)

CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES

Cash received from offering of Units 14,548,899 41,165,829
Cash paid for redemptions of Units (41,724,870) (33,141,664)

Net cash provided by (used for) financing activities (27,175,971) 8,024,165

Net decrease in unrestricted cash (41,204,642) (27,209,232)

Unrestricted cash at beginning of period 207,952,625 253,222,567

Unrestricted cash at end of period 166,747,983 226,013,335

<fn>
The accompanying notes are an integral part
of these financial statements.

</table>

<page> MORGAN STANLEY SPECTRUM CURRENCY L.P.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

September 30, 2006

(Unaudited)

The unaudited financial statements contained herein include, in
the opinion of management, all adjustments necessary for a fair
presentation of the results of operations and financial condition
of Morgan Stanley Spectrum Currency L.P. (the ?Partnership?).
The financial statements and condensed notes herein should be
read in conjunction with the Partnership?s December 31, 2005
Annual Report on Form 10-K. Certain prior year amounts relating
to cash balances were reclassified on the Statements of Financial
Condition and the related Statements of Cash Flows to conform to
2006 presentation. Such reclassifications have no impact on the
Partnership?s reported net income (loss).

1. Organization
Morgan Stanley Spectrum Currency L.P. is a Delaware limited
partnership organized in 1999 to engage primarily in the
speculative trading of futures contracts, options on futures
contracts, and forward contracts in global currency markets. The
Partnership is one of the Morgan Stanley Spectrum Series of
funds, comprised of the Partnership, Morgan Stanley Spectrum
Global Balanced L.P., Morgan Stanley Spectrum Select L.P., Morgan
Stanley Spectrum Strategic L.P., and Morgan Stanley Spectrum
Technical L.P.
<page> MORGAN STANLEY SPECTRUM CURRENCY L.P.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

The Partnership?s general partner is Demeter Management
Corporation (?Demeter?). The non-clearing commodity broker is
Morgan Stanley DW Inc. (?Morgan Stanley DW?). The clearing
commodity broker is Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated (?MS &
Co.?). Demeter, Morgan Stanley DW, and MS & Co. are wholly-owned
subsidiaries of Morgan Stanley. The trading advisors to the
Partnership are John W. Henry & Company, Inc. and Sunrise Capital
Partners, LLC (individually, a ?Trading Advisor?, or
collectively, the ?Trading Advisors?).

2. Related Party Transactions
The Partnership?s cash is on deposit with Morgan Stanley DW and
MS & Co. in futures, forwards, and options trading accounts to
meet margin requirements as needed. Monthly, Morgan Stanley DW
pays the Partnership interest income equal to 80% of the month?s
average daily Net Assets at a rate equal to a prevailing rate on
U.S. Treasury bills. The Partnership pays brokerage fees to
Morgan Stanley DW.

3. Financial Instruments
The Partnership trades futures contracts, options on futures
contracts, and forward contracts in global currency markets.
Futures and forwards represent contracts for delayed delivery of
an instrument at a specified date and price. Risk arises from

<page> MORGAN STANLEY SPECTRUM CURRENCY L.P.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

changes in the value of these contracts and the potential
inability of counterparties to perform under the terms of the
contracts. There are numerous factors which may significantly
influence the market value of these contracts, including interest
rate volatility.

The market value of exchange-traded contracts is based on the
settlement price quoted by the exchange on the day with respect
to which market value is being determined. If an exchange-traded
contract could not have been liquidated on such day due to the
operation of daily limits or other rules of the exchange, the
settlement price shall be the settlement price on the first
subsequent day on which the contract could be liquidated. The
market value of off-exchange-traded contracts is based on the
fair market value quoted by the counterparty.

The Partnership?s contracts are accounted for on a trade-date
basis and marked to market on a daily basis. The Partnership
accounts for its derivative investments in accordance with the
provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No.
133, ?Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging
Activities? (?SFAS No. 133?). SFAS No. 133 defines a derivative

<page> MORGAN STANLEY SPECTRUM CURRENCY L.P.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

as a financial instrument or other contract that has all three of
the following characteristics:

1) One or more underlying notional amounts or payment
provisions;
2) Requires no initial net investment or a smaller initial net
investment than would be required relative to changes in
market factors;
3) Terms require or permit net settlement.

Generally, derivatives include futures, forward, swap or options
contracts, and other financial instruments with similar
characteristics such as caps, floors, and collars.

The net unrealized gains on open contracts, reported as a
component of ?Equity in futures interests trading accounts? on the
Statements of Financial Condition, and their longest contract
maturities were as follows:

Net Unrealized Gains
on Open Contracts Longest Maturities

Exchange- Off-Exchange- Exchange- Off-Exchange-
Date Traded Traded Total Traded Traded
$ $ $

Sep. 30, 2006 - 417,894 417,894 - Dec. 2006
Dec. 31, 2005 - 6,202,194 6,202,194 - Mar. 2006

<page> MORGAN STANLEY SPECTRUM CURRENCY L.P.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

The Partnership has credit risk associated with counterparty non-
performance. As of the date of the financial statements, the
credit risk associated with the instruments in which the
Partnership trades is limited to the amounts reflected in the
Partnership?s Statements of Financial Condition.

The Partnership also has credit risk because Morgan Stanley DW
and MS & Co. act as the futures commission merchants or the
counterparties, with respect to most of the Partnership?s assets.
Exchange-traded futures, forward, and futures-styled options
contracts are marked to market on a daily basis, with variations
in value settled on a daily basis. Morgan Stanley DW and MS &
Co., each as a futures commission merchant for the Partnership?s
exchange-traded futures, forward, and futures-styled options
contracts, are required, pursuant to regulations of the Commodity

Futures Trading Commission (?CFTC?), to segregate from their own
assets, and for the sole benefit of their commodity customers,
all funds held by them with respect to exchange-traded futures,
forward, and futures-styled options contracts, including an
amount equal to the net unrealized gains on all open futures,
forward, and futures-styled options contracts. With respect to
the Partnership?s off-exchange-traded forward currency contracts,
there are no daily exchange-required settlements of variation in
value, nor is there any requirement that an amount equal to the
<page> MORGAN STANLEY SPECTRUM CURRENCY L.P.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

net unrealized gains (losses) on open forward contracts be
segregated. However, the Partnership is required to meet margin
requirements equal to the net unrealized loss on open contracts
in the Partnership accounts with the counterparty, which is
accomplished by daily maintenance of the cash balance in a
custody account held at Morgan Stanley DW for the benefit of MS &
Co. With respect to those off-exchange-traded forward currency
contracts, the Partnership is at risk to the ability of MS & Co.,
the sole counterparty on all such contracts, to perform. The
Partnership has a netting agreement with MS & Co. This
agreement, which seeks to reduce both the Partnership?s and MS &
Co.?s exposure on off-exchange-traded forward currency contracts,
should materially decrease the Partnership?s credit risk in the
event of MS & Co.?s bankruptcy or insolvency.

4. New Accounting Developments
In July 2006, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 48,
?Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes, an interpretation of
FASB Statement No. 109? (?FIN 48?). FIN 48 clarifies the
accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in a
company?s financial statements and prescribes a recognition
threshold and measurement attribute for the financial statement
recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to
be taken in an income tax return. FIN 48 also provides guidance on
<page> MORGAN STANLEY SPECTRUM CURRENCY L.P.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONCLUDED)

derecognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting
in interim periods, disclosure and transition. FIN 48 is effective
for the Partnership as of January 1, 2007. The Partnership is cur-
rently evaluating the potential impact of adopting FIN 48.

In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, ?Fair Value
Measurements? (?SFAS No. 157?). SFAS No. 157 defines fair value,
establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands
disclosures about fair value measurements. SFAS No. 157 is
effective for the Partnership as of January 1, 2008 . The Partner-
ship is currently evaluating the potential impact of adopting SFAS
No. 157.

<page> Item 2. MANAGEMENT?S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL
CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Liquidity. The Partnership deposits its assets with Morgan
Stanley DW as non-clearing broker, and MS & Co. as clearing broker
in separate futures, forwards, and options trading accounts
established for each Trading Advisor. Such assets are used as
margin to engage in trading and may be used as margin solely for
the Partnership?s trading. The assets are held in either non-
interest bearing bank accounts or in securities and instruments
permitted by the CFTC for investment of customer segregated or
secured funds. Since the Partnership?s sole purpose is to trade
in futures, forwards, and options, it is expected that the
Partnership will continue to own such liquid assets for margin
purposes.

The Partnership?s investment in futures, forwards, and options
may, from time to time, be illiquid. Most U.S. futures exchanges
limit fluctuations in prices during a single day by regulations
referred to as ?daily price fluctuations limits? or ?daily
limits?. Trades may not be executed at prices beyond the daily
limit. If the price for a particular futures or options contract
has increased or decreased by an amount equal to the daily limit,
positions in that futures or options contract can neither be taken
nor liquidated unless traders are willing to effect trades at or
within the limit. Futures prices have occasionally moved the daily
limit for several consecutive days with little or no trading.
<page> These market conditions could prevent the Partnership from
promptly liquidating its futures or options contracts and result
in restrictions on redemptions.

There is no limitation on daily price moves in trading forward
contracts on foreign currencies. The markets for some world
currencies have low trading volume and are illiquid, which may
prevent the Partnership from trading in potentially profitable
markets or prevent the Partnership from promptly liquidating
unfavorable positions in such markets, subjecting it to
substantial losses. Either of these market conditions could
result in restrictions on redemptions. For the periods covered
by this report, illiquidity has not materially affected the
Partnership?s assets.

There are no known material trends, demands, commitments, events,
or uncertainties at the present time that are reasonably likely
to result in the Partnership?s liquidity increasing or decreasing
in any material way.

Capital Resources. The Partnership does not have, nor does it
expect to have, any capital assets. Redemptions, exchanges, and
sales of units of limited partnership interest (?Unit(s)?) in the
future will affect the amount of funds available for investments
in futures, forwards, and options in subsequent periods. It is not
<page> possible to estimate the amount, and therefore the impact,
of future inflows and outflows of Units.

There are no known material trends, favorable or unfavorable,
that would affect, nor any expected material changes to, the
Partnership?s capital resource arrangements at the present time.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements and Contractual Obligations. The
Partnership does not have any off-balance sheet arrangements, nor
does it have contractual obligations or commercial commitments to
make future payments that would affect its liquidity or capital
resources.

Results of Operations
General. The Partnership?s results depend on the Trading
Advisors and the ability of each Trading Advisor?s trading
program to take advantage of price movements in the futures,
forwards, and options markets. The following presents a summary
of the Partnership?s operations for the three and nine month
periods ended September 30, 2006 and 2005, and a general
discussion of its trading activities during each period. It is
important to note, however, that the Trading Advisors trade in
various markets at different times and that prior activity in a
particular market does not mean that such market will be actively
traded by the Trading Advisors or will be profitable in the
future. Consequently, the results of operations of the Partnership
<page> are difficult to discuss other than in the context of the
Trading Advisors? trading activities on behalf of the Partnership
during the period in question. Past performance is no guarantee of
future results.

The Partnership?s results of operations set forth in the
financial statements on pages 2 through 12 of this report are
prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America, which require the use
of certain accounting policies that affect the amounts reported
in these financial statements, including the following: The
contracts the Partnership trades are accounted for on a trade-
date basis and marked to market on a daily basis. The difference
between their cost and market value is recorded on the Statements
of Operations as ?Net change in unrealized trading profit (loss)?
for open (unrealized) contracts, and recorded as ?Realized
trading profit (loss)? when open positions are closed out. The
sum of these amounts constitutes the Partnership?s trading
results. The market value of a futures contract is the settlement
price on the exchange on which that futures contract is traded on
a particular day. The value of foreign currency forward
contracts is based on the spot rate as of the close of business.
Interest income, as well as management fees, incentive fees, and
brokerage fees expenses of the Partnership are recorded on an
accrual basis.

<page> Demeter believes that, based on the nature of the
operations of the Partnership, no assumptions relating to the
application of critical accounting policies other than those
presently used could reasonably affect reported amounts.

For the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2006
The Partnership recorded total trading results including interest
income totaling $2,134,735 and expenses totaling $2,778,685,
resulting in a net loss of $643,950 for the three months ended
September 30, 2006. The Partnership?s net asset value per Unit
decreased from $10.68 at June 30, 2006 to $10.64 at September 30,
2006.

The most significant trading losses of approximately 1.7%
resulted from long positions in the euro versus the U.S. dollar,
primarily during July, as the value of the euro moved lower after
the European Central Bank decided to keep its key interest rate
unchanged. Elsewhere, losses of approximately 1.2% were incurred
during July from short positions in the South African rand versus
the U.S. dollar as the value of the rand moved higher in tandem
with increasing commodity prices. Additional losses were
incurred from newly established long positions in the South
African rand versus the U.S. dollar during August as the value of
the rand weakened against the U.S. dollar after the release of
data showing South Africa?s trade deficit widened more-than-
expected. During September, losses of approximately 0.8%, 0.7%,
and 0.3%, respectively, were recorded from long positions in the
<page> Singapore dollar, Mexican peso, and Australian dollar
against the U.S. dollar as the value of the U.S. dollar increased
against these currencies after government reports showed U.S.
consumer confidence rebounded in September. In addition, the
value of the Mexican peso declined after investors expressed
concern that a military coup in Thailand would have a ?ripple-
effect? on other emerging-market currencies. Finally, smaller
losses of approximately 0.3% resulted from both long and short
positions in the U.S. dollar relative to the Czech koruna and the
Polish zloty as the value of these currencies moved without
consistent direction throughout a majority of the quarter. A
portion of the Partnership?s overall losses for the quarter was
offset by gains of approximately 5.7% and 0.5%, respectively,
from positions in the U.S. dollar relative to the Japanese yen
and British pound. During August, gains were recorded from short
positions in the Japanese yen versus the U.S. dollar as the value
of the yen weakened against most of its major rivals after the
Japanese Consumer Price Index for July came in lower-than-
expected, diminishing expectations of another interest rate hike
by the Bank of Japan this year. The value of the yen continued
to trend lower in September after a report showed Japanese
consumer confidence fell in August, resulting in further gains
from short positions against the U.S. dollar. During July, gains
were also experienced from long positions in the British pound
versus the U.S. dollar as the value of the pound increased on
solid housing and consumer price data out of the United Kingdom.
<page> In addition, the value of the British pound was pressured
higher after the Bank of England unexpectedly lifted its key
interest rate in August.

The Partnership recorded total trading results including interest
income totaling $(10,490,138) and expenses totaling $9,025,585,
resulting in a net loss of $19,515,723 for the nine months ended
September 30, 2006. The Partnership?s net asset value per Unit
decreased from $11.78 at December 31, 2005 to $10.64 at September
30, 2006.

The most significant trading losses of approximately 3.9%, 2.9%,
and 2.1%, respectively, resulted from short positions in the
Swiss franc, Japanese yen, and Australian dollar versus the U.S.
dollar during the first six months of the year. The Swiss franc
and Japanese yen moved higher against the U.S. dollar during
January and February as strong economic data out of Switzerland
and Japan increased speculation that the Swiss National Bank and
Bank of Japan might raise interest rates. In addition, the
Japanese yen strengthened during April on speculation of a
possible Bank of Japan interest rate hike, while the Swiss franc
moved higher on geopolitical tensions in the Middle East.
Meanwhile, the Australian dollar also moved higher on an
unexpected interest rate hike by the Reserve Bank of Australia in
May. Finally, the U.S. dollar moved lower during April and May
on news that foreign central banks were beginning to diversify
<page> their currency reserves away from U.S. dollar-denominated
assets, as well as uncertainty regarding the future of the U.S.
Federal Reserve?s interest rate tightening campaign. Further
losses of approximately 1.2% were experienced primarily during
May and June from long positions in the Brazilian real, as well
as both long and short positions in the Polish zloty, as the
value of the Brazilian real moved lower on political concerns,
while the value of the Polish zloty moved without consistent
direction. A portion of the Partnership?s overall losses in the
first nine months of the year was offset by gains of
approximately 1.5%, 1.0%, and 0.7%, respectively, recorded from
positions in the South African rand, euro, and British pound
versus the U.S. dollar. The South African rand weakened against
the U.S. dollar during June as the value of this ?commodity-
currency? fell in tandem with falling gold prices. Meanwhile,
the euro strengthened relative to the U.S. dollar during April
and May after Dutch Finance Minister Gerritt Zalm said that the
European Central Bank would not intervene to halt the
appreciation of the euro, as well as on increased expectations of
an interest rate hike in the near-future by the European Central
Bank. During July, gains were achieved from long positions in
the British pound versus the U.S. dollar as the value of the
pound increased on solid housing and consumer price data out of
the United Kingdom. In addition, the value of the British pound
was pressured higher after the Bank of England unexpectedly
lifted its key interest rate in August. Finally, smaller gains
<page> of approximately 0.8% resulted from long positions in the
Singapore dollar relative to the U.S. dollar as the value of the
Singapore dollar benefited from U.S. dollar?s weakness during
April and May, while short positions in the New Zealand dollar
versus the U.S. dollar experienced gains during March as the
value of the New Zealand dollar continued to trend lower on
expectations for an economic slow-down in New Zealand.

For the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2005
The Partnership recorded total trading results including interest
income totaling $(14,631,269) and expenses totaling $3,977,479,
resulting in a net loss of $18,608,748 for the three months ended
September 30, 2005. The Partnership?s net asset value per Unit
decreased from $12.74 at June 30, 2005 to $11.78 at September 30,
2005.

The most significant trading losses of approximately 4.0%, 1.4%,
0.9%, 0.6%, and 0.6%, respectively, resulted from positions in
the British pound, Norwegian krone, both the New Zealand and
Australian dollars, and the Czech koruna. During July, long
positions in the British pound versus the U.S. dollar experienced
losses as the value of the pound dropped sharply on geopolitical
concerns after a terror attack on the London public
transportation system. During August, long U.S. dollar positions
against the British pound, Norwegian krone, and Czech koruna
<page> incurred losses as the value of the U.S. dollar declined
amid higher crude oil prices, lower durable goods orders, the
U.S. trade imbalance, and economic warnings from U.S. Federal
Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan. Strong signals of euro-zone
economic improvement also supported the advance of the British
pound, Norwegian krone, and Czech koruna. Short positions in the
New Zealand and Australian dollars versus the U.S. dollar
recorded losses as the values of those currencies moved higher on
strong economic data out of the region. During September, losses
were recorded from short U.S. dollar positions against the
British pound, Norwegian krone, Czech koruna, and both the
Australian and New Zealand dollars, as the value of the U.S.
dollar advanced amid bolstered expectations that the U.S. Federal
Reserve would continue to raise interest rates. Also forcing the
New Zealand dollar lower against the U.S. dollar were fears for
an economic slow-down in New Zealand during 2006. Additional
losses of approximately 1.0% were recorded from positions in the
Singapore dollar against the U.S. dollar. During July, short
positions recorded losses after the Singapore dollar?s value
reversed higher in response to market expectations for future
economic growth in Singapore. During August, losses stemmed from
long Singapore dollar positions after the value of the Singapore
dollar finished lower in response to disappointing export data.
Finally, smaller Partnership losses of approximately 0.1% were
recorded during August from short positions in the Swiss franc
<page> against the U.S. dollar after the value of the U.S. dollar
weakened on disappointing economic data. A portion of the
Partnership?s overall losses for the quarter was offset by gains
of approximately 1.7% from short positions in the Japanese yen
versus the U.S. dollar during July and September. During July,
gains resulted after the U.S. dollar?s value strengthened against
the yen on significant interest rate differentials between the
U.S. and Japan. Market participants also drove the U.S. dollar
higher against the yen amid beliefs that U.S. interest rates
would increase further, the release of strong U.S. economic data,
and news that the U.S. Current-Account deficit had narrowed.
During September, short Japanese yen positions achieved gains
after the yen?s value declined in the wake of weak Japanese
economic data, including industrial production, salaried
household spending, and the Tokyo consumer price index.

The Partnership recorded total trading results including interest
income totaling $(37,938,406) and expenses totaling $11,988,020,
resulting in a net loss of $49,926,426 for the nine months ended
September 30, 2005. The Partnership?s net asset value per Unit
decreased from $14.41 at December 31, 2004 to $11.78 at September
30, 2005.

The most significant trading losses of approximately 12.2%
resulted from positions in European currencies against the U.S.
<page> dollar. Early during the first quarter, losses resulted
from long positions in the British pound, Norwegian krone, euro,
Czech koruna, and Swedish krona versus the U.S. dollar after the
U.S. dollar?s value reversed sharply higher amid an increase in
U.S. interest rates and consumer prices. The U.S. dollar?s value
also advanced in response to expectations that the Chinese
government would announce postponement of its re-valuation of the
Chinese yuan. During February, losses were incurred from short
European currency positions after the U.S. dollar?s value
weakened in response to concern for the considerable U.S.
Current-Account deficit as expressed by U.S. Federal Reserve
Chairman Alan Greenspan. During early March, short European
currency positions continued to experience losses as their values
moved higher amid a sharp rise in German industrial production.
Further losses were recorded from newly established long European
currency positions versus the U.S. dollar as the U.S. dollar?s
value reversed sharply higher amid an increase in U.S. interest
rates and consumer prices. During the second quarter, long
British pound positions incurred losses as the pound?s value
declined after British Prime Minister Tony Blair's Labour Party
won re-election with a reduced government majority, and then
moved lower later in the quarter on growing speculation that the
interest rate differential between the U.S. and the U.K. would
tighten. During July, long British pound positions experienced
losses as the value of the pound dropped sharply on geopolitical
<page> concerns after a terror attack on the London public
transportation system. During August, short British pound
positions incurred losses as the value of the U.S. dollar
declined amid higher crude oil prices, lower durable goods
orders, the U.S. trade imbalance, and economic warnings from U.S.
Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan. During September,
losses were recorded from long positions in the British pound,
Norwegian krone, and Czech koruna, as the value of the U.S.
dollar advanced amid bolstered expectations that the U.S. Federal
Reserve would continue to raise interest rates. Additional
losses of approximately 5.5%, 2.1%, and 1.7%, respectively, were
recorded from positions in the South African rand and both the
New Zealand and Australian dollars (collectively the ?Commodity
Currencies?). During the first quarter, losses stemmed from both
long and short positions against the yen versus the U.S. dollar
as the values of the Commodity Currencies traded counter to the
U.S. dollar, which benefited due to positive economic data.
During the second quarter, long positions in the Australian
dollar versus the U.S. dollar produced losses as the Australian
dollar declined amid falling gold prices. During the third
quarter, short positions in the New Zealand and Australian
dollars versus the U.S. dollar recorded losses as the values of
the Commodity Currencies moved higher on strong economic data out
of the region. During September, losses were recorded from long
Australian and New Zealand dollar positions as the value of the
<page> U.S. dollar advanced amid bolstered expectations that the
U.S. Federal Reserve would continue to raise interest rates. Also
forcing the New Zealand dollar against the U.S. dollar lower were
fears for an economic slow-down in New Zealand during 2006.
Partnership losses of approximately 2.9% were recorded primarily
during the first quarter from positions in the Singapore dollar
versus the U.S. dollar. During February, long positions in the
Singapore dollar against the U.S. dollar incurred losses early in
the month as the U.S. dollar?s value benefited from positive
economic sentiment. Newly established short Singapore dollar
positions also incurred losses later in the month after the U.S.
dollar weakened due to a larger-than-expected drop in January
leading economic indicators and news that South Korea?s Central
Bank planned to reduce its U.S. dollar currency reserves. During
March, long positions in the Singapore dollar versus the U.S.
dollar resulted in losses as the value of the U.S. dollar
reversed sharply higher amid an increase in U.S. interest rates
and U.S. consumer prices. Positions in the Singapore dollar
against the U.S. dollar held during the third quarter also
contributed to sector losses. A portion of the Partnership?s
overall losses for the first nine months of the year was offset
by gains of approximately 4.4% from short positions in the
Japanese yen against the U.S. dollar. During March, gains
resulted as the U.S. dollar advanced against the yen due to an
increase in U.S. interest rates by the U.S. Federal Reserve.
<page> Short Japanese yen positions held during the second
quarter produced profits as the yen?s value declined during May
and June in response to weak Japanese economic data. During
July, gains resulted after the U.S. dollar?s value strengthened
against the yen on significant interest rate differentials
between the U.S. and Japan. Market participants also drove the
U.S. dollar higher against the yen during July amid beliefs that
U.S. interest rates would increase further, the release of strong
U.S. economic data, and news that the U.S. Current-Account
deficit had narrowed. During September, short Japanese yen
positions achieved gains after the yen?s value declined in the
wake of weak Japanese economic data, including industrial
production, salaried household spending, and the Tokyo consumer
price index.

Item 3.QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Introduction
The Partnership is a commodity pool engaged primarily in the
speculative trading of futures, forwards, and options. The
market-sensitive instruments held by the Partnership are acquired
for speculative trading purposes only and, as a result, all or
substantially all of the Partnership?s assets are at risk of
trading loss. Unlike an operating company, the risk of market-
sensitive instruments is inherent to the primary business
activity of the Partnership.
<page>
The futures, forwards, and options traded by the Partnership
involve varying degrees of related market risk. Market risk is
often dependent upon changes in the level or volatility of
interest rates, exchange rates, and prices of financial
instruments and commodities, factors that result in frequent
changes in the fair value of the Partnership?s open positions,
and consequently in its earnings, whether realized or unrealized,
and cash flow. Gains and losses on open positions of exchange-
traded futures, forwards, and options are settled daily through
variation margin. Gains and losses on off-exchange-traded
forward currency contracts are settled upon termination of the
contract. However, the Partnership is required to meet margin
requirements equal to the net unrealized loss on open contracts
in the Partnership accounts with the counterparty, which is
accomplished by daily maintenance of the cash balance in a
custody account held at Morgan Stanley DW for the benefit of MS &
Co.

The Partnership?s total market risk may increase or decrease as
it is influenced by a wide variety of factors, including, but not
limited to, the diversification among the Partnership?s open
positions, the volatility present within the markets, and the
liquidity of the markets.

<page> The face value of the market sector instruments held by
the Partnership is typically many times the applicable margin
requirements. Margin requirements generally range between 2% and
15% of contract face value. Additionally, the use of leverage
causes the face value of the market sector instruments held by
the Partnership typically to be many times the total
capitalization of the Partnership.

The Partnership?s past performance is no guarantee of its future
results. Any attempt to numerically quantify the Partnership?s
market risk is limited by the uncertainty of its speculative
trading. The Partnership?s speculative trading and use of
leverage may cause future losses and volatility (i.e., ?risk of
ruin?) that far exceed the Partnership?s experience to date under
the ?Partnership?s Value at Risk in Different Market Sectors?
section and significantly exceed the Value at Risk (?VAR?) tables
disclosed.

Limited partners will not be liable for losses exceeding the
current net asset value of their investment.

Quantifying the Partnership?s Trading Value at Risk
The following quantitative disclosures regarding the Partner-
ship?s market risk exposures contain ?forward-looking statements?
within the meaning of the safe harbor from civil liability
provided for such statements by the Private Securities Litigation
<page> Reform Act of 1995 (set forth in Section 27A of the
Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934). All quantitative disclosures in this section are
deemed to be forward-looking statements for purposes of the safe
harbor, except for statements of historical fact.

The Partnership accounts for open positions on the basis of mark
to market accounting principles. Any loss in the market value of
the Partnership?s open positions is directly reflected in the
Partnership?s earnings and cash flow.

The Partnership?s risk exposure in the market sectors traded by
the Trading Advisors is estimated below in terms of VaR. The
Partnership estimates VaR using a model based upon historical
simulation (with a confidence level of 99%) which involves
constructing a distribution of hypothetical daily changes in the
value of a trading portfolio. The VaR model takes into account
linear exposures to risk including equity and commodity prices,
interest rates, foreign exchange rates, and correlation among
these variables. The hypothetical changes in portfolio value are
based on daily percentage changes observed in key market indices
or other market factors (?market risk factors?) to which the
portfolio is sensitive. The one-day 99% confidence level of the
Partnership?s VaR corresponds to the negative change in portfolio
value that, based on observed market risk factors, would have
been exceeded once in 100 trading days, or one day in 100. VaR
<page> typically does not represent the worst case outcome.
Demeter uses approximately four years of daily market data (1,000
observations) and re-values its portfolio (using delta-gamma
approximations) for each of the historical market moves that
occurred over this time period. This generates a probability
distribution of daily ?simulated profit and loss? outcomes. The
VaR is the appropriate percentile of this distribution. For
example, the 99% one-day VaR would represent the 10th worst
outcome from Demeter?s simulated profit and loss series.

The Partnership?s VaR computations are based on the risk
representation of the underlying benchmark for each instrument or
contract and do not distinguish between exchange and non-exchange
dealer-based instruments. They are also not based on exchange
and/or dealer-based maintenance margin requirements.

VaR models, including the Partnership?s, are continually evolving
as trading portfolios become more diverse and modeling techniques
and systems capabilities improve. Please note that the VaR model
is used to numerically quantify market risk for historic
reporting purposes only and is not utilized by either Demeter or
the Trading Advisors in their daily risk management activities.
Please further note that VaR as described above may not be
comparable to similarly-titled measures used by other entities.

The Partnership?s Value at Risk in Different Market Sectors
<page> The following table indicates the VaR associated with the
Partnership?s open positions as a percentage of total Net Assets
by primary market risk category at September 30, 2006 and 2005.
At September 30, 2006 and 2005, the Partnership?s total
capitalization was approximately $164 million and $224 million,
respectively.

Primary Market September 30, 2006 September 30, 2005
Risk Category Value at Risk Value at Risk
Currency (2.93)% (2.68)%

The VaR for a market category represents the one-day downside
risk for the aggregate exposures associated with this market
category. Because the business of the Partnership is the
speculative trading of futures, forwards, and options, the
composition of its trading portfolio can change significantly
over any given time period, or even within a single trading day.
Such changes could positively or negatively materially impact
market risk as measured by VaR.

The table below supplements the quarter-end VaR set forth above
by presenting the Partnership?s high, low, and average VaR, as a
percentage of total Net Assets for the four quarter-end reporting
periods from October 1, 2005 through September 30, 2006.

Primary Market Risk Category High Low Average
Currency (2.93)% (1.40)% (2.13)%
<page>
Limitations on Value at Risk as an Assessment of Market Risk
VaR models permit estimation of a portfolio?s aggregate market
risk exposure, incorporating a range of varied market risks,
reflect risk reduction due to portfolio diversification or
hedging activities, and can cover a wide range of portfolio
assets. However, VaR risk measures should be viewed in light of
the methodology?s limitations, which include, but may not be
limited to the following:
* past changes in market risk factors will not always result in
accurate predictions of the distributions and correlations of
future market movements;
* changes in portfolio value caused by market movements may
differ from those of the VaR model;
* VaR results reflect past market fluctuations applied to current
trading positions while future risk depends on future
positions;
* VaR using a one-day time horizon does not fully capture the
market risk of positions that cannot be liquidated or hedged
within one day; and
* the historical market risk factor data used for VaR estimation
may provide only limited insight into losses that could be
incurred under certain unusual market movements.

<page> In addition, the VaR tables above, as well as the past
performance of the Partnership, give no indication of the
Partnership?s potential ?risk of ruin?.

The VaR tables provided present the results of the Partnership?s
VaR for its market risk exposure at September 30, 2005, and for
the four quarter-end reporting periods from October 1, 2005
through September 30, 2006. VaR is not necessarily
representative of the Partnership?s historic risk, nor should it
be used to predict the Partnership?s future financial performance
or its ability to manage or monitor risk. There can be no
assurance that the Partnership?s actual losses on a particular
day will not exceed the VaR amounts indicated above or that such
losses will not occur more than once in 100 trading days.

Non-Trading Risk
The Partnership has non-trading market risk on its foreign cash
balances. The Partnership did not have any foreign currency
balances at September 30, 2006.

The Partnership also maintains a substantial portion of its
available assets in cash at Morgan Stanley DW; as of September
30, 2006, such amount is equal to approximately 103% of the
Partnership?s net asset value. A decline in short-term interest
rates would result in a decline in the Partnership?s cash
<page> management income. This cash flow risk is not considered
to be material.

Materiality, as used throughout this section, is based on an
assessment of reasonably possible market movements and any
associated potential losses, taking into account the leverage,
optionality, and multiplier features of the Partnership?s market-
sensitive instruments, in relation to the Partnership?s Net
Assets.

Qualitative Disclosures Regarding Primary Trading Risk Exposures
The following qualitative disclosures regarding the Partnership?s
market risk exposures ? except for (A) those disclosures that are
statements of historical fact and (B) the descriptions of how the
Partnership manages its primary market risk exposures ?
constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of
Section 27A of the Securities Act and Section 21E of the
Securities Exchange Act. The Partnership?s primary market risk
exposures, as well as the strategies used and to be used by
Demeter and the Trading Advisors for managing such exposures, are
subject to numerous uncertainties, contingencies and risks, any
one of which could cause the actual results of the Partnership?s
risk controls to differ materially from the objectives of such
strategies. Government interventions, defaults and expropria-
tions, illiquid markets, the emergence of dominant fundamental
factors, political upheavals, changes in historical price <page>
relationships, an influx of new market participants, increased
regulation, and many other factors could result in material
losses, as well as in material changes to the risk exposures and
the risk management strategies of the Partnership. Investors
must be prepared to lose all or substantially all of their
investment in the Partnership.

The following was the only trading risk exposure of the
Partnership at September 30, 2006. It may be anticipated,
however, that market exposure will vary materially over time.

Currency. The Partnership?s currency market exposure at
September 30, 2006 was to exchange rate fluctuations, primarily
fluctuations which disrupt the historical pricing relationships
between different currencies and currency pairs. Interest rate
changes, as well as political and general economic conditions
influence these fluctuations. At September 30, 2006, the
Partnership?s exposure was to outright U.S. dollar positions.
Outright positions consist of the U.S. dollar vs. other
currencies. These other currencies include major and minor
currencies. Demeter does not anticipate that the risk associated
with the Partnership?s currency trades will change significantly
in the future.

Qualitative Disclosures Regarding Non-Trading Risk Exposure
<page> At September 30, 2006, there was no non-trading risk
exposure because the Partnership did not have any foreign
currency balances.

Qualitative Disclosures Regarding Means of Managing Risk Exposure
The Partnership and the Trading Advisors, separately, attempt to
manage the risk of the Partnership?s open positions in
essentially the same manner in all market categories traded.
Demeter attempts to manage market exposure by diversifying the
Partnership?s assets among different Trading Advisors in a multi-
advisor Partnership, each of whose strategies focus on different
trading approaches, and by monitoring the performance of the
Trading Advisors daily. In addition, the Trading Advisors
establish diversification guidelines, often set in terms of the
maximum margin to be committed to positions in any one market
sector or market-sensitive instrument.

Demeter monitors and controls the risk of the Partnership?s non-
trading instrument, cash. Cash is the only Partnership
investment directed by Demeter, rather than the Trading Advisors.

Item 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
(a) As of the end of the period covered by this quarterly
report, the President and Chief Financial Officer of
Demeter, the general partner of the Partnership, have
evaluated the effectiveness of the Partnership?s disclosure
<page> controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a?
15(e) and 15d?15(e) of the Exchange Act), and have judged
such controls and procedures to be effective.

(b) There have been no material changes during the period
covered by this quarterly report in the Partnership?s
internal control over financial reporting (as defined in
Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) of the Exchange Act) or in
other factors that could significantly affect these controls
subsequent to the date of their evaluation.
<page> PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1A. RISK FACTORS
There have been no material changes from the risk factors
previously referenced in the Partnership?s Report on Form 10-K for
the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005 and the Partnership?s
Reports on Form 10-Q for the quarters ended March 31, 2006 and
June 30, 2006.
<table>
Item 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF
PROCEEDS
<caption> SEC
Registration Statement on Form S-1 Units Registered Effective Date File Number
<s> <c> <c> <c>
Initial Registration 12,000,000.000 March 6, 2000 333-90485
Additional Registration 1,000,000.000 April 30, 2002 333-84654
Additional Registration 14,000,000.000 April 28, 2003 333-104004
Additional Registration 25,000,000.000 April 28, 2004 333-113398
Total Units Registered 52,000,000.000

Units sold through 9/30/06 26,933,824.577
Units unsold through 9/30/06 25,066,175.423

</table>
The managing underwriter for the Partnership is Morgan Stanley DW.

Units are continuously sold at monthly closings at a purchase
price equal to 100% of the net asset value per Unit as of the
close of business on the last day of each month.

The aggregate price of the Units sold through September 30, 2006
was $351,631,347.

<page> Since no expenses are chargeable against proceeds, 100% of
the proceeds of the offering have been applied to the working
capital of the Partnership for use in accordance with the ?Use of
Proceeds? section of the prospectus included as part of the above
referenced Registration Statements.

Item 5. OTHER INFORMATION
Management. On September 22, 2006, the following individual was
elected as a Director of Demeter. Jacques Chappuis, age 37, is a
Director of Demeter, and will be a principal of Demeter, pending
approval by and registration with the National Futures
Association. Mr. Chappuis is a Managing Director of Morgan
Stanley and Head of Alternative Investments for the Global Wealth
Management Group. Prior to joining Morgan Stanley in 2006, Mr.
Chappuis was Head of Alternative Investments for Citigroup?s
Global Wealth Management Group and prior to that a Managing
Director at Citigroup Alternative Investments. Before joining
Citigroup, Mr. Chappuis was a consultant at the Boston Consulting
Group, where he focused on the financial services sector, and a
corporate finance Associate at Bankers Trust Company. Mr.
Chappuis received a B.A. degree in finance from Tulane University
in 1991 and an MBA in finance, with honors, from the Columbia
University Graduate School of Business in 1998.

<page> On November 6, 2006, Mr. Kevin Perry resigned his position
as Chief Financial Officer of Demeter effective November 7, 2006.

On November 7, 2006, the Board of Directors of Demeter appointed
Mr. Lee Horwitz as the Chief Financial Officer of Demeter. Lee
Horwitz, age 55, is the Chief Financial Officer of Demeter, and
will be a principal of Demeter, pending approval by and
registration with the National Futures Association. Mr. Horwitz
currently serves as an Executive Director and Controller within
the Global Wealth Management Group at Morgan Stanley. Mr.
Horwitz joined Morgan Stanley in March 1984 and has held a
variety of positions throughout Morgan Stanley?s organization
during his tenure. Mr. Horwitz received a B.A. degree from
Queens College and an MBA from Rutgers University. Mr. Horwitz
is a Certified Public Accountant.

Item 6. EXHIBITS
31.01 Certification of President of Demeter Management
Corporation, the general partner of the Partnership,
pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002.
31.02 Certification of Chief Financial Officer of Demeter
Management Corporation, the general partner of the
Partnership, pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-
Oxley Act of 2002.
32.01 Certification of President of Demeter Management
Corporation, the general partner of the Partnership,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

<page>
32.02 Certification of Chief Financial Officer of Demeter
Management Corporation, the general partner of the
Partnership, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002.

<page>

SIGNATURE

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on
its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

Morgan Stanley Spectrum Currency L.P.
(Registrant)

By: Demeter Management Corporation
(General Partner)

November 14, 2006 By:/s/ Lee Horwitz
Lee Horwitz
Chief Financial Officer

The General Partner which signed the above is the only party
authorized to act for the Registrant. The Registrant has no
principal executive officer, principal financial officer,
controller, or principal accounting officer and has no Board of
Directors.

- 7 -
- 10 -

MORGAN STANLEY SPECTRUM CURRENCY L.P.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONCLUDED)

? 10 ?

</TEXT>
</DOCUMENT>