From: Tim Adelphia [tekelley@adelphia.net] Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2003 3:43 PM To: rule-comments@sec.gov Subject: S7-23-03 The proposed SHO regulations do not go far enough unless they include the OTCC bb stocks in the "pink" and "gray" markets. My money is as green as anyone else's and I have lost much of it due to "naked shorting" in these markets in particular. The regulations do not appear to address the enforcement of trade settlements and the closing of loopholes that allow market makers and brokers to ignore requirements and fail to deliver. I have asked the NY Attorney Generals office to investigate naked shorting of several stocks in particular. When met with initial resistance I asked the following. If you went out and bought a car for $15000 dollars and the dealer promised to get you the certificate of title within 7 days but could not deliver because he never owned the car... he would be arrested correct? This happens to thousands of small investors every day and NOBODY cares! I keep being told that this low end market is the wild west and buyer beware. I agree to a point and that point is the out and out fraud of selling something that does not even exist! There appears to still be some doubt in the minds of the SEC as to whether or not naked shorting even exists so let me make a suggestion. Pick one stock from the list of 120 companies complaining and identify all the shareholders and share count and tell the DTC to start issuing certs until they run out. This is what these companies tried and the SEC stepped in and shut down the process. In summary I believe the SHO regulation should include all markets and should provide for the enforcement of trade settlements with serious penalties. The number of shareholders being defrauded is staggering ,over 30,000 on PCBM(one of the 120 companies) alone. Thank you for the forum and please do the right thing and help the hundreds of thousands of small investors who have been begging for help for the last 10 years. Tim Kelley