Form 8-K

Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions:

On May 27, 2011, HQ Sustainable Maritime Industries, Inc. (the “Company”) received an additional deficiency letter from the NYSE Amex LLC (the “Exchange”) due to the Company’s inability to timely file its Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2011 (the “Quarterly Report”). Sections 134 and 1101 of the Exchange Company Guide (the “Company Guide”) require timely filing of such periodic reports with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The staff of the Exchange (the “Staff”) cited the Company’s failure to file its Quarterly Report within the prescribed filing deadline in its determination that the Company has failed to comply with certain continued listing standards of the Exchange.

As previously reported, the Company remains out of compliance with continued listing standards set forth under Sections 134 and 1101 of the Company Guide since the Company is yet to file its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010. In addition, on April 11, 2011, the Company was notified of non-compliance with continued listing standards set forth under Sections 802(a) and 803(B)(2)(a) of the Company Guide. The foregoing Sections require a listed company to maintain a majority of independent directors on its Board of Directors and at least three independent directors on the Company’s Audit Committee. The trading in the Company’s securities remains halted.

The Company submitted to the Staff a plan of compliance in connection with the continued listing deficiencies. If the Company’s plan to regain compliance is accepted by the Exchange, the Company may be able to continue its listing during this period, during which time it will be subject to periodic review to determine progress consistent with the plan. If, however, the plan is not accepted by the Exchange, the Company will be subject to delisting procedures as set forth in the Company Guide. Under Company Guide rules, the Company has the right to appeal the determination by the Exchange staff to initiate delisting proceedings. There is no assurance that the Exchange staff will accept the Company’s plan of compliance or that, even if such plan is accepted, the Company will be able to implement the plan within the prescribed timeframe.

On May 26, 2011, the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company received a written notice from the Company’s auditing firm of Schwartz Levitsky Feldman LLP (“SLF”) that the client-auditor relationship between the Company and SLF has ceased. The written correspondence contained no further information and is attached hereto as Exhibit 99.3.

As described in detail below, the audit of the Company’s consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010 has not been completed and, therefore, SLF did not provide its report in connection with such financial statements for the subject period. In addition, the preparation and review of the interim financial statements for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2011 are also yet to be completed. The SLF reports on the Company’s financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009 and subsequent interim periods did not contain an adverse opinion or a disclaimer of opinion and were not qualified or modified as to uncertainty, audit scope or accounting principles. Similarly, during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009 and the subsequent interim periods, the Company had no disagreements with SLF on any matter of accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure, or auditing scope or procedure which, if not resolved to the satisfaction of SLF, would have caused SLF to make reference to the matter in its report, except as follows:

During the course of the audit work relating to the Company’s consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010, the Company learned that SLF was not licensed to provide auditing services for the Company and its PRC subsidiaries in the People’s Republic of China (the “PRC”). This information came to the Company’s attention when SLF insisted upon application of certain heightened, more stringent procedures than those utilized by SLF in prior audits of the Company’s financial statements. Specifically, those procedures related to confirmation and verification procedures that involved the collection of information directly from the sources of such information, such as vendors, customers and financial institutions in connection with the 2010 audit work. SLF’s attempt to implement these new direct collection procedures raised the issue of SLF’s lack of PRC licensing since such licensing is a legal pre-requisite for direct collection of information in connection with an audit in the PRC.

The Company also learned that the PRC Ministry of Finance has reconfirmed its policies regarding the performance of fieldwork by foreign auditing firms auditing the financial statements of companies with operations in the PRC. The PRC rules and regulations governing licensing matters require, among other things, that foreign accounting firms obtain administrative permits to conduct auditing services in the PRC, comply with PRC laws regulating the confidentiality and secrecy of information, and keep audit working papers within the PRC. Violators of the foregoing requirements could be subject to legal sanctions in the PRC, ranging from fines and suspension of business licenses to criminal prosecution. Notwithstanding repeated inquiries by the Company, SLF neither confirmed nor denied that it was not properly licensed to provide auditing services in the PRC.

As an alternative to SLF’s more stringent confirmation procedures and a safeguard against violating applicable PRC rules and regulations, the Company proposed that SLF and the Company employ certain “chain of custody” procedures in the confirmation and verification procedures to be utilized in the audit, which the Company believed would satisfy Generally Accepted Auditing Standards. Those proposed procedures involved the proposed collection of the requisite information by the Company in the presence of SLF. Notwithstanding SLF’s initial agreement to utilize such procedures, SLF subsequently and without explanation elected not to utilize this alternative and reverted to its demand to utilize the more stringent confirmation procedures. Thereafter in early May 2011, SLF requested that the Company (and its subsidiaries’) provide certain written representations to be submitted by SLF to the PRC Ministry of Finance in connection with an application SLF intended to make for a Temporary Practice Permit for Offshore Accounting Firm in accordance with the PRC Ministry of Finance’s Interim Provisions on Temporary Auditing Business Activities Carried Out in China Mainland by Offshore Accounting Firms. The Company and SLF apparently have conflicting understandings of those regulations. The Company believes that the subject legal scheme precludes SLF from obtaining such a temporary permit by virtue of SLF’s prior activities in the PRC, and the Company has continued to press SLF to utilize alternative procedures. SLF disagreed with the Company’s view of that regulatory scheme. If the Company’s assessment is correct, the written support that SLF requested that the Company (and its subsidiaries) provided could have subjected the Company to administrative sanctions in the event that the PRC authorities determined that SLF engaged in unpermitted auditing business activities in Hainan Province. The Company, therefore, declined to provide the written authorizations sought by SLF. Subsequently on May 26, 2011, SLF tendered its resignation letter filed as an exhibit to this Current Report.

The Audit Committee of the Board of Directors discussed the foregoing matters with SLF on a number of occasions. On April 11, 2011, the Company filed a Current Report on Form 8-K, disclosing Chairman of the Audit Committee’s resignation from the Audit Committee and the Board at large. Mr. Intrater’s resignation letter cited differences and disagreements with management as the basis for his resignation. A copy of that letter was filed as exhibit to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 11, 2011.

On May 25, 2011 a representative of SLF placed a telephone call to Mr. Fred Bild, a member of the Company’s Audit Committee, and informed him that SLF would resign because of its inability to proceed due to the lack of support from management in SLF efforts to complete the audit.

As of the date hereof, the Company has not engaged a registered independent public accounting firm to succeed SLF and to audit its 2010 financial statements. When the Company does engage a new firm, however, the Company intends to authorize SLF to respond fully to the inquiries of the successor accounting firm concerning the foregoing matters.

In addition, except as set forth elsewhere in this filing, during SLF’s engagement with the Company and in the subsequent interim periods through its resignation, SLF did not advise the Company:

In accordance with Item 304(a)(3) of Regulation S-K, a copy of the draft of this Current Report on Form 8-K has been provided to SLF with a request that SLF furnish the Company a letter addressed to the Securities and Exchange Commission stating whether or not it agrees with the above statements. No such letter has been provided to the Company as of the filing date of this Current Report. However, SLF provided a letter addressed to the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors in which SLF stated, among other things, that “… the draft Form 8-K does not accurately set forth the reasons for the resignation of Schwartz Levitsky Feldman LLP…” In addition, SLF, in the same letter to the Audit Committee stated, among other things, that “…SLF’s resignation was the result of culmination of several factors which lead SLF to conclude that it could no longer rely upon representations of HQ’s management and, thus, lead SLF to decide to resign as HQ’s auditors.” A true copy of SLF’s letter to the Audit Committee is filed as Exhibit 99.2 to this Current Report. Any references to such letter are qualified in their entirety by the text of the letter. All readers of this Current Report are encouraged to read the entire text of such letter. In addition, on a call between the Company’s and SLF’s counsel, SLF’s counsel cited several factors for SLF’s resignation, including, among other things, difficulties in confirming receivable balances in the PRC, the Company’s management’s resistance to SLF’s suggestions, lack of cooperation and promptness by the Company’s management in connection with SLF’s request relating to its temporary licensing application in the PRC, lack of promptness in sharing of the information with SLF relating to the Company’s submissions to the NYSE Amex, and SLF’s understanding that, contrary to the Company’s representations to the NYSE Amex, the Audit Committee and the Board of Directors authorized engagement of independent counsel to investigate circumstances leading to the Company’s inability to complete the 2010 audit and file its Annual Report within the prescribed timeframe.

The Company is in the process of searching for a new independent registered auditing firm. The Company will provide details of such engagement upon completion of the engagement process.

On June 2, 2011, the Company issued a press release announcing the receipt of the additional deficiency letter from the Exchange. A copy of the press release is attached to this Current Report on Form 8-K as Exhibit 99.1 and the information therein is incorporated herein by reference.

The information reported under Item 7.01 in this Current Report on Form 8-K, including Exhibit 99.1 attached hereto, shall not be deemed filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”) or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that section, nor shall it be deemed incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, hereunto duly authorized.


HQ Sustainable Maritime Industries, Inc.

By:		/s/ Norbert Sporns
		Norbert Sporns Chief Executive Officer


Exhibit No.		Description

99.1		Press release dated June 2, 2011

99.2		Letter from Schwartz Levitsky Feldman LLP

99.3		Termination letter from Schwartz Levitsky Feldman LLP