EX-99.1

In September 2014, we announced plans to separate our Payments business and our Marketplaces business. The separation will occur by means of a distribution of a newly formed corporation named PayPal Holdings, Inc. (“PayPal”), which will contain the businesses that make up our Payments segment. eBay, the existing publicly traded corporation, will continue to operate our Marketplaces business. As two distinct publicly traded corporations, eBay and PayPal will be better positioned to capitalize on significant growth opportunities and focus their resources on their respective businesses and strategic priorities.

eBay and PayPal are two great businesses with leading global positions in commerce and payments, respectively. For more than a decade, eBay and PayPal have mutually benefited from being part of one company, creating substantial stockholder value. As part of its strategic planning process, the board of directors has assessed whether eBay and PayPal should remain together. Until September 2014, the combination of the two businesses and the synergies and benefits they offered to each other were so valuable that the board determined that separation was not appropriate. But the commerce and payments landscape is rapidly changing, and each business faces different competitive opportunities and challenges. Consequently, in September 2014 the board decided to separate the businesses. As independent companies, we expect eBay and PayPal will be sharper and stronger, and more focused and competitive as leading, standalone companies in their respective markets. eBay and PayPal also will benefit from additional flexibility and agility to pursue new market and partnership opportunities.

The new eBay will be a global commerce leader and, we believe, the most inspiring and engaging place to discover great value and unique selection anytime, anywhere. We have an incredibly strong position, with 155 million active buyers globally as of the end of 2014. In 2014, eBay Marketplaces handled approximately $83 billion of gross merchandise volume, growing 9% year over year. Additionally, eBay is one of the world’s top 30 global brands. Offering consumers worldwide extraordinary value and selection, eBay had more than 800 million live listings at the end of 2014, and approximately 80% of sold items are new. And the company is well-positioned as a leader in the growth areas of mobile and cross-border commerce. With over 250 million eBay app downloads since inception, eBay generated $28 billion in mobile volume in 2014. During the same time, cross-border commerce represented approximately 17% of eBay’s gross merchandise volume, and 60% of Marketplaces’ revenue was international. Looking ahead, eBay will continue to focus on enhancing its unique assets and capabilities and creating new commerce experiences to ensure long-term growth and on-going commerce leadership.

The separation will provide current eBay stockholders with equity ownership in both eBay and PayPal. We expect that the distribution of PayPal common stock will be tax-free, for U.S. federal income tax purposes, to eBay stockholders.

The separation will be effected by means of a pro rata distribution of 100% of the outstanding shares of PayPal common stock to holders of eBay common stock. Each eBay stockholder will receive one share of PayPal common stock for each share of eBay common stock held as of the close of business on July 8, 2015, the record date for the distribution. No vote of eBay stockholders is required for the distribution. You do not need to take any action to receive shares of PayPal common stock to which you are entitled as an eBay stockholder, and you do not need to pay any consideration or surrender or exchange your shares of eBay common stock.

We encourage you to read the attached information statement, which is being provided to all eBay stockholders who held shares of eBay common stock on the record date for the distribution. The information statement describes the separation in detail and contains important business and financial information about PayPal.

We believe the separation provides tremendous opportunities for our businesses and our stockholders, as we work to continue building long-term stockholder value. We appreciate your continuing support of eBay, and look forward to your future support of both companies.

It is my pleasure to welcome you as a future stockholder of our company, PayPal Holdings, Inc. Following the distribution of all of the outstanding shares of PayPal common stock by eBay Inc. to its stockholders, PayPal will be an independent, publicly traded company focused on making money work better for people and businesses around the world.

The access to and movement of money is an important market that affects the lives of almost everyone. Our mission is to increase our relevance for consumers, merchants, friends and family to access and move their money anywhere in the world, anytime, on any platform and through any device (e.g., mobile, tablets, personal computers or wearables).

We operate a proprietary global technology platform that connects merchants and consumers around the globe. In 2014, approximately 162 million active customer accounts processed payments on our platform. Total payment volume over the last 12 months increased by 26% to $235 billion, as more consumers and merchants trusted PayPal to pay and get paid. We have significant global reach, processing transactions in more than 200 markets, allowing our customers to receive payments in more than 100 currencies, withdraw funds to their bank accounts in 57 currencies and hold balances in their PayPal accounts in 26 currencies. We are a leader in mobile payments and processed nearly 1 billion mobile transactions in 2014 for our customers.

Our stockholder value proposition is simple. We strive to provide superior returns to PayPal stockholders by maintaining our leadership position in the payments industry and investing in the growth of our newly standalone company.

We invite you to learn more about PayPal, our business and our strategic initiatives by reading the enclosed information statement. We urge you to read the information statement carefully and in its entirety. We are excited by the tremendous opportunity we have in front of us and look forward to your support as a holder of our common stock.

Information contained herein is subject to completion or amendment. A Registration Statement on Form 10 relating to these securities has been filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission under the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

This information statement is being furnished in connection with the distribution by eBay Inc. (“eBay”) to its stockholders of all of the outstanding shares of common stock of PayPal Holdings, Inc. (“PayPal”), a wholly owned subsidiary of eBay that will hold directly or indirectly the assets and liabilities associated with eBay’s Payments business. To implement the distribution, eBay will distribute all of the shares of PayPal common stock on a pro rata basis to eBay stockholders in a transaction that is intended to qualify as tax-free for U.S. federal income tax purposes. Please refer to the “Presentation of Information” below for how we refer to “eBay Inc.,” “eBay” and “PayPal” in this Information Statement.

You will receive one share of PayPal common stock for each share of eBay common stock held of record by you as of the close of business on July 8, 2015, the record date for the distribution. As discussed under “The Separation and Distribution—Trading Between the Record Date and Distribution Date,” if you sell your eBay common stock in the “regular-way” market after the record date and before the distribution, you also will be selling your right to receive shares of PayPal common stock in connection with the separation. The separation and distribution is subject to the satisfaction (or to the extent waiveable, waiver by eBay in its sole discretion) of certain conditions set forth in more detail in this information statement. Subject to the satisfaction or waiver of these conditions, PayPal expects the shares of PayPal common stock to be distributed by eBay to you at 11:59 p.m., Eastern Time, on July 17, 2015. We refer to the date of the distribution of the shares of PayPal common stock as the “distribution date.”

No vote of eBay stockholders is required for the distribution. Therefore, you are not being asked for a proxy, and you are requested not to send eBay a proxy, in connection with the distribution. You do not need to pay any consideration, exchange or surrender your existing shares of eBay common stock or take any other action to receive your shares of PayPal common stock.

There is no current trading market for PayPal common stock, although PayPal expects that a limited market, commonly known as a “when-issued” trading market, will develop on or shortly before the record date for the distribution, and PayPal expects “regular-way” trading of PayPal common stock to begin on the first trading day following the completion of the distribution. PayPal has applied to have its common stock authorized for listing on The NASDAQ Stock Market under the symbol “PYPL.” Following the spin-off, eBay common stock will continue to trade on The NASDAQ Stock Market under the symbol “EBAY.”

In reviewing this information statement, you should carefully consider the matters described under the caption “Risk Factors” beginning on page 16.

Neither the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission nor any state securities commission has approved or disapproved these securities or determined if this information statement is truthful or complete. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal offense.

This information statement does not constitute an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy any securities.

This information statement was first mailed to eBay stockholders on or about [●], 2015.

On September 30, 2014, eBay Inc. (“eBay”) announced its intent to separate its payments business into an independent, publicly-traded company. To accomplish this separation, in January 2015, eBay incorporated PayPal Holdings, Inc. (“PayPal Holdings”), which will become the parent of PayPal, Inc. and will hold directly or indirectly all of the assets and liabilities associated with PayPal, Inc. References to “we,” “our,” “us,” “the Company” or “PayPal” refer to the combined entities of the payments business of eBay, including PayPal, Inc. and certain other assets and liabilities that have been historically held at the eBay corporate level, but are specifically identifiable and attributable to the payments business.

PayPal owns or has rights to use the trademarks, service marks and trade names that it uses in conjunction with the operation of its business. Some of the more important trademarks that PayPal owns or has rights to use that appear in this information statement include: PayPal^®, Braintree and Venmo, which may be registered or trademarked in the United States and other jurisdictions. PayPal’s rights to some of these trademarks may be limited to select markets. Each trademark, trade name or service mark of any other company appearing in this information statement is, to PayPal’s knowledge, owned by such other company.

INFORMATION STATEMENT SUMMARY

Except as otherwise indicated or unless the context otherwise requires, the information included in this information statement about PayPal assumes the completion of all of the transactions referred to in this information statement in connection with the separation and distribution. Unless the context otherwise requires, references in this information statement to “PayPal” refer to PayPal Holdings, Inc., a Delaware corporation, and its combined subsidiaries. References to PayPal’s historical business and operations refer to the business and operations of eBay’s Payments business that will be transferred to PayPal in connection with the separation and distribution. References in this information statement to “eBay” refer to eBay Inc., a Delaware corporation, and its consolidated subsidiaries, which prior to the distribution, but not after such date, includes the business and operations of PayPal.

PayPal

PayPal is a leading technology platform company that enables digital and mobile payments on behalf of consumers and merchants worldwide. We put our customers at the center of everything we do. We strive to increase our relevance for consumers, merchants, friends and family to access and move their money anywhere in the world, anytime, on any platform and through any device (e.g., mobile, tablets, personal computers or wearables). We provide safer and simpler ways for businesses of all sizes to accept payments from merchant websites, mobile devices and applications, and at offline retail locations through a wide range of payment solutions across our Payments Platform, including PayPal, PayPal Credit, Venmo and Braintree products.

We enable global commerce by providing payment solutions for our approximately 162 million active customer accounts in over 200 markets, while providing customers a choice of how they would like to pay or get paid. A market is a geographic area or political jurisdiction, such as a country, territory or protectorate, in which we offer our services. A country, territory or protectorate is identified by a distinct set of laws and regulations. An active customer account is a registered account that successfully sent or received at least one payment or payment reversal through our Payments Platform, excluding transactions processed through our gateway products, in the past 12 months. Our gateway products include our Payflow Payments and certain Braintree products. A payment gateway links a merchant’s website to that merchant’s processing network and merchant account.

We offer our customers the flexibility to use their account to both purchase and be paid for goods, as well as transfer and withdraw funds. A consumer can typically fund a purchase using a bank account, a PayPal account balance, a PayPal Credit account, a credit or debit card, or other stored value products such as coupons and gift cards. Our PayPal and Venmo products also make it safer and simpler for friends and family to transfer funds to each other using several of these funding sources. We offer merchants an end-to-end payments solution that provides authorization and settlement capabilities, as well as instant access to funds. We help merchants connect with their customers and manage risk. We measure the relevance of our products in the lives of our customers, and therefore the success of our business, through both payment volume and payment transactions. Payment volume is the value of payments, net of payment reversals, successfully completed through our Payments Platform, excluding transactions processed through our gateway products (“Total Payment Volume” or “TPV”). During 2014, our TPV was approximately $235 billion, representing growth of 26% over 2013. “Payment transactions” is the total number of payments, net of payment reversals, successfully completed through our Payments Platform, excluding transactions processed through our gateway products. During 2014, payment transactions were approximately 4.0 billion, representing growth of 22% over 2013.

LOGO

Our Payments Platform is built to make the existing global financial infrastructure work for people in the digital age. PayPal allows people to make seamless transactions between different markets and networks. Our Payments Platform connects with financial institutions around the world, and allows consumers to make purchases using a broad range of payment methods, regardless of where a merchant is located. Consumers who use our Payments Platform can engage in cross-border shopping by sending payments to each other in over 200 markets across the globe and in more than 100 currencies. This enables merchants to increase sales volume by allowing them to sell across borders to a much larger base of consumers.

earn revenue by providing value added services to consumers and merchants, such as PayPal Credit products. Our revenue growth is influenced by, among other things, consumer spending patterns, merchant adoption of payment methods other than traditional credit and debit cards and cash, the expansion of multi-channel retail, the growth of mobile devices and merchant applications on those devices, the growth of consumers with access to the internet globally, the pace of transition from paper-based forms of payment to digital forms of payment, our share of the digital payments market, and our ability to innovate new methods of payment that merchants and consumers find to be valuable. Our strategy is to drive revenue growth by:

•

Growing our core businesses globally through expanding our base of active customer accounts, increasing our customers’ use of our products and services by better addressing our customers’ everyday needs in managing and moving money and expanding the adoption of our solutions by new merchants and consumers;

•

Diversifying our existing business by seeking new areas of growth in markets around the world and focusing on innovation both in the digital and the physical world;

•

Providing software application developers with tools to quickly and easily integrate PayPal’s smart payment solutions into merchant and next generation mobile applications; and

•

Leveraging the data we accumulate through processing transactions to build strong risk capabilities that enable the identification of illegal, high-risk, or fraudulent transactions with the highest level of accuracy, without impacting legitimate transactions and while incurring minimal losses.

LOGO

We operate globally and in a rapidly evolving regulatory environment characterized by a heightened regulatory focus on all aspects of the payments industry. Some of the laws and regulations to which we are subject were enacted recently and many such laws and regulations, including those enacted prior to the advent of digital and mobile payments, are continuing to evolve through legislative and regulatory action and judicial interpretation. Changes in or non-compliance with laws and regulations, changes in the interpretation of laws and regulations, and the enactment of new laws and regulations applicable to us could have a material adverse impact on our business. Therefore, we monitor these areas closely to ensure compliant solutions for our customers who depend on us.

Summary of Risk Factors

An investment in our common stock is subject to a number of risks, including risks relating to PayPal’s business, results of operations and financial condition, risks related to the separation and risks related to our common stock. Set forth below are some, but not all, of these risks. Please read the information in the section captioned “Risk Factors” for a more thorough description of these and other risks.

Risks Related to PayPal’s Business, Results of Operations and Financial Condition

•

Our operating and financial results come primarily from transactions involving payments made in a reporting period and are therefore subject to fluctuations that could adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows, as well as the trading price of our common stock.

•

Global and regional economic conditions could harm our business.

•

Our success depends to a large degree on our ability to successfully address the rapidly evolving market for transactions on mobile devices.

•

If we cannot keep pace with rapid technological developments to provide new and innovative programs, products and services, the use of our products and our revenues could decline.

•

Changes in how consumers fund their PayPal transactions could harm our business.

•

Our business is subject to online security risks, including security breaches.

•

Systems failures and resulting interruptions in the availability of our websites, applications, products or services could harm our business.

•

Changes to payment card networks or bank fees, rules, or practices could harm our business.

•

Failure to deal effectively with fraud, fictitious transactions, bad transactions, and negative customer experiences would increase our loss rate and harm our business, and could severely diminish merchant and consumer confidence in and use of our services.

•

Any factors that reduce cross-border trade or make such trade more difficult could harm our business.

•

Our business is subject to extensive government regulation and oversight relating to the provision of financial services.

•

We are subject to consumer protection laws and regulations.

•

We are subject to anti-money laundering and counter-terrorist financing laws and regulations.

•

Regulation in the areas of privacy and protection of user data could harm our business.

•

PayPal is not a bank or licensed lender in the United States and relies upon third parties to make loans and provide the other products critical to our business.

•

Our credit products expose us to additional risks.

•

New and proposed laws and regulations could harm our business.

•

Substantial and increasingly intense competition worldwide in the global payments industry may harm our business.

Risks Related to the Separation

•

The distribution of PayPal common stock may be delayed or rescinded if certain required regulatory approvals are not obtained.

•

The combined post-separation value of eBay and PayPal common stock may not equal or exceed the pre-separation value of eBay common stock.

•

We may not achieve some or all of the expected benefits of the separation, and the separation could harm our business.

•

If the distribution, together with certain related transactions, does not qualify as a transaction that is generally tax-free for U.S. federal income tax purposes under Sections 368(a)(1)(D) and 355 of the Internal Revenue Code, or the “Code,” eBay, PayPal and eBay stockholders could be subject to significant tax liabilities and, in certain circumstances, we could be required to indemnify eBay for material taxes pursuant to indemnification obligations under the tax matters agreement.

•

eBay will be a significant source of our revenues after the distribution.

Risks Related to our Common Stock

•

We cannot be certain that an active trading market for our common stock will develop or be sustained after the separation, and following the separation, and the price of our common stock may fluctuate significantly.

•

There may be substantial changes in our stockholder base.

The Separation and Distribution

On September 30, 2014, eBay announced its intent to separate its Payments business and its Marketplaces business into two independent, publicly traded companies—PayPal and eBay. The separation will occur by means of a pro rata distribution to the eBay stockholders of 100% of the shares of common stock of PayPal, which was formed to own and operate eBay’s Payments business.

On June 26, 2015, the eBay board of directors approved the distribution of all of PayPal’s issued and outstanding shares of common stock on the basis of one share of PayPal common stock for each share of eBay common stock held as of the close of business on July 8, 2015, the record date for the distribution.

PayPal’s Post-Separation Relationship with eBay

After the distribution, eBay and PayPal will be separate companies with separate management teams and separate boards of directors. PayPal will have entered into a separation and distribution agreement with eBay, which is referred to in this information statement as the “separation agreement” or the “separation and distribution agreement.” In connection with the separation, PayPal will also enter into various other agreements to effect the separation and provide a framework for its relationship with eBay after the separation, such as an operating agreement, a transition services agreement, a tax matters agreement, an employee matters agreement, an intellectual property matters agreement, colocation services agreements, a data sharing addendum and a product development agreement. These agreements will provide for the allocation between PayPal and eBay of eBay’s assets, employees, liabilities and obligations (including its investments, property and employee benefits and tax-related assets and liabilities) attributable to periods prior to, at and after PayPal’s separation from eBay and will govern key relationships between PayPal and eBay after the separation. For additional information regarding the separation agreement and other transaction agreements, see the sections entitled “Risk Factors—Risks Related to the Separation” and “Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions.”

Reasons for the Separation

In the past, the eBay Inc. board of directors has considered whether and when it would make sense to separate PayPal from eBay. Until September 2014, the combination of the two businesses and the synergies and benefits they offered to each other were so valuable that the board determined that separation was not appropriate. The eBay board of directors believes that the creation of two independent public companies, with the

new PayPal operating eBay’s Payments business, and eBay operating the Marketplaces business is in the best interests of eBay and its stockholders for a number of reasons. The eBay board of directors believes that:

•

The separation will allow each business to more effectively pursue its own distinct operating priorities, strategies and opportunities for long-term growth and profitability in the global commerce and payments landscape.

•

The separation will speed up decision-making at each company and allow each to adapt more quickly to the rapidly changing market and customer dynamics in their respective markets.

•

The separation will provide each company with increased flexibility to pursue new partnership and strategic opportunities that may have previously been unavailable for strategic or other reasons.

•

The separation will permit each company to implement a capital structure appropriate to its strategy and business needs and to concentrate its financial resources solely on its own operations, providing greater flexibility to invest capital in its business in a time and manner appropriate for its distinct strategy and business needs. This will facilitate a more efficient allocation of capital.

•

The separation will facilitate incentive compensation arrangements for employees more directly tied to the performance of each company’s business, and enhance employee hiring and retention by, among other things, improving the alignment of management and employee incentives with performance and growth objectives.

•

The separation will provide each company with direct access to capital markets and facilitate the ability for each to capitalize on its unique growth opportunities and effect future acquisitions utilizing its common stock.

•

The separation will allow investors to separately value eBay and PayPal based on their distinct investment identities, including the merits, performance, growth profile, and future prospects of their respective businesses. The separation will also provide investors with two distinct and targeted investment opportunities.

The eBay board of directors also considered a number of potentially negative factors in evaluating the creation of independent public companies, including, among others, risks relating to the loss of synergy benefits between eBay and PayPal, and increased operating costs and one-time separation costs relating to the creation of a new public company, but concluded that certain of the synergy benefits could be preserved, at least for some significant period of time, through the operating and other agreements and that the potential benefits from separation outweighed these factors. For more information, see the sections entitled “The Separation and Distribution—Reasons for the Separation” and “Risk Factors” included elsewhere in this information statement.

Corporate Information

PayPal Holdings, Inc. was incorporated in Delaware in January 2015 for the purpose of owning and operating eBay’s Payments business in connection with the separation and distribution described herein. Prior to the contribution of this business to PayPal, which will occur prior to the distribution, PayPal will have no operations. The address of PayPal’s principal executive offices is PayPal Holdings, Inc., 2211 North First Street, San Jose, California 95131. PayPal’s telephone number after the distribution will be (408) 967-1000. PayPal maintains an Internet site at www.paypal.com, and its investor relations site will be accessible prior to the distribution at http://investor.paypal-corp.com. PayPal’s websites and the information contained therein or connected thereto shall not be deemed to be incorporated herein, and you should not rely on any such information in making an investment decision.

Reason for Furnishing this Information Statement

This information statement is being furnished solely to provide information to stockholders of eBay who will receive shares of PayPal common stock in the distribution. It is not and is not to be construed as an inducement or encouragement to buy or sell any of PayPal’s securities. The information contained in this information statement is believed by PayPal to be accurate as of the date set forth on the cover of this information statement. Changes may occur after that date and neither eBay nor PayPal will update the information except in the normal course of their respective disclosure obligations and practices, or as required by applicable law.

Summary Historical and Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined Financial Data

The following summary financial data reflects the combined operations of PayPal. PayPal derived the summary combined statement of income data for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012, and summary combined balance sheet data as of December 31, 2014 and 2013, as set forth below, from its audited combined financial statements, included elsewhere in this information statement. PayPal derived the summary combined statement of income data for the quarter ended March 31, 2015 and 2014 and summary combined balance sheet data as of March 31, 2015, as set forth below, from its unaudited combined financial statements, included elsewhere in this information statement. PayPal derived the summary combined balance sheet data as of March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2012 from PayPal’s underlying financial records, which were derived from the financial records of eBay. The historical results do not necessarily indicate the results expected for any future period. To ensure a full understanding of this summary financial data, you should read the summary combined financial data presented below in conjunction with “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and the combined financial statements and accompanying notes included elsewhere in this information statement.

The summary unaudited pro forma condensed combined balance sheet data as of March 31, 2015 has been prepared to reflect the separation as of March 31, 2015. The unaudited pro forma condensed combined statement of income data presented for the year ended December 31, 2014 and for the quarter ended March 31, 2015 assumes the spin-off occurred on January 1, 2014. The assumptions used and pro forma adjustments derived from such assumptions are based on currently available information and PayPal believes such assumptions are reasonable under the circumstances.

The unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial statements may not be indicative of PayPal’s results of operations or financial condition had the distribution and its anticipated post-separation capital structure been completed on the dates assumed. Also, they may not reflect the results of operations or financial condition that would have resulted had PayPal been operating as an independent, publicly traded company during such periods. In addition, they are not necessarily indicative of its future results of operations or financial condition.

Historical basic and diluted earnings per share are not presented because PayPal’s financial information has been prepared on a combined basis. These financial statements have not been prepared for a single legal entity that had share capital throughout the entire historical period and, accordingly, earnings per share for these periods has not been provided.

You should read this summary financial data together with “Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined Financial Statements,” “Capitalization,” “Selected Historical Combined Financial Data of PayPal,” “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and the combined financial statements and accompanying notes included in this information statement.


	3 Months Ended March 31,							Year Ended December 31,
	Pro Forma 2015		2015		2014			Pro Forma 2014		2014		2013		2012
	(In millions)							(In millions)
Combined statement of income data
Net revenue	$	2,134	$	2,137	$	1,874		$	8,012	$	8,025	$	6,727	$	5,662
Operating income		314		322		318			1,237		1,268		1,091		880
Net income		248		255		(382	)		391		419		955		778

Pro forma earnings per share
Basic		$0.20							$0.31
Diluted		$0.20							$0.31

	3 Months Ended March 31,									Year Ended December 31,
	Pro Forma 2015		2015		2014					2014		2013		2012
	(In millions)									(In millions)
Combined balance sheet data
Cash and cash equivalents	$	6,165	$	2,365	$	2,198				$	2,201	$	1,604	$	1,414
Current assets		21,381		18,207		15,382					17,565		14,620		12,403
Non-current assets		4,563		4,372		4,451					4,352		4,540		3,780
Total assets		25,944		22,579		19,833					21,917		19,160		16,183
Current liabilities		12,797		13,549		12,252					13,283		11,261		9,574
Long term liabilities		618		390		461					386		509		428
Total liabilities		13,415		13,939		12,713					13,669		11,770		10,002
Total equity		12,529		8,640		7,120					8,248		7,390		6,181

The following discussion is divided into three sections. The first section, which begins immediately following this paragraph, discusses some of the risks that may affect our business, results of operations and financial condition. The second section, captioned “Risk Related to the Separation,” discusses some of the risks relating to our plan to separate PayPal into an independent publicly traded company. The third section, captioned “Risks Related to Our Common Stock,” discusses some of the risks relating to an investment in PayPal’s Common Stock. You should carefully review all of these sections, as well as our combined financial statements and notes thereto and the other information appearing in this report, for important information regarding risks that affect us.

Risk Factors That May Affect Our Business, Results of Operations and Financial Condition

Our operating and financial results have varied on a quarterly basis during our operating history and may continue to fluctuate significantly as a result of a variety of factors, including as a result of the risks set forth in this “Risk Factors” section. It is difficult for us to forecast the level or source of our revenues or earnings (loss) accurately. In view of the rapidly evolving nature of our business, period-to-period comparisons of our operating results may not be meaningful, and you should not rely upon them as an indication of future performance. We do not have backlog, and substantially all of our net revenues each quarter come primarily from transactions involving payments during that quarter. Due to the inherent difficulty in forecasting revenues, it is also difficult to forecast expenses as a percentage of net revenues. Quarterly and annual expenses as a percentage of net revenues reflected in our combined financial statements may be significantly different from historical or projected rates. Our operating results in one or more future quarters may fall below the expectations of securities analysts and investors. The trading price of our common stock could decline, perhaps substantially, as a result of the factors described in this paragraph.

Our operations and performance depend significantly on global and regional economic conditions. Adverse economic conditions and events (including volatility or distress in the equity and/or debt or credit markets and fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates) have in the past negatively impacted regional and global financial markets and will likely continue to do so from time to time in the future. These events and conditions could have a negative and adverse impact on the companies and customers with which we do business. In addition, financial turmoil affecting the banking system or financial markets could cause additional consolidation of the financial services industry, or significant financial service institution failures, new or incremental tightening in the credit markets, low liquidity, and extreme volatility in fixed income, credit, currency, and equity markets. Adverse impacts to the companies and customers with which we do business, the banking system, or financial markets could have a material adverse effect on our business, including a reduction in the volume and prices of transactions on our payments platforms.

Our success depends to a large degree on our ability to successfully address the rapidly evolving market for transactions on mobile devices.

Mobile devices are increasingly used for ecommerce transactions and payments. A significant and growing portion of our customers access our platforms through mobile devices. We may lose customers if we are not able to continue to meet our customers’ mobile and multi-screen experience expectations. The variety of technical and other configurations across different mobile devices and platforms increases the challenges associated with this environment. In addition, a number of other companies with significant resources and a number of innovative startups have introduced products and services focusing on mobile markets.

Our ability to successfully address the challenges posed by the rapidly evolving market for mobile transactions is crucial to our continued success, and any failure to continuously increase the volume of mobile transactions effected through our platforms could harm our business.

If we cannot keep pace with rapid technological developments to provide new and innovative programs, products and services, the use of our products and our revenues could decline.

Rapid, significant technological changes continue to confront the industries in which we operate, including developments in smart cards, tokenization, ecommerce, mobile, and radio frequency and proximity payment devices, such as contactless payments. We cannot predict the effect of technological changes on our business. In addition to our own initiatives and innovations, we rely in part on third parties, including some of our competitors, for the development of and access to new technologies. We expect that new services and technologies applicable to the industries in which we operate will continue to emerge. These new services and technologies may be superior to, or render obsolete, the technologies we currently use in our products and services. Incorporating new technologies into our products and services may require substantial expenditures and take considerable time, and ultimately may not be successful. In addition, our ability to adopt new services and develop new technologies may be inhibited by industry-wide standards, payments networks, new laws and regulations, resistance to change from consumers or merchants, or third parties’ intellectual property rights. Our success will depend on our ability to develop new technologies and adapt to technological changes and evolving industry standards.

Changes in how consumers fund their PayPal transactions could harm our business.

We pay significant transaction fees when consumers fund payment transactions using credit cards, lower fees when consumers fund payments with debit cards, nominal fees when consumers fund payment transactions by electronic transfer of funds from bank accounts, and no fees when consumers fund payment transactions from an existing PayPal account balance or through the PayPal Credit products. Our financial success is highly sensitive to changes in the rate at which our consumers fund payments using credit and debit cards, which can significantly increase our costs. Some of our consumers may prefer to use credit and debit cards if these cards offer functionality and benefits not associated with the use of their bank accounts. Some of our offerings, including the ability of consumers to make a limited number of “guest” payments without opening a PayPal account, have a higher rate of payment card funding than our basic product offering. An increase in the portion of our payment volume using credit and debit cards would materially and adversely affect our financial performance. Some of our plans to lower our funding costs, including both the PayPal Credit products and the ability for consumers to defer payment for a short period of time on some transactions, may increase the risk to us of nonpayment by consumers. An increase in fees associated with our funding mix or in losses associated with nonpayment by consumers could harm our business.

Our business is subject to online security risks, including security breaches.

Our business involves the storage and transmission of customers’ personal financial information. In addition, a significant number of our customers authorize us to bill their payment card accounts directly for all transaction and other fees charged by us. We have built our reputation on the premise that our payments platform offers customers a secure way to make payments. An increasing number of websites, including those owned by several other large Internet and offline companies, have disclosed breaches of their security, some of which have involved sophisticated and highly targeted attacks on portions of their websites or infrastructure. In May 2014, eBay Inc. publicly announced that criminals were able to penetrate and steal certain data, including user names, encrypted user passwords and other non-financial user data from certain of its Marketplaces business unit databases, which led to Marketplaces requiring a password reset and fewer transactions using our PayPal services. A breach of security at PayPal could have negative consequences to our reputation, which could result in our customers using our services less often, and have significant out-of-pocket financial impact.

The techniques used to obtain unauthorized access, disable, or degrade service, or sabotage systems, change frequently, may be difficult to detect for a long time, and often are not recognized until launched against a target. Certain efforts may be state sponsored and supported by significant financial and technological resources and therefore may be even more difficult to detect. As a result, we may be unable to anticipate these techniques or to implement adequate preventative measures. Unauthorized parties may also attempt to gain access to our systems or facilities through various means, including hacking into our systems or facilities, fraud, trickery or other means of deceiving our employees, contractors and temporary staff. A party that is able to circumvent our security measures could misappropriate our or our customers’ personal proprietary information, cause interruption in our operations and damage our computers or those of our customers. In addition, our customers have been and likely will continue to be targeted by parties using fraudulent “spoof” and “phishing” emails to misappropriate user names, passwords, payment card numbers, or other personal information or to introduce viruses or other malware through “trojan horse” programs to our customers’ computers. Also, our information technology and infrastructure may be vulnerable to cyberattacks or security incidents and third parties may be able to access our customers’ proprietary information and payment card data that are stored on or accessible through our systems. Any security breach at a company providing services to us or our customers could have similar effects. Because we promote to our customers that our payments platform offers a secure way to make payments, a security breach would have a significant impact on our reputation.

In addition, under payment card rules and our contracts with our card processors, if there is a breach of payment card information that we store, or that is stored by our direct payment card processing customers, we could be liable to the payment card issuing banks for their cost of issuing new cards and related expenses. If we were unable to accept payment cards, our business would be harmed. Additionally, financial services regulators in various jurisdictions, including the United States and the European Union, have implemented or are considering proposals to impose new authentication requirements on banks and payment processors intended to reduce online fraud, which could impose significant costs, require us to change our business practices, make it more difficult for new customers to join PayPal, and reduce the ease of use of our products, which could harm our business.

We may also need to expend significant additional resources to protect against security breaches or to redress problems caused by breaches. These issues are likely to become more difficult and costly as we expand the number of markets where we operate. Additionally, our insurance policies carry low coverage limits, which may not be adequate to reimburse us for losses caused by security breaches and we may not be able to fully collect, if at all, under these insurance policies.

Systems failures and resulting interruptions in the availability of our websites, applications, products or services could harm our business.

Our systems may experience service interruptions or degradation because of hardware and software defects or malfunctions, computer denial-of-service and other cyberattacks, human error, earthquakes, hurricanes, floods, fires, natural disasters, power losses, disruptions in telecommunications services, fraud, military or political conflicts, terrorist attacks, computer viruses, or other events. Our systems are also subject to break-ins, sabotage and intentional acts of vandalism. Some of our systems are not fully redundant and our disaster recovery planning is not sufficient for all eventualities. In addition, as a provider of payments solutions, we are subject to increased scrutiny by regulators that may require specific business continuity and disaster recovery plans and more rigorous testing of such plans. This increased scrutiny may be costly and time consuming and may divert our resources from other business priorities.

We have experienced and will likely continue to experience system failures, denial of service attacks and other events or conditions from time to time that interrupt the availability or reduce the speed or functionality of our websites and mobile applications. These events have resulted and likely will result in loss of revenue. A prolonged interruption in the availability or reduction in the speed or other functionality of our websites and mobile applications could materially harm our business. Frequent or persistent interruptions in our services could

cause current or potential customers to believe that our systems are unreliable, leading them to switch to our competitors or to avoid our sites, and could permanently harm our reputation and brands. Moreover, to the extent that any system failure or similar event results in damages to our customers or their businesses, these customers could seek significant compensation from us for their losses and those claims, even if unsuccessful, would likely be time-consuming and costly for us to address.

Our website has suffered significant intermittent unavailability, including for example, transaction failures which affected some customers in the United Kingdom for over 24 hours in August 2014 and mobile login failures which affected some customers for several hours in April 2014. Reliability is particularly critical for us because the full-time availability of our PayPal services is critical to our goal of gaining widespread acceptance among consumers and merchants for digital and mobile payments. We have undertaken certain system upgrades and re-platforming efforts designed to improve our reliability and speed. These efforts are costly and time consuming, involve significant technical risk and may divert our resources from new features and products, and there can be no guarantee that these efforts will succeed. Because we are a regulated financial institution, frequent or persistent site interruptions could lead to regulatory scrutiny, significant fines and penalties, or mandatory and costly changes to our business practices, and ultimately could cause us to lose existing licenses we need to operate or prevent us from obtaining additional licenses that we need to expand.

We also rely on facilities, components and services supplied by third parties, including eBay, and our business may be materially adversely affected to the extent these components or services do not meet our expectations or these third parties cease to provide the services or facilities. In particular, a decision by any of our third party hosting providers to close a facility that we use could cause system interruptions and delays, result in loss of critical data and cause lengthy interruptions in our services. We do not carry business interruption insurance sufficient to compensate us for losses that may result from interruptions in our service as a result of systems failures and similar events.

Changes to payment card networks or bank fees, rules, or practices could harm our business.

We do not directly access the payment card networks, such as Visa and MasterCard, that enable our acceptance of credit cards and debit cards (including some types of prepaid cards). As a result, we must rely on banks or other payment processors to process transactions, and must pay fees for the services. From time to time, payment card networks have increased, and may increase in the future, the interchange fees and assessments that they charge for each transaction which accesses their networks. Our payment card processors have the right to pass any increases in interchange fees and assessments on to us as well as increase their own fees for processing. Any changes in interchange fees and assessments could increase our operating costs and reduce our operating income.

In addition, in some jurisdictions, governments have required Visa and MasterCard to reduce interchange fees, or have opened investigations as to whether Visa’s or MasterCard’s interchange fees and practices violate antitrust law. In the United States, the Federal Reserve Board issued a final rule capping debit card interchange fees at significantly lower rates than Visa or MasterCard previously charged. In the European Union, the Multilateral Interchange Fee (“MIF”) Regulation limits credit and debit interchange fees for payments to 0.3% and 0.2%, respectively. The MIF Regulation, which is expected to become effective in the second half of 2015, may significantly impact our pricing policy in the European Union. Any such material reduction in credit or debit card interchange rates in the United States or other markets could jeopardize our competitive position against traditional credit and debit card processors, although it would also lower our costs. Future changes to those regulations or to our business could potentially cause us to be treated as a payment card network, which could subject us to additional regulation and require us to change our business practices, which could reduce our revenue and adversely affect our business.

We are required by our processors to comply with payment card network operating rules, including special operating rules for payment service providers to merchants, and we have agreed to reimburse our processors for

any fines they are assessed by payment card networks as a result of any rule violations by us or our merchants. The payment card networks set and interpret the card operating rules. Payment card networks have from time to time alleged that various aspects of our business model violate these operating rules. If such allegations are not resolved, they could result in material fines and penalties or require changes in our business that may be costly. The payment card networks could adopt new operating rules or interpret or re-interpret existing rules that we or our processors might find difficult or even impossible to follow, or costly to implement. As a result, we could lose our ability to give consumers the option of using payment cards to fund their payments or the choice of currency in which they would like their card to be charged. If we were unable to accept payment cards or were meaningfully limited in our ability to do so, our business would be harmed.

We and our payment card processors have implemented specific business processes for merchants in order to comply with operating rules for providing services to merchants, but any failure to comply could result in fines. We also could be, and in the past have been, subject to fines from payment card networks if we fail to detect that merchants are engaging in activities that are illegal or that are considered “high risk,” primarily the sale of certain types of digital content. For “high risk” merchants, we must either prevent such merchants from using our PayPal services or register such merchants with the payment card networks and conduct additional monitoring with respect to such merchants. Although the amount of these fines has not been material to date, any additional fines in the future could become material and could result in a termination of our ability to accept payment cards or require changes in our process for registering new customers. This would significantly damage our business. Our retail point-of-sale solution and PayPal Here product are also subject to payment card network operating rules, which may increase the costs of those products or otherwise negatively impact their deployment.

We incur substantial losses due to claims from consumers that merchants have not performed or that their goods or services do not match the merchant’s description. We seek to recover such losses from the merchant, but may not be able to recover in full if the merchant is unwilling or unable to pay. We also incur losses from claims that the consumer did not authorize the purchase, from consumer fraud, from erroneous transmissions and from customers who have closed bank accounts or have insufficient funds in them to satisfy payments. In addition, if losses incurred by us related to payment card transactions become excessive, they could potentially result in our losing the right to accept payment cards for payment. In the event that we were unable to accept payment cards, the number of transactions processed through our PayPal services would decrease substantially and our business could be harmed. We are similarly subject to the risk of fraudulent activity associated with merchants, consumers of PayPal Credit products and third parties handling our user information. We have taken measures to detect and reduce the risk of fraud, but these measures need to be continually improved and may not be effective against new and continually evolving forms of fraud or in connection with new product offerings. If these measures do not succeed, our business could be harmed.

Any factors that reduce cross-border trade or make such trade more difficult could harm our business.

Cross-border trade is an important source of both revenue and profits for us. For the year ended December 31, 2014, approximately 24% of total payment volume (“TPV”) involved cross-border trade (i.e., transactions where the merchant and consumer were in different countries). Cross-border transactions generally provide higher revenues and operating income than similar transactions that take place within a single country or market. Cross-border trade also represents our primary (or in some cases, only) presence in certain important markets, such as China.

Cross-border trade is subject to, and may be impacted by, foreign exchange rate fluctuations. In addition, the potential interpretation and application of laws of multiple jurisdictions (e.g., the jurisdiction of the merchant and the consumer) are often extremely complicated in the context of cross-border trade. The interpretation and/or

application of such laws could impose restrictions on cross-border trade. Any factors that increase the costs of cross-border trade or restrict, delay, or make cross-border trade more difficult or impractical would lower our revenues and profits and could harm our business.

Our business is subject to extensive government regulation and oversight relating to the provision of financial services.

We are subject to various laws and regulations in the United States and other countries where we operate. Such laws and regulations include those governing banking, deposit taking, cross-border and domestic money transmission, foreign exchange, and payment services, such as payment processing and settlement services. The legal and regulatory requirements that apply to us vary in the markets where we operate and have increased over time as the geographical scope and complexity of our business and products have expanded. While we have a compliance program focused on compliance with applicable laws and regulations and have increased the resources allocated to that program in the last several years, we may still be subject to fines or other enforcement actions in one or more jurisdictions or be required to make changes to our business practices or compliance programs in the future. Non-compliance could also result in significant criminal and civil lawsuits, penalties, forfeiture of significant assets, or other enforcement actions. Costs associated with fines, enforcement actions, as well as reputational harm, changes in compliance requirements or limits on our ability to expand our product offerings could harm our business.

PayPal has obtained licenses to operate as a money transmitter (or its equivalent) in the United States, in the states where it is required, and the District of Columbia, the U.S. Virgin Islands and Puerto Rico. Our subsidiary, Venmo, is also licensed as a money transmitter in certain U.S. states. As licensed money transmitters, PayPal and Venmo are subject to restrictions with respect to their investment of customer funds, reporting requirements, bonding requirements and inspection by state regulatory agencies. Accordingly, we could be subject to liability and/or additional restrictions, forced to cease doing business with residents of certain states, forced to change our business practices or be required to obtain additional licenses or regulatory approvals that could impose substantial cost if we violate these laws or regulations.

While we currently allow our consumers with credit cards to send payments from approximately 200 markets, we allow customers in only approximately half of those markets (including the United States) to also receive payments, in some cases with significant restrictions on the manner in which customers can withdraw funds. These limitations may affect our ability to grow in these markets. Of the markets whose residents can use our PayPal services, approximately 30 markets are in member states of the European Union. We provide localized versions of our service to customers in the European Union through PayPal (Europe) S.à r.l. et Cie, SCA (“PayPal (Europe)”), our wholly-owned subsidiary that is licensed and subject to regulation as a bank in Luxembourg. Accordingly, PayPal (Europe) is subject to significant fines or other enforcement action if it violates the disclosure, reporting, anti-money-laundering, capitalization, funds management, corporate governance, privacy, information security, bank secrecy, taxation, sanctions, or other requirements imposed on Luxembourg banks. Any fines or other enforcement actions could adversely affect our business. In addition, European Union laws and regulations are typically subject to different and potentially inconsistent interpretations by the countries that are members of the European Union, which can make compliance more costly and operationally difficult to manage.

In many markets, such as China, much of Southeast Asia and South America, we serve our customers through PayPal Pte. Ltd., our wholly-owned subsidiary that is based in Singapore. PayPal Pte. Ltd. is supervised by the Monetary Authority of Singapore as a holder of a stored value facility and does not hold a remittance license. As a result, PayPal Pte. Ltd. is not able to offer remittance payments (including donations to charities) in Singapore, and can only offer payments for the purchase of goods and services. In many of the markets (other than Singapore) served by PayPal Pte. Ltd., it is not clear whether our Singapore-based service is subject only to Singapore law or, if it is subject to local laws, whether such local laws would require a payment processor like us to be licensed as a bank or financial institution or otherwise.

In Australia, we serve our customers through PayPal Australia Pty. Ltd., which is licensed by the Australian Securities and Investments Commission as a financial product and by the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority as a purchased payment facility provider, which is a type of authorized depository institution. Accordingly, PayPal Australia would be subject to significant fines or other enforcement action if it violates the disclosure, reporting, anti-money laundering, capitalization, privacy, corporate governance or other requirements imposed on Australian depository institutions.

We are also subject to regulation in other markets in which we do business and we have been and expect to continue to be required to apply for various licenses, certifications and regulatory approvals in a number of the countries where we have operations, such as Canada, Turkey, China, Mexico, Brazil and Hong Kong. There can be no assurance that PayPal will be able to obtain any such licenses. Even if PayPal were able to obtain such licenses, there are substantial costs and potential product changes involved in maintaining such licenses, and PayPal would be subject to fines or other enforcement action if it violates disclosure, reporting, anti-money laundering, capitalization, corporate governance or other requirements of such licenses. These factors could impose substantial additional costs and involve considerable delay to the development or provision of PayPal’s products in certain countries.

In many other countries it may not be clear whether we are required to be licensed as a bank, financial institution or otherwise. In such markets, we may rely on partnerships with local banks to process payments and conduct foreign exchange in local currency. Local regulators may use their power to slow or halt payments to local merchants conducted through our local banking partner. Such regulatory actions or the need to obtain licenses, certifications or other regulatory approvals could impose substantial costs and involve considerable delay to the provision or development of our PayPal services in a given market, or could require significant and costly operational changes or prevent us from providing any services in a given market.

We are subject to consumer protection laws and regulations in the United States and the other countries in which we operate. We are focused on compliance with these laws and regulations and have programs designed to comply with new and existing consumer protection requirements. However, any errors, failures, or delays in complying with such consumer protection laws and regulations could result in significant criminal and civil lawsuits, penalties, forfeiture of significant assets, or other enforcement actions, as well as reputational harm. Any new consumer protection laws and regulations (or changes to, or expansion of, the interpretation or application of existing laws and regulations) applicable to us could subject us to additional restrictions on our operations, additional compliance and licensure requirements, and increased regulatory scrutiny, which could force us to change our business practices or limit our ability to grow our business. Costs associated with fines or enforcement actions, changes in compliance requirements, or limitations on our ability to grow our business, could have an adverse effect on our financial results and harm our business.

Although there have been no definitive interpretations to date, we have taken actions as though our services are subject to the Electronic Fund Transfer Act and Regulation E issued by the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (“CFPB”). Under such regulations, among other things, we are required to provide advance disclosure of changes to our services, to follow specified error resolution procedures and to reimburse consumers for losses from certain transactions not authorized by the consumer. Additionally, even technical violations of these laws can result in penalties of up to $1,000 for each non-compliant transaction or up to $500,000 per violation in any class action, and we could also be liable for plaintiffs’ attorneys’ fees. In the second quarter of 2010, two putative class-action lawsuits (Devinda Fernando and Vadim Tsigel v. PayPal, Inc. and Moises Zepeda v. PayPal, Inc.) were filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. These lawsuits contain allegations related to violations of aspects of the Electronic Fund Transfer Act and Regulation E and violations of a previous settlement agreement related to Regulation E, and/or allege that we improperly held consumer funds or otherwise improperly limited consumer accounts. These lawsuits seek damages as well as changes to our business practices, among other remedies. A determination that there have been violations of the Electronic Fund Transfer

Act, Regulation E or violations of other laws relating to our business practices could expose us to significant liability. Any changes to our business practices resulting from these lawsuits could require us to incur significant costs and to expend substantial resources, which could delay other planned product launches or improvements and further harm our business.

The financial services sector has been increasingly subject to regulatory scrutiny. In January 2012, the CFPB finalized rules under Regulation E, mandated by the Dodd-Frank Act, which required us, beginning in October 2013, to provide additional disclosures, error resolution rights, and cancellation rights to U.S. consumers who make international remittance payments. In November 2014, the CFPB proposed a new prepaid account rule that would apply to prepaid cards and mobile wallets, including PayPal accounts. In December 2014, we became subject to CFPB supervision and examination pursuant to a new regulation that allows the CFPB to supervise all companies, including PayPal, that provide more than one million international money transfers per year. Under the regulation, CFPB examiners are now able to examine us for compliance with the remittance transfer rule and other laws and regulations. For other matters relating to regulation by the CFPB, please see the section of this information statement entitled “Business—Legal and Regulatory Proceedings.”

PayPal (Europe) implements its localized services in European Union countries through a “passport” notification process through the Luxembourg regulator to regulators in other European Union member states pursuant to European Union Directives, and has completed the “passport” notification process in all European Union member countries other than Croatia. The regulators in these countries could notify PayPal (Europe) of local consumer protection laws that apply to its business, in addition to Luxembourg consumer protection law, and could also seek to persuade the Luxembourg regulator to order PayPal (Europe) to conduct its activities in the local country through a branch office. These or similar actions by these regulators could increase the cost of, or delay, our plans for expanding our business in European Union countries. In addition, the countries that are members of the European Union may each have different and potentially inconsistent interpretations of regulations implementing the European Union Payment Services Directive, which could make compliance more costly and operationally difficult to manage. The European Commission has proposed revisions to the Payments Services and Anti-Money Laundering Directives, which could further make compliance more costly and operationally difficult to manage. Finally, if the assets of PayPal (Europe) exceed certain thresholds, or if the European Central Bank determines that PayPal is a significant supervised entity, PayPal (Europe) could become directly regulated by the European Central Bank rather than primarily by Luxembourg as a less significant supervised entity, which would likely increase its costs.

We are subject to anti-money laundering and counter-terrorist financing laws and regulations.

We are subject to various anti-money laundering and counter-terrorist financing laws and regulations around the world that prohibit, among other things, our involvement in transferring the proceeds of criminal activities. We have programs designed to comply with new and existing legal and regulatory requirements. However, any errors, failures, or delays in complying with federal, state or foreign anti-money laundering or counter-terrorist financing laws and regulations could result in significant criminal and civil lawsuits, penalties, forfeiture of significant assets, or other enforcement actions, as well as reputational harm. For a discussion of our dealings with the U.S. Department of Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (“OFAC”), please see the section of this information statement entitled “Business—Legal and Regulatory Proceedings.”

U.S. regulators have increased their scrutiny of compliance with these obligations, which may require us to further revise or expand our compliance program, including the procedures we use to verify the identity of our customers and to monitor international and domestic transactions. Several countries in which we are regulated have also implemented new anti-money laundering and counter-terrorist financing laws and regulations, and we have had to make changes to our compliance program in response. Regulators regularly re-examine the transaction volume thresholds at which we must obtain and keep applicable records or verify identities of customers and any change in such thresholds could result in greater costs for compliance. Costs associated with fines or enforcement actions, changes in compliance requirements, or limitations on our ability to grow our

business could harm our business and any new requirements or changes to existing requirements could impose significant costs, result in delays to planned product improvements, make it more difficult for new customers to join our network and reduce the attractiveness of our products and services.

Regulation in the areas of privacy and protection of user data could harm our business.

We are subject to laws relating to the collection, use, retention, security, and transfer of personally identifiable information about our customers around the world. Much of the personal information that we collect, especially financial information, is regulated by multiple laws. User data protection laws may be interpreted and applied inconsistently from country to country. In many cases, these laws apply not only to third-party transactions, but also to transfers of information between or among ourselves, our subsidiaries, and other parties with which we have commercial relations. These laws continue to develop in ways we cannot predict and that may harm our business.

Regulatory scrutiny of privacy, user data protection, use of data and data collection is increasing on a global basis. We are subject to a number of privacy and similar laws and regulations in the countries in which we operate and these laws and regulations will likely continue to evolve over time, both through regulatory and legislative action and judicial decisions. Some of these laws impose requirements that are inconsistent with one another, yet regulators may claim that both apply. Complying with these varying national requirements could cause us to incur substantial costs or require us to change our business practices in a manner adverse to our business and violations of privacy-related laws can result in significant penalties. In addition, compliance with these laws may restrict our ability to provide services to our customers that they may find to be valuable. A determination that there have been violations of laws relating to our practices under communications-based laws could expose us to significant damage awards, fines and other penalties that could, individually or in the aggregate, materially harm our business. In particular, because of the enormous number of texts, emails and other communications we send to our customers, communications laws that provide a specified monetary damage award or fine for each violation (such as those described below) could result in particularly large awards or fines.

For example, the Federal Communications Commission amended certain of its regulations under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act, or TCPA, in 2012 and 2013 in a manner that could increase our exposure to liability for certain types of telephonic communication with customers, including but not limited to text messages to mobile phones. Under the TCPA, plaintiffs may seek actual monetary loss or statutory damages of $500 per violation, whichever is greater, and courts may treble the damage award for willful or knowing violations. We are regularly subject to class-action lawsuits, as well as individual lawsuits, containing allegations that our business violated the TCPA. We recently settled Murray v. Bill Me Later (filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois in June 2012), which alleged that Bill Me Later made calls featuring artificial or prerecorded voices without prior consent. These lawsuits, and other private lawsuits not currently alleged as class actions, seek damages (including statutory damages) and injunctive relief, among other remedies. Given the enormous number of communications we send to our customers, a determination that there have been violations of the TCPA or other communications-based statutes could expose us to significant damage awards that could, individually or in the aggregate, materially harm our business. We have also received inquiries from regulators regarding future revisions to our user agreement. See “Business—Legal and Regulatory Proceedings—Regulatory Proceedings.”

We post on our websites our privacy policies and practices concerning the collection, use and disclosure of user data. Any failure, or perceived failure, by us to comply with our posted privacy policies or with any regulatory requirements or orders or other federal, state or international privacy or consumer protection-related laws and regulations could result in proceedings or actions against us by governmental entities or others (e.g., class action privacy litigation), subject us to significant penalties and negative publicity, require us to change our business practices, increase our costs and adversely affect our business. Data collection, privacy and security have become the subject of increasing public concern. If Internet and mobile customers were to reduce their use of our websites, mobile platforms, products, and services as a result of these concerns, our business could be harmed. As noted above, we are also subject to the possibility of security breaches, which themselves may result in a violation of these laws.

PayPal is not a bank or licensed lender in the United States and relies upon third parties to make loans and provide the other products critical to our business.

As PayPal is neither a chartered financial institution nor licensed to make loans in any state, we must rely on a bank or licensed lender to offer the PayPal Credit products in the United States. Currently, when a U.S. consumer makes a purchase using a PayPal Credit product, a chartered financial institution extends credit to the consumer, funds the extension of credit at the point of sale, and advances funds to the merchant. We subsequently purchase and retain most of the receivables related to the consumer loans made by the chartered financial institution and, as a result, bear most of the risk of loss in the event of loan defaults. Although the chartered financial institution continues to own each of the consumer accounts, we own most of the related consumer loan receivables, and we are also responsible for servicing functions related to the consumer account.

Comenity Capital Bank and WebBank, which are both industrial banks chartered by the State of Utah, currently issue PayPal Credit products in the United States, with Comenity Capital Bank originating the majority of new loans. As part of this arrangement, WebBank has agreed to take ownership of (and originate loans with respect to) all consumer accounts in the event of a termination or interruption in Comenity Capital Bank’s ability to lend. Nevertheless, any termination or interruption of WebBank’s or Comenity Capital Bank’s ability to lend could result in the inability to originate any new PayPal Credit products, which would require us either to reach a similar arrangement with another chartered financial institution, which, if possible at all, may not be available on favorable terms, or to obtain our own bank charter, which would be a time-consuming and costly process and would subject us to a number of additional laws and regulations, compliance with which would be burdensome.

The PayPal Credit products also rely on third-party merchant processors and payment gateways to process transactions. For the year ended December 31, 2014, approximately 16% of all transaction volume by dollar amount through the PayPal Credit products was settled through the facilities of a single vendor. Any disruption to these third-party payment processing and gateway services would adversely affect the PayPal Credit products.

Our PayPal Credit products are offered to a wide range of consumers, and the financial success of these products depends on our ability and the ability of the banks issuing the PayPal Credit products to manage the credit risk related to these products. The lenders extend credit at the point of sale using our proprietary segmentation and credit scoring algorithms and other analytical techniques designed to analyze the credit risk of specific consumers based on their past purchasing and payment history as well as their credit scores. These algorithms and techniques may not accurately predict the creditworthiness of a consumer due to inaccurate assumptions about a particular consumer or the economic environment, among other factors. The accuracy of the predictions and the ability of the lenders and our ability to manage credit risk related to the PayPal Credit products may also be affected by legal or regulatory changes (e.g., bankruptcy laws and minimum payment regulations), competitors’ actions, changes in consumer behavior, and other factors. A lender may incorrectly interpret the data produced by these algorithms in setting its credit policies, which may impact the financial performance of the PayPal Credit products. In addition, economic and financial conditions may affect consumer confidence levels and reduce consumers’ ability or willingness to use credit, including the credit extended by a lender to PayPal Credit account holders who use the PayPal Credit products, which could harm our business. As of December 31, 2014, approximately $20.2 billion of unused credit was available to PayPal Credit account holders. While this amount represents the total unused credit available, we have not experienced, and do not anticipate, that all of our PayPal Credit account holders will access their entire available credit at any given point in time. In addition, the individual lines of credit that make up this unused credit are subject to periodic review and termination by the chartered financial institutions that are the issuers of PayPal Credit products based on, among other things, account usage and consumer creditworthiness.

Over the past several years, the volume of credit extended by the financial institutions issuing the PayPal Credit products has increased. In the United States, we purchase the receivables relating to these consumer loans

extended by the issuing banks, and therefore bear the risk of loss in the event of loan defaults. Like other businesses with significant exposure to losses from consumer credit, we face the risk that PayPal Credit account holders will default on their payment obligations, making the receivables uncollectible and creating the risk of potential charge-offs. The rate at which receivables were charged off as uncollectible, or the net charge-off rate, was approximately 5.67% for the year ended December 31, 2014. The non-payment rate among PayPal Credit account holders may increase due to, among other things, changes to underwriting standards by us and the financial institutions issuing the PayPal Credit products, worsening economic conditions, such as a recession or greater austerity in various countries, and high unemployment rates. Consumers who miss payments often fail to repay their loans, and consumers who file for protection under the bankruptcy laws generally do not repay their loans.

We have entered into an agreement with Synchrony (formerly GE Capital Retail Bank) pursuant to which we, one of our affiliates, or a third party partner of ours, will purchase, subject to certain conditions, a dual-branded retail credit card portfolio from Synchrony. We will ultimately own the related consumer loan receivables. This transaction is currently expected to close in the fourth quarter of 2016, although there can be no assurance that this transaction will close on terms currently contemplated, or at all. If this transaction is consummated, it will increase the risks relating to our ownership of consumer loan receivables.

In 2013, we began a program, working with WebBank, for WebBank to offer working capital financing to selected merchants in the United States, and for us to purchase the related receivables. Similar programs are also available in the United Kingdom and Australia. Loans to merchants present risks similar to those discussed above associated with the PayPal Credit products.

We purchase receivables related to PayPal Credit products and other credit accounts. If we are unable to fund our purchase of these receivables adequately or in a cost-effective manner, or if we are unable to efficiently manage the cash resources utilized to purchase these receivables, our business could be harmed.

We are subject to laws and regulations affecting our domestic and international operations in a number of other areas, including data privacy requirements, intellectual property ownership and infringement, tax, anti-competition, export requirements, anti-corruption, labor, advertising, billing, promotions, quality of services, environmental, and health and safety regulations. It is not always clear how these laws and regulations apply to our business. Many of these laws and regulations were adopted prior to the advent of the Internet, mobile, and related technologies and, as a result, do not contemplate or address the unique issues of the Internet, mobile and related technologies. Many of these laws, including some of those that do reference the Internet, mobile and related technologies are subject to interpretation by the courts on an ongoing basis and, as a result, their applicability and scope remain uncertain.

Compliance with these laws, regulations, and similar requirements may be onerous and expensive, and variances and inconsistencies from jurisdiction to jurisdiction may further increase the cost of compliance and doing business. For example, new or proposed laws in certain countries require us to maintain separate servers in those countries so that all personal data of citizens of that country are maintained locally. Any such costs, which may rise in the future as a result of changes in these laws and regulations or in their interpretation, could individually or in the aggregate make our products and services less attractive to our customers, delay the introduction of new products or services in one or more regions, or cause us to change or limit our business practices. We have implemented policies and procedures designed to ensure compliance with applicable laws and regulations, but there can be no assurance that our employees, contractors, or agents will not violate such laws and regulations or our policies and procedures.

Financial and political events have increased the level of regulatory scrutiny on large companies, and regulatory agencies may view matters or interpret laws and regulations differently than they have in the past and

in a manner adverse to our business. Our success and increased visibility have driven existing businesses that perceive us to be a threat to their businesses to raise concerns about our business models to policymakers and regulators. These businesses and their trade association groups employ significant resources in their efforts to shape the legal and regulatory regimes in countries where we have significant operations. They may employ these resources in an effort to change the legal and regulatory regimes in ways intended to reduce the effectiveness of our business and the ability of customers to use our products and services.

As we expand and localize our international activities, we are increasingly becoming obligated to comply with the laws of the countries or markets in which we operate. In addition, because our services are accessible worldwide and we facilitate sales of goods and provide services to customers worldwide, one or more jurisdictions may claim that we or our customers are required to comply with their laws. Laws regulating Internet, mobile and related technologies outside of the United States are generally less favorable to us than those in the United States. Compliance may be more costly or may require us to change our business practices or restrict our services, and the imposition of any regulations on us or our customers could harm our business. In addition, we may be subject to multiple overlapping legal or regulatory regimes that impose conflicting requirements on us (e.g., in cross-border trade). Our alleged failure to comply with foreign laws could subject us to penalties ranging from criminal prosecution to significant fines to bans on our services, in addition to the significant costs we may incur in defending against such actions.

Following the global financial crisis of 2008, U.S. federal lawmakers enacted the Dodd-Frank Act overhauling the federal government’s oversight of consumer financial products and systemic risk in the U.S. financial system. The general effect of the financial reform law has been, and we expect will continue to be, to require us to make additional disclosures to our consumers and to impose new restrictions and requirements on certain of our activities, resulting in new compliance requirements and obligations that could increase our costs, may result in increased litigation and the need to make expensive product changes, and could otherwise harm our business.

Substantial and increasingly intense competition worldwide in the global payments industry may harm our business.

The global payments industry is highly competitive. We compete against businesses in varied industries, many of whom are larger than we are, have a dominant and secure position in other industries, and offer other goods and services to consumers and merchants which we do not offer. As online and offline commerce increasingly converge, the pace of change, innovation and disruption is increasing. The global payments industry is rapidly changing, highly innovative and increasingly subject to regulatory scrutiny, which may negatively affect the competitive landscape. We compete against all forms of payments, including:

Some of these payment providers have greater customer bases, volume, scale, and market share than we do, which may provide significant competitive advantages. Some of these competitors may also be subject to less burdensome licensing, anti-money laundering, counter-terrorist financing, and other regulatory requirements. They may devote greater resources to the development, promotion, and sale of products and services, and they may offer lower prices or more effectively introduce their own innovative programs and services that adversely impact our growth. We also expect new entrants to offer competitive products and services. In addition, some merchants provide such services to themselves. Competing services tied to established banks and other financial institutions may offer greater liquidity and engender greater consumer confidence in the safety and efficacy of their services. In addition, in certain countries, such as Germany, Netherlands and Australia, electronic funds transfer is a leading method of payment for both online and offline transactions. As in the United States, established banks and other financial institutions that do not currently offer online payments could quickly and easily develop such a service.

If we are not able to differentiate our business from those of our competitors, drive value for our customers, and/or effectively align our resources with our goals and objectives, we may not be able to compete effectively against our competitors. Our failure to compete effectively against any of the foregoing competitive threats could materially and adversely harm our business.

We have significant operations internationally that are denominated in foreign currencies, primarily the Euro, British Pound, and Australian Dollar, subjecting us to foreign currency risk. The strengthening or weakening of the U.S. dollar versus the Euro, British Pound, and Australian Dollar impacts the translation of our net revenues generated in these foreign currencies into the U.S. dollar. In 2014, foreign currency movements relative to the U.S. dollar negatively impacted net revenues by approximately $25 million (inclusive of a $36 million negative impact from hedging activities). In 2013, foreign currency movements relative to the U.S. dollar negatively impacted net revenues by approximately $8 million (inclusive of a $4 million negative impact from hedging activities). Additionally, in connection with our services in multiple currencies, we set our foreign exchange rates twice per day, and may face financial exposure if we incorrectly set our foreign exchange rates or as a result of fluctuations in foreign exchange rates between the times that we set our foreign exchange rates. Given that we also hold some corporate and customer funds in non-U.S. currencies, our financial results are affected by the translation of these non-U.S. currencies into U.S. dollars. While we regularly enter into transactions to hedge portions of our foreign currency translation exposure, it is impossible to predict or eliminate the effects of this exposure. Fluctuations in foreign exchange rates could significantly impact our financial results.

We are exposed to interest rate risk from our investment portfolio and from interest-rate sensitive assets underlying the customer balances we hold on our combined balance sheet as customer accounts. As of December 31, 2014, approximately 97% of our total cash and investment portfolio was held in cash and cash equivalents. The assets underlying our customer balances we hold on our combined balance sheet as customer accounts are maintained in interest and non-interest bearing bank deposits, time deposits, and U.S. and foreign government and agency securities. We seek to preserve principal while holding eligible liquid assets, as defined by the regulatory requirements and commercial law in the jurisdictions in which we operate, equal to at least 100% of the aggregate amount of all customer balances. We do not pay interest on amounts due to customers. A 100 basis point adverse change in interest rates would not have a material impact on the Company’s financial assets or liabilities at December 31, 2014 and 2013.

Also, fluctuations in interest rates may adversely impact our customers’ spending levels and ability and willingness to pay outstanding amounts owed to us. Higher interest rates often lead to higher payment obligations by customers to us and other lenders under mortgage, credit card and other consumer loans, which may reduce our customers’ ability to remain current on their obligations to us and therefore lead to increased delinquencies, charge-offs and allowance for loan and interest receivable which could have an adverse effect on our net earnings.

In addition, we may enter into a new revolving credit facility that could bear interest at a floating rate. As a result, we will be exposed to fluctuations in interest rates to the extent of our borrowings under the revolving credit facility.

Changes to our buyer and seller protection programs could increase our loss rate.

Our buyer and seller protection programs protect merchants and consumers from fraudulent transactions. In addition, consumers who pay through PayPal may have reimbursement rights from their payment card company or bank, which in turn will seek recovery from us. The risk of losses from our buyer and seller protection programs are specific to individual buyers, sellers and transactions, and may also be impacted by regional variations to these programs and modifications to these programs resulting from changes in regulatory requirements or changes that we decide to implement. Following the distribution, we will extend our protection programs to certain customers’ purchases on eBay, and our costs will therefore increase. See footnote (b) to “Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined Financial Statements.” For the periods presented in the combined financial statements, payments under these programs have ranged between 0.08% and 0.12% of TPV on an annual basis. Historical trends may not be an indication of future payments under these programs. Increases in our loss rate resulting from changes to our buyer and seller protection programs could harm our business.

Our international operations are subject to increased risks, which could harm our business.

Our international operations, especially in the United Kingdom, Germany (and the other countries of the European Union) and China, have generated a majority of our net revenues in recent years. In addition to uncertainty about our ability to generate revenues from our foreign operations and expand into international markets, there are risks inherent in doing business internationally, including:

Violations of the complex foreign and U.S. laws and regulations that apply to our international operations may result in fines, criminal actions, or sanctions against us, our officers, or our employees; prohibitions on the

conduct of our business; and damage to our reputation. Although we have implemented policies and procedures designed to promote compliance with these laws, there can be no assurance that our employees, contractors, or agents will not violate our policies. These risks are inherent in our international operations and expansion and may increase our costs of doing business internationally and could harm our business.

Our payment system is susceptible to potentially illegal or improper uses, including terrorist financing, illegal online gambling, fraudulent sales of goods or services, illicit sales of prescription medications or controlled substances, piracy of software, movies, music, and other copyrighted or trademarked goods, money laundering, bank fraud, child pornography trafficking, prohibited sales of alcoholic beverages or tobacco products, online securities fraud. There has been an increased focus by intellectual property rights owners and government officials on the role that payments systems play in the sale of, and payment for, pirated digital goods on the Internet, primarily through file sharing services. Changes in law have increased the penalties for intermediaries providing payment services for certain illegal activities and additional payments-related proposals are under active consideration by government authorities. Intellectual property rights owners may seek to bring legal action against providers of payments solutions, such as PayPal, and other entities that are peripherally involved in the sale of infringing items. Rights owners have also increasingly gone into U.S. courts and obtained injunctions requiring us to cease handling transactions for named websites and third parties (in most cases located outside the United States) and to hold the funds of such parties pending judicial resolution of the rights owners’ claims, which disrupts the relationship between such parties and us.

Any resulting claims could damage our reputation and any resulting liabilities, loss of transaction volume or increased costs could harm our business.

We are subject to risks associated with information disseminated through our services.

Online services companies may be subject to claims relating to information disseminated through their services, including claims alleging defamation, libel, breach of contract, invasion of privacy, negligence, copyright or trademark infringement, among other things. The laws relating to the liability of online services companies for information disseminated through their services are subject to frequent challenges both in the United States and foreign jurisdictions. Any liabilities incurred as a result of these matters could require us to incur additional costs and harm our reputation and our business.

Our potential liability to third parties for the customer-provided content on our sites, particularly in jurisdictions outside the United States where laws governing Internet transactions are unsettled, may increase. If we become liable for information provided by our customers and carried on our service in any jurisdiction in which we operate, we could be directly harmed and we may be forced to implement new measures to reduce our exposure to this liability, including expending substantial resources or discontinuing certain service offerings, which could harm our business.

Our failure to manage the assets underlying our customer funds properly could harm our business.

Our ability to manage and account accurately for the assets underlying our customer funds requires a high level of internal controls. As our business continues to grow and we expand our product offerings, we must continue to strengthen our internal controls accordingly. Our success requires significant public confidence in our ability to handle large and growing transaction volumes and amounts of customer funds. Any failure to maintain the necessary controls or to manage the assets underlying our customer funds accurately could severely diminish customer use of our products and/or result in penalties and fines, which could harm our business.

We are subject to regulatory activity and antitrust litigation under competition laws.

We are subject to scrutiny by various government agencies under U.S. and foreign laws and regulations, including competition laws. Some jurisdictions also provide private rights of action for competitors or consumers to assert claims of anti-competitive conduct. Other companies and government agencies have in the past and may in the future allege that our actions violate the antitrust or competition laws of the United States, individual states, the European Commission or other countries, or otherwise constitute unfair competition. An increasing number of governments are regulating competition law activities, including increased scrutiny in large markets such as China. Our business partnerships or agreements or arrangements with customers or other companies could give rise to regulatory action or antitrust litigation. Some regulators, particularly those outside of the United States, may perceive our business to be used so broadly that otherwise uncontroversial business practices could be deemed anticompetitive. Any claims or investigations, even if without foundation, may be very expensive to defend or respond to, involve negative publicity and substantial diversion of management time and effort and could result in significant judgments against us or require us to change our business practices.

We have repeatedly been sued for allegedly infringing other parties’ patents. We are a defendant in a number of patent lawsuits and have been notified of several other potential patent disputes. We expect that we will increasingly be subject to patent infringement claims because, among other reasons:

Such claims may be brought directly against us and/or against our customers whom we may indemnify either because we are contractually obligated to do so or we choose to do so as a business matter. We believe that an increasing number of these claims against us and other technology companies have been, and continue to be, initiated by third parties whose sole or primary business is to assert such claims. In addition, we have seen significant patent disputes between operating companies in some technology industries. Patent claims, whether meritorious or not, are time-consuming and costly to defend and resolve, and could require us to make expensive changes in our methods of doing business, enter into costly royalty or licensing agreements, make substantial payments to satisfy adverse judgments or settle claims or proceedings, or cease conducting certain operations, which would harm our business.

We may be unable to adequately protect or enforce our intellectual property rights, or third parties may allege that we are infringing their intellectual property rights.

We believe the protection of our intellectual property, including our trademarks, patents, copyrights, domain names, trade dress, and trade secrets, is critical to our success. We seek to protect our intellectual property rights by relying on applicable laws and regulations in the United States and internationally, as well as a variety of administrative procedures. We also rely on contractual restrictions to protect our proprietary rights when offering or procuring products and services, including confidentiality and invention assignment agreements entered into with our employees and contractors and confidentiality agreements with parties with whom we conduct business.

However, effective intellectual property protection may not be available in every country in which our products and services are made available, and contractual arrangements and other steps we have taken to protect our intellectual property may not prevent third parties from infringing or misappropriating our intellectual property or deter independent development of equivalent or superior intellectual property rights by others. Trademark, copyright, patent, domain name, trade dress and trade secret protection is very expensive to maintain

and may require litigation. We must protect our intellectual property rights and other proprietary rights in an increasing number of jurisdictions, a process that is expensive and time consuming and may not be successful in every jurisdiction. Also, we may not be able to discover or determine the extent of any unauthorized use of our proprietary rights. We have licensed in the past, and expect to license in the future, certain of our proprietary rights, such as trademarks or copyrighted material, to others. These licensees may take actions that diminish the value of our proprietary rights or harm our reputation. Any failure to adequately protect or enforce our intellectual property rights, or significant costs incurred in doing so, could materially harm our business.

As the number of products in the software industry increases and the functionality of these products further overlap, and as we acquire technology through acquisitions or licenses, we may become increasingly subject to infringement claims, including patent, copyright, and trademark infringement claims. Litigation may be necessary to determine the validity and scope of the patent and other intellectual property rights of others. The ultimate outcome of any allegation is uncertain and, regardless of the outcome, any such claim, with or without merit, may be time-consuming, result in costly litigation, divert management’s time and attention from our business, require us to stop selling, delay shipping, or redesign our products, or require us to pay substantial amounts to satisfy judgments or settle claims or lawsuits or to pay substantial royalty or licensing fees, or to satisfy indemnification obligations that we have with some of our customers. Our failure to obtain necessary license or other rights, or litigation or claims arising out of intellectual property matters, may harm our business.

We are regularly subject to general litigation, regulatory disputes, and government inquiries.

We are regularly subject to claims, lawsuits (including class actions and individual lawsuits), government investigations, and other proceedings involving competition and antitrust, intellectual property, privacy, consumer protection, accessibility claims, securities, tax, labor and employment, commercial disputes, content generated by our customers, services and other matters. In particular, our business faces ongoing consumer protection and intellectual property litigation, as discussed above. The number and significance of these disputes and inquiries have increased as our company has grown larger, our business has expanded in scope and geographic reach, and our products and services have increased in complexity. In addition, some of the laws and regulations affecting Internet and mobile commerce and consumer credit are subject to ongoing interpretation by the courts and governmental authorities, and the resulting uncertainty in the scope and application of these laws and regulations increases the risk that we will be subject to private claims and governmental actions alleging violations of those laws and regulations.

The outcome and impact of such claims, lawsuits, government investigations, and proceedings cannot be predicted with certainty. Regardless of the outcome, such investigations and proceedings can have an adverse impact on us because of legal costs, diversion of management resources, and other factors. Determining reserves for our pending litigation is a complex, fact-intensive process that is subject to judgment calls. It is possible that a resolution of one or more such proceedings could require us to make substantial payments to satisfy judgments, fines or penalties or to settle claims or proceedings, any of which could materially adversely affect our business. These proceedings could also result in reputational harm, criminal sanctions, consent decrees, or orders preventing us from offering certain products, or services, or requiring a change in our business practices in costly ways, or requiring development of non-infringing or otherwise altered products or technologies. Any of these consequences could materially adversely affect our business.

The determination of our worldwide provision for income taxes and other tax liabilities requires estimation and significant judgment, and there are many transactions and calculations where the ultimate tax determination is uncertain. Like many other multinational corporations, we are subject to tax in multiple U.S. and foreign tax jurisdictions and have structured our operations to reduce our effective tax rate. Our determination of our tax liability is always subject to audit and review by applicable domestic and foreign tax authorities, and we are currently undergoing a number of investigations, audits and reviews by taxing authorities throughout the world,

including with respect to our tax structure. Any adverse outcome of any such audit or review could have a negative effect on our business and the ultimate tax outcome may differ from the amounts recorded in our financial statements and may materially affect our financial results in the period or periods for which such determination is made. While we have established reserves based on assumptions and estimates that we believe are reasonable to cover such eventualities, these reserves may prove to be insufficient.

In addition, our future income taxes could be adversely affected by earnings being lower than anticipated (or by the incurrence of losses) in jurisdictions that have lower statutory tax rates and higher than anticipated in jurisdictions that have higher statutory tax rates, by changes in the valuation of our deferred tax assets and liabilities, as a result of gains on our foreign exchange risk management program, or changes in tax laws, regulations, or accounting principles, as well as certain discrete items.

In light of continuing fiscal challenges in certain U.S. states and in many countries in Europe, various levels of government are increasingly focused on tax reform and other legislative action to increase tax revenue, including corporate income taxes. For example, the economic downturn reduced tax revenues for United States federal and state governments, and a number of proposals to increase taxes from corporate entities have been implemented or are being considered at various levels of government. These include a number of proposals to modify the U.S. federal income tax laws applicable to companies, like ours, operating in multiple U.S. and foreign jurisdictions which, if enacted, could materially increase our effective tax rate. A number of U.S. states have attempted to increase corporate tax revenues by taking an expansive view of corporate presence to attempt to impose corporate income taxes and other direct business taxes on companies that have no physical presence in their state, and taxing authorities in foreign jurisdictions may take similar actions. Many U.S. states are also altering their apportionment formulas to increase the amount of taxable income or loss attributable to their state from certain out-of-state businesses. Similarly, in Europe, and elsewhere in the world, there are various tax reform efforts underway designed to ensure that corporate entities are taxed on a larger percentage of their earnings. If more taxing authorities are successful in applying direct taxes to Internet companies that do not have a physical presence in their respective jurisdictions, this could increase our effective tax rate.

We and our merchants may be subject to sales reporting and record-keeping obligations.

One or more states or the federal government or foreign countries may seek to impose reporting or record-keeping obligations on companies that engage in or facilitate ecommerce. Such an obligation could be imposed by legislation intended to improve tax compliance (and legislation to such effect has been contemplated by several states and a number of foreign jurisdictions) or if one of our companies was ever deemed to be the legal agent of our merchants by a jurisdiction in which it operates. We are required to report to the Internal Revenue Service, (“IRS”), on customers subject to U.S. income tax who receive more than $20,000 in payments and more than 200 payments in a calendar year. As a result, we are required to request tax identification numbers from certain payees, track payments by tax identification number and, under certain conditions, withhold a portion of payments and forward such withholding to the IRS. We have modified our software to meet these requirements and expect increased operational costs and changes to our customer experience in connection with complying with these reporting obligations. The IRS regulations also require us to collect a certification of non-U.S. taxpayer status from certain international merchants. The Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act, which took effect at the start of 2013, is likely to require an increase in the number of non-U.S. customers from whom we must obtain a similar certification, and to increase the compliance burdens on us. Any failure by us to meet these new requirements could result in substantial monetary penalties and other sanctions and could harm our business.

Acquisitions, joint ventures, and strategic investments could result in operating difficulties and could harm our business.

We have acquired a significant number of businesses of varying size and scope, technologies, services, and products. We also expect to continue to evaluate and consider a wide array of potential strategic transactions as part of our overall business strategy, including business combinations, acquisitions, and dispositions of businesses, technologies, services, products, and other assets, as well as strategic investments and joint ventures.

At any given time we may be engaged in discussions or negotiations with respect to one or more of these types of transactions and any of these transactions could be material to our financial condition and results of operations. In addition, it may take us longer than expected to fully realize the anticipated benefits of these transactions, and those benefits may ultimately be smaller than anticipated or may not be realized at all, which could adversely affect our business and operating results. Any acquisitions or dispositions may also require us to issue additional equity securities, spend our cash, or incur debt (and increased interest expense), liabilities, and amortization expenses related to intangible assets or write-offs of goodwill, which could adversely affect our results of operations and dilute the economic and voting rights of our stockholders.

In addition, we may make certain investments, including through joint ventures, in which we have a minority equity interest and/or lack management and operational control. Under such circumstances, the controlling joint venture partner in a joint venture investment may have business interests, strategies or goals that are inconsistent with ours, and business decisions or other actions or omissions of the controlling investor, joint venture partner or joint venture company may result in harm to our reputation or adversely affect the value of our investment in the investment or joint venture.

Problems with or price increases by third parties who provide services to us or to our customers could harm our business.

A number of third parties provide services to us or to our customers. We are dependent on caching services that make our sites load faster, the processing companies and banks that link us to the payment card, and bank clearing networks to process transactions, among others. We are subject to, among other things, increases in interchange fees and assessments that payment card networks such as Visa and MasterCard charge for each transaction using one of their cards (which our payment card processors have the right to pass on to us), as well as changes in payment card network operating rules, including special operating rules for Internet payment services providers, such as PayPal. Similarly, we rely on unaffiliated lenders to make the consumer and other loans originated through the PayPal Credit products and also rely heavily on third parties to operate our services, including merchant processors and payment gateways to process transactions and third parties that provide loan receivable tracking and customer statements processing. Financial or regulatory issues, labor issues (e.g., strikes, lockouts, or work stoppages), or other problems that prevent these companies from providing services to us or our customers could harm our business.

Price increases by, or service terminations, disruptions or interruptions at, companies that provide services to us and our customers and clients could also make it more difficult for our merchants to complete transactions, thereby harming our business. Some third parties who provide services to us may have or gain market power and be able to increase their prices to us without competitive constraint.

We have outsourced certain functions to third-party providers, including some customer support and product development functions, which are critical to our operations. If our service providers do not perform satisfactorily, our operations could be disrupted, which could result in customer dissatisfaction and could harm our business.

There can be no assurance that third parties who provide services directly to us or our customers will continue to do so on acceptable terms, or at all. If any third parties were to stop providing services to us or our merchants on acceptable terms, including as a result of bankruptcy, we may be unable to procure alternatives from other third parties in a timely and efficient manner and on acceptable terms, or at all.

Our developer platforms, which are open to merchants and third-party developers, subject us to additional risks.

We provide third-party developers with access to application programming interfaces, software development kits and other tools designed to allow them to produce applications for use, with a particular focus on mobile applications. There can be no assurance that merchants or third-party developers will develop and maintain applications and services on our open platforms on a timely basis or at all, and a number of factors could cause such third-party developers to curtail or stop development for our platforms. In addition, our business is subject to many regulatory restrictions. It is possible that merchants and third-party developers who utilize our development platforms or tools could violate these regulatory restrictions and we may be held responsible for such violations, which could harm our business.

We have announced several retail point of sale solutions, which enable merchants to accept payments using a payments card reader attached to, or otherwise communicating with, a mobile device or to scan payment cards and codes using the mobile device’s embedded camera and which will enable consumers to use their mobile devices to pay hands-free. To the extent that we continue to expand our product and service offerings at the retail point of sale, we will face additional risks, including:

Unless we are able to successfully manage these risks, including driving adoption of, and significant volume through, our retail point of sale solutions over time, our business may be harmed.

Our success largely depends on key personnel. Because competition for our key employees is intense, we may not be able to attract, retain, and develop the highly skilled employees we need to support our business. The loss of senior management or other key personnel could harm our business.

Our future performance depends substantially on the continued services of our senior management and other key personnel, including key engineering and product development personnel, and our ability to attract, retain, and motivate key personnel. Competition for key personnel is intense, especially in the Silicon Valley where our corporate headquarters are located, and we may be unable to successfully attract, integrate, or retain sufficiently qualified key personnel. In making employment decisions, particularly in the Internet and high-technology industries, job candidates often consider the value of the equity awards they would receive in connection with their employment and fluctuations in our stock price may make it more difficult to attract, retain, and motivate employees. In addition, we do not have long-term employment agreements with any of our key personnel and do not maintain any “key person” life insurance policies. The loss of the services of any of our senior management or other key personnel, or our inability to attract highly qualified senior management and other key personnel, could harm our business.

The distribution of PayPal common stock may be delayed or rescinded if certain required regulatory approvals are not obtained.

The distribution is subject to the satisfaction (or waiver by eBay in its sole discretion) of certain conditions set forth in the separation and distribution agreement. eBay may delay the distribution even after the record date set by the eBay board for the distribution, and (if the conditions to the distribution are not met) eBay may rescind the distribution even after having declared the dividend and set the record date. One of the conditions to the distribution is the receipt of any required approvals of the Commission de Surveillance du Secteur Financier of Luxembourg (the “CSSF”) and the European Central Bank (the “ECB”) to the distribution. The approval of the ECB is required under the European Union’s recently implemented system of financial supervision over credit institutions operating in the European Union, called the single supervisory mechanism. Under this system, for countries in the European Union that use the Euro (or have otherwise opted in), a national competent authority (“NCA”), in our case, the CSSF, must assess a proposed acquisition of holdings in a credit institution. If the NCA is satisfied that the application complies with national conditions for authorizations, it will propose to the ECB a draft decision containing its assessment and recommendations. The ECB will review the NCA’s assessment and has the right to oppose it. This process is very new, and procedures have only recently been developed.

The ECB has informed eBay that it considers the distribution of PayPal common stock to constitute an acquisition of holdings in our Luxembourg banking subsidiary and, therefore, that the distribution is subject to this new review process. We have submitted our application to the CSSF, which has made its assessment and forwarded its dossier on our application to the ECB. Although we do not expect the ECB to oppose the distribution and currently expect to receive the approval of the ECB in advance of the scheduled distribution date, there is no assurance that the ECB will provide its approval on this timeline, or at all. If the ECB does not provide its approval prior to July 17, 2015, the distribution will not occur on that date, and trades made in the “when-issued” market will not be settled until a later date. Should the delay be prolonged, eBay may be forced to formally rescind the declaration of the distribution and set a new record date. If the distribution is delayed due to this condition, changing market or other conditions during such delay could affect the aggregate market value of PayPal common stock following the separation.

The combined post-separation value of eBay and PayPal common stock may not equal or exceed the pre-separation value of eBay common stock.

As a result of the distribution, eBay expects the trading price of eBay common stock immediately following the distribution to be lower than the “regular-way” trading price of such common stock immediately prior to the distribution because the trading price will no longer reflect the value of the Payments business held by PayPal. The aggregate market value of the eBay common stock and the PayPal common stock following the separation may be higher or lower than the market value of eBay common stock immediately prior to the separation.

We may not achieve some or all of the expected benefits of the separation, and the separation could harm our business.

We may not be able to achieve the full strategic and financial benefits expected to result from the separation, or such benefits may be delayed or not occur at all. The separation and distribution is expected to provide the following benefits, among others: enhanced strategic and management focus; better ability to form strategic partnerships and relationships; faster decision-making; more efficient allocation of capital; alignment of incentives with performance objectives; direct access to the capital markets; and a distinct investment identity. For more information regarding the reasons for the separation, please refer to “The Separation and Distribution.”

We may not achieve these and other anticipated benefits for a variety of reasons, including, among others:

If we fail to achieve some or all of the benefits expected to result from the separation, or if such benefits are delayed, our business could be harmed.

If the distribution, together with certain related transactions, does not qualify as a transaction that is generally tax-free for U.S. federal income tax purposes under Sections 368(a)(1)(D) and 355 of the Internal Revenue Code (the “Code”), eBay, PayPal and eBay stockholders could be subject to significant tax liabilities and, in certain circumstances, we could be required to indemnify eBay for material taxes pursuant to indemnification obligations under the tax matters agreement.

A condition to the distribution is the receipt by eBay of an opinion from eBay’s outside legal counsel regarding the qualification of the distribution, together with certain related transactions, as a transaction that is generally tax-free for U.S. federal income tax purposes under Sections 368(a)(1)(D) and 355 of the Code. The opinion will be based on and rely on, among other things, certain facts and assumptions, as well as certain representations, statements and undertakings of eBay and PayPal, including those relating to the past and future conduct of eBay and PayPal. If any of these representations, statements or undertakings are, or become, inaccurate or incomplete, or if eBay or PayPal breach any of their respective covenants in the separation documents, the opinion of counsel may be invalid and the conclusions reached therein could be jeopardized.

Notwithstanding the opinion of counsel, the IRS could determine that the distribution, together with certain related transactions, should be treated as a taxable transaction if the IRS determines that any of these representations, assumptions, or undertakings upon which such opinion was based are incorrect or have been violated or if the IRS disagrees with the conclusions in the opinion of counsel. An opinion of counsel is not binding on the IRS or any court and there can be no assurance that the IRS will not challenge the conclusions reached in the opinion. The IRS will not provide any opinion in advance of the separation that our proposed transaction will be tax-free.

If the distribution, together with certain related transactions, failed to qualify as a transaction that is generally tax-free under Sections 368(a)(1)(D) and 355 of the Code, in general, eBay would recognize taxable gain as if it had sold the PayPal common stock in a taxable sale for its fair market value, eBay stockholders who receive PayPal common stock in the distribution would be subject to tax as if they had received a taxable distribution equal to the fair market value of such shares and we could incur significant liabilities. For more information, please refer to “Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences.”

We may not be able to engage in desirable strategic or capital-raising transactions following the separation. In addition, we could be liable for adverse tax consequences resulting from engaging in significant strategic or capital-raising transactions.

To preserve the tax-free treatment to eBay of the separation and the distribution, under the tax matters agreement that we will enter into with eBay, for a period of time following the distribution, we generally will be prohibited from taking certain actions that prevent the distribution and related transactions from qualifying as a transaction that is generally tax-free, for U.S. federal income tax purposes under Sections 368(a)(1)(D) and 355 of the Code.

These restrictions may limit our ability to pursue certain strategic transactions or other transactions that may maximize the value of our business. For more information, please refer to “Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences” and “Certain Relationships and Related Person Transactions—The Tax Matters Agreement.”

We have no history of operating as an independent company in our current form, and our historical and pro forma financial information is not necessarily representative of the results that we would have achieved as a separate, publicly traded company and may not be a reliable indicator of our future results.

Our historical information provided in this information statement refers to our business as operated by and integrated with eBay. Our historical and pro forma financial information included in this information statement is derived from the consolidated financial statements and accounting records of eBay. Accordingly, the historical and pro forma financial information included in this information statement does not necessarily reflect the financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows that we would have achieved as a separate, publicly traded company during the periods presented or those that we will achieve in the future primarily as a result of the factors described below:

Other significant changes may occur in our cost structure, management, financing, and business operations as a result of operating as a company separate from eBay. For additional information about the past financial performance of our business and the basis of presentation of the historical combined financial statements and the unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial statements of our business, see “Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined Financial Statements,” “Selected Historical Combined Financial Data of PayPal,” “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and the historical financial statements and accompanying notes included elsewhere in this information statement.

After the distribution, we will derive a significant amount of revenues from eBay. If the operating agreement expires or if eBay terminates the operating agreement prior to its expiration or there is a significant change in our relationship with eBay, including if eBay becomes a merchant of record, eliminates or modifies any of its risk management or customer protection programs, directs transactions to a different provider of payment services or offers eBay customers more payment options, our business could be harmed.

Until the separation occurs, eBay has sole discretion to change the terms of the separation in ways which may be unfavorable to us.

Until the separation occurs, we will be a wholly owned subsidiary of eBay. Accordingly, eBay will effectively have the sole and absolute discretion to determine and change the terms of the separation, including the terms of any agreements between eBay and us. These changes could be unfavorable to us. In addition, eBay may decide at any time not to proceed with the separation and distribution.

eBay may fail to perform under various transaction agreements that will be executed as part of the separation or it may fail to have necessary systems and services in place when certain of the transaction agreements expire.

In connection with the separation, we will enter into a separation and distribution agreement with eBay and will also enter into various other agreements, including an operating agreement, colocation services agreements, a transition services agreement, a tax matters agreement, an employee matters agreement, an intellectual property matters agreement, a data sharing addendum, and a product development agreement. The separation agreement, the tax matters agreement, the employee matters agreement, and intellectual property matters agreement will determine the allocation of assets and liabilities (including by means of licensing) between the companies following the separation for those respective areas and will include any necessary indemnifications related to liabilities and obligations. The operating agreement, colocation services agreements and data sharing addendum will establish certain commercial relationships between eBay and us related to payment processing, credit, information technology infrastructure and data sharing. The transition services agreement will provide for the performance of certain services by each company for the benefit of the other for a limited period of time after the separation. We will rely on eBay to satisfy its performance and payment obligations under these agreements. If eBay is unable to satisfy its obligations under these agreements, including its indemnification obligations, we could incur operational difficulties or losses. If we do not have in place our own systems and services, or if we do not have agreements with other providers of these services once these transaction agreements expire or terminate, we may not be able to operate our business effectively and our profitability may decline.

Our accounting and other management systems and resources may not be adequately prepared to meet the financial reporting and other requirements to which we will be subject following the distribution.

Our financial results previously were included within the consolidated results of eBay, and its reporting and control systems were appropriate for subsidiaries of a public company. Prior to the distribution, we were not directly subject to reporting and other requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. After the distribution, we expect to be subject to such reporting and other requirements in 2016, which will require, among other things, annual management assessments of the effectiveness of our internal controls over financial reporting and a report by our independent registered public accounting firm addressing these assessments. These and other obligations will place significant demands on our management, administrative, and operational resources, including accounting and information technology resources. To comply with these requirements, we anticipate that we will need to upgrade our systems, including duplicating computer hardware infrastructure, implement additional financial and management controls, reporting systems and procedures, and hire additional accounting, finance and information technology staff. If we are unable to do this in a timely and effective fashion, our ability to comply with our financial reporting requirements and other rules that apply to reporting companies could be impaired and our business could be harmed.

After the separation, certain of our directors may have actual or potential conflicts of interest because of their previous or continuing positions at eBay.

Because of their current or former positions with eBay, certain of our expected directors own eBay common stock and equity awards. Following the separation, even though our board of directors will consist of a majority of directors who are independent, some of our directors will continue to have a financial interest in eBay common stock and equity awards. In addition, it is expected that one of our directors will continue serving on the board of directors of eBay. Continuing ownership of eBay common stock and equity awards, or service as a director at both companies could create, or appear to create, potential conflicts of interest if PayPal and eBay have disagreements about the contracts between them that continue or face decisions that could have different implications for PayPal and eBay.

A public market for our common stock does not currently exist. We anticipate that on or prior to the record date for the distribution, trading of shares of our common stock will begin on a “when-issued” basis which will continue through the distribution date. However, we cannot guarantee that an active trading market will develop or be sustained for our common stock after the separation. Nor can we predict the prices at which shares of our common stock may trade after the separation. Similarly, we cannot predict the effect of the separation on the price of our common stock or whether the combined market value of our common stock and the eBay common stock will be less than, equal to or greater than the market value of eBay common stock prior to the separation.

The price of our common stock may fluctuate significantly due to a number of factors, some of which may be beyond our control, including:

Many investors holding eBay common stock may hold that stock because of a decision to invest in a company with eBay’s profile. Following the distribution, the shares of our common stock held by those investors will represent an investment in a payments company with a different profile. This may not be aligned with a holder’s investment strategy and may cause the holder to sell the shares. As a result, our stock price may decline or experience volatility as our stockholder base changes.

PayPal’s amended and restated certificate of incorporation will designate the state courts of the State of Delaware, or, if no state court located in the State of Delaware has jurisdiction, the federal court for the District of Delaware, as the sole and exclusive forum for certain types of actions and proceedings that may be initiated by PayPal’s stockholders, which could discourage lawsuits against PayPal and PayPal’s directors and officers.

PayPal’s amended and restated certificate of incorporation will provide that unless the corporation otherwise determines, the state courts of the State of Delaware, or, if no state court located in the state of Delaware has jurisdiction, the federal court for the District of Delaware, will be the sole and exclusive forum for any derivative action or proceeding brought on behalf of PayPal, any action asserting a claim of breach of a fiduciary duty owed by any director or officer of PayPal to PayPal or PayPal’s stockholders, creditors or other constituents, any action asserting a claim against PayPal or any director or officer of PayPal arising pursuant to any provision of the Delaware General Corporation Law or PayPal’s amended and restated certificate of incorporation or bylaws, or any action asserting a claim against PayPal or any director or officer of PayPal governed by the internal affairs doctrine. This exclusive forum provision may limit the ability of PayPal’s stockholders to bring a claim in a judicial forum that such stockholders find favorable for disputes with PayPal or PayPal’s directors or officers, which may discourage such lawsuits against PayPal and PayPal’s directors and officers. Alternatively, if a court outside of Delaware were to find this exclusive forum provision inapplicable to, or unenforceable in respect of, one or more of the specified types of actions or proceedings described above, PayPal may incur additional costs associated with resolving such matters in other jurisdictions, which could adversely affect PayPal’s business, financial condition or results of operations.

Certain provisions in PayPal’s amended and restated certificate of incorporation and bylaws may prevent or delay an acquisition of PayPal, which could decrease the trading price of PayPal common stock.

PayPal’s amended and restated certificate of incorporation and amended and restated bylaws will contain certain provisions that may have the effect of deterring coercive takeover practices and inadequate takeover bids by making such practices or bids unacceptably expensive to the bidder and by encouraging prospective acquirers to negotiate with PayPal’s board of directors rather than to attempt a hostile takeover. These provisions include, among others:

PayPal has also elected not to be governed by Section 203 of the DGCL, which provides that, subject to limited exceptions, persons that acquire, or are affiliated with a person that acquires, more than 15% of the outstanding voting stock of a Delaware corporation shall not engage in any business combination with that corporation, including by merger, consolidation or acquisitions of additional shares, for a three-year period following the date on which that person or its affiliates becomes the holder of more than 15% of the corporation’s outstanding voting stock. PayPal’s amended and restated certificate of incorporation will, however, contain a provision that generally mirrors Section 203 of the DGCL, except that there will be a 20% threshold instead of the 15% provided for by the DGCL. These provisions could delay or prevent a change of control that PayPal’s stockholders may favor.

Certain of the above provisions were added pursuant to the agreement between eBay Inc. and certain entities under the control of Carl C. lcahn. These provisions are not intended to make PayPal immune from takeovers. However, these provisions will apply even if the offer may be considered beneficial by some stockholders and could delay or prevent an acquisition that PayPal’s board of directors determines is not in the best interests of PayPal and PayPal’s stockholders. These provisions may also prevent or discourage attempts to remove and replace incumbent directors.

In addition, an acquisition or further issuance of PayPal’s stock could trigger the application of Section 355(e) of the Code. For a discussion of Section 355(e), see “Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences.” Under the tax matters agreement, PayPal would be required to indemnify eBay for any resulting taxes, and this indemnity obligation might discourage, delay or prevent a change of control that PayPal’s stockholders may consider favorable. Please refer to “Certain Relationships and Related Person Transactions” and “Description of PayPal’s Capital Stock” for a more detailed description of these agreements and provisions.

This information statement and other materials eBay and PayPal have filed or will file with the SEC contain, or will contain, certain forward-looking statements regarding business strategies, market potential, future financial performance and other matters. The words “believe,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “project” and similar expressions, among others, generally identify “forward-looking statements,” which speak only as of the date the statements were made. The matters discussed in these forward-looking statements are subject to risks, uncertainties and other factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those projected, anticipated or implied in the forward-looking statements. In particular, information included under “Risk Factors,” “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” “Business,” and “The Separation and Distribution” contain forward-looking statements. Where, in any forward-looking statement, an expectation or belief as to future results or events is expressed, such expectation or belief is based on the current plans and expectations of PayPal management and expressed in good faith and believed to have a reasonable basis, but there can be no assurance that the expectation or belief will result or be achieved or accomplished. Except as may be required by law, PayPal undertakes no obligation to modify or revise any forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances occurring after the date of this information statement. Factors that could cause actual results or events to differ materially from those anticipated include the matters described under “Risk Factors” and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.”

On September 30, 2014, eBay Inc. (“eBay”) announced its intent to separate its payments business into an independent, publicly-traded company. To accomplish this separation, in January 2015, eBay incorporated PayPal Holdings, Inc. (“PayPal Holdings”) which will ultimately become the parent of PayPal, Inc. and will hold directly or indirectly all of the assets and liabilities associated with PayPal, Inc. eBay intends to effect this separation through a pro rata distribution of the common stock of PayPal Holdings to its stockholders. References to “we,” “our,” “us,” “the Company” or “PayPal” refer to the combined entities of the payments business of eBay, including PayPal, Inc. and certain other assets and liabilities that have been historically held at the eBay corporate level, but are specifically identifiable and attributable to the payments business.

On June 26, 2015, the eBay board of directors approved the distribution of the issued and outstanding shares of PayPal common stock on the basis of one share of PayPal common stock for each share of eBay common stock held as of the close of business on the record date of July 8, 2015.

The separation and distribution as described in this information statement is subject to the satisfaction (or to the extent waiveable, waiver by eBay in its sole discretion) of certain conditions, including the receipt of any required approvals of the Commission de Surveillance du Secteur Financier (the “CSSF”) and the Bank Centrale du Luxembourg, as well as the European Central Bank (“ECB”). For a more detailed description of these conditions, see “—Conditions to the Distribution.” The CSSF has prepared a complete file regarding the separation and distribution for approval by the ECB. Although we currently expect to receive the approval of the ECB in advance of the scheduled distribution date, there is no assurance that the ECB will provide its approval on this timeline, or at all. See “Risk Factors—The distribution of PayPal common stock may be delayed or rescinded if certain required regulatory approvals are not obtained.” PayPal expects that at 11:59 p.m., Eastern Time, on July 17, 2015 following the satisfaction or waiver of the conditions to the distribution, each eBay stockholder will receive one share of PayPal common stock for each share of eBay common stock held at the close of business on the record date for the distribution, as described below. We refer to the date of the distribution of the shares of PayPal common stock as the “distribution date.” You will not be required to make any payment, surrender or exchange your eBay common stock or take any other action to receive your shares of PayPal’s common stock in the distribution.

The eBay board of directors determined that the creation of two independent public companies, with PayPal operating the Payments business, and eBay operating the Marketplaces business is in the best interests of eBay and its stockholders and approved the plan of separation. A wide variety of factors were considered by the eBay board of directors in evaluating the creation of independent public companies. Among other things, the eBay board of directors considered the following expected benefits:

Neither PayPal nor eBay can assure you that, following the separation, any of the benefits described above or otherwise will be realized to the extent anticipated or at all.

The eBay board of directors also considered a number of potentially negative factors in evaluating the creation of independent public companies, including the loss of synergies and joint purchasing power and increased costs resulting from operating as a separate public entity, one-time costs of the separation, and the risk of not realizing the anticipated benefits of the separation. The eBay board of directors concluded that the potential benefits outweighed these factors.

PayPal Holdings was formed in January 2015 for the purpose of owning and operating eBay’s payments business. As part of the plan to create two independent public companies, eBay plans to transfer the equity interests of certain entities that operate the payments business and the assets and liabilities of the payments business to PayPal Holdings prior to the distribution.

With the assistance of Computershare Trust Company, N.A., or Computershare, eBay expects to distribute PayPal common stock at 11:59 p.m., Eastern Time, on the distribution date, to all holders of outstanding eBay common stock as of the close of business on July 8, 2015, the record date for the distribution. Computershare will serve as the settlement and distribution agent in connection with the distribution and the transfer agent and registrar for PayPal common stock.

If you own shares of eBay common stock as of the close of business on the record date for the distribution, PayPal’s common stock that you are entitled to receive in the distribution will be issued electronically, as of the distribution date, to you in direct registration form or to your bank or brokerage firm on your behalf. If you are a registered holder, Computershare will then mail you a direct registration account statement that reflects your shares of PayPal common stock. If you hold your shares through a bank or brokerage firm, your bank or

brokerage firm will credit your account for the shares. Direct registration form refers to a method of recording share ownership when no physical share certificates are issued to shareholders, as is the case in this distribution. If you sell eBay common stock in the “regular-way” market up to and including the distribution date, you will be selling your right to receive shares of PayPal common stock in the distribution.

Commencing on or shortly after the distribution date, if you hold physical stock certificates that represent your shares of eBay common stock and you are the registered holder of the shares represented by those certificates, the distribution agent will mail to you an account statement that indicates the number of shares of PayPal’s common stock that have been registered in book-entry form in your name.

Most eBay stockholders hold their shares of common stock through a bank or brokerage firm. In such cases, the bank or brokerage firm would be said to hold the shares in “street name” and ownership would be recorded on the bank or brokerage firm’s books. If you hold your shares of eBay common stock through a bank or brokerage firm, your bank or brokerage firm will credit your account for the PayPal common stock that you are entitled to receive in the distribution. If you have any questions concerning the mechanics of having shares held in “street name,” please contact your bank or brokerage firm.

Shares of PayPal common stock distributed to holders in connection with the distribution will be transferable without registration under the U.S. Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), except for shares received by persons who may be deemed to be PayPal affiliates. Persons who may be deemed to be PayPal affiliates after the distribution generally include individuals or entities that control, are controlled by or are under common control with PayPal, which may include certain PayPal executive officers, directors or principal stockholders. Securities held by PayPal affiliates will be subject to resale restrictions under the Securities Act. PayPal affiliates will be permitted to sell shares of PayPal common stock only pursuant to an effective registration statement or an exemption from the registration requirements of the Securities Act, such as the exemption afforded by Rule 144 under the Securities Act.

For each share of eBay common stock that you own at the close of business on July 8, 2015, the record date for the distribution, you will receive one share of PayPal common stock on the distribution date. eBay will not distribute any fractional shares of PayPal common stock to its shareholders. Instead, if you are a registered holder of a fractional share of eBay common stock, Computershare (the distribution agent) will aggregate fractional shares into whole shares, sell the whole shares in the open market at prevailing market prices and distribute the aggregate cash proceeds (net of discounts and commissions) of the sales pro rata (based on the fractional share such holder would otherwise be entitled to receive) to each holder who otherwise would have been entitled to receive a fractional share in the distribution. The distribution agent, in its sole discretion, without any influence by eBay or PayPal, will determine when, how, and through which broker-dealer and at what price to sell the whole shares. Any broker-dealer used by the distribution agent will not be an affiliate of either eBay or PayPal. Computershare is not an affiliate of either eBay or PayPal. Neither PayPal nor eBay will be able to guarantee any minimum sale price in connection with the sale of these shares. Recipients of cash in lieu of fractional shares, if any, will not be entitled to any interest on the amounts of payment made in lieu of fractional shares.

The aggregate net cash proceeds of any sales of fractional shares will be taxable for U.S. federal income tax purposes. See “Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences” for an explanation of the material U.S. federal income tax consequences of the distribution. If you hold physical certificates for shares of eBay common stock and are the registered holder, you will receive a check from the distribution agent in an amount equal to your pro rata share of the aggregate net cash proceeds of the sales. PayPal estimates that it will take approximately two weeks from the distribution date for the distribution agent to complete the distributions of the aggregate net cash

proceeds. If you hold your shares of eBay common stock through a bank or brokerage firm, your bank or brokerage firm will receive, on your behalf, your pro rata share of the aggregate net cash proceeds of the sales and will electronically credit your account for your share of such proceeds.

Outstanding awards granted under eBay’s equity compensation programs will be adjusted in accordance with the terms of such programs to reflect the impact of the separation on such awards, with such adjusted awards to relate to shares of eBay and/or PayPal common stock, as applicable, and with appropriate adjustments to the exercise prices (for options) and number of shares subject to such awards. For a more detailed discussion of the treatment of outstanding equity awards, see “Certain Relationships and Related Person Transactions—Employee Matters Agreement.”

After the distribution, PayPal will be an independent, publicly traded company. The actual number of shares to be distributed will be determined at the close of business on July 8, 2015, the record date for the distribution, and will reflect any exercise of eBay options between the date the eBay board of directors declares the distribution and the record date for the distribution. The distribution will not affect the number of outstanding shares of eBay common stock or any rights of eBay shareholders. eBay will not distribute any fractional shares of PayPal common stock.

PayPal will enter into a separation agreement and will enter into other related agreements with eBay before the distribution to effect the separation and provide a framework for PayPal’s relationship with eBay after the separation. These agreements will provide for the allocation between eBay and PayPal of eBay’s assets, liabilities and obligations (including its investments, property and employee benefits and tax-related assets and liabilities) attributable to periods prior to PayPal’s separation from eBay and will govern the relationship between eBay and PayPal after the separation. For a more detailed description of these agreements, see “Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions.”

There is currently no public trading market for PayPal’s common stock. PayPal has applied to have its common stock authorized for listing on The NASDAQ Stock Market under the symbol “PYPL.” PayPal has not and will not set the initial price of its common stock. The initial price will be established by the public markets.

PayPal cannot predict the price at which its common stock will trade after the distribution. The combined trading prices, after the separation, of the shares of PayPal common stock that each eBay shareholder will receive in the distribution and the shares of eBay common stock held at the record date for the distribution may not equal the “regular-way” trading price of a eBay share immediately prior to the separation. The price at which PayPal common stock trades may fluctuate significantly, particularly until an orderly public market develops. Trading prices for PayPal common stock will be determined in the public markets and may be influenced by many factors. See “Risk Factors—Risks Related to PayPal’s Common Stock.”

Beginning on or shortly before the record date for the distribution and continuing up to and including through the distribution date, eBay expects that there will be two markets in eBay common stock: a “regular-way” market and an “ex-distribution” market. Shares of eBay common stock that trade on the “regular-way” market will trade with an entitlement to PayPal common stock distributed pursuant to the separation. Shares of eBay common stock that trade on the “ex-distribution” market will trade without an entitlement to PayPal common stock distributed pursuant to the distribution. Therefore, if you sell shares of eBay common stock in the

“regular-way” market up to and including through the distribution date, you will be selling your right to receive PayPal common stock in the distribution. If you own shares of eBay common stock at the close of business on the record date and sell those shares on the “ex-distribution” market up to and including through the distribution date, you will receive the shares of PayPal common stock that you are entitled to receive pursuant to your ownership as of the record date of the shares of eBay common stock.

Furthermore, beginning on or shortly before the record date for the distribution and continuing up to and including the distribution date, PayPal expects that there will be a “when-issued” market in its common stock. “When-issued” trading refers to a sale or purchase made conditionally because the security has been authorized but not yet issued. The “when-issued” trading market will be a market for shares of PayPal common stock that will be distributed to holders of shares of eBay common stock on the distribution date. If you owned shares of eBay common stock at the close of business on the record date for the distribution, you would be entitled to shares of PayPal common stock distributed pursuant to the distribution. You may trade this entitlement to shares of PayPal common stock, without the shares of eBay common stock you own, on the “when-issued” market, but your transaction will not settle until after the distribution date. On the first trading day following the distribution date, “when-issued” trading with respect to PayPal common stock will end, and “regular-way” trading will begin.

eBay has announced that the distribution will be effective at 11:59 p.m., Eastern Time, on July 17, 2015, provided that the following conditions shall have been satisfied (or if any such condition is waiveable, waived by eBay in its sole discretion):

eBay and PayPal cannot assure you that any or all of these conditions will be met and may also waive any of the conditions to the distribution. In addition, eBay will have the sole and absolute discretion to determine (and change) the terms of, and whether to proceed with, the distribution and, to the extent it determines to so proceed, to determine the record date for the distribution and the distribution date and the distribution ratio. eBay may delay or rescind its declaration of the distribution even after the record date for the distribution, as discussed in more detail under “Risk Factors—Risks Related to the Separation—The distribution of PayPal common stock may be delayed or rescinded if certain required regulatory approvals are not obtained.” eBay does not intend to notify its shareholders of any modifications to the terms of the separation that, in the judgment of its board of directors, are not material. For example, the eBay board of directors might consider material such matters as significant changes to the distribution ratio, the assets to be contributed or the liabilities to be assumed in the separation. To the extent that the eBay board of directors determines that any modifications by eBay materially change the material terms of the distribution, eBay will notify eBay shareholders in a manner reasonably calculated to inform them about such modifications as may be required by law, by, for example, publishing a press release, filing a current report on Form 8-K, or circulating a supplement to this information statement.

PayPal does not expect to pay a regular cash dividend following the distribution. The timing, declaration, amount of and payment of any dividends following the separation by PayPal is within the discretion of its board of directors and will depend upon many factors, including PayPal’s financial condition, earnings, capital requirements of its operating subsidiaries, debt service obligations, covenants associated with certain of PayPal’s debt service obligations, legal requirements, regulatory constraints, industry practice, ability to gain access to capital markets, and other factors deemed relevant by its board of directors. Moreover, if PayPal determines to pay any dividend in the future, there can be no assurance that it will continue to pay such dividends or the amount of such dividends.

The following table sets forth PayPal’s capitalization on a historical basis and on a pro forma basis to give effect to the pro forma adjustments included in PayPal’s unaudited pro forma financial information as if the separation and distribution took place on March 31, 2015. The information below is not necessarily indicative of what PayPal’s capitalization would have been had the separation, distribution and related financing transactions been completed as of March 31, 2015. In addition, it is not indicative of PayPal’s future capitalization. This table should be read in conjunction with “Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined Financial Statements,” “Selected Historical Combined Financial Data of PayPal,” “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” and PayPal’s combined financial statements and notes included in the “Index to Financial Statements and Schedule” section of this information statement.

The following selected combined financial data reflects the combined operations of PayPal. PayPal derived the selected combined statement of income data for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012 and the selected combined balance sheet data as of December 31, 2014 and 2013, as set forth below, from its audited combined financial statements, which are included in the “Index to Financial Statements and Schedule” section of this information statement. PayPal derived the selected combined statement of income data for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010 and the selected combined balance sheet data as of December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010 from PayPal’s underlying financial records, which were derived from the financial records of eBay. PayPal derived the selected combined statement of income data for the quarter ended March 31, 2015 and 2014 and selected combined balance sheet data as of March 31, 2015, as set forth below, from its unaudited combined financial statements, included elsewhere in this information statement. PayPal derived the selected combined balance sheet data as of March 31, 2014 from PayPal’s underlying financial records, which were derived from the financial records of eBay. The selected unaudited pro forma combined statement of income data for the quarter ended March 31, 2015 and the year ended December 31, 2014 and the selected pro forma balance sheet data as of March 31, 2015 are derived from the “Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined Financial Statements” included elsewhere in this information statement. The selected unaudited pro forma combined statement of income data has been prepared to reflect certain pro forma transactions in the selected pro forma combined statement of income as if they had occurred or had become effective as of January 1, 2014. The selected unaudited pro forma condensed combined balance sheet has been prepared to give effect to certain pro forma transactions as though they had occurred on March 31, 2015. The assumptions used and pro forma adjustments derived from such assumptions are based on currently available information and we believe such assumptions are reasonable.

The historical and unaudited pro forma combined results do not necessarily indicate the results expected for any future period. To ensure a full understanding, you should read the selected combined financial data presented below in conjunction with “Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined Financial Statements,” “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and the combined financial statements and accompanying notes included elsewhere in this information statement.

The unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial statements presented below have been derived from PayPal’s historical combined financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2014 and as of and for the quarter ended March 31, 2015. The unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial statements should be read in conjunction with PayPal’s historical combined financial statements and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” included in this information statement. The unaudited pro forma condensed combined statement of income has been prepared to give effect to the Pro Forma Transactions (as defined below) as if the Pro Forma Transactions had occurred or had become effective as of January 1, 2014. The unaudited pro forma condensed combined balance sheet has been prepared to give effect to the Pro Forma Transactions as though the Pro Forma Transactions had occurred on March 31, 2015.

Our unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial statements have been prepared based on available information, assumptions, and estimates that management believes are reasonable. The unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial statements are for illustrative and informational purposes only, and do not reflect what PayPal’s financial position and results of operations would have been had the separation occurred on the dates indicated and are not necessarily indicative of its future financial position and future results of operations.

Our unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial statements have been prepared to reflect adjustments to our audited historical combined financial statements that are: (i) factually supportable, (ii) directly attributable to the distribution, and, for purposes of the combined statements of income, (iii) expected to have continuing impact on our results of operations. The unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial statements have been adjusted to give effect to the following (the “Pro Forma Transactions”):

Our historical combined statement of income includes allocations of certain expenses relating to support functions historically provided by eBay. These functions include, but are not limited to: finance, legal, human resources, information technology, employee benefits administration, treasury, investor relations, corporate development, risk management, shared services and other general and administrative costs. To operate as an independent public company, we expect to incur costs to replace those services previously provided by eBay in addition to incremental standalone costs. We expect these incremental costs to be $100 million to $150 million on an annual pre-tax basis. Due to the scope and complexity of these activities, the amount and timing of these incremental costs could vary and, consequently, are not included in the Pro Forma Transactions.

The unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial statements constitute forward-looking information and are subject to certain risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those anticipated. See “Cautionary Statement Concerning Forward-Looking Statements” and “Risk Factors” included elsewhere in this information statement.

The calculations of pro forma diluted earnings per share and weighted-average shares outstanding for the period presented are based on the number of shares used to calculate eBay diluted earnings per share for the year ended December 31, 2014 and the quarter ended March 31, 2015, adjusted for the same distribution ratio. This calculation may not be indicative of the dilutive effect that will actually result from PayPal stock-based awards issued in connection with the adjustment of outstanding eBay stock-based awards or the grant of new stock-based awards. The number of dilutive shares of our common stock underlying PayPal stock-based awards issued in connection with the adjustment of outstanding eBay stock-based awards will not be determined until after the distribution date.

We are unable to calculate historical basic and diluted earnings per share prior to the distribution because the financial information included in the filing has been prepared on a combined basis. These financial statements have not been prepared for a separate legal entity that had share capital throughout the historical periods presented and accordingly, earnings per share for these periods has not been provided.

PayPal Holdings, Inc. (“we,” “our,” “us,” “the Company” or “PayPal”) is a leading technology platform company that enables digital and mobile payments on behalf of consumers and merchants worldwide. We put our customers at the center of everything we do. We strive to increase our relevance for consumers, merchants, friends and family to access and move their money anywhere in the world, anytime, on any platform and through any device (e.g., mobile, tablets, personal computers or wearables). We provide safer and simpler ways for businesses of all sizes to accept payments from merchant websites, mobile devices and applications, and at offline retail locations through a wide range of payment solutions across our Payments Platform, including PayPal, PayPal Credit, Venmo and Braintree products.

We enable global commerce by providing payment solutions for our approximately 162 million active customer accounts in over 200 markets, while providing customers a choice of how they would like to pay or get paid. A market is a geographic area or political jurisdiction, such as a country, territory, or protectorate, in which we offer our services. A country, territory or protectorate is identified by a distinct set of laws and regulations. An active customer account is a registered account that successfully sent or received at least one payment or payment reversal through our Payments Platform, excluding transactions processed through our gateway products, in the past 12 months. Our gateway products include our Payflow Payments and certain Braintree products. A payment gateway links a merchant’s website to that merchant’s processing network and merchant account.

We offer our customers the flexibility to use their account to both purchase and be paid for goods, as well as transfer and withdraw funds. A consumer can typically fund a purchase using a bank account, a PayPal account balance, a PayPal Credit account, a credit or debit card or other stored value products such as coupons and gift cards. Our PayPal and Venmo products also make it safer and simpler for friends and family to transfer funds to each other using several of these funding sources. We offer merchants an end-to-end payments solution that provides authorization and settlement capabilities, as well as instant access to funds. We help merchants connect with their customers and manage risk. We measure the relevance of our products in the lives of our customers, and therefore the success of our business, through both payment volume and payment transactions. Payment volume is the value of payments, net of payment reversals, successfully completed through our Payments Platform, excluding transactions processed through our gateway products (“Total Payment Volume” or “TPV”). During 2014, our TPV was approximately $235 billion, representing growth of 26% over 2013. “Payment transactions” is the total number of payments, net of payment reversals, successfully completed through our Payments Platform, excluding transactions processed through our gateway products. During 2014, payment transactions were approximately 4.0 billion, representing growth of 22% over 2013.

Our Payments Platform is built to make the existing global financial infrastructure work for people in the digital age. PayPal allows people to make seamless transactions between different markets and networks. Our Payments Platform connects with financial institutions around the world, and allows consumers to make purchases using a broad range of payment methods, regardless of where a merchant is located. Consumers who use our Payments Platform can engage in cross-border shopping by sending payments to each other in more than 200 markets across the globe and in more than 100 currencies. This enables merchants to increase sales volume by allowing them to sell across borders to a much larger base of consumers.

We generate revenues by charging fees for providing transaction processing and other payment-related services, primarily based on the volume of activity, or TPV, processed through our Payments Platform. We also earn revenue by providing value added services to consumers and merchants, such as PayPal’s Credit products. Our revenue growth is influenced by, among other things, consumer spending patterns, merchant adoption of payment methods other than traditional credit cards and cash, the expansion of multi-channel retail, the growth of mobile devices and merchant applications on those devices, the growth of consumers with access to the internet globally, the pace of transition from paper-based forms of payment to digital forms of payment, our share of the digital payments market, and our ability to innovate new methods of payment that merchants and consumers find to be valuable. Our strategy is to drive revenue growth by:

PayPal is a popular form of payment for mobile commerce, and our business has grown with the increased adoption of mobile devices. In December 2013, we completed our acquisition of Braintree to strengthen our position in mobile payments and extend our coverage to a new class of retailers who offer their services primarily through mobile applications. As part of that acquisition, we also acquired Venmo, which offers a leading mobile application to move money between friends and family using their mobile device. Braintree’s and Venmo’s focus on mobile payments, their reach with a new class of retailers and the technology obtained through the acquisition have increased our payment capabilities, improved our current product offerings and expanded our footprint with earlier stage merchants and a diversified demographic of consumers.

We operate globally and in a rapidly evolving regulatory environment characterized by a heightened regulatory focus on all aspects of the payments industry. Some of the laws and regulations to which we are subject were enacted recently and many such laws and regulations, including those enacted prior to the advent of digital and mobile payments, are continuing to evolve through legislative and regulatory action and judicial interpretation. Changes in or non-compliance with laws and regulations, changes in the interpretation of laws and regulations, and the enactment of new laws and regulations applicable to us could have a material adverse impact on our business, results of operations and financial condition. Therefore, we monitor these areas closely to ensure compliant solutions for our customers who depend on us.

We operate a proprietary global technology platform that links merchants and consumers around the globe to facilitate the processing of payment transactions, allowing us to connect millions of merchants and consumers worldwide. Our Payments Platform facilitates an efficient and secure means for merchants to receive payments, and

a convenient, secure way for consumers to make payments. We process transactions through our Payments Platform in more than 200 markets, allowing customers to pay and get paid in more than 100 currencies, withdraw funds to their bank accounts in 57 currencies and hold balances in their PayPal accounts in 26 currencies.

A transaction on our Payments Platform can involve up to three participants in addition to us: a merchant, a consumer and the consumer’s funding source provider. The following diagram illustrates a typical payment transaction between a consumer and a merchant on our Payments Platform:

We enable consumers to more safely exchange funds with merchants using their PayPal digital wallet. Our digital wallet provides consumers with the ability to draw funds from a variety of their financial resources, which may include both “internal” sources of funds (i.e., a PayPal account balance or PayPal Credit account) and sources of funds that are “external” to PayPal (e.g., bank transfers, credit and debit cards or gift cards), within one application. We generally do not charge consumers to fund or draw from their accounts; however, we generate revenue from consumers on fees charged to exchange currencies and on interest and fees from consumer loans originated through our PayPal Credit products.

We value our relationship with our consumers and invest in this relationship; we strive to provide efficient customer service, account support, protection from loss, and create relevant products. Approximately 8,000 people in our customer service organization work around the clock to provide our consumers with answers and solutions when and where they need them, in over 20 languages. We have operations centers around the world, including in Chandler, Arizona; Hunt Valley, Maryland; Omaha, Nebraska; Berlin, Germany; Dundalk, Ireland; Dublin, Ireland; Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia; Sao Paulo, Brazil; and Shanghai, China that strive to provide high-quality service and support for our customers. We have also developed a number of trust and security programs, including PayPal’s Buyer Protection Program, that provide additional protection to consumers for qualifying

purchases by reimbursing the consumer for the full amount of the purchase if a purchased item does not arrive or does not match the seller’s description (see Protecting Merchants and Consumers discussion below).

Traditional financial institutions often charge fees for basic services provided to their customers, and existing alternatives to these financial institutions, including services to cash a check or pay a bill, are often inconvenient and expensive. We focus on providing low cost consumer products that democratize the access to and movement of money. We believe that managing and moving a consumer’s hard earned money should be a right, not a privilege. Through our technology and products, we believe we can change the status quo and make digital payments more efficient and accessible. We expect person-to-person (or “P2P”) transfers to contribute to this strategy. These P2P products are believed to have network effects, helping to establish relationships with potential PayPal users by allowing them to join the Payments Platform at the time of making or receiving payments, which encourages our natural, user-driven growth. PayPal offers P2P payment solutions through its website, its PayPal mobile application, and through Venmo, a mobile application that enables payment transactions between non-merchant account holders.

As commerce continues to transition from the physical world to the digital world and from domestic commerce to global commerce, our proprietary Payments Platform provides opportunities for merchants to grow their businesses. We partner with merchants to help them grow and expand their businesses by improving sales conversion, providing global reach, offering alternative payment methods (such as easy integration credit products and mobile capabilities), reducing losses through proprietary protection programs and leveraging data analytics. We continue to grow merchant acceptance through business development activities and direct relationships with merchants. We enable merchants to more safely and simply receive payments from our active customer accounts, providing global reach while reducing some of the complexity and friction involved in enabling overseas and cross-border trade. For the year ended December 31, 2014, approximately 48% of PayPal’s TPV involved a merchant outside of the U.S., and approximately 24% was cross-border (i.e., transactions where the merchant and consumer were in different countries).

A merchant can typically open a standard PayPal account and begin accepting payments through PayPal within a few minutes. Most online or mobile merchants can onboard quickly and are not required to invest in new or specialized hardware. Our Payments Platform supports growth with a variety of value added services designed to help businesses of all sizes manage their cash flow, invoice clients, pay bills, and reduce the need for merchants to receive and store sensitive customer financial information. For our standard service, we do not charge merchants setup or recurring fees. A merchant can also integrate with Braintree to begin accepting payments with credit or debit cards, PayPal, Venmo, digital currencies such as Bitcoin, or other payment solutions with a single integration.

Our payment and PayPal Credit products, are designed to help merchants increase the conversion rate of consumer purchases on their websites and mobile applications. For example, our One Touch product allows consumers to authenticate their account during their first One Touch purchase. This enables them to skip the login process for future payments and turn shopping into a one touch operation with near-instant authentication. We also provide the ability for merchants to offer (and consumers to fund) payments via a deferred payment option using our PayPal Credit products. When a consumer funds a purchase using PayPal Credit, our chartered financial institution in Luxembourg, or an independent chartered financial institution in the U.S. with whom we partner, extends credit to the consumer, funds the extension of credit at the point of sale (“POS”) and advances funds to the merchant. In the U.S., we subsequently purchase the consumer receivables related to the consumer loans from the independent chartered financial institution with whom we partnered and as a result of that purchase, bear the risk of loss on the related consumer receivables, less the participation interest held by the independent chartered financial institution. We are responsible for all servicing functions related to the PayPal Credit customer account balances. In addition, we have a program in which we offer certain of our merchants a line of credit, which may be paid back to PayPal through a percentage of their sales generated through PayPal.

We value our relationship with merchants and invest in this relationship by providing customer service, account support, developer advocacy and support, and proprietary risk and security solutions. In addition to our consumer protection programs, we have also developed PayPal’s Seller Protection Program. This program provides protection to merchants against claims that a transaction was not authorized by the buyer or claims that an item was not received by covering the seller for the full amount of the payment on eligible sales. By offering dual buyer and seller protection programs, both the consumer and merchant can transact with confidence.

Our Payments Platform and open application programming interfaces (“APIs”) are designed to allow developers to innovate with ease and to offer cutting edge applications to a large ecosystem of merchants and consumers, while at the same time maintaining the security of our customers’ financial information. We provide developers with easy to use, flexible and powerful tools that are designed to leverage our global reach and payment capabilities. Our software developer kits (“SDKs”) are specifically focused on the mobile application market and are designed to remove friction by not requiring a redirect to PayPal.com or an additional log in. We are using a true “mobile first” approach to make payments simple and intuitive.

We earn revenues primarily by processing customer transactions on our Payments Platform and from other value added services. Our revenues are classified into the following two categories:

Transaction revenues are generated from fees charged to merchants on the TPV that we enable. Growth in TPV is also directly impacted by the number of active customer accounts and the payment transactions that we enable on our payments platform. In 2014, transaction revenues generated from customers and merchants on eBay’s marketplace who completed a transaction using our products constituted 29% of our net revenues, down from 32% in 2013. The decline in percentage of revenues generated from eBay buyers and eBay sellers reflects the growth in adoption of PayPal solutions on platforms other than eBay. No other source of revenue represented more than 10% of our revenues.

Our pricing varies among regions and can be modified for individual merchants through customer-specific agreements, which provide merchants with financial incentives and other benefits to issue, accept, route, prioritize and promote our branded products and other payment programs. These financial incentives may be based on TPV or other performance-based criteria, such as issuance of new payment products, increased acceptance of our products, launch of new programs or execution of marketing initiatives.

Protecting merchants and consumers from loss is imperative to successfully competing in the payments industry. Trust and security are essential for our customers, and PayPal invests significantly in providing both merchants and consumers with comprehensive protection. The risk to merchants and consumers (and their payments partners) from fraudulent activities, such as account takeover, identity theft and counterparty mal-intent, is growing. Our ability to protect both consumers and merchants is based largely on our ability to leverage the data we collect on transactions and our analytical capabilities. We believe mobile devices will play an important part in the future of commerce, creating the opportunities to make our ecosystem safer. For example, PayPal is able to use accurate location data and growing protection for the mobile operating environment to reduce risk to merchants and consumers.

We enable consumers to make payments safely and simply without sharing sensitive financial information, such as credit card or debit card numbers, with merchants or other consumers. To make payments using PayPal, consumers need to disclose only their email address or mobile phone number to merchants. The account-based nature of our Payments Platform helps us to better detect and prevent fraud when funds enter, flow through and exit the Payments Platform because our transactions are tokenized and because payment authorization credentials are separated from account holder information. Our ongoing investment in systems and processes designed to enhance the safety and security of our products reflects our goal of having PayPal recognized as one of the world’s most trusted payments brands.

We provide merchants and consumers with protection programs on substantially all transactions completed through our Payments Platform, except for transactions using our gateway products. These programs protect both merchants and consumers from loss primarily due to fraud and counterparty performance. Our risk management capabilities allow us to provide these protections, which are generally much broader than those protections provided by other participants in the payments industry. Most payments providers do not offer merchant protection in general, and those that do so generally do not provide protection of online or card not present transactions. As a result, merchants may incur losses for chargebacks and other claims on certain transactions when using other payments providers that they would not incur if they had used PayPal’s payments services. PayPal also provides consumer protection against losses and accepts claims for 180 days post transaction in the markets that PayPal serves. This protection is consistent with, or better than, that offered by other payments providers. We believe that as a result of these programs, consumers can be confident that they will only be required to pay if they receive the product in the condition as described, and merchants can be confident that they will receive payment for the product that they are delivering to the customer.

Our Payments Platform utilizes a combination of proprietary technologies and services as well as technologies and services provided by third parties. We have developed intuitive user interfaces, customer tools and transaction processing, database and network applications that help enable our users to reliably and securely complete transactions on our sites and help our customers to utilize its suite of services. Our technology infrastructure simplifies the storage and processing of large amounts of data, eases the deployment and operation of large-scale global products and services and automates much of the administration of large-scale clusters of computers. Our technology infrastructure has been designed around industry-standard architectures to reduce downtime in the event of outages or catastrophic occurrences. We strive to continually improve our technology infrastructure to enhance the customer experience and to increase efficiency, scalability and security.

Our Payments Platform’s architecture enables us to connect all parties regardless of whether the transaction is occurring at a traditional physical location, online or through a mobile device. The Payments Platform incorporates multiple layers of protection, both for continuity purposes and to help address cyber-security challenges. We engage in multiple efforts to protect the Payments Platform against these challenges, including regularly testing our systems to address potential vulnerabilities.

The protection of our intellectual property, including our trademarks (particularly those covering the PayPal name), patents, copyrights, domain names, trade dress and trade secrets is critical to our success. We aggressively protect our intellectual property rights by relying on federal, state and common law rights in the U.S. and internationally, as well as a variety of administrative procedures. We also rely on contractual restrictions to protect our proprietary rights in products and services. We have routinely entered into confidentiality and invention assignment agreements with our employees and contractors and nondisclosure agreements with parties with whom we conduct business to control access to and limit disclosure of our proprietary information.

We pursue the registration of our domain names, trademarks and service marks in the U.S. and internationally. Additionally, we have filed U.S. and international patent applications covering certain aspects of our proprietary

technology. Effective trademark, copyright, patent, domain name, trade dress and trade secret protection is very expensive to maintain and may require litigation. We must protect our intellectual property and other proprietary rights in an increasing number of jurisdictions, a process that is expensive and time consuming and may not be successful.

We have registered our core brands as trademarks and domain names in the U.S. and a large number of other jurisdictions and have in place an active program to continue to secure trademarks and domain names that correspond to our brands in markets of interest.

Consumers may choose to pay merchants through a variety of alternative means, including credit and debit cards, automated clearing house and bank transfers, other online payment services, offline payment methods such as cash, check or money order and by using mobile phones. PayPal’s products compete with products from three-party networks (such as American Express and Discover), four-party networks (such as Visa and MasterCard) and other mobile payment solutions.

PayPal seeks to differentiate itself from industry participants on the safety of the transaction (our risk management capabilities as well as protection of consumer account details), the simplicity provided for digital transactions (use of an e-mail address, a mobile phone number or our One Touch product), and being both brand and technology agnostic. Further, unlike traditional four-party networks or other mobile payment solutions, PayPal has a direct financial relationship with both its consumers and merchants. As a result of our risk management capabilities, PayPal can provide its customers with protection from fraud and other losses incurred by participants to a transaction.

To compete effectively, we will need to continue to expend significant resources in technology and marketing. During 2014, PayPal incurred over $1 billion on product innovation and development, and enhancing our infrastructure, to ensure our customers have the capabilities they need and want to complete transactions safely and simply. Further, in 2014, we incurred over $270 million related to our efforts to promote our brands through advertising, promotions, and other strategic initiatives. Our marketing efforts play an important role in building brand visibility, usage and overall preference among consumers at checkout.

Government regulation impacts key aspects of our business. We are subject to regulations that affect the payments industry in the countries we operate.

Payments Regulation. Various laws and regulations govern the payments industry in the U.S. and globally. In the U.S., several of our subsidiaries hold licenses to operate as a money transmitter (or its equivalent), which, among other things, subjects those subsidiaries to reporting requirements, bonding requirements, limitations on the investment of customer funds and inspection by state regulatory agencies. Outside the U.S., we provide localized versions of our service to customers through various foreign subsidiaries. The activities of those non-U.S. entities are, or may, be supervised by a financial regulatory authority in the jurisdictions in which they operate. Among other regulatory authorities, the Luxembourg Commission de Surveillance du Secteur Financier (the “CSSF”), the Australian Securities and Investments Commission, the Monetary Authority of Singapore, the Reserve Bank of India and the Central Bank of Russia have asserted jurisdiction over some or all of our activities in a particular country. This list is not exhaustive, as there are numerous other regulatory agencies that have or may assert jurisdiction. The laws and regulations applicable to the payments industry in any given jurisdiction are subject to interpretation and change.

Banking Agency Supervision. We serve our customers in the European Union through PayPal (Europe) S.a.r.l. et Cie, SCA, a wholly-owned subsidiary that is licensed and subject to regulation as a bank in Luxembourg by the CSSF. Consequently, we must comply with rules and regulations of the banking industry related to capitalization,

funds management, corporate governance, anti-money laundering, disclosure, reporting and inspection. We also are, or may be, subject to banking-related regulations in other countries now or in the future related to our role in the financial industry. In addition, based on our relationships with our partner financial institutions in the U.S., we are subject to indirect regulation and examination by these financial institutions’ regulators.

Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (the “CFPB”) has significant authority to regulate consumer financial products in the United States, including consumer credit, deposit, payment, and similar products. The CFPB and other similar regulatory agencies in other jurisdictions may have broad consumer protection mandates that could result in the promulgation and interpretation of rules and regulations that may affect our business.

Anti-Money Laundering. PayPal is subject to anti-money laundering (“AML”) laws and regulations in the U.S. and other jurisdictions outside of the U.S. We have implemented a comprehensive AML program designed to prevent our payment network from being used to facilitate money laundering, terrorist financing, and other illicit activity, or to do business in countries or with persons and entities included on designated country or person lists promulgated by the U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Controls (“OFAC”) and equivalent authorities in other countries. Our AML compliance program is comprised of policies, procedures and internal controls, including the designation of a compliance officer, and is designed to address these legal and regulatory requirements and assist in managing money laundering and terrorist financing risks.

Interchange Fees. Interchange fees associated with four-party payments systems are being reviewed or challenged in various jurisdictions. For example, in the European Union, the Multilateral Interchange Fee (“MIF”) Regulation (which we expect to become effective in 2015) caps credit and debit interchange fees for cards payments and provides for business rules to be complied by any company dealing with card transactions, including PayPal. As a result, the fees that we collect in certain jurisdictions may become the subject of regulatory challenge.

Data Protection and Information Security. Aspects of our operations or business are subject to privacy and data protection regulation in the United States, the European Union and elsewhere. For example, in the United States, we are subject to information safeguarding requirements under the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act that require the maintenance of a written, comprehensive information security program and in Europe, the operations of our Luxembourg bank are subject to information safeguarding requirements under the Luxembourg Banking Act, among other laws. Regulatory authorities around the world are considering numerous legislative and regulatory proposals concerning privacy and data protection. In addition, the interpretation and application of these privacy and data protection laws in the United States, Europe and elsewhere are often uncertain and in a state of flux.

Additional Regulatory Developments. Various regulatory agencies also continue to examine a wide variety of issues, including virtual currencies, identity theft, account management guidelines, privacy, disclosure rules, security and marketing that would impact PayPal.

For an additional discussion on governmental regulation affecting our business, please see the risk factors related to regulation of our payments business and regulation in the areas of consumer privacy, data use and/or security in “Risk Factors —Risk Factors That May Affect Our Business, Results of Operations and Financial Condition” included elsewhere in this Information Statement.

accrue the low end of the range. For those proceedings in which an unfavorable outcome is reasonably possible but not probable, we have disclosed an estimate of the reasonably possible loss or range of losses or we have concluded that an estimate of the reasonably possible loss or range arising directly from the proceeding (i.e., monetary damages or amounts paid in judgment or settlement) are not material. If we cannot estimate the probable or reasonably possible loss or range of losses arising from a legal proceeding, we have disclosed that fact. In assessing the materiality of a legal proceeding, we evaluate, among other factors, the amount of monetary damages claimed, as well as the potential impact of non-monetary remedies sought by plaintiffs (e.g., injunctive relief) that may require us to change our business practices in a manner that could have a material adverse impact on our business. With respect to the matters disclosed below, we are unable to estimate the possible loss or range of losses that could potentially result from the application of such non-monetary remedies.

Amounts accrued for legal and regulatory proceedings for which we believe a loss is probable were not material for the year ended December 31, 2014. Except as otherwise noted for the proceedings described below, we have concluded, based on currently available information, that reasonably possible losses arising directly from the proceedings (i.e., monetary damages or amounts paid in judgment or settlement) in excess of our recorded accruals are also not material to PayPal. However, legal and regulatory proceedings are inherently unpredictable and subject to significant uncertainties. If one or more matters were resolved against us in a reporting period for amounts in excess of management’s expectations, the impact on our operating results or financial condition for that reporting period could be material.

We routinely report to the U.S. Department of Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (“OFAC”) on payments we have rejected or blocked pursuant to OFAC sanctions regulations and on any possible violations of those regulations. We have cooperated with OFAC in recent years regarding our review process over transaction monitoring and have self-reported a large number of small dollar amount transactions that could possibly be in violation of OFAC sanctions regulations. In March 2015, we reached a settlement with OFAC regarding the possible violations arising from our practices between 2009 and 2013, before our implementation of real-time monitoring processes. In addition, we continue to cooperate with OFAC regarding more recent self-reported transactions that could also possibly be in violation of OFAC sanctions regulations. Such self-reported transactions could result in claims or actions against us including litigation, injunctions, damage awards or require us to change our business practices that could result in a material loss, require significant management time, result in the diversion of significant operational resources or otherwise harm our business.

On August 7, 2013 and January 13, 2014, eBay, PayPal and certain wholly owned subsidiaries of PayPal received Civil Investigative Demands (“CIDs”) from the CFPB requesting that we provide testimony, produce documents and provide information relating primarily to the acquisition, management, and operation of our PayPal Credit products, including online credit products and services, advertising, loan origination, customer acquisition, servicing, debt collection, and complaints handling practices. We have cooperated with the CFPB throughout the course of the investigation. In May 2015, we entered into a Consent Order with the CFPB in which we settled potential allegations arising from PayPal Credit practices between 2011 and 2015. This settlement included $15 million in redress to consumers, a $10 million civil monetary penalty, and our agreement to various changes to our disclosures and business practices. We will continue to cooperate and engage with the CFPB and work to ensure compliance with the settlement terms. Violation of the settlement could result in claims or actions against us, including litigation, injunctions, or damage awards or require us to change our business practices that could result in a material loss, require significant management time, result in the diversion of significant operational resources or otherwise harm our business.

Following media reports about future revisions to our user agreement, the New York Attorney General’s office has sent us a letter expressing concern and asking us to respond to certain questions. The Federal Communications Commission, the Federal Trade Commission and four senators have also contacted us regarding this subject. We are in the process of responding to these parties.

Other third parties have from time to time claimed, and others may claim in the future, that we have infringed their intellectual property rights. We are subject to patent disputes, and expect that we will increasingly be subject to additional patent infringement claims involving various aspects of our business as our products and services continue to expand in scope and complexity. Such claims may be brought directly or indirectly against our companies and/or against our customers (who may be entitled to contractual indemnification under their contracts with us), and we are subject to increased exposure to such claims as a result of our recent acquisitions, particularly in cases where we are entering into new lines of business in connection with such acquisitions. We have in the past been forced to litigate such claims, and we believe that additional lawsuits alleging such claims will be filed against us. Intellectual property claims, whether meritorious or not, are time consuming and costly to defend and resolve, could require expensive changes in our methods of doing business or could require us to enter into costly royalty or licensing agreements on unfavorable terms.

From time to time, we are involved in other disputes or regulatory inquiries that arise in the ordinary course of business, including suits by our customers (individually or as class actions) alleging, among other things, improper disclosure of our prices, rules or policies, that our practices, prices, rules, policies or customer/user agreements violate applicable law or that we have acted unfairly and/or not acted in conformity with such prices, rules, policies or agreements. In addition to these types of disputes and regulatory inquiries, our operations are also subject to regulatory and/or legal review and/or challenges that tend to reflect the increasing global regulatory focus to which the payments industry is subject and, when taken as a whole with other regulatory and legislative action, such actions could result in the imposition of costly new compliance burdens on our business and customers and may lead to increased costs and decreased transaction volume and revenue. Further, the number and significance of these disputes and inquiries are increasing as our company has grown larger, our business has expanded in scope (both in terms of the range of products and services that we offer and our geographical operations) and our products and services have increased in complexity. Any claims or regulatory actions against us, whether meritorious or not, could be time consuming, result in costly litigation, damage awards (including statutory damages for certain causes of action in certain jurisdictions), injunctive relief or increased costs of doing business through adverse judgment or settlement, require us to change our business practices in expensive ways, require significant amounts of management time, result in the diversion of significant operational resources or otherwise harm our business.

We own and lease various properties in the U.S. and other countries around the world. We use the properties for executive and administrative offices, data centers, product development offices, fulfillment centers and customer service offices. As of December 31, 2014, our owned and leased properties provided us with aggregate square footage as follows:

Our corporate headquarters are located in San Jose, California and occupy approximately 0.7 million of owned square feet.

The Company does not experience meaningful seasonality. No individual quarter in 2014, 2013 or 2012 accounted for more than 30% of net revenue.

See “Note 9—Segment and Geographical Information” to the combined financial statements included in this information statement for certain financial information about segments.

As of December 31, 2014, we employed approximately 15,800 people globally, of whom approximately 9,100 of our employees were located in the U.S. We consider our relationship with employees to be good.

PayPal was incorporated in Delaware in January 2015 for the purpose of owning and operating eBay’s Payments business in connection with the separation and distribution described herein. Prior to the contribution of this business to PayPal, which will occur prior to the distribution, PayPal will have no operations.

The address of PayPal’s principal executive offices is PayPal Holdings, Inc., 2211 North First Street, San Jose, California 95131. PayPal’s telephone number after the distribution will be (408) 967-1000. PayPal maintains an Internet site at www.paypal.com, and its investor relations site will be accessible prior to the distribution at http://investor.paypal-corp.com. PayPal’s website and the information contained therein or connected thereto shall not be deemed to be incorporated herein, and you should not rely on any such information in making an investment decision.

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Please read the following discussion in conjunction with the audited combined financial statements, which are comprised of the payments business of eBay Inc., including PayPal, Inc. and certain other assets and liabilities that have historically been held at the eBay Inc. corporate level, but are specifically identifiable and attributable to the payments business, and corresponding notes, and the unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial statements and corresponding notes included elsewhere in this information statement. This Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations contains forward-looking statements. The matters discussed in these forward-looking statements are subject to risk, uncertainties, and other factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those projected or implied in the forward-looking statements. Please see “Risk Factors” and “Cautionary Statement Concerning Forward-Looking Statements” for a discussion of the uncertainties, risks and assumptions associated with these statements.

On September 30, 2014, eBay Inc. (“eBay”) announced its intent to separate its payments business into an independent, publicly traded company. To accomplish this separation, in January 2015, eBay incorporated PayPal Holdings, Inc. (“PayPal Holdings”) which will ultimately become the parent of PayPal, Inc. and will hold, directly or indirectly, all of the assets and liabilities associated with PayPal, Inc. References to “we,” “our,” “us,” “the Company” or “PayPal” refer to the combined entities of the payments business of eBay, including PayPal, Inc. and certain other assets and liabilities that have been historically held at the eBay corporate level, but are specifically identifiable and attributable to the payments business.

We recorded net income of $419 million in 2014, $955 million in 2013 and $778 million in 2012. The decrease in net income in 2014 was primarily attributable to an increase in income tax expense of $713 million primarily resulting from the recognition of deferred tax liabilities relating to undistributed foreign earnings of certain foreign subsidiaries for 2013 and prior years. We recorded non-GAAP net income of $1.3 billion in 2014, $1.2 billion in 2013 and $1.0 billion in 2012. The increase in non-GAAP net income in 2014 and 2013 was attributable to an increase in operating income in each of these periods.

Net revenues increased 19% in 2014 and 2013. The increase was primarily driven by growth in total payment volume (“TPV”) of 26% in 2014 and 24% in 2013. Operating expenses increased $1.1 billion and $854 million, or 20% and 18% in 2014 and 2013, respectively. The increase was primarily due to an increase in transaction expense, transaction and loan losses, and additional investments in sales and marketing programs and product development initiatives.

Operating income increased $177 million, or 16% in 2014 compared to 2013, and $211 million, or 24% in 2013 compared to 2012. Non-GAAP operating income increased $237 million, or 17%, in 2014 compared to 2013 and $244 million, or 21%, in 2013 compared to 2012. Our non-GAAP operating margin was 21% in 2014, 21% in 2013 and 21% in 2012. Operating income and non-GAAP operating income increased in 2014 and 2013 as a result of the increase in net revenues.

We generated net cash flows from operations of $2.2 billion for the year ended December 31, 2014, compared to $2.0 billion and $1.6 billion for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. We generated free cash flow of $1.7 billion, $1.6 billion and $1.1 billion in 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

The following table provides a summary of our combined operating results for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012:

The following table provides a summary of our combined non-GAAP financial measures for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012:

Please refer to “Non-GAAP Measures” below for discussion of the items excluded from non-GAAP operating income, non-GAAP operating margin and non-GAAP net income.

We recorded net income of $255 million and a net loss of $382 million in the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively. The increase in net income in 2015 was primarily attributable to a decrease in income tax expense of $628 million, primarily resulting from the recognition of deferred tax liabilities in the three months ended March 31, 2014 relating to undistributed foreign earnings of certain foreign subsidiaries for 2013 and prior years. We recorded non-GAAP net income of $360 million and $337 million in the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively.

Net revenues increased 14% in the three months ended March 31, 2015 compared to the same period of the prior year. The increase was primarily driven by growth in TPV of 17%. Operating expenses increased $259 million, or 17%, in the three months ended March 31, 2015 compared to the same period of the prior year. The increase was primarily due to an increase in transaction expense, transaction and loan losses, general and administrative expenses and additional investments in product development initiatives. Operating expenses in the three months ended March 31, 2015 also included $48 million in restructuring expense representing approximately 3% of the growth in total operating expenses compared to the same period in the prior year.

Operating income increased $4 million, or 1% in the three months ended March 31, 2015 compared to the same period of the prior year. Non-GAAP operating income increased $61 million, or 15%, in the three months ended March 31, 2015 compared to the same period of the prior year. Our non-GAAP operating margin was 22% in the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014. Operating income and non-GAAP operating income increased as a result of the increase in net revenues.

We generated net cash flows from operations of $544 million for the three months ended March 31, 2015, compared to $425 million for the three months ended March 31, 2014. We generated free cash flow of $350 million and $325 million in the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively.

The following table provides a summary of our combined operating results for the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014:

The following table provides a summary of our combined non-GAAP financial measures for the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014:

Please refer to “Non-GAAP Measures” below for discussion of the items excluded from non-GAAP operating income, non-GAAP operating margin and non-GAAP net income.

We are a leading technology platform company that enables digital and mobile payments on behalf of consumers and merchants worldwide. We put our customers at the center of everything we do. We strive to increase our relevance for consumers, merchants, friends and family to manage and move their money anywhere in the world, anytime, on any platform and through any device (e.g., mobile, tablets, personal computers or wearables). We provide safer and simpler ways for businesses of all sizes to accept payments from merchant websites, mobile devices and applications, and at offline retail locations through a wide range of payment solutions across our Payments Platform, including PayPal, PayPal Credit, Braintree and Venmo products.

We provide merchants and consumers with protection programs on substantially all transactions completed through our Payments Platform, except for transactions using our gateway products. Our gateway products include our Payflow Payments and certain Braintree products. A payment gateway links a merchant’s website to their processing network and merchant account. Our protection programs protect both merchants and consumers from loss primarily due to fraud and counterparty performance. Our ability to protect both consumers and merchants is based largely on our risk management capabilities, which in turn depend on our ability to leverage the data we collect on transactions and our analytical capabilities. The protections we provide are generally much

broader than those protections provided by other participants in the payments industry. We believe that as a result of these programs, consumers can be confident that they will only be required to pay if they receive the product in the condition as described, and that merchants can be confident that they will receive payment for the product that they are delivering to the customer.

Our Payments Platform and open application programming interfaces (“APIs”) are designed to allow developers to innovate with ease and to offer cutting edge applications to a large ecosystem of merchants and consumers, while at the same time maintaining the security of our customers’ financial information. We provide developers with easy to use, flexible and powerful tools that are designed to leverage our global reach and payment capabilities. Our software developer kits (“SDKs”) are specifically focused on the mobile application market and are designed to remove friction by not requiring a redirect to PayPal.com or an additional login. We are using a true “mobile first” approach to make payments simple and intuitive.

We generated approximately 52% of our 2014 net revenues, 52% of our 2013 net revenues and 51% of our 2012 net revenues from merchants or consumers domiciled outside of the United States. Other than the United States, the United Kingdom was the only country where we generated more than 10% of total net revenues in 2014, 2013 and 2012. During each of these periods, we have also generated more than 10% of total net revenues in the euro zone. Because we have generated substantial net revenues internationally in recent periods, including the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012, we are subject to the risks of doing business in foreign countries as discussed under “Risk Factors—Risk Factors That May Affect Our Business, Results of Operations and Financial Condition.” In that regard, fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates impact our results of operations. We have a foreign currency risk management program that is designed to reduce our exposure to fluctuations in foreign currencies; however, the effectiveness of this program in mitigating the impact of foreign currency fluctuations on our results of operations varies from period to period, and in any given period, operating results are usually affected, sometimes significantly, by changes in foreign currency exchange rates. We calculate the year-over-year impact of foreign currency movements on our business using prior period foreign currency exchange rates applied to current year transactional currency amounts.

The markets for our products are intensely competitive and are subject to rapid technological change, including but not limited to our products’ ability to complete transactions accurately, safely and quickly on merchant websites, within their mobile applications, or in a physical location. Since a large number of merchants accept forms of payment other than PayPal, the use of our product is ultimately a consumer choice. We compete for consumer preference by offering safer and simpler ways to access and move money through any mobile device or personal computer. We face competition from existing online, mobile and offline payment methods.

Our business is subject to regulation in the countries in which we operate, including regulations such as Anti-Money Laundering (“AML”) and Know Your Customer (“KYC”) policies. Information security risks for global payments and technology companies have significantly increased in recent years. Although we have not experienced any material impacts relating to cyber-attacks or other information security breaches on our Payments Platform, there can be no assurance that we are immune to these risks and will not suffer such losses in the future. See our risk factor in “Risk Factors—Risk Factors That May Affect Our Business, Results of Operations and Financial Condition” related to a failure or breach of our security systems or infrastructure as a result of cyber-attacks.

We have significant operations internationally that are denominated in foreign currencies, primarily the Euro, British Pound, and Australian Dollar, subjecting us to foreign currency risk which may adversely impact our financial results. The strengthening or weakening of the U.S. dollar versus the Euro, British Pound and Australian Dollar impacts the translation of our net revenues generated in these foreign currencies into the U.S. dollar. In 2014, foreign currency movements relative to the U.S. dollar negatively impacted net revenues by approximately $58 million (inclusive of a $36 million negative impact from hedging activities). In 2013, foreign

currency movements relative to the U.S. dollar negatively impacted net revenues by approximately $20 million (inclusive of a $4 million negative impact from hedging activities). In 2014 and 2013, foreign currency movements relative to the U.S. dollar did not have a significant impact on net income. Additionally, in connection with our services in multiple currencies, we set our foreign exchange rates twice per day, and may face financial exposure if we incorrectly set our foreign exchange rates or as a result of fluctuations in foreign exchange rates between the times that we set our foreign exchange rates. Given that we also hold some corporate and customer funds in non-U.S. currencies, our financial results are affected by the translation of these non-U.S. currencies into U.S. dollars. While from time to time we enter into transactions to hedge portions of our foreign currency translation exposure, it is impossible to predict or eliminate the effects of this exposure. Fluctuations in foreign exchange rates could significantly impact our financial results.

In the three months ended March 2015 and 2014, we generated approximately 52% of net revenues from customers domiciled outside of the United States. Other than the United States, the United Kingdom was the only country where we generated more than 10% of total net revenues in these periods.

In the three months ended March 31, 2015, foreign currency movements relative to the U.S.dollar negatively impacted net revenues by approximately $80 million (inclusive of a $50 million favorable impact from hedging activities), and decreased total operating expenses by approximately $75 million. Therefore, in the three months ended March 31, 2015, foreign currency movements relative to the U.S. dollar did not have a significant impact on net income. In the three months ended March 31, 2014, foreign currency movements relative to the U.S. dollar negatively impacted net revenues by approximately $8 million (inclusive of a $17 million negative impact from hedging activities).

Transaction revenues are generated from fees charged to merchants on the volume of activity we enable (“Total Payments Volume” or “TPV”). We define TPV as the value of payments, net of payment reversals, successfully completed through our Payments Platform, excluding transactions processed through our gateway products. Our Payments Platform includes PayPal, PayPal Credit, Venmo and Braintree products. Growth in TPV is also directly impacted by the payment transactions that we enable on our payments platform. Payment transactions is the total number of payments, net of payment reversals, successfully completed through our Payments Platform, excluding transactions processed through our gateway products. We earn additional fees on transactions settled in foreign currencies when we enable cross-border transactions. We also earn interest and related fees on receivables from consumers and merchants that use our PayPal Credit products.

The significant components of our net revenue for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012 were as follows:

The increase in transaction revenues in 2014 and 2013 was primarily based on the growth in TPV and the total number of payment transactions on our Payments Platform.

The following table provides a summary of our active customer accounts, number of payment transactions and TPV:

The growth in TPV was driven largely by the increase in the number of payment transactions and active customer accounts in 2014 and 2013. The growth in transaction revenues was lower than the growth in TPV and growth in payment transactions due to a higher portion of TPV generated by large merchants who generally pay lower rates on higher transaction volume. We define large merchants as merchants who have generated TPV greater than $1.2 million in the last 12 months. The impact of increases or decreases in prices charged to our customers did not significantly impact revenue growth in 2014 or 2013.

Net revenues from other value added services increased by 25% and 16% in 2014 and 2013, respectively. The increases were primarily due to interest and fee income earned on loans receivable outstanding from consumers that used our PayPal Credit products as a funding source. The total loans receivable balance as of December 31, 2014 and 2013 was $3.6 billion and $2.8 billion, respectively, reflecting a year over year increase of 29%. In 2013, the increase in interest and fee income was offset by a decrease in revenue share we earn through partnerships and a decrease in net revenues from other services that we provide to consumers and merchants.

The following table summarizes our operating expenses and related metrics we use to assess the trend in each:

Transaction expense is primarily comprised of the costs we incur to accept a customer’s funding source of payment. These costs include fees paid to payment processors and other financial institutions in order to draw funds from a customer’s credit or debit card, bank account or other funding source they have stored in their digital wallet. Transaction expense also includes interest expense on borrowings incurred to finance our portfolio of loans receivable arising from our PayPal Credit funding option. We refer to the allocation of funding sources used by our consumers as our “funding mix.” The cost of funding a transaction with a credit card is generally more costly than the cost of funding a transaction from a bank or through internal sources such as a PayPal account balance or PayPal Credit. As we expand the availability of alternative funding sources to our customers, a change in funding mix can increase or decrease our transaction expense rate. For the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012, approximately 2% of TPV was funded with PayPal Credit.

The increase of $335 million or 18% in transaction expense in 2014 compared to 2013, and the increase of $317 million or 21% in 2013 compared to 2012 is predominantly attributable to an increase in TPV. Our transaction expense rates in 2014 compared to 2013, and in 2013 compared to 2012 have improved due to a favorable funding mix and a larger share of TPV in countries where we pay lower rates for transactions funded with credit cards than in the U.S. In addition, as our technology platform has continued to expand, we are more cost efficient in enabling global payments. For the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012, approximately 48%, 48% and 46% of TPV was outside of the U.S. From time to time, payment card networks have increased, and may increase in the future, the interchange fees and assessments that they charge for each transaction which accesses their networks. Our payment card processors have the right to pass any increases in interchange fees and assessments on to us as well as increase their own fees for processing. Such changes in interchange fees and assessments could increase our transaction expense. Interest expense on borrowings incurred to finance our portfolio of loans receivable, included in Transaction expense, was $7 million, $14 million and $12 million for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

Transaction losses include the expense associated with our customer protection programs, fraud, and chargebacks. Loan losses include the losses associated with our loans receivable balances. We expect our transaction and loan losses to fluctuate depending on many factors, including TPV, macroeconomic conditions, the extent of our customer protection programs, the impact of regulatory changes, and the credit quality of loans receivable arising from transactions funded with our PayPal Credit products. Additionally, we recover certain amounts from eBay related to customer protection programs offered on eligible eBay purchases made with PayPal. These amounts include the transaction losses associated with customer claims and are included as a reduction of transaction and loan losses in the combined statement of income. Our transaction losses will be impacted by the cancellation to this arrangement with eBay following our separation.

The increase of $144 million or 29% in transaction and loan losses in 2014 compared to 2013, and the increase of $137 million or 38% in 2013 compared to 2012 are predominantly attributable to higher TPV and loan losses. Loan losses relating to our loans receivable portfolio were $239 million in 2014, $194 million in 2013 and $134 million in 2012, reflecting an increase of 23% in 2014 compared to 2013, and an increase of 45% in 2013 compared to 2012. The increase in loan losses is due to growth in the portfolio of loans receivable outstanding arising from consumers who chose PayPal Credit as a funding option. The total loans receivable balance as of December 31, 2014 and 2013 was $3.6 billion and $2.8 billion, respectively, reflecting a year over year increase of 29% in each year. The following table provides information regarding the credit quality of a pool of consumer loans and interest receivable balance:

Our transaction and loan loss rates did not fluctuate significantly between 2014 and 2013. Our transaction and loan loss rates increased between 2013 and 2012 primarily due to the increase in losses relating to our loans receivable portfolio. Modifications to our PayPal Credit products acceptable risk parameters during those periods did not have a material impact on our loan losses.

Recoveries associated with transaction losses incurred on eligible eBay purchases during the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012 were $43 million, $48 million and $36 million, respectively.

Customer support and operations expenses include costs incurred to provide 24-hour call support to our customers, our site operations and other infrastructure costs incurred to support our Payments Platform, costs to support our trust and security programs protecting our merchants and consumers and other costs incurred in our operations centers. Customer support and operations costs increased by $105 million, or 11%, in 2014 compared to 2013 and by $136 million, or 17%, in 2013 compared to 2012. The increase was predominantly related to an increase in headcount to service our growing number of active customer accounts and the growth in the number of payment transactions occurring on our Payments Platform.

Sales and marketing expenses consist primarily of customer acquisition, business development, advertising, marketing programs, and employee compensation and contractor costs to support these programs. Sales and marketing expenses increased by $207 million, or 26%, in 2014 compared to 2013. Sales and marketing expenses

increased by $129 million, or 19%, in 2013 compared to 2012. The increase in sales and marketing expenses in 2014 and 2013 was due primarily to higher spend to support our strategic initiatives. In 2014, we redesigned our PayPal logo and made significant investments in campaigns designed to enhance our global brand recognition and drive consumer engagement.

Product development expenses consist primarily of employee compensation and contractor costs that are incurred in connection with the development of our Payments Platform, new products and the improvement of our existing products. Product development expenses exclude software and website development costs that are capitalized. The amortization of developed technology is included in depreciation and amortization expenses.

Product development expenses increased by $163 million, or 22%, in 2014 compared to 2013 and by $50 million, or 7%, in 2013 compared to 2012. The increase was due primarily to investments in our Payments Platform, creating new mobile experiences for our customers and supporting our strategic initiatives. The acquisition of Braintree also impacted the growth in product development expenses in 2014 compared to 2013.

General and administrative expenses consist primarily of costs incurred to provide support to our business, including legal, human resources, finance, executive and other support operations. Our legal expenses, including those related to various ongoing legal proceedings, may fluctuate substantially from period to period.

These combined financial statements include expenses associated with workplace resources and information technology that were previously allocated to the Payments segment of eBay, and, additional expenses related to certain corporate functions, including senior management, legal, human resources and finance. These expenses also include allocations related to share based compensation. The expenses that were incurred by eBay have been allocated to us based on direct usage or benefits where identifiable, with the remainder allocated on a pro rata basis of revenue, headcount, or other systematic measure. The corporate costs and allocation of expenses from eBay may not be indicative of the expenses that may have been incurred had we been a separate stand-alone entity during the periods presented, nor are the results stated herein indicative of the expenses we may incur in the future. Such expenses could be higher or lower. In the periods presented, a significant portion of expenses associated with these functions and allocated to us in our combined financial statements are included in general and administrative expenses.

General and administrative expenses increased $104 million, or 28%, in 2014 compared to 2013 and $33 million, or 10%, in 2013 compared to 2012. In 2014, $207 million of corporate costs and expenses allocated to us were included in general and administrative expenses representing an increase of $24 million, or 13% compared to 2013. In 2013, $183 million of corporate costs and expenses allocated to us were included in general and administrative expenses representing an increase of $15 million, or 9% compared to 2012. In 2014 and 2013, the remaining increase in general and administrative expenses related primarily to higher employee-related costs, including those related to the separation.

The primary components of our depreciation and amortization expenses include the depreciation of software, including our technology platform, equipment used to deliver our services and the amortization of acquired intangible assets. Depreciation and amortization expenses increased $63 million, or 14%, in 2014 compared to 2013 and $71 million, or 19%, in 2013 compared to 2012. The increases in 2014 and 2013 were predominantly due to additional depreciation expenses associated with investments in our technology platform. Amortization expenses for intangible assets were $84 million, $70 million and $67 million for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012 respectively. The increase in amortization expenses for intangible assets in 2014 were due primarily to our acquisition of Braintree in the fourth quarter of 2013.

Our effective tax rate was 67% in 2014 compared to 12% in 2013. The increase in our effective tax rate during 2014 compared to 2013 was due primarily to the recognition during the year of a U.S. deferred tax liability of approximately $650 million on $1.9 billion of undistributed foreign earnings of certain of our foreign subsidiaries for 2013 and prior years. See “Note 13—Income Taxes” to the combined financial statements included in this report for more information on our effective tax rate.

Our effective tax rate was 12% in 2013 compared to 13% in 2012. The decrease in our effective tax rate during 2013 was due primarily to re-enactment of the federal research and development credit retroactive to January 1, 2012 during the first quarter of 2013.

The significant components of our net revenue for the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014:

The increase in transaction revenues in the three months ended March 31, 2015 compared to the same period of the prior year was primarily based on the growth in TPV and the total number of payment transactions on our Payments Platform.

The following table provides a summary of our active customer accounts, number of payment transactions and TPV:

The growth in TPV was driven largely by the increase in the number of payment transactions in the three months ended March 31, 2015 compared to the same period of the prior year. The growth in transaction revenues was lower than the growth in TPV and growth in payment transactions due to a higher portion of TPV generated by large merchants who generally pay lower rates on higher transaction volume. The impact of increases or decreases in prices charged to our customers did not significantly impact revenue growth in the three months ended March 31, 2015.

Net revenues from other value added services increased by 12% in the three months ended March 31, 2015 compared to the same period of the prior year. The increase was primarily due to interest and fee income earned on loans receivable outstanding from consumers that used our PayPal Credit products as a funding source. The total consumer loans receivable balance as of March 31, 2015 was $3.6 billion, reflecting a year over year increase of 27%. Net revenues from other value added services that we provide did not change significantly in the three months ended March 31, 2015 compared to the same period of the prior year.

The following table summarizes our operating expenses and related metrics we use to assess the trend in each:

The increase of $61 million, or 12%, in transaction expense in the three months ended March 31, 2015 compared to the same period of the prior year was predominantly attributable to an increase in TPV, which was offset by favorable foreign currency fluctuations due to the strengthening of the U.S. dollar. Our transaction expense rates in the three months ended March 31, 2015 improved compared to the same period of the prior year due primarily to cost efficiencies from our global payments platform and a favorable funding mix. The cost of funding a transaction with a credit card is generally more costly than the cost of funding a transaction from a bank or through internal sources such as PayPal account balance or PayPal Credit. As we expand the availability of alternative funding sources to our customers, a change in funding mix can increase or decrease our transaction expense rate. Funding mix was favorably impacted during the three months ended March 31, 2015 by a higher percentage of TPV from lower-cost funding sources. For the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014, approximately 2% of TPV was funded with PayPal Credit. For the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014, approximately 46% and 48% of TPV, respectively, was generated outside of the U.S. Interest expense on borrowings incurred to finance our portfolio of loans receivable, included in transaction expense, was $3 million and $1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively.

The increase of $49 million, or 38%, in transaction and loan losses in the three months ended March 31, 2015 compared to the same period of the prior year was predominantly attributable to higher TPV and an increase in loan losses. Loan losses relating to our loans receivable portfolio were $71 million and $49 million in the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively, reflecting an increase of 45%. The increase in loan losses was due to growth in the portfolio of loans receivable outstanding arising from consumers who chose PayPal Credit as a funding option, which increased by 27% year over year, and an increase in losses incurred on working

capital advances to selected merchant sellers. The total consumer loans receivable balance as of March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014 was $3.6 billion. The following table provides information regarding the credit quality of our pool of consumer loans and interest receivable balance:

Modifications to our PayPal Credit products acceptable risk parameters during those periods did not have a material impact on our loan losses.

Recoveries associated with transaction losses incurred on eligible eBay purchases during the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014 were $10 million and $12 million, respectively.

Customer support and operations costs increased by $20 million, or 8%, in the three months ended March 31, 2015 compared to the same period of the prior year. The increase was predominantly related to an increase in headcount to service the growth in our active customer accounts and the number of payment transactions occurring on our Payments Platform, which was offset in part by favorable foreign currency fluctuations due to the strengthening of the U.S. dollar.

Sales and marketing expenses increased by $21 million, or 10%, in the three months ended March 31, 2015 compared to the same period of the prior year. The increase in sales and marketing expenses was due primarily to an increase in expenses relating to marketing programs to promote our products and higher employee-related costs, which was offset in part by favorable foreign currency fluctuations due to the strengthening of the U.S. dollar.

Product development expenses increased by $26 million, or 13%, in the three months ended March 31, 2015 compared to the same period of the prior year. The increase was due primarily to investments in our Payments Platform, creating new mobile experiences for our customers and supporting our strategic initiatives.

General and administrative expenses increased $23 million, or 20%, in the three months ended March 31, 2015 compared to the same period of the prior year. In the three months ended March 31, 2015, $61 million of corporate costs and expenses allocated to us were included in general and administrative expenses representing an increase of $1 million, or 2%, compared to the same period of the prior year. The increase in general and administrative expenses related primarily to an increase in expenses associated with regulatory matters and higher employee-related costs, including those related to our separation.

Depreciation and amortization expenses increased $11 million, or 8%, in the three months ended March 31, 2015 compared to the same period of the prior year. The increases were predominantly due to additional depreciation expenses associated with investments in our technology platforms. Amortization expenses for intangible assets were $19 million and $24 million during the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively.

In January 2015, at a regular meeting of eBay’s Board of Directors (“eBay’s Board”), eBay’s Board approved a plan to implement a strategic reduction of its existing global workforce. The reduction is expected to be substantially completed in the first half of 2015 and generate annual savings of more than $130 million across the Company, primarily impacting sales and marketing and product development expenses. The savings in these line items are expected to be offset by the Company’s reinvestment back into these areas of the business to drive additional growth. Restructuring expenses were $48 million in the three months ended March 31, 2015. No restructuring expenses were recognized in the three months ended March 31, 2014.

Our effective income tax rate was 21% and 222% for the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively. The decrease in our effective income tax rate for the three months ended March 31, 2015 compared to the same period of the prior year was due primarily to the prior year accrual of U.S. income and applicable foreign taxes on $1.9 billion of undistributed foreign earnings for 2013 and prior years which were no longer considered indefinitely reinvested. Without this accrual, our effective tax rate for the three months ended March 31, 2014 would have been 14%. The additional 7% increase in our effective tax rate over the same period of the prior year was due primarily to discrete items.

Non-GAAP financial information is defined as a numerical measure of a company’s performance that excludes or includes amounts so as to be different than the most comparable measure calculated and presented in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”). Pursuant to the requirements of Regulation S-K, portions of this “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” include a reconciliation of certain non-GAAP financial measures to the most directly comparable GAAP financial measures. The presentation of non-GAAP financial measures should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for the Company’s related financial results prepared in accordance with GAAP.

We present non-GAAP financial measures to enhance an investor’s evaluation of our ongoing operating results and to facilitate meaningful comparison of our results between periods. Management uses these non-GAAP financial measures to, among other things, evaluate our ongoing operations, for internal planning and forecasting purposes and in the calculation of performance-based compensation.

We exclude the following items from non-GAAP net income, non-GAAP earnings per diluted share, non-GAAP operating income, non-GAAP operating margin and non-GAAP effective tax rate:

In addition to the non-GAAP measures discussed above, the company also uses free cash flow to assess our operating performance. Free cash flow represents operating cash flows less purchases of property and equipment. The company considers free cash flow to be a liquidity measure that provides useful information to management and investors about the amount of cash generated by the business after the purchases of property, buildings, equipment and including investments in our Payments Platform, which can then be used to, among other things, invest in the company’s business, make strategic acquisitions, and repurchase stock. A limitation of the utility of free cash flow as a measure of financial performance is that it does not represent the total increase or decrease in the company’s cash balance for the period.

We require liquidity and access to capital to fund our global operations, customer protection programs, provide credit to customers that fund transactions using our PayPal Credit product, capital expenditures, investments in our business, potential acquisitions and current and future obligations. The following table summarizes the cash, cash equivalents and available-for-sale investment balances available as of December 31, 2014:

Cash, cash equivalents and available-for-sale investments held by our foreign subsidiaries (i.e., any entities where earnings would be subject to United States tax upon repatriation) were $2.0 billion and $1.8 billion at December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively, or 90% and 91% of our total cash, cash equivalents and available-for-sale investments as of such dates. During the first quarter of 2014, eBay changed its capital allocation strategy to reflect its objective of increasing its available U.S. cash, preserving its credit rating, and providing greater liquidity to meet its other cash needs in the U.S., which included, among other things and subject to market conditions and other uncertainties, merger and acquisition activity and potentially funding opportunistic share repurchases on an accelerated basis. As a result of the change in eBay’s capital allocation strategy, we provided for U.S. income and applicable foreign withholding taxes on $1.9 billion of undistributed foreign earnings of certain of our non-U.S. subsidiaries for 2013 and prior years. We have recorded a deferred tax liability of approximately $650 million based on the estimated tax consequences of repatriating these earnings. We have not provided for U.S. federal income and foreign withholding taxes on $2.3 billion of our non-U.S. subsidiaries’ undistributed earnings as of December 31, 2014. Since we do not know the time or manner in which we would repatriate those funds, we cannot determine the impact of local taxes, withholding taxes and foreign tax credits associated with the future repatriation of such earnings and therefore cannot quantify the tax liability. We expect to receive a contribution of approximately $3.8 billion of cash from eBay prior to the separation. This cash will be used for general corporate purposes in both our international and domestic operations.

We strive to protect consumers and merchants from fraudulent transactions. The risk of losses from these protection programs are specific to individual customers, merchants and transactions, and may also be impacted by regional variations to these programs and modifications to the program resulting from changes to regulatory requirements. For the periods presented in the combined financial statements, payments under these protections have ranged between 0.08% and 0.12% of TPV. Historical trends may not be an indication of the future. In addition, we recovered certain amounts from eBay related to our customer protection programs offered on eligible eBay purchases made with PayPal. These costs include the transaction losses associated with customer claims and are included as a reduction of transaction and loan losses. Changes in our arrangement with eBay could impact our transaction and loan losses.

We currently fund the expansion of the PayPal Credit loans receivables with international and domestic cash resources and borrowings from eBay. To the extent that our PayPal Credit products become more widely available, and as we further promote PayPal Credit, customer adoption and usage of such products may expand. Any resulting growth in the portfolio of loan receivables would increase our liquidity needs and any failure to meet those liquidity needs could adversely affect our business. In April 2015, we concluded an arrangement with certain investors under which we sold a participation interest of approximately $700 million in a portion of our purchased consumer receivables arising from loans made by our partner chartered financial institution of individual consumers to purchase goods and services using our PayPal Credit products. We expect to continue to evaluate third party sources of funding of our credit portfolio, including, but not limited to, commercial banks, securitization markets, private equity firms and sovereign wealth funds. Through these arrangements we are able to continue to expand the availability of our credit products without requiring the use of internal capital. We believe these third party sources, together with cash expected to be generated from operations, will be sufficient to fund the PayPal Credit portfolio for the foreseeable future.

Our liquidity and access to capital could be impacted by our credit rating, financial performance, and global credit market conditions. We are working with credit rating agencies to obtain separate credit ratings and believe that immediately following separation we will be rated investment grade. In addition, our liquidity and access to capital could also be negatively impacted by the outcome of any of the legal or regulatory proceedings to which we are a party. See “Risk Factors—Risk Factors That May Affect Our Business, Results of Operations and Financial Condition” and “Note 10—Commitments and Contingencies” to the combined financial statements for additional discussion of these and other risks facing our business.

of the consumer loan receivables portfolio at the time of the purchase (expected to be the fourth quarter of 2016), subject to certain adjustments and exclusions. As of December 31, 2014, Synchrony had a net receivables portfolio under the credit program agreement of approximately $1.5 billion.

We believe that our existing cash, cash equivalents, available-for-sale investments, cash expected to be generated from operations, the anticipated cash contribution to PayPal from eBay, our expected access to capital markets, together with funding through third party sources, such as commercial banks, private equity firms, and sovereign wealth funds, will be sufficient to fund our operating activities, anticipated capital expenditures, and PayPal Credit portfolio for the foreseeable future.

We held cash, cash equivalents and available-for-sale investment balances of $2.4 billion as of March 31, 2015. Cash, cash equivalents and available-for-sale investments held by our foreign subsidiaries (i.e., any entities where earnings would be subject to United States tax upon repatriation) were $2.3 billion as of March 31, 2015, or 96% of our total cash, cash equivalents and available-for-sale investments.

We generated cash from operating activities of $2.2 billion, $2.0 billion and $1.6 billion in 2014, 2013 and 2012, due primarily to operating income of $1.3 billion, $1.1 billion, and $880 million, respectively. We also recorded non-cash charges in operating income related to transaction and loan losses, depreciation and amortization, and stock-based compensation that contributed to net cash provided by operating activities.

Cash paid for income taxes in 2014, 2013 and 2012 was $47 million, $28 million and $38 million, respectively.

The net cash used in investing activities of $1.5 billion in 2014 was due primarily to increases in our loan receivable portfolio (net of collections) originated through our PayPal Credit products of $1.0 billion and purchases of property and equipment of $492 million.

The net cash used in investing activities of $1.7 billion in 2013 was due primarily to increases in our loan receivable portfolio (net of collections) originated through our PayPal Credit products of $793 million, cash paid for acquisitions (net of cash acquired) of $731 million, and net cash paid for purchases and sales of investments of $290 million.

The net cash used in investing activities of $1.5 billion in 2012 was due primarily to increases in our loan receivable portfolio (net of collections and charge-offs) originated through our PayPal Credit products of $740 million, purchases of property and equipment, of $511 million and net cash outflows relating to receivables from eBay of $168 million.

The net cash used in financing activities of $51 million in 2014, $85 million in 2013 and $210 million in 2012 was due primarily to net cash outflows relating to repayments of borrowings from eBay.

Management uses a free cash flow measure to evaluate the company’s operating results, evaluate strategic investments and assess the company’s ability and need to incur and service debt. Free cash flow is not a defined term under GAAP and it should not be inferred that the entire free cash flow amount is available for discretionary expenditures. The company defines free cash flow as net cash provided by operating activities less purchases of property and equipment, including the investment in software. Free cash flow was $1.7 billion in 2014, an increase of $126 million from 2013. The increase was primarily due to an increase in deferred income taxes of $628 million, partially offset by a decrease in net income. Free cash flow was $1.6 billion in 2013, an increase of $548 million from 2012. The increase in 2013 was due primarily to an increase in net income of $177 million, an increase in the accrual for transaction and loan losses of $137 million and a decrease of $120 million in purchases of property and equipment. The increase in free cash flow in 2014 was used to fund our increase in loans to consumers and merchants. The increase in free cash flow in 2013 was used towards the acquisition of Braintree in December of 2013.

The negative effect of currency exchange rates on cash and cash equivalents during 2014 of $26 million was due to the strengthening of the U.S. dollar against certain foreign currencies, primarily the Euro. There was minimal impact of currency exchange rates on cash and cash equivalents during 2013 and 2012.

We generated cash from operating activities of $544 million in the three months ended March 31, 2015 due primarily to operating income of $322 million. Adjustments for non-cash charges in operating income increased during the period ended March 31, 2015 compared to the same period of the prior year and included $178 million related to transaction and loan losses, $141 million related to depreciation and amortization and $79 million related to stock-based compensation. These adjustments were offset by an increase in working capital of $150 million.

We generated cash from operating activities of $425 million in the three months ended March 31, 2014 due primarily to operating income of $318 million, adjusted for non-cash charges in operating income related to $129 million in transaction and loan losses, $130 million in depreciation and amortization, and $68 million in stock-based compensation, offset by an increase in working capital of $160 million.

Cash paid for income taxes in the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014 was $5 million and $11 million, respectively.

The net cash used in investing activities of $254 million in the three months ended March 31, 2015 was due primarily to purchases of property and equipment of $194 million and net cash outflows relating to receivables from eBay of $56 million. Purchases of property and equipment increased in the current period due in part to the anticipated separation from eBay.

The net cash provided by investing activities of $176 million in the three months ended March 31, 2014 was due primarily to maturities and sales of investments of $367 million, offset by purchases of property and equipment of $100 million and net cash outflows relating to receivables from eBay of $64 million.

The net cash used in financing activities of $94 million and $6 million in the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively, was due primarily to net cash outflows relating to repayments of borrowings from eBay.

Free cash flow was $350 million in the three months ended March 31, 2015, an increase of $25 million from the same period of the prior year. The increase was primarily due to an increase in cash generated from operating activities offset by an increase in purchases of property and equipment. Free cash flow generated during the three months ended March 31, 2015 was used for general business purposes and towards our acquisitions announced in March 2015.

The negative effect of currency exchange rates on cash and cash equivalents during the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014 of $32 million and $1 million, respectively, was due to the strengthening of the U.S. dollar against certain foreign currencies, primarily the Euro.

PayPal has no off-balance sheet debt, other than lease arrangements and other commitments as presented in the Future Obligations table that follows.

eBay Inc. has a cash pooling arrangement with a financial institution for cash management purposes. We participate in this arrangement, which allows for cash withdrawals from this financial institution based upon eBay’s aggregate operating cash balances within the same financial institution (“Aggregate Cash Deposits”). This arrangement also allows eBay to withdraw amounts exceeding the Aggregate Cash Deposits up to an agreed-upon limit. The net balance of the withdrawals and the Aggregate Cash Deposits are used by the financial institution as a basis for calculating eBay’s net interest expense or income. As of December 31, 2014, PayPal had $1.6 billion relating to cash subject to this pooling arrangement.

Following the separation, our capital structure and sources of liquidity will differ from our historical capital structure. Please refer to the “Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined Financial Statements” included elsewhere in this information statement for discussion of the anticipated post-distribution capital structuring, including an anticipated cash contribution to PayPal from eBay. Post separation, we will no longer participate in cash management and intercompany funding arrangements with eBay. Our ability to fund our capital needs will depend on our ability to access our cash and investment portfolio, generate cash from operations, and access capital markets. The following table summarizes our obligations as of December 31, 2014 that are expected to impact liquidity and cash flow in future periods. We believe we will be able to fund these obligations through our existing cash and investment portfolio and cash expected to be generated from operations.

The significant assumptions used in our determination of amounts presented in the above table are as follows:

In addition, in June 2014, we agreed, subject to certain conditions, that we, one of our affiliates or a third party partner will purchase a portfolio of consumer loan receivables relating to the customer accounts arising out of our current credit program agreement with Synchrony (formerly GE Capital Retail Bank) for a price based on the book value of the consumer loan receivables portfolio at the time of the purchase (expected to be the fourth quarter of 2016), subject to certain adjustments and exclusions. As of December 31, 2014, Synchrony had a net receivables portfolio under the credit program agreement of approximately $1.5 billion.

As we are unable to reasonably predict the timing of settlement of liabilities related to unrecognized tax benefits, net, the table does not include $187 million of such non-current liabilities included in deferred and other tax liabilities recorded on our combined balance sheet as of December 31, 2014.

The Company does not experience meaningful seasonality. No individual quarter in 2014, 2013 or 2012 accounted for more than 30% of net revenue.

The application of U.S. GAAP requires us to make estimates and assumptions about certain items and future events that directly affect our reported financial condition. We have established detailed policies and control procedures to

provide reasonable assurance that the methods used to make estimates and assumptions are well controlled and are applied consistently from period to period. The accounting estimates and assumptions discussed in this section are those that we consider to be the most critical to our financial statements. An accounting estimate is considered critical if both (a) the nature of the estimate or assumption is material due to the levels of subjectivity and judgment involved, and (b) the impact within a reasonable range of outcomes of the estimate and assumption is material to our financial condition. Senior management has discussed the development, selection and disclosure of these estimates with the Audit Committee of eBay Inc.’s board of directors. Our significant accounting policies, including recent accounting pronouncements, are described in “Note 1—Overview and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” to the combined annual financial statements.

A quantitative sensitivity analysis is provided where that information is reasonably available, can be reliably estimated and provides material information to investors. The amounts used to assess sensitivity are included to allow users of this information statement to understand a general direction cause and effect of changes in the estimates and do not represent management’s predictions of variability. For all of these estimates, it should be noted that future events rarely develop exactly as forecasted, and estimates require regular review and adjustment.

Transaction and loan losses include the expense associated with our customer protection programs, fraud, chargebacks, and credit losses associated with our loans receivable balances. We expect our transaction and loan losses to fluctuate depending on many factors, including, the total TPV, macroeconomic conditions, the extent of our customer protection programs, the impact of regulatory changes, and the credit quality of loans receivable arising from transactions funded with our PayPal Credit products.

We establish allowances for estimated transaction losses arising from processing customer transactions, such as chargebacks for unauthorized credit card use and merchant-related chargebacks due to non-delivery of goods or services, ACH returns, buyer protection program claims, account take overs, and debit card overdrafts. Additions to the allowance, in the form of provisions, are reflected in transaction and loan losses in our combined statements of income. The allowances, which involve the use of actuarial techniques, are monitored monthly and are updated based on actual claims data reported by our claims processors and other actual data received. The allowances are based on known facts and circumstances, internal factors including experience with similar cases, historical trends involving loss payment patterns, and the mix of transaction and loss types.

We also establish an allowance for loans receivable which represents our estimate of probable loan losses inherent in our PayPal Credit loans receivable portfolio and is reflected in transaction and loan losses in our combined statements of income. This evaluation process is subject to numerous estimates and judgments, and is primarily based on forecasted principal balance delinquency rates (“roll rates”). Roll rates are the percentage of balances which we estimate will migrate from one stage of delinquency to the next based on our historical experience, as well as external factors such as estimated bankruptcies and levels of unemployment. Roll rates are applied to principal balances for each stage of delinquency, from current to 180 days past due, in order to estimate the principal loans which are probable to be charged off. The allowance for loss against interest receivable is primarily determined by applying historical average customer account roll rates to the interest receivable balance in each stage of delinquency to project how much will not be collectible.

We charge off loans receivable balances in the month in which the customer balance becomes 180 days past due. Bankrupt accounts are charged off within 60 days of receiving notification from the bankruptcy courts. Past due loans receivable continue to accrue interest until such time as they are charged off, with the portion of the reserve related to interest receivable balance classified as a reduction of revenue.

Determining appropriate allowances for these losses is an inherently uncertain process and is subject to numerous estimates and judgments, and ultimate losses may vary from the current estimates. We regularly update our

allowance estimates as new facts become known and events occur that may impact the settlement or recovery of losses. The allowances are maintained at a level we deem appropriate to adequately provide for losses incurred at the balance sheet date. An aggregate ten percentage point increase in our transaction and loan loss rate would negatively impact transaction and loan losses by approximately $65 million.

Our annual tax rate is based on our income, statutory tax rates and tax planning opportunities available to us in the various jurisdictions in which we operate. Tax laws are complex and subject to different interpretations by the taxpayer and respective government taxing authorities. Significant judgment is required in determining our tax expense and in evaluating our tax positions, including evaluating uncertainties. We review our tax positions quarterly and adjust the balances as new information becomes available. Our income tax rate is significantly affected by the tax rates that apply to our foreign earnings. In addition to local country tax laws and regulations, our income tax rate depends on the extent that our earnings are indefinitely reinvested outside the U.S. Indefinite reinvestment is determined by management’s judgment about and intentions concerning our future operations. To the extent we do not intend to repatriate these earnings to fund U.S. operations, we do not provide for U.S. federal income and foreign withholding tax on these earnings.

Deferred tax assets represent amounts available to reduce income taxes payable on taxable income in future years. Such assets arise because of temporary differences between the financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities, as well as from net operating loss and tax credit carryforwards. We evaluate the recoverability of these future tax deductions and credits by assessing the adequacy of future expected taxable income from all sources, including reversal of taxable temporary differences, forecasted operating earnings and available tax planning strategies. These sources of income rely heavily on estimates that are based on a number of factors, including our historical experience and short range and long-range business forecasts. To the extent deferred tax assets are not expected to be realized, we record a valuation allowance.

We recognize and measure uncertain tax positions in accordance with GAAP, pursuant to which we only recognize the tax benefit from an uncertain tax position if it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained on examination by the taxing authorities, based on the technical merits of the position. The tax benefits recognized in the financial statements from such positions are then measured based on the largest benefit that has a greater than 50 percent likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement. We report a liability for unrecognized tax benefits resulting from uncertain tax positions taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. GAAP further requires that a change in judgment related to the expected ultimate resolution of uncertain tax positions be recognized in earnings in the quarter in which such change occurs. We recognize interest and penalties, if any, related to unrecognized tax benefits in income tax expense.

We file annual income tax returns in multiple taxing jurisdictions around the world. A number of years may elapse before an uncertain tax position is audited by the relevant tax authorities and finally resolved. While it is often difficult to predict the final outcome or the timing of resolution of any particular uncertain tax position, we believe that our reserves for income taxes are adequate such that we reflect the benefits more likely than not to be sustained in an examination. We adjust these reserves, as well as the related interest, where appropriate in light of changing facts and circumstances. Settlement of any particular position could require the use of cash.

Based on our results for the year ended December 31, 2014, a one-percentage point change in our provision for income taxes as a percentage of income before taxes would have resulted in an increase or decrease in the provision of approximately $13 million.

We are currently involved in various claims, legal proceedings and investigations of potential operating violations by regulatory oversight authorities. We regularly review the status of each significant matter and

assess our potential financial exposure. If the potential loss from any claim, legal proceeding or potential regulatory violation is considered probable and the amount can be reasonably estimated, we accrue a liability for the estimated loss. Significant judgment is required in both the determination of probability and the determination of whether an exposure is reasonably estimable. Our judgments are subjective based on the status of the legal or regulatory proceedings, the merits of our defenses and consultation with in-house and outside legal counsel. Because of uncertainties related to these matters, accruals are based only on the best information available at the time. As additional information becomes available, we reassess the potential liability related to pending claims, litigation or other violation and may revise our estimates. Due to the inherent uncertainties of the legal and regulatory process in the multiple jurisdictions in which we operate, our judgments may be materially different than the actual outcomes.

Application of the various accounting principles in U.S. GAAP related to the measurement and recognition of revenue requires us to make judgments and estimates. Complex arrangements with nonstandard terms and conditions may require significant contract interpretation to determine the appropriate accounting. Specifically, the determination of whether we are a principal to a transaction (gross revenue) or an agent (net revenue) can require considerable judgment. Further, we provide incentive payments to consumers and merchants, which require judgment to determine whether the payments should be recorded as a reduction to gross revenue. Changes in judgments with respect to these assumptions and estimates could impact the amount of revenue recognized.

The valuation of assets acquired in a business combination and asset impairment reviews require the use of significant estimates and assumptions. The acquisition method of accounting for business combinations requires us to estimate the fair value of assets acquired, liabilities assumed, and any non-controlling interest in the acquiree to properly allocate purchase price consideration between assets that are depreciated and amortized from goodwill. Impairment testing for assets, other than goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets, requires the allocation of cash flows to those assets or group of assets and if required, an estimate of fair value for the assets or group of assets. Our estimates are based upon assumptions believed to be reasonable, but which are inherently uncertain and unpredictable. These valuations require the use of management’s assumptions, which would not reflect unanticipated events and circumstances that may occur.

We evaluate goodwill and intangible assets for impairment on an annual basis or sooner if indicators of impairment exist. In the fourth quarter of 2012, the Company early adopted the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) guidance that simplifies how an entity tests indefinite-lived intangible assets for impairment, allowing a qualitative assessment to be performed, which is similar to the FASB guidance for evaluating goodwill for impairment. In performing these qualitative assessments, we consider relevant events and conditions, including but not limited to, macroeconomic trends, industry and market conditions, overall financial performance, cost factors, company-specific events, legal and regulatory factors and our market capitalization (previously assessed under eBay). If the qualitative assessments indicate that it is more likely than not that the fair value of the reporting unit or indefinite-lived intangible assets are less than their carrying amounts, we must perform a quantitative impairment test.

Under the quantitative impairment test, if the carrying amount of the reporting unit goodwill exceeds the implied fair value of that goodwill, an impairment loss is recorded in the Combined Statements of Income. Measurement of the fair value of a reporting unit is based on one or more of the following fair value measures: amounts at which the unit as a whole could be bought or sold in a current transaction between willing parties, using present value techniques of estimated future cash flows, or using valuation techniques based on multiples of earnings or revenue, or a similar performance measure.

Market risk is the potential for economic losses to be incurred on market risk sensitive instruments arising from adverse changes in market factors such as interest rates, foreign currency exchange rates and equity price risk. Management establishes and oversees the implementation of policies governing our investing, funding, and foreign currency derivative activities in order to mitigate market risks. We monitor risk exposures on an ongoing basis.

We are exposed to interest rate risk from our investment portfolio and from interest-rate sensitive assets underlying the customer balances we hold on our combined balance sheet as customer accounts.

As of December 31, 2014, approximately 97% of our total cash and investment portfolio was held in cash and cash equivalents, and we held no direct investments in auction rate securities, collateralized debt obligations, structured investment vehicles or mortgage-backed securities. For additional details related to our investment activities, please see “Note 4—Investments” to the combined financial statements included in this report.

The assets underlying the customer balances we hold on our combined balance sheet as customer accounts are maintained in interest and non-interest bearing bank deposits, time deposits, and U.S. and foreign government and agency securities. We classify the assets underlying the customer balances as current based on their purpose and availability to fulfill our direct obligation under amounts due to customers. We seek to preserve principal while holding eligible liquid assets, as defined by the regulatory requirements and commercial law in the jurisdictions where PayPal operates, equal to at least 100% of the aggregate amount of all customer balances. We do not pay interest on amounts due to customers.

We expect to enter into a new revolving credit facility that will bear interest at a floating rate. As a result, we will be exposed to fluctuations in interest rates to the extent of our borrowings under the revolving credit facility.

Interest rates may also adversely impact our customers’ spending levels and ability and willingness to pay outstanding amounts owed to us. Higher interest rates often lead to higher payment obligations by customers to us and other lenders under mortgage, credit card and other consumer loans, which may reduce our customers’ ability to remain current on their obligations to us and therefore lead to increased delinquencies, charge-offs and allowance for loan and interest receivable which could have an adverse effect on our net earnings.

A 100 basis point adverse change in interest rates would not have a material impact on the Company’s financial assets or liabilities at December 31, 2014 and 2013.

We have significant operations internationally that are denominated in foreign currencies, primarily the Euro, British Pound, and Australian Dollar, subjecting us to foreign currency risk which may adversely impact our financial results. We transact business in various foreign currencies and have significant international revenues as well as costs. In addition, we charge our international subsidiaries for their use of intellectual property and technology and for certain corporate services. Our cash flow, results of operations and certain of our intercompany balances that are exposed to foreign exchange rate fluctuations may differ materially from expectations and we may record significant gains or losses due to foreign currency fluctuations and related hedging activities. We are generally a net receiver of foreign currencies and therefore benefit from a weakening of the U.S. dollar and are adversely affected by a strengthening of the U.S. dollar relative to foreign currencies.

We have a foreign exchange exposure management program designed to identify material foreign currency exposures, manage these exposures and reduce the potential effects of currency fluctuations on our reported combined cash flows and results of operations through the execution of foreign currency exchange contracts.

These foreign currency exchange contracts are accounted for as derivative instruments; for additional details related to our foreign currency exchange contracts, please see “Note 6—Derivative Instruments” to the combined financial statements included in this report.

We use foreign exchange forward contracts to protect our forecasted U.S. dollar-equivalent earnings from adverse changes in foreign currency exchange rates. These hedging contracts reduce, but do not entirely eliminate, the impact of adverse currency exchange rate movements. We designate these contracts as cash flow hedges for accounting purposes. The effective portion of the derivative’s gain or loss is initially reported as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income (AOCI) and subsequently reclassified into revenue in the same period the forecasted transaction affects earnings. The ineffective portion of the unrealized gains and losses on these contracts, if any, is recorded immediately in earnings.

We considered the historical trends in currency exchange rates and determined that it was reasonably possible that changes in exchange rates of 20% for all currencies could be experienced in the near term. If the U.S. dollar weakened by 20% at March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, the amount recorded in AOCI related to our foreign exchange forward contracts before tax effect would have been approximately $269 million and $294 million lower, respectively. If the U.S. dollar strengthened by 20% at March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, the amount recorded in AOCI related to our foreign exchange forward contracts before tax effect would have been approximately $269 million and $294 million higher, respectively.

In addition, we use foreign exchange contracts to offset the foreign exchange risk on our assets and liabilities denominated in currencies other than the functional currency of our subsidiaries. These contracts reduce, but do not entirely eliminate, the impact of currency exchange rate movements on our assets and liabilities. The foreign currency gains and losses on the assets and liabilities are recorded in “Other income (expense), net,” which are offset by the gains and losses on the foreign exchange contracts.

We considered the historical trends in currency exchange rates and determined that it was reasonably possible that adverse changes in exchange rates of 20% for all currencies could be experienced in the near term. These changes would have resulted in an adverse impact on income before income taxes of approximately $20 million and $32 million at March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively, without considering the offsetting effect of hedging. Foreign exchange contracts in place as of March 31, 2015 would have resulted in an offsetting effect of approximately $26 million, resulting in a net positive impact of approximately $6 million. Foreign exchange contracts in place as of December 31, 2014 would have resulted in an offsetting effect of approximately $34 million, resulting in a net positive impact of approximately $2 million. These reasonably possible adverse changes in exchange rates of 20% were applied to total monetary assets and liabilities denominated in currencies other than the functional currencies of our subsidiaries at the balance sheet dates to compute the adverse impact these changes would have had on our income before income taxes in the near term.

As of December 31, 2014, our cost and equity method investments totaled $31 million, which represented approximately 1% of our total cash and investment portfolio and were primarily related to equity method investments in privately held companies. We did not hold any marketable equity instruments. We review our investments for impairment when events and circumstances indicate a decline in fair value of such assets below carrying value is other-than-temporary. Our analysis includes a review of recent operating results and trends, recent sales/acquisitions of the securities in which we have invested and other publicly available data.

We actively monitor our exposure to the European markets, including the impact of sovereign debt issues associated with Cyprus, Greece, Ireland, Italy, Portugal and Spain. As of December 31, 2014, we did not have any direct investments in the sovereign debt of these countries or in debt securities issued by corporations or financial institutions organized in these countries.

The following table sets forth information as of June 26, 2015 regarding the individuals who are expected to serve as executive officers of PayPal following the distribution. While some of PayPal’s executive officers are currently officers and employees of eBay, after the distribution, none of these individuals will be employees or executive officers of eBay.

Daniel H. Schulman is expected to serve as the President and Chief Executive Officer of PayPal. He has served as the President and CEO-Designee of PayPal since September 2014. From August 2010 to August 2014, Mr. Schulman served as Group President, Enterprise Group of American Express. Mr. Schulman was President, Prepaid Group of Sprint Nextel Corporation, a cellular phone service provider, from November 2009 until August 2010, when Sprint Nextel acquired Virgin Mobile, USA, a cellular phone service provider.

Jonathan Auerbach is expected to serve as Senior Vice President, Chief Strategy and Growth Officer of PayPal. Mr. Auerbach was previously the CEO of Group Digital Life at Singapore Telecommunications Limited (Singtel) from September 2014 to May 2015, where he led the company’s global portfolio of digital businesses as well as its venture fund. From 1987 through 2014, Mr. Auerbach was a management consultant with McKinsey & Company. At McKinsey, he held a variety of executive roles in Asia and North America during his tenure with the Firm, including leading the Asian Telecommunications, Media and Technology Practice; the Singapore Office and the Southeast Asia Region; and the North American High Tech Practice.

Tomer Barel is expected to serve as the Senior Vice President, Chief Risk Officer of PayPal. He has served as the Chief Risk Officer of PayPal since November 2013. From April 2012 to November 2013, Mr. Barel was Vice President, Risk Management for PayPal. Mr. Barel previously served as the General Manager for PayPal Israel from June 2009 through February 2013, and as Senior Director, Advanced Risk Sciences, from June 2009 to March 2012.

James J. Barrese is expected to serve as the Chief Technology Officer and Senior Vice President, Payment Services of PayPal. Prior to the separation, Mr. Barrese was the Senior Vice President and Chief Technology Officer at PayPal from October 2013. Mr. Barrese was PayPal’s Chief Technology Officer from February 2012 through October 2013, and was the Vice President of Global Product Development for PayPal from August 2011 through February 2012. Prior to that time, Mr. Barrese served in various leadership roles in the technology organization at eBay, Inc. since he began employment with the company in 2001.

Patrick L. A. Dupuis is expected to serve as the Senior Vice President, Interim Chief Financial Officer of PayPal. Mr. Dupuis joined PayPal in November 2010 as its Chief Financial Officer. Mr. Dupuis was previously the Global Chief Financial Officer of Sitel Worldwide Corporation from January 2008 to November 2010.

Hill Ferguson is expected to serve as the Senior Vice President, Consumer of PayPal. Prior to the separation, Mr. Ferguson was the Senior Vice President, Global Product, for PayPal from August 2013. From August 2011

through August 2013, Mr. Ferguson was the Vice President, Global Product for PayPal. Mr. Ferguson was the Vice President of Product and Marketing at Zong, a mobile payments provider, from September 2008 through August 2011, when eBay acquired Zong.

Gary Marino is expected to serve as Senior Vice President, Global Credit and the Americas of PayPal. Mr. Marino co-founded Bill Me Later in 2001 and served as its CEO from 2001 through November 2009, when PayPal acquired Bill Me Later.

Louise Pentland is expected to serve as the Senior Vice President, General Counsel of PayPal. Ms. Pentland was previously the Executive Vice President and Chief Legal Officer at Nokia Corporation from July 2008 to July 2014. Ms. Pentland also served on the board of the Nokia Siemens Networks, a joint venture between Nokia and Siemens. Ms. Pentland was recently elected to the board of directors of Hitachi, Ltd.

William J. Ready is expected to serve as the Senior Vice President, Merchant and Next Generation Commerce of PayPal. Prior to the separation, Mr. Ready was the head of PayPal’s Braintree operations from the time of its acquisition in December 2013. Mr. Ready was the CEO of Braintree, an online payments provider, from October 2011 until its acquisition by eBay in December 2013. From July 2011 through October 2011, Mr. Ready was an executive in residence at Accel Partners, a leading Silicon Valley venture capital and growth equity firm. Mr. Ready was the president of iPay Technologies, Inc., a payments services provider, from 2008 through 2011. Mr. Ready managed iPay through its successful sale to Jack Henry and Associates in 2010.

The following table sets forth information as of June 26 2015 regarding those persons who are expected to serve on PayPal’s board of directors following the distribution. After the distribution, none of these individuals will be employees of eBay and, other than Mr. Omidyar, none of them will be directors of eBay.

Daniel H. Schulman’s extensive industry experience and knowledge of PayPal’s day-to-day operations, as well as his previous managerial experience in the payments and technology industries will enable Mr. Schulman to provide valuable perspectives on many issues facing PayPal, particularly with respect to business management and strategy. Mr. Schulman’s service on the board of directors will create an important link between management and the board and will provide PayPal with decisive and effective leadership.

John J. Donahoe has served as eBay’s President and Chief Executive Officer since March 2008, and as a director of eBay since January 2008. He is expected to continue in this role until the separation. From January 2012 until April 2012, Mr. Donahoe served as Interim President of PayPal. From January 2008 to March 2008, Mr. Donahoe served as CEO-designate of eBay. From March 2005 to January 2008, Mr. Donahoe served as President, eBay Marketplaces. From January 2000 to February 2005, Mr. Donahoe served as the Worldwide Managing Director of Bain & Company. Mr. Donahoe serves on the board of directors of Intel Corporation (where he currently serves as a member of the Compensation Committee and as a member of the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee) and of Nike, Inc. (where he currently serves as a member of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee). Mr. Donahoe will bring extensive industry experience and deep knowledge of PayPal’s day-to-day operations based on his current role as eBay’s President and Chief Executive Officer and previous managerial experience as Interim President of PayPal.

Jonathan Christodoro has served as a director of eBay since 2015. Mr. Christodoro has over 15 years of extensive financial, strategic and investment experience advising and investing in public companies, including at the board level. Mr. Christodoro has served as Managing Director of Icahn Capital LP since July 2012. Mr. Christodoro is responsible for identifying, analyzing and monitoring investment opportunities and portfolio companies for Icahn Capital. Prior to joining Icahn Capital, from 2007 to 2012, Mr. Christodoro served in various investment and research roles at P2 Capital Partners, LLC, Prentice Capital Management, LP and S.A.C. Capital Advisors, LP. Mr. Christodoro currently serves on the board of directors of Enzon Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (where he currently serves as Chairman of the Board, as a member of the Governance and Nominating Committee, as a member of the Finance and Audit Committee, and as a member of the Compensation Committee), Herbalife Ltd (where he currently serves as a member of the Nominating and Governance Committee and as a member of the Compensation Committee) and Hologic, Inc. (where he currently serves as a member of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and as a member of the Corporate Development Committee). Mr. Christodoro was previously a director of Talisman Energy Inc. from December 2013 to May 2015. Mr. Christodoro’s leadership and investment experience as a Managing Director of Icahn Capital LP will add to the strong expertise of the board of directors.

Scott D. Cook has served as a director of eBay since 1998. Mr. Cook has been a leader in the technology industry for the past 32 years. As co-founder of Intuit Inc., a global consumer-facing technology company, Mr. Cook has driven innovation and significant growth. Mr. Cook has served Intuit in various capacities since its founding, previously serving as CEO and Chairman, and has been the Chairman of the Executive Committee of the board of directors of Intuit since August 1998. Mr. Cook also serves on the board of directors of The Procter & Gamble Company (where he is Chair of the Innovation and Technology Committee and a member of the Compensation & Leadership Development Committee), and The Intuit Scholarship Foundation and Valhalla Foundation. Mr. Cook will bring strong technology leadership expertise, as well as extensive experience in product development and marketing, to the board of directors.

David W. Dorman has served as a director of eBay since 2014. Mr. Dorman has extensive experience in global telecommunications-related businesses as the former Chief Executive Officer of AT&T, as well as expertise in finance, strategic planning and public company executive compensation. Mr. Dorman has been the Non-Executive Chairman of the Board of CVS Health Corporation, a pharmacy healthcare provider since May 2011. He is also a Founding Partner of Centerview Capital, a private investment firm, since July 2013. Mr. Dorman also serves on the board of directors of Yum! Brands, Inc. and Motorola Solutions, Inc. and as a Trustee for Georgia Tech Foundation, Inc. Mr. Dorman’s leadership as former Chairman and CEO of AT&T will add to the strong leadership expertise of the board of directors.

Gail J. McGovern has served as a director of eBay since 2015. Ms. McGovern is currently the President and Chief Executive Officer of the American Red Cross and has served in that position since June 2008. Ms. McGovern is also a trustee of Johns Hopkins University and Johns Hopkins Medicine, and a director of DTE Energy Company and The Weather Company. Ms. McGovern’s leadership experience as President and Chief Executive Officer of the American Red Cross will add to the strong leadership expertise of the board of directors and will bring a strong perspective from the academic and nonprofit worlds. Ms. McGovern will also bring extensive executive experience in marketing and sales, customer relations, corporate finance, strategic planning and government relations and knowledge of regulatory matters.

David M. Moffett has served as a director of eBay since 2007. Mr. Moffett has more than 30 years of strategic finance, risk management, and operational experience in banking and payment processing. Mr. Moffett currently serves on the board of directors of CIT Group Inc. (where he currently serves as a member of the Compensation Committee) and of Genworth Financial, Inc. (where he currently serves as a member of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and as a member of the Legal and Public Affairs Committee). He also currently serves as a Trustee for Columbia Atlantic Mutual Funds and University of Oklahoma Foundation and as a consultant to various financial services companies. Mr. Moffett will bring extensive global financial management and regulatory expertise and leadership experience as a former Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of financial services companies. He will also bring extensive experience in the payments business as a result of his involvement with the development of U.S. Bancorp’s global expansion of its merchant processing business, which is particularly relevant to our business. His deep experience in leading successful acquisitions will also be very relevant to our board of directors.

Pierre M. Omidyar has served as a director and Chairman of eBay’s board of directors since eBay’s incorporation in May 1996. Mr. Omidyar has extensive experience as a technologist and innovator. His industry knowledge and long history of driving innovation will provide important expertise to PayPal that is technology driven and focused on innovation. As the founder of eBay, Mr. Omidyar will bring to the board of directors a deep understanding of the business and a long-standing history as a leader within the technology industry. In addition to eBay, Mr. Omidyar has also been a founder of several other innovative businesses, including the Omidyar Network and First Look. His extensive experiences as an entrepreneur are particularly relevant to our nimble, fast-changing business.

Frank D. Yeary has served as a director of eBay since 2015. Mr. Yeary has been Executive Chairman of CamberView Partners, LLC, a corporate advisory firm, since 2012. Mr. Yeary was Vice Chancellor of the

University California, Berkeley from 2008 to 2012, where he led and implemented major strategic and financial changes to the university’s financial and operating strategy; from 2010 to 2011, he served as interim Chief Administrative Officer, managing a portfolio of financial and operational responsibilities and departments. Prior to 2008, Mr. Yeary spent 25 years in the finance industry, most recently as Managing Director, Global Head of Mergers and Acquisitions and a member of the Management Committee at Citigroup Investment Banking, a financial services company. Mr. Yeary currently serves on the board of directors of Intel Corporation (where he currently serves as the Chair of the Audit Committee). Mr. Yeary’s extensive career in investment banking and finance will bring to the board of directors financial strategy and M&A expertise, including expertise in financial reporting and experience in assessing the efficacy of mergers and acquisitions. In addition, Mr. Yeary’s experience as the former Vice Chancellor and Chief Administrative Officer of a large public research university, will add to the board’s strategic and financial expertise.

At the time of the distribution, we expect that our board of directors will consist of the directors set forth above. Each of our directors will have terms expiring at the first annual meeting of stockholders following the distribution, which PayPal expects to hold within 12 months from the distribution. Commencing with this first annual meeting of stockholders, each of our directors will be elected by our stockholders to serve until the next annual meeting of our stockholders and until his or her successor is duly elected and qualifies. Holders of shares of common stock will have no right to cumulative voting in the election of directors.

Under the rules of The NASDAQ Stock Market, or NASDAQ, PayPal must have a board of directors with at least a majority of independent directors. These rules have both objective tests and a subjective test for determining who is an “independent director.” The objective tests state, among other items, that a director is not considered independent if he or she is an employee of the company, or is a partner in, or a controlling stockholder or executive officer of, an entity to which the company made, or from which the company received, payments in the current or any of the past three fiscal years that exceed 5% of the recipient’s consolidated gross revenue for that year. The subjective test requires our board to affirmatively determine that a director does not have a relationship that would interfere with the director’s exercise of independent judgment in carrying out his or her responsibilities. On an annual basis, each member of our board will be required to complete a questionnaire designed to provide information to assist the board in determining whether the director is independent under the listing standards of The NASDAQ Stock Market and PayPal’s Corporate Governance Guidelines to be adopted by the board (and for members of our Audit Committee and Compensation Committee, whether the director satisfies additional SEC and The NASDAQ Stock Market independence requirements). It is expected that PayPal’s board will adopt guidelines setting forth certain categories of transactions, relationships, and arrangements that it has deemed immaterial for purposes of making its determination regarding a director’s independence, and does not consider any such transactions, relationships, and arrangements in making its subjective determination.

It is expected that a majority of PayPal’s board of directors will be comprised of directors who are “independent” as defined by the rules of The NASDAQ Stock Market and the Corporate Governance Guidelines to be adopted by the board. PayPal will seek to have its non-management directors qualify as “independent” under these standards.

The board will limit membership on the Audit Committee, the Compensation Committee, and the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee to independent directors. PayPal’s Corporate Governance Guidelines to be adopted by the board will require any director who has previously been determined to be independent to inform the Lead Independent Director and PayPal’s Corporate Secretary of any change in his or her principal occupation or status as a member of the board of any other public company, or any change in circumstance that may cause his or her status as an independent director to change.

Effective upon the completion of the distribution, PayPal’s board of directors expects to have the following standing committees: an Audit Committee, a Compensation Committee, and a Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee. The board of directors may determine that additional formal or informal committees may be appropriate.

Audit Committee. PayPal’s board of directors will have a separately-designated standing Audit Committee established in accordance with Section 3(a)(58)(A) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). The Audit Committee is expected to consist of David M. Moffett, Frank D. Yeary and Gail J. McGovern. Mr. Moffett is expected to be the Audit Committee Chairman. It is expected that each of the members of the Audit Committee will be independent in accordance with the rules and regulations of The NASDAQ Stock Market and the SEC. The primary responsibilities of the Audit Committee will be set forth in the charter of the Audit Committee and are expected to consist of meeting with PayPal’s independent auditors to review the results of the annual audit and to discuss PayPal’s financial statements, including the independent auditors’ judgment about the quality of accounting principles, the reasonableness of significant judgments, the clarity of the disclosures in our financial statements, our internal control over financial reporting, and management’s report with respect to internal control over financial reporting. Additionally, the Audit Committee is expected to meet with the independent auditors to review the interim financial statements prior to the filing of Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, recommend to the board of directors the independent auditors to be retained by PayPal, oversee the independence of the independent auditors, evaluate the independent auditors’ performance, review and approve the fees of the independent auditors, and receive and consider the independent auditors’ comments as to controls, adequacy of staff, and management performance and procedures in connection with audit and financial controls, including PayPal’s system to monitor and manage business risks and legal and ethical compliance programs. The Audit Committee is expected to approve the appointment, compensation, and performance of PayPal’s Vice President, Chief Audit Executive, who is expected to report directly to the committee and meet with the committee regularly without other members of management present.

The Audit Committee is also expected to prepare the Audit Committee Report for inclusion in PayPal’s proxy statement, approve audit and non-audit services provided to PayPal by its independent auditors, consider conflicts of interest and review all transactions with related persons involving executive officers or board members that are reasonably expected to exceed specified thresholds, and meet with internal legal counsel to discuss our major risk exposures, including financial, operational, privacy, security, competition, and legal and regulatory risks, and will review significant legal, compliance, and regulatory matters that could have a material impact on PayPal’s financial statements or business, including material notices to or inquiries received from governmental agencies. It is expected that Mr. Moffett will be determined to be an “audit committee financial expert” as defined by the SEC.

Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee is expected to consist of David W. Dorman, Jonathan Christodoro and Scott D. Cook. Mr. Dorman is expected to be the Compensation Committee Chairman. It is expected that each of the members of the Compensation Committee will be independent in accordance with the rules and regulations of The NASDAQ Stock Market and the SEC. The Compensation Committee will assist the board of directors in carrying out the board’s responsibilities relating to the compensation of PayPal’s executive officers and directors. The primary responsibilities of the Compensation Committee will be set forth in the charter of the Compensation Committee and are expected to include:

Additionally, the Compensation Committee is expected to assess on an annual basis the independence of its compensation consultants, outside legal counsel, and other compensation advisers.

Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee. The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee is expected to consist of Gail J. McGovern and Scott D. Cook. Ms. McGovern is expected to be the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee Chair. It expected that each of the members of the board’s Compensation Committee will be independent in accordance with the rules and regulations of The NASDAQ Stock Market and the SEC.

The primary responsibilities of the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee will be set forth in the charter of the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee and are expected to include:

The committee will consider nominee recommendations from a variety of sources, including nominees recommended by stockholders. The committee might, from time to time, retain an executive search firm to help facilitate the screening and interview process of director nominees. The committee expects that qualified candidates will have high-level managerial experience in a relatively complex organization or be accustomed to dealing with complex problems, and will be able to represent the interests of the stockholders as a whole rather than special interest groups or constituencies.

Among other factors, the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee is expected to consider each candidate relative to the following attributes:

It is expected that the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee will also consider the interplay of a candidate’s background and expertise with that of other board members, and the extent to which a candidate may be a desirable addition to any committee of the board of directors. The committee also expects that it will value diversity as a factor in selecting nominees to serve on the board of directors. PayPal’s Corporate Governance Guidelines are expected to provide that the committee should consider diversity (including gender and race), age, international background, and expertise in evaluating potential board members. It is expected that when searching for new directors, the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee will actively seek out qualified women and individuals from minority groups to include in the pool from which board nominees are chosen.

In addition to recommending director candidates, it is expected that the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee will establish procedures for the oversight and evaluation of the board and management, will review correspondence received from stockholders, and will review on an annual basis PayPal’s Corporate Governance Guidelines to be adopted by the board.

During PayPal’s year ended December 31, 2014, PayPal was not an independent company, and did not have a compensation committee or any other committee serving a similar function. Decisions as to the compensation of those who currently serve as PayPal’s executive officers were made by eBay, as described in the section of this information statement captioned “Compensation Discussion and Analysis.”

PayPal’s bylaws will contain provisions that address the process by which a stockholder may nominate an individual to stand for election to the board of directors. PayPal will evaluate stockholder recommendations of board candidates based on the principles outlined in the section of this information statement captioned “Directors—Committees of the Board of Directors—Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee.”

PayPal’s bylaws will provide that PayPal’s board will elect the Chairman and the Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”). PayPal’s Corporate Governance Guidelines to be adopted by the board are expected to require that the roles of Chairman and CEO be held by separate individuals. Mr. Donahoe is expected to serve as our Chairman. The separation of the offices of the Chairman and CEO is appropriate as it aids in the board’s oversight of management and it allows our CEO to focus primarily on his management responsibilities.

PayPal’s independent directors are also expected to designate a Lead Independent Director. Mr. Moffett is expected to be designated as the Lead Independent Director. In addition to the duties of all board members, the position of the Lead Independent Director is expected to come with significant responsibilities pursuant to PayPal’s Corporate Governance Guidelines to be adopted by the board, including to:

Each committee expects to meet regularly and will have a written charter to be adopted by the board. These charters will be posted on PayPal’s website in connection with the separation. In addition, at each regularly scheduled board meeting, a member of each committee will report on any significant matters addressed by the committee since the last board meeting. It is expected that each committee will perform an annual self-assessment to evaluate its effectiveness in fulfilling its obligations.

Risk is inherent with every business, and how well a business manages risk can ultimately determine its success. PayPal will face a number of risks, including economic, financial, legal and regulatory, operational, and other risks, such as the impact of competition. See the section entitled “Risk Factors.” Management is expected to be responsible for the day-to-day management of the risks that PayPal will face, while the board, as a whole and through its committees, will have the responsibility for the oversight of risk management. In its risk oversight role, the board will be responsible for satisfying itself that the risk management framework and supporting processes as implemented by management are adequate and functioning as designed. Prior to the distribution, PayPal will develop more detailed policies and responsibilities relating to risk oversight.

PayPal will establish a corporate hotline (operated by a third party) to allow any employee to confidentially and anonymously (where legally permissible) lodge a complaint about any accounting, internal control, auditing, or other matters of concern.

PayPal will encourage regular engagement with stockholders to seek their feedback.

The board is expected to adopt a policy permitting stockholders to communicate with the board or individual directors care of the Corporate Secretary, c/o PayPal Holdings, Inc., 2211 North First Street, San Jose, California 95131. It is expected that the primary responsibility for initial review of stockholder communications will be delegated to PayPal’s Corporate Secretary to assist the board in reviewing and responding to stockholder communications in an appropriate manner. The policy adopted by the board is expected to instruct PayPal’s Corporate Secretary to review correspondence directed to the board of directors and its principal committees and, at his or her discretion, not to forward items solely related to complaints by users with respect to ordinary course of business customer service and satisfaction issues, or that he or she deems to be of a commercial or frivolous nature or otherwise inappropriate for the board’s or its committees’ consideration.

Absent exigent circumstances, all directors will be expected to attend PayPal’s annual meeting of stockholders in person or by telephone or video call.

As part of each regularly scheduled board meeting, the outside directors will have the opportunity to meet without our management or the other directors. The executive sessions will include discussions and recommendations regarding guidance to be provided to the Chief Executive Officer and such topics as the independent directors determine. The Lead Independent Director will lead such discussions.

The Compensation Committee will be responsible for reviewing and making recommendations to the Board regarding compensation paid to all directors who are not employees of PayPal, or any parent, subsidiary or affiliate of PayPal, for their Board and committee services.

The 2015 compensation to non-employee directors (on an annual basis) will consist of an annual retainer of $80,000 paid in cash in quarterly installments (or, at the non-employee director’s election, paid in part or in whole in deferred stock units or DSUs of an equivalent value). The annual retainer is pro-rated in the event that a director serves for a portion of a year. For 2016, we plan on reviewing our board compensation, including our practice of granting $220,000 of DSUs (rounded up to the nearest whole share) at the time of our annual meeting.

DSUs represent a right to receive shares of PayPal common stock on a future date. DSU awards will vest as to 100% on the first anniversary of the date of grant (or, if earlier, at the next annual meeting), provided the director continues to serve as a director or consultant of PayPal. In addition, DSUs resulting from a director’s election described above are 100% vested at grant. In the event of a change in control of PayPal, any equity awards granted to our non-employee directors will become fully vested.

The expected compensation for a non-executive chair will consist of $100,000 paid as DSUs in the same manner as for other directors and $100,000 paid in cash (or at the non-executive chair’s election, paid in part or in whole in DSUs of an equivalent value).

The following table sets forth annual retainers for our non-employee directors who serve as Lead Independent Director; the Chairs of the Audit, Compensation, and Corporate Governance and Nominating Committees; and the members of those Committees.

It is expected that the board will adopt stock ownership guidelines to better align the interests of our directors and executive officers with the interests of stockholders and further promote commitment to sound corporate governance. Under these guidelines, PayPal’s executive officers and non-employee directors will each be required to achieve a specified guideline level of ownership of PayPal common stock.

We expect that the PayPal Incentive Plan and PayPal’s equity incentive plans will provide that awards made under those plans are subject to a clawback provision. The terms of the clawback will be adopted by the Compensation Committee, subject to amendment to comply with the SEC rules to be issued in accordance with the Dodd-Frank Act and any other applicable law, regulation or rule.

The board and each of its principal committees may retain outside advisors of their choosing at PayPal’s expense. The board need not obtain management’s consent to retain outside advisors. In addition, the principal committees need not obtain either the board’s or management’s consent to retain outside advisors.

We expect that PayPal’s directors, executive officers, and other employees will conduct themselves with the highest degree of integrity, ethics, and honesty. PayPal’s credibility and reputation will depend upon the good judgment, ethical standards, and personal integrity of each director, executive officer, and other employee. It is expected that PayPal’s Corporate Governance Guidelines to be adopted by the board will prohibit directors from

serving on the board of another company (other than eBay), or in a senior executive role of another company that would create a significant conflict of interest. It is expected that our Code of Business Conduct will require that directors, executive officers, and other employees disclose actual or potential conflicts of interest and recuse themselves from related decisions. In order to better protect PayPal and its stockholders, the board expects to regularly review its Code of Business Conduct and related policies to ensure that they provide clear guidance to our directors, executive officers, and other employees.

It is important that the board and its committees perform effectively and in the best interest of PayPal and its stockholders. The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee is expected to lead the board in performing an annual self-assessment to evaluate the board’s effectiveness in fulfilling its obligations. As part of this annual self-assessment, directors will be able to provide feedback on the performance of other directors.

As discussed above, PayPal is currently part of eBay and not an independent company, and its compensation committee is not expected to begin meeting until after the spin-off of the PayPal business (the “Spin-Off”). Decisions as to the compensation of those individuals who will be appointed as executive officers of PayPal have historically been made by the Compensation Committee of the board of directors of eBay (the “eBay Compensation Committee”) and/or the CEO of eBay. This Compensation Discussion and Analysis describes the compensation practices of eBay as they relate to certain individuals who are expected to be appointed as executive officers of PayPal. It also discusses certain aspects of PayPal’s anticipated compensation structure for these executive officers following the separation. After separation, PayPal’s executive compensation program, policies, and practices for its executive officers will be subject to the review and approval of the Compensation Committee of the PayPal board of directors (the “PayPal Compensation Committee”).

For purposes of the following Compensation Discussion and Analysis and the tabular executive compensation disclosures that follow, the individuals listed below are referred to collectively as PayPal’s “named executive officers” or “NEOs.” They are PayPal’s chief executive officer, interim chief financial officer, and, of the individuals who are expected to be designated as executive officers, the three most highly compensated based on 2014 reported compensation from eBay (other than the chief executive officer and interim chief financial officer).

Additional information regarding the other members of PayPal’s management who will be designated as executive officers is set forth in the section of the information statement captioned “Management—Executive Officers Following the Distribution.”

As described below, it is expected that upon separation, PayPal’s executive compensation program, policies, and practices will be largely the same as those employed at eBay. PayPal’s Compensation Committee will review the executive compensation program, policies and practices and will make adjustments as appropriate over time in order to meet the company’s particular business needs and goals.

The following sections of this Compensation Discussion and Analysis describe eBay’s general compensation philosophy, policies and practices as they applied to PayPal’s NEOs during 2014. We have noted where certain elements of eBay’s executive compensation program did not apply to one or more of the four NEOs employed by PayPal in 2014.

The eBay Compensation Committee believes that attracting and retaining superior talent—supported by a competitive compensation program that is highly performance-based—is key to delivering long-term stockholder returns. eBay’s executive compensation program was designed to:

To achieve these objectives, eBay has structured its executive compensation program around three principal components: long-term equity compensation, an annual cash incentive, and base salary. The eBay Compensation Committee sought to ensure that total compensation for eBay’s senior executives was heavily weighted to variable, performance-based compensation by delivering a majority of compensation in the form of performance-based restricted stock units (“PBRSUs”), stock options, and annual cash incentives.

The eBay Compensation Committee chose a mix of equity and cash compensation vehicles—some dependent purely on financial targets that the Committee believed correlated with operating performance and long-term eBay stock performance and others directly related to eBay’s stock price and the returns received by investors—to compensate senior management based on both long-term value drivers and returns received by eBay’s stockholders. eBay also maintained broad-based retirement and benefit programs in which the PayPal NEOs participated and provided limited perquisites to certain of the PayPal NEOs.

The following table provides a snapshot of the key elements of eBay’s 2014 executive compensation program and describes the rationale for each element and the relevant equity-based awards of the PayPal NEOs. Additional information about these key elements is included in the sections following the table.

In making decisions regarding the amount and form of each element of compensation for senior executives, the eBay Compensation Committee took into account the size and complexity of the executive officer’s job and business unit or function, including the following:

The eBay Compensation Committee gave no specific weighting to these goals and it and/or the CEO of eBay evaluated individual performance in a holistic manner.

In addition, the PayPal NEOs were eligible to participate in eBay’s health and welfare benefit plans, employee stock purchase plan, retirement savings plan, and deferred compensation plan, which are generally available to all of eBay’s employees, and to receive certain other limited perquisites. It is anticipated that, following the separation, the PayPal NEOs will participate in comparable programs offered by PayPal.

eBay has used three primary forms of equity compensation as part of its regular compensation program in 2014 for its senior executives employed in the level of senior vice president or above: PBRSUs, RSUs, and stock options.

The value of annual equity awards was determined within guidelines that the eBay Compensation Committee annually established for each position. These guidelines were based on eBay’s desired pay positioning relative to companies with which it competes for talent. The midpoint of the guidelines, or the median target award, reflects the 50th percentile of the competitive market. Individual awards were based on individual performance, potential, and the total value of unvested equity previously granted to each individual. The individual awards could be higher or lower than the median target award by an amount ranging from zero to three times the median target award.

In 2014, the eBay Compensation Committee set equity award guidelines by position based on: (a) equity compensation practices of technology companies in eBay’s peer group, as disclosed in their public filings, and (b) equity compensation practices for comparable technology companies that are included in proprietary third-party surveys.

Once the value of the annual equity incentive awards had been set for each executive officer, a formula was used to allocate the annual equity awards as follows:

The eBay Compensation Committee may make special equity-related compensation decisions for performance, retention, acquisitions, and/or recruitment purposes (including payments for equity or other

compensation awards from a former employer that an executive officer may be required to forfeit or forgo by accepting employment with the company) that cause individual equity compensation in a particular year to differ from the Committee’s regular stated compensation strategy and guidelines. As discussed in more detail below, 2014 was an extraordinary year for eBay in light of the departure of PayPal’s former President in June and our announcement of the planned Spin-Off in September. As a result, the Committee determined that it was necessary to make compensation decisions to help us attract and retain key executive officers deemed instrumental to the thoughtful and orderly execution of the Spin-Off and the positioning of PayPal for success as an independent, publicly-traded company. In this section we have described the general equity program design. See “Compensation Decisions for 2014 and Retention Agreements” below for decisions that were made specifically in relation to an acquisition, as a retention device following the departure of PayPal’s former President, and the Spin-Off.

Design and Performance Periods. The PayPal NEOs other than Mr. Ready were eligible to receive awards of PBRSUs, which were designed to result in grants of RSUs with additional time-based vesting requirements if eBay exceeds specified financial performance criteria set by the eBay Compensation Committee. The amount and value of the award depend on eBay’s performance relative to the performance goals approved by the eBay Compensation Committee at the beginning of the performance period, subject to the adjustments relating to the Spin-Off described under “Compensation Decisions for 2014 and Retention Agreements—Treatment of eBay Inc. Equity Awards.” The 2014-2015 PBRSU cycle has a two-year performance period.

Under the PBRSU program, assuming above-minimum threshold performance, PBRSU recipients would receive time-based RSUs. For the 2014-2015 performance period, for all eligible PayPal NEOs, one-half of the RSUs will vest in March following the end of the performance period and the other half of the award will vest in March of the following year, more than one full year following the completion of the performance period. Beginning with the 2015-2016 performance period, 100% of any PBRSU awards granted to PayPal’s CEO and CFO are expected to vest, if at all, one year after the grant of time-based RSUs is made following the end of the two-year performance period, subject to the PayPal Compensation Committee’s review and approval. This vesting schedule subjects 100% of PayPal’s CEO and CFO PBRSU awards to a full three years of stock price volatility before the shares vest. The eBay Compensation Committee believed that the post-performance period vesting feature of the PBRSUs provides an important mechanism that helped to retain and align their interests with long-term stockholder value.

Setting a Target Value of PBRSU Shares. As discussed above, the eBay Compensation Committee establishes a target level of total annual equity compensation for each employee at the level of senior vice president or above and awards a portion of his or her annual equity compensation in PBRSUs. If eBay’s performance meets the target performance goals, the target number of PBRSUs will be granted. If eBay’s performance exceeds or falls short of the target performance goals, the number of PBRSUs granted will be increased or decreased formulaically. As discussed in “Changes to PBRSU Program and Annual Cash Incentive

for 2015” below, the financial measures for the 2014-2015 performance period have been adjusted for the PayPal NEOs to focus on the performance of PayPal for 2015.

Performance Measures and Rationales. The following table outlines the performance measures for the 2014-2015 performance period and the eBay Compensation Committee’s rationale for their selection:

PBRSU Mechanics and Targets. The two year targets are generally set at a level consistent with the one-year income target for the annual cash incentive plan and the three year targets provided to the investment community at eBay’s analyst events. To receive a PBRSU grant, at least one of the FX-neutral revenue or non-GAAP operating margin dollars minimum performance thresholds must be met. Each of the minimum performance threshold for FX-neutral revenue and non-GAAP operating margin dollars is independent and, if either minimum threshold is met, the award is funded with respect to that performance measure in accordance with the percentages outlined in the table below. If the minimum performance level for either FX-neutral revenue or non-GAAP operating margin dollars is not met, then there is no funding attributable to that performance measure. For example, if the minimum FX-neutral revenue threshold is not met and performance of non-GAAP operating margin dollars is at target, the funding level is 50% of the total payout that would have been earned had the performance levels for both criteria been exactly at target, subject to the return on invested capital modifier.

The following chart shows the minimum, target, and maximum funding levels for FX-neutral revenue and non-GAAP operating margin dollars:

The number of shares awarded is determined by comparing actual performance for FX-neutral revenue and non-GAAP operating margin dollars over the performance period against the minimum, target, and maximum performance levels and converting the result into a funding percentage. The FX-neutral revenue and non-GAAP operating margin dollars measures are then added together and this total is multiplied by the third measure, return on invested capital, with the modification multiplier determined in accordance with the table below:

The target award is multiplied by the percentage resulting from this calculation to determine the actual number of PBRSUs awarded, subject to variation approved by the eBay Compensation Committee due to material events not contemplated at the time the targets were set (such as major acquisitions) and to the eBay Compensation Committee’s negative discretion. Accordingly, PBRSU awards range from 0% to 240% of the target award, based on FX-neutral revenue, non-GAAP operating margin dollars, and return on invested capital for the two-year performance period.

Design and Performance Period. eBay’s cash incentive plan, known as the eBay Incentive Plan, or eIP, is a short-term incentive plan. The eBay Compensation Committee determined the length of the performance period for the cash incentive plan, which had historically been annual (including for 2014). The eBay Compensation Committee believed that incentive payouts should be tightly linked to eBay’s performance, with individual compensation differentiated based on individual performance. When defining eBay’s company performance, the eBay Compensation Committee focused primarily on financial performance metrics (FX-neutral revenue and non-GAAP net income).

To support a tight link between eBay company performance and any incentive payouts, the annual cash incentives payable for 2014 had both a minimum FX-neutral revenue threshold and a minimum non-GAAP net income threshold. Unless both of these thresholds were met, there was no incentive payout. If both thresholds were met, eBay used total non-GAAP net income as the primary determinant of the payout for the annual cash incentive plan. The amount at which the plan was funded was determined based on eBay’s actual performance as measured against the targets set by the eBay Compensation Committee, with 75% of the award for the PayPal NEOs based on eBay’s non-GAAP net income financial performance.

To facilitate differentiation based on individual performance, 25% of the award for the PayPal NEOs was based on individual performance. In circumstances where eBay’s financial performance is above its threshold goal but below target, a modifier is applied to the individual performance component to reduce it proportionately based on eBay’s financial performance component. For example, if eBay exceeded the FX-neutral revenue threshold but total non-GAAP net income was 90% of target, then the individual performance component would be calculated as follows: Target incentive amount x 25% x individual performance score x 90%.

In 2014, the annual cash incentive program also included a customer satisfaction Net Promoter Score (NPS) and employee engagement Net Promoter Score (eNPS) incentive for eBay employees at director-level and above. Each of these was tied to the achievement of a statistically significant improvement over a multi-year period, and would result in an additional payout of 5% of the incentive target if the respective performance measure was achieved. These secondary measures were included to focus employees on improving NPS and eNPS.

Performance Measures and Rationale. The following table provides more information on the primary and individual performance measures set in 2014 for the PayPal NEOs and the rationale for their selection:

Annual Cash Incentive Plan Mechanics, Assessment, and Target Positioning Strategy. Each year, the eBay Compensation Committee established (1) eBay company performance measures based on business criteria and target levels of performance and (2) a formula for calculating a participant’s award based on actual eBay company performance compared to the pre-established performance measures. Performance measures were based on a wide variety of business metrics. The eBay Compensation Committee chose to use non-GAAP net income as its primary measure of performance for a number of years because it was the key measure of short- and intermediate-term results for eBay given that it could be directly affected by the decisions of eBay’s management and provided the most widely followed measure of financial performance. Targets were set in the first quarter of the year based primarily on eBay’s board-approved budget for the year.

After the end of each year, eBay’s actual performance was compared to the performance measures to determine the funding level of that portion of the annual cash incentive plan, subject to variation approved by the eBay Compensation Committee due to material events not contemplated at the time the targets were set (such as major acquisitions) and to the Committee’s negative discretion. eBay’s CEO presented the eBay Compensation Committee with his assessment of the individual performance of the eBay executive officers who were his direct

reports, including Mr. Schulman. The eBay Compensation Committee reviewed his assessments and made a subjective determination of the level of individual performance for each of those executive officers. In making its determination of the individual performance of each executive officer, the eBay Compensation Committee did not give any specific weighting to individual goals. The President of PayPal presented to eBay’s CEO his assessment of the individual performance of each of the PayPal NEOs that were not direct reports to eBay’s CEO in 2014. eBay’s CEO considered his own assessment of individual performance, including for the time he served as interim President of PayPal, and made a subjective determination of the level of individual performance for each of those PayPal NEOs.

Assessment and Target Positioning Strategy. At the beginning of each year, the eBay Compensation Committee meets to review market data and to review and approve each executive officer’s base salary for the year. At these meetings, the eBay Compensation Committee assesses competitive market data on base salaries from public filings of eBay’s peer group companies and general industry data for comparable technology companies that are included in proprietary third-party surveys. When considering the competitive market data, the eBay Compensation Committee also considers the fact that the data is historical and does not necessarily reflect those companies’ current pay practices. The eBay Compensation Committee assesses each executive officer’s base salary against the 50th percentile of the salaries paid to comparable executives at eBay peer group companies. The Committee also considers individual performance, levels of responsibility, breadth of knowledge, and prior experience in its evaluation of base salary adjustments.

eBay provides certain executive officers with perquisites and other personal benefits not available to all eBay employees that the eBay Compensation Committee believes are reasonable and consistent with its overall compensation program and philosophy. These benefits are provided to enable eBay to attract and retain these executive officers. The eBay Compensation Committee periodically reviews the levels of these benefits provided to its executive officers. See “Compensation Decisions for 2014 and Retention Agreements—Hiring Dan Schulman as President of PayPal and its CEO Following the Spin-Off” below for a description of the perquisites that were offered to Mr. Schulman in connection with his offer to join eBay.

PayPal expects that the executive compensation program that it initially adopts will be similar to the program in place at eBay immediately prior to the separation. Following the separation, PayPal’s Compensation Committee will continue to consider and develop PayPal’s compensation practices in order to meet and advance the company’s business needs and goals.

When making compensation decisions, the eBay Compensation Committee evaluated the executives who will become the PayPal NEOs based on their leadership, competencies, innovation, and both past and expected future contributions toward PayPal’s financial, strategic and other priorities, including the value of acquisitions to PayPal. In addition, the eBay Compensation Committee considered the impact of succession planning (including in connection with the announcement of the Spin-Off), individual holding power, and retention concerns, including in connection with the departure of the former President of PayPal, the announcement of the Spin-Off, and onboarding a new CEO-designee of PayPal. The eBay Compensation Committee also reviewed the total value of each NEO’s unvested equity awards. Based on its assessment, the eBay Compensation Committee determined individual awards based on the factors and guidelines described above. The following sections describe the compensation decisions made by the eBay Compensation Committee for the PayPal NEOs.

2014 Compensation Review, Supplemental Equity Awards Following Departure of PayPal’s Former President, and Retention Awards

Each year, the eBay Compensation Committee reviews the total target equity awards, target annual cash incentive award, and salary for each employee at the level of senior vice president and above. In 2014, PBRSUs, RSUs, and stock options were the only types of equity incentive awards granted to the PayPal NEOs. Of the PayPal NEOs employed as of the time of eBay’s regular 2014 annual compensation review, only Mr. Dupuis, Mr. Barrese, and Mr. Ferguson received awards of PBRSUs. For Messrs. Dupuis, Barrese, and Ferguson, PBRSU awards for the 2014-2015 performance cycle constituted 50% of the value of their target annual equity award. As described below, Mr. Ready was not eligible to participate in the company’s annual focal program in 2014, and Mr. Schulman had not yet joined PayPal.

The following chart shows the compensation arrangements for Mr. Dupuis, Mr. Barrese, and Mr. Hill, effective April 1, 2014 (i.e., the Focal Date):

In addition, following the resignation of PayPal’s former president in June 2014, the eBay Compensation Committee determined it was critical to ensure eBay retained key members of PayPal’s senior executive team during the search for and transition to a new President of PayPal and to successfully execute PayPal’s business priorities during the transition period. Recognizing that members of PayPal’s senior executive team are actively recruited for senior leadership positions at other organizations from time to time, the eBay Compensation Committee approved supplemental awards of RSUs with a target grant date value of $5 million to each of Mr. Barrese and Mr. Ferguson and a target grant date value of $2 million to Mr. Dupuis to help ensure the continuity of PayPal’s senior executive team. Because the supplemental awards were designed to ensure continued service beyond the transition to a new President of PayPal, the RSU awards vest based on continued service with PayPal over a three-year period.

In connection with Mr. Dupuis’ hiring in 2010, he was eligible to receive a supplemental cash bonus of up to $200,000, which was paid in four equal annual installments of $50,000 from 2011 to 2014. In August 2014, when the eBay Compensation Committee approved the supplemental award of RSUs to Mr. Dupuis described above, it also approved a retention arrangement and two supplemental cash payments of $50,000 for Mr. Dupuis to be paid in 2015 and 2016, subject to his continued employment on each payment date. In December 2014, the retention arrangement was modified to provide that in the event Mr. Dupuis remains employed by PayPal through an agreed upon date that will be no longer than 30 days after the date a new chief financial officer is appointed at PayPal, then upon separation the company will make a cash payment to Mr. Dupuis equal to the following, provided Mr. Dupuis signs and does not revoke a waiver and release of claims:

In December 2013, PayPal acquired Braintree, Inc. (“Braintree”), where Mr. Ready served as chief executive officer, for total consideration of $713 million. In connection with the acquisition, Mr. Ready received awards of RSUs from eBay in January 2014 with a target grant date value of $30,320,000, subject to a four-year vesting schedule. At the time Mr. Ready joined PayPal in 2013 and during 2014, there were no changes to his salary or target annual cash incentive award, which were $300,000 and 66.67%, respectively. In addition, Mr. Ready was not eligible to participate in eBay’s regular annual compensation review in 2014 and therefore did not receive any additional equity awards or adjustments to his salary or target annual cash incentive award for 2014. See also “Retention Agreements Approved in 2015 for Mr. Barrese and Mr. Ready” below.

Hiring Dan Schulman as President of PayPal and its CEO Following the Spin-Off

In connection with hiring Mr. Schulman to become the future CEO of PayPal, the eBay Compensation Committee conducted a comprehensive review of pay structures for CEOs at comparable public companies as well as internal pay at eBay. The eBay Compensation Committee concluded that it was important to provide a target total compensation opportunity competitive with the compensation of leaders at other major internet and technology companies, with an annual compensation structure consistent with eBay’s current pay for performance philosophy and weighted heavily in favor of performance-based compensation, excluding the one-time make-good awards and payments. In considering the compensation package for Mr. Schulman, the eBay Compensation Committee was mindful of the competition for talented executives in the technology and payments sectors, Mr. Schulman’s existing compensation arrangements with his then-current employer—including equity and incentive compensation that would be forfeited in connection with his departure, as well as clawback provisions that would require him to repay gains made on certain equity awards and annual incentive payments—and the demands on and responsibilities of the leader of a global organization with PayPal’s scope and stature. Overall, the eBay Compensation Committee concluded that the complexity of the PayPal business, the demands on that business as an independent publicly traded company and the competitive market data should result in a compensation arrangement substantially similar to that of Mr. Donahoe’s compensation as CEO of eBay. Accordingly, the eBay Compensation Committee approved the following compensation arrangements for Mr. Schulman in connection with his appointment as President of PayPal and its CEO following the Spin-Off:

In connection with his prior employment, Mr. Schulman was subject to a “clawback agreement” that would require Mr. Schulman to repay his former employer for gains made on equity and incentive awards, as well as forfeited equity awards, in the event he accepted employment with a company viewed to be a strategic competitor. By accepting employment with PayPal, which was designated as a strategic competitor, Mr. Schulman was required to make repayments and forfeit vested equity with a total value in excess of $17 million. In recognition of the clawback repayments and forfeited vested equity plus the fact that Mr. Schulman

would be foregoing performance-based compensation that he had substantially earned prior to joining eBay, Mr. Schulman was granted a number of “make-good” awards, as follows:

eBay also agreed to the size of Mr. Schulman’s annual equity award for 2015 as well as an equity award upon the completion of the Spin-Off as follows:

In addition, eBay assisted Mr. Schulman with certain expenses he incurred in connection with his relocation to the San Francisco Bay Area. Mr. Schulman’s relocation assistance included assistance with selected costs and expenses related to moving from New York to the San Francisco Bay Area (including temporary housing and transportation) and related tax reimbursements, consistent with eBay’s existing relocation policies.

For the executives who will become PayPal NEOs, the eBay Compensation Committee determined that it would make the following adjustments as a result of the Spin-Off:

Modification of existing awards for Messrs. Schulman, Dupuis, Barrese, and Ferguson:

In preparation of PayPal becoming an independent public company, the eBay Compensation Committee approved certain retention arrangements in 2015 for Mr. Barrese and Mr. Ready that were intended to ensure that PayPal would have a stable leadership team following the Spin-Off.

Pursuant to the retention arrangements for Mr. Barrese, if he remains employed with PayPal through April 1, 2016, he is entitled to accelerated vesting of equity that would have otherwise vested from April 2, 2016 through April 30, 2017. In addition, if Mr. Barrese remains employed with PayPal through April 1, 2016 and subsequently (i) resigns from his employment, (ii) does not qualify for the severance protection for a voluntary resignation for “Good Reason” described in the “Termination During a Change in Control Period” section below, and (iii) signs and does not revoke a waiver and release of claims, then Mr. Barrese will be eligible to receive:

Pursuant to the retention arrangements for Mr. Ready, if he remains employed with PayPal through January 15, 2016, the remaining vesting schedule for the two grants of restricted stock units awarded by eBay Inc. on January 15, 2014 (the “Initial eBay RSU Awards”) will be modified to provide for monthly vesting such that 3 1/3% of the unvested RSUs will vest monthly beginning in February 2016. In addition, if Mr. Ready remains employed with PayPal through February 1, 2016 and prior to the full vesting of the Initial eBay RSU Awards he subsequently (i) resigns from his employment, (ii) does not qualify for the severance protection for a voluntary resignation for “Good Reason” described in the “Termination During a Change in Control Period” section below, and (iii) signs and does not revoke a waiver and release of claims, then Mr. Ready will be eligible to receive a cash payment equal to the value of the equity subject to the Initial eBay RSU Awards that would otherwise have vested in the six months following the effective date of his termination.

As discussed in more detail in “Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions—Employee Matters Agreement—Equity Compensation Awards,” below, subject to certain exceptions, eBay equity-based compensation awards will either continue as adjusted eBay awards or be converted into PayPal awards upon the separation, depending on which entity employs the person who holds the award. eBay equity awards held by PayPal employees will be converted into awards that relate to shares of PayPal common stock, and equity awards held by employees who will remain employed by eBay after the separation will be adjusted to reflect the separation and continue to relate to shares of eBay common stock. Specifically, outstanding equity awards held by PayPal employees, including the PayPal NEOs, are expected to be treated as shown in the table below:

eBay’s compensation programs were designed to align compensation with its business objectives and performance. The following is a summary of the business results that directly affected 2014 compensation, including performance-based equity awards and annual cash incentives.

eBay’s 2014 performance will impact the value of the 2014-2015 PBRSU awards to Messrs. Schulman, Dupuis, Barrese, and Ferguson. As described above, these awards have been modified for these individuals such that payouts will be based on aggregate eBay performance for 2014 and PayPal-specific performance for 2015.

The following shows the goals and 2014 performance under the financial and non-financial performance components of the annual cash incentive plan:

The funding level under the plan could range from 50% at the minimum non-GAAP net income level up to 200% at the maximum non-GAAP net income level (assuming the minimum FX-neutral revenue threshold was also met). As part of its review of eBay’s performance against its targets, the eBay Compensation Committee considered whether any significant corporate events, not contemplated at the time the targets were set, should lead to an adjustment of revenue or non-GAAP net income results. The eBay Compensation Committee concluded that eBay’s non-GAAP net income results should be adjusted to exclude the impact of (i) an increased tax rate driven by eBay having elected to subject more of its foreign earnings to U.S. taxation, and (ii) the interest expense associated with eBay’s $3.5 billion debt issuance in July 2014. Both of these actions resulted in an increase in eBay’s available U.S. cash and enhanced its financial flexibility.

Because minimum thresholds for both eBay’s company-wide FX-neutral revenue and non-GAAP net income were met in 2014, the individual performance component of the annual cash incentive plan was paid. However, eBay’s non-GAAP net income for 2014 was below target, and therefore the individual performance component was modified and funded at 94% in accordance with the terms of the plan and its application to all eligible employees of eBay.

Taking into account both eBay’s company and individual performance, total annual cash incentive amounts under the 2014 annual cash incentive for the PayPal NEOs were paid as follows:

SEVERANCE AND CHANGE-IN-CONTROL ARRANGEMENTS WITH EXECUTIVE OFFICERS, AND CLAWBACKS

When approving or establishing the severance and change-in-control arrangements described below, the eBay Compensation Committee attempted to provide severance benefits with sufficient protections and retention incentives for the executive officer and which were aligned with the interests of eBay and its stockholders. The eBay Compensation Committee believes that these protections help eBay to attract and retain highly talented employees, including the PayPal NEOs.

In connection with becoming President of PayPal and its CEO-designee, Mr. Schulman received an offer letter that included severance arrangements. Under these arrangements, Mr. Schulman is entitled to receive the following if he is terminated without cause or resigns for good reason (each as defined in the letter) and he signs and does not revoke a waiver and release of claims:

In the event the Spin-Off does not occur within two years from Mr. Schulman’s start date and he is terminated without cause or resigns for good reason, in addition to the cash payment equal to the value of the unvested Initial Equity Awards and Make-Good RSU awards described above, he will also be eligible to receive the cash value of any unvested equity awards not covered above that would otherwise have vested within 24 months of his termination date.

The “Change in Control Period” begins 90 days before a Change in Control (as defined in eBay’s 2008 Equity Incentive Award Plan, as amended and restated) and ends 24 months after a Change in Control.

In the event Mr. Schulman’s employment terminates due to his death or permanent disability, he or his estate will receive, within 30 days of his termination date, a cash payment equal to the value of any equity awards that would have become vested within the following 24 months.

For purposes of Mr. Schulman’s offer letter, “Cause,” “Good Reason,” and “Change in Control” are summarized as follows:

As discussed in the 2014 compensation review section above, in the event Mr. Dupuis remains employed by PayPal through an agreed upon date that will be no longer than 30 days after the date a new chief financial officer is appointed at PayPal, then upon separation the company will make a cash payment to Mr. Dupuis equal to the following, provided Mr. Dupuis signs and does not revoke a waiver and release of claims:

In addition to the retention arrangements described above, the eBay Compensation Committee approved certain severance and change in control arrangements in 2015 for Mr. Barrese and Mr. Ready. Under these arrangements, each of Mr. Barrese and Mr. Ready is entitled to receive the following if he is terminated by the company without cause (as defined in the letter and summarized below) outside of a change in control period (as described below) and signs and does not revoke a waiver and release of claims:

If Mr. Barrese or Mr. Ready is terminated without cause or resigns for good reason (each as defined in the letter and summarized below) during a change in control period and signs and does not revoke a waiver and release of claims, then he would be entitled to:

In the event Mr. Barrese’s or Mr. Ready’s employment terminates due to his death or permanent disability, he or his estate will receive, within 30 days of his termination date, a cash payment equal to the value of any equity awards that would have become vested within 24 months following such termination date.

For purposes of Mr. Barrese’s and Mr. Ready’s letters, the following definitions apply:

Additional Severance Arrangements for an Involuntary Termination for Mr. Ready

In connection with PayPal’s acquisition of Braintree in December 2013, Braintree granted RSU awards to Mr. Ready prior to closing in recognition of his significant contributions to Braintree. Upon the completion of the acquisition, eBay (as PayPal, Inc.’s parent) assumed the RSU awards granted by Braintree to Mr. Ready. Under the terms of those awards, Mr. Ready would be entitled to full acceleration of any then-unvested RSUs if his employment was terminated by Braintree without “cause” or he resigned with “good reason” (as defined in his Braintree RSU agreements).

For purposes of Mr. Ready’s Braintree RSU awards, “Cause” and “Good Reason” are generally defined as follows:

PayPal has not entered into any arrangements with any of its executive officers to provide “single trigger” severance payments upon a change in control. As described above, eBay has put change-in-control protections in place for Mr. Schulman, Mr. Barrese, and Mr. Ready. In the event that payments or benefits owed to Mr. Schulman, Mr. Barrese or Mr. Ready constitute “parachute payments” (within the meaning of Section 280G of the Code) and would be subject to the excise tax imposed by Section 4999 of the Code, such payments or benefits may be reduced to an amount that does not result in the imposition of such excise tax, if such reduction results in the executive receiving a higher net-after-tax amount than he would have absent such reduction.

eBay’s equity incentive plans generally provide for the acceleration of vesting of awards granted under the plans upon a change in control (as defined in the applicable plan) only if the acquiring entity does not agree to

assume or continue the awards. These provisions generally apply to all holders of awards under the equity incentive plans. See “Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control” below for information regarding the impact to PayPal’s NEOs in the event of termination or a change in control, assuming that their employment was terminated or a change-in-control occurred on December 31, 2014.

On June 16, 2015, PayPal adopted the (i) PayPal Change in Control Severance Plan for Key Employees (the “CIC Severance Plan”), for executive officers at or above the level of Vice President and Fellows, and (ii) the PayPal SVP and Above Standard Severance Plan (the “Standard Severance Plan”) for officers at or above the level of Senior Vice President. These plans will be effective immediately following the Distribution.

Eligible employees are selected by the Compensation Committee to participate in the CIC Severance Plan and Standard Severance Plan. Unless otherwise determined by the Compensation Committee, any officer who is eligible to receive severance payments and/or benefits under an individual employment letter agreement or other agreement under circumstances that would give rise to a right to receive payments and benefits under the CIC Severance Plan or the Standard Severance Plan is not eligible to receive payments or benefits in the respective plan; except, if the officer is not subject to income tax in the USA and the present value of the payments and benefits payable under such individual arrangement is less than that payable under the respective plan, such officer will be eligible under the plan. Currently, as described above, Messrs. Schulman, Dupuis, Ready and Barrese all have arrangements that provide for severance payments and benefits and, therefore, are not expected to be eligible to participate in either of the two plans at this time.

The CIC Severance Plan provides eligible employees with severance payments and benefits in the event that an eligible employee’s employment with us or one of our subsidiaries, affiliates or a successor company is terminated within 90 days prior to, or within 24-months immediately following, a “change in control” of us (the “change in control period”) either (a) by the employer company for any reason other than “cause”, “disability” or death or (b) by the eligible employee for “good reason”. The severance payments and benefits to be provided, subject to the employee’s execution of a release of claims, are as follows:

In addition, if an eligible employee dies or becomes disabled at any time during the change in control period, his or her unvested equity awards will also be treated as fully vested and be settled in the same manner as described in item (4) above assuming achievement of target performance, as applicable.

The payment of all of the benefits described above will be within 90 days following the termination of employment, except as noted above.

Under the CIC Severance Plan, in the event any payments or benefits constitute “golden parachute payments” within the meaning of IRC Section 280G and would be subject to the excise tax imposed by IRC Section 4999, such payments or benefits will be reduced to the maximum amount that does not result in the imposition of such excise tax, but only if such reduction results in the officer receiving a higher net-after tax amount than such officer would have received absent such reduction.

The Standard Severance Plan provides eligible employees with severance payments and benefits in the event that an eligible employee’s employment with us or one of our subsidiaries, affiliates or a successor company is terminated without “cause” by us outside of the “change in control period” (as defined above). The severance payments and benefits payable under this plan, as well as the timing of and conditions for such payments and benefits, are generally the same as those under the CIC Severance Plan for, at this time, only Senior Vice Presidents who would fall into the category of employees receiving an applicable multiple of one, with the following differences:

For purposes of the CIC Severance Plan and Standard Severance Plan, “change in control”, “cause”, “disabled”, and (for the CIC Severance Plan only) “good reason” are each defined in the respective plans and are generally defined as summarized below:

“change in control” has the same meaning as under the PayPal Holdings, Inc. Equity Award Incentive Plan under which PayPal is then granting equity awards, as in effect from time to time.

“cause” is defined as (a) a failure to attempt in good faith to substantially perform assigned duties, other than failure resulting from death or incapacity due to physical or mental illness or impairment, which is not remedied within thirty (30) days after receipt of written notice from us specifying such failure; (b) indictment for, conviction of or plea of nolo contendere to any felony (or any other crime involving fraud, dishonesty or moral turpitude); or (c) commission of an act of fraud, embezzlement, misappropriation, willful misconduct, or breach of fiduciary duty against the company, except good faith expense account disputes.

“disabled” has the same meaning as under the long-term disability plan under which the eligible employee is covered as of the date of termination of employment.

“good reason” means the occurrence of any of the following without the written consent of the eligible employee (subject to notice and a cure period): (a) in the case of Senior Vice Presidents and those Vice Presidents designated by the Compensation Committee: (i) a material reduction in annual total target compensation (which is comprised of annual base salary rate and annual target bonus opportunity under PayPal’s annual incentive plan or applicable successor plan ); (ii) a material reduction in reporting relationship and/or diminution in scope of responsibilities; or (iii) a relocation of the principal workplace location by more than thirty-five (35) miles; and (b) in the case of all other Vice Presidents and Fellows, (i) a material reduction in annual total target compensation (which is comprised of annual base salary rate and annual target bonus opportunity under PayPal’s annual incentive plan or applicable successor plan); or (ii) a relocation of the principal workplace location by more than thirty-five (35) miles.

The eBay Compensation Committee has adopted a clawback policy that covers each officer employed as a vice president or in a more senior position, and applies to incentive compensation, which includes any cash incentive award, equity award, or equity-based award paid or awarded to any covered employee during the period in which he or she was designated as a covered employee. For all covered employees, the occurrence of either of the following events is covered: (a) an action or omission by the covered employee that constituted a material violation of eBay’s code of business conduct; or (b) an action or omission by the covered employee that resulted in material financial or reputational harm to eBay. In addition, for covered employees that were employed as a senior vice president or in a more senior position, or a vice president who was a member of the finance function, the following event is also covered: a material restatement of all or a portion of eBay’s financial statements that was the result of a supervisory or other failure by the covered employee.

Under the clawback policy, the eBay Compensation Committee has the authority and discretion to determine whether an event covered by the policy had occurred and, depending on the facts and circumstances, could (but need not) require the full or partial forfeiture and/or repayment of any incentive compensation covered by the policy that was paid or awarded to a covered employee. The forfeiture and/or repayment could include all or any portion of the following:

PayPal expects that it will initially establish plans, agreements and policies regarding clawbacks for its NEOs that will be similar to those plans, agreements and policies in place at eBay for its named executive officers in conformance with all legal and regulatory requirements.

Pay Governance LLC served as the independent compensation consultant to the eBay Compensation Committee. It provided the eBay Compensation Committee with advice and resources to help the eBay Compensation Committee assess the effectiveness of eBay’s executive compensation strategy and programs. Pay Governance reported directly to the eBay Compensation Committee, and the eBay Compensation Committee had the sole power to terminate or replace Pay Governance at any time.

As part of its engagement, the eBay Compensation Committee had directed Pay Governance to work with eBay’s Senior Vice President of Human Resources and other members of management to obtain information necessary for Pay Governance to form recommendations and evaluate eBay’s management’s recommendations to the eBay Compensation Committee. Pay Governance also met with the eBay Compensation Committee during its regular meetings, in executive session (where no members of management are present), and with the eBay Compensation Committee chair and other members of the Committee outside of the Committee’s regular meetings. As part of its engagement in 2014, Pay Governance provided an environmental scan of executive compensation, evaluated eBay’s peer group composition, evaluated compensation levels at the peer group companies, assessed and proposed equity and cash compensation guidelines for various executive job levels, assessed compensation for eBay’s executive officers, assessed retention for PayPal’s NEOs, advised on the framework for eBay’s long-term incentive awards, evaluated performance-based retention strategies, evaluated clawback policies, and assessed eBay’s board compensation.

In connection with the Spin-Off, Pay Governance was retained by the eBay Compensation Committee for a special assignment to form recommendations as to the compensation structures for Mr. Schulman as the CEO-designee of PayPal and other senior executives of PayPal. In connection with this special assignment, Pay Governance also formed recommendations and evaluated management’s recommendations regarding the compensation arrangements for those individuals expected to serve as PayPal’s executive officers following the Spin-Off, and the handling of compensation transition for eBay’s plans given an expected Spin-Off date before the end of 2015. Pay Governance’s fees for consulting advice to the eBay Compensation Committee for the year ended December 31, 2014 were $548,778.77. Pay Governance did not provide any other services to eBay.

In addition, Towers Watson & Co. provided compensation advisory services to management to help it develop and execute eBay’s overall compensation programs, including evaluating competitive compensation levels and programs for PayPal’s executive officers and positions below executive officer, equity compensation, international compensation, and other issues as requested by eBay Human Resources.

To set total compensation guidelines, the eBay Compensation Committee reviews market data of companies that are comparable to eBay and that it believes compete with eBay for executive talent, business, and capital. The Committee reviews both specific data from public filings from eBay peer group companies and general industry data for comparable technology companies that are included in proprietary third-party surveys. The eBay Compensation Committee believes that it is necessary to consider this market data in making compensation decisions to attract and retain talent. The Committee also recognizes that at the executive level, eBay competes for talent against larger global companies, as well as smaller, non-public companies.

In deciding whether a company should be included in the peer group, the eBay Compensation Committee generally considered the following screening criteria: revenue, market value, historical growth rates, primary line of business, whether the company had a recognizable and well-regarded brand, and whether eBay competes with the company for talent.

For each member of the eBay peer group, one or more of the factors listed above was relevant to the reason for inclusion in the group, and, similarly, one or more of these factors may not have been relevant to the reason for inclusion in the group.

For 2014, the eBay peer group consisted of the following companies: Adobe Systems Incorporated, Amazon.com, Inc., American Express Company, Capital One Financial Corp., Charles Schwab & Co., Inc., Cisco Systems, Inc. Facebook, Inc., Google Inc., Intel Corporation, Intuit Inc., MasterCard Incorporated, Microsoft Corporation, Symantec Corporation, Visa Inc. and Yahoo! Inc. To assess whether the eBay peer group continues to reflect the markets in which eBay competes for executive talent, the eBay Compensation Committee reviews the peer group each year with the assistance of its compensation consultant. For 2014, the eBay Compensation Committee removed Dell Inc. from the list of companies used in 2013 because it had become a private company and its compensation data was no longer publicly available. For 2015, the eBay Compensation Committee did not make any changes to the peer group (as a foreign registrant, compensation data for Alibaba Group Holding Limited is not available).

Following the separation, the PayPal Compensation Committee will need to select compensation consultants and other advisors and may initially (but is not obligated to) choose to use the same consultants and advisors as those used by the eBay Compensation Committee. In addition, the PayPal peer group will be determined by the PayPal Compensation Committee. As is the case with eBay, it is expected that the PayPal Compensation Committee will set total compensation guidelines by reviewing market data of companies that are comparable to PayPal and that it believes compete with PayPal for executive talent, business, and capital.

The following table, footnotes, and narrative summarize the total compensation historically awarded to, earned by or paid to PayPal’s named executive officers, or NEOs, for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014. Position titles refer to each NEO’s expected title at PayPal following the Spin-Off.

The amount reported in the Bonus column for Mr. Dupuis represents the final installment of a supplemental cash bonus provided by eBay in connection with hiring Mr. Dupuis in 2010.

The amounts reported in the Stock Awards column represent the aggregate grant date fair value of eBay time-based restricted stock units, or RSUs, and performance-based restricted stock units, or PBRSUs, granted to each of our NEOs in 2014, calculated in accordance with the Financial Accounting Standards Board’s Accounting Standards Codification Topic 718, Compensation—Stock Compensation (“FASB ASC Topic 718”). The grant date fair value of RSUs is determined using the fair value of eBay common stock on the date of grant, and the estimated fair value of PBRSUs is calculated based on the probable outcome of the performance measures for the applicable performance period as of the date on which the PBRSUs are granted for accounting purposes. This estimated fair value for PBRSUs is different from (and lower than) the maximum value of PBRSUs set forth below.

PBRSUs: PBRSUs provide an opportunity for certain of our NEOs to receive grants of time-based RSUs if the performance measures for a specified time period are met. For a description of the performance measures for the 2014-2015 PBRSU awards, see “Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Elements of the Executive Compensation Program—PBRSU Program” above.

Assuming the highest level of performance is achieved under the applicable performance measures for the 2014-2015 PBRSU awards, the maximum possible value of the PBRSU awards allocated to our NEOs for the 2014-2015 performance period using the fair value of eBay common stock on the date that such awards were granted for accounting purposes is (a) for Mr. Schulman, $6,124,557; (b) for Mr. Dupuis, $1,155,993; (c) for Mr. Barrese, $1,965,155; and (d) for Mr. Ferguson, $1,965,155.

The value that our NEOs received in 2014 from the vesting of their eBay stock awards is reflected in the 2014 Option Exercises and Stock Vested table below. Additional information on all outstanding stock awards as of December 31, 2014 is reflected in the 2014 Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End table below.

The amounts reported in the Option Awards column represent the grant date fair value of eBay stock option awards granted to each of our NEOs in 2014, calculated in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. The estimated fair value of each eBay option award on the date of grant was calculated by using a modified Black-Scholes option pricing model. The weighted-averages of the assumptions used were: risk-free interest rate of 1.2%; expected life of 4.1 years; no dividend yield; and expected volatility of 29%. The computation of expected volatility was based on a combination of historical and market-based implied volatility from traded options on eBay common stock. The computation of expected life was determined based on historical experience of similar awards, giving consideration to the contractual terms of the stock-based awards, vesting schedules, and expectations of future employee behavior. The interest rate for periods within the contractual life of the award was based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant.

The value that our NEOs received in 2014 from the exercise of their eBay stock options is reflected in the 2014 Option Exercises and Stock Vested table below. Additional information on all outstanding option awards as of December 31, 2014 is reflected in the 2014 Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End table below.

The amounts reported in the Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation column represent amounts earned by each of our NEOs under the eBay annual cash incentive plan for services they rendered in 2014. See “Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Elements of the Executive Compensation Program—Annual Cash Incentive Awards” above for more information.

The amounts reported in the All Other Compensation column include, for each of our NEOs, the sum of:

Perquisites are valued at the incremental cost of providing such perquisites, net of any reimbursements provided by our NEOs.

The 2014 amount reported for Mr. Schulman includes $22,178,202 in “Make-Good Cash Payments” intended to make him whole for lost cash and equity awards to the extent that Mr. Schulman’s former employer caused him to forfeit or required him to repay such amounts as a result of his leaving his former employer to join PayPal:

The 2014 amount reported for Mr. Schulman also includes the following amounts to cover certain relocation benefits as outlined below:

The following table, footnotes, and narrative set forth certain information regarding grants of plan-based awards to each of our NEOs for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014.

Estimated Future Payouts Under Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards (Annual Cash Incentive Plan) (Columns (d), (e), and (f))

The amounts reported under these columns relate to the possible awards under the eBay annual cash incentive plan. For further details, see “Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Elements of the Executive Compensation Program—Annual Cash Incentive Awards” above. In 2014, the total annual target incentive amounts under the eBay annual cash incentive plan as a percentage of base salary for the NEOs were: (a) for Mr. Schulman, 175%; (b) for Mr. Dupuis, 60%; (c) for Mr. Ready, 66.67%; (d) for Mr. Barrese, 60%; and (e) for Mr. Ferguson, 60%.

The total 2014 annual target incentive amounts under the eBay annual cash incentive plan for the NEOs were allocated 75% to company (eBay) performance and 25% to individual performance. No funding occurs for the individual performance component of the eBay annual cash incentive plan unless the minimum thresholds for both FX-neutral revenue and non-GAAP net income are met; in 2014, these thresholds were met.

Actual payouts to our NEOs under the eBay annual cash incentive plan for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014 are reflected in the Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation column in the 2014 Summary Compensation Table above.

eIP - Company Performance: The amounts shown in the rows entitled “eIP – company performance” reflect estimated payouts for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014 under the annual cash incentive plan for the portion of the award payable based on company (eBay) performance, as follows:

The payout for the achievement of each of the eNPS and NPS metrics is independent from the payout tied to company financial performance (but will only be paid in a year in which the minimum thresholds for both FX neutral revenue and non-GAAP net income are met). For 2014, no payout was made for either the eNPS or NPS metric because the respective targets were not met. See “Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Elements of the Executive Compensation Program—Annual Cash Incentive Awards” above.

eIP - Individual Performance: The amounts shown in the rows entitled “eIP – individual performance” reflect estimated payouts for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014 under the annual cash incentive plan for the portion of the award payable based on individual performance, as follows:

Estimated Future Payouts Under Equity Incentive Plan Awards (PBRSUs) (Columns (g), (h), and (i))

The amounts shown reflect estimated payouts of PBRSUs for the 2014-2015 performance period, as follows:

For further discussion of the PBRSUs, including their vesting schedules, see “Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Elements of the Executive Compensation Program—Equity Incentive Awards—PBRSU Program” above.

“New hire” option grants vest over four years, with 25% vesting on the first anniversary of the date of grant and 1/48th vesting monthly thereafter. Options granted in connection with eBay’s annual (focal) grant vest over four years, with 12.5% vesting on the six-month anniversary of the date of grant and 1/48th vesting monthly thereafter. The exercise price of options is the closing price of eBay common stock on the date of grant.

The fair value of each option and RSU award was calculated using the fair value of eBay common stock on the date of grant. The estimated fair value of PBRSUs was calculated based on the probable outcome of the performance measures for the 2014-2015 performance period as of the date on which those PBRSUs were granted for accounting purposes. The estimated fair value of each eBay option award on the date of grant was calculated by using a modified Black-Scholes option pricing model. The weighted-averages of the assumptions used during 2014 were: risk-free interest rate of 1.2%; expected life of 4.1 years; no dividend yield; and expected volatility of 29%. The computation of expected volatility was based on a combination of historical and market-based implied volatility from traded options on eBay common stock. The computation of expected life was determined based on historical experience of similar awards, giving consideration to the contractual terms of the stock-based awards, vesting schedules, and expectations of future employee behavior. The interest rate for periods within the contractual life of the award was based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant.

The following table and footnotes set forth certain information regarding outstanding equity awards for each of our NEOs as of December 31, 2014.

The following table and footnotes set forth the number of shares acquired and the value realized upon the exercise of eBay stock options and the vesting of eBay stock awards by each of our NEOs for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014.

The following table and footnotes sets forth information concerning contributions, earnings, and withdrawals/distributions during 2014 under eBay’s nonqualified deferred compensation plans for each of our NEOs.

The following table, footnotes, and narrative set forth our payment obligations pursuant to the compensation arrangements for each of our NEOs, under the circumstances described below, assuming that their employment was terminated or a change in control occurred on December 31, 2014.

Severance Arrangements for Involuntary Termination Other than for Cause for Mr. Schulman

Mr. Schulman entered into an offer letter (the “Schulman Offer Letter”) in connection with becoming President and CEO-designee of PayPal in September 2014. Under the terms of the Schulman Offer Letter, Mr. Schulman would be entitled to the following if his employment was terminated by eBay without “cause” or if he resigned for “good reason” as of December 31, 2014 and his termination date occurred more than 90 days prior to or more than 24 months following a “change in control” (as defined in the eBay Inc. 2008 Equity Incentive Award Plan, as amended and restated, or the eBay Plan):

For discussion of Mr. Schulman’s severance arrangements in the event of his termination of employment without “cause” or resignation for “good reason” at or following the Spin-Off, see “Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Severance and Change-in-Control Arrangements with Executive Officers, and Clawbacks—Severance and Change-in-Control Arrangements for Mr. Schulman” above.

Severance Arrangements for an Involuntary Termination Other than for Cause for Mr. Dupuis

In December 2014, eBay modified Mr. Dupuis’ August 2014 retention arrangement to provide that Mr. Dupuis would be entitled to certain cash payments upon his separation date if he remained employed by PayPal through an agreed upon date no longer than 30 days after the date a new chief financial officer was appointed at PayPal. Under the terms of the arrangement, if Mr. Dupuis’ separation date occurred on December 31, 2014 and assuming the foregoing conditions were met, Mr. Dupuis would be entitled to receive the following.

Severance Arrangements for an Involuntary Termination Other than for Cause for Mr. Ready

Severance Arrangements for an Involuntary Termination in Connection with a Change in Control for Mr. Schulman

Under the terms of the Schulman Offer Letter, Mr. Schulman would be entitled to receive the following if a “change in control” (as defined in the eBay Plan) occurred as of December 31, 2014 and his employment was terminated by eBay without “cause” or he resigned for “good reason”:

For discussion of Mr. Schulman’s severance arrangements in the event of his termination of employment without “cause” or resignation for “good reason” in connection with a “change in control” following the Spin-Off or where the Spin-Off has not occurred by the second anniversary of his start date, see “Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Severance and Change-in-Control Arrangements with Executive Officers, and Clawbacks—Severance and Change-in-Control Arrangements for Mr. Schulman” above.

The amounts reported in the Change-in-Control column assume that, in a change-in-control transaction, the acquiring entity would assume or continue outstanding equity awards. If the acquiring entity does not assume or continue any outstanding equity awards and all the unvested and outstanding awards are fully accelerated upon a change in control, the aggregate value of accelerated vesting of such awards to each of the NEOs as of December 31, 2014, calculated based on the closing price of eBay common stock on December 31, 2014, would be as follows: (a) for Mr. Schulman, $9,646,744; (b) for Mr. Dupuis, $5,401,358; (c) for Mr. Ready, $39,218,901; (d) for Mr. Barrese, $8,326,339; and (e) for Mr. Ferguson, $8,380,554.

The Committee has determined that the Spin-Off will not constitute a Change in Control for purposes of these protections and therefore these benefits will not be available solely as a result of the execution of the Spin-Off.

Severance Arrangements in the Event of Death or Disability for Mr. Schulman

Under the terms of the Schulman Offer Letter, if Mr. Schulman’s employment terminates due to his death or permanent disability, he will be entitled to receive within 30 days of his termination date a cash payment equal to the value of any unvested equity awards that would have otherwise vested within 24 months of his termination date.

The following is a summary of the key provisions of the 2015 Equity Incentive Award Plan (the “2015 Plan”), which was adopted by PayPal on June 16, 2015 and will be effective as of immediately prior to the effective time. This summary is qualified in its entirety by reference to the full text of the 2015 Plan. The PayPal equity-based compensation awards into which the eBay equity-based compensation awards are converted upon the separation (see Treatment of eBay Awards held by PayPal Employees) will be issued pursuant to the 2015 Plan (the “Assumed Awards”).

The Compensation Committee has the exclusive authority to administer the 2015 Plan, including the power to determine eligibility, the types and sizes of awards, the price and timing of awards, the acceleration or waiver of any vesting restriction, and the authority to delegate such administrative responsibilities.

The Compensation Committee may delegate to a committee of one or more of our directors or one or more of our officers the authority to grant or amend awards to participants other than our senior executives who are subject to Section 16 of the Exchange Act or employees who are “covered employees” within the meaning of Section 162(m) of the Code. Unless otherwise determined by the Board, the Compensation Committee will consist solely of two or more members of the Board, each of whom is an “outside director” within the meaning of Section 162(m) of the Code, a non-employee director, and an “independent director” under the rules of the Nasdaq Global Select Market (or other principal securities market on which shares of our common stock are traded).

Employees of PayPal and its subsidiaries and affiliates, and consultants and non-employee members of our Board as determined by the Compensation Committee are eligible to participate in the 2015 Plan.

The number of shares of common stock authorized for issuance pursuant to the 2015 Plan is 108,000,000 (which includes the aggregate number of shares subject to the Assumed Awards). The shares of common stock covered by the 2015 Plan may be treasury shares, authorized but unissued shares, or shares purchased in the open market.

The 2015 Plan counts awards against the available plan reserve based on ratios tied to the expected value of the award, with full value awards counting as one 1 share for each share granted, and options and stock appreciation rights counting as 0.4123 shares for each option and stock appreciation right granted. This 0.4123 ratio equates to approximately one full value award equaling 2.43 options. “Full value awards” are defined as awards denominated in shares of our common stock, other than stock options and stock appreciation rights.

To the extent an award granted under the 2015 Plan terminates, expires, or lapses for any reason or is settled in cash without delivery of shares to the participant, any shares subject to that award may be used again for new grants under the 2015 Plan, pursuant to the terms of the 2015 Plan. However, any shares that are tendered or withheld to satisfy the grant, exercise price, or tax withholding obligation pursuant to any award may not be used again for new grants under the 2015 Plan. To the extent permitted by applicable law or any exchange rule, shares issued in the assumption of, or in the substitution for, any outstanding awards of any entity acquired in any form of combination by us or any of our subsidiaries or affiliates will not be counted against shares available for issuance under the 2015 Plan. The payment of cash dividend equivalents in conjunction with outstanding awards will not be counted against the shares available for issuance under the 2015 Plan.

The maximum number of shares of our common stock that may be subject to one or more awards (other than Assumed Awards) granted to any one participant pursuant to the 2015 Plan during any calendar year is two million shares, and the maximum amount that may be paid in cash to a “covered employee” during any calendar year with respect to any performance bonus award (other than Assumed Awards) is $3 million.

The 2015 Plan provides for the grant of incentive stock options, nonqualified stock options, restricted stock, restricted stock units (“RSUs”), performance-based restricted stock units (“PBRSUs”), stock appreciation rights, performance shares, performance stock units, dividend equivalents, stock payments, deferred stock units (“DSUs”), other stock-based awards, and performance-bonus awards. No determination has been made as to the types or amounts of awards that will be granted in the future to specific individuals pursuant to the 2015 Plan.

Stock Options. Stock options, including incentive stock options as defined under Section 422 of the Code, and nonqualified stock options, may be granted pursuant to the 2015 Plan. The option exercise price of all stock options granted pursuant to the 2015 Plan will not be less than 100% of the fair market value of our common stock on the date of grant. Stock options may be exercised as determined by the Compensation Committee, but in no event may a stock option have a term extending beyond ten years from the date of grant.

Although we do not currently intend to grant any incentive stock options, to preserve maximum flexibility, the 2015 Plan allows us to grant incentive stock options. Incentive stock options granted to any person who owns, as of the date of grant, stock possessing more than ten percent of the total combined voting power of all classes of our stock, however, shall have an exercise price that is not less than 110% of the fair market value of the common stock on the date of grant and may not have a term extending beyond the fifth anniversary of the date of grant. The aggregate fair market value of the shares with respect to which options intended to be incentive stock options are exercisable for the first time by an employee in any calendar year may not exceed $100,000, or such other amount as the Code provides.

The Compensation Committee determines the methods by which an option holder may pay the exercise price of an option and the related taxes, including, without limitation: (1) cash, (2) shares of common stock (including, in the case of payment of the exercise price of an award, shares of stock issuable pursuant to the exercise of the award) having a fair market value on the date of delivery equal to the aggregate payments required, or (3) other property acceptable to the Compensation Committee (including through the delivery of a notice that the award holder has placed a market sell order with a broker with respect to shares of common stock then issuable upon exercise or vesting of an award, and that the broker has been directed to pay a sufficient portion of the net proceeds of the sale to us in satisfaction of the aggregate payments required; provided that payment of such proceeds is then made to us upon settlement of that sale). However, no participant who is a member of the Board or an “executive officer” of PayPal within the meaning of Section 13(k) of the Exchange Act will be permitted to pay the exercise price of an option in any method which would violate the prohibitions on loans made or arranged by us as set forth in Section 13(k) of the Exchange Act.

Time-Based Restricted Stock Units. RSUs may be granted pursuant to the 2015 Plan. An RSU award provides for the issuance of common stock at a future date subject to continuing employment as set forth in the applicable award agreement. The vesting and maturity dates will be established at the time of grant and may provide for the deferral of receipt of the common stock beyond the vesting date. On the maturity date, we will transfer to the participant one unrestricted, fully transferable share of common stock for each RSU scheduled to be paid out on such date and not previously forfeited (subject to applicable tax withholding requirements).

Performance-Based Restricted Stock Units. PBRSUs may be granted pursuant to the 2015 Plan. A PBRSU award provides for the issuance of common stock at a future date upon the satisfaction of specific performance conditions as set forth in the applicable award agreement. The vesting and maturity dates will be established at the time of grant and may provide for the deferral of receipt of the common stock beyond the vesting date. On the

maturity date, we will transfer to the participant one unrestricted, fully transferable share of common stock for each PBRSU scheduled to be paid out on such date and not previously forfeited (subject to applicable tax withholding requirements).

Restricted Stock. Restricted stock may be granted pursuant to the 2015 Plan. A restricted stock award is the grant of shares of common stock at a price determined by the Compensation Committee (including zero), that is nontransferable and may be subject to substantial risk of forfeiture until specific conditions are met. Conditions may be based on continuing employment or achieving performance goals. During the period of restriction, participants holding shares of restricted stock may have full voting and dividend rights with respect to such shares. The restrictions will lapse in accordance with a schedule or other conditions determined by the Compensation Committee.

Performance Bonus Awards. Performance bonus awards may be granted pursuant to the 2015 Plan. Performance bonus awards are cash bonuses payable upon the attainment of pre-established performance goals based on established performance criteria and are intended to be performance-based awards within the meaning of Section 162(m) of the Code. The goals are established and evaluated by the Compensation Committee and may relate to performance over any periods as determined by the Compensation Committee.

Performance-Based Awards. The following is a brief discussion of the requirements for awards, including performance bonus awards, to be treated as performance-based awards within the meaning of Section 162(m) of the Code.

The Compensation Committee may grant awards to employees who are or may be “covered employees,” as defined in Section 162(m) of the Code, that are intended to be performance-based awards within the meaning of Section 162(m) of the Code in order to preserve the deductibility of these awards for federal income tax purposes. Under the 2015 Plan, these performance-based awards may be either equity awards or performance bonus awards. Participants are entitled to receive payment for a performance-based award for any given performance period only to the extent that pre-established performance goals set by the Compensation Committee for the period are satisfied.

These pre-established performance goals are based on one or more of the following types of performance criteria:

Any of the above criteria may be measured with respect to us, or any subsidiary, affiliate, or other business unit of ours, either in absolute terms, terms of growth, or as compared to any incremental increase, as compared to results of a peer group and either in accordance with, or not in accordance with, GAAP. The Compensation Committee defines in an objective fashion the manner of calculating the performance criteria it selects to use for such awards, and may in its discretion provide that one or more objectively determinable adjustments shall be made to one or more of the performance criteria. With regard to a particular performance period, the Compensation Committee will have the discretion to select the length of the performance period, the type of performance-based awards to be granted, and the goals that will be used to measure the performance for the period. In determining the actual size of an individual performance-based award for a performance period, the Compensation Committee may reduce or eliminate (but not increase) the initial award. Performance-based awards are subject to the annual per-person limits described above in “Limitation on Awards and Shares Available.” Unless otherwise provided in an award agreement, a participant will have to be employed by or providing services to PayPal on the date the performance-based award is paid to be eligible for a performance-based award for any period.

Except for adjustments described below in “Adjustment Provisions,” the Committee will not, without stockholder approval, authorize the amendment of any outstanding award to reduce its purchase price per share, the replacement or substitution of any award for an award having a lesser purchase price per share, or an offer to purchase any previously granted option or stock appreciation right for a payment in cash.

Subject to the acceleration of vesting as permitted under the terms of the 2015 Plan or the applicable award agreement, including upon a change in control, full value awards (i.e. stock awards other than stock options and stock appreciation rights) that are granted to employees or consultants will become vested on one or more vesting dates over a period of at least three years (or, in the case of performance-based awards, a performance period of at least one year), except that the following awards may be granted without regard to this minimum vesting requirement: (i) awards that result in the issuance to one or more participants of up to 5% of the aggregate number of shares available under the 2015 Plan; (ii) awards granted to independent directors in lieu of cash retainers; and (iii) awards granted to participants who are subject to laws or regulations imposing certain requirements or restrictions on the compensation of such participants. Such minimum vesting requirements do not apply to the Assumed Awards.

Certain transactions with our stockholders not involving our receipt of consideration, such as a stock split, spin-off, stock dividend, or certain recapitalizations, may affect the share price of our common stock (which transactions are referred to collectively as “equity restructurings”). In the event that an equity restructuring occurs, the Compensation Committee will equitably adjust the class of shares issuable and the maximum number of shares of our stock subject to the 2015 Plan, as well as the maximum number of shares that may be issued to an employee during any calendar year, and will equitably adjust outstanding awards as to the class, number of shares, and price per share of our stock. Other types of transactions may also affect our common stock, such as a dividend or other distribution, reorganization, merger, or other changes in corporate structure. In the event that there is such a transaction, which is not an equity restructuring, and the Compensation Committee determines that an adjustment to the 2015 Plan and any outstanding awards would be appropriate to prevent any dilution or

enlargement of benefits under the 2015 Plan, the Compensation Committee will equitably adjust the 2015 Plan as to the class of shares issuable and the maximum number of shares of our stock subject to the 2015 Plan, as well as the maximum number of shares that may be issued to an employee during any calendar year, and will adjust any outstanding awards as to the class, number of shares, and price per share of our stock in such manner as it may deem equitable.

Outstanding awards do not automatically terminate in the event of a change in control. A “change in control” generally means a transaction in which any person or group acquires more than 50% of our voting securities, a change in a majority of the Board over a two-year period that is not approved by at least two-thirds of the incumbent Board members, a sale or other disposition of all or substantially all of our assets, a merger or consolidation in which we are not the surviving corporation, or a reverse merger in which we are the surviving corporation but the shares of our stock outstanding immediately preceding the merger are converted by virtue of the merger into other property or a liquidation or dissolution of PayPal. In the event of a change in control, any surviving corporation or acquiring corporation must either assume or continue outstanding awards or substitute similar awards. If it does not do so, then with respect to awards held by participants whose service has not terminated, the vesting of such awards (and, if applicable, the time during which such awards may be exercised) will be accelerated in full and all forfeiture restrictions on such awards shall lapse. The unexercised portion of all outstanding awards may terminate upon the change in control.

The Compensation Committee, subject to approval of the Board, may terminate, amend, or modify the 2015 Plan at any time; however, stockholder approval will be obtained for any amendment (1) to the extent necessary and desirable to comply with any applicable law, regulation, or stock exchange rule, (2) to increase the number of shares available under the 2015 Plan, (3) to permit the Compensation Committee or the Board to grant options with a price below fair market value on the date of grant, or (4) to extend the exercise period for an option beyond ten years from the date of grant. In addition, absent stockholder approval, no option may be amended to reduce the per share exercise price of the shares subject to such option below the per share exercise price as of the date the option was granted and, except to the extent permitted by the 2015 Plan in connection with certain changes in capital structure, no option may be granted in exchange for, or in connection with, the cancellation or surrender of an option having a higher per share exercise price.

In no event may an award be granted pursuant to the 2015 Plan on or after the tenth anniversary of its effective date (i.e., the date PayPal’s stockholders approve the 2015 Plan).

The following is a general summary under current law of the material federal income tax consequences to participants in the 2015 Plan. This summary deals with the general tax principles that apply and is provided only for general information. Certain types of taxes, such as state and local income taxes, are not discussed. Tax laws are complex and subject to change and may vary depending on individual circumstances and from locality to locality. The summary does not discuss all aspects of income taxation that may be relevant to a participant in light of his or her personal circumstances. This summarized tax information is not tax advice.

With respect to nonqualified stock options, we are generally entitled to deduct and the optionee recognizes taxable income in an amount equal to the excess of the fair market value of the purchased shares at the time of exercise over the option exercise price. A participant receiving incentive stock options will not recognize taxable income upon grant or at the time of exercise. However, the excess of the fair market value of the common stock received over the option exercise price is an item of tax preference income potentially subject to the alternative minimum tax. If stock acquired upon exercise of an incentive stock option is held for a minimum of two years

from the date of grant and one year from the date of exercise, the gain or loss (in an amount equal to the difference between the fair market value on the date of sale and the exercise price) upon disposition of the stock will be treated as a long-term capital gain or loss, and we will not be entitled to any deduction. If the holding period requirements are not met, the incentive stock option will be treated as one that does not meet the requirements of the Code for incentive stock options, and in the year of the disposition the participant will recognize compensation taxable as ordinary income in an amount equal to the lesser of (1) the actual gain realized upon the disposition (i.e., the sale price minus the exercise price) or (2) the fair market value of the shares on the date of exercise over the exercise price, and we generally will be entitled to a corresponding deduction.

The current U.S. federal income tax consequences of other awards authorized under the 2015 Plan generally follow certain basic patterns: stock appreciation rights are taxed and deductible in substantially the same manner as nonqualified stock options; nontransferable restricted stock subject to a substantial risk of forfeiture results in income recognition equal to the excess of the fair market value of the shares over the price paid, if any, only at the time the restrictions lapse (unless the recipient elects to accelerate recognition as of the date of grant); and RSUs, stock-based performance awards, dividend equivalents and other types of awards are generally subject to tax at the time of payment. Compensation otherwise effectively deferred is taxed when paid. In each of the foregoing cases, we will generally have a corresponding deduction at the time the participant recognizes income, subject to Section 162(m) of the Code with respect to covered employees.

Section 162(m) of the Code denies a deduction to any publicly held corporation for compensation paid to certain “covered employees” in a taxable year to the extent that compensation to such covered employee exceeds $1 million. Certain kinds of compensation, including qualified “performance-based compensation,” are disregarded for purposes of the deduction limitation. In accordance with U.S. Treasury Regulations issued under Section 162(m), compensation attributable to stock awards will generally qualify as performance-based compensation if (1) the award is granted by a compensation committee composed solely of two or more “outside directors,” (2) the plan contains a per-employee limitation on the number of awards that may be granted during a specified period, (3) the plan is approved by the stockholders, and (4) under the terms of the award, the amount of compensation an employee could receive is based solely on an increase in the value of the stock after the date of the grant (which requires that the exercise price of the option is not less than the fair market value of the stock on the date of grant), and for awards other than options and stock appreciation rights, established performance criteria that must be met before the award actually will vest or be paid.

The 2015 Plan is intended to meet the requirements of Section 162(m) of the Code; however, full value awards granted under the 2015 Plan will be treated as qualified performance-based compensation under Section 162(m) only if the full value awards and the procedures associated with them comply with all other requirements of Section 162(m) of the Code. It is possible that compensation attributable to awards under the 2015 Plan, including the Assumed Awards, when combined with all other types of compensation received by a covered employee from us, may cause this limitation to be exceeded in any particular year. We cannot assure you that compensation attributable to options, full value awards and the Assumed Awards issued under the 2015 Plan will be treated as qualified performance-based compensation under Section 162(m) of the Code and thus be deductible to us.

The tax consequences for equity awards outside of the U.S. may differ from the U.S. federal income tax consequences described above.

The following is a summary of the key provisions of the PayPal Employee Incentive Plan (the “Incentive Plan”) which was adopted by PayPal on June 16, 2015 and will be effective as of immediately prior to the effective time. This summary is qualified in its entirety by reference to the full text of the Incentive Plan.

PayPal employees who were eligible to participate in the eBay Incentive Plan immediately prior to the effective time will be eligible to participate in the Incentive Plan as of the effective time in accordance with the employee matters agreement. Under the employee matters agreement, PayPal will assume all obligations with respect to incentive awards for performance periods that are pending at the time of the separation, with changes, if any, to the performance goals that were applicable to the incentive awards under the eBay Incentive Plan as may be necessary in order to reflect the PayPal business after the separation.

The Compensation Committee is responsible for administering the Incentive Plan. The members of the Compensation Committee (or the sub-committee selected to administer the Incentive Plan) must qualify as “outside directors” under Section 162(m) of the Code in order for incentive awards to “covered employees” to qualify as deductible “performance-based compensation” under the Code. The Compensation Committee has complete and absolute authority to make decisions regarding the administration of the Incentive Plan, including interpreting the terms and provisions, and establishing, adjusting, or paying incentive awards. Under the Incentive Plan, no participant may receive an award of more than $8,000,000 (or the equivalent amount of equity, based on fair market value on the date of grant) in any calendar year.

All active regular full-time and part-time employees of PayPal after the effective time who are notified by us are eligible to participate in the Incentive Plan. Employees who participate in other bonus programs, such as any sales incentive plan, are not eligible to participate in the Incentive Plan unless they are specifically made eligible in writing by one of our executive officers. In addition, we may, in our sole discretion, provide for a payout under the Incentive Plan for any employee who has changed positions and, as a result, may have been eligible to participate in the Incentive Plan and another bonus program during a given performance period. The Incentive Plan contains special provisions for designating additional eligible employees (e.g., new hires) for participation in the Incentive Plan. In addition, in connection with the separation and pursuant to the terms of the employee matters agreement, each employee of PayPal who was participating in the eBay Incentive Plan as of the effective date of the Incentive Plan shall be eligible to participate in the Incentive Plan of such effective date.

Under the Incentive Plan, the Compensation Committee will determine the performance period for measuring actual performance. The Compensation Committee will establish for each performance period (1) the performance measures based on business criteria and target levels of performance; and (2) a formula for calculating a participant’s award based on actual performance compared to the pre-established performance goals.

Performance measures are based on one or more of the following types of performance criteria:

Any of the above criteria may be measured with respect to us, or any subsidiary, affiliate or other business unit of ours, either in absolute terms, terms of growth or as compared to any incremental increase, as compared to results of a peer group and either in accordance with, or not in accordance with, generally accepted accounting principles, or GAAP. The Compensation Committee defines in an objective fashion the manner of calculating the performance criteria it selects to use for such awards.

The Compensation Committee may set performance periods and performance goals that differ from participant to participant. This may include designating performance goals on either company-wide or business unit performance, as appropriate for a participant’s specific responsibilities.

As soon as practicable after the end of each performance period, the Compensation Committee will certify in writing (which may include minutes of a compensation committee meeting) whether the stated performance goals have been met and will determine the amount of the incentive award to be paid to each Incentive Plan participant. The Compensation Committee may decrease (but cannot increase) an incentive award paid to a covered employee. In determining that amount, the Compensation Committee will consider the established target bonuses, the degree to which the established standards were satisfied and any other objective or subjective factors it deems appropriate and may reduce the amount of, or eliminate altogether, any incentive award that would otherwise be payable.

Following the Compensation Committee’s determination of incentive awards to be paid, those incentive awards will generally be paid in cash (subject to any election made by an eligible employee to defer all or a portion of the incentive award, if permitted to do so) or equity pursuant to a PayPal equity-based award plan under which securities have been registered on Form S-8 Registration Statement.

Any incentive awards paid under the Incentive Plan are subject to forfeiture, recovery, or other action by PayPal as necessary for compliance with any company policy or as required by law.

The Compensation Committee may amend or terminate the Incentive Plan at any time and for any reason. If appropriate to maintain the Incentive Plan’s qualification under Section 162(m) of the Code, material amendments of the Incentive Plan will be conditioned on stockholder approval.

The Incentive Plan is intended to meet the requirements of Section 162(m) of the Code; however, it is possible that compensation attributable to awards under the Incentive Plan, including awards for performance periods that are pending at the time of the separation, when combined with all other types of compensation received by a covered employee from us, may cause the $1 million deduction limitation for certain compensation that is not “performance-based compensation” under Section 162(m) of the Code to be exceeded in any particular year. Consequently, we cannot assure that compensation attributable to awards issued under the Incentive Plan will be treated as qualified performance-based compensation under Section 162(m) of the Code and thus be deductible to us.

Following the separation and distribution, PayPal and eBay will operate separately, each as an independent public company. PayPal has entered into a separation and distribution agreement with eBay, which is referred to in this information statement as the “separation agreement” or the “separation and distribution agreement.” In connection with the separation, PayPal will also enter into various other agreements to effect the separation and provide a framework for its relationship with eBay after the separation, such as an operating agreement, a transition services agreement, a tax matters agreement, an employee matters agreement, an intellectual property matters agreement, colocation services agreements, a data sharing addendum and a product development agreement. These agreements will provide for the allocation between PayPal and eBay of eBay’s assets, employees, liabilities and obligations (including its investments, property and employee benefits and tax liabilities) attributable to periods prior to, at and after PayPal’s separation from eBay and will govern certain relationships between PayPal and eBay after the separation. The material agreements listed above, or forms of such agreements, will be filed as exhibits to the registration statement on Form 10 of which this information statement is a part.

The summaries of each of the agreements listed above are qualified in their entireties by reference to the full text of the applicable agreements, which are incorporated by reference into this information statement. When used in this section, “distribution date” refers to the date on which eBay distributes PayPal’s common stock to the holders of eBay common stock.

The separation and distribution agreement will identify the assets to be transferred, the liabilities to be assumed and the contracts to be assigned to each of PayPal and eBay as part of the separation of eBay into two companies, and it provides for when and how these transfers, assumptions and assignments will occur. In particular, the separation and distribution agreement will provide, among other things, that subject to the terms and conditions contained therein:

Except as expressly set forth in the separation and distribution agreement or any ancillary agreement, neither eBay nor PayPal will make any representation or warranty as to the assets, business or liabilities transferred or assumed as part of the separation, as to any approvals or notifications required in connection with the transfers, as to the value of or the freedom from any security interests of any of the assets transferred, as to the absence or presence of any defenses or right of setoff or freedom from counterclaim with respect to any claim or other asset of either PayPal or eBay, or as to the legal sufficiency of any assignment, document or instrument delivered to convey title to any asset or thing of value to be transferred in connection with the separation. All assets will be transferred on an “as is,” “where is” basis and, subject to the provisions of the separation and distribution agreement described under “Further Assurances” below, the respective transferees will bear the economic and legal risks that any conveyance will prove to be insufficient to vest in the transferee good and marketable title, free and clear of all security interests, and that any necessary consents or governmental approvals are not obtained or that any requirements of laws, agreements, security interests, or judgments are not complied with.

Information in this information statement with respect to the assets and liabilities of the parties following the distribution is presented based on the allocation of such assets and liabilities pursuant to the separation and distribution agreement, unless the context otherwise requires. The separation and distribution agreement will provide that, in the event that the transfer or assignment of certain assets and liabilities to PayPal or eBay, as applicable, does not occur prior to the separation, then until such assets or liabilities are able to be transferred or assigned, PayPal or eBay, as applicable, will hold such assets on behalf and for the benefit of the other party and will pay, perform, and discharge such liabilities, for which the other party will reimburse PayPal or eBay, as applicable, for all commercially reasonable payments made in connection with the performance and discharge of such liabilities.

The separation and distribution agreement will also govern the rights and obligations of the parties regarding the distribution following the completion of the separation. On the distribution date, eBay will distribute to its stockholders that hold eBay common stock as of the record date for the distribution all of the issued and outstanding shares of PayPal’s common stock on a pro rata basis. Stockholders will receive cash in lieu of any fractional shares.

The separation and distribution agreement will provide that the distribution is subject to satisfaction (or waiver by eBay) of certain conditions described under “The Separation and Distribution—Conditions to the

Distribution.” eBay has the sole and absolute discretion to determine (and change) the terms of, and to determine whether to proceed with, the distribution and, to the extent it determines to so proceed, to determine the record date for the distribution, the distribution date and the distribution ratio. eBay may delay or rescind its declaration of the distribution even after the record date for the distribution, as discussed in more detail under “Risk Factors—Risks Related to the Separation—The distribution of PayPal common stock may be delayed or rescinded if certain required regulatory approvals are not obtained.”

The separation and distribution agreement will provide that all intercompany receivables and payables as to which there are no third parties and that are between PayPal or a PayPal subsidiary, on the one hand, and eBay or an eBay subsidiary, on the other hand, other than accounts related to the agreements to be entered into in connection with the separation and post-separation agreements between eBay and PayPal and other than any accrued liabilities incurred in connection with providing the services that will be memorialized by the operating agreement, in each case existing as of immediately prior to the completion of the separation, will be settled, capitalized, cancelled, assigned, or assumed by PayPal or one or more PayPal subsidiaries.

The separation and distribution agreement will provide that prior to the distribution date, eBay will transfer, or cause its subsidiaries to transfer, an aggregate amount of $3.8 billion of cash to PayPal (including through one or more capital contributions).

In general, each party to the separation and distribution agreement will assume liability for all pending, threatened and unasserted legal matters related to its own business or its assumed or retained liabilities and will indemnify the other party for any liability to the extent arising out of or resulting from such assumed or retained legal matters.

In the separation and distribution agreement, PayPal will agree to indemnify, defend and hold harmless eBay, each of its affiliates and each of their respective directors, officers and employees, from and against all liabilities relating to, arising out of or resulting from:

eBay agrees to indemnify, defend and hold harmless PayPal, each of its affiliates and each of its respective directors, officers and employees from and against all liabilities relating to, arising out of or resulting from:

The separation and distribution agreement will also establish procedures with respect to claims subject to indemnification and related matters.

The separation and distribution agreement will provide for the allocation between the parties of rights and obligations under existing insurance policies with respect to occurrences prior to the distribution and sets forth procedures for the administration of insured claims.

In addition to the actions specifically provided for in the separation and distribution agreement, except as otherwise set forth therein or in any ancillary agreement, both PayPal and eBay will agree in the separation and distribution agreement to use reasonable best efforts, prior to, on and after the distribution date, to take, or cause to be taken, all actions, and to do, or cause to be done, all things necessary, proper or advisable under applicable laws, regulations and agreements to consummate and make effective the transactions contemplated by the separation and distribution agreement and the ancillary agreements.

The separation and distribution agreement will contain provisions that govern, except as otherwise provided in any ancillary agreement, the resolution of disputes, controversies or claims that may arise between PayPal and eBay related to the separation or distribution. These provisions will contemplate that efforts will generally be made to resolve disputes, controversies and claims by escalation of the matter to executives of PayPal and eBay, then to a committee comprised of executives and directors of PayPal and eBay and then to non-binding mediation before PayPal or eBay may initiate adversarial proceedings.

Except as expressly set forth in the separation and distribution agreement or in any ancillary agreement, all costs and expenses incurred in connection with the separation and distribution incurred prior to the distribution date, including costs and expenses relating to legal and tax counsel, financial advisors and accounting advisory work related to the separation and distribution, will be paid by the party incurring such cost and expense.

Other matters that will be governed by the separation and distribution agreement include access to financial and other information, confidentiality, access to and provision of records and treatment of outstanding guarantees and similar credit support.

The separation and distribution agreement will provide that it may be terminated, and the separation and distribution may be modified or abandoned, at any time prior to the distribution date in the sole discretion of eBay without the approval of any person, including PayPal’s or eBay stockholders. In the event of a termination of the separation and distribution agreement, no party, nor any of its directors, officers, or employees, will have any liability of any kind to the other party or any other person. After the distribution date, the separation and distribution agreement may not be terminated except by an agreement in writing signed by both PayPal and eBay.

PayPal and eBay will enter into an operating agreement that governs certain aspects of the relationship between the parties following the separation and distribution, including certain terms and conditions relating to PayPal’s provision of payment processing and credit services, and other related services, to customers on eBay.com and other core eBay Marketplaces properties (including mobile applications). The agreement will not address PayPal’s provision of services through eBay’s other properties existing at the effective time of the distribution, such as StubHub, eBay Enterprise, Magento, Classifieds, Shopping.com, Gmarket, or Half.com, and except in certain circumstances, will not cover properties acquired or created by eBay after the effective time of the distribution. The operating agreement will be non-exclusive and will not prevent eBay from contracting with third parties for the provision of comparable or unrelated services.

The operating agreement will require PayPal to use reasonable best efforts to offer comparable eBay merchants (determined on an aggregate or average basis) pricing for PayPal’s payment processing services comparable to the pricing PayPal offers to non-eBay merchants for comparable services. Characteristics used to determine comparability may include some or all of: the mix of PayPal product(s) used by the customer, the geographic market in which the customer is located, the customer’s industry, the nature of the customer’s business, the total volume of transactions (by PayPal product), the average size of the customer’s transactions, and whether pricing for the PayPal product used by the merchant is variable or fixed. It is expected that the PayPal rates for eBay merchants will therefore remain largely consistent with today’s pricing relationship. On an annual basis, the parties will retain a third party independent auditor to conduct a market check on a jurisdiction-by-jurisdiction basis to ensure that eBay merchants are receiving pricing as required under the agreement. If the market check determines that pricing for eBay merchants in a jurisdiction is higher than what is specified in the operating agreement, then PayPal will be required to adjust its pricing for the remainder of the term of the agreement, and eBay and PayPal will cooperate in good faith to mutually agree on a remedy (such as a refund or discount) for any affected eBay merchants.

In addition, in certain jurisdictions and subject to certain exceptions, the agreement imposes certain obligations if PayPal offers to non-eBay merchants who use or access PayPal’s services through websites or applications (including mobile) operated by certain competitive platform operators of eBay (as specified in the operating agreement) (a) overall economic terms that are more favorable than the terms currently offered to eBay merchants in the same jurisdiction or (b) any non-economic term that is not offered to eBay merchants in the same jurisdiction, except for any such non-economic term that is exclusive to that competitive platform operator. In either of these circumstances, PayPal will be required to offer the applicable economic or non-economic term, together with the relevant terms and conditions, to eBay for the benefit of the eBay merchants in that jurisdiction,

and eBay will have an opportunity to accept these terms. If eBay accepts the terms offered by PayPal, eBay and the eBay merchants will be entitled to the benefit of such terms so long as eBay also complies with the related conditions (other than certain specified conditions with which eBay or eBay merchants are not reasonably capable of complying).

During the term of the operating agreement, PayPal will make certain payments to eBay based on certain referral services by eBay that have benefitted PayPal in the past and that the companies intend to continue following the separation and distribution. Subject to the Penetration Rate (as defined below) remaining above 60% at the beginning of each quarter, PayPal will pay a referral services fee to eBay (calculated quarterly and paid annually) in an amount to be specified in the operating agreement. It is anticipated that the number of new PayPal users who are introduced through the eBay platform will remain consistent with current experience. If the number of new users introduced to PayPal in this manner increases or decreases from the expected rate, the parties will adjust the referral services fee accordingly. In addition, PayPal will make a payment (calculated quarterly and paid annually) to eBay based on the use of PayPal Credit by eBay consumers and merchants on eBay properties equal to 0.30% of the Net TPV attributable to such transactions.

PayPal and/or eBay will also make certain payments to each other based on the usage of PayPal’s payment services by eBay consumers and merchants on the core eBay Marketplaces platform. These payments are intended to provide an incentive to eBay to support the continued use of PayPal as a payment service on the core eBay Marketplaces platform (referred to as the “Penetration Rate”) at current levels and to reward eBay if the Penetration Rate increases. The Penetration Rate will generally be calculated as the portion of eBay’s Core GMV processed by PayPal but will exclude off platform properties, vehicles and real estate transactions worldwide, domestic trade in China and Latin America and transactions in which the seller’s eBay account location is in Russia or India.

The agreement will provide for a baseline Penetration Rate of 80% (the “Baseline Rate”), which is approximately equal to the current Penetration Rate prior to the separation and distribution. The Baseline Rate will be adjusted annually to account for the impact of foreign currency exchange rates. The payments will be determined as follows:

The payments described above will be made annually based on the sum of the calculated quarterly amounts. The agreement also provides that, for those PayPal products made available on the eBay platform, in the event that PayPal’s TPV for customers other than eBay falls below established minimum thresholds, eBay would no longer be obligated to make any payments in respect of the Penetration Rates to PayPal.

Subject to certain exceptions, the operating agreement will also provide that for the term of the operating agreement (but not the tail period described below), eBay will not declare itself as the single merchant of record for transactions effected through any service or offering available on the core eBay Marketplaces properties unless PayPal is acquired by certain specified competitors of eBay. For purposes of the agreement, the term “Merchant of Record” generally means the entity that PayPal holds financially liable for all full and partial returns as well as any chargebacks initiated by the customer. In the event that PayPal is acquired by certain specified competitors of eBay, eBay may elect to become a merchant of record by giving written notice to PayPal within 90 days of the consummation of such acquisition, and such election would become effective on a date specified by eBay that is between 15 and 21 months after the consummation of such acquisition.

Subject to certain exceptions, eBay and its controlled affiliates will be prohibited from directly or indirectly engaging in the business of marketing, distributing, promoting or selling its own proprietary payment solutions for use on the core eBay Marketplaces properties or on properties operated by third parties in most geographic jurisdictions in which eBay Marketplaces operates, and PayPal and its controlled affiliates will be prohibited from directly or indirectly engaging in the business of marketing, distributing, promoting or selling its own proprietary marketplace offering for the sale of physical goods. These restrictions will continue for the term of the operating agreement but will not continue during the tail period described below.

The operating agreement will provide for eBay and PayPal to enter into a product development agreement that requires eBay and PayPal to mutually discuss in good faith and agree on a product development plan for optimizing the PayPal experience on the core eBay Marketplaces properties and to invest development resources in other strategic initiatives related to the provision of payment processing and credit services by PayPal. PayPal and eBay will agree in the product development agreement to commit certain resources and development staff to the projects included in the product development plan.

The operating agreement will also provide for eBay and PayPal to enter into a data sharing addendum pursuant to which eBay and its subsidiaries, on the one hand, and PayPal and its subsidiaries, on the other hand, will share information for risk, trust and fraud modeling and customer service operations in a manner consistent with current usage and in conformance with legal and regulatory requirements. Neither party will be permitted to use such data for any purpose beyond the scope of the agreement without entering into a separate, arms-length commercial arrangement that is in compliance with legal and regulatory requirements.

In the event that PayPal is acquired by certain specified competitors of eBay, eBay may elect to terminate all or any portion of the data sharing addendum by giving written notice to PayPal within 90 days of the consummation of such acquisition, and such election would become effective on a date specified by eBay. In addition, and regardless of whether eBay terminates the data sharing addendum, the operating agreement will restrict the specified competitor that consummates the acquisition and its subsidiaries and affiliates (other than PayPal and its subsidiaries) from using eBay user data for any purpose.

The operating agreement will have an initial term of 5 years following the distribution date and will be renewable by mutual agreement for successive 1-year terms. At the expiration of the operating agreement, there will be a 1-year tail period during which the provisions of the agreement will continue to apply, except for eBay’s obligation to make payments in respect of the Penetration Rate, the restriction on eBay’s ability to declare

itself a merchant of record, the non-compete restrictions applicable to eBay and PayPal and the parties’ respective obligations under the product development agreement. During the 1-year tail period and for up to 1-year after the termination of the agreement for a material breach, the parties will use reasonable best efforts to cooperate in good faith to transition off of the services provided under the agreement, with such cooperation reimbursed by the other party at cost. During the term of the operating agreement, both parties can mutually decide to amend the agreement as appropriate. In addition, either party will be able to terminate for certain uncured material breaches so long as the parties have first gone through the dispute resolution procedures set forth below.

The operating agreement will require the parties to generally follow the dispute resolution provisions set forth in the separation and distribution agreement. The operating agreement will also provide for regular review of the effectiveness of the parties’ performance under the operating agreement and the product development agreement, the costs and benefits of the operating agreement and the product development agreement and the general relationship between the parties by members of management, including the CEOs of eBay and PayPal, as well as the respective boards of directors of eBay and PayPal.

The operating agreement will also include other customary terms and conditions, including the establishment of service levels to measure PayPal’s performance of its payment processing and credit services as well as provisions addressing information security, data protection, disaster recovery, confidentiality, indemnification and other matters.

PayPal and eBay will enter into a transition services agreement prior to the distribution pursuant to which eBay and its subsidiaries and PayPal and its subsidiaries will provide, on an interim, transitional basis, various services to each other, including, but not limited to, related to human resources administrative systems and related support services, hosting services, separation of commingled information technology assets, and customer service and loyalty programs support. These services will be provided, generally for a period of up to 24 months (including extensions), on a cost-plus basis. The recipient for a particular service will generally be able to terminate that service prior to the scheduled expiration date, subject to a specified minimum notice period. Due to interdependencies between services, certain services may be extended or terminated early only if other services are likewise extended or terminated.

The cumulative liability of each party under the transition services agreement will be limited to the aggregate charges paid and payable to the provider in connection with the provision of services under the agreement, except for breaches of confidentiality obligations or in the case of gross negligence, willful misconduct or fraud. The transition services agreement will also provide that each party will not be liable to the other party for any indirect, incidental, consequential, special, punitive, exemplary, remote, speculative or similar damages, except in the case of gross negligence, willful misconduct or fraud or certain third-party claims.

PayPal and eBay will enter into a tax matters agreement that will govern the parties’ respective rights, responsibilities and obligations after the distribution with respect to tax matters, including responsibility for taxes, entitlement to refunds, allocation of tax attributes, preparation of tax returns, certain tax elections, control of tax contests, cooperation, and certain other tax matters.

Under the tax matters agreement, eBay generally will be responsible for all taxes (and will be entitled to all related refunds of taxes) imposed on eBay and its subsidiaries (including subsidiaries that will be transferred to PayPal pursuant to the separation) with respect to taxable periods (or portions thereof) that end on or prior to the

distribution date, except that PayPal will be responsible for such taxes to the extent (i) they relate to matters with respect to which PayPal or any of its subsidiaries has reflected a FIN 48 reserve in its financial statements on the date of the distribution, (ii) they are non-income taxes incurred in the ordinary course of business that have been accrued on the financial statements of PayPal or any of its subsidiaries on the date of the distribution, or (iii) they result from any breach of any representation or covenant made by PayPal in the tax matters agreement or other separation-related agreements. eBay will also be responsible for certain taxes imposed on PayPal with respect to the 12-month period following the distribution to the extent such taxes relate to specified historic tax reporting positions taken by eBay.

The tax matters agreement will provide special rules that allocate tax liabilities in the event the distribution together with certain related transactions, fails to qualify as a transaction that is generally tax-free, for U.S. federal income tax purposes, under Sections 368(a)(1)(D) and 355 of the Code. Under the tax matters agreement, each party generally will be responsible for any taxes and related amounts imposed on eBay or PayPal that arise from the failure of the distribution, together with certain related transactions, to qualify as a transaction that is generally tax-free, for U.S. federal income tax purposes, under Sections 368(a)(1)(D) and 355 of the Code, to the extent that the failure to so qualify is attributable to a breach of the relevant representations or covenants made by that party in the tax matters agreement or an acquisition of such party’s equity securities. In addition, the tax matters agreement will impose certain restrictions on PayPal and its subsidiaries (including restrictions (subject to specified exceptions) on share issuances, business combinations, sales of assets and similar transactions) during the two-year period following the distribution that are designed to preserve the tax-free status of the distribution and certain related transactions.

Under the tax matters agreement, eBay generally will have the right to control any audits or other tax proceedings with respect to any eBay consolidated federal income tax return (or other group return that includes eBay or any of its subsidiaries and PayPal or any of its subsidiaries), provided that PayPal will have participation rights with respect to any such audit or tax proceeding that could result in additional taxes for which PayPal is liable under the tax matters agreement. PayPal will have the right to control any audits or other tax proceedings with respect to any PayPal consolidated federal income tax return or any separate tax returns of PayPal or any of its subsidiaries, provided that eBay will have participation rights with respect to any such audit or tax proceeding that could result in additional taxes for which eBay is liable under the tax matters agreement.

PayPal and eBay will enter into an employee matters agreement prior to the separation to allocate liabilities and responsibilities relating to employment matters, employee compensation and benefits plans and programs and other related matters. The employee matters agreement will govern certain compensation and employee benefit obligations with respect to the current and former employees and non-employee directors of each company.

The employee matters agreement will provide that, unless otherwise specified, eBay will be responsible for liabilities associated with employees who will be employed by eBay following the separation, former employees whose last employment was with the eBay businesses and certain specified current and former corporate employees (collectively, the “eBay allocated employees”), and PayPal will be responsible for liabilities associated with employees who will be employed by PayPal following the separation, former employees whose last employment was with the PayPal businesses and certain specified current and former corporate employees (collectively, the “PayPal allocated employees”).

PayPal allocated employees will be eligible to participate in PayPal benefit plans following the separation in accordance with the terms and conditions of the PayPal benefit plans as in effect from time to time. Generally, PayPal will agree to establish and maintain (i) welfare benefit arrangements that are substantially similar in the aggregate to those provided by eBay to PayPal allocated employees immediately prior to the separation, through at least December 31, 2015 and (ii) retirement benefits with terms that are substantially the same as the corresponding

eBay arrangements and that provide benefits that are no less favorable than those provided by eBay to eligible PayPal allocated employees immediately prior to the separation, through at least December 31, 2015.

In general, PayPal will credit each PayPal allocated employee with his or her service with eBay prior to the separation for all purposes under the PayPal benefit plans to the same extent such service was recognized by eBay for similar purposes and so long as such crediting does not result in a duplication of benefits.

The employee matters agreement will also include provisions relating to cooperation between the two companies on matters relating to employees and employee benefits and other administrative provisions.

On June 16, 2015, PayPal established a non-qualified deferred compensation plan effective as of immediately prior to the effective time. On June 19, 2015, PayPal established a defined contribution plan effective June 19, 2015. Each of these plans cover active PayPal allocated employees. In connection with the separation, assets, liabilities and account balances (as applicable) of PayPal allocated employees will be transferred to PayPal or PayPal plans, as applicable, and eBay or eBay plans will retain assets, liabilities and account balances (as applicable) of eBay allocated employees and former PayPal allocated employees.

The employee matters agreement will provide for the adjustment of outstanding awards granted under eBay’s equity compensation programs (including awards under assumed plans) to reflect the impact of the separation in accordance with the terms of such program. Generally, each employee holder of eBay equity awards (but not common stock derived from vested equity awards, which shall be treated like all other common stock) will hold equity awards only in the company that employs such employee following the separation. For example, eBay equity awards held by PayPal employees will be assumed by PayPal and converted into awards that relate to shares of PayPal common stock at the separation, and eBay equity awards held by employees who will remain employed by eBay after the separation will continue to be equity awards that relate to shares of eBay common stock, but adjusted to reflect the effect of the separation.

In addition, (1) certain previously disclosed executives of eBay who will not be employed with either eBay or PayPal after the separation (“transitioning executives”) and (2) nonemployee directors of eBay, including any nonemployee director who immediately after the separation will serve on our board of directors, will receive both adjusted eBay equity awards (relating to shares of eBay common stock) and adjusted PayPal awards (relating to shares of PayPal common stock), based on the distribution ratio being applied to shares of eBay common stock held by all eBay stockholders in the distribution.

Outstanding eBay equity awards held by PayPal employees are expected to be treated as shown in the table below:

Outstanding eBay equity awards held by nonemployee directors of eBay are expected to be treated as shown in the table below:

In addition, upon a change in control of PayPal in the case of a director transferring to PayPal or a change in control of eBay in the case of a continuing eBay director, all adjusted equity awards held by any such director of the company experiencing the change in control will become vested.

In the separation, pursuant to the eBay transition success and retention program, transitioning executives are expected to become vested in certain unvested awards, and otherwise receive both adjusted eBay equity awards (relating to shares of eBay common stock) and adjusted PayPal awards (relating to shares of PayPal common stock), based on the distribution ratio being applied to shares of eBay common stock held by all eBay stockholders in the distribution, in the same manner as the awards for the nonemployee directors of eBay as described above.

PayPal will be required to adopt the PayPal Employee Stock Purchase Plan, under which all outstanding options held under the eBay Employee Stock Purchase Plan by PayPal employees will be converted into options for PayPal shares under the PayPal Employee Stock Purchase Plan in the same manner as their equity awards, as described above.

To the extent that the equity award adjustment and/or conversion provisions described above would be prohibited under the laws of a jurisdiction outside of the United States in which an affected eBay or PayPal employee resides, such provisions shall be modified or suspended to the extent necessary to comply with such laws.

eBay will generally be responsible for medical, dental, vision, life, accidental death and dismemberment, long-term disability, and travel accident claims incurred under the eBay welfare plans prior to the effective time, whether incurred by employees who will be employed by eBay or PayPal following the effective time or by former employees. PayPal will generally be responsible for claims incurred under its welfare plans at or following the effective time. PayPal will also be responsible for all liabilities with respect to earned vacation, severance, unemployment compensation and similar categories for the PayPal employees.

PayPal and eBay will enter into an intellectual property matters agreement that will memorialize each of PayPal’s and eBay’s ownership, after the distribution, of intellectual property assets such as patents, patent applications, trademarks, domains and copyrights. The agreement will also vest in each of PayPal and eBay the sole right to prosecute, maintain, enforce and defend its interest in the intellectual property assets owned by it after the distribution, will include limited non-exclusive licenses by each of PayPal and eBay to the other to use certain software code owned by it after the distribution, and will include limited covenants not to sue by each of PayPal and eBay to the other for certain intellectual property assets owned by it after the separation. The intellectual property agreement will remain in effect until the expiration of the last to expire of the intellectual property rights licensed or for which a covenant not to sue is given thereunder, unless terminated earlier by mutual agreement of the parties.

PayPal and eBay will enter into colocation services agreements provide to colocation space and related information technology services at various data center facilities. In certain locations, eBay will provide space to PayPal for the placement of PayPal data center equipment within eBay’s facilities in exchange for specific quarterly charges intended to allow eBay to recover the cost of maintaining and servicing such space, and eBay will provide related services and infrastructure to PayPal on a cost-plus basis, including power distribution, fiber (internet and telecommunications) connections, HVAC and climate control, fire protection, on site security, general property management, and back up redundancy systems. In Phoenix, Arizona and Denver, Colorado, PayPal will provide space and power to eBay for the placement of eBay data center equipment within PayPal’s facilities in exchange for specific quarterly charges intended to allow PayPal to recover the cost of such space, and PayPal will provide related services and infrastructure to eBay on a cost-plus basis, including power distribution, fiber (internet and telecommunications) connections, HVAC and climate control, fire protection, and back up redundancy systems. Each such agreement will have a fixed term of two years and, with respect to certain of the facilities, may be renewed by eBay or PayPal for a period of up to three additional years, as applicable, under certain circumstances.

It is expected that PayPal’s board will adopt a written policy for the review of related party transactions other than those governed by the operating agreement. For purposes of the policy, a related party transaction will include transactions in which (1) the amount involved is more than $120,000 in any consecutive 12-month period, (2) PayPal is a participant, and (3) any related party has a direct or indirect material interest. The policy is expected to define a “related party” to include directors, nominees for director, executive officers, holders of more than 5% of PayPal’s outstanding common stock and their respective immediate family members. Pursuant to the policy, all related party transactions must be approved by the appropriate committee of PayPal’s board of directors or, in the event of an inadvertent failure to bring the transaction to the committee for pre-approval, ratified by the committee. In the event that a member of the Committee has an interest in a related party transaction, the transaction must be approved or ratified by the disinterested members of the committee. In deciding whether to approve or ratify a related party transaction, the reviewing committee will consider the following factors:

The following is a discussion of material U.S. federal income tax consequences of the distribution of shares of our common stock to “U.S. Holders” (as defined below) of shares of eBay common stock. This summary is based on the Code, U.S. Treasury regulations promulgated thereunder, rulings and other administrative pronouncements issued by the IRS, and judicial decisions, all as in effect on the date of this information statement, and all of which are subject to change at any time, possibly with retroactive effect. No assurance can be given that the IRS would not assert, or that a court would not sustain, a position contrary to any of the tax consequences described below. This discussion applies only to U.S. Holders of eBay common stock who hold such shares as a capital asset within the meaning of Section 1221 of the Code (generally, property held for investment). This discussion is based upon the assumption that the distribution, together with certain related transactions, will be consummated in accordance with the separation documents and as described in this information statement. This summary is for general information only and is not tax advice. It does not discuss all aspects of U.S. federal income taxation that may be relevant to a particular holder in light of its particular circumstances or to holders subject to special rules under the Code (including, but not limited to, insurance companies, tax-exempt organizations, financial institutions, broker-dealers, partners in partnerships that hold our common shares, pass-through entities, traders in securities who elect to apply a mark-to-market method of accounting, stockholders who hold our common shares as part of a “hedge,” “straddle,” “conversion,” “synthetic security,” “integrated investment,” or “constructive sale transaction,” individuals who receive our common shares upon the exercise of employee stock options or otherwise as compensation, holders who are liable for the alternative minimum tax or any holders who actually or constructively own more than 5% of eBay common stock). This discussion also does not address any tax consequences arising under the unearned Medicare contribution tax pursuant to the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010, nor does it address any tax considerations under state, local or foreign laws or U.S. federal laws other than those pertaining to the U.S. federal income tax.

If a partnership, including for this purpose any entity or arrangement that is treated as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes, holds eBay common stock, the tax treatment of a partner in such partnership will generally depend upon the status of the partner and the activities of the partnership. An investor that is a partnership and the partners in such partnership should consult their own tax advisors regarding the U.S. federal income tax consequences of the distribution.

For purposes of this discussion a “U.S. Holder” is any beneficial owner of eBay common stock that is, for U.S. federal income tax purposes:

THE FOLLOWING DISCUSSION IS A SUMMARY OF MATERIAL U.S. FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSEQUENCES OF THE DISTRIBUTION UNDER CURRENT LAW AND IS FOR GENERAL INFORMATION ONLY. HOLDERS OF EBAY COMMON STOCK SHOULD CONSULT THEIR OWN TAX ADVISORS AS TO THE PARTICULAR TAX CONSEQUENCES OF THE DISTRIBUTION TO THEM, INCLUDING THE APPLICATION AND EFFECT OF U.S. FEDERAL, STATE, LOCAL AND FOREIGN TAX LAWS.

eBay has not sought and does not intend to seek a ruling from the IRS with respect to the treatment of the distribution and certain related transactions for U.S. federal income tax purposes and there can be no assurance that the IRS will not assert that the distribution and/or certain related transactions are taxable. It is a condition to the distribution that eBay receive an opinion of outside counsel or tax advisors regarding the qualification of the distribution, together with certain related transactions, as a transaction that is generally tax free, for U.S. federal income tax purposes, under Sections 368(a)(1)(D) and 355 of the Code. The opinion of counsel will be based and rely on, among other things, certain facts and assumptions, as well as certain representations, statements and undertakings of eBay and PayPal (including those relating to the past and future conduct of eBay and PayPal). If any of these representations, statements or undertakings are, or become, inaccurate or incomplete, or if eBay or PayPal breach any of their respective covenants in the separation documents, the opinion of counsel may be invalid and the conclusions reached therein could be jeopardized. An opinion of counsel is not binding on the IRS or the courts.

Notwithstanding receipt by eBay of an opinion of counsel, the IRS could assert that the distribution and/or certain related transactions do not qualify for tax-free treatment for U.S. federal income tax purposes. If the IRS were successful in taking this position, eBay, PayPal and eBay stockholders could be subject to significant U.S. federal income tax liability. Please refer to “Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences if the Distribution is Taxable” below.

Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences if the Distribution Qualifies as a Transaction That is Generally Tax Free under Sections 368(a)(1)(D) and 355 of the Code.

Assuming the distribution, together with certain related transactions, qualifies as a transaction that is generally tax free for U.S. federal income tax purposes under Sections 368(a)(1)(D) and 355 of the Code, the U.S. federal income tax consequences of the distribution are as follows: (i) the distribution will generally not result in any taxable income, gain or loss to eBay, other than taxable income or gain possibly arising out of internal reorganizations and restructurings undertaken in connection with the distribution and with respect to items required to be taken into account under U.S. Treasury regulations relating to consolidated federal income tax returns; (ii) no gain or loss will generally be recognized by (and no amount will be included in the income of) U.S. Holders of eBay common stock upon their receipt of PayPal common stock in the distribution, except with respect to any cash received in lieu of fractional shares of PayPal common stock (as described below); (iii) the aggregate tax basis of the eBay common stock and the PayPal common stock received in the distribution (including any fractional share interest in PayPal common stock for which cash is received) in the hands of each U.S. Holder of eBay common stock after the distribution will equal the aggregate basis of eBay common stock held by the U.S. Holder immediately before the distribution, allocated between the eBay common stock and the PayPal common stock (including any fractional share interest in PayPal common stock for which cash is received) in proportion to the relative fair market value of each on the date of the distribution; and (iv) the holding period of the PayPal common stock received by each U.S. Holder of eBay common stock in the distribution (including any fractional share interest in PayPal common stock for which cash is received) will generally include the holding period at the time of the distribution for the eBay common stock with respect to which the distribution is made. A U.S. Holder who receives cash in lieu of a fractional share of PayPal common stock in the distribution will be treated as having sold such fractional share for cash, and will recognize capital gain or loss in an amount equal to the difference between the amount of cash received and such U.S. Holder’s adjusted tax basis in such fractional share. Such gain or loss will be long-term capital gain or loss if the U.S. Holder’s holding period for its eBay common stock exceeds one year at the time of the distribution.

U.S. Treasury regulations provide that if a U.S. Holder of eBay common stock holds different blocks of eBay common stock (generally shares of eBay common stock purchased or acquired on different dates or at different prices), the aggregate basis for each block of eBay common stock purchased or acquired on the same date and at the same price will be allocated, to the greatest extent possible, between the PayPal common stock received in the distribution in respect of such block of eBay common stock and such block of eBay common stock, in proportion to their respective fair market values, and the holding period of the PayPal common stock

received in the distribution in respect of such block of eBay common stock will generally include the holding period of such block of eBay common stock. If a U.S. Holder of eBay common stock is not able to identify which particular shares of PayPal common stock are received in the distribution with respect to a particular block of eBay common stock, for purposes of applying the rules described above, the U.S. Holder may designate which shares of PayPal common stock are received in the distribution in respect of a particular block of eBay common stock, provided that such designation is consistent with the terms of the distribution. Holders of eBay common stock are urged to consult their own tax advisors regarding the application of these rules to their particular circumstances.

Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences if the Distribution is Taxable.

As discussed above, eBay has not and does not intend to seek a ruling from the IRS with respect to the treatment of the distribution and certain related transactions for U.S. federal income tax purposes. Notwithstanding receipt by eBay of an opinion from outside counsel or tax advisors described above, the IRS could assert that the distribution does not qualify for tax-free treatment for U.S. federal income tax purposes. If the IRS were successful in taking this position, the consequences described above would not apply and eBay, PayPal and eBay stockholders could be subject to significant U.S. federal income tax liability. In addition, certain events that may or may not be within the control of eBay or PayPal, could cause the distribution and certain related transactions to fail to qualify as a transaction that is generally tax free, for U.S. federal income tax purposes, under Sections 368(a)(1)(D) and 355 of the Code. Depending on the circumstances, PayPal may be required to indemnify eBay for taxes (and certain related losses) resulting from the distribution not qualifying as tax-free.

If the distribution fails to qualify as a transaction that is generally tax free, for U.S. federal income tax purposes, in general, eBay would recognize taxable gain as if it had sold the PayPal common stock in a taxable sale for its fair market value (unless eBay and PayPal jointly make an election under Section 336(e) of the Code with respect to the distribution, in which case, in general, (i) the eBay group would recognize taxable gain as if PayPal had sold all of its assets in a taxable sale in exchange for an amount equal to the fair market value of the PayPal common stock and the assumption of all of PayPal’s liabilities and (ii) PayPal would obtain a related step up in the basis of its assets) and eBay stockholders who receive PayPal common stock in the distribution would be subject to tax as if they had received a taxable distribution equal to the fair market value of such shares.

In addition, even if the distribution were to otherwise qualify as tax-free under Sections 368(a)(1)(D) and 355 of the Code, it may result in taxable gain to eBay under Section 355(e) of the Code, if the distribution were later deemed to be part of a plan (or series of related transactions) pursuant to which one or more persons acquire, directly or indirectly, shares representing a 50% or greater interest (by vote or value) in eBay or PayPal. For this purpose, any acquisitions of eBay stock or of PayPal shares within the period beginning two years before the separation and ending two years after the separation are presumed to be part of such a plan, although eBay or PayPal may be able to rebut that presumption.

In connection with the distribution, eBay and PayPal will enter into a tax matters agreement. For a discussion of the tax matters agreement, please refer to “Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions—The Tax Matters Agreement.”

Payments of cash to a U.S. Holder of eBay common stock in lieu of fractional shares of PayPal common stock may be subject to information reporting and backup withholding (currently, at a rate of 28%), unless such U.S. Holder delivers a properly completed IRS Form W-9, certifying such U.S. Holder’s correct taxpayer identification number and certain other information, or otherwise establishing a basis for exemption from backup withholding. Backup withholding is not an additional tax. Any amounts withheld under the backup withholding rules may be refunded or credited against a U.S. Holder’s U.S. federal income tax liability provided that the required information is timely furnished to the IRS.

U.S. Treasury regulations require certain U.S. Holders who receive shares of PayPal common stock in the distribution to attach to such U.S. Holder’s U.S. federal income tax return for the year in which the distribution occurs a detailed statement setting forth certain information relating to the tax-free nature of the distribution.

THE FOREGOING DISCUSSION IS A SUMMARY OF MATERIAL U.S. FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSEQUENCES OF THE DISTRIBUTION UNDER CURRENT LAW AND IS FOR GENERAL INFORMATION PURPOSES ONLY. THE FOREGOING DISCUSSION DOES NOT PURPORT TO ADDRESS ALL U.S. FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSEQUENCES OF THE DISTRIBUTION OR TAX CONSEQUENCES THAT MAY ARISE UNDER THE TAX LAWS OF OTHER JURISDICTIONS OR THAT MAY APPLY TO PARTICULAR CATEGORIES OF STOCKHOLDERS. HOLDERS OF EBAY COMMON STOCK SHOULD CONSULT THEIR OWN TAX ADVISORS AS TO THE PARTICULAR TAX CONSEQUENCES OF THE DISTRIBUTION TO THEM, INCLUDING THE APPLICATION AND EFFECT OF U.S. FEDERAL, STATE, LOCAL AND FOREIGN TAX LAWS.

PayPal does not currently expect to incur any material indebtedness in connection with the separation and distribution, although that expectation may change.

Before the separation, all of the outstanding shares of PayPal’s common stock will be owned beneficially and of record by eBay. Following the distribution, PayPal expects to have outstanding an aggregate of approximately 1.22 billion shares of common stock based upon approximately 1.22 billion shares of eBay common stock outstanding on June 1, 2015, excluding treasury shares and assuming no exercise of eBay stock options, and applying the distribution ratio.

The following table reports the number of shares of PayPal common stock that PayPal expects will be beneficially owned, immediately following the completion of the distribution by each person (other than PayPal’s expected executive officers and directors) who will beneficially own more than five percent of PayPal’s common stock. The table is based upon information available as of June 1, 2015 as to those persons (other than PayPal’s expected executive officers and directors) who beneficially own more than five percent of eBay’s common stock and an assumption that, for each share of eBay common stock held by such persons, they will receive one share of PayPal common stock.

The following table sets forth information, immediately following the completion of the separation calculated as of June 1, 2015, based upon the distribution of one share of PayPal common stock for each share of eBay common stock, regarding (1) each expected director, director nominee and named executive officer of PayPal and (2) all of PayPal’s expected directors and executive officers as a group. Unless otherwise indicated below, the address of each director, director nominee and executive officer shown in the table below is c/o PayPal Holdings, Inc., Attention: Corporate Secretary, 2211 North First Street, San Jose, California 95131.

This table is based upon information supplied by officers, directors, and principal stockholders. Beneficial ownership is determined in accordance with the rules of the SEC and generally includes voting or investment power with respect to securities. Unless otherwise indicated in the footnotes to this table, the persons and entities named in the table have sole voting and sole investment power with respect to all shares beneficially owned, subject to community property laws where applicable. Shares of our common stock subject to options that are currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of June 1, 2015, and restricted stock units, or RSUs, that are scheduled to vest within 60 days of June 1, 2015, are deemed to be outstanding for the purpose of computing the percentage ownership of the person holding those options, but are not treated as outstanding for the purpose of computing the percentage ownership of any other person. The percentage of beneficial ownership is based on approximately 1.22 billion shares of common stock outstanding as of June 1, 2015.

PayPal’s certificate of incorporation and bylaws will be amended and restated prior to the separation. The following is a summary of the material terms of PayPal’s capital stock that will be contained in the amended and restated certificate of incorporation and bylaws. The summaries and descriptions below do not purport to be complete statements of the relevant provisions of the certificate of incorporation or of the bylaws that will be in effect at the time of the distribution, which you must read for complete information on PayPal’s capital stock as of the time of the distribution. The certificate of incorporation and bylaws, each in a form expected to be in effect at the time of the distribution, are included as exhibits to PayPal’s registration statement on Form 10, of which this information statement forms a part. The summaries and descriptions below do not purport to be complete statements of the Delaware General Corporation Law.

PayPal’s authorized capital stock will consist of 4 billion shares of common stock, par value $0.0001 per share, and 100 million shares of preferred stock, par value $0.0001 per share, all of which shares of preferred stock are undesignated. PayPal’s board of directors may establish the rights and preferences of the preferred stock from time to time. Subject to the terms of an agreement entered into between eBay Inc. and the Icahn Group and filed as Exhibit 99.2 to eBay Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated January 23, 2015 (the “Icahn Agreement”), immediately following the distribution, PayPal expects that approximately 1.22 billion shares of its common stock will be issued and outstanding and that no shares of preferred stock will be issued and outstanding.

Each holder of PayPal common stock will be entitled to one vote for each share on all matters to be voted upon by the common stockholders, and there will be no cumulative voting rights. To be elected in an uncontested election for board members, a director nominee must receive more votes “for” than “against” by shares present in person or by proxy and entitled to vote. In a contested election for board members, the board members are elected by a plurality of shares present in person or by proxy and entitled to vote.

Subject to any preferential rights of any outstanding preferred stock, holders of PayPal common stock will be entitled to receive ratably the dividends, if any, as may be declared from time to time by its board of directors out of funds legally available for that purpose. If there is a liquidation, dissolution or winding up of PayPal, holders of its common stock would be entitled to ratable distribution of its assets remaining after the payment in full of liabilities and any preferential rights of any then outstanding preferred stock.

Holders of PayPal common stock will have no preemptive or conversion rights or other subscription rights, and there are no redemption or sinking fund provisions applicable to the common stock. After the distribution, all outstanding shares of PayPal common stock will be fully paid and non-assessable. The rights, preferences and privileges of the holders of PayPal common stock are subject to, and may be adversely affected by, the rights of the holders of shares of any series of preferred stock that PayPal may designate and issue in the future.

Under the terms of PayPal’s amended and restated certificate of incorporation, its board of directors will be authorized, subject to limitations prescribed by the Delaware General Corporation Law (the “DGCL”), and by its certificate of incorporation, to issue up to 100 million shares of preferred stock in one or more series without further action by the holders of its common stock. PayPal’s board of directors will have the discretion, subject to limitations prescribed by the DGCL and by PayPal’s certificate of incorporation, to determine the rights, preferences, privileges and restrictions, including voting rights, dividend rights, conversion rights, redemption privileges and liquidation preferences, of each series of preferred stock.

PayPal will institute stockholder-friendly corporate governance practices, as described below and elsewhere in this information statement. Responsible and appropriate corporate governance will ensure that PayPal’s board always keeps stockholder interests top of mind when crafting value-creating strategies at all levels of the organization.

Single Class Capital Structure. PayPal will have a single class common equity capital structure with all stockholders entitled to vote for director nominees. Each holder of common stock will have one vote per share.

Annual Director Elections. Commencing with the first annual meeting of stockholders following the distribution, which will be held within twelve (12) months of the distribution date, directors will be elected at the annual meeting of stockholders and thereafter each director will serve until the next annual election and until his or her successor is duly elected and qualified, or until his or her earlier resignation or removal. At any meeting of stockholders for the election of directors at which a quorum is present, the election will be determined by a majority of the votes cast by the stockholders entitled to vote in the election, with directors not receiving a majority of the votes cast required to tender their resignations for consideration by the board, except that in the case of a contested election, the election will be determined by a plurality of the votes cast by the stockholders entitled to vote in the election.

Special Stockholder Meetings. PayPal’s amended and restated certificate of incorporation will provide that special meetings of the stockholders of the corporation may only be called by (1) the board of directors pursuant to a resolution adopted by a majority of the total number of authorized directors, (2) the chairman of the board, (3) the chief executive officer, or (4) subject to certain procedures and conditions set forth therein, by PayPal’s corporate secretary at the request of one or more stockholders who have held beneficial ownership of at least a twenty percent (20%) “net long position” of the outstanding common stock of PayPal for at least thirty (30) days prior to the delivery of such request. Until such time as a single stockholder, or “group” of stockholders who have filed as such under Section 13(d) of the Exchange Act with respect to their ownership of PayPal common stock, owns at least a majority of PayPal’s outstanding common stock, no stockholder will be permitted to propose the removal of directors or the election of directors at stockholder-called special meetings.

Proxy Access. In recognition of the growing sentiment in the investment community that significant stockholders ought to have the opportunity to propose candidates for election as directors in the Company’s proxy statement, we will provide proxy access rights in our organizational documents. PayPal’s amended and restated certificate of incorporation will provide that, in certain circumstances, a stockholder or group of up to 15 stockholders may include director candidates that they have nominated in our annual meeting proxy materials. Such stockholder or group of stockholders will need to own 3% or more of PayPal’s outstanding common stock continuously for at least three years. The number of stockholder-nominated candidates appearing in any of our annual meeting proxy materials will not exceed 20% of the number of directors then serving on the Board, rounded down to the nearest whole number, subject to reduction in certain circumstances, including where stockholders have nominated candidates for election at the same meeting outside the proxy access process. The nominating stockholder or group of stockholders will also be required to deliver certain information and undertakings, and each nominee will be required to meet certain qualifications, as described in more detail in the amended and restated certificate of incorporation.

No Supermajority Provisions. Other than with respect to the interested stockholder provision described below in “Anti-Takeover Effects of Various Provisions of Delaware Law and PayPal’s Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws—Interested Stockholder Provision” (which is being implemented in connection with PayPal’s opting out of Section 203 of the DGCL), PayPal’s amended and restated certificate of incorporation and bylaws do not have supermajority voting provisions, and stockholders can approve binding bylaw amendments with a simple majority vote.

Other Expected Corporate Governance Features. Governance features related to PayPal’s board of directors are set forth in the section of this information statement captioned “Directors.” In addition to the foregoing, it is expected that PayPal will implement stock ownership guidelines for directors and senior executive officers, annual board performance evaluations, clawback, anti-hedging and anti-pledging policies, conflict of interest policies, risk oversight procedures and other practices and protocols.

PayPal’s amended and restated certificate of incorporation will provide that, unless PayPal consents in writing to the selection of an alternative forum, the sole and exclusive forum for (1) any derivative action or proceeding brought on behalf of the Company, (2) any action asserting a claim of breach of a fiduciary duty owed by any director or officer or other employee of the Company to the Company or the Company’s stockholders, (3) any action asserting a claim against the Company or any director or officer or other employee of the Company arising pursuant to any provision of the DGCL or PayPal’s certificate of incorporation or the bylaws (as either may be amended from time to time), or (4) any action asserting a claim against the Company or any director or officer or other employee of the Company governed by the internal affairs doctrine shall be a state court located within the State of Delaware (or, if no state court located within the State of Delaware has jurisdiction, the federal district court for the District of Delaware).

Limitations on Liability, Indemnification of Officers and Directors and Insurance

The DGCL authorizes corporations to limit or eliminate the personal liability of directors to corporations and their stockholders for monetary damages for breaches of directors’ fiduciary duties as directors, and PayPal’s amended and restated certificate of incorporation will include such an exculpation provision. PayPal’s amended and restated certificate of incorporation and bylaws will include provisions that indemnify, to the fullest extent allowable under the DGCL, the personal liability of directors or officers for monetary damages for actions taken as a director or officer of PayPal, or for serving at PayPal’s request as a director or officer or another position at another corporation or enterprise, as the case may be. PayPal’s amended and restated certificate of incorporation and bylaws will also provide that PayPal must indemnify and advance reasonable expenses to its directors and officers, subject to its receipt of an undertaking from the indemnified party as may be required under the DGCL. PayPal’s amended and restated certificate of incorporation will expressly authorize PayPal to carry directors’ and officers’ insurance to protect PayPal, its directors, officers and certain employees for some liabilities.

The limitation of liability and indemnification provisions that will be in PayPal’s amended and restated certificate of incorporation and bylaws may discourage stockholders from bringing a lawsuit against directors for breach of their fiduciary duty. These provisions may also have the effect of reducing the likelihood of derivative litigation against PayPal’s directors and officers, even though such an action, if successful, might otherwise benefit PayPal and its stockholders. However, these provisions will not limit or eliminate PayPal’s rights, or those of any stockholder, to seek non-monetary relief such as injunction or rescission in the event of a breach of a director’s duty of care. The provisions will not alter the liability of directors under the federal securities laws. In addition, your investment may be adversely affected to the extent that, in a class action or direct suit, PayPal pays the costs of settlement and damage awards against directors and officers pursuant to these indemnification provisions. There is currently no pending material litigation or proceeding against any PayPal directors, officers or employees for which indemnification is sought.

PayPal’s authorized but unissued shares of common stock and preferred stock will be available for future issuance without your approval. PayPal may use additional shares for a variety of purposes, including future public offerings to raise additional capital, to fund acquisitions and as employee compensation. Certain limitations on the use of authorized but unissued preferred stock are contained in the Icahn Agreement. Nonetheless, the existence of authorized but unissued shares of common stock and preferred stock could render more difficult or discourage an attempt to obtain control of PayPal by means of a proxy contest, tender offer, merger or otherwise.

Anti-Takeover Effects of Various Provisions of Delaware Law and PayPal’s Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws

Provisions of the DGCL and PayPal’s certificate of incorporation and bylaws could potentially impact the prospect of an acquisition of PayPal by means of a tender offer, a proxy contest or otherwise, or affect the ability to remove incumbent officers and directors. These provisions may discourage certain types of coercive takeover practices and takeover bids that PayPal’s board of directors may consider inadequate and may encourage persons seeking to acquire control of PayPal to first negotiate with PayPal’s board of directors. PayPal believes that the benefits of increased protection of its ability to negotiate with the proponent of an unsolicited proposal to acquire or restructure the Company outweigh the disadvantages of discouraging takeover or acquisition proposals because, among other things, negotiation of these proposals could result in an improvement of their terms.

Size of Board and Vacancies. PayPal’s amended and restated bylaws will provide that the number of directors on its board of directors will initially be nine and thereafter shall be fixed exclusively by its board of directors. Any vacancies created in its board of directors resulting from any increase in the authorized number of directors or the death, resignation, retirement or removal from service will be filled only by a majority of the board of directors then in office, even if less than a quorum is present, or by a sole remaining director.

Interested Stockholder Provision. PayPal has elected not to be governed by Section 203 of the DGCL, an anti-takeover statute that prohibits a publicly held Delaware corporation from engaging in a “business combination” with an “interested stockholder” for a period of three years following the time the person became an interested stockholder, unless the business combination or the acquisition of shares that resulted in a stockholder becoming an interested stockholder is approved in a prescribed manner. Generally, a “business combination” includes a merger, asset or stock sale, or other transaction resulting in a financial benefit to the interested stockholder. PayPal’s amended and restated certificate of incorporation will, however, contain a provision that generally mirrors Section 203 of the DGCL, except that an “interested shareholder” under the interested stockholder provision in the amended and restated certificate of incorporation will be defined to be a person or entity who, together with its affiliates and associates, owns (or within three years prior to the determination of interested stockholder status did own) twenty percent (20%) or more of a corporation’s voting stock (Section 203 of the DGCL sets this threshold at fifteen percent (15%)). The existence of this provision would be expected to have an anti-takeover effect with respect to transactions not approved in advance by PayPal’s board of directors, including discouraging attempts that might result in a premium over the market price for the shares of common stock held by PayPal’s stockholders.

Stockholder Action by Written Consent. PayPal’s amended and restated certificate of incorporation will provide that stockholders may not act by written consent. Stockholder action must take place at the annual or a special meeting of PayPal stockholders.

Requirements for Advance Notification of Stockholder Nominations and Proposals. PayPal’s amended and restated bylaws will establish advance notice procedures with respect to stockholder proposals and nomination of candidates for election as directors other than nominations made by or at the direction of its board of directors or a committee of its board of directors.

No Cumulative Voting. The DGCL provides that stockholders are denied the right to cumulate votes in the election of directors unless the company’s certificate of incorporation provides otherwise. PayPal’s amended and restated certificate of incorporation will not provide for cumulative voting.

Undesignated Preferred Stock. The authority that PayPal’s board of directors will possess to issue preferred stock could potentially be used to discourage attempts by third parties to obtain control of PayPal through a merger, tender offer, proxy contest or otherwise by making such attempts more difficult or more costly. PayPal’s board of directors may be able to issue preferred stock with voting rights or conversion rights that, if exercised, could adversely affect the voting power of the holders of common stock.

Certain of the provisions above, including under the sections entitled “Interested Stockholder Provision” in the “Anti-Takeover Effects of Various Provisions of Delaware Law and PayPal’s Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws” section and the section entitled “Special Stockholder Meetings” in the “Corporate Governance” section, were designed to comply with the Icahn Agreement. In addition, pursuant to the Icahn Agreement, (i) the Icahn Group has agreed to specified “standstill” restrictions for a certain period of time, and (ii) PayPal will, among other things, not have a “stockholder rights plan” in effect at the time of the distribution and, until the conclusion of the standstill period, any “stockholder rights plan” adopted by PayPal will not have a threshold at or below 19.99% and will expire if not ratified by PayPal’s stockholders within 135 days of the plan taking effect.

PayPal has applied to have its common stock authorized for listing on The NASDAQ Stock Market under the symbol “PYPL.”

On January 30, 2015, PayPal issued 1,000 shares of its common stock to eBay pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Securities Act. PayPal did not register the issuance of the issued shares under the Securities Act because such issuances did not constitute public offerings.

After the distribution, the transfer agent and registrar for PayPal’s common stock will be Computershare Trust Company, N.A.

PayPal has filed a registration statement on Form 10 with the SEC with respect to the shares of PayPal common stock being distributed as contemplated by this information statement. This information statement is a part of, and does not contain all of the information set forth in, the registration statement and the exhibits and schedules to the registration statement. For further information with respect to PayPal and its common stock, please refer to the registration statement, including its exhibits and schedules. Statements made in this information statement relating to any contract or other document filed as an exhibit to the registration statement include the material terms of such contract or other document. However, such statements are not necessarily complete, and you should refer to the exhibits attached to the registration statement for copies of the actual contract or document. You may review a copy of the registration statement, including its exhibits and schedules, at the SEC’s public reference room, located at 100 F Street, NE, Washington, D.C. 20549, by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330 as well as on the Internet website maintained by the SEC at www.sec.gov. Information contained on any website referenced in this information statement is not incorporated by reference in this information statement.

As a result of the distribution, PayPal will become subject to the information and reporting requirements of the Exchange Act and, in accordance with the Exchange Act, will file periodic reports, proxy statements and other information with the SEC.

PayPal intends to furnish holders of its common stock with annual reports containing combined financial statements prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles and audited and reported on, with an opinion expressed, by an independent registered public accounting firm.

You should rely only on the information contained in this information statement or to which this information statement has referred you. PayPal has not authorized any person to provide you with different information or to make any representation not contained in this information statement.

All other schedules have been omitted because the information required to be set forth therein is not applicable or is shown in the financial statements or notes thereto.

In our opinion, the accompanying combined balance sheets and the related combined statements of income, of comprehensive income, of equity, and of cash flows present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of PayPal (the “Company”) at December 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2014 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. In addition, in our opinion, the financial statement schedule listed in the accompanying index presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein when read in conjunction with the related combined financial statements. These financial statements and financial statement schedule are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and financial statement schedule based on our audits. We conducted our audits of these statements in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these combined financial statements.

On September 30, 2014, eBay Inc. (“eBay”) announced its intent to separate its payments business (the “Separation”) into an independent, publicly-traded company (the “distribution”). To accomplish the distribution, in January 2015, eBay incorporated PayPal Holdings, Inc. (“PayPal Holdings”). PayPal Holdings was formed solely in contemplation of the separation and the distribution, has not commenced operations and has no liabilities or commitments. As of March 31, 2015, PayPal Holdings had no assets other than de minimis assets incidental to its formation.

PayPal Holdings will ultimately become the parent of PayPal, Inc. and will hold directly or indirectly all of the assets and liabilities associated with PayPal, Inc. PayPal, Inc. was incorporated in Delaware in March 1999. In 2002, PayPal, Inc. was acquired by eBay. All of our operations are conducted by PayPal, Inc. and its wholly owned subsidiaries.

These combined financial statements are comprised of the payments business of eBay Inc., including PayPal, Inc. and certain other assets and liabilities that have been historically held at the eBay Inc. corporate level, but are specifically identifiable and attributable to the payments business. These combined financial statements are collectively referred to as “PayPal”. References in these combined financial statements to “we,” “our,” “us,” “the Company” or “PayPal” refer to these combined entities.

To effect the separation, eBay will make a pro rata distribution of 100% of the outstanding common stock of PayPal Holdings to eBay’s stockholders. The distribution is subject to a number of conditions, including, but not limited to, final approval of the spin-off by the board of both eBay Inc. and completion of the review of PayPal Holdings’ Registration Statement on Form 10 by the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). Immediately following the distribution, eBay will no longer have an ownership interest in PayPal Holdings or PayPal. PayPal Holdings and eBay will enter into certain agreements providing for the separation of the companies and governing various relationships between the companies post-separation.

We are a leading technology platform company that enables digital and mobile payments on behalf of consumers and merchants worldwide. We strive to increase our relevance for consumers, merchants, friends and family to access and move their money anywhere in the world, anytime, on any platform and through any device (e.g., mobile, tablets, personal computers or wearables). We provide safer and simpler ways for businesses of all sizes to accept payments from merchant websites, mobile devices and applications, and at offline retail locations through a wide range of payment solutions across our Payments Platform, including PayPal, PayPal Credit, Venmo and Braintree products.

We operate globally and in a rapidly evolving regulatory environment characterized by a heightened regulatory focus on all aspects of the payments industry. Government regulation impacts key aspects of our business, and we are subject to regulations that affect the payments industry in the many countries in which we operate. Changes in or non-compliance with laws and regulations, changes in the interpretation of laws and regulations, and the enactment of new laws and regulations applicable to us could have a material adverse impact on our business, results of operations and financial condition. Therefore, we monitor these areas closely to ensure a compliant system for our customers who depend on us.

The accompanying combined financial statements have been prepared on a stand-alone basis and are derived from eBay’s consolidated financial statements and records. The combined financial statements reflect our financial position, results of operations, and cash flows as we operated as part of eBay prior to the distribution, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“U.S. GAAP”).

These combined financial statements include expenses associated with workplace resources and information technology that were previously allocated to the Payments segment of eBay, and, additional expenses related to certain corporate functions, including senior management, legal, human resources and finance. These expenses also include allocations related to share based compensation. The expenses that have been incurred by eBay are allocated to us based on direct usage or benefit where identifiable, with the remainder allocated on a pro rata basis of revenue, headcount, or other systematic measure. We consider the expense allocation methodology and results to be reasonable for all periods presented. The combined financial statements also include certain assets and liabilities that have historically been held at the eBay corporate level, but which are specifically identifiable and attributable to us. The combined financial position, results of operations and cash flows of PayPal may not be indicative of our results had we been a separate stand-alone entity during the periods presented, nor are the results stated herein indicative of what the Company’s financial position, results of operations and cash flows may be in the future. All intra-company transactions and accounts have been eliminated.

The accompanying financial statements are combined and include the financial statements of PayPal and our wholly and majority-owned subsidiaries. Investments in entities where we hold at least a 20% ownership interest and have the ability to exercise significant influence, but not control, over the investee are accounted for using the equity method of accounting. For such investments, our share of the investees’ results of operations is included in other income (expense), net and our investment balance is included in long-term investments. Investments in entities where we hold less than a 20% ownership interest are generally accounted for using the cost method of accounting, and our share of the investees’ results of operations is included in other income (expense), net in our combined statement of income to the extent dividends are received.

We have evaluated all subsequent events through April 9, 2015, the date the financial statements were available to be issued. We have disclosed material subsequent events in “Note 16—Subsequent Events.”

The preparation of combined financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the combined financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses, including allocations from eBay, during the reporting period. On an ongoing basis, we evaluate our estimates, including those related to transaction and loan losses, legal contingencies, income taxes, revenue recognition, stock-based compensation, goodwill and the recoverability of intangible assets. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions which we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Cash and cash equivalents are short-term, highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less when purchased and are mainly comprised of bank deposits, certificates of deposit and commercial paper.

Short-term investments, which include time deposits and corporate debt securities with original maturities of greater than three months but less than one year when purchased, are classified as available-for-sale and are reported at fair value using the specific identification method. Unrealized gains and losses are excluded from earnings and reported as a component of other comprehensive income (loss), net of related estimated tax provisions or benefits.

Long-term investments include corporate debt securities, equity method and cost method investments. Debt securities are classified as available-for-sale and are reported at fair value using the specific identification method. Unrealized gains and losses are excluded from earnings and reported as a component of other comprehensive income (loss), net of related estimated tax provisions or benefits.

We elect to account for certain assets underlying customer accounts, including foreign-currency denominated available-for-sale investments, under the fair value option. The changes in fair value related to initial measurement and subsequent changes in fair value are included in earnings as a component of other income (expense), net.

Our cost method investments consist of investments in privately held companies where we do not have the ability to exercise significant influence, or have control over the investee. These investments are recorded at cost and are subject to periodic tests for other-than-temporary impairment. Our equity method investments are investments in privately held companies where we have the ability to exercise significant influence, but not control, over the investee. Our proportionate share of the net income (loss) of our equity method investments is recognized on a one quarter lag as a component of other income (expense), net in our combined statements of income. Our share of investees’ results of operations is not significant for any period presented.

We assess whether an other-than-temporary impairment loss on our investments has occurred due to declines in fair value or other market conditions. With respect to our debt securities, this assessment takes into account the severity and duration of the decline in value, our intent to sell the security, whether it is more likely than not we will be required to sell the security before recovery of its amortized cost basis, and whether we expect to recover the entire amortized cost basis of the security (that is, whether a credit loss exists).

Loans and interest receivable, net primarily represent consumer receivables originated under PayPal Credit consumer accounts. The majority of the loans on these accounts are originated by a partner chartered financial institution in the U.S. and are made to individual consumers in the U.S. using PayPal Credit as a payment method. In the United Kingdom, loans on PayPal Credit consumer accounts are currently originated by our Luxembourg bank subsidiary.

The terms of our consumer relationships require us to submit monthly bills to the consumer detailing loan repayment requirements. The terms also allow us to charge the consumer interest and fees in certain circumstances. Due to the relatively small dollar amount of individual loans and interest receivable, we do not require collateral on these balances.

In August 2013, ownership of substantially all of the existing PayPal Credit consumer accounts in the U.S. was transitioned from one partner chartered financial institution to a new partner chartered financial institution. See “Note 8—Loans and Interest Receivable, Net”. As of Q4 2014, this partner financial institution owned all of the existing PayPal Credit consumer accounts in the U.S. As part of the arrangement with this new partner financial institution, we sell a participation interest in the entire pool of consumer receivables outstanding to this partner

financial institution. We apply a control-oriented, financial-components approach and account for the asset transfer as a sale and derecognize the portion of the participation interest for which control has been surrendered. We do not recognize gains or losses on the sale of the participation interest as the carrying amount of the participation interest sold approximates the fair value at time of transfer. Participation interests that are retained are included in loans and interest receivable and are accounted for at amortized cost, net of an allowance for loan losses. We maintain the servicing rights for the entire pool of consumer receivables outstanding and receive a fee approximating the fair value of servicing the assets underlying the participation interest sold.

The allowance for loans and interest receivable represents management’s estimate of probable losses inherent in our PayPal Credit portfolio of receivables. The evaluation process to assess the adequacy of allowances is subject to numerous estimates and judgments, primarily forecasted principal balance delinquency rates (“roll rates”). Roll rates are the percentage of balances which we estimate will migrate from one stage of delinquency to the next based on our historical experience, as well as external factors such as estimated bankruptcies and levels of unemployment. Roll rates are applied to principal balances for each stage of delinquency, from current to 180 days past due, in order to estimate the principal loans which are probable to be charged off. Increases to the allowance for loans receivable are reflected as transaction and loan losses in our combined financial statements. The allowance for loss against the interest and fees receivable is primarily determined by applying historical average customer account roll rates to the interest receivable balance in each stage of delinquency to project the value of accounts that are not collectible. Increases to the allowance for interest and fees receivable are reflected as a reduction of net revenues in our combined financial statements.

We charge off loan receivable balances in the month in which a customer balance becomes 180 days past due. Bankrupt accounts are charged off within 60 days of receiving notification from the bankruptcy courts. Past due loans receivable continue to accrue interest until such time as they are charged off. Charge-offs that are recovered are recorded as a reduction to our allowance for loans and interest receivable.

We hold all customer balances (both in the U.S. and internationally) as direct claims against us which are reflected on our combined balance sheet as a liability classified as amounts due to customers. Further, various jurisdictions where PayPal operates require us to hold eligible liquid assets, as defined by the regulators in these jurisdictions, equal to at least 100% of the aggregate amount of all customer balances. Therefore, we use the assets underlying the customer balances to meet these regulatory requirements and separately classify the assets as customer accounts in our combined balance sheets. We do not commingle the assets underlying the customer balances with corporate funds and separately maintain these assets in interest and non-interest bearing bank deposits, time deposits and government and agency securities. We classify the assets underlying the customer balances as current based on their purpose and availability to fulfill our direct obligation under amounts due to customers.

Funds receivable and funds payable arise due to the time required to clear transactions through external payment networks. When customers fund their account using their bank account or a credit card or debit card, or withdraw funds from their PayPal account to their bank account or through a debit card transaction, there is a clearing period before the cash is received or settled, usually one to three business days for U.S. transactions and generally up to five business days for international transactions.

Negative customer balances occur primarily when there are insufficient funds in a customer’s PayPal account to cover charges applied for Automated Clearing House (“ACH”) returns, debit card transactions, chargebacks, nondelivery or unsatisfactory delivery of goods or services. Negative balances can be cured by the customer by adding funds to the account, receiving payments, or through back-up funding sources. We also utilize third party collection agents. For negative customer balances that are not expected to be cured or otherwise collected, we provide an allowance for uncollectible accounts. The allowance is estimated based on known facts and circumstances, internal factors including our experience with similar cases, and historical trends involving collection and write-off patterns. Negative customer balances are included in other current assets, net of the allowance. Adjustments to the allowance for negative customer balances are recorded as a component of transaction and loan loss. The allowance for negative customer balances was $118 million and $88 million at December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively.

Property and equipment consists primarily of computer equipment, software and website development costs, land and buildings and leasehold improvements. Property and equipment are stated at historical cost less accumulated depreciation. Depreciation and amortization are computed using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets; generally, one to three years for computer equipment and software, including capitalized software and website development costs, three years for furniture and fixtures, up to thirty years for buildings and building improvements, and the shorter of five years or the term of the lease for leasehold improvements.

Goodwill is tested for impairment at a minimum on an annual basis. Goodwill is tested for impairment at the reporting unit level by first performing a qualitative assessment to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of the reporting unit is less than its carrying value. If the reporting unit does not pass the qualitative assessment, then the reporting unit’s carrying value is compared to its fair value. The fair values of the reporting units are estimated using income and market approaches. Goodwill is considered impaired if the carrying value of the reporting unit exceeds its fair value. The discounted cash flow method, a form of the income approach, uses expected future operating results and a market participant discount rate. The market approach uses comparable company prices and other relevant information generated by market transactions (either publicly traded entities or merger and acquisitions) to develop pricing metrics to be applied to historical and expected future operating results of the reporting unit. Failure to achieve these expected results, changes in the discount rate or market pricing metrics, may cause a future impairment of goodwill at the reporting unit. We conducted our annual impairment test of goodwill as of August 31, 2014 and 2013. We determined that no adjustment to the carrying value of goodwill of our reporting unit was required. As of December 31, 2014, we determined that no events or circumstances from August 31, 2014 through December 31, 2014 indicated that a further assessment was necessary.

Intangible assets consist of purchased customer lists and user base, marketing related intangibles, developed technologies and other intangible assets, including patents and contractual agreements. Intangible assets are amortized over the period of estimated benefit using the straight-line method and estimated useful lives ranging from one to eight years. No significant residual value is estimated for intangible assets.

We evaluate long-lived assets (including intangible assets) for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of a long-lived asset may not be recoverable. An asset is considered impaired if its carrying amount exceeds the future net cash flow the asset is expected to generate.

We are exposed to transaction losses due to credit card and other payment misuse as well as nonperformance of and credit losses from sellers who accept payments through PayPal. We establish an allowance for estimated losses arising from processing customer transactions, such as chargebacks for unauthorized credit card use and merchant-related chargebacks due to non-delivery of goods or services, ACH returns, buyer protection program claims, account takeovers, and debit card overdrafts. This allowance represents an accumulation of the estimated amounts necessary to provide for transaction losses incurred as of the reporting date, including those for which we have not yet identified. The allowance, which involves the use of actuarial techniques, is monitored monthly and is updated based on actual claims data reported by our claims processors and other actual data received. The allowance is based on known facts and circumstances, internal factors including experience with similar cases, historical trends involving loss payment patterns, and the mix of transaction and loss types. Additions to the allowance are reflected as transaction and loan losses in our combined statements of income. At both December 31, 2014 and 2013, the allowance for transaction losses totaled $48 million and is included in accrued expenses and other current liabilities.

We have significant international revenues and costs denominated in foreign currencies, subjecting our operations to foreign currency risk. We enter into foreign currency exchange contracts that qualify as cash flow hedges, generally with maturities of 18 months or less, to reduce the volatility of cash flows primarily related to forecasted revenue denominated in certain foreign currencies. All outstanding derivatives are recognized on the balance sheet at fair value. The effective portion of the designated derivative’s gain or loss is initially reported as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) and is subsequently reclassified into the financial statement line item in which the hedged item is recorded in the period the forecasted transaction affects earnings.

We also hedge our economic exposure to foreign currency denominated monetary assets and liabilities with foreign currency contracts. The gains and losses on the foreign exchange contracts economically offset transaction gains and losses on certain foreign currency denominated monetary assets and liabilities recognized in earnings. Accordingly, these outstanding non-designated derivatives are recognized on the balance sheet at fair value and changes in fair value from these contracts are recorded in other income (expense), net in the combined statement of income. Our hedging program is not designed or operated for trading or speculative purposes.

Our derivative instruments expose us to credit risk to the extent counterparties may be unable to meet the terms of the agreements. We seek to mitigate this risk by limiting counterparties to major financial institutions and by spreading the risk across several major financial institutions. In addition, the potential risk of loss with one counterparty resulting from this type of credit risk is monitored on an ongoing basis. See “Note 6—Derivative Instruments” for additional information related to the derivative instruments.

exchange markets involving identical assets. Level 2 instrument valuations are obtained from readily available pricing sources for comparable instruments, identical instruments in less active markets, or models using market observable inputs. As of December 31, 2014, and 2013 we did not have any assets or liabilities requiring measurement at fair value without observable market values that would require a high level of judgment to determine fair value (Level 3). Our financial instruments, including cash, cash equivalents, accounts receivable, loans and interest receivable, funds receivable, certain customer accounts, accounts payable, and funds payable and amounts due to customers are carried at cost, which approximates their fair value due to the short-term maturity of these instruments.

Our cash, cash equivalents, accounts receivable, loans and interest receivable, and funds receivable and customer accounts are potentially subject to concentration of credit risk. Cash, cash equivalents and customer accounts are placed with financial institutions that management believes are of high credit quality. In addition, funds receivable are generated primarily with financial institutions or credit card companies which management believes are of high credit quality. We invest our cash and cash equivalents and customer accounts in highly liquid, highly rated instruments which are uninsured. From time to time, we may also have corporate deposit balances with financial services institutions which exceed the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) insurance limit of $250,000. As part of our cash management process, we perform periodic evaluations of the relative credit standing of these financial institutions. Our accounts receivable are derived from revenue earned from customers located in the U.S. and internationally. Our loans and interest receivable are derived primarily from consumer financing activities for customers located in the U.S. As of December 31, 2014 no customer accounted for more than 10% of net accounts receivable or net loans receivable. As of December 31, 2013, one customer accounted for more than 13% of the net accounts receivable balance and no customer accounted for more than 10% of net loans receivable. During the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012, no customer accounted for more than 10% of net revenues. During the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012, we earned approximately 29%, 32% and 33% of revenue from customers on eBay’s Marketplaces platform.

We earn net revenues primarily from fees charged to customers on the volume of activity processed through our Payments Platform. Net transaction revenues resulting from a payment processing transaction are recognized once the transaction is complete. Based on historical experience, specified credits are made at the time revenue is recognized and recorded as a reduction to revenue. In certain circumstances, we are required to record payments to a customer as a reduction to revenue. These payments to customers primarily originate from certain customer acquisition arrangements. Net revenues include intercompany revenue earned from eBay for payment processing services.

We also earn net revenues from other value added services, including interest and fees earned on the PayPal Credit portfolio of loans receivable, subscription fees, revenue share we earn through partnerships and other services that we provide to our consumers and merchants.

Interest and fees earned on the PayPal Credit portfolio of loans receivable are computed and recognized based on contractual interest and fee rates, and are net of any required reserves and amortization of deferred origination costs.

Net revenues earned from other value added services are recognized over the period services are performed and when amounts are deemed to be fixed or determinable.

We expense the cost of producing advertisements at the time production occurs and expense the cost of communicating advertisements in the period during which the advertising space or airtime is used as sales and marketing expense. Internet advertising expenses are recognized based on the terms of the individual agreements, which is generally over the greater of the ratio of the number of impressions delivered over the total number of contracted impressions, on a pay-per-click basis, or on a straight-line basis over the term of the contract. Advertising expense totaled $272 million, $176 million and $193 million for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013, and 2012, respectively.

Direct costs incurred to develop software for internal use and website development costs are capitalized and amortized over an estimated useful life of one to three years and are recorded as depreciation and amortization. PayPal capitalized $200 million and $146 million of internally developed software and website development costs for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively. Amortization expense of previously capitalized amounts was $129 million, $97 million and $91 million for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively. Costs related to the maintenance of internal use software and website development costs are expensed as incurred.

We have a defined contribution savings plan in the U.S. which qualifies under Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code (the “Code”). Our non U.S. employees are covered by other savings plans. Expenses related to our defined contribution savings plans are recorded when services are rendered by our employees.

Our employees are eligible to participate in eBay’s equity incentive plans. eBay issues two types of stock-based awards to our employees: restricted stock units (including performance-based restricted stock units) and stock options. eBay primarily issues restricted stock units. We determine compensation expense associated with restricted stock units based on the fair value of eBay’s common stock on the date of grant. We determine compensation expense associated with stock options based on the estimated grant date fair value method using the Black-Scholes valuation model. We generally recognize compensation expense using a straight-line amortization method over the respective vesting period for awards that are ultimately expected to vest. Accordingly, stock-based compensation expense for 2014, 2013 and 2012 has been reduced for estimated forfeitures. When estimating forfeitures, we consider voluntary termination behavior of our employees as well as trends of actual option forfeitures.

Most of our foreign subsidiaries use the local currency of their respective countries as their functional currency. Assets and liabilities are translated at exchange rates prevailing at the balance sheet dates. Revenues, costs and expenses are translated into U.S. dollars using daily exchange rates. Gains and losses resulting from the translation of our combined balance sheet are recorded as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income.

Gains and losses from foreign currency transactions are recognized as other income (expense), net.

We account for income taxes using an asset and liability approach which requires the recognition of taxes payable or refundable for the current year and deferred tax liabilities and assets for the future tax consequences of events that have been recognized in the financial statements or tax returns. The measurement of current and deferred tax assets and liabilities is based on provisions of enacted tax laws; the effects of future changes in tax laws or rates are not anticipated. If necessary, the measurement of deferred tax assets is reduced by the amount of any tax benefits that are not expected to be realized based on available evidence. We report a liability for unrecognized tax benefits resulting from uncertain tax positions taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. We recognize interest and penalties, if any, related to unrecognized tax benefits in income tax expense.

In 2013, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued new accounting guidance clarifying the accounting for the release of a cumulative translation adjustment into net income when a parent either sells a part or all of its investment in a foreign entity or no longer holds a controlling financial interest in a subsidiary or group of assets that is a nonprofit activity or a business within a foreign entity. The new standard was effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning on or after December 15, 2013. The adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on our financial statements.

In 2013, the FASB issued new accounting guidance clarifying the accounting for obligations resulting from joint and several liability arrangements for which the total amount under the arrangement is fixed at the reporting date. The new standard was effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning on or after December 15, 2013. The adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on our financial statements.

In 2013, the FASB issued new accounting guidance requiring the presentation of certain unrecognized tax benefits as reductions to deferred tax assets rather than as liabilities in the combined balance sheets when a net operating loss carryforward, a similar tax loss, or a tax credit carryforward exists. The new standard required adoption on a prospective basis in the first quarter of 2014. The adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on our financial statements.

In 2014, the FASB issued new guidance related to pushdown accounting. The new guidance provides an acquired entity with an option to apply pushdown accounting in its separate financial statements upon occurrence of an event in which an acquirer obtains control of the acquired entity. The amendments are effective on November 18, 2014. We adopted this guidance, as required, on November 18, 2014. The adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on our financial statements.

In 2014, the FASB issued new accounting guidance related to revenue recognition. This new standard will replace all current U.S. GAAP guidance on this topic and eliminate all industry-specific guidance. The new revenue recognition guidance provides a unified model to determine when and how revenue is recognized. The core principle is that a company should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration for which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. This guidance will be effective beginning January 1, 2017 and can be applied either retrospectively to each period presented or as a cumulative-effect adjustment as of the date of adoption. We are evaluating the impact and approach to adopting this new accounting guidance on our financial statements.

We completed the acquisition of Braintree on December 19, 2013. We acquired Braintree to accelerate PayPal’s growth in mobile payments for total consideration of approximately $713 million, consisting primarily of cash. The allocation of purchase consideration resulted in approximately $126 million of intangible assets, net liabilities of approximately $16 million, and initial goodwill of $590 million, which was adjusted by $13 million in 2014. We do not expect goodwill to be deductible for income tax purposes.

We have included the financial results of Braintree in our combined financial statements from the date of acquisition. Revenues and expenses related to Braintree for the period ending December 31, 2013 were not material.

We completed two other acquisitions during 2013 for aggregate purchase consideration of approximately $16 million, consisting primarily of cash. The allocation of the purchase consideration resulted in net liabilities of approximately $1 million, purchased intangible assets of approximately $5 million and goodwill of approximately $12 million. The combined financial statements include the operating results of the acquired businesses since the respective dates of the acquisitions. Pro forma results of operations have not been presented because the effect of the acquisitions was not material to our financial results.

In 2012, we completed one acquisition for purchase consideration of approximately $10 million, consisting primarily of cash. The allocation of the purchase consideration resulted in net liabilities of approximately $1 million, purchased intangible assets of $3 million and goodwill of $8 million. The combined financial statements include the operating results of the acquisition from the date of acquisition. Pro forma results of operations have not been presented because the effect of this acquisition was not material to our combined results of operations.

The following table presents goodwill balances and adjustments to those balances for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013:

The goodwill acquired in 2013 was due primarily to the acquisition of Braintree.

All identifiable intangible assets are subject to amortization and no significant residual value is estimated for the intangible assets. Amortization expense for intangible assets was $84 million, $70 million and $67 million for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

Expected future intangible asset amortization as of December 31, 2014 is as follows (in millions):

At December 31, 2014 and 2013, the estimated fair value of our short-term and long-term investments classified as available for sale, are as follows:

We had no material short-term and long-term investments that have been in a continuous unrealized loss position for greater than 12 months as of December 31, 2014 and 2013. Amounts reclassified to earnings from unrealized gains and losses were not material in 2014 and 2013.

We have made multiple equity and cost method investments which are reported in long-term investments on our combined balance sheet. As of December 31, 2014 and 2013, our equity and cost method investments totaled $31 million and $146 million, respectively. During 2014, we entered an agreement to dissolve a joint venture. As a result of the termination, we recorded an other-than-temporary impairment loss in our investment in the joint venture. Further, as part of the termination agreement, our obligation to contribute a portion of our business was terminated. This termination resulted in a reduction of our recognized liability related to this obligation. The impact of impairing our investment and de-recognizing the corresponding obligation to the joint venture was recorded as other income and expense and was not material to our results.

The following table summarizes our financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of December 31, 2014 and 2013:

Our financial assets and liabilities are valued using market prices on both active markets (level 1) and less active markets (level 2). Level 1 instrument valuations are obtained from real-time quotes for transactions in active exchange markets involving identical assets. Level 2 instrument valuations are obtained from readily available pricing sources for comparable instruments, identical instruments in less active markets, or models using market observable inputs. The majority of our derivative instruments are valued using pricing models that take into account the contract terms as well as multiple inputs where applicable, such as equity prices, interest rate yield curves, option volatility and currency rates. Our derivative instruments are primarily short-term in nature, generally one month to one year in duration. Certain foreign currency contracts designated as cash flow hedges may have a duration of up to 18 months. We did not have any transfers of financial instruments between valuation levels during 2014 or 2013. As of December 31, 2014 and 2013 we did not have any assets or liabilities requiring measurement at fair value without observable market values that would require a high level of judgment to determine fair value (Level 3).

Cash and cash equivalents are short-term, highly liquid investments with original or remaining maturities of three months or less when purchased and are comprised primarily of bank deposits and commercial paper. We had total funds receivable and customer accounts of $10.6 billion and $9.3 billion as of December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively, of which $4.2 billion and $3.6 billion, respectively, was invested primarily in short-term investments. We elect to account for certain customer accounts, including foreign-currency denominated available-for-sale investments, under the fair value option. Election of the fair value option allows us to significantly reduce the accounting asymmetry that would otherwise arise when recognizing foreign exchange gains and losses relating to available-for-sale investments and the corresponding customer liabilities.

Our derivative instruments are valued using pricing models that take into account the contract terms as well as multiple inputs where applicable, such as equity prices, interest rate yield curves, option volatility, and currency rates. Our derivative instruments are primarily short-term in nature, and are one month to eighteen months in duration. We did not have any transfers of financial instruments between valuation levels during 2014 or 2013.

Our primary objective in holding derivatives is to reduce the volatility of earnings and cash flows associated with changes in foreign currency exchange rates. Our derivatives expose us to credit risk to the extent that our counterparties may be unable to meet the terms of the arrangement. We seek to mitigate such risk by limiting our counterparties to, and by spreading the risk across, major financial institutions. In addition, the potential risk of loss with any one counterparty resulting from this type of credit risk is monitored on an ongoing basis.

We transact business in various foreign currencies and have significant international revenues as well as costs denominated in foreign currencies, which subjects us to foreign currency risk. We use foreign currency exchange contracts, generally with maturities of 18 months or less, to reduce the volatility of cash flows primarily related to forecasted revenues, expenses, assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies. The objective of the foreign exchange contracts is to help mitigate the risk that the U.S. dollar-equivalent cash flows are not adversely affected by changes in the applicable U.S. dollar/foreign currency exchange rate. For derivative instruments that are designated as cash flow hedges, the effective portion of the derivative’s gain or loss is initially reported as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) and subsequently reclassified into earnings in the same period the forecasted transaction affects earnings. The ineffective portion of the unrealized gains and losses on these contracts, if any, is recorded immediately in earnings. We evaluate the effectiveness of our foreign exchange contracts on a quarterly basis. We do not use any foreign exchange contracts for trading purposes.

For our derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges, the amounts recognized in earnings related to the ineffective portion were not material in each of the periods presented, and we did not exclude any component of the changes in fair value of the derivative instruments from the assessment of hedge effectiveness. As of December 31, 2014, we estimated that $113 million of net derivative gains related to our cash flow hedges included in accumulated other comprehensive income will be reclassified into earnings within the next 12 months.

The fair value of our outstanding derivative instruments as of December 31, 2014 and 2013 was as follows:

Under the master netting agreements with the respective counterparties to our foreign exchange contracts, subject to applicable requirements, we are allowed to net settle transactions of the same type with a single net amount payable by one party to the other. However, we have elected to present the derivative assets and derivative liabilities on a gross basis in our balance sheet. As of December 31, 2014, the potential effect of rights of set-off associated with the above foreign exchange contracts would be an offset to both assets and liabilities by $6 million, resulting in net derivative assets of $129 million and net derivative liabilities of $1 million. We are not required to pledge, nor are we entitled to receive cash collateral related to these derivative transactions.

The following tables summarize the activity of derivative contracts that qualify for hedge accounting as of December 31, 2014 and 2013, and the impact of designated derivative instruments on accumulated other comprehensive income for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013:

The following table provides the location in the financial statements of the recognized gains or losses related to our derivative instruments:

instruments. The notional amount is generally not exchanged, but is used only as the basis on which the value of foreign exchange payments under these contracts is determined. The following table provides the notional amounts of our outstanding derivatives:

Depreciation expense was $432 million in 2014, $383 million in 2013 and $315 million in 2012.

Loans and interest receivable primarily represent consumer receivables originated under PayPal Credit consumer accounts. The majority of the loans on these accounts are originated by a partner chartered financial institutions in the U.S. and are made to individual consumers in the U.S. using PayPal Credit as a payment method. In the United Kingdom, the loans on PayPal Credit consumer accounts are currently originated by our Luxembourg bank subsidiary. Although a partner chartered financial institution continues to own each PayPal Credit consumer account in the U.S., we own the related consumer receivable and are responsible for all servicing functions related to the customer accounts. In August 2013, ownership of substantially all of the existing customer accounts in the U.S. was transitioned from one partner chartered financial institution to a new partner chartered financial institution. As of Q4 2014, this new partner financial institution owns all of the existing PayPal Credit consumer accounts in the U.S. As part of the arrangement with this new chartered financial institution, we sell a participation interest in the entire pool of consumer receivables outstanding associated with the PayPal Credit consumer accounts to this partner financial institution. We do not sell a participating interest in loans on international PayPal Credit consumer accounts issued directly by our Luxembourg bank subsidiary.

During 2014 and 2013, we purchased approximately $5.3 billion and $4.1 billion, respectively, in consumer receivables. As of December 31, 2014 and 2013, the total outstanding balance of this pool of consumer

receivables was $3.7 billion, and $2.9 billion, respectively, of which we sold a participation interest to the new chartered financial institution of $163 million or 4.4% and $65 million or 2.2%, respectively. The chartered financial institution has no recourse related to its participation interest for failure of debtors to pay when due. The participation interest held by the charted financial institution has the same priority to the interests held by us and is subject to the same credit, prepayment, and interest rate risk associated with this pool of consumer receivables.

Loans and interest receivable are reported at their outstanding principal balances, net of participation interest sold and pro-rata allowances, including unamortized deferred origination costs and estimated collectible interest and fees. We use a consumer’s FICO score, among other measures, in evaluating the credit quality of our consumer receivables. A FICO score is a type of credit score that lenders use to assess an applicant’s credit risk and whether to extend credit. Individual FICO scores generally are obtained each quarter the consumer has an outstanding consumer receivable owned by PayPal Credit. The weighted average consumer FICO score related to our loans and interest receivable balance outstanding at December 31, 2014 was 687 compared to 688 at December 31, 2013.

The following table presents the principal amount of loans and interest receivable segmented by a FICO score range:

The following tables presents the delinquency status of the principal amount of loans and interest receivable:

The following table summarizes the activity in the allowance for loans and interest receivable:

During 2013, we launched a program working with a chartered financial institution to offer working capital advances to select merchant sellers in the U.S. We subsequently purchase the related merchant receivable from the chartered financial institution. Under the program, participating merchants can borrow a certain percentage of their annual payment volume processed by PayPal and are charged a fixed fee for the loan. In 2014, we have extended this program to a limited number of international markets whereby we grant working capital advances to merchants directly through our Luxembourg bank subsidiary or through other PayPal affiliates. The total net receivable outstanding as of December 31, 2014 and 2013 was approximately $99 million and $17 million, respectively.

We determine operating segments based on how our chief operating decision maker manages the business, including making operating decisions, deciding how to allocate resources and evaluating operating performance. Our chief operating decision-maker is our Chief Executive Officer who reviews our operating results on a consolidated basis. We operate in one segment and have one reportable segment.

The following tables summarize the allocation of net revenues and long-lived assets based on geography:

consumer and merchant each reside. Net revenues earned from value added services are typically attributed to the country in which either the consumer or the merchant reside. Long-lived assets attributed to the U.S. and international geographies are based upon the country in which the asset is located or owned.

Information regarding net revenues by major products and services for 2014, 2013 and 2012, is as follows:

As of December 31, 2014, approximately $20.2 billion of unused credit was available to PayPal Credit account holders. While this amount represents the total unused credit available, we have not experienced, and do not anticipate, that all of our PayPal Credit account holders will access their entire available credit at any given point in time. In addition, the individual lines of credit that make up this unused credit are subject to periodic review and termination by the chartered financial institutions that are the issuer of PayPal Credit products based on, among other things, account usage and customer creditworthiness.

In June 2014, we agreed, subject to certain conditions, that we, one of our affiliates or a third party partner will purchase a portfolio of consumer loan receivables relating to the customer accounts arising out of our current credit program agreement with Synchrony (formerly GE Capital Retail Bank) for a price based on the book value of the consumer loan receivables portfolio at the time of the purchase (expected to be fourth quarter of 2016), subject to certain adjustments and exclusions. As of December 31, 2014, Synchrony had a net receivables portfolio under the credit program agreement of approximately $1.5 billion.

We have lease obligations under certain noncancelable operating leases. Future minimum rental payments under noncancelable operating leases at December 31, 2014, are as follows:

Rent expense for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012 totaled $43 million, $44 million and $39 million, respectively. The future minimum lease payments include the minimum commitments for facilities occupied by PayPal.

We are involved in legal and regulatory proceedings on an ongoing basis. Many of these proceedings are in early stages, and may seek an indeterminate amount of damages. If we believe that a loss arising from such matters is probable and can be reasonably estimated, we accrue the estimated liability in our financial statements. If only a range of estimated losses can be determined, we accrue an amount within the range that, in our judgment, reflects the most likely outcome; if none of the estimates within that range is a better estimate than any other amount, we accrue the low end of the range. For those proceedings in which an unfavorable outcome is reasonably possible but not probable, we have disclosed an estimate of the reasonably possible loss or range of losses or we have concluded that an estimate of the reasonably possible loss or range arising directly from the proceeding (i.e., monetary damages or amounts paid in judgment or settlement) are not material. If we cannot estimate the probable or reasonably possible loss or range of losses arising from a legal proceeding, we have disclosed that fact. In assessing the materiality of a legal proceeding, we evaluate, among other factors, the amount of monetary damages claimed, as well as the potential impact of non-monetary remedies sought by plaintiffs (e.g., injunctive relief) that may require us to change our business practices in a manner that could have a material adverse impact on our business. With respect to the matters disclosed in this Note 10, we are unable to estimate the possible loss or range of losses that could potentially result from the application of such non-monetary remedies.

Amounts accrued for legal and regulatory proceedings for which we believe a loss is probable were not material for the year ended December 31, 2014. Except as otherwise noted for the proceedings described in this Note 10, we have concluded, based on currently available information, that reasonably possible losses arising directly from the proceedings (i.e., monetary damages or amounts paid in judgment or settlement) in excess of our recorded accruals are also not material. However, legal and regulatory proceedings are inherently unpredictable and subject to significant uncertainties. If one or more matters were resolved against us in a reporting period for amounts in excess of management’s expectations, the impact on our operating results or financial condition for that reporting period could be material.

We routinely report to the U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (“OFAC”) on payments we have rejected or blocked pursuant to OFAC sanctions regulations and on any possible violations of those regulations. We have cooperated with OFAC in recent years regarding our review process over transaction monitoring and have self-reported a large number of small dollar amount transactions that could possibly be in violation of OFAC sanctions regulations. Beginning in September 2014, we have engaged in settlement discussions with OFAC regarding the possible violations arising from our practices between 2009 and 2013 as a result of which we have accrued reserves we believe are adequate to cover any findings of violation. In addition, we continue to cooperate with OFAC regarding more recent self-reported transactions that could also possibly be in violation of OFAC sanctions regulations. Such self-reported transactions could result in claims or actions against us including litigation, injunctions, damage awards or require us to change our business practices that could result in a material loss, require significant management time, result in the diversion of significant operational resources or otherwise harm our business.

On August 7, 2013 and January 13, 2014, eBay, PayPal and certain wholly owned subsidiaries of PayPal received Civil Investigative Demands (“CIDs”) from the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (“CFPB”) requesting that we provide testimony, produce documents and provide information relating primarily to the acquisition, management, and operation of our PayPal Credit products, including online credit products and services, advertising, loan origination, customer acquisition, servicing, debt collection, and complaints handling

practices. The CIDs could lead to an enforcement action and/or one or more significant consent orders, which may result in substantial costs, including legal fees, fines, penalties and remediation expenses. We are cooperating with the CFPB in connection with the CIDs and exploring whether we may be able to resolve these inquiries. Resolution of these inquiries could require us to make monetary payments to certain customers, pay fines and/or change the manner in which we operate the PayPal Credit products, which could adversely affect our financial results and results of operations.

are indemnities mainly related to intellectual property rights. We have also provided an indemnity to our payments processors in the event of certain third-party claims or card association fines against the processor arising out of conduct by us or our customers. It is not possible to determine the maximum potential loss under these indemnification provisions due to our limited history of prior indemnification claims and the unique facts and circumstances involved in each particular provision. To date, no significant costs have been incurred, either individually or collectively, in connection with our indemnification provisions.

As of December 31, 2014 and 2013, we had no off-balance sheet arrangements that have, or are reasonably likely to have, a current or future material effect on our combined financial condition, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources.

eBay Inc. has a cash pooling arrangement with a financial institution for cash management purposes. We participate in this arrangement, which allows for cash withdrawals from this financial institution based upon eBay’s aggregate operating cash balances within the same financial institution (“Aggregate Cash Deposits”). This arrangement also allows eBay to withdraw amounts exceeding the Aggregate Cash Deposits up to an agreed-upon limit. The net balance of the withdrawals and the Aggregate Cash Deposits is used by the financial institution as a basis for calculating eBay’s net interest expense or income. As of December 31, 2014, we had $1.6 billion relating to cash held in this pooling arrangement.

In August 2009, we entered into a two-way Cash Management and Zero Balance Cash Sharing Agreement (“Cash Sharing Agreement”) with eBay in which our excess U.S. funds are swept to eBay on a daily basis. The main purpose of the Cash Sharing Agreement is to implement a centralized cash management structure to effectively manage U.S. Dollar cash, to leverage administrative efficiencies, and to centralize the investment/borrowing of cash and settlement of payables and receivables at the eBay level. Since the Cash Sharing Agreement is two-way, we can receive funds back from eBay as needed. The rate earned on funds lent to eBay is the average daily LIBOR USD 1-month rate plus 20 basis points. The balance due from eBay and reported in notes and receivable from affiliates in our combined balance sheet was $559 million and $178 million at December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively. Interest income earned on the arrangement was reported in other income (expense), net but was not material in any period presented.

In November 2008, we entered into an intercompany loan agreement with eBay in which the acquisition of receivables related to PayPal Credit accounts are funded through eBay’s existing financing arrangements at an interest rate of 1.2% and 1.4% for December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively. At December 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, the loan balance included in notes and payable to affiliates in our combined balance sheet was $809 million and $850 million, respectively. The interest expense incurred during the year ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012 was $11 million, $11 million and $9 million respectively.

In May 2012, we entered into an intercompany loan agreement with eBay whereby we loaned eBay $36 million at an interest rate of 0.6% per annum during the term of the loan. The loan was repaid on September, 2014. Interest income earned on the arrangement was reported in other income (expense), net but was not material in any period presented.

balance included in notes and payable to affiliates in our combined balance sheet was $56 million. The interest expense incurred during the year ended December 31, 2014 was $2 million and is included in other income (expense), net.

In September 2014, we entered into an intercompany loan agreement with eBay whereby we borrowed $10 million from eBay for 6 months at an interest rate of 1.2% per annum. The loan is included in notes and payable to affiliates on our combined balance sheet in 2014. Interest income earned on the arrangement was reported in other income (expense), net but was not material in any period presented.

In October 2014, we entered into an intercompany loan agreement with eBay whereby we loaned eBay 580 million Indian Rupee for 6 months at an interest rate of 9.4% per annum. The balance due from eBay and reported in notes and receivable from affiliates in our combined balance sheet was $9 million at December 31, 2014. Interest income earned on the arrangement was reported in other income (expense), net but was not material in the periods presented.

In December 2014, we entered into an intercompany loan agreement with eBay whereby we loaned eBay 500 million Indian Rupee for 6 months at an interest rate of 9.0% per annum. The balance due from eBay and reported in notes and receivable from affiliates in our combined balance sheet was $8 million at December 31, 2014. Interest income earned on the arrangement was reported in other income (expense) but was not material during the periods presented.

All other contracts with related parties are at rates and terms that we believe are comparable with those that could be entered into with independent third parties. There were no other material related party transactions in the periods presented. As of December 31, 2014, there were no other material amounts payable to or amounts receivable from related parties. Post separation, we will no longer participate in cash management and intercompany funding arrangements with eBay.

Net revenues include $113 million, $92 million and $84 million earned from eBay and its subsidiaries for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

We recover costs from eBay relating to customer protection programs offered on qualifying eBay purchases made with PayPal. These costs include the actual transaction losses associated with customer filed claims as well as an allocation of salary related expenses for customer support teams working on customer claims and disputes related to on eBay purchases. Recoveries associated with transaction losses incurred on eligible eBay purchases during the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012 were $43 million, $48 million and $36 million, respectively, which were recorded as a reduction to transaction and loan loss. Other costs recovered from eBay related to the customer protection program for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012, were $22 million, $19 million and $17 million, respectively, and are included as a reduction to customer support and operations and general and administrative expenses in our combined statement of income.

We incur user acquisition fees from eBay on payment volume which we process from purchases made on eBay’s platform. User acquisition fees for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012, were $119 million, $109 million, and $95 million, respectively, and are included within sales and marketing.

revenue, headcount, or other systematic measure. We consider the expense allocation methodology and results to be reasonable for all periods presented. The corporate costs and allocation of expenses to us from eBay included within customer support and operations, sales and marketing, product development, and general and administrative expenses were $443 million, $410 million and $372 million for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively, of which $207 million, $183 million and $168 million were included in general and administrative expenses.

eBay has equity incentive plans under which it grants equity awards, including stock options, restricted stock units, performance-based restricted stock units and performance share units, to our directors, officers and employees. At December 31, 2014, eBay had 720 million shares authorized under its equity incentive plans and 52 million shares were available for future grant.

Stock options granted under these plans generally vest 12.5% six months from the date of grant (or 25% one year from the date of grant for grants to new employees) with the remainder vesting at a rate of 2.08% per month thereafter, and generally expire seven to ten years from the date of grant. The cost of stock options is determined using the Black-Scholes option pricing model on the date of grant.

Restricted stock units granted under eBay’s equity incentive plans generally vest in equal annual installments over a period of three to five years, are subject to the employees’ continuing service to us and do not have an expiration date. The cost of restricted stock units is determined using the fair value of eBay’s common stock on the grant date.

Certain of our executives are eligible to receive performance-based restricted stock units. The number of restricted stock units ultimately received depends on eBay’s business performance against specified performance targets set by the Compensation Committee. If the performance criteria are satisfied, the performance-based restricted stock units are granted, with one-half of the grant vesting in March following the end of the performance period and the remaining one-half vesting one year later.

Prior to the distribution, eligible employees may participate in eBay’s employee stock purchase plan. Under this plan, shares of eBay common stock may be purchased over an offering period with a maximum duration of two years at 85% of the lower of the fair market value on the first day of the applicable offering period or on the last day of the six-month purchase period. Employees may purchase shares having a value not exceeding 10% of their gross compensation during an offering period but not more than the statutory limitation of $25,000 per year. The total shares of eBay common stock purchased for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013, 2012 our employees purchased were approximately 1.5 million shares of eBay common stock at an average purchase price of $42.16, 1.7 million shares at an average price of $35.29, and 1.8 million shares at an average price of $25.88, respectively.

eBay has a savings plan, which qualifies under Section 401(k) of the Code. Participating employees may contribute up to 50% of their eligible compensation, but not more than statutory limits. In 2014, 2013 and 2012, we contributed one dollar for each dollar a participant contributed, with a maximum contribution of 4% of each

employee’s salary, subject to a maximum employer contribution of, $10,400, $10,200 and $10,000 respectively, per employee. Our non U.S. employees are covered by other savings plans. For the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012, the matching contribution expense was approximately $37 million, $35 million and $31 million, respectively.

The following table summarizes stock option activity of our employees under eBay’s equity incentive plans as of and for the year ended December 31, 2014:

The weighted average grant date fair value of options granted to our employees during the years 2014, 2013 and 2012 was $13.38, $14.90 and $11.09 respectively. The aggregate intrinsic value was calculated as the difference between the exercise price of the underlying awards and the quoted price of eBay’s common stock. During the years 2014, 2013 and 2012, the aggregate intrinsic value of options exercised under equity incentive plans was $57 million, $97 million and $109 million, respectively, determined as of the date of option exercise. At December 31, 2014, 2.4 million options were in-the-money.

Restricted Stock Units Activity and Performance Based Restricted Stock Units Activity

A summary of the status of restricted stock units granted to our employees (including performance-based restricted stock units that have been earned) under eBay’s equity incentive plans as of December 31, 2014 and changes during the year ended December 31, 2014 are presented below:

During the years 2014, 2013 and 2012, the aggregate intrinsic value of restricted stock units vested under equity incentive plans was $292 million, $303 million and $242 million, respectively.

We are charged by eBay for stock-based compensation expense related to our direct employees. eBay also charges us for the allocated costs of certain employees of eBay (including stock-based compensation) who provide general and administrative services on our behalf. Information included in this note is strictly limited to stock-based compensation associated with employees wholly dedicated to PayPal. See “Note 11—Related Party Transactions” for total costs allocated to us by eBay.

The impact on our results of operations of recording stock-based compensation expense for years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012 was as follows:

As of December 31, 2014, there was approximately $511 million of unearned stock-based compensation estimated to be expensed from 2015 through 2018. If there are any modifications or cancellations of the underlying unvested awards, we may be required to accelerate, increase or cancel all or a portion of the remaining unearned stock-based compensation expense. Future unearned stock-based compensation will increase to the extent we grant additional equity awards, change the mix of grants between stock options and restricted stock units or assume unvested equity awards in connection with acquisitions. Total stock-based compensation costs included in capitalized software costs was $10 million, $10 million, and $12 million, respectively, for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013, and 2012.

We calculated the fair value of each option award on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. The following weighted average assumptions were used for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012:

Our computation of expected volatility was based on a combination of historical and market-based implied volatility from traded options on eBay’s stock. The computation of expected life was determined based on historical experience of similar awards, giving consideration to the contractual terms of the stock-based awards, vesting schedules, and expectations of future employee behavior. The interest rate for periods within the contractual life of the award is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant.

We are a member of the eBay consolidated group and our U.S. taxable income is included in the consolidated U.S. federal income tax return of eBay as well as in returns filed by eBay with certain state and local taxing jurisdictions. Our foreign income tax returns are filed on a separate company basis. Our income tax liability has been computed and presented herein under the “separate return method,” as if we were a separate tax paying entity, as modified by the benefits-for-loss approach. Accordingly, the operating losses and other tax attributes are characterized as utilized when those attributes have been utilized by other members of the eBay consolidated group; however, the benefits-for-loss approach does not impact our tax expense. Federal and state income taxes incurred are remitted to eBay pursuant to a tax sharing agreement between the companies.

The difference between the actual provision for income taxes and the provision computed by applying the federal statutory rate of 35% to income before income taxes is primarily the result of foreign income taxed at different rates and the accrual of U.S. income tax on undistributed foreign profits previously reinvested indefinitely. The following is a reconciliation of the difference between the actual provision for income taxes and the provision computed by applying the federal statutory rate.

Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences of differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which the differences are expected to reverse. Significant deferred tax assets and liabilities consist of the following (in millions):

As of December 31, 2014 and 2013, current deferred tax assets of $2 million and $24 million, respectively, are included as a component of other current assets in our combined balance sheet. As of December 31, 2014 and 2013, long-term deferred tax assets of $10 million and $7 million, respectively, are included as a component of other assets.

As of December 31, 2014, a current deferred tax liability of $708 million is included as a component of accrued expenses and other current liabilities. As of December 31, 2014 and 2013, long-term deferred tax liabilities of $145 million and $184 million, respectively, are included as a component of long-term liabilities on our combined balance sheet. The current and long-term deferred tax assets and current and long-term deferred tax liabilities were not netted since these items relate to different tax jurisdictions.

As of December 31, 2014, our federal, state and foreign net operating loss carryforwards for income tax purposes were approximately $18 million, $251 million, and $33 million, respectively. The federal and state net operating loss carryforwards are subject to various limitations under Section 382 of the Code. If not utilized, the federal net operating loss carryforwards will begin to expire in 2018, and the state net operating loss carryforwards will begin to expire in 2015. As of December 31, 2014, our federal and state tax credit carryforwards for income tax purposes were approximately $1 million and $26 million, respectively. If not utilized, the federal tax credit carryforwards will begin to expire in 2027, and most of the state tax credits carry forward indefinitely.

At December 31, 2014 and 2013, we maintained a valuation allowance with respect to certain of our deferred tax assets relating primarily to operating losses in certain states that we believe are not likely to be realized.

As of December 31, 2013, we had approximately $3.4 billion of indefinitely reinvested foreign earnings for which we had not provided U.S. income or applicable foreign withholding taxes. During the first quarter of 2014, we altered our capital allocation strategy, which included changing our intent with regard to the indefinite reinvestment of foreign earnings from certain of our foreign subsidiaries for 2013 and prior years. Accordingly, during the first quarter we determined that a portion of these foreign earnings are no longer considered indefinitely reinvested in our international operations. In connection with this change in our capital allocation strategy during the first quarter of 2014, we provided for U.S. income and applicable foreign withholding taxes on $1.9 billion of undistributed foreign earnings of certain of our foreign subsidiaries for 2013 and prior years, and recorded a deferred tax liability of approximately $650 million. The remaining undistributed foreign earnings of approximately $1.5 billion for 2013 and prior years remains indefinitely reinvested in our international operations.

This change reflected our objective of increasing our available U.S. cash, preserving our credit rating and, providing greater liquidity to meet our other cash needs in the U.S., which may include, among other things and subject to market conditions and other uncertainties, merger and acquisition activity.

We have not provided for U.S. federal income and foreign withholding taxes on $2.3 billion of our non-U.S. subsidiaries’ undistributed earnings as of December 31, 2014, because such earnings are intended to be indefinitely reinvested in our international operations. We do not know the time or manner in which we would repatriate those funds. Because the time or manner of repatriation is uncertain, we cannot determine the impact of local taxes, withholding taxes and foreign tax credits associated with the future repatriation of such earnings and therefore cannot quantify the tax liability. In cases where we intend not to indefinitely reinvest a portion of our foreign subsidiaries’ undistributed earnings, we provide U.S. taxes on such earnings and such taxes are included in deferred taxes or tax payable liabilities depending upon the planned timing and manner of such repatriation.

We benefit from tax rulings concluded in several different jurisdictions, most significantly Singapore and Luxembourg. These rulings provide for significantly lower rates of taxation on certain classes of income and require various thresholds of investment and employment in those jurisdictions. We evaluate compliance with our tax ruling agreements annually. These rulings resulted in tax savings of approximately $217 million, $211 million and $139 million in 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively. These tax rulings are in effect currently and expire over periods ranging from 2020 to 2021.

The following table reflects changes in unrecognized tax benefits since January 1, 2012:

During 2014, we increased our reserves by $38 million for various issues that related to tax examination risks assessed during the year. In addition, we reduced our reserves by $7 million based on audit findings and settlement of multiple uncertain tax positions. If the remaining balance of unrecognized tax benefits were realized in a future period, it would result in a tax benefit of $138 million.

During all years presented, we recognized interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions in income tax expense. In 2014, we recognized interest and penalties of $10 million in income tax expense. The amount of interest and penalties accrued as of December 31, 2014 and 2013 was approximately $36 million and $27 million, respectively.

We are subject to taxation in the U.S. and various states and foreign jurisdictions. We are under examination by certain tax authorities for the 2003 to 2012 tax years. The material jurisdictions in which we are subject to examination by tax authorities for tax years after 2002 primarily include the U.S. (Federal and California), UK, Canada, France, India, Singapore and Israel. We believe that adequate amounts have been reserved for any adjustments that may ultimately result from these examinations.

Although the timing of the resolution of these audits is uncertain, we do not expect the total amount of the unrecognized tax benefits as of December 31, 2014 will materially change in the next 12 months. However, given the number of years remaining subject to examination and the number of matters being examined, we are unable to estimate the full range of possible adjustments to the balance of gross unrecognized tax benefits.

In the fourth quarter of 2012, we implemented a global restructuring plan to simplify and streamline our organization and strengthen the overall competitiveness of our existing businesses. The plan included a strategic reduction of our existing global workforce by approximately 300 employees and 300 contractors. In connection with the plan, we incurred aggregate charges of approximately $19 million as of December 31, 2012, primarily related to severance and benefits. The associated liability was $9 million as of December 31, 2012 due to payments of and other adjustments (including foreign currency translation) in accrued expenses and other current liabilities on our combined balance sheet. As of December 31, 2013, no liability remained and all restructuring actions under the plan were substantially complete. In 2014 and 2013, restructuring charges were not material and are recorded in general and administrative expenses on the combined statement of income.

The following table summarizes the changes in accumulated balances of other comprehensive income for the year ended December 31, 2014:

The following table summarizes the changes in accumulated balances of other comprehensive income for the year ended December 31, 2013:

The following table provides details about reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income for the year ended December 31, 2014:

In January 2015, at a regular meeting of eBay’s Board of Directors (“eBay’s Board”), eBay’s Board approved a plan to implement a strategic reduction of its existing global workforce. As a result, we expect to reduce our workforce globally by approximately 1,000 positions worldwide. The reduction is expected to be substantially completed in the first half of 2015. We expect to incur pre-tax restructuring charges of approximately $43 million primarily for employee-related costs.

The Financial Statement Schedule II—VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS is filed as part of this information statement.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed combined financial statements.

We are a leading technology platform company that enables digital and mobile payments on behalf of consumers and merchants worldwide. We put our customers at the center of everything we do. We strive to become the most convenient and trusted way for consumers, merchants, friends and family to move and manage money anywhere in the world, anytime and through any device (e.g. mobile, tablets, personal computers or wearables). We provide safer and simpler ways for businesses of all sizes to accept payments from merchant websites, mobile devices and applications, and at offline retail locations through a wide range of payment solutions across our Payments Platform, including PayPal, PayPal Credit, Venmo and Braintree products.

The accompanying condensed combined financial statements have been prepared on a stand-alone basis and are derived from eBay’s consolidated financial statements and records. The condensed combined financial statements reflect PayPal’s financial position, results of operations, and cash flows as its business was operated as part of eBay prior to the distribution, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (U.S. GAAP).

These condensed combined financial statements include expenses associated with workplace resources and information technology that were previously allocated to the Payments segment of eBay, and, additional expenses related to certain corporate functions, including senior management, legal, human resources and finance. These expenses also include allocations related to share based compensation. The expenses that have been incurred by eBay are allocated to us based on direct usage or benefit where identifiable, with the remainder allocated on a pro rata basis of revenue, headcount, or other systematic measure. We consider the expense allocation methodology and results to be reasonable for all periods presented. The condensed combined financial statements also include certain assets and liabilities that have historically been held at the eBay corporate level, but which are specifically identifiable and attributable to us. The condensed combined financial position, results of operations and cash flows of PayPal may not be indicative of our results had we been a separate stand-alone entity during the periods presented, nor are the results stated herein indicative of what the Company’s financial position, results of operations and cash flows may be in the future. All intra-company transactions and accounts have been eliminated.

The accompanying condensed financial statements are combined and include the financial statements of PayPal and our wholly and majority-owned subsidiaries. Investments in entities where we hold at least a 20% ownership interest and have the ability to exercise significant influence, but not control, over the investee are accounted for using the equity method of accounting. For such investments, our share of the investees’ results of operations is

included in other income (expense), net and our investment balance is included in long-term investments. Investments in entities where we hold less than a 20% ownership interest are generally accounted for using the cost method of accounting, and our share of the investees’ results of operations is included in other income (expense), net in our condensed combined statement of income to the extent dividends are received.

These condensed combined financial statements and accompanying notes should be read in conjunction with the audited combined financial statements and accompanying notes for the year ended December 31, 2014.

We have evaluated all subsequent events through June 1, 2015, the date the financial statements were available to be issued.

The preparation of combined condensed financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the combined financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses, including allocations from eBay, during the reporting period. On an ongoing basis, we evaluate our estimates, including those related to provisions for transaction losses, legal contingencies, income taxes, revenue recognition, stock-based compensation, goodwill and the recoverability of intangible assets. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions which we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

In 2014, the FASB issued new guidance related to pushdown accounting. The new guidance provides an acquired entity with an option to apply pushdown accounting in its separate financial statements upon occurrence of an event in which an acquirer obtains control of the acquired entity. The amendments became effective on November 18, 2014. We adopted this guidance, as required, on November 18, 2014. The adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on our financial statements.

In 2015, the FASB issued new guidance related to extraordinary and unusual items. The new standard eliminates the concept of extraordinary items from GAAP. The new standard is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2015. Early adoption is permitted. The company may apply the standard prospectively or retrospectively to all periods presented. The adoption of this standard is not expected to have a material impact on our financial statements.

In 2015, the FASB issued new guidance related to consolidations. The new guidance amends the guidelines for determining whether certain legal entities should be consolidated and reduces the number of consolidation models. The new guidance is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2015. Early adoption is permitted. We are evaluating the impact, if any, of adopting this new accounting guidance on our financial statements.

In 2015, the FASB issued new guidance related to debt issuance costs. The new guidance requires debt issuance costs related to a recognized debt liability to be presented in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the debt liability rather than as an asset. The new standard is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2015. Early adoption is permitted. We are evaluating the impact, if any, of adopting this new accounting guidance on our financial statements.

In 2015, the FASB issued new guidance related to accounting for fees paid in a cloud computing arrangement. The new standard provides guidance to customers about whether a cloud computing arrangement includes a software license. If a cloud computing arrangement includes a software license, then the customer should account for the software license element of the arrangement consistent with the acquisition of other software licenses. If a cloud computing arrangement does not include a software license, the customer should account for the arrangement as a service contract. The new standard is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2015. Early adoption is permitted. We are evaluating the impact, if any, of adopting this new accounting guidance on our financial statements.

The following table presents goodwill balances and adjustments to those balances during the three months ended March 31, 2015:

All identifiable intangible assets are subject to amortization and no significant residual value is estimated for the intangible assets. Amortization expense for intangible assets was $19 million and $24 million for the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively.

Expected future intangible asset amortization as of March 31, 2015 is as follows (in millions):

The following tables summarize the allocation of net revenues based on geography:

Net revenues are attributed to U.S. and international geographies primarily based upon the country in which the merchant is located, or in the case of a cross border transaction, may be earned from both countries in which the consumer and merchant reside. Net revenues earned from other value added services are typically attributed to the country in which either the consumer or the merchant reside. Long-lived assets attributed to the U.S. and international geographies are based upon the country in which the asset is located or owned.

Information regarding net revenues by major products and services for March 31, 2015 and 2014 is as follows:

At March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, the estimated fair value of our short-term and long-term investments classified as available for sale are as follows:

We had no material short-term investments that have been in a continuous unrealized loss position for greater than 12 months as of March 31, 2015. Amounts reclassified to earnings from unrealized gains and losses were not material for the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014.

We have made multiple equity and cost method investments which are reported in long-term investments on our combined balance sheet. As of March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, our equity and cost method investments totaled $31 million.

The following table summarizes our financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014:

Our financial assets and liabilities are valued using market prices on both active markets (Level 1) and less active markets (Level 2). Level 1 instrument valuations are obtained from real-time quotes for transactions in active exchange markets involving identical assets. Level 2 instrument valuations are obtained from readily available pricing sources for comparable instruments, identical instruments in less active markets, or models using market observable inputs. The majority of our derivative instruments are valued using pricing models that take into account the contract terms as well as multiple inputs where applicable, such as equity prices, interest rate yield curves, option volatility and currency rates. Our derivative instruments are primarily short-term in nature, generally one month to one year in duration. Certain foreign currency contracts designated as cash flow hedges may have a duration of up to 18 months. We did not have any transfers of financial instruments between

valuation levels during the first three months of 2015. As of March 31, 2015 we did not have any assets or liabilities requiring measurement at fair value without observable market values that would require a high level of judgment to determine fair value (Level 3).

For our derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges, the amounts recognized in earnings related to the ineffective portion were not material in each of the periods presented, and we did not exclude any component of the changes in fair value of the derivative instruments from the assessment of hedge effectiveness. As of March 31, 2015, we estimated that $182 million of net derivative gains related to our cash flow hedges included in accumulated other comprehensive income will be reclassified into earnings within the next 12 months.

The fair value of our outstanding derivative instruments as of March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014 was as follows:

Under the master netting agreements with the respective counterparties to our foreign exchange contracts, subject to applicable requirements, we are allowed to net settle transactions of the same type with a single net amount payable by one party to the other. However, we have elected to present the derivative assets and derivative liabilities on a gross basis in our balance sheet. As of March 31, 2015, the potential effect of rights of set-off associated with the above foreign exchange contracts would be an offset to both assets and liabilities by $8 million, resulting in net derivative assets of $191 million and net derivative liabilities of less than $1 million. We are not required to pledge, nor are we entitled to receive cash collateral related to these derivative transactions.

The following tables summarize the activity of derivative contracts that qualify for hedge accounting as of March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, and the impact of designated derivative instruments on accumulated other comprehensive income for the three months ended March 31, 2015:

The following tables summarize the activity of derivative contracts that qualify for hedge accounting as of March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, and the impact of designated derivative instruments on accumulated other comprehensive income for the three months ended March 31, 2014:

The following table provides the location in the financial statements of the recognized gains or losses related to our derivative instruments:

Derivative transactions are measured in terms of the notional amount, but this amount is not recorded on the balance sheet and is not, when viewed in isolation, a meaningful measure of the risk profile of the derivative instruments. The notional amount is generally not exchanged, but is used only as the basis on which the value of foreign exchange payments under these contracts is determined. The following table provides the notional amounts of our outstanding derivatives:

For the three months end March 31, 2015 and March 31, 2014, we purchased approximately $1.4 billion and $1.1 billion, respectively, in consumer receivables. As of March 31, 2015, the total outstanding balance of this pool of consumer receivables was $3.6 billion of which we sold a participation interest to the new chartered financial institution of $169 million or 5%. The chartered financial institution has no recourse related to its participation interest for failure of debtors to pay when due. The participation interest held by the charted financial institution has the same priority to the interests held by us and is subject to the same credit, prepayment, and interest rate risk associated with this pool of consumer receivables. In April 2015, we concluded an arrangement with certain investors under which we have agreed to sell a participation interest in a portion of these consumer receivables. These investors have no recourse against us related to their participation interests for failure of debtors to pay when due. The participation interest held by these investors have the same priority to the interests held by us and are subject to the same credit, prepayment, and interest rate risk associated with the consumer receivables. As of March 31, 2015, we classified approximately $700 million of the consumer receivables related to the participation interest we agreed to sell to investors as held for sale. The consumer receivables held for sale are recorded at the lower of cost or fair value on an aggregate portfolio basis. No adjustment to the carrying value was recorded as a result of classifying these consumer receivables as held for sale.

Loans and interest receivable are reported at their outstanding principal balances, net of participation interest sold and pro-rata allowances, including unamortized deferred origination costs and estimated collectible interest and fees. We use a consumer’s FICO score, among other measures, in evaluating the credit quality of our consumer receivables. A FICO score is a type of credit score that lenders use to assess an applicant’s credit risk and whether to extend credit. Individual FICO scores generally are obtained each quarter the consumer has an outstanding consumer receivable owned by PayPal Credit. The weighted average consumer FICO score related to our loans and interest receivable balance outstanding at March 31, 2015 was 684 compared to 687 at December 31, 2014.

As of March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, approximately 52.4% and 54.2%, respectively, of the pool of consumer receivables and interest receivable balance was due from consumers with FICO scores greater than 680, which is generally considered “prime” by the consumer credit industry. As of March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, approximately 11.0% and 9.3%, respectively, of the pool of consumer receivables and interest receivable balance was due from customers with FICO scores below 599. As of March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, approximately 90.9% and 89.8%, respectively, of the portfolio of consumer receivables and interest receivable was current.

The following table presents the principal amount of loans and interest receivable segmented by a FICO score range:

The following tables presents the delinquency status of the principal amount of loans and interest receivable:

The following table summarizes the activity in the allowance for loans and interest receivable:

During 2013, we launched a program working with a chartered financial institution to offer working capital advances to select merchant sellers in the U.S. We subsequently purchase the related merchant receivable from the chartered financial institution. Under the program, participating merchants can borrow a certain percentage of their annual payment volume processed by PayPal and are charged a fixed fee for the loan. In 2014, we have extended this program to a limited number of international markets whereby we grant working capital advances to merchants directly through our Luxembourg bank subsidiary or through other PayPal affiliates. The total net receivable outstanding as of March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014 was approximately $125 million and $99 million, respectively.

As of March 31, 2015, approximately $21.5 billion of unused credit was available to PayPal Credit accountholders. While this amount represents the total unused credit available, we have not experienced, and do not anticipate, that all of our PayPal Credit accountholders will access their entire available credit at any given point in time. In addition, the individual lines of credit that make up this unused credit are subject to periodic review and termination by the chartered financial institutions that are the issuer of PayPal Credit products based on, among other things, account usage and customer creditworthiness. When a consumer funds a purchase in the U.S. using a PayPal Credit product issued by a chartered financial institution, the chartered financial institution extends credit to the consumer, funds the extension of credit at the point of sale and remits funds to the merchant. We subsequently purchase the receivables related to the consumer loans extended by the chartered financial

institution and, as a result of the purchase, bear the risk of loss in the event of loan defaults. Although the chartered financial institution continues to own each customer account, we own the related receivable and are responsible for all servicing functions related to the account.

In June 2014, we agreed, subject to certain conditions, that we, one of our affiliates or a third party partner will purchase a portfolio of consumer loan receivables relating to the customer accounts arising out of our current credit program agreement with Synchrony (formerly GE Capital Retail Bank) for a price based on the book value of the consumer loan receivables portfolio at the time of the purchase (expected to be the fourth quarter of 2016), subject to certain adjustments and exclusions. As of March 31, 2015, Synchrony had a net receivables portfolio under the credit program agreement of approximately $1.5 billion.

We are involved in legal and regulatory proceedings on an ongoing basis. Many of these proceedings are in early stages, and may seek an indeterminate amount of damages. If we believe that a loss arising from such matters is probable and can be reasonably estimated, we accrue the estimated liability in our financial statements. If only a range of estimated losses can be determined, we accrue an amount within the range that, in our judgment, reflects the most likely outcome; if none of the estimates within that range is a better estimate than any other amount, we accrue the low end of the range. For those proceedings in which an unfavorable outcome is reasonably possible but not probable, we have disclosed an estimate of the reasonably possible loss or range of losses or we have concluded that an estimate of the reasonably possible loss or range arising directly from the proceeding (i.e., monetary damages or amounts paid in judgment or settlement) are not material. If we cannot estimate the probable or reasonably possible loss or range of losses arising from a legal proceeding, we have disclosed that fact. In assessing the materiality of a legal proceeding, we evaluate, among other factors, the amount of monetary damages claimed, as well as the potential impact of non-monetary remedies sought by plaintiffs (e.g., injunctive relief) that may require us to change our business practices in a manner that could have a material adverse impact on our business. With respect to the matters disclosed in this Note 8, we are unable to estimate the possible loss or range of losses that could potentially result from the application of such non-monetary remedies.

Amounts accrued for legal and regulatory proceedings for which we believe a loss is probable were not material for the three months ended March 31, 2015. Except as otherwise noted for the proceedings described in this Note 8, we have concluded, based on currently available information, that reasonably possible losses arising directly from the proceedings (i.e., monetary damages or amounts paid in judgment or settlement) in excess of our recorded accruals are also not material. However, legal and regulatory proceedings are inherently unpredictable and subject to significant uncertainties. If one or more matters were resolved against us in a reporting period for amounts in excess of management’s expectations, the impact on our operating results or financial condition for that reporting period could be material.

We routinely report to the U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) on payments we have rejected or blocked pursuant to OFAC sanctions regulations and on any possible violations of those regulations. We have cooperated with OFAC in recent years regarding our review process over transaction monitoring and have self-reported a large number of small dollar amount transactions that could possibly be in violation of OFAC sanctions regulations. In March 2015, we reached a settlement with OFAC regarding the possible violations arising from our practices between 2009 and 2013, before our implementation of real-time monitoring processes. The settlement did not have a material impact on our financial statements. In addition, we

continue to cooperate with OFAC regarding more recent self-reported transactions that could also possibly be in violation of OFAC sanctions regulations. Such self-reported transactions could result in claims or actions against us including litigation, injunctions, damage awards or require us to change our business practices that could result in a material loss, require significant management time, result in the diversion of significant operational resources or otherwise harm our business.

On August 7, 2013 and January 13, 2014, eBay, PayPal and certain wholly owned subsidiaries of PayPal received Civil Investigative Demands (CIDs) from the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) requesting that we provide testimony, produce documents and provide information relating primarily to the acquisition, management, and operation of our PayPal Credit products, including online credit products and services, advertising, loan origination, customer acquisition, servicing, debt collection, and complaints handling practices. The CIDs could lead to an enforcement action and/or one or more significant consent orders, which may result in substantial costs, including legal fees, fines, penalties and remediation expenses. We are cooperating with the CFPB in connection with the CIDs and are engaging in settlement discussions. The CFPB provided us with a Notice and Opportunity to Respond and Advise and indicated that a lawsuit could be filed against us as early as the second quarter of 2015. Resolution of these inquiries could require us to make monetary payments to certain customers, pay fines and/or change the manner in which we operate the PayPal Credit products, which could adversely affect our business.

In the ordinary course of business, we include limited indemnification provisions in certain of our agreements with parties with whom we have commercial relations, including our standard marketing, promotions, and application-programming-interface license agreements. Under these contracts, we generally indemnify, hold harmless, and agree to reimburse the indemnified party for losses suffered or incurred by the indemnified party in connection with claims by any third party with respect to our domain names, trademarks, logos, and other branding elements to the extent that such marks are applicable to our performance under the subject agreement. In a limited number of agreements, we have provided an indemnity for other types of third-party claims, which are indemnities mainly related to intellectual property rights. We have also provided an indemnity to our payments processors in the event of certain third-party claims or card association fines against the processor arising out of conduct by us or our customers. It is not possible to determine the maximum potential loss under these indemnification provisions due to our limited history of prior indemnification claims and the unique facts and circumstances involved in each particular provision. To date, no significant costs have been incurred, either individually or collectively, in connection with our indemnification provisions.

As of March 31, 2015, we had no off-balance sheet arrangements that have, or are reasonably likely to have, a current or future material effect on our combined financial condition, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources.

The maximum potential exposure under our protection programs is estimated to be the portion of total eligible transaction volume (TPV) for which buyer or seller protection claims may be raised under our existing user agreements. Since eligible transactions are typically completed in a period significantly shorter than the period under which disputes may be opened, and based on our historical losses to date, we do not believe that that the maximum potential exposure is representative of our actual potential exposure. The actual amount of exposure cannot be quantified as we are unable to determine total eligible transactions where performance by a merchant or customer is incomplete or completed transactions that may result in a claim under our protection programs. We record a liability with respect to losses under these protection programs when they are probable and the amount can be reasonably estimated.

The following table provides management’s estimate of the maximum potential exposure related to our protection programs as of March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014:

In August 2009, we entered into a Cash Sharing Agreement with eBay in which our excess U.S. funds are swept to eBay on a daily basis. The main purpose of the Cash Sharing Agreement is to implement a centralized cash management structure to effectively manage U.S. Dollar cash, to leverage administrative efficiencies, and to centralize the investment/borrowing of cash and settlement of payables and receivables at the eBay level. Since the Cash Sharing Agreement is two-way, we can receive funds back from eBay as needed. The rate earned on funds lent to eBay is the average daily LIBOR USD 1-month rate plus 20 basis points. The balance due from eBay and reported in notes and receivable from affiliates in our condensed combined balance sheet was $612 million and $559 million at March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively. Interest income earned on the arrangement was reported in other income (expense), net but was not material for the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014.

In November 2008, we entered into an intercompany loan agreement with eBay in which the acquisition of receivables related to PayPal Credit accounts are funded through eBay’s existing financing arrangements at an interest rate of 1.2% for the three months ended March 31, 2015. At March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, the loan balance included in notes and payable to affiliates in our condensed combined balance sheet was $754 million and $809 million, respectively. The interest expense incurred during the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014 was $4 million and $2 million, respectively.

In September 2014, we entered into an intercompany loan agreement with eBay whereby we borrowed 130 million Brazilian Real for one year at an interest rate of 11% plus spread 0.5% per annum during the term of the loan. The loan is used to fund our installment payments product in Brazil. The loan was repaid in March 2015. The interest expense incurred on the arrangement was reported in other income (expense), net but was not material for the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014.

In September 2014, we entered into an intercompany loan agreement with eBay whereby we borrowed $10 million from eBay for six months at an interest rate of 1.2% per annum. The loan was repaid in March 2015. Interest income earned on the arrangement was reported in other income (expense), net but was not material for the three months ended March 31, 2015.

In October 2014, we entered into an intercompany loan agreement with eBay whereby we loaned eBay 580 million Indian Rupee for six months at an interest rate of 9.4% per annum. The balance due from eBay and reported in notes and receivable from affiliates in our condensed combined balance sheet was $9 million at March 31, 2015. Interest income earned on the arrangement was reported in other income (expense), net but was not material for the three months ended March 31, 2015.

In December 2014, we entered into an intercompany loan agreement with eBay whereby we loaned eBay 500 million Indian Rupee for six months at an interest rate of 9.0% per annum. The balance due from eBay and reported in notes and receivable from affiliates in our condensed combined balance sheet was $8 million at March 31, 2015. Interest income earned on the arrangement was reported in other income (expense) but was not material for the three months ended March 31, 2015.

All other contracts with related parties are at rates and terms that we believe are comparable with those that could be entered into with independent third parties. There were no other material related party transactions in the periods presented. As of March 31, 2015, there were no other material amounts payable to or amounts receivable from related parties. Post separation, we will no longer participate in cash management and intercompany funding arrangements with eBay.

Net revenues include $28 million earned from eBay and its subsidiaries for the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014.

We recover costs from eBay relating to customer protection programs offered on qualifying eBay purchases made with PayPal. These costs include the actual transaction losses associated with customer filed claims as well as an allocation of salary related expenses for customer support teams working on customer claims and disputes related to on eBay purchases. Recoveries associated with transaction losses incurred on eligible eBay purchases during the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014, were $10 million and $12 million, respectively, which were recorded as a reduction to transaction and loan loss. Other costs recovered from eBay related to the customer protection program for the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014, were $5 million in each period, and are included as a reduction to customer support and operations and general and administrative expenses in our combined statement of income.

We incur user acquisition fees from eBay on payment volume which we process from purchases made on eBay’s platform. User acquisition fees for the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014 were $30 million in each period and are included within sales and marketing expenses.

These combined financial statements include expenses associated with workplace resources and information technology that were previously allocated to the Payments segment of eBay, and, additional expenses related to certain corporate functions, including senior management, legal, human resources and finance. These expenses also include allocations related to share based compensation. The expenses that have been allocated to us by eBay are based on direct usage or benefit where identifiable, with the remainder allocated on a pro rata basis of revenue, headcount, or other systematic measure. We consider the expense allocation methodology and results to be reasonable for all periods presented. The corporate costs and allocation of expenses to us from eBay included within customer support and operations, sales and marketing, product development, and general and administrative expenses were $160 million and $136 million for the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively, of which $61 million and $60 million were included in general and administrative expenses.

The following table summarizes stock option activity of our employees under eBay’s equity incentive plans for the three months ended March 31, 2015:

The weighted average exercise price of stock options granted during the period was $56.47 per share.

Restricted Stock Units Activity and Performance Based Restricted Stock Units Activity

A summary of the status of restricted stock units granted (including performance-based restricted stock units that have been earned) under eBay’s equity incentive plans for the three months ended March 31, 2015:

We are charged by eBay for stock-based compensation expense related to our direct employees. eBay also charges us for the allocated costs of certain employees of eBay (including stock-based compensation) who provide general and administrative services on our behalf. Information included in this note is strictly limited to stock-based compensation associated with the employees wholly dedicated to PayPal (see “Note 9—Related Party Transactions” for total costs allocated to us by eBay).

The impact on our results of operations of recording stock-based compensation expense for the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014 was as follows:

Total stock-based compensation costs capitalized as part of internal use software and website development costs was $2 million and $1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively.

We are a member of the eBay consolidated group and our U.S. taxable income is included in the consolidated U.S. federal income tax return of eBay as well as in returns filed by eBay with certain state and local taxing jurisdictions. Our foreign income tax returns are filed on a separate company basis. Our income tax liability has been computed and presented herein under the “separate return method” as if it were a separate tax paying entity, as modified by the benefits-for-loss approach. Accordingly, our operating losses and other tax attributes are characterized as utilized when those attributes have been utilized by other members of the eBay consolidated group; however, the benefits-for-loss approach does not impact our tax expense. Federal and state income taxes incurred are remitted to eBay pursuant to a tax sharing agreement between the companies.

Our effective tax rate for the three months ended March 31, 2015 was 20.6%. The difference between our effective tax rate and the U.S. federal statutory rate of 35% was primarily the result of foreign income taxed at different rates, partially offset by discrete tax adjustments.

In January 2015, at a regular meeting of the eBay board of directors, the eBay’s board of directors approved a plan to implement a strategic reduction of its existing global workforce. The reduction is expected to be substantially completed in the first half of 2015.

The following table summarizes the restructuring reserve activity during the three months ended March 31, 2015:

The following table summarizes the changes in accumulated balances of other comprehensive income for the three months ended March 31, 2015:

The following table summarizes the changes in accumulated balances of other comprehensive income for the three months ended March 31, 2014:

The following table provides details about reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income for the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014:

In April 2015, we concluded an agreement with certain investors under which we have agreed to sell a participation interest of approximately $700 million in a portion of our purchased consumer receivables arising from loans made by our partner chartered financial institution to individual consumers to purchase goods and services using PayPal Credit products; this transaction was completed in May 2015. The carrying value of such consumer receivables upon the closing and funding of this participation interest was $708 million and differed from the carrying value at March 31, 2015 due to normal, ongoing payment and resolution activity.

In April 2015, we completed our acquisition of Paydiant, Inc. for approximately $285 million in cash. The acquisition of Paydiant is intended to expand our capabilities in mobile payments. Using Paydiant’s platform, our merchant partners can create their own branded wallets to accelerate mobile-in-store payments and drive consumer engagement through mobile payments, loyalty, offers and the prioritization of preferred payment types, such as store branded credit cards and gift cards. We are in the process of determining the purchase price allocation for this acquisition.

In April 2015, we completed our acquisition of CyActive Security, Ltd. CyActive is a cybersecurity firm that specializes in technology that predicts how malware will develop. The acquisition of CyActive is intended to further enhance our risk assessment capabilities used to protect merchants and consumers on our Payments Platform. We are in the process of determining the purchase price allocation for this acquisition.


	As of March 31, 2015
	Historical		Pro Forma
	(In millions)
	(Unaudited)
Cash and equivalents⁽¹⁾	$	2,365	$	6,165


Indebtedness:
Short-term debt
Notes and payable to affiliates⁽³⁾		868		116

Total Indebtedness	$	868	$	116


Stockholders’ equity:
Common stock, par value $0.0001 per share on a pro forma basis⁽²⁾		—		—
Additional paid-in capital⁽¹⁾		—		12,387
Net parent investment^{(1), (2)}		8,498		—
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)		142		142

Total stockholders’ equity	$	8,640	$	12,529

Total Capitalization	$	9,508	$	12,645


	As Reported		Pro Forma Adjustments			Pro Forma
	(In millions, except per share amounts)
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	2,365	$	3,800	(g)	$	6,165
Short-term investments		10		—			10
Accounts receivable, net		53		—			53
Loans and interest receivable, net		3,566		—			3,566
Funds receivable and customer accounts		10,945		—			10,945
Notes and receivable from affiliates		788		(626	)(h)		162
Other current assets		480		—			480

Total current assets		18,207		3,174			21,381

Long-term investments		31		—			31
Property and equipment, net		989		165	(i)(j)		1,154
Goodwill		3,184		—			3,184
Intangible assets, net		138		14	(k)		152
Other assets		30		12	(l)		42

Total assets	$	22,579	$	3,365		$	25,944

LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable	$	125	$	—		$	125
Funds payable and amounts due to customers		10,945		—			10,945
Notes and payable to affiliates		868		(752	)(h)		116
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities		1,565		—			1,565
Income taxes payable		46		—			46

Total current liabilities		13,549		(752	)		12,797
Long-term liabilities		390		228	(g)(j)(k)		618

Total liabilities		13,939		(524	)		13,415

Commitments and contingencies (Note 8)
Equity:
Common stock, $0.0001 par value		—		—	(m)		—
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)		142		—			142
Net parent investment		8,498		(8,498	)(m)		—
Additional paid-in capital		—		12,387	(m)		12,387

Total equity		8,640		3,889			12,529

Total liabilities and equity	$	22,579	$	3,365		$	25,944


$ in millions	March 31, 2015		December 31, 2014
Protection program losses, historically reported as a reduction of transaction and loan losses		10		43
Protection program services, historically reported as a reduction of customer support and operations		4		16
Protection program services, historically reported as a reduction in general and administrative expenses		1		6


	Three Months Ended March 31,						Percent Increase/ (Decrease)
	2015			2014			Percent Increase/ (Decrease)
	(In millions, except percentages)
Net Revenues	$	2,137		$	1,874			14	%
Operating Expenses		1,815			1,556			17	%

Operating Income		322			318			1	%
Income Tax Expense		66			694			(90	)%
Effective Income Tax Rate		21	%		222	%		*	*
Net Income/(Loss)	$	255		$	(382	)		(167	)%


	Three Months Ended March 31,						Percent Increase/ (Decrease)
	2015			2014			Percent Increase/ (Decrease)
	*(In millions, except percentages)*
Active customer accounts		165			148			11	%
Number of payment transactions		1,123			918			22	%
Total TPV	$	63,021		$	53,676			17	%
Percent of cross-border TPV		23	%		24	%			**
Percent of TPV from large merchants		42	%		40	%			**


	Page
Questions and Answers About the Separation and Distribution		1

Information Statement Summary		8

Risk Factors		16

Cautionary Statement Concerning Forward-Looking Statements		44

The Separation and Distribution		45

Dividend Policy		51

Capitalization		52

Selected Historical Combined Financial Data of PayPal		53

Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined Financial Statements		54

Business		60

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations		72

Management		98

Directors		100

Compensation Discussion and Analysis		109

Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control		145

Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions		157

Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences		170

Description of Material Indebtedness		174

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management		175

Description of PayPal’s Capital Stock		177

Where You Can Find More Information		182

Index to Financial Statements		F-1


	3 Months Ended March 31,							Year Ended December 31,
	Pro Forma 2015		2015		2014			Pro Forma 2014		2014		2013		2012		2011		2010
	(Unaudited in millions)									(In millions)
Combined Statement of Income Data:
Net revenue	$	2,134	$	2,137	$	1,874		$	8,012	$	8,025	$	6,727	$	5,662	$	4,499	$	3,508
Operating income		314		322		318			1,237		1,268		1,091		880		556		390
Net income		248		255		(382	)		391		419		955		778		460		350
Earnings Per Share
Basic	$	0.20		N/A		N/A		$	0.31		N/A		N/A		N/A		N/A		N/A
Diluted	$	0.20		N/A		N/A		$	0.31		N/A		N/A		N/A		N/A		N/A

Combined Balance Sheet Data:
Total assets	$	25,944	$	22,579	$	19,833				$	21,917	$	19,160	$	16,183	$	11,140	$	8,300
Total long term liabilities		618		390		461					386		509		428		306		188


	As Reported			Pro Forma Adjustments			Pro Forma
	(In millions, except per share amounts)
Net revenues	$	2,137		$	(3	)(a)	$	2,134
Operating expenses:
Transaction expense		575			—			575
Transaction and loan losses		178			10	(b)		188
Customer support and operations		275			3	(b) (c) (j)		278
Sales and marketing		236			(13	)(d)		223
Product development		224			—			224
General and administrative		138			1	(b)		139
Depreciation and amortization		141			4	(j)		145
Restructuring		48			—			48

Total operating expenses		1,815			5			1,820

Operating income		322			(8	)		314
Other income (expense), net		(1	)		—			(1	)

Income before income taxes		321			(8	)		313

Income tax expense (benefit)		66			(1	)(e)		65

Net income attributable to PayPal	$	255		$	(7	)	$	248


Net Income Attributable to PayPal Per Share of Common Stock (dollars)
Basic						(f)	$	0.20
Diluted						(f)	$	0.20

Average Common Shares Outstanding
Basic						(f)		1,216
Diluted						(f)		1,229


	United States		Other Countries		Total
	(In millions)
Owned facilities		1.0		—		1.0
Leased facilities		0.9		1.2		2.1

Total facilities		1.9		1.2		3.1


	Year Ended December 31,									Percent Increase/(Decrease)
	2014			2013			2012			2014			2013
	(In millions, except percentages)
Net Revenues	$	8,025		$	6,727		$	5,662			19	%		19	%
Operating Expenses		6,757			5,636			4,782			20	%		18	%

Operating Income		1,268			1,091			880			16	%		24	%
Income Tax Expense		842			129			113			553	%		14	%
Effective Income Tax Rate		67	%		12	%		13	%			**			**
Net Income	$	419		$	955		$	778			(56	)%		23	%


	Three Months Ended March 31,						Percent Increase/ (Decrease)
	2015			2014			Percent Increase/ (Decrease)
	(In millions, except percentages)
Non-GAAP operating income	$	473		$	412			15	%
Non-GAAP operating margin		22	%		22	%		*	*
Non-GAAP net income	$	360		$	337			7	%


	Year Ended December 31,						Percent Increase/ (Decrease)
	2014		2013		2012		2014			2013
	*(In millions, except percentages)*
Transaction revenues	$	7,107	$	5,992	$	5,028		19	%		19	%
Other value added services		918		735		634		25	%		16	%

Net revenues	$	8,025	$	6,727	$	5,662		19	%		19	%


	December 31,
	2014			2013
Percentage of Loans Receivable with FICO scores > 680		54	%		55	%
Percentage of Loans Receivable with FICO scores < 599		9	%		9	%

Percent of Loans Receivable current		90	%		90	%
Percent of Loans Receivable > 90 days outstanding		4	%		4	%


	Three Months Ended March 31,				Percent Increase/ (Decrease)
	2015		2014		Percent Increase/ (Decrease)
	*(In millions, except percentages)*
Transaction revenues	$	1,914	$	1,674		14	%
Other value added services		223	$	200		12	%

Net revenues	$	2,137	$	1,874		14	%


	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2015			2014
	(In millions)
GAAP operating income	$	322		$	318
Stock-based compensation expense and related employer payroll taxes		82			73
Amortization of acquired intangible assets		16			21
Separation		5			—
Restructuring		48			—

Total non-GAAP operating income adjustments		151			94

Non-GAAP operating income	$	473		$	412

Non-GAAP operating margin		22	%		22	%


	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2015			2014
	(In millions)
GAAP income before income taxes	$	321		$	312
GAAP provision for income taxes		66			694

GAAP net income		255			(382	)
Non-GAAP adjustments to net income:
Non-GAAP operating income adjustments (see table above)		151			94
Amortization of intangibles of investments		—			2
Other certain significant gains, losses, or charges		—			650
Tax effect of non-GAAP adjustments		(46	)		(27	)

Non-GAAP net income	$	360		$	337

GAAP effective tax rate		21	%		222	%
Tax effect of non-GAAP adjustments to net income		3	%		(205	)%

Non-GAAP effective tax rate		24	%		17	%


	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2015			2014
	(In millions)
Net cash provided by operating activities	$	544		$	425
Less: Purchases of property and equipment		(194	)		(100	)

Free cash flow	$	350		$	325


Payments Due During the Year Ending December 31,	Purchase Obligations		Operating Leases		Total
	(In millions)
2015	$	144	$	33	$	177
2016		42		31		73
2017		1		28		29
2018		—		26		26
2019		—		17		17
Thereafter		—		24		24

	$	187	$	159	$	346


Name	Age	Position
Daniel H. Schulman	57	President and Chief Executive Officer
Jonathan Auerbach	52	Senior Vice President, Chief Strategy and Growth Officer
Tomer Barel	42	Senior Vice President, Chief Risk Officer
James J. Barrese	47	Chief Technology Officer and Senior Vice President, Payment Services
Patrick L. A. Dupuis	52	Senior Vice President, Interim Chief Financial Officer
Hill Ferguson	43	Senior Vice President, Consumer
Gary Marino	58	Senior Vice President, Global Credit and the Americas
Louise Pentland	43	Senior Vice President, General Counsel
William J. Ready	35	Senior Vice President, Merchant and Next Generation Commerce


Role	2015 Annual Retainer
Lead Independent Director	$	25,000
Committee Chairs
Audit	$	20,000
Compensation	$	15,000
Corporate Governance & Nominating	$	15,000
Committee Members
Audit	$	18,000
Compensation	$	12,000
Corporate Governance & Nominating	$	10,000


Total Direct Compensation Opportunity		Rationale
Equity Awards		• Aligned executive incentives with the long-term interests of eBay’s stockholders

• Performance Based Restricted Stock Units (PBRSUs) (1)		• Positioned award guidelines at target level with the median of the market levels paid to eBay’s peer group executives

• Time-based Restricted Stock Units (RSUs) (2)		• Recognized individual eBay executives’ recent performance and potential future contributions

• Stock options (3)		• Retained executives for the long term • Provided a total compensation opportunity with payouts varying based on eBay’s operating and stock price performance

Annual Cash Incentive Awards		• Aligned executive compensation with eBay’s annual performance • Enabled eBay to attract, retain, and reward talented individuals who contributed to the company’s success • Motivated eBay executives to enhance the value of the company

Base Salary		• Rewarded individuals’ current contributions to eBay • Reflected the scope of their roles and responsibilities • Compensated for expected day-to-day performance


	Minimum			Target			Maximum
FX-neutral revenue		25	%		50	%		100	%
Non-GAAP operating margin dollars		25	%		50	%		100	%


Performance Measures (1)		Rationale
Primary eBay financial performance measure
Non-GAAP net income (2), subject to a Minimum FX-neutral revenue threshold (3)		The eBay Compensation Committee believed non-GAAP net income was the key measure of short- and intermediate-term results for eBay given that it could be directly affected by the decisions of eBay’s management and provided the most widely followed measure of financial performance. The eBay Compensation Committee also believed that this primary non-GAAP net income measure should be subject to a minimum revenue threshold and should result in no cash incentive being paid when future income would be negatively impacted by insufficient revenue growth.

Individual measure
Individual performance		The eBay Compensation Committee believed that a portion of the compensation payable under this plan should be differentiated based on individual performance for which a review was conducted at the end of the year.


NAME	Target Annual Equity Award		Target Percentage of Annual Salary for Annual Cash Incentive Award			Base Salary
Patrick L. A. Dupuis	$	1.0 million		60	%	$	525,000
James J. Barrese	$	1.7 million		60	%	$	550,000
Hill Ferguson	$	1.7 million		60	%	$	465,000


Award Type		Treatment
Target PBRSU Awards		Each eBay target PBRSU award with a fiscal year 2014-2015 performance period or a fiscal year 2015-2016 performance period held by a PayPal employee (including awards granted for accounting purposes) will be converted into a PayPal target PBRSU award. The target number of PayPal shares subject to the PayPal award will be adjusted in order to preserve the aggregate intrinsic value of the original eBay target PBRSU award, as measured immediately before and immediately after the distribution date, subject to rounding.

RSUs		Each unvested award of eBay RSUs held by a PayPal employee will be converted into a PayPal RSU award that will continue to vest over the same period as the unvested award of eBay RSUs to which such award corresponds. The number of shares of PayPal common stock subject to the award will be adjusted in order to preserve the aggregate intrinsic value of the original eBay RSU award, as measured immediately before and immediately after the distribution date, subject to rounding.

Stock Options		Each outstanding eBay stock option (whether vested or unvested) held by a PayPal employee and each outstanding eBay stock option (which is vested and exercisable) held by a former PayPal employee will be converted into an option to purchase shares of PayPal common stock that will continue to vest over the same period as the unvested eBay stock option to which such PayPal option corresponds. The exercise price and number of shares subject to each such PayPal stock option will be adjusted in order to preserve the aggregate intrinsic value of the original eBay stock option, as measured immediately before and immediately after the distribution date, subject to rounding.


Name	Annual Cash Incentive Target as Percentage of Base Salary		Payment as a Percentage of Target*		Size of annual cash incentive award for 2014
Daniel H. Schulman		175		94	$	335,959.58
Patrick L. A. Dupuis		60		105.8	$	330,513.59
William J. Ready**		66.67		110.5	$	222,610.59
James J. Barrese		60		94	$	302,499.14
Hill Ferguson		60		94	$	259,949.86


Name and Principal Position (a)	Year (b)		Salary ($)(c)		Bonus ($)(d)		Stock Awards ($)(e)		Option Awards ($)(f)		Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation ($)(g)		All Other Compensation ($)(h)		Total ($)(i)
Daniel H. Schulman President and Chief Executive Officer (1)		2014		204,231		0		14,508,104		1,330,803		335,960		22,308,808		38,687,906
Patrick L. A. Dupuis Senior Vice President, Interim Chief Financial Officer		2014		520,904		50,000		2,777,670		138,930		330,514		11,208		3,829,226
William J. Ready Senior Vice President, Merchant and Next Generation Commerce		2014		302,308		0		30,840,980		0		222,611		13,036		31,378,935
James J. Barrese Chief Technology Officer and Senior Vice President, Payment Services		2014		536,346		0		6,301,753		236,170		302,499		13,081		7,389,849
Hill Ferguson Senior Vice President, Consumer		2014		460,904		0		6,301,753		236,170		259,950		11,168		7,269,945


					Estimated Future Payouts Under Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards						Estimated Future Payouts Under Equity Incentive Plan Awards						All Other Stock Awards: Number of Shares of Stock or Units (#)(j)		All Other Option Awards: Number of Securities Underlying Options (#)(k)		Exercise or Base Price of Option Awards ($/Sh)(l)		Grant Date Fair Value ($)(m)
Name (a)	Approval Date (b)		Grant Date (c)		Threshold ($)(d)		Target ($)(e)		Maximum ($)(f)		Threshold (#)(g)		Target (#)(h)		Maximum (#)(i)								Grant Date Fair Value ($)(m)
Daniel H. Schulman
Options		9/26/2014		10/15/2014		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		101,588		50.24		1,330,803
RSUs		9/26/2014		10/15/2014		—		—		—		—		—		—		84,657		—		—		4,253,168
RSUs		9/26/2014		10/15/2014		—		—		—		—		—		—		77,950		—		—		3,916,208
RSUs		9/26/2014		10/15/2014		—		—		—		—		—		—		76,594		—		—		3,848,083
eIP – company performance		N/A		N/A		134,026		268,053		536,106		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
eIP – individual performance		N/A		N/A		—		89,351		178,702		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
PBRSUs (2014-2015 performance period)		9/26/2014		10/15/2014		—		—		—		20,318		50,794		121,906		—		—		—		2,490,645

Patrick L. A. Dupuis
Options		1/29/2014		4/1/2014		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		10,314		56.04		138,930
RSUs		1/29/2014		4/1/2014		—		—		—		—		—		—		5,157		—		—		288,998
RSUs		8/7/2014		8/15/2014		—		—		—		—		—		—		37,514		—		—		1,974,737
eIP – company performance		N/A		N/A		117,203		234,407		468,814		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
eIP – individual performance		N/A		N/A		—		78,136		156,271		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
PBRSUs (2014-2015 performance period)		1/29/2014		4/1/2014		—		—		—		3,438		8,595		20,628		—		—		—		513,935

William J. Ready
RSUs		11/21/13		1/15/2014		—		—		—		—		—		—		472,756		—		—		25,429,545
RSUs		11/21/13		1/15/2014		—		—		—		—		—		—		100,603		—		—		5,411,435
eIP – company performance		N/A		N/A		75,581		151,162		302,323		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
eIP – individual performance		N/A		N/A		—		50,387		100,774		—		—		—		—		—		—		—

James J. Barrese
Options		1/29/2014		4/1/2014		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		17,533		56.04		236,170
RSUs		1/29/2014		4/1/2014		—		—		—		—		—		—		8,767		—		—		491,303
RSUs		8/7/2014		8/15/2014		—		—		—		—		—		—		93,784		—		—		4,936,790
eIP – company performance		N/A		N/A		120,678		241,356		482,711		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
eIP – individual performance		N/A		N/A		—		80,452		160,904		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
PBRSUs (2014-2015 performance period)		1/29/2014		4/1/2014		—		—		—		5,845		14,611		35,067		—		—		—		873,660

Hill Ferguson
Options		1/29/2014		4/1/2014		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		17,533		56.04		236,170
RSUs		1/29/2014		4/1/2014		—		—		—		—		—		—		8,767		—		—		491,303
RSUs		8/7/2014		8/15/2014		—		—		—		—		—		—		93,784		—		—		4,936,790
eIP – company performance		N/A		N/A		103,703		207,407		414,814		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
eIP – individual performance		N/A		N/A		—		69,136		138,271		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
PBRSUs (2014-2015 performance period)		1/29/2014		4/1/2014		—		—		—		5,845		14,611		35,067		—		—		—		873,660


	Option Awards													Stock Awards
Name	Number of Securities Underlying Unexer- cised Options (#) Exercisable		Number of Securities Underlying Unexer- cised Options (#) Unexer- cisable			Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Securities Underlying Unexer- cised Unearned Options (#)		Option Exercise Price ($)		Option Grant Date		Option Expiration Date		Number of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested (#)			Market Value Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested ($) (1)		Stock Grant Date		Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested (#)			Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Market or Payout Value of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested ($) (1)
Daniel H. Schulman		0		101,588	⁽⁴⁾		0		50.24		10/15/2014		10/15/2021
															84,657	⁽⁷⁾		4,750,951		10/15/2014
															76,594	⁽⁹⁾		4,298,455		10/15/2014
																						20,318	⁽⁸⁾		1,140,246
Patrick L. A. Dupuis		314		5,034	⁽³⁾		0		36.59		4/2/2012		4/2/2019
		4,251		5,951	⁽²⁾		0		55.71		4/1/2013		4/1/2020
		1,719		8,595	⁽²⁾		0		56.04		4/1/2014		4/1/2021
															3,774	⁽⁶⁾		211,797		4/2/2012
															31,500	⁽¹¹⁾		1,767,780		4/2/2012
															3,825	⁽⁵⁾		286,268		4/1/2013
															9,013	⁽¹⁶⁾		505,810		3/1/2014
															5,157	⁽⁵⁾		289,411		4/1/2014
															37,514	⁽¹⁴⁾		2,105,286		8/15/2014
															3,656	⁽¹⁷⁾		205,175		3/1/2014
																						3,438	⁽⁸⁾		192,941
William J. Ready															28,958	⁽¹²⁾		1,625,123		12/19/2013
															96,523	⁽¹²⁾		5,416,871		12/19/2013
															100,603	⁽¹³⁾		5,645,840		1/15/2014
															472,756	⁽¹³⁾		26,531,067		1/15/2014
James J. Barrese		1,896		1,138	⁽²⁾		0		32.29		3/1/2011		3/1/2018
		1,031		3,300	⁽³⁾		0		36.59		4/2/2012		4/2/2019
		3,542		4,960	⁽²⁾		0		55.71		4/1/2013		4/1/2020
		2,922		14,611	⁽²⁾		0		56.04		4/1/2014		4/1/2021
															2,275	⁽⁵⁾		127,673		3/1/2011
															5,000	⁽¹⁰⁾		280,600		3/1/2011
															6,600	⁽⁶⁾		370,392		4/2/2012
															21,750	⁽¹¹⁾		1,220,610		4/2/2012
															8,502	⁽⁵⁾		477,132		4/1/2013
															8,767	⁽⁵⁾		492,004		4/1/2014
															93,784	⁽¹⁴⁾		5,263,158		8/15/2014
																						5,845	⁽⁸⁾		328,021
Hill Ferguson		4,333		867	⁽¹⁵⁾		0		28.46		9/9/2011		9/9/2018
		3,133		1,567	⁽³⁾		0		36.12		4/13/2012		4/13/2019
		2,362		3,306	⁽²⁾		0		55.71		4/1/2013		4/1/2020
		2,922		14,611	⁽²⁾		0		56.04		4/1/2014		4/1/2021
															650	⁽⁷⁾		36,478		9/9/2011
															5,000	⁽¹⁰⁾		280,600		9/9/2011
															2,024	⁽⁶⁾		113,587		4/2/2012
															6,750	⁽¹¹⁾		378,810		4/2/2012
															1,074	⁽⁶⁾		60,273		4/13/2012
															21,044	⁽¹⁰⁾		1,180,989		9/14/2012
															5,667	⁽⁵⁾		318,032		4/1/2013
															3,542	⁽¹⁰⁾		198,777		4/1/2013
															8,767	⁽⁵⁾		492,004		4/1/2014
															93,784	⁽¹⁴⁾		5,263,158		8/15/2014
																						5,845	⁽⁸⁾		328,021


Name	Executive Contributions in Last FY ($)		Registrant’s Contributions in Last FY ($)		Aggregate Earnings in Last FY ($)(1)		Aggregate Withdrawals/ Distributions ($)		Aggregate Balance at Last FYE ($)
Daniel H. Schulman		—		—		—		—		—
Patrick L. A. Dupuis		—		—		—		—		—
William J. Ready		—		—		—		—		—
James J. Barrese (2)		280,252		—		13,852		—		391,952
Hill Ferguson		—		—		—		—		—


Name	Voluntary Termination ($)(a)		Termination for Cause ($)(b)		Involuntary Termination Other than for Cause ($)(c)		Change in Control ($)(d)		Death or Disability ($)(e)
Daniel H. Schulman		—		—		20,237,854		20,237,854		9,985,292
Patrick L. A. Dupuis		—		—		4,976,307		—		—
William J. Ready		—		—		7,041,994		—		—
James J. Barrese		—		—		—		—		—
Hill Ferguson		—		—		—		—		—


Award Type		Treatment

Stock Options		Each eBay stock option held by a PayPal employee and each vested and exercisable eBay stock option held by a former PayPal employee will be converted into an option to purchase shares of PayPal common stock. The exercise price and number of shares subject to each such PayPal stock option will be adjusted as described in the employee matters agreement in order to preserve the aggregate intrinsic value of the original eBay stock option, as measured immediately before and immediately after the distribution date, subject to rounding.

Restricted Stock Units		Each award of eBay restricted stock units held by a PayPal employee will be converted into a PayPal restricted stock unit award. The number of shares of PayPal common stock subject to the award will be adjusted as described in the employee matters agreement in order to preserve the aggregate intrinsic value of the original eBay restricted stock unit award, as measured immediately before and immediately after the distribution date, subject to rounding.

Restricted Stock Awards		Each award of eBay restricted stock held by a PayPal employee will be converted into a PayPal restricted stock award. The number of shares of PayPal common stock subject to the award will be adjusted as described in the employee matters agreement in order to preserve the aggregate intrinsic value of the original eBay restricted stock award, as measured immediately before and immediately after the distribution date, subject to rounding.

Target PBRSU Awards		Each eBay target performance-based restricted stock unit award with a fiscal year 2014-2015 performance period or a fiscal year 2015-2016 performance period held by a PayPal employee (including awards granted for accounting purposes) will be converted into a PayPal performance-based restricted stock unit award, with the performance criteria for the 2014-2015 award being adjusted so that performance will be based on aggregate eBay Inc. performance for 2014 and PayPal-specific performance for 2015. The target number of PayPal shares subject to the PayPal award will be adjusted as described in the employee matters agreement in order to preserve the aggregate intrinsic value of the original eBay target performance-based restricted stock unit share award, as measured immediately before and immediately after the distribution date, subject to rounding.


Name and Address of Beneficial Owner	Amount and Nature of Beneficial Ownership	Percent of Class
BlackRock, Inc. (1)	66,796,090	5.4%


Name of Beneficial Owner	Shares Beneficially Owned	Percent of Class
Daniel H. Schulman	19,275	*
Jonathan Christodoro⁽¹⁾	0	*
Scott D. Cook⁽²⁾	204,992	*
John J. Donahoe⁽³⁾	2,267,814	*
David W. Dorman⁽⁴⁾	900	*
Gail J. McGovern⁽⁵⁾	162	*
David M. Moffett⁽⁶⁾	6,858	*
Pierre M. Omidyar⁽⁷⁾	96,009,558	7.88%
Frank D. Yeary⁽⁸⁾	0	*
James J. Barrese⁽⁹⁾	10,892	*
Patrick L. A. Dupuis⁽¹⁰⁾	90,381	*
Hill Ferguson⁽¹¹⁾	18,060	*
William J. Ready	6,650	*

All directors and officers as a group (17 persons)	165,577,206	8.10%



	Page Number

*Combined Financial Statements:*

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm		F-2

Combined Balance Sheet		F-3

Combined Statement of Income		F-4

Combined Statement of Comprehensive Income		F-5

Combined Statement of Equity		F-6

Combined Statement of Cash Flows		F-7

Notes to Combined Financial Statements		F-8

*Condensed Combined Financial Statements:*

Condensed Combined Balance Sheet		F-41

Condensed Combined Statement of Income		F-42

Condensed Combined Statement of Comprehensive Income		F-43

Condensed Combined Statement of Cash Flows		F-44

Notes to Condensed Combined Financial Statements		F-45

*Financial Statement Schedule:*

Schedule II—Valuation and Qualifying Accounts		F-40


	December 31, 2014		December 31, 2013
	(In millions)
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	2,201	$	1,604
Short-term investments		29		321
Accounts receivable, net		65		52
Loans and interest receivable, net		3,586		2,789
Funds receivable and customer accounts		10,612		9,277
Notes and receivable from affiliates		694		310
Other current assets		378		267

Total current assets		17,565		14,620

Long-term investments		31		196
Property and equipment, net		922		858
Goodwill		3,189		3,187
Intangible assets, net		156		258
Other assets		54		41

Total assets	$	21,917	$	19,160

LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable	$	115	$	73
Funds payable and amounts due to customers		10,612		9,277
Notes and payable to affiliates		1,093		1,103
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities		1,434		771
Income taxes payable		29		37

Total current liabilities		13,283		11,261
Long-term liabilities		386		509

Total liabilities		13,669		11,770

Commitments and contingencies (Note 10)
Equity:
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)		110		(61	)
Net parent investment		8,138		7,451

Total equity		8,248		7,390

Total liabilities and equity	$	21,917	$	19,160


	Net Parent Investment		Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)			Total Equity
	(In millions)
Balances at December 31, 2011	$	5,181	$	64		$	5,245
Net income		778		—			778
Net transfers from parent		251		—			251
Foreign currency translation		—		6			6
Unrealized gains on investments, net		—		2			2
Unrealized (losses) on hedging activities, net		—		(104	)		(104	)
Tax benefit on unrealized gains (losses) on hedging activities, net		—		3			3

Balances at December 31, 2012	$	6,210	$	(29	)	$	6,181

Net income		955		—			955
Net transfers from parent		286		—			286
Foreign currency translation		—		11			11
Unrealized (losses) on hedging activities, net		—		(45	)		(45	)
Tax benefit on unrealized gains (losses) on hedging activities, net		—		2			2

Balances at December 31, 2013	$	7,451	$	(61	)	$	7,390

Net income		419		—			419
Net transfers from parent		268		—			268
Foreign currency translation		—		(42	)		(42	)
Unrealized gains on hedging activities, net		—		217			217
Tax expense on unrealized gains on hedging activities, net		—		(4	)		(4	)

Balances at December 31, 2014	$	8,138	$	110		$	8,248