UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-QSB

Quarterly Report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2006

Transition Report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

for the transition period from to

Commission File Number 0-15318

BALLISTIC RECOVERY SYSTEMS, INC.

(Exact name of issuer as specified in its charter)

Minnesota		41-1372079
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(IRS Employer Identification No.)

300 Airport Road, South St. Paul, Minnesota		55075-3541
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)		(Zip Code)

(651) 457-7491

(Issuer’s telephone number)

Check whether the issuer: (1) filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the past 12 months (or for such shorter period that the issuer was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ý No o

Indicate by checkmark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No ý

As of May 10, 2006, there were 7,721,663 outstanding shares of common stock, par value $0.01 per share.

Transitional Small Business Disclosure Format (check one) Yes o No ý

Part I Financial Information – Item 1. Consolidated Financial Statements

BALLISTIC RECOVERY SYSTEMS, INC.

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

	March 31, 2006				September 30, 2005
	(Unaudited)				(Audited)
Assets
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$		90,703		$	103,102
Accounts receivable - net of allowance for doubtful
accounts of $10,000 and $10,000 respectively	436,991				457,808
Note receivable – shareholder	—				4,036
Inventories	2,045,790				1,460,919
Deferred tax asset – current portion	112,800				160,700
Income taxes receivable	144,444				230,544
Prepaid expenses	125,741				61,517
Total current assets	2,956,469				2,478,626

Furniture, fixtures and leasehold improvements	1,037,054				942,475
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization	(430,038			)	(357,207			)
Furniture, fixtures and leasehold improvements – net	607,016				585,268

Other assets:
Patents, net of accumulated amortization of $11,082 and $10,739, respectively	582				925
Goodwill	103,774				103,774
Deferred tax asset – net of current portion	1,380,082				1,296,700
Long-term prepaid expenses	15,844				28,269
Covenant not to compete, net of accumulated amortization of $508,969 and $448,149, respectively	96,042				156,862
Total other assets	1,596,324				1,586,530

Total assets	$	5,159,809			$		4,650,424

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

BALLISTIC RECOVERY SYSTEMS, INC.

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

	March 31, 2006				September 30, 2005
	(Unaudited)				(Audited)

Liabilities And Shareholders’ Equity
Current liabilities:
Line of credit – bank	$		505,960		$	204,715
Current portion of long-term debt	155,512				153,951
Current portion of covenant not to compete, shareholders	49,170				87,672
Accounts payable	740,071				305,297
Customer deposits	129,078				125,255
Accrued payroll	68,166				88,561
Other accrued liabilities	128,593				183,870
Total current liabilities	1,776,550				1,149,321

Long-term debt, less current portion	969,431				1,046,049
Covenant not to compete, shareholders, less current portion	—				7,068

Total Liabilities	2,745,981				2,202,438

Shareholders’ equity:
Common stock ($.01 par value; 10,000,000 shares authorized; 7,721,663 and 7,685,434 shares, respectively, issued and outstanding)	77,217				76,854
Additional paid-in capital	5,809,416				5,782,590
Accumulated deficit	(3,472,805			)	(3,411,458			)
Total shareholders’ equity	2,413,828				2,447,986

Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity	$	5,159,809			$		4,650,424

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

BALLISTIC RECOVERY SYSTEMS, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

For the Three Months and Six Months ended March 31, 2006 and 2005

(UNAUDITED)

	Three Months Ended March 31,						Six Months Ended March 31,
	2006			2005			2006			2005
Sales	$	2,366,069		$	2,115,148		$	4,272,943		$	3,981,771
Cost of sales	1,458,822			1,263,650			2,610,503			2,361,508

Gross profit	907,247			851,498			1,662,440			1,620,263

Selling, general and administrative	742,255			608,593			1,382,907			1,117,361
Research and development	139,530			99,182			247,644			181,611
Stock based compensation	—			—			—			69,206
Intangible amortization	30,410			30,410			60,820			51,421

Income (loss) from operations	(4,948		)	113,313			(28,931		)	200,664

Other income (expense):
Interest expense	(40,589		)	(1,884		)	(68,000		)	(3,833		)
Other income (expense)	43			1,699			102			3,448

Income (loss) before income taxes	(45,494		)	113,128			(96,829		)	200,279

Income tax expense (benefit)	(17,882		)	37,806			(35,482		)	73,102

Net income (loss)	$	(27,612	)	$	75,322		$	(61,347	)	$	127,177

Basic earnings (loss) per share	$	(0.00	)	$	0.01		$	(0.01	)	$	0.02

Weighted average number of shares outstanding - basic	7,698,695			7,164,562			7,691,992			7,004,366

Diluted earnings (loss) per share	$	(0.00	)	$	0.01		$	(0.01	)	$	0.02

Weighted average number of shares outstanding - diluted	7,698,695			7,267,588			7,691,992			7,280,568

Dividends per share	$	0.00		$	0.085		$	0.00		$	0.165

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

BALLISTIC RECOVERY SYSTEMS, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOW

For the Six Months Ended March 31, 2006 and 2005

(UNAUDITED)

	2006			2005
Cash flows from operating activity:
Net income (loss)	$	(61,347	)	$	127,177
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash from operating activity:
Deferred income tax	(35,482		)	—
Depreciation and amortization	73,173			47,514
Amortization of covenant not to compete	60,820			51,421
Loss on disposal of furniture, fixtures and leasehold improvements	—			2,435
Expense from stock based compensation – employee	—			69,206
(Increase) decrease in:
Accounts receivable	20,817			30,326
Inventories	(584,871		)	(186,295		)
Prepaid income taxes	86,100			—
Prepaid expenses	(64,224		)	(10,250		)
Long-term prepaid expenses	12,425
Increase (decrease) in:
Accounts payable	434,774			123,156
Customer deposits	3,823			15,465
Accrued expenses	(75,672		)	(43,964		)

Net cash from operating activities	(129,664		)	226,191

Cash flows from investing activities:
Capital expenditures	(94,578		)	(13,397		)

Net cash from investing activities	(94,578		)	(13,397		)

Cash flows from financing activities:
Net proceeds from borrowings under line of credit – bank	301,245			—
Principal payments on long-term debt	(75,057		)	—
Proceeds from exercise of common stock warrants				812,500
Proceeds from exercise of common stock options	27,189			143,476
Principal payments on covenant not to compete	(41,534		)	(115,802		)
Dividend payment	—			(547,543		)

Net cash from financing activities	211,843			292,631

Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents	(12,399		)	505,425
Cash and cash equivalents - beginning of period	103,102			1,314,557

Cash and cash equivalents - end of period	$	90,703		$	1,819,982

Cash paid for (received from) taxes	$	(86,100	)	$	144,846
Cash paid for interest	$	61,090		$	3,833
Summary of non-cash activity:
Dividends declared, not paid	$	—		$	648,914
Issuance of covenant not to compete agreement	$	—		$	225,573
Increase in deferred tax asset and additional paid-in capital for stock options and warrants exercised	$	—		$	830,000

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

BALLISTIC RECOVERY SYSTEMS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

March 31, 2006 and 2005

(UNAUDITED)

A. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Principles of Consolidation

In September 2005, the Company formed its wholly-owned subsidiary, BRS de Mexico S.A. de C.V. The consolidated financial statements include the wholly-owned subsidiary. All significant intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation.

Basis of Presentation

The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States for interim financial statements and the instructions to Form 10-QSB and Item 310(b) of Regulation S-B. They do not include all of the information and footnotes required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States for complete financial statements.

Operating results for the three and six months ended March 31, 2006 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2006. These consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and footnotes thereto included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended September 30, 2005, previously filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

In the opinion of management, such statements reflect all adjustments (which include only normal recurring adjustments) necessary for a fair presentation of the financial position, results of operations, and cash flows for the periods presented.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect certain reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Cash Concentrations

Bank balances exceeded federally insured levels during the first two quarters of fiscal year 2006 and 2005. Generally, these balances may be redeemed upon demand and therefore bear minimal risk.

Accounts Receivable, Credit Risk and Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

The Company sells its products to domestic and foreign customers. The Company reviews customers’ credit history before extending unsecured credit and established an allowance for doubtful accounts based upon factors surrounding the credit risk of specific customers and other information. The Company does not accrue interest on past due accounts receivable. Unless specific arrangements have been made, accounts receivable over 30 days are considered past due. The Company writes off accounts receivable when they are deemed uncollectible. There were no accounts written off during the three and six months ended March 31, 2006 and 2005. Accounts receivable are shown net of an allowance for doubtful accounts of $10,000 at both March 31,

2006 and September 30, 2005. The estimated loss that management believes is probable is included in the allowance for doubtful accounts. Due to uncertainties in the collection process, however, it is at least reasonably possible that management’s estimate will change during the next year, which cannot be estimated.

Customer Concentration

The Company had sales to one major customer, Cirrus Design Corporation (Cirrus), which represented 69.6% and 71.8% of the Company’s total sales for the three months and six months ended March 31, 2006, as compared to 72.1% and 75.6% for the same prior year periods. This customer also accounted for 67% (or $294,716) and 90% (or $412,819) of accounts receivable at March 31, 2006 and September 30, 2005, respectively. The Company supplies parachute systems to Cirrus from the Company’s general aviation product line.

In its recreational aviation product line, the Company primarily distributes its products through dealers and distributors who in turn sell the products to the end consumer. The Company believes that in the event that any individual dealers or distributors cease to represent the Company’s products, alternative dealers or distributors can be established.

Valuation of Inventories

Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market. Cost is determined by the first-in, first-out (“FIFO”) method. We maintain a standard costing system for our inventories. Assumptions with respect to direct labor utilization, standard direct and indirect cost rates, vendor pricing and utilization of factory capacities are formulated in the development of our standard costing system. Sudden or continuing changes in the Company’s product markets could result in significant production variances from our standard rates. These variances could directly impact our gross profit performance and may cause variability in gross profit results from reporting period to reporting period. Our labor and overhead rates are set for production rates that match typical market conditions. Production variances are charged to cost of sales each quarter as incurred. Material standards are based upon normal purchase volumes. Purchase price variances are charged to cost of sales each quarter as incurred.

Provisions to reduce inventories to the lower of cost or market are made based on a review of excess and obsolete inventories through an examination of historical component consumption, current market demands and shifting production methods. Significant assumptions with respect to market trends and customer product acceptance are utilized to formulate our provision methods. Sudden or continuing downward changes in the Company’s product markets may cause us to record additional inventory revaluation charges in future periods. No write-off provision was made to our inventories for the three and six months ended March 31, 2006 or 2005.

Customer Deposits

The Company requires order deposits from most of its domestic and international customers. These deposits represent either partial or complete down payments for orders. These down payments are refundable and are recorded as customer deposits. The deposits are recognized as revenue when the product is shipped. The Company’s major customer, Cirrus, does not make order deposits.

Income Taxes

Differences between accounting rules and tax laws cause differences between the bases of certain assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and tax purposes. The tax effects of these differences, to the extent they are temporary, are recorded as deferred tax assets and liabilities under Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) 109. Temporary differences relate primarily to: allowances for doubtful accounts; inventory valuation allowances; depreciation; net operating loss carryforwards and accrued expenses not currently deductible.

Segment Reporting

A business segment is a distinguishable component of an enterprise that is engaged in providing an individual product or service or a group of related products or services and that is subject to risks and returns that are different from those of other business segments. The Company’s segments have similar economic characteristics and are similar in the nature of the products sold, type of customers, methods used to distribute the Company’s products and regulatory environment. Management believes that the Company meets the criteria for aggregating its operating segments into a single reporting segment.

Stock-Based Compensation

SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation (“SFAS 123”), provides for the use of a fair value based method of accounting for employee stock compensation. However, SFAS 123 also allows an entity to continue to measure compensation cost for stock options granted to employees using the intrinsic value method of accounting prescribed by Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees (“APB 25”), which only requires charges to compensation expense for the excess, if any, of the fair value of the underlying stock at the date a stock option is granted (or at an appropriate subsequent measurement date) over the amount the employee must pay to acquire the stock, if such amounts differ materially from historical amounts. The Company has elected to continue to account for employee stock options using the intrinsic value method under APB 25. By making that election, it is required by SFAS 123 and SFAS 148, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation – Transition and Disclosure” to provide pro forma disclosures of net income (loss) and earnings (loss) per share as if a fair value based method of accounting had been applied.

Had compensation costs been determined in accordance with the fair value method prescribed by SFAS No. 123 for all options issued to employees and amortized over the vesting period, the Company’s net income (loss) applicable to common shares and net income (loss) per common share (basic and diluted) for plan options would not have changed as indicated below.

	Three Months Ended March 31,						Six Months Ended March 31,
	2006				2005		2006				2005

Net income (loss):

As reported	$	(27,612		)	$	75,322	$		(61,347	)	$	127,177
Pro forma	(27,612			)	75,322		(61,347			)	127,177

Basic net income (loss) per common share:
As reported	(0.00			)	0.01		(0.01			)	0.02
Pro forma	(0.00			)	0.01		(0.01			)	0.02

Diluted net income (loss) per common share:
As reported	(0.00			)	0.01		(0.01			)	0.02
Pro forma	(0.00			)	0.01		(0.01			)	0.02

Stock based compensation:
As reported	$		0		$	0	$	0			$	69,206
Pro forma	$		0		$	0	$	0			$	0

No employee options were granted or vested during the three and six months ended March 31, 2006 and 2005. Had options been granted, the fair value of each option granted is estimated on the date of the grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model.

Earnings (Loss) Per Common Share

Basic earnings (loss) per common share are computed by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings (loss) per common share is computed by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding plus all additional common stock that would have been outstanding if potentially dilutive common stock related to stock options and warrants had been issued. Weighted average shares outstanding-diluted includes 0 and 103,026 shares of dilutive securities for the three months ended March 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. Weighted average shares outstanding-diluted includes 0 and 276,202 shares of dilutive securities for the six months ended March 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively.

Following is a reconciliation of basic and diluted earnings per common share for the three months and six months ended March 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively:

	Three Months Ended March 31,					Six Months Ended March 31,
	2006			2005		2006			2005
Earnings (loss) per common share — basic:

Net income (loss)	$	(27,612	)	$	75,322	$	(61,347	)	$	127,177

Weighted average shares outstanding	7,698,695			7,164,562		7,691,992			7,004,366

Net income (loss) per common share — basic	$	(0.00	)	$	0.01	$	(0.01	)	$	0.02

Earnings (loss) per common share - diluted:

Net income (loss)	$	(27,612	)	$	75,322	$	(61,347	)	$	127,177

Weighted average shares outstanding	7,698,695			7,164,562		7,691,992			7,004,366

Common stock equivalents	0			103,026		0			276,202

Weighted average shares and potential diluted shares outstanding	7,698,695			7,267,588		7,691,992			7,280,568

Net income (loss) per common share — diluted	$	(0.00	)	$	0.01	$	(0.01	)	$	0.02

The Company uses the treasury method for calculating the dilutive effect of the stock options and warrants using the average market price during the fiscal year.

All outstanding options (105,000 shares) were excluded in the computation of common share equivalents for the three and six months ended March 31, 2006 since there was a loss for the periods.

All outstanding options and warrants (170,000 shares) were included in the computation of common share equivalents for the three and six months ended March 31, 2005 because their respective exercise prices were less than the average market price of the common stock.

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

In November 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 151 “Inventory Costs,” (SFAS No. 151) which amends the guidance in ARB No. 43 (ARB 43), Chapter 4 “Inventory Pricing,” to clarify the accounting for abnormal amounts of idle facility expense, freight, handling costs, and wasted material (spoilage). Paragraph 5 of ARB 43, Chapter 4, previously stated that under some circumstances, items such as idle facility expense, excessive spoilage, double freight, and rehandling costs may be so abnormal as to require treatment as current period charges. SFAS No. 151 requires that those items be recognized as current-period charges regardless of whether they meet the criterion of “so abnormal.” In addition, SFAS No. 151 requires that allocation of fixed production overheads to the costs of conversion be based on the normal capacity of the production facilities. SFAS No. 151 shall be effective for inventory costs incurred during fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2005. Earlier application is permitted for inventory costs incurred during fiscal years beginning after the date SFAS No. 151 was issued. SFAS No. 151 shall be applied prospectively. The Company evaluated and implemented SFAS No. 151 and did not have any abnormal costs during the three and six months ended March 31, 2006.

In December 2004, FASB issued SFAS No. 153 “Exchanges of Nonmonetary Assets” (SFAS No. 153) amends APB Opinion No. 29, “Accounting for Nonmonetary Transactions.” APB No. 29 is based on the principle that exchanges of nonmonetary assets should be measured based on the fair value of the assets exchanged. The guidance in that Opinion, however, included certain exceptions to that principle. SFAS No. 153 amends APB No. 29 to eliminate the exception for nonmonetary exchanges of similar productive assets and replaces it with a general exception for exchanges of nonmonetary assets that do not have commercial substance. A nonmonetary exchange has commercial substance if the future cash flows of the entity are expected to change significantly as a result of the exchange. SFAS No. 153 will be effective for nonmonetary asset exchanges occurring in fiscal periods beginning after June 15, 2005. Earlier application is permitted for nonmonetary asset exchanges occurring in fiscal periods beginning after the date SFAS No. 153 was issued. SFAS No. 153 shall be applied prospectively. The adoption of SFAS No. 153 did not have a material effect on the consolidated financial statements.

In December 2004, FASB issued SFAS No. 123 (revised 2004), “Share-Based Payment,” (SFAS No. 123R) that focuses primarily on accounting for transactions in which an entity obtains employee services in shared-based payment transactions. This statement replaces SFAS No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation,” and supersedes APB Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock issued to Employees.” Beginning October 1, 2006 we are required to expense the fair value of employee stock options and similar awards. As a public company we were allowed to select from two alternative transition methods, each having different reporting implications. The Company did not expect the adoption of SFAS No. 123R to have a material effect on the consolidated financial statements based on options outstanding at March 31, 2006 are fully vested.

In June 2005, FASB issued SFAS No. 154, “Accounting Changes and Error Corrections”, a replacement of APB Opinion No. 20 and FASB Statement No. 3. The statement applies to all voluntary changes in accounting principle, and changes the requirements for accounting for and reporting of a change in accounting principle. SFAS No. 154 requires retrospective application to prior periods’ financial statements of a voluntary change in accounting principle unless it is impracticable. SFAS No. 154 is effective for accounting changes and corrections of errors made in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2005. Earlier application is permitted for accounting changes and corrections of errors made occurring in fiscal years beginning after June 1, 2005. The statement does not change the transition provisions of any existing accounting pronouncements, including those that are in a transition phase as of the effective date of this statement. The Company does not expect the adoption of SFAS No. 154 to have a material effect on the consolidated financial statements.

Foreign Currency Translation and Transactions

The Company accounts for its transactions in its functional currency the U.S. dollar. Foreign assets and liabilities will be translated into U.S. dollars using year-end exchange rates. Equity will be translated at average historical exchange rates. Results of operations will be translated using the average exchange rates throughout the year. Translation gains or losses will be accumulated as a separate component of shareholders’ equity. For the three and six months ended March 31, 2006, there were no foreign currency translation gains or losses.

B. Covenants Not to Compete

On October 26, 1995 the Company entered into an agreement with the president and majority shareholder of Second Chantz Aerial Survival Equipment, Inc. (SCI), whereby SCI ceased all business activities, and SCI’s president and majority shareholder entered into a ten-year covenant not to compete with the Company. The payments required under this agreement contained a non-interest-bearing portion and a portion that bears interest at a rate below the Company’s incremental borrowing rate. Under generally accepted accounting principles the future payments were discounted at the Company’s incremental borrowing rate. The 4% ten year note called for monthly payments of $4,036 through October 2005. This note has been paid in full.

On August 16, 2004, the Company extended the non-compete period by five additional years in exchange for the exercise of stock options held by SCI’s president under a stock subscription agreement backed by a promissory note. The note has a principal sum of $12,500 together with aggregate interest on the unpaid principal balance of $2,500. Payments under the note begin July 1, 2005 and continued monthly with a final maturity date of October 1, 2005. The present value of the Company’s obligation under this agreement was recorded as an intangible asset and is being amortized over a total of fifteen years as shown in the accompanying financial statements.

On October 14, 2004, the Company and Mr. Mark Thomas entered into a Resignation, Consulting, Non-Competition and General Release Agreement (the “Resignation Agreement”) in connection with Mr. Thomas’ resignation as Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, President, and as a director of the Company. Pursuant to the terms of the Resignation Agreement, Mr. Thomas resigned such offices effective October 14, 2004.

Mr. Thomas agreed, for a two year period, not to 1) call on or solicit Company customers, 2) directly or indirectly, become employed by, consult with, manage, own or operate any business engaged in the design, manufacturing, marketing or distribution of (i) emergency parachute recovery systems for recreational, general and commercial aviation aircraft and unmanned aircraft or (ii) general aviation aircraft. Mr. Thomas also agreed not to divulge any trade secrets or confidential information regarding the Company. In exchange for such Resignation Agreement, the Company agreed to pay Mr. Thomas an aggregate of $230,000; $60,000 of which was paid 15 days after execution of the Agreement and $170,000 of which would be paid over a 24 month period ($7,083 per month) during the compliance of Mr. Thomas’ non-competition /non-disclosure requirements. The present value of the Company’s obligation under this agreement was recorded as an intangible asset and is being amortized over two years as shown in the accompanying financial statements.

Future payments under these agreements are as follows:

Fiscal Year	Future Dollars		Present Dollars
2006	42,500		42,102
2007	7,083		7,068
	$	49,583	$	49,170

C. Other Financial Information

Inventories

The components of inventory consist of the following at March 31, 2006 and September 30, 2005:

	03/31/2006		09/30/2005
Raw materials	$	1,670,476	$	1,162,175
Work in process	347,588		252,225
Finished goods	27,726		46,519
Total inventories	$	2,045,790	$	1,460,919

Furniture, Fixtures and Leasehold Improvements

Furniture, fixtures and leasehold improvements consisted of the following categories at March 31, 2006 and September 30, 2005:

	03/31/2006		09/30/2005
Office furniture and equipment	$	309,726	$	293,930
Manufacturing equipment	444,145		383,078
Airplane	283,183		265,467
Total furniture, fixtures and leasehold improvements	$	1,037,054	$	942,475

Other Accrued Liabilities

Other accrued liabilities consisted of the following categories at March 31, 2006 and September 30, 2005:

	03/31/2006		09/30/2005
Bonus and profit sharing plan accrual	$	93,149	$	44,530
Contingency Accrual	—		80,000
Other miscellaneous accruals	35,444		59,340
Total other accrued liabilities	$	128,593	$	183,870

Related Parties – Consulting Agreements with Directors

Effective as of November 19, 2004, the Company entered into a Consulting Agreement with Mr. Boris Popov, a director of the Company, pursuant to which Mr. Popov would provide certain consulting services relating to the Company’s new product development. Pursuant to this agreement, the term of which was six months, Mr. Popov is required to provide a minimum of 64 hours of service per month for $3,200 per month and shall be paid an additional $50 per hour for each hour over the 64 hour minimum. On March 16, 2005, the Company extended this agreement for 12 additional months. On March 16, 2006, the Company extended this agreement for two additional years. Consulting expenses for Mr. Popov were $12,073 for the first and second quarter of fiscal year 2006 and $21,162 for the year ended September 30, 2005.

For all such agreements, the fees paid were and will be in addition to and independent of any fees or compensation owed to such directors in their capacity as non-employee directors.

Product Warranties

The Company offers its customers up to a one-year warranty on its products. The warranty covers only manufacturing defects, which will be replaced or repaired by the Company at no charge to the customer. The Company has not recorded an accrual for possible warranty claims and believes that the product warranties as offered will not have a material effect on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows. Prior historical product warranties have been immaterial.

D. Geographical Information

The Company has operations in South St. Paul, Minnesota and Tijuana, Mexico. Information about the Company’s operations by geographical location are as follows for first two quarters ended March 31, 2006. The Company did not have operations in Mexico until late September 2005, therefore there is no geographical information to disclose for 2005.

Six months ended March 31, 2006	Minnesota		Mexico			Consolidated
Total assets	$	4,853,638	$	306,171		$	5,159,809
Sales	$	4,223,508	$	49,435		$	4,272,943
Income (loss) from operations	$	237,320	$	(266,251	)	$	(28,931	)
Net income (loss)	$	107,723	$	(169,070	)	$	(61,347	)

Three months ended March 31, 2006	Minnesota		Mexico			Consolidated
Total assets	$	4,853,638	$	306,171		$	5,159,809
Sales	$	2,316,634	$	49,435		$	2,366,069
Income (loss) from operations	$	125,807	(130,755		)	$	(4,948	)
Net income (loss)	$	55,362	$	(82,974	)	$	(27,612	)

E. Line-of-Credit Borrowings

The Company has a $500,000 line-of-credit with a bank on an annual renewal basis and is collateralized by all of the Company’s assets. The current line-of-credit expires September 6, 2006. The line calls for a variable interest rate of 7.89% and 6.97% at March 31, 2006 and September 30, 2005, respectively. At March 31, 2006, there was an outstanding balance of $505,960, including accrued interest, under the line of credit. At September 30, 2005, there was an outstanding balance of $204,715 under the line of credit. The Company expects to renew the line each year following the review of its financial results and projections with the bank. Of the $500,000 line-of-credit, the first $300,000 is senior to the long-term debt owed to Parsons and Aerospace (see Note F) and the remaining $200,000 of the line-of-credit is subordinated to the long-term debt.

F. Long-Term Debt

creditor. The Company was in compliance with all financial covenants as of September 30, 2005. In the event the Company were in default under the settlement agreement for a period of time as provided in the settlement agreement, the amount owed to Parsons and Aerospace Marketing would revert to $3.4 million minus amounts already paid under the settlement agreement.

The components of long-term debt consist of the following at December 31, 2005 and September 30, 2005:

	03/31/2006		09/30/2005
Note payable – Parsons, principal and interest payments due in monthly installments of $17,281 including interest at 6.5%, through September 2010, collateralized by substantially all assets of the Company	$	804,943	$	880,000

Note payable – Parsons, interest only payments at 6.5% through September 2010, then principal and interest payments due in monthly installments of $9,808 including interest at 6.5%, from October 2010 through September 2013, collateralized by substantially all assets of the Company	320,000		320,000

Total long-term debt	1,124,943		1,200,000

Less: current portion	155,512		153,951

Long-term debt, net of current portion	$	969,431	$	1,046,049

Future minimum payments required at March 31, 2006 are as follows:

Fiscal Year	Amount
2006	$	155,512
2007	168,002
2008	181,494
2009	196,071
2010	152,183
2011 and thereafter	271,681
	$	1,124,943

G. Stock Options

During the second quarter of 2006, 30,000 stock options were exercised resulting in net proceeds to the Company of $27,189. In addition, the Company retired 8,771 shares and the proceeds were used to exercise an additional 15,000 stock options.

During the six months ended March 31, 2006, 140,000 stock options were exercised resulting in net proceeds to the Company of $143,476. On October 14, 2004, as part of the Resignation Agreement entered into with Mr. Thomas, the Company agreed to extend the exercise date of Mr. Thomas’ existing stock options to acquire an aggregate of 60,000 shares of common stock for one additional year. Under FASB Interpretation No. 44 – FIN 44 – Accounting for Certain Transactions Involving Stock Compensation, the Company recorded a charge for stock based compensation for the difference between the fair market value of the Company’s common stock and the exercise price of the options as of the date of the Resignation Agreement. The expense for the stock based compensation was $0 and $69,206 for the six months ended March 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively.

H. Commitments and Contingencies

Legal Proceedings

(a) In August 2003, the Company was served in two related actions, Kathleen F. Fischer, Individually and as personal representative of the Estate of Joseph C. Fischer v. Cirrus Design Corp., Ballistic Recovery Systems, Inc., and Wings Aloft, Inc., U.S. District Court for the Northern District of New York, File No. 03-CV-0782 (HGM/DEP), and Susan Sedgwick, Individually, on her own behalf as surviving spouse of Thomas P. Sedgwick, as Executrix of the Estate of Thomas P. Sedgwick, deceased, and on behalf of all interested beneficiaries, including Jamie Lynn Sedgwick and Jacqueline Ann Sedgwick v. Cirrus Design Corp., Ballistic Recovery Systems, Inc. and Wings Aloft, Inc., U.S. District Court for the Northern District of New York, File No. 03-CV-0592 (HGM/DEP).

These actions arise from the crash of a Cirrus Design Corp. SR22 airplane in April 2002 near Parish, New York. Plaintiffs have brought claims for strict products liability, negligence and breach of warranty against Cirrus Design, the airplane’s manufacturer, the Company, which manufactures the CAPS (Cirrus Airframe Parachute System), a parachute system which is a required component of the plane, and Wings Aloft, Inc., which provided training on the SR22 to the decedents.

In preliminary reports submitted to the court, the plaintiff in Fischer has estimated the damages to be sought at trial as sixty million dollars, and the plaintiff in Sedgwick has submitted an estimate of seven million five hundred thousand dollars.

The matters have been consolidated for purposes of discovery, which began in November 2003 and is expected to be completed by November 1, 2006, with the trials currently scheduled to commence later in 2007. At this time, the Company cannot state with any degree of certainty what the outcome of these matters will be or the amount or range of potential loss, if any. The Company will vigorously defend these matters.

(b) In September 2004, an action against the Company has been commenced by the estate of Douglas Lefebvre arising from the crash of a Sabian Rans S-12XL near Mexican Hat, Utah on September 22, 2002. Mr. Lefebvre was the passenger on the aircraft. The Company reached a settlement with the Lefebvre estate on October 13, 2005, and the action has been dismissed with prejudice. The amount of the settlement was accrued at September 30, 2005, and is not material to the consolidated financial position or results of the operations of the Company. The terms of

the settlement are confidential and do not have a material adverse impact on the Company. The amount was paid in December 2005.

(c) In April 2005, an action was commenced against the Company by Sue Jean McGrath, individually and as successor in interest to Charles W. McGrath, deceased, Charles W. McGrath III, Tanya Sue McGrath, Janny Sue McGrath, individually v. Cirrus Design Corporation, Ballistic Recovery Systems, Inc., and Aerospace Systems and Technologies, Inc., U.S. District Court, Northern District of California, File No. C05-1542. The plaintiffs have alleged vicarious liability, strict product liability, negligence and breach of warranty against the defendants arising from the crash of a Cirrus Design Corp. SR22 airplane near Sugar Bowl, California. The action is in the very early stages of discovery and the Company cannot at this time state with any degree of certainty what the outcome of the matter or the amount or range of potential damages will be, if any. The Company intends to vigorously defend this matter.

(d) On September 16, 2005, an action was commenced against the Company by Robert Treat Rayner, in the Circuit Court of the 5th Judicial Circuit in and from Lake County Florida, File No. 04 CA 1749. The Complaint alleges that plaintiff was injured when his ultralight aircraft crashed while being towed by another ultralight. Plaintiff alleges that he deployed his BRS system, but that it failed to deploy properly. BRS is undertaking an investigation of the claim and has responded to the suit. At this time, the Company cannot state with any degree of certainty what the outcome of these matters will be or the amount or range of potential loss, if any. BRS believes that it has strong defenses to the suit and will vigorously defend against the claims.

I. Dividend Payment

The Board of Directors examines the liquidity and capital requirements of the Company at each board meeting. If in the judgment of the Board of Directors they may declare a special dividend. No dividend was declared or paid in the three and six months ended March 31, 2006.

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OR PLAN OF OPERATION

Results of Operations:

Sales

Sales for the second quarter of fiscal year 2006 were $2,366,069 compared to $2,115,148 for the second quarter of fiscal year 2005, an increase of $250,921 or 11.9%. On a year to date basis, sales were $4,272,943 for the first six months of fiscal year 2006, compared to $3,981,771 for the first six months of fiscal year 2005, an increase of $291,172 or 7.3%. The Company’s recreational aircraft sales increased by $214,456, or 49.3%, for the second quarter of fiscal year 2006 over 2005, and increased by $314,956, or 41.5%, for the first six months of fiscal year 2006 over 2005. The Company’s general aviation products, which consist primarily of sales to Cirrus Design Corporation (“Cirrus”), decreased by $13,563, or 0.8%, for the second quarter and decreased by $73,219, or 2.3% year to date. This year to date decrease of $73,219 consisted of an increase in sales to Cirrus of $21,657 and a decrease in other general

On January 9, 2006, the Company received the STC from the FAA for the Symphony SA 160. This latest approval, the Company’s fourth, is the first one available directly from the aircraft manufacturer as a factory-installed option. The first customer delivery and installation was completed in March 2006.

The Company’s recreational aircraft product line sales, which largely consist of products for sport aircraft, increased by 41.5% during the second quarter of fiscal year 2006 compared to the second quarter of the prior fiscal year and accounted for 25.4% of the Company’s revenues for the second quarter of fiscal year 2006 versus 19.1% of the Company’s revenues for the second quarter of the prior fiscal year 2005. Like the general aviation product, these recreational aviation products are designed to prevent or reduce bodily injury to the human occupant. The Company manufactures these products and sells them directly to individuals or through dealers and distributors who also market and sell the aircraft and related products. The Company currently works with approximately 62 dealers and distributors worldwide. Sales to international customers accounted for 43.6% and 54.9% of recreational aviation product sales for the three months ended March 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively.

Federal Light Sport Aircraft (LSA) regulations were approved on December 24, 2004 regulating airplanes that weigh less than 1,320 lbs. Management believes that these regulations may positively affect the Company’s future recreational aviation product sales if LSA sales increase in the United States as a result of these regulatory changes and the Company develops and manufactures compatible products.

Many LSA aircraft were developed around existing eastern European aircraft designs, some of which, but not all, have a BRS installation. The LSA category currently has 32 approved airplane types and the Company is in development of installation designs for 14 of these aircraft. Flight Design of Germany has contracted to add BRS systems on every US-delivered CT airplane as standard equipment. No assurances can be given that these new regulations will have a positive impact on sales of the Company’s recreational aircraft products or that the European manufacturers will accept the Company’s design suggestions.

The Company anticipates being able to expand its general aviation and recreational product lines to include other certified and non-certified aircraft as the Company’s recovery systems gain further market acceptance. The Company is in ongoing discussions with other domestic and foreign, general aviation and recreational aircraft companies that have expressed interest in utilizing certain of the Company’s products. These companies produce both certified and non-certified aircraft. No assurance can be made as to the future benefits, if any, that the Company will derive from these discussions.

Gross Operating Margin

Gross operating margin as a percentage of revenues was 38.3% for the second quarter of fiscal year 2006 compared to 40.3% for the comparative quarter of fiscal year 2005. On a year to date basis, the gross operating margin was 38.9% and 40.7% for fiscal years 2006 and 2005, respectively. The decrease in gross margin was due primarily to price reductions granted to Cirrus Design under terms of the Purchase and Supply Agreement between the two companies. The Company expects to provide additional pricing reductions to its larger customers in the future and as a result, the gross margins could be impacted. The decrease in gross margin was also due to increased costs associated with the start up of production costs in Mexico. However, the Company anticipates cost savings and material cost reductions with the increase of production in Mexico, which began full production of two product lines in January 2006, and will continue to look for further savings and cost reductions on an ongoing basis as the production of

additional product lines moves to Mexico. The Company’s objective is to maintain or improve overall gross margins in the future.

Selling, General and Administrative

Selling, general and administrative costs as a percentage of sales were 31.4% ($742,255) for the second quarter of fiscal year 2006 as compared to 28.8% ($608,593) for the second quarter of fiscal year 2005. On a year to date basis, these costs were 32.4% and 28.1% for fiscal years 2006 and 2005, respectively. This net increase for the second quarter of $133,662 in selling, general and administrative costs consisted primarily of insurance costs associated with the indemnification agreement with Cirrus totaling $87,920. Prior to February 3, 2006, there were no product liability costs as the Company did not maintain product liability insurance. The remaining increase relates to start-up costs in Mexico.

The increase in costs associated with the Mexico operation included relocating operations to a new building, setting up and production of test products and the testing of those products. Beginning in January 2006, two product lines, the 1350 and the 1050 canopies, began full production in Mexico.

Research and Development, net

Research and development costs were 5.9% and 4.7% of sales for the second quarter of fiscal years 2006 and 2005, respectively. On a fiscal year to date basis, theses costs were 5.7% and 4.6% for fical years 2006 and 2005, respectively. Management believes that research and development is an integral part of the growth strategy for the Company, and will continue to play an important role in the Company’s success. Therefore, increases in research and development expenditures are planned for the future in the areas of new product development and in the expansion of currently developed products for additional applications. The Company expects research and development costs to approach $650,000 for fiscal year 2006.

The Company has undertaken research and development on potential new products and services including enhancements to current products. Such efforts may result in future offerings and model upgrades to existing products. The development efforts are funded through current operations and it is unclear what impact, if any, these will have on future sales or financial performance of the Company.

Acquisitions

As part of the overall growth strategy of the Company, it is management’s intent to seek out, evaluate and execute strategic acquisitions to grow the product base and integrate operations with the primary focus on cost savings and product diversification. Management cannot state at this point with any degree of certainty what the results of any pending acquisitions may be or the financial impact on Company operations.

Stock Based Compensation

During the first quarter 2005, as part of the Resignation Agreement entered into with Mr. Thomas, the Company agreed to extend the exercise date of Mr. Thomas’ existing stock options to acquire an aggregate of 60,000 shares of Common Stock for one additional year. Under FASB No. 44 - FIN#44 – Accounting for Certain Transactions Involving Stock Compensation, the Company recorded a charge for stock based compensation for the difference between the fair market value of the Company’s common stock and the exercise price of the options as of the date of the Resignation Agreement. The amount of expense recorded was $69,206 during the first quarter of fiscal year 2005. The Company did not record any expense during the first two quarters of fiscal year 2006 or the second quarter of fiscal year 2005.

Intangible Amortization

The Company records amortization expense related to the covenant not to compete agreements entered into with SCI and Mr. Thomas over the remaining life of the agreements. Intangible amortization expense increased by $9,399 for the first two quarters of fiscal year 2006 over the same period in the prior year as a result of a full year of amortization and the Resignation Agreement entered into with Mr. Thomas in the first quarter of 2005.

Net Income and Earnings per Share

Income (loss) before income taxes as a percentage of revenues was (1.9)% and 5.3% for the second quarter of fiscal year 2006 and 2005, respectively. This decrease in income ($102,934) is primarily attributed to the start-up costs of $130,756 associated in the Mexico operations and increased interest expense associated with new long-term debt.

Earnings per share were relatively consistent in the fiscal periods. On a diluted earnings per share basis, net loss of $27,612 for the second quarter of fiscal year 2006 was (1.2)% of sales or ($0.00) per share, as compared to net income of $75,322, which was 3.6% of sales or $0.01 per share for the prior fiscal year quarter.

Liquidity and Capital Resources:

As of March 31, 2006, the Company had a cash and cash equivalents of $90,703. The Company has a secured line-of-credit for $500,000. The Company had a balance outstanding under the line-of-credit of $505,960 at March 31, 2006. Management believes that cash from current business operations, along with the line-of-credit, is adequate to support the ongoing operations of the Company during the next twelve-month period. If additional cash is needed, the Company may pursue additional debt or equity financing. The terms of any new financing may not be with terms acceptable to the Company. However, our relative dependence upon Cirrus as a customer who accounts for approximately 70% of our revenues, makes our liquidity dependent, in large part, upon their ability to pay on a timely basis. Any significant delay in payments from Cirrus could have an adverse impact on our business.

The Company will continue to look for non-equity sources to fund contract research and development projects, but there can be no assurances that the Company will be successful in its efforts. The Company funds its non-contract research and development out of operations.

The Company anticipates a need to make continuing capital improvements to its current production facilities in both the US and Mexico and continued equipment and tooling upgrades, consistent with that of prior years. The Company increased inventory at its Mexican facility during the first two quarters of fiscal year 2006 as a result of a build-up for Mexico operations and further market penetration. It is currently the intention of the Company to fund these expenditures through current operations as well as revenues generated by those units. As of March 31, 2006, total inventory at the Mexico facility was $527,533. It is anticipated that this inventory will decrease significantly to approximately $300,000 on an ongoing basis, as more production is moved to Mexico.

Prior to February 3, 2006, the Company did not have any product liability insurance. As part of the Amendment to the Purchase and Supply Agreement with Cirrus entered into on February 6, 2006, Cirrus agreed to maintain products liability insurance on the CAPS system, the parachute system whose components are directly or indirectly supplied by BRS. Additionally, Cirrus agreed to indemnify BRS, except in certain limited circumstances, for all related product liability claims involving the CAPS system except claims for economic losses for damage or injury related solely to the aircraft. However, this indemnification and product liability insurance covering the CAPS system does not cover our existing products liability litigation. In those cases, we are still responsible for ongoing litigation expenses and any potential adverse judgement. A significant judgment against the Company in its existing litigation would have a material impact on the Company. The Company has incurred approximately $170,000 in

legal fees during the first six months of fiscal year 2006 attributable to all legal support matters and the defense of its pending lawsuits.

In July 2005, a jury awarded damages to Parsons and Aerospace Marketing in the combined amount of approximately $3.4 million for breach of contract. BRS settled this matter directly with Parsons and Aerospace on September 19, 2005 by agreeing to pay $1.9 million pursuant to terms described in the settlement agreement. An initial payment of $700,000 plus interest was made on September 19, 2005. The remainder of the settlement amount will be paid by BRS over a term of 8 years, although BRS has the right to pre-pay remaining amounts due at any time. The terms of the notes require monthly payments of $19,771 for the first five years, and monthly payments of $9,991 for the final 3 years. The terms of the agreements’ contain certain financial covenants. The Company was in violation of certain financial covenants of this debt agreement at March 31, 2006. A waiver was obtained from the lender. The Company was in compliance with all financial covenants as of September 30, 2005. In the event the Company were in default under the settlement agreement for a period of time as provided in the settlement agreement, the amount owed to Parsons and Aerospace Marketing would revert to $3.4 million minus amounts already paid under the settlement agreement.

The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 provides “safe harbor” for forward-looking statements. Certain information included in this Form 10-KSB and other materials filed or to be filed by the Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission (as well as information included in oral statements or other written statements made or to be made by the Company) contain statements that are forward-looking, such as statements relating to anticipated Cirrus Design delivery orders and schedules, plans for research projects, development, anticipated delivery orders and schedules for the Cessna 182 system, the Cessna 172 system, the Symphony SA 160 system, the timing and impact of regulations on Light Sport Aircraft sales, other business development activities as well as other capital spending, financial sources, and the effects of competition. Such forward-looking information involves important risks and uncertainties that could significantly affect anticipated results in the future and, accordingly, such results may differ from those expressed in any forward-looking statements made by or on behalf of the Company. These risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to, dependence on Cirrus Design, potential product liability claims and payment if such claims are successful, federal transportation rules and regulation which may negatively impact the Company’s ability to ship its products in a cost efficient manner, the elimination of funding for new research and development projects, the decline in registered and unregistered aircraft sales, dependence on discretionary consumer spending, dependence on existing management, general economic conditions, changes in federal or state laws or regulations.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

During the quarter ended March 31, 2006, the Company did not engage in any off-balance sheet arrangements as defined in Item 303(c) of Regulation S-B.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

Our discussion and analysis or results of operation is based upon our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period, and related disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities for the periods indicated. The notes to the financial statements contained herein describe our significant accounting policies used in the preparation of the financial statements. On an on-going basis, we evaluate our estimates, including, but not limited to, those related to our allowance for doubtful accounts, inventory valuations, the lives and continued usefulness of

furniture, fixtures and leasehold improvements, deferred tax assets and contingencies. Due to uncertainties, however, it is at least reasonably possible that management’s estimates will change during the next year, which cannot be estimated. Realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon the generation of future taxable income during the periods in which those temporary differences become deductible. Management considers the scheduled reversal of deferred tax liabilities and projected future taxable income in making this assessment. Actual future operating results, as well as changes in future performance, could have a material adverse impact on the valuation reserves. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results could differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

In November 2004, FASB issued SFAS No. 151 “Inventory Costs” (SFAS No. 151) which amends the guidance in ARB No. 43 (ARB 43), Chapter 4 “Inventory Pricing,” to clarify the accounting for abnormal amounts of idle facility expense, freight, handling costs, and wasted material (spoilage). Paragraph 5 of ARB 43, Chapter 4, previously stated that under some circumstances, items such as idle facility expense, excessive spoilage, double freight, and rehandling costs may be so abnormal as to require treatment as current period charges. SFAS No. 151 requires that those items be recognized as current-period charges regardless of whether they meet the criterion of “so abnormal.” In addition, SFAS No. 151 requires that allocation of fixed production overheads to the costs of conversion be based on the normal capacity of the production facilities. SFAS No. 151 shall be effective for inventory costs incurred during fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2005. Earlier application is permitted for inventory costs incurred during fiscal years beginning after the date SFAS No. 151 was issued. SFAS No. 151 shall be applied prospectively. The adoption of SFAS No. 151 did not have a material effect on the consolidated financial statements.

In December 2004, FASB issued SFAS No. 123 (revised 2004), “Share-Based Payment,” (SFAS No. 123R) that focuses primarily on accounting for transactions in which an entity obtains employee services in shared-based payment transactions. This statement replaces SFAS No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation,” and supersedes APB Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock issued to Employees.” Beginning October 1, 2006, we are required to expense the fair value of employee stock options and similar awards. As a public company we were allowed to select from two alternative transition methods, each having different reporting implications. The Company did not expect the adoption of SFAS No. 123R to have a material effect on the consolidated financial statements based on options outstanding at March 31, 2006 are fully vested.

ITEM 3. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

As of March 31, 2006, the Company carried out an evaluation, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended). Based upon that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer at the time concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective in alerting them on a timely basis to material information required to be disclosed in our periodic reports to the Securities and Exchange Commission. During the first two quarters of fiscal year 2006, there were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that have materially affected, or reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

Part II.

ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

The matters have been consolidated for purposes of discovery, which began in November 2003 and is expected to be completed by November 1, 2006, with the trials currently scheduled to

commence later in 2007. At this time, the Company cannot state with any degree of certainty what the outcome of these matters will be or the amount or range of potential loss, if any. The Company will vigorously defend these matters.

ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS

The Company’s Annual Shareholders’ Meeting was held on March 16, 2006. The only proposal voted upon was the election of five directors to serve on the Company’s Board of Directors. The total number of shares voted was 5,056,945 or 65.7% of the eligible shares and the results were as follows:

Director	For	Withhold	Total
Adams, Thomas H.	5,035,590	21,355	5,056,945
Brandt, Darrel D.	5,032,690	24,255	5,056,945
Nelson, Robert L.	5,032,590	24,355	5,056,945
Popov, Boris	5,032,690	24,255	5,056,945
Underwood, Edward L.	5,034,690	22,255	5,056,945

PART I	Consolidated Financial Information

Item 1	Consolidated Financial Statements

	Consolidated Balance Sheets as of March 31, 2006 (unaudited) and September 30, 2005 (audited)

	Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three and six months ended March 31, 2006 and 2005 (unaudited)

	Consolidated Statements of Cash Flow for the three and six months ended March 31, 2006 and 2005 (unaudited)

	Notes to consolidated financial statements

Item 2	Management’s Discussion and Analysis or Plan of Operation

Item 3	Controls and Procedures

PART II	Other Information

Item 1	Legal Proceedings

Item 4	Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

Item 6	Exhibits

	Signatures

Exhibit Number		Description
10.1		Amendement to Purchase and Supply Agreement by and between Ballistic Recovery Systems, Inc. and Cirrus Design Corporation dated as of February 3, 2006.
31.1		Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Principal Executive Officer.
31.2		Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Principal Accounting Officer.
32.1		Section 1350 Certification of Principal Executive Officer.
32.2		Section 1350 Certification of Principal Accounting Officer.

Date: May 19, 2006	/s/ Larry E. Williams
	By Larry E. Williams
	Principal Executive Officer


	/s/ Don R. Hedquist
	By Don R. Hedquist
	Principal Accounting Officer