Breadcrumb

Eric McPhail, et al.


U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Litigation Release No. 23040 / July 11, 2014

Securities and Exchange Commission v. Eric McPhail, et al., Civil Action No. 1:14-cv-12958 (District of Massachusetts, Complaint filed July 11, 2014)

SEC Charges Group of Amateur Golfers in Insider Trading Ring

The Securities and Exchange Commission today charged a group of friends, most of them golfing buddies, who made more than $554,000 of illegal profits from trading on inside information about Massachusetts-based American Superconductor Corporation.

In a complaint filed in federal court in Boston, the SEC alleges that Eric McPhail repeatedly provided non-public information about American Superconductor to six others, most fellow competitive amateur golfers. McPhail's source was an American Superconductor executive who belonged to the same country club as McPhail and was a close friend. According to the complaint, from July 2009 through April 2011, the executive told McPhail about American Superconducter's expected earnings, contracts, and other major pending corporate developments, trusting that McPhail would keep the information confidential.

Instead, according to the SEC's complaint, McPhail, of Waltham, Massachusetts, misappropriated the inside information about the energy technology company and fed it to his friends, often via email. The insider-trading ring included a handful of golfing buddies, four of whom live in Massachusetts: Douglas A. Parigian of Lowell, John J. Gilmartin of Andover, Douglas Clapp of Walpole, and James A. ("Andy") Drohen of Granville. The fifth, Drohen's brother, John C. Drohen, is a resident of Cranston, Rhode Island. In addition to the group of golfers, McPhail tipped a sixth man, his longtime friend Jamie A. Meadows, of Springfield, Massachusetts. Each of the six traded and profited on the inside information McPhail supplied to them.

According to the SEC's complaint, in April 2011, McPhail tipped Parigian and Meadows a few days before American Superconductor announced that it expected its fourth quarter and fiscal year-end financial results to be weaker than expected due to a deteriorating relationship with its primary customer, China-based Sinovel Wind Group Co., Ltd. Parigian and Meadows used the information to place bets, through option contracts, that the company's stock price would decline. When American Superconductor made the announcement on April 5, 2011, its stock price fell 42 percent and as a result of this one tip alone, Parigian made profits and avoided losses of $278,289, while Meadows made profits of $191,521.

The SEC further alleges that McPhail tipped the various defendants on other occasions, funneling them inside information about American Superconductor's quarterly earnings announcements in July and September 2009, and again in January 2010. He also alerted them in the fall of 2009 to a contract worth $100 million, and in November 2010 to a likely drop in American Superconductor's share's price, which occurred a few days later when AMSC announced a secondary stock offering.

The complaint charges that McPhail, Parigian, Gilmartin, Clapp, the Drohens, and Meadows violated Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5 thereunder, and seeks to have them be enjoined, disgorge their allegedly ill-gotten gains with interest, and pay civil penalties of up to three times their gains. Gilmartin, Clapp, and the Drohens agreed to settle the SEC's charges, without admitting or denying the allegations, by consenting to the entry of judgments permanently enjoining them from violating Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5 thereunder. The judgments also order:

  • Gilmartin to disgorge $23,713 in trading profits plus prejudgment interest of $4,034 and a civil penalty of $23,713, for a total of $51,460
  • Clapp to disgorge $11,848 in trading profits plus prejudgment interest of $1,767 and a civil penalty of $11,848, for a total of $25,463
  • Andy Drohen to disgorge $22,543 in trading profits plus prejudgment interest of $3,845 and a civil penalty of $22,543, for a total of $48,931
  • John Drohen to disgorge $8,972 in trading profits plus prejudgment interest of $1,511 and a civil penalty of $8,972, for a total of $19,455

The SEC's investigation was conducted by Asita Obeyesekere and Kevin Kelcourse of its Boston Regional Office and by Mike Foster of its Chicago Regional Office, who will lead the SEC's litigation of this matter.

The SEC would like to thank the U.S. Attorney's Office for the District of Massachusetts and the Boston Field Office of the Federal Bureau of Investigation for their cooperation and assistance with this matter. The SEC also thanks the Options Regulatory Surveillance Authority and the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority for their assistance.

SEC Complaint

 

Last Reviewed or Updated: June 27, 2023

Resources