Uranium Resources, Inc. Schedule 14A

NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the 2017 Annual Meeting of the Stockholders of Uranium Resources, Inc. will be held on Tuesday, July 18, 2017 at 9:00 a.m., local time, at our corporate headquarters, located at 6950 South Potomac Street, Suite 300, Centennial, Colorado 80112, for the following purposes:

Ratify the appointment of Hein & Associates LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for 2017.

Hold an advisory vote on the frequency of future advisory votes on our executive compensation.

Approve an amendment to the Uranium Resources, Inc. 2013 Omnibus Incentive Plan to increase the authorized number of shares of common stock available and reserved for issuance under such plan by one million shares, and to re-approve the material terms of the performance goals under such plan.

Transact such other business as may properly come before the Annual Meeting of Stockholders.

The Board of Directors has fixed the close of business on Monday, May 22, 2017 as the record date for determining the stockholders entitled to notice of and to vote at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders or at any adjournment or postponement thereof.

Stockholders are cordially invited to attend the meeting in person. Whether or not you plan to be present at the meeting, you are requested to sign and return the enclosed proxy in the enclosed envelope so that your shares may be voted in accordance with your wishes and in order that the presence of a quorum may be assured. The giving of such proxy will not affect your right to vote in person, should you later decide to attend the meeting. Please date and sign the enclosed proxy and return it promptly in the enclosed envelope. Your vote is important.

We are providing below highlights of certain information in this Proxy Statement. As it is only a summary, please refer to the complete Proxy Statement and 2016 Annual Report before you vote.

During 2016, all Board Committees (except the Health, Safety, Environment and Public Affairs Committee) were composed exclusively of independent directors.

The independent directors regularly meet in executive sessions without management.

Our CEO and CFO are expected to obtain common stock valued at three times base salary.

Our compensation program provides total direct compensation to our named executive officers, or NEOs, that supports our philosophy of pay-for-performance and alignment of incentives between our management and stockholders. To that end, we have implemented the following policies and practices:

Significant “At-Risk” Compensation. A significant portion of NEO compensation and bonus opportunities are based on their performance and the performance of the Company.

Short-Term Incentive Compensation. The short-term incentive compensation component of our compensation program includes an annual incentive payment, payable in cash or stock, upon the achievement of specific planned performance goals. Such incentive payment serves as a vehicle for recruitment and retention and allows us to deliver competitive compensation tied to performance.

Long-Term Incentive Compensation. The long-term incentive compensation component of our compensation program includes restricted stock units (“RSUs”) tied to both performance and length of service. The award of such RSUs further aligns our management’s interests with our long-term performance and stockholder value.

No Perquisites. We do not provide any perquisites, whether cash or otherwise, to our CEO, CFO or other NEOs.

It is anticipated that Mr. Pagliara will join each of the Audit Committee, Compensation Committee, and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee immediately following the 2017 Annual Meeting.

Uranium Resources, Inc.

6950 S. Potomac Street, Suite 300

Centennial, Colorado 80112

This Proxy Statement is furnished in connection with the solicitation of proxies by Uranium Resources, Inc. (the “Company” or “URI”) on behalf of the Board of Directors of the Company for the 2017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the “2017 Annual Meeting”). The Company is making this Proxy Statement and the accompanying proxy first available on or about May 23, 2017.

The 2017 Annual Meeting will be held on Tuesday, July 18, 2017 at 9:00 a.m., local time, at our corporate headquarters, located at 6950 South Potomac Street, Suite 300, Centennial, Colorado 80112.

At the 2017 Annual Meeting, stockholders will vote on the following matters, as well as any other business properly brought before the meeting:

Proposal No. 1: Elect as directors the four nominees named in this Proxy Statement. The Board recommends a vote FOR each of the nominees.

Proposal No. 2: Ratify the appointment of Hein & Associates LLP as our independent registered public accountants for 2017. The Board recommends a vote FOR this proposal.

Proposal No. 3: Provide advisory approval of the compensation of our named executive officers. The Board recommends a vote FOR this proposal.

Proposal No. 4: Hold an advisory vote on the frequency of future advisory votes on our executive compensation. The Board recommends future advisory votes on our executive compensation every ONE YEAR.

Proposal No. 5: Approve an amendment to the Uranium Resources, Inc. 2013 Omnibus Incentive Plan to increase the authorized number of shares of common stock available and reserved for issuance under such plan by one million shares, and re-approve the material terms of the performance goals under such plan. The Board recommends a vote FOR this proposal.

Holders of record of URI common stock at the close of business on May 22, 2017, the record date, or their duly authorized proxy holders, are entitled to vote on each matter submitted to a vote at the 2017 Annual Meeting and at any adjournment or postponement thereof. At the close of business on the record date, there were 24,709,673 shares of URI common stock outstanding and entitled to one vote per share each at the 2017 Annual Meeting. Cumulative voting is not permitted.

If you are a stockholder of record (that is, if your shares are registered in your own name with our transfer agent), you can vote any one of four ways:

Via the Internet. You may vote via the Internet by following the instructions on the proxy card. You will be asked to provide the company number and control number from the enclosed proxy card.

By Telephone. You may vote by proxy by calling the toll-free number found on the proxy card.

By Mail. You may vote by proxy by filling out the proxy card and sending it back in the envelope provided.

If you are a beneficial owner of shares held in “street name” (that is, if you hold your shares through a broker, bank or other holder of record), you can vote in one of four ways:

Via the Internet. You may vote via the Internet by following the instructions on the voting instruction form accompanying the proxy materials.

By Telephone. You may vote by proxy by calling the toll-free number found on the voting instruction form.

By Mail. You may vote by proxy by filling out the voting instruction form and sending it back in the envelope provided.

In Person. You must obtain a legal proxy from the organization that holds your shares if you wish to attend the 2017 Annual Meeting and vote in person.

As the beneficial owner of shares held in street name, you have the right to direct your bank or broker regarding how to vote your shares, and your bank or broker is required to vote your shares in accordance with your instructions. If you do not give instructions to your bank or broker, it will nevertheless be entitled to vote your shares with respect to “routine” items, but it will not be permitted to vote your shares with respect to “non-routine” items. In the case of a non-routine item, your shares will be considered “broker non-votes” on that proposal. Proposal No. 2 (ratification of the appointment of the independent registered public accountants) is a matter that we believe will be designated “routine.” Proposal No. 1 (election of directors), Proposal No. 3 (advisory approval of the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers), Proposal No. 4 (advisory vote on the frequency of future advisory votes on the Company’s executive compensation) and Proposal No. 5 (approval of an amendment to the 2013 Omnibus Incentive Plan) are matters the Company believes will be considered “non-routine.”

You may revoke your proxy and change your vote before the 2017 Annual Meeting by voting again via the Internet or by telephone, by completing, signing, dating and returning a new proxy card or voting instruction form with a later date, or by attending the 2017 Annual Meeting and voting in person. Only your latest dated proxy we receive prior to the 2017 Annual Meeting will be counted. However, your attendance at the 2017 Annual Meeting will not automatically revoke your proxy unless you vote again at the 2017 Annual Meeting or specifically request that your prior proxy be revoked by delivering to the Company’s Secretary at 6950 S. Potomac Street, Suite 300, Centennial, Colorado 80112, a written notice of revocation prior to the 2017 Annual Meeting.

The presence in person or by proxy of the holders of one third of the votes entitled to be cast on a matter constitutes a quorum for action on that matter. Votes “for” and “against” or “withhold,” and “abstentions” and “broker non-votes” will all be counted as present to determine whether a quorum has been established. Once a share of the Company’s common stock is represented for any purpose at the 2017 Annual Meeting, it is deemed present for quorum purposes for the remainder of the Annual Meeting and any adjournments of the Annual Meeting unless a new record date is or must be set for the adjourned meeting. If a quorum is not present, the holders of record of a majority of such shares present and entitled to vote may adjourn the 2017 Annual Meeting until a quorum is obtained.

Election of Directors. For Proposal No. 1, the Company’s directors are elected by a plurality, and the four nominees for director who receive the most FOR votes at the 2017 Annual Meeting in person or by proxy will be elected to the Board of Directors. Abstentions, “broker non-votes” and shares that are voted “withhold” in regards to a director nominee will not be counted toward such nominee’s election and will have no effect on the outcome of the election.

Ratification of Independent Registered Public Accountants. For Proposal No. 2, the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast on the proposal at the 2017 Annual Meeting in person or by proxy is required to ratify the appointment of the independent registered public accountants. Abstentions and “broker non-votes” are not treated as cast either for or against the proposal, and therefore will not affect the outcome of the vote.

Advisory Approval of the Compensation of Our Named Executive Officers. For Proposal No. 3, the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast on the proposal at the 2017 Annual Meeting in person or by proxy is required to approve, by non-binding vote, the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers. Abstentions and “broker non-votes” are not treated as cast either for or against the proposal, and therefore will not affect the outcome of the vote.

Advisory Approval of the Frequency for Future Advisory Votes on Our Executive Compensation. For Proposal No. 4, the alternative — that is, every one, two or three years — receiving the greatest number of votes will be the frequency that stockholders approve. Abstentions and “broker non-votes” will not affect the outcome of the vote.

Approval of an Amendment to the 2013 Omnibus Incentive Plan. For Proposal No. 5, the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast on the proposal at the 2017 Annual Meeting in person or by proxy is required to approve an amendment to the Uranium Resources, Inc. 2013 Omnibus Incentive Plan to increase the authorized number of shares of common stock available and reserved for issuance under such plan by one million shares, and to re-approve the material terms of the performance goals under such plan. Abstentions and “broker non-votes” are not treated as cast either for or against the proposal, and therefore will not affect the outcome of the vote.

Shares will be voted on each proposal as instructed in the accompanying proxy. However, if no instructions are given on a validly signed and returned proxy (other than with respect of “broker non-votes”), the shares will be voted in accordance with the Board’s recommendations as follows: (i) FOR the election of the four director nominees named in this Proxy Statement, (ii) FOR ratification of the appointment of Hein & Associates LLP as our independent registered public accountants for the year ending December 31, 2017, (iii) FOR advisory approval of the compensation of our named executive officers, (iv) every ONE YEAR for the frequency of future advisory votes on our executive compensation, and (v) FOR approval of the amendment to the 2013 Omnibus Incentive Plan.

Pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”), we are providing access to our proxy materials, which include our notice of annual meeting, this Proxy Statement and our 2016 Annual Report to Stockholders, over the Internet at http://uraniumresources.com. These proxy materials are available without charge.

Upon your written request, we will provide to you a complimentary copy of our 2016 Annual Report on Form 10-K (without exhibits) as filed with the SEC. The Company’s audited consolidated financial statements are included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K. Your request should be mailed to the Company’s offices, addressed as follows: Uranium Resources, Inc., Attention: Secretary, 6950 S. Potomac Street, Suite 300, Centennial, Colorado 80112. A free copy of the Form 10-K may also be obtained at the Internet web site maintained by the SEC at www.sec.gov or by visiting our Internet web site at http://uraniumresources.com.

Representatives from Computershare, the Company’s transfer agent, will serve as the inspectors of election.

The accompanying proxy is being solicited on behalf of the Board. All expenses for soliciting proxies for the Annual Meeting, including the expense of preparing, printing and mailing the form of proxy and the material used in the solicitation thereof, will be borne by the Company. In addition to the use of the mails, proxies may be solicited by personal interview, telephone, electronic mail and facsimile by directors, officers and regular employees of the Company. None of the Company’s directors, officers or employees will receive any additional compensation for soliciting proxies on behalf of the Board. We may also make arrangements with brokerage firms and other custodians,

nominees and fiduciaries for the forwarding of soliciting material to the beneficial owners of common stock held of record by those owners. We will reimburse those brokers, custodians, nominees and fiduciaries for their reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred in connection with that service. We have engaged Regan & Associates, Inc. to assist us with the solicitation of proxies for the Annual Meeting. We expect to pay Regan & Associates, Inc. approximately $25,000 for its services.

Our Board of Directors has nominated four directors for election at the 2017 Annual Meeting. The directors will hold office from election until the next Annual Meeting of Stockholders and until their successors are elected and qualified or until their death, resignation or removal. All of the nominees are currently URI directors who were elected by the stockholders at the 2016 Annual Meeting, except for Tracy D. Pagliara, who is not currently serving as a URI director.

If your proxy is properly completed and received in time for the Annual Meeting, and if your proxy does not indicate otherwise, the represented shares will be voted FOR each of the directors presented below. We have no reason to believe that any of the nominees for director will be unable to serve if elected. However, if any of these nominees becomes unavailable, the persons named in the proxy intend to vote for any alternate designated by the current Board. Proxies cannot be voted for a greater number of persons than the nominees named.

In the paragraphs below, we describe each nominee’s individual management and leadership experience for at least the last five years, which we believe, in the aggregate, creates a well-rounded and capable Board of Directors and contributes to the overall effectiveness of our Board and each of its Committees. Each nominee is an incumbent director other than Mr. Pagliara. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee identified Mr. Pagliara as a director nominee based on recommendations from URI management and a former chairman of the Board of Directors. Each nominee consents to being named herein and to serve on the Board of Directors if elected. There are no family relationships among any director, executive officer or any person nominated or chosen by us to become a director.

Following each nominee’s biography below, we have highlighted certain notable skills and qualifications that contributed to his selection as a member of our Board of Directors.

Interim Chairman of the Board, Chairman of the Health, Safety, Environment and Public Affairs Committee

Christopher M. Jones has served as President and Chief Executive Officer and a director of the Company since April 2013 and was appointed as the interim Chairman of the Board in March 2016. Mr. Jones has more than 30 years’ experience in the mining industry and was most recently President, Chief Executive Officer and a director of Wildcat Silver Corporation from August 2008 to May 2012, where he and his team effectively sextupled the size of Wildcat Silver’s resources using proven metallurgical and exploration technologies. Prior to that, Mr. Jones was the Chief Operating Officer and the Mining General Manager at Albian Sands Energy from April 2004 to June 2008. Mr. Jones also held management positions at RAG Coal West Inc., Phelps Dodge Sierrita Corp. and Cyprus Amax Coal Company. He is a member of the National Association of Corporate Directors, the American Institute of Mining, Metallurgical, and Petroleum Engineers and is a Professional Engineer registered in Utah and Alberta. Mr. Jones received a Bachelor of Science degree in Mining Engineering from the South Dakota School of Mines and a Master of Business Administration degree from Colorado State University.

Mr. Jones has extensive executive and leadership experience as a result of his prior employment in management roles at other companies within the mining industry, which enables him to provide valuable counsel to the Company on issues of strategic planning and corporate governance. In addition, Mr. Jones has a history of leading various mining and production operations, as well as exploration and development projects, which will be useful to the Company in its efforts to develop its uranium and lithium assets.

Chairman of the Audit and the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committees and Member of the Compensation Committee

Marvin K. Kaiser has served as a director since July 2007 and is Chairman of the Audit Committee and Chairman of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. Since 2006, Mr. Kaiser has owned Whippoorwill Consulting LLC, a consulting practice specializing in the natural resource industry. In February 2006, Mr. Kaiser retired from The Doe Run Company, a privately held natural resources company and the largest integrated lead producer in the Western Hemisphere, where he served as Executive Vice President and Chief Administrative Officer. Prior to his thirteen years with Doe Run, Mr. Kaiser held the position of Chief Financial Officer for Amax Gold, Olympic Mining Corporation and Ranchers Exploration at various times over a 24-year period. Mr. Kaiser graduated from Southern Illinois University with a Bachelor of Science degree in Accounting in 1963. He is a Certified Public Accountant and is experienced in all aspects of corporate finance and management. Mr. Kaiser currently serves as a director of Aurania Resources Ltd. Mr. Kaiser previously served as a director of New West Gold Corporation from May 2006 through September 2007, Constellation Copper Corporation from August 2006 through December 2008, El Capitan Precious Metals Inc. from September 2007 through April 2009, Gryphon Gold Corporation from November 2008 to December 2013, and Brigus Gold Corp. (formerly named Apollo Gold Corporation) from May 2006 to March 2014.

Mr. Kaiser’s qualifications include over 40 years in the mining and exploration industries. In addition, Mr. Kaiser’s background in accounting and his prior experience serving on the audit committees of other public companies make him a valuable advisor to the Company on financial and accounting issues and uniquely qualify him to serve as the Company’s Audit Committee financial expert.

Member of the Audit, Nominating and Corporate Governance and Health, Safety, Environment and Public Affairs Committees

Patrick N. Burke has served as a director since March 2016. Mr. Burke serves as a director for ASX listed ATC Alloys Limited (formerly Hazelwood Resources Limited), Pan Pacific Petroleum NL, Triton Minerals Ltd and Bligh Resources Ltd., and has acted as a director for a number of ASX and AIM listed small to mid-cap resources companies over the past ten years. Mr. Burke previously served as a non-executive director of Anatolia Energy Limited, which the Company acquired in November 2015. Mr. Burke holds a Bachelor of Laws degree from the University of Western Australia and has extensive legal and corporate advisory experience developed over more than twenty-two years working in law firms, corporate advisory firms and with various companies.

Mr. Burke’s legal expertise in corporate, commercial and securities law and his fulsome experience as a director at other companies over the past decade enable him to provide counsel to the Company on strategic planning, corporate governance, potential capital raising and mergers and acquisitions.

Proposed member of the Audit, Compensation, and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committees

Tracy D. Pagliara serves as Senior Vice President, Chief Administrative Officer, General Counsel and Secretary of Global Power Equipment Group Inc., a publicly traded provider of engineered products and services to the power, energy and process industries. Prior to joining Global Power in April 2010, Mr. Pagliara served as the Chief Legal Officer of Gardner Denver, Inc., a leading global manufacturer of highly engineered compressors, blowers, pumps and other fluid transfer equipment, from August 2000 through August 2008. He also had responsibility for other roles during his tenure with Gardner Denver, including Vice President of Administration, Chief Compliance Officer, and Corporate Secretary.

Prior to joining Gardner Denver, Mr. Pagliara held positions of increasing responsibility in the legal departments of Verizon Communications/GTE Corporation from August 1996 to August 2000 and Kellwood Company from May 1993 to August 1996, ultimately serving in the role of Assistant General Counsel for each company. Mr. Pagliara has a B.S. in Accounting and a J.D. from the University of Illinois. He is a member of the Missouri and Illinois State Bars and a Certified Public Accountant.

Mr. Pagliara brings to the Board extensive experience advising public companies and companies in the energy industry, in addition to companies with similar capital needs to URI. Mr. Pagliara’s background in accounting will also permit him to contribute substantially as a member of the Audit Committee.

The following table shows, as of May 22, 2017, the number of shares of URI common stock beneficially owned by each current director and each nominee for director, by each of the named executive officers identified in the 2016 Summary Compensation Table on page 26, and by all current directors and executive officers as a group. The percentage of beneficial ownership is based on 24,709,673 shares of common stock outstanding as of the close of business on May 22, 2017. The information in this table is based solely on statements in filings with the SEC or other reliable information.

Includes the following shares that directors and executive officers have the right to acquire within 60 days after May 22, 2017 through the exercise of vested stock options: Christopher M. Jones, 2,546 shares; Marvin K. Kaiser, 1,390 shares; Tracy A. Stevenson, 313 shares; Patrick N. Burke 5,558 shares; and all current directors and executive officers as a group, 10,015 shares. Also includes the following shares that directors have the right to acquire within 60 days after May 22, 2017 through the vesting of RSUs: Marvin K. Kaiser, 556 shares and Tracy A. Stevenson, 556 shares. Except as otherwise noted, the directors, director nominees and executive officers exercise sole voting and investment power over their shares shown in the table and none of the shares are subject to pledge.

Mr. Stevenson is not standing for election to the Board of Directors at the 2017 Annual Meeting.

Section 16 of the Exchange Act, requires our directors and executive officers and persons who own more than 10% of our outstanding common stock to file reports of ownership and changes in ownership of our common stock. To our knowledge, based on a review of those forms and written representations, in 2016 all required forms were filed on time with the SEC, other than (i) a Form 4 filing that was filed one day late for Mr. Vigil on June 17, 2016 for a single transaction, (ii) Form 4 filings that were filed four days late for each of Messrs. Jones, Vigil and McCoig on November 17, 2016, each for two transactions, (iii) Form 4 filings that were filed 164 days late for each of Mr. Kaiser and Mr. Stevenson on November 17, 2016, each for a single transaction, and (iv) a Form 3 filing that was filed five days late for Mr. Burke on March 31, 2016 for a single transaction.

Our business and affairs are overseen by our Board of Directors pursuant to the Delaware General Corporation Law and our Amended and Restated Bylaws. Members of the Board of Directors are kept informed of the Company’s business through discussions with the Chairman and key members of management, by reviewing materials provided to them and by participating in Board and Committee meetings. All members of the Board of Directors are elected annually by the stockholders.

Regular attendance at Board meetings and the Annual Meeting is expected of each director. Our Board of Directors held seventeen meetings during 2016. No director attended fewer than 75% of the total number of Board and applicable Committee meetings (held during the period that such director served) in 2016. The independent directors met in executive session at several of the Board meetings held in 2016. All but one of the directors at the time attended the 2016 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.

The Company’s governing documents allow the roles of Chairman and Chief Executive Officer to be filled by the same or different individuals. This approach allows the Board flexibility to determine whether the two roles should be separate or combined based upon the Company’s needs and the Board’s assessment of the Company’s leadership from time to time. Currently, Mr. Jones serves as both Chief Executive Officer and interim Chairman. We believe combining the roles of Chairman and Chief Executive Officer on an interim basis is appropriate considering the current corporate agenda and the small size of the Board, which currently has only four members, allowing effective communications and governance without a separate Chairman.

The Board annually reviews all relationships that directors have with the Company to affirmatively determine whether the directors are “independent” under Nasdaq listing standards. The Board has determined that each of Messrs. Kaiser, Stevenson and Burke is “independent” and as a result, each member of the Audit Committee, Compensation Committee and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is “independent.” In addition, the Board has determined that Mr. Pagliara is “independent” under Nasdaq listing standards. In arriving at the foregoing independence determination, the Board of Directors considered transactions and relationships between each director or director nominee or any member of his immediate family and the Company, its subsidiaries or its affiliates. The Board has determined that the directors and director nominee designated as “independent” have no relationship with the Company that would interfere with the exercise of their independent judgment in carrying out the responsibilities of a director.

Under a stockholders’ agreement between Resource Capital Fund V L.P. (“RCF”) and the Company dated March 1, 2012, so long as RCF or its affiliates beneficially own more than five percent of our common stock, RCF has the right to designate one nominee to our Board of Directors. In December 2013, the Board appointed Tracy A. Stevenson to serve as a director pursuant to the stockholders’ agreement and similar agreements with RCF that have subsequently been terminated. Because RCF no longer beneficially owns more than five percent of our common stock, RCF currently does not have the right to designate a nominee to our Board of Directors.

Pursuant to the implementation agreement by which the Company acquired Anatolia Energy Limited, Mr. Burke was invited to join the Board following the closing of the transaction. Mr. Burke accepted this invitation effective March 16, 2016.

Interested parties, including our stockholders, desiring to communicate with our Board members, including our non-management directors as a group, may do so by mailing a request to the Secretary of Uranium Resources, Inc. at 6950 S. Potomac Street, Suite 300, Centennial, Colorado 80112. Pursuant to the instruction of the Company’s non-management directors, the Secretary will review inquiries and if they are relevant to, and consistent with our operations, policies and procedures, they will be forwarded to the director or directors to whom they are addressed. Inquiries not forwarded will be retained by the Company and will be made available to any director upon request.

The Board of Directors has established four standing Committees: an Audit Committee, a Compensation Committee, a Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and a Health, Safety, Environment and Public Affairs Committee. The table below indicates the members of each standing Board Committee. It is anticipated that Mr. Pagliara will join each of the Audit Committee, Compensation Committee, and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee immediately following the 2017 Annual Meeting.

It is anticipated that Mr. Burke will become Chairman of the Compensation Committee immediately following the 2017 Annual Meeting.

Mr. Stevenson is not standing for election to the Board of Directors at the 2017 Annual Meeting.

Each of our Audit Committee, Compensation Committee, and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee operates under a charter, adopted by the Board of Directors, which is available on our website at http://uraniumresources.com under “Corporate Governance,” or in print, without charge, to any stockholder who sends a request to the office of the Secretary of Uranium Resources, Inc. at 6950 S. Potomac Street, Suite 300, Centennial, Colorado 80112. The functions performed by each of the standing Committees are briefly described below.

The Audit Committee held four meetings in 2016. The Audit Committee’s primary responsibilities are to:

assist the Board of Directors in discharging its responsibilities with respect to the accounting policies, internal controls and financial reporting of the Company;

monitor compliance with applicable laws and regulations, standards and ethical business conduct, and the systems of internal controls;

assist the Board of Directors in its oversight of the qualifications, independence and performance of the registered public accounting firm engaged to be the independent auditor of the Company; and

prepare the Audit Committee report required to be included in the Company’s proxy statements.

The Board of Directors has determined that Mr. Kaiser, the chairman of the Audit Committee, satisfies the criteria adopted by the SEC to serve as an “audit committee financial expert.” In addition, the Board of Directors has determined that each of Messrs. Kaiser, Stevenson and Burke, constituting all current members of the Audit Committee, is an independent director pursuant to the requirements under the Exchange Act and Nasdaq listing standards and is able to read and understand the Company’s financial statements. Mr. Stevenson is not standing for election to the Board of Directors at the 2017 Annual Meeting, and it is anticipated that Mr. Pagliara will join the Audit Committee immediately following the 2017 Annual Meeting. The Board of Directors has determined that Mr. Pagliara is independent pursuant to the requirements under the Exchange Act and Nasdaq listing standards and is able to read and understand the Company’s financial statements.

The Compensation Committee held five meetings in 2016. The Compensation Committee is responsible for assisting the Board of Directors in setting the compensation of the Company’s directors and executive officers and administering and implementing the Company’s incentive compensation plans and equity based plans. The Compensation Committee’s duties and responsibilities are to:

review and approve corporate goals and objectives relevant to the compensation of the Company’s executive officers;

evaluate the performance of the Company’s executive officers in light of such goals and objectives; and

The Compensation Committee also reviews and discusses the Compensation Discussion and Analysis appearing in our proxy statements with our management, and based on such review and discussions, has recommended to the Board of Directors that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis set forth herein be included in this Proxy Statement.

Under our Compensation Committee Charter, the Compensation Committee has the authority to retain compensation consultants. In the past, the Compensation Committee engaged Buck Consultants, LLC to review and make recommendations regarding our executive compensation programs. Certain elements of our executive compensation programs have been developed based, in part, on the recommendations of Buck Consultants, LLC. See the discussion under the heading “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” for further information regarding the executive compensation programs. The Compensation Committee also has the authority to obtain advice and assistance from our executives, internal or external legal, accounting or other advisors as it determines necessary to carry out its duties.

The Compensation Committee may delegate its authority to determine the amount and form of compensation paid to the Company’s non-executive employees and consultants to officers and other appropriate supervisory personnel. It may also delegate its authority (other than its authority to determine the compensation of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer) to a subcommittee of the Compensation Committee. Finally, to the extent permitted by applicable law, the Compensation Committee may delegate to one or more officers of the Company (or other appropriate personnel) the authority to recommend stock options and other stock awards for employees who are not executive officers or members of the Board of Directors of the Company.

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee held two meetings in 2016. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee’s duties and responsibilities are to:

recommend to the Board of Directors director nominees for the annual meeting of stockholders;

identify and recommend candidates to fill vacancies occurring between annual stockholder meetings; and

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee identifies director candidates based on input provided by a number of sources, including members of the Committee, other directors, our stockholders, members of management and third parties. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee identified Mr. Pagliara as a director nominee based on recommendations from URI management and a former chairman of the Board of Directors. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee does not distinguish between nominees recommended by our stockholders and those recommended by other parties. Any stockholder recommendation must be sent to the Secretary of Uranium Resources, Inc. at 6950 S. Potomac Street, Suite 300, Centennial, Colorado 80112, and must include detailed background information regarding the suggested candidate that demonstrates how the individual meets the Board membership criteria discussed below. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee also has the authority to consult with or retain advisors or search firms to assist in the identification of qualified director candidates.

As part of the identification process, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee takes into account each candidate’s business and professional skills, experience serving in management or on the board of directors of companies similar to the Company, financial literacy, independence, personal integrity and judgment. In conducting this assessment, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will, in connection with its assessment and recommendation of candidates for director, consider diversity (including, but not limited to, gender, race, ethnicity, age, experience and skills) and such other factors as it deems appropriate given the then-current and anticipated future needs of the Board and the Company, and to maintain a balance of perspectives, qualifications, qualities and skills on the Board. The Board of Directors does not have a formal diversity policy for directors. However, the Board of Directors is committed to an inclusive membership. Although the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee may seek candidates that have different qualities and experiences at different times in order to maximize the aggregate experience, qualities and strengths of the Board members, nominees for each election or appointment of directors will be evaluated using a substantially similar process. Incumbent directors who are being considered for re-nomination are re-evaluated both on their performance as directors and their continued ability to meet the required qualifications.

The Health, Safety, Environment and Public Affairs Committee held one meeting in 2016. Its function is to provide oversight to the Company as the Company undertakes and conducts, in compliance with all regulatory, statutory and Company policies, its operations in an economically and socially responsible manner, with due regard to the safety and health of its employees, the impact of its operations on the natural environment, and the social, economic, health and environmental-related impacts in the communities in which the Company operates.

The Company has adopted a Code of Ethics for Senior Financial Officers, which is applicable to the Company’s chief executive officer, chief financial officer, controller, treasurer and chief internal auditor, and a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, which is applicable to all of the Company’s directors, officers and employees. The Company’s Code of Business Conduct and Ethics was revised by the Board on October 30, 2015 as part of the Company’s listing on the Australian Stock Exchange (“ASX”) that occurred as a result of the Company’s acquisition of Anatolia Energy Limited. Copies of the codes are available on our website at http://uraniumresources.com under “Corporate Governance,” or in print, without charge, to any stockholder who sends a request to the office of the Secretary of Uranium Resources, Inc. at 6950 S. Potomac Street, Suite 300, Centennial, Colorado 80112.

On October 30, 2015, the Board adopted the following policies as part of the Company’s listing on the ASX that occurred as a result of the Company’s acquisition of Anatolia Energy Limited.

Anti-Corruption Policy for the Use of Third-Party Agents Outside the United States

Copies of the foregoing policies are available on our website at http://uraniumresources.com under “Corporate Governance.”

The Company’s general policy with respect to related party transactions is included in its Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, the administration of which is overseen by the Audit Committee. Directors and officers of the Company are required to report any transaction that the Company would be required to disclose pursuant to Item 404(a) of Securities and Exchange Commission Regulation S-K (a “Related Party Transaction”) to the Audit Committee.

The Company collects information about potential Related Party Transactions in its annual questionnaire completed by directors and officers. Potential Related Party Transactions are subject to the review and approval of the non-interested members of the Audit Committee. In determining whether to approve any such transaction, the Audit Committee will consider such factors as it deems relevant, including, but not limited to, whether the transaction is on terms comparable to those that could be obtained in arm’s length negotiations with an unrelated third party.

The Company was not a party to any Related Party Transaction since the beginning of 2016.

During 2016, the Compensation Committee consisted of Mark K. Wheatley, Terence J. Cryan and Marvin K. Kaiser until March 16, 2016, and Marvin K. Kaiser, Tracy A. Stevenson and Patrick N. Burke after March 16, 2016. No member of the Compensation Committee is now, or was during 2016, an officer or employee of the Company. No member of the Compensation Committee had any relationship with the Company or any of its subsidiaries during 2016 pursuant to which disclosure would be required under applicable rules of the SEC pertaining to the disclosure of transactions with related persons. None of the executive officers of the Company currently serves or served during 2016 on the board of directors or compensation committee of another company at any time during which an executive officer of such other company served on the Company’s Board of Directors or Compensation Committee.

The Board of Directors has overall responsibility for risk oversight with a focus on the most significant risks facing the Company. The Board of Directors relies upon the President and Chief Executive Officer who reports directly to the Board and certain Committees on such matters as appropriate, to supervise day-to-day risk management.

The Board of Directors delegates certain oversight responsibilities to its Committees. For example, while the primary responsibility for financial and other reporting, internal controls, compliance with laws and regulations and ethics rests with the management of the Company, the Audit Committee provides risk oversight with respect to the Company’s financial statements, the Company’s compliance with legal and regulatory requirements and corporate policies and controls, and the independent auditor’s selection, retention, qualifications, objectivity and independence. Additionally, the Compensation Committee provides risk oversight with respect to the Company’s compensation programs, and the Nominating and Governance Committee provides risk oversight with respect to the Company’s governance structure and processes and succession planning. The Board and each Committee consider reports and presentations from the members of management responsible for the matters considered to enable the Board and each Committee to understand and discuss risk identification and risk management.

The Audit Committee, operating under a written charter adopted by the Board of Directors, reports to and acts on behalf of the Board of Directors by providing oversight of the Company’s independent auditors and the Company’s financial management and financial reporting procedures. Management has primary responsibility for preparing the Company’s financial statements and establishing and maintaining effective internal financial controls and for the public reporting process. Hein & Associates LLP, the Company’s independent registered public accountants, is responsible for auditing those financial statements and expressing an opinion on the conformity of the Company’s audited financial statements with generally accepted accounting principles.

In this context, the Audit Committee reviewed and discussed with management and Hein & Associates LLP the audited financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2016 and management’s assessment of the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. The Audit Committee has discussed with Hein & Associates LLP the matters that are required to be discussed by the applicable Public Company Accounting Oversight Board standards. Hein & Associates LLP has provided to the Audit Committee the written disclosures and the letter required by applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board regarding Hein & Associates LLP’s communications with the Audit Committee concerning independence, and the Audit Committee discussed with Hein & Associates LLP that firm’s independence. The Audit Committee also concluded that Hein & Associates LLP’s provision of audit and non-audit services to the Company and its affiliates is compatible with Hein & Associates LLP’s independence.

Based on the considerations referred to above, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that the audited financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2016 be included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for 2016 and selected Hein & Associates LLP as the independent registered public accountants for the Company for 2017.

The Report was submitted by the following members of the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors:

The information contained in the foregoing Audit Committee Report shall not be deemed “soliciting material” or “filed” with the SEC, nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into a future filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, except to the extent the Company specifically incorporates this Report by reference therein.

RATIFICATION OF THE APPOINTMENT OF THE INDEPENDENT
REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS (PROPOSAL NO. 2)

The Board of Directors has unanimously appointed Hein & Associates LLP to be our independent registered public accountants for the year ending December 31, 2017, and has further directed that management submit the appointment of our independent registered public accountants for ratification by the stockholders at the 2017 Annual Meeting. In recommending ratification by the stockholders of such appointment, the Board of Directors is acting upon the recommendation of the Audit Committee, which has satisfied itself as to the firm’s professional competence and standing.

Ratification of the appointment of Hein & Associates LLP by the stockholders is not required by law. As a matter of policy, however, such appointment is being submitted to the stockholders for ratification at the 2017 Annual Meeting because the Audit Committee and the Board of Directors believe this to be a good corporate practice. The persons designated in the enclosed proxy will vote your shares FOR ratification unless you include instruction in your signed proxy to the contrary. If the stockholders fail to ratify the appointment of this firm, the Board of Directors will reconsider the matter.

Representatives of Hein & Associates LLP are expected to be present at the Annual Meeting to answer appropriate questions from the stockholders and will be given an opportunity to make a statement on behalf of Hein & Associates LLP should they desire to do so. None of our directors or executive officers has any substantial interest, direct or indirect, in Hein & Associates LLP.

The following table presents fees billed for professional audit services rendered by Hein & Associates LLP, the Company’s independent registered public accountants, for the audit of the Company’s annual financial statements for 2015 and 2016, and fees billed for other services rendered by Hein & Associates LLP.

Audit fees include fees for the audits of the Company’s consolidated financial statements and for services that are usually provided by an auditor in connection with statutory and regulatory filings and engagements.

The Audit Committee is required to pre-approve the audit and non-audit services performed by the independent auditor to assure that the provision of such services does not impair the auditor’s independence. All of the foregoing services were pre-approved by the Audit Committee.

The executive officers serve at the discretion of the Board of Directors. All officers are employed on a full-time basis.

Please see above under “Election of Directors (Proposal No. 1)” for information about Christopher M. Jones, the Company’s President and Chief Executive Officer. The following paragraphs set forth certain information concerning the business experience of the Company’s other executive officers.

JEFFREY L. VIGIL joined the Company as Vice President – Finance and Chief Financial Officer in June 2013. Mr. Vigil is a mining industry financial veteran with more than thirty years of financial management experience in both production stage and development stage enterprises. Previously, he served in various financial positions, including Chief Financial Officer, at Energy Fuels, a uranium company, from April 2009 to May 2013, where he was responsible for financial and management reporting, equity financings, tax planning and compliance, treasury functions and risk management. Mr. Vigil also managed financial, operational and legal due diligence for a number of acquisitions. Mr. Vigil is a graduate of the University of Wyoming with a Bachelor of Science degree in Accounting and is a licensed Certified Public Accountant in the State of Colorado.

DAIN A. MCCOIG joined the Company in 2004 as Plant Engineer and was promoted to Kingsville Dome Plant Supervisor in 2005, Senior Engineer in August 2008, Manager – South Texas Operations in April 2010 and Vice President – South Texas Operations in January 2013. Mr. McCoig earned a Bachelor of Science degree in Mechanical Engineering from Colorado School of Mines in 2002 and attained his certification as a Professional Engineer from the Texas Board of Professional Engineers in 2010.

In this section, we discuss our compensation philosophy and describe the compensation program for our senior executive team. We explain how our Board’s Compensation Committee determines compensation for our senior executives and its rationale for specific 2016 decisions. We also discuss numerous changes the Committee has made to our program over the past several years to advance its fundamental objective: aligning our executive compensation with the long-term interests of our stockholders.

The Compensation Discussion and Analysis describes the compensation of the following named executive officers (“NEOs”):

On February 1, 2017, Mr. Wilton assumed the title of Chief Geologist and transitioned to part-time status with the Company. Previously, Mr. Wilton was the Company’s Vice President and Chief Geologist.

Our executive compensation program is designed to attract and retain qualified management personnel, to align our management’s interests with that of our stockholders, and to reward exceptional organizational and individual performance. Performance of our executives is evaluated based on financial and non-financial goals that balance achievement of short-terms goals related to the continued improvement of the Company’s business and long-term goals that seek to maximize stockholder value.

The Company achieved or advanced many of its operational and strategic goals during 2016 including:

Worked to advance the Binding Letter of Intent executed in 2015 with Laramide Resources Ltd. for the sale of Hydro Resources, Inc., whose primary assets are the Churchrock and Crownpoint mineral properties and buildings in New Mexico and an active NRC license, which closed on January 5, 2017.

Completion of the plugging and abandonment phase of the reclamation program at the Rosita project in South Texas.

Continued cost reductions, including 27 percent reduction of mineral property expenses and 2 percent reductions year-on-year in Net Cash Used and General and Administrative costs.

Execution of a plan to eliminate the $8 million convertible note with Resource Capital Funds V L.P., which was completed in February 2017.

Built a new lithium business to take advantage of favorable demand, supply and price fundamentals as well as the Company’s internal expertise.

Reduction of accounts payable from over $3 million at year-end 2015 to approximately $0.61 million at year-end 2016.

Completion of two registered direct offerings, utilization of the Company’s At-the-Market sales facility, and creation of an Equity Line of Credit with Aspire Capital to raise net proceeds of approximately $14.5 million for funding 2016 business activities.

Our compensation program provides total direct compensation to our NEOs that supports our philosophy of pay-for-performance and alignment of incentives between our management and stockholders. To that end, we have implemented the following policies and practices:

Significant “At-Risk” Compensation. A significant portion of NEO compensation and bonus opportunities are based on each NEO’s individual performance and the performance of the Company. Two-thirds of the initial grants to our CEO and CFO in 2013 (which continue to be the largest grants to our CEO and CFO) were performance-based, with a significant risk of forfeiture.

Long-Term Incentive Compensation. The long-term incentive compensation component of our compensation program includes stock options and RSUs tied to both performance and continued service. The award of such RSUs further aligns our management’s interests with our long-term performance and stockholder value.

Fixed Compensation. The fixed compensation elements of our compensation program include a base salary and retirement, health and welfare benefits.

Stock Ownership Guidelines. Our stock ownership guidelines require that the Company’s CEO and CFO obtain shares of our common stock valued at three times their base salaries to ensure that management’s interests are aligned with the long-term interests of our stockholders. These ownership requirements also serve as a retention tool through holding period requirements.

No Perquisites. We do not provide any perquisites, whether cash or otherwise, to our CEO, CFO or other NEOs.

Consideration of “Say-on-Pay” Vote. As in prior years, our stockholders continued to show strong support for our executive compensation program by approving such program with over 97% of votes cast in favor of the “say-on-pay” proposal at the 2016 Annual Meeting. The Compensation Committee views this continued support as a strong endorsement of our program.

Our compensation program is centered around a philosophy that focuses on management retention, alignment of interests between management and the stockholders and pay-for-performance compensation. We believe this philosophy allows us to compensate our NEOs competitively, while simultaneously ensuring continued development and achievement of key business strategy goals. The Compensation Committee firmly believes that our pay-for-performance philosophy should recognize both short- and long-term performance and should include both cash and equity compensation arrangements that are supported by strong corporate governance, including active and effective oversight by the Compensation Committee.

The Compensation Committee has outlined the following objectives for compensation of our NEOs and considers such objectives in making compensation decisions:

The Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors oversees the Company’s executive compensation programs. Additionally, the Compensation Committee is charged with the review and approval of all annual compensation decisions relating to the NEOs and the Company’s other officers.

The Compensation Committee is composed entirely of independent, non-management members of the Board of Directors. Each member of the Compensation Committee is both a “non-employee director” within the meaning of Rule 16b-3 of the Exchange Act, and an “outside director” within the meaning of Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code. No Compensation Committee member participates in any of the Company’s employee compensation programs. Each year the Company reviews any and all relationships that each director has with the Company, and the Board of Directors subsequently reviews these findings. The responsibilities of the Compensation Committee, as stated in its charter, include the following:

review and make such recommendations to the Board of Directors as the Compensation Committee deems advisable with regard to all incentive-based compensation plans and equity-based plans;

review and approve the corporate goals and objectives that may be relevant to the compensation of the Company’s NEOs;

evaluate the performance of the NEOs in light of the goals and objectives that were set and determine and approve the compensation of the NEOs based on such evaluation; and

review and approve the recommendations of the CEO with regard to the compensation of all officers of the Company other than the CEO.

The Compensation Committee considers input from the CEO when making executive compensation decisions for the other NEOs. The CEO’s input is useful because the CEO reviews and observes the performance of the other NEOs at the Company. No other NEO is present or privileged to the recommendations of the CEO to the Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee and Board of Directors determine the compensation of the CEO without any management input.

The Compensation Committee believes that a significant portion of each NEO’s compensation should be tied to the Company’s performance measured against specific financial performance targets. The Company measures financial performance awards against certain operational cost targets, budget targets and development, production and/or restoration objectives. The Compensation Committee also believes that a significant portion of NEO compensation should be tied to the creation and protection of stockholder value through the achievement of non-financial performance goals and core values. Both financial and non-financial performance goals have changed from time to time and will continue to change as the conditions of the Company and the uranium and lithium markets evolve. The Company’s core values are identified below.

The Company has historically evaluated its compensation program against the programs at other companies in order to ensure its compensation program is competitive. Peer companies were selected based on (i) revenue scope within a reasonable range, (ii) asset size within a reasonable range of the Company’s asset size, and (iii) mining companies with operational scope comparable to that of the Company – specifically, mining companies with operational activities versus pure “junior” developmental/exploration companies. To be reflective of the appropriate range of competitive pay practices, the group of companies used for this purpose was comprised of uranium mining companies in various stages of development and production, and in 2016 consisted of Azarga Uranium, Energy Fuels, UR Energy and Uranium Energy. The Company traditionally targeted all elements of its compensation programs to provide a competitive compensation opportunity at the median range of companies whose compensation is used in our peer group.

During 2013, the Compensation Committee utilized the services of an executive search firm which provided compensation data on current market salaries and incentive packages for executives in similarly sized mining companies in North America. The Committee negotiated salaries and long-term incentive opportunities directly with the Company’s new CEO and CFO in light of their level of experience, the Company’s compensation packages with its former CEO and CFO, and the need for the Company to conserve cash. For the Company’s other NEOs, the Committee largely continued base salary levels from prior years and established performance incentives with target payments similar to the Company’s legacy programs, although with a greater portion at risk based on the Company’s performance and the performance of the individual NEOs.

In evaluating stock price performance in 2016, the Compensation Committee compared the Company’s performance against the performance of the Global X Uranium ETF, which the Committee concluded represents a better measure of the status of the uranium industry than any potential peer group.

The Compensation Committee occasionally engages compensation consultants to assess executive pay packages and develop incentive plans. The Compensation Committee last utilized a consultant, Buck Consultants, LLC, in September 2010. The Company’s current short-term incentive program and long-term incentive program have certain similarities with plans developed with the assistance of Buck Consultants in 2010 and 2011, but none of the Company’s 2016 compensation decisions were the result of input from Buck Consultants or any other compensation consultant.

In June 2013, the Company adopted the Uranium Resources, Inc. 2013 Omnibus Incentive Plan (the “2013 OIP”). Prior to its adoption, the Company had three other stock incentive plans for officers and certain other employees: the Amended and Restated 1995 Stock Incentive Plan (the “1995 Plan”), the 2004 Stock Incentive Plan (the “2004 Plan”) and the 2007 Restricted Stock Plan (the “2007 Plan”). In addition, the Company had a stock incentive plan for directors: the 2004 Amended and Restated Directors’ Stock Option and Restricted Stock Plan (the “2004 Directors’ Plan” and together with the 1995 Plan, 2004 Plan and 2007 Plan, the “Prior Plans”). The Company adopted the 2013 OIP to provide flexibility in structuring its executive compensation program and to ensure that it would have a sufficient number of shares of common stock available for equity-based awards that it expects to make to eligible individuals over the next several years. The 2013 OIP replaced the Prior Plans and no more awards were or will be granted under the Prior Plans following the adoption of the 2013 OIP. We reserved a total of 83,333 shares of common stock for issuance pursuant to the 2013 OIP, plus shares that were reserved but unissued under the Prior Plans.

The 2013 OIP provides the Compensation Committee substantial flexibility in structuring awards that meet the objectives outlined above. In particular, the 2013 OIP permits the grant of performance-based and time-based RSUs, with many possible performance criteria available as the Compensation Committee determines to be appropriate. In addition to RSUs, the 2013 OIP provides for the grant of awards of stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, unrestricted stock, dividend equivalent rights, performance shares and other performance-based awards, other equity-based awards and cash bonus awards. All of our officers, directors and employees, and the officers, directors and employees of our subsidiaries and affiliates are eligible to receive awards under the 2013 OIP. In addition, consultants, advisors and certain other individuals whose participation in the 2013 OIP is determined to be in the best

interests of the Company by the Compensation Committee may participate. Incentive share options, however, are only available to our employees.

The 2013 OIP is administered by the Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee also interprets the provisions of the 2013 OIP. The Compensation Committee also determines who will receive awards under the 2013 OIP, the types of award made, the terms and conditions of awards, and the number of shares of common stock subject to an award, if the award is equity-based.

The following table illustrates the principal elements of the Company’s executive compensation program, each of which is evaluated and updated on an annual basis by the Compensation Committee:

In addition to the above-mentioned elements, the Company also provides a retirement, health and welfare benefit component to the executive compensation program.

The 2016 compensation mix for the Company’s CEO and CFO demonstrates the Company’s philosophy regarding significant long-term and performance-based compensation. Over 35% of the total compensation of the Company’s CEO, and approximately 30% of total compensation for all of the Company’s NEO, was performance-based. In addition, the significant equity grants made to the CEO and CFO in 2013 continued to incentivize long-term performance, with 2016 being the last performance year covered by the grants. The Compensation Committee anticipates granting additional long-term equity awards to the Company’s executive officers during the course of 2017 to continue aligning their long-term incentives with those of the Company’s stockholders.

The following is a summary of the components of the compensation policy for the Company’s NEOs. As described in greater detail below, for 2016 annual and long-term incentive programs were effective for each NEO—specifically, Messrs. Jones, Vigil and Wilton.

The Compensation Committee establishes base salaries for our executives based on the scope of their responsibilities, and takes into account competitive market compensation paid by comparable mining industry companies. The Company believes that a competitive compensation program will enhance its ability to attract and retain senior executives. In each case, the Compensation Committee takes into account each officer’s (i) current and prior compensation, (ii) scope of responsibilities, (iii) experience, (iv) comparable market salaries and (v) the Company’s achievement of performance goals (both financial and non-financial). The Compensation Committee also (i) has the opportunity to meet with the officers at various times during the year, which allows the Compensation Committee to form its own assessment of each individual’s performance and (ii) reviews reports of the CEO presented to the Compensation Committee, evaluating each of the other officers, including a review of their contributions and performance over the past year, strengths, weaknesses, development plans and succession potential.

For fiscal 2016, after taking into account the above-mentioned factors, historical base salaries, the performance of the NEOs and the challenging uranium pricing environment, the Compensation Committee maintained base salaries for our NEOs at the same levels as in fiscal 2015, as follows:

For more information about the 2016 base salaries for each of our NEOs, please see “2016 Summary Compensation Table” on page 26.

The Company offers a variety of health and welfare and retirement programs to all eligible employees. The NEOs generally are eligible for the same benefit programs on the same basis as the rest of the Company’s employees. The Company’s health and welfare programs include medical, dental and vision. In addition to the foregoing, the NEOs are eligible to participate in the following programs:

401(k) Profit Sharing Plan. The Company maintains a defined contribution profit sharing plan for employees (the “401(k)”) that is administered by a committee of trustees appointed by the Company. All Company employees are eligible to participate upon the completion of one month of employment, subject to minimum age requirements. In past years, the Company has made contributions to the 401(k) without regard to current or accumulated net profits of the Company, but the Company suspended matching contributions at the beginning of January 2015.

We do not provide any perquisites, whether cash or otherwise, to our NEOs. We feel that our executive compensation program, particularly given the challenging uranium pricing environment, provides our NEOs with competitive compensation such that we do not need to provide any perquisites to achieve the goals of our executive compensation program.

In 2016, the Compensation Committee established a short-term incentive program pursuant to which each of the NEOs could earn cash or stock based on the achievement of individualized performance measures. The target value of the award was established at 60% of base salary in the case of the CEO and 30% of base salary in the case of the other NEOs. For fiscal 2016, the performance measures and weighting of the measure for each NEO were as follows:

No OSHA reportable safety incidents or environmental recordable incidents in 2015 (20%)

In 2016, the Compensation Committee also set long-term performance criteria for each of the NEOs. The long-term compensation program serves to create a balance between long-term and short-term performance imperatives. In the case of the CEO and CFO, two-thirds of Mr. Jones’s initial restricted stock grant and option grant, and two-thirds of Mr. Vigil’s RSU grant, vest based upon the achievement of such performance criteria, with the other one-third in each case vesting based upon continued service to the Company.

The Compensation Committee expects the incentive program to evolve over time as the Company transitions from its current primary focus on developmental and restoration activities to an operational focus driving towards enhancement of profit and stockholder returns.

The Compensation Committee believes that stock ownership by senior management and stock-based performance compensation arrangements are beneficial in aligning management and stockholders’ interests and serves as an executive retention tool through vesting and post-vesting holding period requirements. To that end, the employment agreements for each of Mr. Jones and Mr. Vigil establish stock ownership targets for each executive of stock valued at three times the initial base salary of each executive under the employment agreements. Each of Mr. Jones and Mr. Vigil has five years from his respective employment date to reach the stock ownership target.

No substantial changes to the Company’s compensation programs are currently envisioned for 2017. The target compensation packages for our NEOs will continue to be comprised of base salary and, subject to Compensation Committee approval, a performance-based annual incentive plan pursuant to the short-term incentive program and time-based and performance-based awards under the long-term incentive program. Base salaries have been positioned to reflect job content and competitive pay practices, as discussed above.

In 2016, as in prior years, we sought an advisory vote from our stockholders regarding our executive compensation program and received over 97% favorable vote supporting the program. The Compensation Committee considers the results of the advisory vote as it completes its annual review of each pay element and the compensation packages provided to our NEOs. Given the significant level of stockholder support and our stockholder outreach throughout the year, the Compensation Committee concluded that our compensation program continues to provide a competitive pay for performance package that effectively incentivizes our NEOs to maximize stockholder value. The Compensation Committee will continue to consider the outcome of our say-on-pay votes and our stockholder views when making future compensation decisions for our NEOs.

We have entered into employment agreements with Messrs. Jones and Vigil that provide payments following the termination of employment under certain circumstances, including following a change in control of the Company. The Compensation Committee believes such agreements are useful in recruiting and retaining executives, provide continuity of management in the event of an actual or threatened change in control and provide the executives with the security to make decisions that are in the best long-term interest of the stockholders. The terms of these agreements are described on page 28 under “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control.”

In addition, awards under the Company’s equity incentive plans generally vest or accelerate upon a change in control of the Company. The Compensation Committee believes that the above-mentioned vesting and acceleration is appropriate on the basis that our NEOs should receive the full benefit of such awards in the event of a change in control.

Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code generally places a $1,000,000 limit on the deductibility for federal income tax purposes of the annual compensation paid to a company’s CEO and each of its other three most highly compensated executive officers (excluding the CFO). However, “qualified performance-based compensation” is exempt from this deductibility limitation. Qualified performance-based compensation is compensation paid based solely upon the achievement of objective performance goals, the material terms of which are approved by the stockholders of the paying corporation.

The Compensation Committee considers the anticipated tax treatment to the Company when determining executive compensation and routinely seeks to structure its executive compensation program in a way that preserves the deductibility of compensation payments and benefits. It should be noted, however, that there are many factors which are considered by the Compensation Committee in determining executive compensation and, similarly, there are many factors that may affect the deductibility of executive compensation. In order to maintain the flexibility to be able to compensate NEOs in a manner designed to promote varying corporate goals, the Compensation Committee has not adopted a strict policy that all executive compensation must be deductible under Section 162(m).

Effective February 1, 2017, the Compensation Committee approved an increase of 5 percent in the salaries paid to the NEOs, except that Mr. Wilton’s salary was adjusted to reflect his transition to part-time status. In addition, on May 22, 2017, Mr. Vigil signed an amendment to his employment agreement that is address on page 27 below.

The following table sets forth information regarding 2016 and 2015 compensation for each of our 2016 NEOs;

The amounts shown under Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation reflect earnings by the named executive officers under URI’s short-term earnings program for the fiscal year in which such amounts are earned, regardless of when paid. Bonuses under URI’s short-term incentive program are generally paid the year following the year in which the bonus is earned. Bonuses were paid in 2016 as a result of 2015 performance.

Because of uncertainty during the first half of 2016 resulting from liquidity challenges and a change in the membership of the Compensation Committee, the Compensation Committee did not establish performance measures for the Company’s short-term incentive program during 2016. Instead, in evaluating 2016 performance during the first quarter of 2017, the Compensation Committee used substantially the same performance measures as were used to evaluate performance for 2015. Payments under the 2016 short-term earnings program are consequently reflected under the Bonus column rather than the Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation column. The Compensation Committee has established performance measures for 2017 performance and anticipates that future payments under URI’s short-term incentive program will be reflected as Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation.

Includes life insurance premiums paid by the Company on behalf of the named officer, with the exception of Mr. Jones which includes life insurance premiums of $1,253 paid by the Company on his behalf and $25,407 paid to Mr. Jones as compensation for his position as interim Chairman of the Board of Directors.

On March 12, 2013, the Company entered into an employment agreement with Mr. Jones in connection with his joining the Company as President and CEO. Pursuant to his employment agreement, Mr. Jones is entitled to an annual base salary, which was set initially at $275,000 and was subject to annual adjustment by the Compensation Committee, has a target bonus equal to 60% of his base salary, and was awarded 2,083 shares of the Company’s restricted stock and an option to purchase 4,583 shares of the Company’s common stock. In the event of a change of control (as defined therein), if Mr. Jones is terminated without cause (as defined therein), demoted or has his responsibilities materially changed, or circumstances arise that constitute good reason (as defined therein), the Company will pay Mr. Jones a severance amount equal to two years of base salary, in a lump sum within 30 days after his termination or termination of the agreement. If the Company otherwise terminates Mr. Jones without cause or fails to renew the employment agreement, or Mr. Jones otherwise terminates his employment for good reason, the Company will pay Mr. Jones severance in the amount of one year of base salary in a lump sum within 30 days after the termination date.

On June 11, 2013, the Company entered into an employment agreement with Mr. Vigil in connection with his joining the Company as Vice President – Finance and CFO. Pursuant to his employment agreement, Mr. Vigil is entitled to an annual base salary, which was set initially at $200,000 and was subject to annual adjustment by the Compensation Committee, has a target bonus equal to 30% of his base salary, and also provided for a grant of 6,666 restricted stock units. The employment agreement also provided that in the event of a change of control (as defined therein), if Mr. Vigil is terminated without cause (as defined therein), demoted or has his responsibilities materially changed, or circumstances arise that constitute good reason (as defined therein), the Company will pay Mr. Vigil a severance amount equal to one year of base salary, in a lump sum within 30 days after his termination or termination of the agreement. However, on May 22, 2017, Mr. Vigil signed an amendment to his employment agreement to increase this severance payment from one year to one-and-a-half years of base salary. The employment agreement continues to provide that if the Company otherwise terminates Mr. Vigil without cause or fails to renew the employment agreement, or Mr. Vigil otherwise terminates his employment for good reason, the Company will pay Mr. Vigil severance in the amount of six months of base salary in a lump sum within 30 days after the termination date.

Each employment agreement also contains customary confidentiality, non-competition and non-solicitation provisions. Each executive has agreed not to perform any work in the United States related in any way to uranium mining, or to solicit customers, suppliers or employees of the Company, during the term of the employment agreement and for a period of one year thereafter in the case of Mr. Jones or six month thereafter in the case of Mr. Vigil.

Other than the foregoing employment agreements, we do not have any other employment agreements with our executive officers.

The following table shows outstanding stock option awards classified as exercisable and unexercisable as of December 31, 2016 for the NEOs. The table also shows unvested and unearned stock awards and RSUs assuming a market value of $1.37 per share, the closing market price of the Company’s stock on December 31, 2016.

The reported award represents the unvested portion of options and RSUs that vest as follows: one-third in equal installments on January 2, 2015, 2016 and 2017, and the remaining two-thirds over three years subject to the achievement of performance objectives.

The following table sets forth certain information regarding options, restricted stock awards and restricted stock units exercised and vested, respectively, during 2016 for the NEOs.

The Company has entered into employment agreements with each of Mr. Jones and Mr. Vigil. See “Employment Agreements” on pages 26 and 27 above. In the event of a change of control, if either executive is terminated without cause (as defined therein), demoted or has his responsibilities materially changed, or circumstances arise that constitute good reason (as defined therein), the Company will pay severance in an amount equal to two years of base salary in the case of Mr. Jones and one-and-a-half years of base salary in the case of Mr. Vigil, in each case in a lump sum within 30 days after his termination or termination of the agreement. If the Company otherwise terminates either executive, including following the disability of either executive, without cause, or fails to renew either employment agreement, or either executive otherwise terminates his employment for good reason, the Company will pay severance in an amount equal to one year of base salary in the case of Mr. Jones and six months of base salary in the case of Mr. Vigil, in each case in a lump sum within 30 days after the termination date. The employment agreements automatically terminate upon the death of the executive.

The employment agreements define “change of control” as (i) any person or group of affiliated or associated persons (other than RCF or RMB Australia Holdings, Ltd. or related entities) acquires more than 50% of the voting power of the Company; (ii) the consummation of a sale of all or substantially all of the assets of the Company; (iii) the dissolution of the Company; (iv) a majority of the members of the Board are replaced during any 12-month period; or (v) the consummation of any merger, consolidation, or reorganization involving the Company in which, immediately after giving effect to such merger, consolidation or reorganization, less than 50.1% of the total voting power of outstanding stock of the surviving or resulting entity is then “beneficially owned” (within the meaning of Rule 13d-3 under the Exchange Act) in the aggregate by the stockholders of the Company immediately prior to such merger, consolidation or reorganization.

Upon a change in control, the stock options granted under our 2004 Plan, the restricted stock granted under our 2007 Plan and any awards under our 2013 OIP will immediately vest in full, to the extent not already vested, for all of our NEOs.

The Compensation Committee has reviewed and discussed the foregoing Compensation Discussion and Analysis with management. Based on this review and discussion, the Compensation Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this Proxy Statement and incorporated by reference into the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016.

This Report was submitted by the following members of the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors:

The information contained in the foregoing Compensation Committee Report shall not be deemed “soliciting material” or “filed” with the SEC, nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into a future filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, except to the extent the Company specifically incorporates this Report by reference therein.

In accordance with Section 14A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, we are asking stockholders to approve the following advisory resolution at the 2017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders:

“RESOLVED, that the compensation paid to the Company’s named executive officers, as disclosed pursuant to Item 402 of Regulation S-K, including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, compensation tables and narrative discussion, is hereby approved.”

We are asking stockholders to approve an advisory resolution on compensation of our named executive officers as described in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the compensation tables and related narrative discussion included in this Proxy Statement. This proposal, commonly known as a “say-on-pay” proposal, gives stockholders the opportunity to approve, reject or abstain from voting with respect to our executive compensation programs and policies and the compensation paid to the named executive officers. This vote is not intended to address any specific item of compensation, but rather the overall compensation of our named executive officers as described in this Proxy Statement.

As described in detail under the heading “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” and in the compensation tables and narrative disclosures that accompany the compensation tables, the Company’s compensation program for the named executive officers is designed to reward exceptional organizational and individual performance. The primary objectives of our compensation program are to (i) enhance the Company’s ability to attract and retain knowledgeable and experienced senior executives, (ii) drive and reward performance which supports the Company’s core values, (iii) provide a percentage of total compensation that is “at-risk”, or variable, based on predetermined performance criteria, (iv) require significant stock holdings to align the interests of our CEO and CFO with those of stockholders, and (v) set compensation and incentive levels that reflect competitive market practices.

Although the vote on this proposal is advisory only, the Board of Directors and the Compensation Committee will review and consider the voting results when evaluating our executive compensation program.

In 2016, the compensation of non-employee directors consisted of an annual $50,000 cash retainer, earned at a rate of $12,500 per quarter. The compensation of our interim Chairman of the Board, Mr. Jones, consisted of $8,000 per quarter. The compensation of the prior Chairman of the Board, Mr. Cryan, consisted of $27,500 per quarter. All of our directors are also reimbursed for reasonable out-of-pocket expenses related to attendance at Board and Committee meetings.

In addition, each non-employee director earned $1,250 per quarter for each Committee served upon, with the Chairman of each Committee earning either an additional $2,500 per quarter (in the case of the Audit and Compensation Committees) or $1,250 per quarter (in the case of the Nominating and Corporate Governance and the Health, Safety, Environment and Public Affairs Committees) for such service.

The following table summarizes all compensation earned by the Company’s directors, excluding Mr. Jones, whose compensation is set forth in the 2016 Summary Compensation Table, in the year ended December 31, 2016.

Mr. Cryan and Mr. Wheatley resigned from the Board effective March 16, 2016, and Mr. Burke was appointed to the Board effective the same date.

The number of RSUs and vested and unvested stock options held by each non-employee director at fiscal year-end 2016 is shown below:

The following table provides information as of December 31, 2016 with respect to the shares of URI common stock that may be issued under our equity compensation plans.

Includes our 2013 OIP, 2007 Restricted Stock Plan, 2004 Directors’ Plan and Restricted Stock Plan, 2004 Stock Incentive Plan and Amended and Restated 1995 Stock Incentive Plan. Our 2013 Omnibus Incentive Plan is the only equity compensation plan under which we currently issue equity awards. As of June 4, 2013, our 2013 OIP superseded our prior plans.

Upon the Company’s acquisition of Anatolia Energy Ltd in November 2015, the Company assumed Anatolia Energy’s stock-compensation plans. URI will make no further issuances or grants under the Anatolia Energy Ltd. plans. At December 31, 2016, there were 104,229 shares underlying exercisable options with a weighted-average exercise price of $14.21 per share.

ADVISORY VOTE ON THE FREQUENCY OF FUTURE ADVISORY VOTES ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION (PROPOSAL NO. 4)

In accordance with Section 14A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, we are asking stockholders to indicate their preference for how frequently the Company should seek advisory approval of our named executive officer compensation, such as the “say-on-pay” vote included in Proposal No. 3 above. By voting on this Proposal No. 4, stockholders may indicate whether they would prefer an advisory vote on our named executive officer compensation once every one, two or three years.

The Company has held annual say-on-pay votes starting with the 2011 annual meeting. The Board continues to believe that an advisory vote on our executive compensation every year is most appropriate and recommends stockholders approve an annual advisory vote on named executive officer compensation. Holding an annual advisory vote on executive compensation allows stockholders to provide timely input on our compensation philosophy, policies and practices and provides a direct and simple means to express investor sentiment regarding our executive compensation program.

Stockholders should understand they are not voting “for” or “against” a recommendation of the Board; rather, stockholders are asked to choose whether future advisory votes on named executive officer compensation should be held every one, two or three years. Stockholders may also abstain from voting. This vote is advisory and not binding on the Board or the Company and the final decision on the frequency of future advisory votes on named executive compensation remains with the Board. The Board values the opinions expressed by our stockholders through their votes and will carefully consider the outcome of the vote when making future decisions regarding the frequency of future advisory votes on named executive compensation.

APPROVAL OF AN AMENDMENT TO OUR 2013 OMNIBUS INCENTIVE PLAN TO INCREASE THE AUTHORIZED NUMBER OF SHARES OF COMMON STOCK AVAILABLE AND RESERVED FOR ISSUANCE UNDER SUCH PLAN BY ONE MILLION SHARES AND RE-APPROVAL OF THE MATERIAL TERMS OF THE PERFORMANCE GOALS UNDER SUCH PLAN (PROPOSAL NO. 5)

The Uranium Resources, Inc. 2013 Omnibus Incentive Plan (the “2013 OIP”) is the sole active plan that provides for equity incentive compensation to our eligible officers, employees and non-employee directors. The Board believes that the 2013 OIP is in the best interests of the Company and our stockholders, as equity awards help to attract, retain and motivate the directors, officers and employees of the Company to achieve long-term performance goals and enable them to participate in the long-term growth of the Company.

Stockholders originally approved the 2013 OIP at our June 4, 2013 annual meeting of stockholders, authorizing the issuance of up to 83,333 shares of our common stock, plus (y) the number of shares available for awards under our prior equity plans as of June 4, 2013, plus (z) the number of shares related to awards outstanding under our prior equity plans as of June 4, 2013 which thereafter terminate by expiration, forfeiture, cancellation or otherwise without the issuance of such shares.

On December 6, 2016, our Board approved, subject to stockholder approval at a Special Meeting of Stockholders that was to occur on February 8, 2017 and approval by its Compensation Committee, an amendment to the 2013 OIP to authorize additional shares for issuance under the 2013 OIP, and on December 6, 2016, our Board also authorized its Compensation Committee to identify the specific number of shares that should be added to the 2013 OIP, subject to stockholder approval at the Special Meeting of Stockholders that was to occur on February 8, 2017. In December 2016, our Compensation Committee approved, subject to stockholder approval at the Special Meeting, an increase of one million shares in the number of shares available under the 2013 OIP.

The Special Meeting of Stockholders that was to occur on February 8, 2017 did not occur as a result of the lack of a quorum to convene the meeting. Therefore, on May 10, 2017, the Board of Directors approved the submission of the amendment to the 2013 OIP for stockholder consideration at the 2017 Annual Meeting. Our Board and its Compensation Committee believe that stock-based awards are important in recruiting and retaining highly qualified officers, employees and non-employee directors. The 2013 OIP, as proposed to be amended, will allow the Company to continue to grant stock based awards over the next several years and will continue to permit us the flexibility to determine the types and specific terms of awards made to participants. This flexibility allows us to make future awards based on our objectives of aligning compensation with stockholder value.

The following table summarizes the number of shares of common stock subject to outstanding stock-based awards under the 2013 OIP and our prior equity plans, along with the shares remaining available for issuance under the 2013 OIP, in each case as of December 31, 2016:

The weighted average exercise price of the outstanding stock options as of December 31, 2016 was approximately $160.39 per share. Excludes 104,229 replacement options issued to the former option holders of Anatolia Energy Limited upon the Company’s acquisition of Anatolia Energy on November 9, 2015.

In addition, the Board of Directors is requesting this vote in order to obtain stockholder re-approval of the material terms of the 2013 OIP for purposes of Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code (the “Code”). In general, Section 162(m) places a limit on the deductibility for federal income tax purposes of the compensation paid to our Chief Executive Officer and each of our three other most highly compensated executive officers (other than our Chief Financial Officer). Under Section 162(m), compensation paid to such persons in excess of $1 million in a taxable year generally is not deductible. However, compensation that qualifies as “performance based” under Section 162(m) does not count against the $1 million deduction limitation. One of the requirements of “performance based” compensation for purposes of Section 162(m) is that the material terms of the plan under which compensation may be paid be disclosed to and approved by our stockholders and re-approved at least every five years thereafter. For purposes of Section 162(m), the material terms include (a) the employees eligible to receive compensation, (b) a description of the business criteria on which the performance goals may be based and (c) the maximum amount of compensation that can be paid to an employee under the plan. Each of these aspects of the 2013 OIP, as proposed to be amended, is discussed below, and stockholder approval of this Proposal No. 5 will be deemed to constitute re-approval of the material terms of the 2013 OIP, as amended, for purposes of the stockholder approval requirements of Section 162(m).

The Company does not currently anticipate awarding compensation to any of its officers in excess of $1 million per year but believes it is prudent to seek stockholder approval to permit the Company to take advantage of the “performance based” compensation exemption under Section 162(m) should the circumstances so warrant. In addition, stockholder approval of the 2013 OIP, as amended, is only one of several requirements under Section 162(m) that must be satisfied for amounts realized under the 2013 OIP, as amended, to qualify for the “performance based” compensation exemption under Section 162(m), and submission of the material terms of the 2013 OIP, as amended, for stockholder re-approval should not be viewed as a guarantee that we will be able to deduct all compensation under the 2013 OIP, as amended. Nothing in this proposal precludes us or the Compensation Committee from making any payment or granting awards that do not qualify for tax deductibility under Section 162(m).

Upon stockholder approval of the amendment to the 2013 OIP, it will become effective. If the stockholders do not approve the amendment to the 2013 OIP, it will not become effective, the existing 2013 OIP will continue in effect, and we may continue to grant awards under the existing 2013 OIP, subject to its terms, conditions and limitations.

Our executive officers and directors have an interest in this proposal as they would be eligible to receive awards under the amended 2013 OIP.

A copy of the proposed amendment is attached to this proxy statement as Appendix A, and a full copy of the 2013 OIP as amended is attached hereto as Appendix B.

The Board recommends a vote FOR the approval of the amendment to the 2013 OIP and the re-approval of the material terms of the performance goals under the 2013 OIP.

The price of uranium has declined significantly over the last several years, from approximately $39.60 per pound in June 2013 to approximately $22.63 per pound in April 2017, in the case of spot prices, and from approximately $57.00 per pound to approximately $33.00 per pound in the case of long-term prices. Prices at this low level have not been seen by the industry since 2006. Like many uranium companies, we have experienced a sharp decline in the value of our common stock, from $36.00 per share at the time of stockholder approval of the 2013 OIP in June 2013 to $1.62 as of May 15, 2017.

While we have made strides to better position the Company for growth and future success the past several years, including by embarking on a growth strategy in the lithium industry, we are committed to further improving the Company’s performance, and significant continued effort, focus and dedication will be necessary from our management and employees to do so. We believe it will be critical to our future success that we take steps to maintain the competitiveness of our incentive pay programs and that we continue to tightly align these incentive opportunities with the interests of our stockholders.

To achieve these critical objectives, as discussed more fully below, we are seeking additional shares for issuance under the 2013 OIP.

Our ability to recruit, retain, reward and motivate employees and officers depends in part on our ability to offer competitive equity compensation. We believe we would be at a competitive disadvantage if we could not continue to use stock-based awards to recruit and compensate these individuals.

We have continued to face industry and economic headwinds and experienced challenges relating to our market capitalization. Given our stock price and market capitalization, delivering competitive compensation to our employees will require granting more shares as compared to our prior practice and grants made by our peer companies with higher stock values. Despite the resulting additional dilution, we believe that it is critical that we continue to retain our employees by delivering competitive levels of equity compensation.

By approving the amendment to the 2013 OIP, based on our current stock price, we anticipate we could deliver competitive equity compensation and grant stock-based awards for the next several years.

We believe that the use of stock-based awards as part of our compensation program is important to our continued success because it fosters a pay for performance culture, which is an important element of our overall compensation program. We believe stock-based compensation motivates employees to create stockholder value because the value employees realize from stock-based compensation is directly aligned with creation of stockholder value as reflected by the share price of the Company.

As discussed above, we believe that stock-based compensation aligns the goals and objectives of our employees with the interests of our stockholders and promotes a focus on long-term value creation. This long-term alignment between our employees and the interests of our stockholders is critical as our management strives to execute on our vision and growth plans. Stock-based awards that are subject to time- or performance-based vesting are designed to help retain our management and employees during this period of development and will motivate them to attain our potential.

Given our stock price, all of our outstanding stock options are significantly underwater, meaning they have an exercise price greater than $1.62 per share. Stock option awards that are significantly underwater no longer have the same retentive or incentive capacity, making our ability to grant new stock awards at current stock prices even more important. In addition, the value of unvested restricted stock and restricted stock units has declined significantly from the time of grant.

If we do not have the flexibility to grant stock-based awards made available by the increased reserve under the amendment to the 2013 OIP, we will need to increase the cash component of our employees’ compensation in order to remain market competitive. Increasing cash compensation would increase our cash compensation expense and would divert cash that could otherwise be invested in the Company’s business.

We are requesting approval of the amendment to the 2013 OIP in order to continue to recruit and retain the key employee talent that is vital to the execution of our vision and growth plans and to continue to tightly align compensation opportunities with the creation of stockholder value.

As discussed in more detail below, our 2013 OIP includes provisions designed to serve stockholders’ interests and promote effective corporate governance, including the following:

No “Evergreen Provision.” The 2013 OIP specifies a fixed number of shares available for future grants and does not provide for any automatic increase based on the number of outstanding shares of our common stock.

No Discounted Awards. The 2013 OIP prohibits the granting of stock options and stock appreciation rights with an exercise or grant price that is less than the fair market value of our common stock on the date the award is granted.

No Re-pricing without Stockholder Approval. The 2013 OIP prohibits the re-pricing of stock options and stock appreciation rights, without first obtaining the approval of our stockholders.

As of December 31, 2016, we had 54,460 shares available for issuance of future stock-based awards under the 2013 OIP. In setting and recommending to stockholders the additional number of shares to be authorized for issuance under the 2013 OIP, as amended, the Board considered the following information:

Does not include unrestricted bonus shares issued under the 2013 OIP in lieu of cash bonuses in March 2015.

Excludes 104,229 replacement options issued to the former option holders of Anatolia Energy Limited upon the Company’s acquisition of Anatolia Energy on November 9, 2015.

If we do not increase the shares available for issuance under our 2013 OIP, based on the market price of our common stock, we would expect to exhaust the share reserve under our 2013 OIP such that there will not be enough shares for meaningful equity compensation in fiscal 2017, and we would thus lose an important compensation tool aligned with stockholder interests to attract, motivate and retain employees.

If approved, the issuance of the additional shares to be reserved under the 2013 OIP, as amended, would dilute the holdings of stockholders by an additional 3.9% on a fully-diluted basis, based on the 24.7 million shares of our common stock outstanding as of May 22, 2017.

In light of the factors described above, our Board of Directors believes the additional authorized shares being requested under the amendment to the 2013 OIP represents reasonable potential equity dilution and provides significant incentive for officers, employees, non-employee directors and consultants to increase the value of the Company for all stockholders.

The major features of the 2013 OIP, as proposed to be amended, are summarized below.

Including the proposed amendment, the following is a general description of the material features of the 2013 OIP and its operation. A copy of the 2013 OIP is attached as Appendix B to this Proxy Statement. The description below is qualified in its entirety by the detailed provisions of the 2013 OIP, which are set forth in Appendix B, and the proposed amendment, which are set forth in Appendix A. Because participation in and the types of award to be granted under the 2013 OIP are subject to the discretion of our Compensation Committee, the benefits or amounts that will be received by any participant or group of participants are not currently determinable.

All of our officers, directors and employees, and the officers, directors and employees of our subsidiaries and affiliates, are eligible to receive awards under the 2013 OIP. In addition, consultants, advisers and certain other individuals whose participation in the 2013 OIP is determined to be in the best interests of the Company by the Compensation Committee may participate. Incentive share options, however, are only available to our employees. As of December 31, 2016, we estimate that approximately 36 individuals were eligible to receive awards under the 2013 OIP.

The 2013 OIP is administered by our Compensation Committee, and our Compensation Committee determines all terms of awards under the 2013 OIP. Each member of our Compensation Committee is both a “non-employee director” within the meaning of Rule 16b-3 of the Exchange Act, and an “outside director” within the meaning of Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code. Our Compensation Committee also determines who will receive awards under the 2013 OIP, the types of award and their terms and conditions and the number of shares of common stock subject to awards, if an award is equity-based. Our Compensation Committee also interprets the provisions of the 2013 OIP. During any period of time in which we do not have a Compensation Committee, the 2013 OIP will be administered by the Board of Directors or another committee appointed by the Board of Directors. References herein to our Compensation Committee include a reference to the Board of Directors or another committee appointed by the Board of Directors for those periods in which the Board of Directors or such other committee appointed by the Board of Directors is acting.

The maximum number of shares of common stock available for awards under the 2013 OIP is equal to the sum of (x) 1,083,333 shares (including the additional 1,000,000 shares subject to the amendment), plus (y) the number of shares available for awards under our prior equity plans as of June 4, 2013, plus (z) the number of shares related to awards outstanding under our prior equity plans as of June 4, 2013 which thereafter terminate by expiration, forfeiture, cancellation or otherwise without the issuance of such shares. In connection with stock splits, distributions, recapitalizations and certain other events, the Board of Directors will make proportionate adjustments that it deems appropriate in the aggregate number of shares of common stock that may be issued under the 2013 OIP and the terms of outstanding awards. If any awards terminate, expire or are canceled, forfeited, exchanged or surrendered without having been exercised or paid or if any awards are forfeited or expire or otherwise terminate without the delivery of any shares of common stock, the shares of common stock subject to such awards will again be available for purposes of the 2013 OIP. However, the number of shares of common stock available for issuance under the 2013 OIP will not be increased by the number of shares of common stock (i) tendered or withheld or subject to an award surrendered in connection with the purchase of shares of common stock upon exercise of an option, (ii) deducted or delivered from payment of an award in connection with our tax withholding obligations, or (iii) purchased by us with the proceeds from option exercises.

The maximum number of shares of common stock subject to options or stock appreciation rights that can be issued under the 2013 OIP to any person is 200,000 shares in any single calendar year. The maximum number of shares that can be issued under the 2013 OIP to any person other than pursuant to an option or stock appreciation right is 200,000 shares in any single calendar year. The maximum amount that may be paid as a cash-settled performance-based award for a performance period of twelve months or less to any person eligible for an award is $400,000 and the maximum amount that may be paid as a cash-settled performance-based award for a performance period of greater than twelve months to any person eligible for an award is also $400,000.

Each share subject to an award, including through dividend reinvestment rights, is counted against the share issuance limit on a one-for-one basis. The number of shares subject to a stock appreciation right is also counted against the share issuance limit on a one-for-one basis, regardless of the number of shares actually issued to settle the stock appreciation right. An award that, by its terms, cannot be settled in shares of stock will not count against the share issuance limit.

Except in connection with certain corporate transactions, no amendment or modification may be made to an outstanding stock option or stock appreciation right, including by replacement with or substitution of another award type, that would reduce the exercise price of the stock option or stock appreciation right or would replace any stock option or stock appreciation right with an exercise price above the current market price with cash or another security, in each case without the approval of our stockholders (although appropriate adjustments may be made to outstanding stock options and stock appreciation rights to achieve compliance with applicable law, including the Internal Revenue Code).

The 2013 OIP authorizes our Compensation Committee to grant incentive stock options (under Section 422 of the Internal Revenue Code) and options that do not qualify as incentive stock options. The exercise price of each option is determined by our Compensation Committee, provided that the price cannot be less than 100% of the fair market value of a share of common stock on the date on which the option is granted. If we were to grant incentive stock options to any stockholder owning more than 10% of our common stock (a “10% stockholder”), the exercise price may not be less than 110% of the fair market value of a share of our common stock on the date of grant.

The term of an option cannot exceed 10 years from the date of grant. If we were to grant incentive stock options to any 10% stockholder, the term cannot exceed five years from the date of grant. Our Compensation Committee determines at what time or times each option may be exercised and the period of time, if any, after retirement, death, disability or termination of employment during which options may be exercised. Options may be made exercisable in installments. The exercisability of options may be accelerated by our Compensation Committee.

The exercise price for any option or the purchase price for shares of restricted stock is generally payable (i) in cash or cash equivalents, (ii) to the extent the award agreement provides, by the surrender of shares of common stock (or attestation of ownership of such shares) with an aggregate fair market value on the date on which the option is exercised or the date shares are tendered to satisfy the purchase price, of the exercise or purchase price, (iii) with respect to an option only, to the extent the award agreement provides, by payment through a broker in accordance with procedures established by us, or (iv) to the extent the award agreement provides and/or unless otherwise specified in an award agreement, any other form permissible by applicable laws, including net exercise and service to us.

The 2013 OIP also provides for the grant of stock awards, which includes restricted stock, unrestricted stock and stock units. An award of shares of common stock may be subject to restrictions on transferability and other restrictions as our Compensation Committee determines in its sole discretion on the date of grant. The restrictions, if any, may lapse over a specified period of time or through the satisfaction of conditions, in installments or otherwise, as our Compensation Committee may determine. A participant who receives restricted stock will have all of the rights of a stockholder as to those shares, including, without limitation, the right to vote and the right to receive dividends or distributions on the shares of stock, except that the Board of Directors may require any dividends to be reinvested in shares of stock. A participant who receives stock units will have no such rights. During the period, if any, when stock awards are non-transferable or forfeitable, a participant is prohibited from selling, transferring, assigning, pledging, exchanging, hypothecating or otherwise encumbering or disposing of his or her shares of award stock.

The 2013 OIP authorizes our Compensation Committee to grant stock appreciation rights that provide the recipient with the right to receive, upon exercise of the stock appreciation right, cash, shares of common stock or a combination of the two. The amount that the recipient will receive upon exercise of the stock appreciation right generally will equal the excess of the fair market value of shares of our common stock on the date of exercise over the fair market value of shares of our common stock on the date of grant. Stock appreciation rights will become exercisable in accordance with terms determined by our Compensation Committee. Stock appreciation rights may be granted in tandem with an option grant or independently from an option grant. The term of a stock appreciation right cannot exceed 10 years from the date of grant.

The 2013 OIP also authorizes our Compensation Committee to grant performance-based awards. Performance-based awards are awards of options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, stock units, other equity-based awards or cash that are made subject to the achievement of performance goals over a performance period specified by our Compensation Committee. Our Compensation Committee determines the applicable performance period, the performance goals and such other conditions that apply to the performance-based award. Performance goals may relate to our financial performance, the participant’s performance or such other criteria as determined by our Compensation Committee.

Our Compensation Committee may grant dividend equivalents in connection with the grant of any equity-based award. Dividend equivalents may be paid currently or accrued as contingent cash obligations and may be payable in cash, shares of common stock or a combination of the two. Our Compensation Committee will determine the terms of any dividend equivalents. No dividend equivalent rights can be granted in tandem with an option or stock appreciation right.

Our Compensation Committee may grant other types of stock-based awards under the 2013 OIP. Other equity-based awards are payable in cash, shares of common stock or other equity, or a combination thereof, and may be restricted or unrestricted, as determined by our Compensation Committee. Any dividends paid on equity-based awards which vest or are earned based upon the achievement of performance goals shall not vest unless such performance goals are achieved. The terms and conditions that apply to other equity-based awards are determined by our Compensation Committee.

Award agreements for awards granted pursuant to the 2013 OIP provide for mandatory repayment by the recipient to us of any gain realized by the recipient to the extent the recipient is in violation of or in conflict with certain agreements with us (including but not limited to an employment or non-competition agreement) or upon termination for “cause” as defined in the 2013 OIP, applicable award agreement, or any other agreement between us and the grantee. Awards are also subject to mandatory repayment to the extent the grantee is or becomes subject to any clawback or recoupment right we may have or to the extent any law, rule or regulation imposes mandatory recoupment.

If the Company experiences a change in control in which outstanding awards that are not exercised prior to the change in control will not be assumed or continued by the surviving entity: (i) except for performance-based awards, all shares of restricted stock and restricted stock units will vest and the underlying shares of common stock and all dividend equivalent rights will be delivered immediately before the change in control; and (ii) either or both of the following actions will be taken: (a) all options and stock appreciation rights will become exercisable 15 days before the change in control and terminate upon the completion of the change in control, or (b) the Compensation Committee may elect, in its sole discretion to cash out all options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock and stock units before the change in control for an amount equal to, in the case of restricted stock or stock units, the formula or fixed price per share paid to stockholders pursuant to the change in control, in the case of options or stock appreciation rights, such formula or fixed price reduced by the option price or stock appreciation right price applicable to the award. In the case of performance-based awards denominated in shares of common stock, if more than half of the performance period has lapsed, the awards will be converted into shares of restricted stock or stock units based on actual performance to date. If less than half of the performance period has lapsed, or if actual performance is not determinable, the awards will be converted into shares of restricted stock or stock units assuming target performance has been achieved.

a person, entity or affiliated group (with certain exceptions, including for certain existing stockholders) acquires, in a transaction or series of transactions, 50% or more of the total combined voting power of our outstanding securities;

individuals who constitute the Board of Directors cease for any reason to constitute a majority of the Board of Directors, treating any individual whose election or nomination was approved by a majority of the incumbent directors as an incumbent director for this purpose;

the Company consolidates or merges with or into any other entity, or any other entity consolidates or merges with us, other than any such transaction in which the 100% of the total combined voting power of our outstanding securities remains with the holders of securities who held such voting power immediately prior to such transaction; or

The Compensation Committee will make appropriate adjustments in outstanding awards and the number of shares of common stock available for issuance under the 2013 OIP, including the individual limitations on awards, to reflect stock splits and other similar events.

Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code limits publicly-held companies to an annual deduction for U.S. federal income tax purposes of $1.0 million for compensation paid to each of their chief executive officer and their three highest compensated executive officers (other than the chief financial officer) determined at the end of each year, referred to as covered employees. However, performance-based compensation is excluded from this limitation. The 2013 OIP is designed to permit our Compensation Committee to grant awards that qualify as performance-based for purposes of satisfying the conditions of Section 162(m), but it is not required under the 2013 OIP that awards qualify for this exception.

the compensation must be paid solely on account of the attainment of one or more pre-established, objective performance goals;

the performance goal under which compensation is paid must be established by a compensation committee comprised solely of two or more directors who qualify as outside directors for purposes of the exception;

the material terms under which the compensation is to be paid must be disclosed to and subsequently approved by stockholders before payment is made in a separate vote; and

the compensation committee must certify in writing before payment of the compensation that the performance goals and any other material terms were in fact satisfied.

Under the 2013 OIP, one or more of the following business criteria, on a consolidated basis, and/or with respect to specified subsidiaries (except with respect to the total stockholder return and earnings per share criteria), will be used by the Compensation Committee in establishing performance goals:

earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and/or amortization as adjusted to exclude any one or more of the following:

sales or revenue growth, whether in general, by type of product or service, or by type of customer;

return measures, including return on assets, capital, investment, equity, sales or revenue;

free cash flow, defined as earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and/or amortization (as adjusted to exclude any one or more of the items that may be excluded pursuant to the performance measure specified in clause (viii) above) less capital expenditures;

financial ratios as provided in credit agreements of the Company and its subsidiaries;

attainment of measureable objectives with respect to compliant resource statements or technical reports;

completion of capital markets transactions as approved by the Board of Directors; or

The Board of Directors may amend, suspend or terminate the 2013 OIP at any time; provided that no amendment, suspension or termination may adversely impair the benefits of participants with outstanding awards without the participants’ consent or violate our plan’s prohibition on repricing. Our stockholders must approve any amendment if such approval is required under applicable law or stock exchange requirements. Our stockholders also must approve any amendment that changes the no-repricing provisions of the 2013 OIP. The 2013 OIP has a term that expires ten years after stockholder approval of the plan, but it may be earlier terminated by the Board of Directors at any time.

The table appearing on page 32 provides information as of December 31, 2016 with respect to the shares of the Company’s common stock that may be issued under the equity compensation plans of the Company. Our only active equity plan is our 2013 OIP.

Incentive Stock Options. The grant of an option will not be a taxable event for the grantee or for the Company. A grantee will not recognize taxable income upon exercise of an incentive stock option (except that the alternative minimum tax may apply), and any gain realized upon a disposition of our common stock received pursuant to the exercise of an incentive stock option will be taxed as long-term capital gain if the grantee holds the shares of common stock for at least two years after the date of grant and for one year after the date of exercise (the “holding period requirement”). We will not be entitled to any business expense deduction with respect to the exercise of an incentive stock option, except as discussed below.

For the exercise of an option to qualify for the foregoing tax treatment, the grantee generally must be our employee or an employee of a subsidiary from the date the option is granted through a date within three months before the date of exercise of the option.

If all of the foregoing requirements are met except the holding period requirement mentioned above, the grantee will recognize ordinary income upon the disposition of the common stock in an amount generally equal to the excess of the fair market value of the common stock at the time the option was exercised over the option exercise price (but not in excess of the gain realized on the sale). The balance of the realized gain, if any, will be capital gain. We will be allowed a business expense deduction to the extent the grantee recognizes ordinary income.

Non-Qualified Options. The grant of an option will not be a taxable event for the grantee or the Company. Upon exercising a non-qualified option, a grantee will recognize ordinary income in an amount equal to the difference

between the exercise price and the fair market value of the common stock on the date of exercise. Upon a subsequent sale or exchange of shares acquired pursuant to the exercise of a non-qualified option, the grantee will have taxable capital gain or loss, measured by the difference between the amount realized on the disposition and the tax basis of the shares of common stock (generally, the amount paid for the shares plus the amount treated as ordinary income at the time the option was exercised).

We will be entitled to a business expense deduction in the same amount and generally at the same time as the grantee recognizes ordinary income.

Restricted Stock. A grantee who is awarded restricted stock will not recognize any taxable income for federal income tax purposes in the year of the award, provided that the shares of common stock are subject to restrictions (that is, the restricted stock is nontransferable and subject to a substantial risk of forfeiture). The fair market value of the common stock on the date the restrictions lapse (less the purchase price, if any) will be treated as compensation income to the grantee and will be taxable in the year the restrictions lapse and dividends paid while the common stock is subject to restrictions will be subject to withholding taxes. We will be entitled to a business expense deduction in the same amount and generally at the same time as the grantee recognizes ordinary income.

Stock Units. There are no immediate tax consequences of receiving an award of stock units under the 2013 OIP. A grantee who is awarded stock units will be required to recognize ordinary income in an amount equal to the fair market value of shares issued to such grantee at the end of the restriction period or, if later, the payment date. We will be entitled to a business expense deduction in the same amount and generally at the same time as the grantee recognizes ordinary income.

Dividend Equivalent Rights. Participants who receive dividend equivalent rights will be required to recognize ordinary income in an amount distributed to the grantee pursuant to the award. We will be entitled to a business expense deduction in the same amount and generally at the same time as the grantee recognizes ordinary income.

Stock Appreciation Rights. There are no immediate tax consequences of receiving an award of stock appreciation rights under the 2013 OIP. Upon exercising a stock appreciation right, a grantee will recognize ordinary income in an amount equal to the difference between the exercise price and the fair market value of the common stock on the date of exercise. We will be entitled to a business expense deduction in the same amount and generally at the same time as the grantee recognizes ordinary income.

Approval of the amendment to the 2013 OIP requires an affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast on the proposal at the 2017 Annual Meeting. Abstentions and broker non-votes will not be counted towards, and will have no effect on, the vote total for this proposal. If no voting instructions are given, such shares will be voted “FOR” this proposal.

The Board of Directors knows of no other matters to be brought before the 2017 Annual Meeting. However, if other matters should come before the 2017 Annual Meeting, it is the intention of each person named in the proxy to vote such proxy in accordance with his own judgment on such matters.

The SEC has adopted rules that permit companies and intermediaries (e.g., brokers) to satisfy the delivery requirements for proxy statements and annual reports with respect to two or more stockholders sharing the same address by delivering a single proxy statement and annual report addressed to those stockholders. This process, which is commonly referred to as “householding,” potentially means extra convenience for stockholders and cost savings for companies.

A number of brokers with account holders who are URI stockholders may be householding our proxy materials, to the extent such stockholders have given their prior express or implied consent in accordance with SEC rules. A single Proxy Statement and Annual Report will be delivered to multiple stockholders sharing an address unless contrary instructions have been received from the affected stockholders. Once you have received notice from your broker that it will be householding communications to your address, householding will continue until you are notified otherwise or until you revoke your consent, which is deemed to be given unless you inform the broker otherwise when you receive the original notice of householding. If, at any time, you no longer wish to participate in householding and would prefer to receive separate proxy materials, please notify your broker to discontinue householding and direct your written request to receive a separate proxy statement and annual report to the Company at: Uranium Resources, Inc., Attention: Secretary, 6950 S. Potomac Street, Suite 300, Centennial, Colorado 80112, or by calling (303) 531-0470. Stockholders who currently receive multiple copies of the proxy materials at their address and would like to request householding of their communications should contact their broker.

In order to include a stockholder proposal in the Company’s proxy statement and form of proxy for the Annual Meeting to be held in 2018, we must receive the proposal at our principal executive offices, addressed to the Secretary, no later than January 23, 2018. Any stockholder proposal or director nomination submitted to us for consideration at next year’s Annual Meeting but which is not intended to be included in the related proxy statement and form of proxy, must be received between March 20, 2018 and April 19, 2018; otherwise, the proposal will be considered by us to be untimely and not properly brought before the meeting. Stockholders who wish to submit a proposal or a director nominee must meet the eligibility requirements of the SEC and comply with the requirements of our Bylaws and the SEC. In addition, pursuant to the rules and regulations of the SEC, the persons appointed as proxies for the annual meeting to be held in 2018 will have discretionary authority to vote any proxies they hold at such meeting on any matter for which the Company has not received notice by April 8, 2018.

In accordance with those certain resolutions adopted by the Board of Directors of Uranium Resources, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Corporation”), and the Board of Directors’ Compensation Committee and the approval by the stockholders of the Corporation at the Corporation’s 2017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, the 2013 Omnibus Incentive Plan (the “Plan”) of the Corporation is hereby amended as follows:

Section 4.1 of the Plan is hereby amended and restated in its entirety to increase the number of shares reserved for issuance under the Plan by 1,000,000 shares, as follows:

Subject to such additional shares of Stock as shall be available for Awards under the Plan pursuant to Section 4.2, and subject to adjustment pursuant to Section 17.1, the maximum number of shares of Stock available for Awards under the Plan shall be equal to the sum of (x) 1,083,333 shares of Stock plus (y) the number of shares of Stock available for awards under the Prior Plans as of the Effective Date plus (z) the number of shares of Stock related to awards outstanding under the Prior Plans as of the Effective Date which thereafter terminate by expiration, forfeiture, cancellation, or otherwise without the issuance of such shares. Such shares of Stock may be authorized and unissued shares of Stock or treasury shares of Stock or any combination of the foregoing, as may be determined from time to time by the Board or by the Committee. Any of the shares of Stock available for Awards under the Plan may be used for any type of Award under the Plan, and any or all of the shares of Stock available for Awards under the Plan shall be available for Awards pursuant to Incentive Stock Options.”

Unless otherwise expressly provided for in this First Amendment to the Plan (the “First Amendment”), all capitalized words, phrases, or defined terms used in this First Amendment will have the same meaning ascribed to them in the Plan.

Except as expressly set forth in this First Amendment, there have been no other changes or modifications to the Plan, and the plan remains otherwise unchanged and in full force and effect.

Uranium Resources, Inc. (the “Company”) sets forth herein the terms of its 2013 Omnibus Incentive Plan (the “Plan”), as follows:

The Plan is intended to (a) provide eligible persons with an incentive to contribute to the success of the Company and to operate and manage the Company’s business in a manner that will provide for the Company’s long-term growth and profitability to benefit its stockholders and other important stakeholders, including its employees and customers, and (b) provide a means of obtaining, rewarding and retaining key personnel. To this end, the Plan provides for the grant of awards of stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, stock units, unrestricted stock, dividend equivalent rights, performance shares and other performance-based awards, other equity-based awards, and cash bonus awards. Any of these awards may, but need not, be made as performance incentives to reward the holders of such awards for the achievement of performance goals in accordance with the terms of the Plan. Stock options granted under the Plan may be non-qualified stock options or incentive stock options, as provided herein.

For purposes of interpreting the Plan documents (including the Plan and Award Agreements), the following definitions shall apply:

“Affiliate” means any company or other entity that controls, is controlled by or is under common control with the Company within the meaning of Rule 405 of Regulation C under the Securities Act, including any Subsidiary. For purposes of grants of Options or Stock Appreciation Rights, an entity may not be considered an Affiliate unless the Company holds a “controlling interest” in such entity within the meaning of Treasury Regulation Section 1.414(c)-2(b)(2)(i), provided that (a) except as specified in clause (b) below, an interest of “at least 50 percent” shall be used instead of an interest of “at least 80 percent” in each case where “at least 80 percent” appears in Treasury Regulation Section 1.414(c)-2(b)(2)(i) and (b) where the grant of Options or Stock Appreciation Rights is based upon a legitimate business criterion, an interest of “at least 20 percent” shall be used instead of an interest of “at least 80 percent” in each case where “at least 80 percent” appears in Treasury Regulation Section 1.414(c)-2(b)(2)(i).

“Applicable Laws” means the legal requirements relating to the Plan and the Awards under (a) applicable provisions of the corporate, securities, tax and other laws, rules, regulations and government orders of any jurisdiction applicable to Awards granted to residents therein and (b) the rules of any Stock Exchange on which the Stock is listed.

“Award” means a grant under the Plan of an Option, a Stock Appreciation Right, Restricted Stock, a Stock Unit, Unrestricted Stock, a Dividend Equivalent Right, a Performance Share or other Performance-Based Award, an Other Equity-Based Award, or cash.

“Award Agreement” means the agreement between the Company and a Grantee that evidences and sets out the terms and conditions of an Award.

“Award Stock” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 17.3(a)(ii).

“Benefit Arrangement” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 15.

“Cause” means, with respect to any Grantee, as determined by the Committee and unless otherwise provided in an applicable agreement between such Grantee and the Company or an Affiliate, (a) gross negligence or willful misconduct in connection with the performance of duties; (b) conviction of a criminal offense (other than minor traffic offenses); or (c) material breach of any term of any employment, consulting or other services, confidentiality, intellectual property or non-competition agreements, if any, between such Grantee and the Company or an Affiliate. Any determination by the Committee whether an event constituting Cause shall have occurred shall be final, binding and conclusive.

“Capital Stock” means, with respect to any Person, any and all shares, interests, participations or other equivalents (however designated, whether voting or non-voting) in equity of such Person, whether outstanding on the Effective Date or issued thereafter, including, without limitation, all common stock, par value $.001 per share, of the Company.

a “Person” or “group” (within the meaning of Sections 13(d) and 14(d)(2) of the Exchange Act), other than the Existing Stockholders, becomes the “beneficial owner” (as defined in Rule 13d-3 under the Exchange Act) of more than fifty percent (50%) of the total voting power of the Voting Stock of the Company, on a Fully Diluted Basis;

individuals who on the Effective Date constitute the Board (together with any new Directors whose election by such Board or whose nomination by such Board for election by the stockholders of the Company was approved by a vote of at least a majority of the members of such Board then in office who either were members of such Board on the Effective Date or whose election or nomination for election was previously so approved) cease for any reason to constitute a majority of the members of such Board then in office;

the Company consolidates with, or merges with or into, any Person, or any Person consolidates with, or merges with or into, the Company, other than any such transaction in which the holders of securities that represented one hundred percent (100%) of the Voting Stock of the Company immediately prior to such transaction (or other securities into which such securities are converted as part of such merger or consolidation transaction) own directly or indirectly at least a majority of the voting power of the Voting Stock of the surviving Person in such merger or consolidation transaction immediately after such transaction; or

there is consummated any direct or indirect sale, lease, transfer, conveyance or other disposition (other than by way of merger or consolidation), in one transaction or a series of related transactions, of all or substantially all of the assets of the Company and its Subsidiaries, taken as a whole, to any “Person” or “group” (within the meaning of Sections 13(d) and 14(d)(2) of the Exchange Act).

“Code” means the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, as now in effect or as hereafter amended, and any successor thereto. References in the Plan to any Code Section shall be deemed to include, as applicable, regulations promulgated under such Code Section.

“Covered Employee” means a Grantee who is a “covered employee” within the meaning of Code Section 162(m)(3).

“Disability” means the inability of a Grantee to perform each of the essential duties of such Grantee’s position by reason of a medically determinable physical or mental impairment which is potentially permanent in character or which can be expected to last for a continuous period of not less than 12 months; provided that, with respect to rules regarding expiration of an Incentive Stock Option following termination of a Grantee’s

Service, Disability shall mean the inability of such Grantee to engage in any substantial gainful activity by reason of a medically determinable physical or mental impairment which can be expected to result in death or which has lasted or can be expected to last for a continuous period of not less than 12 months.

“Dividend Equivalent Right” means a right, granted to a Grantee pursuant to Section 13, to receive cash, Stock, other Awards or other property equal in value to dividends or other periodic payments paid or made with respect to a specified number of shares of Stock.

“Employee” means, as of any date of determination, an employee (including an officer) of the Company or an Affiliate.

“Effective Date” means June 4, 2013, the date on which the Plan was approved by the Company’s stockholders.

“Exchange Act” means the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as now in effect or as hereafter amended.

“Existing Stockholders” means Resource Capital Fund V L.P. and RMB Australia Holdings Limited.

“Fair Market Value” means the fair market value of a share of Stock for purposes of the Plan, which shall be determined as of any Grant Date as follows:

If on such Grant Date the shares of Stock are listed on a Stock Exchange, or are publicly traded on another established securities market (a “Securities Market”), the Fair Market Value of a share of Stock shall be the closing price of the Stock as reported on such Stock Exchange or such Securities Market (provided that, if there is more than one such Stock Exchange or Securities Market, the Committee shall designate the appropriate Stock Exchange or Securities Market for purposes of the Fair Market Value determination). If there is no such reported closing price on such Grant Date, the Fair Market Value of a share of Stock shall be the closing price of the Stock on the next preceding day on which any sale of Stock shall have been reported on such Stock Exchange or such Securities Market.

If on such Grant Date the shares of Stock are not listed on a Stock Exchange or publicly traded on a Securities Market, the Fair Market Value of a share of Stock shall be the value of the Stock as determined by the Committee by the reasonable application of a reasonable valuation method, in a manner consistent with Code Section 409A.

Notwithstanding this Section 2.21 or Section 18.3, for purposes of determining taxable income and the amount of the related tax withholding obligation pursuant to Section 18.3, the Fair Market Value will be determined by the Company using any reasonable method; provided, further, that for any shares of Stock subject to an Award that are sold by or on behalf of a Grantee on the same date on which such shares may first be sold pursuant to the terms of the related Award Agreement, the Fair Market Value of such shares shall be the sale price of such shares on such date (or if sales of such shares are effectuated at more than one sale price, the weighted average sale price of such shares on such date).

“Family Member” means, with respect to any Grantee as of any date of determination, (a) a person who is a spouse, former spouse, child, stepchild, grandchild, parent, stepparent, grandparent, niece, nephew, mother-in-law, father-in-law, son-in-law, daughter-in-law, brother, sister, brother-in-law, or sister-in-law, including adoptive relationships, of such Grantee, (b) any person sharing such Grantee’s household (other than a tenant or employee), (c) a trust in which any one or more of the persons specified in clauses (a) and (b) above (and such Grantee) own more than fifty percent (50%) of the beneficial interest, (d) a foundation in which any one or more of the persons specified in clauses (a) and (b) above (and such Grantee) control the management of assets, and (e) any other entity in which one or more of the persons specified in clauses (a) and (b) above (and such Grantee) own more than fifty percent (50%) of the voting interests.

“Fully Diluted Basis” means, as of any date of determination, the sum of (x) the number of shares of Voting Stock outstanding as of such date of determination plus (y) the number of shares of Voting Stock issuable upon the exercise, conversion or exchange of all then-outstanding warrants, options, convertible Capital Stock or indebtedness, exchangeable Capital Stock or indebtedness, or other rights exercisable for or convertible or exchangeable into, directly or indirectly, shares of Voting Stock, whether at the time of issue or upon the passage of time or upon the occurrence of some future event, and whether or not in the money as of such date of determination

“Grant Date” means, as determined by the Committee, the latest to occur of (a) the date as of which the Committee approves the Award, (b) the date on which the recipient of an Award first becomes eligible to receive an Award under Section 6 hereof (e.g., in the case of a new hire, the first date on which such new hire performs any Service), or (c) such subsequent date specified by the Committee in the corporate action approving the Award.

“Incentive Stock Option” means an “incentive stock option” within the meaning of Code Section 422, or the corresponding provision of any subsequently enacted tax statute, as amended from time to time.

“Non-qualified Stock Option” means an Option that is not an Incentive Stock Option.

“Option” means an option to purchase one or more shares of Stock pursuant to the Plan.

“Option Price” means the exercise price for each share of Stock subject to an Option.

“Other Equity-Based Award” means an Award representing a right or other interest that may be denominated or payable in, valued in whole or in part by reference to, or otherwise based on, or related to, Stock, other than an Option, a Stock Appreciation Right, Restricted Stock, a Stock Unit, Unrestricted Stock, a Dividend Equivalent Right or a Performance Share.

“Parachute Payment” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 15(a).

“Performance-Based Award” means an Award of Options, Stock Appreciation Rights, Restricted Stock, Stock Units, Performance Shares, Other Equity-Based Awards or cash made subject to the achievement of performance goals (as provided in Section 14) over a Performance Period specified by the Committee.

“Performance-Based Compensation” means compensation under an Award that is intended to satisfy the requirements of Code Section 162(m) for “qualified performance-based compensation” paid to Covered Employees. Notwithstanding the foregoing, nothing in the Plan shall be construed to mean that an Award which does not satisfy the requirements for “qualified performance-based compensation” within the meaning of and pursuant to Code Section 162(m) does not constitute performance-based compensation for other purposes, including the purposes of Code Section 409A.

“Performance Measures” means measures as specified in Section 14.6.4 on which the performance goals under Performance-Based Awards are based and which are approved by the Company’s stockholders pursuant to, and to the extent required by, the Plan in order to qualify such Performance-Based Awards as Performance-Based Compensation.

“Performance Period” means the period of time during which the performance goals under Performance-Based Awards must be met in order to determine the degree of payout and/or vesting with respect to any such Performance-Based Awards.

“Performance Shares” means a Performance-Based Award representing a right or other interest that may be denominated or payable in, valued in whole or in part by reference to, or otherwise based on, or related to, Stock, made subject to the achievement of performance goals (as provided in Section 14) over a Performance Period of up to ten (10) years.

“Person” means an individual, a corporation, a partnership, a limited liability company, an association, a trust or any other entity or organization, including a government or political subdivision or an agency or instrumentality thereof.

“Plan” means this 2013 Omnibus Incentive Plan, as amended from time to time.

“Prior Plans” means the Company’s Amended and Restated 1995 Stock Incentive Plan, the 2004 Stock Incentive Plan, the Amended and Restated 2004 Directors’ Stock Option and Restricted Stock Plan, and the 2007 Restricted Stock Plan.

“Reporting Person” means a person who is required to file reports under Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act, or any successor provision.

“Restricted Period” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 10.2.

“Restricted Stock” means shares of Stock awarded to a Grantee pursuant to Section 10.

“Securities Act” means the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, as now in effect or as hereafter amended.

“Service” means service qualifying a Grantee as a Service Provider to the Company or an Affiliate. Unless otherwise provided in the applicable Award Agreement, a Grantee’s change in position or duties shall not result in interrupted or terminated Service, so long as such Grantee continues to be a Service Provider to the Company or an Affiliate. Subject to the preceding sentence, any determination by the Committee whether a termination of Service shall have occurred for purposes of the Plan shall be final, binding and conclusive. If a Service Provider’s employment or other service relationship is with an Affiliate and the applicable entity ceases to be an Affiliate, a termination of Service shall be deemed to have occurred when such entity ceases to be an Affiliate unless the Service Provider transfers his or her employment or other service relationship to the Company or any other Affiliate.

“Service Provider” means an Employee, officer, or director of the Company or an Affiliate, or a consultant or adviser (who is a natural person) to the Company or an Affiliate currently providing services to the Company or an Affiliate.

“Stock” means the common stock, par value $0.001 per share, of the Company, or any security which shares of Stock may be changed into or for which shares of Stock may be exchanged as provided in Section 17.1.

“Stock Appreciation Right” or “SAR” means a right granted to a Grantee pursuant to Section 9.

“Stock Exchange” means The NASDAQ Stock Exchange LLC or another established national or regional stock exchange on which the Company’s equity securities may be listed.

“Stock Unit” means a bookkeeping entry representing the equivalent of one (1) share of Stock awarded to a Grantee pursuant to Section 10 that (a) is not subject to vesting or (b) is subject to time-based vesting, but not to performance-based vesting. A Stock Unit may also be referred to as a restricted stock unit.

“Subsidiary” means any corporation (other than the Company) or non-corporate entity with respect to which the Company owns, directly or indirectly, fifty percent (50%) or more of the total combined voting power of all classes of stock, membership interests or other ownership interests of any class or kind ordinarily having the power to vote for the directors, managers or other voting members of the governing body of such corporation or non-corporate entity. In addition, any other entity may be designated by the Committee as a Subsidiary, provided that (a) such entity could be considered as a subsidiary according to generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America, and (b) in the case of an Award of Options or Stock Appreciation Rights, such Award would be considered to be granted in respect of “service recipient stock” under Code Section 409A.

“Substitute Award” means an Award granted upon assumption of, or in substitution for, outstanding awards previously granted under a compensatory plan by a business entity acquired or to be acquired by the Company or an Affiliate or with which the Company or an Affiliate has combined or will combine.

“Ten Percent Stockholder” means a natural person who owns more than ten percent (10%) of the total combined voting power of all classes of outstanding voting securities of the Company, the Company’s parent (if any) or any of the Company’s Subsidiaries. In determining stock ownership, the attribution rules of Code Section 424(d) shall be applied.

“Unrestricted Stock” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 11.

“Voting Stock” means, with respect to any Person, Capital Stock of any class or kind ordinarily having the power to vote for the election of directors, managers or other voting members of the governing body of such Person.

The Committee shall administer the Plan and shall have such powers and authorities related to the administration of the Plan as are consistent with the Company’s certificate of incorporation and bylaws and Applicable Laws. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, the Committee shall have full power and authority to take all actions and to make all determinations required or provided for under the Plan, any Award or any Award Agreement, and shall have full power and authority to take all such other actions and make all such other determinations not inconsistent with the specific terms and provisions of the Plan which the Committee deems to be necessary or appropriate to the administration of the Plan, any Award or any Award Agreement. All such actions and determinations shall be made by (a) the affirmative vote of a majority of the members of the Committee present at a meeting at which a quorum is present, or (b) the unanimous consent of the members of the Committee executed in writing in accordance with the Company’s certificate of incorporation and bylaws and Applicable Laws. Unless otherwise expressly determined by the Board, the Committee shall have the authority to interpret and construe all provisions of the Plan, any Award and any Award Agreement, and any such interpretation or construction, and any other determination contemplated to be made under the Plan or any Award Agreement, by the Committee shall be final, binding and conclusive whether or not expressly provided for in any provision of the Plan, such Award or such Award Agreement.

In the event that the Plan, any Award or any Award Agreement provides for any action to be taken by the Board or any determination to be made by the Board, such action may be taken or such determination may be made by the Committee constituted in accordance with this Section 3.1 if the Board has delegated the power and authority to do so to such Committee.

The Committee shall be a committee composed of not fewer than two directors of the Company designated by the Board to administer the Plan. Each member of the Committee shall be a “Non-Employee Director” within the meaning of Rule 16b-3 under the Exchange Act, an “outside director” within the meaning of Code Section 162(m)(4)(C)(i) and, for so long as the Stock is listed on The NASDAQ Stock Exchange LLC, an “independent director” within the meaning of NASDAQ Listing Rule 5605(a)(2) (or, in each case, any successor term or provision); provided that any action taken by the Committee shall be valid and effective whether or not members of the Committee at the time of such action are later determined not to have satisfied the requirements for membership set forth in this Section 3.1.2 or otherwise provided in any charter of the Committee. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, the Committee may be the Compensation Committee of the Board or a subcommittee thereof if the Compensation Committee of the Board or such subcommittee satisfies the foregoing requirements.

The Board also may appoint one or more committees of the Board, each composed of one or more directors of the Company who need not be Outside Directors, which may administer the Plan with respect to Grantees who are not “officers” as defined in Rule 16a-1(f) under the Exchange Act or directors of the Company, may grant Awards under the Plan to such Grantees, and may determine all terms of such Awards, subject to the requirements of Rule 16b-3 under the Exchange Act, Code Section 162(m) and, for so long as the Stock is listed on The NASDAQ Stock Exchange LLC, the rules of such Stock Exchange.

To the extent permitted by Applicable Laws, the Committee may by resolution delegate some or all of its authority with respect to the Plan and Awards to the Chief Executive Officer of the Company and/or any other officer of the Company designated by the Committee, provided that the Committee may not delegate its authority hereunder (a) to make Awards to directors of the Company, (b) to make Awards to Employees who are (i) “officers” as defined in Rule 16a-1(f) under the Exchange Act, (ii) Covered Employees or (iii) officers of the Company who are delegated authority by the Committee pursuant to this Section 3.1.4, or (c) to interpret the Plan or any Award. Any delegation hereunder shall be subject to the restrictions and limits that the Committee specifies at the time of such delegation or thereafter. Nothing in the Plan shall be construed as obligating the Committee to delegate authority to any officer of the Company, and the Committee may at any time rescind the authority delegated to an officer of the Company appointed hereunder and delegate authority to one or more other officers of the Company. At all times, an officer of the Company delegated authority pursuant to this Section 3.1.4 shall serve in such capacity at the pleasure of the Committee. Any action undertaken by any such officer of the Company in accordance with the Committee’s delegation of authority shall have the same force and effect as if undertaken directly by the Committee, and any reference in the Plan to the “Committee” shall, to the extent consistent with the terms and limitations of such delegation, be deemed to include a reference to each such officer.

The Board from time to time may exercise any or all of the powers and authorities related to the administration and implementation of the Plan, as set forth in Section 3.1 and other applicable provisions of the Plan, as the Board shall determine, consistent with the Company’s certificate of incorporation and bylaws and Applicable Laws.

Subject to the other terms and conditions of the Plan, the Committee shall have full and final authority to:

establish the terms and conditions of each Award (including the Option Price of any Option or the purchase price for Restricted Stock), the nature and duration of any restriction or condition (or provision for lapse thereof) relating to the vesting, exercise, transfer, or forfeiture of an Award or the shares of Stock subject thereto, the treatment of an Award in the event of a Change in Control (subject to applicable agreements), and any terms or conditions that may be necessary to qualify Options as Incentive Stock Options;

subject to the limitation on repricing in Section 3.4, amend, modify or supplement the terms of any outstanding Award, which authority shall include the authority, in order to effectuate the purposes of the Plan but without amending the Plan, to make Awards or to modify outstanding Awards made to eligible natural persons who are foreign nationals or are natural persons who are employed outside the United States to reflect differences in local law, tax policy, or custom, provided that, notwithstanding the foregoing, no amendment, modification or supplement of the terms of any outstanding Award shall, without the consent of the Grantee thereof, impair such Grantee’s rights under such Award.

The Committee shall have the right, in its discretion, to make Awards in substitution or exchange for any award granted under another compensatory plan of the Company, an Affiliate, or any business entity acquired or to be acquired by the Company or an Affiliate or with which the Company or an Affiliate has combined or will combine.

The Committee may reserve the right in an Award Agreement to cause a forfeiture of the gain realized by a Grantee with respect to an Award thereunder on account of actions taken by, or failed to be taken by, such Grantee in violation or breach of or in conflict with any (a) employment agreement, (b) non-competition agreement, (c) agreement prohibiting solicitation of Employees or clients of the Company or an Affiliate, (d) confidentiality obligation with respect to the Company or an Affiliate, (e) Company policy or procedure, (f) other agreement, or (g) any other obligation of such Grantee to the Company or an Affiliate, as and to the extent specified in such Award Agreement. The Committee may annul an outstanding Award if the Grantee thereof is an Employee of the Company or an Affiliate and is terminated for Cause as defined in the Plan or the applicable Award Agreement or for “cause” as defined in any other agreement between the Company or such Affiliate and such Grantee, as applicable.

Any Award granted pursuant to the Plan shall be subject to mandatory repayment by the Grantee to the Company to the extent the Grantee is, or in the future becomes, subject to (a) any Company “clawback” or recoupment policy that is adopted to comply with the requirements of any Applicable Law, rule or regulation, or otherwise, or (b) any law, rule or regulation which imposes mandatory recoupment, under circumstances set forth in such law, rule or regulation.

Except in connection with a corporate transaction involving the Company (including, without limitation, any stock dividend, distribution (whether in the form of cash, shares of Stock, other securities or other property), stock split, extraordinary cash dividend, recapitalization, change in control, reorganization, merger, consolidation, split-up, spin-off, combination, repurchase or exchange of shares of Stock or other securities or similar transaction), the Company may not, without obtaining stockholder approval: (a) amend the terms of outstanding Options or SARs to reduce the exercise price of such outstanding Options or SARs; (b) cancel outstanding Options or SARs in exchange for or substitution of Options or SARs with an exercise price that is less than the exercise price of the original Options or SARs; or (c) cancel outstanding Options or SARs with an exercise price above the current stock price in exchange for cash or other securities.

The Committee may permit or require the deferral of any payment pursuant to any Award into a deferred compensation arrangement, subject to such rules and procedures as it may establish, which may include provisions for the payment or crediting of interest or Dividend Equivalent Rights and, in connection therewith, provisions for converting such credits into Stock Units and for restricting deferrals to comply with hardship distribution rules affecting tax-qualified retirement plans subject to Code Section 401(k)(2)(B)(IV), provided that no Dividend Equivalent Rights may be granted in connection with, or related to, an Award of Options or SARs. Any such deferrals shall be made in a manner that complies with Code Section 409A, including, if applicable, with respect to when a Separation from Service occurs as defined under Section 409A.

No member of the Board or the Committee shall be liable for any action or determination made in good faith with respect to the Plan or any Award or Award Agreement.

Notwithstanding any provision of the Plan to the contrary, the ownership of the shares of Stock issued under the Plan may be evidenced in such a manner as the Committee, in its sole discretion, deems appropriate, including by book-entry or direct registration (including transaction advices) or the issuance of one or more share certificates.

In connection with mergers, reorganizations, separations, or other transactions to which Code Section 424(a) applies, the Committee shall have the right to cause the Company to assume awards previously granted under a compensatory plan by another business entity that is a party to such transaction and to substitute Awards under the Plan for such awards. The number of shares of Stock available for Awards under the Plan pursuant to Section 4.1 shall be increased by the number of shares of Stock subject to any such assumed awards and substitute Awards. Shares available for awards under a shareholder-approved plan of a business entity that is a party to such transaction (as appropriately adjusted, if necessary, to reflect such transaction) may be used for Awards under the Plan and shall not reduce the number of shares of Stock otherwise available for issuance under the Plan, subject to applicable rules of any Stock Exchange on which the Stock is listed.

Shares of Stock subject to an Award shall be counted as used as of the Grant Date.

Any shares of Stock, including shares of Stock acquired through dividend reinvestment pursuant to Section 10.4, that are subject to an Award shall be counted against the share

issuance limit set forth in Section 4.1 as one (1) share for every one (1) share of Stock subject to such Award. The number of shares of Stock subject to an Award of SARs shall be counted against the share issuance limit set forth in Section 4.1 as one (1) share of Stock for every one (1) share of Stock subject to such Award regardless of the number of shares of Stock actually issued to settle such SARs upon the exercise thereof. The target number of shares issuable under a Performance Share grant shall be counted against the share issuance limit set forth in Section 4.1 as of the Grant Date, but such number shall be adjusted to equal the actual number of shares issued upon settlement of the Performance Shares to the extent different from such target number of shares. An Award that, by its terms, cannot be settled in shares of Stock shall not count against the share limit set forth in Section 4.1.

Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in Section 4.1, any shares of Stock related to Awards under the Plan or the Prior Plans which terminate by expiration, forfeiture, cancellation, or otherwise without the issuance of such shares shall be available again for issuance under the Plan.

The number of shares of Stock available for issuance under the Plan shall not be increased by the number of shares of Stock (i) tendered or withheld or subject to an Award surrendered in connection with the purchase of shares of Stock upon exercise of an Option as provided in Section 12.2, (ii) deducted or delivered from payment of an Award in connection with the Company’s tax withholding obligations as provided in Section 18.3 or (iii) purchased by the Company with proceeds from Option exercises.

The Plan shall be effective as of the Effective Date. Following the Effective Date, no awards shall be made under the Prior Plans. Notwithstanding the foregoing, shares of Stock reserved under the Prior Plans to settle awards, including performance-based awards, which are made under the Prior Plans prior to the Effective Date may be issued and delivered following the Effective Date to settle such awards.

The Plan shall terminate automatically ten (10) years after the Effective Date and may be terminated on any earlier date as provided in Section 5.3.

The Board may, at any time and from time to time, amend, suspend or terminate the Plan as to any shares of Stock as to which Awards have not been made. The effectiveness of any amendment to the Plan shall be contingent on approval of such amendment by the Company’s stockholders to the extent provided by the Board or required by Applicable Laws (including the rules of any Stock Exchange on which the Stock is then listed), provided that no amendment shall be made to the no-repricing provisions of Section 3.4 or the Option pricing provisions of Section 8.1 without the approval of the Company’s stockholders. No amendment, suspension or termination of the Plan shall impair rights or obligations under any Award theretofore made under the Plan without the consent of the Grantee thereof.

Subject to this Section 6, Awards may be made under the Plan to (i) any Service Provider, as the Committee shall determine and designate from time to time and (ii) any other individual whose participation in the Plan is determined to be in the best interests of the Company by the Committee.

During any time when the Company has a class of equity security registered under Section 12 of the Exchange Act:

the maximum number of shares of Stock subject to Options or SARs that may be granted under the Plan in a calendar year to any person eligible for an Award under Section 6 is two hundred thousand (200,000) shares;

the maximum number of shares of Stock that may be granted under the Plan, other than pursuant to Options or SARs, in a calendar year to any person eligible for an Award under Section 6 is two hundred thousand (200,000) shares; and

the maximum amount that may be paid as a cash-settled Performance-Based Award for a Performance Period of twelve (12) months or less to any person eligible for an Award shall be four hundred thousand dollars ($400,000) and the maximum amount that may be paid as a cash-settled Performance-Based Award for a Performance Period of greater than twelve (12) months to any person eligible for an Award shall also be four hundred thousand dollars ($400,000).

The preceding limitations in this Section 6.2 are subject to adjustment as provided in Section 17.

Subject to Section 3.4, Awards granted under the Plan may, in the discretion of the Committee, be granted either alone or in addition to, in tandem with, or in substitution or exchange for, (a) any other Award, (b) any award granted under another plan of the Company, an Affiliate, or any business entity that has been a party to a transaction with the Company or an Affiliate, or (c) any other right of a Grantee to receive payment from the Company or an Affiliate. Such additional, tandem and substitute or exchange Awards may be granted at any time. If an Award is granted in substitution or exchange for another Award, or for an award granted under another plan of the Company, an Affiliate, or any business entity that has been a party to a transaction with the Company or an Affiliate, the Committee shall require the surrender of such other Award or award under such other plan in consideration for the grant of such substitute or exchange Award. In addition, Awards may be granted in lieu of cash compensation, including in lieu of cash payments under other plans of the Company or an Affiliate. Notwithstanding Section 8.1 and Section 9.1, but subject to Section 3.4, the Option Price of an Option or the SAR Price of a SAR that is a Substitute Award may be less than one hundred percent (100%) of the Fair Market Value of a share of Stock on the original Grant Date; provided that such Option Price or SAR Price is determined in accordance with the principles of Code Section 424 for any Incentive Stock Option and consistent with Code Section 409A for any other Option or SAR.

Each Award granted pursuant to the Plan shall be evidenced by an Award Agreement, which shall be in such form or forms as the Committee shall from time to time determine. Award Agreements employed under the Plan from time to time or at the same time need not contain similar provisions, but shall be consistent with the terms of the Plan. Each Award Agreement evidencing an Award of Options shall specify whether such Options are intended to be Non-qualified Stock Options or Incentive Stock Options, and, in the absence of such specification, such Options shall be deemed to constitute Non-qualified Stock Options.

The Option Price of each Option shall be fixed by the Committee and stated in the Award Agreement evidencing such Option. Except in the case of Substitute Awards, the Option Price of each Option shall be at least the Fair Market Value of one (1) share of Stock on the Grant Date; provided that in the event that a

Grantee is a Ten Percent Stockholder, the Option Price of an Option granted to such Grantee that is intended to be an Incentive Stock Option shall be not less than one hundred ten percent (110%) of the Fair Market Value of one (1) share of Stock on the Grant Date. In no case shall the Option Price of any Option be less than the par value of a share of Stock.

Subject to Sections 8.3 and 17.3, each Option granted under the Plan shall become exercisable at such times and under such conditions as shall be determined by the Committee and stated in the Award Agreement, in another agreement with the Grantee or otherwise in writing, provided that no Option shall be granted to persons who are entitled to overtime under applicable state or federal laws, that will vest or be exercisable within a six-month period starting on the Grant Date.

Each Option granted under the Plan shall terminate, and all rights to purchase shares of Stock thereunder shall cease, upon the expiration of ten (10) years from the Grant Date of such Option, or under such circumstances and on such date prior thereto as is set forth in the Plan or as may be fixed by the Committee and stated in the Award Agreement relating to such Option; provided that in the event that the Grantee is a Ten Percent Stockholder, an Option granted to such Grantee that is intended to be an Incentive Stock Option shall not be exercisable after the expiration of five (5) years from its Grant Date; and provided, further, that, to the extent deemed necessary or appropriate by the Committee to reflect differences in local law, tax policy, or custom with respect to any Option granted to a Grantee who is a foreign national or is a natural person who is employed outside the United States, such Option may terminate, and all rights to purchase shares of Stock thereunder may cease, upon the expiration of such period longer than ten (10) years from the Grant Date of such Option as the Committee shall determine.

Each Award Agreement with respect to the grant of an Option shall set forth the extent to which the Grantee thereof, if at all, shall have the right to exercise such Option following termination of such Grantee’s Service. Such provisions shall be determined in the sole discretion of the Committee, need not be uniform among all Options issued pursuant to the Plan, and may reflect distinctions based on the reasons for termination of Service.

Notwithstanding any other provision of the Plan, in no event may any Option be exercised, in whole or in part, after the occurrence of an event referred to in Section 17 which results in the termination of such Option.

Subject to the terms of Section 12 and Section 18.3, an Option that is exercisable may be exercised by the Grantee’s delivery to the Company or its designee or agent of notice of exercise on any business day, at the Company’s principal office or the office of such designee or agent, on the form specified by the Company and in accordance with any additional procedures specified by the Committee. Such notice shall specify the number of shares of Stock with respect to which such Option is being exercised and shall be accompanied by payment in full of the Option Price of the shares of Stock for which such Option is being exercised plus the amount (if any) of federal and/or other taxes which the Company may, in its judgment, be required to withhold with respect to the exercise of such Option.

Unless otherwise stated in the applicable Award Agreement, a Grantee or other person holding or exercising an Option shall have none of the rights of a stockholder of the Company (for example, the right to receive

cash or dividend payments or distributions attributable to the shares of Stock subject to such Option, to direct the voting of the shares of Stock subject to such Option, or to receive notice of any meeting of the Company’s stockholders) until the shares of Stock subject thereto are fully paid and issued to such Grantee or other person. Except as provided in Section 17, no adjustment shall be made for dividends, distributions or other rights with respect to any shares of Stock subject to an Option for which the record date is prior to the date of issuance of such shares of Stock.

Promptly after the exercise of an Option by a Grantee and the payment in full of the Option Price with respect thereto, such Grantee shall be entitled to receive such evidence of such Grantee’s ownership of the shares of Stock subject to such Option as shall be consistent with Section 3.7.

Except as provided in Section 8.10, during the lifetime of a Grantee of an Option, only such Grantee (or, in the event of such Grantee’s legal incapacity or incompetency, such Grantee’s guardian or legal representative) may exercise such Option. Except as provided in Section 8.10, no Option shall be assignable or transferable by the Grantee to whom it is granted, other than by will or the laws of descent and distribution.

If authorized in the applicable Award Agreement and by the Committee, in its sole discretion, a Grantee may transfer, not for value, all or part of an Option which is not an Incentive Stock Option to any Family Member. For the purpose of this Section 8.10, a transfer “not for value” is a transfer which is (a) a gift, (b) a transfer under a domestic relations order in settlement of marital property rights or (c) unless Applicable Laws do not permit such transfer, a transfer to an entity in which more than fifty percent (50%) of the voting interests are owned by Family Members (and/or the Grantee) in exchange for an interest in such entity. Following a transfer under this Section 8.10, any such Option shall continue to be subject to the same terms and conditions as were applicable immediately prior to such transfer, and the shares of Stock acquired pursuant to such Option shall be subject to the same restrictions with respect to transfers of such shares of Stock as would have applied to the Grantee thereof. Subsequent transfers of transferred Options shall be prohibited except to Family Members of the original Grantee in accordance with this Section 8.10 or by will or the laws of descent and distribution. The provisions of Section 8.4 relating to termination of Service shall continue to be applied with respect to the original Grantee of the Option, following which such Option shall be exercisable by the transferee only to the extent, and for the periods specified, in Section 8.4.

An Option shall constitute an Incentive Stock Option only (a) if the Grantee of such Option is an Employee of the Company or any corporate Subsidiary, (b) to the extent specifically provided in the related Award Agreement and (c) to the extent that the aggregate Fair Market Value (determined at the time such Option is granted) of the shares of Stock with respect to which all Incentive Stock Options held by such Grantee become exercisable for the first time during any calendar year (under the Plan and all other plans of the Company and its Affiliates) does not exceed one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000). Except to the extent provided in the regulations under Code Section 422, this limitation shall be applied by taking Options into account in the order in which they were granted.

If any Grantee shall make any disposition of shares of Stock issued pursuant to the exercise of an Incentive Stock Option under the circumstances provided in Code Section 421(b) (relating to certain disqualifying dispositions), such Grantee shall notify the Company of such disposition within ten (10) days thereof.

A SAR shall confer on the Grantee to whom it is granted a right to receive, upon exercise thereof, the excess of (x) the Fair Market Value of one (1) share of Stock on the date of exercise over (y) the per share exercise price of such SAR (the “SAR Price”) as determined by the Committee. The Award Agreement for a SAR shall specify the SAR Price, which shall be no less than the Fair Market Value of one (1) share of Stock on the Grant Date of such SAR. SARs may be granted in tandem with all or part of an Option granted under the Plan or at any subsequent time during the term of such Option, in combination with all or any part of any other Award or without regard to any Option or other Award; provided that a SAR that is granted subsequent to the Grant Date of a related Option must have a SAR Price that is no less than the Fair Market Value of one (1) share of Stock on the Grant Date of such SAR.

The Committee shall determine, on the Grant Date or thereafter, the time or times at which and the circumstances under which a SAR may be exercised in whole or in part (including based on achievement of performance goals and/or future Service requirements), the time or times at which SARs shall cease to be or become exercisable following termination of Service or upon other conditions, the method of exercise, method of settlement, form of consideration payable in settlement, method by or forms in which shares of Stock shall be delivered or deemed to be delivered to Grantees, whether or not a SAR shall be granted in tandem or in combination with any other Award, and any and all other terms and conditions of any SAR.

Each SAR granted under the Plan shall terminate, and all rights thereunder shall cease, upon the expiration of ten (10) years from the Grant Date of such SAR or under such circumstances and on such date prior thereto as is set forth in the Plan or as may be fixed by the Committee and stated in the Award Agreement relating to such SAR.

Except as provided in Section 9.5, during the lifetime of a Grantee of a SAR, only the Grantee (or, in the event of such Grantee’s legal incapacity or incompetency, such Grantee’s guardian or legal representative) may exercise such SAR. Except as provided in Section 9.5, no SAR shall be assignable or transferable by the Grantee to whom it is granted, other than by will or the laws of descent and distribution.

If authorized in the applicable Award Agreement and by the Committee, in its sole discretion, a Grantee may transfer, not for value, all or part of a SAR to any Family Member. For the purpose of this Section 9.5, a transfer “not for value” is a transfer which is (a) a gift, (b) a transfer under a domestic relations order in settlement of marital property rights or (c) unless Applicable Laws do not permit such transfer, a transfer to an entity in which more than fifty percent (50%) of the voting interests are owned by Family Members (and/or the Grantee) in exchange for an interest in such entity. Following a transfer under this Section 9.5, any such SAR shall continue to be subject to the same terms and conditions as were in effect immediately prior to such transfer, and shares of Stock acquired pursuant to a SAR shall be subject to the same restrictions on transfers of such shares of Stock as would have applied to the Grantee or such SAR. Subsequent transfers of transferred SARs shall be prohibited except to Family Members of the original Grantee in accordance with this Section 9.5 or by will or the laws of descent and distribution.

Awards of Restricted Stock and Stock Units may be made for consideration or for no consideration, other than the par value of the shares of Stock, which shall be deemed paid by past Service or, if so provided in the related Award Agreement or a separate agreement, the promise by the Grantee to perform future Service to the Company or an Affiliate.

At the time a grant of Restricted Stock or Stock Units is made, the Committee may, in its sole discretion, (a) establish a period of time during which such Restricted Stock or Stock Units are unvested (a “Restricted Period”) and (b) prescribe restrictions in addition to or other than the expiration of the Restricted Period, including the achievement of corporate or individual performance goals, which may be applicable to all or any portion of such Restricted Stock or Stock Units as provided in Section 14. Awards of Restricted Stock and Stock Units may not be sold, transferred, assigned, pledged or otherwise encumbered or disposed of during the Restricted Period or prior to the satisfaction of any other restrictions prescribed by the Committee with respect to such Awards.

Pursuant to Section 3.7, to the extent that ownership of Restricted Stock is evidenced by a book-entry registration or direct registration (including transaction advices), such registration shall be notated to evidence the restrictions imposed on such Award of Restricted Stock under the Plan and the applicable Award Agreement. Subject to Section 3.7 and the immediately following sentence, the Company may issue, in the name of each Grantee to whom Restricted Stock has been granted, share certificates representing the total number of shares of Restricted Stock granted to the Grantee, as soon as reasonably practicable after the Grant Date of such Restricted Stock. The Committee may provide in an Award Agreement with respect to an Award of Restricted Stock that either (a) the Secretary of the Company shall hold such share certificates for such Grantee’s benefit until such time as such shares of Restricted Stock are forfeited to the Company or the restrictions applicable thereto lapse and such Grantee shall deliver a stock power to the Company with respect to each share certificate, or (b) such share certificates shall be delivered to such Grantee, provided that such share certificates shall bear legends that comply with applicable securities laws and regulations and make appropriate reference to the restrictions imposed on such Award of Restricted Stock under the Plan and such Award Agreement.

Unless the Committee otherwise provides in an Award Agreement, holders of Restricted Stock shall have the right to vote such shares of Restricted Stock and the right to receive any dividends declared or paid with respect to such shares of Restricted Stock. The Committee may provide that any dividends paid on Restricted Stock must be reinvested in shares of Stock, which may or may not be subject to the same vesting conditions and restrictions as the vesting conditions and restrictions applicable to such Restricted Stock. Dividends paid on Restricted Stock which vests or is earned based upon the achievement of performance goals shall not vest unless such performance goals for such Restricted Stock are achieved, and if such performance goals are not achieved, the Grantee of such Restricted Stock shall promptly forfeit and repay to the Company such dividend payments. All stock distributions, if any, received by a Grantee with respect to Restricted Stock as a result of any stock split, stock dividend, combination of stock, or other similar transaction shall be subject to the vesting conditions and restrictions applicable to such Restricted Stock.

Holders of Stock Units shall have no rights as stockholders of the Company (for example, the right to receive cash or dividend payments or distributions attributable to the shares of Stock subject to such Stock Units, to direct the voting of the shares of Stock subject to such Stock Units, or to receive notice of any meeting of the

Company’s stockholders). The Committee may provide in an Award Agreement evidencing a grant of Stock Units that the holder of such Stock Units shall be entitled to receive, upon the Company’s payment of a cash dividend on its outstanding shares of Stock, a cash payment for each such Stock Unit which is equal to the per-share dividend paid on such shares of Stock. Dividends paid on Stock Units which vest or are earned based upon the achievement of performance goals shall not vest unless such performance goals for such Stock Units are achieved. Such Award Agreement also may provide that such cash payment shall be deemed reinvested in additional Stock Units at a price per unit equal to the Fair Market Value of a share of Stock on the date on which such cash dividend is paid. Such cash payments paid in connection with Stock Units which vest or are earned based upon the achievement of performance goals shall not vest unless such performance goals for such Stock Units are achieved, and if such performance goals are not achieved, the Grantee of such Stock Units shall promptly forfeit and repay to the Company such cash payments.

A holder of Stock Units shall have no rights other than those of a general unsecured creditor of the Company. Stock Units represent unfunded and unsecured obligations of the Company, subject to the terms and conditions of the applicable Award Agreement.

Unless the Committee otherwise provides in an Award Agreement, in another agreement with the Grantee or otherwise in writing after such Award Agreement is entered into, but prior to termination of Grantee’s Service, upon the termination of such Grantee’s Service, any Restricted Stock or Stock Units held by such Grantee that have not vested, or with respect to which all applicable restrictions and conditions have not lapsed, shall immediately be deemed forfeited. Upon forfeiture of such Restricted Stock or Stock Units, the Grantee thereof shall have no further rights with respect thereto, including any right to vote such Restricted Stock or any right to receive dividends with respect to such Restricted Stock or Stock Units.

The Grantee of an Award of Restricted Stock or vested Stock Units shall be required, to the extent required by Applicable Laws, to purchase such Restricted Stock or the shares of Stock subject to such vested Stock Units from the Company at a purchase price equal to the greater of (x) the aggregate par value of the shares of Stock represented by such Restricted Stock or such vested Stock Units or (y) the purchase price, if any, specified in the Award Agreement relating to such Restricted Stock or such vested Stock Units. Such purchase price shall be payable in a form provided in Section 12 or, in the sole discretion of the Committee, in consideration for Service rendered or to be rendered to the Company or an Affiliate.

Upon the expiration or termination of any Restricted Period and the satisfaction of any other conditions prescribed by the Committee, including, but not limited to, any delayed delivery period, the restrictions applicable to Restricted Stock or Stock Units settled in shares of Stock shall lapse, and, unless otherwise provided in the applicable Award Agreement, a book-entry or direct registration (including transaction advices) or a share certificate evidencing ownership of such shares of Stock shall, consistent with Section 3.7, be issued, free of all such restrictions, to the Grantee thereof or such Grantee’s beneficiary or estate, as the case may be. Neither the Grantee, nor the Grantee’s beneficiary or estate, shall have any further rights with regard to a Stock Unit once the shares of Stock represented by such Stock Unit have been delivered in accordance with this Section 10.8.

TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF UNRESTRICTED STOCK AWARDS AND OTHER EQUITY-BASED AWARDS

The Committee may, in its sole discretion, grant (or sell at the par value of a share of Stock or at such other higher purchase price as shall be determined by the Committee) an Award to any Grantee pursuant to which such Grantee may receive shares of Stock free of any restrictions (“Unrestricted Stock”) under the Plan. Unrestricted Stock Awards may be granted or sold to any Grantee as provided in the immediately preceding sentence in respect of past Service or, if so provided in the related Award Agreement or a separate agreement, the promise by the Grantee to perform future Service, to the Company or an Affiliate or other valid consideration, or in lieu of, or in addition to, any cash compensation due to such Grantee.

The Committee may, in its sole discretion, grant Awards in the form of Other Equity-Based Awards, as deemed by the Committee to be consistent with the purposes of the Plan. Awards granted pursuant to this Section 11.2 may be granted with vesting, value and/or payment contingent upon the achievement of one or more performance goals. The Committee shall determine the terms and conditions of Other Equity-Based Awards at the Grant Date or thereafter. Any dividends paid on Other Equity-Based Awards which vest or are earned based upon the achievement of performance goals shall not vest unless such performance goals for such Other Equity-Based Awards are achieved. Unless the Committee otherwise provides in an Award Agreement, in another agreement with the Grantee, or otherwise in writing after such Award Agreement is issued, upon the termination of a Grantee’s Service, any Other Equity-Based Awards held by such Grantee that have not vested, or with respect to which all applicable restrictions and conditions have not lapsed, shall immediately be deemed forfeited. Upon forfeiture of any Other Equity-Based Award, the Grantee thereof shall have no further rights with respect to such Other Equity-Based Award.

Payment of the Option Price for the shares of Stock purchased pursuant to the exercise of an Option or the purchase price, if any, for Restricted Stock shall be made in cash or in cash equivalents acceptable to the Company.

To the extent that the applicable Award Agreement so provides, payment of the Option Price for shares of Stock purchased pursuant to the exercise of an Option or the purchase price, if any, for Restricted Stock may be made all or in part through the tender or attestation to the Company of shares of Stock, which shall be valued, for purposes of determining the extent to which such Option Price or purchase price has been paid thereby, at their Fair Market Value on the date of such tender or attestation.

To the extent permitted by Applicable Laws and to the extent the Award Agreement so provides, payment of the Option Price for shares of Stock purchased pursuant to the exercise of an Option may be made all or in part by delivery (on a form acceptable to the Committee) of an irrevocable direction to a licensed securities broker acceptable to the Company to sell shares of Stock and to deliver all or part of the proceeds of such sale to the Company in payment of such Option Price and any withholding taxes described in Section 18.3, or, with the consent of the Company, by issuing the number of shares of Stock equal in value to the difference between such Option Price and the Fair Market Value of the shares of Stock subject to the portion of such Option being exercised.

To the extent the Award Agreement so provides and/or unless otherwise specified in an Award Agreement, payment of the Option Price for shares of Stock purchased pursuant to exercise of an Option or the purchase price, if any, for Restricted Stock may be made in any other form that is consistent with Applicable Laws, including (a) Service by the Grantee thereof to the Company or an Affiliate and (b) by withholding shares of Stock that would otherwise vest or be issuable in an amount equal to the Option Price or purchase price and the required tax withholding amount.

A Dividend Equivalent Right is an Award entitling the recipient thereof to receive credits based on cash distributions that would have been paid on the shares of Stock specified in such Dividend Equivalent Right (or other Award to which such Dividend Equivalent Right relates) if such shares of Stock had been issued to and held by the recipient of such Dividend Equivalent Right as of the record date. A Dividend Equivalent Right may be granted hereunder to any Grantee, provided that no Dividend Equivalent Rights may be granted in connection with, or related to, an Award of Options or SARs. The terms and conditions of Dividend Equivalent Rights shall be specified in the Award Agreement therefor. Dividend equivalents credited to the holder of a Dividend Equivalent Right may be paid currently (with or without being subject to forfeiture or a repayment obligation) or may be deemed to be reinvested in additional shares of Stock, which may thereafter accrue additional Dividend Equivalent Rights (with or without being subject to forfeiture or a repayment obligation). Any such reinvestment shall be at the Fair Market Value thereof on the date of such reinvestment. Dividend Equivalent Rights may be settled in cash or shares of Stock or a combination thereof, in a single installment or in multiple installments, all as determined in the sole discretion of the Committee. A Dividend Equivalent Right granted as a component of another Award may provide that such Dividend Equivalent Right shall be settled upon exercise, settlement, or payment of, or lapse of restrictions on, such other Award, and that such Dividend Equivalent Right shall expire or be forfeited or annulled under the same conditions as such other Award. A Dividend Equivalent Right granted as a component of another Award also may contain terms and conditions which are different from the terms and conditions of such other Award, provided that Dividend Equivalent Rights credited pursuant to a Dividend Equivalent Right granted as a component of another Award which vests or is earned based upon the achievement of performance goals shall not vest unless such performance goals for such underlying Award are achieved, and if such performance goals are not achieved, the Grantee of such Dividend Equivalent Rights shall promptly forfeit and repay to the Company payments made in connection with such Dividend Equivalent Rights.

Unless the Committee otherwise provides in an Award Agreement, in another agreement with the Grantee, or otherwise in writing after such Award Agreement is issued, a Grantee’s rights in all Dividend Equivalent Rights shall automatically terminate upon such Grantee’s termination of Service for any reason.

Subject to the terms and provisions of the Plan, the Committee, at any time and from time to time, may grant Performance-Based Awards to a Plan participant in such amounts and upon such terms as the Committee shall determine.

Each grant of a Performance-Based Award shall have an actual or target number of shares of Stock or initial value that is established by the Committee at the time of grant. The Committee shall set performance

goals in its discretion which, depending on the extent to which they are achieved, shall determine the value and/or number of shares of Stock subject to a Performance-Based Award that will be paid out to the Grantee thereof.

Subject to the terms of the Plan, in particular Section 14.6.3, after the applicable Performance Period has ended, the Grantee of Performance-Based Awards shall be entitled to receive a payout on the number of the Performance-Based Awards or value earned by such Grantee over such Performance Period.

Payment of earned Performance-Based Awards shall be made in the manner described in the applicable Award Agreement as determined by the Committee. Subject to the terms of the Plan, the Committee, in its sole discretion, may pay earned Performance-Based Awards in the form of cash or shares of Stock (or a combination thereof) equal to the value of such earned Performance-Based Awards and shall pay the Awards that have been earned at the close of the applicable Performance Period, or as soon as reasonably practicable after the Committee has determined that the performance goal or goals relating thereto have been achieved; provided that, unless specifically provided in the Award Agreement for such Awards, such payment shall occur no later than the 15th day of the third month following the end of the calendar year in which such Performance Period ends. Any shares of Stock paid out under such Performance-Based Awards may be granted subject to any restrictions deemed appropriate by the Committee. The determination of the Committee with respect to the form of payout of such Performance-Based Awards shall be set forth in the Award Agreement therefor.

The right of a Grantee to exercise or receive a grant or settlement of any Performance-Based Award, and the timing thereof, may be subject to such performance conditions as may be specified by the Committee. The Committee may use such business criteria and other measures of performance as it may deem appropriate in establishing any performance conditions. If and to the extent required under Code Section 162(m), any power or authority relating to an Award intended to qualify under Code Section 162(m) shall be exercised by the Committee and not by the Board.

If and to the extent that the Committee determines that a Performance-Based Award to be granted to a Grantee should constitute “qualified performance-based compensation” for purposes of Code Section 162(m), the grant, exercise and/or settlement of such Award shall be contingent upon achievement of pre-established performance goals and other terms set forth in this Section 14.6.

The performance goals for Performance-Based Awards shall consist of one or more business criteria and a targeted level or levels of performance with respect to each of such criteria, as specified by the Committee consistent with this Section 14.6. Performance goals shall be objective and shall otherwise meet the requirements of Code Section 162(m), including the requirement that the level or levels of performance targeted by the Committee result in the achievement of performance goals being “substantially uncertain.” The Committee may determine that such Awards shall be granted, exercised and/or settled upon achievement of any single performance goal or of two (2) or more performance goals. Performance goals may differ for Awards granted to any one Grantee or to different Grantees.

Performance goals for any Performance-Based Award shall be established not later than the earlier of (a) 90 days after the beginning of any Performance Period applicable to such Award, and (b) the date on which twenty-five percent (25%) of any Performance Period applicable to such Award has expired, or at such other date as

may be required or permitted for compensation payable to a Covered Employee to constitute Performance-Based Compensation.

Payment of Performance-Based Awards shall be in cash, shares of Stock, or other Awards, including an Award that is subject to additional Service-based vesting, as determined in the sole discretion of the Committee. The Committee may, in its sole discretion, reduce the amount of a payment otherwise to be made in connection with such Awards. The Committee shall specify the circumstances in which such Performance-Based Awards shall be paid or forfeited in the event of termination of Service by the Grantee prior to the end of a Performance Period or settlement of such Awards. In the event payment of the Performance-Based Award is made in the form of another Award subject to Service-based vesting, the Committee shall specify the circumstances in which the payment Award will be paid or forfeited in the event of a termination of Service.

The performance goals upon which the payment or vesting of a Performance-Based Award to a Covered Employee that is intended to qualify as Performance-Based Compensation may be conditioned shall be limited to the following Performance Measures, with or without adjustment:

earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and/or amortization as adjusted to exclude any one or more of the following:

sales or revenue growth, whether in general, by type of product or service, or by type of customer;

return measures, including return on assets, capital, investment, equity, sales or revenue;

free cash flow, defined as earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and/or amortization (as adjusted to exclude any one or more of the items that may be

excluded pursuant to the Performance Measure specified in clause (h) above) less capital expenditures;

financial ratios as provided in credit agreements of the Company and its subsidiaries;

attainment of measurable objectives with respect to compliant resource statements or technical reports;

Performance under any of the foregoing Performance Measures (a) may be used to measure the performance of (i) the Company and its Subsidiaries and other Affiliates as a whole, (ii) the Company, any Subsidiary, and/or any other Affiliate or any combination thereof, or (iii) any one or more business units of the Company, any Subsidiary, and/or any other Affiliate, as the Committee, in its sole discretion, deems appropriate and (b) may be compared to the performance of one or more other companies or one or more published or special indices designated or approved by the Committee for such comparison, as the Committee, in its sole discretion, deems appropriate. In addition, the Committee, in its sole discretion, may select performance under the Performance Measure specified in clause (e) above for comparison to performance under one or more stock market indices designated or approved by the Committee. The Committee also shall have the authority to provide for accelerated vesting of any Performance-Based Award based on the achievement of performance goals pursuant to the Performance Measures specified in this Section 14.

The Committee may provide in any Performance-Based Award that any evaluation of performance may include or exclude any of the following events that occur during a Performance Period: (a) asset write-downs; (b) litigation or claims, judgments or settlements; (c) the effect of changes in tax laws, accounting principles or other laws or provisions affecting reported results; (d) any reorganization or restructuring events or programs; (e) extraordinary, non-core, non-operating or non-recurring items; (f) acquisitions or divestitures; and (g) foreign exchange gains and losses. To the extent such inclusions or exclusions affect Awards to Covered Employees that are intended to qualify as Performance-Based Compensation, such inclusions or exclusions shall be prescribed in a form that meets the requirements of Code Section 162(m) for deductibility.

The Committee shall have the sole discretion to adjust Awards that are intended to qualify as Performance-Based Compensation, either on a formula or discretionary basis, or on any combination thereof, as the Committee determines consistent with the requirements of Code Section 162(m) for deductibility.

In the event that Applicable Laws change to permit Committee discretion to alter the governing Performance Measures without obtaining stockholder approval of such changes, the Committee shall have sole discretion to make such changes without obtaining stockholder approval, provided that the exercise of such discretion shall not be inconsistent with the requirements of Code Section 162(m). In addition, in the event that the Committee determines that it is advisable to grant Awards that shall not qualify as Performance-Based Compensation, the Committee may make such grants without satisfying the requirements of Code Section 162(m) and base vesting on Performance Measures other than those set forth in Section 14.6.4.

It is the intent of the Company that Performance-Based Awards under Section 14.6 granted to persons who are designated by the Committee as likely to be Covered Employees within the meaning of Code Section 162(m) and the regulations promulgated thereunder shall, if so designated by the Committee, constitute “qualified performance-based compensation” within the meaning of Code Section 162(m). Accordingly, the terms of Section 14.6, including the definitions of Covered Employee and other terms used therein, shall be interpreted in a manner consistent with Code Section 162(m). If any provision of the Plan or any agreement relating to any such Performance-Based Award does not comply or is inconsistent with the requirements of Code Section 162(m), such provision shall be construed or deemed amended to the extent necessary to conform to such requirements.

If any Grantee is a “disqualified individual,” as defined in Code Section 280G(c), then, notwithstanding any other provision of the Plan or of any other agreement, contract, or understanding heretofore or hereafter entered into by such Grantee with the Company or an Affiliate, except an agreement, contract, or understanding that expressly addresses Code Section 280G or Code Section 4999 (an “Other Agreement”), and notwithstanding any formal or informal plan or other arrangement for the direct or indirect provision of compensation to the Grantee (including groups or classes of Grantees or beneficiaries of which the Grantee is a member), whether or not such compensation is deferred, is in cash, or is in the form of a benefit to or for the Grantee (a “Benefit Arrangement”), any right of the Grantee to any exercise, vesting, payment, or benefit under the Plan shall be reduced or eliminated:

to the extent that such right to exercise, vesting, payment, or benefit, taking into account all other rights, payments, or benefits to or for the Grantee under the Plan, all Other Agreements, and all Benefit Arrangements, would cause any exercise, vesting, payment, or benefit to the Grantee under the Plan to be considered a “parachute payment” within the meaning of Code Section 280G(b)(2) as then in effect (a “Parachute Payment”); and

if, as a result of receiving such Parachute Payment, the aggregate after-tax amounts received by the Grantee from the Company under the Plan, all Other Agreements, and all Benefit Arrangements would be less than the maximum after-tax amount that could be received by the Grantee without causing any such payment or benefit to be considered a Parachute Payment.

The Company shall accomplish such reduction by first reducing or eliminating any cash payments (with the payments to be made furthest in the future being reduced first), then by reducing or eliminating any accelerated vesting of Performance-Based Awards, then by reducing or eliminating any accelerated vesting of Options or SARs, then by reducing or eliminating any accelerated vesting of Restricted Stock or Stock Units, then by reducing or eliminating any other remaining Parachute Payments.

The Company shall not be required to offer, sell or issue any shares of Stock under any Award, whether pursuant to the exercise of an Option or SAR or otherwise, if the offer, sale or issuance of such shares of Stock would constitute a violation by the Grantee, the Company or an Affiliate, or any other person, of any provision of Applicable Laws, including any federal or state securities laws or regulations. If at any time the Company shall determine, in its discretion, that the listing, registration or qualification of any shares of Stock subject to an Award upon any securities exchange or under any governmental regulatory body is necessary or desirable as a condition of, or in connection with, the offering, issuance, sale or purchase of shares of Stock in connection with any Award, no shares of Stock may be offered, issued or sold to the Grantee or any other person under such Award, whether pursuant to the exercise of an Option or SAR or otherwise, unless such listing, registration or qualification shall have been effected or obtained free of any conditions not acceptable to the Company, and any delay caused thereby shall in no way affect the date of termination of such Award. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, upon the exercise of any Option or any SAR that may be settled in shares of Stock or the delivery of any shares of Stock underlying an Award, unless a registration statement under the Securities Act is in effect with respect to the shares of Stock subject to such Award, the Company shall not be required to offer, sell or issue such shares of Stock unless the Committee shall have received evidence satisfactory to it that the Grantee or any other person exercising such Option or SAR or accepting delivery of such shares may acquire such shares of Stock pursuant to an exemption from registration under the Securities Act. Any determination in this connection by the Committee shall be final, binding, and conclusive. The Company may register, but shall in no event be obligated to register, any shares of Stock or other securities issuable pursuant to the Plan pursuant to the Securities Act. The Company shall not be obligated to take any affirmative action in order to cause the exercise of an Option or a SAR or the issuance of shares of Stock or other securities issuable pursuant to the Plan or any Award to comply with any Applicable Laws. As to any jurisdiction that expressly imposes the requirement that an Option or SAR that may be settled in shares of Stock shall not be exercisable until the shares of Stock subject to such Option or SAR are registered under the securities laws thereof or are exempt from such registration, the exercise of such Option or SAR under circumstances in which the laws of such jurisdiction apply shall be deemed conditioned upon the effectiveness of such registration or the availability of such an exemption.

During any time when the Company has a class of equity security registered under Section 12 of the Exchange Act, it is the intention of the Company that Awards pursuant to the Plan and the exercise of Options and SARs granted hereunder that would otherwise be subject to Section 16(b) of the Exchange Act shall qualify for the exemption provided by Rule 16b-3 under the Exchange Act. To the extent that any provision of the Plan or action by the Committee does not comply with the requirements of such Rule 16b-3, such provision or action shall be deemed inoperative with respect to such Awards to the extent permitted by Applicable Laws and deemed advisable by the Committee, and shall not affect the validity of the Plan. In the event that such Rule 16b-3 is revised or replaced, the Board may exercise its discretion to modify the Plan in any respect necessary or advisable in its judgment to satisfy the requirements of, or to permit the Company to avail itself of the benefits of, the revised exemption or its replacement.

If the number of outstanding shares of Stock is increased or decreased or the shares of Stock are changed into or exchanged for a different number of shares or kind of capital stock or other securities of the Company on account of any recapitalization, reclassification, stock split, reverse stock split, spin-off, combination of stock, exchange of stock, stock dividend or other distribution payable in capital stock, or other increase or decrease in shares of Stock effected without receipt of consideration by the Company occurring after the Effective Date, the number and kinds of shares of stock for which grants of Options and other Awards may be made under the Plan, including the share limits set forth in Section 6.2, shall be adjusted proportionately and accordingly by the Committee. In addition, the number and kind of shares of stock for which Awards are outstanding shall be adjusted

proportionately and accordingly by the Committee so that the proportionate interest of the Grantee therein immediately following such event shall, to the extent practicable, be the same as immediately before such event. Any such adjustment in outstanding Options or SARs shall not change the aggregate Option Price or SAR Price payable with respect to shares that are subject to the unexercised portion of such outstanding Options or SARs, as applicable, but shall include a corresponding proportionate adjustment in the per share Option Price or SAR Price, as the case may be. The conversion of any convertible securities of the Company shall not be treated as an increase in shares effected without receipt of consideration. Notwithstanding the foregoing, in the event of any distribution to the Company’s stockholders of securities of any other entity or other assets (including an extraordinary dividend, but excluding a non-extraordinary dividend, declared and paid by the Company) without receipt of consideration by the Company, the Board or the Committee constituted pursuant to Section 3.1.2 shall, in such manner as the Board or the Committee deems appropriate, adjust (a) the number and kind of shares of stock subject to outstanding Awards and/or (b) the aggregate and per share Option Price of outstanding Options and the aggregate and per share SAR Price of outstanding SARs as required to reflect such distribution.

Reorganization in Which the Company Is the Surviving Entity Which Does not Constitute a Change in Control.

Subject to Section 17.3, if the Company shall be the surviving entity in any reorganization, merger or consolidation of the Company with one or more other entities which does not constitute a Change in Control, any Option or SAR theretofore granted pursuant to the Plan shall pertain to and apply to the securities to which a holder of the number of shares of Stock subject to such Option or SAR would have been entitled immediately following such reorganization, merger or consolidation, with a corresponding proportionate adjustment of the per share Option Price or SAR Price so that the aggregate Option Price or SAR Price thereafter shall be the same as the aggregate Option Price or SAR Price of the shares of Stock remaining subject to the Option or SAR as in effect immediately prior to such reorganization, merger, or consolidation. Subject to any contrary language in an Award Agreement or in another agreement with the Grantee, or otherwise set forth in writing, any restrictions applicable to such Award shall apply as well to any replacement shares received by the Grantee as a result of such reorganization, merger or consolidation. In the event of any reorganization, merger or consolidation of the Company referred to in this Section 17.2, Performance-Based Awards shall be adjusted (including any adjustment to the Performance Measures applicable to such Awards deemed appropriate by the Committee) so as to apply to the securities that a holder of the number of shares of Stock subject to the Performance-Based Awards would have been entitled to receive immediately following such reorganization, merger or consolidation.

Except as otherwise provided in the applicable Award Agreement or in another agreement with the Grantee, or as otherwise set forth in writing, upon the occurrence of a Change in Control in which outstanding Options, SARs, Restricted Stock, Stock Units, Dividend Equivalent Rights or Other Equity-Based Awards are not being assumed or continued, the following provisions shall apply to such Award, to the extent not assumed or continued:

in each case with the exception of Performance-Based Awards, all outstanding Restricted Stock shall be deemed to have vested, all Stock Units shall be deemed to have vested and the shares of Stock subject thereto shall be delivered, and all Dividend Equivalent Rights shall be deemed to have vested and the shares of Stock subject thereto shall be delivered, immediately prior to the occurrence of such Change in Control, and either of the following two actions shall be taken:

fifteen (15) days prior to the scheduled consummation of such Change in Control, all Options and SARs outstanding hereunder shall become immediately exercisable and shall remain exercisable for a period of fifteen (15) days, which exercise shall be effective upon such consummation; or

the Committee may elect, in its sole discretion, to cancel any outstanding Awards of Options, SARs, Restricted Stock, Stock Units and/or Dividend Equivalent Rights and pay or deliver, or cause to be paid or delivered, to the

holder thereof an amount in cash or securities having a value (as determined by the Committee acting in good faith), in the case of Restricted Stock or Stock Units and Dividend Equivalent Rights (for shares of Stock subject thereto), equal to the formula or fixed price per share paid to holders of shares of Stock pursuant to such Change in Control and, in the case of Options or SARs, equal to the product of the number of shares of Stock subject to such Options or SARs (the “Award Stock”) multiplied by the amount, if any, by which (x) the formula or fixed price per share paid to holders of shares of Stock pursuant to such transaction exceeds (y) the Option Price or SAR Price applicable to such Award Stock.

For Performance-Based Awards denominated in Stock, if less than half of the Performance Period has lapsed, such Awards shall be treated as though target performance has been achieved. If at least half the Performance Period has lapsed, actual performance to date shall be determined as of a date reasonably proximal to the date of consummation of the Change in Control as determined by the Committee in its sole discretion, and that level of performance thus determined shall be treated as achieved immediately prior to occurrence of the Change in Control. For purposes of the preceding sentence, if, based on the discretion of the Committee, actual performance is not determinable, the Awards shall be treated as though target performance has been achieved. After application of this Section 17.3(b), if any Awards arise from application of this Section 17, such Awards shall be settled under the applicable provision of Section 17.3(a).

Other Equity-Based Awards shall be governed by the terms of the applicable Award Agreement.

With respect to the Company’s establishment of an exercise window, (A) any exercise of an Option or SAR during the fifteen (15)-day period referred to above shall be conditioned upon the consummation of the applicable Change in Control and shall be effective only immediately before the consummation thereof, and (B) upon consummation of any Change in Control, the Plan and all outstanding but unexercised Options and SARs shall terminate. The Committee shall send notice of an event that shall result in such a termination to all natural persons and entities who hold Options and SARs not later than the time at which the Company gives notice thereof to its stockholders.

Except as otherwise provided in the applicable Award Agreement or in another agreement with the Grantee, or as otherwise set forth in writing, upon the occurrence of a Change in Control in which outstanding Options, SARs, Restricted Stock, Stock Units, Dividend Equivalent Rights or Other Equity-Based Awards are being assumed or continued, the following provisions shall apply to such Award, to the extent assumed or continued:

The Plan and the Options, SARs, Restricted Stock, Stock Units, Dividend Equivalent Rights and Other Equity-Based Awards granted under the Plan shall continue in the manner and under the terms so provided in the event of any Change in Control to the extent that provision is made in writing in connection with such Change in Control for the assumption or continuation of such Options, SARs, Restricted Stock, Stock Units, Dividend Equivalent Rights and Other Equity-Based Awards, or for the substitution for such Options, SARs, Restricted Stock, Stock Units, Dividend Equivalent Rights and Other Equity-Based Awards of new common stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, common stock units, dividend equivalent rights and other equity-based awards relating to the stock of a successor entity, or a parent or subsidiary thereof, with appropriate adjustments as to the number of shares (disregarding any consideration that is not common stock) and option and stock appreciation rights exercise prices. In the event an Award is assumed, continued or substituted upon the consummation of any Change in Control and the employment of such Grantee with the Company or an Affiliate is terminated without Cause within one year following the consummation of such Change in Control, such Award shall be fully vested and may be exercised in full, to the extent applicable, beginning on the date of such termination and for the one-year period immediately following such termination or for such longer period as the Committee shall determine.

Adjustments under this Section 17 related to shares of Stock or other securities of the Company shall be made by the Committee, whose determination in that respect shall be final, binding and conclusive. No fractional shares or other securities shall be issued pursuant to any such adjustment, and any fractions resulting from any such adjustment shall be eliminated in each case by rounding downward to the nearest whole share. The Committee may provide in the applicable Award Agreement at the time of grant, in another agreement with the Grantee, or otherwise in writing at any time thereafter with the consent of the Grantee, for different provisions to apply to an Award in place of those provided in Sections 17.1, 17.2, 17.3 and 17.4. This Section 17 shall not limit the Committee’s ability to provide for alternative treatment of Awards outstanding under the Plan in the event of a change in control event involving the Company that is not a Change in Control.

The making of Awards pursuant to the Plan shall not affect or limit in any way the right or power of the Company to make adjustments, reclassifications, reorganizations, or changes of its capital or business structure or to merge, consolidate, dissolve, or liquidate, or to sell or transfer all or any part of its business or assets (including all or any part of the business or assets of any Subsidiary or other Affiliate) or engage in any other transaction or activity.

No provision in the Plan or in any Award or Award Agreement shall be construed to confer upon any individual the right to remain in the employ or Service of the Company or an Affiliate, or to interfere in any way with any contractual or other right or authority of the Company or an Affiliate either to increase or decrease the compensation or other payments to any natural person or entity at any time, or to terminate any employment or other relationship between any natural person or entity and the Company or an Affiliate. In addition, notwithstanding anything contained in the Plan to the contrary, unless otherwise stated in the applicable Award Agreement, in another agreement with the Grantee, or otherwise in writing, no Award granted under the Plan shall be affected by any change of duties or position of the Grantee thereof, so long as such Grantee continues to provide Service. The obligation of the Company to pay any benefits pursuant to the Plan shall be interpreted as a contractual obligation to pay only those amounts provided herein, in the manner and under the conditions prescribed herein. The Plan and Awards shall in no way be interpreted to require the Company to transfer any amounts to a third-party trustee or otherwise hold any amounts in trust or escrow for payment to any Grantee or beneficiary under the terms of the Plan.

Neither the adoption of the Plan nor the submission of the Plan to the stockholders of the Company for approval shall be construed as creating any limitations upon the right and authority of the Board to adopt such other incentive compensation arrangements (which arrangements may be applicable either generally to a class or classes of individuals or specifically to a particular individual or particular individuals) as the Board in its discretion determines desirable.

The Company or an Affiliate, as the case may be, shall have the right to deduct from payments of any kind otherwise due to a Grantee any federal, state, or local taxes of any kind required by law to be withheld with respect to the vesting of or other lapse of restrictions applicable to an Award or upon the issuance of any shares of Stock upon the exercise of an Option or pursuant to any other Award. At the time of such vesting, lapse, or exercise, the Grantee shall pay in cash to the Company or an Affiliate, as the case may be, any amount that the Company or such Affiliate may reasonably determine to be necessary to satisfy such withholding obligation; provided that if there is a same-day sale of shares of Stock subject to an Award, the Grantee shall pay such

withholding obligation on the day on which such same-day sale is completed. Subject to the prior approval of the Company or an Affiliate, which may be withheld by the Company or such Affiliate, as the case may be, in its sole discretion, the Grantee may elect to satisfy such withholding obligation, in whole or in part, (a) by causing the Company or such Affiliate to withhold shares of Stock otherwise issuable to the Grantee or (b) by delivering to the Company or such Affiliate shares of Stock already owned by the Grantee. The shares of Stock so withheld or delivered shall have an aggregate Fair Market Value equal to such withholding obligation. The Fair Market Value of the shares of Stock used to satisfy such withholding obligation shall be determined by the Company or such Affiliate as of the date on which the amount of tax to be withheld is to be determined. A Grantee who has made an election pursuant to this Section 18.3 may satisfy such Grantee’s withholding obligation only with shares of Stock that are not subject to any repurchase, forfeiture, unfulfilled vesting, or other similar requirements. The maximum number of shares of Stock that may be withheld from any Award to satisfy any federal, state or local tax withholding requirements upon the exercise, vesting, or lapse of restrictions applicable to any Award or payment of shares of Stock pursuant to such Award, as applicable, may not exceed such number of shares of Stock having a Fair Market Value equal to the minimum statutory amount required by the Company or the applicable Affiliate to be withheld and paid to any such federal, state or local taxing authority with respect to such exercise, vesting, lapse of restrictions, or payment of shares of Stock. Notwithstanding Section 2.21 or this Section 18.3, for purposes of determining taxable income and the amount of the related tax withholding obligation pursuant to this Section 18.3, for any shares of Stock subject to an Award that are sold by or on behalf of a Grantee on the same date on which such shares may first be sold pursuant to the terms of the related Award Agreement, the Fair Market Value of such shares shall be the sale price of such shares on such date (or if sales of such shares are effectuated at more than one sale price, the weighted average sale price of such shares on such date), so long as such Grantee has provided the Company, or its designee or agent, with advance written notice of such sale. In such case, the percentage of shares of Stock withheld shall equal the applicable minimum withholding rate.

The use of captions in the Plan or any Award Agreement is for convenience of reference only and shall not affect the meaning of any provision of the Plan or such Award Agreement.

Unless the context otherwise requires, all references in the Plan to “including” shall mean “including, without limitation.”

Each Award granted under the Plan may contain such other terms and conditions not inconsistent with the Plan as may be determined by the Committee, in its sole discretion.

With respect to words used in the Plan, the singular form shall include the plural form and the masculine gender shall include the feminine gender, as the context requires.

If any provision of the Plan or any Award Agreement shall be determined to be illegal or unenforceable by any court of law in any jurisdiction, the remaining provisions hereof and thereof shall be severable and enforceable in accordance with their terms, and all provisions shall remain enforceable in any other jurisdiction.

The validity and construction of the Plan and the instruments evidencing the Awards hereunder shall be governed by, and construed and interpreted in accordance with, the laws of the State of Delaware, other than

any conflicts or choice of law rule or principle that might otherwise refer construction or interpretation of the Plan and the instruments evidencing the Awards granted hereunder to the substantive laws of any other jurisdiction.

The Company intends to comply with Code Section 409A, or an exemption to Code Section 409A, with regard to Awards hereunder that constitute nonqualified deferred compensation within the meaning of Code Section 409A. To the extent that the Company determines that a Grantee would be subject to the additional twenty percent (20%) tax imposed on certain nonqualified deferred compensation plans pursuant to Code Section 409A as a result of any provision of any Award granted under the Plan, such provision shall be deemed amended to the minimum extent necessary to avoid application of such additional tax. The nature of any such amendment shall be determined by the Committee.


Filed by the Registrant x
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant o
Check the appropriate box:
o	Preliminary Proxy Statement
o	Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))
x	Definitive Proxy Statement
o	Definitive Additional Materials
o	Soliciting Material under §240.14a-12


URANIUM RESOURCES, INC.
(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
x	No fee required.
o	Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.
	(1)	Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:
	(2)	Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:
	(3)	Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):
	(4)	Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:
	(5)	Total fee paid:
o	Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.
o	Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.
	(1)	Amount Previously Paid:
	(2)	Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:
	(3)	Filing Party:
	(4)	Date Filed:


Matter	Board Recommendation
1. Election of four nominees to our Board of Directors (page 5)	FOR each Director Nominee
2. Ratification of the appointment of Hein & Associates LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for 2017 (page 15)	FOR
3. Advisory vote to approve our executive compensation (page 30)	FOR
4. Advisory vote to approve the frequency of future advisory votes on our executive compensation (page 33)	ONE YEAR
5. Approve an amendment to the Uranium Resources, Inc. 2013 Omnibus Incentive Plan to increase the authorized number of shares of common stock available and reserved for issuance under such plan by one million shares, and re-approve the material terms of the performance goals under such plan (page 34)	FOR


Name	Age	Director Since	Committees
Name	Age	Director Since	Audit	Compensation	Nominating and Corporate Governance	Health, Safety, Environment and Public Affairs
Christopher M. Jones	58	2013				X
Marvin K. Kaiser*	75	2007	X	X	X
Patrick N. Burke*	47	2016	X	X	X	X
Tracy D. Pagliara*	54		X ⁽¹⁾	X ⁽¹⁾	X ⁽¹⁾


Name of Individual or Group	Number of Shares of URI Common Stock Beneficially Owned ⁽¹⁾	Percent of Class
Christopher M. Jones	23,338	*
Marvin K. Kaiser	6,278	*
Tracy A. Stevenson ⁽²⁾	1,981	*
Patrick N. Burke	5,558	*
Tracy D. Pagliara	—	*
Jeffrey L. Vigil	7,207	*
Dean T. (Ted) Wilton	1,098	*
All current directors and executive officers as a group (6 persons)	46,148	*


Board Member	Audit	Compensation	Nominating and Corporate Governance	Health, Safety, Environment and Public Affairs
Christopher M. Jones				Chair
Marvin K. Kaiser*	Chair	X	Chair
Patrick N. Burke*	X	X ⁽¹⁾	X	X
Tracy A. Stevenson* ⁽²⁾	X	Chair	X


Name	Age	Director Since	Primary Occupation
Christopher M. Jones	58	2013	Interim Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer, Uranium Resources, Inc.
Marvin K. Kaiser	75	2007	Founder, Whippoorwill Consulting LLC
Patrick N. Burke	47	2016	Managing Director, Rowan Hall Capital
Tracy D. Pagliara	54	—	Senior Vice President, Chief Administrative Officer, General Counsel and Secretary, Global Power Equipment Group Inc.


	2015	2016
Audit fees ⁽¹⁾	$243,125	$196,807
Audit-related fees	$ 15,023	—
Tax fees	—	—
All other fees	—	—


Name	Age	Position
Christopher M. Jones	58	President and Chief Executive Officer
Jeffrey L. Vigil	63	Vice President – Finance and Chief Financial Officer
Dain A. McCoig	37	Vice President – South Texas Operations


Name	Title
Christopher M. Jones	President, Chief Executive Officer and Director
Jeffrey L. Vigil	Vice President – Finance and Chief Financial Officer
Dean T. “Ted” Wilton⁽¹⁾	Vice President and Chief Geologist


Objective	Description
Attraction and Retention	We provide competitive compensation to our NEOs and tie a significant portion of compensation to time-based and performance-based vesting requirements. Together, these actions help to ensure that we can continue to attract key management personnel and retain such personnel.
Pay for Performance	A significant portion of each NEO’s compensation is “at-risk” or variable, based on predetermined performance criteria. Such criteria include both short- and long-term goals, as well as financial and non-financial goals. The Compensation Committee considers each of these criteria in making its compensation decisions each year.
Pay Mix	We use a variety of fixed-pay and incentive compensation forms, including cash, stock, options and RSUs.
Alignment of Incentives	We require our CEO and CFO to obtain a significant stock ownership stake in the Company and tie a meaningful portion of NEO compensation to awards that vest over multi-year periods.
Competitive Packages	We evaluate our compensation program in an effort to provide a competitive compensation package to each NEO that takes into account their responsibilities, performance and organization.


Pay Element	Characteristics	Primary Objective
Base Salary	Annual fixed cash compensation	Attract and retain qualified and high performing executives
Short-Term Incentive Compensation	Annual compensation based on the achievement of predetermined performance goals	Incentivize our NEOs to achieve the short-term performance goals established by the Compensation Committee
Long-Term Incentive Compensation	Long-term equity awards granted as time-based and performance-based RSUs	Retain our NEOs and align their interests with the interests of our stockholders


Name	Title	2016 Base Salary
Christopher M. Jones	President and Chief Executive Officer	$275,000
Jeffrey L. Vigil	Vice President – Finance and Chief Financial Officer	$200,000
Dean T. “Ted” Wilton	Vice President and Chief Geologist	$175,000


Name and Principal Position	Year		Salary ($)		Stock Awards ($)		Option Awards ($)		Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation ($)⁽¹⁾		Bonus ($)⁽²⁾	All Other Compensation ($)⁽³⁾		Total ($)
Christopher M. Jones		2016		275,000						—	165,000		26,659		466,659
President and CEO		2015		275,000		—		—		110,500	—		1,145		386,645
Jeffrey L. Vigil		2016		200,000						—	60,000		1,253		261,253
Vice President – Finance and CFO		2015		200,000		—		—		40,200	—		1,145		241,345
Dean T. (Ted) Wilton ⁽⁴⁾		2016		175,000						—	52,500		814		228,314
Chief Geologist		2015		175,000		—		—		35,175	—		744		210,919


	Option Awards				Stock Awards
Name	Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) Exercisable	Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) Unexercisable	Option Exercise Price ($)	Option Expiration Date	Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested (#)	Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Market or Payout Value of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested ($)
Christopher M. Jones	2,546	2,037 ⁽¹⁾	32.76	3/12/2023	—	—
	—	—	—	—	3,255⁽¹⁾	4,459
Jeffrey L. Vigil	—	—	—	—	1,302⁽¹⁾	1,784
Dean T. (Ted) Wilton	—	—	—	—	—	—


Name	Fees Earned or Paid in Cash ($)	Stock Awards ($)	Total ($)
Marvin K. Kaiser	78,970	—	78,970
Terence J. Cryan⁽¹⁾	27,143	—	27,143
Tracy A. Stevenson	72,508	—	72,508
Mark K. Wheatley⁽¹⁾	15,659	—	15,659
Patrick N. Burke⁽¹⁾	55,577	—	55,577


Fiscal Year	Options Granted	RSUs Granted	Restricted Stock Granted	Total	% of Weighted Average Number of Shares Outstanding During Year
2016	0	0	0	0	0%
2015(1)	0(2)	0	0	0	0%
2014	0	35,989	0	35,989	1.78%


Name	Number of Vested Options	Number of Unvested Options	Restricted Stock Units
Marvin K. Kaiser	1,390	—	556
Tracy A. Stevenson	312	104	556
Patrick N. Burke	5,558	—	5,558


Plan Category	Number of shares issuable under outstanding options, warrants and rights (a)	Weighted average exercise price of outstanding options, warrants and rights (b)	Number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans (excluding securities reflected in column(a)) (c)
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders ^{(1) (2)}	96,594	$160.39 ⁽³⁾	54,460
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders	—	—	—
Total	96,594	160.39	54,460


	Numbers of Shares	As a % of Common Stock Outstanding (1)
Stock options outstanding (2)	417	—
Restricted stock units outstanding	8,649	0.05%
Restricted stock awards outstanding	—	—
Shares available for grant	54,460	0.33%